The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.min.reg.04131993 � ,:- ,,�. ;;, ' ��, �`.� ,t� � " ::r: � ! r / ��` �: � � ,.�r_a l��..�' } i-�� r '` i� - y .'! tt r' . � .7, -,{, ,. • L1i ��'T.'!1''X�i�l .�' + - .� ` . • �' ��,�N,,��y yy�}� ,y�� _...7_t� �Y y."t' � y,_ ''. ' ��C !di . ��.�?' . ..V� . ,'�°'}'� .. c'�� •�4`�ll.L,.,.�. . . .,..�.��'�.�.�{6r i -- , .) PITKIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA � District Courtroom i TUEBDl1Y. ]1PRIL 13. 1993 5:00 PH pIIBLIC COMMENT ' CONSENT A(3ENDA 1. Minutes of March 23 and March 30 Meetings, Jeanette Jones � 2. Abatement Hea�ing, Carol Foote 3. CDOT Contract, Tim Whitsitt 4. National County Government Week Proclamation, Reid Haughey 5. Colorado Pablic Health Week Proclamation, Tom Dunlop 6. Addressinq Resolution, Tom Newland ADtiINIBTRATIOE POBLIC HEARINGB 1. Resolution Approving Co-Housing Contract, Mark Fuller 2. Co-Housinq Ground Lease Ordinance, Mark Fuller � - 3. 1993 Affordable Housing Guidelines, Tom Baker LAND OSE PIIHLZC HEARINGS 4. Casey Caretaker llwelling Unit, Ellen Sassano � �I 5. Woods Caretaker Dwelling Unit, Mary Lackner ( 6. Tabequache Ranch General Submission and 1041 Ha2ard Review, ' j Mary Lackner (Applicant requesting tabling to June � �� 15th) 7. Richards Caretaker Dwelling IInit Review, Mary Lackner 8. Moon Run Ranch General Submission, 1041 Hazard Review and GMQS Allotments, 5uzanne Ronchan LAND USE ACTIONS 9. Avalanche Associates Rezoning; ist Reading and Set for � ----- ;-:.��i Public Hearing, Mary Lackner ?:�".i ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS 10. Resolution and Contract, State of Colorado Aviation `�� Discretionary Grant Program, Scott Smith il. Resolution Authorizing Snow Dump Application, Aeid Haughey !-. 12. Resolution Designating Official Newspaper of Record, John ! Ely 13. East Owl Creek Options, Tom Baker !t �r-. � 9:00 PM SPECIAL MEETING -- EXECUTIVE SESSION Burnt Mountain Planning Process � Highlands Litigation Settlement � � ' 9:30 ADJOURN SPECIAL MEETING � A SREAK WILL BE TAKEN AT 7:00 PM !• i� PL8A88 NOT$: ALL PUSLIC HEARING$ ARE NOTICED FOR 5:00 PM. ACTOAL TIMES �'., 11ILL V71RY. i �' f. . .. __,._ _. . ....y.:;�� . .. '- ,.,., ._ .. ... ... , _.. _ _ � . � � 1 ' , ' _ i ��: ' ., ;��,s,t' . :..F.; !� � , � � � ,, , . , ,, , � . :. ::. �.; '�,,, c , . . : ,... -.: _' �'_. .:, ,�,;. �•{P ' � . .; I ��y ;y �'�. �t . . - . . � ". "1p�3 �'. . .. - � .�'� .. ' �•T.r.a a �LN i�� .�.� � !a �� I'� klf3r'! �E� ,�1}fa. . ,�1;�. �4 . �. •,�5 � " ^.'rT��'��'� �1C�t � Y.r �t"'y4jt� r �y �..# !-.! �T� y �.��r r.i <�4 _::,,..R�.' �� ; ; �; � !��/��a ,ti j. -_ . c�-��-93 MIN[TTE$ � {-'� PITRIN COIINTY HOARb OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERS �; • ` REGIILAR MEETINC APRIL 13. 1993 CALL TO oRDER: Chairman Tuite called the meeting to order at 5:00 i. �. p.m. CO1�II�dI88ION MEMBERS PREBENT: Commissioners Wayne Ethridge, Bill �.,... Tuite, Jim True, Fred Crowley and Bob Child :� � " PUBLIC COMMENT: Tuite asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak to a matter not on the agenda. There being no comment, he closed the public comment portion of the meeting. ' CONSENT AGENDA: APPRO�IAL OF MINUTES OF MARCH 23 APiD MARCH 30 MEETINCS RESOLIITZON APPROVING AN A$ATSMENT PETITION FOR PROPERTY TAR REFIIND SIIBMITTED BY DANIEL AND LORRY RSNNEY i �y RSBOLIITION APPROVING AN ABATEMENT PETITION FOR PROEPRTY TAS REFUND ��,�� SIISMITTED HY CpIILTER LEASING APPROVING CONTRACT WITH COLORADO DSPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RESOLUTION ENDORSING CERTAIN ADDRESS CHANGES RECOMMENDED BY THE ADDRESS COMMITTEE NAT=QNAL COIINTY GOVERNMENT WEEK PROCLAMATION � COLORADO PIIBLIC HEALTH idSER PROCLAMATION - Commfssioner True movea approval of the Consant Aqenda. With a second by Commissioner child, the motion passed with thrae yea `t votes. . Commissionar Ethridqe atta Commissioner Crowley entared the meetinq. � Tuite announced that there would be an executive session held at y ,� the end of the meeting to @iscuss a potential conflict af interest regarding the Highlands application. ADMTNISTRATIVE pUSLIC HEARINGS `� `�" � RESOLUTION £BTABLZSHTNf3 AN AGREEMENT AITH COMMON GROUND $OUSING ASSOCIATION INC REGARDING DEMOLITION OF THE COMMIINITY CENTER THE DE9ELOPMENT OF HID DOCUMENTS BIDDZNG AND CONTRACTING FZNAL DEBIGN AND MANAGEM$NT OF CONSTRUCTION OF AN AFFORDABLE $OUSING COMPLEX ON � BOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERS 1 APRTL 13� 1993 ' �:.,: � � �i. : �'.. , `'. � � v . . ... ...._'.___.______. ............... . ,. i * . ��y-........:..,.... - . . .. ....... . _.. ........ - r. . y�:.,,_ .. ... ,` . . . ... . .. . . � , � _ � ' . ♦ .. �� ;�.. ` ii . .. � . " � ' , J + 'C.:"�t3�. . ' . ' � . � � ��';}3+. � , � .) � :.�- ..-. �,- ._�' t �1. ' t�`1 E � ., . .. ., i Y / �r�-O �, � B '.I{ a e�� n L:+� �� * g+ � � t-. . 1 . .Y .,t ��ttt. ` � `3+ �F� �T1.1 w� ,�yul��ls ,� ,� � Y,'�_�,` ...� ,« � �;F ��°�,t. ,�'e �a:� « �Yl�. . _ . .. _. . ....��'��„ �`'' �` ..�r+l'Bt. �� ..:... . ; ... }° . � � I -- THE SITE OF THE COMMUNITY CENTEA — MOTION TO APPROVE AND BET BOR ' SECOND READING ON APRIL 27. 1993 +' r� RE80I,UTION AOTHORIZING THE EXECIITION OF A LAND LEABE BETWEEN PITRIN COIINTY AND COMMON GROIIND HOII$ING INC FOR TliE COMMUNITY CENTER PROPERTY - MOTION TO APPROVE AND SET FOR SECOND READING ON APRIL 27. 1993 APPROVING 1993 AFFORDABLE HOUSING GUIDELINES - lst by Wayne 2nd by True unanimaus. Commissioner Ethridqe move� approval of first readiaq and set for ! . second readinq on April 27, 1993. With a second by Commissioaer i True, the motion passed unanimously. � �. RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL TO TIiE CASEY CARETARER ONIT - MOTION TO APPROVE - Ellen Sassano, representing the Planning Office, summarized this item as an application, submitted by Douqlas R. Casey Trust, for a caretaker unit within a barn on Lot 2 of the Casey Subdivision. There are no unresolved issues with this application, and therefore, staff recommends approval Tuite suggested that the 1041 approval be referred to in the • resolution. Tuite opened the hearing to public comment. There being none, he closed the public hearing. Commissioner Child moved approval with aa amendment that the 1041 ,� i review be zeferenoed and with all the conditiona of that approval. Nith a second by Commissioner Crowley, the motion passed • ��`� I unanimously. � RESOLIITION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A CARETAICER DiPSLLINC3 tJNST ON LOT 1 WOODS LOT SPLIT - MOTION TO APPROVE - Mary Lackner, representing the Planning Office summarized this item as an application, submitted by Richard R. Woods to construct a detached caretaker dwelling unit. the caretaker dwelling unit is proposed to be _.__ _ located on Lot 1 of the Woods Lot Split. ,� �,;`.s.:_,� Lackner said the applicant has met the requirements of the code, , and staff recommends approval of the application. ,� ,�� Child asked that it be made a condition that all the conditions of j' _ the 1041 approval be met. Tuite opened the hearing to public comment. There being none, he closed the public hearing 1 :''w: � Cammissioner Crowley moved approval of the resolutioa with the suqgestion by Commissioner child. With a second by Commissioaer ) Child, the motion passed unaaimously. � � TABEGUACHE RANCH GENERAL SOBMISSION AND 1041 HA2ARD REVIEW - MOTION TO TABLE TO JIINE 15. 1993 ;': BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2 APRIL 13� 1993 : � ��. ; � �.._ � _._.__... _ _ ... �, r- . �� r � • \ ' . _ r;s;a�' . ,��,� .. . ;�� r � �� . . . .. � �ti.. ! .. '�tyf ��i�.� Y�-�. ��a yr� �.y�...� �,� �+ . . � ' t YaS�tli�{ '.K�,,��' ,�' � .q �� 1.' • ` J.� .�� . G �:i y �: ,+. kj�� a� ,,.,�Y.- �e''Mj� r ' .r�„`� ,b."•,�i�r.,j.�� ;E.e c�U : .!�'�'.� ;�f+ . ^��.. �' ,. _ ��.ti:: ;� :z> - ; ' Commissiones Crowley moved to table this matter to June 15, 1993. . .f Wzth a second by Commissioner Child, the motion passed unanimously. RICHARDS CARETAKER DYIELLING IINIT - MOTION TO TABLE INDEFINITELY �'- '� i_: Commissioner Crowley moved to table this matter indefinitely until the water problems agsociated with the property could be worked _ out. With a secottd by Commissioner Ethridqe, the motion passed ,� � unanimously. j FIRST READING - ORDINANCE GRANTIN(i PARTIAL REZONING APPROVAL TO I ' � AVALANCHE AS$OCIATES FROM ��IINCLA38IFIED�' AND '�AF-1" TO ��AF-1�' AND F �rg_yn - MOTION TO APPROV& AND SET BOR SECOND READZNG �;', Commissioner Crowley moved approval of first reading and set for second readinq and public heazinq on April 27, 1993. With a second by Commissioner Child the motion passeA unanlmously MOON RIIN RANCH GENERAL SIIBMZ88ION - MOTION TO TABLE TO MAY 4. 1993 Commissioner Child moved to tab2e this matter to May 4, 1993. With - a second by Commissioner Crowley, the motion passed unanimously. RESOLIITION AND CONTRACT STATE OF COLORADO AVIATION DTSCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM - MOTION TO APPROVE - Scott Smith, Airport Director, summarized this item as a resolution to request from the State Aviation Grant of $10,000 to match a budget item to do some non- federally eligible maintenance projects at the airport this summer. . A�� ; Also, the resolution would empower the project manager to sign the ��_�j contract with the state. � Commissioner Ethridqe moved approval of the resolution as drafted. � FTith a second by Commissioner Child, the moYion passed unanimously. � RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PROCESS OF AN APPLICAT=ON FOR A SITE FOR ___ � THE CITY OF ASPEN SNOW DIIMP - MOTION TO APPROVE - Reid Haughey, , County Manager, stated that staff is looking for direction on which parcel the Board would like pursued in an application with the City �`� of Aspen. Pending which parcel the Board chooses, a time table will then need to be set for processing the application. One �� parcel has been processed, but the other parcel has not. � �, F ' ( A discussion ensued with respect to which site Commission members ;, i wanted to pursue. f Ethridge commented that he thinks it is appropriate to pursue site ! � No. 1 on the airport side. He thinks the staff analysis on this 1� �w�' site left a lot to be desired, it was a good effort given the time 1 .,1'�.�';± constraint but there is only one chance to do this right. And he I � ` � contends that the airport site gives the County an opportunity to �' work with the City, an opportunity to solve some problems at the airport shown by the analysis that being the soft area of the :;'�.. ; � HOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERB 3 APRIL 13� 1993 i � I r, ,� . I a � . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . �. . . . . . . . � . . . . , I � . o — � � r .e%r±' ., :¢. .. • �p.TY � r, , . ,,, � X'�, �:' e ,� �-. .r .J. .. , � 4.. � �! �r,a ` �.p „rs�-S�,Y+�t'�'".� , . r . �' . � `li .+< ' �1Y -� � `,�is�-�Cy ��,'� ' , . � � ,y, ,V y .� Y�1L ) ;'..'b '4Y3Y�` � �i ' ' �� ... � ..� ��.' �i. �'4°�N�•.F ..ri ��c�..t..4Y i. . . .. .{..e'lu��ti� F• --- , runway. He thinks this kind of industrial use is inappropriate in :'' �� the highway corridor, but he thinks it could be made to work, in working with the City, on the airport side. !-' Child commented that he agrees with Ethridge. Commissioner Crowley moved to authorize the City to proceed Porward with an application for a snow dump on the east s3de of Hiqhiray 82 at the oriqinal snow dump application site, beinq next to the �' maintenance £acility. Commissioner True seconded the motion. i Ethridge commented that he thinks the issues are far from being � resolved on this site. He does not think it is the right location for this land use, £eels very strongly about that and will continue � to raise those objections. Tuite called the question. The motion passed with three yea votes , by Commissioners Tufte, crowley and True and two aay votes by Commissioners child and Ethridqe. Tim Malloy advised the Board, that they have the option toniqht, � � . if they so choose, to reconsider some of the issues that Ethridge has brought up or set a date for a second reading where at those i issues would be pursued prior to a motion to approve or deny. It was agreed that a site visit would be conducted on April 27. Ethridge commented that the Board has consistently said, that it is buying the Paepcke Ranch for open space, and now the first use � �s�, which is being praposed is not open space, but rather a heavy °-�. industrial use, and he would like the Board to think about that, in terms of open space. Tuite responded that the Paepcke Ranch was bought for many uses inc2uding diversion of the highway and increasing the airport area. " - �;�.i It was agreed that the matter wou2d be scheduled for a public hearing on April 27, 1993. � :ry•.:� • RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THS ASPEN TIMES WEERLY AS TH8 �FFICIAL t, �'� NEWSPAPER OF RECORD - MOTION TO APPROVE - John Ely, County �� " Attorney, summarized this item as a house keeping matter, in keeping with the home rule charter. E� Commissioner Ethridge moved to 8esiqnate the Aspen Times iveekly as the official newspaper of record. With a second by Commissioner � Crowley, the motion passed unanimously. , M^ � .:!� RESOLIITION ESTABLZ8HING FIVE DEED RE6TR2CTION OPTIONS FOR EAST OW7i ' CREER HOMEOWNERS - Tuite stated that at the last meeting the Board ffi discussed that there are four landholders in the East Ow2 Creek development, and they all have different issues, and the existing �;'; �'�+ HOARD OF COIINTY COMMZSSIONERS 4 APRIL 13� 1993 � �' r . � �,. i / �' .. �..��:. -. , _._._. ._,. _ _.. .. . _ •.. �r �.: , ,: .: _ , � �- � . S; ` . � � ` ' • � ��' f��;a , ��-. � • • ,..,,. _ e r , . :n ' `.. 'x' -..t. i ,. � .. . i. "' S e::4. J S�.:r:> �A � .:��.7�iy� t � � } � _ � -'ti i S Y.. %t t � �.i ii'r � _7, . „ LsL�� ..�{� h .ti ,f�,,p� 4 a^w � • uw . ?��;�� °: � ''.,.��.+5 roY . .P � z!S. . . '�".S"�` -- ... . .�M...�e i � aat.: _r�.st.�i.,�� .n 1,,`. i�.'Y; , �� __ option to them is one option. The Housing Authority went back and 1'�'.>• � offered another option that is being looked at. The Board � discussion followed and they are Iookinq for other options. This � ° is not setting a precedent, but this is trying to address the issues of all the landowners and see if we can come up with a �.'= •'� resolution. Tom Baker, stated that at the last meeting, the BoCC requested that the Housing Authority Board review a list of potential alternatives ;�;�: - ` that came up in discussion from various sources, a couple of the � � alternatives came from the property owners, a couple came from the i housing board, and a couple were developed in discussions with the iI' BOCC. The Housin Board reviewed those alternatives on April 7, �. , and they found that their existing resolution No. 92-8 expressed �: E their views about the Owl Creek issue. He said in summary, what ` � that resolution says, is that the base resale price of the units � should be $135,800, which can be increased at an annual. ` appreciation rate of six percent or CPI, which ever is less, and i that appreciation would start at the time of C/O. In addition to that there would be a $30,000 adjustment for unforeseen site development costs that would not be allowed to appreciate, it would . ' just be a flat figure that could be added to the resale price. " � There would be no capital improvement allowance, and the income categories would be changed to be category 3 aND 4, with a � preference towards 3, and the homeowners would have the option to � retain the original deed restriction that has been signed or sign � a new one. i Baker said the Housing Authority Board also indicated that they Ca were opposed to any cash payment to the East Owl Creek homeowners. Sv`�'�_i,,� He proceeded to review the alternatives as follows: i.. . 1. Provide a cash payment of $20,000 as an adjustment for lot and site development costs; maximum sales price will be $i35,8o0 !: • or actual construction cost (minus $20,000), whichever is less; ' appreciation at a rate of 3$ or CPI, whichever is less; _ _ appreciation will accrue from the time that the building permit was i; • issued. 2. Allow the maximum resale price to increase up to $185,800 y �� or actual construction cost, whichever is less; appreciation will � � be accrued at a rate of 3� or CPI, whichever is less; appreciation s will accrue from the time the building permit was issued. o 3. Provide a cash payback ranging between $17,000 - $34,000 ' � depending on each owners site prep and lots costs; the maximum ! resale price will range between $123,000 - $181,000 depending on ;�, �; ' individual construction costs; appreciation at 6� or CPI, whichever � is less; appreciation to accrue from time of building permit; once �� i �: value of home reaches $185,000, then appreciation will drop to 3t � or CPI, whichever is less (this is the homeowners' modified ;', proposal) :i`',. BOARD OF COIINTY COMMIBSIONEAS 5 APRIL 13� 1993 ¢, .; 1'�. ; i •�s._ � � , � . . .. ..-... _...._.:�.._.y_. ,.. . . .. ... � . -� .,r.�-.._.....: . .. . .. . .. . _..... . . .. - . . .. . . � �• �_ � �, � � - \ . . Y��, . � . ' ., e�a ��r'., • s•�.,, ;�: ti � , .��:.�f.. . t� A { � .t . ;' - .,_�r �_ �i,t` r i' .�. r{�.f� �"�: � , ;n��Y '�t �.* ^ �:. . . Y: � r St r t • , 5 � . - �r�+;�!�i1t ,�: ' �;•; �`��, - ' •. �. 4'�� N?r . .��t � .li � ..Y Y 5 4 (::. � . � .� �.$s - 5: ' .� . � .".'�•.r �„�.,E. . f`Awl .!rir.:�f,.��° . � '�:_ �}; '. �'t�:- �> !�i __ l:�. 4. The Housit� Board's ; � g proposal. Base resale price $135,800; r appreciation at 6� or CPi, whichever is less starting from issuance ;. of C.O.; $30,000 adjustment to sale price at time of resale for unforseen site development costs, this figure does not appreciate. 5. Reimburse the homeowners for all receipted site development costs. Reimburse each homeowner $19,999 for lot costs, '-'' � Restrict Lots E3 and E4 to a maximum resale price of $165,800 or actual cost minus reimbursements, whichever is less. Restrict lot �,�r`. E2 to a maximum resale price of $180,000 which can be depreciated to $165,000 through low interest loans by the County to the lot �l. owner. Capital improvements can average 1� per year. Appreciation � shall accrue based upon the CPI. The Housing OfPice shall require � the developer to bring the access road up to standard and plant a �i'� � row of trees between Sam Stapleton�s property and lot E1. the � Housing Office sha21 be responsible for any legal and accounting � costs associated with this agreement. (This alternative is Patricia McKenzie's most recent proposal). • Tom Oken proceeded to review a summary of the implications of each ' of the scenarios. A discussion ensued with regard to the different alternatives. Several of the homeowners were present to discuss their proposal �`: with Commission members. • �� Trish McKenzie proceeded to summarize her proposal for Commission � members. Child suggested Scenario 8 with a 6 percent appreciation with the appreciation starting at the time of permit. I � A discussion ensued with regard to Scenario 8. . ;'� Ethridge commented that $135,800 is the basis for all of the lots ,-.�a and then add the $17,000 plus $20,000 and $34,000 respectively to ?' et to the basis � g price. Then a 6� inflation up to $185,000 `` starting at permit time. : ` Several homeowners spoke with respect to the unforseen site � � development costs associated with construction of their homes, and � �`- the justification for them asking for a cash pay back. t € ' . � McKenzie said they ran into a number of delays associated with - going through the building permit process, and proceeded to outline I these events. " `��' ,� � A discussion ensued with regard to cutting a check for a cash +�1 � payment. f;{!. i;� � HOARD OF COOtITY COMMI68IONERS 6 APRIL 13� 1993 � '�; i n.- � ,::...� . _ ._ _ . � �z ; � � ' _ . , , . � . . . � r . ,�.'��? � � . . • ��::y: ' . . � � , . . ��: a�f � � � e , '''�`! i�i t i, ; "' t y. t� ,J,,�'r �f .'� �r tf t �i,' � , � .. . ,.i r! '( r P Y A �i! �� a - . • ' k ° � _ �� .�, 5 �7J'Jf�- ..� a . . r ' 1, .. . � � . -.� ,�,'�y�,�.�, �:�� . t�\ 4A'�`N Q �.: t7S.''�15 ..c �. � '!.�'M�' +!. �4•< .,,�t, Aw:t. Ft.. . . ,. o t� .� '�{�,;. � -- __ True stated that he is willing to go with the originally executed `' xestriction of $135,800, 6$ appreciation starting at C/O. He � recognizes that there are some problems, but he is not willing to � ' do a cash payment. He thinks the problems that have been outlined in many discussions can be addressed in Scenario 8. Crowley stated that with regard to cash outlay, he is willing to put it on the end, and that is what he likes about Scenario No. 8; the homeowners can recoup the cash at the end of the project. • Chairman Tu3te asked for a vote oa the individual scenarios as � . follows: � No. i - There being oniy one affirmative vote by Commiasioner � Tuite, this option was eliminated. No. 2 - There were four yea votes by Commissioners Tuite, True, Child and Ethridqe and one nay vote by Commissioner Crowley to keep this scenario as an option. j ; No. 3 - There were no affirmative votes cast in favos of this • sceaario. No. 4 - All those in favor to keep this as option to siqnify by saying aye. It was a unanimous vote to keep this scenario as an ; option. No. 5 - There were no affirmative votes cast in favor of tbia scenario. �'�� No. 6 - 7 - Zt was agreed that these scenarios were still an ; option. � No. s - It was unanimous that this scenario would still be an option. -- --,'� Tuite said Scenarios 2, 4, 6, 7 and 8 are sti12 an option for '�-,t:t discussion. ' ; ':yal : • MeKenzie asked Commission members if they wouldn't reconsider one a , `� - of two options in her proposal. ` � � . f.; Tuite said that Trish McKenzie offered turning her house into an y " Ro, selling it for whatever, taking the difference of her costs and reimbursing the other three homeowners for land and �site - development the difference. If this should pass then there is no doubt in his mind that there is eot going to be a further recoup = w� anywhere. He asked how the Board feels about that? �� Ethridge commented that there is two issues. First is whether or �� not it becomes an RO unit. The second is, what do you do with the s:t proceeds because if you do sell it and the money comes back to the �;;; i BOARD OF COONTY COMMISSIONER6 7 APRIL 13, 1993 i i 4 �F . . _ . _ .. . _ . . _. _ � , ... • � \ ' , . ' � �7 � I , ,;;-�:-. <�,=;..s,' - _ ' ,�p. t=>,' ..�'� ', u ..,.. . �'t�; � ' ' ,c �J' �+��t�X�;t �ik� -.;� � .. �y,.,-t��1f�� 5._� ;�� r}'�`... ' � _�; 1 i a�� . �y �,�.�� y°4�'73�ir�, YCUx�.;� 5} �',�41�� r '4Y..�`� !41 i._.•,. � . � �r• 1R r : 1''. g�� .!s.� .�t'�t' ` . . ? -�+. ..Y�.�� . � „� �a4�z��s?:..�kt�� . . ��t ..b �� ' �' , 4 ��• :i• housing authority in theory. there will still be a cash outlay for �;�� the other three lot owners. 4•"_<• _ �_-- �r• A discussion ensued as to whether or not the McKenzie unit should . �--•� be converted into an RO unit. - :;. Crowley said what he would like to do is offer the homeowners Scenarios 2, 4, 6, 7, or 8. His point is, that one of those five options is going to work for everybody with the exception of the a�.": McKenzies. . , True sai.d that there is an outstanding loan with Trish McICenzie, and the Board recognizes the dilema that she is facing, however, he does not think that situation is going to be resolved at this � meeting. There may be alternatives that will allow Trish to stay, � but he thinks this is going to have to be discussed at another time. �`�'� ';. Tuite agreed that the McKenzie unit will have to be discussed ' ! individually, and he would like to ta2k about the timing of that, but to bring this to closure he would entertain a motion on Options � 2, 4, 6, 7 and 8 that they go into a resolution offerinq this to �. � the homeowners. � � • � commissioner Crowley so moved. commissioner True seconded the �` : motion. Crowley amended the motion that 90 days frod the date the � i resolution is siqned, the homeowners must choose one of the options � ; aad wi22 be recorded as a separate deed restriction on that piece i , �} � oP property. He is not includiag the McRenzies as part oP this ' 'i:�-� motion. � - r. Trus accepted this aunendmeat to the motion. �he motion passed � � unanimously. � . �' : , It was agreed that Trish McKenzie's situation will be fliscussed in � _._.._ _! a work session on April 26. . �'' Tuite told Ms. McKenzie, that it is not the intention of any member � of the Board to see her misplaced. �� ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m. { °� . Re pectfully s m tted � � ! /A�1�(�� '1R.J �•_. , vG eanette Jone ° yi'i? lerk to the Board of County Commissioners � ;!� . BOARD OF COiTNTX COMMIBSZONER$ 8 APRIL 13� 1993 ; �'� i ;,�{,'•� ; � �;� � E _a, i ;.........__..._ __.__..... _ ____.._ _---- . .......__. ..._-- -- -------- __. _.. . , . . 'o � " ' ~ ' , '� ` � \, ' � . � / ' nY��•` • ' ' � • ' i��v�,cl. • ^,��.