Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.res.018.1989 , _ r`. � :.�'1:i;- � . . � .,. � .,... �...... ... . . ... .< ...v-_.._ . ' ._' . ... . , . . f �`, � . . f . . . .,. ;�ty�� �+�1' 1�J6 }�,�);iS�'{6k , y r ' y�f� ,tid j;4 ��� „ ����>'; � ; ~y �.-¢��l �' M!� \ ti�'1� r��'y.�' i?- � i, w. .�A °��.'.�..��,:.t_�1.���-.tti.�.�t7����a u�.-:'r'a'k.§fi' _ .� . �, . ���:, .�d�i�"' '�1.` n �..���,.r., �V . . . ��k 11t'+J��� Recordedat�`�o' iock.�M� �Iq� �:-,,- F.;� R�ception No �o�q�� �aoK '��� ` , �5�� 'S!lVIA DAYlS PITKlN COlJNN1Y RECORDER e00It 615 PA�E385 RESOLL7TION OF THE BOARD OF COIINTX COMMISSIONERS - OF PITKiN COIJLI'PY, C07ARAD0 GRANTING GENERAT, SUBMISSTON n- � � APPROVAI, FOR 2Q1 WEST COOPER PIIA o - K � "'O � Resqlution No. 89-� j:' j�V " � q�W � �:Mi`ar;:.::.:,'. Q�- `S.' . O �z Cfl] ' T ..:, . . � —�U �HERFt�S, on January 24, 1989 the Board of County r ' ('7 � � ' ;' - � Commi�siongrs of Pitkin County, Colorado ��hereinafter Board" � reviewed the 201 West Cooper PUD; and 0 � q WFIEREAS, the 201 West Cooper parcel is Iocated on Shadow � '� � .: � v Mountain, more specifically described in Exhibit ��A"; and f � ` � (� Wf�,REAS, the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Cammission �` :'�' ` � ` ;;y reviewed the application and recommended approval to the Board; ��y J and " •� � WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council reviewed the application � } � �, �' ,, given its close proximity to the City limits and recommended » � ��: � approval with specific conditions relative to city 8040 Greenline ,, � review priter�a; and `� �'� WFIEREAS, the Board feels that the proposed PUD approach is �;_ _;; � :� � `�� � �;; ! preferable to development on the four individual mininq claims; t; ,� �, � and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEA, that the Board of Couaty � � � . . . . . � p Commissioners of Pitkin County grant General Submission approval �`` ; of the 201 West Cooper PUD with the following conditions of approval: 1. Prior to Detailed Submission review the applicant *, ;" t:� shall: l.s{. � a. Submit a letter from the Aspen Consolidated '�.��y� Sanitation District committing to sewer service. �3' ,.� ;;x�'� ,;`� #-:; x� ��- �s� .:-� �,t, _ .-' }�, _ ._. — �>;:r�``�� ;:.r :.��,�:� .r r 1 . � .. . . ,.t;:�ir+�_ . - . �', 3+��- t,.. . . ' ^ .� . . . '"AI-�'�� � � . � 'kK'�'g,'1�n5�. . . .. . , . . . . � - , �w,t,�'i� . - . ' .�t:�c"b!, . .. � � ��:��A`:�ST: _ ";'`�4�''�,�.,:t.• _ ���d���"� �� 4 . . . .. ���� e�b.���� � � • . . . . �" _ �f� ' `, ,; ,�� ,{ �,���,.',.. ,,� �5� t`,���r�,, ;,t �, ��R ����. , r� ., g 4 ��,,��r. ' , .� � y -� t ✓ � � r i, °.. � n` l "'�..�. 5�"�5 +'��. 1 t a#1.�i ; :��`�7����, . ����G'������� � .,'.��. I��' . . ,�_ �� � ,' � " . a . icL. w..�.� ...t;. �...�.... _ .-t ct.�Ro. �t� . "• eonK 615 r�cE386 e0��s 'r�,� ,��;7�� Resolution No. 89-� Page 2 b. Contact the Fire Marshall and design the �`''': � road/driveway in accordance with his requirements. " c. Submit a letter from the City of Aspen committing �.�"`' to water service. r_.;`::: �.; d_ Research the possibility of relocating the Midland ::cr' � right-o£-way trail to the north and present a - _t proposal to accomplish the trail relocation � �.� e. Research the possibility of constructing a grade separate trail and present a proposal for the � ,� trail crossing. f. Submit elevation drawings of the road and �v - driveway's. ����` �:; ;: g. The applicants shall submit design parameters for r"` the homesites. This shall include limitations on �;.Y.�:� .. -r.� massing, length of walls, height and use of ` materials. No home is to exceed 6,000 square feet :r� including the Employee Dwelling Units. - ,r� . �_'.� h. Submit detailed engineering drawings of the road/driveway. ��� i. Submit a more detailed geologic analysis of potential water seepage or slide potential. '� '°'`�0 2. The applicant shall submit a fugitive dust plan prior .`,`::,; _ :. i to the issuance of a Building Permit. *;. ,;_, ����; 3. All material representations in the application shall be adhered to. 4. The development shall comply with the recommendations �'` made by Nick Lampiris and Dean Gordon contained within K ' +.-� the application. � _ - i: . 5. The applicants shall stake the building envelopes at �-y Detailed Submission representing the perimeter of the envelopes and the proposed height of the structures. :� - .;� 6. The Detailed Submission review of the application .� should include an evaluation showing the design _ _-;.:;;' `� parameters of the application based upon the City of �, ` � Aspen's 8040 Greenline criteria. The applicant shall �`': present information regarding building heights and �_° ''� footprints at Detailed Submission. `1;s,i;�� ' �� i :r.' "�'. :::I ':1., -L: t'� � w +f�'� :>< .. '-' .' : .�,.- ._... .. __ , _ _ � a p '�,'�?� 7..t . ,,., 4 ,... ."" . '•'�°Y�•`rr� � .. ... . . . � . �^-,�,��k''3�: . . ?�.'+`.:=�'.•:S"ro:� � ' , . • . .s>d"+'s:�`.., . ':n,y���'�i�.t.y� � , � ' ..��(r...'��, . . (: .S'.�/.'�i�T�'—��t . � � y.. j,i'. � �. . °i�,�.5� . ' . . . . � " � . . . , �����;: • ' �.� , ��;. `+�r.�� . :��`, . .. ��i?��';: ,�3��s; , v'-''�-�.. �" • . � 4.,�� .'.���. � . ' !;*�'#'��` � .�,��Y '� _ _..�_. � _ . - �:�, ; , � � �; ' ;`,. , ° .���� � 't��:}Y�d� c ; � ' .' ' .,e � ,1 �,„4� � y�'� �t r t'� � r t. .�.��tS 1� �4f �• r .. � w. . � ��?��4��2 a: . �j,ti�,;. , _ ���.:��`.,: �✓ _ ��t.1+��. ,':. y.... , . �a�nx �� t����t � � a�nK 615 PA�E38� Resolution No. 89-L Page 3 7. The Detailed Submission should be referred to the City �:�" Planning Commission and the Shadow Mountain 4�" '- Neighbozhood. � `�"'' t : ! 8. At Detailed 5ubmission the applicant should provide a s>' _ � proposal for the implementation of the Shadow Mountain !�:'<.�' { trails system consistent with the recommendations made % `.:.� ; � by A1 Blomquist. •� y� 9. All employee units shall be deed restricted with the ' i Housing Authority and open to the employee housing rental market. r � '. x�� APPROVED by the Board at its regular meeting on February 14, � z,' -i:. � 1989. � :4'. _. ``��;. BOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERS -��:� OF PITRIN COUNTY, COIARADO ti,':� // �� /� �-�- " - gy�a�_�l O__:���..o �s� Colette Penne, Chairperson };��� A ST: ��� .� �:��� =: �'''"� eanette Jon -, •; puty Coun Clerk ;�:. �s ��.� •?` APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: _ � � � � �; �'-7/��'1 - Thomas F. Smith, Alan Richman, County Attorney Planning Director � r r='�� ch.201reso � -r— � . �'�'.:-.�: v� t Y�4' �Y' . 1...�"'�;. �Y,; :,{ �;�3 ,�q . � ;_�`i 4:�:,�: �� :`14', . �Y . .... . .h?:ei..J:�a.:._.w'�:.r� �.�..'.:�-r...-:..+:� :... .,.....:.s.��,,,.�...�...- ..� ..... >.... '" . ......�.. __.. .. ..... ......._..., ._......�.._,� . F -..;};,,:...,.,�...... ...,W -r :,....:._. .,.�,::... .. :.,. t �{^�t.r : ' . �����Zy ._ { v��'�3��i�; , f.���i._i�.: . . .. , . . � . . �, � .�a��,':K" . - . � . . ' . � My..:���y . , . . . ' . . . " . - � . � , �r . .. . �1 � �k tif�t i � . - �. . +� �' � � . � .. . ' ��x,�: .. • . \ - . . ,��� �s�, �� ' . , � « t, _'�/�51, � .� � — ��;:; 1� � _ � . ...-.. _._ `F f5 �W. ��' �'�4��� .'�. q � �r1 Y ,.� }�� � }: :. ,�r . ,W .}- .d;�ma'.�'3,�'����dd?� .q�y:��� � r. t �HhA�"�jyt .���''•�•�' �n������...�j�r�'�.M��'SMn:.�.� � }� . ' � (�4� , . 'i�.�� � 4�' � .�R�,'. . � � ' EOON �1� PQGE'J�O LEGAL DESCRIPTI0�1 COPPEROPOLIS LUDE, MINERAL SURVEY NO. 1759* IN TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH. ' - RAN6E 65 WEST.OF THE 6th P.M., EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTI�N ' �' LYING WITHIN PRIDE OF ASPEN, MINERAL SURVEV NO. 7364 AND HUN7ERS -•- PRIDE� MINERAL SURVEY NO_ 1760, AND EXCEPTING THE UFPER -(50UTHERN _ � MOST) PORTION OF TNE COPPEROPOLIS L�DE MINING CLAIM� MINERAL � SURVEV NO. 1759 47HICH LIES WEST �F THE WEST SLDE LINE' OF THE ' z= ��;j PRIDE OF ASFEN MININ6 CLAIM� MINEFtAL SURVEY NO. 7364� BETWEEN '��'+' - CORNERS NO. 3 & 4 OF THE PRIDE OF ASPEN LODE. ALL AS DESCRIBED IN f: :_5y�-.:Vr.;;Z�'� , +.,_ BQOK 525 AT PAGE SBb OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, CDI.ORADO RECORDS. �. �:�;;� 't��� SIHLEY LODE MINING CLAIM U.S. MINERAL SURVEY NO. 9606 ACCORDING ', ;,;`��°"y� TO THE UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 227 OF � _;,;;;�, THE REC�RDS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CLEFiK AND RECORDER, PITKIN �f� COUNTY, COLORADO, EXCEPT THA7 PORTIOM THEfcEOF WHICH IS DESCRISED 'S;-��T=a"N - IN THAT CERTAIN DEED RECORAED IN BOOK 268 AT PAGE 40B OF SAID '�°��Y� RECOR�S_ ��:ti'ri':r..;•��.ti ' : . .;ti?a�`�.�, =��:��;,�","� THE ENTIRE PORTION DF THE MOLLIE G. LODE MINING CLAIM <M.S. 7577) '��'-Y:'.�:`'" LYING AND HEING SITl1ATED IN SECTI�N 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH� RFINGE . . ;..ty,9'�J , �,:`;':i 95 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS SH�WN ON THE HUREAU OF ��%r�'3r'�,'`�r LAND MANAGEMENT FLAT APPROVED FEBRUARV 24, 19H0, RECORDED .:�+.;;.--.:�,;.3 —•..v„'��� DECEMBER 8,•1986, IN BOOK 524 AT PA6E 552. , y y.Y [� � �� CONTAINING 9.64 ACRES MORE �R LE55 _ . � ' ,s.� � COUNTY OF PITKIN `�� �' ti STATE OF'EOLORADQ " i`r � �. i� .f.�-�� . . - 1.. .':���'� . ' . . _�� �� �j .� . . . . . . . _•4-�r.,' . �:; . �=-?t': . - - _ , • . "'�+� ,',y'.:", _ _ . " � -_'R;�� . � ' ��: . ',�:�+�Y"-:,$ - � . • . � ,�i+��j�.�V.,�'•=� ' . � � ♦ .1�� '1 �:r�} -__�._: _,.:�::� ,_:.::. __ __ _ _ ���r,; , __._ _. .._._:. ..,;._ ...... _ �:.:_. � _ .. __..__ �z�,.,�.��'sz;`.2� . ' � ' �J..�r. T �j�'v..c'�?rF� . ' , . . ' . �} '��'.. . . � � , ?" �"y..' _ . . . . . . . ��,��,_� . �� i;y��L�`,.�_.�:4. . • - � , `'e r��_:�� . . � ` .. . . - ' � ' . -.'C+��•� . � � .. . � � • �\. . S �rY cy �:, . . --�,w3.-h.,�oc..�,Y_ . . , . ... 2�.h�6'•�` :,�.°������4:: �'�7�4i1i�` � - . v�4Y "r � • ,' yL ����j � - t —