HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.min.reg.06281995 '3"a:-'�`.. ._ _ � , , - ..
' , �'r';`�'��;�`��.
..k,.,E:�,�.
A�,.
w.
t:
.; . . .`�.. ..
PTPI�N GOLJNTY C,OMbIISSIONERS ,,:�:- '�j'
i REGUTAR MEETING AGENDA '=�� ==:�.
i ��'#�= :
- � - . . � t'r���.�..',l�.
� � .
. . � - � ?1 ..y�'�
WEDNFSDAY.JUNE 28. 1995 . � .j,_ "
2:3U SPECIAL MEETIIVG-EXECUTIVE SESSION-MOVED AFTER y, � - ;!�
' ADMINISTRATNE PUBLIC HEARING � _ �
" — � Hunter Creek Negotiations,Debbie Quinn �,��.Y. "
W�7kinson Informa(Settlement Conference,Debbie Quinn r .
ADJOURN SPEClAI.MEETING �� `°`"��
� 3:30 PM I.oCition: Plara One Con£erence Room �
� ��ti � ,
,y�
• � * Additions to Administrative Agenda �'�9
,
�� .�.
. (70NSENT AGENDA '..:ja:
;:r•
. . . . . f-•��.�+`
Minutes from June 16, 1995 Regular Meeting
Assignment of Airport Gift Shop License and Use Agreement, Scott Smith � :'�f
_ Green Pricing Resolution,Randy Udal1
ADMINISTRATNE ACITONS �
1. Proposed Formation of Recreation District, Suzanne Wo1ff
* Elam Hot Plant Operating Variance,Brian Pettet ���`'
'��
* Futvre Agendas-Scheduling Issues,Tom Oken
ADMIIdISTRATIVE PUBLIC NEARINGS
�#•
BREAK
�. �� 5:00 PM Lacation: Distrid Courlroom � .
_""___ -�
PUBLIC CJOMb1ENT ;�
CONII�IISSIONER CObIl4LENTS �
- ADDTITONS/DFLEI IONS TO AGENDA
.
LAND USE PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Mackey Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review, Etlen Sassano �
2. Conners Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review,Suzanne Wolff '�.,
3. Levinson 1041 Extension of Vested Rights, Francis Krizmanich + _�..
4. Elk Mountain I.odge Special Review, Rick Magill ��, ?�{�'i
.r� _ ,. �- _
: �., ,
� � +,':.
,
_;�:.�;
n,,.,��� Y �.k �`�„'J'i.���-rY�:.� F y �«Y a r. s�T� �t R ��f� ...��� � ,��S "'',�.€�� i
�ca�'Sa�sx:!.x �:'?::�'�" ra.,i?��'�� i��?:�"Y��t�'`������'�F��� �S }
� . '_ ��. ^"'
' . � +`.
-.. _
� . � - r as -�
,', . � \
. �•. � - . . . . . . � .t.i
. . . _ . . � +:�.
��` � . .. ' . . . . � '
1
� � � . � . i . . . . ,
.. , .,'-.: '.:�.;.,. � . :. ,. . .- : . . . - . .�� . j. !.
� . . , . � . . . j
� . . . . . . . - . � 1�..
_ . .�_ .. . .. ..(� . . . . . . � . • ... ./ ,
. �,.>� � � �... ,
. . , . .:. .. . . �. -.
. .. . �. . .. . . .. .•
�: ,.. . .� � .� �... .. � .. - ... . . 4 .. ' . .�,
`�_ff�� _ _
. , _�`
,-•�- . .
;y,,,�
.
f, . . � - . . / � �,..' .��.. �� +.N',ptl�nYT����iwM�A�
, �� ._... �-_._ . . . _ � _ ... r. . dJ.:t3C.r.MA.r,+rh_;ii.�• �y �j4
•d4�'�i, '�..:;�pi�:�'r: .4�'ar::�' .is.,< ^.brr.L... �4 Cw3.'
.�at�'{y�i:3:� i
. . .1 ' � .... . . . . . . _ .. . . � . . � �, .
. � � . . � . - � � .. . . . � � . � . . . � �t��. . ..
� :.�=��
�P g, Wachtel(L.ot 29) 1041 Hazard Review&General Submission,Tim Malloy �t� _.�
'�'3
LpNp USE ACI'IONS � •
6. Silver Appeal of Administrative Decision,Francis Krizmanich '' ;, i.;�
7, Mines Taldngs Determination,Tim Ma11oy �t "
g, Crystal Farms Annual Review,Tim Malloy � � '
�t �
g, Crowley Acres PUD Detailed Submission &Final Plat,Tim Malloy ��,�� r
� '
' 9:00 PM ADJOURN '�
=; ��
{,�
.
� . . . .. . . . . . ' :k,•:',,'..
r;a:
-;�
, , .,
:..,C.� .
�:
t: ,`�y.;
'�.�:� . 1'.
�
b
1'�
�'
� \ 2�
l - ,y
,..��.� .:� �� � ..� . �.� . 1 �. :,
� � .. . F: . �.�
♦ ` l '
, t'
�' .
�I
2 : :' �(
t.� �il
i'��
��,� '�� �� .
� I. .
a! �!e:.
1
. . . `�� t '�i.
�
�". .. � - .. ' � ,.,y�..4 r � i
. . . ,,.,� -.L•
. - '"'e �'� �
" ' .
t £� a,
l r�� n
_ � �.��4��'.
. -�. .. i r � $aA��f �
� ` �
�'`;u.'",�c � 4< � � �, r ' ,y
` * � � < � }
� ��- r F'Kjt�`'°}���� �f f' � �. ,::> `
�;w4 ,�r�..s� t��"^4S y s:j'�,,. � / �
' Y 3� YS X i��� f .�.�, � �• :.
l � �x,'p�.��` ' � a r
Yi t.�'"4d1'-S Yr S�h 1 A � � I ' T `t' �:� ! ,
+rs�� .g .� t
y.'����. '� A �y�� � 1 ��� �� �. : - ..
-... �i � Y .., r.�, ( .
, . .. _. J '� � .��.:� .� � ..: 'r
1
S r
+I. 'f" � �J t �A 4 _
F ` �• ? l._'�-.j "
R' :-t v ..y lp .�.'— .
��[�`' r . ..- .
�;....'. .'�Rl �:�• �-:'. �'�,-. , . . . .. -.�:-! .�.�.'.�� . .::�..... . . ' .. .. ._ � : ..'� . . � .. -,' .'. .
:.-,s.,
�„_ -_
�s , ,
. _ . _ . . . __.__.___ ,_.. .. _.__ ,; ' �'��t;
..ki�
; ,i'.G
$. �
�'1/12UUtirj p� •:
/a-� -9 s ' ,�,'tIL!z!
_y' '=..
MINtlTE6 qi;'.c:,
:�; �.�
PITRIN CODNTY BOARD OF COIINTY COMMIBBIONERB '.;,y"`,•''"
. ; (i: : `-:{:�.
� REGIILAR MEETING �tit
! JUNS 28. 1995 •y . �.
� �.,.,r.:.
;
� .� .
_...._ .r
� CALL TO ORDSR: Chairman Ireland called the meeting to order at � At.,'"„ :
3:30 p.�q. �
, CO1�fi88ION MEMBERS PRSSSNT: Mick Ireland, Jim True, Wayne ,'�' �
i Ethridge, Bill Tuite and Bob Child ��-,,,'�
��':
' � �`Y`
CONBENT AGSNDA: ws`'
APPROVAL OF MIN[JTBS OF JIINE 14. 1995 �_
� ' r'
A86IGNMENT OF ATRPORT CiIFT S80P LICENBS AND IISE AGREEMENT FROM ��
� DOREEN GOLDYN TO ABPEN FLIGBT b$CR ,:;,�
�
GREEN PRICING REBOLIITION
Bthridqe moved approval of the Ccnseat Aqenda. With a secoad by �
�
True, the motioa passed unanimously.
� ADMINISTRATIVS ACTION$: '��=�
,,1.._
Bthridqe moved to aQd a request by Elam for a variance reqardinq �
• their hot piant operation.
�ROPOSED FORMATION OF RECREATION DTSTRICT - MOTION TO SET FOR ,�e
- PiIBLIC BEARIN(i ON JOLY 26. 1995 - Tim Malloy asked that the Board
set a public hearing on July 26 for this item. Staff received a
service plan on June 16th for the establishment of a new parks and
recreation district. State Statute requires that the Planning and
�"�- Zoning Commission review the plan and make a recommendation to the ';
� Board. The meeting before the P&Z has been scheduled for next week
so staff will have ample time to turn it around to the Board for
consideration.
��
• . . True moved to aet a public bearinq for the proposed formation of ,
a recreation distriat for Julp 26, 1995. With a second by . � •
Ethridqe, the motion passed unanimously.
ELAM HOT PLAN OPSRATIN(i VARIANCB - MOTION TO APPROVE �����
Sthridqe moved that the Board of County Commissioners allow a one +
� iy-�
,• BOARD OF COOtTTY COMMISSIONERS 1 JIINS 28� 1995 '�
..-��' I�.,_
�i
('
:.•�,:.�� .
� . :�'i�i;;...
f� � j
., � t y�r". Gq � ` 1 ���:r�„� g � �'r�.'� 5- T ._i� � 1 � K
�"�` 7 r�;a��,ff,���,�i+`si"'-T'��k.�cYY�fti'�"�, . . .. .. •C� •.�`? , _ _,.... �14u; �. ..:`� � r
. . � � � . ` . 5:
, . � � . , . �. .- . �t� i
`� . - � . . . � �, � 1; � . . .. -. � � .� i.;. .
� � - . •� - - . - .. . � . , . . . . � .
1 � . . � . . .. � . . � . . � _ :� _ .. . . . . .
1 � _ � � "
. _ . ' r `
— �_ _. _. .r__
�; ; .
,��� .
,,�+�.��-.
:'.� ��5�,,__.,,:3�l �,y �.p� ` �.b� h' �
.
. . . .
.. , ,:. ...,
, . ....,
• �'�C ' ,:•.�RL.?'K77Y���asl''?;VV.. r../y�r�sl,:�`�r.�� .A�.: ��'"� _ �':a:'�4..i �'�"�`�.. ��� 'N��!<.
y x
� �'.
� .�.f
. �.: ��g.�;'
. � i�.. .'vY..)
^p.
� time variance for operation of the Elam Asphalt Hot Plant starting ;,,•
g at 4=30 on Thursday, June 24, 1995. With a second by Child, the + :� `
� motion passed unanfmously. i��:�
,;� BIITURB AGENDAS - BCHSDIILIN(3 ZSSUES - Tom Oken Actin Count �....+.
� g Y (:. .,�
Manager, proceeded to discuss scheduling issues and future agendas �-
with Commission members.
f,` .-. ',.
C
Ireland recessed this portion of the meeting to reconvene at 5:00 $ '
_
p.m. to hear public comment and consider land use public hearings
-- and actions. �
r.:; :
�;:
Chairman Ireland reconvened the regular meeting of the Board of �'�`- '
, County Commissioners at 5:00 p.m.
COt9�I88ION MEMBSRS PRESENT: Mick Ireland, Bill Tuite, Wayne �
Ethridge, Jim True and Sob Child
' i' �-:
PIIBLIC Co2IlSENT: Vice-Chairman Jim True opened the hearing to
public comment. There bei�g no comment, he closed the public ( �
comment section of the meeting.
�.
Co1�4ti882oNER CoLII3ENTS: Tuite said there is still a Plood �}
condition alert in Pitkin County, and when this is all over that
the Board get together and talk about what could have been done
- differently and give more information out to the public on how the
� diversion works. �
{ ADDITIONS/BSLSTiONS TO AGENDA - None t;��
_ , r
LAND IIBS PIISLIC $EARINGB:
. RESOLUTION GRANTIN(i APPROVAL TO T$S 1L�CKEY CARETARfiR DWELLING UNIT
— MOTION TO APPROVS
Commissioner True stated that he wouYd be not be participating in
this matter due to a conflict.
� .
EZlen Sassano, staff planner, introduced this item as an
� application, submitted by Gregg Mackey, for approval of a 661
`--�� square Poot caretaker dwelling unit within a barn, which is
accessory to a recently completed residence. The unit complies
with land use code criteria for caretaker dwelling units and staff
recommends approval.
She noted that she has no written coauaents from the homeowners �� � '
association, but that she had spoken with the secretary of the '
I
assocfation and she indicates that they have had a meeting,
discussed the request and have no opposition. ��
Ireland opened the hearing to public comment. There being no �? :."�
comment, he closed the public hearing and brought the matter back ,�Y-`�.,;;:i
c -t
� 4 =
x BOARD OF COIINTY COZ4IZSSIONERB 2 JUNB 28� 1995 , ��.
�.
� .
, �'-�
�, � � :.-.. :
� t. :�. t�4*.�,,.�,'zlj+� �.�.�i,1.t_t� - . �: �� � .
. ,y b.��ai�Ri".4iT,�B„?.. . . n. TI�'.:'.. 1 . M i.:v� F�.�'§ -GJ�t 1�.� ,'� l ;� �: � .-
' _ , ��5+. �•�L,A� �/
� � - 1 __ . . .. . . . � � •.� � \
1 �; - t t
s
. . . . :-s t;sF . .. .
� ; ,,
- • !.- .
.,. _
:..._ .�. .,_ _. ..._ .._ ;�.__,:
�: , .
,�'��� -
�{ '
_;: ' , .,
. �+M� . ...:�'�.__..41��'...i,. ;J�::,, � . ... .e'. , i. . �'' ." "_.._ ".��A�F��r���`���'iX2�lt�.�'.MILC�C�H$�'�'I�R�'.�f��.
.-�,� F ,�.}
v� �'
� %5'(j,+t�l
� to the Board for action.
; Tuite moved approvai of tbe Mackey oaretaker dwe113ng un3t with ���
conditions aa outlined in the resoiution. With a second by Child, ;�.�.+
! tl►e motion passed aith lour yea votes by Ireland, chiid, Tutte and
` I 8thridge vith True abataiainq.
RSSQ?,DTION GRANTIN(�APPROVAL TO TAS CONNERB CARETARER DWELLIN(i iJNIT , � !'
�.. `��
r1+IOTION TO APPRdVE - Suzanne Wolff, staff planner, introduced this '?�. .-
item as an application, submitted by Mike and Lisabeth Conners, for � ;.�
_.-- approval of a 700 square foot caretaker dwelling unit within an
existing barn, which is accessory to the existing residence. The ,'
caretaker unit complies with all the requirements in the code. ��'`�-
I_r...
I,:.
� She noted that Condition No. 2 states "Prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy" that should be changed to read ^Prior to
issuance of a building permit.�� Also, the homeowners association ,
� did not provide written comments, but verbally stated that they had
no problems with the unit. Staff is recommending approval subject
� to the conditions in ttie resolution.
� Ireland opened the hearing to public comment. There being no
� comment, he closed the public hearing and brought the matter back
; tc the Board of action.
�;
� Child noved approval of the Conners Caretaker Drrellinq IInit with
conditions as outiined ia the resolution vith the amenCment to
� Condition No. 2 as recommended bp staff. With a second by Tuite, .
� the motion passed unanimousiy. '
�� RESOLDTION 6RANTINti APPROVAL OF TAE LEVZNSON SRTENSION OF VESTED �
PROPERTY RTGIiT - Francis Krizmanich, staff planner, introduced this
; � item as an application, submitted by Dan Levinson, for an extension
of a vested property right for approvals granted by the Planning
� Commission and Board of County Commissioners. He proceeded to
, summarize staff�s camments with respect to this request, as
outlined in his memorandum. A copy of his memorandum _is made a
part of this record as B7�iIBIT �'A��. �. �
� Ireland opened the hearing to public comment. There being no
------ comment, he closed the public hearing, and brought the matter back
� to the Soard for action.
True moved approval of the Leviason Bxtensiott of a Veated Psoperty
Riqht subject to the oonQitions outlined in the resolution. With ,
� a second bp Tuite, tha motion passed uaanimouslp. ' :
�$SOLIITION GRANTING A FI9E (5) YEAR SPSCIAL REVIEW DSE PERMIT TO �
THS $L1C MOIINTAIN I,OD(i8 PROPERTY - MOTION TO TABLB TO JIILY 18 1995
( Rick Magill, staff planner, introduced this item as an application,
submitted by Ellen Randall and David Middleton, to request a five
year special use permit for the legalization of the existing � �+'.
, ��_^
� � -
SOARD OB COIINTY COMISISSIONERS 3 JIINE 28� 1995 �:,
F �:
�; � f'
�:; -
;t;::,
; ,., � .
,� ., .
,`'F> „.s: �. �: .,. _ }' 1�, .
. . . . . . . � . _.. . : . ��. .
. -� .. _ . . � , _. . . . . . . . .._ �._.� �`
t; _
- �. . � . . . (_ -..
, _ . . . �.. . . . ,
I . .. � . .. - ..:j: � .. •
1 . _
__ _ .. ._ _� :� _ .
. �
,�• � � •
. �
r;��,�. - - .
Y�
_��2: � , • ..
. . ,,,>,..M
�� ,,ti�,:,.�.
,F�.
{
1
' � residential units on the Elk Mountain Lodge property. Also, a �;�.`;�s!!,`±
� request £or a Spec3a2 Use Permit for the use of the main level o£ ; `=,.
the existing lodge structure as a clubhouse or recreational ;.
� building in connection with an accessory to a permitted outdoor i �`'+
recreational use. He roceeded with his g g `*":.�'
p presentation re ardin �
- this application as summarized in his memorandum to the Board. A �%,'-y:,
copy of this memorandum with attachments, is made a part of this
record as ESHxHZT ��H��.
A dfscussion ensued with re ard to the RO unit located on the � " !`�
g �:z.::
propertY• �:;-:�, ::
.__ - ': � :
� Ellen Randall said that she wants the current resident to be able ��„� .
j to stay in the unit. :�?�::
Ireland moved that the appliaaat be subject to a Yental restrictioa
quaranteeinq a minimum six month lease to a qualiPied 2ocaY !``':
resident. That restriotion to take place upon vacation of the �`
; cnrrent tenant under her current term. Thereafter, the unit be Fr
subject to the resiQent occupied quidalines as a8opted by the
Hoard. j ,
- A discussion ensued with regard to allbwing weddings on the
property. �'
� �
Konchan noted that the code refers to "Outdoor recreational uses." j
• . She does not think when the code was drafted, staff had more of a i
recreational emphasis on their minds. �
,
Ellen Randall said they have had requests to ho2d wedding ;
receptions on several occasions, and they would like the
opportunity to hold such events at the lodge. She presented two
letters in support of her application. A copy of these letters are
, attached hereto and made a part of this record as EXHIBIT ��C��. � .
�
Perry Harvey said the residential restrictions and requirements are �
. fine. He referred to Item 1 of the proposed resolution it says ;
that if the planning director determines that they are not in
compliance they can come to the board and recommend that the �
approval be repealed. What they would like is some leeway that ii.
?�, ` would give them a 30 day notice to correct, after which �
�— E
_ Harvey referred to the condition regarding the applicant submitting �
a roads improvement plan to the County Engineer for approval. He
said he has no idea what would be looked for as a road improvement
- plan nor do they have any idea about a pro-rata share of the '
improvements, and they need this addressed. ,
With reqard to the issue of the fisherman access easement, it was ' '
their understanding that the granting of the access easement went �
against part of the cantractual mitigation for the impact of the :
lodge. By definition the easement is five feet from the high water �
BOARD aF COIINTY COMHISSIONERS 4 JIINS 28� 1995 � �`+.
. . '.T`•c';
� ,` —
� j,'
i
���v:�,"'�,,, ��'"�-s�F��z."�u, ;..a wi. �rx�:, _ ;t �,} a :u.,,; '� ' : t !
a i 4, �c« xa -� �.�,�.art� t.�,�. r
i _ ' , ' �
� ,.
. . --a . `.. . � � . . . . . . � �� .�i
, �: _ �I��
; .
,. . , ,
1 �,
- -- _,_ . :.._ :._ . r
�: � -
`�.��w '
��• .
�iA,.�'.. .. ��Y�'i_ :z4'da�'3.th i-9_.. - . ., ,. . . '..� '. .. . i:{�'.w`�afifiWh�.a.E�tu�h'A���i�T�!"G�i�::,r�e�3�+�F1#1�,�x�."yi1+�i�`. ' .::�y,:i'�
• , �:f,, r'�i��.
� k
,'e•
i y�� f`
e �F��� ��:
�:,���<;
mark. He submitted two letters, which he said talks about the "�
fractual nature of a particular area where beaver ponds exist. A •��-�;
copy o£ these letters are attached hereto and made a part of this - �.�
^ record as ERBISIT •�D��, }.�; .,.
� '� ,.••+'.
Tuite noted that staff pointed out in their memorandum that there c :.. .�r
E is already an easement in place right now, that easement is on the `:-
books and there is no way for the board to undo that easement. tt:: :. ;:
r:;;;
Harvey said he would still like a clarification on the other two ������'
_. -_ issues regarding the right to a notice of non-compliance and the ��'�.-•�"':
road improvement issue. ^a�
. ,'i'�,;-.`
`_..:r.��..
Magill said with respect to the road improvements plan, he
indicated in the memo that what is being talked about, is the :
Castle Creek/Maroon Creek intersection at Aighway 82. Se said ;'..�;:
there are some large projects going on up there, and based upon � `
vehiale trips generated, staff feels that the applicant should pay �'�i
' that pro-rata share. He said the road improvemettts plan may be a
little bit misleading, but it speaks to the intersection.
� Konchan said the way the county has dealt with pro-rata is based �:`r .'
! on the average number oE daiZy dzips generated by the proposed use. ��
z So they would look at the 35 car limit for a calculation for the
� other units on the property to come up with how many trips they
. " believe this site would generate to the intersection. What the
� code is suggesting that the board has to approve a plan that would �
� bring the road into compliance with capacity standards before new
� development is approved. That actually goes in line with what the
� Castle/Maroon Creek Caucus Consensus Statement asked for in its ;,�,•
� request for development analysis in their planning areas. The
� problem is that these issues are being debated in length in the
� context of larger applications up Castle and Maroon Creek Road.
At a minimum, if the board is inclined to go forward with the
application despite the capacity issues at the intersection staff
� would aqree that first sentence of Condition No. 16 should be �•
� stricken. }
, 2reland moveQ that the condition state ��if road improvementa are
.„� _�_ � doae prior to the espiration or aertifiaate of oacupancy then ahe .
will be responaible !or a pro-rtita ahare of the improvementa based
' on total tratfia volumea. With a second by Tuite, the motioa 3:
passed unanfmonsly.
'i
' ' John Wilcox expressed his concerns with respect to the application. ''
A copy of his written comments associated with this issue is "
attached hereto and made a part of this record as EXHIBIT ��E'�.
A discussion ensued with regard to the issue of whether or not ��
weddings are an outdoor recreational use. .
_4'.
. 2��'� '�-�'
BOARD OF COIINTY C014IISSIONERB 5 JIINB 28� 1995 �`' t
. �,
; ;;�,j
. ,.,,
LC{
1'�' ;K;rr�4�.�is3'=Z.��;^ Y ^l� r �. �,6 , .
- / . .. . . . ' 4 . `::�� �� 9.. '�� .
. h j
� _ _ , . :� .
, �. ,
�
, . .. .
, . . ;, .
. ` , . . . . I. . . . ' . . .
.. . - . . . . . . . � .' ' � � . ' .
�: � .. � . . . .. ' . . .' , •
. i���.` ' � . ' . ,
'-� � .
jY�
,�Ja-� .. ...��L •:Cu;'.>.. �- ....., . _ .. . � . � � . � . ....... .�..._.._..._._.__.__. ..._ ...._ _._ � a...
� r i��A�,,
.G *�.' �`'
� i��,
�'0
� } .. �.
• ; . �yy't�'
' Ti.� .,�Y{;��
� Ireland reiterated that he thinks weddings are an outdoor ,�� .
t recreational activity. ; �;�
- Jim Franics, representinq Che Maroon/Creek Caucus, submitted ��� x�
letters to the planning office stating their position on this �� "-
matter. A copy of these letters are incorporated in the above �'i.•
referenced Exhibit B.
�.:"s:.
After a discussion, commissioners expressed a conaern as to whether r
or not they could grant any use that all agree is an outdoor ''-a.. ,
----- - recreational use without having a principal use to support it and ' .
�..±`�`.'
that they need time to have the staff attorneys analyze that issue, r,;:;:
�,�' .
Ring Woodward, representing the Meadowood Homeowners Association
expressed a concern with reqard to the increased number of vehicles � ..
on Maroon Creek Road. `
ZreZand said the caucus needs to review the issues and provide i
additional comments. Also, staff needs to look into four issues.
He summarized these issues as follows: ' -
1. The underlying issue about whether you can have two �
principal uses on the property.
;
2. The transportation issue and the size of the parking lot. i
3. The number of events per year and whether they should be
limited on a weekly basis.
4. What does constitute an outdoor recreational use.
1Conchan note3 that the appliaant requested a 3o day non-complianae �
notice. Bhe saggested thaY the condition ba cbangad to read ��No
� publia hearing would be held prior to a 30 day nobice of the
applicant beinq given.�� I! in that 30 period they rectify the
aituation thea they aan come to the board at that time having the
ability to represent that.
� � Ireland said they could agree that there would not be any hearing
'�, scheduled befora the board less than 30 days aftez the non-
-�------ compliance notice from the planning director.
Child suggested that rather than talk about the number of vehicles
talk about the numbers of people who could attend each function.
, So possibly at the next meetinq people nwnbers can be talked about i
rather than vehicles. ,
True moved to table this matter and aontinue the publia hearinq to
July 18, 1995 at 3:00 p.m. With a second by Child, the motion
pasaed unanimously. j
Ireland suggested that the Crystal Farms Special Review Use Annual
�"'..
; .�.:
BOARD OF CODNTY COMMIBSIONERS 6 JUNE 28� 1995 :='=�_•r
� !� -
`:n;
� ' �.
#.'�i
�
� .. .. . . S.1N '..k-`.t .+'r' .. � .." St' .f�, k k 4� - Y - . .^I:.��k,e4,1'�„
/' � �. �. ' - � . . �� ' ,`. . . . `,� "l; .
h
� _.. . � � � . � .. � T! ' i
:` .... . ., � . . � . - �. � • . —.. . . . J `
� � .. . . � � . . . � � � . . .
1 � '.
1
� . � .. . - _ � , �
� . . . _ ..,._.. ._ ,_. ..__ . , i ... � • - � . / ' .
� �; . . . ... . - : � _ . . . . , . . . ,
t�8'sMy� �.. , ' ' ' . ,
`{ •
�
::::.;: , ..
:+��' �_ . ., .. ,
. .. �':.�.y�'A�..kl����f�.. !���i:�.. .. ..,, ...,; , ....:� . ' a[+�f,kC�::a..'�:�t'�'i.,s�1X6H•'s"14�L�aS1&.`Y3xhau.ii6TSL�i:4�.'��:G? + E���,.
� .`'t:��i-
.� ::'.F,:%
�s
�Yti
,4..
�' }(�`,,
; � � .,»Fa'�-
Review be considered at this time since the applicants have ~��. .
traveled from Redstone for their hearing. i�.�
' �..;�a
� Commissioner Tuite needed to leave the meeting due to an emerqenap. � •
y.,...
CRYSTAL FARMS BPECIAL REVIEW II8E ANNUAL REVIEW - MOTION TO APPROVE ; ;,, �'''
Ireland declared a conflict with regard to participating in this �;-
matter.
f..:*::- '•.
�
� Tim Malloy, Staff Planner, introduced this item as an application,
.___.. submitted by Steve Kent, for an annual review for a special review �.
use for the C stal Farms in Redstone. Ae proceeded with his y�'�
�Y I;".,_.
presentation on this matter as outlined in his memorandum to the �;-
board. A copy of this memorandum is attached hereto and made a ��;"•=� '
part of this record as SSRZSIT ��F��
Commission membexs asked staff to notify the neighbor who voiced �
i complaints to submit something specific in writing. �q
i
Steve Kent proceeded with his comments regarding the issues � N �
" associated with the application. A copy of his written comments °
with attachments, is attached hereto and made a part of this record �.
as SRBIBIT °a°, .
True asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to speak �
_ to this application. There being no comment, he brought the matter �
back to the board for action. t
Child said there is one issue which has been talked about that has ;
not been answered and that is the recommendation by staff that the �
annual review be a staff review unless there is some problem. He
thinks given the past history, that he could support that.
� Child moved approval of the annual review with conditions, ��
directinq tbat further annual reniew be done by staff unlesa there
is an issue. Also, directiag ataff to prepare a rasolution of y
� I findinq. With a second bp 8thridqe, the motion passed with three �
yea votas aad oae abstentioa by IrelanA. i;.
i '
` MINEB TARIN[i bSTERMZNATZON - Tim Malloy, Staff Planner, noted that i
�' " the draft resolution in the packet should be removed or amended �
_----
� because there ie a discrepancy between the P&Z's finding and the ;
� Board's detertaination regarding an alternative site on the property ;
i that has not been explored. In fact, the applicant was requested ;
to explore other alternatives prior to coming back for a takings
' hearing. , '
1
Ireland auggested a motion to rescind any previous motions and !
aQopt this resolution as writtea with the chanqe in the seaona to f;
the last paraqraph on paqe 3 to reaQ ��The 8oard supports the 4
findinqa of the Planniag and 2oninq Commission vith the exception
� that the board does not find fihe lot to be unbui2dab2e. � �_.-
� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSZONERS 7 JIINB 28, 1995 � .� _
f, ` .
I
� �,.
� " .�� �.
i,.
.. � , ,,., Y .. �. � . ., -- �
� �;y. a?...,�,.a3�i�"`[��'!C�+...'�s),��;..;. . .. . . .<<.4 ��. n'�; .�..;� �� c;t,� .:i x:
. . � . . ' . .. .. .�� . ,. . ..��.
. � ' � .. � . - : . ��� r
�
t
� � � . - �, . . . .
. ; . .+. ....... ..:.
� , . . . . . . . . � . .
. .. � .t' � . . . .. . . � . . . .
i . .. , . . . . . . . . . . ' �.. .. . . . ,
. � ' � � - . .. . � .. ' - - . . . . .
. � . . . � . . . .
. � �_ .. .. . . .�,� ... � � ._' ' . � . . . . ( � , . �
�
. � :._ . ._.'._ ..r_ ,—- -�._ .': ..._!'_... ' ' .. .. . . .
�: .� . � . . � _ . � � .. . ; ... � - ., � .
`��P`"*'"- , . .
;�
, ^ .
,:_,., _ ,
o-r:r•�- : .. ._ ._ ... . __._._._. _._._.,, . ..
'�si±F�., .
' � .,kr,�.i'.�ti'.
, y�.
d :a
� �� �.'�v ,�51
' 8thridge moved the amendment as per the suqqestion by Ireland. ��: +�
; �� .c�
� Child aeaonded the motion. � . �
�
I��;.'...
- Brooke Peterson, representing the applicant, said he thinks it is ��,.
inappropriate at this point in time to brush a resolution at them `�y.�-
and say this is the resolution we want to adopt because that was %;,�_' "�
I not the finding or the basis for the hearinq. Also, he does not : +.
think that it is appropriate that scenic quality is discussed in f �'
the resolution. J
,g;.,
---- -- Ethridge noted that the resolution was in the packet at the April `" +" '
12th meeting date. tr=y��`
:`a*.--'
. Bthridqe moved to amended his motion to atrike Item #. 2-12 -
Saeaic Qualitp. Child accepted this to hia second. The motion ��°
passed uaanimously. � �
Malloy proceeded with his presentation, as outlined in his �.�
memorandum to the board dated June 28, 1995. A copy of this memo ••
is attached hereto and made a part of this record as EXHIBTT ��H��.
Malloy said he, just today, received an appraisal Erom R.H. Reeves. N�
He said that staff does have some differences of opinions with the �;
appraisal. Therefore he thinks it would be prudent for the County s'`
to have this reviewed by an appraiser of its own. He pzoceeded to
- . � briefly review the appraisal noting the points of disagreement
including comparables used, which are located in the Lazy O Ranch. �
Child noted that in the case of Lazy O there is a situation where
there is a roadway which has been constructed, that there are all ;i�t�e
the utilities in place and it is ready to build. '"�
Ireland said the Pitkin County Assessor changed the assessed
� valuation from the purchase price of $77,000 down to $75,000. He
also reflects that since 1978, the value of the property has gone
. from $30,000 �`
Brooke Peterson proceeded with his presentation regarding this
matter. He submitted several letters from various consultants who
1, are workinq on their project. A copy of these documents are
- ---- attached hereto and made a part of this record as E%HIBIT ��I��. '�
'j�
Peterson continued withi his presentation as outlined in his letter
of April 26, 1995. A copy of these written commets is attached
, hereto and made a part of this record as ExHIHIT ��J'�. ,
,-• .
After a discussion, it was the consensus of commission members that `
this matter should be tabled pending the applicant looking into
other alternatives for the location of the building envelope. �.,
'�. :;�;.,:
� BOARD OF COUNTY COPII�tISSIONERB 8 JIINE 28, 1995 i� �. .�;'
�1 � I' .:
'� y' f �
e
. F? ...ti",Zi�i�`��"'E*K�'�.f,�e'f 'w.y� :N... . -. ,Fx ., ;r . ... . .� . - .: ���
r . .. . � • �� y`.
' � . . � . . . . _. .. . . .p . . 3'
' . , �` — . : � . .- - . - . - . -.. . .. � . " � . �I t
� . . . . . � �, . . -- � '� ,
_ �` ' •. . . . . . . . , . . . � .
. i - . .. � � . , .. � • � � � � . . . -.'i�.f%' � � .� . .
� I ,
, , ,_ : . r
' __ .._ _ _. ___ .,
�; , , .
�.f�y , . , � . -
��
. ��.;.. �� . .� . . � , ..
'�� .. ..�:�<��,s �r;�,._ s�w,; . , , �... .�. . . _,. _
... ,. _ . _ _ ._ � _ ..... . _ _ h, ��,,
;;;, r:�
_ �v�.
it xae agreed that fiadinq no. C �hould be eliminated, and tiadinq �?'r%.��'�
bo. D aAanqed to C. That la�lquaqe be added to the last sentenae ��; � -
i of c WIIiah states ��The Board of County Commissionars supporta the [_' �`:,.
' findiaqa ot the Pianning and Zoning Commiasion with the exception , �."��
that the Board does not think the site is anbuildable.�� ;•t;�%.,.
i ;•L��
RESQLIITION GRANTIN(3 1041 EPNIRONMENTAL HAZARD REVIEW AND GENERAL
� SUBMISSION APPROVAL FOR TH8 WACHT$L P80PERTY RNdWN A8 LOT 29 OF TH$ � �
80PRI8 HOIJNTAIN RANCH SIISDiVISION - MOTION TO APPROVB - Tim Malloy, %'�� ;�
staff planner, introduced this item as an application, submitted -�:-:;:::i. .:
by Luke and Ann Wachtel, for 1041 Hazard Review and General
Submission for construction of a single-family residence. The �':`r `:
� property contains areas mapped for severe wildfire hazard, geologic
hazards and wildlife habitat. Fie roceeded with his �•�.�°""�
p presentation +;-,- .
�., ..
associated with this item as outlined in his memorandum to the
Board dated May 10, 1995. A copy of this memorandum is attached
hereto and made a part of this record as E7QiiBIT ��R��. 'c,
` biailoy noted that there were two chanqeg which he wouid like to ��
;
� make to the resolution. Ona, to iaclude a condition no. 4 that �'
� this matter was heard at a pub2ic hearing on Map 10 and June 2. "
�a
Becondly, that a liae be added that the resolution was adopted on `�
JuIIe 28� 1945. �7
Ireland opened the hearing to public comment. There being no �`}
comment, he closed the public hearing and brought the matter back �
to the board for action.
8thridge moved approval of the Resolution approving the Wachtal �
spplination. With a second by True, the motion pas$ed unanimously.
�ZLVER APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION �
- �„efer to ERHIBIT ��M�� for a verbatim Transariot o! this �roceeding �'
�SSOLOTION GRANTSNC3 DETAZLED BiJBMISBION/RINAL PL11T APPROVAL OF T$S
CROWLEY ACTtEB/SIIBDSVISION/PUD. - Tim Malloy, Staff Planner, ?
introduced this item as an application, submitted by Ray T.
\ � Crowley, Wanda L. Beitz, John C. Crowley and Janet L. Woolsey, for �
Detailed Submission and Final Plat approval to subdivide Parcel 4
�!:______.� of the Claude Crowley Estate South in three lots for single family ���
+ � residential use and one open space parcel. He prooeeded with his !
presentation regarding this item as outlined in his memorandum to �
� the Board dated 6-28-95. A copy of this memorandum is attached
i hereto and made a part of this record as EIQiIBIT ��L��. '
� . . i
i
Malloy noted that there is one modifiaation to Recital No. 3. It
; should be amended to read "County Road 4j . '
� Ireland opened the hearing to public comment. There being no
comtaent, he closed the public hearing and brought the matter baak
to the Board for action.
� BOARD OF COONTY COMMISSIONERS 9 JUNE 28, 1995 f :s""`�
;-. j
f,
�'.
� � �. .. �t z 'c��: f a� ' : . T! .
. . s �� a
•. ..,- f— . . . . , . � . . .. .3�< ;.� .'-
� . . � . . � ' . y . � ,,.,.
_ ... . . . ' . Y
f
. . . . � 4. � � t
*. _.
� � � � � . . � .. . �'.'�:-i '
l i � . .
� ' .
_. _._ . ...-. - _ -c._ . r
�:
�.f`T ; .
,{7 .
_,:♦.srt . � / . .. . . -I � . . . . ... � ' f'�i t't�l.,
rS� � -�rt���
�,.
4� �.
� �` �:
17
� Bthridqe moved approvai o! the Crowiey Acres subdivision netailed _.
Submission and Fiaal Piat. With a second by Tuite, the motion �1 �_�
passed unanimousiy. + ;;��
- �p.TpIIgNMgl�s_ The meetinq was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. 4c,°`+ `i y,�
i'
c :_
ectfully s 'tted, �'�` .
4 S'
� . N=
. . � ,/_ "° . . �"+*�,;
•i/rl �
4�tiW'�, `i
J nette Jones ir '� ' '.
- C erk to the ard of ount ,EOmmissioners w ��, .
/ �
� �� �C ���j . f��
Michael C. Ire and, hairman " '' ,�,;:� ,'
Board of County Co issioners • '
'�':.
..
-.:.. _ . R_ ,:n, .
. . . . . . . � . . � � .��:.
. ..� _ � ..i}
- {.
�
�f'�
��,
- �,
: .. . . . . ._ . ,� .�
:._. . _.. .. . ��: . .' .� .. , ._. . .�- r
� ..
. . . - . . . . � � . � j. .
ti
�� � � , . � � . .
__ . - . � .. . � . � - . . _ . � . . .. : . .. .. _ � �.• .t.
, a
,�,
J� 28� 1995 ' � �:
B011RD OF COD21'PY COMMISSIONERB 10 � '�
��',
� .;`
t. r.'`
, ' i
`� ,
.. ' _�T Tn d4� laZ:!^ � { � 'N
\' t - � K-,-e ):'' S r'l t
" ¢L t�,
/ � �- '�. 6�T,k^c`1�
�. n .��. 'Y ,-� ��YP��'; \
t � ! E �lfi�
��r �'� i� b � ��
: j- �S "�r�r�� '� � r�:- ..y
\ �
�M l'3� s"Sn F - � �
I ����F� f� , � 7 f ,-� r� / .
..l x4� � ^ �, ,�
� �
1. , ,
t ,r, ,
�.J h� �'�'
�. � .
t �
;` � 3.�t ..s:� _ _ -
� �r i ,`
�i�l�n � . _ .
o.dr .
� Y;n.
. . :.'u+'.ti".
�i -•;;r,��;.
j fo-as�4s . kE
�
� r�toxaxnurt ��.: +�`;
• j ,,.
t TO: Board 'of County Commissioners �
� .
Regular Meeting - June 28, 1995 � '`�
i �::�`�
THRU: Suzanne Konchan, Community Development Department `.''�.y:
�� FROM: Francis Rrizmanich, Deputy Director I.' "�+
� RE: Levinson Extension of Vested Rights ��
,� .
�--��_�---- ----�_- ---=-------�-_ i
__., . _.- t^z- '
APPLICANT: Dan Levinson 4'��'
,�';
� RBQIIEST: The applicant is requesting extension of a vested
property right for approvals qranted by the P2anning Commission r
(Scenic Overlay) and the Board (General Submission/1a41 Aazard �
Review). The subject property is impacted by steep slopes in
' excess of 30$ and severe wildfire hazards. The Board approved this
, application on February 9, 1993; therefore, the current vested �'
" right wi11 expire on Fehruary 9, 1996. �
LOCATION: The property is located off of Wrights' Road and is Lot �
5A, Block 3 of the Revised Red Mountain Subdivision. �
- BTAFF COMMBNTS: The lot is located within a severe wildfire hazard �
area and contains slopes in excess of 30�. TYte current Land Use �
Code, adopted June 28, 1994, prohibits development within these �
hazard areas. �
While the sta£f would generally have grave concerns approving N$
development within a severe wildfire hazard area that includes �
. slopes greater than 30�, our normal opinion is modified by the �
unique facts related to this projecc. Because the current vesting ;
period e�tpires in February, 1996, the applicant may guarantee his
future development rights by obtaining a building permit prior to '
expiration of the existing vested right, if the extension request ; .
- is not granted. Further, the current wording in the Code states
that devaZopment approvals for single family residences da not ;
; expire. Therefore, it is the staff opinion that we cannot deny
, development on this property; we may only modify conditions of
approval, if appropriate. Other considerations include the fact i
that the subject property is located within approximateZy 5 minutes !
_ . of the Aspen fire station and the proposed residence will be !
� , connected to the muni.cipal water system, thereby guaranteeing
adequate fire flows. In a@dition, the conditions attached to this ,
approval are quite extensive and even exceed the existing code
standards in some instances.
SDMMARY: The staff supports granting a three year extension of
j vested rights to the applicant for the reasons outlined above. A �
; resolution of approval is attached. � ..�.'-�
�" � RECOSYIISENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested ' S �
extension of vested rights. ' �'
� '
�. - - .�...w..- . ...-.� � ."" ..�... .�._...�_.._-..-..__ __._.� w J`'�;� .
� /� . . . � ..� . . + � �- .. � �IF�J i ^
� � .. .. ' . . . . . ' . . . . .. i . �i �.
. . , . . .. . . - �� �
. . . . . . - .. � •
. . � - �,'r .� �� � - . � � � �
. �` � -. � . . �> . . . '- .. . . ti
� . . �. . � . . . � ' . . . �. . �:
� , _ - . .� . . � � , i ��� .. � � ..
\ ; r � ,
,, � ` ,:: , f
.. ._._ . _�_-. :.;_.:�__. _. . :. ...r.�.,.�•. . ��,... . . .
�: - .. . � � ' . � . � . � . . a� . . . . . . .. . ' , .
���jin: .
Y'� •
. _________ __-----
. - ._.�. _.____ _
.
.: „ .,
:>�:°"'" .. . . -- � . ..:: .:. _-
- . �rrsl f,��5 •:
�• Y
4
� �p-29A5 �`•
�� ,;�f' 'i:�
� r,, •::
' � i•7;, `-:::
MEMORANDIIM
� ?���'•c�
4 TO: Board of County Commissioners � �•:'r.••:��
Regular Meeting - June 28, 1995 I -',:�;;��•'�-
.1 :Z.
TffitII: Suzanne Ronchan, Community Development Director �`'x,'r° '�r
!4_ •
RS: Blk Mountain Lodge Special Review Use Permit '� i�
- ::.J� 7 :�.:
BAOM: Rick Magill, Planner
_:._ ���Y =°�----��� �__---=__-=_= ''�`'r'
. �t�Ak A
REQIIE9T: The A licant is re ^ ' � � ``�`��^�
pp questing a five (5) year special use
permit for the legalization of the existing residential units on
the Elk Mountain Lodge property. The Applicant also is requesting �""
a Special Use Permit for the use of the main level of the existing �w
Lodge structure as a "clubhouse or recreational building in ���
connection with and accessory to a permitted outdoor recreational :�Y�
use��. '',��
. • ��':
APPLICANT: Ellen Randall and David Middleton ! ,
APPLICANT'8 REPRESENTATIVE: Perry Harvey � ,;�-x
LOCATION: The subject property is located between Castle Creek �
" and Castle Creek Road, approximately 12 miles from the intersection ! ,
of Highway 82.
ZONING: AFR-10 ten acre minimum lot size -�
i i l� „+
�;j;"�
SZTE DATA: The property consists of appzoximately 54 acres. All �
existing structures are located in the northern 1/3 of the i�
• property. Castle Creek runs through the property from south to '? •
north. There are numerous ponds and extensive wetland/riparian
areas associated with the Creek on the subject property. �' iz.
;
_ REFBRRAI, AGENCY CO�IENTS: Referral comments are incorporated
throughout this memorandum and are attached as necessary
�
�
=�' 1. County Engineer �
2. County Attorney
3. Zoning Office
4. Environmental Health Department y
- 5. Housing Office
' 6. Maroon/Castle Caucus • � - , �
7. Aspen Fire Protection District !
eACRGROUND: The subject site has had a long and involved history "
of land use approvals and an equalZy involved history of ownership. �'
� A swnmary is as follows: ���
� 1979- Approval was granted to redevelop the existing lodge use with i�',-' � _
�i a main lodge, assorted guest aabins, four employee units and . �
'i�,
��.
! .�cy �
�
! "r,t�v
z�;.✓ ::�aur�,-_'�_'". . .._� . _.__._._ . _ . . .c"�. I Y�'7
.. /,^ ... ... • � - '�� 1�
� -, � . _ . � � .. � .- . . . . . � . .. q �.,, w.
. . . � ' ` � ,, . . t� �
� c+ .
. �.
i . . . .- . - . • _ ., : . .. . .
.� � � . .. - . . . . � . : �.� . � . . . . . .
_ ' � �.:!( �:.:.., �'._:_ . � . . - � . � . � -. � '; .. ; �.�.� . .� ^ i .
, .. . .. / ._ . . .. _ . • . . . . � . .. . r ' ,.
. . �.� �-'-.. ._.�� ._-- �.�-�_ __.. _., �.:_�.. . ��.:. . �
. . _,,..�_. . .. _ . .
�; � . . . � . � �. . .. _ . .. . . .. . .. .. _ . . . -. : , •
��� _ _ ._ .
;;�t
. , . _ ......_..�...�_ ._
la"�.�a. ..., . :�.,...__......_ .._.. _. ,. ..._. . /_. .. rtt�a:wS's:ii..:.:a.idG«Y3'yk`:Sia:�:=:'��:5iy�i..�; ';aa�i�'�.
M3;..;•.,��;.��.
� �:iyj�._ �
2
! iLati.
° ' `����?�
:� , �
;;°, _
' accessory structures (barn and bunkhouse). At that time, there were •�
t 17 se arate buildin s ro osed to contain 29 uest and em lo ee ,.
R P 4 P P 9 P Y F:.'= �`;,
bedrooms. 3''•• "'a
i,}.:'...:'.
1981- Approval of the relocation of two cabin's. �,.r',,,�:_;
•,�4�:....,
1982- A , � ti;•,-
pproval of new stables food service a store and other �;- s:
minor site changes. `��''- �'
-'•.�;�_"`
1986- Approval of an amendment to the 1979 approval to create 23- '±�'��:^:
;.5;,':r;.�"
room free-market lodge with a restaurant and five employee units. ,:;.�, .
-"-" The Lodge appears to have received what can be called "demolition �=x '
credits" for a number cabins which were removed from the property. �.1�`��.
Construction began on the Lodge and the building exterior was �
substantially completed, although the required building inspections .��+
were never done, nor was a Certificate of Occupancy issued. iI�
�
During the years from 1979 to 1986, the property changed ownership k�`�
several times. The original owners sold to a partnership, which ' �
beqan to construct the Lodge. Due to financial problems, work was
halted, a foreclosure proceeding was initiated, and the property ,','��'
eventually sold to a Canadian Corporation. A death of one owner put �
the property up for sale and it transferred to an individual who ,,,,,
later sold it to the current owners.
1992- Resolution No. 92-95 sought to clarify the previous lodge
� approvals; however, it also set forth timelines for construction '�
to be commencad and completed. It also provided a framework for an
owner to request an amended land use approval, given that the site ;-:
was currently under contract for sale and the new owners intentions '�;;��
'i were undetermined.
Subsequent to adoption of Resolution 92-95, the pending contract
� was terminated and the site was subsequently sold to a new owner,
Greg Mosher. Mr. Mosher submitted an amended land use request in is,
September of 1992 (pursuant to the BOCC resolution) for a 50�
V � density reduction lot split. Following submission of the
application, the land again sold (through a land exchange involving
property in Wyoming), this time to the current owner, Ms. Randall ',
_�.._� and her son, David Middleton. The Lot Split application was '!
- subsequently withdrawn by the Applicant.
All previous land use approvals for the Elk Mountain Lodge have
. lapsed.
� E%ISTING CONDITIONS: The site currently contains structures which. i �
are described below:
1) Cabia "A"- Carley/Manager unit: This dwelling is located closest (�'
to Castle Creek Road and is under a lonq term lease with the former �j 4 �
owners of the property, Liz Carley. This unit contains , .�. �y,-,
approximately 260o square feet and includes a garage and tackroom. .;+ ,. �r:;
t �
( 2 '
� ���,
x�`' �
a,
� �',
� - ---�-�.,�:...W..:�;�±.:�.�:..-.....----j ..._w £M i
�� '��,�
/ ` �,.
� , o (
, ti sc :
� � _ ,;.:` :
`` ,. f .
; .
: . . :y,
� � ' ` � : .
� r
. _ �. -_ ;:.
�.
�: , �
.���. • .
.-�.
:x� -
s;,: " , ..
� J . .a.��.......... . . . . .. . ' . . _. . . ,
...'.._..... ....�. '_ " , _ .,.. .,
� . . . . . . - . . .. _.......___:_... .._ �tY ;ki,''..
1 }x t
i
; K t
i 4-
-��
� �!� '
j C .'•.
r 2) Buildinq "B": This is a barn with horse stalls and a tool shop. �,, ,
�� ,'�a
3) Cabia "C-East": This cabin next to Cabin "D" is 360 square feet
- in size, with a bath and kitchen. z •
�...;+,�
t; ...
4) Cabin "C"-West": This cabin, which is located next to the r ;.
Warming Hut, is approximately 820 square feet in size. !`' . ;+
5) Cabia "D": This cabin consists of approximately 1,00o square
--- - feec. This structure currently contains two residential units (one ;r;,_
upstairs/one downstairs) tha� are accessed separately. :.�=%; :
���•�
. 6) 8istoric Cabins (2) "E" & Narming Hut: Two historic cabins and r "'
the Warming Hut were approved as accessory structures to the lodge, ;�:•`"^ .
not intended for overnight sleeping purposes. The concept was that i�:
these structures would be used by lodge guests during cross-
� country skiing and other recreational activities. One of the cabins �
was recently improved with a bathroom and kitchen without the �`r'
. . i benefit oP County permits (prior to transfer of ownership to Ms.
! � Randall) . The area of this cabin has been extensively landscaped
� and has an exterior deck and hot tub.
" I
7) Lodge Suilding "F": This log structure was approved for 17,460
�
square feet of floor area, 23 lodge rooms, a 50 seat restaurant and s
a small service store. Construction was abandoned by former owners '
- ' and all building permits have expired due to the lack of �'
continuation of work. There have been no occupancy permits issued �
and the interior is largely unfinished, with only a portion of the
second floor being accessible via stairs. There is also an area
open to the lower walk-out level, presumably an elevator shaft. The �
structure was a2lowed to be used for the "American Indian '
- Celebration", under a temporary use permit issued by the County ;
several years ago. �
STAFF COMMENTS ON THE PROPaSAL: �'
� .
� The A licants are ro osin to "le alize" the existin residential {� �
PP P P 5 5 q ,� .
*a.
_ units in the following manner: �
� 1) Cabin "A": The Applicant is proposing to deed restrict this unit ? _
to Resident Occupied status. The current resident of this unit, Liz
Carley, was a previous owner of the Elk Mountain Lodge property.
-�- Ms. Carley has a contractual agreement with the current owners of
� the property which permits her to occupy this unit rent-free until �
the year 2006. The Housing Office has indicated that Ms. Carley
qualifies for the RO status, because she lives there full-time ahd ,•
she is employed in Pitkin County. c.
NoTB: The definition and terms of the Resident Occupied category a
have not yet been finalized by the Board of County Commissioners, �`.
therefore, the deed restrictions for these units may be subject to � �-;
#
3 � 4� -
;
��,;
p-.i I;,
6 i
� . k�`. .:.���"'.
, ' _'
�. '—.. --....oa.�.0 .,.._u.�'y:�:�=* '� �,...� ..._........---.. ._..__'—'
.��� -.� . . � . � � � _ � .� ~�~�
. ,. C _ �.. ,.` .. . . � . '- . . .. _, ..
r .`. - �,,�-
• ' � '
' , ,:.
; , , . `,,
, .r. -- � - . �,�` - -:
� , �; � �' y
. .
, ,. - ,
,.r• ; _ ,,,
i . • . =� ..
\ ' r �, .
,. ,, ' , , �. f _
..:: •
�. : ,. ,,. _ : 1 '. .
� . ��.. .._ _�_ _. _�.�.. ---,-��- .� .:...�.i _>. . ,.��....�� � . � . . .� . .
� . � . . .. . ., . . �... -� ..._-.
� . . - � . �. . .. . . _. . � .
.. .�„ ; . . . � . . . � .. . . � . . .. . , � .
`�.3',�%n't' ��� . • . � - .. � .. . . . . '. .
...+,,a��, :_
. �
. Sx:...�. ., . .ae.,. .._ . ... _ _ � ,. . � - ..:.-ir.,.:.e,_ •.x:.v��a��a�e.w.r:t.t�i:t�r ^_.[fi� � ,y�yi,•�,
t,_;
:a
( i`
. v�.
� �;,�
t
. i . .i?. it{4,5:;
j future changes in legislation. Staff will discuss this issue in '� ,�"••
more detail at the Board meetin � �
4 CJ• fii�' .a�
F, ... •y y
2) Cabin "C-East": The Housing Office has indicated that this 360 �� �:�:�•
square foot dwelling unit should be deed restricted as a Category "''' .'+
2 Employee Dwelling Unit. If this unit is to be designated as �4;� ,..-��J
mitigation for the limited commercial use of the Lodge, the Code 1-`�: <
[3-1404(E) (1) (b)] requires that the unit be deed restricted to 100 S;�_:. ;:
percent employee housing. The EDU deed restriction does not satisfy ���%'=" '
this provision of the Code. Staff recommends that this unit be deed �•;��'~�=�
restricted to Category 2 Affordable Housing. This unit currently �n�=;e�,:'
houses the caretaker for the E1k Mountain ro ert �
P P Y• k'�:��F:�::;
3) Cabin "C-West": The Applicant oriqinally proposed that this
aabin be deed restricted to Resident Occupied status. Ellen Randall �
currently utilizes this dwelling as her personal residence. Under k�w
the Housing Office interpretation of Ro, a non-resident owner '
cannot occupy this deed restricted unit. The unit must be rented :��'
' to a permanent resident. Staff recommends that this cabin be deed �•
restricted as a Caretaker Dwelling Unit. The Applicant has
• represented that this cabin can be reduced to 700 square feet in a��
size by walling off the existing loft area. �
4) Cabin '�D": This unit is being pro osed as the � '��
p principa]. dwelling
unit on the property. Ellen Randall's son, David Middleton, has
_ used this cabin as his residence, and upon completion of martial '
arts training in Japan, will return to live in this unit. This �
structure currently contains two livable units. Ms. Randall and Mr.
Middleton have indicated that they are willing to remove the '�,,
kitchen of the lower unit and eventually connect the two levels by �'+�
the construction of a interior staircase. Staff notes that this � �
should be a condition of this approval.
5) Historic Cabias (2)"E":
Cabin ^E°- west has been substantially i.mproved, as described �;�
previously. However, the Historic Preservation Officer has
indicated that this unit may be designated as an historic ,r
structure. The AppZicant has not provided evidence of the age of �
�. the two structures as of this writing. Staff has taken photographs ±
--'"- of the structures and has requested additional information of the i,
Applicant. Any submitted documentation will be reviewed by the
Historic Preservation Officer. ��'
,`.' Section 3-806 (C) states: "An additional dwelling may be allowed �
on a parcel which contains an Historic Dwelling, subject to special ' � '
' review.., provided that one of the structures is known to be
i historic, Expansions to the historic structure shall be reviewed
within the context af historic preservation..." This code section :��
' will allow the property to contain two residences free of deed �
� restrictians (Cakain "D" and Cabin "E"-west). Staff would point out �. �;":,,
that the original intent of this provision was to allow one _,. :zY:�;
( -�
4 f
�
,�� i
�.!:: ..
� - - ---�'�Y..t�----._' r--_....__ .._..K. r..,�-.. --�- -- �-----^..r_.�..w::x:.u..r��.` �.�hF} >.
_�_.T ' . ��'1 .y�.
• . _ r � ,
I �� ;
�
i _ �' ' C'
s . : .�-'.
. _ _ ; •
` � � , .
: <., ,_ . . � r ' . .
�; • '
`��°•''� . _ . •
;�,.y?�
�:";•'.�» . . . . . . _.. , .._ . .... ... . .. ^ .
� _:_ . ....-'.'�– -- ..,�.
,,;,.. y;.,
' ;r•Y�'�.I..
� P`
�
i
y{E
f q'11•�. y:
.. � additional unit an a property. Wteether or how this provision ''�,.: ; -
applies to a property which already includes multiple structures
is a policy decision. Staff is seeking direction from the Board on �-;�
this matter. j;,.�;�'
, ��
Cabin "E"- east does not contain a kitcHen, alfihough the cabin does �,! .'��:,•
i.'''.�..
have bathroom. This cabin can be aonsidered as a structure which '
is accessory to the principal historic structure (Cahin "E^-W05t) -,''s,
and, consequently, preserved as an historic resource. The Code does r
,:
- � not limit the number of accessory structures that can be allowed -
on a property. ,
-- . '.) � ,,K, •.•
NOTE: The Housing office points out that all of the proposed deed -r�°
restrictions will be re-evaluated should more or different 'y``
+�<.�:.
development be proposed for the property in the future.
;
'7) Lodge: The Applicant is proposing to utilize apprpximately 6,000 9 '
i square feet of the main floor of this structure for limited �.
` commercial uses associated with permitted outdoor recreational
: � activities. The outdoor recreational uses discussed so far include: �'
_ I � fishing, hiking, skating and cross-country skiing. The Applicant } '
also su ests that the structurA can accommodate rou �
i 99 g p gatherings !
and catered events, such as weddings, receptions, conferences, etc.
The use of mass transportation (shuttles) to transport event guests �t
� was intitially proposed by the Applicant to limit increased
vehicular traffic on Castle Creek Road and reduce the need for �
additional parking. The Planning and Zoning Commission and the
� � County Engineer feeZ that enforcing the use of shuttZes for events
� would prove difficult. As a result, the P&Z recommends that the
i number of vehicles allowed on the subject property be limited to �;�
a total of 35. The P&Z prohibited parking on Castle Creek Road and '�
\ � the use of the American Lake Trailhead parking area by the Elk
'.,) Mountain Lodge.
The Applicant will come to the meeting prepared to more clearly
define the "limited commercial uses". The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends that the number of events by limited to 52
per year, with no limitations as to when these events can be held.
3PECIAL REVIEw: Staff will review this proposal for consistency
'�:.'— with the Special Review criteria of Section 3-20.
_ : �
A. The special raview use must be consistent with: �,
-- 2. The applicable County Master Plans; i -
Staff res onse: There are no a licable master � !
P pp plans foz this'
I portion of the County.
� 2. Caunty Land Use Policies in Artic2e 2; fI
� �
� �.
� Section 2-6: Compatibility with existing adjacent neighborhoods T
i
i �:i
I 5 � _
�:� �
� ��
��
I i:1 i i'�,
�r;f.i
�- 1 ,�wo�n-�^- ,.;�,,,,...�._.- /.�� ......«. . - - - . . . '�
",,,�-:as,Z��� r 5
I 1 r
. /� �. .. � - " � ' � . �yy�1
_ , . , _ . . . _ . . . '� . . ...�' 4
� � . _ � - .. . �i i
. �a . � � . � . . t' '
, . .. — . � . . . . �� . ' - . �`� ` y
'� ���- � � � - .. . • '� :: . ., ' . . ., . t,�.�,�..
. . � � � � � . . . � . . �
. .:,.. '.._,. � � � . ��.. - ... �..�. rY. ' -� � � �':..�-'
1 � , .. .. . � . . ' `., . . .. .. . .
\ 1 �,. - _ .
._ . � , .
, .. .
�. � _' ___- -- -'-- .,;_�. :.
�: _ .. .
�.��� _ .. .
,F - . ,
'�
^
Y;. , ,
.., .nuli-.:i:«. . Y 5 'if C� \� r ��� i�`.
�'�.�.. . . ..;�fila.'� . �,:� �rt.- . . . ,. 1Y'. ±��...._ 5.��n,•.e!'.v3$bifiw�af5,�`' cr4�-��i��� ��'�.V �i:�r� r k:1.
_ : .�.... . ..
_. k
�i
I -�'
. { . � ,��•, ,:5�;
",`��„ �"'�'�
��.
. ,� 1�� 't•y� ..
{ Staff response: The Maroon/Castle Caucus expressed concern with � � ,��
� respect to the Tack of a clear definition of the proposed limited �,.,-._
commercial use of the Elk Mountain Lodge property. The Caucus is 'i• .-i
� concerned over the potential for the expansion of the commercial '
uses of this property in the future. They also pointed out that the i,
proposal for the use of mass transportation is often abandoned when �,; '
usage does not justify the continued expense of such service. �_,�_ ...'•'
�,�-:,,
Bruce Mace, a long time Castle Creek Valley resident, echoed the ;��:�.�.-:;
-- concerns over the lack of definition of the proposed commercial '�'" `
_ ��..,..; .
_.._ :.>;;.
use. Bruce stressed to Staff the delicate nature of the upper ,::'_�,,;-,`
Castle Creek Valley and the potential effects that a large `:
commercial use could have on the valley. ':, 4�'.
Staff shares the concerns of the Caucus and neighbors with respect �¢
to the lack a clear statement of the parameters of the "limited �� :
- commercial use". Also, Staff sees no clear relationship between -;; ;
"outdoor recreational uses" and events such as weddings, receptions �-
� and conferences. ;�1
- 3. The inteat of the Zone District in which the proposal is f
located; and j4�
AFR-10 is "intended to maintain the rural character of
- lands proximate to development centers and state Highways �,
by preserving agricultural operations, wildlife habitat,
� and scenic quality while permitting low density, single �.
family dwelling units and customary accessory uses."
.:�
Staff response: Section 3-409(c) (6) identifies limited commercial
i use as a use allowed by speciaT review,. provided they are somehow
. connected to Outdoor Recreational IIses. As mentioned previously,
uses such as hikinq, fishing, skating and cross-country skiing are
clearly outdoor recreational uses. Staff does not support the �'`-s�
- argument that wedding receptions and conferences are accessory to
these uses. -
Staff recommends that the number of events and the number of guests ,�
°� � allowed be strictly limited, so as to allow for only those uses '.
_._•-- ;
that can be reasonably considered to be associated with outdoor �'
recreational uses.
4. The character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel ;, ,
. propoaed for developmeat and surroundinq land uses, or ,• ,
enhance the mixture of complimentary uses and activities '
in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for � -
development.
_�. .
- Staff response: The Elk Mountain Lodge property has had a long ��:
history of use as a tourist accommodation facility and has been ',�;; :;�_t
used on several occasions for relatively large group gatherings. �'• '-
� 6 �.
;
�i,�
� tl
I
' — ..--�.�..,�,�.:,.�.....w�,.�wn�
�� y,_._. ... _ . . .,,.,;..wa.>�,,�,,,,--_j ' .......�:...: �.�...�.------ . .� . a: �..,.,�i�=z�„..,v_.3r.:..-:i,:t��s- �A
i
, ` � �., .. -� .. . � � n .
i
. , �J
/�' . . -. . . . • . . . . K�.
• . ' . .. . .. . . . � . ' .tI:-'r . J
� � ... / ' . . . � . _ �.. � �
.. , . . . . . ..
(!
' , . � � ..-...� . .. ..... ' . . . :�., , .�f:.'. ..� .. . .,.
I . . . . - . � :�.�i�.: . � . . '
. \ �. ' - . � . . � � � ' . . . . ' . . . .,. . .. �
� . . . ' . - � . - . . . . . . . . . �� . I � . .
..� �.� � - �. ���� —..� .. - ,-�,...-._ .�.- :..i i:._.�. .. . . ..: . . . .� . .. � .. .
�7q^; _ . • `
r��1.'� � . .
:,�.
�'�r.� �
_ .
�- ' ' .�.,.� �.� �.,�.�
-+ �:�.,.. .�w...,..,;...:::.. _ ,.,. _ . ,.. _. .c.:..nc.�.-,.,.6�,:� » ... ��u.,�. .,�.L.Lt.;,ctr�w=3"S,:G^ r-��,.�;;
, . .�_ . . .. ... -. .. ...... . . � . . .� t�.:a41r:-, .
� - a.
� }�:
vs
j � ;r,�.:: ;y,:
,,;�„� :�;;
� Consequently, the proposed limited commercial use does not '��. ,'`
necessarily con£lict with historic use of the property, yet �L=�'`=
� commexcial activity is not necessazily consistent with the r'�:;•,'��
I character and surrounding land uses in the immediate vicinity. The :�,s•�,,:•.�
Pine Creek Cookhouse, located approximate2y 3 miles up-valley from 'r •��:�s
� the Elk Mountain property, is the only significant commercial �°�� '`
s-�'-
� activity in the upper Castle Creek Valley � S `s•
�,
H. The location, §ize, desiqa and oparatinq characteristics of :{,�.,.... �
_____ '._I tbe proposed �pecial review use must be in harmony with the L
� surroundinq area and miaimizes adverse affects, including '� '� -.
visuai impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular �' i.,.,,_
eirculatioa, parkiaq, trash, service " delivery, noise,
i vibrations aad odor on surrounding properties.
Staff response: There may be visual, pedestrian and vehicular, :-;:`
' circulation, service delivery and noise impacts associated with . �.
• the commercial use of the Elk Mountain Lodge property. The lack of .�` {
a clear definition as to the scope and duration of commercial `
• events held at the Lodge make it difficult to assess the extent of
, the impacts generated by such uses. •,��
t 0. There must be adequate public facilities and services to serve ,� ��
tha special review use including bu�t not limited to roads,
_ potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire
protection, emerqency medical services, hospital aad medical +�
services, 8rainage systems, drainage systems, and schoo2s. 3
Staff response: The Castle Maroon/Highway 82 intersection has been �•-
documented to be currently over capacity. Additional vehicle trips '';j��
' will be associated with the proposed commercial operation of the
� Lodge. Staff wi11 recommend that the Applicant contribute to
' intersection improvements on a pro rata share,hasis, pursuant to
Land [7se Code Section 3-1107 (F) . This issue was not discussed at
the P&Z meeting. t�,
The relatively remo�e location of the Elk Mountain Lodge will limit '�
the availability of some facilities and services. Although the
,;� Property is somewhat self-sufficient, emergency services are a,
- -- sometimes unavailable to this area, due to frequent avalanches and
the closure of Castle Creek Road for extended periods of time. �'
The Environmental Health Department will raquire that the Applicant �
, - provide dacumentation of adequate quantity and quality of water
supply and adequate sewage treatment capacities for the proposed ��..• , '
uses on the property. The EHD also will require a•
fireplace/woodstove permit, if any are proposed.
D. An application for a special review use must demoastrate that �,
the propos.ed developmeat Will aot:
1. Materially endanger the public health, safety or welfare; ' ' ��=%
�Y � i
� 7
_:_._. , .,_
. . . . . ....... _.ru.w+n--�'—..� ...--���.+—ra...:� ..._��.u....r.,�--- _-_- . .f�Lt�Yt�
. . � - - . . . . . .. "�*��'_�4'.,I
% • �'.f� t
. .
n,
, _ \ �. . .
_ � � - i' :
� ..l ` -
y
. ��
..._�.
\ ; • . _ :, ,;.�� . ,
� ,
. . .
;. : � .
_ �_:� _„'_ ,__ :_ ..: . . . �.
-� -� - .
�; �
.��E'u"F . . . - . . . . .. . -
���
,�;:
z,� � .. :. ,_.
. .�. .. ..__ . , .. _ _. _. .. -: _ ... .
.. . . ... ��.�r, ��„+�k�,,,
r.3�... ?�%,..�.
�:,�,
` �:.
i 3:f
� �;
� aAd ,.:�,�^��.'� :
� 2. Substaatially injure the value of adjoining or abutting i;.:r�.��; ,
property• ; x =
K•:....x�
i� # .��..�:::.-.
Staff response: Staff does not feel that a limited commercial use f'�•_.:i ,
will materially endanger the public health, safety, or welfare, nor � ,:`:� ., `,
i will it substantially injure the value of adjoining property. +'< -
� ) ;
� Staff 8oes feel that commerciaZ use of this faciZity must be y 'S
": limited so as not to substantially injure the character and long- #
____ ; term health of the fragile alpine ecosystem in which the Elk : ,r, -
I Mountain Lodge property resides. '�S �
r
I . '��� :
OTSSR ISBIIES: At the March 7, 1995 meeting, the P&Z asked the �
i Applicant to execute a fisherman's easement for access to Castle �
Creek. The Applicant expressed reluctance in the granting of such � �,i;�r� ,
t an easement, yet the P&Z added a condition that would require the ��;�,"
"�, i Applicant to execute a fishermans easement agreement to allow for +'�Yi
public access to Castle Creek, subject to an assessment by the �-�
Division of Wildlife as to the feasiblity and scope of such an `�r
• easement. Aftez the meeting, Staff discovered that a "fisherperson �;y;? ,
access" agreement had been recorded in the "Restrictive Covenants !"'�
and Dedications for the Elk Mountain Lodge'� by a previous owner in F`
1987 (attached). This agreement is expressly conditioned upon the
County providing adequate insurance against any loss or damage ? ;��
- occasioned by puhlic use of said access. Staff suggests that there
is a valid fisherman's access agreement in place on the subject -t
property and the condition recommended by the P&2 has been removed.
SII2�4IARY: Staff recommends that the residential units on the Elk �'�
Mountain Lodge praperty be classified as outlined in the Staff �,�A'�
j Comments section of this memorandum. �
�
With regards to the limited commercial use of the Elk Mountain
Lodge structure, Staff recommends that the commercial uses be
limited to thase uses that can be directly associated with a � `?�
outdoor recreational use. Staff feels that a limited commercial use �•
of the Lodge may be justified, provided the resultant impacts are
minimized.
A ;
Section 3-20 of the Land Use Code requires that the Applicant
annually submit a statement which demonstrates the continued
conformance of the use to the conditions of the special use permit
to the Communzty Development Director. If, after reviewing the '�
statement, inspecting the site and considering any other relevant ,
materials, the Director determines that the use is not in , � .
conformance with the provisions of the Special Use Permit, the '
Community Development Director shall recommend to the Board that
� it consider withdrawal of such permit, pursuant to a duly noticed ��`
I public hearing. If the Lodge structure is completed and used as a '1�
lodge, the approvals on all of the residential structures, as ��
described in the body of this memo, must be re-evaluated. It may � �
,.1 8 � 'i '
i
i �y� `
I �`
�.
��- ..�•- _._'_ __ ._„_.,..,.,�.-�—. _ ..�.,�..-,w...--- . ' ... _.._'_,..._..-,�.,.. . . . � ��
. . . �� � . . . .. , . •-.,..... ..�,.��, � �.�_ F-.�
3'�
�':, �r
. . . . . . { .,.
' � } w:
_ .. � .
�, \
, • _ ,�,,
. . . . .�.: ' - . . ... .
.f _ � . - ��� �� . .. ' . . . ' _ .
.�1 ��� .. . � . , . . . . . . I . � . . . . � . . . . .
.. . ., � . ...' . ' . . .'- . , . . . , . . . ! .
' - � ". -. _ � . ....f. . ' . . � � ' . . . .
..: .
�: �� . . . � .. . � . . . . ' � . . .. . . . . _.. � � � . ; .
'a;a.�� . " ' . . . " . . . .
Sr`� �
. � ,_ ._ . . . . ._...-- ----------..:. -a•��,<<,.��:�;,.
yar,f�` .w6y�.,
}
. �
'#.
. .�,.�'..`�5��
�� be that those units will have to be fully deed restricted to _7';��-�::
` satisfy employee generation mitigation. -{T•;. �;, .,
y"r.;.�'J
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the Board of .
,�;'t''
County Commissioners approve the Elk Mountain Lodge Special Review ,,; :, �i,,
Use Permit for a period of 5 years, subject to the following �;: c :�:.��
<-
conditions: �`"'' s,
i,: :;;:� ��; .
1. The Applicant annually submit a statement which demonstrates �-�a '
; the continued conformance of the use to the conditions of the �`�... .
Special Use PermiC to the Community Development Director. If, a*+,r.� �
- after reviewing the statement, inspecting the site and � .,'�
- considering any other relevant materials, the Director +�� ,°� .
determines that the use is not in conformance with the + }°r-` `
provisions of the Special Use Permit, the Community ��
Devalopment Director shall recommend tio the Board that it � :� .
consider withdrawal of such permit, pursuant to a duly noticed �'�, '?
ublic hearin The statement shall be annually submitted to $��
the Planninq gOffice 45 days prior to the anniversary of � !�t*-. �� `
approval by the Board of County Commissioners. f -
;���;,.
2. Any significant change to the operations shall require an � r
amendment to this Special Review Use Permit, shall constitute ��� '4;
a new application, and shall require a repetition of the
procedures described in Section 3-20 of the Code. Minor iC
changes to the use may be authorized by the Planning Director ; t'
without additional public review [Section 3-20(E) (2)J•
� 3. The appropriate deed restrictions shall be filed with the � .
Housing Office for Cabins A, C-east, and C-west within 60 days ; y•�`�'�
of Board approval, as follows: � �?
i
1) Cabin A shall be deed restricted to Resident Occupied
(RO) status.
; .I '�q.
2) Cabin C-east shall be deed resticted as a Category 2 ;
Affordable Housing Unit. ; i�
3) Cabin C-west shall be deed restricted as a Caretaker .r
Dwelling Unit. ;
.� 4. The Applicant shall request that the Chief Building Official ,�
inspect the Lodge Structure, Cabin "C"-west, Cabin "C"-east,
Cabin"D", Cabin "E"-west, and Cabin "E"-east for compliance j
with the Uniform Building Code within 30 days of Board of • �
County Commissioners approval. ' � '
5. The Applicant shall complete any structural or safety ;f�;
' improvements to the lodge structure required by the Chief y��
Building Official, prior to the issuance of a certificate of ` �:
occupancy for the Lodge structure. � �y} ,_;-�.
�
-. �. '`"'=�
9 � �
x .
; �S,�
°�, I
'�ts1
_ ! � ;.'
. __ _ - _w,�..-._.��— --------�-----�+;�;;�,�. •'��+,t f , .
� �� ��a�`t
t �i',.
!
. . / . '�� .. � i �
. . :_. '. ; . '�� " ,�. . ��'}
- �. , ''� � .� . � � � % �. .:. ' � �'.
♦
.. � . ^ �. . �; .' _ . . . .. � ...
. . . -'"" . . ,- � .. ....
_ ., . . . . ....: .� . . 1,• + , -.,. . " .� 4,:`:.' ..
�. . '` : � � , � .r" r. � .
� .. _ 'i;tv . . .. � . �.
.� 'I . .. � � . - •i�� :�. . . '
..` .� �.; " .. ' .''. ' . , _- � ' � - ... . � '.- � � � . '! �
' .. . .. . . . . � ' ,
. ... . . . .. ..� .��--v . "' . . .� ...--� � � , �
. ��. .. .- . ., "� : . . .. . � � � . � . . � . .. . . .
� �� �.4���w � . . . . . . � ' . . - ,
�-�..
��.
. � -
� ' - . , �
��-t; � ,��-•,
. ��;.:, �y
- �
' -:�
9
i •�•-
,�.� . ` �`�. .�ti.!.
� 6. The Applicant must submit well water quality test results from ' �'
i��` '. �:
an approved laboratory to the Environmental Health Department, .•�
prior to issuance of a certificate of occuQancy for the Lodge i ��?` �'• `
structure. � ' �y
7. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the + �/ t '
I ..,c• .
Lodqe, the Applicant shall submit documentation to the � i<=�' ,
Environmental Health Department to determine if the existinq ��� ?
� sewage disposal systems have adequate capacity for the i !'
proposed uses, If expanded septic systems are required, the I {,.,?
_ Applicant shall obtain the necessary septic permit from the `' ;`
�-- EHD and construct the improvements to the systems, prior to ��� '
the issuance of a Certificate of occupancy for the Lodge. ��;F.�..:,;�
� 44 .:
8. The Applicant shall submit a fireplace/woodstove permit, if � �
any additional fisctures are planned, to the Environmental ��`
Health Department, prior to the issuance of a certificate of ,��!i`�'
_ occupancy Por the Lodge structure. �ij
9. The Applicant shall remove the kitchen of the lower dwelling �'�' ��
� unit in Cabin "D", prior to inspection by the Building �
Department. } '°�
I..
l �
10. Not more than 35 vehicles shall be allowed to park on the Elk �� •.;'!s
Mountain Lodge property at any time. Violation of this �
provision will constitute a violation of the Special Use �
Permit and shall be grounds for the revocation of said permit. �
d
� 11. Parking on Castle Creek Road right-of-way shall be prohibited. �
� The American Lake trailhead parking area shall not be utilized �•%
by residents or guests of the Elk Mountain Lodge property. ±ii;'�
; I
� 12. The Applicant shall provide dacumentation or other reasonable '
evidence of the approximate age and past use of Cabin E"-east r
and Cabin "E"-west to the Historic Preservation Officer for
a determination on the historic value of said cabins, prior � +�t'
to the issuance of a certiPicate of occupancy for the Lodge
structure.
.,�. _ 13. There shall be no overnight lodging or camping permitted for �."
- - any event on the Elk Mountain Lodge property.
�
14. Commercial snowmobile and motorcycle operations are prohibited
on the Elk Mountain Lodge property. 1
� 15. The number of commercial events allowed, pursuant to this� ,� , �
Special Review Use Permit, shall be limited to 52 per year. !
16. The Applicant shall submit a road improvements plan to the `�:
County Engineer for approvai. The Applicant shall pay a pro ��
rata share of the improvements to Maroon Castle/Hiqhway 82 ,.'�
intersection, prior to the issuance of a Certificate oP i<="�.
�.,.
4,._-
�� 30 �
Ci
���
V s�` .
t°..
. � .v��--.-..----^-- -'---^-�-°�,c..:,c..:�s.a,a::.,.._.-....� ------^-- . . -- �� �
:
� � �����
�`, ;� - � ,
�� ,:
� �'::,i a
' � �', ,
.
� �.
, .� -
; _ . �, - . :
. .. \ 1 . � . ' . . . - . . . . ' '. . . . _ . , �. . ' . ' � .
� 1 ' � . ' . � . . . . . . . . .
. � .. . .. . . .. - . . ' . ' ' . � , , ,
. .. , . _�.� y. .." �.. � . . ..• ,
. . .. �� . ... .
-�.: .. • � � . . ' ... . . . .. .. � , � .
t��'x,.,'C • " .
,.,f.. " .
_i•,�'
_ ���� _ _ �,�w�,...�,�..�....
'��� _ ' �__..... ._.._
, .
_..,. � � „����,,� • , , �;
�av.y_�.�a�.:,.,_.__ � „ .,..u, ...�,
. ,... _ . ,.
, �J...�._.'1'._.... . ......_.._._�..r.�_.�..�._.�_�'._'.. ..._
,� . .... _.��. .. _....�ar_ .����.�..�.. _�._. . . . . . . . . � _ k
, . . . . . � . - � � � . � . ' �. �3 :. .
- _ . . . . . . . . . i..� '
.i� �� - . � � .� �'
Occupancy for the Lodge structure. ,�� _y�
17. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations �' r�"'�
made in the application and in the public meetings, unless F;r y
otherwise amended by other conditions. ;4 ,: "
. .. . . ,c�;c�.:�-�.
��
ATTACffiRENTe: �h�' 4�
1. Housi.ng Office memo ��� t %r
2. Zoning Office memo �
,�
3. Environmental Health Dept.comments �� ;;x,. �
4. Maroon/Castle Caucus letters . �� '
5. photos of historic cabins
��
6. Fisherpersons easement � t
7. . site map ,'z -'
aemo elk.mtn sr_bocc
- — .°?�. !'.
t _;-
- . � .'�!' �
.. �'
�;
r..
� F
,a}
_ �
I �
'� `� �t
h
. ,.
t
.. :: _ ,
, _ ,
;:
<, ;
. _.: ,. ' .�.
t - ,
�_.
�
•,.�;
� _M..`
... I ..' I ��; .
� �'
:�� � ' �� 11 . �' � . . .
! �f
_. . � c� +�`�
}r� � {�,1� �
� .. . � ...� � ��.
. . . � _ [,��. i
r
1 ��
'� � rr �..: 3 _� +r
t '-} T'h�'�!"r��} X .i { �' �' < w' t l J T� � Z'"� •
:i\ / )�4 I �. 'r �`�'�;.L�YY ��f � �.� � f ' '�Al3.�
�j �.r'I
,,�Y�t{��`"d �s�+r�N}�;�� y z F� �+` :i i �[ 1' ��f T f Sr
� � y fl`�,� �; 4.r 1 t � ? r` �r i i : �' � �� x� �3�
a . .:�`Y'� � � ilri �w� x �� � , .f �; � , n
, a ���� r3��rr � r � � - r �.� �? . _
{ W� 4 j f, ;�
i R���''4�' .vi"�,��'! }� � k Z -. ..�� '�`
�BL ri Yt�Ci�''Y "`-� :--+ �y . ti . .'f�,j� ��; i • i -
I �1�f�� � � + � ` r �
��,�� ' I ��� i y��'n"4�x � y .\ � i� �S f K� < � '�r ", �1 I � .
�a-'1�Y .� f f ' � �
����ky 3'F . itl r: R 5 s; t' �
�. .
p� 8 +. }; � � � v +i r . . �+.� s
�� � �1 :, t �l I : '�.�� "
* � ` .
f'� t;: t....., fN�'xn�S ,e }t n4,a�s �,.'. - _
i
. .�.� i?f �'; w�e; - ��'�+xy'�+,'°' - - _ ) .'{•
.� } hh .
.
a
' . � .. .. � . ..
... � _ �1 . . .. . . . .. . .
� _ ' .
. �t�it'•, � '
� „ •
• �'�. •- ' r9�4.:Y.G,:,.. -':�:... .. . ,. ... , ' , __ X
•-�- - • •- -: .... _
� �
MFlP. 03 9S �li�30PM ASF£I�I FI�USIhl6 OF�� P.i ��f'�r a<'�,
t'` F{:
�i:
, '.� � �/p . � y.��6��
' 4,�
: �S�
� 14aMORA�DL1� �{y .�Vxv
t k. '-.:: ..
TO: R.i.ck Magill, Planning Office (s -;. .
- �'�::�'�
- SbeQ�S: Cindy Christensen, Housing Offiee " J `�,
,
� i"��
DATS: March 3, 1995 �s
A�: fiLIt MOUNTAIN IADG� - 'S
Parcel ID No. 2909-T98-0�-0�6 `
'?` .
�:"._'
,"�::.:. :
�86Q8: The anplicant is requesting to us2 thn mafn porY.i�in o£ the `'�-;;
.! '4'.:..;, �-
Elk Mountain Lodge, aporoximately 6,Obo sc;uare feet, for limited ::��.,�
� commeraial uses. �' �
�:,`r::
� 8AC$d&OtrND: Accordfng to Lhe 9ection 3-1302, C, 2, of the Fztkzn �
i County Land Use Code: 9 .
�
. Commerolsi OevelapmeM: An app�lpmt shaY proaide aftd'dable housin9 f�one hundred pzrcenk � �' �
(100%)d the empioyeea to be generated by commercial deMefopriwnt baaed upon ihe standards
' in Fcgure 308.When a range of fidI ttrne eqwlralent empioyoea is ind'ieated.the pre�tise empleYee
generatia�st¢ndard is determtnetl auhng revtew ortl+c develapment appqcat3on alter cmntderaUon �
of a ploposal fmm an appficant �
Figure 3-6r Emnloyee Generation Standards for Commercial Land Use9, �
in the Pitkin Countg Land Uae Codea, eCates the amount of Eull-time �
equivalent employees generated per 2,000 equare feet for specific
conanercial land uses.
;
_ i Also, 9ection 5-1514 of the Pztkin Gounty Land Use Code, whieh �
relates to affordable housing states: �
M appiiwllon shetl idenMy tha rnethod by wMCh an apyicant i�to mSigate impaas on the �
demandiw affordaMe houcing In tne cammuiay�and snati desafbe�o type aru!amamt�housing s
ta be provided. 1n the case oF aPP�tions for conuneraal C,MQS allatmerda,an appileatton shsq E
id�Wy the number af emploYma�t generatfon un�s(EGU)whiah trta app�rant proj¢efs wY1 ne �
genasttd by the da+reioPment pmposaL �
SII�lA,RY� Hecauae the apnliaant is asking for a five-year temporary �
� commereial use approval, with the Pla*+���+g Office to review e*rery �• �
year, tha Hausing Office would agree to mitigatioa oE one employee.
�_ �: Should any changes be fouad in the lodge during thia yeariy �
" inapection (e.g., a kitchen added), mitigation would ]iave to be �
readdreeged.
I
� After further discussion with Perry Harvey, the applicant's �
xepxesentative, the ataff feels that the apalicant aould hava to j ;
mitigate for one smployee. Tha applicant is requesting ta deed • I.;..
- restrict one of the uniCa, C-Saet, as an employee dwelli.ng unit. � ' !
3taff recommends this unit ro be deed restricted to Ca�egory 2• �'
i
� \ivtpz:al\eot a.nic � . . . �.�,
.. � � . � . . ir°':
- T � .. � ��;F
. . . . . . . � . . ��, �
4J+
. . . � . . . . . . . E�(�},
�
. __
' � --�""'�""'.+u.�+.- .----�w- --^4'.,�.w.a=ai.......-....""_.'..'_ '�4+�, t.
�,.. .
\.` _�: "+�-�'. .' . . . ' , , � +��F
t r
'. � . , "., . ... .. +� ' h
y '
pt
t4 ' ,. . � . . \i ' �
�; .. f, . . � . � •.� `
lr
:' ... . � . .,.� . . � . . • . . '.. . � ' . 4_. ..:
� ..� : � - . . . ..r' . � - .
,.. -.: . ' '. , ' .
� ...\ . . �. . . �`.,.,- ..�.., . .. .
5 ., . '. � �:. . ..
. . ... �...��: . .. . . .� . - I. . . . . ��. . .-v -- � . . .
. . �� � (�— . ' . • . . .. . � . ,
. �@: . . . • . . . . . . .. .-_ . . � •
� �y�r 1,�. . . , .. - ' � . � ' � ' � .. . ♦
8�
,4+,' , .
���.��_ .:;....,mw �,..�-.. .... . r.. ..�. - r� � ..�..,.�. . e�_. ....' . .:.&!'�.fi�d:�:,,+.t,ui+A.�iCira�'c�dif����.�i�:+r 1 ���a> '�?�.;r'.:
, . . . ... . . . ..... .._ . _ . .. . -
. . .�_.. ..---�- �— ---. - _. .._. . ... ._.. . __�__..._ . ,�
. -._.— :r �rY'S,:i'.
+ x
a �
'�:
!i
� .f�.. ��'
� � .. .
`;�r:._ ..
MEHORANDIIM ;�T,; �
y, . .��.
" TO: Rick Magill, Planning ,
� ��••,
: j '��s
� FROM: Joanna S. Schaffner, 2oninq Office�� 4 ,,, ,,
DATB: December 28, 1994 �4�xr };
,i �;
AE: Elk Mountain Lodge Special Review �,� s' ''
. Parcel ID�` 2909-i94-OU-006 ;.,;;�;-_,i;.;:,
-- -------------_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_^_-_ _�_-_-----_-_---- =-a-=----- .`:t'.
�. � :
I have reviewed the above referenced application and offer the `�'
. '�.,.�. .
following comments. {,.,,:;..:
ZOHS: ARF-10, ten acre minimum 2ot size "�`
'�''
This parcel contains in excess of 50 acres and is conforming in `�'�7
size. � .�F�� �
SETBACxB: The required setbacks for this parcel are: � °',"�
� y;d::
� 100 foot major road setback as measured £rom the �
Mazoon Creek Raad right-of-way 'i. �f
20 foot minimum stream setback •a�`'
100 foot front yard setback � �
50 foot side yard setback ��
50 foot rear yard setback 4
FL008 AREA: BOCC Reso 86-5, approved a maximum of 29,229 gross
square feet. See attached reso for a break down of this total. w;'�'�
„�
P2ease note that Reso 86-5 indicates more existing structures than +i=
are represented in the current application, and this office is not
aware of any demolition occurring on the site.
The following table is represented by the applicant as existing
floor area. �s•
i�.
Cabit� A 2,600 square feet !i .
Cabin C "East" 360 square feet 'k
Cabin C ��West° 820 square feet � '
--��'- Cabin D 1.000 scruare feet ''�
Total Residential Floor Area 4,780 square feet
Cabin E "Historic cabin" is not represented by the applicant but y
is believed to be a residential structure which was converted .
' without permits within the last few years. i . •
. ,- .. +
,.
The Lodge has not been included in floor area calculations but '- ,•�
contains approximately 18,000 square feet. i
: �.
� Please note that the existing cabins appear to have been converted i ?
to residential use without permits. ��
ti
� f . . I�;-:
It does nat appear that the swn of all structures on the site j •. I
; contain more than 29,229 square feet of floor area. � � '
�L i.
a:5;;� ;
�+�. �'`�
i1 '
— - - r-----�---____�– - .....�,�.._--_,�":� ��'�
� ��C ,
.�� -. .. � • � � . � �4,�... i.
. . . . . . .- • .` . ..
. . � � . . . � . . � ��
t
1 ''� � � �� _ -
,` � ���s .. • � ' . .J�. � . . .. 5
. . . ' ` .. � . . � ;-� -. . . .. . ' ..
l � '�
, _ ' . . ' ,_ . .. ., _ , .
, .�.� ; � _ , ,
�i`�`� ; .
,,�. ... �
:�
h
' _ .:..<ac:..�ss'..�,,�,. �y,..� nggt'�',c3�'.l
��,"lq .. . . . ... ..�.. -... .._. . vnw rrmi�nEr ?•r!a?�ii41{s;i4/11'• i ,.
� . .. .... ........ -...._._.., . . ��.
,. . . ......_. ... �
�� �
. �- � � . � . . .� .. `i-
II88: St appears that the applicant is proposing two separate uses ;�. :
for the Lodqe. The first is a "Club house or recreational building .,;�j
. used in connection with and accessory to a permitted outdoor
-- recreational use". The lodge is not an accessory structure. The �'.,�z_,
-- applicant states that the upper valley offers many recreational
activities, but does not explain how any of these uses are related `,!.
to the proposed °club house". Since there is no nexus between the e
club house and the recreational activities, it does not seem like �a :.
an appropriate review. The applicant further states that it will
be used for group activities only. Does the County wish to .` r`
-= encourage commercial group use of recreational activities in the '� �
upper valley? ,'��.`•
Secondly, the applicant proposes usinq the lodge for private *'�
parties. Private parties is not an appropriate use to be included
under "Club house or �ecreational building used in connection with
and accessory to a permitted outdoor recreational use". Again,
this does not appear to be the appropriate review for this ' �"'
application.
OTHER: The zoning office has received complaints that the site
�- has been posted with NO FISHING and NO TRESPASSING signs along
Castle Creek. Previous approvals required that a fishing easement
be dedicated to the county, but no easement agreement has been
found.
-l� _
_ _ } .
� .
�, ' �
_.,
�
, i
— `�:�I
- : ' ' ' �
. ,�', �''
, i �
�i � R�� ��,�
! I'1 -
: � � . � . � ,�1..
� . .� . �..� : � �. � � � - � i V.
� a
�., �'/ } ( X}��yi.
.�:;` / - , .t(�������\
� �s f �/ ;� C1'
� �n t " s C7
\� r�'�'��"� • _ � �
r , '. y
� y1. �,c . � 1 ♦ 'r'j, < /
. '�` t- <.r t+" .
� p�'F! '� 5 ?r } � .'' ' .
.`''� S " !,.
� �.�.:_r �...
�t J t I.
�� _ I
_ �, 1� � "' - �L^t-ev' _ } ` • _.
�� � .
� . .�� . . . . . � :. . � . . � . . .. . - .. -
� . •
.,�.
:�;a. ' � . :... - __..____..--�.._.._.:.....-°;-yr;;��;:�;.,
:j - t�
;�- � . . � ,�:
" � � � �. .�it{i
,�
. MEMORANDUM ��i ti.
. �.�,��
- � � � . • i',;:z,�
� To: Rick Magill, Planning Office
..i . .
� From: Chris Chiola, Environmental Health Department AseE�.PrrKrv • 'r'
..I . , EYVIRONMEYTAI HEALtH DEPART,IEVT
_ Through: Lee Cassin, Senior Environmental Heafth Officer v;�. .'
,;fi
� I Date: .December 12, 1994 � �'" �
t ,
Re: Elk Mountain Lodge Speciai Review "
Parcel ID # 2909-19400-006 �:�`
_______________________________________________ `1
, :�..,
� � The Aspen/Pitkin Environmerrtal Health Department has reviewed the details of the•Elk i�. �.
� . Mountain Lodge Speciai Review application under the authority of the Pitkin Countv �
- - Code. Title II, and has the following comments. � . � � �
ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-6 and 5-205: •n tis ua Pou�.
� � of tha Coumy to enaure thM lend b not committed to any use end that no use ia fnidated wNhout adequate evidenee that a water
� . � wppty of adequete quelily,queMity,presaure end dependabilAy is aveilable W support Ufe usa(ntanded.' • . _
� 1'hThis Department requires information on the quantity and quality of water availabfe to ,.
the development. Information supplied to this Department from previous applications ' �
of the Elk Mountain Lodge indicates that there is an adequate water supply available.
This water must be tested for its drinking quality. �
A condition of approval for this application is that before arry building permits are
• issued and before the Lodge opens to the public that the wells used for drinking ' j
purposes be tested by an approved laboratory. � , , '
.� SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-7 and 5-200: •n�s,na Por�y or ua • �
- ------ CouMy to eneure thef land ia not eommitted to arry use and thet no we b Initleted wRhout adequete evidenee 1het�fselltdea to ' �;
�-� eollect,treet and dispoae of aMbipated types and quentitles of weste water are avdleble or can and will be provided with sui[able �
. .� - eepaoily,qualiry d diseharge,suitable poiM of discharge and tlependabilily.' ' � 'j '
Lots in the Castle Creek area are served by individuat sewage disposal systems(ISDS).
All such systems installed within Pitkin County require septic permits issued by the • , � ` �',
Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department,and must comply with Pitkin County Tdle ; _
X Sewaae Reaulations. •
' The Elk Mountain Lodge property is currently served by individual sewage disposal .
systems previously installed under permits issued �by the Environmental Health ,.� ;�:;:,
Department. �To determine the waste flow of the project, the applicant must provide � '
_ . ' ' � ,';� I.
- . . , .�
E
. , ,I I;
� I3O SUIIN GA�E\.i SflEFi � aSfE\.COLUGW S16II . PHO\E iO3.9?OJJ:O. Fea iO3.9?O.i19i . , '`.'!.�'�� �
. _ . .. � _ _-_-�- �--- ----- �
. . , . � ......__.-...._.__—_ .___._._.._.,- ,.._._._ _..... .--..,w.
. � . . � ' �... - � . � � . . .-. . -. ��i��
� , � • ` �. .:.. ,,.
' � ' .
� , ,' - . f�;�
�. , � � �,
• _ ,,,-�. �
:;+ ..
\ ` • . ,
� ..
' r .
- � � - � � � � '�� � : �_�.."�_ . �-�:.r'__� . �-_�� -:,� - . �' .'�� .. .. �_ _.
.�: . . � . . . . . .. . . • . . - .
'��,y g�''! . ... . � . . � , . . .
.�.
�2
_._ ' . ,
;�. ._� ._ .. , ��.�- �-
. . .... .. .., s - .:.crl!`�.-�.1.+r.'.....:...����.^.«'lSi.ae3l.�+a11Y4..i..3��5L.` :L'af l�f�a':.
'.I: ��
. � �;
1 �' i.
s , �., ��;
, Etk Mourrtain Lodge Speciai Review , 2
. :.� :
' December 12,,1994 ;`�.`"•
.•,,'��
� detailed information as to the uses of the Lodge. More spec'rf'ically, this Department �`,-'.y�:i.,
- needs to know how many people may possibly use the lodge and far what specific ;�::,,':
purposes and to what extent the kitchen will be used. This inforrriation is needed to ��'�-
determine that the currerits sewage systems will be able to handle the flows generated • �.��:`:�_•� r
by the proposed uses of the Ladge. '`:.��- ''
�.��
_ If any changes or upgrades to the sewage disposai system are necessary, then an ; ,�.J.,
J� application for a septic permit must be submitted to this Department. : �''4 �
A condition of approval for this appliqtion is a review of the uses of the Lodge must ,
be done io determine i�the currerrt sewage disposal systems are adequate. ```�'`
� : �
WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Sections 2-22 and 5-107.2: •R ie Iha poliey of the CouMy to presave `�
� � and proMU Ils preaerH wMer rcsoureas. To tMe and k b the policy of the CouMy thd no land use be(nitiated whkh would ���
� � adverosly a}fect ths quantlty,queliy,or eccesslblllty o}the County a water rewurces;or whfch would ocwr at the expenaa of � ,�: "
, . . esteb0ahed watar-depandent agricultursl activities;or whlch would re�ult in inereased sellniza8on ot water reaources,loss ot
. minlmum atream tlowe,further destruction of wild�Ne habitat or major axpend8urec to reacquiro w radistributs mnjor waler
- reeourees. tt ls Wao qa potlry aF tMe CourAy to maintain e neturd vegetaWe buffx along Its eurfaee waters sueh thet the surfaee 1'
� � and groundwefera o}the area are not eneroeched upon by Isnd•uses u othar human activNiae which could ceusa dMe�loratlon . �a��.
� - - of watar quality or fmpair the natural VeatmeM prooessea provided by meadowe and wetlanda' .
_ The Environmental Health Department will be addressing water quality impacts only �
on down stream water qualiry. This application is not expected to impact down stream
water quality. ' :
. �:��
� A condiiion of�approval for this appGcation is-None.
. AIR QUALITY: Sections 2-17 and 5-106: •Only thaCdevelopmeM is p�tmitted whieh wil!not contribute
� � signifroaMy to degradation of eir quslily in Pitkin County.' �
. . . . . . '�•. .
j
This project is not expected to contribute significantly to air quality degradation in Pitkin
County by adding a significant increase in auto tra�c. The application has received •
prior approvals as a lodge and resort area and•may not exceed these approvals.
�-�`—` The applicant must file a fireplace/woodstove permit with the Environmental HeaRh ,"
Department before the building permit will be issued. The iess densely populated parts , ''
' of the counry may have one•wood burning fireplace and one depa�tment certified ` .
� device per building or two department certfied devices. In addkion, unlimited numbers ,-• .
of decorative gas appliances are allowed. Coal may not be burned in any device. � '�
Bams and agricultural buildings may not install any type of firep{ace device.
. r�.
• Remodeling that affects the firebox of any fireplace will necessitate that the device meet . _
current regu{ations. � >�:, .�;�,:
.. �. � -_
:,
A condition of approval for this application is the receipt and approval of 1he !'
� ��
. �t�t�
,,.._ _ _ ...,�..._..._--_-�-..,.._..,...,�,,..w.. - - -- .., _.._..... �C � .
/ __.�._..�` ��` } ;'.
' , _ . ��� t t
... , .
.: . ` .,
�,
_..
�:.. '
`1 � :
,•,.;;.: � .
� ..-.. , ::. � .� �� - - � � . . - . � . ..� . I_- .. �'_.. .. � �. . . . . . �.- � �� . .
� ; .
� .
• -- -� :! _ . .
�: � : - � .
. ,��� . _ .
�-�
� ,�. .,. .� . � � i � , .�,m�vr.,n a-=i3 �eve y ��;
.,.:. - - . ,:,avlfiiaee�N.'"�a.�..uwl.e� '
�ZS.y. ..._.._.._.. . � .. . .. , ,.._.... .:. , .. . _._..,.aa.._..� . "�r,,r+ v�a
. ..... .. . .. .. . .. ....... . . ._._._. ._ .."�' S
' �.� . . . . � .
� �L
� � T- "�J
.;
� :��.� -
Elk Mountain Lodge Special Review 3 !�,>:,-�.,� -
December 12, 1994 • .=-.,'��
._ firepiace/woodstove permit by the Ernironmental Heaith�Depahmertt ' � i•.
- ;�:;
CONFORMANCE W4TH OTHER ENV{RONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS: Secrion 2-2 m�me >=`�` ' '
� polfay ot the CouMy to eneure ihet no we or dovelopment of Iend is permil[ed whkh la in violadon ot the Iswn of the County, � .;r� - ���
� tfie State d Colorado,or t}+s Unked Stetes of Amariw.' � �
t��:
' If the Lodge's kitchen is to be used to prepare meals for the public,then a food service �i�, ;
—� - license must be obtained and a p{an review must be done. These are done for public ,�`,,�;;•:,
. health reasons. The applicant should contact the Environmentat Heafth Department to •
start the review and licensing process. ��`�:'`�:
- ,�,.
A candition of approval for this application is the submission of a pian review and an �:i'q .
appfir,ation for a food service C�cense to the Environmerrtal Health Departrnerrt before ` ' ..
any builcling permits are issued or prior to being open to the public. , `
:;� .
� This Department is not aware of any issues of concern regarding other environmental �.
health laws. . 'a`'
The fotlowing condi�ons af approvai fram the Ernironmerrtal Heatth Departmer►t tor this `
��
�
application are: i
1.The water to be used for dcinfdng must be tested.by an approved laboratorY• ;,�i�
2 The waste flows irom the proposed uses of the Lodge must be determined and not �, '
� be more than the cuRent septic system is designed for.
_ 3.A fireplace permit be appGed for and approved if arry add�ional fnclures are pianned.
• 4.A plan review and appGcation for a food service Gce�se must he submitted_
�,
i
#; '
_.T OiNMN1Atd0 IISEEl1GMN.SPEC . . � • . . � .
� . . . . . � .' . ... - . : . - 'ti
•-�.�• - . . � . - . . . � . - . ' t:
- � . . ' � � ' .. � � . .. .. . .. . . . . . �.
.. - . .. . . . � �. . � . � . . . . - ' I .
. .... � � , .. . . .. . .. . � � � �. s�' ..
.� ... . � �� . � . � . � .. . � S�JC '�-,,
J
) .� :
� � � -. � . � . ��t. ..
.. . . . . . . � . ' ' � . . . S'.-
� . � .� . . . � - � f',
.. � . - .. �. . . . . . . . . . . ,. t
� I f'.
. . � � . . � � � � ' G� i .
� . � ._ '. '""'. ?'�lt��'y'�
s.--�- . . �41:.��{i '.
. .
� .
- -, �: . � ����
.
.� -�._ �.. - .�; .
.
` ._ • . '
'�.' ,� .. ,.. �.. .. .'..�:' :...-�� .'_ ':...' .� ." . ' .
' , '� .. L. �.�.�•
.'` .. : � ^:...
_ .�..t � �.. . :- ..- . "...' . . -.,. ....' .__ - . :� , .
L
1 � �
- . � - � �r. - `�:.
, y 3 �
. ... ��� f..}!�� . .
�. �'' , . �' � � .
�,.
.
. , , . .
;- . , . ..
_ : .. . , . . � . .
., , . � .,
. . _:. ,.
.. _ — . . ) r: • . . ,>f-Y. ,.__.,
,.. _ -. , -
.. ;_. ._ ._�. ., . ,., • .. ""
� . ` '
`�. �
��r!
. .. - � ' . . _ , � .. . .:.�._.._.___ d1.`e.^'i�Ei;�`.
. . __... ...: . � � .
. ... . ... ...... . . . . . . _...
-. .... . . ..... : ... .
..... qU?,a:',�.:
1
r..
�V V VV/'V � �� '���___.��..� . � . . / � ����
d �XCUIZCG� �ATTORNEYATLAW
.. � . . �'::J
� . PNOFESSIONRI COfiPOMTION �
, � � . . �'i��. '�
108 SOUTH MILL STAEET,ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 - � '� ;1.
(303)925•6150 FAX 925•6751 � - . Q� � , �
r _ 5�/� �;.'�'�.i� •y .
� � . . 7�.�,.'!.'� .
. .. . . i.. � •'+'�'f�
. . . i'�:.G':
����
�.,' S.
December 9, 1994 . � ,� ,:
�f a '
'; Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department � `'-�
_-.; Attn. Rick Maqill '..�� ..�
�-- 130 S. Galena Street � " � '
':i Aspen, Colorado 81611
' .�;
__ �::�,
Re: Elk Mountain Lodge Special Review � ����
I .�1- ' .�.:
; Dear Rick:
� i We reviewed the Elk Mountain Lodqe proposal at our regular � �V�i
� monthly meeting of December 2, 19s4. 4 '
� `.
We offer the following comments: ! '
In general, the application appears relatively innoauous.
However, we feared the agerold problem of inadequate controls on
! the expansion of the use. For example, one of the features of the
r^.
; proposal provides for mass transportation under certain �
� circumstances. It is not uncommon for developers to progose such � �
amenities only to find that the usage doesn't reach trie level to ! •
justify the continued expense, leading to Che abandonment of the
amenity. '
We also felt that the described usaqes were somewhat vague in " �t
_ general. That approach often oreates some anxiety, for the reason, �'�
again, that usages have a way of expanding in character. In short,
the Elk Mountain Lodge facility is very large and extensive, and I
has the potential to create a significant impact in what is a very � ':
�,. pristine environment. ;,
_ Sincerely, ��
_ : ��-�.�a� � .
Robert A. Francis j�
Chairman ,�s,
- l.
`� '�,
µ,.'_
� RAF/som ' 4-
1
S. �
, },��� i
' _ _ .. . �
. .;':: ::.:. „ ,:,'..- . . �.-., ....,. . :_ . _.., ,A� �� '�',f
t
I �� �'1s �
,� �
� -
`/ 1. ay�a
t :
--, { i � �
r" �� t,. � . -- �
l` t r�'� i
l. 1
- � ��)�!� ..� �
\ � f � � •
. . .
. : , ,
..
�. r -
, �. . : , : . . . . . ,.-
,; ::.. .�
. .
_ ., ,
� � .,:` :: -
_.. . _ .:. ,, .
;.. _.
�. . . �.. .- . , .;•-.'..., ._�.....K�_...'.. . ��- ,.... ...� ' ..� ....�. . .. . .�... '.� � . . �..... .'. .,
,��yy� _ �. . , . .. . .
. . .'viY� _ ' . . . . � . � . . .. . . . ' . ' � .
i f•'
,
�:.
.
� -� .�g�, _.: . . y� vi;eu
• . ' '�C • �3f�-LwC�l�3i�t.f�:...�..��w�4tM;,�..y: "� .��'- ... . .-R...��'���:- ;w'�:.3w.��'� 'r�`�.� bpya`l�i? Sa�r r+�y
, . ,.. .. :.,:1�L1�rF�i� * ..a c
. ' ' .---..._ sf�r�'�rt:: �..
� t._; .�i;
�%'1.4(1P/1��� �� �r .-., :;,
�/JZCL'.I� /ATTORNEYATIAW ��� K�1 {��''�� � .
' PROFESSIONALCOHPOMTION O . .�.
�Y=.
� i, �.�.,K.� .
106 SOUTH MILL STREET,ASPEN,COLORADO 87671 !�/i :;I .�
.- (303)925•6150 FAX 925-6151 . D h'' - �Z�-,�
� � -.'�.t..:. .
. � . . . . . •:.�`e.:,.
��
�
` � (.
February 3, 1995 ,��� �;
,.�,
_._ . F,�.
Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department ` ,�
Attn. Suzanne Konchan ,`"'
. . 4:-.'.`.
130 S. Galena Street '
Aspen, Colorado 81611
: �::t:
'!7„,�.�.
Re: Elk Mountain Lodge
;,�� .5. ..
.. . � .. .:�.�N".
� Dear Suzanne: ,� -
Several months ago, the Maroon/castle Caucus received a �i� ,.
` � referral. concerning the Elk Mountain Lodge. After considering that I� � `'
referral at our moathly meeting, I forwarded a summary of our �
" comments to the Planninq office. As you may be aware, one of our � �`
concezns was that the appiicant•s proposed usage was somewhat
vague, and we were concerned that, as sometimes happens with land ;
use projects of this type, the usage would eventua2ly expand beyond -.
. ` the parties' original contemplation. ( � ';��
Recently, we have heard the rumor that that may have happened ! �
• in this case. Specifically, it appears that the Elk Mountain Lodge
is being marketed and used this winter as rental uaits.
We thought it appro riate to call this to is�Y �;
p your attention. , :
)�
'ncerely, !` �`
�� .. . . . � . I i� .
u�`.��'c.��.
Robert A. Francis
Chairman , i
_ i ,
G�'i �F .
� ; t•
x�F/som �8 61S� �
. F � � 4�
cc,,� ,�nt. ! , , • `-
oEyt`J �'` '' _
� ` .
4 PENJp��. �:
� ;r
;L r.
_ }� �
:''+" Y..
. ,` /.�� ' - �''� ,��"s'S{
� .. . , �'.� .� .� ��. . � ' �, . .
' ..�.�. � - ' .. .
.. �.. . ,�, .. . . � ,,. �, � y;.,-
�`� ��-. -` . f: , �� �� ' .,: ' � +� c
. . �� � . �! '�`� �
1, � • t, � �;
•�,
i e . .J �
..\ , '�� .. I l .
,
. ...:,� �.;..��'.._ .... . .. .:.:: ' _ -.-� � � , -�:�:.- , � : � .I.� .
�' .., .., ...� ... _-.. . , � � '
l" .
.. . .. .. .j. .
... .. . . . " ......_ "- .
. ... . -. �: ' . .. . : . '� '
. . ' ._.�- -� _ ...�. ' - .. �"_kl _;x._ ., . : ,. . :�'
��' �� �•.�:.. '.. • , �•.- . '. 'I�,�. .:. . � . " � . . . . �
:�;c�'"`q : - .
,�. . . . .
,�
. �.
, �:�.,.,_ . . .. . , �. . . � . . . ......�..-....�..•�.�.,.�.�.i�1h:�1:.at,�skrAiEe'+6i��;a•�r t:. t�''�ft;l�:
^r -
�l ��
� C�,i3 i t.l � -- W�s�t' �
. �;_�:� -�;�
�� - �:�
: -_y,::�::
� ti � a ..., --�.
�
_ -��:
���,
Y:; �,
, _:..:! ..�_,y
�y4 . .
yi,, .
. � ; ]•.���.
1� '��.� f'.
� i
. � • , � � „�.�.�,.
, r �
. : a...y.i .
..___": � � � y� .. .
, �: ,�,�,.�.:-
4
� , . � �� ' ` . . . � _�r� .
. . .. � � �� � . ..._ ._ - _ . �,�.�� ..s.
. .. . . . . . . I..
. . � . ..: � . . I ���.� .
;__ .. _.._ .._.. ,_ _.._. . ._.. . . . :.----- � i�
, -- - .-- - — a.
1 � �
l �
j . -
j i,
` � ,3.r:
----------------- -- • i
� ----- ---•---u- i
- ..'�^i, .""._"" _ ` .._. _ ' -
' � � . . ., r , � t`,
�:_ .
����i �
�.�'��_-.
t �'
� : � : -� � �
, :, r_ ;:„•� i+,j��'��n �
.:�,� •- -- .�i � _ �
..�. --�_ . .�'" a
'V � .r�s i -��►,M � ;. .
�.--� —f� •�i�f/;�--- ; , .
� '`-..
� •:;.-`� i _ ,�;
: ..c� ; �.il�,
� - - -- : . _ _ _ . _. _. -- --- -�-�-- ; �''
� '--
r�� " ST ,
e,4611�1 E ` �` L `
- ';� `;
� ;
- �
z����
' _. �......,........-- - --- �+M"y�;' ���,?" y.
/ - ' � ' _
� `:
7 � t 1
\ -_ • ,.--�. <
�',.�tf
� �' .
,` , .
7 .
.. _.
� . . :. �� .�. . - . . . y, �..�. . . ... .� ,_�.. . . --' : � .
��.: . - , . � . . . - _ .� � .. . . � . '
,��'zT '
,t,
.�.,�'.
. . "__ _' •�.:Fj.�j�;�
.'.AY':: .. 9°e��:45tiA.
Sy:
. ,•'
l�`
-- �;���`;
�_ . ,_
• ,.
� � 540�iSJ ��
. . . , . .+':r+
. " � , ' lf� , ". ..
� ' - � , q�dieatlen e! Tr�il Cauw�nt . • � � ��S'�
�• r
� .: .
. , 11n unp�v�d traii �aM��ee la her�by Mdiue�d *.o tittin CAwty le �s f:
� 2aeation rnswliy ��c3aiaesary co eh� Oeunsy Lnqln��t and dw '
App3leaae, and cd1�C.id on N� dt� plaa ot th• Llk Ilounuln � 4`�:
Lodq�. SA� uM ei �eeor v�plelu !a pcoAl�lHd en eh• ef�il . C �:
- v�����ne. �:e�pt �� n�wu�cy !or ru�enaDl• aalnt�n�eca. '1!u �., �"-
- yTant o! thia �asn�ne 1• •xpcu�ly eendlelon�A upon elf� Oounty j'�.;,
yra�idinq �d�qwt� in��ranc� aqainn �� loo er dn�q� oeaaa3oa- :�
�d 6y puoiie uM oi !h� �aa�u�ne. �,.:
�. �
� l�r��= . . .. .
� .� ' i�t rietien■ te �e�r F+r�tier aui�divl�ien . • � � .
.. : �• Peep�etY i� h�c�by d��d nsee:et�d aq�ln�e any :arth�e - "
rubdlrlaion or. !h� addition oL aery ladg� uniea.
' ,aw-c. r. '
� . _ `_.� '. - , �ner�voeilt� nrtd v�lieevi�r■ - � � .
1
. ' � � .. � Ib �aarnobil�• ec h�licoye�ra ahal: � upd Sa een�uncslan xlih� � � � ..
' .tA• Prop�cty• ' -
. . . . . . ►9w.�f�f M�� . .. ' � . .
1
- , . ' . �Zlti.wnn ir`�Qf/ � � . � .
� �•� 1Tta Prop�rty S• E�nby dpd r��e::tt�d to allov unllmtesd d�y
� tiaA�rp�ewn aeeu• rtthin eh• r�t�seauri� �nd tA• oun�r asy '
�- -�� , ' liale eD� typ� af b�Le u��d. 'Ais •qY�m�ne ti •:pzusty . - "
_. . - eondieioa�d upoe e!�• Gounty provid.nq adpuaL• la�ueane� �qaSnie . .
. . � ' .� a�! lau or dadg�d oecaalan�d ty puDSSc uu ot aadd aecs��. . .
• . .� �
� . . . lR..+�.• C... �
, ' ' _ Y�a.e+ � . � .
� . . � � 11].2 •:lacinq trua and zip�rian v�q�utlon vitl�in LSO horisonerl � ( � �
. , - � LNt ot Cascl• CT��k �hall w ptu�tv�d. . . . . .
_.:.�:�,�.�..\� . � . . . � � . _ .
. -- --��' :. . . .. � � . . .
� .._ - � i � . . � . . , . . .
, . . ' . . " � ] . .
� � �� . . � . . . : . .. � � .
' � '�� ' � .. . � � _ _ ... . • , .
. ' ' . � � . � . . � � . � � M�'.
. . : . ' �� . -. .. . . -� . � . . . - �,.# .
. . . . . .. . ��..
: . . . . . . . . " . .. . �1�\
t� 3.
. ' � • � � . . � � .� � ' i;',�
. � . � . . � � � - � . .. M.._-'_._— i.
- - . '
. . . � �'��: � � - }�}
... •... . '� :.�' ` ��: - •�' . � ' .
+:..
'�.-�-' � ' . Y.. r.�.�.. .
� _ ' . . � . . . � h':
. / .. .� .. �.
. � , �' . ' . � '•
l .. . . . . . � ' ' \
. - -•.`,� � .. - �-_
,.. " • 'r' ,.
. - . . � _t�.1�i . - .
, �.
. . . .. � , ...'
.' ,_ �:: . � _. �- :; . . -... .�..... . .'.... „ . . .
�'.-.-' ...:' ' ' ���...� .. . . �. _..:.: . . ,. ,. : � .��.�.' � � :� :.
�.\. �, � .. � .. : .
. .. � ..� .. � . .
.. ��y p-. _ . - _. � � � .- � � : .� ,
. � t� . . .. - ' ' � . _ � � - ,. �
- . . .. . . . , .�- .
.r�: ,
°i
... . ... . .. . • . _. ._... ... .... ...,_._. .. . . � ... F . �r�-.Ls^:i.
_ .� . ` � . ��c�;�} r,i. .
. . � ' � [
� • . �E 3� . � .�: t ,c�;
. . ' . =s� . .`. - .� � �"'.:`�
. . o � ,..
_ _ ..... .F ...
' ' �. ' -L: ' • ' ,�' , - :*'r�3:
•r' .°i, :}'; , � . .�•� '`�' ,'y,s
- . . - .. _ :.,•.::::..,.� . :.i '� . � j
.}:. t
. . _ _,•;::.".'a� . • I ,1:., _ t ' .
. . . . .- `_�.1'\�. :.r.; I p, '..
•.S�'• \t -- � . • g "'?
. � '_�:� �1�:..� , o _
- - -- • . � � .M. `.o�� `o v . � s
�. . . :�r�: ;3 :��! .� . -. �:�:�l" . � °"..
. . c,� .�::. . ��� .. �:\,�`: ';
• Y :. � . .°` a_%.:� � . . I�,1`�. .. - �q
9 •� 'f: , : • . ;+A! j1!' - i.
. ' 8 � . .;:�""'., . .. �� .'�f' ' ` �
. � :,,:s . . . . ...�o��� �. � . ;;';:,I �
. � � .: : � : � - . � , .. :`;��E�� ,}: :.
. - . . - . , .. :..:r _ �
. � � � � '�=.��~�`- _:� .' r (' .
. . . .�:.:� � -;����.�. ( . �.
. . . . . , • ' �'� \�,,"�`�4 `1� �\\.. e , .
�•�� �'�� 1��.
• • . , $ . • . •.�I� ���',�'. �s _
• • � � .�, �:�' '`'
� � .F- . . � :; '�,I;►� ;
�,
, . . � . . rl ., �,�: _ ,
, : . ..�:, - � 'o . � � `�. � -� �
. . ., (':.,..
� � . . . : . . . � 3 � � : : :•`. m,'� ::�` ' . .
. • .: � 1�..i
; . • . �. _ � �. . ',�,�_:..:.t .
� ..�:� . . ,
� . :g �.� � . � .; �!'": . i . ;
. ... �. • _ . � U —°��.:a . ''.`.%' ii' i . �
' � o �'� .. ..' :. . .•.t ''•�'�' �. � . 1
. � Zr._' . . � .. ...� •' . _ C 1
, m 3.p .,. �,`': •:. ��..� . '0 3 �
. ♦ �U o v7`�'• : ' •_ �� p'1� o - � .-�..
. c U' sp.g., - s".' .lt :.1• _ � �'•' " 3'. � '�`{j`.,:
a `o � �' �/ • - • L s�°'^ \ � Sr+•:
. � � � o�tV�'. . . . ' V� a .\ '
� t,�a a: . . . � ._ , � 1
;�:, . s , s-�% . s � i
.'�'.�� �
, � �w �� : . .E•� ..�,� • � s o \ ;��
. U' • ' E fi d,'. 4':.� . . . . �
���n•:':: : Z� �•' �
� � O�'u'O a c W . . �
' g _ -..--.;�'
--.�....�..,.....�-----�--�--- --... �.:.w..__._.-
/.�__ r - �s1,t
�
� . � . . . .. � -� . . - .. � . . �'i +
. _ , . . .. . . _ � . . . � . �. �=S� �
. � � `' (, . ��� �
`, ..� , � . . ��� � f .
; . � . , ::i,t�S; - ..
.. � �' - �. . . . . , . . � . . � . .. �- � � .
.. . . .� . . . .
.r..., . . ' •:. .'.:, . :,..'= .:�.. : ..,.. _.. . �.. . . . � . . . ... . . ._ t . .
.. _ . ,_ .. . . . . .
.� .... . . . . . . .
:.� .. - _-�._ ��:. ..�..__' . :-;.l.-.:'.. :..�. .. � . . .. . ..:. .
�� � � .::.. " _�.. ' .. . .. ; . . . . ._.. . .
���ffi - ' � .
�-sf. •
�
:. �
e ' . • �J��r.,, ".�:rJ�'�'
��a c-��. . �., n, � :
r�.'<� �•.�:�'�I �_tcdlir� . .... ' '���I,O!'`��wY�s�. �1��tY��n.� r{�SL � �.r�,.
...-..a� • `[
�� . _
�..i..GiAJir_-�aT�.•Li. U�[.y.,. -.�A�t•c�i.'��..��.����� (. V:
. �� t F
' � ' , •.. � . . .. . � . � � •��Z�' ' - ,��
C c�x�- .� �
,,�.
� R013ERT TAYLOR 3RO '
POST OFFICE BOX 445 r''. '
ASPEN.COLORADO 81612 ��'��
. - . �. . . . . . . � � � i y�� .
_ :. . �. � .� � . . . . � . . � . - � . .. � � �,f.
� . . .. . . .. , . . . � . . . . . . . . jt,
, . . . .. .. . . .. . . �f.
-- - March 6, 1995 � :�
+..,�
, . . . . . . , . .. . �F' ..
Aspet✓Pitkin Counry Planing and Zoning Commission s''
130 South Galena Street
Aspen,CO 81611 • � '
. ' "���.
. Attn:Mr.Rick Magill
- Dear Sir: , `�
This letter concerns the applicadon for a limited use permit for Elk Mountain Lodge located at
' ' 10080 CasUe Creek Road. The property is owned by Mrs. Ellen Randall and
Mr. David Middleton.
I have visited the property on several occasions over pas[years and arn familiar with the Lodge -
and with the plans Mrs.Randall and Mr.Middleton have made for the use of the Ladge.I fmd
these plans to be appropriate for this property. There is no kitchen in the I.odge and none is
planned. There are no overnight accommodations in the Lodge. There is nothing in their plan
• that should disWrb the pristine beaury of the sunounding area.
As a long-time permanent resident of Aspen,I am particularly sensitive to development in Piticin
: County. I have walked on severat occasions through the beautifu!upper Casde Creek Valley +�
area. I fmd the Elk Mountain Lodge to be an attractive part of ffie facilities presently existing
,\ in the upper Castle Creek Valley.I strongly recommend approval of the limited use permit being
_�.� sought by lvirs.RandalI and Mr. Ivliddleron.
, �:
Yours truly,
. '1
rf �
' . 'YJ�'�^K�� . . � - .. . . .. � i
Robert Taylor 3'" . ` R '' :
• : �:
' � . � . � � . - . . . � . .... . �4:.'.
- . .. . . . . . . .. . . � � .
. . . . , . .. � ��.� , :�`.
� '' '' �` -
,
. ,j ' ;.
,
. � ��
�� � _ ,F � �r �
� ���; b h.
� �b�
:' z .,f _ � j 4}- .�
.� �..-._�� '+ ./ �
t
� b �
', q � �+ �
� - �i r !,
� , •r
�. ;` .
� f
. . ._
- .. .
, _:x._., ._:.: ;.
�: � ' .
��� ,
� ,
;'.'�.a.0
..:_f _ .,
•...,,..•: . ._ _ _ .. : _ _. ._ . • , _
__ rf.��<�k�,;,
� >'=h,�,..: �..
� , ., i . . . �. �Z2
. . .� . �,, , :�
� � . . � - , =: .
, �=: ,
I ..�.,��
_ . , . . � s�::,
. , ,-. � L�:
, �.;c
• . . . • ' ��
. Txe Cirr op Aser,� '
_ , , ;;� �,.
.... . . . _ . . . . � Or��or Txe Mero� ' .�h i
, ' March 6, 1995 � '�
- -- - . . • . • . . :��
Board of�itkin County Commissioners ` "���''
i • . Pitkin County Courthouse . � .
' S06 E.Main St.� '
� i . .Aspen,CO 81611 � . � : �a
. R�: �lk Mountain Lodee x'�
. . .�t.
. To the Board of County Commissioners: � , � :'�
. . • . , ,` �
�' . � I am writing as an individual to support the idea of allowing certain' 3
... special events at the Elk Mountain Lodge. ,I am�not familiar with any '�'
details of the current application before you,but I do wish to support the
' concept. ' • ' ,�
. • � Janie and I were married on Butt�rmilk Mountain in June of 1990. • �• '
. �After the ceremony,our wedding guests assembled in the Buttermilk � . �'`�
. ,parking lot and were bussed to the Elk Mountain Lodge,�where our .
reception was�lield. The Ellc Mtn.Lodge—with its lake and extraordinary -• ..
' views—tumed out to be an absolutely perfect place for a wedding �
reception..It could not have been more beautiful,and our families and our �
�..
guests had an extremely special experience there. . . ;
Having enjoyed such a special occasion of my own at Elk Mountain,I • � :
�._. � would hope others could have a similar opportunity. It would seem to me • :;
that a reasonable number of such speeial events wou�d be in keeping with � � ��
- die long term,underlying zoning,which I understand_allows a small lodge. . . '
:�,
- � Thank you very much for your consideration.' .. ' �
. . . . . �.• ,
.. . .. . Sincerely, . . ' • _
� ' • n : .. � °�,
' . .. .. .. . . . . .. ' � . � '- � � . . y•t
�.6.i
� � John S.Bennett � .�_ � : :�, + �`:.
�� _' - . ". • ' . i,
� � . • . . . S1
• . �,
� � ' ��JO SOVfII CALQIA SiRER•ASPEN�Cow�noo 81611•Pna+e 307;9205199•F�x 3D3.920.5119 � • . . � .
'. ' ' Nrdw�MlT� . . ,_'! �(
�, `. . - � _. ' 'Kii.l��-k��' :Y�u�-ir:ax��w.w...�. .�y_ .�-�4LS...ir�wL'yy.1�i� ;�.:�bL�ld.li�'�q'AY'4
� S
:,..y���.J_3���;�(: � �
. .' .:: . . , ._... . .
e�,����.��1 �t
t
.�`� /�' . � . . . . � �� .�..`.
� .. �.. �'l'S . !
' 4�.
�
� - i 1
` �' - . _ �
s _;-,
� ?�
, .
,.1 I , .- ' ,_ .
� -
. . ;
'� -
� .
. .
.: :- , . - , '; ,
.. .. _y.- ,'! _ . , . . -
. �. . . . . .. . _--
. -�: . , . . . -.. . . ... � .
. .��� �.�.� _ � . � � � . . . . � . � � . . ' . . . . - � � , .
. � . � . i . � � �
'� - .
.��
�,�' T•, .:•�YC. .;�w:;..tt.. ..ir... , . r9. 4....... .. . . � . ,... '. . 3!?1CcredtblY' ''i�Q�It'kYtaWtstY531�S'ull�a45I�56l:3r �"yn �•�;
t �t 1 . . • '�.Y �l'.
f ` . '6-�g-4 '1:
# �� p �.�`.��
;� �
7.
� - . � �-'� '+., �
' j� 4,:�.
... � f t'y rJ
. . .. � . � .. � � . . . . .. . . � . . 4
� . 28 June 1995 t ft
� �
sr
___ Board of County Commissioners s�„ ;.
Aspen, CO 81611 �y :
. . � �. . - . � . � . � � . . . . � � r.�;.
� . .
`
Dear Boar.d of County Commissioners,
�.
The upper Castle Creek Valley is graced with a unique natural resource: an Yy� .
approximately eighty acre wetland created by beaver and muekrat management of
Castle Creek since the last ice age. The importance of these Riparian areas
is well documented in ecological and biological research literature. For at `a•'
least the last fifty years, this area has been largely under private ownership
and therefore has had limited access. Since the sale of the Ryan property to �'
the Forest Service, roughly one third of ehis area has had managed public accese. ,�;
It is only by such'limited and managed access that the integrity of this invaluahle
wildlife habitat has been maintained. Increased public accesa beyond what current-
ly exists would be detrimental to this complex and fragile ecostructure. It
would also be counter-productive to nearly fifty years of effort on the part of
the residents of the upper Castle Creek Valley to emphasize conservation, ,
restoration, preservation and education for the benefit of the entire community. ,;+-
The portion�of this area which is owned by the Farest Service is more than
- enough for public accesa. Requiring the present owner to grant public access is, •
in my family's opinion, unnecessarily intrusive (especially' as Castle Creek is
Aspen's drinking water) and not in tune with the Commission's current efforts
to preserve fragile and unique places with the proposed Rural and Remote Zone.
It is our understanding that the present owner will welcome access, managed by
the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies, for ecological and environmental :
' y .
! education.
.:::�.���i. �. . �
?-� Sincerely> _
/��c�.� �
_:__ _ i
Bruce Mace > �.
t - ';. .
�
i
• { �`�
rr
� � �9
. � } 1 �-
.r_
�, , , �1;
.. . . . � � . � - .. . � �. ;i,��,
. ... . � . . . . . . . . J ',1.
li ��♦1
Post Office Box 1048 • 11247 Castle Creek Road • Aspen, Colorado 81612 � � ,,
(303)925-7345 . 3
•. �
, •. .. .. .:_. ;�..�,.,. :;..� . ...�..._. . _..��.._.�.,�...,. _�......-. •`�
, „;,:..-_.
� .
.ti:w-aty.x.,'.��:,�«+�1ai.:+ou�ww+Yae',�'tivr+s�+`s?+�w:�-`a�..,�{.x.u, _ _.-^� :_�. �a:+.c�sui-.1 � �. �:
_ �. .
�.. ., _� . .... . . �� .. �
/: . . . " .� , .. ��.
_ � . _ . , . � . pp��?{�t 7 F ,1
� �a . .. � - � •
' j l
�
,, :,
� , . ; � ; . -
,.•.
� . � :_`
� ..
. . . ,
, ,. ,. , -:_ ..:
. , ..
. ,,
. � � ` .� ' .
..- .. ;,., . _ . .
. : . :. . , . .
_ ::.:.. . . ! .
. ,_...
- ,. - - : �
. ,� _�:-. -.>- -- - - . .;�_.� <.,
� � .. ;;. ; .
-�: .` - - , . ;,
,��� _ .
�'
,.��: , - . . ' � , ,
� �
_ , �,..,�,�,�,:
' ,. !t'' : : � . . � � i i vl�.
. . . . . . , • �, , S
,� , � � � .. , �b� � t:,
t� . � �� , . , �=.� :�
�, . . �,,,,� . ;,.
• , . � . r . �� � . . . ' , � t, r�t,�j.
' �7 i�
• � June 23, 1995 � :� �
. . {� ,;.
.. ' � - . . - � ' . . � '� -.t
,• � , To: Aspen/Pitkin Planning and Zoning Commission �J =
. �,
~,�
-- ' From: Tom Gardamone. . ''`.�'
�'
Re: Elk Mountain Lodge and Castle Creek Riparian/Wetland Ecosystem ' 't �'�
.. . ' ' . . � . . . y
� � .. ' . . . . . . ,' , - � - - !.f:f. •
< Dear P & Z Cortmissioners, � Q :
� I'm communicating with you at the request of� Ellen Randall who • tfi
I am acquainted with through ACES' Naturalist Field School in which • y �`
. she has participated. • ' � � �
` � � Although I believe gaining or preserving appropriate fishing access ��
to our rivers and streams is a legitimate roTe for P&Z , I am concerned '
' about the negati've ecological impacts of establishing fishing access ;�
� across the broad riparian/wetland ecosystem of Castle Creek between - . ��
- Elk Mountain Lodge and Taylor Pass Road. • • -
' - The combination of wetland and riparian ecosystems in this particularly
broad swath of floodplain i� very rich habitat supporting more biodiversity
than any other ecosystem type in Colorado.
. Balancing recreational interests and wildlife values would be best �
accomplished by identifying less intrusive access to Castle Creek than
exists between Elk Mountain Lodge and Taylor Pass Road.
Si�/�
r �� (,G��_:.
1"om Cardamone
. ' .� j y .
` : � . � .—� .; .
" :;,
'�� . s:
- ��.
. . .
, , .
� . - . . - . , �
'. � ;
. ; ;,.
� , ;
;:!',.
I � . � �;.
� ,,,
; . _ ;� . � . ' -' , �`_�
� . � , � �
. , , 4�1.
� �� � • . � �i�
100 PUPPY SMITH STREET•,ASPEN,CA 81G l 1•970/925-5756•FAX 970/925-4819 � `
. � r
_ .�.�..—.-�.�..�..�: �,: � ���
•\ `(__._"' -� ; >
� . ��,
/ �i i h-
, �=}
` .�t '4 k' �
` . -' lt
i xh�,;° =,,�- �
'� � '-,. - .
_ -; 1
� - :, - _ - -
-� -
���� .,'. - .
,f,. " - •
` �
��'�iYf I�.., ... _' ' . .. . . � � - � . .. _ . _ . . _. _ . . - .{._�.,_a ..
. . ._��F,'`.Af,f��H^.,
�. '^L
y;.
��`,
6-as-a� ;�.:.. .;c:
t.,.
Date: June 28, 1995 �:.;: ��
��':'--.::
,�..�.
To: Board of County Commissioners :��= '�..
;r"�,.' K'J
� From: John Wilcox �`"c�'��'��.:z _
� 12300 Casde Creek Road `t ::, .'.'
:i'::: .
? Aspen,CO 81611 -,�s e,-.
i � st•' ',:
s ":
� As a business and land owner in the Ashcroftvalley, I,along with many of the employees �r:.�_� ,,. .
--"� of Ashcroft Ski Touring,are very concerned about the Elk Mountain Lodge applicadon. � �
� It is seeking approval as a"club house or recreational building used in connection with and j �:``^�.`
' accessory to a permitted outdoor recreational use." It is our feeling that the application has �
�;�'�;f.,�.�.v. -
� no basis for approval because there are no"public recreational uses"operating on the Elk �
1 Mountain L.odge property prescntly or as I understand,planned for the future. Outdoor �;Y;�'r�<.,
recreational use in itself is a S ecial Review Use,under sub art 21,the same land use code `
P P (�.�7�j
� provision. (Please see attached document"exhibit A"). 1•��
Although historically the property was used for lodging and horseback outfitting,it has not '
`�f�:
been used in this manner for over ten years. In fact the past ovwers and the present owners r+�
never completed the main lodge building, leaving an eyesore Wat Wose of us living and
working in the valley have had to endure.
" The present owners came to the commisioners in work session several years ago to express
their interest in converting the property to a single family home. They even proposed an
indoor basketball court, and a conversion of many of the structures that were built for
employee housing to resident occupancy housing. At that time they asked for additional ;:;'�
� time to compiete the main structure into the single family home. This never happened,and �!
now they propose commercial usage without a)the headaches of being open all the time � '
- and with lodging rooms (which is why the lodge was approved in the first place) b) ,
properly mirigating employee housing for the employees that would be working on the ,t:
property, c)providing public recreation facilides on an ongoing and daily basis. � ���
I call your attention to zoning officer Joanna Shaffner's memo to Rick McGill dated
December 28,1994. It is cleaz from this memo that the zoning department does not believe
_'�_ that there is a nexus between the clubhouse and the recreationai activiries. Shaffner goes
on to state that"private parties" are not an appropriatc use to be included under"club
house or recreational buildings used in connection with and accessory to a permitted
outdoor recreational use" c•Qy�rrn��r "13�� � � �
I also call your attention to section 7 of the memorandum for today's meeting from Rick � � •
McGill. In this section the applicant proposes utilizing six thousand square feet for"limited � �,
commercial uses". I-Iowever, Section 7 does not tell us how the six thousand square feet �^ '�;
would be used in conjunction to the outdoor activities. It is also clear from section 7 that .r�:.
• the applicant also intends to accommodate group gatherings, catered events, weddings, y,'�
3 receptions,conferences,etc. But I see nothing in McGill's memo that suggests why these ;•.•� -
- � �ty
{ ;,
;: 5
. ��;s
.. .
i
1 1
,rt 41Y
, . ._�.t#'���"�^?6ii 'k�,�,A"'p;'e'Tyu� «z�3�. .:{° ..riz ,. .. , . , . , ... .. .., � - y{���
_ �T
// �,:
' . . . .. � . � . . . . . ' .� 0 . . �:; .
. . . . . ��� . . s
� '� _ � . . .. . . . � � � . � ♦
. . . ►. - . . ; . - _ . �� .
. . . . . . _ � - . . � � • I. `- .
� : . • . .. . . .
� . . . � � � . . . . � .."i��1.•� � . � • .
' \ ' � . . ' . . . I . . . . .. . �
. .. . � .. .. . _ . . .. . � �. .
�� . : . . . . � . . - � . . .. - , • _
. i'��S w � , . . . . . . . , ,
� �
+�
�? �. ",. r, �;:�� ;: , t` �''; �.%,-
�h1S:a:..R._ .a�:.. «......_ �.. ._ . .. . � ,,.,uv....[r...,..,,�w�.c.:n...►:+.a...w:N.. —.»..�.w.�..
� �Y� . .. � . . � . . � - . (,/,
�
� " .. . �� . � � ... . . 'i,. .
.t� .. - . . .. . _�__. . p,.;'
.. .. - . . . .� . . . � . . . � - - - � :'.. .
_ . . .. � . . . . . .. .. ,�,.�
� utiliu the lodge as a"clubhouse or a recreational building",is actually creating a"catering � �''.
� hall." This simply is not why the structure was approved in the 5rst place. Fu;ther we feel
that catering parties in a snc thousand square foot hall,for fifty-two events per yeaz is not �;
r
"limited commercial uses". �� ,'
�
r
r,. �,�^�
; ;� � ��
{I . " . ' .�.'s%°!.',� . _� � . . . . . ...fF .���. .
1 � JO}lII W11COX �� I��..
.} :I - � .�..
:� 1
:: �.,.:
� � - -
,�
:� =. - : . . , . .. ,
-. ... ,. . , ; ;. ;
, : : ,. �: �:��-..
: ; _
� .. - �:
� � :
'c, s I
. . _"- � °� . . � �' '•:
_ ' ` �
, .
, . � : . . ,; . .
i
, . . . .. . . . : - - •.I
� .
'-' �: � ��. I ..
t� �
I+ F
�
� � � ..:' 4 ��
��li�
".i,
- .. . � � � ' Al
\ � a
�. � . i y't�� L . �` �� i'� _ �
� / � .. t�w.�a'F� `' j -' $ 3Gs
, *"' r � � � _ �� t ♦ s ��z"��.�t
� z n/��n}r.��.T "� 4� �. �.� L .;` ° `fiTr�.
/\ ����)��`[�-.c Tk ; �r d ; ti
' tYn 1 �Y�K 4 4 � �' �� :V
1 }k �S�f �y�'�j a'> t�'� r �� ; r '�^ �.a t
��}
� �
�i �A..;2,��.�r i � .s�a �, {f y r.� ...� !
' ;���;�i�E.��T��tt T � f #��„r � � '
� � rv � �
1.. ., '`�'` ' :T 5 ;1 �. •
.� I Xj]IA��)�� L . Y .} �
� ' 3�,�'j���P2��y„ ���X $ � � r
� �z''r:.� r` ,� } ,
�
_ ,�.�a.� ��s {�( �y' < 3 r � e �< � � / ' ,
� 1 1� � ,� ��tk ` � , � .
,�p�c - .
:..f: - .
�,,�i�,� ' � ^ ;�....•� .�y�r �p,��i....5��� !�4
�`Sa d_ �.-v. . .. ' � . ..�n� .-,� Yf.rl�:�f"�i,3.a.Wb)tk��tyl�'�hr4+r�.�'�khs�iL�.16mYYlY�:lt1�fiP .''•'� �9
... ;.aacn� a�:�r_r:�. ,. �.. :�... ..,. �,:t'.
" a•� '
JLI�I 28 '95 04�22PM MCFLYNN& PICKETT P.2 ,. ��'
�' S�
� ' � � ,r� �Kd
�x}�1 Pl l '
y� �
� ;.�.
sL� 1�6D7Yi71IY LODG1! � '�'r�''�y
Qp�OI7LL AlVIaR ' ! ` �'�;���
.�.��/� ..�..
� S. Thoro is aurrontiy extablished a prinaipai uea Por this �
'.t ....��y
` property, vthith use is sinqle family residen�iel. Tha paGcat ���,`'
�. uateriais ara compiotely silent as to what, ii anythinq, ia ;5;:� . •�r
proposed for this ourrarit•use. Ss it qoinq to be te�rmfnated? If `"�"
?''� so� doasn�t this terninatioa need to Do menoriaiiz.d in tba .�''"-`"
Rnsolution oP approvai for the �cw Bpeatal Revierr vee? If it is �.;;.s°�-;°-
. -n.
i not proposad ta 1» terminated, then ahy r►ot? Wouldl��b thi�
constitute a �eaoad prinoipal use oa a singla parcoi oi property? k�`.?
, One oi tha primeYy Yt11eo oY practiae under ttlo Piticin County Lnnd
' Us� CoQ� hes !or yaare been that each sanaretQ paraoi ot proporty '�`': ;^
.r��.;
i. is entitia4 to one a�sd only one primary uee. I4� that rulo novr uy.
'$9 beinq abanaoned? What ia t.ho proposad principal us�, end hov nany �'+y `�
rinai al usea are ( y ) ''�'
i' p p qoing to ba parmittod on thia or en othar , ��,,
proporty? �• ,';�i?
'I I�:�: .,
ix. it appears from th0 niateriala that thia appiication ie sn �
I �ttempt to traut the proposed "clubhouse" useqe of ttls lodqe
:�',%�
; building pursuant tb g�-4o9 C.6, ot tha Land Uee Code. That '•°a,r
j;;; �eoEion provides Por special Review pernisnion to use "clubhousea , '
, or Reoreational SuilQings paeQ it1 ooltttection with and accessory to ��
a �ernitted oLt�±oor reareatSonal u9e.M The problem bars i� that F
I th�Yd ir apparently no parmitted outdoPr reereational uee �p '
- I estaHliahea on thia proparty. That use is itsalt w 6peeiel Reviev 7
Vu under subpart 21 0! that same i,and Uee Coda provirion. Whora
ia th� sy�oiel RYViaw approval for the outdoor aativitioo to whioh a,.
- this clubliouoe io purportodly aca��aory? Thp paokst lails even to
' mention in paasinq a siapie proposad outctoor ur• Eor that prop�rtY, ;�� ;;�;ti
�' nuch less a Speeial Permitted prinoipai uae. ThQ lodqe aannot ba ;l:
per�itted as a structuzg aacessory to an oU�door usa whioli hs�
f itsalf not bean paraitted, suah less even ravealad.
Jr ==i. 9ihst ia clear ia t.hef this purport�d use is a sh�a �nd
' aubterluge for vhat 3m really beinq proposed. That real uae mu�t - ,,;,
�,. bs astaqorized as � loAga or publio beetinq hall ornmmeroial
y operation. 1►e such, it is in itseli e prinoipal uss and is in no �`
i way eaoeeftory to any aetuai or proposed outQoor raer'ationai ua�.
� 11cCassory usos ara very cle�rly Qofinad in the code ae a use that
� is naturally and normally incidental to, subordin$te to� anG t ��p
�{ � devoted priaarily to thn prir►cipai vao o! tria preaises. How does
the eomonereisl ttm� ot the lodge as a wddinq or rocaption hall in
Any vay ralate to, much leeta beaome inoidental to �ny oonooiv3bla '.
I. outeoor recreationai use7 (NOte lut�ther thttt thn c!elinition ot �
aco4saory uso makea it claar that thie Rcc�raory ur• may aot bs
• eatabliohed pzior to the eetablishxant of th� ti*�� us�, • •
bxiel�inq full airala to our oriqinal point -- vh�re ia tha speoial ; � -
Reviev permitted outdoor =eareational use on this propartyZj -
� `,�!;•
, �zf
,
� ''
I'
� ' ���
L �•
��:i� '
j j;�
;4'��.y:
.,i�f,�a„�,
' i`--� . w ...s i . �... � ., � _ �. � , , . �;x:�
a
� . •;;: ,
__ 4 . : ��:
� .
, .
, ..- �
' ,
E�.- '
��N�T� ' . . . ..
:��.
� �,..
:��'> � , , "
•�,�,..,r;t;i','r,
;�i�;. r..�e..i.
. ' '��'¢'��
�.. .. . . ..._ . . G��l����r..». �./! . .. .. __.�........._. � 'A'�;;�?�tl
s� - "t�=� ,a
�� _ `-1? .
!'�.S;T��'c• .
, �, �,
3 . . :�,�... ,,1'
l[ � 1L O � iYD II1L ;�.��'�� .�3
, 4t-_'
�lOt Rick iSaQill, PlatstYinq . ;j-:' 'i
i r
7�G�[a 3oatlna 8. SehaPfaar, Zon3tfg Otiicerd� '� `
_..-- � „,:.�'?.
I Df'raf baosmbsr 28� 1994 7 e';';:.�:.'
i �e 3!]]c Mont�tain E.oflg. 9pacial Raviev i`��j��
i , naraal ZD# 2909�194�-00-006 � �{
� �.8'�Q�90�m���1t�0�i�C�C�C�'L"�C�'f�d�Q�O�����S���O�����/�����i������ �� .
� Y lsave ravlewnd the above retarenoed appli�ation anQ olter tha :�,����:a ..
lalloviaq aaomants. h
I�
'`1
' � �oNAt 1�R1�-lo, ton aarn minimum lot aiao �l��� '
,�-;
� i This parael contains in excee5 0! So aare■ anQ is coniorminq in '��`', "
sizo. ••r�.
I AE�L�H,CYB: Tha rnquired setbaaks Eor thi: p�rc41 ��e:
100 toot major road setbaak a� maasurad lrOat tYse
. I Marvvrt Craek Rotsd right-ot-way i '
70 Poot minimtua mYs�am sotbaok ��
100 foat tront yerd eetbaqlc `.
50 Yoat cida ya�rd setback
50 toot rsar yard sotback
7'L007t ARS71i BOCC Reso 86-5� tt q=oss `'"�'
pproved a maximum o! 29,229
squara l��r. saa attachsd roso Yor � brea�k dorm oP this Cotal.
pl�aa� Aota that Raso 86-5 indicates aorn �xisting •tructtt�ras thaa
' ar� r�prss�ntad in ths currsnt applicstion, and this oYEics ia not
aware oE au�y demolition accurrinq pn th� sit�.
Ths tallovin tabl� is re ras.ntad � �I�
g p by the appliennt as oxistbnq
Eloaz ar�a.
Cabin A 2.600 square tQet ,y
� Cabin C °8�+st" 3eo square. leat
' - Cabin C •liest" 810 aquars lYet
Cabin D �.000 semwre eat
Tatal Ae.idenCial Flaox' Area 4�78a square lset
� Cabin E ^Hiatoric Ca.Ain^ i$ noC repreaented by the applicant but
' � is balinvad to b�a a residar►tial structur• whicri va� convartsd ' •
ri,thout permits aithin the laat raw yaar4. . . i "
i
�I The Lodqe has not bsen ineludad in lloor area calculationr btlt s
aontais�a approximaaaly ie,000 aquara Eavt.
�.
Pleasa note that tk�e nxittirig cabins appear to have been convort�d �}t
Co raridant�.al uaa without parmita. . ; -
�
-� It does not appsar CYtat the sum oP all structuz�s on tha eitie �
col7tain mora than 29,229 squara lQOt of lioor area. , �,r� .°
r,
y�.�
• 8T'd . 1.L'�1JId '8 h1JJ.'1fJW 4Ri9Z:60 96. 82 Nfif r''
� ti.�
. ... �..'-:..i�...�+Ff'�'�'vM�e X�eP._n.:. -��ni,.:.. ��14�.�'!1 �1 .r�� .. .'�:... , - e�...... ... ..... . . . . .. ..,.. y . ..n f��
r'�
� -. . ' . ' L�'.S �
�`.. . . . _ . . . � . . . 1:.� i.��..
. � . . .. .. . . . � . . . . . � . J:;. .
� � "` _ . . -. . . . � . _ . t t
, � . �_ . . . t: . — I.1�• i ,
, � . . � - . . . . . . � . ..
i .. - . . .. . .. . • � � . . '-.i�� . � - � . . . .
� � � �� . � � . . � . . . . . ', . ._.. . . ., . . .
i
� .. .. . ' , � , ' � . ' , .. '
� �; � . _' � .. ' .. ., , `
:.�'^F'ff,,�."� ' " . . ' -. '
..f. .
�� .:;�:�
. • ^
� , jr
3�� i �,i
�: � �'=
�t .:.
y • �`r ,.
. i'��
�'ry'�s
fls�a it appaers tbat ttu apQiiaa�nt is propoziaq two W�pa►rsti� uaso
�- !oz tqa Lodqa. TbM Pir�ti is � •Cluh houaa or reorastionai bu11,dS.t�q , ��,
used ir cotu�ecticn with aesd acca�sory to a pormittod outdoor
reorertionsl uss■. T2sa loaq� is not an aCe�asory strnctur�. Th� - <��
appliaant states that Y.ha uppex valley oi't4rp mar►y r�crestio�al � '
�ctiivi,tias, but ao�r noti �xplain riot+ nny ot theao uosp arQ ralatad t:
to tha yarapos�d "alub houseM. Sinca there is nc naxvs batween the �� `
- alub hou�e and eha rRCreational activitiees, it doaa aot seem iiKe �,,.,,�; '
- --- ar �ppropriato r�vi.�s►. Tha applicant furthar otat.a tt+at i� will ��,,.. �.
. b� usad !or group activitie� only. Cces the counCy vi�h ta � :.
i>' aaaourwqn aommeraial qroup �as o! r�crutionul sativitiss ir tl��
- val3oy? � :
i4sscadly, td►n appiiaant proposes asinq thn lodqo ior private �
pa7rtiea, privsta partias is not an �ppropriate nsm to ba inoludod n e :
undar MClub hauss o= zacrQational buildinq us�d in eonn�ction wfCri
and aaasasory to a permittad outdoor rscr�ational ussp. Again�
tlais 6o,�s �sot, s,pprax to b� tho appropriate review for this
.. �►ppliaatiion.
,-_:::
OY7l�7es Thr aoning oflia• haa reaeivsd complaints that the sit• �
has bo�an poatad xitls 1�f0 FZSHING and NO TRESPA$9TNQ eign� nlonq
Cutlo CrWk. Prwioua appreval■ r�quizad that a fia�tl3nq oaaam�tft �
b� d�4ioated to th� aotulty, but ao aarsment aqrsem�ant ha►a basn
lo�utQ.
, �l �
- ; � `: : , > ., .
- - • i ,
`
��
_� .r ' �
. . . . . . . . . . � � . . - . . . � - . . . � •h �A
. .__ --,V...�.' . .. . . . '' . . . . � . . t' `,.i
, .. ' . . . .. . . . � . . . � - . . . ... . � .. .
. . . . . � . .. � . . � . � i '
�1 . .. � .. . � . . � . ' . .. ��..
.. '.�, . . . . .. . , .. � V"..
y,�}
� �.. . � . . .. . . � �L@��Rf
� ... .. .. . � . . . . .. . . � . . . ..;(: ,.1�
� ��� . - � .. . . � ... . . � � . . . � - � . . . .. �i; .i '
�{
. i� ��
�,,
� _ � . ,!,
f; ��.
�
- _,i'.1 �� .�.i '4 t��,Ll'la'1L� F� c p� 4,y1� .
�.�..... . . .,. '�,ibar'. i' .;a:i. ,.,� �*:qs^.A*-c ���i�,����
.s 4
-��
� ..2�,.2i�u� . ti A '
�'.: �� �
� S
�.
a -
.0 ia
�/ ' � `+-!.,
f � . ♦
-. ��. ' � �..� . :. .
� ' , . : . �. . f ; . : �.
. . . .jt `-� �.�1; . 1".�_ .
�\ S - i • �'��rR ... � .
I � 'r
l � :,. .
f . .
,. _ _
: ,. - .
.... _
_,�.. _ .. �.�� f . .. _�_ �.�.:_. . . _ . . . .
. . � �; . _ � . . � . . � . . . . . � � .. � - �
. ��� . _ � . . . � . . . . , � . . . . . � � � . � .
.*f.: . .
'L*�
. � .'s�t-.�j,,,,,��4
i � lv Z�'[{ i°._ k
.t �'
I AGENDA ITEM SIIMMARY f�;
��' :#;
I �'�-�:. ,''�'`.i,
TO: Board of County Commissioners ;��' �: ;
Regular Meeting - June 28, 1995 . ,#i,. .
THRII: Suzanne Konchan, Community Development Directo i�����"��
�,
� ' `s;..i•'_.:Z',.
RE: Crystal Farms Special Review IIse Annual Review i:'.; '.'"
�4�
FROM: Tim Malloy, Deputy Director of Planning � ,j'. '
1._
�•�Y;:
_ �. � ��C���� �����_�� ��� �����_���_ �����5 :�,:_.' .
. _., _ ^3Ry� _:
INTRODIICTioN: The Board of County Commissioners granted a Special , �
Review Use Permit for the Crystal Farms Antler Furniture Factory �°:: a..�
,.;;;:,.,;, :
' in December of 1992 (see attached Resolution #�92-432) . This
i .approval also included a Lot Line Adjustment between the subject
� property and the adjacent property owned by Mr. Karl Hipp. -i�' '
Condition number 11 of the resolution of approval requires that the �'�'
antler furniture use be subject to the annual review requirements `Yq
in the Land Use Code. The condition also requires that annual ?
. review information be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners two weeks prior to the anniversary of the Board's
approval each year. �,�
•'�.
The anplicant submitted a letter in November of 1993 which was ••:�?
intended to fulfill the annual review requirement; however, no
` � documentation was provided to support the statements in the letter.
Staff contacted the applicant on several occasions in an attempt ��
to silicate additional information. The agplicant responded with '
some, but not all, of the information requested by Staff. The end
result was that the annual review for 1993 was never brought to the �r�
Board. '`�'."�
The applicant again submitted a letter in May of 1995 intending
to comply with the annual review requirement. This letter was
similarly incomplete. Staff has worked with Mr. Kent to get more
camplete information for this review. The May 1995 letter was ��
submitted in response to a letter from the County Zoning Official i
which was sent as a follow up to an enforcement action taken � ,
� against the applicant. This issue is discussed in the following
-- — paragraphs. �
'
Mr. Kent submitted a building permit application for a
garage/storage structure on March 30th of this year (permit j
- application ,�5-115). While this permit was being processed, the
applicant went ahead with excavation and did not obtain the ,
necessary excavation permit. As a result, on April 6th, the ;-� .
applicant was cited for excavating without a permit. The excavation
was done in the area where the garage is intended to be located;
however, the applicant argues that they were in part excavating to
remove a tree which was near the house and in poor health. Eric ��y .
; Peltonen, the Building Department official who delivered the "red y}
� tag" on the excavation violation indicated that there was in fact �?` �';
,, ..,<:t`r
. .,. � � , 'I c
I� i �, t'',
� �'
��
- - --( - - -- ---- - ,� r� ;
/ . � . .. � . . . . . ' ' . � ��.J
. � . _ - ... '� • . . . ' -. ��+ .
. . ' . ' . . � . . " . , .1 1�'
�C
. � . . . . _... t�� J
; t
♦
�
, , .'. ' �. `, .: ' ` . . �..
". . � � .�- 1 �.. . . . ... : . . .�...-. �.�. . . . . .. . . .5:,� ''�...
� . . _ . . , . . . ,,,��' _ �. . . .
� . . .. . . � .. , � . . . . . . .
.��\ 1 .� .. , . : .' . . . . i;:`i':f ' . . � . . . .
. . _ . .. . . , . �. . . . . . . . ,
,. . . . . .. �. : .... . , . .. , � � . . . ` _ .
. _.. _._..._ .._r_.. ,_. . .�_�. .C'�.,-_ . . . . � .
-x�. ; . . .. . . : _.. . . _ "._.__ . .. . . � ,. ..._ -. . ' .' .
� �fi�'� �. ._ � , � � _ � � . � . . � . � . .
�
a�• .
_.� - - ,
. , ... .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . . � . . �, ' '. �""db�,�'.
.�3a.", _ . _..��....,o�cr�l+r.laa•.:.r t6uV00.'L�AtsYie�tflyl+iai&�.LF�"�''.C.'R
,. ,.,•r••,!-�� ti`.
� � � 1
i �.
; uq
� ��. ,
� {�
'I �:� ;�'��
a large tree which had been removed and was still on site when he '"�
delivered the citation. The applicant has ceased work on the �� ;,-���
� excavation area, though Staff received a complaint that some work
� had been done after the "red tag�� was issued. � .''��'��
� y.:l.?''.-•
. _.. 7 � .,�`i:f`.tj
The building permit for the garage was subsequently rejected for �;4;,. ,;
several reasons which are identified in a letter from the County x.-
Zoning Officer dated April z7, 1995 (attached). Staff is working �j�.�;:_;. .1,
'with the applicant to address these issues. .�F�
Among the reasons identified by Joanna schaffner for rejeotion of ��a:-���-:'%
__ __ the building permit, was the fact that the annual review had not � �
been done. Joanna also noted that the proposed garage construction ''- ,�;�'
imust be reviewed for 1041 environmental hazard concerns, since this
I property is not located in an approved subdivision. She notes that ',
the property is encumbered by steep slopes and low wildfire hazard.
Staff has inspected the excavation site and would note that while F:��
wildfire is not an issue in this are of the property, the slopes :.7°f
in the area of the excavation appear to exceed 30 percent in grade.
Staff is currently working with the applicant regarding the 1041
environmental hazard issues. The applicant may have to return to
the Board for consideration of the slope hazard. '
One last note with respect to the garage issue, it would appear •�`�
� that a cansiderable amount of dirt has been removed from the site
as part of the garage excavation (there is little or no spoil
_ stockpiled on the site) . Staff does not know where this dirt has ��
been deposited or whether a permit would be necessary for the area
which is being filled with this material.
�.;,.
APPLICANT: Steve Kent Y .'
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Steve Kent
� LOCATION: The property is known as Tracts 8 and 9 of the Redstone
Ranch Acres subdivision located in Section 29, Township lo South, �:`
Range 88 West of the 6th Princi�al Meridian.
REFSRRAL AGENCIES: This application has been referred to the ��
Environmental Health Department, County Attorney, Housing Office, �
__'�.__` and Zoning Division. The comments of these agencies (except for
` County Attorney) are summarized below. Their referral memos have '
been attached for reference. `i
Environmental Health Deuartment ,
, . . �.- ,
The resolution of approval included two issues which were to be '
followed up on with the Environmental Health Department. Condition �
�1 of the resolution required the applicant to resolve outstanding ��,�
issues regarding the on-site septic system on the property. An
enqineered septic system was installed on the property and was '�
approved by the EHD on October 18, 1993. Condition ,�5 in the �'',,
2 . � I•..__,
=:,
I{•;
' � ��
� ii
1�+ i
j . 1 S
� !:����
_ - �..�..:.�.�.W.�...._.__-��;� ,
i--_ �
, �. . � ,;-
, . _ ; - . , ,
.. � :
` � ' �= � . 4
' . ' .
l � ' "
, • .•. .: . . , • � • . _
• �. . ;� .:_,, . . _
�: , , �•
,���� . , .
.� .
r�
•:�;r-. . " , .•
. � � `it��#�x:'_�d,5'.',�,:�:v
��}
.`'
4 `'.
resolution requires all noise complaints to be resolved pursuant ��`;����'�Sl
� to the noise regulations administered by the EHD. No noise �
_7;`'-�:.
� complaints have been received regarding the antler factory use. � �M,,. -;,
� {
� Housina Office j `'•,�'s
I � '��'.�...I�i
Condition �2 in the resolution of approval limits" the number `• '''
::'4 :.:. .�
employees on the site to a maximum of 6 full time equivalents I s't -
' FTE . These 6 ersons include a � �
� � ) P pprentices, students and all ; �;
employees. The applicant provided a letter from Dalby, Welland &
Ca., the firnt which, until recently, handled all of the accounting "':;f��-,�=�". "
_ and payroll for Crystal Farms. This letter attests to the number � x �:.,� `.;
of employees who worked for Crystal Farms between February 1993 and ,
February. 1994. The applicant also provided a report prepared by � �;�7r��.;
Julie Pelland, the current in-house bookkeeper for Crystal Farms, ; �`��, ;
� showing the hours worked by each employee for both 1993 and 1994. ,� -
i These documents indicate that the number of employees has not 'y��� ��
' exceeded that which is allowed under the special use approval. �,.
_ I �.:r��?
Zonina Division ; ��
�
• Joanna notes that two complaints were received regarding Crystal � �;�',, 4
Farnts duTing the 1993 season. One alleges that more than the i '�'�
permitted number of employees work on the site, and the other ;'�
states that the hours of operation were extended beyond that which
is permitted (Monday through Friday 7:30am to 5:3opm as identified �
in Condition ,�4 of Resolution 92-432) . These complaints have not e
been verified. Joanna also notes that the address of the subject
property (is Antelope Drive) is used in advertisements for the
( Antler Factory. Condition #6 of the resolution of approval ;
specifically prohibits on site sale of wares. ' • "�
`;�>it
STAFF COMMENTB:
After reviewing the information, Staff finds that the conditions
� associated with the special use permit for the Crystal Farms Antler
_ Furniture Factory have generally been complied with. The following ~ �'y'
- is a brief summary of compliance with the conditions of approval `
as identified in Resolution 92-432. i +1•
`�, Condition #1: The applicant has complied with the provisions of i� '.,�
this condition as 'discussed in the memo from the Environmental
Health Department. Staff would note that the septic system issue ��
was not resolved within the 120 day time period required in the
Resolution. '+
Condition #2: The Housing Office has indicated that they are . � .
satisfied that this condition has been met by the applicant. Staff '
- .would note that a complaint was received in 1993 alleging that this - •�s
condition was violated; however, no concrete evidence has been � �;
provided to support this complaint. The applicant has provided
letters from both the former accountant and the current bookkeeper �=1
� �,
.
� 3 , __
YI 1'.
� `''
JF� �
,�--- -, -'' � '- -- ------ - -....�..��_.��+.->�...�..-,-- �a
�w �
. ���.
�S�F:
�•. / . " .,� . _ � '� _',: ' . . . . .
� t
.. . � ' . _ . . � .� . . �.� F.
. . � . � -. .. }�S��� '�' f
� ��� ♦
l �
. , I . . . . ` . _
,,
. , ��� . �'. .- ti
� �'.'. `.� .'�.', 1� . . . . '.. . ,'. �.�.,.. .... .,,{ _...
' . � - _.. . . � . . .. ...r . . . � .
:\ . '�,. . . . . � -'. -�•t.• _ ..' .. . � - ... �
i
... , �' .:�,' �. ' .. , . � � � . . . . .
.
�.' � .. .. .. .. . : �.. . . . .. , . � '
. .
� . � ..' ".-_." �f'- . - ��-- .. •!..� . . -.:� . . '.� � . . ..
. . � �: . .. .. _ - ' .. .. . . .. .. � .. �, '
'�s�kr''r . _
,:f, . . •
;�
�:: � ' , "
,� � m � . �� . . . , .. ...n�.�r._.ud..- _i:1i7u:rW.u��:.tr�'aSU4n�.KiaM1X+i13[.:.-3 -.I" J v..
. ... .. . .�..... . ,_ . . t �I'.
• ' yyi,� ; n.;
F
, �:,
; '�.f: ��
•�- y r'" .t�ii�
which would suggest that the number of employees has remained
_l'� '-�:.
within that which is allowed. However, it is impossible for Staff ,••,
to state detinitively that no violation has occurred. '�'' '�> -
; y';•{. '!�,
i Condition �k3: Staff inspected the site on June 20, 1995 and found ��;.•;.��
� . ';..y�
{ nc materials or equipment, other than vehicles, being stored �?.�
1 outside. Generally, the property is very well maintained and ,c
appears very attractive from Highway 133. �' €-
�
i:.=�::_'-- -',
Condition �4: Staff received one complaint during 1993 that the : t � �
hours of operation had exceeded that which is permitted. Staff has
____:.: no infarmation to support or refute this claim. ��'�"
�'�" e�,�, r :
� • Condition �5: No noise complaints have been received regarding the �� � "
! Antler Factory use. ��•� ; -:.
I�,:;,c,
Condition �6: This condition prohibits on-site sales. Staff has �;?s ,
attached a copy of an advertisement which lists the address of the I��r�'77.
i subject property. Staff would also note that the applicant closed �•�
� � the retail store which they had previously maintained in Aspen. The �` `
applicant indicates that they do most of their business by phone ��
� and mail and that there is also an antique shop in Aspen which ':'`" .
�
displays their furniture. They maintain that they do not conduct -
on-site sales.
Condition #7: This aondition requires further review if the 4,200
• square foot barn (the structure within which the furniture assembly �r
is done} is to be expanded, or if there is any change in use on the !
property. As discussed previously, the applicant wishes to
construct a garage/storage structure on the property, near the •��'
house. Mr. Kent indicates that this structure is intended for 5`.;i,'`'�
storage of his personal vehicles and other personal items not
associated with the business. It is Staff`s opinion that this s
_ structure does not constitute a change or expansion of the antler �
factory. The proposed structure is located on the other side of the
property fram the barn which houses the furniture assembly t,
business. While there are currently several other accessory
structures on the property, there is no structure which serves as y;
a garage £or the storage of private vehicles. '
� �p
"'�. Condition �8: This condition has been comglied with (see attached
resolution of the Board of Adjustment) . �'
Condition #9: This condition has been complied with (see attached o�
building permit for the barn) .
� . Condition #10: The applicant agrees to comply with this condition. �
Condition #11: See discussion under "Background" in this memo. '�r`'
�k�
+ Condition #12: This condition has been complied with. r{ ,4'
-� �b.'
i ,
4 j
` i f�
i
i ►�Y.�
� ;�
� _ ��`y' � '
� / V '
��� ��
r
. ��:. . . . , y..;.
y : � y :
.. � :
-. , ;
.
. .. � � . . ' � , � •I 4
\ . - . . � . . "--.. - 1 1:
. ;. ' . . . . .. � .. � .. . .
,` . � . . - . . . . . .. . � .. . -� . . . . . . .•
•. \ I ' . � - - � � . � �- . . � . .. � � . .
l
._ . -. . . � . ,. ...�- �. . . ::�... .�. .. . '.. . . , . . . . . . . . ! .
. . . �. . . .. �. .�..J . . :. . . . . ,- , . . . ..
� ' � ,_ .�..�.., -. . . __ '"' '.".. . _( _y� -: . '.:... . . . . � .
. . -.Y._. . .. . .. .
�� .. � . . . ; .. . . � . . .. . . ... . . . � ' , �
' ���� . . . . . '
��
, .
,�": � _ _
. . d�....r.,.. � � w
.�.. _._... . _ ._ ...... . � •t.;.;¢:'•"'r'�'y'r:".
3�"^��'j: y':
'r
� �'' y`<'
� Condition �13: A certificate of occupancy was issued for the barn '_7'. ''s•::,�
in May of 1995. This was not done within the required 120 da '`'�
y :�;�, :�•
eriod. ' �'
P • +,'r�";.�..;1� .
i
Candition #14: The lot line adjustment plat has been prepared; + �'' ir,
however, it has not been signed by the other affected property ,c
owner (Mr. Hipp). Apparently the relationship between Mr. Kent and �)'� .=
Mr. Hipp is strained and obtaining Mr. Hipp's signature may take � :,,s},;.; ��i.
some time. The applicant's attorney hopes to have the Plat ready � y '
for recording within two weeks. Staff has reviewed the Plat and,
other than the missing siqnature, it appears to be acceptable for ;s.rx.x. :
I recording. Staff would note that there was no time frame placed on t,�' ..
1 tha recording of this dacument in the resolution of approval. Staff �i ;•,,''�,`,
would zecommend that no further building permits be issued for i
�� Crystal Farms until this plat has been recorded. f
� a
. � Staff finds that with the exception of the Lot Line Adjustment �
! Plat, the applicant has generally complied with the conditions ��
� identified ih Resolution 92-432. �
R8COI�SENDATION: Staff recommends that Crystal Farms continue to �
submit ann�xal review reports to the Community Development ''
�
Department. Staff does not feel it is neceseary to bring these
reports to the Board.everg year. Rather, the Community Development "��''
Department will schedule a review before the Board if it is
determined that a violation of the conditions ot approval has
occurred or if the Board's specifically requests such a review. �'
ATTACHMENT3: ;-�
1�-,.. RESOLUTION �92-432 �� �
1. IRONMENTAI, HEALTH DEP NT MEMO
2. HOUS OFFICE MEMO
3. ZONING DI O W/ATTACHMENT
4. APRIL 27 95 C ER FROM JOANNA SCHAFFNER RE: BUILDING � �i
p EJECTION
5. �TTER FROM STEVE RENT W/ATTACHMEN ' - �
ais crystalfa�aaaual �b T .�NCLI-t_YJ£() w ��''� X/tl/�3/T ,
� .�.
� i�
� ,
,
_ t?.,
_,.:,
:. , ��-;
:� ,.
: :� i J : 1 `
� t 1'
,s
. , . . � . . . � . . r i.
. . , . . � . �, �.1 },.
� - � . . � .. . . . � f i i�.
��
...-..---r--:— - �}�! 1
;� = l ��
-- . _ � � _,
_ r Fi ,
. .. . `; ,r � ��� +`
, .� y i
l ,T'' _
� �, � �`
;
� � •.
.r �
y,� . . . ,
. . . . �-- - _
• . . � � i. , .
.
�: , _ . . . : ,
��k'�" : _ _ • .
, �
^ .
.,,�. _ . .-. ,
..�,;;
,� , _....____�._..��4�,-,k'�'I,'
. ,� y ` Q� � � `
'r'"
� 5 � , G- �'6" <� � �. �;
.� --_ -�"���-���. � "' .
;'�Y ;"�L > •"' �. 9.� MAY o .
� , _ �y,• ,E�,,.�� � ��S 9 .:.
� __ ���� e41+L �b�- � ,3'�. 19� � =.,. .,
� -. �l �I ��-�,r.. :; ;�.
° .�+� �' ��I�JL � I Ccv:tc"'+,r,• �
,.. 's °� � �. 9�' Y"�FNT / j''�,:i.
- � . .�.t,�p��. .�r ,,,,, AFN/t''1�'i�r' F i, -f•
�':w.ti... � ,
• _ �.--^' "1� °' May 23. 1995 `�_ �j:
,.�.':,+
��
Community Development
.Y,,:.;„�,-:
Attn: Tiat Malloy �-x- y.
= 130 S. Galena 3,i .,
Aspen, Co 81611 ,,"""�
Dear Mr. Malloy, � ,"
- a.
This letter is in response to the Annual Review of the Crystal Farm Special .
Review Use Permit, Resolution No. 92-432. �'
• :ti ,
' • 1. 'COmpleted and approved by the Environmental Health Department. ��.
�.
` 2. Crystal Farm cunently has £our (4) full time eauivalent employees. This
is less than the number allowed by the resolution. This is a temporary
situation as the number will be increased to six'(6) as the seasonal work �
load increases. ,
3. There is no outside storage of business related equipment or material
exposed to public view. _
4. Crystal Farm does not operate commercially, except between 7:30am - 5:30pm
durinq the rrork week. � -
: 5. There have been no know noise complaints.
- 6_ Only assembly and storage take place at Crystal Fazm. There is no retail
sales outlet at the Redstone location. Crystal Faxm is represented by a •
_ retail store (38 Antiques) ia the Aspen area. This store is in Aspen.
7. No changes have taken place.
8. Approved. )1
9. Complied with in full. � '• �
-�.. : 10. App=oved. S
--�:— 11- Coc�plYing at this time. .• _ ��
�'i
12. Complied with. . "�
I3. Complied with. �. j
14. Complied with. (in process) ■
If you shouid need additional information please contact us. i _
SincGrel•:, } � �I
y �
� • .�'. .—.L/��� ' , z .
L � ' �'-�r
. •���� '�
� �,!
Stephen C. Kent i.�
. - �i � :
� 18ANTELOPE DRIVE � REDSTONE,WLORADO 81623 � PHONE:(303) 963-2350 1 FAX:(303j 9B3-0709 �
. . � . ,,3,�,?�.,�'.<.
l _ - .r�.. .,,�::_;;;,,��, •��.,..,..,.:`: t��e
i �b
`, . � ` �. ' � . k 1
�. • �'� � .:�� �..
.. ,.� '%.. '.�.� .'.' .... ' ' .. ..._ .. • ��� �. .,'' , � _.� , y.Sh�.`
, �i
�1� \
_, / `
\.. +'
�: � -.,
. � ♦ . ...+'�. . � . .
.i.. f _ � �: ..,. . . . • .
\ � .;. ' �� . . . . ..- � : .
.., .. , .. . .. : � .
1 ,: :� .... :. ; �.,-. ' .. ; ',
. . ' . " .. : . ..� . .
..,. . . ,_�.. .:��.. � �� i:�� ` . �� t.-,�i-.. ' � . .. .... -
� . ,.._�.. ._..: '._.- . . ..:_..- ..�.
. .�. . .. .. . . �,,.. � ' '
. . . ..' __. -.:�...,. ' '" '' , . ,.- .'��. .. . .�. . ..-.
'F
. :5T/" ' . . �. ' � � .. � , �
' � ..,."�. - . � . ' � . � . . . � ' . . � .
`}�. ,
, _
�`` � � �
,
_ __._ _ _.._._. ,..,, _ ,,.._,.�.. . .
._._..._.... . ... .. r.tr,y4,; �•;'�.s5;,tr,�-E.:an>i:t'�3�+u�_,.:pfr'txwaan� , '�+"rF
� � va
G
• � G-z8.4 �
� ' .
{' :,�. .
. •t�1
� �';! _
DALBY,WENDLAND&CO.,P.C. � t:.
_. -...__ -.... �......,,_...�. �.. ... _.,.�....�.... � �r s:
:.� ,�
Febcuary 10, 1994 r'`,a .
�
.__ � � . . � . .� . . . �.- . .°.�x
. .. . �.�� .,�:
Mr.Tim Malloy =� i � _,:`',�,�
Aspen Planning Office „t �
130 South Galena -- –-•- =
Aspen,CO 81611 --- --- ';a ;
'�!':..
Deaz Mr.Malloy - �;�:
Re: ';�:
r'.�
The following is a complete list of Crystal Farm Antler Chandelier,on site—Crystal Farm a`�
Studio, employees. These employees have worked at the Farm during the past twelve
months.
�;,°t ' The list is as follows:
�
Deborah L.Bethell Dawn Prausa
Jarnes Powers Julia Pelland
Chaziie Liggitt(no lonaer employer as of 11/93)
There are a wtal of four employees currently worldng at the Antler Chandelier Studio in 'h�..
` Redstone. 'r
r ;.
Thank you and if we can be of further assistance or you should need additional inforination, �,
� please let us lrnow. �
. ,;;
- Sincerely,
. ,i
DALBY,WENDLAND&CO.,P.C.
' . . � . . .. : .. � L' l 1
. . � . . - .. . ..
7. H.Ncennig,CPA ,-:�.
� .M.
JHN/eas � -
:, "�;j
� � c'� , �i+
.. � _ . . ' .. . �� S al'
i �
B17 Caoaem Avenua/PO Box 1150/Gcu+woon Sertumy,CO 81602-1160/�xc�soNC 809/845-8675/r.a 903N46�9236 �� , Y� �'
+ �
- r'—.'�- -- - '�t..
;\ i - ,!..
h•
j , ��`4 +
. 1 f> ,,° '` � ` .�� _ +�C
.. : .,,. t�,, ..� :' -
.
.
...� :. :.�� . ,.: -:�: .�. ��.r' r
i
-� � •:.l t .f F
. .�� 1 �� i 7 � '
�, .L F�� i� .
,, ! . .
� „�_ �' _ s �;F. - ..
"- �
�. �
•. , .
,
y�•�,�. • >. . .. . . _ . . �. .: �
. "�R � - . . � . . - � .
. . . . . . , a . . .
_ ;T.�•.. , . . . . . � .
. �. ..
. ,
�.. ,
�
�., _.._�. ._. ..
_ . __. . :« ,.:�.,...,K.,,
_. . _ �. ,, _... :...�.._.,. �:.�:�.��.�;:�;:::,�.-�,�• ,�,
4
' � . . ` . . . � .i�"�.a.7.� ` .
`+ i +�.
���Y_ '�$SV ;��� S �J���J��� �� • . .•� . � .. ILi Zg-+� .,^
y�� 1 'iJ��l�lQ'sV�;�5.i � J .+�,
�j��. ,J f"��1 �� +t'r•`�`r � . .F��:. ;•:., i�
' � �I �����;:.�. �j� � ��,� :
� ��t��� ,n •y�,�, � f ?, • • • . �t: ».. >
5��..�-xy..l.i. ���Ll�l� �' ir �'.1
` �,'.�_1��.,�'i'' t j,CF I I � � � � . - � ii;"I '�''r�
I ^ �•sa �
_ •� _ �5�e.'.-"r�;l�.�w,. .u:�. ,,�ti
i _ ,;;,ti•.�.,,�. 1' �t
-�--"' • )y� s.
�� a
i v� i
� . .�I � .. . � . . . . . ..� . � it`� -
. . - . . . . . 5.�
_ _ Y ''�'
p
May 10, 1995 � '�
I . ��
� :a ..
lTotal Crystal Farm Antler Chandeliers Emnloveesc 'Y�:.
� �` ,�.
�:
IInployee Eiours 1993 Hours 1994 .,q
i.
Sames Powers 1756.58 1815.30 ''`
� . . . -� - I ,ii}
Detwrah Bethell 1987.00 1911.20 ;
- Julia Pelland 1897.00 1786.38 ;�
. �
Dawn Prausa 2080.00 2008.64
� �,�
�.
These figures are based on a 52 week year. This shows that no one worked �
over 40 hours a week. �
. ?
This demonstrates that Por the yeazs 1993 and 1994 Crystal Farm employed ~ �'
`" four full time employees_ �-. �
,
�. . � �
_ ' r% :
c�/'V(.� �GG^�.
�
'— �Julie Pelland
/Bookkeeper i ,
! , i
. �I
��
. . . . . . . . � :E.:�.
. . . . . � , � - . . . . . . �
_ . . . . . . � _ . . � . . . . . i.._r
- . . . . . . . . .. . ' . � � . . - .. .�- , . �'.
� . � �- . .. � . � . � . . . . � . � [; c.
:� � . � ..� � , � � . - . . . .� l;,, I._r
. 18 ANTELOF£DRIVE 1 REDSTONE,COLORADO 81623 1 PHONE:(303) 963-2350 1 FAX;(303� 963-0709 � �'�
��� . . — -�r;�.? ...,.�----'•.:t-. •- ,.., , . - . - - - /1
�.�,? I�
'\(��{.�i,
` i%y y�
. .. . r . - � !f¢jA yi.
-a ri e i .�f , ���1
i.Nil .t jea. v✓� �� �> .j'.! �M1.
� f� : s'
. } . - : :
� �,� . }
• . * ; ` ,: ,: , �<
� � h � �: - . . :r r
.
.
::.
..;
l
� i ' � ' r.
1 �t �J - 1 �� i .
l J,
�s` S � _ �� � ..
.. � � `�. . � .
�� .., .. , . . . . . . . . . • •
,'� •
:l�
,_M, .. ..
�;.., ..,._ . _ . ._ . _ ___ __._ ., .. _ <.•r,;,�
, _ _ l��S .��K�;:
� . �- ��.��. :.
JEROME GAMBA&ASSOCIATES, INC. -- ''
�a
CONSULTING ENGINEEA3 k LANO SURVEYORS " ':�-:`.
J, ���: --,::
��.
n�vtnsraeer.suireai. ' ��=;-.,. •
� P.0.20%1�SB P.0.80X�BOB . p;.:.,;-,{,..
GLENw0005PHINGS,COLOM00 81602-Ie59 � PAGOSASPHpJG$CO10�00 8fi57 . `',�i•��
� PNONE:;�I9�S2550 FAX:(70719�S1t10 PMONE:f70�771371J fAX:iJ071TJ1-177L � � Sy.•_� .y'.
September 13, 1993 t,s "'"
�,x
� . � �":r '`
�� . . . .. tj .ij.
Nancy MacKenzie ,"��• �
--j� Pitkin County Environmental Health Department ,�-� < r.
130 South Galena Street `;y
� I Asgen,Colorado 81611 . ��d"' .
I k
Re:Kent Waste Water Treatment " � ':
_ �::a
Dear Nancy: f,,;�3;' .
5� .., .�.:
The Kent waste water treatment system was installed in accordance with the plans and ����-
� � ' specifications dated August 20, 1993,and submitted to your office for approval_ • -
As per our telephone conversation the revised design calculadon assumed that there would be i �•'•'''
8 full time people using the facilities with an avenge daily use of 27 gpd. By copy of this t `
_ letter we recommend that the Kents avoid the disposing of any paints or cleaning chenucals � �;
through the domestic waste water treatment system. These products may damage the leach t
field or cause ground water contaaunation. �
'i
� �+�
If you have any questions,please call our Glenwood Springs Office at 945-2550. I `A. '
5.i
SiI1CeCCly, � � � . . . � - - .
I Jerome Gamba& Associates,Inc- : I :� ,.�,
�
- i.
��atnul� r� '7.�.�_nc.�•aC���'i
,,►� Thomas A.Zancanella P.E. _
._ . . _ ' i�
_ �- ;
cc: Steve Kent ; '�:
us�r�z ,
� ' .
�
I ���� ,�:.
. h ,
� . .. . .� . .. . .. I��. '4.'.
I . . - . . � . . . . �. . . � . . . . � ��•
�.� . ' . . . �.. . � . . . . . . - � �. . � . �'� �i
�'� � . � � . - .. ..� �. � . ', .' .
� ':'. . . . . . . .. . � . . . I b� ,
; ' 1�:
.i . . . � . . . � � � � . . � �( 1
� '� �
. _ _ �
_ --,T - --� ��ti� k���.
��� �� � _ - y���
-; - :� ��:
' ► '�t� y�F . ,
,:, � _ . - i;�} ,
� � � , . �t � t .
1 , �> —
{ � ; �.t � '��.�� �T
1. + ', .
k� ��
1--
. t�y y - ..:}_{•- -- ' ' . .
�
. •
.. .. �� _� <„r—r .... . �. �
� �� .Y� �. __- . .
.�. . . ' . � �� . . � . � . . . • . . . .. •
�� . ,
._.... � -�--'�----•._._. �� r ���y..
: � k
��.
. r }-� �-Z9-�5 �-;.
. � ? . ���� t�X.S'i
��,�}'..
� r�toxaxnQtt �,.�..
�t•,� -�;
>r... ;;
To: Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners ; "��' �
r'i'�.:�'"'
i Reqular Meeting - June 28, 1995 �:r ;,:yJy
1'i . .
TffitII: Suzanne Konchan, Community Development Director" ��}x'��'
�-'-v •, , - "
� ,;S..:. . ,�.
FROM: Tim Malloy, Deputy Director of Planning �:>-;a=;�• �
� ;:
-- " RE: Mines Takinqs Determination Hearing ,tn.,r
-----------------^°----------------------------------------------- �`°'•^`.�.:�
. `� ,,, ,`.•.
s.�:::�.. .
REQIIEBT: The Applicant has requested a "Takings Detesmination ��'��' `
Hearing" pursuant to Section 3-28 of the Pitkin County Land Use �I
�:.3.
Code. This request has been made as a result of the 8oard's April
, 12th denial of the Mines application for 1041 Environmental Hazard �:�'�
Review and General Submission (see attached resolution) . s .
BACRGROUND: On April 26, 1995 (within the required 15 day period) "��:
the applicant submitted a written request for a takings �..�
determination. The applicant's letter of request includes the
information required by Section 5-22 in the Code (submission
requirements) . Section 4-1502 of the Code requires that the Board
� conduct a hearing within 15 days of the receipt of the written
request. The Board opened the hearing on this matter on May lo, ,!''
1995 (within the required 15 day period) and, with the consent oE
the applicant, continued the hearinq to the June ZSth regular '"
meeting, r:,•'�
.�.
Staff has included a co �
py of the original staff report regardinq
• this application for reference.
APPLICANT: Thomas Mines
,�,.
APPLICANT'3 AEPRE3ENTATIVE: Srooke Peterson and Jim Colombo
r :.
LOCATION: In the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Capitol
_A% Creek and Snowmass Creek Road. t
ZONING: The property is zoned RS-30 and is approximately 1.98 acres ��
in size.
' STAFF CO1+IISENTB: The standard for review of a taking is identified
in Section 3-2802 of the Code and reads as follows: �.' •
�
� "The Board shall determine whether the property owner will be
deaied all reasonable use aad economic return ott the property �
as a result of the questioned determination. If the Hoard °'�
determines that a takinqs has or may occur, it should take o.;.:�
°.;.` -�_r
:. 1 � ' l�a
:, !h
','.
---- - - - � .'
1
. - �' ---- — . v.�r.�s,c:.e+w�.w;�r,F;i`�r� i
�>.r.,_- �!�7 ci
I1�„''� t
i�' � . . : � �. . t:.A�r .
y
��
- -� �, ,
_ , +
, �: �
+
� �'�
1 � �, �f ,
_. _ :�_. . � �
�: , ; . � .
t��:�.,� - - _ , .
. � .
;�"'' ' '
. . " `_ ��,,,,�.,,.,
`�i4�'��:,,I..Lti;',
rF.:�K.
:�; �
L �'�
�Tia h1
such action as it deema appropriate to remedy the situation. • ?y��;
+ In making . its decision, the Hoard shali consider the ?��.f'.�:_�.:
� benefiaial uses trhich remaib in the property notwithstanding . '
the challeaqed determination and shall give due consideration ���'' �`'�
__� to the reasoaable iavestmeat-backed expectations ot the �`;���-�'1
landowaer". y,•`�:� �-
�;!: .
>.�,
etaff Resaonse• � � +
. j ,
S i.
The applicant argues that the 2ocati.on proposed for develogment in !'
the application is the only suitable site for development on the � ( °
__ property. Further, the applicant contends that the Board's denial �'
of t:e a lication the �� '""� �
p p ( q u e s t i o n e d d e t e r m i na tion) has a dverse:.y �',i t f
affected" the applicant's ability to utilize the property for �' s�s.. :
single-�amily residential and related usage, ��
It is StafP�s o pinion that the Board�s denial o f t h e M i n e s 1 0 4 1 a n d '�y_�
General Submission application does not constitute denial of all �,�;
reasonable use and economic return from the subject property. In f �
support of this position, Staff would offer the following comments: �'`
. . �' .
1. The applicant has not demonstrated that the proposed location �`:.�_
is the only viable development site on the property. There �"'��°
are, in fact, several other options for development on this
s �
property. , �z
- one alternative which could be explored would be to locate a
small residence in the northwest corner of the subject
propezty. There is a level spot in this area (within the
setbacks), which is roughly 30 feet by 50 feet in size. Staff
would note that there is no reasonable on-site access to this "
plateau due to the steep slopes on the subject property; 1;��±�
however, it may he possible to obtain an access easement from `
. an adjoining property owners(s) to access this portion of the
site. If access could be obtained, this area could be
developed without any encroachment into the wetland area,
without the need for a setback variance, and with minimal r !�
visual impact on the adjacent public roads. The applicant has
ofPered no information to refute the development potential
for this portion of the property. .
...Y�:. . . 4 .
i
Another alternative wou2d he to develop a small home in the
location of the access drive on the north side of Capitol
Creek. In this case, the structure would have to be relatively
narrow (20 to 30 feet wide) . This scenario would also �
� . . eliminate any need for a setback variance and could avoid
wetland encroachment aitogether. However, this site is south . � .
facing and would also enjoy close proximity to the adjacent '
creek. The primary obstacle to this alternative is the
existing driveway which serves the adjacent properties to the ��`
' west. Staff has been provided no information to show that
� these adjacent residences could not be accessed another way. r
_j� 1�--�
Z 1
� �r, �
i i,
�
� y;�
c �
. �---- —_—_.._._--- . +4
.� . . . _...__._ .._..�—.�.,.`�,..:�.�,.�
. . I . ---- � - �. . � .l � i I
/ �vLy
f 'sai}7
. :-. - : ��`` -
. - . � � � . . . . . . � . . y y:
- �. ��� ' . � . . . . . � ' .� . .. . �tt
,
` . . . ,.• . . �..- � � . . . . .. � � �14' �
i � . . . � . � . - � � .:.� _ . . � .. . . . '
...� 1 . .. � � . . . - . �. � . � � � - . -. � - . .
. . . . , , � . . � . . . . .. ,
. . . _,. _ .. , . _. . .
�: . . . . . . .. . . - . � . . . �_. . �. .._. . .. � � , .
. `�-�y.vl: . _ . . .
t•f
4
:✓f• ' •
^��. .
,�.i.:;; • ^ .
- ._..�. �..__.....�......,,,.,._ . :..r,;,.,..•i�,,�,; k.r'
�;::
� k
� `�•.
� .��`; �t
! A third alternative, and one which responds to the constraint '7` �
identified for option number two above (driveway) , would be `#`' �'� -
to develop a house which cantilevers over the driveway. This �''�;-�'�
is essentially what the applicant proposed in the original ? .�''�'',�:y,r
application, except the house was to be cantilevered over the
designated wetland. This scenario would involve disturbance �'�-' �
of at least some small areas of stee slo es. Since the slo es ' ��;. •
P A p � .:,;:r:". .�;
in this area of the site are greater that 30 percent, an
application for development under this alternative would be � ,.�. :,;,."
_ _ subject to the same review process (denial with option for �;i ,x
takings determination hearing) as the applicant�s preferred ,�.'x *
proposal. Staff would argue that minor disturbance of the � `+. _
steep slopes to accomatodate this aJ.ternative is preferable to �� `
the applicant's proposal. The reason for this is that the F."�'%;;•. r
impacts associated with slope disturbance are less onerous and E �s;' �;
more mitigable and because Staff's alternative would also <<�i,�`.. �
avoid the need for setback variance and would have '�'�'7
significantly less visual impact from the adjacent public �,�^� ;..
roads. �. .,_
• i�'%;
A final alternative for this property, which would at least i;,"�•'��
minimize visual impacts and environmental damaqe associated �.
with encroachment into the wetland area, would be to develop
a smaller home in the location proposed by the applicant. , '
_ , Staff wi21 not, at this time, speculate as to what size home �
would be appropriate, since this would require an analysis
based on the number of bedrooms and the resulting septic
system requirements. Further, Staff does not feel it is
appropriate to design the site for the applicant. The �•
applicant argues that the house size proposed (3,800 square �'%4'I�
' feet not including the garage) is the minimum necessary for �
him to realize a reasonable return from his investment. Staff
would note that the applicant has provided no information to ?
support this contention. Further, given the price for which
_ the applicant purchased this property in 1994 ($77,000), Staff '+ `�i•
would characteri2e this contention as seriously exaggerated. '
I `:.
2. With respect to the issue of economic return and investment
A backed expectation, Staff would note that the applicant ';
-- purchased this property with the know].edge that its
development was subject to land use approvals from the County, �
the final outcome of which was questionable (the applicant was
aware that the Pitkin County Land Use Code prohibited ��
, , development within wetlands areas and on slopes greater than
30 percent and that the vast majority of the property was. � ' •
encumbered by one or the other of these hazards) . Staff would ''
- argue .that the price paid for this property ($77,000)
reflected its extremely limited development potential. ���'
In addition, Staff has no knowledge as to whether the �+S
applicant might not receive some income from the access ��
� -
,�i s . I .-
_ .
� � `
, , �
IY
I I t1 '
�
' .....__'...�J.. � _ .._ �� �
� - --�...r+.._..._- _ .__- _ ...._.---_...� ._..+,-.--_-..-`-.�-.-...... �....... ��,y �y1
— --�...._._.�. �,f s t
; � - . , �t µ
- , �:
� - ,I. ,
,ti �. -- �1 �,.
... .
. . , _. _ ... .
, . ..
_ ;,.;,�:r`�
'� , , -
_ - _ . � .
,. .
. _� _ .. _r_ ._ _ . .� �. _
!�: . _ : :
����
ry . �
�. . ,
r h "
ri. . .' - .� . .
r ' � y�
, �=�e.;.�.i�,.i..il�$s.a�Ii_':�1:.� .;..y.StCui� -:. �°✓-.. .'"�'.:_: ,a -.��. , ,,,,,— y� i A,l�i ���n;
n . „-.... _ . . . ..�-.... ...�_:...,.:.. .��_�....".�_... _ _�. _ .. .----... ___._ • p i�'.
. . . . � . . � . . . - �:.
r:.. , . ��
,� . `...
easement which has been qranted over this property for the ��t,• y�
benefit of the residences to the west. Staff would also argue •,;;;.,�,.
that there may be other uses (otrier than single-�amily '-".��;�
residential develo ment to which this °�` "'
p ) property could 'oe put F'-? �z
- that would 'generate some economic benefit. All of the �=c ::�."
applicants efforts have been focussed on an alternative which �*#"
seeks maxi.mum, not reasonable, economic return. '
f ;� j
. . . �,,,i .!
BINDING8: .,;w�....��,;`
' � -�
�=� Staff finds that the Board's denial of the Mines 1041/General ;Z�
Submission application (Case #P87-94) does not constitute a .',„''� ';
"t�cing" since there are several other development alternatives for
� this property which have not been explored and sinae the investment �;
� backed e3cpectation for this property reflected its extremely ";;a .`
limited development potentiaL
''�9.`
ATTACffi+lENTS: ' .� , .
1. `DRAFT RESOLUTION FINDING AGAINST TAKIN �— ,N����
2. PITK�N�COUNTY ASSESSORS R� '`
' 3. RESOL N OF D
4. APRIL 4, STAFF, MEMO AND ATTACHMENTS ' '�3
5. APRI , 199 FROM BROOKE PETERSON W/ATTACHMENTS FORM
6. 21, 1995 LETTER FROM B
- memo_minea_taking Jq7'r"/�C1fmE�'v�S ND� •���CbEp �'
I n €X/f1�3/T �
.-,.�;. .�1 `�"�
/ h ��.
. � �',"ri.��� � , � . . . � . . . � . .. + .
.. . . . . . I�r ��t�,
A �.
_ �;
, . . _ ,
: , _ � .
_ ,
�.,
�
� , ::�':
`+ +�-_�
� 4 � c:' �� -
: rj� � -
• _ i`'� �� �
. ,
, ��,
* ,v
;, � r.'+ .. ;�'�+ar
�1�� �� - �_ �-.c., a..
r 2 y'
. ,�-_ .� 1 +:`". `i.
' l: i ' .'{"F^� � �
� . % `
� �,}�`f c d . t .� . l�
t
L - p > �i
, ' � 4 �'"� '` _ ���: �' �
J � ' t yr.
}�� � '
S /
{ � � 4 ��.Si tl
, �1 ' �. ;y •, .
. _ .
. ;. `::
. .
.
,
:.
.
,'. . . : . . . : . -.
, �; ` ;
1'..�
- rf:
� z r;: � �� !% .
,,,r� ,' -` .,i�.S - � _.
�
. 7�� . .. .. ._ . . , . . � ' ' _
..tic.� � ' . ' � •
.�,;.' ' , , ..
• •• �JUN-Id-'�:1d IJd:al I- ue��d-r�t ^� 1 ,ui:r�°••.
' • c! -,.�i��i�`-.
��.'•:. � � .. w;.; �t�
�'.g f�OVE ��NSTFiUCTED W ETLANDS � �� �:
_ �..'�w �x t��
��,'Y.��
��° ' APril 11, 1995 ' _7���`-''=..,
— :�;'t•3"_r
Y,.' .�J.
�1 i _:..:,; �,-y''J
' )}'c.-
i +y �
: I �'
:: . . ! ._� ..7•� :"
r +
."'"__ .�,kY "..
� � r .
.,� j
. I�e..���•.':
� . . , �`.::�.�:. .
� � l¢�,t �
' 7.,1
...; � 1�:��r?
� om ines 7FtANSM!1!tU VIA FAX � i�_
Minas,Inc. �� �, '
;3 P.O.Box 3888 ' r':;�`?
£ Aspon,CO 81612 • . !�
�.... ,,
� RE:.Capitol C�eek Property(Section 34,Township IiS Range E6 W 6pm)PI(kin Caunty ` '
�� .
- � Dear Tom �,.,, �
� �
� For the purposes of your meeting Wetlnesday, let me clarlfy the current slatus of jurisdiclionel , �'
° wetiands and ihe indlvfdual sewege trealment system etfecting development of a single family -
� house on the above property: • ;;',i,�'`
` , ;
- a • Due to lhe uee of driven steel i-beems for lhe foundation footines;A aermit from the Armv
� Coros of Enatneers fs'not requlred under section 4Q4 ot ihe Clesn Water Act. 7his means � .
� that construCtlon of the home on driven piers is not regulaied, and die piers are nol �- •
, .�;,
considered in the amount of flll being requesled under general permit#18.
• Michaet Ciaffay(CQE)hes Initlated the pre-discharge rtotificatian process to authorfze the
limilad tll(<25 yds3)oi watlands along the toe o1 the existing slope. This�ermit mav nol
� ptova necesearv as we have desis�ned a constructed weAand treatment svstem which wauld i ��
• avoid lurisdictional wettend imaacts entirelv.� However,the placement of fiN may ba neaded �
in order to accommodate fhe standard slopes required by Ihe conventlonal"beck-up syslem" ,'
{designed by MGaughiin Water Engineefs}should this alternative be preferred.
, " As ataied in the letter of Aprii 5, 1995, the CQE supports the altamative of buildtng tho ,°
.
constructed weUend treetmbnt system in the upland area paraeel to Eapltol Creek Road,but . ' �
has favorably requested a generai permit#18 to authorize flll which may result from any oi . � �
lhe on-site sewage system altematives. For your interest, I enclose a oopy oi lhe proposed
COE regulalory policy which specHicaily addresses development of single family residences `�F
and associaied eppurtenances iNaround Jurisdictio�al wetlands. ' ��
!�,�
In short,no COE permit is required for consUuction of the resldence foundalion piers. A viable �" ,
on•sile sewege syslem can be insteiled which entails no impacts to wetlands, It is lherefore � i'�"�
possible fo construct the residenee in a manner whiCh is eornpietety consistent wtth exisiing °>
� s �' .°
� welland repulaliona, thus elirninatinp the need for a COE permil altogether. As shown by lhe i '.•; .
Mclaughlin desiqn,a conventlonal syslem ean be insialled on the property, FIII requirad for the !S':;i . '
, possible futura installation of lhis back-up leachfietd is permiiEed under bo[h tho(eiter of curran( �4i' '
:
� �.I-li e nn.l�hn rni 1 ni.....nnen.l r..nl n.�:�i....�..�....,,.u....-.J.. .....t.r_. e
't
. . .,.:.� r -�.�r .,- .:: ., .. �.- . .� .. :.....
L
. . . . . .. . ... ... _�:.- .. .. .. . �,
/.. f . ._ . ... . .. . .. . _ . . - . ' ��c
. ' . � . . . , ' � .,�
� . - . . . . . � . � � _. � . � �
� .. • � .. .- - . ,�
. . - � t . - . . . � {% .
. . . . . . . � . �'i. . � . .
1 11 _ I �� i ,. .
. . . r
. ._ �_ _<- -.' _ ,� _;:
�: . _ , .
,:�. ° �
fip;,.
z
;�' .
__ ,�.,.�...___ �
_ ,
_r , , _
._ .. ,; . :.._.
,.,_,,,
�,.r : �... _. :. ;., • - ,
., _ .:-.. .. . ,._ ,�.
� . �;
%�+I hope lhese remarks are helpful in prevenQng,confusion regarding these matters,
�Slnc y • • . .-
f(fv I� :a ' ,
� � ,
John r e,Principal • �� ���
�y �,.�.
��,
- �, ` i,,__ � i,
- ;�:.., • �`��:
�oal Offlee Box 1203 /?6639 PleeseMC Park Rved /Conirsr,Golarddo 80433�%�
ihona: 303-838-53'19 fex� 303-838-5153 /Denvar matro phona: 169-6304 fexi '163-63m7 si
s_*� r'
� F°y{'-�x't 7
� . . . . . . � � � �-�P
t
_ .. .. . . � � �i?Y^ � ':
, � . ��
;�'i'
,l�W.__
4�
. .. a'?, 3;,.. .
. ..�.�!_'"� � .
,.�
�
�d'
j
�t}
_ � �,�` ' ��.
,:� ': .� „_,; . , . , . . -..
.:�-� . , ,�:: -:. � . . . .�' .::'. ,..�.- . ' - �::-� .�.
l
1:�.
f•
- �r
� 1
� 1;
'�
'— i:
� ?
.
_ .. .... ��;" . ..�.�. . . . '.. .. �� ,�� . �'' J'.. .
1
k'!��
• �V..
� ��
}pl•:
.: . ."�Y � '�_�J
.. �I
1
�. t'
i 'I�'
. � r� ; -�j�.
.
. {� �'�.
,
,: , � 7 ....:''
' ` �-f � -., � �. �' r � r r »
i ..i �,�r � � __ � 1 . � _ a d,
�,� �. y" 3 '* '� � , -3sr.� ..
� K��: �ps .,, z ___ ,' 1 3 . TiAys� .
' ,` .,,,� �'t: i, s^'ft' . �.'�p-� .
a r s f ' � (
� '� 9"e`Y'rA 3"�iiL a•� � r k �-, < z �� . �'T 1,`
".�,�'C2'.'��, "�Y .'a y r.f 5 w t _ i . ' '� : � \
` y 1 y f , -�-,- 4m
� �r�i<�•� � } t lti � i� * ..�y � 3 }m �
x ��' s s Y � t � R .+�` s
y� y �4, rY ,� ,� '��4� k 4 �
1 �T'tiy .{�t 7�Y.v �,7 � i +..r r f t .
Yy�`�,#:Hr,� ; "� � ,
�:�1 I �r���F s .. .y,����.i z'� i i "� '� _.- '. .
s {,�1� u .r r � i:a
� qC�;1 F r�t �. } Y v-�� ' T t�� �. :..
,{1 '�` ~^� -t t � ,� .n . � ' r
.. ✓ f y 1 i,
.:� ,: i .r�. w . �)' .?s �� - / `
:' _.
r � i � ..k. r �+ _
� rKhr� "JUI �f i . S' '��'�y q s'•c
� � .��i {d Y }+P - 1
�� ' � 1 1 .... � . .
',... . . ... . . . . ....�.. .::�. � I.. . . ... �.' . .. . .. .
. . .. ��:. , . . ... .. .-�.. . . ' � '' . '' .
- � A'. .. � - . . . . .
�•: , . _ , , . .
�;�;�� - . . • " ,
,
, �
� �.i4�•UY:I.JC WCJI 4ltiU KCN � � � .
' .. 4-1G—d7 I:71W�1 : .:193G41GS7tlY .'.L'I1'iG7_dJ!/:q . � ".;t. � f kf•4
/,:
. �%'.
OCPARTMCHT OF 71f�AIiMY � , -y�;,�
� ,�w�� . U�B.AIIMY ENOINqR O18TflI0T,BACRIYENiO . —}�'6-25�a'a�S •�� :„
C011MOFlNOINYEfie .J-• �
''4`
191/J STPIEET (�,�,,,�� l�i,
i � R�Ky� 7ACR/tkENTO,CAUTONNIA 98114�IY7 J
._� A(ILH�IONOI "_�. ''
(��'=�:r
�' ..��
!"t��i
�t �.`.
c
7lpriY 12, 149b �*<
i;.s ,:
:__. Regvintory Branoh (19947SZ37) �r K r
.,� �
Hr. Thamee Minee ���
Poat otrice aox 79as ' `n'�':�.
� Anpnn. ColqXado 81612 , '?�'
;:�.,.:::.
Ucar xr. Minea: ;::y
I am Xsspandittg Co youz� raqueet tor a Departmnnt o! tha Army � �
potmit ta disch9Tge E111 maCCria1 Snta wnLiooda adjacont to T "c
CA}��t01 CrBtlk =or tne 810pY OL a w�tla�id sewpga sY�tom or eoptic �- . i;
eY�tiBm. Th8 pYD]CCL ltl lOCriC�CI pt Cayltol craetc in Oaation 7t, �,�"-.'
Townghip 8 South, Range e5 Weet, Pitkin County, ColornQo. Y.
- The ChioE oP Engineera haa 3ssued nationwide qaneral permit `�':�
, number la which authoriags khe diacharqe oE drsdqed or fill
material in d�atora ot thu unitad stataa Ear minor diacharges. wa
have completad Che pre-d3scharqe notifiaatian proceduree required �
by our raqulaticns. Ycur project ean ha oonotzuatad undar this
authority provided tha wark meata the condlciono 1lecea on tna ,�
oncloead inlormaCion arieeta. ThiB Iettar nutnoriaea tha 1..,
diacharge ot 21.5 dubie yarda into t40 squaze f0et of wetlends '��'•�
• toY kha standard septic ayatnm if roquirsd. If the wetland
� traatment tacilitp is approved by the county, the dlscharqo wi11
� be limited to 5.3 CubiC y4tda in L95 aquare Poat of wotlenda. If
not required by tha County, you muet avoid any didchnrga vf fill
mnterisl into wstlnnde, j
� Thia pormit verit{cntlon will be velid for n period of two
_ �• yUdC6 CYOM th9 tlntC CL Lttla lulLet unloeo the na�ienorido parmlr ,�� ;
1a mOdltlCd� Y8190UeQ� pr =evvku�l, yn� ohoald ooataoti thin
oitics 1C wark will aXtend beyond thig date. +,
. , � �'
;';
r..• ,
�,
� � . . . . . ' . . . . .. . .. . 'J.
�
' . . . � . . . . . . . . . ".1.� ,+~i•,:•+
.. . . . � . � . .i. ��
f . . . . _ . . J' '
�.�xr��++�.�u � � � + f:
}� '
..�. eJ.�
. ' .. . :. �.a."'""a��7 a;wi�•-..:�s'u'daua9. f
ar
.,.
"-+�.x��v�rc �.:. ,�� t
. ._. ... ,.
..,. . , ��., . , , .�si -�- . -� . . ,. .. . � , �..:::-w,us.a�«�.�v:8y� c.
.. - .. -.`�7f,�}
. ..
�
. � . . .. . . . � .
„ , ,
,
_. . � � y ,
� `'� ' �,� ;'
, � .
� i • . �' f f
- .. , ,,
� ` � ` `
�,+�'
_ - �
-..:. ' � ' s �_, , , '
�'
-v -- - `r_
�; - _ � .
t�i�'�^„� � .� :. _.
_ • . � .
_i,"�' • .
, _ ^ .
. �•d . ,�.'k M , y ,�7� � . } ..�'� "ai
�1'+. :.J6L�i%aa��3yj>w.i=.. �Y�.fSSliM a.s.-.�L'?. �.�._...... ..._. _..���...�.�L....•"O`�1'`��C� i Y• ��
Y_
s
. ;rll Cr.•�tGG .d�:7 ^rA.O RGG ! •1 17 � 7�6'N�1 1 3aJ3�•IS:�3C:> 3J:O��C37^IN 7
��
+,,` . . . . . . . . .. .. . :°
� � . - ' . . . . � . ' . . _ � . '}�'y�: ..
. . � � . � �. . . . . . � .. � . . . . . . � . . �.�. �:3.
.. . . . . . �.,1'.:.
'._. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . •�,�. ...
. . . . . . . . � �.���
. . . . - � � . �C'.
• �+.
Wa h�v Raeiqnod numbar 199476a37 to your projoct. Plaaoa 3�.' t.
Yefer to thie number in sny coxTespondance with thie oftico. IF �: y�
you have any quoetiotte, plonga contact Mr. Michael Clailey of �-�*r :
th19 O[f1c8 or telephona numbar (970) 247-1199. �,, � :
_ ;'r,�„r' -,
_ sinoeraly, ;��'
';,34�-u:
- s.
. � � - � � .� .. . . - . � ai;t "�`
a . McNure yo '
�Chi i Haeterlt Colorado Ragulatozy '
0 SCa ?f!..'.
402 Rood 7lvenue, Room 1�2 ;. "�"'
� � � - - ucanu qui�u�lv�i� �.�+l�+.ouu oiaoi-c�a�
, . . ,'�.:� .
. � . . �� . . � . � C�' .
�naloaura
1
Copiae FuYaiehsd: ��
Dr. oeno Reob¢r U.6. Environmontal Protactioa aqanay, BWIQ-WQ,
999 16th BtYeet� 9Uit9 500� D�nvar, Colorado B0202-1466 ,
Mr. Keith Rose, U.6. Fiah and Wildlila S4rviee, 76d Horizon
Drive, 5outh Annex Il, Grnnd Junction, Colorado., B15o6,-3946•
Mr. Paul von GuerazRo m�227�tGrendCJunctlon��ColoradoCa81501 ey, � .
402 Aood Avenue, . `� +`•
Mr. xlan Czvnkusch, Colorudo Diviaion oC wildliYe, i77 Hounc5ln
Lnorol, Aupan, Celorwdn 81611 � � - .. � � '
- ....�.. _ . _.. . . . . . . .. : . _ . � ..... ' ..
' ,;;; .. .:. . .. .;. . .:. !. . _..:. ...< . ... . ., .
,. .,. .. .. ��� . �:���:. � ;. �:�. . �. .
.:. .. . .: . . � .
"�
��,�-� . - ;t .
`. 3!
1
- :; t
. . •�.` .J.'�
�,
. _ . ' . :,�' �Y
,� i s' � �,,
,
; , „
. . � Y`� 1 ''!'.:
A, i
.. � � . A i t' ` .
T
�:".�' . . .. . �' . . . . � . . .. . . . . .. ... � �. .!
\ ' .G� � �
i'��f
3�5 � � l '1.rr yIy��7 �
, � ,pY
� {�n1 {y
`
f j:iP�%{
� �� � . � .� � - f �.
, 1 .1 Y ^{� .� .: `� :- �'
T
a ^Z 2 1 .w�� h..
1
� Y -J� ..��� f
�:.l ` -� _>�$ ��
, ..; .:: , ;` ; , ,_'
} 'J t �,
� „ .
-.s� i 7 ''.� - t ' .
.� r } \
� t�. _ . . . . . '�� . - � . .� . . .. . . . ' . . . ,
. n.vf.; �� , .
�y �r„f
�.�. � �.
� . . ,� -
�r . •-.-, _ _ .. , n.o�
.: . ::, Uud-1�1-'W a9::h7 �- _.. - uUc7-rJ1. r. ,
� • APR••1Y-96 MON 10:�T PM • . . , , ! A'
. �j~ � � � .� . .
. � � � � � � � . .�.��. .
. � . . ' � . . : . ._�..'+F�
. . � .. . .1 . . . . . . .. ..
. . . . •:r�, .
, � . .,+r: ��
1.Dltch��p��of d(�dp�d ot NU maistf�l loto nan•tWol w�Umds for t1�e conatrvellon ar�Kp�ntMn .i�`'3
of�slnpiNf�mpy hnme and�tlEnOanc twnrree.7uah�s�par�yt.ddv�w�y,stonp�sh�d.�nd/or 4 �.fr
��ptte fleld,Prov�ded� •
�, th�dl�charqe 7nto wst�n of the United Stetet Oo�f not ow��th�1us�a1 . , s;
moro th�n 1M aerr, . ` �:
_ a
b. the parmltta notitbs the Distrkt Enpuiar In eo6orQ�nce with th� -� y `
'Notlqc�UOn'penual condhion ur moc6ihd ro<<hls NWV o�yh
eetlon�to mWmke tha on•�fu end otf• '��Z..�
e. �h�pu�tino ha Iefun nece�sary ti� , `
dc�Imp�ctr of th•dlcchu9�• IFor�ximpb.the la���bn ot tbe hom�m�y neeA
. to be sd�unt�d on-alte to�rold itoodlny ot�dJecent prop�rty oW�as.l; �� �
d, the diteharpe��P�n aT a slnOle md eompteta proJeet end chn for mY �d,
- tvbdlv�fbn uNt�d or�ubdlvldad etter h��rch 8,19D5.th�dl�ehsrpe��uthod:ed
unda th��NWP may not exceed en spprep�te fotal lo�e ol w�ten ot�he Unlnd ;.
Stne!ol 1/2��re tor the entbe su6divtsian;and � °,�
�, sn Indlvidwl may usa tbb nsdonwlde perm�t only onee.
For ths pnrposee of�hls n�tlonwlde D���t,Ihe�cra�ge ol loea of wetera ol th�Un)t�tl StNtu ; �
InCIuAs��hl.fln�d�as plusaoEothU watero r�the United&t+tnf.eh•1�re�4va�sdy sfTeeted by .
Ibodlnp,�xo�v�tlan,or dnlnae�+s�rcsutt o1 ths prokct. -
� �,. •
;: :: ; t� - .
,
:
, . .
�, _
�r.
�
` 2 ,,.
' ` �'S
� ,il .
��
��';
�'' - ' ... ��� . . .. . . � ...`,
. �. -.. �.. ... " :. : .. .. . . . .. � .. .."_" ; .. .,-' . . . �,
.i ...y.. �..i•. { '
� 1 .3� 1
., ., O n�A�t. .
I� rv�'r �
� r
� 5
1 ` a �T ,i.. �T 'u� ;/
, - .f:� - .':.r+i
.. ' -,`"f�' � .
� i
� � I•.
- {.
>;'
� - -,.
- 1 .
' — ..r.-_ - ux;s .- -
'�� 3
��y�, _ :
sf. .
�.'r'. . . . � . . . .. . .. : . .. - .. i .. .. . _- ... . .__.�..�.�.._�......�_. ,.....�....... r A�5 tP ki%:
��y�c:� � �,
•t -
,
� � b—z�-4;�. ,.
�,;; DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ,j;�;,� �
U.S.ARMY ENGINEER DISTR�CT,SACRAMENTO _�� �j'��
' CORPS OF ENGINEERS � -'��i���'
t; � 1325 J STREET '
SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA 95814-2922 � �{i' r
i1EPLY TO �' �
�nEenoroF ApL'il 5� 1995 ' �'�'�.,.�'�
yi � �s''� ._L'.T,
Regulatory Branch (199475223) � �: -
i ��4 ..�..�:r
:i . i ,y:'�.
. . � -. � .•�.� .�t�.
';:
Mr. Thomas Mines �F �
Post Office Box 3888 i y'
-=-= Aspen, Coloradr 81612 � "��'� -
f
� �>
� Dear Mr. Mines: � `'
3.
I am responding to your written request dated by your *
— consultant John Grove for nationwide general permit number 18 �,�•� .
verification for the wetland sewage treatment system on your lot ��t;�.�
at the intersection of Capitol Creek and Snowmass Creek roads in .�. .
Pitkin County, Colorado. We have initiated the Pre-Discharge �';kT. °
Notification procedures required by our regulations for � �;�s �
nationwide general permit 18 authorization. � ,�:�
We noticed in your application that the pilings for house ,1
construction will be steel girders driven into the soil. The �
construction of a single family residence on pilings driven in �
this manner does not require a Department of the Army permit �.
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. We support your
consultant's original desiqn of the wetland treatment system in
uplands as this design avoids wetland impacts entirely. You ..
have requested nationwide general permit 1s to cover an extension " £:�'?3
of the slope of the system that may be required by the county, or '�`,�
the extension of a slope for a standard septic system design that ;,j
may be required by the county. �+
If you have any questions, please write to Mr. Michael i> .G`,
- Claffey or telephone (303) 243-1199.
�;.
�
Sincerely,
;
•A• �
ady Mcxure �
ie Western Colorado Regulatory �
Office '
402 Rood Avenue, Room 142 , ; � '
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-2563
Copy Furnished: _ �r
Pitkin County Community Development, 130 South Galena Street, �`
Aspen, Colorado 81611 ^�� -
5
�i � i '
.. i, .. . � (�+
' r
. . . . � . . . . t y�� i
.. .. .�.^�.- "_ .. . , _ ' �'.c �bs+�ax.."�. .'-=' :_...a ilvVNww�yya.l+tiir:%.��ra✓:'-i.%r•�
L— " +r_ _ tlS.�fa�.".AtS:`,�L',a'x'�/9tAieii':'Y�'.e++tidia�+:` " ��,v�aa�.r�.tytjf"c,'r,s ...•.::�... I, ��
� . .. . _ .. .. . . . . � _ . � . : �. ' .. `��J�F`i
, � ' � � ��}�r�r �
� - � , .. ?`•�
. �a .:-� `. . . .:- :f . i�
. `' � l� ..A,��
. �
. � �. . ., ( . .� . ' ., � . . ` �. .. '.� ....,:.�. � ,.
, � .:
. � . '� t js . .
_ 1 j ;�
,. , , ,..
. , _ , ..
,: , ,� . : : . ,
1 . .
.. ,,
. ,., , .:� ;. : _-
�: � _
���,� . - � _ .
��
o ,;r, ' ��y,,
�
��f� � �.Y¢7.'+6fra:i�f:.�',�!t.:. 4 2.:��.r. .... :ri� nr. ... . `... - . . � .d.uJt:..�rM+drerh.r:f.'mert.avinv�.src...r.ro.wr.mv,.r_a..�.;....� n r �,r,
- 7...:..;.. * . .
� t ��}'i�'�
� �r... ••---•- ' d 4t "i,�,' ;-,
i'" , :�
I '�,. , �:
UEPARTMENT OF TNE ARMY b-z-9
� � �/• U.S.ARMY ENGIMEER DISTRICT,SACRAMENTO � �ih�.'�_ � � � ��+; � {'
� CORPS OF ENGINEERS � �i ��`�'
'�+a.a�'� � -:
1�25 J STREET ' �S
n¢�xm SACqAMENTO,CALiFORNIA 95814-2922 �_ ��^, r�.
.� � ATTENTbN OF ...- .._•..... •�-•.'
� �. -k'1
'r
� � � � I t � y��rM
� 4 .
S 4�'- .
k December 12 1994 (�-,: - -`
r r . s
� . . . � �hr ... .�,
; Requlatory Section (199475223) -�''
_ f
--- ' ' I,Y�.,,�. :
i ��.:
Mr. Thomas M3nes � 2�!"'
Post Office Box 3888 � _
Aspen, Colorado 81612 ( ;'
_ • �y':,:y.:
Dear Mr. Mines: �'
F~!
I am writing to you concerning your proposed home �' �
' construction at the intersection of Snowmass Creek and Capitol '��='y-•
• Creek roads. On July 19, 1994, we issued Department of the Army • {.�;���
nationwide general permit number 25 to you for the construction
of the house on piers. The piers would consist of concrete , ,�.}
poured in tightly sealed forms. �
We under�tand that the Pitkin County Planning Department is
questioning the validity o£ our nationwide permit verification
letter fssued to you. By copy of this letter, we are informing
Pitkin County that our July 19th letter is currently a valid •-
authorization to use nationwide general permit number 25 for your ';;j}�
project. We are assessing wbether or not this nationwide permit
can be used for pier structures that are not a structural member
of the building. Tf our assessment indicates that nationwide
permit number 25 should not be used for house construction, your
" project will be authorized under nationwide permit number 18. `�i•
For now, the July 19th letter to you is valid. Furthermore, we I
believe you have designed your project to reduce impacts to
;,� .' aquatic ecosystem to the maximum extent practicable.
We understand that you will soon be submitting an
application for an on-lot wetland sewage treatment system•
desiqned by Mr. John Grove. Previously, you had planned a ;
- standard septic syetem on upland portions of the lot. We believe
� that the wetland sewage treatment system is a better system in ,
your situation than the typical sand mound that would be ,-' .
required. These wetland treatment systems have been approved by
the Colorado Department of Health, and are currently in operation
_ in other areas of Colorado. The benefit of the wetland system is
�• .
� 4.
. ' �t•
• _ .,t.'. :'�`�`ry,z 7
�. -_
� '`
'i,
t. '
1 �
, `:..,.......,�------.._. - _ --- ,- ..,.. .... ,.... f � �
� �:j— .. . .a+�:n.ws�'a.h'a�.aar.».c,F'� 't '
. . ���' . .- � ' ... " �kr .
. . . . . . . ' .. ' . �' � . � � � �
v:.� . . . � . . K..
�;
- � ' ♦ .. . � � . . ' .�.�( q ' �
, .. ` . •i�� ,
� ��
. .. :.7 . .. . . � .. . . .. �~ -
, .
�'.. . .. . � .
,� ... . ��.. . ;�� . '. . . ' '•
. . .. . .: . . �' � . . . ..
� r ...�� -�. . � �� . . ' . . c:.-
� , ' / .
. _r- .- :r _ . �:
, _
� � __ .. ..
,.��e,,'� . � •
.,�.. - �
.�, < , ,
:��.._R.�uw�n'4t���� �� fa.+a._..'. "�4iS�-�.*:� �.��'� :�:id'� ..._.._..... _.u..»��� .�....�,w.��� � .. j!�
� � . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . ... . . �����F
� � .f✓` � � . . . . . . � . . , . .- k
,f`� - . � . . � . - . . . ' . � .
3�� . .. ' . . . � � � P? .:�'
�
. . � - . ' . ' . . . . . .-. . . . . . . �r�.
� � � . �. . . . . - ' � - � p•'A �• ♦
� � � � . ' � . � . � .. � ��
� . . . ' � . � . . � ��5.�,
S;�+
� Z r�
that only temporary impacts occur and the wetland landscapa is �,c
basically returned. We hope that Pitkin County will consider the �'",`�� ..�:i
benefits cf this system over the typical design. Although we � ';:
have not raviewed the design plans, we believe the wetland "
----- treatment system wil.l be autharized by nationw3de permit number �
_ 18. Your total project includinq the house and sewage system K�=
� should me'et the conditions of less than 25 cubic y�rds and 0.10 . �
acre of impact in wetlands. *k;`�-
� . . � � .. . f�
Please refer to file number 299475223 in any future
submittal to this office. If you have any questions, please ��-: ',
write to Mr. Michael.Claffey_ or' talephona (303) 243-t199.
. �'
Sincerely, �;.
. . ,::
. . . . � . . -'N � .
. , ' . . � .' . ,� ,��
Grady L. McNure
-- Chief, Western Colorado Regulatory .
OPfice ' •
402 Rood Avenue, Room 142� '��
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-2563
Copies'FUrnished: � .
�Pitkin County Planning Department, 13o South Galena, Aspen,
- ' Colorado 81601
` .
. � . `. � � '
--'
_�'r.
q!
�
^' 1. i
� � 1',I
, . . ,..
+ , ,
.;� �
1 , �.
�;
�? ; �
,
� . ,�:-.:
; 2. . t' i��,
+ � f
� : t � �;
� j'' `.,,- �s.
' , r -
x , p � _ , `,k#�,""�
--� r e h , � ���,���`
� f.. � h 1 � � CN �♦
�
.. , �';1 �'�4 ,. �. � .� �' ,F
. ,
• �� i .: '�X x'�' +�:t � � " . . �7
f y,k .�.�yE� '1
l � :F , �` f
i/ S k^ j i.
. ` t . .
. ,
.
,� � '. � �."Y.. - �.
n
. ' . �.�. v : . _
� ..� t.e -++.r -' ..�� .1(- � - � ,
.. ��. � � . ..
. . �_�����' •
� "�
„
i
�
F
. � t. - -- '. .
!'a`'�.. � � • r •• • r .
`�`". _ "_ . , , .,
� h�.,,,�..,�;
�,.,����.
;;rf,.:Y;�ry!..
���"�`'=�—y� IJEG lo:::l 11CLAW:HLIt1 IJCaTER H'i:PEFI �G'e923197q �~;=� .a�k
'. � - ��9 �:
s - �� :;;
{ *
`' = � � McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd. ' �§;
:, � �
.�
���: ✓ PuN7C.{:S:,aNfl'1�p:11'IIfi74G11.3l4'fi[s1�fl�'lII9H7t�lOptQ�{@yi�q MfAlllS7.�MiX�1f�IfNC!�:yi7 .r
, II9
:;, ���'��...
- ?' 210A Ventnur Avc., Aspen,Col.uado 81611 (303)425•1�20 't,y
i �„ y .
. . j' � �ONAIAC�ktAl!.IttIN � �".
q1 NwlF0�04WCk7JN �<'.'
� �� M a r c h 2 B. ��.1',3 5 � . . . ouvau�rnc�ntr� _ _�}.':
MLWNCT�GCwMf f`�'
MLW14�.K[I.9wll �.
Pl l,n e 9 I n e. u�m�iuu� *"Y.�,y ,
-- Tom hllues n.uwa..uMUN f:_
uiu c.a�errr
P.O, Dox SBQA , MYAl0�9%,SiFO«� Ri� �:
Aypen, Co. Ulnil GEN[A�tWFRL y�O
. . . . � � MKIIAlI F.Mul'L/ �;aF:�.:
� . � . � . p/111MRUNA
RG_ Scptic System for Mi�cs Property '.�cwulo;onR.c �
. . . . � o:ortc..���uN 's,:.• .
. . . �ann.mn.nnwar "1�', �:
UP.00 h�C, hlinesi . � � �NnANM�ufll
� � I�I.�NiK�:lii•o � �
Tliank you for contactiqd McLaughlin Water 6nqineers, Lld. re�arr�zng ���■on�rs
�� _
consulting en$inee�•ing services for �+ur NCCb'fTtINN[Kk �G '•
� y proparty in the Old u•i.9��<<�..�,• -
� Snowmass area. 7he pr4posed home is a 3 Ledruum, 3,800 sqvare fect °A""`""�'"'""'" 3. �
� tBat ia sur►•uunded by wetlan��s on thrae sides.
Yuu have aeleed me to revie�.r tf�e possibility of designing en�l '�
_ . instnlling a Muund typa septic sxy�em on your praperty. There arn
numero��s eoncerns And conflict arcas that must be av�ide�i to•��a11uti�
'� thu installaEion uf such a system. Statland areas arc locatcd to
the Nc+rth, property anJ sr.tUnck lines nre locate�J to t.he Cnst end
South, ancl the hvr�a is l�7cated to tha Wert. An area Uf
�PP�'��im3t�ly 15-feet wir,lv. and 100-'feEt long xs AvailHble for
instullation nf e �t�;und System tlir�t is uut uf the wetlan�.l� and
, setback lines.
Aftei• an inilial revietia, I feel tbat a �l��und System oan he designed
nnd •in§talled within the parau�eters that we have ou site. A
moxlmum of 25 au. yds. of fill and .1 acres is ellowed with.in the f'
_ w�tlands. The septic�syatem itself wiLl stay +aithln the 15-feet of
- �+idtb, but th� fill from the syetc:m will enCroaclt onta tl�e wetloods - �. '
_'__A_ ty G to Q-feet tu the North an�1 into l•ha sei:baalc l�nes by Et to 10
; fenl un th� Soutli. Fina.l drsign oi the system will b� ne<sded to
nctually size the systzm and tP,u encruachmants raquired. If yuu
can uGtazn epprovals to etirr�ach into the satbflek lines, I belicve
_ _ wc cau malce tl�is work successfully.
I
Please let me know the tzming and the steps nr�ed�d for final �
dasign, an� call if you have any questians. �-'• ``;
Very Tru.ly Yours
McLou� 1 krc'1tT r� s� Ltd. �I
/' �rt��
M'.
, Dean•• osier, . . ; ��j
3�� . . . .. _ _ . � .:.
(iGD/MxPesSept3.c\PRELIM i �(�.
� t: ,i,
� ��
L. � � M:��'n:�� _T�c r�U F V 1�71f11 I f�N�n � � TIIt��.pK ' . �,�.
/ �.��.�i4,�'� � _.
� � Na^-�;
, .
.
. , ,
-- a�--�':
. .;. •' ' '
_, , :. . . : . _ ' �_ ' � . + . . � �"y�'.
1 t
i
'. � ' . ; ' .. C.L . \
` �,\ �
.
, •
. . � .. . �. �, .
�. �. . . . .�- . .
. _ , ��. ., . �,'.. . � , '. �' .
. �1 �� ; .. ' r.•f� .. .. � .
. . . . ._ . ..- cf�- . . � • .. � . ��.1 � . .
�791".: . . � .- .. . ... . _ . � . � .. ' .
c�'�� • - ' �
��.
r�.:; ^ .
. .. _ �
_. . ._ _
. .. . . __._ ._. _ _--
� ..-. .. _ . ��';'��;'s
� �i"c .•rt.< �4�.
e� �
� � b-ta�45 '-:
f .
� i.nw�a�ncrs��r• ,';,� ;��'i
BROONEA.PETENSON KAUI�M�1N�I'I•:1'G1250N,P.C. R`�'--':
TELEPHONE �..�.
GIDEON I.NAUfMAN• (303)925•8166 �'ti. -r
� ENIN L.FEHNANOEZ•• 315 EAST HYMAN AVENUE b.
-.. � ... . . qSPEN,COLORADO 81611 PACSIMILE e. ^
(303)925�1090 t��f.��';:K'.1 �
. i ROBYN J.MYLER•^ � .,i..T' •
r y .
. . . •uwaorrtrro�xw�rurm � �;{•:,Y.�:
4�, :.
—�uo�errrmiena�a� . � �
. � —iw�ownio xi xcw�er . S:.
- �1IOCDMMLCtICYT ' y��• ���
VIA HAND DELIVERY '�"'�a
��
April 26, 1995 �
� � 4.,.-`
Board of County Commissioners ';:`:`'.
of Pitkin County . `::.a '
c/o Jeanette Jones �-�,�
' S30 East Main Street, 3rd Floor
, Aspen, Colorado 81611 �< -
.. � . - � � .a:�.
•,q'
Re: Thomas F. Mines/Anolication for Takinas Determination
Dear Sirs: +
,,.�
_ Zn accordance with the requirements of Section 3-28 and the
procedural requirements of Section 5-22 of the Pitkin County Land
Use Code, the undersigned, on behalf of Thomas F. Mines, Sr., the
owner of, and Thomas F. Mines, Jr., the contract purchaser of,
real property ("Property") described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto r�
and incorporated herein by this reference, hereby petitions the
Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County for an economic
hardship takings determination.
This petition and the takings determination are necessary,
as you know, because of the Board of County Commissioners' denial k,
of Mr. Mines� 1041 application for approval to construct a i
'' I single-family residence in a riparian area, pursuant to the
J requirements of Paragraph 6 of Section 3-808 of the Pitkin County �
::{, Land Use Code. In accordance with the standards set forth in Sec-
`- tion 4-15 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code, the Petitioners ?
`� contend that this determination constitutes a taking of their ;�
� private property without just compensation in violation of the
United States and Colorado Constitutions. '
In accordance with the requirements of Section 5-22 of the
Pitkin County Land Use Code, the Petitioners submit herewith the ' ` ,'
� following information: '
Ii
� A. The Identification of Pronertv and the Pronerty is ��
Adverselv Affected hv the Determination. The Property is a
single-family lot located at the intersection of Snowmass Creek �
Road and Capitol Creek Road and approximately 1.982 acres (±) in +.� �;
�� size. As previously stated, the Property is described in Exhib-
`. I it ��A" attached hereto. The Property right adversely affected by ` l�.,
;6 .,;
� �,,
i ,
I #� 1 ;
, __ ---...�-.._... .,.. ,.�.;:;�.� .__:�_........�:,... ...;�.: -
-t;��.:„��... +�.�,,.�.:�>.� ,-v._..-- � .t�'
-.�„���w� y
r
. � � � . � . �x_
' � ♦ y,''
'+4 h "
. 1 � . � � K� �,
� 11 . . . . �`� (� . . ... � 1
; '. .. • � z. .
.. ...� - '.. '�. ..� . � . ...
. �.�
, .\ � � . '1 ����j� . . .
. . .. . ' . . . . ; .
. �. , ��: : - . . . . . . . � .
'- .. '� . . .. �.-i . . � . ' . . . . , .
� - . -- - - r'_ � � � - . . . . . .. E •
. , . -. . .-. ..=-
4'J�: . � � , i• _ 1 _
`��� '
:�c*� , .
'�+-''-"'� . � . ' � ' . ......,__.<.a...w,.:[!..n+rue�lF„w4f.N:d.UiwS:�:Lw:IX � 1.,>h: j x.':
3
��
�r'`
.0
;` �`k�+��.
i Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County •' �°
April 26, 1995 .rJ. �, �
i Paqe 2 - ,�l
.. � . ,y''.'::.�
1 �..�{''+ .
the determination is the Petitioners' ability to utilize the
Property for single-family residential usage and related usage. <.-
i As has been demonstrated, there is no other suitable buildinq site ,;'f,.�. �;
f upon the Property due to 1041 hazards and road usage on a portion
i of the Property. _'�'0;"
�i.R�.�:--�':.
--- B. Past and Current IIses of the prooertv. Since its � �'^°'
creation prior to 1978, the Property in question has always been a k"�;'*�-;`
single-family residential building site. To date, other than a �'�•"'� �
roadway for the benefit of adjacent property owners, no improve-
ments have been made upon the Property. �;��y .
C. T�e Petitioners� Original Purchase Price of the Property. 'rY1
As evidenced by the documentary fee noted on the Warranty Deed •
� attached hereto as Exhibit "B", the Petitioner, Thomas F. Mines, •,=.;�_
Sr., paid the sum of Seventy-Seven Thousand and no/10o• Doilars :.,:y�
� ($77,000.00) on April 15, 1994. Thomas F. Mines, Jr., the other
Petitioner, has an oral contract to purchase the Property from his
� father for this original purchase price, plus any expenses incurred "�"'
by Mr. Mines, Sr., in connection with the Property.
D. The Assessed Valuation of the Pro erty. According to the
records of the Pitkin County Assessor's Office, the actual r
valuation of the Property is Seventy-Five Thousand and no/100
Dollars ($75,000.00), and its assessed valuation is Twenty-One `-��
Thousand Seven Iiundred Fifty and no/100 Dollars ($21,750.00). '1'
E. The Preliminarv Estimate of value Made on the Propertv.
' • As evidenced by the letter o£ R.H. Reeves, attached hereto as
Exhibit °C��, the preliminary estimate of value of the Property ,�,.
_ is between Three Iiundred Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($300,000.00)
and Five Hundred Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($500,000.00).
Mr. Reeves is in the process of finishing his formal appraisal,
and Petitioners wish to reserve the right to submit this appraisal
�_ at any further hearings on this matter.
F. Curreat Mortaace, Princioal Balance and Interest Rate. �,
As evidenced by the letter of Jeri Alberts of Alpine Bank attached :�
hereto as Exhibit "D", at the present time, the outstanding
principal balance of the loan encumbering the Property . is ' �
Thirty-Four Thousand Nine Aundred Eighty-Five and 79J100 Dollars ,` �
($34,985.79) . The interest rate thereon is adjustable at two (2)
percer.tage points over the Chase Manhattan prime rate but at
present, it is 10.250$ per annum, i(��
� G. Yast Income Generated by the Pro�ertv a�d Exnenses .��
Related to the Pronertv. There has been no income generated by the ' ,
Property as evidenced by Exhibit "E" attached hereto and Peti- 1
tioners have expended the sum of One Hundred Fifty-Three I1ine �
�
�'�
. � �s„ �.�y.wS`j��5pr^"�.�"•'�,.. ..., -v�`±ryri�'+1+ -..�. . .-- v_..-..... ^rr
_--___� j �_---___ _. __ _- -�:�._ _ .._..�.. _. �..�.n . :z'
; . �,
. . ' - t
- - ;� ,
,: ._
� , . ,
. _ .
1 ; �
: , � : � :
�; � • �
f� ,
`� , .
��" , .
__
• �
� �.�. .�:• _... _ .. .. .._ .:. H.:��e.�wr��:d;�,�a�::�a,�aw��;av��u�:aa.�-'
_...._ ..,,a: - .
:, , . ,�.,,,
. s'� ... _ ... ... . ._. ,�::,�.
! • ;�s�±. �''t'
� �:��'�:._
�
� � Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County �
' April 26, 1995 �'
' Page 3 ':�3
i •:{-'j
�� Hundred Fifty-Five and 98/l00 Dollars ($153,955.98) in connection -�
with this Property and with the application for the approvals for �.
f a single-family home on the Property. The Petitioners will incur !
additional expenses including, but not limited to, legal fees in
connection with the Property in the future. `��
_..__ .. _ .
`;`r':.:
H. ownershio Structure of the Propertv. The Property is 'a.=
owned by Thamas F. Mines, Sr., individually. As stated, Thomas F.
- Mines, Jr., has an oral contract to purchase the Property from his
father. 5,.
I. Owner�s Tas Hracket. The Petitioner, Thomas F. Mines, '7 _
Sr., is at present in the Thirty-Three Percent (33�} tax bracket,
and the Petitioner, Thomas F. Mines, Jr. is in the Twenty-Five
- Percent (25$) tax bracket.
J. Rental Value of the Propertv With and Without the Offend- •
inq Determination. The Petitioners contend that the Property has t
� no fair market rental value at the present time with or without the
� determinetion of the Board of County Commissioners and that the
Property may not be built upon in the least hazard free area of
� this Property.
K. Sale Value of the Propertv. As a vacant piece of land, ��
upon which no one can build, the Petitioners submit that the value
of the Property is minimal. The value of the Property without
the takings determination by the Board of County Commissioners
of Pitkin County would be the same as the estimated value by
� Mr. Reeves referred to above, which is between Three Hundred
Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($300,000.00) and Five Hundred Thousand
and no/100 Dollars ($500,000.00) .
L. othaF Infermation 9earina on the Difference of the Value
'*�. of the Prooertv With or Without the Takinqs Determinatioh. If the
' -`-;- Property cannot be built upon the proposed location, given that �
there is no other suitahle site on the Property as the Petitioners
wish to demonstrate at the takings hearing, the Property is
essentially worthless to the Petitioners and to anyone else for any
. purpose. '
The Petitioners respectively reserve the right to submit
additional information at, or prior to, the hearing including,
but not limited to, information addressing the standards set forth
in Paragraph 6 of Section 3-808 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code
reqarding the Petitioners' efforts ta maintain vegetation, reduce :"�
`Yfi,.
erosion, avoid leakage of containments into ground water resources, r�-•
reduce stream'pollution, and, in qeneral, to minimize the disrup- ' ?
'�' tion to the wetlands area in question. The Petitioners believe I�
� that through their design efforts, they can utilize the least
I ,. + i;:.., ... ,
� ,�y . —
,...-� n�..., +1+ri��pS3YlT7/ff . 7i L ':? ... .}'! i�1�vS'i!K i�
�.._.-�... ... ._.._ '_...:}..�. ..,.....�...�..�.,,.,.,��..-_
. /�-_... ..wu..v. �..,...[..w.0 7a.»�.....,_' ' ...,... '_.,. __,..� . .. , ._.....a (�A'Y ��. .
�
. � . - � - � � .. � . .. �-. � .. . � . � .. . � '� '�: ..
. . . . � . . . � . f ,� J
♦
� . 't . . . ' . .. '�
1, _ _
. \� ' _ . � . . .. � . , . . . . � - . � � . .. ��, � .
. I � .. � . . . . � • . ' ' � � .. .:�t. . . . . .. .
1 ; ' , -
. � .
�. -
• -..- .- . . _, .,, _
�: . , • •
'����
t .
�
* �„ __.��...�.LL
:
r� �. . .�� . . .. �
9 � �
. ��.� _..;:,.a��rt�r...1.�.�3.3.... �?'jw,�:.._..� '�s . .:�:.;. ..... ,.:.a: _...'...._.7id�� '� .... .. ....�.... __.. _ q�y "�``
f�,�
�
,,'�� �
�
. � �� •
Soard of County Commissioners of Pitkin County �';
� April 26,, 1995 � �!- :,: .
_ Page 4 `�,�
. ��� w
3
. .. . - � 4;:!- .
. � . . . � - . :ti�'Z��r..
offensive and obtrusive building site on the Property with minimal 'y4
k�
;
disturbance. �� s
�.'�,F.. �i
In conclusion, the. Petitioners respectfully request that a ;.�.hr,i .
- date for the takings hearing be set in accordance with the
requirements of the Pitkin County Land Use Code, as the Peti- ? ,tn'",,
tioners' Property is being unjustly taken without appropriate :,-�
compensation. �"4•�:
� . . . . Y.-.:..
Very truly yours, °''� "
��..
KAUFMAN ETERSON .C., s.�'1' -
A fession 1 Co ora ion
.�-,
W�<'. .
. .. . � . � Y� .
BY� '�
Br ok A. Pe e ,.�
- BAP/ljk
Enclosure: �
cc: Tim Malloy (via hand delivery)
John Ely, Esq. (via hand delivery)
Thomas F. Mines, Jr. (via hand delivery)
: James Colombo (via hand delivery)
� . :�lescers\boee � � - � . �
.. . ...�. . . .- .. .. �•.. .
..
�... . . . . _. ....�, �
� .::.:., . . :�. . ..: ._ _„_ .�,,,.,�. . + .
. ; . . . . ... _ -.. ,.
_:�.,:: _ _ ..., . . . .,.. ... .,. , _" .,-: , . �� •
.:,�; . � ,_. .,-. . . .. � -.:. . .
•:�. ::::. . . .. �-..� �.: . ' .. .
��
',y
r.
i.• .�.�,
�
�'
' 4,
�� ' .. � . . � . �::{ ' �eJ
�.� i ,.j �
; , � ��!
��� I r
I � �
.
' � ZT.s/-�tL � �
�" � �ilMiriy�wi�a�q � e�' .
1 �'
/ `a .� �g = , C+�'MtIFn
� h� ��� ����j�'' .•�
a 'T j: .^
.
� r y� yr. �� ` �. �; .,,�t
, =�f '1 n JL #�, t. � _
� � � �
�,,.s i i- \ � �1
�� a� �
1 J�'� x.� nu r •:�R.t 7 ,
`_` ' L r: 5 .�� :f A .
� ���� E i'
_ ;.
�� a _
_ .,,r• � _ x •i .�. / . . .
�+ ' } �
�¢� .
,�, " , .
-•tsF
. _.. ____
,
�: - ,
� � �
:�_ .: a...�...„: . .
s ...,,...._a.._�_.._. ,... _ ,_ . ._... _ _. ,_ . .,...na.-..es«e..u,,;.:aa�r.r��ran:�.�.,,u,r,c�wa�a .+r�.,a
' • �`�rg� ���
1 , • . q.�
EXHIBIT A
A Parcel of land situated in Tract No. 82, Section 34, Township 8 South, �•
Range 86 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, lying Westerly of a County � s �
Road as constructed and in place, Northerly of the Southerly line of =�s;;3..•�`
said Tract No. 82, and Easterly of the Westerly line of said Tract 82, ! ,�;; �'�•
described as follows: � ; ��:;•_;•r,, ,
� BEGINNING at an iron ost with a brass ca � s ��� �.�
p p properly marked for Angle ,•� %
- Point No. 3 of said Tract 82; ' `'f-:t�i r;
Thence North O1°18'00" West 416.58 teet along the Westerly line of said ' ''�
Tract 82 to the Southwesterly corner of property described in Book 222 �''�� �,,
� at Page 217, Pitkin County Records; ' ,;':u''_;:�:�:: ,°
-� Thence South 87°43'00" East 215.83 feet along the Southerly boundary of ��s �
_ said Parcel to a point on the Westerly 2ine of said County Road; g ;��
"- Thence South 10°28'00" West 154.24 feet along the Westerly line of said �`
. County Road; �<'-�� .
Thence South 29°23�00" East 191.13 feet along the Westerly line of said i '�`�
County Road; �
Thence South 60°53'00" West 183.98 feet along the Northerly line of said ' �
County Road to a point on the Southerly line of tract No. 82; x '�'
�
Thence 89°27'00" West 49.82 feet to an iron post with a brass cap found � ,Y�
�,_
in place and properly marked for Angle Point No. 4 of said Tract 82, ,�� . .c ;
being also the South one-quarter of said Section 34;
Thence North 89°27'00" West 48.18 feet to an iron post with a brass cap "
found in place and properly marked for the North one-quarter corner of '
Section 3, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6th Principal Meridian;
Thence North B9°46'00" West 13.70 feet to Angle Point No. 3 of said �•��
Tract 82, the Point of Beginning. • . �
t "
t
,
COUNTY OF PITKIN,
STATE OF COLORADO.
. _ . . . . . . � , . � . � � .. � � .1`��.
. - � . . . � . _ . . - � . . . � �. .� -. � . .� .� . �
._ . . . . . . . . - . . - . . - . - . . I .
. . . . . . . . . � � .. .. i'� �F�• .
. 369n93 b-747 P-642 U4/1.;/94 44:21P FG 2 OF 3 i-
� , �
b• . k
��
�.
: , .
. i; �
- .�,
�:.
' �t1, .s.
� � . . � � � - � � . . ' a
. . � . - .. . . . �� , .. .;. �
� � . . . � , � . � . . . � - � `
. • �i`r �
� y � ..
3 ia �
_ I � �
;,�����
- -- '�r��x
/ ' . � �.r y.�.
.: , .. �I�,l � J
%a. �i
i. '1'�a; �
T � �,��t
.
` ' f � �' r � t�s
� �
��. (Y ' �'.i,.�.j .
� , -;: - '
�.
� - .
� y , �s � � -
• ..: , .,.'" . ,.
--„ � : .. . . :_, . : _ .
, . - .
�:. ;'. .' : _ , : •- , �
:�d�"� -
�. . . . .
:�
� .
:.... . ,. __ , _
. �.�.�.��i� "�� �;
{ • " ••• EXHIBIT „B„
' WARRANTY DEED �
,r�� � . _,-�4 '� .
� THIS DEED, made thia 15 day of APAIL •i- `
.-�`.'':;
1994, batween LISA ANN NEWMAN �•+;
�t:�":
+ � .
OF�THE COUNTY OF PZTKIN, STATE OF CO _ -z 7~-+.,,�`i
GR71IiTOR. �'i.r L,:
� TliOMAS F. MILIES, � . . . y��: _ �.
" �G
GRANTEE ,4`*r }.
whoae legal addresa is : ' `� !'
• P.O. BOX 985, EDWARDS, CO3 81632 ���`y
CITY OF EDWARDS� COUNTY OP � STATE OF CO � , � :#r�
__- WITN8338Tti, That for and in cnnsideratioa of the aum of tem dollars ���
and other good and valuable conaideration, the receipt and sufficiency of '��a,-
i �.;_w;.-j•� .
which is hereby acknowledgad, the grantor has granted, bargained, aold and t-
. conveyed, and by theae preaents does grant, bargaia, sell and convey and "-
confirm unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns Eorever, all the real 4:� ;
property together with improvements, if any, aituate and lying and being in
. the City of SNOWMASS, Cauuty of PITKIN, State of COLOIVIDO, described ����"t'�-...
• as followa: . � �
. . e';�;.
see Attached Exhibit "A" '�"
• �` •
�' ,�.:
. e
369��93 H-74i F'-841 �]4IiSt�s� .,�,:taF' PG 1 OF 3 ' REC DOC yt
SILVIA DAVIS F'ITICIN COUNTY CLEFK Sa fFECORDEF 15.G0 F'. r0 t `'
1
i
, � . . i �.;�-
�,;
xoGSTx6R with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances i � ��•'�
' thereto belonging, or in anywiae appertaini.ng, and the reveraion and i
� reversions, iemainders, renta, isaues and profits thereof, and all the . j �
� eatate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor
� either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with
D the hereditaments and appurtenances. ' j �`• ��'
. . � :
�4'
> To HAVS A2ID xo HoLD the said premises above bargained and described,
— with the appurteaancea, unto the grantee, his heira and assigns forever.
1�nd the Grantor, for himself, his heirs, and peraonal repreaentatives, does � ;
--�- covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the Grantee, his heira and '
assigns, that at the time of the ensealing delivery of the presents, he ie
s—
'^ --'--� ^� �h- ���ma�aa whnve conveved, has good, sure, perfect, �
� ' •
i
'`�.
; � .
_ ; •-�5
�J ,°-
� ti
! �
. f ;k;� ,�
_ � � �
-. . ��
. � ;r��
r ���i
`� �/( — - ..:� � +1-�.
' ' � a' '� . .I
.. ��� � f ' .��� ,
� l , :
, `' r �
t � 1
�r � . s f��l' - - . .
� � �
i
_ .1 ! .
,.
, , , . ; .
`, . �_-:- .: .,
,_ _. y: _ ,., _ -. . _
�: .
�. .�g,.ry,•F ..� . �. - . � � . . .. . �. . . . .. . . . .. . ., . . . . . , . .
.��
,
, _...._ .;.r � •.
.. _. -. . _ _ , _
.. . _ ___ � �'`+c':
4� i:t'r
,
EJCUIBIT "C" �.�;•
' R. H. REEVES ��::�F �5�
� A P F R A I S A I. S E A V I C 6 S O F v A I L, I N C. ;�_�; _'.��`'
r;
. ..- ..
{ . P.C.8oz 1236•VNI,ColoitAO 81658 � '�r=, '`.,. ..
(30.1)�76-31Z0 !'.r.'...;��
_�y..`. "'�.r;
�t'
,�'.
. . '. , � . .:1,�.
� - .. . � �` # �
���
_ April 28, 1996 �.'�' ;r .,
. � . - . �:f.:!�ej,�.
� . . � . � .. . a` ::....
lir. Blrooka P�tor�on ,n;
! Xuutmaa i Pstsraon, i►.C.
i 31S E4st Hymas► llv�rtus ri�r'�9
11sp�n, Colorado 81611 � �t•r
. . � � - � '•,Li.. •r.'�.
,; REt Thomn■ 81nu `::'•;.
� ��'I�J
Csar Nr. Prt�rson: ' :
Purauant to yoar rsquest Y sm analosinQ thia l�ttar r�arding th• � ' '`;
valustlon of th� Min�s residrnor sits locatt4 in Old Snovmn��. Th• �
i.9e� acr� ait� {Pltkin County r�oord�y i� tha »orthwsst carn�r o= tha
int�r*aation oi 8novmaos Cz��k Roed aad Capitol Cr��k Road. 4apitol '
Cr��k Tun� tArouqh th• lot and it is ackaovledqsd that som• ot tA• rit• , _
is v�tiand�. but tl�e U.e. Army cor� oi Ettqina�rs approvad th� projsot
� snd buildinq �nv.lop� (loestion) on tly� �fta in 199a aad roo�ntly ; r;'�
apprav�d th� propo.•d s.ptio ryssem. � ��� '
i
R��ssrch ot th� mask�t aroA to dRts indicat�s s pznliminery value ! :�
renq� a! trom $300,000 up to $500,OOQ and po�llbly ebov�. No creeksida ;
sit�• in eha Old 8nosimasi as�a ars pra�ently svailabl• !or l�rs than �
g3oo,000.oo and it i� commonly kaoarn that demRnd i� very �tronq for hom� ! *' k�,
, .i �it�r in thii n�ighborhood vriil� the �upply is �xtremely limit�d. r
�
I A [uil �DPraiaal o! th� subjact proparty is undarvay and vill �. � .
i mad. availaDl� to you ar soon as paar i,b i�. P l sau oontaes h p praisal � ,
sarvla�s ot vail 3! yau hsw �ny Qusetion■. �
-a-�
'� i Bincar�ly yours, ;.
i '
1 �,X �-�"----- : ,
• R.H. Rseva� ' i ; i
RHR:t1� . � - ��3.
j �.t?
���
, ..
I _ { i i -
i c. ?,
� , i :�� �'..
�
; , . ,:., .�
�I . . f �F�Y.::1:1 .
I .
��S �
' ��- . -� . �i+i+ti�,siV+Yii�✓"�_�., ._ �� � .
� � - . : ���t l��:
\ 5,.
, .. �
..'`... / . ".:, ,.�.. . �.. ' .:._ �' . . . ' '. � • �. � . � .
4i !
� � � � . . . .' / ' � ,
�J �>
, t o r.•;.t� .
` ± I,' ,
. .
t ' . .
- .-� >�� .:�� .'� - .�- .i._..,;. � . ....,_ � - . . _ .� � �. . . . .
� � _ . �J . � � . .. ,t: ,� . . � . . .�,: � . � � . .
.. . ��f�,�! . �� . . - . . . . . . � . . . . .. ..
jX`M{ ,
: _..__ _ _ _
. -�,.4,...,,,,,1
• �.�....
_ , . ' �f
,.... , EXHISIT nD° i�i'
,
. . . . . � . . �w
t,
i �% J �il'!e�( . ,+ r:.:
� .
: ,,,�
- � ► O GtDondale s:;� ..
_ , i Z",,
•.,;�
March 7, 1995 }��
: s.
,; �:
�n
�'.
- - Thomaa F. Minee ��x� ,
P. O. Hox 985 ,,��,.- .
- { Edwarde, Co. 81632
.:i . . . . t4.`.
' .i RE: i�nan #07569-7 a .:
IDear Thomas: ;�Y�
s 'r:
� This letter is to notify you of the change in your interest
. i rate/mortgage payment, effective with your May 15, i995 payment. '"
;.,q;
The outetanding balance of your loan, as of the change date (change
` date April 15, 1995) is estimated to be $34,995.79. According to
the terme and conditions of your note, the index fe Chase Manhattan "�`s
_ Bank's prime race, which ie currently 8.250ic with a margin of
. I 2.000k. Your interest rate for the coming year will be increased ;
co 10.25ok and your payment will increase to $497.38 y
,,.�
beginning with your payment due May 15, 1995.
� The next adjuetment to your interest rate/payment will occur on
?i.�
� April 15, 1996, effecting your May 15, 1996 payment. A new payment J:•�
, ; ' book hae been ordered for your convenience. Should you have any t
I queetione regarding this matter, please feel free to �
R
i contact me.
� I Sincerely, u_.
, �
••�:�.a.:� '�a\��
Jeri A1berCS �`
�_� Loan Department � `�,
, � � ,
J a ;',
--.!
. .
j �
: i
I ��:
� �.
,;, ` .:
� � ��
� � � � 0726HignwayMl9J•CarDOnea�e,Comnao87623.q031963-3040 � �yr,
,
.�...,..,..,..-..�..�.,..w.. g�� recyclad psper f � � i
F�' �
�r: �
I �� ,
� ,
;�'��r
, ,
� �
� .� � .. Y:. a� _'+:
, , �'4)�
... _ ,;�� '��
� `. �
�` t ��� � ` ' - `�i
, . , . ..;
..:' .. :. .. ♦ � : ' .. � ••�. '� .. �,r " '
I `t,, ;
'1 ' ', .
,
� ' .:�: '
- ; _ �. ;
. , .
.
�.
_ ..t _
,- .
j�
.� , �
,,,�. " . •
, h .
}"�'e+ /
�'&'� . . -........_..�. ....,-........ ...... _.. ..._. ........ . .......__ . e ..�• .. . :.: - � M a .�P i��-�/ .
....-. ...�.-. . ..� . �- IYM�uiG'Nl151 � ���i
. . . � . . .. _�. u.�___�'�. .. �........ . _. �.. ..__ .. " �:
• �
1
t . . � . � . . .. . � ."+' `y:
: i
� � � . . . � . . . . � � �'.�`,
. . . . � ' . � . � � �� � ,''p,��
. . . . ... . . � � . . � � f �,
EXHIHZT ugu •.;';
. : . . ... .. s,i�r� y:�,
. , . . _ . . , - - � � �a.. :.Y
, , .. . , . , �14�..
THOMAS F. MZNES ��yr sy.
� �,� r
APPLICATION FOR TARINGS DETERMINATION '°
_ +�'y�
�; �T.t
. . � . . '.t?K' ,�.
__ �. . . � . � " . � .
General Itemized Expenses • $ 18,733.54 a�":
+ Fees owed to James Colombo for "� '�
�� Architectural Design 13,000.00 :�a.
f r �t: .
Fees Owed to John Grove for �
;i Septic System Design 4,000.00 '� . `� `
, 3..
• Fees Owed to Dan Derosiez for �:s
Septic System Design 2,000.00 �
Fees Owed to Srooke A. Peterson for 6i ���
Legal Services to Date � 1,685.33 �e
�
Fee for Appraisal by R.H. Reeves 800.00 y �
. . . � - . - . . i
Taxes on Monies Removed by Thomas F. � ?.�,.
- - 5:'.iy;4
Mines, Sr. to Acquire Property ��� •-
($42,000.00 at 31�) 13,020.00 , .
Reasonable Compensation Owed to Thomas F. . ( �'
Mines, Jr. (624 hours at $35.00 per hour, i ,
52 weeks at 12 hours a week) 21,840.00 •i i,�,
Mortgage Payments on Property to Alpine Bank 1.877.11 ��
�- ..
TOTAL EBPENSES $ 76,955.98 a
�'' i �
Land Purchase Price 77,000.00 !'
;
TOTAL 5153.955.98 "
�
...� ; • .
,..I . . . miseUnines.exp : , . . . . . . � � .. - � _ . . � E _ ..
1'
• •�: .
' �:
1� ..
� �.
j �,_
s Si
. . , . . . . . . . . . . �� t,
: � . . . � . .- . � . . _ � . � } � ' '.
� . . .. �. � . � . � V� �
.;�—'�"�-----^'^— , __'� ~��%.
. : , . , . � �;�°�—a
/ ' ���� ' \
. 1 = I �.� ���
� L . . �� .., �.,'^• }
, ��- 5 1��.. �� 7 . �-�. +�J. •<
\
� .,`_
�' � '. J �� ..'� '.'. t , .��� l. - .
,,.
� . .
��
' .f r ','��.
.�' 1 I i ��f� ��i .
I
1
:�
. �' -
' _ .F�^ ' ��# 't � �
. �� t� _ . .. .. . . .
� ;�.�.: � • . .
-'1�
�._::..-_�.. _ _ .
:. - , .
t ....
�� �? _:.«�,-.
p
r' �
, �,2� r �,�
� . . �''�,"� .?S�!�?
I' �,,�:'i0
� � ii„.>'.Cy :
l 1'
AGENDA ITEM SOlIIQARY � .�;.;..'��
; � •
� TO: Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners I ��"�.'•,,.,,-y,�
Regular Meeting - June 28, 1995 `� � �--•
� {
3,. s`.
TffitII: Suzanne Konchan, Community Development Director I r
A,' .
FROM: Tim Malloy, Deputy Director of Planning f '�
. " I � :3.:.R*�.�.r.
•"T;'^GY::�.r�
-- RE: Wachtel (Lot 29) 1041 Hazard Review &.General Submission � a �
�
_— ' .:°"` :
---_=_---=--_r�-===--__ —=--_��--==__ �
SII�IARY: The Board last reviewed this application on May 10, 1995 �, s�
and tabled final decision to allow the Board to conduct a site - r7u.:
visit. The purpose of the site visit was to determine whether an ��.�
alternative building site exists which reduces the wildfire hazard. I �G . ••
, The site visit was conducted on June 20th. Staff has attached the +
• memo and resolution from the May lOth meeting. Staff has also ! ��y'- ,
received a letter from Kelly Rogers of the Colorado State Forest � � �.�
Service. In this letter Mr. Rogers indicates that, from a wildfire ; ��
standpoint, there is little advantage to moving the building from
the location proposed by the applicants. The Planning Commission ;.Q
and Staff recommend approval of the applicants request with the
conditions outlined in the attached draft resolution.
i REQIIEST: The Applicant is requesting approval of 1041 Hazard Review -,.
� and General Submission for construction of a single-family ;�!.�:�
residence. The property contains areas mapped for severe wildfire ':
i hazard, geologic hazards (slopes of 10 to 30 percent) and wildlife ;
. � habitat (elk transitional range and winter range, elk and mule deer
migration pattern) .
r_
,. I Note: This application was deemed complete prior to the April 27,
1994 deadline and is being processed under the provisions of the �
"old" Code.
1'
�. APPLICANT: Luke and Ann Wachtel I� �`
APPLZCANT'8 REPRE3ENTATI9E: Gideon Kaufman, Kaufman & Peterson - ��
SIZE/LOCATION: The project site contains approximately 35 acres and
, is known as Lot 29 of Sopris Mountain Ranch. . ' . '
� - tl
ISSIIE3: . /
; 1. The subject property has been determined to be encumbered by 1'��'
� "severe" wildfire hazard. The severe hazard encompasses the �
entire property. Since this application is being reviewed ,�� ;
under the "old" Land Use Code, development can be allowed ;�
within the severe hazard provided the applicant complies with _ � `
the wildfire mitigation measures recommended by Colorado State � , �
. � L c
! '�"'
� I � _..r_.�..._..__..�-.__.- ------� ..�.......,_��...._..��..,a.�.r .�:,��_.....�....,..�,;.r.s,y.---- � c;
r__..� .�.�._�.._._--- ______� � . '3\`� "
`} �
;4�
/'• ' . . ,.. . � ' . . . . . . � . . . � . f��� 4�..
. � . . . . �.���
. , � ' . ' . � . . . . . , . . ��: J
_ � , _ . . . , . .� .. . �:- \
\ �•� . . � . . . . ` • .� ._ . .,� .
I . . . . . . . . . . . . . • :�i. . . . - . � . . •�.
. ` S . . ' . .. .- . �.. .. ... . . . . � �. . . �
. . .. . � .�. . . � . - . . - . .
. . .. � . � -. . . -
- � -: . � .. �..� .. . '� � ��..�-. . � . . . � � . .
�. � .. . . .. . .. ' _ .. . . . . , . . � . . , �
�¢F,�. '
,.rF.
.�y
. .�7�'J . -'+iaS�.1YF w:�3�1.-.Y'... r i.�'.. . ..... .-...... ... '._.. ' • ..v iTr»'....Lr..�,.. ^
. �+a�.rn. ....�.._._��r�i ��Li!''
j
'a„y
,t ,�
. 'Fi.. ,.g•i4�,.
���':•s:. .'RY.+'
y Forest Service and the Pitkin County Sheriff's Office. The ;�i; �`�'�
�, Sheriff's Office has recommended that all of the wildfire "x+:= •r.
� mitigation measures (including the Structural Design and (?'� �•• '!�
i , '.':•�.
Construction Options) outlined in Section 3-807 of the '�new" -,�- � -
� Land Use Code be required. The P&Z recommends that, based on �' �� ="'�r�
the language in the "new�� Code, the applicant be required to �'y:�:•••-
acomply with only the defensible space measures. j-;,' - ;.
� 4y r
� Z. The Colorado Division of Wildlife indicates that their primary �
- concern is to preserve the riparian habitat associated with
the drainage which runs through the property. To accomplish ��"�."Y:*'.` .
� this they recommend that the building envelope be maved 100 :;� �-
feet to the east. � °"'��
� 3. The subject property includes signfficant areas of slopes ���`'`��'
greater than 30 percent, including a small area within the �
, proposed building envelope. The Planning Commission recommends r�`
that the applicant be required to avoid disturbing any area ,:�Y� .
. of slopes greater than 30 percent. The building enveZope ` �'
, reiocation recommended by the DoW increases the area of steep ;'�! �
slopes within the building envelope. Staff recommends that the •�"+�`
building envelope be configured to exclude all areas of slopes
greater that 30 percent. The P&Z felt this would result in an .•,r=r
awkward buiZding envelope and instead recommends that the 1041
' site plan identify all areas of slopes qreater than 30 percent
within the building envelope, and include a note prohibiting ;�:
disturbance in these areas. The applicant has agreed to this
restriction.
4. The Planninq Commission has not recommended a house size
+•'��
limitation on this ro ert as has been re '�� �
P P Y quired on several �f
other lots in this subdivision (lots 17-24, 24 and 25 via
Reso. #91-171) . One issue which the Planning Commission did
� not consider was the possibility of limiting house size in
� + response to the "severe" wildfire hazard on this property. 'ti.
, Staff has, in the past, provided the Board with information �
:; showing a significant increase in the danger associated with
--'•; fighting house fires when the structure exceeds 5,000 square `
.�' _� feet. In fact, this information was used durinq the process
of amending the Code to require sprinklering for homes located `•
J within "severe° wildfire hazard areas. Staff wonld point out ��
` I that in this case the appiicant has aqreed to the condition y
requiring that the house be equipped with an in-house
i
sprinkler system.
r-'
i RECOMMENDATZON: The Planning and Zoning Commission and Staff �
� recommend approvai of the Wachtel Lot 29 General Submission and
1041 Hazard Review application subject to the conditions in the ,�-
attached draft resolution. �t;
ais_wachte129 resume ;: :::=:,1
. . . . '�:i.' .�i�
4'� P ' -
�..:,•
2 ��
i`
t;, �'.
..� _!""�;;-.�aeva.��a'�3�iits;a�°,�x,.3i,;isi�:..�,s,.:..ca:;:•..o:...,. -......-----� . .._._._._.—.--�_.� .,.�....._,.......,.y�W:,:�.�..-:_._ '.,-._ . ClYar�
. �.,, �"�. � . . � .: . �. '�. ' . ,.
.
�, . - '� ' ,_. ..; .': .
„�r
�--� t
_ +
� � j
. . � � ' . � ..�. i . _�� � t
�1 �� � (� � � . 1
� ' '�-• . . :, �. _ � . . . .�,. . .• . �' �� . . ::.
. .:� , ,:.�.. . - . ... �. . . �. . ..
j. . � . ' . . . � . . ' ��,' . . . . _
. � . . . - � ' . . . . ��' . . _ , - . • .
� �r � , .
�
� ,
_.- ..� _ _.,_. _. .. . .
- . . ._.� _.., � .
_.�.�: .
�
. . tr�f.,.n- .. . - ._ . , , � .. . . � _ � � .
...h-� " � . ' .
•i.l' '
�
'=._,,"•."'�i���.
y:s r, �;,
j"'�� Y
. � � �,.�4;�
' �- ;�` �'�i
'�; �' -'- .
AGENDA ITEM SUlalARY ; ..
f r.; �:
� TO: Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners �i,
�`;.'�,.•a
� Regular Meeting - June 28, 1995 i.+. ;:.,,
� ' �'Z_�.
Tffi!II: Suzanne Ronchan, Community Development Direct �t �� •
tix.-
j.
FROM: Tim Malloy, Deputy Director of Planning I �: ,:
J-'
RE: Crowley Acres Subdivision Detailed Submission and Final ��"_�''
Plat �.��:�.
_...._. .�0
. � �� �r —� � _ �� y�~''',''.
8olIIlARY: The Planning.Commission reviewed this application on March
7, 1995. Both the Staff and the Planning Commission recommend :�..•.,
approval of this application subject to the revisions and f'
clarifications identified in the attached draft resolution. '%�`�
4 �.
. REQIIEST: The applicant requests Detailed Submission and Final Plat
� approval to subdivide Parcel 4 of the Claude Crowley (subdivision) .,;-''�
Estate South into three (3) lots for single-family residential use
and one open space parcel. The three residential lots are located , ;,•p
along the bank of the Frying Pan River, while the open space parcel
consists largely of an open meadow area.
� This application is being reviewed under the "old" Land Use Code
in accordance with the Board of County Commissioners policy
regarding subdivision applications in process.
`��i�
APPLICANTS/ Ray T. Crowley, Wanda L. Beitz, John C. Crowley
•---- OWNERB: and Janet L. Woolsey.
� APPLICANT'8 REP&ESENTATIVE: Thomas Adkinson, Rrabacher, Hill and
Edwards Law Office. 4.
� LOCATION: The property is located on the north side of Frying Pan
Road (County Road 104) and adjacent to the Frying Pan River. The �
site is known generally as Parcel 4 of the Claude Crowley ;
,-�, (Subdivision) Estate South, and is located in the Thomasville area.
ISSIIEB: There are no significant outstanding issues on this - �:
application, other than the revisions and clarifications identified �
in the attached draft resolution of approval.
RECOHI+lENDATION: The Planning Commission and Staff recommend � �
approval of the Detailed Submission/Final Plat application for the
Crowley Acres PUD subject to the revisions and clarifications ���
identified in the attached draft resolution. k(�
�,�E
3
,
�=�' �I'
�
L
;y �
I ��
r �
:� ��.�..�:�, ....,.n w4�;;;� � (
wt+�r��d�.�i4'•"Yn-ai: ...�l�.u� �k1+Fr�St::'i..a�Y'-.-v,�:r..,,,�.3�.. ...v<w.wr.. �,4�,.,, ..+.�e�.�. �v* .
� .. . . . . . . . . . �A�e1` Y
1
/'.� .. . � . .�. "� . .- , . . . . . �I . � �r.
.J i.
�_". . . . . .' . . . � . ', - . �.��n \
. � . • . . . . . . ` . . �.. � :�•��
` .� . . . - . . . . � . - ... . . .. . . . ,' (.� ��'..
� � . • . � . . .. . . . . . . , .
1 � . . - . � � � ,. . . " . . . � �• ' � . - � � ' •
.\ � , . . .. . . . � � � - .. . . � . , �. .. � . . .
.. . ' :.:. � .. ., . . - . . , � . . .. . . t .
. . � . . . ! "'" ' >f . . . . - � . ' �
�:�i":, . ' . . ... , ... . � . . . • • .
' �w. . . _ .. ... . .
r�9j�n� • '
��
/ � ' •
r.� :' • ' ,- � �
r,.;. � . . . � . .
..�'..�. _,,.. .�.�:_ . . . ...:....._..�. . .�.__ . ..._...... . _,.;.,.......:�_�..,;�... ...�:.�_.....:�...�:.___.� r.___...._. �� r�
. .._ .. _ ____ .. .. . . � Y� bl;,
. ''-+7wr�yi,
�
' _7.
. G-�y 9s` 'rH� , ,.
.�.� .�,
,,< :;�:�
� BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMM[SS[ONERS �1,,' •
} c,
OF PITHIN COUNTY-ASPEN,COLORADO `� 'a:j
�:�:`. .
' . . : . � . ;�� '� .
.� } . r
' .. . . . . _ .. �,4
�-�:
MEETING RE: S[LVER APPEALING ADMINISTRAT[VE DECISION ���� �:
���^_
_ The public 6earing in this matter commenced at 5:00 p.m.on June 28,1995,in the District *-
Courtroom of the Pitkin County Courthouse,506 East Main Street,Aspen.Colorado. ��"
BEFORE TNE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: �'�5� '
- .. . . . - . . . � � . .��i
MICK IRELAND,CHAIRMAN , ;:=4 :
JAMES R.TRUE � -
...' , ,_
.a.:
` BILL TUITE y��:r�
.}�
WAYNE ETHRIDGE
Ethridge, Wayne
�
'- ' GarTield.Ron - , - ...:
Irelaad,Mick
McAllisteq Pat
Quinn,Deboreh
True,Jim �
Tuite,liill `�
- �
�� .
�4
_ `.` `.,,. .
_
'. �. ' . . , , , '-, '... . - . ' -
.
. , , .. .' ., ,
.'.. �.. . ,.. .: . . -.�. ' �1 �� .
t�
I h '�
I f�;
t' . ,
1 .�, ' ,
I +;., ��`:�
r a.
; �.� i '�
1
��.
�' ��� i�l.�.
I IK
_ � fi ��5,:
`,,. i . . _� �. I ' t� .
�+ I
'
�a
. . � . ..:. . ; ' . � �� �� .
�
. • . �
�
�1 F '�r � � n - � �1
� �''3� 45 � r '� X•i."�s
�_�� / _ _r aa v n _ �k,: -r:.'i
M1 r �r ��� .. ) ; i � 4-f� ti:
r i ��
�'' n1f� f,�yy7�Ha}0 t��� � � 4`�• ���.
� 1'n�4a�~°��Y.y���tii� ��. � �� � _ _ (��,� .
1 ,s� ��°�,�'En',A%��°e-�,d�i c � �� _.r. _
`�
� �...$.'a `�r�'t;;cZ{ f.^ ..!.+ t � .t
I ���T;�"�p�,�k`�.. ,� r ����� � + t
�,��- � , . �
Lx
,�; 4 '_ ,r» 5�'a f s a � � � (; '�.,� ..
�,,��� ry 1 ti-� ,� � ��.
y Nr d1�r� ✓� t. �
� F r P s #�� s � ��;R �
s� �,° �* " .���-� - '.e r .
c .v �' '`-.L' � _ ..
�� �
.._.:. �� . � � ,; .,,, .'.. � ' ..� ..._� ..._._.� � . ..: �' �. . .� :� .� _ . .. . . :....r��:. .
..w, , . •
a.
,
,.. .. . , .
._ . .
. ,
... . �.�..� a r "i.iaeLF�..�.1Y!'eettl.�'v�bll�6�M.YtI:WY«.WtaYRT1x�1Ml1' .
�d•. C_. :aU�t^ e.:Wra i.� . .... . ., . �e . . . . �; i;
� _
' . � . � . . . . . . . . ,l
rIi � . . . � . . . . � . . � H�� ;
. . . � � . . . . . . �Y''
� , . . . - . . ti. :
Thc following proccedings were hed and entered of record • x�
- QUINN The attomey for this client called me and asked about the procedure for continuance. ���f Z,.
E�
TRUE Ron are you going to ask for this matter to be condnued7 y.
�; ��:
_ GARFIELD I already esked that and was told it wouldn't be so. �7 >
. •?
�i
'- _ _ , I� ...
f}
KONCHAN Well,actually,Ron,I think what you heard is that Staff would like to ask the Board for i��'��"� '
Y.
some direcNan because my understsnding was you may be interested in the altemative staff commeM that f '
� . . . . ��:4:.�:
was made in the memo and it would be my opinion that some Boazd direction whether the Boazd shares
�` '
any of Staff s position on that ar is willing to entertain is a threshold issue that I'd like you to have as well r�'�
as our benefit of hearing before altematives are examined by the clients or your clienG
' RON ThaYs fine with me. I'm all for that
�;i.,: '
IRELAND I'm going to get right to that then.LeYs do hear thet and then wdll decided whether we
- —that either—we'll eittier wntinue table or we'II take a break and then it fiear if at length.The break is
� due.
` .
'IRUE I'm confused on that
.•,.'. ; t '
_ �. .
, .., .
,�
� IRELAND Well,if we condnue then wd Il take a break.
-�._: , : _
' KONCHAN I think we'ro going to head right into it '� .
, i.
. " .. - . � � . 'l;� �
, . . . . � �.�.i .
. . . . . � . . - � � � i. ...
.. . . . , . . .. .. . '��.� i ` .
1'RUE Yeah,I dan't think--
All ri IeYs hear it. I w':
` IRELAND P��+
i
� i ���'i
' "1
1C
-+'1.,-`�`^'+�-�., .:a.:y�: :�r- .,e t �'-r. ,_�; ��3 �,e� rT��'Y ,� ��..► � ..r
, „ . . ..... y.. . . ._ . .. , .
. �
. � . . - -_ . � ..
. ..� .�;: , . . . �,: .. ... -�., . ., ..::�� t.,�.�..
'� / � ,,�h a..
� .•;���*i�l• ,
� � �� y
= : j7 .. �. " .� ':� _
. �,` y� �.i N >
1 � F q �
_ ..f t � � ..�
k f 1r
,1 i , � _ _:;,�
; .
' 1 .,, ,:
,, .
. ,{ _ �
: ..
.:
.. , . �
..;
. , � .
- y '" _ - � _
.° . ..
,. s•
. f„ ''- .-�-, .�_. ,.r . ,._._ _a: _ __
� �' r
'�i7�+
..�• "
��'Ot� . :��+�:s�Ja9�J;:.. .�'�5cr,. .., 'w. `:u�_ ,:.�ar• .. ..._ ��f. �;�F i��.
� .rf.,t ri.
k
j �,
•,� �,y :��s
( KRIZMANICH Okay. This is an appeal to an administrative decision pursuant ro 4-1601 of the Land
;'- �
r�.r
Use Code. Basically,the app►icant,Marton Silver,last fall applied for a building permit He owns a home ''.';;��'�
.. __ . .�f,'.�-:y:.
in Lot 3,Block I, Meadowood Subdivision. He is represented by Ron Garfieid and Pat McAliister, .
The building permit application was denied in October for insufticient floor area available to the applicant "� !�, ;i
�':•; �:
,�..,`.
to do the additions that he was requesting. Subsequent to that zoning department denial,of the building
� pertnit application,Ron Gafield's office sent a letter hasically stating that they felt that Meadowood was "'r` '
� ::
approved as a PUD and under PUD procedures,which are now in Lend Use Code,it is possible to allocate 'j��'=�
of the Roor ratio,it says hem,with open space to individual lots. When the Staff roviewed this at the t�
r4:
administrative Ieve1,our response was that,yes,Meadowood was approved very similaz to a pianned unit ���
�9 .
development who was approved in 1965. We did not have planned unit development regulations at the ` �C '
,. h}.::
time. 'fhe concept with Meadowood was to cluster the lou on—use smaller lots to cluster the development
• and to create a large 29 acre open space parceL They did receive a variance back in 1965 from the Board '`
_ �
of Adjustment to vary the lot sizes end Yhe Board of Adjustrnent basically granted the variance on the
+
theory that the acreage for the lats was included within the enNre subdivision,so they granted a variance tn
lot siu. They did not,in that discussion,talk about floor area ratios and ultimate home sizes. The roason
for that is the subdivision had AF zoni�g which at that 6me was on�acre wne and there was no floor area
' ratio attached ro it so there was no reason for the County or the applicant,at that 6me,to discuss allocating F
;.
;
floor area to the various lots in the subdivision. So basically,while the Staff agrees that Meadowood is a 1
very eady attempt at a subdivision in that the lots were clustered,we don't agree that the floor area
. - �. - �i• '..
�' attributable to the open space was allocated to the individnal lof owners. So the bottom line is that we
`� �- can't support allocating that Floor area to this particular app(icant or all of the other home owners. There v
�
�
� are either 67 or 69 lots. Pm not]00 percent sure. What I got out of our GIS was 67 lots when basically I
i
d
� looked at the smallest lots in Meadowood and the lazgest lots given the exisring floor area ratio. � ,
i,`:
Meadowood was later down-mned at some point ion tt�e mid-70s,either`73 or`74. I could not find the
wning maps that were supposed to be attached to the resolution so I'm not absolutely positive of the date �,�
of the down-zoning. When it was wned to R30,a floor area ratio then became attached to ihe individual �
{ .
lots.ThaYs how iPs 6een developed over the years with that tloor area ratio. ' ���
1',
� . . . ' . � � . . - :i -�',� .
2 1�;
tI
1^``_ ,1
-4....
� � a��.a`�'�.,�i;�}t.�`2+��4d. a. �"ih �"tw � - xte^ ��- l�xr�=i�:t� . .�3aa:- ..�..�.a�rtd �
/_ ""TM�RUrn+lY+47�rr����r��n�« .M .is,r,.� .-�x,Y=d."..1,.+-. �`�k " i
. . .. . � . � . . � ✓
- � . . .. � � .. . ... � �. . ��. - y�.
' -- t�:L �
�, + � - � \
� c.
. . . . . � . �r. � .
. -f .. . � . , - . . � ^ .
� i , �
' . '. _ _ ,_ : _`_ '::r"—� _
/ `,
�; ' ' �
t�ly'�,�- : . _
;�. .
��'—:... .., --. . ' , .
,
. - _ , _ . _ _..._ . _ _ ��,j�s •:��,:
;. �•.
}
%a �:
� �. ,:
r•,.:.o
�Ei�;
� �'; -.'.
� Now,fater on,in the late`70s,the County did adopt a planned unit development ordinance and a part of �'� '�>
_ y � y�
that ordinance dces say that the Boazd may allocate floor area attributable to open space to individual lots. i g�
Z',�
And,in fact,we have done that in a couple of instances;7'he Preserve is one in particular that I remember +4,i -
1� i , s..
doing. However,that was part of an entice overall PUD plan. In this case,I don't Imow that we have an � � �`
� . � �..�7_.'r
__ _ overal(PUD plan for the subdivisions very standard. So at the administrative level,based on those facts, •
�R�,. .
the Staff did not support the applicant's request to allocate tloor area to the individual lots based on that i�'' '
.°►
' open space. t
'�, :
F"!. :
IRELAND I know the issues are clear, �
` ff Y
. � � . . . .. .. � ;y��.
. . � � . . . . ., . '.... . .
KRIZMAIVICH Okay.
� � - � � � � . . . � . � . ;�i:�
` ,IRELAND We've all had a chance to review t6e applicant's argument on this that iPs
intended to use the open space for building permit purposes and we see thaG But what I've heard at tt�e
outset of this discussion was that there might be an alternative if epplicant is interested in having us talk �;
aboui which is:
GARFIELD The concept is that Meadowood was a defacto PUD by the PUD rogulations in �`
}
place. I dodt think there is a dispute about that.But the conversations that we had with Francis were that
-�. .
��- we would mble the appeal tonight,go back to the Homeowners'Association,and see if they would have '�
�;
any interest in coming back and processing that Meadawood Subdivision as a PUD. And at that paint in
i.
"' timq it may be passibte for us to reach some agreement with atleast the planrting office relative to the
>t- �,
floor area rstio and maybe deal with some other issues that have come up with the Meadowood before �-� + ,
such as trails and so on and so forth and bring you a whole package. You've got plenty of time,you can '
� approve it or d�ny it but it might provide a way to tesolve this. Silver is not one. There are a number of �'
� '
�`'.
, i other owners thero that consider themselves similarly situated ro Silver so wdre willing to go back and sa �' '�;;!
.��s . . . . . ..
�� ._.� � . . . � . . .. .. � � ��:. .
I
I 3 ti I'.
� � �T�R"''�,G�+N�?+�`1x:�"��i�„sSAa�'�',',�°�`�an."'�ik1��C�����4 t �`��•-- �,.`: � i
i'� 4��
� _ � � - r� ���..
- . .� . .,�` , ��'tr ,i
, . � � (� ��� Y�5
\
_ . . � . - �.t -�. .. — t
. �,� . .� •` .
� ' " : � ' `t y 7 .. .
., � . . .. . . .. . ,....'... �
�. . � �" _ ;�'� . � � . � .. .�f� . .
. . -..v'. ' . : . : _�
t
. . _ .
; �: - � � � . ..�. � � . . , .
. . .�� .. . . . . . � : �. . - -� � �. . - � . .
� . � - . . _ - . � - . - i : � � . . . � .. , . � . . . . .
�� ^ . ,
�.
; ,� .
`�.,;� , _ , ,, , . ��;,
,� e
, I if we can get the Association Boazd to do that and then start back through the pipeline with an applica(ion, ��'��� �
if you're interested in having us to do that. if not,then we could proceed with the hearing tonight s r�• �
�!.4.:�
:�j . . � . � � `�1'�'+:
ETHRIDGE Would you be looking for an answer Wnight7
,,i•
J�t.
... � . . . � .. ,*� r
_,
. . �. .. . � � . ,�
� GARFIELD Some direction on which way we should go for this.
-- :_ �, .
��
��. :
ETHRIDGE Personally,I'm interested in having you bring it back here as A PUD. I'm not sure r`-
- - �:,:,..
_ what it would accomplish from a public standpoinG I undecstand the trails issue,but iYs not high on my I� :
agenda. Ron in terms of taking Staff time and egenda time for this particular issua � '.
,q;
''—, IREI.AND I'm interested in that and especially,I think that the trail link and the access through there �
�+
; ��
is critical and aiways has been end iYs a missing link. I wouldn't want to see your PUD design change
�
that into a,you know,15,000 square foot thing,but if we were talking a6out reasonable home sizes there
and so on,I am very interested.
GARFIELD Seq I don't see the risk in that requirement iYs a built out subdivisioa
- IRELAND No. Exactly.
i, •
, .
� .
•�. GARFIELD And so I see it and also I think that the—I'm sorry.
: �_�__r-.�.- � . � . .. . �� . . .
' . � . � . � . -.� ��
. � .. � . � - . . . . � � .:; �. .
IRELAND We don't have--we wouldn't have to approve a PUD that would altow for certaiqbig
� homes there anyway. �t;
�
I � .
� GARFIELD No. �.
.. .. - . . . � . � . . � � . . y: �i
� ti� :��.
4 �� �►,,
.� ;
z , .
: ; r ,::.
- __.� �. _ ., �
� , h
• � ,��
/ ' "1� * ♦
� ��'�.�,
' : ., ,. . � ,
' , .
-• ,�ri
7 _ f�
5 ;�' �� �- � �� ,f .� �
`. rt -�• �� .:+-�
i s } ! S
� ` i �� � 1 �
,
` i,: , ;� ::: ; : _ •
,
' . , ' ` ,!.
� �.
/
_ - .s[ - _ _
� � 1 ` .
. , -. .. .
���' ; - .
��. .
�(�}i::.��t.����.'Cya�'�":FFR'ti;L'.i'k ;�.e�...s.�,y� . .. . �m..�.'.Q� 4:.�.::e:_ , . . ^ .��� �''
! �l'.
. .�i . . � . � � . � . � �'�`
.�' . . . . . . .
;e� :
. � . � - . � . ��
IRELAND So we're not at risk by allowing that W wme back in. "
'y. .,
" , . ' . ri,;��
- -- ' .ai',s
GARF[ELD And I think the objective of the owner is gaing to be a lot more modest than what wdre
�4
fi
facing tonight What it is ronight is all or nothing thing. We're coming to appeaL If you deny us,then ,�Y s;�
�, r
wdre going m ask for a court to roview it If went on review,you're talking about a little more FAR than 'f�`a ,=
�.
'; anybody really wants up here,but its just that we're enshrined to do an all or nothing thing up there. �, :
' i ��.
I think a PUD has a lot of inerik `
{ a '
E�..:
GARFIELD Well,we're willing to give it a whirL I mean in theory,we could have E � 'Q� `
_�,.
- oar hearing tonight and sflll bring an application into the pipeline Wayne. 1 mean-
�
ETHRIDGE Sure. Wetl, you're asking for direcUon now.
IRELAND Well,I appreciate that. We've got rivo different directions,bufwe necd to hear some ,
more.
� :
CHILD I share Wayne's t6eorems about this. And part of that comes from the fact that my
memory of the 4,000 square foot subgrade exemption came largely from an appeal done in the Meadowood �
\ � I,
subdivision that—I'm sorry,not the Meadowood,but Mountain Valley that they be allowed that as a way
':}i,''�
1-` to not only ta increase FAR,but also to provide for some of the mechanical space needs and so forth. That ,
� was granted and I think thaPs an increase in FAR that was probably more then this Board should have
� � given at that time and I'm not interested in it And it seems to me that doing a PUD to resolve this issue ; F �
� would be really,in some respecis,a sham exercise and Pm just not inurested in indulging in that
I � !
: �
� .J- � � � � . .
. . . . . � . !, �
IRELAND lim? �:
�s;;.
�?
� ` '�` =
5 _ � f�}.
� t
��
_. .. : .. ,�: , . . ,,�. ,"
� : ,.-,�; ...:.,, ..` . �., :. ...
<•�- E.. �� <
/ ( 1 r Y r'� ` �ffTf�V^.-
S .
" ` i� •
, & :' ` �ry�
�"� '.M ':5 4 . `. ;t .•,{�
5I i .-. ..7 � 1 T_
. . ' �0�.'Y _ .rf _
, � 1 3'. - 'i t
t �
� '
E I
j� ;
� .�.: . . . ....
.
....'_ _ :� � . . .� :. ... .
.A �.. �: . � .::. . .
..�. : �.� .. .;.. . .�� �, . .� . ':.;. r. ��
`
- � ' -..�� � ,. .
+�.�-M . �� . .
�. Y ' , ,.`- .
�r� " _ .
,.,x. " , - .
,�
• � .1.. �. .. I , ���;Pla�� r�'��E,.
'�, ..:.atiE�tr..ti�511�..'elJ'�=:.. S'�7.t�.cN.�.. _ ..1� Ra,:� , .. -�'� ... ... � Y�,'�.tiS�}�- y�::
. �,
i �'.:. .�T4�k�;�
�'.��
^-.:�:
TRUE The reason Bob that I would disagree that it is a sham exercise is because I do think 6','^
�'�: 'y ,
there's some public benefit that might be obtained,as Mick mentioned, with treil issues and the �~�'�':�'3
-� i�,"� '
Homeowners'Association should be aware that when we take this back to them that,of course,the top of += y`%
:c
the bill could make the final decision but if you do discuss this with the Homeowners'Associatian tfiat �w� ;s.
� r
' would be one think that I'll look for but I think theYs what was approved back in 1960 whatever. Now,I �f�`-�
I
. :_ � . . a�� .
— agree with Mick that it will be a Iittle difticult {��
,f.�S�
��f::;�
i _
71JITE Thank you Jim. Okay,IePs play what if. We dodt do a PUD. We say we're not '
_,�
interested in a PUD,where do we go from here? We make a denial based upon there is no existing FAR, "q�
it goes to court. What authoriry does the coud have in this case. Can we be giving something that we � '
'''.�
dodt really want by the courts. And if iPs something that we really don't want to takq eat,however you
� 1 want to put it,do we lose something? I think we can. On the other hand, on opening up the PUD, I , i��
mean,you know,who are we kidding? Mick and 1im,you want a trail easement,iYs going to be a quid pro
' quo,no question about it. And what thaPs--thaYs going to be more FAR in ffiat subdivision. The �
question is how much moro FAR in that subdivision are we willing to allow for the benefit of the traiL ';�
And you know,Cm sorry,thank you guys,I am in the middle on this because I see pluses and minuses on
• bottt sides.
.. .. , . . �� . . � 4j.. .
. s
ETHRIDGE One of the concems I have,is the statement getting made that it dcesdt matter,that iYs
built out We used to think that about Red Mounqin roo,that Red Mountain was built out. And
��. "�
Y Meedowood,I think,is probably going to be the next area targeted for the StaRer Castles. Sq Cm y,
, concemed about it and like Bob,I'm—you dodt start this process assuming yodre going ro be that even 't
i on FAR and I think thaPs heading the wrong diroction for this communiry. So,again,if Ron is looking for r: •
i,• .�•..
i direction tonight,I think we ought to--if we did get an adverse mling,I think to answer your question, : a
we'd change the Code. That's the worse thing that can happen to us. We can go back and change the
�;
i Code and deal with the zoning in Meadowood. I'm not that concemed about that. [n terms of FAR, we
� �'i
. . � . .. ''?.�.
' can deal with that issue.
�� �i . . � . . - -. .
�i . . � . ' . . � . �I��, .
f.
6 11 �I.:,
�� i
- 4 •
� f�
. Y
,
.. , ., _...- ., ..- . ..._.. , �s.r., a.�;...: �..� ' _' ' �i
. .._ ..� ._ ._.
, .:
, „ � �
.,. .� y,a.4.:.... x✓.sXS�Siaw+-_..s'�`��-w- -��S+i:'�-�+„"tle�"Aaaia� , --:;_. :.. .. ��r S .
` / ' 1
Z 4
, `:� }` 4.'.
. . . . . -' �cb u . J
� �:,. '" . � t `L �♦
, � � . . . y J .. — ����,
. 1; . ,� .. . -j .. .
. �I . . .'� �. .
.. '..���` � . .. . •� � � .
I �
. . . .' . . � . . � � . . • ... � .� .. .
•�
.. _ _ . is� . . � - - . . � , . . . . . -
- . � . 1 �.. ....._. . .�
. �� . . , . .. ... .. . . .. : .
t��� . • . . _ .
�
`f. .
��'
_ , .
, , �� ��1� &,� .
. ,
' ���,;.. ,C..��7e1P.6iw��i.'... •kLlR17"•�: ... �0`3.- F:u. ,. . ... ..,r ... d�f:r'lt:..A�.A^r_t�.tA.mw.r�,�r,a�.:.n.•w._«..-...r..�.: ^
� � �.
'f'�-t3� ��,..
('.
Y ��
. � . ' . T. ' �.
t �•.:. :p .,�i:
1 '��
� . . . i.�r. '..
_� ;'fii•j:,y ,
IRELAND But what we have the opportunity herc to do herc,is to talk with the homeowners r y.;.r ,�a
r
directly about a realistic house size catch, We don't—our choice,if we they come back and say we'll 'cii?''.y�:
� give you a trail easement but we want an FAR to permit average house sizes 10 or 15,we'd give a no d�ere. �w.i-:� r
j .,f .; ';'
- ( �� �
ETHRIDGE Well,as you know,I think yodre should be talking about thaz outside of a quid pro quo. � ,
. . - I 4-.�..1...'�.
� . . � . � } �" •
. . . . � � . (.�"
j IRELAND I know. But this is an opportunity to talk about this direction of the neighborhood and E
. I ::.
maybe make—make something that's allowed some more FAR but geu us something that we want '�,
. � ��
because that neighborhood,the way[look at it,whaPs going to happen there is that people pass nn or � ,
s .
descend—Jeave town,that neighborhood will,like Cemetery Lane and like Mountain Valley,be built out ":�
.rfx.
to the maximum permissible FAR under regalation. It will become second 6omes,by and large,not `
,�
`: j exclusively,but as neighborhoods trend. And t6is is an opportuniry wherefore before that happens to work
towazd a finat result that is better than that,that has more public benefit than whaYs going to happen if we �
�
just sit back.
r-,^.:
+��Y'�'.,.
ETHRIDGE Wefl,the trade-off;and of course iYs a trade-off,what kind af PUD are we talking about.
_ I mean,this is all the concept. We dodt have any idea whaPs coming in and it's going to take stafftime. I
think to resolve a minor issue,I think we'ro going to go through a PUD to jam up the agenda,jam up our �
•��� ,`
agenda,and not hsve it, I think,a real exercise because we dodt even know what kind of fee we're going � `•
to get. If the trail is an issue,there are other ways to get it If the easement is an issue,there are other ways �.
, .. . . . . .. . . �{i� .
to secure that easemrnt,without going through a PUD and deal"mg with the FAR issues. As Bob has said, ;,�
` ' this Board has been extraordinazily generous,I think,with FAR I don't believe thaPs the issue and t
j':
�
certainly dodt want W see it rise. �' ',
iRE1,AND But there's an oppoctunity to analyze what the situation there is,you know,ihe everage �.
Y.4..
house size,what the potential build out is if we do noffiing,and what the potential build out that they want � . �',�
: ��1
. � . . , . . - . . . �s
� � � � .� . � . � . . 7 . . . . . . +
j .. . .. . . . . . : .. � �S .. .
.. I'-+W4w x-•�°. .� i..' .. . ._ .. T� f
�i. e �:+t� •��a� tr -°r •'�5:. �
. -;lw"��+'�f+s�'.`'w�..'�,T*.�1�'.9'+�'�'•t`I�'��L.'��uY T
.
_
. . . .. .,.. . _., ... _.. , .. .. , ..
.>. . . ._ .. . . ,., .' .. � u
.�_.., .. . .:.. . ..:,. . .; r.,: _... ;' .�_ . �-. ;��'� , �.�• , ' .
��
� . ...� .. _. ♦, . .� r. n. .
� k }
�� � 1
.' `' � _ ,� , �
. . .'.- ��. . .�.�' "...��.. �.'.�'- . � '. ..
\ �,• `
�� . t �'� , .. ! r 'J` .
r , ,
,.:. . �.�..:'� ' �.:..�". , . .' . ' ...-.� �. .. .... ,I. _ ..... ., .. � '� . . . '. ';.
- - y .r.. ` ..
�: - ' _
�9�n . - . - .
�� -
� . .
�� a. .-s:. T.... ...._. , . . . � � . ��- � . . � .. �. .,....... � � -
. .. ... .. ....__�.. .J .��..._..._...�._........_....�.�..f"nt .n.;�r:,
,�y�.. �t ,2��:.
ri.
,
. . � . *};' �.
. � -�� ;:�'+�X+�
��•i.
is in retum for some public benefrts like the trail rezoning. And I don't think that's—I dodt think that the ?��..''=g
. rY.,T.�. .;
trail issue is a minor issue. I think that is,of all the trails segments in the community,that is the most y, ,��`
critical thing. �E,�� ..
�, Z,�
. ' . .. . ',y�
� . . . . �r �..5,.
ETHRIDGE I don't necessarily disagree with you but I think there are ather ways to securo it without �?��.„�,� �;r
_ _ going through a PUD process for a subdivision that's already built,thaYs my point Mick. �Y � .
_ � �
.�_
IRELAND I understand your point but there are—there is potenfially in a PUD process,for �
exam le,to rovide for the affordabte housin that Utat nei hborhood couid subse aentl a' '
P p g g q y generate,when .
it becomes second homes, and we dodt have that opportunity now. Thero are a!ot of opportunitees there ��Y� 'r ,
. �a:..
and I'd like m do it
',�f:
. . . . . . '..r
. . �. ' � . � . . . .is
ETHRIDGE Is that what we're talking about Ron. Aro we talking about affordable housing and wdre
;
! talking about a significant benefit at this point?
;
� '�
GARFIELD I don't have any authority. You know ihe dialogue with Francis took place at � ••
_ early this morning,so iPs not Formulated at all. The only thing I can say on that is that you get going ffiat
way we get too backsided because the first will be to look at the PUD,if you dodt like it,you can deny it
�.
and I'm not even sure-I may be back in a month to tell you that I can't get the support for an application
.� that will address these issues and then(uninteiligible) �
;� l;
j :'
ETHRIDGE But if we did an affordable housing and some other issues other than the irail,that it ,�
might have some appeal to me. But if it's just a trail, you know,my position—
e: .
IRELAND But they're tafcing that risk,we're not. They've got to the homeowner's association,they
ot wme in with the a ment,the ve ot to come in and fees for the same rocess and if the re �,
g P Y Y' B PaY P Y' •�
_ ' willing to take that chance and we're getting &ee look and I like the idea of having a free look It never � �'_��
. . . . . � . i. . �F
. � 1� . . � � � ' .. . . . �.
J � . . 8 . . . . . . 1:
1 ... . . . . . . ' .. ' I ..
'.. ..�.., . .-�. . .r t;"' lr.:..,. .;, _ � . _. _ 1
� . . / :C' .. 1...,i. .:-'s8-`� k
�
1
't;, a �''•*�}
_ x t'��3+Y�rAr'��<r�.v;.�*,,x#!4f�'a�.�a'�C.���i'��� , . ��i�
�.� � j ,y:
{ f �
� � �'�''i
� �
, ��.
t y { E
� ,`+` t
1 ;�. �.
;;
. .
,,..
_ : _ :. � � ., .. ; ;,;
:. ,: ..: ,
,. . ,`_
, .
� :
, ._ _. ..:_ . .
,. - ..,.: ..,t._, ,
, . � .
� _ , .
��� .
,i.A. . � . . . . . . .
.�fr.. •
.1A'.n.:�'. ._�+�6L_'�:t9iK'tJt� � M�[;.'.r '^ .. ��%9 o°v:'.<�-�� ,. `rlt-.� '_��__,..'�- . . .si� �
� 1 ��' ���
�::�
;!�..
ceases to amaze me what people come up with if you've never bought it and they might come up with '< ��
•;�. � � � .� r: ••
something thet's just great forever. They might not, but thaPs the worst that can happen. We say no and �'-�`�
` - we have this hearing at a later date. That was the game and I lost. r ` y-'�
;i,.. ,:.
. ':;C,:..:�.
�.
,fi s:
�., lr
TUITE . Well,now hearing from the middle again,okay,Pm willing to look at a PUD. But this is �`� a
, =�:
=— my wncern. The most vocal neighborhood of anything that's been done out thero has been the `'�� `'
' .i .r�
Meadowood Homeowners. When iYs come to employee housing,when it's come to RFI'A,when it's �'�� '`
come to the hospitai and these peaple have squealed and tfiey've objected and we reduced the size of �" •
.�:
homes so,you know,altruism is one thing,realism is another. 1 guess Pm going to side with this side of �Y�; ...
the table tonight and say IePs see what we have,but i am going to be skeptical abou[it I'd like to be � �
;-'�''
pleased and proven wrong,you know,but I would like to be confined on what the expectations ere. Maybe
we dodt even need an applicatioa Maybe in the pre-ap this gets settled right out. But what you want or i'�}
whet they want,not you and I,but perhaps the Homeowners'Associadon would like is not going to be
acceptabte,and we go the other route. Well,maybe you do a parallel track so IePs try—your—iPs on �
your dime and you're willing to go there,great. But,I have concerns.
� , . . . . . � '''E
GARFIELD I represent an individual tonight and I am prepazed and I know some of the Board
members of Meadowood and I will go back to them and I will make this presentation and I will say this �.,
f.
_ f
can't be a one-way street I mean,if yau're going to come in here and you want to make a proposal,then
you'ro going to have to consider the issues on the table so that will get the interest of the Commissioners
� :.
— and if I can't get that,then Pll be back for my hearing. �;
�, .�I �. . � � . .. � . . :1 .
IRELAND All right ''
_ �_• �j
_ I
GARFIELD And Mick,can you give us another date in August,August,give us an August dateT
:.�'
�.
IRELAND Of`95? ;-t i �`I
� : . �'. =
�1 ,1
f`;
9 ft I'';
i
,l �
�` I at�ir�ar�`i���` " fi'�~� o
,` "� w@�'*�ak�i� �• � t
� � �
/ �
' x'.
� 't �
�
� . �'` .
\. ':s ` .{ + S
� , : �.
; : -. .�.y,''z
' c -.-.' , ! . ' .
/ �s;,� s: �
i ' .
l i '�
; .
t '
_. , e! -- . �
�. , }
: �,�7� -
` � .
r s,T
r�r r���' �'.��[ �'Y ar n r�'ir- ' ..1.�.. . �''� y raK,,
' � h�,�•._�s F�v._ .m,:'+�' ,y
�
;
- ,� .
�� �
' �1�.
. . .. :: � . . . . ' . .� 't'T'S b. •
ETHRIDGE For this year7 � � ' �a
_ . . . . . . .... fii,! �;i.
...
� � . . . . � . ��� .
/�;
� GARFIELD Yea "� s�
� . � ;..� i�
�
�.�,.�
— .. . . . . t�,�..'c
ETHRIDGE Of this hearing:Just so you dodt lose— ': �?
����
. . . . . . 4'�'�`•
' . . � . . . . . S
�,-'i " . . ' . � � .
,� GARFIELD Yeah,because by then I'll either table it or we'll be coming in with an application and ``� �
, -< .
I'll want to do a hearing and get it over with. ��M1�
'�1'' .
-. � � � � . � . . .�. _ . � i, s'-. � �ro':
. . � . . . . . � � .a�- ..
- . . � . . � . . . . . � .:a:-
TUI'fE Okay. I'm sorty,Ron. Jim just reminded me and the school. That was an issue fliat `,:';�'
Meadowood has been very vocal about I missed tt�e school. Thero is another one,but whatever. � �
,x�:
,�
11 ETHRIDGE Let's not forget the strucwre or the approvaL ��
y�
r� •
. KONCHAN August 23rd would be all right.
IRELAND August 23rd t,
GARFIELD Thank you. �"
A; ,
- ,!.
IRELAND And we'11 put that in the regular agenda,duty notice it end then carry on from there. 'I:
i �, I
� . . . � ' . R'` .i�.
GARFIELD Can we just continue the hearing at sometime7 �
i .�,
KONCHAN Yeah,iPs not a public hearing so. �
i �r
:$ ' !�.
' Ii '�,
10 `f {,�;
l� i ,
,; �. _ �+rrk
> _ � f ky.`
✓ '`l .�. � ��r ' :� f
. \ t'�E"'7�` ''.' �� � .
4 ^e t � ' L
rt r . 1 � - 1
1 � ,�: �Y ..- �� '.f !
�\ � 5 S ��` K .•� .. .
� ' l .,' �r I'e.
Y v � - .♦5� .. ,
3�4
y - _..6�F � � _'
� :1�1,Y _' .
� � � ,
.
� .:� . .. � . . .. .
. ,�,: ' ' . . .
. , , .
:� _ �
..,. , ,, ,_, . ,
�
� �'v.�M.., i�,i+�•a����. ' . e".. . .��.k _ , i�:'�.. .� l�: .'� .�a.tifR:.c�'�� �y .�y,,..
'e
. . . . . . _ . . . ' .��) .
. , . . '� '�JF
. . �.� . . � � - '' �_..
GARFIELD Righk �; ^-.;.
. . . . . . , . .. . . .�i� ': ,
. ... � . � . �. . . .. . �y�.ir. ti,.�.
_ � . . . � . . . .. �:: ...
IRELAND Right 4::F i.
: jc
i�
J,.,� s.
, a�� �
GARFIELD 'I'�ank you.' `a�'��i
k�
- � _ � .: � ,��_M1.X�,.,a
� : . . �. � �. � � . . 1 '..�.7
' .> . �. . . .� . ...'
' -'. TRUE I mave to table the action. :�`�
� . . . � � �. . I 'Ft
_ . . ' . � ' I ' �..�.-$ .'�'
IRELAND To date certain August 23rd7 j-� ��
> � "f3:: :
.� . , .�., .�.. . . . . . , :�. . .'. I `. :." .: :Y..; .
. . . . I'i �� .
. � .. . . � .:Ay..��.
TUITE < And conHnue the pubiic hearing7 - .��
if
.:��
� IRELAND IPs not a public hearing. 7Ys a land use acfion. i'
' 1� _*'
�
GARFIELD ThaPs good enough. t ' .�
. � . � . . � . . � . ��r�4
IRELAND All right. All those in faJor of continuing to date certain,tabling and conrinuing,so ; ;;
; .
signify by saying aye on True's motion and Tuiu's second. Ali in favor,say aye? �,-
'\,_ I'' '�,
° i'
TRUE Aye.; . ,.
;� �
, i;
TUITE Aye. �%
r'
IRELAND Aye. Opposed7
�,
CHILD Na �
���
- � � �� � � '`, �.i
� �
� :�`
� �'
11 ,� ) � 3'�.
; � � �
�i . , . .. � �L.i�
,1 ,::.�,�� ;
\ � '
, �
; , � , ` � ` �, � 'a-.
�
<; , :;,�' � �,:�
,
-R ` `�x` : �3-tfS,= .
s�y¢.A.'� .4 � � ` � ` r :``S`sx .
1 , ;�t�.,��r�.4'b� ��. r �. s ty i=f ' -��� „" 1 . , '�7'
. ! +ik��� 4 i� .�1 � �:! � , �, Syr � � �
.��°� 4'��� � �. `S t�' <:itst J `
1 � � �, _ �/ ir
� , ��.3 s (.� 'f T 1 �i!Z ,� s
..;\ I ,7y�f$?�tL �� " ;�7 I '.
� t {
tJSyy.'aPj�Y�' '
�'j'Ci S�Z \ �� �� � -. � .
�. E ty Y A ., xT . �' .
�" a r�� �. w - f . .
�rT w� � ' �!�,� _ �. . ..
_
�a F
i
�� 1
`�Y� . .. � � I+ . , � . . . ..
,�. .
. . . . J . � . h '
' �r.fL���l� �f�A:}4�.,���•'A'��# . � tf�I��M'���.���fl� . . . . . T
�C � � � . � ... . .
. {
(.3,i
. . . . .. . .A'.
��
ETHRIDGE No, i.� �.
. .. . - .r. .,
. . . . � .. . �«r .�ya j.
s'y
- � ... i:; �' Z�i:
- � IRELAND Me too. . , ^,c •v
. �. �. . � !Y`� ::5;.
r4
�a� . )
� [END OF TRANSCRIPTJ. - ,��
st�.
,-�,y•
- t 4
•�•�
:.,:
��''
.�i��' ' _';:. .��', _ :. �: .;., . ". �.1
:�.•'
�;
�,: �... . .. .,-. , _
�.
::Y
) � ��
. . .: :'. ' � .. ' '..
':.`��' ' � �..� . ��.. � �..: �' .-.:... : .
I
^,j
n!.
\
�.i J
`
r�� ,�'
:� ;
�
, ,
,.•
i
:� �:.
,'j � :
� "-+ , *��
4
�'� � 1.
� �;. , :.
�'! , (;i
'�- , I F
12 �'� �� 1
} w�
'� -
f: ��: r 2 'a.,�,�`,�,�' �` . .�a
' x�:
° .,� C�"l��r."��Y ,�. �c ,�; - a �. r _ k ;'���� ,
� � '; F 8=S ''''y�����'��t�-� . �J.. i f 1 } � . ,� � , .. 4 ,. C ��
� ,.� y-' '�S 4��''�'+���a '�`�.u� fi � � .. ,y„ w. �d � �^ s . ��y � .
_.'4;t j�"'a" �$7���4."���,4 i.,.�.., f� : � � � x � � � �_ i �i 6
yt,'���A��.tXy�'&M�� P '� t'� ' r .r. 4 -,�.,� �� c� � . 3. � 2�� t �
1 ':�� .��.��.'�'�,��� y�°'�*�� 'e °t � ..-e + ; i 5+y r r�",y _ t�
. , S . i
.;� { . ,L � e..�s'w-r�}�p:�'1 ... ., r s � f � .`� , .-.. -
';t�. *"Y . 'J+'�`„ $"GS `F`x c; � �C _ ..f 1� �
�1 � S�� ��}�fy�r[`'�11YR�'ti �� � t} r ��I **t '^ ' � •
�,�����a�y����/,. i:9 7 �� 1, f � ..
_:. �.. ��c�}^.y_C.$'t\ii'$9'�`:}'£#Ew , w{ fr H � 1 ?-,' Y t .. .
*
6!"4�` Y M 2�,� '. +4 Z� ... ' �. , �' .
/ - 'r*b .,��dt � a�s"i,M ,' `G � 3't 7 L � s ,. �: S'� �
�
:�� .: � +t 4 �r, ,�?� � ., r 3� +��+c+,� �'` ` I ��-
t
:t �+ 1; l 1 � � `
� � t � ti
. ��.�, ' ' . ' �
, .
.:,,. - .
�'uC r. ,.�_„-_.T...__...�.. � � ^
,. __ . , , � _ .... . ..__.._y.:,_..._._ . :_ :--" �— � ,.
. .._ ._.. ���1�t k'fr/
� .:i: _ . ' . �.
.. .. . , . . . .�
: Tt���AsP��' � i�::��
: TtM��
: ...
. �_..:;.
_ Box E ry '
Aspen,Colorado •�
x� ':y.n
PROOF OF PUBLICATI4N � �,�
_ . s;:
� r
STATE OF COLORADO) � �-�a ;
-- -_- )ss. Copy oE Notice ,t ;
E � •.
County of Pitkin ' ) '� '
�r
� .
1,Lorere Jertkirrs do solemnly swear that I am the �� �.-
Publisher oF THE ASPEN TIMES:that the same Is a week- ;.,.q, ,
ly newspaper printed,in,whole or in pad,and published
In the County oE PitkiM State of Colorado,and has a gen- 'fq
eral circutation therein;that said newspaper has been �, ..� .� , � ti , �.':
published continuously and uninterruptedly in said `'��"�"�' '�' �rb'nce .•.
County of Pitkin,for a period of more lhan fi[ly-lwo con- ;��,�''���"'��"�gy!�!"O�'�'':�
secutive weeks next prlor lo the Eirst publication of lhe '"�'��'a�+'�`�+�!��: '
annexed lesal nolice or advertisemenh,lhat said newspa• '.���eo.enmusm_�ed�u,�: {
ea:.a'dce�n.�;aw�ca�n-�
pez has been admltted to the Onited States mails as sec- fe,;,,��.�,�,��;b���; �i;
ond class matter under the provlsions of lhe Act o[March ■ca�i�■ua.i.ubaui�a er.'ae��M,ok.Y,:•
.rwuewtlot�vP�?�'br m aawne det�eAed-�, �
3,1879,or any amendments thereof,and thit saed tiews- ��,���,�.�,.�b�.�m
paper is a a.weekly newspnper duly qualified[or publish- +S 51�Honrih«rnnn;�.op iz,.00um�K ;'
. .Rridin.Par Elrlhec Nk�mMlmi mM�Y Flm"'. .
mg legai notices and advertisements with the me�ning of s�.��rM:;pv�rr�wAc�dwo�.a�.'
the laws of the State of Colorado. `opoiotDepihe°"`.� �� =
ud�.dcu�rna4a�:� .
i �-�. ew.aorcw�acomm4.laoe..:
That the annexed legal nolice or adverlisement was pub- °u6qiAed1o11iMpe1�"01J0°"���1� �``�s
lished in the regular and entim issue of every number oF --�� -`" " `''
said Weekly newspaper for the period of 1 consecu-
tive insertions;and that the first publicalion of said nolim
was in the issae of said newspaper dated
�,E '�,�_A.D.,19 Q(� and lhat the last pub-
lication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper , t{.,
, dated�_A.D.,19�_. �
,
� •
:�'. :�``
.. � . . � .� � � � . . � .. .� . .;r
. . � . . . � . . . � �� .
Subscribed and sworn to before me, o notary
_ public in and Eor the County of Pitkin,Slate of Colorado, , �.
, on this�(Z_day of A.D.,I9 g�.
. . . � - . . . .. .. � . . . . . Y:
.. ' . . . . . . . ' . . . k � ,
Nolary PuU ic
:`` My commission expires �"Q�9�-
y�i y� `V �:
1
7: �}� ' . � � . �.
. ��4�� i'� _ . 4�,
� � � . ` I � ' • � . - � . . . t��..
� ..�r'' ¢,�� , . � � . � � � . � ;� :"f':i
�� - . ... . . . � . -
, ;.G,Q.a �� :.
-^ ,��1 .. E, ;,
..y...•• ,�P.
� . � i
� . . NO� �
� �
j���;���
. �n�
i'' �.
� � .
� ,
_.. : .�-. ,., . . ,, ... r • _. ... . '�..; r xt
� ,
�
. � � � ..y � � '. �
.1 . . � . . � � _ . �� .
. . .� . ..�,.
`' r
` 1 ,� !
,
, .
.
� _
_ . :�: _. � .
._, , . . _„
. ..
� ,
j�-�� _ - '
�. , " .
. . . . ^ ,
_a�,�',r,� , _ . � a sui��m�mae�,wr+aw y N
� .....�'_"�.�.�_ _ ....w. ..r......w.�Aw�w.wa61f1A:ti�%[�YJA"Rf 'J�j
!. R�a
' 1 � . . � . . ' . .. �.3 'p�%,
. `f� . . . . . . _
� T�t��As��N � � . `:�
. � Tt ��
M
.r
, . . . - . ,sa �.
BOX G �*�
- Aspen,Colorado ��
_ ti�
� PROOF OF PUBLICATION �
• STATE OF COLORADO) � '
_ )ss. Copy of Notice
-_. "'�'
Courity of Pitkin ' ) ,�,:,
Y'<
I,Lorat Jenkies do solemnly swear that I am lhe 4 �.
Publisher of THE A5PEN TIMES:that the snme is a week-
ly newspaper printed,iry whole or in pad,and published � �
in the County of Pitkln,State of Colorado,and has a gen-
' eral circulation therei�;th�t sald newspaper has been '�'�
published continuously and uninterruptedly in s�id
County of Pitkin,for a period of more lhan fifly-lwo rnn-
_ �secutive weeks next prlor lo the(irst publication of lhe
annexed legal noHce or advertisement;that said newspa- ��9•;�•s t,r,x�r,r,.,,»,..„z a: +
per has been admitted to the United States maits as sea �,,,��,'�'�':`�'�"�'"'�'�'�"-0 `�;�F u ? �
��,xr��a�+aa..��-,�-�i:
ond class matter under the provisions of the Ac[of Marcli t ��s,awa�s�ar�iebwr�Ys�cuarMr:
3,1879,or any amendnients thereof,and thal said news- ���a�Y!%�+�■w��w�
ew
�av4'wGWa�rV J�o.�21t�19%Y:.�
paper is a a.weekly newspaper duly qualified for publish- .���o,n�,00 :roa�cet� ,.
. ing legal notices and advertisements with the meaning of �oindo1��"'°°°'��°°'- !
�*oom;_'S06 B YUo SI:AsP�in ccooe�lder an`';:-
� lhe hws of the Stale of Colorado. +nw!a[roo weeuua er►ac��,ea:uneew. ,
. . . � C0404��ntlnt�ORavV IOIl:ANiCI1W `: �
. � �'erahk"s d�rdl4i/unlFln ao ehtYy�tiun 7Ae :� . . � � .
That the annexed le al notice or advertisement was ub- °`°°°"'°1ooltd"ol�s xo"°r°°°"'R -
' lished in the regulagand entire issue of every number of ������tinw�im ,
said Weekly newspaper for the period of�_consecu- �°°�°�`�°P°"°t0i�"'°"0t�' '�
r ; ?:n�+�d.�c ur.oa,cmv :
`tive insertions;and that the�cst pubHcation of said notice � is ea.ewca.nrc�r.�e.. �
was in the issue of said newspaper dated -��idhtl1e'�P`°�tlq1�'n.�s�s..�'
�_A.D..19�_ and lhal lhe last pub-
lication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper }�
dated�.�_A.D.,]9 9�_�. •
,i •
� ..
�
,,� : Z;
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary
public in and for the County of Pitkln,State of Colorado,
_ on this 3 p day of A.D..19 S�. ,
� ' �.
Notary Publ� ; . ..
� My rnmmiss[on expires 4'Q-4�"
, ;
, i
,�� J 0�,, 4,
. 0
���C�S: `� � �.t
p ' �_
,�� C� ---1 . 4
� , c��C �� �' �Il
.i . �1.. \' . . . . . . . . � 1..��1,.
•�:'�. �E.:.' . � . . � . . . . . _ � � � �,'
,� l l� � . Not1� i� �
���4���,s;a��e.����;v�.�,j ��
� �� �
� ���
' � ° .,
� �
� :�' �,.�
1, ,� f : �
; :; ,;.r`� �
\ ' ,. - , .;
, ..
�,
, , .
- . ,. . •-
. ,- � _
_ ; � . ..:: . ;. ._., _ _._
-r- - . --f--, - -° .
� . _ ,
,��;� _ , � ,
.F - .
��
r9''",' � . .. -..... .. . . . .. . .. � . . , _ ' .._......i...��...".+caMwttAxAM.�r'Mbn.Wt}WA6'7MJWL4l1'^? n
— ... ... . . . . ��If.��'If:
,� .
c, � y�
� ' '
! �, �y
: T�t� �sP��t TtM��
� .
�: �� .
,- � .
Box G `, 5
. Aspen,Color�do •, °
i�+;,;
e;:�:,::
PROOF OF PUBLICATION � �;'
STATE OF COLORADO) �x� r
___ )ss. Copy of Notice �„
� . � . . . . �:F� ::.
County of Pitkin � ) �4�'.
�
1,Loru�/eakins do solemnly awear that I am lhe t ��
Publisher of THE ASPEN TIMES:that the same is a week- `�? "
ly newspaper printed,in,whole or in pad,and published ,� �
in the County of Pitkin,State of Colorado,and has a gen- nr *'> � � � .�h
eral circulation therein;that said newspaper has been ��'�"`-`���'`'�N°"�$�`'�'�' '� ;
x�l'eveatanhdrr�x7ff�loMOF�vES1fa::
published continuously and u�ilnterruptedly in said p��mrrs�'s"�'*� "'�� '�'k��?'+r }: a: :
Count of Pitkin,for a eriod of more lhan C�[l lwo con- N°T��°��`�1°'�`piDOc"°'� ` '�'
__ secutive weeks next pPor lo the first publicaiion of the :���p�+��-0? ti+�w{' •
m.macwoac«�uaoaQ.,�:v�c�-
annexed legal notice or advertisemenh,lhat said newspa- t m,m,soc e awo u:r,�.6en co�o�.iea��,, +
er has been admitted to lhe United States m�ils as sec- '�°nte°ai°e1LLad°�'Dio�`"°°°''°�1O'' '��
P �w•�r�ya�a:w.ve.c.avmnm-:;
- ond class matter under the provisions of the Act of March a�:!�ay c.�:iai!�v,ro•rt�+ ,
3,1879,or any amendments thereof,and lhat said news- m;�,°°"°"�,��,;°yy,,�� '.
paper is a a.weekty newspaper duly qualified for puUlish- wr��+���!:���� �
Subdh7�loo.For 4dtha lolo'm�tbo coot�el �,
ing legal notices and adverlisements with the meaning of s�rr..�.�nvK�uadco�_:
• the laws of the State of Colorado. °'nrD""''°0°�De���.�.J9�10� � "
Ei �*�.l3W�-TP"'^Gtr�L�'�'� 9
� fYM�' ��a�,�, ���� . . . .�� .
ThAt the anneaced lega)notice or advertisement was pub- "�"hed1°TM`"'a°�°"°'"i°'�'�``°
lished fn the regular and entire issue of every number of
said fqeekly newspaper for the period of S_coiuecu-
tive insertions;and that the Crst publication of said notice
was in the Issue of said newspaper dated
��_A.D.,19 9S' and Ihal the last pub-
_ lication oE said notice was in the issue of said newspaper
, dated A.D.,19 g�. ,
;� . � :�
,.
- ��
Subscribed and sworn to be[ore me, a notiry �'�
•� public in and(or the County of Pitkin,State of Colorado,
- on this�O day of A.D.,19�_. • I
� � � C �
,
Notary Pub ic n �
Mymmmissionexpires'l���l
� . 1 h/��� . . �' � �I .
..) � �y:�J Oy/� � ' . . . ... . .. 54:..
i r Ar� .�C. . . .. .
�3: �_a,�'�� , , �=s
•:.- r� �� i.
; � � ,
��
� ��- �_� ;�`..
• ;�� �ao,� ' � , �
� , �oN� :�j
� �4 �F�.'As/r�i�1/ � �C�a+yr5u�a� j�et
x� I y
. _ 4 .. ,.y 'a
�
. . ` ` ,.'', �
. . , .y 'r+'." - �
� 1�.t
, ' •'
. . . _ . . . -�! � .
. !�. . :. .. ':�'
. �, .;. .-� ..�. ...
�"� . �.. �_ __ . .,.. _.�_ . �: -,-,. :. "- �� � . � �
, ... . � . -- - -�-+- . .. .. ...- � .' :..� . . - � .
. . , .. , . : � .�, . . :�... :.. ..
�R , . � � - ..._ .
r��'� ' • .
,��
�f., I
'� -
, • ^ -
_.
, .
.
r,
.. . ._ ' ,_ . .�...�,�a+�.�,�weenrmin�rtYwAa86i:iL�i!!'dn�� �v`
��.
';
. '� �
'`4;
, . .. ' � � ��� ����� . � . ` ^ i
, . . ��� �� � � . r � ..
h
. � . . . _ . � �'� �.�
BoX G •
� . �, . � � . .. r ;�y��
i . Aspen,Colorado .
c •-.�-'�
�
PROOF OF PUBLICATION � �
�;� :
STATE OF COLORADO) r
• )ss. Copy of Notice ,�w� :
... __ . . . ' . . . . . . . . 4� -_'
County of Pitkin ) ���
, : «
1,Lorcu Jeakias do solemnly swenr that I am the ' �`'
PuUlisher of TI-IE ASPEl�!TIMES:that the same is a week- ,�
ly newsNaper printed,in,whole or in part,and published �y"F .
in the Count of Pitkin,Slnte of Colorado,and has� en- P'. E� �°'�.�k�Th="'�o�.p:o� ,,; ,
y 6 cawitif'„�ons�..pce d'efwnn`'�'aunYy�co.. .
enl circulaHon therein;that siid news i er has Ueen ����N'w`S�N��^�:1°��� , r �
P`P .aeo.euly�wb4a a��d ;
puUlished continuously and uninterruptedly in said �4uo»tiypnowuok�'�.�,.�rst� , �',� .
Counry oF Pitkin,(or a period of more than fifty-lwo con- �.��°rY"'���� �" , � - ' •
secutive weeks next pnor lo the first publicalion of the �,�,�r�uel,e�se,'c�e�,r.����;�"� ,�
annexed legal nolim or�dvertisement,lhat said newspa- tiwyum�mm�r.x.v�,tT,w.wiy,mv`s9s.�y,�
per has been adtnilled to the Uniled Sl�tcs mails as sec- ��'-�'— —""
ond cllss matter under the provisions of lhe Acl of March ,�
3,1879,or any amendments thereof,�nd that said news- �
paper is a a weekly newspaper duly qualified for pubfish- �
ing legal notices and advedisements with the meaning of
- Ihe►aws of lhe State of Colorado.
That the annexed legal nolice or�dvertisement was pub- ,��
Iished in the regular and entire issue of every number of •
said weekly newspaper for the period of�_consecu-
tive insertions;lnd that lhe Cust publication of said notice
� in the issue of said newspaper dated
C����4 A.D.,19�_ and lfi�t the{ast pub- �'
lication f said notice was in the issue of said newspaper
dated_c�`�l� 2� A.D..]9 4�� .
. � . . . . . . � � r .
. . . . . . . . �. . �.1,
,�
Subscribed and sworn to before me, A not�ry -
public in and for the Cou�nty of Pitkin,State of ColonAo, �
on this�,_day of dJ� A.D. 19�_. ,
6
NO�II'YrU �IC ' . ... . . �; .
' My commission expires � "��' aJ �'.
y� ; +J .f'66! �'�'(ij � �.
: 6 •y t �:
"',, ''*'�',r �� �� p { t. ;t
,� ��3 �,�b � -
� � � �,
.. ! � ,7� ` F � . . .�� � . � . +.
.� ��� ., .�6, � � ,
_�? ���.�. ,� { �
;. 'Y�p ,..�,r��' . . . .. . � � ..� . . - � � . !/JA.] . . �r
���v
�+i1'..`� � � � . ." � . . . . _ . . . � ��h'js'"i�, ..
. ,�-�„A,.`.�,_,�..�r.— � .� z..l, t
?'": . . � . . . ��� y,
� �:
/ ` `b? �
,
j �,.
�. � + r �
, ,
,
. -
. _,. , . , ' y �.:`
��
..,
,
\ : ��,; � L t
•' t ,. r: .i.?Y �
, A _ ''., -
�
` y '
il
� ` '
�1,4 � ,
.' '. . '.. .'� . ', .' . .., ' - ,
_ �.�.'�"r .. . .
� �,� ... - . . � . ,
�a�
:,.�-
..
�
�.�•�_ •
__ , ,
_._ . _ _..._.__ _�_ _ _.__� -----����,�,:,
• �. 'r��'
� TtM�� :��:::.:
Tt��
�sP �
l�.:r
' Box E '��.
– Aspen,Colorado �'r, '�
_ 'Z.
. _ . . - - � �. � � . ��-. �
PROOF OF PUBLICATION �` ',;
�.,' ��
STATE OF COLORADO) �
)ss. Copy of Notice °
- �, ,;
— . __ ^c-
;,��� i
Coutity of Pitkin � ) � '�,�;
,..;• ,.: .
I,Lorett Jenkins do solemnly swear thnt I am lhe �`' ..
Publisher of THE ASPEN 7'IMES:that the same is a week- `°w '
ly newspaper prtnted,in,whole or in part,and published t;�
in the County of P3tkin,State of Colorado,and has a gen- ,��,-�,o.;�,� s *�.�-w y�,c•, r-,
� eral circulation therein;that said newspaper has been t��,��¢cw,Rev�w�3 '4",
published contfnuously and uninterruptedly in said �,�g�y��,q,y�k'�,F; aj;.
County of Pitkin,for a period oE more Uian fi[ty-two con- �..0 n�uaa_aeNV�`��'�?%a.:
secutive weeks next prlor to the first publicalion of lhe �-�b�o�iad�i°OOc,ai`S
annexed legal notice or advertisemenh,lhat said newspa- �.o�:sas�e w+a,s�::�i.�.w��.w.�.� �.
. . �PP�ntbs wbmllted 6Y.��°�d�ll ud'I ,��
per has been admitted to the United States mails as seo- +o..wimamaor��.n.�ecs�y�:wc-
ond class mat[er under[he rovisions of the Act of March "��"'1Oi�o.aI�O"'�"�'tli°OO'a`�"
. P obune.i!��mu.w uK�.Nuuoe.m=:
3,1879,or any amendments thereof,and thal said news- �asamw•ro�•v���+.�w�e-
� a er is a a weekl news a er dul ualified(or ublish- '""�"1P'�"�°�`�'°��°tlpi�°'
P P Y P P Y 9 P pra u�.:8uemuw ur rcaauww:tiwwmiln+�
in le ai notices and advertlsements with the meanin of �+en��'°"��'°•.�°'oiX1d''
8 S g �.'�w�.n»wovmrr�-.
the laws of the State of Colorado. .e aic..�a�na.aw.�ca+w�mxES.
No 951nSWMn�B.ZC.2Y�oE]OMTwmiYp• .
� .II Sae4:,RriR&Wert al fhnHh PJL Por lur.. . � �.3, .
That the annexed le al nolice or udvertisement was lIV- ;Her����°O�°otic[Rkk N�{itl�(thd t
` ' lished in the regula gand entire issue of every number of a.m���'���
said weekly newspaper for the period of�_consecu- r a;' `�°ehi1c�a.'�°'.°W`'
ao.rd a c.oJov�m��„
_ = dve insertions;and that the Grst publication ot said notice •��+�p1°'"'�'"'�'0°"'�'�?"`"-';
was in the issue of said newspaper dated
�A.D.,19�_ �nd lhal the last pub- '
licatio of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper �
, dated �m`'�A.D.,19,�. `
` .
`�. •
_ :,:
_ �!
Subscribed and sworn lo be(ore me, � notary �
public in and for the County of Pitkin,State oE Colondo,
on this �v- O day of A.D.,19��_. � ;
. „
. . � . _ .. . . . - �. � 'r.' ,��'.
Notary Public ' j
' My commission expires �— �
�:
� .
ti119 0� �,
'� " �j} �'%
O �a� �-. �
� ����.� . .rr � ti ' �� � . . - . � . � � . � . � . . �;
� �.�vt c. l�
.. oM `r �, Y 1,
� �o• � �
n�'•' ,
� � � . �:• ; t � �
. oo� � ; ,I
r. - !�� �. . r1dM� i L
y�
.A.W�I!.. - ' " � � r .
�yl
�'� ';�
.
! r. �, ♦.
�.: ..::' � . . - . "
. .,, ... ..:� . . ..� ._ �, . �-,'.
«
� �
f `' � �`
. , i .,._ .. . ; ;:.. � ' - .� .
f y 1
'� sr .�' .
:'�` � - . . ��, �. . .
<
, .. . .:� , .; .. .i.... .. . . - .
, .
�.. .. _. ,.,`. . �. . +�__�.
. . — y' � .it(-, . . . . ^ • � . �
. . . . .... . . .
.: . . � ._.-.
'� �. : . . .. � .
. �; . . ..... � .. ' .
� i���. . - . . � ' . . . . . ' � . - . - , •
�i�'•
„z;:: -. • � ^
a m._, y�
� �h. . �:.T� �a���ty+ k��`�'{�'{��,::'.:J� °�e�-�i.� - � ” �1II� _� _.�_ 1���� . •,�„ .�r�' ` �,,
�,�
�� •�i
� ..- -���. ��� �� � . . . . . . .. g ��_'' i:.. .
� P� �tM�s
�R: :: .
BoX E ,a��t�;.�
' Aspen,Colarado 4'�'' � a,,
�,�
. PROOF OF PUBLICATION 'Y s '
-�` i
� f�;".i :
_ STATE OF COLORADO) ..
-- )ss. Copy of Notice �� _±^r '
� � - - . - . � ��.r'�' •..
County of Pitkin ) -f�� .
=t
I,Loren Jerrkius do solemnly swenr that I am the ";,�,,. �
Publisher oFTHE ASPEN TIMES:that the same is a week-
ly newspaper printed,in,whole or in part,and published � yc;:?`9 .
in the County of Pitkin,Sla[e of Colorado,and has a gen- � f.. :� ;
eral circulalion therein;that said newsp�per has been �+��"��w'�
puUlished continuously and uninterruptedly in said °+�-�E"a'E�T�"�TM•S�H�b��s
Couory,,Comminlonm W Pltltln;Ca�ory�CoF. �L1�
County of Pitkin,[ora period of more than fi[ty-lwo con- �.ac.i�.qawu�u,�a,h;,,�aa,sisss� r.'
secutive weeks next prior to the firsl publication of the y���"�"�;�1tdtA4 `
annexed legal notice or adverlisemenh lhat said newspa- "a+��w�a����-i+:�+a n�.'= i ;i_�
,nd a�.as�mowb�
per has been nctmilted to lhe United Slates mails as sec- �co�reryPCrq•z�o,.,a.i,,�°.,�s�"P�� �
ond class matter under the rovisions oE the Acl of March r NO"°�"°�55i°dN"b°°°�w x�r�,� e
P .�co'nus z�Nud�a.cao..m n.w�a,
3,1879,or any amendmenls themof,and lhal s�id news- i s��n 1,.,„,: r
� .�s .�?,eanene;mn.oewac_oums � � .f•
paper is a a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publisit- �p„b�p,��,�;��,,.��,;y.iy���
mg leg�!notices and advertisements wilh Ihe meaning of j
the laws of the State of Colondo.
i �'s�
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was pub- � °�.`
�
lished in the regular and entire issue of evgey number of j ,
_ { said weekly newspaper for the period of 1 rnnsecu- ; �
� tive insertions;and that the[irst puUlicalion of said nolice f
wBi in the issue of said newspaper da[ed �
d Z A.D.,19�_ �nd that the last pub- � '� �y-
lication�id notice was in the issue of said newsNaper
dated J `� A.D.,19�' �. �i
:�,,
;i
i,
SubscriUed and sworn to before me, a notary �'
public in and for the Cou�of Pitkin,State of Colorado,
' on this�j_day of �1J� .D.,19�_. • .
. ' .
- Notary Public ajG� -
My commission expires —g�� !/j °�.
� s66�6 y
r
,
_ 'y' .p�qJ ���/� U ���� �� sr;'r
� �y� _C�� . . . � . . . . A� . � � ..�t
� �• LD { . . . . . . . J �. , r1�,.. 1 -
H
� .�� � t
�,•.,, 5
i �
. � �JD � . . � � � � . . ' � � . �. � �� � t� �'.�.t�
. � . . � 1 tyVs,:��i
� . •�'' �`'�=
y`, .xj. y,s o:�
.. - � - - N��°�{j..a`�
'�i.. ': ,� , y�'i`y..��
. . 7 >� + ( 1'� ��:.` � .
` '1 � f • �._..` •,�!�
. f �} � 9' �'t f J'.
� + ,.
�.' `�
- r , �...
i.�i
' �� r .— -- k: - _ r � .
- _ -
�C. _
.��� . . . .. . � -.. �
.'�. . -. . . . . .
�
, • « .
,<,.:: , ,
� �_ - Y�y�J1 .. . Y ki':
, �� �... �.f" ..
� �.,�
:y-
��
� �:: :��
� � ����� � -'-.:: '
� � �� �
�
� .,�
;_ ,, :.
. f3ox E i.�,;��
� Aspen,Colorado �.`, �
> [ � z'.,
�.
��
PROOF OF PUBLICATION ;,:
F..,_. . �
- STATE OF COLORADO) ``y =
_ )ss. Copy of Notice
-- '�,
County of Pitkin ) � . �^�, .
I, Lore��Jei�ki�+s do solemnly swear that I am the
Publisher of THE ASPEN T[MES:that the same is a week- ��! '
� ly newspaPer printed,in,whole or in part,and published �����x���,�,, � ,�
� in the County of Pitkin,State of Colorado,and has a gen- ���c�rn.�m eo:.a oi,� �$��¢ !
, eral circulation therein;that said newspaper has been ��c�aw:�.wruuoco�wey ca-, ���,,,�d '„:'�
ublished continuousi and wiinterru tedl in said �"E°L°�"�'A"�"���='3�3 d'�a�, �yy/ k
p Y P Y ,ev�'e�y�w�eweu�n�..roFw�a+n., n. �_
Counfy of Pitkin,for a period of more than fi(ty-lwo con- �a�p��g�6mia�loo[k7nd Ptic? y�•- �
secutive weeks next prior to the first puUlication of the ��P X�u,�*u,�cro.n�,�.s�nawrx�.: •
annexed le al notice or advertisemenh,thal said news a- `"'�'��ad �°""`'`°TMk�'^"�`�
S P 5n,colondo"�AUUCe ,, `r.yx„��.�,5" '`
per has Ueen admilled lo the United Statcs mails as sec- �iy��,�����n���`;� `�
ond class matter under the provisions of the Act of March �. _..... __.. �
_ r''1�^?879,or'any amendments thereof,and that said news-
paper�S a a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publish-
ing legal notices anc�advertisements with the meaning of
t the laws,o[the State of Coloi�aAo.
�
. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was pub- •
lished in the regular anA entire issue of every number of
said weeklp newspaper[or the period of�_consecu- •
tive insertions;and that the first puWiwlion of said notice
w�,s in the issue of said newspaper dated
���A.D.,19�5 and lhat the last pub-
licatian of said notice was in the issue of said newsyaper
dated�_A.D.,19�. ,
�• ' .
\� c .
;
Subscribed and sworn to be(ore me, a notary
public in and for the Cou��of Pitkin,State of Colorado,
' on this�_day of � A.D.,19 g_. ,
:
;;,
. . . . .. :�_� r t i
Notary Public ..
My commission expires�-��
< A_ , �
JG , ,
,` y, �n o ro. . S'66� A�y �:
;,,,� t" :O 6 ' -
. . . `.
� N
�� :° c. �� ���� °��� ' �i
:� ovs� y, �� �/ ,'�
'a ��`,';� ; � � i��
�,... , . _ ,
'.. . .::.�
�
,��: .. il �.;r . � �� : . . . . � �i
. . � ---- ;'v ,�'"'�.',�� �, �,,� %kFi t
., a ;..
#j
: . � � .��,.�
/ �t /
4.. :
� H�
� ` :1 *� �s `
[ ) � � t
` � � �7
y ''� �,
� � .;A,tr � .
\ i. - r
�
- _�_ _ .( / '. . _
`4`1lR , .
� •
,f - .
i w.E