HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.min.reg.08091995 ��°.�. ... . � . �
. , - ,,.,,
.«;;�
. t;, �
.
:;?;.
{��::
, PT1T�N COUNTY(!OMIVIISSIONERS r'�.'�t;
,,.
RE('ULAR MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY.AUGUST 9. 1995 ``•
(Jim True and Bob Child not present)
;'�a
• 3:00 SPECIAL MEEI'ING-F,��CUTTVE SESSION-CME Litigation,Personnel '� ,.+ .
ADJOURN E,XLCUITVE SF�SION �•� �
- 3:30 PM RECiJLAR MEETING Irocation: Plaza One Conference Room
; CONSENT AGENDA r
� Isbill En�neering Hwy 82 Project Conuact,Scott Smith
j Computer Network Conduit Contract, Temple Glassier �.4?
� Denver&Rio Grande Ra7road Purchase Consultant Contract,Tom Newland f`y"�-
� Resolution Approving Use Tax Expenditure for Demer & Rio Grande Railroad ��- •
Purchase Consultant Contract,Tom Newland �r.;�
� Go Colorado Grant Contract,Tom Newland ±
1995-96 City/County Environmental Health Contracts,Tom Dunlop
� ' Letter to Colorado DepL of Health Opposing Reduction in Standards for Small `
Municipal Waste Incinerators, I.ee Cassin -
� ADMINIS'1'RATNE ACTIONS
1. lst Reading & Set for Public Hearing August 23rd, Ordinance Amending Hunter
Longhouse Lease Between Pitkin County and the Housing Office,Debbie Quinn
2. lst Reading and Set for Public Hearing August 23, Resolution Submitting to the
- � Electorate for November 7, 1995 Election the Following Ballot Questions:
� � Home Rule Chazter Amendments (no packet material) "
Translator District Property Tax
� ' - Wildlife and Recreation Support Fund,Tom Newland (no packet material)
t . - Authorization to Issue General Obligation Backed Airport Revenue Bonds and �
� Contingent Authorization for a Tax Increase
_ + 3. soludon Approving Use of CasUe Creek Road Right-of-Way for USFS Parking Lot,
� Tom Newland :
4. Transfer of Ownership Liquor License Aspen Skiing Company(Sundeck),Angela Rishel
5. .,_Burnt Mountain Water Settlement Agreement, First Amendment, Debbie Quinn
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. Znd Reading, Pitkin County Clean Indoor Air Act (Smoldng Policy) Resolution, Tom
� -—-_ � Dunlop
� 7. 2nd Reading, Ordinance to Suspend Auto Emissions Program,Lee Cassin
j 5:00 PM Location: District Courtroom
' PUBLIC COMMENT, COMNIISSIONER OOMIVVIEENTS
, ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO AGENDA, PROCLAMATIONS
IJ\ND USE PUBLIC HEARINGS ,
� 1. Andlinger Caretaker Dwelling Unit,Suzanne Wolff(tabled 7/26)
� 2. Regan Caretaker Dwelling Unit, Suzanne Wolff
� 3. Casey Fxtension of Vested Rights, Ellen Sassano
4. Tisch Extension of Vested Rights,Tim Malloy
5. Aspen School District Code Amendments, Mary Lacirner
6. Murray Lot Separation, 1041 Hazard Review&Scenic Overlay,Francis Krizmanich �=':
7. Avalanche Ranch Fxtension of Vested Rights, Rick Magill j '
8. McDade L.ot Split, 2nd Reading, Rick Magill ;�
- �� .
�;�
, . f �..._., - , .
.,:. a r :,. _ ; • _ .. ,. . -
:, .
,.. ,
� -• . , . •, t., ..a•,� . .:,, , ,,..�, ,..,. : ,, „. ;:,. �• ,t,� :.r•.
._�,.. ,._..., ..t
. ... . . . . . � . - . . . . ` . . . . . � �, t �:���.
^ . . . . � . . � � � � . -
" � . ' � . � _ . . . � t . �
• b __ �
„ . .
_ _._ .._ . _, • !
�?� . .
� '��±'T ' ' � � � . , .
Y��
.�arrrr ---�_ ._ _._._._ .- ._.. .___..
j: �
�
�.wt^ :.,�.. :�`�L'� .L ��� :,)±.... � .rr. .:.�,,. . . � . . .��
� „.,.. , . 'v:da'.y�`+F.:Mn"�;U�,.tih'${C'E�!]��Aitiy.a£�.�.kt��'t4�7tfiit,�'1('r�`i{�a� "� i�.,
}�,t�.
�
;�;.
. 'k:;:��;�
�,,.,..
! AS LEBSOR AND THE ASPSN/PITRIN COUNTY HOUSIN(3 AQTHORITY AS LE868E ����: �
� RSLATIN(i TO THB BIINTER LONGHOIIBE $OIISING PROJECT - MOTION TO "xt' '�
! A�.PItOVS AND SET 80R SECOND READINC3 ON AIIGIIST 23 1995 ^�'��:�'�
!' `-.r'.•,ti..y
Tuite moved approval o! lirst reading of tDe Ordinaace aad set for •>%
) aeaond reading and publia hearing on Auqust 23, 1995. Witb a ���,��;�
� aecond by 8thridge, the motion passed unanimously. � �;;�
1. r
� RESOLIITION SUHMITTIN(i TO THS BLECTORATE AT AN $LECTION TO B8 HELD �
O!i NOVSMBEA 7 1995 SE�►EItAT+ LOCAL GOVBRNMENT MATT8R8 ARIBING IINDER ,`�'�v�'. !
! ��K�t;,r,ii.
._- � �8C4'ION 20 OF ARTICL S OF TH8 STATS CONBTITUTION MOTION TO APPROVE ,
FIRBT READIN(; AND SET FOA PIIBLIC H£ARZNfi ON AIIl3II8T 23. 1995
`„ti-;
- Home Rule Charter Amendmeata •
�'t..; ''
� - Tranalator Diatrict Property Tax f ��.w
r�al .
i - Wiidlife and Recreatioa Support Fund j�; '�
I t
j - Authorizatioa to Issue General Obligation Backed Airport (' '�
• Revenue boads and Continqent Authorisation for a Taa ��y�� ,
Increase . I%
��
Tuite moved approval of first readinq and aet for aecond readiaq
on Auqust 23, 2995 at 3:30 p.m. With a second by Sthridqe, the �
_ motioa pasaed unanimously.
� 'j�RliAT.TITTAN ar.rnmr�tr_ vnQ mxF usF ox A PoRTIUN OF THS CABTLE CREER
ROAD BIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A PARRING LOT FOR ACCBBS TO FEDERAL I,ANDB -
MOTION TO APPROVE � ','�
�;�;�".
Tuite moved approval of the Reaolution. With a seoond by Ethridge, ,
I the notion passed unnnimously. `-.
APPLICATION FOR A LIOIIOR LICENSS TRl1NSFER OF OWNERSHIP_FOA THS
BUNDECIC RESTAIIRANT FROl�t ASPEN 8RI COMPANY LIMITBD PARTNERSHIP TO �± �`+'
ASPEN SRI COMPANY LIABILITY COMPANY - MOTION TO`APPRO{1B
i .
Hthridqa moved approval of the tranafer of ownerahip liceasa. With
,� a aecond bp Tuite, the motion passed unaaimouslp. �
RESOLD'IION AIITHORIZING THE CSAIRMAN TO ERECIITS FIRST AMENDMENT TO
II�TER BETTLSMENT AGREEMENT B&TWEBN PITRIN COIINTY. T$E TOWN OF
SNOWMA88 VILLA(iE THE ASPEN 8&IING COMPANY. SNOWMABS CLIIB '�
6 ASSOCIATES`TliE SNOWMA88 LAND COMPANY AND THE BNOSQMA88 NATSR AND ,
' ! SA2iITATIOTi DISTRICT - MOTION TO APPROYE u ' •
i �
� $thri3ge moved approval of the Resolution. With a aecond by Tuite,
� the motion passed uaanimously. '��
� y:�,
,ADMINISTRATIVE PQBLIC HEARING_8: ���
� � ' . `-
HOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONSRS 2 AIIGIIBT 9� 1995 � '
;;') - r f
G�,,� -
,:�
e`
! ----- --- 1
._ __J..._�r.._w..._..._....._ .—....�: _i ._��:. _. .�,.,, ,,.,. ...�.�_ I
� / . - - � . . � ... . .: .�.... _ .._.. �,... � i N�� •;..
. . : ' . . . . -. . _ . ' . ' .
. ' - ' . . . �1' Y
" . .. ` ' . �: . '. . _. :.1-.. .
. .. . . �7 � . . .. .. -' . _
.` 1, . � �. . " � ' - � � � � � .
. . . . � . . . � .
� . . � � . . . � . . � � '
•.�}�'T . � ..
. . ��:� �
:>:.:-�, , ,
_ . _..__ ..... . ._..,._.�.:___._�_.,,...<,.
y k's��1;�%',
. .`t-,,,,,�
' ,�.
� _ ;���. .s�j
`��; �.
ORDINANCB ENACTING A N8W ARTICLE V TITLB 111/AIR POLLIITION '`-.'.
RBGIILATIONB OF THS PITRIN COIINTY CODB TO HS 1CNOWN AB ��THE PITICIN j _�-�
COIINTY CLEAN INDOOR AIR ACT��. TO CONTROL AND LIMIT THS BMO1CINa OF �, ,��'
TOBACCO OR ANY OTHER WEED OR PLANT IN INDOOR PDBLIC PLACES AND
PLAC&8 OF EMPLO]tl�NT AS 8ET FORTH THEREIN: PR88CRIBING P&NALTIEB (:' :='
1\tTD REMEDIEB FOR THS VIOLATION THEREOF - MOTION TO TAHLB PENDING � L'�
A WORR 8E88ION - Tom Dunlop proceeded with his presentation �.°� ✓
i regardinq this matter and the proposed changes as outlined in his ;� `
� memorandum to the Board dated August 9, 1995. A copy of this `_ �
":; memorandum is attached hereto and made a part of this record as
r, 8S828IT ��g��_ ,.�-
� [r .'
:? Ireland moved to amead 5-6.1 to include laaquage vhich states "Any ,`+,:
� private or membera only club/orqanization that serves alcohol must ` '
possesa a state of Coiorado Liquor Liaense to ciaim this �.'
'� eaemption��. With a second by Tuite, the motion passed unanimouely. 1�
t
Sthridqe proposed an amendmeat to allow smokinq in bar areas that �
are physically separated and separately veatilatad and only in !
those circunstances. Tuite aeconded the motion. ( .
�. .
]►fter a diacussioa Bthridqe withdrew hia motion aad direated ataff
" to sahedule a work session to aome up with a definition of what
separate means. }
'a
Ireland opened the hearing to public comment. �
� There was one member of the public who spoke in opposition to the !
� proposed legislation. She said she is a smoker and has a couple k
of restaurants that she frequently dines at who allow smoking. She
� would like the decision to be made by the individual restaurant �
� owners.
• � There being no further comment, Ireland closed the public hearing
and brought the matter back to the Board for action.
Ethridqe moveQ to table this matter and continue the public hearinq
to 1lugust 23, 1995, peadinq a Mork sesaion to be held oa Auquat 15, � ,
1995. lfith a second by Tuite, the motioa passed unanimously. ;, '�
a Staff was directed to notify the Redstone people with the date and ` .
� , time of the work session. j
R880LOTIOH ESTENDING THE SIISPBNSION OF THE AIITOMOBILE INSPECTION
PROfiRAM FOR GASOLINS-POWSRED VEHICLES REGISTERSD IN PITRIN CODNTY
• , MOTION TO E%TSND TO SEPTEMBER 15 1995 - Lee Cassin, representing •
' the Environmental Health Department, said this is second reading •
of an ordinance to suspend the emissions inspection program to
September 15, 1995 to give the full Board a chance to discuss it. '
At the work session yesterday the Board talked about the f1�
possibility of continuing the program through the winter, with the (�.
� condition that the Clean Air Board monitor the performance of the ;� �
i-,
�•}
HOARD OB COIINTY COMMI8820NER8 3 AQGIIST 9, 1995 �.. � '
;-. ' � i,
�. �
��
__ _-_.-.-...�.:� ��:...� ,� . .,.:,....W:. .�. ....,,...,.. _........ .�
..._.......� u_..,_ , _..�.. �...__ _. .- - " S�.
/.. ' ' . .. � � . � . • � � ,� 5�.�
. . . .. � . �. - t.,, �
. � . . . . � . . '��ri. .'�:
� . . � . ' .. , � .\
-� _ . . � . �� . . �' . ... ��!��,
. . . . .. - . . � . . . �.i . . '
. . . . . . , . � • . ..;: . . .
� ..� . . � . . . . . . . / , . . . . '
r
-- �—' .t- ,—. . - .. �. __ � � . . . - . . . � � ' •
� T��"'. . _ . . �
�
��st.�r • . - . . .
� `
��'
_ .
.: . _. , �
�...%.:; , ,
.:,� � -
. _ _ ____ . __ - -- —_,,,......:
. ;��i��j:�.��
� �
t.
��.',4
� , :�;�iN+,�t I
test stations and that the Environmental Health Department and the '�.:�.
Clerk's Office jointly develop a random survey to gauge customer ;_,.��
comments. She said staff will be prepared to come back on �. ,� '
September 15 with the survey and answers to some of the questions. ;:;�
-? t� _:i,.
,;� Ireland clarified that he wants everyone to get a survey card, � ,;.,'
,„ rather than a random survey.
1 � ;,.
�;, Ireland opened the hearing to public comment. There being no °�= '
comment, he closed the public hearing and brought the matter back �"i7` �"
,
to the Board for action. - �-�
��. .,.
_ _. _ .:r...
��,
' Tuite moved approval of the Resolution eatenQiaq suspenaion o! the '.�.,;.:�
emissioas proqraa� to September 15, 1995. With a seaond by `-''-'• '
- Sthridqe, the motion passed unanimously.
Ireland recessed the meeting at 3:4o p.m. to reconvene at 5:00 p.m. �
in District Court Room. � :
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ireland reconvened the meeting at 5:10 � '
to hear public comment and consideration of Public Hearings and �
Actions.
CO2II�II88ION MEMBSRB PREBENT: Mick Ireland, Wayne Ethridge, and
Bill Tuite '
i
s
COl4IISBION MEMBERB ABBENT: Bob Child and Jim True s
7
1
Ireland introduced Suzanne Konchan as the new County Manager. ;
PIIBLIC COMMEN'�: None E�
F•'
ADDITIONS/DSLETIONS TO AGENDA: None ;
d
COMMISSIONER COMMENTB. ?
- Ethridge noted that he has watched Suzanne Konchan's performance !
as planning director over the last several years, and has never
been more impressed with a planning director, and is lookinq �i
- , forward to working with her in the capacity of County Manager. j
._..�90___ 1 .
�: ' Ireland noted that the Ducky Derby fund raising event will be held
this coming Saturday. Also, he thanked the people involved with !
the Hard Rock Cafe fund raising event. He said this is a great ;
event and would like to thank them for putting it on every year. :
, I .
� He said he would like to urge the Board to think about closing �' "
� Maroon Creek Road in the future for that event. It was agreed that ;
I this matter would be scheduled for a work session for discussion I;
RESOLIITION GRANTIN6 APPROVAL TO THE ANDLINGER CARETARER DWELLIN(i
i IINiT - MOTZON TO APPROVS - - Suzanne Wolff, staff planner, �; y��
.. �� �•�:.:i
BOARD OF COIINTY COMMI88IONERB 4 AIIGIIBT 9, 1995 �" �
, -_
- �`.
's''
. . I---,.------�.�.•�,.:,:s.u.�.... ...�..,�:>.....: .��;..,.,,r � .�.�.�..... .. ..._._. .--.�_.. _._�.,...__,_.r.�-.�.x.�.- .. . . .z.;.:<� _��t��.:-, �y;� ��"� .
. i�.' . . , . _ � . .� ., . - �_� ���:�
. � .. � - . � �. . . . . � � ' . . �� �� i
' �
. � . `, . - . . �. . . . . I,�,
' �:. ':, , `' :, _ .. ;.
� ' . � . . . � � � . . . - � ....�..�;- � ..
� � . � . . . . � . � - = . . . _ � . -.
\ ,' . . .. � . , .. . . . . .' , . ' . , . . . . . _. � - ..
. . .. �.. . . �,,_ ... , r .: .. . . . .. . . . . ' . . ,
�; � . � � . � . � � � . . .. . � � . � ' .
,�+�� . - ;a _.:
;�i
. �:��'�.. ._;��- ..,�,�,�..,. . . . • , . "
_ ,`'"`'�:Y``
f �'
i .. '._
�;` •i'
introduced this item as an application, submitted by Gerhard � :%.�'
Andlinger, to request approval of an approximately 559 square foot � _�
I caretaker dwelling unit within a new residence. Staff is �-. .
recommending approval subject to the conditions in the resolution. �•,'��
r ,..
Ethridqe asked the applicant what is underneath the caretaker unit? t,•
' ��'�,'�
i A representative of the applicant responded that there is a qarage. y.,•, - <.
� Ethridge said he is reluctant to grant a caretaker unit which ''"�" 'r
- " appears to him to be new square foo tage in a home t ha t is 1 8,0 0 0 �
� square feet. Particularly since there is no quarantee at all that �^r� '
this caretaker unit is going to be used for a traditional employee. :- '.-
w� :
The representative noted that plans have already been approved for
a storage space. That county staff advised them to present the
plans with a.storage space area, and then come in for approval of �s�
a caretaker unit. Also, knowing the owner, he does not think he 4
would have any reason to use it any other way. "�
Ireland opened the hearing to public comment. There being no �. S,
comment, he closed the public hearing and brought the matter back
to the Board for action.
Tuite moved approval xith conditioas as outlined in the resolution. 43
- With a second by ireland, the motion passed vith two yea votes bp
Tuite and Ireland aad one nay vote by Sthridqe, �
k'
Ethridge reguested that the Board schedule a work session to ;
discuss separated exemptions. It was agreed this matter would be '
scheduled for a work session the first week in September. ,�
RESOLIITION GRANTING APPROVAL TO THE REGAN CARETAlCER DWSLLING IINIT - �,
liOTION TO TABLE SEPTEMBER 13. 1995 - Suzanne Wolff, staff planner, '
introduced this item as an application, submitted by Mark and #
- Carolyn Regan, to request approval of a one-bedroom caretaker '
dwelling unit of approximately 399 square feet of net livable floor �
area in the basement of a single family residence. i -
� Wolff noted an outstanding issue, that being that the Environmental �
� -��-- Health Department stated that an adequate quantity of water has i
been demonstrated. However, it has been determined that there are
coliform bacteria in the water. Therefore, prior to issuance of
a Certificate of occupancy, the applicant must provide proof of
, . good quality water. �
I Ethridge said he would like to see referral comments from the , �
emergency management coordinator with regard to the road prior to .
i approval of the application. r
j It was agreed that this matter be tabled pending staff pulling the
� file from a previous 1041 administrative review to see if there � . _.
I BOARD OF COIINTY COM2SIBSIONERB 5 AIIGUST 9� 1995 + -�;`�
� � i
�'.
i
�
.,.- ---....�_.,..,:.�_.� .�__�_.__.....,�...__.__r.__._._..,._ .�..�... _...�..,_ _....:,_.. ...�_.,..:_: � ...:��,�.s --.'^ �,
.. '�`�
i �x> n'
. � . � . . - . � 9 - . r... .
. . —_ . . .� • ' �. � . i - � , �. '�', i
.. . . � <.. -..
' . . . . .. . �: . . . � • - . �.
`' i . . . . . . I '�"j;•i � . . � . . . � ' . .
. . ..__ �. . -_r .� "_ ._.I . . � . • . � . � � .
. �� � . � . . . . . . . . � � . � •
r{� ��iF
�l..n. . • � . � . � ; . ' .
� y',?
.f. , '
�� °
, y���,', _ � /iN..i. ��a...,. '- .. t�n x... � ' � ' ' ..f f L{`'...»�R�:..+5......�n+AieJanY9nxwM1.w bw.+r..rr_�.r • .
��;,f r��f�r 4
,3 `-u
v'�.
'M
� �pi.r��{rl�i
are any referral comments from the emergency management � `
coordinator. ;�iy..�. '
!: - �
RESOLIITION GRANTING 8%TENBION OF VESTSD REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR
''^�•`..��'�
T8S CABEY 1041 SAZARD APPROVAL - MOTZODT TO TABLE TO BEPTSMBSR 15 `�y���'„;;'r
199 - Ellen Sassano, staff planner, introduced this item as an � �
application, submitted by Douglas Casey Trust, to request an +<-� ��
extension of vestin for a eriod of three ears. She �� ' " s'�
' g p y proceeded , s
; with her presentation as outlined in her memorandum to the Board � !
.. �... _r:;.'� �
1 dated August 9, 1995. A copy of her memorandum is attached hereto ;y;�;',��:. �
�' and made a part of this record as ERHIBIT "C��.
x�,�. •.
A discussioa ensued with regard to the road issue. 'k' �:` '
�� Sassano submitted a letter from the homeowners association with
� regard to this issue. A copy of this letter is attached hereto and ��`` .
� made a part of this record as S%HZBIT ��D��. ?; `
;
� Suzanne Konchan Count Mana er said in ''`41
, y g , past discussions at the ,
Board level regardinq 1o41's up in Shield-O, etaff was workinq
towards looking at a road improvement district options that the '''�
,.;;.
County might be able to impose or other alternatives to getting the ,rp
work done. She thinks before proceeding tonight with a plan that '
possibly puts the road construction at the responsibility of the ,,;�.}
County, she would like some time to talk with public works and some
' of the planners and maybe present some alternatives to the Board.
Ireland opened the hearing to public comment. �
Glenn Horn, representing the applicant, said he has a concern with :.;.
the letter from the homeowners association. He thinks there needs ''�
to be some kind of estimate made of what the standard is that `�`,'
• people are aspirinq to on the road so that the equitable share can
be determined.
� After further discussion it was agreed that this matter should be p,
tabled pending the County Manager working with staff and the f
, homeowners association to try to come up with a solution to fhe
road issue. '
��
,i Ethridqe moved to table the matter and continue the public hearing ;
to September 13, 1995. With a aeaond by Tuite, the motion passed ;,
j unaaimously.
� 'i
Staff was directed to schedule a work session to discuss this issue
� prior to the meeting of September 13th. Also, to notify all f� .
landowners of this meeting. -
CONTINOATION OF REGAN APPLICATION
Ireland opened the public hearing on this matter.
�. x'.
-, BOARD OF COONTY COMMI88IONERB 6 AIIGUBT 9� 1995 ��-�
(
i ,;; .
s:
,.� .
:;�; .
� C.�: _
. �.-�_.�...�..,.._.u�. . . • .�.�.(,.v..-....._ .,,i_..�.4�... ..,.... .... _ w�..c.n.. .el+.te . �..+....t � . �r ..
. . . . . � . �•., .•1
. . . . . . �' . . . . . . . . 7:�-.
- -' � i � � - . ' . . .. ��:, , �
-. . � . . � . ! .
. . .. . . . 1� . . � - I•l
' . ' . . . . .�... . . . ,���; t.
: , . . ' . . - ... � � . . . . , ' . . ' .. ' .,. -
—. .. _,_ _ _ _ ._ - . . r
�: •
;���� ,
�
, '�r, .
.___ . � � � � - � -- � r �F:`,�.
k
' � fvp,
Y �. �
. �4�
u4.,��,��;
Wolff noted that the minor 1041 on the property was reviewed � !°
administratively in August of 1992. Comments at that time were �' ��
received from the Sheriff's office as well as the Colorado State `' �`;�
Forest Service. Bpth entities made recommendations and noted that I %
the road is a problem and therefore, access is a problem, because `� ,y:,
the road is sub-standard. �
s
Iraland entertained a motion to table this matter to September 13, �.
1995 to address this issue at a work session. `•S� �
'•f
', Ethridge moved to table this matter, pending a work session, and
- � continue the publia hearinq to September 13, 1995. With a second �``'��' �
by Tuite, the motion psssed unanimously. '=`i""''
•`s:`''`: ,
TIBCH E$TENBION OF V88TED RIG8T8 - MOTION TO TABLE TO SEPTEMHER !3.
y 994 - Tin Malloy, Staff Planner, introduced this item as an
i application, submitted by Steven Tisch, to request approval of an `�
extension of vested property right for a period of three years. He `.,.�
� proceeded with his presentation regarding this case as outlined in
� his memorandum to the Board dated August 9, 1995. .
!;"3.''
j Malloy urged the Soard to approve staff�s recommendation and table ��Y,
l this item pending staff visiting the site with Mike Claffey, with
ithe Army Corps of Engineers, to conduct a wetlands delineation on .��
I this property. He said he has made arrangements to meet Mr.
Claffey on site tomorrow morning to get his opinion as to whether
- or not a wetland delineation is necessary. `
�
� Brooke Peterson, representinq the applicant, said that when they
received their approval in 1992, the first condition of approval •`
was, and they accepted, was that no disturbance may occur in the �'��
wetland or riparian area. He does not have a problem agreeing to
that condition that is already present on the property. He
. requested that the Soard grant the extension subject to the
delineation of the wetlands and agreement that they won't build in
the wetlands.
�e.
Ethridge noted that the Board needs to know where the wetlattds are.
.; � Ireland commented that he thinks this could be delegated to staff
`q � and Mr. Claffey. That Board could approve this subject to a
-' -`-; revised building envelope that meets the approval of Mr. Claffey
I and staff.
� Tuite clarified that staff is recommending that this be tabled.
Sthridqe moved to table the matter and coatinue the public hearinq • ' 1 �
to September 13, 1995 pendinq ataff viaitinq the aite vith lSr.
� Claffey to review the wetlands isaue. With a second by Tuite, the
� motion passad uaanimouely. '
r�:
' Peterson said that the application to extend the vested rights was �
�f`
�,,: -
. BOAI2D OF CODNTY COMMISSIODTERS 7 AIIGIIST 9� 1995 `;'7� �r`.''
' ;} 1
� Ji. ,
y�.
. . � . i .i� . .
i
i
- '_.—�... u�...s_. •--t�„'::s.�•.tz.,a..w:::y: _+�:;.�..1;... - - ..r.ct.�..--.: �'. .
-, .. ..._. ;;Y,.� I
. " . . . .. � ., �-� r,{�,L
i . . .. ' . _ ' .. .. . k` ,y � Yy�1 1 '
. � � - � � ' ' '� � F ti��:
� . . . � . - . . • +,.��..�
� . . . . . . . . ' , . �� ��
. ��
.. � . . � 1,. . . . _, . .
� . � :• .. . . . .. ,i. , _ . . . . . .
. � . . . -� . . . � � � :.�. '.. . � ' .. . .
\ - � � . � . �` , . ' . . . � . .
. iF. �
�- • . . . -� " . , �
r�.�^t .. . . . . .
���... . . , .
�
;t;;c.�.: •
. .-*tio-.�. v.;t�,&,��:r7h-�.a. -� ..,.. . ... - � � ` - � -- - . . . ~
�"T ,,?Ai.{;iJ.
i �'',�': /, ,,4t,�
�.;
� i ����, !f1
�. �f
filed prior to the expiration date. However, in actuality the �_""��`'�
j vested rights have expired. He requested that the vested rights :' � �
be extended to September 13, 1995. � '`�
.�,
��I Tuite moved to extead the vesied rightm to Beptember 13, 1995. j•;:�•'•�
Nith a seaond by IrelanQ, the motion passed uaanimouely. '•z.�:;
�
} BECOND RBADING - ORDINANCB ADOPTING BCHOOL LAND DEDICATION :.
� BTANDARDB - UIOTION TO TAHLB TO AIIGIIST 23. 1995 - Mary Lackner, ��._;'i ;
�.._,.
� staff planner, said this matter was reviewed by the Board at first �;:>>. ,_
reading at the July 26, 1995 meeting. At that time there were �� '^
e��::-,
� several items that the directed staff to look at and report back .:r: �
at this meeting. She proceeded to review those issues as follows: � '
. � �
1. The Board has asked for a list of all pipeline cases that may
b e s u bj e c t t o t h i s l a n d d e d i c a t i o n r equ i r e m e n t s h o u l d i t b e �.
approved this evening. The following projects have not S^.
� received Detailed Submission approval and would therefore be '
� subject to these requirements: Urshe2 (4 lots), Moore (71 4�
lots), Highlands (146 lots), North Forty (74 lots), Cozy Point � i'
Lot Split, and Koutsoubos Lot Split. +
� 2. The Board requested a letter of support from this proposed (
� code amendment by the Roaring Fork Sohool District. Staff has �
included this letter in this memorandum.
3. Staff had recommended that the County wllect a 2� £
administrative fee for the collection and holding of the money
collected from this proposed land use code provision. Tom i
Oken has reviewed the proposed code provision and recommends `
a 18 County administrative fee, as this would parallel the fee �
for school capital reserve property taxes. Staff has added
_ this language in the ordinance as Section 3-1306(Ej (2j (bj.
4. The Board asked for a comparison of the proposed land !
dedication requirement proposed for the Roaring Fork School
District and what the requirement is for Eagle County. I
Essential Eagle County has divided the they type of dwelling ; .
� unit into the following three categories with the land •
'>� dedication requirement in parenthesis: �
_ _-------�
� I Single family/duplex (631 sq.ft. per unit) '
� Multi-Family (116 sq.ft. per unitj
{ Mobile Home (971 sq.ft. per unit)
The cash conversion for the land dedication requirement is �
based on a straight land value depending on the specific , '
� county area. Eagle County has adopted a land value of $10,000
� per acre in the Basalt area for the calculation of this fee. :
Therefore a sinqle family residence on a one acre parce2 would i
� i �.-.
i BOARD OF COIINTY COMMI86ION8R8 8 AIIGIIBT 9� 1995 � •^'^_!
j � i -
�
; � ; -
� �,
/� ��:: �, . , _�. ._ ._ � _.»....�_....v. _..—__ —,.,�,,.,��
. - � . . �. � � . _ . . � ' � . � 9� . ' .�1 .�,y.�
. ...� . . � . � .
- - . : .. �.. . . - �. � : � _... . . �i t
l:
� . . � . . � �� � . - � . � � � . � .t:: ''.
�� . � . .� . . . . . . . . - � . � .
�\ { . . �. � .. . . . . . . . .:i .. . - . .
� . . . . �. . . . •
. _ . .-��. ._ __ - ... . . �.[._.� . . • . � , .
��� � . . . . .. . . . � �' . . . � . •
�y�w. . . . . _ . . . � . . � . ,
r •
b � � . . � . � . '
.-p. '
:��
.'�'8",(. . _ .. . '. , . . . . � ' � i . ..�.........I..��..y.+r. «...,..�......�...�
. _ . � . .. ... .. . ...._ .. .. .. .. 'r'�F3 1,�'
• ..r t#.:
'��`� k
' �
S� �al
be required to pay $144.85. In comparison, a newly subdivided '"'"
parcel in the Basalt area of Pitkin County would most likely � :,-��
have a minimum assessed land value of $100,000. A proposed j:. �
four bedroom house would be subject to a fee of $1,138.50. i`.��':�
_ S'`.��b�:
The land dedication requirement for the Roaring Fork School -
1 District is considerably less in Eagle County due to the
j artificial land values than the land dedication requirement ' � • -'
- r
; proposed for Pitkin County. �-��•-
� ��s.:::-
� 5. Chairman Ireland has requested that the first $100,000 of land ;
v value be exempt from the proposed school district land '� ,�
� �:"TK��•'�: :
� dedication requirements. Aspen School District board member ;;w�;�
� Chuck Brandt will be addressing this issue at the meeting. "'��'• '
�
6. At lst reading the BOCC voted 4-0 to sponsor the submission `
of this request as it was submitted outside the dates for �'
privately initiated code amendments. The BOCC also determined
at ist reading that they are unable to waive the land use �
review fees for this project.
f� �
Lackner noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend „
denial of the applicant's request. The Planning Office recommends
approval of the applicant's request.
Ireland said the representatives have not addressed whether or not
there is going to be the first $100,000 as an exemption. He does
not see this in the written material. i�
Lackner said they have not addressed this with her. Staff is
recommending approval based on what staff looked at in making it
- across the board; everyone pays 33 percent of their land fee and
making it a fair payment across the board instead of exempting
certain parcels over $100,000 or less than $100,000, they feels it
� is a more fair fee, across the board if everyone pays their
proportionate share.
� '
� Chuck Brandt, representing the school district, said with regard
'� _ to the $100,000 exemption, he reviewed the statute and did not see
� ', an ability to make some distinction between different types of lots
within a subdivision. So it was his conclusion, that since
employee lots generate children, and that's the impact the school
district is trying to address, that some type of distinction might � �
cause the ardinance to be subject to a challenge. �:
� ;'
Ethridge commented that the inclusion of RE-1 School District into
this is a big concern of his because people are getting "nailed"
in property taxes down valley, and a much higher rate than Aspen.
i
John Ely 2isted the four issues that he has with this as follows: , '��
�. .�'.:
BOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSION8R8 9 AII(�IIST 9� 1995 ` =
,. , , . ,; ���:
�'.; .
. p .i
� � �--�--�-,.au;s¢.s.,.r,ro�.::scu=_..w,... - � . -�. ._._....�,..._ _ ._� ...._.,..h.,_�. ��.-s•„ ,_ __.- -----•�..,,,t F�i
/ - . . � . , . . . . . , . . ���_: y'
' . , . , . . . . . ' ' .• v:t:) �� �
y
-- . ' � . . .`, - . � _ " �IY.1
�. '.. ' '..�- . .,�. . �.� . . . � .. . ..��. . � . ... � � � -�.
• . . . ' ..-��. . .. . � . . .
.I . . . . ., ... . � .. . • , .( . . . . . . ' . _ "
�, 1 . . ': : :, .... . .... . . . . .. . . .
. . . . . . . - . . .. - ' � . � � ,
. . ' . �.: . .... . .��... . . . . ..
. . � _. , ..._ _...-.._�._. _ ....... . . ..-./".., .:._. . .
�� � . . . � . . � ,' . � . . : .. . . . . .. ' •
•� W
. �•t;:��, . . � . . . . . . . . . . . ,
' y . ,
Mx
��.,�. . :a.. _.. . _ , , ^
, . ......
. � ._.
._ . ..__..._._._. .
_ _ . ,<,..._
_ ,,.�:;:,`�.
�:�<�..
`',:
s :
, . : :},:
�;:�;^�5,4,`;s
. ,..
1. Ability to ahve housing under $i00,000 in cost exclnded ��! '
2. Abilitiy to exclude affordable housinq �"� '`•
3. Does ordinance have to be applied to whole county? r `�.'��
:' 4. Status of pipeline cases (Moore and Highlands) i:',�.�y_l
� ���_
,;M1...` .•. (.
� Bthridge moved to table thia matter to Auquet 23, 1995 pendinq � `
--- � ravier of the leqal issues by the Countp Attorney. With a second `:-• '};
b Tuite the motion y. �'�`
y , passed uaanimousl � �': :
r,_ .
� lfURRAY LOT SSPARATION CONCEPTUAL SUBMIBSION AND BCF.NIC REVIEA �`_
MOTION TO TABLB TO AIIGUST 23 1995 - Francis Krizmanich, staff
planner, introduced this item as an application, submitted by Joyce � �
K. Murray Charitable Trust, to request approval to separate two �'�
. merged lots No. 5 and 6, in the West Buttermilk Subdivision. He �
said the main issue appears to be whether the lots in question were ��1
ever legally subdivided. If the lot separation request is •
approved, conceptual submission approval is also requested. He ��a �
proceeded with the history of this property and staff's comments
as outlined in his memarandum to the Board dated August 9, 1995. �
A copy of this memorandum is attached hereto and made a part of ��
this record as EXHIBIT ��8��.
Ethridge referred to the Planning and Zoning Commission's
recommendation, which was approval of the application if the Board
approved the lot separation. That they recommend denial of this
application because the lots in question resulted from an illegal -
subdivision. He questioned how the P&Z got to this recommendation. '+;"
_ - Krizmanich responded that there was quite a bit oE discussion and
quite a bit of talk about whether they would be liable or not. He
basically asked them to make their recommendation from their heart
, . without regard to the legality of the lots because that wasn't
their call, basically, and that's how they dealt with it.
Ethridge asked for a joint meeting with the P&Z to discuss this •
�_ issue. Because once again there are P&Z members who are hesitant
� -- to make a recommendation because of legal liabilities and he thinks
� this is a serious problem.
It was agreed that a work session would be scheduled with the P&Z, �
, for next Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. to discuss this matter r
�:
Bill Sterling, Trustee for the Murray Trust and listing agent, said .
the Murrays� purchased the property from Friedl Pfeifer in the late `
1960's, three years after the plat had been recorded, without going
though the subdivisioa process with the County. He said the P&Z �`
is actually recommending approval of this despite their wafflinq
on the issue of the status of the status of the lots. He
;i
� i3'":
. BOARD OF COIINTY COPlMI88IONERS 10 AIIGIIST 9� 1995 �� �~:�?
d: c
� �;
,
� ' _' ...n�s.e�.u.:. _..�r....—w.�.< .-....'..,..�,.:... ..,... .I .. .....Y.. .a V k.J.i:a e.�A...ww+�r-.rY,rn�,n�iN..e. R+-te4.§�..ay 3 ;.��t+l
/ .
. . . . ' . . � � . . f .
. . � . .. . . ` . . , . ' � " � �''
. . . � ' _� . . . .. . - . . 1�� '�
' . . ' . . .. .. �• . . .. . ' - ' ', `_
�, � .. � . . ' . � � . . "J )•'IL ., . . . ' .
1 .. . . . . , . .
� - � � . � . � . . . � � f . . . . . . , .
. .�c _". _. . .-t.�. � . - . . - .. . . ..� .
�� . ' �.... . . .. .. � . . .... . ... . .. - •
�htT� . _ ... . .- . . . � . . . •
�
�'l'��•
.MJii. .• ..��..... Y�. . �. _. ...`_�. .. w. . i-�': .. 1t..,'��� 'c.._r...+.�.'�4'SI,+,��s1a��}'i:�.t�33`5.����.io�YGt�iJ�"? � i�Fll'.
�.w -���
;� :
introduced Maxwell Aley, Attorney foY the Murray T�ust. ;;-:!�. �
�: I�,.
Maxwell Aley noted that the first subdivisian ordinance was adopted i'
�;';:r.-
in June of 1966, and it applied to all parcels of land under five �. :.-:i,,
acres. Six months later the Owl Creek Development Corporation �� ,., ,'.'
1 prepared a survey plat of these six lots and recorded them in the -
� County records. They did then comply with the existing AF zoning, �;V.:: � r'
( which was in place at that time. Owl Creek Development conveyed .;:r::;�i. _
iLot 5 to Friedl Pfeifer in 1967 and then Friedl required lot 6 from �:<":�
� a person named John Griffiths in 1971. By separate deeds from each �;;;:�''.•
� lot, Friedl conveyed Lots 5 and 6 to Joyce and Bill Murray in 1971. ,, ::
� Each conveyance proceeded the adoption of tha merger resolution of � s�+,`
p Pitkin County in 1973. The parties thought the lots could be
� separated and conveyed, in this subdivision, because that's what a',� %:
k they did. There were four bther lots that were bought and sola,
� and all of them were issued building permits. The Murrays got a `�"
building permit for Lot 5. And the Munays went along thinking �'7
i that they had bought two separate lots and they conveyed them 4 ,
4 separately in 1981. Bill Murray conveyed and subdivided half
interest in these two lots, by separate deeds, to Joyce Murray. '`;
� � In 1994 Joyce Murray conveyed Lot 6 to Bill Sterling as trustee.
, { It was only when this application was made for a land use review, �
4 that this issue came up, and it was a total surprise to the Murrays �:t
and to Francis also.
. i F7ith regard to the scenic overlay review, Aley said the house was �
� moved baak from the ridgeline significantly. It was also lowered
in height (below the normal maximum height) 'in order to mitigate
the ridgeline impact. He noted that the P&Z is recommending ;;:-.,.
approval of the scenic overlay review. However, as he understands ;��.`•
it, Francis is not recommending approval and is suggesting that the r.
height of the building be reduced by three feet.
' I Mac Cunninghdm, potential purchaser of the lot, addressed the
( scenic overlay issue by stating that in looking at the property and �t,
trying to determ3ne the visual impact from Highway 82, Augie Natal
, and he worked very hard with the natural view line from Highway 82
looking up at the property. In doinq that, and they agree, that
the visual impact of the house would be mitigated from the highway ��
, by usit►q the existing vegetation and with the design as proposed.
�t___�
John Ely, County Attorney, stated that he does not see any way to
get around the merqer issue. Subdivision regulations went into
effect prior to, what was atte�¢pted to be a subdivision of these
properties, it was done without Board approval, and the subsequent '.• �
' conveyances that occurred after that did not affect the � � •
' subdivision.
� Sterling said there has been a tax bill sent out on this Lot No. ��
' 6 and one party after another has paid the taxes, to the people of "�
� the County, on that iot for 29 years; the Murrays' have been paying �.�_,,
� taxes for 24 years on Lot 6. �; .�--
i BOARD OF COQNTY COMMISSIONERB 11 AIIGIIST 9� 1995 i
�
i 4� �
;�a: �
1
t
.
3�`a-
.
,: : , n ,t.;..:..._....aK.;:. .,_..�.�-..,� ..._. __ ._._.._.....�_.._ _�_..
e _...... „.. ._v,. ........ , `��,F 1 .
.i• . . - . . .. . . . � � . � .. � . .I . `. . . . . � .1.:.
. �� _ . . .. . .. . � . . t� .
. . ~ . . ' � . 1. . '_ 5. ..
. - . . � ' . . . . . .. . -
- . .. � . . . , . . _. - . �.. ' . � . . . .
\ ... . . . . .. . . . . ,. . .
. � 11 .. . � . . . . . � .. . .
� ,
. . ... — - .s- �/ �}7: 't . . � ' . . . .. � . ' .
�Y
� �: . ' . . � . . . . . . , -
}y�� _ .. .
;�. "'' . •
.,f.
`+�
' . ��G,+. .��,.»FP�?.�?'ri.��ss•..,_. S 1442+��-.. .. . i! � `.�,�.. ,. ,.a� _ °:�.-kf.�,ttrro'�:s:t;43,,;s�:�,'��7A)9,u.u7��rnw�ss:x�ss��r�s+eTr
e, r 'y},.
r:t
• ; �;
�r:�� �'X`
'�1r..;
h'�`�...
Secondly, Sterling said the buildinq department has issued five �;•; -��,
building permits for residences on the other five lots in this ,,. �;�
: area. He said the third action was actually taken by the BOCC �.'
��.. ;.•...
i recently, in the Aspen Area Community Plan. This is one of the ' ': ::y ,
un-built upon lots that was counted in the plan. He thinks it is ;'� , "
'�; fundamentally an issue of fairness and reasonableness and what he �-:t'��
'� thinks as a just action that the Board can take because it would !,;i,.;: '
� be consistent with the actions that the County has been taking for �:rY;;,' ,r
____. � almost 30 years. f
Q �,�.E:-�`,'_.,'��`�_
� Aley pointed out that there were two previous approvals, similar
�••:-sK',..::
j to this application, that beinq the Dominique approval and the :- >�.;--
� White Horse Springs approval. Therefore, he thinks approval should � '
� be given to their application.
� Mr. Murray noted that he has a note from Tom Issac, County �°
Assessor, stating that the assessor's office propose to merge two iq
', lots in the residential parcel for tax purpoaes, which would have
saved considerable tax dollars.
;
I Bthridqe saia Maxxell has raised a aouple of issues vhioh he thinks
are important. 8e said he remembers the disaussion about white
Horse Bprinqs and he thinke the Hoard needa to look at that hiatorp l�•}
_ ot action. 8e moved to tabie the matter to Auqust 23, 1995,
pendinq the County Attorney reaearchinq these two applications and
the Board�a action. TPith a secoad bp Tuite, the motion passed
unaniaously.
� Btaff xas asked to schadule a work session to discuss this matter .��
,� prior to tbe Auqust 23rd meetinq. ;� :
' I REBOLIITION GRANTIN(i APPROVAL OF THfi MCDADB GMOS $BEMPTION FOR A
FIBTY PERCSNT DENSITY RSDIICTION LOT SPLTT AND 1041 SAZARD REVIEW -
MOTION TO APPROVB AS AMENDED - Rick Magill, Staff Planner,
introduced this item as a second reading on an application,
submitted by Jim McDade, for a Subdivision, Residential Growth t
; I Management Quota System Exemption and 1041 Hazard Review approval
� for the creation of an additional lot, pursuant to the Fifty
TA Percent Density Reduction Lot Split provisions of the Land Use
� , Code. The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 5.2 acre parcel
; into two (2) lots. Lot 1, which contains an existing residence,
will be approximately three acres in size. Lot 2 is proposed to s;
be approximately two acres in size. t
Magill referred to a site plan which shows a wetland area of
approximately 20 feet in length. He said staff was recommending ': '
that the applicant use the existing access to Lot 1 for access to
the huilding envelope on Lot 2. However, at first reading, the �;
Board found, based upon P&Z�s reoommendation that the wetland be �
replaced on a three to one ratio, that it was acceptable in this
case to disturb that relatively small area oP wetlands. �
1
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 12 AIIGIIST 9� 1995 f =
I`
� ;'
- �-•
�:
'_....'_ w:._<c.....u.+a.�.;�a.�-i.� ..w;.:..1 ma...:.:rF.�._� _:;r: . .��::•: :'..,: ... .�.,.... . . .,. �_ _...........,. a:;,; 4
� �J
. . _ . - . . . � . . , ' . � . . . 1.
1 _. . � . . � - - � . � � . f���.., . I
�
. - . 4 . � ' 1. . .. .. � •�.1�
. ...• . . .. . ' . . .<.� ��
I . . � � .. � . � .. . . - _ . . . .
. \ I . . .. � . . .. . . . - . . .. ' ' . . . � � � .
' .. . . . ... � . � . . . l� . - . , . . �
. . " .. . _..' -u .- . .., . . -... ' � . + ,
�� . . � . . . . _. . . . � .
W.
r���(Y.� - . , � ' . ,
..�',"
K';
. , . �
. ,
�i"'. _. . ._ . _ . _.._..__._.__. __._ ___._._ _----., , ,.
�. .. ' ' ..�-E.i;,
. ..y=:
`�1
➢Y.
. R�'� .7t(���1
�i�
Magill noted that there are two additional conditions in the �,.,�
resolution regarding the wetlands replacement project those being . ,.��
Conditions No. 12 and 13 for the Board�s review. One of those "t• .
�� conditions have to do with the provision that they submit a �>��':y r
�? subdivision improvements agreement, which quarantees the success � .; ,•,
� of the wetlands replacement plan. The other condition requires I�.-,
� that they submit a plan to the Planning Office to be reviewed by �;'._•.:�. "
County Land Management to assess their plan. If those two "`s_-;,;. !
conditions are acceptable to the Board, staff would recommend f;';•��. `
___;: _ approval of second reading. :°:;c. �:
I Y ..
Ethridge said he has an issue with the new proposed driveway going *e.,..�
through the wetlands area. He said there is increasing scientific '�' '
- � evidence that the more a wetland area is fragmented, the less .,
viable it becomes. Therefore, he supports staff's recommendation
that the existing driveway on Lot 1 be used for access to Lot 2. '"
Ireland opened the hearing to public comment. � ,
� Joe Wells, representing the applicant, said they only have one ,� � ^
outstanding issue for discussion. He noted that the McDades have �j
had a water right, for some time, to divert this water and create r
f-
a couple of ponds in these areas and then take the water on through �a
the site to the next pond down the street. The source of the water 1�
is runoff from the Red Mountain ditch up on top. A portion of the �
wetlands results from seepage out of the pond. A portion of it �
results from the fact that the McDades have historically irrigated
this area with a sprinkler system all night long for the last 20 �
years. The problem with the access is simply coming further up the �4
hill and basically doing a 18o degree turn to get back to the �
building site and coming down a 15 percent grade to get to the
upper portion of the building site versus being able to come across
� horizontally across the wetlands to get to into the middle of the
building envelope; that was the discussion that was had at the last
meeting and the conclusion was that there was probably a better
solution given their offer to eliminate the accessory envelope and
do a three to one mitigation down on the lower meadow. He said
• they agree with the two new conditions as staff suggested. With � •. '
,� � regard to the other conditions they are satisfied with them as `
- .-- -.- written. �
`,,.
A discussion ensued with regard to the land use code criteria �
associated with this issue.
' � Bthridqe moved to amend approval of firat readinq to require that ,
the esisting driveway be used, rather than creatinq a new driveway
through the Wetlaada area, and delete the two conditiona relating
to the mitiqation. with a aecond by Ireland, the motion pasaed j�
� unanimously. �'
�
, Tuite moved approval of the McDade appronal as amended. With a :.� .:;.`,
<,�:.:
.Y...
BOARD OF COi1NTY COMMI88IONERB 13 AIIGIIST 9� 1995 }''y '-'
�' ��
� #;''
t�; '
j.: _
. . --. w...:.:•-�..t:.L--c..,+.,:::'�..�..« _,..> .,k..n.�.-..'. . ..,__, o _ I�� �r�
% . . .. °^Y��..; f , � .
�
� . . . . . - . - .. (:��� •. �
' 4' � . . .. � . . . .�.
\
. . . . . ... . . � . ... � . a:.
' � .. . .. �. . � .. . , � � : � � �
. . : . . . � . .�. . . .
� .. . . � . . -. � . . � . . . '.`, . .. .
� �, 1 � . . .. . � � � .. �. ' � � . .
. �
�.. . . , ' .. •• . � _ . . . " � � . ` •
�'��� .
r.
,.��.
^
;�-- � � � - ' � _ .._._.. .�._._,_.,�.....�:..�...x..ic:rr�a.:r:�.uc?3•s.r,9xr:;;y;:`r��
�.r.;���e�.
�1.
:{�� n
; a,
.. . �'j���')
a
: seaond by 8thriaqe, the motion paesed unanimously. "r�� ^
_�
RESOLUTIOli GRANTIN(i APPROVAL OF T88 BOIICSER (AVALANC$8 RANC$) ;,ti�
�%T8N8ZON OF V88TSD PROPERTY RI6$TS MOTZON TO APPROVB - R1Ck
' Magill, Staff Planner, in�roduced this item as an application, �"i,�
, submitted by Sharon Boucher, to request an extension of a vested � •.�
property right for the subject property. There are no proposed
r � changes to the Site Specific Development Plan, approved pursuant �:-'".� r
to an administrative 1041 Hazard Review in May of 1990 (Mollica
� 1041) Staff recommends approval subject to the provisions of the �
� Mollica Minor 1041 Hazard Review and the additional conditions r.��"r..
- included in the resolution. :�^,;��:.
_ � �_ .
Ireland opened the hearing to public comment.
- Sharon Boucher said she intends to leave the building envelope as
proposed, and has no problem with any of the recommended conditions ��
: of approval. }�
�
There being no further comment, Ireland closed the public hearing �.. �
and brought the matter back to the Board for action.
Tuite moved npproval of the Boucher Extenaion of vested Property
Right. With a secoad bg Ethridge, the mot3on pasaed unanimously. '�
SIliP80N 1041 SAZARD REVIEW AND GENERAL BIIBMZSSION - MOTION TO TASLS
TO SEPTEMSSR 27. 1995
Bthridqe moved to tabie this matter pending the applicant�a
attendance. With a second by Tnite, the motion passed unanimouslp. ,�
� I,AND USS ACTIONS•
8
RESOLDTION D$NYIN(iTHS WILCOS CARETARER DWSLLING IINIT APPLICATION-
• � MOTION TO APPROVB - Ellen Sassano, Staff Planner, introduced this
� item as an application, submitted by John Wilcox, to request a
� caretaker dwelling,unit. She noted that the matter was tabled from .�
� the last meeting due to the applicant not being able to attend the ,
� hearing.
y
The Board approved the Wilcox 1041 Hazard Review and General 1
�!- _._.:.� Submission on July 28, 1992, by Resolution No. 92-259. The primary ;�
�5 issue in the case was compliance with polzcies and regulations of �,
� the Code regarding health/safety issues associated with avalanche
k danger. Specifically, Art Mears identified three avalanche paths.
_ � One of the paths affects the building site during extreme " �
• � conditions. All three paths cross the access route to the '�
� development under varying conditions. The main or west access
route may be impacted during high and extreme hazard periods while
{ the alternate or east access route may be impacted by avalanche �.
i during extreme hazard periods. ... .
� � ;z��:
I SOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERB 14 AIIGIIST 9� 1995 5 ` j''�
; � �' f
;1
q��1;
-.... ' ""..w�... .._......�. ',:.:a.�,.«..�..a/,...�. .....,..,..«. .,e. ..�....._... ....�..,.... ,�,1._ •-- -._. -_ V���q 'y..
--�........,�, .. ,w ..�._._, . . . . . .
, ... ._... ,..:,:.w..._., �..�::s.... ..:�:.. _�� �-�-:..
� •a
t
i . - � �
' � �
� �. _ ' t, .
s
, 'a .
\ ,
' -- - . t . .
' �� :r _
�7F.2'•: � .
,�ff,E�.`t ' , '
;a�,i.
.N".h..l. .��. ...7�_ .�Oii�°,.`[. �........ .. �A �..,. . / .. 1 ' ..re K•-._...�w..a� ..w...�.��...w. ....._�.��............--.�. �'S�ki.
r_f�Z,,.
��.
��.'��`��
Sassano said construction of the residence is close to complete. ` ,
Mr. Wilcox recently submitted a request to the building department ;�. .,.
for a change order to add a kitchen to the area over the attached - '�
garage. The addition of the kitchen will convert that area into „'!--�.1
' a caretaker dwelling unit. Given the Board's past concern relative c',•' ".y
� to development of caretaker dwelling units in avalanche prone
` areas, and those that have to accessed along avalanche prone roads, ��� �!'"� �'r
' the planning office forwarded this request to the Board for its I;�.`,::' ,"
consideration tonight. i;,:;::. ,?"
�--�.:i.
�.,;:;. ''
--- - Sassano said the unit that is proposed does comply with land use ;R.:,:;,;�;
criteria for caretaker dwelling units. She proceeded to review f,'�
these issues as outlined in her memorandum as follows: `'�'`
;`�+;,
,�.'
� i 1. Section 3-1511(A)(6) of the Code states: "Caretaker Dwelling
Units must be located in conformance with the standards of the
Land Use Code, iac2uding, but not limited to, scenic and "
environmental standards and 1041 Hazard regulations.° ;;�
In the past the Board has carefully considered approving '
� � additional units in remote locations due to avalanche hazard
- associated with access. The Board 8enied the Blattberg `;
application for a detached caretaker unit on Lot 2 of the l
" Navratilova Subdivision "based on the finding that a full- �
time resident accessing this property via Castle Creek Road
- will be exposed to an unacceptable avalanche risk" (Resolution
No. 93-44). However, the Board approved the Yellin/Lowey
application for an attached caretaker unit on Lower Hurricane �.
Road, contingent upon the determination that there would be �,
no additional risk on the segment of the road from the CCI ;�.
praperty to the Ye7.lin property beyond that already
established for the Little Annie Road segment below the CCI
_ - property (Resolution No. 93-108) .
Approval of the Wilcox caretaker unit may subject the occupant
of the unit and emergency service personnel to avalanche
hazard in direct conflict with the following provisions of the
Land Use Code:
i l �
r� � I • Section 2-8 states, "The County will prevent any use E
`-----� which may subject any person, use, or resource to natural �
� ; or man-made hazards." Section 3-SO3(C) (2) states, `
i "Development is prohibited within an Area of Local and �
State Interest/1041 Environmental Hazard Area if
� development subjects other persons or the County to
� i dangers or expenses required to mitigate hazardous ,
conditions, respond to emerqencies created by such � �
conditions or rehabiZitate improvements and lands." ' . ,
I:
• Furthermore, with respect to the issue of additional
residential development on this site, Section 3-803(B)
; states, "Development in Hazard Areas: In the event there �'�
�:'.
' BOARD OF COIINTY COMKISSIONERB 15 AIIGIIST 9� 1995 ' ��`':
P.
, '.-- u„ .::,..o �.,..< .L ,_ ��.. ._.,� _ L,... �,.,�;�_ .�,,,.-�-� • `�.".:`...` �
. � , ;_ . ��' �
_ � ;
. r } .
� � �� �
�, �; �
� .
_ ... ,. .
\ _ • :� �,;r�
, � � .
' � • . _ . r .
�: ' . _ .
,.�sr„'� . -
i�l.
,� , � .
�:�. .: .�,.. ,,.. ,
, . . . . ._ . .._ . ... _._..___ .
� ��'�_''`.
;� �,.
,.
t�..
�:.R
� . .�.��{43
is not an adequately sized hazard-free site area, the '.
diversity of permitted uses in a zone district and
permitted residential land use densities may be limited l;�
to minimize potential dangers to people or wildlife". '1
� Given the avalanche hazard that impacts the building site and z�y'�
i particularly the access to the building site, staff recommends �� ,
� that the number of dwelling units on this property be limited 3 " `
to one. �� r`
_.. 2.. The Wilcox ro ert lies within an area that is bein �'' .
__ P P Y g !?`�.
considered for rezoning to the Rural/Remote zone district, �„_
which prohibits caretaker and employee dwelling units. w,-:;
Increased density associated with accessory units is typically i�`•
� found to be more acceptable within closer proximity to County �_
services.
4
Sassano said that staff recommends denial of the request for a ,�° �
caretaker unit.
Ireland asked if the building envelope itself is in an avalanche
• • zone?
. Sassano referred to Art Mear's report, which states that one of the
paths affect the building site during extreme conditions.
John Wilcox stated that the envelope has changed, that it is no
longer in a slide zone.
Sassano said the building envelope was reviewed administratively
prior to final recordation. During the surveying process, it was
� determined that a portion of the building envelopa was in a flood ;
plain area, and therefore, there was an approval given for a minor
amendment to the plat to move the building envelope out of the
� flood plain area.
� Ethridge explained that the only information the Board has is Art
� ` Mears' report which shows it�being in an avalanche zone. A copy
- -----,j of this portion of Mr. Mears report is attached hereto and made .
� V,I a part of this record as ExhIBIT ��F��.
j Sassano said she believes that staff received another report from
- j Art Mears before they signed off on the relocated building
� envelope. However, she doesn't remember whether the building
envelope itself was entirely removed from the blue zone. But she
does remember that the access recommendation was not changed. She
does know it was not red zone in either case.
Ireland noted that the applicant is saying that he is out of an
� avalanche zone and the site can be accessed without crossing an ;�5;'
:i 3:':
,Tf_'r
a BOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERB 16 AIIGIIST 9� 1995 -
_ ^��
i ��,I`'
;
:
�
,wL;..,��......:.::..,.,�._-.N:�� .._.�_ .,�._>.........a,__ _.�_... .,�. .s.,>_....._... - �� _ �
..� ,_v r ,. _. __..
,����,
' , / . � - , � � . . .. . . . ��. �. . � , � 1 � . 2 :*
- . . .-. . - � 4�. � . - . �. .. . � �-. � . t�:;. �:
'� . � . . . l . . - .
. . . .� . . . � . . . . t.. .
. ... .�.. �" : - .. . ��:... � �%.•.'ry . . �,.•
.\ I' ' . .. - � .. . _/ ♦ ' ..
. . . . . ' - . � . , - . �.� .
. . _ .- .-- ...L.._.� . .. , . . � � .
�. . . � . . , . . . .. . ' . . . ,
+��i�r°� • : .
..t•. . ,
�!
_ __
• �'�C+ � .c.1�ru.r.13:r:i,. S� ..�.., . .. � ' ' ' d.f,l.�L;r_'ra.'"�s';i;T.::.���,.-m�i'�'J^..1:.�,W'u'.4>IY.Gi1nY+:.99 drY
; ,. .�.. . ..6 . . �,;�jcf•
•:yt.
Y' t
��
:.i�
, : t,.;��`.
;�° .
avalanche hazard area. ..
Sassano reiterated that the access to the building site has not :���i�
changed.
. f Ethridge noted that approval of this application would be in direct !..:f�l�
; conflict with what the Board is trying to do with the rural and ,
iremote policy. ` .r
,.. ..
� Wilcox said he has approval for a 15,00o square foot house, but he .
did two thirds less than that. The proposed caretaker unit is a
little spaae over the garage. He said he is going ta have a a:.
I caretakez, the only difference is whether they have a little `"�`
kitchenette or not. He noted that staff's report said a caretakar F;''✓
` unit should be closer to town. However, the Elk Mountain Lodge, I:�
� which i� a miZe away, was just approved with a recommendation for �
a caretaker unit. Also, they plan to shut the house down as they
� do the upper part of the ski area during avalanches, i _
' �; :
i Ethridge clarified that the Board has not approved anythinq for the
Elk Mountain Lodge, except for a single family unit. Also, he has :
� a grave concern about putting anymore units in a potentially hazard
area.
;
. Tuite said he voted against the previous approval, and he to has
a great concern about propagating a development.
„ Bthridqe moved to deny the Wilcox Caretal[er Dwellinq IInit
� application, based on etatements nade by ataff regardiag code
� requirements and the hazard to caretakers if we approve the
development. With a second by Tuite, the notion pasaed with two �
� pea votes by Bthridqe and Tuite and one nap vote bp ireland.
R-ESOLUTION GRANTIN6 APPROVAL OF A MZNOR PLAT AMENDMENT TO TS6
SIISDIVIBIdN EXEMPTION FQR FIILLY DEVEIAPED 7,AND8 AND A P[ID FOR THE
W/J RANCB PIID - MOT2oN TO APPROVS - Ellen Sassano, Staff Planner,
introduced this item as a request for approval of a Minor Plat
, Amendment to the W/J Subdivision Exemption for Fully Developed
Lands, which the Board recently approved. This approval allowed �
`.�:_ _ _ _ the conversion of 62 rental units at W/J to sale units. The
� applicant is proposed to enlarge existing units on the site by
combining duplex units into single family units, and four-plex
units into duplex units. She proceeded with her presentation
associated with this request as outlined in her memorandum to the
Hoard dated August 9, 1995. A copy of her memorandum is attached
hereto and made a part of this record as EBHIBIT ��G��. �
Sassano also submitted a letter from Mr. Musick associated with
this matter. A copy of this letter is attaahed hereto and made a
part of this record as E�IBIT ��5��.
Ethridge said he was involved with the W/J when Wink Jaffe owned �'`
�:":
's`.:,.
; B011RD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERB 17 AIIGIIST 9� 1995 ? � `
, �.
s� .
!�, _
, - -_....,s:_:.s.,.. .,,_ � >v,... .�.M .., __.. .,..... . ,. . ..�... ,.. , . .. , ....... . .�:x.,�.�, *.�;
� � '� .
� . a
_ - - �`' �
� . J �
t
` ' . �
_ __ _ : ._%' _ _ " _ , . � . .
�: •
j�
•���.�T' - , ' ... . � - , � .
,�iw,i: � � .
___ � ._
_ . ��_
- ...�� � _..
.. .
.
. ,:,. ..
r�`x . . _ , ,
. _ ._._. .._ _.____ _ ._. _......__.:___._
. aSr i`'
>;>.'_ t
("
,�.
f.A� '4
�'.".
. .'{a. r �.�:
::'i�i y'4i?
it. Also, there is a likelihood that he will be involved in the �•� '"
remainder of the ranch, which does not affect any of these filings,
�.� -.
but he wants to make this known to the Board. He represents the �' �`'
quorum so his instinct is to not vote on this. However, if there '•�'�
is a tie, he will vote to break the tie. Therefore, he will listen z�!'�•' ',-a'
to the discussion. •
`t._...
Dave Tolen, Housing Authority Director, proceeded with his comments �4�M1,., .. r
regarding the issue of affordability. He said he believes the :;.,,;_�.; .
'� short term issue is are these units going to be affordable to the ;:�:,;-':;��. -
. tenants who are livinq out there and hope to buy them? For the
� � � most part, Tolen said the Housing Authority Board has asked the `�''"
< tenants to take ;.esponsibility for making sure this happens. ' 'y_ '
��..'....
� Originally when this was approved, it was said that the majority
F (75 percent of the residents) had to approve of the terms of the
� purchase, the prices, etc. before the subdivision would be
� approved. And that happened on the basis of some representations
y about prices. With this proposal, the unit is probably going to ;7i
� be a higher price because it will be a bigger unit. Is that still
affordable to the tenants, and if the tenants agree that it is,
that seems to be consistent with what the Board has done in the
f past. ;�y;�
� Tuite asked if all the tenants involved were in agreement to this .�;z
j proposal? �'
�
` John Musick said this process started with the tenants, who were
purchasers. They asked if they could improve their living ;
standards without increasing their cost. Then another tenant asked
i the same question, and then another tenant and another tenant. FIe �
i said he cannot represent that every unit that is being changed has "z.�
been voted on by every tenant in them because several of them are
� vacant. One tenant wanted a unit that was better configured for
- i the type of house that he wanted on there and he agreed to a price
that he was very satisfied with. Another tenant wanted to buy an
entire duplex and make it a house, as opposed to a half of a -�,
duplex, and he agreed to that, and that�s the price he offer d. ;'
iHe asked to pick up a vacant lot in the same footprint, for t�at ,
lot that he lost. For the buyer that comes in, he will allow that �
buyer to design the home they want at a price they want. He has
''� no predetermined price on it; no predetermined home. He and the ',
purchaser will set the price together, and he hopes Dave Tolen will �,
be willing to be involved in that process so they can arrive at
something by consensus of affordability. He said there is one
ifour-plex on top and the two tenants in that four-plex asked to
, . , ( have that as a duplex. He said that a few of the people involved � .
are here tonight. . �
i
j David Schoenberger, representing the homeowners association, said
I he wants to represent to the BoCC that he was the one that ,��
approached John Musick originally with the idea because some of the �
tenants had approached him to talk about reconfiguration of their
BOARD OF COIINTY COMMI88IONERB 18 AUGIIBT 9� 1945 � ,'r--
: �
,
�.._.�...._.. __ ._._ _ ---- .
-.�a....Y,�,.:�K ..�<�.., .�,,,�� _.�.,.a,, ,..._,_a __ .._F v.�.:,..�_.,�� - �,`'
� • , 1�i
- ti
^ �'t. :
- . :' \
t �; _. ,i
. � , . . � . � a i" -
. . . . . , �: �- . . . . - . f :., � . . .
, .__ . . . . . t_ . . . � . . .
� . . . � r. . . . .
� � �.� � � � � : � � - . . � . . . .f .
C..AI": � � � . � � . � .. . .. ,... . . ' .
y .
„�9l.y;' . . . � ' � ,
`f ,
,��.
. _ ','+''��f.ar�',
YL?
r �
' homes. Underneath the guidance of the BOCC several months ago, it '�� ��'
`._�.��{[;�
was his job to make sure that the majority of the people on the ��.`!'�,�.
ranch were satisfied with the terms and conditions that were being �
laid out. and they were running with was a sixty percent rule. He G" �`'�
noted that he has 11 people who approached him with this ( �'�
reconfiguration and that is why he approached the planninq office t;,';.�'�,:�,-�.r
' to try to get this done by an administrative review. He said he (� ' .
� is still running with close to 70 percent of the second filing of ,'�,�:"
S the people that actually want to do this. Also, there are fifteen �"�'°
units that will be available over and above the people who are on !
;� the ranch presently to go into the housing lottery. `%��,5=:?:. �
� ':._;;v;�i�::.
" ' Ireland said he has a concern that the tenants (potential
� homeowners) approved this and now it is being changed and he does `' �'��`
.:;'�. :
not know whether or not that anyone will get kicked out of the
complex or priced out of the complex, as a result of this proposed
action. He suggested that the applicant get letters from those
people stating that they agree with the proposal.
� Musick said if l00 percent of the affected people do not agree with ��?
this proposal, they can have the unit the way they want it at the �, ''
prices they want; the way it was discussed oriqinally. He is not
going to force them to move to higher priced units. He said if ;"�
they do not have 100 percent consent, by the homeowners, at the r'
time they come to purchase, he is committing right now to let them '
have the unit the way it was on the deals and terms that they � �
talked about.
Brooke Peterson, Attorney for the Homeowners Association, said he �
has not had anyone, either individually, or the association, come
to him and say they object td the reconfiguration.
�'�
David Schoenberqer stated that everythinq he has represented to the �'� �
BOCC, since he became a part of this over 12 months ago, has been
. � a clear representation of honesty and integrity. With regard to
getting a letter from the tenants, he will try to get every piece
of documentation to the BOCC to insure that this moved along in a �_
steady process. He has no problem with getting a letter from the �
i affected parties. He urged the Board to approve their application �
� with a provision that he submit the letters. . •
�� ___� Brooke Peterson suggested that receipt of these letters be tied to ',
the chairman's signature of the amended plat.
I
' Ireland opened the hearing to public comment.
, , Mike Bassey and Michael Beck, current tenants, voiced their
approval of the proposal. ,�� .
Musick stated to Ireland that if the application is approved, he
, will see to it that there is a letter that will give him the
comfort he is looking for. �,
BOARD OF COIINTY COMMIS8ION8R8 19 AIIGIIST 9� 1995 � '1�`:�•
y � _
�
.. �� ''MT,af�3riLn-�.,''.' ^'VGNais`{NS.�e�Kvaf✓s a�.wD1 A.�Yi[ .�.hy� v.F.�w xl�.k .w�t..a. Y-..J4 .�k... .rv�(f..'tS .-.a.. ... �,. .Ls: '.
.�� �
� . /. . . . . . . . . � .. ^�x�i.
. . . . . . . - . . ' � � . . -.�' 'S
� . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . � _ . � V � s`:? .
. . , 1 . . � . . � .. . �1,�. �
,
. . �. �, . . ����t
. . , _. s . . _ , . . . •. : . . . - . �' �
... .. . . ' � . � .. . .. . •i- . . . . .
1 � � . , '
. . �
-- __... __,_ _� .. _. : :�:._.,
�, ' _ .
���,,. _ .
��.
MN iw��wlY� iiYlbi� w.as� ... .... _...} d . ..._... .
� � ^
,i ,}�; ... .. . l :� l�,� ,,yl�-�� �.:'�'�$ �� fss�/�
���� �.��1�/t•tn ,3`�t' ".�.4„.�j�R',.. . .. . ���.�{+N'�''!� m�`�'� . . � `r
�1�:
'i
_ � . � 'L�k��l .
r
Dave Tolen questioned how the Board wants to handle the issue of ,�'��
} cost of improvements. '-',.r;�,
i
� � Mr. Tolen was directed to work with the association to come up with
'. an appropriate deed restriction to address this issue. '.
€ , r
� irelsnC moved approval of the W/J liiaor Plat Amendment subjeat to �'l� '
¢ the tolloping conditiona: � �'�.
_._. . . -
`r�: :
� 1. 71n acceptable deed restriation drafted by tbe Housinq ��:. '
g Authority and approned by the Chairman, -
, � I �_-
� 2. 1�tr. itusiak rill qive a letter ot aommitment repreaenting �
the commitment of the W/J Ranch, ina. ia his appropriate capacity, i
vhatever it is, committing to the elements of his letter dated I
. Auqust T, 199.
3. Letters of consent from each and everp affected osrner
agreeinq to the terms of the deacribed chanqes.
Tuite seaoaded the motion. �:
Paterson referred to the last part of Paraqraph No. 4 ot the
- Conditiona of approvai reqarding the Environmental Health
Department signing off on adequate �rater and sewaqe systena. He
asked if it is speakinq about the atfected unita or all of the
unita. �
Sassano said that ahe thinks the impact of the improvementa will
affect all of the unita so the aater anQ sewaqe has to work for
. evaryone.
Ireland called the question. The motion pasaed xith twa yea votea ?
- bp Ireland and Tuite and one abstentioa bp Sthridqe.
RWgOLIITION (�RANTING APPROVAL TO THB PAYNE MINOR AMENDMENT TO A I '
DEVELOPMSNT PER1iIT - MOTION TO APPROVS - Tim Malloy, introduced
� this item as an application, submitted by Thomas Payne, to request
_,------= ; .
� a minor amendment to a development permit to amend a condition in
Resolution 94-127. The applicant proposes to purchase and deed
restrict Unit No. 1 of the Winfield Arms Condominiums in Aspen
instead of providing a cash in lieu payment equivalent to one
, . Category 1 employee unit, which was the requirement of Condition �
19 in Resolution 94-127. He proceeded with a presentation
regarding the background and staff comments associated with this
property as outlined in the memorandum from Suzanne Wolff dated j
' August 9, 1995. A copy of this memorandum is attached hereto and
� made a part of this record as ESSiBiT �'i�'-
� Malloy said staff recommends approval with the conditions as �;;
t outlined in the resolution of approval. ` � ''
� r.
BOARD OF COIINTY COMMI88IONSRB 20 ADGIIST 9� 1995
, � ! ' `.
I �:,;�: �
�
� _...,:�._ ..,:,..w:�:�,..-:�„_,__4::,...�,�..� w,.....;::e.,,.,�.. - � � ,.s-r. � _,__.. .,. __. . _ Y
.._.._ .., . . . . ._..w- --.�. _
� , /" . - _• . ..,. . . . . :;1. �� �-w.
� . ,. . � � - _.. . . ,. � � � . � � . . . .� �
�
. . . . - l; ' -,. �. .
.. . . . .., t..;'.�...
� �.. . . . f .. . . � . � .
' . . � . . ' . . ....i . . .. . . . . .
. ` . �� : . . . � . r . . . _ . . . . . . .
� � . . - . � . . . .. . . . . ' .
�: � . . . � � . . _ . . . . . •
1�fM . ' � � . � � . . .
;q�'
:�.
-�:: • , t��� ry ,���,,�l ^
� ��
.�, .,�..F�'YA.tln}J.}�.;�f .s, �'.{_`,'�,s. :i.• �L'. ��04.:- y...-�."�' �..•�-,.z�._��.7.i.W.'i����N`y�-�'.�EtN1t1rF+�'.�l�tl'��l".ryL����
. „ ,L`,
. �� � r,5
:.j+�:�R,�'
;�. �.
.�i
Dave Tolen voiced the housing authority's approval of this request. ;'r'' •`��
- i:' :�. '�J
- gthridge noved approval of the Payne Minor Amendment to a �'y -•
Development Permit. Tuite secoaded the motion. '� � ' �:�;
�c
Bick Rnesevich, repreaentinq the applicant, requested that ia the ��'r�
eveat the sale of Unit No. i falis through, they vould like to have �; r
any otber unit acceptable to the Housinq Authority. �'�
_ �,:;
Ireland moved to amand hia motion that ia the event IInit 1 ia aot '"':�^`�
available then there rill be a unit aubstituted in ita placa rhich r:.?�"`'"
is a unit comparable and acceptable to the Housinq Authority. ` �-`
With a aecond by Ethridqe, the motion pasaed unanimousiy.
Tuite moved approval as amended. With a second by Bthridqe, the �
; motion passed unanimously. ,��
CON[JNDRIIM MARHLB MINE APPLICATION BTATIIB - MOTION TO SCHSDIILB FOR -
A WORE BESSION - Tim Malloy, Staff Planner, introduced this item �-�,:.
- I as an application, submitted by Conundrum Marble Corporation, to
request a determination as to whether the Conundrum Marble Mine `�
I application can be reviewed under the old Land Use Code. He *
��z
� proceeded with the history of this application and staff comments
as outlined in his memorandum dated August 9, 1995. A copy of this
1 memorandum with attachments, is attached hereto and made a part of
P this record as EBHISIT ��J��. t
�
s
f Howard Gelt, representing the applicant, said there was a meeting
e approximately a year ago between Tim Malloy, Gary Wright and their i'�
�; engineer, at which time they did talk about this application, and �} �
_ � he has Mr. Wright's and the engineer's notes from this meeting. .F
So the challenge is whether or not the staff is accurate that
� nothinq occurred on this document for a substantial period of time.
� Secondly Gelt said because of Stefan Albouy's death, the project 3'
� has been affected because of a lack of successful management and
4 a variety of a nwober of other issues that have not been sorted
� ___� out. He said the real problem he has in addressing Mr. Malloy�s
c comments, is that this staff knew in March or April of 1994 that °;
there application was substantially complete and ready for a �
y hearing. And then 15 months later, they get a letter from them ��
� stating that it is no longer active. In December of 1993, there (
� was a letter served on Conundrum saying what they needed to remedy
to please revise and resubmit. There was no notice or no
provisions whatsoever of any kind that anything else had to be f-• , �
done. Also, there was nothing of that kind in August of 1994 when �
Mr. Wright and the engineer met with Mr. Malloy. And then 10 -
months later they get a letter that they are done. �
R;.�
He proceeded with his comments as contained in a memorandwn from �';i
Colorado Conundrum Marble Corporation. A copy of this memorandum �'; �'
f��,�; .�:-;
� BOARD OF COIINTY COlIISISSIONERS 21 AIIGIIST 9� 1995 y;'{, �
r�
,a�-: ;
, ���
;;
,, .
_ .,. .
_ .
_ _ :,�:.w..� ,.::�_�.z�.� ____ _ ,_� . .
� ... _ , '�;=
^ ; , . , �
. ,
�� � .
1 .. � - � l. . ... . .�.. •
1 _
1 I � . - . . � ' � . '�'. ' . � .. � .
� � . . . � �. . . . . . .
.._' ". .. _r . __ . . _ . _ . _. • ' . . 1 - ,
�;��, � � . . . ' . . . . . .. . . i _ .
,-�'�,��T� � . . � � . . .� � . � .
'?��
_.
_... „
�r , ' '
. , , �..��.�-:� ,. i:•._. .;. :..�: • .[� ' ....ryC .'� . " • .w:a.:l�tr�ax�r �
, .*t':n�-�.. _._,.S`e_ _. .,. . .. . . s.r,..,�i r....,_...:.�ci...�,TU?n;.�v7 t n -}:
�1-,. r .i:�;..
�t'
`:ti;).'zHNj�.�.�..
. ._.'�w.:+'�µ�.��
is attached hereto and made a part of this record as EBSIBIT ��K��. -;1; �' -
_ f ''t„T' ['.
Gelt reiterated that all they are asking for is that the 1993 code ; �. �:. -s;�
_ apply, and that they be allowed to come back and make their ; _•��,`; •..
argument under the 1993 code. He thinks this is appropriate � ' '� c"+.,;
because the pracedures were not properly followed. Se thinks there i '.,u :. .
are some real issues in the 1994 code that are over-reaching as it jj=`-:"
pertains to this project. 4
;fi r
John Ely, County Attorney, asked that this matter be scheduled for -� � '
an executive session to allow him an opportunity to review Mr. ;+:::�;r::.�
� Gelt�s letter.
, , k': �, :
;
� Mr. Gelt was advised that the Board will meet in executive session fy;:
,�, _ :.
next week and get back to him with a decision. ;�--:,
� ;ij...o. ..
Ethridge moved to eatend the meetiag to 10:30 p.m. With a aecond ii,�
by Tuite, the motion passed unanimously. �����?
i.;.,
. MINES TARING DETERMINATION - MOTION TO TASS.E TO SEPTEMBER 14. 1995 �
ITuite moved to table this matter to September 14, 1995, as per the °`�`'�c
, applicant�s request. With a sacond by Sthridqe, the motion pasaed
( vnanimously. ';��'
" 1994 METRO RESIDENTIAL GMOS FORIPARD OF 8COR8 � MOTION TO ACCEPT
SCORE - Tim Malloy, said the Moore application was submitted for
the 1993 Growth Management Competition for the Metro Residential p
Units. He referred to Resolution 95-9, regarding how this x
I application should be handled, whiah says that the Moore
application be processed under the old code in light of the fact ,``"�`
'i that they were a case in progress and were the only case which was ,
. , left unresolved in a transition between the new Growth Management �
Regulations and the old Growth Manaqement Regulations. Moore
submitted an application requesting 15 residential allotments. The
' Planning Staff reviewed that application, and did a scoring of it r=.
� and came up with a score of 78.5 and the score meets the threshold
� in all the individual categories. This was reviewed with the ,
_�.� Planning and Zoning Commission on July iSth and they agreed with
; staff's scorinq so staff is forwarding the staff's scoring for the ,
� Board's consideration.
I Bthridge moved to accept the acore. With a second by Tuite, the
motion pasaed unanimousiy.
, i
' RESERVOIR AT WEST BIITTERMILR - HOTION TO TABLS TO AIIGUST 23, 1995 - ' '
Tim Malloy said the Board reviewed this matter on July 26th and ; '
approved on first readinq the draft resolution grantinq detailed
submission. At the end of the meeting it was determined that there
needed to be a second reading on this due to the Home Rule Charter ,(��
requiring a formal resolution for cases involvinq subdivision. +�
That formal resolution requires a public hearinq with a l0 day �)
,
BOARD OF CODNTY COMMI88IONERB 22 AIIGIIBT 9� 1995 �, �'
�
� � . _....._.... ___.:_. . ._ _ . . . ., �, ...:;.-._.k... „ :,.,: .... .:,.:- .. -_:::... . . . . . . _:. .__ �i
' .'.'�. ."'-.�., _ .....:_ ._�.:. _ �.._:�:.,., . � ..,:...�. �. �::,� •. �
t
�
, �ti�
� � . . .. . . . . • ` Y �.
-• _ _ . - r(`:
� !. ' ,. ,t;•
� '_
�, , ' , , '
. i
'�: -
. r�'�iM+' • � . � . . . , . . .
;�l.
. .^'1�ib'J . ':�f"� t�t�I�f. � e-�a'.0 . . 1ti c.,. -� � , . � ' . ,.._..._ .� ...... ..._..._ _._ . . .. . h .
� °f a`^�,n,��x,-
F
- ...�,i !'.
}
i':�
i ��
� �:
� notice. Unfortunately there oould not be a lo day notice for this �1 �'�}
; meeting so staff suggests that this be rescheduled for August 23, V_ '
1995. � `+
� � �')
Tuits moved to table thie matter and coatinus the publia hearing , : -
to Auguat 23, 1995. With a aecona by Sthridqe, the motion pasaed �"�,s
unanimously.
ASSOLDTION (iRANTIN(i APPROVAL FOR AN 7►MBNDMENT TO A CONDITION OF ��: :�'' .r
APPROVl1L OB T88 CITY OF ABBEN 61Q01� STORAGB SITB SPSCIAL RBVIBA �::r7=.:
---- --- SIISDI9ZBION ���TION AND GMOS 88EMPTION - MOTION TO APPROVB -
Suzanne Konchan said the only comment she has to make is that she �r- "
asked Tom Newland to re-draft this resolution, and then it was her -r�'' : :
_ understandinq that it was the Soard�s direction that this was a one y�`.
time only exception from Condition No. 13, to provide for _
construction staging for the airport bow out, not an indefinite
approval for construction staging in the future. Therefore they
-- have addressed that issue and amended the resolution. She
requested that the Board correct that in their motion of approval
- tonight. �° `
- ireland moved approval rith the amendmenti as described by stalf, �
that it be a one time approval and that the resolution be subjeat
to tha Chairmaa�s approvai Whea that amendment is made. llith a
seaond bp Sthridqe, the motion pasaed uaanimonsly.
11WODRffi�lENT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
, Respectfully submitted, � ,
�
3.
J te ones
Cle to the Hoard of County Commissioners
;
. f
; f .
��r Michael C. Ireland, C airman�
Board of County Commissioners ��
;
I >> �.
. � l..
, jI E
I �
: � i +:
� t �-
; BOT►RD OF COIINTY COM1iI88IONSRB 23 AIIGIIST 9� 1995 � i
j ! �
i ��,?
l yf�`r
{ s: �
j �:
,
, _ ._>... _. _
. :xSYAIxJc�tc��.3uv-�.F,,,e+ri+„�.t�.+udm.iu"Ka ,,,L+-,�.ir��iw/�war.nski:�;i,.�..�J _u'.".yi'WV�+'�"°""`, . .s .
/ � t�
_ �
f�� �
' -.;: • r� . . -: �
. . ' . �� . ' - � � r,� n:�
. - � J ,�f,�$ ,
. , . '�" . ., . . � - .. . � ,:
.. � ,,,.., ..• `�:�t.
1 � s,";:" .
� :.
__: � - .
,
- - ��-- - r
- .�A.; . - , ,
'��x""" �
'��'{� �
���� � . , „
.�:;.;- ,:;,,
• «i t;.;;"k'�ri,
b :...�:_�,�ti.
F
�;
t3
. � } . . . ��a� iS:
� County Smoking Ordinance �:,; .;;, ,�t
August 9, 1995 -'�' "-.';
t•���
; Page 2 �tC_ :,� ,
- i still point to the dangers of ETS, and no information has come Ir:'.�'�'��
f forward disputing that science. The public health risk of ETS is �s,':`�°';,cy ,
still a major concern of this office. ?:°�;;,,':
��
�-r�
SPECIFIC ORDINANCE CHANGES: i-;�:?': .y
i r ;� .
Section 5-2 (a) - "Bar area" definition has been added to f -
_ - describe locations in a food service establishment where � k �
smoking may be permitted if the owner so chooses. A specific h��
x_,a ': :
addition since first reading is clarification of the distance �-.;�<
smoking may occur from a bar. The maximum distance of three y;�.�_"����
(3) feet now appears in the definition. �
Section 5-2 (b) - "Dining area" definition has been changed :'"? �
; to exclude the bar area. �#�1
k*- .,
� Section 5-3 (f) (2) - A new paragraph has been added allowing l�;;.
smoking in a bar area of a food service establishment. �' =
::•
:..r
Section 5-6.1 - Clarification has been made to the term �
"members only clubs". The following sentence has been added: ^:s'�
"A private or members only club/organization must possess a
State of Colorado Club Liquor License to claim this
i
exception." k
I Section 5-6.2 - This section has been rewritten to more
,I clearl define the rocess b which an owner or mana er of a ''�""j
Y P Y g k�xx
� business can apply for an exemption or modification of the %�4.'
` j provisions of this article due to unique or unusual
- i circumstances or conditions. Granting an application for an
exemption must be based on no resulting ^...danger to the
public health or annoyance, inconvenience or discomfort." ��.
ALTERNATIVES/OPTIONS: Allow Ordinance 94-09 to remain in place as f
currently written and adopted. t ; •
A F
_ . . Instruct Environmental Health staff to return to the Board with i
1: further variations on the Pitkin County Clean Indoor Air Act. - = '
��
STAFF RECOPIIdENDATION: Purely on the basis of public health ,'�
- . significance, this department recommends the BOCC not pass this
revision. The more restrictive language found in ordinance
94-09, which prohibits smoking at restaurant bars, is more . ' •
protective of public health than the relaxed language in the
ordinance before you. However, this department is prepared to ��
react to the Board's action and be supportive of direction defined
in the ordinanoe being discussed. �•
'+' :��i
JTTSD:WP:County.Smok.Ord.8_95 '� '' � '=
� �:,
� ;.�
� ' . �� _��� .j'.
`�i
�'. _. _ —.�`. _.._.,.
I— ---•�..y.�...�-- ___,,..�
_.....---°�.m.:ws:..�.�-.� � . . . a �'.
. . .-�.I. � . � � � .. . - . � . .. _ e f .
i
. . _ ' , . . . �A� .
� . . _ . . +u � .
� �. - . . . ' � ._ . . . .. . , . . } _ 5..
, �
. -t . � ' �� . . � . . --... , r�, J
� � ,
s - .
� . :;�' _ .
� i � . � . �. � . .� .. � - : . ' �. . .. . ..
�. . .. . . . . . .. . . . � . . .� �.
� � � �..�< �_...,� .-�' -.:� .F�.-.: � �... . . � •�.. - �. , - . - � . .t�� .
�; - � , � � • .. � _ . . � - -� ` .. - .. _.. . . . . . .'
.���'� . � , - �- � - � .,� . .� . � . � � � � . � .- . . � . �.
.h. '
.- .
� ^
, ..�: . . , ,
. ,. ,.
�. ..�� �,�„t�iar�,:.:. x a�r.. ;_. ;,. _
-=LL.-,. _.. , .:..1..•..��...�., .:�,...�_...�_y._
_ ._._._ ,r,,:_.
�',�',-.
"i
�'7''s Ca . ,fi'C•
�� `"':�;�:i
_�,�•,�
�.,, - .
�:�� -��
rt�rtox�xnvri ' "� '��
' :Si'I_,'�,�y.
f'; :.
TO: Board of County Commissioners +''� '" "���
Reqular Meeting - August 9, 1995 �f�'" " �
J= r.
- THI2U: Suzanne Konchan, Community Development Director #� .° ��
FROM: Ellen Sassano, Planning O£fice ���� �:!.'
;��_�
RE: Casey Extension of Vested Rights y:s:`���;:'-
.'�.
__-=--- —'�_----___=_---_--—=�__ —_= f:
`•'y�.
RSQIIEST: Pursuant to Section 4-1402 of the Land Use Code, the .�. ,
applicant requests an extension of vesting for a period of three
years.
HACRGRODND: An administrative 1041 Review and an Administrative ,
_ Scenic Overlay Review were approved by the Planning Director for ;;�3
the Casey property pursuant memorandums dated February 2 and
February 9, 1993, respectively. The parcel was reviewed for low �
to medium wildfire hazard, and mancos shale geologic hazard. The �
property was also reviewed for impacts to wildlife, as it is
located in the vicinity of a mule deer and elk migration corridor.
A building enveZope was approved for one single family residence �
and a barn. A caretaker dwelling unit within the barn was approved
� pursuant to Resolution No. 93-54.
, APPLICANT: Douglas Casey Trust
APPLICANT'3 REPRESENTATIVE: Alice Davis, Davis Horn Inc.
;
y_ ` LOCATION: Above Shield O Mesa Subdivision, Sections 22, 23 and 27, � .
� --- Township 9 South, Range 86 West; Accessed via Shield O Mesa Road
,...
ZoNiNG: The site is approximately 35 acres in size and is zoned
RS-30.
[
BTAFF CoMMENTS: � `
Pursuant to Section 4-1402 of the Land Use Code, the following �• �
criteria applies to the term of a vested property right: • 'r �
, .
" An approval may be extended by the Hoard of county commissionera �`
ae appropriate in their complete diacretion on a case-by-case basis.
� � The Board ehall conaider both the needs of the County and the . � �y;:.
y; applicant in determininq to extend the period of development � �;';
approval beyond three (3) years. An extenaion may be in the form `�:"
of a development agreement duly authorized and exeeuted by tha �
�'.
� !:i
4'
,i.
� ; .' .
- _.. "--.p'- — ......-wa:...<w�.:..- -�-.-�,.r �
/ �.
� ' � . . . � . . .�..
... . . . . �. �:, , '
' � - � . - � - ..: .:.
� . . . 1 .. �' . �.�� . . . . __� . . . : .. � � '.. . ti:
, {
�
. � l . �` . � �i ♦
.. . . ,. � � - :�..+�,'. .. . .
. \ . I . . . .. . .. �.'!. � �. .
. .,.: . .:: :..:: . �. . . . . .. _ . _ . _ '. i,..• ,:.. . . . ..�� ;�.� �...�-. . � .� �,-.
� " — -�- . _ :r__ . r . .
Y:�.; _
`��r"`°� _ _ ' � �
,-.�. . • �
:�� '
. ��,,. .r...�i�'Pd1�*oa5."'.��J�;��:.ti. r.k"�sv:,. ..� I«+ _.:�:: . . .,...'•oi� .. . . .. -:S,i'.!."w�;u:r��'r::u;y.;i:�1.1'eFrW-a.iL�:�:.r1u:W,fa�.u:v,t,.. .�.w.k-+ -
a
� .:'r� �� .L'..
_.�r(•
,�`
. �4•
a.�
�� �.y�'t:
'�, .'�J[.:'
applicant and the County. Reaeonable conditiona may be Lnposed by �:-"..
the Board when grantinq any such exteneion." �.. ,�.
Since approval in 1993, Staff is aware of the following legislat:ve ��`;-�1
� changes which affect this parcel: �I�l�� yr•
4: �.. ,
1. A revised edition of the Pitkin County Land Use Code be �e kI•-�
; effective on June 12, 1994. Pursuant to Section 3-807, yw tsi;...:�...':'
wildfire mitigation measures were codified. The wildi:_re �:w•;-� -r
� . . r;:�t�_�; ::
__ __ _ mitiqation measures imposed as conditions as part of .she E.;,w_
; original Casey review generally coincide with the standard � ..
mitigation language in the revised Code. However, Staff `'�,:;
:,"K'.::
recommends that the wildfire mitigation conditions be revised ;�-`
to bring the approval into full compliance with the current "�� '
wildfire regulation. -
2. The Board of County Commissioners is currently reviewing '`
County policy regarding health/safety issues associated with �� .
residential access via the Shield O Mesa Road. The road does �; ,
� not comply with County standards for grade, width, surfacing '
- or drainage. As a result, emergency access to existing and �
proposed homesites within the Shield O Mesa Tracts is p
effectively precluded. Three.options have been considered by �.
the Board for addressing this issue: �
a. Imposing a road improvement district to facilitate !
improvements to the road; �
b. Encouraging the formation of an effective Someowner's `
Association to assess properties for capital improvements �
and to maintain the road; and/or
f
c. Continuing the recent policy of conditioning 1041 �
approvals on agreement by the applicant to pay a pro- �
rata share for improvements to the road which are deemed 1
to be necessary and equitable by the County Engineer. �
(These improvements have typically included drainage and (
� surfacinq upgrades.) To date, it's been somewhat �: �
�; _: difficult to administer this approach effectively. ;
_;,_:. ;
A Homeowner's Association has been formed by the landowners
in the Shield o Mesa Tracts. Staff will attempt to contact
_. the Association prior to the meeting to get their
' recommendation as to how this problem should be addressed.
Staff recommends that at a minimum, the applicant be requ:red
to pay a pro rata share for road improvements based on .he � :.�,
County Engineer's assessment of need for improvements to °
drainage, surfacing, pull-outs, etc. Staff recommends that
payment be made to the Aomeowner's Association prior to
issuance of a buildinq permit, and that the Homeowner's �
Association implement the improvements. # �"
j '�'j
• 2 ' '1 '_
1
�
� ,i
�'l
i:
ci
� � � � . i:, '�:.
G
- --r---- — - - --, � {.
. _ ,.,______,
—�.�..W
� . �}��
� ^ , . � .' � � �s.
n ,
�� y
1 �, `
+ •�;.'.
_.-' :
\ � •I '•'�.;' ..
-�: -._ ,_, -� ,. _ . �
�: � � - - - 1
��,�„t ,. _
:,,�- �
�i�r .
,.. ; .
�`
,
�,. ,-��_, . . .
�- ..,,r�r 2i1'si't."S?f._ . i T�,v .,. , . .
. .. . ,;1,R
� . 'ir. ':r:..... ... . ....n.�, ..� .r..�..:�Li.�.�.�'.tf:u"�.�-�r�fC.t�fs!'{t.�.z°,l.r..�,�1 i�rshu�l'F+SCY'`���.mSi��IF.7i5/.�f`f�����i�'.
o':�
�
,'� � ' �t'...
:� _:i
�:� .
. .l � ._�s "uF:
� No other mapping or ordinances affectinq the approval on this �+
� parcel have been adopted and/or enacted since February 2, 1993 �
a (date o� Casey 1041 approval) . �� ;�
-� �;�
� ALTERNATIVES: �•'�::";
:� :,t':�;+
� The BOCC may: � °`.:
� ` -s.
� 1. Extend vested real property rights; or . 4�: r
c:�.
'f.;.,;;i= .
- 2. Extend vested property riqhts with new� conditions; or ,�;`X '
3. Den the re est for.extension of vested �'"`A�
y qu property rights. �.;.;
`°v�..;
RECOMMENDATION `•
, :'
Staff recommends that the Board ant a �'"
qr pproval of an extension of
• the vesting period for three years subject to the imposition of a Y1,
, condition regarding the applicant's responsibility for road .e ; .
improvements and subject to the followinq remaining conditions: -
• �:-.
,„:
1.The following conditions are for the mitigation of potential ,
impacts on nearby wildlife habitat: i}
a. All dogs shall be kenneled or leashed.
b. Fences shall be li�ited to 42" in height or less, and
faur strand or less.
.,�
c. Vegetation shall be maintained outside of the building
envelope.
2. The following wildfire mitigation measures shall be adhered
to:
�
!',i a. The access road shall have an all-weather driving surface J.
and shall be 16 feet in width. Two pull-outs shall be { ;. ,
�. -� desiqned along the road to accommodate emergency
--•-- vehicular access.
i:; �
-�
' b. The residence shall contain an interior sprinkler system. �'
i
� 4
; c. A 2,00o gallon water cistern with a standing pipe and
� hose connection shall be located on-site in close !
proximity to the residence. • ;..i
d. The areas around proposed structures should incorporate -
, landscaping with wildfire defensible space considerations
as follows:
N'..
1) Removal of all vegetation within 10 feet of �! �r;
�J 3 • i" ,�`'-
i'�
i i!,
�.�
�� :
- �' .._ �--_..
jl .
. ' ' __ _
_ / . _ .. . . �-- "_ r�...
Q � -j_.
� i
' ' 1 � 1 � `
� 5
. � � ���` j' �' . � �
. �,,,. 1:;-
�
� , •' � 'r:. "
� '�.' ' .� ��. ..'�" __"'��, -�_ � � "' ' L(.�.::; .�. -... - . :;: ��_ � .,. ,�.., ' ��:� , �. ���. • -
: . '�' � . � - . ' . .. .
�i p� .
,.,f,. �
-�. ,
r . r�;�;,.t;''
ti ;�%'.1;�.v,;
i
_ �;,
`' structures. This area shall be maintained in the ',,�..;: ,�;}
future as low ground cover such as mowed grass. `
� r..
' 2) Vegetation thinning and landscaping to a minimum of �,;.���.
-_ +a 30 feet around the structure with a minimum of 10 ..1� •
� feet crown separation between clumps :f °�'��:i,.
� oak/serviceberry, if the actual footprints are _n 4.. -"
: � or around oakbrush. Remaining clumps shall not Y•..ve '�;-;
a crown diameter in excess of 10 feet. Dead limbs ;i�;?.:,' y
and ladder fuels that would carry fire into the r?n:;: �
crowns of brush should be eliminated. Slash shall �`;.;:�=:' '
--_ - be properly disposed of by chipping, hauling away, .s�=�,;��:.
or piling and burning during a safe time period. ;:�:.e�:��;;
'; ';,y'
;J,.`,
3) Pruning all branches from trees and brush within the ;;°;:.
30' perimeter to a height of 10' above the ground ;;'"'
and removal of ladder fuels from around trees and w:
brush.
'�,1'
4) Trim all branches which extend over the roof eaves •s �
and remove hranches within 15' of the chimney. a::.
N
5) Reduce the density of fuels within a 100' perimeter `
of the structure(s) where natural reduction has not :��
already occurred.
' � e_ Any additional proposed buildings within the building
>! i envelopes shall incorporate wildfire hazard mitigation
measures.
f. Roof construction shall be Class A, non-combustible (na '
� ' wood shake/shingles) material.
• q. Vents shall be screened w/corrosive resistant wire
mesh w/mesh 1/4 inch maximum.
I h. All utilities shall be buried.
�
�
i. Roofs and gutters shall be kept clear of debris. '
�_ '`\ j. Yards shall be kept clear of all litter, slash, and �
� flammable debris. ;;
k. All flammable materials shall be stored on a contour a
�- . � minimum of 15� away from any structure.
; 1: Weeds and grasses within the 10' perimeter shall be
� maintained to a height noC more than 6". _
m. Firewoad/wood piles shall be stacked minimum 15' on a
contour away from the structure.
n. Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris. ,� �,Y
"' o. Wood fences shall not connect to the structure. ;
�; �.
i
4 i i;. ,
.� �� � "
-- - j: _ �_ ,,
���� '
� �; S j
s . � ,.
. . .. . . . � .. ' ,rr - f
� � . �. ��,/ - �,•\
� � �
�
,
� , �
. 1 .. , . ... . . _ , ,. .
� .. .:. ., , �� :�. :. , � . :.� :• '
. . ,. -. • '. . � ..
�
• -
_
. . . .. . . .. .�� '�� . . , .� ' ;�.. .
' . . ' - . . . :i. ��1 - . . .
�.� . . . -i . . . .. ..
. . . � a f_ , _ . _ . ' . �� .
"�; - .... � � . � ... . . .. .'
�i y'� , .
.f- - , -
;�a,�
• .'"�-'�a ���':ac�.�-r..�ie�]�4:�?J'n:....r�tti��.. ,.� .'v�, ���� � ,�:'aai: � _.�....�...h�'�.�,F.L"C9.rLf�:UF�.��i����xL'L:'`at+�`'�°m�:t�tei:.tRe�`r�lt�i.C�.�� ' f��r�(�i;'.
�� , �i r^J.F,
{-4
��� - ��� .��_.
� ��
'�y;� . �`'�i.
:� p. Any outbuildings or additional structures shall 3 •`:,: -.
_. � adhere to the same standards as structures. ,••;;��
' q. Fuel tanks shall be installed underqround with an '���'r�
approved container. -
r. Propane tanks shall be insCalled accoi'ding to NFPA 48 - : r
standards and on a contour away from the structure ��_';?=.. ,=
w/standard defensible space vegetation mitigation around
any above-ground tank. Any woed enclosure around the tank r �
shall be constructed with materials approved for 2 hr. r�"`»'
fire-resistive construction on the exterior side of the ���
-,.�,_; ;
- • walls.
z'.''
s. Each structure sha11 have a minimum af one 10 lb. ABC
fire extinguisher.
t. Address shall be clearly marked and visible according to ° �
� NFPA 299 standards installed on a non-combustible post
and sign. �
� u. Any fire department recommendation for individual
( structure water supply and storaqe shall be accessible
to fire department vehicles from the exterior of the �
I structure (ie. hydrant) . j
� � v. With the exception of utility service extensians, which i
shall be buried in the driveway, all development shall
occur within the building envelope designated on the site �
plan. t
�4 ' w. Residential structures shall have an automatic j
residential sprinkler system installed.
3. The applicant shall adhere to the following recommendations ,
of the Schmueser Gordon Meyer report dated September 29, 1992: � .
'� \ � a. A site specific soils engineering study shall be
, �.j preformed to insure proper foundation design. �
! b. Positive drainage shall be designed to insure that water t
!
' ! flows away from the foundation. ' �
'I c. Minor detention basins shall be incorporated around the ' ,.,'',.
'; buildings as part of a landscaping plan. ! ' '
} ..
I d. A culvert crossing shall he installed where the Lot 2 �
driveway intersects the main road.
a
�::
e. Areas disturbed by construction shall be revegetated �,�3=_�
within one growing season after construction is ���:j
�� completed. Temporary measures shall be taken during � �
construction to prevent on-site ponding. ,�,`�
,;.;
,:;
5
l..__.__.���- ,
r--�----� `"�."`.�.�.--- +�f
�' �
..' `.� . .._ .� • :,: ;.. :.;
,. t 9
^ _ `I ;. �`�, :
, � J t'
1 ± ' _� t
� .r_ �
.� _
_
�'�" , . � . .
��� • ' '
,�.. ' , �
t
.: ; • •
•�..:. � ,
-----`��!.�. :.Y_i_3�s 5a'�L"'i�c. '''r:'�.x :i i.,,:l:::._ `� ' «
. . ,...•.,. ` ` .a6d�,t:e�'Il,'a;N5x3tE � ' zm�,t,�
.. . . . _.._-'.--.. . _....:. .._. ' F.� . .�v
....._- r�.
R�
> '
�'
A.�. . . � . . . .
r'
��P, 1%� '
.. . � . . 4 ��l
.� 4. The applicant shall pay a pro rata share for road improvements �:'. '
� based on the County Engineer's assessment of need for '• �
im rovements to draina e surfacin #''; -�,: •
P g , g, pull-outs, etc. Payment y <.. ,�,
shall be made to the Homeowner's Association prior to issuance
of a building permit, and the Homeowner's Association sh=11 �.'i "
, . i r:
implement the improvements. ;�
,,�?�.
5. All material representations made in the public hearing .d -^fi. s'
in the application shall be adhered to. 'f`'= �
-= els >� s
. memo_casey_vre
}� ti;z
^;`�r•
_ �i�d' �/��o� , `a :
d ��
,; � ��
, ;�.,
�a:
�j.
� � � �s
ct$
" C
� i`
3
{� r���
.' �-
\ ,
- l� ��� .
.� �
�: . .
?
_ .',
- . .. . � ��i.
r ,
. � � - � - � � � �.
��,
. . � � . .. . . � . . f"flR. .
. �� . . . . ! t �h�,
I �. .f
, � .. � . - . i '.
; 4 1',
i � I.
�i
I 6 �17 �1.
r
' ' !• , � I ,
. � �, . . ,; _�.�, . - . . � . _ . . . �art ,1:�_ ��.:
\
` . / a ..�F�� �r fi? ..:r��rY a ,.._�af l� M�.r .
\ :i �M�� Y" 1 'A. .I'� Y
. .,lY�."� "�x�'1f ��` x ...i T ��i'T ..
.� 1 �7 4 �+ .tCa�ah"�}�u T;� � ;� 1 ��.� Y �k�.`�.
. j Y� Sn +� i : f � ''�C
�' .�`-1M f+�1asr�'"'N'�^'At., '}� +.�}� '� ` �� �� �' : / � � �r�w. :y
�', �,�+ ✓s't��"'�'" �j r-�"i K ° b { ,: _ fi�x y ���
-y,�.`�,y+����ti'Aq �'"� � r ti � �� ''� �� � � � ' fX�, .
�,Z���f f 7 7 Y '`�4� �,r+ �� �[ � L 4..
``' 1 .��°� � � '' Y f� e r
,}4-erx� � '. �t. t , e. ,.-{ i
r tF t
��� -�.� �i,.�t� pJ Y �.�� .
2. ��t3 � �� �� i �� / � ..
. R,i��'.�'�� y.. �� � � ', �� � ��.
� �'� �.� - �l I�.
T;l f l" at !` �\ �.•
�� � + � � . ' , .
r �
,� ''� �,�c� I 4� . r� .
.��' r. `r �w � , �i�-+�"` � r,!
�Ts"�' .t �� -
. . . . . . . ' .. . _ , t .. . � , .
;.:rg; . ' .. . � . . � . . . . . �
a�
.,y. •
, �
��/a-'�..::` ��..i�h -_wYiG's+'i c- �`_ �, . . . .. � �
� . . . ` ,::tl�^_�..nfir-,YN-:Lt:ti!qcAaen'hAm.:�.ro�em<..r.:wrc^_sxw.......s..-.� ..
FE6-15-19% 17�56 FROM nASPENiPITKiN BLDG DEP7 TO 992051% P.01 � �`�'
� *axr�ar�ltal Merno �n �^^� � *�,�.Q���^} .� ���',
rc.11a.� �>a:.��e...+.a �'4�• ' I ^ ,� �
,; . ,�Lan...v..v..;��s�.,,�4.�W.�.wt � �.....�e.t•�s i�rl�aas� �l"1-'�/�!J �+° "�+L�4`;
�� I�
• �54 39 'r°'°�. �9 43 e( � yw+•� � y.t SN : .
,:V � • {� eti.;w. �w. I��• �rre+i .. .
y � �G�� .�tiu.t_�G��Q ��A..3.o� [�1�.�� : . ' ��
. --_Y , , . � 'r:�,:'f,
;� . .
� I-.`i'...��
� ��3 . �.�. .....r :� • I� ':
. '� � • • � `_"y,7 �.
--- - ' � I • 1
. . ; 1 - , ' � � � � .. �
�wg. a. �s9s j ,"�::
• isp�n plxnut�Aopat'tmsne `
I , �es� 111�a sarsano . I
� � � �: s63e1d'0 Naaa tte�eora�r Rcad�mpro to
[ .
� � �us'suant to your xvq��ut Eor�iCt�a coc� x+ption Ehat.tke Shl id'0 - �
�rai aenewwr� I7rs�n.[csr relsrseG o aa sw�� acw uct veip 1 _
. . . . , ' 8'Kwy�S �ad S�z�OV�o°°c 1uaa�ag lra4 1 1QS1 1'�1rib�aPP�� aaEO � � � :.c.:
i � pripr u'your iesufag appmnraL or qranc se►�ceoqtiva•or stsa
ri�ca ot prior approvaie. i
.� � � � lleade accepc chia latter aa ceqverced. � �
� I � , SOrt[ i1Y Ot7QgwGk1FQ ChOC soed impzpo lvt7�itlq s6hcul I b+ � �..
'. . � •�r�qi.irad !mn all 30�1 l,azard rwiw 'eancr pr�fl co ix
:k+e.U�i tJ3vea my ayprwals iram we Conn y. 7cc i0 ouY Ciem
• Ch�t aLL�aptit�ea�s,ta :equszed,co p y zY o.t.tLe_s� '
! +�timtad bullding casE`ae !t �jipears 0o tme �a:t,w;.` t �
I :q�ItriC�,i�n: '17na Lte neeAe ta'be ap].1 .eid grior Co'tLe i
. � - f.i;,y.�pg��t. 1Lea� S�p__ Le�d•is;a 5ClQ[ r.. �
� i�nt acco�mc aed diapes'aea vnea varioua sepaS�rs, ral
� � liinteaio�,e an1 Se10Y�iCV�.LLJ dYY GO��l� oa CHO Cq71�04 O� � � ;CC
� � che �uLqivi�iaa ia azmr ro keep the ro+a ia l�8nima1 �ty � -
� sYanOard comO.itioa�. • � - �
� � � � � �Sh�S'�O�W.as+.slxo aativeiY Pnre�+ing an aLnual laadaaiari Lu raa ' . • � .
:all lmd�orn�rr ta ler Gq� 'coed Sa MOiaif/R1 ewt��'j{I�,e 3
' �.i � ' �CCpy6t��iLd ;d Y�76��9OdiQ�OII V�I��IS6tOLL�� Z'01t1 IDi{IILB�IC!_ .. i �
t
_ . . . � 1 ''��P.'Sd�.S1Y�lt1C9 LbiC�/OII Q�.iCO tll i�liX'i�II�-1�-i�.l. �1 � {
� ,�av3�.t,+. or qrrne� �n ocw.�im oe vestea r�rr m aay i
� . °z+DD�ovs� . �
� TLaak you tot tLe aa6lstanoa in t61e �nac r. . � �I '
� _.- c� i .9ine�s�ly , � t
� . . ����� I �
: �a, sacaaac .. ' ' �
{ t.o, nox ;� -" ,
.� � . - ; . .74iPW+r Co. �Sf1S ' 4 � � .
, � � . � ' � � ..� . . ; t .
� � � � . � . i . . . . �
' 1 i
j : i i . � 4M
. . . . : , � . . � �.�r�'y'
� � � ' y . • . : ��
.. � . 4 �. � � t
.� . � , � . . . � . . i 1�j
. ' i I ;�,
�
' 70TAL P.01
------....•".e.'.'...-':..�""'.."""._ __"J " - - �.....,:._..e------- --- �a,
' / ' , ��t�I, y
.`` . . . . `' . - . . - .. rl..��:� .
� - .� . �� � .. � �. - � . , . � . .
. .. � .. .. � . . . . . � . '
.` , � �.. �. -' �'�' - .
. . _. . .. � . . � . . ' . � . - �. ' , .
. . . . - — ' '. _{.,_ .. . . . � � � � .
. .�'. . . � � .. . � ... .. � - � � � ' ,
. tyei���++'a` . . . . _ � . � . . . . . . .
�ez
k� �
,�. ,. �
,
... ,
J_ .. ..�r� . �y�
�Ve- :':t :..fi wAw.:&-�i��`�S'.__.�.Y�k4ia�. -�.,..'�_ �':3:,.. .... . � �.... NC3: �.r.:_.._._ �:,t��ti�:.�{r�.l':�� +1' �f'�L3�h.�i�t�.hY�i;���.R f�,y1{i:r.
� t �i.��.j;
' �,
' ' � •Q-�S �, 'F.;�; -`^
. ,�,e•'
? MEMORANDIIM '_
�i1' :..
TO: pitkin County Board of County Commissioners ,� '
__ y^1 Regular Meeting - August 9, 1995 ' :-�' �
tr:�
t>s
;� TffitII: Tim Malloy, Deputy Director County Planning `::4 . ,:
:i
a :<,
r FROM: Francis X. Krizmanich, Planning Department .',t '
� r
RS: Murray Lot Separation, Conceptual Submission and Scenic •fY�
_...:.._. Review '- :
-..�'�`a�..:.
. _�_____�_`_ ___' ___� ___�_'..�__ �::y.�;'
�.'
IBBIIE: The applicant requests approval to separate two merged lots
(No. 5 & 6) in the '�West Buttermilk Subdivision". The main issue � ��!� .
,..a, .
appears to be whether the lots in question were ever legally �
� subdivided. If the lot separation request is approved, Conceptual �Y-�
Submissian approval is also requested. This property contains ,,
mapped 1041 hazards, including steep slopes and wildfire, and is �
" also within a mapped ridgeline area. `�."- �
Lot 5 has an existing residence; lot 6 is vacant and unimproved i
; except for a metal building on lot 5 that encroaches over the ';i`�`
proposed boundary line between the two lots.
:
APPLiCANT: Joyce K. Murray Charitable Trust �
ZONING: The lots are zoned AFR-10. Each lot is slightly larger than •
_; two acres. :��;��
d4.'
' LOCATION: The property is located at 1422 West Buttermilk Road.
REFERRAL BGENCY CO2�Il4ENT3: (originals attached)
I 1. Pitkin County Airport: The project site is located within the �`'�`
Airport Medium Hazard Zone. High 1eve1 single event noise may '
_;; be deemed a nuisance to residents and guests. The applicant �� . •
should be required to enter into an avigation easement with t
y � the County. .
I 2• Environmental Health: The Environmental Health Department
a�
� recommends the following conditions of approval: .'�
� . . • An adequate supply of water must be documented for the �:
property and the location of the well must be determined ►-' � '
before the septic permit can be issued.
i.
� • A septic permit must be applied for and issued by the
_ I Environmental Health Department before the building `�I
Ipermits can be issued. : �, '
r ';-�, �:
� �� .� � � � � ����r I��'� =
!` ;:t
, s'�
_ •:ii � �
, � `
� ,:=�
i �
y
, _ ---- -- p
_ I _._.. _ ,,..,,,...�_— --., a�f :
�
/! �'�'?�
. . - - / 1- ... � . 1..
i
.. . . .. t�; r v
1 �' � `c:
... , _.
i ,, . y. . . ' ..-
` ; - ..
•`..`_ _ /
.. . ,
�: -
'�4'� _ ._ �
t: ' , �
,�.
_�:::_ . -�..�..<
���o-'�-,
' �.� . �.ii%.:i�l:pt'
�,.i 1�t:..j.
�'
�{:
� . , �.
�i@
• A fireplace/woodstove Qermit must he applied for and ''�i
issued before the buildin `" ��
g permits can be issued. "�° .
3. Zoning: General comments have Heen provided; they are ��`�
attached. � �'�
� ` .
__.� >'
..s � :""L'-
� I38IIES: . :1;` �
I. LOT 3EPARATION i r
;I ��
_ Section 6-503 of the Land Use Code provides that the Planning
�- Commission may permit the separation oE legally platted substandard `�"�`
. F�..;asCi,_� .
size lots; however, because this application includes Conceptual �.:.�.:
Review, final approval of the Lot Separation rests with the Board. "�"'�''
_ The criteria in Section 6-503 are as follows: �c :�
A. The lots must be located in a legally platted subdivision.
� ,' ? .
Staff Comment: Part I of the application provides information .� ,,
regarding the creation of the lots. The application indicates that
a plat was recorded in December, 1966. The first subdivision
regulations in Pitkin County were passed on June 6, 1966. These
regulations required subdivision reviews and approval for the
creation of lots of less than five acres. Because they are all �
approximately two acres in size, it appears that the six "West
. Buttermilk Subdivision" lots were created illegally. The applicant �
has raised arguments for relief based on other "subdivision" �
approvals, notably "Aspen Oaks, which is adjacent to this �
subdivision, and White Horse Springs on McClain Flats Road. The
staff notes that both of these "subdivisions" contain lots in �
excess of five acres each - they were created legally - in those
reviews, the main issue revolved around the merger of substandard
size lots ahd whether they constituted "platted" subdivisions. The
� baseline issue in this application is whether or not the lots were
legally subdivided.
. ;
B. The subdivision plat must have been legally recorded with the
� County Clerk in compliance with all subdivision laws in effect � •
iat the time of recording. �
� � Staff Comment: If the
--�� plat was recorded in December, 1966 as j
� indicated by the applicant, it was recorded after Pitkiri County's E
subdivision regulations went into effect (June 6, 1966). The staff
notes that the title of the recorded document is "Plat of Survey"; i
, it does not purport to be a "subdivision plat". �
� �
C. The Commission shall approve, deny, or limit the separation �
of cumulated substandard size lots based upon consideration
' of the criteria in this section.
1. The number oY substandard lots developed in the area and
z �. .�-'_
� 4 :
� I'
':
, s�: t
�,: .';
. � . . - . ti,. .
��
I,'
� �. _ _ _ _.�. • �.�. . __" ..w���.._ J .
� .• . S�i+� .
�Y
�/,.. - . . . . : _ � ' �.
_ . _ � . , . � . . . `-.. . �'' ���
. , ^ . _ . . i �.^+ �
' . .�� . . �� � , �. - - . �. . . .. '.
� . . . . � . . .. .. . .'."i 3, . ... .. . , . .
� . . . . . ' . . ,
. . : . y :�_.• . . . . � � . � • . . � . . .f �.
_ �: � � . . . : � .. � . - . � �. . , - �.�. .� � . � .
. ."e7�� � .� _ ._. � .. � . . . _ . . . . .
,P .
i �
. .:�.rnif'ip?ti>%
:,. 4k:., yj;.
{
'.S L.
;�; the effect of separate development on the character of �;� ,�'
_� the neighborhood; �.�? :'�.'
..;:1, I. �.�
':� Stalf Comment: Five of the six "lots" are developed in this L•,,.
' "subdivision". The Iots in this area range from 2-5 acres in size. x '
��,� Separate development of this lot will have minimal impact on the �'�'�-•'�
-� character of the area. ' i.,,
� c�:.,:...'..
2. The extent to which the lots comply with existing '�'�- ;
i subdivision standards; �;�;.:>'.�� Y
. . '_Y��:.��..
Staff Comment: The lot has good road access, ample buildable area �-'=�` '
.,.
and room for water and sewage disposal. If the lot separation is "� ��
approved by the County, the State will issue a well permit. The �.�` :
zoninq for this area is AFR-10; the existing four acre (Lots 5 & <,r-+`
6) parcel is nonconforming and the resulting two acre lots will be ;�;<;�i .
nonconforming. �k:+
3. The effect of separate development on available �
utilities, roads and other public services; I'��-.
� �
, � 8tafE Comment: The impact of one additional home will be
negligible. „ ~
_ ��
4. Any physical limitations of the lots; �,r;
Staff Comment: Portions of the lot contain steep slopes and severe
wildfire hazards, but there is also an adequate hazard-free area 5
for development on the lot.
I 5. The configuration of the lots as it affects their _
_„ I suitability for separate development;
: I Staff Comment: There are no physical constraints to the separate
- �� I development of the "lots".
I 6. The degree of economic loss to the owner if separate
� development permission is not granted;
; " Staff Comment: The staff opinion is that the economic "loss" if � •
separate development is not granted is negligible. We do agree
:�!_ with the applicant that separate development of this lot would
,� result in significant economic "gain". :
7.. The history of acquisition including a consideration of �
- ' the purposes of the purchase and whether or not the lots ;
were involuntarily acquired; and
� Staff Comment: The lots appear to have been separately and �
' voluntarily acquired in the early 1970s.
i
� 8. The historical use of the lots.
` 3 �•.
�
, � ' � �,
� .
I - -- -- _- --- - �j '
--� �.�
. . .
, . . . .
I Y y,
� .. ... . . ��":' �
�
J' I ;�
t :
�+ � < < -- �' �
, . ,
. _ �.
..
. s . ,- , .. s
�, :
i � �,, .
1 '; ,
. � _ . '.
_ �,_,
�
.�. f; � , _ .
��� _ � .
,} .
.�
_
..v.••. . . ' . .. .. . . - � . .....ca...-.[�a.�......c::..!�]�N 2':AlLA.1:.witi.klll.'cY'i.iEt�S`+'�.�ar'L��u+'k:�;A}Tp�,�?�f�
.. , . . � �.4i'!���
1,
; � ..
' j . �.+3 .�p'1
"r� Staff Comment: Lot 5 was developed with a single-family residence I ,
, k_j in the 197os; Lot 6 is undeveloped. `-`,"�
zi "'!i•.,J
:j;'':°
�` II. GENERAL REGQLATIONS . �:>:
� c
'c
� iodl Hazards `f:
� 45 . r
The property comprises approximately two acres, contains steep ��`'P •
sloQes and is mapped as containing severe wildfire hazards due to ,.�>�.;:-.;.,
__ _ the steep slopes and thick, mature oak/serviceberry veqetation ^� '
` y .M :
occurring on the slopes. . ,,,�,,.-
��K...�.:.
Slope and wildfire hazards on this property can be avoided by
proper building envelope placement. The area of the property that ,-`a� �
is between the ridge and adjacent to west Buttermilk Road contains
slopes of approximately 10�. Because of the wildfire hazard 't� .
� associated with the steep slopes and thick brush on the northeast ' ..�-;
; side of the lot; the building envelope has been reduced to avoid
: the ridge top and steep slope area. ";
The applicant has committed to incorporating the standard Pitkin ,
County Wildfire mitigation techniques. The staff opinion is that ,,��
the proposal adequately avoids the hazardous portions of the site.
The staff notes that referrals were sent to the Aspen Fire �
District, the Colorado State Forest Service and the Pitkin County �
" Sheriff's Department. None of these agencies provided comments.
..�'�
�
zII. 3cenic Overlav (Section 3-604)
_ The Scenic Overlay Review criteria and staff comments follow:
1. Whether the proposed development has utilized existing kf•
topography and natural vegetation, such as ridges and hills
to screen buildings to the maximum extent possible. •
$taif Comment: 1�t the Planning Commission meeting, the staff !
'�_, �` recommended that the enveloge be reduced to avoid the ridge top and '
northeast hillside because these areas are highly visible from �'
Highway 82. In response to this recommendation, the applicant has
indicated that the home will be set back 25 feet from the northeast
_, edge of the envelope. The staff notes that portions of the
�! proposed structure will still be visible from Highway 82. This , � f �
criteria requires screening "to the maximum extent possible". The
staff opinion is that there is sufficient land and topographic
- relief on this parcel to allow a residence that cannot be seen from �'
the Highway. The application does not comply with this criteria.
The Planning 'Commission recommends scenic approval of the
application as submitted. ` ��'':
t
4 j
• 4,t� �
Y�
i �.��
�I
.. ._.. .... . _.. . _. .
�
�—. - - ,,.,., - — ���..d
/'� .. ' ... . ,� � - .. � � "R...
, . . . � .. " . . �.. �,� !
. . . . .. . � �� . \
�\ - ' .. . . •�
� . � . . . � . � . l�. . . �� i
. �� • � . .- � .. � .f � �
' . . �. .. . ` .�.� . � .
\ i, �-
� .: . . . , .
. ; . /
�. ,-� ,. • .
�r . _ .
':��2m� . . ,
<
y
� ,
.��
:��;:.. , , , � ., .�
_ . . _ . . .... _ �..� . - :;.,��..,�,�__�:,�..,.�..... ,.x,..
_ �;,
• ;a,: �i':i
�:,:
' _ ;i.f
d'' `;•� ;
�=- �,i
2. Whether the proposed development has been designed to ;�;'�'•�'�
complement the natural topography of the land, including, ,•#i� -�,, ., ,
',+ whenever possible and appropriate, the utilization of ;%•;,..'��
`•� innovative architectural techniques such as earth sheltered ��•� ��•'�..
�-�,a..,: `..y.
-�� design, natural materials and coloring, non-reflectability r;_ �., �
and clustering of structures on the least visible portions of �
';� the site. ��'j
� i �.
k 8taff Commeat: The applicant has indicated that the home wiZl �;
a "step-down" the ridge; building elevations are attached. Because �%'<•• -
= portions of the structure are visible, the applicant should address ��'`��r
the use of architectural techniques to mitigate scenic impacts. ,�`x �'s�`^`
A condition of approval should require non-reflective roof •`��`�
materials. � ;`;`�
r
i
3. Whether the proposed development's height and bulk has been �i.�f�
designed to avoid, to the maximum extent possible, the i��� .
visibility of buildings from the highway and public ;�x.�?
viewplanes. pt�9 . �•
� Staff Comment: As stated previously, the staff opinion is that a �;ra '
(I home can be constructed on this site which completely avoids scenic •• '�4
I impacts by either lowering the heiqht of the home or moving it
I further down hill from the ridge.
i
- 4. The proposed structure shall be placed so it does not break
; a ridgeline, unless there are no alternate building sites on
the lot.
Staff Comment: The proposed structure will break the ridgeline. ;���`
There are alternate building locations on this site. The proposal �
does not comply.
5. Whether the proposed development has avoided the location of
uses on the highest ground or most visible portion of the site ' i4,
as viewed from State Highway 82 and public rights-of-way,
identified in Section (B) (1) above.
Staff Comment: The development has avoided the highest and most ,
`'�_ visible portions of the site; however, the proposed residence will
still be visible from the Highway 82 corridor.
6. Whether the proposed development has been located outside of
- the designated Scenic Overlay, or on a suitable site at the
` greatest distance possible from State Highway 82 and � . '
identified ridgelines. i "
Staff Comment: The proposed building envelope includes the mapped �-
ridgeline.
��� .
7. Whether the proposed development has been landscaped in ,_•, T �.�:
,
5 �..,,
, I
I`c:
' t'�
. . I . . � . 4�-�: 4 .
___ /�---� -- �---'�— . _ —,,... �F��x' ,.
1 _�,_,__—_ ��`:
. � ' � .. ' _. ��N 5�•,•
+r
. . .. . . . . .. . . �M1::
� `. � �
� �.: . ' { . �.,
� . .. . . . .�., � . ..'
!S�� . . .��.. �:..`.:
' . . � . ��' . .
��'. � . . � '.(;'' . .
.`' i. .. • ::• . . ,. . �I . .;.' .. . . ".. - .
. . .. � .. . . . . . . , . ... .. . r
'.. . � � • ..:/.-..�-s ' . . '
�� � � �• � .. . . ' . .. . . . ... .• -� � . " .. � •
�7�'''� - _ •
_ _
.
. •
..., . , .,
,
, �cr'..� �'�:,+'� !'a4ik'?,iP._: r�f�.�u. - .. in �-r� .. . ` - : ...... r �:°r'-'b"i:.-r'uv �,.F.. b: ,r;"_""AS
, •,�. � `'
. .M.,. ... _ .eo, � _. . ...tdb.rt.:+�n�is:r.a_u.il�"JiS'�' � �il'r)27.:..3;1' :
:..4y f��.
r..�rtr.
.:..r r �
._; . ,:
. . �.�' }�'.��`.
. . ���..i� .`�f•:
accordance with the adopted State Highway 82 Corridor ; -.
landscape guidelines and has preserved natural vegetation, to �, �y�
'�;; the maximum extent possible, including the avoidance of
� development within irrigated meadows. Existing vegetation ' �'�
Si
� shall be maintained to the maximum extent possible, while ';•'�,;�z ,
� using existing vegetation to screen development. A -
landscaping plan shall be submitted by the applicant and I`�:-'
approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. f;;'•`.<", '<
1�-.:. �
etaff Commeat: The site is not located within the Highway 82 �� ° `
__ ._ corridor. A landscaping plan has not been proposed at this time.
The staff o inion is that landsca ''r `
p ping is not necessary on this site ,�� sr.t: .
because of existing vegetation and the site's distance from Highway "-;„`�,.
82. The staff opinion is that lowering the house elevation is the
best technique to mitigate ridgeline impacts on this site.
8. Whether the proposed development's exterior lighting has been �a"
designed in such a manner that light sources, such as facade '�9
and landscape lighting, will not be seen from public rights- •c
of-way as identified in Section (B) (1). In addition, an :
' , application shall be consistent with the lighting regulations �
identified in the Pitkin County Land Use Code.
�
etaff Comment: The applicant indicates that no lighting will be `}
visible from Hiqhway 82 and that lighting will be consistent with
the Land Use Code. The staff notes that specific lighting plans
have not been provided. However, if the structure is allowed to
break the ridgeline, it is likely that light from windows on the
north side of the home will be visible from Highway 82.
',E�`�
9. Landforms and earth moving shall generally not be acceptable �4.''
• as the sole measure of compliance with these regulations. F
. However, they may be utilized in conjunction with other site
techniques designed into the development plan. These methods
may be acceptable when utilized as one of several methods to
� complement and enhance development, rather than as the single '
device for screening development from view from the State �
Highway 82 Corridor and as mapped. , �
�
•'� Staff Commeat: The applicant has not proposed creating landforms
,-' or earthmoving to shield the site. The staff opinion is that the
location of the building envelope and building height are the two
critical factors on this site.
� . 10. Whether the proposed development has been designed so as to ;
avoid, to the maximum extent possible, any Scenic Viewplane
identified on the State Highway 82 Corridor Master Plan and
Down Valley Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Comment: The site is not affected by any mapped Scenic
Viewplane. �
��
�.;�
s:s 6 '� _
�i.:
� �,. . . � . . . , - i.,,
�� ''1
� y1
�-�.,.�,,,..�,�..,.r.. �.--- . ��� __-- -----�--- -- -- -
. � . .. . � . ��1r^{. ,��.
- _. . . . . . � . . t -�'�
���5r.•: F
, �
�'� .
, .
� :,.
� : . . . . ---- `
. .
- � . ` , :.: S., '..
� . : �,: .`
� 1 . ' . . .I.. .. ' , . �. - .
� � ." ' . .1_.._._� � � • . ' , '' � ( ' .
�: - . . . .. � . �. .. ' ... �� ... . . . �
. i��� .. � , �' ' ' , . � . . .. � . . . ' - � , •
�,Pr�• �
_ _ �..�.�_ __ _�_....�.�.._
�� _.._---
.. ' , , __ _�_.;,.,,. ..�
,,;,_
::#%%.i�,r k;-.
. . e..
1' b
� F} }.
11. In the case where 1041 hazard areas may be in conflict with �.,, �-
_ preservation oP scenic areas, the Board acknowledges that 1041 � �•.'.
issues take precedence over scenic concerns. These issues �.��
shall be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. ",�,,.��
- 8taff Comment: The staff opinion is that revising the proposed �'��;�i.,�
-� building envelope Co avoid the ridge and steep hillside e�':.,..':
aacomplishes the dual goals of avoiding wildfire hazards and scenic ��-
s
,'�, impaats. ,'::. �f
� ��
ZV. GENERAL STANDARDS
.._: -!� �� �
• Air Quality (Section 3-602): Any woodburning devices will , ,��; :
have to comply with Environmental Health Department ,�',''!.'�,
� regulations. r
� Water Supply (Section 3-1104) : The staff opinion is that the �:Q, '
State will qrant a well permit if. a loC separation is t,�
approved. The applicant must satisfy Environmental iiealth
Department concerns regarding supply and well location prior �
. to the issuance of any buildinq permits. �.p .~
:
• Sewage Treatment and Collection (Section 3-1105) : The r
• applicant proposes an individual sewage disposal system.
:�
• Roads (Section 3-1107) : An access dXive to the homesite can
be constructed which meets County driveway standards. '
, SIItgiARY: The application proposes the separation of substandard �
size lots pursuant to Section 6-503 of the Land Use Code. Section '
6-503(A) states that "the lots must be located in a legally platted i�
subdivision." Based on the information available at this time, it
appears that the lats were created after the adoption of County
Subdivision regulations and are therefore not legally created. The
- staff acknowledges that five of the six lots have been built on.
Review of building permit information provided no clues as to why
the subdivision issue was not previously discovered. Even though �`
- . the other lots (including Murray's Lot 5) have been issued permits,
the staff cannot support the separation of a lot that was illegally ,� ; '
created. This issue was discussed at length with the Planning
� Commission. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the �
A Scenic Review i£ the lot separation is approved by the Board 3;
. (minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are attached) .
The staff notes that we recommended an additional 3 foot height
- reduction beyond that approved by the Planning Commission. It is
' ! the Staff's opinion that a home on this site can be lowered to ;"` `'•�
i completely mitigate visual impacts without creating an undue
` hardship for the applicant. ,_;
� RECO1�4tENDATION:' If the Lot Separation is approved by the Board, �
: the Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of Conceptual �
' , �^�,
. ' 7 ' � -
�,
�' i ,
j • Ei
� .�__... _. _ .. ,�,,,�.. _ .r... _-__--__W . • .�. — _.-----"'�..,_-. .S�v4s _ .
.. � . ' . . . . .� �. �
1
l
/' .. ... . S, . . ; y'.
' �
..— . ... �. . .. -- .. . �� J
•
� �1
. � � , . . ���. � . ' -.S`,i
. � � , .. . . . ' . � . . . ,. . .
. . � ' . . .. . ' . . - ' {., . . - . ... . " . .
.\ i. .. .. . � � . . . . .. , . ..
� i
.. � r . . . ' .. ... . . ' . . . . ! .
. . . ..':' . . . '`'.:. . . , . �� . . � .� '. .
�; .� . . '. . . .. � , � � . - .. . . � . .
. t���� , , � � . . .
;�j.
•'��tie+ � .. . .. � y�
. . ..........�_' . �. . . � . . �. . � ..�._.�..�. . ' �_.�::�..._. .n.>.a_.:.....�:��... �.
. . �•�S I/n'�,}�ii
y;; � 1 �i.
- �^
;�,y ;
S�; 2�i�'i
Submission subject to the following conditions: �.
.• .c'
�' 1. The buildinq envelope shall be revised as discussed at the �`"
hearin to avoid severe wildlife hazards and scenic im acts ��'��'•�`�
' 4 p 1.,.: ;.•..
� by avoiding the ridge and steep northeast face of the lot. '�.'� '
t,s
2. No development other than the access drive shall be located �4<
; outside of the building envelope. �"'f s:
� I 4 r
3. The following conditions shall apply to mitigate wildfire � �
--� hazards:
�y�
a. Defensible space: The area around the structure shall �s`�'`�`
'�'':i�t�� .
incorporate landscaping with wildfire defensible space
considerations as follows: `''�;<:';=.
NOTE: Actual vegetation manipulation to meet these ��` w
conditions may not be necessary where the natural �:�7 .
vegetation patterns have already fulfilled these ; ��
conditions.
- 1. Brush, debris, and non-ornamental vegetation shall � �'��;
, be removed within a minimum 10 foot perimeter around �
the structure. `�`'
' 2. Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the vertical
and horizontaL continuity of the fuels a minimum of �
a 30 foot perimeter around a structure built on flat
qround. (For greater slopes ref. CSFS Safety Zone
chart. Page 13, Wildfire Guidelines For Rural ; s;�
Aomeowners) . � `
• 3. Spacing between clumps of brush and vegetation
within the 30 foot perimeters shall be a minimum of
, two times the height of the fuel. Maximum diameter
' � of the clumps shall be two times the height of the �`
� fuel. All measurements shall be from the edges of
; the crowns of the fuel. •
� \ � 4. All branches from trees and brush within the 30 foot <i
i perimeter shall be pruned to a height of 10 feet �;
; above the ground and removal of ladder fuels from
around trees and brush. �
' 5. Tree crown separation within the 30 foot perimeters �� .
shall have a minimum of 10 feet between the edges � � •
_ of the crowns. This does not apply to mature stands
of Aspen trees where the above recommendation for
removal of ladder fuels have been complied with. ��
In areas of aspen regeneration, the spacing
guidelines shall be followed. �; `;`
,.r .�r',=r
.;. r. :
:� I„=
.. g . j'.
. � . � . . - .. i�
r i
_._ � _ _-�..�._ yW _.,..�.., -- __-----------� �l�
, � . :�
�. as�
.. . . . � . ` � .n 4','•
. .. ' ' .. . . . . . ; .
.��.� "�� � ' _' . : .. .� .. . � , .� , � � t�� � J
1 .. 1 t, . . �•t,
.
�
. : �
, .-,- . . ., .. . •.. •
. . � ' .. �.: '..�, . . � ..
� .
� �_- .f�. . .. .
l •' � .
. .
_ ,-;'`_ : . '�
_� . . .
�J.,� ' _. - .
1�. ,
..
.
...
�. �:_, . d,C �!� ,���y'�,
i.�t���.«�{'k�� 3�*'�'+r�v.- �'��X� �� 'rl83��.���,i�.��'�c,�lrfs�slr�T,��F'�TlE�� . �r �iQ''�'�'��u�r�`i*d3!�,r
, . , ,�
. .-. . , ._ ..J:: Y%r ��z
�..
_ ,Y�
� �,'':
':� , y.
. ,. +�
'� a,: , :.
�$ 6. All branches which extend over the roof eaves shall ` �.
•;!'; be trimmed and all branches within 15 feet of the �;'��:. ,�
--�i chimneys shall be removed. " �
� �,:•� �'r..
� 7. The density of fuels within a 100 foot perimeter of �
� the structures shall be reduced where natural wY
� reduction has not already occurred. :'�. s`
r ,a r
S. All deadfall within the 100 foot perimeter shall be ��°
-- - removed. �*1•�.
�}` '�
9. The applicant shall be responsible for the continued `�+
. . � '�:�4�,;'.•
-- maintenance of the defensible space vegetation
requirements.
�":::a' ..
b. Structural Design and Construction Requirements: F::
:,i�;
1. Roofing: Roof construction shall be Class A, non- ° v �
combustible (no wood shake/shingles) material with ,��.-.
no flat roofs.
..�...:i . . . � . .
�
! 2. Vents: Vents shall be screened with corrosive �
-; resistant wire mesh with mesh 1/4 inch maximum. 4
: i
Ic. Maintenance:
1. Roofs and gutters shall be kept clear of debris. �
` I :�..
-,-� 2. Yards shall be kept clear of all litter, slash, and ,�
flammable debris.
�� 3. All flammable materials shall be stored on a
I parallel contour a minimum of 15 feet away from any
� structure.
�
a
4. Weeds and grasses within the 10 foot perimeter shall ;
�\ ; : be maintained to a height not more than 6 inches. ' •
� .-�
d. Miscellaneous: +
, 1. Firewood/wood piles shall be stacked on a parallel .��
contour a minimum of 15 feet away from the �!:
- structure. �
;;
' 2. Swimming pools shall be accessible to Fire k�� `�1'
_ I Department vehicles. ,
,
I 3. Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris.
� 4. Wood fences shall not connect to the structure. °"�
' �'a
� 5. Any outbuildings or additional structures shall ' " .' =
. . � . ''�o '
9
1 j r';.
��
-,.) �.
,
i":•
; �.. __ ---�,;,"�„ ..�s.,.....�-r--- -- -- - ---
,. •
`r
�
i . ;. �,
- - y } .�. ,`
-• � ��;_• .`
` s' y `j °,41
.. " . . � ..r. - . �
V ,=
` �:�t .
�I ��
� . _. ' i ". �(.�� � . . . I. •_•
> .
. . ���,��i ;�. ., .: • ..� . . . '..... , ..: _ _
� �'Y': , .. . . .. . . � � '� � � �.
'�5�1"°Y ' .. - . .
� r � . � . � � � . . . � � • - ..- .
�f.. . ... . .
'A�
� _�.�.� _ _..�..�. .�.m
,..�,.. ..- , . ,
_... _..:.....__._ , .. __. �,:,�„ k�„
. y � :�t}�i�t', yA:
— i.
*}.
' ��
��5 adhere to the same standards as structures. ���-'��
'� '...
4='-:
6. Fuel tanks shall be installed underqround with an -,:::.��'
approved container. �•
-... ,j . ,�_: - .
i �.y
r 7. Propane tanks shall be installed according to NFPA �t
v 48 standards and on a contour away from the ��
structure with standard defensible space vegetation r`{{ �
� mitigation around any above-ground tank. Any wood r';�:Y;,;
enclosure around the tank shall be constructed with �:.�''`•`� `
_ materials approved for 2 hour fire-resistive :_,.�. -;
construction on the exterior side of the walls. y:;�,y�;.. '
�wt
1_ `'., : .
8. Each structure shall have a minimum of one 10 pound
ABC fire extinguisher. �',,:
.':4: �.
9. Addresses shall be clearly marked with 2 inch non-
combustible letters an�l shall be visible and Y�-
installed on a non-combustible post. �c
' e. Access: Access roads shall be built to County standards. :
!, :
,..�
i f. Water Supply: �
; 1. When access to a public or private pressurized water
system is not available or if it is necessary to
augment fire protection water systems, private ponds
may be used if approved by Pitkin County and the �
local fire protection district. �;��
- 2. Any fire department recommendation for individual '�•�
I structure water supply and storage shall be
. � accessible to fire department vehicle from the
exterior of the structure through a Fire Department
approved mechanism (such as a fire hydrant). The
. amount of storage capacity shall be determined by �`
the fire protection district with a minimum of 1000
gallon storage capacity per structure. � i '
�,. `` 3. Residential structures located within areas -r
� —i identified as containinq "C - Severe Hazard: Trees° ;;
or °X - Severe Hazard: Brush" wildfire hazard shall
i be required to install in-house sprinkler systems �k
which meet the standards of the local fire
, . , protection district and the Uniform Building Code. �
.' �
g. IItilities: Utility lines shall be buried within the
access drive.
4. The applicant shall execute an Avigation Easement with Pitkin
�.
County prior to the issuance of any building permits. =j;,�
;. :�::;
4 _
10 f�,; I`
?� !' -
:�.
. . "___��i�tiywYtr ' ' .f_ :.._...�.r...
ll
`��
, � , ._,.....�.�-.�_>.�.s..�:..,.vsam'�ar+...Yaw�.�..-...--- ___.-,_. �
�F 1
� . _ � r�yC-i
� . . , �-. - . � .. � . ���` y�.
.a
. ;
� '�
. -
l �°.
.1 .� . ,.. _. . . . . 'y -•,. , _ ...
. . .�. - . - .. . -� . .. . �'. .
- i � . �. . .. "..i r. . ,
- � ;� � ... . . . . 1 . . � . ... � � :' .
. . � _ - . � � ' �� .. .f _ "
. �: .. , . . ... . . . .... . : �...� � . . � . . , .
. ,,��� � . - . -. . . . . . . � � ' . . . .
1y�.
._. _ ���.�ti.�..
,
,r �, � �
d .:p;. � .. � 3`., S
_,da- �L.'�rk �.gA'f;"�kF. t-Y...r. , . .;.,. ».�,;..... . .w: . :: .. +�if e s u,'tiiiiCe'.bhts'�114��ra_ t -�-�s�f..Uli�:,:,`'�t' •S^�7��.;
. .. ° -. . __.. ..._ - j r.,r:.
tT '.
��
; `� �^q i
,:.,:�,`:�.�i4.;�
`' 5. An adequate supply of water must be documented for the :-7;�. �'��•
' property and the location of the well must be determined �#.� •r
�" before the septic germit can be issued. �Y",•:,:..,� �
i �
:A �.�,•�f�:_..
6. A septic permit must be applied for and issued by the , yz,,
.� �+ .. .
;; Environmental Health Department before the building permits � �-�-'
ti{'-
•j can be issued. �-•`-.
. � . L�` �. � t.�
�N.�:... '
� 7. A fireplace/woodstave permit must be applied for and issued � x.:.r
-. < before the building permits can be issued. � �
.._�-�--� i r ::
8. All material representations made by the applicants in the �s �~;
application and public meeting shall be adhered to and `�'��=�.
considered conditions of approval, unless amended by other
. . .�L:..4• "
conditions.
`.4
9. The applicant shall file a 1041 Hazard Review Map for review ;,�1
by the Community Development Department and the County
Engineer for approval by the Board of county Commissioners, �" " `
� prior to submission of any bui].ding permits on the property. „
The following 1041 Hazard Review Warning and Disclaimer shall •:��d�`
be included on the site plan: r
,.�s�
"Applicant acknowledges that he/she has been informed by
. Pitkin County of the existence of i041 environmental
hazard areas that might affect the property, any ;;
improvements, and the use and occupancy thereof."
10. To mitigate scenic impacts, the applicant shall comply with �,•+�
the following conditions: .�-.
_ 1. There shall be no vegetation removed outside of the
� buiZding enveZope, except for the access driveway and as
approved.by the Planning Department for wildfire hazard
- reduction (as recommended by the Pitkin County Sheriff). +-3,
i
i 2. All utilities shall be placed within the access drive. ,
� IItility cuts on the northeast hillside are prohibited. '` `
'�_ - �
, 3. The maximum building height shall match the elevations
as depicted on the attached site plan. i�
_._ 4. The home shall have a 25 foot setback from the northeast ' '�
� 1 building.
' � .
' 5. No structures other than the main residence as depicted ` �
! on the attached site plan are approved at this time.
Additional structures may require further review.
'�.. .
7. The applicant shall use exterior materials that blend :,,
with the surrounding natural landscape. A sample of the ��
materials to be used shall be submitted to the Planning ...' ,, ���
.. �I
11
�:
�� . i . � � � . 'i
,---- --- .._--_.._.._..w_..--.- �;�'tt
r— - ----._.o..�........_. – ---�....�. �r
r ����} �
_ �`' '
. . � ',.
. �,• �
; ,.
; �l �
. - -
. , .
:
, . .
; .
_
1 1 - , .j �� ' ,
;� ' r
;�� : .
. . ,�
,r - .
:r�'
�
. �° � ��� lrirYw+rz.wo ,'l� "� ,.: _u. �9 ' :Ya� _„P�mY1� '�t
,�a
i� :
'C�/
`� . . . . .. � .. � . . . . .'� ,.
Office for approval prior to issuance of a building s_: r���
L1 permit. Non-reflective roof materials shall be used. �
,;
. . ,::r.,�`3_.
. � . . .. . . . . � ,�.l..
- 8. The applicant shall comply with all material ''' i.rj
representations made during the review of this project. �� i
� s.
r�,� i
,f
Attachments =�,
_
_ ��, ;,:
1. Land Use Application �:s'�
2. Referral Comments �,'�
3. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of April ,. ,
18r. 1995. , 1:� �
ri.
:�'
. . . . . : ..V.
..
i �._ . _ .. ;�.
Y- :
1h�' kj
')..
�.
.
, ::, - :' . . , �_
7:, ':'. ' . ..', . .. : -'�� . . , .,. .'.
:,':.p, . � ..: . ':: -. ' _ . ::.. . - ,
�
�.- '.:
= I '
_ I
\'' .
�J
� '1 �'
��
� - r �
, - - ,
,.;
i ,
_ ��
' � �,;
��'�� �+
�� . .. • i� .,'�1.-
12 ' �� I�� .
.� 4��
:. _
-� �.�,.
,�..
��4 " �",y � 4i+k''`xY'�,r Y.� �`. /.,.yiY 1 �,. Y 3:— a �""�„-�--�` '_'�y T'r` Y ... `'�`, ' x L� a
� '4 ` x �„rr��R� i�) ��" 7��t � ..y� �. � ; � z !�.' .�>`� -,r F i� C Fi .-
��:� � ���t�d'..�����.y�� .:� .�X ;� h �t��'Y-_t L�.�,r r; �� �, 1�A c i ' �'� �
� � s ����e��w.� ,t� i � t rty }E`�
T" �y��°4vA ���,�, � k� �f ; ._� ja � 1 i� i f -+ �SF �__A� + 4 ta� � .
� .M�L SY�� fi'x.+a �'��} , �<r fi:r+ '' 1 � �P��+, ;E �> ti� -� � c �- �'�` gl� s � F.i d7-,
rc a�.iq �k��x�'��`�.'L..�:y F ��r _ 1 � � � � 'S� � ,.M ..� w r e���"y�y i ^.��..
�� �� �' ��v Y x'Y � m Y" -� 4 f � -T J� l � j' < < � t M .
i � Ih �� x-f51 �h} x d iT�!�� i : .: F� . .
�1 1 ���,���'�-"' � _ .� 4,�'� t � , , r , ,� £� l �, , n r
` +{yt�{a't'���a,��u.'�'3}'�#� � �i K ja r ;r � f � ti
�.�ni � -� C � k A� � ,? M s 1 j H� i .
' �L�j����' H�'Ir�i �+"x„�s "F• ��'� -�� k �$ 5'� � � � � � '�''.�
r7� } n ,. cx R r�. � t.� �� -� t t
Tc� , �-3',� , � F '' y +,>. .�r.-,: �,, ' t ' � -
� �.,�c� � '..a—t =�a,s �C.��, � �
,- "��` °� � r �` y r �
y���+' ; t 2�' i . . .
.. ='LR,. . '.�, .
. ..w+,. . . . • . � , .
.�. . < � _.__..._..,..,..._._.. _,...._._.�
,� , y , ,
�
- A. .n . .a...�,..w..�.- �' �'� .�:.....,_ .�...e.......:....,.......�.... _..__..._ .�. . . � ..C.�. " ''_°-- �
' ' ���
:.�;' � .. . . � . . � . � . . . � •. �• . • y .
J�, ' MAY�—7 '
� — t;�
s ,; ..
. . . �. � . � iS r�,.
i•., .
b_
— � ,�• '�S ' ,,.f; � i+,
� - . . � � . � - . � . - � �� yyC
. . �- - . . . .. . . �#
S'.
d.t,��„ �'
:SNOW—AVALANCHE HAZARD EVALUATiON ���
• �
AND MR'iGATION ANALYSiS �� �.:
''��..�
-_ PEARL MILL SiTE, CASTLE CAEEK ` '
yt t_
. .�. . �,::�.. ;..
. . - �. �..'�. .
' (WILCOX PROPER'1'1� ;� ;
,: ' ;: <�•;
,. ;�,: .
�
i— '� ,.N
'.:�
_ ; ,. ; „
: , ,' . t _ -
,�
;:, i Prepared For
, :,a
_::,,� Mr. John Wilcox
�
: ,
,:; . ,
� . .::,,;.
�
, ..
,.�: ,
!�
Prepared by . ��
- - Arthur I. Mears, P.E. Inc. :r l
Gunnison, Colarado °;
May, 1992 , J . _
Ni:s
i w:
.�
i `��- ��
� � �� ��.�
�t 4�
t
�� �- — : r . �, a �'
� t .��
� � M-R 7�t f 'Y t 't s � ��� as
� :.` .h3u` 4 Tg9 i 1 t t. S : 1 �rtNY
� � ,�t� � �,y k r AS . ;S ' ! h � �
:' � ,.`y�l���`z}�.f �� +k��..R 3 :�,Sr j i" � '�y ' � �y'� _
� � 2} t ��"1�k 1 �: � � ��:. �f Y 1 ���.f .
j . , j �,7�rxg'�`r J�.k.��r J'�; 4 t - ;iy � ! �, s
sx�Y.ua �. �. . a .h� � -7 .
1 S 5.�!�� �'x.i.'�# � 3 .� y'r t `- " ,,;.n� �' � * �
y .�F 3 3 1 {ii} i
� .' t}G'�k.�g,Y�S{ ks� ?it i h . �! � :+If � � i �.
� � „��a�,�w � .F , `., ;ti,
� ' r i� .
�, ,. . .
^u�,��Z h�. , .
r �
x d'l*�( `�u . t w ,.} R :*c � �i,. �.�' .
7ti:: �� �' 3,�f-c ;'� 4���. - V I
t 4 i'� S �tt, i: . .
. .rr. t vt: -`�yd E _
..��f'L: 4 � , . -
Ly� � { � `•
,'�e� .. . . � � . . �
. � . . . . . .. ' � ' . . _ .� - � . . . • . .� . . . � �. .. _ ..
. , ` � � ' . . . . . � " . . ' � '
�yg.. ' �
____ __�
. �.r,..`'-.. _..�: �vmv�•. ti x.�., . .
: :: , .
.�, ...__.. , ,_ ,,..�R-_
..�.._� _,..�._......,._.____...�._.-— r,.,�,.. �',
' '=�:x� 'x�.
. r.... �
�� •
. �,��St.,�
: ��.`
;;; 1 OBJECTiVES AND i.1MiTATiONS ;��.r "
�� ..,-�,.
As discussed with Jahn wicox and Glenn Ham durirtg my site visit on Apri120,this report �';,�,�'a,:y
� has ttte following objeciives. s . �;
�,_.
� a. Mapping or avalanc�e paihs during 'design-magnitude" (100-Year �Y'::::� r
__ retum period) conditlons: . '.r- ;
� b. Quantficatian ot the avalancl�e loading crrteria at the buiiding site; `�. .
�.
c. Desraiptton and discussian of the avalanci�e hazard to persons in tfie
vicinity of the building site; and "
a_
d. Quantificatia� ot the avalanc�e hazard on the access route to the `f
- ' proposed Wilcnx buitding locauon an the'P�ari Milt Site." �:
} :
This reoort also has the �oifowirg limitations which snaufd be undersaad by all �ase
using the results: �
}
� a Snow avaianc�es oc�ur suddenfy and cannoi afways be oredic;ed,even
hy snaw and avalar,c�e soeciallsts;
b. There exists some smail probability that avaianc�es may exiend even �
beyond the limits mapoed in Figure 1; ��"
c. There can be no guarantee that the persans living in or using:he Wilcox �
property wiil not be within an ava(anche path wnen an avaianc^e oc::urs; F
and �
d. Because of faciors 'a." "b," and °c,° there is some small (6ut nnite)
� avaiart�e hazard or ris�c associaied with the use of this properry. ,
1 ;I fo�
� ' 2 TERRAIN AND AVAL4NCHE CHAR.4CTERlSTICS (
;
-- . Avalancite paihs affec�ng the Ashcror� area of Casife Creek drainage are shown an ' ?
� Fgure 1,whicn maps the exteni of avatanches durfng design-magrrrtude,or"100-year" ;
retum-period conditlons. Des�gn-magnitude avalanches must be considered in design
and constructian ofi structures and expasure of public facilittes that will cancentrate human � `
aciivity. Fgure 1 maps avalancfie extents which wit(he reached oniy during optimum i
dry-snaw/powder avalanche candiiivns. Typically,avalanches will be much smailer than
those shawn, even during periods af high snowfatl irttensity and widespread avalanche !
2CI1VIf)l. . ( ��;�i,:
. � . � � '!�°�;'i
. . . .. t . .! .
Paths"C,' "D," and "!" crass the access route to the Wilcox building site; path "D" may �''.
produce powder-btast and light flowing debris impact with the building during exireme ,.`,
i:;
• /� - �:. ..._.� -- -- _�--_ ._---: ?_ ..._ .� __-� .W ... ..�__ ._ ----, � qi
" - .. � ��� ��
1 � y _ �� •
..%... �;�
� I . ,
r,
� :�;.., .' , ,.. . . � . . . �.�. . . � ' � .'�. .i ..;� '-.:'�. . � . � � . � - � � � •
. . . . . � �. . ...�- . � . . . �
. ... -.— ._,.- .- . ..- ,. . .a _,,.�. - � . . . . . . .
.
�
�; _
{�ff�;.� . ' :: _ _ , .
:,.�.. � . � -
,� ,
. r�+6h-i n.Y`�h-m:tiiiN..?�.it... . S'9.+;c1��.. .. ,rw. . :,x�... ,. '.v ��� . . :w'vl.:`i`d..�..LtrZs::'.:,:.s�lt.,..��:t�?'i.'471+.ti.r<���:,�ra�.3ei..t.::.a,T+Wna l�;x$'kr,
�t .���.-. .�,�_L:•r-- - -��� . �� . ...-�� ._ � � �
•�`..`—� � � _- ,;-..�' .�;' ytJ ���•' ' -� : `. __�._._ �. T ; �
���;'I�"rerte°�;� � .v:. .% -���6M.r = - , �
� --_-�__ � -��: „?,., .•,,g• u„y.:%�� "t �-o-rf� �.• }�
,-` \�••'• .�' ` �'`\ � r_ . ' .
`-�.� //.',q,;'
, � ;> ,
i\,� -' ��_\� 111 , �It l• �1 "7 ''= ` _ '�'l' r�� i
�y •—_"`.�"�� � r�!'�'/,�%`�Ii `!t ��'i� '`' ,e ��? �'SS�t,
-'_' � '� � l :���//���'J'�wi��I_w :':'.. �` _-P\ •...
�-' '._�r/'w.. � \ l�.;j�, .. - \ �:csmw:oun�• � . : ,
. '} . I ,,= j .,� ��.�j�� . : ir,i,
�t�.-/��?6,/''f� �.'.:r,,��a—M'� �J ' +�--• � ,� l f � �� a� ��;'.
^�, � . ,�� ( i1���,�c;��j , .;��a,,;�; ; �-, t \. l = " :�._ � ��
� } �� ��,r.l.' �. -��,.. � � �_ :.
;�� _ , ,,;` .�:.,.�,���� a , �� ti..,,; � r (�.. ., _ i
'� �,''% � , ��-='�,,�l ' f �j� ,',^^:.�;< ; , r � �__� s
- \ /,�. , �.//' i _ . ��',, '•- • � � .— .r
7.��� � �3�..� �j i;i/ �r. . ^�J.i�Ji! �,`t; ;I � . ��_ �- _
''ti f� - ��"E,,� �.�'F�. : •:� � ��%�� .�I 'g / ., `.ti `, � 7
_ t� �� .;�, � .,;.�;�.:,,��.�.,. ,r�v.�.:,,),.-.. .,.: .�. �. � .� =_ _ ��..
' � �s�:'�� '�� ry ��,�� � H .'.( il�l. �\`�..:� � � � � �e �� y..
� '. ' 'd� '�� �l`„\ :d,' ` �' ' ..'Sjlf� � �\ � •�a.J� ne�. M� I
6�=�` � `�r' )�``:%'�� , ;�•• ' `<r s.r �('�;y;,`� ?S' I;{i.:(-. r-c-,
f_ �'� �i� � . �:��.-�f :;C:' . ,��+,� ,-� . :,� �' c 1 ;�., �
����J. 1� ���';' �P+'!� /" ��;� r�g . .``:\,� ��:`�\�\ _..: \`� t: .
�i ����i,:���t.� . `-�•�� t�.°�` •r\\L�� ra��' '�N �� `�, tt
,r:�':� : _-�- -��. _ _ �f'� , �w � . - - `
.. �/ / �° a����� - -, '��.)!.'I•'C'.7.;:.,�;�.)--;\u�:�: � ~�,-y�- 19
i��;aY / .!� 't �'� - =.� '•'l..:.:•',./ / � \a�. ^��� \ \ ` �`:\ i ,
� , ^�� �.'...r.��-_� V �I 1 ��@�" _�'t�- . \' � ��''��_� .� i
�iF_���Jy�. �.� \�, \���. - ' �� �� I � ��\�.��'��;°a.�':~•� ` ry�/ i .
_ ;- :�,�-= =� ..::,.� c, r.: . (` - -
� : �;.;=�-�~- _ . - ,.;� ,j:. ., l; N, ,.�;�'�:.. �=- �
�; --�y��� � � - �= - �.; ��: �'` ��� �� �'°=�_ �
�� - �- � �� . � , , �j�; -�:��:- ::�� ��
'�� ,���F"�-� �. / ��:��_„� v � , a�, , i i� � � I „�`--•,� , �.
•\ , � •��,�'�°�°�'' �� `p
•-�=%i - — 1�}::1 �� r) ::5, � ` j :��/-�- -�\ - '' �
;1'`==��%..^.� _ _ _ „ , t , '� ' -:�=. �� � �: .
" � � ': � ; , ` \ � ' . �:.'s :-�� � .
,='�y ,,�J�^ � -`�; ` . r '� ! �� .�- �'`'•ii;.; �• ' �� -3 � .�'�,�,��;�._ `
' r��/' '' �i � .���!::/.,,!� ;, � "'/, � l '� - - �
� �.�?� � c�E � �\�� _`
� ��� ' _, `�_ ,' � ; ', i :�,\�,.. �'/�<: �':;�r �� ;.
_ ��bC'.,i•�7L:'`= �r 1 '!� /: 'n � �' �� i ` �, �. .`�� 'r,�snN:,���, ,!'�� �.
�z" �� •; ' - � a ��=� - � j
�'�''"• ��- J :j '� �,j. _ _ ' �� f , � i
��;,/,nv.v ��. '�...� �i � �_ �i �,.�' � ' i
��7 '.�� Y� . -: i�.� �I. �� ! /���, ; ��� / :J I. ,�� /��� i'� � - �
� �� � � /,. , ''�� j I. / . ' �, '�. i. '' i �' r
/ t
�r.• ���� � ��"�.�'�'`+'_ i _, i f:.. �' . •\ �' ��' �1 ; 'ror�1. � '�'Sl:�/.��7% !� �
,� ` �� � � � ;::. 1 / / :`,' _ o° ;�
a,' ./� �+F 4, � /.? � � � '6� ��. � \ t \ \. � Oi'.�'C•�.� :.I: " � .
� 'R
�,�_ \ %r :`• /// � `, . �. '/, �
� E s=1��:,.-,��� "i -�,1.� 1�.,� '�" I ':(/-� . � E ���,:�,. � j �� .� I, .L�: . I�'I:
!'� ��, �j` �; '', � �.-.�� �� �`�_ .� . � �' 3. . _.=:-Y. �
. . .. �,/��'�/' '�. �_�,,` �� '..� ',1.i� .�`� \ I�, \ � ..j._ • �' .
\� r
�' �s�,�-- ; /� '�� , ��il�i:.�._ v �r
�• 'ii �� , .i'.^' •.a o�i� . J . , r l': � `\ �.+.J . . �
��y�-__-, `�1'/:
�: �,� . � _ �. C.. . ':G�_��. �" � A\ %!. -
.•���
��°�� i, y�,� FlG�RE t. Avalancne path extents during design-magnitude _ �`��_ l\� �:y;.
�''i,/-:'-�.: - �
("100-year') avalanche conditlons near the Wiicox building - = �1 '�
' /G��� s i t e. P a t h s'C,""D,"a n d"H"a f f e c t the a c c ess ro u t e;pa t h"p" _i��� \�'-' �
';�•—,�'
�•.;� reaches the huiiding sfte during eutreme conditions. -� •� �-
��L:.--"= Numerous other avalanche paths atso occur within the ` � _�- � �??;
-'��� ' m ed are but are not directl related ta the safety of this - �,' ' = 1,
.•�--� aPP a, Y �'' _ � -
.. ;.�. site. .�., . .;: L=`` I..
i°.. --- .�.�. ._.�.... _..---.—__---. scai�i:zacco. ..._�... _._.—_ ...i �ti�,_� >_i;� �:
.. . �.� 0 IMIL -�' �
��'! :.YO ] :xC 2000 ]00� +000 'A00 3a00 MM F-�i a'�1�:^ �� 1
� ��^.i��� J :iutDNEEd �'�=�'
� -... . _ . � _ - '_ . .
. . � � --_......._..._ .._:....w...... . _._ r-...-°---- �- _u._,.__......_. _ . ._.___._._,_ .
. - � . . . . . . . . . ._...� . .._�,
. / . - . .. � . . � . . � - � ��
� � ^ � _. �� � � - - . . . �� ' . ��
� � .. � � ` . . - . .. �. . . • � .__ . . -t ;
�. .' �_ .. . . � . .;. ` '. . . . .s-'.�'.
. � I .. .. � .. _ � . .. � . . - � - �� .. . . ' :
� . . . . ���- . - . . .
.
. . . . . .. � � ,_� . � . � , �
. � i� ' . . . ' � J
� _,_. . .�.... .___. _. .. '' ', . ...f.._.., . . . :. .
�, ' .. . . ' �.. . . . . - .... .. . . . - . � .
�� aw . . . . , . .. .
�.'7,,•
, `4 ,
���
.
�,. � _N
� h'��• � ���.sA.���ri'�'f..Tl�iFM,:L. R�: 8:'�n 'Nkt��.,: . .. . ... �w5i: �. �L.:.!'�.f'w�e�A:LRx'd7�'.:,�..5;�^_l`!`iA1G::+r.1��L..c...az_ae.a..«.�..... -�
�k�'_� A Fj�•'!
'fi`
f 1_'�
'9
� • F:"'���a
�..;•,
:,.
conditions as it s reads ta the south, passibl driven �•� �'
p y by a strong northwest wind. Other '`�" r;
:�t•;.� .
avalanche paths in tl�e immediate viciniiy are aiso shown. y�;:�.;��
i•., ;:...
��:` �y i•.t.
�,; RVqL4NCHE PATH5 "C"AND "D." These iwo paths converge and form ane large �� �L�-
? avalanche belaw the t Q,Odo-°aat elevation levei cavering approximately f,600 feet of the �i`� �` ��
� �. •;- _
� main(surnmer)road during extreme conditians. During the majar avalanches considered ,i�_.:°: ,
_._ 3 in deriving design-loading cnarac:eristics at�he proposed`Micax bui(ding site (Secrion �';4.:"::
€ 3j, dry-snow avalanches reacn the 9,800-faat level at more than 100 mpn. Fowing : = .
� debris wiil cross the vaiiey artd impaci the forest an the east side, and powder and air • �
� blasi�aill aifect an area approximateiy 2.J00 feet wide at the east side of the vafley. The ,:`-�:� '
� maximum extents oP avalanches in paths "C" and "D"were determined by •�'° `"
i
� a Historical recard of avalancnes, `V'�
b. Aeria(-photo irrterpretation; f' 1
Y
c. Statis�iical anzJysis oT avalanc�e teRain; and ,
d. Appiicarian or avaianc:,e-dynarnics equat�ans. a;,. . �
,�,
AVAL�IVCNE PATN "L" Path "1" stars 7om a smail, north-Pacirg stardrg zone at
_ 11,200-11,000 feet elevarion. During extreme avafanche conditions,this pach will reach :�s�
the vaile+�artd extend across porrtions or Cas�e Creek north oi�e huitding site. ft wi(t not
reac�the building and need noc be considered for design. •
�
. 3 DEStGiV—AVALANCt1E LOADING AT BUILDlNG
E,� .
i "s�
, .� The or000sed building sita (shown on Fgure 7}, is subjec:to light-9owin4 debns and
powder-�last`orces during desic�n-avalancne conditions. The flowing-avalanche debris
produc2s fmpact pressures �e powder blas: produces stagnatiort pressures. The
magnitude and duration of these forces on flat surraces oriertted normal to �e flow
i direcaon are given in Table 1. Additional detail, which may be useiul in engineered '
design,is provided in Fgures 2 and 3. These destgn-avalanche canditions nave a retum �
3_ ; period of approximately 140-years, or a constant annua! prooat�iiity of 1aa. •
,-�
TABCG 1.'bDesign-avalanche conditions
' AVAL. IMPACl' F10W IMPACT ;
TYPE T1ME TFiICS<NESS PRESSURE • �
4.
i.�
Flawing 6.4 sec 2.6 ft 185 psf ;
� Pawder 10.7 sec Full Ht 60 psf
l.
; The avafanche-foading condifiens ouUined in Table 1 and prov�ded in additional detaii in {� -.'"
` ! Fgures 2 and 3 can be used in architecturel pianning and conceptua! desigrt. j,, ��_:
� �� Modincations to these loading parameters will result when the final orientations af , �I
! struc:ure surtaces are knowrt. The avalanche laads at the struc:ure will be moderate and �
+ easily accommodated in design. '' .;:.
t r;
E,
�., ::
' �
3 ;..
.. . 1 �" __ _.�. �-_..�.......... ..._...`.,.. .._,..._,. .— - � . —_-...�..__..�_,.._— '� 4. ��F� 'S��.
�
_ � . . . . ' . . . 'I 1
, . . �� . ' . . . ' . '_ . . �� .
� ;i . ... . . . . . . . . t:i .
• ' . �,� . ..
� . :
�: _ -. -- --" -� - - _ � �
�.� � . ,
,� ,,,.• .
� �� `t� ' .
,t. . . � ,
;�
`'�",. .:.. .�. . :..:. .- � .
_ _ t � r�""r„•
• ��
;;:z . . .
i:i
- '' FL4W THICKNESS ;y..,��;
j Ashcroft D,Wiicox Property ` .
� r '
3.5 ' � ..;'y3
a I
:� 3 I ;;:'.;+.
� I _,�
. . �.`w . u; _ . i;. ,
= y.
C Z' , ' r�`�' r
_ _ � I � . > =.
� :
� i s ; , �r�:.:.
� I �. :
� � �
I !
as' ' �
_ � I
7
o_.:'
�.5 d5.7 t7.3 5J.0 52l 54.2 so'.4 58.5 v0.7 628 �
,—ime binea Avalancne start(Sec) ;
FtCURE Z Fiowing avalanche thiC,cness distribution as a ' �
functian of tlme sin�s start of avaiancne. Time iniervals 3,4,
and 5,(47.8-�4.2 seconds)were used to compute ave2ge
flow thicicness in Tabfe t.
IMPACT PRESSURE
Ashc:o�D,Wilcox Property
. aso i �
aoo,
� � _
a �� �
� ; soo -- �!:
�.., , m .
._ , � a zaa� ' , �
U I �
a 150I .I
, ; E '� t
; SOI �-.!� I k
� I '�' . ,• ` �1��� � . . . .. .
. ., � � Q " • . . _
aa,s as.7 s�.a so.o"s2� 54.2 Sa4 58.5 oCJ 628
: Trtme Since Avalancna StaR(Sec) . �
� :
� FlGURE 3. Impact pressure distribution through time. T1me � �='
irrtervais 3,4,and�were used to compute average pressute. �
This illustrates the time scale over which pressure changes. � �,
4 � '
- ---,--�-�:.��.�..._.._- ---� --...�_ _._ - - — — - ----�.�,s����
. / . . . :�"'__ - . . . . . . � . . . yfi
� . . ' . � .': . � �� F�.
)
. � .. � . • �i i
�.
� !
. � 4
� . ' r
�, , '.� .:. �. .� .r. . 1. '-. � ..
. , . :.. ._ -.
. . . . ; • . . . . ' . .
� � 1� � . . - . � � .. . ' .
. �1 1 . . . � . � .t r . .-. . .
. . . . . . . � . . . . .. ,
. . : . � � �. _ _ :i. �� ..- .� � . � . � . .� .. _ .. " ' . .
�� �; .� . . . . � .. . '. . � . .. � - '
f�_ �
y�. , ... . . .- . . . . ' . . . . ,. . . � .
Y
`�
� . , �V'
�
' .�':�.'1�1.J� r ..�'�M�?e.;�:,.�.l�A;yu;s��:,r dS'�....,'�ilr... .... ...a.:,,".�t�. o._,...._,.�r��;`1!�:simv,�+^�1.,'y1r,'�;k..!Y:��tt���..s��"`;��,+r`..,,,.,,
s;.�s
�_=
� .— , �;.
. ` � . ��,
.�'`-''..:�.
F','.
The follawing additlonal points should he cartsidered during the fina{--design process. �tf:.-;,
' < '`a
', a Windows or ather large glass areas should be buift abcve the flowing_ } �, •'••
S y.,
;; impact height This impac: height may differ from the flow thicicness
� indicated in Fgure 2, and must be determined in finai design; and j4F � y
f ,r.
. b. Windows and ather large glass areas should be designed far the � . .
--- moderate stag�ation pressures specified in Table 1. =i•
:?:�.`;;�-:
�::;:�.�.:.
;:�;:
4 AVALANCHE HAZARD NE4R BUILDING SiTE
:;'.;:;�.
Avalartche haTard irt the immediate vicinity of�e proposed buiiding site is negligible. �:i°'
' I Fiowing avalancne debris may reac:� the northem part of the property�retum periads -' '�7
: � af anoroximately 100 years. T'nererora,there may be a period less�an 2fl secands lang -
' -i during a 1•o0 year period wnen a major avatanc:�e arfec�the tand immediate(y nortft of '"�
` i the building(and touches the�uitding). This means ootenfially dangerous avalanc^.es at ��''
' the site occur 6.34 x 10'9 (six millionrh of one percer� of the total time. `
i41
- j Suc� a small probability o�being exoosed at the building siie creates a hazara �tat fs
� much smaller�han that routineiy accapted dunng many of our regutar acsvities, �
�
y
i
5 AVAL4NCHE HAZP,RD ON THE ACCESS ROUTE ,��
• i The acc2ss rnute between Ashcrort and the praposed buifding site is crossed by
avalanche paths "C," "D," and 'i" (Fgure 1). Avatanccte freqe:enc�, rather than design
laading characteristics ;s impor.ant in determining nazard on�e ac�ess route. This is �
�ue because small avalanches can be as hazardous as large ones that s�vesp ac;oss the �
entire vdley.
,. .
-�:= --,' Avalanc:�e frequency has been detertnined in the foilowing way:
� �
a My persanal experience with avalartche terrain artd avalartche frequene�
3;
' in Calorada; �_
- .t ,
, � b. Vegetative indicatars: and '� '
lc. Interview with Mr.Daug Bitterman who has been a residertt of this area '
� far mare than 10 years and has observed and documented numerous ���
avalanche occurrences.
-,� iY''•
� ' -''
� .
� �,
;��
� 1 ''''
� � . . . Jr . . . I
.� . __.... �
. i�. - - — -— ' -- - — - �$�
iY
� . .. . .. . - . . ... '��. . ' 4':
. � .. _ ._ . ....' t_�r ' .;
, (. �
� - S
. .. _ . . _ .,,'"• . . .
\ ys,�-��`,
� + , : � .
� � � - ._ ;r _ � � . . � . .� � . � � . � .l.
' . ,�: � � . � .. . � � . .... �� .. .. . .' .
t��.� • • . .
� �f. � ' . . . ' .
�� ,
� ��...��:,.s�(.�����c.`�� ��t`��-i��sa. .�.+ �`1-f. . .. . .. :t�..."�-. .�a`+e�„r,.''�:�.�f.S�i'�c• �C'#���ri�"st�i',eiF.�c+�5 "�'im o t��-.. ,� .r.
rcw�S+wa�+oi`_�.Y�ki�'
1 .
�.�,:jS..
• • ta
' '1
�� �Sj
As a result of my irnestigation, the fallowing is conc}uded about avalanche frequency. ' .
:ti i r
=a a Avalanche paths"C and"D" reach and bury the main road (west side :_�.
•�'� af vailey) at resum periods of approximately 5-t0 years. !`='-
+.,.
6. The typicat length of noad covered by paths"C'and"D" (retum period �
10 years), is approximately 1,30o feet This may resuit from severa! � . `
avaianches at differe�t times. �`
. _ �':-'
r:: --::
c. The altemafe access r'oute (on the east side of the vailey)was coverec: ��'�`
^a:r.
_ with light debris and smaii tree limbs (resulting�om a major avalanc.'�e in j�,.;-:�.
paths°C"and"D"during Marcn,1991). This avalanche has a retum periad
of rough(y 30 years. Trte route required a full day of effort to ooen.
Aoproximately 300-Sa0 `est was covered. �
d Path "H" has not besn nbserved to re�ch the altemate acczss route. �.;.-;
, Based on terrain anaiysis, we assume thai anoroximaiely 100 feet or�e ;.
i route wiii be b(ocfced by�is avalancne path once every 30 years. �
'I ;
" i
The hazard to thos2 on the access route can be quantined by computing a hazard index �
(HI)thai cansiders the Te4uenc� and width ot avaianc�es on the east ana�Nest acc8ss �
� rnutes and �e number ot times per day oeople may travel from and to the Wifcax
residenca. Tne quantification method is identicai ta thai usecf in calculation ot avalanche
I haz3rd ort mountain highways. Tne results of�e hazard index calculation is summarized �
in Table 2.
I �
TABLE 2. Hazard Index on Access route '
� .
� LQCATION j HAZARD 1NDDC i
, � West Access Route Q.3053 !
� -� -- - East Access Route I 0.0251
--.
The calculations summarized in Tab(e Z assume travei on bath routes is done without
consideratlan of wea#t�er or avalanche conditions. Clearfy,if ttavef is done at�mes whert
� tite hazard is"high"or°extreme' itte hazard irtdex wauld be higher. Similarty,if travel is '
done during Umes of"1ow" or"maderate" hazard,the�iatues wouid he(ess. The hazard � .
index is usefui to compare hazard an the acc�ss routes with hignways and other routes �'
exposed to avalanches,
Aithough the hazard index is roughly 12 tlmes larger an me west route than on the east
route,both are very small. For exampte,the Britisn Columbia Avaianche Task Force has
+��• ranked the hazard on several Canadian highways and recommends mitigauon (or na ':�:;�
miCgation) as shown in Tabie 3. !.j '
� ,I.
,�
. : .� .. 6 f���.:
'_ , ',:. . �,
. , � . ----...+...,.,�.�,,.�_,,,,_._. - .. — -. � ----°-` . - - .- .
'_' ^��
. . . , . . . -- . . .. '. TnlJt
. . �� . . � . . � . . . . .� �`:.:, �,.
- � . . , - . � .. . � . � � . . ,1 ?
. . ��� ' , , `: ,.. � .� - �'. �� ' A
� � . . � . .. � ' . . �� � . � .. ..
�� i� � .. . . . ,� - � r�.r` : � � .
..: . � ... _ . _ , . � . . t. . � . - �. . .. . . . :�.
. - — . � _ ,_. ... .. ..._ i._ . ' . � . . . . . � .. : . {. _ .
�: � � � . . . . ..._- . .. � . .. � ..
r�'��� _ ' .
,,�. ' ,
i�
_..,� _ �.o..�.��.�.��
�__. __ .
_ _ ...__ ,.�„
.d�� l• . ... .a�L'ki' ...W.'21� . c. .. . ,,n .. . � ... . . . t . . . •i..�iv.....�....�n,.a+r.....�r.w.,..u.._.,�...�....y._..� ���,���'
(
� � t
i • • ` ,{.
�.. ,�t�
';' TABi.E 3. Hazard Aanking a�d Mi�gation �'
�; (Canadian Htghways) °
_ � •'�'
� •-
HAZARO HAZ4RD INDDC MITiGATiON .•'.�y'"
Very Low < 1 Nane required � .'
r
a low 1 to 1 Q Waming/ h�i''�:=
_ clasure �. .,r `.
,�,; `
MOderate 1Q to 100 CamroU r�.;:.
- - C�OSUf2 ���:�
High >100 I Full Curtvol
i The small hazard index rankings in Table 2 clear'ry piace the access route to the Wiicox � ..^
- praperry in a"very law" hazard category. The indushy standacd in highway avalanche
control suggests that no ac�on is ne�essary because�e hazard is sa low.
6 CONCLllSIONS AND RECOMMENDATiONS �
i
: The analysis af avatanche c�arac:eristics and frequency preserrted in this reoott enat�les :
the foltawing condusians: �
a. The praposed building, hecause it lies at the southem finge af an �
. ;: i avalanche pa� with a retum periad of roughly i00 years is sr�bject to �
moderate avalanche farces which can easily be incorporated into design.
� b. The avalanche exposure af persans near(but outside) the building and
� an the acc�.ss route is minimat and is substantially less than other hazards �
� we normaity accept in our ac5vi�es. �: .
�_ � .
,�, I recommend the fallowing response to hazard be used at tt�is location: � . _
F
a Design and build the sm�ciure to design-avalanche loads specfied; ; �
j
� � b. Avaid the west access�ute during both"high"and"extreme°avalanche � . ;
hazard; avoid the east access route during°extreme" hazard periads. ? ��',
_ �•,.
Report submitted by, f .
;
! ;,,
Arthur I. Mears, P.E � �;':
i ;r,�I
� Avalanche-control engineer j =
1
� ,�.
�,�.
;i�`.
I 7
— -�..,.�»---------�-- --- ---�i
� �
� F
` x �
. �. . ` ' . ��
-. ;�
- f .. �t ;
` ,, '`� _ ":�`
, . . :: . . .
� . . . �; : .
i - f
'� ; 'j ` ,"
, � . ,
" ; - .; : « �
- - .. :� -- r •
.,-.._ . _ ;
,
� '
f�y�, , - � ,
,�.: • , � �
.�''
.�;>, ' ,� � �
.r .ao.. ...,a.....�. .. .. _ . as:rlc�a.�L.�:. ..%y.�-^�Ch-. it'J�.}t.:.Ya:r-�y,j.4il.;'htk.,3' +"*
".. . . Y..� - ...... . .:-. .. • .
'T E 'Uy�l,i
� ... ..... . . ...... . ' ...��..�.r'. 's.����.�.' ..
' '. . ..."' '. _ . ". _.. ... ._ ' �_ —' .i� Y.yr,;�.
yT,�,. }
i , �.
! p / x
s . ' D���`� �. 71M.�41
����'
MEM�RANDIIM
i�`.:
'" TO:. Board of County Commissioners . >..Cr�;,��
�; Regular Meeting - August 9, 1995 �,:•�°
���',,
� FROM: Ellen Sassano, Planning Office ""� '
� ;'.-.
s
� TSItU: Suzanne Konchan, Community Development Direct s r
a
RE: W/J Ranch - Minor Plat Amendment
___ _ ,� ::
_.: ---��—�—�_�— ------- •'�w`'',: :
- --- :s;�..�;'
REQIIEST: Pursuant to Section 3-1808 of the Land Use Code, the
applicant requests approval of a Minor Plat Amendment. Minor Plat "
Amendments may be authorized by the Planning Director pursuant to `�
Section 4-4 of the Land Use Code. Pursuant to Section 4- .��
• 402(D) (2) (d) of the Code, the Planning Director may refer review
of such requests to the Board of County Commissioners. Given the _ `
� nature of the proposed plat revisions, the Planning Director defers
i to the Board in this review. R
+.
i t
• � APPLICANT: John D. Musick, Jr. W/J Ranch, Inc., represented by 4,
David Schoenberger, President of Aomeowner's Association
_ '
LOCATION: W/J Ranch, Woody Creek
BACRGROIIND: Pursuant to Resolution No. 94-200, the Board approved
a Subdivision Exemption for Fully Developed Lands to accommodate r� "
the conversion of 62 rental units at the w/J Ranch to sale units.
To date, only the first filing (of three) of the Exemption plat has
,;.� been recorded.
! DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAI�: The applicant proposes to amend the
' first, second and third filings of the W/J Ranch Subdivision :
I Exemption Plat to "reconfigure lots to make more desireable and i
efficient use of the subject property." To be more specific, the ,
applicant proposes to enlarge existing units by combining duplex �
y�: .� units into single-family dwellings and four-plex units into duplex
� --�- units. New lots and units have been added to the plat to account
for lots and units "lost" as a result of the combining and
I enlargement of existing units. Specifically, the following chanqes ,
_ i are proposed:
!
� i Existing Unit Proposed Unit -• �.'
Filina Lot 's Confic�uration Conversion Note
1 13 & 14 Duplex Single Family "Lost" unit to
be replaced on
new lot 13, Flg.2 •,:
c.:
Z 3o Duplex Single Family °Lost" unit to 'e `�='�
� � be replaced on �
inew lot 29, Flg.2 �`.
I Iy ��
i �i
<-f"-
. . , ._ ' .... —' _— , . ���t
/. tr..
... •
` '
, . • . �' * �
� . -'� `
_ . : � \
_ t, �
, . �..: '•. - -. �-;' .
�
;� t _ _ . .
, _ .
\ i ` /, : ' ;
, �: ,._
_ __ . _.._ -�- •
_
� � =a:�^.x7� � .. � � � �� . . � . . . .. _... . -� �. . . . . • .
;��['r; _ .
�' '
,� -
��
�;K , J , ^
�r"'. .� .' ,
� • •- :�rr...�t�ak":�,x��... �z�..,� ' _ _.... _.... ..._._.___.....----- -
- _ ,.. _... .,_ _. ....----. __.._� __._.._ �c�
. . � . rt.,�Pi,H,.��yf;�
� :� t,
. -,'0`, - �kp:
���,:� � . � . . . � - :'4...
y �.
; � . _ '� :���
:..� - . � � - �
-' 2 26 & 28 Four-plex Duplex Two "lost" units '�•� ����
;"
t,;,.l
_ to be replaced '#�- '= �
lr„--: ti,
-'�� on new lots 25 �:" : �
& 27, Flg.2� �-,,Y.',; .
i'� ..�t'��y:
� 2 22 & 24 Four-plex Duplex Two "lost" units j�'t "
to be replaced � i
� on new lots 21 '�- : r
,.,w , :.
_. & 23, Flg.2 J��': :=
3 6 & 7 Four Plex Duplex Two "losC° units "�*�'" �
�
to be replaced �,..;� "
on new lots 4 & '~��
'..,.,,
10, Flg.3
, 3 12 Duplex Single Family "Lost" unit to s`''
be replaced on ;`x�
new lot 11 Flg.2
- Lot numeration will also change to reElect reconfiguration. "��!
� The total number of lots and units approved by the Board pursuant �;
' to Resolution No. 95-200 will remain the same. ;is}
. STAFF COt�SENTS: ,
Pursuant to Section 3-1808 of the Land Use Code, a minor plat �
amendment may be approved if the amendment is found to cvmply with
` � the following criteria: t'�
• _� The amendment:
� - increases or does not affect the degree of compliance with
° , � Code standards;
' - is being made to a recorded plat which has been approved by ?
:.,� the County; and •
� < - is consistent with representations made during subdivision
(exemption} reviews.
- Staff recommends that the following issues be discussed at the '
meetinq to determine compliance with the preceding criteria: :
i
1. Affordability - The appZicant will provide more information 3-
at the meeting with respect to the type, cost and
I affordability of new housing which is proposed; and the
implications of increasing floor area and lot si2e on the �`
� affordability of existing units. A critical issue in review
' of the W/J application was the affordability of the units in � •�,,.
�' ! both the short and lonq term. � .�;:
i E�: ;a
l Z f
�� �`��
� _. --- __________ . � t '
, ,
_ . _---.�;,,w, �....�- --.--....._.�.---- _,
t..�.�." .
. . .
, � :
. . ,
_ �a
_���,
. , � ;
� �. � � �
, __
: . . .
. _ �.
. _ . ._
..��.� � .. - �.. ...,. .
. -� .� �: . � ..!^. _. i. : .
. , 11 � �.. . .. {���.' � - � . . .
. . . ' ...; .� :.���� � . . . . . ' �, '.. . �� � . ... :�... . '.�..
..-� . . �.-.; . � . ..;.: . . � '' . � . ' .�: �. . . -
. . .� .. .. . .
. .. . �.... . . . � ... . .. . .
_ :...� ..,�r_ . _�_... ._. -., [' - . �. - .. . -. : � � �
�..�
• " " _ '
: .. ,:� -._ ', �.
t�� . .. � _ .. i � � . .
_•�F- � � � � ,
�
'.r Y_%E' . '_ . r ^, .
...__u:.+«....��.�. ..._J..._ _ . .. . . . . - - '
.4{��'��,`r`,
''T'_
W.
`���: '•.';
�, :•;, .�4
Z. �nfrastracture - While there will be no net increase in the :��, '� �
numbar of units, the nwnber of bedrooms will increase as a ;�^�. -�
�':...a
result of this reconfiguration. This increase may have ,> >
- repercussions on the existing septic systems. Mr. Schoenberger �:�:',..'`_-•.
' indicates that Mr. Musick accepts the responsibility of making �? ` ��-
�' modifications as necessary to the water, sewage disposal, ��t'i-=" '
� electric and phone systems to accommodate the change in unit �`�' � 5:
�S�` r
;� size and configuration. Staff recommends that the `=> �
..:;�. ,
Environmental Health Department review and approve any { �•. �
---� � modifications to the water and sewage disposal systems prior � ��"
.:�:,_,.=:.
to final sale of the units in Filings 2 and 3. �l� .�;;,-:
_'i.Y. ",
_`y• _
3. Current Restrictions - Staff recoaunends that alI new y�.'�";.' -
construction comply with all restrictions placed on the =' "
;�:.3.�:�..:�•��.
. Subdivision Exemption approval with respect to height, floor ,, 4 ,
area and exterior design approved for existing structures.
. � New building envelopes and/or setbacks to accommodate the `iq
reconfiqured lots and units must be addressed by the applicant
: •ti
. � prior to recording of the amended plats. In the former
I approval, building envelopes were only necessary on those lots `�"
� :j which contained environmental hazards. Steep slopes were the !''�'
, I only hazard impacting lots. Those lots containing no hazards 1
+ were restricted by setbacks only. Resolution No. 95-200 is •'}
attached for.reference.
4. Visual Imnacts/Density -. Visual impacts of the project will `
increase. Though there is technically no increase in the
number of Iots and uriits, more land area wi12 be impacted by
residential development. This is not necessarily perceived �.�
as a problem, as Planning Staff typically encourages �,..•
i clustering of development in already developed areas. There
will however, be a loss of open space within the subdivided
area, and Staff recommends that the applicant verify that the
reconfigured Subdivision is still in compliance with open
- space requirements for the AH zone Distzict.
i
� 5. Amended Plats - If the Board approves the Plat Amendment � �
� j request, the applicant wil2 be required to record an amended }
-�--�I plat for Filing 1. Prior to recordinq, the Plats for Filings +
' 2 & 3 must be revised to zeflect amendments, as approved. '�
� �,
� In the event that the issue of a£fordability can be addressed to � •j;
- i the satisfaction of the Board, Staff believes that the remaining
issues can be resolved, and a finding of compliance with Land Use
' Code criteria can be made. ,�-•
' i
RECOMMENDATION ,
If issues of affordability are addressed to the satisfaction of the
Board, Staff recomraends approval of the request subject to the 'w
' following conditions: x"
; . ,'_s�s_,_:
c -'-t
. 3 +� '
i !i
t'i:
,.
�_.__ _._�..,�...�__.� ..�...�- _-- �
� �` --- -...._"-�;'�.`�'�Jr�Fi
• �� ,.
� ` � ,
� � ; • �' . - ,�, �
1 � � ' • :, �. , .
, ; .
�. . , .
,.. _ _. ..— ..-. ,,c__,_ .. .
�: . _
r�,�,� .
. M1n
�'
„,.�,
. :...
_:.... _ � �. �
--.:.__ . �, _. . . . ' .,-� w
_ . . :._ - _ : . ..---' --�._.. _s-• :_�... ,, -'--- '--�y - tY�='�� f�r.�J' �,",�
. .. . _. ......-�-- -- -•.;..,�+K*�� . _��is4Cu - - i�,�y,'
. ' � � =f., ��;
.:i:: . .� � . . � . .V:
j ;±i'�� � . . � � �� - ' .�. �' ��;
a� �'
I.+ . ,1'•� :
:! 1. Within three months of apgroval of the application, the ;#,� r .
�� applicant shall record an amended plat for Filing 1. �."J � `
i . �
- ,S� ��,�'�
. ,, 2. All elements of the amendment shall be subject to applicable 1 : y,
� conditions of Resolution No. 95-200. ,�
l.,e
3. Covenants shall be revised as necessary to reflect s�Y r
modifications to the Subdivision, includinq, but not limited � � a ,��
to utility modifications and agreements. �,-�__
-.-- � � ei' .
— 4. The Environmental Health Department shall review and approve �;:'�+"''_
an modifications to the water and sewa e dis osal s stems *�'.
Y 4 P Y ,�, ^
within the W/J Ranch Subdivision prior to final sale of the
' units in Filfngs 2 and 3.
.;�
5. New building envelopes and/or setbacks to accommodate the � `�
reconfigured lots and units shall be delineated on the amended
plats prior to recording. Development shall be limited to �� � '
slopes of 15� in grade, or less. `
.�V_
. � � � } �i!d'
6. Prior to recording of the amended plats, the applicant shall
provide documentation to the Planning office that the „•;-�
reconfigured subdivision parcels comply with open space and '
setback requirements for the AH zone District.
7. The applicant shall comply with all representations made in ';
the application and in public meetinqs.
';�.�
I
�s•
,.: .
�
' i
_.A:_:.; _
�
,_; ,
; _ :
, ,
� - ,
,
},.�,
. i �'
�"'=
� 4 {
c;; ^;
4 ,� i.'�
x
a �
��,., ,i
,� � _
�y 7t
— � T _ — �
� r� . ' �� ..e.
.
. ,� „ .: ' � .. - .
. . _. i ,�_. .. , .., :,'” . ,. �:- �..'.. � .� � J
;r y� .
j , �
} �� �,r �
�� $ i � � 4
' s ,.�-
�
i � � , - :i'7,t _
.
, , _ • ,
1 , . ,
1 �, }, r - -
, a .
, ,, _
. ,
: , .
,.. , . : • �
::: ; : ,: ,
. � � y• '�_ _ . . �
� � � � ' .. � � _ � � .' �.
,-,s ,
._ . „ � ._..�._ . �..`�,..✓.�,..�
`..�_2. ' � . . . . � � . , � ,. . .. ...... . . .. . .. . . . r'}l��'
:� L A Q/ . O E F I C E S • c] F �$,q�
JOHN D.M[JSIC�C,]R.6c ASSOCIATES � ,�
";� , I+ '
� y � � . AtiENQii�.E 4'_ :-
t
�O W D.IAUB[X.IR sul NWNqE AvEMIE.9taT!w0 10!90tlfh►aL lI11lET.SIAIE 10C
� �:��i� /.Q C07{'IOM -
. ��� AW��wGUrew.oaaueotw+�a gp�LOEA.CadMOUl�70'419 ,
A9lfl.COlqU100 ti��'t'N� ;r.j`.
ooa r.eiown..u� 0�1��m+� ���� ,;.J
� --�.._. �ormowmoMOO ��T080UlDOROR9CF - ...
Z�:
,ANN 4 NFiW�� �
LOSAIVd8.E10f*ICE
- nprnmwma��on 201Y fA�N1tY PANK FAlL 9UIE 1t00
70at
CQ
� 00!!Y IL CUWt . . LW ANOElE4.GY.Y�dMM 1 W� �:
. . nwnfm rcawm.aa�r. r#7c pto 3�-� -r�
��a+�� ,..,�;::-.
(M�LA BEHRO . . . � .
. _. �prn�owmo��00 . .
. _'_— "' . . . . . � . . . � � . . . ~.�. .
.. .. . . . . . . . �
. :.I .. , . .. .. . . �_ � . . . - � . . � �..
,L.:� .
� . ; � � � � ' ' ; '.
' w/J Ranch, inc., tAe ot�rnex of tlie Leal prcPertY Irnorm as the I
� ', Colorado, hereby a►uthorizes
� W�J ganch located in Pitkin County,
: � David H. schoenbesqer, Presideat ot ths gomeowners l�s�iation of �
[i/J Aanch, Inc., to act a6 its representat v� �o��$P�� ��� ;
application for a sinor plat amandman 1
subdivision. �
w/J �axcH, u�c. ��
; +.
� • � .
By' Jr., c dent
- � � J PlI1s1B�Cr .. .
� �.\ � �� . � �. . . � � � .
' � .'- . �. . . . . . . .. . . � .
� � � .� � . . � . � .. . . . :: i .. � �
. � . � . . . . . . . .� � � . . .� . . . � . ...,1
' � � . . . . .. . .. .. . . . . .. . , .. � . . . _ . . . . . � . ,`,�,.';
. . . . _ � . �.t
. . . . ' � . . � . " � . � . . . � . .. .. ��
�� - � . .� � . � . � . . . . .. � . ' ..�!,i .
, , �!� .
_ ,.� ,
-- - � —�-- — --,:.;, �
r
\ '�'i
: 1 �'• � e4��
H.
_ ,
1�� 4 I
_
� {
.,
.
.. _. . • � - ' , ' . ' " . .
..
�,��' .: � :�.. `._ � , ,f , ,' � 1
a �
. , :.a �' ; l; ..,
` 3 _i'� , k�
v -
1 _ '� t�(�• i .
.��1 ' '� - ',1��• .
- . . ., -. .. , . . .
. _ ,, ,_ .;- . . . �.:,.
, . ,.. , ��: � . �
...
.. ' .. . .... 4 N -,. .r �•.. _.. .��.��. �. ..�
�}
� . � S' i� - ' f . . .
`�� �- . . � . ' . � .'� .
� .� , . . .. � . .. . � � . .+� � , .. . . � • . . . � � -
• . . . . '� � , . ' , .
:...,.... , . .
.��
. , . r t�.•',.
t'•ti'•��v�.:
� � ; .k
� ��-�S �.
assrsoRarmuri ;�:�.�t'`;
1 '-.:.
,' TO: Soard of County Commissioners A � .,:
;� Regular Meeting - August 9, 1995 ` j.;�, .��'
�: � 1; ;'.•...
�,,.���' TffitU: Suzanne Fconchan, County Community Development Director �'�.�'z,y
�' C:.,..••
� „ FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Planning Office �- . :.f
. � Y
RE: Payne Minor Amendment to a Development Permit :.,,;�: ".,
,_;•�:..
' �.
_.._ _.
- �— —�—.=—��_"—�—___ -- zo� — --�, .�.�.
. . ,p�.+_ �-:
REQUE9T: The Applicant requests approvaZ of a minor amendment to ��"-'`�
,,� .
-� a development permi* to amend a condition of Boarct of County
Commissioners Resolution No. 94-12�. The Applicant proposes to
deed restrict Unit 1, Winfield Arms Condominiums in Aspen for a
� resale to a qualified resident under the Category 3 guidelines, ;�
znstead of providing a cash-in-lieu payment, equivalent to 1.0
Category 1 employee. Pursuant to Section 4-402(D) (3) , the '� `
Community Development Director has opted to forward this ;�
_ _� application to the Board Eor consideration.
�
APPLICANT; Thomas Payne �
_ , APPLICANT'S AEPRESENTATIYE: John Kelly
LOCATION: Parcel 2B, Happy Day Ranch, off of Emma Road.
ZONING/LOT 3IZE: The parcel is zoned AFR-10 and contains ;�
- -i approximately 36 acres.
_ SACICGROIIND: The Planning Commission qranted 1041 hazard review
approval to this parcel by Resolution No. PZ-41-47. The applicant
at that time proposed to provide cash-in-lieu for employee housing
. mitigation rather than an on-site unit in order to preserve the
i property�s agricultural and scenic resources by limiting �
! development on the site.
,�. _ � Resolution No. 94-127 granted an extension of the vesting period
--' �_' for the oriqinal 1041 hazard review approval for the property and
replaced Resolution No. PZ-91-47. Condition No. 19 of Resolution
94-127 states: '
, . "At building permit application, the applicant shall pay to
the Pitkin County Finance Director the equivalent of 1.0
Category 1 employee, indexed to the housing guidelines in `� ``
- effect at the time of building permit application."
The required cash-in-lieu fee at the time of the original
� app2ication was $36,000, however, this amount has increased to
$79,000 based on the 1995 Housing Guidelines. The applicant met �4.
1 �_•J
� 1 � '_
' ;: ,('.
�i'�i
� � ,.
� . '� � :.. . ._ ' ' — _4 ,�'_ ...y-s�..�r..a.-^ ...-;:_. '_ _" �i
� . . . . � . . . . —��i��t
i _ '� T
� � � - � . � � � � . � .. � . . _ '.�k
� . . .�� - � - . . " .. . - .. . � - � . � . . . ,��. . _. . ._..�" �...: .
- .� . . . . . . . -_ , . .. � �
., � `/_� . - - . . . .� �
. � � f � . . � � . � . - - . -4',�
. � . � . � . �.. . .
� ' . � �. - , . . y+`� . . �`c ._ �: . . � .
i a+�' .
' . . . � .. . . .. . , � . � - r . . � � . . , �. ' � �� .
�, ,. : I
� '--�.. .��.:. � __r_ . _..-_ .:: -..i,,.�. �� � .. �.
�I . .. � � . .. � . .._.. � . . '
. '..�'�fl�y�,- - . ._ � .. . . .. � � , - . . . . . . .
..,<. . ' ... . ' . .
.�
�_�__ -�--- _
_ _ -- _-�.�n-
� ��i�-U�.. �1�,:''�7.�Vw.4iP4��i�.. .�'A�fi 1/'., � •.. . ? r � , " 14� t��,'p� Sr ac'�Y�,.. ���TiY�/
; •. .. .n's.,. :':f:...:. .. . ..,�: . 1�.�.....�...�w.�LGY�tII...�.SYIfL��e• � '�.i.~C �L�'�Zf'��
.. .�.f�:�+',
�'
�'. � � i
b ;` a��T
``j with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority ih March to discuss �`-.':
' adjusting the required cash-in-lieu fee. The Housing Authority � :r
� xecammended that deed restriction of a for-sale studio or one � ti
bedroom unit in town to Cateqory 3 Guidelines would satisf•� the � '��
� �equirement of Resolution No. 94-127. A Category 3 ownershiF unit i�!'� �i,�
?� upvalley was considered to provide a comparable benefit to payment jc:.;.':
r in lieu, and the deed restriction is easier to enforce for an ��- -
� ownership unit as opposed to a rental unit. ry � r
��
7 ,
$ COMKENTB: Se�ion 3-1905 of the Land Use .Code allows
- a��,�val of a minor amendment to a development permit that is M .� -..
iri�Ee ded to change an element or condition of a development permit. :r,w...:. :
� TYie proposed amendment complies with the standards as follows: ��".-^.`_��,
4�
1. The amendment will not change the use of the Happy Day �;`f
property. .;q; ,
2. The amendment is consistent with the original development
� � review and does not constitute a new land development �c'�
! activity. An existing unit will be deed restricted.
I
, � ,i
3. The proposed amendment does not;
.�
`i • impact the basic character of the Happy Day Ranch; a
� • create any additional. off-site impacts in the surrounding
� neiqhborhood; i
' I • endanger the public health, safety or welfare;
• violate any Land Use Code standard;
• impact on-site parking or utilities;
-,4) • affect FAR or open space. '
The Winfield Arms unit has been approved and inspected by the
" ''; Housing Office.
, RECOI�II�SSNDATION: Staff recommends apgroval of the proposed
` amendment to Resolution No. 94-127, based on compliance with the '"
I requirements of Section 3-1908 and the approval of the proposed
� unit by the Aspen/Pitkin County Hausing Authority. This approval . '
_:_'�__
�__� is suhject to the following conditions:
` � 1. A deed restriction shall be recorded with the Aousing office
upon sale of the unit to a qualified resident of Pitkin
Gounty.
:
2. Prior to recordation of the deed restriction, the unit shall �
be inspected by the Building Inspector and shall be required '
to comply with the life/safety requirements oP the Uniform
_ . I . Building Code.
' 3. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations ,
{ made in the public meeting and in the application.
,. �_i
' 2 � Ii
�,q
� � .1� ;;1.
;� -
,
,� , ';.
,
� '.
__.._ »
/ — --..�.��.......-- - " ��}' ;.
..� . ` ; ,
�� ` !• � ,
, _
� � , � � ' . , :_ ,, .,.
...-
1 ' . '�, ..
. .
� .
. _ . ; • . . �
'•�� • _
S
;�..
.e,- � . � • � �� ' .
�j-• �.�ir�t.��r��TJai����'`..��S'�utY_. ,. '3. � ., � ' , n
��ta•:�- . . :w� ... . dl:f.j`L•.MrtG6:�ttc.::4i+SMVnRen�m.:e.,.....x..».w,......�......q�..a�e. .
�:':N:,Y4'kl�'..
�_ Vi`
� � 6-4-45 ,
�� � -�
� �:;� �{;
t�'-.�;
_ i s�^.
�` AGENDA ITEM SUNUVIA,RY -:,.
i,�,�,y
TO: Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners r, i,j
Regular Meeting-Augccst 9, 1995 �C''. :
�, ;::
THRU: Sozarme Konchan,Community Development Directo r
--. . __:,�'.
FItOM: Tim Malloy,Plarming Office >� �
r,^:�t:
- � RE: Conundtum Applicarion Status Determination `'�
:,,;°.,-.
� ;
REQUEST: The App[icant has requested a detenninadon as to whether the Conundrum Marble ?
� Mine application can be reviewed under the"old'Land Use Code.
�PPLIC.�'VT: Colorado Conundrum Marbte Corporadon
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATNE: Howard Gelt,Sherman and Howard �
STAFF COMMEMCS: An appticarion for a proposal to mine mazbie in the Conundrum Creek � .
Valley,�vithin the Mazoon Bells/Snowmass Wildemess boundary,was submitted to the Counry
in April of 1993.By letter from the Ptanning Offce,dated May 24, 1493,the then applicant �
(Stefan Albouy)was informed that the application was incomplete.The May?4'�tetter aiso �
. advised Mr.Albouy as to what additional information would be required in order to complete the �
_ application(see attached letter). �
An amended appiicauon was subsequently sabmitted to the Planning Office on November l5, � �
1993.The amended applicurion was also found to be deficient for numerous substantive reasons, �.
which�vere outlined in a letter from the Plannittg Office dated December 3, 1993(attached), t
+� _� _ After the December letter,there was no activity on this application for 18 months. ;�� �
� .
F
While it is an informal Ptanning Office policy to retum applications which are inacrive for more
than four months,such action was delayed in deference to Mr.Albouy and his family,and in
- ! recognition of his unforiunate death.
�
( In April of 1994,fhe Counry adopted a new Iand use code.At the Lime the"new'code was ; ,
i adopted,the Board of County Commissioners also adopted Resolution#94-68(attached).The
purpose of this resolution was to establish a policy regarding how applications which were in ;
process at the rime of adoprion of ihe"new'land use code should be handled Resoluqon#94- �
68 includes the following statement which is pertinent to the Conundn�m Marble Quatry
appIication:
�4':
a..
;�`:.°;
ji 1 '
; (�
�,c:.
� � .
4�;
� 1
� �%
"'"^'+�:tc^as..-taJ.ks�ur+�—^—
1 / . �'Y.:r�.+-la&'°S"y".e+.y.ayr�tG'W.e�rst:� R vAr'i*.�...-' ^y r,.ee �$iFo-NM+'_d:wn..,'5.�,s..:.i.i:o"o>rr�--_..
.. '. t' . . ., ___��.�
. . . . . _ .. �� . y-..
_' � . . . - � <�
. ` .. . .. . • , . .- �Y�� ��
,
. � .. � l>� ''' . _ . \
�
. i :.. . . r•�. , f`
� .' . . . . ' S Y . � .. .
. .. . � .. .... . .
. . . ' .'.'� ' .�r_ ._J...�. .- ._:�1:_�- � : .
. .. " . . - � ,� .
�� .. . . _ � . . -.: . � . .:.:. .. .. ... ._.. � �. .
���.a� _ ,
. � � ,
_ ,f, - � •
:?,�
._.,
,
;... , , ,
_ . -- -����•':
� � .Y t{
°�
�
�{ �c.
1 "All acrive land use applicarions thai have been submitted by March 16, 1994 sha11 be reviewed 3���'.
pursuant to the existing Land Use Code." � ,. .
�:,�ti;��
it is the opinion of the Planning Office that this application did not meet the"active'criteria.0 �� y'ly
- _ j of March l6, 1994,since the application had been deemed incomplete and there had been nr
� further activity or communicarion from the applicant
G.,. ,.:
�":; � r
� Since the adoprion of the"new'land use code,the Board has considered several requests for � o :�,'-
<`i deterntinadon regarding the applicability of the`bld"versus the"new"land use code.The test ft,
_ _,{ which has been considered in these cases is whether the application was"substantially L�,,x
� complete"as of the Mazch I6'�date.In the case of the Conundrum Macble Quarry application, � y';
the P(anning Office letter of December 3, 1993 is evidence that this appiicarion was not �
substantially complete.The Planning Office still has not received the informarion requested in
the December 2,19941etter.Further,no azgument was ever offered by the applicant or his I a .
representative,that the information requested by Staff in the December letter was not substantive . � .
in nature or that it was unnecessary for a thorough review of the proposa(. Therefore,it is the t� v: •
position of the Planning OY�ce that the November 15, 1993 application is not eli;ble to be a.-
�;'.
reviewed under the"old"land use code.
Since the"new'land use code includes numerous chanees to regulations and a completely �}
different system of reference numbers,the application,as submitted,would also need to be
revised to reflect these chanees as well as providing the information requested in the December
- 1993 letter from the Pianning Office.There may also be other information which will be
. necessary for the applicant ta provide based on changes in the regulations within the"new'
Code.If the Board agrees�vith Staff that this application should be processed under the"new'
� Code,Staff recommends that the applicant attend another preapplication conference with a
planner to deterntine whether additional information is necessary.
- RECOMMENDATION: Staff recotnmends that the Conundrum Marble Quarry application be
revie�ved under the '`new" Land Use Code and that the applicant set up a preapplication
conterence with Staffto identify what revisions and addirional information will be necessary to 1
complete the applicauon. �
� ATTaCH114ENT5: i
� i�
'� I. Resolution#94-68
� 2. May 2�, 1993 Planning Office Letter ,
'i 3. December 3, 1993 Pfanning OY�ice Letter �� '•
� �. Miscetlaneous Letters from Sherman and Howard LLC _• ` � �
. aisconun.doc { `
_ �.
� �_`i
. • � �',
'i
�
��
,
.
_ , ; - , -.����.��.�:�� ��.. - - -
- ��.
. . �/ . _ � � . . -, . � i..
t /
1 �
. � _ ... `: � � � `5�
�;,. _ ,' . . . / . .
. . ' . � t;.t/.i ' . , _
. � ' �� �/ .... .
. 1 1 .. . .. . .. , I' .
, 1
�, tr. . , -
._. ,-„ ..�.- .- , ,
". . , y _..
�; .
?�i��"� , " y �
.P• .
.'y�PrZ
'�+��Y .. . - ' , ' . - � .1 . . . . . w
'e�$Y NT-.k���
r 3 t
. ( Y!'.
1 ,^ . � ''h. Y 4
. �_,
.y;
�: , '
� �.�:�;:
. .
� BESOLIITIOH OP T�.4 HOARD GF COII�iTZ CO�ISSIO�B . ( "-..
� i'3'-t:
Op PITE�i COIIliTY, COLCR8D0s ltBGaADI2iG T� DISPOSITI02T •'�'�:���
::':;:'.i'y
08 L1ND DSVSLOPliffi4'i' APPLIC�TIO�t$ '�T aRS ffi P80CS88 c ,,:.:
.,�,._
118EaT T� RSVIB� PIT1Q'�' CAQ.EITZ LBMD II8E CODE IS SnCPT'.!D �%�,:�:'.: Y
( Raaolution �io. 94-� � 1� �
� . , . �::e':_��'::.F.�:
__. _._� . ' . .
;7''::_''
- � . � . . � �':"�y-�;.;:
:.�:
.. . �- �r � �>.,.
_i
RECTP.�I,S <.'
; 1. Pitkin County is in the procass of adopting a revised Land IIse (�;a `
' Cade. ' � �'1
• �.
t
1;�
Z. In some instances `.�e revised Land Use Code conta�ns di==�rent i''�
_ � :�..
�.j
�.
standards P_om t5.ose i.-: the ex:.st�zg Land Use Cade. ,;
i :�'3
3. Apnlicants who have pro�ec'-.s that are cur:ently in the Land
' IIse Review procnss have requested that the Hoard of County ��:
Ca�ssicners adopt a palic_� state:aent reqard?ng t�e �eat�e.nt oP °.
�'��
those applications tsat have been submit�ed pursuant to the
. exis��,nq Cade hut may be ag�ec�ed by revisians adapted in the new
Cade. 4�
- 2i0A� T:�QRB, HE I'1' HSSOL�SD by the Board of Caun�� I
� , .
_, i Ca�issioners of Pitkia Caunty that Land IIse applications c.ir_ently r
� . ! • - . ;
.:,� in procQSS shaZl be �rctces6ed, as rolldws: ;;
1. Al1 active larid use appl�cati6ns that have been submitted by �'
. . March 16, 1994, shall be reviewed pursuant to the existinq �
Land IIse Cade. .
2. Apnlications submi�ed Prom Mazch 17, 1994, until the date �'
that t�e Hoard apnroves the new Code may be pracessed pursuant �.� ��,-;
� � .�'1 '���7
ta the requ?ations i.n either the existinq Code ar the propased �� '
Code, at the applicant's discretion. � ;.�
..,,,_- _.�,.� � <::�:.._.,:-.�. .-----�:.....,, -
_.-.-- ' - —_.._..�.
:i i
�.�!k�A`l.�Wl:iAi�sV�ruy� . , / .— — � . . ' � . ..� �}��!
f �
.' j�� . . . .. ' .. . . .. ���� ,y�.
� .. � . . . ' . �� .. "Fs
. . .� . . . . ��.;�
. . ' � ;' - . �' ♦
.. _ , . . .,l" . . . ' .
.. . � �� � .k�,
, �, _ - . . � .. ' ' � . � .
� . . ..�� ' . - � . . . . r-'. � . � � ,
. .' . � . . . � . .-� ._. . .. . . .. - .
. 1 11 . - � . . . .•� . ... , '. . .
':.._ ' ' �..,.. �� � �. . '...-� ... : �� ..��.'�_ � : � . . . . . . . . .� { ,
' '- " '�"_"._.. ._. _�.`�_�.,_ .; .. �.ei�.-,' . . _. : .. . . � . � � ,
. �'4^. � � ����s. . . � . .. � - . . . .. . . _.. . .�.. -' � �. � _ � . . .
`'�;��„t [o , .
,-.z:
jP�'
— _�.� _ ... _
_. . wr};•-;E•.
. •• .. 'j�t;�„.��,I �,,:
y:
�
� ..
..} . . . :• AI
�l �solntioa 8a. 94-�� . .�; ..'�d
� p,g. s 1:��: -_:::
;,..,.
i ,t'•.;�-;.. ..
3. After the data t'sat tha Board apnroves the rtew Cade, a21 «•;.�.��
� `,��;.��:•w
applications recaived shall be processed pursuant to the aew � ' +
' `-: �
Cade. ����' `s.
� ;�h'' r
4. If Garieral Submission was approved for an appli.cat�on pursuant . J"� � :
f:
=-= -` ta ttte existing Cade, Detail.ed and Fi.nal Submissions shall �r `�z- :
;'��+' ;
" also be processe� putsuant to the existinq Cade. � `�; •
g, The gcard may, in its discretinn, allaw an acnlican�t to �
i �
pracass art app2?cation pursuant to the new Cade even if i� was r� K�
� .
initiated pursuant ta the existi.aq C�de regulat:ons, i: t�e ��'#.. "
...�:
Hoard det�^;*+es t�at such azi acrion .rcu1� be mut�.�ally '• .�;�it.
benefici.al to t�.e applicant and the Caunt�. ��'�
APPROVBD �DiD aDOPTSD OH 'F3E 26T3 DBY OF APRIL. 199i.
���
� �'+r'4
HC�tD OF COIIHTY Ct�lISSIOliE88 i; :
I OF PITSIB COIIHT°. COLOR�DO �
�
j ���/���/GcJ•�� �:
� tHobart lf. �ild �+e,s;r...,, �
Dats S�/Z7 �`��
.I 1'S 1!SST: / / , �
.`�. �
---i �+%i,f//./!_ � •
J
I J�attti Joa�s /'
_ D�pts� Ciark and H�cordar
, i �PFROVISD E�8 TO F08H: � �PPROPSD BH TO CO�i't'Sn1TL ` ' .
...�„r"_,��� �., l4 W,� [1 G�II�--�' �;
�� a� �
Tiaothy s. . 8nsaaa� loncbaa. �i:;
CDIIII'� �t �S' • � CpIIII� p],�wwiwQ D�.SOC�Dr .:.,+ ' "`"i
..���'� � � . �'.. _
� , . . � #t'� '
!c e.
�
i
_'--__ ,,,�.•.-- �•--- '--�a.q::J..'--_ . ----,.:..:�r ��t.'v
.�'�u.i.�:�a �`. .
� . / . . �. .. �.i
1 fi',�;� ,
�
�a ,,,.::� :
_ ,' - . � .. . � ,�7 �';�
� � - -: . '�:. �. . .. : . . . ��. , .` '. . ��. .'�. � _�. � �._ . i;�r
: _ _. . . . . . . � .. - � ,.}� � t
c t
. . . . ' . .. " ���, . �.�
, - .. _. l> " .. - ,�.
, . . :� . . �� _ � ..
,. . . � . . . ':`,�-i' .
l � ' . �, _
, ;: - ,.- . . .
,_ ~ _ - _ , t
: �. : �
�: _ �
.�,•�.,�,w , . . - . .
,.,�. �
}��
, w�... ,..�.�.. ._, _ �M._
'�.��,- : :�- u�.::. _ . .. . - . . j
:y�;.�1i ki;:
_ �.r�:�cl�i•-.
��i . . . . �'.
i
_,:a
:� � . . .: 5..:.
"I.' . . '�� .:.'f�,t.�l
:l
. . l. ...
r 1'
, ��. f� 'y
� �.-.. . .
� ' '•'':•~�
. - -_ � • r•'}. ��'�:.
AsrQt•Pmcct • ;#,; '
� . . � � PLANNIKG At ZONINC DEPAl1T11EYT � ',S�'
SJ Y
May 24, 1993 • � r�
. ��z �
-_ �.-..-__I � • � � � � �a�;�„ '::
- I Gary A. i�right, Esq. _ � f ,r�
Wright & Adger �"'�°
Jerome Professional Huilding �'��'
� 20i North Mill .Street . ' � ' : `
�� Aspen, Colorado 81611 ' � • • � ,.:�`:
1.
• I • RE: 'Conundrum Marble Quarry Spe�ial Review, �IQS,.1o41 Hazar3' �7
Review, and General Submission Application , ..
�Case #�P44-93 - �,} T.
( Dear Ga
rYs •
' The Planninq• Office has completed its preliminary review of the �
captioned apnlication. We have determined t�at `his applicaticn is
incomplete, therefore, we are unable to� schedule it at this ti.me.
The application �is incomnlete both in terxs of �'�e suhmission
requirements as.identified in Section 6-3 of the Pitkin County Land •
IIse Cade, and with respect to the level of detail with which the i -
Policies and Regulations have been addressed. �
_ . �� The following paragraphs summarize the information necassary for
the Planning Office to adequately evaluate -the proposed mini.ng
operations comp2iance with the Land IIse Code. The infor.nation
requested has been organized in accordance with tlie farmat •
established for submission contents Pursuant to Section.. 6-3.2 of .
_ i the Land IIse Code. • i ,
. � . . ,
4 ' • ' ' '
, , 6-3.2 Submi:ssioa Coatents: . � .
6-3.2fa1 �Anvlication Form: For our records we would like to have , f
I•. this form filled out. In addition, we will requise that a an
, . . I "Agreement to Pay" form be completed and signed by all necessazy
parties. Copies of these Eoims have been enclosed with this letter.
e
! � 6-3.Zfb1 Prooertv_ Ownershin Information: The attarneys •letter of E .
title, Exhibit "A", that you refer to in the application was •not �
- provided. When preparing this document, please provide the names t
and addresses of all owners, including the name of the apprcpriate � ,
contact person at the United States Forest Service and the official �`"`
�":
, ' 1 . . " . � �:;t
i • I.
I � �';
130 Souix G�u.r•SrR[n • AsrEw Cuwanao 91611 • PxodE 303.92DS090• F.x 303:9?Oa 147
�.�.........
� � .......— '-�-------�.a� �.
. _ _'-'r�iCGCC�,:.-r._ .._--•� . ' -----
---- r.�.....r .� R_�;: .w..y__ . - . y; : .
, . .
�
. . � � . . . � . . � - .. �.y;
. . .. . . � t � i
t
_ _ . ...,` _ 4 .
• '.+'
1
� � ` � .� . . . . . j�_ r`�• � � .
_ �
. .,� , . . . . ,
,..- __.. �„- .� --: ''' 'i'--t .. , ) '
.
. _.
�; , - .
• ��'S,�F`' " n ���
, . �
,;��,�t!
�_��.,�, ,� _ _
���. . . . � � ,. -.,.,a.�....r.•..,��.��'»i.:.•c«.�.L.w:..-�u1a:::.iXtiri�7t+44![��� 'f r",
• �r: r'�'i?k;,
,.: {
t`,:;
� ,
�;n:�a�,
address for notification purposes. We also require that you .=,��:'
provide addressed envelooes for each of the adjacent pro ert � � `"
:' P Y :1'. �-.:.
; owners as well as any other persons having an ownership or leqal r:�''.. �.
� interest in the subject property. �:�`''- '�>
I ��� '��
I In addition, a "Memorandum of Understanding" is required cover'_:g '"�;���''';,ry,
all aspects of the agreement between the U.S. Forest Service _d :���� ;,; .'.
the Applicant reqarding groposed operations and improvements on c.:e � �' �
ro erty. In :)=:% s.
P p particular, this document should address the following j._,f,?:.. r
unresolved issues:
i "�=.;_,�:.
1. Whether or not sedimentation ponds are to be used, and ,:�:?,� ';
- if so, all nertinenc details related to such ponds • ; x:�,
, includinq their nwnber and location, capaaity,. '� �`
construction details, impacts to naLUrally occurrinq �''
wetlands and streams, and plans for reclamation once the ��'•' '
'mininq opera�ion is terminated. i�.
I�<_ `�
�.•,
2. Whether or not workers are to be housed on site, and if • ��;,`�
• so, all pertinent details with respect to how this would t� . �'
be accomnlished includinq type and location of
structures, number of wor!cers to be housed, provision of ,..`�a�=
domestic uatzr needs, disposal of wast��aater, how solid �. ','�r
waste will be disposed of, provisions for emergency �
services, and fire prot2ction.
..�.-
. 3. Terms of operat'on including start 8ate in the sprinq and
date of closing in the fall, hours o= operat_on, and
agreement reqardinq holidays and weakends.
4. Plans for mitigation of imnacts to corest Service surface `z;��`
estate including, and in particnlar, miCigat?on and j:
manaqement ei visual imoacts boLh uaon termination of
mining activities and dur-ing mininc onerations to ensure
minimal impac� on surrounding wilderaess and recreation
resource. In addition, mitigacion of noise impac�s on �r F4
surrounding wilderness and recreat±on reseurce.
5. Whether or not core drilling will•be allowed. �
,
.:�. ' 6=3.2(cl vicinitv-TOnoaranhv Mag• This reauizement has been
°- satiss'ied.
, 6-3.2f31 Mavnina: The map included in the applicatian was •i
; inadequate. Maps must be prepared at a scale adequate to clearly
. show the information outlined below. Maps illustrating informaticn ' . '
pertinent to the MLRD Per.nit area and roadway improvements (items ; '
.2,3 & 4 below) should be prepared at a scale of 1"=50'. All other
maps should be prepared at 1"=300� unless otherdise noted. �(;
, � ;.
1. Natural featu:es of the site includinq streams, �;`i
wetlands, vegetation massinq and types, and topography ;�'
,
. , Z •'-_
. �,.
�y '1�
. ��
, .
? ,*:
�----- - --�.�:.'��..�.— __ --
, —......,4.:,.�:,�:��;,���.._--,-� �.�,:;=;--.-._._. :.u�w,.�:, .__ _—�,......,,.:,� '��;-
� :
.,;
�- . ' �; 4
' � .
�, ��''
�..c - ,^'
. . .
, . . �
_ . � , .. .
� � . . � - . . . . .� .. . . . . � . � :j ...,, . . . . . . .. � .
1 � .
. <, ,: o • �
�. ..
__� ._:
-.�. �: � � , � .
'�5 f�"•�' . , .
,.,F.
�►
. ,�'0C � �.�r`�1M,ikrd.�'!:... S��rL'iY�._ .,. `M�4: <:ad+-.,, . . � ...'A� ... ._ 9�(��uY.tivf``k.frii:n;ln.1�..1s4..- -`�!�}' � ��+tn_:�eititcy3°JC�:,^..�.G u+. r:
7 �tik���'
'sl �:k:f*fV�i'.
. �`*5
A (provided) T`';�,+t�t+
"',a
1 2• Property boundaries, boundary of the MLRD permit area, �_���
and easements if applicable. � �.,,.��`
3. Existing improvements includinq, all existinq structures ''�cl�i,�
(cabins and steam boiler identified as possible cultural
� resources in the DEIS should be labelled), existing
equipment, access road, County Road, location of exist�ng `�;, ;r
mine face, and loadinq platform. 4-�'` ��
es:3:
- , 4. Proposed operations and improvements includi.ng 24" rail '�- .
line, sedimentation ponds (if proposed) , fuel stor.aqe �;:�r"->.
tank, maintenance and storage trailers, trailers Eor �`+;'`'�:
' housing employees {if applicable), privies, vehicle i r
parking, derric:c and boom, other mi.ninq equ3pment, marb2e 1 '
' , stockpiTing area, waste product stockpiling azea, and �
; fencing. • - �
;
5. In addition to the information discussed above, t'�e 's
- I following infor.nation is required to evaluate 1041 hazard �
� issues; detailed slope analysis of area o£ i.mnrovemencs
� (1�RD Permit Area) and access road (including County '�
Road), potential avalancne hazard areas and known
avalanche chucas, Eloodplain boundar� (is mapped) or
- normal hiqh water mark, areas of riparian veqetation,
geoloqic hazards including areas mapped for slide
potential, rock=all, potentially unstable slooes, and
alluvial fans.
6-3.2�e1 Camoliance Wfth Policies and Reaulat�ons• The anolication �
did nat r
provide enough detail to. evaluace compliance with the +
. - , Policies and Requlations of the Land Use Code. The followinq ?
information is required: z
�
- 2-2 Compliance �dith Othet Laws: The Apolicant shou�d address �
compliance with Federal Clean Water Act and State e�,ir qual.ity
regulations. • }. ,
�' � 2-3 Natural and Man Made Hazazds: Describe type and amounts �1 .
, _; of explosives to be used. Descaibe how explosives wil]. be 3. �
'i transported including type of storaqe container, vehicle used,
frequency of transport, source of explosives, route of travel,
and provisions for sterage' on site. Also, provide copy of !
� : license for person handling explosives.
i i
i Provide geelogists report discussing geologic hazards and any j �
I impacts of usinq explosives in an area mapped for rockfal.l { '
; - hazard and potentially unstable slopes. This report should +
address hazards and describe mitiqation of hazards for i
operat2ons area, and �oadways. ;4;
�'':
:,�•;
.. , 3 �
� .
I ' � '.
�
�
��. . ...�--..._ ,---"w,.:el:4�.�'�..>::r.aw-�' ....-`_� a..w�'+rs - . ...:.;�,.-�,-----_......a:..x.�--�---. �...--�_.......----- ..�} -��:
4Y � ' _ " . . . .. .. . . . � '
. .. � . � - , ' . .' ��
, . . . . . . . ��f
.. �~ .. " . . � . � \
., . . . , :'�� `
. . ' � . '� . � . . . . � .. .4'. '
I . - . � . . . . . .� . . . .. .
.` . . . . . . _ . ;� r .� . .. . � '. .
' 1 . � ' � . � . -� 'I . . .. � .
. . - .._�. _ . . - .. �( ..� . .. . . • . . � � �,
�: � . . . . . . . � . . . � � .. � . . �
. . . . .. . . ?� .
'��t��kr''" . . . _. . . . . . . .
,j .
�
r.:' �
. .��,t � •_ yr.,,,i �1ti�t� �.5.�.�
r. ... '%.r.�l�n..i�'�!4:'vkJ'.. . .4•7.*av'..`_. �u�. `.«w�..� .. .�+t6� ._.o._.. 7`�it>'M.`antLrif��''��.1.}."'�'�a.'c�1f:��' ��'�t�e i� ��n�.i%;
lr, � a.
^F�' �.
u:�.
py �w '�¢
. ' {wYa, [','
,,::��53
• Provide 3nformation regarding transport and storaqe af diesei wy;��%.
Euel including capacity and type of storage tank, and plaas ���
� to mitiqate contamination of soils from a potential spill, and i'fir-,-`:>
j e'stimates regardinq quantity of fuel to ba used. 7";;,.;��
I �.t�.'. .
� Discuss plans to mitigate hazard to hikers caused by. truck � i�; . ���..•
traffic on wilderness trail. � ''- E•< . �
1�?'�'.-
2-4 Soi�s and GeoZogy: Provide geologists report summarizinq i '���" �r�
issues and mitigation with respect to road and access drive ( '��`�`�'7 •
� �
improvements inc2uding drainaqe, sl.ope stabi2ity, potent�a2 �•.
��- for debris flow and rock •fall. ��'*'`'r '
� ._
�;� �,,,�
. 2-5 Drai,nage & 2-11 Erosion: Provide drainage and erosion plan `� ,
for oQerations. area, access drive and County roadway (1"=50') .
�s,'.,..::
2-� Ad�quate Provisioa oY Water Needs: Provide inforsation I�.w
' regarding saurca of water for domestic use, fi.re crotecEion, fs�.•�
and use in mining operations. Infor.nation should include ��{F r
sourca of water (if we?1 or surfaca waters to be used ��' °
. Proaf
• of leqal r:qht to utilize suc:s waters must be provided),
method of distriburion, estimated quantity to be used on a �°�r. ~
I daily basis (i.ncluding domestic use) , plans for aater storage
includinq caaacity and location. If water is to be brought in
from off site indicate source, IDethod of transpor`, ir2auency +�.
_ 'of transport and provision for on site storage_
2-7 Sewage Treat�ent and Collection: The application s,
indicates that domestic• wastewater will be collected and
removed from the site by vehicle. Further infor.aation should ,.;,;�
be provided reqarding how wastewater will be callected ;i.
(portable privy - capacity, Clpe) , what t�pe of vehicle will "
. be used to transnor� wastewater, how often it will be removed, j�
and where it will be taken for treatment.
_ 2-8 Impacts on •Road System: Additional iaformation should be � �;
required includinq total number of trips per day anticipated, �
-breakdown of trips (employees,_ haulinq marble, t-ansporting . �
• water or wastewaterj, vehicle weiqht (both loaded and .
`� ' unloaded) , trip arigination and destination, and tonnage of �T
- - `• mineral• to be hauled daily and annually. •
' y 2-9 Road Design: Please provide detailed pla for road
imprevements including, a map showinq location o •eas to be �
� improved, detailed analysis of cut and fill, detai. drainage ,
plans, plans and details of all retaining structu: •, width, r ' .
surface material & thic�ness, identify vegetation : scted by • '
improvements, snd nrovide detailed erosion control _ans.
2-i2 Comaatibility with Si.storic and Arcaaeological F :ources: �� �
In addition to identifyznq the location oE the t 2er and ; ��.
cabins as required under the discussion of mapping E _lier in � -
;,� 4 � ( "
�
i
. I . � ' +�3 + .
� � .
..�1�`-;S:�.
. . � "�'�na;i2;:?��.
' '_._ .��r'�:k1«.`:i.uxei+"J"_ ..t:....-�.. _._., :....::?s:s . ........... __—^_ _. �31 l
. � . �l � '�
�
. , � . ;
^ ._ �' .
� - .� �
\ _
• . .
'�, � f,
- . ' /
-__. ._ _ _- - ':� - �
�: � .
'.��� . �
��:
�� + , ;C A � 'L..�L Yt
�..'.,..,�'aF:'�;2e�l���S-:v,• r.?%7�rI: :u� J9':, '+i�E';' �n .:"� w.`'...nar. �'�`rt aE' �t' YF d,:G�e�� IF'vxk' � 7 �°.a,� ..
. 'i�,7i�.1uW�.l�u.�.Y'��� �..ra-�;�i� � .r�°,.
ry�"4
�y:
.. . ��s, a` .u
+� �;i
`� ��:
,�'�:.�
' this letter, the Applicant should provide photographs of these i�_7 `_
i structures. �
._� •fit� ';, ,
2-IS Hoasiag: The Revised Mininq Plan indicates that 10-12 '�'�`����
I people will be employed initially. The plan also indicates '•'"1_'.'�:i-j
that additional employees will be needed as subsequent phases :._.,� ;: •:
are commenced. The Applicant should provide additional :�+:_,- .
information regardinq phasing and.how many employees will `� • " ':
:>,s,.,. r
ultimately be required. The applicant shauld also clarify :_i;;;.;;,:; :•
whether any employees will be housed on site. Tf employees are ;:�'`-'•F. `
__.. . not housed on site, then additional inforaiation should he �
';-}'� :
provided as to where they wi21 be housed. If emp2ayees will ,� ._
be haused on site, then refer to item 2 under the discussion , � ,�:`
of 6-3.2(b) of this I.etter for additional informatian `��
necessary regarding on-site housing. '�-,,
��_�
i 2-16 Scenic QuaZit-�: In order to evaluate the imgacts o� the ,.,
proposed marble mining operation on the adjacent public trail ;���7
and the sur_�ounding wilderness resource, the Applicant should !�:; . ..
provide graphic exhibits depictinq the pronosed mining �
activities from se2ected viec�rooints (especialll as viewed from '�;�1'a ^
pablic trail cor=:.dor) . These exhibi.ts could be in the for:n = "'�
of sketches, modi�ied photcgraphs or computer grannics as
described in the Draft Environmeatal T_mpact Statemenz.
Z-17 A.ir Quality: Please provide additional information
reqardinq how dust created by marble cutt?nq, and tra�:ic on
access road will be mit_gate3. Also provide manu;.ac�urers
speeifieations tegarding air auality imnaczs of each piece of
equipment utilized in the aperzt?on. ��%:�s
;�`
2-19 Transportat_on: Discuss aay plans �or utzlizing vans or
other car pooling methods to minimize traf�±c impacts on ;:' _
County Roads_ The application indicates that a helicopter may
be used to trans�or� and locate a dri11 rig. Provide �.�
� additional infor.nation as to the bipe o� helicopzer usen, how r
often it will be used, and the intended f2iqht path.
,�, � 2-22 Water Resource Impacts: In addition to providing
- 2nformation reqarding sedimentation ponds (if proposed) , �Y
discuss how water used for marble cut�ing will be handled,
also provide detailed information.reqarding mitiqation of soil '�
! erosion entering streams from access roads and operations y'
� area. '
' i . .
2-23 Noise: Provide a lis� of specific vehicles and machinery ' ' ;
to be used on the site and manuiacturers specifications
zeqarding noise produc�d durinq opezation. Also provide any ��-
data or specifications available regarding sound suppression
i exhaust systems discussed in the Revised Mining Plan. � .
; +�
t
i Zn addition to the information discussed above, the Planninq Office `�a. ':=;p
. S �r,� 1
. . . . E�.� '.
f�t�
--�— -.
3_�U
' ----_.,.�...�.-�___ ._.._._.�._ ,� �
' .. .. . . ''',ft
._._.--•.��s+:n:..�.�S�,.a+=s,:.- . . „�,� '._-".,,�.-� . _.. --,�,�..� .
-. � � „_,:..� . .�-..----- .
., . ,o-�,,.�....�- . . , '_ '
� . ,.j i
. . �i
' � i +
' _ �, .. ' t� .
,i t: ` .
. , .
' • � . . {„
\ ; -��, = ' .
. � ' � . ... . . . I . . � � . . ,. - � .
. .. . . . .� .�' . •. :. � - - . . , � -... � , . .
� �. _. .� . .._F' .._. ._.._ . . .�♦f._.�_� .,. . . � . �' '.
�. .. � . . .- . .' . .- .. . ..... - . �' � ; ,
�.�7?�,� .
,t• '
��
�,Y.,� �
�.5��: .. _ _ ......_. �__�.._.._.....�...._.._,�....._,�.., n•e ��,ry,.,�,;.
. �,�y
� �
. -� is expecting to receive an application for commercial GMQS to be ;��i
processed in conjunction with your application for Special Review, t' �
� . 1041 Hazard Review and General Submission. . `
6 ' • ' }r3;.r
b-%.��y� -.
The Planning Office fees for this application have been increased "irr;,:'��
since the pre-application form'for this project was prepared. The �,+'y .i_y
new fee is $3,925.00 plus $140.00 each for the Environmental Health Y,.
,e.:.:...,�
" Depart:aent, County•Enqineer and Housing Office. See the attacned ;,c.,_: . .
"Agreement to Pay" form for additional informatian reqarding Pees. �`� s
In additian we will. need 35 capies of all information instead of `'�= , �!�
the 25 copies indicated on the preapplication form. The additional '��° •
�
I copies are required i.n ,order meet our referral needs. �
� _� I would like to conclude by informinq you that Ellen Sassano and '�.�.;
� . I will be working toqether on this case. Z wiTl be assuming the �'`��• '
_ � lead role but Ellen, will be involved in all phases of the project ^`' :�
and will be kept i.nformed of any information relative to the case. "` •'
4uestions and phcne calls should be directed to me initially, �'` �
however, iP I am not available Ellen can answer any questions. `,?fg>,
. :�.
-;�:,
Sincerely,
�
Timothy G. Mallo.y . .,i`�
Senior Planner
- cc: Ellen Sassano
Suzanne Ronchan
Reid Haughey .,� .
Tim WhitsitL
�.
� , . •
�- �
,i ,
,, . . .
,.� _
,a�
�.
—_ . . .. . � . - . i,:
�,` —,' R
,.. ,.. , . .. �. .. ..
• :- i . '��� � ... .��� . ..':� . .. ...� ... . �'�.S
1 � �
i
I . . .. -...�I.
�4
. "� . . � . � . ...1 �.
� �' ��r
__. � c 6 �
� � '
� � ,�i
� . . . . . . . . . . .. �i�.
. � i� � ,
- ,� � �;
. . t�
--- � - -
- , � :.. .,
� ���
K
, �
. >,�`� ,:
.; ; ` , , :�
.: ��-�.
' �;�4 � ;
� ' ��
i` f, : ` s
� n): �~ ! _ I _
:`t f
� _ _ , �i,r. .
i4
\ ` �
. _
ar".. 1. a ' , . ���� ..
'�� � � _ .,;F _ .
- • ,. ..
' .,; ... . ..�
, .� � , ,-r-.- �._. . ,. . .:�_� .
� .
. � . . - � � � .. � . . . . . ' . . . . � .
` . _ � . .. .. , ,.' . . . � : .. � - � 3 ' .. .
. �.: ' - � , � ..
.
.
: ,
��n.'' i�:•,c:..:�� �r.au��,.. ..�_.. . _ � . ... _
. . .... - ia �.__ . s . ....u.-..�.....�.�..�,��...�.�..y" _'"", ' �JS� � �'�:�
u�w r.i
. ` Ef+{� .l�F...i.
YS.:
. � . ��'�7�Yi
. ` ��� ��L�/Y� �(/, � ��.
a �3 :
Y� ti�
i • ' ..
. � . �'�^�.�.��•I:''�.' .
� � � (;.i.. .
�
1 ��(•-
' . . . , � .:4-.
I • i
� December 2, 1993 � •
_._ _...i � . _ . _ � . . ��,� ;:
� �;
� Gary A. Wright, Esg. ' °,`��+.�
� Wright & Adqez
�...
� ,Terome Professional Buildinq ! °
� 201 North Mill Street '���
� ?,spen, colorado aloil '% �
- � � � ��'�?�
RE: Conundrwa MarSZe Quar:1 Special Reviea, G,lQS, 1041 Hazard �;, ,.
Review, and Ganeral. Submission Applicat_on .��_. ,
Case �P44-93 �;,a
I `�',.r
� Dear Gary: �
';t:
_- The PLanning.of�ice has comoleted its prelirainary revie,r of the '�'
captioned application which was submitted on November 15, 1993. We
have determined that this application is incomplete, there.�ore, we '
are unable to schedule it at this time. The application is
incompZete both in ter�s of the submission xequi�ements as ,
identified in Sect:ion 6-3 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code, and �A�
with respect to the level of detail with .rhich the Policies and r� �
_ Regulations have been addressed.
' As vou knaw, the Planning Office revie:�ed a previously submitted
.- � application for this project and by letter dated May 24, 1993 �:
info�sted you t.'1at the application was incomglete. The �ay 24th r
letter listed several thinqs which were either missinq or were `
insufficiently addressed in the previous application. The current '
_ �:�: .` applicacion has provided some ef the infonaaLion lacking in the !
previous application, hawever, the current application is still ;
, deficie^t. The following paragraphs summarize the infarmation �;,
neaessary for the Planning Office to adequately evaluate the
proposed mining operations compliance with the Land Use Code. ��
6-3.2 Submissioa Contents: �
r' ,
6-3.2lb) Pronerc•� Ownershio Infor.nation: The attorney'S letter � . .
rsquested in the previous letter fram the Planning Office was
included in the current application, however, we also requested ���
t:�at you provide addressed envelopes for each of the adjacent
pronerty owners as �rell as any other persons having an ownershi� � .
or legal interest in the su6ject property, these envelopes were � � �_;
r' `ii i
1 ;� �`
,r
'f ',.,;
; , �
! ----.�.�..�,..,,,_.._.- ----W-^-------__�---- .,�,:,�:;-. �`
_ .. ,.._.,...- y,••-- -----..w.'.::.�.--�--.-�---`.�,...c.....Y.�---- � .
M1.
. � - . . . " . 1 J
' � ` #
- . . • . ' �: ` � 5•..
�1 �
w�„ ' �� �• � �.-
, �. . .- `'' � ' f ''. .� . � 1
��
1.���� ' . . i. , " .
. . . :�.: " . .�-,' : ': t �. .� : l ., � .�r. ',.{. r .. . �- . ..
�. .
.._` �. . . . , :� . ��. . . . : ..'^. . �.;-���
.� � i � +,
> �.
„ � •
.�.- _ ' _
_ _ __ . ._ i .7
�; , - , -• . ,
r�'�� __ � V
��� •
.,1!�7�iA.� ' .�r`�,i_ �r;9�L.....c ..o. _ .. . ... _ �._ � � � , • � . ....�... .�...._......_...._..�..�. ....-._..-......—....�...._....n
s;
�'y 1.l�'I.
<(Y� , �-` l'�.
�
� y/',y�
.. 1., i�x�i
not provided. +�..
The previous Zetter f=om the P7.anninq Office also requested a "•� �
"Memorandum of Understanding" covering ail aspects oi the aqreement ;--`s
' bet.reen the U.S. For=st Service and �,:_ ..�r__�ant regarding ;.;",-i;�
proaosed opeYations ar.� improvements on the property as requir^_d
under alternative #2 in �he Draft Environmental Impact Stateme_�t
(DEIS). This docwnent nas sti11 not been provided. This docum=�t " '.
should addzess the following unresolved issues: + !
t:i`. .
-- - � 1. Whether or nat sedimentation ponds are to be used, and
if so, all nertinenz details related to suc� pands ��;;.
� including their number and location, capacity, �.'
_ ; construction details, impacts to r.aturally occurrinq �� �
wetlands and str_ams, and plans for reclamation once the �'�'
minirtq operation is �erminat�d.
�
� 2. Whether or not aorkers are to be housed on site, arid if �
so, all pert�.aent details �aiLh r_spect to how this wo�11d �•'r,.';
• be acc�mplished including tvne and location of ,
st�-uctures, number o= workers to be housad, provision of
domestic �rat=r needs, dis�csa2 oi wastewater, how solid
waste will �e disnosed o�, provisions for emergency
serv±ces, and '__e oroteccion. �
_ �
3. Terms of opersLion including siart date in the spring and !
date of clos�ng in the fall, hours of operation, and
agreement regar3ing holidays and weekends.
� � � � j.
4. P1ans for mit:gation of impacts to Forest Ser•rice surface �
estate includiag, and in particular, mitigation and �
management o= visual impacts both upon ter.aination of ` .
- mining ac�ivi�ies and dur:nq mininq operations to ensure i
minimal impac� on surraunding wilderness and recreation j
, resource. In addition, mit�aacion of noise impaczs on f
! surrounding wilderness and recreation r=source. �
!� �' 5. Provide detai�ed information reqarding cere drilling � '
proposed within the MLRD per.nit area.
` ,;;"j 6-3.2fd1 Manuina: The maps included in the applicat'_�n were
;'r'I inadequate. Maps provided for the MLRD permit area w = very
f crudely. drawn and did noz include topography. In addit: z, the �
proposed operations drawings did not provide specific inf.: zation ; :
� regarding the number or location of on-site parking that c Ld be '
� accommodated within the loadin �`�`
g platPora area, j
i.
Also, mapping for the environmental hazar�s ,:as inadequa . No �
� slope analysis was provided for either the permit area � the �
access road as requested. No information was provided reg �dinq i _`�.,
rockfall hazard, potentially unstable slopes, or alluvia_ fan � ��:.
areas. In addition, the maps do not identify the normal high water �:�_�;
�, ; _
Z ;�1.
�;�
_ � ,`.
.. , . � .. ... T....w.-w,...-_.. -�.�..:.,�.�: -.:r,::u..a..�...w.���..:.�... �...�,�.:.:w.�.�..,.,.----- .
. . .�"_„°`'!�J.iahT.G.:J�:+v,:.w—�" . ..' . ., �.. . . . .. :- � ; : .
� . ' ... . . ��. . .. . � � .
�, �'. - , .� .: . . . � �.- � - � '.�.'�
. / . � .��.:. - .. . . . : .. _ � . . � � . � . vt �.:-..
. . . . . . . . . . , . . } y..,.
.. . � .. . . . - �..
--- `, , i �` �
, ' _ ` s '
. . . . . �.�.. ' ' ' .
� . : .. . i.�..f .. ..
. \ ; � � •� . , .
- :.� . �� . I._ .. . . • ' ' �. . �. . , .
. � . . •j- .. . � �. . � � . �l
� ._ . ..:� .._o. _ ..:..__ : -..'.���,a�... - ......� �. . � • . : ' � ' .
. `� ' .. ' .. . . ' . ,. . .' ... - - � � ' .'
y`�' ti '
� �!`.
jR�t�
. ;'r{i��fp'•p:��:
. . ' _' '�r.i,"�:',:-:�5.'1..
*., }
. 4 �.}'a�Y�..�.
.. ..y.�. iS.:��i
': +a<' 'ti�.
� mark for the Creek and no information is provided reqar3ing '�.� .��'
. ± existing riparian vegetation. The maps provided in the applicacion 1'� �-�:
' do show tao landslide zones but there is no information in the �;�;�.�-
� application reqarding who determined the Location or severity of 6r;�,,��
� these slide zones, nor does the application discuss mitigation of � '
� any hazards encountered alon the roadwa servin the �''�''� �
i 4 Y 4 Proposed �. .`+.,�
cjtlaZTy. ':�;c :.. .`:
1i:�i'
The infarmation reqardinq hazards should address hazards not only ` ':s:�" . ;
in the vicinity oi the MLRD permit area, but also all along the � �: .
roadway from the pezmit area to the parking lot at the entry to the -
Wilderness Area. �;�:::``-::�%-
-- : �x
. . . �s�..��., :
6-3.2re1 Comolianc� 'rJith Doli�ies and Reaulations• The application
� did not provide enough detai? to evaluate compliance �aith the �:
Policies and Requlations of the Land IIse Code. The following
information is rectuired: �:::�, .
�!.,.
2-3 �vatural and Man .?ade Hazards: Provide geologists reaort �i��
discussing qeologic hazards and any impacts oi using �,_ ''
explosives in an area aapped for rockfall hazar3 and g. �
potantially unstable slooes. This repor� should address !�;,`a'�
hazards and describe mitigation of hazards for operations '
I ar_a, and roadways. , ,;;
2-4 Soi1s and Gzo?ogy: Provide qeologists report summarizing
issues and mitigation .�ith respect to road and access drive �c
improvements including drainage, slope stabi�ity, potential
for debris flow and rockPall.
��':�
Z-5 Drainage & 2-1? �rosion: Provide drainage and erosion plan i;, -
for those areas of access drive and County- roadway ca be
�
improved or repaired (1"=50') . '
2-8 Impacts on Road System: Additional information should be
required including tocal number of trips per day anticipated, � i:•
- br_akdown of trips (employees, hauling marble, transportinq
water or wastewater) , vehicle weight (both loaded and .
unloaded), and tonnaqe oi mineral to be hauled daily and
annually. ,
�
2-9 Road Desi�m: Pl.ease provide detailed plans for raad
improvements or repairs includinq, a map showing location of ' '
areas to be improved, detailed analysis of cut and fill, 4
- detailed drainage plans, plans and details of all retaining ,
• structures, width, surface material & thickness, identify ,- , �
� veqetation iapacted by improvements, and provide detailed '
erosion control plans.
`�'
i 2-IS Housing: The current application indicates that operation � •t
, of the quarry will be conducted in compliance with alterna�ive
; #2 in the DEIS. This alternative states that no crew quarters .��
, �.
I 3 ��^
r .
i.
f.;,� ;
��r,
------ _.,�..,�.--� -�•---•-.�...:::�;� -- .. - - �iC �
� �s`�
� �,:
�
. • + • a,'.' �
. � . � _ � . . . ' � t,. . y
. . _' � . ` � . . � � .�,'�
t.. . ' : . . . . . f - ' . . . ..
I. . . ... . ; . . ' � � . .. ' . :� . � .. �..� - • '
1 ; .
1 . � ' � � � . . .
. . . . . � . ... . . - . . . ( ' � .
.� . . -. ' ��. -^ . . .' . � . .� .
.. . .." "_.._ .,,.._.� ,�... ._ . . ',�.i.i._..� � .. . . . . - ��
. . .�: �, � � . ' � �. � �� . . � ' ' .
. `�x�w . - . . ' . . . . � . .
� r i-i
��
.�.*.r..». � . �. � • , .. .. . _ .. . (i.`Y`'�i.�n�r�'':
1 _ I L4.
�
1:,
.. � ' . '�`, �ti
, =� . will be provided on site. However, the application states , •"�':
that 100 percent of the employees generated will be housed on
� site during each operating season. The applicant should �" '
� clarify whether any employees will be housed on site. If �
�:..�y
� employees are not housed on site, then additional information �.`�?.�-"
� should be provided as to where they will be housed. If t''
employees will be housed on site, then additional iaformation <
should be provided as to the location and antit oi an on- �r
4� Y Y :�_;.:':: ;r
site housing. k,°�
! i�' 1 `.
_ � 2-16 Scenic Qua?ity: In order to evaluate the impacts of the Ea.,�
---- � proposed marble mining oneracion on the adjacent public trail ,�.
and the surrounding wilderness resource, the Applicant should °`�`;'`•_,.`
j provide graphic exhibits depictinq the proposed mininq
_I activities from selected viewpoints (especially as vi_wed from
� public trail corridor) . These exhibits c�uld be in the form ;;I,�,, :
i of sketches, modi�_ed photoqraphs or comnuter qraphics as
descrined in the Drait Environmental Impact State�ent. " • c'�9
�' ' ..�,
, 2-Z9 Transportation: The application states that the operation !;°
• will be conducced in compliance with alternative T2 in the �a
__, DEIS. This alternative requires the apolicant to make
reasonable efforts to pool vehicles and emnioyees and minimize ��
the daily num'r�er of venicle trips. The anplicacion should !
include any plans for utilizinq vans er other car poolinq
_ methods to mininize traffic impacts on County Roads to show `
compliance xith the DEIS. The apnlication indicates that a �
helicopter may be used to transport and locate a drill riq.
Provide additional information as to the t�e of helicopter
used, how o=ten ic will be used, and the intended flighL path. I'�
� As this application has be�n deemed to be incomplete we are unable
. to schedule it for revie�r at this time. Also, since this
anplication includes a request for GMQS allotments we would
ordinarily not allow it to be modified and resubmitted for review �
. in the same year. However, since this application is requesting s`
r i commercial GMQS allot:aents, for which we have more allotments �
i available than have been requested, we will allow the Applicant to � . '
_ i revise and resubmit the application. �
a � I �
� -,i If you have any questions regarding the additional information ,,
reque ted in this letter please contact Ellen Sassano or "_'im Malloy
at th Planning Office. '
, . Sinc e_ ,, �'
- Timothy G. Malloy
Senior Planner
' cc: Ellen Sassano � ,
�� Suzanne Konchan + � �,�;
� 4 � l�
�'� '
,J
. . . �:�I::�
.. . .,a,`.._.-- --�....�.�- —°•w t..���""'_"----�ucws..ww�-. �-�� . _ --�"w.aa,tb; t�
� . . . . . . � ��.�.,
�' . .... . . , . . � . �:- ,.r�..
, � � . . . .. . . �,.. ' . ��4 f..
� . . � . . . � � . *�.t I
�
4, . . � �.I . . I`. A
.. � . . (, � �.1.. \S
y � f.
i . =; r-
\, ; �, . . .
, ..
� ' : .. , , ,
,�a . _. . - , '
�
� ,
:,t. .
;�t
" �,._ . , � � __..: _ .
"' � _._:��. . , _ _ . __. -__
- _
��J��c'R i5��:1'�!n ..w�..:'�ip" . .. . . .. ... 1
. - � . . . � . . � � �� .. � �.. � .
T ,
. . .,. . . . .. � `� : .
� Reid Hauqhey {,:
Tym Whitsitt � �'•� z ,
� , :�!.y;.�.
1at incomolete conundrum2 •,
s
— '� },_r ,Z+
�'�
,iZ,',v s:
'� .,r�f i.
{ �"�"i
:� �s
- — .g ¢'t� �,`'I�+r�
,
.-: ... . . .��. `. �� , , �. .� _.�. . ..': '�
�: ���-
� .. . :� >, � . � ��. . -.:: . �
� .::
.. : .. � �- . . . . .���. ..:,� ..
,... _! . �., . . . 1: . ��. ,.;� .:a, . .:_'
L �`0
..
�� ':�
;. :��. ,� . .: :,.. . . :. . �.. _
.. - . .;:: .. :; ::, .
. , .
. � �
. . . . . . , ., . . .;:.
.. , !
..� �.:i . . . ., .. .� . �, �::�;.
.�:.
N•'
I�:
.�.�
t t �.
i:� -
�i$
�,
��
{
t
�r- ' t
1
/. ' �
. .
. . . .
, .. .., � .. .: .:
..
n .,
' �
i. � ..
��
r�
__ n '1
- '°.1
� . ..
s
`.
�4•�
�} ( .�
F �� 5� I� �,.
;4L1':
� � : e, r • � V'.
�� �f � ���� �� 2 t i a c t � w ����F���� �- �� ���'������ia��`� �r � L+L
�
� ;t �,� � ,F zr y�'��^o-�' �t������g.� ��k c r i � k� �s. r ��� ��.+� �"`,t�,-{ �?.f'w �x+,-�
,,�` � .' a. r-ia�ir,r�4. ����,"� -„Yv t�'e.rl�'"Y't t i - � ...s .fi'" ;y ���'��.�h.M1+r� ��, ;+-f�� �:f�+- + �:
��TMy,�,��.�s '•U
,• ��4'��'St��sy}±. i,�Kk�''�F�� z�35A �''" r - .. ��f � '�� + �� �� r�� ���' k�'�
4 ��l y.} 9�iNY.'.���.��,�j�'X^{jYf}.F t/'�''��Y � � � y+Y`� I �� Y ' '�� ..^e �f-:
- � t���P��` ,��,�^a.xa��'`���1��r � - s � ��^ °4��,��'"� � �. �� 1 �'� �a � /.�µ'�'v
1 Fe��Y ���ry���t K'" `�' �T 1 1 � i � � 1 1 ) +d �. �Y ��r�i P{?�
' .�,7. ��� �-a�c�^�f�dt.(���^�f}„ �'�v i �+ '. � � ��i � e'��� ,t �M � -k. _ .r4e Y'E}eT}�7��3 -: 4�
. � �, ,�y��u�y�-.� r`t r+>:x��{fr� �d .�� r x� -+. �'x 3 � . �xv' {tt� �`'Mr�'S.�T"rv *
a ���A< ��'�'fxr� } �,"�� c r a �,7 �� u" {+'r e ,�fii
'� 2*��,.�"7` F �<k S' x r l:� �., t. a - 9�f� ,
� n� F ��T 3 r r�+S �Y,i"a�3 ��:� ,�r�r.y��U, >4 . � r, '�,'',i ►� ��'"" �"i
��l '�3�rr ��' a�s ��`ihK . 2 "? � -i, : e �1 ��1` � t �n�l ,� .., ��a '.tF� a . .
I 3T ��vyyy�Y � �:.N.A k y .fl � f' l Y _: _' L V 3 4,. S �x.7+�� ../ �}, �
F� . �lF3�,��,�.t�f�.�lt��ia1t� Nti� �1SSi..t4k„F'� S i`ni_.+.;. 7.f ! -. ]�t'�'I lCt. LYt 1.'
t'i1 �'"Kl:i 0.b � +4 j, 2 . 1 KrTT` A
s ;�� .r r ie�t k c $t ,�{' �� �`. �" � r F ' k�. 7 r
- y�j �V� Y }�4 .,l ���i� +<.4.E � �)7 M1Y., Lf 5 t 1J k .� 1 .�} �j ..:t
�.{�� A r� "a ���^i r'k�w",,��` t .' 7 � -� 57 ��. � � � �
3r��y �� j '�n d xst��"�1�'`r�a
� � `y 1 4 � �.a��� �+� Nr ; •1r . Nieai'��� ""�.c - �'h�,'L
tr'
�f �2��rn- 1 �'t. � �• r r�.��t; ` ° V �' - }
F�, t J� �
r �� �" yF . .
,`�`� ` - ,
� �� . �'` ' � ,
.�� _. .
• ^ .
. ��,.,(
. - � � �r,�� ;�Fp�, M.�
..±�r� .. ,' . . . . .. . . . .. .. . .. �..,.. dvtJ�j'd.�Wl�{�v�3Y'd�'�i{]I�tl.� QiYH�u�.tll��T!Y�'.�yy�Mi. ��:
, . . . .. . . _.... .. . . �� .
.`� ..... -.
. 1 ��
� . . . ' . � . - . . �'
� g �Fd� ';a:; :
ATTOIWEYSkCOUN5QAR5ATLAW :'� �..
. . FlRSfINTERST1S610WEBND817t a� . � ' �..
� H35EVF,M'EPNTEISlR[EL AlITe3WU �
� � Sherman&Howard L.�.c. o�.���� � 0.� ��5 ! 1,.,,�,
... . - FA7p7C'J�Op2�9B09�110297790U s1'� ...
q \7
oe�trtcocaamosraax.s• .�,t:''. ; - �'�,
. RENO•CAS VBGAS ^,��•.{'.'.••.c
. ' . `+C'JG�O���`�;��/ ' .
Ho,.�aacxn • '?3Rc',^f!Q'��� ✓
p;,�xo;ax�:�sos)sss-aaza
�".�.
y� June 29 1995 �"``�
- - :j ' ' t�`
. `; VIA'i'ELECOPY 970-420.5439 '
t .�- .
- Tim Malloy �
tlssistam Planning Director ��
AsPen-Pitldn County Planning&Zoning Department k.-: � �
. U05 South Galena Street �".
Aspeq Calorado 81611
a
'`- Re: Colorado Conundrum Marble Corporation/Request for Appeal Heazing '�
Case Number. P44-93
. � Dear Tim:
On 7une 23,1995 we submitted to your offce an appeal of the decision to close the '�'
file and tem�inate consideration of Conundcum's land use application, and reqnested a heuing
, pursuant to Pitldn County Land Use Code Section 416. (A copy or our appeal and request for a
heazing is attached.). One inserpretarion of that provision is that such a hearing must be hedd within
15 days af our request for a hearing,that is,by July 10,1995. You and I have temativety scheduled
�'' a meeting for July 6, 1995,at 1:30. Perhaps we can discuss thi issue that time. �' �
i
` � '
<� _
�::i �,
I
_:� :;. Howard . !
<� , cc: Deborah Quinn,Esq. �_• ,.1•
Mr.Richard Shoenfeld
� Christopher Lanq Esq. 'i
} William K.Guest,Esq.
Richard T.Galanits,Esq. �;
�� Mr.Ray Pewtress �
ti�'. �-:
` .�� � _
�' ; ,��� � .
� � i, � `
� ,,
� �1
�
--�.:..,..------- _ _—.��,. 'r�;�
r; ;��
,r�
L '
� + �k`l Y�� �
> , � . .
` �.C;
, . . .
.. : � ' -- _ .
.
, .. , ; . ,; -.
.
;; ,�:
.� . -
�_
� f
, �' •
. . t � J�..�fi .
1 a ':.
\ ` •
�
t
. �, .�. .. .._` � .
'XTY'T � ��� " �. ... . , ..'.. . . _ .. ._ . . . . . . . . . .. .� , � � .
',�`�� � � ' �
„<.
�a,}
�-.�,°H . - . . , . � . _. .. . . ' . _ ... ....�. , �,..__...�._....,,�..�_.�......_.�..��. ,5`�f ,.-..�lt;:,
R"'r ' ��
� t' �r, .�f.
� , _y, r
. �f
� " $-Y_9S '�', ;;
�
' �::`��;w�{�
. •� POSITION STATEMENT '' "?.�:
; 4s •C,
t i' � .
. '!�
To: Pitlon County Board of Commissioners �,��+',�-��
;�i.rs
_ �c'::
From: Cotorado Conundrum Marble Corpora6on ;'��
::.. s.
, ,.;;•: r
� Date: August 9,1995 � ° '"
.�.
� . �;.'_:..
�::
_ Re: Conundrum Marble Quarry y ^�:, :
.. . . '4���'..
� � � .�::...
� - IIIYfOfILLCtl04 '.,.� .
� - r���.�..
' � Colondo Conundrum Marble Corporation fled an application for a Land Use "� �
' � Pertnit in the spring of 1993. Conundrum sought the Permit in order to comply with certain �~a
� County regulations for the operation of an existing marble quazry in the Conundrum valley. `�
_ Conundrum has necessary federal and state-level approvals. On 7une 6,1995,the plannnig office ,��
notified Conundrum of its"termination"of its applicatioa.
The purpose of ttris hearing is ta decide whether Conundrum can conticrue to t
process its application under the Pitkin County Land Use Code as it existed when the appGcation
was first submitted(the 1993 Code),or whether the Couirty can apply the standards and
procedures of new Code(1994)to Conundrum's Application. As stated in its memo for this ; ;�
hearing,the Planning O�ce has decided that the 1994 Code applies,largely on the basis of what it
characterizes as"infomiat,"that is,non-public,criteria. The Planning O�ce has taken no express
position as to whether their decision can be appealed to tlsis Board,but by scheduling this hearing,
� thePlanning Office has implicitly conceded that their decision is subject to apgeal.
'�.�..
• � Cornmdrum urges this board to ovemile the Planning O�ce,and direct it to '
process Conundcum's application under the standards and procedures of the 1993 Code. Most ' .
importantly,on behalf of itseff and a11 future applicants,Commdrum further requests that this �
_�� ;� Board direct the Planning O�ce to process all future appGcations in accordance with public niles M1.
- r, and criteria.
� , ;
a
.� Facts
' After submitting its appGcation for a Pitkin County Land Use Pemut in April of ` � .
i
1993,Conundrum received a comment letter,dated May 23,1993,ceqnesting further infoematioa
i Over five months later,ConundruiA�supplemented its applicatioq on November 15,1993. On
December Z, 1993,the Plazuung Office advised Conundrum that it should a¢ain"revise and �I
; resubmit"the application. � � ,
t�:. �•s
': �t .:
,�, ::,
:,,
. . . . . . . .,�i: .i:
?b i `.
i i
i
: . -..- . _--.
i._.. ,----.,,ww�z;,�.�..-.,°"..`_ . " ...�-�-----^'"'�-.F. s+;:,�%-�"-".�.._:-.,.y«:.....-- ... T�kl .
.. �
...:. , .• -� . - �. �.: � ..
' ��� � ,
` , , .
r .:..
r I
. '•, . /" . . .. .'; ': � . ;_ ' - .� . .. . . � .. . _.y.
. � � . � . ` . .� ` � � ,
-a - , . ,.,. . ' . . .
�
_' -. ., . . " , • � _�; . . . _ . . . �.. _ �"�.
. . . . _ _ . C.';
` : .
. `, '' :�.: ': _ .. . . • . • . ..�. .�__'�, y....'..-- .; . ... . ',`".-..
. . . . . � .. :�, . .. . .
1 ' � • .
1 �
� : . . f .
`�. _... r,,. , -
��"�� k� � . . - ' .
+��
, `',
a _+`'', .rF .
1�
.,� - ..
:.. ,
. `''
,
�o .,r,.��i'� •�Fi4".'�r2h' �W Awr. ^....- ti6 .::q�..�:.:..... .. ...�' _,+.._.-.�_ lY�,tkt'J=�i��.�'�,,�y��'���FT'�4.'���'�Y}'��'��',
, , . .._. .... . U , C.`.
. �
. . ' •�'�^ .:L�,�i
: ����+...�
� On Apri126,1994,Pitkin County adopted a new version of the Land Use Code. ��l �''
� The next day,on Apri127,1994,the County Commissioners signed resolution No.94-68,which �r' •`,
� ��
govemed the question ofwhich Code(the 1993 version or the 1994 version)would apply to
�a�:'.:.,
previously-submitted applications. The Aprii resolution stated that"All active land use ,''':;•z,;
applications that have been submitted by March 16,1994,shall be reviewed pursuant to the `' �•
existing Land Use Code." The resoluuon also provided that applicarions"submitted"from March }�=� -. ;
� ;`;f;�:;:<,:� �.
� 17 to Apri126,1994,coutd be"processed"under either the 1993 Code or the 1994 Code,ai the �,r.��r :.
applicam's discredon. There is no question that Comindcum's application was submitted prior to �;�`''��. `'
. __ _ March 16,1994. ;u.,z. -�.
� � t ti °ce`';.:
However,the Pitldn Planning O$'ice,through their letter of 7une 6,1995,has ' '�'
taken the posi6on that Commdrum's application was not"active"as ofMarch 16,1994. They
reach this determination based on non-public or secret definition ofthe term"ackive,"defning ;y: �.
"active"as"substantially complete and ready for scheduling." The Planning Office has never ": '
� stated this deSnition in writing,not even in its memorandum for this hearing. '�
i During a meeting on July 6, 1995,with Conundrum's representauve, Mr.Malloy, ;°�y
; Ms.Konchar,and Ms.Quinn were asked where such a deSnition appeated in any rule,regulatioq •'��
guideline or othera�ise. Theu response was that the definition is a matter of Planning Office
"custom and practice"and that it was applying this non-published,non-announced"secret" ' '�}
i guideline to Commdtum's applica6on. They admitted that this guideline was being followed
' without notice or opportunity of any kind to be heard. ��
#
Argument '
.1f�
I. CONUNDRUM HAS A VESTED RIGHT TO REVIEW UNDER 1993 CODE.
' The Planning Department's argument that Cornmdnim's application was not
"active"on March 16,1994,is an attempt to manipulate the procedural tules governing this `
I pernrit applicaUon using secret,non-public criteria 'This manipulation of the procedural rules is �`
improper and unlawfW because: �
A �� • the planning office's action is retrospective,arbitrary,and capricious;and ;
...� • �.
under any reasonable interpretation of the County's resolutioq Conundtum is
entided to review under the 1993 Code.
_'.� ,
iAccording to the onEy Colorado Supreme Court decision to directly address the ,`• ,
i issue of,one who applies for a pemrit from a local authority has a vested right ta have that
� application considered under the law in effect when the application is submitted. Denver Buick v. •�t.
C�and Count�+of Demer.347 Bt2d 919(Colo. 1960),overtuled on other issues.Stroud v.Citv ,�.
of Aspen.532 P.2d 720(Colo. 1975),Service Oil Co.v.Rhodus 500 P2d 807(Colo. 1972). ;
i ,; '::s�
_ ! Z ' tM --
I ' ,�
' ' 'i . . .3 � ''.
' I . . . . . ��u„�
'----- —_, __-__,_�_ __.�__y___�._—_ � r
5 1
/, - — rs,v ii ^
. :_ .. ,
� . _ - . . . . �� � ..?; R ��,.i;:.�.
�'�tl
1 ` '
�: `�.,\
. ; ., .'.� .. '.:. . . . ,.. .. . .. �. '. . .. '
�
. .:. .. � � . �.. . . .�.- .i., . ..
. . �1 . . , . . .y,- . . , � .
�� � � . . � .. :,� �r' .. .
. ` i � . - � � . ' i . ;. .
. . .. ' . . -� . �. . . - � - � . _ � .
- ' . �- - � ' l'-.:. . � . - . � � . .. . . . ' � .
r
-- _ :�:
�: • - .
���t"'.� .. � . ' . .
.:_.,., , �
�.+�v ••.•F:'•+:�k, f;1Cia."�Jc. ..:N:e:. * ��- .o_. .�....-.. . _ . . . .�. , . d�.Ce1C.'ivfAY:�' �"3Kh"s:7�4lLata:cY;bVl2"ia r:.5<n,y48'G,.�" i- "*",
.... . . . ..� ... _ .r:.. ..t�. ,
. ' 1� , , ��,; l,`.
�:
� .
� ' - `1
.. �..� �... ry:
��n ..���
ee also,Marshall v.Ciy of Asp�892 P.2d 394(Colo.App.1994),cert.granted,(Colo.April ����"•
10,1995);Grta�iger v.County of Pitkin 794 P.2d 1045(Colo.App. 1990). i'-;. .
,i.,
� _ Denver Buick recognized this right based upon the prohibition against �;-'I`,-y r,
"retrospective"legislation contained in the Colorado ConstituGoa 347 P.2d at 930. Crawford v.
McLaughlin,473 P.2d�25(Colo.1970),held that actions taken in andcipation of issuance of a . s.
' pennit can vest rights in a pe[mit. Saur v.County Com'rs of Lazimer County,525 P.2d 1175 r
'� (CoIo.App.1974)held that seeking other permits is su$cient action to vest rights in a permit � ��-
� In summary,based on the Count}rs reso(ution of Apri127, 1994,Conundrum is �,�s.,:.
�
entitled to processing under the 1993 Code for the following reasons: �.�"" ,
1. Conundcum's applicauon was submitted before March 16,1994.
2. The date identified in the Resolution for assessing the acrive status of an !''.
� application is March 16, 1994. �''
� 3. The term"active"is not a term of art. It must be interpreted according to its piain
:. �
j meaning. ,
�
4. . The Planning Office's definition of"active"as"substantially complete and
scheduled for a heazing"is a secret,non-public definirion. As such it is an abuse of
• authority for the Planning Office to appiy tius definition to Conundrum's vested
rights .
' � 5: Just 3 months before March 16,1994,Cornindivm had received a comment letter �
from the Planning O�ce. The letter allowed Conundrum to"revise and re-submit"
- its applicatioq and gave no deadline in which to do so.
- 6. , The Planning Office did not consider Conundrum's application inactive after its
I first submission in April of 1993,even though more than five months passed a8er
Conundrum received the Planning Office's initial commern letter and before '+ ' .
,�_ � Cornindrum re-submitted its application in November of 1993.
� i 7. There is no basis in the Code for the Planning Office's present assertion that
Conundrum's application was inadive as of March 16, 1994,just because three . i
months had passed since the Planning O�ce's last communication. � i
t .
� � �.�
8. Conundtum never gave any indication to the O�ce that it was abandoning its `
application. In fact,its then attorney met with the o�ce in Aguust,1994 and �
- indicated Conund'A�Sm's desire to go forward.
i
; 4' �1!
� ; 3 �1, "
i ��;:
I . , f,.,
:1 � � ,
�_ _ _ __ - -----4�.
._
,�- - ��
_ _ . . : _
. .
, .. _ . _ . �
y'
1 ��i ,.
�R
1 �. �� 1'` .i� \
` ' �". `
. I _ ... ' :'+.r..1` _ .
1 i �,.
, ,. ; •
- _= _- •-�- < . ;:i"_., , '
�
� `: , , . - . ...
' �: ,
,���,..t . _ _ ' . •
, .
.�- . ,
'>�`�'", . _ ,�
,
, _. _ _�- . _ .
• M „�,;
C�7 . .. .. , �'��}lY(
G��
� . Y t
� . - e �
1 �•
1
{ �*`
' i 9. Throughout this process,and even to the date of this hearing,the Planning Offcce r,e �'
continues to refer to Conundwn's application using the same file mimber,and ����°
never gave any indication that they considered Conundrum's applicarion inactive or �'`ti• °
- abandoned until7une 6,1995. +",.'�
'�"i�:.
� � 10. It is arbitrary for the County to apply the 1993 Code only to"active"applications
� submitted before March 16,1994,while granting a discredonazy choice where -...i:
applicaUons are merely"submitted"between Mazch 17 and Apdt 26,1994. ' ?'
��'r- .
-- - The Planning Office is not free to alter the standards that apply to a petmit ..� :
application by taking secret,unaccouatable ac6on Under the!aw of Colorado,nothing else t6an ,�:: :
2he time of the initiai appiicarion is deYerminative of the rights of the applicant. Marshall•892
P.2d at 397.
II. TI�COUNTY'S ROLE IS LIlI�IITED TO MAKING REASONABLE
REGULATIONS THAT SLTPPLEMENT,NOT CONFLICT W1TI� ;:'
FEDE1tAI.LAW. i '�":
As well as invading Conundrum's vesied rights,the 1994 Code is preempted by �
federal Iaw. This is because,in enacting the 1994 Code,the County has brought itself into direct �
' conflict with federal policies that protect Conundnun's vested,patented rights in the quarry. The
� 1994 Code conflicts with federal protectian of Cornindcum's rights because: �
• the 1994 Code pucports to regulate land usc in a federal Wddemess area,which is �
atready directly regu(ated by the federa(govemment;and !
• the 1994 Code is so burdensome and unreasonable that it makes operarion of the �
`; ; quazry commercially impracticable. �
!`
; The County cannot bring itself into conflict with federal law. Any state law,if it i.
` � conflicts with fedecal law,is void. U. .C nst,art,VI,cl.2; Rav v.Atlantic Richfield Co 435
U.S.15 i(1978). A conflict between state law and federai law azises whenever the state law
"stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full pwposes and objectives of �
T�___�_ Congress." Brubaker v.Board of Countv Com'rs 652 P.2d 1050, 1055(Colo. 1982); Ei'ines v. �
� � Davidowitz 312 U.S,52 (1941);Silkwood v.Kerr-McGee Cor� 464 U.S.238(1984)_ Pitldn ;
County has no power to act en a way that makes the County an obstacle to the purposes of i
Congress. ' �
- ;
In this case the Counry must accommodate Congress'purpose to protect eadsting � �i
private rights that predated Wilderness designation. Conundcum presently enjoys such rights. In �
j crea t i ng t he fe d e r a l W i l derness A t�e s,Congress mandated that ihe preservation offederal
� wilderness would not be accomplished by sacrificing the rights of people whose claims to the i
� land predated lhat of the federal government. Indee�the Wilderness Act itself makes the
�:y.
��'y
" 4 i .:
�..
�;�:
S;,
� �,':.:
- - �---- --__ ---�-;�,�,��
, f .�� ,�
--. _. �t +
- . ; t� ;
� � �, t `
� �-; .
; , , .
, _ _ ., - :4 .
�
�.
� _ ,, ,
� ,
_ � , .
_ _ .r .I
� . Y� , <
�
..,r. " . -� �
�.��
.: , . ..
.�;::. •� .
. , ---_ _...-�-- -- -.,
_ _ _. . ,_,,,.�;.
�� .� " ,�I'����
{ '. .�,
1 �` :
: � protection of wilderness"subject to"such existing rights. 16 U.S.C.§1133(c). The Wilderness � ;:..��'
�=•' .�'
I Act fiirther contains specific provisions pratecting the development of e�risting mining claims. 16 � '
n '
i :�
� U.S.C.§1133(d). Moreover,the Wildemess Act guaru�tces Conundrum"such rights as may be '' ,;��`
necessary to assure adeqaate access"to the quarry. 16 U.S.C.§1134(a). The Forest Seivice has
stated that because Cornmdrum's claims are patented,"outstanding"claims,the quazry must be �'��;�i,�
allowed to go forward unimpeded.' The County cannot bring itseif imo conflict with any of these
objecqves. `,-, %:�..
4��'.: r
The Count�s proper role in regulating the quarry is limited by Brubaker and K 7 `
__- :___; Califamia Coastal Com'n v.Grazute Rock Co..480 U.S.572(198'n. In GraniteRock.the ���`;``'
Supreme Court affirmed that a county government can play a role in regulating mining ope.ratians "�" �
�-�,:,. :
on federal land—a role,consistent with Brubaker.which is limited to regu(ating emironmental `<`�: -
impacts of federally-approved land uses,but which does not include the power ta regulate land ,; �'",
; use direct(y. Id.at 587.2 ,�
; There is no question that the 1994 Code purports to regulate land use. This f�
purpose is readily appazent&om the following examples: °j
1. §3-2404(D)disallows land uses which"substantially iajure or detract fram the
lawfully existing or permitted uses of neighboring properties." This provision is ,"
identical to the grounds asserted for denial of the permit in Brubaker held to be an �
abuse of authority. '
2. §3-2404(A)and(B)prohibit mining operations within 200 feet of a public road or
stream. These provisions regulate land use directty and cannot apply to -
Cornindtum's application.
3. §3-2405(G)prohibits"adverse impacts to any environmental system such as
' �� aquifers,landslide or avalanche prone areas,flood plains,riparian areas,or wildlife
j
� 1The Pitkin County Code asserts that"patented lands aze to be treated as any other ', ,
private property and aze not subject to the preempuon ofFederal mining taws." §3-2403(B). � `
:.�_ � This asse�tion is contrary to preemption case law and federal statute. It ignores the established
-:--,— principle that exemption&om regulation at the federal level can be an indication of Congressional ;;
intent to allow the activity to proceed without regulatioa Atlantic Richfield.435 U.S.I51. ,
- _ i ZRecendy,the State District Court for Pitkin County applied Granite Rock to
' � loc�l, unpatented mining claims. According to the court,the legitimate role of the County was -
limited to regulating impacts that occur outside of the Federal lands:including air quality,water
discharge,and road use. Board of.�ouny Com'rs.Pitkin Count,�v.Conqd�No.92 CV 147
(District Court,Pitkin County,Sept.4, 1992). Since the impact of Conund�um's quazry is
practically nonexistent outside the federal lands,the role to be played by the County in regulating �
the quazry shouid be correspondingly sma1L ` _
,.� ,�_i
+ 5 4
� ;: �:,_
i; �
; ,;; :
------ - - ,- -- --- --— »,�¢-,�
� ���
� - , . �, , ;y
� ; _ � _ . _ �'
��-` ,
_ ��' 1
`, ,�
. � . �- " � . . . . ���
, . ..�� . . .. . � . .. .
1 . . . � . . . ' . �.1 " '� . . . . .
\ ; . .. . _ . I . . . . . - .
- �' :. � :._:'; -.. .. •. . . . . . . .. . . .. � . . t .
. .,. � � . . .--� .. �' . .. . . . .._. � . . .. . �
�: : � �: ' . . . � � ..� � � .. � ." � . . . .• .
ki'� ���V?,.•.2. � . . . . � .. , . . . .. , � � . . ' . � �,
• , , .�
, ;�, . . .. � � .
`'�.�'. � . , . " �
., , � . ;:r.;r. �:,
' ::c,�,.�.�'i,
F , .
G,'�'
�}.i '_.
habitat of significance to the County,region,or nation" Because azry quanying ; �14t�
� activity wili have some adverse impact on some em+ironmemal system,somewhere, � �`�
this regutation goes too far in resuicting ei►vironmental impacts,and is really just �)'� �., ..
_ I an attempt to direcily regulate land use. 1::�;,'!�
�'`,•'.;i,+
� Granite Rocic also prohibits the County from regulating in a way that undecmine's .
the comtnercial viability of the quazry. Granite Rock stated that"the line between[permissible] �`
eavironmental regulation and[not pernussible]land use planning will not always be bright." Id. �s�� -• r
As a specific example of state-level action that crosses this line,the court cited"a state. ��`�' '
�,r�,.:�,7.�:
___ _ _ environmentai regutation so severe that a particulaz land use would become commercia(ty >�
im racticable." Id at 587. This means that even when the Coun �s r ` � �.
p ty' egulating environmenta( ;, ^� «
impacts,the County must take into account the effect of those regularions on the comrxercial :-+`'`�
_ viability of the psoject. The County cannot practice a reguiatory policy of"death by a thousand
i�� .
� � CIlt3.° .
q
�' The 1994 Code is preempted because,individually and cumulatively,its provisions ?3
i mafce the quazry commercially impracticable,and are enacted to indirect(y decry Commdcum's � �
� vested right to opecate the quazry. This purpose is evident from the following examples: �a-
1. §3-2410 requires a performance bond covering the full costs of compliance with �,
the code. This provisioa places no time limit on Courny to re(ease the bond,and �.`�
` I thus subjects Conundcum to contingent liability of indefinite duratioa
. �
2. §4-604(B)and(C)permit the County to limit Conundrum to a short-term pennit �,
that aliows operation of the quarry for no longer than 5 years. This is
commercially prolubiGve because it may require five years for the operation to 3 •
begin to turn a profit,and Conundrum cannot plan on its extension appGcarion
� . being granted for a longer period.
,i
3. §4604(Ii)(4)imposes the costs of viotation hearings upon the operator without •
- ; regard to whether the operator is found to be in compliance or non-compliance � .
with the conditions of tne permit. Since any member of the public who is �
"� � " eved"b a utative"violation"can force a hearin this ovision sub'ects '
� � Y P S. P� J ' '
�, � Conundrum to unlimited costs no matter how perfect iu compliance with the terms °
- --; of its permit t
i:
4. §4-604(I�(5)(b)and(c)allow the County to revoke the pernvt and choose not to � �k
- reinstate it,even after the quarry is brought back into wmpliance with the tecros of
the pernut,for up to a year. Because this enables the County to deny Cocwndrum
to mine even after compliance with environmental regulations,it exceeds the scope �
of the County's aut,{}ority and is preempted. Moreover,the possibiliry of a yea�s
interrupuon is commercially protu'bitive.
-?
; ' n::
��_,
� 6 ��:
. :i
,,,
, :
- - �� -- -----,��.W.:.�...------- -- ��g�;J
, � k,
i' - _ '�
.. : . . � � 1 � }�t� '�.
. . . . . . '�'�; i
1 '., , _ ..:1,
� i . - . . . � _ �> _ . .
. \. .i . . � . ' . . 1': . � ' .
" . . , _ . , . ' _.. . . . � • . , � .. .���. .
.. .. .. ._,. ._. �� . �..:__ .; , >�I�.._;-: . ' . � �. .. � .�
�: .. � . . .. ' .. ". .. . . _.. _. � . . '
��� .' _... . . . . ,. . � � . .. � ' . � . .. . . .
��. ,
a ;:.. � • , .� .� � � ¢ . ++ ���,�,� " Cyn"5� h`^• �'";.
. . �,,,j��y �-)_�� �1 ,��'.�g,-q�._ yy
. e�y����/�'��.��
� .r��'.��i��7��-r�Jy��..�.,7Ml�:a".kJf::�_&_..'e�_;�:. ...........�{��...711�, ..�a`n.en�s.'.""�L:�uYtl�.�� �9A! L ���i/'.'1'�
:� GLYiffi4%+ � .
. . . . . , ��i. A.
�' - t � � ,R�S)
1 5. §3-2407 calls for rehabilitadon for azry project regard(ess of the existence of 1;.�"�=:�:
F.,:
fedecal or state requirements. The State Mued Land Reclamation Divisioa +. r.,
� �:;:,..;�,
supervises such activities,as does the U.S.Forest seivice. If not pr�emptcd,this
activity is at best duplicative and ov�reaching. by•�'ti,:,t.'
�5.: ' .
" The c.wnulative effect of these regulations is to deiry the very acrivity Conundn�m 4` ,:
i seeks to engage in. Under Denartment of Health v.The I�t7L 887 P.2d 993(Colo.1994),such '����;<�: r
� action is not only compensablq subjeciicig the County to liability for damages,but also pmlu'bitcd ��'
_-:-._I in the f rst instance. This is because the Wilderness Act pralu'bits imol�mtary taldngs of private `.',r :'
! pmpaty within the Wdderness Areas absent special Congressional authorization I6 U S.C.§
' � 1134(c). The County cannot circumvent these requiranents tl�rough heavy-handed,burdensome �*,�i'>'�.
i regutatiun. �,
;_'�
• `�1.
��:
,.
,.�_
'_�;
Conclasion
, ��
. All of these issues,the pre-emption doctrine,the taking issues,tke abusive and
ecoaomically disruptive regulations,demonstrate one overriding purpose—to cause any
wutroversial project such headaches and problems that the mere cost of attempting to
comply will be probibitive. The cumulative effects on Commdnun of these provisions,and °
the attempt by the Planning Office to impose them retrospectively,is"death by a thousand �''`
cuis." The Coumy has no authority to abuse vested rights or to supersede federal and
state requirements.
Conundrum therefore urges tlris Board to ovemile the decision by the Planning
Office,and direct the Planning Off'ice to process Conundrum's application according to �
the standazds and procedures of the 1993 Code. This result is diatated by tfie Calorado
� constitution,by fundamental faimess,and by preemgtion doctrines. Most importantly, ♦
�; ; Conundrum objects to the Planning Office's use of non-public,secret criteria in applying F
�: i tivs Board's resolutions. On behalf of itself and all future applicants to this Board,
Conundnun fiuthec requests that the Baard direct tt►e Planning Offce make its tules and ���
operating criteria public. •!
, �.
j i-' .
' i _
` ,� . ��
�. .� � � . . . . �a':
.. .. . . . , . . - . . � � � . . -.1 ���1
- . � � � � `S 1.
'��
r�
. . . . . . . ' . -. . �_ ���.
. . � � . . � � ' � - . . . [' � V
.. . � . . .. ' �� � �.
�
, d
1_
`. �
..: . .__ ' ' -
Mr
,
/ ' `"'�x
. . .�. .. + .._ M1..
�s.�i
� �
� f
1� �� �+.
�. ' ..► . _ ..,� �
;,t:
- � _.
, ._ . ..,. .��_ �-:.: . ,�.
.
. � f. .- �..., , � , . . . -_.., .,.: ,..'.
j _ .':: ��:.: . .;, .
\ . ' . '.-1,Y .
, l � � . � . " . � • .
. � ' � ';L._ ' —- � , -
� � �; ., . � .. � � : _ . . � .
t��� .
o.: ,
,,b. . �
:�e
. "ti�:i- �:�E;, :n..... ...... - . . ' ^ ...�.. .......... ...�.....,.�.._�. ....... ..,...,,.... _.�.�
,��.� ��1 � r .,1�.
. 1 • . _ � ��'�`:
� . ���• ���� ��� .S}.;'.
' Box ls i�
_ Aspcn,Colc�raclo •
'::;�•
� � 1 A\D�l� Q�� 1�U�l�1CL�1r111�1V
• � � STAI'E OP COLOKADO) �: r
_ � )ss. Co�,y o(Nolice �:.
�
� County of Pitkin ) R�� t�c( R�� g���.
�'? �.�g �.
t t,Loreu Jenkins cio solemnly sw� �� �
`.; Yublishero(7'IIGASPCN'1'1MG5:t6a11
�� I news ��er rinled,in,tvl�ule ar in • t,'
a; Y P�{ i' 1�
E�' in q�e Cotnily of I'ilkin,Sl�le u[Colora FOR SA�E OR TRADE SOOO s.}.5&, NAPLES FLORIDA CONDO
ernl clrculaUon lhereln;Uial snid ne+ 3,SBa Spanlab Colontal home,on nlshed 2br!2ba!carport,ovei Y.
ublished contittuoas! ai�d tu�lnlc �ake,Baton Rouge,LA's most ex- golf course; 10 minutee";
� N y dusive nelghbwhood.Vlmlte amcco heaches. Ssi,900. (303)43$
Counly uf Pilkin,(or a period nf more W�red tue rom.Numerous endoaed (2s�tcc)
� � �� SecuUve weeks next prior(o U�e(itsl� eouAyards w/extensiva landscap- NEW HOME In Cerbondab 423- �
- " aqnexed legil nolice or aclve�llseinenl, �ng.Enhre beckslde;glass which �pat�� ,���
� per has been ndnd8ed lo llic Unilecl: over�ooks pool, 2 decks, bass ��,�p�� ���
ond dass niiller wider lhe �YOVlslons i g��ed lake.BeauQful country sel- a�beaement,vaulted ce�l�ng
� . dng.easy Interstate secess-Bafon floors: �270,000..863-9809:-;, .
. 3,1879,or any nmendmenls Iliercof,a Rougs or New Odeans. Vawe: ys���.
paper is a a�veekly ne�vspaper duly qi� Ssoo,000:Trade for equal or near ; ,
°�'; in le �I noUces nnel ndvertisemenls���ue home.in Aspen,BasaM.Snow- New UsUng! ,
6 B maas,Cerbortdele:(504)788-2351;
Ihe I�ws ot lhe S(�le o(Coloraila. � M�yqMTumer�,pq�g26.ppy�, potenual galoiel. Horsea`ol ,
' - GREAT•LOCALS Unit el Pidcin Place. �5 acres, near�new hdi �
. Thaf the nnnexed legal noUce or ndvei 28q,tea,upper comer sunounded ���• " ;
lished L�Ihe regular and enlire Issue i by greenbeit/opan space.Vory�ow '
�,; said Weckly newspaper fot llie period assessmenta..Good vtews antl eztra �Na���►Yt�
' '?y 'tive insertbns;and tl�at the fiisl j�ubll� c���,��'s�oo.Pdn- Less + �_ ,G�
, was In Ihe issue o[ salcl n� CoMemporerytownhome,s6 �.,�
� _�;�v�A.D.,19�` _ au HIS70AIC TOWN OF from utt t-a SwS,ono.
f': licalion of sai nollce was In Ilie issue 7ELLURIDE,COLORADO �;
dalecl A.D.,19?ls _ ����9 .:�
F:�? . �3763 sq:R,of pure�hntury on just. . ProPerHes.- ,
' wider fax tawn b1s.Thls 3BA�3 �. � . ��-'820-1500... ��. ; �
, ,1I�a.brlck estete Is defeNetl wlW � - 1 � �
.'� f:j:' marWe,Ilmesione,Brazfllan ch�- .(6l18th251fc). � �._�7 .
. ..- c� .rywoal end Sllvertnaple.Induded � . .� .. �.
�� `. �s a brbk courtyard�tw}o car-e- -. NeYV M9XICO:�IOU111Hk
" Subscrlbed and swbrn to before me, a »olary 1'�� AeresgeforSele �
public In and[or the Cowil of Pitkln,Sl�le o[Coloiido. I tar a«e rnamfaln tract:boa
• on llds ay. day of � A.D.,19�,�_• -gt LFJL In the SacramBMO MounleMe .
' '000'06. SouUieastem New-�Me�dw,�(d � y.
� -�N � puldoso and Ruldoso Dorin � .
�3 � r . ,�-eiN'B8� fiome of ihe.world's rkhe&ho
Nolary 1'ubliC g•bs OZ race, the ALL ANEqICi
My connnisslon erpires 'e("�FS- e�e?eM FUiU�tITYt ThIs property k N
. . � . i. �uo17?�i ponderosa pine forest at en,-�:e
� ' ' . .vatbn d 7680 feet k Is bdni
�•d14 f' ; •4tS5-1 by tAe Llncoln NaUonal�Fari
. �L, .... � . �; �.� � and atforCS a megMlkent v6ew
� �12.000 toot hlgh.Slerra Blani
� F'4°�.� l,�' � ��� 8�iyuuni� �Level, year-round acceasi�
; �.�"r� �CU � ,j �: s,puno�� a�atlable through'the MaNb) ,p.�� �F�
� � � u{r•f' � . .-pene.e Farest.One oi New Mexlc� r r S
c� i •�gei�-. "Prem�er sId�esars�..5k1 Apac! :r
� p�.,.�- �... � �� ' � ..Is anly eleven:mUea dista�t`,T. i'.
/�. , i �. ! Aroperry has gentle slopes q � i°.
+ ` ;"a e hes a�d�ofce m-several excelh
, �.��� ..resldentWl:buildMg�sqes.-�Il:cui � .
. ' ��.��.� �
' ..�.,,.LL_,:_.,�.___._ ' �-. . also.be used�tor eommarrJai.i
�:��.._.._. -- ..�.._,.. .�._ _ � „1�,r;
/ . �
0
.-. _ _ r' :
- `�.
, �
`. ., . . .
- . � �
� . ,
;��ir:.� .
� �;;
i�COLOltAUO)
)S�. G��,y uf Nv(ice ^
PUBIICt� °�°• dth4�»1ckMtltAerWtMldbwin`�ctbm:yt� .
l IY O�I�II IC{Il � AN URDINANCE OP THE 80ARD OF COUN7Y ��w1ul n$a1�.5maYJn�4 P�IMIM and u (a)Senriny nollee reqWAng mrr tlon W�ny'n�.M �-0�,
COMM13510NER5 OP%TKIN COONTY,C04 Wbllc�rn�ol reull a1orc�, NdNlon ol tA1a ar�kla t�
ORA00.QGC7q�p A tRW MifCIP V.i117E ��InQ H���Y�tora.m1M aervlce adb @)FequstMS tM County Atlomty b Mlt4 � t
Iil/AIR POLLUTION R6GULATIONS OF THE �vhmenu,reldi lood produalon atabllaA- ate a proprlale enlorcemeM proceedlnys, � � '(.��
nkins do soirinnly stve�r Il�nl ! aui Ihc wnaNCOUrmmut.roeeKnowNwv-na �w.+�aaNaWme. m�mw�.nnwiu�nai«��m�imi�.rona. -.:, F�,;•;�;
rnw�v cair�r c�wn�rr000a urt Acr.m m)rinN.�w Mad�aw. �w,eW�w w.n�ao.nbn a vmww w mpA,� �
�C A$�'IiN'i1�11i5:Uiat Il�e s�me i;:1 N�CC�:• ONTROL AND i]MR THE SMOKINU OF ��T�1°+����Mo�Nm.Smoklntbpw, pve re11U,�b�temmq or olhu�DC�opdate r��;.'..��.�i'.�>;�.
qpgACCp pg ANy pTMFR N�OR PLIM�w hlbiled�n ell IheNro or nllMclub�euepl �cfbn lo prerml.en�oln.a6ile a rmiwe�u�h k„ :.`._•.
�+rinletl��Il�tV�IO+C OY��I�111'�,lOt��r11����.��C<� INUOOR PUBLIC PLACES AND PLACES OF wbmldneireu�etllvplvslehnctbns, vloWba .
EMPIAYMENf AS SET iDRTH fliERfJN:PRG Sec.S-1.ReeWallw�ol Smotlni In P4ce�ol See.&7.7 My yvson Nolrilni th�ordlnsMe �.�.'..
(�������C�1lr SI�IC(7(CVIUf:I[In,Al1tI I1�5 A CII- FmploymrnL �hN.�pan�pnNClbRbeP�I�hedbyaMeof �
�� SCRIBINO PFNALTFS AND REMmIFS FOR 7HE Thc lolbwl ,�'! �
Il Uieretn;(�1:7�581c� ItCIVS't;1��C1'�1.15(�CCII �w'�ONTi1ERE0E n7repulatlons�pply�oplacnN mmae�banlhreehundrMdoll�n(f3pp,qp), '.`.'
nUntwusl nnd tu�hilcrru�Iedl in sald I.TheBoardWC�nl Commbslonenol c+i�hM���r� a�n��r«n,Ka,uw IromKn�nteolfwqendmaybeeo�Wned �q'q- �,�
Y+ my furtha ar tonUnued No1Nbn thttcoL
111��OC 8�7CfI0(I tl�IIIOfC III�1�IIIy I tV()Cllll• �tldn CouolY Mds IMl the smoldn�of lobx- ��rnoluNOn each emplo7u'�hsll adoAt, fxb day sny vlolatbn d Ihb nikk sb�p cpp. �' . - �,`,
m.w my other weeE ar plm4��lorm d dr �Plemrnl.�M m�Hi1W a wAtlm smo4NQ pnL. Ilnue�h�ll conatltute a�ep�nte ollense.In �.
s next prlor lo Ihe(irsl publitalion af 1he PolluUon,�podtive deneer la heellh mtl• Iq whkA shaY eo�bin al�minlm�m�iw. .am�ro��o«��.uw..�rworuo„��M, ;s:.. . .•.
er .r
maferiaf�nnoyanc4 Inmmmimee,nuWncq �°� �dln+na nuY be ml��m abqed br Ipe ' .i�.
I1b��CC Of i1C�VFf�j5CI11C11����lt�Sl�[��1CtV5�n• aixomion.�a,n�.imnw.e�omo.ewno C�)�°111onqsmaensNemqoy�,wn. BWrddCounlyCwnmlulonn�Ey�pp�opr�N� ' .
ue Mnent N moMed apaen:end kraiee md meetl^i k8d acllon. � :
rII111II C[I IO II1C U17IIClI SIAICS It1:lII5:IS.•.CC- S.Sdmtlllc Mdenee i�lufa 1h�t•secon6. �^��.�srown�,audltorluma,ratroom., Sec.5S6 My remedka ProvMed im 6erelo � . . .
r undcr lhe �covisluns uf Ihc/1d v(�•larrh n.^d imotr'4 M1umlul to Ihe M1eaM�of nar .��aod i,nmk.,n,n..,r•.���no..,,�a n.n xNm�i,�n.�.�w„w Qa�w�.,,n.n.n !=�
� �maken and the Envlrommental Protec�loe �^dx^'k°�'O°��m. be M addWOn�o�nyolAer rnoedln p�wW�d .
�fI1Ctl(�tl1CI1�5(�ICI'CO��FIII(I I11�I5:11[I IICIVS- Age�cyha�cl�eqOed�a6¢rnsmotea.• C9ProrlsbnandouMtewceolno�mokluy bylaw. .
Croup A cudnoym.In�he same utegory u ue°�^���•�'^�YO°^u��PbY� ��2 %.,
eklyne�vspaperdulyqu�lificdfur�,ubli.l�- en,:�rc«....mc,oa IoungnthalNfMWeIYP*��asmokciree Theregula[IOma�M�mendmenb�StbrthM �:'.��
5 1�1Q BC�VCf�I5C111P11�5 lVf��l��1C InC011111'n� �•T�'e Bwrd olCauMyCammlulortend WronmenUa�w�unwldny plqea, 1M14 resolutlon shall become ellective thlny� ,
I N1lin Couo�y denm It�o be In t6e best Inte'el � ��"1�""P�Y��^�P��a�W�ml (�OJ d�ys dev the Wte d pubik�lbn aNer Ilotl . .
5���C U�CO�Of:I(�O. of the Counry,u�d Its.rnWenb an0 WHOn.to �+�1 be Qvrn lhe rIQM to dpl@We Ak w hu p�x�ae Thb rpolutlon wIN apply in Ihe uNo- • '.:;r' :
camroi�nd IIm11 the smoWug ol tob�cco.or �k erea aa a nansmotlng arc�and w post It mrpwatM arcu ol Pukin Comdy,end ,�.�.
My weM or PVM.M1 publle plaetl Md plecp t�h ePVroprla�e a�gn.or a18n.The pol�cy Seclldl$ .
of empbyment.and m mact a new ArtMk V. +aopled.br the anpbyer aha111Miude s ddNF 11 anY aectlon.�u6secllan.�enlme�,Nawe,
ed!e �!nulicc vt adverliscincul ivas pub- ����fly,�,eau�no�a�.a��.w m�rx�� s�.v�• v -
� tlon otlhe term'workare�'rhich hrefe or portbn d Ihb rooWtlan p Iw anY� ;,�C. .
gular and enUrc Isstte u(ever�uumbcr of Couniy Code ta 6e known commoniy a 1he «�uai�o�ia�.,uo��o��.mot�,..no�. «..�n�ia i�.,ua o.�ro�.ui�uo�.i m, .7..
� 'PIINnCounryClanUMrorAlrAct'. �m tl�employeeshellherequlredlamtcor murtdeompelmll�dkllon.�uepp�bo
wsp��er for lhe period o(�_coitsecct- rmw.n�cefvrs�ae rc oxn,unEO sr� k��+�a.�+h.. ,nvi n�aKm�a„�,�a w�mn,,,e� "
( v
Bovd o1 County Cammleslonen of Pittln Coun CU I�+oy 04pute arlsing In�Ae work plxe pendml proWlan ud thetl nal atlect Ihe vallb
and llial lhe(irsl jnibiiealion cdsaiel nolice y.cwo�.a„n.esau�irn.c�i��n�u.rw. undatM1e�moklnapdky.lAe.IQhbofthena� IryoltM1ercm�lNnBP�rtlmlhereaL
° amokcdWl be ven edmee MTRODURU,FlRtt READ,AND Sk7 FOR ��
issue o( sald ne�vspnper d;iled �0on'��,�m,,.dm<wetmc«�mYCman 5 � r� �:��
haeDy eme�ed by�ddM�a ircw MkkV,�o ()F+KP�where aher• requlreQ, PUBLIC HEARR70 AT THE RECUUR M4TNG �'���.
A.IJ.,79_�_ �nil Ihnl lhe I�sl��III�- re.du Idlowa: �m�cm6Nng b prohlblled.conaplcuou� ON 7!�12TN MY OFJULY.1995.N0710E pF +
'ARTICIF V'SNOKINC M PI78lJC PGCfS iy^6���pp6�Qd fOSlating PUBLIC HEARINC PUBLLSNED W 77{g�$p�
IIOIICC WdS IIl II1C ISSIIC U�SII(I I1CL\'Sf1�I1C1' iWppL,�CF50FFlAPI.OYMFNI' N)'��°�1P��Y�h+��bernmmunka4 17MESON7HEDAYOF-,I995.APpROVFD. �i•' .
A.D.,19 sK so.snon n�k �a�o.n�m�oyM.w��m�m.n.«�.o�m u+n�ooereo�en s�corm n�nmc aao
�-' � Tfile artfck.haM hrlmown n�M It m�y be �d°1Kb°��^d permanmlly po�ted In s prom4 PUBIIC F�AWNO7NE-iH DAY OF--,l9%.
' clted u the'PI�Mn Counly Ciean Indoor Alr �P�� N1��Nm AFIFR MOPPN7N IN Tl�ASPFN
�y'. (c)qolMtAa�aiMl��hepwblon�dsuWec- 'fIMFSON77�-7NpAYOF-.1995. ��.'
. See SI.i<gidaelve Mtmt md Purposn. Uon(Q d thls sallm,every emplqer shaq A7'I'6T:Jeanette lami . � �.:�f,
� TheBwrdolCount Commisslonentlnds �'2tlie�Mtoderlp�uteamplaeeolempby. �BOARDOFCOUNfYCOAUfISSIONEpS
eM1atthesowYingdbtiKCO.oruryrotAerwad menta��nansmoqn8ara . _ OFPn7CMCOUNTY.001ARA00 �•'�i.
� m PYn�h e form d Yr paltutbn.�m�terld ����loo Is ml Intmded ta reyuWe , Mkhd C 4NeM.(7w�qyo �:.,
�nnoyanee,t�rconvenlmce,nubance,Aqcoio- smokbq In the following plun wda Ihe(04 Detc- �
bn md a Aeallh huarA lo Nou w�o are pre IoaMyaadllbna: ' � Publlshed M Th Npen 71mes Juty.'K,1995. � A�
srnt h�coall�d spsea.and In ordv ro urve (p Ayrhue roidence whlch m�Y aerve u�kk ._LL,„_--.
ud sworn lo be(ore me, n nol�r� puDllehWlqaalely�nd�veOarctAedeclarM WMd�nbr^��. -p `.,�, t �.
� purpoae of lhls anlcle b to eearol and IIMI Cn A �d eroploy�nmt whlch b prMl, ;)
p o nm
or lhe Co�u�l af I'ilkl��,5!i!e vf Colur�do, u�.motmaormn+�m,a..�r�aornwa. �"°��"�N�'tl1��"a`rc"���1e° •
�n wW�e W+eas uM pYe ot empoymm�n �to the aW�da accupled arhuWe M�.�mok- .
dayof � A.D.,19��_. n��wue,a�onn.n�m.�ew�„�qeom. �aW�+m..�n.mo�e�e�v� � a
�mbdmten MIe11d+th/t the rqtrletbns md wblled by IIrc manMi w by olhv Yw.ord4 . �
pmlt�tloe�olth1au11ckbevlewnlssetlNawm �w�cearieWWbn. � .
aand�rd�,and ehould am 6e eautrued n Y� Ce)M mPloyer ad�ll pesl`No Smotlnp`
Nolary Public u""�a w�k""'n�a.oni�a�a ��� �'�a�:a�.m�,��' . ���
Y I 'r!_rl� .m��uwrau�iw`�i���oa�. eni�a..aau,�a,�.. .
M ronunissloiz ex rLrs s�sa.rwu�asq�.. �
SeeS20e9nRbes.� To Wrlae aow o11he euslence ol'NO �
. .��im�med4te lontlon In hoN of a���8� Sm �m'�SmoN PamlttM'ueu,ayro .
not mceNlat beyond eM1e+w am�d�'d M� �M In Ne Frgllah languye a fo4 �
duln or�wol�.�nd h no evmt grcalv IMo lowe - '
. three(�leel beriM tne permanenl hv.7Te Mtt�wbllc Wscn wM1eie m�moldng N per- �
- � -bu mmt he W��N derotM m wNng dco- pu�wnt lo tAk arnck.a aip�wN6 Ne .1�.
-� 1WIC6eoeoyesandwllhlnwhleh.tFe�ervlmd wora�T/eg�ptln(uW/mtAelntemWonal -
- ..lood 4 only IneldmW lo IAe coosumqlon d no amtlng srmbol sh�fl be coosplenousy . ,
. .�n b�oa�.u�no�qn u,�re.w�..a a.r vw�•a dm�.o�di ounik eno-m«.o�in. `� z
�-eonWn�Gr.tha bv vea'sA�tl nat include .V�Ubn rlewly vis161e on mtry Wn Me nub .
��the�re.tawan4dlnl�y un.The PUtlo Cou�' U�hmmL. �t� .
'Ba�rd /CYY11f7 COTMI�IlOANI(u!t� @)b P��W�<a wAerc eerh�n�ueu arc
� :dd8iroe)maY artmd Uw'bar�rea:to enmm� d°6��n�mdMt arees W*.uant to Ws
pu��IvBc ue�uWn a demon+lwlbn by Ipe rao�utlm�tLe.wmrtM•No Smotln`EtteW �
awnud�nestWlWunmtttut�urhxnbq!' MDp1�NedMw'shillbeeaa�pcuously
• mvily AevatM b the avNng ol aleMd�e 6ew P�1d Y a pMllbn elea�ip W�LIe at Rach end '�
eragn�(�ueh u a bar mom.coclRall lounge a' °�P.�Y�o tlro es�+b�lY�m°^�.N WdNlon.
sMiler WdNry)eM tAe�ervlce d l000 4 onl)' �Y?�o�h.vm8 tl�e�meoAry'lo mwK ane :
........._... ' '" -...:_..� . Inddmtal lo the rn�wmP�bn-W�uch bertr- mnYN.�nY w AnVn��W u�aaiumatl�[
- ..'-�.^.._•....-,�. �... .. _ PunwnllOtl�kMkipilMOpwlwcaute , '-
� ry)"mnlne,.e;mwu.nY a,cwee,.e. a be poeea ana pmmmrneH auW+r�.ana .
� ' �onUlning�eountttorteblesuponwblc� slWi�mtlnWnRb�sl�s�nromPWr ,�
meeb ue xrveA.:. �. � wa knllona wMNn f W arw.All aueA slpu �.
. ��)„Public d�'��^!°�,���0���O . hall deulr wd enotpleuously rttlte tAe� �.. .
� ` wM1leh the Pu61k b ImrltM or In whkh the Vob Phn�e'No SuoNn6��ndlor me tlrc Ntema- ..
. Ile 1a permlued.Inel�din&'bul rot INnIIM ta- uO^'�°O°^^�^8 Hmb^l'R�e�Igro anell be ,-��
t WN�+.eduutbn 6c16�W AesNh 4UWn.hor P�ed nat las llw 5 beet�have IAe Omr m =r . �
� pi�ela.N11a,lheala.wdltoAun.Wb4t truir..�morc�Hn B f«t a6owe tloor kvd uM ilWl be .
port�Non Iac1UHn,reeeptbn�reu,foC41n. °��W�^�OY1^�°����0°to e�use the .
� � � laad eervleeu�aW6nmmU,re�.tl ito a,reWl ^�+�ol n kau ooe W Ne aV�u ro be ciur• � '��:.
�
i �uvlce n1aW1a4mmb.Dlieriw.W waiting . I�o the�ehbl�bh�mmf, rcadebb(rom mrh ue� . .1.;;
Cd1 9moMu�'mmu the com6uaHa�d uq Sx54Fxeplbaa. . .
clyr.clquHta OW�.w ilmllv anlcl4�ny � SeG 56.1.'No Smotln6�areu u<DO/ �:�� .
;� .�r�o�n d�o6.cm o.mM.Wmw.uae,�a na�.+�uw�en mer ue a�au+4ee�m w� �:�Y
. a�,eceln,nyloea . . we+�ei+:hotd,mold.aoe�odgemeetmtaim� -. -
(e)'Thener anA AuAltorlum'muns anY�."'°mbh fO6'"��"tl1ted to{unn:uea++aJ ,. .
� - �'endoaed un devotd to or ucN lar ohl0pint.:moie�rhYe in ux br P�ue�otlY M1mctb�u, '
.. . • ��pe�a����py���a, the lac Wlln ol a Prhate or memben anly ,'�
�. m�nto.lecturoortlkernlertWmaR '�h�^����° � .� I
t hm moen.MY 1..,
-(n•Em0loyee mems�nY Person who If ���aP�Y�^�^dnlcounseY�keNitW a +' .
� �P�oY�M+�Y empoyer In eansiderabo Ia �torea�hat deal nelu�IVeIY 4��oWCCO Prad� �.j..
w��Ll.ry or other monet�ry eompero�lbp �ta md secsaaorhs.A prN ee w memUen I �. �'. . .
^^H.���JaWw+�lm mwt P�ea+a Sbte d ;� .
� "' w(�'Fmpl�mvN.m a,��.wnM.. cao.,ao nm ua�o.w«�.�m��.i�mi. _.•�
� telp w coryoratlon,hKludlny munklpy iorpo- �M�• .
� r ibn or ahn ky 1 mury.wAo mrylo„We 3x 532 MY���or man�d��u+F
� . twkn al aIry pqaM(�)In Pltldn County.. �n4s m dha WablUhnrnl auhlett b�hb YLL - .
(A)'Pl�ee ol Fmployment'mta'u ury WeM1 ek wY�Ppb to fM M�ectw d Iha EnHrar
or u'a wda Ihe conwl ol�n emPbW w1YCh mentd lkJW DePWwian lor an ucepW���. _
pbymnotme11Y�9uentduMttAetwne �mod111W1�W fliePrmis�lurcnorcar �•.�. .
W emp7oymen4lntiudhlg.Wt na Ilmued lo. �b�h�°f11� �
, work uea,emplayee louneca,conlmence m��k"'�n�e 1h��°a�M����� .
room..+iw empbyce caleten.+. -.now uw dK mure�o mmaH•wm me poN�� �;:`..�...
See.SJ.Smoldn{Pmhlbiled In Publk%ua. �kn for wNch tl¢�P�la�4 raWaled wW ,
Smokln{Is DroAlAlleA In publie Pl�eo. �li��m��^��O�nclinlNOr��wY • .
� wi�amt6irtnmumi�eaw�he�o�kwr,e .nce.uimo�a��ra�jCOmart. . �
'� . (�)FJe+uma.SmoWn`Is proAlbNed ud b See.ST.fnla�e�°� ��
n4MW wLLNn Nwalon M huNdinp g�qr See Sl.l TIk�a�1'������
wed Ey m opm lo Ihe publk,4KIu01a elere Ml�n+le�'s dn/��vl�rnpw�slbk Iw .
con m dece,nae�..na mw�wwy�, aupiwKe���'�dw+�M
. (E)-Hoapttala and NeNtA Csre FacllNin. ��� �
�a°n��;�`�i,w�u�a��w.�w u �s��'.nw,�°`.a m•n.�a
aa�a a�sa+w�ssaio�,cxs,„n m.y e� a�ry 6cItl1Y.�m+6��7�MII pwt u
. �mmded Irom tlme lo tlme,fncludlny r�ulhy puse to he Posted ail'���ralon, '
� � rooms,puWle . reqnlrM M thlr��� ol ume sh�l1 6�
IWlr�riuMloEbks. mao�{er or emP�°yWl��V�O^"�°WM{� .
(e)Pu6tic MeqlnS poonu.SeuWoo la p�ohW.� �requyN to ve+WMf Idp�.Tha
'a�etrmm�.auMlurlums.���a,�indplrra tolol��'NO���n�ployeed� ,
d pu0ile n+aoby In nhkh pubUe buske,b owner.opa��'�° �nd Yu0 0�� . .
� canducled.whkd re9Wrn m provb�y dyKy �pampes�'�°���1�yeu�+.
panlclpatlon or oEserv�tbn 6y tAe�enenl �r�°�0f�� tra W r�ler � .
� Puhlk. Sa..S7�Np�°wbO d°
(�Publk Pnerooma.Smoltln N roAlhiled a comPVlat undH 1�+�Hde may lolllale
. ..:• W uN�MW M pubtic res�momi P eMorceneal w114 the MP�NPUtla Fnrlroo-
�<;�ti:> (t)NqIww�Y�W.1Smoklnt 4 ptuMblted 411w roeN�Ild�b��De dlxM�ued or .
� �F ad SeMc�e Fi4bluAmmu.SmoNn�b �.U�Ud+/u^����Y w��la Pro�ectln/
�`� �� - ➢roM611ed and 4 udawlW M Ihe 0 d tMt adMw��� . .
A'�7r WWk1Y m prWUN awned�+read themseivo a1�n�t enWronmeaW��° .
Y laad aMce ��mate wd�+lhe terrK lar«9 �
plabll�hmrnt,IncluAing 6ut not Ilmlled lo■ ti�°f 1P th6�P M•�Nac�PW°�
- co��e..noP.ede�«h,,nw�-wae,c,le. ,wn„ooM�t w«Y rta a mn aaF
cAeoneqe.uadwlcA ahoP,sad�fouat�le, ar dM�°�����411�
rn��waM.w olher a�Na ep�pllaAmml�. nuic� d�renon dUNree wlth•
; .n�IooE;euep�urWa Ibe IoqowNn Nreum. Ittla Lu
&c.&7.5 SAud Ipe A�P�MP vlror
.. tuice wherc�moklna maY�1+erm41M�l�Ae deelskn�uu�de 6Y reh�lw m lh��°°
. •..,e o���d m�rn�.M m��.�.a�uMm: ,nt„�d i�n mwR�P��tM decbl��
� � �.,�;.,,���,�,�.�.�.,�,�
. �``;, _ . � , � . ....F.-..:.��..�.::_�n;e�uaara�aux,�rxa,[w!a�6�a�t+0:9�.�e� �",�
1 � �<
yyy,,,,,��� r.,
�'� • .
�. � •
9 • � � ����� ����� � k�
�
I3ox E : t,..
- Aspen,Colorado i.�
PROOF OF PUBLICATION .s`
. . . . . . . . :Y
STATE OF COLORADO)
_ _ )ss. Copy of Notice
�
County of Pitkin )
, �
I,Loren Jer�kins do solemnly swear thal I am the �
�F, Pablisher of THE ASPGN 1'IMES:that the same is a week- }
ly newsp�per printed,in,whole or in part,and publishcd
in lhe County of PitWiy State of Colorado,and has a gen- � ;
eral circulalion lherein;lhat said newspaper has been
published continuously�nd uninlerruptedly in s�id � .
County of Pitkin,[or a pedod of more than[ifly-hvo con- �f ���,: " i
-� ��' ' sewlive weeks next prior to the[irst publication of lhe �rW��u'��PTM�c�w;��'� • �
annexed lega!nolice or advertisement;lhat said newspa- z w,a,uu,.�u.,,�i„"�,,,�A��S a
per has been admitted to the United Slates mails as sec- •;'�a�.wwian�..mi+a�.auK 4
h.�.�"ditv T�F ��e
ond class matter under the provisions o(lhe Act of March > ��w�nwo..i�o uK,�,�mm�.cwen�,; . ;
���N Ualcwltlii�acad Prop'vIrR41�P��•.
3,1679,or any amendmenls lhereol,and lhat said news- ?.�.m m�ruk xi��,�,i,,,q,�. t
paper is a a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publish- 5"""°���ee� �.�ct ' • a
in le al notices and advedisemenls w3th lhe meanin of `n�ca.n�a N m�,�. °epu"'�"'Qei'
g 8 6 .�sss, vmnm�.;xp��r:
lhe laws of the Slate o[Colondo. - ��` �
..•�f+F{t/H� G/�l—s /Y�E L rJ.
That►he annexed legal nolice or adverlisement was pub- � �¢���5,..� 9�y�,� ?
lished in the regular and enlire issue ot every number of
said weekly newspaper for lhe period of 1_consecu-
, tive insertions;and that the Orst public�lion of Said nolice
�w n the issue of said newspaper elaled
. 'Z A.D.,19�= and lhat Ihe last pub-
licati n oE s id nolice was in lhe issue o[said newspaper '
_ daled�_A.D.,19 �'iS. ?'
�- s .
� � t.
—� — 2
Subscn ed and sworn to be[ore me, a nol�ry ?
_ public in and for the Coa t of Pitkin,Slale of Colorado,
, on lhis�day o[ A.�19�,=. �
t
Notary Publi ` }
My commission expires ��{-��
_ _ y ,
.. . . . . . . . . . � . " .4�.
• .. � � � � .. . ��j
� . ���..
�;�
.. �t, . � . . . � . . . . . . ... . . � . . � ii:�,...
� . � . _ . . . . � . . . . . . .. . . � �/ . . �.
:�7��,x.'!.. ..� "��r'�"_'�"C�:4^�r�� ��• ��3{
3 h ' � t�. _ (:,. 1: .
/ ':..�. y.:
� , : ;: :. " , , �
, � �7.
� - _ p�.-7l� •
� t \
s f � :y
r � �
', � �.s �, ':
i. - 'i :
� � ��
�1 `* . ';
;
. , . ,
,. .
,. . ,. `
� �;
t,
1
�� '� '- . �..:..� ... � .�'. �^ ..
.. . ... ... �..,. :.: ...1 L �. ..�. - . '
�. ' �� " . � . . � � � . ' •
C�
�a�,.
A'�'�C
. f� • lv..t{/� ..
-:bS�"' � . . . . ... . . . . . . . . �_. .. ' i�iF,AC'tlidW"�F'xsl�i . `�'c'�t���j��.
. q a
`,_i • � � . . . ' ' ':
,.
� w` ' h �i,�3
4:: k � ��I l��1lTI� ���PS� � � ;:
4 . _ � .
�i,
� ' [3o�c� 1''•i
Aspen,Colc�rndv , � `.�'�:�,,�;i,,
. �5�`:
PROOf OI� PUBLICA.I'lON `� '`
:� r
tr
' STA7'E OF COLORADO) ���tl '�
i )ss. Copy o(Nolice ;a�. :.:
_�__ __:{ "-��:
, Counly o[Pitkin � ) �'``
. ' ;:�.
- i,Lorcu Jenkins c{o solemnly'swear thal 1 nm lhc :�,
( I'ubiisher of TI-IG ASPEN 77MGS:lhal lhe samc is a wcclo- '
I iy newspnper printed,in,whole or iu part,anc!publisLed ':� ;
� In Ihe Coanly o(Pilkln,Slate ot Colorndo,anil has n gen- .,,
j ernl dreidalion U�erein;Uial s�id newspaper hns been
` � publisl�ed conllnuously and uniidcrrupledly in s�id ;� '
i Counly of Pilkin,for a period of more lhan fifly-lwo con- �
seculive weeks next prlor lo Ihe[irsl pubiicaliou n(ll�e �
- amiexed legal noUce or adverUsemenl;lhal saicl netvspa- ;_ij
per has been admitled lo lhe Uniled SSzles maiix ns seo-
� ond cWss matter uncter lhe provisions of Ihe Acl o(n•larch ,� ��—�;
3,1879,or any amenclmenis thereof,and Ilial said ncws- `����—'� � � ;
�ae a�aec�e,�xEr�KeR'owvy.u+o unR,�
. paper Is a n weekly newspaper didy qualified for publish- �u,� ;� ,�,a'�,.'�, . 1y
in le al nolices and acivertisemenls wilh Uic mean{n of ��YtlN°�BY�'""•°��""
B B G �1-x,��.wy x u�w,m w.�eaa.r'�we�;,a�.���s:
lhe laws of lhe Slale of Colorado. �ua,�pweswu�dnrsanwoe�:
u�6eoua a Canryswsm�..a.a.�ObLk�., .'�.
Caort�on4 506$FWS�$t..A�Y/��� �. Y
That lhe aanexed legal nolicc or advertisemenk�vas��ab- .� v�.�bn.nemu±.aer►w+,kc:r�n`
' lished in Ihe regul�r aod entire lssue of evcry uuuibcr of fia��o��`�'�mi��',�.��p°,`�;�`�'
safdWeeklynewspaper(orlheperiodo(�_consecti- Taeao�nrb��auo�o��Wv
�'�a�e.��da.aTa.a�a:NidspN o(la+�on�
live 6iserlians;and lhat lhe(i�sl j�ublicnlion of saicl nolice �ra;,,,�1p9�,,,�,;p„�,es�v�a,pew„
- was in Ihe issue o[ snid newsp�per daled �Pxao.i�nnamw�.t�^"�°°�'°$'°"'°°
�A.D..]9 g� mid lhal Ihe lasl puU- {��iy��,�°o.�"u°�-�' �•
licafion�Ls aid aolice was in lhe issue of saicl neti��spaper � ����' �:, �:�:: ?
daled vJ A.11.,I9 ' , m..e,orcwurco�.�.'�'�..���, :
�.�• };r�n�Gheeunthauv�twba.wr.e.+�C i �
> ..__.
. ...i�------'— . - .
i
�_ �
5ubscribed and sworn �to before me, a nolary �
public it and[ot tlie Counl o[Pilktn,5lale u[Colc�rndo, �
- on thls ��� clny vf �J .D..19 g�=. `
,.-
. Nolary Public
, : My ca�umission expires C{�� �O �,
� I .< w �66� G�li� ��
� yi�"/`,i�n O� 6 •y ;,':
`. l. O ,
' o� �f� ��b !
a
; ,��� � c3� �
}y :o �C,�': : � � kl� , ',
� -.1 O
� ��` A \
/ _ Q�"�.� � . � - � . . � � . �� �� � . • �
�
-� � �` ' . . . . �v 2
' 1._ ,�,.�...Y_"'"_�yyu..�-.v>.. �'..c.,z. _.� • _- w'tw�y�.�"
,.. ��: _....;..��l.1LS.�b. ....�, �� .:��1`4���''Sy
� if
��,,�, � ,`-
. � .. , �. _ �.. .. . ',:.. -' _ ..' . . ' . ` ,- . 3
4'.
. �:. 1
/ � Y
� � �b1 �
. �
�.� ��. . . . : ,�� .�
.�, .
. ._', .. �.� :� . .. - ��.
:.'� ...�:' .. . . .. .� :. l . S.. �.
!� �"z �."����:�
: f
:!.�
' '1 �-:.� � �r .
` ..I ..r � . � .
.. � � ' .. .. . ' . �r. . .
.. ., .. . . . . � . �
. . . . . �. .....t �. � .
-�. .-: . "'. ' �/' l.�� . ._... . . ,- _ . �' , �..� .
.,:- _ . . _.�... '. .._.. ._.. . . _ �
. ' ._._ .- .;:.�.,. . . � .�
' - �": '_"" �._.a_. . ... � . .. . .:��. ��.: .
�� . .. � _ � � .. � .._ . � . .
• �fi •
,;�;�� . . . . , ' � .
. ,� ' ����,��.�,,
'� �..� .. `
: ' ' . ��� ���� ���� _,; ; `�
�...
(5ox� : .:.. .
Aspen,Coloraclo .;ri.:�
i :
_ f, •
"; PROOP O1� PU13L1CA'I'iON � �`�
j � �r ,.;
' STATE OP COLORADO) 'i
`i )ss. Cc�py of Nolice �`°w :`;
,i � -,
i CounEy of Pitkin � ) �. ;
. . . .� . ' . . . .. 4�'�.
- , I.Loreu Jeukirts do solemniy swe�r thal 1 ain Il�e
Pub(isiter oE7'[�IG ASPEN'CIMGS:tl�al tl�e saine is a ivrel: F
ly newspnper pdnled,hi,wl�ole or i�i part,and publisl�ed �. ;,
fn lhe County of PilkU�,Slate of Colorado,and Ims a gen-
ernl circidalion lherein;lhnl 5:1icI qCW5�1fl�7Cf I185 been
publlshed continuously and uninlcrrtq�(edly tn s�id � -�-:
Counly ot Pilkin,(or a period of more lhan fifly-iwo con- _
seculive weeks next prior lo the first public�lion o(Ihe. "
annexed legal noUce or adverUsemenl;Ihal said newspa-
per h�s been�dmiHed lo lhe Unlled Slales m�ils as sec- �
ond ciass maUer under the provisia�s of Ilie Act o(n4�rch R ,,�°� ����� f ;:`�"�;
_ 3,1879,or�ny amendmenls Ihcreof,ind lh:il said�ncws- ' Ae.�c�r�mmor!orv�sTmx�rrs �:
a er is a a weekl news» cr did uilified fur wblisir "°"�E��Y°r°i�°�` .w'n"d`
P P Y 1•P Y� • 1 be»m,e.me�w�a.ra�s�sns;
iag leg�l noUces a�id adverlisemenls will�tl�c meauing vf � �• .��. o1�!D�„�„"��;;
the laws o(lhe Slale o[Colorado. c�u�.sa e�.�s"s�..tin^o��"".�:
. . 1 �w PPIIUtWn�ubmlued by DoY�W;C+�<!: .. .
� 1 TruN�ro9�NN�n nlerol u ol lhs'.vnlcd' . . I
Thnt lhe�nnexed legal nolicc or adverUsement rvas pub- wov��_����e�y�,,��:
tished In lhe regular and enllre issue v(evcry number of f W";Avw�.ryx�s�.+w�u�c++r�:
w�
said eekl news a er tor lhe eriod of consecu- � �w�mu«.u.�s�em�o. ar:.mxn u;
. w Y P P I� �. :aPpiuved Febniv7�9:�1993.TM prupvtY h,, .
'live inserlions;and[hal lhe(tis!j��blicai7on of sat<I nolice ww�ansawao+k,c�.azc..�stNUi.«-.;
� � fn Ilie issue of said newsp�per Jnled ` �"'F°`""'�e°�0'mi0aicanu"°�y` :
9.rw at ide A.peo/PUtln Canm�mlq�:..�
�_A.D.,]9�j� anct lhal lhc 11s(pub- z ��'"e"'T°so�e �
�,y� �::�►aen.aeud:�aa�
licalion o(said nolice was in lhe issue of said newspaper ( ,, :� r mwacw�aeamd.+wa,. :
' daled A.D.,19�. E rmamn�amnKtivm?mn.wira•isvs ' �
� �4
�_ �
i : �
5ubscrlbecl and sworn lo before me, a no1�rY j
public in and(or the Counl of Pilkln,Sl�le of Colc�rndn, t
on lhis �O dny of A.D.,19�=. �
� . � i
Noliiry 1'ubl c ' f.�
My comntission expires �C�-9� ' y � U �
` G
ayq;y L l ?! a G ..�,
. : ;b �.. . . � . . � � � . � 1Yt, U, �y. . �i�,
n .��c� G . . � " � . . .. . � . . Vt � . � `.�'_;%
, �� l ,
� � � � �
• � �. � . � ��;;
� . �� �
•. .`0 11� . f;t:
� _, �
_ � - - - >:,, ,
���
�� �� �"
�..
. . ` ..,�.�i 'S,
, f f �,�, � ^��s1 '
s ,� S.
� �� _ �� ;
. .
:; .
, ., ,
- - :r_ r;
�", - .,
i�qpr`.� ,. - ,
'A . .
��
' . �d �' ��j,�,,,) i�^ '��r i ,���,�,�y� -% t ({��i�o-��•,y,- tr.�,."h. �,�'(v�'tr�,���.� '*�1 'la.�t�+n,�^ki:
_ .�:.A�M�V.R4'.?4!^.�`.�tiY'+�...�.v�.'��da1i •�.�.. � . . .t'i..D� tdt",lsiM�1^�1�C'1Y1 , .I�rl� �:�'I I .�.
:i'� .
� � ..i .. . � . . - � .. � ��,
' . . �p�!! � �� �I� . � _
101 RA � � � '•.'
� ' � � .r
. . � iT'�
. . . - r:' ,,'4
... � � �OX L � . . 'q' � ,.
�,::, �:i'>:
Aspen,Coloraclo i?:
E;;c:.
� . s.j
PROOI� Ol� PU13L1CAI'lON �-�� `
I'�. r
f� .t =
STA1'E OP COLORADO)
— = )ss. Copy o[Nolice , r" `
� . � . . �.�r.9t.::
. - � � . . . . - . _ �.q-..
� - � � � �COUIt�Y O�PI��CIII � � . _ - � . � r.;
1,Lorcn/enkins do soleuinfy swear lhal I�m lhe • S.
Publisher oE'fl IC•ASPEN 7'IMGS:lhal Ihe s�me fs��vcclo- ,`.';�
ly newspaper prfnted,in,whole or in parl,ancl published
I In the County of Pilkin,Slate o(Coloraclo,and has�gcn- " �''
� eral circulfllion lherein;lhal s�id newspaper has been "
. published conlhtuously and nnhderruptedly in snid :;'
County of Pilkin,(or a period of morc Ihan(ifly-Iwo con- �'
seculive weeks•next prior Io lhe[irsl publicalion of ll�e_ ,r
annexed legal nolice or adverlisemenl;Ihal said newspa- . .i'?
per Iws been�dtnilled lo lhe UnileJ Slales malls as sca
_ ond class matler under the provisions o(ll�e Acl ot�4arcl� s
' 3,1879,or any�mendmenls Ihcrcof,and lhal saiel ncws- � ,�:w =�'� °�`�, '
paper is a a weckly newspaper duly qualificd fur��uhlitih- `�"�°z"�`VP1mJCN°`�`�'t � � '
x�:c�+tormmonaeves�owrxrs� .
ing legal nolices and adveclisemenls wilh lhc meaning of "�T��"�Y°�1h"apih0`""`'' �
�MO�e�nea w�a.r;�.s�aas.�
lhe laws o!lhe Stale o[Colorado. u.�t.i-�«ws w�m!��°P°°�.' �,�
� !w�ew�a w co�ir co�.m�...w.w�e:
�',tc�oo.�,ws e ww si..�.Prn�o�.w�:
Tfi�t Ihe annexed le al nolice or�dvertisement was �U�1- w�pPUuifod'�otimllled b7�Sleven Tlseli•:
S � T�eauatW�.n anau�on a we wlee maa?V' .
I{shed In Ihe regular nnd enlire issue v[evcry numbcr of ,1�61/or t6e liomeport Mloo �oa x,,�e
said Weekly newspnper!or lhe period of�,_consecu- `R"�"'•°°iore°°O"°i0•x�^�9°°'"°"�a''
t twa memee m Jw�e M��95i The p'o�arb_li �..
'live lnserlions;and thal lhe fiisl j�ublicilion of said nolice r +.bc+�m�!Ae'S?V�MSWINd.$ec�kn7s.-TBM�'?
was In lhe 3ssue of said newsr�per d�led '•"'o�os°'""��°&w�,e:dueswrr.'t
lpor runLv�oto'm.�ion com�Tho-w�by u
� A.D..19 and lhal lhe last ril��- eheAavaWltki ComeuallY��I pmeat ;
"S�_ I oev.,,�uzpnso�s C�,.:{ }
icalion�aid nolice was in U�e issu�f saicl ne�espaper -,,, �- ����,; ,
daled d J���' A.D.,19�`,�. •�t.tr�mwKe'mnK,�.v�n�+h+ra�ses.:}-:
� '
�
'�: ,, ;
--- ��
;
SubscriUed and sworn lo before me, a nolnry
, - public In�nd[or Ure Counl of Pilkin,Slale o[Coluiado, '
on this�_clay of A.l�.s 19�_. • R � 1
r
(i(J
Nolaryl'ubic `O :n ,�
�,— My commission expires��t� ' y � v �
��� �7ph� >. � rG � a '
-~•. a �� '` . y � 'u- ;±,, �i
: >� 5'�=�' y a . �,
� � .: � { x' d . i
, , .., .�:a
��•.. E�, ,� -
i ,foo',� l,f �� �1 i
� r«'I`�i�� . ' •.�,.T
,.- . . . ' . ,.. ... . . ._�.. _ _ - - _ - -
�_. ' ,.._..._ . _
,_-,�° —°- ' ' .
`"'""""�'",,.,,,°,,. �> .
' i' . ,> ; --' ,
^' 1
, . � . S'; ��.
' � ��f^ i
^ ' ti
` . `T _ �' �
; , . .
+ '� a
��
:. --,::
. ., ,
,
� . -. _ .. . . i � .. :.
� � ' ,
i
C ir _
. _
, „ . - .
�; __ ,
f���.a�, _ ; , ' ,
,�,
_ W..� �,...�� _ .�_ � .w_, .
. -'M`f'. - ' ' � . !. - i:�'ti' M 1:':- ±�.
Jb-��.. ..:i��,.i'e::i.i_..:.�.. _. ..�, . . n ':a�� i� �4x� ..._ ... rtY+r'...qL.rtrt::sm:s¢.kna4.t.na�-w�ntSWi..e.r�ari.K.,... �.:,:�,
. ' } 'ya !�*.
� . .� ��5j� �.
y
. ��, ,,�Y`1!..
T�t� As���t TtM�s �;��_a;�: .
:�;.� �
�..
Box E
;�.,.. .
Aspen,Colorado � '.��
� ,
900Z'EZ6'OL6 ��eyy ssewn - .
!'�`''
PROOF OF Pl �,�o� - -�. :
. STATE OF COLORADO) �.LS$'IH'd2t _ �' ,�
)ss. SS�'WMOl�IS Ce `";��
t' �;
Coimty of Pitkin ) '.a;�.�c�7n�a ;` � -
I . . . . t,CaaMniJe�PaymenL M applleun mq . ..
•StBOa.�.�,a.nP.yme��h�s�eaadeeeiaiMf�a ,y�.
� �.w Ne Caunb'b mmP�Y Mlh Ihe studvds / �i
1,Loreu/enkins do solemnly swear that I am the '"b�1O°•�"'°'01"`a�'°"`�'a"'�"'P'�` `%` `
ment�Iuil ee ulal.leA�r mNUP.b'loy the
Publisher of THE ASPEN TIMCS:that lhe same is a week- .�eawwewd�reaaned�d�eeM.« �•,
I news � er rinled,in,whole or in �rt,and ublished �R�e.�..�w�duKr�a�oee.�em.n `,y:,;`'
Y P�P P P� P .a+�a u�mwuvM�«�a er u+�r-
in the Coimty of Pilkin,Slate of Colorado,and has a gen- w�(�v�4�u��a�"�+a�^� t�
u��m m..cM v.a��m�i.�a��qwr�a w
eral circulalion therein;that s�id newspaper has been ne,�keami.r�i..
ublished continuousl and uninterru tedl in said c.)a..�o�M..�wi�.c tmvka
P Y P Y w���w�mukw�anuK:u��a �at,
County of Pitkin,for a period of more lhan fitly-Iwo mn- rn<<.:namu�o•r����:�����a�°a.�«
secutive weeks next prior lo the first publication of the ��,a'�`i„�u,��'.:r a�rw�waw�a��b� � I��
aimexed legal notice or advertisemenh,that said newspa- �^�•�^��°°O°�o'°a'�• •i ':
N)SuMlunwbo.Mvht vWe wT Ec wb ..1
per has been admitted to Ihe Uniled States mails as sec- a.Mi.c<eny+moW,�e�qw•�n..qvnKpi
. ond class matter under the provisions o[the Act o[March �,a�;`"�,,;,�y,�„��"'°,,,',"'°� �
i 3,]879,or any amendmenls thereof,and that s�id news- ��� � ,�
()Mw•�w �ene�u�a�op�r.�w
i paper is a a weekly newspaper duly quali[ied for puUlish- ,�,��,,,,,�i,�'�„�a,��w�.�n
in le 11 nolices and advertisements with the meanin af v+Arc sh�ll brMODIhhM by a pualllled rcd
i g ta' s nt�te�PV��Q KnM��to both PWIn.
lhe laws of Ihe SWte o[Colorado. sneaMbve�•�vw����
7.M6W UN DeMuDt�eMS.Whrn lhe pru �;
That the annexed legal nolice or adverlisement was pub-
lished in the regular and entire issue of every number of
. said weekly newspaper for the period of_L consecu-
tivg inserlions;and that the[irst publicalion of said nolice
��s in lhe issue of said newspaper ciated „
; ,}L� �c� A.D.,19�_ and that the last pub- '=
F licalion of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper .�. �
t dated�A.D..19 �5 %.����i' : �r3:� � �
��� z�*�
� � � �
; '�+ x � �: � r 't'�
{ � ��" }`a
� '�
� ,s , .., ��. � ':
1 � „�K y. �.. � - r',
Subscribed �nd sworn fo Uefore me, a nolary ; � ;,
public in and�r lhe Coun_,t)�,of Pitkin,Stale of Colorado, F''" ' '
on Ihis��day of C)J A D.,19��. .�
°. .
,.;
Notary Pi Ulic • ,';:'
My commission expires ��' g '���
,. . rt � - i .. �p7I•+ .
�. � - �Xn t,.h��'�"�' i .
.�� ?h'.. - `''+� .. �t"�f�}3 _
n�'',- � . '�'. � �j w:�V,A�; ,$
o�.• ,` ��-, , ���.ir..�«t�`��I�:1�����4 !.�J 'i
'' ao �J
�': r. }, ,��, �..�
'.rc;:,.� - � ;[-
�,�J J..... . � 't�:1',. .
,
� , ...... _._.:,__,_ . . � .. .. . ,_ ._._.__.__.._,..: . ._.:_..._ ,...___ . .. ._. ._ _.... � .
:
,. .
. . .........._ .:.�..._ ,. ......_. _ ._. . ,i '
�� . � . . � � �' ..
� ,
. - r . �
� . .� ,l
~ . `,
�
` - - •
r
�t� , .
,�'ra� . � � . .
n:'I
STA"CE OP COLORADO)
)ss. Copy of Notice �
County of Pitkin ) r�m,�orrueuc��wvxi - .o�•�•�ar��•a.� � ;
PLEASE TAI1E NOTICE Th�l the Board ol Z�Mrvueu P.ymmt.An applicant mq .
Cou y Cammhalwmn ol Plttln CouMy.Col- ^'°���h peymrnl Nstead'of dedkNluy IuW � �t „��.
w�dq MII cauldu tM1e(olbwNg Ortllnan[e N a me couMr w rnmMr.�•un uk su�a..d.a .� h�.t�..
1, Lorrn Jcnkins do solemnly swcar th�t 1 am lhe UwBOVdsrqulvmcdin/dAUput9.t995at «��'��������+�wr .4 .�;��;,;.
&00 P.M.,PItMM Counly Camlhnwe.Dutriet mmt chall be c�lcula1ed bY�uLLlplylny 1he.
Publisher of'fHL-ASPEN TIMES:that lhe same is a weck• �,;,rt�,ow,sa e..i M.m sircn,�,P��,.� +�•a����w���o����br� ��: ' '+`" :
ly newspaper prinled,in,whole or in paH,and published �^��•^da�i°^��^°�'��10 �,"`"„d�1���Q`��"�„'iind;°„q„°���ri '�ry;�, �' �i:'..
in the Coanly of Pitkin,Sl�te of Cobrado,and has a gen- oROi°n Hci oPTHE BOARD OP COUNTY �h�<��a wi�i�n i.en��u�e w - ';,� °
COMMISSIONERS�OPP�77nt1COUNfY,C04 «�����"+�ollhelaodreqnhedto y• _
ernl circulalion therein;��lil�said newspaper has Ueen OMDO'ADOPTINO CHOOLIANODFDICA- he�pp�kdMlhblormWa .. :.i
ublished eontinuousl and unintcrru tedl in said 'nor+srµouros�nws (UCurrentMarketV�lue.Cunentmnket ;�,1; ,�
P Y P Y �.ip�n�w�s r�•,me�.rm s��w•. �+�^mw uk.�w uk i,�w u uK'u�a •>
County of Pilkin,for a period of more lhan(ifly-Iwo con- iNn n„�,���„��,,,�„c�,,,aw �n<<..n•m-u��peymmt,IoNudln{slle ;: . �,�
secutive weeks next rior to the first ublicalion ot the �^«��nM�°"'""�OM'•: ""v`O""1tl"""d""""„'"°°e°"k`'b'" �`;
P P �9sa:sas,n�u ww�uKw�w�a�iwaMdn�w�u: _�y. ,•�:°
annexed leg�l notice or�dverlisemenh,lhat said newspa- tyy�:i,oeo.n,aa,u +�«�u���«���n��ro'. a,
���aa.�a�� @)SuEstunlulon.Mv6et value maY 6e wb
per has been admilled to the Uniled Slates mails as sec- iyy����i���, staRWed6yadowmmledpurcHseprlcepl '.L ; �.
ond class malter under the provisions o[lhe Acl of March ��+:�a�r.wa�ou an uma knptA trma�ctbn no more Uun�wa
2 The Mpm Schod Dlalrict has daamined' Yw�d�w oNu mutwlh�Y���D�rec- . �:e
3,]879,or any amendments thereof,and that said news- mu m«.p.aerauK m.�.a��i�m� ����• �
a er is a a weekl news a er dul ualiGed for uUlish- �M��+�^p� �`�'MD`°�"�'";�"`"`"""`�°P�ind � '�" '
P P Y P P Y 4 P o�m+m wuaw u�anu. �c��r i:o� e��m•�c.a�..�rn -,.
in le�al notices and advertisements wilh the meanin of Mwm�uasaon�a�m. vdue shall De establb�etl Dy�quaililed rtal �
6 b S ..��:,�.
wd�:30M00:tudenu . nt.ee.PVr.ber�ceeptoele to bolh wnin. , . . .
lhe laws of Ihe Sta[e of Colorado. rm.t�,�xi�,�so:euda�u - '�*�ane»a.sn.oP.yro�u,�appraiw. -.
7.M4edUxDevela�ment�.�Wl�eolAeP�o- •::a=�:.�-:��•.
� 1�'Ihe BnW Nlmd�nce ua d the RoarMi{ �a �.� 'Y .
FarleSehoolOblrlalwWoe�pvle�d6� tMWlslonrnntWUamlxd1eddmtW.
Thal lhe annexed le al nolice or adverlisement was ub- he.��ua��wimenu:m�sa�;en�..ees� mmme���.����•n.�+<«w��-
g � '.sfudm�enalleA In�ha BaWI dwavuy.mld- wtlon shall be DeceE on the ba ol pro. �' �..'
lished in the regular and entire issue of evcry number of inewdhlyhsehods:By1992thaewae�.U7F P�droldentloluMbady. ' ,
said weekly newspaper[or the period of�mnsecu- ��a�����u�a i�m�.�xnod�k a uK a r�ona�.d m.i..oa o�a�uw.�w c.+n '�=
199�A+�chooi Y�.rnrotlmml M1d!�'�lo P�Y^��-- -� -
tivQ inserlions;and that the Crst publicalion of said notice �,��,,;,aro,,, �.�ao.aioia�.wb.�oaa�+«a�o .� :;
�.The Roarin8 ForkScAuol0lstAel w1i16e In4 ��^uMY m WIIIO the atantlerN ol�ihls Seo- ♦�
�s in lhe issue of saiA newspaper dated u�,nann�ie�mw�em,u;�a�wkuwnm.+ �:
and Ihal lhe lasl ub- u�ie.umme.d,��xm�1n�.d��ooi am s�on v�.�a snvi ne d�aeued�o we couner i ,
d IL �� A.D..19�� p � ;
�+ ar the 197b/97 aclwd Y�.Ne uD�r a� u the umcnl n N whdMSbn yl�.pprwd. � .
lication o(said nolice was in lhe issue of said newspaper . ,�„�K�ioo1s6it1i��„�„d,,,tt.,u,,,w ,.�e.� ��q�rowu�a�a.we� r: •,
dated l .2 A.D.,19 �5 ee..wn�n: aemc.�ea sn.n ee aem�m c.�uo�or me *`�
ta�m�syneiane:i.?ao:�w��u,.. ea..aorc��ycomminb�s
i MKh�WU atudmis' . . . . b.Gltai�Prl ��+�m��.m�eo.�e a .
� ToW:I,600stUdenti � County Canmi slonCS shYl ConfidV U1e co'o- �.
� 5. Seellon 3M12&13](Q ot the Colondo meNS of the applkable sdwol dbVlcl ro ACa- ��y;�
Rev�ai SulWes atatn that wumin mey.�n a ml�rhMer lhe Wnda propoud W be dcd4." � ...1'.
� . � Mnlmum,Include Pr^Wsb�u In t4etr subtlivl-� ated a�e ol edequ�le she ud c�n 6e w1�61y , ;
. sb�u devdo lor utwW P��P�d or whelher the �� � IY�
�bo regulatiatl lo reqW2 RSelvalbn M dedF P� . � .
. u�lon of altn and Imd arw fm�eAaob.�or IeMS Aave�Fe apaMllry ol belnQ sold,wltM1 the - ��
�� WYmmt ol asMMla wAleM1 dao�rot exceed P�����^8��.Im schoal p�upna.The . � .
SubscriUed and sworn to be(ore me, a nolar ��ullmarYetvalueofwMmernlbmor. �dsMddsocaroldvNeprobablelmpuu y ,
y��.dedlutlons. . ndLhhoAnT ProP�rlid al tlrc devdopmml
public in and f�r Ihe Count of Pitkin,Slale o(Colorado, '; s.rn�xnoo�ou��i�n e.��omr���e,� a��heluMbrieAoolpurposa.N7unNeland� ,Z -
on this�;il day of �J A .,19�_.I �ww��w m�i��u d�,+a��mm� vW�'k`diw.�iwe�i n��o a`o�i�::i� 7
on tAe need for IanA br publk sehools mA� hl 6e wld the Oosrd shall rcqWrc a cash
ll � heve prcpared�lormYl�lo ealculale the�e Y WY' `
� �mP.�, m�tM��a���u���,.
- �.nK b��..a nY m�s�ww ui.m�u�o Z CuMYNJa Paymml Paymmt al cuh lm
cala4te the anodard�k.�dwo�Iwtl dedics Iku ol a IW dedlatlon�M1all be mWe to the �'�
Nolary P bl ic � �o u„mimw,:�,�w.«.a•�waa w�u� c«�er wb�e w a�.o�ovonw�r ow.�o
Q_�- ¢ �dme z awdenu Y�eted per 0welll�uau+ the luusnce ot+nY hulldina P�Ib Iw the res-� �ti
Myconunissionexpires � o e„aa�u�.w�a.ra. a��ura�u�aWm..
t r�koen.schow onena w�a��.� The IormWa lo dMmnlne a ta�MMku psy- � •
! squue 1«t ol land ere�per swdmt and 1he � t k u IoOOwc
� �ROaringFprkSeHoolDlclrletprovldn7.�9S - MvlrtvdueolWd:ayqkWleWOddedlct
... . puare leet ol WW area pu studrnt. llon standud pv�init z numher ol unlu pro-�
�� 0� - - � 9.The Aapen ScAod o1.vi�cammbsmned• Paed:33X aewwt d osF yymmt� � �
4� .. � `.. � � turvq whlc�determined tM1at the following ' ��^Pk.lw a praperty IuNn6 a mvlcet
� • ; mmber ol atudrnb are H'�+�ed per AnNllny laod vdue ol fl W.W m whkh oM lour EW . a
� '� xi^' i unttMthMthepprkt: ' - Musebpropaaed�IM1eD+Ym�M-vmWdbc ,I�7.
v tioo.000=o.az�e:t:oa�_te�e.w. -
;,';� .- 1t I �.°n'�e�a��:o.as.wa�� - . e�ei�ewu,�.nir�m.. .
CD '4 � ��.2 bcdroom:�o.w awae�ts t i..�a.�u i.oa.a�mc.«e�o�ne ew�cy �.
�; {^ Y "�3 hedraom O.6B stWems - �Punuuu w�IIJqSectloa shdl.6e held bY�he
� � 1 bedroom:1.01 swdmb Caunty lor,�he A�P�end Roarin9 Fork Sdiod ; �.
'� '•. �'1 ` ' ' Sbedraom:l.t9studm�s . � � � Dlctrlcts.mUl such ilm!'o thq shall be .
��� '• � I:.�.14 Caku�Nbn ol tlie bmuls rnulb In Ihe n9����bY 1he aPD�^ble sdwol dbulct br �
: -f ' . � • �ulwd'P��e+7M'aPPllabN�ehooldbWC[.
'�°tlowl°l1uM ad�°�°n swiEardr shNl De re�ponslble Iw myaleoance W uld
�i�J.�••.. .. I /upm5ehool0lsvlet NoarWFakSd�ao1 �
�..... � '�.��' _ lenda In a�rmoosbk mm�ier whlle lAey.ve' .
._._ .,,.�,�„_,,,,, ._....,. _ ....�,;;,�,.. . ..,...._. . domlwy .OU00eam(Os.IJ AOOOacres btlnBheNMtheCOUnty}'-
. � - . ' �(0'atJ'� � ... . . . 2 FuMs.All lu�d.cotleaed P�m a 1Lb `.
� � ' studlWl bed:.OUIR aao(52 iJ.) �.00l7 'Swelon shdl�e trenslerted by Ne hullding .
. . . '��.�cra(72.1J . . . bsPaemr w 1he Ow�m direclw./w dryull Io
- � . �.�2 bedrvom: .0095 xres(116 s.L) .0133 d'slgwted Inlunl bevloi�t' � V
' - � �� (571 i.0�. . . �CauoH shall Ha1d Pondi.The counry shYl �
- -- 3 bedroom: �.o1Q�ua Q07 s-IJ.0225� hoM Ne WnOS unW wth thne u Wep aANI be - ..'i .
� �ves(9!t�l) . rWuested M�Le+DPfo61e ulnol dbukt Im: .
' � ' :I.bdraom:-� AI18�aes(l.OBI sl).03/5 tM1e acqule4loa ol Wd br scM1ml WT�n..or. . '" t '
.. . .+ae.p.sol,l) � � - ru.utnerc.qwwu.r+wem�nh+dateaWr. �-r .�?� .
- � " . 5 Edronm: �.02B/ava p.2]6 s.l.).0�91 .nlnQ Iunc�iau tor eduescim WTow.u wWdi'
� ae.n C1.717 i f.) . tlme they shall Ee rdeued to the appticable�:� _ .
� . . ''��' . .11.Beew+e W Ihe co�l 01 a�bdiMdeA land In frlwol d41r1eL.. ' j.
� Mlldn County.Ihe 3chool Olslrlcls uM%tkin b.Deed Resvle[lon.A deed rae7etlon aAW� �
- Counry lure dedded to requlrc peymmt d a be pl�eed on any land�equlred by euher ���I�
"cssM1.IrtUm waunl whleh b lesa 11un lhe IWI s�hod�aMCI lor Aouclnt rnWeWy oavp�o-
. . . ,nvke[r�Ne d the land va whlch would D'�lhe uWb�altly to emPbyeea d Ihe WPIF ' �:j
- � � .�eewl�Iram.ppllratlen ol thae Ynd dediectlun uhle�eLool � -./ -
eumn. �•.
� .. ..1��2�7M Npm ScMo�pnrkt submlUM�n �F.PerloAk Rerlew.la ordmto auure tMt . .
. , ��P��o����h,Pro����, �he lend dedlcWOn�unduds whleh are �� _
� �� �to Ne Wtktn County 4nd Use Code ��nsed are Inlr and represenl�Ae currml r
.. . �w1�kh vauld ePPh Na��a����°^��" level ol Mee proWded 4Y lAe school db- �f., �.^'
�d v d�looeirra M e mWwbdlvlMo�n tricts,the d<ale�tlon�chedule shall ba , � ,
'W.On May�and hne 6,1995�he Pltkln rtvlewcd 4y�he County,ta�ewer wlt�the
� . CwntY�Nny and 7aNna Caomksbn rnm �ehool dlsvlcts.�nd�mendM u necnsary: ��°�' .
- ddved tlle ProW�ammdmmU W lM land Wllhln thee t3�YbR d 14 dlMh�e dNe YM 'i...'4 � ' .
- " .. . �..UseCoda . m1Arce(�Y�athueaher. �..,! �
. .NOW.TNER60RE.BE R ORDAINED M'Ihe �CW�+W�Ae propoced Ordloanm�e avaLL
. ::'%fldn Counb Bosrd al Commbabnen: abM br Dubik Impecllon durlul eegWrt 6�F _ .
- .. I �..77ut e new SeUlm 11]O6 0l Ne Rttln Coun- ne�s hours In t�e 011lce o/iM1e Clert�nd ;� .
.;'bWWlhaCode6emecteAloreedmlWbwa: Rernrdu.S70Fwstb1a1n5tretMP�4Cobrtlo 1:
!:3ntbn 3I706 ScM1ool W W Dcdkubn Sum BI6I l.Phone M1�92031l0 � ;
1 �'y��. . . JeanetteJOnrs,DepwyCwnyCk+k .
�.AMW�ocmry.xnadwda.eiw��,�.o- PubllshedlnThebVmTmeslulY29:1995. � x'
/ YsrN i6s11 be assa�ed uP�n NI aew subdlN-� • �:`
alons eoMalnln9 roldentl�l w�Nf wlihiR uNU; • ;1� � ' ,
. COtPOfiled%Itln Caunty. . .;
&IMenL The AsOM ane IcoamY Fwt School� .
� �Dlalrlch requlre Isnd lor necessary�cnaol� �':�.
� � • ancuon..x�td�mw u�we.wi are na umn-; .j��,
•- ��d m.«Inol Widlnn..upl�Iaclliiks.open .
space+nd recreatbn uea�eud lauslug lor� . ' ,
. � emPloyen.The puryose al.�hls Scctlon Is m� �
. 1 urc Nat m derebpmMl o[Nn w11Nn lAe� �
bpen and Roarine Fork Sehaol Dla[rku�uW , �'
- � MtG�10lM1I 111 111!fC110O1i�YMf.T�le CYRMI .
i�.�i oi:m��pm.a.a m.��ae�i.u�n�
� . i. malnWneQ ThU 1�accomPqshed bY ttr Wop .
. . . 4on ol atWnds br ncw�uhdlvlsbna�o pw � . .
. . i .vlde IW,a<uM�Wa thereol to�he County.
i.Iw uae Dy�I�e aDPneWk achaol dl�Vkl.The . . .
qyMlrtd�ue pned on�he number of sOWenu
� � � the tlevNapment eenuate�md Ihe currml
: lavel ol servlee snnd�r0 wltMn nch sehool �
' tl4lrkllmWdareaiuurlde.dpersludenf. � . . .
COedla�lanStM1edWe. �
� --" �-" ' ' � � i.laad DMk�llon.Schml Wid dN�c+tbna�
1��_ . ; �lWI 6e u�eased xeardlnQ m the IoIbM� . �, •
��eheduk:SCHEOULE OF SCFIOOL IAND UfAI•
� G710N STANOARDS .
� lW�c'tyv� �.pen scnod outna rtn..• .
'iC`x.':�, � InpForkSchool . . .
WdDedlcaUal DlslrkYLand '
Stendvd DWCetbnSlaMW �
.. OorMtory .00DU azrec(D a!J .000�
ettn(0 s.IJ
. Sludlo/One bedroom .0012 aeres(52�.1.)
� .0017 xre�(T2 s.4)
. Two 6edraam .�95 acres(41G c.IJ
�e..) .n�si arrec(sn..L>
be.lraua .UI�:'t ncres(7U7..1.�
,.�_.. . , , _ � :;�����.
,� .;. �.
�
� ; ��� � � � ,
� � � �� �� �.
� r..
,,.
, Uox L .��..
Aspen,Coloraclo ':,x�
� i,.,
PROOIi Oi� PU13L1CAI'iON
�
S:.
STA1'E Or COLORADO) - F,;,. i
)ss. Copy u[Nolice �. � �:
___ County o[Pitkin � ) . � ;
_ ��.'
. ..�i � � .. � . ��. >.
_ i 1.Loren Jenkins do solemnly sivear lhal I am Ihe
Publisher o[TI lE ASPLN TIMES:lhat Ihc samc Is a wcck-
ly newspnper prinled,in,whole or in p�N,and)niblished
in the Cowily of I'ilkfn,Slate of Colorado,and Ims a gen-
eral dreulaUon therein;thal said newspaper h�s bcen
pubifsl�ed cm�Hnuously and uninlcrrttpledly In saicl :� ,
County ot Pilkin,(or a period of morc Ihan fifly-Iwo con-
secutive weeks next��rior lo lhe(irsl public�lion n(Il�e,
annexed legal noUce or idverlisetnenl;Ihal said newspa- �.y.,�,�y Yr ,�N��t�,�;s�„T,,,Y,,,:;�r:
per has been admitied lo lhe Uniled Slales mails�s sco- I�'�ne,MUwurwr,sv,;iwcrtbNMta�siuz; �
ond cl�ss maller utider the rovislons o(Ihe Acl o[A4arcl� ��11RD�a�"��"v'+'�`�`'"�%;'
p ,-rc�nonceaxr�srwvvNa� n�ute�.
3,1879,or any amendmenls lhcreof�0I1(I IIt.II 5:11(I IICLVS ��;ru.An n,n6ia�w�qeeaw�a!dpYUss•,
� erlsa�weckl news» crdul u�lifiedfurniblish 'u.�w.:_:Ka�m_n�us�o�end«�'
r•r r i•r r n • i ���a.�a�o.��..�..�,
� ' !ng legal nolices and ndvertisemenls wiU�lhc meanin�af :��E��:�+am a�? �
- llie laws of lhe Slale of Colorado. `'"'°p�"'�q�'°'''"`J°'"°�'""�""`
. irq ch.rn.b4 inre requneuH,ppMn�'eo�: . .
. ���prYe Mo;mRd bb��and Wo rcqnn�N�y;
Thal Ihe annexed le al nolice or ndverlisement ivas �ub- ��atHiirdRCNeO'Ceer°�bo��and
6 I .xeme o�ui�www.�b.uk v.00e�e.�e,
' lished In the regular and enlirc issue o[every numbcr of =�°�'���°�"°"''��'uWd°Birttef°�!�'+
. :Rod•lals5k6,RIdQedBuilam0lGde�MEed t .
said{veekl y newspaper for llie period o[1_consecu- r„ee,e p.;�:,t we ein sw�t��s�aroat�.�
ro�
li,yp inserlions;and that lhe[ital j�ublicalion of said noUcc �r�.nro�0 3�..weee'es ww w'�an.i
- �7" �,PJ4F (nMerblaaullooconuccFnnel i � . . �
tv� In lhe issue of said newspaper daled :j¢,��.■�<u..iw.kv+m+e4��r'
� '�_A.D.,I9 g� and lhal lhe lasl pu6- x°�'°tl"°�°'°°"��F �}'y
�MMhWC'�GYY't t 7'ii.J;
lication of s�ild noUce was In the issue of said ne���spaper � m..aas«.�yoma.i..iooa. ,� •`�;
daled A.U.,19��. `�wna.neamn.�ia��.i b4�s�=�"
. . r . . . . . . _ . .. . 1 '.
� .
r 5ubscribed and sworn lo beforel me, a nolary
public in and for lhe Counl o(Pilkin,Slate of C�Irn•adu, � �
on this �a day of J .U.,19�. ;
l ;
Nolary Public � �
. /j �:.W
My commission expires��
9,
�y�l�... ��; ' s'� G�G� 4:�
... !
�o ,'.:R2> �� 60 �Y �ti�
� � �
�` � - c�,� � ; �/� �9?b � "
, i
� 'c, ,�;�'�.� . `��� Np�]- , l,
• roo �.. � �';
' `
, �,- ..�
� �
'�1 L!� . . � • � i
�.. .,...,....:�W(.w'.:.::C�aNS....Wo�KY�' ' , .,� �
/ Il'
� �, .. . .:. .
, .
,_._�. . . ..
_.
7 t
. ��' _ - .:a�'i
_ 4�- �
�'
... .. _ :�. , a Eft x-��
_ 7 I
I ,
i �
1 F ` _ �•�
,� � tY
� j � � :`�� f J .. �
` �1 �.
. ' ' _ `'(,. ... - . t .
. , i .. .. .. .. . _ .
.. . _.,- . .- . . . . . , --- �. ...... . . .
��: .. ' . . .. - . . �
�'e 7� • : .
�f .
�
':,;1{JLn.. ,o .a.._. �._.. , . . . . . . . i � . .. . . . . - � . .
.f.�
SR
. ,y '+T'",J�f
� `1 ' , ' . . ..i'���;.
i . "
f
r'.'�� 1 . . , � -. _ ���• ���� ���� �. � .. . �� • �.
i �l..
� ,
� - � � � - �OX L� . ' � � . i`;-. ,
.. . . . . .-r.
Aspen,Colorac(o ,•t,,ay
. � � .� . � . � � . � . . .� ��r:t�,s
. P1ZOOii Ol� PU13L1GATION
S"PAT&OP COLORADO j .-' ,
_.: )ss. Copy of Nolice d�,;,:
Cowity of Pitici�t � ) '�,w�;::�
�..�: :
1, Loreu)enkius do solemnly swenr Ihat 1 am Ihe �� 'y
Publisher o(TI1G ASPL•N'1'IMES:lhal Ihe same is a�vicek-
ly newspaper prinlecl,in,whole or in parl,and published
in Ihe Counly o[Pitkin;Sl�le of Colorado,�nd has a Fen' mr s� `
eral drculalion Ilierein;Uinl s�id newspnper has bee» �`�,rr��m3�ii'�w�ucnonc�,�M
ublished conUnuousl �nd tu�interru ledl m s�id "& -��A�cx6x�ncx:Exre�+s�oraa;
P Y� p Y� �;.�wsTm a�ns�'�,�k-.,:x M " r '� `
Caunty of Pitkin,for a perloc!nf more 11wn tiRy-fwo con- �'��Y�+:�+w� �
_ seculive weeks next irior lo the ffrsl �ublic�limi of Ihe ^i,s,�"°"�°b`"a°°"W`°"°°'��"'+�9}�n°°5
� 1 u7-���h[�o baM n 5so om beo:e ' . .
annexed Iegal noltce or ativerliseu�ent;Iha[saicl newspa- �' ��'wCa,eeyeon�u.s�oners.niune=
� .\e�Ca+elroonV506 E Wqi 34!VD�a toeauld"er-' �
per has been admilled lo lhe Uniled Slales maiis�s sco- ,-a n eppllut�dn�ubmllted 6r Sharon Boucher�
ond cliss matler�nder fhe rovisions of lhe Acl of 1�larch �'"°9"°"°°'°"fd1N0"°�"iedru""�°"'�
V .�'�o.�a�x.We rt�w�+.pww<e�.r�o ,
rt� y
3,1879,or any amendmenls ll�crev(,and il�al shicl nc�vs- ���TM�aora�ru�N����n.l
�iai..ne h awh d u pred a l+�a acu�, .
_ paper is a a weckly newspaper duly qualified fur publi4h- �`,;ktd1n�w�a.��w P�'.wTP:i��,wa��'-_�
h�g legal notices and�dverllser��ents wilh!!�e meaiili��nf y��,;���.,����y�, •
Ihe laws o(the Stale o(Colorado. ,Y��«�,aew���; �
. . :=�n '+� �y;,3`eowurcoumycommb.ana's'� � � i .
Tii�l lhe amiexed legal nolicc.or adverlisetnent tivas pub- ""'�A!-"�'°"!"'T�!`*�"°��'"�'a��`":_ �
lished In lhe regular and enlire issue o[every uumber af �
_ said�veekly newspaper for lhe periocl o[�_consecu-
- 'liye inserlions;and lhat lhe(irsl j�ublicalion uf said notice
was ht Uie issue o( salcl uewsp�per daied
�J�� A.D..19�_ and lhat lhe last pub-
lication o[said notke was in the issue vf said ne«•spaper
daled�A.11.,19�_.
,� . ,
— —
Subscrl6ect anc( sworn lo Uefore me, a notary �
_ public hi and[or the Counl of Pilkin,Sln(e of Co.lorado, �
. , on lhis �O clay of A.U.,19 q5 .
• i
�
i.,� .
Nol�ry Public :
My commfssion expires�� O � �v
c G� � :
, „�;K,� �� d- G s
y<1� D� �.�. / O V, f k.
'j .•' .9p , �
o ' � � , �� �b ��{a
.-�� i C� a •'7 . . . . F°�yf
� ' 'c
.. ; ��. a . - . . . � � �:
1 �
I ) � t
" �" , . . � . � . � !���...
1.; . i
J`� J t,f J ` , I
.�.�� , `,..•� . . . � � . _� . �� � . � - . c' '.
���r�� �_. _.u..:�:..,�..�,,;���.,:.
r
� - � , �r
� _ ,� ,',
��
�. f t�� ,
; �
r ` -.: , � ` y : �
7 4S.
, .. .'
- ..i: . �'� . , ..
�
.j �.;" ,,_ .. � . ,�. :�-:- . , .� . .��.'....�'.
.\ , . =r.t•ji �
, - • _.
' . . :' ` , ,:'.. � ,.-� : �.:� � :..° . ,.. .'.� .:. . . �� . . . .. � . ,
� .
. . . _ n{' . .� .
� t� . _ ' ; .' ..
'� .' .
, .
�. , ,
� � ;:K.-�.� .Wa��'�e„�St;mS.. ,:�-�':.a.�..� .�..'�� rc �:���.:. , .�.:�. �,�:� . -�� �Au.�C..-.✓aiu:.Rtt.��i�"c�f.sa�1@AnA�N�t�tv:Yi;NfS'i�C�iaAfl7W,im. .
. • - _. . �lA1N •.
y� .'.�_�
. . '�., i ��.
� ,: :��
-� TH� ��P t� . . .:�_:::
� Ts��s ,:
. ���:;. .
-- aoX E :.;�,
Aspen,Cvlorado s,'� �.y:
t ,�
: �� r•
PROOr Or PU(3LICATION ,i�.. .'s:`
,� r
- STATE OF COLORADO) ��`�. �
_.._ )ss. Copy of Notice ;x-,�
; . . . � � . .. � - rx�.,, .
' County of Pitkin } ��••,.,
:�
, �
iI,Lora��eukins do solemnly swear th�l I am the i� .
Pubtisher of THE ASP6N TIMCS:that Ihe same is a week-
ly newsp�per printed;in,whole or in parl,aud published � .
in Uie Counly of Pitkin,SWte o[Colorado,and has a gen-
eral circulalion lherein;that snid newspnper h�s becn � `
published continuously and untnlerruptedly in said ''.;-
_ County of Pilkin,for a period of more lhan fifly-l�vo con- _ ; t,
secuUve weeks next prior lo the[irst puUlication of Il�e ;.�� .
annexedlegalnoliceoradverlisementjU18I581(IJ7CW5'�:1- PL6ASETAKENOTIC6ThaCtAeBwrdol7 •
CountY Comnu�laov,o(PLLtln Coun Co4- �y� .
per has been admilted to lhe Uniled Slales mails as sea ,,.a,;.uw,aw„�w,nm�n��sxc,;
ond class maller under the provisions of Ihe Act of M�rch �"�"°:"�°- ,�P"°tl`h°�'ado'Nedu'°'
3,1874,or any amendments thereof,and lhat said news- �:���ewioy+la�ew�i�r.�nn�`
, �
i er is a a weekl news i er dul ualified for ubiish- dv���"T�z4{u+�.ea,:
. P•P Y P�P Y 9 P cow�,aoxsw.�asnnx
ing legal noUces and adverlisemenls with the meaning of -_ �u���qek:
lhe laws of Ihe Slate o[Colorado. �shed1"7°`:�1p41"m°°ep���z''
ivss.:
. .._. . ��iK l- G✓�I-S ��/lf f M � �+ie�
That the annexed legal notice or adverlisement w�s puU- ��wos r 9, l4 f s
lished in Ihe regular and enlire issue of ev ey niimber of 0"-
. said weekly newspaper�or lhe period o[_�___,_consecu-
,� . tive insertions;�nd U�at the first publicntion of snid nolice
was in the issue of said newsp�per daled .
�y A.D.,19�j and Uiat the I�st pub- r�
licatian o[s id notice was in the issue of said newspaper
daled ' , � _A.D.,19�,�.
' � .
'�.� \
� � L }.
�! ,
Subscrib d and swoin to �e(ore me, a �totary �. ,
- public in and for Ute Cot ity (Pitkin,Slate of Coloracfo,
0o this `�'_day o[ A.D., 9�. ' ;:
. K,
Notary Publ c -
My commission expires�S ' : ;
i
- . . - . . . . . . . . . � . . ..4,!
�'3 :
. . . . . . . . . . . 1 : is]%1
� j . . . . . . . . . . � . 1
. .i :'.� . � . . � . . � . . . . � .�� .
� . . . . . . . � � � .. . . � � " . . . . . . . . �!..!.1
� . - . . . . .. .�. `� 1�i.
� ' � . . . � - ' .. . . ' - . I
. .... — a. ... . '_p.. . . _
. : . .. _ _
.... a. T"ti� 'eRiL�v ��..�ytiih-+A•ys,�.�,.da...+�.xw.�.+y.�. . . ..5:`�� '�
y..� .u���� .....
� _ A� 1
/ � ��l
. _ . . . � .. ''.t � .
... .. '� :A:
�a ". . . '� y Y -' I
�.. � �. i " ' � ♦
' �=
. t i • �• ' . •� ' v '�' . ' �: . .
� .
. �
:� �
s ��, F`
�..
l � :� �
_ r _ ,
,
�'•
- . _ t
� - _ - ,
`�5 '
.-.�• " . "
�
,... , , . ,,.f...;ki;t
� • . ��;Y yk'.
� 4
y .
� � . Tt�� AsP�N TsM�s � : : . : ���
� ;� .. ,
BoX E ; r.�,.
_ � Aspen,Colorado g� ,,��
_ _. �i,:
� PROOF OF PUBLICATION :�
,� ,.
STATE OF COLORADO) � :�-� r
� )ss. Copy of Notice
_ �
� h�� :
County of Pitkin ) �'�•�,;
. � � . - � .. � - . 4r.^
"� I,Loren Jeukius do solemnly swear that I am the F� '
Publisher of THE ASPEN 1'IMES:that the same is a week- :,�
ly newspaper printed,in,whole or in part,and published , '
in the County of Pitkin,State of Colondo,and has a gen- 'f�
eral circulation[herein;[hat said newspaper h�s been . ' `, .•n ,
published continuously and uninterruptedly in said ��,_�_„�m� ., _
County of Pitkin,for a period of more than fifty-lwo mn- ; '�i�3`wrw.eireucNancE•-,�<r�r�r:: ';'
secutive weeks next rior to the[irst ublication of the ��P�E TAKErN077d.Th t lhe;6wN W ;
P P a�'w.�.`aw n,°����9r�'�
annexed legal notice or advertisement;that said newspa- ,},,�y,�,,:��w��&�- � r
! per has been admitted to the United States mails as sec- m'mea�o�xda� :..-,u,,t,t:; �
ond class matter under the rovisions of lhe Act of March �'�pPSO�ON`OE'v�e�°""°°F�courrtr-: S .
. .�i P . �-,CO►1ML�610t1ER5eOF.PIxICIN COUNTy�C04�-; � .
- i 3,]879,or any amendments thereof,and that said news- ,°�:+a�T�NaF,�erROV,u:,oF nre;;
. ,McUh4E�MQ5'k77mAAP11fUN POR i150 X GF764�.: ,y
- paper is a a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publish- +pr,aeoucnan wr srur��at x,�zueo;
ing legal notices and advertisements with lhe meaning of �d«�;;n;�,a i���„�.�
llle laws of the State of Color�do. ,wpeb r«�:w�no�aw�..nwu<;
. . . o1peR:6ours lo Id�;olllce ot tAe-Clerk aad�. �
Recordar 370 E:NNa St,Iupm,::�Calmado j� . .
That the annexed Ie al notice or advertisement was llI)- �8161IPhona�JD783Y6U0. 4 lCh4 tr *
F> P �:,y•, x�e��w.�rmaura�:
1lshed in lhe regular and entire issue of eve number of ww�.Maw'rn��.vmTM�o�ww�l�s.::t s
said weekly newspaper for the period of�consecu- -'� "�- """
_ tive insertions;and that the Grst publication oT said nolice
wa in the issue of said newspaper daled
.o`Zb A.D.,19�� and that the last pub-
lication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper ,
- dated alo A.D..19 °1�. ' (
`
� '
_ — : �;
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary
public in and for the Cou ty of Pitkin,SWte of Colorndo, �:
_ on Ihis�_day of U A.D.,19 qs .
� . . . :t � � � � . � � � . . - . � � a-;' 1..�-.
Notary Public
My commission expires��$'
=s':
'�: ��_7
.ro ,i '` -
, .
.,�
� r�J
r il
S �ihlriR�•"r6AiP^ a•�•"•� .�r� {
/� J i � 1���}' , .
� �
� �(+�
.. ).� `=1.r.-
�' ♦
� � �
l 1 �� �t
i �. ' .�,.' ��. . (H .,
r.
�' ~i r j
. l � , :.. .. .�.. �.. .
� � .�.�..:,� .._.-: ..+�. � . .. _ .:. . ��. . . ��� ���.
. .. . . ... . . .� . .� .. .�... . . � I .
. . . . ._. . .�.
. ' _ _ - _ �,s L._.m . . . . . .. . ..
� -
.. � � :- .. :� . . . - - .. .. .
. . ��`�� . . � .. � . , - . . . ..� . . - . . ,
a-.t• '
...`*�.
�'�". . � _ , ,� .
• .'Ipr�•,..'z�,
i-Ft'i�.f�:�
,i•'
' . i+S ��,
. {
� + � � ����f0� . . . . �`�•�.i;:
> . . . ��� ��� . ; �-,w
- � . . . r�_. .
� I �OX L . :'�H��'r ..
� .. j . . � � . .;Yh'.�,'�
' I Aspen,Colorado .-• � �
' � ��, •L��r.3
PROOIi Ol� PUl3L1Cl�TiON i��, . ���
,
. STATE Or COLORADO) �„�r r
)ss. Co},y oF Nvlice . � °'• �:�
. -
—.. .
,.,�, �.
County of Pitkin . ) T k'=�:
- .�;`..;..`
1.Lora�Jenkius do solemnly sweor th�t 1 am Ihe ek
'Publisher of l'FIG ASPEN 71MGS:ihal Ihe snmc Is a�vicek- . •
!y newspaper prinlecl,in,whole or in parl.�nd published �,� w
in Ihe Counly o[Pilkln,Slalc o(Coloraclo,�nd has n�en- �:'
' ernl dreulation lherein;lbnl said newspnper J�ns bee+� S��
published conUnuously aittt uninletrupledly in said •
" Counly of Pilkin,for a periad o(more Ihnn fifty-Iwo con-
secidive weeks next prior lo the firsl publicalion of Ihe `'.,'
annexed legal noUce or adverlisemeny Ihal said newspa- �'�
� per hns been aduiitied lo U�e Uniled Slales matls as sca 6��;,� �x=�n�,,,o-�yt���:; .�
� ond class maller under Ute provisiuns o(U�e Ad o[Mard� I �suasaNia x;vlmoatvmw:a`,.caa�,;
� 3,1879,or any amendmenls Il�creof,aiid Ihal s�icl ncws- �'�r�!��°"�YarvrnwLL��eem'; 4.
. paper fs a a weekly newspaper duly qualified fur pid,lish- w��' �wa w�ne.y,�us isss;
in le al nol(ces ancl adverlisemet�ts�viUi tlie meanin�u( `'�•'°°"�"°e°'"�'`°b`d°"s�°"'°°d°°::
8 B 6 cn�euw w counq cammb.laua..,a.u�n�.
lhe laws of lhe Slale of Color�do. c«�e.�:sas e;►m�s�.e.o�n a md�,';
. . . �uu inV�•�e�d Ey WeA;'e�c 9.p'.
.. ,wn!c�i�ntYii 10�1 FYraN ReNew aod Gaia'�; . .
That lhe annexed lega�nolice or advertisemenl was pub- �s���`•vwo:���it�uoew+, �r',�;.
Ilshed In lhe re ular and eulire Issue ot ev r�uwnber of "`�eNie°��''�`"'°P�'i"011"" �:�
6 3 �cw e.�xo.a:.�a e annwe6..,w�=: ;�;.
said yveek)y newspaper for Uie period o[_�___ consecu- i�d r�a W�uee'e'�b^s�u�'a s�u;,
_ Ilve insedions;and liml lhe(irsl j�ublicalion o(said nolice. �ra:�:pro eo sown;n,�es w.,�wnK ar:
.PJI::Furlmlt�v:4Nrm�tba cmYURICk6Mpq"
was In the tssue o[ s�ld newspaper d.iled �'"°"'�'w^�°°"'°""Y�!'�°'�.
�{ �S' A.D..]4�� �nd llial U�e lasl pub- °epi"°"'�`��'' ` '
uw�n.�ae.�a.a.t,
licalion o(s�id notice was in lhe issue o(said ne�asp�per � ' Boidof��°°'°�'
daled_ J�u FS A.D.,19�_. , PuMbhWlo7Te/uprnTmaJUyl:19%. S�,
f
;'��._ . . � .� .
. � - . . � . . � ,i,
Subscribed and sworu lo before tne, a nolary
_ puUlle In and[or lhe Cowi�of Pilkin,Stale uf Color�do, "+.
on tl�is��day ot J A.U.,19��.
r' .
Nolary�'ublic n" m
My conmiission expires �('�{—�� O 'r0'� J�.�
G �' .
' Q' .
4}� ;pp.�,. �7/` O '�Y �
i y .. p v� J, .. .
c'' �;,y y . . . . . . . �� �6 . . . � + :�.:i
zz ` '-�: � O �' � � � =
� � �� � �'
, �•. �
� ��; C� �, �_.
• _ 't �,:
O� ••, ��� • �� �'
; ,.s,�:.»._ I
�L.r�ur.aivi,�^.,aui.e.cM:a3x»�.l��r«,..wc.c�Fi.,.r.�x,o:�:t.aa,,.�..a�.u`.+uiz..n.e,.�s.,�a.�`.�r;Li�lean'X�uat;`r�«;tF�-�.�'`':a4;+..,a�c,. ;���
� ���a
. � y' �:
^ ��
1 `` '�'\ :
. 1 . .. . .S� ,
�.�
' f ' . - . � � . I 'l. , - . .
, _' _ ' . � � - . . . . . . ! .
. . .��. . ,� . _ ._. ..... _.
. . �� �' .� � ' . . . . .. . . . . .: . . ... .. . ., .
t���. _ .
��� '
. . . ` ' . . ._ _..._.......�...��......r«rvr.t�wr�nts:�M'�"' �'..
. �
. ij ' �� ��1\
f > �;
y
s • �:
5 • �.
� I �� � �'
As � � -
P�N T
t��s
, ::.�- .
aoX E , �.,.
� Aspen,Colorado i� f�. ,
i
F
i PROOF Or PUBLICATION s j
Y
,f STATE OF COLORADO) � `
i
)ss. Copy of Notice ti�- �
.___ _' . .. . . _b�.: �
County of Pitkin ) �"''�
' I,Lorex/enki»s do solemnly swear lhat I am thc Q �`
Publisher of THE ASPEN TIMLS:that lhe same is a week-
ly newspaper printed,in,whole or in pnrl,and published '.��
in lhe County of Pitkin,State o(Colorndo,and I�as a gen-
� eral circolation lherein;that said newspaper has been � `'
published continuously and wiinlercuptedly in s�id •
County of Pitkin,(or a perlod of more lhan fifty-hvo con- ;�3
secutive weeks next prior to the Crst publication of U�e
annexed legal notice oc adverlisement;that said news a- £ ��Et?TS�3 '�•�-t • ; +
, per has been admilled to lhe United Slates mails as seo- { �PLEASE TAKE NOTICE�7A�t m.aam or:�� ����
ond dass maller under the provisions o[lhe Act of March ?;�N w,-°"°�-"'°"°a•""�°c°""',c�''?
re�d.:..�aon�u.c.��ssf...
3,1879,or any amendments thereo(,and that said news- •��"�k���w:+�w���;
a er is a a weekl news i er dul ualifiecl for uUlish- '�p.���°``-
• P P Y P<P Y 9 P ce�u�w�"�P°`p°�,�;i i s i�n�Peo:
ing legal notices and advedisements with lhe meaning o( 5„�;y;,,e,������ ,
the laws of lhe State of Colorado. �wwa.�a►�QS�n��wn v�.ua; .
.... . �;��Sh�b TU°21.Anlcle 69.p, .. -'R•. �
rL y '• JWMfCJpIlJ.DlPINYCOI�IVCIHIt j F r
That the annexed legal nolice or advcrlisement wns Pub- �. P„pi���,�;�„n„n�p��;
Iished in lhe regular and entire issae of eve�y nwnber of ��?=� ;_�
. said weekly newspaper for lhe period o( 1 cauecu-
tive insertions;and lhat the first publicalion of said nolice
wns in the issue of said newspiper claled
A.D.,19 QZ and lhat lhe last pub-
lical on f sa'd nolice was in the issue of said newspaper
daled�. '� A.D.,19 �}�.
.�' � Z — -20�`-�zr-- ' �
Subscrib d and sworn to be[ore me, a nolary
public in and for lhe Count o( itkin,Stale of Coloredo,
-- on Ihis �day o( A.D.,19�_. ,
. . , • .
�
Notary Publi
My cammiuion expires 9�-�� . �'
.''��
- , ��
.. .. . � � . . . . -� . '� ��. .��_i
i � r 1'
}� '
7
_ r �
�. . � .. _
.
. .��
'?3n�is'..�s.:.wo�i.�d:wi�;:�:r'��..4n?rltbnu�3�i�r`n:.�s�:�ar ,.i.�ird:� - :.;;�a t �" i
���lS
��`�.x����..+z'r�������� ;J`
.ra ��
����. ..._. � , . ��4_,'� .
r �.
. _ - . . ' � . ]r� �
^ , �7}
l- _J '
` I J `��� � � �.r.. � � �
�' � � .� . .. .. ,� {. . . .
� � -- �I .. . . �� .
. � �� � - . . . .
. . . '. .. . : . .
� " � - . . . . � - . . _.l. .
�,:; . . �.�. .�...� . ':,.' i. . - '.>..f_ .. _. � � . , .
. ..�I .. �. . . . ':� , . � . . , , �
� ."¢'��� .. . - � . � - . ' � . . . . .. . � . . . .. . �. .
. . � . . , _ . _ . , ' . ..
„�: .
,�
��,.�.�.�.�..M.�,. �
�:�+�'a , � , � �
� �',..:i-�, tr�,
Y.:
' t
� ���M� � �t� sP��t T �s : � �: .�§j
� t� �. -.:
� . . � . . - � �.�' �.r .
Box E ; �
� Aspen,Colorado ` .}
� . . . . . . . . 4 h t�'t,s
j PROOF OF PUBLICATION � '� :��::s
c
STATE OF COLORADO) � r
Y^�_::'
- )ss. Copy of Notice
r"i':
County of Pitkin ) 'y:;� `
. ',� . . � . . . . . . 4!:.''._'.
I,Lorerr Jcnkr�ts do solemnly swear that I am llte �
Publisher of THE ASPEN TIMCS:that lhe same is a N�eck- : ;Q: ,'
iy newspaper pdnted,in,whale or in pnrt,nnd published
in the Counly of Pitkin,State o(Colorado,and has a gen- Yj
eral circulation therettt;that s�id newspaper has been
, published continuously nnd uninterruptedly in s�id � ��. _' - r
rueuc"NOii E'��-��;r�,
County oE Pitkin,for a period of more Ui�n Ctly-hvo con- ei.eese;ri,ice rwncc n�.c�n�eo.aw ; 4 `
- seculfve weeks next prior to lhe[irst publication of lhe +;�r�������-e�i�ua c��y,ca:�.; ,
. �n oa Au��rt 9,�sss�; . I
annexed legal notice or advertisement;that said newspa- '�n �k�w�h�5+�w�u�': •
per has been admitted ro the United Slates mails as seo- a.�u'+ °�"°''��°"'.,r,i..Mi�a rae�e; '
ond class malter under the rovisions of the Act of March f�1OC4``°`"`3i°°�"`�°"E"`"'�i �°'rwy'`. �`�
p �n�a�a.�,a.r�m r«w�wn x.Me�..
_ 3,1879,or any amendments tltereot and that saic!news- =��D�d1�^^�p�bo'•����v;,=
�::llW�wttn���Veilea PJr�eiiy plaht :lo'; � d
paper is a a weekly newspaper duly qualified[or publish- ruk:��sa,caw�w,n�"sue„���; .
m le al notices and adverlisemenls wilh lhe meanin of �� 3 tLleaneuelodb,pep�yCwny.pck,: _
8 S S ,nmwn�a u;na,�n�„rwd s�paana s
lhe laws of llie Slale of Colorado. ..:�� �, , ' �#,�� }�
�..
_ That the nnnexed legal nolice or adverlisement was pub-
lished in Ifie regular and ehtire issue of every numUcr of
said weekly newspaper for the perfoc]of�_consecu-
tive insertions;and lhat the[irst Nublicalion o[said nolice
�w n the issue of said newspaper dTled
�_A.D.,19� and lhat lhe last pt�b-
- lication of said notice was in the{ssue o[said newsp�per
dated�A.D..]9��. ��
\" 1 '
_�• � �.— .��`�_ '
..c
Subscri ed and sworn to be(ore me, a notary
puUlic in and for the Cottnty ot Pilkin,Slate of Colorado, .
� on this�_diy o( A.D.,�9 g�.
i
(.(.J F,
_ Notary Publi
My commission expires q-�(—Q�
. . � . . .. . .. . . �� . . . � .�4'�
� i: �_�;
,�; -
� ,, ,,
.
� � � ?�;,.
�.. .�: _.. ::.. .. . _,. � _
��A�_:t,... _,,�.: .. . _. , . w _
:
� ....�:s��-j
y� �•
•
�.',. �� .:-�. . ' .'i ';'. " .'. ` .. :�i " �-..., �.. , n
t
s
\ i� �;1�
� '�.
� �i 0
� ti �
1 .4� � � .�� �
<. s.j _; � `_; � � y.
' �l � .
1. ; ,
, ` r •t`. J.
, .:
_ .
,
. , �
�. :__ .
. .__' , ,._ . .
,� . . - __
� ' _ ` . _ .. � .� . ,
.f.. ' , �
."�' ... ` � � . . . � .... . . .. . . . .. / � - ._ .�...a�.r�.ww._My�lwtlN.VIISYY47Abti3C�l7��I�
, .� �i�t t;
� � �� �SP�� � . ��� A�
tM�s
�: :..
aoX E .;�,
i Aspen,Colorado , +,
— 4
. PROOF Or PUBLICATlON � s:`
. � � � � � '��Y ,
STATE OF COLORADO) '�� �°
_ )ss. Copy of Notice _,�,
_.. _ . r���..
County of Pitkin ) � k<:,
'� •r
1,Lorrn Jenkins do solemnly swe�r th�t I am the ;�
Publisher of THE ASPEN 77MES:that the same is a wcek-
ly newspaper printed,in,whole or in part,and published _.�
- in the County of Pitkin,State of Colondo,and has a gen-
eral circulation themin•that said newspaper has been �� '
publ(shed continuously and uninterruptedly in s�id ��'�
County of Pitkin,for a period of more lhan fi(ty-lwo con- `�'
secutive weeks next prlor to the first publication of llie . -• �
annexed legal notice or adverlisemenh,lhat said newspa- *'r��.,�= '��euctionte°'' � v�j .�
PLFA4E�TAKE H077CE Tk 1 the Bo�M Ir i
per has been admitled to the United Stales mails ns sec- �„iy�,,,,,i..w,w:,�tRrw��cow+srrcoc; a`�
. ond class matter under the provisions of lhe Act of March ;«.ea.r�w.�v�u�i«��w�!�.+��y
i,nu :aiilY+ioi�d�u�tlChnrfrer+�Wedtfie._
3,1879,or�ny amendments thereo[,and that said news-' ��x�xw�,; :�o� 4pe�y���
- paper is a a weekly newspaper duly qunlified for publish- �����r�°�m �
in le al nolices and adveiiisemenls wilh Ihe meanin of «vw:aPiq�a+rbd+!p�+a�uk24eru�j;
de 6e.Cbbt���•�a
Ihe laws of lhe Stale ot Colorado. s t�,�u��x��.;
F�s% �,.? - ._ k:; . � ����.
That the annexed legal nolice or adverlisement w�s pub-
lished in lhe regular and entire issue of every number of
- said weekly newspaper for lhe perio8 of�_consecu-
tive insertions;and Uiat the[irst publicalion o[said nolice
was in the issue of sai newspaper daled
�A.D.,19�_ and that lhe last puU-
licati n sa d nolice was in the isstce o(snid newspaper ,'
dated 2 A.D.,19�_, r
l
'�— � L _ �,c.� �,
Subscri d and sworn to be[ore me, a notary j:
public In a d for the Cou y [Pilkin,Stnle of Colorado, :
_ on this�dayof A.D.,79��. . ;
'; ,
� .
Nolary Publi
My rnmmission expires Qsi_9 Fr ,.��
< :'
._ , V�.;
:: ,. -.:_,
� _ i "
�:
y,! .
5�
r, '
��� �
� - � �.� ��- ��
. {
, :"` - � „':
- � �:�r ,. �
' C'�� ,
` `f; �. . �
4 �' �. :r
. . ;1 � '' > ' _ . � .
' �
1 �`'�l
. . ,
. . �.. , . . ^ ..' ' . .
� ., . � ;.; .,� .. �.�. .; _ . . .'
.I. _ , .. . . :,.
.. _,. ..,, � . . ..�. ,- �. .. � .� -�.: ::� �
. . �..: ,.:... . ' . .�, ... : 1' ..:, .,:
. , ....,:., ' '.'i._. �. .:;, _. ...:, ... .. . _ .. � ;. .,.
.. ,., . . _ . .
1 A
. ' . , �... . �: :'�" �'." �i' _ . _
�"
�� ' -• .-�— -v.F_ �. :,'_ ._..F -ni- ..'-' . - . .... - .
.
�. . . . . F , .:. .-. . .
. . . . . . . . . : � - .
� �: . � � . ' � � . .
iy�.��n. ' . . : .. . .�. , � . . .. ' . . � . '
�v � .. . . � � . . . .
.,vc.:
,�
__ __
.:
.
'yY � , .
V . . . _
..�..es..�. .. .. .. .: ,.
. .,. .. .; riM� u. � .� . . . ' . - . ......-. .�.. . ..»_.�.�.._._._.._,. ,......._��.-..— �f.,.f.f�:y(..
�
, , � . � � . � "T'�
� T�t� �sP��t Tt��s _ � ._,:����
S
F: -Cy. .
.. BOX� : `,,x�
-- Aspen,Colorado , ..
.,"i.,.
. c<:^,:
. PROOF Or PUBLICATION �`
4'
�F
_ ; : 'r
STATE OF COLORADO) ��'`,� ':
--- - )ss. Copy of Notice F` ,;.
� :
County of Pitkin } ' ��h
�..:•
I.Loren/enkins do solemnly sweac Ihnl I am the
Publisher of THE ASPGN TIMGS:that the same is�weck- %9=, ',
' ly newspaper printed,in,whole or in parl,and published
in the County of PitktiL State of Color.ido,and has a gen-
eral circulation therein;that said newspaper has been v"�
published continuously and uninterrupted(y in said
County of Pltkin,for a period of more Uian fifly-Iwo con- ,�,�N�;, < _ ' , .7 ,F
secutive weeks next prior to the Crst publication of the �:ces������,�'�' .•
annexed legal notice or advertisemenh,tliat said newspa- ,�01�'��',u�,�°,,,ww�on ewwc s.�s�+! ,,
� : n�o�w� 3
per has been admilled to lhe United Slales mails as sea �waa�"°`��` �h`'' '3
wao.�,d��^ .. .. 7,
ond class maller under the provisiuns oflhe Act of M�rch It��;,,�m�oewlea we�.wo-pov����
3,1879,or�ny amendments thereof,and that said news- k�,,,�,°"`�`,y�,�r,���`n���
n� er is a a weeki news i erdul uilif�ed(or ublish- �rn,bz�.��:�°'°""'°R`°"'s�""'°�
g legal nolices and advert�iseme�l,s with lhe mcaning of n=.r�°�m'�''nK�TM�°d,�`�"°'-�';
Ihe laws o(the State o[Colorado. !�"� ,,, , --- 'z="'
That the�nnexed legal nolice or�dverlisement was pub-
lished in Ihe regular and entire issue o[every numbcr of
' s��id weekly newspaper for the period of�_consecu- '
tive insertions;and lhr�t the firsl pubHcnlion o(said nolice
wa,s� i¢ t�he issue ot said newspaper claled '
_��,�_=A.II.,19�, �nd lhat lhe last�+uU-
licatl� E s id nolice was in the issue o[snid newspaper
_ daled��_A.13.,19�=.
_ , ,
�. :� ' � � _ �-�-- '
Subscrib d and sworn to be[ore me, � nolary
- public in and[or lhe Counly [Pitktn,State of Col�cio,
on lhis�_day ot A.D.,19�_. I
. ,
i .. �
�.,
INotary Publ c
1. My wminission expires q��
. . . . � � . - .. .�H:.
... � ... .. . . . � . . . . . . � '�`t-..
� : � ��•j
�� �;.
� '. � j l';
i : . F � ,
-�e a .s�. ��-���- _ r .
�«� '�'`'��,�����`����-��"�� �'
i� - _ r
� . . ' ' .`r �,.
�i� h
. � :�.�N .'�
! :5 �j
,4 - � y
, , ; •
�r
� ,..
i ; < , . - : ,
� i
l � _ -�. ``•' 1 � .
_ , •
- _ :r'_ _ r.
i�� : - ,
. � :,
� • _ � �
,,,�. ' , -• �