The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.min.reg.08081983 _.......��.. . :1; ' � ij,a',�. . . i�,:�� f :� � . x <�iv My \� �� • �T� ��2', ��F�F^.�t r� .,� 1,..y�L�f�'1�y..F� �.. . � .. a-i:..�tr:a��,•1.5=;_.v��. �... - � ,vn'„�'�..E+a��.`s'`?r��a96uM��'�C+�fete:'�-+t.h+e�it7�.3�{ioY�t�l1�Sr',�.i'�'l.'• L' .�;� ' �"; I 1:� ,•I ;C.:_ .'';i ryn ,-'�� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA - r� ! % �? 8 AUGUST, 1983 v �� , w�� r""''":r''i . � ��{ru - ��-�*'t� LAND USE �r �r.' "` 10:00 a.m. Public Hearing - Aspen Music School 1041 Special Review - 45`=�.,,� "`�'�?' • Alan Richman, Planning �';�;- �.."�,,e,; '"+s.;'.`�� 10:30 Public Hearing - Aspen Racquet Club Special Review - �; �.... µai;�:%� Richard Grice, Planning - `�'�'�;i::: �:..a.,� �':�'��` 11:00 Public Hearing - Expansion of Sundeck Restaurant, Special �°�r��•�-� Review - Richard Grice - ...�.. � ��° ` 11:30 Public Hearing - Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance for '� Senior Housing - Wes Light, County Attorney � , � � Gk , �. 12:00 Lunch Break �{ �'c-.,k�"?::�� N,M1�,*,�.� 1:30 p.m. Public Comment s �. :� �� ADMINISTRATION f :� �='°�'��'3 1:45 Resolutions and Contracts C±;„:;u? t � „ Minutes ' �;�";�� 2ND Read: Supplemental Appropriations - Tom Oken ,, Srewer License Agreement - Pat Dobie "` y`��?"^' Bus Barn/Airport Entrance Contract - Pat Dobie ,� =""i�> Public Works Buildinq Special Review - Richard Grice ��4,ts Aspen Racquet Club Temporary Use Permit - Patsy Newbury _ �t : ,r" 2e'00 Social Services - Mike Schultz, Social Services Direc�or � �?='��'`=' PAC Plan � �'�,�'��.,'�,"cw Memorandum of Understanding; Child Support Enforcement _ �,�� S.O. Assumption of On-Call Coverage ��, f Status Report - Indigent Medical Care �� , � t �- LAND USE x � ,',�.+� ; 2:30 Ensign/MacMichael Veterinary Clinic Continued - Richard Grice � � x . � . �y , 2:55 Break *�� F t a'.,5':, �• g"� 3:00 Siegle Subdivision Exemption - Colette Penne, Planning � x ��`,::: 3:15 First Reading and set Public Heari� • , �,, r Y.,. : .,t,r LUC Amend: Liquor Stores in B-2 Zone District - Richard Grice - y� 12 September, 1983 @ 11:00 a.m. ��:� 3:30 Cheek Subdivision: Park Dedication Fee Refund - Richard Grice r.� � f ��^''�'�� :�.s�i _ _. ---______ _ _ �.�,,., �y, ,��`�`�' '�F ' — +: �'� t ,� y , r � a ,�t`��i f+ fi ..f p �' I�� .-..v ir � �%�" 31�Yw1 'yl,''� �.v r�i.��.� " ij..�J t n.} � n,�` ��n�j,,iz�- � ' I�i tcl�b ,, � �� f ;sc >� } '. . , � .� �� '�,%,l��y .r 5'f��RN al t�yr'Er��J �('�w`3`��i fi r��t5�" T;d 'n�. '�tc�'r.F i 3 j��'� '' t��A k`` ��'1� 1�'srtisY= Ry'fk�3� �4y!,:;Uh, `,� � � x..h ,� � � ��`� �� - ,..�.cdr.,...�......n;d�?�.A;i_��ixt.�5'icr`�F . `t� .T" •4'i' ��` -- .x:t;-.._.,... _ .._:.' __�.�� _•••�,_t.�!.>�.n.a . I � 1 �+t � �f,. `{ iat�r . {:: � � 's� y � � ��:i. # C-A:w��'� V. +r�;�� 1,�-.� `� f° `:5;-..,-� :*:*-�`+� �;�� PITKIN CO[]NTY rx�;. VF^�i'* t�r" � BOARD OF CQ�'A�IISSIOI�RS ^`�:,' ��:...�� ''�+s:+i, � 5;,;=l - ��';j - ':��, ! x;„;'iREG[JLAR MEETING 8 Ai1G[JST, 1983 : ;":,�i";{ ��.',.:iPRESENT: GEORGE MAUSEN, THCMAS BLAKE, MICfIAEL KINSLEY, HELEN KLADIDERUD z�� -�:� ---------- �':;;:r.:I �.:,i;,lPublic The Board convened a public hearing to consider the Aspen Music School, a 1041 it Hearing: ', +,.�,,:Aspen special review application. Assistant Planning Director Alan Rickgnan submitted to the ;'Music =��''School record the Planning Office me�m of 8 August, 1983, the ca�lete application, all �i?�' -.•':; 1041 referral cortments, the Aspen Area General Plan as amended, and the Land Use Code as '�•`.�-':� amended to date. The application was submitted by the Music Associ.ates of Aspen, Inc., �,• � . `d:`��'r� in response to an inspection of the Castle Creek cartipus by the Department of E ` •t._,.: .�...,_ y �ti �� Ernrirorunental Health; the Department wnducted various water sartg�les on the cac�us � : property which revealed major deficiencies in the well water supply syst�n and septic n;,� � a tanks serving the c�rq�us facilities. The sartQles actually revealed contamination o£ i �' ! the water supply due to leachate from the existi.ng on-site wastewater disposal E `I �y-,�i Y 3,{ facilities, and the Department issued an enforcanent action requesti.ng that the f� j ;� Associ.ates eliminate this health hazard. � � �� y�a The applicant subsequently engaged various consultants to address linkage of the ��:� : fi� caaq�us to the City's water syst�n and to the Aspen Metro Sanitation District sewage � i r f� treatment system. The City has agreed to fund the extension of its water system to i I the ca�us, and the Sanitation District has agreed to fund the extension of its � ! i 1' sewer line not to exceed a cost of one hundred and ninety-one thousand dollars � ($191,000). The extension of water and sewer systems to serve greater than twenty �' (20) individuals rern,;res 1041 special review, and the applicant has requested such � � , �,; appmval. � i �� Referral cocmients were generally supportive; the County Engineer addressed the ; °x• construction requirements for activity within a County right-of-way, the applicant � � a '��` Ca[missioner's P'Seeting ° Rucplst, ,19t33 - 1 t' .:{t.i ' . .. � � � .';:M r � �� . � j 'r�7 �� '�. �r '1+, t �' y ':`� � ;:' �5�r� �ht� �:�,ii � +j '^�} � i �j.r� �p�7�}��m'��'�6�C�'�S,,�rr.��t��.�Sr ,txf.�. 4 .,{�fts f .: y,�" k� � rv�� 8� �ry �,7�,i[ �.�� i n � . .nYrFfi�Ni7rl.,!'' t°`'�lVL�'+.-rw..*X*52±'.�.�:�'�idY+�L+l:1tW.fi�f�fuhAAW-iciac4.., w. R $.&.....�5... '�f.`:.J..�...�....��3� ��.. �Yr��: t..:• �.. ��;. " ,j retained consulting geologist Nick Laay�iris to address s].ope stability, and the i,,. ., ;�.r�::,-� Environmental Health Department reviewed the e�ctensions with respect to air/water vi:+;::�.".;. ,`:,_`:�., j� quality inQacts and noise abatement. The application was reviewed by the Planning and ;�":' I �, { Zoning Conmi.ssion at their regualr meeting on 5 July, at which time a recottmendation of roval was made sub'ect to five 5) conditions of record. The Plannin Office ��`: �,=_._�'1 � � c g � .,; � !I reconmended approval subject to the follaaing five (5) conditions: �' ' . ,�a �''r''� - the applicant will cortply with tt� air and water quality i�act mitigation techniques tP.��';ni j�,� suggested by the Environmental Health Department to control construction i[[gacts ' �� and will seed disturbed areas after construction to contsol long tezm fugitive � dust problems d-T r:` - the applicant will ca�q�ly with the recn,irements for obtaining a road cut pexmit .,-:,. s:r«'!': from the County Engineering Department `'s~�� - the appLicant will obtain permission from tk� BLM if it is found that eitl�z the ��:.>:.. ��;., water or the sewer syste�n extension requires a crossing of land owned by that agency �:.,.�:; - the applicant will adhere to the recom�ndations for soil stability included in the `''"' lettes fran Nick LartQiris to John Dorgm�s dated June 30, 1983. The Planning and ;�=�"' Zoning Comrtission will be given an opportunity to review the final a].ignment and a , construction methodology for the utility extensions to ensure that the iag�acts - �� of crossing the stream and steep slopes are mitigated `' -�;;�;;=?_. - Pitkin Co�mty should considex the possibility of providing a trail along the • shoulder of Castle Creek Road after it has been di.sturbed by this pmject Ck;,•`,?;'' . �;,, Richman noted that the County Manager requested that the Planning Office assist the a;;s�(;� applicant by expediting the review of the application to the degree possible. He �-:-`;,:� ;;,;:rt�; presented a resolution granting 1041 special review approval subject to the aUove y�`' five (5) conditions. � � � Environmental Health Directos Tom Dunlop explained that both the Citp and the �� Sanitation District agreed to fund the extensions pmviding the cartgus property 1 r..,:..:� �4="-s':.' ra�nains in MAA ownership; in the event the subject pmperty is sold, the purchaser , ? �,�$"? must remit to both the City and the Di.strict the off-site costs of the project. �.ti___. t:;S;;:'= Dunlop felt it was appropriate to expadite the review process; the health hazard ��z �; i�lications were of paramount concern, and the City has only recently solicited � bids on its watex system inprovements, which bids could include the proposed 4�'.: � ' extension to the cartpus upon County approval. � � Richc[an e�lained that the development potential associated with the extensions s'.'. 'i�,"i.; i2 .. '"' was not substantial; five (5) units was considered the potential for tapping into �. r� �' `` �'' the water/sewer lines, although this was considered vesy unlikely as each unit would �µf��' �:;r•1. F��. . �,.;-.�_s1� rerniire a pimp station at significant expe�se. '�a�? �'�' Madsen then opened the heazing for public carment. Diuilop explained that there 5zh.� 7^'^. '+'� are two (2) wells on the ca�us pazcel; one (1) i.s entirely non-functiona1 and •ti,.r7�ti� � .. ..,,,� �-K`!�*j the other, although modified with a disi.nfection and filter system, can only be �`�,;.;� s.�-}� used during the s�r months. The property also consists of five (5) leach fields, j'�'� and effluent has leaked into the water system as well as the Castle Creek River. -k�'^ ''�`'�� Jim Flood, an engineer representing the applicant, ooncurred with the findings of ,; ��;' . "�'"� the Envirorniental Health Department. 77be existing septic system are currently i;,_� ' �Y_,;.eYA . . •,ti�:� 9 T' !�`Mr �� '.ssioner's Meetinc� 8 August, 1983 - 2 �': - _ ' <:`: . , F:.;}�;^ • _ ?� '��' .zy�" ' 't A'.-.\�� }' �y�' %X . i'+ -� ' �,' � + a lt t7� �.y",� ^.k){ � .. . . f � . ' 's :". 'y. ► .. ' a r� ''a'fj� tF��°"�� , �f�`�c �r� re,� = y y Yl�F ��:r k k " v �`'�nr' i � l..t►"�.;}'{ ' es : �6��,Y w'`7 7�. e r��t�� „'�f`��ttc..s. �� h 1 F" �St� i(+ ��'�"��d ��H � , . •�+ 1.sr..Yk�.��,.� ...�._t,s.:.,:..!f+�c.+m»y.�s�:+,.��'�3 r.`�....��"......�..::,:c��.�.,..=i"...,�.�.e.�'.+�`� . .,y,6h..K-b.i�i Y ar?Fi s �a, � .�- . � .._..__. ..._._..... ... ..__ . _ .. .,Y. �+_.��.;. ; ?:,= ��, discharging approxim3tely two thousand (2,000) gallons of raw sewage into Castle - Creek on a dai.ly basis. ;�?�.? � Kinsley suggested that the engineers review the acquifer to determine the extent ' �~�'�:�`''� of sewage pollution in the river. Flood did not consider the amount of di.scharge to ..� r t� be substantial, and did not feel that such would pose any danger to downstream users, }'�` �'`. 4...'.. ��."'+ '`"'�' Klanderud noted that the Plannin and Zonin Comnission's re g � I 4 g quest for a tsail alon ,; �� ;l the shoulder of Castle Creek Road was inconsistent with the County's trails master �:;..:;,� ,.�;,;. '�.�_`;� plan; that plan provided for a trial along the river instead of the road. In the event y;.,._; ��.� �-� z?t�'�s) a trail was to be considered along the road, however, Klanderud suggested that such i?�,:':a`:' . ' (2�1�I._�.;� . �-`'`��:>'� should be acco�lished in canjunction with the canstruction of the service e.xtensions. y.-.�.- =Z�'•°;; �{:s;'.>.; ?e;;:�^� County Manager Curt Stewart agreed to obtain a cost estimate for the trail from the �`� ;;±;��"`i County Engineer. :J � � ' John Doremus, representi.ng the applicant, explained that the applicant vrould prefer i to com[ence the improvements this fall, even though the application i.ndicated that r„�. . �r ;� constructioa would be accarrglishec3 in 1984. The City and the Sanitation District have , � i � acgeed to prwide the funds this year, estimated at approximately five hundred thausand ' � `� t:�;��::;'� , . �ar.;,��:; dollars ($500,000), and the applicant would provide approximately two himdred and ..*t;;,,r,, � fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) for on-site i�rovements. The County Engineer was ;�i + concerned, however, that a fall construction schedule would not allow for the repaving � .� �� '� of Castle Creek lznad this ar, and su , n ye ggested that the applicant maintain the 1984 ,T::;;�;;'.� construction schedule as originaZly proposed. ':4a--',9 �`'�"�'m:y' Flood explained that � ,�� approximately four thousand (4,OOOy feet of Castle Creek Road � Y � j would be disturbed for the sewer li.ne extension. Construction would not begin Until � t. t , ``;7:;`'::j i. ,;•; mid-September at the earliest, and the project would not be co¢cQleted for one and { �,, "� one half (1'�) months. The repaving of the Road would not occur until November, then, � . �;:='�:` and there was concern that weather conditions would not allow for the satisfactory ? `. F;,c st pavi.ng of the facility. The applicant would prefer to patch and maintain the Road 3 , �x �j throughout the winter, and achieve the paving in the spring. The County Engineer was 3 �.-.:� ��:;j , ,°:;a concerned with the operability of the Road during the winter months, and requested ^ � that the project be deferred until spring. �� !�,�'-�� Dunlop did not support the deferral of the project as requested by the Engineer as ��i;�`�� t'x" the potential for a water-borne illness was felt to be significant. �' I " Stewart asked how the licant would mai.ntai.n the Road durin the wi.nter months. �_.,� aPP 9 �,.,, �;��z �_'-.+� Flood explained that the applicant would restore the disturHed areas with road base, k � {i �t `��?�� and periodically grade this road base throughout the winter. The MAA would be .�'�� responsible for grading the road base, which would likely rec��ire the use of a p�� ,u�.`�� maintainer once a week. Flood explained that the applicant could pmvide for a ��, �` �•�.�� ;:=..:.;.,.. t''.�'�. � B Aug�.�st. 1983 - 3 _ � _. _ .�, __ ._..�.:...,.,�» t -:t:�; ?� - n "t . 4nr�,,� �- � :> �f ,, .�i��7/iY�1�" � i-„t r.�..: .. ��..,�r �` �S �� r- ..+�� 7'J,y�'�3��c .. ,.,�A�7:'•.M.� ia:l�.wv.U.S.�tl��.4a+!firw�.�L...dL:::::.c�».`Jii._.r,�{�x"�ni... .-�ta�vk.�rv.<sk;�-�.au�h'E��4��.�_. _��..},.t w{.i:.S`,._�^M.. � ��' I � I te�orary asphalt patch over the distrubed area for the winter months only, with �'i a final repaving to be acconplished in the spring; thi.s method�uld, however, ,i; �;:.j require greater expense, and the applicant would prefer to restore and maintain the � �":;i � : >,.. road base instead. ;;� �i;:•. <.r• • �:�+ County Attorney Wes Light noted that the road base alternative supported by the ':� applicant would not cortgly with Covnty standards; consideration of this alternative �� ;- should be conditioned to an agreement, between the applicant and the Board, whereby � . ' �� the MAA would indenmify the County and address the maintenance of the road cut. I. ( ;y Madsen asked for additional comnents; there being none, the hearing was closed. f, sj Kinsley then moved appmval of the resolution and further, to allow for the ( c� � i� construction to occur this year subject to the following additional conditions: i � - the applicant will ensure that the water line aligcurent fr�n the watex plant to a� Castle Creek is revegetated to ensure that ground cwer i.s restored to the area �' - the applicant will enter into an agreement with the County wncerning the maintenance of Castle Creek Road during the winter of 1983-84 tmtil it can be finally repaved, - including an indenmification of the County for any damages arising there£rom r Blake seconded and the motion passed imanimously. � � Public The Board convened a public hearing to consider the Aspen Racquet Club, a speci.al Hearing: � Aspen review application. Planner Richard Grice submitted to the record the Planning Office ' Racquet � Club rtiena of 8 August, 1983, the application, and the Land Use Code as amended to date. '� i': The applicant has requested approval for the redevelopment of the clubhouse and related �' • facilities, to include the following; the r�aval of the bubble structure and existing � clubhouse, to be replaced with a new, expanded clubhouse with indoor tennis courts �� and a solaritan. Previous approvals allow for a total of twenty-nine thousand, eight �•': ��. i��:� . � hundred and forty-two (28,842) square feet; the applicant has also requested, in acldition ��' re ::.. to the redevelopment of the facility, a Cam�rcial Q� exe�tion for nine hundred and �,u eighty (980) additional square feet to allow for a larger solar gallery entry way. The jF ; ^�••�. applicant proposes a total, then, of thirty thousand, eight hundred and twenty-two }�-' (30,822) square feet as follows: c� - thirteen thousand, six hundred and twenty-two (13,622) square feet for the expanded clubhouse " - fifteen thousand, eight hundred (15,800) square feet for the indoor tennis courts - one thousand, four hundred (1,400) square feet for the solar gallexy „ Grice displayed a map and a color rendering of the proposed redeveloped facility, which included a new landscaping plan. The Planning Office supported the application as such . was felt to be more consistent with County policies, particularly scenic quality. The � Office also supported the new landscaping plan as such would provide for a larger lake and land fosms, and the realigrn�ent of the County's bike path. Steve Conger, representing the applicant, discussed the new landscaping plan. The plan provides for mature trees and berms approximately fifteen (15) feet in Canni.ssi.aner's Meeting 8 August� 1983 - 4 4:r�"«T",`.'2 i . �:'•� :� �� .a __ .,,.,..�...w.�.,,.� . "'s. ;:y�„ . - ':a:;.; ��?k y � �C� ; r ,� 4xHj r : . .. r � ! � s 'U. , e . ...:. t�^{s t'`��F. k' i'g'�v r� ��s � �. , r ��.t�t J�_�'?�� r �` �1 ��x � [ r?„ 1' r -"l:. i �a•wani�'t'r�17��1�-:ii'si�'x`U��.t4�atk7l�ra�r1!w,�vn."s;wM�� ,i:.>.....�....�.•1 +.a��3. dx IR.,�..i.`,w�:��t��_��..�.d.....,.� ' height, the coutours of which would provide for tkle ca�lete screening of the Racquet �:,,, !r',''. Club project from Highway 82. The clubhouse facility itself would be ninety percent `�=.� ''`' (90�) passively solar; although the building would contain a substantial �riount of , i�':':. i glass, such would be placed at a forty-five de�ee (45°) angle so as to preclude '� � glaring. The redeveloped facility would be situated from twelve (12) to fifteen (15) �._„ : � � � '=� feet below grade, and would ccxig�ly with the County's twenty-eight (28) foot height 1 :,�,..,:,? - �<;`;:�; `'" limitation. It was anticipated that construction would cortmence in the spring of �'`�;'''.; }i�iis �::-.. 1984, and that landscaping would be accanplished during the sium�r of that year. The ��?,,.:: �«_;;:=.. •k,::�:='•� applicant would likely require a te�orary Certificate of occupancy pending the :s,_a.-: �..;;�;;:,.� t`r�;:r:= coi[Qletion of the landscaping; it was suggested that the Board condition the issuance �Y::`1 �"�'''�� of a tengx>rary Certificate of Occupancy to a grading plan for the landscaping, and „"-�",-:: �s_.;=.:�f . .�,�.,;-� � . '�",,� that the applicant be required to acco�lish the landscaping prior to the issuance - of a permanent Certificate of Occupancy. - _ �'�, ` r�.;�?*'. Grice explained that the application included a rnmiber of accessozy uses, such as �� a pool, jacuzzi, clubroom, lotmges, locker rooms, a pro shop, an e�cercise roan, and �;=;<::; '•"` ' a food service. All such uses would be limited to club mPnibers onl and would not �;,.;`�� Y. i�.`:i'`� �;�; be available to the general public. The applicant also requested a parking reduction, L:;'`j:< ;::�'ti on the basis that overflow parlcing would be available on the clubhouse drive entry '. t:x.:_ 4 � road, by lease on an adjacent property, or in the Buttezmi.lk parking lot. Finally, "�� ' the applicant has requested a subdivision exe�tion to allow for a lot ]ine adjustment � " xr.., in confoxmity with the new facilities proposed. �,i_ The application was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Cortnussion at theis rern,lar �.. � �., meeting on 5 July; the Conmission granted the parking reduction and recoimiended � F;';;' �<.;. , special review approval subject to the follawing two (2) conditions: � \ - the larxlscaping plan shall be fully ii[Qlemented prior to the issuance of a � � . "Certificate of Occupancy" �„ � - parking shall be prohibited within puhlic easements and right-of-ways � �._,.; � u�_ The Planning Office reconmended the following three (3) additional conditions: z:,�>`= r . � f �1 - the applicant shall dedicate a water line easement along the access road between a �� " Stage Road and the eastern property line adequate to achieve looped water service ��':�'� '�� `�� in the area C.+i�� .�.� - all accessory facilities including pool, jacuzzi, club room/food service, lounges, , . �? locker roans, pro stmp and exercise room shall be for tk� exclusive use of club '�� rtienbers and will not be available to the general public , - the subdivision exe�tion plat shall be approved by the County Engineer prior to ;'�;. recordation � Madsen then opened the hearing for public �nt. Herb Klein, representing the applicant, explained that the applicant recently submitted a Q� application for .x� two (2) additional i.ndoor tennis oourts. Tennis clubs generally provide one (1) � indoor court for evexy one hundred and twenty-five (125) members, and there are ' four hundred and seventy-five (475) metrbers at this time. The applicant would like �� e to provide four (4) indoor tenni.s courts in lieu of the two (2) identified in the '� t,' Cocmiissianer's N!eeting 8 .AUgust, 1983 - 5 f"�;:.,.,, , �� `;.� _ __. __._._ � ':, . ';,.;: ' . _ �k � . �� .fl�.�' �t ..s ..�} A r � �r ��.��r � �v.��;.� �,}'� ,�. � �y'r�c.,v�f..._ ..� � a .y�X".i�'-r��3'r-w�f�'�C:_k w� �;�, i� xc k y�.d� iy� ;: j � ,t; t wk � t�.Ti'�° '" .•i��i�" '�tJ fn � 4� .i S'� •� �� , e �r. � .'3 d; i x:.Yfr r� � f �'r :� ,��`r�l^a 4' � ..-e..v�c�w„ ..-,..�a�i.,.�•. .I„wi.�ro-k�...�::��..;°,,.:..,..a.....�. "'�..�:as."hv...-.`.! 3.. . .�;5 �:t:.:��}.�(wi1:.,.._�t^', .r.:-s.;. i � �:" : ! application. Klein was concerned that the two (2) additional indoor cowtts would ,;; ';�;'_ � necessitate a Q� application, a procedure not conside.red appropriate for this ,.�;�,.. � i I particulaz use. It was not knawn, for instance, haw such a tennis court could �r .:� g �. co�ete with other comrercial uses particularly with respect to inQacts. Klein ' �•' t rerniacted that the Board convene a study session on the applicability o£ tennis ; _ ��r ' courts within the C� procedure; specifically, the applicant would request that the � >;:�s;'. ��w;�� tvro (2) additional indoor courts be exe�ted from growth management. �"'`�' Klanderud su ested that it would have been ro riate for the entire c,�;....., g9 ��;•, epp p application .�, ... :�.°_�;. '^`�"r to be reviewed in the context of growth managelnent; the tennis club has been reviewed {-:,:�� Yt."�.�{ � . �r�+�� and anended on nwnProus occasions durin the t four 4 t.r�•,;:,: 4 P� � ) Years, and the various :iFr.��:.j 4r„r.; past approva2s do not confonn to the most recent proposal submitted by the applicant. ;�'.';5;`,:i �_.;;.,., Klein did not feel that tennis facilities were within the intent of the Q�, rather, �i±,. such facilities were more appmpriately considered special review uses. Klein noted that the Q� review process was much longer than the special review process, and the ' iF:.�.: ^`,i':+ applicant would prefer to construet all four (4) indooz tennis courts s9multaneously. ;�"'�:;i;j . ;�;�_°� Klandezud noted that the application naw before the Board represented a change from a= ;� - t '� a tennis club to a full health service facility, a use which was considered to be . 9�J ,,r,,i..,,,� within the intent of �rcial growth. ' Madsen then submitted to the record a letter trom E.J. Obexmeyer, the owner of ��' �_ ,.� y � ': a parcel oE land situated adjacent to the Racquet Club parcel, Obermeyer was �r'_.: �'''+ concerned that additional traffic on Stage Road would result in both noise and dust .�^�", llution, and re ested that the Road'be ` ;,�y;_• Po qu paved as a condition of approval. IClein 4z'Si_ � explai.ned that the applicant eliminated its Highway 82 access and relocated such to ±I i.: . � �i Stage Road at the request o� the Board and at considerable expense to the applicant. r �:�' � Klein understood that, as the road was relocated at the applicant, ;; .�". �w;;,;;`�;;': expense of the ,� � the applicant would not be responsible for its paving. ' � y {r ,� C1ut Stewart noted that the original Racquet Club application included a shuttle � t�' � vehicle program. Klein understood that the shuttle progam was proposed in conjunction �r '`'._`� - +:�'° with an earlier application and that its use would be iimited to e�Qloyees of the ��,� �� Club. Kinsley requested that Grice review the previous submissions and include c� �°�, a wndition on the shuttle program consistent with previous representations. �K=rx; �� M�:?J Madsen expressed sane concern that the new clubhouse £acility may i�act Stage �a Noad, and adjacent property ovmers, and suggested that perhaps the road should be ��:� �� ,f,;;* paved. Applicant Tom SomPSS explained that he wnuid encourage non-resident a�nbership ��i'X� #; y, ype of constituency would not significantly �'V for the new facilit and that this t �_,`.� �'iyiy �,� i�act the roads/neighborhood. He also noted that the Zoline Cd�1P application would �;'A '�;� provide for the paving of Stage RQad in the event the application was approved. fr4= �� .{?'!a?I . ��I�: ``"� Cartnissioner's Meeting 8 August, 1983 - 6 i'�Y~� '.:I i _. . _ ` ��z� �b p� t - .F � . � N - � .. S ,iYM��,�,_: .. :, �,M4z�„ �`F �C x T�fi d t(({' .i. f,t.^ re q.��.4#rYe -.� ��jx'�•; y fz" y �`� ��l 3��' -1 ' '!��E�S4 ..�j � t '..f'l}` -Q � a1e+'t�.i�� 'Y � f A .ta!'ici'.1.�'r,TstF"•i�;+�.�('d �.fi� � � E� 3 .�..�:+..�:+L.:J � �':.�.wct.:�.::iJmr � ��P.�,��.e_._.� .s .. . _f::aon^w'flr�4leu:+:rr:�.u:�r.ri.:id+snt. b�M.' ...'. . i ��_��•:.i � � �:;,'. � The Board generally agreed that, as the applicant was requised to relocate its ' ` � Highway 82 access, the applicant would not be responsible for the paving of Stage Road. . z' i j:��-��. i '-� . Kinsley questioned the ability of the Board to i�ose a condition limiting the use • . �'��`;c' g, _ ��" � of all accessory facilities to members of the club only. Grice explained that the d`..•'�` iti r..'� ,M. limitations were proposed by the applicant, particularly with z�ec.t to the food z ��%~� `-: service; food service/restaurant uses are not special review uses, and can only be �M:;;�=-- ��°"�':- approved as accessory to the principal use. The food service must, in this instance, g�;` `�Y"•- be considered accesso to the Club facilit which would lunit its use to club ?��i�,� i'3' Y, �:-~�� ?`;•:��:•i members. M1�.r� t�.��,- t��.''� Madsen asked for additional comrents; there being none, the hearing was closed. :;�.,��;';; . k=:^r�� . . �'`�'� Blake then moved approval of the application subject to the five (5) conditions of ..,.;;::,. ':�,._,.� _ �-�,'� the Planning Office as amended belaw: a �� - the landscaping plan shall be fully i�lemented prior to the issuance of a final '�" "Certificate of Occupany". The grading plan must be fully i�lemented consistent ?<�i'�`I with the submission prior to the issuance of a teng�orary "Certi.ficate of Occupancy" i -� i and subject to the follaving additional condition: {�':,:,,a - the applicant's previous coi[mitments with respect to transit service will become a "�',:;.j condition of this approval U:5'��'1 ^,:-.;:.�4� . . °i-''�`"' Kinsley seconded and the motion passed unaniurously. `c',':,�::� ...;-..::.1 , <:.� ---------- _ r:: - ri ;*;';.1p�lic The Board convened a public hearing to consider the expansion of the Sundeck .r,�:;_•;jHearing: ��;�Sundeck Restaurant, a special review application. Richard Grice submitted to the record : .� � < ._{ the Planning Office memo of 8 August, 1983, the application, and the Land Use Code 3 �.�,:a ; ��''�'`'' as amended to date. The application, submitted by Peter Birfelder for the Aspen r;:'._-� , •:;_�_..; Skiing Cot�any, requests a one thousand (1,000) square foot expansion of the ��7� Restaurant by enclosing the existing deck. The request was submitted within the r � y context of the C�rcial (3� exertg�tion procedure, which al].�vs for expansions of �' �; 3 existing comr�ercial uses up to one thousand (1,000) square feet pmviding the i�acts i t �are mini�qal/manageable. Subsequent to the deck's enclosure, the applicant intends to =�;:'- y-,• `�:t,f �1 construct a new deck structure at a size of one thousancl, two hundred (1,200) square : ��;>�•�.,1 �';"1 feet. �� Referral com�nts were generally supportive; the application does not propose :�:ir �:�;� expansion of production facilities such as kitchen space, rather, the enclosure of ��c'4, outdoor deck space historically served as seating space. As the restaurant has greater Fe?� � production than seating capacity at this time, the expansion would not generate .;{ �;�' a need for additional service facilities or �loyees. The application was reviewed �y.k:�. by the Planning and Zoning Comaission at their rern,lar meeting on 5 July, who :�� "`� recortmended approval without condition. = F'�"``i �i ��-L. Ccecmissioner's Meeting -:::: 8 August, 19F33 - 7 i° - i �.__.. ---�-----_.,_ ;,•`' �i;'; ;�! _ ,n i n �C� ^ 1y' � ry ,�s"ir�Ly,t . £�� y ....�ssfi�= � t . ,,}1 s.` J� n(C` lx �s.��,ki a• � ?.M'�j�,1� ) „a . ;: y tiy��'y�l�qx�'rFr�.L J.�� `� <R��c'� tF SS�7 t "k� Yji .�~ r� �r�4y� 'k"v. b 'i�� x'�e��a �� . r`� .�r 6� it�'f F� �" r { �,Ett °.,. f� -`� 4 � �`711r e ♦.: � � !�y' �{� i ._�; +. ..��r§ K�� ev'�''' �1'•j;-�S4 E� �� a;�,,.•�h T f ,.�� ... --�'�c�"-`. . ...- . �-- . .. , . .� •uu.r.�.:�'.°.', L�.�:.re.wY.s.,�.��;:?ki..fm'�.�.�'�?1_...xh:t3�...,. .z,:.. _ - .J t I . C, � . su'-° 4 Klanderud expressed some concern with the referral by the Housing Office, which 1 indicated that the expansion would generate the need £or no more than one (1) i.�-. - �: },,:.: i additional gnployee and possibly none. The Office, when reviewing the Ruthie's f �r y Restaurant application, established a specific fozmula £or calculating the ntmiber of 8 ' � r �loyees ge�ated by a restaurant facility, which included seating azea capacity ° j rp aif . ": �-i`.:.•,::-. ; ��:;;.; and others. The use of this fonrnila was apparently not unifoxm given the Housing F�;,.; f='�;�� n=^�/r`. Office referral on the Sundeck expansion. Grice noted that the Sundeck application �1':, ?hYT'';;.".: .�;.,:� was not representative of an entirely new restaurant facility, as was Ruthie's, and i;a��,`- �?;�'%: furthes, the 5undeck application did not propose the expansion of kitchen £acilities. °.:�:i:=� : F��-f;`_V`; ��.r. 7fiese variables should account for the di.fferent review of the tvro (2} applications. �� ;:' Madsen then opened the hearing for public camient. Wayne Slanke, a contractor � �� representing the applicant, stated that the expansion was necessary and beneficial �w�. to the conmunity. t':,:y:l •� Madsen asked for additional comnents; there being none, the hearing was closed. E� Klanderud moved approval of the application without condition, Blake seconded and 'r:.�:>:. the motion passed unanimously. �'��. ;"�:: ---------- y ✓. ' '-;PUblic The Board convened a public hearing to consider on second reading an ordi.nance Hearing: Senior authorizinq the corrveyance of certain real property constituting part of the .:;Housing k,:;;<_,�Convey comrnuiity center to Care Center Cotm�ittee for the piupose of development of senior b=";=' '��;;;j housing_ County Attorney Wes Light introduced the ordinance which, upon its adoption, .°'�__.r._i �;;. +y�`'a would provide for the donation of an identified portion of the camu�nity center site � tf.�°?.'= ., tc. ? � to the Care Center Coi[mittee for the proposed Silver Willows senior housing project. '�:. � Fr � 3 ._ Y '� Light noted that there were various policy issues associated with the donation, v ��„ '� which issues should be addressed prior to the conveyance. � ,,, � ` 4 �., � r Hunan Ser.vices Director Marie Mactavish explained that the policy issue of greatest fi �.-] � _ �� '� concern involved the anticipated relationship between the ca[munity center and the '� � :�:.r. ,�;' �= proposed senior housing project; the location of the senior housing project on the �M„;}: �� co9mninity center grounds was supported by the applicant in lazge part due to the ;�x ��' various senior programs naw offered at the centex. The senior project shou].d, hawever, 8 be reviewed in the context of the long texm use of the comminity cent�, and the � applicant should address the anticipated use of the facility including the food Ai service program, use of the patio space, program staff and facilities, and others, `F« Mactavish was supportive of the ordinance as such would assist the applicant in - obtaining financing for tl� project; it was considered irtperative, however, that the County remain involved in all phases of planning for the project, and that all issues be addressed in conjunction with the development of the Project. Mactavish understood r F'+: �`��:1 �, ��°r:;. � . F+�::i, � ' _ ,1.� '' �i� ". � � 4Y��"i y+'�t (�i.. 'h }. ,�,'�'�, ��r.�tii f}Gx ?i. . f ' �' �? /��J 1 q� r ..' S �� .� . 1 '� •��x�4'yP?^'f q4Y .�.�je+} !i . .J' •��t � f � 4�[��tw --�, ��: +'� �,5*`` � � ,. ....:.`r.'-:�,#r...�4r,r>...�:y�r:.��Hri.�6-,.�4 ct:.'...."�!��:..i.�'"..�.� .'.T.:,��{�d..� r�-r.�w�._ ,�:i 3�_. � �� tf'� �t r >,� ��:�. �-�:�_'�.... , ,..�, ,i � i : , t � that the project has been relocated cZoser to the camnmity center building, a siti.ng i � - � change based in part on the asswned use of the connnmity center itself; although the i ?°^,�,,j building plans have been redesigned as noted above, such plans have yet to be submitted �r '. � • � ,{ to Mactavish for review. �;^-.`v`" . .� Jim Curtis, representing the Care Center Camtiittee, explained that the applicant t--r � .:`. ��, „`° would proceed with a revised building plan if said plan would accomodate adjacent a ; �?r�;=<- property owner Bob Oden. Subsequent to Oden's approvaZ, the application would be i��,;- �_: �;*-'- resubmitted for �A� � general submission review once again. Curtis requested the ability to •r_. ? -�: provide for minor changes in the building footprint, to allow for either an increase ..r,k�; or decrease of up to five thousand (5,000) square £eet. He noted that a resubmi.ssion �rr'�" '�'�:'� would provide an opportunity for all referrals/staff to review the project again. _€t:�' �?:;-'� ;�';;`::`;:` Madsen then opened the hearing for public carment, C.lirtis explained that the ordinance would only provide the applicant with an option to pursue the pmject. The ». �'� �L applicant wuuld not receive title to the suUject property until ca�liance with the r � �a subdivision and building pexmit procedures has been deironstrated. Ctiartis supported f;,_,=:5.._.; •`•��•;'='; passage of the ordinance as the applicant must denanstrate the Board's intent tv � � ' provide for the property prior to securing financing for the project. �-�<<• � � t ,�f;� Nick McGrath, representing the Qden's, agreed that the proposed senior project should :a be reviewed in conjw�ction with other uses at the comrn�nity center on a long term - _w basis. Although the Oden's were concerned that the housing project represented a �:'�k�''"''" tairl intensive use, they ware equally concerned with other, future uses at the ,S <;I y '� � c�omminity center and their degree of intensity. It was difficult for the Oden's to , �''"r review the senior project in the absence of the County's plans for the cacRw�ity � `� . ; �.,: ''''=� center, and MeGrath re ested that the lon texm use af the facilit be made ]rnown. ;_=�W;::t;i � 4 Y � He noted that the Planning and Zoning Comnission recamiended denial of the application, ,r-.:. �t and that the Board, instead of follaving this recocmiendation, has cortmitted to �.. - � � ' ' providing land for the project prior to a thorough evaluation of the future use o£ }. :f�< k;.: the �ity center parcel. McGrath suggested, as a method to address these issues, t '.t � ;•.' �� ; that the applicant enter into an agreement with the Board whereUy the $oard would �.t.,,,' �:�'_: �;h�'�$; be ed to review/ ;�,;, s�g�ower approve the use of the units, including the rnar�ier of rental N*.<�,� �+�ti„"�� and for sale units, income `;:;, guidelines, and others. The Board can mandate fhis ,1,�� "`�� authority in conjunction with a conveyance, whereas the land use process itself does ;�`� not pmvide for such. McGrath opposed the passage of the ordinance on behalf of the Y� } �..;� �3�;;'-:� Oden's iven the densit of the develo � g y pment, the division of the comrnu�ity center E::, ,-;;,;�. �`.•y;.: y�y,��'«.,j property into two (2) parcels, and as the future use of both parcels was not ]mown. "?..,;�j?;•.;1 �'' Light explained that the ordi.nance was drafted only to provide authorization for .��. . ,v&�;;;: �t__,._ the conveyance, and that such would be conditioned to a contract between the Board �'_ti:: .�'-ic;�•. ` yr:; y v... � �r�t�+1'`F T'y.''M?"' . �Y:lYsywu Camnissioner's lKeeting 8 August� 1983 - 9 {�.,�� } �..,�_.__ �___ � ., ',, .:J1iy.� :� . _ ) .�'.r 1� i'` 'n 3�%S-.[�k �: u � � ' 1 .�. �� i�. �.]4 . i .. . i:, �."F �`t��1h� f'�"Mei�. at�-. � { �: w' F t i. ffi ;i< {�� . .'4'��' ry r � . : f ?r, f�t 'lt .�i � � ( ++.'-�.��L�J29�.'�� k��,� . �w .xn.lY�f#wk7��"L��r�t�CL�n:sYlf�Mz!4i'�inw!l.fwr.r.�d 4w�4'w]3`'�vre:...��"� w.e. ` s..,�a�S�,..�,r�.---�a,..ti,_ .. �� ' i and the applicant. He suggested that the following additional condition be identified fF .:_. i within the ordinance: � � - the Co�ty shall identify and place within the contract for conveyance such ' ? additional reasonable conditions relative to the use of the property which it ' "' � de�ns necessary in its sole discsetion �r t � ''� McGrath suggested that the Board direct the staff to draft a master plan for the x „ \-� ?� entire camm�nity center parcel, such so that all plans for the pro p ert y would be � , cs a� g::�w-� reflected, conceptuall y, b y detailed submission. ;�;y; ;,1 �-r ; Curt Stewart e�lained that staff has initiated a cortq�rehensive plan for the 1�=�`. 4i`�:�`��` property, which plan has been scheduled for Board review on Monda 29 Au �,s-"'': Y, 9ust. The ;y r plan was initiated in conjunction with the HLUnan Services Plan, and would identify tk Y:� those uses considered appropriate for the site. � . �,:;..": �``�_'` Marcia Cawee, the owner of propexty situated behi.nd the cam�unity center property, i��'i'r =�•�•;` ca[Qlimented the Board on the time devoted to the review of the senior housing 7�`�'� �. ;� project. Cowee was concerned, however, that the site maintain sufficient open space �', ,,� : ;''"-.`_y and park space, and she questioned whether zoning would allow for the project. � ! ` ,; Light explained that the Board recently adopted a "Public" zone district, although i,.:�,a� �; -;; the sub ect m ert has not et 9 P P�'tY �_;_::,� 7 p p y y been rezoned. The rezonin of the ro would occur �� in conjimction with the land use review process, and must be addressed at the detailed � 'Y��u� '" `_� submission stage iP found to be consistent with the master plan. Light e�lained that ;K 4, �) * a rezoning could only be acc�rg�lished pursuant to the notice req��irements of the � ;i Code and a public t�aring before the Board. u�_ 1 - Budge Bingham requested that he be included in the planning for the senior hovsing ��fi:� r='�+� project; Bingman has been involved in senior activities for the past several years, �f�t.:' _. �c':" '_%.. most of which occur at the canrn�nity center, and it was felt that he could assist in -� L5 .. 1"� - pZanning for the facility. ,�.;;: it�. _ ; � ^ Ra�rnna Markalunas,representing the Care Center Cortmittee, explained that the � � �� applicant met with the Himian Service Council this past week to discuss the project. � ! � f The applicant has evety intention of soliciting their participation in the development r� r�-. �'�Y of the project. ��'%:; Cra�': ��x;i Ctu-tis agreed that the long texm use of the c�otm�unity center property should be r?;,��, ��- addressed although such was considered the responsibility of the County. The ��j;rt applicant would be vexy willing to cooperate with the Board in reviewing appropri.ate �5 �'��` uses for the sub'ect � parcel. G�rtis did note that the applicant has ca�mitted to � another general submission application, at which time all irtg�acts and issues of �� = croncern vrould be addressed. The applicant continues to solicit input from all adjacent ��. ..�:� property owners in an effort to mitigate the project's irtpacts. `.�_ '� Joan Lane expressed sane concern that there may not be sufficient denand for the � ..� :� (:p,s,; Conmissioner's Meeting 8 August, 1983 - 10 �:f::;_ -:tc:.,� _ :� , :,,�.:...i=: � . � '�� ,, �/..� , r� . - r _,� � �t` r t + t �' .r i�,+�� '��' 41�... � �. y f =; h �p5. ; h s��'�'��'x�'�,n��y�f+�A�.�dtsg v�, tit �� u'�<�+'�• 1`i .._ x >Sr� � �x �si° trf K �, ,7t 4.�i� ��r�'�aF.q �. lJ�,��r'.tl��li.. 4� /T}ny� t 'Y �I''Y : �`t�_ �, ♦ l��`i a��Sr - }�r+ ,�., iaE y.y ary Pw+ '�f °ji K 1 f� '�0 1 c�+ . p"'�"�'��s,a�h � ��`' `':+'msc�ht't*� :� 4� �:�� "�y� � �'��sTti�� .._�� .,�_.._ .Nltr{a� 1�S?f� r � � ,c {.. ...� ,w�.�„'ksi::_ . . i.�:i�a ._t...�,.. ..� . .? r�..,... _ ...� .,.�......Fn . i_� !,+.� senior imits; the units would be restricted to price/occupancy guidelines, and '�'� there was some cancern as to the use of the units in the event these was insufficient � ,a� dem�nd. Senior Coordinator Jamie Hall felt that there was suEficient demand to warrant ' <1 ;�) the project; although there are six i6) vacant senior residenti.al units at the � j� crnnrnuiity center at this time, several senior citizens have deferred m�ving into the � � f � center in antici tion of the new ro'ect. Kinsle su t ' Pa p 7 y ggested that it may be appropriate i� � - "� to dee$ restrict the units to senior citizens based upon specific age criteria, in �� which case the units would ranain vacant in the absence of demand. � ,'� i.. �� Phoebe Ryerson was supportive o£ the ordinance and felt that Yhe comm�nity was vexy �� supportive of the Silver Willows pmject, r!� Virginia Morstein-Marx supported the senior housing project but expressed some �� "� concern with the senior kmusing guidelines; Morstein-Marx was interested in residing �; '' t;y in the facility although current guidelines would preclude such. � :3 �i Jane Jenkins felt there was sufficient demand for the project although there was smne i� �� concern that the senior housing guidelines may preclude occupancy by many senior i� citizens. Jenkins requested that the Board address this issue. l s� Mona Frost was s�portive of the pmject and requested approval. � �� Madsen asked for additional comnents; there being none, the hearing was closed. �� Kinsle then m�ved a ` y pproval of the ordinance on second and final reading subject to e` the following amenc�cnent; k. - that the conveyance of land to the Care Center Cot�mittee, constituting approximately ' thirty-eight thousand, eight hundred (38,800) square feet, shall be "substantially° �'; � �: as shown on the site plan dated 5 November, 1982 :' � � � and subject further to the following additional condition: � - ' � ;�� - the County shall identify and place within the contract for conveyance such �;� additionat reasonable conditions relative to the use of the pmperty which it deems � ,.; necessary in its sole discretion �'� �`:..:.- K7 � `F�� Blake sewnded and the motion passed with opposition from Klanderud. �:� r'- r`' -------- .�. �PUblic Blake noted that the U.S. Forest Service has drafted a thirty (30) year plan ��,°"' �� ix Comre.nt �M � � �w on the future use of Forest ServiCe lands, including recreational, timber and mining uses, access, the eacpansion of existing facilities such as ski areas, the wnstsuction � of new facilities, and others. Blake suggested that it may be appropriate to � establish a comnittee, to consist of interested citizens and Board rt��ers, to review • " the docw�nt. Cutt Stewart explained that Envirorunental Coordinator Mark FUller �� has received the thirty (30) year plan, and would report to the Board in the near �� future. � Madsen submitted a request from Pitki.n County Fair Board m�r Bunny Wiley ��''�� E, t`�' ' t 19 3 - 11 .. ;.�:•' . , ` �`�` l2� - - 3s-- � � � . •- � �c.....t' , '� . � � :�`t r�4��"r�� : '�{� � ,,� y+,�1� } >f�-� . , i,, ��k��(3J, r7 's r 4 �}Y 't ^y . :.'� `. j� S 1� / . . g �-% ��s9�ir^"'�"S�"t �`��i�'t ` �r 4 _� '�'r�r ' � *aih�S � � !�t'�,{.'�.y"�... � . a F . qarx� t "y �:�$-�, r . r♦ t h-nr t x . ._�. 2,,..��k�:4�9t'lo.Kr.�.,:,...��tv:�a.�..,...cr.'��.+:as�_..e-... ';:�iX• .�"..:.�::_�-'1� 'i�` '.� .� ��.� ., a.:_.. �r�.�.� f...�': K._!iy .L..0.. _ � that this week be desigriated the Pitkin County Fais Week. The Board generally agreed '''- to designate the week of 8 throu h 14 Au 9 gust as Pitkin County Fais Week. 'n �::I ---------- � -� ;� �Minutes The minutes of 26 July, 1983, were reviewed and approved as submitted. ` �:� ':� +: ;w ;,�:t.,, �ZND Budget Analyst Lynn Dunlop introduced on secrond and final readin a s �' ' � �'+�',,, Read: 9 uPPlsnental ,-c.;,;.;•:�:, iv�i",;.:::',Supp budget appropriation resolution, which i�cluded the following: unanticipated �i:;<'- :APPraA "`"�'''`�' expenditures of four thousand, five hundred and thirt three dollars ($4,533) t t y_ �� , : representing the County's contribution to the MAA, thirty-three thousand, two hundred !."T_..,:r� t'�>�.��;;): >�;,:;;;; and one dollars ($33,201) for expanded transit services, four thousand, five himdred ��:�:. ;�.;;,;;'` dollars ($4,500) for a new mini-co[�uter purchased for aiuport operations, additional �a, � � } { available revenues of one hundred and fourteen thousand, eight hundred and eighty- y ! three dollars ($114,883) representing interest income, and others. ,�'`` .�� i � Kinsley moved approval of the resolution on second and final reading, Blake �z, '`J seconded and the m�tion passed unanimously. , ' `j ---------- � + � � ,IBr�"T�' (.lirt Stewart introduced an agreement between the Board and Bruce Brewer granting 1,,. >,,;�License ', j:P;;;;y`{A4ree Brewer the right to locate a domestic well on a portion of abandoned road right- i:;-j: � of-way in the Redstone Ranch Acres Subd.ivision. Stewart explai,ned that Brewer recently p� contacted the County Engineer to withdraw the agreement; Brewer has provided for ��' i the well in sotre other location, such so that the right-of-way was no ].onger needed. ' No action was taken. ;j ��'.:"�� ---------- �� . ;}'. � � .. I '!Bus County Engineer Pat Dobie introduced a resolution awarding the constrvction a �� IBarn � . Airport contract for the entrance to Sardy Field and the Aspen/Pitkin Coimty Bus Maintenance � ': 'Access �. t Agree Facility to Glassier-Terliamis, Inc. Bids for the auport/bus barn entrance were ° � solicited at the end of July, and two (2) such bids were received; one (1) fraan Elam L ;�_..•.. `�4'C:. � ' Construction for ninet six thousand, fort dollars and sevent five cents �' • �'- Y Y- ($96,040.75) � . ;�-.:;'r, �' ; and the other from Glassier-Terliamis for ninety-two thousand, three himdred and � ?-: -.�`w�'r fifty-nine dollars and si.xty cents ($92,359.60). Dobie recomnended that the Board :«., '�'".i award the construction contract to Glassier, the appazent laa bidder for the project, �'�� ?�+� and waive several technicalcrn-arnf�mnir;r.� within their bid; specifically, the Non- ��?. ' ;;; Collusion Certificate, Controller's General Eligibility Certificate, and the MBE and �M �'i F�inale Participation Fonns, were not included. All such forms were subsequently '?'^,.-:t�: �� f;, conpleted and submitted within twenty-four (24) hours of the bid opening, and '�' satisfactozy canpliance has been de�ronstrated. tci: .�:� %t Klanderud moved approval of the resolution and to waive the mroafimirdt�es noted ;�: �� `�� i>'.'�t,,:�1 Camiissiar�er's Meeting g Augu.gt, 1983 -12 �..�.i i- 5� �•.�'�".'� :`� �'�¢,<`r ' r� � 1 , .�7 1�a� �5��*c � "�Y� �-� ,yl - �i a 'u jt�.. . . � � � '1�•n y 1 r°r.'S " r�X � :r}�r�`+Fr�•• ?��' ��+ � � S'Y�uy��1�' h . , '' s t.�,�.-X tr.� Z�'ua NG�1� ".=•tj4i,�cj'��°3�?r.2 h �� ty u A c h �+ q -_+-+fi.ti...:.,FO".M�r.+f.�'::�.L....aa�Yr....c�:.:t.�.t:.....t.:,.�..:a.� .T.�... .Ib..a_._�a.�� .,e.�� .,:d-n4�':Y�.,twf -,_�_.., �.H-.,... .�. +,. '_I I . � above. Blake seconded and the rtation passed unanimously. (Kinsley leaves) � ; r-., j ;t.:'.'� ---------- �^'-`.�'- �Public Richard Grice introduced a resolution antin s "'' ' Works � 4 P��1 review approval and Cort�rercial 4 ., ;r �Building Q� exe�tion to the Public Works Suilding. The resolution identified ten (10) � . � ��,,� conditions of approval as established during the previous meetin�, and Grice �,:,::�: : ;r-r::� ' recannended approval. � � i.nj.":�:; • �;.:;:;, Klanderud suggested that the resolution was somewhat ambiguous; although specia]. '3�,:._:�, t�:'w,_ �.>:. review agpmval would be granted to the Public Works Building, it was not ]mawn �`" 'M��'� whether such was liunited to this one 1 facilit onl or whether such included the :�:��r� ( ) Y Y. ih;,,� �a'�:?� , replacement facility for the Colorado Department of Highways. Pat Dobie explained that �"�ii� ��`5+:5 the Public Works Building application included both the CDOH facility and the County's ,.�`� �� future Public Works Department facility. Architectural drawings for such have been r-:�-. �r.:- l�;' drafted, and four (4) separate buildings have been proposed. _ . �` � �.�; Grice noted that the application proposed only one (1) structure for both the County "��' and CDOH facilities, and that the Planning and Zoning Comnission approved the � ��, application on this basis only. The Comnission was reluctant to appmve the application y,.. ;`;. as it was felt that the County and CDOH facilities represented two (2) uses on one 'j�,{;`� . j� (1) parcel; County staff were able to convi.nce the Coimiission, haaever, that both ,."y,l ' ;y{ facilities were representative of one (1) use on the basis that only one (1) building .E"' = would be provided. The resolution now before the Board grants special review approval Fr; to both facilities within one (1) structure. �,, .I°.. Dobie explained that plans for the facility have been amended to provide for ;} 4=�� separate buildings, a change which was considered both benefici.al and more visually � �' �: pleasing, He noted that these changes could be reviewd by the Comni.ssion once again. � +' Klanderud suggested that the Board table the resolution; the project has apparently �; been redesigned, and the revised plans have yet to be reviewed by the Board or the � �: Plannin and Zonin Cotmussion. As the resolution would limit approval to one 1 �' "'� i::.� g g � ) � nr:�. .''._ - structure for both agencies, and as this approval no longer resembles the project, �'`��'-� k�; - =' Klandezvd suggested that the Board de£er action pending further review. l'z �: Stewart suggested that it ma be { �.� y appropriate for the Board to meet with the architect; the eoard could review the drawings for the facility to provide for a ' � structure consistent with the application. Blake was supportive of the facility and m�ved to appmve the resolution. Madsen � seconded and the motion passed with opposition fran Klandexud. (Kinsley returns) � ---------- � �Aspen 6uilding Inspector Patsy Newbury introduced a request for a tenq�orary use pernut �Racquet Club submitted by the Aspen Racquet Club. The Club has planned a a complimentary dinner ��jT� ��IPexmit t;� �+�Crnmissioner's Meet�g B August, 1963 - 13 :�,. ; ... -.�.-a i , - _ __.� �, � ._--__.� �..F';.;:s:K:, ;9� •, ,.w � �� t t x �Sk,�� :f � °v, f x � a"'„��l� r r,i�J;r�Y i�� r� :n yH.. �i t i �.x�:7� i :� ��r :.�'s7.� i1y j ri .� �, � �•�,��„<�p��,�y� �•a�4�$s ,r +�+, �'^� :,:4�rr(c t (, f,+t' 1 Lr. .:;h�-kLw.a:k�.��y�Y49ad,F..�L"6da�Y..tiin.Jh�s2.��?.�-�_L`.aatwwrec+��!a�:t(eif��' �i4�,�u]d �..:.��.�i 4"i�_i�.��.�.�t�,.:.i��.. ? and cocktail party for its me��ership on 1, 2 and 3 Septenber, 1983, to present , I � �i the future expansion plans for the clubhouse facility. The applicant has proposed S � a tent set-up for the event on one (1) of the tennis courts, a structure which . ;.. _ � requires a te�orazy use �**�;t and Board approval. p'` ,�._:•;. �'� �,.1 f. . i '� Referral comnents were generally supportive; the Building Department would inspect ¢� k �. � , the tent for fire safety pvrposes prior to the event, and, as requested by the �":� i��:i.:�:-;�: '�M'��:'.:-,. ; �;�-z•.�: Sheriff's Office, the applicant has agreed to provide valet par]cing in the Buttezmilk i ��.:ti'� (�r„-� - lot if needed. Newbury recomnended that the Board grant the tenq�orary use pennit �x `,:�,.;.; for the t2see (3) day e�ent as noted above. .. 3- .� . �� ?I --Kinsley moved approval, Blake seconded and the motion passed unanimously. ..;�;R.;;Y�_` �: : -?n�:;! c,� -� �__� '#:-�}�^;. "`�`'<''""Social Social Services Director Mike Schultz introduced di.scussion on a Meimrandwn of � 'r;5;:::�;;:; JS ServlceS Understanding between the Department of Social Services and the District Attorney's u ��;;� Office. The memorandinn provides for the District Attorney's services in qualifying r � individua]s under the Child Support Enforcement Act for a sivt (6) month period; the � � r >{ Boaz'd has entered into simi.lar agreanents during the past two (2) years, and Schultz 4.:,,_.•,. � ' - recomnended approval. � ' �r .j Kinsley moved to authorize the Chairnian to eacecute the agreelnent, Blake seconded r--��+,;,, ,r.'_�u?';. � �r;�'�;;�:r� �� °�,{:cj and the motion passed unanimously. ";? '; � fy Schultz then introduoed the Pitkin County Plan fo= Alternatives to out-of-home � Placement. The Plan provides tl� Department with alternatives to placing children �;""�i `�';'_i"�a in Residential Child Care Facilities, generally at significantly less cost. The � � �•� t ��;c'� budget for this program has decreased significantly this year, to a cost of thirteen t: �,., ,; �''-��''� thousand, three hundred and fifty dollars ($13,350). The Plan was identical to that �: � F,� . � � approved last year, although the specialized £oster care proqram has been deleted. �; '- � U � . �' Klanderud moved to approve the 1983-1484 Plan, Slake seconded and the motion passed " :.,:.;� �.`r � � � �j unaniccbusly. ? �_ T� :� Schultz then discussed a proposed program whereby the Sheriff's Office would assune, � :�.V � ��:`' after hours and on weekends, coverage of events otherai.se referred to Social Services "``� �'>`; }t=?` �`�� includin runawa g 1�$" g ys, child abuse ne ].ect, and others. This program wasinitiated in an Y�� '��°'%� effort to relieve the Social Senrices staff of tvro (Z) individuals from constant ;' coverage, and, as the Sheriff has the legal authority to intervene in snch matters, �hh.y+ ��Yt the transfer was proposed. Schultz was confident that the Sheriff's Office could provide this assistance, and it was anticipated that the Department would provide .?4 Yi� so¢ne training for the jwenile officers. He requested that the Board review the °.�:= �,k�, program prior to its submission to the wurts for final a�roval. � Finally, Schultz discussed the Colorado Task Ebrce on the Medically Indigent. The �, ,. �' :° `1 �,.u'�� Cannissioner's Meetinq 8 August, 1983 - 14 �,!'}'.�.�.-`�_;.J . . ._ • �. '�.k�i i ... .. v .��.W� �4 .�.{��,,.!4� .T . {-. 1 Y ..lh��L'�„1� �. � } .. _ '. I 1 S_i".uT�;�Tat�ilZ�h}�7e { ��:�1)l �.�t . • S .�' f �� ' ��+,#,�a�'. � y,� . y:? �..�, ''�,;..,. .n..`°�:rc°-�ai�L!'tilYt,w.°�...:w"��.�� ,.�1tG�_;<�..,w.:�A+-.'..�,{3„,�.:�.rk`.�t�s..�..::,..�.{...�a` rn�A�_��,.....�..�.-[.��.a,.xi�l�.:� .. �,. � Social Services Department in conjunction with the hospital and Comrnu�ity Health ;::; .`,.� Services, has cooperated with the Task Force in soliciting information on an indigent '?; I S`;-.i pro�am and its local ir�lementation. The Task Force has contacted various agencies •'�;'.' ,� � .''j throughout the state in an effort to address the needs of the rr�dically indigent and t y ��, j to devise a model program on the issue. Schultz agreed to update the Board on this �'• s,J_' pr°gram as it develops. __ .._ __... 4 '_.,„ ,, li:r'.:�•� _ ___ _ �.,.�'.� �_',.,:. -- - -- #': S..r,.:�; • . . ��':' Ensign/ Richard Grice introduced the Ensign/Mac3�lichael Vetezinary Clinic, a special review � �r-n . MdcMiChael ` �� Clinic application. Discussion was continued fran the previous meeting to allow for further . '�'``:`�-:1 anal is of the noise, wildlife, and hi hwa acts, and to review ad acent j^:�;,.,� YS 4 Y � 7 Pr�P�"tY i:r_'.r,;J . �'�r,zi:� owner Paul Hamwi's building envelope. Grice explained that tt� Planning Office has not �,�..:;: �`'-t��=": yet received referra]s on the above; neither the Department of Highways nor the Division ,�;;.� �':��`;;=�; of Wildli£e have caimented on the i�acts of the proposal. The Office did not intend to _ ��a' schedule the application for further discussion pending receipt of all referrals; the rw � ;i applicant requested, k�wever, that the item be scheduled for consideration today as the �;Y;';�=�"' applicant's purchase contract for the subject property was due to expire in the y ` ��++++P��ate future. �e,:� S , '. ' Grice explained that the Department of Enviro[mental Health has indicated that noise I..�;+.- ;� }""�` 1 i7c�pacts can be mitigated, and recmm�ended that the applicant utilize a technique c �.r� ,:� described as baffling spacers throughout the kennel facilities. The County Engineer has ,;;_ �r ;� indicated that deceleration/acceleration lanes would not be necessary; the single :r� p i� residence clinic would generate an average of twenty-seven (271 vehicles daily, vnlike >-°., =�"��k"��i the sixteen (16) unit Double X Quarter Circle Subdivision with an average of one hw�dred :��'�•'A. � k 5"'�s""y and twelve (112) vehicles daily. The applicant has indicated that both Hamai and adjacent ' T?.`-`•:fa" f property ownes Stutsman were amenable to the application provided "motel noise mitigation < ` `v'.� standards" were i�lemented. Finally, Grice noted that the building envelope on the Hamwi x � ;;� pmperty was situated greater than one hundred and forty (140) feet from the proposed +�,� c�' �� ,_„ ,, kennel; the Code contains a relatively si�le procedure i.n the event Hamwi desired to � Pr �,.. w � relocate the builcli.ng envelope at some future date. *� ��...-,:•. The Planning Office continues to recomnend approval subject to the six (6) conditions -_.,,,,., •E.v�m�.'R-: :c. �t.>'? .. ;�s",`` noted during the previous meeting and the follaving additional condition; ,�.:J;,: Yk::=��=`� . t3,�'i`x;,i. '�� - the applicant shall install "Baffling Spacers for sowid insulation in the garage �' which is to be used as a kennel. All dogs kenneled on the property rtwst be kept �'*�f,';;';:� inside the kennel building and no outside dog runs will be pennitted �-57�.`..�,n,. . �""`�" licant Susan MacMichael lained that the court decree overn ttte Hamwi �,.,.,;:: APP � 9 �4 � .�j:�`�Y.��' �i�i;`�-.` property required that he utilize a camnn access with the clinic property. She noted F a.'- w " that the applicant would be willing to consider relocating the existing access to the �h C � ��.�t '� west; the relocation of the existing access closer to the Hartnvi property line would, '�,"`^^"'�' perhaps, sezve to mitigate some of the ir�Qacts of the application. 's�,'��`'�;� �Y�V Y )1' T� �T 1 :Ti�=:<�:;• Crnnd.ssioner's Nleeting 8 August, 1983 - 1S i- ,�._ _ �_ _ _ __...,__�. ..;�' , � ',.�.:':;..'•;;,i; � . �Y f� � , .. � i 'q ��,.L. ��=tti4 s'� .:' ` �. .'.�� -. yr -+r . t- t c t 7 r; � �., a ��.?�t�,1�"�'�ii��F t"Vr rt s��. U�� ,� 1 �}`. .� �� cH C��'u � t ..' � �r �,r- �L�- � x.� �.F S�G��I�1ti �`� r�ft�ER`W}a Ft L 1 f�(�.� Jr'fr,�'t y`i � C� �� r f+-- f ��r i � �4�k rd i f y 1��.d Lr�+i��3�4 l'+� �.t +3 t}y'�4�,A"�.�f '�`k 9 � �' ��` � 6r Y"j r �� j.. '.rd' 1 .:t�t �' �,rv r �,'�. Jy -+S jri S� !..�t'.? t��n �t .,..� �.i.,�.�,.._.. ...�.��...y......cs..•..-::.?'s+.�*�•",�'.��._�...l�s,.�7�..��,,.t...,...L- i.�J,. .. �' , r_ .._ �.. .. . . .., . . � `:'.1 ,-1 i �':., ' Adjacent property awner Paul Hartwi agreed that, by court decree, he was required a to share an access with the clinic property. Ham�✓i was concerned, however, that he `r + would be retniired to share an access with a cart�ercial operation, and he did not art : r� :� . ' '� consider it appropriate for the Board to mandate such. The approval of the application � � by the Board would change the nature of the subject property fran residential to � :�., �. �� `� co�miercial; Hamwi was agreeable to sharing an access with another r�sidential unit ��'' althou h he was not willin to do so with a comnercial o �;'`'' ' 4 g peration, and he re �, quested �y that the cocmion access re �r guirement be deleted. r.Y�.�_-; r,.,_ `"'" Kinsley explained that the court decreed coimion access was requested by a previous ��$ ._ �"�;<:;:•;. Board so as to provide for no more than one (1) road cut a2ong this section of the ;.�::iti,�':. ' x Highway. Kinsley strongly supported this requirement, and indicated that he would not r `� approve anothes road cut for the HaaRVi parcel. " �' �� •,) Blake suggested that Hamwi pursue the relocation of the existing access closer to ,� '?� the Hamwi property. Hamwi e�lained that the relocation of the access would not 2k;d sexve to mitigate the irtg�acts of the clinic as he c�rould not be able to control the �ro i..`:�:.';;'�� use of the driveway by clinic clients. Hac[rtvi felt that he should be able to control � G . ^,�V__ traffic to his property, and he requested that the Board table the application r::�._ �` : pendi.ng resolution of the access issue. -''s �: � �,`� Blake indicated that he would be willing to review the access requirelnent and the � A `;;;:;;;� location of the Hamwi builcling envelape at a future date; today's meeting was � �.� . r,,,, ' intended to address the clinic use on the subject property, and not a review of ..,._- ;a:v;ia�. 4z4;�,�i previous litigation. i': �:��::<`,: t;a - Klanderud then moved approval of the application subject to the seven (7) conditions of the Planning Office and Blake seconded. �;,; {-` '. Environmental Health Director Tom Dunlop explained that, with respect to the noise "x , �::� t � '_ �L �� irtQacts, there were alternatives to the Baffling Spacers that could be as effective • ��:.. f'' yet less expensive. He suggested an amencLrent to the condition that would allow for Fa: �,1,. � � : ��",r those alternatives that achieve the same perfoxmance standard. ��A��M1•� 2'�.'�:,-� ��_ Klandenid amended her motion to include the follawing amended condition of approval: :•�.;°F ��"`�� - the a licant shall install "bafflin PP g spacers" or use other methods yielding as ��'' effective noise insulation, for sound insulation in the garage which is to be used �,.;j�,„ as a kennel. All dogs kenneled on the property must be kept inside the kennel >:, r';�3 building and no outside dog runs will be pei�nitted ��:=-; �� Blake agreed, and the motion as amended passed unanimously. Kinsley noted that he ` �t ��Y::;;; ;yn;; was also very willing to consider an alternative building location on the Hamai , Lt?;',', ''`' ro rt to rovide for eater distance fran the cli.nic �p�?;.ti: P Pe Y P Yr Parcel; he was not, hawever, `��'• willing to consider an additional road cut on the Highway, although he would support �,, �,, �rc�!r� the relocation of the existing road cut. Klandexud also supported this position. }��`:`�', ---------- {""��=:1 �,.;:_,., i.- r., � ��..� ��.� _.. ��.�.. _�_. _ __ .� . ;:;;.`:�; • _ -fii-.�_ift�7a 1 r �.� `� . Y F..; ^F�"""'�'�r ` �t,� s r :.: �rt 4 �'� . . . 1';- t ��4�1�,a�,f�%r� 1'r�yi- tr�. � �-11xi Y��.3� �,{ it.'r,7��'�i�� 0„_ � �x+� ��;�t y}i1r� ��+'y��:�. .�+:.�'°rx�:��.t:i:7iLf�Y[�{�-L.{:k'�.�«�;L[Jd:l_. a.i�A.._.L`ije?� i.�c,aiva�.:�T:. ��1Cr ..�:.$�t,.!n_.�_...s��5hr�:.. - R-� )-��, �...1 ;;"ISiegle Planner Colette Penne introduced the Siegle Subdivision Ex�ption, a request for Subdiv ;,{Exa�pt an exe�tion from the definition of subdivision for the ptupose of adjusting a lot ``,� line between adjacent parcels under separate ownership. The exe�tion request, for Lots ;#� �aenty-one (21) and 4Wenty-three (23), Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West, +'� ;�'� was submitted pursuant to Section 4-2.2(a)(2) of the Code, which provides for ;J,.�'�'. ;� such exe�tions subject to various criteria of record. The property owners, SSS �.�.; �}�r Tenancy a[�d Martin D Siegle, have agreed to adjust the lot lines between their � �� respective parcels by exchanging equal amounts of land; the exchange would allow the fozmer to construct an addition to the house on the property without violating the ;34 s_� sideyard setback requirements. (`� Referral cacments were generally supportive, and the Planning Office recartnended ;; approval subject to the following condition: • �.,_ . 'J - a plat be submitted in a form acceptable for recordation to be reviewed and accepted �;'. by the County Engineer and County Attorney � J�.,�'� !. .'�:� Penne noted that the applicant could have requested a variance from the Board of sy .1 �l Adjustment to allaa for the residenti.al addition, although in this instance the Land �`�� Use Code procedure was followed. �'� Blake moved approval of the application subject to the condition noted above, i'< � ''� Klanderud seconded and the motion assed unanimousl �::, p y. y'.�i ' ;i ��__�� 7: Z1ST Richard Grice introduced on first reading a pmposed anendment to the Land Use ��tead: = "'LUC Code that would allow for li or stores in the B-2 Zone District b s cial G= 9u Y Pe =,Amend ;;` ': iquor review. The Code provides for private Code/zoning changes once yearly; in thi.s �-' I��tore 'x_ t,�-2 instance, the amenchnent was requested by F.P. Stone, speci.fically to allow for a _,�one �_::� . ', retail liquor outlet in the Avport Business Center. Grice explained that the B-2 ��' f-; zone was intended to accomodate general sexvice com�rcial and industrial uses � , G;: �:- #'' not otheraise suitable for location in an urban settin Retail and residential uses `'j�' , 't: 5• �• within this district can only be allowed in direct support of the corcmercial/industrial �. t� uses, and subject to certain limitations; residential development, for instance, would �" .� be limited to one (1) such unit per bona fide business, whereas retail space vrould be 1• ` limited to eighty (80) square feet of gross leasable space per dwelling unit. The applicant requested the amendment on the basis that the subject zone was designed to allav for some level of retail support services, and as there is no liquor store outlet in the Business Center at this time. There are approximately one hundred and twenty-five (125) businesses within the Business Center that enploy approximately one � thousand (1,000) individuals, and there are approximately two hundred and fifty (250) residents. A liquor outlet would serve the needs of these residents and �loyees, ; as well as downvalley camiuters. ! Cce�missi.oner's Meeting . 8 August, 1983 - 17 Ls'.;..-,.-f;.�� . �'_ •;i ...._. . . . . . ._._._.. ._..__ _.v.. ...._. .__...... . MW".. .. . ....... .. 1� :.'�.i ..',fik._ i ' _ '�' �yfi�fi+ h \?� � �� f �( - ' `a ..,,4��j YI4�'�.� �,s:�,i'�; t Fry`r'U:�y -,- � Y�'h. t fl �i � i�ti.0 `. �'�_�` "i ��IG}1�++'4 r1 _ ,,->,'.:�'�r.�, �',�F,=.zir r�..._.r..�_w.�c.u;:_.. ...._._..,i:..::. .. . cF'�'��: 5,k ��- _.,t �u._ !. � ;'; a 4 { ( i .. I .,.i The subject artiendment was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Cartnission at their �.T.':: J ;ti ;, I regular meeting of 19 July; the Comnission re�nded that liquor stores be allowed � '� in the B-2 zone by special review and be considered a "personal sexvice outlet", and !''=�''I further, that the B-2 zone and its ersonal service outlet use table be amended to i,: P .i:., . � ''' reflect such. i,'. =.�::::"�° �: t - Kinsley expressed srnne concern with the potential for personal service outlets in � `. �r r �"''r-� the Business Center. Grice explained that such uses account for approximately four # �� t�^;_.-;; thousand, five hundred (4,500) square feet at this time, and that they can not exceed • £� seven thousand, six hundred and ei ht �:_^',� � g y (7,680) square feet. The acrount of available JYr",:., ;;;;;;,;.;:�'. retail space was based upon the nwd�er of residential units within the zone, and it 4� �;� �+�4.'� was considered inq�ortant that this relationship be maintained so that the Business ��=�:_� '�' Center would not becane a trade center. x f ' .�•�;,'j Gideon Kaufman, representing the applicant, explained that the artnunt of retail space "�� i in the B-2 zone was limi.ted by the number of residential units, and further, that E,.�:`� � residential development was limited by camiercial gr�th in the subject area. Given r ?��•i�'=:•'� these constraints, it was not felt that the area would become a trade center in its �,_;,�Y=:: �;.t i` :i own right. e::- ,a ' � ''°�^�'T' Madsen explained that he had been contacted by Burt Bidwell wkm, although unable to . y��.� ,� attend today's meeting, objected to the proposed amendment. Bidwell did not feel _-:.y'.'� that the Business Center was intended for retail businesses, questioned the amount of �:' �• � � '�``� tax revenue that would be generated by an additional store, and felt that there were � � too many liquor outlets in the cocmnu�ity at this time. ',� � '"`r� Klandezud noted that the zone allowed for both personal service outlets and special . Gs�`a.�"-'�". �-.','.,S'� ' . ,4 ,� review uses;if there was concern that the Business Center would become a trade center, < �2 a:; i ; , - the special review uses, such as the service station and restaurant, were considered : � . � r a greater catalyst for such than Y.he personal service outlets, in which case it may 2 `' � { ::. .� `� be appropriate to review the special review use table. She then moved first reading �` �r ;:I • � y' � approval of the amend�aient and to set the public hearing for 12 September, 1983 at �e ;^ � �� 11:00 a.m. Blake seconded and the motion passed with opposition from Kinsley. �' ` �� c?� t, ` ��3� Kinsley felt that the zone was intended for light industrial uses, and was concerned :��,� that it not become a shopping center. �y#�,-s_?'c'�?2 ---------- � �d�;;'+M'- �"�"��"�'Cheek .;,'1„ Richard Grice introduced a request for a refund of the e�loyee housing portion of .r>,��Subdiv: ��^: " Park the Cheek Subdivision Park Dedication Fee. The request, submitted by Gideon Kaufman �� '. Dedicdte ,�`' �Fee on behalf of the applicant, was made in conjUnction with a recent Code amendment that .�� ,.�' allows the Board to waive that portion of the F�e attributable to the �loyee housing . J..,,`';,> '-��"�-;;:" portion of a development. This waiver was previously limited to PFII-1 housing, �z'S4�f . ai..�-V�� r^�� CaRmissioner's Nleeti.ng 8 August, 1983 - 18 'i��'�.4.�,}�'� � . . � .. _ �, �'� _ . , t} ��r?r ,� ' — � � �+ ., .. .,w �E}��rCtl'�`'�° r. :t+, ?��r yG,ur '-'�t�t,n'y �� a¢ t1�� w��t ih. f f�h i�r K'�: � a�y, at r3,�n'�y '. .. n.��r,�z�5i � �w��i��2 t "1 ��t� �. f�� K'�k "('�a e�. 6` ur s.'-�. �Fx n 1 �t S<°x..,. 't 1.�P�' t � ..{: N'�i f�K ��+a K� ! a�,Y f ...� � rf�d.� �„� a �''�T'�'„�l�r'4 i 4� �r-'�� a�f73 `'b��+. q d -��+ H�C�� -� xt '� y . m:�;�. ��3,�'+ .,��.,�,_fs. ,'�*�`P�"''�i�,��4��i��r '�.,....., ,_._ i°�r.�'`y �"�'r�+�j,�rvt'.._t�.;., �, - � ;� i, although at Kaufman's request, the Board adopted a Code amendment that would allow for yx,,;,,;;,,;,;, � T ' a waiver of the Fee for all a�loyee housing. The total Fee for tl-� Subdivision was ",��:Y�.: � A�`�;:�'::.`.'` forty thousand, three hundred and forty dollars and ninety-one cents ($40,340.91); w} ` the applicant has requested a refund of that portion attributable to the e�loyee `� r-'-�.:^` �` ��:>:''::: � +��`...:. housing within the development, or eighteen thousand, three hundred and eighty-six �;� ,,.<' �;•• 3� `� dollars and sixty-seven cents ($18,386.67). '� i�a ^ ,rt'"x' Gideon Kaufman explained that the Fee was amended in April of this year as the )�•Y•�,.:• S'>r-.��:;; ��w,;:,-;'t �!�+?'i.��.'°+ amount of funds generated over the past several years was found to be insubstantial ,t�,._-...-�� "'=�;.�. �;R:;;�:�,a:2 and in an effort to facilitate the construction of �loyee housing in the car[minity. ��..��v-:i`..:. ��'��,' �"n��:i�{ The entise Fee was remitted by the Cheek Subdivision as such was due prior to the �-.�..� ��r.;.4 u�� '�� adoption of the amendment; the applicant would request a refund in the amount noted �� ;.�' above pursuant to the recent Code amendment governing the Park Dedication Fee. Y ��_� ' Blake moved to grant a refund to the Cheek Subdivision in the a�rount of eighteen v� � � �� f thousand, three hundred and eighty-six dollars and sixty-seven cents ($18,386.67), `•'�;�4-.s�s= Kinsley seconded and the motion passed with opposition from Klanderud, who opposed the ��K�[:f'.rift`: I �1±��'�4�7) C�E amenchnent lt$e�. � � i�:l�'`.�?`T."'F� j Fy .w� �:�.�� ! ��j;�{t��L� �_�_______� �. •'. F'"�� '�'::...��4�1'N `-,;.`+�':-„� There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. -:� . :_"..;.y�;� ',�� ,.",-'aC:n�1 i(:':.i_ : .ti� ��_�� I,� � S.['��S� I � k�� Y �i �"1 .��:�•� � �[ L- +�*'{-v Tn �`� /l ' . g� „�'r t}! a .� Respe t r y Submitted, AP : f ;�. �r; � Z��"�� ,�,��.:- ; w��='�;Y;: '1i Y;C unty Clerk en, Cha;*••�n Y':y",..�''':,r...i rp,,s''w.,?;. / ��y� x � Yu � �-"�.,�a'`�i ��-�- �r z ry � r��y� � ��,� � '`�� .�g' . i -'re� � ,,^ i : 14T 1 �,.m;...,y . 4�"� � . . ',�,��J . � •.�j�{{,' ' I I ��. 1 _ +��e :i�;� ' i aw�S t ti:. _' '•�'�.b+�: #;".�-;,:;.�il Cannissioner's rleetin S A t 1983 - 19' 1983 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING EXHIBITS August 8 Aspen Music Schoo11041 A Memorandum Dated August 8, 1983 from Alan Richman, S ecial Review Planner,to Board of County Commissioners B Land Use A lication—Music Associates of As en,Inc C Letter Dated June 30, 1983 from Nicholas Lampiris,Consulting Geolo ist,to John Doremus D Memorandum Dated June 21, 1983 from Hako Kuhn,Aspen Sanitation District,to Alan Richman,Planner E Memorandum Dated June 28, 1983 from Jim Markalunas, Water De artment,to Alan Richman,Planner F Memorandum Dated June 23, 1983 from Thomas Dunlop, Envirorunental Health,to Alan Richman,Planner G Memorandum Dated June 22, 1983 from Ron Thompson, County En ineer,to Alan Richman,Planner Aspen Racquet Club Special H Memorandum Dated August 8, 1983 from Richard Grice, Review and Commercial Planner,to Board of County Commissioners GMP Exem tion I Special Review Application Aspen Racquet Club Clubhouse Ex ansion Amendment J Letter Dated August 8, 1983 from E.J. Obermeyer to Board of County Commissioners Expansion of Sundeck K Memorandum Dated August 8, 1983 from Richard Grice, Restaurant—Commercial Planner,to Board of County Commissioners GMP Exemption and Special Review L Land Use A lication—As en Skiin Com any Conveyance for Senior M Memorandum Dated August 3, 1983 from Marie Mactavish, Housin Human Services,to Board of Coun Commissioners Public Comment N Letter Dated August 8, 1983 from Stirling M.Cooper to Board of Coun Commissioners 37 , ,, MEMORIINDUM TO: Pitkin County Board of Commissioners FROM: Alan Richman, Planning OffiCe RE: Aspen Music School 1041 Special Review DATE: August 8, 1983 bDAIiD Oi co. co:::.��r,�� PITKIN C0. Zoning: AF-1. • Pub � . ' Duto �HIBIT , Lot Size: 22.4 acres. • •.. � • Sub� Location: Castle Creek Road. T�h. _ -�3 Applicant's . Request: On February 15, 1983 Tom Dunlop of the Environmental • , Health Department wrote a letter to the MAA advising them that the well water supply system and septic . tanks serving the Castle Creek campus contain major deficiencies and require upgrading. Tom noted that recent water samples showed contamination of the supply which was probably due to leachate from the existing on-site wastewater disposal facilities. Tom therefore issued an enforcement action and � requested the development of a workable plan for both the water and sewer systems to eliminate the . � health hazards which are present on the campus. In response to these requests, the MAA has engaged various consultants who have d'eveloped plans to connect the campus to the City water system and . _ , Aspen Metro Sanitation District sewage treatment • • system. Under the terms of- Section 5-A07.1(a) (1) of the Code, the extension of a water or sewer system to serve 20 or more people is an activity of local and state interest, subject to 1041 special revi�w. . The applicant requests your special revieiy appro•aal . to extend these services to their Castle Creek campus. Referral Comments: The Environmental Health Department reviewed this application as to its impacts on air and water quality and noise abatement. Their attached memorandum recommends various standard mitigation techniques to resolve any problems which may result from disturbance associated with this project. The Bngineering Department provided iniormation as to ihe requirements for an applicant who is doing ' . work within a County right-of-way. Ron also suggested that a site specific geologic study be performed to ' ensure that no adverse impacts result irom the activity on steep slopes and crossing Castle Creek. . The applicant had Nick Lampiris walk the entire length of the two utility alignments. Nick and the engineers for the project believe that the most troublesome section will be the driveway from the bridge over Castle Creek to the intersecti.on with Castle Creek Road, since a 10 foot separation is required between '� the two pipes (for health reasons) . Nick has made various recommeiidations to ensure the stability of the slopes which the proposed lines must cross, which should be adhered to by tlie applicant. ,Kemo: Aspen Music School Page Two . August 8, 1983 The Water Department and AMSD have indicated the feasibility of providing tne requested service. , Jim Markalunas states that Council has already agreed to a financing arrangement for this improve- ment. ' Heiko Kuhn comments that the District Board met on this proposal July 11 and agreed to pay for the extension of service from the Castle Ridge Apartments - to the Music School's driveway, up to a maximum of . $191,U00. They have also agreed to annex the campus as an enclave (that is, not annexing into the . district those areas between the City and the campus) . • and are now proceeding with the necessary legal proceedings in this regard. . , The Environmenal Coordinator saw no problem with this request. We did not receive comments from our referral to the Division of Wildlife. We did, however, receive a late comment from the Bureau of Land Management that they own .land in the vicinity of this project and require any crossing of their land to be reviewed. Therefore, they indicated that if the applicant finds that the project will necessitate the crossing of any BLM land, right-of-way permission must be obtained from the BLM office in Glenwood Springs. My contact with the applicant's engineers indicated that no such crossing wouI.d occur. Neverthe- less, we recommend addition of the appropriate condi- tion to satisiy the comment by'BLM. Planning Office • Review: • The Planning Office was asked by the County Manager to assist the applicant by expediting the review of this a lication to the de ree ! Pp , g possible, as a service to M11A and in order to help clear up a j significant health hazard. � � . According to Section 2-10 0{ the Code, it is the � policy of the County to discourage utility extensions i to areas .not suitable for the type or amount of ; development necessary to support the service. It is also the policy of the County to regulate utility extensions in a manner such that services are constrained to areas adjacen� to existing development and which are already served by other public facilities. • Furthermore, according to Section 2-25 of ihe Code, • it is the policy of• the County to provide for efficient phasing of public services and to prevent ' the location of activities and developments which may result in significant changes in population densities. The Planning Office asked the applicant to address the prior policy statements to ensure that the utility extension would not result in a "leap£rog" growth pattern or otherwise increase the development potential outside of the already developed portions . of the metro area. A•ccording to the appli.cant, the ; potential service area for this extension includes the camPus, five existing residential units and five potential residential units. The applicant's sewer • � system reort indicates that individual pUmp stat9.ons ;�/� would be required of mo,t of the users, possibly making ihem cost prohibitive. Furthermore, since the � �� AMSn is annexing this area as an enc].ave, it is �� unlikely that any improvec3 service capabilities will � be available to any entity other than the campus itself. lt�mo: Aspen Music School Page Three ' ' August 8, 1983 i � t The applicant suggests that the extensions do not create additional growth in the area but instead provide upgraded service for those already living in the area, along with those who own existing tracts who may build residences in the future. Recognizing � that the primary intent of the extznsion is to relieve a health hazard on the campus, the Planning Office does concur with this statement. The applicant notes that the improvement in water and sewer services will - allow for the possibility of £uture expansion of . the campus facilities. Planning Office . Recommendation: ' The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this � item at their regular meetingon July 5, 1983. The • Planning Commission and the Planning Office recommend that the Board of County Commissioners grant special review approval to the proposed extension of water and sewer service to the MAF1 Castle Creek Campus, subject to the foZlowing canditions: 1. The applicant will comply with the air and water quality impact mitigation techniques suggested by the Environmental Health Department to control construction impacts and will seed disturbed areas after construction to control long term fugitive dust problems. � 2. The applicant will comply with the requirements • . . . for obtaining a road cut permit irom the • • Engineering Department. 3. The AMSD will agree to provide the service requested by the applicant. 4. The applicant will adhere to the recommendations � for soil stability included in i�he letter from Nick Lampiris to John Doremus dated June 30, , 1983. P&Z will be given an opportunity to review the final alignment and constzuction methodology � for the utility extensions to ensure that the impacts of crossing the stream and steep slopes � are mitigated. ' 5. Pitkin County should consider the possibility of ' providing a trail along the shoulder of Castle Creek Road after it has been disturbed by this project. � Following P&Z's review on July 5, the AMSD did agree to provide the requested service; therefore, Gondition #3 can be deleted as part of your approval. This condition should be replaced by a new condition requiring the applicant to obtain permission trom the BLM if the extensions are found to cross any land owned by that agency. ' 1 �, In order that we may expedite this matter for the � applicant, we have attached a resolution designe� to complete your action on this matter at this time. � . � � i • . � I i � � • ' • 7;,^,I.�;D (:- i;0. (: . PiT;;L•1 Cr. � �� • ; • ru>>i EXHIBIT . . C::i)jG � /! , . � . ... ... _.__._ ... ___..�__ • _'. ' _- . • . " ' . __. .__ .. -c:21. 'S -_..�._..__�_'_." i • �� . . . i � �IT:�I11 COUNT�I r�:o��ti• �+��u,:� .. : �� Scction/Purccl '� � � , . .;. ` June� 1983 '1'�;•"•- JJ�lJD US1i APPLICATIO�� FORM DAT� SUBMI7'TED c _ ��:..f. . — 5 . • • . ' • • • ' • 7'O BE•COFIPLE7'SD DY Ai'I'LICANT: ' . . . � i NnMC Music Associates of Aspen, Inc. � Attn: John Doremus, Vice Pres. : At�1)N�:ss P.O. Box AA, Aspen, Colorado 81612 • • � � , . ' • � PnUt.� 925-3254 � NN�lE 0[' PROJI:CT t'lAA WATER AND SEWER LINES ' . . � PROJeCi LOCATION: (Un attached shcct, locatc on zn�inq rnap, shoving tx�undaric: i of any naturnl ha:�r.d ind •rc:�ourca arcas, any othcr spcci.al ' regulatnxy <listricts, Sectic.n S, 1.:►nd U�e C�de; atid locaC�_ �. on appropriate CSU/F[:A rsaps any arcas not covcred by the ! . a}wve.) . . . _ • -F. . TOTAI. �IRrA Area of AiN� Campus - 22.9 acres __ L Exis1•zNC. USE(s) Institutional - Music 'School (summers) ' . Y�.f - Private Day School (wiriters) _ � — — - � Pnorosr:� UsL(s) Same - no change _ (ap�roximate savare ' • � fovtagc for each) nIa v _ . � _ ( 9 1'RfiSENT Zn�J.inG nF SITE AF^1 _ � . � DrSCitTPT10N Or LANG USIi PltorosN, propose to connect to City Water System t �;� . � . -- and Aspen Metro Sanitation District Line in•order to conform to - county and state health department standards. . ' . � :, �—. - . -_ • __ -- � ( To'u� co::r:.,TiTiip ifY T�ui 1�I�117NIt:G OP:'ICE • . I . i } 7'Yi�1: OF APPLICAT)C;!: . IUi'LU:71NC ' � SUR�)IVI.riIOFJ ' � . . � P.L'.p. � EY.Ti�iPTI0:7 SPF:CIAL P,EV11:t+1 35-acYC a• :UDQ:VISICt1 � '� � 13U1LpIt•; I'rf:i�;IT T'i:VIEW RCVITW PI{AST•.: Pf•1:-1PPL7CATI012 A.R. 5/20/83 AATE COI!f'I.E9'::D � ' ''; GG;+L•'Ii1�L SUG:•fI5SI01� P.C. i�C1'10:7 _ D7.TR • � , • � •p0).RD ACTTON. UlifC ' �' � Dl•:1'rI1.1:.7 SU!l:dl.iSTO'.7 P.C: 7�C'iION n��+r ; � � _ DAI.1+D i�CTTUN DA'fB j � • F71bli 1"f.AT � ]., C0.1i� hCT'IOtJ pATls' t . ' • . . ----- �..� . ..,,.....-...,r._..,r.� w. ...r.,,...•,-�-.,,....-_.....�..,. .._ _.r. . . � . � , '�-_'�. �• • -- .,. .` _ �... , ,.: , -r4...r -_.- '�''�.�,f�_ .�...� , �.:� � � � —,�..;.—._..— ,,, „ � : ( �iA, 91I$IILT I�IDS . ` � ��-• ' •�'_.�,,,-- . . : • 1 � � � ,`�, � ! . �- � . �... . ..�. . ..r� ! . T �� .r. � � a ' . •�.......� ' -- -• -•� A$_1`% �'a. J� . . � G,;. _�. .�� ,j��: '7.�' `�-T• � �...-....� i :�� ` 's . '� �' ��2-30''�-�ti. � ,�; � � : � ---� �'� C.�>. `:`_�=_�� _ ��. .. , ��'" _� �� , . � . :�:� �� .,-� �-.----�t.. �---�� .\� ` � �� R •__� � \ � 1� 4. ___.,_.��A� �`� AF-2 . .`. � `, �~ �� : .:.` � ''_ � ` _ � SUBJECT� . :. � �c�� l� ..--- �. � . ��a PROPERTY�4��6iEADOR'OC�D_�,, J T . ' - �' f ^ /-- - —' �` i�?��1� ,_Y" � t�� 't,�'��:�- ,�`'�". _" .�' � � ,--:-.--.__.l..:_ :.��- .._'-'`� � <<*:,t-.� � •- -`� Q 'jHOSPIT f �- , �� —=�- ,�-.� � � �� ;,,�- � - �---. � �I.` �� ti��"�'` �'" f1F_2 PUD � •d_...�-•�~;�`�t. •, �./ �? . � (/� __ � _ v;,;�. / I. i i i • Y �"�\.' "�� --°�.. ..-_...1 �-� _ `�,....-.' R 'i�.r�,c�~ .� '� ��. . .� Y"�...- • �..• �� 1 ' .' • ;��` •� �� _� . ^ �`';�_y _ �r��^ _`—,; _. �� / `. .. '�`— ��j— :=—��'—j�- . � .h r-7 p ./,t%�l . , �„ �f � � �( ��- �-� �' � �, ! . - � r -;� , y I_ �,.��-,� � �`,�. %�� ...r • ..il �#l�lS -- � .•r-�� .-„ � r � _ ' ��1'` . _ �� '.`• � /-�ll ��'" =•1_j3'1-i , �r.�''.�`��T� .�. -.�` �� ei -'"J°T'� � - . ___. �1,. ,=�_:-.:� ' . ,-�. �--� • �/.r7?„ �fiFrl'_�;_: � ;l�,f`;;.,��,^ . Y ��'�--�:�. \•, • ' \ � )/-f- �r1 • .�r= l.'_ � �^� ��.'�� ! 1, �' '1'"►'C�S•{_/_ �.f { �.1.�•` .� t! .4�." '• :'- , ••.:'•'� ' � -__- �� - �'�� • -- ;_ ' r.C'L ��1�,1.•�Ir -�'',�'.." .'��'''' \ �'�;=.. j - - �-� `- •� - . :� -�f�; .?� -ir� � � � =�:~ :,�'� ;��.. -:��t - ,� � .,��•t� .� � � '``!� ��_ . �. -=-r =' - -��-f'I� � � 'o�� ,., �;. � , - � .. . - �:��_ =--r�� . •�� L -C'=.;y' �o �.�y..!_}-� � �r-. , ' � Ar-i ' C%�`.'1.'1 1l( � r � -�r ' :'r��.`�-�-f' ''/r /!r� - x�" • ( . • . �:f./�- =Z�.� -��J'(�_,,�,'i +' /.��"�;l�� '�•'� � f; .— �� I �' . - : � .% � T �. _ t'�Y'�z ,�� f. , ':f- � /,. �s; , . . r, -�� , - �'`�,�-� _ 1 --" / �. . �. •`� f^;.��2^a:, 1� . �"��` �� . . 4� ".%;:"'.4 ' ..v . ...... \ V ' t � �� " � I %�:•X v'�-I")� -'y�! � _ . _\ . `o � �l . _r� �. L_ ?,�--.�7-�� f ,: ' H .,� �� I �, �--`_�,��--� _ �.�• � - __ � . ._ -� , •;, � �1 � i r . ��:'�- [C1 � �r • i- .vx.. . � E i �-�_ . . .j I. . . tt��: 1 w:=�_l l`- S�� ' i ..C-�. �•. f ` � ��\�\� � J '[-.+- _:N_ _ _-��'- • ,• ,+ ,1 .'1 � � ' • ' • ->.t�.�.�.'j; _'--� /-r" _ � ;,JJ ' � • t � � ,.•� . I './:�=�;?" i ^ . ; •�` , . � •��. \ �� .Y • ' �� ' � e.♦ , i�� \ t• '-'.��'��' � _ • �� ' � ��•. .�:'� : �.. -- . . . . _.� , , - ~ J,,' '-"y � VICINITY I�iAP • � •-�'��--. . • ,�_ � � . + ,� ( � y � -- � � ' MAA INC. FILING N0.1 � � d ' i � • �- p� ''� LOCAT�D IN S�CS. 13&14,T.10, I " _.. -• ' .: tU '" R.85,1Y.6Pnf.PITKIN CO.COLORADO � �.� /�: .,�� . L�J ,� � ' . , • • '� � •.SCALr:1"=2000' � JUNE 1983 � �,:� � , . , • • ,�,: � � .� - . . . . �-��-e�a�� z �c�c�� , ' .. . . � �i WY.1Uil�(�.MI�]I�.W?1�.�:1��'iMn�v� .�]I��•�.[.nlp�n�lUXlf.11•XiYql.'.LIIW ��-��'�.'�^I • � +* ��...�r.�� `...��+..�.. . . ....__._...._p._....e....v ....._._"- __.�_...... . .d . ... _." "_.__.__... � / � , ' .. .... .. ...."'". ..., ..... , . . . . I .fl• • ,� • ^J . .. � . ... ..� ' .. • APPLICATION SUMMARY , - • .• � ?.. , .. . . .. , . . . ! _ This application is for Special Review Approval to construct a i � r�' water main extension and a new sewer line from the 'Music Associates � of Aspen's Castle Creek Campus along Castle Creek Road to the Aspen � � .�.t . � � � ' Water Ylant and the existing sewer line serving the Castle Ridge � project. Early this year the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health ; . Department advised the MAA�of major deficiencies in our existing a.F . � � wells and septic systems. One of our two wells has shown•by tests to be contaminated. The sewage disposal systems are old and do not � � ' 1 conform to current standards. For the. full particulars of the ':_: 1 existing systems and their deficiencies, see letter attached to �' � , � . ; this application from Tom Dunlop, Director, Aspen/Pitkin Environ- � � mental Health Department dated February 15, 1983. • � . . : ) ., � . • . � • : i As a result of this concern, the ApplicanL- engaged the consulting , � � • : � services of Flood-Cloninge`r Engineers to develop a plan to Lpgrade . : - � these s��stems. The Flood-Cloninger report dated April 29, 1983 � ' i � "_ " ; - - is attached to thi� application. At about .the same time,• the � � � engineering firm of_Rea, Cassens and Associates, ConsulL-ing Engineers ' � for the Aspen Water Department, made a proposal L-o serve the • ` i:�' Campus with City water at a cost which would be competitive with j new wells. See letter with esL-imated cost of construction from ' � ;� , Rea, Cassens and Associates to Wayne Chapman, City Manager, dated �; � May 16, 1983 a�.tached to this Application. � � � ' � -_ • . . . • , � '$+� • . .-- , . _-- � - - .- -- _ � � As a result of the above studies and proposals, the Board of Trustees � I� of the rtAA has made the decision to connect to City water aL- the . � • _ • . . . .', .� ' . .. . .: _ ... . � . • / 1 ;<_ . . � ' .' • • '. _ . . � . . . ' y , J 's' , . . • • 3. , . i ��'"c""'�---- . __��_.��— _...___,..--, . .. _... . � , . , i . � ' . ' � i� . , . . . . . . ; "' . :: , . . . , . . . .:;, 4 earliest possible date so that the Campus would have treated �. ::' water service tihis winter for the Aspen Coutttry Day School �' � i • :'; . � •.> operation. Additionally, the Soard seeks approval to install •.:r. a' sewer line from the Campus along Castle Creek Road to the i =��,.,. � �;_-�. Castle Ridge Project where it intersects with the Aspen Metro- politan Sanitation District System. Preliminary talks with the I ` �:r . • .'s: AMS District have elicited a favorable response to this proposal, ' _,��:.; however a service plan for annexation into the District must be I .. I .� developed with expected construction of the line in 1984. 1�. ... . -. �� • . . . ' ' . I � � ��'• . ' � In' summary, this application requests approval to construct nec- . :.... I ..� • . essazy facilities in order to maintain the operation of two vital � ::�1 ' "and necessary enterprises in the community, namely: The Aspen � ,a.. � � Music School and Festival and the Aspen Country Day School. There I :'�,.. y ' is no expansion of facilities involved in this' improvement. . � � *:s•. . ' ' , . ' . . ; -- � � - " - - -- � • . . . . . . . _ . . . . � .y� . .._� . . . . � ,.. _ . . . : . . .. . . � '• ' ' � ._ ��i.'�. . . . . . . .. . . . � __ . . . -. • •• .. . • • ' _ � , _ . ,� " , . . .•.t; ... . ... .. . .. .F�:_�. . .. ' ' . . . '.. . . � .'.. ..,a.�. . ..t . -• -. _.... � . �� . . . .. . .. , . . . .. . . �. . . . . .. . . �. . . . . _ . �� .. _... ..-- -, . . . . , � '..l. '" . . . . _ �. . Y . . , , . � - , � . ' ' , . ..... . . . � '' - .. _ . . .c. .. `..: . . ' .. . . . . ' . r � , . . �. `-r:ji • � . . . • . �. . . . .• . � ��' =-• �"'_: ._ ' '-. . �.. � � . .. .. . ' . . . � ' . .. . �.... . � .. ..� I _ ( . . • . • .. . . .. . '. . • .... . .. ' . . ' . . ' • . � - ... . ... . . . . � j� .-� � . . . . ': ` . . , I ;� - • . c • . . ' .. . .. .. ..t• .. • . ... , . .. . . . , . ,•'•. , '` � ' . . . . �.. . .. . . ,y . . . .. , . , • �� • • ' ' . � / .' ' •' . f i . � . ' �. . .. ... . � . , � . � , ' � • � . .. `.� . � ' � .. . , • � • . � ' . . . � . . . �• � . . :� . • . . . 4. �"*—a:�tn*..�-.:.,•.-:,..�,.s� . :s.:- .... .....'.^r!'.�`R'7�"sz4:�tac+-•��.r�....k.�..n......,�.,.y.-enu,w...:�..•.. � . � � ' ` + � � l _._._._—_' --�---- —�.__`�_..__ --�----�--....._..—_-'�--`—�".r- .__ _ _......... . . . ._ . : . � ; . . ' - . __.... .........._. .. . . _ _._.__• �. .., �.._...._.._�....--- - -• � � , .. , ' � • ' i. � � . • . u � CONFORMIINCE WITH APPLICABLE POLICIES OF THE PITKIN COUNTY LJ�ND USE CODE + . � i �,.� 5-203 Logical Extension of Utilities: . . : � �� i � Sewer -.The Flood-Cloninger Report estimates that the 'service area � • � 4 � �would have a potential for 20 E4R's (equivalent residential units) t � �. -. - of which the Music School Campus would be la. There are 5 exist- � ; ing and 5 potential single family residential units which could I be future users, bu:: individual pump stations would be required I , . ! for most of these. A description of the system including location, . � � type, size of line is described in the aforementioned Flood- , - < i j.��+'. Cloninger RGport on page 9 and designated as Alternative S-2C. � f ! � The location of the line will-generally be as shown on the attach- � i ed plan map. . � � • . . . . _ • • . , . j ; . • . ' I � Water - The Flood-Cloninger Report specifies the design criteria � +� for the water system stating thaL- the peak requirement would be � . 7,500 gallons per day with a peak one hour demand of 31 gallons � � �": � . per minute. There will be no external irrigation use. The type � ; � � of line proposed, including engineering standards, type and size � � ! i 2.T , - � ` of pipe, etc., ..is outlined, along with costs, in the Rea, Cassens � � and Associates letter attached. The general aliqnment of the � � t water line will be as shown on the attached plan map. . ' ;' i� . . . ' � . . ... • �. i� These extensions, in our view, do not create additional growth (' I� in the Castle Creek area, but rather provide upqraded service �� j� for two importarit utilities for those already living in the area '' i . and for those, tracts owned by potential homeowners. There is no i :Y� ' , , . ' � � . .. • . . . . . � . �'•�.. ' . . • � ' • �. ;.. +: . : . . , . . � . . 5 . . . , , .. , . . , ��.�..,a,..........�..�..�T,,.�..�...»:,.. . .••--------- - -._... _ .. i , . . --- - i . � I � � ` , � : � . � ----__ _---------------------------.___._.._.....- -_. -------------------__ - , . � . . . ' . � .. . � other land available foz development in the area which could b� • ' . , . � = served by these line extensions. It is only fair �to say that with this major improvement in water and sewer services, further inprovements and expansion of the Aspen Country Day School and rlAA facilities is possible. Finally, the water line .extension ' will provide significantly improved £ire control, not only for the Campus, but for the existing dwellings in the area. ' � Piaster Plan Gro�vth Rate: • � . - Neither of the utilitg projects involve any commercial or � residential development, although thev.will increase water •� � j • service capability. This increase is necessary to adequately ; � serve the MAA and ACDS schools. The line� extensions are not �;� • expected to require the addition of any perr.ianent employe.s. � �`�� ' . - '�� • . . • • a.. tiazard and Resource Areas: '�� ' The line extensions will be located in areas or consL-ructed in ::;� . , i such a manner so as not to 'increase man-made or natural hazards ; �� . . . . • . . . �� ' i _; ,��'�-. or otherwise constitute a nuisance. The off-site facilities . . J I •will be constructed almost entirely on road rights-of-way or + '� � other previousZy disturbed easements. Standard mitigation measures, ! �� as required by the Co].orado &L-ate P:ater Quali.ty Control Division, ! , •S� . . ' . . � � will be enplo��ed to rinimize strear.i turbiflity problems in Castle � �. . . I -� :pi:' Creek for the required crossings. To the extent that the water ( � . . � ' � 2ine might disturb wildlife paL-terns, the disturbance will be - � . � � temporary, lasting for a feo� weeks during the construction period. �� • ;�' • . ' . . ' .. . ". . . �� . : , . . . .. � . ' . • ' . � .' ' , ( �`� ' • � 6. . . . . • : . ' ..�_.._... , ._.._._. � � .�-----; -°---. - - .._....,...... .._.. ..,. .�.r•m• . � � ' � + _ ...... __._..--... -- ` . ..�.�., �__ ___,_ �� „�,n , , . . . . . . _.._ . �.---. ....._. ............. .. •.__. .., _ �- � --. ... . ---.... ._.. ...__...__......�...__._ _..._ -- __.. __ .. � , � Soil, Surficial Geologic Characteristics: � � • • _ ; • ... . • , . : . � `.': .. - �. � . � tio soil or surfici.al geologic characteristics are known to �� exist in the project area which would affect the structural I s integrity of the projects. Best soil management techniques � �' will be enployed during construction of these lines to minimize � _ � soil erosion and any adverse v�ater qualit�� impacts 'that other- :��,� . � ; wise might be created. Disturbed topsoils will be stockpiled . . f �;� for subsequent replacer.tent and all disturLed land will be � reseeded with natural species. • i t;:� .�. . .. � � Drainage: . .. ..:. : . . . . . , . ,� - ;�.. I " • . ! The line extensions will not result in any alteration of exist- i.� � . �r. (� ing natural drainage areas. Disturbed areas Yrill be restored ��r, to their original contours and revegetated. , � '�� Impacts on Road System:.. ^. . . -, • .� ' ' . '''��' ' The construction ot these utility lines t�ill involve a minimal �� • � # increase of construction vehicle traffic during the construction •''�` period. There will be a temporary period during construction � � � Y�here controlled one-��al traific 4�i11 be necessitated. Con- � �� , struction docunents for the ,contractors tn�ill require standard • signaqe and flagman control r:easures during this period of con- ��.' siruction on tre Castle Creek Road. All disturbed paved areas "''^�� and shoulders of the Castle Creek 'Road will be restored accord- :� ' , ing.to County standards. " , � • . . . , . .� . .. . . , . . , , , . . . . . . � ._ . . , � . . , . .. . . . . . . . • � � .. . ,. . . .. .. � . ' . . . . . � . . . �° . .; �- . . . , ..., • . � . . .._ . • � . ' . ' :` �' _ . . ' .. ' . . . • ., .. ` . . , . . � . . .. , . �� . . . . . ,C . . . 1 .. . .. . . • '. . , � . 1 � . '. , : . . . � •� ' • � � . - . . . . , . . . , . . �>> � � . .I•.. . . . .. .. , �. . . . .' 7. ' `' .. . • . ' • • .. . .. . .. . . . , . '� . . . . . . 4 � � ; . . , . � : � . . ��.._� - • - --....___��..____._...�.__I._._.....,.._.._,_--.._ ---.:.i.:._..__ 11 ^� Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D. � CONSUlTIN6 GEOL061ST . • PO DOX 10935 • , ASPEN,COLQRADO 81611 ,� i i•1_ �.; .;'i,`:; (303)925-6020 ' :::T'� CQ. � . EXHIBIT _ � • June 30. 1983 � � V � � • Mr. John Doremus � • � � - c% Doremus & Co. � ' . � • , , �• P.O. Box 224 ' 602 T. Hyman Ave. ' � Aspen� Colorado 81611 ' RE� tVater and sewer alignments� M.A.A. . ' . .. Dear John: • ' • I visited the site of the Music School on Frid�y, and then again on Tuesday. June 28. with A.J. Zabbia. Jr., of Rea. Cassens & Associates, Inc. and Ron Cloninger of Flood-Cloninger kY�gineers. We walked the entire length of the two alignme�ts and I believe we all concur that the most troublesome section v�ill be the driveway from the bridge over Castle Creek to the intersection with Castle Creek Road. The reason for this is that between the sharp cut on the left side of the road (+vest) and the steep drop-off to i;he right (east) there is very little room to place both ti•rater and sewer lines �vith the proper separation. In this and other simil.ar situations, we do not want to either remove the toe of the cut bank or trench a:,y closer than five feei: of the drop-off. It is my understandin� that a ten foot separation is necessary between the water pipe and the sewer pipe, and that the water pipe must be at least lF3 inches over the sewer pipe. Toward �Chis end it was agreed that the water line would be closest to the cut bank on the west. Once up on the Castle Creek Road, the placemerit of the two lines becomes easier because there is much more room to work � with. The se�•rer line will have i;o be placed v�ith care in the � vi.cinity oP the sharp left curve in the Castle Creek Road ivhere there is a very high bank in unconsolidated glacial moraine material to the tivesi:, and a steep bank down to Castle Creek on the east which shows recent slope failure signs. The cut; bank contains some very large protruding boulders, which, if dislodged. cou].d prove a hazard during construction. � If lar�e boulders are encountered in excavati.on in i:he vici- ; nity of existing structures, they should only be blasted with �. � , . . c • • t • . � ' , ` . . . . j . : ' � � , . � I ,`4, _.. ....�..._..__..._.__ . ..W..�....__,.�.... -- - '3.Sr... � - t� � • �i • , j • � . / , . � • � � June 30, I983 . l Water and Sewer Alignments, M.A.A. Page Two � . • • ' great care. Since there will only he the sewer Zine in this ,� ' area, it should probably be just west of the center line to be as far as possible from the slope failure axeas� and yet away from the steep cut bank. � • The water line Which must come down to the Castle Creek Road from the city-owned water plant on the hilltop west of here, ma,y be along one of several alignments. Each of them must descend the steep hillside down to the Castle Creek Road in unconsolic3ated silts, sands� cobbles and boulders of glacial moraine "b" of Auarternary age. The best vray from a geologic standpoint would be to come straight down the fall Zine alang � • an existing power right-of-way, thereby avoiding the transec- tion of the slope wii:h a long� oblique cut to the south. This alignment would approach the Castle Creek Road in the vicinity of Gary Jacobs drive�•ray. From here the water-line would trend up-valley some 20 to 30 feet west of Castle Creek . Road, presumably with aspen trees as a visual barrier. It could then cross to the nYusic School road in the vicinity of that intersection, or� preferably, proceed further up the Castle Creek Tioad, across it and straight dowri the steep bank to the bridge area on the Music School property. This would avo9.d having to try to accomodate both lines along that narrovr road �vay. Again. a trench down the faZl Zine wouZd not create nearly as much slope instability as one which transects the hillside. These are my preliminary observations. If there are further questions� or if s�te speci�ic �vork is necessary, please do not hesitai:e to contact me. Sincerely, . • � �.` � ' ��it ` d�Lt� ' icho as Lam iris � . Consuli;ing Geolo�isi; NL/c1Y. � � ,. ,i ...... ... . ........ .. . .. ._..._.. ... . . . . _... , .... _ . ._.._.. ...._:.�_....,..,.�....,,..-....,..,.-.�.,�...<,..,..:,.,,�.----,�.. • . . � . • � • , . , 4 \ ... �,. . , . • EXHIBIT � . . : , ' � � , � -F-,�l i _ ._.�.-.-,....�.:_. .....:»a:...��..�_�....__..r-_-_��-'___._,... _._._. • ' -. _._�..........._..-- ��,......,...._:.L--°- - - - -_w! • . �:. ' MEMaRANDUM TO: Environmental Health, Tom Dun�op . � I County Engineer, Ron Thompson � County Environmental Coordinator, Mark Fuller i . � ity Water Department � � Aspen Metro Sanitation District • �' Division of Wildlife, Raridy Cote . ; PLANNER: Alan Richman • ' RE: Aspen Music School 1041 Special Review ' DATE: June 21, 1983 ' We are expediting the attached aPplication for 1041 special review approval which seeks extension of the water and sewer system £or the Aspen tdusic School, which is a matter of state and local interest. Specifically, the application proposes to connect the Music School to the City water system and to Aspen Metro Sanitation in•order to . conform to County and State Health Department standards. in'e have placed the item on the July 5 County P&Z agenda, so please revie�a the material and return you comments to the Planning O£L-ice no later than June 27, or as soon as is humanly possible. Thank you for your anticipated expeditious response. lI'� /,SI'L'� (r.0�..t��rrsnran. $f��-�ThT�or+ /�/17.c�c: , . /�{AS (i or��. . � '"O . r}Cte�-e7 'j'HE SE..�,a .r._�/..�' F/t�'7 7NE CRCrtr •, . Yt�ro�e_ /Jo �i�..c P�caJe�� - 7'� �-!�1 e �► l�a�r..a . `r OF THL' �'t�ctG Sc��oa� . .+�' t=/�'A.,c e> 1-N e /'Q u�E'c.r /� C 5 7� �.�-�e.c. G l7 S Tr .�-o r "�-p F'�►C.FP!} .��ti . . . J��---�� . � � � �,j('Fs-- �d^-S��nnt,:1� . � S��aMr/�... /�/S)nlci " ry�-�2 ;: . . �; ' � ' , • , , . .. , , � • EXHIBR . � ;�� . -8-f'r3 � . � . , ' , ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM ' � TO: vIfI.AN RICHMAN-PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: JIM PfARKALUNAS , SUBJECT: ASPEN MUSIC SCHOOL I041 SPECIAL REVIEW � DATE: JUNE 28, 19$3 �� ' �/c-� / !/Ai In accordance with your memo of June 21st concerning the Aspen Music School, it is my understanding that the City Council has agzeed to finance the installation of a water 2ine to the Music School. Therefore, in accordance with the Council's wishes, the Water Department must pxovide this service. Assuming that the County approves the application, the Water Department wi17. attempt to meet fts ob2igation ici this respect. cc: John Doremus - Doremus and Company 1 > . . � 4 � � � \ �- --,—.,,. _-�....._s....,,. ,�.._ . ,.-. __.-----------.__ ----. _------------- - • ---- _ __°. _ ___ _ . , , � • EXHIBIT ' - � . � r . , �-- ASPEIWQPITaGI4V EIVVI�OOVMEN'�'AL HEALTH DEPARTMENT MEMORANrJUt•i ' TO: Alan Richman, Planning Office FRO*t: Thomas S. Aunlop, Dzrector '�� , Environmental Health Department DATE: ' June 23, 1983 RE: Aspen Music School 1041 Snecial Review � ----------------------------------------------------------- This application has been reviewed for the following concerns by this office. , • Air Quality: i No adverse impacts are anticipated in the surrounding neighbor.hood as the result of this nroject. That is, provided dust suppression techni.ques be implemented should wind blown � dust present a problem during construction. Long range dust problems can be controlled by immediate seeding or vegetation of disturbed areas, after construction. i Noise Abatement: i Other than equipment noise being generated during construction of this project no negative long term impacts should be anticipated. If comnlaints are received by this office thc Colorado Noise Abatement statute will govern the investigation. Water Quality: Tae only concern here is disturbance of Castle Creek tahen the line crossing is made. There are standard control procedures which must be i.mplemented by the contractor which will minimize this imnact. The contractor will be responsible for initating these control techniques. In conclusion, it is in the best interest of all students, faculty and staff who use tlie campus facilities to be ahle to depend on a save drinking water supply and sewage disposal system. The health, safety and welfare of these individuals ; ' can be protected by installation of public caater served by the City of Aspen and public sewer served by Asnen Metro Sanitation District as soon as possible. TSD/co 130 South Galena Stroet AB�son, Cotorado B1611 303/925-2020 . , � ` 4 � ...„,,,,�.,,,, _ _ _ _ r. �..�...�.._..._.�.....,..�_.,._..._t ...,.,,._.._ --- ----- ._. ._----- -___ . - -----.. , - � �"��•---- txrt�n�� . : .. � � � � n �T • , ^� _ .. _. _... .... . . . . . . . . . _ __. ...._. .._..__.._� ' _ ....., pitkin county 506 east main street espen, colorado 81611 . ' �M'E M'O'R'A N�D U M - T0: Alan Richman FROM: Ron Thompson �` , DATE: June 22, 1483 RE: Aspen Music Scfiool 1U41 — Special Review . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Attached are the reqnirements of engineering for this project. It may be helpful to have some geological input in this pro3ect as machinery and trenching will be on steep slopes and -many critical water crossings are involved. � � : i y i ' , , ' MEMORANDtJM i.;..::n o� r.o. cc ::;-i;�.^, rz.�r;z;r C�. T•ublic Dc;o EXHIBIT TO: Board of County Commissioners scb3;.et � ub ?'::ti. IIO. � 3 FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office RE: Aspen Racquet Club Special Review and Commercial GMP Exemption - Public Hearing DATE: August 8, 1983 , We have received an application from the Aspen Racquet Club for the redevelopment of their clubhouse and facilities. The site contains _ a total of 4.82 acres, zoned AF-2, and is presently iniproved,with a single family house, a 24,000 square foot tennis "bubble" structure, and the 386 square foot clubhouse. A previous special review approval was granted for expansion of the clubhouse by 5,456 square feet (Resolution No. 79-26) . The square footage of existing and approved improvements total 29.842. . In this application, the applicant seeks approval of a new plan which we believe will be more consistent with the County's Scenic Qua].ity Policy as well as ihe developing goals for the Highway 82 corridor. The applicant proposes to remove the bubble and the existing clubhouse, then to redevelop the facility incorporating all previous approvals including ihe indoor tennis courts under one roof. The existing tennis bubble is 37'� feet high and the redeveloped club house will be considerably lower, within the County's 26' height . limit. The new facility will contain a total of 30,822 square feet devo�ed to the following uses: Expanded Clubhouse 13,622 square feet Tennis Courts 15,800 square feet Solar Gallery 1,400 square feet TOTAL: . ' 30�822 square feet The applieation includes a requesi'for e�;emption from ihe commercial GMP-for a 1,000 square foot expansion. The redeveloped facility calls L-or 980 moze square feet than lias been g"ranted in previous approvals. This square footage will be used in the 1,400 square foot solar gallery entry way. Section 5-510.2(i) establishes ihe pr.ocedure for exemption from the commercial GMP regulation. That section reads as fol7.ows: � ' ".(i} the expansion fo an existing commercial use in a building by not more than one thousand (1,0003 square ieet, er.cluding employee housing, for ihe purposes oP pzoviding a small addition oE space which can be shown to have minimal or manageable impact- upon the community ancl can be justifi.�d by the benefit which will accrue to the community. For expansions which involve not �tiore than two hundred fifty (250) square feet, the expansion shall be approved jointly by the l�lanning Director and the � Cliief AuiJ.ding Inspeci:or. Fox expansions which involvc greater than two hunclre:d iifty i250) but nat more ihan one thousand (1,000) square feet, the expansion sha11 be subject L-o �he special approval oC the Planning and Zaniny Con�mission. The revi.ew of any reque�t ior ihe expansion oE an er.isting commercial use shall include a determination•of mi.nimal oz munagcabJ.e impact on i:}ie community, co�i�ideri.ng but not limited to findings ihat . a minimal amount oi addi.tional parl:ing demand will be crcat•ed or ihaL- par!;i_ng can he aeeorcmiodaL-eci on si�e; that there will be minimal visual impact on the neighbc,rhood due L-o the project; and that mini.mal nc�w demrind i:; plr�c-ed on services available at thc site such as wa�er, sewcr, roacls, drainaqe and fire protection." � __ ___� � 'Memo: Aspen Racquet Club . Page Two August 8, 1983 Since all of the exemption square footage is contained in a solar gallery/entry way, we feel that the applicants contention that there will be no impact whatsoever within the meaning of the above exe�rption is entirely correct. Furthermore, since the solar gallery will provide for the space heating needs of the indoor tennis courts, the proposal is consis- tent with the County's policy to encourage the employment of energy conservation features. . Clubhouses or recreational buildings are allowed by special review ' (Section 3-3.19) provided they are used in conjunction with and accessory to permitted outdoor recreational uses. This particular use in this location was determined to be appropriate in several previous approvals. We believe that the changes in the use which are requested at this time will reduce the adverse impacts and will result in the creation of a club which will be an asset tc� the community. All accessory facilities are intended for the exclusive use of the Club members. These facilities include pool, jacuzzi, clubroom, lounges, locker rooms, pro shop, and exercise room. Food service has been available in the past and' will continue to be available in the clubroom for members only. There is no public restaurant included in this application. , A new landscaping plan has been developed in conjunction with this redevelopment plan. We feel that the new plan is superior to that which was previously apnroved. The plan features a larger lake and land forms 15 feet high separating the facilities from the Higbway, and incorporates the County's bike path. The bike path will be relocated to wind through and over the land forms. Bikers will be able to use the shores of the lake as a rest stop. The land forms will be vegetated with a mix of conifers, cottonwoods, shrubs, native grasses and flowers. Generally, the new club house with its landscaping plan will � result in substantial improvemenis in the scenic quality of this property. The application includes a traffic impact analysis prepared by Design Workshop. Their analysis indicates that the clubhouse is proposed to serve ex.isting outdoor recreational facilities and will not independently generate additional traffi.c. The traffic analysis indicates that the two indoor courts will generate slightly less traffic than the three courts currently in the "bubble." This might result in a slight reduction in traffic generation. Both the County Planning Ofiice and Engineer concur with the conclusions of Design Workshop. The parking lot will be relocated to the rear of the property and will contain 51 parking spaces. The Land Use Co3e requires one space per 400 square feet of non-residential space but provides for a parking reduction by special review for warehouse uses. In this case, the applicant is proposing one space per 400 square feet for the clubhouse space, for a total of 34 spaces, plus 17 extra spaces for a grand total of 51 spaces. Special review • approval for the reduction oi the requirement to 51 spaces is requested on the ba.sis of the similarity between the traffic generation characteristics of warehouses and indoor tennis courts. _ ��W�.�-- ldemo: Aspen Racquet Club Page Three August 8, 1983 In further support of this parking reduction request, the applicant has developed a contingency plan for handling overflow parking needs should such a need develop during special events. Overflow will be handled along the clubhouse drive entry road, by lease on adjacent property, or on the Buttermilk parking lot. These plans were developed through cooperation with the Planning and Engineering �Departments. We therefore recommend special review approval of a reduction in the parking requirement to 51 spaces. The Board of County Commissioners is requested to act on a subdivision exemption for a lot line adjustl►ient resulting in new lot lines ' which follow the footprint of the new facilities proposed. The Board has previously interpreted the Code such that trail ease- ments are not subtracted for density calculations. Therefor.e, the lot line adjustment will have no impact upon development potential and will be consistent with PUD procedures which p�rmit variation of off-street parking spaces, setbacks, and lot widths. A drainage plan has been developed which handles all drainage from impervious surfaces on-site in dry wells and/or retention areas. This plan satisfies the concerns of both the Environmental Health Department and County Engineer. A commitment was made in the process of the original Racquet Club Subdivision Filing No. 1 which runs with the land to grant an easement through this property upon request for alternative access to Park Meadows. That was a voluntary commitment as it was not required by the Land Use Code. The applicant continues to be willing to abide by that commitment. The Aspen Metro Sanitation has reviewed and approved the utility extension plans. Jim Markalunas indicated that an additional easement is necessary in order to achieve looped service. The additional easement was requested in or along the curbed access road between "Stage Road to a point easter.ly at the new parking lot." Looped service is a policy adopted by the Water Department to achieve service reliability. The information in this paragraph represents a clarification of Markalunas' comments which the Planning Commissicn did not have the benefit of at the time they reviewed this application. Nonetheless, the additional easement requested should be dedicated as a condition of approval. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendati.on The Commission reviewed this application at their regular meeting on July 5, 1983 and recommended approval of the special review subject to two conditions: 1. The landscaping plan shall be fully implemented prior to the issuance of a "certificate of occupancy." 2. Parking shall be prohibited within public easements and • right-of-ways. Planning Office Comments and Recommendation Two additional conditions appear appropriate at this time. First, we should add a condition requiring the dedication of the easement requested by the Water Department. �� _. _____. . � .�lemo: Aspen Racquet Club Page Four ' August 8, 1983 Second, it should be made clear that the accessory facilities and particularly the restaurant are for the exclusive use of club members. Therefore we sugyest two additional conditions to be . attached to the special review and subdivision exemption: 3. The applicant shall dedicate a water line easement along � the access road between Stage Road and the eastern property line adequate to achieve looped water service in the area. 4. Al1 accessory facilities including pool, jacuzzi, club • room/food service, lounges, locker rooms, pro shop and exercise room shall be for the exclusive use of club members and will not be available to the general public. � . 4 . . . • ' ".""__......_.... ........._............ _ ___-_-__ __ _ �++�. . . _.. _ ...�.- _,._...._...sy..,......._..._. .__.._.. ._ ........,.�..��.`__.:_____-.---._—,.�------ --.__- .��.,,.T__:r...� .. . ......_ _ .. _ ._ �-s_.�..�..�<. _<_� __�__ . yonr,n or co. co:.;:.c�;�;; PzTxirr co. Publio . Dato EXHIBIT � �— Sub�oc � INDEX TO Fx-�1. No SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION FOR ASPEN RACQUET CLUB CLUBHOUSE EXPANSION AMENDMENT EXHIBITS 1 Application Form � 2 Special Review Appioval Resolution No. 79-26 � . � 3 Traffic Analysis : � i MAPPING (Figures) � 1 Rendering 2 Existing Conditions 3 Site Plan 4 Landscaping Plan/Drainage 5 Floor �Ian for Clubhouse 6 Cross Section Visual Elevations I ASPEN RACQUET CLUB CLUBHOUSE - SPECIAL REVIEW PROJECT SUMMARY Project Descri tion The Applicant proposes to construct a clubhouse to provide facilities accessory to the existing tennis club activities. A previous special review approval was granted by Resolution 79-26 for the construction of approximately 5,500 square feet of clubhouse space together with three additional tennis courts and a swimming pool. The current proposal is for an amendment to the previously granted special review approval in order to expand the size of the clubhouse. Substantial community benefits will accrue through approval of this proposal by the elimination of the "bubble" structure located on the property and by the enhancement of the amenities of the proposed clubhouse to provide a first class private tennis club for both members of the community and visitors. The attached mapping found at Figures 1 through 6 includes an artist' s rendering (Fig. 1) , e�isting conditions map (Fig. 2) , site plan - including utility, road/access and parking plan (Fig. 3) , landscaping plan including drainage information (Fig. 4) , floor plan for clubhouse (Fig. 5) and cross section visual elevations incorporating removal of the "bubble" structure and i installation of landsca in ursuant to landsca ' p 9 p ping plan (Fig. � 6) . The effect of the new clubhouse and removal of the "bubble" structure will represent a dramatic improvement in the visual � appearance of the Highway 82 corridor leading into Aspen. Open space is preserved and extensive landscaping is provided to beautify the area. I The project complies with current County goals, policies and regulations. The proposed reconstruction includes the clubhouse, attached tennis building housing two tennis courts and a solar � gallery to provide an energy efficient heating system as part of the entryway to the clubhouse. The existing tennis "bubble" � str.ucture and the eaisting clubhouse will be removed. The existing clubhouse special review approval will be fully utilized and the Applicant requests a 1 ,000 square foot allotment exempt from the Commercial Growth Management Plan quota system pursuant to Section 5-510.2 (i) . The square footages involved in the proposed reconstruction relative to the existing facilities and approvals are as follows: Existing Facilities Tennis "bubble" structure 24,000 square feet ' Present clubhouse 386 square feet Existing clubhouse approval (Resolution 79-26) 5,456 square feet i 1,000 square foot exempt allotment 1 ,000 square feet Total 30,822 square feet Proposed Reconstruction Eapanded clubhouse 13,622 square feet Tennis building 15,8Q0 square feet Solar gall�ry 1 ,400 square feet Total 3d,822 square feet Pursuant to the preapplication conference held March 10, 1983, the following specific areas of compliance are described: SCENIC QUALITY • The artist's rendering attached at Fig. 1 shows a b�autifully designed and energy efficient clubhouse and tennis building. The lower floor of the structure which contains locker rooms, steam and sauna areas and an exercise room is situated approximately ten feet below existing grade. Ext�nsive landscaping shown on Fig. 1 and on the landscaping plan attached at Fig. 4 together �aith walkways, decks and the free form pond significantly enhance and beautify the site. A cross section � visual elevation attached at Fig. 6 shows view lines from several points along Highway 82 with the "bubble" structure compared to ' the same view lines with the proposed landscaping plan and the new clubhouse and tennis building. The lower profile of the proposed new structure and landscaping of the site will definitely be an improvement over the present conditions. The Applicant will relocate the existing parking lot to �he rear of the property and close off the Highway 82 access point. This area will be replanted and landscaped to further enhance the feeling of open space and cr?ate an overall improvement in scenic quality. These changes in the present site will obscure from � v�ew the road access areas and parking areas of the facility and ! significantly reduce the visual effec�. of the proposed clubhouse � � and tennis building. EXTENSION OF UTILITIES - WATER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL j i All utilities are available ta the site and certain main extensions and improvements have already been undertaken as a ' result of previous subdivision approvals for the Aspen Racquet ' Club Subdivision Filing No. l, The site plan attached at Fig. 3 includes the utility plan. Power is available from Holy Cross Electric Company, water is available from the City of Aspen water I supply and sewer is available from the Aspen Aietro Sanitation � � -2- 4 � i . I �l• :,.---- A��cudi.x U � � , 1��`J I , ' -.::; I'Lxl:ItJ CaUNTY L.II�D USL•'• Al'l'LICAT1pN FOtUI • ' r� ' .• ' • • ' • • ' ' • ' �, � . . su��av,rcY or rr�n��:c.ti ri�:�il1JfiF:D t�Y ur.•:vTeri FIIASE � . . . . • . �� • 17ir.cc�ion�; Any apZ�licar.t Eor a devclopment rcquiring a per.nit undcr ' t}�i:. codc shali 2,c rc�ponsible for showing con[ormancc with any app�icable , •'poli.cies' of Sec�io:► 2 a� listed below. . The app�icant stiall submit l•ttose �� • Xequir.ements t�ecc:�a�y to shoa coiifornance witti the�e policies and the • Xe��ited gencra2 rcgulations of 5ec�ion S. ' Upon sub:nission oL thc a�plica- ' �ion and all sirnmis�?on content�, thc ?lanning O£ficc stiall distributc � �, ' �vne Lo appropri.itc rcicrra� agcncics which stizll indioatc xts certi.tica- " tion or aon--certi�icat•ion oE the prot�osal as being in con£or:aance with poli.cics and .as �atisfying 'submission requires��nts ��nd review guidelines of xeleva�it genera.l regulations. Referr��l agencies shall also indic��te �.:: �nc�thez furthcr study in a later revicw phzse is requircd atid any further � Xcco:�mendations or coriditians, attach;n� cortunentis and re�utning sa^�e to � -� . .. t)�e Planning Office_ � • ' • • �.' ' . �� • OCAL fiEVl�ld- C��TIFIC:�TIO`i �CONDITIC::S �-, , 1 S�.'UDY Ii�QUIRED POLICY FACTOR L�G STAF'F �YES ►IQ �AND' ��: ' •--• .. • Zt�IZTI!►I.S DATE F:.ECO!•;:•Sr:i+7A-- �--- • � . , . .. . " . ' • • TIONS . . . . • ' � • • . • �`~i • • v r • �5.. 1'A GS DS .Fr* t�ot a.nconsistant Plannin� , ' ' - , . �ri_th 1•Sastcr Plar Of f ice ' ' � • ' .-- --- — .— fi.s tc o f G r o w t h • ' ` . � • 2. .� _.- � �. 2lazard 6 Resourc � . Planning . � . . '� . �~:: �. � . . • l�reas of-ficc • , , . � . . � .� , • •,. ' � GcoloFic , 7; . . � . . .. • � jtaxards , ' . . . ' �' ' . � Floodpl.ains � . ' , - , � ' , . Ra.parian ' ' • '^-- • . . • /lreas • , ' - • ��=. -• •• . . ' . «ildlifc . • ' ' . ' ' � • • ' I,*�ld�ire • , � • r4�di.ation • b, ' Soils/�rosion Coun�y Ex- . . . . . ' • . ' - r .L'cnsion . . � • � n�cnt• • ' •� ' • • . �� . • r ! � t�" ' ,3. . � Extractablc Flnnning � ' `� `- �� `�� ' ILL`SOUICCS OLt�CC • '� ' . i• • � ' • • � 2lincral , � , . ' ; Vec;eta��c �. � , ' ' ' _ � ` Oki�cr , • � : � � � �' � • . . .,uLr.t�.JJlon � � lA �� itc--API>li.c.:cic+n • US � Uctai�cJ � ' CS �� Ccncral Su�missJ.oci FP � k'.inal 1'2.1�. . • . . � ,' . � ' ' � �J� . � • � � � �� t'„ . • .• , .• • • ' • ... - • � ''?inj�endtx n , ' '• ��I'`' �� •� I'I7't:IN C011;�TY l.At�D USL AI'PLICATION F'Ol�f . � , : . . . . . . � • ' . , ' � . . STUUY F�F:QUIItCD POLICY FACTOR I.00AL }�EVIEIJ- CERTIFICATION Cn�DI7'IONS ' , ING STAFF YES �O �� ' � � .. ' � INXTIALS DAT� �CQ`4�lE:�DA- • . ' TIONS �e. �'A CS DS FP A�ricultuzal , Flanning � • • Conscrvati.on Office • s' ._... .._. ..._ ..._._ • . • . . . . . . � . . . • . � ' • • . ' S. � �� w Sceaic Planning • . • , � , • Quality Office , � • � , , , ` 6. �' • T•Tat-er� Supply Environ- . � ' � '� . � ,� "'- . " , mental . _ , . - . , liealth . ' ' . i . . . , ' 7. � ` ^ r Sewa�e Dis- Environ- • . f . • . . posal rnental ' � Hcal[h � • , . � � . . . , � � . . . : . . . � . . � . � 8. � • • •I�oisc £nviron- • . � � � � � � mental � ' . ' • . . . Itcaltt� . . . . . . . , .� i ' . 9. . 'lti.r Quality Environ- � •, • , � `- ^ V . mental , • . . i . • ticalth ' ! . . ' • � ' � . . • . � �.Q. . s1li.�toric/ llistorical , i � � � . • Archacolo�ic:►1 Socicty . � � ' • Ttcsources ' . - � ' � � � •� . � • I � • , . • ' - ' , • . . . J . , ; . • • i � • . � . , • . - � , , . . . . . . i , , , . . , • � . i - . • I • r • 1• � . .,.v=.. ..,--•--.._ , :; . � . � • • • , , . , . . • . , , , � • • • . . . � . . . . � , , . � • � . �r��,diX n • . . • • . , �. . • tit:lli COUt�TY LAtiD USE AT'CLICA'IION FQIL`i • STUDY'�t:EQUIhF.b L'C:LxC� FACTOR I.00AL RT:VILW- CF.f:TZrIC/�TiON CO;:UITIUNS • . . � . � IttC STAPF YES NO AND � . ' • ItJITIAL llATE I:ECO:t�,E,7�A- , . , . . • � ' , 7'TONS � I'/► GS DS FP.� ' .� � �--- • r � � w ^ _,_„ � E�.-Lcnsxon of ' Rocl:y rft." • t--('�� >� , �, � , rzL'iJ.�t�es, • • Natur�l Gas . . � , � .. . • tz�ter and Aspen/ltoly • �/�� j scuer Cro�s Fleetric � • . - 'rioUrc3�.n �e�i • ' . � • � • Munf cipa3. idater , � . • • • � • & Sca.*er Di.s t.s , � ' 'Pt�blic shops, County � ' . � • • � . • . ' • • . � �ara�es, yards �'Sana�er • , . . . . . • . . . . � ;t . ' • �ecreation Sites City F.ecreation ; • . u � Direceor • ' �� . General Tax Cost/ County Finance � • � • . • , �enefi.t Officcr ' ' • . 15. � � � �' .ConCribution to flousing iva ! JG�f' • • . IIousiug Stock Coordinator _ '0�� ^ ' . . # IG. � 1i.w-made liazards/ Huildi.ng . . . ' ' • ' Salcty Officia� _ . .y 17. � .___ ._,_ _____ _.._ . j�Ti_I a I i f c co 10.n iv. o F � . • • Pieservation Sdildli�e . � . . . �8• �,. ._ ,___ � 1=a.ar�}► 33uilding � � • . _ , fonscrvation Otficia� ' � � ' . � _ . . . • , . • , • . 14• � ,r ,� �. . 47ater t:esource� Districc' FTater .. . XmpaCt, Cpurt . . , . , • • . 24• ._._ ._._ ...._. Fi.n�l. P�st . Couiity FnFlnccr� ' . , 'Contents �,LCorncy,I'7.�ii- � .• • . . . rtin� Of.Li cc � . , . , , ' Itcr.:urJc�l :�C 4:U(J I'.Pf. 1��•h ZR, 1'177 Lur�•LL:� iS:inncr Itccordcr Ito��rptlun N� `'•• . � . EX�HrIB,IT �x��rr � y � ,{�7"t'AdfiN�4.Nr � i11•' :`!iE II7ARD Or COUNTY COMMISSIO r.:: :�-^;•i�; rpUN'^1, COLORADO, GRANTING SPECIAL REVIEW • P.FL�ROVAL I'OR THE EXPAI�SIO?�I OF THE ASPEN RAC�UET CLL1B • Resolution 79 �� ' WHEREAS, owners of the Aspen Racquet Club ("Applicant") have made aQpiication for special review approval (for the improvement and expansion of the Club) pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.06.03 b. of the Pitkin County Land Use Code, and WHEREAS, the application includes a request to construct . a new clubhouse to include the following uses (with the noted square footage devoted tc each) : Proposed Usa Square Footage Pro-Shop 896 rontrol 320 Tennis Clinic (audio visual) 288 , Snack bar 192 Storage 160 Lounge/Clubroom • 784 Ladies Locker Room 384 Men's Locker Room 640 Steam and Sauna 256 Entry and Circulation 576 � AdministraLion (of=ice) 3�� Viewing Area � 576 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 5,456 as well as to construct three new tennis courts, and a small (800 sq. ft.) residential size swimming pool, and WHEREAS, the Pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission has recommended approval of the application at its meetinq held , on December 20, 1978, and WHEREAS, the Board is willing to adopt this recommendation, subject to the condition hereinafter specified, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE50LVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, that it does hereby grant special review approval to the Aspen Racquet Club for the improvenents and uses hereinabove described conditioned as follows: Lo�r,n or co. co:.::.;-r,�s riTxirr co. � Publio Hearin�•i_-?�i;.ita Date : �....__,.., .................. Sub,�cet : Fr�i. No.: . • �.� . � '' . - � -- . . ' Q�f3Gi9k3f. .. ' --f r. .. � l. The Applicant shall close its present access tc Highway 82 and replace it with an access from the - � Owl Creek Road at the northerly edge of the Aspen ' Racquet Club Property. • 2. The Applicant shall relocate its present parking . ------ _ ---- ----:---•-------••-_--- --- ----- — -- ---_.-- -------- — ------.------ --- --------- '° lot to the rear of the property in conjunction with � , the relocation of the access road. The existing � lot area shall be bermed and revegetated (including - _ - - . . _-�----- --- - ----- -------- -� - trees) to screen the facility, all as shown on the - � '. � . ':- grading plans submitted as figure 3 on the application (to be approved by the County Extension Agent) . _ . 3. The Applicant shall provide necessary fill for the .. , - proposed turnout lane at the intersection of Owl Creek Road and Highway 82. . 4. The Applicant shall convey to Pitkin County (for the use of Park Meadows) a perpetual in gross easement (£or roadway purposes) , to be used when and if Park Meadows shall be required (or shall elect) to terminate �he use � of its access from Highway 82. .The exact location of ' the easement shall be determined by the Applicant (subject to the approval of the County Engineer) taking into consideration the Applicants present and future improve- ments and uses on the site and so as to result in the laast impacts thereon; provided that the final alignment shall be usable and adequate to meet the reasonable needs of Park Meadows. Provided, further, that nothing herein shall be construed to require the App2icant to contribute ' to the cost of constructi.on of any roadway placed within the easement. • ' .. 2 _ . � . _� � - � � � � .��36� �.� � �$ � . � Approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin , • County, Colorado, at its regular meeting on February 26, 1979. '. • � EOARD OF COULdTY COMMISSIONERS .., ' �'�`'�' PITY.IN COUNTY, COLORADO ,. . _ . . . . . .• =�.1�4�TFsS-T,. '. . � . �; �� .. t. - " ._..:'- �...i .y - - � � �v.•�r ' "'�x. r5-I"' '_. : --_.:_ . __:�.�.C.` . -_ �.r'_"' _ :.1"_" ��._ _"-___ .—.._'-_ r'�' ;,`.:> .1'�''7'� BY= �:'Y_1�:�1 /��L:7.�,..,� :�' � .� },,r'.y��1�•�[./f �Joseph.�'. Edwards, Jr. '�•:';��E•l.izab`—etM: 6tewart ��irman • . � ': ' ' Aeputy :Gounty Clerk .... .... ......_._ . •!:.•._ . _ - -- - • r-- ... ....._. ...__ . � .- - - -- - • �- i,f '.: ,. . . � . - ... . . _. :,� . .:r"2 .4 ' . . . . . . . . � . • i . � . . . . �� . . . � ' � • ' . . . . ._ : _ _... .. .... �. . _ . . .. � '�. "APPROVED AS TO FORM: . . . . - - • - : ,��G-raf�-rz�4�{��/.� .� . . . . � Sandra M. Stuller � � County Attorney �. "��'-��6T� ; EX�IT � 1Mlr'/tG1�1114�t�L March 21 , 1983 ' � des(gn workshop, inc. - 710 e.durant *TRAFFIC ANALYSIS aspen,colorado 81611 PROPOSED EXPANSION 303/925-8354 ASPEN RACQUET CLUB The figures generated for this traffic analysis were developed using the following assumptions: 1 . The average daily occupancy for the new tennis courts will be 50 percent. This figure is based on historic records. 2. Peak hour occupancy of the new tennis courts will be 100 percent. 3. The indoor courts will be in operation from 8: 00 A.M. until 10: 00 P.M. - 14 Hours. 4. The two indoor courts will generate slightly less traffic than the three courts currently in the bubble. 5. The courts will be used for singles play 70 percent of the time and for doubles play 30 percent of the time. 6. No traffic will be generated by the clubhouse as it serves only players. Two scenarios have been developed to arrive at the average daily • traffic generated by the additional facilities and the parking that will be required. Scenario A - This proposition assumes the worst conditions and is based on the assurnption that 100 percent of the new court users will arrive by private automobile at a ratio of one person per car. At this rate, the new facilities would Qen- erate 110 trips per day or 55 cars with a peak hour trip generation of 16 trips or eight cars. Under these condi- tions, 16 additional parking spaces will be required. Scenario B - This proposition assumes 90 percent of the new court users will arrive by car with 1 . 5 persons per car, producing averge daily traffic of 66 trips per day or 33 cars per day with peak hour �raffic at 10 trips or five cars per hour and demand for 10 additional parking spaces. With either scenario, the impact on Highway 82 and the additional parking requirements are minimal indeed and contribute very lit- tle additional peak hour traffic. Additionally, traffic impact community development land planning landscape architecture � . � �,_��..�.. will be further reduced during the summer due to the shortened play period enciing at 8:00 P.M. for the outdoor court. *Calculations prepared by Alan M. Voorhees & Associates, Trans- portation Planners, Denver, Colorado. Yours truly, , Don H. Ensign, rincipal Design Workshop, Inc. /mp � i , � ( l ; . i ; i � i EXHiBIT � � , _ _. -,. 3 �`� ;:.�..�.�� __. �� , ..::::> ;: ._.....8..8.83. z.i,:,�,.:::; ; ASPEN RAC P.O. Box 2294 •-- ---.� . QUET CLUS Aspen, CO 81612 August 8� i983 Pitkia County Commissioners 506 Ea.st Main Aspen, Colorado SUBJECT: The Aspen Racquet CZub My tracts of land on Highway 82 and Owl Creek Road xill be af£ected by the development of the Aspen Racquet Club. My concern is tha.t the additional traffic on Owl Creek Road (an unpaved roadway) will cause dust and sound polution. I feel that the County Roa�i (Oxl Creek) should be hard surfaced as one of the requirements for granting the zoning for the Aspen Racquet Club development. Vexy truly yours, �� .�..��.��J E. . Obermeyer -�,_ �.�.��... . ___ _. . _ _ _ __ .�.�.,,� � .� ��,....,...��.Y..�_ r.:.� .� c � :. : MEMORANDUM r • --•� r�`'' EXHIBIT �•:.;o TO: Board of County Commissioners �LU3 � � 2'_:2i. FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office - RE: Expansion of Sundeck Restaurant - Commercial GMP Exemption and Special Review - Public Hearing DATE: August 8, 1983 We have received an application from the Aspen Skiing Corporation for special review and for exemption from the commercial GMP for the expansion of 1,000 square feet of their existing deck at the � Sundeck Restaurant on Aspen Mountain. Section 5-510.2(i) provides for exemption from the commercial GMP for expansions of existing commercial buildings by not more than 1,000 square feet when the impacts are found to be minimal or manageable. That section in its entirety reads as follows: " (i) the expansion of an existing commercial use in a building by not more than one thousand (1,000) square feet, excluding employee housing, for the purposes of groviding a small addition of space which can be shown to have minimal or manageable impact upon the community and can be justified by the benefit which will accrue to the community. For expansions which involve not more than two hundred fifty (250) square feet, the expansion shall be approved jointly by the Planning Director and the Chief Building Inspector. For expansions which involve greater than two hundred fifty (250) but not more than one thousand (1,000) square feet, the expansion shall be subject to the special approvaZ of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The review of any request for the expansion of an existing commercial use shall include a determination of minimal or manageable impact on the community, considering but not limited to findings that a minimal number of additional employees will be generated by the expansion or the applicant will provide additional employee housing; that a minimal amount of additional parking demand will be created or that parking can be accommo3ated on site; that ihere will be minimal visual impact on the neighborhood due to the project; and that minimal new demand is placed on services available at the site such as water, sewer, roads, drainage and fire protection." "Ski lifts and necessary related facilities" are permitted by special review in the AF-1 zone district. Any expansion of related facilities such as the Sundeck Restaurant expansion proposed in this application requir�s additionnl special review approval. This application does not propose expansion of production facilities (i.e. , kitchen space) . Instead, it proposes enclosure of space which has historically served as seating space oz the outdoor deck. In addition to the request made in the application, it has come to our attention that the applicant has also filed plans for an additional 1,200 square feet of deck space to be constructed L-o replace the deck which is being enclosed. We have discussed ihe enclosure of 1,000 square feet of deck space and the construction the additional replacement deck space with • the Ilousing Ofiice and have concluded that the impact upon employee ' housing of both actions will be minimal. The bottom line is a 1,000 square foot increase in interior seating capacity and approximately 200 square feet of additional outdoor seating capacity. Any of you who are tamiliar with the winter operation of this restaurant will know that there is currently an overcrowded seating situaiion. i Memo: �xpansion of Sundeck Page Two . August 8, 1983 � The restaurant has more production than seating capacity. The only direct impact expansion of seating capacity is likely to have in this case would be the need for an additional "busboy." Neither the Housing Office nor the Planning Office believe that this expansion will generate a need for more than one additional employee and possibly none. ACCOrding to the Environmental Health Department, some modification to the on-site wastewater disposal system might be necessary because the County's disposal regulation only considers enclosed space. The disposal capacity requirement is a direct function of ' the indoor seating capacity. The Planning Office concludes that the impacts from this expansion will be "minimal or manageable", consistent with the requirements of Section 5-510.2(i) and recommends approval of the special review and the commercial GMP exemption request noting that the applicant will be required to meet both the Colorado Food Regulation and the Pitkin County Individual Sewage Disposal regulations. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Commission reviewed this application at their regular meeting . on July 5, 1983 and granted approval of the exemption from commercial GMP and recommended your approval of the special review without condition. The Commission was aware of the plans to replace the outdoor deck space and considered the exemption from commercial GMP to be appropriate. � � � ' . ' i'� r'0. C.i.:..i'u .� � . • • �^T':-�ii1 C0. � � ' � . , , . EXHIBIT . . . _._ _.._- ---. ._._...-- -. . _ . .. _ ._. . . ---___. .. . _. . �_. . _ ._. ..�;: .•' . - �-�3 i � nrrr:i+��ix u • r . , • .�� '. 1�.r��.��y.h . • � + ��!,bi t�:i V V�L`I b lr 1'liOJ1iCT �UM1)Iil't � • .ft�\ 5ecL-io��/CUr.ccl . +c.��;: • ''•'�•"�� .n�•tu u::g nt�t�L1CA1IO;a r•oc:r•t Dnxr•. sunriz�i��n .wv(" , — ,•TO J!!i CU::1'J�L•'TEU IIY hl']'LICANT: , . , � . � . Nn�.��; Peter Birfelder for Aspen Skiing Co.�, Represented'by Wayne Blanke � Aut�iu:ss P.O. Box i248 Aspen. CO 81612 , • • � � � � � . rt�otis 925-1220 . - . . , ara:L or rROJi;rr Addition to Sundeck Restaurant,,Aspen Mountain • � r�zoariCT LOCI�TION: � . �` (On al•l•ached shect, Iocat•e on •r.oning c;tip, showi.ng kx�undari.es �? � of uny »atural hazard and resourcc arcas, any o�her spc:cial • . ' regul:�l•or.y clistricts, Section 5, Land Use Code; and ].ocal•e _ . � . _ ' on :�ppr.opriate CSU/L•'AA t•laps ar.y arcas not• covezed �y Che � . a}x�ve.) . ' . i� . . +: . . . i: �irn�t►i nw:n 6,000 sq.f'eet. :Flousing'642 sq.feet. Storage 490 sq•. feet. �� . �: �r.xs�•r.r:c�usL(s) Seating for restaurant 3,632 sq. feet, bathrooms 427 sq. feet,� '�: ' ' • :. , �. . � - � . kitchen SQ9 sq. feet, • ' i . � . �; rnos�s�:� us�(s)' Seating for restaurant indoors � • � (uPProii.r�eCe sgLare • . ' � footage i'or cach) 1,000 sq. feet ekpansion� • ' ' � i: . . : • . . • �, • ' 1�1LSL•'A2T ?.Oii1t:G Or^ SI'lF A7-1 • • � � • � • �� • r r. nssci:ir;zort or L*�Nn USI: PI:GI�OSAL � � . � , L: . , � . , }� • � • ' ' • � . . +` :i . f . ' 7�0 �r•. ca•tirr,Lx�r, Ur ri�r•. P1,ta�?air�c or•r•xcs • , ' • � ; Trrr or• nr�Lzcni�rota: rs:zo.�i»c : sor3n�.vzsio*� � r.u.n. t:x�lat•r=on . � � � X Sl'7:C1'AL Iti.VIl:I•1 8� 35-acrc i• SUEUY'17::J.C:t . � u 13U7LDJ1iG 1'�P.91T A,1.:�rLt•� . k • } • t�svxr�y� i>unsr•.: rr.��-:�r��r�T.CA':ro,a 5 5/83 nni•� co►•�i�r.r•:ri:n C+Titil•:IJ�L :Uil?li;iiIOli 1'.C. )�1.:7':COI7 U119: . 4 . _.__ t • �T3UA1�) l:("J'7C)!d 1)A7'L•: � UJ:17�J.Idi!) SI114•17:i�4YC)1� _ ' _ 1�.C. AC'1'7():7 ~ —��_ I)!i%: • �, � � �Sonru, �,c.rxo;�i nnrr•, f ' ; 1••xnnl. 1�r.A�r ---- ).+oht;u At;TIOP1 ` nn�rL•' . i , . . . . ' 1 � . . � . � : . . . , ' --. _ ----- ----- � _. _. ._._.. ._. .._-------._. ..�.. _. - / .. _.�--------�-��--- -�-- ---...._ ....._.__. . ,_ . � /� , , Request for special approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission, Grotivth Management. 1. The impact on the community should be negligible as the restaurant isn't in town but on top of Aspen Mountain. The project wouldn't generate more slciers but would instead improve existing services, by providing a ' pleasant area to dine or warm up. . The proposed addition is being designed to utilize the positive aspects of the existing building while increasing the seating in a more efficient manner. . 2. No new employees would be necessary as the restaurant is a cafeteria operation and the addition just generates seating and would not need more employees. The kitchen and line are not being changed to muke more employees necessary. The extra cleanup and table bussing can be handled by the persons now doing the existing restaurant. Without more room in the work areas, }ritchen nnd line, there is not room for more employees. 3. No additional parking would be necessary for new employees. The Aspen Skiing Company provides parking for its employees and also restaurant employees. 4. The proposed addition is on the west side of the Sundeck. This side of the restaurant is almost invisible from summer jeep traffic or �vinter skier traffic. The existing deck is almost 25 years old and is in need of extensive repairs, this along with the fact that prevailing winds make the existing deck unusaUle much of the ski season. The changes in the deck with the new building to shelter it will make it much more usable. 5. There will be no demnnds made on city water, sewer and roads. The Aspen Slding Company provides water from their otivn �vells. The restaurnnt has its own sewer tanks which are cleaned yearly. No new toilets will be involved. The roads are not involved since they are used for summer jeep traffic. 6. There are two housing units in the existing restaurant. These are used for Sundeck employees in the winter. � � � � . • � . � � � . . pitkin county community center O'100 lone pine road r�:::�;L� c�;�� r.o. ,.; aspen, colc,rado 81611 r:rTl.I;i cc_ 303-J25-6C10 z��z�.� T nut o EXHIBIT Sub3;,c � � CENTER � MGMO . F�r,, iao -_ . 3 � T4: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS j FROM: MARIE MACTAVISH, DIRECTOR OF HUM N SERVICES ; SUBJECT: ORDINANCE TO ENABLE THE CONVEYANCE OF PART OF � TH� COMMUNITY CENTER SITE FOR THE SENIOR HOUSING � PROJECT f DATE: AUGUST 3, 1983 ' It is my understanding that on Monday, August 8, 1983 there i will be a public hearing regarding the donation of part of the Community Center land for •Che proposed Senior Housing � Project . The Care Center Committee will be asking for final � approval on the donation of the land . The BOCC's condtion- ; al approval will allow the Care Center Committee to secure financing for the project . There are unresolved issues between Che Oden 's and the Care ; Center Committee . The Oden 's apparently agreed to pay for � a redesign sketch of the proposed project that would address i some areas of concern. It .is .not clear whether this redesign efforC Taill eliminate the confliCt and possible threats of 4 litigation. � From the County's perspective it should be expected that Che I, Care Center Committee will make a decision whether the re- ; design is acceptable to them. If the plans have changed, they j need to be resubmitted to the County Planning Office . i As Human Service Director, I would like to discuss the as- sumptions the Care Center Committee are making regarding, tne CommuniCy Center . Examples of areas for future discussion i are the use of the patio space, food service, program space, ' and program staff, etc. '. I recommend BOCC ' s conditional approval. This will a11ow the Care Center Committee a better chance to secure financing of the project : The "conditional" clause still provide . an op- ; porCuniCy for the County to be a part of the development pro- : , � cess. i � i , EXHIBIT � . - 3 , . . . �iJ� 1 t�G o v►� w►ey"t� . � '1'C" K; � C�ovh-�� . . . . . ' . . . �O»� wl r SS i v v��rrs � /�/l�c_�t� v?� . . ' . • . . ��-i.c� w5`� �� t�� (1 . .�� TL ��-C..i ��.1✓1 ��✓"Wi t�. .�O v- �- !-�"O[.�S E �.'t' -�G�� h,�-�-��e �� .��- G�P �ou,� � f� � � - . W o u. �a� � o w �- � �o u.9� �- �2.o u 5 c� `�o ro� b u� �-�- �eX-�' �o � �r��Ci n loT" � �lZa v�0ov� . 'h.�.�C� ? :�ro.b a� �-E- ,; ��- `��e Couv�.� � c'�i � �S � /� � � . . 1 h:G� �-c.d-� n� �i}�OC.0 c�s co W! !M.i ss�o ri e v�� C7'e : �l0 c.lJE-P� �. a . "��'''' ►Wl� l'a v�. � ��l.t_c'�.�i a l'� �-� d ✓L °1..� � � -�lnp mos�- 5c��►�� s:�o-�s e�s�- o.� �s��n � Jt,�s''r Lc��t��r� ..�vl o�e�c�vi c�P�t c� P�4 5 s 5"�'�.r�-s � V`i s� J � 11s'�- LJ�rLe,v-� '��/l.�v�� a s a �v-� ,� � . � V��P�.v-. o.G -�-�i Le- v��f(L� � j t.(_s '� l,v L i�°.v-� ��✓i r�✓`e G ts j � .o� c t4 v►� P��-s . d r i r.r c� �v�-�o -�/2� . co �v�.-� `s � _ . . ; lar �-� c�►�►-�t� ,�o�.�.N dt ' u s -� ��e.�e ��ln� ubI ;c � '�,� e � : �LZ4s .�1.�dL �c` c-�..s.s �t ��Le o hoC s ��G( h��-� Y- 1.�VLGr °t_ -1,v!-G �2ri vi �o ��! �al ��"� �Cu �'�' � f . . _ ��u e�^s � o i.r� �-' �u s`�-- c vz o►�e_ �2e C�-- a.F'- 'a.. _ �o N��i c u o�.c s ��`-'�o-,�- .^ '�f'- - �o�.c.�-�-� . �!L'�- � _ , ra✓L't-�� - cY'�v�i�-vlc e . �ow � ��c.�c.( `GO 1�LC c � o�.. � �a t-LS � v�2 � SLV�� O Cl. � �✓l d � � (�.e s� �U►��.P � �- �� -��,�+..� � � . � h.��o w� � �S�7C�fit ��4 r�L. C`�!/�C. �[�� -Gv`E? Yl�t/LtG��'tZ 33 0l i a� 1.c1��G�/L. '��e S �E i S �. �c3 r`�' �G�/L�v�P c�-� � . w }9 S �,� �`n c �a v- �i 5 i=(.d «S� �t9-�w . l `� � �eo�. �� .�c� � � v- Co-��. ��cre�. wov�s�� e � c�v� be (ves-� �a�s� ��L � 5 -�- w�.�s-�-�.k.�, � o�- o�-�-e v< <�� o �a� o�. uJ�,o s e �o�(e � � � � � � . y,.,c, �O.✓�--��s �� oC �j�.e,a.v�s c: i-�- r.v�.s Go n s�.��eM-�2d � -�v 5 v►�►�a t ( ,.�o�-- -�'ve-N�o u-s co c2 S��e r a��aa�. �-c l o c� 1c c`'�--� �� " . . � �Yi.h � vt. s o,� w a v�!� -�� ._ ov� -�'�le- 41.o �.cse , �-�S ��I� ��mo5� 6�oc.(�s -�,Gic� vb�o{ i✓?-�o ��-��c w�`� , ��o lc a-�'- `�'�t e o��G��.{ .b �ass c�� b��e1� o v-��v- �. , 'a� "e�T- �'v�o»�.. `f'�t � 1^�'3.d1 � � '�. GE�5 t� GI c'7`1'i o✓1 O `c�2 .ST�-r� � (il� S � � vr2S't� ��.cacn • rDG'tW@P�1 � -�zs� �� -,�o� -{-�iL� �� vi,w a �- V2 v �.c.S� i 5 F�� -�v �o� Y��`c � �' :. -�-� ��2� c�v2�v�. Goc��s V`P c.C.i i`e d- 1 D O o o`-� S�"��7 c� � �r o�� '�i't� . )� "��v-�� . � Y2�c�C S� V1-o`�-- O dl� �C:� ��'�'S v Lt� '�1� � o S� � "��►�. . S�-��Y��,1�.. V`ui.L'Q 5 _ �p�-t'�-'�-8-�S� c�o�s � �� N_a.�i v► �.t� ,a- ' � � U/l.v 5-� d�l9'�� :.�.S � ��O YL o 2�-�o t,CS ��-e � . a� Yv�.�e �. wi.�s�a-�� ,� � .X . �av-e . _ °�� -�..�ke� . o. o o k �-�- ��.�- �s�f�.t�� m - �a� ��c��- ��5 ��S � -.� �� r�; . � -,� w � t t b e- �.o �►�-- � t L� � �o u,,� Wtoh v��►�f _ "G o `�1,� � `�c.� O-� �2 1 i r t�1�e S 5 �<vl� C O v l 5i S�C C'�1 c y . . : �✓1 �ro uT� C o v►'�r o � i . . (! U✓t.. �e ss y o� ��-��e. �►� w�e.ot� �� c�� o vl, --��e.. (l)o�.c s eQ Lc��l t b� . -�u� !-�' t0�-�'o�e _ �dt c� 1 � �1�2 C S C�✓L b °�-- � °c_�-r� • � VL'�U°� 'Z_S (��C�- j,JVL�.. O`)v✓�. G� �/L-�ov�GE WLEf/I,T �^� a G�f/� �!►� ' _/ ) � -J �( COc.(,.✓i • �-`C`�O�hsil e.c,,� �b l�E[Y� ec.r1- �� SoT"cL�7i0� �7 w`� � ' '� b�.�-,r- �V a��v� '�7 �E.'� '�'L2 � . 1..t9 v a-� 2� �� f'` S �� D '�-��5 G S �-vlcQ � Z1'�-�' C�ou�eo� '�i '��? `C� �? �of-vt c�.� ? �,t� �.�Z u.,� vvLo hu.w«�.-� r �s� t��.c��s�e� _ 1 i me, i5�o Ii�LE r�.55GV�C e � . . ' � ��tit.Cc�°rL,o � t �r C{�I.o dte � �o2-J�-- `��O�p ��a r�i�►�l !p IV\.. C�a c��.�,•� r�-+ � . _..._. .�._. .___,._.... . . ._..._.--._ ' r � � The Aspea Times , ro�r,n o�� co. ��. : .. rixxirr co. i Box E Publio Hearing i;::: _; ' •,;; f i' Aspen, Colorado Dato �• 8•8.83 .• _................ ' � sub�oct �: 1KAA 1041 � .. i PROOF OF PUBLtCATION sTnrE oF coLOxano � Copy of Notice > SS. County of Pitk3n ) prvvuv..........�- ., PT�HLIC NOTIC£ '-�'' . _ RE:p�n Mwle 3chaol 1041 Soeelsl Revfew j'T1�.�.1$1T1 R; DU21c1Wa NOTICE`!S HEREBY CIV6N that• �bu� i� - , do solemnly sK�ear that I+�arin��u be hero berorc�he eo.�a or cPouncy Comm adunen of Pitkin County Celorodo on MondeW:Aa�8:1983 at s mectity�to 6egin at' . I am the Publisher �o:ooam•t��t�eCommiwionero'Meetin RoomoC of THE ASPEN TIMES; �thePflkinCndntyCouKhoues'508EMa�oStreet, Aapento'canaider 1011 speeisf roview a roe�l to that the same es a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, ■n�w,th��MusieSchoolt000nnec�°iheam- and published in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has pu�to tt+e'City water eystem and Aipen Metin SanilaUon'INetrid ae�►age treatmept syatem.For a genera( circulation therein; that said newspaper has been pub- fureher informalion:oonted the Plsmm�g 015m, 130 S Calene Stmt,Aspen.925-2020,ext 224. lished continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitliin, • � ceo Madxn,Chsirm.n for a period of more than fifi -two conseculi��e weeks next ' ' ��unty Commiwlonerr Y pilo! Pu6lbhed in the Aapen T[ma July T,1983. to the first publicatfon of the annexed legal notice or advertise- ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States mails as second-class matter under ihe provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- paper is a weekly newspaper duIy qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every� number of said week2y newspaper for the period of � consecutive. insertions; and � that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said � newspaper dated July ? A.D., 19� and that ' the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news- paper dated A.D., 29_ ,� �� SubscrIbed and sworn to betore me,.a notary public in a�d or the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, this �,_. day of A.D., 19(� Notary Public ' ' � Aiy commission expires � � � Tha Aspen Times �orr,� �:.� co. c:� : . ., Box E rt'rl:i�r c;. Public fIeor:.::� :: ., Aspen, Colorado Da;0 8.8.83 , : __.............................. Subjcct :��N RACQUET CI,UB PROOF OF PUBLICATI�N STATE OF COLORADO ) COp�/ Of NOtIC@ ) ss. County of Pitkin ) '""� "'"�� pubiic:notice� :rusuc,horice ns: ��tq�� c��$p�i��w�. t Willi.am R: Dt�l,away xa'�r cE IS HEREBY GIVEN tbet a bii� . do solemnly se�ear that t��ari�.;n�neta 6rrore u�e emra.d(�„ey ' Commiesionen af Pitkio County,;Colorado on MOedaY.A B,.I9B3 st e mectiag t6 begin el I am the Publisher �o:�oam��e«omte.to,�.•Meetin$Roomol of THE ASPEN TIMES; '�hePitkinCountyCouFtl�w�ae,606EMemStrcet that the same is a weekly newspaper prinled, in whole or in part, ��°�O�O^°�d�'spm al neylew appmoel far the and published in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has °Y�bp��f of the Aepen'Racawt Club elub Iac�t9lhe Plsnning��jbjp S Gakni�3ieeel a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been pub- n.pen,s2s-zozo�x�.rls. • lished continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitkin, , • '• ' �^ M��:cb:irn�4 for a ! Publiehed in the�n��Ju1C7m19 3��eR perlod of more than fiftytwo conseculive weeks next prior , '� Y • to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions ot the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was pubiished in the regular and enttre issue of every� number of said weekly newspaper for the period of Z consecutive. insertions; and � that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated JU�-.V 7 A.D., 19� and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news- paper dated A.D., 19_ �v / Subscribed and sK�orn to before me,.a notary pubiic in and for • the County of PI 'n, State of Colora , this /� , day of � � A.D., 19 I , Notary Public � I My commission expires /�' � �� The Aspea Times r��1rp or �o. �o�.,J��R�s PITItIN C0. • BOX E Public Iicaring �shibits � 8.8.f33 Aspen, Colorado D��O ` --•••••-•••�'°..�" . SuU3act : SUNDECK � PRODF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ) COP�/ Of NOtIC@ ) ss. . . .. _,, ... . ..• County of Pflkin ) pl1�J��C 1'tO�C@�^��. RE:Exprn�ion�Su�eck Restaurant:�8pec(el Review IjOTICE�19�flEREHY GIVEN'liiat•L�ublic I� W7.111.7.1i1 A.• Dunaway do solemnly sw�ear that n�..��s,w!n�n�ia�ro►"w�:e,°'�a��°"°�Y Commiatonen.af Pitkia Coun Colondo on Publisher ��r:��e;1983�ts ro�sth:oc 1 L•00 uo in ehe Comm�worcn'M Roam of, I am the of THE ASPEN TIMES� theP9ekinCounEyConethwel,6oB£M�nst�et;. Aspen to consider�pec(sl;iaview�pP�ovd,fat e�c- that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, amion.oC the 3undeck Rntiurent on�.�� and pubtished in the Counly of Pitkin, State of Colorado and has �tounuia7'ea�p��1bWenrlmrl.000Nuarc' + feeto[th�ire�cialingdeek.Fo[furtAetinfarmadon. a generai cireulation therein; that said newspaper has been pub- contadthePfannSn�0111ce;;1305(3eleneStreet, Aspen.82b-2020�ext 228. lished eontinuousty and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitkin, ceorge 1Hea.e'n:Che��man Bosrd orCaunty Commfduonen for a period of more than fiftytwo consecutive weeks next pt10f Publi�hed in the Aspen Times Juty 7..iea3., to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- meot; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the Un{ted States mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publish'sng legal notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the 5tate of Colorado. ThBt the annexed legal �otice or advertisement was published in the regular and enlire issue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the period of 1 consec�tive insertions; and � that the tirst publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated Ju�y ? A.D., 19� and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news- paper dated A.D., 19_ i Subscribed and sK�orn to before me,.a notary public in and f r t e Co ty of Pi n, Stat� of Colora , this �.day of A.D., 19� / • L:�.��%I..�C/ Notary Public O i �My commission expires i i. �\ The Aspen Times yolr,b oi� r,o, c.r.::;� .. : BOX E PITJCI?i �(1. Publie F1e�tr,r,� •• • A'spen, �Colorado p p'�" '` ' Du^1.0 : O.�.U3 ' _..."............................ $tlb j CCt ; ORDINAIVCfs @ CC'NA1 CENTE --�—....�._._........... PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ) COp�/ Of NOtIC@ ) ss. County of Pitkin ) '�� _.._ ..,..-•-.:•-...-.........,, , publio::nottce:�� t '`..-., �A�ORDINANCE AUTNORIZINO TH£CON•'j j� wl.�.�.ladn A,� Dunaway a0 SO�CR1Il�y SN•ear l}I8t :VEYANCE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY Zp;�IStITUTING PART OF THE COMMUNITY i � CENTER TO CARE CENTER COMrf17TEE FpR PUUIISYI@T' THE PUflPOS&OF-DEVELOP�IENT..OF A ' I am the af THE ASPEN TIMES; SENIOR NOUSING PROJECf '�'- :, NOTJCE IS HENEBY GIVEN,lliat a yubLr• ihat the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, n�aria wia t�hcte:eetm�a ehe eoaraocc.ounW:� and ubllshed in the County af Pitkin State of Colorado, and has comm�i�.+ionen of!'iticin.Counly,Goioroao on_� P . \fonday.Auj�ust B,39.&7,aCu meclin Jo be�in,at ; a generai circulation therein; that said newspaper has been pUb- ]1:3DeminthcCommiesionerartdetgnaaoomos• �hc Pitkin Count .Courthou�j b06 E�et Mein ? Iished continuously and uninterruptedly in said Gounty of Pitkin, si��,t�en:co�Oraao;W rnpuder,tM above re�;; fOY 8 p fi�rencee ordlnanee For tarther inFomiatkn con-- period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next tIOI' tact the Coun�Acwm�y,508�ast Main Stceet : ARpen.925-7 8:..-:... .�., :;. :.b.. . . to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- cro �Muascn;Ch.t:mo�:: ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States eoara orc`�ounty Commieeioncrs �Publiehed in thc Aspcn Timn July 14,19¢3. mails as second-class matter under the provisions o[ the Act of ' ' '" ' � ° ' �"" " March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. Th�t the annexed legai notice or advertisement a•as published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly , newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated �uly 14 a.D., 19� and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news- P papei dated A.D., 19_ . ��G�,'��/l��,GG�� ,GG� Q°z%�z� Subseribed and sworn to before me,.a notary public in and for the County of PItkin, State of Colorado, this �_.day of A.D., 19\� � ' �/� / L1/ % ��/`��iu✓.J • � Notary Public '� � _ i My commission expires — i,,