Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.264334416100 (3)DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT N THE FOLLOWING ORDER INFORMATION LISTED BELOW Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and /or P &Z Ordinance for the BOCC and /or P &Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat(s) PARCEL ID: 2643 - 344 -16 -100 DATE RCVD: 12/19/2003 # COPIES: CASE NO P146-03 CASE NAME: Nextel Special Review for a Telecommunication Facility Planners jEzra Louthis PROJI ADDR: 0255 Sage Way Lot 1 Blk 1 North Forty OWN /APP: I Nextel West Corp I ADR 333 Inverness Dr. Sout C /S /Z: Englewood, CO 801 PHN: 303 - 472 -2148 REP: Justin Robinson 'i: R. 333 Inverness Dr. Sout C ! Englewood, CO 8011 PHN: 303 - 472 - 2148//7 Email Addr: I robinson @nextel.com // T: __j j TP LLOCATED HOURS:-5 FEES DUE: $1441 FEES RC $1441 # 16345 % OVER: 5.7 on . REFERRALS I Communications Engineer, Zoning, Airport, North 40 HOA REF: 1/13/2004 BY J. Taylor DUE: 2/6/200 4i MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED DATE OF FINAL ACTION: 2/24/2004 2/25/2004 1yes 1 1124/2004 BOCC Reso: F- F- F- BOCC Ord: REMARKS WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT 2 /24 /04 /JT / /no refund no PZ: vesting HRG OFF: �I CLOSED: 1 2/24/2004 BY: J. Taylor HO INDEX: ADMIN: RECORDED PLAT PLAT (BK ) V APPROVAL DATE: VREXPIRES: �bD R MIN INDEX: III Ir" CASE TYP: Special Review CASE TYPS: CASE TYP2: CASE TYPE: CASE TYP3: CASE TYP7: 11 CASE TYP4: Date Scanned: 3/20/2012 File Location: IFF Box #198 FEB- 24. 2004 12:33PM D Tetra Tech COmmUnloation Servfees 333 Inverness Drive South Englewood, Co 80112 303 -721 -4095 303- 721 -3944 City Of Aspen Planning Department Ezra Louthis Dear Mr. Louft, N0. 4838 P. 2 Upon learning yesterday that the planning Department will not recommend approval, with regret I write you this letter withdrawing our application for Special Review of Nextel's proposed telecommunications facility at the Colorado Mountain College. 'Without the support of your office and that of the North Forty Homeowners, Tetra Tech utrderstands that the Board of County Commissioners will deny the application at the hearing tomorrow. I feel interests would be best served by not proceeding with the proposed design at this location at this time. However, I continue to believe it is in everyone's best to work together to design a site that will provide Nextel with tiro coverage necessary to serve the members of your community and that is agreeable to the Planning office and the Board. Rather than waste your office's and the Board's valuable time at the hearing tomorrow, I would like to schedule some time (next week ? ? ? ?) to sit down with you and (to the extent you think it is appropriate) any members of the Board to discuss an alternate design or location for Nextel's telecommunications facility. Your time and effort is greatly appreciated, and I look forward to working with you towards a common goal, Tbank you for your help in this matter, Lowell Nelson Market Team Lead 00000; 4 3-7 -4 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners Regular Meeting — February 25, 2004 THRU: Cindy Houb� l unity Development Director FROM: Ezra Louthis, Planner RE: Nextel Special Review for a Telecommunications Facility SUMMARY: The Applicant is requesting Special Review approval pursuant to Code Section 3- 210 for the construction of a wireless telecommunications facility, including three 8' whip antennas (two inches in diameter) and a 15' X 20' equipment shelter to be built at the Colorado Mountain College Aspen Campus. The equipment shelter would be attached to the southwestern (Highway 82 side) exterior of the existing building and would be approximately 14' tall. The three antennas would be placed along the spine of the CMC building (tallest point of the roof), and extend to a height of 38'. APPLICANT: Nextel (Tetra Tech, Inc.) REPRESENTAIVE: Mike Sharlow LOCATION: Colorado Mountain College adjacent to the North 40 Subdivision; 0255 Sage Way ZONING: AH2/PUD BACKGROUND: The CMC is located on Lot 1 of the North Forty PUD. In 2000, Sprint applied for a similar request to place a wireless telecommunications facility at CMC. The request was denied pursuant to BOCC Resolution 065 -2001 (see Attachment A) based on the finding that such a facility is not consistent with the intent of the zone district. REFERRAL COMMENTS: The application was referred to the Pitkin County Zoning Officer, but no comments were received. All referral comments received are attached. • Phil Shultz, RFTA Manager of Radio, stated that due to the similarities in frequency between Nextel and the radio operations of RFTA and Holy Cross Electric, they are opposed to the application. • North Forty HOA opposes the application due to health and visual concerns. STAFF COMMENTS: Special Review Standards Section 3 -210: A telecommunication facility is considered a Special Review Use within the B -2 zone district and is subject to the following standards pursuant to Section 3 -210 of the Land Use Code: A. The special review use shall consider: -000002 The applicable County Master Plan; Response: The Colorado Mountain College lies within the Urban Growth Boundary that has been identified in the 2000 Aspen Area Community Plan. It does not appear that the proposed antennas violate any polices outlined in the AACP. The college was approved as part of the North 40 development project. The North 40 development does have architectural standards. 2. County Land Use Policies in Article 2; Response: The proposed addition is consistent with applicable Code Policies in Article 2 3. The intent of the zone district in which it is proposed to be located; Response; The intent of the AH2/PUD zone district is to "provide for the use of land for the production of Category 1, 2, 3, and 4 affordable housing and resident occupied units and lots (as defined by the Housing Authority Guidelines of the Aspen/ Pitkin County Housing Authority) within the Aspen Metro area. The zone district also permits a limited component of free market units to off -set the cost of developing affordable housing. It is contemplated that land may also be subdivided in connection with a development plan." Additionally, "the Affordable Housing (AH2/PUD) Zone District is intended for residential use primarily by permanent residents of the community. Recreational and institutional uses customarily found in proximity to residential uses are included as special review uses. Commercial uses which are accessory to the housing development are also included as special review uses." Although some commercial uses are listed as Special Review uses, radio transmitters or cellular facilities are not included in the Special Review use as they are in other zone districts. It is Staff's belief that a wireless telecommunications facility is not consistent with the intent of the zone district. 4. The character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhance the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the proposed parcel for development; Response: The proposed antennas will not enhance the visual quality of the surrounding area nor will it highly degrade it. The proposed use is not consistent with immediate residential neighborhood. B. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed special review use must be in harmony with the surrounding area and minimize adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties. Response: The proposed facility may have minimal visual impacts on the surrounding environment but will not be in harmony with surrounding development. The proposal will not adversely effect pedestrian or vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations, and odors on the parcel or surrounding properties. 01 C. There must be adequate public facilities and services to serve the special review use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools. Response: The location currently provides adequate services to support the proposal. D. An application for a special review use must demonstrate to the Board of County Commissioners that the proposed development will not: 1. Materially endanger the public health, safety or welfare; and 2. Substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property. Response: The Applicant has argued that installation of this facility will enhance community safety by providing additional cell phone coverage along the Highway 82 corridor. Although no studies have been provided to state whether or not the proposed facility is safe, the Homeowner's of the North Forty Subdivision do not feel comfortable with the potential safety issues raised by such a facility (e.g. "harmful waves "). There is no evidence to substantiate that properties will be devalued from the proposed development. SCENIC OVERLAY (SECTION 3- 60-040 The Colorado Mountain Collage falls within the State Highway 82 Scenic Overlay zone, therefore the Applicant is required to meet the criteria for the overlay zone for the proposed development. Section 3- 60-040 of the Land Use Code establishes the following review criteria for development within scenic overlay areas. 1. Whether the proposed development has utilized existing topography and natural vegetation, such as ridges and hills to screen buildings to the maximum extent possible. Response: The antennas will be mounted flush against the exterior wall of the college and will extend 8' above the ridge or spine. The accompanying equipment cabinets will be located within an addition that will be constructed adjacent to the pottery area/dumpster structure on the west end of the CMC building. There are no existing topographic features such as ridges and hills, aside from what currently exists, which will be utilized to provide additional screening. 2. Whether the proposed development has been designed to complement the natural topography of the land, including, whenever possible and appropriate, the utilization of innovative architectural techniques such as earth sheltered design, natural materials and coloring, non- reflectability and clustering of structures on the least visible portions of the site. Response: The antennas will match the color of the existing building. The proposed addition which will house the equipment cabinets will utilize the same exterior and roofing materials as the existing pottery area/dumpster structure. 3. Whether the proposed development's height and bulk has been designed to avoid, to the maximum extent possible, the visibility of buildingsfrom the highway and public viewplanes. 000004 M Response: The antennas will extend beyond the height of the CMC building, but will only be 2" in diameter. The proposed addition to house the equipment cabinets will not extend beyond the CMC building. 4. The proposed structure shall be placed so it does not break a ridgeline, unless there are no alternate building sites on the lot. Response: No ridgeline area will be broken. S. Whether the proposed development has avoided the location of uses on the highest ground or most visible portion of the site as viewed from State Highway 82 and public rights -of -way, identified in Section (B)(1). Response: The proposed equipment storage addition is not located on the highest ground of the property or the most visible portion of the property as seen from State Highway 82. The antennas will extend to be. the highest point on the property 6 Whether the proposed development has been located outside of the designated Scenic Overlay or on a suitable site at the greatest distance possible from State Highway 82 and identified ridgelines. Response: The entire property is located in the State Highway 82 Scenic Overlay zone. 7. Whether the proposed development has been landscaped in accordance with the adopted State Highway 82 Corridor landscape guidelines and has preserved natural vegetation, to the maximum extent possible, including the avoidance of development within irrigated meadows. Existing vegetation shall be maintained to the maximum extent possible, while using existing vegetation to screen development. A landscaping plan shall be submitted by the applicant and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Response: The objectives of the State Highway 82 Corridor Landscape Guidelines are to preserve historical rural character, preserve spacious open views, preserve the natural ecosystem of the corridor, landscaping should be self - maintaining. The Colorado Mountain College has a landscaping plan which as been partially installed. As part of the proposed addition for the equipment cabinets, some vegetation around this structure will be lost. The Applicant has agreed to replace the lost vegetation. 8. Whether the proposed development's exterior lighting has been designed in such a manner that light sources, such as facade and landscape lighting, will not be seen from public rights -of -way as identified in Section (B)(1). In addition, an application shall be consistent with the lighting regulations identified in the Pitkin County Land Use Code. Response: The Applicant has proposed lighting triggered by motion - sensors. The lighting must comply with the standards of the Land Use Code. 9. Landforms and earth moving shall generally not be acceptable as the sole measure of compliance with these regulations. However, they may be utilized in conjunction with other site techniques designed into the development plan. These methods maybe acceptable when utilized as 000005 one of several methods to complement and enhance development, rather than as the single device for screening development from view from the State Highway 82 Corridor and as mapped. Response: No landforms or earth moving is proposed as part of this application. 10. Whether the proposed development has been designed so as to avoid, to the maximum extent possible, any Scenic Viewplane identified on the State Highway 82 Corridor Master Plan and Down Valley Comprehensive Plan. Response: There are no Scenic Viewplanes mapped for this area. IL In the case where 1041 hazard areas may be in conflict with preservation of scenic areas, the Board acknowledges that 1041 issues take precedence over scenic concerns. These issues shall be reviewed on a case -by -case basis. Response: There are no 1041 hazards associated with the proposed development activities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the BOCC deny the Nextel Special Review for a Telecommunications Facility located at Colorado Mountain College due to the facilities' inconsistency with the intent of the AH2/PUD zone district and the potential conflict with RFTA radio operations. ATTACHMENTS: 1. BOCC Resolution 065 -2001 2. Phil Shultz's Memo 3. North Forty HOA Letter ii 111• ATTACHMENT_ �A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PTTKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, DENYING SPECIAL REVIEW AND SCENIC OVERLAY REVIEW APPROVAL TO SPRINT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TELECOMMUNICATION ANTENNAS ON THE COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE Resolution No. 045 - 2001 RECITALS 1. Sprint ( "Applicant") has applied to the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado ( "BOCC ") for approval to install 6- telecommunication antennas mounted flush against the exterior wall of the Colorado Mountain College (CMC), as well as approval to construct a 20' X 20' addition adjacent to the existing pottery area/dumpster structure on the west end of the CMC building for the location of seven equipment cabinets. The property is located at 0255 Sage Way and is more specifically described in Exhibit A. 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission ( "Commission ") at a regularly scheduled meeting on January 2, 2001, reviewed the application, and forwarded a recommendation of approval with conditions to the BOCC. 4. The BOCC heard this application at a duly noticed public hearing on March 28, 2001, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to this application. 5. The BOCC finds that the Applicant's proposal is not consistent with the intent of the AH2/PUD zoned district. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners that it does hereby deny Special Review and Scenic Overlay Review approval to Sprint for the installation of telecommunication antennas on the Colorado Mountain College NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES ON THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2001. DENIED ON THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2001. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WKIN CO TY, COLORADO � A� Ar 6 6* A - 4^ 4ee Dean Michael C. Irela d, ounty Clerk Chair 000007 Date: &L o%g''� 111111 11111 111111 111111 111 111111111111 III 11111 1111 III 433808 04/25/2001 03:47P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 3 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Resolution No. -04$- 2001 Page 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: John Ely, Cindy Houben, c, County ey Community Development Director Case #P148 -00 264334416100 dill• 453811 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111 433808 04/23/2001 03:47P RESOLUTI DAVIS 2 of 3 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO m A'. aw;-Zoo1 FXIMb&A L yt 1, Block 1, 1ST ANIDNEMENr M THE PLAT OF NO[M FORTY P.U.D. SUHDMSICN, according to the Plat thereof filed February 9, 2000, in Hook 52 at Page 47. 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I111 463808 04/25/2001 03:47P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 3 of 3 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO OUQUD Phil Schultz, 12:28 PM 2/19/2004, Nextel and RFTA 0 Page 1 of 2 Subject: Nextel and RFTA Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:28:34 -0700 R 1 Thread- Topic: Nextel and RFTA ATTACHMENT 6 thread - index: AcP3HpDlgisrkY9SQoWuOA +hp8a4zA == From: "Phil Schultz" <pschultz @rfta.com> To: <ezral @ci.aspen.co.us> X -MX -Spam: final = 0.0100000000; heur = 0.5000000000(0); stat = 0.0100000000; spamtraq- heur= 0.5000000000(2004021903) X -MX- MAIL -FROM: <pschultz@rfta.com> X -MX- SOURCE -IP: [64.233.90.8] X- MailScanner- Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X- MailScanner: Found to be clean Roaring Fork Transportation Authority 0051 Service Center Drive Aspen, CO 81611 January 29, 2004 Greetings, I'm writing in conjunction with the meeting on February 25, 2004 of the Board of County Commissions, to consider the application of Nextel to build three cell phone towers on the Colorado Mountain College building at the North Forty. The Roaring Fork Transportation Authority and Holy Cross Electric (the radio system serves both RFTA and Holy Cross) both object to the construction of the cell towers. The RFTA radio system operates in what is called the 821 Megahertz range. In the past several years Nextel has been identified as the source of interference with public service radio systems throughout North America that operate in the 800 MHz range. The proximity of the Nextel cell towers to the Aspen Bus Maintenance Facility would likely hinder our dispatch radios and portable radios . Nextel is well aware of the problem and are currently trying to get the FCC to move all public service radios off the 800 MHz range (it has made an offer of $825 million to move the current users to another frequency). Nextel has presented a plan to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for its solution to the interference. However, the artfully named "Project Consensus" is a plan for the future, and has not been approved by the FCC. RFTA is concerned with current conditions whereby Nextel proposes to place a tower with a strong signal, a short distance from our dispatch facility, at a higher elevation. The Roaring Fork Valley is a difficult environment for radio communication under the best of circumstances. Nextel's proposal is a recipe for interference, and it should not be allowed to harm a local public transportation provider on vague assurances that it will fix any problems when they come up. Sincerely, Phil Schultz 0 U 0010 RFTA Manager of Radio Printed for Ezra Louthis <ezral @co.pitkin.co.us> 2/19/2004 02/11/2004 00:07 BOCC Ezra Louthis 920 -5439 fax 9709251252 F AND R PROPEP- TS North 40 Homeovmer's Association Adam Rothberg 171 Riverdown Dr. Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925 -1817 Dear Ezra and the BOCC, PAGE 02 ATTACHMENT The subject of placing cell phone transmitters upon the CMC has arisen before. We, the hundreds of people living at North 40, maintain our opposition to such a proposition. We, adamantly oppose the placement of any transmitter, relay device, or cellular phone peripheral equipment, which we find to not only be an eyesore, but may emit harmful waves of any sort. We are also concerned with the precedent that these proposed placements may establish, therefore, the homeowner's board is unanimously opposed to any company placing said equipment on top of the CMC. This, of course, includes the current proposal from Nextel. Should it be necessary for the board to attend a meeting to voice our concerns, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely dam Rothberg Vice president North 40 homeowner's association Ou0011 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, DENYING SPECIAL REVIEW AND SCENIC OVERLAY REVIEW APPROVAL TO NEXTEL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TELECOMMUNICATION ANTENNAS ON THE COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE Resolution No. -2004 V9 x9i 10 IfIl 1. Nextel ( "Applicant ") has applied to the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado ( "BOCC ") for approval to install 3- telecommunication antennas on the roof ridge of the Colorado Mountain College (CMC), as well as approval to construct a 15' X 20' addition adjacent to the existing pottery area/dumpster structure on the west end of the CMC building for the location of equipment cabinets. 2. The property is located at 0255 Sage Way and is more specifically described as Lot 1, Block 1 North Forty PUD Subdivision. 4. The BOCC heard this application at a duly noticed public hearing on February 25, 2004, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to this application. 5. The BOCC finds that the Applicant's proposal is not consistent with the intent of the AH2 /PUD zoned district. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners that it does hereby deny Special Review and Scenic Overlay Review approval to Nextel for the installation of telecommunication antennas on the Colorado Mountain College building. 00 0 -12 Resolution No. - 2004 Page 2 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES ON THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. DENIED ON THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2004. ATTEST: Jeanette Jones Deputy County Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John Ely, County Attorney Case #P146-03 264334416100 OUGG13 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Dorothea Farris, Chair Date: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: C {� — -� 0 Cindy Houben, Community Development Director In Page 1 of 1 Subject: BOCC Land Use Public Hearing - Nextel Special Review for Telecommunications Site - Aspen Airport Business Center To: <ezral @ci.aspen.co.us> Cc: <pschultz @rfta.com> To: Ezra Louthis, Planner E -mail: ezral @co.pitkin.co.us Pitkin County Community Development From: Kevin Milner, Telecom Technical Advisor Holy Cross Energy Re: BOCC Land Use Public Hearing - Nextel Special Review for Telecommunications Site - Aspen Airport Business Center Date: February 23, 2004 Holy Cross Energy wishes to file a brief comment on the above referenced application. As the electric utility serving most of the unincorporated areas of Pitkin County, including the Aspen Airport Business Center, Holy Cross communicates with its operations personnel with a private 800 MHz trunked radio system. This system was engineered and constructed in 1994 to provide seamless wide -area coverage from Aspen to Vail to Parachute, utilizing high repeater sites such as Aspen Mountain and Sunlight Peak. The Roaring Fork Transportation Authority became a joint user of the system in 1997. In recent years Nextel cell sites in urban areas have increasingly become a source of localized interference to public safety and commercial 800 MHz radio systems; the City of Denver and Arizona Public Service to name a couple. Police and utility 800 MHz portable radios will literally go deaf when near a Nextel cell site. Nextel has consistently argued that its operations are technically in compliance with Federal regulations, as would likely be the case at the AABC. However, even the Federal Communications Commission does not have an immediate solution at hand to resolve this ongoing issue, of which Holy Cross has gone on record (attached). In conclusion, Holy Cross Energy has insufficient technical information to specifically oppose Nextel's application; however we do wish to go on record as being concerned about the potential impact to RFTA and Holy Cross' critical communications. Sincerely, HOLY CROSS ENERGY Kevin Milner, Telecom Technical Advisor Phone: (970) 947 -5427 E -mail: kmilner @holycross.com cc: Phil Shultz - RFTA �" � Holy Cross Comments - WT Docket No. 02 -55pdf ® 800 MHz COALITION 5.28.03 final.doc OUOO14 Printed for Ezra Louthis <ezral @co.pitkin.co.us> 2/23/2004 D1 Project Description Project: 0255 Si7,a e ff'a _ .4P,V #264334-116100 e TETRA TECH, INC. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (303) 472 -2148 PHONE Nextel Communications ( Nextel) is formally requesting Special Review Approval pursuant to Code Section 3 -210 of this proposal to incorporate a wireless telecommunications facility to be located at Colorado Mountain College (CMC) located at 0255 Sage Way, in the Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC). Nextel's proposal requests the authorization for the construction, use, and maintenance of an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility, which further enhances Nextel's Colorado wireless network. The development of this portion of the network will allow its customers seamless access to Nextel's nationwide network of services. The proposed facility will be in operation 24 hours per day; 7 days a week and will only require routine maintenance once every 4 to 6 weeks. This proposed facility will consist of three (3) omni or whip type antennas and an equipment shelter designed and I .constructed to match the existing structure. Each antenna has an approximate dimension -af5'- 2`tall x 2" in diameter. These antennas are similar to those previously approved at the Airport Fire Station and the Aspen Animal Hospital. The proposed antennas will be n / spaced along the "spine" of the roof as depicted in the photosimulations and drawings ny p attached. You will also find attached as Exhibit B, an antenna specification sheet. Response To Requested Criteria Section 3 -60, Environment and Aesthetics 3 -60 -020 Air Quality The proposed Nextel Facility is unmanned and will not create any emissions that would be construed as pollution. 3 -60 -030 Preservation of Natural Landscape Not Applicable. The proposed Nextel Site will not utilize off -site fill nor will this project disturb more than fifty (50) cubic yards of soil. 3 -60 -040 Scenic Overlay The Colorado Mountain College falls within the State Highway 82 Scenic Overlay Zone. Nextel would like to request Planning Director Sign -Off pursuant to Section 3- 60- 040(D) Based on the Criteria required for Planning Director Sign -Off (D) 1 -3: 1. The Proposed Development cannot be seen from the Designated Corridor. 2. The Proposals visibility is far less than the 30% threshold and would not have a significant impact to the scenic resources. 3. The Proposed Nextel facility does not encroach on any ridgelines. Uu0015 Zoning Application Narrative December 19, 2003 In 3 -60 -050 Scenic Quality TETRA TECH, INC. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (303) 472 -2148 PHONE A. Visual Damage: Development shall avoid alterations to the natural landscape, which are visible from other properties and public use areas. The proposed Nextel equipment will be located on the west side of the College thus screening the proposed addition from residential views on the east side of the college. The three proposed antennas are 2" thick and will be painted to match the color of the building. B. Landscaping and Lighting: Landscaping and/or outdoor lighting proposals shall comply with the Pitkin County Landscaping Guidelines. Currently there is no additional landscaping proposed for the Nextel addition. The equipment addition to the existing building will extend the design and materials to be consistent with the existing building. Nextel will remove and replace the grass buffer around the building that exists at present Any exterior lighting associated with the Nextel proposal will be motion sensored. C. Utilities: Install utilities in a manner, which minimizes damage to the natural environment. All utilities (Telephone and Power) will reach the proposed Nextel equipment underground and will not damage the natural environment. D. Scenic Views and Vistas: Preserve Scenic Views and Vistas. The proposed Nextel antennas will not affect or degrade any existing scenic view. E. Satellite Dishes: Mitigate the visual impacts of satellite dishes by using earth -tone colors, screening, and siting relative to other land uses. The proposed Nextel facility will not need to utilize any parabolic or satellite dishes at this location. Due to the fact the telephone service is currently at the site, there is no need for a dish. F. Screening Buildings: Utilize natural topography whenever possible to screen buildings to the maximum extent possible. The proposed project area is essentially aside an existing building and adjacent to the parking lot. There is no natural topography to screen the equipment area. Nextel has chosen to minimize the visual impact by designing the building to be consistent with the existing. G. Topography: Design structures to blend with the topography. The existing topography will provide little screening of the proposed site. The antennas and equipment building addition will be designed to match the existing building whether consistent materials are utilized or paint is needed. Zoning Application Narrative Oi100i6 December 19, 2003 `..d1 �. TETRA TECH, INC. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH it ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 fk (303) 472 -2148 PHONE 3 -60 -060 Solar Access No Solar access will be required for the proposed Nextel facility. 3 -60 -070 Reductions in Density for Steep Slopes. Not Applicable. Section3 -210, Special Review. A. The Special Review Use shall consider the applicable County Master Plan. This facility will not compromise the intent of the Aspen Area Community Plan. B. The Special Review Use shall not conflict with any applicable sections of the Pitkin County Land Use Code, including the County Land Use Policies in Article 2. The proposed Nextel Facility is consistent with the applicable Code Policies in Article 2. C. The Special Review Use shall be consistent with the intent of the Zone District in which it is proposed to be located. Wireless phones are becoming an integral part of everyone's lives, whether it is at work, in the car and even at home. By locating at the Colorado Mountain College, a multi -use building, it allows those Nextel subscribers in this area the ability to utilize the services provided. D. The Special Review Use shall be compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or shall enhance the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel for development. As mentioned above, Nextel is proposing to locate a Colorado Mountain College because there is a significant need for additional service in this area. The design of this site is consistent and compatible with the exiting use. E. The location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed special review use must be in harmony with the surrounding area an minimize adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, traffic generation, parking, trash, service delivery, air /water pollution or other impacts on natural resources, noise vibrations and odor on surrounding properties Unlike other land uses, which can be spatially determined through the General Plan or other land use plans, the location of wireless telecommunications facilities are based on technical requirements which include service area, geographical elevations, alignment with neighboring sites and customer demand components. Placement within the urban geography is dependent on these requirements. Accordingly, wireless telecommunication facilities have been located adjacent to and within all major land use categories including residential, commercial, industrial, open space, etc. proving to be compatible in all locations. The proposed facility at the subject location will be unmanned, have no impact on circulation systems, and generate no noise, odor, smoke, or any other adverse impacts to adjacent land uses. The proposed facility will allow commuters and residents within the coverage area wireless access to the rapidly expanding communications infrastructure Zoning Application Narrative December 19, 2003 OU0017 " TETRA TECH, INC. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (303) 472 -2148 PHONE by providing voice and data transmission services. The installation of antenna sectors and transmission equipment will not result in any material changes to the character of the local community. This proposed wireless telecommunications facility will operate in full compliance with all state and federal regulations including the Telecommunications Act of 1996. F. There must be adequate public facilities and services to serve the special review use, including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools. The proposed facility only requires telephone and power. This facility will not negatively impact any of the above uses, in fact it will benefit communications services for emergency medical services, fire, police, and public service. G. An application for a special review use must demonstrate to the Board of County Commissioners that the proposed development will not: 1. Materially endanger the public health, safety or welfare; and The proposed site is a passive use; it will not endanger the health, safety or welfare of the residents, employees or surrounding businesses. 2. Substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property. This proposed installation, will have no impact on the value of adjoining properties. Zoning Application Narrative UU0018 December 19, 2003 1*. n Network Description TETRA TECH, INC. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (303) 472 -2148 PHONE Nextel Communications (Nextel), based in Reston, VA, is a leading provider of fully integrated, wireless communications services on the largest guaranteed, all- digital, wireless network in the country. Nextel and Nextel Partners, Inc., currently serve 198 of the top 200 U.S. markets. Through recent market launches, Nextel and Nextel Partners service is available today in areas of the United States where approximately 240 million people live or work. Nextel has set their goals to become the premier wireless provider to bring a superior, more cost - effective and secure wireless communications network to the Colorado market. Nextel is actively pursuing the deployment of their Colorado network to further establish their foundation as one of the more advanced wireless communications providers in this region, as well as, the nationwide market. Nextel looks forward to working closely with local jurisdictions to develop their community- oriented network and provide them access to a host of network amenities. It is Nextel's goal/intent to provide the best seamless wireless telecommunications network to the resident's, employees, and commuters within Pitkin County and the surrounding communities. The Nextel 4 -in -1 service — Nextel Digital Cellular, Direct ConnectsM, Nextel Mobile Messaging and Nextel Online®— covers thousands of communities across the United States. Nextel uses a packet -based platform, the integrated Digital Enhanced Network (iDENTM) technology, developed by Motorola. This all- digital technology provides exceptional sound and transmission quality, using state -of -the -art methods that deliver these unparalleled Nextel services: • Digital Cellular Customers experience crystal clear calls and guaranteed message delivery in a secure environment, no matter where they travel within the Nextel National Network. Direct Connect M Service Nextel Direct Connect, the only digital long range walkie- talkie feature built into every Nextel phone is the easiest and fastest way to instantly contact co- workers, contractors, family and friends, all at the push of a button and a fraction of the cost of a traditional cell phone call. Nextel's Direct Connect is instant conversation and answers. Direct Connect service works over Nextel's digital network, which creates an incredibly clear, secure link between you and the person you're calling. • Nextel Mobile Messaging The untethered power of the Internet keeps customers connected to clients, co- workers and family with text, numeric and two -way messaging. Zoning Application Narrative GU' 0019 December 19, 2003 MFA fmkw. TETRA TECH, INC. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (303) 472 -2148 PHONE • Nextel Online® Service Ranked #1 in wireless Internet service satisfaction since January 2002, according to In- Stat/MDR Group, Nextel Web -based services provide anywhere access to office or personal email, wireless - enabled Internet sites and company databases. In order to provide these services to their customers, Nextel is constantly refining their local, nationwide, and even global networks /partnerships. Nextel recently launched their Nationwide Direct Connect, which allows consumers to contact anyone on the Nextel National Network- coast -to- coast. International customers travel the globe with Nextel WorldwideTM service. Nextel Internet -ready global phones operate on the MEN network in the United States and seamlessly move to GSM in more than 80 countries. Nextel offers many options to the worldwide traveler. Whether you frequently travel abroad, occasionally leave the country, or just want to use your Nextel phone in seven select countries, Nextel meets your needs. Nextel's phones are small, lightweight and easy -to- use for international use only. Nextel even has a rental solution for single trips. Network Overview: Since their introduction, wireless telecommunications systems have proved to be an invaluable communications tool in the event of emergencies (traffic accidents, fires, etc.) and natural disasters (earthquakes, floods, etc.) where normal land line communications are often disrupted, overlooked, or inaccessible during and after an event has occurred. This service and similar technology are utilized by numerous governmental and quasi - governmental agencies that provide emergency service. Wireless telecommunications systems, including cellular telephones, have also proved to be invaluable tools in business communications and everyday personal use. In this sense, wireless telecommunications system networks have proved to be desirable in the interest of public convenience, health, safety, and welfare. Wireless communication is accomplished by linking a network of radio wave transmitting devices such as portable and car phones, to the conventional telephone system through a series of short-range, contiguous cells. Similar to a honeycomb pattern, a wireless system is composed of many neighboring and interconnecting cells called, "cell sites," covering specific geographical areas. Each cell site contains transmitting/receiving antennas and radio transmitting equipment. As a customer enters one cell and exits another, the call is transferred between the cells by a computer at the main switch station. Calls can originate or be received from a wireless device because antennas share a fixed number of frequencies across the network grid. A caller may initiate a call from within the radius of one cell antenna, as the caller travels through the network, the call is transferred from one cell to the next, thus enabling continuous, uninterrupted transmission. Wireless technology operates on a line of sight, that is antennas must be mounted high enough to overcome challenges posed by local topography, existing vegetation, avoid interference with other wireless infrastructure, and surrounding structures /development. The distance between cell sites will normally range from '/z mile to 9 miles, depending on Zoning Application Narrative December 19, 2003 0u0020 1 .✓ fmmk TETRA TECH, INC. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (303) 472 -2148 PHONE the population density, consumer usage, existing vertical elements, and the geographical terrain. The required height for antennas is usually proportional to a combination of the distance each cell site can service and the customer demand within their sphere of influence. Typical placement for antennas are on utility poles within the public right -of- way, light standards, freestanding towers, guyed towers, and lattice, or self - support towers. Antennas can also be placed on rooftops, integrated into the building's architecture, and other building features if the structure has sufficient height to meet the needs of the service area. Wireless facilities located throughout Nextel's service area are intended to provide seamless call coverage, capacity and quality to its network. The following are some of the basic types of cell sites: Coverage sites serve to expand coverage in large areas or in areas with difficult terrain and to enhance coverage for portable systems. Coverage sites allow users to make and maintain calls as they travel between cells. Capacity sites serve to increase the capacity when surrounding sites have reached their practical channel limits. As the years pass, the number of subscribers increases exponentially creating a strain on the existing network. In order to alleviate this strain, capacity sites are implemented into the systems network to accommodate the increase in customer demand. Site Selection• Unlike other land uses, which can be spatially determined through the General Plan or other land use plans, placement and implementation of wireless telecommunications facilities are based on technical requirements, which include service area, geographical elevations, alignment with neighboring sites and customer demand. Site selection within the rural or urban environment is dependent upon these requirements, as well as, the availability of property within the geographical area, and willing property owners who will allow the incorporation of an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility on their property. During the site selection process, technical requirements may hinder the ability of commercial wireless providers to co- habitate on a common rooftop or even co- locate on a freestanding antennas support structure. System performance and potential signal interference due to the close proximity of the other provider's antennas or signal bandwidth are just a few of the issues that need to be addressed prior to negotiating or designing a wireless facility for co- location or co- habitation. (Note: Wireless systems that have frequency bandwidths within close proximity to one another could have potential interference issues, which can be controlled /isolated with the cooperation from both providers' /entities' radio frequency engineers) Further, the distance the signal can propagate due to the limited height available on a co- location structure or even the line of sight availability on a co- habitation site are issues that validate the subject locations feasibility with regards to its incorporation into the local and national network. From a business standpoint, there are issues with regards to the feasible terms and conditions negotiated with the property owner. Termination clauses, and business deal points agreed upon with one carrier and the subject property owner might not necessarily work or meet the objectives or budgets of another. This is strictly a business issue and is proprietary in Zoning Application Narrative December 19, 2003 OU0021 0 4.� TETRA TECH, INC. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (303) 472 -2148 PHONE nature and is a concern between all providers. Further, the available roof or ground space required for the electronic equipment cabinets and/or shelter, as well as, issues addressing the structural integrity of the subject roof, may render the subject location not feasible from a construction standpoint. Wireless providers are amenable locating their equipment on the same property and/or building/structure, however, the issues stated are some of the factors in their decision making process as to why a potential co- location or co- habitation site was or was not selected. Wireless telecommunication facilities are built adjacent to and within all major land use categories including residential, commercial, industrial, open space, etc. proving to be compatible in a variety of situations. Wireless facilities are unmanned, have no impact on existing circulation systems, generate no noise, odor, smoke, or any other adverse impacts to adjacent land uses. Wireless facilities will allow commuters and residents within the coverage area wireless access to the rapidly expanding communications infrastructure by providing voice and data transmission services not currently available by other systems. Wireless telecommunications facilities operate in full compliance with all state and federal regulations as provided by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Federal Regulations: Nextel Communications is a registered public utility, licensed and regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Nextel will comply with all FCC /CPUC rules governing construction requirements, technical standards, interference protection, power and height limitations, and radio frequency standards. In addition, the company will comply with all Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rules on site locations and operation. Benefits to the Community: Wireless technology will provide many benefits to the residents, businesses, and motorists that travel or live near the proposed project site. These benefits include: • Quick access to 911 Emergency, even in remote regions, allowing motorists to summon emergency aid and report dangerous situations. • Support for emergency services by providing wireless communications access to paramedics, firefighters, and law enforcement agencies that use this technology. • A backup system to the landline telephone services in the event of power outages, natural or man-made disasters. • The ability to transmit data over the airwaves allowing for immediate access to vital information to emergency services. • Provide quality wireless communications including voice, paging, digital data capabilities for email, facsimile and Internet access. Enhance the communications systems of residents and business around the project coverage area. Zoning Application Narrative ouGG22 December 19, 2003 N -W 0 TETRA TECH, INC. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (303) 472 -2148 PHONE This site, as designed, will provide much needed coverage in this area. We have addressed the Criteria and believe that this proposal is in accordance with the development standards for facilities of this type. If there are any additional questions or concerns that arise, please feel free to call me at any time to discuss the project in more detail. Thank you for your acceptance and review of this application and I look forward to presenting to yo e near future. Justin R binson Tetra Te / Whaler Leasing and.Zoning 333lnvernes ve Englewood, CO 80112 (303) 472 -2148 ph. (303) 721 -3944 fax u u O -023 Zoning Application Narrative December 19, 2003 �0 Project Legal Description A-I#e TETRA TECH, INC. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (303) 472 -2148 PHONE LOT 1, BLOCK 1, THE PLAT OF THE NORTH FORTY PUD SUBDIVISION PITKIN COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO. 000024 0 000025 M �U) U � ww �w _? U Y QU w d I loss 1 1 1 0 0 � M � O O O � N M � ^' O � N O r w Q Gzl M 00 N W PITKIN COUNTY PRE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUNIVIARY DATE: February 13, 2003 PROJECT: Nextel Special Review for a Telecommunications Facility LOCATION: Colorado Mountain College REPRESENTATIVE: Justin Robinson Tel: (303) 346 -4832 PLANNER: Brian McNellis Tel: (970) 920 -5092 1. Type of Application: Special Review for a Telecommunications Facility. Description of Project/Development: Applicant is requesting approval to mount 3 cell phone antennas on the Colorado Mountain College building near the North 40 Subdivision. 3. Areas in which the Applicant is requested to respond, types of reports: Land Use Code Sections: • Section 3 -60, Environment and Aesthetics • Section 3 -210 Special Review Note: Any development above the allowed Pitkin County height limitations will require a variance from the Board of Adjustment. 4. Review is before: BOCC 5. Public Hearing: Yes, at BOCC. The applicant shall post a public notice sign on the property at least 15 days prior to the hearing and shall mail notice to all adjacent property owners at least 30 prior to the hearing with the return address of the Community Development Department (copy of the notice to be obtained from the Community Development Department). The names and addresses shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appear nor more than 60 days prior to the date of the public hearing. 6. Will be referred to Communications Engineer, Zoning, Airport, North 40 Homeowners. 7. What fees was the applicant requested to submit: $1,441 (make check payable to Pitkin County Treasurer) • Planning Office flat fee: Special Review - minor $1,000 (non - refundable; based on 4.75 hours of staff time; if staff review time exceeds 5.7 hours, the Applicant will be charged for additional time at a rate of $210/hour) • Clerk: $310 • Airport: $106 • Public Notice fee: $25 8. To apply, submit eight (8) copies of the following information, unless otherwise noted: • Letter of request (application), addressing Code Sections listed above; • Copies of previous land use approvals for the subject property; • Site Plan that shows the location of proposed development; • ems_ (from a title company or attorney licensed in the State of Colorado) including legal description• • Elevation plans of facility and/or structures; • Letter from owner authorizing the representative (1 copy); • Agreement for payment form (2 copies); • A list of adjacent property owners (1 copy); • Total deposit for review of the application; • Copy of this pre- application form (1 copy); PLEASE NOTE: This pre - application conference summary is advisory in nature and not binding on the County. The information provided in this summary is based on current zoning standards and staff's interpretations based upon representations of the applicant. Additional information may be 000026 required upon complete review of the application. DEC -17 -2003 WED 12:51 PM --DEC. 17. 2003­11 ; 43AM COLORADO MTN COLLEGE "1 _1 FAX NO. 9709478324 Letter of Authorization APPLICATION FOR ZONING /USE PERMIT N0. 3579 P, 2 Noftl Site #: CO -583 Aspen A4port - CMC 1, Sam Skramstad, authorind representative of Colorado Mous"k College, at the below - described address, do hereby authorize TetmaTech Wireless, authorized agent for NFXTEL WEST CORP,, a Delaware corporation, d/b /a Nextel Communications, pcnnissicm, for the Purpose of consummating any building or use permit applications necessary to emm Nead's ability to use the property for the Purpose of coviarucang and operating a coaununirahons facility. I understand that this application may be denied, modiflod or approved with conditions and that such conditions and that such oonditions or modifications must be complied with prior to issuance of building permits. Property address; 0255 Sage Way Aspw4 CO 51611 Assessor's Parcel Number: 2643344 Siparure of Authori7ed Representative: Titlo: 10 z--11,7-- Lo, P, 02 264334416100 TetraTech Wireless Colorado Mountain Jr. College Justin Robinson P.O. Box 10001 333 Inverness Drive South Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Englewood, CO 80112 264334416200 Sage LLC 303E AABC Aspen, CO 81611 264334416019 Klein, Kara Elisabeth 18 Totterdown Road Aspen, CO 81611 -1006 264334400853 Pitkin County 530 E. Main, Ste. 302 Aspen, CO 81611 OuGO28 264334416013 Soyka Frederick, K 326 Teal Ct. Aspen, CO 81611 264334416020 Seedorf, Natasha C 0032 Totterdown Road Aspen, CO 81611 264334407023 Smith, Christopher H. 234 W. Hopkins Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 264334416018 Swales, Donald and Suzanne P.O. Box 1596 Aspen, CO 81612 264334416021 Bruice, Kenton Talbot 1280 Ute Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: Nextel Special Review for a Telecommunication Facility (Case P146 -03) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, February 25, 2004 at a regular meeting to begin at 2:00 PM or as soon thereafter as the conduct of business allows, before the Board of County Commissioners, Plaza One Conference Room, 530 E. Main St., Aspen to consider an application submitted by Nextel West Corp. for approval to mount three cell phone antennas on the Colorado Mountain College building. The property is located at 0255 Sage Way, Lot 1, Block 1, of the North Forty PUD Subdivision, Pitkin County, Colorado. The application/resolution are available for public inspection in the Community Development Department, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO 81611. For further information, contact Ezra Louthis at (970) 920 -5092. Jeanette Jones, Deputy County Clerk Board of County Commissioners Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on January 24, 2004 Pitkin County 002.02. Public Private W0029 PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920 -5526 FAX # (970) 920 -5439 January 13, 2004 Mr. Justin Robinson TetraTech Communications 333 Inverness Drive South Englewood, CO 80112 Re: Nextel Special Review for a Telecommunication Facility (PID# 2643- 344 -16 -100 Case# P146 -03) Dear Mr. Robinson: The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. After a more detailed review of the submittal information, additional information specific to the application may be requested in order to adequately review and process the application. The planner in charge of the review will request the information from you directly. We have scheduled this application for review at a public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, February 25, 2004 at a meeting to begin at 2:00 P.M. in the Plaza One Meeting Room at 530 East Main St., Aspen. Should this date be inconvenient for you, please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning Office. Please note that it is your responsibility to post a public notice sign on the property at least fifteen days prior to the hearing (and remove it within one week after) and to mail notice to all adjacent property owners and mineral estate owners at least 30 days prior to the hearing with the return address of the Community Development Department (copy of notice to be obtained from the Community Development Department). The names and addresses shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than 60 days prior to the date of the public hearing. Please submit the enclosed Affidavit of Notice by Posting & Mailing as proof of compliance with the Code at the hearing. If you have any questions, please call Ezra Louthis, the planner assigned to your case, at 920 -5092. Sincerely, Janis B. Taylor Administrative Assistant Encl: Affidavit of Notice 30030 PTTKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone (970) 920 -5090 FAX (970) 920 -5439 MEMORANDUM TO: Communications Engineer Zoning Aspen Airport North Forty HOA FROM: Ezra Louthis, Community Development Department RE: Nextel Special Review for a Telecommunication Facility (PID# 2643- 344 -16 -100 Case# P146 -03) DATE: January 13, 2004 Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application submitted by Nextel West Corporation. The Board of County Commissioners will review the application on Wednesday, February 25, 2004. Please return your comments to me by Friday, February 6, 2004. PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION MATERIALS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IF YOU HAVE NO FURTHER NEED OF THEM. Thank you. iu0631 .,rr■ww"� i t co&� 16345 NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMQ ` 130 South Galena Street i Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920 -5526 Pitkin County Land Use: 172 Board of Adjustment 159 County Land Use Code r 173 Deposit 174 Flat Fee 1000-001 162 Zoning and Sign 169 Public Notice 160 Planning Enforcement Referral Fees: RB115 Access Permit 210 Airport j LUC01 County Clerk 211 County Engineer 194 Environmental Health 208 Historic 198 Housing 190 Land Management 209 Redstone HPC 206 Wildlife Officer Building Fees: 170 Board of Appeals i 135 Building Code Sales 105 Building Permit 100 Contractor License 120 Electrical Permit 195 Energy Code Review 115 Mechanical Permit 150 Plan Check 110 Plumbing Permit 130 Reinspection 151 Aspen Sanitation 152 AVFD Fire Marshal i Other Fees: 155 Use Tax 165 Copy Performance Deposit 185 Park Dedication J 186 Parking Cash in Lieu j i IS GIS Requirements B1202 Road Impact Fee B1203 School Impact Fee 0000 4TA>E> C j NAME: ADDRESS /PROJECT: i PHONE: CHECK# CASE /PERMIT #: # OF COPIES: DATE: i INITIAL: ItI c == communications Tetra Tech Communication Services PROJECT TEAM SITE OWNER COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE 255 SAGE WAY ASPEN, CO. 81611 CONTACT: ANN HARRIS /SAM SKRAMSTAD PHONE: 970 - 925 -7740 APPLICANT AGENT TETRATECH 333 SOUTH INVERNESS DRIVE ENGLEWOOD, CO. 80112 CONTACT: JUSTIN ROBINSON PHONE: (303) 472 -2148 APPLICANT NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 333 SOUTH INVERNESS DRIVE ENGLEWOOD, CO. 80112 PHONE: (303)472 -2114 JERRY CUNNINGHAM CONSTRUCTION MANAGER TETRATECH 333 SOUTH INVERNESS DRIVE ENGLEWOOD, CO. 80112 PHONE: (303) 434 -2708 CONTACT: GARY WEISBROD PROJECT SUMMARY SITE ADDRESS 255 SAGE WAY ASPEN. CO. 81611 CODE BLOCK SITE LOCATION: 255 SAGE WAY ASPEN. CO. 81611 JURISDICTION: PITKIN COUNTY BUILDING CODE: 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1996 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT OCCUPANCY: U1 /U2 (UNMANNED TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNA) ZONING DATA: PUD WATER SUPPLY: NONE /WASTE WATER: NONE /PLUMBING: NONE ELECTRICAL SERVICE PROVIDER: SAN ISABEL POWER TELEPHONE SERVICE PROVIDER: QWEST THE PROPOSED PROJECT INCLUDES MOUNT ANTENNAS ON EXISTING BUILDING DESIGNED EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE NEW TELEPHONE SERVICE APPROVALS TITLE SHEET Z -1 RF ENGINEER DATE RF MANAGER DATE SITE ACID DATE SITE MANAGER DATE CONSTRUCTION P.M. DATE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OPERATIONS MANAGER DATE FACILITIES MANAGER DATE PROPERTY OWNER DATE DRAWING INDEX TITLE SHEET Z -1 TITLE SHEET Z -2 SITE PLAN Z -3 NEW CONSTRUCTION ROOF PLAN EQUIPMENT SHELTER PLAN & ANTENNA /ROOF PLAN Z -4 CONSTRUCTION PLAN, FINISH PLAN & RELECTED CEILING PLAN Z -5 ELEVATIONS SYMBOLS - - - - -- PROPERTY LINE x— x —X —X —X FENCING A -2 ELEVATION REFERENCE SYMBOL A?z PLAN REFERENCE SYMBOL ASPEN AIRPORT C0583E 255 SAGE WAY ASPEN. CO. 81611 ZONING DRAWINGS DIRECTIONS TO SITE 1. Start at 333 INVERNESS DR, ENGLEWOOD on INVERNESS OR S going towards INVERNESS DR S — go O.B mi 2. Continue on E COUNTY LINE RD — go 2G mi 3. Turn on S QUEBEC ST — go 0.1 mi 4. Bear to take CO -470 WEST — go 24.1 m 5. Take the I -70 WEST exit towards GRAND JUNCTION — qo 144.4 m 6. Take the GLENWOOD SPGS(CO -82 E) exit towards ASPEN, exit #116 —go 0.2 m1 12. FOLLOW SIGNS TO ASPEN HWY 82. 13. TURN LEFT AT ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER (ACROSS FROM AIRPORT) 14, TAKE THE FIRST LEFT AND PROCEED TO THE SITE. VICINITY MAP NO SCALE I it AWMEA-17, KDC Architects — Engineers, P.C. 7442 S. Tascon Way, Suite 160 Englewood, Colorado 80112 303.750.6999 FAX 303.750.0236 Email: kdcden_rQkdcorchitects.com Website: www.kdcarchitects.com TETRA TECH 138020.020 SWJ PFM 1 12.03.03 ZONING REVIEW I All drawinega n r {�d ria a atonal aUa hi 'mtloled r9lhout the en co Lnieol In. EO h' ecl! C0583E ASPEN AIRPORT 255 SAGE WAY ASPEN, CO. 81611 EXISTING BUILDING & EQUIPMENT SHELTER TITLE SHEET Z -1 I IN r.�•�sl�nri•�• /—,,,,SITE PLAN v Z -2 SCALE FOR 2406: 1' - 20' -0' 0 20' 60' FOR 1107: 1' - 40' -0' NORTH SCALE FEET / / v 0-11 'Q I � I I I 1� I S I r 1� i I I I I I I I I I KEYM NOTES — O1 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ROUTE OPROPOSED ACCESS ROUTE O EXISTING CURB TO BE RELOCATED <3> EXISTING KILN BUILDING OEXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING OEXISTING CMU WALL TO REMAIN O EXISTING TEL PEDESTAL OEXISTING WALKWAY OEXISTING PARKING LOT <9> EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN <a> EXISTING HANDICAP PARKING STALL TO BE RELOCATED 1 SPACE TO THE SOUTH II �I 10 3 I r2--�— DEMOLITION PLAN IS Z -2 SCALE FOR 24236: 1/4' � 1' -0" SCALE FOR 11.7: 1/8' - 1' -0' NOM mm KDC Architects - Engineers, P.C. 7442 S. Tuscan Way, Suite 180 Englewood, Colorado 80112 303.750.6999 FAX 303.750.0236 Email: kdcdenverOkdcarchit'=cam Wedsite: www.kdcorchitects.com TETRA TECH It e 138020.020 SWJ PFM 1 12.03.03 ZONING REVIEW iOAll rawln d 4r. 1 npained IIL tiwd".tin rye C05B3E ASPEN AIRPORT 255 SAGE WAY ASPEN, CO. 81611 EXISTING BUILDING & EQUIPMENT SHELTER SITE PLAN & DEMOLITION PLAN Z -2 f 00&35 41 2 3 Z -3 Z -3 nANTENNAS /ROOF PLAN Z -3 STALE FOR 24x38: 1 /B" = V-0 IS PALE FOR 11.17: 1" - 40' -0" NORTH \ I�10 B II \ I 1--05 I SEE 1/A -1 FOR CONTINUATION NEW CONSTRUCTION ROOF PLAN z3 SCALE FOR 24.3fi: 1/4' = V-01 �H SCALE FOR 11.17: 1/8" = 1' -0" nEQUIPMENT SHELTER PLAN L -3 SCALE FOR 24x36: 1/4" = 1' —p' SCALE FOR 11.17: 1 /0' 1' -0' NORTH KEYED NOTES 0 PROPOSED 20' -0' . 22' -0" LEASE AREA OPROPOSED ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING KILN BUILDING ROOF OPROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB OPROPOSED GPS ANTENNAS 05 PROPOSED U.G TEL ROUTE OPROPOSED U.G. COAX ROUTE FROM SHELTER TO BUILDING WALL OPROPOSED CONCRETE STOOP OPROPOSED B" CMU WALL TO MATCH EXISTING KILN BUILDING OPROPOSED COAX CABLE ROUTE ON EXISTING METAL FACIA W/ SHROUD AND PAINT TO MATCH 10 PROPOSED 3 WHIP NEXTEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING 11 PROPOSED VERTICAL COAX ROUTE MOUNTED TO EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING. PAINT TO MATCH <9> PROPOSED DOOR <9> PROPOSED 2 Y1" METAL STUD FLOOR TO CEILING W/ %- TYPE "X" 14 NEW LOCATION OF EXISTING CURB AFTER IS RELOCATED <9> EXISTING AWNING <9> EXISTING KILN BUILDING ROOF 17 EXISTING BUILDING <9> EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING ROOF <3> EXISTING CMU WALL TO REMAIN <8> EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN it AIA oU �AM-1 KDC Architects — Engineers, P.C. 7442 S. Tuscan Way, Suite 180 Englewood, Colorado 80112 303.750.6999 FAX 303.750.0236 Email: kdedenverOkdearehReets.eoi Website: www.kdcarchitects.com PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NO DATE ISSUE 1 12,1313 ZONING IE-VIE-W C0583E ASPEN AIRPORT 255 SAGE WAY ASPEN, CO. 81611 EXISTING BUILDING & EQUIPMENT SHELTER ANTENNAS /ROOF PLAN EQUIPMENT SHELTER PLAN NEW CONSTRUCTION PLAN Z -3 0 WALL PROPOSED CMU WALL -/7777r7/- PROPOSED 2 1/2" METAL STUDS FLOOR TO CEILING W/5/8" TYPE X GYP, BOARD FINISHED. EXISTING CMU WALL —_� - -i --- I_T_r_ —_- I I I I nCONSTRUCTION PLAN tl'1 _ Z -4 SCALE FOR 24x36: 1/4' = 1' -0" NORTH U636 16 3 6 SCALE FOR 11x17: 1/8' = 40'- REFLECTED OPROPOSED 4' -0' LONG TWO LAMP OPEN STRIP FLUORESCENT FIXTURE WITH ELECTRONIC BALLAST AND WIRE GUARD. 120V. PROVIDE TS LAMPS WITH CRI 075 AND COLOR TEMP OF 3000 "K AS MFG. BY SYLVANIA F032/730. O 0 SMOKE DEFECTOR 12 < COORDINATE LOCATION OF THE FOLLOWING W/ FINAL EQUIPMENT FLOOR PLANS. - LIGHT FIXTURES - DUPLEX OUTLETS - THERMOSTAT O TWO LAYERS OF 1/2" GYP BOARD ON HAT CHANNEL SUSPENDED FROM ABOVE. REFLECTED CEILING LEGEND 1' X 4' LIGHT FIXTURE O SMOKE DETECTOR REFLECTED CEILING GENERAL NOTES 1. THIS DRAWING IS FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES ONLY, REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION. 2. FIXTURE AND EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS ARE AS MEASURED FROM EXISTING WALL 1 3 4 !9 ' sS E% I/ i � € i © a =-�� REFLECTED CEILING PLAN C2-I 2 -4 SCALE FOR 24x36: 1/4' � 1' -0' NORTH SCALE FOR 11.17: 1/8' - 40'- 11 FINISH SCHEDULE KEYED NOTES -lI O PROPOSED WALLS : (1) PRIME; (2) COATS OF PAINT. COLOR BY NEXTEL O RUBBER BASE BOARD (TYP.) O3 VCT FLOORING: MODEL BY NEXTEL 11 EQUIPMENT LIST iO 200 AMP TRANSFER SWITCH. O4' -0'x 4' -0 'x1/2' FRP LAMINATED PLYWOOD TELCO BOARD 3 40 SPACE, 20GAMP, 240/120 VAC, 1 PHASE, 3 WIRE DISTRIBUTION PANEL WITH MAN BREAKER, SQUARE D 00 SERIES ¢O 4' -0" 2 —TUBE FLOURESCENT FIXTURE RANGEARE NC, RWA1411CS OALARM TERMINAL PANEL WITH 12 —SPACE SCREW TYPE TERMINAL 12 E-4 O4 "x12 "x'1/4" COPPER TELCO BOARD GROUND BUS WITH INSULATORS. SEE OETALS 7O 200 AMP MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH gO 10 LB. CO2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER 10 GRANGER NO, 114734 BATTERY SAFETY KR 11 GRANGER NO. 5X806 FIRST AID KIT 12 SMOKE DETECTOR WITH JUNCTION BOX DICON 120 VOLT 13 24" CABLE TRAY. 14 CABLE TRAY HANGER KR WITH CEILING SUPPORT BRACKET AND 3/8' THREADED RODS 15 CABLE TRAY WALL SUPPORT KIT 18 CABLE TRAY JUNCTION KIT 17 CABLE TRAY SPLICE KIT FINISH PLAN Z -4 SCALE FOR 24x36: 1/C = 1' -0' SCALE FOR 11.17: 1/8' = 40'-q* NORTH it; NAwwAr .b, KDC Architects - Engineers, P.C. 7442 S. Tuscan Way, Suite 180 Englewood, Colorado 80112 303.750.6999 FAX 303.750.0236 Email: kdcdenverOkdcarchitects.com We6site: www.kdcorchitects.com PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NO DATE ISSUE 1 12,03,03 ZONING I-EW C0583E ASPEN AIRPORT 255 SAGE WAY ASPEN, CO. 81611 EXISTING BUILDING & EQUIPMENT SHELTER 'ONSTRUCTION PLAN REFLECTED CEILING PLAN -INISH PLAN ,11014:11111 , Z -4 CONSTRUCTION PLAN KEYED NOTES O7 RADIO EQUIPMENT PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS (SHOWN FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES) O24' WIDE CABLE TRAY (7' -6' A.F.F.) SUSPENDED FROM STRUCTURE. 12 13 14 15 16 17 OPROPOSED ENTRY DOOR. O TELEPHONE BACKBOARD 4' x 8' x 3/4" TYPE "CD` FIRE RETARDENT TREATED O PLYWOOD. MOUNT VERTICALLY WITH BOTTOM 4" ABOVE RUBBER BASE. COVER O200 AMP PANEL. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. r 3 11 OPROPOSED TRANSFER SWITCH. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. O O10 LB. FIRE EXTINGUISHER. OB Og NEW GROUND BAR AT TELCO BOARD. O OALARM TERMINAL PANEL WITH 12 -SPACE SCREW TYPE TERMINAL STRIP, SEE O 10 E� DETAILS FIRST AID KR 10 <a> BATTERY FIRST ND KIT. 11 <g> PROPOSED A/C WALL HUNG UNITS OYP. OF TWO). CONSTRUCTION PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. THE FACILITY IS AN UNOCCUPIED TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT FACILITY. 2. THE NET AREA OF THE EQUIPMENT ROOM IS APPROX. 276 SQUARE FEET. 3, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK. USING BEST SKILLS AND ATTENTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLEY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEOUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. 4. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2 -A OR 2 -A16BC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SITE AND NOTIFY THE PROJECT MANAGER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE STARTING ANY WORK. 6. KEEP GENERAL AREA CLEAN, HAZARD FREE, AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, RUBISH AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON PROPERTY. LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. WALL PROPOSED CMU WALL -/7777r7/- PROPOSED 2 1/2" METAL STUDS FLOOR TO CEILING W/5/8" TYPE X GYP, BOARD FINISHED. EXISTING CMU WALL —_� - -i --- I_T_r_ —_- I I I I nCONSTRUCTION PLAN tl'1 _ Z -4 SCALE FOR 24x36: 1/4' = 1' -0" NORTH U636 16 3 6 SCALE FOR 11x17: 1/8' = 40'- REFLECTED OPROPOSED 4' -0' LONG TWO LAMP OPEN STRIP FLUORESCENT FIXTURE WITH ELECTRONIC BALLAST AND WIRE GUARD. 120V. PROVIDE TS LAMPS WITH CRI 075 AND COLOR TEMP OF 3000 "K AS MFG. BY SYLVANIA F032/730. O 0 SMOKE DEFECTOR 12 < COORDINATE LOCATION OF THE FOLLOWING W/ FINAL EQUIPMENT FLOOR PLANS. - LIGHT FIXTURES - DUPLEX OUTLETS - THERMOSTAT O TWO LAYERS OF 1/2" GYP BOARD ON HAT CHANNEL SUSPENDED FROM ABOVE. REFLECTED CEILING LEGEND 1' X 4' LIGHT FIXTURE O SMOKE DETECTOR REFLECTED CEILING GENERAL NOTES 1. THIS DRAWING IS FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES ONLY, REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION. 2. FIXTURE AND EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS ARE AS MEASURED FROM EXISTING WALL 1 3 4 !9 ' sS E% I/ i � € i © a =-�� REFLECTED CEILING PLAN C2-I 2 -4 SCALE FOR 24x36: 1/4' � 1' -0' NORTH SCALE FOR 11.17: 1/8' - 40'- 11 FINISH SCHEDULE KEYED NOTES -lI O PROPOSED WALLS : (1) PRIME; (2) COATS OF PAINT. COLOR BY NEXTEL O RUBBER BASE BOARD (TYP.) O3 VCT FLOORING: MODEL BY NEXTEL 11 EQUIPMENT LIST iO 200 AMP TRANSFER SWITCH. O4' -0'x 4' -0 'x1/2' FRP LAMINATED PLYWOOD TELCO BOARD 3 40 SPACE, 20GAMP, 240/120 VAC, 1 PHASE, 3 WIRE DISTRIBUTION PANEL WITH MAN BREAKER, SQUARE D 00 SERIES ¢O 4' -0" 2 —TUBE FLOURESCENT FIXTURE RANGEARE NC, RWA1411CS OALARM TERMINAL PANEL WITH 12 —SPACE SCREW TYPE TERMINAL 12 E-4 O4 "x12 "x'1/4" COPPER TELCO BOARD GROUND BUS WITH INSULATORS. SEE OETALS 7O 200 AMP MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH gO 10 LB. CO2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER 10 GRANGER NO, 114734 BATTERY SAFETY KR 11 GRANGER NO. 5X806 FIRST AID KIT 12 SMOKE DETECTOR WITH JUNCTION BOX DICON 120 VOLT 13 24" CABLE TRAY. 14 CABLE TRAY HANGER KR WITH CEILING SUPPORT BRACKET AND 3/8' THREADED RODS 15 CABLE TRAY WALL SUPPORT KIT 18 CABLE TRAY JUNCTION KIT 17 CABLE TRAY SPLICE KIT FINISH PLAN Z -4 SCALE FOR 24x36: 1/C = 1' -0' SCALE FOR 11.17: 1/8' = 40'-q* NORTH it; NAwwAr .b, KDC Architects - Engineers, P.C. 7442 S. Tuscan Way, Suite 180 Englewood, Colorado 80112 303.750.6999 FAX 303.750.0236 Email: kdcdenverOkdcarchitects.com We6site: www.kdcorchitects.com PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NO DATE ISSUE 1 12,03,03 ZONING I-EW C0583E ASPEN AIRPORT 255 SAGE WAY ASPEN, CO. 81611 EXISTING BUILDING & EQUIPMENT SHELTER 'ONSTRUCTION PLAN REFLECTED CEILING PLAN -INISH PLAN ,11014:11111 , Z -4 T.O.ND _ ANTENNA ELEV: 138 =0' T.O. ROOF ELEV: 1 st. FLR. ELEV: 0' -0' T.O. GPS ANTENNA Y ELEV: (39'-10 1/2' L.1 ROOF E: 330' -8 1/2' h T.O. RIDGE Y' ELEV: 314' -5' T& WALL ELEV: It _.' � 1st. FLR. �u�G3.7 O � ��,�� ■TWIN I == ' ■II�1 � ill ■ice � �� � ���■�■� ■��I I� ■ °= -- ® ■i!� ■ �j j ■I III_ Il i �■ ■►�;I '�I«1 'll .r .r IL m 7sk,4 1- 1 _ - — — � )SOUTH ELEVATION I I I II I! I I I I I I II 111 1 I I I I I II I 1 I — E BUILDING (N) BUILDING n WEST ELEVATION z -s _ II KEYED NOTES ^O PROPOSED ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING KILN BUILDING ROOF PROPOSED CPS ANTENNAS 3 PROPOSED U.G TEL ROUTE O PROPOSED U.G. COAX ROUTE O PROPOSED CONCRETE STOOP OPROPOSED 8' CMU WALL TO MATCH EXISTING KILN BUILDING OPROPOSED COAX CABLE ROUTE ON EXISTING METAL FACIA W/ SHROUD AND PAINT TO MATCH OB PROPOSED 3 WHIP NEXTEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING O9 PROPOSED VERTICAL COAX ROUTE MOUNTED TO EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING. PAINT TO MATCH <a> EXISTING AWNING <a> EXISTING BUILDING <12 > EXISTING CMU WALL TO REMAIN <9> EXISTING CURB NOTE: ALL LENGTHS AND HEIGHTS ARE APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE COORDINATED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AZIMUTH R -1 B -1 G -1 G R -2 B -Z G -2 120 ' LG-3 GPS1 GPI ANTENNA D9806 DOWN TILT VERIFY WITH NEXTEL RAD CENTER HEIGHT 335' -0' 135' -0' 335' -0' 16'-0' 1 16' -0' MOUNTING TYPE ANTENNA GATE H —FRAME COAX LENGTH 350' -0' 380' -0' 3120' -0' 20' -0' 1 20' -0' COAX SIZE 7/8' 1 7/8' 1 7/8' 1/2' 1/2' COAX TYPE COMSCOPE COMSCOPE COLOR KEY R — RED W — WHITE B — BLUE G — GREEN Y — YELLOW (GPS) n ANTENNA /COAX SCHEDULE Z -5 SCALE: NTS it H = �` KDC Archltects — Engineers, P.C. 7442 S. Tuscan Way, Suite 180 Englewood, Colorado 80112 303.750.6999 FAX 303.750.0236 Email: kdcden rOkdcorchitects.com Website: www.kdcomhitects.com TETRA TECH 138020.020 SWJ PFM 1 12.03.03 ZONING REVIEW ONI Qr a tl dne t nal tale � c9�;°tm�Y :��°� �oai°o�BT r��oRh��•° C0583E ASPEN AIRPORT 255 SAGE WAY ASPEN, CO. 81611 EXISTING BUILDING & EQUIPMENT SHELTER LEVATIONS NNTENNA /COAX SCHEDULE Z -5