HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.min.reg.04081985 , . ���.
F=���;
> - -
F� " '� r r.- c
� .�.����� '� ,.` '� I `+� P`�- � �i -��:-
h' i
� �..�. ����+° .a� �� 4 i�• � `
��
�. . . °CS'�•.. t '�r .3'.
... .. ��\.. . T..
.�.:.+. R. .��� . . . �. �. . _. - . . ..- .t�' ,
-
s
• gClAltb OC' C6liN'fY C�tI5520Fi�it5 AG�NbA
8 APRIL, 1985
9s00 a.m, �x�GUtiv� S�ggiun - Litigetion/��r�onnel - Nark Fulier,
Bnb 8raudi�
iiORK S�SSiON
10rOd Cdlar�clo Huuntain Coliege diseu�glon - RoBney Andecson/
; Gordon Snowbargec
,t� 10:30 MeBride Roed Vaeattan - Gery �s�ty. Aas'E County ALEorn@y
y
; 11:30 MeLain Plats Roed Design Alcernaciv@s - Bud 6yiar. �ublfc
; Worko Director/Banner Engin�ering
�
� ,' 12:00 Lunah Breek
F
� 1:30 p.m. @ublic Conn►ent
ADMINISTRJlTION
1�45 RBwluEtc�a and Contracta
Soction !S Grane Application - Mik� Slugockl. GranEs
AdminiatraEor '
£.
1985 Ambulanee Licenses - Don Davis. UndarshoriEf
`- r
, Firat Roadin
NaEworc Sarvlcas Con�racE - Do� Davis -
Fica��t R�aAi�ng
T98� Suf p�ntal Appropciat�ons - Lynn 9unlop, 8udgat A�alysE
2,00 Sacial Sarvicas - Mike Sahultz. Social Sarvices �irectoc
Ch id Suppore Bn�orcement Agr�emant
. LEAP Gontraet
Ragion XII Area Agancy on Aging
Child Arotectton Awareness we�k
. 2:30 Public Heeri�g - Haly Cross &as�ment - Gary Bsary
I.11[iD USB
2:35 WexnQr I,ot Split, Aetai�ed Submasgian 6 Fina] Plak - Cincly
H4uben. P2aan�n9
WOItK SSSSION
3:00 T��man Request; eeech Drive, Redstot►� - To�¢ Smith, County
AYtorney
_ 4s00 doint Heetins
Public Hearing - 1985 Ftousing Qualificatians & Guidelines -
� �im Adamski, Housing Director
'- Ruedi Refill Litigation - Hark Fuller
:;�--, -
'.5:� '
l: ' _
�st �._}
�.�_ zl
_r'._.F"�k':�7
.f,�
�Y-�_,"-":.,..�) .
*r•,••_
'/G�F,'j_���'�-j
'RS3F�r 'i. .
���
��`
'� ��'a+
'ia`'^�
.�*Y
-1
r -�1.
iit � �>> ,y�'-� r`SAi° y } �.,� .
�� s
�y ` t{ .� rk�.+It��'�i '����, ��x�# "�
.. �r:f.rF•4., __..._Fi���S�r_. .._...s...+a+sa�s� . " '�t.. �.e-e:,. G:.�q`�� .
�`*—'
PI21tIli COOPY'Y
80ARD OP OdltlIISSIOlfRRB
tt�cni.�►a MggTrNe 8 AORff �ons
PRB88NTt TRONi18 BLAKB� R08BRT N CBILD� qBLSN RLlWDBRt1D, G00RGB Ml1D86N�
MtCHABL KtN3L8Y
Holland Counry Cleck boratta 8anner introduced a p�lilion Ear the
llilis formation o� a� impcovement diatrict within tho Nolland Nills
Road Subdtvtsion. The casidanta of tha aubdivialon have pelitionod tor
Improva the Eormation oE a speciel distrfct apariticai2y to pcovlde
Diet for !he laprov�ant, to County standards, oE those coeda silualed
witbin tha aubjece subdiviaioe. The homeowne�a did not desi�e to
lncur an indebtedness to achieve ehe impcovem@etsr 1e vas
a�ticipated tAa! the tormalion o1 tbe district vould pcovide Eo�c
the collecGion, tbrough a�eeesAent, oF approximaeely ten tbouaand
dollaca (510,0001 annually. which funds would be oeod to linaece
a comprebensive, long te�m, 'pay-as-you-go' cnpitai impcovament
prograia toc the road systam. ean�er explaioed that tbe Board
muet sehedule a public beacing or► tha Formalion oE tht► pcopoeQd
, diatsict vithin the �ext lorty (!0) daysJ tAe speci�ic improve-
ments aad ehair cost, the adeguacy ot tbe Aetition and the
ability ot the dlstcicC to suppart a special aseessmertt, would be
reviewed during that time,
&iasley moved to set a public heariog on the formation oF
the Fitkfn County Aollaqd Hill$ General Imp[ovement Qietsict €os
Monday, b Nay, 2985, at 2:25 p.m. Madsen seconded a»d tbe a►otion
passed uoanimausly.
U!!TA Trnnxporkation Gsants Administratoc Nike Slugocki Sotcaduced
Section a reaolution concecning an u!!PA Section xighteen (18) Operatin9
16 Grant Por Pitkin County. Tt►e reso2ution would authorize the Cbair
- G[ant to execute and submit an application with the Colorado Departmenk
_ of aighvays for grant funds made available by the Orban Mass
- Tranaporkation Admi�isttation. The funds, which would be applied
; for by tbe Cuuoty as it vas tbe only grant eligible agency in the
°�=-5? - community, vould be utilized for the Roaring Fork Trattsit Agency.
The Agency anticipated a i986 operating deficit of seven hundred
- and nineteen thousand. six hundred and seventy-tive dollars
_ ($719,675) and administtative expenses of four hundred and
_ fif ty-seven thousand, seven hundced and ninety dollars ($457,790);
' pursuant to the Section 18 program, fifty percent (508) of an
t '' operatinq deficit and eighty petcent (80$) of administrat3ve
�._ ..
=�:,::,;;� expenses were eligible for federal funds. The grant application
"�A:,•::- would request funds in the amount of seven hundred and twenty-six
��'�'��':? thousand, sisty-nine dollars ($726,069). Slugocki considered it
��.:_ �':
� x,��}-";; Commissioner's Meeting 8 April, 1985 - 1
���,
�,.
. .,:� _-.. .� ::.� _,,... __�. _ . .
vecy unlikely that the County would receive all of the funds
r�quested; although the County was eligible to receive this
amount, it was anticipated that an award of approxfmately fifty
thonsand dollars (550,000) would be made. Authorization for the
snbmission of the grant applicatfon would be ceviewed by the
Roarinq Pork Tcansit Agency board of directors tomorrow evening.
Child expressed some concern that the Aqency anticipated a
deficit during the year 1986. Slugocki explain�d that the defici.t
t+as calculated in the abaence of any funding from Che City of Aspen
ot the Coun[y= the only tevenues id�ntified for the purposes of
the gcant application were those de�ived from the Agpen Skiing
Company and bus fares. Slugocki explainpd Chmt wharever funda wecp
saved as a resul[ oE the gcant aNard would be u�ilized foc the
Agency's capital project Eund. He a2so nuCed that, in rhe event
rhe grant award was made, eax rev�nueg or eome othet commitment
would bp necessaty to ptovide the Eifty per�ent (50t1 Iocal
mat�h.
Chi2d alsa qvestioned the amaant of fund� designeted Eor
adminietrutive expensest the Eour hundred and fiEty-geven thoueand
dollar (5�57,0�0) cost EiqucQ was conBideced somawhat axcessive
given the size of the Ageney. Slugocki explained that the adminia-
trative expenaea incurred by the Agency included all atafE
sa2erles, malntenence, lnaurence, office supply and leqal expenses,
and others. Ne noted lhat the rosolution was submitted Eor Board
review today as the gcent appllcation muat be EEled by 15 April.
Kinsley moved eo appcovo thee rosolution subject to the
approval of the Roecing Pork Tce�sit Aqancy boacd oE dicectors.
Madaen aeconded ond the motion pass@d wleh oppositilon lrom Chiid,
who auggeseed thae the eoacd de�er action pendinq ravinw by the
Roacing Pork Tranaie Agency boacd o! di�ectora.
1965 UedersheriEt Don oavis inttoduced tbe 1985 ambulance 1lcenses
11mbu- Eor tbe Aepeo llmbulance Distrtce. Basal! and Rural Pice Pcolection
lance Dtstcict. Mountatn Ambulence Servlce, ��c. aod the Snowmass-wildcat
i.tcense Fice Proteclion Districr. The Board revieved a�d lssued permits
Eor the opecation of all ambulances opecaEtng in tha Counly o� an
aunual bnsis upon the recommendalion o! !Me EtiS eubcommittae o[
the Aublic Safaty Counail. Davis, vha vaa cepresenting the
Counail in this fnstance, expla3�ed that a kotal o[ eleve� (11)
vebicles wace it►spected foc coropliance wi:h applicable cequiraments
this yearj all vehicles we�a tound to comply wiCh applicable
etatutory requiremanCs excepk for tha faur (4) vehiclea opecated
by Mountain Ambulanea Servica, Inc„ whicb cequested a vaiver
from the requisement tbat eacb vebicle be egulpped witb an
arthopedic scoop type strekcher. Tbe vaiver was requested as tbe
Secvice generelly tcansported pakients from Aspen Valley Hoapital
to the airport oc other hospitalsj as tbe patients have already been
hospitalized and stabilized, the stcetcher was not considered
necessary, pavis explained that the Council has historically
ag�eed to the waivec because of these circumstaneess the lioapikal
ceviewed the transportation of each patient on a case-by-case
basis, and determined whether the transporting vehicle was
suffiCiently equipped prior to discharging a patient. Davis
[ecommended that the waiver be granted for the 1985 licensing
year given the type of operation genera2ly enqaqed in by the
Service; the license should be limited, however. to tbe transpor-
. tation of non-critical patients except in bona fide emergencies. The
Board shou2d review next year, as a mattet of policy, whether the
- County desired to license ambulances that were only partially
equipped.
- Klanderud noted that the ambulance licensing standards were
established by the Public Safety Council and it was felt that
_ those standards should be applied to all operators on a aniform
�' � "• basis. Davis explained that the historic response profile of the
�` `� Commissionec's Meeting S April, 1985 - 2
, - �;
.,*��K.
�r.!.`4 a;�_'
a" -..^-€�e
� .,�,�,-
z f >� �f `�
.. '�1�. � 4 . �� �� ( �i ,..`'i�` �
. ' ��..� � �`� .��`' 1 I (�
{ 4 }
-'� � . � _ -. .....�.,An..��N�. . . , .., �w�..,. ,nv-r+.pa:�..t.__.�..�i"'a'�it4�e,_� t� x .
5ervice indicated that ambulance transportatfon was generally
limited to post-hospitaiization patienes, and on this basis the
waiver has historfcally been gcanted.
Child expressed some concecn that the licensi.ng of atnbulances
operat�d by Mountain Ambolance that did r.oC comply aith thp
equi,pya�nt standacds establtshed for such vehfcles nay resu2t in
increased Iiability for the County, oavis explained that the
1985 license, if gcanted Nith thp waiver, should be ronditione8
!o rhe tranaportation of non-critiCal patients except in bona
flde em�rqencie�, The issuance of thp licenae, a� conditioned,
ghou3d not resul= io �ny fncreas�d County liability. Davig noted
that the license would only be va2id through thls year, and he
agreed tn ceview and tesolve the licensing of partially equfppe@
vehirles prioc ta ehe end vf the year.
Kinsley mnved to granr the 1985 ambulance licenses Eor the
e2even (21) vehicles operated by the Eour (�) egencies identiEied
above, and to grant a watver from the orthopedic scoop type
seretcher cequirement to ltountetn Ambulencs Secvice. tnc., ali as
cerommended by ehe public Safety Couneil, subject eo ehe fol2owing
conditions
1. Tbe 1985 ambulence liconee iaeued to Mountain 1�mbulance
Service, inc, aha21 be ila�ited to ths tranaportation oE
non-crirlcai patients axcept in bona Ftdo enaecqencles
Nadean eeconded or►d the motlon paaecd unanimousiy.
iST Don Davis lotroduced oe ftrat rea@!ag a ceao2utlon approvin
Read: and adopting a cont�act to purchaae a telephoee system and
Netvock equipment from Network Secvlces. Ltd. The cesolutton wou2J
Services authoriae tbe purchase o[ additional telephorte equipaent from
Contraet NetMOrk 8ervicos to serve �he Airport, Road and 8cidge papartment.
comanuniky centec, the Connty ottices located in the Courthouse
plaza buildtng and tha law e�toccement oftfces to be located in
the basemcr►t oF the Courthousa, A naw, integcated, cost alFectiva
and state oF the art talapho�a system was purchaeed from the sama
vendor in 1982 for the Courthouse and the neti+ jail� tha reso�ution
submitted for 8oard reviav today would authorize tha axtension
and upqrading of that system ta include all County departmenks
not originally servtced. The addttional equip�ent, vhich would
result in a cost oE appcoximately seventy-nine thousand dolla�a
IS79,000), was not bid upop as it was conside[ed the second and
final pha$e a£ the origint►1 Network Se�vices contract authorized
in 1982. The aoard should decide, prior to fiaal ceading, whether
the additional equipment vould be purcbased outright by the
Cou�ty or vhether it wauld be obtained pursuanL to a lease-pucchase
agreement, Davis recommended approval of the cesolution as
submitted.
Rlanderud questioned whether sufficient funds were budgeted
. for the pucchase of the additional telepbone eguipment. County
� Manager John eldert explained that the equipment could be purchased
outright vith sucplus funds ociginally budgeted for Mouotain eell
sesvices last year; there aere sufficient funds available in the
year-end fund balance to pucchase the system such so that its
aoquisition need not be financed. The specific method of financing
" would be addressed during a work session prior to final reading.
- Eldert noted that the purchase represented a planned phase-in of
- - the second and final stage of the installation of telephone
"_ services foc County offices, The City of Aspen would contribute
:x -, suffic3ent f unds towards the purchase, based on the City's direct
�'=` �r-' share of the cost to service the Aspen Police Department.
- �s-:-
.�•.'.:.,::
`�=' --= < Child suggested that the purchase of equipment for both the
_......:�.:.
'•t;n-�..X.= airport and the Road and Btidge Department may, perhaps, be
,=��.�,s�? premature as both agencies may be relocated. Eldert explained
-,�f,�A,
��= Commissioner's Meeting 6 April, 1985 - 3
���
. .
.,�,.
..:C. : . .j .
.._ :-Z � ti �� :. ;j _ . .
- _ T � eTM� �`1 \.hY'i' .�~i� � '
. ,. . F � 3ia�� _ �rt �t.�s r.. .
.. - . . .�... ...-. :T+x�:.`��4±�+:�+.. , rsKS.�d+r�.4..•ur�. n.. �_.t . .
Lhat the CounYy srould oxn the system upon its pnrchase, and that
a12 equipment cou2d be moved in the event of relocation.
Madsen noted that ihe system to be installed in the community
centec would also serve the Aspen Mental Health Clirtic, and he
asked if the Clinic would contcibute towacds the cost. Uavis
explai�ed that tbe Clinic has not yet agreed to the new systea,
such so that equipmpnt aill not b� installed to serve that
agency. in the event the Clinic desiced to pacticipate in the
�ystem, the Clinic aould be requir�d to pay its shace of the cost
and eith�c puccha�se the QquiExnent or rent it from thp County. bavis
noted eh�t Community Heaith secvices� anothpr age»cy located in
tbe comnunity cenCer, has eppcopctatpd suffielent furtds to
purChase thp equi�neni this yeac.
Madsen moved to approve the resolution on fir�t reading,
Klanderud seconded and the motton pagaed unanimousiy.
18T Sudget A»alyat Lynn Dunlop iotroduced on ficst rQadinq a
Read: suppiemental budget appropriation ceaolution Eoc the year 1484. The
198� c@$olution repreaented the finel appropciattone Eor the year
Supp 199�, antl [ncludod the followtrtg: unanticipaced expanditures oE
Approp chcee bundced ond eevenry-oee Ehouoand, eight hundced and aevetnty-
tvo dollaca (5371,872), Sncluding cen thousand. �even hundrod
do]lars �S10,]00) in additional traiis mai�E@nance, Eouc thousand.
atx hundrod and Eorty doilars IS�,640) in additionol eiectronica
parES Eor the tranolator system, nlnoty-eix thouoand, two hundced
and Eocty-Eive dollars (546,215) in oddltionai Eunda for variouo
Road and Elcidgo capieol projecta, additional available rovenuos
oE !vo hundred and E1Etiy-nine thousand, !vo hundred and tAirty-Eouc
dollars 15259,274) , including A live thou�aod dolla� �SS,OQO)
human aervlces contribution from tha Ae�n Poundation, thirteen
thousa�d, nina bundred ancl Elfteen dollars tS13,9I5� in greate�
than p�ojected cevanue Erom the Cle�k and Roeorde�, thirty-tva
thousand do2lars t�32•OOQ) in greater than p�aiected i�terest
eac�ings, thicty-nioe tdousand dollacs 15�9,060) in 9ceater tha�
projeceed Road a�d Britige ceveauas, addltiona2 airpock revenues
of eighty-one tbousar�d, five huadred do23acs tS81,5001, Eour
bundrsd and ei9bty-fiva thousand, one hundrad and ttEty-eight
du2lars ($185,15s) in Eunds no longer neoded, and otbere. Dunlop
axplai�ed that a wosk sesaion Aas bean scheduled !or naxt �eek Co
review the individua2 appropriations in gceatec detail.
Blake moved first ceading appcoval o� the sesolution, Child
aecanded and tbe motio� passed una�imously.
Social Social Servires pirector Mike Schultz introduced a joint
Setvices petition to Governor Lamm, to be submitted by the eoard, the
Nocth West Colorado Council of Governments Board oF pi�ectors artd
the Skyline Six Area Agency on Ag1ng Regional Advisory Council.
Tbe petition vould reque�t that the Governor intervene against an
' effort to consolidate the various Agencies into largec o�ganiza-
tione, one of vhich would consolidate almost the entice Weskern
Slope into a single agency, in an effort to achieve �st savings.
Schultz explained that he has contacted the 5tate nepartment of
" Social Se�vices, the proponent of the consolidation, in an effoct
to ascertain the basis for the effoct; the Department has not yet
_ responded such so that the basis was not known at this time.
- Skyline Six Regional Advisory Council Chairman Budge Bingham
- explained that the State Department of Social Services received
�'��� £ederal funds for health and human services for distribution to
- fifteen (15) Area Agencies on Aging throughout the state. A
�- proposal was recently submitted to provide fif ty-two percent
3 : z (528) of all fedecal funds to the Denver area as an identical
r=.=:`- percentaqe of the Agencies were located on the East Slope, in an
Commissioner's Meeting 8 Apcil, 1985 - 4
, . � ' •-�.±:
.. a'i• . +�' . f,_ ; �y ,.`�f� �i 1 �.:•�1 . . ' .
. - - - �l g � � Y
<
. .
, . �
.
' . _Ii Z �. '� ,'y�7A i�1�T�>.� "f"-
.. -�� ' - .. . - .. , i . . . 1 . � .. . - � - . " � .
�ffott to achieve thfs goal, ft was ptoposed that the numbet of
Agencies be reduced in an effoct to reduce administcative coats:
the proposal would gcoup Pitkin County, curtent2y a member oF
R�gion XII consisting of five (5) counties. with sixteen (16)
other counties all located on th� Westecn Slope, eingham oppoged
the consoiiaatton effort as it was not felt that administrative
eostg would be rpduced aa a result; the new, cwneolidated di�trict
would be extcemely lacge and extensfve trave2 wou2d be cequired. in
addltion, the various Councila would lose thp moc� petgdnal and
inrimate ce,ntact vith acea pecsnnnel that cuttently exists. Binqhane
nc�ted that tbe petition hag already been executed by the NMICCOG
8oard of bircctars and the Negion XII Advisory Council. and he
cequested tha� the buard gimilarly lend itg �nderaement.
5chuit�c natpd chat the varioas Area Agenrieg on Ag1ng were
very diverse in meetinq Chg needs of their respertive rlient�. Thg
consolidation efEort vould result in a �inqle. unfform standard
' for the entlre Wescetn Slope, an effnre whieh wao ronoidersd
, neithet prareical nor appropciate.
Kinsley aaved to endorse Me peCition in support oE main�alning
tha Skyline Stx Arca Agancy on Aqlnq, Madaen aecondod and the
aotion paeasd unanimously.
ScAules then inccoducod a Memorandum oE tln8ecstanding �o bs
antoc@d lnro betweeo thQ Ooacd ond tho Diatciet Attocney'a
OEltce. The Mamorondum provldea for the coopccatloo of the OfEics
wlth roa�ct to child support anEorcomtnt, snd delloea ehe taeko
of the OEEicer and Ehe Soaiai Sarvices Dapnre�enL !n thia regard. Tha
Mamorandum submitt@d for poacd revlew today vos identical to
those aubmitted duri�g rha pnet tvo yeats, and Schulta recoamended
approval.
Madsen maved to approvo the Memorandum, Cbild aeconded a�d
tho motio� paBSed u�a�lmoualy.
&chultx Bubmitted a bov-inco�ne 6necgy Aas3sta�ce (LEAP) Progtam
Ve�dor 1lgreeme�t to bo entered into betveen the Boarci and tha
Rocky Mountai� Natural Gas Company. Inc. Tha Agraement would
authocize the Departme�t ot Soctal Secvices ta �emit funds
� directly to the utllity eom�wny, on behalf at clients, raeher
than to the clients themselvas. The i.EAP program was Punded vlth
todecal funds, and was intanded to provide ase3atanca to low-ineome
Eamilies in the pu�chase of electrical, ail and gas services.
ScAulta explai�ed that there were tventy-one (21) eliqible
clients in tbe cona�unity at tbis time, all of whom 9eouinely
needed such assistancet p�ospective cliants must meet stringent
eligibility requiremeats, and the program was 9eaerally targeked
tovards senior citizens,
Madsen moved to autborize tbe Chair to execute the Agceement.
Cbild seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
Schultz introduced a resolution in support of Pitkin County
Child protection Avareness week. The resolutfan would designate
the veek of 14 through 20 April as Child P�otection Awareness
- veek, the sixth such designation in the County. The designation
` vas intended to promote avareness of child abuse/neglect and to
acknowledge the efforts of the child protection awareness team.
Social services officer Rate Jangula explained that the team
-- - would sponsor a variety of programs during the subject week in
- - conjunction with a number of organizations in the community,
}•'_:-
including the Department, the school system, and othecs.
Madaen moved to appcove the cesolution, Rlanderud seconded
=�;-..�_ = and the motion passed nnanimously.
� :�.- ----------
�..-'T-
s��.�
JY ' Commissioner's Meeting 8 April, 1985 - 5
.x..=:...�:`�
=' �
:-},,:
ri:�. ::. .. .: S.�.yw,�si.'.� yz +r�;;ye ...r.� .rc �
3: . - � .�. .. _ ::.
_...,,, '' ..a+ewa�w'�,�_ .,. .:.<,a:a+u :..... s�:�i�e.:tiX��u�"._`'�`.�a•.s�`....�� .i�c:�r...._:"` .
Public The Baard coevenec� a public hearing to considec on secoad
Hearing: reading a resolution granting to the Ho2y Cross Electric Association
goly Inc. an underground easement for electric por+er lines and pquipnent
Ccoas servicing the Pitkin County Bus Maintenance Pacility. The resu2ution
Sase- woald provtde the Assaciation with an easement for the use of
ment property upon whfch an undecground pover line serving the Bus
[iaintenance Pacility has alceady been installed. Esary explained
that the resolution has been rQViewed by the I+ublic Wocks pirector
and Project �ngineer Spero Niachos, both of whom recommpnded
appraval,
�ilake then opened th� hearing for publlc comments there
being nooe, �he h�aring r►as ciosed.
Madsen moved to approv� the rea�lution on second and final
reading, Itinsley se�nnded and th� motinn pasged un�nimously.
Hexner Plennec Cindy Houben i»troduaed th@ Nexner lot split a pplt-
Got cation Ear d�tailed submiegion end final plat revlev. The applicant
Spitt: has proposed o twn (2) lot subdivfgion on a gixty-five (65) acre
Delall parcei of land eituat�d tn �h@ AP-i zone district on Red Nountain.
Subwssn Th�a appiication, aubmitted und�r tbe Eifty psrcent Z50t) denslky
csductlon provision oE the CodQ, would cceatQ tNO (2) aspacate
parcaln of appcoxLmatety thlrty-two (]2) acrea Qach.
Thee genQral eubmisulon waa appcoved i� Pebrua:y oE thls
ycar sub�8ct to seva» C7I condietons of cacord, all o! wh�eb have
brten eat sfio�. ReEacral eommenta Eor the detailod submiaaion end
Einal plat eevioy worc gernQrally aupportiva= th@ Bnvieonmantal
iienith OQ�artrac�t aupported tho appiicant's proposal to connoct
to thQ Aapon Consol idated 5�nitation Diae[ict aawer linst, tbe .
Asal,slant County Sngt�eec cevievvd and approved the drtvawey
aecosa pia�e, aad the Saoitation District has aqreed to ae�vfca
the subjece pcop�rey vitb an out aE dtstrict agce�nent.
Tba Pianning Aod Zaninq Commis�ian revfewed the appllcation
at its regula� �aQeling on 19 March, and recomme�ded aPp�oval
suDject to the tolloving Lour t41 conditionas
1. as a ca�diCian ot EhiQ subdivision Approval, tbe antire
pac�al �ball bo dead resEricted against any further
developmcnt. Thla deed ceet[iction st�all ba revlewed
and approved by the Couaty Attorney prior to appcoval
of the final p2ot
2. khe issuance of building pesa►its sha21 be subject to
demonstration of compliance with all recommendatians
made by Nick bamPiris i� bis lettes of Septembec 6, 1984
3. tbe applicant shall submit a Bigned service a9ceement
vith the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation nistrict prio�
to recordation of the iina� plat
4. eithec of the two (2) access entrance altecnatives as
shown on the detailed p2at is acceptable. aovever, at
such time as the upper acce&s is obtaiaed, the lower
access drive shall be restared to meadorr 2ands
' $onben explained that the applicant was in the process of neqotia-
ting with the Red tiouotain Homeowner's Association for an access
easement; the nse of this easement would provide far the nse of
the upper access drive, a pceferable alignment due to reduced
- visibility, The detailed plat nonetheless reflected an alternative
access in the event the Association did not grant the necessary
� easement; whichever of the two (2) entrance alternatives was not
" � utilized would be restored to meadow lands. 8ouben noted t4at the
-;�--:;� • third condition of approval as recommended by the Commission
"s"`"`- ' sbould be revised to indicate that the District in lieu of a
�;.-;r-_�� ,
,��== r. Commissioner's Meeting 8 April, 1985 - 6
Ty��
`''�w,^�i�,3�!`.7
,�:r.`;t., �Y„�-:
w����,�.�n�.
. ,��:
x.:F'�` : �"�`�. � �` �;�-� .
��
� �`-;c t��; � '._� + ._f -�� ���4`:,r� ; ,�Vl"�4 � � . .
jn�a ...> �sr�►e� � �� ��`�...
. --'.. >�,Sr;..w,+a.�..�.,.�.r ,,.�. . ..F.:iJ+r�i+/-...+aw+Ak ,..
sprvice agreement, would provide a letter of commitment vith �
respect to sewage dfsposal.
Gideon Raufman, an attorney representing the appliaant,
explained that the applicant desired to utilfae tt�e upper access
and desired to obtain the necessacy easement from the Assocfation.
The HomeoWner'g Asgociatfnn cancelied the last meeting Nith the
applicant, such so that che igsue has not ypt been ceaolved.
Kinsley movpd to qrant detai2ed suba�igsion and final plat
approvai subject tn ehe four (4� conditiana of the Planning and
8oning Coa►misgion ag cecited above and as amended beiowr
3. the applicane gh�ll 8ubmit an executed letter of
enmmitment wfCh the Aspen Consolidaled Sanftation
DisCtict prior to recocdatlon of the final plat
Cbild secon8ed and Che motion pasaed unanimously.
The jotnt Cily Council - eoar8 of County Coaioissionere
mee!!ng was conve�ed. Thoae present inctuded Councilaewbers 8l11
Stirling, Ai Blo�aqulcl, Chaciotte Nalla and Dlck Rnecht, and
Board membera Blake. Rlanderud, Madeee and Rinalay.
Ruod! ¢nvironmental Coocdlnator Mock Puller lntroduced discussion
Retlll on 1!tlgaeion, lnitiatod by tb� Colorado Rtvec Mater Conaervancy
Llti- Diatrict, concerning reEtll rights for Ruedi RQSacvoic. Th� Ctty
gatian and tha Coue!y mad• application several yenra aqo for the watar
cights to cerElll the Reaervoir beyond !ts inieial capacityi this
applieation was opposed by the District, wbo aubseguently aiade
application for tha same cights. The �eEill rights were litigaled
by the pacties and !he application aub�aittad try tha Cily and !he
Couaby wa� attira�ad by tho Supreme Court Iate lasr year. Pullac
oxplaiRed that sLatE bas been negotiatirtg vtth tbe Diatrict nnd
he requested eonceptual approval ot the settleaent �ropoaed ae
- Follows:
1. the Dtstrict vould cacognize tbat recceatlonal aclivtties
in tbe Reservoir constituted a baneticia2 use ot the
Reservoir, euch so tbat rec�eatio�al act3vities would
be consldered an equally appcop�iate usa of the facility
as water sa2es aod other uses -
2. tbe City and the County wou2d acknowledge bhat tbe
Distsict was tbe bolder of water rigi►ts in tbe Reservofc,
including those necessa�y Ear water sales, and tAat the
piatrict vas responsible for alaQCating those rights
betr►een a12 beneficial uses, i�cluding [ecceational
activities
3, the Dist�ict �ould allow both the City and the County,
• as owners and apecatocs of the hydroel�ctrfc facility
in tbe Reservoir, ta ukilize the Ruedi vater cights for
= the purposes of hydroelectr3c power genecation
4, the City and the County would not oppose wate= sale
' contcacts from the Bureau of Reclamation to the District
The settlement, once approved by all parties, would be finalized
__ by stipulation and letter of agreement. Music and Cope, water
:_r�;�:��:_ counsel for both the City and the County, has indicated that the
•;�=.:"; :' settlement pLOposed would protect the interests of the District
.�;;_�;�.,;;� and acknowledge those of the City and the County. The board of
��^.:, directors for the District would ceview the settlement praposal
�-,��:. next week, and, if approved, it was anticipated that a formal
�,�w:x agreement would be available for exewtion within the neYt two
����; � 8 A ril, 1985 - 7
Commissioner s Meeting P
,�
. ,�,.
.�1^�'� f Y - .
• ' '... r-.;.,+..... �t,,. -+.�..��ar�. .�' �_.+t..-.�._ £ r Y`��+�M.�'C•�..,R��.���'� .. ,
(2? rreeks. Fuller explained thak the Boacd conceptually endorged
the settlement during executive session this morning, �uch so
that Counefl endorsement Was tequired at this time.
Fialla moved to conceptually endocse the sett2ement proposal
as outlined above and to authorize Puller to continue negotfationa
kith the District. Knecht seconded and the motion, whfch wbs
lia►ited ta Council, passed unanimously,
Public The eoaccl ednvened a pubiic h�aring to ronsider on seeond
Nea�ring: and Eina1 reading a resolution approving and adopting 1985
1985 employee houging guidelineg and r�ntal snbsidized housing tsenior
Employee citizen) guide2ines, both ag rerommendpd by the Aapen/Pitkin
Nouging Connty Nouuing Authoriry, and acceptfng the 198� annual reporr on
Guide huuaing. Houging Directoc Jim ndamski lntroduCed the resolution,
wt►irb MOU]C� E6tIF.d�ly adopt ehe quelifirationg and gui@ellnea for
all cmployee housing reguicemtnts thcough Apcil oE 1986. Th�
Authority eiso prepared an annual ceport on employ ee housing,
ideatifytny those projrcta administered by the Authorlty, sales
and csaeies of various u�its, the Code administrativ� functiona
perforned by tl�e Auehocity, and othecs.
B�ake tAnn opened tRe heering Eor pubiic commene.
Klandsrnd QxpreaaQd aome concocn with the equare Loo! roetai
pcice guidelinos p�oposad Eor adoptlont 1t was indiceted. foc
lnstaoce, that omployoe roatrlcEQd uete cantnl rates may be
inereaaed by thcao a�d thcee tanths percen� (3.3t) ae o! � Aprll
of �bis year. �►damskt expl8ined that the guidelines ostabllehed
For employeQ roatricted rental unita ello�+ed foc a maxtaaum rental
increase of throQ and thrae lenths percent (3.3�) thia year. TAis
Eigure repceseoled the roaximum allovable increaee i� employee
�ental unitsr ia�dlocds a►ay opt not to increase rental cates at
all �his year� o� may pravide for a �rcentage i�crease up to
lAis limit.
elomquiet questioned kbe need Eo� seasonal employee houel�g
and the man�ar in which the AutAority addressed this ieaue. flousing
Authortty boacd a�ember Jim Curtls oxplained tAat the ,►�cno�ity
recently packicipated ia the adopCtan aF a Code amendment that
provided for do�mito�y housingt tbis pncticulac amendmeat, wh3ch
wae adoptad by the eaard in conjunction vith tbe Bighla�ds I►tn
project, vas intended to address tbe need £or seasonal employee
Aousing. Cuctis explaiaed that the Ce�kennial Proiect, including �j
both the rental a�d sale units, �epresented an immediate reaponse
to the employee housing market a$ vell as the need fos seasonal
bousingr tbe sale upits wou2d address the need for seasonal
housin9 hy psoviding an owne�ship opportu�ity to existiog rentecs.
Aspen Times editor Bil nunaway asked if tbe 9uide2ines
psovided for the purchase of etnployee units by employers. Adaa�ski
explained that certain units cauld be purchased by employecs,
foc occupancy by employees, subject to certain conditions. F�ployer
purcbases wece accorded the last priority, howevers 3n the event
an employee unit was not sold within sixty (60) days from the
- origina2 listing, an employer purcbase could then be considered,
Adamski explained that employer purchases Were generally not
. encouraged as it was felt that �p2oyee units sbould be owner
occupied cathe� than rented by an employer to an employee; oxner
occupied units would geneLally provide a mote cohesive neighborhood
and owners generally cared for their units better than tenants.
Rlanderud noted that, historically, the County has generally
�... adopted employee housing guidelines that give employer putchases
- . the last priority, The prioriky system was intended to provide
:,�=�;. employees with an opportunity to obta3n some equity in the
`�"-°`-'" � communiky by purchasing their units.
"- �,+:
��t1
.,,�'; . Commissioner's Meeting 8 Aps31, 1985 - S
�;��::;;t::
-��*:�'+z:
. ,7,±:
�""��, `° j ' ,
� ;:.
? . -�` . `.����1��:�:`���~` x#,�.-_t-` `'��'
... .., ... .. ...�. ..nsi�i Y.-a4..:,. _ ;/kck+M.-+•-. .a.i.. .-'n'�'...�:--a.n1.., . .
Bibmquist expressed some coacern that tbe priority system
aouid deprive small businesses of assisting in the ceso2ution oE
the employee honsing shottage in the community.
Housinq Office manager Ann 8onman explained that there Mere
various methods hy ahfch sniall businesses could pacticipate in
the cesolution of the employee housinq ahortage; employecs could
assist thefr employees, for instance, by co-signing for a mortqage.
5he alsu noted that there wece ten (lU) employec owned unitg in
the Huntpr Creek Condominium cnmplex.
Stirlinq asked if employee owned units could be rented in
the evcnt the ownec moved out of town. AdamBki expl�ined that tt�e
ownet of an empioyee an}t could rent the unit foc a maxfmu� a�
one (1) yeac and only subgect ro cettain eondirfon�t an �playee
unit ONITOt may receive a leave of absence, for inatance, foc
0t1UC�C�OtiHI purpose�, and under thene circumgtanceu the unit
cnuld be cented. The r,wner oE en employee unit �hn pecmanent2y
r�iocated muBt aell ehe unit, howevec, es all testrirted unita
v+ere limitrd to owner occupancy.
Itlanderud rtoted that there vece e number oE mnployee unita
ava:�ab2e foc purrhash at lhis timej thace was no backlog, for
instance, of empIoyee unira such eo rhat thsce were a nua�ber of
employee units evailsble Ear e�aployor purrhese.
Stiriing quastioned thQ mannQC in whiah tt+e Nousing Autbocity
p:omoiod dormftory housing Eoc seasonal housing. Adamskt oxplaiaed
that the dormltory CodQ amendment was adopled by both the Ctty
and the County laet year. Tbe Authorily vould i�dicate, during
pre-appifration conEareneea, tha! dormttocy houetng waa tbe
proEeiced type of c�aployce houaing to De provided tt►ia year, such
8o tbat developmont �ceposala that oFforad thie type of t►ousfng
would likely recolva highar scores in the amployoe housir►g
eategory. Adamski notecl tbat tdere vece a r�uaeber ot oxisting
pra�ecte that pravided dorm!lary bousi�g a! thia Cima, lncludiag
Rotbie'B Rastaucant, the Holtday InR a�d !he Nighlands Inn. And
that the Aspan Nounlain Lodge �roject wouId sta►ila�ly Provlde
such houetrtg upan it� campletion.
6landerud asked it the Authority had any inEocmation on the
use o€ exisU ng do�mitory unitst it vas understood. tor instance,
that tha darmlCory units provided by Rutb3e'a vera not utilixed by
employees, if docmitacy housing was �ot considared desicable by
employees, it was not knox� vhether this typa of housing shoWd
be encouraged. Adamrki explafned that tba Rutbie's housing units
were occupied by aa few as one t13 employee last winter; kbe use
of the Rutbie's facility was nat ca�sideced representative af
doxmitory bousin9 in general, however, as the facility vas
situaked o� Aepen Mountain and was nat easily acceseible.
Xlanderud noted that the resolution indicated that the
guidelioes could be aweoded by majosity vote of the t�ousing
Authorfty= as the aonual gufdelines were approved by the 8oard
a�d Council, it was not known vt►y amendments could be app[oved
by tbe Aukhocity. Adamski explained that the Authocity board of
disectore would review and approve all amendments to the gu3delines,
after vhich eoard and Council approva2 would be required.
' Stirling noted that the land-in-lieu provision indicated
that land thus aoquire8 would be conveyed to the County; it was
not known, for instance, why the County was the only designated
recipient of such lands, Adamski explained that the City has not
yet adopted a land-in-Iieu or payment-in-2ieu provision, such so
that this pa[ticular method was only applicable to Caunty projects.
- The City Planning and Zoning Commission denied thfs particular
� Code amendment and it was never submitted to Council for review.
-- The amendmeat was denied as there was no identiPied project or
-- _-- property that the provision vould have been used for, and there
was some concern with the time delay that would occur in the
�.�3`
-- Commissioner's Meeting 8 April, I985 - 9
.�;; �:�
• `:�1:
. � "6��` t '-i r�y* Y ."_ r.,;,', .
:t'3 - :S.. it �' f 4 e '-� sL { . -
. ♦ r. ..i�i��'�F'Sf�W.�'. ._. . ....: ... .-.. _�'�w_.��.r�j'w:Sa`.��R��������i4+�7'+►�'rtY"i����. ...
event it aas uspd; the payment or conveyance of Iand, foc instance,
would Yikely not occuL until tWO t2) oc three (3) y�ars subsequent
to approval.
Stirling expressed some eoncern t6at the payment/cash-in-lieu
provision r►as not revie�+ed by Council; a11 Cod� ameadments reviewed
by the City Comrnfssion, even if denied, should be focwarded to
Council Mfth a recommendation. Stirlinq instructed Cfty Manager
Na2 5rAi21ing to teview rnis �rticulac Code amendt�ent and advise
Council eccordingly.
Blomquist reguegted a� etaff analyais on the prohibition
againat the rentei of employee ownptship uniCS.
Blak� asked for additional �ommentsJ thpre being none, the
hegring was closed.
Madgen moved to approve Che resolutiort an secoad and final
ceading, Klanderud seconded and th¢ motion passed unanlmouely.
Counril eqreed to review, on a@cond ceadinq, an ordinance
adopting the eubject guidelinea latQC thia cwening.
Sonior Blomqulut quealioned the status of aenior housing In the
Bousinq com�aun!!y center. eldect cxplained that the grant application
submltlsd Eor the purchaae oE ebe community c@ntac buildinq
lndicated that the [acility would be pucchased !or a number oE
diEloreot usQS, m1I of which were tarqQLed by peccentogei lt was
1nAlcatod, tor lnaernco, lhot fiEty-aeven parc@nt (57t) oE !he
buildtng zould b� uaecl tar senior housing. 7'he percenlaqee ,
identilied in !ha grnnt ap�lica!!o� wer� not, however, bindieg.
6ldert explained that sta[[ wae attmnpting to deceeeralise the
variaus aenior pcoytams, su�b so that every City and Counly
program r+auld have a aenior coa�pon��t. tic notecl that the eoa�uoity
c@ater was, at tbis ti�ne, entirely in bAlance vith the fnte�t at
the grant apPlieatian.
Ada�ewki exp2ait►cd that the Houeing Authori�y oriyinally
rey ueated tbat the City and the County suppoct !he jol�t tlousing
Ottiae Por the year 19s4 by each apprapriating thfrty-six tbousand,
one hundccd and seventy-three dalla�e (53b,1731, a suw whicb
rauld have included sutficient f unds to establiah a subsidizad
seaior housing Fund. Tbis request was subsequently reduced to
twanty-aight thousand, four hundrad and ninety dollara tS28,�9Q)
Fcom each eotity, and these Lunds wer� apprapriated accardingly.
Adamski explai�ed tbat the 1984 budget foc Che Authoclty was not
fully utilized, and that tbere vas a surplus of approx3mately
eigAt thousa�d, eigbt hundced dallars ($8,800); only tr►enty-touc
thousand dollacs (524,000) Was needed fcom eacb eotity, reaulting
in a surplus of approximately four tbousand, fout hundted dollars
(S4,400) for both govecnments. Surplus fu�ds were generally
returned to each entity, such so that both the Gity and the
County vould teceive a rebate of approximately four thousand,
four hundred dollars ($4,4001 . Adamskf requested, however, in
lieu of the rebates, that the 6oard and Coupcil authorize the
�eapprop�iation of the surplus funds foc the purpose of establishing
a fund to subsfdize senior bousing.
Stirling moved Eo authorize tbe reappropriation of fouc
thousand, fouc hundred dollars (54.400) in surplus 1984 Housing
Authority funds for the pucpose of establishing a seniar housing
reserve fund. Walls seconded and the motion passed with opposition
from Rnecht.
-- Rinsley moved to authorize the reappropciation of four
- thousand, four hundred dollars (54,400) in surplus 1984 Housin9
Authority funds for the purpose of establishing a senior housing
� reserve fund. Rlanderud seconded and the motion failed with
,e.;'w �' Commissioner's Meeting 8 Apcil, 1985 - 10
:-«:.
�=�R�
�`_�
.•;�.�,; ' �5-
�
�ti�
��
�"����� � � h �'� �,�
� ��. � _
a:.�.:_�
opposltion from B��k� and t�ad�en rrho, although anppoztive of the
cnncept, t�p$�IeB t0 rpvic�r trie County's year-e�d figcal poeition
ptior tn appropriating aey �urplus tunds.
The Board gpnecaily agreed to caneid�t t8� anthari�ation
tomorroa during a work ges�ion schpdnle8 !o rpview tb� County's
1984 year-end financla2 positian.
Thsre being na further businesa. thr meeting was a8journo8.
..r-..,. . .
-.� .
- :�y
'�;�*i
�,'>
`i
a,�,�<
,'t:-'
�_�:�,!f.. . . .
_�/::3` . . ,
y.,'
. '��''u; . . ' .
���K�' . . . � .
��?kSiy . . � . � � .
i���.�5 �
°Y�'�yY � .
�����J •
`{r��%��� . . .
.t�� � . . . . .
-<�
q
Coa�missioner's lteeting 8 ApriZ� 1485 - 11
f
t�; `-
1985 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PUBLIC HEARING EXHIBITS
A ri18 Hol Cross Electric Easement A Notices of Public Hearin s
1984 Employee Housing B Notice of Public Hearing Only-Note: No other referenced
Guidelines exhibits for this meetin
���,:<
15
.�. __._��.._. __.__.,.. _,__.�_ ._ . , ._.. . ._.....__ _ __.. _._. _
.. _.,., _ .:.: . . „__.,.,,.. ._ _
`u`� �
"r�
The Aspea Times '�� i
).::.:._::) t;:' i�,, . �
Box E r.r.�f;•r ,,
Publio EXHIBIT �
Aspen, Colorado D,:to yy '
.Su��{rn,t. A �� �
~ + �
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF COLORADO ) COP�/ Of NOfIC@
) ss.
County of Pitkin ) � —_ -° ----- I
i 8e:HOLY CROBB SLSCTRII;BASEI�[�T.',;.
NOTICS IB HBR68Y a1V6N t6d a k:;.t:
� wftl b�Aaid bdae�t!r 8eaid o[�r :
I� S�Tilliam �?. � Dunaway ao sotemn�y•sN�ear ihac i ��������r ��.��;
, Mnni..Apru 9.t¢91,d Sao�pm�n eha Commi��
• ( .toner:�r..�tin� wtkip couet7�conrt.�
� laur 608 6ut!��he�l;.Mpsn�:COlondo�:<`
Pul�7_isher e�eii w�raK.ro.aa� u,K�,�.-
I am the of THE ASPEN TIMES; ? ����N����
that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, ; a.noa ioc eo..+.iw ee.rttti�•coim�y eur';,'
Ndnl�eoeP�dliy.. .. ._. -
and publlshed in the Counly of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has �, For furwer�ncarm.don oona�t eh�Cawer,.�
a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been pub• � elel��Oi��jy��&^,`�'�°O��'�0''"-;
liahed continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitliin, • �T"m H1.t"::
I C�iem�o:�Bwed dCouots..a
for a period of more than fiEty-tw�o consecutiae w•eeks next prior � ������+�'����r; .
to the ftrst publication of the annexed legal notIce or advertise- � � ����'1�''= •:
ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States `' " -
mails as second�class matter under the provisions of the Act of
March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news-
paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal
notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the
State of Colorado.
ThBt the annexed legal notice or adverlisement w�as published
in the regular and enlIre issue of every� number of said weekly
newspaper for the period of � consecutive. inserttons; and
that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said
newspaper dated I��areh 28 A.D., 19.�� and that
the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news-
paper dated A.D., 19_
l�/
�
Subscrlbed and sworn to before me,.a notary public in and r
the County ot Pitkin, State of Colorad9, this �._.day of
� -) ��Ci
'Y�'�C-,� A.D., 19 './ J �.
/ - � i
i � > _�:: p 1� ,
.�-�' .��-. � . � -�� ti=-�.. '
Notary Public L: j�� ��/
My commission expires � `�
...___. _.___, _
. _ __.._. . ._.....-�
The Aspea Times '
�:.:,.;� �_ �.,�. . ..
. Box E r
r-u�aito EXHIBIT
Aspen, Colorado Du�o � �
SubjGCt , Ca�rrnf
-p
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF COLORADO ) COP�/ Of NOtIC@
) ss.
County af Pltkin ) �'� ,� ,�.,'
`R8:�A RBSOLUTION APPAOYINO`AND
'/1DOPT[Nd 18Bb BIIPLOYEB=HODBIN� '
1 ; (iUIDSLINS6 AND BBNTAL 8UB81D1Z6D;
1 lliam P, � Dunai���,y �� �$��
I, do solemnly sN�ear that eo�ig es Bxa�i�sPSrt�'=
- PITHIN`HOUSINC AU HORITY"AND:�
ACC&P7QIO:Y71B lYS{ANMIA1:86PdBT;ON �
Publ isller ,�.ou�a � �
I am the of THE ASPEN TIMES; ; Np�����By atVBN ib.t'"a'puNk
that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, �"���'°'�O��0"�'�°�
and publlshed in the Counly of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has .da�_p�ad��b•�r
�ka�'Apits,�9es,a�mruesfo6�le
a general circulation therein; that sald newspaper has been pub- �d'��OD �°����''�
C�.AdI,i0o:eeah Arr�pw.Cal�eado:b
liahed continuousl and uninterru tedly in said County oi Pitliin, °0O'�"0°"00Od'"'� i,��"b0'°
Y P rib�osi.uotofiaa.Capisdt�.fb11 aia dtL.:
for a period of more than fifty-two consecuti��e w�eeks next prior ����b.ciat'.
to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- ' �������
oQ►a.olao tao.wne.Nu.4�►�ww�a!�?. .
ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States eian tso�)�eseeia_
mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of � ~'�0°�'
- ,:Comm��� .
March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- •
paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal ���.�T�!����'.
notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the "." „� � . .. .
State of Colorado.
ThAt the annexed legal notice o: advertisement w�as published
in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly
newspaper for the period of � consecutive insertions; and
that the first publication o[ said notice was in the issue of said
newspaper dated I�arC11 28 A.D., 19�, and that
the laat publication of said notice was in the issue of said news-
paper dated A.D., 19_
/
�'�� ���
Subscrlbed and sworn to before me,.a notary public in and for
the Cordty of Pitkin, State of Colorado, this ff .day of
[� . ; .
.'�1:-..t1�-�� A.D., 19�
' '' ,i �,�� � � , -, �
�..:;1 ,C ���c ,�'1 - r: �;`� �_ >`^ "
�
Notary Public
5"�; J�.�
My commission expires 1P