The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.min.reg.10271986 � .i;Y{�;- . . r a�� .��;�s�:��;�.,� �� , k .�� .��-� ,�� -�, ' ._ . . _ .. .. . . . ��._ .� � r~��. '��: � �y f MEETING WILL BE IN GARDEN LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM i , � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA , j OCTOBER 27� 1986 j:'.:a:.`-,.. . . . ��r::r;',. �.. LA*ID L?SE N.'�, �`` "-` 9:00 a.m. Public Hearina-Gibbons 1041 Flood Plain Hazard � LL Francis Krizmanich 9:30 Public Hearina - Piffer Z041 Floodplain Hazard, � , Francis Krizmanich 10:00 Public Hearinq - Aspen-Mass Ranch Rezoning, � Francis Krizmanich (to be tzbled to 11/l0/86) !�°��' a: 10:05 Beriro Plat Amendment Subdivision Exemption, ``'"+. Francis Krizmanich � 10:10 Resolutions and Contracts Endorsing the Pitkin County Down Valley Comprehen- ' i sive Plan, Glenn Horn . Aunter Creek Plat Amendment Resolution, Cindy � Houben i Jandegian Plat Amendment Resolution, Francis � � Krizmanich - � Starwood Ranch Datailed Submission Resolution, � � ' Francis Krizmanich 10:30 Executive Seasion-Litigation, Tom Smith �' r• 12:-00 LUNCH BREAK �" � ,�. - i 1:30 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT ADMINISTRATION I1:45 Resolutions and Contracts � ,� Minutes (10/14/86) I 1987 FAA Entitlement Grant, Ann Bowman •. Courthouse Attic Value Engineering/General '� ' ' j Contractor Award & Agreement, Vinny Belfont "' , ! Procurement Coda Revisions Resolution, Tom Smith � Designate A New Polling Place, Loretta Banner E Airport Food Service License Extension, Ann Bowman � ; 2:00 Public Hearina: Re-issuance of Single Family F{ j Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Highlands Villas and ,:� . � Hunter Creek, Jim Adamski (to be tabled to 11-17- ! 86) 2:15 Greg Mace Commemorative Resolution, Mark Fuller � 2:30 Public Hearina: Change name of a Portion of Spruce Street to '�South Avenue", Tom Newland . ``� 3:00 1ST Readin4 & Set Public Hearina: Personnel � - Manual Revision Recommendations, Bill Ripp r=:'� � 4:00 Adjourn �' I � THERE WII,L BE NO MEETINGS ON OCT.28� NOV. 3 AND NOV. 4 i ' I i � S:.. : .. . . _ , .., - , ',:�3, , � � ., ;, �1� ,: • � r .�. : -. .� ' 1 ,. . .'. 5 .eA"✓z�c�'�,M '3` ,p>Y+. y' � � .. : ., •' _ r�`,�� C�"''t�,;.'��"�-,�`'��.��a�—,•,�^�'"��'i.�.51��,}��. .w..,q. �`'��Y'.3�,� A`'_Yr.... �_5��'`�'�s#�.`��2`t��`'�1 �..: � � - ' � , a......r��.:7.. , .. 'i , a,�y"' .'. .:. ! ' PITKIN COIINTY �: i BOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERS � ' OCTOBER 27 1986 � � j REGIILAR MEETING i pgEgyN7+; gpg gR�QDIS, VICE CHAIR; BOB CHILD, GEORGE MADSEN, TOM BL2�RE. � .�i ------------ , ;: LAND IISE SECTION . PLTBLIC �'ARTNG - GIBBONS 1041 FLOODPLAIN AAZARD ERANCIS RRIZ- MANICH - (9:00 a.m.) - . Francis explained application. It is a request to build a 3,000 .:;:--; , sq.ft. residence in the Aspen River Valley Ranch on a 22 acre parcel. Francis stated that there are no major issues with this proposal. The area proposed for the dwelling is out of the flood plain. Bob Child expressed a hope that when the Code is rewritten, ic , will be made clear exactly what is necessary to show that water is available and when it must be proven. 1 IAt this point Braudis opened the Public Hearing and asked for • I comruents from the public. There being none, the public hearing , { was closed. �, � t , � George clarified wording as regards "air quality" on Page 2. It t� should read: "one fireplace.�� Francis will correct. . ,; i ;, � Madsen made a motion for approval with the conditions listed by _ � the Planning Office. Child seconded. There being no further discussion, a vote was taken. All are in favor. Motion carries. "t Copy of inemo from Krizmanich (10-27-86) containing list of condi- 4 tions attached hereto and made a part of this record. 9 PIIBLIC HEARING - PIFFER 1041 FLOODPLAIN HAZARD, FRANCIS RRIZ- � MANICH - (9:30 a.m.) � Francis presented the request for 1041 floodplain hazard review ,. 1 approval to add an addition to an existing residence. Building ''•t., improvements will be outside of the mapped 100 year floodplain. !�`�.�. Applicant is also requesting to convert a garaqe to a caretaker unit and requests a variance to the setbacks. Francis stated - that he was mistaken with the setbacks in that the Code allows � Planning to vary setbacks in R-30, this zoning is RS-30 and .'�' therefore, if the BOCC approves this, the applicant will have to � � ; go to the Board of Adjustment to get a variance to the setback. � �': � ' t: � Commissioner's Meeting 1 october 27, 1986 �,�. • � i:;;.�.r._ �= I # ; S_:_: ,..L .._ a . ...- . . ��1�� 4_,t;,� ^a�v...� .. r � ;.. � . .. . � . . .� ' . .. � . �t�-w,g'��'�_` ... . . . . . � . . ..�7""`*.�� _ . � . - . , � �� " . - . ' . . r � �� . ' . . � � , ' � ,. � � . " � t> � ` �,�� L j, ��...`� �.r_, . . , � . . , . . . � e r;< � - . � � . .: � . �°t'�=ry.��',``�r . ' . �. . � - � � .� . . ... , . . ,, ,.__..... , ��`.r��::�: _ . . ' . � . � r „� �d..t._., . ..- . r4� ;� . . "�``� '� '%.y � : � . . �'ti' _ ':i�l � ' . � . F y tti:.; ( i��_ � �. � - ,: __ � • .i�� _ _ � � : : � ��'�:'7,r a�'u',�°�'� � ��'"��: �c;�y,"+.,}��y+ -�� ^ �- �� . „� �yy � "�� ,.� ;k ' .;� <'.n�.-i��t iFP '4�a1 3..7'�f'�'�.i�:' f� ` iYi.� "�. '�,��y.„y..� =�f,}� } � . . , , ....,._ ., .,._..... . t"�.` A:t,r A.,...m'fi�..�.a,,"',�"�a w.e"�..�.�"&�'.f3'"�`.�`.a:. �`. . (. t � Regarding the guest house, Planning cannot recommend granting it because this is a seven (7) acre lot in what is a 30 acre zone i district. This is not permitted by the Land Use Code. Francis stated that Mrs. Piffer has contacted her neighbors and there is no problem with the variance being requested. _.`�.'. Francis states that t'he P & Z and Planning Staff recommend ..-, approval of this application. ,, . Braudis opened the public hearing portion and asked for comments. : There being none, public hearing was closed. Madsen made motion to approve with the conditions listed. Child � ` • seconded. There being no further discussion, a vote was taken. : �"��' All are in favor, Motion carries. Copy of inemo from Krizmanich � `. (1 0-2 7-8 6) con tain ing list of conditions attached hereto and made � a part of this record. ; ��. - + Since the Board was runnina ahead of schedule and Lenny Oates was . . � present for the 10:05 a m item thev decided to address it i `� ' � first. � � � . • i - BERIRO PLAT AMENDMENT SIIBDIVISON EXEMP'PION - FR�NCIS RRIZMANICH- �� " a (9:30 a.m.) ; Francis opened the meeting by stating that this is a request for � � � a plat amendment to change a utility easement. The parcel is Lot `.�.i' • 9 in the Ridge of Red Mountain Subdivision. There is an existing - ti n• house on the lot. The house was built on top of a fourteen foot r;.�• ' (14�) wide utility easement. Lenny has letters from all utility �`..: � companies that .night be affected and they have no problem with ��';:. ' i movin the utilit easement. It will delete the R:`• � 4 Y present easement „ t � ;. ! that runs through the house. Madsen made a motion to approve this application. Blake seconded. . ; There being no discussion, a vote was taken. All are in favor. � Motion carries. � • " , : PUBLIC HEARING - ASPEN-MASS RANCfI REZONING, FRANCIS RRIZMANICH- I (10:10 a.m.j ' � Francis stated that the applicant requests that this item be S�'.'� ' � tabled to November 10, 1986. i'.s.,�:' � � Blake made a motion to table to November 10, 1986. Madsen �g� -1` ! seconded. There being no discussion, a vote was taken. All are l.. in favor. Motion carries. (:.��-'.� George Stranahan was present and requested that this item be � scheduled later in the day so that he would be able to attend. �-:'t� ,.,: : Board directed Belfont to schedule this item in the afternoon. Commissioner's Meeting 2 October 27, 1986 � #�.' , I ej°!` _ , � -�^j .: � ,;,.� :r.; '..:.,. , :. - ; � � .� _ _; , :. t,� o�,._ , , _.�:.-- ": �� .. �S'w_;. �Ax�yG . . _ • . ,�,y � '. . � . . - ' . . . . . � • � � . .(��:'�,� ]..� 7 �` ' `,�ipaJxga F' _ � , . . -�t..:�° `' ��,,, ;•: �-�-` � `= . �,.NS"`'`� _'. ` ,.._. . W�� ' - _:._.. � .r 4 � .. � � � . � f� r� � � r,:f.... . � �� I ' ^t. T',`J . ('.. ':.,7{.-. 1-. . . �'-.�1_ - � � . W`_ �1'' .��: . ... , � : . '.. '.:�. � ;�. . , . . . .:y. - '. :' . :-. -..;. t . ..: . ,.. :� �..�. . .e� . . - . ... . �. l r a.4 � ��^ "t� x�'�-��'�� !,+W .¢, x2 ��:�rP4 ^ 1��'�.-r '�.^�M��'�,�',k'�"�'+3^d., _ � , . :; Pi�:� ��,. ., �.�`�i_:,t `r ;i� �*.,r,y. ,t°.-w t., -. �,x`._ .�;,, �-�� rv�:,�€"`�,. _.. � . . ...., �� ... . ... ..., � . ,.,-• . .. . . } 'Si i'� ri :� � RESOLUTIONS AND CONTRACTS - (lU:l3 a.m.) � .. ( 1) Endorsing the P�+tcin Countv Down Valley Comorehensive ! , Plan, Glenn Horn i '. x Glenn� explained, tb.at the P&Z has worked on this Plan for ' quite a while. •Tt is now 85� to 90$ completa. The purpose of ' this resolution•is for the BOCC to now endorse the concepts °"" of th� .plan. They should recommend any changes that they Peel ar� necessary to the P & Z. The P & Z will work on it further and try to get it in a form that all agree upon � before adoption. �`' �:� � . Blake again stated that he wauld like to see �his plan again � � as it progresses in P&Z. Glenn will brinq next draft back _ :; to BOCC for camments. , 1�� •:,.,,.f .: �? Braudis asked to go on the record with statements he made �-r;;:';�,.,' -y during the SOCC work session last week. He states that i...-.`.�• there is no "etched in granite'� deadline for this plan. We established an arbitrary deadline £or tha staff to get this • ' '. done by some general time period, but we are not committed .. i� to or zealous about getting this legislation implemented by °7 the end of the year. Blake agrees and would like to concentrate on leqislation. ' �� : . �.. �' y Braudis asked if there was any public comment on this. e ^� George Stranahan stated that he would like preservation of � ;;l agricultural lands as part of the plan. BOCC agrees that � { this is a major part of the plan. , Blake made a motion to forward this to the Planning and , • Zoning Commission with Board oP County Commissioners - recommendation for approval. Madsen seconded. All are in favor. Discussion: Madsen supports Blake�s comments. Would like to maintain schedule as much as possible. Chuck Vidal feels a the word "agricultural" is a very broad term. Feels that in dealing with P&Z Commission and Planning staff, he feel they - are not really sure what that means. We need to be more �.� definitive as to what that term means. P&Z needs to be �'•- � 1 directed to be more specific. There being no further discussion, a vote was taken. All � are in favor. Motion carries. i ... 2) Hunter Creek Plat Amendment Resolution - Cindv Houben � Blake made a motion to approve. Madsen seconded. There � ' being no discussion, a vote was taken. All are in favor. 't � Motion carries. ,, � .`� Commissioner's Meeting 3 October 27, 1986 � I - . �: i �, S � �a,.,;;�... , � , ':�: y�,+£.,;�i . �� . 4� � . . . . . . . ' ;y�'�T'��F . - . . . � . . - . � . . � Yf� , _ � . . � . . . . . . . , �. � 3� fil��. Yn-. .. . � � , ' , ` . . . ��r . . . . � � . . ac � t lJ.i �11 ': Tc .. . ` . � .. : ... � � ... wd( . . . . . , .. _.. ......,_.. - �.�,,y.��z ,:.. � . ... , �...... �` ' � � .,...-� , fa��y'�'�..I , . . � ,. , . _ . � a 4„�'yPV �,� � � . 54:i. .:!j'-�,"i � ..' .�� t:�..,,•. :.':t:� ). ' , t _ , � �[�� .. � _. _ � . _... ... . . .. ,.. �Q'.�rr;.A.��s� ..c�x�}�_ iY'�.,r��y,�'�s�l +F�.:. uy'� :G¢..�-a-�• � �`.r�^ag'atr . �� j�� e . . . '-- [5'..., .' �j '"�'�. FSaE y� N a^+�.vt k�_ +y -Q F�i�"�q� ' z�, i 4.. � _-.� ...,_.� , .. . ,r..sa:_, y ... _:y'. . .s::__r.r.ir�..,.. r.. . �;,,.� s.. s�........_ .,.�.._..x��.l.�3c w9" _..... �j , �.- : ; 3) sandeaian Plat Amendment Resolution - Francis Rrizmanich Child made a motion to approve. Blake seconded. There ' being no discussion, a vote was taken. All are in favor. :: ` Motion oarries�:�'' `' � _ 4) Starwood Rancti Detailed Submission Resolution - Francis Krizmanich ;`. Blake made a motion to approve. Child seconded. There � � being no discussion, a vote was taken. All are in favor. j';' Motion carries. - I THE gOISpWING ITEM WAS ORIGINALLY TO BE DISCUSSED DURING EXECU- '.�"`�=.,:�'�.. I TNE SESSION. COUNTY ATTORNEY DETERMINED THAT THIS WAS NOT �,l;;.;_�. � � NECESSARY. ITEM FOI�LOWS: - ; LITTLE ANNIE NORPINE AAUS. TOM SMITH - (10:40 a.m.) �`�"'. . � . � Smith presented this item and stated that as a part of the � proposed Little Annie Norpine Haus proj ect, a request has been , � ` made by the applicant that the County make a trade of property � with them. There is a County owned mining claim of 2.2 acres of ' � unusual shape that intrudes into the property. It would make it '� easier for them to develop if they acquire this from the County � and are therefore proposing a trade. � BOCC needs to decide if they want to make this trade since this is property to be held for park and recreational purposes. Smith feels since this is a straight trade; and the County suffers no net loss of open space or park or recreational properties; and f the properties are of essentially equivalent value; there would ;,:':. . be no purpose served by going to election and therefore it is not - �� necessary to do it. ; Jim Mollica made presentation for applicant with maps and i pictures. Property to be traded (of equal size) is a parcel � across the road from the County owned parcel. i •) Smith asked if there was a consensus of approval among the Board , Members. All aqree with the proposed trade and all agree that it !��, " is not necessary to go to an election. Documents will be drawn y,; up. r, PIIBLIC COMMENT - (1:30 p.m.) � I . � None ,; I 1 .�_ � i � i Commissioner's Meeting 4 October 27, 1986 � ; � r. ,_`` �: � �." � ,n ° � � . � . , ..�,��,,._r.�z�:.: � .__ . .. . .. , .. --�:�:.;_ ...'� . � . ��f;aa . - . , . j� r .... .. � ��r'�''�`�"2y . ' . . � .. � . . - � � . �ti��. . . . . .. _ � � � :' ' � . � - � . ` . . Sr�= :�t'� �'':_, � .. . � ' _ . � . � . ' . . . R f � , . . . , , .. �"� � ��-"4��. ,��.� t " `'�...ai.�k a}�f:f�i . . - . � . � � . . - � � . �..��4f Sr4ti . � ' .. . . . � � - ,. .. � . . . . � ry 4 � L ' : . . . .,, ' �� Y r�.' . . , . . _, .. r �� t _ � fz,i.....: ..�i . � . *t ; i ,::..�A . ...T�Rf„ .��;,:a . / �:..... , � , � "�,,".. , . � , � �'§,tal-};S '"f��`'�` C�''3'��,slY*��`'"4�°r'y Tk`"��r� .�A� �� 34�'TaCn.E-��.`��r"F`�{ �.��yx"w� . : y � � . , . ' ._... , ,. Ti.. C...S... �.. ,.,. _..8^ .. .::,. b. �1».... .' .uKT.A.�s;�, 4rr:��. -: � ADMINISTRATION SECTION ' s � RESOLUTIONS ANp CONTRACTS - f1:45 a.m. � . Minutes of the October 14, 1986 meeting were approved as sub- � ' , mitted. 1) 1987 FAA Entitlement Grant Resolution. Ann Bowman " � This is regardinq the Capital Improvements discussed at last week's work session. Child asked about tha $150,000 for � landscaping and berms along the entrance road. Bowman said - , FAA instructed us to list everything we might want to do, � even as far as 5 years down the road. She stated that the - j landscaping and berms are a low priority. , Blake made a motion to approve resolution. Child seconded. �" �� 1 There being no further disoussion, a vote was taken. All are in favor. Motion carries. - � 2) Courthouse Attic Value Encrineerinq/General Contractor ' � Award & Aareement. Vinny Belfont Vinny Belfont, Facilities Maintenance Manager recommends �„� . that BOCC approve Resolution of Contract for Value Engineer- ¢ � i ` ing with RUDD CONSTRUCTION. This is a $5,000 contract which F: x involves the contractor going through the specifications and ' s drawings and looking for areas where cost savings might be ' found. Negotiations will continue for the General Contrac- '� '- � tor portion of the attic project. . Blake made a motion to approve resolution. Child seconded. I " . Discussion: Belfont states that the contractor for the `'�, ` attia project itself, will be chosen in approximately three ' to four weeks. There being no further discussion, a vote was taken. All are in favor. Motion carries. - 3j Procurement Code Revisions Resolution, Tom Smith .� �. . � Tom Oken, Administrative Services Director presented this item. Explained that County Attorney will do a comprehen- ��r,' � sive review of the Code and make ravisions as appropriate, next year. In the meantime, the two items covered in this : ! resolution, are to be dealt with now. �.' �1. 1) Formal bidding requirements will not be necessary i (although competition is strongly urged) until we reach �-I $10,000. � " 2) Approve use of state bids in lieu of ours. �;; �., , Commissioner's Meeting 5 October 27, 1986 � �:: \I � _ _ � �r• - �� ,�; .� � � fr,. - s''�'�'�•�-w''-::�.�y`*�`. �. �.,. .. . -t . _ ,�, . . . � �J'.+r+! "�.._��: ��."`,��f� .. , , . . , . r��s��• ... � ' .. . � . . � . . : . . ��-� � � � � � � . - -. . . AC`+"«: �� ; . . .. . . .. � .. -. . . . _. , . . . . . • SA'3��}'�. . . . � � � � � � � � , ' � . �,��'� ;� ty�?31f��_ in - . � .. � , � � . . � . . "�VY_y �: �?�4�� , . _ "�'��t�i;; �n� y ..:: . - .. . t . ',°'�^�,y r',syy . � � n r .y�,:f'j . . , �i�> � j..:.:'..:,�:'...': ' . �«�. ,N. �.�.��. ,t � . - ,�[4'�,� � . . � � .. ,. . y a� . . 7� � '. .: .. -• s . _ � ` F'-r :, . ". . ., � . . '- .�" 4.�. :. �. i k�_,�y�j � � : �. . � �3�*'"`.r�"�'._.�'�`,�"�`x 4 . ."�'...-�,.�..�'�'�`�.`�`�`-�_..``-`�.�:we.�...�.__ - }.�... __ _ . ._ ., .� .,..., . . ... .*��..:.. . . . "wi''I.LT� r.s�-s�»�u �Pit'�.� i �0�. ' � Blake made a motion to approve resolution. Child seconded. - � There being no further discussion, a vote was taken. All are � in favor. Motion carries. � 4 4) Desicmate lei New Polling Place. Loretta ,1Banner ,� s�: �; Request to designate the Church at Redstone as a polling !;. � place for Precinct 13. Child made a motion to approve +` resolutibn. Madsen seconded. There being no disaussion, a ° i vote was taken. All are in favor. Motion carries. ;= � 5) Airport Food Service License Extension, Ann Bowraan __ Gary Esary presented this item. It is a request to extend ;r�`;;� the Pour La France lease until the County is done with `'�_�' selection process. Liquor license expires on December 5th, ; 1986, if procurement process is not completed by then, Esary `�'4y. will come back before the Board for another extension. + Blake made a motion to approve resolution. Child seconded. , � There being no further discussion, a vote was taken. All are i in favor. Motion carries. � �" t a PUBLIC HEARING - RE-ISSUANCE OF SINGLS FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE , � BOIZDS HIGHLANOS VIT�,A3 AND HUNTER CREER. JIM ADAMSRI - � (2:OOP.M.) - � # Tom Smith presented this item. A reduation in interest rates for « the homeowners is expected. Negotiations have been held up and a request is made for a Special Meeting to consider this item on i ; November 17, 1986. ' ,;:':, . � � Blake made a motion to Tab7.e to November 17, 1986. Child _� `y seconded. There being no further discussion, a vote was taken. - All are in favor. Motion carries. GREG MACE COML�[+IORATIVE RESOIATION. MARIC FULLER - (2:05 p.m.) F _.'� Mark Fullez, Asszstant County Manager presented this item. This is to honor Greg Mace and proposes to name a peak in tha cast],e .� Creek Valley for him. The peak chosen to be renamed, is one `:`,�', : � known locally but not on any map, as Iron Mountain. {°i 6'. :,`, � The Board of County Commissioners unanimously, as one, made the `� ' motion to approve this resolution. A unanimous second by the Y;' . � whole Board of County Commissioners. Madsen stated that this is ; ' a privilege. All are in favor. Motion caxries. i;.- - f�:" � .. Commissioner's Meeting 6 October 27, 1986 3,?: _- �;',' i �;' � . �,� `:t.� . x � ; �.. .rr, ,;..-.�:. ..� :.t.-,'� . . . .. ._. . � ai k„+�}-,.�.,� � ,,,�:�., . �� ,�� ," _ . r ,' �"�-_ � , . �s�aY , . ��.1 x 1 ' F �:� "!'�� . � � . � . � . �s � YJ�: .' � . . . - . ..- . � ,- .. � , � , � ,�,'j� ` � � . . ` • _. � __-� ..:....:� x,,, v i . . _ . ��a �: wrt� „�,��<� F ,-r�'i ,y' .. . � I �+� A y 1 �;,.:�:�•A . ' , , ,,� . � , __.. _ _ � . � � z :i�'.��,� ,a�.t m�` �x�.e°t�'� � Ce��r��,�`t4n. _ye�.t "t��';u'�k�>�ar��'.. �.."v-j �`+,�P . .4, . `'�i_�+� '.i' .. . �!"�.., ,i�'*�'{<�tp�'�._�,4:¢..��;7J?�+Cw.'.�.. . .z . _?�'�a':.,u�f��,.e.'.'7}�..._.y,,,..b,.�'��1�....7�.. . ��'1�,��. . .--_ s � �� . � � ' � .. . FIRST READING AND SET P[JBLIC �?aR�rG: PERSONNEL MAN[7AL REVISION RECOMMENDATIONS, BILL KIPP - (2:15 p.m.) Bill Kipp, Personnel Director presented this item. He stated that the Personnel .Reyiew Board has been working on the revision of tha four chagcers included in tiiis resolution for about seven ;� � months. The ahapters recommended for revision are Chapter I, II, - _ III and IV. 'r . Kipp stated that PRS wanted to recommend a revised Sick/Disabil- ity Benefit as an additional policy. However, from a management standpoint, he states he has just begun to look at the benefits �.:`,`;: . , package would not feel comfortable at this point reoommending ado tion of this because anal sis has not been done. Ki would �� .'�'�``� P Y PP .�.,;; like to see what the actual cash outlay involves. Blake made a motion to approve tha Personnel Manual Revision �- Recommendations on first reading with the exception of the sick leave policy and set public hearing. Child seconded. There being ' no further discussion, a vote was taken. A11 are in favor. Motion carries. • ' �; ,. PUBLIC HEARING: CHANGE NAME OF A PORTION OF SPRIICE STREET TO �' � "SOUTH AVENUE", TOM NEWLAND - (2:30 p.m.) . • ' Tom presented a sheet containing signatures of all the landowners � : ; along the street. They all agree with the name change, for the , recard. fBraudis opened the Publia Hearing for comments. There being none �' ; ' this portion of the hearing was closed. t�''T� � _, ' �"� Madsen made a motion to approve. Child seconded. There being no � further discussion, a vote was taken. All are in favor. Motion , carries. j � AT THIS POINT, LEE CASSIN SPORE TO THE SOARD REGAI2DING THE l EARLIER ITEM ON PERSONNEL MANUAL REVISION RECOMMENDATIONS. LEE IS THE VICE CHAIR OF THE PERSONNEL REVIEW SOARD. 9 � ;, ( Lee stated that the PRB had been working very hard on the Manual ' ', for over one year. One of the things that PRB spent a lot of � '�' � time on was a policy for Maternity/Paternity leave. She stated � that PRB still needs to do more work on it. Kipp has given us � '` � new ideas to consider but more time is needed to review all �' � options. Cassin also stated that PRB is comfortable with omitting the =.� Disability portion of the approval until more research is � completed on options. � Commissioner's Meeting 7 October 27, 1986 � �c c'. .. � �,s_.':, _ i .. �+h'�4 r� . . ' . .. - - ' ,,,.-s+^_��' . � �'r . . . . 4 .��.,�� . ... � �'� �r �,,�, ','�,, . . �'�� , , ��a �� — . �:. �, �� -.uh .. . � . . � ' . ,�,t., *.ft� .. . . . � . � . �r�� -: .- . �; , , �eti,i,,.r' . : � ...... ..__. .., ... . ' rv3tpsxl.,�,A�, ... � . � ' . .. _- .. . ' �,� .�.�; . � - . t��.R ✓ � �?�� r !' � . � . (n,� s 'y I 1•. . - �... � V � � . � •%; ' . � ✓`a. r' .• . . . -t -.�7 . , . . � � S l( �l -: yY � fi �,�a i'° 3 � °�c' f � � a 'J i '�, t��a�,'�'1 . V� Y . � ..�a x.; x i Y...- �y y c � �r e t�.-�� .�rJ k k"L-��'f x� 1 � � � 2�` P � �� ny�y, � ��-�'Aio- a.s n��' �- �i�' p s;L��I.� . . '4- . . � ^u:;..''�.6nFl� _:r�.. �ao- . .�. �. �.��'�r. �� 't �.t�' ::y c . . . . ' . . . . . . . : �_.._. .. .�� . . � . � . � � � � � . � �� . �' Kipp stated that cafateria style benefits are being looked at and � -'� `are being given serious consi.deration. ;>1 ,j Tom Smith said that the present policies contained in the Manual Y will remain in effect until new revisions are approved at the �;;, Public Hearing on November 10, 1986. -�.._� . . �. - � . . r..,` . 5ince Tom Stephenson, Chair oE the PRB could not make this � meeting Lee shared his concern about tha proposed Ski Pass $ � Policy. That is whether this is considered a Bonus or a Benetit. John Eldert, County Manager stated that historically it had been considered a bonus. Kipp said that current manual lanquage provides it as a benefit. We might want to consider this as an �%•��''" option for the cafeteria plan. Eldert stated that the adminis- tration of the present policy is the problem. F_'�� There being no further business, Blake made a motion to adjourn ' � at 3:00 p.m. . Respectfully submitted, Pa Belfont 1' , Administrative Recards Manager � � �. � . r � � � �1 Ch��Rwo.na.� f�PP2ouE0 //-io-8 . . . .. � : .. � - � . � .. . . . . �-"�..�,l . � . � � � . . . . . .. .� . . . . . . � . - ':�Y.... . . . . '�,1.. �.,\ . _ . . . . , . � � Commissioner's Meeting 8 October 27, 1986 j + . . _.`-� � t �---..�I �` :' .. . . •saA'ySL^+� ,�' ' .�+:�:.�G' � ..,?i�+7� ,�a..l.��:�, ".1,s.:::a.-w . .._ �-�......�_�,.; . � .. � - . . - �--..�'�,`l,,.i+�,-..i., ""�.ti� .��r �fi . � . .1 . . . . . :. -.. , .: : . . �.r. . . �. . . . � � _ .. . anti,� .�: . . � . . � . . .� . � . . ' _�S'� " � � �. . � , � - � . ' �.� � � .. � ' . , , , �. .. _. � �''�� . . � � . ' . . .. � �.� - . ��,"'�a{'� � ' �° " , 'r.t� . -^ - '- ...__ . . ,� . _ ,. �C � �� . � � . . . . . ' ��ro� �'.r - I ' ' � ,� ,r3,� ��k!_„�t��'��i � � .. �'' :::s.,-r'*ry: ��k':, > . ' . ,'VF,.. �-� �4'n.. - i �^ 3' ,. , � � t > , 1� s ; � : � . 4�`f4 . `� u+Vt � t'. ' . . 3 .,.� :� . . �^ „ � Y +�: q��. r :, �; � e a . �� ' .��x�€^r Y„�>..: '�r Y . . � s:a f 2 �x J xm.-r R%��` ��«��'�r'� �� : u;, r,.°.> .,��..:.f r,rf �a�It�� '�"M vr "' '1 . . +�.a.. uz 5 t., y� 'w3..+r. - - -- - . . . "i I . . - , _ _ . "- - . . . .. _ _- ' • ' 1 � . - - -- - - - r j . _ r,cnr,n oF ca co.::,t�n�s R , i . . • �PITKIG C0. ` � ' - , . , . - . Publio Hoaring E.^chibit� j �"� ]►GENDA ITEM SDl4lARY Data :_ _�O-d"7-�� ' . ,� - - Sub�oct : i - . . . . • ' . . Fxh. No.i� ! TOs Haa=d of County Commissioners — - � . . Eiegular iYeeting -�October 27, 1986' . j ......:-; � RE: Piffer I041 Floodplain�Hazard Review I FROM: .Francis iCrizmanich, Planning Office rg�� . { � h•:,r. f =__�______==__=__=____________________________�__________==__ �= . ,i . ' �; ISSIIE: The applicants are requesting 1041 floodplain hazard �� review approval ta add an addition to aa existing house. The � house is within tkce zoninq setbacks, therefore this application • ' also zequires Board of Adjustment approval. _ '. � - ; - . . ` ;� ALTERNATIVES: � , 1 1. � Denial - The applicant will not be able to expand the • j existing residence. . � � " ; . . 2. Approval - The applicant will be able �o expand the i , existinq residence subject to the Board of Adjustment � � granting a setback variance. RECOMMENDED ACTIOH: The Planning Office recommends that the f ' Board direct the staff to draft a resolution of approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached memo. ' . �:.�r _ - . ,� - t • � ' ��., . 1 _ . . � ! . �� _ . : �.., � , r . . ; _ _ _ = , r:: -.,` _ . �;� . . �:� . o; ... . . _�_. .....a--4:-�.�...,.....:..�.s::. ��v_-i� .�. . .'. _ " ' � . — _ ...,.., ,.....:.��. .y�::.. ..��.. .�. _ ..._.. _ . . , r..�. �.. _.. .,...,. .,. , . , , . . . , � �:. �. ...:. . . . �- ' .�. . �.::. . _ . . � � .''- . . . . . - . .. .� .. - . . � .. +i, . ' . . � � � . . ' . ' �. • .. � . . . � � � � - _ � � . �� . � ,. . - , � �.-� �..":: �.., � ..��. . . . ,' . . . . ' . ' . . . . -- ��' . . . � . . . . . � �. _ , . . . �� . . � � - _. _ --�:,- . , � . , -� � n�, �G�f�.�,4� ' . . � . ' �,X�y :� . . ' � , . t 4r�r�.'ka��i� ' .. . {�._�+$Y�C t�`�''�i � . i,...�w�..,;r:t;u . ,�.;. �'t _ „_ � , �',. �, ,, ' ' . � � : '�' `� { , .�' r�.�. . : i z �., �� F f 9 r ��. n`t� : �si I ' 1� e � ' . �µ �S f � . K�sz� ,��.�.�,z ... � .,. ..� r a . 7t.� x# ��y �`.ct � Y r�i �. .. � � i ; ,�F��".'x i S� yl` a9,Z: ¢ L ”r,^r a ��i w �b�i,e�-.�«,�,''{ 7 .t 1 ..�y , .-�.•na+ein ..",L.�.G'.t .« . '�-.a-r _ _ . . ._L.�.u....,_... � ...Y.S.P' . — ; . � � . . �� . • . . - - • � ' � . _ �+ • . . I � . � . . . - . . .: . . '. ' � � . .R " . . � . . � . . � . . � . . . .. . �f f • . - . . _ . ri , single-family residence Ys permitted. Therefore, we cannot- recoimnend approval oE thi.s request. _ " - . : � In summary,� the Board•may approve the 1041 Floodplain Hazarct �''' ' Review of the main nesidence addition, but you cannot approve-the ��'�;;' . requested setback variance o= the proposed "caretaker/guest" . uni t. ' RECOtIl�NDATION: The Planning Office and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 1041 Floodplai.n Hazazd Review to the � Board of County Com:aissioners subject to the following condi- ` ' tions: . �.. . r* { 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the "��•.`�, i . applicant shall �eco=d a 24 x 36 mylar site plan which shows the buildable area of the lot outside of the 100 � yeat floodplain limits. The site plan shall be � certified bp a prof.essional engineer and shall be . approved by the County Attorney and Planning OfEice ` .prior to being recorded. . . 2. The applicant shall comply with the tecommendations of " the Enviro�ental Health Department regarding septic • ' system design and fireplaces. ' � - : . 3. The applicant shall apply to the Board of Adjustment � ;�'. • for a setback variance for the proposed house addition. � � 4. The cazetaker/guest unit request is hereby 8enied. �,- . E ;; r � FK.3 ` F _. � .. . . . . .. . . . � . t . . . . . . . .. ' . . . . . . . . ' I - . . - � � . . � � ' � � � .. � . .. � . ' . . ' .. . . . . . . . . • . � � . , .. . . � .. � , '•,��'': . . I � . � . � . . . . . � .. . . .. . I �� . . ..�.. ....� ... . ._ .. . ' . : . . . � .- ' . . . . . . . . . . � '. . 1'�� ' . . I. : . , .. ... .. - . �. � - . . . � . . �: � � I . . .. . � .. �. � � . . � � �� I�� . 1 . - . - . . �: � , . ; . : . � . . ;:� � 3 � -v�";� 5 . � . . . � .. . � . . i�;,' 1. .. -_\� ... .. . . . . . . ' . .. . . .. �_ .� '. ' � ' . . � r•: . .. �_ ; _- 'wh �...Hr:;;. ..1. ... .,.......�.,..._... ........... .......,_.... . .... : . ......,._.:. ...__. - _ . . . .�.... '�' . .. .._ �:::.... . ..... .. .� . .fi . �y�_ . . . .. .. . �`c � ..J ... � . .. .. ' . , . - . . . . � . t' . , _ � , . . . . . „ri` . .. . � � ��. . . � . . �� . ;,� .�. `.St1 � . . - . . '. � � � .. . .r^."�"4".. . ._ . . . . . . . . .. 1 . . . . '�-. .. � . .�� . : � � . . ' . . . . ;.;r,�d�� . .� . - - . � . . . . - . . .F,��,; _ � ' 'y�,�; . ., - _'. „ - N�,.�. , . . . 1 ��rV�yy ... . .' . ._ .., .. j��'fRj!�'�'r� � . . 1 . � - , . � ��;k�#ryi � i ��, i.,h y:.;.�:iJ . . � � - ��yr�.. , \ ' , � �° F . r � � / - . ; . �� . { } �r:' a . ,� i � tiFs �� fi� ', 'c [.' # y,f �1: ._ . :: t � � Z tY� �4; 9+, ,, � ,� ♦ .�• r �u � � . r - ,,+, �. . .. � �+. . �Nz�a-w+a+�c-.�:,.....�,.:....xa t� � ': ��....�_.��..,,qr y,�'.'" � >.. $ j' �'r :�., 4 r .rvx,f er�?';_'��ir�-�} K r : . . . . '_.:3..c1_.....� _ .. ,...;;awwcue.'�-..:... �'._._ - , ..�«..4:i��,4�,;T'_�_ ./!� �. � . . . . . - �• . _ • ' . � ^ .. . f . , - . . . . . • E iit C �5�.,�,�•R�S - : . . . . . . � . . . . c: . � .`� , ' • • PuU2 �.,�.. •. . :i:ciiiblEs'; ; . 21GENDA ITSH SIIMl�nItY ' Dato , ; ! , i �- � � � � ,. ;- �v:2 -� � . - ; � � . suu,o�c : �',;�,�o f� �. .-_ S • �::t,.-n�.: :._ . ! • � , TD: -Board of County Commissioners �• --�---., P . . . . . .. DAT�: Regalar Meeting - Octdber 27. 1986, . .. . . � � '�'i RE: Gibbons 1041 Floodplain Hazard Review FROM: _ F=ancis Krizmanich. Planning Office ��\� ' � I ==___°___________________________________________�_______-___= c; i ' ISSIIE: James E. Gibbops is requesting`Special Review Approval to �1 .'I construct a residence on a 22 acre parcel .which contains a mapped _ 'floodplain hazard. The applicant has committed to placing.all proposed buildings outside of the flood hazard area. ` . ;' ALTSRNATIVES: The Planning Commission and Planning staff � ' , reco�mnend approval subject to the three conditions outlined at- the end of the attached memorandum. The Board may approve� this . • project with the reco�endsd conditions or modify these condi- , ' � tions. Benial of this application .is not supported by the Land • IIse Code. • REQUlfML'NDBD ACTION: Tfie Board should direct the staft,to draft a resolution approving this application subject to the conditions outlined in the memorandum. . : ! FR.106 � . : li.._ � �. . ' . ,t, , � - � . . , , ' - , a.f. . \ � _ <� ' • I • , • - �:.': `` : . . . � �,.. �� . . . . � ' � � . ' . k-. r: ��ee-rr:�- . . ,- ,._� -�--'q"-.....'^w~ � . . _ - ��. --- ........._ __._.; .:.... ... ..._ :. ___ �� _�. _ , . . � � :�.- �s..�.�r,•w «.�"`. , ��'Tyw" � - � Ka�asa.;" , . �� . �. . . � ,. , � � .. � . �.�r tEa' _ . � . . . . _ . . .. . . . � . � . ,�#��;�':f . ;�. .. '" : ,- .__-, 'v+�.x. � _:. . • �i-'�''$5 ' � _,'--. ..,_�.:` �� _- � �fid'e�Y{4t..� . . i ��,'t7Yi\�7k1� � � . (i.K.."'.+i:'tt'`;;i'{F,L;a t .•- � r - . u , . .`��; . . - . . . . .. . . . � � . ' S _ t, i .. . h � � V .. .,.... .,��Y�:. � ,.�.. 5 .� ..�-.:.._._...�.,_.�'x..._. .� .. ____ � ._ . . - .. -. - -- .s . r.> ....... ,_.... .��. 4 . lr' - � I • � • : , .i ^ _ . _ � , _ . 1 , _ . F. . . — . . i ' this site plan has been reviewed by Wright Water Engineers ' confirming that the proposed buij.ding site is outside of the 100 � year flood boundary. • The Planninq Office recommends approval of this p=oposal if the •'�"�;'. ! recommendations nf Tom Newland are inccrpozated into the site ' plan. A building envelope should be established on the site plan - which meets zoning setbacks and is outside of the 100 year flood ,'` `, ` . boundary. This will allow the applicant to vary the buildin9 design if necessary without requiring f urther special review. In ; addition, future planned buildings such �as the barn can be constructed without furthet special =eviews. f�;;;";, ,. . . ;, , ' The site plan should also have the professional engineer's . f�'�`.�'' certification and seal affixed to it so that future questions regarding the floodplain wi11 not arise. rY. �� The Planninq Office also recommends that the applicant comply � with the recommendations of the Envitonmental Health Department. . _ RECOI�NDATZON: The Planning Office and the Planning Commission ( tecommend that the Soard of County Commissione=s grant 1�41 ` • Floodpl ain Hazard Review approval to the applicant subject to the �h r s f ollowing conditions: . . ` , 4 . . � ; ' � 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits,. the . � , agplicant shall record a•24 x.36 mylar site plan which shoWS the buildable portion of the property outside of the 100 year floodplain limits. 3'he site plan shall be� , . ceLtified by a professional engineer and shall be t.� approved hy the County Attorney and Planning Office 4:`, , prior to being recorded. • . . . , ..; . . . " 2.. The applicant shall wmply with the recommendations of the Enviro�ental Health Department reqardin9 septic ,' system design, fireplaces and open burning f or agricul- tural opeLations. L,� ' _ 3. � -The applicant shall perf orm ahemical and bacterio- .i lagical testing of the well to be submitted for " � � approval of the Environmental Health .Departnent prior ��,. . to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the f; `� � residence. . FR.4 � . : `�S . � 3 , --- . . . _ ' . (_ � - � �. �,,�, _._ r, _. ___. _. _ ----- - --- , � ,. _ �� f�x r- ;� - � .� � . . • . ... � . r�"i�+p.'� . � �� . � . ' . �,�,�`r4 {�' . ��,�bt�, � _ ��,:. , ��,�;�, ... � , �,« '+�'�, y,^a y+ ; ��r��' �Y� { ; ;. iat;t ra; .. '� .__ �..�.....� L X� � . � I � ... � .._� . r�^ . � y .:.y "��`F.i�. � . . . . . [� �'1� ,; . pt'W:� a � . . � , . . 5 r i f �t i• tY, ° . . � .��,... ... � . . . � . . . . ..._ .. ._ . ! �7 1 � ��c t �w 3y,.,F . f . . � �� ,,�u�t�cr��..<-'r.7.re"r�*y��,j+'�' �'3 �+� � i- �-^ ' is+�"M:ia, r � i�c.aw"'t>r t� "'.ffiy"z' .�l.v`tctm:. -"��1�..o4�4s"�:3��"t��'P�, z .. �:-�.r.��Y....ry�,..�. �.�.r.�.uAth�.7i.��2. '��'r't.��Y2 . _ ___ tiS . , . -�a�:� . � pitkir� county , � �; AGF�DA ITEH SUMMARY DATE: BOCC Reqular Meeting of Octoher 27, 1986 j. TITLE: Pour La France! Airport Food and Beverage Operation License Extension ��' . �.�.,� ' ?. � STAFF: Bowman/Esary��c. �� BACKGROIIDTD/ISSIIE: The Pour La France! Airport Food and Beverage • � License expires on October 31, 1986 and a competitive bid process �`� for the new concession term has been underway. The License ' � � ,� Agreement for the new Licensa term was saheduled to have been ',:1 approved today. Because of problems in the bid process, a bid � :`''j opening extension has been granted until November 3, 1986. Staf£ • - expects to bring a recommendation and new license agreement in at ; � the Regular Meeting of 23ovembeZ� 10, 1986. Until that time, Pour La France! needs an official license extension to support its liquor license and to continue opera- tions until it wins a renewal or a new operator is chosen and _�=;:i installed. r ��:� As an aside, bid interest in this concession is high and several "! local restaurant operators and at least one national airport food ",: "°� service operator are expected to bid. �.i j ACTION NEEDED: Approve a motion granting Pour La France! a � license to continue to occupy the Airport space and operate the I:� food and beverage service on a month-to-month basis or until a new License Agreement for an Airport Food Service Operation is signed and the new operator (or Pour La France!, if renewed) is ;,j installed, upon the same terms and conditions as its present . , Agreement. ' ` , GSE:cd •�� ; County Commissioners County Attomey Personnel and Finance Road and Bridge ��' SWte B Suite I SWte F Fleet Managemant �� 506 E.Main Slreet 530 E.Main Sireet 530 E.Main Stree[ 20210 W.Highway 82 ��_ . �.^ Aspen,CO 81611 Aspen,CO 81671 Aspen,CO 81611 Aspen,CO&t 611 � . � (303)925-5232 (303)920-1223 . (303)925-3166 (303)925•7212 ' �' .; � ��•_r,� ii:��.- ..�.�:�: �.`-.: - .,. .. .. ,_ , _:...� ...:. a � .. �� .� � .. . .. . , . . . , ...r.. . . _ . . 9 �s�,�,�� . .. . "�JO.ys`z�y��- �� 1� ` . . . . . , � . . . . . ,. � . � . �� . � ' .. � .. . . �� . .. . �� . . . - . � . . - .�. . . �'r-t �-t��,�sr� : . , . . - . . . . . . . � � . ' � . �,guu '„yy,rTi..,7's f , . . . . . . . �"*s+-�,rx�;: �� 3a i , � . }y��.. � . , . - .. . ._-�. . . ... " . �. •,;... ...._ .. � � :'�'?a,. �}:i � . . l��n`tc4�Y h-i � . � . I . f3it :�`w = � . . . _ �� / ��v', hf.��{ f' 'y`.:;.i::�:`I��. . 1986 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING EXHIBITS October 27 James E.Gibbons 1041 A Memorandum Dated October 27, 1986,from Francis Floodplain Hazard Krizmanich,Planner,to Board of County Commissioners Review B Memorandum Dated August 26, 1986,from Bob Nelson, Department of Envzronmental Health,to Francis Krizmanich, Planner C Land Use A lication Submitted b James E.Gibbons D Stipulation Regarding Order of Partition,Richard P.Fitzgerald, Plaintiff,vs. Ste hen L.Main and James Gibbons,Defendants E Letter Dated July 10, 1986,from Jim Gibbons to Pitkin County Plannin Office F Letter Dated June 26, 1986,from Paul S.Bussone,P.E.,Wright Water En ineers,to Jim Gibbons Piffer 1041 Floodplain G Memorandum Dated October 27, 19$6,from Francis Hazard Review Krizmanich,Planner,to Board of Coun Commissioners H Letter Dated July 9, 1986,from Charles Larry Piffer re: Piffer Residence � I Letter Dated June 2, 1986,from Timothy P.Beck,High Country En ineerin ,to Frank Harrin ton, Scarrow and Walker,Inc. J Memorandum Dated August 21, 1986,from Bob Nelson, Department of Environmental Health,to Francis Krizmanich, Planner Request for Street K Memorandum Dated October 9, 1986,from Tom Newland, Name Planning Engineer,to Board of County Commissioners Confirmation/Change— South Avenue Initiated b Stan Lauriski L Petition in Support of Name Change of Smuggler Mountain Road to South Avenue "" � �t: . ;'_ ,! - , :E t 4 35 a�r - . " " " L�!_;." i.:. ,- ;'Ii'S - - T; . _ ' � . r'IL2�� EXHIBIT � ' • - Dato � . � I�!lORANDUM - • SuUjea ' ' E�:h. Ii 'a' — : T0: Pitkia County Board of County Commissioners -��- - • � •�•- ••-.��:.-; - FROM: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office RE: Gibbons 1041 Floodplain Hazard Review DATE: October 27 , 1986 ---------------------------------------- --- - APPLICANT: James E. Gibbons. RBQUSST: The applicant is requesting 1041 special review approval to construct a 3 ,000 square f oot resi dence, 900 square f oot garage and 900 square foot barn on a 22 .3 acre parcel which contains mapped floodplain hazards. SONIPG: The property is zoned AF-1 and is a legal conforming lot. LOCATION: The property is located on the north side of the Roaring Fork River approximately 2 miles east oE Old Snowmass. i�IATBR: Water is proposed to be supplied by a well. � SBWBRs An on-site septic system is proposed to serve the residence. . ACCgSS: Access will be via private drive onto the Lower River � Road. � MAJOR ISSUSS AND CORCBRPS: I. Referral Agency Comaents 1. Snvironmental 8ealtb Department - In a memo dated August 26 , 1986 (attached) , Bob Nel son submitted the following comments: o Water Supply : We recommend bacteriological and chemical tests of the water quality once the well has been completed. This should be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occu- pancy for the residence. o Sewage Di sposal: The appl icant proposes to treat wastewater by means of an engineered mound absorp- ti on system due to anti cipated high ground water conditions on the site. It is our opinion that a County permit to construct this type of system can �m - . �`�` ---------__ ___---- - ----=--=---. .__.:�. ___. . . . _ -•w,j�_r -.. be issued if this project is granted approval. o Water Quality: The development proposal is small - . and there shauld not be any significant water quality impacts resulting from the proposal. Care � should be taken with drainage to prevent the barn. and corral from draining toward the well or into the river. o Air Quality: The development is in an area where one woodstove and an unl imi ted number of wood- stoves are currently perma.tted. Limiting the structure to one fireplace in the residence would conf orm to thi s regul ati on. The applicant should be aware of requirements to obtain a burning permit for this type of small agricultural operation. No particular problems should exist with this proposal if fireplace construction is limited and open burning only occurs as detailed during the summer months. 2. County Planing Sngineer: In a �memo dated September 8 , 1986, Tom Newland submitted the following comments: AFter reviewing the applicant ' s submission I am satisfied that the proposed building envelope is mostly removed from the 100-year floodplain. Three points of concern should be cleared by the applicant before the County approves this 1041 Floodplain review: 1) The building envelope should be defined in such a manner as to el imi nate the 100-yea r fl oo dpl ai n from within it' s limits, � 2) The letter from Wright Water Engineers statiny - . that the proposed development is removed from the 100-year floodplain should be stamped with the seal of a certified professional engineer. 3) The barn is not designated on the site map. This barn should i�e placed so it is removed from the 100-year event. II. STAFF CO!!!!SP?S: The applicant is requesting 1041 special review approval to construct a residence, garage and barn on a 22 .3 acre property which contains mapped floodplain hazards. The applicant has submitted a site plan and survey showing the � proposed house location and floodplain boundary. In addition, , 2 -,t� ' � . _ . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . ..._..._..... ._ .._ �r^._._ '1. .`r.. -,. ... ... .. . _ . .. �Y..a^A. ...... 'r.-y. -.-)� thi�s site plan has been reviewed by Wright Water Engineers confirming that the proposed bui�.ding site is outside of the 100 year flood boundary. - The Planning Office recommends approval of this proposal if the � recommendations of Tom Newland are incorporated into the site plan. A bnilding envelope should be established on the site plan which meets zoning setbacks and is outside of the 100 year flood boundary. This will allaw the applicant to vary the building design if necessary without requiring further apecial review. In adc�ition, future planned buildings such �as the barn can be constructed without further special reviews. The site plan should a].sa have the professional engineer ' s certification and seat affixed to it so that future questions regarding the floodplain will not arise. The Planning Office also recommends that the applicant camply with the recommendations of the Envi=onmentai Health Department. REQOliIl�NDATIOP: Th e Pl anni ng Of f i ce and th e Pl anni ng Comm i ssi on recommend that the Board of County Commissioners grant 1041 Fl oodpl ai n Haz ard Review approval. to the appl icant subj ect to the f ollowing condi tions: 1. Prior to the issvance o� any building permits, the applicant shall record a 24 x 36 my].ar site plan which shows the buildabl.e portion of the property outside of the 100 year floodplain limits. The site pZan shall be_ . certified by a professional engineer and shall be approved by the County Attorney and Planning Office prior to being recorded. ' 2. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the Environmental Health Department regarding se�ptic system design, fireplaces and open burning for agricul- tural operations. 3. -The applicant shall perform chemical and bacterio- logical testing of the well �o be submitted for approval of the Environmental t�ealth Department prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occnpancy for the residence. FR.4 3 �,ti, • _ _ . _ . ... ._._.. ...�._.._.._. � . , : - . . � - ' ASPEN+PITKIN - . E:,.',.;:� ;�' ,;'•• • :;'S �� ' ' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH �EPARTM F'''-� ' �`'''� EXHIBIT • _ - . � Date y � - . Sub3 if —� M E M O R A N D U M �Y'• _. . . ., � , TO: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office - FROM: Bob Nelson, Department of Environmental Health DATE: August 26, 1986 . RE: Gibbons 1041 Hazard Review Parcel ID #2467-250-00-562 Case # 038A-86 • ---------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- • This department has reviewed the recently forwarded general submission application for compliance with Colorado Department of Health Regulations, local requirements, and those specific � sections of the Pitkin County Land Use Code under our jurisdic- � tion. We present the following review comments for your consid- eration regarding the referenced proposal: . l. WATER SUPPLY Water is to be supplied from a well to be. constructed on the � property. The household use well is proposed to be a total o€ i100 feet deep, with a maximum pumping rate of 15 gallons per minute. This should be a satisfactory drinking water source, � although quantity and guality should be checked before the water I. is placed into use for a drinking water source and periodically iverified thereafter. We recommend bacteriological and chemical � tests of the water quality once the well has been completed, ele�tricity run to the well, the pump set, and the system purged for about a week's time. This could be completed as a condition of the certificate of occupancy. ; . � We note that there is no information in the application that i would indicate that a groundwater source of adequate quantity and ; acceptable quality can be developed. Further, treatment of the � well water to meet standards may be required as the area where ( . the weZl most likely would be located has historically been used 1 as a livestock corral. In the past, it has been our experience ithat groundwater underZying these types of areas often cannot , meet bacteriological standards without trea�ment. We suggest ' that the site planning incorporate a design which locates the well as far as possible from all sources of pollution, including �� the barn and adjoininq septic systems. � 2. SEWAGE DISPOSAL The application indicates that the wastewater will be disposed of • by means of an engineered mound absorption system. The owner has = .. , 130 8outih O�Is�� Btreet . . Aapsn� Colorsdo 876'H . 303/'925-2020 • , �.��';'.�. - �� '�:. . .p�r� r �'�•�,,.: . ?�e..�.%:._ �.�. . �'��i.d'.ut ...� . .... ' . ' . . ... �. . - .. . . �. _.� � ,.�.+„r,;_., _. __ -- . ��. � . ._.. . _ ... . .. ..__.. .. . . .. . ' r ,. . . .... .._..... . . ..... . .. . .. ....-� _.... ...... ._........, _.......:.. ., ... _ . . . . . ... . ... , ..t .. .,...., . . .. . , - ' ' " River Road Ranch Residential GMP � ' � � - August 19, 1986 . Page 2 . been advised- by this department that, while such systems have . provided a suitable alternative to the anticipated high ground water� situation, to construct such a system is an expensive alternative requiring site-specific engineering design. However, it is our opinion that a county permit to construct a septic tank-mound filter absorption sysi.em for this residence can be issued if this project is granted approval. It is a relatively proven type of onsite wastewater disposal system, provided it is installed outside the floodplain boundary. The house ta the east on an adjoining parcel has a similar sewaqe disposal system design. 3. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS � The development proposal is small, and there should not be any significant water quality impacts resulting from the proposal. Care should be taken that the barn and corrals da not drain toward the well or into the river. 4. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS The development is in an area of the County where currently one • fireplace and an unlimited number of wood stoves are permitted.� . ' Limiting the structure to one fireplace in the main house would \ conform to this regulation. �t The applicant should be aware o€ requirements to obtain a burning permit from this office for this type of small agricultural . operation, and selectively burn only limited amounts of fhe area under his control each day and only under ideal summer weather conditions to minimize this anticipated impact. No particular problems should be evident from thi.s proposal if fireplace + construction is limited and open burning only occurs as detailed during the summer months. • I. _ � I . . r 'S' '.+ ,�:; _ . . . . : • . . " •r,�.�f:y �r t��`'�t.w'fr"4 .. . ,y�t . ..e � .... �. .... '. �7- r.i? 1 yy . . �/��, . 'f . .� �y�(�'�,� t� i. �� . . _ :y�C •jL ��T,�,._, . '7 •ti:sAL'7-Ya:r..:•.'..!v.��rf..f:� pa�r.ti� .. ..�:.. .�- . � ' - . .. . , . ro .7��.�..:N r �.f. ri�:_'_. . •. r _t ' .. ---u-- .�,..Y...�.�........�,.�.�. � , �:z . _ ._ . � � APPENDIX a : �a�.�:� oF Co. CO!�L11'R'S � ' Yr?:;IN CQ. � ' Project Number = FL`•�.+ . jrc,� . . Section/Parcei � . D<'�i . . Date Submitted su•�.i �� . , � Q-'7-� pi�k:iri . . - � 506 east main"st'�eet LAND USE APPLICATION aspen, colorado 8161'i TO 3E COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT: NAME �Tame� E Gi bbonG ADDRESS 1474 Silver King Drive Aspen, Colorado 81611 PNONE H 925-4040 O 925-6750 NAMfE OF PROJECT THE GIBBONS RANCH PROJECT LOCATION: (On attached sheet, locate on zoning map, showing boundaries of any natural hazard and resource areas, any other special regulatory districts, Section 5, Land Use Code; and locate on appropriate CSU/ ERA Maps any areas not covered by the above.) ' TOTAL AREA 22•3 Acres EXISTING USE(S) Horse Pasture and riding area, corrals. � PROPOSEO USE(S) Single Family Home, Two car garage and Barn. (approximate square . footaqe for each) 3000 sq. foot Home, 900 sq.foot Garage and 900 sq.Barn � PRESENT ZONING OF SITE. AF 1 � DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE PROPOSAL Build one Single Family Home and Barn in the � future on land presently used for corrals, leaving the pasture land . for the Horses. TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING OFFICE TYPE OF APPLICATION: REZONING GROWTH MANAGEMENT ' P.U.U. SUBDIVISION SPECIAL REVIEW EXEMPTION BUILOING PERMIt REViEW 35-acre + SUBDIYISION • REVIEW PNASE: PRE-APPLICATION pATE COMPLETEO GENERAL SUBMISSION P.C. ACTION . OATE . BOARO ACTION - OATE - OETAILEO SUBMISSION P.C. ACTION DATE BOARO AC7ION DATE • - �...,. ... •� � �nen.. •rT��u . ne�rr .. ... .. ...... ,. ,_. . ...,.�. . .... .-,.-. _ _ . . _.._ ...._. . . �..' � , ,.._.�, - �_ ---- � _ . . .. . ..'- •.Jim Gibl�n��s _ � � Aspc:n Riv�r l��ill�y Rancl� .;�J EXHIIIIT A Lot 12, Parcel C � � � . ��Y J �T/7. :1 ' ' • � BOAP,D G . �02.Ud'R'S lJut1••�.1'��lJ'::L -;•r.: •.. C�. "Z� � �J�J.:I_`i " Public TI• �.�. ; .*;:�ibit8 � Data �U�a�7`��t . 5ub�oc ..G-l-�'6'O.��a'�� 'l1 . - I_ J /�=�UJ� . ,� `� I � t= ��,;�. cac.nn��o UTL= t:%.L•"CTR.tC FA��lENT i �1��` �.` ; o� �`,� �`.. x A!' B TH. 71 ; • �•� ` . ' °Ri ��. �� cn� �---- i. �� t� '•� �• �UQ —.--.—��22 p7 � i �N �f) ��. �4� 999.65' . � �� 1 � i� �'-tio � _, � � `, ``` � � '� ` x � � � t � �'�. . `` �'� �'.�G o°;h a � Fitzgerald t�� ain ```'�aS ��o �:. Itl • , Q• '•�•,• j (� �.. - �2 �`D , Q v c� � �� Q n��. � �� G�V o; �, :: �}' �CCESS S FiJON37' �'i vrt�fT , SJU"OU 'UU"E � _ ._ 1�y, y �'-7SF v ��0 �S•;,'=°r='J'•f'�� '1.,� � �� h CpL;VTY�^;,�ti�r�`` ` �O �0 �S'p'O . ��✓ �� .i �0 �Y b as ��_ '` � yti s� ` v9 '9GY,qr � '_ ti�Cf_ �� • � 'c71✓ � � �`��6 v� - z v • W N �7 �., �- N �s ..U��''•W • , C IN£ U�'AfT1'NG Ol'�)'ANC.:' . "' �'� � 1 N7�J'OD'14"W 1ll?_. �J r 4� • 2 ✓�J�J� '38'l� ;�fJ.00► • ''` � �� 3 S33•03'47'H 33•J.•73 ' ` "� U 4 N 0•OD'OB"E 3J9.�:'. � . u� �'i :i N!4•P�'43'A' 31. 1�� . • � - � . � ----�-�-- ��. ____...,� - .�.�.�.�. - +�. � _ _.. _. __. _ .. _ __ . ... . . ..,,w,._ . ......... . .... _..,... :.:..:�-.--,-�,:-.,�,.,�s,,.�.,�..�. i � . � . --,--•_.._ � r071I;D C�:' . .. - ;'s 1 . _ • ' - Pl�i• �f � pllU7.�C H�::'�.� . ' Date . DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF C0�2�8Adx0: � �a�,,� Case No. 85 CV 226 Fxh. No.: � . , �,,. • . . STIPULATION REGr�RDING ORDER OF PARTITION RICHARD P. FITZGr.RALD, " Plaintiff, vs. STEPHEN L. M7�,IN and JAMES GIBBOI�S, Defendants. � This stipulation is nade and entered into by and betjaeen the ; above-named Plaintift and L�efendants and the Board of County � Commissioners of Pitkin County, Intervenors. Al1 parties hereby ` request that the Court enter an Order of Paztition in accordance ,� c�rith the Partition Agreement and the Addendum thereto dated October 25, 1985 subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation. I. That the division of iand contemplated in the Partition -'s Aqreement be and is e�:empt from the definition of a "subdivision" or "subdivided lands" as set forth in 30-28-101 (10) (a) C.R.S. by virtue of the operation of 30-28-101 (10) (c) (II) C.R.S. ; 2. That Defendants Main and Gibbons sha11, within 10 days ' after the entry of an Order of Partition herein, file with the ; Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder a restriction aqainst further ; subdivision of Parcels B and C, as described in the Partition � Agreement, which restriction shall constitute a covenant and deed i • restriction running with the land and shall be enforceable by � Pitkin County, 3. That an application for a builcTing permit for a single family dwelling and allowab2e accessory uses� on Parcel C shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 5--501 of the Pitkin County Code (Growth Management Quota System) . Parcel B shall not be so exempt from Growth Managment. No representation is mac�e, and no rights are waived by the garties hereto, with respect to the applicabil.ity of the Growth Management Regulations with regard to Parcel A, which issue mnst be resolved prior to the issuance of a bulding permit. _ �.. ,�r� �a.1.� , ., . . . . :.... .;,_. . ... .., .. ; . __ .__. �....,__ , .�. . :--- ., ,,.-.,. . .. ,�•,.:.�- .,,..:�...,._. ,. ._ ' _ . - - Y ' t.�• ��' . � ' * . .� i � 4. That prior to the issuance of a building permit for a � single family residence on Parcels A, B or C, the then owner thereof shall demonstrate, in addition to the foregoing and to the satisfaction of the Pitkin _ County Buildzng Department, - compliance with the following: � (a) Adequate access as de£ined in Section 6-3.2 (b) of the Pitkin County Code. (b) That new roads or driveways prov�ding access to any single family home are designed to comply with applicable Pitkin County Road Standards. (c) An adequate water supply as required b� the provisions of 18-2.5 (b) (4) of the Pitkin CountS� Code_ (d) Ari adequate individual sewage disposal slstem as required by the provisions of I8-2.5 (b) (5) of the Pitkin County Code. � (e) Compliance with Section 5-400 of the Pitkin County Code for any.-develogment within a geologic hazard area, a flood plain hazard area, a wildfire hazard area, a wildlife habitat area, or an historic and archeological resource area, as those terms are defined in said section. � °� 5. That Pitkin County hereby waives any objection �that it may � have • to the determination that the division of land � contemplated in the Partition Agreement and the Addendum thereto is exempt from the definition of subdivision as described above provided that the provisions of this Stipulation affecting Parcels B and C are adhered to. • . Dated: / �-Qj `^�_ � . � .��`�'' ' .-� `�`�- ----------•- � � r . . CiW�\ Ri�hard P Fitzgerald St �e L. Main , ��- L.�"'G''�''�`"��-'� BOARD �F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS J es Gibbo s ' �� „ , B�_ � �,.J`-�-- Chairman . _2- � , , __ ...__ .�._.. �..: ' ... - ,�. � - �,o;�r,n :oF-CO. co?�;.t��s . ,j'., , . _ PITICIN C0. . - - Publ�o HenrinE T:�hibita i . Dato : ' � Sub3oct ��_ 1�a7—�G � ... � � Exh. No� 720 E. Durant ' ' � - - Aspen, Colorado 81611 � ' ± July 10, 1956 � Pitkin County Planning Office 506 E. I�4ain Street Aspen, Colorado 81G1I Re: 1040 Hazard Review for Floodplain Special Review Approval to Construct Residence To �Vhom It DZay Concern: This letter is written to describe the proposed project to be constructed on Lot 12, Parcel C of the Aspen River ValleS- Ranch. See Exhibit A for the legal description. On January 31, 1986, this parcel of land tvas divided by parti- tion by court order with the approval of th� Board of County Conunis- sioners of Pitkin County. ;� Certain stipulations were required by the Board of Commissioners that the owner of the properties must meet prior to issuance of a building permit. See stipulations regarding Order of Partition. Part of this stipulation (4) (e) calls �or eompliance �a�ith Section 5-400 of the Pitkin County Code for an�r development aithin a geologic hazard area, a wildfire hazard area� a wildlife hazard area, or an historic and archeological resource area, as those terms are defined in said section. Since my development on this parcel is going to be a single family home tha�' is definitely not going to be located �vithin any of the hazard areas mentioned� I feel that the compliance has definitely been met. !dy architect has placed the home on the plans, the surveyor has located the �building site on the enclosed certified survey, and a letter from {Vright Water Engineers, Inc. who pre- pared the floodplain report for Pitkin County stating the fact that the house is not located in the 100-year floodplain. �Vhat more � proof can be needed? This is not an arbitrary issu� of the Cade to be discuss2d, It is either within the floodplain hazard or it is �i not. I am not tryin� to do something devious and/or trying to get ` away �vith something illegal. I only want what is right and just � according to the Code--no more, no less. , � i �' Continued. . . . i � � � " r i� � � •,...._...,-��...:.._ . . _. M -..,.. _ . __ _ _ ._ .. __._ _. .__. , _ �/`i . . � - � • Page Two - Letter to Pitkin County Planning Offi.ce July 10, 198G � � . � I would be remiss in my duty as u citizen and as a person if I didn't say somethin� about your interpretation of the Code in my application for a building permit. I find myself in an exercise of frustration, one felt by ma.ny people of Aspen in the same situa- tion, one that is causing unnecessary, costly and time consumin� work for both the applicants and the Planning and Zoning Department. They could and should be using their valuable and expensive time on more important matters than arbitration as to �vhether a building site is in or out of a floodplain area. Please give this your con- sideration. 1Yith this in mind I submit the following information on the proposed project as p�r the application requirement: (1) A three-bedroom single family liome with garage is to be built immediately with plans for a barn in the future. (2) The bniZdings will definitely not be located within 36 feet of the 100-year floodplain. 5ee survey, house plan and letter. (3) The water supply will be handled by digging a private well on . � Iand. Application is being processed by the State of Colorado. (4) Sewage disposal shall be the mound-type septic as suggested by Bob tdelson of �the Environmental Health Department. � (5) Access shall be off Lower River Road, adjacent to property 2ine. See Road Encroachment Permit approved by Pitkin County Engineer. It will cause no undue impact on the existing county road. (6) The home will be nestled in a treed area and blocked off from Highway 82 by tall pines and thick hushes to keep scenic quality control. Please take my comments in a constructive manner, as I have lived and worked in the Aspen valley for nearly seventeen years and have seen and advocated the healthy pro�ress in controling growth during this period. It is my desire to comply with the Code and let the Code work for us. Thank you for any considera�ion given this application and your coopera- tion in expediting your approval in the swiftest manner. Tf you have any further questions of ine, please feel free to contact me at r�y office (925-6750) at your convenience. Thank you. Sincerely, , ti-►-� GQ—�-,rss-�-._ im Gi�ons JG:jm Encls. � : , . ,,� _ . . . • . iiiir� � � � � /D`�7-�'(0 � Wright Water'Enginee►s,lnc. i DENVER OFF{CE TULSA OFFICE GLENWOOD SPRtNGS OFFICE � 2490 West 261h Ave.,Suite 55A 707 5outh Houston,Suite 302 818 Colorado Avenue " Denver,Colorado 8021 i Tulsa,Oklahoma 74127 P.O.Box 219 (303)480-17d0 (918)584-7136 Glenwood Springs.Colorado 81602 •(30�3)945-77.SS"--_... •., � Denver Direct line:893-1 GOS ' June 26, 1986 RO��F� OF C0. C01.!�.t'P•5 PTTKIN C0. - FubZic Hoaring E�.nibits M[. Jim Gibbons Dnto ;: .I_�"c�7—�� 1470 Silverking Drive � G'�,�y� ��( Aspen, CO 81611 sub oct' .= Re: Floodplain Review for Sinqle Family Residence Dear Mr. Gibbons: � ; At your request, Wright i�later Engineers conducted a .review of your plans for a single family residence in Aspen River Valley Ranch in Pitkin County, Colorado with respect to the Roaring �'ork River Floodplain. Z'he location map prepared by Harold W. Johnson, Registered Land Surveyor, dated April 19, 1986, which you provided, showed the proposed house situated on a parcel of land located in Tracts 70, 71 & 72, TBS, R86W. �or our review, we also relied upon a location drawing for the Gibbons Residence by Contractor and Architect John Olson. The floodplain definition which we used was that presentec3 in the Floodplain Tnfornration Repoct, Roaring Fork River-Aspen to Basalt prepared for Pitkin County and the Colorado Water Conservation Board by Wright McLaughlin Engineers @ated August, 1976. The plans and drawings show the proposed house to be located at approximately River Station 293+00. A comparison of the location drawings and Plate 6 of the Floodplain 7[nformation Report indicates that the house is not within the 100-year floodplain. The floodplain report shows a 100 yea�lood water surface elevation at this station of the Roaring Fork River to be approximately 6,953 feet (Plate 21 of Floodplain Information Repoct). We recommend that the lowest floor elevation of the house be no lower than 6,955 feet. ; it is ovr opinion that the Gibbons' Residence, as shown on the referenced � drawings and constructed at a grade elevation of 6,955 feet above mean sea level, will not be within the 100 year floodplain. Very tru2y yours, WRIGHT WATER EtVGINE�RS, INC. I ��.�� i BY �crGLGC. �j��1�1 i E'./�'/j'� ' Paul S. Bussone, P.E. PSB/emb 861-027.Q70 ;; . . .� _ _,, . _ ..�.. . . _..., .... .. . .i _ . - � .. - _ . . ' _ ' ' ' 4 ' _ .' " ��:'.:..i) �ll.' �'.�a �QL�i�t�R�j ' - - _ - _ � rzTxzx co. � r::�it� Fr . � - Pu�o - . � MBliOR1�1Nm1+1 Sub3ect • _ ��"7�"�` . £xL. .No. - T0: Pitkin County Board of Coeutty Commissioners � � FROM: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office RE: Piffer 1041 Floodplain Hazard Review DATE: October 27 , 1986 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICI�NTS: Charles L. and Ronea R. Piffer. RBQUEST: The applicants are requesting 1041 floodplain hazard . review approval to add an approximately 200d square foot adc�ition to an existing residence. The applicants have also requested to - convert an existing garage to a guest unit as well as a variance to lot setback requi rements. 80ildING: RS-30. The property is a legal non-conforming (as to lot size) parcel of approximately 7 acres. LOCATION: The property is located at 0353 North Thomas Road, approximately 5 miles south af Carbondale along the eastern bank of the Crystal River. " WATBR: Water is supplied to the exfsting residence from the Nettle Creek treated water pipeline which supplies Carbondale. SEWER: The residence has an existing septic system. ACCSSS: Access is via private drive anto the North Thomas Road. !lA.7'OR ISSi18S ANb QOAC6RI�S: I. Refer-ral Agency Comm�ents: � 1. Env f ronmental Heal th Departaent - In a mem o date d August 21, 1986 (attached) Bob Nelson submitted the � following commen�s: '• o Water Supply: Water is supplied to this residence . from the Nettle Creek treated water pipeline ; supplying the City of Carbondale. Quality and quantity are sufficient to continue to meet the needs of this proposal. . _ � o Sewage Disposal: The existing residence has some ; sort of on-site wastewater treatment system, but at this point we are not in a position to comment on its construction or whether it complies with A ��_ v W.,..__......._.._._ ivs�wP . . .�.....-..._..,.._....._.�..._._..-_..._� Ai . . � . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . . ...... .. . ... ... . . . ..':'..-::' .__ ._.. _ � Pitkin Cour�ty Regulations. We anticipate that " additional &ewage syst�n capacity will be required . - to serve the proposed addition an� the "caretaker" . unit. Any_ future on-site sewage trea�ment -system _ can be constructed to Pitkin County standards, o Air Quality: Existing air pollution regulations permit only one fireplace for each dwelling unit. The applicant should consider the installation of an appraved woodburning, stave as i.t is permitted under the current regulations. 2. County Planning Engineer - In a memo dated September 8 . 1986, Tom Newland submitted the following comments: "I have reviewed the applicant' s submission and am satisfied that the proposed building envelApe is removed from the 100-year floodplain. Timothy Beck, a certified professional engineer, has stated within the submission that no adverse effects to the 100 year floodplain will result from development within the applicant's proposed building envelope. It is interesting to note that the applicant has formally designated a building envelope only to place a majority of the proposed construction within the setbacks surrounding this envelope. " II. 5TAF'F COlQlSPTS: The applicants are requesting 1041 flood- '" plain hazard review approval to add an approximately 2 ,000 square foot addition to an existing residence and to construct an approximately 2 ,000 square foot barn. The applicants have submitted a site plan with survey points showing the buildable portion of the lot which is outside of the 100 year floodplain limits. Since the flooc3plain will not be intruded upon by this development, we find it to be an acceptable activity. The Planning staff had originally informed the applicants that the Planr�ing Commission conld grant a setback variance based on Section 3-8.12 of the Land IIse Code. We have since realized that this provision applies to R-30 zoned properties, not RS-30. Therefore, the applicant will be required to apply for a setback variance to the Board of Adjustment rather than to the Planning Commission. The applicants have also requested to convert the existing garage to a "guest" or "caretaker" unit. According to the Land Use Code, detached caretaker or guest units require twice the acreage of the underlying zone district. Since the zoning for this pr ope r ty i s RS-3 0 , an addi ti onal detached dwel l ing uni t woul d - require 60 acres. Because the subject property is approximately �` 7 acres in a zone district which requires 30 acres, only a 2 � �.. . , :._..,1 ._ ._ ...:.. _..,,., , ...... _, .- _..,.,_,. ...,. ..._._... . _�. .. ._ .. . __._... .__.. . .._ ...., ...- K...,...,. _,.. . :,�.:��..�.�.�....,__ .�_ __. . ._ .... , ._...« e�:.•�, - ' - - - - - . � single-family residence is permitted. Therefore, we cannot• recommend approval of this request. _ : In summary, the Board �may approve the 1041 E'loodplain Hazard Review of the main residence addition, but you cannot approve'the requested setback variance or the proposed "caretaker/guest" � uni t. RE(70l4�PD�ATIOIQ: The Planning Office and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 1041 Floodplai.n Hazard Review to the Board of County Commissioners subject to the following condi- tions: 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record a 24 x 36 mylar site plan which shows the buildable area of the lot outside of the 100 year floodplain limits. The site plan shall be certified by a professional engineer and shall be approved by the County Attorney and Planning Office prior to being recorded. 2. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the Environmental Health Department regarding septic • system design and fireplaces. 3. The applicant shall apply to the Board of Adjustment for a setback variance for the proposed house addition. + 4. The caretaker/guest unit request is hereby denied. FK.3 3 i � ------ . . . _ . . _.__�._._�__----_._, _;�. ..._�. .. . ...__.._..__...r ,,._._......_.__....___ ..__..._... . --,� _ _ .,_ ..._�_..�..._. .._.� , ' . - ' _ . � . � c. co. co:..r.t�a,,s - . rrT;�;.x co. . � - . ._.��.wo . � _ . � . .;at o FI FFEE'i RESI DEt�GaE - Subsoct �D�7� 0353 N. Thorr�as Fcd. . E ct�. rto. Carbandale, Co. 31623 -- Ju 1 y 9, 1 9£�0 l'he ex i st i ng bu i 1 di ngs shown on Map "A" & "Fa-1 " i r�c i.ude the house which is about 220U sq. ft. on three le�els, and a 576 sq.ft , garagE . As you can aee a�er half of the house meets t.he SO' setbacK (about 2/3's) and about lf3 does not. The garage is built in thE 5G' sEtbacK. We would IiKE to a�.K for a �ariance to add on to the house and reda the garage . Where thESe buildings naw sit is a perfect F�lace a=_• the �U' setbacK is hea�iiY wooded with large cottonwood, fruit trees, and Ria�ny w i 1 d busfies and p 1 an ts. Th i s vege t�t i o� surrounds the buildings on the side�s and softens the �isual � imp�ct . Ety darl:ening thE color of the hui ldinqs we can get . thEm to blend into tF�e wooded area making it �ery plEasing ta iooK at . The remai�inq land, encla4ed in the buitding envelape , is a larqe hay pasture. Without the �ariance we � would ha�e ta build out in the apen and in the hayfiEld causing many problems with the irriqation ditches. ThE main hause cc,nsi �ts af an A-frame with two winys. W� would liKe to enldrqe the house by building a bedroom and bath aba�e each wi nq. CMak i nc� a total of :� bedre,�ms) �r� �, the EAST side of the house we wauld like to add a 24' X 50' additian , as shc�wn in the drawinq on "B" & "B-1 " . We would need a. �ariance as we do not meet the setback required. Out of the old garaqe we would liKe to build a guest or carEtakers unit C24'x24' ) which would be our 4th bedroom. Agai n, we do r�ot meet the se�tbacK requ i red and waul d r�Eed a �ariance . This building sets about 500' from the buildi�gs on the McIntyre property . This use is a1lowed undEr thE RS-30_ zoning by special re�iew. Tt�e new �U' x 60' b�arn to be Guilt would set in the 50' setback. There is an opening in the treES, just the �ight size for the building� abaut SU' fo the EAST of the old garage . It wauld be surrounded by trees on three sides and keep us from ha�ing to cut dcrwn any of thF old estdblished t�ees. It too, would sit about 500' from the Mclntyre buildings and we wcruld nEed a �ariancE for i•t . . . .�.. .__......_....._._._._.......��.______._.---._�----_._ ..-�- -- . . , . � . „ _ - � - - - � - - - - i . . � • ' . . � . • . The ad,ioining 2 lots, to the NQrth, are owned by Bruce - _ Mclntyre. Buildinqs are in place on his property �and .marKed with -X's on Map "C" . There is a natural drainage area ' <shown bY blue lines) pre�enting any buildings from goinq in on this area. Old cottonwood trees pre�ent any of ou� buildings from being seen an the McIntyre side � as shown in i the enclosed pictures. Also� ther,e is an enclosed letter j from Mr. McIntyre stating that he has na objections to aur +i being gi�en the �ariances applyed for . I letters from June Nightingale and Ken Wilson , neiqhbors, are � also included. i , � Without the �ariances we wouid ha�e to build aut in the open ; making it �ery unattracti�e f�om the road and as I remarkecS, ! causing problems with the hayfield and ditches. ' ThanK You. � . � ' i � Charles Larry Piffer � Konea R. Piffer � i . i ':� i' i � i I I f I � I i • I � i i ' . I ' - ( , ` � �� .. TiOiitu'� OI' C0. COi1r,'�,'S � . � PiTKIN C0. _ �/ � 1'uUlic Flectrin • F•- • - � � Dato � I . � _ Subfoct � ,. Exh. No. -'_' 1��7�� . � � June 2, 1986 � � Frank Harrington Scarrow & Walker, Inc. P.O. Box 460 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Re: Larry Piffer, Flood Plain Letter HCE File No. 86015 �� Dear Frank: We have reviewed .your Building Permit Map prepared for Larry Piffer under Scarrow & Walker, Inc. Job Ilumber 86.131. The map is in substantial agreement with the flood plain study af the appropriate portion of• the Crystal River, prepared by Denver � � • Engineering Corporation. The building envelope as shown on thP � map daes not lie within the normal 100 year flood plain as ' determined by Denver Engineering Corporation. Therefore, no ; adverse effects either from or to the floodplain are anticipatsd as a result of building in this location. i � If yau have any furttier questions, or need addi±ional � information, please contact us. Sincerely yours, HIGH COUrTTRY ENGINE�RILdG, INC. �`�"� Tim thy P. Beck, Colorado P.E. 20630 \`��a n u t u t i n n n i�� `��.��Q,pO,R,EG/s'f�i,,y'� :O ••.� pqU••.F % �o�,�••.��I► (�.9�.'; `�. o �,,G� . • �, . •,� _ - ° =� 20630"' = � = • •ac= . �9• :�c . :�,c"•. ••�T� %°'''FSS��NA`��0� ••.....••• .�� i��iiinmmua��e Suite 205, Village Plaze • Glenwood Sp�ings, CO 81601 Telephone 303-945-8676 . � _,. � _ _. . . . , r. ' _ ' ' - •• - � . - �o;,r;D or co. co:::.t�r,�s- �' _ ASPEN*PITKIIV- - rITKZ27 co. ENVIRONMENT�M �1��'�f� I„�EPr� � � p��co � /0��`�` � S�!bjeCt ✓'�O: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office E::�1. t:o. . . - • --- FROM: Bob Nelson, Department of Environmental Health DATE: August 21, 1986 RE: Piffer 1041 Floodplain Hazard Review Parcel ID #2463-221-00-004 Case # 037A-86 This department has reviewed the recently forwarded submission for compliance with Colorado Department of Health Regulations, local requirements, and those specifications in the Pitkin County Land Use Code under our jurisdiction. We present the following review comments for your consideration regarding the referenced proposal: 1. WATER SUPPLY Water is supplied to this residence from the Nettle Creek treated . water pipeline supplying the City of Carbondale. Quality and quantity are sufficient to continue to meet the water supply needs o€ this proposal. 2. SEWAGE DISPOSAL � The existing residence has some sort of onsite wastewater treatment system, but at this point we are not in a position to comment on its construction or whether it complies with the Pitkin County regulations. In 1976, the previous owner applied for and was issued the attached repair permit to correct a malfunctioning system, after we conducted routine soil tests which demonstrated that the soil of the area was suitable and that a system could be installed in compliance with applicable codes. We were not, however, ever notified of the completion of the repairs to the system. As a result, we never conducted any further inspections or granted final approval. Either the owners decided not to complete the repair or failed to notify our office that repairs were done in order to obtain the required final inspection. In the first case, we would insist that the entire system be replaced as a condition of any further building permits being issued. In the second instance, if a reconstructed septic system was finished in 1976 or shortly after, we would request that the current owners verify the location, construction materials and type of septic tank provi- . ded. This can be accomplished by exposing the septic tank and a part of the absorption field. If a contractor did any of the work, it is possible that he may have information or receipts • • . 130 Bouth Oebns Stroet . Aspan, Colorado 61611� ` 303/926-2020 �:i �•Ji.M►:..'w.. ... - .�+ ....... ..'..p-. .:.Y•.:.~.'7�i�1' ' , , ... . . ' - � ... '. ��ti:f::�, . •:I,:. '.d'" _ _. �, _ -_. �� , ,, . . _ - - _ _.. . - - _ j . - a Pif�er 1041 Hazard Review � August 21, 1986 Page 2 ' which could be used to verify some of the materiaYs and sizing on the system. - - � In either case, we anticipate that additional sewage system capacity will be required to serve the proposed addition and the ' "caretaker" unit. This departmenc continues to presume that the basic conditions of the suitable soils and available area on the site have not changed, and that while the regulatory zequirements have been modified the situation is such that additional permits could be issued on request. Ix� conclusion, any future onsite sewage treatment systems can be constructed to Pitkin County regulations, and these should function for a long period of time if properly maintained. 3. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS The elevation sketch shows another brick chimney on the addition . to the main house. We. assume that this is a fireplace, and wish to remind the owners that the existing air pollution regulations permit only one fireplace for each dwelling unit. We recall that the existing house already has a fireplace. We hope that the installation of a woodburning stove is an acceptable alternative, as it is permitted under the current regulations. cc: Charles anc� Konea Piffer Aspen/Pitkin Regional Building Dept. '..- ''•:t�'�;� � .';�.:: s�; . . - ,'-, . . ,_.._._.. .. . . .. ��. .. . .. .. .. _.. ,. . ... . .. . • __ �. �.�� ,..�� r�I:i.D OF' r0. Co:�.:,'I2'3 FITICIII Ca. Fublic I�earin� Ex,�lUita D.'t,t e � � AGENDA IT�M SUMMARY Sub,�oct �a��.` Er.h. Pio__� T0: Boarc! of County Commissioners �E20M: Tom Ne�aland, Planning �ngineer i RE: Request for Street Name Confirmation/Change - South Avenue � llAT�: October 9, 1986 � i REGULAR SESSION AGENDA DATE: October 14 , 1�86 /Resubmitted Oct.27,1986 INITIATOR: Stan Lauriski STAFF MEMBER RESPONSIBLE FOR ITEM: Tom Newland DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE: Stcin I.aui-iski , resident of Pitkin County, has f'ormally requested the county i:o confirm/change the name of the street wltere his residence is l.or.ated to "South Avenue" . The sti-eet is tlie portion of cahat is now known as Spruce Street betwPei� Gibson Avenue and Par{c Circle. After researching i:}ie caunty and city address maps, I have determined that Stan is the unl,y land owner who has a tegal address on this port.i.on vf Spruce Street . The �riginal plat map of the 1Villiains Addii;ion calls the Stre�t South Avenue, as does the county assessor maps (see figurc I) . According ta Stan, the strEet name was chang�d to Smu�glcr Mountain Road in the 1970's. After the completion af the Centennial Itousing project , the county has inclucied this 300 1'nc�t section of road as part of Spruce Street when reportin& count,y ruad invcntories to the state. 'Phe Post OfPice r•efers to all streets in this neighbort�ood as "49illiams Addition" . Post Office policy is to accept a street name change afi:er ii; has been approved by the 13oard of County Commissioners through a reso- lui;ion. Althvugh Stan's liause is t}ie only residence in the are� whi.cli fronts this portion of Spruce � Street , other residents have property abutting the right-of-way. They are: Stan Kopp, L1Ia Skufca, Clurie Bennis, and the Smuggler Home Owners Association. I have asked 5tan to approach these �an�lowners aad have them agree to the pruposed name change. He should have their signed agrpement no later than the date of the second reading of the attached resolution. AZTERNATIVES/OPTIONS: Should the L'ounty 3[�pl�ove the n�2ne cvnfir-tn- ation/r_hange of tl�is street? If so, the Hoard would be accomn►od- ating the wishes of the landawner most eff�cCed and rei:urning th� street to the historic name. Hawever, thF d��wnside af this �ction iaould be the sliort-term confusion the name cilange could .t...._.. .__. .-:. .. . . . . ._. ...._ ....__.._.....__..__. _..._..._. .._.. possibly cause. Approval of the adjacent neighbors should solve this potentia2 problem. RECOMMENDED ACTION: If Stan has tlie support of his surrounding neighbors, the staff recommends that the board approve the resolution on f:irst reading for this street name confirmatian/- change. This resolutian will then be publicly noticed and scheduled far a second reading and public heai•ing at the next available board meeting. .- . � /D-��-�C �� possibly cause. Approval of the adjacent neighbors should solve this potential problem. �— RECOMMENDED ACTION: .[ P Stan has the support of his surroundir,g neighbors, the staff recommends that the board approve the resolution on i'ii-st readin� for this street name confirmation/- change. This resolution will then be publicly noticed and scheciuled for a serond reading and public hearin� at the next available hoard me�tin�'. � ��.. ��M� � ��.� � -��- � c- � � � � ' ��. t� -� - �.��-� ° , . . . _ __.�_ ___-.-. . , .. . . .. �p� �� EOAFD OF C0. C01dLt'R'S PITKIN C0. � C/� Public Hearing �.�chibits Date . �v-a1- 8�° �� Sub3ect . r�"'�'�� //7� � ,." �� . .. -�.� �, ` C,y , ' . i The Aspea Times 31r��rt�,r irr co'�'�`'R'S i r.blic Ilcaring �;;hibits�; Box E :�c�to : �U -, eZ____ 7�,.,,8�'' Aspen, Colorado ti�uv�c�t : � �(� PR40F OF PUBLtCAT10N STATE OF COLORADO ) COp�/ Of NOtIC@ ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I W��R''D�aw�' do solemnly su•ear that , Publisher PUBLIC NO'CICE I am the of THE ASPEN TIMES; RE:Gibbone 1011 Flo�i�el�Hnza*d luview that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, p""�iD+��T•2casc� NOT�CE IS HEREBY CtVEN thot a publie and pubiished in the County of Pltkin, State of Colorado, and has henring will be held on october 2T„1986 at 9:00 oclack AM;beforc the'Pitkin�ount¢�oArd of a general eirculation therein; that said newspaper has been pUb- County Commiadonnre,in.the Commiaeion�e E Meetin Itaoin.'PilkiN County Courihouxe. lished continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitkin, Mnin S�tree4a o c�� b CO^61�r en ap� fOi 8 i�eation eubmil�ed Ir dames�Cibbons,rMUmt- period af more than fi[tytwo consecuti��e w•eeks next prior ,�g 1pq1,ploodp�airi�u��a xevicw aP�►ror to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- �he mn.tn�ction oro 3 40o a�ua*e�°°� 'emoR ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States �eq°°f'e.t000«roeeL�d qqu.reroot"� a 22.3 aceap�rceGlowced orvt6e,north eidSOtlhe Roerin6 For�:Rlver�epProzimatel.2�mlleb epatof mails as second-class matter under the rovisions of the Act of ota snoamad�'�'rucut�o�i�72.SeeHons.26 P ar�d25 Tgg.Rg6W.or_1GL1 W4er�Aoad)t;;' March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- Forlurtherintormnuom m�tacttheAepeNPit- paper is a weekly newspaper duly quatified for publishin legal kia Plannin Otfiee 130'S�Gelena Street,Asjicn. g coiomao ai��303�ass-zo�o,�_�2zz. notices and advertisements with the meanin of the laws of the -s-Heien K Kianderud Chnirwomon State of Colorado. � aon�aorco�,niy Gjommiesionen of Pitkin Counly,Colorudo . 1'ublished in the AspenTimce 3eptember 18,1986: Th�t the annexed legal notice or advertisetnenl was published in the regular and enttre issue of every number of said weekly Inewspaper for the period of __L consecutive. insertions; and Ithat the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said { newspaper dated 5eptember 18 q,D., is 86 and that ; the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news- paper dated A.D., 19_ � i � i / / � ISubscribed and saorn to before me, a notary public in and for ! + the County of Pitktn, State of Colarado, this ,day of ! A.D., 19`. ' �� Notary u ic My commission expires �� _ ��._:.�.�. �__... _ . : e� �..�, The Aspea Times r.cnr,n or co. COMM'R'S PITKIN C0. • �, P:iL•11c Iieuring �r.hibits � • Box E o� Dat� . __.�t7 '_ a7—OiO Aspen, Colorado � suU,�cet . ..�� PROC?F C�F PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ) C�(��/ Of NOtIC@ ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, W��R''�a�� da solemnly sK�ear that Publiaher I am the of THE ASPEN TIMES; : pUB�c NO'ciCE that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, AE:Pilfer 1041£loodylain Hszsrd Rev�evr NOTICE 13 HEREBY GIVEN thet a puElic and published in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has he�rfng will ba•half on Ottd�er 2T.tses se s�.ao a general circulation therein; that said news a er has been puM °'°�O��•�fo"�1°�u""�O11tr�°( P P County Commiedoceaf,in the Commie�lonen lished continuously and uninterru tedl in said County of Pitliin, Meeet'�a R°°m�e�`"�°°"�y�°°`�100°e'�E P Y Ma{n Streetl,�n.Colaredo to eonsider rn a . for a period of more than fifty-t«�o consecutive weeks next prior pll�c��ation wbmSt by Chark�,L and Konee� Piller.. e81041 FloodPlan Hssard oeyiew to the first publication of the annexed lesal notice or advertise- a s�e��t fanofanappm,:ImstelY. ment• that said nex�spaper has been addmitted to the United States ��4��0Ot'dd't{onbene:ishng.ree�dence , localed at 0353 North 77�omu Roed,a ro=Imate� maits as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of �y 6 m��uth of Carbonde�e along i�e w�erA bank oC lhe Cryatai River.7. March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said A@WS- For furlher m[ormet�an•contact the AsperilPit- kin Plenni Offia�1305�Galens Street'Aspee. paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal c.�toreaoei�r►��o3►szssozo,E=czx2, notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the eoerdorCou LyCommies�on�ot�'itkt�nCount� State of Colorado. ��o�� Pubtished in the Aspen 75mee on September 18, 1986. That the annexed legal notice or adverlisement µas published in the regular and enlire issue of every number of said weekly I newspaper for the period of � consecutiva insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper aatea September 18 A.D., is 86 and that the last publication of sald notice was in the issue of said news- paper dated A.D., 19— �U ' �'/�� Subscribed and sK�orn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, this .day of � A.D., 19� � • Notary u lic 11'Iy commission expires � `� � . _ __... r, . ;� � -� The Aspen Times BDARD OR C0. CDI.t1�f'z,s PITKIid C0. BOX E �blic Aclrin� �;;hlbit3 �nte : ��.:ca�.7.-.�__ i Aspen, Colorado f�� . ;ubject : �pr+w_�'V`Gu_�1'�� ' . . ;a. , PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ) CO�fy Of NOfIC9 � � ) ss. Counly of Pitkin ) - - ___ b�� N . " •___"_.. . � Will1atT1R'Dui�gw�}r do solemnlY sa•ear that ' ��,. o� . .� . . . . . . �"'oi'6�=� �° S � �ne � - ��r��M° I am the R�b11BheP of THE ASPEN TIMES; e'i� ° � . � � � � o�'�p�-n that thc same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, � §a 0� ��W M `�,�` �"' , g�'�� N� � Z7 ! o man m-� and published in the Counly ot Pitkin, State o[ Colorado, and has ' :a°9� ' N ` i �� ' �.• `''•�•: -" � ' • °i$b01�oo°, Q � Q, . A �f .;• �y.':;�.:•. .. .::,;:,:.,.;-.,. .,.;.. .�� •; d a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been pub- � G 1 F� ,� ' ' � - -��.y � y b o o�, , -�� ' n� . , r '��;".••� .� i. . ' 11 . �. ��I' 6�SnW66� � lished contlnuously and unlnterruptedly in said County o[ Pitkin, �� r•.', •- �( ��.:- r ii.. � :� <"� �,�o, o > (j' for a period of mote lhan fi[ty-two consecuti��e w•eeks next prior �� ,��-`��'��( �'�',�% c}'o: � 'Q' � ,��" '�'��'%� " �� ^6"�" m a 1'r.•'.. �".. e . • � A9 , '�� :: -cti5��•��,,�:»- 1-1?-•:�- !°,;=-''. B4�•'Sr�rt� � O lo the [irst publication of the annexed legat notice or advertisr. � o � �:�..�. ~ ` . ment; that said new�spaper has been addmitted to the United States s": °'� ��'�)'� � y".- N "` '`"'�=��(:�=�':i' �m a o�� !; ^O /,��""'" ��. 1�` i(�\:` � ::^�. • / ��n c� �ro maps as second�class matter under the provisions o[ lhe Act of �� " � " ��' .'" ��'�%;, . �'�'_.\^'J "M �a" � ii n March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news �e` , .�^� �,"� ,�"� �aJ��'�"' $� � ,:[?�� b`=$,�.��o ,�, � paper Is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal �°� oP r 8 a••`��S_;��,� �►y, � u �.•-i o`,�p��cµ � � notices and advertisemenls with lhe meaning of the laws of the �M e 9��-��.. �"=`- - M� e"� I� `� a ` �'" � �� '�� , _ ;�- 6 �� ..F..� � 5°,0,,.��,� Stale Of COlotado. � .°> ?'� l==^=�" • :;.�..— P .••. "<�'�.�—�� roa v�n o(.'P �. i! o� -, g� '��_ .�._, ;�_ —' � eo_i'3'�e^�'?'�• • nCBo��^.��'g Thet the annexed legal notice or advertisement w•as published ,o: M•� ' '_�O 4�. �� -y['s� 3�N ?�• � �,�'�"�j', / 5 m o C'.ro�m�� in the regular and entire issue ot every number of said weekly � • 0 � - ' : _� � 'f1' � _;. '��; �� ,� ga�o�,.� y n e w s p a p e r t o r t h e p e r i o d o t � consecu tive inser l lons; an d � ��' Q,°� �g� � �k t°'�e�� -_.t.r+.''��`'-::••_��0•1 �'°��o T'e°�� " that the firs[ ublicalion o[ said notice was in the issue of said �� g _ �� 1�,,,,�z-- s J �'�.a"�iO P � `� r."r •� �"r1S y�t„v' . . N o o �n,� 3aptember 18 86 � ` S W; _ :�.`'. �-:,`•;,/: ,. - < � ��=a�� newspaper dated p.D., 19_�and that �� n� W � -a :r �e� o,°,,,e., the last publication of safd notice was in the issue of said news- '¢ s' R e$ �p'b- . - . . � g o�T?m�A � rC Vb � � YO Q On b� papel' daled A.D., 19__ � e. i $Z "',o .•.• � ��n c°n a r M . � . . ._.__---- �--� � �cnK. .o�a . � _ . ._I:a .. `1��s�� Suburibed and sworn to before me,a nolary public in and�fo� .- the County ot Pitkin,Stale ot Colorado, this _day of A.D.,19� I�CUtL \ \ \�5L1lJll,�+1� Notary a lic My commission expires ��.►o j_ � a • _� � ��.�, The Aspea Times � � BOAFD OF C0. COI;i,['R'S BOX E PITKIN C0. Public Hearin� ��ch3bits Aspen, Colorado Date . .�o:_.a..7�86�. Sub�oct : �u� �.u,�.� .� PROOF OF PUBLIC�4TION � - STATE OF COLORADO ) GOP�/ Of �OtIC@ � ) ss. i County of Pltkin ) � I, William R''Dunawey do solemnly sw•ear that ! I am the �bli8her of THE ASPEN TIMES; that the same is a weekly newapaper printed, in whole or in part, - � -.--,.--.k__:.� _,� ` and published in the Counly of Pitkin, State of Colorado, Hfld heS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING '` ` a general circulation therein• that said newspaper has been •p�E'�E TAKE No'riCE:�e ene eon�a yi + , pQb- Count Commiulonen of Pilkln Counry;Colora• ; lished continuousl and uninterru tedly in said Count ot .PiUiin, ao.Wi�i rnnduct u publie,hesnng on thefollowing Y p Y . : Resolution ot 2•30 pm on the�27tN dey of Oetol,ier for a period of more than fifty-two consecuti��e weeks next pil0[ 19�•e�the Bourd ot couniy Commissioner'a hteetin�Room.Pitkln County Courthouse.608'E to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or adveltise- hlain Slrcet,Aapen oe wh�eh t{me 8n�P�ereap�� ment that said news a er has been addmitted to the LJnited States memben of thc_p�bf��m.y sppear and be h2$ti; , P P Reaolutfon DIo 66-103�� mails as second-class matter under the rovisions of the Act of RESOLUTION OF THE HpARD OF COUNT•Y P COMbtIS510NERS OF PITKIN�OUNTY,COG March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news• °` � �•��'� "+�`"�p�pp iot s�s�L:. ,_ .TO CHANGE THE KAME OE.A.PORTlON OF paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal '�'sPRUCESr[teerTO•sp[rrttpveNUC� �Copies of this Itewlution nre,svailebk for,p�uhltc notices and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of f�IC inspcetion in the Administration 011ice,ptkin CounW Courthou�e;606 F,s�t INairi Street,Aryee. State Of Colorado. Co�oraao,during normel bu�ineae houn,.: �1'ubliFhed•in'the Aspen 75ines Octo6eR(g,'1986 Th�t the annexed legal notice or adverlisement was published in the regular and enlire issue of every number of said w�ekly � 1 � newspaper for the period of consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was 'sn the issue ot said newspaper dated 0 c t o b er 16 A.D., 19 86 and that � the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news- � I paper dated A.D., 19_ r �� 7'�f '� Subscri6ed and sworn to before me, a notary pubiic n and for the County f Pitkin, State of Colorado, this .��, day of � A.D., 19_�4 � � � � Notary ublic ! My commission expires ` � �