HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.min.reg.07081985 . ' y�,-
;..-�
���'' "�� �s`� �� '� � �.. �
a ti ` _."�3 � e i �� `''i.
��
i4*� r�� :��, s� �_. � � s�'"�'.
t_�Y �yy ;?,. Y�� ���]' { �.� K � . - �� � ..
iP �,� g�9�.'
� j' :J� '�f . -t3�f�`�s^�i «.s.`�i.r5-' :si:✓..�-.. 'r4 - . ._ ._ .... .. ....w�'�:{'y'1�f9�-4`
1.
�oARU OP �G�ui7�Y COHMIS520NEIt5 AG�N4A
8 sULY, 1985
9:00 a.m. �xecutive 5ession - LiEi�atio» - G�ry �sary, As�istant
County Attorney
9:2C1 �ormal Appointment of bistrict ii �v�C Hemb��
LANO US�
;
§e�0 5unny Park North ScibBivigion �x�mptlon - Cind;� !'.ouban. Pianning
hsa5 7'hr�m li)dl �pe�i�l ttevicv - Cindy Houb�n
�
3 10:tl0 Publie Neecing - LUC A�en�� Pubii� xnn� Di�triet = Alan
� Ri�hman, t►1�nning
A
10:30 Pubite Nearing - Asp�?n Community 5�hna1 Speefel R�vi�ew/GMp
Examp��on/5ubdivi�ion Exemhtion - Cincty Noub�n
11:00 LUC Nnend� EmQrg�ney A�option oE Specit►1 R�viaw/SatQiltEe
�ish and LoE SpilE Rmendments - Cindy Nouben
� 11r15 i�u�lic M�etin� Con�in+��d � Edwards Empioye� tK+�iltrt� Unit -
j Ctndy iloubcan
� 11e30 �ublic itearing Con�inucd - Elk Nountain 4odgo. Sgeclal
� Revi@w - Cindy Mauban
11:35 Ruedl Soutb Shorae Su�aivlaion Improv@m�nE� Aqrecncnt �
� Am�ndtnQt�E - Clndy ilouban
]WMIN3STRNTION
� 11:45 Soeisl Servicao - FI�k@ S�hultz, Social SQ�vicea Director
,;• i �ag�a/A �k n Food SEam� Contract
w.,� Ca9� M�nagQmant Ag@nay DesignaEion
: ,, �2e00 Luneh Break
1c30 p.m. Aubli� Comment
1sAS Resolutivns and Co�traets
Manutes
Swa��s Subdavision �x�mpfC�on - Cindy Hoaben
pelise Suhdivisio� �xemption - Cindy Houben
Harnskadt Subdivision Exe�kipn - Ci�dy Noub�n
Ha�ntain Valley Sutndivssion �xemption - Cindy Houben
Canyctn Cable Proaect I 6 II Final Plat - Cindy Hou4en
Quilding Department 4ease Agreement - Jim Wi�.son, Chie�
Suilding Official .
Hcl.ai� Flats Road Contract Award/Right-of-Way Agreements -
Bud &ylar, Public Works Director ;
-' %� Cpmmupity CepteT Sewer Line Replacement - Jim Belfont, !
t
,:�=�, , Ruilding Maintenance Director
��; ASpen Base Operation Lease Addendum - Dick Arnold,
`'�•� Airport Manager
�Y' Mills Land Exchange Release Agreement - Gary Esary
_,.�,;``: MAA Cortununity Center Kitchen License - Gary Esary/Jim Adamski
=�°�- Veterans Officer Position - Pat Belfont
�,.
`;�; 2:15 Public Hearing - Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Recreation District
��-� Service Plan - Craig Ward
, 'C¢i tiEwF�.
-'�=`^�' 3:15 Public Hearing - Amendment to Airport Rules & Regulations,
Unicorn Balloon Curfew Extension - Dick Arnold
- 3:30 Board of Equalization - Darothy Mikkelsen, County Assessor
� = Petitions for Real Property Assessments
3:35 Tailwinds Ltd., Retail Fuel Sales - Dick Arnold
=�ir
��'�= 4:30 1984 Financial Report - Tom O}:eii, Pinance Dir�ctnr
_. ..,»�.�«��:s...,,,...�. ,.,�..»,..._a.�. � ,t�... ,,..
� .�,�:
�-
�r?.��.- -�`_ * �:j 5 a . �' ---
-��,.-�..
^"L� , �� �.t; .�g,� � w'� t�,+� ��� ���!r `-yrr'�'"i .
_��' �"`� , • �e-„-' - � � �,' �T.. #t4"3�`�;..`'F' -.�r . .
�. • .. � '� :�.a�• ', .. .,�.d..,.
PZTKIN ODUNTY
• Shc1RD OF WMMYSSIONBRS
RFx`L�L.NR HFP.TiNG 8 Jtl1.Y. 1985
PR�SEtJTs TltOMJ1S BtAKE. ROBERT W C112LD. NELEN KLMIDERtlO� GEJORGB l41Q86N,
DOB RRIIUDL3
3unay slanner Cindy Nouben introduceed tho Sueny Park North/Hollie
Park Cibso� Park Subdfvialon 6xempeion appl[cation, a requeat Eor
Nocth exempeion lrom ths deEinilion o! subdivlaion pursuane ro 5ections
Subdiv �-2.x(21 and 4-2.2(�1 0! the Codc. The npplicatloe waa aubmitted
Bxempt by the County to provida Eor the creation of the Mollie Gibaoa
Park uiluated adiace�t to and uast oE the Ce�Cennlal Project, The
Ptoject vaa aituatecl on a twonty-Eouc and nlne tenEhe (24.9) aero
paccel ot land, of uhicb app�oximately aeventeen t17) acres was
dasiq�ated for devo3oPraentt tbe cemainl�g seven ancl nine tenths
(7.9f acres waa desig�atrd for park pucpotsas at the time thae the
Cenee�nial Project woa appcoved. The aPpllcant ceyuested a�
exwnptian fram the clefinitian aF subdivision for Ehe purpoae af
crQaeing the sepacato seven anci nine teaths f7.91 acre pnrcel
epeciF#cally to craAte the 1�iallio Gibson Pack, In addition, the
a�plicant reqoeatad An exomptlon Eoc a lot line adjustment
! between the Pesrk and Got Seven t7) of the Sunny Pa�k Norfh
Subdivisionr the adjustme�t cequasted would deduct approxlm�tely
� six thousand. nine hu�dred (6,900) square feet of la�d from the
Park parcel to be ad8ed to 4ot Seven f7). This adjustment waa
propoaed as the City oE Aspen, the ovaer of the Got, has aqreed to
' deduct aa identical amount of square footage fro� Che Lot £ot the
pucpose of creatinq a rigbt-of-way for Smugglec Hountain Road.
Hoth exemptions complied with Code criteria; the £ormer would
create a cocwunity �acility and the latter woold not result in an
incsease in the size of the Lot nor create more thas tl:e ori9inal
number of parcels. 'rbe Planning Office recommended apptoval
subject to the following condition:
1. that a plat be recprded in the Clerk and Recordec's
OfPice and that the plat be revieved and approved by
' the County Atto[nPy prior to recordation. The title oE
� the plat shall indicate both subdivision exemptions
� Child moved to approve the application subject to the one
, . (1) candition recited above, Braudis seconded and the motion
passed unanimously.
Throm Cindy Houben introduced the Throm 1041 Special Review
= 1041 application, a ptoposal to develop a single family residence on
� Special lands containing geologic hazards and to construct a bridge to
:�;v ._' :;
�--:::-. Review access the residence within the one hundred (lOQ) year floodplain.
�i:r�°;i = The subject property was a pre-existing thirty-five (35) acre lot
'x`'�< situated in the Snowmass Creek Valley approximately ten {20)
'�:tr miles south of the Snowmass Conoco in the RS-30 PUD Zone nistrict.
�.� ' �
��rt+�� Commissioner's Meeting 8 July, 1985 - 1
- � �;-
�,��"� j:,,.�.: � y7� �k y, �"''u„'+i;-
.�t -� ,�ir .« .�r i-yl'K'� _�: X '£�` .
� �'� �`���e :
r .�y
'�� "r � ��� � " '��#b t ,.:: �� ��5,.^'<?� �tc��'c�Y r�
. `�F�"�`�'4`^�^y`r . � .-�-.�8`a.t4d'er�..^_..... ......�:#:.»:ar'-�.:A:. g'' _. . -`��dW.�.,+t� •+.�-w .
Rtfe[cal connnents �rere generally suppottfvES the bivision of
{�later Resoucces has agreed to issue a domestic well permit for
the new residence, the Enviconmental Nealth Department das
ittdicated that the subject property can accor,aaodate a conventianal
wasteWatec dispvsal system and the County Engineering Depactm�nt
addressed floodplain concerns. rh� Environmental Coocdinator
tecommended thaC the access road be r�located to thQ sfOtCh so
that significant cut and fill wouid not be necessary, and that s
Pisherman's acceus easement be dedicated.
r8e epplication uas teviewed by ehe Blanning and 2oning
Connission ducing a publfc hearing on 22 Apcli, 1985. mhe Cnnmis�ion
addcesgeJ th� 1041 geoloqic hazard concerna and eatabliahed
adequate mitigatfon techniqu�� purgnan� to Code provigiong
delegatfnq finel authority on t�i� fsAUe to the Cammiegion. The
�, a�plicatiort was arheduled for Board revicw as Einal auihority on
floodplatn iueatu was d�legated Co the Boacd. The Plaaning and
2oning Comaission recommended approval of tho application aubjace
to the follo+ring aQVen (7) eondi�tan�s
1• conforman�Q with ehe floodplain cequlatlona, section
5-�02.2 oE che Land Uae Code. Final epproval Eoc ther
homesite aha�l be coniingent on thQ Eindioy lhaC by tha
BOCC that the appticant can mca� thc lloodplain raquicw
menta and can mttig�te water qualiey pcoblame asaoclatod
wlth conntcuttion oE thc bridge as outlined in rhQ mamo
Erom the Environ�+entai fiaolth Depar�mQnt datod 15 Hsy,
1985
2, the accQaa roAd to tho aite shall he developad in
accordanae vith the euggeetion a�ade by Nick l.ampiria in
his lctter clatad la March, 1985, and thQ attachod mop
3. the dwelling shall be located witbia tho eovclope as '
i�dlaatecl on tbe plat submitted vith tbe application
4. prior to tbe tssuanee ot n building permie, a stte
speciFlc eoils study shAil ba done by A proEessional,
cnc�irtear to insu�e pcopar foundatton das3gn
• � S. �rior to lssuanca of a building pecmit, the applicant
sha12 obtaln a wall pecmit (toc the spring) t'com the
Divisian of water Resonrces
6. the appliCant shall obtaln a drivevay access permit
f�om the Caunty engineer pciar ta the issuance of a
building pecmit
7, hhe applicant sha21 desi9nate a fishing easement within
the water of Soowmass Creek and a minimum at five (5)
feet above high water line. This easement shall be
noted on the plat and be submitted to the Planning
Office prior to issuance of a building permit
� - The Planniag office cecommended a�ptoval subject to the seven (7)
- conditions of the Planning Cosunission as secited above and as
amended below:
1, the applicant shall mitigate any water quality problems
- associated with the construction of the bridge as
outlined by the Environmental Health Depattment memo
=^=-��-`" �' dated 15 May, 1985
�<:,,
� -:1 = Rouben explained that the application submitted for Board review
+�_>'' := today was not published; the public hearing befoce the Planning
= Commission was publist►ed and it was felt that interested parties
�>=s,�� were provided the opportunity to comment on the application at
:,��,�:-:�; that time. The BoaLd should formally waive the public hearing
��� requirement foc today's review ott this basis.
�-.,,,-,
��t�'r'��a� Commissionec's Fieeting 8 July, 1985 - 2
��
�e-���°.'� .
.-x'.:
1�fi`i f t"
. " -.. 'iy�tY�! h� �..♦
t a�}i �
.. . �'� .. . {� y �
x �. k
Y-`.�s ` -. .� ••r�y :r- � 1'�i�M�����T .�F ` i. �" � a'+ .
. ".;#�•x 'k e�*.:.i�.. .��k:...e'.-saata�-Mi�a�...�„e'.... �r,�:eyiqk�hr-:. ti.: �-.s.. y
!�W�:�*+ti�.r.*. .
APplicant Phyllis TAtom explained that ihe subjecC pcoperty
was lacated in the Sno�mass Creek Valley between the Haon Ru»
Ftanch and the old 5no�tmass Iodge, The property pcop�vsed for
dpvelopmer►t was one (1) of four (4) thirty-five (35) acre tcacts
thet was subdivided in the late 1960's.
Ghild noted that the Engineecing bepatCment revieved thp
application �nd not�d that the bridge was not long enough to span
the onr hundred I100) ye�r floodpiain events the bridge was tu be
rongtructed ae � iength oE gixty-five (G51 feet wher�as Ehe
flondplain span Wag approxlr.,�te1y elyhty-five (85) feet. Pae
Dnbie, a pcivate engineer repre�enti»g th� applicant, exp2afned
that the cevi�w crtterium loc coostruCtion in a floodplain aas
that such not impact any adjarcnt propecties. in this ingtanCe,
. the rivpc channel ituelE Wa� appcoxitnately farey-five C45) feee
• tn Width, che flaodpl�in wfdth was a�proxfmt�tely etghty-five (8S)
Eeee ahereas the span of the bridge Would appcoximate sixry-Eive
!65> feet. The applicant ha� reviewed engtneeced plana Eor tNe
bridg� and has appcnv�d the stcuctnce es propospd, Dobi@ explain�d
thet a barkwater analyais wds olao prepared and thae th� only
tiwe a problem woo2d oraur was during the one hundted t100) year
l�loodplain events during auch an Qv�ne, it vos exhected eba�
rha river woutd riae a maximua► oE orta (1? Eoot beyond ito normal
Elow holght, pob[es stated eMat ehe ono hundr@d �100) yoac f�oodplain
evQnt would not arlversciy atfect thQ bridge atcucture ita�alE an�
that 1t would not reeauit [n any impact on ad�acent prop@rtios, in
which caao Code cricerto [oc Pioodplal� conatruceton han bee�
conplicd with.
Hadsen movud �o approve che appllcatlon aubject eo tbo sevon
t7) condttions cecon�enclad !�y the Planning 9ltice and to watvo
thQ Public hearirtg requLcemQnb Eoi today'a �ovtaw o� the baele
that a public heartnq vas ocbodulod and co�dut�etd by the P2anning
and Zoning Commission. Klandarud aeconded and tbe mot�on passed
unan iv►ous ly.
Public Thc qoard convenQd a public hcaring to conaides on second
Rearing reading a PcoPosed ruaend+nant to the 1.and use Coclo coneec�i�g the
LUC Publlc tone Dtstrict. Planning Airactor Alan Rtctunan sub�attted to
Amend: the record tbe Alanning Ottice necno of x4 June, 2485, and the
aub2lc Land U�e Code as amended to dAte, The subject Diserict was [irst
Zone adapted i� 19s3 at a ti�e vhen there was no district thAt cauld
uistrict accoawodate public use�r tb� Roard Eound chak �a new diskrict �as -
Rmend needed both becauae pE the unigue nature a�d variaty of public
uses and to pcovide a long range planning taol �or such uses, a�d
on this basis the Public zone pistrick r+as established. The Public
Zone has not functioned as intended since its adoption in 1983
as tbB use tahles was not sufficientiy broad and as special revie�
aPprovai for each such use expired vithin one (1) year. The
amendment submitted for 8oard review today vould achieve the
following:
' _ 1, redefine the iptent of the Public nistrict
f �
- ` 2, amend tbe use table to 6roaden those uses allowed har
�' rigbt or special ceview in the subject District
3. establish five (5) review standards with which all
public uses must comply
_ - 4. define qrawth management criteria foc aIl public uses
�`-�"�.':;" 5. provide a master plan option for applicants seeking
-- =- relief from the limitations of special review
�',_�-.'r- •'' all as recited on first reading. It was anticipated that, subsequent
'""�==� to the ado tion of the amendment, cectain existin
:�;���, p g public facilities
�3..,,
'-i':rMC�S::
;{,;�t.�„�! Commissioner's Meeting 8 July, 19B5 - 3
*�
����
_ .TW��:.
,_ :;,,..1 i
�;_.
' __ c',vn�y crr4"i,�R.'�'!'K.��.• .. ..�m.<-...w'. a .. 'i .ya.....r`r'�����.���i�i s�.s.
would be rezoned to Public; the Aspen Va11ey Hospital bistcict,
foc fnstance, has already submitted a cequest fot the rezoning of
the Castle Creek campus. Richman recomnended that existing
non-complying publfc facilities, such as the Bus Haintenance
Yacility, be tezoned this year Whereas the remainfng factlities
could be addressed on a long term basis.
Blake then opened the heacing for public comment. Aspen
Valley Hospital DisCCict board m�mbet Russ Pielgcick was very
supportive oF the amendr,,ent as propoged.
Aicpoct piannec Calette Penne expcessed some concern with
the groNih manegem�nt procedutea chat wonld app2y tn public
prd�ectat le wag indicated, for ingtance, that esaenciai publiC
�BCiliCiBg may obtain � GFtP exemption whereas accps�ncy oc
neressary celated facilicieg would likely be �ubject to gcnwth
manahemgnt competition. Thlu procedure would require tha! en
airport restaurant comhete with an aicport hangar, Eort inatanre,
for an alloaation. 7'heae two t21 Eacilities, both oE ah[�h w�re
consideced necessary and accesnory, were very diEEerent in
ttature and it uaa noc known nn what basis th�a ra�apetilion woutd
oecuc.
Richman axplAlned enat thtu proaeducs was SntQndod to
provide Eor an exempGion only upon a flndinq tltat a pro etet wA8
eithor an Qasenela� publie Eactlity oc aceeasory/necessary eo
such A Eaclllsyi all otbor ArojQCta would be raquired to compete
Eor a dQVClopmcrne allocotton prior to opprovol. Rictuaon felt chat
ao aicpoct cestaurant was nQCOasacy !oc a publlc airpore, !n wbich
caae tt would bo exemp! fcom g[ONCIt managemo�t. NQ agceod eo
submiC thia ptocoduce �to the County Ateocnay fo� ceview prior to
third reading.
Chlld expresaed some concocn that !he moster plan optio�
pcovidod an appitcant wtth tha oppoctunity to proporso use� !n
the Public 2ooe not othacvisQ icieaetEtad in thQ asQ table.
Riclunt�n explained that tbia oPtion vas intentionaliy providad so
that a Code amendment ++ould noE ba requiccd foc each use �ot
lcic�tified tn khe band Use Code,
Child noted chat employae housinq was ganorally allovad in
most ao�e distcict$s it was tndicated, howeve�, that mobile bomos,
' �aabtle hame parka. prefab and mQdulac homas were ail prohibitad
usas within the Aublic Eone. Ricbman explained that employae
housing within the Public zvne would bB limited only to on-site
housing asaociated vikh the publie user as tbis cauld include
mabile homes and mabile bome parks, as we12 as prefab n�d mo8ular
hotaes, he ag�eed to amend the use table Co ir�dicate khat these
facilities ►nay be permitted by spectal review only for housE�g
employees oE the public use.
Klanderud noted that additional dwelling units we�e pcobibited
r+ithin the Public zone whereas other employee housing facilities
may be allowed by special review. The use tab2e rras felt to be
somewhat contcadictory in that certain employee housing facilities
vould be allowed within the subject district wheceas others wou2d
- nat. Richman explained that additional dwelling units wece
- specifically intended to address bandit units, in which case this
use would not apply to the Public Zone.
Klanderud expressed some concern that a variety of agricaltural
• nses, such as grazing, animal husbandry, crop production and other
similar uses were all allowed by right vithin the Public Zone.
Richman exp2ained that most agricultural uses would be allowed
within the subject zone specificalZy to accommodate existing
- agriculturat uses; it was felt, for instance, that, in the event
- the public sector pucchased a ranch property, most of the existing
- agricuZiural uses on that property should be allowed to continue.
�:=`-'"�"'�' Klanderud expressed some concern that nurseries were identified
�� : �`
�".-' Coromissioner's Meeting 8 July, 1985 - 4
.Y'_
1-i;.s_`%'�^
��• •
�� ��
� ��
,....,.. a.w�e..ra+m...�..,. ........ .. .....,-a.,,-.nrrm 4naTkY+�N �... .r;.'�_
, ��'
� n � � ,
��= � ,•� �
{1. � .. t.�* � •S \ �'�� i-
. ._, S{'F ��.�,: . . ,,�.� - k � 4•a���- j. ii�..+
;'�` ��. =��. �"�r,��-�'.� � � �`;. '�„�:;,.;�.;" �:�,. "3�''� r � •
..`r4s"`z'�&t�'ei�e+is...<��._ . .. .+5..�. .i'a�.:w-di..««. �
as a use allowed by rfght aithin the Zone in lieu of by special
ceviea, Richman explained rhat nurseries ailowed pursuant to
this pcovision would be limited to stock and ptoduction whereas
retai2 and sales would be ptohibited. Fie agreed tAat this use
should be subject Eo special reviea and to amend the use table
accordingly.
Klanderud also notpd that private schonlg and univprsitles
were prohibited uses within the Public Zone; as these facilities
n�y setve a pnblic use, it Waa �ot known why they would be
inappcapciate in che subfprt Uistrict. Richman pxplaingd rhat uBgs
that wer� avai]able to thp qeneral public oc dpccaLed for ehe
benefit of the pub�ic Wece genecal2y ttot prohibited withln Che
DigtciCtt a private school that wes sv�ilaDle �a th� public would
itkely nnt be ptnhibited in the public zone. in an efEoct to
clarlFy the lntenr nf ihe 2ooe, he anggested an amendment to the
uae table to indi�ate that private schoola and unive�gities
snay be pecmittad by �pecfal r@v�ew in the Diatrict rathec than
simply prohibited.
elake the� agked for additional coaunents� tbere being none.
the haaring waa eloaed.
Kianderud moved to approvQ the amondmcnt on aecond readSng
subjeet to thee Eollovinq changera to the use tabloi
a. Soceion 3-1.8 private achoolss and univorgitiQa would bo
SdoneiflQd as apoclal cavlew, rath@c �han prohlbiked,
usca ;n khQ Publlc 7.one
b, S�eclion 3-1.37 Nobilc� homQa and mob11Q homQ pnrks vould
bo idontLftQd as a spocial ravtau uee in the Publlc Zone
only tar Aousiag !or ewployees of tbe public use
c. Section �-3.29 Aretnb homos, a+odular homes, assembly-
room-�izc or largeR componente reguiri�g building code
exceptians xould be 3dentifiad as a a�ecial roview une
in the Publtc xono only Eor Aousing ior omployees aE
the public use
d. Scction �-3.3q Crop productlon, orchards, nocsecies,
Elowec �roduction and Forest laadf pastu�e e�d gcaaing
land would be idontifLed as apecial ceviow, rathe[ than
allo�+ed, uses in tAc Public zona
e. Seckion �-3.31 Animnl psoductions hus4andry service Inot
including commercial �eed lots) aod athec fa[m and
agrfcultucal uses r+ould be ide�tified as special
review, rathe� than allowed, usea in the Public Zoae
Madsen seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
Public The Board convened a public hearing to consider the Aspen
Hearing: Community School, a special review, 1041 vildZif e speaial reviev,
_ - • Aspen subdivision exemption and Gravth Ptanagement exemption a�plicatlon,
- Comm Ci�dy Hauben submitted to khe record the Plantting Office Qemo of
School 8 July, 1985, the complete application, and the Land Use Code as
- amended to date. The suhject property consisted of forty (40] acces
of land situated in the woody Czeek Valley in the RS-20 PUb Zone
- District aed contained a six thousand, two hundred (6,200) square
;��"=�:- ::' foot school building, a three hundred and twenty (320) square
- POOt mvsic dome, a nine hundred and sixty (960) square foot
�:''��*�=V � storage building and a two thousand, seven hundred and sixty
J`'" P= ' (2,�60) square foot outdoor as halt
�*�>_'; .: ' p playing area. The remainder
° '; of the property consisted of approximately seven t7) acres of
'"` �� .y playing area and gardens and thirty-two (32) acres of farmed
r�:_g1 land, The applicant has requested approva2 for the following:
�.� :-
�.�i��c.�'�
�=' }:1 Commissioner's Meeting 8 July, 1985 - 5
� .1
'�':.a�,
�
- �..._..�
� - . .�,_
er �
-"it.� - i . . � _ �s.F ���,`3+'�r+°-'��"���;a`����'$.,r}..,
.u,..... �... :::�>+`i�" . '��w-.a� .R.. �, :-.`JiY' .'�_`''+�t?",���a�n„`�-'ti.�--�—�� 4 5 .
_ yE . - '�.,, .
A. d subdiVision exemptioa to pcovide foc the, creation af
the forty (90) acre paccpl. The subject propecty Nas
own�ed by G�orge 5tranahan Hhv h�s aqreed to donat� the
parcel tn the 5chool. An exenpCion frum the definition
of subdivision foC the cLeation oF a coauaunity facility
was necessacy to seoarate th� s�bject forty (40) acres
fro� the cenair►der of the Sttanahan p[opecty. dnce
separated, thirty�tyo t32) acres c�ould be lfmieed to
agricul�uralJfac;�ing pur;�oses so thaL only eight
(8) ��chs Hould be u�ed fvc srhvol develo�en�
[3. a c�routh snanagcr�ent exe7peion �+as requ�sted ro providr
fc+r th� construction of trie Folinwlnq addiCionai
iEaciliti��:
1, a six ihou�and, seven hundr�td (6,70Q) �guat� fonti
�rraacultur�/��ienr� E�c121ty, to be rbnstructa�
� a� a neH Nfng ta the original uchnol bui2ding.
'Chis ne� f�rilir}; Nnul�t pt���lde �c►t ne�etinK ariaCe,
a i�u»�;c, qrernhc�uc�e, oE�irE space, oEotagc ar�a,
labnratory, l�zartsre acea, aockshop �nd o fivn
hundceci scjuace �oot {500} rn�loyre houaing unit.
2. Eout hunclrecl �n�i EiEty (A50) aquare foot raot cellar
3. one thouu5nd, eero hundred (1,200} squace Eoot biodo;sia
4. thrcu hunclre8 an�l rventy (320i suTuace Eoot cooa ahod
5. a ti�cQe t3) aicleri poet and boasn livea�ock ahe�2 oE
an unn�eciPiec! alzg .
6. tuo hunciced (200) :c�uarc foor chickon cocp Y
7. a onc thou�anA, two hunctGacl (�,20Q1 aquare Foot
�leta�he�3 cin�loyaQ housin� untt
All oF the above FAeilitics, FriGh tbe oxcc�tion oE the
� tics�. +�au�cl b�r cAnstructecl in futurQ yoars o� a Eu�d
avallable basia
C. �paciai revictw aPpco+ral rr�s r�uired �or all oE the
. ; proposed uses as none oF the� vera alloacd by r3qht !n
the RS=2Q PUA �ona ui�trict
Q, lOq1 tirfldliFe sPeci31 revie+r was requiced as the
subjeac propecty was a mapped 1091 wildli�a hazard area
ReEercal earaments uece generally :uppartives the Nousinq Authority
recoceaended that the e�ployee housing units he cavenanted to khe
raoderate e�ployee housin9 guidelines, thac occogancy he limited
to qualified enployees. and that condo:niniuc�ization be prohi4ited,
', ' the Enviroqr�enta2 Health Depurtnent addressed wacer and se4�age
disposal syste:� requireraents, corso2iance uith state standards and
�egu2ations for school construction, Eood service and others, and
- _.i khe EAVironnental Coordiqator recor.�aended that a ce[tified soils
;._`=;:_°s`:i stability ana2ysxs 5e conducted and a weed contro2 progtam
X�;� �' imp2emented, The uivision of :tildlife noted that the development
�'�> pcoqram nroposed »ould not ha✓e any significant impacts on the
��;
-^,-���_'r winter range nor interfere with r�igration corridors; the �ivision
a t;,=�;.:= did recoau�end, however, that dogs be prohibiEed on �he property
,;�,�.� ot that a strict kennel coetrol program be imglenented.
�' ��
�s ;=.{ The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed tke application
"``�}-�' at its regular meeting on 4 June, and recommended approval
�'�"� subject to the follor�in five (S) conditions:
_,`-�_;, 4
-.r�:=.,���:i
�i�{�d! 1. Lhat all recommendatioas made by the County Environmental �
�E -� Health Department in the r�emo dated 2I [iay, 1985, to
Ry�''Y_y '
,,M..�n . :
� ' Commissioner's Fieetinq 8 Ju2y, 1985 - 6 '
_��
=�,: -=:�J
*.� . _
. �;.�
„�" . x
, t .,+���+:;. +- � �j':x
�, y f,.
� .
.: j f-, '. ' t X� +4�.� t�*'F .
�� ! � �- }s� ' � � �r f i:.
t ��. �� �- �� - ^�" � 4 �i. � :v 2
. r4.s+�9.-}Rf�.. . .....rr..�+??l+-�-a• ...:r... 1�, ,�r.i.t� .....:.o:2.i� . . F+:`i�:zeex" '# �aF?kat'�.. , ..
the Planning dffice, sha21 be made conditiona of apptaval
Z. that all r�coraaendations made by the Housing Authority
in a mer.�o dated 10 May, I985, shall b� made conditions
of approval
3. that a11 recomm�ndatfons made by ihe County Enviconmentel
Coordinator in his memo dated 29 ttay, 1985, become
cnnditinng of apgcava2
�. ehe applicant ghall �aeisEy ali conditfdns of approvel
prtor e� issu�nce of at►y 6uilding permitg
S. nn dogs shall be al2nwed on the property
KlanBerud guegtioned che basi� Eac thp gravth manag�ment
exemption. tinuben explained that the exemptton could bQ allrnrctd
pursuant to the CciCetta i�lerttified !� 5eetion 5-510.2 (E) and
[hy oE che Code. Ahfu 5ertfnn provideg Eor the exemption from
9cowth manag�ment af rou�munfey facilt[ies $ub#ect to cQrtain
eciterla, includin�a
a. the uae �rovidest �a bas�Se oc Pundamental PuDlic aetvleQ
upon whieh th� rQm�indec eE tho communlCy ia dependene
Eor aupport
b. thQ use !a aval3ablo Eoc use by nc� gQn�ral public
c. the uae pri�acily aecvvs thc local eo�amuniey
Alehough the comtauaity cthooi vaa oot coneldeced a baslc or
funcla�cnkal servtcc Eor the coca�,unity, tho rcmaining two (2)
cciterta were a�piicablv. Subaectlon �l) of the Code ns noted
above Eurthec cxcmpted E�ora growth manngomant tboae projects with
ncgligiblc gcovth im�cta on thc community, Those im�acts ineluded
addltional omNloyooa, parking, trail aad road syotem, watoc/nevec/
police/Eire prokoction servicas. acheol/library/public bu�
servica dlstriete, and chv atc/�rato�/laad/energy cesourcers oC the
coma�unity. In this instAnca� tho tour !4) employeas to be generatad
r►ould ali 4e housed on eitc, np adclitional parkinq demr�nd uould be
�� ccaated na �ig�ifteant roacl or traii impaces wou]d oceur as only
four (4� addit�anal en�ployees wo�ld be 9enerated, water and eavar
uecvicea wouid be Pcovidcd on sire whar@as additianal police and
ff�e pcotection servlces were not ankicipated, the davelopment
would have no impaeC on special distr3cts, and fiaally, the
requested facilities were ezpected to have a negligib2e impact
on tbe cammuaity's cesousces. }louben noted that a somewhat
similar requesk was submitted far the ezPansion a� the Aspen Camp
School for tbe neaf cappus property �ast year; that exemption
fram growth management uas granted on the basis that the tmgcove-
ments p�a sed �epresented a qualitative upgrading of tbe school
in lieu o�an expansion. In 6oth instances. the projects requested
were not intended to pcovide �or ao increase in either student or
faculty populatioqs. Houben noted that che exemption criteria
contained itt this Section were intended to address commercial
� developments althaugh the school was considered neither a cocunercial
_ � nor cor�munity facility, it complied witb the negligible impact
ccitetia established in this Section and on this basis it could
:', _ a be approved.
- : Blake then opened the hearing for public comment; there
being none, the hearing vas closed.
Child moved to appLOVe the application subject Eo the five
� . - (5) conditions of the Planning Commission as cecited ahove.
� " _ liadsen seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
;.�:�<��._- ----------
rr„ ,�„ ,:
>.;,�4 -� LUC Cindy Houben introduced on second reading and for emergency
�:`*� .".
"*�'� �' Commissioner's lteeting 8 July, 1985 - 7
.�, ,;..
;�='�`'"
_ :@TJ.;°`�5�:
. ;��..
C
_"�..�.�t ��. '• �. t .-� .
ki - �:c:j i. � . �� *��'- � "4 � �`. .
.. t _ .x_.7"-'�'+"]'c�ti.:x i.r-..-. ,--•�,. �' t.�+..rw+t^��`f=�r.r+�.r r a".�4- .
Amend: adoption two (2) resolutions amending the Land Use Code concerning
Lot lot splits, specfal tevfea permits and the satellite dish revieW
5plit, procedure. The anendments, appcoved on Eirst readinq on 28 Nay,
5pecial were submitted fot emergency adoption as the cequiced public
TtevfeW notice for all Land Use Code amendments was not achievedj a
Permit, public hearing for both resolutions was ociginally scheduled foc
Satellitp today althouqh public nottce of thP hearing Was not accotnplished.
bish
itouben intcoduced a resolution adopting Code anendments with
regpect Co the revieW proccdures for minor ampndments to 5pecial
Iievicw+ Permits, 5ection 3-6.3(b}, and the review pracedureg for
sate2lite [�d�b ECC'tjUpn�y dlV1CCS� Sertion 6-6.1t�)• Th� cecolution
would adopt two (2) apecific C�►de amendmpnts �s follaws:
A. Sertion 3-6.3(b): �ny pecson vha wish�� to altec a struCture
oz e:�ange a use or m�thod eE operation nE �� activiey gove[ned
by a speciel use pQtmie In a mann�c not provtded fnr by thar
permir gMall fir�t apply to nc� County foc rpvisinn af th�
rsxlgtfng p�rmlt or �or a new npecial use permit. 5uBQtanCial
an►endaipnts to a speeial use permlt shall consticute a ngw
applieation and uhali requ[ce a cQpe�t�ion of eh@ reviQw
proeedurea contalned hecein. Ninor changas to a speeial use
pec�att nay be authocized by the Planning Olcector viChout
additional public revioN. For an ac�ivity tn be deen►ed
minor, it shall be neeQSflaty foc the applicAn�t eo demonatcate
aompiiance srich at1 of tho Eollo►+ing erieerla:
1. activiey dooa not chang@ cho baata characlQC or tho uaQ
of the land oo which tho activity occuu, lecluding ita
baate visual a�peacanee and mothod oE operaelon. Anct,
the acttvlty doQS noe vtolato any policy oc genQral
regulatLon oE �he Pitkin County 4and Uas Code
2. activity Joea not requite the applicant to obtaln any
olher land use per�nit which can not be g�anted by the
Alanni+�y Airactor or t�atlding Inapector
3. activity doe5 not substantially increase tbe naod Eor
on-site pa�king o� utilttlea, or aftcet cm ployoo
housing gcne�atio� o� provisian fa� tho use
9. activity Joas not tncceaue the flooc area oE the usc by
more thaa tao percant f2a) or deerease open spaca on
the sitc by wora than thrae percent (3t)
9. Section 6-6.1(f1 : applieatians Eo� special review foc
satellite �adio frequency signal seception and/or transmission
clavices, pursuant ta Section 3-3.59. Provided, howavec, the
Planninq Director may authocize, without review by the
Planning Commissian, the placement of a sin9le tl) satellite
�adio fcequency signal reception or tcansmissxon device if it
is found to be in conEormance vith the criteria fn section
5-205.2(b) and if it is tbe oply such reception or transmission
device located on the parcel
. Houben explained that the existing review proceduce for special
review permit amendments required the submission of another
application regardless of the extent of the amendment, Tbe .
- resolution submitted for Board �eview today would distinguish
between minor and substantial amendments and would authocize
the Planning Director to approve only rainor amendments. [iith
respect to satellite dishes, existing procedures established a
,_j one (1) step procedure before the Planning and 2oning Commission
-- a foc the approval of all dishes; the amendment proposed would
`� authorize the Planning Director to approve the construction
"''J" ;:�.� of one (1) satellite dish per parcel in the absence of Commission
` ` �' review. These two (2) amenc�nents were intended to both simplify
the ceview procedure and encourage greater compliance with the
i�.� regu2ations. There were a substantial number of sate2lite reception
r '�:- f dishes, foz instance, that were never approved by the Planning
��y
���,.,� Commissioner's lleeting 8 July, 1985 - 8
����
:�:�
_��, f .
�� .;� �
_ �. *
` , y;,.- , . „ '`� -',,' �-..ar� ;, •,��,' _'
-. � ��' .>»+5, � -.� '� �.�•w � �� i�- tr'C` ..
... e s. �>.w.e-'.»-.w.--a�•.:i-.r°s. � ._... t_ rT.�.b�.�...%re•.,..wr,-a�• ,
Commission; as nuch of ihis non-compliance was attrfbuted to the
lenqth and cumbersomeness of the existing process, it was felt
ebaE a sinplified procedure befoce the Plahning Director only
Nould provfde for greater compliance.
tiadsen moved to appcove the resoluCion, Klandecud seconded
and the motion pass�d vith opposition frosn Child, Who hes opposed
the rpg�laeion af satellite re�eptiort dighes sinc� its inapption.
Nouben then introduced a cesolurion adapting Codp ampncknerits
Nith re�p�at io the Pitkin Caunty Code tot Sp11t proviatons�
3pation 9-6(a) and (b). Thin �mendment aas inftiated spc4i�iCally
Cb Cl�eify th� intent of the fifty pprcent (SO'8) denaity reduCtion
8�t� agricultuc�l LOC Spl�� pcnvisions b�I limitinq Cfli2 EO[IIIE![ t0
eligible par�els wi�h cither �n existing aingle f amiiy r�sidencp
oc a gcowth manaq�snent a1loc�aidn. An eligible pacael would be
deEtn�d aa a single Eamlly lot vftb only one (1) prfnaipal
reatdenCei a parcel with tWn (2) �ce�idencee would be in�aligiblh
unlens onc (li of thace chrellings vau de�d r@gt�cceea as mnployee
houslnq. 'Che ahrirultural lnt �p1it �coceduce would b8 amended to
indicate that nm m�ce than nn� il) additional p[incipal ceeidence
wouicl be Allowed hursuant to tbiu pcoceduce. The lsau@ oF mulripie
agricultural lot splits was nor addtecg�d by the Planning Commiesion
au lt was Ee1e tNst otber �xfa!ttng regulattona. inciudtng the
raqu[rement to preservo a rQrtai� �ercentage oE agrlcultural
la�da, would onau�e tho� sueh lande wcrcQ, [n foee, pceatcved
regardieaa of ahQ numbec oE unita pocmittad purauanE Co lhia
proccdure, ouring u jolnt work aeoaton vlth tho Comm�aalon last
wQrk, 1t uaa agroed ehat aqrieulcural lo! epllta would bc limited
to onQ (1) auch dlvlalon only pe►nding Einallzatlon of dovovalloy
mastoc plan eFEorta. ThQ amandmQnt to thta Sectlon waa as follows:
Seceloo 4-b: Annual Reviev oE Sub�ivialon Applicatioas
(I) The annual da�o for tho su�mission ot sulxlivisioo applicatione
in Pitkin County shall be Junc lst, provfded that !n o�der
to meat tha objactivao of Ehe Aspen/Pitki� Counly Growth
llartagema�t Palicy Pla�. subdLvisioa applications ahich
ragulr� ChQ rocript of a grouth managemant allatm@nt mAy ba
aub�+ittad aia+ultannously with the aPpltaatfon lor a grorrtb
a�a�agcc�ent allotmQnC. A publlc �ot�aa that applications are
being accep ted shall be give� no later than one (1) montb
pcioc to tE�a �ato of submission o� applicattons by at 2east
o�e (l) publicatio� in a paper aP general cicculation in
Pitkin Cou�ty.
(2) The atwve requirements hotwitltstanding, any applicatio� Eoc
a subdivision exewptian or $ubdivision approva2 for a lot split
may be submitted and considered at any tima during tbe year.
Poc tha purpose of tbi� Section 4-6, and SBCtion 5-300.3 and
: 5-51Q.2(c1, a lot split is de£iaed as:
(a) the divisio» of a parcel of land, being a part of
an ongoing agricultural operation lying wlthi� the
AF-1, AF-2, RS-20 or RS-30 zone districts wbicb
creakes no more khan one (1) addxtional grincipal
residence, pravided:
- ,'.` i 1, there are adequate guarantees ensuring the
_; prese[vation of agricu2tural lands and
operations consistent with Section 2-13 and
5-104; and,
- - 2. the paccel of land is classified as agricultural
lands by the County Assessor; and,
Y 3. the agricultura2 operation is consistent
with the definition for same in Section 20-1;
�"-_<<=;.`"� and,
;u:�_- `_1
.};,;�:;`�,
�-��`�:
Y"s,4,:;3 Commissioner's tteeting 8 July, 1985 - 9
�,.. ;,,
*�,_•z�
'�:� .
x`:
.�, _ : �`.��z;•.��``��'s� ' i
xs,
�g � f �� �� �s ��. �� 3, ����. ���r
"i� 'A'l.�,;c..',s��fiR. ,-�..ad,�.,�_._ . �.'-'�:,ig�„ � . ��}'`„Ry,";,��;�s., .,
4, the subdivision othecwise camplies aith the
p�lfcies and general regulations of the
Pitkin County Land Use Code; and
5. the Waivet fcom the annual application
require7ents for a lot split shall be alloved
for a given pareel of l�nd only onc� and upon
furthpc subaivision (if permittpd) of either
resultEng 2ot, Eull eompliance with Ebe
annual aprilicativn r�qufrements �nd qrnw[h
mana�ement alioCment pravisiong sha12 bt met
(b> !he division of a parcel of l�nd into two (Z)
uing2e fan+ily lotg ahece b�,rh parcelg ace restcicted
�By covrn�nt nr dth�rwl�e) agai»a! furthQr develop-
menc and the subd�vislnn Nill regul� in nna mor�
than EiEty pQCCent (SOt) of the density pecmfttgd
undec CUtt@flt toning, pcovided:
l. thQ propnged lota created by Section �-6(bi
shell meet the Eollo�ring definitian oE a s�ngle
family lot:
a aingle Ear�lly lot is a loe which may
conEaln no n►ocQ than ono (1) prtncipal
dvcillnh unit. Thla lot may contain an
Accetssory�lweliing unit wblch is d�sed rasecictod
wtth regard to the Aapen ��oueing Authoriey
guid@lines and cmployea houainq gulde►linos
as lound to Sccelon 3-8.1� of the Land UaQ CoBa
2. �hQ original paccel wust oither already
contotn ono {1) single family housa. or guality
for a growth management examptlon under ehe
pcovisions oE Section 5-51Q.2�b)
Planninq Direetor Alan Riehmnn explained thot a number oE
appllcanbe e�aatad rellance on tbe three (3) �uae�da�enre recitecl
above when d�QCOV@t� on Ficst ceadiny in lWy. Public notice tor
tbe public hea�ing, orig�na�ly schaduled foc Coday, was not
� accaApliahed, bowever, aa thac anothar heacing had to be scheduled
tor �2 August. The cwo I2) rasolutions aubmitted tor soard ceviQw
today wece prepared on an emetg�ncy adaPtion baeis 91van that
�eliance had bcen created on the publia hearin9 date of 8 July
and as lx August, the date on which the publia Aea�ring would aow
occuc, was sufficiently clase to today's date thAt no member of the
public vould be advecsely afEected by adoptian at tbis time.
Klanderud moved to apprave the resolukion as recited above
and Child secqnded,
Gideon Kau�man expressed some concecn wich the agricultural
� lot &plit amendment p�oposed and specifically the restrictiop
. kbak would limit its use to once only. Kaufman noted that tAe�e
weCe a number o£ older ranches in existence at tbis time, many of
� which contained a number of dwelling uaits; the limitation of one
(1) agricultural lot split per property vould create a hardship
foc many of these pa�cels in that m�ltiple divisions wouZd not be
allowed, KauEman did not feel that the single lot sp2it limitation
should apply to agricultural properties as the ownecship of most
of these parcels was retained in tbe family. Kaufman was, in this
" instance, representing a client consisting of tbree (3) children
- vho inherited a large ranch property that had been owned by the
family for a period of eighty (80) years; the limitation proposed
n �:s _�,� would preclade the division of the subject propetty to provide
,�::i fot three (3) separate lots and units,
r� �- • Klanderud noted that the County was not reptesentative of a
���', significant agcicultural area; although there were some large
�;�...F
y` , r� Commissioner's Meeting 8 3uly, 1985 - 10
�^�y
, �!:
,i�Fa r � . p� 1.
.s.ti F� , � aT.�7 �tt���5�(y.'r`4°e .'}5� ..,y{, �3 ifY.i .
4 ��� �-a{ �y. � jF� Y —���t..
�:'. ?` a _ `a t x.. +ii �,�� . .. _.;}'.T. �.+Cr;�'4 ti++�
�t .a.�_ *.s.t'��4#�*�� .,�iiy...A���+,`:F,.-c.. _.,� �'�q,.-'.:.�`�:.. .a���?'��r�
; ' ,+-,
agricvltural t.roperties taor:.hy o: presetvation, the Cauaty in and
of itself was not considered an area of agricultucal SfgnifiCance.
P.landerud did not feel that the limitation etttirely addtessed
the issue of large canches ancF family owner�hip, and she suqgested
that staft continue to revieH this issue. 2he anendmewt as
ptoposed was consideted appropria�e, hoaever, as ft Would address
the uae of th� agricultural lo: split pravision at this tine; ehe
atiend�ent t�oulci be furthe[ [evieaed and, �erh3��, revis�d, in
conjunction witii tiownva2ley naster plan efforts.
Kauf;;�n al�o r:ipcesse� �o;.,e �o�ecrn uith th�t rrnvi�ion nf
[he araenci::cnt ��hereb� a loe splic 5ru�or��d on � prn�ecty with ewo
f2) e�isting teH�dCiiC�S you2d ctcjuice that one (1) r��id�nce be
decd re�trice�d aa c:,�loyee hnutsinc�; it wa� nae knos�n wh�th�r phc
re�icience� �o rectrictecl ;�uvt co;�hly atth a�1 llou�inq Au�i�dcity
r,ualffir�tion� �7d c�uid�linc�. !l�u�en A::pl:�in�d rh�e da�llinq
ur�ies re�trfceed pursuant �o this �roviaio7 ncrd onlg co�piy� ►rith
o�cu�sancy guid�2in�st �hoae gutdelinta li:+it o�cupanc•, to rruidsnt�
of thc �o::�unity �7�rioye8 foc a :�ini�►um nu;rbac of haut� eaCli Wcek
and r10 nut sddreac Ir�rana or w+nrr�hie. �7ualiEinaetdnc. Ka��fnan
a�reec3 th�t ehe nec��ancy c��ericcion uao thr ,.sont ap�rnprint�
ryuidcline Eor th� agricultutal lot �pli� proNC�t�re. tta uuq�QSat�d,
hwarvrc, that �he �;renct.�aene cle�rly indicatc thae only the ��loyecr
hnu�inry aarup�ncy �utciclinza e�duld �;�ply ta unita ccatrietrc!
�ucguan� eo et�� lot s;�?te �taceclure,
�lrooke Peesccot� axpre�aed aomE coneorn ui�h the agricul:ur�l
loe �pllt �roredurej ehate :+ac ao�ae eonaern thflt both natural aacl
ACtjl°1CL31 t�oundzcles, gurh :�a roacls �nd Watervaya, :�y crcoeo a
riOfl-ronEornin� }�areel a� lana !n ehe cvcht thQ lot splie pcocedura
uaa invokacl.
!i�Attt3s[tft) ehen �ovccl to i�p�aere tbc rouolutton aul�jccC �o Lhe
Eollouins� anenelr.:cnt:
4-G.?Sb)(1): The propo�e�i ioe� CCCACL-d �* Sectlan q-6 �hal�
-:act elie �olloUin� clQftnitian a� a sin�?v fA�ily lot:
A �in�l� [��ily lat is a ipt uhich aay contatn no nore
khan one II? priaeipal cI►ie�lisg uni,t. Thfa lot nati
;; cnnt�in as� ac�Qasorl d�elling unit uhi�l� ia doc�]
� - res�ricceel wieh r�e�ar�l �� Qccupancy !�y anpl�ycea Q@ �h�
ca�mu�ity �� dofineJ ay the guiciclinea e� th�AsPefl/Pitkin
ttouainc� nutho�itk^
Ghild s�canded �nd the na�ion p�ssed unanic+ausl�r. The �3oard
qenerally a,reed to canducc a wqrk se�sion on the lot splik
ac�end^�en-s praor to Che public hcaring.
Fublic The soard convened a public :�eetinq to consideK the �dwards
Fieeting: E�p2oyee D�te2ling Unit, a [equest to app[QVe tbe use of an
Edwards existing res�dence, �ituated on Lot Thirteen (!3), �slock One !1!
- F�nployee oi 'the Aspen !ligh2ands Subdivision in the 8-30 ?one �isttict and
Dwell currently occupied by the aoplicant, as an enplayee duelling
' - Unit unit, The subject residence eras five hundred and seventy-six
_ {576) square feet in size; the applicant has p[oposed to deed
,� �`" : restrict the d:lelling as an e�plo�ee unit and construcc another
_ '- '"'_` cesidence, to serve as ihe princinal residence, at a size oP
bet,teen one thousand, five hundred {1,500) and one tho�sand,
eighE hundred {1,800) sguare feet. The anplicant �•rould continue
-�-�-',w- to reside in the existing dF�elling pending completion of the neu
"`�� "' residence. The a lication rras submitted ursuant to Section
�� _.
�,."�'-.: 3-8.13(d) of the Land Use Code wherein enployee units construcEed
��;��,.�,.;_ prior to June of 1981 were addressed,
�S,.,:..x:
.:--..1�:?`.�`".
'�=�:?"�`''� Referral comnents were
generally su�portive; 4�ater and sewe�
�K.f�. y provided by the City of Aspen and the Aspen
;i�=-�:..
services ��ere alread
-^���� Consolidated Sanitation District, respectively, access F�as
�`'`��4 Commissioner's Eieeting 8 July, 1985 - 11
~;r,.��
.-�;:
. ..,7�.y _ ,t .
, . -_.Z,�S��kiN-.:� k � '_� ��
.. ��. �f 4 Y�' ♦ ° y Ih� -� �;4� i
� :. '.y +�' k.l ��` - � J ���- .
-. _. , ..q•e<iy . ..+... ` .'. � _ �]�4 t 1:, �`
.. . _ ....i1..-a'.'.�.s+o _. 4.._w�. . _ it.Tisfl�.«rWr^+f. +:w: .... _.
alteady established off of Glen �agles Ro�d, and the Housiny
Authority addressed thc Reed ta restriet the c3�►eliinq as an
employee unit. The Building bepartment vetified that the subject
unit was constcuctpd ptfoc to June of 1981.
tiouben explaine� that the application w�s somewhat unusnal
fn that approval aas reque�ted for an employep unit prior to tbe
construation of the principal recidence. In additian, a detachpd
enployee unit would be p[�cluded under existing tpgu2atiorts in
thc nubject xonp di�tcict. Approval ef the unit Would re�uire a
drt�rninatfnn triat the �xlscing duelling Was a bandit uniC aa
d�fined in Se�etbn 3-8.l�td) of rh� Cade. 'Che tevi�N ccieecia
ronrained in this Sertion were aaciressad by th� appli�ane a�
. Eo11n►rg s
�. �h� subj�tct untt was ronseructed pefar to 8 Juner. 1991
b. the inr@rior living spaee of eh� sub�e�r unie vas lees
than Eive hundted �500) si�uace fe�t
e. occupancy reciufresnantn can be mQt by the exSatSng cabtn
d. the aphlicaot haa aqrced to comply witN all Untfocm
Ouliding Code cequ3ccaeota as deeecained by the Duilding
inn�seectot
e. Ehe combined aquaca Eooeago o! Doth tha oxiating
d++olling a�d Ehc propo8ed prinel�al resldenco would noe
oxcocd thc adxi�aum allowable aquaro Eootage on tha
aubjecr loc, in additlon, the oxtaltinq dwolting waa
genecally not vlslblc exaept From thQ adjACenr two t2►
lotet '
. t. �ho applicant has agceed eo deed restrice the existing
d�+elll�g Ln aecoc�anccr wleh Houslog AntHocity guideli»�a
upon occu�aoey ot the oew pcineipal resldee►ea
' q. tbe adjacont propocky oaners h�ve bcen notlticd oE the
application withaut oajcetion
� llouben con�ludad by noting tha� ther aPplication. though not
prociaeiy in compliancQ vith tha intant oE the e�eployee housfaq
regula�ians, vae a practical rec�uestr in the absence of oppsoval,
the exiscing dwelliag would have to be damolish�d aaJ a viable
ewployee unit would be lost. Although the order oE coase�uction
vao, in kbia instance, backr�ards (the priacipal rvsidance �a�
genecal2y conatrucEed prior to tb� e�ployee unit), tbis factar
alane was nct cansiderQd a suEficien� basis for dertial. The
applicant bas demonstrated that khe existiog dvelling cou2d
comply r+ith the ceviex criteria estahlished Eor bandit unitst
�hould the Boa�d find that the subject �'�rellin@ vas vithin the
lnkent of the bandit unit �egulations, a detached employee unit
could be allowed.
The Planning o�fice found tbac the impacts of tbe proposal
` 1 uece insuastankial and that the a pplication vas generally ++ithin
the intent of Section 3-8.13 of the Code. The office recommended
-: � approval subject to the following four (4) conditions:
;:: ._i
1, prior to occupancy of the new unit, the applicant shall
, comply with a12 the employee housing requirements as noted
-- ip the Housing Authority memo dated 7 June, 1985
.:`.�:4-r- _ .
'". 2. the Building Department shall inspect the existing dwelling
=;'.=r:':-�,� and verify that it meets health and safety guidelines in
:�=`�-`�•' accocdance with the Uniform 8uilding Code
-�..--.y-;.
,�.,,,; �; 3. the applicant shall be allowed to continue to occupy the
`'�r,�x;`;; existing dwelling until sueh time as the principal dwelling
'-r�'%�' is completed. At such time as the principal dwelling is
F��r>�-.-',
i :•
''�""��, ;,; Cotamissioner's Meetin9 6 July, 1965 - 12
�,'rT,F;cr.�*�
..:. ;.�1
'.;s.`...;..'.';
,=-�.'..
� r �
� ��k-.� �,� ,: � .,._
y h�f�y
� - 1 . a�u.`a R' � ..�'''��c��.y�� ��/� ±�?�i�'�;�}��.7�TLR.e�:::"� .
. . . � . . ,rr.. .... . _o-_ ..�._._- . . . -�.n..+.e.�.•�4.�+.+:i�! �+/ ..
completed, the exfsting dr�telling shall automatically become
an enployee housing unit restricted by the guidelines
imposed in Condition One (1) above
4, undet no circumstances shall the combined FAR of the existing
dwelling and the net+ (proposed) principal dr+elling unit
�xcced the naximun �AR of the It-30 Zone District
Klandecud expcecsed sonc conceCn with the pcoposal and
particulac]y With the Casi� Eor ita rpvi�a; Che pxisting dwelling
r►as not, at tMis time, a bandit unit, rather, it ua� consideced a
legal, prinacy reuidench for the subject ldt. Kla»decud explained
that h�r concrrn was limited to thc employ�e hnusing regulationa
and Cheie appiicability= the new employee houging cegulaeiong
reguired that all employe� unitu gubuequent to 1981 mu�t be
acrached td thp primacy c�siden�e. in this in�atance, the applicant
Mac rcguested approval for a detaChed employee unit wNpreas a�ll
n£ the adjacent property ur+ners in che subjert Subdivieion would
be limited to attarhrd unit$ only.
Child noted that tha �ubjeet unit waa fairly 8ma11 in slze
and generaily not vialblr Ernc� adjaeent properties. Ne alao noted
that the subS�et unic, and par�trulacly ita size, vda used aa �he
basia Eoc ehe omployeQ houaing cequiotions ortginally adopted by
Ehe County.
Applicane .1oQ ¢dwarda explained that odjacene property
ownecs Wllaon and Davia wcrQ aupWoctivo oE ehe appllcatlon
alehough boeh ovnerc were roncocned wlth ehe em�loyao housing
raqulcumenear neither pco ecey owner Pelt, for inctanee, that eho
Nouaing Authorl�y ahoui� bQ able to solect the tenant Eor tho
cmPloyee unit.
� The Fioard generally agcced, wlth the cxcoption oC K1anAecud,
that thv exlaCing unit qualLfied as a bandit untb purauant to
Sectio� 3-8.13 of tbe Codo� altbough the amployee unit prcceded
tha principal �)vvlling in thta i�sstancc, lt vas Found to comply
. with all o� thc critvcia establtshed in thia sectlon and on thts
basis bh� uni eould bc canaiAerecl. I� aa�icio�, although the
am�loyea hpus�ng ra9ulatians ++ere generally intcnded to addceas
ba��lit units that did nok aerva as A primary resideneo on a given
� paGCel, thase regulatio�a di�l no� �acessarily precludo lhc+
approval p[ an emPloy�e uniE �hat pceceded the prtmary reside�ce.
Tbe subject unit vas �ound co ba consistent uith tha intent o�
tha employae housing cagulatians glven the size and history of
the subject unit, as fhe FAR requirements would continua to be
complied vith, as visual impacts on existing residences wece
negligible a�d due to the unani�ous aonsent of adjacent propecty
ow�e�s.
Klandecud explained that it would not be appcoptiate ko
demolish Gh� existing dvellin9 as it would serve to provide
employee housing for the com�unity. She was cor.cerned, however,
with hov the approval oE the unit ++ould comp2y with the bandit
unit procedures when the unit vas not illegal at this tirne.
Edwards stated that he agreed with tbe conditions of approval
_ ` as recommended by the Planning office with the exception of the
� first; with respect to the employee housing requitements identified
__:� by the Housing Authority, Edwacds disputed that requirement
vhereby that Authority could select a tenant for the subject
- unit. 8e did not feel that the caretaker unit procedures wece
intended to function in the same fashion as those utilized f or
-- employee housing projects; it was felt that the occupant of an
__ employee unit that functioned as a caretaker unit should be
- . selected by the owner of the property and not by the Authority.
- Edwa�ds stated that he would agree to comply with a six (6) month
minimum rental resttiction and that the occupant be qualiiied as
�-� an employee of the community, all as required by the Authority;
�:-_:,=a•�-. he did not feel, however, that the Authority was entitled to
.-•-�<•.
� - Commissioner's lfeeting B July, 1985 - 13
..,ti _
r^° ;>.:--
�::
.�-
� . i ..:. '�"''s`k �: iy,i� ��•r� :, y .� .
�. � ::_� ��-.t _�� 4 � .
. . x Z -i-�� .�:f:. 'K� �y z -`� � � .
.__ 's` . '`•,�-, _...ti�.'w�r.w�n•.-+�' ' � i.$.u:-+:..i�-%.4�� �.'0 0.�aRinai�7��3��..'.��`� .
select a tenant foc the unit in the absence of the ptoperty
ownpts appcoval.
Housing Office !fanager Ann Bowhan explained that the Nousing
Authority did not desire to select tenants for employee units
that were siivated on private propecty. The Authority simply
d�sired to ensure that units so approved wete occupied by qualified
employreg Chat were not menbers of the owners fahily aa such
aould deEeat the purpose of the regulatfons. Although a propecty
orrnec wac able to select a tenant for prfvate uniCS, the AuthociCy
would requic� verification of employment Eor the occupanC and a
aopy of a six (61 month roinimum lease.
�duardg stated thac he wou18 not objec� to providing the
Houaing Authncity wifh vecification of the occupant's employment
and a copy of the lcase agrpement fur � minimum tern nE six (6)
�onths.
C�owu�an explained Chat, althouqh ehe Au�horlty nuppocred the
aele�tion oE tenanrs by propecty ownerss under these ricrumstances,
it did not feti that units so approved ahould remain vacant Eor an
extended period of time, tt was felt thot the ownec ahould bce
required to rent the em�loyce uniE within a speciEied peciod oE
. tiu�c, anc! it vaa ssuggcated ehat a partod oE beteween nincty C40) and
one huncirad ancl tucnty (l20) days ahould be provided for thla
pucpoaoj !n tho evene the ou�er loilod ro cent the unt! wlthin
this rimo peNod, the Authority would ehen be oble co rene the
uni! to a qualilicd enployeo. Pcivaee cmployeo units werQ intendetl
to provide emploync houning and thoro ahould b@ somc oaoucance
rhat they r►ould be uaod Eo� thia pucpoao. OowmAn noted chae
, the only ceaaon the exis�ting dweiling unia would bc allarcd to
rcmatn on the oubjoct property was thnt i� woulcl provldc mnployce •
housing, oncl on thia bosls ehero ahould be nome caquirement that
; it be use� Eor thia purHoea.
�dwacclu cxplatnecl �hat thoro uas no proviaion in thc 6and
ilsc Codc at lhis timo vhcrvGy employce clvelliny unito must bc
rcntQd within a spaciEiad timc pertod, and that he would not
agree to such a conditio�.
Tha Roard ganerally agraed that, with respect to occupancy
oF tha aubjeet unit, the a�plicant was only reguired to �rovide
the ftousing Auehorlty vith verification oF employment ot thv
. occupant and a copy of a six (6) u�onth mi�imum tarc� lea�e. Tho
Authority would not have the right eo select a tenant Eoc the
unit and it need not be rented wikhin a specified time peciod.
Madsen then moved to apprave the application subject to the
four (q) conditions recoa�mended by the 8lanning office recited
above and as amended bela+:
i l. prior to occupancy of the new unit, the applicank shall
E comply with all employee housing requirements as noted
, in the Housing Authoriky memo to the Planning office
+ dated 7 June, 1985; however, Condition T�ro (2) of
� that memo shall be amended to read:
-_ ' '� "2. verification of employment of persons living in
the employee unit shall be completed and filed
with the Housing Authority by the orrner of the
unit prior to occupancy thereof, to the satisfaction
•,:1
of the Housing Authority•
- �
and Condition Three (3) of that me�ao shall be a�ended
.f to read:
-:-K -�
`� '3. the employee dwelling unit is limited to occupancy
� by not more than two (2) people. Resident adults
r� 5� must qualify as, and have been found by the
��=�°";.� Housing Authority to be, employees of the cortununity
:L_��_v:�i
;_.u.;..,ll Commissioner's 6leeting S July, 1985 - 14
���^`��
.-�+';: _r'
_ `.r=;.:���
� �— , __
_.u�.,, �.._..��.., - _
, � ,�,`.;
:�-�.e.�,;:, ;� ,�� � ,
r, ., ,� - . � � .
M
-. + 3 7 '.: . '��-„�",�r � �.i�x� ✓ ?V �' ��.' ,.����G +��' .
S - s� 'E
., ..y.�=-�.'a�'�v.s. K'�-fi2=.a�k�h'�s..:er ..._. s_..a`_ _.. ','` ,_ Ce�7�w,..�ac�`.�35+.6-: ' ._ ._
and tesidents therefote as referred to above"
Child Seconded and the �otion passed unaninously.
Klanderud noted that employ�e housing units siCuated on
private ptopecty Wece approved specifically to pcovide additional
employee housinq in the comnunity. Although it uould be difficult
to pstablish a time period within which a property ownec must
rent such a� unit, Klandetud felt that all units approved pucsuant
ta the County's enployee hausing regul�ti�nsz chouid be used Eur
iha purpose Eoc which they ucce appcoved and Congistent wi�h
thelr sonditions of �ppcov�l. in thc event oE non-�ompli�nce, she
felt that the gosrd should inieiat� an in�unetion proa�duce ,
�idvided wi h�a�o� �~eE ra lea��c�er�n cn@ louee�ni aftec�a
period of a few yrarsy �or instance, Ehe Authority rould, suBject
to v�ciEic�tion r►� non-cnmplianr�, r�rquire that the pcoperty
nvnec permanently clase �he unie snd c��aove thosse fixtucess
deEineB in che tand Use Codc as� eons�icucing a cK+elling unit.
Eik Ctndy Nouben i�ecoduced tha Elk ttouneale 6odge, a apQCial
Nou�tain rcvicev applicatlon. The subjact �roperty vas situalecd on Casele
[.odge Cceek Rasd. coni�lned epptoxlmately Eitly-fivQ t55) accsa oE
land and was impcoved wLth a oumbor oE extating cabin and barn
Eacilitiea. Spoclal ceviaw oppcoval voa regueatced eo allow Eoc
vacioua omenckaents to tho origLna! aubmiasion. ItoubQn Qx��ai�ecl
tha� che appllca�c cequeated, aubaQquent Eo tho cubmtsalon oE eb@
a�+pllcation, an oppoceuntty to EurthQC covise thQ sito plan. Aa
ti�eaQ ceviestona hnve not yet becn [inalt=ed ancl would noe be
eo�apleted in xha oear Eutura, the applicant has raquestod that
thc application bo Eabied eo a dato uncectain.
Chilr] movcd to tablc the applicatioa. ttadaQn accondcd and
tN� onotion passsed una�iwously.
Auadi Gincly Houban incraduced thc [tua�lt SouCh &ho[es Subdiviaion
, South appitcatian, a r�iqueak to amand !he Subdivtaton Ipprovements
Shores Agceament to address the ineerior road system. Thc Subdivision,
Inprova consisting of cwo hundred and eighty (2A4) ecres located on the
Aqcae aouth shoca oF Ruedi ltcservoir, ceceived approval to develop
fourteen (14I single �amily lots in Apr11 of last yeac subject to
vacious conditions of cecard, one (1) of tbose conditions requited
tbe execution af an Iaprovemeots Agte�ment that provided For,
apangst otbers, coad improvemants in compliance with County
standa�ds and specifica�ions. Houben explalned tbat the tsoasd
adopted, in tlay of this year and upan the secoamendation of tbe
Assistant county �n9ineer, new road standa�ds to bekte� reflect
sural aceas of the Counky vhere urban roads were not considered
appro�riate. The new standards, which were actual2y Qodeled afte�
the Ruedi South Shores Subdivision, gene�ally resulted in a
reduction in the standards and specifications; certain standards,
such as road width and othecs, were seduced f o[ low traffic volume
roads so that siqoificant road cuts and other improvements
- - coulu be avoided. The application submitted for Hoard revier+ today
would amend the Improvements Agreement specifically to provide
for compliance with the new road standards and specifications;
. the amendment would simply tequice compliance with the 1985
Pitkin COunty Road Standards and Specifications to allow for
=�.t ``; minimal road improvements consistent with the original submission.
= The Planning Office reviewed the application and recommended
x - apptoval subject to the following two (2) conditions:
"'�' �= '� 1, the amended Subdivision Improvements Aqreement shall be
,,�;.;.:.
�;,:;•- -,
'F;�,"._`.'�; recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office
..:�"z�i
�;. -
x �` '� Commissioner's lleeting 8 July, 1985 - 15
�'�`�:��%'�
:•:�
i ;.
'�:.
���' j
_ ._''- k4t � L ' � ���� � :.��:� + ..� -
��.�. -� K.-� - .+K
S����„ s 1 �As� � �+
F�3'r .��'-�'x��.'�..Yiy . . . .•K _ . �+^�•rpa' .
2. the station points for the road shall be verified by
trie Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office prioc to final apptoval
Klandetud moved to approve the application subjeet to the
tWO (2) conditions recited above. Child seconded and the notion
passed unanimously.
�oaial 5ocial 5ervicps Director Mik� 5chultz in[rociuCed a Fooci
Scrvicess 5�amp p�r�c�ip�tiion Aqreement to be ent¢ted intn between the
noard �nd Eagle Cnunty. �agle County has issued Eood stamps for
pitkin County sinc� 1980 on a secvicr contraGt bagis due to the
r�la[ively �6M l�v�l of food stamp activity in Pitkin CounCy.
PiCkin contracted With �agle, �t a cose oE one hundred and
rvcrnty-�iv� dnll�rs (5125) ner month, ag locai a�tivity in this
Eield was not �uEficiEnt enougb to warrant additionnl staff fnr
` this prngra�. mhr rontcart uubmitted fnt 1]oard cevieW todny
wnuld increasce ehe monchly rost to two hundred and sevenry-five
dollars (5275), the first nuch inrreaae in �he hast Eouc (4)
yeora, berause of an incre�ge in caneload. Schultz explained chat
coetracting wich Earyle County ed provide chis aervica was �he
most coat @fEective means of �roviding food atomp secvicee in
this acen j in thr at�aence of sucb a eontrocE, Pitkin County'a
Ochartment oE Sociai Servicca would require acWltfo�al staEE
au��orc eo ocdec, naineain and aecure Eood stamp coupone, provide
daily activlty ceporto, monehiy atate atatua reports, and oehera,
all oE vhich would rersule In a gccaeer cost.
�IAdaen moved to authoriao ehe Chaic eo execute tho Agceement,
Kla�dorud aeeo�docl and the raotio� pasaed unanimoualy.
Schultz lhon intcoduced !he Ilome and Conmunity saned Servicea
Program Agreemc�t For thc perLoA oF 1 July, 1985, thcough 30
Juna, 19d6. The 1lomv ancl Coav�uniey t3ased Scrviccs Program was
established as an altcrnativc to nursing home cace an� vould
provlde aiQila� sacviees to oligiblo clieoEs vithin tbe hoa�a or
somc othcr eo�+.�+unity aettirtg. Tha Social Services Deparer+ont has
assuned �esaon�ibilicy Eoc this Pragram by ucling as tbe Case
Plaaage�e�t Agenc��t duties aasueaocl undec this program ineludo the
eo�[i�mation o2 tledicaid eligibilitx, an asssessa+ent oE client
naods, the devolopment aa� fa�plesnentation o[ a caBe plan, tbe
evaluaeion o� secviee needA and coordination oE eEtarts bcrtween
various pravidec9. The DePact�nent wuuld, pursuant to this pcogcam.
qualify clients and authorize Conraunity Health Secvices to
provlde the service and bill for tiedieaid reimbucsement. schultz
nated that, alkhough there have becn no cli9ible clients during
the paat tvo t21 yeacs, the oepartment was capable of ineeting
client needs. services provided putsuank to this prog�am vould
likely become more impoctant as senio� housing alternativea were
fu�ther developed. He recomnended that the soard execute the
Agceement, a designation of the De�art�ent as the Case Management
, A9eocy and a generai, as weil as specific, assu�ance to the
Colorado Department of social Services that the Agency would
function in compliance with state regulations.
Madsen move6 co authocize tbe Chair to eaecute the Agreement,
Child seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
Finally, Schu2tz introduced a lettec addressed to the
Chairman of the Colorado State Board of Social Services. The
' letter expressed the concerns of the Board with respect to
- recently initiated changes in Area Agency on Aging funding.
- -_ � Specifically, the letter requested that the State Board not
' eliminate flooc funding, rescind the proposal mandating any
'� + number of F.T.E.'s, and that the administration allocation to
����`:�' � Agencies on Aging be such that, regardless of the size, sufficient
�.'j funding for basic operational costs be pcovided.
:�`t,.;�::;
..r-;. ._.
•�,-,4_,-.;� Child moved to authorize the Chair to sign the letter,
s:•���.
`��:�`;�,i Commissionei's tdeeting 8 July, 1985 - 16
�?:q-:<--
�'�'�
��i�� r•.
�i_
�w������*���� '•. j�?,`���,, •;"�,�a s�4�r .
_�t ^a3 �i.�zc5 r.7�� .. .A�' ,:����.
:.i . � M �'�}:�- �� � 3 . �:� » t� � a �,�.. .
rlis"y�:e � ��'''�c�J' .�-� s��"�+�b��vlwik..t< .�,� ��;���F.:.� . . .. . ��w�`' ,�;�.r.-.t.a
iiadsen seconded and the �otfon passed unani�ou�ly.
Public Cas�1e CraeY, fioad re�ident 5tuar: ;;ace expressed concern
Cora�ent with �:eed cutting along the f�oad. Castle Creek Ttoad was oansideced
one of the pti7ary scenic route� fn the County and weed moWin9
along Che Road ttas achieved in an eEfott ta pcovide fot bCtter
�fte di�tance. :'ace did not fe�t that thc tioNing nrogran t+�s
n�ce�sary an3 hc �_ronqly objected to its inplc,aentation on Chr
bnad.
t�ublic •tocY.s bieector �lvd �ylar expl�irt�d ehat the t�oaci an8
gridgc t7Q��rCntnt r,tr�w�d along the :±oad up tc th� Iast bridgp, or
the !!aakeye t3ridqe. t�*eadc ad�acent to a coadway car� ca��e haeards
in thae they ccdurc �ite cii�tancr, �nd Cactic Cte�k RdSd, NMSCIIN�E3
fiaavily+ travclad anci u�ed by a lacqe hu:�bcr nE 5icyrii�t�s, �lid
not have any roaei �:�dulcler*,. €;ylar �u�»prirted the noWin� �rogr�m�
Nhercin a :��xi7u:► �a4h o: ehrer i3) Eece !n widrh was cue. nn
the bn�i� of s�Pety eon�t�lec3ttnn�,
tt�rc Erle thst tt�a veedu and uildfios�aca alnnc� the P.oaB
anai��rci tn cicEininry it� .eidth �nd �cted aa � vtaual ald. lto�t
oE the pla.hctt s�er� �alrl/ lou in het�h� and noaing W�a no�
coeuic]ereci necaaa�r�/.
Eilake auggeaeuci eh�� �ha �epaccr..ene reduco ehe aco,pe oE tho
�ouinq progr�� on tha ^o�d to a hcighe of tvo (2) Eoett only
vegctation i� cxcesss of cNa t�) feet tn hoight Would be cut Eor
aiee disse�s�cc ,aurisoac�.
kylae cs:4�latnec! thae .,QSring uaa caan�latec! Eor uitc diatanco
pucfjoge�. !:e agreod to tc►veacigato :� reduceton in �ho a�o�+iny
. pro�tan n� �u�gea�ed, to ira�lement a cvducecl wowing pcogra�► on
• thc Fto�c! if Fea�iblc, �n� to advi�c ehe !soard in the evenc �ht�
reduecia� �oulci noe be �ccAZpliahecl. 11e noted thaE Caatlo Cceek
Road u�� nok �ehec1u14d �At t+auin*� �or �nothoc tuo �2� �o �aur (4)
wecl;s.
. � �nviconnRn�al 1laalth plrector Tar� Aunlog �rovide�l an update
- , on ch4 nosyuico contrAl progr�.� ia chc ttorch Sta�/tloun�airt valley
nrers. A vc�y �uccea�ful valunteec controi prQgra� was i�+plemented
in this �rea durin4 the past three (3) years at na cosz ka the
Caunty oth�r than thcs flircetot'� time. The �oluntees program tiias
not pur�ued chis jear and, as a resu2t, mosquita infestation in
' the a�ea tiias very extensive. �tesident., easc oE toun, in kath the
City and the Counev, uere •re�y concerned and have agreed to
inves�igate and initiate the fornatian of a �o�quito conGrol
ciistriet; the residencs hsve al�eady forne� a eo:�u�ittee foc this
purpose and have retained legal counsel to assisk in this e£fort.
; Finance Oicector To� Uken noted chat the cosc of the volunteer
� progra� last year, tirliich approxinated four thousand dol2ars
(54,000?, tiras ver� ^�ini�al. E!e did not feel that the formation of
� a special district for tne purpose of ziosquito control ti+as
�- feasible; the overhead costs foc Lhe administtation of the
„; =+# distcict crould be su5stantia2 uhereas nrogram costs vould be
1 minot.
`"� Dunlop explazned that the volunteer pcogra�a, :+hile effective
�Y '=-`. -� in arevious yeacs, �ras not considered the nost appcopriate
,�:-� =� procjram simply because it re2ied upon vo2unteers. The formation
y= �� of a special district would ensure that the prograr� was implemented
� '�� on an annual basis and would assess the cost on an equitable
'k- �.._� basis anongst the residents. He also noted that the initial costs
� '� � of the district crould be highec than in previous yeacs due to
� equipment purchase and others.
� a�
�� Commissioner's t!eeting 8 July, 1985 - 17
��:;,�
, ;.
.�.:.
� ���-<.•,��`ysg'� ,j ' � : '
�-, .{ r'� -� _�:,, � �_ ; �,� � �,.. "
, , x�:�°�;r�3.r.+n.x.eas.:�+f�av, _ "....��,.���+;��. . � ' �.`�;`,'�,`_`��.�.�,�y
The Board tequested that staff review all altetnatives to
providing control secvices priot to initiating the formation of a
� special district.
tdinutes The ninuces of 22 April. 19�5, were revieWed and appcdvcd as
submitted.
Sl+nleu Child mov�d to apprnve � r��dlution gtanting subdiviaion
Subdiv exemption fdr the pucpose of ad�uating � 1�t line b@CN@¢it 0dj8�@nE
�xempt pacceis oE la�nd in the Red ttc►untain Subdivision Eor 3nzanne and
uonald S+ales. tiadaen ��conded and th� notion pasa@d unanimously.
Deliac Child r�ovc�d to approve a cesolutlon grancing aubclivision
Subdiv Qxernption fnt the Deli�e proper�y. Klanderud second�d and the
Ex�t�pt �otion pasaed unanimously.
liocna�adt Chlld movnd to approve a resolution approving a cubdivi8lon
Subdiv exe��tion cequQat for the Eataee oE Nichoel C Hernstadt Eor the
Exaa►pe Pucpoae oE State Highway 82 Righl-of-way Acqutaitlon. ItlandQCUd
scco�dod and thc mo!!on paaoed unantmously.
Nouneatn Child movorl to approvo a reeolutton approving a aubdiviaion
vaI2ey excmption cc�uost by the Nountain vailey Iio�aeowners Aaaociatien.
Subdiv Nadsen seconded and ehe motlon �nesaed unanimoualy.
Canyon Ci�cly ilouban introdueed a resolu�ion appcoving tbe �inal
Cablc subdlvision �lat a�d condomiaiumization tor Canyon Cablo Proiects
Projocts one 11) and 'it+o t21, aod rexonln9 i.ot '!bo (2) ot the Subdiv�sio�
I & 2 Ecom I Eo �-2 z►nd tha raxaning at f,ot Qna (3) fcom I to PHH.
Final Noubon noted that tha reaolution vould gca�t ti�al aPproval to
the developc�anes the �ubject subdiviaion would coosist oE two (2)
lots, on@ I1) o� vhich conta�ned tl►e existing employee houaing
apartment building and designated as Lot One (1), a�d tbe othec
of ubich vauld contain the ezisting oEfice building and tbe
proposed cocs�ercial facility and desi9nated as I.at 'iwo.
Nerb Klein, an attorney cepresenting the applicant, questioned
that condition Vbe[eby the County Enginee� would approve the
amended final plat; thece vas concern as the�e vas no County
Eaginees positio� at this time. Flouben explained tbat planner Tom
Newland was perfoEeaing tbe Bnginee�'s duties at this kime and
that the conditiort should remain as drafted.
. Child moved to approve the reaolution, Madsen seconded and
the motion passed unanimously.
s ----------
Building Building Inspector Jim ��lilson introduced a lease agreement
Dept to be entered into between the Board artd Maurice Beriro. The
- Lease Agreement would provide for the rental of office space in the
Aqree City Plaza Building for the Department for a petiod of one (1)
'�° year at a monthly cost of two thousand, six hundred and twelve
-s ` =_ dollars (52,612) . The Agreement was identical to that executed
��.��_-�+'� last year except for the rental cost; the Agreement reflected a
� -- four and one half percent (4.58) rental increase amounting to an
��.,-''� ' additional annual cost of one thousand, three hundced and forty-four
�r�° �- dollars ($1,344) , t•Tilson recommended approval of the Agreement as
��'f Commissioner's lleeting 8 July, 1985 - 18
;�t X�` .�...
�s
�::.�:.. .<
• i.
�:.
�
; �.�s,�,� Y � � " • ...
.,.-,�i ;•_� ,i� -'T ��,. !a. � ��� � ��i�`.< y�1`��c,�'�` •
. ' 3 . tr �p a i 1�,+ �.F y . . �T . � }�'
� �.sd..t :s tx� W .t � � '�
, � . � +,. ,:�. b♦
_ , .. ., a;"TSat •.�" .cj°1i•:':�eeYf.l.'�i'`".� ......� i....i."<. � _. . . ��5� yA�:+f}��:y>-t�. '".
submitted. He also noted that, gfven the relocation of the Aspen
Police bepactment to the basement of the �Coucthouse, the Buildinq
bepartment WouYd likely be moved to vacant spacp in City Nall
sonetime next year.
flad�en novpd Co authotfze the Chair to execute the Agreement,
Child SECbttdpd ahcl the notion �ssed unanimously.
NeLain t►ublic Ftorks Dicertor �ud �ylar inCCOdueed an Agreem8nt to
�lae�s be ent�red into berveen th� Buard and �la� Con��ruattan Com�any
Raad Enc the Hct,ain Fl�tg/5miCh Hill Itbad prnjert. The AgCegm�nt
Prdjeet Wcruld provide fcsr the paving nf the Road at a cost nf thrgg
hundced an8 ntnety-aix thouuand, two hundr�d aod �ixty doll�rc
�nd �ixty a�nt� (S]96,260.60). Ey�ac norrd that ehe hgreement
would provide for the eo;npletion oE most oE the Pcojcet eonsisCent
wiEh the bid docurneentraf �i�n�ge, gerinin�, landsraping and
enginecring Eor thi� Pcoie�t r►ould �11 be arcomplLuhed pucsuant
tn nepararc� a�ree�rne�. A to�al oE Eour hundced and sixry-nine
thouonnd dollara (5�69,000) In Eunds were appcopciated Eoc ehe
oneire Pcojec� laae yeari baaed on rurcanr Qatimates, the total
E�co ect eost ha8 now boen cevleed Ea Elve hundced thouaAnd
dol�ars (5500,000) . Eyloc �oted ehat eher County Attocney haa
revieued all contract documentse related eo Eho Pro�ect, an�l he
rQCOmoaended a�proval ao Bu6mttted.
• Nadsen movQd to authocize eho Chalr eo exQCUte eho Agceemeat,
Child aocondc�i and ebo moelon pasaed unanlmously.
Cylac Ehon introduccd a �ra�t ot ¢aocmont and Road Conatcuction
3�+pcovemcnr Agrocr+ent to bc cntered ieto berveon the tsoard and
ldilto� aa[Ece Jr. Thv Agrce�enc uaa necQasary tor tho lfcLain Flata
Road pcojecr ie �hae ft would pcovida Eor thc eonveyanco to the
�ouncy of sixty-ninc onc hunclrcclths t.691 oE an acrc oE land foc
soad imp�ovenent purposcs. Thc CounEy would, in axchange toc tha
acceaga, i�+Pcove apg�oxiaaeely nine hunclred (9001 ieee of Ehe
JaEFeQ drLvcruay Ae a eost of appcoxiQacely th�ee thousand, Ftve
hunciced dollars (53,500) .
ehil� novod to aucharize the Chalr to cxecute tho Gsant aad
tha Agreemo�e. Klande�ud �econded and the motton passed unani�aously.
Finally, kylar int�oduced two (2) quit clai� dcods Eo ba
entered inta between tbe &oard and Ro6est and Amelia Kopp. The
deeds wauld provide Po� khe exchange at twenty-two one hundtedtbs
(.z2) of an acce of land in tbe viciniky of Smikh tlill Roadi Kopp
would quit clair� his intecest in land narth af the Road bouadacy
tn the Cauoty vhereas the Board would quit clai�+ its intecest in
land south of the Raad boundary to Kopp. The deeds, wbich were
necessary for the compietion of the Pcoject, vould resalve an
existing dispute concecning the boundacy between tbe Road and the
Kopp propecty by establishing a new, mutually acceptable, bo�ndacy.
Klanderud moved to authorize the Chair to execute the quit
claim deed in favor of �tobert and A�elia Kopp for the Smith Hill
: � Road project subject to the receipt of a deed quit claiming
'-i identical acreage to the County from the Kopps. Child seco�ded
" ? and the motion passed unanimously.
_ Bob Kopp explained that there was an adjudicated spring on
' his pcoperty and he was concerned with run off ia the vicinity of
= _- the Road; due to steep slopes in the area, he felt that culvects
-= - should be installed so that run off would be diverted into erush
- �''':: Creek. He also noted that there was, at one time, a fence along his
� = _ property boundary that has since fallen and been covered with
�. rubble due to the gcading and plowing of the Road. Ae felt that
_��;'-:= �-� the fence should be repaired at the County's expense.
� �y :
��F'�' Eyla� agreed to investigate the fence and whethei the County
�.t. 4 .i
-�'�„�',,,,, Commissioner's Eieeting 8 July, 1985 - 19
�;3�:=�':'
�r�
�r —�_.� _
. - � .-�,±:
:,� r e :; ,�.. ,�:�
, , ,:.. � ,.�s _ .
< ;
�:;_.��.._�..,��r��°__.� �.::. __,��:-,:;Y:����� ::;�..,.�:���.r.:.. .
aas responsible for its discepair.
Corua Buflding Fiaintena�ce Ditector Jin Belfont intraduced a
Center resolution approving and adoptinq a contract with the Agppn
Sewer Consolidated Sanitation bistrict for constructfon of a sewer line
Line secving the Pitkin County Cannunity Center. E3�lfont explained
th�t the existing seaer line serving th� Center had deteriorat�d
and th�t it was fn ne0d of cepl�cement. The Dist[fct advi��d thaC
a ne�+ �xtension aould b� installed to gerve the Centennial Pcoject
thts year, and that the Co�unity Crnter r�pl�cement line cnuld
be inciuded withfn thp scope of Chis project. The t�ngineecing
work for thig ptojecc has been accor�plished and sufficient funds
M@t@ budqeted; iC uas �ntieipated th�t the replaC�ment line would
be iectalled by the cnd oE this r+eek.
� Asaiutant County Ateorney Gacy �sary explained that water
engineec Jim NrLauqhlin h�s requeurrrd, on behalE of th� Diatcirt,
araen�nentg to th�r eontrac�s th� enntcact ahould apeciEy, for
inatanre, that ehe Diatrict wnulci own the replaceraent linp upon
ina�alla�lon, anci thc roneraet eoat ahould be inereased by
four thousa�d dollars, fnr a total projece coat of twenty-nine
�houaand doltat� (S29,0001 . 'twro Chousand dollars (52,000) in
edditionai Eunds waa neeessary for engineering coato lneucted by
che �lseriee and � ewo thouaand dollar (S2,000) cseacrvQ ahould be
eatsbliahedi ehe reserve kas propoaQd so thot, in ehe ovont ehQ
alignment of thcr ccpl�cemene llno conEllcted wteh olbetr exiating
utility linoa, noceositotlnq celocarlon ae additional coat. or
aomo othor conatruceion problema acoae, suEflcinne funde would bo
availablo to allow !oc auch in a tt�cly mannoc and in bbc abaencc
oE Eormai Ooacd ap�roval. Esary notQCl ehat ehts projoet vaa
accomplished on a aole rsource pcocuroment basia aa �ubetantial •
oavingB would be realizecl by tmplomooting the pcoject coi�cidene
wtlh the Centenntal aewer linc projvct.
Madae� notod that tba coplaeca�ont sewor line could also
serve the nunker [.onghause (�C�1jQGtJ i! lhis was �ho caso, ho
auggostcd that Hunter uonghousv �harc in thc cost. Bsaty agraed
Eo �ev�ow this isaue a�cl co adviec tha 8oa�d accocdinryly.
Child move� ta approve the regolution subjact to the [olloainq
amendma�tss
a. tha rosolution xould approve the contract in a focm
csubstancially the same as that sub�oitted for aoard
review today subject to approval as to Focm by the
County Attorney
b. the contract wauld be amended to reflect a total
project cost oE twenty-nine khousand dollars (529,000)
a. khe contract would be amended to i�dicate the sewec
line would not be conveyed to tbe County upon construc-
tion; rathee, the nist�ict would retaia ownership and
certify to the County that the line was constructed,
ipspected, operating, accepted and maintained by the
D18t[lct
, Hadsen seconded a�d the motion passed unanimously.
Aspen Airport t3anager Dick Arnold introduced an Addendum to the
- ease Use and Lease Agreement entered into with Aspen Base Operation,
� Lease the fized base concessionaire at the airport. The Addendum,
,� .= Addendum requested by Aspen Base as lessee, would amend the rate schedule
�;.,.":..�;
_ previously approved by the Board for fixed-base operator services.
Specif ically, the change would simplify the identification of
�;xl�;- � aircraft by distinguishing 6etween single engine, light twin,
y-i.r•-�.
:f�.3^�'i_'�'
_4.�.;_,�� Commissioner's Eleeting 8 July, 1985 - 20
�-r.,..
:=�-"
' '=�_:�
r�,,,� r�
:��
� � �
. . x.,
r - r a
'��°` � �� � �. r -.
.. _ � .l.? .X+"�►[l-� -.{�..s.. ���' ,. '�'`"y�' �'i j t°-? � ���. t't����s-w?�� ..
. n.�.�ai�z�.,�i..'.. . i�:...�.�+"i�: �t .
heavy txin and jet, and large jet aircraft; the existing schedule
only identified single enqine, twin and jet airccaft. The cate
schedule changes proposed aould apply to hangar and tiedoan
rates, and Would not result in an increase fn rates except for
heavy twin/jets and large jets. The rates Were consistent with
those assessed in other airports, and Arnold recbamended app�oval.
The ceque�t aaa submitted pucsuant to ehe tecma of Che Use and
Lease Agreenent, Which ceyuieed F3oatd approval for any change in
the rate schedule.
Child cxpcecsed aome concern that thc rates pcopoucd may be
disputed by usecs. Aspen 6agc Opecation manager Ccaig Ruggee
pxplained that the rateg pru��e� represented an insubatantial
inarease that would only �pply ro heavy twin and jet airccaft.
The faea prupoaed werc cnnaisrent with indu�try gtandat8s.
Chi1d mnved ro authorixe ChQ Chair to ex�eute the Addendum,
ttadsen sh�onded and the notion pagaed unani�ougly.
Hilla Gary Eanry introduced a itutuol Reloaae oE Clalms to be
Land entcred into betwcen the Bnard, t•taltec 8 Mills a�d Paul e Rodden.
ExChanrye The Doard previou�ly outhorizctd, purnua�E to ordinonco, an
Releaae Exehange Agceeaent that would prov3d8 Eoc the Qxchango oE Eorey
(40) oE the atxty (GO) occae owned by Mllla/Rodden locaeed ae eho
lnectraectton o[ liruah Cceek Road and Nigbaoy 82 Eoc approximaeely
t�n (10) acraa oE lAnd owned by rhe County and ateuaeod adjacont
to the hpapital. Subscquenc to the appcoval o[ the exchango
Agreemont it waa note� that the Hilla/ROddon propeEty conelated
oP only filty-seven (57) accoa and ehat, duo to alope ceduction
raqulrementa, tventy-ssix (26) acrea voulcl havo to be cetained
by F111ta/Roddcn, tn lteu of tho twcnty t20) ociginally propoaed.
to constituto a lagal aingle tarotly lot. Aes twenty-atx (2G) acrea
were aacessacy Eor a singlo Eaa►ily homestte and as the total
parcol contalned ElEty-save� (57) acces, the ounera could only
convcy thirty-one (31) acres to thc Coun�y in lieu oE the Eorty
�40) requiccd by the Agreement, and a preliminary appratsal
ndicated that thQ tvo t2) excbange paccoln xould be ol� extcamely
unequal value, ?he �elease submitEac� �or Aoard [RV�QM today would
relvase and discba�ge all pactics from any and all claims arising
from, oc associateci with. the ocdinanca and �xchanc�e Agreementi
tbe terms of the A9ceenant coulc3 aot be co�►��lied with given the
above anc3 the Agrecmant itsalf uas unenEorceable, and on tbis
basia the Release was submittad.
Klanderud moved to autharize and direct tbe Chai� to execute
the selease, child secanded and khe motion passed unan u►ously.
HAA Ga�y Esa�y fntroduced a bicense A9reement to be entered int4
[.ic�nse 6etveen the Hoard and tbe tlusic Associates o� Aspen. The Agreement
Agree would provide for the use of the community center kitchen facili,ties
by the Music Associates �oc the music student meal program.
l:landerud moved to authorize and di[ect the Dicector of
Elousin9/Property Hanagement to execute and administer the Agreement
� ' on behalf of the County, t4adsen seconded and the motion passed
unanimously.
-�_ Veterans Pat Belfont introduced discussion on the Veteran's Officer
. Officer position. Selfont requested authorization to fund the position,
�s� which assists veterans in insurance, pension, hospitalization,
>�"'_ _r: . disability compensation and other benefits, and to detecmine an
.s�.; ::
appropriate salary. The salary foc the position, which has been
,� ; vacant f or the past several months, was previously established
�_.. ��: at one hundred and twenty-five dollars (S125) monthly, of which
at`�''
Commissioner's Afeeting 8 July, 1985 - 21
l++�L'{_.uYjr�i
���j .
�.y
���
�•S:�:,'_.��
• . x,.
�� ,Y� f �
'.t . :. [�,a 1..Y�.,'�.,.t'h. 4 4 i '�-�.`.-.
. � c:� �t �l t� ~i�`'rt_'`_ � ''� s��s��t _
. -� �,�''syr �'�• To ti,�, � ,�t�,r-� eI�' s.4
m����y ��itu:, a �{y����+�
.. nr� �?+w';,T!1".�13�'NS�,-�'� �IIi�K¢'+�ii. . , . ��.����.`_. ..�.�iW ..-��"�R°.�� �.�Y'�w ... .
fifty dollars ($50) pe[ month aas provided by the state.
'fhe Board generally agreed to advertise for the position
at a salary range oE between seventy-five �$75) and four hundred
dollars (5400) monthly. The specific salacp would be deter�nined
durinq the fntecview process once th� specific duties oE the
V�teran's Ufficec, the number of vpterang in the County, and
nther Eactors, wecp identified.
Public Thr t3oard �anvenrd a public heacing to eansider the Aspen/
ltearing: Snoun�sg Nnrdic tterreatian District 5erviee Plan. NocdiC CounCil
A�pen/ Uir¢ctoc Ccaig Ward introdured the Secvire P1an, a propo�31 to
3nowmass cr�ate a sp�cial taxiny di€trict for the purpose oE eutsbli9hing,
Nnrdic prnviding �nd m5lntainin� a free rrous cnontry trail syg�em.
Ree Although a Ccars�t coun�ry tcail sy�tpm wass the pcimacy gonl oE the
Di�erirt dlctrier, it� rreaeion would alud provide foc participation ln
Secvtce aumnrr trail r.�aintQnance. H�rd explained that thce Aspan/9now�►aas
Plan Nordic Council vau Eornad lau� year a�erifieally eo initlate a
erona country cki trail ssysstaca between ehe Town oE Snowa�oas
Vtllagc and the City of Aa�etn. Varioua landowners hrovlded
Qasea�enta Eoc thia pur�oaa, Eorty (90� ra11Qa oE tcalls worQ
naiotained, greater than Eocty-Elve thousand ciollora (SA5,000)
waa c�iae�1 for ehta Ncogram, ehr City oE Aapon purchaaod a
atxty-Ehroe thouaand dollar (Sb3,000) anowcat Eor lcail mointenenra
and ehe Toun of Snoumaa� V1113ge contributed twelve thoueond
dollaca (S12,QOQ) towarda tbe pcogca�a. Tho CounCil, Ln an oEEoct
to natnt�iu �i�� oxiatiny pcogrsra �nd ensurE conlinuod fundtng,
uc.► N auc� ciiat a n�cclal ta< . ... . ........ . ..
for uhiel� vould �c �tjC:1�1481 cv :. ,::ri. ,
RF.-1, anc tha� a nlll lcvy oF crlght eenehss t.8) of a mtll be
asa�saed. The mill Frogoacd uoul� result in an aridieional tax of
, thrce dollacss and fc+�Ey-cNa c:onts IS).AZ) Eor a Ccntennlal two
; (2) bedcoaA apa�tment, faurtoan doll�rs ancl ninety-ftve centa
(S14.9S) [ac a �ypical west Encl hame, i�lftecn dollacs and tvclvQ
cents (SIS.12) Eoc a Snowmass lteleon tI unie, tucnty-four dollars
an� oighty-atx cents IS2A.86) Eor a typieal Starwood bome,
ehirty-tivo dollacs ancl nincty-six cants (�35.961 tor a small
chalvc, a�cl one hundred �nd oighcy dollacs a�cl ninety-six cents
tSla0.96) Eor the 8ote1 Jero�+a.
The Fitkin Counky Finaneial Advisory �3oard reviewed �hc
proposvd_ buclgat Fo� thc Aistcict and its economic tcasibilityt
the Advasory Board supparted the budget proposed, althougb !t
recoame�d�d thak any inccease in the Aill levy require voter
approval.
t�ard noted that there were fifty-six (56) cecreakion disteicks
in the state at this tiwe. Pursuanc to kh� state cecreation
District Act, ao tract of larger than Porty (40} acres in size
vhich is uNed and zoned primarily for agcicultural gurposes can be
included in the boundary of the district without the vritten
consent of the orrner. In this instance, forty-ttiio (421 notices
were mailed to agricultural property owners as defined above;
! of the six t 6) responses received to date, f ive (5 y r eg uested
exclusion and one (1) requested inclusion. tlard Submitted to the
' j record forty (40) letters from various individnals across the
country in support of the ctoss country ski icail pro9raa.
-,: !
-' a Dave t•tylar, an attorney representing the Nordic Council,
- :�, i tequested that the Board approve the Service P2an; Board approval
_:"; was a prerequisite to filing the Plan in District Court, af ter
- which an election on its formation woeld be scheduled. The service
-�r;.•.'�<:� plan should be approved on the basis of compliance with statutory
}:<c'_:-�� requirements.
- ;:�,:;e
��=r;;;''1 County Attocney Tom Smith explained that he reviewed the
ry'�;'�:� Service Plan for the proposed district and that it complied with
-.,;�y,,�,;�,;�; statutory requirements. Some of those requirements included: the
�Sd�
�``r`� Commissioner's lieeting . 8 July, 1985 - 22
�
;;t._-,��
• "),i�
�t 't s
.4 �Pa � �- `.'b„��» 3i-�e'i.`i 3 4 'i •t�+,f.Mt � .
�tS � r .� �" � � �
� -j t .� �"� i �'.^� r:_... �$��f' A.»s'i'`+. �2 ���i�c��y�ti ! .-f v
. . :..n,�t .'ru.F ..ry ._.,......:.i.�+�.....n. . _ r� J....+i.; '�i6�7 . . , _.. .
submission of a financial plan, a nap of the proposed area,
adpquate demand for the service, whether the service to 6e provided
aould be duplicative, Whether the budget for the district oould
support the services ptoposed, and othecs.
Blake then opened the he�rin9 foc public co�nnent. Financial
Advisory 9oard Chaicman Chuck Carleton explained that the Advisory
t3oard reviewed the proposed budget for the district an� Eound
that it Would 3upport the service level pro�osed. The Advi�ory
8oard nade the Eollowing reconnendations With re�spect to the
Plan:
a. eny rill levy inc[eaae Ehnula cequire voter apprnval, a
limitatidn Ehae aosld be C0t181StthC wirh exi�ting !lome
ttule Chare�r reguic�ments
b. althouryM vrry �uppvcrive oE a ncrrdic trail syssten, the
Advigory board Eelt th�t thr �o[rnecion nE a upecial
distcicc sp�ciflrally for �hls service would reuolvr
o uma11 horttan of a mu�h larrycc ivaue, tha� beCng all
C@C[C0t1Cff1�I or�tvttiha and facillr[c�e in qenecal
Nylar explalned �hat the a�er.iol diotrtat uauld be for�aed
purouane to acotu�e, in which caae ehQ rn[11 iQVy could be increaae8
by aeven percent f7R1 annually wlebout votEr ap�coval. Thc�
proponontn of ehe dfatctct have �atabllnhQd a �oximum mlil levy
oE two (21 milln, whrceea o ataeueory limit oE fouc t1) �+i11a was
eatobl�ahod Eor :�il aperlal dlatricta. Thc dtstrict, in the evont
aE [orna�lon, co�ld, �hQn, 1nccQaaQ lta mlll lcvy by scven
HoreQnt (7�a) annually u{� to cwo I2) sallls wllhoue votec approval.
!loc�ilc Couoril b�ard �+enber tlob h'ny�1C was very aupporeivet of -
che Se�vic:e Plaa ancl che rGeation oE a npectal distrtec as
pcoposod. �•�aync ox�lalnod �hat the Council did no! desico "to
itm1� !bo sse�vlcors of tho distcict Eo no�clic tcails onlys norcilc
akiiny was the ftelcl o� experELso of thv Counetl mea�bacs and, on
ehio baait;, tba manyQr� a�ree�i to ptaceod. Alehaugh thare vas
dofinita mecit co an ovcrall rocceacEon diat�ict eha[ vould
o�conpaus a nusnb@r pf recroational aectvitiQS. tharc waa concorn
tbat this ty}x� aE diu�rict wauld dofoc cho proceAC �or a ourabor
ot yva�s given it� scapa. 'iha �ouncil opted to pcoceecl wich a
aordte district as it vAUld p�ovide a limiced servica thac could
be acco�+plished thi� yea�, Anci as thece was expactfae in tbis fteld
aAangst its membecss Gha eauncil v�►s very villing ro co�aider
�ba fucure ex�ansion of tha distcict to include additiooal
�acreationa7, nctivitias.
elake explained that be was genecally suppartive of the
nocdic ceccea�iona3 Progra�r. He was concerned, hoveve[, vith
the proliferatio� of special �is�ricts to fund specialized
aecvices, pa�ticularly as elections foK th�se districts can be
scheduled at times khat do not provide for voter scrutiny. Blake
sugg�sced that the noacd condition Service Plan apProval so that
all No�dic Recreation Discrict elections could only be held on
Gene[al �leccion Day.
� Dick Fenton kas very suppottive of cross countcy skiing
although he felt chat grooc�ed trails wece a luxury that may, or
_ �ay not, enhance the econoc�ic viability of the resort. Fenton
felt that, if a groor�ed trail system vas to be implemented, it
• should be funded by some mechanism other than a propecty tax. He
undecstood that a relatively sma12 minority of residents in the
= County would support a special property tax assessment, and he
- suggested that, at the very least, the Board impose, as a condition
� of approval, the Financial Advisory iloacd recoma:endation that any
� mill levy increase require voter apptoval. He also suggested that
�:,�_ :',
:r ..;.__.j any election be limited to General E2ection Day only so tnat the
��- - process would be more democracic and participatory.
r-'� .4�,.f Toby Morse, who operated a cross country trail system in
-�''� :�-`.
�~; -;.:� Commissioner's Meeting 8 July, 1985 - 23
��.�.�:i�
,c� �13j
.L.,_nr,_-=.�i
;-
. :x:
..�. - ,� s
::. L �Y�� �r,s3"° � `- t -" • fF' Y�'.
Mf . l �. . ' '�3' Y `d.t . ��{� ��_'
.-'_: . •. i �[y� .
R 'G,��y.
�`i lE� . i�. . . ' �"� �Y �� ���,7"w3-�i-'j ,� � .
. . , .:; �_�r;.. �°-,��Fi 4. - ralcq�Pc ' ►
.�. .�.,. �...,:b� •r _..,� v,�.��r'ti.�:. �.....<';.+'�'_J--��r�,.�-� �� .���.>�:.?Se'4=+s.':..t�:�.
, 5nowmass Village, vas very supportive of the district. Atorrison
noted that extensive ccoss country skiing trail systems were
available in Sum-nit County, Keystone, Boulder, and a number oF
other locations, and he felt th�t this type of amenity was becoming
a n�Cessity for a resoct to be cosnpetitive.
Jack Prischman explained that he Was more �afllinq to eontcibute
funds toWards a w�ll run trall system gupperted by a special
propprty tex than a voluntary systen Wher� adequate funding may
neC always bp availabie so thaC trail nwintenance may be spocadic.
Fci�chm�n stxted rhat he supparted thE Shrvice P1an and the
Eatnation oE ehe dis�rict �� �ropos�d.
Uarcy Flink also suppnrted thp 5erviae plan and the cliutrirt,
nocing ehat an eatablinhed and maintained croas enunecy rrail
�}/SC@tA MOUYd [i[OfiOEE� g�nd healCh praeticQS and liEpBryle patterns.
Aspen Club repceu¢ntative 5ro�t tk�vi8aon Eelt that a vecy
nigniEicane poceinn eE the aroes eounecy trati syatem would be
used by tourisses. Ha notced that rhecr hau been a dc�raatic ineceaas
durin�q the page €ev ycara in rroaB country akiing by toucises in
thia area and he Eelt thAt a trall ay�tc�a ahould be eonatcunted
ond maintained Ln the coa�a►unity. oavidaon aup�octed tho Eora�akion
oE ehr diaecice �nd the Secvice Plan aa ssubmieted.
tfiard cxplalnod thae the Nordic Cou�cli cevlewad varioua
Einanrinc� mathods ea sup�orE thc trail system pcopoacd. Punda
pcovided puraua�a eo inlergovernmoneal nq�camont was not conaLderecl
a atoblo methorl ass thore waa no long recra aecurleyi nalee tax
covenuc, oltMough eoneidoced an a�propriatQ mcchanism, coulcl not
be utllized gtven the aoven perce�e t7i) seaeutocy llmit that haa �
alccoily bcen rcaehed. Funde derivocl pucssuant to a ptopatty tax levy
waa conoldecod ehe bo�t long terQ financing »+othod on tho basia
ot seabillty.
Joan Nason, repra�cn�ing a fundraising/warketing ttcm in
D�nver, used the eros� aountry trAil syatcm last ycar and �be
ouppoctad the Servicc Plan a� au4mitled.
Mark ao�aph, o+rner of Thc Nub, noc�d that a substantial
amount oE real pcapecty tn tha Roaci�g Fork Valley vas assoeiated
uith Eourisw, Josseph explained that hc has noticcd, du�inq the
pant fQw ycars, a �ubstantial i�ercasrs i� de�Einarion toucis�s
khat have selec�ed tha Aspen area specifically for esoss country
skiinq. He felc that the Service Plan +rauld assiat the ovesall
econoc+� af tbe cama�uniky and he supported it on this basis.
Rlake noted that he vas contacted b� Keith Gong of Aspen
Sports, vho requested that the districk expand its services to
provide for a summec pGOg�a�.
Nordic Council board member Bob fruyne explained that tbe
Council did not desice ta be manipulative uith respeat to district
elections, ratheF, it desited to elicit the fullest participation
possible, It was anticipated that a September election would be
• . j schedulsd this year so that the district could be formed, and
` ; revenue geoerated, as soon as possibie, (IIlake leaves)
- � tiylar explained that, in the event of focmation, a five i5)
.�'�� ', member board of dicectocs would be established for the special
- `� district. The directors, all of whose te[ms would be staggered,
� would be voted on during the election on the formation of the
F district.
__ :j
_;:; Klanderud expressed some concern that the approval of the
r;<�:_::;� 5ervice Plan, as submitted, by both the Board and the votecs may
- ,;�_ipreclude its eventual expansion into other recceational activities.
� She suggested that it be specified, within the context of the
�„�'•�• Service Plan, that district services may be expanded into other
r�''''��"� recreational activities and facilities in future.
�'�:�:+,:�
>'--�c.�;x
�'.=z�'t:.' � 8 July. 1985 - 24
;�;��j Commissioner s tieeting
��...
' �}.i:
" "�.s��. �'''*g"".z �s �- > Z :. -
'�-.,. �r �. �
^', �: = -� - ti � •t ;� ��,`��.
� , .:� �2� - �r � �` �y � � s `� -�1' _
'�'r , s6B"L .i�`�t�3''t`� . . . ..s. :#t n �F�Ifk'�L{?� ���+.•+.r�• .. .
��tylAr explained that, althvugh the Secvice Plan gubmitted
for poacd tevieW was generally limited to a cross countcy ski
trail system, such vould not preclude a future expansion into
other activities; additional recreational secvices could be
oEfeced by anending the Plan or sub.�nitting a supplemental Plan,
by organizfng anoCher special df�trict foc that secvice, or by
tncludinq the ttordic Distcict 5ervice plan in anothec distric[.
i•tard sugqes�ed a condition of approval ta indica�e thar,
althouc�A the districr aas propoced priaarily foc the pur�wae of
providing ccos� cduntcy skiing s�rvie�s, thi� c�ervice wss an
inirial eTpha$is �nd oth�r servic�� could be added in fnture.
• ti�cd gxplafned that tne putpoae nf the districe Was intentionally
limited en cross �counrey �kiing �s it wan felt that this partirular
8@CVICi3 ►rould cceeiv� gteatet votec suhpnrt.
Child, artinq as Vi�e-Chair, tMen a�krd Eoc additional
comQnt�l thrr� being nonc, ehe hearinh waa cloned.
Rlanderud rx��l�tned eha� ahe was very a�preciative oE the
efEoctc that hnve gone into thr �COpOIIQC) t��IICCLCt during the past
ycar. She waa conce�neci, ho++ever, with ehe lonh ececm effectffi oE
a�acial �axing disrclets as rhoy cclbte eo che Courtey ralll ievy
1lmltatlon. A nu�abar of special eaxing dlsecic�a havo been
hropoaod in ceeont raonths, including +reed con�rol and moaqutto
aontrol diae�i�ea, the rocrearion diseciet, and a numb�r oE
genernl L�+�rovca�ent dlstrlctat it was lcl� thaC, gtven r@cent
reduc�iona !n qovernravne aecvlcoss, apecial diatcicta with vory
limieed, epeclal pur}�oaea wQre NEO1lEeca�ing. The locmation oE
spocta! diatcices ropcQaQneQd ineremeneal eaxation tn ehe community �
Eoc limleed roason�. while ebe County waa torced, Ae che same
timn, to Ecduec huQOn c�cviccs. [n �ho a6acncc o! tho tnx limitation
i�apoao� on tho County, thc Eormation o[ spectal distcicts may be
�oce appropriato: tbeae cliat�icts, hovevar, incrQmentally detractecl
fro� the abtlity of thc Cauoty to rat�e gencral fund covenucs so
thae acrvicca, and their Pciority, boeamv an issuo. KlanclQrucl
cxplaineci chat tb� ltardic t�ist�ict vas esaontially a tca[1
dis��ict, and it uag not knovn how one could auppoct sueb a
Bocvico, nad an ad valo�em tax to supporE it, at a t�mo when
insuEfieienc funcls wcce availabla �AC hua�an sacvices program�.
• Child uas hiyhly supporcivo of tha dfstcict and the 5ecviea
Plan, I� was �elc that thc ccoss counCCy trail �ys�e�a pto�osed
� would bri�g fa� 9ceater revenue Lneo tbc coc+.�nunity than would be
apent an �he sysiem.
Na�lsen, al�o a t�ordic Council baaGd nemder, felt that the
diskrict should be eskablished for a much broadec gurpose than
ecpss country �kiing, so thak other recreational faciliti�s, such
as s�rimning pools, ice rinks, and okbe�s, cauld be p�ovided. The
Council uas ve�y supportive oF expanding secvices into these
Eields on a 2ong kerm basis: it was not felt, hovever, tbat all
aE these services could be adequately addressed at this time and,
in an effort to secure the trail system fo[ the cor�munity, the
j special districk was initially to be limited to cross country
�-i�� skiing and othec tcail services.
y ;f Klanderud su9gested that the Council consider exQanding into
� the year round �aintenance of the trail syste:�, Ftard explained
that the district could not address this service at this time as
- - the City of Aspen was administering and maintaining a trail
`- '! system during the summer months; special districts were precluded
� ��1 by statute from off ering duplicative services.
-* '"�� ldylar eYplained that the Service Plan as submitted did not
� ,,;,:� include a budget for summer trail maintenance; the Plan would
I
allow the district to assume this secvice in the event the City
�� discontinued its effocts in this area, although additional
�3 ;� funds woulfl be required in such an event. Mylar noted that two
����''�` � 8 Jul 1985 - 25
f���-� Commissione� s hleeting Y.
.a.>
�;
'",., ;'i
. �-�,1.
�7' :e,.� � 7 =y .
�:�,.��i� :' �y :'({ k� .,�_: s--�€e.�"r;► .:=t� - T�$�6��;'�.1.
s s..:.
x� ��
�z j
-. � �y. -
_ ..... � . .a a�*�"°�K�"^+1��17k�k��s.a++ir.# `r''�c"?k'.. �` ..... ��.-..�i�....e�e��_._.. .
12) separate pptitions for exclusion fcom the propoged district
MLte submitted, one (1) by Matthesr Oblock and the other by Robert
and Elizabeth Sinclaic. Ne �equeated that the Boatd dSaCieguish
bptaeen agricultural and residential properties when reviewing
petitfoos fo� exclusion; it Was felt that ail residential properties
shouYd renain Within the district whereas propecty zoned and us�d
for x�griculeural purpose� may be appropriate for exclusion,
�mfth explained that petitions for exclusiom m�gt, pur�uant
to sG�tute� be ceceived no later than ten (10) dayg priot to the
publfc hearing on thp 5�rvt�e Plan to b� ronsiderpd by thp Etoard=
in thla in�tance, only t1�� Sincl�[r petition wag received within
Ehis 11mit, gn Ch�c thce 4bin�k petition aould not be constdpre�.
The petition aubr,,itted by Oblock, te�eived by th� C1etk and
Reeorder on 1 July, 19�5, would be rcEecced co �he aiarcicr Court
for ceviQ++.
Madnen then ranved tn flnd th�i followinqc
�. th�e thece wa�e aufEleiQnt Qxinttng and pro�eceed negd
Eor organized aervicQ in ehe area eo bee servteQd by the
propoacrd dlstcict
b. chat che axfacing servfee Ln nc� araa to be nQCVQd by the
propoaod disertct was inadequate Eoc preaent and projected
nceda
e. that adequaeQ aervlce waa noC availabla to rhe acea
Chrough othec exiaelstg municipol or quassi-raunicipal
cor�o roEiona wlthin o reaeson�blv Ei:ae and on o comparablo
bosLa
d. ehat the pcoposed dlstctet wan capable o[ pcoviding
economicai and aulfleient aervice to ehe acea wlEhta ita
proposad bounclaric�
o, thaG eho area !o bo includcd in CAe psoporsod assert�e
was Financially capable o! supporting the ee�vicas
propoaed
!, thaC Che [o[�+ation o� the proposed distcict waa ia tba
beat interastss AE �hc acca to ba sarvcd
and to approva the Secvicc Plan sub�cct to tbe following amendmane:
1, the definition of the services to be p�ovided by the
pcoposed aistcict �hall be expaqded to encaapass a
bcoadec range of recreatianal services to allow �or
Euture expansion. SpeeiEic lan9uage �or this amendment
shall be prepaced by tbe Counky Attacney, foc inclusion
in the resolution of approval, to be cansidered du�ing
the sul�sequent meetiag
and to exclude from the boundaries of the proposed district the
fallovin9:
� �. the Castle Creek and arush Cceek properties of Robert P
; and elizabeth L Sinclaic as identified in their petit�on
� " � dated 26 June, 1985
aad to refer to the District Coutt the following:
_ - 1. the petition for exclusion submitted by Matthew Oblock
=K"� :�,� and dated 28 June, 1985
:,,rT: -
�.�.>` r..�.
-ti;�
+ Braudis seconded and the motion passed unanimously,
�t
�:�'',,._; Finance Director Tom Oken noted that the district would, in
,� ; the event of voter approval, be eligible to receive one half (.5)
���: of the County's annual conservation trust f und allocation.
'��""�' 8 Jul
��_�� Commissioner's h7eeting y, 1985 - 26
�fi'�{ ��
.`�
.«�'..'%'`'-..
._.__..__._. .._., r�a� �..._...� __ _.� .
. x�'
t 4 �.' �r+ :t ?-..�'t.+� �)� L c.4 � {.z.�.�
r S E� =#� �,t�..��F'���:�`r:
� ?:S,fta,� i'c�w a 3FF.` . j��� � � � sk���l
: � .. p �,r r� - ��s�.�i,�. ty,.. � �, .�d+r -
- . .— . . 'S��!._. � 'Lfa�tT�cv_. . ''°� . . � r����"�w vr" - a.
Public The Soard canvened a public hearing to considet on seco�d
ffeacing and �inal reading a resolntion a:7endirg the Airport ttules and
�ftcn Re�ulatfons pectafni»g to nornfng curfew cestcictfons and provi8ing
Godr for alloked taY.eo�fs by c�ttaiw hot-air bal2oons at 6sOd a.n.,
1lnend: :fountain ii:�e. Airroct t'anaqet �ick Acnold �ubr�fttcd to the
Airno[� recotd hi� �e�orandum dated 29 elncil. 1985, a meyo[an8um �ron the
l:ule�/ Assiceant County e�ttnrney d�trd 3 July, 1'�g5, and thp hfrpoct
!'.�ry'� !tulea ancl h.equl�tidnc �� as:eend�J to date. T'he �,:�enclmcint pcopo�t�d,
initi�eed hy th� tfnicntn t#a�lun:� Cor,sp�iry, would allow hbe-alr
ballotin o�erator� bars�d at the Piti:in County Air�ntt to :ake ofE
�nd lend �t 5ardy �i�ld pcior ed thG a�i�ting �:00 a.m. rndrning
eurEcca, and in no ev�nt prt�r ra G:OA a.�. The am�nd..�ent, r�citead
in tr� entir�ty b�t�u. was inirixte�i su �h5e ballnon opec�racs
; ba3ec� �c tn� air7orr c�uld avail the:��el>�: df �:he eaciy wnrnln�
hnue: a�hc�n z�nllodn ohecotton� wrcc �t � :aaxl;+ur.►:
"32-i.1 Tha nrovi�i�n� dE actCtlntl 2-1fS noterichatandin�, the
Airpore :t3t13€jCC �ha11 hava rhe authociEy to grant
arietan�scrr:+lacion, �ub�ect to reoaonablc condittonu,
eo hoe-�ir balloon operatora baaad at Ehe Air�oct
to takr �Ef fro�r and tand �e Gac�y Pirld belvQOn
• ehe houcc of 6stlq :�.n. and 7:Q0 a.n., elountaln Time"
Arnold cccoxaen�cct ap�roval o� the resolut:Eon aa rsub�[tro�.
, Child thQn o�no�? el�c heatln� Eor �ublic co�+mant, Unicorn
�allaon Co?�aa►y re�caeeneativn Frad Gu[cll explainccl ehat betwcen
eaix (�) ar�8 etghe t�) �itryhtes !►ava alc��dy oceucred, on a te�porary� �
b�aio anci arieh c1�a ahuroval a� nN� Aice,anrt li�naryar, �cory tNa
�irport a� G:QQ ;►.�. Thc tQ;��orary ogerationg uerc alloua� [n an
' c�'tort �o asae�a clie i:+uact� of aa[ly �+orning oparationa ��
adjaccnt �acalie�eia� prioG er� ic��le��nting 3 focmal zu:ecnciaant to
tho Alrpoct Rulcs ancl RegulatiA��, curcll statc� thak he h�d nat
Eaccived any co;.�plai�[: �� a rcault af th� 6:t10 a.m. operaeiAn,
�ho Can�an} ineancle�l eo o�erac� threa (a1 b�lloon fligh�a caeh
fcow thG Tcn+n o� Sna++naas �lillaga. Ria Gc�nde pcoperEy and the
airpoct on � daily t�:►sis. !tc also nota�t thak, nuruuA�t ta FlU1
rcgulations. balloona aus� fly at a c-+ini�up a€ ona thousaac3
' 11,90[t) Peet A�@L'4` ceaiclential area�.
Ghild a�heci Eor additional co:�.^scnta; thece betng nonc, the
hearing ►ras :,lose�i. -
¢tadser� �oved LO approve th� �e.alucian, Klande�ud seconded
a�d the notion p�ssed unanirsously.
apard The Board convened as the 94dLd oF Equali«ation to conssder
Fiqual- agpeals ko r�al ptooerty assessments as deterained by the County
izakion Assessor. Depu�y Assessor Starren Connor er.plaihed that two (2}
protests :rere filed Ehis lea�, one bj Raymond and F7arie �rilley
and the oi.her by ,]une � griedlob, 3r. [3oth petitianers ti�e[e
�okifi�d of today's heacing altbough neither appeaced to per£ect
their appeal; as a result, both netitsonerN have forfeited their
���;:�, right ta appea2.
-- The Board, finding thac none af the peciiioners were present
- - at today's nearing, subsequeatly adjourned as the Board of
�
,,�- Egualization. 2!o action 41d5 taken.
�*.t,::._
..<.-:_i,, ----------
,�-�_.,. .
�-:c�`.,<
��'='•��� Tailwinds Dick ArnoZd introduced a request, subnitted by Tailwinds,
��==: Retail Ltd., to conduct retail aviation fuel sales at the Pickin County
�;�° Fuel Airport. Tailwinds recently �eceived special review approval to
�� Sales construct a tenporary charter service o£fice facility on the airport
�
, �.�'" Commissioner's lieeting B July, 1985 - 27
-:�:�_�,Tk::
..:a
. -�.;.
� . � ,�r��`.��..� „-�� � ,� ��.
.�; _ �. , � ; � �-�
�.. . ...� ��`-',r�X�'�'b�_t'�3y�.i�nw4�-�.--T< . �' �i..,'�.�.k � �`��'��r-eris �,�.�+ .. �
k�quest property pending the eompletion of mastec plan efforts and
subject to various conditions of recocd, nuring the special
revfpw procedure, the applicant also requested approval to
construct fuel storage tanks on the pcvperty in conjunction with
Che ch�rter service facility; that aspect oE the application vas
deferr�d by agreement and the charter facility alone Mas approved.
The fssue submftted for poacd revieN would expand upon that
[equest; in additfon to fuel storage tanks, the applicant has
requested approval to cc>nduct retail fuel sales as a part of thp
�ha[ter secvice. Arnold explained that he reviewed the request and
r�aot�anended d�nial on the folloWing ba�Lg:
a. a a�eeial r�eview applic�Cion for the Tailwind� �harCee
facility w�s appcov�d by the �nard in Dec�mber of lase
years char applicatinn did not proposc retail Euel
gales, [�tMIC� Euel storage Eor gelf-fueling needs only
wag propnned
b. thr Cuunty cnnduc�ed a compettrive bid [1[OCldB for a
Eixed-ba�e opeeacor l�ae y�ar, a rnncessian whieN
prnvlded for the reratl aala of fu¢1. and aubsequently
nwarded a aonlr�rr to a vandor i�f COtA�I LA11CQ with
P�orure�ent CodQ pcoceduroa. Tallwinds particlpated
unsucceatsEully Eor ahat conceasion. te would bQ boeh
un�ust and inappropriate to Ffcrmte rQeall fuei naleu by
Tailwincla at thia tlae, as aueh wauld nonEllcC dicectiy
with thQ Qatabliahecl procedurea upon which TO�IMllld6
ond �il othec Eixed-b�ew opecatoc coa�potitocs reliQd
c, ehe rocatl reluelt�g o! aircraft was ltmtted, hy
neccasLty, to certain locattonn ac �he alrpoct, all oE
vhicb �aa currently undoc 1caaQ to Ghe fixerd-baao
operator. Uae oE thta apace waa only availablc pucsuont
to a aubleaae vith the tixod-baoe co�ceasionaices tho
concessionaire hos tndieAto� �hat thoso ateao which aco
ehe subjoct af thu lease vould not be avatlable Eoc reta U
fual selvs
d. camp arcao not uncicc laase to thc [ixed-baoe oporator
wore �ece�sar� to provide public Access [or al�cralt
taxi/korrin� movomentr thvse areas could not be usad
sately [or stagi�g oc rafueling
e. tl►e rigbt Co conduct retail Euel xales could not ba
limiccd Eo one (1) chastec operator onlyr in the event
the [equest was approved, aPp�oval vould have to be
exkended to all other ebarter aperakors upon �e,uesk.
This uould defeat ct►e intcnt of the cx�mpetikive ooncessian
process. �ould likely result in saEety hazards, and
kbere was fnsuEEicieac land available on the aicport
ptoperty fot such ak this time
E, airport Taster plan efforES were in process ak thfs
time, and it was vithin the context of this process that
additional retail fuel sales should be addressed. In
- the even� the maste[ plan indicated that a second
fixed-base concession was needed at the aicpoct and
- sufficient land could he made availa6le foc this
- - purpose, the Procureaent Code would mandate that a
- competitive process be held for this concession
= - g. Airport staff was in the process of drafting minimum
- _ performance standards f or all airport concessions, to
- - include safety, houcs of operation, land requicements,
�,.� ,, approved activities, and others. It would not 5e
`� ' � appropriate to allow new coomercial activity at the
�,.-=�::
- - airport pending completion of this process
`�"'�-=� �� Arno1H noted that the existing airport lease entered into with
r��''�:��%"' Tailwinds did not allow for retail fuel sales. In addition, the
Y��
���
��,�,�,,,,• Commissioner's Fieeting 8 July, 1985 - 2B
;-Y��,��,
.�r�;._�:�:
� �-�,`.
4 Y �
t �r��b�� {�j� ��k� -.
.�� .. : `'�5..: 'f .�� .
s t ��.- :; . ��� !`,6, ` , � ��,�` � �r j=`a*�. �~ -
� _.. . -. � tv...'�!'!CC:.�. .�..-.�....���_.-.�-��i.z.t:.i.:..•- _ '� '��..�!^c" .i.-. _
expansion of the existing charter ope[ation into this field would
requice special review approval consistent with Land Usp Code
requirerrents, a process vhich has not yet occurred. On this
basis alone, the request could be denied. Finally, Arnold introduced
a report prepared by the airport rnnsulting ficm of Peat, flacWick,
t4itchell and Coropany dated 5 nprfl, 1985. Thp ficm reviewed the
backgcound oE the fixed�ba�e operator conc�s�ion, the coheracts
entered inCo aith Tailaindc an8 the fixed-base opecator, the
services offered by both enriti��, and market denand at the
aitport. The ficm recor.�ended that the Ct►unty restrict rptail
fueling to ehe full servicp fixed-baue operator, and ofEer
limited servic� op�t��org, such as �'ailwindg, nonconmerciai
fueling, oc self-fuelinh, privilegea subject to applieablct County
regulatinns cegarding �afeey, enviconment�l protection, land ue�,
opeC�Cing ptoC�duc�s, and insur�nce.
County ntrocney Tnm Smith explained �hat the iloard adopted,
earlt�r ehiu mocning, a Code acncndu�anr xhereby the Planning
OirQCtor wag suthorized to approvv minoc �mendments �o speciai
revt�w i�ermiess. Ne rerommended rhat ehe applirant Eollow this
pcocedurc Eor che inntallatton oE Euel storage eanks Eor self-
fueling purpoaea. T1�e inatallation oE tha £uel atoragQ tanka
was not a parr oE ehe cctatl fuel aale ccqueut aubmttted Eor
tsoacrl revic�+ eoday.
Tailwin�lu OMflQ[ Dan I�rCacey cx�lainod thot the requast Eor
cetatl fuel €�le� waa c continuation oR the apecial coview
requoae Eoc a eharter operatioo EaellSty. HeCac�y mnintalned that
tho Eix�d-haao operator competed wleh him for chacter secvices.
that it benefited Eron a oubnidized Euol Eacm at the aicpoct, and
that this xaa a �ecvlce vhlch he vao unable to provide, even !or
hta own clienea. Fuel aalee genoracQ o stgot[tcant amount o@
revenuo vhich could be utilized to aubsidtao othec sorvices, �ucb
as Elight school and cl�arter ope�ations. The Eixecl-baoe opecator
vas able to o�fer a bcoad range o[ servicas, lncluding cliscount
fuel prices, ha�gar 2acilitiee, and othor 9ervices whtch Toilwind�
was no� ablc to pcovido. Al1 oF these aorvicea waro subsidized by
�etatl Euel aalsu, ao chat chey eould bo oPfered at lo�+or pcicaa
Ehan choAC establishcd by othcr �hartar operators. FlcCacCy
explained thac hc laased r�ost af bl� equtpmcnt f�om lACal aiccraCc
oxners, and tbat hi� feas ++ore baacd on coac anJ ma�kat conditionst
vithout tho ability eo eonduct retail fual salee, the cost Eoc
his secvices uas highec than those afEeced by the Fixed-ba�e
operator. McCarty felt that he should he p�ovidad the opportunity
to compete xith the fixed-base ape�atar on an equal basi3, and
the ahility ta se12 airctaft Euel at retail vas necessary fot
this pucpose.
Lenny Oates, an attorney rep�esenting the applicant, explained
that Tail�inds has experienced a tbirty percent (30$) de�rease in
6usiness since the new charter facility rras approved. witbout tbe
ability to sell fuel at retail, che charte� operation would no
longer be feasible.
Klanderud noted chat the lease agreement with Tailwi�ds
allowed fo� the fueling of aircraft both owned, or leased hy,
Tailwinds. It was not known, then, why the chacter operatoc was
: � unable to campete successfully for charter services, t9cCarty
explained that he was unable to purchase aircraft fuel in quantity;
for this reason, fuel pucchased by his firm was c�ore expensive.
- Arnold noted that there was some discussion at one time
- on the use of a common fuel storage tank, one that would be owned
- and operated by the County but available to both the fixed-base
�,'�,i operator and the cha�ter operators. A common facility was not
_`:_} considered appropriate, however, as the County would then find
= itself in the retail fuel sale business; the Airpoct Manager, for
�==� `"'"• instance, would be required to purchase and sell aircraft fuel
.�;As;:-_'., ;,
.�;;�.;,�,: as well as monitor its use, an activity which did not occur
'"::!- today. The National Airport Operators Association strongly
•,,r��E.'1
l^� ` - Commissioner's tileeting 8 July, 1985 - 29
.�,�_ry�:
'i,�' _
�:, -
z1'la.,µ+�`�Y f'i, }' . . 1 f :a.�. ,fi �'.:�.:.:-.
'i-( j i'�\ Yy' '�k� � � ".``� �"�R¢``t -�,W�� ���� J
� .-. !yS�-y �.;. i:-` , . ,�''.`�� TL/ `„'.i Pz., yp.����''`'t'I� A�j � '
y� Y
. ., _'}..e.,,,r.tY�e.tS3ew.�`.i'��t?�. '. k..�'_h_.`r+a2_ - - ��t�.'��r.�+.-._-�` .. -.- .
recomdended that airport managers not eonduct cetail fuel sales.
Arnold cecotaanended that TailWinds be a1loWed to pnrchase fuel
storage tanks for afrcraft pither owned by, ot leased to, the
conpany; reta�l fuel sales, however, should be ptecluded.
Oates explained that, pursuant to the �edecal Aviation Act
oE either 1982 or 1983, a second, oc any additional, fixed-base
bpecatnts could be precluded fran an airpr�rt if it was unreasonably
costly, impractisal or burdeesome to alloa for such and if the
ramp area uas under lease to another entity. In thia inetanae,
the ramp area a�s under lease to Aspen gassp Uperation, �he fixed-
bace operator at the airpnrt. �+ho conduceed aitcraEt fuelinry from
[hp ramp area, mailwindc could provide this same sprvice by
Eueling £rom ehoae tie-downs now ieased fcara pspen OanQ opecation,
and the Euel rruck could park on rhe r�mp ace� eo aervlce all
araf t, a pc��tirr whirh r+as used by the Eixed-base operator �t
thig Cime. Oatts maintatned ehaC the Aicpoct Nanaqer rould
provide uuEEiaien� cpare at the airport Eoc a Euel Earm co thar
cetail fuel aaleu could ocrurt this rould be arhieved In �urh �
woy ehst it would not be costiy, butdenao�►c� oc iu�precktral.
Oaters disputpd the repnct prepaced by peat, Mon+lck. Witchell
and Com�ny au It was not known hov in-depth thc atudy waa and IE
its conclubiona wece valld. !le Eelc thc►G rhe conaumer would beneHt
if Tailvin�lo waa provided rhe oppnccunity eo conduct cetail
alreraEe aalee at Ehe airport, anci hQ requeutQd chat !t be
ailo++ed to do aa. Finnlly, he noted thae the Aoocd haa adopted an
Aicpor� Maatec Plan, ancl he coc�ucstod that lc identify futuce
improvomanta ond oppoctunietea so thet uaern of the fncillty
cou�d ptan acco[dlnryly.
Smith ezplained tha� Section 108A oE the Padoral Aviat[on
Acc, rQEe�ce�J to by Uatea, pceclu�ed Ehe excluaive �ight Eoc the
use of any landinry area upoo which Fedecal funde havc been
expondocl. That Seccion fu�thei indicated �hat the pcoviding oE
oecvices at an airport vith a single fixerl-base opacator would
not ba eonalruocl as A� axclueive rlgbt it 1t would be unraasooably
costly, burdcnsoma or impraeeical for caoce than o�e (1) tixed-
baso operacor ta providc such sarvicas anc� fucther. if alloving
a�ore than ana (11 fixed-haAe apecakar ++ould cequi�e tha raduetion
of space 3eaeeA to the extsting Fixod-baso opc�aeoc. Irt lhls
instance a lease hAS already bBa� cxacuted with Aapen pasa opcscation
€oc thc enCica ramp araa so that a sacond cance�sion vould appear
to be pcecluded an the bASi� that such vould necassitate a
ceduckion in the space governed pursuant to an exiating lease. In
addicion, tbe applicant has not yac de:�onsC�ated ehat a second
concession would nat he un�easonadly castly. bucde�some or
impraccical. s'.�ich guescioned the applicability of this Section
of the Act, but noted that, in any event, the Federal Aviatian
Administration enfocced ik, and tbere would 6e no pcivate cau�e
of action foc ics enfocceAent. He also noted EhaC Tailvinds
coppeted foc the fixed-base concession last year and that it did
not protest the cetail fuel sale provisi.ons in the lease at that
time.
. Arnold explained that the land leased ko Aspen Ba�e Opecation
' . was 6isected by a road/cight-of-way atea designated f o� pu6lic
use; fuel Crucks park within this public area, and not vithin the
tie-down spaces, when fueling aircraft, The packing of fuel
` trucks within the tie-dovn spaces vould preclude aircraft movement
and could not he allowed foc safety purposes. Arnold explained
that the ?'ailwinds chartec service has matured and that the
� owner desired to expand into reCail fuel sales at this time.
--- Retail fuel sales would constitute a second fixed-base operator,
however, and, in the event this was allowed, he felt that all
�*i:=i'"` fixed-base services should be provided with required minimum
�-'= '� service standards. Arnold did not feel that there was sufficieat
-��-i space available at the airpott to allow foc a second fixed-base
��;":,:; operator, however, and he was conce[ned with the safety hazards
�r:-G�";��; associated with retail fuel sales by all charter operators given
,_ ,,.,
:;��-�-.._t
��';_:-�=•� Commissioner's Fleeting 8 July, 1985 - 30
T„�_;,.
;�:�°=:':
''i
�„_ _ __ .. _
. -�.':
�+�-� � � f � �
,
.�'� � .j -. . � :� ��3�'..� � �.:,:s,x � ��.� h`''�«� y =�. .
t .:�' �'¢ . �- ...•, 2 y��,� �y{ :.y� � �etc.�j�r� �� _
-... . �i.'�.ei�l,'a?�};t�'�. ' '' ' . '`
�§�AN��LS : .� .�ay�e:i� .,_._ . . .. . _ ."'�w'�'���;i's,e.,<._.a , .
the li�ited space at the facility.
NcGarty stated that he would agre� to comply with minimum
secvice standards providpd they were reasonable.
Arnold noted that Taflwinds has Eiled a complaint with che
E'ederal Avi�tion Adninfstration alleging that a single fixed-bas�
dperato[ Was provided an exclusivp right to a landing area.
Chi18 que�tioned the ability of Tailwinds rhacter service to
pcavid� r,�inCenance r�rvicea, ttcCarty Qxpla�in�d ehat hee cauld nat
provid� ,�aintenance aecvices, except on a vpry linite8 ipve�, as
th�ce was in�uEfi�ienr gp�re foc surh.
Klandecud �id ndE E�el that rhe lioacd uas r�pable oE cesolving
ch� i�gue of a sr�wnci fixed-ba�e o�rator �t the airhnrt at ehia
ticae, �actfcul�rly ac tha mastee �:lan effocts fot Ehr EaCiliey
havp noe ycC asgesf�rd �hla ic�uc. In thce evrnt a t;erand conceasion
waa dte�:ird appcnpct�ee, hw+evrr, �ha tntice �eieetton proceas
uould t�e aub�trt to � cwnueririvr bId in ro�aplianCQ wtth procuc�menE
Code proeeduren. Kiandarud note8 that en��trtal, or r�tail, fuel
9aloa werQ not alloved �ursuanr to the exiflting Tatiwinda leas@
aqcQr�ene, and she dtd no� feel that auch aolen ahould bQ alloved
at ehia tL�e.
NcCacty explained th�t eherQ waa no airpoct dsvclopaaQne pian
avAiloblc at Eh[s ttme thst he could roEoc to for cotoil Eu@1
aa1Q purposea, ancl thae he vaa not aware oF any rrieoclo wiah
vhich he muet eomply !n ocder co allou Eor a aeeond ELxed-baao
eoncesaion. !ia agcoed that a oom�eetelvo b!d proceaa waa approprioee
in the ovent a aecond concestaton waa eseabllahed.
NlcbAel FtcCarthy, an attocney ropro�eortog Aspen l�aao
Opecation, was very a�ueh apPosed Go the Tailvin�s Eequeat foc
retall Puel sale eapabillties.
Aapen tsasa �pQr�tion rcp�eoentaEiva C1ifE Runge ex�laincd
that he contaeeod ticCaccy by loleer in Play ot this yeor and oEl�ced
hia c.+ai�tena�ce, ei�a-dovn, fuel sale and oche� sservlces at ,� rate
. Ehat would maintain cosnpc�itian bctwcs� ehe twa (2), an o[fer
r+bich vas dvaiad. Ne noted ehat Tailwinds has only lost one (31
clic�t tc Aspan Dase, an� that Ehis client vas not enticed with
redueecl caces. Rung� erxplained cbat Ebeca vece substantial
av�chead costs co be PFUPpOCtCd witb retail Puel �ales, including
the waintenance of GFR pe�sa��el o� a tventy-fau� (29) basis, Ne
noted chat Aspen saNe successfully coapeted for the fized-base
con�easion, and he felt xhat it vould be unfair ta aban4e the
pa[awekQrs af thac co�pe�ition at khis tiae.
HcCarthy explain�d that fuel sales xere consideced the
economic hea�k o� che iixed-base concession. He ao�ed khat
' tfeCa�ty vas pcovided an oppo�tunity to caepete For the subject
cuncession, an oppoctunity wbich was not successful, and he felt
that it would be inapp�opriate to provide for a second fised-base
concession on this basis only, HcCasthy explained that he has
researched aviation lau and that he concorred vith the cecoamenda-
1 tion af the Aitport btanager; all of the available space at the
- - ? aiCport for the staging and fueliog of aircraft was leased to
� Aspen IIase Operation ai this time, and the approval of the
, � Tail�rinds request would require the reao��al of sooe of this space
---; in contravention of Section 308A.
?,-� County Manager John Eldert noted that the appcoval of the
-. _ j request would provide Tailwinds with the opportunity to conduct
retail fuel sales without the burden of providing all other
� =�.`':� fixed-base services.
-�`����f" Oates asked if the County Attorney wncurred with tacCarthy's
'`°�`°- recommendation on the applicability of Section 308A. Smith stated
�'°`�"".`� that he did.
..�...
,..��y'^.o->.,
�•;
'�.��.
:�;��`-<_; Commissioner's Meeting 8 July, 1985 - 31
�'�°�
-;,:�
, � ��_
� - ;,
::�.
� ,�.� ,A s� �.�t :a° � ��e�,
.,���¢'� `� _ �v� 7' t s Cy,,�FA-�"
'�.f ���_��t��?�. -��'R s �.a� � I t �.
,
�: r .-. �ai W ' _ .
.. ty, � ^ � '�� . :" '
. . . , . , ` ' �. ..
. �.+'T:l��- .. .... . �. . ' �e . .�. � ... �-. .
. .. �.. � _ . .::. ..#.c�aac:.sah-�.
Acnold expiained ehat thet� was an adopted masttec plan for
rhe u�e ancl developroent of the airparC property. The pian was in
n�ed of m�jor revisions. however, a plannec aas Cpcently hire8
specificaliy for this purpase, and federal funda w�ce provided to
agaigt in this effott, He noted that, although thece vae no
logical filChOd to upgtade and expand chartec service ape[ation�,
auch as �nilwindg, w3thin thc conCexC of the mastec plan ar this
Cime, the plannpr wag hired gpeaificaliy to addteas this issue.
Until surh a tine a$ minimum speeifications, archieectural
cequic¢menEa aad othgr mastec pian impcovements aere iclentifie8�
he ceeoGrnend@d that rhe regurse be denied. Hagter P1an effacts to
: addr�gs all of the�e isgueu were proreeding, and �very efFoct
would be made to finalize auch as soon a� possible. Acnold
. � request�ad that thg Board deny ihe requeat as reCOmmenda8 abovQ.
Klanderud moved to deny thg request Eor commercial, or
� ' cetail, fuel salea submitta8 by Tailwinda as recor�roended by tihe
' Airpo rt Managers the baais for denial was cecited by the Nanager
during hia ini�ia� presentation. 1ladsen seconded and the molion
pasoed unanimously.
Tbace boing no Eurthsr iweinoss, the meeting vaa adjourn�d.
*
;,_y
>:r _
'�<:^:-�_^.�
,1g.
��"'`�
���
6 '� '�
�� a
�,. �.� .
��.•
�;�y`�
�
����
`:�
Commissioner's Meeting 8 July, 1985 - 32 �
"��•,
*= -
1985 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PUBLIC HEARING EXHIBITS
July 8 Land Use Code Amendment A Memorandum Dated June 24, 1985 from Alan Richman,
Public Zone District Planner,to Board of Coun Commissioners
Aspen Community School B Memorandum Dated July 8, 1985 from Cindy Houben,Planner,
Subdivision Exemption/ to Board of County Commissioners Note: Minutes refer to an
Growth Management application,but unable to locate exhibit at time of final record
Exemption/Special Review compilation
and 1041 Wildlife Special
Review
Joseph and Linda Edwards C Memorandum Dated June 18, 1985 from Cindy Houben to
Em lo ee Dwellin Unit Board of County Commissioners
D Letter from D. Stone Davis and Susan J.Davis to Tom Blake,
Chairman Board of County Commissioners
E Letter Dated July 5, 1985 from Whipple Van Ness Jones to
Board of Coun Commissioners
Service Plan for the F Memorandum Dated July 8, 1985 from Tom Baker,Planning
Formation of the Aspen Office,to Board of County Commissioners
Snowmass Nordic Recreation�
District
G Letter Dated June 20, 1985 from David Myler,Esq to Tom
Smith,Coun Attorney
H Memorandum Dated June 25, 1985 from Chuck Carleton,
Chairman Financial Advisory Board,to As en Nardic Council
I Letter Dated February 6, 1985 from Brent Waldron,Coates Reid
and Waldron,to Jeff Ti ett,Ma or Snowmass Villa e
J Letter Dated Apri130, 1985 from Jerry Blann,President,Aspen
Ski Com any,to Crai Ward,As en Snowmass Nordic Council
K Letter Dated June 28, 1985 from Matthew Oblock to Board of
County Commissioners
L Letters re:Nardic Trail System
Unicorn Balloon Requests M Memorandum Dated May 24,and July 8, 1985 from Gary
Esary,Assistant County Attorney,to Board of County
Commissioners
N Memorandum Dated Apri129, 1985 from Richard Arnold,
Ai ort Man er,to Board of County Commissioners
Tailwinds Request for Retail O Memorandum Dated July 3, 1985 from Tom Smith,County
Fuel Sales O erations Attorne ,to Board of Coun Commissioners
P Letter Dated December 28, 1984 from Dan McCarty,Aspen
Charter Service,to Richard Arnold,Air ort Mana er
Q Memorandum Dated July 3, 1985 from Richard Arnold,Airport
Manager,to Tom Blake,County Commissioner
R Letter Dated June 19, 1985 from John Eldert,County Manager,
to Dan McCarty,Tailwinds,Ltd
S Letter Dated April 5, 1985 from Jeffrey R. Lewy, Peat Marwick,
Air ort Consultants,to Richard Arnold,Airport Mana er
23
!!ElfORANPUM
�._...� � _ , .
T0: Board of County Cor��missioners EXHIBIT
FROM: Alan Richman. Planning Office •-• • � �S�
,--t,. �
RE: Publlc Zone District
DATE: June 24, 1985
_-____�______________________________________________________________
INTRODOCTIOfl
In 1983, the BoarB of County Commissioners adopted Resolntion 83-�9,
establishing the Public zone district. The Board found that "due to
the unique nature of pvblic uses . . . there is a need for a new z one
district in Pitkin County which will more appropriately accommodate -
these public uses " . . (and which can) . . . "be an important tool
in the long range planning of Pitkin County and the location of public
uses."
Despite the above findings. the tool which kas created is, in Ty
opinion, of little value in recognizing the unigue nature of such uses
and the need for integration of such uses with the County's comprehen-
sive plan. Essentially, the zone �s intended to replace the f ormer AF
or residential designations applied to such uses. bnt then makes all
public uses a use by special revie:, {except f or "accessory buildings
` and uses" and °bus stop" which are uses allowed by right). Further-
more, the zone identified only a very limited set of uses as even
being eligible f or special review. In essence, the concept of the
zone was only to consider a very tra8itional set of public uses as
' appropriate to the district and to excludF any innovative uses which
the public sector might propose.
As you recall from our discussions with t'ie Skiing Company, special
review makes it difficult to respond to day-to-day problems with a
facility by reguiring that each and every change go throu9h the 90 day
review procedure. The procedure also makes it difficult to plan long
range changes to facilities by imposing a one year expiration provi-
sion upon all approvals grantad.
In my opinion, many o£ the arguments made in favor of the creation of
the AF-SKZ zone also apply to the Public zcne. It would be desirab�.e
to have the public sector master plan its facilities and obtain
approval for its proposals on a comprehensipe basis. We believe that
this approach allows for decision-making on a more informed basis and
will give the County and other public bodies the flexibility they need
to meet public service needs. . �
PRO1'OSED APPROACH
The Planning Office has worked with the County Mana9er and County
Attorney in developing this Code proposal and has also consulted with .
representatives of �he hospital and airport. We believe that we have
reached a consensus on our approach, and have also received a unani-
mous recommendation f or approval from the Planning Commission.
The key aspects of the approach are as follows:
1. We propose to amenc7 the use tables to significantly broaden
the uses which are either allowed by right or by special
review in the zone. For example, uses such as automobile
lots and garages and hospitals are allowed by special review
if they meet the definitivn of "Public", to be discussed
below. Furthermore, uses such as professional offices or
restaurants are also allowed by special =eview in the zone,
only if tt;^y arc zc��ssory to and ��ec2s��ry ior a pubiic use
(i.e.. the restaurant at the airport or a doctor's office) .
2. For any use to be permitted by right or by apecial review in
the zone it must meet all five etandards contained in the
definition of "Public" in Section 3-1.10(b). To meet these
standards, a use can either be a basic public facility or be
accessory to and necessasy for that use.
3. Projects are subject to the growth management quota system
by either obtaining an exemption as an essential public
facility or by acquiring an allotment via competition. We
would expect that competition requirements wonld be limited
to those uses which are accessory to and necessary for the
public use (i.e., medical office buildings, many private
operations at the airport) while the principal public use
would be found essential and therefore exempt.
9. A master plan option is provided for applicants seeking
relief from the limitations of special review. The master
plan opcion is not for the pu�pose of designating use
categories, as is the case in the AF-SKI z one. Instead, the
master plan is for comprehensive planning parposes and
theref ore relieves the owner of the burden of the one year •
'
expiration provision.
�; The master plan also allows the applicant to elaborate upon
!` definitions of uses contained within the Code so as to
`� provide up-to-date criteria for their review. This would
i', allow, f or example, the hospital to propose a wider range of
; patient care services than a traditional definition might
allow, provided that you find such services appropriate to
the use. .
� Finally, the master plan allows the applicant to request
variations from area and bulk requirements if clear and
convincing evidence is provided that the use is unab].e to
function within said limits. The case where we would most
typically anticipate such variations would be the heic:�t
limits t'.:at :^ight apply to vehicie storage znd mainter.=;�ce
• racilities or similar problems with FAR limits.
a
i
SOL�IMARY AND RECUMMENDATION
The Planning Office 'believes that the updated approach to the Public
zone district is a vast improvement over that available at the present
time. By providing applicants with the option of following either the
master plan or special review procedures, we give adequate flexibility
to plan for public needs and address both immediate and long ter.m
concerns. The revised use list reflects to a much greater degree the
anticipated interdependence between the public and private sectors in
the use and development of public facilities.
Following some initial doubts about our approach, the Planning
Commission has become convinced of 'its merit, to the degree that it
unanimously recommended approval of the proposal on June 4, 1985. The
Planning Office similarly recommends that you approve this proposal on
second reading. .
AR.10
2
PLANNING AND ZONING RECOliMENDED LAI�UNG£
3-1.10 PUB, Public Zone District
(a) Intent
The intent of the PUB, Public 7.one Distrfct •is to provide for the
development of public uses, facilities and �ervices for governmental,
civic, educational, humanitarian, health care and other public purposes
which are consistent with the land use plans and policies of Pitkin
County and to provide for related u�es which are customarily incidental
or accessory to public uses, facilities and services.
(b) Use Requirements
Use reauirements in the Public Zone District shall be as set forth in
Section 3-3 of this Code. However, for any use in the Public Zone
District to be considered allowed by right or by special review it
must first be found to meet the following definition of public, or be
accessory to and necessary for the public use:
;
; 1. Use provides basic or fundamental services on which the
corununity is dependent for supFort;
;
� 2. Use is available to serve the aeneral public and serves
` princioally the local cor.urunitv;
� 3. Dse meets an essential public purpose which is not adequately
p.covided by the private sector;
. 4. Use fulfills the functions and obligations of a publicly
elected body or is mandated by legislation, ordinance or
statute; and • '
n� _ .�.,. _ .` �,. -
.. . .. . . � _. _. _ .._ _ _. �.. _ ., .. ...,. ... i, .,.., .. ��....��. .
� (c) Area and IIulk P.equirements
Area and Bulk Requirements in the Public 2one District shall be as set
forth in Section 3-2 of the Code.
(d) Effect of Growth Management Ouota System
m:lf' CC•.^•��t.CUCiIC�I: C•i �:i?' "�CUI�?Ct 1S` t�GC.• �'Ufl11C 70i1@ T1�tC2Ct. ::f':':._ �"'
su�jec: .o the a:�plicur�t 's abilitv tc, oL-tain an allot;-:e:�: cr a�
exemption from the Growth Management Quota System by meeting the
provisions of Section 5-510 of this Code. Any project which cannot
meet the test of being an essential public facility, according to the
criteria of Section 5-510.2 (e1, or cannot otherwise obtain an exemption
from the allotment system, but is accessory to or necessary. f.or the
public use and is, thecefore, allowed in the Public Zone District,
shall be required to obtain a development allotment under the provisions
of Sections 5-5-10.5 or 5-510.6-of this Code.
!e1 Naster Flin n�tion
(1? P,f�pli�ants in the Publ.ic Zone District shall have the o{?tian o[
pursuing a master plan for the comprehensive development of.public lands.
rather than having each use on the parcel be subject to the limitations
of the special review procedures identified in Section 3-6.3 of this
Code. Arplic�nt� takinn this onrion shall obt�in ��nroval. f�r a
:-,a:>:� r r:l::n �:•��iri-� cc��:.�!r��!�: r.r•i�•r:!}• ._,.,irc�c•.��� all c-xi�;t.in<� f,�ci : ir i� .
and which identi[ies all E>rcpo:,ed tuture development which is to occuc
for at least the next five years within the parcel. Provided, houever,
that applicants may elect to designate portions ot the parcel as
continuing to be limited by the procedures of special review while the
remainder is subject to the master plan if the Doard finds that
circumstances prohi5i� th:. applicant fror,� compret�Eiisively foreseeing
the entire future use of the parcel.
_ �.�
�.r�.� . ,. ._.
(2) U�se and area and bulk requirements for applicants pursuing the
Master Plan option shall be as set forth for the public zone in
Sections 3-3 and 3-2 of the Code respectively. Provided, however,
that applicants pursuing the Master Plan option may propose lan�uage
to elaborate upon the definitions of use cateqories contained within
the Code so as to more specifically define the unique characteri�tics
of their particular project. The approval of said definitions by the
Board shall constitute a part of the development regulations for the
parcel. Furthermore, applicants pursuing the Master Plan option may
be permitted to obtain variations from the requirements of the zone's
acea and bulk requirements contained in Section 3-2 if the applicant
provides clear and convincing evidence that the use or building cannot
function properly within said •limitations.
(3) The tfaster Plan shall contain narrative and graphic materials
sufficient to permit the evaluation of its contents with respect to
all applicable policies and general regulations of this Code. The
plan shall include evidence demonstrating the consistency of its
proposals with the Aspen Area General Plan, the compatibility of. the
proposed development with a�3jacent neighborhoods and the justiiication
provided of public need for the proposed public use. Graphic materials
shall be provided at a scale of not less than one inch=200 feet.
Following is a minimum outline for a master plan:
a. Analysis of Existing Environment
i
f (1) Descrintion of existinq facilities �nd services provicied
on tY,E parcel. Also, description oi relatcd public faciliti:rs
i ind services locateo on other parcels but which comprise the
; total service system to be addressed on this parcel.
! (2) Current user statistics for the existing facilities in
1 • this service system. Znclude both public use of the er.isting
facilities and numbers of employees working for the system.
f3� r�alu:ticn c�g �}:e site'^ �;tur�l �.^.virr.•�r,�.r.tal �e,_t•��r�_ , .
a...�.. .'1��:_:: �... •..ja..;:�:e. lu:.•.::� 1;;�-i:tt.l::�' :JL:_ :!!.:. 11f.^.1: . . L��
� vEC,etacior., budie� �L e:�ter, slope, r.rz�inage at:c; nazarc.s.
(9) Description of the site's man-mac3e features, and those
of ad;acent lands, including but not limited to e>:isting
� buildings, ir�igation ditches, utility lines and easements,
! bridges, culverts, drainage and sedimentation systems and
mines or mine dumps.
t?. Prc:co<<•.. �'i�trr= ....:irc•a^�nr:t
(1) Statement of the goals and objectives of the develcpment
, proposal, including how the proposal complies with the
definition of public included in su�bsection (b1 above.
(2) Layout and description of proposed facilities and services.
(3) Identification of compliance with area and bulk require-
ments or justification of request for variance from these
requirem�nts. Proposal for any specific use definitions whi.ch
tr,.�;' .. rl�, tc� tfi^ •;•oiccr..
{4) Proposed utility, drainage anc! roaci service plan fuc t.iie
project. .
(5) Number c�f employees reguired to serve the. pro�o�ed
d c•a�]o►;;�:c�r:: . .
(G) St.atement oE the prvposed schedule of develuF?r.ic�nk,
including the stages in which the project will be built and •
the date rihen each phase will begin and end, or the pl�-�nning
thresholds which will signal the start of each project ph��e.
(4) The procedure ior review oi the �faster yian shall be the s�me as
that de�cribed in Article 6, Common Procedure, Section 6-3.4 of tt�is
Code.
i ' .
i (5) Following the approval of the Master Plan, the plan, (including
a all conditions of approval �nd representations of the applicant) shall
constitute the development regulations for the parcel. Substantial
;: amendments to an adopted master plan shall constitute a new application
and shall require a repetition of the review procedures contained
herein. Hinor changes in the adopted master plan may be authorized by
�: the Planning Director without additiona2 public review. The criteria
for ceview of amendments shall be the same as those for amendments to
special review permits contained in Section 3-6.3 (b) of the Land Use
Code.
F
i
6
f
;
�
F
ji
�' ,
�} �
t.
4
C
f
i
�
� .
t -
1 .
1
i
I
f
�
i
.
d
i
f
J T T •
� �O � J�M MN N N N N N V� N �
H �� \♦ a� \ a .na m a, \ '^� 4 ° 4 1ti �� � �
�h a�
� y w
�� r.
y �� <N►6 6 C G G 6 Y 6� 6 ��� „ � � 6• Y 6• L
Q��
�^ 1
�9
� �f�
<N 6 L L 6 N N 6 M Ol �LL M b G N Y 6 6 G G 6 ,
a� �a-+� �f� s � �
0 y ,t
�m =i � � <h<« < s �r s « < aa < < < o» a « s �
m�
E� ,��� i
r <n<<< < < << s << < s s < a < m< < << < I
Y v V �v y
=�3 a �j u � <a«< < a <s s « c ss < a < wm N pN c � j
O�C � o ' I
{7 O
`7�m v� , � <W�6 G < <6 Y <t < G 6 < 0 < b 1A M G G <
� (
drnE �6 i 9
�` � J � <M 6 0 6 6 <6 6 << < d Y1 M G N 6 L L L L L 1
��� � ' • 6 +
'�� .O �^ 1� <p W 6 G tll <V! 6 << < W N G tll Yl 6 6 6► 6
d d - -% p `
3'� • � sJ
C�Y i � O O 1� <N N 1 G 6 G <W 6 << < M Yl W i 6 L 6 G 6 6 -
�O� � �
� p
°m° �9� � `
9Q��l N �a 1 • <q 6 G G 6 <G 6 << < �6 6 tll < M C 6 C 6 L G
, E�`°_ a°d r� �
{ p L� y� i <m n s s s �s s w< < n n n s s s> c . >s n
� u;� n
� �
/ a.�� J � <Q�6 G t G <6 6 N< < L> b G ► 6 6 6 6 6 p
4'� �
� ��Z A
W V 6 R tlq N N 4 G <6 6 N l < G 6 % 6 p G 6 6 L 6
! V V� i
i, p��� �� F°6 Ys s � � �Ss� ��5 Ea�e_� 4�� .
q�N¢ �� I F 5� x� i "s � _� _ �'i� e'o '_� a £�� .
$ � .} .3 0�E S�
, o at� �i ��i$E : � : y�Y • o��s� fF� s.`�ic°�3� g�� i
� 0 C�O 07 to �4 -2`��� t o �`- � $��Y� � -'�o ����a� 8€=
� e�nn j g p�a' S �€ S r.� 3 s5:. gS= p.' �„e
} �o m� � g f� �c e�•�s = 3F � 5- y ^ �"� Y 3€��B'e�$� o �s-
( ma € l � ' F�33 y tS °:R : 3 Y�� S_ �w �a=�° ° �s€E�
g Lo 4$ �3 � SL
���a � � .•' a f �Y:_� £3 _aS 3 �'�� � € g°s�o �ER�Q��s�; o s°�g
e � =,F - 3 8 �._• '
d mt r S � - I 1 SI i = � IP v ��E��i. �So�' �E I.�,..;I:B �g�� $�$=�: c :L:.+.:
t's E = � ' I �t � �'`°•. �: € ' -: oiY -�� a ae�3's".�e "s=°:�'�o°:a =- ���
�co N ma E g : � a &$: °sy.e �.� � S9 0 ��a= . �� 8£8 x€ 3��-g-a��S g;�3�
�� 2.d �ig�� �o iSY �£ : � �3 �10 �E�L1 Y� E E S=�2ci Y=a�= .
gm�n .?E �E;d dZg � ..3= y£ �� :��x ��� � sg='-�a Es e5'� r Sf�t= oe
rv a R sE� " i f- s3�c:�:�a: ea YE° -r s.-a��za � a r�g
¢aoe�, Y !� r� s �- eY-�& 0 �. n e• R� Eo ��a8
oL w E Y��a�s�t f �€c� ���E �$s;= • �5$5 3'£'�.�2-�g g!���:�=�€gs:��C���"$z 3i5:
�°� � � +yX 8 0 8gs�°FS:f��3t$` �i� �: ' S :xs: �F�zo�ea:e7
m � i3� fs �i� ; Yis€�E� _ , u"s'o�� g<uo'a���'���d��� 8a3=�-ot°.Y
L•_ ar1'�a s dy:i ,�i e`i' C
ei1-min ��'�S'�oi alIM.R.n�o'g� g� �tea"g t��' s%i��cg'•w�€�:h=�ag�;w���e
e�i ¢= <�n'��wY �3_;.���.��e.. 8�._�.,023....a�i.�..2f.' ���.2i�e .�2_6�a.:.�`�::.
. (
. • + � . �
. �
. � . i
. �� <���� � l� {
. � . : .� .. . � . . . . . . . . . . .. �
xx°xqZZEL�ZLxZ%i.a=-Z�aZxZ��g�aZZ�"��x Z4SxL ��;"o�BL�xZ� �Z. w
leh�k��YS��t:tac==ctNta�- as ���„k�M�k ��k �=-�a�-�7t8 �°i�� �'
���zja�v§=�S�r���A =_�:�fi�����'Eas'' a�9'�� :sa$��c �: ���'�s1` N
�$y:��, � C �n �� S�R .�y�Z� �Y�.. � ��+X3�3z2 e�c � �4�4�°O5 �}i� Y'�43d
i �x�ir ags;3 ;u• � 4-�"=��a,. =8°: �a � � R 3g;�`�i� -:3 ts•sas
a�� R4d 9 g 'g�= ��= a:g� ¢s��� �l o � _ �a'E' �?" �; ��
o���� ; i�d �� $4 g•i s�j� ;= ..$g � � : ag Q��q „ g
��533a.i - :9 �'�a '�� ��?- S�y�� a � n a ����°�'�t �
� '� a � i 4;d RQ 3=ai s a�3i ` � 3: � -° a,e3 d 7�o � s
g�� ;�"s Yy�� y�zY s e��a a s f � �! �Z a� a g
� :°� d� ���? 8 :Q, ` B ' • a3 :��� � � �
���: t+ �Y�S e 4'e ��=a,°e. a � �8 $ �s �q` � . .
i 'a $R S�3N 'gc:'s_ � = � Y �d ��g �
� � e. �C��. �� ?s. _ � � g �� g.�
S �� m a� 3 � �� �
� S �_ �� 30 � $ _ $ �
-� �ss =� 3 3 �
awe MN earna> >ov s H bNN o ava a a o e � > 9 9>ao �
1 fl1 9 M N N M fl1 M� 1 99 1'l1 N N M 9 O 9 O 1 1 O O O > 9 9>9 O � �
9 9 O 1 N N 9 b N N> >9L >W M N N 1 O O 9 • 9 1 O 1 1 O 1 V V ` ' '
9 V 9 O N N 9 41 N N> >90 >N N fl�M O V N i 1 9 9 O O > > >>9 9 � •
� 1 W 1 1 P p O N N b> 1>N >M >N(A � 41 p N� > G > > 1 9 b>9 b �
�
O N V 9 N N O N N tl1> >>N �W >N M W W W N N M > > > 9 9>V 0� C
1 s
O V 9 V N N 9 b N G> • >90 >N )41 M N N N N q W b > > > 9 9>9 9 '�I "
} � > .
��9 O IO N M 9 tll fl1 N> >99 1 Y N fA 9 O 9 9 N 9 9 9 > 9>N> S •
N �
` a
9 V O O N N 9 N N N> 1 9O >b N N N 1 9 O 1 9 V 9 > a>9� �
L
p 9 9 O N�W N p> 1 99 1 0! N N fA O 9 9 9 b a e O > O V>M> y �
9 9 9 O P bl 9 9 N i> >9 9 �N N 111 q V 9 9 1 9 9 9 9 1 9 1>9 N �
Z
S'. I I 1 I I 1 I I r��
N N �N INrN�p�N,N�N> �>>N >IA >V N N N N 41 N > > > �N>9 N�a��
�� .�SM
�
9 9 O O W N 9 b N tll 1 >O9 >N 1 9 YI O 9 b 9 9 9 q 1 > 9 9>V W ;p
Np
' OO9 9 NNM•ON� >99 OI'I� S9N 9 !NN 9 N V V ; ; 9 01j9C �
•
• _' • '
� j ��� � � �.� r
� . . .� .. . . .� : � �. �.� � �.,� � : � . � . .. .
� . . . - . � � . .� . � ..
. . . . . . . . , ;
MEMOItANDOM . .
EXHIBIT I
... . �
T0: Board of County Commissioners �::::,. — �
FROM; Cindy M. Houben, Planning Office •
RE: Aspen Community School Subdivision Exemption/Growth Manage-
ment Exemption/Sgecial Review and 1091 Wildlife Special
Review
DATE: July 8, 1985
--------==-----------------------------------------------------------
REQIIBST: Subdivision exemption for a community facility, Section
4-2.2(4} ; Growth Management Exemption, Section 5-510(e) ; Special
Review for the proposed expansion of an existing use; 1041 Wildlife
Special Review
APPLICANT: Aspen Community 5chool
�
LOCF►TIQN: Section lI, Township 9 South, Range 85 West; located eight
(8} miles west of Aspen up the Woody Creek Valley.
f
SITE �ATA: The site is 40 acres.
' S�IATER: Existing well.
i
` SEFlER: Existing individual sewage disposal system.
i
� ACCESS: Off Count� Road 18. � � •
PR03ErT DFS�RTVr7�.1.
a. Si�e Description: The following structures exist on the 40
i
acre si�e:
' 1. The main building houses all classzooms, two bathrooms� one
� service kitchen, a central meetir.q space and administrative
� offices. The bui2ding has a g�oss building area o£ 6200
� s.f.
� 2. The music dome has a single coom in which music classes are
� held. This building has a gross building area of 320 s.f.
,
� 3. The grePn dome has a single unheated space and is used
� primarily for storage. T.his building has a gross building
area of 960 s.f.
4. The oatdoor facilities consist of a concrete basketball
court of 800 s.f., an8 an asphalt playing azea of 1960 s.f.
The remaining property consists of 7.9 acres of play ar�ea
! and gardens, and 31.9 acres of farmed land.
i
5. The pasking area has the capacity to park 40 vehicles.
b. Descrfption of the Proposal: The applicants are proposing to
acquire the 40 acre site through a subdivision exemption for a
community facility and are also requesting to be exempt fcom
growth management in order to build the proposed facilities
listed below, in addition, the applicants are applying for
specia2 review approval of their proposed facilities in the RS-20
PUD z one district and 1041 Special Review approval.
Proposed Additfonal Facilities: �
1. Fermaculture/science center - This new wing to the original
school building wi11 have a meeting space, lounge, green-
houae. office space, an employee housing unit of 500 s.f.,
bathrooms, storage area, laboratory, demonstration/exhi-
bit/lecture area, and workshop. This new permaculture/sci-
ence wing will be approximately 6700 s.f.
The applicants are not sure when they will build the following
structurea since they depend upon funding, but they are in the
school's development plan and would like to include them in their
special review application at this time. •
2. Root Cellar - The root cellar will be of conventional design
for this type of structure. Its area will be approximately
450 s.f.
3. Biodome (free standfng greenhonse) - This buildinq will use
only solar gain and composting for its heating. It will
serve a� the primary area for gr�aing starts and winter cash
crops. Its area will be agproximately 1200 s.f.
4. Tool Shed - This shed will be constructed of a simple post
and beam design tygical of sheds of this type in this area.
Its approximate area will be 320 s.f.
5. Livestock Shed - The livestock shed will be a simple three
(3) sided post and beam structure typical of sheds of this
� type in this area.
� 6. Chicken Coop - This structure will house chickens and other
small animaZs appropriate to farming. It will be a simple.
� moveable structure with an area of approximately 2U0 s.f.
F
' 7. Employee Housing Dnit - This housing will be rented only to
� • people Pmployed on site and will be subject to moderate
i income �uidelines restrictions. It will also meet the
county r.equirements f o= a detached employee housing unit of •
� no morp than 1200 s.f. of floo� area and no mo*e than three
j �Jj UCI�CJWII^u.
i
i Mr. George Stranahan is willing to donate the 40 acre site to the
school. Only 8.2 acres of the site will be used f or development
? of the build�ngs and permaculture (Verena project). The remain-
; ing 31.9 acres will continue to be farmed by a local rancher.
i
� c. History: The Aspen Community School �ecently received $50,000 to
develop a permaculture project called the Verena Project. Thus.
� they are requesting to expand the:r existing facilities to
� accommodate the expansion of their science program.
j REVIBFI AGENCY CO!!!lENTS:
� Z.. Pitkin County Housing Authori�ty: In a memo dated 5/10/85, the
� Aousing Anthority recommends approval with conditions reg•arding
i covenanting the proposed employee units to moderate rental guide-
lines and a condition of no condominiumization. Veri£ication
� that a qualified "employee" is living in the units must be
i accomplished with the 8ousing Authority. The uniks shall grovide
rent��l terms of no less than six consecutive months. (see
; at;ached ntiemo}
I 2. Aspen/Pitkin Environmental gealth Department: In a� memo dated
5/21/85, Tom Dunlop made the following comments regarding the
proposal (see attached memo).
Sewage Disposal: The proposed science wing and detached
employee unit will both require individual sewage disposal
systems that must be designed and built in conf ormance with
the regulations of the Enviror►mental Health Department. He
also recommends that low water use fixtures are used to
minimize water use and subseguent discharge to the sewage
disposal systems. �
2
��..�.�..�.W.�»�.,.�..-�...--_-..--._
f
fiater: A filtration system should be installed on the water
supply (existing well). Water storage facilities snificient
to respond to demand during a fire must be installed In
addition, irrigatfon water lines and domestic lines should
not make direct connections in order to keep the domestic
water free of contamination by untreated irri9ation water.
Air Pollution: •
(a) Constrnction - Dust must be suppressed dnring
consttuction with techniques approved by the Environ-
mental Health Department. No open burning is allowed.
(b) Stationary Souzces - If the applicants wish to
use woodburning stoves, they should contact the
Environmental Health Department for a list of clean
burning devices.
School Design: The School shall be designed to be in
compliance with state "standards and regulations for
schools."
Food Services: If a food service is planned, it must be in
compliance with rules and reg:alations governing food
i services establishments in the State of Colorado.
� .
� 3. County Bnvironmental Coordinator - In a memo dated 5/29/85.
; Mark Fuller has the following comments:
i •
� a. That .a professional engineer or geologist certify the
stability of the proposed building site f or the science
; • wing.
ib. That a cnmgrehensive weed � control� plan, including .
'• revEgetation of infested areas be included in fir.al
�cve2^ ,..r.t .,...,.
�r� Y:,
�
� c. That the Division of Wildlife be consulted as to the
; impacts of the development on wildlife.
i
; 4. Dfvisfon of Wildlife - In a memo dated 6/2/85, Randy Cote
notes the proposal will not have any significant impacts on
� the winter range nor interfere with migration routes. He
recommends, however, that the proposed employee units have a
restrict�on against dogs or stric*_ kennel control.
STAFF COM!lBNTS:
l. The Pitkin Ccanty Land Use Code. Section 4-2.2(a) (4? states that
. parcels may be exempt from the definition of subdivision if a
parcel is being created f or a community facility provided that
the exemption conf orms with the policies and regulations of the
Code. The school is clearly a viable facility servicing the
community. 'It has been is►� existence at its present site since
; 1972 and has a planned maximum enrollment of 100, offering
i classes f or kindergarten through 8th grade.
� 2, The applicants are requesting an exemption from the Growth
Management Process. The requested expansions (science wing to a
school and associated employee housing) do not clearly fit into
one exemption category. Instead the project somewhat fits under
Section 5-510.2 (f? and (h) regarding exemptions from 9rowth
managen�ent. It is the Ylatttting Off.�icc oF�inion tl,at � ,+r•:ti•. Lh
management exemption regulations are intended to cover requests
such as the one made by the Aspen Community School. Section 5-
510.2 states that community facilities may be exempt if a
community facility can meet the minimum criteria that it:
1. Provides a basic or fnndamental pubiic serv3ce upon which
, . 3
r
i
the remainder of the community is dependent for support; and
2. Is available for use by th e general publfc and,
3. Serves primarily the local community.
In addition, the project must show that its impacts are mitigated,
including those associated with the generation of additional employ-
ees. '
It is clear that the community school is not a basic or fundamental
se�vice f or the comnunity, however, it does serve the local community
and fs an established school facility.
The proposal before you merely constitute an expansion of the science
program at the Community School and is not an attempt to expand
outside of the educational intent of the �chool. The proposal wi?1
aad a maximum of four �nployees which will be housed on the site, thus
the proposal is mitigating or internalizing its growth im pacts. In
addition, the Planning Office feels that the applicants have ade-
quately addressed all the mitigation measures that are reviewed f or an
exemption from Growth Ffanagement (Section 5-510.6 for an essential
govermnent facility). We feel that. all the necessary issues have been
evaluated and any problems can be handled though conditions placed on
the special review approval.
Although the Community School is not technically a commercial facility
the proposal may also be reviewed under Section 5-510.2 (h) regarding
development of any commercial project wtiich is found to have neg-
ligible growth impacts on the community, To qualify under this
section of the code a pr.oject must have:
. a. � A negligible number of additional employees and said
employees will be provided with housing which meets the
Housing Authority guidelines.� The proposal is for 4 .
additiotiul employees who will all be housed on site. '
b. A negli5ible demand f or parking. The proposal does nat
create a demand f or additional parking.
i c. A. negligfble impact on the community's trail or xoad
1 system. The maximum number of additional cars generated by
the proposal is four. No significant impacts to the roads
or trails would occur.
d. A ne9ligible impact to services sach as water, sewer, police
and fire protection. The proposal can sugply its own water
and sewage needs and will not significantly increase the
need for fire and police protection.
e. A negligible impact on ,the facilities of the RFTA, the
� school, library and hospital districts and parks s.ystem.
The proposal would have no impacts on these districts.
f. A negligible adverse effect on the communities air, water,
land and energy resources. The proposal to expand the
existiny facilities appears to be consi<:tent a�ith :t�e
existin, lonc: use. 'i!-+e site is ef.fici._i�tly e-c:�ign: �.� .c
allow approximately &2$ of the 40 acre site to remair� in
agricultural production. In addition, a portion of the 8+
acte develogment site is to be returned to agricultural use
j through the Verena Project. The proposed science wing will
be topogra�hically scceened from view, the detached 1.200
s.f. �•r.�i�lcyee unit will bc visik�le, hovrevei, it wil? t,e
partially earth bermed to blend with the surroundings. It
will not be visible from the Lenado Road. The add3tional
proposed agricultural buildings will blend with the sur-
roundin9 area land uses.
3. In 1984, a si;��ilar requast waa naue by lhe ds�.zi� School foc the
4
i
. . � �
Deaf. it was determined at that time that the proposal did not �
fall under the GMP regulations because it did not constitute an ;
expansion of activities but instead represented an upgrade in the !
quality of the operation as a whole; the proposal did not hav e I
any growth impacts; the school did n�t operate as a commercial _
business; and construction of additional facilities did not
constitute an increase of student or faculty populations. i
�
In summary. the Aspen Community School proposal mitigates its impacts i
� on the communfty and is an activity which can meet the exemption
, requfrement� for a commercial facility with negli9ible im pacts. In
addition, it serves the local community and can be argued to qualify
; as a community facility. '
� RECOlfMENDATiON: On June 4th the Planning Commission recommended
fapproval of the request for exemption from GMP. In addition, the
y Planning Commission recommended approval of the special review request
1 f or the Aspen Community School and 1041 Wildlife Special Review, with
� the following conditions:
i
� l. That all recommendations made by the County Environmental
Health bepartment in the memo dated 5/21/85 to the Planning
� Office, shall be made conditions of approval.
� 2. That all recommendations made by the Housing Authority fn a
memo dated 5/10/85 shall be made conditions of approval.
3. That all recommendations made by the County Environmental
Coordinator in his memo dated 5/29/85 become conditions af
I approval.
� 4. The Applicant shall satisfy all conditions of approval prior
to issuance of any building permits.
� ' 5. Ldo dogs shall be allowed on the nrogerty.
f
i CA.35 "
�
1
� .
i '
i
� •
�
I
;
� , •
.
i , . . . . .
I • • •
I
. 5 . ,
. • , �
Mstsot�nox .
. r.�/..;�� r- ai. �c , . .
,i�.:<<; r,�
F.11�]'c
TO: Board of County Commissioners :;,� n �HIBIT
FROM: Cindy M. Houben, Planning Office �L��;,t� � � w�
RE: Ec3wacds Employee Dwelling Unit r �'' �
DATE: June 18, 1985
__���__�°____°=__°_______________°____=__________==__________=_____�_
REQUEST: For approval of an employee dwellfng unit.
{ APPLiCANT: Joseph and Linda Edwards
; LOCATION: Lot 13, Block 1 of the Aspen Aighlands Subdivision;
� located approximately two (2) miles southwest of Aspen.
� ACCESS: Existing off Glen Eagles Drives
WATER: City of Aspen
SSWER: Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
EONII�: R-30
I. DESCRIPTION OP PROPOSAL:
a. Site description: The lot is approximately 35,510 s.f. in
size and currently contains a residence 576 s.f. in size.
The surroundfng area is the Highlands Subdivision camprised
of single-family cesidences.
b. Project Description: The applicants propose to build an
additional home (principal resident - 1500 to 1800 s.f.) on
the subject lot and to deed-restrict the existing dwelling
(576 s.f.) f or an employee @welling unit.
II. RBFBRRAL CO!!l�IEATS: .
l. 8ousing - Zn a memo dated 6/7/85, the Housing Authority
indicated that if the dwelling were to remain as an employee
dwellinq that conditions of approval would be those imposec3
on an employee dwelling unit for low or moderate income
gvidelines. In addition, the home must be restricted to a
standard one-bedroom employee housing unit (size require-
ments) . {See memo for conditions.)
2. Environ�eental Health - Bob Nelson of the Enviconmental
Health Office indicated that there were no concerns from an
Environmental Health perspective.
� 3. Zoaing Inspection Office - In a memo dated 6/3/B5, Patsy
Newbuzy noted that the order of construction aoes not appear
- to be a problem.
III. STAFF COMMENTS; �
a. The applicants are applying for an employee dwelling unit
' under Section 3-8.13(d) of the land use code. This section
refers to employee units whicb were built prior to June 8,
1981. This request is unusual in that the applicant would
not qualify to obtain a detached employee dwelling on the
property if a principal dwelling currently existed on the
property since new employee dwellings in the R-30 zone
distzict are restricted to units attached to or within the
proposed dwelling.
b. The cabin has been occupied by the applicants' family for a
number of years. The applicant desires to continue to live
in the cabin until the proposed principal dwelling is
completed. At that time, the cabin would then become
restricted to the guidelines imposed by the Housing Author-
ity.
c. The BOCC must make a determination the existing unit would
qualify under the bandit unit provision Section 3-8.13(d) of
the Land Use Code in order for this application to qualify
for an employee dwelling unit. The application adequately
addresses each of the criteria for qualification for an
employee dwelling unit under Section 3-8.13(d), 1-7 of the
Land Ose Code.
o The dwelling was built prior to June 8, 1981;
o The dwelling unit's exterior is above the 500 s.f. em-
ployee dwelling unit size limitation, however, the
living space (interior) is less than 500 s.f.
o Occupancy requirements can be met by the existing
cabin.
o The applicants state that they will comply with health
and safety requirements, as determined by the UBC and
Building Inspector.
o The cabin, plus a principal dwelling wfll not result in
overcrowc7ing since the applicant has represented that
the principal dwelling is to range between 1500 and
1800 s.f. in size (the cabin is 500+ s.f.) . Thus
resulting in a maximum square footage of 2300 s.f. in a
zone district which allows 4, 040 s.f. on a lot of
35,510 s.f. In addition, the cabin will only be
visible from the two adjacent lots to the north and
south. No additional extension of utilities are
required (except for the proposed principal dwelling
located on the same parcel) .
o The applicants agree to deed-restrict the unit in
accor8ance with Aousing Authority guidelines.
o The adjacent land owners have been notified.
4. Even though this application doesn't precisely fit the
employee housing ;egulationa, it fs a practical request.
The order of construction of the dwellings is backwards, but
this ahould not present a problem with the Building Depart-
ment or Aousing Authority since conditions of approval
regarding the timing of deed-restrictfon of the employee
dwelling can be accomplished. The applicants have adequate- �
ly addres$ed the issue of overcrowding. The only outstand-
ing issue regarding this application is whether the employee
dwelling and principal dwelling must be attached in accor-
dance with Section 3-8.13 regarding employee dwelling in the
R-30 zone district (detached "new" employee units are not
allowed in the R-30 zone district) . However, if the Board
feels that the cabin qualifies as a bandit unit, even given
the order of construction, the unit is not required to be
attached.
N. RBCOM!lEpDATIOp: Since it is impractical to demolish a viable
employee unit and since the applicants have demonstrated that the
impacts of this proposal are insubstantial, the Planning Office
recommends approval of the request given the individual merits of
this application, with the following conditions:
1. Prior to occupancy of the new unit, the applicant shall
comply with all the employee housing requirements as noted
2
,�..�,�.
.!
. ,, �
:
�
r
in the Aousing Authority memo of 6/7/85.
2. The Building Department shall inspect the existing dwelling
and verify that it meeta health and safety guidelines in
accorclance with the UBC.
3. The applicant shall be allowed to continue to occupy the
unit until such time the principal dwelling is completed.
At such time, the principal dwelling ia completed, the unit
shall automatically become an employee housing unit re-
stricted by the guidelines imposed in Condition #1.
4. Dnder no circumstances shall the combined FAR of the
existing cabin and new (proposed) principal dwelling unit
exceed the maximum FAR of the R-30 zone district.
CH.12
. i
3 .
,.W.�-�-.- �, a.. .. ,..�_ � .�.,
r..:_.. .�� . ,
;.
Tom Ria�:e, Chairman ''�' '-� �- ;'
E�oard f o Caunty Commz ssi aners r`,� EXHIBIT
PitE;in County, Colarado. � ^
St:.;�j c� .. �✓
1?:::i. I:...
Re: ED4lAF.I"�S DWELL I NG UN I T
The proposed unit i.s laacated an Lot 1�., Aspen Highlands
5ubdivisian. My family lives nn Lot 1�, Aspen Highlands
� Subdivisi.on. The proposed unit is literally ialmast) in our
bar_I;yard. My wife ar►d I da not oppose th� UP1IT �r� long �s the
followinq restrictions are placed on the Lot iL:
1. Th� IJNIT is limited to occup�ncy by not mur� than iwo
{2> persons.
2. 7he square footege o�f the er:isting UNIT can not be
increased.
�. Minimum lease peri.od wil.l. not be less than si;: (b)
months.
;
We do oppose thp UNIT b�ing place in the F'itE:in County Employee
Ho�.�sing pool . If th� uni� m�.�st be placed under ihe control of
the Housing Authority, wp stongly recommend that the Edwards'
request for the w�ddition�l unit be denied.
• �~ ' . ...��'"'��
Yo�.�r� t�ul y, �.. . �;��.;Y•_
.,.• .
/ �'Si.�����`t�
i / ;' }� 2/� i . . , . .�: , .
` ��
; D. Stan� navis
;
c���-�� ����5
Su��n J. IJav�.s ' �
�
, ;
�
�
i
�
/
WHIPPLE VAN NESS JONES
Box T
Aspen, Colorado 81612
T:..�.�� � - , •
July 5, �9 s 5 . ._ EXHiBiT
, �
� � s
Board of County Commissioners
506 East Main Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Edwards Caretaker Unit Application
Dear Commissioners,
With respec:t to the applicati�n of Joe and Linda Edwards to
have the exi.sting cabin on Lot 13, Block 1 , Aspen Highlands
Subdivision qualified as a caretaker unit, it is my under-
standing that the Housing Authority has requested a condi-
tion that the unit remain rented at all times to low- and
moderate-income persons and that the Edwards be required to
take renters referred. by the Housing Authority in the event
they have not otherwise chosen to have it occupied. Our
subdivision covenants allow guest houses on the premises,
and i feel that Mr. Edwards' proposed use of having his son
occupy the unit or, if for some reason his son should leave,
some other close family friend would not be contrary to the
covenants. However, I believe a requir�ment that this unit
become part of the employee housing pool for the County and
that Mr. Edwards to take strangers on his premises and keep
the unit rented at all times would be inconsistent with the
covenants aiid something that, as a homeowner in the area and ,
as the original subdivider of this area, I would object to.
I request, therefore, that you not impose that type of
condition on any qualification of the unit as a caretaker
unit.
Very truly yours,
��'�.��� v�-��� ��
Whipple Van Ness Jones '
I;• � �
Kg�o�uar� --. Ex�n' �s�'
; �� � �. a�
TO: Board of County Commissioners '' '
,-� .. i�
FROM: Tom Baker, Planning Office
RE: Service Plan for the Formation of the Aspen/Snowmass Nordic
Recreation District .
DATE: July 8, 1965
______________°________________________________________________-_____
The purpose of this memorandum is threefold:
1. To explain why th e Planning ana Zoning Commission reviewed
the plan;
2. To briefly summarize the service plan; and
3. To summarize the Planning and Zoning Commission's recom-
mendations.
PLAPl�I1�G AND SOAII� CO!!lIISSIOP RBCO�!lIEPDl1TIOH
The Special District Act requires that the service plan be referred to
the Planning Commission and " . . the County Plannfng Commission
shall study the service plan and present its recommendations to the
Board of County Commissioners."
SQ!lMARY OF SEAV ICB PLAP
The organizers of the Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Recreation District
("Nordic District") wish to create a public and tax supported entity
capable of assuming responsibility for the operation and maintenance
of a winter and summer use trail system. The pri�ary objective of the
"Nordic District" will be the operation of a system of cross country
skiing trails. The secondary objective will be to participate with
entities already involved in the maintenance of summer use trails.
The boundaries of the Nordic District are the same as the Aspen School
District �1, as shown in the plan provided to Commission members.
Valuation is estimated to be $184,000,000; no tract of land 40 acres
or more which is zoned and use primarily for agriculture can be
included without written consent of the owner.
The Nordic District intends to administer the trails network being
operated by the Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Council, to acquire its equip-
ment, hire its personnel and, additionally, to participate in the
maintenance of summer use trails.
Colorado Revised Statutes limits the Nordic District levy to no more
than four mills; however, the District would like the BOCC to condi-
tion approval of this service plan with a two mill limit. The initial
mill levy is expected to be less than 0.9 mills.
ROLS OF TBS PLlINNII� APD 80NII� CO!!lIISSION
The P&Z approves the service plan in concept; however, the Commission
requests the Financial Advisory Board evaluate and comment on how
realistic the ffnancial aspects of the service plan are ginen the
scope of the service plan.
TB.10
_
_ _ __ " ' Y�� .
ytYLER. STULLER & SCHWART'Z
,�•rroK�FVS nr �nw .
DA�'ID J. �1YLf:R 450 S. GALEN�(. SUITE 202
SANDR:1 �I. STU�I_ER ASPEN. COLORADO 81611
ALAN F. SCH��'1R'1'% (3031 920•1U18 .
June 20, 1985 D ^����
���
JUN 2 41985
Thomas Fenton Smith, Esq.
County �ttorney P���` EXH1BiT
506 E. Main Street �
Aspen, CO 81611 r`�' '
_..,, � ��r
Dear Tom: ^ ?�
��.':;.. ,,,,,.�a-rd�AL 17��-_
,
I have reviewed the Service Plan for the,,or,eation of the 3
Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Recreation District in light of �recent
amendments to the Special District Control Act with respect to
the contents of service plans. From my rc iew, I am of the
opinion that the Service Plan filed meets the requirement of CRS
32-1-202, as amended.
As we discussed, the new requirement for a statement or' Y�ow i
the District's facility and service standards compare to those of
the County is inapplicable since the District will not provide ;
any facility or service currently provided by the County. '
Similarly, we agreed that the requirement �or an escimate of
maximum interest applied only to bonded indebtedness and is also
inapplicable since the District does not anticipate the issuance
of bonds.
With respect to summer trail maintenance and operation, the
District will cooperate with the City of Aspen and the County in
the maintenance or improvement of those trails which will be
utilized by the District during the winter. The District will not
undertake to develop or maintain its own summer trails. The
details and extent of cooperation have not yet been determined
and probably will not be prior to action on the Service Plan.
The actual extent of District involvement and s. mmer trail
maintenance will be primarily limited by the budget. It is not
the intent of the District to undertake summer trail maintenance
and/or operation which would require expenditures beyond those
proposed in the fina�rycial summary contained in the Service Plan.
� nce the other amendments to the Special District Control
act do not affect the contents of the Service Plan, they have not
been addressed in this letter. Suffice it Lo say that the
organize s are aware of the changes and anticipate no difficulty
in complying with them.
,
MYLER, STULLER & SCHWARTZ
Thomas Fenton Smith, Esq. �
June 20, 1985 •
Page 2 '
. Please include this letter in the record before the Board of
County Commissioners as a supplement to the Service Plan.
Sincerely,
MYLEk, ST k & SCHWARTZ
gy.
David J. My
� ���
_ _...
r,of:r,D
�tEMO p,,,,�� �
EXH181T
r. �.�
�:- ��s�-
Toa Aspen Nordic Co�ancil.
1=rom: Chuck Carletor�, Chnirm�an af the' Fir�nr�ci�al Advisor� Ro�ar•d
I��te: Jur�e �5, 198�
F�ee The Fir�nnci�al F'1nr� for the �lorda.c Fiecr•e�atior� I�istrict
7i�e Fin��r�ci�xl Advisor•y Iiaard h�as reviewed the fir��r�ci+�l pl��r� i:c�
si.tpport the Asperr/Sr�owmass Nordic Co�ancil �►y a speci�s]. ta.;ir�g
district with �ar� ir�iti�7. levy of .Ei rnil.ls with �z�lthorizati�r� tn
ir�cr•ease �t the st�ate �allowed ir�cr•e�se of 7% f�lr�din� per yeRr
with ��r� ultimnte limit�tiar� of 2 mills. The district W.O�11� ��'
�he same �as the Asper� Sct�ool Iiistr•ict.
The FAEt l�elieves tt��t the �,l�ar�r�ed 198�/86 proposed b�.►��et i�
re�sornYble ta �io the �,r•opose�l progr•am. However, the FAH mnk.es
the followin� recommen��atior�s with reg��r•d to the �,r•oposed distric�.
pl�ar� ��nd rnill levy�
J.,, The FAEs recomn�er�ds th�at t�e best w�zy to or•g��nize �ara�l
fun�l tt�e cross-cour�try ski.a.r�� progrRm is �as � p�irt uf
i;h� consolid4ted E�luc�at9.or� �znd Fecre�tior� ar•gnr�i��ation
�,ro�osed by John Eldert �znd ti�e FF1S�. Tt�e cor�solid�•t�d
Educ�tion �nd Recre�ntior� pro�,os�l wo�ll� �,rovide the
lowest cost �ar��i most efficient service far the t��xp�7yer<.�
of the co�lr�ty n�d the visitor•s.
2. Feorgani�zr�g the r�eed for the 'F�11"1�].f�J of the cross--
country progrmm �r�d the del�ys ir�herer�t in �rovidir�g ��:
consol idata.or� Educ�ztian �ar��i FEcre��tiar� pragr�sm, th�
FAB recama�er�ds ct��r►ges ir� the praposed mill levy �,l�xr�.
The FAEs �,r•o�rvsnl wo�.tl�i be ta request ��r� .8 mi 11 1�v1
wa.th r�o ir�cre�se without �a vote by the electar•ntea
This �ppr•a�ach is cor�sister�t with t�e county'a r•estrictior��s
nr�d cqr�d�lcive to effi.cier�t oper�ztion �zn�l rn�Yr�r�3emer�t.
If ir� the f�.tt�.tre the Asper,/Snowmnss Nordic Co�.�r�cil.
r�eeds more f�ll"�d5 th�ar� pinr�r�ed ir� the 1985/86 bu�lget,
the Co�.tr�cil sho�.�ld �o t� the voters for• �xp�rov�al of ����
r�rlrlitiori�l mill levy.
cc: Rvard of Co�lr�ty Ccammissior�er�
F'itkzr� Co�lr�ty F'l�anr�ir�g nr�d Zonir�g Coo�missiar�
. . �
, . . . . EXHIB T
• � ' . . � . .
� �;�:;1��] � �..;..�/ :•.y: . ., :.._..��,_ �.�; �: � �( :�. � ,.; ..:.. i
�.!'. N=M ,�✓L�1'�MMa11"w�i(.•��rM:l•1,,.�.] .�.y���� •.il'JYt/•L� �:�:�JL.�I.'1� �e'�iT• S�!�r'.M.'.�{���"• :'1: l�:�i:Iiri.'.LR'�;�••a.. .. •
•7 i"� �7r ...5.. 1�� 1 1:Y.i'J• / �{ ✓::.. 1 . .. . .
!�i�lP��;y 'l.r..r Itt��1-yY.�����r:Ir9....�i..11t.���,��M1�'i�'T , � .1'���'t' �'�` � :�• . �•t • ,
, -• ��•:� , t » . •• . • y ��5, . . • . . � : . . . .
R�ID&VnAIDR�N :. . � � ' . . .
Rcal Estatc•Rentals•Property Management
February 6, 1985
.1 . . .
..�;Mr. �Jeff.�.Tippett . . . . .
' Mayor of`�Snowmass ' • � � , � . .
P.O. Box '5010 ' � '�
Snowmass Village, Co. 81615
• .. �t• ' ' . .. , ' - � � ' . . '
� Dear Mayor�.Tippett: - � - - .
. �
I read�with interest the comments made at._the joint city council '
meeting��regarding public :.funding for the��Aspen/Snowmass Nordic '
Council. This is a letter written in strong support of those mu-
nicipalities funding the Nordic Council. . .�,
� � � -:'�:�`J� . ��
. .' '.'�:::�:L^,...�.._..r,i:�j�!..:�� .... . • ._. � ..�. �r... .::.._: . .�� . , � ` .. �•. ' " '..:. ... .4'�._..'. . . ��• ' . .
.. ..-.:;.,�J1j7Y `�.. ..1� : �.,
I personally enjoy the tremendous network of set trails b�ut I can
speak;"from first.hand experierice of . traveling in Europe, �'and of_:
meeting:�.cus�tomers'�of our firm _that the new.:,trail system giYes Aspen
�� a �great advantage in the Colorado Ski market. " '
��The� new trail network sets Aspen and Snowmass apart from other
Colorado resorts. One of the things I have noticed throughout the .
years is the "aging' of our clientele. The cross country sking al- .
ternative gives these people a very viable option on their off
days. This will result in older people coming back to Aspen/Snowmass
even though they may have losL their zest for downhill sking. '
I have supported the council privately and will continue to do so,
but�wanted'���to.:encourage �you �.td support this very worthwhile winter
.� venture:�:`�I'=think it is one of the most 'important 'things we'�can
be supporting for our winter economy.. •,..-:;s;';..; � i
Respectively yours, . :
. �
i
. � �
�
Brent Waldron
BW/slh .
cc: Bill Stirling - Mayor of Aspen •
.;:�.
EXHIBIT �
- �r��: � �
`}'+'r'
►rr�,� r
>.
�. �
�
�
;
TM
ASPEN SKIING COMPANY
0060 ATLANTIC AVENUE � AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER •BOX 1246 � ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 • PHONE 303/925-1220
April 30, 1985
Mr. Craig Ward
Aspen Snowmass Nordic Council
P.O. Box 10815
Aspen, Colorado 81612
The Aspen Skiing Company is pleased to have the Aspen/Snowmass
Nordic Council develop and maintain its extensive cross country
trails system. That system will effectively connect the alpine
mountains and the resorts of Aspen and Snowmass.
The local and visitor response this past season, the Nordic Council's
first, was impressive. The Aspen Skiing Company has active representa-
tion on the Nordic Council Board of Directors, and we feel that the
Nordic Trails wi11 further enhance this winter resort.
Sincerely,
;
Jerry nn
President
JB/js
�
ASPEN MOUNTAIN • BUTTERMILK MOUNTAIN • SNOWMASS • BRECKENAIDGE �
. � �EvD 7� �• e5
. �
; ,
28th June 1985 -
- EXHIBIT
Board of County Oommissioners, Pitkin County �
506 East Main 3treet � L..�S�
Aspen, Oolorado 81611 .
Gentlemen:
I own property in the so called Proposed Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Recreation
District RE No. i . I want my property to be EXCLUDED from this special
district. I do NOT want to be paying tazes for it.
� Vex•y tr ly yours,
� .
rTatthew Oblock
P.O. �3ox 573 820 Durant Avenue
Aspen� Colorado 81612 �
[ fi�v �0 '�� 'g�
7/18Se �,Yf�/�'S/�5 � 'f'�i ru ��E �° 6
" EXHIBIT
� �
Box 156 p�!� �
llapen, Colorado �1612
June 26, 19iS5
I'itkin County Commissioners
586 �ast I:�ain
Aspen, Colorado t31611
Dear Sir: �
W.e are the sole owners of forty plus acres on Brush CreQk and the owners of
3/F3: interest of five hundred plus acre� on �a�t1e Creek. . All of the land
ia zoned A�,rrioulture and is in the Aspen School District.
W.e ai�e Petitionin� �to have our la,nd �Xc:Li1��D i'rom the proposed f�:ordio Rec—
reation Diotrict.
'Phe Agricultura zoned land is the f'ollowing:
Brush Creek� Lot 27 Soc 5-10—d5 and �ths sout[�orly por�tion of Lot 17.
Castlo Creek H � S 92, Hes 302, Stringer Placer by Metes and
Bounda in Sec. lii, 19-10—ti5. .
sr� i�4 N� i/4, sw1/4 tu�1/4. rr�� i/4 s�i/4. s ec. 23—lo—ts5
Idira•„o Pla.cer � 6y?4
�me Yl�cer � 7531
'i'hank Y ou, .
Sincerely, '
Robert ►'. Sinclair
C�I-�l�',.�,�,.�°<�c'v`'�Q.(�L/
�Czabeth L Sinclair
i
7'�'�
� �ru��w�+vt�.�N a�C
. - ,
_,:::;.-
_ , __- _ . _ _ . . ___ i
. . . . � . . . � exHierc ,
• . � � � � � .•NATHAN B. RHEIiVLANDER � � . � � � �
, ATTORNGY AT LAW
. ' ' 1206 SAN ANTONIO.T.IIIRU I�LOOR' , � ' , •
' AU5TIN,TLi?fAS�870I
. •. , � .• TL'LEI'llc '(512)472•. �8 '
January 16, 19P5
�'r. Craia, Tr'ard .
As en�Snowmass �?ordtc Council
c� Aspen Chamber of Commerce '
Aspen, Colora.�o
Dear Crai�:
The Austin American-Statesman carred a story this weekend on the
new cross-country trails beinp,� developed in•:your area� and I thought
I mieht drop a line to see if you could furnish us with a set of maps
or other information as mieht be helpful. Sorry to have to address
this throu�h the Chamber, if such a thin� is even permitted to exist,
but the paper showed no other a,ddress.
Several friends and I have been fairly avid ba.ckpackers over
the ,years� and cross-country is somethine of a new-found passion. We
would like to see about combininF the two sports ("This must be sport--
it hurts too much to be fun"�, so if possible please advise as to any
suitable overni�ht locations, huts or whatever. ?�Je axe looking at
makinp� a Sprin� trip either this year or next, so any words of advice ,
as to conditions then would also be very much appreciated.
D ny thanks�
.
Nathan B. heinlan er - �
r
Please 'dote--Change of Address:
R09 Rio Grande, Ste. 203 ;
Austin. Texas 7R7�1
512 * 472 9�?22
��
\, ��
,�
x`��,�'J .
��
_ . -__ .. ..... .. ' � •:_ _ . . . EXHIBIT j .
. . �... ... . . . : . . �--;, .. .. .�,: ., . . � � . .
. , , ., . • � • ' ''� %`ill�I) �✓.� ..J . . . `ti: . , •
• - . ' . . . � . . . .
. " ' �z ^ .
: . . � ��lr�f �/v.y,;!-/:�J��. _��...�`�.�y.. .:<< _. � • .
.. _. ' . I ' � ' `, � • )i. � I
.. . . ' ' • M j'GC,l,r-,. / C =t'-v��� `���� ��� �.-.; .;.... . � .
:
. ��J�- • �
, ✓ �
�--�.
. , _.f_.�/�..-/�:.� . . .
. .� � ,. , f
C`. ��,r:. . �✓� l/f-�i'S
�
'� ;
. �.:/�,:;�c,l j�-�••:�t�•i: .
,
T � .
. . . . . %'-i._ y.J,f, �!./ �'/.'�'i��
�
. '
" . � thE �iRSt national. Bank
;
. - P.O.BOX 61 PAULS VALIEY.OKLAHOMA 73075 l . �
' . . - 2� ���8�/ . ' � .
. i. '
� . ; . �
.� . �. . � � -r---- ! .
� �� ��
. , � � .
. . : . : . A.�....�- � �� i _ .
. . ; �. .. .
. � � . . : � � � � � � � � � � . �
. . . . � �
.� . � . a.P�- �� �'�-� -�`�'"� °~..� ' _ �.�
� . �.�- .�-� �° �` ; � . .
. � � �
- � . � � ,� �,, � �,-�- ; �� .
. �?�� . . .
. . � � '�' �' �`�- .
� � - . � � - . .
� �� �� . �..�..- . � .
,
� .
; . � . �. . . � � .
�
� � _ , �:��," ��p �,y! � � .
; .. .
� � �. . �� z N � 7�
. t°� �"'� , 0� 73D .
_
_ :-_ ._ _.... -
• ' � JOHN G. PENSON �
. 462$ INrErtF�pS7 Tw0 � ' '
� OALLAS,TElfAS 75270 . '
� • February 13, 1485 ' � •
r"'�j
I„j.'7 L•i' I'!1. Cr ; ...
-.: r-
J� �
r-.:?,i'� EXHIBR
� i
Dc.c o (�r ,5�
Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Council s,:;�����
Post Office Box 10815 .�_,_rl, i;o
Aspen, Colorado 81612 �
Gentlemen: �
I
Enclosed is a Sponsor contribution from .
Mrs. Penson and me to the Aspen/Snowmass Nordic
Council.
We wish to congratulate all of you on this .
fine program of a network of free, cross country
trails. It is one of the finest projects we have �
ever heard o� and we know it will be a great boost ' +
to the development of cross couiitry skiing and . � !
to the greatly increased pleasure derived from i
it by so many people, both young and old. �
In January we enjoyed the trails on the • �
� golf course, at the Aspen Club and along the Rio � �.
. Grande Trail, as well as those at Ashcroft. We �� .
� :..; � are Iooking forward to returning for some more :
cross country late in March.
• � Thanks again and please keep this wonder- -
• ful project going. -- •
�
rsincerely,. _- �' . �
� _ � - .. ,
. � � `; �_ . ;, . �'� -�- - - - �� �. �
. John G. Penson � '
�. .
� � JGP:ja .
� Enclosure �
l. ' �
�3`i: '.1 e .
..'�
Aspen EXHIBIT
M iddle � � �'
Schc�ol •�
Box 300 As pen ,Co lor o 612
June 24, 1985
Craig Ward
Executive Director .
Aspen Nordic Concil
Box 10815
Aspen, CO 81612
Dear Craig,
Enclosed please find a small token in appreciation for the
use of the Aspen Nordic Council trail system. Throughout
the winter, our 5th and 6th grade classes used the trail
system as part of our Outdoor Education Program. We are
looking forward to using them once again next year, and wish
you the best of iuck in your endeavors. ;
�
Sincerely yours,
l;�'•��+��C/ . �
�
Grtff N. Smith .
. �_�..•�-�J�.:�__ .-:a...�._.-'�-�r'�^r��r�t���r'�-..-r t:.1:-.._i.._L_. �L,J L,.r.'i ��_..' � ' :1'_�'�r��-��J L._. " _ _ . :t_ .C
=�... `. ...- `.:. . �•- ��� `•'�-` ` L�''��l��_.�-. '--.�L •l_ •� ••� c.•� , �, '- ..: -�� ..�� . -�i... �c. ::��ti���-- ua��i
��r<`i�=��c�i���;r4�:��o',r�',��'.�,r��;���ASP1N SCHCOL�DiSTRICT 1�0:��-`�r��r�;r�r.���-���-ti��,r� L . r'
L� c ic�Co� c�`a..� �m �r. lclim�ioi�ac IC:��PE��y�CASH•AL'COUNT���s_��c: - .�...���;`�(c�Lc��{�.t'c4tc - .��m . r� --_) .
r� r`'r-- 1
o`' :-.IC¢' r�r�IF.:`�az �c-�Lr:,�i t�i.v L_rLr.a �c �i...11ar��a--��fr � a-.- .�c-�LcJ c�r7ra-�{��-fLa`J�c tc-l�r�lr...j��i�::r-i:r•_'� :
' ��sc.fc�ri��i�.�.ri : � c a�im oe �rm s� l.�ir�ip.0.80X`.100��. .ic� �!ic. ��• � c c�'�•_ 0_ r . •
;�.. _..� �,����.�C._L L �!�::�_. ����--`ASPEN:.coiore,nooe�e�z:-.►. _L��?i=�L-•L�i���.��°N_._�. ;.389.7�� ..t
' -i'�' e.::.�:�`'�:c-;jc11- c �o s..�_ -iic�i`o.'Ir-I`—:• •� • �. !
�'-ri°° _, `, �� ��,�::�.. ��� �.__._ _ _ . . ..� ._ .�._ , -•ii� F��� .. •,;�- -
�:� C���c'ir�_,ra�+�rrir:�_(� Ic�`� r�lc=' . . "r1:rV��lcplr'11clI`-���c( u.l�ecl c� s_sl�� Ii.' '
' --�r�� r - ��. .._ �� ..��_,�y.- �.��- � � �,__..__. : .i,`
`-.�° .�.��i..`- ..9iWK OF ASPEN tJ '!°t.J 1`.J�c-. , _ - c '� - - —�f'c �c�i c,�L'_I[°,;��-�� ss-/as�1o21
c �`U._ i� �.` ., i• � ��_ . '!:r i__f_ �
` �`•'�r ..ASPEN.�COLORAdD ar::- r i L.°`'`�� _. . .. . �': ,_ "_ ' r. i i c�I�^�(��I a�I�- !i��'- • .
I i�.�^��6• �f_ .��' - . .� �,1 ^ . .,: : . � �..
v�i�'j��i` c..�� _ '" . l �;:;;. , t�U11B 24. . '.19$`� ' .�'.ti: ' _ •
^;ac�c-.� :rc�r �� .-� �r.-1 _i �roLr l�r_•t�. _ . . -�'. .c ; , .. -_i
.�• - . �
_ � �L�'�c�Lc^,jc '.�c:_�� 7�_..� _•r !fc�� �1 _ � .. . .. .. _ . . . '_ - �`I'a'� _ •�a•ilr`��I. _ . •
._PAY'c Tr►Pn "� ' '° ��jioo**;k`********#**�***�******�***********�r -�'�. �.r.'-:" 25.00 '`- • ..
' , .. _
_-: . ;�f . .. ...� '-r ' - .��... ..� - ''l �. - - - - . - - � __.. '
__ _ _ oo�.u►AS`s �
�ra_r�=.}�c ,_�_: c�`�..�cc ^��c �cl�_• :"1.`c ' c �i+'' c r '� : . .
c��'�tr - �r.�i��:::�a''� :r_� 1 c-�tr•ii�_�1 :r` �c-; _ _'' _' _ '.r' ' _ ' _ '��c .
�� �r `Aspen Nordic �Counci 1= . � - - ._-- • • - , , _ �y:- - -- - � ._
�OF - - - -- =,��rQ��i` ��;;;�•L - -,i� - _. _ ,-� `i;_- . . . . � `, - "'•- - - - -.
- . ``r` ��` - - - � - : _ = _._ � _ _ . .. ` _ _ .
. ._- - � . :. . _ . �•, ,
.. . . -. 23 40-110-400-09 - -.� . l�� . . . _ -
������'0000 389 7��• ��: i0 21046 5 5�: 9 200 78 9i�'
...w�...o•�w�rv
�I
�
Griff Smith, Principal Box 300, Aspen, Colorado 81612 Telephone: 303/925-6623
,
� , EXHIBIT .
, , • . �. • . � , � . � • � /�
' J05E. M. ACEBO'
� CERTIFIEO PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
' r. o. eox Q ' •
CARBONDALE: COLORADO 81623 � ' •
t303) D63-3d17
/� /'9a� 8s
tr'�-t,�/P�►M�.�,; .
(T�t2fc. �� �jiJ a�n�"ti+�» �'"o ya✓✓' a�u�i.7�'�.�g �.a. .Q . �/
/
�� ��.a.A � nJ�✓a.. Vj�C � //Lt� �/O�ri� //GH2�lL t0 ��t0.rw�l/�
li / ..�--
t/r1�✓�✓w vT�- 0 M�y G�t�t s• �jiv, �/'�ei ��i o y 0 v�j lj/� ,Firf�y t..e �/ ) '
/ � �
.�-f .�.:.F o,,r �r,u+4 r . I
1
. �
� S f'r y i.�✓ �tir✓rc �wY�!.r H f � .Y �•ws. �i��� 73 S''11`!�
f
f„w .� 6�r,��� y,� �,� w..� ��.� � ti o�, ;-f— , �
9 a�h g _ ,,�,�, N d r..i �-'� S 9 Q ✓!Q 5 Q . � �'�i�- o»�„ dGj cf c :
W �
' � �►ro u!✓r�• �lL►vQo✓� .WL��y(r 1� L"� /^" 7�te•,/rfLft /o✓✓•�j L.C'i1/Gr�
l�A�i���.f yo.ir �iinQ�y� � �'f'�i� 4�?iwj t�'C . wo..(1Q �c /,� /n�w�r'r i
� Y
Gs��r/�� "7fe o✓� �or✓Mu'I .
�✓✓ �v40 /S !/wy n, CG, — wi✓� A �,,,o✓k v� ���• .L yiCL :
P.n o y� �v�.��. 7�0 `�c .ti✓+i�iL(.c �✓ �'�L� � v f crS /� �ar'r�i a-..�.c.� .
�, z �,,,7"..6✓T;,� , � ..-1�. L-✓,,�--
�
�
C�s� .
. _ . --•----. . . . . . ._. . . •• -- - . . • � � � �
� � . . . . � : .. ---.. .. .... _...._ � .
.. � i. .. � �
. , , .
• .. . � .... . � 1 � �
. �; � . � � � �. � ,
. , -.�; . . �
� � , �` ,
. � ;. . .
� .. . � .. . . . -
� �, _
_ �� � � � � '
_ . . . �, � .
. . . � � �
. � C c � � � � .
� � � . � � � � ��
: • � �
: c � ^ � �
: . � � ..__ . .._ . .�. __ .__.._ . .
, -� _ _
. • . . ' ' ' � , .
. Metropolitan Nev�rYork Ski Council
• • A Non-Projlt Organlsatfon • • � ,
� New York,N.Y. . "/(� I?!NP/1�L��FJ ��'�`"�
� I'{��ip��Gr'GY�7� .
�, �y, �y�y
��' ��'�'� � -""' EXHIBIT �,
��� N�� �'��.�:�
� �
P��t���,Cv�� C�
�4a�, ec� 8'i G��
✓..e�t/! ��� — '
� '_ _ � �c.zu�� b�l.�Gzz� �- �G''`�.
y'�
C��c� �- � ido L��,y �u..C�, �t' ���- ?ila,y�"'�.
.�P-�o—I� 5�-� �� �'�-a,...� .�-t�,v� /n��/J, s�"'�'�`� /
� ����.�.�� �' �- d��` o���
�o _
� ���� ��� ����
�l.c.; ��-�-�'i ��� � �a� ! .
,��u�e a-��v-D�woz�"-J �,,.
� � � l.x.�a4 �Cz�"u,�-�.- � .
u,�.c.�,,��,,;r,c, ��c<..��a.o c���--j `�Ue�.�,,, o�- ��pa�'� ,
�
�� �.azu.d�. '�. �� ���/���a��.c�ee�/
,¢p o��e. ,a�.P-�`� �°�`'o ��"- , ��a� .. i
.
�, . - �.�,,,��piZy.E�-s�.�-�-�i /lKU-��.t"`� 1
. �
� o�vt�U�u�i14 � �
,,y�- �ivt�.L �ti ,y��v, ��li-��'u' rfa °��� J�°z`°'
w/% _ _�_ ��,iA.A (}yt� �L��
1T'4�(�j(�� iw�., /�
��i�.= ��� °� �����:� .�. �
5 ,v�
��,� ���� � I
�
. �zu� r
� � �� . - ;
� ��� ��
;
� � � . :,
-i�� s
i
' , " ' � . . . . . � " EXHIBIT
- . ' .. . .; • ' � , . . . , . . � .
11• . ....� . � '� .
hhovemDer 4, 1964
. �. . � Att'n. Barb Moebius
Dear 3arL• ,
Enclosed please find $50. in support of the Nordic Council. Sounds great!
Barb, might the Council consider setting up an organ.ized group or�clnb
for i�termediate skiers who would like to go out for_ only two to four
' hours--on a fairly regular basis?
� • � I would be interested in this and would assist.
' �• 1/.�. t��y��+
� Tee Beli
• � Box 1416
�. � . � Aspen
:� • � Ph. 925-3891
�
; . � • �
�• .:�; ,.
�-;;.:::��,T ,
'�, . ...�.
. .:e:.:i`�.a:t �
j � . 9l80Z Q!�oPrayla8
� . PDOa/uaa� o
y lV L00S
� • ly8iy��fauo,y
i n
//
- A
• . � .. � ' • � � . I
. : ... _.. : , . . • . • . ' . . . .. . EXHIBIT �
..'.. . . • . . , . , � . ., �
� . � � � . .. � • � • . .i
. . . • � � �
� r � . .
;
� o G� �
. � � �
. 2 �
0
.
. • m
o �`
N • . \
�-...:.�.
f��
�Y�.L lz ' �� �_ � _.
• • � /
� ��.
.. ^ /
. ��� � Y-Z��_
� `�"�`'t-L���. •
/�ZL L ` -<<. ..
. � -�'r.> 3'--- ����'� <<C���� �- „_ „ �cc C-. ��._-
�� .
. �t-l." �-C_< <� . -+t__ ...L�.�..
� : � C'e��-�.< <..-�� .,� � � .� l:c_ c,�,t :.-�c . � �� .
�� z� � � G f. � ,� �
�� � v , i
. ,
• � � �G�.CGG .
' � �/
. • 7 I
�GL4 ��C:�:z
� � �_.�,� �.� i
i
�
-. .
. � � '�'� � . ' . . ' . • . .j
� j�.. . � . .
."��.��.......+. ..�r,v�..�..� .�.e..�..�. __
' • . .;; .
. a� ��� � � � .. �. . . � , . . � .� . . . , � . . � �H�B� ;
� � �--..� . . . . .. . . �. . .
. w!-lI
� � S ';���'� i �,� j ,t: .� 5,��.-� � ' � �
.. � JSc� Yov" ��.�,��- ,$ YST'� /� T . . .. � :
: ;?�� /�5 P�"� c,c�v 3, ��f v-�'� S c..�c�C'��--� . ��, . ..� . .
�;
' �D �o n-� �.-a��- c��'2S��.,�° J � :•' �
� ' ''" ,,.J :'..��' � .
, y� v /=0 2 .�,•:�o v t 0�� .��� ' .� ti,,��'
;:�,��� SY:� T��-t--i � ,�- . � ���� ,
�
•� � -� 'I"�l :..v �.� o� ��, y� /-!`L,c_ �' Y�? J � -
, � �'�
.,
,_^ a Tr -J U � e
:��:��� � - � � . �
:��
. � � fi ��� .
' Y� �M% .
. .�'�' . M i. � ' .
:.�� 7P.�^''"-"',� G`,C`�' . � .. .
�� I- . .
i �• � ' .. . .
' Z r� ... ' � . '.. . .
1 �t
� til� ._ _ .� - .. . .
� .�� " � . ' .
' y: . . . ' , . .
, �x . , , . .
: ;� �"� , ' .. .. : � : . . . ., . . :
`� ���� � � � � . . -
; . . .
; . . . . . . .
; . . , . . . .. .. . . : . � . . . . . � � .
_;�;:�::,���: . . � .
� �tts:,i5%! . . � • � . � .
� - . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . '
i . .
1 ..
l
. . ... - ti:ti . ... � .
. ' .. _..�. . � . : . . . p� �==.� • ( `r�`� . .
� ' • . . '. . • . '. _ ' ' , . EXHIBIT
. , �', � l�, ,� � �,,:r�t%:. .c��J17�1 �• . , � 1j '
. . �.:.:.. �: • �/``-��` ��� � .
. . . . . � �,�,U)C, f U '' � ` � _ .
. _�'� , -��L �•: l
• ' � . . �v�,�=%�'1 � `_ " , (
. � �/ 7 J-,��.7.1 {
. ; ..` d i.:i��;��-�r1 � .
/.% �,. :-�--- ��L:J i ��� r �
� � ,, . , / - �'.,� ' -�!�-t � 1 f I �"—-�� . _ .
T=�
� . . � � ��-"t-� (�-. v 1� � '; . .
. . `~1 �• �f'cf S �,✓;J .
. J�i� O ���� � G � t -� . �.
1�, ��e %� �
�
�t.� �!� ��-�i✓� �-'� �
� ` � �^ � ,�cr � . .
� � �f�L v✓�r���l -� . .
. r r,%L�� ��.���. r.1;;�t.9lrj L-. (/��J'`":.`-- . .
. . • - !.J ♦ ,�:..�..• ; .. �
t �� /O / ,
. . . • y '' ` � J f� �� - i . . .
• �✓ l � � � !
. � � � • , . ' � � .
�
, � �. � r �r-,.�.i Z Ll��....=✓�---�J ! . ' ...
� � � G :.. , . .
� . . .. . . . �. � , , . ...
. � .� . � . � �, �'� � ��✓L�-t�'- � . �. .
. . . . . _ ;/,i''� . . . . . . .. -
. � -� . �. . t - � :
�� .- . .:�. : _ . � . ; � . . ��7/�� . � � .
. _. . ; . . . . . _.
� . . . � . ��-���. . - .
. . , . . ..
. - . � . � lv� � -�� .. : - � . .
. , .
� � � . � � . � � � �u r���.e �� -� � � : � � -
. -� � � � .
� . .� .� � � - :� : : , . ; �� � . �
� � :; � ° � � �
. . ; _ . .
, .
. � � :: �. � . . : � . ' ,� :. .
;� .. ; � . .
,.::- :;. . , � .
;-�:�_ ..:.�.;-: .
_.�. ..:.�. ;
J,�_ � .::.'Y� . .. • . , _ . � �
�+'�C�
• Q �Vu�
� • .
.
�
i
�. .
�
a.....�,4..0....�..�..�� �.... .., .
. . � ` . . _ . . . ,
. ,
� . • .
.%��C.�:�� ...�� �... •�-�`?`�-{_.` � L-C� "L�1- ,'L�'�L;��t�._�-�_�'.-� `� l . .
• . . . . / ��.
' G�--,,� ' �.,�- .� , �I?.�:��.��.- �. �-��.�.. �
� � ��
. •� � .�� � � -.'L�.�>.r` . -L, �..�.--,. "� ,
(�--�z L.cL• Z� _
._ �% �� �. Lt c�C� c- �� -; �-L� C��t -_;f��, ��t.�;�,
� �Z.� �:_.��. c% � �
� - .
r �
Cl_ ��<� ��c•'1.�._c- i� . '.�—�C� --I L /�..J_
�r � � t' l_._ ( c-� �, /t� C_. `• '
- �f .
'/� � `��1 . l_-� � � ���z� � ��-
� � ; " " � � ��.
� � _ c:.I� C. ��� �
��3 � � y
i
, _ .. _ __ ,_ ..
I �� . � � � � ' � . �.� �. �
EXHIBIT
I . . - . . . -: . - �-; �
. . . :*., �--
x an�§� its �1:
1n.: . . ,
. . .� � � � �
' For nore informatiott,contact As- � ,
��'' • -..petf Nordic C6uncI1,Boz 10625, As- ` I
i � . ;pen.Colo.81612,(303)925-4790. • _
�to�. .. ,. , , . . .
q� _Mongolian imeanderings - : ,
� .` •Here's�a touc tor the adveoturous 1
� hv 6ocseback and camel to t� �� •
m • j •
' • .•.tanrfs of Inner MonRe � I
� ••-'- • �.
! .
� .
:
i
; �.� � J�`�" Y �
, . � � ��
� (
i
�
� •
;
� �
.i
�
� . �
; �
;�' - .
.,
Management Office .
� 700 Paramus Park
�
Paramus, New Jersey 07652
'• 201/261-8000 ,
, . _ .. •.• � . � , . .. . .;: .
•� .. � .. _.. . , - • .. � . . , EXHlBIT
; .. ,. . � , � , . . • . .. • . . ' � �
.. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ,,. ..._. . . , 3 .
� : �. �_,.�,�;,,' �J,.�� �:.� I�.�.-� . �.���:���.'_e.d.�._
f�:
Gt �C , �.�Qe�,lw �u�-c%�t�.c.�c�.t. ,
: ; _;1 � • . � _ � . .
�
. _ 1(�_ .���(��� �1��.�(� �.� c=�-- �
. �� � �' �l <,u� a%���;, u �,r +
- . `.:�►Ltic,..:.:• G.�1c��l-L u.l c.�'L... , , �;
' � � ��,�L s s�ls�us.. av�f� -}�-w��s ---��,�- : �
I L � � •� �fLS�, bp - I'
( ,
� `` yll.t�., �� `�'�OIA�' lLt �u� 4 ' ..
' � ��� /%� n �f �I� �-
: —�1�re,�� (_.v� t�—o.� G_� J�,,�wu.�.��. .
! Qcli.. --Qr,,�-� ic� Il,c� u��.c�u..1 u�--` �ti.�. �cua�L sl _ �
�� .
� : ��� ���5 � . .
; �,� ��`.�'�-'"" i. ..
. . . . ; �<<�-,� �� 1 � .
; . . . . : It,,�,r� C' �---�.-��, �. � :
. ..; ��°`��" � .
� . . � D�q ( �r�C. G?�e�ua_.e___ I . .
� �� � � �or� �l. `�. rc�a1 .
� � . � � � , . . .
;. � . � .. � �; � � :
; : ' _ . • . ' . �� 1� --� 1 tGl�.. � . : .
► �
� ;
� . . . ; . � . � .
. . ;
. . . . ; - . . .
. . i .
, � � .� �
. . , . . . . . . _. . - . .. . . - .. . . . . . . . .. .
. ; .. . . , . � : :'.. � � , �. .� �. � . . . � �. .� � . . � . � � .. .. . .. . .
::::,.�� . . � .
;.1:�� '�:y1. � ' � � . �
�:�...�A,�• . . . , �
• -"'•. ir . - . � .
`,�7.� !t>:j�.. . � . , ' . � .
. . . . . EXHiBIT
. ;..: _... ., ' " • . . . • Sally Gicnn � ' ..
• • • ' ' . �• • . 504 West Hallam, Aspen, Colora�o 8161
. .�. ,. ..� , . ' � . � lII �s'--° do�.az�e-,J 'u �'�'�/ iz- -_�l� �-�f ,
- . ' . : �"`1.`,`"�ei�-c�e�.� °�f-- � �i�u�� a� �w� ��l�c�a� . � .
� (�) �q.2.�u� . �'� ��%.�' .�.._::- ua•��L (a�:x�
,
. �,�� `�l�u�2�.%c�.�t.� oJ?) �� �a.���- /��c�1LU�.�
. : /��Q� �Q.u:� C�.�.���.�� ir�.�% �:�tt��.c� l.d.�.:e����uJ
�
� �.. � � 6-�l -�i�<- .Q-r�..�ri����o vx.z'a� GZ-c�� ���c:u.,�a!
.. � . c ,
Q�'d.�2ice�.�. �iiz d��.tc?ixc�aJ CL�✓ r,� 'G, ' �•a�
�,.,�Cri.xir..c�/ Q xl.� u� �Q.�Lc�x� ✓'Q?�,u.:oC.. 2f �
d �� D G�
� �° � `� .
�u ��- �.:�. � �t .��. ����
.,Que,�� � �%c� � ! .
. . . . � � �
� . ,1���,•,/��.�r _
.� . . ���'�' $ ��S ;
I . i
� .� � . � . E•WM � _
,. � . , -
:: � - � . � � . �.�� � � .
�. � � � � �� � � ��5s_ �� �� � . .
. . . �� � . .
' � . : i�, C� ��� � -� -a5,_ � ; ...
� t'� � �� �, -� �(� , . .
. • ,�-c.Q�`-ck `�c°'t' I k �S'y�u� C�u'a` `"��JYU� "'`
�) (�_J
. � � � � ;�-�� � -��S,�-,� �cL�j � �s� � .
� �
� �,��„�„ ��c,.�u-a,-. F; (�tr C� �:w ��� w�n�.id�
� I
� . . .. .. �cu,;� �-C.c.0 v►.���. �u-� � • • .
, _ �, �, � ��W ,,c' �
. . � C�.��s� �� �'-� � i .
� � � � ��. J���cs�� ,
, . � . . �( u��/(1/�_y �/�� ����' � �� . . .
�'� '`� ' f1. �(/1 [ CS,t,�c�: CC'G zcC �u-�/►ls u,`'t__ .
. .i.\'•'.tA..•C.�.I h , �11�5� � y^�'����X. I+.\ ! � �
'•' 3-���4�� 'v ` � _ (� 1 � �. I } �� �
� . � �e �U�-Ll.'v�l�.�►�.�C• • �Iv �c_c+-j R-- c,_� 4- � ;
' 1�- J
' c l(�-�-�--�-
. . � . —�b s�u �•f1�k lu tt,._- E,v Z�. �.� lti
�- � ll
C:'c'�' S �-�� ����� C� c:1. -_��� ���ltit� ��-
_ � ,{
�` ��1,u��A�, c I���:�,. -`,� l a c v��,
-_•- ----- il ....1.� � r. � �' `l � �
___..
_._ .��W_
.�--,_.�., .
�..��..w�....�.--
.='e
, . . , .' '... . • .. - ' EXHi81T � � �
..:. .. . � , �. � . .. . • � ., � .
.. . .~• . . �'f� ��j I��� ,
� ,�J /V crio�L�-c.- �-�`--�
. �
�'� /D kt 5�
. .�. . /��, c� ��� ��
�-- ,�.. � ���,..�. ``
/� ��� � . � .
� -�,.-°,� . � : � .
� �
�'t-a,. � J �fGj�� � !
� ; . ' . •
. . +:''x:::,�r.c,':�/'�;r/:/Y�•,�-'_L./+•c /�'.:f.t�jQ� ! '
� .���V �LlL�J�A.".: I��rWG � r...'.., ' .
. ' ?3�,t1 17QTICt'tpOft.S� J�l.���_ , _ • • .
� : NVas�ur�ta�_�C,�• �'�: ` _ • : � �,
; . _ . .
, . .
� . ; . . - .
; . .
� . ��
;
. ; . •
I, . � . �.. .• •
, � �� .
� —
�
i .
a
i , .
s: :.; .-.:�� ..
:. ;�.
- .>, .. �
� ., '::: .. ...�.... . . .... , . • .
' . � •_� ; . . . . .. F�� . . � : . . . - •t; '
-• . •• • •� � .. S. ROBERT MANN . , ��. ' Daer� .
� .. • . � � � � . . • � EXH BIT
� , � _ . . ����'°-� ' �
� �. � _. : . � . � . . �.� '
. . � �� . :� . � . ,�. ��o�(� ; .
. � . . � : /
� . . � � - . �`�—� G�ozthc.� �
: . . • . � j�'1�,� � .
. . . ��
> `�'� ,
� � �
. ,
- . .. � �. , tLb�!#�� � ' y . i. �
���-r� �a�s ��O ,
; �� � � .
I � �;�-�',D '�'" �°°93 .
i . � � . ��e. �,�Q � .
�� �c y��h �
� �� Q�o ����� �
. . . . ���e�� -�� .
.. . . - . � .
. � .� .�. � � � �1 ' .
. . . -� . . �
�. . . -_ . � �. .:- ::.�._..--_--� =-=:- .... _- - --- . ..____. ..__._._ i . .
. . . _ , .
� � � �1rr,�� e•�`�" -
��
. . . � : : �1�0.S e sA� ,.."` '"`°`A '"�°"�"`° ,c� U��'"' . r I?[+..R ; .
. , . . � �k p��' s.,,tJi.ur� - .
Co�+^��� S��� �^� r� (�,n.,�t� � �1� �C C' .
- �r.��'"``I�'Q �-�'t �� r` n�� ,��a�+�:'� . . .
..�y) ��y
. � . f�`� u�r 1 1,L `7!i���Q`j/ .�J�'1 1 ue . .
• ��"^ � t �c"-�' '�" �t-� � . ,
f��� 'o� � �' �/
.� Cu�3�'`"wC �"e o,1c�4 1 ✓�`^� �rt+ C��•''N`�.k ��+'�� i
� ' . '��
. • . • . ` .. • t�U✓�`�'l'�1 S�1 1 , � �..i�� Cl rt� r-C- O � � .
- ' � �„ b,.� �'r,.w� � �`,(T,., i
. . . � �/N�� «-,-�(,�,�f � �� �,� �i r.a�» ' �
� • . V �j, t Gto-�CJ- '
..� � � � � .. . • . �. �:.r-, sk""1 .�t� ,�e�„�� _ ,�.,�e,:,r���u . i��- r"`.' ,,. .
. '` .. . �,`l.A-f' `"" M;�� ��;1 a.�.-� � �.,� �� ; —
., - . . . . - �-(�� �c: s.,��,�� �. wz�� . 31�
v„-��i.:�l� , .
��.w.�.��_.._
_....___.
. .. . -�� .
ti,.,,:,-.... . . •
� � �� - � � � EXHti � -
. . .. --. . ' . : .. � ..� ' �
. . , . . - . • . � .
� _ _ ; . : � � : : _ .. c � �
, . . �.. . .
. . . � .. • � . .. .. � a� i��� ; � �
/ r a � � �
C �
h �
••.' ` �T L�WCt • ' f�G
� � ` � �
r,G�=� `u- Q , �� x
r � ^,�
f�',, /��G,�,Y,��k,<r-c�,. s �
• y���✓"""' r.ZL �„ �
` ` . ` �'`' ��...
; .� �%v� %�� .� • ;y �`, � � �,
�� �/���%� : a
/
t�/� ` �� �� � ►!�, ^t tG
� '"'"' � o
. � ' � � � ��
H. �' '�` � �, s.
��'`w,�.' /�, `� � ^ � r
� G� �"`�' � i
�-� �2� �it�``�> , ,n � �•. '
.�l/YI/v�i��"`- � � ^ 1 h `
���- . . , , � � .
� r.,,, .
� ����. � �
, �l, �-- �
�,
� � .
��'�,� �t� � � � j �A��,F�
�� � � . �
� n/l�� � 7 � = t �
� � �
�� � y (��
� y y� �
�/� N�Yf�J/�" /�v�'. °', �=
. �
�t L vs'1 1[✓��o�� � l �,
. . l � �` � 3 � �
� � .
; �
�
� � ,
•{ w M
. - - ' _ � , . ',�/ •t.
' •• �
� .�4�•' ,•�� :'y�' . .. , � • �
-.- . . . - - . . i �.
. �
. l� t
., , _ .
, .
�,. ___. �. __
. � . .: . EX IBIT:. . � � � . . ���h ClL f / j S'�
� , / .
���_ � .
. • . .!/ Cc'� � ("�[t��� ._ . � . .
. 'J , .
. . .. �; .. . - ; 1��.� �� �ti --j4<< •��-�����.��-��� �y. �+��.�.� .
.. ... . . - �, � � .
. . � � . .. . : c���-�-��� C��:-��.f-�; ��t��-�c ��<< ��. ��.�� ,
�' /
� . � !�' `�t� ��%SS - [�.'-zc:{.�..L:z.�: /�..�Lt 'f;��.i c(,�s .
� , 1
�
, . . ��. � c� �.�J �.� c .;•,�, �l�i�-"I2e �� ��Ctu�'
� �) I
. . ,
; . ,-��
, �
�'SS �'�,ZLtt�.� ,',-=t:.'t i ►;�/ ;:�c.C;li.�L�
, �
,.
: ,��G.LL(12;C,Gi. �:� t�: CC� �� l.� l��_�.. �,Zf.l.t�
��
; � �C.�:L�- �C�.�. �:°G:� �- G�% ���.Z�.�ti`. �C���
. . . . ; .� `�
. . . � . � . . � -�-,���tL �:.s ��C�et,���t �-�.. Cc��ti �c� �°z
. � � �
� � � � � : ��.�c�G:.� ���� � ;�� C-�L.�� � �� . �, , ; �.��
� � . . , ��
. � . ���z �c4- C- �-Lu-�� 1�<<z�Z .����J� ..�. ���-2
. r 'i�� '' U�- ' ' L�,��^��C��Z•=� � '` '
. � 1 � '�`%l'Lt�C
� � . �. � . �. � � ;� �� ; � -� �����C�- ���-j
. . � � �
� � . � - � �� C�.<:.c.E.� � .�'�' �
. � .
. .
. . _ .__._. ._..___- _ Gz.�C'�.��;��,
.___-� ------ 1
---- _------- -
� -- ,
� � ���. �- r-��.
. : �l ����5�� s�n� ,�,� �. �. '1-�
.
� S!�% • ��'�tP'�'�� �7 i.� f�L� /1 J��'� crr� . � .� . . . . . .
V �
-. � -�-����� y�N , �� . : . . � �.
:. �; .,-, � �,-�e� � � � . . � _
.. . ��� ��
r C �, �
�/ ��,p/( iHS '
G l
�� , N, ,� � �y3v � .
��1 �<< � .
. . : a ,� � ,/� o � � , .
• ' r . f, � ' 5 ' ) , . -J a �y
. . ' U a i�: •� / � ! ' �. • �, ' � � � GAH�B�
n . • � . � ! � s :
• .. oZ �' . �� ' . • t_{ . 1 � .
� ' �N^ �" t :� � .' .' •�-' . ' . . '' � . , �
. .... < N T � � � � ��+
... . . . dog� �� .., :� r '� .i � '�%' r; I' �
<y��� � f � �^ ,:r� �v � ' � � �
- JZ - � �� � � q
�� - � .�� , �
K � J .' , .. , ,
C70 � .� � �
' W? < .� ? � .�. \l
�� � J 1 -` � �
. = � W � �; � .. �' , `-�
� <�N Z N j • .
j �WamN � l, � y� J �i �
� l: z
�, .
HZro •r � •� Z �
; � Q�N � � rJ J � � . a
j � 0 8� � ,J �-.. �) . •.'� m
� �= j � r _.� ,- N
,.� -.� ./ � `+ .j y
� � W � � � •�/ •�+'1� l] '1
Q f
. � � r --= �•o
o i < �`i , � J ..�i � --� i �
lJ
1 • • ,�.QB�TL. +�'gI
:, � . • � ��. � .{-�,�� ?/o t�
� ' • . .. . � � � )�., � � y�sL ��- � �-�jce��
, V °� �
; �� � �� �-�, t ��S
. � : --E-�,�,,�.... �
. . . ' � �i ,� �,...� � � 6`}N C_
. , t � � ��i �� �
� � . �. : . � . . , : .- �: � � �. ,�,� +Q�..�., .�,,,.�
� � �. : � - � '�--� • ��- �a r"`.�^��
� � � . �� : .�--o �,.a - � ,,1.,;.,,�.
. lyq SEt�i c.Ho Tp�.
. � . - . . � �E��Q � .�E��..
� � �. _ � 0 LO ��Si 6�Ry N y 1156$ ,
. - .: , �t � � 51�� �
- . . � 1����y .
. . � ..� . � . ,_ , . .. : � �E S�
. .. . . . � . : ���
� ixnos A4ura Magaz�nes.Inc..380 Madison Avciwc.New Yark C�ly�0017•TclepAono 12121687•3000
� ����... .� m..a. 7� _ _ _ __
r:
;�
�� � ' EXHIBR �
�i �F eb�v.a�-..� 1��tg�S � �
�
!
; .
I 1 y ��,���vn� �«�e.� � .
iV.)�es�' Gcc�c�•��'� �4390 '
�
i
� 5(��On Nc�c�c3��c. �u�c:i`
;'t�c;� 1:�%t5
;
�/�`S�'�c`, (�.yl�.�-�.d`� 81 b �-Z
. . � .
; �
�
J.�.�- Strs � �
�
4'le� �.� K.�. ,tif���;u.� �b�.�t -1Mo., u-oss .
i �
� .
� �-�0�+'n� �� �� . �
`I'�"��y
�
�� �,�.-� .
' : jZ I��HFF/ZD �.�a�� . - -
zcz �-lov,�a� !-���. -
�OcN�+.LC� ��PK�!'�:• T. 0�7�L- Z ' .
� �f.Ja,� f�J f��T/�' //1/ 7'J�E toc�4C /�Jf��f� �fkl
. , . A��/ E� � . �'
f�.Sf' �kr� �7 . /�/� � �til v�'y i,vr��sr�t�
� �� ��
/r►� yaiNy -f1���. ,� w�v/ L��e � irF�Rrt�riv,v ,v���r"
. FSPEN Sk//f�(� I /g�l��v r�Ai/�Y✓S ��s����� r'7ir����tl /�ti��
_ /���C�S d�' �'/'� !//Oc�S� ,LF �'GSS��'c.� :,
`�f��'/✓� �� C� ,
. . . . .. . .:; .
� �' • '. . . • . • � � � '�LI,C j. •
. . . � . . ' � � . • • ' � EXHIBIT � : .
� .. . .:. � � . � . :�. :� �. .� �� .. 1.� . . . . . .. . . .
�,.�A �'.cL��i� ,
, . . , ,, . ;. � �/
" : ... ' . .. � ��1 LU t,.C.LC(�J `LCY L L ��17'i.f • ' .
ii•, ... � ' . . ' . 1 •. ' r�rL'.l._L� �• G'�t'.t=` � C..l('_; /C..���.�_�� l .�1 — �— . . ' .
,' ' , , r � ` , � � ( -
J ' • CLt..t C. �.L-C 1 �-l �L.i 1 LL� /��LL C�C��( ���•li7i��( �.
� � �
� '+ T�-�.��7�.� �f c � l` � .�t`���<< �:� � ��� � I � .
; �- � � � ^ .
� - r'-`Z C'�S � [�;Ll.0�� 'Zc:• ��'ll:..�.(� , `� rl�LZ•7 •'F]�["'_�C.���i1��
� � . t l u i'i
f �, {�
J� ;� ;c� Lr/�� �`7•� `� �G ��2-C� � C�v�c.7�� . .
. �, ,.� � �
' --�-- �IC� C /��=C ?�C.c.(.. � � � ►
; � j y � t (�%L� �7 s c a-k�� -- �
� •� :ti,�. — �> ,, .; i
i ����-� { C �/.��:.t-�.� _LL� � � r.� ' %'SS��a�� i
i ` '-� � , •��
. . ; : . �E'.c�:.,�' ; �- �"1�.� C ��- �'�r�..(%�.:�.c. �-L�� l2� !
. � �� �. J ; .
.
� � ' 'r��'c��«� c��'n- , �� �.c � � � .
� . C.�.l�.� � l C�Z � `z u � c� � . -
� r�c' L�� ' ` `7LC.�'z ��7t1:. CZ.G�.c. �C�'�'LL .� .
. . . L � � "�,!I � ��� � � .
: � ����c.�`z�� �"h�. .��ic�� �`�-� �'s /l c h!r �-c-� • � .
� . �. .. � 1 �'c..E.t� `�c �. �� 1�-n'�l .
. ' • •.'. ' , . u� l� ) , /] .' .
� ,
� � . •, . • . CI• � if J/ `�� 't n �L�+ l�(rl�('?Z; W�V+�-- � ��/1 .
, , t L��.LJ"y �,('- �
� �� r r
. i :
� . � , . � � e.���-���. ���� ��,� � � . . . .
. . . ,��� � � : .
. � ��;Lj� `-�, � �l/J7�L � ��''�� �� . .
. G' I
� � ,��,�. i1 ,���%:'�17c1� �L'�c. �3 'c.��-, �2�n2� ; . .
� - � . . : � � C��� � t��.�. �Z��r�.�������--, _ � . .
. .. . � � .
' . . . . � ,,�l��.I�� -C'L�c�-Gc?`t�:� `l�% �`�.��u-�� .
... . � .� . / �
.. .. . .. .
--�•. . . 1`u�7CL ��G'7[ __ ^� . . �
,
' - . , ► . .
� S ��`_;� `"4
� . � . . � Le.i.. .� c-
/�� � � � , , _ . .
� �' 'a �- � ��'6��
�r Lc_L�t:..._� ��-.
. . . y�'` y ' -
.. . _.. . '. . '�'►y �\� . , � December 31► 19Bk' .
. . �. 1 , RD 6, Box 345
. . � , , • • . . • Flemington, New Jersey
. • '• � � ' . ' ' � 0$822 •
- • .:: � Customer Service � • � EXH BIT . �`
- , • . • `�spen Nordic Council ' , �
P. 0. Box�10815 " �
, , Aspen, Colorado "
� 81612 • . .
� Dear Sirs: .
� Please advise me on the availabit� of a cross' country
' track maker (such as mo�mted on the rear of a snowmobile to
• pack and create a cross-country ski track. This device was
� used on a track we enjoyed several years ago in Park City,
;
, Utah, and to our wnderstanding was used to create some of
4 the excellant tracks we enjoyed recently in Aspen.
s !
�
�
; . We would greatly appreciate your aid in this search.
E . . :
�; A self addressed card is enclosed. Thank you.
.. �
�
Sincerely, �
�
. " I ` �
� /
�
� � �i ' R' � yr' �{ r.' . . . ' . i� �'�_ � . . � . . .. . , .
. � . �� . � � . �-l.- ��. �•!�'`�� >t. , . � . �� ! . F �'� l . . . ' . - . , .
'��. .. .. _ . . .�. � . - i , � '+ . . .
. , .,. �,:• � � �, ., + •�-_ . . ,
' ...� � .� 1 :i - ` ,v1 � i . .
i 3 :.� �j � � ..1 �'.�
• ;� _r• l. ,f. � �- � '_ i . ] .} 1 '1 ,9 . . ' , �. � •
. . � , -
. ' �: ir.. �
: � �
, . , . d � , . � �
. . ; �, � �. �, .
, f- . \� \' � ' �\� .
. C� �� � °� �` �
� : �? � � r ,
� ; � . � � � .
. � � M .
.
. .�. �� �
, . � , �. M
. , M � - : � � .
'�� �� �. S� ` � �
� `y � �
�� c
� ��� � � � �, �, ,� �' � �
° '' � � � `� � � � ���� �' ��
. ---_ .. �
• ' ' . ' • . .C�. � � ' � . . EXHIBIT
� . � .� ��.. . � .5. � 1 ��, �. . /
• . . "' �; . c � . . . � � !�
. � � ° . F � �
� _ . • r ' �. � f ,
� F f , . ,� � G �� � 3
� � � � .
-{- -.�' . -1 N
__ � �
� � G P s- a .� � �
J -� �
" j�: �� �
r _.-
c
.r � I A r t ? �,...: � �
` , r � 1 .^^'-. �
� �
S � � _ ° �
� r � � : � � � .
`� � � o
� � � T � ° z
-` � r o
� � � � � n.
� � � °
� � �
C ` �, -� - rt °
� � �
� � r "� � o � � �
� � A � r
-. -�- p
� a � 3 ' r� p t
r � �
�fi � �
� � o � � � �
� f � c j . A �'r
. . ... --- - . __ _. _ ._ ...t_ --- -- �-----------�.__:_. _ .. . . . _
( . .
� ;.
: i—�n��Q, __._.�...----cG✓�. -� --�- . ..
. ! , r.-7 L_ / i .
. �c:2Q �
; '�.�� �Q � .
� . . . . : � �`� ri � . . � .
� . . ` ,tN.�c.0 - ,�,f ��,a cQc . � . � .
. s�� .� � .
; � .: � . " � � ��e '�`'� ,�cy ��-y•
�
. � . . . .� : . . . ����'�1� . . � . .
_ . -.. -i �a41 ��� . _
_ . - , . t`�C�� .
__�_
_
. .. ,.�.._..._...«.«,..�...w. �Yi Y-
; � ,
� � �. �. � � . � ' : � HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS � . � • � � � , �
• � 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-23 '
� � � � . . . EX IBIT �
. , ' ' �
C�� . ----
, �
�
��,� � ����� � �
. �� �� �
0���S �
G�'� �,�--,,, .
�l� ��� ,
_ Gv � �� ,I� ��d �
; � �°
%�`�`S ��� � w� C��
• �� �'k���-�- . /
��'�,,,� °'��'� -w����ri
� �� cv��� �
� �� �
�� �'' � .
�� �� f��
� �
�� �,C^' C�v`.�
�� , y . ��� � �e� y�-' °k" °�
� �
��� � �
�
��1 �
�
J
r/
,- __ _.. _ , .
� . .. . . .. .. ... . . -
- .. ��
. . � " ' . " ,: ' • - . , � . , , EXHIBIT
.. . , • // . ,.. Ci � . � �
� ' v!lll,l�}r�i re :' `� ._% c:..:'r•., .
' � . , • .�.���J� Cil r•r e�•r..l.:i.ai. I.!i. , `/
. .. ir� { - /.' � • .. � J .
.. �uJ..�i+F�i•r.. ./.�i! :'G��':.f.
: , -�,.� ' , � �.�.�-- �
� � �
. . �� �� �°�-- � . .
� � � � � � ��
��
.
� � � r
� �
,,, �; ; _ � � .
��� �
� �►...� . s�
� �-�.�a �-�°-� `'�'~ °'''"' ''J`�.
;� c.�.��- �-�- �-'�-R�"�
���:� � � •
; �,,¢- c�'`
� e.,•�,,, _ ��--`-� • , . �
! w� sk � -�"� .
�
�►- Q- �-� � , .
E�
� �-�- '- �, �.�
. ,� ��-� � . ; .
� w � � .
, . - i
, �� /„�� r �u �- ��;, w-
; A , � �r.��.�.r` '� ( .
. v�`� Q C!� � .
; l � — �
'� ��l\.6�W`Y'i"�/` J . @/11` � � �
• � .�..�9.,�.� �� �' � `' .
� �„ �:�.�. � � �',`-�1.
� ,� ',"C`r
o-ti � �, �; : .
`Q . �
s�� �f�^t- a`�" ���- ��-- �f
! ' � ��� - ��
��, � �e
� • c� ` "
-� Q a�..� �
.. �' / � -�
�;� �.,� �
E,
r.
M
.I ,
i
_ . �..
.
- . ..---��---
, � . . . . ... t2� : . . ; �
.. . �..,� • . - � , c.� � V:.�.o:�,e�,� ��� a�-� �-� � . � .
_ ..•. .: . . . . ��� �„ ..�,�:c�- �-'° � '
. .�� ,� �, . . .
. '� � � . � .
�- � .�- C'�.� �.r-°�-Q- , .,��- ,
� �- (t
�-G.�lt.: �,M. v ;�''�'� 1 �'--0�
�
) � • . �
l�` � �
,� ' �.
� � ��
�,.�� � � � � " ��
c.aw-a- , °^ � ��; :
�� o-� � . .
� � � � p ,
�,��,-,.-ww ��� ��0� ' �
� --,�¢ ��,`�
, 1 , � �-�- , .
, o ,,.� ��,�, -�°� �
�
� � � � � � i
i: � ,,r, .,.�,- Q- '�-, '"_' " . - .
,: � � � . .
� � W�' '. .
• . ' V�►- Ct� °` • .
'
,_ . _. ;_ _ .,. _ , • ��cQ„_, -'�-� d� ''v`.r�'°� i
�,,,►
� ��(ti � .
� � _ .
� S�� .
� , , :
. . � .
C_
e� �� � ..
� ���
��- � � � �'�p "
�:, �.S ,. � -��s? �
;'. -:;�' � , �. �.,,� _ �..u.�.�• �• -;cl.,.._- .
;° - ' � c�c� � °"`' � ' .
:i - . �- �. 4,�, Q,.�.�._ �� z_ .
;, � ,�� , � �,�,,,,x ' �� �� . .
,� � � �
._.__ ____ �iiiM"IIWYYiI ... . ....._. �
I . . �
-..,.; . ,
MEMORANDUM � : :c EXHIBIT
s::�:;;�� � r�
r:.�t. I
� �
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Gary Esary, Assistant County Attorne�_
DATE: May 24, 1985/ 8 July, 1985
— �=
RE: Unicorn Balloon Requests
As you can see from Dick Arnold's memo of April 29, 1985 (copy
attached) , Unicorn Balloon Company has made a request to expand
its commercial operations at the Airport.
The request will come to you in two parts, as followe:
(1) The attached Resolution, to be approved upon first reading
and set for public hearing as an amendment to the Airport
Regulations: and
(2) An amendment to the Use and Lease Agreement (for a T-hangar)
between the County and Unicorn to deal with the expansion of
commeccfal operations (propane tank, etc. ] .
The amendment to the curfew is being presented first because of
its threshold nature and the long public notice period necessary
for an amendment to the Airport Regulations. Unicorn has been
launching balloons at 6 : 00 a.m. , with Dick's permission on an
experimental basis, since mid-April. He will be present at the
meeting to report to you on any complaints or problems or any
conditions that might be placed on this curfew amendment (non-
interference with commercial operations, etc. ) .
If you approve of the concept of the 6:00 a.m. balloon launches
and pass the attached Resolution on first reading, We will be
back for public hearing on July 8 with any amendments ta the
Resolution that you suggest and with an amended Use and Lease
Agreement for review.
GSE:cd
Attachments
cc: Dick Arnold, Airport Manager
�
�
�
� --
.
sardy field
pitkin county airport
20292 hwy.82
aspen,colorado 816'11
303/925-6698
EXHIBIT
TO: Board of County Commissioners �=�-� 5�-•. � � r�}
r. J
� -�_i. I:r. �
FROM: Richard Arnold
DATE: 29 April 1985
RE: UNICORN BALLOON REQUEST
Enclosed in the packet provided, please find a reguest
by the Unicorn Balloon Company to operate from the
airport prior to 0700 hours.
Unicorn presently launch their balloons from a private
residence in the Buttermilk West sub division between
0600 and 0700 hours.
I recommend that Unicorn be allowed to operate their
commercial oueration:
1. From their existing T hanqar number 4
2. Launch the balloons from the taxiway only
3. Launch no earlier than 0600 hours
4. Install and operate a buried propane system
at our location to be approved.
;
i
i
...�..���,,.�� _ _ _ �..�.
EXHIBIT
ME610RANDUri � �
T0: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Tom Smith, County Attorney�
DATE: July 3, 1985
� RE: Tailwinds' Request for Retail Fuel Sales Operations
Zn conjunction with the request by Tailwinds, Ltd., to conduct
retail fuel sales at the Pitkin County Airport in competition
with the existing FBO, several legal issues have been raised by
Tailwinds, to the effect that the County cannot deny the request.
it is my view that there is no legal requirement to compel the
County to approve the Tailwinds' request. Accordingly, your
decision should be based upon the resolution of policy issues and
practical problems associated with the request, after considera-
• tion of the positions stated by Tailwinds, the Airport Manager,
Aspen Base Operations, and any other interested parties. while I
am not prepared to say that denial of the request is legally
required, i have not heard from ABO on this issue, and may need
to address it at the hearing. With respect to the legal issues
that have been raised please be advised as follows:
1. Federai Anti-Trust. With respect to the issue of liability
under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections
1 and 2, please be advised that the U.S. District Court for
the District of Colorado and the Tenth Circuit Court of
Appeals have determined that in the operation of local air-
ports, local governments in Colorado are immune from federal
anti-trust laws.
2. State Anti-Trust. with respect to the potential for liability
under state anti-trust law, C.P..S. 6-4-101, there is some
authority for the proposition that the County is protected by
the doctrine of governmental immunity from such anti-trust
liability. In addition, if you accept the recommendations of
the Airport Manager regarding this request, I do not believe
that the County's exposure to liability under this theory is
significant.
3. Federal Aviation Act. Section 308(al. Section 308(a) of the
Federal Aviation Act states as follows:
"There shall be no exclusive right for the
use of any landing area or air navigation
facility upon which federal funds have been
expended. For purposes of the preceding
sentence, the providing of services at an
airport by a single fixed-based operator
shall not be construed as an exclusive right
if it would be unreasonably costly, burden-
some, or impractical for more than one fixed-
based operator to provide such services, and
if allowing more than one fixed-based operator
to provide such services would require the
reduction of space leased pursuant to an
existing agreement between such single fixed-
based operator and such airport."
Again, if you accept the recommendations of the Airport Manager,
i do not believe that the County is vulnerable to liability under
this provision. First, the courts have held that this Section
1
provides no private cause of action, but may be enforced solely
by the FAA through its grant procedures. Second, the cases
establish that the prohibited monopoly applies to the landing
area and air navigation facilities, and not to other lands or
improvements, such as hangars or ramps. Third, it would appear
that if the Airport Manager is correct, it would be unreasonably
costly, burdensome, or impractical for more than one retail fuel
sale operation to exist at the Airport at this time. Finally, it
would appear that the approval of retail fuel sales operations by
Tailwinds would require the reduction of space leased to ABO
pursuant to its existing sgreement wzth the County. This limita-
tion further protects the County with respect to the statutory
requirements.
For all the reasons stated above, I do not believe that the legal
arguments previously advanced by Tailwinds, to the effect that
the County must approve its request, are supportable. While the
terms of the Conaty's agreement with ABO may not prohibit the
County from approving the Tailwinds' request, there are signifi-
cant problems associated with granting this request, as indicated
by the AirQort Manager. Your decision should be based upon the
resolution of these issues, as well as upon consideration of
other factors which may be brought forth by the public and the
affected entities.
TFS:cd
cc: John Eldert, County Manager
Richard Arnold, Airport Manager
Leonacd M. Oates, Esq.
Michael S, rtcCarthy, Esq.
2
I���/ / '
LTD.
20078 H,WY.82 • SARRY FIEI.D • ASPEN,COLORAQO 81611 (303)925-7510
� . � EXHIBtT
�. � � !
. , , . December 28�, �1�984 - . .
Mr. Richard .Arnold ' . . � � .
Airport Manager . � •
Sardy F'ield
. Aspen, CO 816I1
Dear Dick: ' �
As you requested, we hereby restate our pending proposal to
lease. fuel storage areas and� engage in retail fuel sales at� Sardy
Field. By this reiteration' of. our request we do not waive any
rights� accruing by reason of our earTier corre"spondence, conver-
sations, and submissions, (including 'the bid proposal and special
review application) with� respect to. these activities.. The
following is a description. of. our pending proposal: Your timeTy -
cansideration of the same is requested. As you know, this is the �
most commercially active period at Sardy Field and continued
delay in responding to our proposal. is costly, to say the least. �
Aspen Charter Service, a Colorado corporation, proposes to
engage in the unrestricted retail sale of Phillips Petroleum �Tet
A and 100 octane low lead aviation �gas�. To do so we will:
1. • Install, at our cost, two fuel storage � tanks �(10,000
gallon capacity each) in the� area adjace�t to the
�. � existing fuel storage tanks earlier designated by you
• as space �#1 (20'x70' ) . .
2. Have at least one truck for Jet A and one truck .for
avgas. �� �
3. Adopt an operatians manual: covering a].1 operations.
4. Require refueling personnel to have at least two years
� � . of experience or complete trai.ning specified in the
operations manual. '
5. Establish fuel prices based on. cost of qoods sold, �
. transportation costs, insurance and inventory� costs, as
well as all applicable taxes and �a reasonable rate of
return on investment. �
. . . !
� � I
COMPLETE FLYING SERVICES . INS7RUCTION . CHARTERS . SCENIC FLIGHTS
i
. . ,
Mr. Richard Arnold
December 28, 1984 �
Page ?, �
6. � Provifle the� ser.vice out of the existinq Tailwinds
� � . terminal �and have, minimum hours of operati�n between
0630 to one hour after sunset , daily (including holi-
. da5rs) . � All areas and servicES (e.g. . lounge area, .
� flight room, courtesj� �►eh,icle) available. t� Tailwinds'
customers will he equally available�to those of ACS:
7. Compl}�, in all transport, st�r.age and fueling activ-
. iti.es, with FAA regulation� and requirements, and
� reasonable liability i.nsurance requireme.nts that may be
imposed hy Pitkir. County.
8. In the event Pitkin County should desire that�we do so, �
�vP will protTide aircraft maintenance services (smallPr .
ai.rcraft in the Tai.lwinds hangar; lar.ger� aircraft
maintain�d by our r.lechanics in fzcilities at other ,
airpor�ts until adequate faci].ities a.re available at .
Sard}• Field) .�
We propose a five-year lease of• the fuel storage area with rPnt�l �
nf Twelve Hundred ($1200�.00) dollars �per year payable in equal
r.;onthly installments. .T.n additi�n, we will pay any fuel flowage
f.ees assessed by Pitkin County c+n all fuel distributors at Sardy
� Field. •
With ze�pect to disposition o� the fuel tanks we propose that:
1. In the event ACS should continue its operations
(elsewhere at thP airp�rt). at or prior to the end of
the. lease term, it be given. the opportunit1� to continue
� to uae the tanks., during �their, entirP useful life,
under similar lease terms. �
2. In the event ACS should terminate its operat?ons at � '
Sardy Fi:eld or ctherwise� determine to discontinue us�
of the fuel tanks, pr.ior to or .at the end of. the lease
term, ACS may: �
. (a) assign to another �perator its right t� the use oF �
the t.anks for the balance of the lease term;
(b? r_emove the tar_ks at its own expense;
. (c) . sell the lease of the fuel storaqe area and the
. . tanks in place,. provided that in the event of
• sale, there is granted to Pitkiri County a ri.oht of
�first refusal; or� �
(d) tak� � any other action mutuallS� agreeable to ACS �
�nd the County. �
___�
,��
Mr. Richa.rc� P.rnold�� .
December ?A, 1984 � � � �
� Page 3
The balaric� o£ the •l�ase terms would be those 'customarily i.mposed
�n tenants , at� the airport. We solicit comments about additional
service.s, concessions, consider�tion, ete. you �hink appropriate. . .
Very tr.uly your.s, ' �
ASPk�iv CHARTER SERVICE � � �
gy; � . ,.�.,` . . . .. ;4. �� ,.. • , .
Dan ticCarty •
klm . �
cc: Tom Smith�, Esq. . . •
J�hn Elde'rt ' . . �
Michael Kinsley, Chairman . � � � � � �
l3oar.d of County Commi�sione.rs • • - , � • � .
' . � , 1:.:�._.J l.: l�:i. ��.....� l��.i
• r:-�.;�
rr�r;ir;�co. .
T0: Tom Blake . _. EX IB11' �
FROM: Richard Arnold , . . _ , � •
. _ /
DATE: 3 Juiy 85 � ' " . ,
RE: TAILWIND'S I,TD. ' • �
Tailwind's I.td.hasrequested the right to sell .aviation petroleum
products at the airport and I recommend that the request be denied
for the following reasons:
1 . The special feview application. for fuel storage at the
airport should be granted, and accordingly Tailwind's
should be given permission for fuel storage sufficient
for ; their self-fueling needs.. � That application did not
include �a request for approval Qf retail fueT sales or
the 2and use .approved necessary for �such an operat'ion.
2. � In 1984 upon expiration� of the contract for the fixed
base operator at the Airport� the County requested � ' �
proposals for •a new FBO, .and awerded a contraci. after a ,
compet•itive process complying. with the Pitki�n County
Procurement Co.de. This process �incorporated the right �
to sell fuel at retail at the Airport. Tailwinds part-
• icipated unsuccessfully in this process. ILt would be
unfair for the County to permit retail fuel sales in
contraventian of. the established process on which Tailwinds
and others relied.
3. ' Al.l ramp� area that would be appropriate f.or the retai 1
refuel•ing• of aircraft is presently leased, t'o Aspen Base •
Oper�tion. (ABO) and unavailable to others exce�t: thraugh '
sub-lease. wi•th ABO. . • •
� . Kamp areas that are not leased. to ABO are� intended for � ' •
pub.li'c access for. the .taxi • and towing movement of sircra:ft �
only and could not be sefely used as a st.aging .area or
• re-fueling area. ABO has ind•icated that they would not •
permit their leased ramp area' to be used. by Tailwinds for .
retail fueliing operat�ions. �
,5. Iti would be inappropriate to �approve the Tailwinds request
' at� this time as the approva2 wbuld have to be eztended to.
a�l charter operators requesting the same 'right, and as
stated above the land does not exist for this act'ivity at
' - 1 - ' • .
� • � ' .
. ll�is timc�.
6. ` 'l'�iilwinds existing lease does not allow reteil sales and
;. we are not compelled ulnder the lease to allow expansion
• i nl.ci t.hat. �ref�. '
7 . 1 f the �mas•ter planning eff'ort ci�rrentl�y underwr�y indicates •
a secon•d FBO operation is rieeded at the Aspen Aicport , '. .
tt�ere wi 1] . bc: a competition . for •this ri�ht and• Tai lwinds
will 1» wetcome to compete.� � If a.pproved .specifi,c;ations
�+ I low rr.t.f�i .l fiie] s�lc,s by 't►Lher consessi.�neirs, Tailwinde. .' •
m�y :apply again after thaL Eime. . �
f.i, Mi�iimum requirements are presently being d•r�fted• f�r BOCC •
:�ppr`oval thal: will address all' concessions and leases oii
t.he Airport.. These rcyuirements will esteblish t}ie minimum
standards that will be expected from all operators ii�cluding
1<irid required, sefety� hours of operation� �pproved activit.ies ,
• min.iinum �fumber of employees, insucance� etc. llntil these
st�ndards are t�pprovc:d it would be ipappropriate Lc� permit
new commercial activities at the Airport. . •
y. . Any "expansion of the' Tailwinds charter business �into the
retail sales area�, or other expansion, will require comp'liance
with the land use code �and will have• to go through the sgecial
re,view process. - �
tO. T h�vc: included � copy of the Pea't, Marwick, Mitchel and '
Compony report.'. The report re.commends that Tailwinds be
�Jlowecl to enqage in self fueling operations as per the
• Federal. Aviation Ar.t . � • �
I �im uncert,t�.in as ta the weight that the BOCC may wish to .
assign to the report. ':
Ot:her infc,rm�tion as presented above, may be necessary to �.
evalu�te .the issue of� the seco,nd FBO and ,selling of the
retai ] av:iation fue.l. . ' ,
F'leF�se ser a leg�►1 memo from Tom Smith concern.i.ng this issue.
� . .
;
j . • .
� . . .
i . ' � , • .
i • . • ' ' •
_ '2� _ •
� �`ERTIFIED MAIL. - FETURt'1 FECEIPT •REQUESTED
� pitkin�� county �
� � � • S06 east main street
� '� aspen, colorado 61�11
� EXHiBR
�TUne I9, .1985 � . � �
. . � �
�4r. Can �fcCarty - •
Tailwinds, Ltd. �
Sardy Field .
20078 West Highway: 82 ' �
Aspen, Colorado 816Ii � . .
FE: Notice of Violation of Pitkin .County Code, Title IV, �
Airport Regulations�; �
r�otice of violation of Lease Agreement ' . �
Dear Mr. McCarty: � .
By letter of Februar.y 19, . 1385 , a copy of whicfi is attached, you
rrere notified by Richar� R. Arnold•, Airgort Manager, and Thoma� ,
Fenton Smith,. County Attorney, of violations of Pitkin County
Airport Regulations .and your Lease Agreement with Pitkin County,
based upon the illegal retail sale of fuel to aircraft at the
�Pitkin County Airport. . � � .
The County has addi•tional infocmation which indicates that Tail-
winds, .Ltd. , contin:ues to sell fuel at retail. to the .Fublic in �
violation of both the .re_gulations and the Agreement. This letter
constitutes a , notice of such violatfons, with a demand that snch
fuel sales cease, : thatyouv comply :with the Pi.tkin- County Code,
and that ybu corrply , with the Lease Agceement, or the Cou�ty may
take legal action to enforce the regulations� arid th�e Agreement.
VIOLATION .OP PITf�IN COULTY AIP.PORT REGUL•ATIOP75 . • .
Sections 2-5 ,and 2-6 of the Pitkin County Airport F;egulations
specify that commercial activities, including ,retail fuel sales,
. are not permitted without the prior approval of the Board . of
County Commissioner�. h•either the Lease Agreement in effect .
between Tailwinds and .the County, n�ot any other document or
communication betw�een Tail�winds� and the Cou'nty .inc3icates. that
Tailwinds has been gi�ven such approval. In� Fact,. the land use
application currently pending before �Pitkin Count�y with respect
. . . 1
to Tailwinds ' reRUest to locate a fuel far� at the Airport makes
it clear that no such permi�sion has beer, granted. Such f uel
sa.les are therefoce ir. violation of . tFe Pitkin County Code.
These sales are subj.ect to the enforcement. provisfons of the
Airport Rea�Iations, and continued violation may subject you to
fines, i�mprisonment,� or prohibi.tion- of use and occupancy of Sardy
Field, a� provided in Article 50, Title 4 , of �the Pitkin C.our.ty
Code.
VIOI.ATIOh OF LF.ASE AGREEFIENT �
In accordance with Section 15 of the Lease Agreement between the
E3oarcl of County CommissionErs of Pitkin County, and Tail�winds, .
Ltd. , dated December. 10, 1:'84 , entitled, "Termination and Modifi- �
cation, " you are herekiy notified �of non-compliance with the Lease
Agreement. . In accordance witr. the Agreement, you are requested
to cuce the defaults he�rein specified within thirty t30) days .of
receipt of this .notice, or ttie Lease Agreement will be automa-
� tically and fully terminated as provided therein. The Lease
Agreement sFecifies in Sections "2, 11 , and 17, that Tailwincls
shall comply with all. rules and regulations of Pitkir. County: As
indicated above, you have not con�;liea with Sections �2-5 and 2-6.
of the Airport Fegulations.
Paragra.ph �7 of �the Agreement pntitled, "Lessee Operatior.s, " �
specifies the scope of yo�r permissible activities at� the Air=
port. These do .not include retail fuel sales, �s. indicated by
the terms of �t•he Agre.ement, past piactice, and� the tecros of� }�o�r
pending requests for er.pansion of� you.r operations at� the Airport �
into� the a���ea of fuel sales. �
Fy t•he tertris of y,our Lease Agreement and your agreemer.t with Aspen •
Base Opera�tions, .you are permitted to �fuel yaur , own aircraft� in
the location of the tie-downs sub-leased from AFtO. The fueling
of aircraft in any other loca�tion, .including area leased by the
County to .ABO, is in violation of Airpar�t Regulations and the
Agreement. In accordance with Section .l3 of the Agreemen.t en-
title�, "County Iteservations, " you are �airected to : re.frain from
fueling any aircraft in the ramg ar.eas currently unaer. �lease to
ABO or available. to thE public for the purF.ose of ground movement
o� aiicraft. The fuelir.g of aircraft by you in such locations. is
deemed to interf ere witti the use of the Airport by others.
, Z . •
Please cor�rect these deficiencies within th�irty . (301 days: Feel �
free to contact tre Airport Nanager or myself Go. discuss these
matters in more detail.
very truly �yours,
John Eldert � . � .
County Mana�er � ' . : � •
JE:cd . . • . .
Attachment ' . � � .
cc: Richard Arnold, Airport Manager • �
Thomas Fenton Smith, County Attorney �
• . . 3 . ' .
PEAT e�at,Marwick.M����,���& �o.
►�05�o�r�uoX soo�
MARWICK �n Francisra Intcmalional Ai��ort
San Frnncisrn,Califomia 94128
415-347-952 t
Airport Consulting Scrviccs
April 5, 1985
• EXHIBIT
J r.� • � J
., !'J �
Mr. Richard Arnold �^
Airport Manager
Aspen-Pitkin County Airport
506 East Main Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Fixed Base Operator and Charter Operator Privileges
Dear Mr. Arnold:
In response to your request of February 15, 1985, this letter
summarizes our comments on the full-service and limited-
service fixed base operator privileges at Pitkin County
Airport and offers guidelines for evaluating existing and
proposed policies for assigning those privileges. The letter
is divided into five parts: (1) background, (2) review of
existing contractual relations, (3) market demand, (4) recom-
mendation of a preferred alternative, and (5) policy
implementation.
BACRGROIIND
In 1984, the County selected Aspen Base Operations (ABO) as
the full-service fixed base operator (FBO) at the Airport.
IInder the FBO Agreement dated October 1, 1984, ABO provides
both essential and optional services and facilities. Among
the essential services and facilities are aircraft fueling and
maintenance, crash/fire/rescue (CFR) services, and the
maintenance and monitoring of County-established Airport
security requirements. ABO is also authorized to provide a
full range of commercial aviation services "commensurate" with
the air traffic at the Airport.
Tailwinds, Ltd. , a limited-service FBO providing primarily
aircraft charter services and flight instruction, has been
operating at the Airport since 1979. We understand that
Tailwinds is now requestinq permission to lease land and
� 2
Mr. Richard Arnold
April 5, 1985
develop a fueling facility. Tailwinds wishes to fuel its own
aircraft (perform self-fueling) from the facility, and provide
commercial fueling (and perhaps other FBO services on a com-
mercial basis) to the public in direct competition with ABO.
The County is concerned about the ability of the market to
support multiple fixed base operators and the ability of ABO to
balance revenue-producing services, such as fueling, with
required nonrevenue services such as CFR. The County recognizes
that any actions to resolve these concerns must be consistent
with (1) the appropriate degree of competition in a limited
market such as Aspen, (2) the Federal Aviation Administration's
position on competition at airports, and (3) the effect that the
proposed facilities might have on the long-range development of
the Airport as set forth in the Master Plan.
Because of these concerns, the County is now seeking to clarify
its policies on granting commercial and noncommercial privileges
on the Airport.
CONTRACT REVIEW
The existing policy is not explicitly set forth in a single
document, but is reflected in the descriptions of privileges and
obligations in the operating agreeraents. Attachment 1 provides
a summary of the contract privileges and basic operating obli-
gations of ABO (the full-service FBO) and Tailwinds (a charter
operator) . The attachment also shows additional services now
provided by ABO and Tailwinds, and the services proposed by
Tailwinds, as interpreted from a communication to the County
c]ated December 28, 1984. The following table highlights the
services provided by the two operators:
Services Provided
p�gp Tailwinds
Fueling Aircraft charter
Line service Sc�eduled air service
Aircraft maintenance Flight training
Terminal services Aircraft management
Other services "commen- and rental
surate to the nature Sightseeing flights
of the market" (includes
aircraft charter)
._ �: ����
� 3
Mr. Richard Arnold
April 5, 1965
As a full-service FBO, ABO is authorized to provide certain
required services and may provide any other services at its
option. Tailwinds, in contrast, is limited to the services
defined in its agreement. It should be noted that these priv-
ileges relate to services provided to others on a commercial
basis. Any tenant may perform simiZar services for its own
account, consistent with standards of safety and land use set
by the County in the tenant's agreement ancl the Airport Rules
and Regulations.
In this context, Tailwinds could perform self-fueling, so long
as safety and operating standards are met. These standards
are not explicitly defined now in any agreement between
Tailwinds and the County and could be spelled out in a
specific noncommercial fueling permit.
MARKET DEMAND
Because Tailwinds wishes to provide commercial fueling
services, the market c3emand for services at the Airport was
reviewed to assist the County in determining whether a second
commercial fueling operation would be feasible or desirable.
The level of genera� aviation services provided at the Airport
should be consistent with the demand for such services. The
primary indicators of demand for fueling services are the
number of general aviation operations and the gallons of fuel
flowage (both avgas and jet fuel) . These indicators reflect
the number of seasonal and year-round general aviation based
aircraft, the level of seasonal and year-round general
aviation tiedown and hangar demand, and the types of general
aviati�n aircraft using the Airport or based at the Airport.
Scheduled airline operations have little effect on the demand
for fuel. The airlines occasionally take on fuel at Aspen,
but the amounts are a minor portion of the fueling operator's
total sales.
The number of aircraft operations at the Airport have
increased from 38,912 to 41,660 in the last three years, an
average of 2.3$ per year. This slow growth reflects the
constraints on aircraft activity resulting from the limited
capacity of the Airport, the high cost of fuel compared to
pre-1979 levels, and the seasonal nature of the traffic.
_ ___ _ �.� �_.�. ..__ .�..�...�.�.
� 4
Mr. Richard Arnold
April 5, 1985
Fuel flowage fees paid to the County by the previous FBO
indicate annual volumes of approximately 650,000 to
750,000 gallons. The stable level of fvel uptake is con-
sistent with the constrained level of operations.
Fuel flowage is typically the largest revenue source for a
fixed base operator and therefore has a material effect on the
operator' s profitability. This is reflected in ABO's financial
projections, in which fuel sales account for approximately 80$
of net sales.
On the basis of experience at other airports, the minimum fuel
flowage that can profitably support a fueling operator is in
the range of 300,000 to 350,000 gallons per year. On this
criterion alone, the Airport might support two fueling
operators, although their profitability might be marginal.
However, there are other factors in Aspen that argue against
allowing two commercial fueling operators:
• Constrained growth in operations
• Seasonality of traffic
• Costs of required services
� • Investment in facilities
} In general, these factors are likely to keep the revenue and
profitability of fueling (and other) operations close to
current levels.
I The limited capacity of the Airport will limit increases in
� aircraft operations and fueling volumes as well. Therefore,
it is unlikely that the market for fueling will expand enough
� to significantly improve profitability.
The strong seasonality in traffic, which increases the cost of
� providing services, is likely to continue. Costs of main-
� taining minimum levels of service may not be fully absorbed
� when demand is low, and more facilities are needed to meet
� peak demands than would be required if demand were stable.
CFR and security requirements add to ABO's costs and must be
recovered from other service revenues, primarily fueling.
Investment in FBO facilities must also be recovered from
; service revenues. On the basis of ABO's financial projections
,
�
� 5
Mr. Richard Arnold
April 5, I985
of February 14, 1985, about $170,000 was invested in the FBO
through the end of 1984. In this market with a limited
capacity to expand, establishment of a second commercial
fueling operator would put ABO at a competitive disadvantage
because of the need to recover these operating and capital
costs.
RECOMMENDATIONS
For the reasons described above, we recommend that the County
restrict commercial fueling to the full-service FBO and offer
limited-service operators noncommercial fueling privileges
subject to County regulations regarding safety, environmental
protection, land use, operating procedures, and insurance. The
reasoning behind the recommendation to limit commercial fueling
to one operator also leads to the zecommendation that the County
maintain only one full-service FBO. In addition to the fore-
going reasons, the County's current Airport development plan
severely limits the land area available for development of a
second full-service fixed base operator and related automobile
� parking, aircraft storage, fuel storage, and other facilities.
� Although a second commercial fueling operation is not recom-
mended, the County should consider offering Tailwinds a
' noncommercial fueling permit. On the basis of the size of the
Tailwinds fleet and the size of the Aspen charter market,
allowing Tailwinds to perform self-fueling would not
significantly reduce fueling revenue to ABO.
i
iIn establishing a noncommercial fueling permit, the Airport
� can maintain control of fueling activities, establish
appropriate fees, and enforce safety and operating restric-
tions and insurance requirements. Once these regulations are
established, Tailwinds, or any other tenant considering self-
� fueling, can determine if doing so is financially feasible or
acceptable. The County would also avoid even the appearance
i of discr`iminatory practices, since any tenant could apply for
jsuch a permit.
a
� It is likely that a fueling facility would require an invest-
j ment of at Ieast $225,000, based on the cost of two 10,000-
� gallon tanks and two fuel trucks. In addition, there would be
certain operating costs to meet County safety and environ-
mental standards. This level of investment and operating cost
will limit the number of potential applicants to those who can
demonstrate a cost-effective need for self-fueling.
... -m. rw�..r.r-r�r.. ...._. _._._
� 6
Mr. Richard Arnold
April 5, 1985
POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
We recommend that the County Attorney draft a policy
specifying what serdices are to be provided by the full-
service operator at the Airport and what privileges are to be
considered specialty services. The policy would define the
; specialty services, including self-fueling. A noncommercial
fueling permit should also be drafted in order to regulate
self-fueling operations, including fuel flowage fees and
taxes, insurance requirements, facility requirements, fuel
handler requirements, and standards for facilities, equipment,
and fuel handlers.
After the policy and permit are drafted, we suggest that the
County review them informally with the FAA regional office.
Although FAA approval is not required, FAA concurrence would
be needed if the policy were tested.
In the review with the FAA, the County could describe the
reasoning behind the policy and explain how the policy
satisfies the grant assurances regarding nondiscriminatory
i; practices. The review would allow the FAA to comment on the
;; policy and provide an opportunity for revision before final
adoption by the County. If the FAA does not accept the policy
I' as proposed, it will probably offer guidance about changes
( that will promote FAA concurrence.
IWe believe this approach will allow the County to resolve the
� current controversy and will minimize future problems.
We would be happy to discuss with you any of the ideas pre-
sented in this letter. If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely, „
� ��
e ey R ewy
Manager
JRL/sh
cc: Mr. J. Eldert
Mr. T. Smith
:i
:i
i
I
�;
�
. . .... ,._..._... -._._.runu�r �
� � �The Aspea Times
Box E r.:: ._, ; _ .
Aspen, Colorsdo �t�' � ' '
. 7-$•�
Is�:�.;:.��� . t?u,bt►� Zor�e-�i �s�
PROOF OF PUBLlCATION
STATE OF COLORADO ) COP�/ Of NOtIC@
) ss•
County of Pitkin ) •
I� �•11_11131ri �'. Dunataay do solemnly sK�ear that
I am thePUb1.7.ShE'T' of THE ASPEN TIMES;
that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part,
a
and publlshed in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has se:rtrx�x�uovx�r�:A�tD vse Cona
a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been pub- ���a-�o s�-'itoNSa
�y,��=l�ueuic�ot�
lished continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitliin, .���Y��a
for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior 7sei■c�.tome�aams,a�$,�� �
idwe �o.�a.t�t:aaae
to the ftrst publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- �,co,mty,a,�,e,a.,u��;�n. �
ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States �"�,�����m����.-.. I
raails as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of ��'��+�a.s.�+�w sLaiq�o
����r..�,.a�„p.rra�.• i
March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- �us—P�bc,��;a,� ,�
paper ie a weekty newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal �� �•" �'a1°'�
notices and advertisements with the meaning o[ the laws of the �°"�"��0!°���� - �
State of Colorado. F'r��.+a.�a+ier�wi �
as�,aao�a.t�..a,�cati..a.e�ai cao�i
'ns20�9,e,a:2fa. - i
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement a�as published sove�8 a;�.�,.,,.� �
in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly r.,�;a.amx�„�..����.� �
. i
newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive i»sertions; and
that the [irst publication of said notIce was in the issue of seid�' �
newspaper dated Jv're � p,D., 19 8� and that �
the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news-
�
psper dated A.D., 19_
�
C�����1��
;
SubscrIbed and sworn to before me,.a notary public In and for '
t ounty of Pitkin, State of Colorado, this /� .day of �
� S (
A.D., 1� �
I
.� .� �
i � / ,
_ ' \`'����..i �/i�'�� �
.� � . �
Notary Publtc V
, �
My commission expires � I
;
The Aspen Times
Box E r : � . : .. :�
Aspen, Colorado -- � . ��
� _ 7-�s�s'.
_ : ....---.. ....._....._
. .. : Ik���..�c,G.�o I
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF COLORADO � Gopy Of NOfIC@
) sa.
County ot Pitkin ) •
I� [•!i 1 i i am T3; DLi118.[�ray do solemnly sw•ear that
I am the P uUl l S�'le Y' of THE ASPEN TIMES;
that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, �����
and pubi(shed in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has ���N+�
a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been pub• �� ' �v�t�a a
lished continuousl and uninterruptedty in said County ot Pit3iin, ��� �� ��''��a�
y L�etle�.o�l�J'�dr;t-
for a period of more than tifty-two consecutive weeks next prior a;.c.wy:�•�:'�►+i°�O°�'°O°°"
to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- ��y°�������g'�
ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States ��'�O�"ti��.e.o"�°�'qsr��
malls as secand-class matter under the proVisions ot the Act of ���.�.��
March 3, 1879, or any amendments tbereof, and that said news- ��e.���'�. .��,y�,*;•
paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal ��..���ar'��ea�.'�
notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the ""��������
State of Colorado. ,°i°"''y�,�sieu�
��Or�n, arl'e s0.�..Qriil�sen
ThAt the annexed legal notice or adverlisement was published `'��� �����.�.
in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly �Y� a�m�s�•m����
newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and
that lhe first publication of said notice was in the issue of said
Jui1e 6 85
newspaper dated A.D., 19^ and that
the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news-
paper dated A.D., 19—
. �i'�g"l�L�i�%/L /
Subscribed and sworn to before me,.a notary publIc in and for
the County ot Pitkin, State ot Color,ldo, this // .day of
�
l� A.D., 19��
/ `-- . � . �
e��-�%�-� J���-.,..�
Notary Public
�S � b�� �
My commission expires j
i
f
�
�
Tha Aspea Times ,
aoX �
Asyaen, Cotorado t` •..-.� � • `�,, ��, : .:•.;
.. ., -�^�,�5�
�:. ., .� . _A3�(-�i�aU?111uSS N� .�
i
PROOF OF PUBLICATION �
STATE OF COLORADO � Copy of Notice
) ss.
Counly oF Pitkin )
I� ��1�1.�.lalil F�. 17LZT1�,L'78y do solemnly sw•ear that ����=�:.:.
eaawcs N.nN� ;
Publisher ''����r�
�rw�na+n�erncr �-- .•
I am the af THE ASPEN TIMES; , pvduC���sY��c
that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in art, �"�'�������
P ��. Od��i.�BR�fa�Pl�s�od
and publ[shed in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has i1ie'��°"����p��
�..lidieieusWs 71ree�tlalLs
a general cicculation therein; that said newspaper has been pub- ������r1°�'�`tl"�0'
dtLe tit�Ml�erir�mi�a�U-
lished contlnuously and uninterruptediy in said County of Pitliin, � a��leir �.�a
for a "___"-__lu��v�l bradrd
period of more than fiftyt��•o consecutive weeks next prior � �G„�,�ri.is.r., ri�.�.ca-
to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- � "'�'�'��1Ai,y�eQ"0t�'°�
.el�wf�s.s�s .ewee�
ment; that said new�spaper has been addmitted to the United States � �g�$ r
�.wir..�f ue,��� m�t�h�
mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of pn�w..ru..Lr��,i.1B
.�..e�.t.t�s 8an�P1.n af te.
March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- KwFe•�aDi�"
� paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified far publishing legal � ���' •�"i'�'M��"��R"°i°u°°�
�i,:.a�lyrl4R!�wYS G!�+!L!�
notices and advertisements with the meaning oF the laws of the • �� �'�`�'��„��.
State of Colorado. ,.;��ai..t�ets�u�'1'°�p�'
; � -db:' e�Y�1�i+,:C�a.ts w��ts A
. �`�'_ ���n/�► ���'�Nal'a'd
1 Th2t the annexed legal notice or advertisement �sas published ����■�ltds'�� 'w A++�s�
� in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly ' �p��'����p���
} ci.1��9a��mt��, P��be
newspaper for the period of '� consecutive insertions; and d��R������yo.,��°'�
i that the first publication oi said notice was in the issue of said e�.�rsa�.ro.ra�ay..��....o!wr�..'oe°
� �l�i��![TRi��CliiElllmt � W
newspaper dated �����s����
June 13 A.D., �s a5 and that ��,,...�+ai,�r..��t�u .. •��
� the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news• p;�;,=�'�i,w'�i.�`G������
`� . 1i.►..ri�l ieael.i�6.mtlrpop�
� `ara�Di�hiR;�jr�ili��le Gled n�tim�
paper dated JUly y' A.D., 19� �°�����10°0«1f�tl'
uid i.5loi.ai Ire uirrtis Cem�,eid ml Wer
Wo/�qp Jqs�6e��1!e dry.8ud fer the
p��a�Ibearpeiof�l peWwa'� �
7fO3 N011CB GIVSN BY ORD�OP.'fHB
l / BOA�D OF OOUN7Y CO�OOS�ONBRB OF
����j� / � �R11LIN�tfl'Y.00LABAOO.t`ial[16da7at'
Z( . �u:em�
' ' �' ��a�t.oa a�a��k
�yybliea�A�ep7SmesJorol].2D.lU.�7
� Subscrlbed and sK•orn to before me, a notary public 'n and for � �
t e Co' unt�of Pitkin State of Colorad his �. day of
Y � �-L �
�
A.D, 19�
Notary ublic
A1y commission expires
'
�
i
;
THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE SUN
Box �77o f:;-:�, , . .
S�owmas��illage�, CO 8'1611 � , , , -,
r � " � ... �'is��
PR�OF OF PUBLICATION .- 0p�
STATE OF COLORADO
_ : . '. : ��-i�Su"''��1(prdu
County ef Pitkin
Copy of Notice
�/ n --- r
l, f�a d�4 /��. !���4 ct s �� do solemnly swear that [ ��"��8a1 No�ice` � N011(Z 18'�F[J� ''GIYEN�
!t:? S.7C li.!.« f.f- ?+. ' � (71N�u�t'M`AKIIN 9f-f,�!(!I�
srATE pF CoI.oRA_DO, '.C,�u,�; 1o,.M,��sa�i;,; m3;.,r
am the �5s-�.���j,f�.��� of THE SNOWMASS SUN, �:;apU�ypgp�J� �..arw, ar..ne a:�rr:rw�•
tha the same is a weekiy newspaper printed.in wholc or in part,and k,;? � ,., ;:. ` ���r'Or�M•�b'!q�'��
published in the County of Pitkin, State of Cotorado, and has a ' " '�' . ' '�'�����'��°
'"'NOTlC'l�OF-HF.�RING ; ;r.r r�m.d.rb:;�i�!�i���:
general circulation therein;that said newspaper h�s been published j� r�„ � . ;�pt<:� �i��selri�•!tN tM�
continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitkin, for a r - tS�I�p�N ' • irn���N�!'�4'!�
period oF more than fifty-tw�consecutive weeks next prior to the i.•T�'��JS���� ' �������`���
first publication of the annexed legai notice or advertisement; that � % .����TION ;�.°��������:
said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States mails as '�� ' ``�ISTRILT .' ' (1�1 M,r'�i:�e:�is 1ho�t l�'riej
second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3, • - ''• ' ' ' • f 1��°����°�.-�
1879, or an amendments thereof, and that said new a er is a ��C `x�� � ''�Y� � ' y r�' � �' 'i
Y P P �G�VQi tW trpe.wae ANi;wW Ne: ,1'HIS:NOTIC�.C[VEI�t 1Y O�Qe1t;
weekly newspaper duly qualitied Por publishing legal notices and Cou�?Orrk�1�yticarMr.N.lMklr, Ol+'.;771L.-�OA�D OF'DOUI!11Y'
advertisements with the meanin of the laws of the State of ��'+�0"+'+����'�' �� ��� ��
g �re1�M0%�sei�ib"fir lid M'e/�i �WUN'1'1f.:.COLORADO•''1'�5�11��
Colorado. � •;�:N�iie.-� ;•DAY:OFiUl�lE;1f�S .;•`
:DWkY.7fe 8tnke!'IM�M�dMii; ' - - ; . '
� That the annexed legal notice or advertisemeni was published ���!'��!��M�!�" i� �r.��Id� Cow4 �'
in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly °-�������` � , .� -.: � ��'
ve���■�Nit�r�i�el�tls� `"' " t
•- -tf' c. : '. `,-lalWi�i Jae-13.1�.17�M Ab 4r;
newspaper for the period of � consetutive insertions;and _•�:..�g �FURT�R`AV6N�'.�!!�-�0��!'= ' t '�•--j
that the Cirst publication of said notice was in the issue of said !�.�4=�J'� M�'�r'�';
�A�w�����: .
-� :�t�!�N:�:�10!��r
newspaper dated J K,�<<° (3 A.D.. 19�, and that '�j���w�w lii alr.
the last publication of said notice was in the issuc of said newspaper •w�:�!•:��`�
t E:81;.XiM:-�M:'M:ii11 j.i:w;
A.D., 19�. ':�4•�MM�b_�tJ�b.!!�!.'[fe';
dated �e�w d IM Hwl�i�M Mi�ati
i diw Me.i�ef�1 i��nlee lhi,
��^� N��� ���'�.
; Nf.i�e R�e�wd..nYipkt,..r:a h..i .
j � � �.irlt I�:�IIi�:��ii1�IM��i
'' Mi�y. e'a�IMrb' M!w!rit oc'
< i��� _:�/ �_�� �tlisL�nlall�a ;
� ( . ;. .
/ � Zfe �.'/��jiMi OWkt M�/dM nN
r—'=---—
;� wl�1±1M"�!M';�lN1�
� Subscribed and sworn to before me,a notary public n and for ����;��°�Ir'ehiie�
' the County of Pitkin,State of Colorado, this Z��� day of ;r� �4..�+d�d �...4�.
i1�/N���ri,���ii M�'rr�►��.
�� ;a�i w.A.�.ri�elMe Mp1 Mud/-:
�/C�t�P A.D., l9�-� S1N�K1YsNM����;
i ;Nl�R�eaMtl!�-DYYktJ!,.��iW�
'Mi'�lii�lii;C�tf,�tielt�nM.�ean-
rir'�0(lfei+!aldd�l�!`ri!�N wr.ta�
` �SsN R�•,. -. ;c:', �
:,,.:..... ._,. .
� . .. _,. ,..:
, ;,:,: ,:�', : .. ;
� � �� �-..
,. �,�, ��Cc�n '•: A�f N����d�i N�N�f'�
Notary Pubtir �M�W j���Err�,1�
wKw�t rw.M�..�.,:r.;ari
::irlo.�Ir�W"w�p��r.�.�g�
�' 'Iw MMi d.Cw�b-CN/M�Niiis rii
My commission expires��' • 7� ���'s �p����1�:;
THE SNOWMASS VILLAG� SUN
Box 5�'�70
Snowmass-�illage-, CO 81611 � .
��: l;r.':�r;.� Cn
PROOF OF PUBLICATtON ��, �� : �;�.��. -
STATE OFCOLORADO �� 1 j �
���"��s l ib�-cG.c D
County of Pitkin
Copy of Notice .
1.—��—L��. , %.� �c.�,<��� do solemrtly swear that I ��r� �N0���7 N07`ic� te'�_FUR'�N� -CIYF,N�
- 1?' r v ' -. • � �1��prfrMt b.SlCNOt'.1�I�7�(3�i'i
am thc. Ass-� � � �'. � � .$TATE OFGOLORADO :.CworMo Re.MeA st�Mea. 1f73. 'iu:
�� � ,..� �e.k!_of THE SNO�\'MASS SUN, � � � � ( ;■�a� 1k owser ot-reii propeiAp_�
tha the same is a weekly,aewspaper printed�in wholc or ia part,and �UNTYOFPITY1Nf ;, ,����Dro��d��f�k•a•!
] petltloa w116'U(e'DMt�iq Coiu!ie ud'
published in the Count}7'af Pitkin, State of Cotorado, and has a :Np�'[�p�'HEARII�� I �tor;PttldnCo.�;le��ntl�fMNaneh;
gencral circulation therein�hat said newspaper has been published "$ERVICEPI.AN' ".' i '"�'�°P�' �� �� irom tlie_
p�touA DWtkt,:$oci peNltoe may ife�
continuousty and unintcrruptedty in said County of Pitkin, for a � 'TH�'ASPEN�SNO�1!MAS3`.' ; !
A9 � {(u�fd;ieytime after tre�oelitlos tor.fre,
period of more than �fty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the :,��NOBDIC�RECRLA7Z.ON,. , orp.Isauoa ot.t6e Dieuk�:b tlled wltb�,
first pubtication of the annexed legal notice or adver�isemenr. that , DISTRIG?' '" ; -t�eDNMetCoirt;b�tpotlieerehaati�,
i ::' :. •"( ' j '(10)'di�.bNore He dq'1lited for tYe j
said ncwspaper has been addmittec! to the United States mails as :_�;���.�.��y� ;��b�tie a�aitstlo�il peUtloe. :
sccond-class matter under the provisions oC the Act of March 3. GIYlrt.;lYM tM�wwr f■�/,•wMr�e, :,�• �.,;. •�: : �
1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said newpaper is a r���«�'!��!f�' '�� NoTtCE..GIYBN BY ORDER;
weekly newspaper duly qualified ior publishing legal notices and �'�'s�����"' OF 7HB ,SOitRD ,;OE;=COt71�11'Y�.
�iM�'�idiisl��•I�e=�i`.�NMiMii CONUNISSIONFFB� OF'�� lITYINI
advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the State of �/pi�is=N�e=�ieeMlN:, CpUNTIf� �p�,pltApp� ?HIg iitii �
Colorado. .Drnlet.7b 8w�1e�!!r�M nIM�/�iDA1f OF`7tA�L,If�S � i �
.Me�wY�ntiwM U1140111oe ! . . ._.. :�_..��_ _. j
7hat the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published � �� y ` ����`��' � �����
�;�;':•ii , � �1. .�y;'..-_�� Y�____—:.�,� 1
; ;. Y
in the regular and entire issue of every number of said week! . ' -` t
Y c • ,•,�. , ' .EhMrMd Jos 13.30.27 iM 7�4 4.;
N07�C6 �i8 AIRT� .GIYSN�� '
:•
• • a - � • • t�.r.�_snu.w�nrn�r�l,..:�_---:a.'-{
ncws pa per for the period of- � c o n s e c u t i v e i n s e r u o n s;a n d I r W ti f:O�M e !t.U e C w V�Ce�•�
that the first pubtication of said notice was in the issue of said ������'�'��'
`��Mie��r,wY•Sw�1n:PW:
� :�r/�iMi.Me��Mi:w�M:wY d� '
newspaper dated ,J�cw� 7.0 a.D., 19�., and that :IMp�W�i��ii�3�1f6.MN!.
the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper '��!.��c�rO'�~�3a��'�'~
�'11t�Mil:�M��7��4i 1lb.'1Le
datcd ;i�l�ol�Hrnl�j'iW w/i'eer;
A.D., 19_. :riiw.tie4!/N�e��M:IM�nln::l'1�::
:.N�:lii ��.�AAw%!"Mwiir 1
�NM�Me�1er��OMMIet�b f�i
` :��,wY tK r�/Iw.a,lw1�11M if.j
� / �MN�. aMIOr�► �nr!1y �r i
,� , l� �,� �� ,+r.�w�n�r.s■.w.ew.. , ;
f1 �;r :: � .
_ c �Lr _.;• � : . . S
l t'���N/I�MI/��L'1�r�:
!aiM1/�!r wllt �M Arl�. �eMd;:
Dlidld i.N�,t a�/�i�f�i
Subscribed and sworn to betore me,a notary public in and Cor '!WY ci�q �.•�, �,=
[he County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, this. �{� day of `�.�•���'M���W�
aw M�::A sie��M�':MIeM/r�*!��
/ i�N 1�aN���/Ai�w7erw�;
�i�c�C A.D.� I 9`�� 1 Af�rae de�Mlr�DIMAet:b rn�iiir�
�Iir M�'tNi�hrq,�k Y/4o�n'�
tt�j�r•�p/ea wwqyi MAl��.rr1�1
�•'�� ' .
� Aq'!w��w�/i'!/eq li I�e�l
ltic.«-� • �_��L' C N�l��r1�Iet.wM n�wl�;
�lotary Pubti� � W MMN�s'M.e�oebid IYe�1M:
�eM1;�iww�eMr a wnn�.t uie`
■nlb�i�1 w�11�ei n��t:1e��
tM 1e�i�f Coaq.C�/��o
. . ,
My commission expires ST�- ��i�� '=��h'-�'-�a��•`:: '
THE SNOWMASS vILLAGE SUN
Box �'�70 ,-... :;,
-�° cl, �-�_ ,;
Snowmass��Village-, CO 81611 r7Tt{Ir� �;�_
Pualic lIc�ri;;� ;.. �
�4�a : �:�c�s!
PROOF OF PUBLICATION Su,,���t :A�..c�b� w�
ST'ATE OF COLORADO
County of Pitkin
. Copy of Notic�
r!' r ,�0�t 7 „ � j NV■R���� w•��.
i. /�u✓Ilc 7 /Ji�/. ���.� do solemnly swcar that t � r�" � ce:• �:�.ti;e�db� �t-i�)r,
��'�y, �; �.;.., •.. -[7olarN�,b�YM`BYI�MM_1l73''r,{
� �-�. l�G�f' � 'STATE OF COIARADO '�"�+ �•w�ir ot r'at:reo�at>>
am the 5., �� ��1, i of THE SNO�VMASS SUN; � w1�Y'tie�o�oiii'pYWet, Or•��
tha the same is a weekly.gewspaper printed.in whole or in part.and ,��UNTYOFPTT�N� 'Metltlei'wNY�Ye' �6o4e�i''�i
� ' , .: c-;,.t ,. , forllUd�CMNf����1
published in the Count�n'%f Pitkin. State of Colorado. and has a � _ ,NpTT�OF�ARtNG. _
r-�wl..jcNwq w,�ae1MM;llre�`.1re'.
gencral circulation therein;uhat said newspaper has been published I .: .:•,�$gRyj�pj,AN: .,. ; : �N,�������y�
continuously and uninterrupted(y in said County of Pitkin. for a THEA$PEN/SNOWMAS3 �Ire
I ' f�ii:�iftlM dMe'M��IMIM
period of more than fifry-two conseCUtive weeks next prior to the � :;NORDICRFCREATION .:: �Npri�w�.tu.DM�ktr,deiwNY'
first ublication ofthe annexed le al notice or advertisement; that � -IIISTF,IGT IMDWieeC�r'�►M��tIM�r�.�'.
said newspaper has been addmitt d to the United Statu mails as • .� "` . . � �p'������������
lU1IJC 'N017CE •-ffi I�Y 'Mrl�MM�e�p�IntleMlµtltl�i. �
second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3, i CiVEI�f�it't�n'w�f■i�%wl��e : • ' ' � :
1879, or any amendments thereof. and that said neN�paper is a �����`���r M lMrl�' I� Np,n�`�:� p�;
w e e k l y n ew s p a p e r d u l y q u a l i�e d t o r p u b l i s h i n g l e g a l n o ti ce s and ��'�M0'������' �O! TBR:.�O�AlD :OF::OOUM'Y!
nYM Me�iwb t�r Ns Mrl�i ;�II�IOW�h OF:° .lIT�IN�
advertisements with the meaning of the laws of thc State of ;�� N� y� � �
Colorado. p6bkt,'Ifi 8�n,ks!In aM nWM• ����7'�8.Illi� �
� DAY Ot 7UN6;il�i t
ioesew�rs irw w Se 1��ie OMke . :� ' �
That the annexed legal notice or advertisemcnt was published 'w ����.�� ' �� �� .� �
N��'� Lenlb Muu. tNiY Co�ls Quic.
i n t h e re g u l a r a n d e n t i re i s s u e o f ev e ry n u m b e r o f s a id w eekl y , . . . . ' �6%l t s e�e�l e r!
NO?ICE�.IB i[JR7�IER GIVFdU ' r i '_ -:, :' fi. :
newspaper for the period of � consecutive insertions;and 1i�t; b Q�rer et Me Ceul�.Ca�. F iNtiMM�r�.1;2�.27�ri J�qr;��.�
that the first publication of said notice was in ihe issue of said �����!�!!!h��+�. ��!��!!�.�..'"`'._ : :. .
�hMe,�.op-Mli Benk+s.l4a • ".
� iii riiNM Vei�eib w�'ie iili ie
newspaper dated ,Jcr v�� ?`7 A.D., 19�� and that tre'CoiiWeie's�oi�S�f E:M�li .
the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper &'�A��'r�!M�'�����a
MeM!fs Jre�'i�1.M�J�b'��Il�S.1tie
�.�.IM;H�e1�M�/;M Io eor
dated A.D.. 19_. �iia�W-�ii�ue,�:et Qe,6r�ke�Pln:
i(_,tre•_-�iMi�M`•::A�ewir
Nait R�efwtlN DMrkt�ii N`fo1�.
. �;��[ir M�/WL.�`�MMIN.�F'
.a l�w+"'a�lbr4'�ji�nli��or
_ j ' '�li�"IM 8w�lee�.,;:;::-:;.
L' Z< ��._ .� _ .,..-:._ :�� .
, . . .;:, .
•7fe N!!wel.Dl�ekt b��is�rs
, ;�oMl�r:wllY:=tM,.Aq,w.v&iiol;
_.Dl�lif.el.a.Ni:`I.i�/weew'_I�d�ie
Subscribed and sworn to before me,a notary public jn and for ;lNkli';CNiy_�.;.�,=eil,'.'two,
the County of Pitkin, Statc of Colorado, this 7_S�a�- day of ��:�"������:�
ai/M�.A;-Mre*rdee Mpl:�'+If
� p�1 tl IYt/�N�/A�YBi�w�.
�//_�v�� A.D.. !9�sr ±l�or�lle�:DYelet r i�iile�
i l�_Iri;lNkl�Cw[�'.Ltik a�i.h�eir�
t Me'i Ofeee iw�iy�i Ire�f��:�.b;
S'N.�.r � ''' ��
' �.
/� �`'Aq`N�M,'�w�ili,N'�!�-1�.IM;
l�ucs�� -!L -•; '�N����W'��•M�:
tJotar Public / �:I��M!:rlN�4�Me�el�iN•6o�;1re;
Y ��.a.i�a�a riK_a.�..�.:t�;i,�
�':ee:lee�I:...Mr wirt.e`n�.:�l to
t�e 1Ni�qf Ce�q'�G�i�MilNins'i's;
My commission cxpires� z��5�_ .������10���":
THE SNOWMASS vILLAGE SUN
. �
sox �770
Snowmas�'Vil��ge�, CO 81611
, ..� �.; ,Yn. c;o-" .';: .,
� . . . _��•-.: r-..
PROOF OF PUBLICATION ''' `'`" �� � - � � �
- - , � .. ,�,:.,-��.-_, .
. ^
�.
STATEOFCOLORADO •_ • �•°'".
.: ^� - � �� ' S �61r�
County of Pi�kin
" " Copy of Notice
I.�C�v(G M. Ic•.t�s, do solemnly swear that [ ��A-�'-�0�.�� j�W�NO����'�:i
n kry�n*r COUNT�'OF t1T[il�T ,,r�+w.ww u.wwlet"c..�t f.'..�;
am thc_H�sf. �u�('S�ev of THE SNO�VMASS SUN, �r�fi t ` {.�- '� • �_ ' ''rta�l��•�"���
� �110'1'�CL bF•HCAWNC ' ; � �•.�e�•w.6:.;�.'
1ha the same is a weekly?aewspaper printcd,in whol�or in part,and � x '' ,�����l�M�MI'M.�
J Sl�t'VICL►':PI.AN�:- �w„�i�.`:ri�ui lMMM�hr 1�.,!
published in the Countj►:of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has a , T�EASPEIIT/SNOR►MA33 , ;�«�p��r�j� �
gcncral circulation thercin;that said newspaper has bcrn published �"�'�ORDICRECREATION `• '�MDM�WC�t�N��liwWil� i
continuously and uninrerruptedly in said County of Pitkin, for a � ''�,'a��t ,.,`DISTRIGT ... ; (Ih��d�n�e.w mM hr;�Ye ;
period of more than [iCty=two c:onsecutive weeks next rior to the �"''' � �� � °��~���'= •
n �t11LIC -NOiK� 18.:�Y : 1 . •,
! rtn
first publication of ihc annexcd Icgal notice or advertisement; that �V�I Iwf Ikne'wjw�AlN�wlq�tw ;�78�.Ndl'lQ;Q�t =1l.ORDli,�
l. ..�,..
said newspaper has becn addmiued to the Unitrd States mails as �:�'�����`��N.�MId�' OF 't'HE•_M1A1D�,.O�;.;CW1N1Y�
!��br C,eI�eM�,:�8�nlea!1�•�M ;:,-,•0l-: ,MT�t:
sccond-class matter under the provisio�s of the Act of March 3 =N� �;�:�.�e���:���;�� �g illi�'
1879, or any amendmcnts thereof, and that said newpaper is a �Aii�i/HNwa�:, A1�e.�.�1N� , .pAYpR7UNl,•��'.i
wcekly newspaper duly qualificd for publishing Irgal notices and ,�'�!�!�.����M ; • :: � �t= '` ' `.'... �
�iiew ife Mw o�0e l�li!OIIlee :�'�yr=.�GN4 �t i
advertisements with the meaning of the law�s of thc Statc oF ±,`����,��R���.� ;,.. .
Colorado. ����N�� ' �R°����,
� '�a� 'l�MMei Jue 13��.27 iM J�f,/�, :
That thc annexed legal notire or adv�rtisemcn� �vas publishcd N0R7Q;1g FUR7� '1����"o'r^!nrS�.;
in the rcgular and entirc issuc of every numbcr of said wcekly �+h a'M!W.M� �4�"'
i' �f�e�if'lMkb Cer4.C�INrr�.:
j�l'�We BNi�1y M"rN 8wvlir�r'
newspaper for the period of I consecu[ivr insrrtions; and f;�N•�:�.�:M.y�,�:'; ;
that �hc first publica[ion of said notirc was in thc issuc of said r�Q����.�!�,R.Mi`
;,&..�.NS�;CN�Yr.'nt 2.1s.�,�''
�;�I[!Mq.Ir.Mi iq K J�y,1l�{
ncwspaprr dated �� �:U., 19�.5 and that ;��eK:�M � .
R�•�e.�w i.a�.-,,
the last publica[ion of said notic was in the issuc of said newspaper •���!�N!b;if•!M,�Bw!k+e`��.
;� tlie.,jw�iry.:.iAiMi/8i�iiii�"''
N��e lSawtlN DbtrkR�M te foe� :
da�rd A.D., 19_. a irb Hr
M�Mre�RMNNIa�af �
Ma'rt+ �MIeMb .�r6i� 'or..
�Nw/Morlq lie 8�nk+e llr. .�, .
� ; , -
� f ��71..to.e.e.Olrhia ro..i�le,M+e,,
�:.Irlli�'t�e.:Ayu1', geroil?
�� , I. DMikt:m No..l W�eiw�j I�ely��;
; � �4.M�ehcM oM. fwo.
r�ne;lav,lln;�tr.�N.�t.d�e
u�a..A.ore�ifle lepl.�.
Subscribrd and s��orn to bcforc me,a notary publi�in and for �,���0�A�/8�sw��
[he County of F'ickin, Statc of Colorado, this �.�,'�{ day of ,::�;=���!!'!�!:�_!�
� �1�Ir lIOIt Ci�1s�k r/��eor:.
iehOf�a w�iq!�fiN�:ti,
��A.D., 19�-.��. �l�N� , ,,: ._ ;
.,��~s�
s�'��,,� ', � 't
'r,Aq MrM�'Ais lhM�1 I�:IM. .
����tlM�Irble.l.!RM nNrb�
il�t'�j�y M�:wiMi�tr.�l:tlie�
• �el��Mik1:NMr M��d d 1M�
��. � �Ii�iill..riiii wi�nwit a
:�;acary Public .����`�'��N
w�u..��:r�::i.ii.w.�� .
. SP/J� ZL. /�i�� ��NOIfCi�,IS�,�lllrll� �GivElv .
A1v commission cxnires �7�.�w�M M�cll�i"b-1,7!!q), :
� �C�I�:�nIN/?81Mi11� 1f73�.�,
. €Mi!i1�:`!M°!�i'ii'r_.�f-_�.N�!M�b,:
The Aspea Times
Box E .
Aspen, Colorado .. �, ��-
. � ....
,. �.•��)r cr�-�.sT ("l
. �-�--- ---.-.....
PROOF OF PU6LICATION
STATE OF COLORADO ) CO�l�/ Of NOtIC@
) sa.
County of Pitkin ) .
i� !!i l l i am R, nUT18,��1c'1.y do solemnly s�•ear that
I am the P�•�l�a_1Shf'.1° of THE ASPEN TIMES;
that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, In whole or in part, Pueuc�No'rlce
N0710E IS HEREBY IVEN thot e Wie hw- .
and published in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has ing will he Meld on Mondsy,auir a,t�es,at x16
m bd'mc ihe Board of Count Commiriona�of'
a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been pub• �'iUcin Caunty,cotor,ao �n�he comm�..im��,
lished continuousl and uninterru tedly in said County of Pitkin, M`eu°g R°°'°'e�cts"�°""�r�°"`u'm'°a aos
Y P Ead Mein Stnet,Mpen.Color�do.b mneider an
for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior smendent W the Alrpat Ruln end Reguldioru
perwd m morni eudew.More linity.
to the ttrst publication of the artnexed legal notice or advertise- .�utd75�etvoru�e�iu�tocAUniyc,�ii►�r�ri
Rules�nd!te lsliotul be emended w�lh the
ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States �n.�uneM or�on 3&1.1 u fdkwx
mails as second�class matter under the rovisions of the Act of `�'1.1:7Lep�uviaioroofScction2•18notvilh-
P elanding.tAe Airport MansRer siull have the au-
March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- ��r b��c,.ritk�ann�,sw�,.ub�ea.w
paper is a weekl news a er dul p g g ��eaonditlons,bhot.�ir6albonopenton
y p p y qualified for ublishin le al L�eedetUieAirportbtakedf6nmsndlendetfJw
S� Fie1d betw�een the houn ofB�D am and T:00
notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the w e�nuin'rtme."
State of Colorado. 7be amendment u p�npoxd wouid natend the
moming aurfewb6:00amforhob�irballoonopef-'—
a Copi��oflhepropoecdammdmmtuervai{sble
ThAt the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published �n CouM ckrk•,om«.r�ct�u coune cours-
in the regular and entire issue of every� number of said weekly e�.��+'ns���'�rp ���
:e°�.ddr�asiaa� u�s2s-ss8.'���"ec the
newspaper for the perlod of � consecutive insertions; and � Boenu oR courrrtir co��or�es
that the first publication of said notice was in the issue ot 58Id UF PITKIN COUN7'Y,���
: Ch�irnun
newspaper dated Jun e � p,D., 19 8 5 and that ����Q��o T��+oo�!uK 4,iess: ..
the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news-
paper dated A.D., 19_
� . / � �
Subscrlbed and sworn to before me,.a notary public in and for
t County of Pitkin, State of Colo o, this �,day of
i
A.D., 19 •� �-
:
i .
• '/i' / , 'f � �
Notary Public �'
/ /
My commission expires ' '
The Aspea Times
Box E
Aspen, Colorado
h � ?' "�".�
. . .. ., -11�±A..�r�af��
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF COLORADO ) COrl�/ Of NOtlt@
) ss.
County of Pitkin )
I� William r3, Dunat•ray �o solemnly su•ear that
Publisher - - ' rueucrranc� , ;,
I am the of THE ASPEN TIMES; N�����BY GIVEN tlut a Wk As,..
�Mtn e.e�w o4�a.r.a� a i�es■e a:ia
that the same is a weekiy newspaper prinled, in whole or In part, �..ub�.,ddcmm� �omm�rtooe„ar
and published in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has Mmee��R�ooni,�n iO��,,,��1°0j,,,,�•
a eneral circulation therein• that safd newspaper has been ��"���O�O��°°���
g � pub- ,mmdmene m eee rpoel xuk..na Repu.tlo,,,
lished continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of PiUiin, "� �"� �•� �.t-
�r,"'�.h.nt�nu.rv�r� ec� �i�ur-
for a period of more than fifty-two conseculi��e weeks next prior ��+���ao.tbeame�.d..�wrbe
auatmeu et a2�la..ro�b.e
to the first publIcatIon of the annexed legal notice or advertIse• `32�i.i:Tbs or9.ee�.y�e„ocw��:
ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United Slates •���1°���'"'�'��'��•w
y a•se nr�w.�,.,�w
mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of ����������
March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- ����weAour.ar�aoam.odq;op
paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal 71�.amendme■e opo��.;ontd�e�d y„ .
morni eudarto&�OO�far6at-�ir6dl0000p`
notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the ■eun,eS, : °PA`
State of Colorado. ���� ���� a�y.■.�
� ������4WIwM0.lI811,�.
1ni no+md biuieer�oaia Far fuetbo inkrma•
Th�t the annexed legal notice or advertisement u•as published ������M.mser K e6..�..
in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly eo�oR��aou�r�1ot�1��
reom�.�e'Ch.ke.n
newspaper for the period of � consecutive insertions; and ���'�'�'P'°�°"�'�110°�1�
that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said
newspaper dated J�e ?7 A.D., 19� and that
the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news-
paper dated A.D., 19_
�
� ��r�/ �������
Subscribed and sworn to betore me, a notary,�u6lic ' and for
the Count of Itkin, State of Col d�his �/ ' ,day of
.\
.D., 19
C , �
Notary Public �
A!y commission expires
i
�
i
i
_ .,�.�
THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE SUN
�
Box �770
Snowmas�'Vil��ge�, CO 81611
PROOF 4F PUBLICATION
STA7E OF COLORADO
Countyof Pilkin
' ' Copy of Notice
�. � �'� ' �e�4 ,t G � do so(emnly swear that (
am thc�l55-�. �.��,��r v of THE SNOWMASS SUN; iT,.,,,,,,.._..._
tha the same is a wcekl .�pews a �PUBI�C�I (.�'E � �k
y p per prinlcd,in wholr or in part.and ` �� ,�.,. � �
y . -r��.�, � ;, .
published in the Countj�`af Pitkin, Statc of Colorado, and has a �
+NM'/�61Q.�Y:CIVBN Wt't�e ,
gencral circulation thercin; that said newspaper has been published slNiliCiiN�M�i�.NC�r� i
continuously and unintrrruptedly in said County of Pitkin, for a ��,:�'�'..��:��'�+b.;1w� jet �
B�dls�'w��It 1�IklMd�(J�•.�
period of more than fi(ty=two consecutive weeks nrxt prior to the i
;b:CwelMre �t �i E.'�Ii &., ;
first publication of thc annexed Icgal noticc or advcrtisement; that A�;ap, �j�'�,�, M��y'� ;
said ncwspaper has becn addmittcd to the Uni�ed States mails as ��•a���M�Mnrotar,-�
second-class mauer under the provisions of the A�t of March 3. R� � �y �� � � �
;�MS. r M'�lMM►s lie A�inor.'°
1879, or any amcndmcnts thereof, and that said newpa�cr is a � ;u�.t� M�I� Yw1q y� � �
�veekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing Irgal notices and '� M �M A�wr. iM �
advertisements w•ith the mcaning of �he la�vs of �hc Statc of "������w� '
'u.e M u..w.r rdwM.�n�e Ni. '
Colorado. F���y�w����, �
, d�i�M�eY�n�N IM�.�
That thc annexed legal notice or adver;isement ���as published �g�i����O��'�'!'� ?
otJ�y;if�S. . . i
in the regular and cntirc issue of every numbcr of said weekly �:'!'S� ' `� i
' ::1���::; . - I.aeetl��.
nc��•s a cr for the criod of � J �' ����� �
P p p consccutivc insertions; and i, ; i �
that thc first publicatio� of said noticc was in thc issuc of said ���J�'4►.1�St��eS�ownr++::�.
���. ... ... .. . ; . , ,...___,�. . .
newspaper dated Gc .D., 19�5 and that
the las� publication of said notice vas in che issuc of said newspaper
datrd A.D.. 19_.
� a-.- • .
Subscribrd and s��•orn to before me, a notary�>ublic in and for
thr County of f'itkin, Statc of Colorado. �his ��1'`�- day of
'�+1u/�A.D.. I 9�
� � � �����
I:otar,Publ�c
�1v commission cxpires�D� ZZ /2S
..✓""°`.�`�'"�
�.�
�,���
'�
i
A �
ct� 0 G
�� Nf ' c � Z �
�, � N., p ,o � t�+ O
p�°' ��,•,�f a�:�, t� � � G�1 �t1
,.0� 't1 �O
.o ? A �'a�e�aw�o� °.°�� d � p � m
� d � � �� s�^ R� �� � ..- C� r � r'
� O."� °'� �v ��N`',��•9�� ���Q °' ' � � � 7
'" s°. ��� '"�a,N�,.o o °1 ° g�° 3 � y 's
'c £ y �o A r^ y � ���O N ';,,� p edo�A � � f' U � O
r d G (j1 ^ 7 ^ u� tY � "G'� r G� � �V%��N� d �t' t�h Q�� 4 �
'�' (n �, ,G G N ~ fl: i n A y A e A„G�O <y�''t d�0 C11 �`— N �
� � N v' O�ir, O d r ��•�9 9.t P�,. 4 Q?� .�C' l T'�-., in �i
n � j o.. ^. � �a,. Q o � ^' n A�°' �'�f� N N:� '�'' v �
Q � � i� � � '�� d A 0� 7' d Q
O O A A Q w tD >,'„�"'.A N f'O�O f0 a � C Q 7 .
'.� W 0, �,..,�,N C%• A� A i 'J �p 6 +j' Q^.0'W O�?� ti .
j.:
�'�' i ? � 7 �" �..�O O�^� tl W A O O 7 G '�J7 C 5..;.
�%. �' N � C j , �� r•� ���to.,°�•O�ro N� � r_
' tN fc tD '"" � o, N^to RC�' G ?o Cn�� Q ,�S
N � ? N .i. 0 �Q� 7N7 � � � � � .�-'..
x ""� N � y a � 7 a N .!�p.�p �N n p' f "`� ;!.
f � to v
.aA `.�'o Q � � � -..._� 3 A �,�,,,,��.°..s�ro z"`�a'�� '`�%
n �.�
o �. � o A ; .�v -��o d a ^� o f0�
p O � �n n n rn eye t�o ?9 4; ,,.C•7 {1� i:;�;
to A. � N �y�.R NW 4�O 3 �e ;•G .�O i9 -i
0 � � � pt � fU 0 O�r�9 m 'J' ��r��.;R fiA O t��'�
�e � 't �n y' 7 P�r te O ''O p.d'l �'(v.•G W �..
� p ? \ � 7 O �. 7 N � � � p � v'
� a � `�G ro£V� n A 4�.�..�d O C r A� �� �
O G 'S `S r� N �i N .�� ��r'�w�' .a.w � C'.,'.
Z ` n � +� f0 A m c o�ro s m o�o Q.�' n .• ? cx-"
"� u� iri �o cr y o,fc � C�.^ � se tt ? •�. <j�
��11�p u� G7 �0,� p'a�y?-nG•;��Gt.°. e°
�Q t� 19 N •••� � P�Cr r N C� 7 6.
c n �,i. °^o. ^�o.a^ n
r 1 � � � �� ��
� �N
\ �P� Q d'
� � O N �
? ^
N
v�
W
, , � �. ,
�3� c �Q.a -
� ,� �;a �8D y o3�n°0,�2 -
a p°$��°-a��:Q;-�aa� _ ` .. �
�, _�� . .
� . ��:�,0��`�`��o` , ` .
0
c . . ��,y,�o a1 � � T�;y .
� � . � 3�c .,�
A � -,,.�•- Q C O.x
,� . A� a � ��� �.�.�irn. .c
� ��►- � � '��a �o T •�
� �e�Q .o�c.��3 o F,n��L`!,� C::'
� 'o ` a� ���� o���� a�v, _
� —
�� �� ` -: �Q �,�'=�Q~.� � ��' '" -
� � : �:� ,•:$ ; -'.C7 ��.=Nz z �; . • � ,.�,��a. .� . .
Z'�. c� Q, ' � � o:� ��a � ` U � �.
� �m � nam ° a�.�= a�Q � .::,,.� ., .�.� !f'
< � . � �.��- -- ....m
Q � ��og. �'��yo �'���� T :� �:m �' ; ;
� Y � . ��� �. ;
p� '° w o.= �, � �v y v :.O�:r�,► J 1
.c� =� �. , � �
C H'�.H �_ 3 �?� . �y3" /� i
� : a a � n.r ?�� �� m � . OJ=Qj' �JJ ;
� �.��,p , g► �,�.���n q� 0 ;
0 0�� ` _�c?o; o p.. , �
~��.m �m � ��.��,�� _ ' 4t:n ��
� 0?� t"p
J('��
• - .a
i
�
��.
�
��� _
�-��`
�
���
_�.......--•�'°""'
� �
�o
• - t� u't � O
. ~ � ,a Nb 0 � C �1 �i �fl
�.N 7i N O't° p.f�'?'9 ^� "'� O � '�M11
.- y sv < ee ,� m m 70 „ .0
� .. „ x -n �n
? „ c+ n�o a � �
v'`�, m � N :.�^ o m o,. '� o� O n p C
� � �o °... � -� R � � u� ro� „ na� " 1 � U � m'
�e � o � £ w� ea � -n — G� �-
NC � �'v� �.G C� N�n•�m,3 r��.Q?0 a . y (� ,G r
p, C1 `� �, n �9 �O °^� ��mn ?� �''a^o+�� � . T 9 r �
j� .dc � u► o, � n d^ �� an �A�a��° ae�000L rm.. � c' •
3 tn a, ,. c A a o- ,,,, a.� � a a+� �o �- � v � � Z
f1 ,.r. 4. n f � G G, � ��o �`�,.�c a�'ro o.G 4 n rn +� O
� G� Q �+ �' o �c �a � a 3cmn,a;;og?� :^ C
3 � a, \. A n� �/4 'u+r'o n =.3 N�rd��' q�p 7� -
�N. +�' 7 � V" O �y t t�o a � io � N N G N p.n C�p �t ;' .
p �' 0' � 7 '� O� � 46ya�on�vZ"N r
� m p �tto ° � ' c� �.a;^��y�^�-r
� � a 7
� � O 7tA0 � 4� �i �� �A O.w p o C� p,d
n Q
� o c� ?• o � 30 0�'o,�-A7eP.�c=� n
0 p O �. O �.A. r� " N7Adda'.1y�
� o. � =°' `° n o Ay N�o 0 0.��'.°.� ry 3
0 R � � f A u� a r C1 �. t�,t0 �C .�O e0
,. �.G � pi p oi ts o�'?�'r.�"e � �C
S, p 7 �n > �� N � �' m0�`� � ^rN O�
in 3 N � " �0'�� O..r� r�N;G W O
d 4 7 S�. �� n w G-fl�a07�O C�,,,O� O
K ? N A t N � '' 7't7 �L�� N
� �G N N w� "�C Q O 7 f A� rA0-r� '..0� �w '? 1
� Q G A N '�^� in �0�"Y'6'T� A i`G d•G w N K
� n
cr ; o °-,�. ° o. A�o o.° A�o,.
N � ,.� ,y ..�
� �•7 A �
. �' Q p;. �'N .
O � •
.�` A ^
i
.� �:
i,._:
�`5,>.
�.:a
�,,,,�
�
�
,`
.� �
,.---`°
;
�
t . �
. �,
� � ` ,.. •-
r� . �
�. � : , ..
/ � ,:_r�.,
�.
v��Z
o� °�°.�° `�$�
•�?,s �$�o m =o�aa R'
,. ���$ ,.���i p � O g�v, _ >
, a �
T�NO.�, NQQ.G�tn Z '' t
�7? 0 ,,,,Q• � � fl � � . .
� G`" �p�
'�a Qo�afoy6 ^ �o03 � � m� �
, .,c: �
u, ¢ „�"'",.. ?, ,'r�i i. N 3r.0. (�1
`�. ; �N�;����Q�q O��p�''��,�: .�ri' '� N�
� ^ �
� ; �n ,0,�?:G, � .'�a,':� � `m`� `' . � � �'
a ' � � ' `.Q���';���' �`fl�t%NZ � ` :; '; .ON� �
,o Q r0� '. O a N'�.. .. �g m�, w.P t�:, _,� ., - �
� �,'�'� ': a a$:'���z.r.. f.�.--��g �y o-3
� � a c ��.q► ��sr.b'�.�.• �,�`:. "'_�.�
� O. �G'"'?::Q a•�, ?..� �.�p.? tn Q1" Q
m � ,. �y,w. ?, m ' ,p.�
$.��$.`� �<o:$��3. :. ..o: m'a,�,�� � � ��. _o � C - . i',
�. � �� �.° �� � '' c► �
,2� ��,Q'.�.,co ��° � ��' " �� �D� '��
� �. .;���:� �m �G3��#, � s �W • `
.._ .. •.�. ('�
. 4 � �Sj.� NO�� 7�7� `T� � '����'
� �?c.�;o ,_, .=5 � �,
�� �.S�;;a+����y :�: $��o..w� � � - ` , ` -
� f �^" O A �� �x��'•-��a
� .a�. ac�;?:�' — Q.g;, . y:'
Q �` $;�.��� `".
��: a o
. -,� ..... -
;��� :., . � . :Y-
1 �t'�,.::,.
i