The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.min.reg.02111985 �� « � AY �;�� , , , '='�'�. ��. � =;r *�� >� �-; s . "�.�� e�_�-es i-� '5.�s..:. . � �`a�.. Lc �: t:.. i��.- . ,. . . . ... �� . _ _ . .... .y _ ..�°.-," HOA[iD OE' COUNTY COMH255tON�It5 AGENbA 11 FEBitUARY. 1995 AONINISTRATION �:AA �.m. R�u�l��i�n� �nd C�ntr�et� Ninut�u --— — - tUC Am�nd: �uppl�rn�nt ,ix C�rr��ti�ng = A1�n Ricivn�n, Pi�nning ; Ann�s�l C�r�ifi�atidn nf Chang�� in Ro�d Sy��m - �ud �ylar, - @U�lic Ntfrlt�s bir�e��Y M@mar�ndum of Und�rgtafldingc Sc��e L�nd Bsatd = 'Com Smith. ' County A��rngy ; 1985 Sln�t� ��mtly Mort�a�e R�venu� ��nd�: Noei�� of N�arfng - Tom 5mith 4 Herrh. 1�85 � 10eQ0 �.m. _ 9:25 WOOdy CC@@k T�V�Ffl Liquor Lte�n�e. Tr�nsf�r o� 6�+n�rahip - ; Rtm Nhit�nt�na, D�pu�y Cauney Cierk ,;� - ' �:�0 Pubile 1ia�ring ConEinued - Pltcg Coa@ Amande Alc Po1luEion ' Regulaeion�. 'OE[saE" Varianea - La� Cassin. �nvlconmeneal ' It@aieh _ , LhND U8B ; ' 10+00 �ubiLc ttedrin� - t��xnar Lot S�liE - Cindy Nouben, Planning `;;.f (To b� �abl@d ro 25 Fabruary. 1885 � 10,�0 a.m.1 ' % 1Ar95 COE� �mplOy�� [A+�llifl� IIn�C Coh��ny�d - Cindy HOUb�n - - , � 30�3A Publie N�ering - Timee�thiAllisen RoaA Vac�Eion - Cindy ttaub�n � 10�A0 Burnt Moun�ain� R�scrlu��gn �ncloc�ing Nl�nning dfl� ZOfl111J - Commission Raspon�� kA U.S.F.S. - M�rk Fu�]�r. Envir�nm�nEal „�� - CAOCdina�or. :;`�_�'; 12�00 8.m. Publi� CoRm�nt 12�iS M��ting Adj�aurn�d • � i ! 'PU�SDI►Y. 1x F�BRItARY. 1985 -; � s - WORR a�SSIONS �_:_ �Tt ,�'. 4sP9 a.m. Q4�G Ob3�Gt�v�� jx;_- lO:OQ Discusaion of BOCC Hembership A�RC'��a%i' a:��,,,y' 1�:30 Gal.orada Counties, Inc. r_„�; �� .• a: �i � - ��:-: ��f �;�¢�. �� :��`" �;z " : .r,.�...F'�:��=i:. ...,_.._� _S - ,- .�.:. �„ ,.�.�,�,,.: v `� j f - � _ > � �_ '.�c '��r.[4t , e '� ,,,x ��' xi Y; h �� $. �, �=�k�Y ;��! }�.�, .. , �-`�' .'�. .t ,� `�,r b p �,, ]� ,. � '� .a_.+.ts w i6'a':;-.h y�'i„„3.+A�+a--'-.r.is_,��......�..,sJSi..:f.-�v::��, �K��-v�^-��`.�.�i�.:":.Y•... .. , rirRi�v conrrrr BOARD OP OOMM298ION6R8 i RRl'L1t Ai� NEFTfiNf' 11 RSBRLIARY. t 985 PR�BBNT: T!!O}IAS flLAR�, ROFIERT id d1ILD. NtCNAgt. E:I4lSLBY, GQORGE WtD3EtJ, N�LEfI KLA,'IAERUD ; �Nirtutea Thc rainutes oE 11 and 20 �ecvmber. 1984, and 2� January, 1905, res�ctivoly, Wore �eviewed and appcovod an submitted. �LUC Actf,n� Planning Directoc Alan RtcNaan introduced a cesolu- ' ` ,Naendc tlon m�aklns� a►inoc coc�ections to Rcsolutiona 5�-65 artd 83-98. The :Supp Planning OELico noeed, �u�ing the pccparation oE thQ efxth 'Six supplcmont to the Altkin County Code. lha� Ewo (2) pccvioua ; ;Co�coct coaolutions aaending the C.an� Use Codo �c�e pooclY draEted afld � ccquica�l �+ino� correctlAns. Rcao2ueton 67>9$. Aclopeed on x6 SepEeabQr. 19s�. aatablighad uaE011ite cFiohas es c� sp�eial ccviow uao in ai1 zone disCrietg and dclegato�] final rsviev authority to the Planning and zoning Canr..isaian. Thix use aas et�oncrously . ; assl��ed to aubsec��an J-3.47 gE thc �ode in thc use Tablc, �-_? baw�vcr, as this subsaction hacl alEOacly bag�► �leai9naEOd €oc ano�her user in additian. �be �coccclur� it��l� was a��igneci to Saction 4-b.l(g) of the eode, a subsee�iAn which �as A1CQStbf � dosignated far anothet proeedure. The rasalu�ion subwitted foc � �oac� r�view iaday vauld assign the satellite dish review ; procedure ko S�ckian 6-6.1(�I of Che Cad� anci the uss co sub- . s�eEfa� 3-3.59 qf the use Tahl�. ' Reaolucion 84-65, adop�ed on 23 July, 1984, removed fcam the Pl�nnin9 and zoning Coau�ission ahd delegaked to the 9oard final aut�hority for the review o� applications subaitked within the conkexk o� khe Emp]oyee [xaellin9 una� cegulations. The ameodueent to Section 3-8.13, while delegatin9 such au�ho[ity to the eoa�d, failed ko remove the reviex procedare fcom the, Commission. The [�solukion submitted for Board revies+ coday would C�peal Section 6-6.1(fl of the Code in an ef�o�t to clarify the intent of khe - ariginal resolution. Richman explained that tne corrections vere very minoc in nature and that they were intended only to wrrect the intent of previous amendments, such so that kwo {2) readings - vould not be necessary. Y biadsen moved to approve the reso2ution, Klanderud secondea "-4k` ~ and the motion passed unanimously. i. ___-"----- if �_,.r,�_".�FleIDO County Attorney Tom Smith introduced a t•temocandum of +�'"��,; lt�nder- DndeLStanding to be enteced into between the Board and the State f. �'�: �.�!�._�Commissioner's lieeting 11 February, 2985 - 1 >,.,��.,<. �..�_r-.:_.,;s '�� 5,- , � _ �. -.:�., fi , }. ,:� ..3 t�.. t,� , . °,: _3*: ._ . {�. y �.`''' �'�� . .at�iS' *r s"i. s -t�& ��, ��- „ # - ... ....,_+r;.... ��3.. : ...�,;.r-..F..... _. a.... �a.._ . ..... 'ts6`a�w+at:.�*�' .�;......:.�' . . . stand: Boatd of Land Commissiohers. The Menorandn�, which vas requested S[ate and approved by the Land Use Comnfttee of Colo[ado Counties, Land inc., was forwacded to a21 counties for teview. Snith explained Comn th�t the (temotandum would provide for tAe fo2lowing: a. users oE land undec the jutfsdiction oE the Land Co.�missionets would be reqnited to conply with 2oca1 land use controls _ b. the �oatd aoula agt�e. prior to Yhc adoption of a nastiet plan, to aorY. aith tAe Land Comnisuioners on planninq and desiqn�t�d uses nndec the control of the Land Connisainnec� C. eh� Besard weu]d taY.r into aecnunt eh� nbligation �f the L�nd Cnnmfssiane�s ro ra�ximia+a ehe return on a�l trns� p�cc�ls ° Thg t�er�ncandu� wat� cevieWed by both thr Coanry AtEOCnpy and thr Planninq Office. and 5nith ra�or.im�ndecl apptoval a� �uc�irrea. PEadsen mov�d to au�horiza the ehnir eo execuce ehe Agreement Chlid C@CbfldQd �nd the motton pasged un�ntraoualy. 2985 Tam S�+leh in�coduced discuaalon on ehQ iaauance oE eh@ tiortgagQ County'a t985 allocatton ot Nortgago R@vanuQ Oonda. ThQ County RevQnuo recQivod an annua! allocaeion oE aald t�onda to Einance realdnn- Aonda Eial houaSng facilitien for lo�+ ond mtd�1Q lneo�ao f�ml3iQa, and !ha Couo�y has, during the paot sscvera2 yetara, aaoignod ita ailoc�tion co anotho� county to provide Eor aa ag�rcqatc faauancc. Tho 19�3 alYocation, !oc instance. uaa tcanaferced to ►Ieaa Councy. the 19A, �ilocation to Ar�pahoe Councy, vhoroa� the 1985 allocation Woulc! be t�ansEecccd eo Adams County. Piekln Cou�ty's ailocation would be C�a�etFarrcd ko anothee covrtty sia�ply co peovide to� a single, large �ond issuancer the tran�Eer vould not isopardiza �hc 8ickin allocation, rathcr. chcac Funds wauld ati21 bo arAdo available �o asstse rasic)cncs i� eha purchaao ai cesic3eotial Eacilities arr noecd. • Adaw� county ha� Kcyua�tad thsE tha tsan��ar bo accomplishod pt1oE to �1 Match to allox toc a� issuance khis spc3ng. Rece�tly � adopted federal regulations require that A publsc Acacing be ache@ulad €or the transfcc and, given these nokiae caquiremants, a specia� aeeting must be rscheduled for +tonday, 4 Macch. 1985. The itea sras submitted today ta schedule the public hca�ing, At rhieh time the noard vould caensider the Aelegatian and Allqcatian Tca�nsf�c AgreemenCS. and the Policy Report undec sacti4n 103A of Ada�s Courtty. icinsley moved to schedule a public heasing foc Eronday. 4 Ma�cb. 1985 at lO:Op a.rr, ko consider khe Ecansf�r a� th� County's 1985 allocation o� t!artgage Revenue 8onds to Adams County. Child seconded and the motion passed unanimous2y. FJqody Depnty County Clerk Kim 4lhitestone introduced a liquor - - C[eek license application for the transfer of the tavern license issued Tavern to the S•toody Creek Tavern. The license, originally issued to Liquoi the partnership Arasz and Goidyn, would be transferred to partner License Daniel Goldy n as sole owner. Referral comneots were generally supportive, and FJhitestone recommended apnroval subject to the _ - c2earance of the app2icant's finge�prints by the Colocado Bureau - of Investigation, � � KinsZey moved to appcove the transfer subject to the (1) condition recommended by tahitestone, Klanderud seconc3ed and .�:..;::: = the motion passed unanimously. �` %'� Commissioner's Fleeting 11 February, 1985 - 2 -�.j' �,}w �.x`u .��: �-;,:...,� _ , _ �, - .. .y�,,,� . � �, . 3 � � � � 1 � _ � � .`��,�� '�3 � �'. � ' u�»� �#� , .. -g'F !�"�� x...� `��}, �� +.t� ��* . . .. . ... . . � ... `? ��S�'� ...�t..... . .`�'t „�1`-_ , . � �. .�� s� the noCion �assed unanimously. Publf.c The Eoacd continue8 thc public hearing on a pca sed t►earing anendnent to th� Air Pollution requlatfon� contafned withfn�the Con'r: Title Thtee (3) of thh Pitkfn County Codp, Ertvicohnene�l Health PitCO Officer tee Gassin sub�ftted eo tne record her nenorandun dated G ('bde E`ebCUaey, 1485, and the 1'f.kin County Ccde as a,aended to daCe. Atnend Cassin ex�iaCned that discussion an the �,�endarent, Whi�h uould Aic adopt a» "ofEaee" v�rianc;e, w�s continued froa� the ld Januaty P�llute n�crinq co pcovide foc the ad�pridn �E an enEocC�n�nt, payncnt. Reg's � intspco:ton anci Yiguici�red damage� proviaion, and t� pcovidg f�c Ct�e auto;a3tic e�tpiratinn �rf the �nendr�ent uiehin an �lqhee�n (181 nontti period, in adctfrian �d th��e rh�nge�, uhirH s+erp r�qu�sretl by the �t��cd, �1rc Cl��n ��tr ndvistrry �oacd Inittited �n� (1) dthct[ rM�nryQt rathet th�n (iC6V�dt3 foc thc� ��1e �f a �lreplaca and ehc raquicenent thae rhat Eic�plare b� ;,��de p�rca�nc�ntly innhhrablr, tnc Advi�nry Uoard recdnnon�ted eh�t non-eercified woodburninq dpviea�� rhe ric�bts tn whi�h wauld� be s�old to ano¢har party. stn�ly bQ [i+(ilaCQtl WieN a eerriEirB, ldw-crmin�iot►s devi�e. Cas�ss[n iotcndured a rQUOlution a�acnding Tieta tcr. section A-�.2, oE tNe Aic Pollueion Regulaeiona oE thc Pltktn Coun�y CodQ, by th4 �d�dleion oE a ncu subsecilon �coviding !or an "oflaet" vsct�rtee and soeting Eocth .1ao at�ndnrBs to bo rrot for such A varia�ca and enEorcemenc �►ccManl$cas Eor variancc permlea. , Thc reaolution uz►a ataendo8 subac.�ue�t+� to aecond ra�dlnq approval Eo inelude ehe Eollowing: an "ofEgeE", far inseanae. eould only ba achleved by ehe replaea�+ent af lawful� �re-oxiaring E[ceplt►cos a��d noncerti�icel aoot�stovna with crr�iEied, lou-�aisatons, solld Puel burntnq davlcers, �setntts for ail vari�neQts w�uld ba is�aued ; by the Advl�ocy t�aard. gvcuri�v and onforeQr��ne proviafons wcrQ includaci� rnd a liquidated daaagcs �rovt�lon ++an addod that �ould pcAViaQ fAr �enalcioo o( uP eo tt�rea hunclresl dallarB (5300) �or daf. Finally, the ar�cndAQnc waulcl auta�aeteally cxpire eightaon t�g) �onEhu trom i�s e��cetive clate. Casain cxplained " that the r�$o�utiors was sut�;nitte�l for mppcoval on thircl caaclirtg today �lao tQ the variou� chany�ac ice3Ciated sub�equant to r�ha IA aa�uary r�eeting. =� � nlake �hen �peneci Che t►earing for public cor�msnE. An unidantifiod indivlcival que�tianed the nosd �or a variance pcocadurer in the event such a procedure vas naoded, havevec, thc variAnce proposed v�s cnasiderad very beneficial. Kinsley fei� that the va�iance procedure Wou1d p�ovide thQ baeis for the eveneual adoption af more sk�ic�gent re9ulations. Blake a$ked fot additional cor�ae�ts; tbece being none, the hearing was closed. Chiid ooved to aopcove the resolution on third and final reading, Rins�ey seconded and the motion passed unanimously, �'.Annual Public s•lorks Director e�d Eylar introduced a resolution '`Certify submitting to the Co2ocado Departmenc of Righways a nap iodica- �ROad ting changes to the County system of roads up to necepber 31, ,'System 1984. The County must certify to the Aenattment, on an annual 'Change basis, the mileage of roads that were maintained by the County and were, therefore, e2igible £or Highway User Tax Funds. Eylar explained that appror,imately two hundred and thirty-five (235) ;�:y:='-'_;. miles of roads wece eligible for the Tax Funds, of which apptoxi- _ - mately nine and one half (9.5) miles represented subdivision ==�`'>�'= roads. The County would realize hetween approximately four �-"�:;:' hundred thousand ($400,000) an four hund�ed and sixty-nine :�,�..--i :i_�,,,�;�:, thoasand dollars (S4S9,000) in User Tax Funds based on the above ;��`�Commissioner's t�feeting 11 February, 1985 - 3 r�� e __ . -- __ � , � �-3.: .�t,�. . t ,.. j a . N . K �"i_3��Y'��..'°I•� 4-. (- . . �. �.... � . �rxa^�.�1<�'�Y+ 'yy--W x_w ,..� .;'1c'�3E.s-.�ru 6 1�+'k�.+�Y"�'�h4"S�iYic �� .�y�_3��`��c� � mi2eage. Kinsley noved to approve the t�solution and to ce[tify to the Depattment that tao hvndced and thirty-four and ninety-five one hundredths [234.9$) miles of toads weee eligible Por Uset Tax Punds as of 31 De�enber, 1984. Riandetud seconded and the notion passed unanfnoasly. Public Th� �oatd convened a public rieating to considec the t�t�xn�r tip�ring: Lot 5p1ft, p2anner Cinuy �touben aubmitt�t� Co ehe record the tt�exnet Pianning Office rn�mv of 11 �ebtuaty, I985, and the Lahd Use Ctld� Lot �� iaencfeci to �ate. fioub�n cxp2afned tnat, al�houqh Cwblic noCte� of edday's h�ating was pcoperly publishcd, �h� ad�ac�ne r�ropQ�ey �wner� w�ce pot pert�oh�lly noEiEi�d of rhe h�aeing �s eequired by eha Gndc, h� eh� �p�licarion Cou]cl n�e �e cc�ngi�ler�d pending �on�lt�nce WitN ehe nnci�icaeien h[ovisi�ns, �h� pla;►ning dPEiCe [��d7n�nd�sd ehat the �p�,licstian bre t�bl�ei and ehrz h�aring �c�neinuced unttl eh� cubsc�huene ;�eQainry. Dlaka chen o�sened the he�tin� �nr hubli� ea�aeent and ch�re va� none. :tlan�2erud �ovQCR eo tabic ehc applicacidn and te� eantinue thQ publie haacing on ttonday, �5 Pebcunry, 1995. a� 1a:3A a,m. Chlld acc�ndaci an�i thQ moti�n �nucd un�nir�oussly. Coea Cindy ltouben irttroducQd thQ CoE� ��loyoo �ollSng Unit F�aployeQ ap�!leotion, a epeciat ravteu rec�ueat !o legalizo en exfsting �+ell eraploynQ unit on a �rcel aE tancl ��coximaitely thirty-nine (39) Unit aeceg in aixo and aituated in ehe AF-1 »one diaecict uiEhin the 4 Con't Aspan RpaCltl� F4[R Rancb. Thc subjacE p�op�[ty, ownod by prow„�ce Cotc, containQC1 both a prira�ry raaiclonec �n� an otght hundrecl , t8Q0) squacc Eoot, ona baslroo�+ cm�lpyco unit incated abovc a datached �,�rage. The appiicant h�� sut�c�itEed sut�taicrnt tnEor- �aatio� Ae�+�nstcating Ehat tha su�jeet s�nie vas construeted Arioc co a �une. 1481, whon cegulattan� gpv�[ning cmployce uaits 1rQF4 adO�i@�l. Rete�cal comc+ents �ara gvnec�lly sup�rtiv�s tbe Emtron- � 3 mo�eal Iteal�h pe�ack�+ent ha� indic�ceci �h�e �hc �xigting uall ansl pwnping systerr vau su£ficient �o accr�m,�oA�ee tuo (2) dwol]ings, �� and that an exisCing inJividual sewa�e �is�C+aal systea comFliQd uith applic�sbls �egulatians. The Caunty �ngineer indicatecl that aclaquate access and parking £acilities weGe provided. The E3uilding oepartment was unab2e ta laeake iii�c buildin9 perpit for s the entire garage struccure, and indicat�d �haG a� inspection vould ke r�quiF�d to vQrify compliance ui�h unif4ro t3uildinq C9de requi�ements. Finally, the proposed lot co�plieJ vith the minimum lot area reguirements of the subject zone district. The Planqing OfPice iecots�ended app�oval oE the application subjecE to the �ollowing f3ve 15) conditions: 1. the ow�ec shall covenant c+ith PxtkEn County that the Cote Employee Dwelling Unit shail be cestricted in terms of its use and occupancy to rental guidelines for low income e�ployee housin9 These rnvenants sha21 be deemed to run with tne land as a burden thereto for the bene£it of, and sha21 be specifically enforceable by, Pickin County or its _ designee by an app�opriace legal action including _,- -_ injunction, abatenent oc eviction of non-complying - - tenancy during the neriod of the life of the last �_`a':- surviving c�ember of the Boacd of County Commissioners _ of Pitkin County, Colorado, plus twenty-one (22) years, _ or for a period of �ifty (5U) years from the date of '='`�==-:-�Commissioner's t•teeting 11 February, 1985 - 4 �;" :xi _Kg-,_ _ r�`-�'r�� i.:4�r:,Y�� :�N°3: �'.�"'?`# - ,- •-�,. :�.i{.,E�r,•�-_;� "s`�`:: 't F -. �� + r�� — ri :- s�. ��t� �" .� 4�'�,.�cs��"9�� s�� ." y s , - y� �_ _.. :. ..y..<�,. .w-s..�,.�.. �... ,...,=..:..._,. . . ..,i' �sl"w:...:'.'+'.i��i.�� 'i' �°'��..h�.��w . recotdinq heteof in the Pitkin Connty real ptoperty recocds, vhfchever perfod shall be less. Prior ta final apptoval, the covenants shall be teviexed and appcaved by the Pitkin County Attorney 2, the awner shall have the ciqht ko lease the unit to a qualified e�playee of its oWn sele�tion. irie individual n�y be an ef��loyee af the owner, erployed as a cesidenC ca[eeak�r, grovfded such per5on fulfflls the �efinieion uf "�ualified em�ioyee" (any parson �urrAn�ly resfdfng �nd e�nploy�d i7 the City of Aspen and i�itkin County an average of thircy {�D) hnucs �ser wt�k, nihe (91 ndnth� aut �E �ny t+�elve (12) �onth pptiod whu shall u�e�t the 1dw ina�r.ta and oc�upanc�,+ e2igiHilfiry r�quiremAnts : h�n�raliy e�t�b]i�N�d �nd �pplf�d by ehc 1l�using f�uthociey vieh r��tseat tn e;7playc� hc►u�inc�l 3. vrrrlfi�aefah erf e:a�layui�ne nf thos� p�e�ons itvrng Cn thc h;��ley�� unit �hail t� ;c�:�,ri:. ; �nd flled uith tNc ttbuginq huCh�efty dFficc by thr �ivapr esf th� imit 4. iE eha ovn�e doQ�s nor r�ne ehe erahinyeQ unie ta � ' c��aliEipd �raplayae�, thQ e;��loy�e unit sshall be madQ avallatrlo, in �erordan�a with tha Iiou�sing Aurhoclty guidQllnerss, rirovidad� tho o++nor ah�ll haver thQ right to ap�cove �ny �coa�crctiva tenant, ablch a�tova� shall not bo uncaason�bly �3alayod or ulehhe+ld 5, the nulldinq �e�remane �hall conJuct an lna�etlon o! tnQ employoe ctweiling unit �ncl ehall voctEy that Ehe • unit �Qec� all a�pliaablc tlntPorp l�uildinq Coda � ccciuircrr�Qr►e8 �rior to the iu�unnco ot a CQrEiflcato oE Occu�an� , i �hi1d cx��aa�ccS ao�ae concern ehac tNe app2#cant could eelect an emQloyoc eo cegir�c in tho aubjeet uniti !t was not Ev2t, �or inatanco, �hat tho F�►ployoe Auelling 9niE ccgulAEioa� ' �rovtdoci for tho �alcetton o� a EonAnE by tbe app�[ea��. Ala� ? Richman ozplAinsd th�t tha c�+�loyao hauging guicla]lnea as + ostablishocl by thc ilou�inq Authority �rovidad fpr che aelaction � � oE a tanant �at aa e�pinycc d�clltng uni� by �n APplicanE � pcovidcd tAst the ten�nt v�� ualt�ied aa an ca�pioyQC. ,,,�� Tow Snith Qxpr@a�e€i �oAa eancern that �bc covenant r�stcict- � ing the use of �ha �ub'cet unit ba made a ��ttor ai cecorcl. Smith � a18o guestionvd ++he��er the unit camplied witb all ap�lieable ' re9ulaeions. Riek anexevich, an aCtQrney cepte�ent�ng the applicant, explain�d chat tb� covcsnant vauld b� dca�ted aod y submitted to the Cour►cy A�torney Ea� revie++ wi�hin the next sixty i (60) days, t�e no�ed �hat the subject anit co�plied with all ` applicable cequlationN �rith the exce�tian oi its slaes the unit 4AS �ligbtly laryer �han the seven hundred (700) �qua�e foot � limitation icaposed on such units. f � slake then o�QnQd the �+eeting for puhlic Gooment and ther� # was none. � • � Klandecud mored special ceviea approva2 of tae application `� suhject to the five (5) conditions of the Planning O�fice -::� identified above and further, subjecc to the fol2owing additional Condit2on: _ �� - - ='-:$ 6. the covenant deed restricting the unit to employee ` � housing in compliance with the use and occupancy _} rental guidelines for low income employee housing established by the Housing Authority sha12 tre approved �i-; by the County Attorney and cecorded within sixty (60) ;:.;_' _ , days fron the date of final approval y.� '� Child seconded and the motian passed unanimously. �,,:- .! � �jCoaemissioner's Fleeting I1 February, 2985 - 5 �<,.�, `� `a" 7 �z, * `! Tj� . , X,. :e- y� ;.v� .;r a .. 4 . ��. �`3w.��++.�"'Y dr '� �� .' t . . +-4 _ S� t,^ �� s;.x r�_L �,�`��r•:i�s� - ,._ _ . • �Ws4 .4xav.sn..-��;.*,rS�F?*.•-ti'i2�v..»:�.,.-� __.� ��« . '� . ±+C"�L:..x,:.-�,+'_. . Applicaht BroWnlee Cote noted that the subject property consisted of thirty-nitie and eiqht tenths (3�.8) acres, and he asked whether the e�Floyee unit xould affect his ability to achieve a lot split. Rfch.�a(t explained thn� Cote did not have the ability to �rovide for a lot split at this tire as a rini�u� of �orty (401 acres Way necesGary to achie��e the €ifty percent f504) density reduction recuired in thi� procedure. public �hd C�oard ecsnvened a trutrlic heacfnq to consfdcc Che mir�roth/ fleacing: t,llisun Poad v�catfon ap��lication, a re�ue�e to �orr�ct a �urv�y `�irtC�Ch/ cCCOC an ��st 5apri� Gteek f�b�d. Gfndy *touh�n subTieted ta thc Allinan tecord the Planning �Eftc� r;reno o: 11 �ebcuary, 1985, s plat tt�ad prhna[hd by r1l�ine 5urvey ancl dated zG tt�vc�bec, 198d, an� th� V�eSe� Lsn�1 Uce �vd� as a:�a�a�d to d�tc, iNe ��pll��tiar� aaC :ub;.wite�d tsy 3iw ?t��tr nE ,11�inc survQy in �n rEf�rt rv c�acre�t � sucvcy etcoc on a poceien �f Ea�e Se�pci� Cre�k haad. `The �ccual 1deaCinn of a pbrtion oE the l�d�d Naa ineonsiuecne aieh tha rihht-nE-v�y dcdic�raci far tt►i� �wc{xi�cr, and ehh �p�lia3nr h�s tequc�ntr�d ihar the Count}� vac�t� the Eic�he-af-v�y Ene eh�e �orainn oE �hc� aliryn�rne vh@r� th� !:o�d dnes twt, in �a�t, axiue, and accQpr suEEieiene rfght-o�-w�y for �hat porrtan �f ehe ttoad wher4 thQre ' iu none at thi� ri�a. Thr appltcatian �+as roEccr�d to thQ County engincer, who cecoc�endeci a�provai e� thu vae3tlon en� aeceptancQ � �as pro�aa�rc�, Th� i+lanht�c� AEf ica Ecrco:��n�tcrl ahpcoval of the ap�lleatton aieh�ut eondteton. t;tn�lnp nated ehat ehat �octi�on of �he Road outatdQ of thQ dedir�CCd ri�ht-��-ua}� s+aa �ltuated in tha vlctalty aF thQ Timcoth coaielance, and that ir ap�earQd that tNo Roacl uau conatructc� outHlde oE thc riryhe-oE-wax in an e@Eort to �sovQ it � Farehar �w�y Lrou+ the subjcct restciance. Ne ox�reaaed aoae concecn. hauovQr. a� to vhcther �hc� �copp�ecl vacation/acceptancQ uoulrl accvc �ha �ul�lic lnccrvsc, an�! h4 �akQd tt' tho Road ua� cver acceptcd by the �aunt� in it� eucc�rnt alignaant. Appilcant , �ia Rc�cr axplain�d ehat the aubjQCt porcion of ttto !toad uas - contctructeci in 1975. �nc� he uau�fseaad ehat i� was racceptod b� , �he �auncy a� thac cinn. To� �mieh auggQStecl eh�+t ttte �oard concli�i�n cilo approval o� 4 tha applicatiar� ta vcrifieaeip� by sta�F that the Road uas aeeapt�� by thQ C�auntj in i�� cxi�ting aliqnnan�, alakQ thsn o�ned the heaciny tac publi� cpr-4�+c�t. Applicant Jim Raser ex�a�.Ained that he dcafteci the apglication a� his awn - expense in an effort to cvrreck a survey error raade by hi$ ficm. !te fe2t that the County uauld be tbe benefiaiacy o� the vacakion/acceptance pcoposed, and hc requested a r�fund of �he oae khousand, tuo hundred and sixty-seven dollar (51,267) up�l�Gakion Eee. Blake asked iot additiana� com.�e�cs; tbece being none, the heacinq was c2osed. Child then roved to approve the application sutrject to the -`"�� ollowing two (2) conditions: -- � `;;, 1, veiification by County staff that East Soptis Creek �� `1 Road was publicly dedicaced and accepted by the ,_ # County in ics existing a2ignnent _ '.� - 2. the ceview and approval of the plat by the County ` T Attorney prior to recording Y ��_ Klanderud seconded and the motion passed with opposition from �,•-.,:�__;, Kinsley, who felt tnzt staff should verify the acceptance of the -- Road prior to approval. Blake explained that the Board �roa2d -�� consider the rebate of the application fee once the staff ceport .�; - ,'i�=�=,'�. Commissioner's tteeting 11 February, 1985 - 6 _�_�:�:��a i;�.�!'. r-��;b, ' 1" `�. . t n�}T ,p� � Q_» ��fiv r ��f �'j' : ` ��. .' . c. .� �� .. �.�. ��, zs�' �. . _. -s - �, _ . , �� -x .�-,�� '�cL,3Y.�'�� r`� . . . . . . . .......- .y -�._n...._. _� .__r., ._....��.. . w: _. . .. _ _.� _`' . on the public dedicatioo/acceptance of the P.oad vas prepared. 8urnt Environ�ental Coordinator f{ark ruller introduced a lettet lSountain addressed to 'rlhite 2iver ;tational Forest Supetvlsor Richatd �.A, i•.00drow representing the F3oacd's final response to the �orest hespond ServiCe on the IIurn. tfoahCafn Enviton�eatal r�sses�meht. Thc Ietter idehtified the followiny �ajoC concern�: - ehe l�pvetance of the Grewth ;lan�gement pc�licy t�ian and �pecifirally the 5ki Expansibn Yollcy - ehe fnade�quacy oE the d��nand analysiE rontained ia Che Envirunncneal ,ts�eg�ment. �nd th� irn�ottan�t of �gtablishin� th�esht�lds Eo Eriqger sapi��l farillEy upht�ci�g - ene ��a fdc � Cnunty-utde Eocus� on ski ex��n�ian an�2y�t� �nd dacinionr��kinry - wildli�Q, o+arc�r and air �ualYty eoneernu - tha nea� for es;tablitsbYnry a e�tsc li�ait on the valici[ty oIE thn Eindin�s enr�tainad [n �oth the �nvicoement�l AffaQa�arne �nd the For�c"t Sarvietr �eclaion Puliec al�o ou6�itead � cesolutton �n�oratrtg ehQ reaolutton oF tho @itkin County [�lanning and ?.oninq Coa�taalon in ras�aonsQ to the Durnt tiounealn „nvlronmenEal Aa�o�g�ant as taoue<i by tha Unitod Statea Focc�e Secvtee. The re�olutton apNrovod by ehQ Comminaion Founa eh�� chc Enviranmonral A�IIaaa�+onk p�oparcd by th� Forcot Setvicc eoneatno�] aaE�lctanc inForaAtion Eo deEeiaine tNat the tiurnt ltoun�atfl expanulan f�ro�o�acl by eho Aspe� Skiing Com��a�y wa� gut�A�aneisliy inconaistenE sa�th �ac3u�stv�3 County goal�, pol►efas ancl plans. and waa, eherQtoro. cotaliy un�cceptable. Fullor explain�ci chat the Plan�ing AnJ za�ing Capmi�sion wc� � ��.mber oP Ciacs An�3 di�cutssocl thG 5nvic�nm�,nka1 Aat�osament rlucln� publie neetiays �€ �rcae 24nc�th. Tt�� Corar�i�sia� eonduetecl � j9int � vork sossiofl vie� Eho R�ard lasC :t�ndc�y, �n�l gubscquentl/ clraEted - And appcoveci thQ ��3plutiAn referQncac3 abave. :;.1 ' alaks �xpres�QC� s4-�c eoncern with the pcoce�s th�ough which ' ; �ha lectec w�s dra�te�� staf.� wa� inse�u�ted, �or inatanea, Eo address thc coneerns of the noar�, khe Planning Car�mission � subsequently �evi�ued the Enviranrrental Assessr�enC, and the Board { wt�� nov pcesenteu uft� a letcer indieating oppositian tp the � antire Aspen Skiing Corapany pcoposal, alake nated that, although � he was concerncd uith certain aspects o� cbe appliaation, the letter submikted foc uoacd approval today mpce than ackisessed those concernst the letter cited. for instanee, a 4and Ose Code provision concecning a �rohibition against nuisances, a provision ' wbich �:as not consid�red appiicable to che issue. f Fuller explained that he did �ot teel Ehat he should cite _ the various Code nrovisions at his discretion, rather, it was � felt that all of the various provisions shauld be submitted ior _:. j Roard review, •^`� IIlake explained �hat, in addition to the overall tone of the letter, he did not agree arith certain of iEs iindings. The letter : � indicated, for instance, within the context of growth impacts, • that the expansion of Burnt Fiountain Hould result in greater - _ demand for nec� residential housing, which housing would then _ - result fn the cemoval of agricultura2 lands, the diminishment of - �ater, and othe[s. Blake did not feel that the expansion as - proposed aould necessarily lead to undeniable pressures for ' greater residential development, and neither was it felt chat _ :; such developraent could be Zinked ta the loss of agricultural � �- - lands, water, and others. .;:: r�� ~ lCommissioner's tleeting lI February, Z985 - 7 : t+ S.�-�.'�f .�.�,».�««� ,�»�.... ._ _. , .. _�,. .-:, �-��` �. r �- � �' . .....� .��,.�k. •f .., --.._. ..w �te-� � +a- ...`� �.� '� h� �y�M�. ...: . . . -, .- .. ._ 3-�.;.... �.'F_i �if" E`uller explained that the Environ�ental AssesSment pr�pated by the Forest Service included not only the proposed expansioh but denand foC residential develop�ent in the vicfnity, and patticularly the ptopos�d East Vi2lage, inpacts on agrfcultutal lands and water, and others. For this reason, the letter Kas dtafted to addces� all of the5e issues. t.in�ley felt that there Was a dfrect relationship betcreen the expansion of 3urnt ;tountain afld denand for addfefonal re�identia2 dev@lapnent, and the lettec �hould addres� this concern accorclir��ly. ffl�ke rioted Ehat th�te h�� been de:�atld fot adtiltlAr�al tct�iciential 8ev�18pr.�er�t �C the base of thp t3ueEecnilk Ski r�tea fbr a na;�b�rr uf ye�r�, Whieh develog�,rant h�s been d�nicd. �1ake Ee1e e»�t thc �xp�nc�ion r,� a skf at�a and thc dQnand £or n�v - hnusin� W�uld n� aa�lc��sea rhr�ugh �++a ;�) aQpac�re rroz�€ss�s, uu�h vo �haC ehe iink�ga� nnted in thg lrzeehr w�$ nat npceggarily apt,rl i�abl c�. Klan�i�rucl noeec3 ari�e �he reanlutivr� �do�t�d 6y tha Plannfnc� and �ontnq C�raraiacia:� v�a Sor�e++hse eonrcadl�rory. �Che te�olutinn lndiratgd, fnr Intstan�te, thae �Na �c��tted �xpannion coulc� not occuE dn che i��gig nf Lncanat4tehr� uith varioua County goals, ob��eelvrs and holi�taa, yQt tlian fnclieacerl ehat varlous IasuQa. tncludinc� i��etc on lars�. �ratar, air, notae an�i wil�lt�e. shoulrl Be adricoaacd. '"h� fin�lingg of th� Co�a.�t�;fan. ►rNi1Q It1��CIIC�fltj that eho Qx�an�ion coulci not occur, woul� appear tn indicate et��t thQ expaneian couici be eonolderacl an�a eMe vartous i�a�aeta aare addceggcd. i:innicy notad tbat ther� �are algniElcan� dcvclopraen� !nlaceata in th4 tiasa2t = E2 ,7ebe�1 ar�n, vhich intoccata coul�l be . 2inkeci to aki area QxPansion io the County. The ex�nslon ao propoucd sould sshiEc thc g�owtt► itapace� clovnvalley �nd. Aa c� ' reaul"t, onto �tate ttigh�$y �2. � �landecucl �groa� eE�at, pechaps, ski �rea exPanaion c�ay not ' ncca�sarily �ocve ta g�reci�itatc no� caaicicntial �evelop�entr � sueb clovQ�oproont wcsu aluQ a ��etar oE ��kct conclitiona, q�outh eontcal g4licies enaete�S uy political sntitias, and othcca. In thls i�scancct. 1ipu4vec, K1anciccud nQted ttiat thQ exlsting Snou�a�s Skl Ace� t►ad a c�pa�ity o� �an thQUSand I1a,000) skieca and a bed �apacit�r of only �ix tt�ousancl (6,AQQ)� given tbis imbalancc, it uas felt thae tbe proposecl expansion of t�urnt tlountain uou2d, in �ac�, precipitace demsnd �ar addlCional residential/lodqing facilities. Blake exp2ained that he ton tias r.oncerned that there vas greater skiing aapacity at this time than bed capacity, ti� noied, ha�rever, that the Environr.+ental Assess�ent pcocess vas a very lang pcocedure anc thac the proposed expansion would mosk likely noC occu� foc a number o� yeacss the ic+palance beCueen skiet and ' bed capacity may not, £or instance, be as significant in futuce � veass when the expansion Would Zike2y occur, t��ith respect to the lettec, E31ake did nnt support the link3ge between skier demand/ - ; Fapacity and nev Xesidential grotrth� and 'ne difl noc feel that Ehe need foC a County-wide focus on ski expansior. analysis and � ` � decisionmaking was critical; the impoctance of establishing -_,; th[esholds to trigger capital facilit7 uP9rades, and the need to t estab2ish a time linii for the validity of the findings contained ''°' in the EA and Lhe Porest Service decision, wece, however, considered critical. in addition, the wildlife impacts were - consideted critical., although it was noc £elt that such should be - linked to the loss of agricultural lands, the 83minishment of air � ; quality, aater rights, and others. � Child noted that, upon the sub�aission of an application for Haystack tioun�ain by the Aspen Skiing Corporation approximately ''''c'`�Commissionet's !]eeting 11 Febreary, 1985 - 8 >�::';,�_.,' :=r7� ��.'. :.X.^.:�t . �, - ��;. �rtn -�� .. ; �.i,� -i � _ �, s�'�y .� , r.: . � � . . . 't' y� Y �, �� '}' �,.s�� . , "" ' ' : >} Y.i < � �..:s`}� 'E /. { ..-i�� l2�r - �v... .... .� .✓ .� �. . �5 �y.. . �r.vvaw. t �'�� .��:Y.�i;.4 ... .. • �.... , i,�' .F .yr+iw._..ti . >L.�,: #r' fifteen (15) years ago, an agplication Was sub�itte8 by Snownass Cottages fot sixty (60) ca3fn uhits, a general store, �nd othets. The 5nownass Cottages application r+as subnitted in anticf�ation of the develo�ent of :taystack t;ountai n, and Was indicative of the teaction by the prfvate sector to antici�ated appravals. Child fe2t that naintainin� a balance between cor:�un- ity beds and skffnq capacity, and thotouqhly mitigating afr and caater quality i;�pacts, aere �he nast ctitfeal concerns aS�oCiaCed Hith the ptoposed expa:�sfon. t3lake ag�frt reviestrd the letter and suqg�se�d tttat refecence to �11 5ec�ions concecnipg �nvieon;�cntal In�acts, with the dit�epeibn of 5ection 2--3.3, 2-3.�1 and 2-3.6, be d�leted. In addininn� eti� linkage ��t�bli�hed betsrern n�u growCh and tee pr�g�rvation of ahricultur�l landa �hnuid be d�l�tcd, and ehr� r�ne�ttn noee8 wieh renpcck tv eh� fmpaetc nf the rixp�ngtnn on • u�t�c r�t�autc�g in rhe 5naw:�ass �r��k V�lley sNould be cctvi�cd. FinaYly, th� inextctr�bl� 2ink�c��r beeuern the ex�ncfon and !h� d�:vela�n�nt aP �ast Villa�e n�t�d in tl�e rdnciustnn di tha 1Qttec ghau2� t�e ��2�t�d. Pl�nnec Glenn Ilnrn r�ae�rl that �ha �^uw�� o£ Snaw��gs Vtllaya haa indirated thac cha Eact villarye pco�a�ty waa ancr of tho loweet �rioci�y �itcc foc devalopcaent at thta tirae� tho Toan has a�rQQd to re-cvaluata thls dQSignation, hoe+ever, in tbQ event thct �urnt KounCatn �xp�naton waa a��rovod. �ou�Ey dlanaqor 3ohn F,ldect noted that buildout Sn thQ County uass only one h�►lt {.g1 oE whae ++as silawed undec axiuting zontng at �Nis �Ima. Ita gu�ryoatad thae eho rioncct �onasae�, in con�une- tlon ultte Chet reviow o� tha F,.A., thQ iaval oE bulidouE Ehat tho tloard dealrod to oceur, the �icne �vciad ovQr r+hich it would ° oecur, an�l its cctatlon�hi{� ro r�kling cag�city. ;;inalcy notsc3 that a��lition�l nkiinc� capa�:iCy dicl noE ncccs��rtly pr�ssuppoIIe acidictanal residcn�ial grovlh. Ilc l�ol�, t►o++ovsr, Ehat thc areaeton aF Acldicional �kitng ca}jacity ereated pree�uco Coc gFQA�vr clevQloptaont. ancl �hat It woulr� be rQpcesan- - ; ta�tive af an incrar.+¢nral �tap e9uacd� sueh �icvcrlo�xaant. � KlanclQ�c�d npcc�i chac ther� ++a� qr�ater skiinc� capaciCy fn �nau�►a�a Vlllagc at this 'timc than bect capacity, ��d �he �elt that tha progo$ec3 expanssan uouid i�evitably lead co cicvclop�annt ' �ressure tar aJclictonal bed €aeilicies. l�lanclerucl ag�eed that a balance betwven �kii�g and b�d ea[�acit�• was impaCtant, and sltc nated thac the Gittle An�ie ski area ua� revievecl vithin this ' GQRk@Xt) there ua:, greater aed capacity in the Aspen area than skiing capaciky, fac instance, anc3 it s+as partly on thi.s basis ' tbat tbe Little Anaie p�oposal uas approved, Kinsley noted tt�at the p�opvsed ex�ansion of Burnt tiountain would likely noL occur until substantial impravements vece made : to the three {3) existi;tg ski areas oNnQd by the Skiing Company. and that both the Comgany and the Foresc Service have indicated ' such. He was particularly concerned, then, with the staiE recommendation that the validity of the Envi�onmental Assessment - be limited to the yea[ 1990. Thece was concerr., for instance, that the time limit may create pcessure to aehieve the expansion �' -°.-� at this tiAe, not on the basis of demand or need but due to the ; fact that the permit issued by the Forest Service wou3d expire in - - 1940. There uas also some concern that the five (5) year time frame for zhe permit may not be reasonable, as there was tne - patential for substantial changes in circumscances within this _ period, Fuller explained that the Forest Service imposed, as a - matter of policy, a limitation on the va2idity of every special use permit issued; the permit issued for the Little Annfe ski ��;; _.. � area, foc instance, has already expired as that development did _ not occur within the validation period. trith respect to the �'.�' >.Commissioner's tieeting 11 February, Z985 - 9 x�`.��=.+� - ...., ,a,«,�M��:,w..n..... .. ..... ,.., ... .. . . � . ..�. f., -4 Y��"'Y-r ' .� ,� -, �,:, .:.. � y, ,. -- _�l3��Y1G��n r,Y'� �x'.'�` ' ... . . . r:��.w�s.=i.r�rr e. ... .�w*..,4a-�-:..i-^...._... .-._� ..��....r,r._ �«.X,.��«r,r-f�.r.�..�. . potential for changes in circu�stances during the next five (5) years, such Would be addressec3 provided thresholds for triogeting capital facilfty upgrades were established. The eoard generally agreed, with respect to Environnental Inpa�ts, to delete reference to Sec�ions 2-3.1, 2-3.2 and 2-3.5, and with respe�t ta Compatibilfty rrith Agricultutal Lands and Opetations, to delete Sections 2-13.2, 2-13.4, and 2-13.5. In addition, the ?3oard genetally agteeci, Frith the exceptfon of Kirtsley, to dele.e :he teEeret�ce to the "inextticable littkage" betNeen the pco;�oved expan�fon and the develapnent of East Vfl2aqe. Ctsild as'r.ed i: the resal�rtion �ubwirt�d Eor 3oacd tt�view eoday +ras lrtcbn9i��enC Nith thc lettec, �u11ec explatned thae eHe l�xet�c a�s c�caEt�d to addr��s variou� Land Us� �od� provtsions, s+h�r�a� eha cesoluti�n iden+�ifiea tha go�l� and �nlicie� of ehe Grouth itanaqenent i�licy p1an. Kin�ley nc�vrci eo appcuvQ ehe racolutinn and Child necnnded. Plannin� �nd Zdniny Ca�nigntnn Chairnan Su�anno Ca�skc�y explainr�d thae th� Coccv:�issnion ado�stad it� ccuolutt�n by a �tgin • oE thrrrQ !l) tn tud {2), shc� axplaine8 that thc Coc�,ai�aton dtd not mt►ke �ny ne��aent on tha vsrtou,� cievelo�►an� alternoiivas [dentifl�d t� tha �nvfrone��neal �tsne��ra�nt, r�tNQ�, Cba Cotara- isatoi� only indicae��l itz� uH�o�ition �o the dQV�lo�saent al�erna- �Ivc (�co�o aed by tlie �kltng Comp�ny. Caak�p Eclt thae thare was un�ni�+aua oppA�tcion �n t1�e Coszalsaion to �1lecrn�tive 'i1,►o (2), oc tha anv�lo�+Qne pco��gal lniefated by the Compnnys ehQ two �?) �a-�bcrcc ulto oppoaod �ho rcEOlution dtrl eo. Nownvcr, on the ba�lg th�c the Cn�za�aalon did not op�ose all o€ eha dav@lop- «aent ale�rnattrresi i-t_ .. ,es": i:: �t�a �nvicAi�rae�eal llaaesancat. Fl��c�@cud ag�in exprai��QC1 earieern utth tha rauolaEton a�lopEa�i tsy ehe Al�nnin�} and 2oniny Co�.��aio�, �n� spvcifically� with ti►c �n�,iguity �x�cea�e� vich ces;�4et ta AlEaenativa R�+� (2y , t�lanciccud f�lt �hnE A1tQrnc�tivc Two (2) vas Qnttiely incon�sistrnt with �hc goal�, oi�jerctivo� ��d pol�,eics aclopEacl by tha County, and shQ ++as ce�ecrn@d th�t thcr rasolutton acloptecl by the C(1M3$g�Qfl gvemed ea indieace that this Alternaciva aoulA b� conaicicr�d in the evene adequace mitic�Ation Va� domanstcaEed. Klanderuc� sul�9c�cer� thac the re�alution subwit��d �'c►� Ifoard > a��coval coday be c�visad t4 �f1(�lCdt6 e4oaeptual �ncior�ement of ' that ado�ted by che Caeanissian anct furche�, tp indicate chAt Alterna�ive 7uo tz) �hould be denied given its inconsisto�ay vith adoptcd goals and polieies. tt�d�en requeNted tbat the lek"t�r indicate thak khe noacd was nat ogposec3 to ski acea rlevelopc�e»t �hen su�h was neceasacj to su�port ehe comnunity, and chat there uas some coneeptual supQ9rt �oc khe fouctb develop:nent altecnaeive idenkificd in the 5nviron- mental Analysis. The r�otion initiated hy �inslel Passed with opposition from Rlande[ud and Blake. Kinsley then r�oved to approve the letter addressed to the Forest Service Supe[visor subject to the deletion oF Sections 2-3.1, 2-3.2, 2-3.5, 2-13.2 and 2-13,A, and further. to the deletion of the pt�rase "inextricable linkage" referenced between the proposed expansion and the developc�ent of East Village and � finally, subject to a final ceview of the revised letter by the - " Board during a work session tomorroi,r norning. Rlanderud seconded and the notion passed unanimously. = Public F�oody Creek Road resident Stanley tlatal discussed snow - Comment renoval and dust contcol on the Road, tlatal was concerned that Commissioner's Ueeting 11 Febcuary, 1985 - 10 . T., 4i'f '.�:•�_�;'•_e¢:'.�. "Y,y-.�,�:r"_y... :.i:;�i••r"-".}. . �- •x_. � �-,, t�, .� �.�.`r-�y��, �� ; � � � -. �,�: ;� ._ �_ H�'�.� .i��!`,y�}�; , � -''y�5�, ;:�. ..,.. .'-�.�. �t `��"'�'�``��'��:�'' �` �� . �f ;� `f '.r.-, snow vas ploved to the lowet side of the Road durittg snow removal and he t�quested that it be plou�d to the upper side instead. �tatal's barns xere situated very close to the lrn+er sid� uP the road and there was coneprn that, during the spring CtihOE�r the barri area would become nucidied ana, as a result, endanger his calving ape�ation. Natal e�cpZained that the snaw could be noved tb the uppec sfde of the Rcrad irtstead and subseguentiy salted t� provfde for f��ter neltfng. ttatal was �iso concerned xith dast Cr�nerol on the ttoad ducing the sur�ner nnnths; there aete � nufiber b� renCa�. units on the iioad and Et re�eiV�d a signific5nt d�g[ee nf r�rre�tional u�e, all o£ vhirh ju�rifie�l great�r dust rontrol. tlatal nat�d that a dust runCtollant vau �ppli�d co a p�ttion nf the 1Roac�, and he c�e�uest�d eh�t thi� pc�gran be exrenci�d �a�b y��c t� a11ow Ez�r applt�c�elon di tri� entit� Aoad. tt�t�l Was also cc►na�acn�d Wirh the det�risr�eion di tnrai ar�as c►f the C�vnry, and patriCUlacly eh� d�rline of fanily fem�. Et� #relt that eha IIoard �hnald aclnpe �ome s�ct nE inranrivr rn provid� #or �h� Cdflt�tlU@[I nraint�nanr� uE thQ $mati�r Eatni2y farnn. Pin�11y, Ftata� <; Wag concecned With rh� gc�ding �rbecam f�llove8 by rh� Cbun�ys ' ; eaeh ttm� thr rnad� ��re gcaded anci thQ ditche€ CZQ�fQt�� tHe � �lopea w�re eue inco �o a gccz�e�c extnrtt re�ulting In vi8et - ,i rards. Qlatai wass concQCned ehac the ryradin� �ro�ram rg�ulted in gcaater gcosion and the re�aovai oE nntivte v�a�etatton. The Doard gen�cally agceed to rQEcrc ttarr�i�s augr�oatione vl"th ccopect co snow c@�aaval. du�e conerol �nd c�rading Eo tbe �toad and , Dcid�a �pairt�QOt. � Theee boing no [ucthQr bu�inoaa, tho �aec�iny vas adjournetd. ; � i ' } ':� i :-, { . ..� ;� "_, , , t ,. # - t t � , _- � ; ;r ,� .� -°� �� *-- :;� �.'_ '� �F:�F�`�: { °:�:=� :�x-s �';,°"�.,'"�:�� =�= � , .�..:;�� -� F,�-,,. '�rt�.� _,�-,•,� ;� ;�:' _ _�Commissioner's t•feeting 11 February, 1985 - 11 �'' ~�� ..- ,. 1 .fi t.�w.'•�•�.x�. 1985 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING EXHIBITS February I 1 Pitco Code Amend-Air A Memarandum Dated February 6, 1985 from Lee Cassin, Pollution Regs-Changes in Environmental Health Deparhnent Proposed Variance Procedure for County Woodburning Resolution Wexner Lot Split B Memorandum Dated February 11, 1985 from Cindy Houben, Planner,to Board of County Commissioners Brownlee B.Cote Employee C Memorandum Dated February 11, 1985 from Cindy Houben, Dwellin Unit S ecial Review Planner,to Board of Coun Commissioners D Memorandum Dated December 4, 1984 from Jim Adamski, Housing Office,to Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority Board and Richard Grice,Planner E Memorandum Dated December 6, 1984 from Patsy Newbury, Zonin Official,to Richard Grice,Planner F Memorandum Dated December 7, 1984 from Ron Thompson, Count En ineer,to Richard Grice,Planner G Memorandum Dated January 30, 1985 from Bob Nelson, Environmental Health,to Cindy Houben,Planner Timroth/Allison East Sopris H Memorandum Dated February 11, 1985 from Cindy Houben, Creek Road Vacation Planner,to Board of County Commissioners I Survey of Proposed Road V acation—County Road Right-of- Way Pro osed Acce tance Public Comment J Letter Dated February 1, 1985 from Stanley Natal to Board of County Commissioners Re: County Road Maintenance ' � �y 7 . • ASPEN4►PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH C�EPARTMENT P1 E P4 O R A N D U M r::--'�) C, Cr;. , : .. .; A 7..''..,_;i C�'. r-;��a TO: Board of County Commissioners ��,�o EXHiBIT �£C s�t��y� � SCON'T: FRnM: Lee E. Cassin '_'=:',. L'c DATE: February 6, 1985 RE: Chanqes in Proposed Variance ProcedurP for County I400dburninct Resolution Attached you will find the new language of the Variance pro- cedure. It was changed based on the worksession of_ 2-4-85 which resul- ted from concerns raised by Tom Dunlon about enforcement. The revised or new sections are underlined. The changes are: 1} devices may not be made permanently inoDera- ble. They must be replaced by clean-burning devices in order to be used as an offset. 2) There is a sunset orovision. 3) Penal- ties are included. i 1 I � 130 5outh Galene Stre@t Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-2020 � _..__._..__,_. IlSMORANDD!! T+DliRD OT C0. GO:::.;'i:'S PIT7{I21 C0. T0: Board of County Commissioners rubii.c Ilearin6 �::iiibit:. FROF2: Cindy Aouben, Planning Office D"''D EXH16R 5ub3;.c h � RE: Wexner Lot Split ,-,_,,. I;� � DATE: February 11, 1985 ______________________________________________________________________ The Planning Office recommends that this application be tabled to your next meeting, February 25, 1985, in order to meet adjacent property owners notification requirements. The notice was properly published at least 30 days prior to this meeting date, but adjacent property owners were not sent copies o£ the notice. A new notice was pcepared and has been sent to adjacent property owners notifying them that the meeting wi].Z take place on February 25, 1985, The applicant has been notified of the error and corrective action taken. i i � � 1 � , t F i t i � 1 i �... �., _ !lBt�oR�1NDII!! r.:,._;;> o: c;�. �. . . I�t.i„_-i 5�.�. F:tUl.i c nr.:c EXHFBIT T0: Board of County Commissioners ��..,�`�� t,t, coN'T FROM: Cindy Houben, Planning Office '-�'�'�• I�' RE: Cote Employee Dwelling Unit Public Hearing DATE: February 11, 1985 --------------------------- RBQDFST: Public Aearing/Special Review request to legalize an existing enployee housing unit. APPLICANT: Brownlee B. Cote RBPRffiffiiT�TIVS: Richard A. Rnezevich LOC�TION: A 39+ acre parcel in the SE� SW:. Section 25, Township 8 South, Range 85 West; located at 2720 River Road in the Aspen Roaring Fork Ranch. S�ING: AF-1 SITB pATA: The site is 39+ acres and includes a prim ary residence and the subject employee housing unit. PROJSCT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting special review approval to legalize an existing 800 sq. ft., one bedroom employee � dwelling unit (located above a garage) . The application indicates t that the unit was built prior to regulations governing enployee units. t ACCBSS: Existing, off lowec River Road, #16. WATBB: Existing well. SEWBR: Existing individual sewage disposal system. DTiLITI&S: Existing. � 1 PPiRRIHG: One parking space exists for each bedroom in the primary � residence and one space exists for the one-bedroom anployee dwelling 3 units. � REFBRRALS: ' � Housing Office: A memo dated December 4, 1984 from the Director of Housing recommended approval to legalize the existing bandit em ployee housing unit under the following restrictions (see meno attached hereto) : i a. The owner shall covenant with Pitkin County that the Cote � Employee Dwelling shall be restricted in tern►s of its use and occupancy to rental guidelines for low income employee ' housing. These covenants shall be deemed to run with th e land as a burden thereto for the benefit of and shall be specifically enforceable by the Pitkin County or its designee by an appropriate legal action including injunction, abatement or eviction of non-complying tenancy during the period of the life of the last surviving member of the presently existing Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, plus twenty-one (21) years, or for a period of fifty (50) years from the date of recording hereof in the Pitkin County real property records whichever period shall be less. Prior to final approval, the covenants shall be reviewed and approved by the Pitkin County Attorney. , b. The owner shall have the right to lease the unit to a qualified enployee of its own selection. The individual may be an enployee of the owner, employed as a resident caretaker, provided such person fulfills the definition of "Qualified Employee" (any person currently residing and employed in the City of Aspen and Pitkin County an average of 30 hours per week, nine months out of any twelve month period who shall meet the low income and occupancy eligibility reqvireznents generally established and applied by the Housing Authority in respect to enployee housing. c. Verification of eaployment of those persons, living in the e�nployee uait shall be completed and filed with the Housing Authority Office by the owner of tl�e nnit. d. If the owner c3oes not rent the employee unit to a qualified employee, the employee unit shall be made available, in accordance with the Aousing Authority guidelines, provided the owner shall have the right to approve any prospective tenant, which approval shall not be unreasonably delayed or withheld. Btwirot�ental Health: A memo dated January 30, 1985, from Bob Nelson, Environmental Aealth Officer, indicated that the well and pumping system for drinking water met sanitary standards and is sufficient to serve two dwellings. in addition, the individual sewage disposal system meets the requirements of the 1981 revised regulations of the 1981 revised regulations on Individual Serage Disposal Syste�s (see memo attached hereto) . ' Building Depart�ent: A memo dated Decem ber 6, 1984, from Patsy Newbury, the zoning official from the Building Department, noted that they could not locate the pern►it for the garage structure (employee i unit) and that a living space in the building will require an inspection to verify conformity with the Uniform Building Code requirements (see ; memo attached hereto) . Bngineering Departaent: A memo dated Decem ber 7, 1984, indicated that the Engineering Department did not have any concerns regarding this proposal. PLANNIN6 OFFICB COML�9TS: ; The proposal meets the �nployee dwelling unit regulations as outlined in Section 3-8.13(a) (see Resolution 84-65) . 1. The proposed lot conforms to the minim�m► lot area requirements within the AF-1 zone district. 2. The enployee unit will only have one bedroom. The size of the unit is not limited since the unit was constructed prf or to the regulations being adopted, Jane 8, 1981. The application includes a 1980 IRS tax return supplemental income schedule reflecting rental income from the employee unit. 3. The proposal includes one (1) parking space for each bedroom within the principal unit and one (1) off-street parking space for the enployee unit. 4. The applicant agrees to develop a deed-restriction which will guarantee that the enployee unit shall rem ain a rental unit; not be oondominiumized; not be occupied by the owner or a spouse; be limited to occupancy by not more than two (2) persons per bedroom (including children), who qualify as (and have been found by t2ie Pitkin County Housing Authority to be) employees of the community under such guidelines as may be from time to time established by such authority; and be rented for tern►s not less than six (6) month s. 2 , 5. Sufficient servfces, utilities and access are in existence for the proposed use. PL�lIiNING OFFICS RBCO!!!lSBII�?IOA: The Planning Office recommends approval of the request to legalize the existing bandit employee housing unit with the following conditions: 1. The owner shall covenant with Pitkin County that the Cote Efiployee Dwelling shall be restricted in terms of its use and occupancy to rental guidelines for low income gnployee housing. These oovenants shall be deemed to run with the land as a burden thereto for the benefit of and shall be specifically enforceable by the Pitkin County or its designee by an appropriate legal action including injunction, abatement or eviction of non-complying tenancy during the period of the life of the last surviving member of the presently existing Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County. Colorado, plus twenty-one (21) years, or for a period of fifty (50) years from tl�e date of recording hereof in the Pitkin County real property records whichever period shall be less. Prior to final approval, the covenants shall be reviewed and ; approved by the Pitkin County Attorney. 2. The owner shall have the right to lease the unit to a qualified enployee of its own selection. The individual may be an employee of the owner, employed as a resident caretaker, ` provided such person fulfills the definition of "Qualified � Employee" (any person currently residing and employed in the City of Aspen and Pitkin County an average of 30 hours per ti week, nine months out of any twelve month period who shall � meet the low income and occupancy eligibility requiregnents I generally established and applied by the Housing Authority � in respect to employee housing. � 3. Veriffcation of enployment of those persons, living in the � enployee unit shall be completed and filed with the Aousing Authority Office by the owner of the unit. i ? 4. If the owner does not rent the employee unit to a qualified � enployee, the �nployee unit shall be made available, in ; accordance with the Housing Authority guidelines, provided ; the owner shall have the right to approve any prospective tenant, which approval shall not be unreasonably delayed or wi thheld. 5. The Building Department shall conduct an inspection of the enployee dwelling unit and shall verify that the unit meets all applicable Uniform Building Code requirements prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. � 3 . , � � . [•I E A1 O R A r1 D U td TO: The Housing Authority Board of tl�e City Of �lspen and Pitkin County cc: to Richard Grice, Planner FROI•i: J. Lucas Adamski, Director of Housir}� EXHIBIT DATE: December � , 1984 ��;;�,: � � P.E: Cote Employee Dcaelling Unit ��0 SLb j;, DfnTELL Cl�1U�T'....__......... ..,_.i. I"o. . --##2_.._....... I. Project: Cote Employee Da�elling Unit A. Description: The applicant is requesting specia2. revieca approval for the legalization o� an existing bandit emp7. oyee housing unit. The Employee Unit contains approximately 800 square feet of total floor area and contains one bedroom. B. Applicant: Browlee B. Cote - C. Location: Aspen Roaring Fork Ranch, 2720 River Road in Pitkin County (Tracts 69 & 84 Secti�ons 2S and 36 , Township 8 South, Range 86 P7est) . . D. Eaisting Use: The Employee Unit was completed and in exi stence pri or to J une 8, 19 81 . E. Proposed Use: The applicant shall by deed restriction or other permanent commitment running with the land, guarantee that the Employee Unit shall remain a rental unit; not be condominiumized; not be occupied by the owner or spouse; be limited to occupancy by not more than 2 persons per bedroom t including children) who qualify as (and have been found by the Pitkin County Housing Authority t� be) employees of the community under such guidelines as may be from time to time established by s�uch Authority, and be rented f or terms not less than 6 months. G. Zoning: The property is curr�ntly zoned AF-1 and contains approximately 39 .08 acres. The property � contains one primary residence and one detacher] structure, comprised of a lower level used as a garage for the primary residence anc� an upper level currently used as a single family residential dwelling unit. Such upper unit is hereafter referred to as the "Employee Unit" . 1 � .. .. .. � �� II. AOUSING AUTHORITY REVTEiO ' This unit� �meets the criteria as outlined in the Pitkin County Land Use Code Section 3-f3.].3 (1) (a) " Newly constructed employee units shall not have more than one (1) bedroom nor exceed five hundred (500) square feet of total floor area, provided that Employee units in the R-15 zone shall be Iimited to studios not to exceed three hundred fifty (350) square feet (although there sha11 be no limitation on area in the case of employee units constructed prior to the effective date of this regulation) , and has provided one additional off-street parking space for the one bedroom employee dwelling unit, the applicant representations are approved conditzoned on the Housing Authority recommendations. " III. HOUSIr1G AUTHORITY RECAi91�1ENDATIOPIS The Fiousing Authority recommends approval of the applicants request to legalize the er.isting bandit employee housing unit under the following restrictions: The owner hereby covenants with Pitkin County that the Cote employee d�aelling unit shall be restricted in terms of its use and occupancy to rental guidelines for low income employee housing. The owner of the unit, shall have the right to lea se the unit to a qualified employee of its own selection. Such individual may be an employee �f the owner, employed as a resident caretaker, providea such person fulfills the definition of "Qualified Employee" set forth herein, "�ualified Employee" as used herein shall mean any person currently residing and employed in the City of Aspen and Pitkin County an average of thirty (30) hours per week, nine ( 9) months out of any twelve (12) month period who shall meet the l ow incame and occupancy el i gi bil i ty requirements generally established and applied by the Housing Authority in respect to employee housing. Verification of employment of those persons, living in the employee units shall be completed and filed with the Housing Authority office by the owner of the unit. If the Owner does not rent the employee unit to a qualified employee, the employee unit shall be made available in accordance F�ith the Housing Authority guidelines, provided the Owner shall have the right to approve any prospec- tive tenant, which approval shall not be unreasonably delayedor withheld. These covenants sha].1 be deemed to run with the land as a burden thereto for the bene�it of and shall be specifically enforceable by the Pitkin County or its designee by an appro- priate legal action including injunction, abatement or eviction of noncomplying tenancy during the period of the 1 ife o£ the last surviving member of the presently existing Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County Col ora do plus twenty-one (21) years, or for a period of fifty ( 50) years from the date af recording hereof in the Pitkin County real property records whichever period shaZl be less. 2 � f 'ASI�EN�PiTKlltii'V.�EGIONAL BUIL�IItiG �EPARTMENT ML'MORANDUM T0: Richard Grice, Planning Dept. T�1,I;D Oi� C0. CO:::.t'P.�S P.LTKZN C0. FROM: Patsy Newbury, Zoning Official Public �� Da�o E�B!T DATE: December 6, 1984 � � � SuLjcc LL CON T RE: Cote Employee Housing ?-;-�,. I; -- ,._, ... �The house owned by Mr. Cot� was built under the permit 4�3723. This building has a Certificate of Occupancy. The garage workshop was built under a separate permit (which has evidently been misfiled) . It was built by Ivar �idsmo at least one year a£ter the house was build. There is no permit that converted it to a living unit. [�ny living space in the building will require some inspections for conformity to the Uniform Building Code requirements. PN/ar affices: mail address: 110 East Hallarr� Street 506 Eest Main St�eet Aspen, Coloredo 8'1611 30�/925-5973 Aspen, Coloredo 91611 ' ' �,� 1 �\1 . . � pitkin county ' 506 east main street aspen, coloredo 81611 MEMORANDUM T0: Richard Grioe yaiL:n or co. co:::.,�z�; i ZTIZII� C0� E�ik4: Rcxl ZYlcx[QSOn � Public ' EXHIBIT IaA2�: Deaember 7, 19 84 �. ;c ..::i�:�:.�t � CON'T F1E: CAte �layee Unit ,:.:.. i'•�. — `, I have no probl�em with this application. • • \ i • • �ASPEN+PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAI� �-IEALTH C)EPARTMENT E!•ORANDUI•I TO: Cindy Houben, Planning Off ice ' � � ` ' '• ' �, � "'-� FROtf: � Bob Nelson, Environmental Health��Z'. � ' �;'`'` �� ' '. , I , , �,,. . EXHIBIT DATE: January 30, 19II5 , � � ��,� ., � �. RE: Cote Employee Dwelling Unit ' '�� - - Lot 6, A�pen River F.anch �9e have conpletec7 our cvaluation of the referenced proposal as it relates to the �vater supply and on-s.ite sewage disposal systems serving these residences. [•,T11TEP. SUPPLY: After di�infection of the well and plumbing system, the drinkiny water has tested bac�eriologically sal-isfactory and me standards. The enclosed sanple forns indicate the tests done for cor,ipliance with r,�inimum orinxing water standards. ��Tater is supplied from a well (Division of Water Resources Permit �95794) �•�tii.ch yields 30 gallons per minute. This quantity should be sufficient to serve tcvo dwellirig units. Inspection af the taell and v�ater distribution system revealed adequate sanitary cons�ruction SEWAGB DISPOSIIL: The existing on-site sewage disposal system installec3 and appraved by this office in 1979 exceeded permit requirements and since the main house F�as modif ied to a t�ao bedroom dtvell ing unit, the current systen, without garbage disposal as built, meets tlie even more stringent 1981 revision� to the P.egulation� on Tndividual Sec�aue Disposal Systems e�hich would required a mininum af a 1250 gallon septic tank and 1500 square feet of soil absorption system. A copy of the drawing of t'Yie existing system and permit is attached. . RFr;/co/Cote 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado B'1611 303/925-2020 � EXHIBIT UNSUITABLE❑ � � STANDARO dACTERIOtOGICAI WATER 7EST FUH TEST ENOIrMllft 1MAiE11 i tAMRIltION OIi17MCT pESULTS ' r.o.�or stoe EN01NMAtS YIUA6E.C0.�tlU �� '��' '� MEMBMNE FILTER � � Sampb Locatlon z � ��NAME OF UIRECT �^ W � SAMPLE TAKEN:Dl1TE � � TIME , � SUPPLY yERIFIED a o � CHLORINE V COUNIY ' vt�^'SAMPLER ,'�ESIDU � � MG/L 4 � �C MMUNITY SUPPIY ( 1 pOUiINE DIST818UTION SYSTEM SUPPIY y AOJUSTED � � •1 ( �HDN LOMMUNITY ( ►GHECN SAMPLE( )PROLESS WAiER COUNT: COUFONM1100tA1 � � �G , ► ►OTHEP PUBUC ( ►HAW �)GROUNO ( )SURFACf LAURYL SULfATE BROTN Z �" � � �j PRIVl11E ( )SPECUL PUpPOSE SAMPLE � � � � Nr aiE: If ALL INFORMIITION IS OT 5 LIEO,iHE SAMPLE Wlll p� ''y. '" "" BE DI�AR�ED��N 3 � �� e � REMARKS: �C�i��+�j�� 2 � NEiUpN10 BGB O ADDPE55�, ___�- ' M� COIIFORM/t00ML O i �' 1 f 3v .r• �-�� RESUlTS GREATEH TNAN ONE I ` WT�•STA7E,��''��- rr• �Z h i�- COUFDRM PER 100 ML tN01C11TES SEE°EVERSE FQq11ME LIMITAilONS.SAMVIING INSTHUCilONS AHD UEFINITIONS. HON•COMPLIANLE WIiH MINIMUM �- LPB•y�LROsG61Nev.3•791100M ONINKING WATER STANDARDS. ° ° ho x �� c��cyc%�'�� .�i��,� ��'y�„ �6 � UNSUITABLE❑ STANDARD BACTERIOLOGICAI WATER iEST f� � S' �,� FOR tEST sMOwM�sa w��a�rt�noM oar��cr tvf �.D.t01(5700 RESUlTS SMDWM�SS YIU/10E.C0.�1615 y MEMBR�NE fILTER � Sampk Locadon �i �ilc� ' W W ' � DINECT � r NAME OF �� ' � a o SAMVLETAKEN:DAT � � TIM �'ti�SUPPLY � ��`� VERIfIED y ��CHIORINE ,�'- ! . LDUNtY /�«-- SAYVLER ��' � '�11EStDUU MG/L 4 � �GOMMUNITY SUPPLY ( 1 NOUTINE DISTRiBUTION SYS7EM SUPPLY y �+ ' AAIUSTED y M .n l 1 NON LOMMUNITY x)CHECK-S�AM�PIE( )PROCE55 WATEp COUNT: COIIFORM/100 Ml � � ( )OTHEp MIBLIC � )RAW � /�GROUND ( ►SUNFACE LAURYL SULFATE BROTM 2 I� �i � PRiVatE �f�1 SPECUL PU SE SAIAPLE cy \ � � � � "NCE: IF tll INfORMAiIOH IS N�T�PPLIED.THE SAMPLE WILL p� '� "" `1 sE u�sc��6 NEL50N 3�;�� flEMARKS: {B � ` � ASPEN/PlTKIPE NEiUpN TO��y 8GB � rt; � Ji�� MPN COIIFOHM/100M1 � � N ADO�e55 �nn C� l�a��A BESULTS GHEATER THAN ONE •� - Lii'+•SiAiE e��Fnte-c�'n 81611 COLIFORM PER 100 Ml IN01CAiES ` SEE�iVENS:fON 71ME L�MITAT�oNS.SAMPLING INSTHUCTIONS ANO UEfINIilONS. NOM•COMPIIANCE WITH MINIMUM " LPB•41CR0 t�(Rev.3•79)t00M Of11NKING WATER STANOANOS. o 0 r:al,r,� o� r,o. cn:-�,;•�,°:, ��x rlTxzt� co. r;:vii� �;,�o EXHIBIT T0: Soard of County Commissioners sui,jcc � '_.=:h. Ii� FROM: Cindy Houben, Planning Office - RE: Timroth/Allison (East Sopris Creek Road) Road Vacation DATE: February 11, 1985 ______________��__°__-___________________-________________________--__ This application was sub�nitted to us by Jim Reeser of Alpine Surveys and seeks to correct a survey error on East Sopris Creek Road. The right-of-way which was dedicated for East Sopris Creek Road is not consistent with the actual location of the road as built. The purpose of this road vacation is to vacate the right-of-way along the aligrnnent where the road does not exist and to dedicate in lieu thereof, that rfght-of-i:ay shown as its "true Iocation.° The Engineering Office has concluded that the proposal is entirely reasonable and comment and recommend approval of the vacatfon and acceptance of the right-of-way as propase d. PLAPNIN6 OFFICS AAD PLllPNING AND SaHING COMlsI&SI� RBCOM!lSHL11,TIOA: The Planning Office and Planning and Zoning Commission concur with the Engineering OEfice and recommend your approval of the vacation and acceptance of the right-of-way as proposed. iq, - � �T . . � . _ . . ' � '_—___--_"__'� . . � . . ' . . ��____________"\ � �\ . � . . . . . ' _ ��'�� \ �\ \�� . . . _ ' � . .' � .. . � . ��R M ��,\\ � 1 � � . . ,�` ^_eqR��s, � �LLISOGI _ . .,.� ��'�'��\`p�r'�. . . . . ��. \"�;a� � _ __� � - � . �� _` -�� ,.,. �\ � T[R�Q3dTCi '� . ...� '�� .\ . � � . . � . ' ' �'�'.�,``` - � ' � � . . . . - . . � � ��,;�. . . . , ��, � . ' . . . _..« :41 �n�.�+� � _ � I J .i ID � _ m m i§ ,f SUHrE7DR'y CERT'IplC4TE . . ' . .-. _"_—_—__—_ 3p "a � � . -...�;.�....e.. ...� ..e.�. . 37 ffi � � I a..�.... "'� . I� T�MNSHIP$SOLT7H.RRYGE 86 W7S7 - . - 87H.PR[RC[RL YCB7LiAF � f —' —_ NPMslue�,s a�rqr e..� . srw..enana..u.c...�:>.x. �fAUN WMRIOIivOF1MA�� TIMIOiN N :•••.•. .••..-• .• i�tlNl�is�Miw! - � c�-�� -� � PUBLIC COMMENT �� / �- �� 2.11.85 PUBLIC CONY�NT EXHIBIT J �a�z��'d'��•�-°,c..�, �- � � ��,�� . c,.�d-�. • � � . �� - .. _ �� , �U�gl�/� . �--��,t ca-,M-��` � C Di��t T� ° � c�-�� S��'/DK �� "�`� �j ��`�' � � . � ��. � �� .�-�:-� � �� .��. � ;�-�- :,e� , �� "..�-c�—, �� -� ��^=u-.�-��. �x-��- .: .,��- � � � .��-�: �'.� .w-�-�e� .,�'?-� .-� � � � _ o� ..t=� e-� � �� o -��1 ^ � �� . � � _�-� - , �-�--� .� `�:� � �— c�—e— � � � .,��:�- � e�-�-� `�. � � �� :� �� -� ,c.�-�� a�.�,.-�- � c�" 7 �, , � , �, v,•� .�� :�-� .. . � � � � � a'�� c.�.sz_ .� � n �� Q,(�• ,d.oy„�� .,i.a.�.� � �t�+-�-�'-� ,�cru-�='r� �.(:-�. .�.ax..E._. �O .��c.c.�„�.V` �Lt�G�L Gv�' �k-G� ��-d,G"�� _ � .� _ . ,c(.{,�G�� l�L-�. .G�-�'-� � � �� C� ��-�� ) / r `�i'� G . � `�� i�� . : � � , ,. �,: :: . ;� -_ . . . .: .. ..�... . .. . . .: . . ,. . .... ::�. .: �� 4: �.- . i • ; The Aspea Times � yor,r,n oF co. ce:::,��rc�� BOX E pITKIN C0. Publio Hearin� �::'ail;its Aspen, Colorado Date ; 2.11.85 Subjcct . �R.............. PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ) COP�/ Of NOtICA ) se. County of Pflkin ) BEi wEXWEit WT SPUr cENEw�1.sttsl�sl3 810N' NOTICB IS HEREBY GIVEN thN a publie hellrinRwi116eMeWonFebru� 11.1985.�tt0:00 William R. Dunawa °'��r��,��- ' I, Y do solemNy se�ear that sionendPAlcinCouMy.coia.ao,inu�ecommis� - slopers'matio8 Rrom.608 E 1Nain Street.Aspen 'Co b rn�uider�n�ppllnlfon�uMnitted by P u b 1 i s h e r 1,eaif�e:ner,reyuati nenl wbmiadon I am the of THE ASPEN TIMES; ,n�ro�eAed�.u�nor��`aeee�dkedfotRe • that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, � •��d��adfor 'Red Mountain t b Ikd Mauntaiin ? and publlshed in the County of Pltkin, State of Colorado, and has R.ecb.oa•eo.ex��uinSubdivldoaThe : a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been pub- {e��ioii�`o��"ain�.7��.enatqiz"�Oto�ow�s�in ' ,�s kees.- llshed continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitliin, ; Fm fu�ther iafam�tlan,aontxt the Pl�nni for a perlod of more than fitty-two conseculive w�eeks next prior �y��"��0�0�Oeiell's�'- to the first pubtication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- � �e��xim�ey.Ch.irmnn ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States ' �otR►�a��e�y�na maIls as second-class matter under ihe provisions of the Act of �blished In 1he Aepen Timn Janwry 10.�eas.,. Marcb 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news• � ' paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. Thot the annexed lega3 notice or advertisement was published � in the regular and enllre issue of every� number of said weekly newspaper for the perlad of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said . newspaper dated J a n u a ry 10 q,D., 19 8 5 and that the laat publication of said notice was in the issue of said news- paper dated A.D., 19_ � / p��' Subscribed and sworn to betore me,.a notary public in and for the County of Pltkin, State of Colorado, this ��_day of A.D., 19� ��42�� Notary Public My commission expires � � . � � The Aspea Times � ' r:;:_�� c._� r.o, r : . : :.�, Box E r�.•:r;I;r cr. Pu'�lic IIcar_.::� ;.. Aspen, Colorado '� �' , ��to . 2.11.85 - -•._._...__........... ......... �ub�;,ct ; TIMRCYIH/ALLISON PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF GOLORADO ) COP�I Of NOtIC@ ) �. County of Pltkin ) ""'�— - �-- -. _. . PUBLIC NOTICE . �RE:`TMR07'tLALLLSON ROAD VACATIUN'� ; ; •N07'ICB 13.HERIiBY CIVFPI'.tlula puAlir; I, Will iam R�. Dunaway .n�a�.�u�n..w�F�,� ».��es.at,10:3Q do solemnly sK ear that .o�oet,wt,hcfore the gas�d o�fCounty Cammi�.• ' �sianenofpilklnCaunty.Cobndo,iatLeCoe�mi�. PUU11 SIl2L' t1O"°'�MK��R�.�EMalnStrea�t: e, I am the of THE ASPEN TIMES� �!0��°•��eneppliee�lnwbmitt�by 7'om 7imroth�end Alfred Alii �io t6e that the same is a weekly newspapec printed, in whole or in part, ��+�0n��ryeh��.ay■�oag� �3apriiCreekRarlwhiehrasenuncowlr laued,: and publfahed in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has andtodedieate,inlieuthereef,lfie'ri e-�:va m a eneral circulation therein• that said newspaper has been i4��u�ata��se s�r;.c�,e�et�po,a�, B . Pub' Far Port6n io(orpuLiun.mntact the Planni liahed continuousiy and uninterru tedl in said Count of Pitkin, �a.�9osc,k�.,,�n,c,to�eie»i� P Y Y 9z6-zo2D:eat 2B:t.:;� far a perlod of more than fifty-two consecuti��e weeks next prioT • ' �Miehacl K�ne1q,ch.irm.n .':�BoaYd of Count Commirioners to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- � �� ` arRe�t�CCo��ty,cotor.do ment; that said nex�spaper has been addmitted to the UTItC(I SLB�CS ��1°ue Aspen�mesJenuary 10,�ees.. mails as second-class matter under lhe provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that safd news- paper is a weekly newspaper duly quaiified for publishing legal notices and advertisements with the meaning oi the laws of the State of Colorado. Thgt the annexed legdl nut:ce or advertisement w�as published in the regular and entire issue of every� number of said weekly newspaper for the period of 1 consecutiva insertions; end that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated J a n u a r y 10 A.D., 198 5 and that the laat publicatlon ot said notice was in the issue of said news- paper dated A.D., 19_ i / � Subscribed and sx�orn to before me,.a notary public in and for the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, this _��, day of / A.D., 19 S Notary Publlc i My commission expires ��