The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.min.reg.06271983 � �, ,�,: ' ;;�;: _ :. ' - �.� ,.�oX•r.�.e�`s�,lY��:�.:.;�..�'k �..,5 .f��T�„�d`�"!�Sf�_.s' ��ttti`ir�t�'_d�,k�.'`��'F�'�t�,c! - �°ry, ::x ;� � R �"�S »� i�:�.. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA .s i�� :: . �.�t 27 JUNE, 1983 � ; �' LAND (JSE � �:°' 10:00 a.m. Public Hearing - Le Chamonis Nonconfozming Exemption - ��-. j; Richard Grice, Planning L_i/: �'s,: a; 10:30 Aspen Racquet Club, Filing II, Final Plat - Richard Grice �:': �� y.�. 11:00 Stillwater Sand Pit Continued - Richard Grice ��' `�, 11:30 E11: Mountain Lodge Annual Review Continued - Richard Grice ;-� ;�'� 12:00 Lunch Break j"� 1:30 p.m. Public Comment _ � , ;%` ADMINISTRATION f�,-: 1:45 Resolutzons and Contracts .':�;;� Minutes _ ��: Nicklos Lot Split - Richard Grice a,�;_4 Final Reading - LUC Amend: F�1R Requirements in the �`.r.,. a;N AR-1 Zone District - Alice Davis �:�k Council On Aging Appointments - Jamie Hall �w � `k4�, I'irst Reading °'` Supplemental Appropriations - Tom Oken, Finance Director �L::!:i ..w ��". 2:00 Public Hearing - First Reading: Airport Revenue Refunding `Z4 :: Bonds - Tom Oken - �:,�- Second Reading Scheduled for 28 June, 1983 @ 9:00 a.m. ;�; Y. i, 2:15 First Reading and set Puhlic Hearing ;- i`'�x Ordinance Providing for Disposal of Water Rights - �: Wes Light, County Attorney `y fr�•�`> 11 July, 1983 @ 11:00 a.m. ',<,�r'>.'^ `'1":�c £�.Ky: Ordinance Approving Land Exchange on "South Avenue" Right- �u=;�; of-Way - Pat Dobie, County Engineer ��; 11 3uly, 1983 @ 11:30 a.m. �� 2;45 Relocation of Glider Operations at Airport - Dick Arnold, }'""�°fi,�. Airport Manager � �v, � s�{ 4:00 Joint Meeting `f '" . Smuggler Area Improvements Agreement - Pat Dobie, County �:` � ;�. Engineer ;"s ,i F �!:.� ' �� ...,m�e"�, . 5:�`n^'i�.'�r - .:..�i•.:1 ,,,;.1".'.�:-s�v - � _ . . -,..,,w ___ ____ .�. - - `, ;_�^s'�'y` , , y l:i�-,� .. i � �} :fi�� t�,a '� . .�, ��y't+'4�.'� . + ._ ;...�. ;� '��d:v r n� �� - �'��'�..,C,��,, �'1_ .d 5� �`(.. � �r;�K �-C� Eh�i�,rr 1 �a�c � a*_�� ,-. �,. ��v��.qV u�Fy �:S� lt�{��„n �5 -' �' t �' ��t 1�'�/at' f. � q�s��' rt a, �'� . � '�i��„�,k R��4Y��r��'G h 'r �� +^r. �'�� il[y.ti,rt_��`��.:,. � �iC'.�$�Ssr �- , �. � :.-�4'�'M ,�s Si . ;�� '.�r SsKL�'*w k�,',t+iCi..�"� r- ,-;`-s •,..a'�Is..,� . ..a��r.iFdetk�i+:--k.':' . e_..r,.sL�wna' ..._.. , _ . . .. ..._. _.. __ .. .. '�_'. ..::r:a::.. � .. . . . . �,1~ �y^.. t'S' :'�• �p t �.i �, ��' � � :'f.=9 Y � �� p� I �" ( � I i � i Z; �� I .. Y.: � PITKIN COUNTY �. � � � �;�.�; BOARD OF CCPM1iSSIOI�RS � }„.� i �`�i ? ri� r'•'�� c � � �Y�Ji; `;� ��' k , �x � -k`° I�GULAR MEETING 27 JpNE, 1983� 41 c,PRESENT: GEORGE MAUSEN. RHOMAS BLAKE, HEI�N KLANDERUD, MIC1-IAEL KINSLEY i, i - _�_______ :r. t. � � Public The Board wnvened a public hearing to consider the Le Chaimnix non-conforniing � �� Hearing: � . "r:; Le exenption, a special review application. Assistant Planning Director Alan Richman z. $::cha¢mnix � submitted to the record the Planning Office �re�no of 27 Jime, 1983, the Aspen Area ar, ;•' General Plan as amended, and the Land Use Code as amended to date. The applicant has !:� '" requested an exe�Qtion from the limitation on repairs, alterations and restoration f� � for the Le Chartionix CondaniniimLS, a non-confornung use situated on Maroon Creek Road. � ��,,,� The request was submitted pursuant to Section 7-1.20 of the Code, a recently adopted , ` �.. � �<�^.:.;'.. ; pmcedure whereby non-conforming uses may request an exert�tion based on various ��:�':�'. � y-:::; :� 4 :, criteria of record. The Le Chamonix request was submitted so as to allav the use r. �;, to meet practical difficUlties and hardships; existing restrictions have made it > i difficult for owners to obtain adequate insurance coverage due to the limitations i . ; on re�irs and restoration. The Building Department has also indicated that there are � • "life, health and safety" concerns as well, as structural inQrovements to the � � foundation would be necessazy in future. i The request was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning ComRission at their regular i meeting of 10 May, at which time a recortmendation of appmval was made subject to I the following two (2) conditions: � � - there shall be no extension or e�ansion of the use by an increase in the floor area ' t or rnmiber of dwelling units unless the Building Inspector deternunes that an �� . ._...�. �. _ ..�.T ,� ' .:, i{:> . . ':::�;. �� i�'. ��ry.'� 1� ��A'�n n t � z_. ; 5 ! .. �tr'�'� .,�Kl ..,w'iJ� s.. �j ��:��:: .:: p'� '�G.,�'f$3 �t r� r :t� h t ' �.r.. � �-L f,{ s� rw �;�v'�t'' 1 L�i Si � - .. `� � i,J$�-�},��r t�r,��.��e:`rztG �:rr>xl `, '�j``�, e } r+ �w '�`r.s f !� . w;w�:�,..._.�.��."�.Fka..._.�_.t. J _ .r-la'`...m..�:S��..'.:.... •'cr�c„__u._.�_t._�. y .�:..�.,y.d+ �.,...;�.:�r....i:.;»<we wd� �.:��.:. . i,, , insubstantial increase to the floor area is necessary to meet life, health and i;;,' safety requir�nents of the Building Code ;�`:-;;,`� - there shall be no modification to the general configuration of the use prior to :,,.j its review and appmval by the Planning and Zoning Cortmission (CHILD P.RRIVES) "�r"__� f pa,:_:r..' Madsen then opened the hearing for public comrent. Gideon Kaufinan, representing �,.� ' r��'�`� the applicant, explained that the requested exe�tion was categorical and that no �' ti. t�"Il specific alterations were intended for any of the units at this time. He noted that � � ^1 ' :�'°''" any construction activity would require prior Planning and Zoning Comni.ssion approval. �;,*�`� �;%,:` �,��; Madsen asked for additional comnents; there being none, the hearing was closed. i.,�'�•.� y.c1={=j �s=�<; Kinsley moved approval subject to the two (2) wnditions noted above, Blake seconded z�.;,� `,'__�"r t;c;:;;., and the [rotion passed with an abstention from Child. ;�,... `-r;;•�-� ?'�ie:_�� . v _•: ---------- a�.'•';.1 � . s''�2'r d�':=��Aspen Alan Richman introduced the Aspen Racquet Club, Filing II, for final plat review. �J i Rd' ]2t ` '.`�Club The application, which rern,acts approval for the construction of a duplex imit on the ��Filing . • 1.;,;,;, ii Racquet Club property, received detailed submission approval in May subject to -:<-Final - ;' P]at seven (7) conditions of record. Those conditions have either been satisfied or agreed to by the applicant, and the Planning Office recamiended final plat approval subject _`'- �} to the following five (5) conditions: �:::.; �="-� - the Housing Authority shall approve the Housing A�e�ient and subsequently, the , ;^'-� approved Agreement shall be recorded " - the Subdivision Agreement shall be executed and recorded along with the final plat - all utilities shall be installed undercgound - Steve Conger's letter of 9 June, 1983, to Richard Grice shall be a pernanent comnitment running with the land. Prior to the issuance of building pennits, the 2.��;',;,' Planning Office and the Building Department shall verify the consistency of the y�'`�, building plans with the comnit[nents contained therein ' '' - the landscaping plan shall be fully irtglemented as illustrated on the detailed ;:�::;, submission dated 28 April, 1983 prior to the i.ssuance of a "certificate of occuQancy" `q;� for the duplex. However, the Planning Director may authorize the i�lementation �,�-;•`.�" I of an alternative landscaping plan upon his determination that the alternative ;;;�'c,J plan is superior and would result in more effective i�lementation of the County's ;�;;;; scenic quality policy T x �; � `� . `' � RicYm�n noted that the landscape plan submi.tted by the applicant establishes height F � � limitations for all future residential develo�nent on the subject property; future � � . F ;s_ : structures would be limi.ted to either nineteen (19) feet if the existing landscape ' r' F ` plan is irtQlemented, or twenty-four (24) feet if the plan pmposed for the Clubhouse :i �� t ��' special review is approved. lv :. Fa �:��` Blake expressed some concern that the screenin of the d lex be accortglished, �,�,; 9 uP e, ;�:s� and suggested that the applicant be required to sareen ninety percent (90�) of the s-; ? structure from the hi9hway. �:i��: �' �"''` Kinsle su ested that the land use review procedure incorporate the elevation •;,;; Y 49 «�:. s�.i, !`�.'�� of a parcel so as to ensure the adequate screening of a structure. It was also �; rr;; �'�.='" suggested that a standard be established whereby a certain percentage of every i;'t` �=:;:'; development must be screened from the highway. K; �''� Klein noted that the landscape plan must be implemented prior to the issuance .�s. �:"�''= ��*. 4°'�;�t � e:�;�:"� � g 27 June, 1983 - 2 �:,;:,;„ Comnissiarier s Meetin �:-._ ::._.... .. - ,,; ;�+�: ' _ '�,. , y� � { � ,. , - �j �e} .3y" } ! k� f � }�� 3 P, '/ �y�2l� f� �{� j4 .. N �i � � �t:x w +w'3� { + y- �t � � � r ° '�''�% .r� �'7��'�.•. . �r�'�St`fiy dY'��• 'ei� '��r�� i J "'�'�%11�i { �r5� � .� �M.a 'y, > .;� •q, - `.:4�a s '61 F- N ]�5�ts4�i��lR��i`�S-s��M•I�'1 i ��.'�r T�'� 2t� r h��7 �r 'F �;�'�� t��K�31�,r, � . S.f'� f4f � fsl.Si 1ft �`-hii 4�k�» M.�r't..i?�1�j. ' 1y, l.'�F �Sx� ,r �. � ��.ti#r� s . ..,.v�= .t.�t.�,,.�i� �, n ��.��°....��.��.w.s��°�'.!�-�,�� •�'`,h�; "FfAr � y*di rX,rt'' .. �.�_.�:�x�t.u..-�rvx . .�- v.i;+t-v._ _ .:,: ,._...�,.._' ;.., �.. . ... ( . _ _ .__ . , . .._. . . -� Gz;. '�.i of a certificate of oc 111thou h the lan �apancy. g p prwides for a mi.nim�un of seventy percent (70�) screening, he suggested that approval be fisther conditioned i;�., !:. . j#� to a review of the building plans and a standard of �,:; e:i��ty percent (80�) screening. a :t°�„! Kinsle then moved a y pproval of the application subject to the five (5) conditions �-f"+ '` rr,�,� of the Planning and Zoning Comrtission as amended below: � Z.�r .rj �_ �* - Steve Conger's letter of 9 June, 1983, to Richard Grice shall be a peimanent f;�� aartrtitment running with the land. Prior to the issuance of buildi.ng peLmits, the Planning Office and the Building Department shall verify the consistency of the 9� building plans with the cortmitrt�ents contained therein; said plans shall a].so be :5.,a� reviewed by the Board of County Comnissioners prior to the issuance of a bu.ilding � �'�'?y pezmit for the duplex so that the Board can consider the elevations and building � � plans for the duplex to ensure that, through the use of bezms, height limitations ��; and other massing techniques, the dupleac will be eighty percent (80�) screened � from any angle on Highway 82 �� and further, that the Chairnian be authorized to sign the resolution. Child seconded .�, ?�� :`? and tt� motion passed unanimously. r � ,,� Klanderud expressed some concern that the applicant was required, as a condition �,Y of approval, to enter into an agreement with the Housing Authority; the agregnent, t`c i��, which would restrict the �loyee imit to the law income categoxy, also restricts the x'`: "�= �;,.,. resale of the unit to a quarterly basis. The Authority recently amended the resale 4 f: ;°' provisions such so that all e�loyee units administered by the Housing Office can ' i-; _ only be sold quarterly. Klanderud was not supportive of this provision, and expressed ;,: - some concern that the resale of the duplex e�loyee unit would be so restricted. 'The �` `� Board generally agreed to review the resale provisions with the Housing Authprity G,.�: �• a ;:k: at a future date. � � iti , $;=*.'. Madsen expressed so�ne concern that the development of the subject property was j Fi;_7 [g.' °;�'� somewhat piecemeal; the parcel contains a d�lex structure, two (2) others are 3� ?_rta �;;-� anticipated, the expansion of the Clubhouse facility has been drafted, all of which �:� ��., �"'�. has been reviewed separately. It was suggested that the property should have been �� master laru�ed. Richman a eed that a PUD would have been ,f P gr appropriate for the entire �"'� ', parcel, but noted that the Cocie somewhat encourages separate review as each use �•. ��'"�.+ ,.,:`•;i��. 'y would require a Q� allocation. � �. rt __________ f... . . tillwater Alan Richman ir��oad the Stillwater Sand Pit, a special review application. and it The applicant has requested a four (4) year permit for the ojJELation of a sand and gravel pit on a parcel of land approximately twenty-nine (29) acres in size; the ! , '� ojJELation would consist of sand and gravel extraction on eight and one half (8'�) . acres, the processing of which would be limited to washing and grading. No more than "=� fifteen (15) trucic trips would be generated on a daily basis. Referral camients were i _ generally supportive, and the Planning Office recamended approval subject to tt� ��` follawing nine (9) conditions: �''"' �,;;.> ►..-: Crnmi i ' n �� . �..� � ..','Y,,�� ,tY,� , — 4 f.. ,� 3{��Y �� y.'�; �x.,r�..J p`�. {d t s.� . �- � r � '�F f¢- � i.��, ��{�'}��'� r c�� ti :. : . 11�.' � J. 1 ct�y-u ::��t j ��SS r :� . J s� � _�7 r��>;�G��,�G6'i i 7.Yrf�FAt+ 4a rf��....'�.�, y( t'� r �`....._s.'��'1'��..c e+rw.xeYittWK ':�+x .. . .....,�..t..,......��....._._._.+r. .:.3 ��:.C.� h_W.: r:r e:�:i�S^,'� � I �;`• . - the Covnty will retain the three thovsand dollar ($3,OQ0} perforniance bond which it i�'-' .. presently holds to ensure perfornr�nce by the applicant consistent with all ''''- � representations made in the application including i�l�nentation of the restoration �i^:;';` ' plan revised 20 June, 1983 ��:?:_'. ; - this approval shall be subject to all requireme�ts of Section 5-503, Sand and Gravel . Regulations, of the Pitkin County I,and Use Code � ;•�°".'• '' - the hours of operation will be 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. At all other times the area +:� �:'�' � shall be securel locked � • ,<:;2!,�� Y c -�;=;:a - the access road shall be oiled periodically as necessary to control fugitive dust : � F.;;=�r,'i - the number of tsvck tri.ps will not eacceed fifteen (15) per day {''�"`.' - no on-site crushing of materia]s will be permitted �` :' - this peLntit shall be for a four (4) year period beginning on the date of approval ;L��"�' b tk� Boazd of Count Comnissioners .`„:: Y Y � ��A',� - the applicant shall in a timely manner file an application for an extractive pertnit w with the Colorado Mined Land Reclarmtion Board Y m 4:u-"-.� - the applicants shall prior to each anniversary of this approval file with the ��'� Planning OEfice a Statement of Continued Co[�Qliance with the conditions of this ��.s,. �:�_;, approval and with the representations made in the application. The annual Statement t.�.,;, shall include a description of the work which has been accoaq�lished on the property '�" during the past year including reclamation and revegetation efforts. In the event �'.ti�'.; r�'�- that the Planning Office fi.nds any deviations from the "conditions and represent- ;��z �,�:. ations" it shall report the info=mation to the Board of County Carmissioners at a �:,';,� regularly scheduled public [reetinq 'i.r.; �'" RicYman noted that the application was tabled at the previous meeting as there was - _�w,�.: ��=>�'' some concern with the sufficiency of the reclamation bond and as the applicant ,j Y,•:-: r�:;`;'t contested the trail dedication. Both issues have since been resolved; the Code only �,,,.;i �,-.:�; requires a trail dedication in conjunction with a subdivision, and the Environmental iN�.':'� �,�:-.,! Coordinator has since indicated that the perforna��ce bond would be adequate for the ...fy �_;;:i ' ' ;�n.i;'y� reclamation of the site. L' + County Attorney Wes Light asked if the applicant objected to the first condition ;� fi v'`.:j of approval, whereby the County would cont9nue to retain the perfoxmance bond. ��'"=` Applicant FYitz Benedict stated that he had no such objection. Benedict explained that G��;�'. Cf'��' the reclamation plan provides for a lake approximately five (5) acres in size, as �r�`' well as the recontouring and revegetation of the surrounding disturbed three (3) acres. �; ., �:'? �, �°"�' The Benedict's may consider the constxUCtion of a single family residence for their 4 i'.:;�' g., _ =:-''��-: own use, although they would prefer to donate the lake site to the Aspen Center for c,�'� ' � � ' Environmental Studies at some £uture date. Benedict explained that he may subdivide ,� E �' �;�.. +_< a portion of the twenty-nine (29) acre site, and that an application may be submitted �;��:: ; s-i��s 1}'.;:� '�.:.__;� r�.._.�- � �,. SOIOBt]IfiE 'tt]15 SIIIrt[1PS. y �-,r�� '�'� Kinsley moved appzoval subject to the nine (9) conditions noted above. B1aka seconded �� and the rtption passed unanimously. 7 �. Elk Alan Richman introduced the Elk Mountain Lodge application for its annual review. " Mountain Lodge Discussion was continued from the previous meetinq, at the request of the Buildi.ng r Department, to allow for verification that the redeveloprtient of the lodge was, in fact, ' aonsistent with previous appmvals, A site inspection was subsequently made, and the � Departn�ent was able to verify c�pliance. A special review pexmit for the redeveloprtient of the lodge was issued in 1979 ,i Crnmissioner's Meeting 27 Jime, 1983 - 4 �;�� °�t�, .:,�,:� ._. - :�, ;T>: • . ,�+_�:�, ,� . .. „ � , rt r£f"c�Jy �, j ... F= � },��,'�3 �� t�k'�"S k4 � 5af � F� ' .1 f ��.:kT� 5?��, Y� :su: � ,i t {l.•`2f��♦ � i�"{•e u�%�S��a"�Y�•r '�if• h a: ., � ,�,,,f+i �r s ,w,r iil'y'�I C `� �� '[ . s � ,�?a {� �`s_"�� 1�l��` '�``r} �) q;.x � r �. r �' � � •u�i�:..�1�"''_ti.l'�.�` _.._.,:.:.�..,4{�:��N `._;d.F....3�...,t�I �d_e_'�� ':w�.... - :..:�,%'�,"�::wet.'�.r''.'� � _ �,`. �^,:,: subject to various conditions, one (1) of which required an annual review. As the x,.; �,Y:� lodge has not been open for business, the Planning Office recamiended approval of the an::ual review subject to another annual review next year. i::; . . ;�,', , r: Blake moved approval subject to an annual review of the Elk Mountain Lodge in 1984, - ;�;�' a, `� Child seconded and the motion passed unanimously. , .� � "=Minutes The minutes of 16 and 23 May, 1983, were reviewed and approved as sutxnitted. �' i„ r. 6S __________ j `V Public County Attorney Wes Light introduced a notice of cla'vn pursuant to statute submitted � ��: _ t?`Ca[nent �„; by Woody Creek Electric. The notice was submitted in reference to snawplav damage 1� , ;�` allegedly caused by a Coimty snowplow; on 11 F�bruary, 1983, a County vehicle � '. �'" apparently snagged an werhanging pocver line in the Woody Creek vicinity, which line • ,_ , : `` was repaired by Woody Creek Electric at a cost of three thousand, four hundred and # .�:v�.��1=. fifty seven dollars and forty-one cents ($3,457.41). The notice of claim requested �`� payment of the abwe by the County within one himdred and eighty (180) days. `�� Light explained that the Assistant County Attorney investigated the matter, and ;;# �, �` determined that the subject power line was, in fact, lower than the statutoxy height. 4-` � "= As the subject line was i�roperly installed, considered negligence on the part of the installer, and as there was no evidence that the County was, in fact, at fault, � � m� �: Li ht reco[miended that the claun be disallowed. 4 �" Kinsley rtnved to disallow the Woody Creek Electric claim on this basis, Child :. seconded and the motion passed unanimously. � ,';;1 ----- 'a_ Ct.- �., ;? County Engineer Pat Dobie provided a status report on the spring nu�off. River �� :'� '?° flooding in Pitkin County was generally limited to various lower valley locations � �..._ ' t,� where some bridges and roads have been closed, including the Thomas Bridge, a section ��: � �: d•� of the lower River Road, and a portion of the Snanmass GYeek Ca�cg�ground road, whereas ��`;.•;-;.�:. 7� �'' ' sarn other bridges, including two (2) at Redstone Ranch Acres and the Hooks Bridge, ;;<•_::` i�` - k may be threatened. Both the Engineering Department and the Sheriff's Office have � ' f: initiated a monitering/inspection program on all bridges and dart�s subject to the ��= following priorities: priunai.y County roads and bridges, public and private dams, private bridges, and finally flood plains. In the event floodi.ng was to worsen, additional County resources would be deployed as follows: primary County roads and A bridges, heavily developed areas within the flood plain, including Lazy Glen, Jadwin, Phillips and Black Birch, private bridges within subdivisions, and finally i.solated residences within the flood plain. y Undersheriff Don Davis explained that contingency plans also provide for the .l, �`:t� Cannissioner's Meeting 27 Jime, 1983 - 5 f- p. ..<... ...�.� _. ..� �`' �,��:!. . , i ��. ` ,t � �'� \ �. 4 { .,t� �� f'�i`t A r r et N; 4�.. 1 . 1 S .�1 g. �Y� �c. � :Yj5� l�.'G..1,Y��.... � �� y`��n""�'��w' 4t+�� ; i os �t � v � ,.. � P .d, 7 ��yy y , } '.'� r��'� ��y.� Sl��r�fi,;_��4`fiJ f pK M �� t ," j `�� {.� � rfi ��,tYiiJ�i� t , r.a �` yf f � j_cv ri M'"a,� � # �f��;i3Oat� 5�.� 4 - 1 �kR'i+` •� kr�}: N�':�y � . y. T � v}l�33. ��'Yy�� Y ��'�,.5� ,�Yiy ,� 4.�. ...+f :E�t wk'i!d{W..�=.':� . �.�....J...t"'i�.2_...�,.: d: t..e4_tSJ. J' ._ . ..V. .:t�.� � ... �.. . .. . ..._ ... �:.,.��-'��-: !'i:_.� evacuation of residents in the event such was necessary; the Wildwood Inn, for {�'' �� instance, has agreed to provide up to one hundred (100) roort�s in the event flooding „n�'-`' t�,". ' criticall threatened an area. ,r. I y ,. �'� � Child suggested that it may be helpful to accaTQlish aerial photographs of areas � :: _� } +t� 1 that have experienced flooding to better identify floodplain locations. ` �,.' �. �nr F•i �~':1+j The Boazd generally supported the contingency plan identified by Dobie. i ,�="_� ' �.,-,',.•=� p.T4� � �t��•.:: '�'''"' Nicklos Klandenxi moved approval of a resolution granting general submission approval to the y',�.'� Lot ��ti} �::?:-^> Split Nicklos Subdivision. Blake seconded and the motion passed unanimously. b°"•. ,... ms:.a;-r.� ir: �. � ---------- �;rw:, ;�,:;::,� ;:F,�:.;�� . �°'_'"� LUC Child moved approval of a resolution amendin9 Section 20-1 of the Pitkin Cotmty ��.',�'.�S . "� �1Rlei1C�: `��•� FAR Land Use Code regarding floor area ratio requireJnents in the AR-1 zone district. ': .�M�, ' �,,,,,•={ Blake seconded and the motion passed with opposition from Klandexvd. � `d ---------- L•?ei:? •,��'. Council Kinsley moved to appoint Josephine Mann, Billie Erickson, Jetty Kelly, Sk�e.rron `•'"°,;� On ��:.. ! ,: Aging Salawich and Betty Erickson to the Council on Aging. Child sewnded and the motion •, �,�� Passed unanimously. 5:;::I '�='� ---------- �.��.: "� 1ST Finance Director Tom Oken introduced on first reacling a suppl�nental budget "b� ``-:``,•; Read: y=��="' Supp appropriation resolution which included the following: unanticipated expenditures of ' �`�:':�; ppprop " one thousand, one himdred and eighty-five dollars ($1,185) for a copiex' and two 't�a; �s,_, thousand, five hundred dollars ($2,500) for two (2) vehicles for the Building �,`.`;:i { : . ; , Departrnent, a forty-four thousand dollar ($44,000) revi.sion of sales tax revenue � , f � - i, '` pmjection due to lower than expected revenues in 1982, a reappropriation of three 1 h + ttyousand, seven hundred and fifty dollars ($3,750) for the 1981 Busway Study, twelve � � - � � r, thousand, five hundred and sixty-four dollars ($12,564) in additional revenue s;� � ' i representing funds collected by state lottery, and others. ��s� Blake noted that the resolution identified funds for the relocation of the Public � �°�L '�` Works Office to the Courthouse Plaza Building, at a oost of greater than si.xteen �_-�f. S;F:;: t��'" thousand dollars ($16,000). Rental costs for thi.s office, the District Attorney and �.' if,;,.'-� the Building Departnent would approximate forty thousand dollars ($40,000) this year, ��,..�^<:_ and Blake again urged that the Board consider the location of these offices within the �+��,; coirtrnmity center. �� Kinsley urged that the Board consider an election sometime this year; it was �r:x:, -";;� considered ifrg�erative that the County obtain sufficient funds so as to allav for ,�, �� i the provision of adequate services. ��:>. �i'.�c �,�,�,':tt County Manager Curt Stewart noted that the County would likely face serious cutbacks �'"1"�' '�F`� !�'�.� ��:ya I Y� :: .� . . ��'.' � - �t;yy,f.� . .. ' Y :'�,�.k ' Ml1-�4Gf .IM'"T i- f 1 N 4 �.i i �\t��S��.� �' * � : � . � )1 A �C�r"c*.'"�a��. K��'1a1 '" �.� ! !j 5 f�1 .� a�.�,W Mi '"� i�: � Y�'4 �,'fJ� . rr .�� '`"'�f ..,ajb '�'��}��"Y��i�i SI��-.'�$,'i r �-s.#It.-rG f �� l L (.'4�.i,t• ..��rt•X � ��i}4 i cE � )� rr T s {-t i � xit � �'��f� ;� �th,.ev >. F�, i A. t ��` '�3r a 4 �w.: 1q �� e� f�� t �� ,1 l. .��+{"��3k'd�:r:41..�:w+t�+d�erue� nb�Eo.C'-;�.�.s�'�`,'i�x-'.Yv.er..+:+JJa �a�A`rra.r..�. . ��i�� . I i:� ,.� +{.�' � yY.:. l next year in the event additional revenue was not pmvided. A presentation on the %�;`;::I financial condition of the County would be available for Board review by the end ��.� ii��:,1 of July. ; h�": ::A,'. �'�'ri Klandezvd then moved first readin a roval of the resolution, Kinsle seconded '� � 9 PP Y � Y '�� -� and the rrotion passed unanimously. � cr'�_:;� �.:,..;�`, ., _: � '"� ` ---------- �' '. e. _ �'`<��, 1�� 1ST Tom Oken introduced on £irst reading two (2) resolutions refw�ding the Aimort j+,�_: Reac3: '. Aixport revenue bonds. The refunding of the 1977 bond issue was initiated so that the holder .'�.;,. �e=':� Refund �"'-`' �tevenue of the bonds, the Central Bank of Denver, would a ee to chan es in the bo�d covenants. ;:�`-:-� 4r' 4 ` Bond �'��'�`�' cificall azy y ,�_;; Spe y, an amendrtient to the covenants was necess as the Count could not �y: �RY�� othenvise obtain insurance on the 1983 a' rt bonds. Bond insurance is limited to t:,:'4_, uP� s..>' {':�`:: �::�-.� new issues, and the 1977 issue is not insured; their refunding, which would benefit ,,;µ: i�"� the Central Bank, would then allow for their insurance. Oken explained that the w�'� debt service schedule for the refunding bonds was essenti.ally identical to the t�.._., �;=:�� existing schedule, and noted that the Bank has agreed to asstmie all issuance costs. ti,_=.:: �.;. , �•>"'. � The transaction would basically exchange new insured bonds for the 1977, uninsured �.r: �j:^?;. Z';:r`:< issue, and at no wst to the County, j�,; . �``� Blake moved first readi.ng approval oE both resolutions, one (1) authorizing the �r�,� issuance of aiuport refunding revenue bonds in the principal amow�t of one mi.11ion, `� �. v eighty-six thousand dollars ($1,086,000), and the other acaarding those bonds to C� � �`��~� E.F. Hutton and CarQany, Inc, Klanderud seconded and the motion passed unanimously. ?:.:,::�; ;r�-;r ;.,,:,:_: :�r�_ eY•5;; (Blake leaves) - jl�'$; . � �' ---------- • . . ,�.� �4.." �'"t -� 1ST County Attorney Wes Light introduced on first reading an ordinance providing for � - �ad: � '"` �� Water the disposal of certain water rights owned by Pitkin County to the ZWin Lakes ;r ' �' ' Rights � '. k:;-;::_`, :�,c�_;�. Reservoir and Canal Company pursuant to settlement of certain water rights litigation, �! ; �� : � . �,. ; The County filed for storage rights for the Roaring Fork, Grizzly and Lost Man � �-' �.,: �r Reservoirs in 1974 so as to preserve the recreational use of the above. AZthough the � ;• �L 3 - yR�"'��'I, filings were subsequently opposed by the Ztain Lal:es Reservoir and Canal C�any, the ` 4� `�tir �t ;� parties later settled in August of 1979; the CortQany agreed to the recreational use '�� of the above and to withdraw its o sition in exchan e £or which the Count a eed, .,�� PF� 4 Y 9r' � amongst others, to convey to the Co�any the subject water rights. Light explained `�k'r"; �va.... E�'�-` that Water Attorne John Musick has monitered the rfornance of the C an for �+:: Y Pe � Y �.•,, �f��" t� cortpliance with tY1e texms of the settlement, and it was his rec�a�rendation that the �,'��; ��'�';, subject water rights now be conveyed. =�: '�° Child moved appmval of the ordinance on first reading and to set a public hearing '�V' '�:'�"� for 11 July, 1983, at 11;00 a.m. Kinsley seconded and the motion passed unanimously. +•.�..... �-: ,*t±SiY, nE•r�• ---------- F�'�� i•F'�'�?..� Crnmissioner's Meeting 27 Jime, 19B3 - 7 �. � ;',;::�{�:: ,� r t W `;��" � �y� ' � t � L �} "�r�'S'32�r tx'•S s� �1 x ° y °� ti : ^ � ' 'i.�' ys.r�� r.�`;'`�rti: a f-cr.��$; �.1i' t��.�t �� i vd,. ``- t d fi 4�¢ . r � 3 i i+.��µ i�''x'�"��'��ZF��j�i`�� i�y�`��-S k�v�,�a(u��e a�3� �?M1'��L;� ua i ;,� t�L';'y!'��'��' '. � ir� �iu.c.r!5'.� tya�tvf`i..��axc.wr.r.:<'�ry '�}�¢��til:s'+.o�'.'iL .��-...'.,;4��..•a. �^3�.:..-� . u.. _; kf'r tF'�._ 4'�S e�' .(�� -,: ,. . .. ,�.��...� � •. i �•�::i .;.i ��` _j , �'* � �� 1ST County Engineer Pat Dobie introduced on first reading an ordinance pmviding for °��;?� Read: „;;.: >?-:� South the disposal by exchange of certain real propet.-ty aaned by Pitkin County to enable �-.;,.'• �"4`_ Avenue �r.� �`I RCW a settlement with respect to the border of that public right-of-way known as South �:i ; Avenue, The ordinance would provide for the exchange of certain small parcels of � v`� �ar�;j land between the County and Ellen Skufca, all of which would facilitate anticipated .r�, �c .n i�rovanents in the Smuggler area. A recent Home Rule Charter amenc�nent allows for ,�. �: ¢'° the disposal of public land other than public park and recreation land by ordinance �Y' �;_. i;r subject to a public hearing. . r:;,: �7� Kinsley moved first reading approval of the ordinance and to set a public hearing (::_ rt_ ;��; for 11 July, 1983, at 11:30 a.m. Child seconded and the crotion passed unanimously. �':>; ' _ _ , � ` --------- ' i � Relocate AiTmort Manager Dick Arnold intmduced discussion on the relocation of the glider ': r t;-, Gliders -' at operations to the south side of the runway. The proposal was initiated by the Y>'_i ��rt r,�,� glider operators, who have requested the use of a small meadow almost directly �,� across the rurnvay from the terminal. This particular area would enhance glider i . �^.:� � j_'„ ground operations and air traffic flow for the tower, while providing for less f },_ . ;_ ' �' conflict with existing aircraft ground operations. The meadow area, which would ', �.°. allow for access £ran Owl Creek Road, would be seeded and replanted for use next t' - sisnrer. Relocation would require the installation of a gate through the fence on �'. G: Owl Creek Road, and the use of a different grass seed mixture in the area, to be � ;r?.� .. a �� achieved by the County at a cost of approximately five hundred dollars ($500). a :�,. � � . . �, Arnold requested approval for the relocation of the glider operations on a trial � basis. � Glider operator George Gordon asked if the County intended to fence the entire � � meadaw area, as such would pmvide greater security for glider equipment. Arnold �¢• � ?' explained that there were no such plans to fence the area as the relocation was only ;} f•� � intended to provide a parking area for the gliders during the s�amer months. The � i� subject meadow could still be considered as open space. �"' r. �� Kinsley then moved that the Board support the Airport Manager in accarodating the glider operator's on the south side of the runway. He also noted that the relocation would further serve to accomodate anticipated aixport i�rovements. Child , sernnded and the motion passed unanimously. Glider operator Dieter Bibbig expressed some concern that he would be required to remit aixport rental fees for the month of September, as the aizport would be closed �` the entire month pending the co�letion of the phase one (1) inprovements. Arnold , explained that all aimort concessionaires are rern,ired to remit rental fees as the leases do not provide for short term closures of the facility. s� ---------- �: �•, � �� :.i°` . - ,,,:,. ;::!�,., ;?!, _ , ;�.� �r � • �. fi �� .�_�;�, •'� x.-�v� f�{�PS%� � _� �+�'r7; i��,,��'�1R�e� q�_� � -� r � '('pr rYi �1 4 I_,rh„a rS ar��• q� .�`�r��r �� ifa� '�a-r. C-:.��{�+i.�LY 5��Sktti j,Sl�i�i.�r1/��ttry t ,k:ri � j,�6 3. ��t Y�'r��'lt ��''.S.. �n . . n-5'w,.NA�a�'/....ti.��l�..._1:._.�.:..�:n=.d..:` . ., -"�at7'.�HS?v�..'roh. �,?.':.,;;.��.:.�..:..._.�r�u:,.., .... � 1'lY:c�i*':�fkF.,�t��°...�35 ... K. . ;��...,',� _ i ;��-` '. The joint City Council - Board of County Comnissioners meeting was convened. r, - ,y :. !,�:'�:,: - Tlwse present included Counci]members Bill Sterling, Chic Collins, Dick Knecht, il. Charlotte Walls a�d A1 Blomquist, and Board members Madsen, Blake, Kinsley, Klanderud � �r : �,' � and Child. � ' �: ':_�i_-.. . __________ 6. � � � . ,r � i. . i,., ,.`;� Smuggler Sterling introduced discussion on a joint City/County agreement governing i�rove- �,� � Area � _� Irtgrove ments to the Smuggler area. The i.ssue was discussed at a previous joint meeting and �� , - ! f° � Acgee �� I at a Council work session last week. The City has agreed to join in the necessary .� � J t � i�rovements in the area, although it was felt that such should be addressed in �r �� conjunction with long range plans/objectives for the neighborhood, including h � �� transportation, open space needs, capital i�rovements and econanic feasibility. ,�, . s�, t 4... � :� r Council would prefer to develop a co�rehensive plan for the Smuggler area, one fi'i` '� �'',� .� which �*r�� a review of the Centenni.al develapment by Council, the City Planning �,r � and Zoning Comnission and the Planning Office. There was some conceni, for instance, i � with maintaining quality of life goa]s in the area, and concern that develojxrnnt not � '.�` establish an �loyee "ghetto". The City would prefer to review the overall develop- +:'';:'�..`� t� ment of the Centennial project and become more involved in its planning. , � � ��"• Council has furthex agreed to share the cost of the i�rovements on an equal basi.s . ,a'. ':1 � with the County, and that said irtgrove�nents should cortgly with County standards. j' >,; ;;":. There was no consensus, however, on the phasing identified in the four (4) y2ar � ',,� reconstruction plan; specifically, i�rwements to Mill Street and its bridge were �'�'�'Y not considered a priority this year, even though County funds have already been � � - r� � appropriated for such. In the event the Mill Street u�g�rovements must be accongli.shed �` _ � � this year, Council would request that such be deferred as late as possible thi.s ` r. �;- swrtner so as not tu i�act the Visual Arts Center. � :' � , 'llie City can provide its share of the cost of the impmvements by increasing its �. - � � e R'� � _�.. ; property tax, an action which would not rern,ire voter approval, or by issuing General r;- �< � � Obligation Bonds, a course which would necessitate an election. In the event the City � . �`Y �'"'� pursues a bond issuance, consinered the most likely alternative, the ordinance .:��.- ��;<.;:!;. ��"�� rocedure would be followed. Such vrould re ire two (2) readin s and a ublic hearin w� P �N 4 P 9. ��t:^� such so that an election could be scheduled no earlier than September. ��'"re:;s:> . . �'''=`�� The City has irnestigated methods that would allaw for cost savings; an application ��:�� ,�{ has already been submitted for state funds for the reconstruction of the Nea1 -.a�i.;;-�: �•;`s;., � . ��;:� Street bridge, it has been agreed that lighting in the S�nuggler area would be Ai�,t=.',-� `'6`�"�'` connected to the Cit s te�n and f�ded b its Electric FUnd, and it was antici ted �.. Y YS Y Pa �:;,,� �'',. �'��: that some of the right-of-way to be a�i�ired for the i�rovements could be reduced. �.., T`�ii:i ��-%>=� An i�rovsnent district for the Smuggler Trailer Park was also considered as a treans of �� t�?�^ba:. l,�:;�;;=� Ca�missiar�er's Meeting 27 J�u�e, 1963 - 9 +.:�- �.., `, '�:;r, ' � �?� . . y �� r''i r�,�� . . a � K �kY�3 � �e �.._ -. �( i.. S 7 tft � '�• *' �,h.�, e +r �!:,� '1.ti4 F� -y�r�t��t{�F, y.�, ._ i�,�,7. '` �'a'� ti�� R US!* FA'�1 n!p� . � 1�I x y S' J�,t� f..L'h 4�� (y, �� ',R7� . 4-d y �+t!. :N A lHd:_ '��r��F�2�i'"T eµ��'�p�f 4v�fi �Fe�+ �: �� l • lx �.� �.rr e vr `�r .�TzE'Y 1.�3 (�� . y..fi r' � b k' � �.- !�'�rv��,� Y. � � ks B 7.` ,�F�'[ �r'.4 �XY1'}f�:.�4+� � 'r��[''�'`x�r,..'� '•1'wriaf4alafid1SK30a�TWas'i�ecv33wr:Sw.�°'••^ �� .�...s. , .�"-'��'.'^._ ..« ., . . ._. _.._ ._ , .. `i ,:° '� �:r, � .'?;. '' raising funds, although such was not considered feasible as residents have already '�j�'�-•' forned a di.strict for drainage and pavenent of the park. Council was generally n:,_:.: 4 13r�:�'`�.�.i . y�:: ,; supportive of the i�rovements program as noted abave, and has agreed that planning °y' �15� should proceed accordingly. � w�F' Blanquist e�ressed strong reservations with the phasing schedule, and suggested � �r: :*t.�;� that the second phase, including irt�rovements to Park Circle and the Centennial Roads, _ . �:�?� iP,��; be identified as the first priority. 6lanquist was concerned with a proposed wareh�use �3:`-:- =_�; project i.n the Mill Street vicinity, the cort�lexity of the open space issue, providing l�.;c:�� . t.�:..;�; . s'��=+. for a greenbelt in the area, integration with the trail system, and others. Pending ry- hii{:I ��:;'� �,,;::_ the resolution of these issues, it was not considered appropriate to expend funds in 4�''J"-''9 %q:�'i- '�"%`°�� the Mill Street vicinity this year. He was also concerned that the new Mill Street }_�:',_} " z;_,�`. ��_,:, Bridge would preserve the existing Red Mountain Itoad/Gibson Avenue aligcnrent; the '" 'r.��; r,,, : bridge could, for instance, be relocated so as to i�rave upon the subject aligm�ent. •'`4` Flsthexmore, inprovements to Gibson Avenue were not considered necessary this year i',-"_ ;'��.' ,':� as the County i�roved Lone Pine Road last year. �:':;',+� Kinsley was appreciative oE Council's interest and willingness to participate in G;�;;: • �„�: the i.�rovements program for the Smuggler area. He noted that the City was a ,;,;;-.. � _ participant in the process that led to the Centennial project, and that the develop- ; � ; ment has already received general sulxnission appzroval. �_ !�•;::: Knecht agzeed that the Mill Street 6ridge shouid be deferred to allow for additional 4,';';. � .,; review of park requisements, the bypass and the trail system, all of vzhich should 4�.,_ enhance quality of life goals and pedestrian access. He suggested that the remainder �f{�. of the phase one (1) i�rovements be accortglished this year, the cost for which would �� - be shared equally by the City and the County. The City could then proceed with a �. �$',..'.: : b • bond issuance for the rgnainder of its share of the project. � . '�"��:; Kinsley explained that the Mill Street Sridge was critical to the remiinder of �.., :, � the phase one (1) i�rovements. He noted that the Board strongly supported open �r �,. �.,::` .,'�_',• .: F=n� space, a greenbelt, and providipg linkage with the trail system, and that the �i; �aA:, �"` Smu lez rov�nents were actuall rioriti2ed on this basis, it was suggested that t;;;±r: 99 � Y P ��`��'•, the Board and Council cronvene a joint work session to review the i�rovements progr�n a�;' and the basis for the recam�ended phases. ';;t, County Engineer Pat Dobie explained that the phase two (2) irtQrovements include � i� :a�: on-site roads for the Centennial project. The construction of said roads could not 1. "� preceed the development of the project itself, and there are a nwnber o£ easements gs'� .1':+ ._� necessary for such that have yet to be obtained. Dobie recamiended that the Board y , ,,-;, proceed with i�rovanents to McLain Flats Road if the phase one (1) i�xovements i.::', '��`� were to be deferred. � rZ.: d:a: s.�%'�� ' ioner's tin 27 June� 1983 - 10 � � � .��._�_ ___� .� _ ___.._� �, , ::;:=;:�w� � . `, .. _ � t r �i .�. 3 . : ��L r . �,P � � '�{�y�j�.�'��Y��'`�� j"� „y!A 't �'`.S�4 � ��' . ..� �w�:. + s�-��i1 rM��5;� < + a-p.,t� cr+C i- w � �,�' t y� �r ,�.,� �': � ��+�� ` �r a* v� ��re< sY ��'�j�'ya ��'�`w'�yfli'.Yi�'��i�� f'�"Ma� Y��..; r..�,., tw..h��,� �,� � �.tp r t�jf��. ��` -w � � .7,,i�r�rdP �e!;� ' �..,.� f ��:esN'� r��".. > ��(�>d c . � ' �;� ... i�v,s..,.:.��... ��}xt�da��r:r �"F�..�.. _:r'�^-*'.,. ,�-_ R!�r�`"' !��+t�r+,:rt' .. .` i ;,�._:_;.,I •.,;;I �;_,"1 1,�,:[; `="� Blomq�ist expressed particular concezn that the review process for the SYnuggler t=, .'�=� i�rwements was not followed; the County Planning and Zoning Conmission, for it�:%:i ' S ,`�,._;::� i.q .. . � ; instance, did not participate in the review process in a constructive manner. r� Blomquist felt that providing for a greenbelt was the major issue of concern, �..� ' vK= s i�.` � _ �F• and irtg�zovements should not proceed pending its resolution. �1- ti.s•; �;.'` Klanderud lained that the lack of � u },�f, exp pedestian access in the Mill Street vicinity � ��;; was the basis for prioritizing those i�rovements this year. Specifications for tt� �' �T �.a. road and bridge i�mvements were, in fact, drafted to provide for pedestrian access I'=;? 44�;;; and trail ]inkage. � .. F�.� ��;_ ��:x. Walls suggested that reconstruction of tk�Mill Street Bridge proceed as planned, ' ?�.cr `_ �::.�,k: and that Gibson Avenue be eliminated as a tYmroughway. - _ � �': Snaiggler Trailer Park resi@ent Li.z Johnson requested that Gibsoa Avenue be �,� v="== maintained as a thorou ;;;.; gtxaay. a�`"-.' Stnuggler area resident Jon Busch agreed that the reco�m�ended �,;� inprovements were i;.': �',-; . well engineered, although there was some concern that these were not people-oriented. r!,_,:,:: !. Given the density of the area, he agreed that Gibson Avenue should not be closed. �:'i�;s: i ' �`"� I ' ,_;;::,: �nugqler area resident Joan Lane questioned the need for and the size of the i � I Centennial project. s;. 1 � r': Sterling explained that there was some concern the Phase IV pmject precipitated z; ��; ! .T',_'�,. ; G�`;: the first phase of the Snwggler irtq�mv�nents; it was felt that the new bridge and �=aY,;: the improvaments to Gibson, Red Mountain and Spruce Street were all oriented towards �'�� Centennial, He su pe p � � �-,.�;-: ggested that the develo r of the ro'ect contribute towards the cost � . � of these iutQmvements. � �„ 4 '. Council and the Board genaxally agreed to convene a joint work session on 2liesday, �4�r`.'.`s+I 5 July, 1983, in the Council Chambers at 10:00 a.m. This review was intended to L.S::,.i s`�,� address tsail linkage, maintaining the greenbelt, open space, and others. The Board � i }F .! would address the Centennial project, including those contributions to be made by the � � : lez*� devel r�;, �P�- �' t.w�:, ':� Dobie noted that the engineered plan for the S�nuggler area was drafted in 1::, i ;+� conjimction with all adopted plans, including the Greernaay Plan and the Trails � �{ - Master Plan. ��,; � ; , +� r s' Smuggler area resident Angie Griffith requested that all werhead pa,ver lines ; :z� ; ;�, in the area be buried. i ''•`•' Child suggested that the Hoard strive to encourage the City's participation in ^+;. the detailed submission review of the Centennial project. ::�. ...e . `"")' ---------- � ��i�k'r v�;,,� There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. �";�'� �:�..'.�� ---------- ;�- , ;;..�. .} � r..� ��n�r,'°' �44*f�V' � *s�+��,,,' }, ��/y�-. n Y7 .L . - �t. l'.�f�`' 'V'74�..�"f�F �J AMY� , s } , ."`e�,�. .; •�� : Myt' �Z � �� ?��•.. � thS,� � . �A � }t s�'y e, ��4t ,�r,��.. } � `{%� _�_ =,, .i _ ! �'} ,,, .. .. . .;;��;ti;1 � �vz` 3j� #�rtS �� :ry., ;�, � ^ ` S�: � � �� I( / _ r Y.. ., �i�t. L/a-��~J S r�T..' ��' ly g�mitted, � ��n ` ':µ Re^P� r e Ma � �v3.: (/ � . '� `fY Ii C�� ( J . f�. u u .�:; . � t .� � �.. �i � R�� 1 -��-' � � �:''.� �, � � �, a- J��.� ��,.L. � .S":.� . . .. ��_.y {fJ.ii _ � � � � `�� y � �� _ 27 Jt�r 1983 - � � � tin9 �. �ssi�� 5 ..�.�. ....�.�._ .. �,.�.�. �.,. _ __ _ 1983 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI5SIONERS PUBLIC HEARING EXHIBITS June 27 LeChamonix Nonconforming A Memorandum Dated June 27, 1983 from Richard Grice, Exem tion S ecial Review Planner,to Board of County Commissioners Stillwater Sand Pit Special B Memorandum Dated June 27, 1983 from Richard Grice, Review Planner,to Board of County Commissioners ; : �. 1 ,_ ; � , � .: �- .:, : E� ,� _... . � ` ` . � ..„ „��t �:<<,; E �,..€E`„�_€.` ,�. , '��..�... 30 ,, : • � �,:,..:�, c.; �o. cc:..., „�:; ' P[•F*.:iit CO3 , M9;MORANDUh1 I',tblic I3carzr.� i;.::iL±::s r:.:o EXH161T sub3c � TO: IIoarc� of Couni�y Commi.ssione�:s r�•li. I'ROM; Richard Grice, Planning Office�'' _g RE; LeChamonix Nonconforming Er.emption - 5pecial Review: Public Uear.ing DAT�: June 27, 1983 . The attached le.tter from Gideon Kauiman requests exem�tion from the limitatio�i on repairs, alterai:ions and r.esL-orati�n for {:lie noncon- forming use known as LeChnmonix Condominiums. LeChamonix is located across th� Marr.on CreeY, l:oad from the Aighlands base ar.ea and is zoned AP'-1. The apnlication is filed pursuant. to i:he recently adopted Shctior. 7-1.20 which created the procedur.c ioi the exemption requested. (A copy oL- Section 7-1.7.0 is included in your packet.) The code am�ndn�ent required that f.indinqs be made wii:h respect: to tl�e iollowing, �•ritcria: 1. "[ahether the use has adverse impacts upon the neighbor.hood or L-hc County as a whole, as measured by the decree to whicli is ol-herwisc co�aplies with the policies and general regulations of the I.and Use Code, i:he provisions of Articly 7 not�aiL-h- standing, or the er.i:ent to which reasonablc measures have or �aill. bc ta}:en to mitigatc such adverse impacts, includiny any assurances given by the applicant to undertalce or continue such measures. . 2. �ahetl•�er the use is comp�i:ih?_e with any adopied ].and use �lan for thr area and with adjacent l�nd uses and zoiie distric:ts. 3. �4hcther the applicant has demonsi:rated thai the purpose ci ihe exemption is to allota the use to meet basic li.fe, healih and safety requirements of ihe Building Code or is to meet Pr�ctical diificuliies and hardshi.ps which arise i•rom ihe exist:ing restrictions upon its repair, alteration or xestora- tion." No adverse impacts upon the neiyhborhood or the County were identified by ihe reierral agencies and the Planning Office is not aharc oi any significant adverse impacts. Clearly, the project is inconsi_stent wii:h the County scenic quality policy. We consider this an acc�ptable impact consideriny the location of i:his property and its pliysical relationship L-o the IIighlands base area. To the casual obscrver it anpears to be an integr.al part of t)ie base area. This particular piece of property has many features in common taith the base arca anc3 its AR-2 zoning, although it also has many aspects �aPiich conform to ihe AI'-1 zone. You wi1Z recall from the recent review of the HeaL-her.bed GMP application that ilie master plan identifies an.area ot one quarter mi.le radius of the Highlands base area as appropriate for. tourist- accommodations. LeChamonix lies within i:he one quar.L•er mile radius and is boi=h physi- cally and topographica111 contiguous iv the base ar.ea. In other. 4�ords, ihis property's locatiw7 bears a reason�ble relationship to the base area. The pri.mary r.eason for the exemption request is to enable the owners � of tlie property to obtain adequate insurance ccverage. Insurance companies have been reluctant to pr.ovicle i.nsurance on the building considcring ihe lirnitaL-ion on repairs, alteration and resi:orai.ion imposed by tl�e nonconiorming �ection of the Land Use Code. Ilowever, according to P�tsy Netabury, tlier.e are "life, healih and safety" concerns as well. A part of the foundation has become er.posed and therefore structur.al improvemeni•.s wi7.1 be necessary to the foundaiion in i:he near Luture. .. �,�.) ..� � Memo: LeChamonix Nonconforming Exemption � Page Two June 27, 1983 ' ' . This application does not propose modification of the general configuration of LeChamonix. In order for modification to occur, it would be necessary for the applicant to submit plans for review for determination that the proposal otherwise complies with the policies and geeeral regulations of the Land Use Code. Therefore, the Planning Office recommends approval of this exemption from the limitation on repairs, alterations and restoration provided there shall be no extension or expansion of the use by an increase in the floor area or number of dwelling units unless the Building Inspector determines that an insubstantial increase to the floor area is necessary to meet the life, health and safety requirements of the Building Code, and no modification to its general configuration may take place without its prior review by Planning and Zoning. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Commission reviewed this application at their regular. meeting on May 10, 1983 and endorsed the Planning Office's recommendation of approval. � � '� . � rot�r,� or� c�. co::::°,:�,; � ' PITI(Ili C0. MEMORANDUM PuUl +- • ncto EXHIBIT ' sub3 � � TO: Board o£ County Commissioners F==��• _� FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office RE: Stillwater Sand Pit - 5pecial Review DATE: June 27, 1983 ' � This applications requests approval for a sand and gravel pit opera- tion on property owned by Fritz and Fabienne Benedict, east of Aspen. The total ownership contains 29+ acres, however, only 8.5 acres will ' be disturbed by the extractive operation. . The operation will consist of sand and gravel extraction, with washing and grading according to aggregate size being the only processing • required. There will be no rock crusher used, thereby avoiding the noise and dust usually associated with gsavel pits. This small scale operation will generate no more than 15 truck trips per day. The application commits to a periodic oiling of the existing • access road to suppress the fugitive dust which will be generated by the truck traffic. The access road is the one which currently provides access to the Shimer Apartments and intersects Highway 82 a short distance west of Lupine Drive. Lupine Drive is the entrance to the Mountain Valley 5ubdivision. The permit is requested for a four year period. } The reclamation plan calls for a 5+ acre lake as a final product along with recontouring and revegetation of the surrounding disturbed 3 acres. The revegetation plan includes a mix of conifers, native grasses and flowers as well as provision for the maintenance of the restored veqetation. _ � It has been pointed out that trail dedications per Section 5-501.11 are required only for subdivisions. If you read the following paragraph, you will see that this is the case: � "All applications for subdivision approval af residential sites or improvements shaZl be subject to the following land dedication or 'cash payment in Iieu thereof, for the purpose of acquisition of land for active an8 Qassive parks, recreation and trail pur- � , poses and for capital iacprovements to any park and recreational � lands or trail systems." � It is therefore clear that the requirement of trail dedication would not �e an appropriate condition for this approval. . �. Mark Fuller has reviewed the amended reclamation plan and has found it f to be satisfactory. Mark feels that the $3,000 bond which the County is I curreMtly holding for the reclamation of this site will be adequate to � : reclanm and revegetate the 3 acres which will need restoration following the c�rssation of the extractive operation. The P�iamning Office recommends approval�of the application subject to the fo,L9.owing conditions: I l. The County will retain the $3,000 performance bond which � it presently holds to ensure performance by the applicant i consistent with all representations made in the application � it►cluding implementation of the restoz'ation plan revised June 20, 1983. � c � Memo: Stillw�ter Sand Pit . Page Two ' June 27, 19E13 2. This zpproval shall be subject''to all rcquirements of Section 5.503, Sand and Gravel Reyultitions, of the Pitkin County 7�and Us� Code. 3. The liour.•s of operation will be f3:00 a.►n. - 5:00 p.m. A� all other times L-he area sl�all be securely locked. 4. The access road shall be oil.ed periodically as necessary to conirol fugi.tive dust. 5. The number of i-ruck irips will not eaceed 15 per day. 6. No on-site crushing of.materi.als will be permi.ti:ed. 7. This permit shall be for a four year period beginning on khe date of approval by tl�e l3oard oi County Commissioners. S. The applicant shall in a timely manner fi.le an application , for an extractive permi.t with the Colorado DZined Land Reclamation Board. . 9. The applicants sha11 prior to each anniversary of ihis approval file with the Planning Office a Statement of Continued Compliance with the conditions of this approval and witli the represeni.ations made in the applicati.on. The annuaJ. Statement shall include a descript5.on of the work which lia� been accomplished on the properL-y during • the past year including reclamation and r.evegetaL-ion eif.orts. ' In th� eveiit that the Plznning Office finds any deviations £rom the "conditions and representations", it shall report the information to the Soard oi County Commissi_oners at a regularly scheduled public meeting. I . ` � ' � , ; i ;` � . �. , � � • � The Aspea Times r�o1:r,D o� co. co:.::,�,,�; Box E rZTxirt co. PuUlic Fiearir.g T;;:::1bit� Aspen, Colorado �,LLta 6�2��83 w SuU3 oct . _LE G7-1AMONTx_ PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ) COp�/ Of NOtICe ) ss. County of Pitkin ) . I� j+/111.�a.II! A. Dunaway do solemnly sw•ear that - �- �� '"-� ` �� •: public notice .� I am the p�1tL.'�S.L�p�'' of THE ASPEN TIMES; �f • rust,tdxartCe ' ��' that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, 1 RE:Le Chamoai,c Nonanrm+nins Exempuon— Speci.t Reviavr. and published in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has ` NOTICE IS HEREBY GtVEN tJut i'public• I heari wil!ha'.beW beCo»the Hoard d CouMr a general circulation therein; that sald newspaper has been pub- com ,��ionen of Pitkin Count�,Colondo 00 lished continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitkin, �tona.y�June 27 1883 at a meet+ng�W beKin at 1000■m in thn Gjommiri�erd lKeetl Raom of for a period of more than fiftydwo conseculive weeks next prIor � et�e[�iet�nCo�eycoucu,wse.eosE�r.�+sueN. to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- • umi�a�nr�"�`n i�m.�n�n�. for the nanconfotmiry�we knovm�i t1�e I.e Ch�• ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States �monum�aominiums.'rde ineonuro�d mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of s�«��Y� �'t-t.2o� Lnd u�e Cade w�hich aeatcd the proocdure rortbe March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said ACWS- e:emption reqneded.Forfurlher id'oroylion, anted the Plmnfna Ofia:130 S Gelma 8ueet. paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal A��:az5�zo2o.ese228.;,.,sy�, �• notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the �. � •�' ch�em:s;�orc�ir State of Colorado. � � � � "�"";'"• ��iO"�° Published in the Aepeq'f��,l�mes:on�(�7 28.19&i. . . . . ..._. � ..:�A.►.. � . Th�t the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every� number of said weekly newspaper for the period of � consecutive insertians; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated r�iay 26 n.D., 19 83 and that • the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news- paper dated A.D., 19_ � �/i��22�C1/!/- Subscrlbed and sworn to before me,.a notary public in and for the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, this �.�,day of �\vVt�-- A.D., 19 _v--� ��C�� C1�:,.s�.Q-.��'��G� Notary Public My commission expires � �� C��t �1�: z . \�'�'�c��.� ' \1t� �� ( �:. ��i�� , The Aspea Times fi01�£,D Oi� C0. GG::.I'i.'.� • BOX E PITICIII C0. PuUlic Hear9.a� �•�=��='�� Aspen, Colorado �;,to �: 6�/�3-------'-"' SuU3�ct :AI�$�NRS` PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ) C0�7�/ Of Notice ) ss. County of PStkin > public notice � I� W i 11 iam R. Dunaway do solemnly sw•ear. that Notice i.he P��NOTICE � rebyg�ven lhat the Boerd of Coun�y ' Commiesionen of Pitkfn County,Colorndo will hold a publie heering�t 2 pm oa Jurre ZT 19�3,in I am the Pub�.�SheY' of THE ASPEN TIMES' lhe commixionen'mcepag.roan nt tl�e courl- � houaer coacerniog the iuuanae af ib Afrpott Re• that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, fund�ng Rerenue sooa, �n ehe amount.of E1.086,000 The_pu�poee of the bonds io b refund � and published in the Counly of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has stos,00D of 19TT Airporl Revmue Anticipntion Warranb and f9B1,000 of Airport Retunding Re-� a general circulation therein; that satd newspaper has been pub- aenuebonde,s�r�e.�srrp.�,c�wnaew;ubePey- Iished continuousl and uninterru tetlly in said Count OI Pit1C1I1 :�blcrolelyfromairpoRrevenues.pllpernonxwith. Y P Y � diflering viewe w�ll he given an opportunity io be for a perIod of more than fiftytwo consecutive w�eeks next prior hG6�- -�.�•�—>-� - - - ;r,Hf.ordErpfthe Bmrd ofCowly Commieeionen.' to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- ±:,:R' - -.-�nua eenn��: k � y ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the Un{ted Slates e�tiii�t3n'_'tlwA�c�.7imceJune91983C1erk' mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of � March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements with the meanins of the laws of the State of Colorada That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and enlire issue of every� number of said weekly newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive. insertions; and that the first publicatian of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated `r�e 9 A.D., 19��, and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news- paper dated A.D., 19_ �� j ; SubscrIbed and sworn to before me,.a notary public in and for ; • the County of PItkin, State of Color this �, day of i j A.D., 19 I i Notary Public � ^ � My commission expires �� '" � � I ' �