Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.boa.98.09;,~.-,~<,,,,.,, ~~~, ~~,vy z~1'~"v ~ vr~ u~~ pamo;?E s? •g •bs- $o umumzzui ~ aiat?m laa3 ai2nbs •pamopn s? - aiaum 'aoueuen itjfi?ax ; •pazmba_ s? , ~-. a~aum ~aouQUt?p, xoEgiaS per], ap?S -N) ~r •pazmbai s? , c/ azaun, •aousue~; ~;oEg3aS pied ap?S ~ ,~ •pazmba: s~ , a.aux. •aaueue~~ sazgiaS pied, zeah - - •paimba~ s~ , ; ~ T a.aUx. •aousue r•_ ~;osq;aS Pin luol:' , ~-, <. ~,~, ~ _, aztC is r ??~;~~; :flIIilsanbaZ :uttuad ourolinc ~ ~uuu^,.u, to¢ io: saos~a~ pat 7uaunsnfpt' io p.teo~ ay: o: uo}tconddc siy_ n~znvo o: te~otl]r otnuo~ ac: atrJtn.:a: uoumosa: ~muo= au; is suo}s~no~ tiuamucda6 DuTUOZ aqi nq paiaidmo:+ ao o,ll c s,anu~iuasaica~ is s..aumJ --- i - vousanb u: sue. aq: itc mczvoo too saon r. is uouconddc stt: tsua. riot:.: p~zo£ aui 'asc~, stu: io uec apex a;, 1nn•. puc •uoucondd~ scy: nuedmcooc lsrtw ¢te~ mamuad nuF' _~~Jl'~ ~l ~-o`~ ' N`7 -1-~1-I-~J1N ~,SIO ~''y~3d02id 30 ~IOLL~"00 i ~~i8 0~ 7~ oz Il qd ss~xaaf o~~ ~~+~ ~Niz~s ~s ~ ct~iN ~~~ rL!~ ssaxaaY ~~ 5ZZ-.5Z ~xoxa N~vlo~ ~ o1~1yC1. ~ATT.t'.I.I:3s32Ia32? - ; ,~, O- ~'> ~ ESt'~ 8b~1~~5 tuio3 uouno??dd~- .Lt.~.LSIll'QF 30 Q2i~0E 7~.[.t~l1Q0 I~LXZId ielaioaS v _~. Pa??zy~ saoaoN ,~., ~;' -'7 5uuaay~i3o altia II to ~ ~ ~,- t ; _ ,~ paw uonEOpdd~ ~?o~p ~u?uoZ 31,~a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin Counry Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County zot»ng Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If you cannot appear personally a[ such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. A VARIANCE GREATER THAN OR LESS THAN THAT REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. DATE AND TIME OF MEETING: LOCATION OF MEETING: Tuesday, June 2, 1998; 5:15 P.M. Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO Richer, William: Requesting approval fora 20' Front Yard Setback Variance where 30' is required in the R-15 zone district, for the construction of a detached residential garage. Property Location: 0158 Apache Trail, Lot l O,Swiss village, Carbondale. Jaeger, Andrea & Bookout, Heidi: Requesting approval fora 30' Front Yard Setback where 30' is required, and a 12' West Side Yard Setback Variance where 15' is required for the construction of a driveway and associated retaining walls; also requesting a 10' East Side Yard Variance where 1 S is required for patio related improvements for this 30,618 lot in the R-30 zone district. Property Location: 0155 Nighthawk Lane, Lot 10, Ridge of Red Mountain, #2 Pitkin County. Aspen/Pitkin County Airport: Requesting approval fora 4 foot height variance where 6 feet is allowed for the construction of a berm located within the required 100 foot major road setback (Owl Creek Road). Property Location: 233 East Airport Road Submitted to the Aspen Times on May 19, 1998. To Be Published in the Aspen Times on May 23, 1998. Pitkin County Account: 002.02 S T R Y K E R /BROW N A R C H I T E C T S, P C SUMMARY LETTER REQUEST FOR BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SETBACK VARIANCE REVIEW ....................................................................................................................................................... TO: Ms. Suzanne Wolff Planner Pitkin County Planning Department Community Development Department City Hall 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 FROM: David P. Brown, AIA DATE: May 11, 1998 Re: Setback Variance Request,Bookout-Jaeger Residence, , 0155 Nighthawk Lane, Lot 10, The Ridge of Red Mountain Replat No. 2, ,Pitkin County, Colorado. On behalf of Andrea Jaeger and Heidi Bookout, I am requesting Setback Variances for a proposed residence at the above referenced location. I am requesting this review to comply with the requirements of the Pitkin County Land Use Code, Section 7-103. This project is scheduled to be reviewed by the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission on May 19, 1998. They are reviewing Scenic Overlay, as the existing and proposed residence are partially visable from the highway 82 corridor. The zoning regulations are R-30 FRONT SETBACK 30' SIDE SETBACK 15' would be 10' if less than 30,000 SF lot MIN.LOT WIDTH 100' FAR allowed 3979.52 The lot was approved September 4, 1974, prior to the current (1994) zoning regulations. The current building envelope (described by the setbacks) is more restrictive than the envelope in effect at the time of the replat. The steep site conditions combined with the current envelope, and original lot width has created a 300 SOUTH SPRING STREET, SUITE 300, ASPEN, COLORADO 81811 970.92$.22$4 925.2258 (FAX) Variance Request,Bookout-Jaeger Residence, , 0155 Nighthawk Lane, Lot 10, The Ridge of Red Mountain Replat No. 2, , Pitkin County, Colorado. page two condition of "exceptional narrowness" (92'-99') and "exceptional topographic condition" that results in peculiar practical difficulties to the Owner. The variances requested will ~t be detrimental to the public good and will nit substantially alter or impair the intent and purpose of the zoning district regulations. Existing conditions: LOT SIZE 30,611.72 SF +/- 10,000 SF +/- is dedicated to a community water pump so the net lot area is about 20,000 SF LOT WIDTH varies from 92' to 99' (LESS THAN MINIMUM) FAR Proposed less than allowed, 3750 sf +/- The variances requested will: Lessen an existing non-conformity: The existing house is NOT within the current front and side setbacks. The proposed main structure of the proposed home will be entirely within the setbacks. The setback variances are for: Driveway, (greater than 30" variation from existing grade) This permits the garage to be set within the zoning envelope. The sloped retaining for the driveway is a "structure", is within the front and side setbacks, and requires a variance. Some of the driveway and its boulder "retaining walls" are greater than 30" from original grade. Landscape cover in front of the retaining wall on the south and west sides and a portion of the Parking area, (greater than 30" variation from existing grade) This will allow the landscape to conceal the retaining wall, resulting in a reduced visual impact of the structure and a more natural appearance with landscaping. The alternative is a 13' high concrete wall, within the setback, on the west and south side of the parking area. Minimize visual impacts of patios • Patios, (greater than 30" variation from existing grade) Variance Request,Bookout-Jaeger Residence, , 0155 Nighthawk Lane, Lot 10, The Ridge of Red Mountain Replat No. 2, , Pitkin County, Colorado. page three The house has been designed to follow the natural contour and step up the hill (refer to WEST AND EAST ELEVATIONS) in order to decrease the apparent mass and height. Due to the narrow lot (92-99') width combined with the steep topography, this leaves only 67' envelope width. To further decrease the apparent size of the project and to "hug" the contours, we have placed some of the patios on the side of the house. However, the rule permitting only 30" modification from the existing grade would permit only extremely shallow patios. We request that we be permitted to place retaining walls within setbacks greater than the 30" rule in order to make a small portion of this extremely narrow and steep site usable. Please refer to the Living Level east end (at the Kitchen), Lower Bedroom Level east end, and the Parking area, west and south side. This variance will allows the patios to flow into the landscape and be designed in a "natural" appearing way. Efforts will be made to feather the patios into the landscape and make the retaining walls appear "organic and natural". Minimize visual impacts of retaining walls As described above, it is our intent to use. boulder retaining walls where practical and landscape them as much as the Owner's budget will permit. It is also our intent to finish vertical retaining with either stone or (dark natural colored) stucco veneers. If you have any questions or wish to review or visit the project site or the model, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, David P. Brown, AIA Neighboring properties contiguous to Ridge of Red Mt. Replat No.2 Lot 10 David R. Chamberlin P.O. Box 7926 Aspen, CO 81612 Robert J. Cooney 120 N. Lasalle St. 30th Floor Chicago, IL 60602 David A. Gitlitz P.O.Box 1377 Aspen, CO 81612 David & Anne Crossland Tower Hamlet Houge Bie St. Saviour Jersey Channel Islands, England JE27UA James R. Hedges IV Lund M. Hedges 400 5th Avenue S Naples, FL 34102 Kenneth H. Gutner Revocable Trust P.O.Box 11001 Aspen, CO 81612 Saval LTD c/o Valencia Salador Heliotropos 270 Torreon Coah, Mexico S T R Y K E R/ B R O W N .dl R C H I T E C T S , P C EXHIBIT A/ REQUEST FOR BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SETBACK VARIANCE REVIEW Vaziance Request Board of Adjustment Bookout-Jaeger Residence„ 0155 Nighthawk Lane, Lot 10, The Ridge of Red Mountain Replat No. 2, ,Pitkin County, Colorado. EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 10, The Ridge of Red Mountain Replat No. 2, ,Pitkin County, Colorado. 300 SourH $PFtINC SraEer, Sur[r•.300, Aspen, Cot.oanoo 81611 970.925.2254 925.2258 (FAX) c, E arm N rf ~ mro ~ro~ ro ° r ~nrtan o ~u.ro f~• gR =~~ of w~r ron- n~° m~m~ a boar ~~~ ~~ rg~ D mn M ~'~ n I a H r•to anrto 7' H C w r•a H iD Ss' araw I @~ ~ ~ • W- r N W H 7 n N st N `J Jg K G t H r O A K. H ~ trl ~ ~ a O 3~„ Bc ~ ' C N rt was r 0 r-ar-a aO O N N g ~ ~~ y ] • N N ID a G a ~ o. ate- w •• n rt n :f Q wa ~a~ y~ortb`Qa a«ae~a~ a i°Jz°e ~~ ~ _ ~ o . ~ t . mN a a ° <m° ko m• ~ `r 0o nH a ~ N r s r W - r t ~ n o 0 r •r ~ r~a}Fx G o w an a°CnN a N a O ~ a mmH~H ~ ryyn p,7p v aaa C ° ® r-^ t r •• ~ J rory r D ~ ~RI R ~ M rt0 ~ R anamHrt N~ w~Y• w ~. arta wHw . m ~ ww~mmp• Nfr ~ '•lfCN < ~ ~°om rm~i r•m ara Y~w ro• o N N N ~ a ro is a ° N~~ ° ~s rE fi. t r CO N-+r t r s r n a o~ s a wrort ' ~ awro r- o OtD xOrtfSMM NO t! OAOa A roH M ~Bfrt70- a5•rt `G07C a Y•O a tt A ' a sy N h1 r• tr r • N ID `C n rr ,yw w y L ~ C a O an nm r Nb C n ID r 'w~ w •r~ H K aoa GP'a.F~ •. +oaC aNa C G ~ N 'y~ r G n « rtE • • tr'Onp•OrNOa Km ~C N ~ 4 ; [a'FH ~ ~ rWR~~ Chi 'd ~' O R1 G~ rt ro a~ • m ••< ~o ~~am°o a n ~ ~ _ ~ ~ a • r w w AO H 9 ~pr~ I~H roCH ~ rt r a N ~ $ R°tJ ' R~4 W ° N Y rt '~ MC „~ my~O N7r 1p d Ue t WO N sy y a fiO ° ~ . ° asrN ~ yK rrmr e <<~ a~ d ar rcaa ~~ ~~ m a s a ff b e a a o ~ a r. p Y. ,,. a a~ ,y .., w o, r~ v. KO o ~ Y Iy rtO" N'JNR~ l°0~ HE O . ~ ~ C~•C nr•rar tOrm~rr rt K~rN•••Ow rm ^~ H O p' rt ~'- rt m ~••• r• r• ' r ' O a w., rt rt + u, H Q O N b ro O>c a r nN~ v W a ~'t N W a 0 N H •O ID f0 H r• O ,y ma A IeafDO P•Nanrr xro nr• aC C•'tYArr w CNAI]w r• n NN r{ oo ~N wW'~ ra m y' ° ~ a° d n t ~ e r7 • w r-n 0 o Np 00 H roro te~<wa * N aCE •an a +~ ~S as s ~ dY- ~m Nr r 5 o w I n • oa w N4Y NN ~ rro w E,ro ~ m rt~o r H n r• tp iu o o w ~e o ary Nrroo~•o rtW w 7c' tl O' O M'Li [r O rt rt t! w iC W N D N• •J !9 M a O S W O n ID P~ ~' ~ ry ~~r} ~ pa 4 H 0 N na m N ( r p'sr. c D O C ° ~ wm°nmwk n •CSGrrom car s n~~~w ° o ° ~ ~~ ~ ~ r n~ s r ~~ • H u (_~ ~> N Os Y to ~ ~ o ro a F+- tj ti1 {P N 2• k'. a o ro M ~ ~qq H O X rt ~ J~1. ~ N 1 ~ 1 /~ 1~ ,.ro ~wf .qtr-, --- ~ ~ ~v~ ~ ~'zl ~~~ / 1 •a J •~ a3~i do n ~~ ~~ ~~ c ~~73a(' ~~,~+o~ocYd 937 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART1Vtr;NT 130 South Galena Street„ +r:_ Aspen, Colorado 81611' (970) 920-5090 Pitkin County i Land Use: 172 Board oCAdjustment 159 County Land Use Code 173 Deposit 174 Flat Fee 162 Zoning and Sign 17] Public Notice Referral Fees: RB115 Access Pernxit 197 County Clerk 193 County Engineer 194 Environmental Health 198 Housing I90 Land Management 196 Wildlife Officer Building Fees: 170 Board oC Appeals 135 Building Code Sales 105 Building Perini[ 100 Contractor License 120 Electrical Permit 195 Energy Code Review 175 Mechanical Permit I50 Plan Check I10 Plumhing Perini[ 130 Reinspection 151 Aspen Sanitation 152 AVFD Fire Marshal Other Fees 155 Use Tax 165 Copy Performance Deposit 185 Park Dedication 186 Housing Cash in Lieu 166 GIS Maps ~:~ ~ .F-~/ RB116 Road Impact Fees TOTAL l t _~~.~- NAME:- ~ f ' ~ 1~%~i. 1•i .. 1 ,f~i ~ ~.~~--/~ ADDRESS/PROJECT': ~~~-U~'~)~f~`d''Ji`J/~ ~_ PHONE:- ~ ; c~~ f jC ~~) CASE/PERMIT#: ~.__hJ~# OF COPIES:- DATE: -~.`,3-,L1i INITIAL: (i ,_ County of Pitl~n } AFFIDAVTT OF NOTICE BY POSTING } ss. OF ~ VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE State of Colorado } THE PTTKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The undersi~gn~edj.~being first duly sworn. deposes and says as follows: I, (./n ~~ ~ ,~' ~~w~ .being or representing an ~nplicant before the Pitkin County Board or _-Adjustment, personally certify That the attached photo~aph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as notice of the ~~ariance hearing on this :tatter in a conspicuous place on the sunject property (as it could be seen ,?om tJhe nearest public ~va~: ~~ and chat the said sign ~Nas posted and visi'vie continuously from the Z~,adav ;~f a ? ~~ to the V N~jay of ~~ . '. 9~~' (Must be posted ','or zt ?east nine ~ 91 full ~iavs before the hearing date). - . ~„~~~ _-~poiicant's Signature ~~ ~` ~. ,'+~~"'"~° ~ "~ '~ ~ '~ bscribe[\d,an1pd/sworn to be o me this r ~a3M.- V ~. 1 v ~n H~vD AND OFFIC?AL Sr<~L.. ~~ ~ '"~~ - ~ -,~, ~1 r- ..lion expires: JANUARY8,Zfl02 y .~ ~ ~~ M~! t s; it -- _ ~ ~ ~~~, ~ ,~~I ~ '7(iC~S S1 alLlre ~~ ~ ~' l ~~ -~;~Z Address ~ i~n,~ ~~~ ~/ ~ ~ / A ,.. A z g a m ~ _ Z 1 / D ~ r ~ / / / ~ O / v a ~ / r ~ o r ~ / Z ~ 3p~. _ / o _~ -, / ^ ~ / / ~, / , ~ , ~ / / ~ / Qy ~; ~~ / ~ / _ / D~~NZ / to / J AZO°o~z / a / / Q / / Z'~IO~D O / ~ DA G~ Apm / O / ~ / ~y ~ ~ r'~ mo / ~ / / ~ fns ~~ 3C DZ / vj 'O < / / nUm y m~ o ~ n = / ..~ ° J n / / ~ / i wr °~~ D , o / , O 0 ~ z / ~ v / ~ mae~ Nr mC ~-t ;" ~r / ~ f~*1~~ Zr -Dim / dam / ~ ~"~ $ -~ j (BASS / ~vD~ / / 1 ! !~; ~ i I ~ 1 / I O!/~ ~ 25.00// 1 , a r / ~ NOt'20'00"E 1 mae~ ~~ ~ /rll I I 1 ~ ~ / / ~c-0 ~~o ~- ~ ,~ ~ ~ Q s1 ~ -~ ~, ? . ~ ~ o -7R~ ~7~aj i+- ~ !~ 3 ~ ~\ - ~ ~ A' ~ ~ ~ 'l- rt n 'V 0 308.63' v ~ r ~ tnvy n> s~/ / /1:~ 1.11.1 / i/ // / / o o ~ ~/ a/ 7-lll0///all/l~I~i!!4"1111 r! ~ / I l r -i / ~ / /' lil / / ~ / / ! / /. / / / / // ~ ~ // % ~ii/ /i// T O O O coo v / 1 / / ~O / /// // / ~i //~ 1 / / /// ~..~ .~ 00 ~ ~r / ~ / // / r ~ / / '~// '/~; ) /l /'/~ / /// //1/ ~l~/; / lj;j ~I oytnom AA / Dm /' / . : j / / / //~ / ~~/ .~1 / ,/// /// ! ///l / l / / /,i// // // // / 111 1 / 11 l I ~ O "' / ~ / ~t- / I / / /. l 11 / i. / / ; i ~v ~' s / '~!, ,/~I- /-'/ /; / // / /j 1, /, l / // j/, ! l Hccoo-.. u, / i // / % /~,__ ~T / / / // / / /// ~~f ,/ , / /I 1, 1/ f I a~ z7 Dc --l f - -~ ! J / / J X / l '/ % t/ /\ :, / ' i / / / / ~/ - I ' l i l /i/l l~ l / i ~ / / ..' °m " ° ~ ~_ / •~ / T/ / i/i ly/ / / / / / / / / / l/~~ l /% / / / I ~~ ~'{ ~' ~ l -=/mil i ! i / // ~/ /~•//~../\/ i ` /// / / / //~ //, / ,,, / // / /I/, -~mml ~ 3 3 0 ~ -, 'goo , - i / i / // j1`/ // / ~ / / ~,~ I //// i. / , / /// OA to /; O ~ ~ . I ~ ~' ~' ~~~ n / / ' / / / 331.19' OF BEARINGS) AGENDA/1VIEM0 PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT July 7, 1998 at 5:15 P.M. MEETING ROOM, SISTER CITY'S ROOM, CITY HALL 98-09 ANDREA JAEGER AND HEH)I BOOKOUT R-30 0155 Nighthawk Lane, Lot 10, Ridge of Red Mountain, Replat 2 Pitkin County, Colorado Requesting approval fora 30' Front Yazd Setback Variance where 30' is required, and a 12' West Side Yazd Setback Variance where 15' is required for the construction of a driveway and associated retaining walls; also requesting a 10' East Side Yazd Setback Variance where 15' is required for patio related improvements on this 30,618 squaze foot lot in the R-30 zone district. 98-10 Daniel K. Thorne AFR-10 101 Little Texas Lane, Woody Creek Requesting approval fora 10' Front Yazd Setback Variance where 30' is required, and a 1S Reaz Yazd Setback Variance, where 30' is required for the construction of a single family residence in the AFR-10 zone district. 98-11 JOHN PHILLIPS R-30 0218 Willoughby Way, Lot 2 Lynch Lot Split Requesting approval fora 2T Front Yazd Setback Variance where 30' is required, and a S West Side Yazd Setback Vaziance, where 15' is required for the construction of a detached carport in the R-30 zone district. 98-13 Dr. Betty Gerstley R-15-A 45275 Highway 82, Lot 10 Block 1, Mountain Valley Subdivision Requesting approval fora 8' Major Road Setback Variance where 100' is required from the Highway 82 right-of--way for an addition to a single family residence in the R-I S-A zone district. 98-14 ASPEN/PTTKIN COUNTY AII2PORT PUD 233 East Airport Rd, Aspen, Co Requesting approval fora 4' Height Variance where 6' is allowed for an earthberm to be located within the 100' Major Road Setback of Owl Creek Road. 96-22 Aspen FM, Inc. (TO BE TABLED) RS-30 Williams Hill Communication Site Requesting approval fora 72' Height Variance where a maximum of 28' is allowed to erect a 100' tall radio antenna in the RS-30 zone district. PLEASE CONTACT SHARON HIRMAN AT 920-5109, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO CONFIRM B+ YOU WILL ATTEND THE MEETING. NIINUTES Pitltin County Board of Adjustment July 7, 1998 Members Present: Rod Dyer Ellie Brickman Michael Cooper Bill Lukes, Chairman Paul Rudnick Members Absent: Bob Throm Staff: Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Officer George Lilly, Secretary Theresa Albers prepazed minutes Lukes opened the meeting and introduced the Boazd. Case #98-09 ndrea Jaep,~r/Heidi Bookout. 0155 Nighthawk Lane. Lot 10. Ridge of Red Mountain, Replat 2 Lukes introduced the request fora 20' Front Yazd Setback variance where 30' is required, and a 12' West Side Yatd Setback Variance where 15' is required for the construction of a driveway and associated retaining walls; also requesting a 10' East Side Yazd Setback Variance where I S' is required for patio related improvements on this 30,618 squaze foot lot in the R-30 zone district.. Schaffner indicated that the property was in a subdivision approved by the Boazd of County Commissioners therefore a 1041 Hazazd Review was not an issue. The proposed residence had received scenic overlay approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. David Brown, the owners representative, stated that with the new designs he hopes to reduce the existing setback nonconformity of the building. The Homeowners approved the proposal. The applicant, Andrea Jaeger, spoke on her behalf regazding the future improvements. No other members of the public were present. Dyer moved to approve request due to topographic hazdship. Cooper seconded. Passed 5-0. Case#98-10 Asp /Pi kin o ~ntv Aimort_ 233 E Aimort Road Lukes introduced the request fora 4'Height Variance where 6' is allowed for an earthberm to be located within the 100' Major Road Setback of Owl Creek Road. Schaffner introduced Scott Smith, airport manager and representative, to the Boazd. Smith stated the need for storage area, between the berm and fence line, to store soil from the excavation of the runway. Then reuse the soil to construct berms along Owl Creek Road. It was stated that the slope next to the runway can not be greater than a 7 to 1 slope. Lukes noted his concerns for the shaping and revegetation of the land. The original shape will remain and reseeding will occur using ditch water for temporary irrigation. No members of the public were present. Cooper stated that he rents a hanger at the airport and asked if anyone felt a conflict of interest. No conflict was stated. Lukes moved to approve as requested due to downzoning with conditions that provisions be made by the Airport to create natural landforms and revegetate with the use of a temporary irrigation system. Rudnick seconded. Passed 5-0. Case# 98-1 l John Phillips. 213 Willoug,(L~Way. Lot 2 T yn h T nr S~ Lukes introduced the request fora 27' Front Yazd Setback Variance where 30' is required, and a 5' West Side Yazd Setback Variance, where 15' is required for the construction of a detached carport on this .26 acre lot in the R-30 zone district. Warren Palmer, representative, was present and requested that this item be tabled due to a last minute question regazding the proposal's compliance with floor azea requirements. No members of the public were present. Dyer moved to table the case until the next scheduled meeting. Brickham seconded. Passed 5-0. Case # 98-12 Daniel K. Thorne. 101 Little Teva~ T one Wood, r Pk Lukes introduced the request fora 10' Front Yazd Setback Variance where 30' is required, and a 15' Reaz Yazd Setback Variance, where 30' is required for the construction of a single family residence on this .68 acre lot in the AFR-10 zone district. Schaffner stated the property is on the river side of the subdivision and that it received a 1041 Hazazd Review approval. The home had previously burned and the owners would like to replace it with a slightly different house. A variance request for the front yazd was corrected to read as follows: A 20' Front Yazd Setback Variance. John Wheeler, representative, was present. No members of the public were present. Brickham moved to approve as requested with correction due to downzoning. Dyer seconded. Passed 5-0. ~1 Case # 98-13 Dr Bettv Gerstly. 45275 Highway 82. Lot 10 Block 1 Mountain Vallev Subdivision Lukes introduced the request for approval for an 8' Major Road Setback Variance where 100' is required from the Highway 82 right-of--way for an addition to a single family residence in the R-15-A zone district. Schaffner stated that the building is a duplex. This case had previously been before the Boazd for other improeements. Roger Kerr, representative, was present. Richazd Haberman, as the Homeowners representative, was present. Haberman was asked if the Homeowners approved the plans. He stated that he had not seen the plans but had asked about the squaze footage. No other members of the public were present. Rudnick moved to approve as requested due to downzoning. Dyer seconded. Passed 5-0. ~*~*tt*^t~~~r*******•~«~***•r**rs*-*as~---****+.*..**assx~x~t^**rr^^*-* Schaffner announced that The Community Development Duector has directed that, because of a current lack of staff, the minutes for the Boazd of Adjustment will not be transcribed, for an indefinite period of time. The Board felt strongly that the tape recording of the meetings was not enough and that they definitely wanted minutes to be prepazed. Dyer moved to request the minutes still be transcribed every month. Brickham seconded. Passed 5-0. Schaffner will appeal to Cindy Houben. A discussion ensued regarding Shira Geller's replacement on the Boazd. Dyer moved to recommend Paul Rudnick as a regulaz member of the Boazd to BOCC. Brickham seconded. Passed 4-0 with Rudnick not voting. Rudnick moved to adjourn. Cooper seconded .Passed 5-0 Meeting adjourned at 7:10 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Theresa Albers, Secretary g~a3~~~ Date X Approved as submitted Approved with noted change(s) B1~ ~~ Date . .. ymvuTEs Pitkin County Board of Adjustment June 2, 1998 Members Present: Rod Dyer, Acting Chairman Ellie Brickfiam Paul Rudnick Bob Throm Members Absent: Bill Lukes Shira Geller Mike Cooper Staff: Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Officer George Lilly, Secretary at meeting Theresa Albers prepazed minutes Dyer opened the meeting and introduced the Boazd. Case #98-08. William Richer. 0158 Anache Trail. Lot 10 Swiss V'illaee Dyer introduced the request fora 20' Front Yazd Setback Variance where 30' is required, for this 150 squaze foot lot in the R-15 zone district, for the construction of a detached residential garage. It was stated that Schaffner took into account the overhang on the garage. It is 11' to the comer of the house but 10' to the overhang. There were also concerns on the gully and grade behind the garage. The gully drops approximately 10' on a gradual cut. One comer of the structure will need to be engineered because of the low elevation. William Richer was present. No members of the public were presem. Throm moved to approve as submitted due to topographic hardship. Brickham seconded. Motion passed 4-0. Case # 98-09. Andrea Jaeger and Heidi Bookout. 0155 Nighthawk Lane Lot 10 Ridge of Red Mountain. Replat 2 Dyer introduced the request fora 30' Front Yazd Setback Variance where 30' is required, and a 12' West Side Yard Setback Variance where 15' is required for the construction of a driveway and associated retaining walls; also requesting a 10' East Side Yard Setback Variance where 15' is required for patio related improvements on this 30,618 squaze foot lot in the R-30 zone district. A request to table the case was submitted due to a public notice deficiency. A faxed letter was read into record from Gideon Kaufinan on behalf of David Gitlitz, an adjacent property owner who was concerned of being able to see the house. David Brown was present as the applicant's representative. No other members of the public were present. Rudnick moved to table the case. Throm seconded. Passed 4-0. Tabied until the next scheduled meeting. Case #98-10 Asoen/Pitkin Countv Airport. 233 E Airport Rd Dyer introduced the request fora 4' Height Variance where 6' is allowed for an earthberm to be located within the 100' Major Road Setback of Owl Creek Road. Request was submitted to table the case due to a public notice deficiency. No members of the public were present. Brickham moved to table. Rudnick seconded. Passed 40. Tabled until the next scheduled meeting. *::*~:.e:s:**:***ssas::*::::~~~:~*~:asss::::s:sss««*s:s*s:sssrs**:sa:ss Dyer moved to approve minutes from the May 5, 1998 meeting. Throm seconded. Passed 40. Ellie Brickham requested to have her name spelled correctly. George Lilly announced Shira Geller's resignation from the Board of Adjustment. Meeting adjourned. Respectfiilly submitted, ~~~~~h~n Theresa Albers, Secretary 9-a~ 9R Date X Approved as submitted Approved with noted change(s) B' Ickes, Chair cv oGT °-S Date