The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.min.spec.10291997 � --__ ___ . — ...__._� ` ,; � � ;;{�: � `_� ,;� s=l: :'�z?�. , ��ti;•� ;, PITHIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' AGENDA � 1> j ';�,: i WEDNESDAY.OCTOBER 29.1997 -. � �12:00 PM SPECIAL MEETING-BOCC Room in the Courthouse - ' ' ' EXECUTIVE SESSION-Litigation E�;:�'. I , � -. � � 1:00 PM SPECIAL MEETING-Sister Cities Room,City Hall �?" �' � Continued 2nd Reading,Aspen Highlands Base Village Detailed Submission&Rezoning,Lance ;' i Clarke ;' ' j '� . � �/ 6:00 PM SPECIAL MEETING AT REDSTONE-Osgoode Room,Redstone[nn c 1. Redstone Scenic Overlay Code Amendment,2nd Reading&Public Hearing,Suzanne g Wolff i 2. Open Discussion-Update on Issues of Community Interest ` . . i � � � � : [ - � j i � ' � 1 _ '.' I a � � � . � F � • 1�. _ I �, i I , . _. ....... ,..� .;..;.x..:_,;:.�<, ...�.;,..�..._..: ...r_;�. '.. -.. , . �.. � .. . _ . .,. . ,. . ,. - �..... ._:�.� _� . � �.. . .• � . . ....-�.... . ..:�..:. . . . ..,-:,,,. _.. .__:. . :.:.: . . ... �::�- .. ., � i�_ " f`� � . . / . _ � 1 !-'.'�.�, • � , . � . . 1�:� ti �; ' • ._ - . � � . . � , . . • t _ , . . . ...__.-----� , -� . . — ._--.- —__ � '-n; , eT�-_--r_�.. --._---' . �. .p.�! ___ _ ,... . .__ r.'� �.#.� r 6, �, ,,.•;� � ., � `� :ii�'rt�3 yi��t:�}�.^��t,L��..�t.� �.�� .: �J..�. . . ..,��t�}�,.•�'�I�'..11. ♦.1•4�P. . ... . k"�.i'� .�. �`��. . �4' , �k. ,�±,r ��.ti��: , i ' Atf EXECUTIVE SESSION MINUTES FOR WAS NOT SUBM[TfED FOR THE 12:00 PM EXECUTIVE " �t' SESS[ON � ~� r :; �� •'�,. , 4�.. � � i.�.'',. 1��--``.µ��y . :E�:9.'��. . ' . . . �:��.C,. �7 . "f�� i S ' � ' ; 3 3 � "j.'�,.;-;:'_ � � _ ,i ' ; ' __i I • 1 �� } z� � �, , ;�~_ ' I ;1.`:� � , � ;4} , , � , : _. _ .._::... .. :_ _...,.:o:.0 ....._.��.�. _ .� .�::,... . ..;::,.�,.. _<:ac.t ,.y,a';, e . Yk.._. . . _... .. .,i_, r .T� .. ��` . / . . ... - . .. • , t . � . . I . ' . _ . . . -' . , I 4 . �� . . . - �, �_.. . . � -.. ...� - - . .r... . . � � � . . - . � .�� . . '- .:E�: .. - � : . � � � . � � � . . � � . . . . - � . . • . - � . . / . .. ...'. . . � .� . . � ---_.-_---_'_-___'1 ,�.. _. �!^��'�--`+'-�-... --._--- . ! ' � . :h� ;y. i: �?� J�`:'. ��.� �. . ��.'�rii;_A�'.1... APPROVED 12-03-97 �� y ti�'' �� '_� '4t:¢; .�, �� a MINUTES :y�� .' ,. PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ��,''�' . �. SPECIAL MEETING Y:±`-` .,:'r' OCTOSER 29,a 997 ,k._,`. . �.: . - y:.: �:; CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Bill Tuite called a special meeting of the Board of Counry ;;:� Commissioners to order at 1:00 pm ;;�;"• i: C'OMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT• Commissioners Bill Tuite,Shellie Roy Harper, Mick Ireland and Leslie Lamont �:J, ; b RESbLUTION RANTING DETAILED SUBMISSION PLANNED iJ1VIT �I �7� DEVELOPMENT.1041 ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD REVIEW.AND SPECIAL ��f RFVIEW APPROVAL TO THE ASPEN HIGHLANDS BASE VILLAGE- � ' �OTION TO APPROVE Lance Clarke,Deputy Communiry Development Director,introduced this item as a continued '�� public hearing on the Highlands Base Village Detailed Subdivision for the rezoning and for the subdivision approval. Two separate actions are required which are approval of the Resolution for the Detailed Subdivision and approval of the Ordinance rezoning the property. Those public , hearings were advertised and held at the last meeting of September 24th and continued to this date to allow the applicant do some additional work primarily with Dan Blankenship,Roaring Fork Transit Director,and Bud Eylar,County Engineer. � t . With respect to the work with Dan Blankenship,tl�ey needed to come to an agreement as to how � the dial ride service would be structured and also as to how it would be structured that an additional bus would be added to the Castle/Maroon route;what triggers there would be to make that happen. With respect to the work with Bud Eytar,they needed to work with some additional items associated widi the construction management plan regarding parking,tool storage,etc. As well r� as the fact that the applicant had distributed to us just two days before that meeting,two very key . � , documents. These documents are the Detailed Submission Consolidated Plan and what has been attempted with these,is to represent,when completed,the actual Detaited Plan Document that will be recorded,to be used as the primary document to judge all the zoning approvals against .�• when it comes through for building permit. He referred to a short memorandum from him to the Board,that outlines where we've been and where we are going,and the fact that today,we are *�� _�S . �:� ' ; '- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS[ONERS 1 SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 29,1997 ' f ... 5.-:.i . . ..:a ,. j � ; i ' ti f ..;.. . i ... . + ' . -- --- - , •.a. _ _._ — - . , 2""'�---- �,x -= " �----- - � ��<�„-„�� ^��t� �`�;�,.;;�,��ti, ' dealing with the continaed public hearing on the ordinance and the resolution. A copy of this .' !: memorandum is attached hereto and made a part of this record as FXHIBIT"A'. ' r,� , �'.. Clarke referred to some additional items in the packef inciuding a letter from Glenn Horn of ' September 24th,where he details alJ of the changes that have been made in the plan since it was 'y'.,�'�, first presented to the Board at Detailed Submission and today,and those changes are represented in these two documents. 1'he other document in the packet,is an October 17th letter where Mr. !=`: �• Horn has responded to some of the questions that came up at the last meeting regarding some additional information we wanted to have in the PUD Guide regarding colors,reflective roofs, �s;?':,,�- etc.,he talks about the bench mark,which is going to be established for elevntion and where that �: ^. was going to be established,tree removal,transit plan,construction plan,weed management plan ''''�?" and those things are all attached. Attachment 1 is what has been worked out with Dan �`� ` B(ankenship for the Castle/Maroon RFTA route;when tUe busses will be added. It also details �>:-' =' ' the"Dial-a-Ride"system. Attachment 2 of t6at is the Construction Management Plan,and Uie • changes that have been made in that are shown in itatics and those were some additions that Bud � � Eytar had wanted and there is also attached to that an updated landscape plan showing the concerns that Steve Anthony had with regard to wildflowers. A copy of these documents are attached hereto and made a part of this record as EXHIBIT"B'. - , `. 1 i�•: Mc Clarke said there were a couple of questions that were left hanging at the end of the last " � meeting. Commissioner[reland specificaily left the meeting saying that he was coocerned that we have some discussion about the length of construction of tUe project;talk about some type of �� time limit to build out on the project;in addition,some discussion about long term obligations . and to whom they are going to be transferred and how that transfer is going 10 work. So in this plan there have been some changes from the concepts that were dealt with before,a lot of word n � something diat needs to be done,and a lot of previous documents that are in flux such as � commission members have in these two attachmenLs are going to go into this document. He pointed out that there are a couple of things that are differenL With regard to the Aspen Consolidated Plan,Clazke said there l�ave been some changes in the ' affordable housing makeup. Primarily there were originally 112 units;there are now I 11 deed restricted units,but there are actualty more employees housed than previously and to a great extent,that has to do witli the reconfiguration of the dorms. W ith the redesign of the ` dormitories,they are housing more people than required and the request is to either not construct . all those units or to use them to offset future housing exaction's. His recommendation would be that they do construct them;he does not think they should have the right not to construct them, but perhaps it would be fair that they could use them to offset future housing shortfalls that might show up through the audit requirement. There is a requirement that we do a housiug audit one yeaz afrer Phase IV is complete 10 see if indeed,the employee generation and the housing (. numbers match up. What the applicant is proposing,is for some reason that tfiey would sfiow that tliey have a shortfall ihat they could use the 13.1 pereent person credit. Commissioner Lamont commented that if the 13.15 extra credit units are represented in what we ' have been looking at for awhile then where are they going to be eliminated from and where do we put them back,etc:? ��' Bob Daniels,representing the applicant,responded that they agree to build them. i` � .. I i i SOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2 SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 29,1997 I ' I;�.�f�� .. . .._... ..... .._........_..,�:��:.��.. � ) � • ' , i -. . ' - �: ��. . + � • � e • � - � .^_._-._ � . - _ ._,. _. _.__ �----� . . y \ �_ _ .._. _..._...��._. � . e,F '�:' `�r:_ - .. ' .___ -�----_ --- " ; -' ,�;': �} �; . r�-��'i. �s.,�: i.-';.A,_ : it�.;#;_�:; Mr.Clarke said the proposal is Uiat these be for Hines and Ski Company employees in the winter ",s�'�'''�� and that in the summer they be used for the Music Association of Aspen. Chairman Tuite said this raises the question then do we want to look at this as a surplus and give ' �> the applicants credit for a potential shortfall in the future or do we want to say"It is what it is", ';.;. and leave it at that? '. Mr.Daniels said their preference would be that if the audits come back and show that there is additional housing that these be appfied before the shortfall in the audit. Chairman Tuite expressed a concem that by helping out the MAA,are we going to recognize ;Y•` '' � "extra employees"when in reality,they are not there year-round. He reminded everyone that , staff recommended that this not be done period,but rather that the project house their people .. year-round that are going to be impacting because ofthis project. : Gideon Kaufman said they have a village they have worked on very hard and if there is a '. shortfall down the line,ratlter than having to pay more money,or rather than having to come up � with a situation where they have to be more housing,it seems ro him that naturally U�ey would get a credit for the surplus Yhat they are willing to build it. The communiry gets the benefit of it, ' but if they have a s[iorifall later on,they should be able to get credit for it. Commissioner Ireland suggested that Board allow them a credit for three quarters because three quarters ofthe units are definitely offsetting employees and the other is just MAA related. '. Mc Daniels responded that for those additional units,they go into the dorm,and based upon the - ; recommendation that has been made,he U�inks this a fair way to deal with it for them. They will ! take 75 percent credit for those additional dorm units or that bodies that go into a dorm. � Chairman Tuite directed staff to work out what it is exactty. � : � ' Lance Clarke referred to another change where the applicants were allowed to reserve ceRain units for Hines and Ski Company employees attd the idea was tliat tiiey would the be sale units � ' for the first sale only. He said the new language states"Upon the subsequent sa1e,the units will � ; be first offered to qualified Hines/Ski Company employees by right of first refusal, and then to � any qualified employee". t � 1. . Commissioner Lamont asked what die logic is behind this proposal? C I' � � Gideon Kaufman responded that the fogic behind that is that one of the things they are trying to do,is accommodate tlie traffic issue,by keeping their employees on site. 4 Chairman Tuite suggested that it be(imited to Aspen Highlands employees,but if they are talking abouY a Ski Company that works at S�owmass that mutes the issue. i Bob Daniels explained that the Ski Company sometimes move their employees from mountain to mountain,but they would try to work with staff to develop some language that first priority goes towards someone that would be working at that mountain,if that is the desire of the Board,in addition,they woutd need to meet the employee housing authority minimum standards;income ' occupancy,net asset va(ue,no additional property,etc. - _ ' .' 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 3 SPECIAL MEETiNG OCTOBER 29,1997 � � i. i _ �}�,�.: �. � 4 ,,� k ' 1 ..� . . , � �; - F i � . � . / ' ,, ' . �." - .... ..__.� ... '- .__ .,. .�. . .'_"._._..�--. .a} � . �:, _ ., . ,;,,-� _..�. ... . - ,... .. , , .. . � . � a`�:: �� .�:��:�;� ,:,,,:�,�;;,; -�;:� Lance Clarke exptained that another change is tliat tha Hines/Aspen Skiing Company reserve the right to lease all seven rental units to qualified Hines or Aspen Skiing Company employees as a �. �.y top priority. The resolution before said that they wanted to lease two of the units and now they y�•�='- �. are asking for a!1 seven. • . It was agreed that this proposal would be acceptable. ' Lance Clarke explained that another change has been made to page 21 under the Definition of 9�r'.'. Activity Envelope. He said they have estabtished for every lot buitding envetopes and activity ,,:-r,�" envelopes. All buildings will be within the envelopes,but they established activity envelopes ` ' because there are some cases where driveways are going to have to go through some sloped areas � �^ and there is going to have be retaining walls and typically,anytime a retairting wal!is bailt you �'� ` have to go through the Board of Adjustment to get a variance because anything over 30 inches in ` the setback is considered a structure and requires a variance. Therefore,this language has been (y. `. added so the developers don't have to go before the Board of Adjustment every time this 7- happens. � He recommended tliat the language state"The activity envelope encompasses the building ' . ' envelope. Driveways,grading,landscaping,and retaining wafls may take place within the !.';? activity envelope. Buildings,sheds,pools may be conshucted only within the building envelope. '�c Retaining walls located outside Uie building envelope,wiUiin the activity envelope,shall not �'�i exceed six feet in height,provided lots 9 and]0 in the Thunderbolt neighborhood may have �,';i higher retaining walls. Where there are retaining walls,there will be stepped-back or terrace • wall structures with planting pockets where grade changes exceed six feet. Decorative walls - located outside the building envelope,within the activity enveiope not used for retainage area, are prohibited." With respect to berms,Clarke said the language will be changed to read"Berms located outside the building envelope,but within the activity anvelope,will not exceed two to one slope or three feet in height" The idea being in both instances,is to avoid the walled off concept along the street. � Chairtnan Tuite questioned if you could add a five foot fence to the top of the berm7 It was agreed tUai language will be fudher amended by adding language which states: "The total height of the berm and fence will not exceed six feet" j Glena Horn stated that the applicants and staff will come up with an additional sheet that shows just activity and building envelopes where they drop the topo lines out so it will read much better. Mr.Clarke said other than those main points,the other concerns he has with the plan,are primarily word smiting that they are going to have to change for the final draft particularly with respect to response to General Submission conditions which refer to specific appendices and . speciftc things that have or have not happened they are now in a different appendices and maybe they have already taken place,and that all tteeds to be adjusted. But as far as the primary � conceptual issues that he had,had to do with the change in the housing situation.He said the only additional concern he has is with the design of the afFordab(e housing units. He dces not think tl�e units meet the dialogue with the design of the$ase Village. Therefore,he suggested to � Uie project planners that they talk to the architect about that,and he has made some changes. He �; . , referred to page 89 of the plan which shows the design of these units. �A�- � �. ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 4 SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 29,1997 � . ,� � . �; i / ' �`� V t�, � � . � � . :j..� . 1 . � . . . —- -----, �Y. — . .._ .' ""_ . . . . � _T��. .. __. �_ ... ' . a.� .�_. �_. -�"�;` �;� , - .. a ...� , W tc4.�a.�ef.f i I. _ . � . � _. e.r ' , �'��- �� >�; ' �`�r:i�;�7��};.,�. r y .`, Commissioner Lamont said in reviewing the phasing aspect of the project,when Phase(is " addressed,it looks like it is more than just tlte basic infrastracture,but in addition,there is focus ��+� `; on the Maroon Bowl neighborhood. She questioned when the lots in tltis neighborhood would be !' ' '�� saleable7 'y��' �.;' Mr.Daniels responded that these lots woald have the opportunity to go to the real esiate market t,'� - ; after final plat. 77iere is tto requirement,because this project is less than a l00 units,tlie infrastructure Isas to be complete prior to offering the lots. He said with respect to buildittg .'.;,� . permits,they would have to deal with life,health and safety issues,which are typically powey •y:'``:; ,' water,sewer,fire depathnent access,ete. He said their plan is if they are able to proceed in �=#�>;�- '` April,is to initiate construction on Yhe parking structure,Buitding 7,which is skier services,and �'_;�.. . in the Viilage core,Bui�ding 6,which is the ticketing o�ce,and a portion of Building 4;try to F,, -; :: . get the skier services built in one complete season. So they are not able to initiate any housing i''.'' ' construction or any habiYual construction in the first year,but they are hopefu!to do it in the second yeac �'�� . �':' . Commissioner Farris said she would like to see some employee housing come on line at the k same time ihat building permits for free-market units are issued. ' Mr.Daniels said what they have anticipated is that when they get into the Subdivision �'r Improvements Agreement and start to talk about obligations of the deve�oper,that tlaey will start �,�' - to deal with timing issues and measures oFsecurity for execution of those obligations;bonding for some specific public improvements. He thinks at tfiat time,they will have a discussion with the Board as to whether or not they consider affordable housing to be a public improvement They feel that prior to coming to the Board to discuss this issue,that it woold be more appropriate to discuss it with the County Attomey,and they will take this concern into mind l when they startthese discussions. 3! �_, ' Commissioner Farcis referred to the Construction Ma�agement Plan,which]imits deliveries to �� the Base Village from 8:00 am to 830 am and no deliveries from 2:SOpm to 3:36 pm. She said ` her concern is,is what time all that construction traffic has to be on Highway 82 to be there at �• �j . �I 8307 !� � 4 eBob Daniels said their concern regarded the school and the intersection because of their � ! neighbors. F i � ( Chairman Tuite questioned if there is an optimum time for the highway and the intersection? i � ," Mr.Daniets responded that they have had some discussions with general contractors who are t acutety aware of che issues associated wid�deiivering material. And their first question to them 1, was when in the off hours can we deliver and stock pile raw materials. Therefore,he thinks from i both of their standpoints,they have a Iot to gain there because material costs are more expensive ` . for them if they are sitting on the highway. : Chairman Tuite suggested stockpiling materials on the site and utilize die weekends for delivery � � wlien traffic is significant[y tower when you get closer to town. � -- I BOARD QF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 5 SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 29,1997 i�'i I ' . _.. . . . .� .. _.. .. . ... . . .. . _ . ... .. . ... __ . . .. . ._..r".i} ` .� - / U . ... .... , . ��- . 1 . . ' ' ' � `�}� ��'' � � .� � .. � �'. ' . , . `. ))) . f . . ._ 1.'� � . . . . .._. .. . . , � . �.•� � . . . . ' • ' �..�►�—_'.--�---� _... _._.�__.._.. . . A.� ; Ir��, . s.° Mr.Daniels commented that they had a two-tiar approach to this issue. They had a first tier of �`�='��% jr:,t,�. ' trying to address Maroon Creek Road,the ietersection and the neighbors. The second tier was �t,��f�,.�t�,:� those stockpiles. They thought delivery times would deal with child safety,peak tra�c �� -'" . associated with parents to and from the school,and also,with the ski area as welt. And they put Y.; .; these times in here realizing that as the school adjust their times,they will have to be flexible,in i� addition,there are review provisions in here with the Co�nty Engineer on an annualized basis. �:�; .. The stockpiling was trying to address the kind of larger,outside of the neigltborhood issues � •�'_ relative to Highway 82. Also,tbey 6ave put some specific requirements on their contractors _' about van pooling,cac pooling,and them having enforcement measures in dieir eontracts. Chairman Tuite said he thinks the neighborhood's position is also crucial. p�'':^. � ::�t:.r�`<. Mr.Daniels said they witl certainly include the superitttendent of schools and a member of the Castle Maroon Caucus on the list of their annua[review. A discussion ensued as to whether or not it tivould be feasible to have a batch plant on site. , " f ' Mr.Daniels wl�at they wanted to do is maka sure that they had a contractor on board who was ` i,7� competent to address this issue,and when that contractor is on board,deal wiUi the Counry and � ' deal with tlte neighborhood and come up with a plan. ` . +': , Glenn Hom suggested that tf�e applicants and staff work on the issue of delivery traffic,and iry �r. to refine it,based on the Board's comments today,and work with their contractor to revise this in a form that is more acceptable prior to them getting excavation permits. x� Commissioner Ireland suggested that the County Engineer have the ability to look at this and � give his approval or to say that the window should be larger or smaller. It was agreed that the fifrh paragraph on the second page be revised to say"Prior to the first ? construction season program and each season program thereafter,there will be a meeting witli ` RFTA,the SherifT's O�ce,Schoot Superintendent,the neigltborhood,the Pitkin County - S Engineer and the developer to review the work program." � Commissioner Ireland suggested that the on site batch plant idea be discussed in these meetings ' also. ti �� Sob Daniels said his concern would be if someone in the neighborhood did not like the batch � plant,after it was placed on the site. He said he would like to impress upon this Board that they � ; have taken contractors to task about their schedule,the batch plant,and all the other ideas,but if (� t' they set a course in the beginning of the year(April as proposed)i.e,a batch plant or stock piling t ! materials,if they change that in June,it would be a huge impact to them. � ` ( Chairman Tuite said wliat is being talked about is thousands and t[iousands of truck loads of eoncrete. And if you are a neighbor trying to get in and out of there,a batch plant that could � . r work at certain times of the day and complete the project versus the truck traffiq the batch plant ` would be the best solution. He thinks the batch plant could be narrowed down to a speciftc � season or two. Y ,` .. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 6 SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 29,1997 �t � _ 1 � f . .____ ..� . _ . . _ .. _... ,. . . .._. . . y _ .. _.. .. . . .t�� / _ ,:f��,. � � f � 4 �( . ""� . . . �. ' - t�; �'� i .�. . � ' � , i . i k. . . �_.` . . '_. '_'__.—_. — ...._._ .__ .. _._..—__._--; . ;�a�i i, , r. ��,� t��' �.,�'�,'�'i.�).:?~,` King Woodward,representing the Maroon/Creek Caucus,commented tliat in talkiog with a �'�,'•h��`�-�;�,, number of people who live up in the Maroon Creek Vatley,they wou(d rather put up with a y;' ,;' shorter period time of construction than spreading it out over a number of years. So they might � have to put up with a batcl�plant rather tltan have the number of concrete trucks that are going }''' `,. up and down the valley. They would rattier put up with a shorter period of inconvenience rather �� x a than a longer time of inconveniertce. He said one or two persons may come in and object to a `•'�`' �.�: batch plant,but he diinks if the plant is shut down,because of one or two individuals in the � '. subdivision,the major construction will never be completed. Rather,he thirtks the Board should j;�`: ,, listen to the majority of the people up in diat area. It was agreed that tlie developers will participate with the naighbors and in looking at t6e impacts �� ,� . and willing to work with the County Engineer on these issues. "`'`;•'r' ` ,�. Commissioner Lamont emphasized that there are perimeters being set here and these need to be ��;;' ;:. • taken into consideration when the developers are working with their contractor. Also,with y�" . regard to a batch plant being on site,the materials still need to be Uauled there,iiowever,maybe �',�' they can be hauled up there at different Yimes. ��.;'� M.L.Tucker,with Western Mobile,questioned what process would be used relative to the .. creation of a batch plant7 C[�airman Tuite said he would tike to see the t7exibility in tlie resolution. And then when tl�e '"r�p ..�T actual discussion occurs with the County Engineer,the neighborhood and the other entities takes ,i place,ihere will be the ability to make that decision and not come back to the Board. So he � . hopes this flexibility is built into this program. % Ms.Tucker said they would like to be able to be included in that discassion. Sfie said this is a new concept for them and they have placed portable batch plants in various key locations;they ' worked on Coors Field for example. But as Commission members are awaze,they have been working with the Board and have relocated their batch plant to the Elam site. She said they would like the County,as a whole,to not preclude them from being a participant in this ' developmenh the cost of operating the existing piant and truck the cement in versus Uie cost of putting in a portable plant. ,r,' Mr.Daniels said he does not think there is any resolution here that there will or will not be a batch plant on this site. He thinks what he continues to hear From this Board is a good idea, � discussion about the idea,and asking the applicants to talk with the neighborhood about the idea. ' He has not heard a commitment on the part of the developer nor a requirement on the part of the j County for this to be a patt of the development. He thinks this is an option that needs to be weighed both from a financial standpoint,from a neighborhood impact,etc. Chairman Tuite advised Ms.Tucker that the Board is allowing the flexibility for a 6atch plant to be included,but there are additional talks that need to take plaoe. Ms.Tuoker questioned if the batch plant is approved would it have to go througB a special � , review process? Lance Clarke responded that through this process,we F�ave 6een doing atl kinds of special �? reviews we are just adding a special review use,if we add this. It did not come up at the ii�" � � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 7 SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 29,1997 �' r � I _.._.,. . _ � , l _ _ � _ . ,:�� ,. , ��`� � , — . - . . . - � f�� :. � � ; � �.. .�1,.. . . • 1 • .. � . � ' ._y . . ` �_T��_ . . ._._. �_.__ � ...�._. ._� .._..._.�._�__ , a.� �)ti :. .`�._ — ' � , ��,x`�:'. ��s��. . ;�.r;�.�.�:�� :. ' ,tit V�,,,#;`i.;?: Planning and Zoning Commission level so when they were looking at the specia{review issues y�' -`"�, of Nordic skiing,and retai!uses in the zone district,we were not talking about batch plants. ;;�,�,. _i. �''d Commissioner Lamont said what is being talked about is a temporary use versus a pennanent " USO. �'y.°�.•.i It was agreed that iFa batch plant is agreed upon then there wilf have to be a determination made �'`' �� as to whether or not it has to come through a special review prceess. Staff was asked to look into . this issue. "Y',�:i: �.- �:;-.�::r..'-. Lance Clarke proceeded to review the changes suggested in the Resolution. He referred to Condition No.3 regarding the plan. He explained that there have been changes in the number of ;��;.`�, affordable housing units which went from 112 to 111 and there are some slight differences in ;� .' '= ' types of units so those numbers wUere it says 39 Category dorm units Uiat is now 37 Category 1 `-' • units. Where it says 23 single family Category 4 units that will now be 22,and there is an it ., addition of 1 single Family Category 4 three bedroom unit. The 28 rownhouse Category 3 is the �:;y'.,,. same. The eiglrt category 1 and eight Category 2 multi-family one bedroom are the same. Then � ;;;�' there will be three Category 3 one bedroom rental units. The three Category 3 three bedroom �L - sale units aze gone;there are now four Category 3 two bedroom rental units;the rest of the numbers all stay the same. �r:, ,,:r . Y h Mr.Clarke said the next change,that has been suggested,is on page 5 of the Resolution after the ` '•�T.f recitals in the"Now ThereFore be it Resolved by the Board,that it does hereby grant Detailed : ��j . Submission,Pianned Unit Development,1041 Environmentai Hazard Review,and Special P �j !. Review approval for multi-family and retail uses a couple of approvals need to be added that are ,,� I a part of this so this resolution says the same thing that the General Submission Resalution dces so after and Special Review Approval for multi-family and retail uses,staff would like to add � "and as TDR receiving site for 20 single family dwelling units". Also,something the applicant �i' ' realized that needed to be added to this,is there will be subdivision of this property with respect to tlie retail commercia!component as well as Yhe tourist accommodations. Therefore,a - Subdivision Exemption for condominium as part of this Resolution. He suggested added a Condition No.4 that states"The app(icant must file a condominium maps in accordance with Colorado Revised Statute Section 38-33-I OL He noted that tliere are several cases throughout the Resolution where it says"Prior to Detailed '� � Subdivision approval by the BOCC." He explained that these things have all been done that this is what they have been working on for the last few months. So he suggested that these items be k re-written to say"Tlie phasing plan that clearly identifies the ridership threshold on the existing Castle Maroon Roazing Fork Transit Agency Route that will trigger a requirement for the applicant to make a cash payment to RFTA for the purpose and operation of one additional bus on the route,will be a documented in the Aspen/Highlands Village Detailed Submission � Consolidated Plan." � •. . � Mr.Clarke said the next sentence will change,instead of saying the agreement wi►I stipulate,it says the agreement stipulates. 'i Mr.Clarke said the same thing in No.5 when it says prior to Detailed Subdivision by the BOCC �`�; that will be changed to just say"The applicant and the Counry have agreed upon an Operation "� , �� i �- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 8 SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 29,1997 L "' �!''� .! . .: . � _._ ,� . i ' ` t � � � . , . .'i , �, � � . ��' . �---^-- ---�_ _ . � ... _ _ _ -- ---- --_—� :`"�i ...__ � y{�� . ��n 1 �� -__ . .. —.�. . . . ..Y�'. _ i`kl�i1 1.��l:.�. ... � . . ... . ''�'� . . -�i. �4-�Ln<.1 .�...I�...:i �f( � ...>1 N:1.<.v, u e..i.r..r..r -.+..<. _� ,��. a�,x�f.�: fi, ��` �:: �: �:,.-�'.u'.r • !�*r. .,,.�e; ',., and Services Phasing Flan for a non demand dial a ride transit system to be operaYed by the ' �., .c� applicant as documented in the Aspen Highlands Village Detailed Submission consolidated plan. ,� � •� With respect to Condition No.6 with associated with the 135 designaYed spaces,that agreement ��' �, t is actually part of the AF-SKI Master Plan that the 8oard recently approved. So this will now `. read"The Aspen Skiing Company and the County,have agreed upon an operations and service �'~' f. phasing plan for a remote parking skier shuttle service to be operated behveen Aspen Highlands �:�r. .�, ,, Vilfage and 13S new designated remote parking spaces to be established at Buttermilk Ski Area, I�,:?.;. : as dceumented in the Aspen Highlands Ski Area AF-SKI Master Plan approved by the BOCC on October22,1997" 4'r:':r' � �,::;�::. With respect to Condition No.7,this traffic transit paricing monitoring system plan is also part of �:<-' - the AF-SRI Master Plan so this will read"The applicant and the County have agreed on a ' - comprehensive tra�c transit parking monitoring plan system to be undertaken by the appficant. t,�. 'I'his plan was approved by the BOCC on October 22,1997 as part of the Aspen Highlands AF- � ' SKI Master Plan. The plan will 6e included in tfie Aspen Highlands Village Detailed f�`�' . Submission Consolidated Plan". � Commissioner Ireland questioned how much money of the$650,000 for infrastructure y� �, improvements along Maroon Creek Road will be left over for the intersection,after the road is y:'� putin? 1 • Mr.Daniels responded that for tlte intersection itself,tfiere was$319,000. For the Maroon Creek Road,the bikepath and aU diat associated work is$290,000 for a total of$609,000 leaving about $4Q000 ptus the$35a,000 from the Moote project. So there will be$609,000 for the intersection,U�e lanage and the bike paths. Therefore,there will be$391,000 left out of Yhe first million dollars. Then there is an additional contribution from Hines consisting of$350,000 to _, jump start the entrance to Aspen solution for the Maroon Creek intersection. � Commissioner lreland says the problem he has with this paragraph is that it says"The applicant is also committed to a donation of$350,000 for long range improvements to the Castfe/Maroon Creek intersection as part of the Entrance to Aspen FEIS. He said this does not make any sense because the improvements are not part of a federal clearance document. So it does not tell us ` when and how that money can be used because the FEIS does not have a range of alternatives ( and doesn't specify any one of them. The record of decision wip ultimately specify an alternative and so tliis is just ambiguous. He suggested that the language read to say""I'l�e ' $350,000 is going to be donated at the time of Final Plat and then designate who can decide how � the money is going to be spenP'. {: � Mr.Daniels said as a part of t6eir setvice agreement,there is a discussion about how Lhe Counry � and the City will mutually agree on liow Uiose funds are used because the intersection is in the - City. Hittes has promoted an interim solution and the question is how mucli does that interim �, ' solution cost? They have never requested to tlte City or the Counry that this is a solution that must occur. They didn't see other applicants presenting solutions so they wanted to provide a ° solution that worked and had money attached to it, At final plat they are required to provide to the County the$65Q000 wiih specific improvements attached to it,and he would say everything ,, above the intersection is required to come out of that money and everything below a]ine,in the intersection is still discretionary. ' ' - ' _ � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 9 SPECIAL MEETIiVG OCCOBER 29,1997 . ... . ... . . . . . .. .__.. . . .un . : i ,� F .i ^ . . . . � �' � : . �1• . � ' � � . � ., . . ,�.. �_.. ... ._ — _ -- -- __ _-- ------ i.�P '';;'. . . ,. `�---------------______-. ..�_ _ . l^�Y��'!. ,,,�_`.%�;y k•; .l�,`.'.�y;n��!��,r Bud Eylar,County Engineer,said it is his position that the$650,d00 starts at the intersection and '. �G��;:`'�.'�• �u .... Iteads toward Highlands or starts at Highlands and heads down towards the intersection. '� '" .,fi',: Commissionec Ireland said the reason he is concerned now,is that tl�ere is a possibitity that the ti a record of decision will clear something that could be done imminentfy,if CDOT adopts our ��`' _:y�` ,•��. oompromise and says you can build things common to hoth and tlien decide whaY is common to - . both. He does not want there to be any doubt that we can go forward with that as a Ahase 1 and �- ' � using this money as some soR of contribution of getting that done, [n essence,he said if we get j`t' the record of decision,and it clears that,and we have this money and U�e City agrees,there is the • possibility of doing the intersection improvements in the first or second year of this whole g.`;�, �. construction business. .�. . Chairman Tuite said Mick's question is can we jump start this? We don't want to spend money ,�`-'^ twice,but we know we have to s end somethin so wfiat is real! availabte from the Count 's `�" '` " p 8 Y Y X�::• . part that can be spent without consulting the City. "�'' .�s : King Woodward commented that it is the homeowner's concern that they are going to get into a ', r!;A, ,_ building season at the same time the improvements are being made to the intersection. ;r�' {i�� Mr.Daniels said they are willing to work on this condition in whatever way meets the needs. He thinks there is a wide range of opportunities and sonce rea(ly mioor improvements that can be ��;,� made out there,in the interim,tliat would go a long way. '�' i`� � e ' It was agreed that the condition would be changed striking the language as part of the Bntrance � �� to Aspen and say"$350,000 for long range improvements to the Castle/Maroon intersection as � ` � agreed to by the BOCC and Aspen City Council." Clarlce referred to Condition No.]0. He said this was a Pianning and Zoning recommendation '� which says"Tlte P]anning and Zoning Commission strongly encourages Utat Yhe pr•�posed short '� . tetm improvements be made forthwit6,and the County aad City work together to devise a mutllally acceptable and timely solution fo the on-going problem." He questioned if the board wished to keep this fanguage in. It was agreed that this condition will remain as written. ` Clarke refeaed to Condition No.14 which states diat the applicant sha(f consult wifh RFTA prior � - to Detailed Sabmission approval to renew the plan for transit facilities and that has been done so he recommends that this Condition be stricken. � ;� It was agreed that the Condition would be eliminated. Clarke referred to Condition No.18. He said the language"initial sale"needs to come out +t� because we have agreed that they can sale those homes to qualified employees and it does say ' that they must meet the minimum requirements of the Housing Authority. . �r � Commissioner Ireland suggested language whicl�says"In a!1 cases,the deed requirements ofthe Housing Authority must be mek" ' � �i�_ � It was agreed that the tanguage would be amended accordingly, � _ _ t -- �; �. $OARD OF COUNTY COMMiSS10NERS 10 SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 29,1997 1,.� it=, � . _ _ �� ; , _ .._..,.... � � ^ —. S '' , . , r� :' �I . • + ' , _ .. - ' . '-,. . . T"'"""_' - __ , q.i .��. -;: � ., .aYSa��:. ;!:r;�.� . . � ��.'. ��x �- � �..';�t�S, ti�,,:.':�`�;ry";. y,�•�� Clarke referred to Condition No.20 which says the dorm plans of the dormitory units sUall be "��., .,. reviewed by Nie Housing Office for their recommendation to Detailed Submission. They have ;;t:, �; reviewed that so the language wil!read"Floor plans for the dormitory units shall be developed � � � as reviewed and approved by the Housing Office." ��'� �. -,� Clarke referred to Condition No.24,wl�ich says tl�at affordable housing sliall be constructed and l'� �' '�. made available according to the pl�asing plan as presented in the written descripYion, He said appendix 14 refers to another document so the language will state"as presented in Nie written ��y,..<`._%� - description in the Aspen Highlands Village Detailed Submission Consolidated Plan. �.' .:.:s. `.,. :s� It was agreed that the ianguage be changed accordingly. �'�`' ;' -`�',.':;;� . ,}�. , Clarke referred to Condition No.25 whicl�says that prior to Detailed Submission by the BOCC, � �'.�, "• the applicant shatl provide a wiltingness to serve water,that's dona so that condition can be }'`.,:;, eliminated. 'ti': It was agreed that the Condition could be eliminated. Clarke referred to Condition No.26 which says prior to approval of Detailed Submission by the <?A : BOCC,the applicant shall provide evidence that the project will be served with public sewer,as �I;n provided by die Aspen ACSD,this was discussed previously. He said the applicanks are in active �� negotiations with the sanitation district abouf what costs are going to be applied to the Highlands �1' � ' Base Village and so this language has been changed to read"Prior to approval of final plaY' � i because ihey have not come to an agreement yet,but there is no question that they will be served i by the ACSD. � Clarke referred to Condition No.10 on the next page which has to do with prior to approval,the land manager approving the weed corttrol plan,that has been done so the language will read"The . AHB weed control for areas to be disturbed shatl be as approved by the County Land Manager and documented in the Aspen Highlands Village Detailed Submission Consolidated Plan. Ctark referred to Condition No.32 with respect to project lighting level standards and �s; timitations,the language shall state"shall comply with the Aspen Higfilands Viilage betailed Submission Consolidated Plan." Clark referred to Condition No.33. He said there is a revised landscaping plan,which has beert submitted and reviewed and approved by the land manager and the Community Development Deparlment, Therefore,the language will read"The revised landscaping plan shall be included ; . in tfie Aspen Highlands Village Decailed Submission Consolidated Plan." The undedined statement about wildflowers species will remain as part of the condition. { � Clark referred to Condition No.11 39(c)which says prohibit landscape lighting except to the � � extent necessary for safety purposes staff decided they did not want the community development making a determination as to when a landscaping feature needed to be lighted for safety purposes. So the language was changed to read"prohibit landscape lighting." ' �f F rc ` _- , .. . , IT� . �. . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS[ONERS I 1 SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 29,2997 �; • . . .. � �i� � �. . ..._. ._� .. ... . . . . . . .. . ... . . .. . . . _._ . . . . .... .._.._.,_._ .: .' . / � � - � y ��. . . � �: . �� . � .� . .. __, i . . � � - •.^ � . . . • � � � �..�r,.�.� --..-� ._.. "".. __._. � _�.... .__ .... ._____...�_.�_.� • , t O_b .� ^ .,;.�(: �>. .�y , -�Ml� .,�.F '� � �::.:� ;� '.:1� :. ._� , ::L71 , .;!�Y.• �_./.Alk:•..�.t..s.Y�-:��err.J.w.r,.�.a.«. �� ...... . n... .... .. . .. . k�h��'". Fi r SI:�:�1�'S��. �`'.i.��s iy'.{; ��-''��.; . �:. With respect to Condition No.40 which says tree removal will be limited to approved buiiding � ' envelopes and platted driveways,driveways have not been platted so the word"platted"has been ^' ''• efiminated. �� .:r; With respect to Condition No.42 which says that prior to Detailed Submission approval of a �, � '. beach mark elevation will be established,the bench mark is going to be established in front of f;�.;�,�; . the dumpster and the Charmanie so it is going to precisely be given a legal description and pin - put in place and it has been agreed where that is going to happen and it will say"at fnal plat." -�� '�� Y''` Bob Daniels said witU respect to the lighting,they have addressed this issue in their plan and �';i� ' proceeded to read the language. He says he doesdt know what the definition at least in dte (':i�` Board's mind,of what landscaping lighting is. But in his opinion,it is up-lighting,and so with j.;.'=',t • the other illumination standards that they went through so specifically,he does not want there to : be a confusion about what landscape lighting is. i-�,_ �� • After a discussion,it was agreed diat the applicant and staff shall work on the language in the E i; condition to specify only lighting necessary for safety purposes related to steps going though the �, landscapin�. ;x Clarke continued by referring to Condition No.12 on page 40,which is another prior to BOCC y.'� Detailed Submission approval. He said those concepts for proposed architectural guidelines have been completed so that language will read"The concepts for proposed architecturai � guidelines,for the single family units,are as documented in the Aspen Highlands Village • Detailed Consolidated Plan." � With respect to Condition No,52 on page 13,the language shall state"The Detailed Construction Traffic Parking Management Phasing Plan will be as documented in the Aspen Highlands Village Detailed Submission Consolidated Plan." The issues that it will address wil) �i remain. ' With respect to Condition No.50 on page 14,the applicant has already made a donaYion for the � parks land dedication so this condition will change to say"Requirements for schools,land � dedication or cash in lieu fee shall be as per tl�e land use code." Then add a new condition that says"Parks dedication shall be as depicted on Drawing P-2 ofthe Aspen Highlands Village Detaited Submission Consolidated Plan Map Document" - Clarke said the applicant has asked that they be given an extraordinary period of vesting and has asked that a condition be added that says"The Aspen Highlands Village Detailed Submission �Consolidated Plan slial(have vesting for a period of five years from approval of this Resolution". !: He explained that the normal vesting period is three years. � Bob Daniels said they asked for an additional vesting period of 10 years,but staft's • recommendation is five years. � �:; After a discussion,it was agreed that the vesting period will be left as five years,but substantial will be interpreted after the completion of Phase 1 of the construction schedule,in addition,this f language will be documented in the plan.Staff was asked to work with the applicants on the �! ' wording of this condition. ' � - � . 1 — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS[ONERS 12 SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 29,1997 , ____ _ __ _ ', . . _ _ �r,,, . � x 9 �� " �:� �. � V: . � , . � .. ��.• , . ' , . ._ . h ._ _'_ . . _._..__—...�._.—, ' ` �_ . .___..__ . -� . , 1 ��r� _ -. ,.:- .,._._ -, � ,J��t , .. --- - - _ _ : , w�- .s+4�1.�. 1..0 I�...:i�.' •a. .:MV .:Ai t ..�` . .1, .. _. ' . .. .. .. .. "`r"SCn:. . a n•4T.nvtefr.,.,�db..q....�u..s�L•aiy��.y..r.re.�.'s.. •rs:...>�} y }� �y'.. �i l- , µ�i�.�Y�'L'�;' "{,. Clarke said!�e recommends an additional condition fhat says"The effective date of this �, .s Resolution shall be the same as the effective date of the Ordinance Rezoning Aspen Highlands '4.� Village,Ordinance Mo.97-_. y',�:.�, � ' - Gideon Kaufman recommended that language be added to the Ordinance which talks about the �.•� '` .�! effective date,be 30 days after publication of the ordinance. f.��.,'' . r Commissioner[reland asked the applicants if they are satisfied with all these recommended I�9.'�"'`"''" conditions of approval? ;�:,�`',. Bob Daniels said they are comfortable with the conditions of approval. i`'� l,�;.';.':: . Commissioner Lamont reFerred to Condition No.23.She suggested that this condition be t ' referenced so that it can explained in detail,in the Aspen Highlands Village Consolidated Plan. �• It was agreed that an additional condition will be added which says that"All dimensional � requirements of floor area are spelled out in the"Aspen Highlands V illage Consolidated Plan:' � . Chairman Tuite opened the hearing to public comment. �� King Woodward complimented the applicant and the County for a job well done. �,'` ,1 _ ' T7ie Board thanked Mr.Woodward for his padicipation. � T'here being no further comment,he closed the public hearing and brought the matter back to the ; Board for actinn. , Chairman Tuite thanked Mr.Clarke for truly an exceptional job on this very detailed,very compJex application. Commissioner Ireland moved to amend fhe Resolution per the discussion fead by Lance Clarke including the amendment proposecl by the applicant. Commissioner Lamont seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. ORDINANCE RANTIN uF�nivmr�ciF T ASpEN HI FII,pNi1S VILLACF SITE FROM AF- KI.ARl.R-3n eF_i Tn eu_i vrm eun n_an nrm u_i c vim,R_�S P3ZL> AHO,AF SKI,AHPUD,AHO AND AMFNDIN(' nrFirTeL O m17'Y Z4ffilYG MAP-MOTION TO APPR(JVE Lance Clarke said there have been no changes to the Ordinance since the last reading of this � docume�t. • Glenn Horn referred to a document titled the Aspen Highlands Village Detailed Submission Consolidated Plan which reFers to every parcel to be rezoned and explains what the will be y' rezoned to and any acreage involved tliere. �" Chairman Tuite opened the hearing to public comment. There being no comment,he closed the �a� , - �:. � public comment section of the meeting and broughi the matter back to the Board for action. �A-- �� I BQARA OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 13 SPEC[AL MEETING OCTOBER Z9,1997 �'� y:,, r:;r,;.;.' i�`�t :,,� _ _ , i . � . . -- �,.r� �.- 6 � �; –' , ' ' � i; - _. � !� . . � � .__ ...� ___' ..._—_""_._"'� . . �,y.. . �_.. . _ —_. _'_ .----_ _ , 1 r�k .�;- `�-- � �.�' � `��3'�'r�{�rna �, J,!i^s r ,,a; p ';�;j� 1 � !,��. f_1! � e'}„s ` fir..�..- :�n . � N J r y.�ic, t�r c4c°'-�'+M.rwir33f:3�'W..la6_�.�-..¢,1_,.�� _. j '�yi i �'Y+: � � ,r,. �''j: . �s"�;��s ,:. Gideon Kaufman asked that tanguage be added to the Ordinance that the effective date will be 30 days after publishing of the rezoning ordinance. .`'�� '., Commissioner Ireland moved to amend the ordinance accordingly. Commissioner Lamont 1 '��-'% seconded tNe motion. Motion passed unaniroousiy. �' '' � Commissioner Harper moved spproval of the Ordinance as amended. Commissioner �:�,j��`�' Ireland seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. �j'`":`� � %:'-�,.; � . Comrnissioner Ireland moved to approve the Resolution as amended. Commissioner Harper seconded the motion. Motion passed with four yea votes. - ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 5:10 PM. � :� �. I I' �. � `, �.i ( . � 1 I i f�'' ) } i 1. tj. ` h � � . ._._....__.-. i )� k 1 � ;�':'': � 1 1 BOARD qF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (4 SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 29,1997 '% ; !, 'j t �';,' _ . tt;:,..'>�:.> . ........... ....._..____.. . . _ . ... . . _._"__-__._....—_ _. �5 . . .._:_,,..� . / . ,� .�... . �. .. . . ,... � ' . .._.... Tr' -" __.. ...-..,.. ..,.� � l'.,- ».� . _ _ . . r� �J�j_.. � - ' .. . . .. " . • ' . . . . _... �:, t �: . .'. .. . .. i.;,. '.:�. . i . . . � � ' _ �� - .. . . _ � � . . ' � � . � . . ! ' . .. - ��}\.. � . . _.._._____ . _'_—___^..._"'_'_�..__� . , ' �TM�! a. :,:��„ :,.<r` . i e`. ,;� �°:i ��a'~��i: 5 cfi�uy Submi ''��• t�. ;i�' �". �� ette Jones 'y'•' '� ' lerk to the Board of County j 'ssionecs �: •�—•�y .e,.. , . s f�:}: �. ,,, ��-::...: s�u Tu�r�, ;:.::. . Boazd of County Commissioners `�r,`'�~� ... .� 4�,:%5 M1! Y�(:: h.�. ,�q ;. ,; � � s 1 ; �; `.-�' �h ] ! t 2 i . _. ....__._...� . . 4 } 5 i 1 • �. submitted for approval 12-03-97 pcjmj/ww/glminutes/1997/10-29-97 � � `�'� ! � 1 i � !� {� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMTSSIONERS 15 SPECIAL MEETIIVG OCTOBER 29,1997 ! • ��! ? .-'__.__�_. .__ ,�,7 � ::._..,..t.---'.___._..,__._.._ i ,..-.......____ . .. . ._ . __.__..... - ,..-:..� . . + , � /. . . ,_ . _:!; , , ��' / � i1,:�t /� . . . � . ' I . ��'F- y. . . . ` � !'::� � . � . ' .. . . . „ . . .. ' ` . .: . . - . . �, - . . . � � __... .1:+ ' . . . ,-� . . - . . ' . .. - , . . . .. . .. ..;: ... . , . i ' � . . . � . - �. � . . ! � , . ��" ` .. . . . __'`__�__ . . __'_._.._'_ __'" . , -; - . � . ,�A � _ ' �` - -- --___-- � � , ,� ,�g . �H ri 4 . �d.�'r7 Er�x,' : �,�., .g,,:`fk,.. • �:: MEMORA,IVDUD'I - i� TO: . Board of County Commissioners ` :�� THROUG$: Cindy Houben,Community Deveiopment Director r��'�' � �i � FROM: Lance Clazk��eputy Duector � ;�.::{ RE: rlspen Fiightands Village Detailed Subdivision Review i,:_ , (Contiaued 2nd Reading,Detailed Submission SQecial Review) . (Conrinued?nd Reading,Rezoning Ordinancel !;•: DATE: October 39. 1997 � ' NOTE:YOti rL=Y WISH T�BRLVG l�I�,TERIAI,S PREVIOliSLY DISTRIBITTED ON.JiTVE 6,JiJNE 30,3ULY 16;SEPTEbffiER 10_,SEPT'E_I�IBER 3�,1997 i REQiJEST:The anpticant;s requesring SubdivisionrPG�betailed Suodivisian approva!tor a i, . � mixed use project at the base oY Hi�hlands Ski Area..Conceptual Submission approval�vas�anted i to the project by the Boazd of Councy Commissioners(BOCCI on�Iarch 6. ;996. The following approvals have been req,uested as par�oi the Detailed Subdivisioa review: �. • Rezoning from_-LF-Ski.:1F-1,�R-I,and R-�0 to R-t5�IiOlPGD.R-15 PL�.�H.-�HOiPCA �� AR 1 �HO/PliD,R-30 PliD.and.�F-Ski. (First reading approved 6/30,?nd Rzadins and _ i � Public Hearing held 9/"?4 and conrinued to 10/39). : + • Special Review tor proposed mulri-family and retaii uses in the�.R-1 Zone Dismct. (Fusi , { Reading approved 9/10,?nd Readin�and Public Hearing held 9/34 and continued co 10/�91. ; y • Consideration of Land Use Code Amendmenu to provide for multi-year;rowth management � � allotments to"exempt�'mixed,free markedaffordable housing projects. (rlmeudmenu adopted `; � ; 6/30). k } ; � , = :; PROCES5: This is a two-step review requiring Planning and Zoning Commission f � recommendarion and public hearings before the BOCC. . ;, '; The P&Z recommeaded approval of the Detailed Subdivision,Rezonings,Land tise Code ' Amendments,and Special Review Uses,all subject to conditions,on Apri129,1997. � Subsequent to Detailed Subdivision approvai by the BOCC the applicant shall submit and the " � BOCC must approve a Subdivision Improvemenu Agreement and a Final Plat . f: APPLICANT: Hines. APPLICANI"S REPRESENT�TIVE: Glenn Hom,Gideon Kaufinan. ' t _` f 1 • �: . . ._ _ __. _.._.._. . ,.. _ _ ... _ .. _ . _. _. . _._ . .. �_ ,_ _ -., � . � �� r� � —• �- . 'I' . � . . -�-. . �___�� _ _-------— — .._� ._ --- _--.�.,—� c.�J •?: -�:� . � �:. . r�N��': �' � . �Mi . •1.�'"`��L�a ... . . �'�,��i.:: •;:�<.'-'sJ'•,:, �'t�:''.;�-�:�'- ;,, �`.Z'Y�� LOC�ITION: Aspen Highlands 5ki rLrea Base. - "'� � -..•, - BACKGROUND: The staff memos co che P&Z,as well as all attachments provided by staff or the ,� . applicant have been previously provided to the Board as background information. l='' �� REQUIItED BOARD ACTIONS: To complete the remaining required acuons on this applicauon �,�:,%:?. �� the Boazd must make determinauons in Four issue areas: i}Rezoning,3)Special Review Use :,::;�: : Approvai.31 Conditions oi_�pproval.-F)Allocarion oi residentia!�owth managemen�quota system develo ment aliotmenu. ,k � P ;� . .�<.; ` $�ONITfG: The first reading oi the proposed ordinance rezoning the omoersv•.vas approved by �' • the BOCC on June 30. 1997. The continued second reading and oublic hearing is scheduled for this ;�:"` � meeting(ordinance attached). ''•`� ;;,: :L: SPF('TAT.RF.VIEW: � � ' Special Review iJses-In Lhe:1R-i zone distric:,proposed retail,multi-iamiiy�i�veiling unit_and ':�rr ', some other uses are subject to Snecial Review anprocal oursuant to 5eccion�-=19.:0 of the Land %,.,� Use Code. Tbe intent of�he re�rie:v is primarily to dete:mine whecher the pronosed uses are ,��s' comparible tivith the charac:er oi 1ie surroundin�aei¢hborhood. ' - i .The special review uses requested'ny;.he applicanc are?)alpine ski areas and suuport services,') club houses and recreational buildings,3)dornvtory housing,�)multi-family dtiti�eiling uniu.�) �'+ Nordic ski azeas and support services,6)outdoor recrearional uses.7)personal service oudets,S) places for recailing oY goods.91 Qrofessional o£fices aceessory to on-site opera�ions. � � It is the staff and P&Z recommendation thaz the pronosed mised use concept ot:he Villa;e Core(to � he zoned?,R-1 AHO/PUDI is very mucn in harmony with the applicable mascet olans and land use policies. " The requested special review uses were approved on first reading September 10, 1997.as part of the � ' detailed subdivision approval resoIution.The continued second reading and public hearing is - - scheduled for this meeting. $'ONDiTiONS OF APPROV:�T: A resolurion wiih conditions of approval was adopted by the Boand on Srst reading September 10, 1997. A revised resoluYion based on Boazd commenu and staff referral comments is attached for review atthis meeting. . GROWTH MANAC*E11��IT Ai LOCATTONS• The proposed project requested allocation of 29 ` Commercial Employee Generation Uniu,11 tourist accommodations,and multi-year residential allo�ents for 112 Affordable Housing units and 43 Affordable Housing-Associated Free Market } units. The required scoring and recotnmendations have been completed by the P&Z and Growth ��. " Management Commission. The resolutions for Boazd acceptance of the recommendations and for + ; - the commercial allocations were approved by the Board on September 10,1997� The residential �; . �I J ,s • � . �%:: _ :__ . . � _ __ _ � / 1 '` ,i .. v -� ', . +' , .� - ��. . __ ___ _ _, 'n•. � ��_., _ _ .___.� _ — .� _ . �. e.i � ' ,�:; �� - - - _ .__. ,��;.,:. y � , I ,�`�", +� L o ,:, �:°yb ��:� ,.f� t ��.k i� . � and tourist accommodations allomzents will be�aIIted as part of the detailed submission resotution .�. ; under consideration at this meeting. �, � ,.a � ISSUES FOR OCTOBER 29,1997: This meeting has been designated for continued discussion �.�'•_,. I of the proposed resolution of approval for the detailed subdivision submission. This meeting is a • " continued second reading and public hearing on the detailed submission resolution and the rezoning � ordinance. � The applicant provided at the last meeting two key documents that constitute the detailed ,�:�� submission consolidated plan,representing ali the changes thai have transpired through detailed I submission review:"Aspen Highlands Village First Draft Detailed Submission Consolidated Plan .. i Maps,September 24,199T',and`:Aspen Highlands Village Detailed Suomission Consolidated � : � Plan,September,199T'(both previously distributed}. � � The September 24,1997,Hearings were continued to allow the applicant time to respond to � concezns e:�pressed by Dan Blankenship regazding the Castlel�iaroon RPTA route and Bud Eylaz's ' ' sug�estions for changes to rhe Construction Mana�ement Plan. These approved revisions are - � documemed in the applicanr s October 17,1997,letter!attached). � t� t ;: RECOMIVVI�VDATION: It is recommended thac the Boazd approve the�,spen Hiahlands Village Detailed Submission and Rezonin�by adopting the attached resolurion and ordinancs. � f �._ � :�T'T�CHh1ENT5: . . f - S I 1.Applicant's September 24, 1997,letter . � ; 2.ApplicanPs October 17,1997,letter � � • . � 3.Resoluuon � f _._! I 4.Ordinance i ' � r G:1029mam . � . . E , � I E I I � � � � �'�' I i i . I ' � �,, ' _ .-----'._._- _'-__ ..>..,-..... . .._...:. �....,.._ ...�......_ ........ . � ------".---- . .___.__._._ .._.... :, �.....�: � . .. '_,..�._.._.. ..yf 14 �.. . i . . . . . , y �' � . .� � � . . � . �i' . .� . .� , . . S' � . � . . .. ,. .� _ . . . -------, -- – 1 '-t•. . . . . -------'—_— . — _—.-- . ;%�! =k:: _. _ , _ _ ��,. Attachment 1 ��'�y�'''� �. 13 � :.gi`� ... Da.vis Horr��= p�� r>�� s:�rk� PIANNING & RE.4l �STATE COIVSULTING `- , -::t�t� Y� �� ' ..,y'`,.-� ��_.. � � Septemher 24, 1997 �;"� �,�, Lance Clarke �,ICP ..�:�`�:` ` Aspen Pitkin Community Development Department ��,:.::�,,��. 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 . k'�'! '. ;�.; . �Y,� _.: ��.;: . .t Re: Aspea Highlands Viilage Detailed Submission: Consolidated Plan �'�` . {'; , :,�_;; . ::E� , Dear Lance: �." � �:_:i�1:� As we discussed, the �saen 3ighlands 7i_lage TJetailed Submission: c� 1 Consolidated Plan (1'?9i} aagreqaces a11 submission matzrial in one p�; • � set of docsments to consLiLUtY �he �spen H�.ghlands �li�iage (AHV} • site specific develooment plan. The ?lan follows the same for:�tat i ` as the Aspea Hiqhlands 4illage: Detailed Submission (September ! 1996). This lettat summarizes dif�erences the 2996 Detailed ' ' Submission and the I.997 Consolidat=d P1an. �' 2. . Village Cora , 1. Villaqe Core Site Blan and Basement Plan P.3 - The basement plan has been modified �o reflect revisions to the P1an during the process. The new building �ootprints, basement area - alavaut, and service entrance nave ioeen altered based upon the ' � ; evolution of the Pl.an during the review process. During the j planning process, a Village Core Building Envelope which i surrounds the Village Core was developed to generally delineate the limits of building activity. The footprints of buildings may vary from the Consolidated Plan at building plan submission. � 2. East Toarahouse and AfEordabie Housinq Gradinq Plan & Aest �, ' Townhouse and Affordable Housing Grading Plan P.3 - The �, ' grading plans for these areas show the £inal grading plan (see L202 and L-203) . The plans establish the building envelopes for the townhouses and affordable housing units. The �i townhouses are now referred to as the East and West Townhouses rather than buildings 1 and 10. :ij ` , . 3. Architectural Drawinqs/2-a - The drawings show the building I' " , footprints, roof pZan and eZevations. � ALICE DAVIS,AICP f GLENN HORN,AtCP �� 215 SOUIH MONARCH ST. • SUITE 104 • ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 •970�925-6587•FAX:970/9Z5-5180 t 1� ... . ... . . _... .. . ... . . . . . . : :. .. �. t . _ _. ... . . . r;f /� �,'�+' �. . . � . � .. - . . '1 _"'_ ' ��. - t � • • r ' .� • � .T,.,..�...�--� - _.. ._.... __'. _ .__._.'__ . . .� .__ . � _ .._ �_.__1 . a,i --'. �_ �,��,�. ,. ___ _ .,_�� r„ .� . , , -- - -. , - _ . ____..� .� � '�,��;:' . ti._ tp,�-. , . �i•_��'. . � ;��}�-: Lance Clarke AICP • September 24, 1997 , ! Page 2 .� J ;,.1 I :�� i 4. Affordable Housinq P.4 - The affordahle housinq section has � been revised to reflect modiEzaations to the unit mix and � location during the land use process. The Plan now calls for ! 111 affordable hous'ing units, one less than the total ' allocations which P,HD will receive. Th.e applicant may or may not utilize the 112th ali.otment, depending on the final design process. ;1. 5. Commercial Space P.b - Table 3 defines .Iet Leasacle 3rea. 1 6. Service Area Plan P.6 - The service area has been relocated as � ' discussefl in previous meetings. . r � 7. Floor Area P. 7 - Table 4 shows that cotal floor area is :he same as Detailed Submission (1996) , 5owever, there has be_n a minor redistribution in the aPfordable housing `loor area between the Karoon and Thunderbowl neighborhoods �o r=_ilect � - �he revisions to unit counts. There may be a minor redistribution of floor area at building plan submission, but total •_°loor area �ill not exceed the total £loor area in Table I - 4. 1 e. Off-Street Par!cing Plan - The skier parking lot and the ; underground aarking in the Village has.been reconfigured in � t � 'the land use r=view procsss. The revised par?�ing plan is � i depicted by drawZngs A003, A004 and A005. � i i i � III. } + Maroon Neiqhborhoad i [ { 1. Drawinq L-2a4 - Exhibition Lane has been relocated a few feet J to the west to allow for the building envelopes on Lots 16-19 : to be setback Eurther from Maroon creek Road. ,. The sizes of the building envelopes have been reduced and building envelope setbacks have been varied. The concept of an activity envelope as opposed to a building ; . envelope has been documented. Buildinq envelopes specify the I bowndaries within which buildings, sheds pools, driveways, grading landscaping and retaining walls are permitted. Deve3opment within the Activity Envelope is limited to ;�, driveways, grading landscaping and retaining walls. ��: � one affordabZe dwelling unit has been relocated from the • Thunderbowl Neighborhood to the Maroon Neighborhood to respond . i � � ____ -----__. ._ : / , - -� _ _ „ _ . _ .�� .,. , � . .. � ' 4 MF � • �� \ �• ti . ". .. . . . .. . � . ,» . . - . . �..�-�� a,i ,�; , ^ .� �"�...��;,f �a��_; , r:�t,: .. :�t'k�,��. LanCe Clarke AICP �•� September 24, 1997 Page 3 ``: "'> i . i ' :�� to concerns raisad by neighbors to the north in the Wiltrout � Subdivision. The new unit wiZl be located an the north side �� of Exhibition Lane (see drawing L-203J �.7'�, I:;. � � .; . Tv. , �:.-.- i = - Thunderbowl Neiqhborhood �r 1. Affordable Housing Plaa P.11/Drawinq L-2a1 - During the review process (see Aspen Highlands Village � Detailed Submission: Supplemental Renort), the total number of i units in the Thunderbowl aeigtlborhqod .ras reduced �rom 17 to � 16 as the resu�t of a �ur•�ey error on Glen Dee Dr?ve. � Recently, in =�sponse =o neic}nbors in the :ailt:out i Subdivision, one af°ordable dwe�l=nq unit previously locat�d � on the north side of :Keadow Lane nas been re2ocaL�d to the Maroon Neighboraood. �dditionally, the �wo af�ordable j dwelling units pr000sed �o be locat4d adjacent to �he �iiltrout - Subdivision have been redesigned to be more compatible with ' the neighbors. Dr3wings A9-10 and A9-11 snow the �ew one- story floor plans and elevations. 2. Revisions �o Buildinq Snvelooes L-2oS - The building envelopes � 3 in the Thunderbowl neighborhood have been revised to increase ' � j setbacks. � ' 1 � I 3. Gradinq Plan Drawing L-2o5 - The qrading on the north sida of ! ! � the ski easement has been revised. The driveway serving � � Thunderbowl Lots 11 and 12 will not be grade separaLed from ti � the ski easement. The new grading nlan substantially improves � the grading plan for Lot il and the transition from the : 1 Thunderbowl Neighborhood to the adjoining properties. � � v. . . ;: w ', ' Planting P2an 1. Overall Plaatiag Plan L-400 to L-406 - The Planting Plan has � been revised based upon comments during the land use review process. 2. Maroon Creek Road Plantinq Y.12 - The Plan text documents the Board of County Commissioner's decision to phase the planting ' � on Maroon Creek Road and review the success of the Phase 1 - � Maroon Creek Road plantinq before planting Phase 2. �Y�- i � � � _. _..- _ _---- -.__... ' , __ . ./_, __ _ _ . _. _.... . �� , �„ / , .. �, . " � y� �'I \. ^ . . . - - .. .. �t� .. � .. _ -.. � . / . ._� . . . � . �-... ___ ..__.._.__._. _. ._—.._. ___. ...._._�.____..�_� . :a,� _�__.� ____.._ _.. � � �._:- ...._, :. . �._.. . --- .. F::: ��`' ��j�2` ,.�,�''� ':��"42;. _,,.: Lance Clarke AICP - ' September 24, 1997 't:5� .:",, Page 4 '�� -, .. . 3. Aeed Manaqement Plan L-4o6 - The Weed Managment Plan ��I��" previously su4mitted is included in the submission. �:;• . . :.tf:.t,.. . ;x_: �� y'�`:�.. yf , : ,G:.;; '- Affordable Housiaq 3uactions ;�.,, :::,. . 1. Residentiak Affordable Housing overlay Zone Requirements P. ''%s:�-.. 13-14 - The data show the requirement to be 234 people, the �� same as in the Detailed Submission Plan (1996] `' 2. Non-Resi.dential afPordable 3ousinq Overlay 2one Requirements �=C r P. 14-20 - The total require*nent is 126.4 �eoole •dhiCh =s the `F+' isame as projected in �he Detaiied Submission Plan (1996) . �'� � �'(- � 3. Affordable Housiaq Droposal P.19 - �The revised af�ordable ' housing proposal is summariaed. ?, *_otal of 267.25 peonle wi11 ,�� . be housad which is an increase of 18.75 people from the � Detailed Submission P�an ('?996) . ,� ;�. .. VI2. Planned IInit Development i ' Definitions _ , ' i � 1. Activity Envelope, Buildinq �nvelope, Net I,easable Area P. 21- �' 22 - Refer to these definitions which document our past j discussion regarding these definitions. ' I 2. Floor Area for R-15, R-30, Residential IIses s AH Zones P.22-23 - This definition follows the new Code definition however, "accepted grade" is substituted for "finished grade." This ! variation is consistent with our discussion with you and � � Joanna that indicated that the grading plans (drawings L-201, . ! L-203 L-204 and L-205) will be "accepted grade" in the ;' Thunderbowl, Maroon free market and affordable neighborhoods. 3. , Floor Area for Multi-family, Townhause, Non-zesideatial and � ' Mixed IIse Builflinqs in the AR-1 2one P.23-24 - This is the �i}_ � final version of the floor area definition for the preceding areas. ' � - . r+��. � �,:� ' __ __-__ ____ __. ,�_ _ ____. _.__ ..._ ._ ____ _.. _.. _. 'r i - ' . , � �.� .} -^ . '�, � , + : � . , ., . . �• _. _. _--_`_ _ .., _. ._ _---;----, . �:�'^— , MJ ,. � — . _......__.— - � �t�`,< ' ! J� L �+',-��Y��•',�. �� ";�n z,.�i;;, Lance Clarke AICP '� `-�'. September 24, 1997 ' i•�' Page 5 • �,� .. ' i � , - Area 6 Bu1k Requirements ��` . 1. Yard and Road Setbacks, Driveways, Minimum Lot Aidth & Size P. ��.;'�- 25-26 - Our past discussions are documented in this section. � �'"�-` i ".' ;a.i`:Iji j Aspea Highlaads village Residential Homesites Desiqa aad Landscape � Regulations Guidelines P.28-29 '�'� . �`a.•,.�,...^.i • ' Some of the unnecessary language has been deleted and restrictions I.;: ` regarding colors and materials requestad by the ?lanning and Zoning Commission have been added (top of p.29) �" +� .y� %. Park Land Dedication Drawing 2-2 showing the park land dedication parcel has been added. '� %..� XI' �1 2oning . `I � � Drawing Z-1 shows the proposed zoning map nas been added. ' � �, SI2. t ` Responses to General Submission Conditions I13 & 14. This response has been revised �o reference City of �spen iOrdinance 19 Series of 1997. ', 20. This response has been revised to reflect alterations in �,� . parking garage design discussed as noted in Appendix 11. � 21 & 25. This response has heen revised to reference the most , recent air quality work located in Appendix 4. - i 26. This response has been revised to reference the most � i recent transportation work found in Appendices 2 and 3. . I � � 29." This response has been revised to reflect the increase size of the remote lot (113 to 135 cars) . � � . 38. This response had been revised to reference new drawings_ 41. This response has been revised to re£erence the BOCC , meetings. �.;. The revised plan for the Maroon Creek Road needs to incorporated in + the final draft of the Consolidated Plan. ''". � ;� . :;1 1 ______._ __----.._. ......_ :... ,. _._ . _.. _. __. .._ .. . _ _____ --- . ___ , _ . . _ ._ _ _ l � ` , � ' v �; : .. -• ' - � .�. s � , . ----- -� '�n-. �---_ . - �-� ---- ---- . � _ _— _ --- : �,) _-_.: � �.,.G-' .. `-. . - .'_.. .- . .... . ...,...___._.� .r�,,,... .�,� __' -..___ , � ' It; �:rY`r , , . ;�. > z.::4 � F.!�'� :t. i,, �;�' I ' "',s ' Lance Clarke AICP � September 24, 1997 ?= -`�. Page 6 . I,.�,.;�� 1:. _ y.,. '.f ; . . The information in this letter should assist you in reviewing the i�`�:.r� -k: iAspen Highlands Village Detailed Submission: Consolidated Plan. sii.' :: ',� Please call me if I can be of assistance. '``'`- �" i ,Y:::.-; - Sincerely, ''``��. . � .: D HORaI INCORPORATEA �. � .. e,... � . � �?;:.: . �.: t`�'� GLENN HORN AICP �; I . !'�i�. . . I - i ' i ',;:: _ �� i .f "� -- r . � . M, ; ,:: ;. .� - �: - � .,, �I , i � � � ��-:; .... .. ..._._. .__�._ _.----...W,..'..._-•....--_-_"-_ . . �.�.. . . .. . ��kF - i i'. - . � �.. . - . . . . � , � � .t��_ . F ... � � . . ` . � .. . t� 'p ; ` . ..� . . .�� . .. � . j ��. . • - - . . . �/ � .. .� . . �, . . . . _ - . . . . - . . . .. . ._�.; ��'.. ' . .. •' , . , . . . . . . . . � � - � :'::':� .� . . . � . . . . . . ' . . I . . . . . , . ' ' - . � � . . ' r_. . �k:. � . . __._.__--- _ ---� . --�-'----� . . . ,� �.�.._ :��'. ,�,,.�, -- .. ;,<; '{ ATTACNM�NT 2 � � I��ti? � i�avis�or�,�,�- ��:s.: �.,�,,�.: AL4NNING & REAL ESTATB CQNSULTING - �'- .:'1 .. �a ,�,. ; �. .. October l;, 1997 ;,_�•- . { ;I . , Lance Clarke �ICP �spen Community �evelopment Depar��ent 130 South Gal'ena Stre_t � Aspen, Colorado 81611 � Re: asnen Sighlands 7:1_age: Deta��ed a^ubmission i � _ i Deer Lance: • � Th?s iet�er summarizes �ze siatss oi out��an�ing ?ssses: 1. Ear�h Tones - ?'he �saen Highiands �Iillage PL'D �uide wi�i ; include ��e _ol?cw_ng de=init�on of earch �ones. "� color, � I :.he same as or c'_asely ,=1aza4' to t.ye c�lcr �f ve�etat;on, _ t j �rse �ar'c, earyh rocks and �neadow �__nge in �r:ci:iL.� oi �he � J �spen Highlands Sk? rlrea base.�� , � 2. Benchmar'.t - The apnlicant snall eszaplisn a benchnark in the PIaroon C�esk Road righ"t-of-aay ad;acent t� Lhe dumpstar � j enclosur= at t?xe Chaminox c�ndominiums. Surveyors will t provide the ac�ual ale�ration and a surveyed desc:iption of the ' monument. . __ � .; ; �r � 3. Tree Removal - Tree removal will be limi�ad to *he designated � "Activity Envelope" and "Builcling Envelope" as defined on Page ;, 21 of the Aspen Hiqhlands Detailed Submission: Cansolidated ' � Plan. � 4. Transit -P1ans - Attachment 1 is a copy of the revisions to the � Castle Maroon RFTA route and the Dial-a-Ride plan. Dan Blankenship has approved the revisions. i ' ; �5. Construction Management Plan - Attachment 2 is the revised ' �1� Construction Management Plan which has been changed to reflect j ��µ -p Bud Eylar's recommendations. �{�:. , ��,��5,� � '-_ Revised Weed Mana ent Plan - Attachment 3 is a revised Weed � e ALIGE DAVIS,WCP S GLENN HORN,AfC7 ��; j �� 215 SOU7H MONARCH Si. • SUITE 104 • pS?EN,COIORP,DO ST6T1 -970I925-65d7• fAX:970/925-5180 f. I . _ . .._..--____.. .. . . .. ._... . .. J ._ . .. . . . .. .,_... .. ..... ' '� - � � , � . �� . . _� ' �: , , _ - . _ . , ..�. . . , . , �-�..---- - - .qS •�: � `.. . . _ . � .- "�'n. :.�.�.��u:s Mu�,Yr�.-::::.�° :.�;�}...�'•.;i - . . .i�*.;;:`�::iv� � � 3y�1 { _�,� ;'i;- ,��<: r:: � ;: ' ' Management Plan which has been revised to reflect Steve ; ;. Anthony's recommendations. ° �' i;_�, i Please contact me if you have any questions or need any additional ��'':�� information. � " •" �� ..-- Thank you. 4.' ,." � ,-: �:5`:..''',ir Sincerely, �-"""'Y� ' fi.;. :.:::�:r�:": DA� HORN INCORPORATED ., I�� GLEAN HORN AICP �� .:c,.. . � . H. , +cr t . �@. �; �: � � �i � . . � � .__-__`_� ' . ' ��e. ' ( / I ?: ,. � � � '= �. i�`, I , � :a'� `.i I.'�a�;, ' . .. '-_ w.. .�.��J.,�....» ..� _. ' �.�,,...,...............,�...�. - I ..��.._.�,.�.__,...'__.�.�,.�_..__�. �F�F'= 5, ' / . . . . . . . ' ' - f::_:. �a _ � . ' • �. � . � � I V I� `' . . '. � . . � �, . .. . _ � . . . . - . . . . . . � .:�-�.` . ' . . � .. ' � � � . - . / . �� _ .. - ..._ . � ._.._�...� ._...."__-'_�. � � . . �M.. � ♦ ��t._t_��.. '_'____"_.-_- . . ' � � ,�� _.:�• � � -�:�: . . __ ' ...�::.w. � 1�+ . .. .... . .................,_... . . (. ?Y . � ��}y5��A_'y��-�. . E'�y 1!.� �*?.. ��;,` .:�::;��,'•;: .lttachment 1 ";'�y`� . �..� $,r, .t;> Revised �spen Hiqhlands Villaqe - .�� , Castle Maroon and Dial-a-Ride Service Plan ',�'• ,' Castle/Maroon RFTA Route � . ;-,`' • The servica plan �or `.'�e Castle/Maroon RFTA Route service upgrades remains the same as ouclined in the Aspen Highland Villaqe Detailed ''-" Suhmissian: Consolidazed Plan with one exception. The proposed � ,�� upgrades to the Cas�le/Maroon RFT� route will be implemented upon «�#':y4`'- occupancy of the dweZ?ing units planned for ?hase Thr�e, rather than the reduction of skier oarking �0 490 vehicles. This is i��' �:... ;: . ancicipated to coinc'_de with occupanc� or" the Thunderbowl and . �7-,. Haroon Neighnorhood a�°ordanle dcrelling units and the dwelling ,; .: ' units in Buildir.gs .our and r^ive in aoproxi:nat2i� Z0o0. ��,, :. Approximately one year prior to the occupancy of Phase Th:ee the ;;:; de��eloper will contac� �FTA to order. a ne�r bus for the Cas�le/ ;�'� Maroon route. The �spen H:ghlands V:2?age Subdivision Smnrovement 'i'. ar,�_-aement °�aill as�ac?'_s. 'or.nal �roc�dur=_s and =_�a:tciai assurance *or �he upgrade to �ze Cas��e/.Iar�on rcut�. . �,;' ,:r. Jia�-�-3:de ?'_dA �/,t� '�. ' T.e �IOOr>'PUD and �s�en 3?qh'_ands Vi'_�zge �_11 join tcgecier co J onerat� a d?al-a-r>[e se_�rzcs �o r�duc� che nee3 =or res'_3enzs and � gues�s �o u�?'_ize au=�^tco?les. The ooers�`_on w_'_1 o,'.'er a •3ocr-co- dcor deliverv syste;i and tai'_1 ser�ica ��ins zo areas near �spe�. T_ansaor�aticn ser•:'_ce �i'_i ne �rovided �o t4e CiL'� of �spen core ar_a anci �o =ae a:_�cr�. T:�e `oi'_ow:ng sec�ions aropose a pr>_liminarv ooerat�or.s and service glan, and describes the veinic2�s to '�e used. Some o�erat'_ons de�aiis aill be finalized anen the i . - � seri�ce has been es�ab??sned. joperations Plan i . � i The system will be ope:ated in a flex�ble manner to maximize � convenience ior riders. Ser��ice leveZs :�ill be tailored to demand to provide convenient service. This section describes the initial service plan which may be modified in the future to meet actual demands of residents and guests as the proper�ies are built out. I Service will be initia�ed with two vans when the developments start to be occupied in approximately the year 2000. The fleet of ' vehicles and service may be expanded as the developments grow. � Service will be provided to the two areas illustrated by Figure 1. , ' uans will operated on a. Pixed schedule with pick-ups in the center of Aspen every one-hal= hour during the winter and summer high seasons. On the other end of the route at AHV and the Moore PUD + the vans will drop off and pick up passengers at their origin or ;c� destination. During the off-peak seasons services will be reduced + ; - to match demand. ( �` ! i� l;`:� . � , ., : _ . __ _. __..: t_... _ �-.: . , . _ . _._._.. , � '�:` 4 .t. , `� -�. . ' �' . � ti � ' ` ' � .j�.- . . j . � .. K. �� -�..��.__. ._.._.��_._. ._ ..__.... ._._ . .._._._.._�_'.� . . A�� _ - � -=� .__.. ------ �r . ~�� ,� �. �,`�.F��;, �,: During the peak season(s) , Route � 1 will serve the Aspen Core_ Dial-a-ride vans will provide service on a fixed one-half hour � schedule generally following the route depicted on Figure 2. Three � "�� check points will be established in Aspen, potentially at Mill - Street/Hyman Avenue, Cooper Avenue/Spring Street and at Rubey Park. .` ' The vans will pass these checkpoints on each circuit route so i� � � patrons are not reuuired to ca11 for service. Two vans will - provide one-half hour headways at the checkpoints. t',>``4 +: The second destination, Route � 2 is the Aspen-Pitkin County -; ' Airport. This will be on demand ser�ice, similar to services '=r� � provided by other resorts in �he �spen ar_a. At the time guests make reservations to stay at �HV, they will be advised that car .. rental is not necessary because of *_he alternative transit services : available. Departur_s to the airport will be scheduied ahead oi time. Service Plan i i �- � D?'=0L' t.0 1T31t1dL10I1 AL S0Z'V1C2� �� sna'_� pZ'_SZI1L d ''1'�2*3_�°_.�. i!' jservice plan �o the 3F'"A :or �a�r_ew. . '�he �lan sha_'_ inc�ude: I � j 1. Estiaate o� demand; 1 i _ . _ . � ; 2. Descrint_on �� spec:=?c �erv:.ces including �he *�umner of • i venic'_�s, spar�s, hcurs of otierations and headways; i � 3. An organizat_onal cnar� indicating manager and personnel to provide serv?ces; and �}. Szrvice mar:cecing plan. ' - � e1HV intends to of�er dzal-a-ride service saven days a �re�?c 3uring � the winter and summer peak seasans. The Aspen core rcuLa aill be j offered from 7 AM to midnight. R�der surveys wiil be uLilized to � determine niqht serv?ce should run later in the evening. ' � Service to the airport will be provided when the airport is � operating. The ser-�ice will be available to all guests and _ . � residents in AHV and the Afoore PUD. � At the end of each of the first three years of ooeration AHV shall submit an annual report to RFTA at the end of the winter season. ` The report shall include: � � 1. Statistics regarding ridership for the previous year; ;, ' 2. Instances involving standees and missed trips, or trips � requested but not provided; and i 3, Statistics regarding accidents and roadside calls. �. _ Based upon the review of the annual zeport, changes in the levels ' , j � service may be made. ' ' i ; ti - , ___.___ ._ � _ _. _. _ _ _ ._ . _ 4 , / . . ' � ��' .t: � t , .�a . . � tI. `� � . . ' l, .. �. . � . '. . . . . _— ___. . _.'—"__.'_.� . '�-. �__ - __ ._.__..—_.. — _ .- � ;arl i` c�.�,r: � '7"c�.��"f�k<I�d�,.., a.-?a,Y.�. .� ,�r -�: . _ - - ......__.__..� , ... �;'-:. . . Grs� t.�. Y }�c •..r � . r �', �� Ve213.C1H3 . y t� �Xi' The service wi11 operate vans capable of carrying as many as 12 ' •st�'s- -� passengers at one time uith space for luggage and skis. Passengers •.'�a will be able to stand in the vehicles. '.,R>r�•'._ .;' Eventually, three or four vans may be utilized when both �� = • developments are fully occupied. Initially, the fleet will consist �`�`-. of t�o vans and aill be expanded as demand aarrants. The vans will be stored in the AHV parking area and will be maintained by local �.'-;�;,�',: mechanics in the Roaring Fork Valley. If necessary, another van(s) � •.uill be rented if a �an is out o= ser��ica �or ;epairs, and high `;7~«�: traffic is ancicipaL�d. k,: �t least one of the vans zn the fleet w_11 be equipped ui*_h a aheeZ � . ; chair lift for the handicapoed. � I Cost �y+ , The cost for prov?ding this azr-�ic� zas peen pro;ec�ad 'aased cn venicle utilization anc3 indus�ry hour'_�� cos�s *o onerata '�enicles. Dur�ng the ainter �ea;t season, �_ =5 gra;ec�s� .-:a� �as52ng2T �:� productivity «ili �rar.% �e::reen e=ghc and i2 �assencers �er venic'_� . �er hour. �lan costs arfl sssumed to ba $ 30. �er van _^_cur �ased nn � the seraic� being _un. �'he cosz zo �r�v:de ser�r:ca is �s�-�a�_�' �o i 'ne $ 29S,000 per yea:. :�•.: _ ji . ;� �I i `J 4 ____? � � � � ` ,' � � f � F � � f , � - . 1 �, . " �� i � � ' j*x- � - {1 � - 4 ( • _�.. _ _.�._�__ . --�----��..___.._.._.___ , �: : ,_:. .....:__. --�:A-..L.s.�..�_ .__.::: ..<..._r k:�fi�.. � _.___ � , . 5, --a . � ... 9 � ��F . ' . .1 _ . . . . . . � t� � �`` , �' . � I ' . . ,. . , . . . .. _ � , . .. . r�� . - . � ' • .. _` �-_-��- _-__�_.-.�_._ . .. .__..-__._._ �_. ___'"—__'"'--'-� . . . �� . __ ` � �„ _----- _.�,: . __ _ �. `,�� i��;;. JF b' � y�S�' <. ' • ��a,-r,t��.p•{�. Attachment 2 �•• -'�'��` ,.. �spen gighlands viilage Draft Construction Management Plan `,'4.� Overview • �r� �:�� In preparing the procedures and measur=s to Ae incorporated in the ' ` construction nrocess for the Aspen xighlands Base Village, it is �: ', ' important to urtderstand both tha goals of such �rograms and the � - practical realities or �he construction process. our intent is to minimize impac�s associated with the construc�ion of �he Asnen �:�+''^�� Highlands Base Jillage improvements �rhiie allowing =aork �o �roceed in such a �anner as :0 3void nrolong_ng The construct?on oeriod. ... Travel Demand �ieasures (TDM) ars �ost �ften �houant oi :�hen discussing the progr=_ss o� an axistiag develonment or :�ow �o deal ' with potential impacts �rcm a �utur� development. The concapt of f,. utilizing TDM as a par� of the constrnc�ion and develooment process is a unique ?@ea. �`y�i�ai'__�, �DM :,ri.? �r?7ci�a1'_y 3ea_ a?�h mas� *_�ansit incent;ves and auL� d'_siac�n�zves� iiowever, o�Zer _deas 4 have been in�r�s�_qa�°d :??at;�re =� "�M and =:�e �cns�=uct;crt I. arocess. Out��ec �e=�� ar� seve=3'_ �easur=_s _`:e 5zo�ac� ��boses f to ?mpl_ment as a aar� oi �_-ie cens�=lc��en pr�cess, ; - Tra�rel Demand and ^_'ra�°ic Control �Se�suz_s + Dur_ng the cons�rnct_on o� t�e aspen 3ig'rtiands 3ase 7=??age 'tae i _�llowing TDM ar.d T_�a"ic Control proaram aill be�in =_ °�c�: i �elivery of �ons�_nc�_on rsw natar'_a1s wi11 be aroh?bi4ad � during t:�e neak =ra=_�c periods. ?'his azl_ 1_�i� suca - f� deliverr accass �o _�spen iiicn'_ands 3ase j7illage ��om 3:o0am �o •± 3:30am and f=em 2-�Onm to 3:30nm. The exceaticn �o t`�is �i_1 � be scnedul_d c�nc�=_ta pours t'�at are �ime-sensit�.ve due �o �ae ;; quantity o� c�ncre=e being nlacad or oourad at one �ime. � i`; j Sneed limi�s for �andem axle and larger vehicles will be � � posLed at 20 mph at all times. � }# f �. Sub-COntractors will be issued a limited number of parking � �:; peYmits for their workers. �-, General contracLOrs will be requized to provide a parking plan t with their individual construction contracts. r . Contractors will be required to pravide van-pooling or car r ipooling programs as a part of their construction contract. ' Reduction in payment provisions shail be incorporated into the ` � contracts as a means oE ensuring compliance. i � To the greatest extent possible raw materials will be � � stockpiled on site to try to .consolidate deliveries of t ,f�� ,j � , � �i : _ _ ._. . ._._. _._ . `. f _ .. _. . _. : . - _ . n� � _ . c . Y `: .s ' t ' ti ` i, . ` ' . �- .1.•� . � • __ • / R • ' �--�--T'-�� . ._. _._..__ ��.. _ . . ` _..-�.. ., ___' .."._'_"___'�_1 A�Y •y_• ._�- � , �;. __. . -- �'�J�. .,u`i1;�fs �.��l.r�,:� ... - ., .. .. .a. �� . . .. _ r ...til,t , .nir. .. .,.��...r.��voa-. _ i k . h �� i . � N��'+• °1t k�;�,i:.,�,�i `. . *r�� .�,j`4.`�'�' � . . �^.', ,f.��. l.. materials in larger quantities (for example gravel) . Hines shall evaluate che feasibility of utilizing a on-sue batch '''' `� plant aral a large contrnctor storage vard tn reduce vehicular �'� rrips. I71e starage yard may be utilized far bulk storage of �y'�'',;, materia! a�ul equipment aral rhe secure srorage of tvols. ' A site Traffic/Delivery Coordinator shall be designated and responsible for monitoring delivery and contractor compliance - aith the TDM nrogram. The Tra,�ic/Delivery Coordinaror shrtll �✓`:�� establish a proyram to moniror all tra�J"ic and establish ,,;,.�", procedures to errsure compliance with the TDM program. The ,' : program shall :nclu{Le enforcement measures. The moniroring, r � compliance aiul enlorcement program shall be inclurled rn the �::.`'- • final Constructivn :47anagement Plan. ;:_; � The covenants and design guidelines for the _ndividual ; � neighborhoods ai11 nave nrovisions regarding cont:actor ��'•' parking on the str4�ts. � � i There �aii1 be zo ?ar{=ng allowed on *Saroon C�sek �oad or ?n �he acijoining neignborhoods. '";c ?_`_or '�o =ach c�nst_zction season �here �d:'_1 �e a meet_nq *ai�h �f`C' �F^_'�,, the ?'_�k'_n County Sneri=_' s Oi=ice, �Ze School � - Sunerinte'ndenc, the P%t,'cin CdunN c.n,u:eer and �he Deveioper to r=vie.� �he cor.strnction saason �dork nrogram and addrass any concerzs raise3 3ur�ng the nravious cons�ruction seascn. in addition =o �he above measur_s, Aspen Aighlands Base - TJiilage will p_zn and imp?=ment the following �roqrams �ugiW_ve Dus� Controi °lan, Publ`_c ?Iot_f�cation ?'_an and - Noise Conzrol �or Const:uc�ion Equiament. •�ach of t:�ese programs are addressed.below. i Fugitive Dust Cantrol �P2an i � � Dust control �till be imolement�d �rom start Lo f�nisn of each � consLruction season until the p.roject is complete. Contractors will be required to assume all respoi:sibility for dust control and shail ! car:y out proper and ef�icient measures wherever and whenever dust � control is necessary, thereby minimizing dust damage and nuisance to persons and property. Contractors will also be required to + control dust at the work site by the use of an adequate number o£ ; wat2r trucks or an effective palliative using. such dust-laying I equipment and methods as may be required.To the greatest extent • possible raw material deliveries to and from the site will be water sprayed or covered with tarpaulins as necessary to additionally minimize dust and dir� from construction operations. Public NotiEication Plan � If it becomes necessary to reroute trafPic on existinq roadways due 1` ��`-- . to construction related activity, the responsible contractor will �•. I. ,. � ' __._. ...__.. . __ - ' _ _ } � `, y � �; �, .^ . I.. . � . . �, �__ _ __ __. ^_ _ ..— - -- --_ ---- u.� - �- -.._ . - " ? -- -- � 1 �. `'''�� i F'`'��' `r Y.�.:{,' be re uired to notif the eneral "-��'�� q y g public of the detour(s) at least �•• twenty-fou= (24) hours in adVance of the scheduled occurrence. � All contractors will be required to notify public and/or private • utility companies at least forty-eight (48) hou=s prior to � ,�"> - commencement of any work in the vicinity of the utilities, No work '.��:• will commence until t'�e utility company has located the utilities ��'• or writteh consent to proceed has been issued. If utility service ' �- must be interrupted, contractors will be required to notify the �''�' appronriate County authorities and the affected utility users at �� ! least twenty-four (24) hours prior to interruption, "�:,` Notice will consist oi the contraczor' s ostin � "` p g of prominent and easily read signs, distribution of handbill notices, oubiication in ��?'`�� a local newspaper or a public announcement on local radio, or any combination of these as may be appropriate. Naise Control for Construation Equipment The contractor will be required to comply wit:� all appl�cable noise � control regulations, including the Pitkzn County Nois2 abatament � Or3inanca. ?11.'. const�nc�ion equipment operat_ons sha=1 �e scZeduled �o ooerate only dur_aq day�igni nours, i.e., :':00 a.:n. �o ?:00 � ' �.�., Monda�� throug'r_ Satzr3a1_ . � �� j - j� ;� . � . : • � E _ t ; ____ j r r �; w ' . � � :. � � h5 . . � `ti ��:; , � • ' �.:. '` __. ' �� ' 9 i''. � � � : � � I . . � _... "'_'_-•.�.._..._.....--......._.:�...�_-..:..:....��_._. I ...._ ._.._.,._....� :� ,...._...---_. _'_-. _.�:.�.'.... . . ._ - �.�..... , �?',�g H . . . . ' ' ...... u......�... rr11�'-',� � /� . � � � "\:• 5.�. 4 1.. � . i : --. � , , . . . t_ .� . - - � . . . � . t; ' '-- ��, . . . . . _ �....�5.- ` . � . . . . . . .:.yR.. , . ` I . . ' ,. .._M . ' � ��_�r ___.....__.__- _.....__...- ._ ''"_.___'_`� - ' . i Y� � ��- '�- --. _ . '} �`�; l� , �-4' . . � k�=�'k�fL;�. I '�� ; ' ;; N � ^a.........� ._,.�.' A .�'� i � .3) ��I �f 9;„;;;�.; _ ::;i=�s, i {,iitt �rri��q i�ii��tifiiilf�l ! ��l�j��il�Slf�(�� °j � I�I �s��{� 1$j�ir��; !(i(� ..,,,�� b�;a i �� ►,'�ai� ,��►t;;�,i j � � i Ih I� � � �; x, �►,� , �a{� ►��p . � . :� i� �I I j� �� I i��11��_�� ', ;l��ffl� ��I�#1��N�t �; :�;�I°�� 1(��s �I{ �i� � , : ' ` � i �I ��i rr.�a ' rt !iu ;st r � I i •- �ii��tijN3��N��lii1ljj�j�Iljili��'� : ��J�`;t��'�e1�1ilf�t��i 1 � ��'f'�,t� 's��r�� ,�� r,fl�� ; � �. �':, _ , 1l��i��l�� I ��,i �� 1�� t ��il�� ( �(i � � .ri , I ' ; � I � ':ttut{ ::FS t::r:t ! � I s!...�.. , . .. i . 4�i4idf ��ifit(i !(ti iiitit � I : , - � —�-----.. ..--------�--:_-----�-------- -----_ _. ... _ ..... � V � i ,. , �j # i F .,5 ..,..:_ ;�;� ; � „ �a � � ,'4 ,;z;:<�';��o � . ! ' �; ��;i{�ti��I��I�jsi;�;;�;u��►li(1�ii;(;�(tt�tt�f#�Ifii j !s� �$ � �;19(; ii� �� ; o �>;�c�: ! �I I��l��'��i�,�si�s�'I�;�f�j�I��+±�ii'!{{}��jl��l��E�i � �� ; ��'�I�� fl �3�,�� ; t � �a 1 � 4 � � �: . � � �� i ��fi �i��i��«� �« �f 11...ti ii `i��'�� ,' � i ti�ii� = iii ii 3 , I ' � f��{t� 1if�t��i';,j IR=�f�a�lE��f��.� �;I a j�, r� � � �� i t�i ' � ,�� •{�1� t,° ! � � � � 1� �E ��ii� • � � ; , ` . f � q 'l[tft! :: ;::.:: i � � i 2:.--- - -- � : ' i i Itt�il ii itiiii s ' i � a t � - --------- � - ` ! - ` i .� ; ; i _I ; � ------ --- -- — i � �� i � � 1 i ' � .�..,, s I ' � � �%�• � � ��' i�11 � �� +,l ;;z::z��3�� j ! � ; _ �; ,... :Aiti::.`�� J j;;�;" i ;!�_ { SI . �" �` ! {�;�il� tl� 'el�� f �.o ! � � I ,��:�, � i �. . ,,,� � � � �� a�il1 :� � � ; } i � ;,, f,';.y�,.(�1'��tyg��, � �, 1 i�`,�,�iy�, a �� i ' t� ,o k '�`� � ' ) { ` , _ : .I `.: � "- � , �-� {; �� J�'�.�r�x 's � 3 rii;p'= t ;� � i � � w..: `t��j,� � ; I `,,�1,.`l�)!'� ° s ��f��'� t� �ii�s� t �� _I � �, . .\ �` ,r.I .�. ' ��.1(� <<,�� 5 � � �� ' 71 k� r I"�� ' ; p� � . � 1 � g 1 tuttt ee �:::a ;� • :'a, _; �, � , �>.,,:. �- .. .-- < �� i +; i,� �� S �� l:iii( ii 1[ilii i � " �''s1 �'� _� I . _ z . � �� ,r-=�•��_'._ - �� , . •�i�� l��s: � �� i;�� g. � �� it!:� I{'- ;� �" �� 'a � �g �� , � 4 � , � : � : :3 � � _ 0 � s-, . ��_;,,i ; , . � � � ._ ... �... ...�n......r i .�. . � . .__.......__- .. _.... ._ ..... , — .--___.�:.,:.._ �.. . _ _ - . . . .�.. . � f` . � � - \4:�:,� .. . / . ' ` 1 fi .. t � . ' ' . � � .. . • ' � . . . _._._— ._. _ _ , � . �r.. -.. ..__._—_' ' . e.'r :�_• � � . �- -- -- -�.- .. , ATTACNMENT 3 �,:��'�+` �� ,"� .,�r� _ t,.f;�<'+,;+:�.: �..L?,l.k... ' �RESOLIJTION OF'THE BOARD OF COUNTY CONIl14I5SIONERS OF PTTKIN '" COi tNTY,COLORADO,GRAI`ITING DETr1II.ED SUBMLSSION,PI,�1Wi ED UNTT DEVELOP!VIF��IT,1041 E�iVIRONNQ�,t�1Tr1,I,AA7ARD j�i�7�i�7,�,�SPECIAL ,.�.a REVIEW�PPROV�L,.TO TSE:�,SPEN HIGHL<�NDS BASE VII.,L�1GE PUD ,.�. Resolurion�Io-97 Recitals ' ' . ['Y` 1. ?.pplican�. °roject Locacion. and �pQrovai Renuestv - HI.iP �tounrain Limiied �,; :: . Parmetsiup. �snen Hie�nlaads tifounrain Limited Liabuiry Comnany, �snea �i�lands Skrin� i ; ' Comorstion. W'hippie Vaa �3ess �ones and :�ines ciionlan� „�ted ?armershio, �kereinafter refeired=o as "Apnlicant") nave anpiied?o ?itkin County for anproval ot:he ,aspea 3i�lands ' Village ("�HV")projecz. 'Ilie apniication specincally �quests auprova! =or Rezonins. Soec;a! , Re•riew. Growch vlana�ement Quora Syscem �lloanenu ("GVIQS"� and Detaiied S�missiocvP.anued T'nit'.�e:�e?oomeat t"PC�").=ne.�L;nea:3'i�lands�/iilase site ?s 'ocaced'n - �he�tazoon C:ea's�/aile�az:he�ase��i fne�snea iii�iands Ski asea�nd contains a�oroximaczi�- ;0 se:es. �he �arc�i :s :nore snec•;.ncaily desc:ioed :n :.�ioit :i. =ne �uodi�;isioivor� � Geae:ai/Cunce�tual�unmission:�as annroved wi�tt::ondirions. �s�videnced.:n 3oazd �i Counn• - Commissione:s i"Board"}�asoiuion a6-:�l i��CY111DSL B";. ?. . �sistin�L'ses-?he�ioiec:site s;mproveti with dle�Iaroon i.:ee's_�dge_;i�re�;k:[.uu. � and che�snea'rughiands�la�.rra oase irea;aciliries�nd a pari::n;:oc conrainiae Zporo�cima[eic• ' � �. � i1? u��treet �ar.�cing snaces. ��asung buiidinss contain approximateiy =9.:94 ;auare :ee� oi ; . _ comme:c:ai�nac�: ?.9 i 0 sauare'zr:oi skier services.and :,.ourisi�commodarion�nirs :n ne . S � Viaroon C..ee.�C Lodge. In che late I980's°itkin Counry:ssued a de:nolirion permit�o demolish;.he T�s�lancis inn.�uieh i ; ' conrained forcy-nine i191 �ouris�accommodanon unirs,-�00 square feet of rerail snace�nd=.:00 � square •'eet oi bar and:esraursnt�ace. The Hi�lanos Inn was de�olisned suosequent ro *he t ; issuauce oY the demolition permi�. ! s � , 3. The Plan-The land use ac�ons identified in the ritle of ihiss resolurion are rhe second�-ce� � ti in the aoproval process necessarv oo enabie the?.pplican�s to demolish all of rhe�eistinQ ovitdin� � ; at the base of the�spen Hi�lands Ski�sea and consaucc 3FiV,a new mised-use villa�e on the � ' site. The plan�+�**+*++a*+7ed in the�,spen Highlands V'�Ilage Detailed Submission: CoasolicIated , . Documents,September 1997 consutu[es the Site Specific Development Plaa as defined in Sectioa 6-�.7,of the Pittcin Couaty Laad iise Code. The r1F�V Plan includes rhe following elemenu: • 1liirry-0ne(31)sin�e family derached fiee-market dweIling units; . • Thiiry-nvo(;2)townhouse free-mat$et residentiai dwelliag units; • Sevenry-three(73)tourist accommodarion units; - Thirty-nine(39)Category 1 dorm imits(housing 50 people); � • Twenty-three single family Category 4 a$'otdable housing sale units(=1 bedroom); _ ___ . I.. .. _. . . _ _ x�,�,.• , .. _... ... . . . . �.,,,4 • . Y .� ' � t� ._.. � ' I.' ,- ; . • �.. . �� ... .. . _....._�... "__ ' ' " ..__ .__.."__�_�__� . U�� .... � rf <�,-�;�'�. 1,s��4x�t";, Resolution No.97- . �,'��ft�� ',,,��,.��;� Paga 2 , _ T� .t • Tweurv-eigut.i23)cownho�e Category;ai�ordable housing saie units i.i bedroom�; ti� • Eight!8)Category t and ei;itt(3)Category 2 mutti-iamily sale unirs(1'nedrooml; •�`��- • 9ae-IIl�t�?-1�?i Care;ory rtuee one bedroom sale units: ' �" • 7wo(3)Category=:wo bedroom reatal uniu: ,<. . • One(1}Category�two bedroomreat�l units: ;s.' .; � T'ea(101 Careaicer�weiline Gniu: �9:�_`:%:�" • Twemy-ane(IIOt1S8IIC1.3LY�1UIIOICQ(�l.p'OO)savare iest oi;etaii snac�s Vet�_asable '� " .�rea"_vZ�"1; r. � � Tweive thousand(I;.000)square feet ui�c��ssan•sicie:=e:�ices tN'L�1;: 't��.-,, , . F01IItC°:1*hoL�nd_.�ne�nnd�d!�ve�-,-�ve��'�",��',�l �'r'C°L�i'°e['��"'�nr-�ac��1iT a•. 1, � • Threr zhousand f=.UOD}sowzce teec of condominium mesun,:ooms t vZ 1�; ` : • One�ioivand ai�t�undred(1.3C0)sqvure�ae:of inee:u�:ooms(v'L�1: �" • Two�ltousand zyo aundrea i_:001 saunre:�:oi siti:u�ea stor�e;�'+L.i:_ f' • rour aundred nicy�—'.�Ol oac;ine snacas'or�e 1snea'�i�zuianrs Ski a.z�°.;•znd . . 'wo 3undrea md :hirt*: 1:':O� �eS:Clri4 3D3C�s •�s-s�e�c �ar,:;nQ �oac�s zbr 1ze aIIOrdaoie_iousin��d:ou.�ist ac:�mmodarion�iniu and.ai-�'�i=mpiuvzVs. t • The protwsed puysicai:ayouL�i�t:e?roie�::s,ie�ic.ed on�e�ttached"�xitioiu C:ureuvn=." � i � Ihe Counrr ce:nned �soea :s?�iarids 'v"ijlaEe: Decaiied �ubmission subsrantiail� -_omnie_e `n Januar� oT i99?. in �cidirion. :n ae:ordanca wirh �ocnmon pr�c:ics. :eaers :iud Sunn'tec:e:tai informarion have oeya submine3:o he�ord bv;he aopiicanL Connty;carF and che�uoEic. ` ' �.: ; The�spen '$t�lands Deaailed 5ubmission Consoiidated Plan�vas�ui�mitced�o�he,-�ord�o�II � reierenc� mazerials comotising �he Site Snec;nc De��eionment P�an �xould �e ivaii�ie :n �ne • I � document � � �. Apglicabie Land Use Code-The�pQiicant submitted the:lHV:Gene:a(Sui�mission:and i ; use applicarion in June of 1993 and did aoc rec�ive Genecal Submission approvai:mtii ti[arch i�. s 1996. In 3pril oi 1944,the Board of Couu�y Commissioners adopced a netiv Iand:ue�rode. By � ' separate resolurion(Board Resolurion T 9�1-68),the Boazd established a policy for rhe re��iew of land use applicarions which were in process at the time of adopuon of the"new"Code." RrsoIurion , ' #94-68 specifically states that"all acuve land use apgIications t6at have been sabmitted by Vlarch • 16, 1994 shall be reviewed pursuant.co che�.�cisring Land Use Code. The term active has been established by the Board as meaning an apptication which is substantially comgle:e and ready to be scheduled for review. Since the?.HV application was not only complete,but Eaad ar.ually been before the Planning and Zoning Cbmmission and the Boani of Counry Commissioners prior to March 16th,the Board found that the Hi�hiands Village appiication met the criceria for an"acuve" application at tfie time of the adoption of the"new"Land Use Co@e, In accordance with Board Resolutions 95-10 and 9b-6,the Boazd and . - ��:,. � . _.__ :._ __._ � __ _ __._......._ _. , _ . i rt�. / . ` � � 4 - r, ,` �` � � i , , . r"""'�"_" _ _ A.. _--- _ - ._ --- _._ . �. � .�. , �., � � ;�;�;;`,.�,, w�;� ;. ;� �b � i r'>f:?�9'' i ' ,. f�;�.:,?�fk'... y':•:'a' Resolution No.97- =:t�T•� Page� - , �'�.,. � -.y`., " Applicaac mutua[ly a�eed that ail Growch Vlaziagemeat Quora System(GV[QS) aiiouaenu and � ��. esemnuons woutd be �tocessed ?ursuanc to Secrions �-I40, 3-I�D, 3-160 oi the "aew" Piticin j:�`: County Land Use Code. , .:�.:.`<: �. Planning and Zoning Commissian Det�iled Submission Review Process - The :;,,;:;z,,.''. Anplicant�bmitied *_he_�iV: ,etaiied Submission in�Iovember of 1996 and the Counrv stat�' ieauesced addirional vateriais �rior co ce ,'�"�^ ` rdfyine the anplicarion is wmnlese. Tne znpiicaat ;;� •;; . grovided the addiuonal m,ueriais in:anuarv of 1997 and the anpiication was scneduied:or:evie�v '?:' , by the?itkin Counry Planning�d Zonin�Commission. _;. ' �.;,. . ,:�;;. . Ihe Planning and Zoning C�mmission (°Commission'i considered :he anniicauon u public ;;-�`� meecinQs on�Iarca 13. 1997.�nrii L 1997,�uril 7, 19.97.�prii [1. I997 snd�or1 '4. ;99?. �� :�t'te: consideration •�i �he apniicarion. Counry � snd �ubiic commen� _ne :�ommission �' recommended wprovai ot he anoiicauan�vith condirions. ::'?' . �r.i .?.r 5. Growth Ylanagemeut Quon 5ystem Beview Pmcess - The snoiicatinn ueci�caih� „� requests 3sven�feuo.�rea:11o�:eau'or_omme�:ai�,-noiovzs i::eae:ation i::uu,�G i.:'��.=ouris - i � accommooauon•.mits. :�ordaoie:zo�sins uuts ::nd iea mar?cet•inis :n he �1�ordaoie '_-iousin� ; Ove;lay tAFiO)zone. `f On �tarch '_3. ?997 che Growth ylanaee�eat Commission 1.'vVIC"1 �onszde:ed he anpiicanr� re?uest for'•_1 _�snen Vleao�'ea:°Q6 tourist accommodarion ailomienu ai a 3uic aoriced�uoiic _ hearins:md:ecomme:ded thac tne�en City Councii("Cuunr;i"` and;he 3oard=_*ani ailotmears ; to �HV. Ihe Councl wproved rhe ailommears �ursuant:o :��ea City C�uncii �zsoiurion 11 Series oi t99i and:he Board _nanted-he allommeau puauant�o :: •� _ _ _ - g�z�}��^ ,chis;esoiurion. I7ie remainins 52*.ourist accommodarion.allounenrs zecessan to buiid�HV�e demolirion snd:ecoas�c�on c:�dics for�e demolition or;he cii�hlands inn and � rhe_l4aroon Cre`!c Lodge. On 3,��+,M'_6,1997 the Commission held a duly nodcad pubIic hearin�to conside:the�pplicant's request for 29�mployee Geae.*auon L�aits(EGL s)avaitable in the 1996 Piticia County commercial ' Growth Vlana�eme� Quota Svscem("GVIQS"� Comperirion. :�fter scocins the application�e Commission recnmmended thaz the Boazd�dIIC rhe?9 EGU's to�i�i. The Board�'.IIICed rhe � allotmems putsuwt to Resolurion�Io.97-, , ' On A,�,�*?6, 1997 the GMC held a duly nodced public hesrin� to consider the Applican�s requesc to be designazed as an exceprional nroject piusuant ta Section 3-160.30 of the Pirkin Counry �} Land Use Code. The GMC found�HV to meet the standards for desi�aation as aa exceptional 'L� + Y� � _ ;� `�, '; ' ..:� .. r _ _ _ _ •:cr :. __. __ ._ . , _ - � .� � � : � � �;� . . . -K• . . .__. .—_.___._� � � __ �_.'_ — _.—.___ "'_ ._ . - _ � 1 a«a � ^ ;w;,. ,., _ � r? ; } ' . . ��,,�'�`: i �Y !`', . ' � [4:�yh i . �:�..;2�v}r��:. Resolurion No.97- '�- Page 4 � .'. ~> ptoject and recommended rhac;he 3oard and City Councl award fortv-three(�3)f�markec uniu (AH assoaiared)aad one nundred�veive�1121 deed resai�,cd ai�'ordable bousiag units(a$'orcia6le � housing) multi-year allouneats =o :�HV. The Board �anred the allomzenrs piusuani co this resoluuon and the C�uncil anorove:i the ailotmenu puts�ani to C:rv Councii Rzsolurion_series of i 997. .;,.. -. '. Board of Cuuncy Comm�as�oner Review Process - ihe Board �onsidered 1ie aEi�i Deiailed Submission anpucation ac public;neetia?s on June o_ i997.1une�0, t99i. :uiy'6. '_99Z ' and Sepiember 10. 1997. The 3oard::onsidered tb.e�HV�e•.ailed Submission:u s 3ui�aouced public:�earin;on Sepr.emoe:'?. '94 i. , . The Board considered the:lspeu Highlaads Viilage Deqiied Submission Consolidared Plan at rhe SeDteinbe:'_1. 1997 ?ubiic::e^-.n�. T:ie 3oard��nds-5az:he Decaiieci Suomis;;on :YanQed ' durin�he roview pmcess in:es�onse :o cocnmeau bv:he?ui�iic. C�mmission:nc 3oaza ?'ne Board snecincail��nds lhai�:.an?:s :o :ne :�h'�i �e�iied�ubmiss;on ue:yoicai �i=:�Qes :o si�incant;and:�se snniicauons ia?ittin;:ountti�nd;uca::hanses do aoc::onsrir,:te�:�e�.v!ana , use iuplicauon. T'ne Board :r_r's :�at he �.snen Hi�hlands Village Decaiied JUU�ISSIOR Cuusolid�ted Piare.Sencemoe:'9"'�constituies the Site Soe�:ne�eve:ovmeat O1.�n as deaned in�ecuon o-=."oi:`ae C�cie. � � ` 3. �snen �rea Generai Pian - �e 3oard �ncis 1�at :�e .3HV be.aii� �ucmission :is �. �odified during he:e�iew�roc�ss:s:.ansisteac�vith;he asnea 3rea Cnae:al?!an ss amended'oy � . S ; anp[icable comnrenensive�tans:.�d-±ie�oiicies and;`2uiacions ui he Pitt.-in Counrv Lznd[ise Cnde. • . " ; 9. Pitkin County Land L'se Cude Compliance-The Board finds the apaiication :o be in � comniiance �vith �he P�anned tinit Deveiopment (PL�) �randards (Sec�on ?-�l and �e:mirs a = variarions +som Land C;se Code ;equirements as rern�semed in the asgen Tii�hi�ands PL�U and � ieauested by the applicant in accorriance with the�spen$ighlands Village.Detailed Su6mission � i Cunsolidaied P1an in ac�ordance with�he standazds of 5ecuon 3-7.2. The Board hnds chat the `; proposed P1an.subject to sausiacdon of condirions lis�ed in clus Resolution,adeauaceEy avoids or ;, mitigates Geo[ogic Ha�ard:�reas(5-�01),Floodplain Hazard:3reas(5-}Ql),Wildfire Ha�ard�reas � (5-�0�),F�iscoric and Azchaeological�source:�e�s(S-F07. Addirionaily,the Boazd finds the i proposed land use applicaiion comgiies wirh Land Use Code srandards for Activiries of Local and , ' State Interest(5=407 3.h). Finally,the Boazd finds the proposed land use app&caaon complies with the t�etailed Sabmissioa scmdards of the Code(6--�). . ' i . _ - � ___._....._ __-.... .. �,.� / _ �.' t''�,. Y ,. "` . �; ; . :� . i ' ' , � . � •� � ;,.-+�-�---- _ -- -- _ , _. Yr� ��: � ..�._ :. _..._� _---- ._._ , �� ,:,. �._.�.� _�. ; .�..,. �....��,.�,:-. .�.. � t��4�` 1'"i�,l,: �� ' 1 .� , Resolution�Io-_ ,�tS.;. ��. Page� , '�, NOW, TSEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the $oazd that it does hereby �ant Deuilcd Submission.P�anned LTnit Deveionmenr.I041 Enviroz�menrai IIazard Review.and Soeeiat Review " - appmvai for multi-faaaily and ;erait uses for ?.HV suoject co the condicions tisced 'oelow. , :�dditionally,the Boazri does he:e�y�ant?.HV 11 Yfeso.�cea w�ris�accommodauon allouue�. 112 Merm area affosdaole nousing silomtents for an at�ordable housing deveiopmea[attd a;?ifeun flrea free maricet housing ailocmeacs for au�Fi associated deveionment. Si5S1�� ,� ',�. - i � i. z�]I conditions oi BOCC�zsoluuon�io.96-i1l ;i�ail�e adhered to unless snec:ncaily R modified by cfie te:ms oi:hese conciirioas. . ' ' ?. The.apolicant suall adhe:e:o atl�ate^ai represearauons made in che snniicsrion. � ? suupiemeacai:nate:ials.xd:n�uDiic:ne�:ino�. 3. The apniicant or deveiogmeat�nuty'snail�e:esnons:oie:or�ll mateaai�nreseatauans - �nade in Gene:al Sunmissior De;aiied Sutrcnission.=inai P?�.;he?(�C�nuoi ! Documeac and�e Su�di�ision snprovzmenu.��*e�aeac i SL4). in the�:�za:oi ; coa$ic�ng representariens:iur.ng*.ne`our;�ear;and•�se:e,�iew oroc�ss.:he:ast ! re�resentauons�ade snail conu�ol. � ' y;�r^c:T-ansiv"?'*anspor.arion,p�r�'R� i -F. Prior to Deraile�5ui�diy'ision auproval by;he 30C�_:ke�npiicant and:ae C�unr:snati � develon and a�ea upon s pi�asing pian;hat cieariy:denunes Lhe ddersiup thresnold on � ' the zYisring C�le:"Vfazoon Roaring Fork Transit.�sency i RF'I':�)route rhat•.viil sibge:a } requirement ior:he anuiicanc to make a cash payme��o RFT�:or:he purchase�nd ; operarion oi one addiriona!�us on che:oute. ?he��*+ent�vill��tipulate:he amount of � money the applicant tivill pay to Piticin Counry tor incm�sin�rhe!cvet of servic�on rhe j Castle�Maroon rouce. In he�vent RFT<�reptac�the Castic v[aroon route with snorher foim of u'ansit,Pitkin Cuuncy may use the applicants payment for such reolacement , u-ansit serrice however.�e ceplacement service must provide senlce to:�fiV. 5. Prior to Decailed Subdivision approval by the BOCC,ihe applicant and the Counry shall a�ea upoa an operations and service phasin�plan for aa ondemaud(Dial-a-Ride)transit , system to be operated by rhe applicant 6. Prior to Detailed Su6division approval by the BOCC,the:�spen Skun�Campany(ASC) and the County shall agre�upon an operatians and setvica phasin;plan for a remote �t parkingf slaer shutrle service to be aperated between AEiV and 235 ttew desi�ated F: remooe parking spaces to be established at Buttetmilk Siri Area, . : , .. _, ..._ ._ __. _ "��'+"�-a . . _ . _,__ _ N �� _._ , � �% ; - 4 • �; � ' ��' " — " . ��R. ' . " . . ' . . ��//�^� _ -.. ...._ _�_._. __ _'�_ ' _"_ .. . ._�_.�.�.._�._ m.� �>� __ _ ___.�=-=� ,..:N.:.. v��,::,. . - ;� +,, ' � `; �� 7: .:Y� 7,�.,,` j,� ,'�:'tt�,- �- • ' Resolurion No.9?-^ 'i a Page 6 < �.,' 7. Prior to Derailed Subdivision anpmval by the BOCC,the applicant and*he�ounry shall agtee on a comprehensive�affic/transir/naricing monitoring svstem plan to oe;indertaicen by tbe applicant ihis pian shall inciucie measures to iasure iacreased miugarion acrions if mbnitoring shows rhat:he mirigarion nlan is nat adeauate. The 3I;�snail reauire rhe �" � :�pplicant to aci_+*+�n;�e:_ne monitoring plan chroueh che conclusion oi?�ase i of the consuuction.anri ior:hres,�ears therearter. The moniaorine sysrem:xddress che:o[lowing ' ; issnes. i � � [ a. If the u:ns geae:ated by.�I�%�xc�ed projecuons in he"Reti-ised�faroon C,eax Corridor Desailed Transponacion P:an".F�flruai°:. 1997.so�s�o.-�uire miri¢arion_or�ose additional:mnac's.he additionai uitigzrian:eauired bv;he � anplican[:nusz;e�enroved�v;he 3QCC�ased snon_eromme".d^.rions oi*.he Communit;��e�:eionment�eparrment Znd any:D�roDr.ate:e:e.:..i aQer,c•:'e.�_.. (�FT�and/or:�e'��antv�a�inee:.n;). ; b. If che numoe:.�i+:ns;ene:ate3 is lo�r•zr*han�roiec;�d.hea he��oniican[sitall ce i • • � enritled�o sua_e<_:a=educ:ion in:he�aiiic:niuearion pro�ams�;,e^.aein� � nuided. Suca ro�ec:ion suail oe base3 unon a hnaiing�y che 30CC:haL:he -- � reducuon:s apnrepr.ate. In no c�se.'�owz rer.shail:ne�pniicsnt::e�ii�o'te:or a .eiund or any�or3on ui the ins.u-mic:,uz donarion.:esc:ibed`.a�ara3aou� below. fi . - c. The ST.a siiail spec.fy�hat rhe applicanc snail be:esnonsiole:or-he oeriormancs of chis condirion and securir,r for such pezormanca sua11 be grovided. 1 i t tg, The uansnomuon and air quality monitoring required Sy the�pplicant shail be the j subject of an annual�ePort which shall coatain at a minimum rhe followins intormarion: �. � 1; Daily weather conditions. 2. Notation if�lspea schools aze open on given day. , 3, Air qualiey teadi.nQS at�Iaroon Creek and downtown monitors. 4. Daily skier visiu based upon AsQen Skrin�Company surveys—this data may nat �� ; be available for zach day. � �,'J � '. . 5. Daily parking loc counts and HOV coimts. � �� , �t !. . . _ F} ;;'.:'_ : � . � ...: �'.:-. ..._..._ . � ��:'- A : j,. ,.: .. .. ' � ........ ..... ... ... ... . . ... . . . . � F t'.�� . i . . ' -��, �, � . � � � �; , , � '. ♦ . . . , � i _ . � �.-_. _---- — .._.-- _ ___ ...._----�—..�--1 . '�, � ....__.._ . :a..> �._ _____ � ,iS..� � �. ':�, .:��,.c<.r. . ..... .. .. - . �r � ��1`' '��:^. � �� :�t}+:`. trk�. ;a� Resoiutian No.97-_ Page 7 �> 6. Daily RFiA ride:snzn—on survey days data wiu be collected idenufying skiers , ' vs.non-skiers vs.�mployees. 7. Daily noTation or any;pecia!event taking piace at:�spen Eiigh2ands. 3. Daily a�ic counts at snecinc locarions co be idenufied by�he anplicant snd the i=: I� Counry Transnorrauon Consultani. ' l., ` 9. Daiiy�ouuu oi�ars aariced in Aspea:iiQhlands Subdivision ur�c Iseiin?ark. 10. Esrtaoiisn set days to da surveys in parking lou—surveys to inc:ude: poinL oi � . oriein.peonie in car.cype oi nass.skie:s vs.non-side�_HOV's. � ?1. �Jaiiv;ndic�tion'_r zrea:s:n ares�vere swe�t-hac day. 13. Cour[esy san•.'son-oII counu. # 13. Si�ss�n�caLe?.i��vay 32 and Vlazoon C:eeic Road and the�i�ee:on=amc svuea ; � ;i;ns aoric�:hat�ars:na!oc is:ull or:hat�aid�arkin�is in e;fec:—siw+Eocauons ishouid'aciude:�r.or to i ie�ac!c,Prior:o Bnuh Cree's Qoaci.Castle i C:e�!c�[atoon C:e��c. j � • � g, �pp�r�nL�as a�te�d to d�naze 56�0.000 for:nuasuucnue improvemenu:ilon�he Viaroon Cree�'Casrie Cree!c;Hi�:nway 32'intersecrion aad�Iazoon CreeeK Road. The ; j applicant Uas aLso commiaed to a donauon o#S 350.000 for long-range impro�emears�o { the C:astle l�laroon inie�ecrion as aatt of the EnBance to:�spen FEIS. The donauons ` shall be made unon Finai?lat recordarion. , } t 10. The Pianni�and Zonine Commission strongly encourages that the pzoposed short-cerm � improvemenis m the Cascie�'Vlazoon/Highway 82 incecsectioa be.made for�h�virh and that � . the County and City work togeiher to devise a mutually acceptable and cimely soluuon to ' the ongoing problem. 11. The 4�0 space skier pazidng lot sY�atl be paid parking when the std area is open for skung. Utilization of summer pazking shall be reviewed by the BOCC two years after complerion of Phase Four to decermine if paid parldng should be implemented. 12. Consisteat with exzsang practice,the primary stagiug for the iVfaroon Bells bus shail not � occnr at AIiV-Ihe prefeaed start point for�rtazoon Bells tours shall be at Ruby Pazlc For �:' down-valley visitors,using RFTA or the hain there sba11 be a hansfer at the proposed srarion at the intersecrion of Highway 82 and yfaroon and Castle Creek Roads. The . � 1 _ _ _ _ ._._. �`,',� __.. . __- k „ i : <E 5 t . � _ . . , . . '1.'. . . ` �. -I.� . , . .. � -� .. � � , i . . . . . '�, . �.�,.,.�_�_ ._ ...__.,._.._.. _.._., _. _._ . ...-------�� q�� _.,_ �. ,�.. -. ^ .: � _----- .�,. N�;��'�': ....��,�f�L, . � . . �hYwl�.fr�lkF��.. ,y'`�, ti ��'... Resolurion No.97-_ ,_a;, Pa3e 8 . ' "' "- . -:,ir� - 1.� lvlazoon Bells cour buses shall ick- riders ac Hi �` °� � P up ghlands and tickeu shail be availabie . for sale co Higalands resicienu and��PRC. '�c . ' . �=�` �� rc tia�," �nrh sn 1x7Si -�ici4rred�nm t�i' n •�• w i:_ _ .,:� r �up � - - .��7��` , . � • :i::: , Y '� 14. �e anplicant snall consuit��+ir�t RF'?i prior*.o Deauied Submission approvai co reviecv ��'.:>�' . . the plan ior transit iaciiiries az a.HV. ':�::.`- - >,-;:.. , 1�. �1ny overilow nazlang.vne:he:xom srie:s,or:esicienu,or visitors.o the viiiase si�ail aoc �`�.. ' be allowed on Vfaroon G-m's�oad or other gublic aents af way ia che aei�noornoou.if parkin�on the V[aroon C:e`.�C Road becomes a problem.;he annlicant will�� ''" � D_.I.:...^.......... ...:�...-..,.-:...._.�....:..:�.. . . ].= .. _ . _ ._ _: . . assist?itk:n C'�unr.••n�niorc°�ne^� �7'h+� nrovision•hrou�-i�m g�n��uniic��varenesc-�P�curea �;� � .,f' II u . o �,� . �6. �Il 3llalt JI°F'1u'ime�_ui��aienc�:nnlovees"-siiail be��onducxd at:he�o�iic:iu's � e.mense�ne•�e�r afte:c�mpi��on oi°hase:our. The anolican�snail oe res�onsioi�:or • r� housin;miti�auon ui sn}�.:nnio�er_enerauon ove:and ibove:has coniemniated zt�he time oi"�etaiieci Subdivis:oa:�nrovai_ If-he:enuired audii shows a:educaon:n �` empioye°•�ene:auon he::ppiieant may;ee!c n e�dit:o'ae ised on oche:P:ticin County projec�s. 1 i. The anoiicant shall be atlowed to iease nvo Czte2or�=Zvo-oedroom uni�s ro auaiined employees of the applicants choice. � � i$. The applicant shall be allowed to�ell(initiai sale only):our sinele-family homes.:our a , town homes,and twa aae-bedroom unics co q�alified emnloyees of the applican�'s c�oice. ! In all cases minimum occupancy:eouiremeats of the Housin��uthorirr muss oe met alon�wirh the qualification that in the three-and four-be3room units,at least one of the individuals must be a dependeat as defined in the Housing Authority widetines. 1 19. Prioriry£or the use of the pronosed domucorv units shail be Qivea to�nployees of rhe . � project or the Aspen Slding Compaay durin�the fall,winter and spring-In the summer " season use priority will be for Vlvsic Associates af�spen midents,ecnployees and/ar teaching staff. 5 . �: 20. 13e floor pians for the doimitory uaits shall be reviewed by the Housing Office for their �� , . recammendation prior to Detailed 5ubmission approval by the$OCC. ' �h-- y i ,:• '., ,: i..;� ----_ __ J. _ _. . �'.r'.. i � _ 1.,:� ,. � � * . . . :j,. .- � '. � . �.H ' ' . . . '__—".� __ -' ._. ..__. ._"_...___ . . � ' ._. __.__ ._—_"_ ' . a„} . _ - ....._ ., _ _ _...____.__----.��,,, . ��.., ,.,�,:..,,.� .. :. „ . ... . . � ._ .%�:. `a��;'; ��>' .�`,.,' };�., ��'; Resolurion No.9?-_ `'a � P�3e 9 21. All designated afforda't�le nousing shall be approrniazely deed res�icied and suca resaicrions shall be recorded prior to conveyance oi such housing. i: � '? Those 1ou which�xul�e permiaed to t�ave caretaker Uniu shall be desienazed un the Final Plat. �: - ! 2.i. The use oI transie:able de��elooment rigi�ts("TDRs")si�all be as approved in�eaezai ! submission,pmvided'nowever.that the tocal loor�rea exempted from�nwm � man�emenc:or�very TDR aansfe:red is�,U00 square:eez�nd any addizional squore j footage beyond�.000 square fesi for any single unit utiliring a TDR shall reauire� ' growth ID1II�emeaL�ilo�eat or an addition:li�DR ?"ne reauired .T7i Rs-r.us�'�e �g�ir d�or-o aR�rncai�t-inai�I_2L• . i ; 24. �ordable nousing snail ae consrruc.eri and made zvaiiai�ie accordine:o he�nasino�lan 't, as�reseated in:he:�Tine::desc:nuon in aDpendiY!1 ui:he"De•.ailed Submiss;on" - documeac and:he"°':asing"site gian in che"�i�V Dezailed Submission:�upoiemeatal Repoa",�oriL i997. ��viro m�n2a�L? �ithi a ir�ialirv � S - f 'S. Prior,o approvai oi Detaiied Suomission by�he BCCC.the aaplicanc shall provide a i lett�demonstrating abiiir�anq wiilingness.o serve:he project�r-ith domestic:vaze:a�om� ! ; , eirher the City of�snea or ihe 3spen Highlands�Vate:and Sanitarion Distric� [n the i ; ; absence of such leite:the applicant must present�nd have approved by�he County pians I � for a private domes�cic water system. t � } � 26. Prior to approval oi Detailed 5ubmission by the BOCC the applicant shall provide � � evidence that the project will be served with public sewer�s provided by the�spen � Consolidated Sanitation Disaict. : i � 27. No buiIding permits for the parl:ing s�ucture shall be issued until such time�s the Staie � of Colorado Depazaneat of Health approves the ventilation system for the parking ' strucnne. The venrilation system s6all be presented m the Pitkin Counry Environmental Health Department for review aud commeat -.�. �, Nn hn;idj�nermit shall be isc+,ed�ntil a fu�riv ��t ontro].,plan has be�reviewed ��-- and anoroved�v the Environmental Heralth Dena*+??±ent. ! E �:: ..� .---.._ __ . _ ----- _ __ .___ _ __ f .._. ._ . ,. �� . , � ;;`-° ; .;, . � _ , ;_ , , - _ _- . .-K_. . �:�.--_____�_--- _ ___ --- , � :.� ,.,._�. � _ . - ; _. --— _ f ,. — —�.�__ —.� _.. —..... '�.� __. ., n._.,. _.. . ..,., . . -�- _. _.. (. ��! . �°`.'�� `:��`;�'`° . '-��ti;.. :;tifk�.;. ;r.. . Resolurion�Io.97= Page 10 �i� � t�,nd��P311:'Tree Preservatiorti We�d Contml . ��,� '?3. Priar to Detailed Suomission auprovai by the BOCC the Councy Land Vtanaeer shail j;��'.:` approve rhe:�i�i wesd conffol plan ior all areas to oe disturbed. i�.. � �9. All stoc:�miled soiis:viil be zeaced�xitii a biode�adable aydro mulcz�o serve:s a 4ust (..:` � palliarive. , � 30. The rnonosed!andscanin�scro..aing=long Vtaroon C:eek Road suail be compiei..ir.d:n che tirst�otiving seeson aiter�omnierion oi;he pazking 3mlcture,and proje�:�n�%�vay. 31. The«iitrout Pond area�aail��e�nuancrd with additionai'andscaninv zs-ito��r.,�n'he ' �� . _ 3�. P:ojec:iis¢tina:e•:eis_��anda:ds.�nd`_imirarions si�il camDiy;virh �'>r�;�z.aued . Submission:Suonleazeatai�enon"�rnii.i997. ?,nese srandarcis:ti�il ae:nc:uded:n:ne � �H�i?L�Doc.imeat:o ae�donted st*_ne same�ime as:he Subdivision:m�rove:r.e:ts , i ��eemeaL j . - . i33. �1.e^ised lanciscaninQ:ian:v-nicn iimiu�b.e�se oi:;attonwoods shail oe suomined:or j review by che C�unry'_.and Vlanager and the Communiry Deve:ooment�egar.meai sad j ; . - annroved by�he 30C�st�e*,siied Subtnission. `�%iidflowe-soecies-o.?e•zaed rnusr�e !i�*Pd�v:e�enrino lame and co mon� me�nQ-n,cr; narive,-�rcies�ndioe.^.oas'o�he Rnarin�� i�il •� � `oeai:vildflowe-�e�ci:oua°-nLCr be�+ced�vith-he <e�d ro�e � 4ollected 1'rom*.he Roaring�ric 4 atIev. � � . } 34. Laadscaning associaLed with Phases 1 through 1,as depicted in ihe detailed submission . � documeats,shall be contained in derail in The Subdivision Improvemeats��'e�menc � ("SIt1"). The:�ppticant shall be resnonsible for the perfarmance of all laadscapin� associated with Phases I throu�h-4 and the performance of all landscapin�obligarions � ' shall be secured through one of the following performance waraaLees:bond.letser of credit cash escrow ot a warantee enforceable by tlie Counry or the City upon anne.eauan. The security shall be in an amoeuit�ua!to one hundzed percent(100%)of rhe essimazed cost of completion of the landscaping. �5_ The SL�shall specify a definite Iandscaping phasing schedule,which includes the speciftc amin�for all landscaping installation along with each phase of the development '<< �-> 36. The ST�.shall require the applicant to provide waiantees for alI plant materials for two " growing seasons after iaitial iastalladon. � i. . ' . : __... _ y __ _.. ,._.._ _ . �a`�s �. . .._.. - --_.,�_..._ __ . _ _ . � .. . . . .� 1.. � , 4 ^ r ` : , � ♦ . .. . •. Y��. �-�^�—__—•--_ _.. __.. —-- .— . — ._-.._ ..__..___.�� . ;�� . _ , . _ _ _-�-'. .. �-- - - - , . , , ..�. T��,.' ��;a�i:r:�..,.n. ,,, 1�.: ._ n . .. �.�l,. . .� .w!n. -tir�tF,1 f�,...._....,...�..'..o;.;�.�'r, �� *+�.,ti.... .. . �.. ��`+ �' .� . ?fi�'lry�AY i I. .'}_�a':. � .,,kY S'!.;• i� �� ,RCSO1l1II0II�0.97'__ � .,' �,�,. Page 11 � ti": 37, The SIA shail require the appiicanc to reveget�te all disturbed areas. These are�s shall be pianted with a mienue oi;ndigenous�asses and wildflowers and the use oi invasive �';r.�' �asses shall be pronibiced. i:�:' i:•`•� , 38. The SIA shail include a weYd consol plan.partic•.uariy in the wildflowe:meadows_ I'he � firsc leve!ui weed conaoi suouid be non-chemicai.:houA,h chemicals may be�er.nirted ii weed controi:ails. � i= 39. The single-family landscanino requiremenu shail be included in the.�I?��Conffo! Document The single-iamily landscanin;*eauire:aeats shail be specificall.�=uorc�ble k: by the Counn%,or�he Cicv inon:uine:carion;ind�nail: �`� � a. *eauue he:e�:ege:�rion oi iil sismrbed�:s•virh�e pianrin�ui s ai�c�ure.�i indiseaous�sses and�viidflo�ve:s.� a'ist.�r�mnoced,Recies�naif;e�r��ide� - tQ�he�":,,,nn:'ane`�(anaver'or-ev�e�v znd�R r�vai nrior-o aRnrevai ••r-±nai � • �� . - Ib. mm�ibit:he use oi sil aon-iidiQenous?lant snecies.�araculaziy:m�asive�=*_�sses: 3 c. proiubit landscape:iearin�tsce�L to che e:a�nt aecassary br�aierv purooses � �vhicz nee�ssirv shail oe aece:mined bv Community Deveiopment:�r i C�uncc ;eie:zal asenc.�. ' T � =FO. Tree removal wiil be!imit:.d*.o anproved buudins:avelones and platted drive:cays.:oads 4 ri�hts-of-way and uriIiry corridon. 6 11 ± ; 41. The laadscapin�improvemenu committed to by the applicant as parc of the detailed � submission shall be specific obligarions of the anplicant or his assi�s. 4 �S_i_atV'�/��ncec_ _ , 42. Prior to Derailed Subdivisioa approval by the BQCC a benchmark elevation wi116e ;: established in the proposed Village Core in otder to provide a reference point for reconsQUCted�ade and all other elevation measuremeats. 43. All variances from current Code standards w�71 be established in a PUD Conffol ;'-�� `�=: Documeat to be adopted at final plaz approvaL Any subsequent varinnces shall require � , i modification of the Detailed Subdivision agproval aad a trvo-step P&Z and BOCC review • ' � , ,; i i : . i . . � Yf.c::.�' 1 11� : . .. . _'"'_ "" ..........._. . �.:. . . ........_ ...... .. �::, e:. . . ..._'�"_" . ..... -__._ . . ...�...... ... ... .._�. . . . _ . ,.. ... .' . . "_'.:.... . . . ' . / , y { •,. �' : ... . 'I' � + . . , . _ ...— ._ _._ , .,�, �_ _.. ._.__ — ... , a,r � � ��,. :�. - - _�_ - �,.,. , .. ��,+�� r ,•`�;�,, � ti��.; Resotiction No.97- ,��t� ;�`$t,f4`, Page 12 � y' "= . :';:i_ � '�. .y.: 1' except for vatianc�wnich may qualiiy as N[inor�mendmenu to a Deveiopment Pemiir i�`: .• under Code Section=-_DO.SO: ' ' .:�.. Y::�`:_ c{4. The heigut oi all stnunues ia the vlazoon.Thunderoowt Neighborhoods�NiII be • ��:>:�:�_.;,,��: measured from zhe T�Ps esrabiished'ov a S"'�pian approved by che BOCC in an adonted PUD C�nzroi�oc•ame�. In:he case of any sraains.manipularion.virhia a 'a�.,. ;.. building eaveloae wilic:^.air.eis ctris aciooced��raciing plan.heigat measurement•.vili�e '`�; : �... . ' from the nnai finished��de or:he acioated�adin�plan wuich eve:is more:esaicave. , �`�, ;, ,,s-.. i, 45. A topographic man of thz reronsaucted�ade.as presented in the Decaiied Submission :'+�r " 1 l.: anpiicarion and disc•assea wirii:l2e Plannin,nnd�oning Cummission an_-�orii-.:99�. will be inc?uded in rhe?!�Conaoi�ocument:o be adonted ai*_he same_une.:s:�e �,'- Suodivision:mnrovemears a�esmeac. Ihe.e��nsuvc:�d,nade topo�rannic:aan snail ''*� ��be uriiized as cne basis_'or�easurins:he aeis_at oi;ul�mtc�ures;n:he�%iilaee�=ore y including[he�a%ing�nd:ransii drop-oT�area. ,� j �6. 311 se:bac:cs�vul�e�su:clisned by�uiioins anveiones saown on a site�ian anc:abie in i � �he?L-D Conaoi Doc•.mment_o be adonced at iinai piaz a�rovai. �t i , �'. rioor�rea�vill be meas-,ued aad denned in�he°T�D Conffoi�oc•�uneat.o oe idopted at final plat anprovai. . �8. Pmtecrive coveaanrs shaiI oe suomitted:o[he County prior to approval�i ike_utal�lat. . .c', �9. Prior to BOCC De.ailec�u"omission anprovai.;he anpiicant shall provide�oacepu ior the proposed a�cehitecmral gvidelines for ihe single-family units which�hall proiiioit teflecuve metai roofs,or any other roof material thaz tends zo reflect lig:oL The single- family houses'roof mate;ial will be restricted to blended aarth tone co[ors_ 50. Tke spplicaat shall not�e permitted to consrruet any building with a reflecIIVe meral roof or any other roo£materia!that tends m reflecL light S 1. No development or cleazing of vegekation outside of established huilding envelopes, � � uriliry cortidors or platted roads wili be permitted. Plantin�of indigenous species of plaats and uees will be permitted outside of building envelopes. No[and forms Irigher j. than thzee feet wi1l be allowed w be consnucted inside building envelopes. � .. , . � � � -� I ` . ____. + , . _.�_ . .: . .�. /. fF , �� , , : - : I�` . . . , _ , .,N , • � . �_�--r-�-. ._. .._._._�._.. . _ .__�. _.. .._.._ ...__.._�.._�_.� . �er� _. � � =_:: - ----- � .,�; _ _ �:.;:._�., ��; � !�`'�"�: . ,�� ,:� x'�� . Resolution No.97- ::'��::` Page U" � ' i �� . ::�' 52. ?,decailesi consmicuon nxt�c'Parking mana�3emenr/phasing.ptan shall be submi�ted for . . review by the County Engineer prior to anpmval by ihe BOCC of Derailed Submission. The aQplicanc shail provide a plan wlrica ac a minimum addresses the following: !' i._'. . �w - � The sequence oT consmicAOn: j ': �.:. . i b. 1he hours of px�oposed consuvcrion for sach day oi the Heek; ��- � c. The proposed pe:mitted�ielive.y nours:�nd � e ' d How the car-pooling,-etc.will be entor�ad _ ��. The Pitkin County�ioise�Jrdinance must be adhe:ed co at ail times and;inv or:•ioiarions ` sviit resuit iu a�oronriace��orce:nent:nd sane.ions. s ; �4. Durine consuucaon_ao_ar';:ag•.viii be pe:mined�y any:ii�lands visitor.=mnioy�.or • i � conaactor�scs�t on-site�r�noroved pooiin;_oc�tions. � ; � � �5. Yo does shall be�ernune��n rhe consmicaon site. i � raina��r�'msion C.�ntroi � ) � � - �6. Prior to rinal Piaz annrovai�c the BOCC a Storm�yater VI2II3gemeat P!an�v4ich includes at a m;n;.num a�onn�cater pollurion prevenrion component sha'tl be submitted j f and approved by the County Eaeineer_rhe Solid A%aste:�Iana�er,che Srate,nad Direcior I ; of Environmenral Heaith. Ihis nlan shall�ddress the maintenance of the�arious � acomponents oi the stortn water pollurion pisvenrion,such as dn'�e uf ponds,removal } and disoosal of siit and deiais,mainrenance of the condirion of siIt fencin�,removal, ; disposal,and replacemenc of hay bales and other prevenrive measures. f � , 57. All permanent infrasmicnn�e subject to the Suhdivision Improvements��eement shall � be cieaned by applicaat and inspected by the Counry Ea�neer before acceptance._ F 58. Prior to issuance of development permit the appGcaat shall submit a final�adin�and drainage plan for the approvai of the County Engineer. Tliis pIan shall show tiie typical details and locations of riprap suvctures. � . . . � � �': �. — -- _ __ - -— ___ --- --- _.__. �_..__. .._:.: �� _._;.,.. _:_.. � . ��- ..._ . A' . q . � _ I . . . r.I�_. , ti �; ♦ I . . . �. ., . q`' � .".".'_ __..._�_._"" - ._.__�.._ .._ ._...__..�.-, . • . ` � �'} .. . � � ��'�, ;��*`. ��'��' t, ; Resolurion No.97- �;-• �^�f" Page 14 "' '`" . "t:,.; .s; �. p�rks nnd Schoois Deaication Reg�irPm n c "' ��.'�� 9. Requirements for parks and schools Iand dedicarions or cash-ia lieu fees shall be as per �"� '� the Laad Use Code. '::. ' . -`Y::`,,i. ;;;:,�... � � ��'"� i , NOTIC'�' OF PUBLIC HE�1RL•'�1G P'UB�.ISHED L�I THE �PEN TIN[RS WEF .Y ON THE 23M3 DAY OF atTGIiST,2997, �„ INTRODIIC�D. :�`�D �'1R.ST RE�D �.T THE REGLZ�R V[EETI�TG ON TI� lOTH �` = DAY OF SEPTEiEiYIBER 299i.. `��'' T ,;� ..� - �I'PROVED ��TD �DOPTrD .�FTER SECOND RE_3DPiiG ��TD PLBCIC HE.�RIi�IG � ON iHE.'.dTH DAY OF SEPTE.'V1BER.1997. � � . ,+. � PUBLISSED �FTER�DOPTION L�I THE �SPE�I T'T1RF�S WEEKLY Or THE i DAY OF .1997. a,' ATTEST: BOARD OF COUiVTY COMNIISSIONERS . OF PITKIl�T COUiVTY,COLOR�DO - , Jeanette Jones Bill Tnite,Cfiairman . Deputy Clerk and Itecorder ' DA'TE: �` ,. . f��.,' ' ._. . . . � �I�� . .. q 'j '• _.. _---.... ... .,..�. _... __�_-.. .....,_ ,.._.,:.... � _,. _ ,i li . . - --'-----'--.. _ . ..___..--".�:._- ' . __./ . _�.__.__.........,_�.. . . _ ��,t . y , -. . _ - t.:. . � . . . . -- . ,�' . •. � . .. . '� � --�-- -- � _.----.--, , �..,�--- . . ._.....----- . _." , t . :,.,� ,�:,. :� .�... �, ,Slh A . �_. � . � I 14 ' 1 y��F �- t..T ` "''�, 'M+'�� ....t.t.'�i./Unf�V.r.:Ji. .,,. �:..�Y�'.+"'., e 0.'r�_ �e+il' .ri; .�.. :Y�hA`J .i��'td��9i'SJ.e6"Ju�S3�d.,��'�+��a l +;F_ ~ � �i . , � ti�. � � �v '. I ��i•��.'i�'4�;i +y'� ''' � Resolurion No.97- � Page 15 � }:r� :;, f� `�� . ,�., :.:,� i. � . - `�< ' ',- i : I p:. � ;s�':<�,:~ , , .:,�" ;:- � ?iPPROVED�S TO FORM RECOMIYYIENDED FOR�DOPTION �` 4 ' � N�,5 j 3 ' John Ely � Cindy Houben �'Kq. t V`� ; County�ttorney Cummunity Deveiopment birecaor � i - ,� P132-96 � � . .c:` f: .' . � .? : } • . . 1' _ i . + �. , _' . :�: i �.� I . . � r� , I . � � . . . ' . t i; i � , 'k; ! : .,"__. . ___ ' __ .__ ._..-_..,` , . r,__,..._, >��.,.�_ .._....:.,:..._ - ..,:-_......�....,:.�• �iA;� � ' � � . . " � ' � �'.�+ •5. � • . � _, 1 . . ��,.' ��l . � . . . � � ' - . �, J . . . . �- �... :1.,` . � . . -. .*' . � . ' : . . . . _`_ .. . ' . . . ' � . � . _ ' ' . a *. _ . - ---- —�._-- -----_� �� -� . � ' ATTACHMENT 4 r�a�t�� `.� � �x��fi`, . � ..P;��{c;�_.; . �•rt.3%'�l:t: . ORDINe�YC�.'OF THE BOA,RD OF CO[7P1Ty COMIVIISSIOIYERS '-��'" �•• . OF PTTIffi`i COUi ITY.COLOR�IDO,G12�,N'T1NG REZONIl`iG OF THE �_ . � �SP.FYi ffiGHL.�YDS�1II.L�1Gr.STTE FROM aF�SKI.�R 1.R-30.:iE-i �,�' � TO�R t PUD/?�HO,�.i0 PUD.R i5 PUD.�'�-i�PUD/AHO,:1F-SIQ, ;:•... � �HPUD/r1H0�`(D�..YIE.`iDING THE OFFIC7�1I,COUNTY ZONLYG.l�te�P ; '� ': � Or3in�nce No.97- ��,� �.;: � f..: `v.,:;. 1. :�:..° Ylountain L:mit� �"�C:'Sf31D. �S�C� .1ollI2II�S �iounrain _:mi�ed =:aniiity Compaay,3svea :�.iealancis :,;i^s��reotarion. :4aivoie'�au vess �unes aad ::ia� :i�iands ` �:mited ?armersuin, ihe:einaii�: °.re::�a =o �s ".apniicam''; aave anpiie� :o ?::;cin •_�unrv =or approval of the_�spea i3igJilar.�'s��:iiaQe�roje�:. �e apnric�tion�pe�:iic:ily,-�uesu�nmti�ai:or i RezoninQ, Soecial Revie•.v_ Gro�L,� �fanaQemeat (?uota Svse:a �,emprions '"1_�IQ�.., :md De•.aiied �ubmissioniP!annea '__...�e�.z:enmeat :"?�?�"•. ::1C .�.ii.r:l =1'?'11a1:(S ��:'1"�� 5II2 :5 .. :OG:LC:1 :Il I1C�/�aICO[S '_...�\ � , 3I-,1� :�52 ?I:e . - ,. =;�=r�`nc. ��ici .-_-_ =.G _..^L:1PS . � 23DllL0`C1I''aLCj;! n :1C:�S. .:.. _... CS �UI'° SL��_:C:11`i 125C::�� :II �_.lC:i ... -,:d . . Jl1D(lIV1S10ILPT_D �.:C.'IC:11 ��liC^.:-SiCII :cP.S ;�DIO�•2Q 'VIL^. �CR�'4'IIOIIS_ S .•:1'(..°..^.C': '� 30��..--.1' ��I f County�=�mmissione:s '.30�.:.�;", t�ciu�on'S-:=_ ��.:.ibi�31. �'�e 3oarc�crovea:�e.:�pe.1 3i�nianas'i:ila;e�e•.aiiea�u.;r�s:�r1"_-^•»e��:.i��er�;onme^t-.r-tT,^._�naiticrs s e::��r.c�:n � . �02I��2SOj11L10II��-_ � . � F . _. _RC:.Y1S'�n�r�R1IIv'.S �_tCL�]v 1:IlSO:II_.II103i:.. ^.e _oilowir.s spe��:c r��oni� � � aCT10I1S aI'C:ECllCSiCC13Ila:S2�_��IC:��u 3_*..aD:IT=1�7DA J. � �;. . � j � __" .ic:e .ar.:a: -�zenri ::om �-_0 :Suauroan 2zsideauali. .-;.:-Siu ! : j ;��ic•.unu�.-ir�ures.^�•;�ic:and a�'�-_�)� �c•.unuairForesa�nReside:s�aii :0 2-�U f � ?T t7��uouroan��sideariai P'.anne3�-ait Jeveionmeni�: � I i � i b. =.I�4G ac� =arcei :�one3 frnm :t-_0 (Suburoaa Resideauai). .�r'�-i0 1 � ; (.��ic.iltural/F�res.:.�iR�idearial.and R-_0 co:1H°L'D.-�HO l:-�:jorc.aoir 4ousin, f }' ; Planned Lnit De•:e!onmcu�Tiordable Ho"��Ove:iay): � S : �` { c: 3�.�16 acce par��'. tezoned from :1F-SiCI (�Q*ic•.ilturaUForesuy/Ski). �FR-l0 i � i (,�,�ic�,liuual .' Foresmr�Residenual), R-_0 (Residearial Suburoanl, :LR-! � ' (,�ccommodarions;Rz�arioa) *.o �R-1 PL�D �..zFO (3ccommodauons;Rec�srion Planned linit Deve!opmeni�frordable Ao"��O�erlay); ' d ,745 acre parc�!:�oned+som AR-1(.�ccommodauons/ Recrcuioa)to�H?UD AHO (.-�ordanle HousinQ Planned Unit Development t�ffotdanle Housina i: Ovalay); � , . I� - i ;: r l , � _..._ _ _ .------ •- _----. __. , . ________ _...� _ _--.. _- ,_...._ .,. � ..__.__. . _..... �� 1 __ ,. � . , t.' � �` ,. , q�,' , ! . . � . . , ., —_.—._., N• � �.��- ._...._...__ �_.".. .__ ._'_ ' .".�_ . ar� �?� . -�- .,�...., . _ ___ y__ " ' .. : 4 .. i `��, �`�:` �;��:-=: ;.��t, ,; ' � Ordinance No.97- ' . �, Page 3 '`a e. .;I��cre pazz�'t�oned iom:1R-i i accommodarioas i Rec:earionl to R-.� PUD �'�:`�;, 3Fi0 �Viode:aie �e�siry Residenrial °lanned �� 7eveiornnent �ordable r.,. �Iousng Ove::ay, I,-:. ; :. 6.�69 ace parcaE rozcned avm.�R-: i?.ccommod:mons. 2e...^:eaziont md_-1F?Z:0 ! (r�icuiwraii��resc:=%�:sidentiail eo R-:�?CD ISumuaan:�easirr 2�sideaciail: is_ 11.5;3 acre �arc�: -�oned from �R-? f�ccommod�ons �e=:earioni_ ��'R-iU ` - r, t;�ir.uturaiiF+;ieSS��':�=Si�IIa1��Q_a.F-:�`ni!��C,:1tLT1Ur�7i°SG';�;]i;:i :J Z-�_ or-D ��p ��,iede�ce �e:sity �esicear.ai?!anne:�ai[�e�•eioamea*. :=ordaeiz _?Oticino i'�ve:�1•:� � ; . t i _ _ !: - , a, :-03� �c°�ar_: =e�nne;i iom a.iZ-_ ��c�ammodarions �-==e:sien; :o .�-5:;._ ' i:��^.c•.ununi :�»su• �esideauail. f _ - � � Zhe:oilowine�:tnibis�xe;a�c:e� =or i�omnie:�desc:rnion oi€ae�:,i�Q �ad�ro�ose;i_on� disQicu: � � I 2:0 l Suuuro��esideatiai)-csnibit E �; I P[,�(P'.snned_nic�e�reioomeat)-E.�cnioit= � I �FZ-�Oi;��ic•.:lnu-sLForesuy�Resideariall-��cuibitCs � ! � d t 'j E c�H(�,ffordaole Housias j-EYnioit T_3 - i ; t � a t1Fi0(rl�ordaoie Eiot,c�Ovulay-E:�hioit I �, � ; � ' " AF Si�(.�ic•.Attu31/ForesuyiSki-EYhibit J . i � �� r�R 1(Accommodations Recreation)-EYhibit K - . �: R 1�(Moderare Deasity R.esideatial)-Exhibit L ! ;. The Boazd �d the Ptanning and Zoning Co*�**+;��+�+ (^Commission'7 oii�nally ` considered the p�csding tezonin� requescs durin� .the Aspen FTi;hlands V�e Geaeral �. = S�mic�on ieview. The Plannin�aad Zoning Commission mommeaded a�proval of the rezoIIlII� . ; _._.__. .__.__ _ , _._. . _ . . _. __ , , �� ' _.... } . � . `: � J 1. � . .. ' � , . . i�t�, � � � " � . . . 1: . - .... �. � ' �. � . . .• -� - � —..._--, ' __. . ..__.' . . . —....___ V ��'�•. . l�.—T�. .____.__—.—._ . . � .P�� : �_ _y1 .. - _____ _ .. ��., : ��K . :1'�. . �. : � .. r N�iw+�..' �4:A:i�1 :. . .. _ . ..___ '-'," !�i . . �x.Y�hY�, � �': }: ' .• ' ��(�ry��',�y��j..� `�.'yt3.�' �I�3IICC�(O.�7' Page� `;�a ;.;. reauesT �na tiea�ai 5uamission md :fie 3oazd :onsid� :ue Commission .-�oramendauon �sing fie Gener�i �ubmissioa Ze:•ie:v. Reciiai !1 :ri 3oard 2esoiution 96-i�1 see �.aioit Sl iat1II�T}72L i:::. . �'3ased:mon:e�rie:v oi�e :�pucation�nd�eeseatations:naae av :,�e .pciic:nr. $e 3oazd�nds:he:e:as=e�a_:�ca�caazige�condiuons:n:�e�iLe•:ic��r: j to jusuiy ne �auestea°zoni�g �s .socsmerted:n`�e_aspen 3i}alands `%illa;e ! Genes�l Sabmission C�nsoiidauon oi Documeau and�Ia�eriais. "F.u�..°rWore. :he 3oar �.cs � :�e :�n�ce:i .�;nu� s :orsis�z^c ��;_` :�_ .�ioe� �rea Gtaerai?!an.s �°_^c�... ::ie 3oarc�c�:�ca:l��zres':�e-V�... _ -__�e�•-s:o';_ .�oasisz:t�:i:a:e '_'%-� �s.n��ih l�lana�eac?�iic•?!an.�caze 3iyativay 3: :��r^idor lfaster '=an :nd -:e �-szte `�Iaroon ;ansensus �caiemeas r_c :_,.. _-�nea 3raa • Cummuniry°t•aa... _,_cnr:.:;�c�:rzr�=r��on o-:.-J..3..zonir.�*�:d �.;c�_--_�•�.�eaL siiall�e"r':!�'.V2`1_L �..- _�:O`:��'.V[llCa�C:.'.:I3;I�2.YllzQ=LLCIXS1S5iCG. , � -F. � ine��maission��ec.r� . ��ns;c°:°a:he:�iic:nrs�onir._ cL:s��.:r_=�_-....v4en Lii�iands `iiilase �e•.^iied �u�Y:ssor_=e�•te�v u�iic :�e=::nss :-eeid'�a �vic:.: ;3.��- �nd � 3urii. _. L99 r li1Q'2:;OtItIII�AG= r�t':.l JT:7C °�IIlII_�a1:ZSL�7852�'iDOR �LC:.^_:� :7�L�ep . � t tldII�eea a:i�inesnc �aanse �. =�nci�ons :a ��e 5[CP '•lC.:*Ci 1t1Q �OiL51S:2.c•: �L:�_ '7e _�oea �� Ganerai Plan ss:merdea. - ; t . � .,. ;'he 3oard conside:e:�:e i�iicau�'s:�onias xauess�ain:n Loniunc�on•o;*,��e 'Snai ` anprovai"iDe�iir.i�unmission::s 2=ubiic:aee��n:uue?0. ':99;�nd:u i sui�::er.c.=�uoiic y hearing on S�be:_�_ 1°Q7. :nrouga out:hese�e�in;s.e�rideac�:uid:es�onc:L�as�ce.�ea ; by the:lonlica�.Stat�'and meWoe:s or he�uniic. � � � ' 6. �go� nn�c ;hac he �apucant znd Coumy followed cve proc°dures ot �he Pisida . � County Lattd Use Cnde Secd.ons�0 and 1-50.30. 3he Boazd tinds rhu die reaues'or�.-oni�Q of approximatiey 70 acres as�escZbe3 in de�.il in this Oidinance and�:�hibiLS is cansisceac:ti1rh t1�e i apqiicable te�ulations, iacludinQ S��on �'•?0�0 af the P�7ain Coaary L•r.ad tse Code.the . j Aspe.n e1r�► GeneraI P1an_ the �spea :�rea Communiiy PL�n, and the I976 Grn�rch • il2anagment Policy Plan and�e C�stle l�t�rooa Consensus Statements and is j�u-ti$e3�ased upon a chan�e ia condirions in tha s-�m�oundin�a� .. 7. 'Ihe Boaxd furthez finds tbaz anoropriate legat notice was provided w the public with+*�Y� {°,. to the:�sQrn H'i�hlanzds V'illav�e rezon,�aad ti�ar t6e Coimty is in compliance with the applicahle - sections of the Pitkin County 7..aad G se Code and the Pit(rin Couary Home Rale Charter. ' • ..ti � ' � , _ _ �'� _ . _. � ; . , -. ' ` �. • . r; ti .1. . 1 . • � � � � ... � .,M1 , • ' ` �.—.�—'—.�. '_ ___...___... _ . ."" "" .__....�_._.�._- . :aLy ._. ,�., J t�, � "aS....�. _ ,;ta:.• .. .,..-.. . ,... � . .,. .� . . . _ � •° �, i`. `l_��,�;:`;�.�"1,�i�l�u`'�t�JLt�i�'i��.�YPa '� � .:� _ /_.t,';,, � t. � �.-ti , �;: ' �r �''� �, � �'.'a�•.r �; .�n�'; -•,:. .. Ordinance�10.97-_ , - . page� ;- .; �� ::; �IOW,THEREFOItE.BE TT ORDAIlVED by:he 3oard that it hereay�-�c¢oniIIg �s '',','` � 3p�N V 2 1 ioT L t l e�S p�i�1�a II O 5 t T'l ll 3 A�e.1S 4CSSC1il7eQ.iII Recii2ls s 1 aIIa-�r'l�the aIIdc�led � 't_� . �.Yisting and pmoosed remuing_aaas(E�cawirs C aad Dl. :ir �tOW,BE iT FIIRTHER ORDA.II`im oy he 3oard�az it here5y smeads che ufficial P' Cu co reitec:�e t�oain � ' rtlaa tmzy zomng maas g,�s:�ep_n desc::oed. ' - �:;,. : �iOTIC'.a;OF PUBLIC�.�,RPiTG�UBLISi�D L�t'�F -��P�'V"I1�EES,�n��ad ;?; day of augusi,199;. INTRODtiC�D�.`1�D =IR.Si��D•u z�ubiic�e�;:nQ•�n'se:Oth�i�une__a97, �'a'x - :�.,. Y �.PPROv-ED j,`rD _�OPT_s.D �-T"....Z �EC�r-D �E3DL`+G �:`rD ,°[.BLiC HE.�RING on:ne:=th�ay•�i��ete.:.�e� :997. ,� - PL'BLi�HED 3r i^.�� 3DOP':'iON �T ?'r'fE ��P��i � S �n �e � ,i:�: ui � .i99i. BOr1RD OF��L�iTY COJ�ItYIISSIOr'F�'2S OF?TT'iCT(i C�L�i i�i,COLOR.�.DO ;i . G . � �' ; v: ��ll113II1 i�U1LC.L.i:iim7y i �3IC' � _ _f ATPEST: �� t E i � � � ! 7eaaette Jones, . Deputy Co�y Clerk ' . , ; . �` • � -�� , � '- i y';� ',;:,. . �.,,,, .', _.;,: !�� _.:._ ,.--�--- �--�_..,. . . .- ____._.,_ ..._ ,.. .. - . 4. ,<. . .,.. .. ,...., . -:._: f ; /. _ _ � - 0 , t -. - � . � _ I:. � . . , . . _ ----_—_--, - _._..—_._ ___ � ��,,. �..; - ---- , j� ='' �---- ^ ,... w � - - �'��`: `•��:.; APPROVED JANUARY 14,1998 �/�`-;. � ti,,, j MINUTES . PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS t; �' ` j'�;; - ;� ,'i: '` SPECIAL MEETING °•. . i#:.,Y.�'. �Redstone Inn) OCTOBER 29, 1997 . CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chai�person Lamont calted the Special Meeting of the Board of Counry Commissioners to order at 6.20 PM at the Redstone Inn. �r � COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT:Commissioner I.eslie Lamont,Commissioner Mick Ireland ��' � and Commissioner Shellie Roy Harper. � � COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissione�Dorothea Farris and Commissioner Bill Tuite. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING-ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND 1;;::;: USE CODE SECTION 3-60-.40,SCENIC OVERLAY TO INCLUDE AREAS ALOI�IG STATE HIGHWAY 133 ADJACENT TO REDSTONE AND ADOPTING THE • � REbSTONE SCENIC OVERLAY MAP-MOTION TO APPROVE-Suzanne Wolff,Staff Planner,made her presentation as referenced in her agenda summary to the Board dated October 29,1997. A copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of ihis record as EXHIBIT"A". , Vice-Chairperson Lamont opened the hearing to public comment. Mr.Peter Martin asked if the whole Redstone Boutevard was within the Scenic Overlay. Ms.Wolff said no,it was not. � i ' Mr.Dan Baxter with the Redstone Inn,wanted to know if a parcel is in the scenic overlay, but paR of the parcel proposed for devetopment is not visible from the highway,is that exempt? In other ; words,can part of a parcel be subject to and part of it not subject to? Ms.Wolff said yes. � I . Vice-Chairperson Lamont closed the public hearing and brought the matter back to the Board for a motion. j� , Commissioner Ireland�vanted to make sure questions raised on July 16,1997,when the Board was here in � Radstone,have all been answered to everyone's satisfacuon. There was a question about the Redstone Castle bubble. t` ;, . �4' : ',. BOAItD OF COUIVTY COMMISSIONERS I SPECIAL MEETIlVG OCTOBER 29,1997 i � " ; : , I`„ _ _ _._ .... � _. � _ _ _ ._. ._ _r ._ , i } � • �I' ,. v .. � +`j�. � : ' , :I, s '",. . – — - __ _— -----� _ _. .._-__ , . �"+�+�---- . qM' ':� = « • ^ T�4 t {,.�y�� '�_ . 'YEa..�,��. Ms.Wolff responded by saying the whole property is now within the Scenic Overlay. p:.';r�`L'�;` Commissioner Ireland had another question:aised by Mr.Sid Long as to whether this affected signs. No it !'? ' jdoes not,there are sepazate sign regulalions so this has been straightened out. �,.'�� ' �+•'��`"r,'. � Commissioner Harper moved to approve the Ordinance and adopt the Redstone Scenic Overlay 1 � -'� ; Map. Commissioner Treland seconded the motion. Morion passed unanimousiy. Commissioner t - ' Tuite and Commissioner Farris absent. I•;�.� I �;.::' �. i j-;�.�:.'.;''. � ADJOLTRNMENT: ,�:��1� •; ,�::.�,.: The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 PM. � Following adjoumment,an open discussion and update on isses of community interest were he[d. Among � those staffmembers present were Temple Glassier,County Project Manager,Brian pettet from Road and Bridge,Debbie Quinn from the County Attomey's Office, Amy Guthrie,Historic Preservation Officer, Suzanne Wolff and Cindy Houben from Community Devefopment and Tom New[and,Assistant County �77 Manager. ; t Three members of the Redstoae Water and Sanitation Department voiced their concems abont the Board �•�' declinin their r uest for a$50,000.00 rant for a 601 stud . It was � g e4 g y agreed that they would meet with the Board of County Commissioners during a work session to be scheduled someUme in November. . i . t i [ ;� �; . ._ .---_-� . � J yl t � ., F �. � ;. �4�-� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2 SPECW,MEETING OCTOBE$29,1997 I :' ' --.__ _ _-------___ . _._ . .____., i _.._.__ ....._.. - ..,.._.. .__ '- _.. ._ .. .:...... _ ,.w� . i ' . E� 9 �? �� . , ..�:i:i.�..�. ' � . ' . "" .. ti� h. �. 1 . _ . � .. ..— � . . r�. ,',• " . ' ' • . .' . �,�,.�--_—�---- __.__._..__ .—__._. __". ___._�__��., i�� -�"y . . . vtvx' .... .,�. � � , ,.,. ----,� — ... rv�. .. .v:r'.�,wrri!f+�9+f!F,ktR�:�!:i k s��IT`k�"tc�itL��ah��k'�'�� e . v.4 • . � '�'. . r t..�� S_.�' � •'��{. y� i,. ' i��tc' -�; . '5,,. - . ';r.+'' �:.r .4.. . . Res ectfull submitted, ! p ,,� �,�� 1 � / (_I,ynd (R.Dean 3'.�'" ' � Deputy Clerk to d of Counry Commissioners k�'� � . i � i'�;� . �^ •.., i ��t1:,. : � Bill �rman ;��",o Board of County Commissioners °+?�. '-A�'�' ;�y �.�'1': �'JC. 1b ..1 �� J a ,I� I � i s � __� ' i 3 S � • . .{ . � y�� ( ! submitted for approva101-14-98 ? pcjmj/ww/g/minutes/1997/102997_2.doc � � �� ,.. � � �'- 1 � r �. � BOARD OF COUNTY COD9VIISSIONERS 3 SPECIAL MEETING OCPOBER 29,1997 'S"� i i.•'- � :.�'.'> ::�.,,.,.{:. � j=;��:r,:�.:�. � �_ .. . ._ .---..._... _ _.., .. . _ . .:..,...�..... ........_...... . :---..._._. . . .___._ .., _....__,----._. . ��}. __ _-_ : ....:.,_ ...:_�_....: ._._'--: 1 ._..._.:. . A .. �. � � , t . � � . 5 � A.j�:;.,_�.. ' . . . . t .: , `� � •: .. I _ _ , � .. . . ,` ,. . ... . . I�� . � _. l � . . � � �c.. . ' '. • . � . .. , I . . . . . . . . , . . � , r . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .__. .__.._---� ''�• � rT.�+�-----•r----•.. --.._.,.-_____ . —.—.—_" � ;�� ,--�=�. . . . .._ .. - ; ./' � �,��,��`'», ,� , ~ a �d�1�'' ��;��-��.,.� 1,� . }s-•�.. AGENDA TTEM SUMMARY �i:�_k�='�`�; ,.. � TO: Boud of Counry Commissioners , - ^ Special Meeting-October 29,1997 • �'� 'THRU: Cindy Houben,Community Development DirectorL�� +r.��-�'. �» .. �;:'� FROM: Suzanne WoIff,Planner ' ' , I I'c,.": ,. RE: Redstone Scenic Overlay-Text Amendment;Second Reading and Public Heazing ;�� ` . r ,r. .. � �.._. l,. . SUMMARY: The Board considered the proposed text amendment at a special meeting on Iune 23.1997, �'' '' ' at which time the first reading and public hearing was continued to allow staff to provide additional I , � _ background on the Redstone Master Plan and other issues raised during the hearing. After additionat ', •_ discussion,the Ordinance was approved on first reading on July I6. �" t ::; ISSUES: , . �: Boundarv of Scenic Overlav: The ori¢inal map presented to the Board designated the scenic overlay '��r boundary based on physical feamres.such as the east bank oFthe Crystal River and the toe of the slope to ;�� the east of the highway. The scenic overlay regulations are applicable to"Development on any parcel of r land which fa11s within or is crossed by the 5cenic Overiay",and,therefore,would be applicable even if the �'! proposed development is located outside of the scenic overlay boundary shown on the map. vlappin�the ;� overlay areas based on physical features is consistent with the overlay mapping for other areas of the County,however,this mapping�vas done before staff had access to the more sophisticated mapping technology that we now have with the GIS system. To make it cleaz that the regulations apply to I development anywhere on the parcel.the Board suggested that the boundary be drawn along the property j lines of those properties within the overtay area. The regulations woufd app{y the same under either mapping scenario: when development is proposed on a parcel within the overlay area,staff will determine i based on a site specific review whether the development is exempt from the regulations,requires an administrative�eview,or requires review by the Pfanning Commission. Staff will present maps at the meeting that depict the two potential boundaries. Staff agrees with the Boazd that using property lines to delineate ihe boundary is rnore clear.based on the current laneuage ofthe Code. � Some communities are currently usin�3D modelling to designate areaz subject to scenic review. These models allow much more specificity in defining what is visible,and,therefore,subject to review. The Community Development Deputment is starting to work with this technology,and may be able to refine the mapping of all of the scenic overlay azeas in the future to be more specific. RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to the recommendations of the Redstone Master P{an,staff and the y Planning Commission recommend that the Board approve the proposed text amendment to apply the scenic � • 'overlay regulations to certain areas along State Highway 133 adjacent to Redstone as stated in the attached , c Qrdinance,and that the Boazd adopt the proposed Scenic overlay map for this area. 'i �� . �[S , • � ` ` �.. � �- � ��• �_. ; �.� ..-. ; ' � � � t � . r: v .�. -a � . � ' N . � _ ..... ..' �— . . ' s.�I � , �'�' : .. . -- . ..-, . ...•.� _,..��.,...:�: ��.��.. ,;.._ ..,,:t'.�r�c .;r.:�_ .,- � . r.��.:f a� �4µ.1 �� . �� if�l��.i�.. 5�� f...'�,'-Si�e:� �.. BOX E Aspen,Colorado ,'!�� `.":�' � PROOF OF PU$LTCATION � . � � � STATE OF COLORADO) i . )ss. Copy of Notice ' �: ;-_ { � .�:.: j County of Pitkin ) � j� �-_ j � . • i,:-; . . � : iI,Andy Stone,do solemnly sweaz that I am the Editor � ' in Chief of Tf-lE ASPEN TT�tES:that the same is a weekly ' i newspaPer Print�d,.in,whoIe or in par�and published in 4 ithe CountSr of Piticin,State of CoIomdo,and has a geaeral _ ' f rirculation therein;that said newspaper has been pub- rusucriorice '� Iished continuously and tuunte�ruPtedlj,i�said County rsi:ncusr�ne sceav�c oveauY�one . ? of Pitkin,For a period of more than fifty-two mnsecuave ""1�'D'47°-�COND�"� : ; weeks next prior to the first pubfication oE the annexed NoT�ce is xeResv crven in,�.a P�nu� nvaas wm n�nde mw�naa:yi oaoua�z9. � 1997 at a epetW meNbg!o begln a[6:00 pm IegaI notice or advextisement;that said newspaper has �ao«m�eo,m e�c�ty co�miumM..u � been aduutted to the United States maiLs as second class �he Churth,�R�a.�o�<<a�o�.�a�..n matter under the provisions oE the Act of March 3,1879, +°'�''a„�ne eo s�uma'a.suwo�o�AOma�, ai.�,R+,�o�e se,u wqn,y�a�+el:�e".: °r az'Y��ents thereof,and thatsaid new a io a�a.ee�� nm��na s«�i�o„�.i.r - SP Per is a rce�+ew�a.��eommuxxn br Me Aees�one i a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing 1ega1 M.�c�.Plan.For luriher Inlormatlon or to i ` noaees and advertis RWew�map o�lhe proposed overAy�m E ements with the meazung of the taws contaet Su:anx Wo7R a�eM bpenJPllkln of the Slate of Colorado. c�mm��y o�•��oom�m o�w.im�i�s�o� azoswa cov��,a uk v��a aau�.nc�.R i �: alNble/w publk lnapectbn dutlng itgular�- 11ut the annexed legal notice or advertisement was u� buslnem houn In tde O/Ilce ol�he Ckrlc and Aecordv,57D Fut Maln StreU bpen,Colorado ` tished in the P 81611.Phau(97�9205180 regular and entire issue of ev number of ��«��a,n�u��rc�tycwk ��I i said weeidy newspaper for the eriod of�consecu_ 're'nh"°rne` P e adc�„tyco,a„wi��„ i t� tive insextions;and that the first publication of said notice `�b1a��"�"�^•a^TN^ns�:2r,�ss'+. : � '� wa in [he issue of said newspaper dated �.•. ��a�- A.D.,19�_ and that the lastpuir � `!lication o said nokce was in the issue of said newspaper � ;'dated A.D.,19�. ± � I` b '—� I '; � - � i � �iSubscribe and swom ta before me, a notary � ��pubGc in for the C oE Pitkin,State of Calorado, ��°R��`�_day of A.D.,I9�_, . ? p • f .. i Notary Public ' � My commission expires q-S-q S' " � ti '!' � 4 ��, � / �� !1 G '+�j, � __ ��; U — j' � I i � ; _ _ r a �. �. � � .. Lj"� _ . - j ' � .. .�.. � . __.__ _ --_._.._.. _._ �_ _ _ . _. _ __ _ . -- ._ . __ _... ..._. � i , ` �' ,. -• - . . . . - - . r1 � : ' 1: � .. • . ' . .� . / . "K, . ,.--�.- ._.. .._.'_ ._'"' — ..._._"' _"_ ...___'____....__.-� . � d^"�T � , 1 u,�Y