Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.res.065.1985 , - �-�:: t���� '�J�� 3. .;. .-., cz4is.,t-�se�'�'^e',r�'Sf'..... .sw�..x....,... .- ., . .v'�Ikie�o-'�:w! . , . '�]Tf�f'!�5�r� RBSOLU?IOli OP Ttl8 HOARD OF COtltl!'Y COlIMZSSIO118R8 OP PI?i[I11 CdJlfil. COLOR11D0► 6ND0ltSItG THR GOAf.S !4![b OgJ�C?YV88 AliD P07tiRE L1lND U88 M11P OE 4BE ROARIlRS FORIt EJ1S'1' HE2GtIBO1tdOOD ltAS'!6R PLAiis A COl�1'O11!!!1'!' OF 'lg6 1►SPgN ARSA COMPRCBEtiSIYL PLAlf ` Reso2ntion No. A5� 65 MN6RltA8, th� Pitkin Connty Planninq and Zoning Comrt+fsaiOn (hereinaf[er "Commisaion") is authorized to periodicaliy cevitw. cevfap. amend nnd extend in greater detail componencg of thc Cnmhcehe- na(ve Pian Eor Pitkin Cauntyr and NHRREAB, the Commiesion, in cooperetion with che Aepen Pianninq end Zoning �ommissian and the Boacd oE Councy Cotnmiesioners of Piekln Cou�ty. Colorado (herefnofcer "9oord"f, ace pcecently connfdering che reviaion of the 2l7� Roaring tork tait laMndaen! to !At 1l66 Npien Ase G�tf�r�l Planr and NBRREAB, ehe bauntlories of thc Roartnn Fork Eaat Neiqhborhood Pianning Arca l�cludQ land contiquoun �i�h Seatc NIqI1MdY 82 betuec� th� City oE Aapen o�d th� qi![Icule Cam��ound: and MBEREAS, tha cevlsed Plan fot th� Roarina Pork Faee Area wlll be knovn as the Roari�g �ork lt�tt Meighborhood Naster Pl�nr and ` MNERiA8. the Co,�nmieslon, in ca�peratian �ith tho I►apen Planning and Zoninq Commisaian, t�s devolopinq a nev Canpraheneive Plan tor the Aspen Arerer a�d �s M96R6AB, khe area rrirhin thr Roactag lock 6�s! NeighborAood IUst�c 81ae cocresponds vitb r�ro of the fourteen 111? planning areas ` vithi� the Aspen Areat and � ; 1�ERlU18, the Roaring �ork Rast Nelghbo�hood Msater Plan will be i f one component oE the Aspen Aiea CompCehensive Planr and i % MaER6AS, the existing conditiops in the Roari�g Fork East � Neighborhood Master Planning A�ea have been analyzed and dacumented � within the Aspen Asea Canp�et�ensioe Plaa: E:istiAg Conditl�e ip tbe :� A6pOa Asea fAugust 1985); and t •� fiHER811S, a pub2ic neighborhood roeeting was held on March 28, i 1984; and "� IiBBRS1IS, the Commission held public meetings on Flarch 16 and 26, -; 1985 to discusa land use considerations in the planning area; and `:- s fiHBRBAS, the Commission held public heazings on llay 19 and !!ay 2B �,,.� �J �� -- _ i , .�.:: �,-�,-�'��"srt ca°S� r �.) .i , f �. `; � � - I, ,j���� 4.�`�-�'F { c €I`� J�- . .. '.; ..: Iz �.-z • 2` �.f .>�fi� 3h� � R, � •.ii.Y-;,� � Yr�? J:��� :�'�'��' 7. � � .!'' . ,. t.•K'.t4"3� W"��t�,.._'.,.�.':.s...ctey_ . _ . . .. . •-.l�� r Reaolntion lto. as-6s Page 2 1985 to consider the pcopoaed Roarinq Pork !laot 1leiqhDoshood Mesler Plan; and � NBSRRAS, the Board held a public work sesaion on April 9, 1985 to digcuss th� pcoposed Plan; and 1IH8RRA8. ic is undecs�ood by the noACd that develapment of the Roacing �ork sast Ntigl�bothaod Mailec Plen is en angoing process and that after Euture conelderatiort by the Commission �t may be neceueary to revlae th� Plan prior to tts adoptiont and ' NBERRJIB, i[ ie und�ra�ood by the Commiesion and Board that camprehensivp pinns ere ronceptual in noture and subject to cevision to provide futuce laod use flezibility� and 11RRReAB. !t l s undr.ti ntood thAi the en�loracd �cfnq lork Ea�t 1NlqALorhood Maitfr Plan will b¢ subsequenely rolurnQd to the Conunis- aion for theis Earmal adopeion as pa�� aE thQ Aogoing publLc plen�ing pcoccao aaaociat�d wlth dovrlopinq a na�e plan for the Aspon Area. NOM, �aRalORE, ea i'! R68d.v6D by the aoard that chQ leoarlaq rork East tl�iqhdorbood Ilaate� plan Goala and ObjcaEivea ancl Future l.and uae Nap are cndpraod aa a guido to tho canpletlon of the Plan and aa a gulda to the reviov af lancl uaes In the planning acea. ' APPROVW by the Aoard a! its regular mecting on June 10, 1985. C /� M �,/���y Qa /� .� BV�W C� 4W1�a• �lYVTN�Y� OT PI'tRIll COD/t!'!. ORJ1D0 � '� �� 6y a�w�, / Tom Blaka, Chaicpersan _ A� lfJ �r l : � Gex Scanlao. aeputy County Cleck , � AlfCQMM6liD6D tQR AFPRdfIAL: Alan Richman Planning and Development Airector APPRW BD AS '1'O !ORl1 s - � �� _ � , � ' omas F. Smith, County Attorney ••'�;::ti. G H.5 '�r'- ��Y' s�� c ' �l . .'�.,�. � ' l'',' ���3+ �°� r 5 y,"Y'" �_; ,f��u,,''5 �:'�.a-.�SYJ�"i�"P'ER' . 4,J� y�a;•K �:� J . � ..;� ��� fl � ��.� ��� L :y.������.f(�{���1 .., r . �.�=3 rr'"'.'���...w-•d�S.+.«Aa+�?.+'..�.:�-� R!M'fw!+R1M�/ .' A. Land Oae Goals an8 Objectives I. Putnre Land Use � '� Goai: proaote a develop�eent pattern tbat preetrves the ' e:istinq character of the neighborhood, caspl�npnts ehe scenic qunlity goal and mini�ises the adverae �nviron- nental iapacts associated with developnent. ► objectives: a. Identify portions of in the area Nhich are prtfecced dcw elopmcnt sltes due to thetc limited visibility from S[ate Hinhuay 82. b. Encoucage �he limieed cluscering oE development on parc¢ls which have the least vi�ual impact from 5tate Nfghwoy 82. c. Maintain, to rbe gceairat extent possible� the existing vecy low dertsity develop�aent paEterna. d. Consider rezonings to further reduce development potential. � e. Encourege land uses which minimise eutomobile dependenc@. f. Eacoucage the pceaervation anA/or expansion oE Scrlqs�@d lantl. g. Proteat tbe tiortb Star Natur@ Prsaerv@ Erom iecomEratiblo la�d uaes in ieo vicintty. h. Seek aa irt�ecgo�acemo�tal ann�xation and devolopment agrQCment betwacn the City o� Aapen and Pltkln County !o eneuro that Euturo developa�ent in ehe area cemeins consialant with eha adopted ma0tec plan and lnveatlgate annexarion of thc Mouneain Vallc�� Area. i. Proc]ude noa-reatd�nttal and non-agriculturaldevelopment. 2. 6nvicoru�antal Quality � Goals Areeecve anvlroeu�entallt sensitive �ifAi and prohibit devalop�an! icoa occucri�g ln aceas �hieh ace unwttabl� !o[ developwet►t. Objnctivea s a. tleasly idcntify environmental constcaints to davelop�nent in the area. - b. Ide�tlfy sites foc develop�nent that ace not sobject to severe enviranmental ha:asds. a 3 -�, � . ''� :�� -,� ;�;�;. `.�:::. �'a':�^: ` �: i t`�'�.,i•.:_:� � . ><a�„ . ��_ +� � �n � r., :. •� ,„�,"'�-.�x;.e'�'' � �� ,, a� �a f�c ii+ny"'�-:.,;. � L �`. .-;.' � , .� r��� ...la �� ��.!iiLl � f�i�� � �.�' �a� F'_��'..,��:=:.�e --�.�:.�: . -e�,-.. ., �..��•:�at�«�. ,e�..._ . .L.,_.:= . c. Recognize existing vegetation in the ar�a as a valnable LOSOUtCC and encouragp developers oE vacant gcound to preserve vegetation to the maximurt extent possible. d. Require futuce develapments to conform Mith Connty landscaping guidelin�s in ocdec to ensure consistent, compatible veg�tation throuqhout the area. . e. R�cognize the �ensitivity aE Che tJOrth Star Natuce Pcesecve anc insure [hat Euture land uses in the vici»ity ate com�tible. f. Pursue environmentally �ound mpthods of insect conteoi. 3. Scenlc Quality ' lioai: Pcesecve and eehanee tl+e aaenic quai�ty of Lfie Roaring Pork Baat Aila for !Ae benefi! of tesid@n!. and Eh• continned viability oE Pitkln County's reiort econowy whicb ie. in perl, dependenr upon the quelity of the rural settinq. . objectivea: a. Pramot� aesthetic improvemenCO to, end po0itive visual imaqea of existinq developments in the Planning Area by auch acetona ea undrrgcoun�iing uttlitiea end guidiog thQ locatLon oE new dev�lopment ao that detr[mental impacta upon vtauel quality ace r+inimlzed. b. Bstob]ish a sacnic foreground contlquous with &tate Nigh►+ay 82 enil etoer dev@lopmene away lco�th�foreg�ound. c. Devolop incentivea Eor propQrty ow�ers !n �he area !o p�caervn land i� the ace�lc foregrou�d ea open spoco and/oc rcareattonal aitas. d. Arovido consiatent, high levela oE mainteoonce !ot all elemenCa oi �he open apace, �arka and cecreational lactlittca. �. North Star Nature 8resecve Goal: Preserva and enhance the Norlb Star Naiure Pseserve tor � the beneti! o� residents in Pitkin County as vell aa viattocs to the Conwunity. obj�cttves: a. In bhc shurt-term, contioue to manage the t7artb Star - Nature Pce$erve according to c�nststenk vitb the oXiginal intent o� tha North Star acquisition uoless it can be demo�strated that more nctive use will not be detrimental to the sensitive enviconmental character � i; .� � �.� �� �, �. . ,!� :� . ,.x... ... , x � h �'�t� i4 .,4 3' ���..''� �ry, 1 6fy��'.T'• r—�'s r�s^ ..-�,�Ytc$•'' ... -c r'< �Y�;'�'4 ��" .`y�y }'Yj�'" � . .. . � �a _��..� F.i..��s�.i.i:r.l'lh�i�'.���w�!* .�� . �`�'�.��M���i5f1��.. � and rrildlife of Notth 5tar oc incompatible r+ith the area. b. Preparp and a8opt a long-term u�anegement plan fcrr the North 5tar Natuce Preserve which is cevieved and revised as neccssary on a regular basis. c. �h� lonq�tecm managem¢nt plan should: _ o Identify access points and patking locations foc , peoplp who wish to vfait the Notth 5tar Natuce Prese[ve. o Establish guidelines fot the development and manag�ment of lo�+ intensity cecreariona2 tcailg that may traverae the site. d. Insure that developmenFS adjacent �o the lrocth Stac Natuce Prenerve are pla��ned in a mannec which is campaCib]e wilh .: the Preaecve. TRANSPORTA'lION (i0l1L8 AHD 09JaCTIV88 � The Eoilowinq qoals end objectives are intendQd to pcovi8e a generai guide Eor tranaportaeton planning in the acea. ` A. 8t�t! Biqhway 82/ROSdt coai: Maint�in Stat� Alghvay s2 in its prea�nt •eatns bnt provide lner�a�ed safety for pedestrians aed biayeiist� on t�� eighray snd on eubdirision roadvays. Objectiv@ss 1. Provide a saEc oqerating onvironmcne Eor all mod�a o! transportaelon inaluding bicyeles and pedeatrtans through the installakion oE blk� lo�ea on th� ahouldec o! State ; Nighway 8?. 2. Pcovida af eho en€occoment oE speed limits Qn Stete Higb++Ay Q2. 7. Improve �deatrtan acceas wtthtn Hxlattng su4divlatons. . A. Mtni�nizc roc�d euta on State Highvay 82. _ B. Nass Tceneit Goal� Opgrede tbe �aaes tsaasit aystem vhich utilises State flighray 92 to �ake it pore convenient. eost eLficient end enviconwentally souad to cesidents io Mt. Valley ases. b c� 1� � � i ' �� ' � ,<�c-'—.'�: ,r3"r. ,�4 i T=�� . �.': � „�.�.�;, ;�� X 4(.�.. . .� �j. : � . -A g� , � �'4' -� �S'�'� ��! frY�' ►!i ' � � .. . t_ r t ��y��l �5 �e � . . � -_3 � e`-1- ��I.$i�..� a/" �!h^f--._ .W r �`��.'�.. - ._ _ . . .. .. . ,+'�'�'-�Ti'�°j���l�-. ob j ectiv es: 1. Encourage cpsidents and tourists to utilize the mass transit system. 2. Establish deaignated bus stops rather than stop on demand bus service in order to improve saEety on Statp Highway 82. C. PeBesttian/Bicycle/Nordic Traiis Systen � Goal: Strive to upgtbae the pedeatrian, bicycle and nordia traile systea in the /►ree fo[ recreational en�oy�ent and as an alternative to vehicular tcavel. 06jectives: a. Obtain right-of-Way or easements foc trails ldentified in the Master Plan as part of the lt�nd uae review procoso or as - a pact of the Cicy and County capi�al improvement process. b. Provide Eor non-automotivc trensportat[on mo8ec, including bicycies. in planning Eor the upgrading oE Statg Highway 82. c. Incorporate ehe Salvation Ditch �nto tfie trail syatem. ' d. Provide aafe, diccc� trail acccaa Eor cbildren livinq Ln rQaiae�tioi orcaa to Aspen and bus atopa. R6Y TO ROARING PORR E1�4T N62CRBORA000 KAST6R PLANt Ptl'L't�R6 6AND 086 NI1P The Futur� LanA Usc �lap Eor the Roaring Fork Eaat flelghborhood �18nnLng Acea is a depietion of bor+ ehe CommuniEy'a Goala and Objeelfves Eac the Planning A�ea can be oahieved. It ia baACd upon meppin� of thc Scenic Foreqround, a detmilecl phyacinl analyala of kMe land and an evaluallon af th� capabtlity to provtd� publia aervtcea. Tho map lndtcatea b�oad land uao deslgnaeians. a�d portcrya a aomrwha! idcaliatic �oncept Loc lutuce laacl use which ia intended to aerve aa a qenesal gutdc tor Eulure land u�e doalaians. t�o aElew�t hAa be�n t��d� to define exoct baundacias Detvcan cllffcrent land uscs. Thc aix land use dtst�icts and ane lnnd uae clssignattan apQeaci�g an the ma�p ace addreuscd bclav. ° A. Reaource Coneacvation - RC fyellow) A dcsignation applied to kher majocity o( th� prlvate lan� 1� the - planning a�ea due to its vlsual sensieivity, envitonmental charaeteristics, relatianship to essent3al publfc aervicea� at►d tha cammunity goal to preserv� these �isually vul�e[able, envicon- mentally sensitive areas ta the g��ate�t degcee posaibl� in their present state. The cammunity yaal Eor the distcict ia to pcesetve the vast majority of existing open space and irrigated land in khe area while p�rmitting isolaked, �on-intensi�e, very lav density reaideatial devel4pn:ent. Hon-�esidential develo�nent � � � � .�< '7:. � • � �__._,_ _ �-�,,. ' '�.,�fe"° ,.,"x'.`" '� ` ,:. ,, f" - w +..z,�.,c�. ��}� y% ati ='� - � �� t 3 f � : ��'�, '� `-'�i_e`�i��,+ x��k `�. �: ��r � ,.�� -s.. ..aR�,e .x..._.-,» ::��,++t:?'�+R?�>s�.e�"... ..���.. a�1.a ' v.�i4'"• � a- �_ . is �onsidered to be incompatible with the intent for this area an� should be prohibited. 8. Low Density Residential - LDR (bcown) A designation recommended for existing resident3al subdivisions which may be svitable fo[ additional development baspd upon an � analysis of land ucc chatacteristics and the ability of the community ta provide services. Principal uses ir:clude clvseectd gt�nie-family dycllinqs.l The density of 4ow Density Residentlal r development will vary from threp units pet acre to one uniC pec tao arc�s dependinry upon thp unique site �haraecrristic� and compatl- bllity viih sucrounding areas. C. Low Density Cluster Residential - LCR (qcay) A designatinn cecor.mende8 for areas located outgide the Scenic Foraground ahich may be sultable for some ievel oE clugtpred residential drvelopmrnt. No++ever, due to the �ristfne natur�► oE euch areas and pr�zimity ro the North 5ter �atucc Preeecve, these oreas ar� not guitable Ear drvelc�pmcnE drnaittcs a� hiryh as those propoaed within the Clugter RenidenEfal FUtU[@ Lnnd Vae Diatrict. Prineipal uflea may include ctus�eced singie-f hmily end cluplex dwellin�s. Certain areas mey be auieabl� for m�re innovativ� cluateced �ypes oE honsing, including. but not limitcd to zero lot lin¢ housea, toxnhousea, patfo hc►uaeo and atcium heusess. The densi�y of reaidentiol dcw elop�rsent ie tho digerict moy vacy from one unit nec twa acr¢a to one untt pc+r four ocrea depenclinq upon on onalyals c+f foctora uuch e►a e�viranmEOtal g�nsielvity, n�t�hbot- hood compa!lbility� avallability oE urbansservicea, coad copaaft�ea. ond conets►tency vleh kh� adopted goala anci abj�ctives oE the Robri�g Fork rast !►clghhorhood Nag��c i�lan. D. Aubiic/2nstitutional - P2 (pucplcl A designation tntendccl Eor only tho Aspan G�ovc Cmnftery. 6. Open 8paca/Recraation/Packs - O�SRf+ (green) A deaignation applied to r ma�ori�p ot 2and i� the Plan�inq Aroa. Land �esignrbed QSRA ia owned by Pitkin County. the Untl�d Statoe Pocea� Sc�rv3ce and tsu�oau ot Lond NanagemQnl. Pctncipal uaea could inelucic. but arc nat limited eas natuca preoetvea, pasks. equ@�tria� ctnears. graxinq and opon space. ' �. Ccaeks/RivarstOpen Spac4 - CRdS tblue-graen) A deaignation applied tn the ciparian acea bordering creeka aad �tvers in study area. Gand designed as c�ecks/civecs/open apace shauld be pcese[ved frem devetapment to Pcovida protection tor the stceae+ bed and accscs for fishecenan. _ �See Kendig, Gan�; Performance xoning, p. 51. 5 � � ' � '}:� , � �;. � .. _ ��.;�y�, ,�,�'3 .l;� ��3c '_;£��.�Xf:.-.. -s.�-:;�� ' � �.i E� . $� ' �p -'� r t' x ; y_F��� _ .....'�1 y .�.._`y.v4r��i�•�.��.... ��{i,��n•? �'� '� +a w_-� . . Y +'.�'�'�. #. � . G. Scpnic Foregroand — . 'fhos� lands proximate to Scatp HighWay B2 which are most visible from the roadw�y and which constitute the visual entcance image to hspen. The purpose of establishing the Scenic Faregcound Is to steer development aaay from highly visible siteg and to � minimize the visual impacts of the limited development which may occur in the foreground so as to obtain an aeathetically pleasing. cural approach to twrn. Areas located aithin the dotted pattern on �he Map ace �ithin che 5cenic foreqround. suemary and Recoowendutfon This memorandum has sumr,�ariaed isaueg and concerna relat�d to the Roaring Fork East tteighborhood Mascec P2an. Me encouragt you to � review the pcnponed goala and objecrtves and the key to the plan and � reeommend improvemeets. eased upon your commenis at the merting we recommend that you direct the Planning Office to prepare a resolution � for fulure consider�tton r�scomnending ihe Roering Fork East lieiqhborhood Master Plan io the City Council Eor their endorsemene. S v � J � `€° �c i� � ;� � 7- f' _ � � -a � � ' •�.'. t ,F:`- �'�;n �1' :.;�� , i y - �.f� �,,i� r�'< °'� . . . . . .,�. .. . . �� �., y�..ti� ..«_ ... � . .._.?. . .....�a._.fe�i'r� � =1[.�r •x .. � � � � ;� I� }� � - � � �j + � � - � � • i � i ' \.�-- �Zy)y .; ` . �• j �. f:�:��,.,;� __. - f r �,�F - , : `� - �.��; �:: � - .�'f �� : . Y_���;:.,. ;,.:k_w - . ., i- �. � � . ,- , .. ' � �.ti � � ' F f � E � _ _ _ _ tCi�� � _� . ._J — � — — - uC .+.• � _ _ ` � . . .r.' `'`.' ` _ . i ' � � .. . t �\ �� ` � C OSlx � wC '=— , - -;�,_ c nG . �� � `� - i+c ; ROARING FORK EAST NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: ,���..�«�,E��E� � ...., _. .. __.___- o ., ,.. -��,a- � y4 � .r�:;��, ..� :�_� � N Q w w, w..�..cw �� �j' I G ws,r..+w wi J _.—. � Q a�w......o...o..as.v '�a _� � �� � � � � � � �� �• . 4�w�M✓tkwYS��?CL 4 � _ � � ��� ���� ��� ����� �_�_� � f � � �`� . ..� '�'� \ �