The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.min.spec.03191985 � . 1 .,� Y� � y-i ':: ��„� � . t . -.- �_t '`�,' �'. l" . ��r� . .c . _ --na i..:��..«.... .,. .. ._� ,..�-_ r... �+. ...,....-....T...z....,r`�...�l..�{��'��s�.:+3.5�.��.r�1, �" .. PItKTN COONi7 8011RD OF C+OMMI$BIONBRB QP6CiAt M68 I 19 MARCN. 1985 PR636NT: THOMA3 BLARB, NELHN KLANDBRUD� G00RG8 Ml1DSSN, MICHA6L KTNSLBY Canten- The Boacd convened a epecial meeting eo coneldsr a resoluGion nlal gcantfnq final plat approvel to ebe Centennial PMH Projece. Plenner Pcojoct Cindy Nouben intiroduced the reaolution which, upon !ta appcoval, Pinal would conclude !he la»d uae revtew proc@es Eoc the employ ea Plat houeing proj@ct. Houben axplained tbat tbe Pianning Olftce ceviEtwed the genecal an8 detailed submiaslon approvals, as wall aa the piata, to detecmine aompilance with the p�evlous conditions o! a pprovalr thoae lsaues which have noe yet bean eotlsfiod, most oE whlch addresaed !he publlc imp�ovomesnts !or the Froject, were identlEiod !n the roaolution accocdingly. Ilouben eubmitled the ftnal pla! Eor cevievt the Project vas platted in thcae t3) eepa�ate phasas, Buch so that the inittal and two (2) subeaquent plat amendme�ts uould be appcoved. The lnitial plot idonEitied Buildinga P a�d Q. the Pirst amendmeot would identiFy Buildings J►, e, C and D, and the second amendment would itlenttty Building 0. These six (6) buildings conetituted all o[ tbe ownership units witbin tbe Project, and the plae amendme�ts were intended to add�ess the phasing ot the Aroject� Buildinga P and Q were completo at this tima o�d the plat 3dentiEying these bulldi�gs vould be recocded upan appcoval, vhereas tha plats identilying the �emaiaing buildit►gs vould be racorded upon their completion. Houben cecoanoeaded approval oi the re�olutlon and the plats as submitted. Jim Curtis, represent�Ln9 tbe applicant, explained that the ownecship units withio the Project vere platted in three (3) separate phases to co�ply with £ederal lendi�g requicementsi moctgages for many of the units were processed by the Fedecal National Nortgage As�oclatian, which sequlred that seveaty peccent (70�) o� tbe units in a complex be pre-sold prior to the reco�diag ot the plat. The developec has pre-sold seventy pe[ceat (708) of the units in Buildings P and Q only, such so tnat only the inikial plat could be recorded at this time; the remaining plats would be recorded once the pre-sale condition was satisfied. The subjeet propecty was divided into th�ee (3) sepacate lots only to provide for the phased sale of the units in compliance with FNMA requirementsj upon the sale of all of the ovnership anits, the three (3) lots would merge into a sin9le parcel. , Klanderud questioned the condition of approval whereby the developer would be requiced to restore the unpaved portion of • Spruce Street to semi-primitive road standards; it was not known, - for instance, why this portion of the road would remain unpaved. Joe EdWards, an attorney representing the applicant, explained that the road base for this portion of Spruce Street would be restored . Commissioner's Meeting 19 March, 1985 - 1 - ''-.:.i ,.�:.>.,;�,; .. '',' . _�,.. �+'� �.. �j '_ � � '�� rt+� . . .}t . 3, L 5�p! .,�y ,�•��t �� c r f i, � , :��r - ��j �^��:vE� � e�t '�' s� - � . . _.- _ . . . . . ....._ , �_ .. .. . .....L. .0 -,...w .. .......-.= � and remain as a gravel road at the request of the residents of the St=eett it aas felt that gravel, tather tfian a paved road, would secve to discourage automobile use in this area. County Attotney Tom 5mith noted that the Amendment to t6e Improv�nents Agreement authorized by the goard during the previous regulattneetieg ptovfded foc final plat approval upon the execution of all documents approved during that meeting= a number of documents r+ere approved during the il Merch meeting, most of vhich address�d the publi� improvementg for the Projece and adequate financial guaranteea ta ensure their completion. Smith noted that rwo (2) leCtecs ftom Citicocp Real �s[ate, identifying the amounC of funds to be pacrowed for thoap improvementa that have nat y�t been campleted, have not blpfl executed aa of this daee= the reaoluti�n 9ranting final plat approval ran not be released pending [hr ¢xecution and receipt nf the two (2) lettera. Madgen noted thac the Couney was regpongibie foc paving rhat poction of E�ark Ciccle between the Centennial property line and tfie exiating toad, and he asked iE funda had been eppropriate8 for this purpoee. Aasistant County Engineer Ron Thompson explained that funds have been appcopriated for tMis purpoae in the 1485 budg¢t. Ne note8 rhar the developer we$ required to extend perk Circle from tAe propecCy line lhcougN th@ lntecior of the pcopscty. whereas the Counly was only reaponsible Eor extending !he exlseing coad up to th@ proparty linet it wds antlelpated thee the entic@ Park Circle projece vould be placed �o bid ao a single projact ao ihat the responstb►lilties oE both partiec could be satteEiod elmultaneousiy. • Klandecud noted tbai neitber !ho 38ndscaping nor 1lghtSng plans hAVC becn ravfawed by the Pianning and 8oning Commiesion at this tlme, and eho questioaed the mochaniam wherreby tJ�eee two �2) conditiona of approval would bo enforced. Smitb explained that ' tunds havo bee� appcoprieted and identttied vithin tl�e context oE the amended Imp�oveasente Ag�eement for tbe campletion o! both the landecaping and lighting plansJ tbese funds would be made avatlablc to the County in the event the plans we�e not loaplowented as appcoved. Io additloa, che reviaw and approval oE both plans by the Planning a�d Eoning Co►amission, and tbeSr implame�tation aceordingly, vas identi[led ae a condttion oE appcoval in the resolution aub�ttted !or �oard reviev todayt compliance with thla condition vas a subject of finAl plat appcoval, a�d in tha evcnt ot non-compliance, auch approval could ba revoked. Smlth noted tor the recocd tbat fi�al p1At approval wae limited to tha ownarehip unita only. and that 1t did �ot apply to the cantal portion oF tha prcject. Klanderud expcessed some concern that the plats ideoti�ied tfiree t3) sepa�ate lots within the Project, such sa tbat f1na1 plat approval vnuld, in eff ect, constitute subdlvieion approval as well. Edwards explained tbat separate iots were identiiied ooly to comply vith FNl1A cequi�etnents with [e�pect to the ghased sale of the uniksJ upon the recording of the two (2) amended plats, the enti�e property would merge into one (1} paccel and the entire pcoperty vauld be reflected as a single condominium association common element. In addition, upon the completion of the entire Project, a final amended plat would be �ecorded ceflecting a sfn9le parcel. Madsen then moved to approve the resolution. Rlanderud seconded and the motion passed with an abstention from Rinsley, vho abstained from all proceedings. These being no fu=thet business, the meeting was adjoutned. ..s � � ' Commissioner's Meeting 19 l4arch, 1985 - 2 �.ya7 ,-4�' _.1 1� 'r 3T� Y i