The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.min.reg.01141983 „ ' , ,, `''r,-;: s�, . � _ • �,. r�'��,�.� � o� ,,�� .' S �� + }'.�`'t i.S � 1 � tti. .� � rt ixY a��4. t1�4i�fi'U Y r��l 'E�'1�5i• � ��``�3`�''� } �i�FM-�• � � °f.ky � c ,��-' a�k. . � ��e� r ?S.'S.S�� st � . f^�, ��,r � ��i _'� it��]��r{�.fp Si'�r�1��L^y � �a�S'�7�jr`i'�'�'�i �.a k.�a�'`i �"..=5 P� �vYkl ��6 � �,j�'r��Y''t��"��a��N r . A�L- ,�`� S. �7;�i(��R �t Y'.'.1t 3 5.,�'.1� 3� �Y Y;:. j�j's�}'� .l � ��R' 4 � ( ��f+�.N27f�-.�•t�}1'A�� ;.ixwc2ww:..itLt��..;...•�Sd;';�a+-'Lv��,9�:�fa.,-.!....... .�” . .. . . . __ , .. - ..-... . . , .':..:;;t_. ' . . r.;�� '�;� � �� x ��!��_'��i {. �� M, f � :�� i�;`a,,.,�. '; . . r�': _ rf�y ' � . r L.y+� ` BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA r �$ y� �,..., ... a`�=i' 14 NOVEMBER, 1983 �`'a c�.. y�..,� . . ,c�'S+'c,:t iJ±'_�5..; . :h:4`�r_: . i:-�'�;��:� . . i�.^:;� `'�b�'� 9:30 a.m. Executive Session - Litigation - Tom Smith, County Attorney ��r i'��-� ��.�.< ,�'°'"''°` LAND USE !`t. - :-.°"�+ ' s-�:. � ';� 10:00 Public Hearing - LUC Amend: County Road Management Plan s and Standards - Alan Richman, Planning �,�,� 1 � 10:30 Public Hearing - Stapleton Lot Split, General Submission - �, , Colette Penne, Planning , f .;� ;�'•".r`C: s<,>::- 10:55 Break ';A . 11:o0 Sachs/Finkelstein Subdivision Exemption - Richard Grice, ? Planning 4,, < � � ; �,,�. 11:30 Public Hearing - Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance to World < #.t,,Y. Class Housing - Tom Smith � 12;00 Lunch Break �� 7ti;;;,-,' 1:30 p.m. Public Comment ir ; �''. ,� ADMINISTRATION , r � .'`" 1:45 Resolutions and Contracts Q , �Y`� Minutes � �". ; Aspen Racquet Club Special Review - Colette Penne �` ;„;:.= Mechanical Specialties Inc Contract Award - Mike Slugocki � Transit Agency Intergovernmental Agreement - Curt Stewart -k;. �;?"` �,':: : c,:,�_.,; County Sales Tax Distribution - Tom Oken � � :� � o, ': Pirst Reading - Tom Oken - Finance Director � Bus Bonds Resolution .� a 3 '� tr-� . 2:15 First Reading - Lynn Dunlop, Budget Analyst �.: Set Mill Levy: Pitkin County & Road Improvement Districts � „` ' -' Mill Levy Certification �' '= f"<;; . �+,` : �>'?, 2:30 First Reading and set Public Hearing �'x... ��?' Amend Airpozt Regulations: Early Morning Flights - Dick Arnold, `��:. Airport Manager 28 November, 1983 @ 2:30 p.m. x3; • ;r. 3:30 Colorado Department of Highways: Presentation on Five Year �; Plan - Richard Derske, District Engineer ��,. �, 4:00 Joint Meeting �,� Bus Bonds Lease Agreement - Tom Oken `{ City/County Water Trust Continued - Mark Fuller, Environmental �t Coordinator , '�"' Ruedi Hydropower Construction Proposals - Mark Fuller Er,:;; s�� 5:00 Second Reading - Tom Oken Bus Bonds Resolution Set Mill Levy: Pitkin County & Road Improvement Districts �;4, 1'�, -' __.. ____. _..__ _ ___�_.�� ,�, �„ :�';;{�� ' " 'r� , _ � '++��F ,��_ r ,L,+� .. ,�,�,y� ��" cr.� �-c• r� � t o"S"L+r.r t?i'7"'"�;ti�.t"E,{,�'x a;,� � Y..:.�+��ti �-,�i slyti.'��.4+y,dr.. ��.:k+5s�¢'�i`,yz. .��.� •��A��9a�.-I4 ..i.,....�'DiY��R�.Faw'.��!��.�..n��fi.1�.J,v�i1.-__.i7..-t.:::YiJ�e�� V.�: � ,.. �; j., :. '._:...„, . ;(�:.>,:3! •��'.'.4 '�4^. ��.Y.:��.� ,{��.t,: vj"" k:, k . M1� L • �� B . f- 4 ;�-p a:,<�;:: , ;: ��'�r �. �-;' �� r�; ! ;�: �� -;�., ��`; ;��- a'`�'�= ��`� - ;� �, ; ,;.�;n: r�`;k- PITKIN COUN7'Y ��?'�: BOARD OF CClNII7ISSI0[�RS �'° i �+"" i �:ti>�; , XY� . � L�,4'.' L%aa; i 1;"'�: . 1 R•.:�- .1 k� 14 NOVEN�ER, 1983 ! i:;:.:r.REGfJLAR MEETING t ;'PI�SENT: C�ORGE MADSEN, THOMAS BLAKE, MICHAEL KINSLEY, HELEN KLANDERUD, ROBERT W 41ILb �"� i"':. . � -; —�^----__ �; '•Public The Board convened a pubLic hearing to consider a proposed amenc�nent to the Land ;+'""'. Heazin �. �� `'f�?LUC 9� Use Code adopting the Pitkiu County Road Managanent Plan and Rflad Standards and r -Amend ,. � rRoad Specifications_ Assistant Planning Director Alan Richnan submitted to the record the � ;�Mg�t � 4A �,Plan Planning Office irnlno of 14 NovP.mber, 1983, and attachments, the Aspen Area General l `9 •� , �,,,�� Plan as amended, and the Land Use Code as a¢nended to date. The above docunents � � � c ��.�; c,�xe drafted by the Engineering Department and would update, respectiveZy, the 1973 � , ; t::�s=.:, a. ,. - 3c'+��.�,k.:-.s; �k _, Road lvetwnrk Rnalysi.s and the 1975 Raad Standards and Specifications Report. Both of � ��"-'-� the earlier reports were drafted for the County by the firm Briscoe, Maphis, Murray �� ;�� '.�.; ' ��y'='_°� "£" and Lamont. ��. The Road Standards are specifically identified in Sections 5-501.3 and 5-501.12 of the Code as the reference doc�msent to be used in the design of roads and trai.ls for subdivision as we]1 as public road i�rovements. The Road Management Plan pravides a � carQrehensive analysis of the existing road network and prioritizes the various road . . ��iys�;� � , :a� i[�rovement pmjects within the County. Both doctm�ents appear in the reference section of the Code as general references for planning purposes. �� ; Richmazi explained that the Code must be �riended to forttialize the adoption of both •i � , < Ca�missioner's Meeting 14 Nove�er, 1983 - 1 y�,r..^;.,;^;+;t�f;:J .••y•.�'wau':�4t:1 _ .�m_v�_. ..-- '•.r;;;, �� z � . � : r � ... _ ' f � �"r,: L4� y j • y :, �:,. r ; c?'� '7i a x� 1 �rr a . tic.. �.r a ayttx3 �y' rt�,� . �1,x.il�i'f�!-.3��i .- •+ ] v'� �Yr' X y{ �ie. {r� yi,f �!� ��"r iy r '"� Y�A,� ��' ��'t��r�t� {f K � � ��i�;,`�U 6i K . � 11t.e �i. 1 �4�,, : � a f. Kfr�� yi�fw'�> .:.t• n J��{.._^.:.R�" r;1ti'DFR�,'3�?�4'��?�i^.Ik�..n...w-..�.r,S:.__"r it�.�..._......y..'..1 �4..ri:.i r...._.�.;1t_" . . h�'x_._.._�. �'_._ . .__ �. ... ... Y3 �� . ' � upclated docimients; the Planning and Zoning Cartnission reviewed such an �nendment i:z;'... :� �`' f " � at their regular meeting on 4 October, and reoortmended apprwal. � Assistant County Engineer Ron Tha�son explained that the Road Manag�nent Plan ;`�" ; identified the ranking and cost of i�roving twenty-four (24) major County roads. The �' ., :� � first four (4) road projects identified on the listing have been co�leted, the lower ,,��7...: .:� . �^ . Woody Creek Road has been partially caapleted, and approximately one half (�) of the ';,Z^r;T:�;. Ertma Road has been chip sealed. iN'T, ?;�%�s- Child asked if the Management Plan provided for dust control. County Manager Curt �•`•>,�`;.;,.�" Stewart explained that the iag�rovasnents identified in the Plan did not include dust �x,,:,,;;: ,`,` r� control measures; such has been transferred to Ftoad and Bridge maintenance. h_'::..:,.,,:. �':'.�'..`'` �,•s�V: ;�wc.�...,,: Tho�son explained that the Road Standards and Specifications report recently �! _4 drafted by his office vsould provide for standards more consi.stent with the rural .'r; ;'� . •�-� � character of the County as well as confonn to adopted growth policies and land use !; +,� plans. The previous standards were representative of a subdivision standard for urban ::�':,9 �; areas on the front range, where sixty (60} foot rights-of-way, sidewalks, and other `�`'�-"� features were necessazy. The Specifications report sutxaitted for approval today would %'f 7p, ',.,; generally provide for a reduction in those standards; right-of-way requirelnents have � �"'�- ` been lowered in some i.nstances to as little as thirty (30) feet. Y F I Y'_{ ,. .i Kinsley noted that the Management Plan accorded a high priority to i�cq�rovements on ;�: Owl Creek Road, whereas the Board generally agreed that no substantial improvements �t should be made to this Road. He aiso noted that the criteria for ii[groving the various ' & "� ��y ?� roads, including safety measures, traffic coimts and others, did not account for �� . . ` rr; growth i�acts. He suggested that the Board conduct a work session to allow for �; ;-' - "� .' further analysis prior to adoption. y` t;�«:.._:;..- :w�_ �3 , �;., Madsen then opened the hearing for public cannent. Planning and Zoning Cortmission �':• � a � m�nber Suzanne Caskey e�cplained that the Co�miission was somewhat concerned with the � �'"" ranlcing schedule, and particularly with the priority given Owl Cxeek Road. She �` �� s , � '}' . explained that the Comrtission unanimously agreed that Owl Creek Road should not be �'�'':'',:, �-"�-. priaritized for u�rovement. ��t r. -: ,�,� Stanley Natal requested that the Board fimd a dust control program annually and that �-;M� the scope of the program be expanded. Natal was particularly concerned with fugitive ;,� ;n`k,;� dust on Woody Creek Road and its adverse i�act on agriculture; such has resulted in ,;,�: ::�=;, di.seased livestock, has reduced the value of hay, and others. -�t""'- Madsen explained that the Board has reviewed the dust control program and has agreed �iy�S. i:�r -- to continue, and extend, sai.d program next year. :;�`+ r�M Natal also requested that the Board consider chipping Woody Creek Road; traffic'has "�'��' increased on the road, including in the Lenado area, and Natal understood that there �;",� `>.ra ��; �µ� 14 November, 1983 - 2 '�;:F pomnissioner's Meeting -�r.:�::,,, , .``," �� _ N .. ti � D"�' � `�' "� ') , F` J°\; - � - �,�''"� � Yf�r Lr. � � `rt 1� cr ..sry,��x�� f� ( !r ";:t ` r�(�`T`'"fti��..-'r?{ jf��^ t ��-k , ,�r�'!.;`Y e�+�f.{ry�.i A r;� � ��'�,�. ; ''} �,;uS'Y�r�, fj P , � ._......�vh�^'a.`.AF.�+:+.+.�k!iiYn.,ba ..._,t:!n.__.��...t.,_..:.....,.d. �'�ir...l_....�:... _'�'.. '. ��.�2"r4.H,.��S,..'Ft-4`MiavG t R:L'_. (� , :I was sufficient right-of-way along its entire course to allow for such an imprwement. i^� } i� � ;1 � Cora Natal requested that gravel be applied to the road on that portion that has not been paved; ttve road has not been paved beyond the Stranahan Ranch. i.. i},,-. ��r. ,; Lee Schwaller did not feel that there were sufficient skilled operators in the Road ', �k c�...�-�•_: �. 7• - � and Bridge Department although there was sufficient equipm�nt; various equipment, �` � :r1�;-`- including graders, mowers and others, re�nains idl.e due to the lack of operators, and �� , :�':.- �,�`� Schwaller suggested that additional personnel be hired. t�_ C� .I Madsen asked for additional comnents; there being none, the hearing was closed. •�`"•i""� The Board generally agreed to conduct a work session on the proposed Code amendment s �,<,.,_,.,;i to review the following: the Management Plan and the ranking of the various road �� projects, the proposed standards and specifications (it may be �propriate, for _s>s;, :�;<;:'_.�'.,� instance, to reduce some of these standards even further), the land use implications `� ; �� + associated with the i�rovements, and the need for additional personnel in the Road " rx I ' and Bridge Department, The Board also agreed, when reviewing the budget for the Road r�-='=`'�?!I and Bridge Department, to address the dust control program and other maintenance issues not identified in the above docimients. � Kinsley then moved to table the proposed Co3e amendment pending the work session, 1.r - : • �'�d= ��' Klanderud seconded and the motion passed unanimously. . , _. y: � �:_.,.., . _�__'_____ fi9 Public The Boazd wnvened a public hearing to consider the Stapleton Lot Sp].it, a general �..,. Hearing: �;;`�'""`' Stapleton submission application. Planner Colette Penne submitted to the record the Planning ;�:-,: - -'.. Lot ; '��",:,;5'; S}ilit Office merm of 14 November, 1983, and attackments, and the Land Use Code as amended to 3 :F;+�'>:�.$, t �`'�:�-- date. T1� applicant has requested an agricultural lat split on a parcel of land ` Y� I � slightly larger than twenty (20) acres in size situated on Owl Creek Road, to allow � + � for the creation of two (2) separate parcels of approximately ten (10) acres each. �� The a lication was submitted ursuant to Section 4-6(a) of the Land Use Code which � �;^. i,'+ PP P �. k � � " ;, allows for the creation of no more than two (2) single-family lots in the AF-1 zone ` y j , i� district for on-going agricultural operations. The use of the subject property for � � ; '� agricultural pusposes has been demonstrated; the property has accarodated an on-going �°try:}:� ';��`"� a icultural ration for ._�; gr ope greater than thirty-five (35) years, the Coc�nty Assessor ��::;>.. '�;� has assessed and ta�ced the parcel as agricultisal land, and the applicant has provided .��r' ��i: ,°��4,.�',� federal tax returns docwnenting the agricultural use of the property. k�;F<i: �"R� Referral cormients were generally supportive; the Colorado Division of Water Resources ��;:: ' �.; made various recamendations with respect to water supply, the Department of Environ- �;:,:� ss:�`. mental Health has reviewed water and sewer services, and the County Engineer has �±�; .,;; ;��> addressed access to the property. The Planning and Zoning Conmission reviewed the ,�;: application at their regular meeting on 4 October, and recoim�ended approval subject �r=' :5�� ,...�. :y �� '.,��; Oo[[missioner's NI�f;*� 14 November, 1983 - 3 �', r� `, ��:.�; ' � _ �� - . _(.t. ,L� .�'� �6�r .i� r , n �-t�_t ,;�,ry��€�� -. r y31(�_, ,� p i ..rlF,�jt�. �., s- r:t�'k.�'r �. „+ 2a ix'ai S� 3. �� e f � t`+ k� : � �:21: !� �': �� - �s "`t c% ��;°'L`��=?1s ��r��'� Y'�'�Sz. �1i2'c �t �'{ .t;ry tr N �r }y,t+ti' : y2. �� .1�.>.i y,�l,/ . �,; '�"'�.�S:it�'r`�A'-�Ya.,'��1 z.. •X.::'�»�.v�.s.+.�:e�r+Fi�#:.n:..�.n..:.-�,��k.'..ti.._.1,'.f:c.��" "�'�.}.�i' �e,.*'..:'��J'Y,'�<<t_:�_.�.-?=�i...._ .} ki,. �. 5; � to the followi.ng six (6) conditions: ~"a �:.� • � - if the spring is to be tY�e water supply source, the arrangements for a shared water "'� supply as listed by the Division of Water Resources be made and the i�rova[�ents '! required by the Environmental Health Department be met � ��:� - unless a househoZd use well pesmit is secured for Parcel W, language must be added >°;.`• =^`! to the plat for co�s�ac�er pmtection puzposes stating that such a well may be � • �� necessary in the future - verification of the acceptability of the proposed sewage disposal system by the };� Environmental Health Department at detailed submi.ssion � "' ±: - driveways intersecting O�al Creek Road must meet County standards � ,�I' . • - utility extensions to the new hane site shall be placed underground � �- - should the agricultural use be tezminated, dogs will be prohibited i �'p.. .p.-� �� Child asked if the prohibition against dogs was consistent with other land use i�� ;� applications. Penne explained that a similar condition was inq�osed on the Owl Creek ;m �r Q� application and others. In this instance, the applicant indicated that dogs were �'.� :`c necessazy for the agricultural operation and the condition was drafted to accordingly. �yi: � Gary Wright, an attorney representing the applicant, noted that the agplicant has ��3� obtained a Forest Service Pexmit which provides access to an estimated five thousand �� (5,000) acres; the amownt of acreage available to the applicant was actually based on ,f ' ;��`: a specific ncanber of cow pairs, and this has been estimated at approximately five ,;, i"�' '"'"`� thousand (5,000) acres. 5�;�, ..., `',=�_� Madsen then opened the hearing for public conment. Jackie Broughton, an adjacent � F:�; ;' .H'�`'! property a�mer, supported the lot split as rec2uested by the applicant. .j Wright explained that, with respect to water supply, the applicant did not intend to ;; i ' -^y>41 drill another well to service the new residence. The exi.sting spring serves two (2) � -i �::,1 residences at this time, one (1) of which would likely be served by the Owl Creek �,�'.+ Subdivision once it vas developed. This would allow for the new residence to be served :Y�" �' b the s rin " 7,-; y p g, in which case another well was not considered necessary. Wright stated = +�Y that the applicant nonetheless agreed to corr�ly with the recam�endations of the �'` ?-';� +�:: i;�` Division of Water Resources. �`.:r,' t� �k Madsen asked for additional cam�.nts; there being none, the hearing was closed. ,� �f � f; Child crnved general submission approval of the application subject to the six (6) "� r � conditions of the Planning and Zoning Comnission, Blake seconded and the motion passed x �,. 1 �� unanimously . " ��; '= < ---------- � ' Sachs/ Richard Grice introduced the Sachs/Finkelstein application, a svbdivi.sion exer�tion ,; Finkel- `� stei.n request submitted pursuant to the statutoxy authority identified in C.R.S. 30-28-101 � Subdiv F�-. Ex�t (10)(d). The applicant has requested appmval to adjust the lot lines of the tvro (2) �t lots in the Speer Woody Creek Subdivision; Lot One (1) presently contains approximately ,,. �: thirty-two and one half (32.50) acres artd Lot 7Wo (2) approximately ten (10} acres. ��,,� :,�:' The applicant has proposed to convey approximately si.xteen and one half (16.5) acres from Lot One (1) to Lot 7t�m (2); tt� foxmer would decrease in size to approxicn3tely �: = � ,i.•� Canni.ssioner's Meeting 14 NovemUer, 19$3 - 4 i°,s:�-�. i•= ,`afF!, �� . � -.. � F � t ��YZ �L s- ::- r �.�r��•:. - �-�.: x�."yia {•}y��'y�'y6� t5! Iz�,t i } �� ? s i•4�rfi� .._ 's��} � ��9. 5'�t z..r \'. : � ti.i'L� 4r�i ..`s��c q��}t��c✓ �x �. � /4 t �3 � t 1� �� t, � �e�YP2'��'�+Y t_�. v .c 4 i r .� 4 / ik ,h _t . l. { .: � ,y t.l� '/ "1}Y + 5 ?S 1 . NJ1�"� 1,��L'['> Ef�. y1 su.�f+ � � :,_,...^...:a`�'a'3"K �v ��._.. �,�f2.h��. d ..,, 7,c,�� ...a..r.hsG!++`"71t;... :�Sh,t«�as . _._ xS�_._... .1..�.. �__ . .., .�.1.._..-..ti�, ._._. . .. -.._ . .- . i � �- J sixteen (16) acres and the latter vrould i.ncrease in size to approximately twenty-six i; � - i 'il�,:-,; and one half (26.5) acres. As a result of the lot line adjustment, Lot One (1) would ;.n;. - i beccene non-confornung, and the currently non-confoLming Lot 'Iwm (2) v�rould become +.��,�%:' � `� � confornting. " � I � ,�, :� Grice explained that the adjustment was not intended to create a new lot or paroel �'�::. .� �� ? for developm�nt or resale purposes, rather, the original n�er of lots would be `� � ��,';-�.? j�=�'�-� maintained. He also noted that, although the adjustment would increase the non- „�..,,� rr.0.•'._ §:c�=s�",� confoLmity of one (1) of the lots, such would result in a net decrease in non- ,t r:,.._ �Y`��', conformity for the subdivision_ Finally, variations Erom the POD zone district s^�'�.:,;� 4�`"�%�'-�'� ji,��^j requirem�zts are pezmitted under certain circianstances; in this instance, the <`=•` ::� ,..>.;.�",, 1�4.,.� topography of the subdivision is such that the adjustment proposed was considered the i'.',�:;?i lv`�,,,;� most appropriate boimdary between the lots, The approximately sixteen (16) acre ' 7� • parcel to be conveyed was contiguous to tk� residence on Lot 7Wo (2) whereas it was t, , ;i not visible from the residence on Lot One (1). Y �i ;� The Planning Office recmnnended approval of the exe�g�tion subject to the follawing . � ;� condition: � y;x��,;; - the applicant shall prepare a subdivision exe�tion plat to be approved by the +""'''` Count En i.neer and Attorne rior to recordin ; ��^,::_� Y 9 Y P 4 r��u',;, Applicant Jeff Sachs noted that the County Engineer had requested that the property u 3. 4 ='��? be re-surveyed and a subdivision exe�tion plat subsequently prepared. He noted that z::::'.:: �`.`-`.i''� an on-ground survey for the subdivision was accoc�lished in 1976, and it was expected 4:?=;;. that the existing survey could be certified to include the lot line adjustment ;:'�„;: Y:."h:�= proposed; this certification would alleviate the need and expense of providing for T� ��+ another survey. Grice suggeste@ that the need for another survey be left to the t� ci discretion of the County Engineer; in the event the Engineer approved of the exi.sting � * survey with a certification to include the lot line adjustment, a re-survey would �f �i:.;'- ;� �' ` not be necessazy. � � .R.r,.:'� : 'fc:�:.i-. `��t�� : = Blake suggested that the Board consider delegating lot line adjustments to the `�;`-:; .�r,;"�. ir.�: : F,��:;�,: Planning and Zoning Caimission. Grice felt that it would be appropriate to delegate �;a£ �'*.'G th'�•r.� „ ri to the Cortmission those ex�tions grovided for in the Code; the application naa ��: �� before tt� Board was submitted pursuant to statute, haaever, which exerrq�tion was a� �; considered appropriate for Board review. Yk�N . �''='= Blake moved approval oE the Sachs/Finkelstein Subdivision E�c�tion subject to the :i, � ��_• •'-=: one (1) condition of the Planning Office noted above. Kinsley seconded and the motion � �>`' passed unanimously. �� -` ---------- '`.i,. _ '�. Public The Board convened a puUlic hearing to consider on second reading an ordinance ��';� Hearing: �*� Ordinance authorizing disposal, by Pitkin County, of certain real property to World Class �{ Convey 4 �} f•:raG:. �.•' Ccat[nissioner's tin9 14 ovemUes 983 - B••s.: „ :�;' • , ':�:,;�:. � - � � t..� 'S ��.� .` '�� 'c/ ,�� r K n �;�_. �� iA�}�s�.�b. �- r,r ��i"t�.�{a� l �rlf€ � � ��+� °�j.sL� f[ � Y� > >/ .. ..,Y.�_.�'sldi ".�'§'�.i.`EyP��4�M�..�'x� G�.r.i:Icr..l�.��Y�.,��l�l.ra..�_�h 1 u,,u�..i .��}.d...),,.,I�A��%L.'"y`��j�.�`... ... .;;:._.�� . • World Housing, Inc. to enable World Class Housing, 7nc. to develop an a�loyee housing l. � Class ;; >: 1 Housing project on the property, County Attorney Tan Sanith introduced the ordinance, which S 1�-'-`' ` would authorize the conve ce of certain real r ,,,, � Y� P oPer�Y, obtained by the Coimty , ;a . pursuant to settlement of litigation, to World Class Housing, Inc. to accqcadate the �` 4 . : proposed Phase N project. Deeds and other docimients were recorded on 7 November, l� : �;;. ''�k�'-�' and the Count now has le al title to the sub'ect p pe y ��;;;,;,_ y g � parcel. The ro rt could be L-'” �r ; `' conveyecl to the developer upon the approval o£ the ordinance and subsequent to its �"ax,w�^''�{ , �,,,-��;;i publication; the conveyance of the parcel would mandate compliance with the terms ri+x;'�2 �. 7:�:�'•�:?',` sT:<;° and conditions identified in the Dis sition and Develo nt A eement entered into :3'r_�a� P� 1� 9r E;:<r:- (:�i4}::; between the Board and the developer in May of this year. In the event those conditions �r", �w�. ��,:`"7 are not satisfied, the awnership of the parcel would revert to the County. 1�``,^:� YF4 T�:.�:,. '•�,:;,�' Madsen then opened the hearing for public cartnent. Andy Stone understood that 'ir;::;;_i 1=";`:' ,�;:� Centennial Partners, Ltd. was the applicant for the Phase N project. Smith explained '' r�t � � ,� that World Class Housing, Inc. was the successor in interest to Centennial. Partners. He noted that the project would be restricted to �loyee housing by covenants which r:r ;x'c't;; would run with the land. �''�~ Madsen asked for additional conments; there bein none, the hearin was closed. �;;'.=;: 9 5 '��'''�� Child then m�ved a roval of the ordinance on second and final readin Kinsle �;�;;,' PP 9. Y � v :', - seconded and the motion passed imanimously. �: �>.''r� Public Klanderud explained that the Ruedi Water and Paver Authority recently reviewed G;'�- Comnent the hydro proposals for the reservoir, the Water Trust, and the EIS. The Authority " ��14 was conc�rned that the EIS would withdraw water to a level that vrould jeopardize `� Ys?,�.;: � . �y;:`: trout fisheries, and has agree@ to oppose this c3uring the public hearing. It was � � `�F" anticipated that each individual me�tiber of the Authority would likewise oppose the C; ',"•� ; ; EIS for the reseYVOir, as would Trout Unlimited. Klandeivd noted that Eagle County � ' �Y'-`:�: . . recentl oined the Authorit and that discussions were recent initiated on the ��:; :. �'-��' ¢,;iFy; Y ] Y, 13' • j�,: ..i f";�� purchase of h o r b the Cit of Glenwood S rin s. Y�' L�e Y Y P 3 �`__. r�,.;• '1` ^ � r �-:.: < -----�---- �t' � ��'�'�" Minutes The minutes of 26 Se �, pelr�ber, 1983, were reviewed and approved as submitted. ��, - ,r_ ---------- 's �: rj• Aspen Colette Penne introduced a resolution granti.ng special review approval for an �;�° Racquet �� Club addition to the Aspen Racquet Club subject to four (4) conditions of record. She ;�••t, noted that the followi.ng additional two (2) conditions should be included in the �'� ;;' resolution: '�,�� - a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued prior to implerr�entation of landscaping �i - the applicant shall develop a lighting design plan which will be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Carmission. The lighting plan shall be approved prior to the � : issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The use of sodiun vapor lighting is F�,; prohibited �i°i'Cannissioner's Meeti-ng 14 Novem�s. 1983 - 6 cS», {{.°.d.h"",,.-;� 1'."'-' :�s __ _._,.�----- -�-------- l'�:�;::r, ��l4� 1 �� j > , . . ��1 \�. YI j.� �� d�\.: ^ q 7 j'�r n�'�:1 � t . .11�., �y,,,T } i K�in ��k�r� � t y��Jr.2. , ��j��e�}:�'� `i�' 4t stt itr, °, `�,�`�y";t 3r^ :p�� `N,� ' � fi�t��F �'y a lv - L ,��> f' r r 'y r �. q��.G�� g' �h 4 4 pac�' 7�4 .$'f �.i ;! ._'_.'f�.-c.✓�+4'.�'.•.'f�F::.'LX^4:4t..._,.3 r_F,...._ �1 '� �.:'w:»....��.Ct_...�.�.._,.�.. $�..:..."1, . . -.:'.'. T_. _.. . - . .. .. I 1 i � Child moved approval of the resolution subject to the tc+ro (2) additional conditions `'`-',::' 1 =,� noted abwe, Madsen seconded and the motion passed unanimously. '?�` i , � { 1 ---------- 'a" � Mechan- Klandexvd moved approval of a resolution awarding shop equipment for the Bus �' '.� ical � . � SpeC Maintenance Facility to Mechanical Specialties, Inc. Kansley seconded and the motion � '; :�`.'�--( Award 3 ,: �r'i:�.:� Passed unan�mously. �`.e:�°:.:i : . • . �,,,--, . ..-i+..�..� ao-;.s_,. _�________ j�r=�"`i j �. 'Y"°!(..� . PC.:.i. Y�•_:`_�� Transit County Manager Curt Stewart introduced an Intergovenvnental Agreement for the `�+ '•! A9encY I,��F`� Inter- Transit Agency. The Agreement was reviewed during several previous joi.nt meetings, i:s��'"=t J��- `:::_;;. Agree and approved Uy the City Council on 26 Septerrber. Stewart sugctested an an�ndm°nt to �T�`s_ ...�.u:r'�� . '.`�'•'�� the Agreement concerning the Agency's 8oard of Directors to indicate that the joint �"`''''I :F<x;,::rt r;;,v! appoi.ntment to that board may be r�roved by majority vote of the Board and Council, :s,ti;.-:; '' "each voting separately". He also noted that that section of the Agreement concerning - �,-, �� :4the transfer of assets to the new Agency has not been finalized; it was not ]mawn, t�...,'1� for instance, when the transfer would actually occur, its method, the effective date, �a;:;':,.;,I . .�^-""-�' when the new Agency would be certified by UMPA, and others. Stewart e�lained that t._ .' �-:�;:t=. these issues would be resolved at a future date, at which t�me a letter of agreement �;,�-: �'?'�-- woutd be submitted for Board and Council approval, �r:�»::'�- �..' s..� ti. Klandexud noted that the Agreement provided for the transfer of assets to the new Authority on the date that the Agreement bec�ne effective. As it was considered ; �;�>';�i unlikely that the either the City or County wouZd convey their assets upon the r, .:} adaption of the Agreement, she suggested an amenc�tient as folla.�s: - � � �.�? , - all assets of the City and County transportation syst�ris shall be conveyed to the �', r " 2ransit Agency at no cost pursuant to the execution of a letter of agreement to � � � be submitted as an amendment to this Agree�c�ent + �1 suggested Finance Director Tan Oken/the deletion of the phrase iridicating that the assets would �,' : i + `;i � ':i be conveyed on the date that the Agreement becames effective. � ' � �;ry ;_ � ' Child suggested that Garfield County be included on the 1Ssting of potential b :. f=•',tt participants for the Advisory Camti.ttee. He noted that it may be appropriate to �;� ; ' �:;j `'�'`� include the Tovm of Redstone as well. - �q ; 4�r9 1 �;�� Stewart explai.ned that the Agreement must be approved by resolution; he submitted �' a resolution approving an Intergovernmental Agre�nent providi.ng for the creation, '.m operation and maintenance of a public transportation system by a joint Transit Agency, � and authorizing and directing exeuction of said agre��ent. Klanderud rtaved apprwal of the resolution and Co include within the Agreerr�ent those ament�[ients suggested by Oken, Stewart and Child. Hlaks seconded and the motion � passed unanvnously. p.: ��s 14 November, 1983 - 7 �`'i Qamu.ssioner's Meeting }., �.t,. _ _ _ _ , . :,. „y,;: � " i': •"V��' >{h�� ~k4� .� SS�..�. Y.. (`��r� ` �q� ' �� 7 �r'c �` rF��,9}��• z ti�„»> � �v �r �' �f i,..� 3 a? �_. r a t' y¢'<� c g "�'�,o t � ��7r�,� i`:_r� t� . ..J."t�r �t.��,�'X �3�S�r��yf y4 k L :, ��[`s�r t�q 4._r � 'o �_ --,�''ir� ��,i]��J5�4�,}T'*�a''',��e ° .• y tl�.::�r�''Nt'%1�'S't.�I�a�"�!"i:".Lr.�df. 4 r-._v.1 i'n�F:' ! df.__.�"�rr�.G'.�._ �. _.... .�..J..... ._.__ M`''ar� .f:�4%-° __..x�...i1 ,._y�.[... e: �' ;j ,, �.., � 4` ` t Pitw Tom Oken introduced a resolution establishing the foxmula for the distribution of �' : � Sales '+_" `- ; Tax the municipal share of County sales tax revenues for the year 1984 as required by �.a": '3 Share i:,- , ,� Resolution 78-121. Oken explained that fifty-seven percent (57g) of the proceeds from i„v;> � "'3 the County-wide sales tax is distributed amongst the mtmicipalities in the County; 5 '}--r � the allocation of this percentage is based upon the amount of County sales tax �.:,. � g:. �� collected in each municipality during the previous two (2) years. The resolution � . L�`,✓,<.`� i;;;..r: would allocate the percentage of tax to be received in i984 by the City of Aspen, „�-.:.. _ Jr� '��;. Zbwn of Basalt, and Town of Snowrtiass Village. ;�`_�i:;: �•�'•°;;•: i;�;;s.:," Child moved approval of the resolution, Blake seconded and the motion passed �Z !� unanimously. a,�.�:_;... ,< .:.:- �.r�_ ------°-- � .,.'� 1ST Tom Oken introduced on first reading a resolution to contract a special and Limited :s�;;,.'. - Read: EEY'r4` - - ' �1�?=: ,��Bus revenue obligation of Pit�cin County, Colorado, by issuing its sales tax revenue � �Bonds ' i bonds, Series 1983 in the aggregate principal artaunt of one million, five himdred r'.�° '=� � .;-� thousand dollars ($1,500,000), for the putpose of acquiring buses and necessazy i": - � � bus maintenance and storage facilities, funding reserves and paying costs of i.ssuance; �...'.,:;� . t',:::;'_,;=� prescribing the foxm of said bonds; providing for the application of certain sales ' ,�a �� S_,�N,;� taxes to pay the debt service thereon; prescribing other details concerning said r:: ...� bonds, including, but not limited to, covenants and agreelnents in connection there- ��, - with; appointing a trustee and paying agent; approving the foxm and execution and e u delivery of a lease agregnent with the City of Aspen, Co].orado, relating to the _ �, �,,,, :� properties fi��anced with the proceeds of said bonds; establishing a Covnty Capital � �'�-"=�� Inprovement Tn�st F1md and guidelines therefor; and repealing all resolutions in ;ysi: '-r conflict herewith. Oken explained that the resolution would prwide for the issuance r;: a: of bonds b the Count to rovide for the local share of the [7MPA ant for the Bus �-`' *c ; Y Y P 4=' j+�:. �j^�� Maintenance Facility and sixteen (16) new buses, and to establish a contingency fund ��': '4 ti �' r2 K .i'.:��.� *�...� �-� for the Transit Agency of approximately one hundred and thirteen thousand dollars �,.' 3 � � ($113,000). The issuance of the bonds by the County was agreed to by the Board �'�. ��' :7 '. ��f` � even though the City had agreed to provide the local share of the grant; such was >�.�, a..�f initiated as a City issuance would require voter approval at a special election, �.. �;s.,� whereas the County already received such approval during a special election this •"�?�:,. -`,.;x.� past May. The bonds would be issued against the County's existi.ng two percent (28) :�� "�" sales tax, although debt service wsts would be paid by the City from its seventh- �:. .. �+'�,ri:e. . . � �.�P�'��;!� ;�:,w,�'.. penny sales tax pending the implementation of the new County transit sales tax. Debt .ei"5<'-�`: .;�•:,;; rx•;: service payment by the City would be secured by a lease a9reement with the County ,�#: ��,� �.+:Yx for the buses and the bus maintenance facility. Once the County transit sales tax a?w becomes effective, the revenues produced by it alone would become security for the �;�� 1�:.. �,�. �•s �` ,�_.e: �;"�'��:` � 14 November, 1983 - 8 � Crnmissioner s Meetin9 �'°��'';``..' ,�...__ ,— ,;; ,�, , " �' c -5 , <.ti .�t; � s�,� � �, , � u; , � �� ,r ��,; � s � . � ��F.�t> � i J Rxa i .r :_1+. ty , f t .�+. 'yn . � i �,�y,y� .. �.:y 1 �{,� `4 ��y�.^., 1 id ..G � �.F _ c�.v' r �/f t t. ..�,k ! , i�``1�' .��r�.j�/'A''4 . �y Ii-�.ZYi 1.�. 4f � C i.`�'�k�' ! ,� .,j�i�rP�:r fS „�. . . } t l k�n 1-�' .r S.� h /�,�i��r z:. ��t R �' a.+��-" 11' yt,�J'R i:`b '�L k.'Fi'�:H ..��..i��XT:j"� ��n".�6..KM��..�.��..��w..��w.+.a�q++rW . � .. r. �. . _. .. ... ..._ .� .. � ' ' r f ��'-1' � bonds, the lease agreement would be terminated, and the lien against the County's ,., � :�;%:': ::' exi.sting sales tax would expire. ;;:: Oken explained that KischnerJMoore and E.F. Hutton would joi.ntly undenvrite the �,:-. ?: �;:'r�i��`:' issuance and have ca[mitted to purchasing the bonds at a net effective i,nterest rate �; ,F�f,�.::'-. . �..� �� :5;,�_y.:.; of eight and sixty-seven one hundredths percent (8.67�). Oken suggested an �nenc�ment � ,� � - ;'�f to the resolution with respect to the amount of sales tax to be rebated to the ;''.':`• t�:'�;'=°: City of Aspen; the am�unt of tax to be rebated to the Cit was y ;,, -_,, y previousl established Y�="' `�`�'�' at ten and four tenths y �, � .�;.:;;;:;. percent (10.4g), whereas an increase ma be necess for ;*r°�:.: °`• to twelve and one tenths percent (12.1�). Oken recomtt�ended that the following amendment �:�x=; ��:;-�`: i�-r,.;..... ��;,�_;; be inserted .imr�ediately subsequent to paragragh one (1), Section 6(F): �`s... ; � : " except that the County, by Resolution properly adopted, may and hereby _ ,�[;;:;,i expresses its intentions to, increase the payments to the City of Aspen ""'`=�'`'+ £or maintenance of the Mall to an amount not to exceed twelve and one F'' ` tenths percent (12.1�) of that portion of the additional one percent ' .�; .��,l�!:°� (lg) County-wide sales tax collected in that ar within the Cit of r�.'..� Aspen" S'e y eci,?;!% Klanderud noted that the County, as issuer o£ the bonds, would be responsible for r,•�:�-.. ',r.~,:�." their repayment; she expressed some concern, in the event sales ta�c revenues decline, � �"�`"? ' that existin �:��.:;. g City bonds would have priority over the new issuance, in which case '�re�"` the County might become responsible for the debt service. Joe Barrows, representing 5;,: - Kirchner/Moore, explained that the new issuance would have exactlq the same lien as .F. �i�r:��:7 . � _. � all exi.sting City bonds. '.�� Kinsley then moved £irst reading approval of the resolution subject to the amenctnent �:� to Section 6(F) noted above. Child seconded and the nation passed unanimously. a� �,1 a. ---^------ . k' ;�1�S a. Tom Okan introduced on first reading a resolution levying general property taxes � �:- ';'> Mill for the year 1983, to help defray the costs of governnrent for the County of Pitkin, ;j '' :, Levy �. � s� Colorado, and its road i�rovement districts for the 1984 budget year. The resolution , � � -. * ' identifies the mill levies for the County, Library, Artibulance District, and the four ' ?-�. t_ _;;;;� (4) road i�rovement districts. The levy estatrlished for the County reflects a decrease (,;> ;� ?�: - �''� due to the iration of tk� bus le €�;�„� �xP vy, and to carply with the Home Rule Charter a�:; ;�- requirelrnnt for a reduction during a reassessrt�ent year, The County levy was reduced ' : mills '.;5 from 16,765Jlast year to 12.151 for 1984. ,. �< Madsen then opened the meeting for public comnent. Redstone Ranch Acres resident `.' Byron Donahue requested that the levy for that .i�rovement district not be increased � � beyond the level established last year. Revenues produced by the levy appzoxitnated � ,a: four thousand dollars ($4,000) last yeaz; the district was fornied primarily to provide ��` '� for snaa renaval and ti� cost last , yeaz for such did not exceed two thousand, seven i hundred dollars ($2,70Q). ��' Oken explained that the levy for the district was increased by seven percent (7�) } .. ��i: " Catmissionez's n7eeting _ �-:: i �� . �, �':1,:.�, ' . . � ::�`_�!!� � . ..-... .�.....I�i4�1' '�YNM�.,_.,..ii;..,.._ .+. . . . .__.._..-_t ..._�.`edM^.��/.L.v..>.riwn.r.� ..� .�..i.._ ..r�i:.�.Yt , . �*_�f�,' k;;'•a� r•.fi,.,< I �'I',,, � as authorized by state statute and after soliciting input fx�n the residents of the i ;� district. This seven percent (7�) increase would provide for additional ftu�ds of !j approximate2y two hvndred and seventy dollars ($270). Donahue also requested that the County accept the roads in the subdivision for �, maintenance; the County Engineer has indicated that the County may be able to obtain s r �. �'� � ;y state funding for the maintenance of subdivision roads. i °'' � ' ;� Curt Stewart agreed to refer the acceptance and maintenance issue to the Counfiy :;7 f.�� Engineer, who wou].d report to the Board and the residents accrordingly. �"� Kinsley then moved first reading approval of the resolution, Madsen seconded and .N ;;� ,_� the motion passed unanimously. F ,., �. e `'- ------ - � � �1ST Aiuport Manager Dick Atrold introduced on first reading a proposed amendment to the �;Read: `.:.,:Amend Aitport Rules and Regulations. Specifically, Rocky Mountain Ainuays has requested `',Av-I�ort ' � `�.Reg's an extension of the airport hours of operation to allow for an early morning flight * ' r, � on Saturdays, Sundays and Mondays during the winter season only; the airline has e;_ t,�-; pzoposed an early baggage flight that would arrive in Aspen at 6:10 a.m. on the above ,,� � days, and subsequently depart at 6:20 a.m. Tt�is flight was requested specifically ��,;� y.,, to accanodate baggage, although the airline would apparently have the right to . i;.: ' 4� sell seats on both flights. Arnold ezcplained that the airport could accanodate the ' �;:? early morning flight prwiding such an extension was limit e d to comnerci a l avia tion F; only; he did not fawr the use of the aixport prior to 7:Q0 a.m. by general aviation. .� �: �= He also noted that, in the event the morning curfew was extended, early morning �''�== flights would be peimitted for both Rocky Mountain and Aspen Airaays. -e� t � � �c?•- Rocky Mountain Aitiways District Manager Bill Kelly explained that the requested = _..;. * i'�: flight would only be necessary fran 13 December, 1983, to 31 March, 1984; a single �`- ' ' �r,, �' . , :� morning flight would arrive in Aspen at 6:10 a.m., and depart for Denver at 6:20 a.m. � r g `�-�.` T h i s f l i g h t wo u ld onl y o perate for fort y-sivc (46) da y s this season, and�u1d provide �. � ,� � two thousand, two hundred and eight (2,208) additional seats. Kelly explained that � � Td ,.,,_ thi.s flight was needed to alleviate the weekend baggage build-up at Stapleton Ai.xport; �+ k�::. � �'»3 a substantial amount of baggage is checked through Rocky Motu�tain Aiuways by other ({<�` , ��: i=' �: airlines, many of whose passengers do not fly on Rocky Mountain, which baggage is not � ;�� received fran the major carriers in a timely fashion. As the baggage transported by f the major cazriers does not connect with Rocky Mountain's flights, particu2arly � k'Sr°> during peak season, such acciunulates at Stapleton. Kelly explained that the airline • y� • <�. trucked baggage fran Stapleton to Aspen last year; this method was not considered ; �? appmpriate, however, as it was not as fast and as the passes are fzequently closed �:�. ,��' during [najor storms. �:px '`��' , I4 Nov�bes, 1983 - 10 -. Oamti.ssioner s Meeting ��sL.;'�%�.• ..� . �t '..i7%� � r • -.;{,,^ � � ��r.� � +k _ � s i�- ,�,K��-nih�J ��`S�r r�>�ir��t" r ( �:ii r i.,� r*!_� �S ,�cv�Fr�� ,�.: �w �.�� ^�.�.,. rL*d.^.±k11'.. `.'��J,xYts1...+.,: .. ._a:.-:::. ..,_,.��.± .......'�_:��9Y�,..��a._,sL...'. °��-� �. xx 'at;�'S. _'a..�..:r.i?!��';!.s�... } i�` e s 7 R'- R Kinsley suggested that the airline attertg�t to distinguish between the baggage the !r:'� � airline should be transporting for its ovm passengers and that which is not checked ,.:r'':I for its passengers; this would reduce the amount of baggage to be transported and ';;.-� 4��,°•„ would, perhaps, eliminate the need for an additional flight. Kelly explained that ;•" � � . ti all baggage was tagged identically, and that there was no method to distinguish � i� �. ='�i��` between that which was checked through the airline and that which was not. {'`�' � Kinsley suggested that the airline conduct a baggage flight dising the existing hours t•.+i,: °�`^''' of ration. Kell lained tt�t the earl mornin weekend fli hts were necessary .s;=;;:: °Pe Y�P Y 9 4 �'°r a_: i.�'': XP � 9 99age to Aspen. t_;.,.:: as such would e edite tran rtin the ba s.�._ . €:�ii;`>;:- �rr;;;';, Klanderud noted that, in addition to the baggage, the airline had indicated that the ��i�i�' additional flight would provide additional seats. She noted that these additional ��,_: -- seats may be fully utilized, in which case such would not resolve the baggage problem, ' 7c*ti� � Kelly expZained that vezy few passengezs, if any, were anticipatec3 on the earlp flight � »- _I � ,;! fmn Dem�er to Aspen. The airline has conducted similar flights to Vail for the past :=`' 1 :: five (5) years; there have been very few passengers on these flights and there have !•" �a:,^"'��:': been no ca�laints concerning noise. �,,.t . t � - Klandezvd noted that the airline has scheduled a 7:10 a.m. flight fran Denver to . �,.�.,;�: . a,�„u•� - �.'^`,r�;� Aspen on Saturday's only, and she suggested that the airline conduct such a flight ` oa Sundays and Mondays also in lieu of the early morning flight. Kelly explained �;::i: 'k�'�!-'-'.; that the airlines scheduling department has denied this request as the Dash 7`s have p - � �` been designated for use elsewhere during these times. ''z�.�:"��';'i: :v`.y«�{��'r;:; Madsen suggested that the airline use the Otter craft for a baggage flight during 4,4;�,,,w�` kf _ the existing hours of oepration. Kelly explained that the comm�nity did not support the ' -� the use of this craft, and that such was not as quiet as the Dash 7. _.,.._: � Curt Stewart asked if the additional flight would irtg�act the aisport operations � " c�>` 1 �` budget. Arnold explained that it would not; plowing and maintenance of the runway *t� �':`: - is generally conducted very early in the morning at 2:00 a.m., in which case the �' � facilit could acc.omodate the additional fli ht. �" � Y 9 :` y., L'''n..,.,,,..; t��;;:;�`° Kelly noted that those areas the airline serves peak at different t�mes, and that p,�,.�r.°;: c;:: --��:,.�� ::�. ,��,, the Aspen route generally peaks on weekends. The airline can not provide craft for �x >"- r��, .�c,+�'�i a 7:I0 a.m. flight to Aspen on Sundays and Mondays as tYbere are other areas that ��"^�'`::i s�5,�{.�„� must be serviced during these times. He did not consider trucking an adequate �".�,�`�i:j solution for safety reasons, such as adverse weather conditions and road closures, . •�,�..._z.�.( :�'��c::z:i'.:•- �-��t� and as such would rec��ire flying a driver to Denver, He also noted that the airline rr;;��;.;;�" '� ` >� was not in the trucking business. �r � i � t'"��"'�'�: Child suggested that the aisli.ne contract with a trucking fizm to transport the � �4n_. ._�`,:�i_,:`: '�h�`�.. baggage to Aspen on the days noted. Kelly explained that a crontract with a private ��c��r� �� '�`="`�? Crnmi.ssioner's Meer;*� 14 NovpJnber, 1983 - 11 - �, _ � _ _. :,�,, . . •�� _ . ,q ? L�'�� 4 .��: t '� � 1 .� . J7�Ty1F^ . .-� _ � � A . �(� -.r�,f .. ,; :n4ti.'. :i�+,,°'�`x+r��a.:,��..�.��,.�;�,�:'¢r..�_.._._„�u:,:�6r.r..�r�'�._.�?._�_`�.�ia`�'y:�`.r'�"ss�r�s.Jwa�x...�3.�>:t.,�t`�.;*�r��tL�t h;� �-.::I�.^: -.. .j fittn would cost twice as much as the airline trucking the baggage itself. He then ,l� i� introduced letters in support of the early morning flight submitted by the Aspen ;:S ';,� Flighlands Skiing Coiporation and the Tunberline Condominiwns. �,. Madsen introduced a letter frmn Don Lemos on behalf of several Woody Creek residents. � i� Lemos opposed the early morning f1igY�t for various reasons; the flight pattern used '�•�'.; . :?� by Rocky Mountain Aisways is directly over the Woody Creek area and any additional : � r+ flight would result in greater noise pollution, the tourist would derive no additional �� {^ benefit fran the additional flight as baggage is now tnicked to Aspen in a timely j� �; fashion, and it was considered more cost effective to continue to truck such baggage x i_� '� as the roads are rarely closed whereas the airport frequently is. Lemos also noted l� that the additional flight has already been published in the AOG as a regular passenger h flight and not as a baggage flight; he was concerned that such was representative of ! � �� an indi.rect atte�t to erode the ai.rport curfew. B ' � Kelly explained that fliqhts are published in the AOG at least one (1) year prior to 9 ` € � operation and that, in this instance, the early rtarning flight was scheduled in � � anticipation of County apprwal. Kelly was concasned that the subject flight was � '` identified prior to Board approval. He noted that a survey was conducted during the • � �.. , � past three (3) years on co�laints of tourists with respect to baggage; the rnmiber of tourists that have ca�lained about baggage has increased fran twenty-two percent ,;v', �. (22$) in 1979 to twenty-seven percent (27�) i.n 1982. The early morning flight would allow the airline to better service its passengers. George Laswell, general manager of the Aspen Square Condomini�ans, supported the � ' additional flight. Laswell noted that the biggest c�laint in the lodging business " concerned baggage and he requested that the Board assist in solving thi.s problem. � •" � Setty Farson, representi.ng Aspen Central Reservations, also supported.the'_flight � � requested by Rocky Mountain Aitways. Farson, although concerned with the noise i�acts � associated with such a fli ht felt that the cartrninit should ' rove its ima e �' 9 . Y � 9 �:.. � with the tourists. �'� �S: �;•'�;> �. An unidentified individual questioned the need for an additional flight; it was not � lmown, for instance, why the airline could not accomodate its passengers and baggage i ` simaltaneously. �� Arnold explained that it was necessasy to allow for two (2) hours between flights to accamdate the transfer of baggage fran one (1) airline to another. The major � carriers frequently connect with the local airlines, such as Rocky Mountain Aizways, in less time than this, such so that baggage is not accanodated and it acciunulates in Denver. Arnold felt that Stapleton Arport and its method of handling baggage was primarily at fault, noting that this problem would be further exacerbated as the f � OCtmq.ssioner's Meetin.� 14 November, 1983 - 12 t,r>,�� 'd t ,, .-yi,t ' • �p'M . . (r ��`� • �:! t.}h � 4Y�� ,F ' "`"' /'�': � � r ti ��i�r�n S�a�,ti��,}�x� r�� .� � •�� ra .�r �� `s �� r f . '� � ' ��,�'3�'Z`r`�i_ 3��.h�..� 1 ( tt r rk rr �{��.. . ' k� ` � �• . J� `� -jt Yjt�e.1 �. c 4 " L - � � ti- � s l°'�s a ' �ar if;� 4'ir _��,r'�t' r ��i 1.: _>:4f„4§"i`tti..s.�''s��,,1'(w .afM-,._. � ,J{j d�._...�.�_'�15` _'_._. s�t..3_._.__._ :�.�K.`_'.Y�{ 41'y yg k:�}Y.. , _.t v � � t � �i�. �� '•"= i baggage area for both Rocky Mountain and Aspen Aixways would be reconstructed this ;': i ;;_;,'j winter. He also noted that Rocky Mountain Ainvays has i�lemented a different market 1 _;� approach than that utilized by Aspen Aisways; the latter increases the rnmiber of ' i r•:'r i • �k�" ` flights to Aspen on weekends and can alleviate the baggage problem at the end of each {._^.� �, . `s�;?'; day, whereas the former does not provide for any additional flights during tku.s period. %:� :' :_;,.,., � .. , a�.`:` Ki.nsle althou h concerned with the ba y, g ggage build-up in Denver, felt that the f�;�; i.ssue could be resolved without the early morning £light requested by the airline. �:. �e;;<'j °�`� The flight would adversely i.�act several residents, particularly those situated •�`� within the flight path, during the early morning hours on non-working days. It was Ei`.5.,��: ��ri.v felt that baggage could be trucked from Denver to Aspen efficiently, the cost of which ��; ��>1 could be reflected in the price of an airline ticket. He also suggested that the airline J✓-±: :�:' review its scheduli.ng priorities; an additional flight during the existing hours of 4T_.;- - �. opez-ation, for instance, could serve to alleviate the problem. He then moved to deny t ;, � Rocky Mountain Aiiway's request to amend the Aisport Rules and Regulations on first �:`;'�3 s''�'; reading. Klanderud seconded, noting that, although the baggage issue was considered a i:,::`� n:�':''� problem, the early morning flight was not considered the solution. �,;:;2 �,::..°� Blake agreed that the baggage build-up was a problem that should be addressed so ;�-= '�?ii' as to enhance the quality of the tourist experience; he was not convinced, however, that the early moming flight proposed was the best method to address such, � ��„;' Child also indicated that he c,rould not support the eazly morning flight; he noted �`�� that the traditional Saturday to Saturday bookings may contribute to the build-up, �'£°~ and suggested that this be reviewed. .,y�, �='� . �� The motion initiated by Kinsley passed with opposition fran Madsen, who, although ��::. ;�;;:' not supportive of the request, felt that a public hearing on the issue should be convened. � . ---------- k '. ��:�� :'' �;;: ;;.�i;>' �:,:.`; r,�:. Colo Richard Perske, Colorado Depaztment af HigYwaays District Engineer, introcluced a h H�, � ^�tc Dept five (5) year higriway improvement program adopted by the State Highway Cannission for 1 '. `�` Plan �LynF� �;^' the years 1984 - 1988. Those itens scheduled for Pitkin County, designated primarily _:�' �,� for State Highway 82, have been prioritized as follows: �` - the realigrnnent and widening of the Phillips Curves, estimated to cost approximately ^��*� one million, two hundred thousand dollars ($1,200,000) ��. � - the replacgt�ent of the guardrail at Shale Bluffs, estimated at a cost of eighty i� thousand dollars ($80,000) �� - irtg�rovements to the intersection at E1 Jebel, at an estimated cost of three hundred rt ;,G F xFy sixty thousand dollars ($360,000) - the channelization of the Woody Creek Road, at an estimated cost of three hundred and z�' forty thousand dollars ($340,000) �: �;' - the purchase of right-of-way for the relocation of the Highway at 9asalt, at an estimated cost of one million dollars ($1,000,000) ..x .� Perske explained that the above improva�nents were prioritized as requested by the � �`' tri-county camiittee, and were funded for irtglementation in 1984. The Phillips Curves `�{ 4;�, i';"-� Crnmissioner's Meeting 14 Nov�nber, 1983 - 13 r°:=.• � � - - - --_ . __.__ _.�...�...�. .. �� _ ____.� � i 1"r i � ,j � t" '4 ; i� "�'{t 59�j}��w ix S t tr � �j�"� r �� -� Yt .i�J,. �.�� -d' :ti�� j��,,"4s. ti . :� t i,- Nslfl�f�r;ni``4Ya�,,faf��c� ��u,i��^'�ir +.:4 '° t , y�;� '�t �"3�k�. o�+¢ ;�r��'"�a71: ' �:. ��x�:r,s...K�.'Sl�'Y'n�.Y�RTP9.M.�M�t�.v�._..1 .. .. ...ai�+.J_..�_��v��._._�.--..+d�..�aur.'�.ri� ........�, f.. ... . ��__3 ...` .. , � �z� ! � f . i �::i project, which has already been submitted to consultants, includes a forty (40) foot i}; '_.i asphalt sisface and sane realigrmient work; these it[g�rov�nents would not eLiminate any 1�-� of the curves but would soften them sanewhat. Construction has been scheduled for Suly ' ' �.I � �.T7 �� of 1984, and it was anticipated that the project would be ca�leted by late fall. ,,� The Shale Bluffs project includes the replacement of the guardrail to close existing :',� t�. .. ;'�'' gaps, the application of fill and other iaq�rovements. The i�rovements at E1 Jebel : .�.� vrould provide for acceleration/decelleration lanes and have been scheduled for �� construction during late stamier/early fall. The Woody Creek Road project would prwide Y� for wideniny and the ct�annelization of the intersection of the �per Road. Right-o£- s; ,� way acqr�icition £or the highway relocation project at Basalt would be achieved in two ":,�� (2) phases; the funds appropriated for next year would be used for acqui.sitions fran {� Holland Hil]s to the Basalt town line, whereas the re�nai.nder of the acquisitions have � - `` i'� been scheduled for 1985. Construction of the bypass itself would occur in subsequent � :i � years, and would first be i�lemented as a two (2) lane project, i3 f� 7nq�rovements sch�duled for 1985 include the follaaing: :'y �M �at - channelization for the KOA canpground, at an estimated cost of one hundred and eighty �� thousand dollars ($180,000) ,,� - the reconstruction and widening of the railroad crossing, estimated to cost three :� fimdred thousand dollars ($300,OOQ) J'� - channelization at Owl Creek Road at a cost of tvro h�dred thousand dollars ($200,000) jc - the extension of the box culvert at Owl Creek I2oad at a cost of one hundred thousand "u' yY 1 . "� C20�.13I'$ �$10��0�0� - A'a � - the installation of a guardrail in the Snowrnass Canyon, at an estimated cost o£ one hundred and ninety thousand dollars ($190,000) - improvanents to the Gerbaz Curve, including the widening of the curve and the •' �� installation of a guardrail, at a cost of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) ' ,� `Phe various improvements to be implemented during the years 1984 and 1985 approximate �;. 42 ! . � five million dollars ($5,000,000), a figure which includes engineering and unanticipated �'`, $:.., � cost overruns. A total of approximately eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) has been : ,� ;� appropriated for highway i�rovements during the five (5) year period for Pitkin County, � '�. ' �.: , �4 � • . approximately one third (1/3) of the total District budget of thirty-one million � �:::.,:..:`' . ;,� dollars ($31,000,000). � � C � The^joint City Council - Boazd of County Comnissioners meeting was convened. Those ' �_� ' i present included Counci]meni�ers Bill StirLing, Chic Collins, Charlotte Walls, and A1 Blanquist, and Boasd menl�ers Madsen, Blake, Klanderud and Child. . gus Finance Director Tan Oken introduced discussion on the bus bonds to be issued by Bonds Lease the County for the purpose of acquiring buses and necessazy bus maintenance and ti: Agree b; storage facilities. The Board earlier approved, on first reading, a resolution authorizing a bond issuance in the principal �rount of one million, five hundred ? thousand dollars ($1,500,000) and approving a lease agreement with the City of Aspen � �`. j� Catmissioner's Meeting 19 November, 1983 - 14 i __... �.�...�.�.,.,:,,,,.�. , _ '<✓;;. ,�, � _ �!' � � �5�� z.� �r ' � s- �P . l t�i.'4 '("1' �i y 3 y�, , '.t^n �" :Y {'{,;^ ti.a'Xe �s� �?y ��'{,� � t . . ' i i i a Sf�h' 1' y�,ri7• � ��{ 1 C.f ia r � I . h " � p. '._�'<5�y (^f �fi . � r �7f 12 y,cv t'�a �„3 A .C1F� F Al� tF x ��` �i k �1 > i° > f r `f •{ ` � , : Ep a ..,i<a `4 . .e.^�t �- .�� :. � ti 'la�j� �,�1k(r< Y �S '�'> -.i`,� r'�. S -'� ��,�f� I r�...s� .�� n < � r J�.$ �, .� _ , ' ... � �...�a.�t �c�et� "!��Y'Wku.u�•��_,�:r5-i��l�:'�%k .�..x!*Y.':1'.�x+.;7. ..._......s .... ... ,...` . .,. . . :. � � ' d �:_.'_:::-4 +;+ . � to secure payment of the bonds. Oken explained that Kirchner/Moore and E.F. Hutton ..::t� ,�a=;;'._ � have cc�mitted to purchase the bonds at a net effective interest rate of eight and . ;p a ;�;;:�' �' sixty-seven one h�dredths percent (S.67$). The underwriters have schedul.ed the i` � j "'. '�;''�:�� closing of the bonds for 30 Decembea-, 1983, to cor�ly with the required forty-five � ' i;..'.-;�f F.;;. r� '�� ' iT. :.� (45) day referendwn period. A lease agreement between the City and the Co�ty, to 4 pxf:.. �� A a secure theis payment, must be approved by UMTA and executed by the two (2) parties ,+,T;;,_ .. fr=�;-': u^ prior to closing. Execution of the lease by Council should be acccx[q�lished by ordinance �:;,::�;�'_ °�'�'':' on two (2) readings. 3:F:, �-�,,.r:: "� Oken noted that the bond issuance was originally set at one million, three hundred �;:. �`�:w: and fifty thousand dollars ($1,350,000); the issuance was subsequently increased by �x � one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) to provide the Transit Board with r._->,: i'��;�:� . `�� a contingency during its first year of operations. This contingency was wnsidered - ��:� ' sc necessary in the event sales tax revenues decrease this winter due to poor snowfall, ��i,�.;. and to provide sufficient funds should the Aspen Skii.ng Cmipany decline to fund the v_ ;,;��. buy-out for the Bluebird buses. � ��%,� Stirling asked if the City's seventh penny tax wou].d provide suf£icient revenue to '��,„'^ i�'-^ to pay the debt service costs of the bonds. City Manager Wayne Chapcnan explained that . e:�� Y::- the tax would provide sufficient revenue. i' Dwight Shellrtr�n e�ressed some concern that bonds would be issued prior to the �r`:,;`, finalization of the Transit Agency's budget and operations; Shellman has not reviewed, k=�", °; �,�;� for instance, a final budget for transit operations, a contract with the Skiing ; ';��;<, ° 'v,,'. �� Co�any, or final plans for the bus maintenance facility. Shellman noted that it was f r � + • difficult for the public to cam�ent on the issuance in the a6sence of an overall � r E - program for Y1ie Agency. � ` Y � - r '� Klanderud explained that none of the above doc�nnents were in final form at this � F -. a�:::_� �..,.:• : :>,, time; negoti2tions with the Skiing Canpany have not been concluded, and a final rt : :. � � � f� � budget for the Agency has not been drafted or approved. Klanderud noted that the � , ,;`z,:; ;,.` : �,�;^ bond issuance should be distinguished fran the budget for the Agency; the proceeds -��. Y�� fran the bond i.ssuance were fairly specific, and were intended prunarily to fund the i�s '?�� local share of the UMTA grant for the sixteen (15) new buses and the bus maintenance �-F ;;, facility. ��r�,, Shellman noted that the bonds would provide approximately five hundred thousand �,i^ t� dollars ($500,000) for the local share of the buses alone. He understood that ten (10) a of the new buses, however, may not be necessary, and he understood that ten (10) of �k the buses would be used to serve the Skiing Ca�any. a z;; Klanderud explained that the policy decision to purchase sixteen (lb) buses was ��, made two (2) or three (3) years ago, the need for which was based upon various factors t;�� ..�; �:;"t , � � .�.� ... �.�. _ ., '�,' . . :�b . ` . ..�y;w� �r i�N � .. � ,, { � �.. �4 �J. -., i-y% y� � � s �.!•j*.'. - � r1 ,+,fC x� ';��r ?"�4 r � �a . `• l�l :F< r t} t.: � 3,�r�, j.;M� �icfr �i � {,•� ��'�t1 IL� aa��r�h4" ��'-c'Y4'' 1,. k"S�f;� r" �� r.� a�i f 1 9..� '� f �� $,,�4''t t� r��?.� - . y ,t"'� 5 .r Zr rr � ,ei+�i)a.�i 7',-.`t F:"'.�.�xkCf'a„��w��.�2'�•.,, ..`...��_. .:L ��.S.a.^�u��-.�a .°V�.�'�'" '.t.G,c�.+.;l:y_f> � r" .L.:e . � � `•'F '` ., 3 4 P, 4 9 4�P�nt, and others. The Nt.; � includin ridershi the condition and a e of existin e �;;,; '��;'-f specific nianber of vehicles necessary for transit aperations was established and ;'"�<� � ["'��,_':# justified to the satisfaction of both local and federal agencies. She also noted that • lr,,. t 5• �� ,-� f _ the Transit Board has not yet agreed that ten (10) of the new buses would be designated x. for use on the Skiing Co�any routes. y....�' t�= c � �r'; Transportation Grants Administrator Mike Slugocki explained that twelve (12) of the � ;....,. �"�` new buses were replacgnent vehicles; eight (8) City buses and four (4) County buses l�:�: �f" would be sold, the sale of which has been calculated in and deducted fmm the [7MTA 3;�ts �'%. 3�;��:: 9rant. i:ar'' %�:" Shellman felt that the Transit A en bud et, the Skiin C ?,-�.;; 9 �Y 4 4 a�any crontract, and others, �_� �.�r; should be finalized prior to authorizing the bond issuance. He also noted that the ��t: �' contingency fund for the Agency, to be provided from the bond proceeds, has not been _ <;�r_ discussed before today. He expressed some concern that such a contingency may not � n';� be a proper use of the bond proceeds. f��,:`� ; ,� Assistant City Manager Ron Mitchell explained that a second draft of the Skiing � ' Ca�any contract has been prepared and was available for review. Transit Agency i' ``�� Director Gre P e� Y j;�;; g Fitz atrick lained that this draft was recentl submitted to the ::a. . �.,..-p ' �'�-" g Cortq� y xpected that it would be available to the public r:;,,,.,:, Skiin an for review, and he e f.-- ` by early next week. �i"� ;"w;�; As n Times editor Bil Dunaway questioned the legality of the conti.ngency fund �'�'�; given the wording of the ballot question that authorized the bonds. 3i: 'v=" Oken explained that the contingency f�d would not be established fran the bond } �;�.w- : �,;":�: � r„�.;� proceeds; all bond proceeds would be limited to disect capital �mprovements only. �., ;.:.:.;- F��:��... ; {` The contingency ftmd, which has actually been established at one hundred and thirteen � thousand, thirty 3ollars ($113,030), would be established with a portion of the � Fy� � x ' County's share of the local match. A portion of the bond proceeds would be used � �� 3 to fund a portion of the County's local share, resulting in the availability of � ; ` . t=•-- one himdred and thirteen thousand, thirt dollars ($113,030) of Counc funds for the F��=� '.� Y Y e'•.,:: ,�;; 1, .. . ;,�.`� :�a� contingency. ;.' i.=. f=:�CY, � � Stirling also expressed sane concern that the contingency fund may not be an '�`-', � �}� appropriate use of the bond proceeds. He noted that the fund was intended to provide k�',�7- � � recourse in the event of poor snowfall; in the event a contingency was not established, a the only recourse available to the Agency would be a reduction in services. i�;,:: ��v,' Shellman suggested that both goverrunents defer the issuance to a later date; it was ik�'6�rl.. � �!}�1��. suggested that such be addressed once consolidation has occurred and some history 'i4 �• on the process has been estabZished. Blomquist felt that the sequence of events that led to consolidation of the transit ;�; :•; �. d;��; i�i.-.: aam�issioner's Meeting 14 NovemUer, 1983 - 16 i'- i _.. < :,= . - ,•,f�Ar .� ' �,, . U .� '; ��S�y � Y �5 � �.� i; �n�. . � +�i��4°h� ��eVr °t�D F�y�M1 r.� �� tx F .!k C� �� F�,x itf 'it ' �� . y�� t��,�,�r�f:�. -. � a� �'�C��S��}�'�cTy i. Ytr�,C5F� `�_.QF SV3 t � `� c r,>y.?,U k 4d �� i f„.P�kr�>xt��s�� , ia 1,�+� "l x-, i i i.rt. ,� . � J3'{`�y�,�i�,°,��N��S-�CdRYttw�.�.�..�w�M 1„{.,�"t'41 t+F"'•�.seis£xf_��........i.._..�f.':J . . ._.,. ��.._�+.� �.w.. ..._t..� � . � �. � �}1 �''2 :;��.� departments, and the level of service the new Agency would provide, should be made �,i 5 ;i::� available ta the Council and the public. !>.i:� . ? Klanderud explained that the `IYansit Agency Boazd consists of five (5) merrbers, two � �k_9 � (2) of which are elected officials. Transit Board aieetings are conducted openly, �-S ;� and the entire consolidation process was achieved in public meetings of the Board and � �;� Council. A budget for the Agency has not been adopted, and a contract with the Skiing }. 7' u�', Ca�any has not been finalized, all of which has been discussed during the meetings of ' i �� the Agency. Klandenad explained that the tu.story of consolidation, service levels � �� i.� � ��,� and other inforn�ation was available to the public. ;�� ---------- r°� Ruedi Environrt�ental Coordinator Mark Eliller introduced discussion on the Requests for - .,:� Hy3ro �,�;� Project Proposals for the Ruedi Hydropower Project. Nane (9) bids for the project were sulMtu.tted - � and subsequently reviewed by the consulting fixm Sheaffer and Roland; the bids were of yy;� e�ccell.ent quality, and each demonstrated interest in finance, design/construetion, t�,��;;1 ?:, operation, maintenance and replacement of the project. The two (2) most canpetitive i,,.. j;; bids were submitted by General Electric and Western States Constnaction; the proposal L..'. sutxnitted by General Electric, however, was considered the most superior in teLms of . ^k . ;,_� cost and other factors. This proposal identified a budget of two million, nine hundred :v �; i. thousand dollazs ($2,900,000) for the design and wnstruction of a 5 megawatt system, - �} substantially less than the four million dollar ($4,000,000} budget pre�iously drafted �`_ for a 3.2 megawatt system. 'i> � �,� Flil,ler recam�ened, as did Sheaffer and Roland, that the Board and Council enter }": 4:. �';: ' !? into contract negotiations with General Electric ium�ediately, and return al.l. other � '+• bid bonds with the exception of Western States Constzuction. Negotiations would address � . ri; the specifics of design and constructi.on work, the hiring of local contractors, site- ^�-.'. -. `" yF� � specific enviroiunental impacts, perforniance standards and guarantees, and others. It ,� a t-� !� was anticipated that a final contract vrould be prepared for approval by the Board and ^ ' :.; �_,.' - X' - Council in December. t•.-��-� � L Pat Hunter, representing Hunter Construction, did not feel that the bid submitted i; by that fism was given sufficient consideration. He requested that he be pmvided an opportunity to discuss the speci.fics of his bi.d with the staff. The Board and Council generally agreed to retain the bid bonds of General Electric, Western States Construction � '��ad and Hunter Constxuction, and to allow the latter to discuss the specifics of its bid with staff. � Child noted that the two million, nine hundred thousand dollar ($2,900,000) bid submitted by General Electric was the laaest bid received; this bid, haaever, was approximately five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) less than some of tt�e other �'� 14 NovgnUer, 1983 - 17 ? Cannissioner's Meetiri9 f i � _-�--- �� ;,, �:a;,µ .� .. � r,_ � k}.?. � �5�� r�Y� � y: r�` ! �f +'p�' �+�f I�� ,�,,� ��i t.�:. �1. i n �h r � i2.!' ' ��:� �s .�"" �'S� :t��irgwiFc'E��!1}7"�Y �Fe{ ir �4 r d�„Pl.t t "��F°4� r -ta� � �' L�M��.�,�_3 k„�u�r,��!.-, . � �`.,, . !l t � " A � � �� T 6 � � ..+A°'7�w"�., .�`S�rt�l�';R4�S'}�* r'�'. ,r._ �t ,�:t -�, ti'e �,.. A7�M( r t`�� +kr -rz,.t � r..- . arm�a++rn...a.;::rt.�.w:...C:��i°.�.��..� _�+t.w:.:>r.r..,.�?_..:L ._._...__. ... . .. . _. � � �,:. _j bids, and thexe was some concern that the General Electric proposal may result in cost i:-.: 5�'i�:��- � . - overruns at some point in future. fUller explained that negotiations with General Electric would focus on this issue, �' „Y�...' t,'. : �fi�� 5 P y ponsible for cost ovemu�s, and others. �s. includin which art would be res � �.�`,'��-`: �`;." ,::.__;. �.:.'.:. '""'' Stirling asked if there were any stre�ns that feed �nto Ruedi Reservoir which might �=;r._' s-f �''' '' '`` jeopardize the Ruedi facility in the event their water rights were sold. Eluller was ��:�: ��;'= not aware of any such scenario that would imperil the feasibility of the hydro project. i`°4t �-;�. ��;;; Child then moved to authorize the staff to enter into contract negotiations with M.'. �''�� General Electric for the Ruedi Hydropower Project. Stirling seconded and the motion i.;:;.; ;�>-z �:�i:=: u�.�; passed unanimously. The motion pertained to hoth the Board and CounciL ��=_. +�":- The joint meeting was subsequently adjourned. jYr,r' �f� -------^-- _ � 2[9D The Board reconvened to consider on second reading a resolution to contract a Read: �`' Bus special and limited revenue obligation of Pitkin County, Colorado, by issuing its ;.. Bonds �_" sales tax revenue bonds, Series 1983 in the aggregate principal amount of one million, a:;:: `'`' fiue hw�dred thousand dollars ($1,500,D00), for the ose of a G:'= purp cquiring buses and i 1,� °-'" necessary bus maintenance and storage facilities, funding reserves and paying costs 4:; i'E� of issuance; prescribing the form of said bonds; providing for the application of .::, certain sales taxes to a the debt service thereon; °p �;.� P Y prescribing other details �'", concerning said bonds, including, but not limited to, covenants and ac,�eements in .� �d ''� �,` connection therewith; appointing a trustee and paying agent; appmving the form and �; `' execution and delivery of a lease agreement with the City of Aspen, Colorado, relating y � : �;� to the properties financed with the proceeds of said bonds• establishin a Count �_'�' �. , 9 Y tr - Capital Irtq�mvement Trust l�luid and guidelines thesefor; and repealing all resolutions � %- in conflict herewith. Oken lained that the resolution was �" ,' � apprwed on first reading r � � earlier in the day subject to an amendnent to Section 6(F}; that atrenc�nent, cited in 4 � $ its entirety during fisst reacling, would allow the Co�ty to increase payments to the °� 'r� �`:r•?_:_ �. � � � City of Aspen for mall maintenance purposes. � Blake maved approval of the resolution on semnd reading and Klanderud seoonded. `� Rvight She1L�n asked when the payments must be made for the new buses. Oken � explai.ned that the County was i.n the process of taking delivery of the buses at th;� time, and that the first five (5) vehicles would be delivered within the week, Once available, the County must take delivery within thirty (30) days and must pay for the vehicles twenty-one (21) days subsequent to this. Shel]man requested that the Agency provide an overall operating plan that would be available for public review. He also requested that the Transit Agency be organized as a sesvice entity only, rather than an independent agency, with which both the � Ccmnissioner's Meeting 14 Nove�-r, 1983 - 18 � - Vl -.:i?�r''� � . '�;f��n:�s.. , - '�! q. �� 1.T 2 .�T'�[..hs k_,� �` .r ` 1 . - I rv�,`�K^�5, f ��` �r6�� `"r . �i� i-� i'� $'Z rF�' x, `+ T'4� y.J� -:. a ; a� �+t,"�P �.- ,'? Y .��7��1� �i .a�� J �sv r , �,a,} IkF f �U2.�+;[t i �k f�s n .` lh+r tei � �;rY�r Y�'��o�,��V�� (F.�t r��'��'4��J��d�w�h73 �h�M��i.Y. �5�, ��s. 4�i.f k��f'�'�t � �:' i l n . s� SA K r; .'t�� 1 r,Y�w � p�� ` :d � i �� t�' !'.L� ...:�'t.._�. ,Y— ".:�_a.'.i`YS�+ , k �•.�.�ii'.s§aS!^as' � e' t �'� 7 a3a ... .;.. r hY�.,?'r � � �� ' �� s�.i.,�.�.W�,.a;.� ..r� �r y„.... 'ki3t.<� ..X:'t'r rs.y.•f;'4� . -_ .� I" iq,;: �?-��:`:` City and Cotmty would contract for transportation services. �§`, ;.. ; --� Klanderud explained that the Agency's aperating budget and all capital i�roverents tx�=<:;;:- "��`�'�ti;;;:; must be approved by the Board and Council, and that the service plan must be presented t �. i ,��::'.�` during a public hearing by the Agency. These re[n�irgnents were considered sufficient � �,� :... �, ,�'� safeguards to allow for public input. �' ',a;; : ��'�'4`` The motion initiated by Blake passed unanimously, h i'.'��`'� _ w,;."''� r,�._. ---------- ��_;_'',.� :�_�_�'�� 7-;Y`��,;-' 2ND �n Oken introduced on second and final readi.ng a resolution levying general property Z"�;�='`�`s�' R2dC1: ;�� ; Mill taxes for the year 1983, to help defray the costs of government for the County oE r`�v5,�,�; Levy s„'"�r;�: Pitkin, Colorado, and its road i�provelnent districts for the 1984 budget year. Oken d`'f ��'-�� _ �,,, explained that the resolution has been amended since first readi.ng; at the request of F.J',i � � . : Byron Donahue, a resident of the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision, the mill levy for �,.,', � `� ?� that district has been zeduced to the same level established last year, or 9.075 � ,�, ,.� � � ;1 mills. The amenc§�ient, less restrictive than that approved on first reading, would not � , ,•� t -a r '�il�-n�' necessitate a third readin . n,,,;.. ,-_ 5 ��„�: U;`t*{ � �r��,". Child moved approval of the resolution on second and final readi.ng subject to a . �*�•.r...�.,., . ,{�; ky� __�,.,; IEdllCt10R in the mill levy fdr the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision as noted by Oken. ��y;; ' �`=��+� Klandezud seconded and the motion passed with opposition from Blake. , .: ; . `=-1<,- ,_::> ---------- .,-.�;4 � `��• There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. ....r...y,,:: . � } ` L �ti ; �t r�_;"rr.,t ---------- Y¢t'�� F "�`�� }1 rt. U � �� F� �. � �5 `"iFk_ . � '��.. J4aa 3..' �.. . ��.��= Respectfully S mi� ted. APPFtOVBD: �"� ��< � = i �, ��,w-_�4_:, i t�w 4,;:.U_:,R -----, ': �ix�.��, i ,' - x: . . a�th��,'`�'= /� /(.i ' ��a i ,.��-v',�� .'�" / ' --� �' �,��'; Deputy Co " Clerk o dsen, Chairn�� En�F , �b 3 :±'A� y �^��. :r `�:!"<P� k��pA sS ti 2,... :�.;.. . �3 a .�� i�'��'��