HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.con.060.1983 _ ..�.�+ii
�,,
'k.t'�.;.'rLi:I;, �
_ _ ,r�'
.y F . .. .. �r� .
.. � � s.w3°"�lt�1T,x4�li i ''FC�� �_,tii�."t AV ,� -.._ u �t��t;�y,,,1�na1� '
..r�z?�:.b�.. _. ���....±h+7G:�'�.��,�,�..f.^14�.�r ��`' •�+�cr`'.�1+i7.�SP»,�tx+„;��
P%; .
� ADDENDUM AND RENEWAL
�'��" T^HANGAR USE AND LEASE AGREEMENT
�;.,; .
��-';;. CA 60(83)
'i`:;'
.t;,,.
;:��;., THE FOREGDING Use and Lease Agreement, by and between the
i ir�_�'� `' ,
;'r%"' BOARD OF COUNTY COM.MISSIONERS OF PITKIN COI3NTY, COLORP.DO, and '�'
�a � ^
+-, ��7�"2 �J��31'�iC,�b/ct �Ufk`�'SC�i�.s hereby renewed for a
�.; r`=�::
�,,., period of one (1) year, commencing on August 1, 1983, and �
#�s
�-y :� terminating on Jvly 31, 1984, with the following changes:
F�'�"
i•.y�-,,
1•r4'..;:'
'��"� 1. Paragraph 1.01 "Lettinq of Exclusive,_Non-Exclusive and
:s�,:�: -
f�~-
f�,��.
zi�^�� Storage Areas and Rental Rates", Page Two, Lines 6 and 7, shall
�`
��''T'' be amended to read as follows: ...The T-Hangar area is hereby
�=:%' �.
w.-:
�'�=` leased for $190.00 $
�._� per manth with said monthly payment of I90.40
i--_;-n;
�iY-�, :
payable in advance...". �
a ��,=
r�,,.�':
j
gr�,' 2. Paragraph 2.05 "Insurance", Page 7, Lines 4-6, shall be
w"'?�'':;,.
i,�:;`4: amended to read as follows: ...but with limits of not less
�`�':'`,'.
C:;;;_.:,.;; than $1,000,0OO.Oq Combined Single Limit Praperty Dame,qe and ;
� ; .
ti?�:�":� `
r�:�s� Bodily Injury each occurrence...". '
��:�»:
.;:h�:
--�:s 3
,,_` BOARD OF COUNTY COtMiISSIONERS OF ;
•�,',-:;;` PITKIN COON'1`Y., COL. DU ;
xr'�;z:' i
� �,' AT � 1
� .
��e: C
:}`�-:;;, Bp°
���� Ge9"ge M� s n, Chairman
� ,, ;
,+ : LF$SEE:
� :
t,� o,, l� '^�r� ` .� r�.
�.,' ATTEST: �
J BY� � �
� ' - vyv��.e-e /La.e! � r�S
s� l ° � addzess
f i' �aZ5- 3�F/8 vi .3� 9
" APPROVED AS TO FORM �
�:Y^: phone number ;.:`.�
��:�' � :•:
r
es ey Li ht, Co y A orney �
I
i
.3� -
�:
•'J�
���; �
.«;f
�?A
�ZF�•J..
��`�' .
i
�
��:
� f
��
4'��.
E(�.�r,�:e�
( •��
��T:':..-�•
1'•
, ,
.a�r.,�' . , .
,".rt�� ,�.
i
Y �i
.. , 2 �tr ,�' �y��„�; �i "� �}� t �t4� q„�tti:
e y}4 i i s . � x v,�9� +��vi�r,.-; n 5 * ��
sn. "^.T G .M�� h�, �r�'� 1 e 1�y � xt ��t�4 t u t J4rP
s9�t''�`�e�� �,��-�"'"F�1` ��h�,Mr{�{i�G C��(i'� `3 X�r,�fr,�i{{ � �� j� ��sr�r��a'{•r
_ .S�"+�'ta'"rw.'�s��+7�.�1�w.��j� � '4 ,'�y1 .y ;�y ��. t ...te�..��lu�4l+7rM. . 'rc,.: _ ._. x..:::.s.t�.4`n��'�t...`��.;�^.�..,� ,�ti��,�,'�.
� , Y '1'1[li PI'fICT:N COUNTY YLAN
;�
�I1;�:;��:' POR ALTL:1tNATIVG5 'f0 OUT-OF-HOML•' PLACG1�11:NT
x4'�
�,1:�.:. 19II3 - 1984 �
� :
l''
�,� �� This CounCy I'lan has been developed by the Pitkin County
``'� Placemen� Al�ernatives Commission which includes the following
�Y� membcrs: -
s.-�w;
i�:� i�tc�lly I;aph:.ie:l - Team Leader, Aspen 1�tenL'al Health Clinic
,� �4:.uk Lowley - Therapisl', Aspen itental Heall'h Clinic
��� Ann Gnowlton . - DirecL'or, Community Health Services
��Y hlike Schultz - DirecL'or, Department of Social Services �
� Nancy Itarsh - Aspen School llistrict I2�-1 �
���' SCeve L'arnett - Private Pediatrician, Aspen, CO
I
� Ly�la Smil'h - Aspen Developmental Center
�`� P•.d Creenleaf - Social Worker, Department of 5ocial Services
�'"`: Debbie Quinn - PrivaLe Attorney, Aspen, CO '
�
��, Jill Jordan - Conu�iunil'y School, Aspen, CO j
i�� Jane Shinn - Pediatric Nurse, Aspen, CO � .
� 1.'recl Gannett - Pi.ticiii Counl'y Sheriff -
��'; llelen Palmer - Piticin Co�mty Librarian , ;
';' 13arb 'ParbeL - Counselor, Asgen High School ;
SL'eve Duley - Scl�ool PsychologisC, Aspen School District, R�-1 i
-'::�'��' Jay Kcnis - PrivaCe Recreational Therapist, Aspen, CO �
.'i% .. '
.`� The PAC �members are also members of the Cliild Protection Team. i
�;�?_ IC is fe1C ChaC Chis group has both a unique view and dedication ,
�`:* �o children in 1'itkin County. � _
„�.: ,
'v The periocl Co Ue coverecl Uy Lhis plan is .Tuly 1, 1933, to
�?�
:' June 30, 19u4. �
,;.�
` .r� The signaCures Ue1ow affirm that this plan has been developed by � `
� x,:::
Lhe Ylacement Alternatives Conunission and approved by the County ;
_ Commzssioners. j
t
�
�:
,�
George M�dsen Nancy [�arsh
�k Chairman, Goar.d ot Chairperson, Placement
� County Commissioners Alternatives Commission
$'
`
�. -
n /�
, • P1il��u z
` Chairman, Depart❑ nL' of �'
� Social Services �"
}y �:
� :
��. .
!
t` �
..•���.����.��.:..��:_x,...........,....r. _--- _____s.._ .�-.$
�� • . � ''
`r„��� ,
, iyj�n. ' . � . ' � . � .
:,�u . . . � ., . ._ � _
��y� ' . - . . � . . .
m 'J
. �1:��� . � . .. .
, . I
`�M �
:; q.
i��a� •+t
T:_^ '�
�:.� ' FiJ
., �
.:,7�x,"' • '
:�:.•��T�-�
�.y��; .1� ,ql.
�SM
, � � ,. ' � . , . .
0 L�r t '``'.Z�r. 4 ''`"„�;� f ���+"n!;,
{µ a.z��s�-���'�5,��"'i.� „��+'rc., •. �i.w ,V�..� � 1 �,� �'S},� ! ��t�,+S� 7 �t7�,S i
�y.��.�y+� �M r.{��' � F-.� x ke '�•:F ♦,�t }� 1�K�d�+ .�t S��h`yc ti . C i`f'� �"t�t�„�,�f y�.�''''9F ' .�.t
.. �-�?�3�..r�.c�'u�a'g��3.t�7���i�� .� ':.��a3Ybaoi���- _ �';p i, J .g3f+a
�:.+�w--�.�it.Qtv.�.i.:sa� ...
��1::.:.:'.
. 4 ,
lr;.._1
l±
1:>- �\`� p6tkin county
,;�.,
�s;,.` � dapartmant of socisl s�rvices ;
'��, � 0100 lone pine road �.r
�'`' espen,colorodo 89611
e�` 303-925-7245 ����
ys:
���'� PITKIN COUNTY
v: PLAC�MGNT AI,TGRt7ATIVE YLAN
��� PY 19II3-19S4
�'�:
e�:
��' I 1'roUlem Iden�ification and Selection of Tareet Groups
��,�: . _
�� As in past plans the placement needs of Pitkin County have �
�K been asr�sseci by hi>torical client patterns as we11 as broad I
I.� based conmwniLy input. [3ecause of the small population of i
�'� PiL-l:in County, a cerL-ain advanta e, even minor roblems have
��t a high level of visability. Coupled with a high degree of ;
;� pro:fessionalism, this conununity is able to address social
i�; problems identified aC a less intense level.
;l.:. -
1' In conCract Lo prior years l'he PAC/CPT has developed increasecl
x'; ;
internal sophistication. With that, however, comes the frus- [
- - '. �ration in lcnowing thaL' many children in our community with
a �,.?� identified needs inay not be eligiUle for services or may choose
.�. not �o utilize services. The team/commission frustration is
hi�;h. To assist us in defining what we can or cannoL' do we
�;�s,� u�ilized personnel from lhe state to 1) review cases to de- ! �
i;:. termine appropriateness of target group, services, 2) review• j
��' fos�er care placements sirice we were over expended and finalLy,
,��',: 3) shared with Ceam/commission County/State revitalization
�:� ouCCOmes. We've also had both the juvenile juclge and county
, �,'' ateorney atCend a regular meeting to better int-egrate L•he
k',-, underst._�nclin,; oi transition from team plan to court involvement.
. �2;�� . •p,
, 't'he ouLcome of these discussions and reviews are that:
�
��� 1. more children are being served with a PAC PLan than
�, ��oulcl be if no plan �oere implemented.
��� 2. prior year L-arbet oroups are appropriate as defined t
� in plan.
3. other agencies/groups need to respond Lo cases not
eilgible Lor DeparLment intervenLion.
� 4. �he plan has bcen effective and needs to continue..
�� 5. �lelinqu�ncy referrals from court still pose problems
�'� in Cerms of services and unanticipaCe�l placements.
� ' , '
II hlissi_on StaLement
�� The goal oL the plan continues Co Ue to address the needs oi
�rj Chese L'ar�e� Froups within the community in order to avoid
placements or when necessary place in the least restrictive
seL'L'int;,
� �.
>'s::. � . � ' � � .
4T . .
��,� . . ' . ,ti .
�`"y :v�y', . , . ' .
d�.'�.''�:11� . . _ . . � . . . .. � .
.�iiii;�'i�y . ' ..
c}:::+� . . _
}�.�,�,�:�1
�� s.;�j
-;;�'�%5��
;W���; � .
����.
;,`"�'�,�+
:. ..�
�{ �,,.�;; �
.r:�:`�:.;:�"::a
�` „�
_ ;j
:;'�,?:' ,
:;.';�>�..
, �
Y_ ._ �Jh�rad�`lkilaFfuw.cy�.�'..tie �- �.kw.. � .�.,•..,f��dF_L�r�i4..aP���....�:�-�^.�IW:.�4,xi<....��ii._c�+.y��yju;��;
�i.
� I:..'.....
�,;�
# �'lacemcnl• A1LCrn�tive Plan "'
1 Page L-cao
,
'.;':�
;;`';`:� III Special l?actors
�'" Uecause l.his plan addresses needs in a rural/resort town, the
�""'"i ability ta accurately predict program needs is diEficult. Some
'x",'� of Che folJ.owin� factors contribute [o l•his dilemma: . �
`"�,'� �. •.
' . 1, family moUility caused by seasonal employment. '
�` 2. economic factors that can suddenly contribuLe to � .:
�: hi�h sL-ress within ^ingZe parent households including
' lack oF. afPordable housing.
'`�= 3. a possibly LuirealisL'ic expectation of new arrivals
�'r' in Che area L-hat results in crisis and "transienC"
�"`-�;;:;
siL'uation.
�*�3 ; .
�� 1
,,.�'?. On the orher hancl, Che conununity prospers in lhe area of humatt
��; 5ervlce5 dUe Lo: 1
yan;, 1. a sCrong core of responsive and concerned communiC�
i�,�
f.�r�< individunls and fami2ies.
��� 2. the atCraction oF Che area to people with special re-
�{°� sources or expertise as in areas of therapy, recreation,
y'^'•;
E"""-• the arts, etc.
�F ;
""� 3, a powerL-ul networic of human services agencies and i -
'�''� individuals that work to eCher wel2 with few systemic ;
��'.��'r- g
��'%' barriers,
�` _ " 4. a population size that allows for community scrutiny,
"�+' awareness, and referral.
.. u�.`,x;� .
. .. '��,..:� . .
,,�.,.A:, ..
���;�- LV liistorical Data - Placements i�979, 1981 and 1932
it;;�,�� � ' j .
�y�? In 1979 there was an average of 3.5 children in RCCF's for 12 �
�"��- months cach or a CoLai of 42 months of care. In 1981 Chere was ;
e;;.:;+.•
C�����; one child in an RCCl� for a total .of 7 months. In Z982 chere
•, �{,�' were two children in RCCI"s for a toCal of 10 months. Initially,
tw�� �here has been a significant decrease in ACCP use, from 42 months
, ''� in 19J9 to 7 monLhs in 19II1. 'Lhe s1i�I1C increase to 10 months � "
�`'�;: :€ i�.
. z�, in 1932 can�be aCL-ributed Co an unexpecCed delinquency case
�{ assif;necl b; t,ie �lis[rict court Co L-his department.
_ :i'
I�osCer Care usc has increased as one might expect iahen the goal
�` is L-o increase leasC restrictive environments. Tota1 foster care ;
tr���
.}-� months havc gone from 10 in 1979, to 19 in 1951 to 46.5 in 19fl2. �
It is worLh t�oCing Lhat oae £arnily r�zth three siblings accounted �
��' L-or 3G months ot fosL'er care in 1952.
Pi1•�?`=. —
�x=
y;� A CPA c�as lirst utilized in 1979 for one particular chilci, thus
con�inue�l �hrou&h 19S1 at L-he same rale. Tn 19�2, the cour� re-
�"� uested ermanenc lannin "for the child, which F�as done. This
'�M�. 4 P Y P � "
� accounts L-or the decrease in toL-al CPA months to 4. There is no
��
�Vy
_ «�
s
�"�.
£;:
. c� . . . . �-_...<,w..,....-,." . .
. . � . . . . � . � !� . � � .
.}
.��
a :�``a�� t.
�,, •�° Y .
��
�- ' yi�;{;r� . � . . - .. �
�:�w .°
":.� ��y;',a ..
�a�+';?"a•"?
z.y:�i;x:iy,
.zi,�`.;��r�.a
:t�'.�:wiu
, ,=t��
:'.":f,f • i
V.�:,'#�',��� �
�
�� �::���
�.��..�,�,��
� ��
_ _.
,:yi`°f`:' , ,
`"�Y:-i;�n:��l'.
i � � ,
�.
4 n'7 ,:3 � �s j ��#� . �<��w1'�}k L �A•r,'�.a,q '�,'r�� c�`K'�i�.r�}Y F" a�.�ri S�'�i��+r..�`jti ;
-., vywtp�`�t,+1s� $ �:' �'s+�d � �fF1,1�,J �t ��t �a( � r�it�'-� �e-:. ��`x a v� ��Ni�a
�3"'''�'°�"`�.v�'�����y " .,.��b,��+�� ��E�SiF�r�-x�1�.�wF� 1 '�''rir ` .��i Yk^`�4
� x. • , .. y ,u . ''�,,� r�+ � �M ,L
�
„rF��`,�...��'�G+E�L" . a�i•7YS _`(;�f'�Y ^ k. � . .l'%�4�'�y�S�e.s,�'. .�, . �.���a (N��j`r fI��A� r
P� C,g
�..�sh. . ...� �.�xe..._._ .. •a+�-:.,, . . .i_.,.
- �:i,� . ..' . . .
;;';;"� • PlanemenL' ALCernitive Plan
Pa�e Lhree
�Y< -
�
� 'anCicipated use ot CPA's in the current plan.
%��F;�
'.',-';a>` The use oL- group (�ames has �one irom no placemenCS in 1979 to
'�'<��' one chilcl L-or 12 monCh, in 1981. In 1982 Chere ��ere 2 child- s'��
�.r i� ren in care for a tol:al ot 16 monlhs.
�'`��
•'"'= As exhiUil A indicaL-es, there has been a significant decrease
!��. in the use of RCCP's frc,m 1979 to 1982. At the same time, an
t,��r- increase in least restrictive settings, mainly fosCer care, has
�"'� risen.
. �
�ti- In accounting foz the change in er.tphasis, credit must certainly ,
�' Ue given to l-he formation and mairitanence of the 1'iCkin County !
3�'' Placement AlternaCive Commission. �
�,�•:
�'�� f
��?; It is worth noting Cl�at, because .Chis is a small county, the �
�; impact ot- one family case can significantly impacC the f_oster -�
� care allocarion. The group of 3 sibiings mentioned earlier is f
�'•; a good example oE this. In addiCion, with SCate legislation '
�,,��� aimed at'diverCing delinquency cases from the Department of �
�;µ�;� Institutions, the courts wi1Z increasiiigly involve the DepartmenC f
�:. oL Social :,ervices in case planning and placemenC. i
xT.', �
i
r� P'inally, the added stress of poor economic canditions nationally, �
;��4 will cerL-ainLy pu(: more families at risl:.
's�r. ..
hr y
: 1„�.,� _ ' � � �
��� , ' �
�� I
•* I
� ,;�,.,� � � 't,,
Kt'= � -
h F•
• �
..,.. _._. �� •
. SL'+' ' . . � .
W
(
�/f
}j�'N
� ' .
._.. �k-:`_.
F _
�
— __ -- .....:.e.,.�..,.._.� � ___i
.: .
`� �;,a - _ .
�: _
`"���
.:��
� .
� ,
- r
; ,
,-'�.;�:,�:�
- �,
,:,�;: . �
�,�,�•`;�v':T,ii, .._
��
- - ��) � .3`�� ( •'t < J' J7. W�Y ,��.;•,
.. .. # .. w L�, S �, �k � �';Kd � � t r) ����h- �.:�
,f�`'= t r \+ dk. b k j=. Sg��� -.. e ���� +�.K �.t�._ '7 i� �'
. � -� '� 7�f��t�`3iv�,°=` '�iy n•��`''!�t � t'., i 7 4 4"S � '``�� _ -� ct �1 i � ,
q -� '���`�f�i4`�'�1.�'�1�i`�z �{�F:ux''I(`' 1�. -.t+�T^'�k ��� � i�11 r �,° - � a � .r,�''" ���� � � �..
� yrnw'..,_��.''i.3Se.i.t,`�.�.i«;'.a-..w'.+x����t�,�:, �x^• . 3. �.Ws3.�1:::'� 1�:5 :r..'`-c � Sf_'Fi .x�s.�:�t' r.,� , .
`� P].acemen� A1CernaL'ive Plan
-;,'� Pabe Lotir.
i
��_' :�
V Process Cval�iation
;�,-=
ofi•;;`' A. ImpacL- 01 Placement A1Cernative Servi.ces �
i , � .:
��; 1. :-fenL-al I-leall'h 5ervice Yacicage - This a1L'ernal'ive has con-
Cinued Co be bo�h a much needed service and effective. Four
� ; &..:;="
r:z-
families were relerred L-o this alternative and only one place-
;� �. ment was necessary. It should be noted that these cases receive � :":
•�;':?
,,,�,,;...;. priority i'rom the Aspen Mental Health Clinic, and interagency
J�c�;:' cor.imunicalion is excellent. �
v;:,' -
. �.y'e2'- -
i'�"``-• 2. Specialized I'oster Care - While the PAC continues to iden-
'�� tif- s eciali:;ed foster care as im ortant, the
t:n:�:t= Y p- p problem lies in
'���°'' an ef£ective plan f.or program development. With a severe limit
•�r`,::
j�'`�"' on ezcess caseworlcer L'ime, due to an increase in caseload, there
.-:�;�.
�.r�, is lacl:ing an individual to manage program development. The
;��,, PAC will amend the plan L'o include L-his alternative, if proper
��G;; implementation is developed during fiscal year 1933-1984.
A_;.,
hMnY_:
�,�Y�,. 3. Placement Review Committee - This commil-tee was utilized •
�'',,��: primarily in s[a[fing probaCion and court referrals. 'rive cases
'?�>:` were service specific to Lhe PRC while additional cases were
�'y staffecl in �he parent body of PAC/CPT. Plans ��ere formulated.
� M�;;��� and useLul in �leterminin� proUlems and identifyin� needed re-
_ L-en-als to PAC services or other community resources.
-;:i-
i�:<'�: L:c Enditures antici zted throu h 6/83 wi11 be °600 used for
r._. P' P< P 4
�.„<,.
ra,;: memUers Co atL-end Che C.J.C. Conference. Because Staff Develop-
' s'��'�� ment Pl.an coill only cover rTC.:s, this resource is valuable Co �
R.��-.
�_,-, allow Craining for inembers.
�ii:`
� `�=i?`:' '
�;,,,.�-'„ 4. ParenL'ing Training - This service has provided useful pre- -
�� -.Y�},, venL-ion L-o the Conununity aL large. Ulilization Uy our Depart- ^�:
;r,��' ment has been minimal because of difficulties with group mix i;'
:r*'� (appropriateness of client to group process) and timing (8 week
4'x< �
��:::
-,r:. classes, 3 times/year). Social Services and Health Services i
'?'< continued L-o co-lead Llie denses and the community response has =
__ �� Ueen excellenL. • S
. �"�'i. � ; �
:� • 5. Day Treatment (RecreaCional Counseling Alternative) - This �i
�' allernative has been the most successful in ter.ms of number of
`� chilJren served and diversion from out of home placemenl. Of �.-.
p:�. the seven children served only one has Ueen placed out of home.
a�.:-a
�y,, Titis a1L'ernal'ive is being continued for this child while in•a
�,.��' group homc, with the intention that continued involvement will
��fi shorten placement Lime. •
t7:.
a
��� , .
�� � .
�
�.�'�
yj., . . -
'ia.tiY4; - . . l..•�
.. ]:,.�.. ..
I
�
i •
-. � . , . . � . �� . '
� _
1"��� . . . � .
ti�,1* � .. . .
���� _ - .
.;.r��
4.��: . .
t_ . .
� .
� z.;�.,r_�w"a
���s `:.:�.
.�i �
=:«r,:, .
, � r �
.�;�+.�+.';��d7� �'�:hf �� r ,,,- i fi� �zia �}� `"�'���t � ,w�%t t� -� ��4i+r� �
��d . )� �'3• i�,oip!, t 7;,hf�t,� _ y.�N`qti ��.k"' ' �.�i' ��i u. a� 1S �.�,� L rr��� a�ah,cl�'P
�t,�a�y,�;�1x.u��{?��ia�"�'�� r,'31I��'�F�i�tR�3�'��.�_�*'tr."�dlnw��ai.Fi��i13r��=i���>.3�r '�� :i-�...:ar�..�:���'r� • y.
. ..SaaiSro. ,�11�r..:� ...y....�.o.._.:CCic��. �...
K: � :
!
'� I'lacement AlternaClVe Plan � t
;�,,^�
•Pa�e five
e
3�'� 13. Sinumary
r�..
�i:; 'Phe combinaLiOn oL- a responsible process that has educated the
w�e coimwniL'y on �lacetnents, the ability of an exL-remely sensitive
�r.; ;ind lcnowl.edgeable Child ProCection Team/Placement Alternative `
�r` Conmiission and the clevelopmenL• and use of alternative service }��, �
�' io�rams has definilel decreased restrictive and cost2y pZace-
�'�`' P' b Y
inents oulsicle of Pil'l:in County. Further, Che intervention has
� Ueen effecCive in Cerms of minimal disrup[ion to families and
�-,;; childxen anci encouraged appropriate adjustmenl-s.
�^ -
�' .
}�: VI Service Pacl:a�e and CosC
r� �
`•�,�`=° The following services are placed on a continuum to illustrate
�_�� points of inCervenCion deemed necessary to prevent and reduce
�w pl�tcements. i�lote rhac s�rictly prevention measures axe no cosC
�?'.:
�,�;; where as at ris[c of placement cosCs are incurred.
�+�.
$`�'� 1. Yal.-enCi.n> C'}.ass S.T.C.P.)
: .�,_ ��
�;: J
i'p�' S�otzsor: Community ilealCh Services
���
��.
_ �i, TargeL' Group; llSS involved Eamilies as we11 as families
� �.y�, in the-�or,uniulity. ,.
�'"�;; ReferraZ Source: Self re£errals, DSS and community agency i
�.�:F;� reL-errals. �
�-�t �
� t'�y' Purpose of Service: 1) Irtcrease parent effectiveness, 2) i
x�.,;,
�;.�y provicle (�reveiiLion services that will decrease inappro- i
r�-;�� FriaCe parenting_ �
+• 1.'
- �-� No. of Groups and Clients: G groups at 3 sessions per �
��,4-" broup. 10 individuals per group. ToCaI served = 60 `
.��
. i����?,h ' i
��� Cost: ll5S-PAC referrals = individuais at $SO.QO per in- "
,��r�
��+ dividual = cost of $300. �
��... ?
• ���� � 1
'""_• ImplemenCatian DaCe: Otigoing since 1/32 ,
c�Yy;�� �
�^i?sr
� 2. !ldolescent Group
�. _ � «.�
��.�. � 'fargec Croun: Youll� in conilic[ as defined in Program
� L�y� �11G'Fi ZV
��� '
y.�s�..y.
�� Referral Source: School of£icials and truai�[ officers.
'�w�:;�:Z"S'; .- .
�
�y Approval For. Service: School Psychologist and DSS Social
�} �+: Workcr (Co-led by Uoth individuals)
,'�:
�„'�''�`
�...�.
���s.
�
� ' j'
' , _�,_ _ .
, _. _,_.. _--.. _. �--
�: __ __�_..�;-- ;
--- -- - �- .
��
,%
sn.9 . . � � _ � � . .
r
,�i�'�� _..
�M�• -
,�
��. -• _
,�,
.�.���,,
':,*.<P;��
;, .
s. •-• •
.�� ; ,
w
..'����
�<';..�:�,.,
__�- -___.^�
;
::�':'�.;:' .
;<r=� _
. _ , ��
�l n r• t � k�+�.. �t i�,�*-.ti��,�_�r �.,., -' a r� '� y�hj�a r .
n �lr ir'k '�`+� '�t . ��1"�'sr¢h�� �}",aa} w y�}�a���.s�� rf��:7f5Y�x A� a � +, r�i� �
''-�� ?�:�,��r �,�ii'��.cryF��ll. �'�jSR d��},f^'{`��}zi:� b' LG�i'r -'�,j� i'f., ; '�si ���Xf+ �,1� S'�i�
� �O�l�ei::.►�nC',�iY�����e,,.�i»,r.r,d.y' ��`�'"iYx:�6.i�+..�i.S�'..,:.:�`�..::'a�. �S£.d-4"^ '. .. ����,r���.'u�1::.t:'"1 "
� , PlnccmenC A1CernuCive Plan
N�-tge six
�=-n>, � Yurpose ot- Servicc: 1) Provide positive peer �roup inCer-
!:�.;-
_�,;;; venti.on, 2) rrimary tocus on appropriate acaden�ic and
;'+;;'=- socz.al performance, 3) provide alternatives to less formal
;�?.'. recreaL'ional tlierapy and highly seructured mental heal�h
iY°i:` service. ti .
lr.,,, .
�" .� No. ot iou s and clienls: 'L'wo, eight week groups, maximum
,�;.,,�' B- P
��rv,:f 3 youth per group,
:v=;-:;a:
i�:� Cost: No cost.
�', Iiu lementaCion DaCe: Se temUer 1983 �
�`>: P �' � "
r��;-:t •
1��."';:::. ,
?`�`"' 3. Placemenl' Revieca Coc�unittee
:�,�'"% i
-e�.
,��z,_ TargeC Group: Pre deli.nquent and delinquenC adolescenLS.
�Y�ti�
��':,::�
��,.,�.�.
�i,�;;, IteEerral Sources: PraUaLion, Law �nforcenent, District
�"'� Atlorney`s OLCice.
��'�'-.i' .
t''�.�; I.eview Purpose: L•':;haust community resources, establish new
Y'"r�' re.sources as needed, feed information to larger PAC re:
;=�;,=;
�;r needs, plans, ou�comes. l4alce recommendaL'ions to proUation
�'."� �t ,:, OL" COIITC. �
. . G.F �.l , :
;��;� Nw��ber oL reviews completed: 10 '
�;'�;2?._� .
�`kd=:',' ProjecLed Cost: Training money for commit�ee members $300.00.
� �r{�;�; ' , 1
i�+• :
���.,;; Lnplementation Date: Ongoing since July 1, 1932 �
�,�,F� � .
�';�� ,; F:
i �+
-:F;b,� 4. Recreat�onal Counselor Alternative
";��..k , •=
�.`r:�x� 'Larget Group: Ct�ildren and adolescenCs at risl: of placement. �-
• '�,,f�^'•y�_ '�:4�
�r'tVi
x='"r Referral Sources: Placement P.eview Committee, Schools,
�.
��"H` ?4ental llcall-h, Law �nforcemenC, and other parents or
k ti agencies. �
��;�
-�� Approval f:or Service: Determined by Yrincipal Social Warker �
' as ,art ot agreed upon treaLment plan. �
'�-.�-'�,F
t^�,'>;�`� Purposc ui Sei:vice: Provide alternative therapeutic,inter-
�'��-� veneian �hat tocusses on recreaCional alternalives for
�5'�� Pil'l:in Cou�Cy youLh and children.
��,. .
�r� ' 1. can supporC Craditional in-office Cherapy.
�k� 2. reJuce polenZiaT of family crisis.
�.��.„,, 3. enhance self esteem of client individual.
���!"; 4, corom�miL'y based preventive service.
�3�y�;+.;
�`;'`� NuntUer and cost per client served: 10 clients/year aC 3Q
. :��: .
client hours. S25/hr.
tJeL cost = �750Q.00 ` ��'
Impl�amctnr_:it:. ... ..,i�e: Ongoing sittce July 1, 1982 �. '
i
. a�'�� . . _ �. . �` � � -
��� . . � .-. . - � � �_. .
. T'�,M ..A ... . .
..e.�Yi:} . .
. ry`';���� .
� � .
; t
� .,
j
. ,�,vY�`j�p�(�J
tfy::.'Y�1•��a�%� '
,rt.x'V���'r':'�� .
!
:'?��a
;�%F^''R%t° , .�
".,:.,: ,:: .
� 'NY�
.. -+..��rY-Y 1i� �..��� �'t�+d'A ..� a � } }'a�!'p�t���.4'•�"�1'��"� s� �''�ja7 �' 7, r.� ��'l'
Lt �-��.y ^��_ �x�i`� � r� � �.�d,,j.f� �,?��st � a� f�i�c� ;:, t iir � ,�.7� "���a1�t:,r 4t.-z�f�..:.
T '��Y'�"� `'i �4��,,�� � ..��� ;��k N'19 �5.��,{�;��,. � yr:�''�x��. f(�����''�� '�::
z��lh���.;��'�`",�';:,...�,_� t� .1's ����,.�+�r: � ..'�'7?t �i'� �. + q , ��.r�+
�._.,,�.t.z:> :$.3Y�.�:.�+.�4i. ,a.:» r�..,.� ts�.�:���
��
� _ �.�, _;..-
.�':�
(.t:;[;.'.t�l
'"" Placement AlternaCive Ylan
��-�;� Page seven ,
i;.,;
�;5-::
"s:.�;�.:..
,�n,n S. Mental 1lealth Service Pacicafie
edi�::'��? �
;�:;;;- Target Group: Children r�nd famil.ies at risk of placement.
�s�';� Re[erral Source: Principal Soczal ldorlcer, DSS. � ��
�-*`� �',
'�R` Approval for Service: same �.
� : .
6 � Purpose �.[ 5ervice: 1} Provide Craditional Cherapeutic
�"�
�F� inCervenL-ion caith problematic families, 2) provide
�'1?�"' foster parenCs wich essenl-ial knowledge for consisCent
�.
y���;=: ,
g�;',.,� care and lreaLment of child, 3) Assist in development t
'�""' of TreaLment Plan for CPT, PRC or DSS Social Worker.
<�*�'=w
���_`, i
��•�?�'� idumber of client: 12 families
�a�:! '
��=a:.`:�
��:;�_ Cost: $3G0/Lamily = 12 intervention hours per family.
��'��.�. '
�"�='�'� Implementatio❑ DaCes: Ongoing since Ju1y 1, 1921.
.��; j
- ' 6. Pai�iil ![ome-[3ase�l Care �
� },��' _—_--Y_---- �
r�. :,:;`. i
;5iwc:..,
�};,;zF. Tar�et Group: l�au�ilies in crisis with children at zislc of
�;k_.,:r', p�acement ouL' of home. Pamilies thaL' because nf geographic �
M.��.;�
��;,�,`y`: locaeion, suspicion toward helping agencies or economic
�, ,�;�„ barriers, would not benefil from Craditiortal case planning
�'`` `�`�: or Lherapy.
,,.zY;., ;
�r�;�:;
C�aA;. Feferral Source: Principal Social Worker, DSS. ?,
�*'�� Approval for Service: same
�`�''_,%.
TS S.
�' '� 1'Urpose of Service: 1) Provic�e family home based planning a-��.
"F��Ns and therapy, 2') target specific goals that will reduce or � '`�
,�.�.<,
��'� eliminate out o£ l�ome 2acement for £amilies children:
r-.s.s@' P
-.•; ;`i�ai
. �x,,.; -
• x��::,a:�- Number oi families: 4 �;
�F. � :,
Cos�: Initi.al Consultation $260.00 2 In-Service Consulta- i
�� cions at $670.00 Total = $930.00. �
�-�._:.''.
�.t�' ' LnplemenCaCZOn Dale: Ju1y 1, 1983 �
�. � .
ay"��"'�'''�.
��>�+� .
f
�:
��
�.�,��::
z...'
. �
c
i
�
- ------- _.._._._� .....-�;.�„�: �,:,.,,�..-.._._------ .__..._ __ _---
. i'SYY/W.�.N..w.w.�+-----�-_'— . .-a.�N!t�4�ir'.+�,4k.L",:"�Y�'+-ra.w .
,K�d �,' _ .t t . � � � ,� � � � � .
� 'Y�4� . � - � . . � � . . . .
�� �� ' . . �� �. . . . . . . � .. .
.. r.',��. .� �. . - .
Y� • • f
ry �
r'.,.....7j:'M;r�l�
...Ay�T3;�. . .-
�'.�fi��iift7ti 1' - �
��
' ` ..rv :;,b��:�7 s .�� ���!f���,� 5�'`l�.`d�s,Y � i,�� �v��Yh1 y��-rr�'t�'t`T�'rh ' .
�,..y '+ -r*f 1�' ; a��a��� . 13. ���� "l�y{�ihyt�Z(iny.. "i.,'i� .^,3�'`x �� iyh' ._ .
' r i�:•' .�s rq �i4.!F sju.A����w�.�at �j:��`f. H:.0 �,�'�4 ;, �c �1 � �
_ �.' . ' Ji���.�s�.� ..ta1':h1 ��' r.6�' �..c.FK } �a° s�
� .. . . . . ��.�..;
`,,=:., ,_ _...�PLace���eul' A7.L'ernetL-ivc 1'].an .
`�' 1'rigc cigllL'
�_ �
Pr_ .�,
�j '� V3.I Stumnair o[ Savin
a. --�----Y------�=
:a:r,.;.-: �
�'=' IL can be shown from past figures Lhat the PAC alLernatives have
::�';:. .
'.;�,.-,' setved to divert costly out oL• home placement-s (ex.1979 4 PTE
��. RCCr's, 19fi2 10 months for one child) . IL is the Foal of Lhi.s �
'ti plan L'o continue L-o mainCain a qualit-y level of service ChaC will
�":'-'� diverC unnecessary placr-_ments. The money savings will again
;;,� _ focus on diverting 4 FT� P.CCP placements. �
i-<�,;;:
i�+�:�? Savings: Cost of alternatives = 513,350.00
��` �.
�?i�ri-k
��, cost of 4 xcCr FTC's = 9G,o00.00 F
�.-,,.:;
r.�=°> -
y.un;� savings - 32,650.00
�!r}�• ,
�,`�x_
3z:.,�;
�'���'' VIII Evaluation
��f��j!
��t.:�
!Y-`�= Monitoring and Lvaluation wi17. be done wit'h L-he PAC. Success of
�ka�W�: programs will be measured in terms of pracLice sLandards .and out- �
�->�; .
�r.,�; conie - two separaCe measuremenCS. �
:�%
ti;r.,,. ,
h ,�' 1. Pracl'ice SLandara5:
� �' '��`�
��cs ;; Uti.lization of services - numbers in each program.
�_,.�. �
;: Placement Review Cortunittee, meetings and process. i
'� A�plical-ion oL PlacemenC Criteria. �.
�_.:.
r;,:�- AccepLance of' court of 1'RC recommendations. ;, _
�;r?�:'� IniCiat'ion�and L'raining�in tlome Based Services. �
..-
�:,�.;' j
�:-:�: 2. Client Outcome: s
�,._..r ,_ ,+.
��;�
�� _r*�i Incidence of recedivism.
k"�°' Numbers in foster homes vs RCCr's. '"`'�
�:;;:: Numbers oL referrals to DOI.
:'n Probation referrals that mainL'ain proUaLionary status.
K:),.3.
F;.., 1
�+;::� The evaluation process is directed more to system functioning �
�"` ; than client outcomes. lJhile this may al' first seem inappropriaCe �
� �''-'� it is clear to us that iF services aren't uCilized or clienCS are
� nol' accepted, Chen client outcomes �aill be irrelevant to service
� � pro�rams. Further, Che process of plannittg, invoivemen� of- olher
�.'y a�ency people, and the combined agency focus probably divert more
�, children .from placement than any single service component, a unique
�;�;"^ but relevant process in a small county.
�.
F. :�
�� .
. " ' • -
f `
�
.• . ._ ....._ _.. _. _... ___--.
. ._....,.......«M«.�-..,....---------- �- . .
- ��-""�1 . . . . , * .
. �„�b , .. ._ . . .
' ���:� _ . .,
�"� t�
w
,��,�.�
:���
t .
r • '� � �
„ 21•
. . ���.l;wnt� ..>
T"....-�e.{.�.� .
:�
;�t�.�%o�;F�-� �� /
!,p?il
�.. / ' � t �e./ l� r M1 ,i}.tPS '� � A�'i,.{���F .lLh�.
� t ����L��� '��it 4�nk f�' '��� � -r 1' Lq�"�i-'�rvs``
G� ' .� �i� l� �� z,� � �•�"�(��� " t�rX x i 'Ki�t, �5� z',t
..±�'���`7'"_ ?:�+ �� t ��2y..."�u` /� �� +������t'��"�`t�S
� .. . ._.. .. st,.,;pa� ..
`:�
�xhibit A
•��� j
�",'"" TOTAL MONTHS OP CAR�
,� �
(�.
�n
''= rYr�: or '�.
'�• FACILITY 1979 1981 1982 '� •'
�? z
�
�
acci� ��2.0 7.o io.o
�.,
#�
1`° . �
�%� r.c. 10.0 19.0 46.5
�1
� Group '
#� Home 0 12.0 16.0
r
'r
�
;+ CPr� 12.0 12.0 4.0
? � � �•
�
�� ToTnL 64.0 50.0 76.5 �
,.� , •
F.
� , t:.
� r
1 �
. . I . , - ... �f�. N
�`
1
.. � . . . . �n�s�ne+ie�k4weaae!wnrfN� . - �me. . ._ ..1�„'T_��.
..� � . . . .. - . , .. ; " .� . . .
. . �� . .. � . . ' ., '� . , . . . '
� _ w� .. . . ' .. . . . � .
T
. �. .. . . . . .
.. � r
�
�'..s��.�''� .