The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.min.reg.12121989 �: . - s: ., ,�ti a4.:;: . �.� �"'. ,�� y`,', e� /��'.k+ ��:�;:t'� FrJ'II�1 G1�T1R �IQ�+'!�S 1�IAR 1��HH�+1� Distri:c.-t�atr+o� (Cblett'Je Peivie mt p�sa►t) 7U�S�AY. �+1�i2 12. ]989 5:30 PM I[1ffi�IC CT1�I+IENP ;.?�:t.� . ;.��: ��'� �� '� � A71ilUd1 Ambl11al1oe LiceI1S�s� FS'6 QolulCil� M'LCYfdel IGe71G�TiCk (1) r.:��.._ Q�arige of Manager for ld�thie's Restautant T.imrr Licease, Ki]n Schultz (2) xa�s�.ng lsaitl�ority eoaxsi�ppointm�t (s) �" , � Anr�ci owl Creek SUbdivision I�mvements Aqreement atrl ,:,., Allar for Payment to East Owl cxeek Assoc., Mark PUller (4) ;j IATID iSE POffiSC I�AR�S � - � 2nd Reading oode Ame�oent-Isxu I�act SubdiVisions, Ciridy Ha�bAn (5) �a '- R & O FdLtilEYS IllW�IIlQdCt S17bdivlSi�1 GPI1eY'dl S1,tvni taipn� ' a "�: F11�Sassano (6) r... � Oli-Be�-�7oyfvl SUbdivisi�i Alneix�oent� Pl�hi ua�tmi�r� �y ��m (7y . `'1 Auster c�srsal SUbmission, Budrly iuoeiv, Zb be tabled to F'eb. 13 (8) f � IArID Us� P� � j I.S71d/X0�7pE1 InW I1lqJ3Ct SU2]dlvlsioJ7 F1ild1 Pldt a17d REZOII]S1CJr �Y � i � (9) � 7 � � I�9oII1FIR�s AND 0�7IIUlC15 ' ]st Reading and Set for Public Hearim�, Planning Offioe Fee Schedule, _� p�r Marean�m (10) . �� Pitkin Partage Conttact, ffiad Chri�*^t�r (11) r �;J AC�QIESt SeLV1C2S ODiltrdCt� ffidd CZ1L'1St'A�1PS (12) . i � P[JffiSC HFARIIJG ,� � 2� ReadirzJ, Resolution Ap�rovin9 Aoquisiti� of Himmirs�isd Iode, Tim S�itsitt, Buddy Iucem (13) ; x Second Readirg. 1990 �t Adoptiwi arrl Appropriatioai R�soluti�, Lynn � Dutllop, R�n Oken (14) �; � �� t,<„ $ PIFASE Nd1E: AIL POffi,IC F�1RIlT6 ARE 2IIIPI��LH2 5:30 P�S. PrCiSAL TII�9�S FTIIL VARY. � a ,r, � '; �� " -.. � i-;:"':-: ;a , ^ 'C';?'�•.. .,` F . ,�n!g^ .;_.,y'•., -7b�_ ^J � ,ll 1" �! n . � :�. `+�en �: .�, :�- �. . . � . C � .'.":.. , +. -," ;> .'u.::': _ ...,..,. ,�.. � �.'.�..'. '� � ..' . � ... . � `.!-. . ... . : . . '�.._�. ��":-: . '_ � _��rr�ees.!�'!�-" ' .:/ fi' � _�_ v� . 3:. . �^?M1fn;�.-f i" . , � � , . ' ''�':i{:�..:.x . _ .�7::s1� _ �� . . t.�.a;vy�;�„�`�� . • F,F;_ ..�i•� ' _ ' f . �y��i.�t4�'i . � ' -�k;Fi��- . . . ��: . •��_ v w�=t-�'l �'i'7.'�{.�:'i:"'.. . �i.,��wiY?K;�':�,, . . .:�'#�...'i'� •L��r�� A�" f. , �w��.. r . .�-y'.'t�' � � . ':',ii:�:,^'.. ��; _. ._.._ � __ . . �. ., � APPROVEO AT �-� ," �;.:. dAN u 419M9� '�,• �:'„ .. - �'lTNUTES {NEETtNu PITRIN COUN'I'Y BOARD OF COONTY COMMISSIQNERS REGIILAR MEETING DECEMBER 12. 1989 . MEMSERS PRESENT: Commissioners Herschel Ross, Jim True, Fred Crowley and Wayne Ethridge CALL TO ORDER: Vice-Chairman Herschel Ross called the meeting to 1 order at 5:30 p.m. ` PUBLIC CorIlKENT: Vice-Chairman Serschel Ross asked if there was � anyone present for public comment. There was none. f.ti�;": CONSENT AGENDA- i! � ��; � APPROVAL OF MINUTES �F NOVEMBER 28 1989 MEETING - MOTION TO r�%. APPROVE - PASSED UPIAPiIMO[SSLY � � APPROVAL OF ANNfJAL AMBUI�ANCE LICENSES - MOTION TO APPROVE- ?4 PASSED UNANIMOUSLY - Michael Kendrick, representing the Pitkin � County SherifP's Department, summarized this item by stating, -' that Colorado State law gives the responsibility for inspecting ti and licensing ambulances to each Board of County Commissioners. y The Board has in turn given the responsibility of inspections to • the Sheriff's Department. Results of these inspections are then ; forwarded to the Pitkin County Emergency Medical Services � Council. This Council then makes recommendations direct to the County Commissioners on the issuance of licenses. .. .. . v ::.. . . . �:c APPROVING WILLIAM E. RNAPP AS NEW MANAGER FOR RUTHIE'S RESTAURANT j HOTEL AND RESTAURANP LIOIIOR LICENSE - Kim Schultz, Deputy County Clerk, summarized this item by stating, that this is an ;� application for a change of manager at Ruthies Restaurant located ' on Aspen Mountain. With all Hotel and Restaurant Liquor 3 Licenses, it is required that such establishments get State and County approval on all managers and changes of managers. The new manager will be William E. Knapp. ' i APPOINTMENT OF RACHEL RICHARDS TO FILL A VACANCY CREATED IN THE �� HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD - Mark Fuller summazized this item by stating, that Louise Brainard, A county appointee to the Housing �{ Authority Board, resigned from that Board in late September. In the last two months, the Housing Department has advertised for a replacement and received five applications. Becasue of Ms. Richards dedicated interest in this matter it is recommended that - �J . BOARD OF CO[TNTY COMMISSIONERS 1 DECEMBER 12,1989 j '" : ' iujy� 'Y�� ; . '�-::: y '�•��'-5 r..� ' i. � .... ... �- '� � ., . .,__-,_.�..�:............... ,. �.. � �� . , . . r �� .. : -. _ .. �� : . i _ . ,_ -�=.-�"'�� . ._.i.�_;'; , f. : {'{.�: . .. � .. � '..r....'-.1..'� . ' .:EfY- ��;�xi"a,.-}z-��.`; . . y..-r _ ( � „�i: ' . i��.',j i � , .••:1�'.� . . :�3�`'Le:.::. . ,C^ ��.f-i.�� . . �w:}� . ' � 1; . .1�� .d 4�� ` � � . ��.,--,.,.- ,',t`.,..,- � ��- �,t,r ��:.°�;;: she be appointed as a member to the Board. APPROVING RESOLiITION TO AMEND TIiE SIIBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS j�GREEMENT AND PAYMENT TO EAST OWL CREEK CORPORATION FOR THE EAST OWL CREER EMPLOYEE LOTS - 2IOTION TO APPRO - PASSED UNANIMOUSLY - Terri Newland, representinq the Housing Authority, summarized �- this item by stating, that the Housinq Authority Board formally requests approval for an increase in the maximum livable square • foot allowance imposed on the East Owl Creek lots from 1,400 square feet to 2,000 square feet according to the Subdivision ~` ;?_,,; - '. Improvements Agreement. This increase would not affect the ~ �:� ' platted or approved building envelopes. The Housin Authorit �"�'`'`"` 4 Y �".,,_,.,,. has determined that the size of the lots and the size of the x�5'-_ families involved ustif this increase in the allowable s �� g 7 Y quare 2�;:'.`-.'.- foota e. The Housing Authority also requests approval for payment in the �, ' amount of $60,000 to the East Owl Creek Corporation for the East �°' ' Owl Creek Employee lots out of cash in lieu. The Housing ,��-` Authority originally planned to close on the lots the first week j't-: . of october with the winners of the lottery, and simultaneously Yti;' , transfer funds at that time to East Owl Creek Corporation. l However, the deed restriction for the lots has not been �;'`, finalized, and until it is, they will not be able to close on the �.�'•.• lots with the 'winners of the lottery. Closing is set for �r F� � February 1, 1990, and at that time they will pay back the cash in { lieu account. � S Commissioner True moved approval of the Consent Agenda items. Commissioner Crowley seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. SECOND READING - ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IAW IMPACT SDBDIVISION ' REGIILATIONS - MOTTON TO APPROVE - PASSED UN'ANSMOUSLY - Cindy � Houben, representing the Planning Office, summarized this item by .. stating, that the first reading of this ordinance was approved on October 24, 1989. At that meeting, staff was asked to amend the � ordinance as follows: 1. Section (viii) (d) (1) (b) was deleted (making reference to a non-existent section of the regulations) . 2. Section (F) the Sunset provision was updated providing for the expiration of the regulations on December 12, 1991, unless extended by the Board. '' Therefore, an amended ordinance is befose the Board at this time ,`-- for consideration. Also, it is the Planning office understanding, that any application which was not certified as complete as of September 26, 1989, must be reviewed under these .� . new regulations. Viae-Chairman Ross opened the hearing to public comment. There BOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERS 2 DECEHlBER 12,1989 ti� � �. . c`. �yi*,' _ atv:�.�� A:.. �r��. r; . ._..._ _.._- - --_... _._.. _ __ __.. __.. �`3�"`" , _. _ _ __ __ y x. _ t: Y ��j �rF 4 ::::' _. _ ,��,�„�"'r--— ,i . � �-�,�°� :?s"'_-'%.t•`- � . ..4 + _ � ' � �4k�Y'�`4_.t.'` ' i:f�� ' i�"�_ - . "i � * � �•�.5',�� . .{c'' - � ' � . . ...'r�,�'` ;;+c3:':.i'..".: . ;,iw::ii��:'::��y:� '.:1•'�re..i . ``p , _�r�; .:,�1��q[J � . . n.ic;. � . . . I ��:� __ ' ... . . _ �'��` . �T�F�tY ' being none, he closed the public hearing. Commissioner Crowley moved approval of second reading of the Ordinance Amending the Low Impact Subdivision Requlations. Commissioner True seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. �f`` RESOLUTION GRANTING RESUBDIVISION AND PMIi ZONING TO THE OH-BE • JOYFUL SIISDIVISION APPLICATION - MOTION TO APPROVE - PASSED . UNANIMOUSLY- Buddy Lucero, representing the Planning o£fice, ' summarized this item by stating, that the applicant, Dr. Robert '',! - Freeark, is requesting approval of Resubdivision, 1041 Hazard Review, PMH Zoning, and a Caretaker Unit. The purpose of the -� , request is as follows: ;:. - Reconfiguration of three existinq free-market lots; �': - - Relocation and placement of four PMH lots with five homes .4 to five PMH lots with five homes; , - Request for a caretaker unit. '� � ; The Planning and Zoning Commission at their October 17, 1989 ��'�_ meeting recommended approval of the request with conditions with r'.' the exception of the caretaker unit. They recommended denial of •- 4y a caretaker unit because the request does not meet the criteria ;i of the code. Planning staff, finds that the application will not � create any new lots and will develop five PMH lots with four new homes and one existing home to be sold under moderate income � guidelines. Planning staff concurs with the Planning - Commission's recommendation. Therefore, if the Board concurs q staff recommends that the Chairperson sign the resolution. y John Young, representing the applicant, stated that they have agreed to comply with the conditions set down by the Planning and : . .:... . .. :.:. , Zoning Commission and by Staff. There were two things that � needed to be addressed. The first issue was to prove adequaay of `^ water storage for fire fighting protection. He said, that he has met with the Basalt Fire Chief, and they have agreed to install � another 10,000 gallon tank per their request. Therefore, they . • will have two 10,000 gallon tanks to provide adequate water for fire protection. , � � The other issue had to do with the fact, that there is an i existing subdivision which includes two lots across the street. Those two lots do not share the water, access, etc. They were ,`- part of the original ownership of the land but subsequently have been sold off to different owners. Therefore, what they are suggesting, and will have the documentation to support at final '� plat, is that they create a new subdivision that would eliminate those two lots. , He proceeded to review with Commission members their application BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 3 DECENIBER 12,1989 .;?`s';'i;.,� L 4.��:. . „V�1�:.�:. .. �,��',�i"":: .y1.y}.'1- .v. [ �,J �„' �1 _ '_""_... ..._-_._ ., _... .. . . . _.. iri .. ... . . . , ._.. ..._ ... r� $�sF.ti,. . . . . ... . /�._. � .. . , ' � � . i, -�P� :.:�fr t��,il.'�^�:, . .. r f ' ., �':f�:.;:��_y:�:� ' � � . '�e;;:3�..k�� ,,'*:`:�°ti5t,_ . ' _ ( '.:a=;?;;? � � . �"5;F;`'S; � ' . +:Y.��.�,,`�' . � ' � �i��,�'i��::'. . . 'tl.�• ,'�:,��"1'i�I . t� ''xp�,.:(�� .�;';ni�:�.:':4:�!t,�: . >�'_'"ir:.i- . t�� .�,4'r,� r • t^r;�t' ;,ry.c'�:.ST� �. � � . ��. _ .__ i .... _ ,.. ,;., . . . . , �, i ..._,.__..._._ _ .. ..„_....___._ . ..,. _..,, ,, ' �y�:�.;i;� r t,/p;. �:��'.'`,•�'-:;a;: f��.:;;°�: , r�R:�.:=:'_ including a slide show of the proposed development. A written description of his presentation is made a part of this record as Exhibit "A". With regard to the employee units, they would like to construct super energy efficient homes. However, they are slightly more expensive to build. Therefore, they will be asking for a change ' in the Housing Authority's Guidelines to allow for a larger home • to be built to allow for the developer to recoup the expense - associated with any square footage over 1,400 square feet. ?..'��• , �?.r�j1:;i.:: Mr. Youn was advised that he would need to a f`�`- g , pproach the Housing ��• ;:,-. Authority with regard to any changes in the guidelines. Then �<'.:::`' they would forward them to the City of Aspen and the Board for � ` final approval. - � �;. Vice-Chairman Ross asked if the applicant had any problems with the conditions recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. � i 5`�'.. Mr. Young responded by stating, that they do have a problem with �+� ' _ the suggestion of no dogs. if them agreeing to kenneling or �`�::: leashing is not good enough then they would like to be permitted �)•:�. � r•,,:; - ;5 to allow small house dogs. r , . <� Ross opened the hearing to public comment. There being none, he closed the public hearinq. ;�; Commissioner Crowley moved approval of the application approving : the resolution subject to the conditions recommended by staff. � Commissioner Ethridge seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. '.± R&O PARTNERS IAW_IMPACT SUBDIVISION. GF►�AT• SUBMISSION AND 1041 � �� REVIEW - MOTION TO TABLE - PASSED IINANIIiOIISLY - Ellen Sassano, "` representing the Planning Office, summarized this item by �. � stating, that the applicant John olson, is requesting General � Submission approval of a Low Impact Subdivision pursuant to ; Section 4-6 of the Land Use Code to create a subdivision of two ;� lots. A 1041 Review is also being requested, pursuant to Section - ;� 5-400 of the Code. :ti Proposed Lot 2 is bisected by Highway 82 and the Roaring Fork i River. One existing single family dwelling is located north of '�� the highway between the Roaring Fork River and the Lower River � :, Road on Lot 2. Proposed Lot 1 is north of Lower River Road. The t` � applicant wishes to obtain approval for the construction and use - � of a dwelling unit on Lot 1, which is currently vacant. '� jThe case was reviewed before the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 19, 1989. The primary issue discussed at the � meeting was whether the proposed subdivision was low impact in } �, : \.: � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 4 DECEt�ER 12,1989 �+s , ; ��4_ P j . � ,�� 8 ..a...., y:'.��1 I+". ' /� y ;�. w. _.._- - � .�. ,.. ... ._ . ,. ., , ,..a�-` .. � ... _ .. _ ... .. . . . .. . _ . . .._.. .. � ,, � � - ,�: . , . , . ., ... , � .+; �. , �-_.�-r-+^_ ,�..'-'�^_'. .` . �� -; ;.�.. . . `. . . . - . `.t�Y.�. � � - . w:tu=rt��: `>;r , ,c:�;:�:- � �'. :,}.: , ' t . zi'c.'}aA�.:'•c:-:' ' . . :�.':�".e(''.y}� . ':1'—��Y:�;��.'' . �� . �:�:TM:�... ��y::�— .., , +:.'�:ti:..�, . ::��a{#�i�. � • . . :i, �r: ,` � __ _ , . • , .. � - -. . .... . . . . r�.. .......� :� . .. . ..._........ . ... . . _. . . . . , . � .. . � .. . .. . . .;-.�„�� . • �f�,+.�:�:;.<: �_,,,z.�.:�..,.,: t:xa�.':ar. i'��`.'�'1•�4' ,.. nature as it related to wildlife habitat and irrigated lands. The area to the south of the Last Chance Ditch on Lot 1 is currently, and has historically been maintained as an irrigated hay field. All of Lot 1 is located in mapped critical winter range for elk and mule deer. Ar^ development on Lot 1 will have an impact on existing elk and deer use of the area. Should development occur, the Division of Wildlife has recommended that the building envelope be located as far away from the northern _ edge of the lot as possible. While the entire lot is used by the � ��'� - ;G•y'-. elk herd, the norther area is the most heavily used due to its �`:�'��-• .: proximity to the slope and draws behind the property. ��`•- -: s'v�. The • applicant has, subsequent to the Planning and Zoning :r�'! � Commission meeting, proposed to move the building envelope to an �, . another area close to a hayfield. The amended envelope is p., , located to avoid the most critical habitat on site and to avoid encroachment on the irrigated hayfield. Randy Cote, with the Division of Wildlife, has determined that the proposed residence ��' and new building envelope have been sited such that their impact �1.�•.' , on wildlife use of the site will be "insignificant." However, he has said, that any development on this lot will impact the elk C�;' ,, herd to some extent. Further development of Snowmass Canyon, in ` r''•. ;� areas which are specifically used by wildlife, may result in a � cumulative impact on the elk herd which may be irreversible. ` In review of the application, staff had determined, that the site meets the Low Impact Subdivision criteria in terms of bulk and area requirements. However, there is some question as to whether the application meets the intent of the Low Impact Subdivision � regulations. The underlying intention of this regulation is to r aid in the preservation of critical wildlife, agricultural and scenic lands in the Pitkin County down valley area, and to maintain open space. Preservation of these lands is accomplished s - - through the siting of development in areas outside of those lands deemed to be agricultural or wildlife habitat resources. The R&O � Partners' development site {Lot 1) does not include lands which � are outside of mapped critical wildlife areas. As such, the applicant is unable to locate development in an area which does . � not impact the wildlife habitat resource. i , � Planning staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend denial of the request for a Low Impact Subdivision based on the finding that the proposed subdivision is not low impact in nature. The density and visual quality of the proposed t��- subdivision is low impact in nature, but its impact on wildlife lands is not. The Planning Office finds that the application /.`,� does not meet the intent of the Low Impact Subdivision , regulations, which is to preserve both agricultural and wildlife lands. Therefore, the Low Impact Subdivision Growth Management Quota System Exemption is inappropriate for this application. If . the applicant wishes to pursue the additional lot, staff ,xi'' , BOARD OF COiJN'PY COM1�ffSS20NERS 5 DECE!ffiER 12,1989 � ; ,,�`,; .7�. �� ,� 1 � ^"'�-f." -! . �`." -'.r�-; - �: �� - . . . . . . � . �. —' ___ � . . .... ..._. _.. . _ . . . . . � . .. . . . .,�s . . . n E.. -�.,�' . _. . �' , . �•u� .1; ' '."''m4�rss � ''�'s^=1� ' � �- . , . . t.:if.` _- � . '��'�".�',:��_ . . ��..4.�� . ( � .(.- . °.1,:�:r :�.5,.'-'•.,cG.:_ . :.�". ,';�c�: .�.'}'' � . . 1 ±.'f_f�'=' � - _ ' ' y,.:t�3`�� .�..;� � — __._ _ _ ,.� .'_ ,. : . .. �_...__.. . .. - ' • �l?N`.Yk�� . 1�;i�y^:t�:.. 4,i�;� `��f,�+,yc � `. r'^°�..;:,':: � recommends the Growth Management Quota System as the appropriate land use process to follow. John Olson, one of the partners, stated, that since their meeting with the Planning and Zoning Commission, they have substantially altered their request to make the application truly low impact in nature by relocating the building envelope. • With regard to the 1041 hazards, he said that granting of their _ request guarantees that there will never be impact to the - wetlands, the flood plains or the Roaring Fork River on the .��r;5'�::;:;: property. f... ��," : .._ With regard to a fisherman's easement, they have no problem :#'��::-, grantinq it. k` '-' With regard to utilities, there is currently gas, electric and �` ' r�. . telephone on the property. Also, they have proposed a new location for the well to correspond with the new building �'�•� envel ope. ��;.' , With regard to impacts to drainage and erosion, there will be !� +� 1=: none. '� ?" ' There will be no impacts to the road system in the area. There � will be no significant increase of traffic on Lower River Road. The building envelope would border the existing access road for. which permission is granted in their deed for access. The driveway they would be cutting would only involve moving some brush. � With regard to the impact on wildlife, they have moved the proposed building envelope to a site on the property which according to Randy Cote, of the Division of Wildlife, would make � v:-= an insiqnificant impact on wildlife. After the P&Z meeting, he '# had Mr. Cote come out and walk the property, and he said, that ? the most desirable buildinq site would be in the new proposed � location which they are talking about tonight. Also, Mr. Cote said that he approved of the clustering effect of the structures. i Following, the meeting with Mr. Cote, they had Pete Davis, a � Certified Wildlife Biologist, come out and walk the property. He ; „ agreed with Mr. Cote that the impact to wildlife would be � insignificant as stated in his letter. A copy of this is made a � part of this record as Exhibit "B". �°,: , Mr. Olson continued by stating, that the Planning and Zoning Commission said in their meeting, that if he would be willing to ,.� move the building envelope, they would possibly approve the lot split. But during that meeting he was unwilling to do that which was his mistake. His reluctance to do so was due to the fact that the new proposed building envelope was aesthetically much 1� z BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI3SIONERS 6 DECEbSBER 12,1989 ? a,;;; ::k�>:i ',WW:; ..,,'Y,•^'f?'{��'p. ��:. , . ....�' [ . �'. i��.1- ry. A�'��v.._... .—...__ .........: ...... ... _ .... ........... . _ . . . . . . . . ,. � . .._ . . .... . Y � �,. � ��' _" . . .._..��-:.. .. .! � � . �:'' _ . ��lit.— � � - . ..... . s a;::;. ` • . � _,t�i_. `'.�:_`„�' . :��`;- __ � `.'��: , � -_t,'-.,' "- _ . _;,�:,::: :;�;,, :::i;;;,r,qr�' .L''Y��..:.,H-..�5� . . .�i'vx4.��,�� - _ ' ^'i',. , ' . :C�..4�i�. . � . . w:�� :.y,`G�.—�+ ` � . ' - �:`,.;. � .. � . , � ,.. • ��;�:`''�.,:�� xa�: . t,t';;'- ::�.i:;:r._ less desirable. He said, that the P&Z was not against the subdivision of his property or the building of another home for his partner on the property who has half interest in his lot. He also walked the property with Ellen Sassano and she thought the new envelope was a substantial improvement, and sta4•`_3, that the impact to wildlife seemed minimal. She said, that she would speak with Randy Cote again. Based on that conversation, he was advised that planning staff would recommend approval. He only _ found out last Friday that they are back to their original �.�i�; . position. f.,�;:.,�,_ He thinks this emphasizes the fact, that they had a difficult �'' �' time with their decision. The new buildinq envelope is set far �� '-' � enough back from the west side of the property which is F - i predominantly a large depression that a house would not even be f visible from the areas most used by wildlife. The elk herds have increased in the past few years as more homeowners have moved into the area. This is due to the fact, that the valley was � predominantly neg2ected, and has recently been brought back to ti-..' � � life. For example, when they moved into their home last year, - the hayfie2d was nothing but thistles and weeds. The historic � �''� irrigation ditch needed a new head gate, new culverts, and a lot '.C:'•.' ; of heavy machine work. The beautiful hayfields which attract the � elk in the early spring and late winter were almost nonexistent. He said it is odd that these positive efforts could come back to haunt him. Ae believes that his actions in trying to save t Snowmass Canyon as well as his participation in other wildlife concern groups speak for themselves. He wants the Board to feel : comfortable, that he would carry our all of Randy Cote's and Pete � Davis's requests and recommendations concerning dogs, fencing, vegetative changes and visual barriers to the best of his ability ' to truly make the impact to wildlife insignificant. W He summarized by stating, that his property is the last 40 acre �' parcel in the Aspen River Valley Ranch. He presented a list of � all of the homeowners in the valley which reflect this. A copy of this list is made a part of this record as Exhibit "C°_ � � He said when they purchased the property with a partner, it was � �� the only way they could afford to do so. The upper half would belonq to his partner. They could lose their home as well as � create other financial complications if, as a result of the � Board's decision, they are denied their lot split. He asked for � a favorable consideration of his application. ` � ��. i Dave Myler, attorney for the applicant, stated that things have � changed since they met with the Planning Commission. He said, � ' that the Planning Commission was not opposed to the concept of Y dividing the property. They were willing to grant approval for a building envelope that would have been closer to the road. � ' 4 • i�- �.., j BOARD OF COIINTY COMAfISSIONERS 7 DECEMBER 12,1989 ' �u,�' �k... n4;'. x "=_Y��d, C, - -�. � --- _.. .,._.._ .,_.._. � � ',_. . ._.. . . .. ... .. ..._. _ �G � `" . .� -�'-' �+E"',%�' ' � - ' • .'l .�.F _ . _ ' . `t-� "��--��fi„�� _.�{ . � . . .. , . .j:L.� �.` . , . . :l::��-.4L� - jS�T.��.r''r:�- . }'i:� :'F.:%�..�.:,.`h-:�_:' . . . � . ;'l..'..�f'V:. . � ' _ :;: �:��V:."'' . .,.'�«�`S:r ri':�:';)' . ,e,n - ��;. �:ti�. :t � . . :��,.;.`i.'.! . ''��'v.�.� . . ' �^::i:i:,=F"3 � _ . . . _ ._."__'� 11. ..._�._. ...._. . .. . a,� ... ....� .�. ,Ih.t�1j:,' � . �:. • i • )11 f{�Ya'',i,4' ��Zt` k.�; �'r�$:.�',-.11'�. � �v ',;i�'. .`'�i�Si�., - ' Ellen Sassano stated, that the P&Z recommended, that if the building envelope were to be moved, it should be moved closer to the road or down over on Lot 2. And if the applicant had agreed to either of those locations, she thinks they would be eager to recommend approval. However, the new proposed building envelope, ,�-^_while being better in terms of its impact on wildlife, is not in �either of the locations that the P&Z thought were suitable for recommendation of approval in low impact subdivision. She further stated, that if this was a lot split staff probably ;�`�;:�� would not have problems with it. However, the low impact ,;,:: . subdivision exemption procedure may not be the appropriate �, � procedure to follow in this case because it does not appear to be d� - ' low impact in nature in terms of its impact on the wildlife. �i,-,-.-` However, the Planning and Zoning Commission has not seen the }"' relocated envelope. - A discussion ensued with regard to whether the application with the new proposed building envelope should be sent back to the ��;-: Planning and Zoning Commission or whether the Board should take . action at this time. , `'�� ,:��;.; � Amy Margerum, Planning Director, stated, that the Planning Office � : ` �. does not necessarily have a huge problem with this project persa. ' r�'•' � It is a good project. However, they are trying to make a statement on the utilization of the Low Impact Subdivision as a process. She feels it is important to point out, that from the Planning Office's perspective is this the proper process to use for the development when it does have an impact on wildlife. Because the intent of the Low Impact Subdivision was, that it would be a benefit to wildlife, and something that would enhance , the wildlife. Commissioner True stated, that he would like to visit the site -- with Randy Cots�=of the Division of Wildlife. Commissioner Ross opened the hearinq to public comment. Bob Oxenberg stated, that he does not know what statement the Planning Office is trying to make. � � Commissioner Ross closed the public hearing. i � He proceeded to describe, that what the Board is trying to determine at this time, is if this application is properly coming � into Low Impact Subdivision or if it should be goinq through the ;`- Growth Management Competition. The alternatives are to say it is appropriate for the applicant to be here under Low Impact '� Subdivision or that no it is not because the wildlife concerns are in conflict with some of the definitions of the Low Impact , Subdivision guidelines. - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 8 DECEMBER 12,1989 tm�.: >< • t i . �.' �L.;�� . . . ' ��,�7'+y�:. ;.t� . �. ��:.r� �� .. '��: �=,' q.s.,,,� '_'_.....___..�. ._r._..'__._.. .. .._...._..... .__. _. ..... . ......._.. ... . .. ', .... �. ....__ _-..__.._ . `{ _ _ -� � r �`. � t•;r:�.�',;:= -- -��.- � , �'; : ��! A.�:� � .. ."._._ . .:_�...�.��73;• . r ., . "'z;.r.r,__:r .. ��i6r^k,.,4i� ` - T�'4�`Xy':'_ -y. ..C�F:� ( . .�1'j'v� � � . `R^.: i�V'�:��i' , ' .. • . , . ' S:�'Y^.:� , . ''�-Y j..:.�': . � .`�,`'+%� ry t. ��.�i�'�.nk'�T:,3[�:��'� . , iR+,yr,''�'- �::`.ti<��'F'r:.i��. . . :'S`�-".t:r; . � �•:i n . :'v_'�,'b��.� .;:4,�J�.�t�e ,` �► . . . - . ��.�. �._...: �. _ ._�_ . •�`s. ._. . _. .. ._,_..�.... • _.. .. - ...�.. � • `��;�;,�;. �,�., ,� ��:;:..,..:.. i�'�r��,. � Also, a determination needs to be made as to whether the matter should be remanded back to the Planning and Zoning Commission to review the proposed new building envelope, and their information is needed in order to make a finding of whether it should be a Low Impact Subdivision, or whether they should apply under a different plan. Commissioner Ethridge moved to table the matter until January 9, . 1990 pending a site visit by both the Board of County ��• Commissioners and the Planning and Zoning Commission with the new '�-;�'i.� '_ proposed building envelope located on the site, and that the �+;:•:�.:.. ��.;. . Board let the P&Z decide at the site visit whether or not they r.:.4;.' _ i :.. want to see it again. Also, to have Randy Cote present. ti <� � � Commissioner True seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. �.`�'.;�. Herb Klein, representing the Adrianis' neighbors immediately to ` the south of the Oh Be Joyful Ranch, stated, that he did not ' expect this matter to be as early on the agenda as it was, and '�., therefore they missed the hearing. He asked if the Board would consider reopening the public hearing portion to allow them an � � opportunity to comment on the application. . �`` . � A discussion ensued with regard to this request because the I, r'••>'. applicant had left the meeting. It was agreed, that they would � hear Mr. Klein's comments. : � Commissioner Ross reopened the public comment section of the Oh Be Joyful Subdivision application. Mr. Klein stated, that he represents Tina and Mario Adriani who own a 16 acre parcel immediately to the south of oh Be Joyful. ;� Their concern is from an environmental point of view, and the additional density in the open area by the river. It is a pristine triangle of land which has riparian qualities, and a •. -.-very high ground water which could pose a havoc with regard to sewage disposal. With respect to the high ground water they have observed numerous springs both on their property and on the oh Se Joyful property, and they say even now, the existing ditches can't handle the spring runoff. He said, that the visual impacts are also very significant. His , � clients feel that to put more homes there is inappropriate. Balancing this aqainst the employee housing considerations, ' supports their position because there is already existing housing there. He encouraged Board members to ask the applicant to site < the housing a little bit more sensitively, and not destroy the � � beautiful pristine area. �� Scott Smith, caretaker of the Adriani Ranch, stated, that the Adriani's major concerns are environmental. He reiterated Mr. Klein's statements that there certainly is a high ground water problem on the property. BOARD OF COUN'PY COMMISSIONERS 9 DECEt�SBER 12,1989 � '�� v.�. �.,' .r" � �,._,i'�' =: S �� 7. �; .,�-<- _ __ _ . _ _ _.. _ .� . - _.. krT '--�-- .__ - . �i,", i y ...__ -_. .,Fr . .,; i :r�.... . . _�.y..,.�.^a'�"'�"'�,:' . .F.� _: �_.. ::. . ,,,,. . . ,, . ;. � ....-� ._ . .. . .:•._. . ....._.�. __ rilV;".(F-'. . � ..... _=�� . ' '�F�_.�.�.�i�:�. �- - . ;j:�f�.yit•�:�.`» ' ' - .. ..:�l�:.v' � '•4�:.��R:..� . - • IF .��• � ._T: ''„µ�1� . � ..}��';'_'' � � � `'a.. +i L�'-,Y±�`��^ . . . . . - l`r�.. I'r,.`� C.t:+ ! Fy „.-; ;�i�`��`�'i - . .'r'�y'�^. s',S';::J � '(wr,-'-'�� « . � .:,��!:��z:. ,` � . . _._ a>�. .�:,,,. " 4 � , ... . . . , .. . , � 1 . • �``�J{` ,'�' . �'ry�:�y��'� ' �{t1^'"^L,.��.:F,' t:��y�-:. Buddy Lucero stated, that the applicant of the Oh Be Joyful Subdivision will be required to submit a landscaping plan at Detailed Submission. Therefore, there will be a chance to look at the landscaping that is proposed to mitigate the visual impacts on the Adrian:r'. Commissioner Ross closed the public hearing. Commissioner True moved to reopen and reconsider the General ��`c:+,;,.. Submission application submitted by Oh Be Joyful for January 9, 1990. The motion died for a lack of a second. �_�: �� •- ` . AUSTER GENERAL 5IIBMISSION - MOTION TO TABLE - PASSED UNANIMOUSLY �{;::� .:':' - Buddy Lucero, representing the Planning Office, summarized this ��' item by stating, that at the October 24, 1989 Board meeting the application was tabled by Commission members so they could look at the possibility of purchasing the applicant's property. The �.,��;.';' : V. County Attorney requested that Planning staff table the �1.��:; application at this time, so that they may have more time to work "-.�?.:� . with the applicant on the acquisition of the property. ��`.., � ; Commissioner Ross opened the public hearing. �.!'.':,' ,. �: ' Jim Auster stated, that the application was first made in March :� of 1988, and since that time, it has been tabled four times. He feels, that they have met all of the requirements which were put ' on them for approval. He questioned why they have been put through a two year process, and the County is only decidinq at this time, that it wants to buy the property. He further stated, that when the matter was tabled in April, they were told, that when they did get reviewed it would be under the conditions and requirements in effect at that time. At the September tablinq they were told that �gain, and once again •at `' the October tabling. He wants to be assured, that when they do get reviewed it wi1Z not be under new regulations or requirements that might come into effect between now and then. ' - Tim Whitsitt, Assistant County Attorney, stated that the Auster's application has been complete since october, and will be considered under the regulations in effect at that time. �. Commissioner 12oss responded to Mr. Auster's question with regard to trying tc acquire the property by stating, that the ' application could not be reviewed until ownership was proven. { Therefore, an offer could not be made or negotiate to buy the property with tax payers money if the Board was not absolutely �i sure that he was the owner af the property. Commissioner Ross opened the hearing to public comment. � .�., ,•� :� ' BOARD OF COIIN'PY COMPffSSIONERS 10 DECEMBER 12,1989 y : k : {- , ."�.,: :';.';:y ��:�,; �i.� . �i� ;�;. T k �iT�''�kT3. .....:......._...... . ._.._.............. .. .. .. . . . . . ,. �. � . .. . . . .. .... ��y�- .. .,. .... ... .. •-. . . .�f.:�..�r;...". - . . . . � . >. � ;4: . , � -+<`�=_. . � .� �JI t '�'... ' .. ... .��y� f .:. . . k �:f�-�.. _ �,. .. ' . `L.. � �'ji,^ f_9. • ��.". J:Tv:�_ � _ � ' „C>:_ � . ;'l;i • . , . �y 4,I:��-',� .. . . . . '..�i::�� _- � T S q • � . ��Z� JY{+��y � • �/+w)h ;n��Y.:.-T' ,` s . � .___.... _ .�...�.��. - ��__ _-�._ .ry::° .... i�=".F . ..._.._..:--_ ` � .. ..... . . . W�9a,,. .:-,::, . _ ��.S�i��<'�� .�`ii�'y r�'�.,; ��.iiq�"c�;.'.�.:. S'.d.�•.-�r:.: +'jy'.,;�f�.,'';: �°:�;�-.... � Phoebe Ryerson stated, that she feels the Austers' have been treated unfairly. She encouraged Board approval of their application. Bob Oxenberg stated, that if the County is going to condemn the j Auster's property then they should proceed to condemn other property in the Hunter Creek Valley, i.e, McCloskey and Wilkinson. He does not feel it is fair to single one landowner out. ' a;:':.. Mark stated, that open space like Hunter Creek must 'a-��'' be preserved. He feels that once the ground is opened for .3r..�?^``�` development, it will be one right after the other. He asked that ��f�' � • - the Hunter Creek area be preserved. �•:t';°::' �°:' . . Jim Ward stated, that the Austers� have been good caretakers and instrumental in enhancing the Hunter Creek Valley. �{` Terry Butler stated, that Jim and Merrilee Auster have put a lot �•_�: of time and care into the Hunter Creek Valley. However, she , �� feels that personalities have to be removed, and a determination made, that if this application is approved, what will the valley � � up there be opened to. She thinks it is imperative now, since ;,r%.,': ,. the Austers� have proven ownership, that if the Board is not � going to approve their application, the Austers be let know that �� ' as soon as possible so that they can be paid for the land or ' whatever so they can get on with their lives as quickly as possible. Richard Sherman stated, that there are only four properties in Hunter Creek which qualify for development rights. He has used Hunter Creek ever since he has been here. t ' He further stated, that as far as he knows, Pitkin County has never proceeded with condemnation of a property. However, �if they do in this case, the citizens have a right to know where the money is coming from. He said, that if the money is coming from the McCloskey�s, who is intimately involved in the situation, he feels there is clearly a conflict of interest. - Commissioner Ross closed the public hearing. , Commissioner True maved to table the Auster submission to Febl-uary 13, 1990. Commissioner Crowley seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. < p,. RESOLUTION - APPROVING LIND/KOPPEL LOW IMPACT SIIBDIVISION FINAL PT,AT AND PMIi ZONING FOR DEED RESTRICIED EMPLOYEE IAT - MOTION TO �� APPROVE - PASSE UNANIMOIISLY - Buddy LuceTO, representing the Planning Office, stated, that the applicants Barry J. Lind and Allan Koppel are requesting approval for Final Plat review for a \ Low Impact Subdivision and PPII3 Zoning for a Deed Restricted BOARD OF COIINTY COMI�IISSIONERS 11 DECEMSER 12,1989 �'^ ;>�� .s- +�, �'• ;. _��I �f ,��. � �;, ; z. ��,a,c,....._. _._. _----........___._ .. . . . _ . . ..._ _ .. . . .. _..._. . . �. . dy`Y w i .F �`r;;:r�.`.: x�: _ . ' � �_ . ' "'" < 'f. ' .'.' ' ...,,.�4'F �y�' ' .'�_y,V�ti=, . Y . � _�..� . ",L.� �iGl:.`S..cG:. . . ::• _�C^:i;.:`_ � . . ,'3`:,'' . � . r'"�;� - � . �'-1'•z . . . ..C-:ds��::i,:r�.:: . � . . . '�iK.� .�::. . . •.z.t..;y ,.< :�s:J"..,d�; �,:;'rp;#r;:�;`.%,r - ��.��r"'�'irf'' �:r��. 'd�,�� . . e:},� - ', . . -_.__._� ___ �:iw_. �. - �-� r ��;::: ha,•,,,::,;.:, f•,�'ri31�-y',T��. Employee lot with an existing house. On July 25, 1989, the Board granted General Submission approval for the Lind/Kcppel Low Impact Subdivision to subdivide a parcel of land into two free- market lots requiring the deed restriction of seventy-five acres. The property is approximately 113 acres, zoned RS�`�0 PUD and is located in the Snowmass Creek valley adjacent to Watson Divide. At the Board meeting of July 25, Commission members and staff , encouraqed the applican� to zone the existing residence to a PMH lot/unit instead of demolishing the residence. The applicant has �":;" - stated, that they do not want to have it as a lot, but rather to `°"''�� ;�,,.';:-;.., . keep it as a caretaker unit. Therefore, this will be a final �. � plat for Low Impact Subdivision and a caretaker unit, and the ;�.� , ... resolution will be amended to indicate this. �'* ~':: r Commissioner Etrhidge stated, that he feels that the resolution � being amended to a caretaker unit rather than an employee lot is a substantial change to previous approvals. . �� ' Gideon Kaufman, attorney for the applicant, responded by stating, ;�.��`: ; that they would like to maintain the unit as a unit for the � � person who maintains the ranch operation. If they are obligated ,:`.1;'> � to se11 it, and then the person decides he does not want to work ; r..�. ,_ on the ranch anymore, they have not accomplished what they are . �: lookinq for because the whole purpose was to have someone who could maintain the ranch. They would be willing to turn it into � a PMH lot if they could rent it but they do not wan�t to sell if for that reason. � Commissioner True moved approval of the resolution as amended. :� Commissioner Crowley seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. � FIRST READING AND SET FOR P[TBLIC HEARING PLANN'ING OFFTCE FEE � SCHEDIILE - MOTION TO APPROVE - pASS D iJNAlIIMOUSLY - Amy Margerum, Planning Director, summarized this item by stating, that the ` ;� Planning Office recommends adoption of this resolution amendinq � the fee schedule for land use applications. ; Resolution No. 86-138 established the land use application fees for 1989. This r�solution calls for the fee structure to be - � reviewed annually during the budget hearing process and if ' changes are made, a resolution be adopted to take effect on � � January lst. At the budget meeting on November 14, 1989, the t " Board approved a proposal for revision of the fee schedule. ? In reviewing Plattning office functions it became apparent that `t� the average number of hours per case, as reflected in the existing fee structure, are low. Staff is actually spending more `�! time per case than the initial deposits reflect. Therefore, they are proposing to increase the number of hours per case included in the base fee, or deposit. In addition, they are proposing to •� ;�> lower the billing rate to $130 per hour across the board, both ;:..: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 12 DECEMBER 12�1989 t � �� ... ..-.. �'.��,.,h�N�' . . �.�(''� �' r:.� _ �. ��, . . . .._.. ....___._. .. .. . . . - . . . . ., _ ..' �-. .. ... . . .. � r� � � �F } � '�� - . j �.:� • , � �....� _ ��t.i r.1_� � ` � ' ., '`�:�rei`,i�: . • . . - ,j::t.':r I_;;fi`,;, . ' _ . � . '. _,,,y:- . � . , . .x �:-. � . � . . . i � �' . _i:::��.: - y '`-'Su".�'.%..i;: t�fa:�:t��:� . ::i.:;{.; . .n.s_+.. ��fy7;._'•: ` . . ' K!��'k: ;;;:r:x � �� t s :.., f '�� . . .. :.-.., .f�� ._,.. ' . ...- . _ . . . .��.-. . . . � , f_�;r':�r,�,� . �/��`,, ��;":�'��; .. for the initial. deposit and additional hours. Currently, the County charges $145 per hour and the City charges $135 per hour with additional nours billed at $85 per hour. Staff finds no justification f.- charging a lower rate for those conplex and controversial pr:,j:.�cts which may take longer than the average �� amount of time to pcocess. Also, they feel that the hourly rate r_ .x, for the County ar.d the City should be consistent. Therefore, , they are adjusting the City hourly rate to $130 as well. In addition, they have added to the guidelines established for - the administration of fees, a clause which allows the Board the ;}:;�;;>:�;,_. option of retaining special expextise in reviewing permit i.,r.... applications and for those costs to be borne by the applicant. �}�`� �. :�,:. If this fee schedule is adopted, staff estimates that it will �. _ increase revenues by approximately 25 to 35� in the amount of � approximately $35,000. She said, that it should be noted, that '�' '. this estimate of increased revenues is dependent upon the same �� level of activity as they have processed this past year. ��•"•'. :t<,� . Commissioner Ethridqe moved approval of first reading of the resolution and set for second reading and puhlic hearing on :`� ' January 9, 1990_ Commissioner True seconded, and the motion ; r••` passed unanimously. �: ' RESOLIITSON APPROVING THE CONTRACT AGRFEMENT BETWEEN THE ASPEN CHAMBER RESORT ASSOCIATION AND PITICIN COIINTY FOR GUEST SEI2VICES AT AIR RT - MOTION TO APPROVE - PASSED IINALTIMOUSLY RESOLIITTON APPROVI2iG TEH USE AND LICEI3SE AGREEMENT BETWEEN PITRIN PORTAGE INC AND PITKIN COUNTY TO PROVIDE SRYCAP TO ASPEN PITKIN COONTY AIRPORT - MoTION TO APPROVE - Brad Christopher, Airport Manager, summarized this item by stating, that on December il, 1989, the Board approved first reading of the Pitkin Portage, Inc. Cont�act Agreement with Pitkin County for baggage handling and "skycap" services. The term of the agreement is from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 1992; three years. In exchange for offering their services for hire on the airport, Pitkin Portage, Inc. agrees to pay the County $3,000 per year. � ' - Commissioner Crowley moved a�proval of the resolution approving a , contract with Pitkin Portage, Inc. Commissioner Ethridge seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC FiEARING - 12ESOI�JTION APPROVIKG TEIE � CONTRACT ACREEMEtiT BETS7EEN TIiE ASPF.ti CEiAMBER RESORT SOCIATTON '�• AND PITRIN COUNTY FOR GUEST SERVICES AT TIiE ASPEN-PIfiICIN COUNTY � �; ArRPORT MOTION TO APPR�VE PASSED UNANIMOUSLY - Brad Christopher summarized this item by statinq, that on December li, 1989, the Soard approved on first reading, the Aspen Chamber Resort Association Contract Agreement with Pitkin County for Airport Guest Services. The County is obligated to pay $46,000 � ; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 13 DECE2�ffiER 12,1989 �'°' : ':� � `Li; `j2; �� . .'{�:y,�;�.yir:�: J,. .?•�i:;"; , �<�:�w,r".: ?� � , -. : �: �p�fa,,, .._._ : .__.. .. . .. _ .. . . . . � /T . . _ __... .. , :� �« �� ... ' _�^.-�.- . . . �,, -.'� -'-�..,�,�+� � -M` . . ... ' .. . . ,`i?✓s:*. ' ��' ;y;,'. ' _y`, .`3.'� � .'��,�_"' . :,L iw.;:<!f^µ'�:;'�� . .;%4.1 � �.{��.'�:,' �.",�:te:_ , . . ��=r ,� '� • . ' ;��,<:• .�: � _ . . .. . ,. • �;,i�.,�r,.�'�. �'",��;`•. �;�V:Z:�ki��', for its portion of the Guest Services program un3er the terms of the contract. The agreement covers the 1989/40 ski season, and expires on April l0, 1990. The aqreement has been approved as to form, and budget by Pitkin County staff. Commissioner True moved approval of the resolution apprwinq the contract aqreement with the Aspen Chamber Resort Association. Commission Crowley seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. SECOND �AAING AND FINAL ADOPTION - RESOLDTION DETERMINING THAT - _ ;:•:.,i•, THE PUBLIC ACQIIISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IS APPROPRIATE AND .yW�;.c:'s;� DIRECTING ACTION `�'O IINDERTAKE SUCH ACQIIISITION OF H[JMMINGSIRD �' ++'�'�''- LOAD - MOTION TO APPROVE - PASSED IINANIMOIISLY ^ Tim Whitsltt "�i�,'" '-'" Assistant County Manager, summarized this item by stating, that :�iT�= �� at the public meeting of October 24, 1989, the Board tabled the General Submission application of Jim and Merrilee Auster L; � regarding their proposed residential development upon the ��=. . Hummingbird Lode. The basis for the tabling was for further i` review and consideration of the possibility of acquisition of r�,��`�-• that property by the County. �� r:;1i• . Upon review, it appears to staff, that there is no legal 4,.�,; impediment to the acquisition of this property by the County, '�� Y:". either by negotiated purchase or through proceedings in eminent � r�' domain. Therefore, staff has drafted for the approval of the • Board a formal resolution finding that such acquisition is appropriate and in the interests of the County and directing staff to proceed with all necessary and proper activities to accomplish the acquisition. Jim Auster proceeded to read a written statement with regard to this matter. A copy of this statement is made a part of this record as Exhibit °D°. 4 Commissioner Ross opened the hearing to public comment. Bob Oxenberg reiterated riis previous statement, that the Austers' should not be singled out for purchase or condemnation in Hunter Creek when there are others out there such as Wilkinson and the McCloskeys. He feels that other properties in the area should be � considered. It is not right to go after one individual landowner. Commissioner Ross responded by stating, that in order to negotiate to acquire a piece of land either by negotiation or by � use of eminent domain, staff has to get appraisals, has to make i' expenditures, and directed by the Board to spend staff time. If they did this for the wilkinson property, the McCloskey property, - etc., the Board would have to officially direct staff to do so. E By approving this resolution it does not mean this will be the oniy property that they would consider doing this way. But � �': ' again, in order for the staff to begin to negotiate and try to BOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERS 14 DECEP�ER 12,1989 �x " .. " 4; ` w'� . - . . '��:',`�-1'�. . .�. � ��:�,c.e:.• ,.._�. _ .._._.. _. . . .. . .. .._. � 1 . . . ... ..,. Y. .., - ._ ..._ .... . ._. . . . ... .... . f, . .::� 2 . � �`±:' ' � ._. �� . . 1�,,�.- • �__ . � K �"C'' . ` � . . " —fc:.::,'LA._� ._ �.`i6.-�`=::';'i . . �-J'.�''�-.4=� . tie.^ ' - f , . . .'.i: � . . . �,'!�{:�" _ . . . . . �,.,y...y�' . _ . . �� t � �;.1,',1 . •.•�-fn;�C._•��'..' . . .:J.. ,.'r:5..li�� ' . �.Ft,n.:.., ' . a��l,} .g"T � r/ �_: • , .. � i�� YS:� � - ' i,�,�`•,,:: ,,� .,.,__. ��;,yy;;.: ��. ; arrive at a price to see if there were any possibility of ' acquiring land in this manner, they would need official direction from the Board. ' Oxenberg continued by stating, that if any property is to be + considered for purchasc'"then the Soard should consider doing it as a whole and include the other properties in the area. He doas not feel a piece meal acquisition is riqht. � Richard Shezman stated, that he flatly opposes what the Board is �'_�.;'" _ doing. He thinks there is a pattern of harassment to the Auster -�:;�°::• � ;�:';:?:,C.:.: family. Also, he feels it is a bad precedent for the County to .,f,` .. adversely attempt to take away the property of property owners. ;�'; ;; ,�.:- He further stated, that he feels the first portion of the ` � : resolution with regard to negotiating a purchase of the Auster's ' property is appropriate. However, he does not feel that purchase •- • or condemnation of the property in the same resolution is {}, appropriate, and is absolutely excessive. "1�'`� ii::``".:. . He reiterated his previous comment, that the citizens have the righC to know where the money for purchase is going to come from, ;� >. � and if it is coming from Tom McCloskey. Also, he would like to ; ri;;>: know the status of the road issue involving the McCloskey . ; property. a' Commissioner Ross responded by stating, that with regard to the road issue, and what the County is doing in pursuing the prohlem .+ of where Mr. McCloskey's house is sitting, he should contact the County legal department to be filled in on the details of the suit, which they are pursuinq with all vigor through the courts. 4 �; He further stated, that the County has received no offers, has had no discussions, and have no intentions of using anybody's private money for purchase of open spac°e. However, the Parks � Association has mentioned to the County, that they would like to � y make an offer to the Austers' for tYxeir property. j Bill Mohrman stated, that at one time (in the 1930's) the County � did own the property. Therefore, ittdividual landowners up there � bought the property fair and square, and he Yeels they should be � able to retain possession and their riqhts to own the property. � �i. ?� Jim Ward voiced his objection to purchase and condemnation being part of the same resolution. � :� t,. i � Commissioner Czowley stated, that he was on the Auster's side until approximately six weeks ago when they were talking about .�� restriction of house size on the land in perpetuity. At that ' time, Mrs. Auster said no not in perpetuity as long as the Austers live there. Therefore, it looked to him as just another � . multi-million dollar lot in the Hunter Creek valley. BOARD �F COIINTY COMMISSIONERS 15 DECEMBER 12,1989 '`x � 4��, -:7i�Y::�. ;'!�9 '.�'.IYY�l�- •sru (;; i. U ' • ...___... _. .... .._. ..... . . . . .. .._... .... . , . .. ^ '• .2�^t,'a:� . . . .. . � � � � . . . r�-. �. . :��: . �i� . . '�� . _'y'::. yY2' • ,. , ' `!�:.;{� . � . . .._ ...r.�_� — . . '.54:'.,".':;:s' � . ��.'J-.Fr":C:; �'.'.''y':^..�:.... , ( � y�� . . . '.:.tia'" � � . ��:("i�t;!..''v:'. ' . ' . ':r`:;r+:i. ��:i�;'z.:4�i.�,�} . . s"�.-± ' ,N�n:.ti`�:_•N:°; -};n': ,,;'� .`'tY)�y��-✓u • . " �'iy��,wi.�. '� Cn.p.� ` . . '}Y y � � : ...., . .. _. ,. ........-�.. .. .., . �..... �. .:: . . . . . �_.. . �' . � ... : �.... �.bG .. �...�: . � ....:.. .. .:.... .. . . . :� . . ". . ;Sl`� .. . �5 y�,�Y' • ��..,,ti�k f�..�°,; _ �°'`•=�'I:,. Mr. Auster responded by stating, that the reason they withdrew that offer is because they heard prior to the public hearing, that the County was going to pursue condemnation even if they had deed restricted. I Commissioner Ross closed the hearing to public comment. .:..:j`_ Commissioner Crowley moved approval of the resolution on second '..;.; - reading. Co�issioner True seconded", and the motion passed 'a>:::: unanimously. '�,�3•.`'." ,•:��:. r.. �ECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION SUMMI,RIZTNG :�!�":�'; P�:�NUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR EACH F[1ND AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR =�� PITKITT �OUNTY COLORADO FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1990 - MOTION TO �'�� APPROVE - PASSED UNANIMOUSLY ��" ' SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - RF'SOLUTION APPROPRIATING SUMS '�;'`'"' nF MONEY TO THE VARIOUS FUNDS IN TE�E AMOUNTS AND PURPO5ES AS SET �4::,,'."', , FORTH BEIAW FOR TI� PITKIN COIINTX COIARIlDO 1990 BUDGET YEP�R- �r''} MOTION TO APPROVE - PASSED UNANIMOUSLY `�''` .�'l..>. ;. r•�� SECONA READTNG AND P[TBLIC IIEARING - RESOLUTION LEVYIt3G 6ENERAL • " PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE YEAR 1989 TO HELP DEFRAY THE COSTS OF �s� GOVERI324ENT FOR THE COUNTY OF PZTKIN COLORADO AND ITS SPECIAL F `' DISTRTCT FOR THE 1990 BUDGET YEAR - MOTION TO APPROVE - PASSED UNANIMOUSLY Lynn Dunlop, Budget Director, summarized this item by stating, that these resolutions were approved at first reading on November 28, 1989 and are before the Board at this time for second reading and public hearinq. The resolutions symbolize the culmination of �� 1 ' the 1990 budget process. _. Commissioner Ross bpened the hearing to public comment. There being none, he closed the public hearing. Commissioner Crowley moved approval of second reading of the three resolutions. Co�issioner True seconded, and the motion � passed unanimously. XDJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m. R ectfully submit , � . l' ci,[�— �`-- , '`: - _ .� eanette Jones Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners � S f i ti� O OIINTY COMMISSIONERS 16 DECEPffiER 12,1989 �": ��<=%+ BOARD F C ��. i�.�_ �:.��,. ��.'YS:�.i'.y A:: `` :.�.ij�` : ',.57,.;'.::j�''«. � . - .,�i.�„�� r; . . , � -. . . ._..._... _ ._._...__.. . , _ ._.... . _.__ .._ ...... l..-_. . ... . .. . ... . _ .. . ... _ .__ . .. .� �.. � �., .._ - . . . � . . i� � . � �:... �•: '� .-'.�:':F''4 . ..-. , .. }�;t:..i'+_�"^,k4� .. . • . �:�?'.f'.,2i3L.rfi . . `:S;"::. .r.-�. _ � �-:f�;' • -. .. .. +.,�'.i� ' .. . � � . �,�:y'AA:.;: . . . . , . , 'SX�,\;•:,�•J- , . ��3..b'<;�a':,; , �.��i'fyi;i'+: {.:;�h'��:. , �.R.:�� .. - ' r. . �� ` + . • . ��:.;�-� :.�r:�'. ___ i s •. �.�,�r. , , 3�.°":.. ... . ._............ . ...._,...._. _ ._ .._.�._....-_..- .. . , . . . .. _ . . ._ . . �- �. �;�;��=�;'; ' • BOARD OF CD.CO�M1!�I'R'S �_��y i', ' • � PITICIN GOl!P7TY v;s'<eF''" B. Appiication Summary and Description Public Hearin�[xitiniis �'�`-".`�{:':' Q2te:. /2�/l-8 1. Annlicado� n Summuy ' gt��;r�ct:0 - £- � d !! Exh. Flo. ___._ This is an application for a subscanrial amendment to an exisdng plat. It -- comprises reconfiguration of three ireemarket lots to conform to the exisdng zoning of AF-1 and RS-30. In addition,PMFi zoning is requested for 2.7 acres - containing foar single family homes,an employee unit and a PMFi caretakers �'=��.•,;;' �- unit. Four employee units are relocated to tots. A fifth employee unit wilt be ..#'-'��%�.°=: €� located in the main house as will the caretakers unit. ��" r� s;.,.;� S5%: , I : 2. Descrinrion t ..The intent of the development proposal is to improve a portion of thc Oh-Be- �� Joyful Subdivision,aesthetically and funerionally. ��1�'� ' ' €1 ,. z. . Three freemazket lots of approximately 15.22 acies,12.6 acres and 25.8 acres ` ��'•,' , ; . � respecdvely are proposed i � _ � Each contains a spec�rd building envelope of 0.9 to 1.00 acre in which consuucrion may occur. 'These are located beneath[he Stewan irrigation ditch ac - - `i the base of the moun�in slope at the upper edge of che pasture. ;j . In addirion,four PMfi homes will be clustered close to Snowmass C�eek and one '-; unit will be Lacated in the existing main house with a caretakers uniG The loa average 9,400 sf to 16,000 sf and each has a specified building envelope. Other than the main house,all the existing structw�s will be removed 'T'he site � �; will be cleared and revegetated where necessary. The overall landscape concept � is to create a condguous pasture framed by cottonwood�ees. � Access to the freemarket uniu is from the exisdng entra�ce to the groperty. New . ;��" access wilt be constructcd to the PMH unics. �. C �= f' � `. ��'l 1 ti � .,7 � �'� I'v� 'fY ..:...:....� .... .. s ':.'�.. ..._..__'_.__'__....�..�._.`...:..«c�....�..✓..�. � � . .. . .. :... . �"��.�_..... .:...,',... .'..:.��- , :........ . . . -' ..a�` ', . 4�.:_.�.. . . . � . . k �Y �j a�'�' �..._ .. T��--- .. � ':x' . � .u.te :. � ei , `4j .�iY-'� � • - . ....... .�.. . ,��.. :�_-. . . _ � �' � . ' y �..T!�' ._ r4 yr,�.: ' ' , �� ..L•� .. ' . . r„tr.:+�`--. � � . . t�l��::. . �'�5��^±:xL.'� . . . .JY;;� �:�?�� ` � �tN " • ' t �.y y��r�.; . . ' . . � ��' ;; ' . ' . • . . _ -t,,, i �w�.: . �,r, . .��"? �,.�':.� :;�,�;«;. :yi�.:•`.1�--< � ' . . .��w�y�S ' . r. ''��°r�`—,% ` � . . - - ,ez':;^t _.___,._..�___ l.N1h' �'. . , ,� . ._._......._. __. -. ,.....-..._......_ . ...� ... . . . .. .. . .. ...-.� ,. . - .. .. .. . . . . _.._ . . .;_.. 1' t . � � �� t, . . �. � ��.t�,. � � � ��'��.�': � Overhead power and telephone transmission lines a-averse the site at the base of the mountain. Power and telephone lines to the proposed freemarket and PMH housing will tap this sowce but will be laid underground to all facilides. 3. Program Summar� �- Fnemarket Lots '::i; - : Lot 1 =15.22 acres Construction = 0.9 acre �� ; Envelope Y�, f _._ Lot 2 =12.6 acres " = 0.9 acre �t:';•::`;�' Lot 3 =25.8 acres " = 1 acre ' Snbtotni 53.62 acces t t�; PMH Lots =,��: ti;: `:. Lot 1 =16,000 sf ,� Lot 2 = 9,400 sf , :�'• r•• � Lot 3 =14,800 sf • - � Lot 4 = 9,900 sf •i Common Atea =62,600 sf ' PMH unit and =I5,000 sf � Cantakers unit � Subtotal =127.500 sf or 2.9 acres � �, Total =56.52 acres G Site Vicinity and Characteristics � This applicadon is for the area of land defined as Oh-Be-Joyful Subdivision-lots 3,5,6,7,8,9 and 1�of secuon 34,Townships$5,Range 86W,a total of 56.52 actes. The site is bounded by Snowmass Creek Road,Snowmass Cx�ek,BLM land and two I� � neighboring lots wirh homesices. ;`<.. :,.:, � � The existing plat(see Sheet 1)for this site is for tfu�ee freemarket lots and four PMH lou, } one of which contains a duplex. Therefore,there are 5 exisring PMH units total. f � ; �. !�t;._', : '�'k� �. _y..-.,;,.' �� _ ° - 2 �,, f � ..., y, . . , .__.__,___ .. � "^'�' , .------ ��.__._..._....�.._�___.__��._ ._ . . .. ,—. y , ___- - ,. � �.� __..__ : rr ,�.�r . � . ,. : .._ ..t��t�..: . � .,_. .. � � _- � M f �wyi�- � _ ' ��G i�#'�4::, ' . � �."�-"� � . o.'*�s3`�'�,�'�:t. . — y�' "-;��;' ~ , — - _ • *,';,.-..._ . ,Yr�. `%�,: 'ira-ay��. . .. �� . . � - - . . ��%�?'�'.eF'� . . � � ' ..•�:Y:y�rS��_ ' � � - < 1 7^ �¢�_�.��. .. .. . . � �. � . �'��ry�. . . .. ... _ . . f� `fy'N-J ' . . .?��}, � . . � ,kL:.ti :x 1+�.�4�`� � ' � � � . � � �ak,. .�= ` . �:i:�.�.:�, - - . . � � _ . ', �<:. .. , , ... _. _ . _ _ _.;�-....._ _ _ . . . . .. __ ._..___._�_...,__ __..... .. ..... .. .. '::. • ' ,� . `�.i��. �: . �� .,��;.��a: �a t,�iv,�. ;_.. - . F �a;;.. ' , � i'�ti..:: ,: . The site is zoned approximately 23 1!2 acres of AF-1 and 33 acres of RS-30. The p�sent loc configuradon is non conforming. There is one acccss drive to the development from Snowmass Creek Road The major �, structures-a honse,a barn wich a dwelling unit above,two free standing dwelling unia and a duQlex,are located as shown in Sheet 2,Sice Analysis. Other seruct�res on site include wells,sheds and iubble heaps. A power line traverses[he site. ��:,:;:••- :� .�d:!, .. `Tyj�,yl+:: Physically,the site is divided into agricultural/buildable land and unbuildable mountain ."�°,��-�%-� .,.. stuub vegecated slopes,by the SYewart urigadon ditch at?,480 feet elevation. A number - � of Cotronwood and Spruce uees grow alo�g the river bank and around the main house. , Urilides to che site(telephone and electriciry)are supplied by local companies. The . _ potable water supply is from welis and irrigarion ditches supply the pastures. Sewage N f disposal is by means of sepdc systems. 4�;;..`" �,5 r,fp:,�''. F''. .: r ' , � � � '�S r! �� ;� ,t • ' � :j :j . }` �;� i . '�: '; t-�. � i :1 . Y. •'._'l' a 4,-. tf �w'-� ' . '±ft.:. ' �� ,. :W�";' ��''. . � `r��>:y: `i 3 :; � —___-____.�.__._. -- -.. . _____..._,.� ��'�-.. . _ _ _.....r..._-_.._-----_-_�__— ��+-�'- .� 's, ._.f.�, r � c� ��Y.� �.. j_yr-/. ��e��.� . .. . . � ,�• �' : � , . -- <�p_:� __ . . s'�,�.��fiv> � . . �. .. � - � . N*',�;� �-�;;,. , �� "' . , ��« . �� ,,�, , �?s k-:�?�: .. _.�:��'z. _ . . . _ . ::�'t�„�~ ,r�r= � ;��' . �.k�'"�r�� (;,�,� '' ` • . .�.,�, � _ "'�:,. . . ,�.. .. ._.._ � ; . . _ . _ :...:__ —}, '-..r ' ._. , 5..,,..,•-;;;, ( , _ _ ►�� , �.� '/�r`�J''�.•`;• � i:�,�r�:.: � yr*r' � ':Ii: . , ' t`�a{�,��.,�t'., , ��.�t,`,- . � �e.... �..�« ; , . �" s '; �: _ `�: ii ; �� ,.,.., i�.�� E — "" ' ' , ....t,.:�-: _ ,�y� 1- . ..C_ '__'� ' � � . � ' '� K5•+' • � -- .e„ � , �M...��- . '. �,r- wo.. a .. pai--_ .:•"i,\`_- '``. ...r � � , �;t:� - �... i::".'� / .� \ �ai .tii » ....� ` ....^y�_•� ,: � Y , . �... ..« .i . � � �', �. �,;, . . � ,�� f:�.-. � .. .� -• •� ""'" i.',�yT,:'.��t?.. � /. rY �:�`�� 1 ' E X I S T I N G P L A T �� :•�. SGMP 1:20P�0' N :.��,��".�'. �1� , ' . i �, �.. _ _ �,� p� .:, � t��`'""�� . _ - �, _ .;� �� ^ ,�.; � � r . . .;r.�� '��,`�`i. ;; - `� =�� ' V 1 C 1 N I T Y M A P � SLKE:1%2000'-0 X ` ,4.. ,.� . ' �`°"""" ' OH BE JOYFUL � a� � �� asbieW�u�[�SM�D � 1 M,.E..w.:� SUBDIVISION `t, '`"0E16"^'O'^""01' DES[CN910RES80P.II7C. t6� � • �sa� sc...o.a.u.c. ��i� •-�E:c �.wt ��E� >��[�Sl PY��Mf flllFlt �•y' • --_ 7epo�qnc5�+�elaflrt]WIa3Nrv10N0�MMYM1�M�S+uWr �WEyrO00SnwGS. �SILw CO10�100��{1� ti. .'�'";�s. °fO�n T]Sill.SmonN.T.�S_LKM'.tlb�Y1.14.M�Gw1.�d^ co�0�DO �� l ,��j�..�: .i�fEND�tENT TO EXISTING PLAT '• �''—�.� .....�� . ' � l.' � . � r. . '_ T'__ � �.(��.' ... ._.__ _.,,..,....... ., - ._:.��........ ...... .. ... ... �_ .. � ...y� :_ . . . ,. .... .. _. ..... .: _.:....� ... . . .... ..... .._.. :. '•y�{.�� :: � � �f• �4 1 T+. ' . _ . -+r tt'�a�., . . � ..�i�J' .. �� Is��. " . . . . � , ! �_�_,� � ir��. _ ` s �^(� � a.- � .:"��h'17�3=: .... - � - ". � 1 t' ��.. pi,�'��..,��„ , . �'.'k< �' .,_t.,;a.,�.; ��,`,;.,��-�` � � ':�c�,�`'ua�w`� - '.. . 1;+-�,.,,. Z.,1 . m�y. .<��.` . . . � .. � i4 .'�r� ' .r,��'6e. x��S � • ,�,��'�� '� � �.� �. �.= : :�i: �: �_ .. , ._..... ;_.. _ . . . �. -(""�� j,;��:_:.,._ _ � (�� y�`'�':i`'� . �.. _ *• . . • � Q it, N.�°� , -.' ., . S ! ' ��i�� ....--, .. -.. o ao so tio uo aoo ��- '.SE�(ifL�� 1 � . �� , M � - :r �: . < •�� k: ��'�� . i. G � .�'NEM IOA� �� - � • � CONSTIIUCTION l � • ERSEYEMi 1111116A iEY � �f00' ��N O S ' Y 7ETB�CK /��MA K O• � • � `� t Y 1 % �� _ _:.:.r U �J I ' _ �' � O � f� o �^ �rni��er�ccess � � EXCELLE T. �C c , + ,� � v�Ews 6� 0, s ,J�f'r�.. �"i i �.1.1�� O . ; �t �' t , \ �T • ' ' ' � . o r � , .,;;;.. _ : ' ' � ' ~ �(' ; ��`, t;"�. ; � . -o o� �{� , I ' � € ; 4 � t `�• \f a 4' .F-�:.��: .'o +wx � ,� �o ' r�`':.i�.;� .. � l:; `.l:' .♦� Q� � . . � ' I. - . � `�Y� � Vs e� `r.. T •� 5 . .. ►rn� � `` 1'•_ . � Q° ' ,'` . , � _ _ �' • � p� �e . �- SECON0411T ACCE$3 " _ �W t , 1 0� 1 yN ' N� � 2 � �j i, , f 1 / i 4 RVIlWl� �' 9 ' •/ 1 � 'x� ° I�F1 y ` OQ � , � , /� � ' �� 23 ACRESS l�'�� . _.. '; .._..c�+'_..�_.._._ .�[i.. Or� � / • •� � .M�IN NO051 � ~ ' � ��a�0 � � RS�BO �'� � � p �� .� . . � n �'�: � „ }' 3<ACHESY = ;Q` . O'\'�'•Q� 4 - �� 4 ..�" � f`' ti� � � . � • � 0 ..�._ �'� r ' +� a . � .. f' �� i 10'SETBIICK '� . �` '' � _� 1. I � �`—"' 1 11 R 1 6 A T E O L�� = Y (C91 MMPrN'{I �L / We ` i Q$ 1 � ° Y � r .�. t-t, � a � p � '\ - E�ICELLENY�` � �'l - r ro pi. VIEWS ; �i �ri �M �,_��_ - 4 \ ��__ . '�' O ��. — � _ �— 30'SETS�CK E F 1 I.M G o 1 T C M E S _ . • � _ �'___ ' ' . t ', �- " ... .. � 0 , ! . 1 i: _ . „E�,..�..E, . O H B E J O Y F U L ' •o.`:".E,... . .�.�.. , 2 '°°�::>:: �- �� SUBDIVISION �� L��1'/ �= - '°.� SITEANALYSIS ""`"`°°�""'°" GS[GNROi1r.SH0P.[NC. ,c M-o.,....�. „�..:`. c. co..o..no :ro ns�ou•,��s�•�n �`§.;�.•J _ '_ l�oePV�a.n�rWlal�.OWanw�OdtYk.h�INAanSU�idr •�caa�.x.vfwG .SrE• CO��OO l�l�� -�• � 'GIEn[O�O��GT. :. ":��:. ueu�e• T lSl�l.3a N.TJS..�.Mw.efur�nfM.Mlnf)-Cdstlo C4+Lt �+'b��:' � � _ "0' � AAIENDAtENT TO Ea1STING PLwT ••°' "" r :{t� . �� y''��T�.' . 4��: �_� . _..... ... . . . . . . . .. . . . � . ., � , - , .. � . � �.F •F� � -. __�".__ .r f'i l . � • : �,� -. ,`�f: _�.:+:- . � .. •.'i,tr.':;;.r._<.-.: - . • :"i"�: , ' ,cSc',,;';ti.. . c�'/.r:': a'.�,`,},..,:�' . , . . ` � ,� _ ____ _ . '�� . :. ..,,. � _. __ _,._.._.. ..�_,: _ _.._... ... _ _:_._.__..-- � . , ,� � _. (" ��- . ( ��y��YV,:.. . � ` \ • • ' . �,=��j��s•`;i:: ,..� •.\ °��i:� - }.,,.;-; � IZ+^.�'--1 � ��9�.�,�� o ao so uo ��o 000 .��;r..�— ' i � :i {i :i e� f i ,_ . . � .. . .. \ ��o�� .� • � ��I��` q s 6 ...... .R: �: � �i;� ��,.: :_':�:: �o., r;;W �..,,:,:;._. �5.::.a.. ,__ •�:�,�'• \ ej t.s:F::�,'.': � i '_ \ ri � �,�,�-r.. �� \' �'-'.`�. \ j i �: � . . � . ► - iJ��l=� fl . �, �; . ., �- - - �e e��„e % . `,; .e �v � ��J / �� ` 1 0 � � ,. � �! Il � '' . �'1/ . � I I � ��I '��.,r�a i.i.r.�� '�� , .\ �� - ,� ; l 1 '` � � � , ,,,�� }� � ,, ,; .- �� ' ��, �.'�:+� ��• � � � .� i � i' � ,�, _ , � �, �r��, � - �- �-,�� , �„F , r , �, � a J;I ;�, '� ,�/%/ i;;� � ��' a / ,`�. . �„ � ��;,,� . �lp I . • �—:j � ;/e \\,``: � �' / ��, � ��' e"r ;'� ' �\ `\�, \. � . � � ,'I '" n'��'�'l' : �� ~! :i -�t �/ / -'i}`%,' `��"11J'� `��..e.r.�...�.ri . � :-�%�� ,.� �ooMr u�. � ��/ : � ;`�.' �"'° J %' _� � �, �,��.� �r /, .�`j s : .�J� •—�V ' /:�•��, \ ''� �/' % � '`-,�� `�� ° . � . i ,� r :�,r, . /' '�., ,� 3 ��w �,�': i� ��..o.�� a►..�... � . �...., :i,� ,�: � � ; � a." - t. LOT 1 � • ,. �� Swsi "�1_ LI 'r.\Y,'/.� 1r . 126 wn • ` t � 's' ��---�' �\'� \ �/ --- �i r� ,� .i�� ; . ;_ ,� : . .� - � � ` : . ' 1 �� / ''ee�. ��m.. � \ !{ ; � ;a• . —_.J. \ � a.. °. _� �. " 1"�__� i' '. 3 � � \ � � ,( �or.e ---�-,�c-m-. .y... � I a:,,M \ • . zs� •s , � - --- -- �^: L_ �� t�I .__-�, --`--'—'�-----\�—.___�'_----_'"s..eow�a�'-r `.i ' Y�' . ti _�— ',i i � aEx. � �w�+�.ia:r�ewoncc• , . �"`"""" . O H B E J O Y F U L �«F�+e�MF•x � ss. f ro.o � 1 3 .wE,=N::..�, � _ _: SUBDIVISION �` �-. ■'^OEL"Siyp91Y"01• DESIGNWORBSHOP.INC. Ira •. :.. Y°� PROPOSED SITE PLAN ��M°-..•"'" . ,,.,..rta -:s,f . ` .ueuo..00wcwue rw[.s�ouu.�s��tl' { . � c�c..000s..wc:. •s.[. ro�o�.oe u�u ...4 �. � twwna�ss..er•na]Malscse..�adoso..Mnu'�aes ra s .• . " otoon -�-� Tlsvi34�1.3s�sN.T.�3�ILKW.d�WlJIIM�Cawl.CAadn CMw;DO �W�LI i ��. �x ______-_ wMENObtENT TO EXISTING PLwT � 1 ��,}'��. ��_, i 'Y, � y. r ._,.,._....._ .. '' i.' �,� _.... ._ ... __ .._..._. __. . --::'4;� t .� . . _ . . . . .. .. . . ./'r... . .. . ...... ... �. , . _..: - . � /`� .Y. '��7>.r•r��"' r-��1�..' , __. . .-i+f F.' . � . '} '� . � , . �:. . • �+ '. .� ' '"'a � . -!; �{..- . � � _. ...{� � . �' ` , � . . � F . . t:�t !1�,s, � . ` ... . ;S;i 5.itj"T��:�" � . ..i`- - �:'GU:,��;°_��::.;:� . f . '�:��-%�.7 e � • . . i-sf��.:{^`;-.: . • � . . ��4.ti�.�lJ� .. ' . .,.nr.y�. . � Y ��..r . � ' ... .'s5'� ai .:t� . tn� � , niti}•+' '�,x`t':,%1`4�'" zi'wi�y: - . ff'q,,:��. J��r� . . . �'v�� t .��: ,S s ��.""':�`°' . _ . ,. �r � , ' � � '�- � �`:;}':,, ',' . :�';': ,,.`<.,,,; '� I ��ah�.., � � r �,..:;::� ' s�' ..� o ao eo t=o uo �aoo r'�'•:':'�.. r�=:i:;,.. ° 'I °`. .... ., � � .`. � � � , �,4� L£GENO , �.� � . I W i�w�:o:.n..m.u.s t ad nooeua m.s.•.a E. ; � �e��en.00d h... t� I ; � _� Yrq�t�OnDNCMS . �. . � `. . f�M.�i ;�: � � { �r TrlYS . � . � LOt 7 , el� � 1512sCrn•. t ,:':�" ;.t �e � � . 1 ,\i` t �, . I \ �.'\\\ 7 �` �' 4��. � � .\ '' �i .\\� t z�'.� f �� k�.,,.M�,� � � % E v�N��. ♦\'.�. '�` ' ' � •��'" .. - . �/t ``.�,�, - / �� , . �. �+�' �,�" � � � / Ji.�iiu�.n�.�� .��. ��'1 � ,�,N�� .-. � � ,,��?:c�� .°� �,.'�':.° �� ;. /� _._./ / / �� ' � / i / � � ��I � �� . ! 1 . �� ,l( ' r:;,�: i �--�—:� t �� : �,�l. �' . ��.J � ! `' � ' fa{�b4�� ` 1 � �•� �� ^ I�Gr� f ' i �',\�\ � �� J�~y� ��\\ �.. � �. � •t .`q.,. � �1•'' ,wnr 4,. i/. � �,�11.� �i.,.i �r \ �,S / ' f t "1 - 1. 1V� .:�; _ /� `1 � „ �' " � ,�,�� c� �.. :� �}:l 11 `�iMrN�t��Mw� • p'�1 � . ' �'l �!'P. � � �_ . ' °`" �� ! 7 �"":�, �/�..�} � .. �a \ t / . I 1 �` �..: �� y� '12.6 wa / . } \ . r� _ , ;; . y . .�, . , i 4 , ; , �:�� ; - � . . ,� � . , � I�� i \ C •IIU4N� � :. s�. E��MN ,��`� �. �.a� , , • � �' ,\ � . I _ . : LoT a . - : . TSJaa�t 0"��- 1� ��' � �. 1 /"^ _� ��'Q�.'_� �� l.�- .( �`.�-.11.l�./ � .�.�v� , �- —_-4� �'__'--�--` s+�awiwvr � . . i � �"�"""" ' O H B E J O Y F U L ' "�" . .�'�� `�p"�`�. �( .�;,.+�... �'iJ� i. ,w�.o 4 :..�,��. � ,.. -- � .,',� SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN `�`�"�'"`°"' o�iceWO�us-aoz�xc � [1[�O��.a��(� J � CO�rp��e(D �p(�S�Ov':�'S,�ff � - _ � � Ta�epqKSawlalldl.C{pSNnlOefOrlf/ry1rM�fw�Wr .�GhW�OG�rt�n/F •S�l• COtO �OD � �, ' �w�.�ooc a...cs. wauo. o•� i.�a.lfaa�.fa 1ls.ls_1Lw.w.H«�sralr�n.fian.ceena. ao+.00 mvfaa. ey . . .t... _._ " E Y S ��0 �u r W�L) .`�.,�:::. ','.-. . ..� �� '�"-. . ��'_ n��. )� '1 1< `�. � ..-_._._... . . ..... . . . .. . ., . . . . . . . . . . � }. : -- _ ,� � - ��. ._ _�-a------�- . . _ ,. : : . . . = ..� . __� f +F�,f ` .:t.:2?.z.: . . �'.J.::?.'_,.;�el..'�_ . . 5 '��f�'�� . _ .�.! _ .. � • ``• �.�i.'.: � �' '2�� .�, - , . �,.y,,"<, .... • ;it�`;''�. ,,.ui:�:�"i!^�:; , ;'��',.� '�'su��,. . • - '''�3t��„�.T � � � - :�.', .__ �+nw�rrr�nw _ . . _... ___.._. ........ . ....��...r�l... . __... �', ' . ' � .. . _.... .;S°�1P� ' ' '--__... .__............ ...—. . �• :_...... ._..._._ ... .._ . . . .. . . .. _.._ y � . . .��. � . . . `i . . . .. .... .... . . . (}ll��y�.t'�'. . � / // Ie�•[�.�fA.i�. � \ 7.�x�$k..�til,•'.... , ' ��,«to:{y}i1:•.:.c... � jt'�:...'t+Y. • II.CENERAL REGULATIONS � A. Compliance with Policies and General Regulations As this is an amendment to a recorded plat,only the items affected by the amendment aze discussed in detail. See Sheet 3 for the Proposcd Site Plan. �i'.` The site is divided by the Stewart urigauon ditch which traverses the site between ,.,��.:`;_, ��, ., . contours from 7,065 feet to 7,095 fceG The bes[buildable lands(based on criteria ,� ;��i-�_ � includin slo e, eolo and visual im act are below the ditch. All develo ment in[his � 8 P 8 gY P ) P �;''" project is located below the ditch. A shon pomon of the ditch has been relocated to � '-- . allow driveway construcdon. ' • ��: � Division One-Resource und Environmental ti. ; .�;' 5:100: Soil.Su�cial Geolo$ical Characteristics and Radiation � r;:".; .. �� : . - The soil type throughout the development uea of the site is a Burnett-Libeg association. The Libeg soil is moderately deep and well drained,though a litde stony. It is found in convex pordons of the site. The Burnett soil,located in concave portions,drains more , easily and is not stony. Slopes'over[he site average 6%to 12 3'0. Construcdon envelope areas generally slope at ''; 5'�n to 15%. a 5.101: Drainaee The pmposed development inciudes only[he additional PMH careraker's unit to thc existing p1aG (2 units will be accouunodated in the exisang house). Therefore,the � change in quanary of unpervious surfacc on[he site will be minimal and che overall i - � drainage impact will be similar. � . .�.- The consavcrion envelopes are located away from na[ural drainage courses. The main �� irrigation ditch is maintained across the site,(see Site Improvemcnts Plan,Sheet 4). New - ditches,as shown,will supply water to plan[ed areas and will divert water away from the ;L �\` access driveway. Culverts will be consauc�ed under the driveway wherc necessary. � 5Y,"� wGE' �; V. {lyY: , �..-. _ V r 4 ! t, ��=: ... � ..�, .,i . �". �t� �--___ ....__-- � . �' ---- ._....__... ....__.. ;., � - ._...__.__ ... .._.._�.... ._.__._._. _--_._..�_ : A -� F � �, ��'j�. _. . ,.e,,.�,,._-� �. ,}� �f.: _� •-__�_��.�.►��—� . i�•'� -'��. : . ,. ' � K ,. . {,��y;�,: . ;i•'.;,:ia'-,�: . 'r F�cG:.T . . :;k_V;,�.�_ . . �'jy!� , .�.;t-�l�..,� _� . , '..�u`�- ' � ( � �'..�.'�:^i'sY;� . ' � . :��;tk �� ' . ' • - ��k� ,.: . . r iy*.".'. . �<t�i1�' ti. :' . ,��4_.�?{: - '., �'��": !�'°if,�:i: ��;��.^ j.+� �� i �!y'�,..�? . . �.� ` . T�xN�„�; � ,` � . . . .,ss.::.+,. N �: �f . . . � .. .. ..u..� ,u..� _ ......a-.��e'.:. �' ....,-.. . '. . � ' !� : ... _. . ...... -. .- . . .. . .�.. .._ ... Y. ,,, . . - . . � . . .. . .. . ,�k4�1 1 � \ y'e��Sn;M,�. �fi ' �:�'�`ir�� - No water quality issues or pollutants a�e expected from the construction. Special attention will be paid to the construcaon of the PMH units. Ecosion,revegetation and construcrion sedimenta6on control measuits are no[ed in the next section. 5-102: Erosion � ,4..',., i.,l�.. The development will be designed and executed in a manner which will minimiu ` disturbance of nacural vegetation and soil cover. ��` - ��; The driveway is designed to fit the form of the land and to minicnize cut and fi1L - Guidelines will be provided so that the buildings are designed similazly. � V"`'` Prevenaon againsc crosion and sedimentadon will bc provided for during conswction. � The following will occur to managc consnucdon: �•� ,:�, '� r;. 1. All iopsoil witlun the consuvction zone will bc sa-ipped and stock piled on the ' i sice foc use in landscaping and revegecation. ' S 2. Areas to be disturbed will be limited to excavadan,material storage,vehicle access and pazking and driveway and service drives embaz�kmen� ., 3. Landscaping and revegetarion will occur on all areas disturbed and be completed as quickly as possible following exterior building cons�ruction. Areas revegetated will be irrigated to ensure seed gemrinadon and plant survival. { - 4. At the low side of rhe PMH site consauction wne,runoff will be filtered in gravel � filled ditches as shown on the Site Improvements Plan,Sheet 4. 5. Any disturbance caused by utility conshvction will be revegetated and restoreti. 6. Following project complerion,any temporary scdimentadon conaol measures will . ' be removed and thc site will be cleaned of all consauction debris. 5-103: �ompatibility with Historic and Archaeological Resources i ��, i Thtre are no icaown historic or srchaeological resources on the site. =� =t. �� J � y .. �� N ��1:�u:'.::.'':?�"•"• � .Stl.�v �,'�,�}.,. rJ . �.')��J.�'. - _�f� �.'' 3: „�—__'__-__.__.._��_..__..__.__ ._.._......_.,.... . ..._.: ._-. . . . .._..._.._ �' .. .__... . �- . , � . -._.'. __..__..... . .._...... .... . _._.�... ._. . F�. .''� . - re'�� r. F � �''�t�+�� .. ' � � ._._ �T^-;� .. .�'``.. .., , ... �� i: . ' "!r_y.,. . . . � �� . �} ..F. ,.. . , . ._-- .. } 'i.�','• � . . ' - ' �Y,�k.,,��nc� � . .. . y�+�,.�;`:F:t� . .. •��Y�. � ,i;;::� a••�-: . .;_..�.,:,,.; vrt:'`r;;�'��. . . - ,� -•.: T`- . " - � � � . � "'. . .,a��v; � . � . . 7�y° .. .i.�'t",��'g • . ' � . . ��:_ • �n . S�A��. ',.�-,'q..�%ti ` . . �i' � +�L:`�x��+� � . . `'�:�' '�.... . . . '�l�{H_ ' ' t. YF ��. �� _..�.;.,, .-._Y,: ��,s.,:� � . ... � . ; �� ,°rt r ��; � ' � \ . . ' ��F.�a•„ a'�p 'Fi,'. . ' �iF,T�+t7��'�.. • �.i�,n;.:. 5-104: Com�aribili[y with A�sicultural Land and Onerations �,`„' The dcvelopment has been designed to ma�cimiu a coaaguous area of irrigated pasture iand to preserve agricultural lands wherever possible. The character of the property will - remain rural. Tho pmposed homesite configuration improves upon the existing situarion by relocating ,_..;;ti;,':.: the buildings to cieate open pastuce adjacent to Snowmass Creek Road and clustcring the Y;.`%'�� : employee units outside the agricultural azea. �� fi� � ��,. �. I 5-105: Scenic Quali� • =; r : <:;; The intent of the proposed development is to upgrade the value of the property �' -' " functionally and aestherically. The exisdng building configuradon is scattercd and '�'' . � � �: : altemadve proposed building envelopes aze Iceated in the midd:e of the pasture,(see Site � Analysis,Sheet 2). i j �..f .. �: The proposed dcvelopment improves views;fust,from the public view corridor of ; - Snowmass C`tEek Road,and second from the individual homesites. The foreground view s from Snowmass Creek Road is unproved by the relocation of the freemarket units to the dis•.ant pasture edge. The PMH units are clusteied adjacent to the creek. A large � . " conriguous area of pasture is thus maintained close to the road � . I `� . Eacisdng trees asound the main house and the creek edge will be maincained. Naturally " � �� grouped Cottonwoods will be planted along the property boundaries and also used co screen the buildings. T'he views out from the homesites will be maintainccL �. ' The development is located outside the area of high visual sensidvity which is defined on the CSU mapping as the slopes above the irrigation ditch. 5-105: Air uali � t-- All fireplaces shall comply with Pickin County Resoluuon No.86-91 and emission ` ,� 7 standards established by thc County. �! - The driveways will be gravcl surfaced and ireated with dust re[ardants. �� ,� ; � Y. ;..j� ..�;�� .:ti�;;' � � � �� . 6 ,Z't;.., F- ,,,,�-,_. , ._�__��.� .._. .: �_.._. ..:__:,... ,,:.:....._ , _ . . ... .. � __ � ',� ;; 3' __.. : .� ., _ . ., - � � . i a �� . �,� �ti �:... ' __ . Y��„�� w' � �>.r��,:, • �_°�✓� ..�y�_ti;;� r. , ;:'�.t^:r,�'. ,. _ _ +�"x�;�,t':- , - ,��i; °•#�f�tn:�: +�:_.., .<t 1�°:.. . ,`.�-,;:�� ° , _�;r'- ( '��'�'t;i��, • � . , . _ ' . .:.y.�Y�^N'i.�,j�i�� ' . ' , "�,�iq ;.�._ , . ' �ia i� � - • . . .. - �;�;�.t��'_' '`r-C::� � � � . . ',it�+q f , � < ,�� ` � . iT'1:t�: . .�;_. _n... . ��,�..�.� ��c, � , ��: :�— . . ... .... , �.,. _.. . .._. .. .. _ , � ( ��,,,�,.�;��: � �;;��'��,.,' � w;w��;.��i: . • , , ��'^�::•,;,�:.i . • 5-107:WaterResources Im�act �U1�+':�E E�^�':�. The sepac systems for each lot and for the PMH units will comply with the Pitlan County i Individual Sewage District Regulations. The sepdc fields will be located on the owners' � lots. One PMI�septic field will be in a septic easement on Lot 2 and the other lceaud in the PMH common azea.. The development will not adversely affect the availability of the water for irrigation of �'��''�;:` �- agricultural lands. Garden areas will be irrigated using weil wa[er. �'''%' �3 - f � T'he number of units are consistent with those on the existing approved plat and will not ��`'''"� ,,; _ � : cause increased interference with ground water resources. Water supply for PMH units will be from a 10,000 gallon water tank served by existing wells on the site. The tank '� � will be relocated. Free market units will be served by individual wells. ,t. ` The PMH units will be located outside the 100 yeu flood zone,at a minimum of 60 fee[ �'�i': � a:.�. ,. fr om Snowmass C ree k high water mar k. ' !`'•;` � �, � . - Division Two-�scal and Services/Facili6es Impact and Design ; 5-200: Sewage Treatment and Collecrion The on-lot Sepac Systems will comply with the Pitldn County Individual Sewage and Disposal System Regulaaons. On site investigation will determine[he best locafion for � septic Fields,ideally locating in the Burnett soils on concave portion of the landscape for the best percoiadon. Nazrow trenches will be dug along the contours. � 5-201: Impact on Road Svstem . Road sysum unpacts axe projected to inerease by 7 one way trips per day which is[he h. unpact of one single family dwelling unit(caretakers unit). This will create arinimal impact on Snowmass Gteek Road ,r�`•- �; ,1 �'�. '�.?>r`. '.''-.'.k:.;tFi, � �M'.' 7 �. .-.�� : . "�.1:•�x�,'�'�.. i.'::.ti :k �. .:� .. "". ._..____"_" .. ._ ....__..._. : ' .• .'_'.�.....�..._ .... � � t .. ....�..._..... .. .�....�_... _..._. . . �� . i(,.�' -.. , . � `h. ..4,��i Y��: � �� x°" _ ' `�_� . . :l�,_,''$*- �� . � - �:��„s:{�,,.�.,: M. . . ..._ �r- t��: - _. ti r,'�:',va��` . .. . . . • ..h3: �� ^ �..�I,...;:_ki_ . � y:.�,.. :: , •��);i.,'x_. � . -a'�"k 4;; . Er-�, ` - �. V�� _��, .`��"w" . �� , . r . ;��: h, �#= ,` � . ,:r:oi;j>'F' � _ • �� . . r--.._..: ... -,.. . . _..... .,.. - -- - . , , . ; _ ..... �.��;��:��:1<� '�r� ,_, . . �' �' . !�I'.�e.: , ''��'►e:y.i. . ' . ��,�'��jy. . k-,�:,��;�'- � 5-202: Road Design and Construction ' The roads to tfie PMH units and the driveways to the freemarket units will be designed to "County Access Standards"in secdort,as described in Pitkin County Road 3tandards and Specificadons. The roads ro the PMfi units and the driveway intersection will'�c 20'-0" wide. The individual driveways will bo 14'-0"wide. ,1r t.' Access to the freemarket units from Snowmass GYeek Road is at the present site cn�ance. .;��.'•==;'.� �� - Access ro the PMH units is from a separate road(see Sheet 3),which has been approved 3� conceptually by Tom Newland,County Land Use Engineer. Pazldng for the PMH lots is °'�' '� provided at two or more spaces per unit. � 5-203: L.�eical Extension of Utiliaes ;��;Y ,,. �j .. i The power lines from the main line above the ditch to the homesites will be placed ��:; under ound b Hol Cross Elecaic,(see Sheet 3). �)�"• .�. ` 8r Y Y �,,r.'•;'- _i . ;; Telephone service will be provided by US West Communications. Lines will bc placed underground. Television service is available from the Piddn County Translator System. ,� � 5-204: r**+�A�r��n Taxes and Management of Necessary Services and Facilides ,a,.s�, i ; It is anticipated that there will be a posidve fiscal impact as a iesult of praposed s improvements to the Oh-Be-Joyful properry. No unusual impacu on the above aze _ andcipated. Fue protecdon will be by means of wa�er from the 10,000 gallon scorage tank and from Snowmass Creek 5-205: Adequate Provision for Water Nceds `. Water will be suppliui to the PMH homes by a 10,000 gallon storage tank fed by wells existing on site. Freemarket lots will be supplied by individual wells. Irrigadon for ;;'.. manicured areas azound houses will be supplied by the wells and will no[exceed 5,000 sf �'_� per lot. � See Secuon 5-204 for details on fue pm[ecrion. � � -�-,, _-: Y�:•;'_:'. �,:::';-=.' ,��;. .k.:'.}•:;k,�.. tia .t;��: 8 1��:n ; .. ;r. :� h.: `:,, ---------__._. .--- ; . ___�_._,___ .._.__ ___.. �. �� -- --�—- --�- - .. _ -..R. ,;„�,, �� _:. � �....,.�="_ ;;��' • 4 . `�'�„' _ � i✓ 'F z` . .,��f, . � ��, s��: . ' �`��x�. '~;;:'-:�.;��:� ,�u� � . _ �ti'y��-`��"�: . ' , � � . .:k�� .` ' . • . , 4�'`'s'��„ . . � :`+.t�,�.7e��:�' __❑ :�y�ik�'s'R`+{�, � .x�ip�v�-'L� ��°�"�ae.``��: �_��;. '�� r. � ` ' . . ,..� ___.� . � .. _ __. . ��. � .. . �.- .. ._.,_ .__.. . ,.._. ..._. _ .. ..�,... �__ _ : . ... .. ._. . _ _ ._ . .. , _. , €r+� h i,: � c ( ��.,�,1..�'tk .. � �s�R,f�{e�. • ' �.:64�Cyt::.`;•.:.. i�'i»:�`'rs.;_ , Irrigation ditches wil!supply water to the pasture and to tree planting along the roadways. , Division Three-Social '- 5-300: Housine t.;1.:;.,:� The proposed devclopment has an equa(number of fieemarket and an equal numbor of '"'�' - PMH units as the existing plat as weII as a PMH caretakers unit,therefoce no addidonal �`s housing is required 'fhe PMH homes and unit will be in the moderau income cate o ��`Y•� '� g �}'• . .,r�,-.:.;-. . The caretakers unit will also be subject to employee guidelines. The apphcant mten to � __ build the employee units under the recommended guidelines. A PMH Homeowner's �, ,; .. Associadon will be formed. �� f'��; Division Four-Areas and Activities of Local and State Interest �'��:. : 1��. The site contains no known geologic or wildf"u+e hazards. Buildings ue located outside � �: ' the 100 year floodplain as identified on the Flood Insurance Maps. T'here are no known '' � i ;; _- his[oric or archaeological resources on the site. 5-404: Wildlife Habitat . �� Generaliud CSU mapping indicates severe elk and deer habitat over a lazge pordon of + � the site. The elk habitat area indicated includes the existing building azza. � To obtain more site specific informadon,the applicant consultcd Randy Cote of the Division of Wildlife. He approved the relocauon of dwelling units provided that they ! remain below the main urigadon ditch. - Dogs will be kenneled or leashed, r � ,- ?� -E �, w �� ,f ...�.�.:, B � ,�`: �`� � t ;y �: N. . : _.. __��-----_ ___..._.....�_.__ ---..—_-- __ _..__ ._._...� ___. __._. .'; . :.F'�n' 1A- � • . '^ .. h ��b: � . � '.' . . '' .. -�C' . 'A+et��a�'''.. , . ,—.- ..-..�vaa..�'�� .. � �� , �ss..� �� .- �,fi��.��= . � " - .. � � . .tt5il:vN�2.�� . . . �� a. . r��ti, ,��; irt'�..�� . � . _��.<'�,,'. . - . . . ..��t��;`�`� . . . – �l� � . i;�,�a.T-:. . ' . . � ;��L�,, . ��. :��,. , , ; . ��:' �w��,�;. '�x:''"r�.ti:. 'S��4. " ' . . ;�:+, ,rVk�K � • • � . �`•;t;i':�• � ' �„�.. _ _�� ..._--__ � '�.. . ... .. . ._._ : ��.°, � . _ . • .. .. �,.. .. � _ _. ,_ . �... .,. . . . . ...,�,.... y �...�..... . • . . . . ,. . ....... .. v......� ..a��.� �� . ' �y��k/�1: f ' ( � , • f r'�"u' � : � � . . �:;��s,;.:: �,�.ilr::�_ B. AdditionulInformation ' i. Assessment Information and Marketabi(ity Disclosure The site plan was reviewed and confumed through discussions with reai estate appraiser, Scott IIowie,of James Mollica and Associatcs Inc. The following informarion is a summary of his comments regarding[he plan. '.'�'2:` - ��' - E"�- 1. Market building envelopes-They are in the proper location but need to be � �� ` as large as possible and sull leave adequate space between parceis for �f;.'`.`�: , : 1 privacy. Specifying the lcea[ion and size of the envelopes is criacal, being pe�eived by buyers to be an important protecdon of property � values. �� .` F '. ._ 2. Lot 5ize-It is not that important that all lots be tho same siu. What is ��•�' , important is the visual setdng for the houses,privacy,views and sun. Lot '' r�'• sizes and boundaries should be adjusted to provide for these concerns,to � use the access road as a boundary and to provide adequate usabte pasture for each loG Lot sales price is esdmated at$250.000 to$275,000 at the � present dme. - �y , 3. PMH Units-They are in the proper location and will not impact the ' ; { . market units. A traii and fishing access easement along the stream and che separat�madway is imponant. Separate lo[s will be created for them and . they witl have nothing to do with the freemazket lots and homeowners association. , 4. Pasture land-Irrigated pastures should be included with each lot and should not be common property. Maintenance and'urigation could be a function of the home ownen associadon but should not be a requirement < as buyen are becoming more reluctant ro share any more than is �� 5. necessary. Riding rrails and easements will be routed along the edges of � ' lots in the meadow and at the mountain edge on the up side of lots. ,� •,,; . �W ��'� x ��., fi L��a ` 10 ' �� *.: . , ; • _. --�- ---------._�_�._. ., _ ---._ • _ -----___ .__....____---._ � : .... ___., _....� ......__... . .... . __._ . . +Y � . "_'....�. k. ' ': `+�.. . . _._.. . �.i . . _--.�� . `^L �[,( . � ��.Y-� . _ w � ' ':^'��i� i�a�-' . . .. . - - . �'`R.1:�:�. . .. . - r . . �:�i^_71.�y;�. .. ' � ' „ fr t}'lr+�,�''� '�n..� . . . . ' .Y�;�: • ;.y'r;:__ ,:w'��x � � • � ��•:�i�. . ' •:��'�'q'=•''.,' - � ;,� :sis''-. ' , ��ti �y '�� ,-�:=,. ��.:: :.?�`-� ' • �?�: �'�r s . . ;,�� ,,�-':�r'f '` t.�:: . �'� . ,.,.... ..,... . , - - � , . _ .. _. ` �; � /' � �t3*n \ �a��.� 6:. .. �ii�`�r�ti.. ' . ' • !"��A:.r,n:': 5. Home Owners Association-The association should control the on site carctaker unit,urigadon,maintenance of she road,fencing,ditchos and meadows,and have responsibility for administering the covenancs and resa-icdons(C&R). The C&R should address the foregoing plus � azchitectural guidelines including permitted uses,revie��,-.:ocedure and ' architecturtil controls. --.;,:'- ...�.. Further information on this secpon will be supplied upon request. '��,::;;';+;�-: �� _ 2. Schedule of Dcvelopment � -.� It is the applicant's intent to continue to rent the existing PMH housing undl the Spring of 1990. Construcaon of the project is andcipated for Fall 1989. Site �` - improvements will be the fust phase of work. The access driveways to the lots will be built,the short portion of the ditch will be relocaied and selected � `° Cottonwoods will be lanted. The em lo ee units wiA be construcced in fall for f z�': P P Y i: t�..:, , _. winter occupancy,(subject ta Counry approvat). �A '; :� The dming of the sale of the lots will deterarine when the freemazket dwelling �.., . units wili be constructed. Guidelines for building design and landscaping will be � included in the covenancs. ;� 3. Easements # �j Existing power line and water easements will be maintained fluough the site. In � � ? addition a trail easement will be created adjacent to the river and a sepuc 4 easement witi bc located on I.ot 2,(See Proposed Sice Plan,Sheet 3). ti - 'i R � � ;: � � t�Y f'i :� � -.1..�.�, ,'' ;� � � ,� �... �1�'. ' A �� . 11 C.-� .�;-�j��' �� .... . . . X •'.: .i4��. j ... �. . _. ._».�...... . ._.----- ....__.._.., .. _. . . � ..:.... . ...........______. .__. _ _ �. ..._..,.,�. .�,. ....._..__. ., . . �; �y '.Y"�'-, . ,- �e!. . a t;... F SY'x- �� - k,3 1-: . '_'' . . . '�F:)?-r'..: . - . _;�s �d�.i��'. ' ^�.y . �y��y+.��%y' . . . ' . y�.�-�i'r.-' , {`�X��:_; . . '• ... '��+SS,'::: iy;��"�?'a;r�: , 3 ;.?�• �, .��, � . �� 4k , q '!u:'1z':' ' ' . . . . . . � }� �.: . . . . � • � 2s';��..�w-;;. " . � .. � � ' ' ��u��e : ��:��ft� - � . YA� t. ..�.��. iiy:.�. � . �:�'��l. . �� v� • • '��" ` "r:�;.'"y.. �: . i"� � .. . . .-. . _... �` _._ ��.,+, . . . . ��`ik�t . —9 n �..��r�t._r • . . _ . �. � . I j.. . �,� �'` : -- . 4�io • . . �,-t �' ��:��:': • RESOLUTION Of THE 60ARD Of CDUNTY . COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO,� �,' GRANTING F1NAL PLAT APPROVAL TO THE� L �.' . c��-��g�(�Ibn� �f`��L e 9�1�'� �� . , • Resolution i.:7. 81 - 9z �,� _WHEREAS, Jan R. Christensen (hereinafter referred to as "applicant") is the owner of record of approximate7y 118 acres of real property located in the � `.^'?' �7 - Old Snowmass area af Pitkin County and more specifically described as f v "Exhibit A", and . �`r� WHEREAS, the applicant has proposed subdividing the 178 acres into ten �`'' � �"� separate parcels each for single-i'amily use; except for lot•2 which shall � � _ . 3 .:,:.,-.. remain a vacant parcel, ineligible for residential use, and lot 5 for which • •;�:'`` special review approval was requested for a duplex ta be condominiumized, and �� WHEREAS, a public hearSng was held on August 25, 1980 at which time the ��', �,. j r,, - , Board heard evidence and testimony presented Nith respect to this tpplication. � t, NON, THEREfORc, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County�Lomrissioners of Pitkin Caunty. Colorado, that final plat approval for the [en lot Oh 2e '' Joyful Subdivision/P.�J.D. and Special Review Approval for the duplex use of lot 5 of the Oh Be Joyful Subdivision is hereby granted subsect to the fallov�ing conditions: . � 1. Tfie satisfaction af comnitments'made by John Doremus in his letter on behalf of Che applicant to correct life, health.and safety deficiencies -- in his letter to Richard 6rice of September 22. 1951 and Patsy Neubury's � memorandum of September 23, 1987. � 2. The recording of protective covenants for Oh Be JoYful Subdivisian as herein amended. • ` 3. Paragraph 27 of the rotective covenants for Oh De Joyful Subdivision ' shall be amended to requi,re t prior approva o t e 'oar o ounty Commissionersof Pitkin Lounty ns to, and only as to, the first , • sentence of paragraph 26, the first and fourth sentences of ptragraph 17, all of paragraph 20, and the second paragraph of paragraph 26." - 4. Approval by the Colorado Uepartment o` Health of the Hater supply system. i j� 5. Hith respect to qualifications and guidelines for low, maderate, and middle income housing a.nership and rental housing as may be established • from time to time by the Pitkio County Housing Authority, the following �.{ restrictions shall apply: a. Lot 5 -- lrn+ ' . b. Lot 6 -- middle a Lot 7 -- low _ . ,� fti., d. Lot 9 -- loN � T- : . u. �• 6. Lot 2 shall forever 6e a stcrilized lo[, incligible to bc used for �' '" �� ' residential purposes. . ,��,.. , 7. No new road cut, onto Coun[y roads tl�all t+c allowed. > � . re.• �a,�3 ---- • ' : __. . .. . _. .. : �r: . . . . . ... _.. �� .._. .• . � t � . ��---�-� . tfi � h. i{� j'it.�,: . __. t �� ' i . }'{Tdd+� ' ' . ._:_.e..� � �� , � . t � ' f�,"il .1}Frfi:�. . .. �- . '��-�-�`.'+�.� . . , . `,c:y�. . ;=-�;',�,�°: ` :'-��4:`,� . i �'� , '.�� ., . � . . 1 • � . �..,P3''�',x:��:..', +°l:��::R,�x�: � . . . � ,;��i'n�x'.'��; .. .. - . :y'`N� _.'�,�`�.'1}} �jY�� „A��' '�:Y. .�C.'�a':)��4� ' • ��µ � . :a'�M��. _ ' . �.�;.~:.'F ` . . .___...._. . ,�E�.� . . .. . . . . . ..- . ... ,_..,......,._.._. T _.' ... . . . . . SilAP°'f.! ._... . ._ - . ._ . _ � _ .. , ..... . . . ., _�� _.�..:...... . ... .�. _. . .. ...:.......-".....�...,•�. .. ......... . . . ' . — � � `.i � I .��rfi�.�'��. 8. Firtal approvai of thc rcvfsed enginccrtin9 planz for the Natcr su ly � �q�� y�� PP .a:�?'"':; � system by thc County EnvirorvnenW7 Ilcalth Deputment. =',�'.�-';;;.' � � Approved Dy the 6oard of County toamissioners of Pitkin County,.Colorado, . at their regular mecNng on October 13, 1981. � , 'BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS � , �/�� ` $Y / , . � , !i�/. Boh hild, Chairman • . ^ i} • ff ATTEST: � . ,r�:�-: �0""��` . � � � <.: + , � � . . � , . � eputy Gounty Clerk . . 4 r� APPROVED AS TO FOAM: � � � f .��., a��.r�er�'�'��_�!1 . ° � `.��.::.,.. County AttOfney � j t�Y'�'`. � r• i s . , �ti i - S ,,; '`�� ` . . ` i ;�.i . � . . ;. . .S" . . ' � - � �°.a . ;_! . iij iQ ;.�� Y � „ ' - . 1'; ( ,�tt+,. �i 'a . � � � ��} b i . . S . � � :,. ' . . . '�� . � i � �k� r., •• i 'Y't,�',.,,';.`i�•�. ' . � r i • ' _., • � ,'f� .':�. . . , . .. ._�. _. ..___�_..._._�.__.�-�._._____.._._____._-- --.___...��. ..----_.. ._—�.., � �..c: .�� -W�!;,�-: - , a ,,^!`�'��- "�.. '' -- �.�-� + .�„ ,�.: . t::�.�-::.�` ��s';.r � jj- -� . . . .__, _: . :. . . - . �. .. . . ^ . _ <+R'�i..�� . ._ . , . . � . n�� . - . � ' �.. . ' .. -.. . . . 'Y,,, > . . . ..�x�.��.r�,� . . . � . . .. . . . . � .xJ C"°"r . . . . . . � . �1`x pi��.' � . . � � . � , • ' . . .�v��w . . . . ' . , . .. . "'�^�"F�p S,? � . . � , .. . . � . ��a.�� . . . . . :i'. �� . � - . � F . :•.r rr .*J �� ' , . °.tR-'Y`S. .�.:�: : , �.. ..... ..... . ..... . . . _ . . _ ......_. .. .. . _ ... _ .._ _ .. .. . . _ _ _ ' , .. . ��;�,� � ' ' ( -�'',#�'�'"`6� , , � �`a�'�.�:,'. , (,�!_5 � � PAO'ffCtIVE COVENANTS . � - �':t'S{l�;'� . • FOR OH-DE-JDYFUL ACItF.S SU6DZVISLON ' Jan R. Chrietenaen, ovneY nncl developer oF Oh-➢E-Joyful Acres Subdivisio�, declares the follaving covennncs, aonditlons, reetrlaclons and resetva[ions are � applieable co snd sfiall be covenonce runnSnF vith Chc real property knovn aa Oh-Pe-Jo,yful Acre■ Subdivision, as ahown on the Finel Subdivleioa Plat thereof � recorded , in Plat Baok�_at Yage af the Pitkin Councy iecords, [o-viC: � � � 1. Number and Locncion of Bufldin�s. Y•o 6uLldinCe, impravemen[s or � � struetures s all be plaecd, cre�ted, altered o[ permitted to remain on Lots 1, J , � or 4 ocher than one deCeched a.lnRle_family_dvellinp,house, one gues[ or serv6rtt � � .� - h6veR,_Qne nttnc�o�dc[n6hcd�nra�c, wnd on'e'bnrn or aenbl¢ or ocher na-n=�- "��, � ..:.:�� .." � iesidenclaT�ou[�u1�inR oThe'C'2'ic�e"n-gntu$e. ` -'��""" +;",'ttj"' `�� " Vo dvelllnI{huuse shnll be placed, ereeted, nitered or penni[ted to reneSn ��r' . _ �� on Loca L, J and�4p}i n sice or locnclnn other [hc• vithin [he buildinc envelopes shovn ,� - ' � on the re�orded p15te of che Oh-6c-Joyful Aeres Suudivlaion. � 7 � _ . `--�' No resident;nl dvellln� vnits of any kind shall be pleced, ercUCd or permit[ed ��^ !.��' - . / [o remnln on l.o'L 2!_ S••'..'>, . � No bui!dSnRe improvemence or ecruatures ehnll be plaeed, ereeced, nlcered or � � . + : permLtted co remain on Locs 6 chrau�h 10 o[her than one detaehed•einFle-family � ' - - dve111nA house, and one attnched gecege. � . �Sr . . No 6uildinRS, Smpravementa oc sttuctures shnll be plaeed�"ereeted, alCered or /i � perwltced ro remain on Lot S other chan one 2-family duplex dvelling; and 2 ettsehed �✓ '� . , gaCages. ��1:...: '�•'Arehfteecurai Controls. No reElecting roofa shall ever be uaed or '�'��.�� permitte2 [o remain on any bulldinRs or structures loea[ed vi[h1n the'said lote. 1 � - �. the eseerior cal.ors used on auch buildinga or atructurea shell be hnrnonloua '�"�+'��- � � vich che nawral aurroundinga. Ho cutcinq af live treea or ehruba ehall ever be � t,:�:>. �� permicted on any of the lots, exeepc [o clear the deei�natad building si[e. I , Si . 7. OfE-Street ParkSnF• �o dvclling house sliall be construe[ed on any lot � �,� uniess chere Ss eoneurrencly conscrucced an the same ].oc adequece off-atrea= parkinq � aceas for ac leasc cvo aucomobiles. � 6. ?emnorarv Scruetures. �o cenc or shack shall be plaeed upon any !oc and '� no Cemporary buildinFs, improvemenc or strut[ure shall be placed upon nny lat, Snciuding any cral!.er, exeepc during such reasonnble perlods as may be necessary j - for the cons[rvecion oC Smprovemencs on such locs. � �.g .5. C.overnmenc Re�ulacions. ro lands vlthln Oh-Be-Joyful Acres shall ever i :�i be accup!ed or used by or fo: nny struccure ot putpose or in any.manner vhieh is eo�trary co che coninr.� subdlvlsSon or A�illdinP rep,ulaclone of Pickin County, ' � - Colorado, validly in Eorce from timc ro c1mc, excepc as the same mey be alloved ' . - u�der snid re�ulations ns a nonconformin�or Spccial Reviea strueture or use. �'� 6. No HSninR. Dri111nA. ot Quarrying. No mining, quarrylnlc, cunneliny, - . �.j excavatlnR. or dri111nR Eor eny substancea, ineludinR oil, gae, minernls, gravel, � �� sand, roek and earth, but exp:essly excluding vacer, ehell ever be permitted .z vSChin the limlts of Oh-Rc-Ioyful Aeres, ex�ept in nnd on Lota l,-2 and 3. r �.t 7. Yo Suslness Uaea, ?Po lande vtchin Oh-D�-JOyfu2 Acrea nball ever be �i occupied or used for any eommeralal or buslness purpose nor fai any noxioue " _� actSvity and noching sball be done or permltced to be done on any of said lands ;� vhlch is a nuisnnce ar mighc Ee�ome a nuisanee to Che ovner or ovners of nrty of , snid lands. ihis rescrieclan shall no[ extend, Aovever, co eRrieulCUra1 or �� ranching pursuics. � 8. Enclosure o! Unsi�hc!v Faciiicies and Equfpment. All unalrht!.y t[rue[ures, . �!'{ facilicies, equipmenc and oche: Lcemc, Lncluding, hu[ noc limited co [hose epeeified � .t Lclov, sha21 be ene2oscd vich2rt a so21d �overed strueture, or sercened froa vlev, t` Any cral.ler, botc, �ruck, craccor, snov removal or garden equlpmenc and any . ; similar !cem shall be kepe, at all times, exeept vhen in accual use, in an :�i � enclosed RaraFe or ocher enclosed scructure. Any refuse or crash con[ainet, . ucSllty meter or otfier uc11!ty facility, Ra9, oil, vater cank, secviee area, �! ssorage p!le, or area for hanRing elothlnR or other household febiies shall be � enclosed or appropriecely serecned from vSev by plenclny,or feneing adequate ,��;� � co conteal che same f.rom nei�hbars, streets, privace roads and aceess drives. - \o lunbe:, mecals, bulk ma[eL?a15, scrap, refuse or [kash ahall be knpt, stored or allov2 co a[eumula[e on any locs excepL during [he course of cons[TUetion +t�:`-5,��"'.�_'• and only °or such reasonable period of cime as is necessery prior to che •�:'x"�� - eolleec!o^or dlsposal cherco`. A1! rubbish and trash shnll 6e rewoved from all '.�`2�:�� lo;s in 0?�-Be-JOyfu? Aeres aeC shall noc be alloved to.aecumulace end shnll not y: �� ' bc �urneG chercon. � 2 7,� � . _ ',u�"''��, ... " `�_ '`�� . ( ' .fi i . _ ..__._....__ .____._... . .. . 1 . � �': rw�'n'""'___' .. . _. .... ... .. ;+r._ _ . .._ -. � y�. _ w . ". _ ._�_ . /r : Ij . . 's._{.':: � ^�°�-� } .�.-:, • , . . .. . ti{ c nl-.. ' . .. . . ' . *-r.•^i_�-;:.: .. `.t5�;`�,�t� . . . ' ,�;�,,;?:.L'.t., . . %i`: . , � • � �S�'.3�a;.j.;�,�. � � . . .. .r�',��_ . . - '��i��'�.. • k'k:ts.h��?Y'��i� �. ;}a�„;�.{;c. . �� `. ;,�,t'FFi , .`u�"��- � :t ^n:`�- ` �r ;:;: � �:�� ; �-: _ , _ .- ;�k:;,, ; .- �. ( �`�,�'''�' f�,:'aA;;:.�::;�.:, • 1��'..1��..:,.��'. - " 9.� ro�crs ana Antennac. No ro�ere or ruJiu ur ccluvislmi on[ennau higlmr 4^;xi:�p�-. : chan three U) feec a6ouc cbe higfienc roof line of che dveiling house ahall be Fe��:{;:i;:.��.i. • eretCed on any lae, and all auch tovcrs and antennee nuat be aCCeched to ehe ' ducllSnR house. j l0. Tnnks. No eleva[ed [anke oE any klnd slmll ba erecced,placed oC perwit d � upon any residentlal loc. Any tenk uaed in conne�tion vlth any d�+e111nR house . or ochar seruccure on any reelden[Sel loc; lneludinF tanks for atorage of Fas, fuel oil, gasoline, oil or watec shall be buricd, or !f loce[ed above Rrou�d, th location and screeninp, shall be ne deterwined by the Homeowers Assoeiation. 11. Signs• No sign enu��o advertlsing devicc of any na[ure shsll be pincc'd upon a lot excep[ a small siRn in the�form and desiqn approved Ey [he Iloaeov�eTS • Assoeiacion and exeepc a small eign no larFer than six equare Eeet to indlcata che cract !a foz sale or rent, and the parcy, addreas und/or telephone number [o �~ concact for informa[lon ahouc euah sale, and ¢xcapt auch othur cype of eipa or ''"•S"�i - • aigns aa may be approved Sn vrlting by che Homeovners As�oela[ion. ��"'.'� � � l2. Exterior LtRhcing. All excerior lights or lighc swndarda on lecs shall ^�'��'�� e.- bc approved by chc Ilomcovners Association for harmonious devclopsen[ a�d the !.',�Ii„`_�`i�,� prevenclon of lighting�uicunaec [o ocher lands Sn Oh-Be-JoyEul Acres. ��.,:�.< �;. . I7. Sanicary Systems. No seva�e disposal sys[em, sanitory syeten, or sepcic : cank shall be �onatru�ced, altered, or elloved to remain or be used on any lot - , unless fully approved as co desLgn, capacity, location, nnd eons[ructlon by all proper public heal[h ageneles oE the S[ate of Colorado and the CounCy of P![kin. �' �'., . All saniWry sys[ems ehall bc properly mainWined o[ all timca by [hc loc ovnere. .- ..;� .. I4. Voxious or OEfensive Accfvicies. No noxious or offensive accivities ehall - � � . be aarried en upon any loc ac nny [iwe, nor shall anyching 6c done or pecwlcced C.�?� � vhich may be ur beeome a nulsanee to ocher propercy or to che ovnere ehereof. No ;;{:'.�-� � � flrearms shall 6e dlscharged on any lot. � -:�.;: � (15� Draina�c and Erosion Concrol. Each loc ovncr shall aonetzuct aulvcrts :� 1�.>',. wher�rivevays cross road dicches and irrigation ditches. The ninimuw eize of ' r�'�� „ nny eulvere shall be cvelve(l2) inehes in diameter, and shall be sa cons[rueted as � . -�q co be hidden from viev. Each individual lot ovner sha11 further be responsible '� Eor che inscallacion and maintertance of any ocl�er neeeseery droinaRC facilitles '�i required. Each individual loc ovner shall eleo be responcible for any damaFe � caused by utSlicy eucs, vashoutc, and runoFf damage caused by failure ca properly � Snscall and main[ain culverts, diversion and retention structures or any other , . drainaRe faeilities. No lot ahall be cleared or discurbed unnecesearily, and � discurbed lands shall be liralced co chose areas necessary foz aetual eone[ruacion. � �� ALL arcas disturbed by construction�ill be revegetated in a cimely and � �� professianal manne[. � �B 16� Animals. Oogs and household pets shall be kenneled or u�der leaac eon[rol on a ots ocher than Loc9""1„ 2 and 3 vhere they ahall be prohibited entirely. WicA respect co Locs 1, ]�/and 10, the Homeovners Association may require the . � ovner oE the said locs [o raaove any animals or poul[ry frSw che premises, if• � ' che Homeovnera Assoefacion decermines the land• ■re overRrazed. No horses or � �� aovs vlll be permlcced to be kepc on said Loca 1 and 7 Sf chere Su SnsufHcienc : pascure co malntaln them adequacely as detemined by che Homeovnezs Associaclon. ' �o anlmals///, ocher thnn household pecs, may he kepc on Loes 5, 6 7, 8 and 9. �Z �17./�eservaclon of ARrlcultural Lends and Nacural Areas.fExcept for che . � j,l exi'st.2�iR d d¢.sip,nated sice lo�ations(buildinR envelopea) for the dve131nR housec • � � on Lots I, 3/4 and !0, the remaining areas of said loes shell be reeained Sn . . ;3 r¢riculcu,yl�itching use and vheze �ietoricslly irrlRnced, ehall eoncinue to be '� irrigaced by the ovner of che lan��Any struetures eonstrueted, pLeed, ereeted � or maincained shall bc utilizcd s ely for the�proper Performing and malnt�ininF ' of che agricultural/ranching operation, and approved Ey the Nomeovnera Asaocia[ion priot to conscruccion es to loution. No treea or brush groving on any lot shell ��E .�:i be felled or trimmed, nor shall any naeural areas b cleared wichouc the priar ' ��'' _ vritcen permission of che liomeovners Assoeiation. here ehall be no distuzbance � co natural areas vichin 20' of the bank of Snauna�Creek, nor ehall there be ony � � /discurbanec of, or ehanFe in chc na[ural flov of Snoumass C[eek. Thc use o ; ��;.{ �/ persiscanc non-selecclve pesticides shall noc be permitced on the propezty� : - i 18. Combinin¢7raccs. If cvo or more contiguous residential lots are ovned , Ey :he same ovner or ovners. [hey may bc combined inco one or wotc larger cesldent�al � . locs by means of a v:iccen document execuced and acknovledged 6y all of the ovners �� chereof, and recorded in che real propercy rewrds o: Pickin Counry, Colorado. � �� .c� Thereaicec. [he new and larger loc or locs shall eaah be considered as one loc ! i ' �:'. :or che purpose of [he applitacion o` chese covenancs. x��' �� - k• . 19. Oh-Be-JovCul Acres Homeovne:s Associn[Son. A non-proficColoudo � y'�.�`_ corporacion shall be createG co furcher che incecests of �he property ovners at I ° +�� Oh-Be-Joyful Aeres, artd co assume che cesponsihLlicy Eor che managemenc, eon[rol and tv .�•_: �j . I �•..-::ll. • '!. �Z� :?' 1 _ ~ ' �i " ti ._ .._ . r.,,. ,�a +�" ` _._..._....... .. ... . ... . ... ... . . .. .. . . � � .. . ..:. . .. .f . : r _. . �:.. . f.'�. . . '�'� I '`^��= ' ... . .. ..`,R.'�� F.; ' • . �.r:r_,.f'r� . �.�;:±_.a''�`'.¢:'.�, - , -_ � � . ,'�`� . ��:�;+ ��1.�5-1,�. ' . ,:�r.i. 'c�:_ . . • . ' . � . .a-nJ'F..r..� -. . . ,rt'F�;;h . ,.::��_��--� ._. . s:cl::>>si''�r� , .i4 p�9i,•::t^�'..�.: �(s� ' .rv:yy` :�St;e.�,: . . ?:i:i3k ;-'�...:=E> � � i`.;a:r,-::�; .xs'�z,� ;�` . . .. _ .. . .,.....�._ ' . . ,. ,` ( .. � �;:��:: . ��a��;i;�� s,r%:�:: � enforeemen[ of [he provieinns of [hese Proteceive Covenan[e of O1�-Be-Joyful Acree �"�'Y��?�� Subdivision, in accordance vich the ecrms of chis documen[, ice Arci'eles of Incorpora[ion and Bylavs. Thc ovnera of nll locn shall l+c meniLcrss anJ el�nll bc requLred co mninCatn membership in che Ilomaownera Axcociation aud ehall Ue entitled ta vote as provided !n che ArtLcles of Ineorporation of clie llomeovnera Aesociacion and shall be required •,[o pay assesswents levied by tiw Asuociacion vliich assessmenta afiall be prorated ' ns determined by che ➢oard of Direecors of che llaneovnere Assoeiotio�. If che ovner or ovnere of nny loc eha21 Cn11, nfter de�unnd, co pay any assessmenc levied by dic Oh-I{c-.l.�yful Acrur Ilomcrwnarn AxFOr.1.:�Clon, CL�:n tc xhnll havc n liun, fraw � and afccr che Ciw¢ of noeieu of suel� fallurc tu pny L� rccorded Sn cl�e ofElca of che Clerk and Recorder of PitkLn County, Cplorndo, againec [he loc or xuch owner or ovners for the amounc due nnd unpaid, pluc interes[ from the date of demand for � � _ paymenc a[ the rate of el6hceen percent(l8X) per anmun, plus all eoc[s and expe�ses • • ,,,i!�`'`� of eolleeting any unpaid asseesments, includinR reasonaLle actorney'e fees. This • � . rf+`�'..,��'-'.�'�.� lien may be Eareelosed in the mnnner ptovidcd by lau lo Colorada for foreelosurc gg _ - of deeds oE erust and mortgagns. "�� •� ihe Oa-B�ecJo�ful A�ocs � meoVn�[5 A`xo�cia6i�n sh�ll� �nnv•,v [�C1€ o nll ��:-.��.:��. l�nes enc5mpasac`a vY`FRin'FF��o"'�bp�K 5''pac°c�an"d"�5'iS��e S�r C�J�g��4�'t�1zS�t•fiks, ' uubJect to utilSCy easewen[c thereln, as designoted on che pluc oE record. Said � � Hnmewners Associa d on ahall have che respansihility chrouFh their ogent or agents �., � to maincain and eonttol the Open Space and the Driveway Access Easements, r . ZO Cnmmon L�nJx. Thc Conunon Open Spacc al�all bc walntained as n natural � �'�.--��' � ar�� ch Limiced livescock graxing, che preservation of vLldlife and chelr na�ural ��„'.�:-..�� : � habitat uieh limited recreacional use fos [be benefit of [he lot ovners in Oh-De- ('�..,�•�.:. .foyful Aeres Subdlviston. No Lmprovemencs of any kind or nacure shall be conetrucced � � or a2loved to remaA� on the Common Open Syace exeept a ciding nnd hikinR [rail, ;��..�;•: said crail shnll be closed co use Erom December through Mny of every year and nll , f 1:.�`�, - ancnrlxed vehlc]cR xhall he prohibited from [Ii1s area. Livescock Brnzing shall be ;� T�'.'� scrietly limited and eonttolled so as noc co endanger the nacural vildlife habitac. . ' 7he Common Drivevay Aeeess Easemencs nhnll he maintained as liwiced use coowon � , drlvevays and utility casemencs vich gravel curfaces for d�e use only of chose loc . ! � ovners abutcinR saLd easement. . �2L Enforeemenc Ri�hts. These covenancs may De enforaed ac any cime by che � � ovner or ovners o£ any pzopercy descrSbed hereSn, or by the Oh-Be-Joyful Aeres � NomeovneTS Asaoaia[ion. � 22. Aemedies. ihese covenanca chall be enfareeahle by proeeedSnR for prohibi- � tive or mandatory in�unc[ion. Damages shall no[ necessarlly be deened an adequace remedy tor breaeh of violacion, and, Sn an apprupria[e ceae, punitive damages may - be avarded. Ln any accion co enforce sny covenancs, eondi[Son or res[riction eoncainc � hetein, the parey nr parties bringing such aecion, iE suceessful in che action, shall � be avarded reasonableoattorneys' Eees. In the event any eonscruetlon or alceracion -� or landseapinq vork is eommenced upon any of che lands in Oh-Be-Joyful Acres in vlolatioe oE chesa eove�ancs and no action ie eownenced viChin ninety(?0) days, " chereafcer to rescrain such violation, then injunccive or eQuicable rclief shall be denied, huc �� aecion for damages shall scill be availa6le co any Parcy aF�rleve6. � Said ninecy(90)-day limiution shall noc apply to in�uettive or equicable relief - � againsi ochex violatlon of chese oovenants. � � 23. Additional ftemedy, In additlon to [he tewedies staced above, the . auchorized agents of Oh-9e-Joyful Acree Homeovnari Association, oi i[c nomiree, ' upon vfolacion oc 6reach of aay aovenant, condicinn or rescr3etior conc�ined fierein � may encer upoa any loe vhere sueh violasion or breaeh exiets snd may abace or � remove the ching arcondl'tion causin� the viola[1on or breaeh or nay ocherwise aure [Ae violacioo or breach. The coccs incurted shall•then be billed to and pald by �� che owner or ovners oE cbe loc. If.che ovner or ovnera of the loe fail, after �i' daaand, co pay such eosts, then Oh-Se-Joyful Aeres Homernmers Aseoeiacion c6a11 have a lien, from and afcer che cime of nocic¢of such Eailure co pay is recorded - in Che offiee of che Councy Clerk and Recordet of Pickin County, Colarado, againsc ��_f. che propercy of sueh ovner or ovners Eor the amounc due and urtpaid, plus interesc from che dace of demand for payment ac che rate of eighteen petcent(1Bx) per annum, plus all eos[s and expenses of cnllecting any unpaid amounc, including an,y rcasonable atcorneys' fees. This licn may be Eoreclosed Sa the manner pravidea by la� in Colorado for foreclosure of deeds oE crust and morcy,aFes. 23. Pro[eccion of fncumbran�e. No violacion or bzeach of chese Proce�cive -+ � Covenanta nnd no aecion to enforce che same shall defeat, render invalid, or lmpair � � che 7.ien of any moz[gaFe or deed oE crusc caken in gaod faich for value or [he cicle ' _ . or inceresc of che holdec chereof or the citle acqulred 6y any purchasec upon fore- . +s�-'�-� closure of any such morcgage or deed of crus�. �A . .sLy'.;�-i,� . �,��'�=��. 1}'. c�r �� ,,,-t�.... . . -�- � .�' _�s'. . ......... . . . . . . . ... .. . .� -- ... . . F. .,:,..;.... ��y. ��-,:.-,.:; _.. : ..._-.,�'��"' � .-,P��_.-r�,+.r'-�.:_. �i . ::�� . - ,-�'�:i , . ., . . . . ``t.t'_ ' _ .. „r�e.��." �- � . c , '-;;i;;%�, � • ;i'�'''i{�?'i�� :*_:;. .;:c�..n.w�;:'_:}� . .,��.,� .,,�.��. . . ;4r`:! ..��`�'.Y-;.� � ,, ,.�7;z . . �� ' � �:;�s: , , ' . � . `��17` ti . � ( Y .��. , �t � 75. Uttl RV Fo�emr.nte Reec[�cA. The undcreLgncd Lareby reeervee [o himaclf, y .`j�� ,. •.hls succeesvrs. niid nssipns, perpecunl ease�aencs fifceen(IS) feet !n vidcb.7y ft. o t .� - coeh slda af U�c boundnry lin¢ nlonp Ch¢ encire perLMC[er nf ench Int dcecrlfied on �h� �`rykL ,- � recorded placs of t6c OlrDe-JoyA�l Aerco Subdivielon, exeept any portion o[ eaLd i p¢[lmceer vhlch nbats on n dc�igna[ed p[ivnt�� JrLvevay canemen[, and all dedgnated ' utilLCy eaemnenes, nx no[c� on che nEorencncLoncJ pince, Co[ tha purpo�e of eoo- actuetion, cnaincaining, opeYnting, replacing, enlargln,g, and repairing eleecrlc, celephane, vacer, ir�lgetlon, aever, gae, and eLnllar linea, pipee, ditehes, eonduica, and/yalking and cidLog crailc. l3fi� Wa[cr SvetemF (lE'och lar ovnar elmll be required Co tap on to Che domeatic � wter systems as developeJ�an�`c�xcrueted by the undcrsignc No lot ovner exeept � for cLo ovncr of Lota 1, 7 on' 4/,uimll bc putnitced to dzill a�iy vcll of any ktnd, ' . nor �///q///h��all eny change ba mado �lr nny doneFtie vater sye�em. - � �■ co Loce 7 �nd 10 cha undcr�[�ned ehnll convey with suah lota a cotal of � � / 0.J7 eubie fect of watec per eeeond(cf�) from [he Secvart Di[ch No. 1. Dlteh L82� ��{;�1,� vPrloricy 264 vith prloricy date of Apr. 20, 1B88 so Clwse paru oE auld lau �i:� � herecofore irrigaced can .nd sl�alleontinue co be irriqated, .761 cfa eo be aonveyed °:��t � vith Lot 3 and .012 eCa to be eonveyed vich Loc !0, end said vacet righe sh�ll run �f>��=-.�:�.,. . � vich and be appurtenant co snd.noc be conveyed separately from aaid lots� � �. y ' 27. Henefit oE Covenancs. All of [he eovenanca contained �n this Sne[rument " �� : � .� /shall run vltli che Lond and ahall [erminace 21 years after ihe dace harcof, or at �� - � j' the cime of diesolutton oF Oh-Be-JoyEul Acree klomeovnecc Asseeiatrna, I�c., uhtch- f' t ever dnce ehall oceur Firs[, but may be amended by e vote of tvo-[hirds(2/7rde) �%� � �` of the voces encicled co 6e cast by the TCIAbCC9 of tl�e Oh-Oe-Joyful Acre� llomeowners�, , '�._�ociACion; subjec[, hovever, co [hc prlor �p�roval of euch termination or amendmenc by chc Eonrd of Counry Cammissioncra of Pickin Councy ea [o, and only ae co, paragceph� ��' numbered:?,5 15.1�i,17.20b2G hrreof. .-�-_J +' ' ��:' 28. Severabillcv. Eaeh of [he eovenan[s, resctictione and condicions concained� - in cheee Proceccive Covenanta ahzll be dsemed Lndependent and ecparate and che 4�`,� invalideclon of any one sI�a11 noc nffecc cha velidSry and eontinued effect of eny � ��-;� ocher. C �r'':. 2y. Paro�raph Ncadln�s. The yarngr�ph hcodinpn in thla Snacrumcnc are for �. . � convenianee only and shall noc be coneidered in conacrufng che seocriecione, eovenance nnd co�dicia�a eorteained hereLn. ��%� 30. SSncular nnd Plural. Whcrcver ucllized hcreln, che sineular e6x11 be deeaed co include tMe plural, and the plural ehall be dcemed [o Snclude che . aingular. Furchetmore, vfiereve[ utilized hcrein, the maetultne ahnll be deemed " to Snelude the femininc, and the feminina ehall be dcemed to include tl�e maaeulina. �- . 7I. ldaLver. uaiver or failure co enforee any reecrlecio�, eovenante or y eondlcion in chese proceecivn Covenanta ahall not operace aa a valver of any ' �a osher rectriecion, covenan[a or eondi[ion. � ' IN VIiNc55 171iERE0F, [ho undCraigned hsa hercunco aec Ste hand nnd seal Ch1e � ° �:�day oE . .��r..�' , l981. . ry � ��/� . � �9� f��" ,�l�,�r�w/.[.= �+ � r'�I..�fi R. Chri��4��een , � vr . � �� 57AT`-OF COLOMDO ) � ' ) ae. . . � .j CDUNiY 07 CARFLELD ) f5 � 5 } -� The ioregolnR in�crumeni we acknovledgcd beEore ne [hio_L�_dny of � _ ��+T T _, 1981 by JAN R. CHRZSTENSEN. f . / f [ � Hy nocari�l commiasion expirea on �tc !. /�SL- I . t^ � �!�./� �!,_../� � t.� .�- � � . •Hotery Publia �•� � - •7he undersigned e�cepcs and reserves co himself, his successors and asslgns � all dlcch and diceh rights and vacec und vacer righta avarded [hereto, except - � . as above provided, a�d alsa extepcs and ceserves [he rigfi[s eonveyed by � vacrancy deed daced Oec. 26, 1969 reaorded !n Oook 244 at Page 7(9 to Cregory =�.��-�'��.�, �: ,�mes Holmbec'.•„ ec ux, co cap inco U�c vacer vell in che norcherly pars of -�;a?''��•,�;,],:� � Lot J fo[ ttm purpose of o6calning vacer for use inside che hause they or ;.`.'kt�,� chcir suecessore may build. '�- 5�,. QK, �c. k� _ r �'; . _..... � ._.__._... ._ ... __.... __ ... -• - _ ..... , - �. _ . .. ._.. .... ...� . . , . _- , � t - . . . . ...._ :...� . _�...aT,..Pec. -1``f!i_''+�t;_?. . . ., � . • . .,Yx^:��:' . , _ ;�E.:t��,,. . .Z�=:.1�.f=.• _�'.:��;. ' it�i'T',n.�y-' , ' . _'•:r _• ..` . ' t ' . .•,E,��<Y _ , . _ ,. :"''>'r?:y . . - �,��..�`"'+':D�;:'': . . . � . �'�*:.•�,l'a4.•' . . :,:cS:�i%!.•ti'::i: - . :'.r"",•�,;'i=�"F.:`:: . �y��'•,,_L.l��'"?�`J: �4'��`�'�^'� ' . . �� .:�._� ,` e�/► ,<;r'� �� • . . . ,,.. .._ _ ` , � , .._ ._, ......_. ....., . . .. . � - '1 . �-��'f`:`•�, ' I�RD ASSOCIA TES R EcF 'i�::��c s is�� :,�t.;� : �t �.` :�� ' Biological Consultants a` t `�° � 5931 EVERE'I"T STREET ,p �,'1�•'• ,~r.•• ;••••",i�R'& ��N�y�ri�) r�:4�'"''(; . . ARVADA,COLORADO 80004 Ni , ��,�ti�-�' '' r':;.: : • 303/431-4749 Pu�ilic�ii::�n.:y c;:e;;;; D,p:ecember._..9,....19.89 Date:__ ��._..�.��_ Suh; �..�. ... .. R&O Partners Subi:�^t:��j�l�T}�j� . . .. �� c/o Mr. David Myler H // Exh.1a;: .w_....._.._.._.�w�� , ' . 106 5. Mill St. Fxh. ida. ,�__,T_,___ Aspen, CO 81611 �-�'�:"��" _ Re: Report - Wildlife Resources on R&O Partners Land � `�.�'�.��. � ,.,... Dear Dave: #�.�' � ` �� This letter constitutes PRD Associates report regarding wildlife resources on the property of R&O Partners near old Snowmass in Sec. 26 TSS R86W. The report is based on a brief ��`.'' � site reconnaissance performed on November 30, 1989, discussions ��'�' � with Mr. John olson of R&O Partners and you, ane� a December 4 telephone conversation c+ith Randy Cote of the Colorado Division � of Wildlife. The t+ork aas erformed and the re ort '�" , P p prepared by , ; . Dr. Peter Davis. Dr. Davis has a PhD in wildlife from the � !`' ` University of Wyoming and over 13 years of professional work ehperience, including over 10 years as a consultant in the western United States. His recent project eYperience includes field studies and report preparation for Aspen Skiing Company's proposed Burnt Mountain E:cpansion, a field reconnaissance and consultation for Morgan and Company regazding their pioposed . development of the Wildcat area, a similar scope of work for Hadid Aspen Holdings in the Aspen Meadous area, and a housing development near Conifer, Colorado. A copy of Dr. Davis' curriculum vitae is attached. The site reconnaissance xas performed on the ar�a indicated as Lot 1 on the Preliminary Plat and Site Plan provided by R&O Partners. The lot is comprised of an irrigated hay meadow on the south side with the remainder being a sagebrush flat with a small amount of oakbrush on the west side. . Mule deer tracks were scattered throughout the lot, but Nere � most abundant in the northwest corner of the lot. Elk tracks and beds were also found in the north+rest corner of the lot by the oakbrush. This makes sense since the northwest corner is in a � shallow draw and out of sight of the existing houses to the east ?" and south of Lot 1. This draw also presents a logical movement corridor for big game, particularly elk. . .`t The placement of the building envelope on the north edge of the hay meadow and netit to the existing access road on the east - side of the property should minimize impacts to big game. This ° site is out of sight of northwest corner and the proposed visual ''.'.�.==<t.:,� bnrrier should further reduce effects on those deer and elk which ':"°'�'�:;;::� use the northNest corner of the property. Since the building ' �-,:' envelope is nest to the road the drive way should be relatively `,:.��.: short which should decrease habitat disturbance and decrease the ;'��i�` ;:j; ��s. �.' _ �: .. _ - . ._ . . _ _.... �. .. �"'. � .�'� ;:' -- ,�.m..�--.-.---,.. , � - - • .:�' , , ': �. . r�. ��i�,�i}Y- _- . _�„��~'``'F":�,�'. . . '�':*•�4::. . . � wl�� "'f4_;:.''�``... .�.�'�^.�X.',:F.:'...}i, . �i�. t,.t�. •`��ur�5<•�.. ' . S.:i_``1f; t: . . .:{i.x:..�a'� . . - ♦ � �'�`� . �u� _ � �`'� -;,;�.. .. . P: .r�?"�!�. . � �'i.=�:�� " . � ��,'�',.t�ye.�, C�,:s,��,�;�y;5;` . R�cO Partners . ��"��'��` , December 4, 1989 2 of 2 effects of any additional traffic on wildlife. Proposed covenants to prevent or control pets will also help avoid impacts r�- big game. Additionally, the proposed building envelope is betKeen one existing house just to the north and another just to the south. �•, Since there are several other dNellings in the area the addition ';�';+':i��.` of one house on a 16 acre lot which can not be further subdivided � �"'•� �;ti;,� should account for an insignificant impact on deer and elk given � the Iocation of the building envelope. � �'�. Thus PRD Associates concludes that the proposed R&O Partners �. Subdivision will have an insignificant effect on uildlife in the � area. �� Sincerely, �� " P°D ASSOCIATES 1 ' �� 1 :.��"�--�... r•.s�. � Peter R. Davis, PhD � : Certified Wildlife Biologist ' ;,; attachment >-: ,, t . . . . '� ,��. ..._ i �. ,{4. •.� ! , ` � . �3: i, ` ��°�� , C . , � `:��:� 7 •J� '�4. 2 t.., _ � - „t � �..",- .., '_'... . �....:..�ie.a. . .::,,... . :.. _.._.. 2 -._."'"_ -.:s._..: _ . . - �..:.,.._ .. _.. .�.::,.: . .:... ... .....�:.- .�.-. .: .:M�� .� � � . � . . y,.,,�� . � . . , ,. ^� ' ��``a.t''+,.,, ,._. _ ., ..tia,WC ., . . .' :.�_ . ..-. ..�... . � '� . •. , - . �.' �. . �P�3Z:. ' : . -' '_, ' � �:... 'vl'tfrfSY.:i : � :. - r .___'"".+..-" . #-�F��•�.F N. � " . . . j� . _ .�Ylf��.,. .. . �- . . . . _.. �`�� iX'. . . . . . . . . � �y��i f�nx..'4��':�1 . . . . , . ' . . 1k�.� — . � - � . . ,_��a�.. . ;.�}�:y�'�"�t��''3=.,, . . t: . . : n �: � i�z�6. . . . ' . � - . . - ._\ � � _ �:K�+r'�'.�n?r - . •. . � ' � .. . ;��an`> . . . . . . _ ��'�t..e��1' . . ��.��``•, � � ' � . ;er a� , . i � � • ';k,.!°�'. ` . . . "'.r'w�'.?+:1. � �a�.< � ;. -.. .. . . . . . . _._ _ . +' �:�:1;'..:.� �- — �, PRD ASSQ�CIATES a�;�� CURRICl1LUM VITAE ��'�:':;;, ,-� Biologicai Consuitants Peter R. Davis, Ph.D. . '�J� - . Certified Wildlife Biologist 5931 EVERETT STREET � and President ARVADA,COLORADO 80004 303/431-4749 EDUCATION: B.S., Michigan Technological University, 1965 M.S., Michigan Technological University, 1968 Ph.D., University of Nyoming, 1976 ';' - . ��t:,.�. EXPERIENCE: }:2.`,' 1982-Present: �,� �i`.�, - - Preparation of wildlife impact mitigation plan for uranium mill j� !_� tailings remedial action plan near Durango, Colorado. Project inciuded �' impact assessment and negotiations with Colorado Division of Wildlife. � Species of prime importance were mule deer and elk. - Baseline surveys and impact analysis for four Cotorado gravel quarries, ;�.;: two near Colorado Springs and one each in Douglas and Jefferson {�; .. j Counties. Issues of prime importance included golden eagle nest sites, � . " mule deer winter range, and riparian habitat. � r;.`:. - 404 permit applications and mitigation plans for two housing develop- �- "�' ments near Colorado Springs, Colorado. ,,� :� - Wildlife surveys for three surface gold mines in Colorado. Projects • included baseline studies concentrating on elk and deer surtmer range. "� - Baseline surveys for ski area in Summit County, Colorado. Prime is wes <y were big game migration routes, and nongame use. ' 'a - Baseline surveys for expansion of major ski area in Pitkin County, !^ Colorado. Studies concentrated on elk winter range migration routes and � calving areas. ,� - • EIS for transmission lines in northern Montana and North Dakota. � - 8}ack-footed ferret surveys for expansion of Stapleton International � Airport in Denver, Colorado. � - EIS for proposed new major international airport in Denver, Colorado. � Main issues are endangered species (bald eagle nesting site and black- � footed ferret habitat) and raptors. . �,. - Wildlife surveys for urban drainage plan in Aurora, Colorado. - Baseline wildlife surveys for mining companies defense of CERCLA Law- °t ;i suit in southwestern Coiorado. Concentrated on big game use of area. t.° j - Baseline surveys and impact analysis for a uranium mine in northwestern Arizona. :,� 1979 - 1982: Staff Ecologist, Dames & Moore, Denver - Principal investigator for witdlife biology during preparation of 16 NEPA documents, seven site selection studies, numerous mine permit applications, and two corridor selection studies. Projects included ,-:;�.;`'`.:"'.. land acquisitions and exchanges, hazardous waste disposal, coal gasifi- , ,� ` ,�__. cation plants, gas sweetner plants, power generating stations, trans- . u- mission lines, pipe]ines, waste water treatment plants, uranium mills, 7 , '.;;��R�_. , : £:�}r�. •g- ; i. " - - , - ,nsx�,^....:.._...... ... :..._ . .o . , } - .. -z _ � . ;' . - -�� . _�_;r_� -:{:� y . ' � °.-.:33:�. - r�f.;•:�:�>:7?.: . . `:.,3,=d1_.#�r �:F'si?:e::_ . `y,'.`,".':y.:k , " � ( i ' s,µi��". _ ' • . ;^j;.�ff'� � . . - `s..Y.-1'?t'.',. , . . . �,R'��i� . _�`'"i%y.; ' . . .j��•t r,.,4...r.],-� � �,4`s..v�i:',,i.r �w 1�., _",:;'i,' . . �:t��F. � � . .;-��`i»j . �:R J;:F. ` � . ' , . ' ' . ... .,.... . . _.._�...-�._......,�f'f. . � . . Pr j�'.: (7�;?:? . ' and housing deveiopments. Project manager for two site comparison studies. Preparation of numerous proposals. Geographical Range of Experience - Projects performed in states of Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas, Utafi, and Wyoming. <'' Nov. 1977 - July 1978: ' Temporary Assistant Professor nf Animal Ecology, Iowa State University, �'';�;" - Ames. Subjects taught were Wildlife Conservation, Habitat Management, -and 6enerai Ecoiogy. Aiso advised undergraduates. �� Aug. Oct. 1977: - , . Biologist, Great Plains Resources, Sheridan, Wyoming. A temporary posi- " � tion. Gathering baseline environmental data for a Wyom.ing Permit to � Mine for a surface coaT mine. k, '. Jan. - May 1977: � Temporary Professor of Geography, University of Wyoming, Laramie. Sub- ject taught was Natural Resource Conservation. .y � � MEMBERSHIPS: Colorado Chapter of The Wildlife Society '+'�•�` I- . �, � The Wildlife Society C :. � PROFESSIONAL Treasurer, Colorado Chapter of The Wildlife Society, 1983 � 4 •� ACTIVITIES: President-elect, Colorado Chapter of The WildTife Society, i985 ' � President, Colorado Chapter of The Wildlife Society, 1986 � � Steering committee for Thorne Ecological Institute's Biennial �' " symposium on Impacted Western Wi7diife, 1984 to present �' ;� Member CoTorado b:ildlife Commission's Mitigation Working i . Committee, t966 _, � � ,3 CERTIFICATIONS: Certified Wildlife Biologist - certified by the Wildlife Society ? HEP CerYificate of Training - issued by�U.S. Fish and Wildlife � Service {� Certificate of Training - Biack-footed Ferret Search Techniques - k � issued by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service � PUBLICATIONS: Davis, P.R., 1976. Response of vertebrate fauna to forest fire '�" and clearcutting in south-central Wyoming. Ph.D. Thesis, r,� University of Wyoming, Laramie. `� 1977. Cervid response to forest fire and clear- � ' � cut �ng southeastern Wyoming. Journa] of �Wildlife Manage- . ment. 41(4): 785-788. + , 1982. The numbers game: Limitation of quantitative "--� � ran �ng schemes Yo evaluate, compare and rank various sitfng a]teroatives. Proceedings of the Western Association ,��;, of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 62:178-185. � Davis, P.R., R. Cook and W. Burkhard, 1987. Colorado's miti-• 4� � = � gation policy: How it evolved. Proceedings III: Issues and �;, k,�: techno]ogy in the management impacted western wildlife. p�`. j Thorne Ecologica] Institute. Boulder, C0. In Press. ' � „ ,� I � i .. . .�a5� �;, � '__'_"..."._"_. ..__. • : �..: ' _ .. ....,.._................ . . . . . . . . . ' r _.,. . _ � ..i� .. . . . ... . .. J�:' - a_.:.-�..--�--�_ K r.- �-��----'."�- . ,, ti.�! , - - �*.. -� ,xy_, , ,:�-.� ir::3��,�'- � .. ' ' ' . .��J�.`.cL.'� ` . .:�•�`S:r°' �;:%��<'_ . . � . . _s,�� - � . . �V,_ .�:.,.:-�..:._.. � ' .. '��'`r`:: �. • I . :. �ytis'i��. . . �f.�u'x^l;l;i; . , � . , . . :Yn•,„lryY�^ . . ��r�,��yi..�.��..�� ..�. .'ti.,�;Y,.':4;�".i.s, '„��.n�n:,.� a`1 A. .T �`'�'H'i.L[i . � . r�K4 . . ;�' � � . .. ._ .-- ...-... : � , wa ,sJ ,w : f�2.(/.2. .,�� Fr72,.9` N�r�/3c`�rL �� [7�'�� ',�i." f �� )' /�'�icE1�E� �s y � �.�.,::: /iGOs�uflcJG�� K�2G o2/� /��izE��92�eZ. i�/ �.�s$`'��'� �"zl�/ - 2SS-z/o7Z)��i ��8 � C'�iQUL�iJ 6G/�T-',�Gf%1'1L-°�L' 3�/.3q fIt/zC"S��'/12ee"C /� i 91,S-gS�o�j>/(ff�7-/i cf-.�N CoFF/''�!�->�C'j CCa2C�Gr S�G(iS ZfIC/L�,� (Er�cr= Gia�s> !'9Z3-3I90 �"�''�:-i�.••�.�-li�r,.r y�T//'n ��Sf/i2C��I C6LL(NS 39.3� R�/��S�PA2c E� i� . / 9z 3 so6vS�/Grc/f�'�r"� � SAGL� � TLG�L��G� 3%• r76 /�e.�.s��y2cEC, q .. , - �� 6 1LlCEtY1/LD (O/C�1 ��-z�cr�y�.� 56..3S �e,eES'�A2cc�s t2�l3•A 'i�..< �_ >: / ��: �� GJ/LL//FM G��}/SHGNT� `7. 2 g �lc2�s�AA2�CL / i'` �',_.` g��ir�+ �- � : - . 923-G3oo � �IL,/� G/�c�v 5 ZZ•�3 f►L'2L-S��H/C.C�ZIZ�/3-C. ": ;'. _ , : 9z3-3�v3 5�JrieK��E£ C�c f�2/�u��vi2ci,vi�w�E io,� qe2ES� ZyS9 L.2.r2. - !?9Z�7 366G k�: SLS- 6600/o� RD.(3E7LT � /NG2/O Fi•2UE%EYL, /2..9'J /g�'/2�5�LoT.Ci� Tj2(�cT Z a �. .�� //)�N'� �L�iOf.�EL� �3.�IS /�/C/LE,$�GG7.8�Ti�i'�CT /� � , ��9Z3-Z88'7 /Z lZo6C-YLT �SFtn�o /(JES /L(•Zfo ,9C/I.ES TJ2/�IC%8� � ' � y . r•::�. s: � 9Z3-S6ZZ i3 �JC��c�K977t�/ �779ND��iflill ZB.G/EtCiZ�S� LoTA iZlAcT/o �� / �y `r63-9686 /�(;)�(GF-//�/LO i<�EeHT Z z.GS/a eh6'S 4si 6� ��T iy r �' /S�LUL.��GL N ELSd� �'j�y, �Z /tC/2ES /�/f2CGZ S ' ;i � � - .� i��ANa2r� M��i-T 3�1. �i�gc�� p��e�Z y . ;•:� 92s-3�16 /�:l ��u(, � SoN/�9 /+1Ult�tH� 37.5�7 /fic2�..s� f A2Ce� � ` % ;� 9z3-s�s7 lS,Cff2i5s � ifC�"TNta'L Q2 Cc/.Sl� r/. ZY/��2ES� ypT f�� 7�'iic i l " � 923-v233/9�Tofl•� ��2/Z✓f��?/l �LSVN�2�Ul�`l2tC�5.2S1 �1/.///�E/df�Si,�f1/LCCy- /`S ' a` J .�.�9z3-Z37� �,n,n) Ross JE��"�Z��s /�. �S/�CizES� ?�ci £3!3 � �'qz3 -s�zeZ;,�v�� r�-r- �o Y�2.. /'7• �S/ac.2�s �r� ��►c r i y r.�9L 3-S6YS � Op� � -v��ca/c ' / ( ;:�9zs-SV/y ?-z),��CKRre�O �' rnrLD��D .SoDE72/jEJ� /O. AC�2C.5 f zS�g t.R?- �I !��> � qza-y76s z3 f ,Zt UEYL 2oN0 FANC/d�o./irlAi�u) Z o.Z T1��TS /Z�i��i�.B ;r. �� % � ��' 9z3- yy�, zY� TXoinAS � ��EZa Tw� ��/LE � -z�zz `.�.2. � � �.i :� qz3-Z3S� zr>Ir1�Gfl�E�. l�Joo� 3`3.68 �ie2��g92c��" � �, i � : = BOAf�O OF C� CUP4�,1'R'S " PI7t I�d C�'t��!" , �� t � put:tic Iidatt�n i;>i�;l.s `�+�� : � -�p � y � Dala: � �'--�--f- ��`": .i SubjecL• y-� .�� • -��'�!�,_�` :y . M II �,:h: -�,- Exh. t�o. �----- a �_' � �.�� _._._._..- - - ,,: __..... ........ _ _... � y _ / .£ ,, : . - ��, _ __�,-t--,-V-,----� � . ` - _�h, ,� . •- -- �x.�:�.�. _ � � , > . � �»', > . ;' �� -. 'i,: ;.+�,,, ' E'- , Lcr � a {f i '(i4.�"S?;c�' .. �.. . ' - ' , '. '.2:1'' .. ,::: -•'4Y::.;'+i.< ;�>�J.4��-:�� .. '�y.f`7,�iYT::'l�k,(�(,��' • •).�'k4;.. . v:T�3 4:: . . .L''��y'ip � . � . 41'��M � • yr�:P ` F ,, �. ... . . - .. . .......��- � . ... ..... _. . .. .. . . .. . . . ... 11s+l�is:�t.�i Gil.C6A4�1'R'S t•artir�i; •. - hq;�liid COl}�;TY �.�'�e„ . 1. I�� i ;. I'u �i �h.riring�xi�ibits r�t.a .. .//�.�-/_�~�L.._ ��u?:�;': �'•�.'z... �.f��_�,.._. JIM AND MERRILEE AUSTER .��Q�� 12/1G/89 � " RE: RESOLUT30N TO ACQUIRE HUMMINGRIRD LODE This resolutinn raises many questians. We wc�uld appreciate :;:�'t,z.- �. scme answers. � - �'f�j;;;::`. We have lived in Hunter Creek for twent �� .�,-• y years. In that tirne we h�ve been gc�od neighburs ar�d cantributed in many ways ta �!' `'� � the public's use of the are�. Until McClc�skey and Esenedic� �,',`�. started trying tc� force us c,ut for their cwn seIfish - r advantage, nur presence here did n�t effend ar�yane or - anything. To the ccmtrary, as part ef cur land use app3icatian we included an extensive valunteer c,ffer to the Forest 5ervice to perfc.rm much needed weed cc�ntrol, �� .1) irrigatia», summer and winter trail rnaintenance, and j' � canstructian c�f new foat bridges, ir� additian to what we have ¢ �, .�'j always dcne to preserwe access and pravide generai and ba;-•; amergency assistzr�ce tc� users of the area. We w�nt eur �"�'' � ;,,'� � residence here tc� be a public asset. j. � Our propc�sed ct+nstruction of a c�bin to replace the tipi has j. .'{ been vicicyusly attacked by the very peop2e who have a2ready �; � develCped this valley in the mc�st inapprepriate way and have t � attempted to deprive the public of their histc,rira2 use. ; - J �' � The cabin �nd use c�f the north access ruad will have minimal t »egative irnpact arrd we believe substantia2 pasitiv� irnpact. In our years here we have helped to save the lives of several i i,", people who might otherwise not have made it if we weren't •� available ta help. A few mc�nths ago a man fataliy in�ured � in a horseback aceident might have been saved if we had beer� j :,+ allowed to i»stall a telephone. G(' k� ��fi A singie cabin in the midst r,f this v�st area of c�pen space �i is not in�ppt-opriate. Daes anyane ob�ect t� the MacNamara � Hut? Except fCr a few pc,ssible cabin sites further up there �� is na threat of additional development. The big developmen't r� scare has Deen fabricated by McCloskey �nd Isenediet. This ,; must be the mast hypc�critical example yet of the lV.I.M,b.Y. r� syndrome. Is it fair ta �ilaw them ta da what they have dane t4,-. a while trying tc, fc•rce us �ut? Does wh�t we are prepesiny �ustify condemnation? You would not �ust be acquiring a ' piece ef real estate but would be taking away cur h�me and :�� y lifest le withc.ut a real y possiblilty �f r�epiacing it. �;,... :i y ,� This Ieads us ta the neHt questian of haw ycu propose to pay � � for replac�ment of our property. It is one �f the mast �.C: beautifui pieces of land anywhere with unlimited re�creational � "� " � �$ u..;::....,;, � a»d scenic opport�mities less than 15 minutes from town. r k.-'''...�w%':,-,� While there is no'thing quite like it� ather nice properties _ ',..:�"^.:` .�� -:>;ir'a•' .:i �.�'.�;i � : i� �� 7 W .- . ,._........ . .... .._ .. . . . . . . :� . . ... _, . � . . .. . � . .. - a; . � - . . . . F «� �, r,� - �-- . r `"�< . _��_� ,''� s c s . _ . :. r.s..},_s•X - " � ' -.. ' '`��:`-,:e_'=,.i.'i'. . � .. ' ;'.';'�:&^<'r�. '�.`r.si:,;-''??:j:., . . )iY_ fT: '- — ( �Y�_ ' r r.}�fi:s�w... � . . . -R`�-=y+q:�:::;:, .. . � . . ��`�-. � . ' . ;'�s,`�^,T� : -f.��y f��.,;. . '�`��,M . , � � � `'`'��" '� + • . � . . . _...__ _. i �":�• t:y ' '`,.....,. �.. �F,.. . —.. . .�_ - . . . . . . . ��— t , ... ....-_ ... .� . ,.t�_. . �,�.:.... :�.-..: .. .- .�. _'_''., , ' . . .. .. . . . ..., � . . .. . ... .. . _ . . , .. _ . ,.� �� i�..'. t ' . �i�� , u.ys ��: near Aspen with rc�cm fc.r hCrses sell for c�ver twu miliian. Except for a srnall reserve fund, yau h�ve nt�t budgeted any •, `new f��nds fc�r purch�se of oper, space and without voter appraval you cannc+t raise taxes. Everyane deserves an ariswer to this befc+re yau ga any furt»er ir� approving this resolutic+n, cause more in�ury to us and our chiidren, a»d '�=`•' � �=°t:: engage in expensive and unnecess�ry iitigation. Is one i',�"sc��= '_ � farniiy Iiving in the waads sucfi a threat that 3t tahes "'.�;�;;;� priarity over all the problems facing this C�unty? •,�:�':';`�� i.:'r;... f.le do nat think yau have the »eed, the legal right, the ethical �ustificaticm� ar the financial niearis to suppart a ; v : condemnatian action. We say again that we wilI seriously � " consider any fair affers or proposals but thet approval of � the use c�f eminent dumain is nc�t apprapriate ar in the cammunity's best interest. � �;., %� �:, t,:,�^ � . ' � :1 _,� :� �. � � i:� �� -. �� ;:� - �: ,:� �� ;�• :v` ':' �� t �;�� :.;1 . . � £ ' �-�� . <1.:� '�.. yy,, '� � ..` � ��:.. u.. ��: i� u;':�.,�L.::: a t`;r'q ;1 ;.:: { ' � ' i �-t--.....r:w:r'�e :: ... ._- - --- ... --•--- • _K:,�^ °�7"`,,.+ ", �+„-•+r kat k': A ` '?,,' ,.,. . ... , _.-• .....� ....,. 'r��,�'. . "54.�?.�.,4....�.- r.., - _ .,:. , ,. .-. "'..,+ar..�.+�.+"�—� f_. ��: .- . ___�_,.-��" � ��' . ,. _ _ �� :-� _ . � ,�,�»,�' . ,�x�;. � . �' _ ,,,,�. x'�,��; . . ,' ,��r,,:>, , ' , � ��: . ` .-' • _ �:� , :.,��,�� . �, ;�. �' ` "�