HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.res.018.1989 , _ r`. �
:.�'1:i;- � . .
� .,. � .,... �...... ... . . ... .< ...v-_.._ . ' ._' . ... . , . .
f
�`, � . . f . . . .,.
;�ty�� �+�1' 1�J6 }�,�);iS�'{6k , y r ' y�f� ,tid j;4 ��� „ ����>'; � ; ~y �.-¢��l
�' M!� \ ti�'1� r��'y.�' i?- � i, w. .�A
°��.'.�..��,:.t_�1.���-.tti.�.�t7����a u�.-:'r'a'k.§fi' _ .� . �, . ���:, .�d�i�"' '�1.`
n �..���,.r.,
�V . . . ��k 11t'+J���
Recordedat�`�o' iock.�M� �Iq� �:-,,- F.;�
R�ception No �o�q�� �aoK '��� `
, �5��
'S!lVIA DAYlS PITKlN COlJNN1Y RECORDER e00It 615 PA�E385
RESOLL7TION OF THE BOARD OF COIINTX COMMISSIONERS
- OF PITKiN COIJLI'PY, C07ARAD0 GRANTING GENERAT, SUBMISSTON
n- � � APPROVAI, FOR 2Q1 WEST COOPER PIIA
o -
K
� "'O � Resqlution No. 89-� j:'
j�V "
� q�W � �:Mi`ar;:.::.:,'.
Q�- `S.'
. O �z Cfl] ' T ..:, . .
� —�U
�HERFt�S, on January 24, 1989 the Board of County r
' ('7 � � ' ;'
- � Commi�siongrs of Pitkin County, Colorado ��hereinafter Board"
� reviewed the 201 West Cooper PUD; and
0
� q WFIEREAS, the 201 West Cooper parcel is Iocated on Shadow �
'� � .:
� v Mountain, more specifically described in Exhibit ��A"; and f � `
� (� Wf�,REAS, the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Cammission �` :'�' `
� `
;;y reviewed the application and recommended approval to the Board;
��y J and
" •� � WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council reviewed the application � }
� �, �'
,, given its close proximity to the City limits and recommended
» � ��:
� approval with specific conditions relative to city 8040 Greenline ,,
� review priter�a; and `�
�'� WFIEREAS, the Board feels that the proposed PUD approach is �;_ _;;
� :� � `�� � �;;
!
preferable to development on the four individual mininq claims; t;
,� �,
� and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEA, that the Board of Couaty �
� � . . . . . �
p Commissioners of Pitkin County grant General Submission approval �`` ;
of the 201 West Cooper PUD with the following conditions of
approval:
1. Prior to Detailed Submission review the applicant *, ;"
t:� shall:
l.s{.
� a. Submit a letter from the Aspen Consolidated '�.��y�
Sanitation District committing to sewer service. �3'
,.� ;;x�'�
,;`� #-:;
x�
��- �s� .:-� �,t, _ .-' }�, _ ._. —
�>;:r�``��
;:.r :.��,�:�
.r r 1 . � .. . .
,.t;:�ir+�_ . -
. �',
3+��- t,.. . . ' ^ .� . . .
'"AI-�'�� � � . �
'kK'�'g,'1�n5�. . . .. . , . . . . � - ,
�w,t,�'i� . - . '
.�t:�c"b!, . .. �
� ��:��A`:�ST: _
";'`�4�''�,�.,:t.• _
���d���"�
�� 4 . . . ..
����
e�b.���� � � • . . . .
�" _
�f� ' `, ,; ,�� ,{ �,���,.',.. ,,� �5� t`,���r�,,
;,t �, ��R ����. , r� ., g 4 ��,,��r. '
, .� � y -� t ✓ � � r i, °.. � n` l "'�..�. 5�"�5 +'��. 1 t a#1.�i ;
:��`�7����, . ����G'������� � .,'.��. I��' . . ,�_ �� � ,' � "
. a . icL. w..�.� ...t;. �...�.... _ .-t ct.�Ro. �t�
. "• eonK 615 r�cE386 e0��s 'r�,� ,��;7��
Resolution No. 89-�
Page 2
b. Contact the Fire Marshall and design the �`''':
�
road/driveway in accordance with his requirements. "
c. Submit a letter from the City of Aspen committing �.�"`'
to water service. r_.;`:::
�.;
d_ Research the possibility of relocating the Midland ::cr'
� right-o£-way trail to the north and present a -
_t
proposal to accomplish the trail relocation �
�.� e. Research the possibility of constructing a grade
separate trail and present a proposal for the �
,� trail crossing.
f. Submit elevation drawings of the road and �v
- driveway's. ����`
�:;
;:
g. The applicants shall submit design parameters for
r"` the homesites. This shall include limitations on
�;.Y.�:� ..
-r.� massing, length of walls, height and use of
` materials. No home is to exceed 6,000 square feet
:r� including the Employee Dwelling Units. -
,r�
. �_'.� h. Submit detailed engineering drawings of the
road/driveway.
��� i. Submit a more detailed geologic analysis of
potential water seepage or slide potential.
'�
'°'`�0 2. The applicant shall submit a fugitive dust plan prior
.`,`::,; _ :.
i to the issuance of a Building Permit. *;.
,;_,
����; 3. All material representations in the application shall
be adhered to.
4. The development shall comply with the recommendations
�'` made by Nick Lampiris and Dean Gordon contained within K '
+.-� the application. �
_ - i: .
5. The applicants shall stake the building envelopes at
�-y Detailed Submission representing the perimeter of the
envelopes and the proposed height of the structures.
:� -
.;� 6. The Detailed Submission review of the application .�
should include an evaluation showing the design _ _-;.:;;'
`� parameters of the application based upon the City of �, ` �
Aspen's 8040 Greenline criteria. The applicant shall �`':
present information regarding building heights and �_°
''� footprints at Detailed Submission. `1;s,i;�� ' ��
i :r.' "�'.
:::I ':1., -L:
t'�
�
w
+f�'� :>< .. '-' .' : .�,.- ._... .. __ , _ _ �
a p
'�,'�?� 7..t . ,,., 4 ,... ."" .
'•'�°Y�•`rr� � .. ... . . . � .
�^-,�,��k''3�: . .
?�.'+`.:=�'.•:S"ro:� � ' , . • .
.s>d"+'s:�`.., .
':n,y���'�i�.t.y� � , � '
..��(r...'��, . . (:
.S'.�/.'�i�T�'—��t . � �
y.. j,i'. � �. .
°i�,�.5� . ' . . . . � " � . . . ,
�����;: • '
�.� ,
��;.
`+�r.�� .
:��`, .
.. ��i?��';:
,�3��s; ,
v'-''�-�.. �" • . �
4.,��
.'.���. � . '
!;*�'#'��` �
.�,��Y
'� _ _..�_. � _ . -
�:�, ;
,
� � �; ' ;`,. , ° .���� � 't��:}Y�d� c ;
� ' .' ' .,e � ,1 �,„4� � y�'� �t
r t'� � r t. .�.��tS 1� �4f �• r .. � w. . � ��?��4��2 a: .
�j,ti�,;. , _ ���.:��`.,: �✓ _ ��t.1+��. ,':.
y....
, . �a�nx �� t����t
� � a�nK 615 PA�E38�
Resolution No. 89-L
Page 3
7. The Detailed Submission should be referred to the City �:�"
Planning Commission and the Shadow Mountain 4�" '-
Neighbozhood. � `�"''
t :
! 8. At Detailed 5ubmission the applicant should provide a s>' _
� proposal for the implementation of the Shadow Mountain !�:'<.�'
{ trails system consistent with the recommendations made % `.:.� ;
� by A1 Blomquist. •�
y� 9. All employee units shall be deed restricted with the '
i
Housing Authority and open to the employee housing
rental market.
r � '.
x�� APPROVED by the Board at its regular meeting on February 14, �
z,'
-i:. � 1989. �
:4'.
_. ``��;. BOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERS
-��:� OF PITRIN COUNTY, COIARADO
ti,':� //
�� /� �-�- " -
gy�a�_�l O__:���..o
�s� Colette Penne, Chairperson
};��� A ST:
��� .�
�:��� =:
�'''"� eanette Jon -,
•; puty Coun Clerk ;�:. �s
��.�
•?` APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_ �
� � �
�; �'-7/��'1
- Thomas F. Smith, Alan Richman,
County Attorney Planning Director � r
r='�� ch.201reso �
-r—
� . �'�'.:-.�:
v� t
Y�4'
�Y'
. 1...�"'�;.
�Y,;
:,{ �;�3
,�q
. �
;_�`i
4:�:,�:
��
:`14',
.
�Y . .... . .h?:ei..J:�a.:._.w'�:.r� �.�..'.:�-r...-:..+:� :... .,.....:.s.��,,,.�...�...- ..� ..... >.... '" . ......�.. __.. .. ..... ......._..., ._......�.._,� .
F -..;};,,:...,.,�...... ...,W
-r :,....:._. .,.�,::... .. :.,.
t �{^�t.r : '
. �����Zy ._
{
v��'�3��i�; ,
f.���i._i�.: . . .. , . . � . .
�,
� .�a��,':K" . - . � . . ' . �
My..:���y . , . . . ' . . . " . - � .
� , �r . .. . �1 �
�k tif�t i � . - �. .
+� �' � � . � .. . '
��x,�: .. • . \ - . .
,��� �s�,
�� ' . ,
�
« t,
_'�/�51, � .�
� —
��;:;
1� � _ � . ...-.. _._ `F f5 �W. ��' �'�4��� .'�.
q � �r1
Y ,.� }�� � }: :. ,�r . ,W .}- .d;�ma'.�'3,�'����dd?� .q�y:��� � r. t �HhA�"�jyt
.���''•�•�' �n������...�j�r�'�.M��'SMn:.�.� � }� . ' � (�4� , .
'i�.��
� 4�' � .�R�,'.
. � �
' EOON �1� PQGE'J�O
LEGAL DESCRIPTI0�1
COPPEROPOLIS LUDE, MINERAL SURVEY NO. 1759* IN TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH. '
- RAN6E 65 WEST.OF THE 6th P.M., EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTI�N '
�' LYING WITHIN PRIDE OF ASPEN, MINERAL SURVEV NO. 7364 AND HUN7ERS
-•- PRIDE� MINERAL SURVEY NO_ 1760, AND EXCEPTING THE UFPER -(50UTHERN
_ � MOST) PORTION OF TNE COPPEROPOLIS L�DE MINING CLAIM� MINERAL �
SURVEV NO. 1759 47HICH LIES WEST �F THE WEST SLDE LINE' OF THE '
z= ��;j PRIDE OF ASFEN MININ6 CLAIM� MINEFtAL SURVEY NO. 7364� BETWEEN
'��'+' - CORNERS NO. 3 & 4 OF THE PRIDE OF ASPEN LODE. ALL AS DESCRIBED IN f:
:_5y�-.:Vr.;;Z�'� ,
+.,_ BQOK 525 AT PAGE SBb OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, CDI.ORADO RECORDS. �.
�:�;;�
't��� SIHLEY LODE MINING CLAIM U.S. MINERAL SURVEY NO. 9606 ACCORDING ',
;,;`��°"y� TO THE UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 227 OF �
_;,;;;�, THE REC�RDS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CLEFiK AND RECORDER, PITKIN
�f� COUNTY, COLORADO, EXCEPT THA7 PORTIOM THEfcEOF WHICH IS DESCRISED
'S;-��T=a"N - IN THAT CERTAIN DEED RECORAED IN BOOK 268 AT PAGE 40B OF SAID
'�°��Y� RECOR�S_
��:ti'ri':r..;•��.ti ' :
. .;ti?a�`�.�,
=��:��;,�","� THE ENTIRE PORTION DF THE MOLLIE G. LODE MINING CLAIM <M.S. 7577)
'��'-Y:'.�:`'" LYING AND HEING SITl1ATED IN SECTI�N 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH� RFINGE .
. ;..ty,9'�J ,
�,:`;':i 95 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS SH�WN ON THE HUREAU OF
��%r�'3r'�,'`�r LAND MANAGEMENT FLAT APPROVED FEBRUARV 24, 19H0, RECORDED
.:�+.;;.--.:�,;.3
—•..v„'��� DECEMBER 8,•1986, IN BOOK 524 AT PA6E 552.
, y y.Y
[� � �� CONTAINING 9.64 ACRES MORE �R LE55 _ .
�
' ,s.� � COUNTY OF PITKIN `��
�' ti STATE OF'EOLORADQ "
i`r � �.
i�
.f.�-�� . . - 1..
.':���'� . ' . .
_�� ��
�j .� . . . . . . .
_•4-�r.,' .
�:;
. �=-?t': . -
- _ , • . "'�+�
,',y'.:", _ _ . "
� -_'R;�� . � '
��:
. ',�:�+�Y"-:,$ - � . • . �
,�i+��j�.�V.,�'•=� ' .
� � ♦
.1�� '1
�:r�} -__�._: _,.:�::� ,_:.::. __ __ _ _
���r,; , __._ _. .._._:. ..,;._ ...... _ �:.:_. � _ .. __..__
�z�,.,�.��'sz;`.2� . '
� ' �J..�r. T
�j�'v..c'�?rF� . ' , . . ' .
�} '��'.. . . � � ,
?" �"y..' _ . . . . . . .
��,��,_� . ��
i;y��L�`,.�_.�:4. . • - � ,
`'e r��_:�� . . � ` .. . . - ' � ' .
-.'C+��•� . � � .. . � � • �\. .
S
�rY cy �:, . .
--�,w3.-h.,�oc..�,Y_ . . , . ...
2�.h�6'•�`
:,�.°������4::
�'�7�4i1i�` � - .
v�4Y "r
� • ,'
yL
����j � -
t —