HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.min.reg.02021993 w "
� '� ,� �.�.l .J .. p; '!:!j . i/.`• ' '::I `��� �;�3�' i��.-4� a ` ` ^r .'�i Syt.::
.1�! ! ,�P M j � � ��� kt�YIt �l� V �tYl.� `. yl• 'j � ,1' f C'.
�.{. . . .. t' i 4t +y•1 �, �.� i,';
` � i��,,.�;� , .y�':n ���>>.�,�5�( �",''�6 3��
,«�y'."r�6K ..� ,�. _ �..a�:�..:�+�'` °Y� . . ... i.
. la::a �.L4�Fi.bY.. � ��.
.��Y.i
�> >
�d
'- - PITISIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ��"
AGENDA ���''
j TUESDAY. FEBRUARY 2. 1993
i ROR1C BESSIOH -Bheriff�s Office Coaferanae Room y
10:00 AM SPECIAL MEETING - ABATEMENT HEARING - Carol Foote �' � '
10:15 ADJOURN SPECIAL MEETING j:r
I0:15 1. Cancellation of Certificates over 5 years old, Carol
Foote
1Q:30 2. Rural and Remote Policy, Cindy Houben
� 11:30 3. Code Interpretation, Gideon Kaufman
t�
�I 12:00 LUNCH BREAK
i
1:30 PM COUNTY MANAGER�S REPORT
4. Droste Water Issues, Ellen Sassano (30 minutes) j �
5. Return of State Mandate, Reid Haughey (15 minutes) � .
6. Use Tax Projects for 1993, Stan Berryman (30 !
minutes) �
, 2:45 AATOURN �
4:00 7. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH CZTY COUNCIL �
AACP Endorsement, Cindy Houben
� 4:30 PM SPECIAL MEETING - EXECUTIVE SESSION i
Water Issues
5:00 AATOURN SPECIAL MEETZNG s
� ��F� ; ,
RSGDLAR ?lESTING !�(3ENDA - Distriat Courtroom i •.
5:00 PM PUBLIC COMMENT
CONSENT AGENDA ��
1. Previous Meetings Minutes, 9/15, 12/14, 12/15 & 12/22/93 �
2. CSU Memorandum of understanding, Reid Haughey �-
3. Cancellation of Certificates Over 5 Years Old, Carol I `
-- -"";; Foote �.
� Board Appointment Resolution, Reid Haughey �,
�?'?1 4. ACRA Guest Services Contract, Scott Smith �
' � 5. Ambulance Licenses, C.G. Rounsefe2l :
��� ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC HEARINGS %�
6. Fee Ordinance, Reid Haughey ��
I LAND USS PUBLZC HEARINGS "'
�;�
7. Richards Caretaker Dwelling Unit, Mary Lackner �'` �
8. Basalt & Rural Fire District Rezoning, Tim Malloy
9. Frey Caretaker Dwelling Unit, Ellen Sassano !
10. Elam Construction Sand & Gravel Pit Annual Review, Ellen
sassano 'µ"'
!
� 9:00 PM ADJOURN
i
��
;.
i
i �
F.
� � ...._...._ .....
. ..... . .. ............ . .. . .. . ........... .. ..... .........._. ._.... ' '��'�
4 ,. } �
. , ...`,: �'.
1 � � . . � • , - �
• , i
.. • !
��a7 ' '
,��,�;.. . ' •
t,:�.:
a�
�
.�� .
�. � l�. '� � ��:,�t ..,.. .ri_ i.� i . : �.:. .,.
. �.�f�rn � . , � �Ix4� i 1/ � ��1�• ! e\��i4 :. i� .,r at'.
. , i� lt1 ti y ��t �h,?P.� �etj}'�'
. �. � .�. ' � -.�Sf �Y_�,r"��'� .�bd!r� t.. . A ' 7F;r
: ,�? � ;. f tih. . '���� '�.. . � ���.. .�tl:$._ . . .-1,���.
,�`� {�'L�`.
�•�
��/�/,'OU� `:
r '
_ -- - �-9-�r 3 r:'�:
�'��
liIH[TTES
; PITRIN CO[fNTY 80ARD OF COUNTY COMMISBIONSRB ,� f
I
1 REGOLAR MEETING
�
i FEHRIIARY 2. 1993
� CaLL TO ORDSR: Chairman Tuite called the meeting to order at 5:35 �
p.m. �:
COlQtI88iON 1�MHBRB PREBENT: Commissioners Bill Tuite, Fred ``ti"�
Crowley, Wayne Ethridge, Jim True and Bob Child •
Jim Collins, representing the Woody Creek Caucus appeared before
the Soard to present a plan for the Pitkin Iron Employee Housing i
, Site. A copy of his presentation is made a part of this record as
- EXHIBIT n]1��. �q
i
Mr. Collins was advised that staff will do an analysis of the plan �
and get back with the caucus as soon as possible. � -
i There being no further public comment, Tuite closed the public � .
� comment portion of the meeting.
� i
:4� CONBENT AGENDA•
�'
RE]►PPR04AL OF MINIITEB OF SEPTEMBER 15 1992 APPROVAL OF lIINOT88
OF DECEMBER 1�. DSCBMBER 15 AND DECEMHER 22. 1992 �
� ;:
APPROV7IL OF MEMORANDO![ OF UNDERBTANDING RITB COLORADO STATE
UNIVERSITY - ..
- ' RSSOLOTIQN 7►MENDZNl3 RE60LIITION 93-12 At7D APPOINTZN(i REPREBENTATIVEB
`�°: TO YARIOUB Hf�11RD8, COM!lITTEES ]1ND ADTHORITIEB - Reid Haughey,
County Manager, stated that this resolution amends Resolution No. �
�, 93-12 to include the appointment of Bob Child to the Transportation
Oversight Group and the Parks Association. �i,(
4:�;
71PPROVAL OF C�NTRACT WITH ASPBN CHAMBER RESORT ABSOCIATION FOR '' ''-.
GUEST SERVICES AT AIRPORT �' '
�;
' f APPROVI►L OF 71MSIILANCE LIC8NSE8
�_ �i.
Commisaioner Sthridge moved approval of the Coasent 7lqenda. 1Pith
� a secoad by Commissioner Croirley, the motion pasaed unanimously. ' ?
't
BECOND READIN(3 ORDINANCE ESTAHLI8HING FEES FOR T$S PLANNING AND p':',
E'�,,
HOARD OF COIINTY COMMI88IONERB 1 FEBRIIARY 2� 1943
�
� .i � - 1��.-
. . ........_.... ., . :.. ... .. . .
., . . .. .... ... . ..._ .... . .. . . . . ._ ������ Y .
� � + ,. ' �; . .
� • .
� `
. .� �;:
^ti;l . . .
�.:K:. . . . .
{}�� • �
L�`' -
,� . �� .. ._� aS �'.
i r `�-
'� r '.�� .� .. � . , .. �,.��' +�'! �� r�te�1� + B�.
�;,� - �r.f , a •o �,�;
, ! 1�.k' . .. y�;-!n i>s ,��5'. �+�V4(.,*t..A�' ,�r�� ~�lt. �� 7.
� � ���-
� ���,� .,.. r_ ,. acTi;'�saA�'il�- fi.tiiY.t7�"����''.... �':�.�::+u . 'r �
' �l'1�'�'-�
) '
�3
- •f.J.%
- ' ZONINIi 11IiD CRIMIN!►L JIISTICE RECORDB DEPARTMENTB - MOTION TO APPROVB , .
- PABSED DNANIMOIISLY HaUghey said in the Board's packets for
second reading is the Fee Ordinance that has been proposed. This
ordinance amends the existing fee structure for the County to allow
for a 3/12 percent increase on those items that are mentioned. (;: `
i There are two particular fees in the ordinance that are worthy of
i note. One is the addition of the land manaqement fee which was not
in existence. The Board had question as to whether there was an
j Amendment No. 1 impact as a result of that. It is the opinion of
the County Attorney's Office and also Tom Oken that there is not
an impact in adopting that fee. Under Amendment No. 1, the �
limitations that exist as a result of Amendment No. 1 are in the ;
�: aggregate as opposed to the specific fee that may be imposed. In •
addition, it is associated with an out going cost. �-,
Haughey said the second issue that has come up is whether or not
the zoning fee late fee is a fee for a fine. If in fact it is a
fine, it cannot be greater than $$300 however, it is set for $380
and he would suggest that the Ordinance be amended to set it back
at $300. �
� .
- Tuite opened the hearing to public comment. There being no �
comment, he closed the public hearing.
Commisaioner Etbridqe moved to approve the fee structure as amended '
reducinq the $380 $oainq fee or fiae to a maximum of $300. With i
ia aecoad by Commissioner True, the motion passed vnanimouely.
� � RE80LIITION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A CARSTARER DWELLING IINZT ON LOT
';��y I 12 HOLLAND HILLS SIIBDIVISION BUHMITTED SY E. ALDEN RICHARDB -
iMOTION TO TAHLE - PASSED UNANZMOIIBLY
l Commfasioner Ethridqe moved to table thia matter indefinitely due
; to the fact that the applicant was not present to discuas a
' poteatial water iasue. With a aecond by Commiasioner Crowley, the �
j motion passed unanimously.
,•, SECOND RSADING - ORDIN7�TCE GRANTIN(i REZONING FOR THE .37 ]1CRE
�"�� PARCEL DESCRIBED IN ��ESHIBIT 71�� FROM AF-1 TO POBLIC IN ORDBR TO
ACCOMlIODATE THE HASALT FIRE DIBTRICT BUBSTl1TION - MOTION TO APPROVE ; ';
�'� PA88ED UNANIMOIISLY �; '
Tim Malloy, representing the Planning Office, summarized this item `
as an application, submitted by the Basalt and Rural Fire �`
Protection District, for rezoning of a .37 acre parcel from AF-2
to Public. The subject property will accommodate a fire substation
for the Basalt and Rural Fire Protection District. ' "`
i ;;.
Malloy said the parcel was a part of a larger lot which was owned st
� I by the Crowley's called Lot 4 of the Crowley Subdivision, which is <�
l being separated for this purpose. ��
� ��,'
j HOARD OF CODNTY COMMISSIONSRS 2 FESRUARY 2, 1993 �i ,'
� �::. '
I ��.
� i ��ti•
� _ _
.
_. _._... .
._. . - 4 , ,.I,I,,
. _
� � �
. �
.��;'��, ..
s�';`„'' .
�
„�, � _
� .
,,,: , ' ' ;j';: , ``
�`}. r �-'�'I I :. -. . ” � f ' I `r -�;� . � a��� '��g,�,5 �4
.�.� r 4t•. I�l (i ;t' �` An �* ��,!
� .�:� . 7�t ':,.iil �'IS� .•.��Y' � ��, 44
. .. t`�'�..�4 .... .. .. q�ai�'.':rv.�h+l+'�. .aeiAt.: _e � w.�.'�,"!�ar"N..'. _ ,tF �,•�5'ik':
U.
16'�ti4'3
i,
;• �
�:1,:
�-�� Thomas Adkinson, representing the applicant, stated that he has no �. .��
; comments, but would be happy to answer any questions. '
�.
Ethridge asked Adkinson if they has made any progress regarding
� access to the Crowley Subdivision.
i Adkinson responded, that they have said all along, that they are
� glad to let them come through their property and the configuration
� is not an issue for them.
Malloy commented that when this property was discussed at the last
meeting, the Board preferred allowing access as proposed by the .
� Crowleys, at the rear of the lots and the concern was that allowing �
access through the Basalt and Rural Fire District parcel might }�ti ;
result in some problems with laying out the parking and impacts to i .
the grading. It was his understanding, that the preference was to �
simply allow them to access Frying Pan Road where they currently �
� proposed. �
• Tuite opened the hearing to public comment. There being no comment �
, he closed the public hearing. � '
Commissionei Bthridge moved approval of aecond readinq of the � .
ordinance qrantinq resoning for the Basalt and Rurai Fire i
i Protection Distriot for a nev facility ia the Frying Pan River �
valley. Nith a aecond by Commiasioaer Crowley, tbe motion pssaed
( unanimouely. `
� RESOLIITION GRANTIN(i FINAL APPROVAL FOR SUHDIVZ6ION E%EMPTION 11ND
'=4� BPBCI7IL REVIEf1 FOR THE .37 ACRE BASALT FIRE DISTRICT SUBSTl►TION - '
MOTION TO ]►PPROVB .
Commissioner Ethrdiqe moved approval of tha resoluiton. 1►ith a F �,
� aeconQ by Commiasioner Crowley, the motion passeQ unanimously. •
� :
RESOLIITION GRANTING APPROVAL TO THE FREY CARETAICER DNIT - MOTZON ,
TO aPPROVE - PASSED IIN7INIMOIIBLY- Malloy summarized this item as an
� application, submitted by Glenn Frey, to legalize a bandit unit �
. "i which was built in 1977 and was originally intended as a music
studio. Since 1977, it has been occupied as a caretaker dwelling ;
''� unit and essentially they want to legalize this unit. He said
there are only a couple of minor issues related to the application,
and the applicant has agreed to comply with all the recommended �...
conditions of approval.
i
Jane Ellen Hamilton, representing the applicant, stated that they
are willing to comply with all the recommended conditions of �? M�'
I approval. 3
; � '' =
� j True opened the hearing to public comment. There being no comment, ,{�,
I he closed the public hearing. ,. �p,
( ti:.
;..t.
� B071RD OF COONTY COMliI88IONERB 3 FEBRUARY 2� 1993 ' �
�
�
i
i
� �:.
:N
�..'. J
. � . ... _.... .._ .._,. . . _ . . ... .. . . . . . .
....... .....� . _ .... _ .
. ._.. . � . .. .. .
1.
� � '
1 •
r
,J;..�.A,'�." - . ., '
�'yt'�t, . . .�
f f�Z
nf,.
��: '
�'
'� ; a ,.. '�.: f e� +` '� : i
� '� j :� ` t ,r �� 3 .
� r .. ,�nv�' .
,J � .� i �J
' � �1 �' : yT t +I S y3�S,� .'�I6ai� ��!S� � ,'�n�� � ..L�
���� ,�'' d�j�S�� �, t � '� �s 1` t
' . -�i: ii� .. � S�'1. iF /�:�i� �' � ....�,R�� F ) ..'rY �.
�'_�'� y ��''t -r M1��_:. i�,}� � i:
. . . . . . .. .�.':`4S.�r
Commisaioner Crorley movea appronal of the applicatioa vfth the
recommended conditioae of approval. Witb a sacond by Commissioner '
True, tha motioa passed unanimously.
� R�..F80LDTION GRANTINfi ANNUAL RBVIEN APPROti►AL TO THS ELAM ciRAVEL PIT
SPECIAb REVIEN PSRIiIT - MOTION TO APPROVB - PASSED QNANIMOIISLY -
� Cindy Houben stated that Ellen Sassano did a thorough review of the �•
� Elam Sand and Grave2 Pit Special Review Permit. Last year when �"
there s ecial review ?
p permit was reviewed, there were several
conditions of approval that the Board wanted staff to follow
� ,; through on. The two conditions she would like to talk about
tonight is the revegetation work that is taking place and the
; participation between Elam and the County in that effort. She said
next year the plan is to do more hydro mulch on the property to
establish some more revegetation. Also, Woody Creek thihks that
, Elam has been doing a great jab, and did make a note of that. She
referred to memo from the Woody Creek Caucus with this regard. A i
copy of this memo is made a part of this record as EXHIBIT ��8��.
' . Houben said another issue regards the reconnection of the County
Rio Grande Trail. When the new road was put in place up to the
Elam Gravel Pit, the road cut was made through the trail.
Therefore, the trail has to be realigned, and that is the
responsibility of the County. Staff is working with Elam to try
to reestablish that trail.
! Ethridge referred to the width of the trail. He said he thinks it
' �,�F. i would be more appropriate that the trail conform to the standards �
`�. 1 that are being developed by the Open Space and Trails Committee.
�
I Bill Aerosmith stated, that they are willing to participate in the
trail. What he is concerned about is safety. Also, because they
don't know what is being constructed at this time, they don't know
what their participation will be.
-- --"a
Tuite opened the hearing to public comment. There being no
`;*�;:' comment, he closed the public hearinq.
�� Crowley commented that in 1988 the revegetation, road realignment
` � and the trail were the three issues outstanding, and those three
items are still being talked about five years later.
� After a short discussion, staff was asked to look into these items ( �
' and pursue getting them completed. �
Tuite asked the applicant if they have any problem with the �^"
conditions of approval. �;
� I Brooke Peterson, representing the applicant, and Dan Aerosmith both
agreed that they would comply with the conditions of approval.
Commissioner Ethridqe moved approval subject Yo the chaage in
BOARD OF COi1NTY COMMISSIONERS 4 FEBRUARY 2� 1993 ��
� d
i ;
f'
4
, .... ...... . . ..
.._.'�..:...�..�.� ._....,... . . . . . .. .. . .`. .. . . . . . ...
' � - . . '�..� ���':.
� . • ' ' ,
/ • �
fra�. . .
?"tE�= �"+ - -
:�tYI,
e�n.
,r . � , �{y�,L1��ty't,�., �»r�r\ :�.�> >`l�h t" `� ���f;y1'�3�ki r -���l�'.
l�� � �i �� .el �.����� 1�:r� .� �.� YH��' . r. �Y i i�'�,t�.,: �`�ur9S �.: r 1 i.. t i�, �u. .�a' f �.� 4i:
t � Yi:�t�''�`� 7� , . Ak t",. 4 �{ � /
E` Y �i�x��{r, < . F � , t f, ir
�a+�.�r. ! ;� ��± r��' �,.
wtr.: �.� .. . �1ili.. �8d i .. . f .
�{�� . '� ...y.* �Y� .-r,,,.��,�
' ' —.. '. . ��-�.'a�- . �_` . `n� i�� ��. t�i.-�i�� ` . . ..�'1G...
�`
'.. �.
.... ..__.__�'- . . i.
' aonditiona as previousip diacuased that the trail ahail comply with !
the ataadards as developed by the open Space and Trails committee. ,�:
with a ascond by Commisaioner Crowlsy, the motion paesed
unanimouslp.
]�DJOORNMEI�IT: Commiasioner CroMley moved to adjoura the meeting at %'
, 6s�5 p.m. with a seaond by Commissioner Chi13, the motion passeQ
una imously.
• .(; esp ctfully s i ted
�- I ����.(if/�
anette Jone
� Clerk to the oard of County Commissioners
� ��.. �
. � �. ,.
�t�,
. � (
i
,.I.�_,
�
'�30.�
� --
� !
;'.
�•
r.�
' HOARD OF COUNTY COMMI88IONERB 5 FEBRIIII&Y 2� 1993
�` j
i
. ..,
__ ___ _.,.,..,_�_._�..._...� ..____._.,r,:._.
. . . . ` �c.......+« �.....,..._-...� . -._.... .. �.u.�..-�....�n,.�1;•gd `->k42iFG
'� . . .. . � . �: ' � .. ' ��
` . .. ..• � .. � .. � . . � . . .
. .j . . . .. � . . . .. . � . . . . . . . . . , ' . . .
\ . �
� i
- . .. � . . . .. .. - . . . . . � . . � , ( , �
, � . . . , .. . . . . ' ' . . � . � , '
. . '.ti'\"�. .�:. . � _ . . � . . . ' ..
� '
� �
. �� r
�� ,
"''�� -:� ., �.,; 4 � Y r.. ,;a` �yr., � r � � i.:.S } ��+ � ,y4F;..
.�.�,,1 �n w't�r L . .. ' . n��, tc}.'ii i!� }'r sri�.. _',i ?�.,�"Z�w _�1y
»:'• . . � � . _ � t• !� - 4� y0 .._ < � - �,
r k,. rt.y7; �'t i y�i 4"16a�� ' ii
Lhe �v ,. �3i � k� ,t+�,,
, . . .l�o.�. ..c a .. �iGYrriti�'u; �'4id,������..i;.�.[,'�.`! c . �Y .��Y�4
, �/�/1�//' %'�" '� t;
i ml'� .cJy
i •
� , . LUk(t!�oF C0.C��,�4'P�S �;
_ F1TiSIN CO��ilIY
.. s• t 8ilfift!7 i'}:i];l�ii5 ' 'Z�r
r�;�t�: i
oatc:._�--=--�-S 3'_--- � . ,.
Suh;v�•i:.�/'�`�vsc7i C�%"'�".0 .
„ 'f ^ �' ,.
, ,:.,. .__.�-A._----�-... �
k�.'.
I
� . � t�Fttt+t+t�F+tt+}tttttt�Ft�Ft+tt++i��F+t+t++t4�F+t�F++t++�Ff�tttt+4++++t++4t+ttttt c�:.�.'.
E:�
WOODY CREEK DISTRICT PLANNING COMMISSION �'
P.O.BOX 299 f
WOODY CREEK,CO 81656 February 2,1993 �
�� ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ p
I t "
I � •
I
� rl !
The Woody Creek Caucus and The Woody Creek District Planning Commission would like to enter ,
! into a Creative Alliance Partnership with The Pitkin County Commissioners to create a plan which 1
� is favorable to all parties concemed regarding the Pitkin Iron Site owned by Pitkin County. �
. �
The issues are:DENSITY,ECONOMICS and THE PL4NNING PROCESS. y. .
;-
t. DENSIIY E
MAXIMUM DENSITY=3 Free market units between the Roaring Fork River and Rive�Road.
. Each free market unit carries the right to develop i employee unit `� ;
giving an additional3 employee units to the Pitkin Iron Site. � -
z.•�
� ��� MAXlMUM DENSITY=6 Employee Units between the Roaring Fork River and Hwy 82. i �
� '�
A. ZONING=The Pitkin Iron property is 38+totat acres. 21 acres behveen the
Roaring Fork River and Hwy 82 and 17 acres between the Roaring Fork 'i
River and Hwy 82. �•
' 1. A�1 Zoning also applies,which allows 2 units unless a variance can be ��:
--- found to eliminate the slope reducYion tactors WITHOUT REZONING.
_ ii,
2. The 2+acre fevef site between the river and HWY 82 could be rezoned PMH G;;
" and RESTRICTEDto 6 residential units under Pitkin CountyAffordable
� Housing Guidelines. �' '
. . j� � :
� B. SITE REDUC710N/SLOPE REOUCTION=shows a net 22 developable acres on � '
the entire Pitkin Iron Site. r' �y
� II. ECONONIICS=the Pitkin Iron Parcel was purchased for$1,300,000. �th proper
j planning,we project 3 well designed Free—market lots with river frontage which `; ;,�:,
� could sell for$500,000.each. This would result in the county recouping their ;i
entire investment while retaining ownershtp of 2he PMH Sife. 7his makes the �
� + subsidy provided by the county to low income housing at virtualiy no cost to the -`{
community. � ,
� This also replenishes 100%of the funds originally spent on the purchase of '
Pitkin tron to fund other projects. ���r..
�� .�
/ 7 ��
��',
i ��>r-
� _.-..�<..:._:�.____ ._ . -
_.., __._. _ _. . ... ..._,. __._._ _..._..
,. •
. _ ` . . `, '- ... _ .... , ,."-��Kt�� _
{�i '.,
�
l . • .
. /
���� • �
.�R^."`.�T'• � � .
�`�'
�
1�yF,� • ��.�. . • .
� tY n'.' '�'1 i� i:Ta '�+.i . t' i�'�l � "Ia � ,.
C S�,aM.4�. a . ':9E _� �'J'J ■ �,�� k�� :1J i 9 i•:�
��,�.�•�i+�; . . F: ,., r) t ���:fi. �U� �(i. -ri•,, �.�4.� t, .'�ti
'yJ,� " 1f�. .����.a'S�"�� `+�l ?.. � � 't'
- " �-4'•'�.. . �f.'� y�}li, w 1 li�
��..Y.�1Z V.Y�
M�
; '.�L.i.`.: . . . '
� � JJW 1 319:;3 ,
� ` :
t • T'WE�WOOC]V �RE�,�c cAlJC�u�� �i.:
- _ . Post Oftice Box 299, Woody Creek, Co)orado �,qiss�s ,..-- .--,'l
.
Tp; Pi#kin Caunty Commissioners and P7ann9nq Staff� E11an 3aaaano
FRaM: Oistrict Planninq Commissian of the Woody Greak Caucua
RF: E1am Annua7 Review , • �
�, l
� pATE: January 12, 18fl3 '
-� *-*_*_*-*_*_*-*_*..�k-*,*-�k-*..*..�_�_*_* .
� r• The Planning Commission of the Woody Creak Caucus has •reviewed
the submission by tho Elam t3�ave1 Pit operators for their requ9red
annual ravlaw of their Speclal Uso Permit.
We havv no objectlo�s to the documon#s io they have baen
presented ta•us.
• '' f In addition,. in keepinq with our long atandiny tradition of
����;, ` I' plaaing credlt or b7ame where #hey are dus, we would 79ka to
express ou� appreoiatfon to E1am and Bil'! Arrasmith for their
efforts toward decreasing the mapM tude of the impacta .on tha
_ ' Woody Creek community.
r
�-��;ti ,,� `�� For The Woody Creak Dietrict Planninp Commisaion:
._,.; , .
.`t � Jame9 Collins ^
,
• Bob Sterling
• Jane Oinsmoor
:< , ` . . BOARO OP CQ.CG,.,M'R'S
� o(Ti:iN Ct3tJ,;��
• PuUli�Hcarin�cz�,c��:`s
.Date:___-�-:-�-�3 .______-.
Sub�e;:t:��'--�-...____
� /�
r-<h fUa. _�---.-..._...._
� .
� ��� � � � .
_... .... ... .......�..__
, •- ._. .__ ..__..�_.
,
. • � ,I _.. .... _... �.��� -
�, , • .
� , • -
. , �
;:�:"�:' , ,
{ '�,�, . .
�
,.f. ' � "
7�
I�Ai.
��'� { ' . ._ '
,`� ri: � � 'tyf t -1.r> 'r. �. - A��.P' ��µ '`��ix�c "!•'S�r ���f�; a� ri �y �,��t � �':f�.��:
P , t q, v fs .L�. v r �:�.�.
�1. .� . � T. .. ('w ,�i 't .r n' ;.''
. � • j y . 'pWra "��1��'�' .� ?ii
�
. . ��'� •d. r., _4��ty. .m �y..�4 � ,..�u: . . ..;.ib�rt i:n��, . . .. i� ��
�/�/9l/' 's�!" k,��.t.
. l�
� �-� -/`� , L'OHS?U U"r CQ.�Qt.i7t5'R'S �:�,;�.
_ f!1ii!lN L'L)lSirll' 'i; }
. . 4'ttt:ii�NCt;4lfiil i1>:!f`�C�i'�S ��.:�:
; ou��:_._�---�"y 3 S �; �
I :ut;..i,•..l�/*�VdGi"t ca�;Mc�'r � .:
� �� i
. . ..:.,. ._.._._�A---------
+++++++++++++++++�.++++++t++++++++++++++++++++++++++++��+++++++++++++++++
I WOODY CREEK DISTRICT PLANNlNG COMMISSION "
( P.O.BOX 299
WOODY CREEK,CO 81656 February 2,1993 �`:
+ti�tti�til�ti�t++++t+t+i��F+ttttt+tt+i�++ttti�+ti�i�i�tt+t++t+++t�F+fi t+t+4t++�h+tttt
� �`� ,.
� � ,
; .
t
7he Woody Creek Caucus and The Woody Creek District Planning Cammission wouid like to enier
' into a CreativeAtliance Partnership wlth The Pitkin County Commissioners to create a plan which
. � is favorabte to all parties concerned regarding the Pitkin Iron Site owned by Pitkin County.
The issues are:DENSITY,ECONOMICS and THE PLANNING PROCESS. j -
I. DENSITY 4
MAXIMUM DENSITY=3 Free market units between the Roaring Fork River and River Road.
. Each free market unit carries the right to develop 1 employee unit
giving an additional3 employee units to the Pitkin Iron Site. `
3'
�t,,�`� MAXIMUM DENStTY=6 Employee Units between the Roaring Fork River and Hwy 82. �
�
. A. ZONING=The Pitkin Iron property is 38+total acres. 21 acres between the �
Roaring Fork River and Hwy 82 and 17 acres between the Roaring Fork � "
River and Hwy 82. 1'
-. � :., .
J � ' 1. AF1 Zoning also applies,which ailows 2 units unless a variance can be Y �
'� found to eliminate the slope reduction factors WITHOUT REZONING. � '
_ 'c r;. .
'"'. 2. The 2+acre level site between the river and HWY 82 could be rezoned PMH ii '
`` _ and RESTRtCTED to 6 residentiat units under Pitkin CountyAffordable "
� . Housing Guidelines. � �
u,i
; +
; 8. SI7E REDUCTION/SLOPE REDUCTION=shows a net 22 developab(e acres on � .,;
the entire Pitkin Iron Site. ��
�. ',
• i:
IL ECONOKAICS=The Pitkin Iron Parcel was purchased for St,300,000. With proper i;
' planning,we project 3 well designed Free-market lots with river frontage which
� could sell for$500,000.each. This would result in the county recouping their. y 'w'+
� entire investment while retaining ownership of the PMH Site. This makes the �
� ' subsidy provided by the county to low income housing at virtually no cost to the F'� �
� community. ��
This also replenishes 1004b of the funds originaily spent on the purchase of `�i�;
Pitkin Iron to fund other projects. ;��1�
; �.
\i : �
, + :.•.
„':.
�
.._..-.�..,�.....,��..___.._ . _....__ .. ... . . .._._. _._.._ . .
,._ . . _....._ - :�s��
4 . . . �
, r <.r ''-
� ' • � � :
�
!
:�:�' •
��::;�` . � '
.�,'-.
K
l� .i�ry.. � �e. � . f
�r V , � „� ,�� �6'�-�' t. l �.�f 5 a� -t )t�(�R�.l t�h i �C,�'�l�r �t...i�...
i 1 -»_to�a�r.�.. �.s. ti',n: .s >�.f ;�r s ;i. r'Nj�,s,��1 t 4 r� ,�N+ti��
�: . . . .«:.n.. W .. -'�. �:;�..�.1,�:x:iLt+��� '.�.�y�:3�cS.�.aJ.�..;;c:..ar
:.1� YA
��
• t S\
!
� �1 �
.. _""__ ._ i 'd �
� �•.r
lII. PIANNING PROCESS +
�`�r'.
A. The Woody Creek Caucus and the Woody Creek District Plartning Commission will � ,i'
assist Pltkin County in developing a suitable design for this,proJect.
� 4., :=
8. Among the things that we want to accompl3sh are: F�:'::
1. limii impact on sites across the river from each other. }�
- 2. Deed Restrict t���•
3. Design suifabie buiiding envelopes.
� �' 4. Maintain existing zoning on the.River Road. �
The Woody Creek Caucus requires final approval of this joint pian developed by the Woody Creek �
District.Planoing Commission and the Pitkin County Commissioners an the Pitkin Iron Site.
i
! C i
� Background Intormat3on: j
� __... fro m�C[�E WGG t�Y--GP.k��__l�-t��.12. �?!� � '
E. Employee Housing: --'----. �•
; . !
1. Woody Creek• is proud to currently devote an +
exceptionaily large percentage of its housing '
stack to low and moderate income housing. No . �
(� ' additional high density or high rate employee �:
'L�. � housing deveiopments shall be permitted. Further
~�` ' empioyee housirtg wi71 continue to be provided f
`• in scattered 1ow density housing patterns. _"
i
F. No new high density deve]opments in Woody Creek:
--- - 1. Maintaining the population status quo is cr�tical �
�'=;,s<�� to the residents of Woody Creek. No cfianges in �;
•\
"?^'-== zoning which increase density shall be permitted.
�� 2. The "cluster residentiai" designation on the Down ' k
VaTTey Comprehensive Plan land use map (page 101)
i and the description of "cTus'ter residantial use" in
the text (page �O6) wili be deleted from the Down
Valley Comprehensive P1an and the "rural I
residential" designatian sha71 be retained to cover i�`
. the Pitkin Iron property which shall mairttain its �
' existing zoning (AF1}, ' '
. � Sr:
� _ �
`�.__.� _ _.. . — �.'
.
.
:Intent _ _ ... � �
Crea�t�a housing eavironment which is dispersesed,appropriately sCaled to the neighborhoods ";,;p;;,;,,r�„�,,,,,;rP,,,, "
andaffordable. ' • A""0"^'°� �
. Pap�21
�
, '..�«_._,�... ..—_..__,.- ..__.`.___.____._._ . . .
._....._.._. .... ..
. . � . .. � . , ---.�___..J....»_._�_.__. ��n.j a..�.�:._.
. � � . ` ' . , � �
. ' .. . . (. ,.' � .
� � � ' � � ' ' � .
� r
�_l�l. ,
��.
-;`�
(�':�Y' � � • . . , .
;�,
e�ti
7F i
t'�4 ; 'r 5 h � a� - •. y , ;.:7 � �4:7:; -; i�� . ��,� �y��''. �'1 ' 4 � ��.���!< � . � � i�.
�L .�v:Jl2trtrty�� � �.• � � r dl.-� . t :' .ti��,` �'Al�F w.��ti�y.� :"�C y��y�:w 4�-�l.a _.
. R� �'� y .�������o ..'"�t, 'f r �Y�.
. . � .. ' .� .,1aL. d .. . . ._� .��ii.� �4 !1
� 7 L.f ti,. � � "t�
, ;�..._...
,�.. ��
. i F...
� �'�► .lIW 1 319�:i ,. ;��
. TWE WOC]C7Y CREEK CAUCU�3� ��•: ii �
-- '} �� Post Off�ce Box 298, Woody Creek, Colarado,�A1R��---- ---,^l (� I�i
( • I.` .rs
i
-. �;
+ T0: Pitkin County Commissioners and Planninq Staff� E11an Sassano i `
1
FROM: Diatr4ct Plannin Commission of the Woody Creek Cauaus '''rv'•-��'`
q f`..:.•:.: .
'',.;_,•:,
,,��.
' RE: E1 am Annua7 RQVi ew . ' ' �,'..�'.,
j f:
pATE: January 12, 79�3 �
: �..;
#-,�_*_*-*-*-*-w_*-*-*_*-*-*_*-*_*_y,_w .
�
' ( The Planning Comm�ssion af the Woody Creek Caucus haa •reviewed
� � the submission by the Elam G�ave1 Pit operators for thelr required
Il
- I annual revlow of their Special Usa Permit. •
We hava nq objections to the docum�nts a� they have boen E� .
� -
presented to�us. �,y
In addition,. in keeping with our long atandin� tradition of �
��,� placing credit or blame where tt►ey are dus, we would 19ko to � �
. express our appreciation to E1am ahd Bill Arrasmfth for their � .
' efforts toward decreasing the maAnitude of the impacts .on tho
�y •. .
Woedy Creek community. `
For The Woody Creek District Planniny Comm9saion:
��
Jamea Collins
��' • Bob Ster7 i ng `,'4
:, �J
, Jane p9namoor
' ' ,`�r
' BOARo 7Y.IN C(?U�+?"11 R S ;
� i
PuLfc Hcarinn r��� �� 1
� ' ,_,�_�'y� 3� -- !�: ���
.Dste: -/ T"_ , i'1
� JUUjL�t•.�^.'.-_"'." ........___.. . fi:.�I.}�.,
I �+(� j� 1 .
P<h.N0. ___-^�----...__..,_.
i
• S;;i.;,..
.��::;'
. � . • � 'i43:
. . - '/";;;,'-
� � . . _<a�'.
, . _.�,.-�.�.:i_�v..,...-.._.._�.,_ . .
...,.._..: , �.. .,.
... . , , _....., .:.:. .. .
, ..�:. ... .:..: . ,__ ._._ .:....._..._.
. .�. .. � • � l. . ..... . .... . _ . ,,_ ��;ls
. ' � .� f . . . . . . .
\ ' , '
. / . . . . . � � - .
� .��q�' • � •
.rnrt. .
��� rY. _
�..f.; . . . .
���
i'�K