Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.264315400009 (2013)DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and /or P &Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P &Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (11x1') Parcel ID: 2643- 15 -4 -00 -009 Application Date: 4/25113 Case No: P042 -13 Description: MAM Aspen LLC Minor Amendment to Development Permit and Minor Plat Planner: Suzanne Wolff Amendment # Copies: 1 Allocated Hours: 4 % Over Hours: 4.8 Project Address: 0 WOODY CREEK RD, WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 Property Owner: MAM ASPEN LLC Owner's REP: ALAN RICHMAN REP's Email: arichman @sopris.net Referrals: ALL OTHER REFERRALS Comments Due Date: Meetings: list Meeting: Meeting Date: Review Body: admin Public Hearing? no Notice Date: Meeting Notes: Address: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 Address- PO BOX 3613 ASPEN, CO 81612 Owner Phone: REP's Phone: (970) 920 -1125 Other Referrals: Woody Creek Caucus 05/23/13 2nd Meeting: Approvals: BOCC Resolution #: P &Z Determination #: BOCC Ordinance #: HO Determination #. Admin Determination # 037-2013#600108 Other Information: VR Approval Date: Plat Recorded Date. 06/05/2313 VR Expires Date: Plat (Bk, PG): 8103 P19 -20 #600109 Remarks: no vesting Covenant #603526 Application Type: Minor Amendment to a Development Permit Minor Plat Amendment 3rd Meeting: RECEPTION#: 603526, 09/11/2013 at 09:31:18 AM, 1 OF 5, R $31.00 Doc Code COVENANTS Janice K. VoS Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR THE USE OF AND AGREEMENT FOR AN AGRICULTURAL BUILDING CONTRACT # T3--,2013 $ THIS RESTRICTIVE COVENANT ( "Restrictive Covenant ") is made and entered this day of J 1 2013, by MAM Aspen, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ( "Grantor" or concerning the property known as Parcel 7, Craig Ranch, Parcel ID #264315400009, located in Pitkin County, for the benefit of the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners ( "County "). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Grantor owns certain real property described as Parcel 7, Craig Ranch ( "Property "), which Property will contain an agricultural building as allowed pursuant to Sec. 5 -20 -70 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. Said agricultural building will be located as shown on the attached site plan (Exhibit "A ") and shall contain approximately 2,100 square feet of exempt floor area as approved in Building Permit No. 0038.2013.prbk. For the purposes of this Restrictive Covenant, the approved agricultural building and all appurtenances and fixtures associated therewith shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Agricultural Building"; and WHEREAS, this Restrictive Covenant imposes certain covenants upon the Property, which restrict the use of the Agricultural Building, as more particularly set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency are hereby acknowledged, Grantor does hereby grant and convey to the County, forever and in perpetuity, an interest in the Property, for and in consideration of the recitals and mutual covenants, terms, conditions and restrictions contained herein: 1. Restrictive Covenant pertaining to use of the Property. The use of the Agricultural Building shall henceforth be limited to shelter or to enclose livestock, horses, poultry, feed, or field equipment, or otherwise used for in support of an on -site agricultural operation. An indoor riding arena shall not be considered a barn. 2. Covenant running with the land: binding effect. The provisions of this Restrictive Covenant shall constitute a covenant that runs with the title to the Property as a burden thereon for the benefit of the County, its successors and assigns and shall be deemed an appurtenance to the title to such land. 3. Permitted uses and activities. As owner of the Property, the Grantor retains the right to perform any act consistent with the Land Use Code to the extent such act is not prohibited or limited by the requirements of this Restrictive Covenant. These ownership rights include, but are not limited to, the right to exclude any member of the public trespassing on the Property and the right to sell, lease, or otherwise transfer the Property to anyone Grantor chooses. Nothing herein shall be construed to be an approval by Grantee under the Land Use Code for any purpose. 6/27/2016 Pitkin County Mail-Updated Address:Meadowlark Ln �j1 K1 Y LOUNr Bonnie Shiles <bonnie.waechtler@pitkincounty.com> Updated Address: Meadowlark Ln 1 message Alex Durant <alex.durant@pitkincounty.com> Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:47 AM To: adele.l.lujan@usps.gov, William Mast <william.mast@pitkincounty.com>, bharding@basaltfire.org, Bonnie Shiles <Bonnie.Waechtler@pitkincounty.com>, Parker Lathrop <parker.lathrop@aspenfire.com>, Brian Pawl <Brian.Pawl@pitkincounty.com>, Brian Pettet <Brian.Pettet@pitkincounty.corn>, Brooke Stott <bstott@basaltfire.org>, director@pitkin911.org, Cory Garske <Cory.Garske@cityofaspen.com>, Dawn Sager<dawn_sager@cable.comcast.com>, Karla Cahill <karla.cahill@pitkincounty.com>, Debby Payne <Debby.Payne@pitkincounty.com>, Gabby Edwards <Gabby.Edwards@pitkincounty.com>, gavette@carbondalefire.org, Ginny Bultman <Ginny.Bultman@pitkin911.org>, dispatch@pitkin911.org, Janice Vos <Janice.Vos@pitkincounty.com>, Jim Wilson <jimw@basalt.net>, Joanna Schaffner <Joanna.Schaffner@pitkincounty.com>, Kathy Rogo <Kathy.Rogo@cityofaspen.com>, karen.k.heier@usps.gov, Kurt Dahl <Kurt.Dahl@pitkincounty.com>, Lea Vasten - Meredith PO <Leatrice.E.Vasten@usps.gov>, Lee Ledesma <Lee.Ledesma@cityofaspen,com>, Linda Manning <Linda.Manning@cityofaspen.com>, Mary Lackner <Mary.Lackner@pitkincounty.com>, Omaha.AMC@centurylink.com, Ray Gendron <Ray.Gendron@pitkincounty.com>, Scott Thompson <sthompson@basaltfire.org>, Sheila Babbie <Sheila.Babbie@cityofaspen.com>, Susan Pearson <Susan.Pearson@pitkincounty.com>, USPS Carbondale <carrie.katsis@usps.gov>, USPS Old Snowmass <Debra.K.Reams@usps.gov>, Vicki Monge <Vicki.Monge@pitkincounty.com>, Fran Soroka <Fran.Soroka@pitkincounty.com>, Gary Tennenbaum <Gary.Tennenbaum@pitkincounty.com>, Reza.E.Tehrani@usps.gov, Scott Mattice <Scott.Mattice@pitkincounty.com>, Tyler Lambuth <tyler.lambuth@pitkincounty.com>, Kristi Long <kristi.long@pitkincounty.corn>, Jan Patterson <jan.patterson@pitkincounty.com>, Claude Salter <claude.salter@cityofaspen.com>, Schuyler Clay <schuyler.clay@pitkincounty.com>, MARTINEZ DARLENE P <darlene.p.martinez@usps.gov>, Erlinda.J.martinez@usps.gov 4)1111iI1V CuUNT`' c-' ADDRESS NOTIFICATION Date: 5/24/2016 Effective Date: 5/24/2016 New Assigned Address: 525 Meadowlark Ln Aspen, CO 81611 Former Address: 525 Paradise Mesa Reason for Assignment: New access to a Single Family Residence Parcel ID: 264315400009 Property Owner Name: MAM Aspen LLC Note: This address update reflects the change in access to for this property which will be using an extension of Meadowlark Ln as its primary access. Paradise Mesa will remain as a secondary access route, and should be used until the new private roadway is in place. 525 https://m ai l.google.com/mai l/u/0/7ui=2&i k=661115d810&view=pt&search=i nbox&th=154e3e174c3066e2&si m l=154e3e174c3066e2 1/2 6/27/2016 Pitkin County Mail-Updated Address:Meadowlark Ln Paradise Mesa is retired and should be removed from service once the new access route is constructed. Please contact for any questions or Further Clarification. Thank You, Alex g) TKIN Alex Durant Conrail Public Safety GIS Analyst,Pitkin County Government I BITS Phone:970.429.6113 (0)// 970.309.1783 (C) GROGRArNN:INFORMATION STSTRM Email: alex.durant@pitkincounty.com Address:530 E. Main St.,Garden Level,Aspen,CO 81611 2016 -9, map.pdf 2243K Pam-�I� Pc - /3 PCG ( - !2 https:UmaiLgoogle.com!mail/u/Onui=2&ik=661115d810&view=pt&search=inbox&th=154e3e174c3066e2&simI=154e3e174c3066e2 2/2 0; IV . Z 1 H > - 7 , cD • 0 (n - I Fri I .\ 9Q a / Q • I O7- N V i . - ' .. . . . , 7 c'D . Z O � o ;:,:: Al'1(..L.jr j wv Q &,,,ak,". • I r • t --- ": 61 `f . -411111111111111.----"Iti 4/Eiti , _ N yam:. 1 C ` - • fflcNn > u, o „Airj a Oa :1.0 Q O- m a7 /c CQ,- m CD A' o ;_'i r4 ,. 1 C) f, r i ft,/ �: ...i !• J "5 O Z J �' - % H ..,....iii, 4. Enforcement and Inspection. This Restrictive Covenant and its terms and representations shall be fully enforceable by the County, its successors, assigns and agents in any action at law or equity or both, to secure compliance, including but not limited to, seeking injunctive relief and/or specific performance requiring the Grantor, its successors or assigns to cease and desist all activity in violation of the terms of this Restrictive Covenant and to return the Property to its condition prior to any violation. Moreover, the County and its successors, assigns and agents shall be permitted access to, and to enter upon, the Property at reasonable times upon at least 48 hours prior written notice to the Grantor or Grantor's representative, solely for the purpose of monitoring, inspection, and if necessary, remediation of the Agricultural Building in order to enforce and assure compliance with the terms and conditions of this Restrictive Covenant. 5. Costs and liabilities. Grantor retains all responsibilities and shall bear all costs and liabilities of any kind related to ownership, operation, upkeep, taxes and maintenance of the Property, including but not limited to, costs associated with compliance with this Restrictive Covenant. The County's acceptance of this Restrictive Covenant shall in no way be construed as an assumption of any duties or liabilities associated with the Property and Grantor acknowledges that by this Restrictive Covenant, Grantor continues to retain responsibility for any and all duties and liabilities associated with the Property. 6. Subordination. At the time of the conveyance of this Restrictive Covenant, the Grantor represents that the Property is not subject to any mortgage, deed of trust, or judgment lien, or any other instrument that might result in a foreclosure action that could affect the viability of this Restrictive Covenant. 7. Incorporation of the Land Use Code. The Land Use Code, as may be amended from time to time, and any terms or definitions contained therein, are hereby incorporated by this reference in their entirety. 8. Modification. The terms of this Restrictive Covenant can only be modified by an amended covenant executed by both Grantor and County and recorded in the records of the Clerk and Recorder for Pitkin County, Colorado. 9. Venue and jurisdiction. Grantor and the County consent to venue and jurisdiction in the District Court for Pitkin County, Colorado for all matters concerning the interpretation and enforcement of this Restrictive Covenant. 10. Attorneys fees and costs. In the event of any action or suit between the parties hereto or their successors and assigns to enforce any of the agreements, covenants or restrictions contained herein, the substantially prevailing party in any such action or suit, whether by final judgment or out of court settlement, shall recover from the other party all costs and expenses of such action or suit including reasonable attorneys fees. 11. Section headings. Paragraph or section headings within this Restrictive Covenant are inserted solely for convenience of reference, and are not intended to, and shall not govern, limit or aid in the construction of any terms or provisions contained herein. 12. Further actions. The parties to this Restrictive Covenant agree to execute such further documents and take such further actions as may be reasonably required to carry out the provisions and intent of this Restrictive Covenant or any agreement or document relating hereto or entered into in connection herewith. 13. Notices. Any notice which is required to be given under this covenant shall be given by mailing the same, certified mail, return receipt requested, properly addressed and with postage fully prepaid to any address provided herein or to any subsequent mailing address of any additional parties, as long as prior written notice of the change of address or additional parties has been given to the other parties to this Restrictive Covenant. To Grantor: MAM Aspen, LLC 600 Washington Avenue Glencoe, IL 60022 With a Copy to: Chris LaCroix Garfield & Hecht, PC 601 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 To County: Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County 530 E. Main Street, 3`d Floor Aspen, CO 81611 With Copies To: Pitkin County Attorney 530 E. Main Street, Suite 302 Aspen, CO 81611 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Restrictive Covenant as of the date and year first written above. a Delaware limited company By: b'.hfistbpher J. LaCroix, authorized representative State of Colorado ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) �f The foregoing Restrictive Covenant was acknowledged before me this day of 52013 by Christopher J. LaCroix, authorized representative of MAM Aspen, LLC, a Delaware limited liability companny. Witness my hand and official seal My commission expires on: 15lu or SASHA LYN NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #19964011120 Notary Public My Commission Expires July 18, 2016 ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM Jo . Ely unty rney ACCEPTED BY Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners By: Georg Newm , Date BOCC, Chair ,�L rn k ,* , I-S Cindy Houben, Date Community Development Director 11 lb <01J z 11i I, r i \ 3¢ � \ \ 1y\ 1 Va nd j OG 0 N O O .•i J a U J J A w Q �a RECEPTION #: 600108, 06105/2013 at 12:56:55 PM, 1 OF 4, R $0.00 Doc Code ADMIN DECISION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, APPROVING THE MAM ASPEN LLC MINOR AMENDMENTS TO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION NO. 25-2013 Administrative Decision No�R_-2013 RECITALS 1. Pursuant to Section 2- 20- 150(b) of the Land Use Code, MAM Aspen LLC ( "Applicant ") has applied to the Community Development Director of Pitkin County, Colorado ( "Director ") to amend the Site Plan approved pursuant to Administrative Decision No. 25 -2013 as follows. All changes will occur within the approved Activity Envelopes. A. The proposed residence and driveway have been shifted to the east approximately 50'. The driveway alignment has been modified and a turnaround area with a fire hydrant has been established in the auto court. B. The pond has been moved from the irrigated meadow south of the residence to an area near the entry to the property along the Craig Ranch Road on the west side of the ditch. C. The horse barn has been broken into two smaller barn buildings and has been shifted from the south side of Craig Ranch Road to the north side of the road. D. The absorption field for the on -site wastewater treatment system has been relocated to an area to the south of the tennis court. E. The location of the tennis court has been shifted slightly, but is in the same general location as previously proposed. 2. The property is located off of Woody Creek Road and is more specifically described as Parcel 7, Craig Ranch Subdivision Exemption. 3. The parcel contains 83.301 acres and is a conforming size parcel in the RS -20 zone district. 4. The Craig Ranch was divided into eight parcels, pursuant to the State's 35 acre subdivision exemption. The Board of County Commissioners (`BOCC ") rezoned Parcel I to Rural/Remote, pursuant to Ordinance No. 44 -2004, and granted 1041 hazard review and GMQS exemptions to the other seven parcels, pursuant to Resolution No. 144 -2004. The Subdivision Exemption Plat was recorded in Plat Book 79 at Page 81. The Development Agreement was recorded as Reception #525493. The 1041 hazard review site plan for Parcel 7, which depicts the building envelope, was recorded in Plat Book 79 at Page 89. The BOCC granted vested rights until October 13, 2019. Parcels 2 and 3 were subsequently merged into one parcel, pursuant to BOCC Resolution No. 043 - 2007, and the amended plat was recorded in Plat Book 88 at Page 87. 5. Resolution No. 144 -2004 establishes that Parcel 7 is exempt from growth management up to 5,750 square feet of floor area and can develop an additional 1,750 square feet of floor area up to a maximum of 7,500 square feet of floor area through the use of one TDR (which TDR may be shared with Parcels 4, 5 or 8). Administrative Decision Nog-2011 Page 2 6. The Community Development Director granted approval of the Site Plan and Activity Envelope Amendment, subject to Administrative Decision No. 25 -2013. The Site Plan has not been recorded. 7. The Director finds that the proposed amendments comply with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code, will not change the use of the proposed development or the basic character of the land, are consistent with action taken during the original review, do not increase off -site impacts or the allowable floor area, and will not endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 8. The Director further finds that all of the proposed changes will occur within the previously approved Activity Envelopes. THE DIRECTOR DOES HEREBY APPROVE the MAM Aspen LLC Minor Amendments, subject to the following conditions, which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: 1. All conditions of Administrative Decision No. 25 -2013 shall remain in full force and effect, except as amended herein. 2. Prior to submission of any future building permit applications for the property, the Applicant shall be required to submit for approval by the County Attorney and Community Development a Site Plan with an Activity Envelope in accordance with Land Use Code Section 2- 30 -20(g) and Application Manual Section 2.1.12. The above referenced approvals shall be a condition precedent to finalization and recordation of them. 3. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the application and shall consider those representations to be conditions of approval, unless amended by other conditions. The footprint of the buildings shall be substantially consistent with the site plan attached as Exhibit A, and the elevations shall be substantially consistent with the graphic representations attached as Exhibit B. APPROVED by the Director, this lkkday of 7t 2013. Ll- �%x CA— C y liouben, Community Development Director P042 -13 PID 0264315400009 fl�l�l� A N I3 lu �sa Sioe i Jg9 �9 1? (0`JI'� �'O 7Z� I 50 3 Kg� 3�a N ���. p `SSlA• ®3�a U n V E �C A9AA 33 G 3 u'i Ca? � yg 2 ` 3 g tl r I I I I� I I I i I I I I l - _ i Ilili lyI � I I I�nl i �� 3r' i Iuu1 1 1 / 3 F =Fw \\�o I ,• /�' /��/. \ wawa / z I f7 s3, = B � aw 10' e �Y tl8 Nil Imil,IIIIIIIIBI I lRRI u 8� 8� r. z 0 W J W o F O: 0-- N N K T W a m 7 ¢end N U Nom � N z CD moo L CD goy Q LLa0 Vi m C O w O U C m a N Q U J J z W CL ) V! Q N CD Q O 7 ZD O ALAN RICHMAN PLANNING SERVICES, INC. P.O. BOX 3613 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 970 - 920 -112 April 25, 2013 Ms. Suzanne Wolff, Senior Planner Pitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: MAM ASPEN LLC MINOR AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Dear Suzanne, This is an application to amend the site plan approval granted to MAM Aspen LLC for Parcel 7 of the Craig Ranch. The subject property is a parcel of land located in unincorporated Pitkin County that is approximately 83.301 acres in size. The property has not yet been assigned a street address since it is a vacant parcel of land. Its Parcel ID# is 264315400009. A vicinity map showing the .location of the subject property has been provided in the original site plan application booklet. The application is being submitted by the owner of the property, MAM Aspen LLC (hereinafter, "the applicant "). Proof of the ownership of the property is provided by the Title Insurance Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit #1. The applicant's representative for this application is Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc. A letter from the applicant confirming this arrangement is attached as Exhibit #2. We held a discussion with you prior to the submission of this application. The Pre - Application Conference Summary you issued (see Exhibit #3) states that the review procedure applicable to this proposal is as follows: Minor Amendment to Development Permit pursuant to Sec. 2 -20 -150 (b) of the Code. The pre - application form also refers to a potential change to the ranch road access to Parcels 7 and 8 but that activity is not included as part of this application. The following sections of this application describe the Code provisions applicable to this proposal and provide responses to the applicable County standards. First, however, a brief description of the property, summary of past County actions affecting the properly, and description of the proposed amendments to the site plan are presented below. 000001 of Z-5S Ms. Suzanne Wolff April 25, 2013 Page Two Background Information Parcel 7 of the Craig Ranch is one of eight parcels of land that make up the nearly 1,100 acre Craig Ranch. As shown on the vicinity map, the Craig Ranch is located on the east and west sides of Woody Creek Road, approximately 1.5 miles beyond the intersection of Woody Creek Road with Upper River Road. The original plat for the Craig Ranch was recorded in Plat Book 68 at Page 62. The plat shows that Parcels 1 -3 are located on the east side of Woody Creek Road. Parcels 4 -6 are located on the west side of Woody Creek Road, along the valley floor. Parcels 7 and 8 are also located on the west side of Woody Creek Road, but are located on the west upper mesa, adjacent to White Star Ranch and Star Mesa. All 8 parcels are more than 35 acres in size and so were created without obtaining subdivision approval. In 2004 the Craig Family submitted an application to rezone a significant portion of the property to Rural and Remote, obtain 1041 Hazard Review to establish building envelopes on the parcels, and obtain various Growth Management exemptions to establish the development rights on the parcels. The Board of County Commissioners granted these approvals pursuant to Resolution 144 -2004 (see Exhibit #4). Included within those approvals was a determination that Parcel 7 would be permitted to develop up to 7,500 sq. ft. of floor area. A number of documents were recorded following the BOCC approval. These documents include the Development Agreement for the Craig Ranch Parcels, recorded as Reception No. 525493, the First Amended Plat of the Craig Ranch, which is recorded in Plat Book 79 at Page 81, and the 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan for Parcel 7 of the Craig Ranch, which is recorded in Plat Book 79 at Page 89. In 2012 the applicant submitted a land use application requesting a minor amendment of the activity envelope that had been designated for Parcel 7. The application also requested site plan approval for the development of the property. The site plan included development of a main residence, two barns, a tennis court, a pond and an area for ground mounted solar energy collectors. This application received administrative approval from the Community Development Director pursuant to Decision _ -2012 (see Exhibit #5; still as yet not recorded). A site plan documenting the approval has not yet been recorded. Prior to recording the site plan the applicant has identified several minor refinements to the site plan that are either consistent with, or enhancements of, the recently granted site plan approval. Therefore, this application has been prepared, with the attached amended site plan, to request land use approval of these refinements before a building permit application is submitted to develop the property. Following is a brief summary of the refinements that are proposed. 000002 Ms. Suzanne Wolff April 25, 2013 Page Three 1. Residence and Driveway. The proposed residence and associated structures have been shifted back on the site by a short distance (less than 50'). This moves the primary building envelope back to nearly its originally location on the Craig Ranch Plat. The alignment of the driveway that will serve the new residence has also been modified and a turn - around area with a fire hydrant has been established in the auto court, designed to comply with the standards for emergency vehicles. 2. Pond. The approved site plan showed a pond that would be located below the house, in the irrigated meadow. This location is being abandoned and replaced with a new location near the entry to the property along the Craig Ranch Road. This means that the planned disturbance to the irrigated meadow will not occur, leaving it as an intact, contiguous agricultural feature on the property. The activity envelope continues to include a portion of the meadow, principally because the well is located in the meadow and utility lines will be installed between the well and the new residence. 3. Agricultural Buildings. The approved site plan showed two agricultural buildings, including a small equipment -type building adjacent to the house and a larger horse barn near the entry to Parcel 7. The equipment building has not changed in location or size in the amended site plan, but the horse barn has been broken into two smaller barn buildings and has been shifted across the Craig Ranch Road (although it is still within the approved activity envelope), for a total of three agricultural buildings on the site plan. The total amount of agricultural square footage will remain within the parcel's limit of 4,814 sq. ft. (83 acres x 58 sq. ft. per acre = 4,814 sq. ft. allowed). 4. Septic Field and Tennis Court. The absorption field has been relocated within the overall activity envelope, to an area near the west property boundary. The tennis court location has been adjusted slightly but is rather close to where it was previously shown. A letter has been obtained from Suzanne Farver, the neighbor who is closest to these planned facilities, supporting these adjustments to the overall site plan (see Exhibit #6). The conformance of these proposals with the applicable standards of the Land Use Code is addressed in the following two sections of this application. Minor Amendment to Development Permit Staff has informed the applicant that the above - described proposals can be processed as a minor amendment to a development permit. Section 2 -20 -150 (b) of the Land Use Code authorizes the Community Development Director to grant a minor amendment to a development permit if it meets the following criteria: 1. Is consistent with action(s) taken during previous development approvals for the property. 000003 Ms. Suzanne Wolff April 25, 2013 Page Four Response: The proposed amendments are consistent with the original site plan approval. The house is actually moving back closer to where it was originally approved by the County. The pond, barns, tennis court, and absorption field, while changed to varying degrees in location, will all remain within the previously- approved building envelope. 2. Does not change the use of the proposed development between residential, commercial and tourist accommodation uses. Response: No change in use is proposed. The approved use will remain as single family residential. 3. Does not change the basic character of the approved use of land on which the activity occurs including basic visual appearance and method of operation. Response: The proposal will not change the basic character or visual appearance of the property. Development will still be confined to the approved building envelope. The scenic analysis that was presented as part of the site plan review demonstrated that given the distance from public roads, the improvements will have a negligible visual impact. 4. Does not constitute a new land development activity. Response: The proposed minor amendments do not constitute a new land development activity. Rather, they propose a minor change to an approved site plan. 5. Does not increase off -site impacts in the surrounding neighborhood. Response: The proposed amendments will not increase off -site impacts since all of the relocated elements will remain within the approved envelope and will be of the same magnitude (same number of units, same size of residence, same amount of bam square footage, etc.) as was previously approved. As you have requested, we have provided a letter from the closest neighbor supporting the proposed amendment, indicating that the neighbor does not view the amendments as increasing impacts upon her property. 6. Does not endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 7. Does not violate any Land Use Code standard. Response: The proposal does not violate any Code standard nor will it endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 8. Does not substantially increase the need for on -site parking or utilities, or affect affordable housing generation. 000004 Ms. Suzanne Wolff April 25, 2013 Page Five Response: The proposed amendments have no impacts on the need for parking, utilities or affordable housing. 9. Does not increase the floor area of the use by more than five percent (5 51o) or decrease the open space on the site by more than five percent (5%). Response: The proposed amendments do not change the site's floor area or open space calculations. Conclusion I believe that this letter and the attached exhibits and drawings provide the information you need to process this application and demonstrate that the proposed amendments comply with the standards of the Land Use Code. We look forward to receiving the staffs administrative decision as soon as possible so the applicant may submit for a building permit for the project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you find there is anything else you require. Sincerely, ALAN RICHMAN PLANNING SERVICES, INC. Alan Richman, AICP Intl EXHIBITS 11 11: 1' i i- r� r' r r r, r r r r' r r r r r r r r r• r r r r r r r EXHIBIT #1 Owner's Policy of Title Insurance — Schedule A Issued by Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: Westcor Land Title Insurance Company, 201 N. New York Avenue, Suite 200, Winter Park, Florida, 32789 State: CO County: PITKIN Address Reference: WOODY CREEK ROAD, WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 Fite No.: PCT23443W5 Amount of Insurance: $6,750,000.00 Date of Policy: June 8, 2012 @ 1:06 PM Policy No.: OP- 6- CO1045.01- 2712085 Premium: $ 5,568.00 Simultaneous* N/A Reinsurance * 12 -346 1. Name of Insured: MAM ASPEN LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 2. The estate or interest In the Land that is insured by this policy is: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. Title is vested in: MAM ASPEN LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4. The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: PARCEL7, FIRST AMENDED PLAT OF CRAIG RANCH PARCELS, according to the Plat thereof recorded June 20, 2006 In Plat Book 79 at Page 81. Together with the access easement as set forth in Easement Agreement recorded March 9, 2004 as Reception No. 495282. 14 Issued By Authorized Signatory 000007 EXHIBIT #2 Ms. Suzanne Wolff, Senior Planner Pitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: MAM Aspen LLC Minor Amendment to a Development Permit and Plat Dear Ms. Wolff, We hereby authorize Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc. to act as our designated representative with respect to the land use application being submitted to your office for our property, Parcel 7 of the Craig Ranch. Mr. Richman is authorized to submit an application to Pitkin County for a minor amendment to the site plan approval previously issued to us and a minor amendment to the subdivision plat for the Craig Ranch. He is also authorized to represent us in meetings with Pitkin County staff and the County's review bodies. Should you have any need to contact us during the course of your review of this application, please do so through Alan Richman Planning Services, whose address and telephone number are included in the land use application, or you may contact us via our attorney, Mr. Chris LaCroix. Sincerely, VIA, P'lU f-L-� MAM Aspen LLC Martha and Adam Metz 000008 EXHIBIT #3 PITKIN COUNTY PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Suzanne Wolff PHONE: (970) 920 -5093 LOCATION: Parcel 7, Craig Ranch APPLICANT: MAM Aspen LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Alan Richman DATE: 2/25/13 E -MAIL: suzanne.wolff(cDco.pitkin.co.us PID# 264315400009 EMAIL: arichmanasooris.net Type of Application: Minor Amendment to Development Permit and Minor Plat Amendment Description of Project/Development: Applicant is requesting to amend the plat to revise the access easement to Parcel 8, and to amend the Site Plan to relocate the pond, barn and septic system, and to shift the building envelope and driveway. Land Use Code Sections to Address: ➢ 2- 30- 20(8)(5): Minor Plat Amendment ➢ 2- 20- 150(b), Minor Amendment to Development Permit Review by: Community Development Director Public Hearing? NO Staff will refer to: Woody Creek Caucus FEES: $1,273 (make check payable to " Pitkin County Treasurer') • $1,248 Planning flat fee (non - refundable; based on 4 hours of staff time; if staff review time exceeds 4.8 hours, the Applicant will be charged for additional time in excess of 4 hours at a rate of $312 /hour) • $25 Clerk Technology Fee To apply, submit 1 copy of the following information: 1. Summary letter explaining the request, summarizing prior approvals and addressing compliance with the Code sections listed above. 2. Draft Amended Plat and Site Plan (24" by 36" and 11" by 17 ") 3. Disclosure and proof of ownership of the property, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company or attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property and all mortgagees, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting use and development of the parcel and proof of the owners right to use the land for the purposes identified in the development application. 4. Street address (if any) and parcel description, including legal description, and 8 -1/2 "x 11" vicinity map locating the subject property within Pitkin County; 5. Total fee for review of the application 6. Executed Pitkin County Community Development Agreement for Payment of Land Use Application Fees (form attached); 7. Consent from owner(s) to process application_ and authorizing the representative (1 copy) 8. Copy of this preapp form (1 copy) 00000`7 PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF LAND USE APPLICATION FEES PITKIN COUNTY (hereinafter COUNTY) and MAM Aspen LLC (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for Activity Envelope and Site Plan Review (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Pitkin County Ordinance No. 30 -2009 establishes a fee structure for land use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. The fee structure is based on the County's policy that development shall pay, in full, the cost of development review in Pitkin County. Fees have been set to be consistent and fair to the public and to reflect the expense incurred in providing such services to the public. 3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it may not be possible at the time of application to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. 4. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that fees charged for the processing of land use applications shall accumulate if an application includes more than one type of land use review. 5. COUNTY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for COUNTY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and /or Board of County Commissioners to enable the Planning Commission and /or Board of County Commissioners to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 6. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the COUNTY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay a base fee in the amount of $1,273 which is based on 4 hours of staff time. If actual time spent by staff to process the application exceeds the average number of hours by more than 20 %, then the COUNTY will bill the APPLICANT quarterly for the additional time spent. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. PITKIN COUNTY � ,/ APPLICANT b' a ` /1 MAM Aspen LLC Cindy Houben Community Development Director Signature Mailing Address: c/o Chris LaCroix 601 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 000,010 EXHIBIT #4 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PTTKIN COUNTY, COLORADO GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE CRAIG RANCH SPECIAL REVIEW, 1041 HAZARD REVIEW, CONCEPTUAL SUBMISSION AND GMQS EXEMPTION AND REMEDIATING THE TAKING FOR PARCELS 2 AND 3 Resolution No. 6L -2004 RECITALS 1. Ute City Limited, Carol Gallun Craig Family Trust, and Carol Craig ( "Applicant ") have applied to the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado ( "BOCC ") for approval to develop 6 new single family residences and 4 caretaker dwelling units on 8 separate 35+ acre parcels, as follows: A. Parcels 1 -3 are located on the east side of Woody Creek Road. Parcel I contains portions of the Vagneur Mountain hillside, and is proposed to be rezoned to Rural /Remote in order to obtain TDRs to utilize for the on -site development. The development on Parcels 2 and 3 will be limited to a maximum of 5,750 square feet of floor area. ® B. Parcels 4 -6 are located on the west side of the mad on the valley floor. Parcel 4 contains the existing Craig residence and other structures. Residential development on these parcels will be limited to a maximum of 7,500 square feet of Floor area. ®C. Parcels 7 and 8 are located on the west mesa adjacent to White Star Ranch and Star Mesa. ® Residential development on these parcels will be limited to a maximum of 7,500 square feet of floor area. 2. The following approvals are requested and required: ® A. Rezoning of 306 acres of the ranch to Rural/Remote; B. 1041 Hazard Review and Conceptual Submission to establish building envelopes; ® C. GMQS Exemption to replace one single family dwelling unit on Parcel 5; ® D. GMQS Exemption and Special Review to establish Parcels 2, 6 and 8 as TDR receiver sites for initial development rights and Parcels 4 -8 as TDR receiver sites for additional floor at= ® E. GMQS Exemption and Special Review for caretaker dwelling units on Parcels 5 -8. ® 3. The property is located on Woody Creek Road, and is described as Parc % 2 -8 of the Craig Ranch ® Parcels, as shown on the plat recorded in Plat Book 68 at Pages 62 -64 (reception #495281). 4. The property is comprised of eight separate 35+ acre parcels, all of which are zoned RS- 20 /PUD and contain a total of 1,084 acres. 5. The Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission ( "Commission') considered the proposed application at a regularly scheduled meeting on July 6, 2004, and recommended approval of Parcels 4 -8 by a vote of 5 -0. In addition, the Commission recommended denial of development of Parcels 2 and 3 by a vote of 5 -0. 6. The BOCC considered this application at a duly noticed public hearing on September 8, 2004, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to the application. The BOCC continued the public hearing for Parcels 4 -8 to October 13, 2004. 7. The BOCC denied the request for Parcels 2 and 3 on September 8, 2004, pursuant to Resolution No. 133 -2004. The BOCC found that the required improvements to the existing access roads that will II1 1 Page: 021 0 0009:25F 0 000011 is 1r Resolution No. /tH -2004 Puge 2 serve the building envelopes on Parcels 2 and 3 would encroach on slopes in excess of 30 %, which is prohibited pursuant to sub - section 3- 80- 050.C.I.c.ii of the Land Use Code ( "Code "). 8. The Applicant submitted a request for a takings determination pursuant to Sections 3 -290, 4 -150 and 5 -220 of the Land Use Code to determine whether the BOCC's denial of Parcels 2 and 3 constitutes a taking of private property without just compensation. The BOCC considered the takings request at a regular meeting on September 22, 2004. at which time further evidence and testimony were presented r with respect to the taking. 9. The BOCC determined that a taking had occurred pursuant to Sections 3 -290 and 4 -150 of the Code, based on the following findings: A. Parcels 2 and 3 cannot be accessed from Woody Creek Road without crossing slopes in excess of 30 %; B. The existing ranch roads were legally created and traverse previously disturbed slopes in excess of 30 %; C. The existing ranch roads do not currently meet the County's minimum standards for width and grade for driveways, and improvements to meet these minimum standards are required in order to ® develop single family residences within the building envelopes; D. The proposed building envelopes on Parcels 2 and 3 avoid slopes in excess of 30 %, the wildfire hazard is low and can be mitigated, and impacts on wildlife habitat areas can be mitigated. E. The denial constitutes a taking of all reasonable use and economic return from the subject properties. 10. The BOCC considered the remediation for the takings for Parcels 2 and 3 on October 13, 2004. 11. The BOCC finds that the proposed building envelopes avoid slopes in excess of30 %, that the wildfire hazard is low and can be mitigated, and that the impacts on wildlife habitat areas can be mitigated. ® 12. The BOCC further finds the development is consistent with the special review criteria for TDR receiver sites, and that the proposed development otherwise complies with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code. ® 13. The BOCC further finds that there is a development r �;ht associated with the East Mesa parcel, based on ® the County's ownership of Woody Creek Road and tda resulting subdivision of the property by the road; ® this development right will be utilized on Parcel 3. In addition, there are existing development rights associated with Parcel 4 (fathering parcel right associated with Tract 1), Parcel 5 (right associated with replacement of the existing residence) and Parcel 7 (right associated with a pre -1978 parcel described as ® Tract 2). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the BOCC that the denial of the Parcels 2 and 3 ® of the Craig Ranch constitutes a taking pursuant to Sections 3 -290 and 4 -150 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the BOCC that it does hereby remediate the takings for Parcels 2 and 3 and approve the Craig Ranch Parcels 2 -8 1041 Hazard Review, Conceptual Submission, Special Review and GMQS Exemption, subject to the following conditions, which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest. IIIIIII VIIIIIIIII VIII IIIIII III IIIIIII III VIII /III of 7 /III 50/02 ©040 2 9:259 000012 Resolution No. "// 9004 Page) 1. The Applicant shall adhere to all materinl representations made in the application or in public meetings or hearings and shall consider those representations to he conditions of approval, unless amended by other umditions 2. Prior to submission of any earthmoving, access, ISDS or building permit applications, the Applicant shall: ® A. Submit a 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan(s) to the Community Development Department for approval and recording. The owner must sign the mylar copy of the site plan prior to submittal for recording. ® The Applicant shall amend the site plan as follows, prior to submission for recordation: ® I ) Designate a building envelope around the existing improvements on Parcel 4. 2) 'file building envelopes and access shall be depicted at a scale of no smaller than I" = 50': 3) Include the location and dimensions ol'building envelope setbacks from property lines, and /or tie in the boundaries of the building envelopes to a permanent marker. ® 4) Relocate the building envelope on Parcel 2 below the 7,900 foot elevation contour. ® B. Work with the Environmental Health Department to produce a PM 10 mitigation plan containing specific, enforceable control measures and documenting that the proposed mitigation measures will fully mitigate for all PM 10 increases in the nonattainment area caused by the development. ® 3. Prior to recordation of the 1041 site plan and associated documents, the Community Development Department shall inspect the apartment on Parcel 4 to verify that it no longer qualifies as a "dwelling unit" as defined in the Land Use Code. 4. Concurrent with recordation of the 1041 site plan(s), the Applicant shall: ® A. Record a Development Agreement to memorialize the conditions of approval and representations made in the application, including the voluntary commitment to make a cash -in -lieu payment for affordable housing mitigation if the residences on Parcels 6 and S exceed 5,750 square feet of floor ® area, based on the Housing Guidelines in effect at the time of building permit application. The Development Agreement shall govern the uses and development of the parcels. B. Record a covenant in a form acceptable to the County Attorney and the Historic Preservation Officer which identifies the historic structures on the property (main ranch house, small barn structure below the house, and abandoned Clavel homestead house on Parcel S) and in which the Applicant agrees to prohibit demolition of the historic structures, to stabilize the Clavel house, and to ensure that any alterations or additions to the historic structures would be subject to review by the I listoric Preservation Officer in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards ® for Rehabilitation. C. Obtain Irrevocable Certificates of MRS from Parcel I, and execute and record the deed restriction against further development of Parcel 1. D. Grant a 60' right -of -way to the County, measured 30' to either side of the centerline of Woody Creek Road. 5. Prior to submission of an ISDS permit for each parcel, the Applicant shall provide documentation of adequate quality and quantity of water to the Environmental Health Department. Wells must be located within the building envelopes, or in a location approved by the Community Development and Environmental Health Departments. 6. Parcels 3. 4, 5 and 7 are exempt from growth management up to 5,750 square feet of floor area. ©02/2004 ©0 IIIIIIIVIIIIIIIIIVIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIS 9:259 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO A 0. a is ._..U0L0 11111111111111 HIM 111 111111111 IN 12/02/2004 09:25; 000014 SILVIR DAMS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 0.00 0 0.00 Resolution No.Iff -2004 Pgge 4 7. At building permit application for a new residence on each of Parcels 2, 3, and 5 -8, or an expanded residence on Parcel 4, the Applicant shall: A. For Parcels 6 and 8 only, submit one or two executed Irrevocable Certificate(s) of TDRs to allow up to 5,750 or 7,500 square feet of floor area, respectively, on each parcel, and a copy of the deed evidencing conveyance of the Certificates) to the Applicant (if applicable). B. For Parcels 4, 5 and 7 only, submit executed Irrevocable Certificate(s) of TDRs to allow in excess of 5,750 and up to 7,500 square feet of floor, and a copy of the deed evidencing conveyance of the Certificate to the Applicant (if applicable). C. For Parcel 2, submit one executed Irrevocable Certificate(s) of TDRs to allow up to 5,750 square feet of floor area, oil the parcel, and a copy of the deed evidencing conveyance of the Certificate(s) to the Applicant (if appl icabl e). 8. The Applicant may divide the 7,500 square feet obtained from three TDRs from Parcel I among Parcels 4 -8 in order to add 1,750 square feet of Floor area to each parcel beyond the 5,750 square feet of floor area obtained with the initial development right for each parcel. Any TDRs that are conveyed for use other than on the Craig Ranch shall not be fractionalized — each TDR shall provide either an initial development right or additional floor area for one parcel or lot. I� 9. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residence on each parcel, or an expanded residence on Parcel 4, the Applicant shall: A. Pay the applicable road impact fee. B. Obtain a fireplace/woodstove permit from the Community Development Department. p C. Submit a drainage and erosion control plan for review and approval by the County Engineer. D. Obtain ps an access permit for a new driveway and/or improvements to existing roadways, which shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Aspen Fire Marshal. The Applicant shall submit a County Right-of-Way Permit for any improvements to the intersections of the driveways within the Woody Creek Road right-of-way. Improvements to the existing roads on Parcels 2 and 3 may occur on slopes in excess of 30% as necessary to comply with the County's standards for width and grade. F. Obtain a site specific foundation investigation for Parcel 6 to determine if the soils are subject to hydrocompaction. F. Obtain ISDS permits from the Environmental Health Department, if required. The systems must be designed by a registered professional engineer, shall be located within the building envelopes or a location by Community approved the Development and Environmental Health Departments, and must comply with the setback requirements from surface and groundwater sources. The engineer shall perform percolation tests during high runoff in the area of the proposed leach field to confirm the height of the water table. G. If the residence exceeds 5,000 square feet, submit a ,rraffic and Parking Management Plan in accordance with the Asset Management Plan for review and approval by the County Engineer. H. For Parcels 7 and 8, obtain an evaluation of the bridge across Woody Creek by a qualified structural engineer to determine any specific loading limitations. 10. Each of Parcels 4 -8 shall be limited to a maximum of 7,500 square feet of floor area; agricultural buildings on Parcels 4 -8 shall be exempt from the calculation of floor area. Each of Parcels 2 and 3 shall be limited to a maximum of 5,750 square feet of floor area, inclusive of all structures. H. No development, including grading, excavation, fill placement, landscaping, vegetation removal or disturbance, septic system and well, shall occur outside of the approved building envelopes, except to comply with the required wildfire mitigation. Well, septic system and landscaping may occur outside of the building envelope in a location approved by the Community Development Department. H® I IIIIII111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 504705 11111111111111 HIM 111 111111111 IN 12/02/2004 09:25; 000014 SILVIR DAMS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 0.00 0 0.00 w Resolution No. IUy -2004 Page .i 12. All areas outside of the building envelopes that are disturbed by construction sltall be revegetatod with native shrubs and grasses to limit water consumption and additional runoff within one growing season of the project's completion. Only plant species listed in the Pitkin County Revegetation Guide (or species native to the site) shall be utilized to revegetate these areas, subject to a revegetation plan approved by the Natural Resources Division prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 13. Exterior lighting shall comply with the County's lighting regulations in effect at the time of installation, 14. The Applicant shall comply with the following measures to mitigate impacts to wildlife: A. Native vegetation shall be maintained outside of the building envelopes, except for agricultural crops. B. Provide waste storage that complies with BOCC Ordinance No. 010 -2001. Verification of compliance shall be provided prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. C. Avoid fruit - bearing trees and shrubs in any landscaping. D. An orange safety fence shall be installed around the building envelope to prevent any unnecessary vegetation disturbance during construction. E. Dogs shall be kenneled on Parcels 4 -8. Dogs shall be prohibited on Parcels 2 and 3. F. All new fencing outside of the building envelopes that is not necessary for livestock retention shall comply with the following: I ) Wood fencing shall employ three rails or less, be the round or split rail type, shall not exceed 48 inches in height above ground level and 12 inches in width (top view), and shall have at least 18 inches between two of the rails. 2) Wire fencing shall consist of no more than 3 strands of smooth wire and shall not exceed 42 inches in height. 3) Existing fencing shall be brought into compliance. G. Horse hay shall be fenced at the owner's expense with 8' game -proof fencing and other feed shall be kept in bear -proof containers. li. No riparian vegetation shall be damaged or removed. 15. The Applicant shall comply with the following wildfire mitigation standards: OOU015 A. For a distance of 15 feet around all structures establish and maintain vegetation at 6 inches or less, with mowed grass, low growing perennials or some type of hardscape (e.g., sidewalk, pavers, rock mulch). B. Beyond the I5 -foot perimeter and up to 30 feet keep grass mowed to a height of 6 inches or less. C. Future landscaping within 100 feet of any structure shall be spaced no closer than 10 feet from the outermost branches. The lower limbs of conifers should be removed up to 10 feet or half the total height of the plant to eliminate ladder fuels. D. Roofs shall be constructed with a Class A roof covering or a Class A assembly as defined in the International Building Code (IBC) Section 1505.2. Wood shake/shingle roof coverings are prohibited in all wildfire hazard areas. Roofs with less than a 3:12 pitch are not permitted unless they comply with the following: I ) All roof coverings shall be constructed of non - combustible materials and installed on a Class A roof assembly. 2) All roof coverings shall have a surface that shall facilitate the natural process of clearing the root. 3) All roof designs shall facilitate the natural process of clearing roof debris. Protrusions above the rooFline, such as parapets, shall be prohibited. 504705 0I /4 9 :25C SILVIQ DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 0.00 0 0.00 W Resolution No. ZYY-2004 Page 6 4) Roofs shall be installed as required by the approved building code and shall have a minimum slope of 1:48. 5) All roof designs, coverings or equivalent assemblies shall be specifically approved by the Fire Marshal prior to submittal of a building permit application. F. Vents shall be screened with corrosive resistant wire mesh with mesh 'G inch maximum. F. Roofs and gutters shall be kept clear of debris. G. Yards shall be kept clear of all litter, slash, mid flammable debris. H. All Flammable materials and firewood/wood piles shall be stored on a parallel contour a minimum of 15 feet away from any structure. I. Swimming pools or ponds shall be accessible to Fire Department vehicles. J. Fences shall he kept clear of brush and debris. K. Wood fences shall not connect to the structure. L. Fuel tanks shall be installed underground with an approved container. M. Propane tanks shall be installed according to NFPA 48 standards and on a contour away from the structure with standard defensible space vegetation mitigation around any above- ground tank. Any wood enclosure around the tank shall be constructed with materials approved for 2 hour tire- resistive construction on the exterior side of the walls. N. Each structure shall have a minimum of one 10 pound approved ABC fire extinguisher placed in a visible and accessible location. O. Addresses shall be clearly marked with 2 inch non - combustible letters and shall be visible and installed on a non - combustible post. P. New utility lines shall be buried within roadways. 16. The Applicant shall comply with the County's Noxious Weed Management Plan. 17. The Applicant may construct a caretaker dwelling unit on each of Parcels 5 -8, subject to the following: A. The CDU shall be limited to 700 net livable square feet. The kitchen shall contain a minimum of a two burner stove with oven, standard sink, and at least a 6 cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer. A minimum of one off -street parking space shall be provided for the unit. B. Prior to submission of a building permit for the caretaker unit, the Applicant shall obtain and the Housing Office shall record a caretaker dwelling unit deed restriction. Actual floor plans of the unit shall be submitted to the Housing Office with the deed restriction. C. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the caretaker dwelling unit, the Housing Office shall inspect the unit. D. The floor area of the CDU shall count towards the total allowable floor area on the parcel. 18. Statutory vested rights for the approval contained herein are granted pursuant to the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Colorado Statutes, subject to the exceptions set forth in Pitkin County Land Use Code, 4 4-140 and C.R.S., § 24 -68 -105. The statutory vested rights granted herein shall expire on October 13, 2019. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIE 504 I1111 5 ©5' 12/02/2004 09 :259 SILVIA DAVIS PtTKIN COUNTY CO R 0.00 D 0.00 000016 Resolution Nn. iyy -2004 Page 7 A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES WEEKLY on the 8 "' day of August, 2004. APPROVED AND ADOPTED on the 13 "' day of October, 2004. PUBLISHED AFTER ADOPT V ION FOVSTED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS in the Aspen Times Weekly on the'0 day of u 2004. Jones, Clerk1�) the BOCC AS TO G4 C Ifidy Houben Community Development Director BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO By x ��c2 Z�ai Dorothea Farris, Mair APPROVED AS TO P049 -04 PID # 264314100003,264315302004, 264315302002, 264315400009 ,264315302003,264314100002, 264323300006 504705 I IIIIII VIII �IIIII VIII IIIIII III CO III VIII IIII lll� 0 e04 09: zsc 0 0.00 1 000017 1 EXHIBIT #5 ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF PITIQN COUNTY, COLORADO, APPROVING THE MAM ASPEN LLC ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AMENDMENT AND SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative Decision No. -2012 RECITALS 1. MAM Aspen LLC ( "Applicant ") has applied to the Pitkin County Community Development Director ( "Director") to construct a single family residence and accessory uses. The Applicant proposes to change the location of the building envelope for the residence and to establish a larger activity envelope to accommodate accessory structures including two barns and a tennis court, the driveway, a pond, landscaping on -site wastewater treatment system and buried water storage and propane tanks. 2. The property is located off of Woody Creek Road and is more specifically described as Parcel 7, Craig Ranch Subdivision Exemption. 3. The parcel contains 83.301 acres and is a conforming size parcel in the RS -20 zone district. 4. The Craig Ranch was divided into eight parcels, pursuant to the State's 35 acre subdivision exemption. The Board of County Commissioners (`BOCC ") rezoned Parcel I to Rural/Remote, pursuant to Ordinance No. 44 -2004, and granted 1041 hazard review and GMQS exemptions to the other seven parcels, pursuant to Resolution No. 144 -2004. The Subdivision Exemption Plat was recorded in Plat Book 79 at Page 81. The Development Agreement was recorded as Reception #525493. The 1041 hazard review site plan for Parcel 7, which depicts the building envelope, was recorded in Plat Book 79 at Page 89. The BOCC granted vested rights until October 13, 2019. Parcels 2 and 3 were subsequently merged into one parcel, pursuant to BOCC Resolution No. 043 -2007, and the amended plat was recorded in Plat Book 88 at Page 87. 5. Resolution No. 144 -2004 establishes that Parcel 7 is exempt from growth management up to 5,750 square feet of floor area and can develop an additional 1,750 square feet of floor area up to a maximum of 7,500 square feet of floor area through the use of one TDR (which TDR may be shared with Parcels 4, 5 or 8). 6. The Director finds that the relocation of the building envelope for the primary residence approximately 200' to the south is consistent with the prior approval, as it is located in the same general area on the parcel, will have the same basic shape and size, and does not create any additional impacts on constrained areas. 7. The Director further finds the proposed Activity Envelope to accommodate accessory structures including two bams and a tennis court, the driveway, a pond, landscaping, well, on -site wastewater treatment system and buried water storage and propane tanks complies with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code ( "Code ") as follows: A. The Activity Envelope primarily contains slopes of less than 30 %. Slopes in excess of 30% within the envelope are found in linear areas along the irrigation ditches and are man -made anomalies in an otherwise continuous slope of less than 30 %. The Code permits development in these areas of slopes in excess of 30 %, pursuant to Sec. 70- 20- 20(c)(3). 000018 Administrative Decision No. _ -2012 Page 2 B. The wildfire hazard is low, and will be mitigated as required in Resolution No. 144 -2004. C. The Activity Envelope avoids wildlife habitat areas. There is mapped mule deer winter range in the southeastern comer of the parcel, and mapped elk winter to the southeast of the parcel. Mitigation of impacts on wildlife is included in Resolution No. 144 -2004. 8. The Director further finds that the Applicant has satisfied the standards of Sec. 7- 20- 120(d) and (e) of the, the Standards for Development Within Scenic View Protection Areas and the Rural Character Guidelines as follows: A. Any development within the building and activity envelopes will be visible from certain points along Highway 82 and McLain Flats Road, but at a substantial distance (in excess of one mile from Highway 82 and 4,000 linear feet from McLain Flats Road). The property sits in the visual backdrop adjacent to existing development in White Star Ranch and is not in the scenic foreground as viewed from these roads, and the development will not significantly alter the scenic quality or rural character of these corridors. B. The visibility of the buildings is minimized by utilizing existing vegetation to provide screening, utilizing low building forms, staggering rooflines and breaking down the mass of the residence into smaller forms. C. The proposed residence and barns will not penetrate a ridgeline or silhouette against the sky as viewed from McLain Flats Road or Highway 82. D. The structures will be located at the edge of a meadow or pasture. 9. The Director further finds that the proposed ground mounted solar energy collection devices comply with Sec. 4- 30 -50(h) of the Code as follows: the devices are accessory to the residential use and shall be used primarily for on -site purposes; the devices will have a matte finish or be of a non - reflective color; will not exceed 12' in height; are located within the Activity Envelope; and will be screened from view from adjacent properties by existing vegetation along the ditch. THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DOES HEREBY APPROVE the MAM Aspen LLC Activity Envelope Amendment and Site Plan Review, subject to the following conditions, which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: 1. The conditions of BOCC Resolution No. 144 -2004 shall remain in full force and effect, except as amended herein. 2. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the application and shall consider those representations to be conditions of approval, unless amended by other conditions. The footprint of the buildings shall be substantially consistent with the site plan attached as Exhibit A, and the elevations shall be substantially consistent with the graphic representations attached as Exhibit B. 3. Parcel 7 is exempt from growth management up to 5,750 square feet of floor area and can develop an additional 1,750 square feet of floor area up to a maximum of 7,500 square feet of floor area through the use of one TDR (which TDR may be shared with Parcels 4, 5 or 8). At building permit application for the residence, the Applicant shall surrender an executed Irrevocable Certificate of TDRs to allow the additional floor area up to 7,500 square feet, and a copy of the deed evidencing conveyance of the Certificate to the Applicant (if applicable). Agricultural buildings are subject to the floor area 0000X; Administrative Decision No. -2012 Page 3 exemptions provided in Sec. 5- 20 -70(i) of the Code. The Applicant is proposing to build two bams of approximately 4,480 square feet, which are exempt from floor area. 4. Prior to submission of any further development permit applications for the property, the Applicant shall be required to submit for approval by the County Attorney and Community Developmenta Site Plan in accordance with Land Use Code Section 2- 30 -20(g) and Application Manual Section 2.1.12 The above referenced approvals shall be a condition precedent to finalization and recordation of them. 5. Concurrent with submission of a building permit application for the residence, the Applicant shall: A. Provide proof of an adequate water supply (in terms of quantity and availability) for domestic and fire protection purposes, and for iffigation purposes, if applicable. A well was installed on the parcel in 1981 pursuant to Colorado Division of Water Resources permit #118146; this is a domestic well permit that allows up to one acre of irrigation. Irrigation water will also be supplied from the Salvation and Paradise ditches. B. Submit an On -Site Wastewater Treatment System construction permit to Environmental Health. C. Submit a drainage and erosion control plan for review and approval by Planning/Zoning. As the total development disturbs one (1) acre or more, the Applicant shall apply for and obtain a State Stormwater Permit. All historic and natural drainage patterns shall be maintained. Stormwater shall be detained onsite and allow infiltration of runoff prior to discharge. D. Obtain a County access /driveway permit for improvements to the existing ranch road that crosses the LaCroix parcel and Parcel 4 of the Craig Ranch to access Parcel 7, and for the new driveway on Parcel 7, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Aspen Fire Protection District ( "AFPD ") and Planning/Zoning. The permit application shall address improvement or replacement of the existing bridge across Woody Creek to meet County load requirements. The width of the ranch road may be varied to less than 16' with adequate pullouts and the grade may exceed 12% in certain areas, if approved by AFPD and Planning/Zoning. The owners of the Paradise Ditch shall be notified of any improvements that affect the ditch. The ranch road that continues across Parcel 7 beyond the residence and up to the pond may be minimally improved — the surface may be improved (but not paved), but the width shall not be increased. Beyond the pond, the ranch road shall be unimproved. E. Obtain a County Right -of -Way Permit for improvements to the intersection of the driveway with Woody Creek Road. F. Obtain an Earthmoving, Clearing and Grubbing Permit for all earthwork, landscaping, utility burial, pond, tennis court and other land disturbance not associated with the construction of the residence and other buildings. G. Submit a construction management plan for review and approval by Planning/Zoning. H. Complete a fireplace /woodstove registration form with the Community Development Department, if necessary. I. Submit a detailed revegetation plan for disturbed areas with appropriate seed mixes. The plan shall specify the native seed mix to be used, the rate at which it will be applied and the method of cover. J. Submit a tree mitigation plan for the removal of any trees larger than 6 inch DBH. K. Submit a detailed landscaping plan, which shall be generally consistent with the landscaping shown on the Site Plan 000020 Administrative Decision No. -2012 Page 4 L. Submit a detailed exterior lighting plan demonstrating compliance with the County's lighting regulations. Exterior lighting on the west and south facades of the residence shall be limited to the minimum required to comply with the building code. Lighting of the tennis court is prohibited. M. Obtain a permit for the ground mounted solar energy collectors. The collectors and other ancillary development shall have a matte finish or be of a non - reflective material/color and shall not exceed 12' in height. 6. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the residence, the Applicant shall pay the applicable road and employee housing impact fees. Prior to issuance of building permits for the two agricultural buildings, the Applicant shall submit a covenant to the Community Development Department for approval and recordation. The covenart shall specify that the exempt floor area for the agricultural buildings may only be used in association with the raising, producing or keeping of plants or livestock, or cultivation and management of other crops or farm products, and that any area not consistent with those uses would count as floor area. The covenant shall allow the County to inspect the agricultural buildings at any time for compliance with the specified use limitations, subject to the provision of reasonable notice to the property owner. S. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the main residence, the Applicant shall submit for recording a covenant acceptable to the Community Development Department and County Attorney prohibiting commercial agricultural activities on the parcel. 9. The exterior of the residence and barns shall be built or painted with indigenous earth tone materials or colors. All roofs shall have a non - reflective color or composition, with the exception of materials associated with solar or photovoltaic equipment. 10. The Applicant shall comply with all of the codes and requirements of the Aspen Fire Protection District, including but not limited to access, turning around of fire apparatus, installation of approved fire sprinkler systems in all structures, and a minimum 20,000 gallon water supply for fire- fighting. 11. No development shall occur outside of the approved Activity Envelopes, with the exception of vegetation removal necessary to comply with the wildfire mitigation measures described in Resolution No. 144 -2004. 12. All new utilities shall be installed in locations and through procedures that minimize visual impacts to the maximum extent practicable. All utilities shall be installed or extended underground within the approved Activity Envelopes or along the driveway. 13. The Applicant shall provide adequate engineering of any retaining walls over 4' in height and/or any improvements to retaining walls over 4' in height. All retaining walls shall be a maximum of 7' in height. 14. No development in excess of 30" above or below natural grade shall occur within the setbacks of the parcel, with the exception of driveways and associated retaining walls of up to 6' above or below natural grade and fencing. Landscaping in the form of berms shall not exceed four feet from the most restrictive grade. Any development located within setbacks mandated by County zoning regulations that does not comply with these restrictions shall require a variance from the Board of 000021 Administrative Decision No. _ -2012 Page 5 Adjustment. Approval of an activity envelope within such setbacks does not assure approval of a variance. 15. No calculations for height, bulk, setback, size, floor area, or any other building and zoning requirements have been conducted. These requirements will be considered at the time of building permit. Any structures represented in the application might not be permitted under building and zoning regulations. 16. Failure to comply with these conditions of approval may result in revocation of this permit or any subsequent permits related to this property or vested rights associated with this property. 17. Statutory vested rights for the approval contained herein are granted pursuant to the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Colorado Statutes, subject to the exceptions set forth in Pitkin County Land Use Code, § 4 -140 and C.R.S., § 24 -68 -105. The statutory vested rights granted herein shall expire on 12015. NOTICE PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES WEEKLY on the 11`s day of October, 2012. APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR this _ day of 2012. PUBLISHED AFTER ADOPTION FOR VESTED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS in the Aspen Times Weekly on the _ day of 2012. Cindy Houben, Community Development Director P091 -12 PID9264315400009 000022 EXHIBIT # 6 Suzanne Farver on.} Nknd,,nlark I..t11v 11'cxnl\0 -c k.C;() sje;7,6 February 22, 2013 Ms. Suzanne Wolff Pitkin County Planning Department Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Suzanne, I have reviewed the revised site plan for MAM Ranch and do not have any problems with the proposed changes they are submitting to the county. I understand that the building envelope is moving slightly to the north and that the location of the pond has changed. I am supportive of both changes. I am also fine with the tennis court and the absorption field. The Metzes have been sensitive to the needs of the neighbors during their planning and I am confident that their plan will be tasteful and in keeping with the surroundings. Thank you for soliciting my feed back on the change Hope you are well Best.regards, , Suzanne Farver 970 -sr0 -182: FAX t'70 -`+'_U -12{24 cma L lunrrt %,snpna.nct 000023 000024 1 2 3 4 1 5 1 a 1 7 1 a I 1 10 1 U 112 13 14 its 116 117 118 19 1 N 0 -HAUDT HGERRSC MAM ASPEN LLC landscape architects ACTIVITY ENVELOPE/ 850 West Jadmn Blvd A\ SITE PLAN Q SUIte 000 Chicago, 1111flols 60607 V DESCRIPTION Tel; 312.492.6501 LEGAL F =:312.492.7101 PARCEL 7, FIRST AMENDED PLAT OF CRAIG RANCH PARCELS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF CENTERLINE 3D- WIDE PRIVATE RECORDED JUNE 20, 2006 IN PLAT BOOK 79 AT PAGE 81 PARCEL ID NO. 264315400009 1 PITKIN COUNTY, \ wUNDERGROUNIO COLORADO Pmear ASEMENTAGRILEMENT ZOED MARCH 9. MAM ASPEN LLC 30 WIDE RED ,P"TrAorus DR OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OUTILITYEASE4ErNT OFOF TO THE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES BEING INFORMED BY C COMOLIANt PITKIN COUNTY OF THE EXISTENCE OF 4 FENCB, TYP. 0"ABJE af RECEPTIQ N 'ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD AREAS'THA7 MIGHT AFFECT cueKT FUTURE BARN THE PROPERTY, ANY IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE USE THEREOF. THE PROVISIONS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY MAM Aspen LLC Craig Ranch Parcel 7 REGULATIONS DO NOT IN ANY WAY ASSURE OR IMPLY AREAS OUTSIDE OF DESIGNATED HAZARD PIddn ODunty, CDI=do THAT THE AREAS WILL BE FREE FROM HAZARDS OR THAT I M171GATION MEASURES WILL GUARANTEE APPROVED t / ; THE SAFM OF THE PROPERTY. m COMLTM11,15 EXISTING BUILDING j ENVELOPE (200r,20) MANAGER MAM ASPEN LLC itmis COURT PLIANT FENCE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL L THIS MAM ASPEN LLC ACTIVITY ENVELOPE /SITE PLAIN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF PITKIN REALIGNED DITCH LINE COUNTY THIS — DAY OF _ 20I3 AND 13 PROPOSED SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION NO M _4013, RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO_ CINDY HOUBEN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E,AC DIRECTOR UTlUnELOM *Akv* ft,, WE M-1 TING WEL CLERK AND RECORDER'S EXPIRES 0113112014 rl CERTIFICATE w THIS MAM ASPEN LLC ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE m P"N PLAN HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN 4 COUNTY, COLORADO THIS _ DAY OF 2013 IN PUT BOOK 1kjy – !zs AT PAGE N AS RECEPTION NO. CLERK AND RECORDER GENERAL NOTES X-1 1. TREE MITIGATI ON TO BE PROVIDED AT BUILDING R PERMIT ACTIVITY N 2. FASTING CONTOURS AT 5' INTERVAL; SEE L002 FOR F ENVELOPE /SITE PLAN DIAGRAMMATIC GRADING PLAN SRC L 7 LEGEND PRELIMINARY: �4 NOT FOR t –4, EXISTING VEGETATION -TO BE PROTECTED Iv, 30% SLOPE OR GREATER fi CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED NATIVE SEEDING —d P -1 y One t D C j SIZE PLAN/ BUILDING ENVELOPE T 0 im��1111111 Iuoo' A L001 000024 1 f 3 1 2 1 3 4 1 6 1 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 113 11 16 16 C 16100 7 of I i i I�,rh A// l fkyJrr,= N (IJ / I DGI •� SYING RPNCH _ _ / —\ •y�� 0OAD EASEMENT PARADISE DITCH -- _ — _ _ — // ACCESS, UTOJTV ENVELOPE - _ 10 -(1- REALIGNED y TA DITCH A \ \ \ \ _ t PRI ING \ LR€(200 a2 ) 20p0LFIRE WIO) ANO HVDRANT SV STEM _ ABANDON DITCH PIPE — — — II MINOR-- \ ♦7,._\ - \ ._ — — __ — _ - .. -.. ,. \ \,'. SDOREANQMALY �•. `' ..' _ i- � _ _ _ / J 1 1 rnl�i/l.,jci (riif/ _ EQbF f uROT CRAW RANCH --- I b lll• �� I(t .1 t. h r� _ EE. TT — E �� — r r x MINOR v .. drEtN ALY re Om \ I e - -- - I t � / OTR aR Mae vale set JL2L COOE COMPLIANT LAN .a. �T \`.\l� „`V OPENFENCE TYP: rc - QPE - / PROPOSED REE. Iln � �i�l�e \ Pro art ODEDOMPLIANT / ABSORPTE�i iC T �N \ EXISTING WELL pp LL�t -� �N 5 OPEN FENCE TYP. - ^` \ j` y.l %5 / / - \ 4 \ c LEGEND GENERAL NOTES 0 EXISTING VEGETATION- 1, VCONTOUR INTERVAL; FINAL LANDSCAPE AND GRADING DESIGN 0 1 0' TO BE PROTECTED TO BE PROVIDED AT BUILDING PERMIT. THIS PLAN PROVIDES _ 30% SLOPE OR GREATER DIAGRAMMATIC LANDSCAPE AND GRADING DESIGN. 0 2. TREE MITIGATION TO Be PROVIDED AT BUILDING PERMIT PROPOSED NATIVE SEEDING _ A HOfRR SC+AUDT landscape architects 850 West ckwn Skid Sub 800 Chlrago, Illinois 60607 Tel: 312.492.6501 Fn: 312.492.7101 FMM NAM ASPEN LLC euaNr NAM Aspen LLC Craig Ranch Parcel 7 Plain (bullty, Colorado WNWLTAHI6 WA1 Q�S�1� �r //�\ ��oFCa� GrpaoAR EXPUtES 01/31/2014 ACTIVITY ENVELOPE /SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I41121flr 817E PLAN ENLARGEMENT L002 OwMNmm x..sa.s PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920 -5526 FAX# (970) 920 -5439 May 6, 2013 Alan Richman PO Box 3613 Aspen, CO 81612 arichman@sopris.net Re: MAM Aspen LLC Minor Amendment to a Development Permit and Minor Plat Amendment (CASE P042 -13; PID 2643 - 154 -00 -009) Dear Mr. Richman: The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. After a more detailed review of the submittal information, additional information specific to the application may be requested in order to adequately review and process the application. The planner in charge of the review will request the information from you directly. If you have any questions, please call Suzanne Wolff, the planner assigned to your case, at 920 -5093. Sincerely, Bonnie Waechtler Administrative Assistant PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920 -5526 FAX4 (970) 920 -5439 MEMORANDUM To: Woody Creek Caucus FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Community Development Department Suzanne.wolffij�co.j)itkin.co.us Re: MAM Aspen LLC Minor Amendment to a Development Permit and Minor Plat Amendment (PID 2643 - 154 -00 -009; Case P042 -13) DATE: May 6, 2013 Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application submitted by MAM Aspen LLC. The Pitkin County Community Development Director will review the application. Please return your comments to me by Friday, May 24, 2013. httD: / /www.aSDenDitkin.com/ Portal s /0 /does /county /Com %20Dev /Plannina /Land Use Ao plications /P042 13 aDD.Ddf Thank you. Suzanne Wolff From: Bonnie Shiles Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:15 PM To: Suzanne Wolff Subject: FW: 5/24/13 Due Pitkin County Land Use MAM Aspen LLC application From: janet k schoeberlein [mailto:ianetkayes(algmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 1 :12 PM To: Bonnie Shiles Subject: Re: 5/24/13 Due Pitkin County Land Use MAM Aspen LLC application TO: Suzanne Wolff, Community Development Department Suzanne.wolffi co.pitkin.co.us Re: MAM Aspen LLC Minor Amendment to a Development Permit and Minor Plat Amendment (PID 2643 - 154 -00 -009; Case P042 -13) DATE: May 23, 2013 The Woody Creek Caucus District Planning Commission has no objections to the subject application, considering the remote location of the property and the fact that the nearest neighbor has no objections. Janet K. Schoeberlein for the District Planning Commission On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Bonnie Shiles <Bonnie.Waechtler a, co.pitkin.co.us> wrote: PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920 -5526 FAX# (970) 920 -5439 / v / 1 PITKIN ®LINTY COMMUNITY DEVELAMENT Permit Receipt RECEIPT NUMBER 00033948 Name: MAM Aspen LLC Project Address: - 0 WOODY CREEK RD Type: check # 1038 Permit Number Fee Description 0042.2013. PLAN 0042.2013. PLAN PP- Flat Fee PP- Clerk Tech Fee .r it Date:4125/2013 Amount 1,248.00 25.00 Total: 1,273.00 w . 80 iii pll� ►" I 7 VA , RAW-NCO, = =0° � � t-,�� 3 ?� ���` ��_�� � On 80 %1' I r, / r—� 9/ 1 /r y —.CGDE CGMPLIANT- OPEN FMCE Irw" ProPepY Iln EXISTING VEGETATION - TO BE PROTECTED _ 3(44 SLOPE OR GREATER 0 PROPOSED NATIVE SEEDING 1 _._ 1 a 2 .._ -- _L 11 ill rz - / 3 "-DPBI FENCE TW GENERAL NOTES 1. V CONTOUR INTERVAL: FINAL LANOSCAPE MO GRADING DESIGN TO BE PROVIDED AT BUILDING PERMIT. TNIS PLAN PROVIDES DIAGRAMMATIC LANDSCAPE MD GRADING DESIGN. 2. TREE MITIGATION TO BE PROVIDED AT BUILDING PERMIT 15 �1. 17 ,t19_ L9., 10 AWvAAr I f OIVEft WOODY PION I — — — — 7 (iL 4 i H _ — - -" L r7 77 %orrc \ \ - -- — _ A \ IIAI6 RA61� _ — \_� \ _` PAMEL-7 _ —_ —_ \ 9°79 Y \r \� \T I•\ HOE RR SC-HAUDT landscape architects 860 West 3adospi BIW s"Re m Chicago, 1111hois 60607 Tel: 312.992.6501 Fax; 312.992.7101 R10RsCr MAM ASPEN LLC ¢Rm NAM Aspen LLC Craig Ranch Parcel 7 P&n County, Calaado ML ACTIVITY ENVELOPE /SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION .m lVTE PLAN ENLARG01PJlT 2 e &1 L002 ne..asaoux�,w.s �m ao n° g a - Pro@ert Ilse \ D NO �£iVV�f✓ (20p'x3 —_ 70.000'GAL FIRE — / ANO_HVDRAM SV37IIA T —_-1`_ - ` � � µy —AUInY rz - / 3 "-DPBI FENCE TW GENERAL NOTES 1. V CONTOUR INTERVAL: FINAL LANOSCAPE MO GRADING DESIGN TO BE PROVIDED AT BUILDING PERMIT. TNIS PLAN PROVIDES DIAGRAMMATIC LANDSCAPE MD GRADING DESIGN. 2. TREE MITIGATION TO BE PROVIDED AT BUILDING PERMIT 15 �1. 17 ,t19_ L9., 10 AWvAAr I f OIVEft WOODY PION I — — — — 7 (iL 4 i H _ — - -" L r7 77 %orrc \ \ - -- — _ A \ IIAI6 RA61� _ — \_� \ _` PAMEL-7 _ —_ —_ \ 9°79 Y \r \� \T I•\ HOE RR SC-HAUDT landscape architects 860 West 3adospi BIW s"Re m Chicago, 1111hois 60607 Tel: 312.992.6501 Fax; 312.992.7101 R10RsCr MAM ASPEN LLC ¢Rm NAM Aspen LLC Craig Ranch Parcel 7 P&n County, Calaado ML ACTIVITY ENVELOPE /SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION .m lVTE PLAN ENLARG01PJlT 2 e &1 L002 ne..asaoux�,w.s �m ao n° g a RECEPTION #: 600109, 06/05/2013 at 12:56:56 PM, 1 OF 2, R $21.00 Janice K. V/os Caudill, Pitkin County, CO PLAT 13K 103 PG 19 KEY PLAN SKEET SITE PLAN/ BUILDING ENVELOPE i d&2- 11 © copyright 2013 Hoerr Schaudt 1 2 LEGEND GENERAL NOTES 1. 1' CONTOUR INTERVAL; FINAL LANDSCAPE AND GRADING DESIGN TO BE PROVIDED AT BUILDING PERMIT. THIS PLAN PROVIDES DIAGRAMMATIC LANDSCAPE AND GRADING DESIGN. 2. TREE MITIGATION TO BE PROVIDED AT BUILDING PERMIT /yam 7m) —1/16 X, -- - - - - B 110 ,, 7 5 0' 250' 0 Mir N!W Wo ,,andscape architects PROJECT MAM ASPEN LLA CLIENT MAM Aspen LLC Craig Ranch Parcel 7 Pj:fl: R1qW-W-R1 ACTIVITY ENVELOPE/SITE PLAN PRELDIMIART: NOT FOR 1 04/25/13 SITE PLAN/BLDG ENVELOPE NO DATE ISSUE SHEET SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT g copyright 2013 Hoerr Schaudt EXISTING VEGETATION - • BE PROTECTED 30% SLOPE OR GREATER PROPOSED NATIVE SEEDING GENERAL NOTES 1. 1' CONTOUR INTERVAL; FINAL LANDSCAPE AND GRADING DESIGN TO BE PROVIDED AT BUILDING PERMIT. THIS PLAN PROVIDES DIAGRAMMATIC LANDSCAPE AND GRADING DESIGN. 2. TREE MITIGATION TO BE PROVIDED AT BUILDING PERMIT /yam 7m) —1/16 X, -- - - - - B 110 ,, 7 5 0' 250' 0 Mir N!W Wo ,,andscape architects PROJECT MAM ASPEN LLA CLIENT MAM Aspen LLC Craig Ranch Parcel 7 Pj:fl: R1qW-W-R1 ACTIVITY ENVELOPE/SITE PLAN PRELDIMIART: NOT FOR 1 04/25/13 SITE PLAN/BLDG ENVELOPE NO DATE ISSUE SHEET SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT g copyright 2013 Hoerr Schaudt