The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.min.reg.07251983 �\� i,ti YF� � � �� . _ :,+�_ t� > .y ��.- f : ,�j.1c �P' tr* n�'�'�1�f 3 �.� � '��.;.,� ,� . � � liv r.7N � w�`;�hq k �� ,1 E�y�!��. � � ��tf}'. �.1. y ,� +` � L.� fi�9 �7ti..�� +i 1 .,;�, f � �,�iF r�� r�d 1 � f Y ; r�i) :1� .e"'�'t�` t y��t' '-. Y j 1 L� 6. �L�i��,y',,,��n,�t{�� a� i<��1�.�i*�n�r z's7�t�- d {n � .�;g��' �u ` ��'§ n� �' v-+� � ��... �` �:•b''��R��„t:�'i`�"'6��'di:�s..4::t�a' �:itlF��:.U`.'� i" �.w..... �::�J fr_-�.4..:.��."':rr�c �^, . D'+ � �p� (C� P� � � d � , ;j �.',,,., a� :;� Board of County Ca[missioners Agenda �'� July 25, 1983 '�+ : , i 9;00 A.M. E�aecutiv�e session-Jay Calvares ;: �` s � 9:45 Transit Authority Representative-Discussion ?- y •{ LfYYY U�+ � 1j' � {� s__ 10:00 Public Hearing-Ensign/MacMichael Veterinary Clinic- f�. Richard Grice,Planning �., 10:30 Public Works Building-Richard Grice �� - � 11:00 First Reading and set Public Aearing ' LUC-Am°nd: Satellite Di.shes-Colette Penney, Planning �' �i`� �,, 12 SeptemUer, 1983 @ 10:00 A.M. � �'` ADMINISTRATION k';� ��:!1 �'''� 11:30 ;;� Board of Equalization-Dorthy Mikkelsen, County Assessor = George H�mk-u� Appeal n` �� y� 11:45 Harry Kreidles APPea]- i . .�%� 12:00 Ltmch Break f A � 1:30 P.M. Public Comnent �o- �:.�: e 1:45 Resolutions and Contracts ' " �' �t ` Minutes '�""' North Star Graze Contract-Mark Fhller "" Staxwood Water District 1041 S�ecial Revenue-Richard Grice �'� Appmpriation Resolution-TOm Oken �� : 2:00 Public Hearing-{�7/J Rodeo Special Events Liquor License- �;;, Lu Hansen-I�puty Co�ty Clerk �, rs ,;- 2:05 � ��n,: tdodification of Premises-Lu Hansen x� ' �- 2:10 p��yc Hearing-Mountain Rescue Special Events Liquor �'.- License-Lu Hansen _ �y 4� 2:15 Hunter Creek Foreclosure: Housing Authority request for FUnds-Gail Scknaartz, Acting Housing Director 4:.• 2:3p Continuation of E�cecutive Session 3;30 JOTNT MEETING �f� Di.scussion with�Senator Tom Gla,s and Representative Scott McInnis Appointments to Transit Authority Board '; �nuggler I�rovements 's'i f. �i �\r•. t ; ., � ,��;=,Y; � - � ,� ` 't' ' ��`� 5f i � � r S 4�.✓ t .' s�f . '�� •+�f 4�k�a �y� sr�f � �a i� �� Y '''��kr� n i,�r A�.Lt 1�r�w u ,s y ��,�. �xr �a �.t+:tl�...:� t r 1 <'� 1 s �7 ��x � �7 �.�i�`.��.:'SL..`r3�'ilc�'��1 �� 4 •P��.t��fA�.N�'x' u r� .-�,�R��; b� t a J4 �.. t �. y v i Y„ r't ��} .�'"�r rt'�,'1 �xf!l�1b.rS...�_..r_k. �4A`�xvr�[.�wo.tlyii+++iii{#�i�d�+e.^-x.5w'.. 1J:�v..�J. Y�..-� �� k�W:- r_.'.� F:'•. `: 4 ''� C';: � �;z. �.::: .„:F,�� - _.. ��t7' � , i� J - .{�j i�% � �. �y��_ `, ' P �I�^. r� '�: ��; ��: PITKTN COUNTY �,. BOARD OF CC�IISSIIXt�RS a�� {� ry :v �.N:`.;. . ;��' ix' >"-`�` REGCiLAR MEETING 25 JOLY, 1983 '; a�.. 1��.�� .: PF�SEIVT: GEOIS;E MADSEN, 4liCP7AS BLAKE. MIC[IAEL KINSLEY, R(�ERT W CHILD, HELEN FQANDERUD i''` 1�.iY ---------- �� ' Y•:,;; Public The Board convened a public hearing to consider the Ensign/MacMichael Veterinary ' Hearing: e_': Ensign Clinic, a special review application. Planner Richard Grice submitted to the record F' M; MacP7ichael �. Clinic the co�lete application, the Planning Office rtemo of 25 July, 1983, and the Land li-,': G:' Use Code as amended to date. The applicant has requested approval to convert an ;� �;x- existing single f�nily residence, situated on approximately three (3) acres of land .M,K y��?+ on the north side of Highway 82 between Watson Divide Road and the Woody Creek turnoff, `�i into a vetesinary clinic. Virtually all of the usable property lies within the two S� �� himdred (200) foot Highway 82 setback, and the exi.sting residence encroaches on the �f one hundred (100) foot setback slightly. The applicant has proposed to utilize the �I:°:.....�I. �� #„� residential structure as a small animal clinic, an existing garage as a dog boarding �, f .i �<>} kennel, and an existi.ng 6arn for horse surgery. No new buildings or expansions have �.', � , :. been pmposed. ::�, ��." Referral comnents were generally supportive; the County Engi.nePS was satisfied with the road i�acts/transportation analysis provided by the applicant, and the Department of Envixnrniental Health has made various recarmendations with respect to water/sewer , • services. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the application at their rern�7ar �eting i on 21 June, and recomrended approval subject to six (6) conditions of record. The Co[[mission considered the cli.nic use to be caipatible with the puLposes of the subject zone district, and did not consider the impacts of the proposed c«�mercial , , i '"- Crnmissio�er's Meeting 25 July, 1983 - 1 �� ij' ' � � ;� ' ..IiYP� �7 � ! Z ; L� ��' '� �� ¢ ... S�L,y�.� �y v {R � ✓f .� �� .�<,�� -YV � �1.�.. i �� x � 5. � .;S S 7(ta��4 ��,. ��F�,� s ��xSl< � xi..:�t •r,� :�.,Ae.P t� �:y: �,�t ��w' ., ��7� e s 5 � '�r�� .. i�Y�A'eE �jr � :-. r"�. ._, 'jr 7A k Y ti 3 Q a J Y '� . a`.�• ��•�`}a+i {f �.: r }� r '�'q� >.�.� ?�:._. ...._'_.,..�+,��. -'"("t'�1,L..�..�a....��_f� s'.?_�._��.._.r?.-...s.. ____ i5...�kA..;� ,?-...'1a�:�1 :._.�1.� c i °,;a � �:,.� 1; M use to be significantly greater than the existing residential use. The C�mission '�-`:•� concurred that the proposal would benefit the canmmit and ,,,,_� y, granted the applicant jr'� an exe�rQtion from the Cam�ercial C3� as well an �loyee dwelling unit for • r�%,� t� EJ` . operation. v :°'=� Grice easplained that the Planning Office initially opposed the application due to �. �;� � its violation of the Highway 82 setback. The Office subsequently a�eed with the " �,�,. t'=' findings of the Planning and Zoning Conmission, and recam�ended approval subject to ir" '%-� the following six conditions: {n: s:ii•: - there shall be no expansion of the buildings on the property �+Z;,;• - the•parking area shall be screened and a11 eacisting vegetation preserved t%�` - the applicant shall maintain the isrigation of the meadow �#x.' - parking shall be prohibited on the paved apmn r�` - all applicable health standards must be met to the satisfaction of the Department <r;� of Envirorumntal Health `-;�. - the e�loyee unit shall cortg�ly with the e�loyee dwelling imit regulations ��: K��*�� noted that the applicant may rern,;Te a variance from the Board of U,,:i Adjustment to address the location of the zesidence within the setback, and expressed 'i��--�;� : some ooncern with future caimercial uses on the subject property, Grice explained that i,.;� a variance would not be necessary in this instance as the applicant has not proposed f;:{,}:� . �..::,• any oonstruction within the setback, arx3 as the residential unit already exists within , ,x�.: r1Fti' _ the setback. He also noted that any future cacm�xcial use on the subject property -- would rern,;re Board review and approval. �k4 a�.;:;;>� � >�;��t^:� Child c�ras supportive of the proposed clinic as there are no such facilities within r : � several miles of the area. He also felt that the c]inic use would result in a reduction .,yi�� "Yy� of traffic given its location. �"�r� � � ! Madsen then opened the heari.ng for public carrtent. Paul Ha�+i explained that he � . .; i.�._., �. � _� purchased nine (9) acres of land adjacent to the proposed clinic property to construct �' . ;. � a single farnily residence. When the clinic and Hamwi parcels were subdivided, both � ��,r;:� pzoperties were req�L*pd to share a �rrm�n access driveway onto Highway 82 and further, {�. "r;i�ri S� " r^' �.j a specific building envelope was identified on the Hanxvi parcel. This envelope i.s , � � �'� ^� situated approxunately thirty (30) feet from the e�cisting garage structure, which the � ri:;�1 ' f_._�"v-<`*;•, applicant has proposed to utilize as a dog kennel. Hanxvi was concerned with the noise �•ss, i�acts resulting fran the kennel use, particularly due to its proximity to his E�: buildi.ng envelope. The nature of the terrain on the Hamwi parcel is such that the �� '� buil.ding envelope can not be relocated te any great extent, and there was conce.,in �Y� ,,�, that the kennel use would adversely i�act such. ..t.;> fY.,; �:�;� Kinsley explained that the comron access requirement was a stipulation of the 9:.' "!:�.:� `'>,`a� subdivision, as an additional road cut onto the Highway was considered inappropriate. ...,�. ` �� He indicated that he would continue to support this requirement, although he was �=' willing to review an alternative building envelope location on the Hanwi parcel 4 ;�;; ¢�:� p• t'•'...;.� i 25 July, 1983 - 2 �... `�: '.;{:_, �! . ' .,. � YY,� l f � ��, � ��j r��y� '��,.�'t't Lr � r . 1 � t�� ti t!� y �u� � .Yf �y� 4 .�.� � .. � :, + �5� �r fs�.yy ratr `S r 4a � � 't' f�rh�,t , ��X �� F1T'YtiF3} r • .- ? �, .. �wb�.r��,y r.:i tis � �-�tf� s�' 3 J� -r.� ,:. �.:� a�' �-� ,,.�,kCt,�,e i�'r�r arC!::.u_�...,.....iJ}fenYne�y':rc n....,X_.�::£_._.�.a.:_.�''......,�. :.'l.�' ,.#)„ - ' ��.v w.;.. � :�'!iY!..�.�+:.. .k4�� .r��,r G a .&.:-+.�'. . i ."�-��.,.I ' . F,:: to prwide for greater di.stance from the cli.nic property. r,;': - Hamwi explained that there were various constraints on his property, including .`�±�'�I a river, a marshy area, the floodplain, and the setback requirements. The only portion ' ' #.. . ;`�'`"( of the parcel suitable for construction was situated adjacent to the clinic parcel. �,'�� .�;:i ��;_ Ham�vi agreed that the clinic would be of benefit to the cormiunity, although such was � ; `:Y �;�, . �?: not considered an appropriate use for a residential area. ��. '`y',' i;�� Lou Derniine, representing the applicant, explained that the kennel would be liunited ��..< ��' to no more than ten (10) or fifteen (15) dogs. The kennel facility was proposed for r.,,�- !=��• veterinazy purposes, although it was anticipated that such would be available for �_;<, �.::�- `�� boarding also. �':x� >`"< Gerry Gerbaz explained that he was rern,ired, upon the approval of the Double X `'�:7 . ��Y:.';i Quarter Circle Subdivision, to provide turn-out lanes on Highway 82. The clinic _ �� use was expected to similarly i�act the Highway although no such retn,irement has . :;i� �.�,i . � .. z:;:1 been noted. He also noted that the subject property was a deer/elk winter range. �:_:::•i ��:-{ Grice explained that the application was not referred to the Division of Wildlife i•�.:� i, �;;-F;- as the subject property has not been identified as critical winter range. i ,� {, Richard Stutsman, the owner of property directlyacross the Highway from the . ;� croncerned clinic parcel, was particularly�with the proposed dog kennel and its noise i�acts. Stutsman indicated that he would strongly oppose the kennel use unless the applicant "� would conmit to keeping all anittials inside at all tiunes. �r.: �%'` Derniine e�lained that the kennel would be entirely enclosed within the existing :'�:-' garage structure, and that no outdoor runs would be provided. He felt that noise ;a� � �acts could be mitigated with insulation, and he carmitted to utilizing reasonable i� �3, _ � _ sound mitigation techniques. He also noted, with respect to wildlife inQacts, that ;�'. the Krabloonik kennel has operated for the past several years without inpacting � a. � : �r area wildlife. � : k.:::. i,. �`_ Child suggested that tk� Board convene a public hearing after the first year of .d,;:' t�': ;�_,!; : �: operation specifically to address the dog kennel and its noise i�acts. It was also 4 � suggested that the Department of Envisonmental Health reco�mend an insulation standard ��`. �� for the kennel structure. Brooke Peterson, representing the applicant, noted that there are noise ordinances with respect to dogs, which ordinances are enforceable by Animal Control. Aspen Village resident Bob Cappell supported the application as it was felt that �� i such would benefit the comrn�nity. t Kay Sim�ns explained that the applicant would make every effort to mitigate the ii[Qacts of the c]inic. She supported the application as the cLinic was considered an asset to the c�artrnu�ity. }�' L`�i) �',',:i Crnmissioner's Meeting 25 Jul 19II3 - 3 ':. ,,r . . �,,:,� ,��, .- �,(� �s.. p � s`� �.� ) _ ,..� :1p�. - ''Ni"Ia4, �t T i5y,��3y, ��. f t . { ��` � i E } n4 -�-s.�ury J ��3��tt �j:.�1i,�.� � r. r\�. :�., s '�� f}a�itss�-�`�+i'i ��,£;.�tp� y.:.}�.x �. i��*�� , '..`t -.�',• � s',uc � /f r��Y�y-,• � ?, � ,:t�+�M�..� .�...1�.,.. ._._.�_.:e. ....,. <..._f.�c'�.,:..w:w�ir:�..»�n _,...,....._ .r..�_>.__. 1+ �:ta.K�.u.... --?Ei ...... .�. ., � 1 i�:: �i Harry Batim�an agreed that the clinic would be beneficial, and indicated that he �,; � ';`.:;;`� also supported the application. :k '''� Gerbaz explained that he would support the application pzwiding the noise i�acts • ti:�i'� . . i. �. i"��"�.�" � �, s:` were mitigated and that a turn-out lane was provided. r; : �' ;� ( �' Sam Stapleton considered the clinic to be a real benefit to the valley; the cLinic F sf`,+,�� would provide for a large-anima.l operating roan, a facility not otherwise available ! ` " ! �x� except in Carbondale or Gle.nwood Springs. 1r "� �`k;;t� Susan Shwnan supported the application as there was a genuine need for such a ��;,�� , facility in the area. �`'. . $;»�`�� Peterson then submitted to the record fifteen (15) letters in support of the 1�:�?� application. Peterson expressed some uncertainty with Gerbaz's concerns on wildlife ; .� as Gerbaz recently received approval for a sixteen (16) unit subdivision across the • �;xi> Highway. He explained that the applicant i.nvestigated providing foz an access from - �y� ;.,;.:; �,':. Woody Creek Road, although such was not found to be economically feasible; the - applicant would agree, howeves, to discuss the comron access driveway with adjacent . i...'�;;,, . ?; i property ownax Har+xvi in an att�t to resolve his concerns. Peterson explained that ��• �`='�` the c]inic proposal was an opportunity to preserve the appearance of an eacisting ^� ' r;..�- propezty; the subject property could be expanded should it re�nain a residential use, whereas no such e�ansion would be allowed with the pmposed camercial operation. � The veterinary clinic was felt to be a relatively low-use operation, such so that Erc�''-" .� 4-'�:: traffic i�acts would be negligible. ,��'�' Derniine explained that the applicant would insall a sign on the property, which ,�t� 4 ' f::� sign would comply with all applicable Sign Code regulations. � , 2'_��? Madsen asked for additional co�nts; there being none, the hearing was closed. � , '3.. , � Kinsley then [roved to table the application pending resolution of the following: ` ,- d ~ � i - a referral from the Division of Wildlife on the wildlife inpacts f ,��^'; - a referra]. from the County Engineer on the need for a turn-out lane 4f;;.,. . *:?'::- - a recom�ndation from the Department of Envirarental Heal.th on an insulation �r�';;• f standard Eor the dog kennel � ''- s�:::_� �,: ,`t;�? - �;^;� Child seconded, and requested that the Planni.ng Office solicit cam�ent from the � ,. Depart�rent of Highways on the need for turn-out lanes. �� `` Klanderud indicated that she would support a referral to the Division of Wildlife ; to address wildlife iitgacts. She was not as concerned with the noise i�acts, as such �a-�` ' �:s'! could be addressed by rern,iring that all dogs remain indoors and by establishing a �,-=�•,� a;Fy� specific insulation standard for the kennel facility. She was particularly concerned, a;�i �t;'�;� however, with the i�acts of the cJinic on the Highway; lxorse trai.lers, for instance, ,"- �j_1 =::-a turning onto/off oP the Higkraay oould inq�ede traffic, in which case a turn-out lane .;:i�::� ;rf,� may be an appropriate condition of approval. She did note that the Board has adopted .k:1 �L-�?``� ;;<Y,}� policies that encourage the preservation of agricultural uses, and it was felt that �;��:t,� �:�� t;�ar+,� � '-,� Ccamissioner's r'feeting 25 Jul.y, 1983 - 4 �..., � `, ',;:��, . , � - , _ ��s ; ci � > r ,� _),�2� M{;��}` !> ! t . t t I � 1 � k l. _7.� ri �. P!: .. ..�. i i� '�RY� k �y?+n� I 3/ �a �,,,{�(k �'� #}��fY i�� 1 �yrx.� i i�,�7�� . � r � -X t�n�1�td�2t`FT�-5;:S��r Cr' Y te�t3..H..��....� �k r`kl q;� a 5��, � �`.�i* ��'+� {'�- � .....Z+Y`�' .,..� .._..f�.:3...�_�d:.�.�..=.M.ti:r_..... ....r_.... ,.,_-.�,... 4+:e.,..l...._.._::1 � _ �. . �•�� `�`_�r.,f�..r_. _Ff "` ..:..�, ;. . I , � � � ; i � the proposed clinic cromplied with such. 7} The motion initiated by Kinsley passed unanimously. � 'i; � ---------- . ' ;-*;�. �l,iblic Richard Grice introduced the Public Works Buildin a .�, �' ��Works 9. special review application , � � : Building requesting a parking reduction and a Com�rcial (3�II� ex�tion. The application, � ,: r'�" �,, submitted by the County Engineer on behalf of the Co�ty, requests appraval for y �.t;,-;(; �,c� an eighteen thousand (IB,aoo) square foot facility to house both the State Highway � t� .� Department and the Coimty's Road and Bridge Departm�nt. The subject property wnsists t : �"'=�' of approximately si�c (6) acres situated adjacent to the Bus Maintenance Facility i,r��- i`;�;�' pmperty on Highway 82. Referral co�mients were generally supportive; water services �,�.,• �'�:;:r� �`+�=' would be mvided b the Cit of As en, the Federal Aviation Ac�n.ini.stration and the '�:N:i:,,, P Y Y P ,f;:;.-� �';�„_� Colorado Geologic Suzvey both recom�nded approval, the State Highway Depazt�aent � t� s�ported the application, and the Housing Office indicated that the project would - ��;; t_'�1_' not generate the need for e[�loyee housi.ng. The Aspen Metro Sanitation District _-,�� r�::�;'' has not yet a�eed to the use of on-site disposal systems, an option available to J�,,.::�:.. t..y, ` the applicant as the subject property is not situated within four hundred (400) ' n �5� � feet of a District tnmkline; in the interest of gwexnmental and District relations, 4 , t'�-..� hawever, the County Engineer conti.nues to seek District approvai for the on-site u. .� ` systertu. �"' =.;�:y Grice explained that the subject property was created specifically for the public __...� �`�''"'' works facilities durin the review of the Bus Maintenance Facilit at which time a �ic„-�: 9 Y, S � � } subdivision ex�ption was granted. The application was submitted for Board review t s4i� ��:� toda to rovide for a Camprcial Q� ex : :,f y p �tipn; although a reduction in the parking j �f; �'��j�;j rec��irements has also been requested, from forty-five (45j to twenty-two (22j spaces, '�? t �'7 � k�.� . .,' the public notice rerntirements for such have not yet been acca�lished, such so that `,� , the review of thi.s aspect of the application must be deferred. F �, s ti � ` 7Y�e Planning and Zoning Cami.ission reviewed the application at their regular meeting � Y on 5 July, and recom�nded approval subject to eleven (11) conditions of record. '�,., � 't`4;�i �'��. �s The Planning Office recomnended approval subject to the following ten (10) � �.:�. conditions: - the Water Quality Control Division shall approve the industrial on-site wastewater '� � di.sposaJ. engineering design prior to the issuance of building peimits �"t ,'�� - all paved area and roof drainage shall be contained on-site through the use of "�,r': either drywells or non-discharging holding ponds - the sewage disposal system for both domestic and industrial sewage shall be '� engineered and approved by the Environmental Health Office and the Colorado '`� Department of Health prior to the issuance of building pernuts �;�- - the vehicle storage and maintenance area shall be heated, diesel vehicles shall �^� be stored inside at night, and the diesel vehicles shall be started and idlzd �s';� inside as much as possible - an exhaust air filtration system similar in effectiveness to the one to be used � � in the County Bus Maintenance Facility shall be approved by the Envimnmental -;' Health Department prior to the issuance of building permi.ts � 9}4�„ G. �'i�1 �r �;-,-y``3,','`�i Comnissioner's 1N�ti.ng ZS �Lt1Y, 1.983 - 5 j:: ,.::, .__ �____ - �� m _ , ___._.__ ';fi;: �l! . � ..�' � � {Mz�r� � �1 l� -! ij �5 ',pV��. �1�,.`� � yik".� X� i� . . �} .��r � h:'4'•4r�A s`ti- i,f"� }..` wl��'�i.1��J .. � � � LS��„��+,'r}.yf� t t�k,t'Gt ai� � '��.� k V [ �F .s! �14�� ..i � ��:» � 4�' �� " a,b!''`r�5r�`S7r f �,Y��,•�sy`i Ci �1 �i' �c,��fi'y k Ys t� ,��{... .. . . S' `' � �'� �"n . � '� �.y�-� 1.' .ev4'�y!�f!bNV.Kt...�l� E..ac.u.�fa=:YS._..rr.r:....-�..�.,�i�iL�i�.-....-.._..+I�.SkJ+`l. ..1, . .. .. . . .. . . . � ,'� ! �'� � - the County Engineer shall continue to work with the Aspen Metro Sanitation District `'-'` i in an effort to obtain a mutually satisfactoxy agreement with respect to on-site �'- � waste disposal . � - the applicant shall agree to City Water Department rern,iretrents for provi.sions o£ water service prior to the issuance of building peimits _ u�`'- .� - the applicant will be rec�•ired to construct a bike gath connecting this property :3 F� ,'�� to the bike path serving the Airport Business Center � ��. i�� - the applicant will consider providing a caretaker unit on the subject property � ; ��;".<,:� - the Co�ty shall purchase 4.09 additional'acres to be added to the Public Works "` ;y=•`-,:> � parcel prior to the issuance of a building pezmit for the County portion of the ;"� ,� of this facility. Construction may begin on the State Higka,ray Degartment's portion ��+"` prior to the purchase of the additional acreage i,�', "":�-" County Engineer Pat Dobie explained that the Code requires one (1) parking space g '� S i S; per four hundred (400) sguare feet of non-residentail space, or forty-five (45) �.� `�''"� s aces for the �.Y: P proposed facility. A parking reduction may not be necessary, however; 1 � twenty-five (25) parking spaces have been provided for outside the structure, and tn _ r another twenty-two (22) spaces would be included within the facility. The Code would ' ' be satisfied if the inside parking spaces were included, in which case a reduction . ��+�[ r; ;� would not be needed. The Board generally agreed that it would not be appropriate to f:;. : include tl�se spaces within the structure, in which case a parking reduction by x��:{';.. � special review would be necessary: i_;:::;"'�? .. ,��;-.��, County Manager Curt Stewart suggested that approval be conditioned to a trail t,.,.,.i; . . •, ;�",i:; easement on the subject property in lieu of constxUCting a bike path. He also noted ' F;;�;.� :� ,. _ that, statutorily, the County is precluded from utilizing its fimds to house its �loyees, i.n which case it was not considered appropriate to include a caretaker � '` unit as such could not be utilized by a Cotmty elrgloyee, Klanderud noted that the �:'' � 'z:::..��` :�:�:= Colorado Department of Highways may desire a caretaker unit on the property, and she ;��5� ;s" . ��'" requested that the Planning Of£ice investigate this. Grice a�eed to do so. %r: �;�.y p3 . Kinsley then rroved to grant an exet�tion fran the Coimiercial Q� subject to the � ' �. ten (10) conditions of the Planning Office as amended below: � 3�'�' - an effective exhaust air filtration systgn shall be installed �• -, , * , r � � - the applicant shall set aside land for the construction of a bike path wnnectinq � �_� this propexty to the bike path sexving the Airport Busi.ness Center r :- ' :== ;�>,:::. . ' .R� - the State Highway Department may install a caretaker w�it if pe=mitted to do so ,r:•=_-, . _ by state law ,:.;�. i'=i � Slake seconded and the motion passed unanirmusly. �� 15T Planner Colette Penne introduced on first reading a proposed �nendment to the Read: :': LUC Land Use Code regulating satel.lite dishes. The proposed amendment, initiated by the Amend � Satellite Planning and Zoning Comnission, would provide a definition for such dishes, identify ts Dish such as a special review use in all zone districts, establish specific review cxiteria, and finally rerniire a bui.lding pe.rmit for their installation. The Building Department, in its referral, has identified substantial life, health and safety concerns associated with this equipement. The pmcedure would require � that an applicant address and mitigate fire ingress/egress, the blockage of motorists' �;� �;Crnmissioner's Mee ' , . .`.C`, V�;�t;�:i � — � ��j o r '+ .`� � , :, ��: �: I1 i Y '`,,1"_�� f � ! t f �� s ,:. -�!S! � . yy� �S �. �7�� ,�M�F �. - y �, �y� � �� 1.,..t� 7y.- :� r,�,,'�.-L, t�i ' 1l, 4cfx�, i�� j�j'�,p�`.. rF '> ',„y 4'. '' k i,'�;}'7'.eF��f�Kl �t ��.rh4 �f�r 't�q� � 6 F hT 2i�'�S 4 l �( 1 T7�':�J y- � �: *`` ...,.. ti.r'i��'� .�i-�1 r� � �� w .� _...... � �� tk ,t�i��3'_'� :5�._ry. '�`"k�'"„s.fn^...f.:�c.� is��.+.. .:e �z._�1.u.l.....�'w.,�e!•.-�r:r+- ..�t..? .. �'aL:,. ..H....�.. •.k:..._._ � *f., i .,.:{ r:�''� site distances, setback and right-of-way rec��;rements, sufficient wiring and ,;,;'.:iq � `i foundation, and others. The amen�nt was reviewed by the County Attarney subsequent "''_� ur,;.- to adoption by the Planning and Zonin g Cortmission; the Attorney somewhat revised the ir>:'.� >;,.'- �, amendment to better define such equi�nent and to establish m�re specific review `,.�. � :' 4 �yr:. criteria. Finally, the Planning Office has suggested a billing system based on the = `�- t' � �; hourly additional billing rate establi.shed for the Office each year; this system was � . • s" t::`: t'„TM?�: proposed so as not to preclude an application, as the special review fee has been m.-:, �"��`-�: �y;;: set at six hundred and sixty dollars ($660). It was anticipated that tY� Planning ;�i-`�. ?'`:`� Office could review such an application an one (1) or one and one half (1'�) hours, ;��r'� xI2:•�^i ��.__t�-. and the proposed billing system would reduce the fee to between one hundred and ��?x '��-�� three hundred doll.ars ($100 - $300). �:-, J�� i':-;>.;�i u:.:;:; Klanderud suggested that the regulation provide for review by the Bailding � cµ,:: - x�"�, Depart�nt alone; if specific review criteria were established to address life .,.� health and safety concerns, as well as visual irtq�acts, a one-step process oould be �`_',�^,�; ;i?�-�:='': established by delegating final authority to the Building Depart�ent, in which case i,� - �:;:°":`_` Planning and Zoning Comnission and Board review would not be necessary. 4'r.s;�;;; B1ake indicated that he wenxl.d support a one-step pracess with the Planning and r'�-�: Zoning CoRmission. He al.so noted that it may be appropriate to pmvide, within the :•�' review procedure, an opportLmity for adjacent property owners to conment on such �'� !`� facilities. k f�. „_ Klanderud requested that the Planning Office investigate a procedure delegating ,,4�� the review of sate2lite dishes to the Building Department, and that the Office �r;".fi.:7 F:`�'+''`J determine the cost of the building peLmit fee for such equipment. Penne agreed to - i 8' �-� -� do so prior to the public hearing. i; ;-r--.�_,_., :#`.�. `� r : � ;'� Slake then moved first reading approval of the amendment as submitted, and to set �dY='>:;? 'y � - � E ` a public hearing for 12 Septelnber, 1983 at 10:00 a.m. Madsen seconded and the motion ; i 7�Z_;+,;.:!' �. �� ; passed with opposition from Child and Kinsley. (Blake leaves) ' � '� � S-.. �,-; ---------- � �''v�_. "". � �� Board The Board convened as the Board of Equalization to consider an appeal, submitted ization by George and Barbara Hyman, on the assessed valuation of the Hyman praperty located ;� to the west of Pitkin Green. Hymaz� disputed the assessed valuation of eighteen :��,�? �• �y -4:�; thousand, eight hundred and fifty dollars ($18,850) as establi.shed by the Assessor, ,,+.,; _ as the property was representative of undeveloped ranchland lacking both water and '..�� utility sexvices. County Assessor porothy Mihkelsen introduced the appeal, noting ��= that Hyman had indicated that he would not be able to attend today's meeting @ue to :.,,�:<'e+; � .._�;;`:: � - previous camutments. ;i. � �� Deputy County Assessor Warren Connor displayed a map of the subject area indicating :?'i�` � �� ,, ,�,�:. �,?`+*;•�.,;. "`'�'��1 Catmissioner's Meeting 25 July� I983 - 7 t--c;r •.. ,r��w � . . � E 2 S }k �� ,� zti� ..�, i . 14.' � °M�'l�„� E4� ��d, YM I 't :.- p5-��. Y t . � Y� :'n y�x a1 y T ,�4 F 11s^�� i,S Y'�y�y3�]4 :.1 r'c�' ;1 F S�� •T h`Ai'1� d �'�l'�r - �. 2'4�{ �1 r C' T7�'F`'di^.��}�F,r r � �� ''� .. , . �M� *�su 1'�'sfi �t � _✓.�..�.�. ��A�.qs*s,r��yrs^�:F „��h i,1�-,� �:�, ti�'4{VrL' ♦?J�4`"�'>��tS P . ..� i .,". .._: �._._,. ,.a1L ._....x.iu*..en�!aa:AY ,.-........_.�.v�.�..�a.__-.- t. _. ._-_.._. ... : _. __ _.. � � � � �� ,'� the location of the Hyman parcel, as well as several photographs of the subject ;!;;--'� property. The Assessor's Office analyzed various sales in the Red Mountain i.s�:�-,.� . � '� area for the years 1973 through 1976, and determined that the average sale • ;� a � =� per acre was approximately forty-five thousand dolJ.ars ($45,Q00). The actual � :Y,,�;�� valuation for the Hymazi parcel, which approximates four and one half (4'�) acres i �.i�. =f,,, . r,-�-.�:� in size, was established at sixty-five thousand dollars ($65,000), a value ;r�,-�c. Y;��;� which ttie Assessor felt to be rather conservative. The assessed valuation of •�:. !%-�;;�y ?•5'�": eighteen thousand, eight hundred and fifty dollars ($18,850) was based on the :��i ;�"=:>;r actual valuation for the property as determined by the Assessor. Connor explained that �;� s)�;�:. �:'�na �_,;,. Hyman appealed the Assessor's valuation as it was felt that the subject property '?�rz was ranchland; the property is zoned RS-20, however, can acc«mdate a water tap t'�=:" into the Pitkin Green water line, and can accamdate a sewer extension. - ,,; �� The Board generally agreed that the Hyman pzoperty assessment was appropriate , �.;- �_ given a conparative review of other land assessments, with similar sesvices, ��c--a1;� . ;� in the R�d Movntain area. Child then aoved to deny the Hyman appeal on this i,.;. .� �`.:;' , basis, and to instruct the Assessor to maintain the assessed valuation o£ eighteen :'_: �',�;': thousand, eight hundred and fifty dollars ($18,850). Klanderud seconded and the . ;:ti': ,F�,:. �;,=s;; motion passed unanimously. � ----- }; �`-��;�Kreidler Warren Connor then introduced an appeal from Harry Kreidler, the c5wner of �':.:� ''=„• Appeal Lots 7tao (2j and Five (5) of the Hidden Meadows Subdivision. Kreidler also fi:< � ;�� opposed the assessed valuation on the above lots; the Assessor established an � �� actual valuation ot fifty-three thousand, two hundred and fifty dollars ,��";,. s:i-� '�``: ($53,250), which provided an assessed valuation of fifteen thousand, four hundred ";� , � � i-"' "�':`' and forty dollars ($15,440). These valuations were considered inappropriate t� , 4 '. as the subject lots are uni�roved, and as previous increases were considered � �'`. f ''= excessive. Finally, the Kreidler's pay property taxes on a Snocarass Village f � '*- condominiisn unit where they zeside during the winter cmnths, and it was felt that F�i: �� ` these taxes should sanewhat offset the taxes on the uni.t�roved lots. �� Connor displayed a plat of the subject subdivision indicating the location of � Y, the above two (2) lots. He explained that the Assessor originally valued the lots at seventy-one thousand, five hundred dollars ($71,500), which provided an n..' assessed valuation of twenty thousand, seven hundred and forty dollars ($20,740). '�" This value was disputed bp the Kreidlers, and the Assessor's Review Camiittee �*= subsequently lowered the actual and assessed valuations as noted above. The - Review Carmittee lowezed the valuations on the erroneous assu�tion that the _,,�'• subject lots were contiguous; Lots Zt,ro (2) and Five (5) are not contiguous, Gi: 4��i j::a Cannissioner's ting 25 Jul 83 - 8 4. -�.if('�: ' .. ' .. :�.p±.Y1- �,� n '- �y� r. 5 � E y�-��"' � �', Y : , Y .. , �� ?� �t�,�'�t'r,�.��f�L�xz�af5y�{Y� 1 ,k .,�� t..� ��`;.�� T , �` K�' ��- � �� 1..., ,� )�t.• r' v �'}'�°'�7�c. Ya°` 1�9.ce �)��i�'�.��}� ti .�.`-" e* yt� ��t��`E��4 a t �i,��- �n^}, -��'�`�i��! S ,?; t'a`�: �{�� !�i ,-� '�'�°��a�r..c..+��c y •i'`ti �r4�`� � r� � k q"�'/��1�yi�F�r! ��.�'�c _.... . ,� :�r. =rh.y.!'a..ke.t:`.a..e..:t!..33� 3:_a..atr.s,ia.trSi:l�' ..t ,. .�,,x.£.Y,'u„ .i. .... _.. ._. ._ .. . .. ..r-� . ..__ : ... . ;!� i � r�1 S`�i +j� kwwever, in which case their valuations stwuld not have been lowered. :�� Connor discussed sales of other Zots within the subdivision, noting that - E):� F . �� one (1) such lot sold for one hundred and three thousand dollars ($103,000). �� The Kreidler valuations were estab]ished in conjunction with otl�r uni�rwed lots S� �'� with simi.lar sezvices in the subdivision � �� the subdivision have appealed these valuations, Finally, Connor noted that • ��.� �`' Kreidler was not present at today's meeting, and that he was rsot represented by �;5� , �� counsel. i.: i�i 6� Child felt that the adjusted valuation for the two (2) lots as detennined �b �•`<�� by the Assessor's Review Camiittee was low, and he requested that the Assessor �y; ;-;- review the possibility of restoring the original valuation of seventy-one thousand, five hundred dollars ($71,500), He then moved to continue the hearing until � '^; 'llzesday, 26 July, 1983, to provide for such review. Kinsley seoonded and the i��- motion passed unanimously. (Kinsley leaves) =�:;:� � �" ---------- F�:. ' " Public Environmental Coordinator Mark F1il_lez noted that the owners of the Cap J Ranch �''�' Con[tent . �}T' have agreed to donate twenty (20) acres of land to the U.S. Fbrest Service. The ' �•L:_ ' g.. ;'s _' subject land has been apprai.sed at twenty-four thousand dollars ($24,000). '�•: Jack Troyer of the U.S.F.S. would conduct a site inspection this Friday, and . � '�`I fo�mall acce t the donation at that time. (Slake retums) �.,.= Y P ,;`;' : .::.: ---------- . � ;�= ;�� - �'�� CDOH County Engineer Pat Dobie intzoduced a resolution appmving a contract between ��F . ti:<. . . . } `i Roaring the Colorado Department of Higknvays and the Board, for funding the replacement/ ;�' . 4` Fork � `: Bridge rehabilitation of the Roaring Fork Bridge at Old Snowrnass. Approval of the � fi � resolution would authorize execution of the contract, whereby the Highway c , . L,,. i:,',"-, :�,}; Department would agree to fund eighty percent (80�) of the cost of replacing �._. : f ' �; the bridge, or one hundred and twenty-five thousand, six hundred dol.lars ($125,600). 4 �. �'e:: � �:i.-:.�,�._..�, �} The County would be required to fund the re�nainder of the cost, or thirty-four - �� %� thovsand, tcao hundred and twenty-six dollars ($34,226). Construction has been scheduled for 1984. �" :' ' Klandenid moved approval of the resolution, Child seconded and the m4tion - `f passed tmanvrously. �' - � ---------- t`. � Minutes 4Tie �runutes of 13 and 14 June, 1983, and 11 July, 1983, were reviewed and � �� ,� « approved as submitted. ., �' . �: ---------- ' - ,,:.. ~'^P North Klanderud moved to authorize the Chai.iman to execute a contract for the �� Star �'� Graze , f .��._� . _ . . . �; :;�;'" • . i:�;''•::;, _ .� ; ,y��"�"�� ^ � � � ,.L�w'.�:9�.�c�.m.;,:a: . �.>f.1_ . _ _.� ..:.`,y"i.t..�t-;l J _-"��,_.7.�.,. _��:3.�y��!`..i�.. . -.5 �e k..;lt,� - .1::;Fev......i_.f. . �4:. ) :� i grazing of horses awned by Lou Wille on the North Star Preserve. Blake seconded � and the crotion passed unanimously. �;: ;;i 1�� I ---------- � � Starwood Klanderud moved approval of a resolution granting 1041 special review approval ' I Water ' ;'� District for the StaLwood Water District. Child seconded and the motion passed unanimously. � _ ; �';;' ''j ;� ;:.: ---------- k't:. `4.`.}.. . «.. :.' F'.:'�. � 1ST General Government Director John Eldert introduced on first reading a � �' ��N �..,.....;' Read: `�'�s�'�-��': Supp supplemental bud et a � g ppropriation resolution which included the following: ��.=�-:�;= APProP j'.�-"_`;;_'' unanticipated expenditures of thirty-three thousand, two hundred and one dollaxs 3��y;�-=� _ '� ($33,201) £or expanded bus transit service during the sis[[ner and fall cronths, ��y„^,,,�:�� . , S 6;� .� four thousand, five hundred dollars ($4,500) to purchase a mini-cortg�uter for the �`.� "�`^ rt, four thousand, five hundred and fort seven dollars )°;,m:.,;_; �P° y- ($4,547) to enhance �.= 'yr the data processing center, additional available revenues of one hundred and r�,=. � fourteen thousand, eight hundred and eighty-three dollars ($114,883) representing � ..�`•wq.,:, (�,r, . : _ additioanl investment incrnie, and others. :�;:`>- �„°-:-x� County Manager Curt Stewart noted that the new Aiuport Manager has instituted a:;.:.:�.. f':�;.5:_;,. . � .� various changes at the facility; the secretarial position has been changed to a full L ; '.,.� time sition, additional sim►�er staff has been retained to maintain the facility t......, po 4�� '+� � ��?':,� and the grounds, and the mini-co�uter was purchased to facilitate monitering s� ^� of revenue receivables and to administer multi-year capital and aperations plans. {� The various changes in the Ai,�,rt operations funds reflect the above. �`''"" Klanderud questioned an additional unanticipated expenditure of two thousand, G:;t:_:. two himdred and tturty-eight dollars ($2,238), representing an additional County ��- subsidy to the MAA. Eldert agreed to research such and report to the Soard � �, wu ' prior to second reading. f" � _-1::,, :�. �r..: ��-�`•>`: Blake then moved first reading approval of the resolution, Klanderud seconded `;�-"� �_r:i��;. . d�:;i'.:. �,.:.-;.' and the rtation passed unanimously. $ :� � ;. ' ---------- � f� ;� ' Public The Board conve� a pub].ic hearing to consider a special events li or � �:',, Hearyng e �', . �=-:c W/J license for the W/J Rodeo. Deputy County Clerk Lu Hansen introduced t2te ku,;. :45:�:.. ROCZPA . . -"'�' Li or a lication, submitted b the As rn,ac g .�..�_ qu Pp y pen Lions Club, re tin a 3.28 bees license 'r^3'.,;:: License �}�, ' for the W/J Rodeo on 6 and 7 August, 1983. Referral camients were generally 7f� �'-:i�.. �,�1 supportive, and Hansen reco[m�ended approval. �'x ^' Madsen then opened the hearing for public camient; there being none, the �";�; '`��^ hearing was closed. �Y'i �s{': Klanderud then moved to waive the formal hearing rern,ir�nts, Blake seconded Hn�F: . �^�M and the motion passed unanimously. � ,�: �; z:�; , �� Comnissioner's Meetiix3 25 Ju1y, 1983 - 10 4 aET� C,i..,�;. ;....a ��V ;..,:.a r:.;� __ .`, I17F'Gtl . i :� <� y �x. �.: �S .. � � ��,� ��)T? �A -�,*. i r a. �f..�. t'f ��,k��'rr ,�� t y� � �. .. }yi 1 r 4.1 f ` � i�.:f i�� ' � °S.'�t, f ` ��_ ja�+ y ,�i,�tij��ti c � . f T. .� � (�r � u` r' �ur-4y`�'�� '.�r ��•�•�"�hii:G�r?(_i-�.�S:.l,.,�L.n.�' ` '�;..��..e�l".�-�t'.''�.�C.+F....�'hfii��`..x.::�:wr`t.i n��.2. .�i;�. ..5�. .,�R::. �.,_ .. : � � :.''� '-�',� Blake moved to approve the special events liquor license for the days noted, �. 1?:`) Klanderud seoonded and the motion passed unanimously. �fr�',,'� ---------- . '7;;'r ';.-',>� The Lu Hansen introduced a request from The GroceLy, a food outlet located in the 'I� �.. � : �y�, �+� �'�� Liquor Aisport Business Center, to modify the presnises. The Grocery has been issued a • �< ��^ ,�,�_° License � ': 3.2g beer license and, pursuant to statute, any modification to a licensed � ',:�'Z t - i••,, I ��- premise must be reviewed and approved by the Board. In this instance, the 't:."; f;:�;. �•= applicant has requested approval to expand an existing storage area and relmdel �.,: ��: ''�"` a deli opexation. The majority of the expanded area would remain as storage. :�:p:� �.,;:;;: t.:,._, '•.!?��.• Hansen re�nded approval of the application subject to its review and approval "�:; ��';: ;�v by the Department of Environmental Health. �',��'�., �;;,,''^ Blake m�ved approval of the proposed modification subject to the approval of � � t2be Department of Environmental Health, Child seconded and the motion passed J _ �'� i,�.M� unanimously. ;c:; ------ � �"; Public The Board corrvened a public hearing to consider a special events liquor , R,., . Hearing: �-�r;,;; Mountain license application submitted by Mountain Rescue. Lu Hansen introduced the 4=5^;; Rescue �;�� application, a request for a i�falt, Vinous and Spirituous special events liquor k = - license, for the Bobby Riggs Pro/Am Classic to be held at the Aspen Racquet �. v. F ,`c•< Club on 26, 27 and 28 August, 1983. The Pro/Am Classic was initiated as a fund g�;:-�';° raising event for Mountain Rescue, and liquor was to be sold within a tent �='='_ �u-;;� set-up on one (1) of the tennis courts. The use of a tent would r��;re a � :'�� ;�r�: ; q'a�, te�orary use pexmit, to be issued by the Building Department subsequent to . F-": a . Aoard approval. Hansen recam�nded approval of both tk� special events liquor €'° _ � - � license and the teng�orary use permit subject to the approval of the Department ',e< a , � �a, of E[rvironmental Health. �i � � s 4 Madsen then apened the hearing for public catment; there being none, the 5g s ��._,_ hearing was closed. ��- � �r. Blake moved to waive the formal hearing requirelnents, Child seconded and the �_ .r.-,,.:.. ��` motion pased unanimously. ;�-. Blake then moved to appmve the special events liquor license for the days noted and to approve the te�orary use permit, subject to the appmval of the � - � Department of Environmental Health. Child seconded and the motion passed °� unanimously. �y ---------- �''� Hunter Acting Housing Director Gail ScYnvartz requested that the Board appropriate _�``, Creek Fbre- twelve thousand dollars ($12,000) to cure the default on a Hunter Creek � � Close ,:� .t'�� t�� nissioner's N�eting 25 July, 1983 - 11 df':ixj` I�^ �� y� �';1^'� - � _� �}, y se��` �. Y` �� + � ; �� .��ci.._�� cp xl!y,7 . f '_ 1� 1fik. f�i� .�r �' Y}�(�t Y.� -:._ y L, a'�+; ,�.(y . �;y '�� t�,�_S 3 j7 3 q�r ��1�� l�y"��{L�F��;!di!„t eV k 1{�� T-.i �45 .t � ro ��'� r t t�,7�jyFJf y r G ,a�" f 1 tiiY 3 1; ' # "tJ�}' � C P� ��.vn� .t r n.�� F 4 _.!Y��,y��Z�3 - {��} K j 4 '� .� � �"3C��0��(��J ) � �.1�..'9�.^SCUU,vw.. �.•�:�.�few��wu�s.+.i..��....v. ry ��w-nry � T �='41� q..; -'ry_., �..� tiT f� tA' e _ . . .�J1.'S'E.� �.�thhxiss..i;.yk.�_..S _..:..�:.i.:�.�21 .. ._ .:u�S'WJ�._a..:.s t�k > � :..L:. � � . � : f�.. ' ?:`'� Condomini�n unit. The holder of the second deed of tzvst has initiated foreclosure '`-'' proceeclings against the owners o£ unit 522, and there was sare concern that the ;yfiY:� �= �loyee housing deed restriction may be jeopardized in the event of foreclosure. i�.;:-� ; `. �`�:;:;� The Housing Authority has borrowed funds fran the County on previous occasions, ,�;"-" �, which funds were subsequently repaid with interest; a Park Ciscle unit, For exa�le, � �� - was purchased outright with County funds. This foreclosure was considered an { r,�:.-?� ��-. „�•,.:� isolated incident, and the appropriation of County funds was an interim step ��,, :�,.. ,x<r-; ��r.: pending the resale of the suUject unit. In the event County funds were not available, �- ;n.:v #:�"^_� the foreclosure could influence the price of the unit and could adversely impact �r.,r: Fr�.,. �,,.; the County's relationship with the bondholders. Sclvraartz felt there was a very high #=i:^; ;?.-r°: probability that the subject unit could be sold in the near future; there are three ,>�=,r d�:H ,,; (3) Hunter Creek units for sale at this time, and five (5) applications for each t•'�a� +: unit have been submitted. Finance Director Tom Oken e�lained that he l�ad discussed the request for funds r�- :k::i;:: ;?,^,=' with the Housing Authority; the Autkwrity was concerned that the unit would revert �s';," • �,:.:. � to the chmership of the bank, who would not meet the qualifications identified in .�.:.,,.. t-i;:.; ,.�;,. the e�loyee housing guidelines. The Authority requested the funds to avoid such. ``?N's Klanderud did not consider it appropriate for the Board to authorize an appropriation of £unds to redeem a bad loan. The secrond deed of tn�st was issued on �" :'�� fairly liberal tezms to a foxmer bank e�loyee, and it was not considered appropriate Gr; �,_:� ,�:.NY': for the Board to intervene in thi.s matter. The Board generally agreed to deny the ��^"' ��;- requested appropriation. �?.' - �;'I ;� -------- r < •# �,,.:.�i. l,.: �`F The joint City Council - Board of County Cannissioners meeting was convened. ' ?i: , Those present included Councilmenbers Bill Stirli.ng, Chic Collins, Charlotte Walls, '� "'., �. ;,� Dick Knecht and A1 Blomquist, and Board me.mbers Madsen, Blake, Kinsley, Child and �fi � Klanderud. � �:. ,.. � �, �"'i ; ---------- �r�•��'..� r�1;.,. t'�� : � S� ' �azggler Stirling i.ntroduced discussion on a resolution appmving a project agreement � ". i"��`�' I�rove w Agree between the City and the County for the Smuggler area inQrovements. Council has ' Y�`"P reviewed the various i�rovements proposed for the S�ggler area during the past six ��' 'c�` (6) weeks, and has expressed some concern with those associated with the Centennial ,?^='''r Phase IV project, Specifically, Council did not support thase i�rovements intended ;�;;:r: "�i"�� to accomodate the Phase IV ro ect as the ro ect itself was not consi.dered necess e,..,:" P 7 P 7 �'; ,.. ;��,� �':�::^ it was not felt that there was a need for another e�loyee housing project given .�,,, ;;�;; v y �;,�;: the soft rental market at thi.s tur�, as there was no shoi-tage of e�loyees, and .� �XF`, due to the txansitory natvre of the comnunity. Stirli.ng eacplai.ned that Council �� •� � �+;t,�-,^.. �s. ��;,y ��=�:: ;'.._�Conmissioner's 1�7eetl.ng 25 7ulv, 1983 - 12 __ � 'y, ;;;;':i+;=1 ,� � � r r y� sx �� .�r tr �� ri:-�� vt�� ,c�� . i �� - ��'� x t�tY�'��t'DP'`'� tid �tt�. .._,�. � .�. ., f ��I k� �� `� ��_<r� '4 ��,�� r Y }�� S� � yi.�. � �n P �.p i e '�}�� ' .;..:.t o.,I...._+ " n� ..3�..1....... . � ..__t��...:t'�sF.u°�r�..._�4 x ... H.tl,�JnrJ......�t�.;:LS.�.�.•. �d:-�4K: -.. . ... .. . . . . .,. . :._ : '�.. `. ' i `' I I �� further opposed the project due to its size and density, both of which were felt ;;.. � ,;..<; 1 to detract fran the quality of the canmmity, and as such was felt to be represent- F� '�� ative of an a�loyee housing ghetto. It was also noted that most City residents h .. {� opposed tt� project, and that the majority of the units would be constructed outside ( • �. ,`� k ��:�� of the C3�. Finally, Council was concerned that the project would severely i�act �;>.;::: �-� .1 G City services, including electric, sewer, water and police services, and adversely �..-.,�� +��'�'.'•':� it�act traffic conditions. Council opposed the Centennial development for these 1'e�r•,:i'.; ��'� reasons, and it was on this basis that the previous intergovernmental agre�nents ,�.c�;:_,_ �%r:�.. �='�ti were not approved. fn-;'�: t�4�"ti"--: The ro ects a �nent identified in the resolution was drafted b Council in -�,.:,r, P 7 9t'e Y �`�='`;�;�% �.:-.. n:� an effort to reach some agreement on those i�rovements needed in the subject area. '��'".-;;; 2==i;'� ''�'"'- cificall the Count would a ee to ac lish rovements in the following i:: � Y, Y 4r' �� P ,ri�.?'.?� areas: Mill Street, the Mill Street Bridge, West Gibson Avenue, Red Mountain Road, _.��,� t" :� Spruce Street, stoxm drainage for the trailer park, and the acquisition of right- �:`) �`, I of-way. The City would then agree to permit the County to acca�lish those i�rove- �;�=_ ;;�.":<,i �u,,;;,:� ments situated within the City, to draft an i�rovement and financing plan for the �=,:::� - _ City's contribution to the S�nuggler improvgnents in an amount not less than the final y;s';° �• ��r�: costs incurred by the County, and to submit such for voter approval by the end of �:;;_- s...�:;�:? - this year. ;"` 'I Klanderud eatplained that the Board has agreed to proceed with the phase one (1) �r',"'1 i[�rovements for the Smuggler area with the exception of the storm drainage project, k;-" ';:� i and requested that the City issue the necessary permits for such. These phase one �x� ��'-' (1) i�rovements have been estimated to cost approximately seven hundred and fifty ' 1=:'":r;! i.;:: . G= thousand dollars ($750,000). The phase two (2) improvements would provide interior �{ . � ± roads for the Centennial project, and have been estimated to cost approximately � , r ,f:� y three hundned thousand dollars ($300,000). These two (2) phases would be accot[g�lished � �� S ' and funded by the County, and vrould finalize those improve�nents planned by the � ' ,-�.,,'I � - - County in the subject area. The City could then plan for the remainder of the ;'r��,:,.' --. . � .- iicgrove�nents identified as necessary for the area, and arrange to fund and phase 4'�;;i `�.��=' those it�rovements at Council's discretion. Klanderud did note that the Centennial sa;r �J�'� '- project was the result of litigation. � Flti": =�;`'�" Blom;uist considered the stoim drainage irtQrovements in the trailer park to be ��'. ' particularly necessazy, and suggested that Council prioritize such. He asked if the �ia<; .t,�`� .�: trailer park residents were prepared to hook into the City's drainage system once :f�': ?�y an extension has been provided to the area. An unidentified trailer park resident ��.v: ?�:o explained that residents of the park were prepared to tap into the City's systgn ^r `,r: :x.' once the extension has been made. A��Li ��¢.3!V '�=�� Cam�issi�er's Meeting 25 July, 1983 - 13 �:,�s .. .._.__._—__. ......... .....� ._ ._ YM �_. . �____ ...'�;'�':��'� , i . '',�;,�r .� _ Z +� `�� t1 �k '�, �p� *�d�Z; �y;l�?'',y a �, � e . + tt �.`�y f ,�r(��{��:�� gr ..s,� � ��t '��'� . � 1 ..� 4k`,Tz��l�`��'Yl�$��F��f"�Sl 1 A�I��! ��..y �'3��,. i {>`k � �� '3'��fr� ��_l£�r�l i �;�� .:�� f} t::st � f�`� "y��}t r,�t �:. Z ..�s'�`y:�� 14.y7, M� Y k 4�:�`l"�„?�k '�'t t� �:.,fix �I . r ' ��c s �1:�r .� m.�,��i-�-._..5_. �,. .!F�_�_:. _._x,:�,r3��.: -• ....�:G�_,__.._...�.,�... .._ - ' .., : .,_ ,, ;, � i � •. � � �=`• � City Engineer Dan McArthur explained that the cost of a tap into the City's kt � µ. ,'y drainage system has not yet been determi.ned; although the project has been estiunated . 4 to cost fran between thirty-five thousand ($35,000) and forty thousand dollars ;'' j�;,...� ,� � � `�. ;�T�;S ($40,000), soil conditions, which detexmine the type of pipe necessary, wuld result : �`� in a higher mst. � ��.r'� Child noted that sane of the bids on the phase one (1) i�rovements were higher � ,�.R� ,�,� f�$ that anticipated, and indicated that the Board was not in a position to cortmit �-S*�� funds for the drainage i�rovements at this time. ;�`._ ;"�`c Stirling agreed that the storn drainage i�rove�nents were of significant concern, s::ss�:: �-ii: �fi.:_ and indicated that the City would commit to achieve those i�rovements this year. �c`�' �'. '`�+ Smuggler area resident Heather Caa�bell questioned the timing of the phase one (1) ;;.: ��;:. '-�5-' i�rovemAnts as the Centennial developer has not satisfied the twenty-two (22) - '� �': conditions of approval. Rlanderud explained that the conditions were inq�osed during ' - general submission review of the applicati.on. She explained that the Board has l_,=� = co�rtitted to the Phase IV project and that the deferral of the Smuggler i�rove�nents i, ;;�� would not preclude the project. The i�rove�nents included in phase one (1) were r � �.,� considered necessary regardless of the Centennial develoFxnent, and include the - i ""- follawing: utility li.ne conduits, the replacement of the Mill Street Bridge, the - _:,; 4 �! widening of a section o£ Mill Street, and others. Many of these i�rovements were '� ��'. scheduled within phase one (1) to address the future needs of the subject area and � , to el�minate the need to disturb the roads once again. ;;„., Smuggler area resident .Tohn Busch understood that the iirg�rovements to Gibson :j . y�� . e..;. t�r.:... � Avenue were scheduled at the expense of the bike trail and landscaping. Kinsley ex - �s.. explained that the bike trail to the commmity center was deleted fran the project c . � k . due to insufficient funds, although landscaping would still be accomplished. � � : I 4:::; �.. �.`� Madsen noted that there was equal developrtent potential in both the City and �y f ��' County portions of the S�rnaggler area, in which case it was considered prudent ,,:.,;,: , r� �� to provide for the utility conduits and some of the other improv�nents in conjunction ,� �� 5�;; phase one (1). He noted that the phase one (1) urQrovelnents would serve £uture - ;� develoy�nt within the City and not the Centennial project alone. Stirling explained that Council was prepared to drop its objections to the replacement oP the Mill Street Bridge, and to initiate a plan for future i�rovements --I p - to the S�nuggler area within the City's jurisdiction. This plan was predicated on the ` understanding that the City would not contribute to the replac�nent of the Mill t Street Bridge, nor to the Phase 2V project or any other improvements associated with this project. Council would request that the City Planning and Zoning � Camiission initiate review of future Smuggler i�rovements, including the phasing �"_+ � f�i'.-��.'] _� Camii.ssioner's � ting #'�'. ,�� . _._. _._�w �..._____ �, _ ,;;�;'�, . , :� •' .. , � � � �}� ✓�.l.i+ ` i` � �'�i° �'t � 7 ifi> th��c ��j�,� � Ya{� :1 � tN �. ` � �7 t.i� y�,�� jL i��h�� '�,�'F'rr �t7J > � S � �'.- p�":`�,'�4 r��".�� ti r`r;�tir�t�r t '� rt3�i iy7 i�ay�� -a �� r�f�.y�'� t e r r � l,, r � 'y � u ta H. �''� i 4-.;ff�"� '� pf'r vr�,��p .�+, �.' f 'i'St'r. �..�� ^r � k �YI>r�fi�j`�k '�i xd.. �ti . ; .,� �,.��..._.�:,...�� 4 -�dtf�a'4h�i.lsr:va�+k� .�Gi�.a .�ti_.z_< �� r rb�� f. :r �ia,_��:�r. ,�hs� , ;�,,.. I ��_.,J�.. ""'._...� -'_." . .. . , 'I �, �":l �'+�- � and funding of those irtg�rovements, at their regular meeting tomorrow. The City vrould � �+�:'�;":i also romait to the sto=m drainage iccpmvements for th� Smuggler area. Stirling again � , noted that public sentiment with respect to the Centennial project was generally ,� � � " negative. � �� .. ,'� L v-� �� Klanderud noted that the Centennial ro'ect has leted its � ,�, ; p � comp general submission � _ i� - a ' �?�j review, and that there would re an opportunity for public input at the detailed s . ��,�. �::� E�r;�.;_� submission stage. She considered it vexy unlikely that a proposal as good as �,'^=` 't"�' Centeru�ial would be made if the m'ect were deferred to future .�t;;;:: A J years. ��`'�t: F"=='� Stirling stated that Council has agreed not to pursue legal title to the Mill 5...�y�. ?.S-�:: E`.,^..:�. ��xt��•. Si'SEG't BT1CI ;�,ti.,:., ge, and not to ing�ede the building pezmits necessary for the phase one �.�,�:*:: q�-4';; �. . ?,-„_^ (1) lIfQTOVP1fIE[1tS. ,�r.r.�_ , �;>;:; No action was taken on the resolution. -. ` 4A` ��__�_�� -'T) � .,� Transit 5tirling introduced discussion on the Transit Authority and the crethod of `� Authority ��.: '� appointing its board. He noted that several applications have been submitted for �� the new boazd, ar�d suggested that the Board and Council jointly interview each 1,-c;-�.e - . u��?. ��'�� Z1C�311t. `I'tle BOdLC� 3[lCl COUf1C11 ;�::,: ePp generally agreed to schedule the interviews for . ;_�_..,- . c.,... M'";'�'. �lUTSC�d •._.,,, y, 28 July, at 12:30 p.m. • - cui - - Klanderud e�lai�ed that the new Authority wauld consist of five (5) m�r�bers; � -- � <:�.' �',s=� one (1) Soard memUer, one (1) CoLmciLresnber, and one (1) appointment each by the F i . � ' Board and Council. The fifth and final mend�er could either be appointed jointly ��: by the Boazd and Council or by the four (4) Transit Authority membezs themselves. � ;. ��= --°---- � ' ;";". San entative Scott Mc2nnis introduced discussion on the subs �� RePres equent legislative � '; > Glass ��,.; Rep session and those ite� tl�at local governments may desire to sponsor. `Phe sponsor- � � ' MCInnis � ��'; ship of bills by the individual legislators has now been limited to six (6) such � �c bills yearly, and McInnis suggested that both the Board and Co�cil address, within � �-!_;:• F`7i.-; the next six (6) to eight (8) weeks, those issues either entity[nsy desire to t-�",,. ` � sponsor in 1984. � Child noted that an issue of particular interest oonce,rned the subdivision ,t regulations, and specifically, legislation that would enable local gwernments to " regulate developirent on parcels of thirty-five (35) acres or greater. r Senator Tom Glass noted that he sponsored anti-trust legislation this past year 3 that would provide inmunity to local governrtients and m�icipalities. McInnis `��; co-sponsored identical legislation in the House and, although such was approved �� by the local govexru�nt caanittee and by the Senate, the bill failed in the House. ° McInnis explained that he would support the anti-tnLSt legislation again this '� � ��, . ��; CaR1R1.381.0I1P..r�S t].ri �,, ..,�>:., • . � 'L'�,�' ' yi� �� 7 , ' ,l}'K ,p� � S� �>"�°� tj�a .y� �. , 4 �� ,��; � i, �+, i��$�'�,t�Sr!�ya`<i.d.�1}�%r t��:: d r l� !j t �3 �+�AC��'�a!, {f� � i7•�r n . �' P �.n_�'ri.�'�T��Ij`,y"y' '.nlltfS aE"' h�,,,1 fer�t'f�� j' yy1.r"+ ..4J� �a`r �.,�ty.�r �i�w.� . �iy�, s1 • .� 4 ,S� P't ,� r'ti� � &. 1J f .s � d� ��rr �.m:.aic.fR9'4?:'orT1.S�l.��.��.�.�..�.�.._.��! ti_r.P::L�vi�rl.s.: .yy� �f �F,� , r i . .... K1Q�r �• �{��I -1t �..�._. . _.��__� _.�.��.__ _ _.. I :! � l �1 _ I year, and he suggested that both govenunents work towards its passage. The bill �t;��` � failed in the House due to the efforts of Representative Frank DeFillipo, and ::�; �� " it was suggested that, prior to introducing the biZl once again, DeFillipo be � %�=:<; : � contacted by all interested parties to discuss his ooncerns. City Manager Wayne E ' 8. � � Chapman noted that the Colorado Municigal League was interested in such legislation k '� �5=' ""`r�`" and it was antici gu passage. He � F�^;�: pated that the Lea e would become involved in its �'�t: t�.{;; suggested that, prior to introducing the legislation, DeFillipo comnit to allowing 1,�=': '�`�"'� the bill to be voted on in the House. Glass a ,��;,_ greed to sponsor the legislation in �;,4;� �.x:..:; 1-�,..;;;, the Senate, although it was felt that such should be introduced in the House given �4.. pr;."•';: . '""�` its failure there ].ast year. �ly.:�: t�.,=:+;, - 3`"Y"� Glass e lained that other issues that ma be r riate £or p �,.;•?�, XP Y aPP oP sponsorshi in the yr�':^-::i .::.;;� . �;:.': Senate in 1984 include the following: authorization for local goverrm�ents to enter :-?`.,•;: ° '�'�= into agreements with developers, a district for tourism development, water .��..`','.� 1'�' conservation, and radioactive waste disposal. With respect to water conservation, C.,">;;:� . `k'';'' it was noted that new developrnent in the Denver metro area was not required to l. :�:I ��':�� utilize water conservation devices, an action which encouraged greater transmountain �=t:i; t;+,:�;�/ diversion. Legislation could address this issue, as well as the safety and upgrading ��' � ' � �� of dams, another action which would conserve water particularly with respect to - the older structures. Legislation on radioactive waste was also considered critical ��. f as it was anticipated that such materiaY would be stored either in Utah or Nevada. r'::�;:;; �,�`��_''� There is no legislation at this time to address this issue, although users of the F->- ::;w.�; +sFm;;a storage facility would conduct as many as thirty (30) trips daily through Colorado 4w'�=" � 7 to reach the storage facilities. Glass considered it viportant for the leqislature , 1 � '. �",`F�� to asstmie a role in the transportation of hazardous wastes through the state. � �;.:,;� �" '; Finally, another issue of wncern involved transportation funds and particiil.arly � : ^ �� the use of matckung federal funds; such funds have been prioriti.zed for use on the � 1 ' f� � interstates, then for safety/capacity i�rw�nents, and finally for highway � ��-c.;;z� maintenance and repair. It was considered more appropriate to prioritize these funds "�.':,'' Cc��s`� i�..r= ��,� for repair and maintenance, with interstates being given the least priority, F-..t;�+i ,�`i County Manager Curt Stewart cam�ended both Glass and McInnis for their c�operation ,.f,� on the County's additional sales tax, initiated to fimd the bus system. . ^''+'z ---------- • '' 'Phere being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. �:, M: `!.: �. `p,c: �F M.�. �4 ��C'+. �.:';'�"- Crnmissioner's Meeting 25 Julv 198 - 16 . MLMU12l\NUUM 1983 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING EXHIBITS July 25 Ensign/MacMichael A Memorandum Dated July 25, 1983 from Richard Grice,Planner, Veterinary Clinic and Change to Board of County Commissioners in Use S ecial Review B Land Use A lication—Small Animal Clinic in existin house C Letter Dated June 15, 1983 from Robert Oden to Lou DeQuine D Letter Dated June 13, 1983 from Ford Schumann to Whom it Ma Concern E Letter Dated Jun 10, 1983 from Trudi Peet to Board of County Commissioners F Letter from Robert Capelle and Judith Holland to Whom it May Concem G Letter from J.Ann Davis to Whom it Ma Concern H Letter Dated June 15, 1983 from Wayne Va neur to Lou I Letter from Alan Storey to Board of County Commissioners J Letter Dated June 12, 1983 from Carol and Buzz Do kin to Lou K Letter Dated June 7, 1983 from Doug and Holly McLain to Whom it May Concern L Letter Dated June 8, 1983 from Jon Hollin er M Letter Dated June 11, 19$3 from Don Stapleton to Whom it May Concern N Letter Dated June 14, 1983 from Donald Ra burn O Letter from Martin Schlumber er P Letter Dated July 24, 1983 from Gracie Oliphant to Board of Coun Commissioners Q Letter dated June 12, 1983 from Mr.&Mrs.Robert Simons to Board of County Commissioners/Guidelines for Support Letter Drafted b Lou De uine �_<. ,.� � t� �. • htemo: Lnsign/MacMichael � _ l�age 7'�ro • • ' ' . July 25, 19f33 ' The vet and h.is as�istant's own commuter trips will be altered and result in a net reduction in total trips on Iiighway 82. • The app]i.�nt does not request special review approval for the instal�7a't��n of a "employce dwelling units" however, at one point in the :�mglication the a�plicant make reference to the fact that his a�xtant will be living at the clinic. In order for the assis��nt to live at the clinic, it was necessary £or the Planninq and Z•o,ning Commission'to first grant special review approval for . an em�aloyee dwelling unit at this location. The property is not eligible for two uses, a veterinary clinic and a dwelling unit, due to the fact that the property does not contain twice the minimum lot area in the zone district. In order to have two uses in•the AF-2 zone district, a property ownership mus.t consist of at least four acres. The employee dwelling unit regulation permits the installation of an emplcyee dwelling unit into an existing stru�ture provided the employee dwelling unit does not require , more than 500 square feet of that structure and the parcel must meet the minimum lot area in the zone district. So, this property meets the requirements for an employee dwelling unit. , Referral Agency Comments � According to Ron Thompson, Assistant County Engineer, the application provided adequate information on road impacts and transportation. Ron anticipates no problems. j According to Bob Nelson, Environmental Health O£ficer, the existing , � well and on-site wastewater disposal system violates the minimum 'separation distance of 100 feet from the house well, as required by both County and State regulations. With respect to the sewage disposal sy.stem, Bob is not sure that the existing system meets �' current regulations. The records of the Environmental Health Department are not consistent with the information on sewage disposal contained in this submittal. Bob has recommended approval of this proposal with modifications and conditions which will enable the new veterinary facility to meet all applicable Health Department regulations and codes. Those conditions are as follows: "1. Well yield data, chemical tests and bacterial tests be submitted for the barn well. 2. The existing house well be abandoned and properly kept due to its proximity to the existing sewage disposal system. 3. The barn well be properly disinfected and filtered to � ensure water potability. 4. The existing septic tank be pumped and examined. If in metal tank, it should be replaced with a concrete one, ; as metal tanks have been a prime cause of premature septic system failure. Proper baffling on inlet and ' outlet t's also be verified. i . S. The drywell should be reconnected in parallel and fed by � a distribution system equalizing flow. E�. That the boarding kennel operation be limited to ten (10) and the caretaker accommodations for the assistant be limited to a 1 bedroom apartment to prevent sewage flows irom exceeding the design capacity of the existing sewage system. 7. That kennel plans conform to codes of the Colorado Department of liealt}i and to be rcviewed by this officc." Memo: �nsign/MacMichael � � Fage Three • • • July 25, 1983 Pil.arening Office and Planning and Zoning Commission's Comments and i2ecommendations Iiaving considered the growth impacts attributable to this proposal, j we anticipate only negligible impacts on facilities and services. � FJe have concluded that the exemption requested from the commercial t GMP is appropriate. 'Phe veterinary clinic use is compatible with the purposes of the AF-2 zone district and we do not anticipate any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood. This of course is assuming compliance with all applicable Health Department regulations and codes. i Because the existing residential structure and most�of. the property � lies within the Highway 82 200 foot setback, we were initially • ' reluctant to support a change in the use of this property to a i less restrictive category. However, the Planning and Zoning � Commission came up with some convincing arguments. ? , � The Planning and 2oning Commission considered the proposal on June 21, 1983. They felt that the impacts associated with this commercial use would be quite low, not substantially greater than the impacts associated with the residential use. The Commission considered the adverse impacts associated with the location of the existing buildings within the 200 foot setback and decided that since there ', • would be no expansion of those bui].dings, the community would not � experience an increase in adverse impacts as a result of permitting this proposed commercial use. In addition, they found the applicant's arguments compelling with respect to the benefits to the community of locating the veterinary clinic closer to the agricultural/ animal hiisbandry operations which the clinic serves. For these ' reasons the Commission approved the exemption from the Commercial j GMP and an employee dwelling unit. They recommended special � review approval of the use subject to the fol.lowing conditions: l. There shall be no expansion of the buildings on the � �: property; 2. The parking area shall be screened and all existing vegetation preserved; 3. The applicant shall maintain the irriqation of the meadow; , 4. Parking shall be prohibited on the paved apron; 5. All apgJ.icable health standards must be met to the satisfaction of the Departlnent of Environmental Health; and �� 6. The employee unit shall comply with the employee dwelling unit regulations. ` . t A�fter considering the comments of the Planning Commission, the P':canning Office decided that it concurred with the Commission's fii.�+dungs. We recommend approval subject to the above conditions. (I � � . S . . ' . , ,'' . .... . . � — rc:;o EXHIBIT � � Suv3�cc � � � � I • E:_li. H ' „ ) �a � � ' APl'Et+DIX D PI'�'��zY COC��:11Y pROJECT 11UMIIER S��t�a�i��r«� -i�4;�:' � • , r•:j;:`:;� - .- Alarch 3 1983 .:��i LAt7D USk: APPLIC1TIOtJ FOFtM bhTE �UQ:4ITTED , � � T � _T . . TO BE CO}1PI.:TED B1C APPLIGL'�T: ' i t1n1Re Tbnald H. �nsi�n[ Susan Afacltichael ' � hUDfU:SS 710 E. Durant, Aspen, Colorado PHOFE 3U3/925-5?S� NA?IE OF PROJECT 13G85 Hi�hway 82 � PftQ7ECT LOCATIOtt: (On attzched sheet, locate on zoninq map, shovinq bo�ndaries � of any natural hazard and resource areas, any other special � regulatory districts, &ection S, Land Use Code; and locate on appropriate CSU/ERA Ftaps any areas not covered by the above.) To'r� nttE� 3:148 ac. � ' EXISxI►.� uSE;s) Residential/Horse B�arding � " " I PROPOSen usE(S? �11 anima.l clinic in ea.isting house, 1,286 square feet � (approximat= sq�care footaye for cach) Dog boardin� kenneZs in ezisting garage, 792 square feet Horse surgery �in existing barn, 775 ss�uare feet PRESENT ZO:tIt.G OF SI1'E pF_� � AESCF.I�TION OF LAND USE PRUPOS�L See Attached ' i'r TO BE CO:iPL.:T°D 3Y. T}{E ?L�llf:�It:G OFcLCE � . �� ,� �? Y'YPE O° APPLICITION': R.ZOUZi]G SUDDIVISION Ii P.U.D. F..XE:-iPTION �� ' ' g SPECIAL R£VIEW 35-acre + SULIDIVISIO:J ;, j_j IIUILQiNG PER:4IT EtEVIEii ? ' F.L•ViE:•7 °i�1S°: °?�-�1OPLICII'fC"! D11Tc CO:i^L�TF.J GEHE.^�I�L SUD:tIS.°,If;P1 P.C. ACTIUt� DATE DOA(2D ACTLO:t DA'l'F. • DETi.F?.£D SUi::1L.r,.",IO�t P.^: ACi IO:! UA7'E DOnftD ACTIO:1 DATG F1hVlL TL1T IIOAPD ACTIOtI DAT£ • . ..�, . . . . . . . EI . . . , , . . . ; ; � � i . } � . . � , -• . : i � � ' i • • • � . : . ' . i DESCR.EPTION OF LAND USE PROPOSAL � . ; • I This General Submission is a request to use the property at 13685 � Highway 82, as a "Kennels & Veterinary Clinic" for Lou Deguine, a � use allowed by "Special Review". (Pitkin County Code 3-3.33). The I � prop�rty is currently residential use (three unrelated roommates) � • and horse boarding. It has been on the market for a year and a . ; half at appraised value and as yet no offers have been received, probably because of its proximity to the highway. Allowance of the proposed use would permit sale of the property and provide a needed � service central to the upper valley with little or no influence on the surrounding area. �` �, The Vicinity Map locates the property on the north side of Highway 82 between Watson Divide Road and the Woody Creek turn-off. The ! I. General Plan map shows the property in more detail as it exists a.nd as proposed. The 10fl-ft, setback, as shown, passes through the house. However, the back door of the house would be the entrance to the clinic from the parking area so that no outdoor clinic activity would occur outside the setback. APPLICABLE POLICIES ' . y SceniQ Quality .._ . � There will be no impact on scenic guality as no changes to the out- ; sides af buildings or site features will be required. A small sign ' i at the entry will be necessary for identification only and wou2d ' , . . . . • ' ' ' .. \ • , � i . . • � . . . � ; � . �, � . II • t s . 1 � � . , • • � . � . 1 .. � • . . . ' • . � . � � � k confmrm to the county sign regulation. {5-5U0.2b maximum 6 sq.ft.j ` � I maximum 6 ft. high). l i . I � Water Supply i The property is served by two wells, one for the house and one for the barn, and are located on the general plan. They have been � tested recently for both bacterial count and delivery rates, and are on file with the Environmental Health Department. Discussion with Bob Nelson indicates that water demand for the proposed uses ' _ . ; will probably be close to or less than current residential use. ' ; . i Sewage Disposal ; . i � •The sewage disposal system includes a 1,25Q-gallon septic tank , i which drains into two 6' x 12' dry wells in tandem as shown on the general plan. Records for these facilities are also on file with � the County Environmental Health Department. Inasmuch as water { demand will remain essentially the sam.e, there will presumably be no additional �sewage. Impacts on Road System Lou Dequine's veterinary practice involves more than half his time making house calls in the mobile vet unit to horse clients in the morning and early afternaon. Tt►� remainder of the day is spent at the• clinic with small animals, where he normally receives six cli- i ents per day and on unusually heavy days may see as many as eight. In additioo, clients will bring horses to the clinic at an estima- . ted frequency of three horses per day during the summer and drop- ping to one horse every other day during the winter. Also, with , , . � . • f ' ' . � ' � � 1I , {. ' . . • 1 ' . . ' � � .. ) � � . � . i � { � • • � ' • I • , � accommodation for boarding ten dogs, whose average stay will be one • � • � week, additional trips will be generated primarily on weekends. • . . ; , Lou and his assistant currently drive from down valley to the exis- � ting clinic in Aspen. In the new proposed Iocation, his assis- � tant's commuter trips would be eliminated (she will live at the � f clinic) and Lou's commute will be down valley from his home in Snowmass instead of into town for a net reduction in trips. Final- ly, with the facility located mid-valley rather than in Aspen, all , up valley trips will be intercepted in Gerbazdale and additional down valley trips will be generated from Aspen with no net change in total trips on Highway 82 except the elimination of commuter trips. *Trip Summary (One trip is defined as an arrival or departure from the clinic) . . A.M. Mid-Day P.M. Total � Lou's Commute � 0 � 2 Lou's House Calls • 1 � 2 Assistant's Trips (11on-Commuting) 0 0 2 2 Horse Clients 0 0 6 Summer 6 .5 Winter .5 Small Animal Clients Q . 0 16 16 Boarding Clients (10 Animals, 2 Trips Each per week - 20 Trips per Week - 3/Dayj 1 � � 3 Summer Total 3 2 26 3� � Winter Total 3 2 19.5 24.5 Peaking for the trips occurs approximately equally from 1:30 PM nntil 5:30 PM for an average of 26 trips/4 hours = 6.5 trips per hour in the snmmer and 19.5/9 = 4.9 trips per hour in the winter ' . � and a net reduction ot trips on Highway 82. *.7rip generation assumptions are from Lou's estimates. , .. • t� • � . ` i . . � i i � % J �'��'' 1 ' � �---�� f `�� : F i,. �,. % ` �l y �`'in l V'�.` C. •'`.' � �; � _ �` . .c �\ � � �. .: -. '• ' �� ;� ` .-�� ., �.* �.,� r, o, ��. ,ti�. -/� ).,�. .� T`�-; � U fJ ', �. _ Q.rj �. _ -�,� . ,�:1` � �.� . � �.� i ,�'• - n;�,�-� - _ _ �;_�� - ��o� �� ,�� . o��;. ��r ,1 ;� �; �5- . ., � ' - �� . � .�► /r � � .' i " � ,�.:l.( I oc�y �' �• - +'`-\5r, �+`;' j ' �/, � ' / /��/^,�,�!1:1 �. _'. • � . .:� r�-- .�. , � ; , � .pt�`�� i , j.' _,`�.��:I __ ' _ ._ .�✓��--�� ! � --- � .� - ;� .. ��' .�4�%•l�� /.:1._. 4Z/ ?�. - ,��.�.�� --�,!`� ' ` � / ' �!, / ' ~ � "`��--�.� -- . 1-• . � r.;:::'•�;'��r . - -�, ,L�_ _� 6' �, �-�..��.�� ^ �� :�" � n`t/- ;.i� �_.: _ �'� � � � P.. �: ' "I ' • - � \' /� �''� �� ,/.=- . .J:-1� a , ' ,. ; - , � _ -- -- , -•. 1 �;. j . �, --_�- t � --- ','�' � � �/�oo.=. \ -�� 1, ;t�' ,;�, ;�_ . i o6I�/� 4 � _ �( � '�. �`?" �� -- '� � ' �,�`;�(f 3Q ,; � ,GF :_� . �' ! . . .I , ,,'/ -__ . 1 ;.. '�: .'�� 7 ^ � t ). � ' ' �'�' �� ;��1 1' r✓ ` 'j 'i/� -'l.^,, - . � • '� �l��.I i �o;�•- . � � . � - .'�-i, �-_".- .I . �.� � !1. ,r �',�(r �° �, �`� �' .- `�.', ��,`i 1_. i J� /�� • ' •\ "�ti}� � ��)-. ''�.` �� ., .\� � l.i� .i,5��,� �� ;� . _ ��-1 ;:, ,y I r ��-. _ �. :y. =�=%:-' � :,;,�:; � ' i� ��i�`i/ 1 , - � ' ` . __.a..y� �'<'.�;,__r , � i ��. � ,•�', )' ��. • '�`1 , �� -;, ��: ��.•.��. __ .� / �•( :�/ �2' . ..• .' �,��,/ '�� '��::�\ '�i-,'" •• .\� I fy F_._ ` -' �_�- _f�_ I _ ;•r �� .^•� _ � i� �'ll•.`\`//"/�f .'V :� . .. `\'; -^ '"� J + l I'l� � . 1' '�i� ::�c � .�-� � _ . ' -� �� 1/i �� •\., /:� �.--_(\�� __�'�� '.00.' - ' , I �� `� �� ' �,'�f�( ��:i \\ �� I \� � %'/(" �'.. -= i . :e. / � i�� .! � �l•, • _ _ •��:� '�� .. �, r '`� �� ''I; _ �i��:t' :'.i�':��- � ��' �% � � �_ � ^��t�•1��I ' � �\�� i . �'t.,l - i _' ' I � � � �o �\ �\\. .�% :•.�`.z-. ! � . � � '� , i �.. '>;\ `�. \: :.. '� :j . .\�, `,`i pll !� "-'/� - '�� (� f'./ � ��r� t� �r .--;�,^�l\;� i �5.,,.�1 ^_ �`, �--`-�� `.i'. ` �� _ i' �• ��.� i __ ! � �y: —�l �'"� uG:. .~��-. �;;____ �I \�y_ _,_ ; � � , �rf�-.��;�=�:;"_ � _-- -�=`��-g�� -��-,�� -�`\\\\- = 1 / "��. � / � �"_'� ` � '�'d.''`!�` ��'�° 5I -�r-y�'a�t ��`-�_ - -i.' i J i :'�J �` - �� C �� . - �...s��oo`-i.'---- '" ' .- d�' �`_ ;i i��."% - <�� 1��`%�`=. � r �.\_�'�!.1�� J%`.:.._�!i ,:.� I ,%� -":_ ' �v" � ( . �•,C� / i'.t�-'_:c.o_ \ \ //'� ` �.J'�' - -:- ,7� , �� - .\ � ��_ ! -_-,~.. �. '� �_�,�� :_ _ .• ' o x /� r ��:� _i?c -✓ j'��:,♦ // _� `,�� , .: '- f..�"�.. ^"i� �t, 1 : r/ ,�D/ . ` Li�'=. � ..��`'1: ' ��'�� `' �EP�S �f� - '_ r w .' l `�^ "•�` �;Zr- _- e /,t.i-�,�f,-� � - ,��';i� � - ,. - i� _ ` y�S� I=��S�i� -- - /� t` .!✓' i '��. ✓�:_ � '�� r -F.--:_.� •� �''�- _'--: �a�`� -,� ��"---'_ _ � � - _ . .�.� , - � . - � :.� :� ='•-' .��` ��' ,%= __ ,_�� - _ . ' __ _ � - -_ - -' r i , _ --;,. ,r= •.,- ,�.,�-``�--�', , . . ��' � t /�, , �o '�:� i J%`-,- !� ��. '� . .j_\��", , - � - i . -,_, } �-�_: �,� �L� .j .- _'-% " - " ' / :�; •� �T i lJo��L--i� .. .��`�•• ./,r - , .l.__ _ �..:)� _ Ji�1,��' //� �i'� 1-"; ��l�. � b`� .� C. .�r.\r; � i'1...�. � . o l - . ' f �' ��. = _' ,`•� ` �c -I • r - �.� _ • �I $ . '� ' �� _ ,:�:�i'.� � �: __ �3.�: _ �� - _ _ /�r •, 3' � - `J\ . _o � /.� O � `,^ _ ' •�. �+ ,'. _ i �` � •tc ' .$` N ' �' / �;{ �`' / � �_ _{�y • �s` , �'� •� � �� E , _ - 1 . \�; � _�.(, :�.. ` �," _a¢ - '} �- � �'t . -;i ' •r. . '� -- - ' �'Q,� _- �.. �-!� �-i -`--i. / �_ �� •�__ _ ^f'_' __-' t`r'.. .a _ �ry � ___ _ ` _ ' _-� .�. r//, 'f yr � _- ' �`. _ -_ -: _ _ � — --- ' ---�— — ^ � — � . • ' ' 'L; / �`ti's!�. ;. -- _ . - — ---_ . - _ %�,�� - : ° ; � •.'�.,, t�: .:-��;- ;``_ � -w- � j'=Q �� .= ^,p�\\�•'` pp 1 i _ ^_� '� �.� �1 .. i . y�l .r �. �/�' ,b _ '• i,�...�'... �r�s�/�.� .-� .� "-� \`.\ r : �0 _ / � �•.! .� .. �' -!.:-�c� �/ '�,J\.�:-� ' I � �� .' _- �'/' �_ �ti • ;,��" /��=�.-. yi r�'""�'"��-� � :�,�::?" ---___ . /�i�� ti �;I � . � ��-..' -..� . � � I � ��ii.`: = � : , , I..''` % , .-+"-` " _� ✓' �, ,� .�;�^'.�.�, �`� � � - . ��4p[1 �/'N � �i ,_ .._. �Y^ ' • .:�`— ,,._ i. . / � � " � - "=.'1�- �� , 1, , . � �� ' /� . : � '� _ _ - :-� � � � -;�, 1� /` . -%:---� - � �. .. �.��.,_. �i ,; � �l_; - - ��. ,.`._'`.� r. :� � . - :i . . _a - -- - "`-_ - �, 1 '•`-'�. :.•t� 1':. , � - - -- __ �- ��':�' .. . :�: / ti _� �- - : , . , _ / ' : • - /� , � . � ,• _ ..• . .• �--�-- � - - �.._.�---"+- ---' _: ' �•-- --�- _.. ._.__ -- - - - . ��__-•--- ----�- . - .�- -- ' �� l -� -- . /�'\��_, ( �`--.� \ " „ [')� � � / .�/ / ' r^ \� 1 ��r`v , _ \ � � 4� �' � . ��G4.. `��C• � � J�..4 � .` . -'- . � � . � � �\.I � �1.. ``�'. �. �- � ��-< < �,, '� _ � , . �� .�...__ ' ' - � ; ORTHOP�DIG ASSOCIATES 4F ASPEN AND GLENW40D fiobert R.Ocfen,M.D. Rodney E.Kfrk,M.D. James K.Weever,M.O. John R.Freeman,M.D. r��.::J ("� �::'. . �. ., FrankJ.Cipriano,M.D. 3'?�i:�:i CG. Robert S.Derkash,M.D. Pu��1ic '^ •-- D;,'t.o EXHiBIT June 15, 1983 /! Sub3 cc � V Fyr,. rr _�� Lou DeQuine Box 1Q426 Aspen, CO $1612 Dear Dr. DeQuine: � It was indeed a pleasure to read your letter of 19 May 1983 in which you signified your hope�ul intention of establishing a large animal hospital facility in the valley. ' As per our discussion, I think that the locale you have ex- perienced interest in, i.e. the Gerbaz homestead at I3685 Highway 82, is a most ideal spot . It can serve Glenwood as well as Aspen. With an increasing large number of large animals, including � horses as well as cattle attd the quality of these anima.Is that are now being raised, I think it is extremely important that we have a large animal facility for their proper medical care. Certainly to combine it with a small animal hospztal would make sense. I sincerely hope that you are given the permission to construct this facility as I think it is sorely needed in the area. Sincerely, v��,' r. R`obert R. Oden, M.D. RRO/cr � � ; , 100 East Main Streat 111 Trauma L.ane 2001 Blake Avenue ; Aspen,Colorado 81611 Snowmass Village,Colorado 81615 Glenwood Springs,Colorado 81601 (3031 925-4141 (3031 923-2068 (303)9Afi•8683 ' (Accounti�g:Aspen Office} 9 � : � . . �'ord Sch-��a.a�azi. ; . . ; r�or,rn c�� c�, ;. . PITR_Til Cft, Public F1c�r9.r.^; ' Dato EXHIBIT June 13, 1983 5ub�c � � � Er.�i. 5-�3 To Whom It May Concern: T wish to urge approval of the Gerbaz Homestead at 13685 Highway 82 as a veterinary hospital. There is a par- ticularly pressing need for a large animal hospital fa- � cility in this part of the vall.ey. On two recent oc- casions we have had to have surgery performed on our horses which among other things entai.Zed use of anes- tY►esia and a proper operating room environment. In one instance the surgery took place in Carbondale, and the other took place at a barn below the Brush Creek road. i i � The Gerbaz Homestead is a very accessible location and, as envisaged, has the potential to not only accomodate ! large animal care - as well as small - but would also provide a location for a much-needed kennel . It is my understanding that Dr. Dequine would maintain the rustic appearance of the homesite and thus diminish whatever visual impact this facility would have unon , the scenic corridor. Indeed it may actually enhance the same. Most sincerely, ! / V� � Ford Schumann Bo�406 7, g$pa�, coio. 8 i s i i ' ,�, �� k_...�. .�.,.�. �.�._. _ .__.___ �f, � r ��L/��-� �u�. . __ �2 �5" /d0 �c�' '; �C�L�6tC-�t� �G`'� ' EXHIBIT �� i ' _ n- _� � � �- °� :: l� �i� � ' s - 3 ' ' ) r , ' �1 . kC� tilQ ��LGZd- /!iv(-.�%l�ttit,�� ; . � . ��,Q � � A � r i .°j'�(l1 �G�'•C ��'�� /tiJ GC '�.7 Gr � (� `i��n�. C�'Ze.�LG�. * � � l � ��i�.c� y� � �� . �--� ��.�� /�.e. �``� ; - G�, v1.lLV1 u�tc� a..o�� `'�. . ..�f��l/�C.Q V(1�� `��2 C!/J G�-�Q, -"��,� 1 ��c-�(/ � ,�� `� l�u� c�c(' �� --C�� -y �u , �� ,�Q � l.� , �°�� ' . � . �G'L�� 1�. �GZ��J �.t� . . ,/�� . u� o� %�� :iGGrZ�x��cr�u �G•LrJL�� ,� ea��c,�y � �.v�, �x� 1 ♦ /,�/ � C�u� � _ _ _ _ . ; , , ' . , .��..,�... . � ,5 \ � � �C�, �.�-Lr�� l2�, �� -�-� dc , � � . - � � �� !� 1�4�� .�. ��.,� ; /� �, , ; 'e�C.GGY.fiL� �.Ch�;, � ��,t, �'��.Q �:ltz Gt- � / � �� M,cJ (�� -G��-4,� t�%c�c-u � � � � ; vLC�v ' /�-�-u- � { � � �� '�� . � � � � � � ` � r-- � c� `��s %� c�J � � �,�j� .�,��L �'�G�'"�' � ��'�rL / � a- � , . �tiz� 2�� ; tv �Y�L ��u� Z�e 7�a-,ce �ac.e � � , . . � `��w� iLe '� � - �✓� . �---�� : / L �� . � � �� ' � - / �u�� /� �� . . _ . _. ___.__ _ . _ _ _ . � � , . � � �y / /'� rnr�r,� c_� co, c;. . ; . ! � � Jlut�crl� C.a�llc M Tl:I+ C G- ; �Q .�: 7L167 r`:�'11 EXHIBIT ' � ,�� C� J 8161I ,`.`° � : �cn, o orn o ` �ti��j.c ,.:.,l. z '7 —7.S—fr 3 ��C�K E�1lC.., L !�t�-c- C�t��.Cc'iL �a � �. , � d ,�/ � ��.�u �o�� < �� L � ,,G - � , tGd� � - J`��i2c2�fGP� � � �- d �t"lL�� /.� � �.��° �'j� lc'-+�� -'- G ,/ � " ��—�. 11,..G ,��L� s� �� -� � ��sc�—�. , 6 � � LC��. C��iu�iue�� c_CE' C1.C�_�c. ..---� G��L li' ✓L � .P�;¢� �`.`��.,�' -�Gt.,� C`t�� JS�zGQ�I�'_�Q___,. �C � � � r ` � �%�� . �l.�L E � ��CC-e-�- • - .. � � � � r�-��e� �—�:�� / � � �L e'�C �� 1�C�%L�' � . �G�-tc-l�?�� . 4G�' ,.. � . _�2��°P -�� -c� t ' � � �� -�ct'�e_ �� _ �� _ � - . . . ��, , . � ��Q-u-- , � � �� ,� k�� : �� . .. � ' ; 1 � � � _ _ .._ __.. .. . , ��CC _ '�`�� ' �-s /�'�� ,� .� .Q� �Y�.��7� t�'� `rlsp 1��,� � a 7rL L� /�'i� ��jn,� EXHIBiT ,-� � �T 1 ! J � 7 3 S-�3 h /' ,G� � �re �/s 3rZ�/6rr 7Ji� � .� / � � �� l�er� � ��.� /� �rs� �� °�tc CGns�er � / o�',ar�r� �a� S� � �rTs �s'� a.r Yh.s �(eZle �` /��° � G �.//.5�� f'G�irr�� /kaS�� . 1 � y �.,�i � �� QVi�es �rtf- �a�� Pr�'ensiv� J � � . ��e � �tl�,l�� n�.��/l aQ.�"r��I.� . /11e�c� , C4t� n� 1� ^n �s "'�S �� s�r�e37r�c� l.�.�u j� ; � � ,� ) � bQ /r�a��. e��,�-[i��Z G.Z � �a�rQ Q Cs,�.s��(eX devo�c_c� S�p/�� a l��i�'v4� Se�vi[PS. y T Y � _J J � ean i c�eir- ,�Tli 'Tsie [zn i,�r�v�r es.s d 7�re i r � s � O 4►ri�'s /s� rsC+I �J¢t i s�a r�� - .f�� CGn l�Cr�'en�E n ' � -/� / J 1- , !o ,�SiOri4J%SJ►1`f /Gi�%G�CO 4Jo�V�!/ � f�11G��"rs� T� P � � a�� il� �'�s•o��en�s . � .� _.�/ �zws , .,. . :, . . co. c;;_..., .. y �:� �r�;._�:r co- . .. _ � -r � , ,-. ._� . � , r� � , . - ,. 7.25.83.......... ^7,��'�.. ��-' : �`}- `� � ENSIGNjMACMICEiAEL `�� i`�::.. ,.�/ �'"'° Slii)j;.i: . .._.�..�.-----.._.. .,F �. �Y_71. 1'O.: �-" i�l � �i r� ,: r�' � i i .�...,.W -- . :M.. �.e`,y�l `� � EXH181T � / r -1S� Box g6 Woody Creek Colorado 81656 June 15, 1.983 Dear Lou, This letter is in support of your plan to develop a veter- inaxy hospital at 136Q5 Highway 82. �°- A facility of the nature you have in mind would certainly �f.; be beneficial to our ranch. We would be able to haul the cattle ' and horses to you to be treated in a clean hospital situation. If necessary, you would be able to keep the a.nfmals there for: _ observation and further treatment, � It is not convenient to take even small animals to your establishment in town. The traffic, the construction in -�he area, the 1 ack of parking all are problems to contend with. We axe confident that your facility will be clean, neat, well-pI anned, and generally an asset to the valley. We hope that you are successful in this endeavour. V_e�y truly you�s, `-`%�f� i' �- / ..1.��;/`'� ��..� . � � ��?J� �- Wayne Vagneur Vagrieur Ranch Company � 7.25.83 . . •:::� ::.:_ : ENSIGNjMACMICI3AEL .._ i: ..... ...t'��.� ...... ... ... . .. ��,s.� .,a:;,.a�s =r,:c;.=.v:a•�s�..z�bt: fzt� i:tr� � - Y_.....�-_.,T.._._..__.._ --�-=----._____.�__ _-- �- - r -- • V & S EXCAVATING INC. • ' BOX 2837 j;;tij�11 C�;-� f;�. l ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 PHONE 925J941 PITI:�'i C('• ; Public D�to E�BIT sub3cc � � ��``��l r �'r.t,. N S Ff3 . . � �{�l� GvP�t�l�ti y �<s c�{--�`�i� i�u S c��v��' � � � C/s��c� �Lr e: (,'rr��'�•.�� iresyt=�� ` �..vf-��e��.� �1�s� ; - �� 1�,��v �p��a� �f l��' � , �� /Y'jU6q�z�� . /`f' �5 �� 1 Q!'�� SG�IT.¢-�Y,� i�d�- �� orop� w`�w l��e �rw-� v�/c� i �� /"<cGr.�TU/��sL-� �.�.'�f? -!� G'GtT a'(��fJ� �et� '�` / � r `U�s�� ,��,�y �s�� ,�1�, � /� � �'� �e.�-� /5 •'� �r'�l[��S' //U�GtiC�f /� LG�D u�i{� G�eone3 s�1�f10�3t�p>`C� -e��l.U�'1-r� /�Gt�G� ��'�r��e�rJ%. ��V �� t � � , �re Do�-s% �07� `is�-ar� s� �i.�l -� �'�y�rdc�oc� '� � � �°�-' '`��e Se,evt�,�s , �� ` �<L/ 22c�c�� ; 1``I P S li� 7-2c�uc 7�a�i e.c 7x��G � �� ` ��, � y :, ; � ��1 �c� ��ol•r��. /�- �s � '�� 1Ve e�� {lii�� , ��'``� ' � • . T:,':�) �,.. �_ • � .. . . r�h�tti: EXHIBIT ��o huu do�lkin erlterprises SL'l�j��t � � £r1i. 2.'0 "ol S'�s�� June 12�1983 Dear Lou� We are very much in favor of your new clinic to be located at the Gerbaz Homestead ( �3685 Highway 82) . As horse owners we know the need for a large animal hospital in a location that is close to Aspen�especiall,y when we need to haul a sick or injured anmmal for surgery^or x-ray. What a wonderful use for an old home, that although charming has little appeal as a country home due to its close proximity to the highway. A veterinary clinic will retain the rustic look of the area and not disturbsatimic corridor concept. Most of all it will provide a much needed service to the community. A convenient kennel is also needed in this part of the valley, especially on a major access road. So, we wish you luck with your project and please feel free to use this letter or our names in support of grour clinic . �incerely yours� -..�-Z,�.�..(� /��j�=��-�.--�- Caro and E D i � bi�u Aopkin rnterprises • box 4696, espe►i, colorrrAo R7611•� (3031�t%�F88C�6 925—']'�8$ MOON RUN OUTFITTERS � � � WIL(�ERNESS PACI(TRIPS Box 5754 SNOWMASS VI��A�'jE�CO.8161 S 30'f�923-4945 .Tune 7, 1983 b0/1RD Ob' C0. CO:::.�`i�':i PIT3CIN C0. Publi EXH{BIT Dato � Subjoc To whom it ma.y concern; E�_h. I1 'i1-s We are in fa.vor of a proposed animal hospital facility �ocated a.t the old Gerbaz homestead. Since our livlihood depends upon livestock, we would consider this convenience inva.luable. In the past we h�.ve lost animals� or had them perm�.nently injured because of the inconvience of hauling them down valley. We would support whole heartedly this facility, and it's location� both for convience and appearance. Sincerely submitted, Doug and Holly McLain 1 `_ 1 } , r,;,r::^,n o� c;,. • .. : . ; . .PTTRI'� r. . P�:b13Q iiear:r.._ . �"`o EXHIBIT Sub3�c � � ?'lL. PI 'a S �3 June 8, 1983 T am wriCing this letter to express my supgort for the use of the Gerbaz Homestead at 13583 Highway 82 as a vet- erinary hosp3tal. At present there is no large animal hospital facility iin the valley and i feel it is a necessity, for both those owners of large and small pets. There is a great need for this type of animal hospital, and kennel, in the lower part of our valley. The Gerbaz Homestead, I feel, would provide a good location for hauling livestock to, as weZl as good access during bad weather. A veterinary h��pital there would reduce trips into town or down valley through the trecherous Phillips Canyon road. Also, the hospital would permit this old home to mainta3n its rustic appearance, thereby sus- taining the aesthetic character of this scenic locale. Thank you for your attention. Vary tru yours, L��' _ ' �j�-�` Jon Hollinger JH/ec RED MOUNTAIN HORSE CENTi RE Box 2389 Aspen,Colorado 81612 Telephone 303/925-9861 -1659 ,v._.,-- ...._. �...�.., .._., .T...-....n..,.�,..._..-. , .. �.�,- ..__.. .._.,,__..�.._...___._,.__ ----�--------___._.....�_ . .___ ......._ _......,_. ..- . � . ' • � Wm. C. Siapleton Agenq, I�c. i�� 533 E.HOPKINS AVENUE ASPEN.COLORADO 81611 TELEPHONE 303-025•1230 r.:-�---, . P.?bl�.c. T- L:;c EXH�BR June 11, 1983 subj:;c�; � � F_.r�, rro _�5... 3 , i Zb Whom It May Concern: i i I'm writing this letter to voice rr{y opinion towards changing ! the zoning of the Gerbaz house located at 13685 Highway 82, Pitkin County Colorado. � � I feel the Valley is i.n need of a large animal hospital facility, a.nd the convience of a good kennel complex, and this will provide an ' excellent location for both up valley and down valley residences. � It will keep the house and baxn in the same tradition as earlier ! times in the valley and I belive Dr. Dequine to keep the house '� in its quaint rustic style that everyone so loves here. ! The accessibility for hauling large animals to the clinic could � not be more convenient especially in bad weather. � Sincerely, � WILLIAM C. STAPLETON AGENCY, INC. Ik I � �-�n Don N. Stapleton � ! i i i i June 14, 1983 I favor allowing Lou Dequine to use the old Gerbaz Homestead at 13685 High�vay 82 as a veterinary � hospital. T feel there is a need for a more convenient large animal treatment facility in this � area particularly for horses and 4-H project animals. I would suggest that efforts be made to preserve the existing large trees and irrigated pasture land. bol.:T) ��:�? r,o.. t:r;...: :. ., I'�[TI;ITI CG. PubliC � - DONALD H. R.AYBU Dato ^ �HIB1T Sub�ac � '�1 L � � v ��r,., x 3 ' � ` � . ; k i i I � t , t '' i i . { � �. MARTIN SCHLUMBERGER, Builder.BoX 223•Woody Creek,co.81656•303/923-2337 � i 4 ! As a property owner in the IJoody Creek area, I hereby wish to advise j I that I support the use of the Gerbaz Homestead at 13685 Highway 82 as a � veterinary hospital. I run cattle and horses on my property and feel that the animal hospital facility is much needed in..tnis valley. The location in question is particularly convenient in winter and summer and is most desireable as it is f in a non congestive area. '} !/�.,,%.,�; �,-�1�,f,c-�•..-_C�-r3,.cy��. Martin Schlumberger �// . i 's � � � i �. FiO.?F.D G_� i;0, �,:::. . __•., PITI.I?I CQ. r`�li EXHIBIT • Dato � D Sub3o FY�,. �� S"83 �: I i � � � � . � I ' I ,• M • . p . " � , / � ` � � � � t� �� / • � i . ,' J < / , , - / // � � . / /�, � ' /1 " i � � � . / . J� i i ,�,. � � / ''/�t. - / ;,/ . . .� � ,� � ��. /i �;. � � , � ► � • � , / , >�A � � � � r � : .f .- . � , // , � � , r /, , / /;,�, , � / °�" ' / / / i � `i � i ;. � /� i J / / / � / , , � � , ,f ,, , / ;. . � , / , "� � � /� � � � d /�J , /f! . . , ,�r J� , �/� , �, � � � . .� � /� / ♦ , I,, , � .� _� • �� :�- ,` � / � � . /,� . , , � i i� s � • ,, , � �� ,� . � ' � , „ ; r� %a � � . �� ,. / � _/� � . ,. � ' � / � � �� , /� , � i . � � I / i � � , � � � � i ��i , i ;�� ., , . j /� �� / , , �, ��, � � � � .,i 1 ;.�, , �A � <j � , � , .. i � / � �� /, ,, � • /�� / ' ,i - i � �� , � �� " ' ' � " I� � � � � � ' � ` � � i i� i : � �/� � i !�I� !J , . �� / I " � � ` '� �,,� � y / �„ / �� , .� - � � � . i ! , � /� ♦ � � �r � � .� : . ,� �/� IA , �� , � , , ,�, , ;� � , , , , , /� ., < l� � � � / ' � '� ' � � � �� - � �i . � � �/ 1�i � - , �� .- �� / / � , � ,, ' i / , / / / ` / ,/ �I i /, � / � / � �. Jume 12, 1983 • EXHIBIT Pitkin County Commissioners � Pl.anning and Zoning Board Aspen, Colorado , Dear Sirs, We would like to highly recommend agproval being granted to Dr. Lou DeQuine in his purchase and use of the Gerbaz Homestead on Highway �82 as a Veterinary � Hospital. We have know Dr. DeQuine an hoth a personal and profes�eional 1eve1 � for nine years and feel that he will successfully fill the need for a � Veteri.nary Hospital�dov�ri valley. Presently there is not a Large Animal � Hospital in the valley and by having a Small Animal Hospital and Kennel in -: j this down valley locativn patients would not have to drive into Aspen on i Highway #82. There is a substantial number of large and small animal . owners Ylown valley who use Dr. DeQuine�s services. We are confident that Dr. DeQuine will maintain the rustic look of the - ' house and barn. Having the property used in this manner is much�_more appealing that a new commercial structure. The easy access to the highway makes it very desirable- for patients to get horse and stock trailers into the hospital yet there won�t be a potential traffic problem due to the width of the road in � that area. � t I We consider Dr. DeQuine and his family to be an asset to the community. i Dr. DeQuine is a person endowed with high standards of integrity and � resonsibility. ; � Any considerations given to Dr. DeQuine will be greatly appreciated by the � many people he has helped. We can recommend Dr. DeQuine and his proposed animal hospital without reservation. � Sin erely, � y�� 4�� ; ,.�� ,�. ,`�' ��,' Mr. & Mrs. Robert F. Si ons + . Aspen. Colorado : t _ � Y S i . i � f � . i � � .. � , ' 4. ` , . } ��aZ . _ . . . ._ . _ , �v�n tss c�,�sk, ' , ♦ . i Ma�y 19, 1983 � BOARD OF C0. COt�il�d'R'S PITKIN C0. GUIDELINES FOR SUPPORi' LETTER publio ' EXHIBIT naze � Sub�oo �n.. N -a s 3 Please write a letter on your personal ietterhead stat ione ry (and have ty ped , if poss ib le) ind icat ing y our � support f or the use of the Cerbaz H omestead at 13685 H ighway � 82 as a veter inary h os pita 1. P lease limit y our re mar ks t o one page or less . The ' ; f ollowing are s ome suggested reas ons f or y our su pport - ' please use any others y ou may� th in k of a ls o. . � 1) Need f or a large anima 1 h os pita 1 fac ility in the � valley (there is none at present) . . � 2) Good location for hauling live�tock to. Convenient ? and g ood access wh ich is e s pec ia lly important in . j bad weather . � 3) Need far and convenience of a small animal hospital in the lower part of our va lley . 4) Need f or a convenient kenne 1 in the lower Rart of our va liey . � 5) Th is is. an exce llent use f or an old h ome that has • � � lost a lot of it 's a ppea l because of iis c lose pr ox imity t o the h ighway . Th is way it w ill be in . its rust ic qua lity rather than t orn d own and re placed by a modern structure . ' i 8) � It w�ll mainta.in the country and rustic appearance ! of the area - this wi.11 he.lp maintain the scenic � c orr id or c once pt . 7) 1Yi11 reduce ybur trips ir��o town ar doivn valley ' thr ough Ph illips cany on . 8) It w ill add t o the se lf-suf.f ic iency of the lower � va lley area , reduc ing h ighway 82 traf f ic . � + � Please get this '•letter to me by �une 15th ( I can have it typed if you can furnish your letterhead) . ' Thanks so much f�r your tielp and support . � L Dequ ine B ox 10426 � Aspen,� Colo. 81612. i � � . . .. _ .. .. _ � . . . . � • � . _ • i .,;�. , . .;.. � �" � _ The Aspea Times � . � � ' BOARD OF C0. CO2:S1.i'R'8 . Box E P2T]tIN C0. Publio Hearing T�;hibits � Aspen, Cotorado 7.25.83 Date 's ............ SubJoct = ENSIGN/MACMIC.�iAEL PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ) COP�/ O� NOtIC@ ) as. County of Pitkin � 'public:notice �..�� '� ±� rnswc NoT►cE " RE•r Enaign/Tto¢Miehocl Veterinary Ciinic— William A Dunawa c�°^ge�^u� I, • y (10 solemnly S�t�ear thHC NOTICE IS IIEREBY GIVEN chut a public� . 'hcuring will Ln held beforc the�onrd oC County,. Comm�seioncrn af Pitkin Countx,'Colorado an� Publisher Mondoy;Jul�'1S 19&3 at a mcetm�;to begln ol I am the of THE ASPEN TIMES; 10:00 um in thc G�mmmissionefs Aiecting Noom of that the same is a weekl news a er rinled, in whoJe or in part, lhe Pitkin County Courthousc,606 E dlem Slrcet. Y P P P ;Aepen to coneider a changc m unee�mial rcvica• and ublished in the Count of Pitkin State af Colorado 8I11� IIaS .opprornl for the mmcroion oCa cingle fumily nsi•. P Y r � dencrintoavelerinap ciin(c.Thcsubjcet roperl,v a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been pUb- is zoped AF•2 und ie Ixut�d on the nrn�e�a�or; Highwav 82�between lYataon Di�•ide Road and the� lished continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitkin, woeay Dreck tumoff.For further inforniotionr rnntuct the Planning Otfim.1�0 S Gnlena Strcet;�1 for a period of more than fi[ty-tK o consecuti��e weeks next prior .nRan.n2s-2vzo.�x�2ss. � publication of the annexed le al notice ar advertise- � ,`-'- ;' —s—Geurt;e�fads�n.Chmrmen t0 the first s ��'(3odrdofCaunty.Commiu�oneref ment; that said neuspaper has been addmitted to the United States Yublfshed inthe'Aspen Timeedunc 23;isa3.:.-,:;; mails as second-class matter under the provisions ot the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing ]egal notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. Th9t the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and enlire issue of every� number of said weekly newspaper for the perfod of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated `j�e 23 A.D., 19 83 and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news- paper dated A.D., 19_ � a li �7/�i�i�/��'//G/�/L!/G j L Subscrlbed and sworn to before me,.a notary public in and for the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, this �.day of ! A.D., 1� � CiY��t.�/ GJ '�`�`�' Notary Public ,��' �� _s�� 0 i My commissIon expires f G ; �L , � . �