The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.min.reg.12061995 �r , �� , . f `� it�p��l+��tilliu�ib��+,��. S Ma'/.r �'�li.:: �`3� ��l�S.�1��%?�i•} !.:. �7�r.1?t{Ati�s., .�.�,A �ti �-� :��i�.�� oi'��.7pl�Jf4�� 1 L �`�1��+!,;.„"�'�;t�.a ,�,�, r, �" :,.« � �;;�.�4; ,� PTTKIN COLTNTY CONII�II3SIONERS (�-�•;, REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ,:•.+�,y WEDNESDAY DECEMSER 6. 1995 =�: ._. �:`,•; r (Wayne&hridge Not Present) z :'i,� • 3:30 PM Location: Plaza One Conference Room j,c :.:..'• ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO AGENDA ` CnNSENT AGENDA ��s�l�-.�:. ' 'i: ; Minutes of Previous Mee6ngs __ a '. 1 Motion to Appoint Christopher McLaughlin to Clear Air Advisory Boazd i �nl�rnvrSTRATiVE ACTION& - 1. lst Reading & Set for Public Hearing on December 20th, ABO Redevelopment � d Agreement Amendment Ordinance, Gary Esary � ` � 2. lst Reading&Set for Public Hearing on December 20th,FAA Master Land I,ease, ' � ` Lee Remmel �,� 3. lst Reading&Set for Public Hearing on December 20, Resolution Setting Airport ��' Fees and Chazges for 1996,Tom Oken, Scott Smith �.;`' 4, lst Reading&Set for Public Hearing on December 20,Resolution Establishing Fees [Y! for Floodplain Referrals, Fireplace Registra6on and Community Deveopment Fees, . Suzanne Konchan s - '` 5. lst Reading &Set for Public Hearing on December 20, Revision of Solid Waste "� 5 Center User Fees for 1996,Stan Berryman �. 6. lst Reading & Set for Public Hearing on January 10, 1996, Ordinance Adopting , . City of Aspen/Pitkin County Energy Conservaflon Code, Stephen Kanipe �� 7. lst Reading & Set for Public Hearing on December 20, Building Section Fee Ordinance, Stephen Kanipe • 8. lst Reading&Set for Public Heanng on December 20, 1996 Budget: Adopflon, Appropriation,Set Pitldn County Mill I.evy, Lynn Dunlop 9. lst Reading&Set for Publ►c Hearing on December 20,Pfanenste�l Road Conveyance, �. Jane Ellen Hamilton BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONVENES AS BOARD OF DIRECTORS ASPEN AMBULANCE DISTRICT 10. 2nd Reading, Ordinance Adopting Lxase Agreement between Aspen Ambulance District and Aspen Valley Hospital,John Ely � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AD70URNS AS BOARD OF DIRECrORS ASPEN AMBUI.ANCE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLiC FIEARINGS 1. 2nd Reading, 1995 Supplemental Budget Resoludon, Lynn Dunlop 2. 1996 RF1'A Budget Appmpria6on and Adoption ResoluGons, Dan Blankenship ;.� 3. 1995 RFTA Supplemental Budget Appropriahon Resolution,Dan Blankenship }' *� 4. Water Rights Purchase and Sales Agreement,John Ely - ---- BREAK ; � 5:00 PM Location: District Courtroom PUBLIC CONII�iENT, CONII�IISSIONER CONIII�IENTS,PROCLAMATIONS LAND USE PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Auerbacher 1041 Hazard Review&General Submission,Brian McNellis � � 2. Cote 1041 Hazard Review&General Submission,Rick Magill ' 3. Aspen Highlands Sld Area Master Plan, Rewning & Special Review, Francis Krizmanich (continued from 9/2'n , i 4. Balcomb/Stephenson 1041 Hazard Review, General Submission and Rezoning,2nd � Reading, Ellen Sassano ,,. i 5. Pfanens6el(L.ot 9) 1041 Hazard Review&General Submission,Rick Magiil �� ;_ LAND USE ACTIONS �+. ��=� ( 6. Hazdy Subdivision Detailed Submission,Ellen Sassano i' � -` { 9:00 PM ADJOURN � ! � t... � � � ' �;' ; ._.. _ ..____. � •.... .�:: , .. _.. W - . • : .:� .. ,,.:,�. ..... . . ._ .. . -_ �. _ _ `' 'S=i" �� ... . ,-- _... �. ,._., . �-- , y ',5..} -. . , ` r;�, �, � . '. . � , . . . _ . . � . .. . . . :i', '. . . . ' : i - � , . • ' r �; � � ;�;�'�+,. . ' +� ,�?�d " � J••• _., �T� . .',. � . r � . � . '�yw . e ,.,�,r�FL�. ��'t..��!%,2Mrs .'y..��.�y y9��:-..M^�ir �� . , -?�'.e'�� :::....:x..�tY7'V°.f��2�.,Y`'�w�.`6�t..T'E�sbifir....'"2+{SL�i6YfiiUS-e�,M9C �:l �S„'. �4...�I�� A!�'ou�e d //o-9G - ; t.;: � , ;w. �±��u`: �INUTFS %�i .�"'` . t'('T..' "� . PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS � •' '�� '_i _ . tiy�� • •.j, ''. REGULAR MEETING =:;� :- � �+ AEGEMBER 6.1995 �` �` � � �,=.o _ � t `� >'y;�-:; 'h ��- - CAI,L TO ORD� Chairman Ireland called the meeting to order at 3:40 p.m. - COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESFNT: Commissioners Jim True,Leslie Lamont, Michael " Ireland and Bill Tuite(Commissioner Tuite amved at 5:45 p.m.) � .� ('OMMI�SIONERS ABSENT• Commissioner Wayne Ethridge °'�. � ;;_ PL1�3I,IG GOMMENT• Chairman Ireland opened the meeting to pubiic comment. There being no comment,he closed the public comment portion of the meeting. � ['OMMt�SIONER COMMENTS- None. < ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO AGENDA: Suzanne Konchan requested that an addition be made to the consent agenda for a motion from the Board to appoint Christopher McLaughlin to the Clear Air Advisory Board. Chairman Ireland welcomed Christopher McLaughlin to the Clear Air Advisory Board and acknowledgerl that the Boazd will add the motion for approval to the consent agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: � �y. \ �PROVAr OF MiNUTES OF REGUi AR MEETING,JUNE 28,..�995_•_ �i ' _ '; AND SPECIAL MEETINC,. .PT�F__ EMBER 8,1995 MOTION TO APPOINT CHRICTOPHER McLAU�HLIN TO CLEAR AIR ADVISORY : ; �812 � Commissioner Lamont moved to appoint Christopher McLaughlin to the Clear Air � Advisory Board. With a second by Commissioner Ireland,the motion passed unanimously. � ' ._i , � .. ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS { � ''K_. ,, � , ;�;; �; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1 DECEIVIBER b,1995 ; i - � �F;}�`- �� "=:�'� ��; � _. - _. _ 1 .�---- - • �.e14(:+'#kt T.X.$'"l,'w'v"'•r,� '.u�9 • ., „ � .:?�''S�a. .': -�-:.a"S,,.g3t,�c._i,.-,.., s:e �. . . �.r::'. ... . _..v. :...:.. .„ . �°�id...��M�.�.`5'3..°i�', '�. -,. ? # .., . - '�. . _ . -: . . . . . . . � -�,,.,, .�. . .. . . . . � . . . -� _:- . pi ��. -. . . � . . .. . � . . . . . . f . � :��. ,' .,�,� . . . . . . .. 1'r.. .. � . j � � � - � � � .. ' � � . +t- . � , / L ... , . . . . ' . . . . ..� .. ....�. .:(:;. . \ 1 - . .. . . � � - � . .. . . . . . . l� . .1 . . . . . � '�..' ' .. .. . . ..'�'. .�;.� �'., :- . - ..� . '. . � . �,' � . �- .I� - I � . ..: . ' - . . — _ _ .. ._._ � .f'_ � ' . . �. ' . I. ' . '�� . . . . . , . . � '� ' . .., ' .. ,' . �� . _. .._._ _. .� ` � � ^ � :�;:;;. ;, . ,p ,,..,-:. �,.;�..�s y ��.� • k ��,�t'�;:'� �IRST READING-ABO RFDFVFr nrnrtFx7�a� E M NT AM NDMFNT '" 9RDINANCE-MOTION TO APPROVF. .,. � Commissioner Lamont moved to ap�rove thc first reading and set for public hearing on �.,�� December 20,1995 the ABO Redevelopment Agreement Amendment Ordinance. With a i� '.'�: second by Commissioner Trne,the motion passed unanimously. �.` •�- '-:; � �IRST REA]uNG FAA MASTFR i AND LEASE MOTION TO APPRQVE '' h� r ... S; ,,,.._ ,. ,.. ` Commissioner True moved to approve the first reading and sct for pu6tic hearing on � '- :., _ � : :,- December 20,1995 the FAA Master Land Lease Consolidatin Three Leases. With a �'�'' . �� g 4�.,:.-. -- ; second by Commissioner Lamont,the moNon passed unanimously. �',:`. ' ' , _ � �,"',,� ' FIRST READIIVG RESOLUTION SFTTING AIRPORT FEES AND CHARCFS FOR �996-MOTTON TO APPROVE -Commissioner Ireland requested a portion of the airport � fees be used to study single event noi,se phenomena. He asked that the cost of the noise study g be added into the presentation for the second reading. Commissioner True requested Scott Smith i .,; , to research how Aspen's airport fees would compare to the other airport fees around the world i . and present his analysis at the second reading. j i k p Commissioner True moved to approve the first reading and set for public hearing on � ` December 20,1995 the Resolution Setting Airport Fees and Charges for 1996. With a " second by Commissioner Lamont,the mofion passed unanimously. FIRST READING-RECOLUTTON ESTABLIS�IIN F E FOR F OODP AIN REFERRALS,�FIREPLACE REGISTRATION AND COMMU1vITY DEV OPM NT � FEES-MO'fION TO APPROVE ' Commissioner Lamont moved to approve the frst reading and set for public hearing on December 20,1995 the Resolution Estabtishing Fees for F(oodplain Referrais,Fireplace Registration and Community Development Fees. With a sccond by Commissioner True, the motion passed unanimously. f; ". FIRST READING-REVISION OF SOLID WAST C NT I�USFR FEES FOR 1996 I �----- MOTION TO APPROVE ' � � . � Coramissioner True moved to approve the first reading and set for public hearirtg on � � December 20,1995 the Revision of Solid Waste Center User Fees for 1996. With a second � ' by Commissioner Lamont,the motion passed unanimously. ' , i. , FIRST READING-ORDINANCE ADOPTING CITY OF ASP N/PITKIN O NTY ; ' � ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE-MOTION TO APPROVF - Commissioner Ireland stated the Code was a good Code. He also noted the County limited the requirement for a cover ; on a pool because of the safety aspect of not being able to see a body at the bottom of Yhe pool. '} ' �� •s� i. :�... � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2 DECEMBER 6,1995 ., � = <, �. �. . r ,. l :: � / �...� . . , ., . . � �, .� � ..,�. , _ �� _::� } ^ . .. .. , . � _� ' Y . , •i..� , ._. 1. � . . - , c; 1 1� . , . _ - . . + ,.�'�; , `�{�� ;� _ �'16�J� . i:.7."1M�Yw.lifl�� .5'.�_ :.,a.an . ., u � . ,.rf: 'i '�{r�..krnJ;,:✓A{'.�`�f-xf..SnlvNi:'tl,nit�4:L'4��f?�i41{A�$`:.1faZ�1Y117{7�.li��f,M�Zt( '' � . .. . .. . - k�'��k�`t X •�� x.. , k: - , � �,: �'.:� ,,,, ; ... � Commissioner True moved to approve the first reading and set for public he:►ring on ,��' i January 10,1996 the Ordinance adopting City of Aspen/Pitkin County Energy �-•'�� Cortservateon wde as amended to exclude the requirement for pool covers. With a second i,. by Commissioncr Lamont,the motion passed unanimously. r, �1..' .} FIRS'C R ADIN - I DIN S . TION F F ORDINAN •-MOTION TO �s_;:; ,!' � APPROVE "''"' ' _._ (i ;�;:��?,. Commissioner Lamont moved to approve the first reading and set for public hearing on ;"-'- December 20,1995 Yhe Building Section Fee Ordinance. With a sewnd by Commissioner �'%;�> � I-. True,the motion passed unanimously. ! :: � �IRST READING-BUDGET: ADOPTION,APPROPRIATION,SET PITKI�i �OUNTY MILL LEVl'-MOTION TO APPROVE-Commissioner True noted for the record Pitkin County does not know what G�eld County or Rio Blanco County are proposing � in the budget, . � Commissioner Ireland moved to adopt the Budget for 1996. With a second from j Commissioner Lamont,the motion passed unanimously. ; Commissioner Ireland moved to appropriate the moneys contaieed in the Resolution for a total of$7,42U,000.00. With a second by Commissioner Lamant,the motion passed , unanimously. � Commissioner Ireland moved to adopt the Pitkio County Mill Levy as 3.053 for the _ General Fund,.374 ior the TV Translafor,.229 for the Logan Bridge,.080 for the Social Service Fund,1.761 for Open Space and.619 for the General Obligarion Debt Fund for a ! total of 6.116 plus the described special districts herein. Commissioner Ireland moved to - adopt both Mill Levies for 1996. With a second by Commissioner Lamont,the motion passed unanimously. p-' ! . '�, FiRST READING-PFANE STEiL ROAD CONVEYANCE-MOTION TO APPROVE � . + ' Commissioner Lamont moved to approve the first reading and set for public hearing on � December 20,1995 the Pfanensteil Road Conveyance as Described with a caveat to work , out language on the road for a second reading and as amended from the iast time wc sought to embody the changes we had before us and as described by Jane Ellen Hamilton • ' ,- and Attorney Edwards. With a second by Commissioner True,the motion passed . unanimously. � THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THEN CONVENED AS BOARD OF i DIRECTORS ASPEN AMBULANCE DISTRICT-MOTION TO CONVENE . '�4. .�`:-; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSTONERS 3 DECEMBER 6,1995 ; !� � � �., A 4�:.i -/_ . ..._. ....s. . .. �t-�._ ` ...a _. .. . .. . ' . ... . .. .... . .... ,�:�� ,�. � . . . . ' . . � . , � . � ' . . o , � .�J � � .. � - .. . . . � . � .. . i; _.. � � ..� ` .1 . ' . .. . � - . .. . . : . 4:; '.�. � �, . _ ' _ _ ._ -: • ' �;. - . . �« •:� ��. '�=� .. -THJ,'qy'.y3 � �y ' �v'�� .. } ,ry �y �,y� �F`1�g7��y !�� .. :�'E AiW�t-i 1 1 /l.:�1h...1r,E�'1 M..�,, �y .p4i`.A .�}'�� y.�•.a�:G : .'tisrn+.:n.��r.TU6"��l�lF:�:gy��fYGNYL��hLLAr3 ` df � �,�,,;, ,.; j�� , : , � �`�, ; Commissioner Lamont moved to have the Board of County Commissioners convene as �1 � Board of Directors to Aspen Ambulance Distric� With a second by Commissioner True, '�� the motion assed unanimousl �" ' � P Y �"�� ., ( r...': SECOND RFADINC-ORDINANrF ADOPTIN FACF Af'RFFMFNT RFTVVi'i L'N t ! ASPFN AMBULANCF DI TRI AND ACPFnr vA Y HOSPITAI M(tTrclnr�rn 3' r' _ -._; APPROVE-Cl�airman Ireland noYed that this issue was reviewed on the first reading and there y were no probiems with the issues then. Chairman Ireland opened the heazing to public comment. There being no further discussion and no members of the public present,he closed - the public heazing and brought tlie matter back to the Board for aciion. ` Commissioner True moved to approve the second reading of the Ordinance Adopting j' Lease Agreement Between Aspen Ambulance Bistrict and Aspen Valley Hospital. With a ; second 6y Commissioner Lamont,the motion passed unanimously. �. ;,. , . �'HE BOARD OF OUNTY OMMIG�T(>NERS THFN AD O RN D A BOARD nF pIRECTORS ASPEN AMBUi ANCF DI TRTC'I' . � ADMINiSTRATIVF PUBLTC HFARIN �ECOND READINC-1995 RiTPPi FMFNTAL�UI�GET RESOLUTION MOTION TO APPROVE-Lynn Dunlop said this budget is essentially a compilation of the last six months of conceptual approval on budget changes. Duntop stated the County has been able to accumulate $173,216.00 for the payback to the Open Space Fund of$212,000.00 and hopes to have it complete by yeaz end. Ms.Dunlop proceeded with her presentation as outlined in her Memorandum fo the Board dated December 6,1995. A copy of the Summary is made a part of this record as Exhibit"A". Chairman Ireland opened the heazing on the Supplemental Budget Resolution. Commissioner Lamont moved to approve the Supplemenfal Budget Resolution which will .� '- —j-- - bring the County into an available fund balance of zero. With a second from Commissioner Ireland,the motion passed unanimously. � - �996 RFTA BUDGET APPR[1 RIATION AND ADOPTION R O UTTON MOTION TO APPROVE AND APPROPRIAT .-Dan Blankenship stated RFTA is seeking approva[of the 1995(Resolution 95-12)and 1996(Resolutions 95-]0 and 95-11) Supplemental Budget �' Resolutions. Blankenship proceeded!o review the 1996 Sapplemental BUdget ,�.' �`: . �:-; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMTSSIONERS 4 DECEMBER 6,1995 � � � " (� ' ' �- , � _:. k.., �..� n.�,.:.�� ,. ...... .. . ., . ,. _..._.., ,_. . :... . ,.. . _, __.�_�:�.z...�... ��►�x. rz . -.a � - . " � � � "'. , `, . _. r` � G . , E:-: l . , : � . ��: � : -.. . ._ . _ � ..�y�, . , . ;�r -- i _ .A � _1e,;.�..a��.�!,T�l�*�'i:��P,t,'n. y'� f.IN+�/"r�:c"k �.s. et'_} . �.ii.'.s+w_. ,`tiveS3.�-7�..'��a"r""ieli��3�5tt'�� '�,�.�i.sf'Mi�4�`N.'64"�fl�R�' i.r�. u .� i"�'�,__ , t� r '�i;4 •t.� � �. 'r�.,'��. '.•i r :;;`��s.'�si i' Bla�ilcenship stated total operating revenue is projected to be$8,416,108.00. The total operating 'i.`=.� expenditures are estimated to be$8,414,357.00 leaving about$1,751.00 surplus fund balance a �J._:�i a �','.'. _+ yeaz. The 1996 Budget assumes some funding will come from down vailey govemments totaling ,•,, �_� ;� $140,040.00. RFTA is still confirming those figures. If there is a shortfall because the + " ''�+''' ; governments do not give them the moneys requested,then the ogtion is to cut off service or raise �:'t,-.� ' the fares. ' f �: � Blankenship met with the City of Glenwood Springs and talked to their Transportation f Commission. ItFTA will have to go before their council and make a presentation to them "�� . � requesting funds totaling$85,000.00. They currently give$45,000.00. Blankenship is also :-;= meeting with the Transportation Authority for Eagle County to talk about how tl�e sales tax that ��`'�� was passed in November will be conferred to RFTA. RFTA has been told they will receive - approximately 90 percent of the amount collected in the Roaring Fork Valley apportioned to � Eagle County which is estimated to be about$135,000.00. Blankenship is optimistic RFTA can �1. obtain these moneys. Commissioner True moved to adopt the Supplemental Budget for 1996. With a second ,a from Commissioner Ireland,the motion passed unanimousty. l + �} Commissioner True moved to appropriate the described fees 58,416,108.00. With a second " R from Commissioner Lamont,the motion passed unanimously. � � i Chairman Ireland closed the public hearing of the 1996 RFTA Budget Adoption and Appropriation Resolutions and opened the 1995 5upplemental Budget Appropriation Resolution �;�, for public hearing. � Dan Blankenship stated this Resolution will enable the operating revenue to be increased $110,000.00 to a total of$7,860,903. The increases are attributable to greater amount of faze box revenue being received than RF'I'A estimated and the up-front payment from the ski company for the Two Creeks service. The resolution also reduces the aniount of prior year Operating Surplus required to balance the 1995 budget by$60,341.00. RFTA is also asking expenditures be . '3 allowed to increase by$49,631 for a total of 1995 operating expenditures of$7,860,153.00. _---- i � Chairman Ireland opened the hearing to public comment. There being no members of the public present,he closed the public hearing and brought the matter back to the Boazd for action. G� �. ' i Commissioner True moved to approve the Supplemental Budget appropriation. With a j, second from Commissioner Lamont,the motion passed unanimously. � ' ; HT R E T- T T PP �: (.�5�"t o� ��7.A��i �lr�c%� Commissioner True maved to continue and set for public heuring on December 20,1995. With a second by Commissioner Lamont,the motion passed unanimously. '�'� �. � BOARD OF COU1�iTY COMMISSIONERS 5 DECEMBER 6,1995 �� ;; �:�:,;,,. ��, �S; � �;:;.,. � 5.�:��.. — •..-�--.-_.4s::�� .,i:: �,n _. .. -, f, .. -:;:.� � . . . . ...��.lu , _.. .,. , . ,.,�,.. �� , . . . . . . _ q ] ,. �w. . . . . . . _ - . . ' ' }�"Y.• .'�. . . . � � � � � �.. � � . . � .` . . . . -._ . . � r��r � J . � . � � � : t � � - � � . . � � . . � , . ._i� '. ' ... . . � � . . � . . ' � � . � �.�. -� � ` � . \ � ; . . ' � . . . - . � . � .- � I � . ' � . � .. � . . . . - . . - . . . ' . , . � -��+�; , . � • � � . . . ._. . , •. ,1`ac��."T . . ' . � . . . . a�•,� . - . .._...j. .... . .._... . w��_.c ' L"C.4�'�u��i^�:rv S'{�t 3�," �' �''�S' S', s .�'ik�'�,`^��!l��"�k��C�+R[��,�9:�'' � �V i. . .:�e� ,`'9`'sc'St3] 3..� ��, ` ' � c„�.. ; y 1 � . - `�5,, ti±� 4 PUSLIC COMMENT. COIiMI86IONER COMMENTB. PROCLAMATIONBs - . + `: � � Chairman Ireland opened the hearing to public comraent. There being '~-�'� � no comment, he closed the public hearing and brought the mattex � - • { back to the Board for action. '. z` f �:.. ..�� Chairman Ireland opened the hearing to Commissioner comments. ! Commissioner Iraland congratulated the Aspen Avalanche and tha �' � Aspen Mother Puckers on their recent victories. It was the first _ � victory of the season for the Aspen Mother Puckers at 1a to 2. r The 24 of Aepen will be happening the week of December li throvgh hr December 12, 1995. Chairman Ireland asked for volunteers to help ij�:. with the 24 Hours of Aspen. On Sunday morning, December 10, 1995, ;`�;%�?,i -, - � the Uphill at Buttermilk will be held. � a � Suzanne Konchan stated Staff has been in discussions with the Hines g Development team about their upcoming hearing scheduled on the � 3 Highlands Land Use Application. Tim Malloy indicated 5taff and the { � applicant are still negotiating the proposal and would suggest a ° ' hearinq for Monday, December 18, 1995 or December 19, 1995. �, Commissioner Ireland asked how it would affect Aspen Highlands Ski � �. Area's master plan and rezoning for special review, Item No. 3 on � � the agenda. � Tim Malloy stated the rescheduling would not affect Item No. 3 on ;� the Agenda. - � ''' 7►fter a diacuasioa, it raa decideQ Deaember 19, 1995 xould be the � hearing date. � r Commissioner Ireland requested to see memoranda on the items to be i' - discussed on the 19th well in advance. Tim Malloy said he 6 anticipates the memoranda will be ready three or four days before ` the meeting. � I+AND II8E ACTIONB� ' � :� � 6�: ,� ---;� PFANENBTSIL (LOT 91 1041 HAZARD REVIEW AND tiENBRAL SIIBMZSSION - ; � lioTioN TO ApPROVE AND AMEND - Rick Maqill, Planner, said the Board � at the November 29, 1995 meeting expressed they did not have tima � to read the packet and thus rescheduled the hearinq for the i� December 6, 1995 meeting. Rick Magill summarized the issues as °= outlined in his memorandum to the Board, A copy of this memorandum � is made a part of this record as B�TBZT ��8��. , $� Commissioner Ireland asked Rick Magill if it is appropriate to allow access across the wetlands. Magill acknowledged access is appropriate. i ;: - `a:, ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 6 DECEMBER 6� 1995 � '�=' ri � - �.. �y �� !•i i' / _- _ ."�"—'..+e-?'..;w,-+ �"'a.._::%X6 JY+:4.:"'+.:eraS ...J::4� r.....,. . ,.c�... .J....-,. . I. ,....... �...,. -_.,.-.—.�. —'.'—. � . � _ .. . . . . . . Y . . k:..;. �y � � . . - . . ' tt .'�.' J . . . . . . � . . .. , � . � . . � _... - . J„`�. �. . , . . � ' . . . . . � _ . . . .,.<..-.. \ � .. ' .. � �, � � . . . . . . . -?��; - . . . . , � . . .. . . . : r .. . . . . � . . � .- -� ... _� . . . .�i._ �. ... � . � � '. � . ._�.. : . � � . � . .�- � � . � � ., • •.�� . . � - . . . 'P„r .. .._.,_ . ____ _ . _._ ;'=`•:; ` , ' . � _ . __._ . _ .." r.. ..�.� iy,'"iT��L=`� �� 1 i Y4i �i � �•' .;'��;� Commissioner Ireland asked Jeff Beir, attorney for applicant, if '!" he had read the conditiona attached to the Reaolution for 1041 � Hazard Review and General Submission. Mr. Beir acknowledged that ��`• he has read the conditions and represented that applicant is in �":�'� i� agreement with the conditions as stated in the Resolution. j•'"�-�,. ..� ,,:, " Commissioner Lamont stated there were conditions stated in Jeff 1 Beir's memorandum concerninq the wetlands. Applicant agreed to amend Item No. 18 to include specific refarence to the bridqe to !' be consistent with the Army Corps' recommendation with respect to �'�: :- , the wetlands spanned by the bridge. =.`-: ,..-•. __. t.c Riok Maqill stated Commissioner Ethridge requested Staff to acquire i�'-'�` some topography on height differences for the different building ��"•<� - sites. Staff did acquire the topography on the area at two-foot ! .� � contour levels from Tom Newland. Rick Magill said there really was ?�' � not a lot of difference between the accessory envelope and the t- .�� extreme top buildinq site in relation to the stream bed elevation. � 5? � Chairman Ireland opened the hearinq to public comment. �' � :� a . '� Commiasioner Lamont moved to adopt an amendment to the Resolution � � to iacorporste tha Armp corpa o! Engineera� aonaerns 3nto Paraqraph ;wj 18 of the Resolution. With a seoond by Commissioner True, the � :� motion passed unanimously. { � Commisaioner ireland moved to adopt the Ordinanoe as amended. IPith � 3r a saaond by Commissioner True, tha motioa passeQ uaanimouslp. � Commissioner Ireland then closed the public hearing in Pfanensteil :� (Lot 9) 1041 Hazard Review and General Submission. � � Commisaioner Bill Tuite arrivad to the meeting at approximately ! - "� 5:�5 g.m. to make a quorunt oE four conmissioners. j � AD&RBACHER 1041 HAZARD REVIEW AND 6SN8RAL SDBMI88ION - MOTION TO ' APPROVB - Brian McNellis reviewed the Auerbacher 1041 Hazard Review ! and General Submission and Caretaker Dwelling Unit as outlined in � s his Suma�ary. A copy of Brian McNellis� Summary is made a part of this record as SRHIBIT ��C��. � ^� Commissioner Ireland asked where is the proposed accessory building envelope for the caretaker unit? Mr. McNellis stated the caretaker unit is going to be attached. Commissioner Ireland expressed concern with the building envelope being rather large. The � ! building envelope is approximately one acre in size with a 13 percent slope. • . The snow avalanche rating is neither a red zone nor a blue zone. ' � t BOAT2D OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 7 DECEMBER 6, 1995 � ;�;� : � t:._ . � i: �: ��. a,. � ,.,....-.^.-- ' ---•"._ . '_..,.;�.....:.:.....,�� . , . ... . . --'�-- . - , / ' _� � u. .,. .....�_. .�.��...�,Ee.._.._ r�,:.� � . �1 `. -+ . ` - - � • ` ., � . ' . � . . - � , �� . =i; . ., � � ' . . , ' . . . �. .. . • . � . � - � r . �y�: - .. . ' . . ... . . _. . . . � . � , . . ,•yi.K..{-0 _ . . _ ' ' . . � . �P' ,� . }� .. __ i. __..___..��,..�.� �� ^ , J 7� � .• � � .. .. 4 . ,... . � n �.�.!.h. ..;�t��.�.�a;��..1��Va. 1 �4.�YyP.:_ •:�.. i=�; -rY,l�:. .2,..."�� :.:�..-., �a+ev:,:!$b�JA:tn�uKr.l�{-7?1.�Jt_ketw.V:kkt�,7raW.•a�r .. �.-..,.... i'a., '.i��.., .;i,. e.' �� ,•y:��.i Commissioner Ireland asked what 3s the vegetation level on this _�?'I�`- . property? Francis Krizmanich, Planner, stated it was dryland grass u;; .� on the lower portion and Juniper trees on the upper portion of the ;-';� .�� property. Mr. Krizmanich also stated the fire hazard would be � moderate to severe above the ditch area. �•'��' � " .i.+� '�c :., ,`: �� Commissioner Lamont asked if there is access indicated into the ��y-;, building envelope. Mr. McNeZlis stated access has not been 1 ! °' � identified yet. E �; .- !' � � + Commissioner Ireland asked if there is a house size limitation on ,,. ° � this lot? Mr. Krizmanich said there was no limitation but because ` �" � the lot is very long and narrow, the house will probably be � constrainad in size because of septic design and setback requirements from the well and lot-wise, Commissioner Ireland asked which half of the lot was the critical � � habitat area. Mr. Krizmanich stated the upper portion of the lot �,Yy was the map's critical habitat. Commissioner ireland reaommended the buildinq enneiope be a littla � amaller becauae of the critical habitat. ,� ? Mr. Green stated the applicants are willing to move the building �? - enve2ope down a little more towards the road. Commissioner Treland moved to amend the Resolution to impoae a ti requirement the buildinq envelope be relocated approaimatelp thirty � to fifty feet downhill toward the road at both enQs and the � Resolutioa to otherwise remain as it is. With a second from •R• coomissioner Lamont, the motion passed uaanimously. ``� � A discussion ensued on the caretaker unit being attached versus ; detached. ; 3 Zt �ras decided the caretaker unit should be detached beaauae o! ; the location of the esisting ve1L ; Commissioner Ireland moved to amend the applicant be alloved to � ---�� detach rather than attach the aaretaker unit xithin the building envelope and the IInit is aot to eaceed 700 square feet. Also, the I plans are subjeat to review by the 8taff and thea are to be submitted to the Chairman of the County Commissionera for his , . signature. With a seaond lrom Commiasioaer Lamoat, the motion pa$aed unanimously. � Mr. Auerbacher asked if there were problems with him having a dog '-� ' on the property. Commissioner Ireland said it is a problem. StafP p recommended prohibition on dogs qiven the mapping and the k � De artment of Wildlife's r� p (Kevin Wright) comments. The Staff �. � suggested Mr. Auerbacher could discuss the dog issue further with __ � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 8 DECEMBER 6, I995 if '•-?'�' � }r j' 3 a �� ti :,' : . ��:. � u r».>..+ .«_.r1..i...: ......,, _ rrw..n_ .�r � .L _« .....+. .. .., s u�. •.;u._e.._ .-._.�.x�. _-. ... ,�� 4, —R . . ' . . . . . ' . � . r::;�. . � - - .. . ' .. . . . . 7i�. _ . �� . . . . . ��` J �' . . •. , . � � .. t� �'. , � i . . � _ . .. . . � � . _ . . '� . . � � � � � - � . . � . ' . - . .. ..:��; . . , . . �: . ... ._. _ _.- : . . - . .. . . �. . ' I - , .��n•..�a . . , . . . . ' . �a'�` +R' , � %c�� .. .. __. _ ' .. . � . ...r�r�.:.:A._ _...:��.?yK.�.t�'3u^,t�4.aM'.:.�:YZ:kY.i'r397Y�k]:4�; ��rA��i'. 5.�:. 't �� y[ �4.��- F..ti � . �� ..��r� �= . � Kevin Wright and if later on Kevin Wright was oP the opinion that ;: �'� it was no longer critical because of its close proximity to the '•.s -s. existing development, then they should process a map amendment to ;;,.�� - show Staff that the habitat has changed and it is not a critical �.� :'•'... area any longer. '�. '`z u ' ; �4�:.�.,• Commissioner Ireland stated the County could approve application `:� , f..: � if Kevin Wright with the Division of Wildlife says the neighborhood �f;=�`. ;: � has changed and dogs are no langer a critical issue. zj '. A discussion ensued with regard to the approval process for dogs ,�, � being allowed on the property. - ,.:;_:, It vas aqreed the Countp vouid entertaia a ahanqe based on the - Department of Wildlife's deaiaioa. ; i `� : � Commisaioner Ireland moved to approve the appliaation as it is �rith txo amendmenta: (1) moving the building envelope, and (2) a 77 detacheQ caretalcer unit aubject to 8taff�s ranie�r and aigaature by ,. � the Chairmaa pith the approval of the Staff. 1Pith a aecond from Ci� .r; � Commisaioner Lamont, tbe motioa xas passed unanimously. , � a COTE 1041 HAZARD REVIBW AND GBNSRAL BIIHMI88ION — MOTION TO TAHLE � - Rick Magill reviewed the Cate 1041 Hazard Review and General `� �1 submission as outlined in his Memorandum. A copy of Mr. Magill's _' Memorandum is made a part of this record as S�ISIT ��D��. _ °x �a Mr. Magill stated Randy Cote pointed out the fences currently � existing on the property do not comply with DOW�s standards as ° y required by the 1986 1041 Approval. There is a five-bar fence on ;�� the property. The applicant has agreed to bring the fence into � compliance prior to the issuance of the buildinq permit. :j • � Randy Cote also indicated that although dogs are prohibited in the � initial 1041 review, he contends dogs would be okay all along if � they were kenneled. Staff does not feel compelled at this time to j• - � change the condition of prohibition of dogs although Staff need's � to research the Code as to whether it allows the kenneling of dogs . ; � within a quarter mile of an elk migration corridor. A copy of � ' Randy Cote's letter is made a part of this record as E�IBIT �'En. ,` ,� ; --- ;� Mr. Cote was asked his opinion on which building site he preferred. � Mr. Cote is in agreement with Staff's and Planninq and Zoning's ' i ' recommendations for the building site. Mr. Cate stated he has i brought his fence into compliance by taking out one of the wires �_r , � in the fencinq. ' { i � Commissioner Ireland questioned again what Staff's recommendation I is on the issue of dogs. Staff recommended to uphold the previous �. 1 condition of prohibition of dogs. , � u. ;,�:-. � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 9 DECEMBER 6, 1995 + •��; i -_ ` I � . l _.... __ .��.�....------_—_-_--- _ ; - ... :._.... .::.-: ....- , _ -:J....,. � ,,...._ ' " ..�r � `��`Ni i .. / . . .. . . . ... ' . . - . � .` �. . . � �i� i,�. � • t. ._ �{ J 1 �. - � : . � , • , i • , . .. , � _, .. .._. _^ . __.- :_!: - . ��: ' idk.��' :�2 .. �.—,.-i �. ��C: ' ..��9stlli'��•r.'Y3 c... i_fi`»s�`r_ ,, .. .3: ' , ✓v .. ;.,{J.FS;a:.s�['�_�':„'w;ok�:t�:'.,.�'.?:L':kHsllvns:.�ti:n�rs,•,tnn,.-�-.r�..- ^,s r � .�; � ;:i • i. `�S', p. _ A discussion ensued on what Code says about kenneled dogs in this < area. `;i� � .. -' It nas aecided the Soara woula need more information lroa Ran3p �;�,�i-� -�; Cote aoncerning prohibition or non-prohibition of doga. Researah � rill 3one from the oriqinal tranacripts and tapea. j1. -.:�. � Commiasioner Ireland reaommended this item be tabled lonq enouqh • : for sta!! to research the doq iasue. � Hr. Cote stated there is a survey line that goes inside the fence ��,, mark and Mr. Cote would like to get the approval to anything inside � - - the fence. �'� � I._ � Commissioner Ireland opened the hearinq to public comment. Commissioner ireland moved to table this item and aontinue the public hearinq in the Cote 1041 Ha$ard Review and Geaeral • 8ubmisaioa until December 20, 1995. With a second by Commisaioner Lamont, the motion passed unanimously. Lotta Reina requeste3 prior to the meetinq, sinae he xould be � uaable to attend the publia commeat, to present the Couaty # Commisaioners vith a letter durinq publia comment. Lotta Reina � submitted aome doaumentation aoaaerninq the Stapleton Ditoh Pipe and runniaq saovmobiles or snowoata over the pipe for groominq tbe � Nordic Trail. Chairmaa Ireland stated they vill addreea this problem. � BECOND READING - ASPEN HIGHLANDS SRI AREA MASTER PLAN REZOIQING AND � SPECIAL REVISW - MOTION TO APPROVE - Francis Krizmanich stated this • � is the second reading and public hearing for the Ordinance to Rezone the Aspen Highlands Ski Area. It is an AFR-10 to AF-SKI. Mr. Krizmanich reviewed the Ordinance as outlined in his Summary. A copy of the Summary is made a part of this record as E�IHIT ��F��. A year ago, the County approved some upgrades to the Highlands, � ; , including two new high-speed quad chairs to the top of Loge. , _______.___. Additional improvements approved were a mid-mountain maintenance � facility and some utility trenching but those items were not put in place. The Master Plan was put on hold at Staff's recommendation because part of the approval for the additional lifts required monitorinq during those last years before the 1995 • ski season. The Planning Commission reviewed the monitoring reports and was quite pleased with the survey. Staff has come up � with some recommendations based on the Planning Commission's ' review. Staff feels further review should be required for any activity that increases traffic. The Planning Commission recommended that the Hiqhlands continue to monitor at least through this year with some modifications: traffic counts should be BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 10 DECEMBER 6, 1995 �',�,;,; ` � g ',� � e � . ' . . ,,......,..___ ... . ' ___ ._..`....n:...;L � _ �... '�.a:. ..._�_..:-,� .,.,..,._; -,-. L � i...� / .. ..r . . _ . .�....,. . .. ... . .... . , , � l4� y� �,i � ` i� 1 . . . , . . . . � . �.i_�,�.'. . . . . , ` , , _ . . . . . _ � J _. . . . . � . . � ' . , � . - '. ,, ' . � � � � � . • � � . � -��, - .. . � � • ' . � r - -- . . ; _ . __ . r . 1�� ' , r�,d. r , � .. ,. , ' 1lkJ �r ` . ,..��'l�� .�i:Ylli��.. ....� .. .... �, �;-L�1�_.".N�1' •at:.:_�;•CSM�aIfMA�Jt..s:e:hr��<.�L': � ... . �K'�SP�Yi.rrr �. . . � - - �� ¢ptF�+, . r.;.�.:,'::�.��. �i �?��t` related to particular days, whether they are high use days or low �`�-.�: use days, so a comparison can be made on the amount of cars or if �_,. � transit was utilized. The Planning Commission also wants a more ;,,".�� ; detailed accounting of skier drop-off. '� �� i�'�.;:'�,� The applicant requested, and the Planning Commission agreed, that � the County should work with the app2icant to provide more "no � -� � I parkinq" eigr�s along Maroon Creek Road. This was also requested ��.�..� .�. by representatives of ttie Highlands neighborhood. L:_�.; - - The improvements at Highlands did result in some skier increase. �„z, - The Highlands expects to see similar increases as the liffs are � upgraded. � Staff has hesitated approving the Master Plan because of uncertainty with the traffic mitigation plan that ties into the f": whole Base Villaqe and the ski mountain. �' As far as the Master Plan, the zorsing spells aut what is to be F '•r . . allowed and what the uses are, what uses will be under further review. All additional lifts come under the "further review" , category at the present time and that would include other aspects; �. i.e., the expansion into Steeple Chase and Maroon Bell and other � � areas. • � Staff is recommending that the County rezone Highlands AF-SKI but � that Staf£ amend the Ordinance rezoning it so it states while the rezoning is granted, the Master Plan is not approvad and further � improvements cannot take place until there is a final master plan. This would give the Highlands the benefit of having the zoning that is appropriate for the area. The other aption would be for the �s Board to approve the rezoning and the Master Plan at this time with g _ leaving it the way it is: further review and the applicants would f still know prior to any liEt being installed, a traffic plan would ; be implemented. j 5 Mr. Krizmanich stated Staff would like to see the nine conditions listed in Francis Krizmanich's Memorandum of November 15, 1994, , � labeled "Master Plan Aetails,'� addressed by the Ski Company. A `� j copy of the Memorandum is made a part of this record as $BHIBIT ---��"-".: ��G��. Staff's prime concern is the traffic and how it relates with � the base area. Staff's impression is that the 2.3 person per car hurts the ski , company. Staff suggests Highlands should stay with 2.5 persons per � car and continue to monitor the traffic. , Mr. Glen Horn, Planner, spake concerning the Master Plan. Mr. Horn r . . concurs with Mr. Krizmanich's recommendations regardinq changes to the Master Plan. There are a couple of exceptions Mr. Horn wanted to be explicit about. With respect to the school lift, it is not ; '�. ! BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSTONERS 11 DECEMBER 6, 1995 i ,�°�;: ?� � : � I's f' � � ; i e !.:; . -•-- - _. ,.�-� -r-A--- .W_.. : __.... -�. .._.. ,.._.__ _....._._______ ;1�` ,... u � . � � -• .. . . • ; `, . :` � � � � � • _ . . . " : - ---_ ,_ . _ : � �: . . . ,:�*tm . - . �'{� ,_ ��, ..._.._I __—•__ _. -.... ......... . . iY'.. � �]'(�Z.` ,�J (•y [ c'. '� , going to be addressed within the environmental imgact statement '��'��'' _�� . because it is entirely on prfvate property. It has been approved " - by the conceptual review committee and cannot be constructed until -t;, _ it goes through the detail review as part of the Moore PUD process. : ;�s j The school lift is not an initial aspects lift. It is a delivery ; �._, ' lift of skiers from the schools to the day care area. The school i.c�y,; '. • � lift cuts down on traffic. The people at the schools will be able ' to get on the lift and travel to the base and from that point ski �$� down and get on an initial aspects lift to the ski area. {(':: ;� ' The other change has to do with the maintenance building and the 4{ _ utility corridor as uses by right. They are listed in the Phase �-�~' ' ii portion of the projeat and the condition language suggested that �,,; . Phase II would be uses by further review but Mr. Horn stated Mr. �.;,.;;', Krizmanich said he felt comfortable with the particular actions ` - - being put in the uses as approved by right cateqory. The general � ?� thinkinq in the development of the Master Plan is that anything � � that would result in off-site impact related to transportation ` would go in the "further review" category pending the outcame of �� the transportation/remote parking issues and the outcome of the � draft DIF which should present findings and recommendations with � respect to the new lifts. With these comments, Mr. Horn asked that ;i � the Board approve the Master Plan with these changes. l� a i; ' Commissioner Ireland is concerned about the survey on the parking f. ;; lot in that 40 percent of the people who did not use public " transportation said they would not consider using it next time and � wants to know why they wouldn't use it. Commissioner Ireland would like to see data collectors at the Highlands treated to the same A kind of information they obvipusly did at Buttermilk because it � would give the Highlands an estimate on number of parked cars there � � that are not generated by skiing. He thinks the data would be ;; useful for both areas. Commissioner Ireland would also like to see Pa little bit less sophisticated treatment of the number of people � riding in the cars. He is wondering if on high impact days when Y the lot is full, the average number of people goes up. That would � tell the Highlands too, when things are limited to people who are carpooling. If they do not carpool, that tells us something else -- maybe they cannot. There is not enough incentive � to make them carpool. But if they respond to that pressure, then �. it tells us the pressure works and we can proceed from there. ' � Commissioner Ireland says the Board is pretty much in concurrence on the Phase II, what is to be reviewed and what needs to be reviewed. � Mr. Krizmanich stated the Ski Company is concerned abont the items , ' that Staff approved by Resolution 94-87, primarily the mid- , mountain maintenance building. The Land Use Code now says that special review approval is good for one year. The Ski Company is t concerned the approval of the construction of the mid-mountain { „'. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER5 12 DECEMBER 6, 1995 ;�,:.. : :t.,; • 6 ` : � ' . i �:;` , � '__'.._--...._.._.......`.:-.-...� . .. ... ....:�.,.�, �:��;..,,....,...:,:: < �„..:;.�_. _'_' -....<_�._�__.� .... --_ _y a (/ l��E ..__.,_ . �.:'. .� . . . . T r J ��G✓ i _ . ' � . - . . . � � . ' . � ' . . . t c... . J ^ . . � . . . . . . ' _ . . _ .�1. . � _.. � ��.�, , . . . . . , . . . .. . . � _ , � . . . . . . � ... � . - � ' , � . . � � . �� . � �. . . ' , . ' . . . .. ' ' . . � t . . C'�.: . ' . � . . . � ' . �h��•a , . . - . . � . . }�r . .. �.___._._,�.- ��il±.s ... .�'. " / � � n . . ��^ �,�cJy}.. �Si :.✓:.�-�� ,! �, . �-.. :,:.� � M a�_" �-._� maintanance building will expire before they complete the project. ~;;,�`�� Mr. Krizmanich views that section of the Code to mean: the Ski �-`I' �-�: :,-�. Company has done approximately half or more of what Staff has ,;�;.; .,� approved; therefore, they have begun the approved activity and it ,„ ... .�� would not expire. Otherwise, the StafP is in agreement as far as I ;"� � the actual plan itself, i'-'��>''..y ; ��., " . ` Commissioner Ireland noted that onl 16 � �� y percent of the users said '�4"{,,., 1 paid parking deterred them from skiing Aspen Highlands. ; tt.?. ; f a i _ } Commissioner Ireland o ened the meetin to g. s p g public hearin There ;� w: being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and brought r.;;f�>'.. -.. the matter back before the Board for action. � Commissioner Ireland stated the County needs to check on the F � parking situation on Maroon Creek Road. There has been a lot of progress in this area and the Board wants to keep the progress up. �� • �,:: The Aspen Ski Company submitted a letter to Pitkin County ��'� �concerning not wanting to use Iselin Park as an indicator of -t ' overflow at the Aspen Hiqhlands. ' A member of the pvblic Frank stands by not using Zselin Park for `'�1` � parking as Aspen Ski Company has no control over it. �. „-�a _ t�, Commissioner Ireland stated Staff has been using Iselin Park as an � indicator of overflow. Mr. Krizmanich feels the Ski Area gave its best effort in s � controlling parkinq and that some people will find p2aces to park. �: � He feels it is somewhat of an indicator of overflow but also finds � it hard to lay the responsibility on Highlands because people are ��''°� V�... creative in finding frea parking spots. A discussion ensued concerning overflow parkfng in different city parking lots. Commissioner Tuite�stated he felt the Board had enough information � concerning parking. ' , �';.__ Commissioner Ireland concurred there were enough tools to assess �� the parking issue. '+ 'j, Commiasioner Tuite moved to approne the ameadment that the Board - . xill not uae Iselin as a criteria for approval. With a seaoad from Conmisaioner Treland, the motion pasaed uaaaimousip. Glen Horn stated he wants the Board to be explicit about the Moore '. ' Lift and also the utility trench. He wanted to know if this was part of the motion to put those facts in? � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 13 DECEMBER 6, 1995 �� F`. �;_ `^. f `_._�_ - _�_.._,__.......� , . . . . �,_......:. �.,.c_..:..._.._.;_,.d:._ ��,,.:..w........,�::`::s �":.,:��-� -- ----__�"'�.�.:. � . • � Y : i -, � . � .. . . . ' . . - . I�ii` - . �1 � � .� . . . - � � . . .. ' � . � � 5 :.' a�. 'I � � .� � . � � � t• . � . . �.. � .. �•.C �. . � � , � . . , ' . . - . . �e• _ � . , . �. . � _ . �. . - . . . • . . � �. � �, . •.- �. _ . . , . . .,_... _� -.. .-_�-_ - . � . . _ . .. ._ . . _, _ . � � ! � . . �: � � . , . .. � . . � .. . . .. . . � . . . . ' . ��;��„a. . . ' . .. , ., ,��, . ,y: __ --- - - ��.�.�..r.,.�.,, ._ � __ _ .. ;�. , � . ��, � �:��YAAF�i1�7>��.... . S'.�ti.�.. . �� •:;i:f - . ,...e ., � .rJ..f.iC..M:!��,..,..�::�n -•u�.�_.v.�...,.. r..,-.............h . . . . �,)}'`... 1; � - r�.-�" :��' �: !=::: :�.; Coaumissioner Tuite stated the motion was specific only to the ' ''" Iselin criteria. ;. :�.�� _ ! A , . � Glen Horn questioned what category does the Board want to place ('�•,�� • . ..�; the uti2ity trench an8 the Moore lift in7 r• .,� � ........�. � Tim Malloy stated the utility trench is no problem. It was - approved in Ordinance 94-87 and as long as it was that one, Staff " ! reviawed the alignment. �` � Commissioner Ireland questioned if the utility trench was by right? ,:`..`:::: :�r--. Tim Malloy affirmed the utility trench was by right. i Commiasioner Ireland moved to amend to allow the utility trenah ; identified and aqreed to bets�een Francia 1Cri$manich and Gien Horn, !V . �►hich had been approved in a previoua applioation, to be a utiliYp � trenab bp riqht. With a seoond by eommiaeioaer True, the motion �t pasaed unanimously. �� Glen Horn stated he would like to know where the Moore Lift stands. ` Commissioner Tuite said if the idea of the Moore lift is to move � cs the school children up to the ski area so they do not qet on cars, � �� it should not be part of the County's traffic review. He said he � did not hava a problem with keeping it exempt from the application. ;3 Tim Malloy stated the Moore lift had been approved in qeneral � submission. He feels a few more things need to be discussed � relative to it, that being its relationship to the adjacent home � subdivision. The applicant, in tbe review, implied there is a greater transit benefit to the lift than is being discussed. The ` - applicant said there may be persons from the Moore Subdivision, Aspen Hiqhlands Subdivision and the Meadows that might use the lift. Glen Horn would like the Board to put in the use by right subject to a detailed submission in the Moore application. i �_._______,:. Commiesioner ireland moved that the 8kf Schooi Lift be allowea bp ` � right subject to the detailed reviered of the Moore Bubdiviaion 1►ppliaation. With a second from Commissioner Tuite, the motion pasaed unanimous2p. Commissioner Tuite moved to resone the property, as amended, i.e., tbe utilitp ditcb, the Moore Lift, and to exclude the vehicles in � the Iselin parkinq lot as the criteria determining tha overflow of • the parkinq lot at Hiqhlands. With a aecoad from Comm3seioner True, the motion passad unanimously. BOARD OF COUNTY COMAIISSIONERS 14 DECEMBER 6, 1995 ! �;; i ; - � s. t :'-. . . . . � ''�.�• . i `; � . :..........�.._ ..__.-__�. .�:. ,.....,.�.-� ....,.,�.�:. . � . ..... .. -._.-°---•-•' i / . . .._,.._...., .._ , ., ...... ,_..,.. ....., ..-...... . ..__.. � �'1�* . x . _, . . . . � . . S f _ 1 . , , .- r ' � . . . .. .. ... . - � , . I ', J � '',, .: . � - . . . .; . , . .. .. . . .� b . . ..- . �. . . . ..__ .. . . . . . t . . . � . . � � ' . - . ` . . . . . . . ' . . '}- - .. �. . . . . r . . � . . -- - . .- ... . � ..-.' � . ! ��: . . . . .. . . . t}�'�.%� ' ; . � - . � . .t.. " i� , . _...., i -rrr�r-�°�- . .._..._a .. +S"'�� i . .�ti�•. . _.,t�.'�"'14'ifi'�.2E:�- �-i..��w� � . ��, ,,. � . ..a . . �u:kf kfiv�¢�'.�:�.'�"�i,��:ik'l$?C"e��u�6'W�'��e2»�I&Y�i�tL'it�i�.an+t�'-_.' sy�,;i��• . _ '-':,..j;�._.�}i? .i . -1� . ��, R��' •iu Coauaissioner Lamont stated what Francis Krizmanich is recommending ; ` • the County to do originally is to rezone the property. She �•`-�: , understands we are not only rezoninq the property, but the County ;�;..?� is adopting the master plan subject to conditions. G• ;:'... ::' �-..:y,: � ,� Francis ICrizmanich said he concurred. He .stated the biggest - • ;;i stumbling block was improvinq the lifts and acquiring a cohesive `-' ' . ,.: _. transit plan. His impression from the latest round of ineetings f:'' .,. ,: :� with the Ski Company is they are serious in going forward with the - - � transit plan. And with the lifts and other major improvements r � being further reviewed in the master plan, he is fairly comfortable t�;�- � the master plan can be adopted. In other words, all the lifts and .:;"..;:.: ; other improvements are not going to go forward until the Ski -;;::;:,^,, � Company obtains the traffic plan. '� : � Glen Horn concurred this is his understanding too. .:c Commissioner Ireland stated applicant clearly understands that � . further obligation to planning can go further other than the �` -, _ � current facilities. A'� � Glen Horn acknowledged they understood. � � Commisaioner Ireiand moved to amend hia notioa to aaopt the master `� plan, the aaster pian as amended as conditioned by the conditiona of the conclusion packet Item Nos. 1 through 9, and adoption ot the � resoainq as amended by the three itema. iiith a second froa Commiasioaer Tuite, the motion passad unanimously. � ' Fred Smith requested a scheduled work session soon after Christmas � to discuss transportation and parkinq issues for the Aighlands Ski 4�;�` Area and other associated issues. � Commissioner Ireland said there was a problem with that because the County has approval pendinq with the Highlands. � A discussion ensued concerning have a work session versus a public hearing. , � .. Stan Clausson, Community Developer, City of Aspen, stated he would ----- like a work session where Highlands issues would be melded with ' other transportation issues. Commissioner Ireland stated he would prefer to notice a public d - hearinq for daytime hours. Commissioner Ireland said in the month E ' i of January a public hearing should be set for this issue. t_.• , I7► short break vas had bp the Board oi County Commissioners at 7:25 p.m. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 15 DECEMBER 6, 1995 ��"�; n i � ��'1, - I E�-�--- ---_ __ �.�.:5::,., ::�� r.....:w.,. ...:..:.:_��- •. --_- .... - �: - ._..� _ _..,._. . . (�+�,; ; �l � . . . .. . � � . � . � - • . � . 9 . � `� �i;:� � . � , �I J !� ,; • :��•y . ` � , ,, . , ...: ' ,. , ' � �- --- ._._ ._.- __ .. .�._; .�.�: . _ ; . . ,�' �„ ¢;Y. � . _ . - . . . �� " __ _-� .a _. . .�;- �• . . . � ...v:�:,�:' . . .. ' . ' ,...� .. ,... _�..:.»,.�.,,� __., ..�..,.........�,.�. � .�:i L`�,.�. � �t��'r�-' :�1. 'g`. • �-� Commissioner Ireland closed the pul�lic hearing on the Aspen ' �'S Highlands Ski Area. • � �. SECOND READIN(i - BALCOMB/gTBiHEN80N 1041 HAZARD RSPISW 6EN8RAL !�`� , '• $IIHMI88ION AND REZONTNCi - ISOTION TO APPROVE REZONIN(i AND liOTION TO '�°• 3 TABLE 1041 8A2ARD REV2Sp - Ellen Sassano, PlanneY, summarized the �.�=�' � issues as outlined in her Summary to the Board. A copy of this �` ".~ Summary is made a part of this record as 8$HIBIT ��H��. �;. . � Commissioner Ireland asked if the County has a recommendation from �- ' ___ _ ___ the Community Development Director. ` �^� , Cindy Houben, the Commuriity Development Director, said in terms of `�'� : a fairness issue, they did not specifically address voluntary � rezoning and, in this case, Staff can understand why a transfer would be al2owed to either area, either the down-valley area or the � metro area. Staff does feel it is the Board's policy and is the j' intent of the Zone District for any voluntary rezonings in the future to be located in the dowtt-valley area. i,• Commissioner ireland stated the applicant appZied to be part of a ''r , _ zone district that was the back of a land as opposed to � Independence Pass or anything else. � Cindy said there was a TDR proqram that was associated with the � _ initial rezoning which allowed transfers to the metro area. Commissioner Ireland said the app2icant was in a unique position. ' He also stated in this situation where there is a calving area and a migration, he does not want a 1,000 square foot cabin. ; Commissioner Ireland would like to have a TDR considered. � Commissioner Lamont wanted to know what is the down side to ' � transferring development into the metro area versus keeping it down valley. Cindy Houben said the intent of the rule was that the County should as closely as possible associate development rights to the area where they are generated. Development rights in the Frying Pan � area ghould be associated with a more down-valley location. ------------ bevelopment rights in the upper valley should be associated with ' � the metro area of Aspen. ;t , . Commissioner Ireland stated the applicant is clearly under the old - rural/remote zone and they are entitled to be treated under that ' zone. ; , Commissioner Ireland stated there is a request for the County to . table the 1041 Aazard Review. • HOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 16 DECEMBER 6, 1995 ;t:l.:-.. : j - � 4,. I �. . l-' . j / .---�-- - - -- ----j--- _.__� _..._ _. ;.� ....... .,<._. .._�_.._...- •_- x.'y - . . .. . . . . . ' . .. � �:. 5 .. � . � � - .. , .. � .. . `- ��... � . ' . .. � . ' � . � . � � � S.� . . ; , , . . � � � ' . .. ':�� . . .• - � 1 . � . �.. ' ' 1� . � . . . . . . '�' -.. .. ' . . : :.f ._ . - . . . . � ' �. .. � ♦ ' • � � . � � ' . ':�� " . � . . �� ' . � • �)' L :} .. .«"�' _- 1.�.�.,�n....r�.� ,y_�..._ k:?.:. ' . ' _ .. . . _..__ ._. . ___.._._...._._.__,Y.,,r,:ii;. f .y�, ' .' �:t` ;.;� .�i:t ' • Commisaioner Ireland movad to table indefinitelp the 1041 Sasard �!" . Review and aeneral submisaion. With a eecond trom Commiaeioner y �. � True, the motfon Mas pasaed unanimously. f • . �'� t Commissioner Irelattd moved to resone the property as rural/remote i•''",-�' ' ' rith the underatandiag that the reaeivinq aite vould be in the t .` •'- ]►apen metropolitaa area or doxn-valley at the discretion of the s,=' " applicaat. With a second from Commisaionar True, the motlon �ras �..". `: pasaed unanimousip. ° r L`.:�.. r::•si. . LAND IISB ACTIONB; � ___ .. :.r. HARDY BIIHDIVISION DETAILED BIIBMISBION - MOTION TO AMEND 711TD MOTION �% � To APPROVB - Ellen Sassano, Planner, summarized the issues as L,'�%:s:` • _ F outlined in her December 6, 1995 Summary to the Board. A copy of H the Summary is made a part of the record as E7�IBIT ��I��. � :a i � Ms. Sassano says there is one issue raised by Sonny Vann, attorney � for Gordon Hardy. He is requesting a conditions modification to i� j� condition i.a. on page 2 of the Ordinance. The condition limits ' � all development activity to the building envelope with some � i� exceptions. Mr. Vann noted the buildinq envelopes have been � slightly reduced from their size at general submission and given the fact that 7,000 square foot homes may potentially be built S� � within the envelopes, they may be somewhat restricted in terms of � ability to locate a septic system, a leach field and a well and ' � "� house within the envelope. Rather than expand the envelope to � � accommodate the sewage disposal system, Mr. Vann is requesting that the County allow the septic systems to be located in front (to the b � west of the envelopes) of the envelope, with approval by � Enviroxunental Health and Planning staff. Ms. Sassano stated she � � did not have a problem with the septic systems being located in that area as it will not impact any 1041 concerns. The preference . �� in the condition will be the septic systems be located within the building envelope if at all possible. Commissioner Ireland asked how close is the river in relation to the septic systems. , . Ms. Sassano said the river is not an issue at all. Ms. Sassano � � � said it may put some of the septic systems in a dry pasture area. —-- Commissioner Ireland opened the hearinq to public comment. ' Mr. Vann said the rest of the conditions are acceptable as drafted. , . . Mr. Vann acknowledged the applicant has read the conditions and are � . , i aware of them. ;• , Cindy Houben stated Staff can structure the condition to make it �' work. �t: I t� y`-c:: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 17 DECEMBER 6, 1995 ;�.,;, i I ,I., _ � :� ' ,' � �'�,, _ _ ...,..,..:w�__�,.�:��.�.>:_,�.�.... �,�.�..�:...,� -__..__.— ----.....:... r,: t._._ — . .b.....r�. .u;.,. �; � . , , �_ , � �. . . . . , � _ 'S�' � . . . . : .. . . . .. . . . . . . . " . +��. � , . . .' . � . ' - . . ' �. - . . . . .. . � . � � • � . . . . � 'S� . ' . . . ' - • � �.. � . ' • . . . ' • :�� " . . . _ . , �� , '"�'(�'J •.'r_.�i'��Yi.l�h�`i.lit�a'.�''�'�.,_ Z�..�'�"�,�'� .a; �Y.''. �k.� y,..'�� w,,.w.c::..:�7�.�'�llk�� n ::�� s'��i�'� 's,,, " ��r � �N1 S�. 1�� V :�•� . Commissfoner Irelan3 moved to amend the aondition as sugqested by : �. tho applioant to alior tLe septia system out of the builainq �'.;� ' anvelopa, if neaeesary, subjeot to approvai by the Planniaq '�� ` Direator and 8nvironmental Health before the Chairman �►ill siqn the { '�.y �7 approval. (Motion was never completed.) , ..} �•:�. .� Leslie Lamont had a question about the condition regarding the �;�:_,.:• .s; Midland Flume, that a trail permit is granted above the flume. Ms. Lamont wanted to know how does one get to the flume? � - - Cindy Aouben stated one must trespass on Dr. Hardy's driveway. � �`:; . : : Mr. Vann stated there will be another access point. An easement F;-.;.-- � will be granted across the Castle Creek Valley Ranch subdivision I next door to the Hardy Subdivision. i£ � Commissioner Lamont stated the only way to use tha public trail �7 � easement is.to go beyond the CCVR and get on the trail. ( a Commissioner Ireland asked why doesn't the County have a ! " ,y � recommendation to have the driveway join the road at a 90 degree � angle? � �y li Mr. Vann says this has been done. 3J ' ��"n Commissioner Ireland asked if there is public access to the link � ' �� through some other property, i.e., CCVR. �. � Cindy Houben says they do have a link. The link takes off from � � Castle Creek Road. She is not sure if the access is through the � first entrance or the second entrance. . - Mr. Vann stated the trail was a volunteered trail and was not dedicated to the subdivision. Commissioner ireland questioned whether the flume easement is suitable for use by cross-country skiers or is it just a trail? . ;�� • �. Mr. Vann says right now it is an old utility easement. : , i; , Commissioner Ireland would like to have the easement fully q described as a year-around easement and maintainable for that � _ � purpose. The County needs a fuller description and a map. ► . , , Comnissioner ireland moved to add the coaditioa that the County � , have a full description, map, definitioa o! use, and oonsultation • ritL the Hardys in order to maintain the trail as a aroea-covntrp trail in the future. With a aecond from Commisaioner True, the notioa passed unanimously. ` �:; I BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 18 DECEMBER 6, 1995 ' - � ,.'. 4>' _. 1;- , ;j � � i ,;:;....-.-------�----.....�.Y..•......��..<..�.,,.�..,:a�.. ....,...;.:::: _:,:.:_._ _,,.w.,,�........_....�,,....__. � . _..w. ��;t , ' . . . . . . � . . . - � . . . � � 1 .. � � A�_�r. . . . . . . . . , . . . ." . .. . �' . v ^ .. � � � � � � � . �. . .. .. � "- . .1�.. . �� . . .� � . . � . . � � . . : . � � _ . ` t , . . . . . . . . ' , . ". . .� _ .. � .. � . . .. . . . , . . - . . . ' . . . _ . . ' . . . . . . -.� ._�_. .._,._ ,_��..... .. �. .�i _.. . . _ _ . . �: � - � �.� •.. . . . . .. � � - . . .�-,H'�"'� . � ,f. • ��r ,_._�... ,.��.�.�-�-- �. ., . ��., .. .,,.. • ... � . � � . ' ....�o.....e......, ..,«+.en.eu�ri.w.e._<+».�..i.er.rru.rv..avn•r_i>�:{ _ ;s: ;.fy;: {t � .:� �1 �r��C's�.•1 - Cindp Houben atated that Commisaioner Ireland reaommeaded prior to �'.:'=,•.: aigniag the detailed eubmisaion approval, the Community Developmeat �_..�. ` Director trould aign off on the loaation o! the septia syatem. lls. i•''� '_ f Houden re ested the Count make a determination of iocation of the � �N Y }.:;:.;� septic and tia that to the fiaal plat approval. �� y: � Mr. Vann would like the condition to say that if the septic system ;< is permitted outside the building envelope, the determination be � ' " .�� ;;S_;'.:-:.' �; made prior to the building permit. ;,;;::.;: .. f: A discussion ensued as to designating the location of the septic �. - on the Pinal plat. � ' :=�:;- �:',;�''-;j-. Commissioner Ireland noned to amend the earlier amendment to :c:;='..- . � provide that there vill be a epecified qeaeral area for loaation of the seQtic outside the buildinq envelope and that approval of ' the locatioa of the aeptia syatem be a condition of issuance of the '` buildinq permit. With a aecond from Commissioner Tuite, the motion ;'.�� passed unanimously. � Commisaicner Ireland moved for approval of the Hardy eubdivision � Detailed Submisaion vith tvo amendmenta: (1) detailed mappiaq aad `� final planninq approvai of the desaription of the ski trail � � eaeement, and (2) the location of the septic spstem outaide the �i buildinq envelope within a desiqnated area subject to the description on the final plat ao the buildiaq permit vill not be ` ieaued until that location is approved bp Planninq and Snvironmental Health. With a second from Commissioner Tuite, the � motion passed uaanimously. 11WOIIRNMENTZ The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m. ,`� :�e. Re pectfu y submitted, r . 1��%c-(T�/�� L ne Cordova �s` Deputy Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners � — %I�� '�/ .�p � �, ' Michael C. Ireland, Chair•lman Board of County Commissioners _ ? • i Minutea:l2_6_952 • , •' , � 1�, W.,• BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 19 DECEMBER 6, 1995 _;' i�"; � ' _ ,,,.. I i ;� i ,4:.: -- - ti::.`.�: � �,.......:.:...�.. ,�__ . . ' , • ��. i ,, . � 4� , 1 _ t " : _ ��,, J � . . _, , \ i . I ' . � . .-. . — .<- . -. - . �. i - � � . ... . . . . � . . . �� . . . ' . ..- . -. . . . .. .. . , . � .., . ;�4�T , • , ' . . , . � . - � . . - �. >f. i� ,_ _. _... �.._._.,...�____ _ .��_ .'1�'�t�rP.3„�.YfR`�.ri'+��.":�..,Ek� el�,`._. �� /t..!"S�?�. 1�.._....-.a. Sfi.�i¢r'J.�d�LY�d'+13�t��ac�a�'�H:�i'i�.'4k'�.'-'$�d�a^�ti�i"`.;..... , ��e ds�;,v.i r..��r.� ,i,• � �i . '' � . f ;; H '�-60-J� �'.��'yl ':; Aceada Item 3ummarv '�- �{.c. ... � . . � . �,�. , Recular Meetina Date: DSC&'1�SR 6, 1995 E;`.•.,. 1 �,:,'.��•��. Agenda Item: SSCOND READING AND PUBLZC HEARING OF 1995 } SUPPLSMSNTAL HUDGST RSSOLI7TION �: "`_ . ___ __.i � Staff Rest�onsibilitv: LYNN DIINLOP �- ,.: . .��.. Description of the Item: ;y:-�;:'. � Thia budget resolution is an accumulation of budget changes which have Been conceptua2ly approved eince the Zaet budget resoZution in April, I995. All these changes total a net budget increase of $699,9I6, funded from various sources, as deacribed in the hody of the resolution. The net change to the general fund reduces its available fund balance to zero. Here are major budget itema within :; ��: � the resolution: '` . Z) There was only $ 26,000 savings from 1994. These and other funding sources (e.g., unfunded Ziabi.Iity pool and general � fund open apace deaignated fund balancea) were used to cover � a number of unexpected 1995 expensea, such as aeverance plus -- sick and vacation pay-outs for two upper management employees. �: 2) At the end of the ski season, we eatimated that another $44,700 wou�d be received in sales tax. We budgeted that amount buC don't believe that the increase will oacur. Other increased general revenuea should cover this over-es�imation. 3) We are trying to accumulate $ 252,000 in the general fund open � space reserve to allow us to pay-back the Open Space Fund for R. _ . its participation in acquisition of the Auster open space parcels. One reaource is the $ 120,000 we received from the City of Aapen from their snow dump 3and purchase. In 1995, we ti; _ have amasaed $ 173,216 and hope to fund the additional $38,784 ;ti from the county's ahare of increased building permit revenuea. 4) Revision to county housing activities and houaing conatruction projects, funded by payment-in-lieu-of-houaing funds. � '. �: 5) There are additional road projects, funded from prior yeaxs' -- --:�-; use tax collections, for both the county-side and Highway 82 share of Use Tax. , ` Staff Recommendation: Please hold the public hearing and approve this budget reso2ution � on aecond reading. ; j , i � Thank you. � !" � \lhdc\word\work\aga12-6 � i s,� � M.! y. � ..r��< � _ ` � � - � . �t . . . � � . � ... � q 'if. � � � . � . . . . F . . �, . . . . . ' . . . . . .. i t�.� � �� ' � . �� . . . . - ' .. � ��;. �4 . ' � � / '�$�:id�SIF•�.w':'ww«FR6r.Ib�SOf�L�i#��i�1+19,"�e��f��iT:cA- .. . .. ._ .. .., _ �-,x +�r�^'m4aae+s�e:y t ..�. f ,',.. �� . , �:.G' ...-s�'_,_�z:v vi.+� .i;�1"..,,�,..-�:�i�..-£i'�,�'.n�k��.�.�-RF''�yR; . . . . . . . �- - ;`�.�: _ . . .. . . _ �1''� , \ . ' .•t. .� . .. � - � � � ' �6 � . ` . f . S . f " �1 ' _ . .- � ' _ •' '.i �r . .. -� _ _ _ . . . , .^ '', . . � . _ � . . .. . � . � . . . �� . �� ._`__.. . . _�-�- .�.f:�__,.,. . . � . . .. . . .�- . � / . . . . . � . -. . �..� ._ � .. �-.._ . .. . . , - . . _ . .��: . . . . . . .. � � _ .. . . .. � . - • . . . r�.�'�cr,"�. . . . . . . . .. _ . .. . . .. .. . :..,�. . • . . �� , . - -�-�-! ."ti�,� � � ]Q�..:1. ' . ! � n . ... .�y�.. .,..........�. - .. . - ¢: , / '�Yf..��I. � • lJAri �"y � , t,4 �� } K&MORANDITI� �i'�,�:1(��; ,, �_ i� '"- �y�: .�•� :7 To: Board of County Commissioners ,,,�� Regular Meeting - November 29, 1995 � - �y:�,;,•'�. TBRII: Cindy Houben, Community Development Director '� � RH: Pfanensteil T,ot 9 1041. Hazard Review and General i;:�: submission "� '` �y� - FROM: Rick Magill, Planner ,..�..'.�:. �. �I '--- - `' 71PP7�ICADiT: Walter Pfanensteil (Grapetree Properties) s, 71PPLICANP�B R8PRS8BNTATSVB: Jeff Bier; Mason and Morse � � � � LOCATION: The project site is located in the lower Coal Creek Basin 79 � area, on the north side of Coal Basin Road. .s;-; �,: BACxGROUND: At the October 25th meeting of the Board it was " � suggested that Staff re-visit the project site for the purpose of � gathering more information on the environmental hazards to the � proposed building envelopes. Those hazards include wetland and "? riparian areas, potential debris flow from Coal Creek, and elk � � winter concentration areas, severe winter range, critical habitat, normal winter range, and elk production areas 1/4 mile to the north � of the property. These were the only issues outstanding for this ; � review. � ��R. On November 9, 1995, Staff inet on the site with Mike Claffey (Army Corp of Engineers), Paul Avant (Wright Water Engineers), Walt ; , • Pfanensteil, Jeff Bier, and Greg Baker. The results of that site i inspection were to be dooumented by Mike Claffey and the Applicant�s representatives and forwarded to the Planning Office for review and assimilation. The Piaaninq oftiae did not receive the documented results of the site inapeotioa ia time to inalude i them in an updatad 8taff m�morandum for tha BoarQ paaket (due �, Wednesday, November 22nd at nooa). � i Staff has since had the opportunity to review supplemental information from the Army Corp of Engineers and Wright Water Engineers. Staff also contacted the Division of Wildlife for j further clarification of the potential for wildlife impacts. In � ` ' addition, Tom Newland submitted a memorandum, supplemental to his Apri2 28, 1995 report, which further describes the potential Coal . ' Creek debris .flow hazard to the property. The above referenced reports are incorporated in the Staff Comments below and attached - j to this memorandum. i �ivea the availabilitp o! this aa3itional information and the ,,,; � Appiiaant•s requeet that thia raview not be aontinuad, Staft rould � �Q�-; � suggeat that the Board consider the intormation avmmarised belor -" , ��' j., � . t., ! : �:,', ' �-------- --- ,_...._. � _ , ,::, �,..._. _. ...._w.. .�._ �..,_ .<« � ..:,.a...r .:.,:...-. �. ,, _ -. . _ .,..h�. ,�. , .� %_ . . .. ...._ .. , � . � �yfi�4 �s��. . . .. : . . - � � 1 . -� ' . , � � . � '... � . . . . ' ti . J � . � � . . . - . .,. . . � . � ` , .. . .. _. � : . . � � ..:��`�;. . . . . . � ' ---- �� ...- - . . . . . .,. . '. . . ! . �: � � . � � . . . . . - . k� � - - � � �� ..� ET:' • '�� , _ i . .��._. ..rFd.}�_'P£;'.n3'S:uI'i.��f`.» `- .o.,d.. �.�. i". ':a`� � ,. '..a� .. a{.�,ff,t.:e�:ava'�2'.t7ri.;a5��:t('Mi`l7JlS�tPR�.u✓Y.' �.of -' 1A11LU9�sk LC:,74r..•r�5� � ' �1 .-f.": '��' 4 . � �.ar . ; and reviev this application at this time. "' �'�'�,�� -=t; - . BTAFF COMMENTS S . %�'i,,s -c-�. _ r' z,J Debris llor - Tom Newland points out that a debYis flow event can ;y,',:�•.-• cause a natural dam in a drainage by washing• down from side ~'�'u ; channels and settling into a berm across the valley. Water from the ; ',�:'' � i drainaqe can back-up behind such a berm until it breaks, sending � �"�`� water and mud down the drainaqe in a massive wave or pulse. Mr. � ' '�=`: r' Newland also believes that debris flow events in this area can be �fr�`� - .:1`_-��..- :� - ' more destructive than flood events because they consist of � water/mud/rock mixtures that can cause significant damage to �;R x � vegetation, structures and other objects in their path. Mike ? �k' Claffey indicates that while both envelopes appear to be relatively ��=''- � safe from normal flooding, a debris flow event could create a new ��}'�� channel in the riparian corridor which would pose a greater hazard i�k'.'' �r � for the accessory envelope along the valley floor. Mr. Claffey �T�+; �: confirmed on-site that the upper envelope would be the safest t!'%� • location for the residence, althouqh the access driveway could be i�'��p � impacted by a debris flow event. �'t` ' i ->.ti_ ! Staff pointed out a clearing to the west of the proposed accessory ;. ',�'� envelope to Mr. Claffey as a possible alternative building site. � y�: While this site appears to be removed from floodplain and wetland I• t-� areas, Mr. Claffey indicated that this site would not be advisable i � ' • as a residential site qiven it�s proximity to Coal Creek and the 3 above mentioned debris flow hazard. 'S Wetlanda -The Applicant is proposing to span a 20-30 foot section �' of the wetlands with a bridge. Mike Claffey indicates that crossing -.. the wetland in the area proposed by the Planning and Zoninq �� ,':�,-`� Commission and supported by the Applicant will not require an Army ;: . permit, provided there is no discharge of fi21 material into the wetlands. Mr. Claffey suggested that there would be no permanent damage to the wetlands if pads and/or matting are utilized during I the constraction of the bridge. Mr. Claffey also pointed out that � �,��, the proposed location of the accessory envelope may be appropriate for an agricultural building (barn) but it is not suitab2e for a �. residence given it's location relative to the wetlands. Hr. Claffey "t: _ confirmed Staff's position that the originally proposed driveway to the east of the proposed primary envelope would be very impactive to the wetlands and should not be allowed. �. _ Wildiife - Staff contacted Kevin Wright by phone, in an attempt to y' � fuxther clarify the Division of Wildlife's concerns with respect to this development. Mr. Wright indicated to Staff that, given the • absence of any other env3ronmental hazards, the DOW would prefer . ,° ' � the lower huildinq enve2ope over the upper envelope. This gosition is �based on the relative distance of the envelopes from the more ,�: critical wildlife habitat areas to the north. Kevin did indicate t'. ( that there was minimal difference between the two envelopes from �;. j a wildlife perspective and that, given the location of the wetlands '�S_ � and the potential debris flow hazard to the accessory enveloge, he -,. � -: � could support the proposed upper envelope for development. ` ��'- � I � _.. .....___-_.__._-___ _ ___�.. , . .... .. _ .. .,. .._ ___._ . _ , .�.,.::.� r,. �-->.. .._.;:.. . . . ,::-. .:,��,-. �.., .._. . �•, ��} � �i�� • a •, —. _ �`.�,. . �� * . �' • .1, � 1 . . .. ' . ' _ . -i', . ' . - . • . , . . . I. . . . . r �: � f. .. -,.._ . . . • . .s.t . ._"'�'^`Fttr . ' � . ' ' � . 'ryA .. , ,��iii'�"t��.� �'�C��:'^i.�j i":�Ml �'� � . ., .�{'i�.tii�. ..MwMlilOw.'��TaR"JL�AIIW�G F��•y;�e+r A'^ -J�,r . ��.!!^�,'��;F�... /.. ...'��?_, . . .. ' . ; ' �:,��,+� • � SIIlIMARY: The additional. information received from the Army Corp of i�<.:., Enqineers and Wright Water Engineezs has cbnvinced Staff that the #'" "�� ^ F:.:, •i; lower bufldinq envelope is not a suitable location for a residence. � ��;.�;� The potential for catastrophic debris flow events in this area of +,�' �� lower Coal Czeek, alonq with the accessory bni3ding envelope�s �' ' relative location to jurisdictional wetlands, make the upper < " r building site a better alternative for a residential building site ` 'i on this property, Mr. claffey�s positiva comments with reapect to �4�s �`' a bridge-crossing of the wetlands also serves to support the �,'?-::- utilization of the upper building envelope for the residence. Mr. '� " Claffey did feel that allowing a barn in the accessory envelope ��` would be acceptable, provided that this structure is not used for "�Yf ' human occupancy (residential dwelling unitj. nj�:;� = RECOi�II�IBNDATION: The Planning and Zoninq Commission and Staff are ` ' recommending approval with the conditions in the attached °-i resolution. � : ATTA�$N'P9: . ' ,:;�:., . �'` 1. Tom Newland supplemental memo 2. Paul Avant letter , 3. Army Corp,letter w/map y - 4. October 25 Staff inemo w/attachments mamo�fuaenateil.9 29th `� � I , �- ' � ' . :.� . . . . .� ., .. � . . � -� , . � - i ... . � . � . ... - . . . �. . - . . . . � . . .��. r' � . .. � . � . . . - . � � �,s . .. - . . . . � . . . . .. . . . .:7�.. . - . - .. . . . _ . t . . _ . . . . ... �. . � . � � �� ' . . . ' . . �., .. . . --. .. ._ . �J +'y.•: � � . . � . � . . . . . �� '.�: .. - .. . ,� . �. . .. � ��1 . . � . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . �.1�,. E�.�. � �� f � � . . � � � . . . . � � � � . . kl .i , .-��` � � - . . �. . � . � . . � . . � . . .. . � �- � � ._�"•. /. �..: . . � � ,`.. 3j 1 . ^ � � _.T 4��^ s ' t ��ir� _ t � �` � � "r -, '_� �J \ � � �; �� !, ` * , s ,—. � �� '� .-�{ _..} __ t. _ . � .' �.I .� z:,r'f-� . ; �.� � _ i � ..z , ��.. 'Y;i'�'��, a `v— rf _ !� • " . � � +�-.s•.: . ' - . . ' " � . � . u_ � _ . .;; � . , , ��' •'r:�:�1�At.'.''��4T:'s)s�� • . �.,�: .. _. . _ .. . :. -.�u LC..•..AfGe^ta�R:yi.')mh:.+a�.+st..:::._!..cr..,�.,:...f.:,��zo-ixrr.c,�.. ��•,� . ....,... -� ro . , ' . . f C�i Sr' - { f � G�� s `s; AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ��< � ' ry �j • • . �rc -: ,. � : �,. : � �I. � TO: Pitttin County Boazd of Commissioners . 6`' z,; e :: .[i•,�-,� ::�. THRU: Cindy Houben,Community Development Director(/)y��. �' ' ' s ;i.": i; FROM: Brian McNellis, Planning O�ce � s� ' :�� < RE: Auerbacher 1041 Hazard Review General Submission and Caretaker t-ry;i+;:='. : : Dwelling Unit �'�'' ". _; i'4; . ' . :�:�.' . � SUIVIMARY: The Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 29, 1995. '� `• Both the Planning and Zoning Commission and Staff recommend appmval of this :� �` ' ' applicauon subject[o the conditions outlined in the attached draft resolution of approval. � � REQUEST: The applicant is proposing 1041 Hazard review for the development of a. � single family home and an attached caretaker dwelling unit. T'he site is a 2.5 acre metes �' _ and bounds parcel within the RS-30 zone district. APPLICANT: Glen Auerbacher � `�� APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:Dennis Green LOCATION: The site is located on West Sopris Creek Road,more fully described as Lot 11 of the Nystrom Trac[s. � ISSUES: The site is divided by a ditch which def nes the upper and lower portion of the �`�' lot. In general,all of the hazazds are contained in the area above the ditch and the � .i development is proposed beiow.The hazard include low wildfire,potential snow � *� ' avalanche,and critical wildlife habitats. The applicant requests approval of a dog on the � � + site but proximity of the building site to mapped critical deer and elk habitat requires t}ae ' prohibition of dogs pursuant to Section 3-80.80 of the Land Use Coda If the mapping is �I incorrect,the applicant should work with the Division of Wildlife to propose a map � , �- � amendment.. , � RECOIVIIVIENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission and Staff recommend approval of the Auerbacher 1041 Hazard Review General Submission and Cazetaker Dwelling Unit pursuan[to the condidons outlined in the attached resolution. �� M. n . , �: � �� '�! . ;',: . :,_ '.k': i � ��.. . . � � .,—_...,,,,,r„u .,.......,,,�-.,';,..w.,.�.-.W .. ..� �.;.: ..... . , ., -- . ; i .. /' . _ . �. �!�.+ � �. . . � \ . .. ��- � . � . J i ,� � y �,: � � j' `' ^ . . . - , .. . . } ,: . ,,.. , • , - � y , I �; ' , �S ff�-''.� ' • . '.�2. .. �t�,�J.. `{.�(� /� ' .. � • 7' 11A S � * ��?, + �y lAI ��MI�`t��LT�OW?Yk..)�y4•.'.g';,'�1{'!','t� 4'f.. :�..;: . 1��1.. ' ,.�r'Y•`�";+`�6 �� ''� ` � � �'�1 °�[ � �'2'#'9�C- ` 'ra�'l�A��s�''��ii+�� 'y �.�i:• .�i. . .a'�a..: " r', i . �.�. �� . . . �� `°` �,�'. � � � .'Y�::.' � �ia��s �;�` ;',i :�;�� .; MEMORANDUM ' - Y:� , �i.� Y.'�� ' ? To: Board of County Commissioners i,, � Regular Meeting - December 6, 1995 • � ,i '� l .},. ;4 THRU: Cindy Houben, Community Development DirectorC� � ,� ;` RE: Cote 1041 Hazard Review and General Submission '� - - -_ • - �:�-,:. FROM: Rick Magill, Planner , <.-`'';''" '� ` . , � . 1p,•��:y. ....i.. . _______________—_______—__________—_—_____________________—_ L�j.�� '��___�`_��_�_� .. ... �:.F.�:.�'.''. REQIIEST: The Applicant is requesting approvaT of 1041 Hazard "`'�' �+;t�.. Review and General Submission for expansion of the building ,Y� envelope to accommodate construction of a greenhouse, tennis court, -iF' and carport adjacent to an existing single-family residence. The ��''` " . �'; Applicant also wishes to establish an accessory building envelope �"? ! for the construction of a barn in a pasture area below the main �'�°. residence. � ' ', � .:n: The property contains areas mapped. for wildfire (low to medium �' hazard), geologic (slopes in excess of 3o percent on the property) �2 . and wildlife hazards (deer winter range and an elk migration i corridor in the eastern portion .of the property). � APPLICANT: Bo Cote � , l;�� '�. SIZE/LOCATION: The project site contains approximately 42 acres i ; � and is located across East SopTis Creek Road from the Little Elk � _; - Creek Subd4vision. • ' ? � ZoNING: RS-30, thirty acre minimum lot size ;'� '�j. ; ACCESS: The existing access driveway will be utilized for this �i� �:� proposal. - --�!" BACR�ROUND: The subject property was first granted 1041 Hazard i4 �`• Review approval in 1986 (Resolution No.86-32, attached). A'single- family residence and a qarage were subsequently built in the area known as the approved building envelope. Upon the Applicant's y - submittal of a building permit for a minor addition to the home in December 1994, it was discovered that the home had been built � �' , � outside of the recorded building envelope. The Applicant - ! ; � represented that the building envelope had been erroneously - depicted on the 1041 Site Plan in 1986. Staff review of a Minor '�� Amendment to a Development Permit (attached) allowed the revision �•�; which shifted the envelope's .location to encompass the existing �`q residence and garage. The Applicant has recently constructed the �J minor addition to the residence, within the newly approved building ' :; envelope. � . ;'� �`' ! • � . y�� , �; i ti �i_. ._..--- — � . . - .�.._.. .,,.. ..__.--r��,,.�is:o:.A:.r.::�wY::� .xw+h..U'i..:.c . ..�..—�—�-------�—�.,�,u � � .�i.,`l� �� . �" u�R4`2'� . . - - ' . � � � � ��'� 4�: 1 6. "—� . .. . .. . � . . . �I,+, f . t . . . . . . ` . . ��.�Y�. �i . ._'' . . � . .� ' , . • �. . .. - .. " � - ..'j��.•.)�_. . . w... �. i _ '.� ; .:, . , . �. . ,. . . � �• _ ' , • .�� . : �' � � . '�(tiftJ "a.,+�e1`�rr.;i:55N_3?.1:'.. c ...... •� �ra. � ...,. .- � '.,. . • - a.ul�l.:..�s4s �,..^� ._..«...... •• . '6cU.. `3IR¢�aPna�e�r...a:w�.a�.wr�ax .. ' �b �.�'��'�R. 1 . �� .,`� . ..�_` � �'ti^: 3ITE/PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The property is primarily composed of .;.++:. ..�!� south-facing slopes, comprised oP pinon pine/juniper woodlands on j� l-.': the upper portion of the property, with irrigated pastureland and rt�',r,� :�, areas of sage generally comprising the lower portion of the parcel. ;;;; �;� , �1 There are several ponds in the lower portion of the property. An �`.,`;;-., • . �v expansion of the upper building enveiope of approximately 2/3 of ''' ,:y , j� an acre is proposed to accommodate the greenhouse, tennis court and c :,_,':' carport. The approved buildinq•envelope is approximately 1/3 of an ` '��, acre in size. The proposed lower accessory building envelope f � 4: appears to be approximately 1.2 acres in size. The expanded area ^ � �� ' of the upper envelope contains slopes of 5 to 25 percent. The lower `�:�'=. ` _ --..: � , ;� accessory envelope contains slopes of 12 to 25 percent. ''.:F:;�.,��' , +... REFERRAL AGENCIES: Referral agency comments are incorporated •:-- 5'c. throughout this memorandum and are attached for reference as ,;;`.':' necessary. . K... . � . � ;:.,q'. �� 1. County Attorney 2. Zoning offiee �� 3. Environmental Health Department , 4. County Engineer +: . • � 5. Colorado State Forest Service '� 6. Basalt Fire Protection District 7. Sheziffs. Office ' � . + 8. Division of Wildlife � {� STAFF COMMENTS: , 1041 AEVIEA � Wildfire - Kelly Roqers indicated that the upper building site •!�'' contains medium hazard fuels. Vegetation in this area primarily . consists of pinon and juniper trees, with an understory of sparse grass. Mr. Rogers points out that the wildfire hazard on this site will be mitigated substantially by the close proximity of this proposal to the existinq development, particularly the irrigated lawn beiow the house. The building site for the barn is located in �� an area of low wildfire hazard. The proposed accessory envelope lies entirely within an area that is currently a grass and low � '�:._�'. sagebrush meadow. The envelope is directly above an irrigated , , pasture. The recommendations of the �State Forest Service will be ! included as conditions of approval for this project. Geologic - The proposed expansion of the primary building envelope , �' , � includes slopes of 5 to 25 percent. The area of lesser slopes below ( • the residence is currently maintained as an irrigated lawn. , •' , . - There are Iimited areas adjacent to the existing building envelope ! ` with slopes less than 15 percent,� located mainly in the lawn area �' in front and to the west of the house. The Applicant has proposed ' to build the greenhouse and tennis court directly to the west of ' the house in order to maintain the open lawn area for recreational -4' � :.u�..; .;+ 2 •` - . '. � � � � r i,.,. . �i � . . , - � [� i(, 1 J � i .. ��`,.... . { ._ ---___—�,,, . ... .. � - . . ,.:� . . '•��-��,��:;....,�..�..._._..,.,.,.:r..aa,......_�«.,>...a.��'.::i�..m.:.ci.:y..----�.-.,,�------------------"-..,.,,.y,;� �s . . . / � � . - � .� �� - � ..- '�. . �f . � .. � � � � . . . . � . �.�.� � r� � � i �� f ~ ' <.;. 1 •,' . , • :� .. .. � - - - - - - :'� ._ _ ' � . ._. . . , �: . - ,�.�� . ,�, . �� ___ _ --- 1 _ __ -- , ��..__ . �.__..a_��_,..��.W:..<. ��i ,...:.�Saw�kaiba�a�'re._ r.LLiSr„.a f r�. �� T..,�u ._ _.< i+�fal�`�Wfdr�Atiit!usdliur y`"u vl'�y� "' V �Ji,fl+a�¢[Xt��f i�wy;i f, 'P.j;' • . .F,, ax. �r :;i : �r . > ; '�; uses and to preserve the expansive views. This would require that '_,� ��:�'� development occur in slopes of 5 to 25 percent. , . %#i3 •: -� The Land Use Code prohibits development on slopes in excess of 15 �r"-•;,'�� , percent, unless a specific development proposal is found to result ;.�,�>��•'- � in a site design that creates Iess impact than if the deveZopment '�'Z,� u was limited exclusively to slopes less than 15 percent. In th� i=� °:--' �x - v event that a development proposal utilizes slopes in excess of 1� i;'�-';?> ' = ,. � percent or if a development site is comprised exclusively of slope� ; ' ; ;� ° which exceed 15 percent, design and development shall be based o� 6 � o � _ 'J a detailed site analysis to identify the best development area. � �'-� The April 1995 geologic report prepared by Nick Lampiris indicate� ��a : that, provided all previous recommendations of his 1986 report are � followed, there are no additional geologic concerns with respec� s�'. ;:. ' to the areas proposed for development. , A.R. Staff recommended to the P&Z that the proposed primary buiiding i�r�' envelope be revised to exclude all areas with slopes in excess of `�"'�1 15 percent. This revision will not allow enough area to build a �-" ' tennis court and greenhouse, althouqh a small greenhouse may be � , L possible. Staff also recommended that the accessory envelope be +�;:-of , �' revised to exclude all areas with slopes in excess of 15 percent. �' Staff feels that this will allow ample area to build a barn, while ; minimizing impacts to slopes. " _- i � The Planning and 2oning Commission disagreed with Staff's I recommendation that all areas with slopes greater than 15 percent be eliminated from the primary envelope, based on the €ollowinq findings: _ ;�-,t � 1. The Applicant's proposal represents a reasonable use of '�' _ the property, given the character of the existing area and the surrounding land uses. - 2. The P&Z felt that allowing some expansion of the primary -��, building envelope to acommodate the proposed tennis court and greenhouse represents an acceptable balance between a minor encroachment in slopes in excess of 15 percent _'� (less than 26 percent) and the resultant visual impacts ,� : that may be � assdciated with development in other locations on the property. i, � 3. The P&2 felt that an increase in the primary envelope ' • � size is an acceptable request given the 1041 hazards in % this area and the size o£ the parcel (42 acres) . ' r' • � Wildlife- The subject property is within mule deer winter zange and contains an important elk migration corridor on the easteYn portion of the parcel. Randy Cote is comfortable with the c�inditions of 1�, Resolution 86-32, with respect to the migratory corridor to the , east oE the development. Randy points out that the Applicant is ��.; ��;.. :�, :�:•: ,r` 3 1._ ' �. . �, . .. . . � ��r�i�.:.::�; ��t . ,f.,_,J..,.. ----w.w,n;�,.�-.� •z:r..a..w�-W •�,..,;t::ru.i��t..:rj.. c..:.�.� -'.ut:u""""""__ ,.___"°`• ��f�r . � . ` ' .. . � ' �� 5� .''_. . � . . . . .. .' . . . . -�E,. . '. . � � � ��f� - . . M1 , �. ` � �. _ . ' ..-.�./ Y . . . . ' . . ': - , '. '.'• ... '� .-1 . . �.._..��... . .. ..' ' . . . . �.... .�' �.i . . ..� � ' � � . � .. .. - . l �• .. .. " . . • . ..•.�• .. . .. .. � 1 ..:�, ..� . . . � . . ._.. 1 . . . .. . ,�. . . .. . . . - " " �_ .' ._ '' ,'� : -� � � � . . . ' � . .. � � . . �i � . . .• . . ' . . .. - . . . _ . - .. , . ' a ,�x,,,�;e - � � ,�. • b�� , r. , . t�iAr��. e � - � / � . .i'�"1i�1.__c'A8-°3xc.' . ..... � t-.. ..... . _. - .,crlC:,..sncs��rr,s:.:1Aen*�e6:.zma.s..,.�.,.s.�rr:a.nw....�. �... .� E ?S:I;r • t,,. ,,:1;,j;�vi' � �.� �� .. '. �.�a�: ��,� S. not in compliance with the fencing specifications required in the � .��' initial application. The fence currently is a 5-wire fence and does -l� ��'. �.,, not comply with the standard DOW guidelir�es. Staff recommends a .}:,;; -�; that the Applicant bring the fence up to DOW standards, prior to r%-:�...w� , z the issuance of a building permit. In addition, Randy now states • !:• - � that aZthou h do s were , '�� " , g g prohibited in the initial 1041 review� j;''' :,,�i r, s ^kenneling could be effective if used". In recent cohversations r�`::;.;':" j with Randy Cote revealed that he originally recommended that dogs �";"; be kenneled and that the 1986 1041 review process resulted in the '>..:%3:,'.:;,,.' �; prohibition of dogs. Staff could not find a 1986 memorandum from � � a. Mr. Cote on this issue, yet the 1986 Staff inemo indicates that the ' ..._. . condition to prohibit dogs originated with the DOW (see attached .r. .,.. � memoj. Staff does not fee2 compelled at this time to recommend that (� do s be ermitted on the "':'"`�� '` y p property, although „the Code allows ;,_;>;;.,,, , kenneling of dogs within 1/4 mile of an elk migration corridor. GENERAL SUBMISSTON �,'�. �.' , r -: Drainaqe and Erosion- Development within the building envelopes �Y� will pose little potential for erosion provided that all areas - , - disturbed by construction are revegetated within the first growing .�: . " season following the completion of the development. ;:Y � r Impacts to Roads - The addition of a greenhouse, tennis court, 1 carport and barn to the existing sing'le-family development will not . cause significant additional impacts to the County roads. Scenic Quality - The existing clevelopment, although visible from portions of the Snowmass/Capitol Creek Valley, is exemplary in it's design and use of exterior finish materials. The atilization of low profile construction and natural coloring serve to allow the �;b;;ye residence and garage to recede into the hillside in a very �? ' . e£fective fashion. The proposed location of the greenhouse and tennis court will only be visible to the distant upper portions of the Capitol Creek Valley, due to the surrounding topography and , vegetation. Staff would not support additional development in the lawn area in front of the home, as this location would be much more �° visually impactive. The carport is proposed in the location of an � existing parking area east of the garage. This structure will be ; '; � � visible from the valley below. Staff will recommend that the -- ---� Applicant utilize design and construction techniques for the - qreenhouse and carport which are similar to those used on the „ residence and garage. The proposed location for the barn will be vlsible from East Sopris Creek Road and the valley below. Staff 'i, . . , feels that a barn in this location is consistent with the agricultural character of the area, provided the architectural style of the barn is typical of agricultural outbuildings in the . '� iregion.. . The P&Z recommends that lighting of the tennis court be prohibited ( based on the potential for significant visual impacts. tt` . � W""�� yi`-: j 4 ,. �4.�., i i . . � I �;.1'. . ... rar.+'c�.k"o�Ya,swa:L'i�'+Y.+:.+.- �'_ . ,..� sl.a:.M�F.�<r-w:�.i�ira..�+�.—�-- •----rw-c..� �Y / . . � . . . . , . . �� ' Y. �'a . .. . . . . . . . �. . . � . . -_ " - - .. � _ . t . � . . ` � �i�.\ J ' ,.♦ � , , �.,,., .j { ` . �, i . _ _� . � . - -. -- - -- `-- �.:i._., . � . . � � � • . � . � . � . f '. . �: , . � . . .. ... , . .. -_ . _ . . ' . �4�w .. . . ' � . . . � . � . .:{�'i'T'' . • ' ' . . � . . ;y�F .�� _ - _..�...� __ �__.. ---- mm.� �._........ ' � ��d. �,...�t'9's�.Y..�.�� 'k,.1rZ(N:.r. � . :'S�. . � . �' 0 1 r. 8a�"+��,�� y r r, � . a �w• ,.s ,P's B€i:`. ar.: :.=:+r�e�..��Ysi��x�`'�5�'��i��4fk'�S'�' "�'`�''�,"v�'iyt'sr, 4��cli.• , -.y'.:. � I �✓ i �u - �i: � �, t��1 Water and sewer - The Environmental Health Department will '= � require the Applicant to document that the available water supply �";_,�� ;� is of sufficient quality and quantity •for the expanded use �' '' �+, :� (greenhousej, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The EHD �:';-,:3 �3 points out that the existing septic system is not sized to '>� �:y,s � accommodate any additional bedrooms. Under the recently revised � t':.,.. � zegulations, the system is undersized for the existing 4 bedroofi ��:- house. Should additional bedrooms and/or bathrooms be considered `• s � in the future, the Applicant will be required to obtain a septiu �.y.. - �� permit for expansion of the septic system: �s;�;?:. �xY ,,.. � Utility Extensions - All utility extensions shall occur within th� building envelopes or buried within the access driveway. ? h�L�. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Count� I Commissioners approve the Cote General Submission and 1041 Hazar � . Review subject to the following conditions: ! � 1. The Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Resolutioh � � No. 86-32 and the conditions of the December 1994 Minor - i Amendment to a Development Permit, unless otherwise revised �-"- � or amended by the conditions of this document. '� 2. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations t`� made in the application and in the current and past public ` meetings. . 3. Prior to building permit application, the Applicant shall � record a 24 x 36 inch mylar 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan which - meets the approval of the Planning office and County Attorney. �� '• The site plan shall include the following 1041 Hazard Review Warning and Disclaimer: "The provisions of these regulations do not in any way assure or imply that areas outside of designated hazard areas will be free from hazards, or that ' approved mitigation measures will guarantee the + : i safety of any property.�� ' � i ; �?� a. The building envelopes shall be revised according � �., to P2anning and Zoning Commission recommendations ! (see attached Exhibit B) , a� i � � - A. Liqhting of the tennis court shall be prohibited. All outside ' ; illumination shall comply with County lighting standards iri effect at the time of bui2ding permit issuance. _•' .,,�. ; i S. The area around the structure shall incorporate landscaping ' with wildfire defensible space considerations as follows: NOTE: Actual vegetation manipulation to meet these conditions may not be necessary where the natural .��„ . i. � . � 5 1' ._. . � . � 1 i'- .�'.�.. . y".� ' : / "�'�+�i-.u's...ccs.,�xu:�....r.y.----- - �-'*�x..-::;�o.'v�.i.w@..'?./wai Z+'..r'..:a...sW�:.:.h..«.. --.._ ....----•...,m„ � . . � . . . . � . . , . . " ". . . ' .• _ . 1 . . '.:. � . .� ' � . � . . � � .I. j� �� 4 �, �. � _ �, _ � ,,> �: . ,,t . I , } 1 / :� _ _ __ _ ;� ' �: . - • ' ' , ' `� r' . y�. - �� . v �n: . �� . '+r�Y�r+.iilk'I['�,?Y.':: t-Y�'.. ' .. ?4.. �.,, . .. .. _. � � � a.i:r.+�-..r�r.•+�nsa:x:e��+csKrxww........w,t.,.,.,.,�.+...,..`�. .�,.{,�7� • «.i h'.�I%. ; }.. � � .. 4.. '..-; vegetation patterns have already fulfilled these � ;�y„1 conditions. �'° ;d '�`-. y: ' ' :`-,., yy a. Brush, debris, and non-ornamental vegetation shall M ,� __� be removed within a minimum l0 foot perimeter around , ;� the structure. f � .��,� b. Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the vertical and horizontal continuity of the fuels a minimum of '� +: a 30 foot perimeter around a structure bui2t on flat !� - ground. (For greater slopes ref. CSFS Safety Zone. � - chart. Page 13, Wildfire Guidelines For Rura2 �,� :� Homaowners). _ c. Spacinq between clumps of brush and vegetation within the 30 foot perimeters shall be a minimum og • � Y ,. two times the height of the fuel. Maximum diameter �' , of the clumps shall be two times the height of the Euel. All measurements shall be £rom the edges of � the crowns of the fuel. ' i'. �;, i � d. All branches from trees and brush within the 30 foot perimeter shall be pruned to a height of 10 feet above the ground and removal of ladder fuels from + around trees and brush. • � � e. Tree crown separation within the 30 foot perimeters sha11 have a min'imum of 1Q feet between the edges � of the crowns. This does not apply to mature stands of Aspen trees where the above reaommendation £ar _ i removal of ladder fuels have been complied with. Tn areas of aspen regeneration, the spacinq •� guidelines shall be followed_ f. All branches which extend over the roof eaves shall � � be trimmed and all branches within 15 feet of the y `! chimneys shall be removed. � -.� g. The density of fuels within a 100 foot perimeter of � '. the structures shall be reduced where natural 1' -;--� reduction has not already-occurred. � � h. All deadfall within the 100 foot perimeter shall be i removed. '; � - � i. The applicant shall be responsible for the continued maintenance of the defensible space vegetation � ,j requirements. . � � 6. Prior to issuance of a building�permit, the Applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate domestic water supply. �' Quantity and quality of said supply shall meet the approval I` _,�,. . 6 �� ;�,: >s: � � - ' i?: , . � �� ': . . � - ""'-�-�-�r.�::s.m:.w,.�ua'u�,c...-1 """�'•w„��,'�vz�ea�+a�u:�'s�..� ,�..;e.;.:..�u..-...�-......•-,--.__ ..._„__,�„��y 4t ? i'. � .. . ,4�� if".�i . . . . . . -. . .. . . i . L 4.� -. �� . . . . . . . . - � _. . . . � � � � � . '� . . _ - . ��' . . � �. - , �- .. .- ,.. . . , .� . .. S .� �. . ��. .. . :. . :. . ; � . . :. ,.�. .. .. . .... . :. . � . . .. . .. . �... .. �.. ., _. � . ,. ; ��:. •`� r.:: � . 1 1 �.i". . . . _ . . � .. ��. � � � � . .. . � . . . . . .. ..,. . . . . .. . . � ... . i , �;- ' ' ' . . . . . . . . . � . . . .... ;_.— _ �--.'` .– '-- .. ��...C �..y_ . - . . • .�. l �; ' . .. . . . - ' . . ... . - . . _ . ' _ , _ . . '� .... . .� . .. . �. - - ,�'.��' .. . ' ' _ ' . . . '... . � . .. _ ` i�� - ,_._ _°_ _°_. i :.,�„ . .iS... _ .r�b- . �..+.�.^.-�>.a�ns:. . e�:. .. ,., . _ . � . ...,.. .__. ....._.. __. ._ „ . . . . . .. _. ..__.._� r . . . f+�.{T��_�-".fi;, ' t,.' } r �. , t,g 't � of the Environmental Health Department. - ,.;;,+� :`�1�� l'. �-.}. .'; c; 7. The Applicant shall obtain a septic permit from" the EHD, �t y ' should any bedrooms and/or bathrooms be adde3 in the .future~ � .y;� s; . , i i , ~ ��'��-�•'"� 8. The Applicant shall obtain a fireplace/wqodstove permit from . z.�; � Environmental Health Department, prior to the issuance of a �?; � building permit. • � ;.. � �' ; .r � 9. The disturbed areas within the building sites shall be ,- _;_... - revegetated with native grasses to limit water consumption and ,.�::.w':_.` additional runo£f, immediately following project completion. . .r. -:: �.. . 1D. The Applicant shall adhere to the standards of Section 3- ;x ;`. 805(C) as fo2lows: ,-�;,'�'" . :�.� a. Adequate mechanical support shali be provided for cut ��!,q':; slopes. ` ' "'�#. b. Adding water which may decrease slope stab'ility shall be � avoided. c. Adding weight to the top of the slope shall be avoided. d. Disturbed slopes must be contoured so that they can be i`� - revegetated. - e. Steepening of existing slopes sha1Z be avoided. f. Confine cuts, £ills, grading, and excavation to the minimura area needed for construction. ' !'�`' il. Prior to the issuance of a building permit,the Applicant shall comply with the following DOW fencing standards for all new � and existing fences: Fencing shall be a maximum height of 42", 4 strands or less � with a 12" kickspace between the top 2 strands. Any rail � • � i fencing shall be the round type, 48", 3-rail or less with at j � �. . + least 18" between 2 of the rails. - - ,,.� . " ATTACHMENTS: ' 1. . DOW comments . , 2. CSFS comments _ � . 3. Environmental Aealth Dept. comments 4. Zoning Office comments . - • 5. Lampiris report . • 6.� Resolution #86-32 � ' _ ' 7. 1994 Minor Amendment melao 8. 1986 Staff inemo � : memo_cote_1041_pz. ' � � �:: r� � . +` ' � . . . . � . -ii .�`: . �i� , _._.._ ... _ .....M.._..._..� .... . .- .. .>:a:�&�.w,.�e..:;.., ..,, . , _„�,s: °°�.....::�r. _ , . � 1 _ � � .- � � .�.-. � ...: . <:<... 1.s..�-.--'__"."'� . -.+o�.�....s�r.r��.n;s+wp+1.�+.to.a• . .,� .�� w f 1 y �� F . ` /� - � .�'�' �: . -. . .. � �,^`? � ,`. '.�. .. `. �i " �c 1 . _ _,.�, .i,' - , - . . ..,,...e. . . . . � I 't r �, .. I ' � � . . . . .,.i �� . :� .;.; . _ � �. . - � � . .�:� .. . . _ . v: .` _ '. . . ,. ' . .�I � . � .... . .. , :�'�t"^'E " : �•Jq . • . . � . .� �' � __._.� �f . — ; ; ' , , ,.. ., ,._. . _ , _ . --�-- -- �prt�"` � ' - ' � , . ...._.... ._ ._..._.._._..�....."'_' �F`� � �l0U STATE OF COLORADO REFER TO f Roy Romer,Govemor °. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GQ��O� DIVISION OF WILDLIFE ' ' '� F' ° � ;'' � . . . AN EOUAL OPPORNNITV EMPLOYER �I i� '�'`... � Perry D.Olson,Oirxtor �w�7 �d'�. • yQy �.�'� �. e0so eroedway ' �4•OF`� r,,ti, Denvar,Colorado 80218 .. _ � Telephone:(303)297-1192 � � 7'", �. - ForWildlije— t� - - - • � ForPpople s�Z',;, Community Development i: Rick Magill �` L':� 130 S.Galena • ' Aspen, CO 81611 --- - RE: So Cote 1041 � a � The DoW does not have any specific concern with the F � ' submitted application. The migratory corridor is East of the improvements and the initial application covered our concerns. " It should be noted that the existing fencing on the property .Q.� was hever built to specifications that were required on the original application. The request for dogs was initially denied; . however, kennelling could be effective iP used. Thank you, �� G Randy Cote (no relation) , Colorado Division of Wildlife. � a • � � : ' � � � �- ' . � � r:j � __ � , ..l � - . . . .. . . . . 15 .I . . ._ .. . ' . ' . . . � . ' � ' . � I �.�� . � . . . . . . � � 1. 1 . . - . . . . � : . . � � . 1: ' . . . . , . � ' . . � . . . . . `t.. . - � . . . . � . . - � . . , . � . . . . . � • � . . . � � . . - . . . �'k• �. ... �'. . � . . � : DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL flESOURCES,Kennelh Salazar,Executive Direcror � �; � WILDUFE COMMISSION,Will�am R.Hegberg.Membar• Eldon W.Cooper,Membe� • Felix CAavez,Member• Re6ecca L.Frank.Membe � ` � L o u i s F.S w i F t,S e c re t a ry • G e o r g e V a n D e n B e r g,C h airman - Arnold Salazar.Member •Thomas M.Eve,Vice Chairman � � . _ , . . . 4',i • c _ •-.,�.�.` y-y .�i„t��ia.�y�,ba��; 4. .,y�� F� S Y'.' 0."ts�W..%..`-...�.�..**.,...... t r� :ta{ i �` ;: � �=:� .. F Y ` J i�.\ � . , `1��. � . S- . .` ` `F .�' :.� � . . . " _ ,��.!_ . ' !, .. - ... : , � . .. ,..,,:. . ' i - .. ' . : ` . '. ' . ..._:. . .._ � .. �: . . � . - � . ', .i . ... .. �... , �i'+ ` � . . ' . . -�. .� � . �:� ., .:. .�.'.� ... ,�. . _ . � . .., . � ?�k . - � � . � � .. . . ._. � .. .. , . . `�„ : . - � . ' .�� ._ _J_......_r_�.______ r .rii'.n.� . ' _ k"�DI."„�$�:._.... . ,. .. �.. � . . ' e � .. ._...... . ._._.._.�_._. . ... . � . ��L�i �� _} .o�,�ts .�:� �� AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY �'�� '�� !`-.;: - :'.r� TO: Board of County Commissioners .;�;,.�� Regular Meedng-December 6,1995 ��::., , _� � '�,s THI2U: Cindy I3ouben,Communiry.Development Director�/Yw� �;=.":'�'. � ' -_ .5�,.. FROM: Francis X.Krizmanich, " -_�:b:: RE: Second Reading of an Ordinance to rezone the Aspen Highlands Ski Area '•.Y'R�� from AFR-10 to AF-SKI �;'`';�: � -i�;r:i;.`. ISSIJE: On April 12,1995,the$oazd heazd the First Reading of an Ordinance to rezone a_ ' the Aspen Highlands Ski Area from AFR 10 to AF-SHI. The Second Reading and Public Hearing for the proposed rezoning has been continued from 7une 14,1995 to allow for � �` G • Planning Commission review of the u�c impact analysis that was required as part of i 4. .._ the lift upgrades approved pursuant to BOCC Resolution No.94-87. 6, P. The Planning Commission review on October 24 resulted in the following �� recommendations: 1. Further review should be required for any acdvity which increases traffic use. 2. The Highiands should continue to monitor kaffic impacts,with modifications to tite methodoiogy as recommended by the Counry's consultant,Kathleen Krager, � which include: * Traffic counts sfiould be reiated to a particulaz ski day to determine the � - � relationship between traffic and"high or low use"days. i i � \ � * A more detailed accoundng of skier drop-offs shouid be provided,in a!i_ . .� _-� particular,the number of skiers dropped off per vehicle should be counted. � . ' - � s 3. The County should work with the applicant to consider providing additionai"No � Pazking"signs along Maroon Creek Road. � . 4. The Planning Comtnission commends the applicant for daing a aood job � monitoring ri'afFc and addressing neighborhood concerns regazding tr�c ':+ � � . impacts. r� ,: The staff notes that the applicant committed to an expanded parking management f program this year that will include paid parking on all Holidays and every i' r, ..:�: Friday/Saturday/5unday. The Highlands also proposed to use a dedicated A.M.radio � ,;., channel to provide parking informa6on. !, �'' � # �•, ��- j+- � _ .......—,--,-,-�...y-a..�..v.<:ni.a:...,..�>-,-.-_.._. _.-_....,� +,.,..:�:;.��1..��.:.�s:<...:,...ws,s�...tus .. .o._ . - -----�-'-'�aSg�r . , s�;.��..,.�.K.�...�---- . ._..,w,y„e . ., ...._.�.-- � . �'�. ' � . . � �. . .. -�� .� .. - . . i' ..: .' , ' .. l� *...�. . . � �+. - . . . - . . �,� .. . � , .. ��`t �1 _ � r; - y1 _ J s . � 1 ' ::, . . , ; : , , .'. . _ ': �. • •: � , . _. � . ..,.:_ ._. ___ :i.,, . . _ _ �: ' � , ' . �'�"� f• . , a� �da-J�. ..:..t�F:.�!LiTit��.2a.: e 5::.,. �� . �n.. ...... � '�. . •� ;:�:c.kC.•.a�Na�'ac:.:tlsainsrr6w�raL � .�.. 1. ..a-..[!�_::�::iLY1:aiYaGd.V��1` r t6�J�� .�� r ,�i �/�. ��•��,�1e�1 �. �.� The staff supports the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the additional r'r,� . i; commitments made by the applicant to add paid patking on all Holidays and"weekends". :;-:'�� v ;� 4....� , . ` a�°�..�:y�r `� The staff does not support allowing additional lift upgrades or the improvement of on- ` ; mountain facilities beyond those approved by BQCC Resolution No.9487. The staff �'-� � opinion is that the data provided aff'irms our belief that improving the ski area will f:'..� `' �' r � increase udlization of the ski azea,which,in turn will increase pazking demands. It . .. � appears that the FIighlands Ski Area requires approximately 600 parking spaces at � present. T7te proposed"Base Village"plan shows 450 skier spaces which results in a r - de6cit of 150 spaces assuming no skier increases in the future. The staff opinion at this ' - time is that the County should not approve further ski area improvemenu until the Highlands provides an acceptable tr�c managemeni pIan to the County that includes � . both the ski area and Base Village. 'a ` � ,� Section 3-230 of the Code,"AF-SHI Master Plans and Major Amendments",states cha[ � an approved Master Plan is required for any development in the AF-SHI zone[o occur. The exisring AFR-10 zone requires special review for any activity to occur at the ski area. � The staff prefers that the Highlands be rezoned to AF-SKI[o reflect the true condiaon at Highlands;however,we cannot support approval of the Master Plan without agreement �a regarding the resolution of fucure trafFic impacts. Because the staff is not prepared to recommend approval of the Master Plan at ihis dme,there appear to be two alternadves available to the Board. They are: 1. The Board may approve the rezoning to AF-SHI as requested at this dme pending �� approvai of the Master Plan at a later date. � 2. The Board may decline to approve[he rezoning at chis flme and may continue the second reading to a future date after a traffic mitigation plan has been improved. The staff notes that the rezoning Ordinance states"NOW,Tf�REFORE,BE TT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners that it hereby approves ihe rezoning ��'ti � .� of the Aspen Highlands Ski A.rea from A�'R-i0 to AF-SKI subject to final approval of the ; - �-�—� proposed Master Plan". This language does not preclude fuRher applicadons from being ;i ; submitted prior to approval of the Master Plan. The staff opinion is that any further j� ! development of the ski azea shouid require an approved Master Pian. � ' The staff recommends that the Boazd consider amending the Ordinance to state that the i � rezoning shall become final at this dme and that addifional development is prohibited un[il such time as the County approves a traffic mi6gation plan as part of the Master Plan. ;.;: . ` �The proposed amendment would state"NOW, THEREFORE,BE Tf RESOLVED by the �� Board of County Commissioners that it hereby approves the rezoning of the Aspen �' Highlands Ski Area from AF12-10 to AF-SHI. BE 1T F(JRTf�R RESOLVED by the `•� u' : Boazd that no further development activiry shall be permitted until the County approves `� �'• :;-: the Ski Area Master Plan. The plan shall include a trafFc miti gation plan." � 'y��'= � 1, ;,.,. -----� — ----.-,.....:�,.3...._..,W:.�__,___ __ __ ... �.,�.N n_.u;..:�. ��,...::.�__------- - �i e � ' � ' ��- .. ;, ' • .+.;��;. - -" '� � ," . �; _ .l' ;_ .:�, ` � . • : . :�, . ; , - , -, __ . r �: � - _ . . .fi u. . .. . . � ♦ .. ��V ' " � . � . ' � � . � �y'fy. ' !�e .. ' i�, ..��,`�dfa'�'��':r::�a�.,�s-�', "a$:�'� :.a,.��a� :.._,,._ ' ' ',.�,r�s+�' ' '��'�,��'��i': J. 1 A...�. r�l � ' . �• �ti �k:� �I . .. . . . . � . . . � . � . . . . � .. . . . � � ��.. � � � . . � . . . . �� r . RECONIIVIENDATION: The staff and Planning Commission recommends approval of ,.,.; �i;�� `; the rezoning of the Aspen Highlands Ski Area from AFR-10 to AF-SKI as outlined in the fi,.;�' -. � attached Ordinance(as amended). . -` ` �,� � i�'�K „ (;, . . . . � . ' . . . �:� IF . � � . � . � �. .. . � - � . ' ;f�,s ' . . . � . .:L��v,. _ Attnchments: y ;�� r , 1: Rezoning Ordinanca . ;',��} , 2. Staff Memorandum to P&Z re: Traffic Impact Review,October 24,1995 3. Staff Memorandum to BOCC re: Highlands Rezoning,September 27,1995 i, Y . . . . . , � . ' . � . � �s:q., ��`. . . .. . ._ . : . � . -.��. . ... . . . . .. . �. .:r... ;..; :, � .. . .. . . .. . . . ..; . ..:a:. �,� , ... . .._,. . : � . , i � •�.4� _ �. � - •.'�X'TS � �; '�:, .; '.. :. , .. :. . � . � . . � � , �' \ t — �. . .' ._._ , . .�_ ...--... � � '� . � ., .�:- :. J �, �i �. _ t � '...�-: .�".' . , .,. -_ �. .�-. .. ..� ... Y: 1 i �Y� � i • `�. . , � .. . � :'.�'1; .�n� � �. . :if ��, - 1 �, i ;;i,. �::'.` ... ..�.. '� . . . .. . � . . ..��. ...: .. .. � �r,;�.� 4I 1: ! . . . . . - . . � � . .. . : ��; '\-' ��i '�-'� � : M5�s .„ '}"i :; f.r�,xxt ��S.�h�`�, � � �{`w.:�. - k�'� . ,t i �. r x . � .a :{��a � iL q,� � 3�� !"r''1:��j x�-i�/jN/y��H t 7 s !�\ $i�bYt��LS`{F � �'t �' F, �. * �, 1 �-1 4s�i,�,,h� �#t�'��.'tY'' C�' a � lk : �a � t h��'�uy x.N�'��wR 33r�'f t� �`..yt',�r• �� '�� k�f,a t J . � Y '� 1 ^�.r�c,� � �g�rr� ;� � . ��,a ut '�i r .�"-, .�' ,� � 'x `- �' ' ..' '- TC �'��1 .ifl1 0 4�, } -. ' - .. K�'�_ �_,,i� ti.-�1�' A � . . $ rx '�� r�.- ' . d � �� f t - �� 3 �y .i4'� _- ' ' . �� ty t � •4 I _ 1 _ . . t� _. ;: . _, ,': . ' : :� . . .. .. \ . v.,d'• . ' . . t� " ; __.�....� _ _ _ --- `��`. . . -- -- - � . _. .._...___._._.___.___.__...__..__. . � . ;N;,, �� , `:� � rP.�a `' .e��!6 ' p ; r�; ,: a�asoxaxuo�s ,_��.'� . � �: .:,. ;t'. . TO; Pitkin County Blanning and Zaning Commission `.=�:#�•.�-�� FROM: Francis Krizmanich, Deputy Director of .Zoning �,� � ,�.,: : . �:i r ^; RE: Aspen Highlands Ski Area AF-SICI Rezoning and Master Plan '.- � •• • - Review ��'-�`'� � y S :� i. DATE: November 25, 1994 �-"�-- ' �� -- ; % Y .� � �,}r,,�, '.. � REQOEST: The Aspen Skiing Company (ASC) has suhmitted an ``�s �.'. � application for AF-sRI Rezoning and Master Plan approval for the h Aspen High2ands Ski Area in accordance with Section 3-1.12 of the ;� � Pitkin County Land IIse Code. The intent af the AF-SKI zone }`�> a , district is to provide for "orderly and efficient planning and �` review of ski areas within Pitkin Ccunty." Development activity �.�, within the AF-SItI district is contingent upon the adoption of a �'. •• Master Pl.an; therefore, this Master Plan is being submitted in � ,.�.. compliance with the zone district requirements. �F;°.`�_ r The products of this review process should be: �� . ,� ' i. An approved Master Plan- consistinq of maps and accompanying text; and � 2. A listing of activities according to the criteria in the AF- SKI zone district, which include: "� y^1'.. �� a. Activities allowed all year. b. Activities allowed only during the winter season. c. Activities allowed by further review. d. Activities which are prohibited. f. i This memorandum will summarize the proposed Master P1an and review it based on the criteria ou�tlined in the AF-SKI zone distrfct, the County Growth Management policies, the State Hiqhway 82 Corridar � -. -_ Master Plan and the general policies of the Pitkin County Land Use , �! Code. `! ; The ASC is propasing the following improvements as uses by right : - i.n the Master Plan: � i. Remove the foZlowing existing lifts: � •' ; : � * Exhibition I * Cloud Nine * Loge Peak * Olympic * Exhibition II * Nugget ��-T,r * 6rand Prix Poma �,. ;f -,�, 1 � 't 1:'"I �� .,__.:;�:..._..�..�.....-.— - ---�,.�. �. ,..��.�--,— -�. --.-..,��._. -�c.»,:....,�..-u.�.c:. ,cw.,«.�.:�..�.:s✓.��..�- — —'-�.,,,�„t l� ,,�. � � _ . � � . • - a ��C� ,. ', _ `; tf ,` J I �1 _ ; _ '' , . � ; --- ._.__ _,_. _. . __ .- .:i _::; • f �: , . - __ w ;��crr .. . � � �� . . � � . . . ' ;��; , a .. __i.._., ----- �_ �:,� . � _ e .. �_. ' � `r. :.:S�a� r:G..•r.ti..�.. •�E:I.tS:,�;rtt�.'F:CiPd;B'ti7�`NiiicS.►iitk",dikew� �;,:+.i.�!;��.e+na��;', � .e,. .. , , . �: � ._ . . .,.. .. �. . ` . .. . "_ . .. __.. ... . _..... "'.. ...._..._�..'"_�..."'_" ':,..,,��' r . -"'.----' ',`.�rt `��? _�,/ �� I'.,; t' ��MR41 ��.. 2. Construct the following new lifts: '� � , . -�- * Exhibition I (high-speed quad, 1800 skiers/hr capacity) '�'�-�a "�i * Loge Peak (high speed quad, 12Q0 skiers/hr capacity) 5'' ,!i,, , � * Exhibition II (fiiced grip douhle chair, 1200 skiers/hr) 4 ,. ,, Cloud Nine Express (high-speed quad, 1800 skiers/hr ( �4��, � capacity) . {:t;;�.,:" ;,.. � 3. Install an underground utility corridor from the base ��' ', azea to the Merry-Go-Round restaurant to accommodate i;';�;:-^--?; --- updated qas, water, sewer,. electric, and telephane services. Continue the underground utility corridor from =�>;:-�;;`, the Merry-GO-Round restaurant to Loge Peak to accommodate ��`'"" - upqraded water, telephone and electric services. �:: '.;� 4. Widen the T-Lazy-7 catwalk from Prospector Gulch to the I top of the Nuqget lift and conduct selective thinning and '�1 glading bet�reen the following ski trails: •ti � * Between St. Moritz and Hoomerang `� * Bet�reen Golden Aorn and Park Avenue * Setween Apple Strudel and Moment-Of-Truth �� * Between T-Lazy-7 Catwalk and Exhibition ?i _ 5. Consolidate, relocate and upgrade the maintenance facilities currently located in the base and Merry-Go- Round areas into one facility northeast of the Merry- Go-Round area. Regrade and revegetate these areas. C� BPPLICANT: Aspen Skiing Company � - APPLSCANT'3 RBPRESENTATIVE: Glenn Horn, Davis Horn, Inc. and Brent Gardner Smith, Aspen Skiing Company. I+OCATZON: Aspen Highlands Ski Area. �' ZOlTING: AFR-10 - '� \ BACRGR.OIIND: ._- ---, ' Pitkin Countv- Qn April 19, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended � limited approval of the Aspen Skiing Company's (ASC) proposal. The r�,. � ; approval included replacement of the Exhibition I and Loge Peak � ' ` lifts, installation of a new utility corridor, increased glade skiing areas, replacement of the mid-mountain maintenance buil.ding , : ' and base area snowmaking pumphouse_ The Baard oE County Commissioners approved the SpeciaZ Review application for these actions on May 31, 1994. The Resolution No. 94-87 is attached as : •`^'� Appendix I of the application. No action was taken at either the ;,: ,}�',; Planninq Commission or Board hearings regarding the AF-SKI rezoning ' 4 = - ' , 1�. i . 2 �'.: k.l '`.�; „.:. -- --+�.+�..�....`�+...-...,..�..-...d.�..-•�— ....._�_,.� .. .... .- - � '_ ..........-�..�.....-.^- . m..+.�,�.--"^".�. i . • . .t.. ..t1ra�l..✓.�:...`FmG.,x•MV...i�eJM.�NY . . tV k . � . ` . . . � . . �'�_� h..� � ' � . � . - � . . . . � � . - . Y.;. . . . . .- , .. . . . , � :t � J � I l; j I,,� .� _ • _ . �. � _ _ . -. . t , . , E.. i _ ,{ � : ` � � - , . , K!,,�,�� . ' ' . ' N f�T . . .. .. . � ��"• �f ' • �� _ ___ � _�.,.,�,�.�,... __ ��r.��d. S� ��'�T3{"��'Ytit'�1�Tt;."-t Ji .�:.1. ��'- ./r:..'4� ._:O" �.�✓�S+�.F]7�t�sL,if�1�Wa.�..yS.`L`yidL'L'1c�J��.2�a�3S�r.� .. � .. _ ._-- - . .. . . . _ --._.... _ _ . . � ,,,, . • _'k•i �'1' r ' � 'i:4: ,F%; �r;•s ..-: t:,;��t ,ti or Master Plan approval. ��;�I��` . #�,- -'e. This application was reviewed hy the Planning and 2oning Commission �' ��;'�� • ' on June 21, 1994. The staff inemorandum included a number of :s+,',•' '��:rr ' recommended changes to the proposed Master Plan, Most of the ` ` ' changes discussed at that meeting have been incorporated into the �x,=:`"' revised lan. The staff comments later in the memorandum will �� ' [ P i$;> .,.: _• discuss issues that have not been resolved. !' ;�,:;. II.S. Forest Service Apvroval= �`..• :$;�~ The II.S.F.S. approved the proposed Master Plan on May fi, 1994. The �~=`' decision notice is included as Appendix 2 of the Master Plan. The ` '`��".' II.S.F.S. approval includes the following: 1. Raaova tlte follat+i.ag esisti.aq lifts i.a pltases - Phase 1 (2994); Phase 2 `� (1995+j: Yj � a, Lxhihitioa I - Phase 1 e. Cloud Niae - Phase 2 b. Loga Peak - Phase 1 f. olympic - Phase 2 � c. Exhi3i.tioa II - Phase 2 g. Nuqget - Phase 1 ,i d. 6raad Prix Poma - Phase 2 . !�) - 2_ Ccastsuct the followi.ag new liEts i.a phases: ;. 8shibitioa Z (high-sgeed detaehable quad with up to 1,800 � skiers/hour capaeity); Phasa 1. . b. Loge Peak (fligh-speed detachabte quad with up to 1,200 - � skiers/hour capacitp; with the stipulatioa that the pod � aeeessed by this lift be moaitored by ASC aad the Forest , 3ervice for skiar distribution and utilizatioa throughout the sk3 seasoa. Tha iaformation will ba used to make appropriate adjustments to the operatioa of this lift.); Fhase 1. - c. 8�chi.bition IZ (fixed-qrip or detachabla double lift with up � to 1,200 ski.ers/hour capaeitp); fle:i3ilitp is provided to - chaase two slightly differeat aliqameats; Phase 2. � d. Cload Niae Express (fixed-grip or hiqh-speed datachable lift �y� . . rith up to 1,800 skiars/haur capaeityy. Plexability is dllowed � � ' , !or tha placemeat ot the top termiaal-at two di#ferent loeatioas coati.ngeat npoa moaitori.aq data tor skier flow aad di.stri.butioa; Phase 2. � i 3. •Iaatall aa uadergrouad utilitp ecrridor from the base area to the Nerrp- F ' 6o-Rouad Rsstaurant ta acco�adata updated gas, water, sewar, elnetric and � , . tslephonn ssivice. Continue the uaderqrouad utility corridor from the � , I(arry-c;e-8uuad Restassrant to Loge Peak to aeeommodate upgraded water, . tslephoas and electric serviee. i` 1' . 6. Condnct sal�ctive thianiag aad gladiag betweea Lhe followi.ag ski tra9.ls: � � � � St. Noritx aad Hoomerang� betweea 6oldea Hora aad Park Aveaue, betutean ' .�;;;.� � � 7►pple ltrudel and Momeat-OE-Truth, and betwean T-Lazp-7 Catwalk and �� - ' Lzhibitioa. Nidaa T-Lazy-7 Catwalk from Prospector 6ulch to the top of • '�, "$-�"°�_ � '" �, i 3 �i � � I 1 I i . . ��:<:�.�- e.,+...::..��.:::,.....��<w._ _..-:..s.� �-..____' _--.,....�.. � - -. . .. .,...._....� ....-- .. �_ . .,, .. .._. -..�. ,a.�. _.._..-,v._�..,'. , ,. �� t y. . . . .. . . � � .. . �l . .. _�•. . . . . -_ �,• . . . . . . _ ,1._ , � 1 . . � " � . � � . � • . . "i • _. � . � . � � � ,. � . - . . . ' . � . . . . . . . . . � . . � . . � . .. � . . '� 1•.. . '. ."_ ' ... —. .. - . . . . .� . �� .. . � � . .. . . . � .. . , , . t�]C� . ' . . . , - . ' . ` j�(�• ,_.. ,.: ��a. , rt . .__..��s ,.-•s��:•:�� ._::,_ :.: : . . ..._�... .,...._. ..._.:.__.._-�- •-- _ _.._. _ ._.... , •--- ..._.. .. . _. .. �` yt,:;ti�� :�>;.:^`�. �k;'i f � 1.J . . . .'iw",3r,.�.°it�l the anrrent locatioa oE tha Nugget Lift. . 7��,`-.��. . . .,.�,�TT=�-�. _ 5. Coasolidate, reloeate aad upgrade the maiatnaancs tacflities at the base r�;.,, �i,S and the Marry-GO-Rouad area, iaclssdiag tha fual farc�, iatn ane facilitp .•y.:�:;_„ aortLasst of tha Herry-co-Houad area, Ragrade and revegetata these ;�'� ' :`1,. ; diaturbed areas as stipulated ia the EA for conditions of approval. '- ' : .� , ' }�i..__;` : '�- '• �:. ,i BTAP'F COIiMENT3: ; ';j.� �: ;, � t_ '.: -. � I. REZONING � ' i��:�i:i:-<'.`:�.� j The Aspen Skiinq company is reqtiesting approval for rezoning the ;',�' ,� i Aspen Highlands Ski Area from its current AFR-10 designation to AF- � SRI. The Land IIse Code describes the intent of the AF-SKI zone as ?�: Pallows: � � � e;�r`...':...;. E�.�>.��.. "The AF-SKI, Agricultural/Forestry Ski Zone District is �'�,� intended to provide locations for ski areas and the orderly • _;�� j � and efficient planning and review of ski areas. The AF-S�CI �' ° designation should be applied to iands which are used for downhill and cross-co�intry skiing and a variety of other uses ;•~;;", permitted or approved by a Federal or similar agency, such as grazing, hunting and passive recreational uses. Developinent 'r; activity on such lands shall be contingent upon the adoption ,�' of a master plan. The AF-SICI designation should be apolied only to ski areas which.are consistent with the Land Use Code „ policy for Development or Expansion of Ski Areas (refer to Section 2-5)." "Section 2-5: Development or Expansion of Ski Areas. It is ";�j•�` the policy of the County to favor the upper mountain exoansion - � of existing skiing areas or ne�d skiinq areas without I significant base aTea development. The County shall revie,✓ i all proposals for any proposed new ski areas or expansions of existing ski areas for conformance with County goals, policies i�, _ ' and regulations." i ,� '� The Planning Staff opinion is that the proposed Master Plan - •-- complies with the intent of the AF-SRI zone as outlined above. In , addition, it appears that the proposal is in substantial compliance with adopted community plans. Excerpts from relevant plans follow: t � ' 1976 A9pen/pitkia County Gro�rth Mauaqemeat Policy Plan � ' � . The 1976 Aspen/Pitkin County Growth Management Policy Plan (GMPP) i � , , established priorities for ski area improvements as follows: ' �: "First priority shall include any applications for <C distributien lifts which simply add to upper mountain ,,. capacity. Such activities would include those that would not � ;;;; create additianal demands for public services, commercial �� ; ; 1 _ 4 I' j I , �i _.. ..-__...^. __-_..., � _ __---- ,_... .�.�_.::..: :�.J,_...__ _ ;. .. <..._.--_-- ---Y.4.:<,: � w 1 � :.� _. ` ...._� ��-,1 � . . . _ _ . . � ��i �•y�� . � � . .. � .� , . . . . . .-. . . .� . t � J . . , ` � . � � . . i -_� . ., ' ' . . . . . . . _ - � - .�. . . . � � . . . _ . .. - . . . . . ��. �:c- � ` . �. � � . . � � . . � . ' � � �. � . . . �, , • . �-- �--- .: _. . _ . . . . � . , . . �: � . . . '. .. .. . � . . � - . � . r�r�r? .. _. � - . . � . , . . . �� ; � � — — �_ ,^'�Kdr'. . �F:� -A " . . �...a6iL''�7n'sAafc��i�;J}'.-. S`G..M''tb`.: � �;S�. °::it.'•. .. rs!� _. �Lti4��4q!..lQP4�..3'�i�li3ra�enau�i:fiW;�:`�,,,,tc:?�r`i,;ailCSbWa7F+kEc�t'x1: : ��-i;, • . . ' ' ,��l:, r;;�-�.�;-, :,�," i{� '� � � ,�.+�f �;�",. =:�'-'�s,; facilities or additional -''� `-•:. , parking (aqgravation of transportation problems, etc.) . . . ;`;�,��-�; Second ` �•;`'~� priority shall include any proposed construction _;,�•�.:�.,• � activities which add uphill, overal2 mountain capacity to any � ;, :�'i.,; `'' one of the four existing areas. ; �� ''. � . L;-.'-" . s.. y Third priority shal.l include entirely new areas which are ' `i'`�' ,- " limited to skiiag only and are accompanied by no real estate ""=`'"'a �.� : � � : p development. This includes new skiinq proposal which wou2d ' � use the existing Snowmass or Aspen base facilities and not ;�`-''-;r.'' � create the need for new community facilities to include water, � ;�j� � � sewer, roads, dramatic changes in zoning, transportation �� systems, or other capital-intensive community impacts, j „.,� Fourth riorit shall include new ski area p � �:.w . P Y pro osals which ,.; , envision new base villages and new substantial increases in i!�y� capital facilities to include water, sewer, roads, dramatic • changes in zoning, or new transportation systems. +��'�, � Excluded from consideration will be any new ski areas outside ��a'E , the Aspen/Snowmass Growth Management Areas.° � � ,,`) A review of ski area development priorities indicates that all IIses ,� - by Right faZl in the first and �econd priority. t 1992 Castle Marooa Czeek Plan. The 1992 Castle Maroon C=eek Plan called for the upgrading of the Aspen Highlands ski area. ei The Uses by Riqht and Uses Permitted by Further Review are :. � consistent with this PZan. '�� ,;t� • 1993 8spen Area Community Plan. The Plan suggests thatc � . "Ski expansions are preferred which are found to have minimaZ impacts on land development, environmental � k5. quality and service needs (i.e., expansions to existi.ng areas) over ski expansions which are found to have � substantial impacts on land development, environmental _`�.. _; quality and service needs (i.e., expansions involving new ! base villaqe or major infrastructural extensions or i upqrades or expansions into existing wilderness areas). As with any other development, ski area expansion shoul,d - . be reviewed by the community based on the goals and y ' growth limitations adopted in this Plan, and shall not be an unanticipated or unmitigated growth generator_" �� .� , ' ,' The Uses by Right are li.mited replacement lifts and will not I_ i increase the capacity of the ski area. � � }�' II. MA.70R ISSITES ; ..�� _ _ : � The recent review and approva]. of the Exhibition I and Loge Peak ' - _ � - � 5 ! (s:• i`� :5., , � � .._. .>.h,..._..---- _----....�.,..:.��..-R.�,...�:.._.. --- `" . . r� �"' , . ..: �..,... ::i M .. ,..:,n�...��.--- � -- . _ , t . � /� . .. - . . - � - >�F � . � � " . - . . . �(:�([ �. _ � � . . . , . . . .. -. .. .. . � � . _ , . . . f. K . - ri � � - �1.: � , :. . . � . � �, � �, - . _ _ . , �: _.- __ _ � ��[K . . ' . . � � . ' � . . • �M�• - I .. .Le_... ...__.... _._._.. . � + ' � .' . . � .. � . .. . 1 I .: ! .. ��v +� :n .� .� i..';.;. _ .°►�.� r�. '��t.7�.�NSxJ�y�..i!i"�i�Y-S� ;�* �..'.:. '�'�-. .�r.:::.�� ".. .� � � �� .,.� � - .r_..ra�.AI.��;:11t�Y'O.NI�f�V.�ti.�iik�ML��Fid:�.'1,.�'YA '�.��.�� . y�:j;� �._. ._ ._-_.._ (.rz •!;:i'v': �". �t �� 'v ,r;,_ -:� �;.;��`i _ lifts and associated upqrades hiqhlighted the major issues facing � .��•- �� the upgrading of the ski area. The Aspen Metro Area is currently '��'" '� in non-compliance with State and Federal air pollution standards `� `"�:�`'� for PM10. This has led to the adoption of a State Implementation �-•�!'�%,"�y. Plan (SIP) which is intended to improve the local aiz quality. The " . adoption of the SIP has led to the current Ccunty policy that ;,.<�-' `� development should not create any additional Vehicle Miles � �' " " �' ��qelled fVMT) beca�tse VMT appears to have a direct relationship .> ,�. � '•' ta PM10. At this time, the Highlands improvements cannot result "'"�_`';�' ` " ia increased VMT. As a result, the conditions of approval for the 4;+,,,,, ' recent lift improvements call for traffic mitigation, the �;�__,'r..:'' 4 implementation of� a traffic• monitoring prograat and the � � ' establishment of an air quality monitoring proqram. Because of the �� 'y ' uncertainties regarding new traffic generation related to lift and �'{- - � mountain improvements, the staff believes that a phased development �+.��; . ` a roach, cou led with ood monitorin �'�" pp p q q programs is a prudent way 7�% � to develop this mountain. All activities listed as "Further ��t'.�l Review'� in the Master PLan will be required to show that no 1; � increase in PM10 will zesult from improvements to the ski area. �:;�`; In this regard, the staff supports a phased development program at `"� Aspen Highlands. Phase I includes the improvements approved for 1994. Phase II includes the additional lifts for the existing _ mountain, which would include the Moore/School lift, new Exhibition II and Cloud Nine lifts, and the removal of the existing Exhibition II, Grand Prix, Czou@ Nine and OZympic lifts. The staff supnorts �t the Moare/School lift; this lift is located so that impacts to the existinq Highlands subdivision should be minimal. In addi.tion, it is the sta£f opinion that this lift may help to alleviate some of '"::� the parking issues at the main base area. This phase should be :', ' iplaced in the further reviea category; its i.mplementation would depend on the results of the air and traffic monitoring proqrams , and approved mitigation strategies, if necessary. ' Phase III is placed in the furthez .review category and would ''�' include the Thunderbowl and Steeplechase lifts. Phase IV would � include the Highlands Bowl lift, pendinq the results of the Federal �� •; EA/EIS processes and adequate mitigation of impacts generated by `-— earlier project phases. ! III. MASTER PLAN DETAILS , . . � The following review will discuss those sections of the master plan that should be amended or revised. , � •' , 1. Paqe 2, second paragraph: The applicant requests that the ' � . County a11ow "replacement facilities as uses by right". The staff opinion is that replacement facilities should require �� further review i£ they difPer in any way from those facilities ��,y that they are replacing. This determination shall be made by p� -°- the PZanning Director. �', . ;�;;, ..G�. . - �'.:.I. - . � "� �. 6 ' +! ,� � -_`"_'.._.�.��--_... -.,--.�+. .... ..... ..._,.��--� � _.._�.:��r=. �e-..�-- .a.,.. '.�.t, -.t..� .�...�..,.�.:.-i.:,�....^-_.....y-.._. . . _� ��41 � ' � . . ..�..,a. ..:.� � , o. ._ _ , j � _ . . ' . . � . � . ' ... . � 9 i-':: K:.. ^ . . .. . . . . . t� ... - . . . . . . . � ��j:` . �/ . . . . ' V' .. - � � . . 1. . � � . . . • .. � . . . . . . � . ,.. . . ��.�.. 4 �.�:. `�� .. . � � . . � � . . . .. . . .. � � � . � � � .. �� . � . .. . . .. . ..� .. _� .�. . .. . . . . . � . . �: . . . �. - . .. . . . . . . ��.+.1f�: . . " . �. . .. � ' • �'� i��' _ � __ � �.�_ �--- �-- __� _.....�-- ,.._.. ;.,�.. :. , , �v..::',-�� :,c��:�a,.. - .n • . .... . . � . ._ .. . . ..._ . . ._..._ ,'c'I,. - 3y�1` .i .!•� �r�� L!�s� 2. Page 12, Review Process: This section requests that all !:�'� `�= , e�cisting uses and activities and those approved by.the U.S. �1,.:,.� Forest Service pursuant to an Environmental Assessment (EA) F-:.r, .� be considered "Activities and Uses Allowed by Right". The "'� staff a inion is that activities which re '�'� '�-� p' quire an EA should �� 1 ,..� . be placed in the "further review" category, unless previously �:,;, ;; ,':' " approved by the County as part of this Master Plan. Existinq ��t�� . ,, uses and activities should be defined in this Master Plan so s '�•� '` a ??}';��:� r` ,, that future confusion is avoided. Activities which have $��r< a insubstantial i.mpacts should xequira Planning Director '•�:�: ` ; approval. IP the Planning Director does not approve an :r:::�:�` � , ;r: insubstantial activity, gurther review would be required. �:.,..._.. 3. Page 30, Table 6: The square footage listed should be verified by the applicant by review throagh the PZanning � Department. .y:��. 4. Page 38, Loge Peak: The description of this lift should •`�7 include the revised operati.ng plan which starts with an .. I initial lift speed of 840 persans per hour (pph) to a maximum i of 1,200 pph. � 5. Page 47, .Delivery Capacity: Parking capacity should be ; adjusted to 2.5 skiers per car as agreed to previously. The '''' - access staginq should be consistently based on a 2 hour period � (oz 2.5 hours) rather than .mixing time periods. It is not clear why parkinq in this section is listed at 450 spaces �' rather than the 742 spaces used previously. It is also not clear how the Highlands bed base was determined. It is also not clear why the school lift was included in mountain access, c;� since it is not an initial access lift. The applicant should � � . explain these discrepancies at the meeting and adjust the Plan accordingly if necessary. I 6. Page 52, Phase II: The applicant requests that Phase II be allowed as a Use by Right subject to satisfactory results { being obtained from the proposed traffic and air quality , monitoring programs. The staff opinion is that Phase II ! � "� should be placed in the "Eurther Review" category because we � do not know what the results of the monitoring program will be. While the applicant has proposed tra£fic and air quality monitoring programs, they have not yet been approved by the ;{ Environmental Health Department for SIP compliance. '� I 7. Page 56, Listinq of Uses, Se•:tion A, Uses and Activities �. . I Allowed by Right Al1 Year: �1 - All existing uses and f� activities should be spec3fica22y listed to avoid confusion �; . � in the future. #2 - the staff recommends that only Phasa I � improvements be allowed by right at this time. ,� I2 should �� ! state that this is the existing Pitkin County Communication �t j transmission site; new facilities should require further t` ;�"� � review. #l5 - delete the reference to the GMQS Code section. r .��; � . �,��. .i - ; � �y 1, � E�: i ; � � . �,�i. . ......:. . ..:......i.J,....�._ __„—.:. .. ' .�07.,_ . ... . .. .°:. ,..,.... . -- -- nn�1 ' ..�.... . _ . ' ' . . . -.:f:, u. -.' . . y�t . , 9 ,�� -i � . . . .. . _ . . . . . . . �r+� .� J � , � ' - � . . - .� � .. . �: - . . . . __.. . . ''1 . � ` ' � � . . . . . . � . .:� . � . . . .. . � � .. . � . � . . . .. i � . . � . .. -, :_ .� .. ._�_ �._'- �,... .. � :._•:..,_, .. . . � . . f � . . �; . � _ � � . � � � . . � . . . . . ' ,�.�=T . . .. . . . . � , ��. w� . � _ � �. �_ __�_.__ � .,,�.�..� __- --____�_. v..��.� _._ a,,..� .: � > - . . .. . ., , �y, ,.. , �,..y �� `,p�� . . �..4_�C+��«:i�,a��Y�lYdi��ax.•:.�'l�fY'..":.r......iL: "'�i : -�._ �.._:-.:.��d� ,_ i..:."..--...?�fi�►[�S[tiYe$,.is4tli�i��:17''u1'.'11:::,'�-'�W:�li;tii.:.iim�✓�u.w /',�,'y-t'T4iiC•,�,,� . , ?:ii�fs'y'�;: �"'�'� . ? � .:s � �` , '� ,�� {j #16 - building e�cpansions of 10� or 1,000 square Eeet shauld 7 �-, a ' say "whichever is less". , . �`� c.•. -_.: � '�.3 8. . Page 58, IIses Allowed During the Traditional Ski Season: ,�8, �'.�`;'>�._, � . � Accessory 9ui2dings - existing buildings have been described �`:' � +�, and their square footage documented; this should be verified c'::�>�� by the Planning Department. New accessory buildinqs should �'�i ` ' require further review. � �� d . �,�:,_ __ - 9. Master Plan Supplement, Page 1, Item 2, Documentation of - Employees: Prior to ginal Master Plan and Re2oning approval, '.�- ;• � the appli�ant should document the nwnber of existing ski area �,:�;;,;�,.;._.. : employees to the satisfaction of the Aspen/Pitkin Housing �1 � Office. Prior to the beginninq of any additional improvement �� '� � phase, emplayee numhers shall be re-documented with the " T Housi.ng Office. The year followinq any phase of improvements <Q': � should be re-documented with the Housing Office to monitor . empZcyee generation. Any additional employee generation , should be mitigated according to the then existing County '� � requirements. Employee documentation and a future auditing 3� - program should be approved by the Housinq Authority. R8C0lQt8NDATION: The Planning staff recommends Rezoning and Master � Plan approval subject to the changes and modifications recommended � ia "Master Plan Details, in the above memorandum. In addition, the approvals granted this year, including map revisions, should be _ I incorporated into the Master Plan. i . � slw\f�tic:highlands.ski.pz si j . 1 , - 4 _1 � , ;:. �; ;; .. ,- :, ; ; ; � _-- i . . ;� ,, : ; : �� ,,� . . . . � . .. . - . . . - : � .. .. .. � ..{ ��1'F . . .. ' .. . . . - . . � � . �. .. ' . . � � . . . . � � . . . .. . . . , . +Lf . i � . � . � . . - . � . . . . . - � � t }�tl;� +'� ' . . ' . . .. ' . . . . . � � l �e'+:�''j ' . . , .. . . 8 . ._ . . . �, .' - - . . . .. � . � . . . . . ��I'�.. . . � .. . , ' . . . . . �,� . - . . � . . . . . �f�. . . . . . . , . _ .. - � �. � . � 'i : . �� _ - . . ... .. . . .. ....�., ... . . , ...... ��.. +..�.._:.�.. ...r....^---_-.,.-_... . .,.. _ _... .. , �_ . .. -; . i. �� , _ � '� ,:,. 7 .�f�, �' r � , , , '� � ` 1, �t �r � • _ �-� � 1 ' ' '� � , .. , ,._ ,� , , , .- _ . � ? __. T . ..P= , - •— -- .:,�;: - - l ' . ., . ... ....' .. ''. , < ',...: ' . ..,'' . . - ' .. � _... . .. � ' � � ��: . � . . .. � . . . ��'� � . r�� -I��S+�'�' Iy a �1 . .. � � �.j r, _ . " '�! � LY4 �tI ' 1.� • �•�{-A h; 4t�� y�; ��`��y'n�'N9 J' ��.N�� 'k:� .5' � .g� y�,�.� r �h.'i,:M; .;r,,�. w,.�r.�„ � _wFiut '� a:i..� -,�4` ^11k. ��!.lp.�� ,� °`.'.M l'3. 6�[r. er��F�;S�+:' � � ti �(�+ . ; N ' :�;� `4'' i � _� f��. .:�:1 �� AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY "�� i� . ' ir a TO: Pitkin County Board of County Commi.ssionezs � ' A ' , , �,,,.� . „ � Regular Meeting - December 6, 1995 i;';w, 3 �7..'.��. . THRU: Cindy Houben, Community Development Director k'•� .1_ � � RE: Balcomb/Stephenson 1041 Hazard Review & Second Reading �' ' �s: for Rezoning �� .. . _._. `t , FROM: E21en Sassano, Planner __='______________==_______=__====-=______=___=_====-s� SIIMMARY:`vThe Planning Commission recommends approval of the �� proposed rezoning from RS-30 to Rural/Remote, and denial of the �" 1U41 Hazard Review. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning and (` tabling of the 1041 Review to a date certain. � REQUEST: Acknowledging a pending denial, the applicants request �� tabling of the 1041 review for their properties. They wish to , proceed with rezoning of the parcels from RS-3o to the Rural/Remote ; Zone District in ordeY- to posture the parcels as '�Preservation Sites" from which development rzghts can be transferred. ` BACRGROIIND: On October 25, 1995, the Board reviewed the application, approved the rezoning on lst Reading, set the public hearing for 2nd Reading, and continued the public hearing for the 1041 Aeview. APPLICANT: Scott Balcomb and Richard Stephenson , + APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: John Kelly, Oates, Hughes & Knezevich . � LOCATTON: The two parcels are located in Sections 15 and 22, ; Township 8 South, Range 89 West, to the north of the Spring Gulch `� drainage in the Crystal River Valley. , `a I55IIES: - --r , �., 1. The proposed building envelopes are located within an Elk '=� production area, and proposed driveway improvements impact slopes exceeding 30� in grade. The Land Use Code prohibits � • � development under both circumstances. � ! " 2. The recently adopted amended Rural/Remote 2one District `+ regulation identifies the metro area and the expanded housing �! ; ' study area of the Aspen Area Community Plan (up-valley of ' ' • . Aspen Village) as the "receiving area" for development rights transferYed from the Little Anhie/Richmond Hill, Maroon/Castle, Independence/Lincoln and Woody Creek/Hunter : Creek "preservation areas." Development rights from a '" -, preservation site located within the Fryingpan Planning Area ��„ may only be transferred to a receiver site located within the non-metro area of Pitkin County. ii k � � . , y.+...,,,a:.r:...F...ti..�.....+----- '----+..�.wes�:..*r'v`.lrunk'6,n.n .,.. ~� M......r a .:5�. .., _.. .,,...ti�`.y....:v...-.-'....::....-..-�----� ' __1��i. Y� �, a yr e -. � ' Ws '+ ' ? J ,� � , • '" __ . i . . � . � , - ._. . - . . � �k-� . �� i . � . . . . ..:i . ... � � � �. � � � � � � � .. . . . - � . . . . - � . . . i'..�: , . .. ' --- . � � '- . _ � .. .. -. . ' ., ... , . � . . ,. �I . . :�g-Sr��: � . . . . ' - . ' . . . . � � . . . . , , . �y!.. � .. , r �� , � . � ..�..�.., _ _ . . ^ , r. .� -i „ �_�... IPf&5�t'yitlYrtldlyt►'�,1.:<.,, n.Y:.t�:u�.�A:.+.»aG"A'f � �•�.:I��.n::9'_��P�:•,e•�ti1;�:�., i'li[,r�-� � � ... ��. ..��:dleF��e`telb�lfr" . ,�5� �.¢i`.' �h :i As the regulation does not address receiver sites for rights i-, , transferred from independently proposed rezoning ' parcels, �,°> � Staff recommends that the Board establish a specific receiving : ,�"1 - area as part of the Balcomb/Stephenson Rezoning. Based on ` i:, ' Board direction given throughout the recent Rural/Remote hearings, Staff recommends that the receiving area be limited to the Non-Metro Area of Pitkin County, as are the other down- s;• valley sites within the Rural/Remote Zone district. '` � the Board re ested comments from the t _ - - 2. At first . reading, � Crystal River Caucus with respect.to the application. Having r " reviewed the application, the Caucus recommends approval of � the request subject to conformance with the Rural/Remote zone 4� ' district regulations. A copy of the October 25th Staff inemorandum containing a detailed analysis of compliance with 1041 and rezoning regulations of the Land Use Code, is attached for reference. . -v: �RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed rezoning from RS-30 to Rural/Remote, and denial of the � 1041 Hazard Review. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning and � tabling of the ,lo41 Review to a date,certain. a � � ��;� ��, y � � � ` - •i. - . - . t . �, . f�_. \ . a _ , � � i� ._ . � . _ , _ . ., . , 1 ,.y �I :��- , . . . .' .. �:� . . - . . � . . � � . � . � . �..� '..' ..�. ' ..:.. :. . � . . . .. . � . � . � .•i � . .. . . . . . . .. . . � . '� �� ` .. �' .. � ;"".. .:��. . � . . . . . . . � . � .. � �1.Y�.�: . �. ; .. � . ' . . . . ;.. . - .�.. . . �. . . . .. - . �� : ,., ' . . . . . . . I.. ,�.Y . . . ' . . .. . .. � " . . . � � . . . .. . .- .. . � . ��.` .. . .. . . . � . .. � . '�.'.7 �� . . . . . . . � j � �9 _ 2 �ll. . �,: . ,. : ��;; , � �.:�� , ,�,, r.� �' ' -�� y , �`E t � '.n7�4i - .. f �`c `' � r�',` J 1 i a' a ',� • s . t '4 1 '_y - \ ��+Ft � 1 � � 1 7,"{ �' ' _ . _/ t♦ ,, , r}„ r r; 'f . � , .:,. . + _ s �' _ �' . '_ "+' � - h:�F. -- - _ - .. �: '` ��,�, • _ ,.�. . . � ��...r::7�.��:� fh-. �� rr r�i'., . . ,�eS'i / iti��t�,�✓'.�,�^�4�t�r ,}��,,i�/��,��YY�r �+t�,J"��.�` � 1b x n y ��-"' r'l�b li.. ��t �•'�'': "sNc` It�:� :1� �'\9�7'1�3`.,��aAf+lutlNA+��rdt`�6`�.!�.. :.tf3�`�•�� f�f `�� tj �� :a Y'� Z' ` `�r �'...�°' �^,- -;��, _i i:},��•'�,t'�z r '' AGENDA ITEM SII2�4lARY . �s:.'c 4 ��s t � 4.. y TO: Board of County Commissioners �� '4 r �i Regular Meeting - December 6, 1995 � �. o _ -- `� THRU: Cindy Houhen, Community Development Director 1 4�F-�"r � . �i�� . fi�3;..in:,""".,;.. � RE: Hardy Subdivision Detailed Submission '. � ; � C.5 FROM: Ellen Sassano, Planner " � --------- k,;:4 . --------------------------------------- _��----- ------------------------------------- S �` . SIIMMARY: The Planning Commission and Staff recommend conditional i,��9 approval of the application. � ' ` REQIIEST: The applicant requests Detailed Submission approval for •,;�r�% the subdivision of approximately 121 acres of land into four single f' family residential lots ranqing in size from approximately 25 to ,�,-; 37 acres. ' The subdivision received General Submission approval pursuant to Resolution 94-61 and Growth Management allocations for three single family residences pursuant to Resolution Numbers 94-46 and 94-168. �';;:�. APPLZCANT: Gordon A. Hardy ;f�r` r LOCATION: The parcel is located on the west side of Castle Creek - Road approximately 1 1/2 miles south. of its intersection with Maroon C"reek Road. i:, - j ISSIIES: � 1. The proximity of building envelopes to high �valanche hazard �' ' "� was the primary issue at General Submission. As requested, the ; -'�--- applicant has moved the building envelopes on Lots 1 and 2 further � downslope to increase the distance from the avalanche red zone, and �;: " an envelope which is removed from the red zone was established for Lot 3. (Avalanche hazard does not impact Lot 4) . The modified � env�lopes increase distance from the high hazard zone without ' significantly increasing visual impacts or encrcaching into the ' . . i irrigated meadow areas. i • . 2. The applicant has agreed to comply with the conditions , �� contained within the attached Resolution. I r The attached Staff inemorandum contains a detailed analysis of �i� ;:?;;: � compliance with Detailed Submission regulations of the Land Use ,:^ , •'°_ .� Code. . �� r. �'� i � I � ��: , � ; �;.�..�,. �.��.,.;: ' _ _ ---_...� ..::��,.�,..:�:s�a.... — ��::. �_ ��,; �� : .�.��,r.��;a.�.�.,�r:;W a_ _ �.._..—--- -- � � ` � +'. r':� f . I � �. ,I„ t . „ . , . . ,.� , � . ., , � . . ,- . . ... .._.. �� - q- . . �.... . i . . .. . . ,.`.-t ' . ... . .. . .. . r � 1 .. ' . . . - ' . 1 . . ' . � ' . . - . ; � ., .� . . ' .. . � .. .. . . � . � ' I .• . . ., . . ; . .. .. . • . . .. .. . . � . . : � . - � . � . ' . �. . �t � . . , . . -. . _- _ ' . ' ' i 1_� - � . _ � . . . _ . . . . . � �. a . ' .. � .. ... ' . � .... . �_ . . ' � � .\�� _ � ' .. . . . . . ��. ' ' �� .� _.__ __ ,�.�.. �, --� �I.tiv', ':�.+f"1.�IK.:"t.(�Cf�SF�''� . M:.. n �a . _.. . -. . ,... - � . :�a:si 3�K:i:b61i'rFC"P�YYnf/'�1tL'IY" +••wv�f:a%yrpny.ewe•^� '�7r � ` . p.� +� . . .. . . � . . . . . . � . � . . � 4 � � . . . . � � . . . ... ;.t ��.. � RECOMMENDATION: f�,,' ' The Planning Commission and Staff recommend conditional approval ��;� y; ". _ of the application. •.� . . - ��'��'r Z.�. - . � . . � .. . .. . �t.' t ais hardy_subd txT y _ +�Y s; � F . � � +�'��y� !Y . . . . . . }.'#7 . ' . ... . . , . �+`�?C --- � � . 41 ,.t r 1 {i*: �, '.'.- . .... ..�.. .�..� ;�... . ' . ..: . :.. .� -.:. ' ' .' �t�4 1`... -_:�.., ;� . '._ �: , :.. .. '. -�- �...��. � -� :. � : ?i' �t3 ,'� � � � �_ \{ I _ �� '� ----".i � . i� :I � . . � K ' .i,�. . . . � '.,L'.� .� a•: . . . .. ".t.�� ti :._. . .:.;, � � � 2 �, ,4, i;�,. 3: ,,,. _ � � , � �. , � 9� i \ ♦ t . f ..�` / "' r "S �c L 4.: Y"a �+J� ' t f ,��.,��.:'. . .,�.., a t k ° � - �' i , ' �.��'x � J � �,ra� -.e .a � t t f i .� � ''v ! 1+' � a?� s *..°s�a,�� .. .�� Y s (T 1 f ' \ ; � {C'"�'�"" �1 �a :x - � ., � �� s w�, � ' ,•,«f` � ,,,x ` i r ��t r � : � �>s < s a �}�K 4-�l l � /�t� � �. 1 .'1 � �: � �s�}Y�_ [.�' 1 �'+ -.� '.; �' 1 '} � p ft't � �*- �[.� t' I . ��1�� .4 ..� 'r . .. ; �,as � ' < ,., ;. _ � r � y f ;{ � - �_ _ .. � � , � ' . � ' -� . . - � ' �. :� . , � . .,�. .. . .. . . a ' ` ._...._ _ . ..__.. .. ...! wiri+w..rr�r. ..__. _ .�r �"�'"�nl.+°'�--- . tai["� . . . ..' ' � . .. ♦ �. ...R.: .`:tti'ht/.LA4!{�7M+Att�w(Sildil:S�� r A ...�.... " .�'�`� � . � �� AsP� Tt��s � , ��, . Tt�� ' . . r�- uo:�L =+��: _ � . Aspen,Colurado %�•;:"`� ,. ._� z.,, ' � ' PROOr Or PUI3LICAlION � �.. STAT6 OF COLORADO) '' � )ss. Copy of Notice ""'�' : _. .,.. ..:. -: . ...:.... _ • - -�c- � Caunty of Pitkin ) � t `''+:.; I.Andy Slori�do solemnly swear lh�l 1 am lhc[idilor ln Chlef v[TH6 ASPEN TIMES:lhal Ihe same Is a weekly ' hewspaper printed,ln,whole or in part,nnd pablished in 'y the Counly of Pitkin,Stale of Colorado,nnd has u general � circulation thereln;that said newspaper has been pub- � .• Ushed continuously and unlnlerruptedly in said County .,i,;i;yr i>r�,:?uaucNOnce,�:�, �w �y � of Pilkin,for a pedod of more lhan[l[ty-lwo wnseculive s;.rroncE�sxmmycrv�nuten�eo..am; 'w weeks next dor to lhe[irst ablication of lhe annexed t`�°°"'�-�°'°'"�z'°"°�"�' �Vrmxlfna', ; f'o,'`q'becemners irn and arter■a ipna�ad-: legal notice or advertisemen�Ihal said newspaper has �pu6��c h rl L pbll hed fe.lh�We�k a; i Ednbna!�+ A,Pen nmes oqNnrmnne n!"j � been admitted to the United States mails as second class t:�vss.wawmuKim�nso,m�Rassa�: ' � malter under l6e rovislons o[lfie Acl of March 3,1879 1,-='w�°ND�!'N�OFTH�aO'1RDOFCO�' i�} P � 'cw+M�onFnsoernwrco�xtiv simna or any amendments lhereof,and lhat said newspaper is a ws:Try6sou u us'rx�tiwe.��1r�euuNCc qyTR�C'I' QOP77NC A LFAS�AOR�M�_. . a weekly newspaper duly qualified[or publisidng legal fieerwe�TNEASPEN VALLEY H05%TAL nolices end adverUsements willt 4he mcaning of lLe laws `Dar,T�R��„�',T AND THE ASPfN ANOUTANCE. � of the State of Cnlocado. !copa d u:�Wn wa a ms ora��.issaa; , -..��to._w��p ii&i uoW xw m.� �:i3u,ameom�auKcwkmartama�.sw; . L;�itMalo9tree�papen Cobnd BY611 PM�::;: That lhe annexed tegal noUce or adverlisemenl tivas pub- 9TOS:as�eo ;- -�->: -x � i>"'• - lished In lhe re ulaz and entire issue of ever nutnbcr of " `" '�"""'°"`�Depu"'Oo°"�'a"`` B Y r�bwnea m ine�eam nma.on oaemner� sald weekly newspaper for the peiiod o[_�consecu- �e�� ` : tive Insettlons;and lhat the[Irst publlcalion of said notice - s in the lssue of said newsp�per daled C.. b A.D.,19�� and lhat ltie lusl pub- . lic tion f said nolice was in lhe issue o[said newspaper . dated��A.D..19��. ,�' A � . ` , . Subscrib d and sworn to be(ore me, a nolary �� public in d[or the C nty o[Pllkln,Sl�le o[Colorado, i , -� on U�Is �� day o A.D.,19 Q�. �,� - . � Notaty Pu lic � My commission expires e('c{"�� ' ' y � � � r, � . �,�' � :.. . .;, . . . . . . t�� •:,E`�b O . ,� , g. � . '�"��iwp1 a { ;�} � t- �j 1.. � „ n o : � _v - . . � . � t � '` �'� `� .v. ,. �� 1� �0 �y t . � � 0 , . / s` / '�N��, � . � � r f,{n.t5 .f�,I - ��F'� "".xf 'a�-- '�.s.""x'� - pp� t �� .. . --�a�Liti�y� `}-�j y -- �. 1 � . • �-, . . ��[i � � �;t J . . .. , , , � . , 1 ., . . �� '.. - s � � . . �. . � =.i,7;.t i . . . .. _ . „ , . , . � , ��.. . . . . � � . � � . . � . ,<,�,: . � �. ,. �-.. . . � . . �. .. . , . , ! . . . :�. .. �,. . � ,.: . . . . . . . . . �: ,.�.. . . . �. :�. � ..-� . - � . _ �.:. . . . . . � .': ,..... .:— -.�.�_. ,_. ._- . -'"�!._.., - _ .� . �:�!!. • ��'�d""'- : >� _ .�. �� _ . � ' , � 1 (,�f.�Ya, f Y'1 �';-w�: . ..!'•� .�1�EllLI'�'�1�.��'�r- �( . . ,,�y . I.w�'..�F�� . y"9�� Jl...�-y[' ....,.... .��1!'>��ki�b71�-�SL��hwfrGl:.'::.PTSu�i�w.T�1{ ^ �'i.� ; � �vz L . �: , � � rq,.:lili..� =,i i • Y# n � �� ;;�tt,' �s� Tt� s :,� � `� . . P''�' ' .. ` � Box E � `�. . � ' � Aspen,Colarado 4 �``� ' . . . . � i.'�.�,�_..::��tr PR40F OF PUI3LICATION ` �-��. -.-- - STATE OF COLORADO}, s �;: r , . )±�• Copy of Notice :;,�;:::;.':. Cowtty of Pitkin ) �:";:.: � ;;;:`�s. I,Andy Sfor�e,do solemnly swear that I am the Editor ; in Chief of THE ASPEN TlMES:that the same is a weekly � ' newspaper printed,in,who(e or in part,and publisiied in � �:� the County of Pitkin,State of Colorado,and has a eneral � '"�� ' S �surx�+r�e�eenowwnwrron� •" '1 � circulation thereln;that said newspaper has been pub- ��°0fl'��+��•- t+m�ce�.hveev Nven uut,avv�m�m�i-. h,� :.0.; Iished confinvously and uninterruptedly in said County :nwonn.aooeou�iss�euaQnh..nron,�a af Pitkin,for a nod of mote than Fift -two consecutive =�«�o�ee r�aun r.�r.eow�rcdi�y f �. -� � Y f�C nunWlooerr.A top�ot�the mppid'qeMal�� weeks next prior to the ffrst pu6lication of the annexed roa^p^�O4"��^��fl��--: .a uwn�v.uoo oqtee o�:me wro noo..i: � fegal notice or adveMtsement;that said newspaper has 'swE.+ek�osu«�,�.Pm,.cowm,.,�a+.: � been admitted to the United States mails as second class ?'��,��,�^,�"P��;; � matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3,7879, �."U'°eC°""°'��''�'^°`B°'"°ac�y` - :Commksiunera��MatNt Room:�Mtkln CouMy��, •• or any emendments thereof,and that said newspaper is a :cou�mo�.�,ri.L.em�d�o`;sto t..e'_et,��-: ? .: .�.�. �strxf,/uVWi:Cotoreda(u�P�ik neani�gs�.; ., a weekly newspaper duly quallfied for publishing legal i=',��,,,��.r,�s�oP.q�nw,,�n�s;�m; t; notices and advedisements with fhe meaning of the iaws ;,�?�"!�«"•"°�"`"°d a."�a�ain+'a.. eammwu wnh reprd to tAe vroposed�: 1:. of the State of Colorado. c:a,a�n w�.u.m:weue nwu,t er oy m;,._ . .- � ,,�[L7��P Bud@et:M�ector u 92P.: That the annexed le al notice or advertisement was ub- °-��OPO�°� - g P `T f rra u�;r�uv.a�w�+s � _ lished in the regular and entire issue of ev ry namber of ��m'��T: : said weekly newspaper for the period of�consecu- «c°enr��e�d�a 3: �naeo'; tive insertions;and that the GrsE publication of said notice �-RoidindBitdR1Aind •��'! was in the issue of said newspaper dated :a.s�cmc�Nxr.<rmwir:�a csi,� � �5. �C� A.D.,19� and lhat the last pub- ��'„aHOO��w„"d,Wiad l410 ,, lication sa�d noNce was in the issue of said newspaPer TM"""dK�� . .o, ; dated_��_A.D.,I9�_, fE�[UNItEl4DOtPENOfNRES� �9,916:.' , � ( .= BOARDOPCOIMlY_COMMKSIONERS: . '� . � �`'-t''�„�'al�_OFPf11CC7 Nld,dl'Y CO]ARADO-. . i F.4h�:BylMehie!'C;&dand ChYrmsn�'� � � �,WhIFaM1eAh177ieAsPm77melNov7�1�'.',.; �. � ) c� ' Subscr ed and sworn to before me, a no[ary � �`� public in d far the Co nty of itkin,State of Colorado, �� on this day of er` A.D.,14 �_. . � � �' 4� Notary Pub ic " , ;�, ^�> - My commission expires�� . �;.a : ,_ . . l�; .G .� .YY, � � , R'� � '�f�� `�) � ��, � �': :i_'.�'. . � ' "�'"�� _ . �� _ + . � - `- "`''Jln�1 �', �., . �`� � s'�� , .. ��. �. ,�ry� , �� ,,ar�� .i , , ' ` ,:! '; ;,. _ .. � `�� rp��'�.�i2�`+th.�d`�!�'�°.�z"t'�+1�k-1y'`�w'vq'u":.Y, '�.ta,tti��::k..d...,4tu.i:-.a 5....s....-.. ..�.z:,.�.N. '� Fv ..,. u 1 � + � �t � ... �� . ._ .. .. , . �`� ,1 . � 1 S _ � .i �- ._ . . . .. ��-`� - � ... - . . � �i�' � . ' F . .. " . . � , 1' . . . . . � . . ' . � �' . . . � .. � � - - T - . . . .. ' . .. ' 'f . ��y'�'y_�. ,. .. :. . . . . .... . � ... . . . � CT ."f.- - � � • ' • � � J " . 1 T6��..��..)`��Zr�..F."j.d•,,y �+ � , � � ..,�c� .v�` ,� , 'n'I'914� �,:. .��'+' +,''r`m1'.i`�is"3 , . .�,.�...,y,f ,,,�y� •.� A r .'� �. ,>y�� .��,.,.. , r �,`+�!,;"` � � . oL �r`,_ ; � � T� � :.; � AsP�t� T .. �..��z, r�� T.�.�. :, . . . . rr �'�: ; � UOX� �=,-`: 3° ....a� As�en,Colorado :r ,.;;-;a . . . . . y f . ,. FROOF Or PUBLICATI�N �< `+ _ STATE OF COLORADO j �,� ;' )ss. Copy of Nolice � � . (:;X : Cou►�ty of Pitkin ) 'C� =:.,;r,::;.". I,Audy Sfone,do salemnly swear lh�l I im U�e I;Jllor in Chtef of TI iH ASPEN 17MGS:lhat ltie same is a weckty newspaper prtnled,in,whole oc in part,and pitblished in -'`•�` ' the County of Pilkln,Stale of Colorado,nnd has a genernl `�� cYrculallon therein;lhaF snid newspaper has been�ub- n��f_tx eueucnoiui' '° t(shed mnNnuoasly artd uninterruptedly in said Counly � PlEA56 TAKE N0110E Tlut the Bwrd ot ; � • of Pllkln,tor a perSod of more than Cft -two consecuUve y,Cdunfy ConmU t6ner of P�Mq C u ty ,`- y Cobeido��t Ib e`iyulir�meetl6y a`fUweoiba6�.;' ..',}: weeks next prfor fo the titst pubHcalion of tlte�nnexec! sl�s±!w+na+a�h+�a�a��,•�.�e..: � legai notice or advertisemenl;lhat said newspaper has ��ndpesoi�anwn�"�°"'��i��cm�nvrc;: �r .�OYMISSIONFRS"�.OF MTKtNS�COUNTY,;� ''� been admltted to Ihe United Slales mails as second ciass F,.COlANADD,P.ROYfD.iNGSUP,PiEMENTA6::. " i � matler under lhe provisions o[llie Ad o[Match 3,1879, "pP�?�u'�'�TME��Bw�x�' �? E SUMMARYOFPROPbSEDCFGNCFS': or any amendments lhereof,artd lhat sald newspaper is� r+u�a��..w�.s a weekl news a er dul uafiGed[or ublishin le at � CHFNO�7°"�� NJD`� "� Y p P Y 4 P S 6 W•r�"'.�� : �nim : � nolices and advertisements with llae meaning o[Uu laavs �,�d� of the State of Colorado. o�:sv.a�: ��sT.�ws - os c�c s�r�r�wi r�a•:�si.s� � � WtlllamsWmdsCanawctbntYmd .1N ! = 17iat the annexed Ie al not3ce or advedisemenl was �ub- `�'t°"`w��°"°°"`°°"F'"'° ` a : '"`, ' g I� TvIMd¢e mnsHnUbn FuM� .��: D -- . , lished in fhe regutaz and entire issue o[every nwitbcr of ��p�F�� ;�,y,6� said weekly newspaper[or lhe period of�_consecu- c��w uk mn��a�n��iww�..4; m t lve lnser t ions;an d t hat t he[irst u blication of said nolice "a0"'��°`P"!''�`"!'o""°°"`°°''°�°��o' . }� �30 P M { th otflc (the Clerk nd. . as In the isstte of said newspaper dnled R��e� sas e.:t�+,m Street :4pan cobweoa�e��rno�w�soa�aa, z �,, A.D.,19 � end Iliat lhe lasl pub- la�u i�,o�eyco�yira�n : . ltcellon f sai notice was in the issue o[said newspaper ` �A'��'d1n7hn"'a°T11Atl°"°ett°'�''' dated `(o A.D.,19��. �' - ;> _ . . ;. '. '4 : � . Subscri ed and sworn to be[ore me, a rtotnry � � puUitc ln nd tor the C unty ot Pilkin,State o[Colondu, 4 on thts , .day of A.U.,]9 4S` . . ' _ f` � Notary Pub ic ,:. , � My commission ex�}res � "Q� ': . , �JC7� P :G. ti� ,Y�'j �,- �' k _�;., � �� # '` c, ,! � .*'�: � : V �� i 's T' � � ' �� , �'�:�i.�r/\ � •��OO 1f• i"°. � ��•v' �� ' � i ,, r�i�iF,: �j t ;� i � • � .,.r..r�.aazr:+��vx�Ya�'%;Fern^:DS+�a7Ls^zc+,�r'..:�.:: .�:.v.:x:aK,._,„, r�>r rr.-'""---"" �� .uu*��f.ciC'�-y. •„h'�,.""_"__ ., 4 .. ,-. _ , . . , ,� � . ' 4. . . . .. ' i� ? x w-. f t '' � t; { J 1 } , _ �. �� . � . ,, :�� . ; _ , , �. � , - ._.� _ . � � ` _ ; .. ��z�,< _ _ : — . ,,��: - . � .a �._.,_,._ �.. e ��r � ��. , � � �s,� �'��ua��x��k�� s`�"�j.'�t;'4:i „�� eliS i . '.'t...i�� .°evs�ti�a.�'��`�!\�i�ll��"'��52�&Ss�.Ea`�;i'�^"�,F�, j ._;_.._.�._.______.._..___...._.. . s 5�1� ,; • ,: , . '� �,� � Tt�� P��' Tt�t�� f.,:-�r:.: _ .� � .� � �r �i. ' � AspetB Cu rac(o s ,..- y,s � , c.:;:.:: � PR��F OF PUBLICATION f � '� ._ _ .b �� '� STATE OF COLORADO) � ,, . • )ss. Copy of Notice '" , :�::- CounEy of Pitkin } �� I,Axdy Stone,do solemnly swear that I am thc Edilor �:.'` in Chief of THE ASPEi�111MES:that the same is a week)y � newspaper printed,in,whole or in part,and published in � the County of Pickin,State of Colorado,and has a general `c'• cicculation therein;that said newspaper has becn pub- k lished continuously and uninteaupted(y in said Counly � �°�.'�-*�,-3"�' ' ' ` 4 r=�1 �` � of Pitkin,for a eriod of more than fiEt -two conseculive E�CNOT��' P y RMm amew t�tmtAL'�r�ra�x.�''.3 weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed ts�rW�r�.c.a�h�*s'9°e ? � le al notice or advertisement;that said news a er has ��'°a°°?�dj°"�°'r��'s"`¢ S P P wv meelfna te eepn il s m am eda"re.uw �. � beea admitted to the United States mails as second class m.�em.co�wyco�� ` � matter vnder the provtsions of the Act of March 3,1879, �°om'�-��°S'^"'Pa"'°m°Na"a` tz ,ppuc,ubp newnee•tiy rrm�+n.ctie.`. or any amendments thereof,and that said newspaper is a �ra�+,uo4;ia�xs�a nr�+��d�'t a weekl news a er dul aalified for ublishin le��l �°'"'a"'PP�°"d6o-`°"'�"""��ry" �j Y P P Y 9 P P> b aw�.n,e vro�u�a,c.w n.:5 notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laivs „Msh�=T%±a+.��"m°�"•�o"Op1O� � of the State of Culorado. �ed�`��R�� :uoos t4 n mtz4rowwldv esouu�Rr�e 87 : v�Wnt d�6e 61h PJA.�Foi furWV Ido�mYM� � � toat�cl 8ilan MeNNlli��t the bpeo/P�Wa-� �. , That the annexed le�al noHce or advertisement was pub- ?eo�w�ioew��o�v.��; k lished in the re ar and entire issue of eve number of ' `��'�� ` 8� lY c�rew�amc.wmyc�.�w�+•; � said weekly newspaper for the period of�_consecu- r?� wur.twmm��n��+��r'; i'. tive insertions;and that the first ublication of sail notice �€�'y�`'�""� `-'"`� �'�'� � t� �w s m the issue of said newspaper dated ~— 3 �_A.D.,I9�_ and that the]ast pub- �t lication o said notice was in the issue of said newspaper "' ,� � dated�ll�_A.D.,14�'�. �{t • ___ — a� �. ' � _ .._ r . . . � . . k�. . ` Subscrib d and sworn to before me, a notary public in a id for the County of itkin,State of Colorado, on this�_day of A.D.,19_�,�. � . . . .. . i..�-. �� Notary Public ' � My rnmmission expires Q��' - • o c : . -; ti�.. : s:. ,• . �: .., '� � � �•.�� { � Qi � . �}J.! . v S� � � . . . . . . . � . . � !)a�' . L'.; �5 • . . _ -. _ - . � �ip�.t y}�. , S � ' :� �,... • , .,.�.`r.��fa�3�s?rr:Ri�w°.'iwa�l7Sa.�w'��.r.✓.,w�'u--,�;.[:wvu` �,::3�Lk"u4.v.,o48�3wi.r�ac:�''=u.0 ..."'— __""--w•:� . � � * i' t f. ". �4 � . . � � . . tr- . I �t .i ... . . J .. 1 � - ,,� :..:• _ �. . _� — - . -r - - � �_.-�- • . , .:. ' • � _ . �� _ ,:�. - � ;,*.�! ' �� 'r.��k��a�'cv..:T..�, r� �.. ' � ` � "'•�`�° • . •Ai . _ 5rfff.�F9;^K�°�+.''3su5sl,'Wtti+S�IIH s�l�is:$„bd�s3Gry.,'+tfi•r..� CT` *;, rN��rb f7... l l`4: � �.-''i' ' � �.. �X : �,i . �, �� 1 '- � � �A�. hi �� - . �� , .. T� �� . �� . . . '�.,.' ... � . - QOX r �� : � .-�'� Aspen,Coh�rac(c� ;. �3, . 5� . . �.r .� � PROOr Or PU!;LIC�TION ` ��t�,y � � r ,.: STATE OF COLORADO) r . _, � )ss. Copy of IVotice y � F 1.. Y County of Pitkin ) ��" . +x I,Andy Stone,do solemnly swear that J am the Iiditor In Chief of THB ASPEN TIMES:that the same is a weekly e'; newspaPer printed,ln,whole orin part,nnd puGlished tn the County of Pitkin,State of Cotorado,�nd has a genenl �'�s+� �•: - circulation therein;that said newspaper has been pub- �,z ��NO� t•� �� #.PLL�S¢-T�ICE NOTICE 7Aat the Boud d; � lished rnnt3nuously and uninlerru ptedl y in snid Counl y Countq Comm��+bne�+ol P11tln,Coo�y . a E Pit k ity for a eriod oE more than(ift -tcvo rnnsecutive iCa1ori�'��""4"�"eee°°p °�e a 6°�`� �' p . S� I895,Ti(tc rdutyrnutleed pub4ahe�ilnt weeks next prior to the t3rst publ3callon of lhe annexcd �n��gol.��;lai� ; legal notice or adverlisemenl;[hat said newspaper hns ii,:..ax�a�w,.General;5ubml�s�onKanAf_ ; been admiited to the Utiited States mails as second class �+�.uou w,u�.,;v«ua q.�vner;wn�ns ,j; � pursu_t.to Tltk 2/�rUcle 68 Colof+do - �� matter under the provtsions of the Act af March 3,7879, ��w= ` � ;, T 7t"�leNetteJu�n:�DepubCaMY.Qe'I[ � - or any amendments lhereof,and that said newspaper is a �''v�wwwba iAnK�n�.�.�.y»,�� ` a weekly�ewspaper duly quafifed for publishing le��l �� ,:.� _ _ '-"'�'' �- " notices and advectisements wIth!he meaning of lhc laws of the State of Colorado. � �; That the annexed legai notice or advertisemenl was pub- lished in thc regular and entire issue of every number of - said weeWy newspaper for F(ie period of,�_consecu- tive insertions;and that the Hrst publicaUon of said nolice w� In Hte issue of said newspaper dated ; dC4b�;�3 A.D.,19 �� end lhat lhe last Pob- ,a lication o�said notite was in the 3ssue ol said newspaper ; dated aW�. �� A.D.,14�_. �; �; . . .. . . . f: . '�.; � ..� . � - . . ei} . .�._. � . .. � � � '�� . . . � . . . .. . . . . ,�w`�; .. Subscribe and sworn to before me, a nolary �; public in a d for the Coun[y of Pftktn,Slale of Color�cto, on thfs �S day of A.D.,]9�t�. ;', ; _ . � Notary Publ c �..e My commission expires Q�� ; ` 7 . . . '' .. . . . . . a;i' � .. � . . i� `M. � rFv .' .. . . - ca i cD — � � . . �', ,�-: � . i ;� � . . � . � . - . � :. . . .`�"�' �.� . � �. �. . '_J ..�'. . � � � � . � �� E� � , � ' �,' ' $, 1�,' , � ��s4..�'�''m'id�=a"z45't?�ii:��6s�b'r`c�it'�fsi:�'i�.`��Gr�+�,�:tri�'rc�.,a�:}e„�,rsa.s.r=•-:^�w=�-w.::e:;-ez. W�a,....., ......_ — -- � - �� _ '. ; � � y'.�, a 4 . f ��; �'' J � `' r . � , . . . . . , . -- ; , , , , , _. , � 1 � r. �i� 1.- . r __. .� �:• . . . - ..r -- - __ � _ . . .: __, , _, ` -: _; / �. �; _ . . ,. . , _.. ,�'�n • . ,.,,. . ' � • . . •i.H ., _:.��?t�ZA:�'?iy�°.'N.�9k`rit:�`.8: �� `'�'� . dr.r'� w.._.z_��+�`b�i��tq�'��''ii.1�75il171+"vA'�I9,S�� *C^•:;,;., b i?k!.. -�'Vl.� ___. ._._ ______._._ (� , � • g.. � :1. _�� ,'+� .r. ; P��t Tz�t�s �: �:� ,.� � �s � � . _ �.�:.:., , - BoxE �r;:. -_.� ' Aspen,Colorado ��!',��.'� PROOF OF PUBLICATION � '' ;: _-�.:� � --- -- STATE OF COLORADO) r ,.: )ss. Copy of Notice � . 5..:-..�'... . . . �}:C�✓;�'�• County of Pitkin ) ,� I,A�rdy State,do solemnly swear Ihat I am the�ditor � S . in Chtef of THE ASPEN TIMES:that the same is a weekly • �yt newspaper pdnted,3n,whole or in part,and published in C ' . the County of Pitkin,State of Colorado,and has a general - - ��, • circulaHon therein;that said newspaper has been pub- ;��NO�su��`MUSi�a�'= lished mntinuousl and uninterru tedl m said Count HFREBY GIVEN lhal�Pu611.:he ma��u!K5 � Y P Y Y ��m o�w�aM,a.r o��.sy�ssstiu Rr� of Pitkin,for a period of more than�fty-two consecutive `�i..me�+s:ta n� �a�o'"'wn�'�O �n.;r � weeks next prior to the Crst publication of the annexed �^��Y�°""""'�°"`!'om�c�•� � 'room,Sb6 E,tAaln Sl A�pen t6 cemld r�n? � legal notice or advertisement;that said newspaper has .vv�� e�ni�q'�;cu. wu�,n�a; -�ai wu.a xe�n� m c��sunmu.kn; � been admitted to the United States mails as second class ,+aw ��o'<�+•u ��oM h�N��k' matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3,1879, `°'""odcarpofad"` � �c �( resWence,rd to aublls6 m M�wry.: or an amendments thereof,and that said news a er is a `b�i i e��•p�ow� ��«�« o .rpe. y P P rPraa•er u wruw ��sovnrc�s«a; a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal ::«,sa wm:�ne uu� Elk'Creek 5�dlNNOn,. � ':andtidav�tiW atac�.nl�WMm5Mwn4.; nolices and advertisements with the meanin of.the laws �:r 9Snu1h RaoCe�+Wm�01��e 6iA-� of the State oE Colorado. g `PM�wF`�j""'„'w°`�.tl�`�e.�nu�wd�� '�`t UetAsP��tln Cammunlb DevdoP��i. - .�peprtmmt910SOfi1- -s L� .., . � � �� eM1�.teFuetC(mw�4:� ; That the annexed legal noNce or advertisement was pub- > r cn.re�amcwmr��++ � ..� Wblbhed 1�.'Ibn NP�77mn Novemba 1�t lished in the regulaz and entire issue of evety number of ,ly� .�. ,:.- . ,. xa.r�" '€ said weekly newspaper for the period of�_consecu- "' : tive insedions;and that the first publication of said notice _ �w s in the issue of said newspaper dated ; A.D.,19�J and that the last pub- ; lication sa�d notice was in the issue of said newspaper `, � dated_�_A.b.,19 � . ri� . �. � E , k I. ' . . . � � . �S. . ' - Subscrib and sworn to before me, a notary public in an for the Co nly of itkin,State of Colorado, j � on Ehis$_day of A.D.,19�' . _, � � ,'�� ' � . Notary Pu lic '" � a My commission ezpires Q�� .�' i' � � . ' �u��` . �� .;. � i .� . �' c' �C� p . � , . _ . . . - . . . . C� � W � � � �, � � . 1 ,:�� . � . . . . 1\ / . k t i V . �Y� � i ; � �� {; <.�' �c.;.: ' � 1 , ' �F %� a,,�+ '��:''�t�+a3'sfir�:;h�.�tC,.r-•,vsnix�r,�'+'xu.d.s`:��_-7 .�..at-tt��:. u.,.,.a.s:,a:a....Sm..:<.}" " "'�� ' .� . ��r� {. . . ' _ . . . ' ' r �' . . �. . `, � ! ` �J " -.1 . .. � . � . . '`� c?�. : -, .. � . .. , . . _ 1 .\ . �I ' . . . � � 7 1.:1�' � � - . � . 1 �� . . .. 1 � ' . _ ..i.�' ... . l' _ . .. . . ' . " , . _ .' , . `� . � � , � ... � ' . . . �.� � . . �.. ., , . �.�. � . ?.�:� ._ � . . � ��. �s ^�-�.i.�'�C��.U�'G+M '�,-�i��;�.�rx'r �: vk�: ,� .�•9 _ :�J,h"i,cr:�..st'�^,iz�1i'dff.'tl7�ti'aFA;&�#5?'si:`�i�'Tail'Ar��'f r�m � ( 'i..�� '�f��`; . ,j . . . � �� . . � T�� As�� fi N T�� ,�; �� . M, - �o;��s �, -: . ;� � Aspen,Colurado � ;;'�� (+i�'� � ; I'ROOr Or PUl3LICATION �-;, _� t��+" . . ��'i! . �4... STATfi OP COLORADO) � r.' )ss. Copy vt Notice �` '° ; .,,.�.,�: < Coimty of Pitkin ) � i;; ; -�� I,Artdy StortF,do solemnly swear Il�at 1 am U�e Gclilor in Chtef of T2iE ASPEN TIMES:tltal!he same is a weekly '` � hewspaper pdnted,in,whole or in purt,nnd publlshed in �,* the Counly of P![kin,State o[Colorado,nnd has a gencral �;,�, circulaUon there(n;thaf said newspaper has been puU- � r - liehed conl(nuoasly and unintecruptedly in snid Cocudy .. of PItWn,for a pedad of more than 6tty-two rnnsecntive 1 � �}, �„r.��,� �x��.,��„;�,�;�,�,�,�.�„; .. weeks next rlor to lhe(irst ublicatton o[lhe a�utexed ` '' n'�.` ' �w-��,Ti'�c�^-""^ez3'b',�,. le al nolice or adverlisemenl that said news a cr h�s�� N07� ��*� ' ��`��N�"� �� 8 P k� n.F.�s€T,ui"enonce.rn,im�eo,re �: � '�"��'�YAqslos�.�,,.< {.� Couq! PIIItIn C m � Capla ol.lhe foll taU•afstAe OtdMU ce:u � been admllled lo the United Stales mails as sccond class,. r c mmlauonen e;_ ,,,y. ,.,u,nwi;,P„ak i,,,�i,,,e n e�y. , ��w1°�Q°�� otHCe houri Ia the /tice�ol lp Cle k and -� �; matter under t6e provisions of Uie Acl of M�rch 3 1879,��Mc duly+wtked'pu611cKwi�y;. Recarda;;530EM InSt'Mpen C lurdo ` ' or anq amendmenle lhereof,and lhat sald newspaper�s�`;;. fo°%""ogOrd1n'"`� s�bu e�mssms�ea oauwuicEdFnaeaieri.oFCOUrrtv ;, a weekly newspaper duly qualifled[or publishing legi!.`. coa►+nsioNmsosrmor+caxriv,..� : 'i�n��.;"omwrc�'ra�c �CU�DRADO CR(�NIWOARF7.OW1160FTIffi.�- PubMhedbT4eAt0�'IlelomDee.141995. � noUces and adverlisemenls willi l�e meaning o[ll�c la�vs_ �_,;;,y�:.� � �_,:._s„„�;;,,,.. � of the Slate of Colorado. ��J�� ? ?� lhat lhe annexed legal nolice or advetlisemenl was yub- � llshed in lhe regular and enlire issue o[ev ry numbcr of _ sald weekly news�aper for Uie period of�consecu- tive insettions;attd that the[irst publicalion of said noUce w in the Issue af said newspaper dnted , � . (o A.D.,19�� and that lhe Izsl pub- . 11cat[on f said noUce was in(he issue of said newspaper dat d��(p_A.D.,19�_. � . �' � ' —> 1 Subscrib aiid sworn to be[ore tne, � nolnry "' ' - public in a d[ar lhe County o(Pilkin,St�te of Colorncta, � on lhia � day of .D.,19 Q�_. . NolatyPubli , My comm(ssion expires Q—Q q.g' - . ; . . - . ��Y. .:..i . . . , � . W:.. . . . � .�. ...� � . . � +> ,�:: i.'� . � . �� : � C ti;�� . � i. . ' � (, GG7 I �, � 1 : `' • ' � � ' � tt � ,�k ` ;, � �:' lnn^` , � ` ii ....... i� ��'44u��"�^'�'°'_ _, �aw?!�avN.c�laW"±+r.c�4uWl�J�rd-�11rk44'F�•Stiiii�k.Y�kd�t3e!An '"'r'Y'°:.i4,'a+w:;oFUid'wy,�:�:w�s:ba47.w."'°'sa...-•.-..—„'—` —.``:� t .. . � . : . � {. . yl .;'..,. , y �• � K , � . "` �_,. � . • . �. i i.1A . .. . . . � . ' . - . . .. .. �. .- '.. . �- . . . . .. �; -- --- - r __ . r ' r,�'�gr`,°- . ' .e�.. . . . �. ' . . ti...�__ -._. _ ._ . __. _��..�..w__ ��_.� __� __ � ��:�s!i":"�.��:��'�..�t�:.S.3'4ii:��:�.1sA.1 �;. •��' � . .rf�-.".�'. .�e;:;-w"...��1� _. . �f��(rj:, • . - . _...__._ . �7 -�:_ ��: ' ��i . 1�t �: ' :��;�;� T �t� AsP�N Tt�� _�:�:� � � k `:;, , ' BoxE �`; �';i:,., Aspen,Coloracb c PROOF OF PUBLICATION � $.�.� ,`: :�::�:. ; - — STATE OF COLORADO) � )ss. • Copy of Nolice� � '� . . . .. .Y.:,...;:... : �. . i'� �::.��. , - County of Pitkin ) I,Andy Stose,dn solemnly swear that I am the Gdilor ' `�' , in Chief of THE ASPGN TIMES:that the same is a weekly . newspaper printed,in,whole or in part,and published in `r the County oE Pitkin,State of Colorado,and has a general "� ` � circulation therein;fhat said newspaPer has becn pub- ;y: lished continuously and uninterruptedty in said Counly •�N�� '• of Pitkin,for a eriod of more than Hft -two mnsecutive iai x,�uxo nev�w•e�n¢a+wc.�ancpa) P Y xexEer mvEritn.�a w�cnn. wm nc; ri weeks next prior to the first publication of!he annraced �aeoow�.a.xr,oaoaw�e;�s�x...�z � legal notice or advertisement;that said newspaper has �a��„"i.,b��,°°�°"�,,,,�'°N�? `� been admitted to the United States mails as second class �"^m`��M�"`� k�"�'��"i - .yipllnlbo,wtimRfed bl ScalrB�IS�b and p � matter under the mvisions of the Act of March 3,1879, a�w skoe�.oa�uoi:►at�.=.:a':+ or an amendmen st thereof,and lhat said netivs � er is a �""°"'PP'°"r'"�ao°�0O"°d1O�'� . y P�P i;:o:.m.mn,+o,ae w.od.,nb.ppa�.m,�.� a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal '+�.o�.«!!w�o+kw.+u�i��;'� e�:+�c nKn�a�m�.ewea.�o ur�nn d; notices and advertisements with the meaning of Ihe laws �n�s�cad,a„o,.oea uKp�r xp�x of the State of Co?arado. �m"'$°`�`u°'°�'T°""°hpeso'"a Pvl(a89Wmdt1ie6thPMPorWMvinlor—"� . satloa eootacl EII Suswc t IM1 � Atpa�(Phdn ComwW4 DevaioP!nml DeP�t i That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was pub- ��amya , � . - lished in the regular and entire issue of every number of _� y�,�,��,�-:� said weekly newspaper for the period of�_consecu- i��bTh.�+w��+��.,,,,� tive insertions;and that the Crst publication oE said notice .�,�,_:- _ ' � x''� I �wa in the issue of said newspaper dated i! �_A.D.,19�_ and that the last pub- tication said notice was in the issue of said newspaper • dated�_A.D.,19�'�_. i . f y� ' _ . . . � . .. —-:�.- � • � . . � � . � . � . .. - . - . Subscrib and sworn to before me, a notary � public in a d for the County of itkin,State of Colonclo, y, i on this day of A.D.,19 qs Notary Publ c � My commission expires �_"�� i ,; :, ... : ; ' ' � �.4. � Z . . �; :*��. ��• ; �.. � ' � � : '�`� . l, 1, ^�X . . �•. ti i . . . . � � v' . ,,CO• •_L�,Q� ' � . \ v 1 � � ' ..�� . . . � � . �� ` .. . . s ... .i¢��:5�v:.t�µw..X�?..i 3l / <c«.•.w.r'�c+•+�' `.w,LGb.�ix2'v:�i7c'i.*.'«.:+2i:cwo«�fiW-`3ii�„�vi-^-.�....c .. . � �i��`� . . . . . i . Y��. ' � ' . . �: . . . �� •� ` � ' � .. . . . . . , .. , . ' " .'.�. :..'.,,� �. ... . . ..., � . . ..,. . .-:._ . �. :F,. -� . - � ` . .�. . ... : � . . � :�. :�. _,_,`: . o�. _� . � .: .` . �'. . 1 t . . .. . . ' _ .. ., . � . .- .: .— - _ .. . !_ . . . . . ' . . ' _ _ � r . . .. . . �rt .. . . . . . .. , .. . - ., • . i�� _ , - � � . . '��1 M�ta��'�:;�+.."„�r, -�; �,� . " , � . . . , ..r..i . '°�c....- 4 .. -�'=-.:� �.a..:^dF' . ._. i;.{ifa!;a.-ra:R!�i'i-c!c�ai.'LZ�s.Yxatr.,r.....,...�„.__�...... �� r { �.s. . L�+ ��`4;7;:. i`� ' �sk _. s ��' Ttt��s .� T�t� A P . , �� .. - .; Box E . " �`� =i Aspen,Colurado r�i,';�� ; y:;;� — � �z � : � PROOF OF PUBLICATION 4;, -— _'.,�� STATE OF COLORADO) � )ss. Copy of Notice � `!' 1 '_;�:.',, County of Pitkin ) � � � I,Audy Staie,do solemnly swear that I am the Editor � in ChIef of THE ASPEN TIMES:that the same is a weeWy r .; newspaper printed,in,whole or in part,and published in w � the County of Pitkin,State of Cobrado,and has a general _- . �eueuci+ona �< 2 ` � circulafion therein;that said news a er has been LLb- PLEASE'TAKE NOTICE ThN tM 0aard of ! � P P P �"p�MyCpmmWbMflo,IPIl41nCWMy CoM•' ¢ .:C.: lished continuously and uninterruptedly in said County o�ao,,.w�owa�umiocwn�aa�mn�n�; � of Pltkin,for a eriod of more than fif two consecutive �0 p°"(°"'tO°"�1°tlK« �'"condiG ' P �3'' a ew�ne..�u�r� .i m�eo.'c..<wtv�� weeks next prior to the first publlcation of the annexed �w��i��"�"""'' �'� ty Covrthouse:DbMct Counroom.`506 Eul � �, legal notice or advertisement;that said newspaper has wuo�.Ke,�,v�:c�,aomeu:�u��- F . g been admitEed to the United States mails as second class o��'°��a"�`�o,wo ` � � ' matter nnder the provisions of the Act of Macch 3,1879, a'-��° ��:I or atty amendments thereof,and that said newspaper es a �m�ronneta�� a weekiy newspaper duly quaiified for publishing legal ``�u�e,��;mb;;,e w�,.m sc�Pe�oo ' noflces and advertisements with the meanin OE N1C IdWS ��DakeC Mve�pPXctl�°P�o"' s .COUnry 10:requnl remntnf W twn�tl��ent ��. . of the State of Colorado. .�w�ya�xiowa�wnr.�ws� s+w,a�srcaw.e mes�"`�'w�G io t�he ,xt;7wnsA1P 8 SmRh Ran{e � : That the annexed le al notice or advertisement was ub- �d,��^ecwa�a.wWasm eescm- ; '�a, B P �r w�v+u�r,� xai�b,'a�`sw�e m� • , lished in the regular and entire issue of every number of �w�ti+«�= ..3:The Pltkin CwntY PVnaiat�nG Zoak6 : . � . said weekly newspaper for the geriod of�_consecu- co:;mww„,�v�.�a rw.poua�oa auy � tive insertions;and that the first publication of said notice w 14'� ��'��°°�°`•°'��°°°� � � �w s in the issue of said newspaper dated �en.�a�atnn aWd!b�u+.�-' oZ.`� A.D.,19 q and that lhe tast ub- �"r1idi1ed jxiOMC""`�°°°9°LaDb�"' �._ P ls9s.�cvh�wi..n�am:..•m•a�u,e ub � lication f sa�d notice was in the issue of said newsPapec rexo9�n{w In iompll�nn w1N ippUeWle : , da ed C)l�, ' �_. �,mau,ecaaicn�ena. . " .J� A.D.,14 Q � r+ow n��son�;.ee tr ortn,�wen br u,� - eo:�a a cownr co�mmw�,:d ruu�c�: ` �. � . [%CObrWo.Nr.p_6erabrYPPl�+a+^�' : _ orcntmthePXida.lbuop� M�tMrao°': lbuop� � .+_ .roy+Mwbhicivrhpat!es��o7yK . .. Coaes M the ddt�Wt ol We OrtlM�aa ue t• - •avJlabtelarpu6tle�lma&]Oamm - � . .�. �4:80 p.m. tAe O[Ic 1 the.CI rk�nd '� . .Rnnrdcr Mdn4ueetNP!?,YCOIaMo �'� ' k 8�6,,:��. , ,-; Subscr�be and sworn to before me, a notary ��«°��ry°�°�`, ", ' public in an for the Co nt of itkin,State oF Colorado, �- - - ---- -- ------ on this ��_day of A.1�.,19�_. ' . �.II( ; , Notary Pu lic „ � „_ s q , v�,"�^� My rnmmission expires�e'� . ` � ' . >�,,'' . - - -o-- � . A. .`1`},� t, ' . . K' . ' �l �:: ( _ . . . ..� .. � . . : . , :';�4 . IVU+�. ��t. � � �,-..,..�.:<,:.,.,- —.,-..,.�.-,...�-at,a.. - i:e�.wa::. ...��:s:.a.�:�.,...:_�-----._--. --,g � . . . _ '. .. . _ " . � ��.. t . , . .. . . � '1. -�; . . .. ' � j � J - • ' . . . '� ' �. . . �i- ..,.,.; .. , .. �. _ . � . . -_ . . i ' ' - . . -- -_ � _ , .: ,._ .__. . - � :. . - . -�'.�.,�: . _ ' „�„�,�e _ . �'. ��,J- .:�p-..i..�l�At�.. :Q s.. .. .... .. ._ . . . � � i . . � . . . ^ . 1 . ._ ... . _. .. . _... � . n^Y.��;�w,( �J� . , � . �"'p'SY`,r , �� ^ . � � . � , �i T �, rR, �� sP�� Ti � � � ; :�. >� uo:��: �� - . �,>.-: _-�''t , Aspen,Coloihdo �.'.,,�.��. � �: � . ,:� � � PROOr or��u�Llcn�loN . � ;: y::°= � � _ STATE UF COLORADO) � ��`- ; _ )ss. Copy o[Nvlice '�'`" ��,.--'. . � : Count,y of Pitkin ) •�,:z-. i : -r,;;, •-`�,.. I,Andy S(u�rc,do solemnly swear Ihal 1 nm ll�e Iidilor �-`�'�� in Chlef of 1T�8 ASPEN TIMES:lhal lhe same is a weckly newspaper prinled,ity whole or in pad,nnd puUltshed in ;-�;.�` !he County of Pilkin,State of Colorado,nnd has a geneml drealallon thereln;that sald newspaper has been pub- � lished conllauously and unlnterr�ptedly in s�id Cowrty _ .� ; of Pllkin,for a pedod of more pian[ifty-two wnseculive Mr P�E r�ice�nc�n i i6e auara w.' weelcs next Qrlor to the Eirsl publication of lhe annexed je��iyFc mmiaafoneii of Pltkln Cou�y,` � le�al noHce or advertisemenh,that said newsp�per I�as cow,.m.nw,�i.:��Q s� been admitled to the Untted Stales mails as semnd ciass "��""�n°` °"i'`"°""°°'i"°�°° aa�Ea iPK ra�a.n�Qa,ai�cc � maQer under the provisions o[llie Act o[March 3,]879, ' b1D1�'�EOVT"Er�+couwrv�o�ko y� Rt e4��ccbcouKrr.`•M �am��Er�co�e a�n�s:' �: or any amendmenls thereof,and that said newsp�per is a am eRa� a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing Icgal '�'�c nia��a��'m aau�� .,�;' + noQces and adverqsements wflh 4Me meanin o[lhc laws r fu6i fw p bMc In'ipectl n d rMp maular F � S r ltice h-a In tb Iliee ol tl CI rk nd.; � o(the Stale of Colorado. �+� �d i.SJO E MHn Sl n,� cao a . _ . e�a��a� mtams�ea �,,, } . � -i��e� 'e,.o�owr��yck,k�: \�' _ ThaE lhe annexed legai nolice or advedisemenl was pab- Pu40,°edNi,T1iPip°'`�'°"'aiDe16""'s';3 � Iislied ln the reg��laz and enlite issue o[eve y numbcr o( ` said weeh.ly newspaper for the period o( � consecu- � llve insections;and that the[trst publicalion oF said notice j �w (n the issue of said newspaper dated 'L. b_ A.D.,19 a�—' and t6at lhe last pub- i - . !!ca(lon of sald notice was in the lsstte o[snid newsp�per da ed \ � b A.D.,19 q . . -� �_ � � � C___�' ] Subs rib d and sworn lo before me,'a nol�ry public ln a d[or Ihe Ca nly of PiIWn,Slalc o(Co{ondo, , , on ihis day o A.D.,19�j' . ;! • W� ' i f. � ii :�,I Nolary Pub ic , Mycamtnlssionexpires �Q'�.g" �j .. x . . _ .. . . � e: � � ' J /, � . � � .. � . .� � ; ,., �r � � � , :z ,. ' ,� :+�>� n`•, �Y ',� : 1 :1� ,y�ti1-„! ' {, a� � �f'- � �ii � ,. ;`�. . , _ . _ , .. . .s .e�-:+' � ..`_^...,-.-�,..nr.:ii.::ky;'_-.,,,rs,.r;�e'un�..4t�&�!i.[:u�J'sL..'�:74%6s�G2P+m.z.�`:w.,°w�v-n,U_..,.,, . .s.,.,, a.�. ( . / , . . . '. ,,_ ,�tr , , < �: � � � ' � . ��- � �. � J ; . �. ' ti � � � 4%: .l ; _ ',tr�"" �; / , _ - , r t�,Ya�r,'t - : ' :�-.�• " ;� � � . �a', ,, y�;y�� .. ` � . .. � ' ::+��"�xACS z.�..��X'_�C�`.•: _.. :I�N-'- i3.4�� ,..�+78' _. _... ��d(d�J:�'dNk.ir�`t`�'fl4d�a'�ysau«v,°nn°atsm,er�w.s�,,...x.�a�d� !"'° . 'f°^.y�AA-�tin' • ^` �l. V �+ � T�� ' � Y� s��s 7��. .�� '-. .` ' ,�' "i . .t��; . � . . - � - -). . _. .c� . QO!C Ti . � , .�,,. , . ' Aspen,Co!c>raclo .';r:. '� : '� i,. PROOi�Or PUI�L,?.Cl1TION ` ' r < ,:: s STATE OF COLORADO) �`,�, �� ' )ss. Copy of Notice . ;�.-':"s'. � � . .. � � . . • - � ::!`":t.��'"�'� County of Pitkin ) r� � - ti s, I,At�dy 5toae,do solemnly swear thal I am[he iidiiur �`: . 3n Chief of THE ASPEN TIMES:fhat l6e same is a weekfy g. ' newspaper printed,in,whole or in part,nnd published In Ihe Connty of Pltkin,State of Colorado,nnd has a gcnerai t��e�,.�,�:X�,��k?��,�'"z, �: circulation therein;Ihat said news a er has been tlIl- 3fiPLPA4E:TAiCEN077CE?Th Lthe9ouQof'""'� lished continuousl and unfnterru tedl Sn said Co�nt couneY cdmm�nro�r,>6l,rnuo coyary �a "�, ' Y P Y Y calo�.ao,nw.� �w`o�n�c�e�, oE Pitkln,for a pedod of more than fifty-two cviuendive 1995 dte'a auly-oticed p hllc heYrleg� t$ ■�IIEG�}hQ/p�1p1�IOQRtlOWtl00 h�l�S�' .• teeal nofice or advert sement tha�t sa d ne sc�ncr hrs ��a��,"'°`d�"�°"'""�"'"°`°'°°'i'"'°°'ba Y 8 (��P «w�.ve,�a rmvaa�v�.�e e�"nu� ' ,, been admilted to the Uni[ed Stales mails as second class zti�•44�^�°�S�.r�-.,e� = � '1 V' h'anctlaJon3.0eP�Y��WQCts � _ malter under lhe provisions of the Act o[Marcti 3,1874, ��+amnK�.nm'�.�ws,�7qa� ;j or any amendments lhereof,and lhat said newspaper is a 1� "'�' �"'•a'�:�_ a weeMy newspaper duly qualiGed fot pnblishing legal � notices and adverlisements wilh lhe meaning o[lhc laws � of the State of Colozado. Thaf lhe annexed legal notice or adverti.emenl wan pab- lished in the regular and entire issue of every nccmtmr u( said weekly newspaper for the period o[_�consecu- � tive insertions;and that the Cast publicalfon of said nalice w,a�, in the issue of said newspaper daled dCAl1• �3 A.D.,19�= and that lhc last pub- ' lication�aid notice was in the issue of said newspaper, � da ed , l3 A.D.,19�t,�=. � .. '.'�,� � �� t - ^ � y, SuUscribe and sworn to before mc, a notarp > - public in an [or the Cou�of Pitkin,Slaie o[Colorado, ?: on thts,�_day of A.D.,]9��. �; ,�• Notary Publ c � • s My commission expires�� . �k .;; :r) ','aYL �� .. . .fl. �`� %i • . . � . � . . � �v -"'A 1 �� + C' � �, � A D � � :� r' 4 � l: ,�.. �► � �;. � � �;�: •:CO-..A.,�� I+` ......,., �. I ,� k . , �f,.-�c&w..�..u'rt.s:�.;,t;:�.c..c..s,�x.r-•' - — .,.�;�� / { � - - ��. �� '�- � . '- .: . . .. , . , . : _�" . . _ ' � G� - r � ,;' � J 'i � � t . . , - � • . � � - ` c' . i � -'�, 1 :1- � � �F�f. � . R , ; , ,_ , - _ . r... „ ,: - , `_ . .� .. _ : __, ._ ... _ . ,: r�: . _....' . � , �� ' _ , ��. "