HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.273504300008 (6)DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the BOCC an&or P &Z
Ordinance for the BOCC and /or P &Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat copies (I IXI7)
offal
2735 -043 -00 -008 9/26/1997 *COPIES 12 P115 -97
CASE NA Sunshine Ranch 1041 Hazard Review & Conceptual Submission Planers Suzanne Wolff
PROJ ADD 2298 Owl Creek Rd Owl Creek S -T -R 4 -10 -85
OWN /APP: Robbins,Anihony '•.RI C /S /Z:l PHN:�
REP: Morley, Kevinc/o Robert Tro ; ADR: P.O_ Box 6620 C /S/Z: [Snowma -s Village, CC PHN: 923-2644
Email Addr., ALLOCATED
FEES Dtff50 *155 - 155 +11 FEESAGtZ.D -, +155 +155 +110 = %OVER:
REFERRAq CountyABOrney, County Engineer, Zoning, Env. Health, State Forest Service, Division of Wildlife, CounNWildlif
1 128/1997 BY SH
i-
DUETU/12/1997
M T G DATE+ ' O� DY TICED DATE OF
FINAL ACTION: 2112/1998
_
F/8/1998 hearing off No
BOCCReso:
2/12/1998 j1hearing of J No I
No
- BOCC Ord: r
. REMARK
HO Determination not given a number
PZ:
HRG OFF:' #414585
CLOSED: 2/20/1998 BY; {SH ...
HO INDEX:
Tip
ADMIN:-
PLAT RECORD 1/5/99 PLAT (BKPG): 648 P34 #426273
ADMIN INDEX: J�-
VR APPROVAL OA - VR EXPIRES '�
CASE TYP; .f1041 Hazard Review and General Su CASETYP5: F
CASE CASETYP6�
CASE l'YP3: CASE TYPT
`
CASE TYPO Date Scanned:
9126/13
file Location: FF Box #229
DETERMINATION OF THE HEARING OFFICER OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, REGARDING THE SUNSHINE RANCH
1041 HAZARD REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL SUBMISSION
RECITALS
1. Sunshine Ranch, LLC (hereafter "Applicant ") has applied to the Pitkin County Hearing Officer
(hereafter "Hearing Officer ") for 1041 Hazard Review approval to establish a building envelope to
construct a new single- family residence.
2. The property is located at 2298 Owl Creek Road, and is more specifically described in Exhibit A.
3. The property is zoned AFR -10 and contains approximately 4 acres.
4. The Hearing Officer heard this application at public hearings on January 8 and February 12, 1998,
at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to this application.
5. The Hearing Officer finds that the proposed building envelope avoids the wetland and riparian
areas and the floodplain of Owl Creek, and is located on slopes of less than 15 %; the wildfire hazard is rated
as low, and can be mitigated; and the existing residence, though constructed in the 1910 -20s, is not listed on
the County's Historic Inventory.
6. The Hearing Officer further finds that access from Mandalay Road on a bridge across Owl Creek is
not acceptable, based on the existence of an alternate access directly off of Owl Creek Road which avoids
the creek, wetland and floodplain by its location away from these areas.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Hearing Officer that approval is
hereby granted to the Sunshine Ranch 1041 Hazard Review and Conceptual Submission, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The applicant shall submit an amended 1041 Site Plan to the Community Development Department
for approval and recording, prior to submission of any building permit applications. The site plan
shall also be submitted in digital format for integration into the County's GIS system. The site plan
shall be modified as follows:
.
A Amend the signature block for the Hearing Officer.
'
�
OOLJ01 C
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IN
414588 03/17/1998 02:33P RDMIN DE DAVIS SILVI
1 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
B. Include the following 1041 hazard waiver on the site plan: "1041 environmental hazard
areas exist that might affect the property, any improvements, and the use and occupancy
thereof."
C. Include the following note on the site plan: "All structures shall be generally located as
shown on this site plan. Structures in other locations shall require further review by the
Hearing Officer."
2. Prior to issuance of a septic permit, the applicants shall provide documentation to the
Environmental Health Department as to the quantity and quality of the water from the spring.
3. A septic permit shall be obtained from and approved by the Environmental Health Department,
prior to issuance of a building permit. The septic system shall be located within the building
envelope or the designated septic envelope. The system must comply with all minimum horizontal
setback requirements between its components and physical features. The system must be designed
by a qualified professional engineer. Soil tests must be performed to the satisfaction of and to meet
the requirements of the Environmental Health Department.
4. A fireplace /woodstove permit shall be approved by the Environmental Health Department prior to
issuance of a building permit.
5. The applicant shall comply with the following landscaping and wildfire defensible space mitigation
standards:
A. Brush, debris, and non - ornamental vegetation shall be removed within a minimum 10 foot
perimeter around the structure.
B. Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the vertical and horizontal continuity of the fuels a
minimum of a 30 foot perimeter around the structure.
C. Spacing between clumps of brush and vegetation within the 30 foot perimeters shall be a
minimum of two times the height of the fuel. Maximum diameter of the clumps shall not
exceed 10 feet. All measurements shall be from the edges of the crowns of the fuel.
D. All branches from trees and brush within the 30 foot perimeter shall be pruned to a height
of 10 feet above the ground and ladder fuels from around trees and brush shall be removed.
E. Tree crown separation within the 30 foot perimeters shall have a minimum of 10 feet
between the edges of the crowns.
F. All branches which extend over the roof eaves shall be trimmed and all branches within 15
feet of the chimneys shall be removed.
G. The density of fuels within a 100 foot perimeter of the structure shall be reduced.
H. All deadfall within the 100 foot perimeter shall be removed.
I. Low vegetation shall be maintained within a 10 foot perimeter around all structures.
J. The applicant shall be responsible for the continued maintenance of the defensible space
vegetation requirements.
6. The applicant shall comply with the following additional wildfire mitigation standards:
A. Roof construction shall be Class A, non - combustible material with no flat roofs.
B. Vents shall be screened with corrosive resistant wire mesh with mesh '/4 inch maximum.
C. Roofs and gutters shall be kept clear of debris.
D. Yards shall be kept clear of all litter, slash, and flammable debris.
G &uJ02
111111111111111111111111 IIIII lift ifil ill 11111111111 11 1 IN
414588 03/17/1998 02:33P RDNIN DE DAVIS SILVI
2 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
1111111IIIII HIM IIIIII11111II 111iiiIIIII1111IIII
414885 03/17/1998 02:33P ADMIN DE DAVIS SILVI
3 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
E. All flammable materials shall be stored on a parallel contour a minimum of 15 feet away
from any structure.
F. Weeds and grasses within the 10 foot perimeter shall be maintained to a height not more
than 6 inches.
G. Firewood /wood piles shall be stacked on a parallel contour a minimum of 15 feet away
from the structure.
H. Swimming pools shall be accessible to Fire Department vehicles.
I. Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris.
J. Wood fences shall not connect to the structure.
K. Any outbuildings or additional structures shall adhere to the same standards as structures.
L. Fuel tanks shall be installed underground with an approved container.
M. Propane tanks shall be installed according to NFPA 48 standards and on a contour away
from the structure with standard defensible space vegetation mitigation around any above-
ground tank. Any wood enclosure around the tank shall be constructed with materials
approved for 2 hour fire- resistive construction on the exterior side of the walls.
N. Each structure shall have a minimum of one 10 pound approved ABC fire extinguisher
placed in a visible and accessible location.
O. Addresses shall be clearly marked with 2 inch non - combustible letters and shall be visible
and installed on a non - combustible post.
P. Utility lines shall be buried.
The applicant shall comply with the following measures to mitigate impacts to wildlife:
A. Only one dog is allowed, and the dog shall be kenneled.
B. Fencing shall not exceed 42 inches in height with a maximum of 3 strands of wire or 3
rails. Horse feed shall be enclosed within a minimum 8 foot high, wildlife -proof fence,
which shall be located within the building envelope. Existing fencing on the property shall
be brought into compliance.
C. All trash/garbage shall be kept in approved bear proof garbage containers.
8. No development, including grading, landscaping, vegetation removal or disturbance, shall occur
outside of the approved building envelope, except for utility and driveway extension and
maintenance, and as may be necessary to implement the wildfire mitigation measures required
elsewhere in this document.
9. Access shall remain on Owl Creek Road, and if the driveway is to be relocated, it shall only be
moved to the west of the existing location. The applicant shall obtain and the County Engineer
shall approve an access permit prior to issuance of any building permits, if the access is to be
relocated. If the driveway is not relocated, it shall be narrowed to no more than 16 feet in width to
comply with applicable County standards. Any future requests for access other than that described
herein shall require further review.
10. For any free market residential structure of 5,000 gross square feet or greater, the applicant is
required to provide the following traffic studies:
A. Prior to application for building permit the applicant shall provide for review and approval
of the County Engineer a construction trip generation study.
0G11r'3
1 u1111111111111111u111 i11111111o11 111 1111111111111
414585 03/17/1998 02 :33P ADM DE DAVIS SILVI
4 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
B. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide a trip generation
study for the residence, which shall be developed by a traffic engineering consultant hired
by the applicant and pre- approved by the County Engineer.
11. Construction parking and material storage are prohibited on Owl Creek Road.
12. The applicant shall either obtain approval to deed restrict the existing residence as a caretaker or
employee dwelling unit, or shall relocate or demolish the residence, prior to issuance of a certificate
of occupancy for the new residence. Pursuant to Section 3- 200.60 of the Land Use Code,
Demolition Extensions, prior to issuance of any building permits for the new residence, the
applicant shall execute a guarantee in a form acceptable to the County Attorney insuring the
demolition of the existing structure prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new
residence, if approval has not been granted to retain the residence as a caretaker or employee
dwelling unit.
13. All material representations made by the applicants in.the application or in public meetings shall be
adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless amended by other conditions.
APPROVED ON THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1998.
ATTEST:
Sharon Hirman
Administrative Assistant
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
John Ely,
County Afforney
PI 15 -97
2735- 043 -00 -008
\suzannew \pitkin \cases \1041\hearofftrobbins2.doc
J'.� U'lJ 0 4
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT HEARING OFFICER
OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
By r2adkt
Lance Clarke, Hearing Officer
Date 2,
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
eptWdd-4- a_- fir• q'P
Cindy Houben,
Community Development Director
1/1 Wk T l'
TO: Lance Clarke, Pitkin County Hearing Officer
FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Planning Office
RE: Sunshine Ranch 1041 Hazard Review and Conceptual Submission - Continued Public
Hearing
DATE: February 12, 1998
REQUEST: The applicant requests 1041 Hazard Review and Conceptual Submission approval for
construction of a single family residence.
The Hearing Officer continued the public hearing on January 8, 1998, to allow staff to research further the
issue of historically irrigated pastures and to allow the applicant to provide additional information on the
proposed building envelope and access. The applicant has prepared a revised site plan, which is included
with this memo. The previous staff memo is attached for reference; only specific outstanding issues are
addressed below.
APPLICANT: Sunshine Ranch, LLC
REPRESENTATIVE: Robert Sinclair, Robert Trown & Associates
LOCATION: 2298 Owl Creek Road; southwest corner of the intersection of Owl Creek Road and
Mandalay Road.
ZONING/LOT SIZE: The property is zoned AFR -10 and contains approximately 4 acres.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains an existing 2,600 square foot two -story wood frame house
and a 1,300 square foot single -story slab on grade garage. The majority of the property is used for hay
production.
ISSUES:
ildfir : As discussed at the January 8 hearing, Vince Urbina of the Colorado State Forest Service rated
the wildfire hazard on the property as low, and recommended standard defensible space mitigation. The
parcel is essentially flat and has been irrigated and used for hay production, therefore, wildfire hazard is
minimal. Staff has included the current wildfire standards of Section 3- 80.70(C) as conditions of approval.
Historically Irrigated Pasture: The standards in Section 3 -70 of the Code, Water Resources, are applicable
to all development. Section 3- 70.60(C), Irrigated Areas, states that land uses shall "insure the preservation
of at least 95% of the acreage historically available for human food production, or hay, grain and other feed
crops for livestock." At the previous meeting the applicant's attorney, Mickey Herron, asserted that this
provision was onerous and ambiguous, and destroys the value of the property. Mr. Herron questioned
whether the provision has been uniformly imposed and noted that the provision does not obligate the owner
1i 4�Ui05
to continue to grow hay on the property. The County Attorney, John Ely, has made a determination that 2
acres (the area currently available for hay production) is not a viable area for food production or a hay
operation, and, therefore, that the lot can be considered not to be available for food production and not to be
subject to the provisions of Section 3- 70.60(C), Irrigated Areas.
Access: The applicant has indicated an access to the property from Mandalay Road on the revised site plan
which would span Owl Creek and the wetland and floodplain areas. The applicant has asked for a
determination as to whether this access is a possibility before providing more detailed engineering studies.
Bud Eylar, County Engineer, commented previously that access should not be allowed from Mandalay
Road, since that would result in wetland, riparian and floodplain impacts. After reviewing the revised site
plan, Mr. Eylar states, "The optional drive location is not acceptable as there is an acceptable and usable
location in existence and the improvements to the existing drive have no 1041 impacts. A bridge across
Owl Creek will impact wetland and riparian areas. Since avoidance is the preferred method of dealing with
1041 issues, the bridge would not be acceptable." Mike Villa, Wildlife Biologist, notes that a permit from
the Army Corps of Engineers would not be required, as long as any and all impact is avoided by spanning
the wetland entirely. However, avoidance by spanning the wetland would only be acceptable if there was
no other feasible location. In this case the access can be located directly off of Owl Creek Road, thereby
truly avoiding the wetland area.
RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to Section 3- 80.10(B)(2) of the Land Use Code, the Hearing Officer is
authorized to approve a site plan and application for development of one single - family dwelling unit and
customary accessory uses located within certain 1041 hazard areas. Staff recommends approval of the
Sunshine Ranch 1041 Hazard Review and Conceptual Submission, subject to the conditions of approval in
the attached Hearing Officer Determination.
Attachments
1. Colorado State Forest Service comments
2. County Engineer's comments
3. Wildlife Biologist's comments
4. January 8, 1998 staff memo and attachments
Application Amendment and Revised Site Plan provided separately
00GJ06
01/07;1998 11:34 9708533665 GITY OF FRUITA PAGE 01
State Senic Building
222 S. 6th Street. Room 416
January 7, 1998 Gmnd Junction, Culosdo91501
Telephone, (470) 24N -7325
Suzanne Wolff
Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department
130 South Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Robbins 1041 Wildfire Hazard Review
Suzanne,
I read the application and inspected the site with Rob Sinclair the owner's
representative on January 6th. Access to the site is from Owl Creek Road. The
current driveway to the existing house originates at a right angle from Owl Creek
Road. It would be wise to maintain that right angle access. The building envelope has
a north access with a slope of 5 -10 %. The existing vegetation is pasture grass and
would be rated as a low wildfire hazard.
My only recommendations to mitigate any future wildfire hazard would be to establish
a defensible space around all structures by incorporating the following.
1) Establish a 10 foot perimeter around all structures where the vegetation can be
maintained at 6 inches or less (i.e.. mowed grass). Any future woody landscaping
should be kept outside this perimeter. In addition, flammable material (i.e.. firewood)
should be stored outside this 10 foot perimeter.
2) Future woody landscaping should allow for 10 foot spacing between the edge of
tree crowns at maturity within a 30 foot perimeter around all structures. Given a
choice of native plant material for landscaping I would recommend cottonwoods or
aspen over spruces, pines and scrub (i.e., Gambel) oak. Cottonwoods and aspen do
not contain the resins and low branching habits that our native conifers and oak have.
Feel free to Cali me with any questions. Thank you for the opportunity to review this
application.
Sincerely,
f\
A. Vince Urbina
Assistant District Forester
cc: Ed VanWalraven - Aspen FD
Rob Sinclair
0 J�J07
MEMORANDUM
To: Suzanne Wolff
From: Bud Eylar
Date: 2/6/98
Re: Sunshine Ranch revised site plan
Suzanne, I have reviewed the new site plan and have the following comments:
• The revisions to and the lengthening of the existing drive will require the applicant to
acquire an Access Permit from the County Engineering Dept.
• The optional drive location is not acceptable as there is an acceptable and usable
location in existence and the improvements to the existing drive have no 1041
impacts. A bridge across Owl Creek will impact wetlands and riparian areas. Since
avoidance is the preferred method of dealing with 1041 issues, the bridge would not
be acceptable.
UUUJ ®3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Suzanne Wolff— Community Development
FROM: Michael Villa -- Wildlife Biologist
RE: Robbins Wetland Impacts
DATE: February 5,1998
Suzanne,
From the memo and new drawing that the applicant has submitted it appears that he is
going to avoid impacts. Through the 404 process, avoidance is the first measure an
applicant takes when dealing with potential impacts. Since they are avoiding any and
all impacts by spanning the wetland entirely there is no need for a permit from the
Army Corps of Engineers.
UOLA3
Januan,22.1998
Mr. Lance Clarke
Ms. Suzanne Wolff
Hearing Officer
Pitkin County
Community Development Department
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Re. Sunshine Ranch
2298 Owl Creek Road
Dear Mr Clarke and Ms Wolff.
1't
013Wd013A30 Ajo inriWOJ
9661 Z7.mi
t73A13338
Per our discussion of yesterday, and in compliance with the requirements of the 1041 Public Hearing on January 8,
1998, please accept this resubmittal of the Sunshine Ranch 1041 Site Plan I have attempted to illustrate all of the
issues we discussed and will outline our responses in tlus letter as well
Regarding the primary issue of establishing a building envelope, as we discussed we are not volunteering to limit
our building envelope per se However, we are pleased to indicate the locations of all proposed structures, site
amenities, and required services such as the septic field.
The site is zoned for and we are intending to build up to 15, 000 square feet As you can see, the size of the septic
field for a home of this size and the required 100 -foot setback, necessitate moving the house well back into the site.
We are not in favor of thus scenano However, locating the septic system to the south of the property is not
compatible with the required setback from our water source, Owl creek or the possibility of utilizing this open space
for recreation or wildlife
We are reevaluating the location of the driveway off Mandalay Road. As discussed, we would be happy to provide
engineering for the required access and bridging of Owl Creek. We are proposing to span over sensitive areas as
required, and use rmnmmm impact foundations as needed elsewhere. As we only met yesterday morning, I have not
had sufficient response time for my engineers to make their recommendations However, we would like to get an
indication of whether the proposed location provides a possibility, rather than investing too much time and expense
into a proposal which would never be approved.
I have enclosed eight copies of the revised 1041 Site Plan as requested. Please don't hesitate to contact me with
questions or comments.
Best regards,
Robert Sincla
Project G Architir
ect
encl
25 Lower Woodbridge Rd. • Suite 104 -B • P.O. Box 6820 • Snowmass Village, CO 81615 • (303) 923 -2644 • FAX (303) 923 -2599
P.O. Box 8952 • Newport Beach, CA 92658 • Telephone /Fax (714) 856 -1644
e Quinn, e: s ap a on r na ea
X- Sender: debbieq @commons.co.pitkin.co.us
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 11:34:32 -0700
To: lancec @co.pitkin.co.us
From: Debbie Quinn <debbieq @ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Re: stapleton /tony robbins hearing officer 1041 review
Cc: johne @co.pitkin.co.us
Lance,
I'm forwarding John's comments in light of our discussion this morning. On
the West Ranch parcel, since the school parcel is being subdivided off a
bigger parcel, the section shuld be addressed, as we discussed, in the
context of the larger Aspen Downs /Aspen Valley Ranch parcels. Once you look
at the prior approvals on those, and know the details of them and how they
may relate to this application, let's talk again.
Debbie
>X- Sender: johne @commons.co.pitkin.co.us
>Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 14:.52:43 -0700
>To: Debbie Quinn <debbieq @ci.aspen.co.us>
>From: John Ely <johne @ci.aspen.co.us>
> Subject: Re: stapleton /tony robbins hearing officer 1041 review
>I got a call a while back from Mickey Herron on this and talked to Lance
to
>pass on my impressions and let him pursue it further. My feeling is that
>this particular section of the code was intended to be applied in larger
>scale ag property development. And in any event., when the code section is
>applied strictly it would leave the owner without sufficient area
>considering height limits to build to the level permitted in the zone
>district. The solution Lance had of allowing a larger but still
restricted
>envelope did not thrill me either because it would an interpretational
>application of the code instead of a strict application. I believe that
the
>language of the section is not ultimately applicable to this property
>because of its size. I think that a finding can be made that none of the
>property is available for food production because no one can practically
hay
>approximately 2 acres of land( the total size minus the set back and
>riparian areas) without it being part of a greater parcel which is not the
>case here. Therefore if we find that the lot is not available for food
>production than the review proceeds as it would have before Lance found
this
>provision.At 12:45 PM 1/15/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>John,
>>In this application, lance and suzannew advised mickey herron that the
>>provisions of 3 -70.60 of our code, requiring preservation of 95%- of
acreage
>>historically available for food production, hay, etc.,, precludes him as
>>hearing officer from allowing the entire 4+ acre parcel from being the
new
>>building envelope. This is a parcel on owl creek, a remainder of the old
>>stapelton ranch ,historically irrigated, but maybe not currently, with
Debbie Quinn, 1:3 , Re: Stapleton 1�y robbins ea
thr
>>old building right next to the road. The proposal is to get rid of the
>>existing building and have the entire parcel available for residence and
>>accessory uses. Lance wants to limit development to a building envelope
of
>>the approximate half acre size, anywhere on the parcel, to correspond
with
>>the size of the existing development, and to satisfy the code
requirement,
>>but is concerned that we have not enforced this code provision in the
past.
>>Do you have any history on this? Lisa, do we have the referral materials
on it?
>>Debbie
>John Ely
J j V.J -_L
IPr nted for Lance ar e < ancec co.pitkin.co.us - > - —��
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lance Clarke, Pitkin County Hearing Officer
FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Planning Office
RE: Stapleton 1041 Hazard Review and Conceptual Submission
DATE: January 8, 1998
REQUEST: The applicant requests 1041 Hazard Review and Conceptual Submission approval for
construction of a single family residence.
APPLICANT: Estate of Marjorie I. Stapleton
REPRESENTATIVE: Jeffrey Hancox, Robert Trown & Associates
LOCATION: 2298 Owl Creek Road; southwest corner of the intersection of Owl Creek Road and
Mandalay Road.
ZONING/LOT SIZE: The property is zoned AFR -10 and contains approximately 4 acres.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains an existing 2,600 square foot two -story wood frame house
and a 1,300 square foot single -story slab on grade garage. The majority of the property is used for hay
production.
REFERRAL AGENCIES: Comments from Zoning, Environmental Health, Aspen Fire Marshal, Historic
Preservation Officer, County Engineer and Wildlife Biologist are incorporated throughout this
memorandum and are attached for reference.
Zoning: Joanna Schaffner notes that the proposed building envelope lies within the 100 foot major road
setback. Structures are not allowed within the setback without the approval of the Board of Adjustment.
Historic Preservation Officer: Amy Guthrie estimates that the house was constructed in the 1910 -20s, based
on its style. However, the house is not included on the County's Historic Inventory, therefore, the County
does not have authority over its demolition. Mrs. Guthrie suggests that the applicant consider certain
options under the Code for preservation of the residence (second residence or caretaker /employee dwelling
unit) or that the house could be offered for relocation.
STAFF COMMENTS
Wildfire: The property is mapped within a low wildfire hazard area. The application was forwarded to, but
not received by, the Colorado State Forest Service. Another copy was sent on December 29, so comments
were not available to include in this packet. The parcel is essentially flat and has been irrigated and used for
hay production, therefore, wildfire hazard is minimal. Staff has included the current wildfire standards of
Section 3- 80.70(C) as conditions of approval.
j�313
Wildlife: Mike Villa, Wildlife Biologist, notes that the parcel is used extensively by deer and elk, and
recommends that a portion of the historic hay fields be removed from the building envelope, which, as
proposed, encompasses over 80% of the parcel. Mr. Villa also recommends the following conditions of
approval:
• Only one dog shall be allowed on the property, and the dog shall be kenneled.
• Fencing shall not exceed 42 inches in height with a maximum of 3 strands of wire or 3 rails.
• All trash /garbage shall be kept in approved bear proof garbage containers.
Fl lain: Owl Creek flows from south to north through the property. The 100 year floodplain for Owl
Creek was delineated by Wright Water Engineers. Their analysis shows that a 100 year event is contained
within the banks of Owl Creek, except in the northeast corner of the parcel, where flooding occurs due to a
blockage in the Owl Creek Road culvert. The building envelope avoids the 100 year floodplain.
Wetlands: Wetlands are located adjacent to and to the east of Owl Creek, except in the northeast corner of
the parcel, where the wetlands also extend to the west of the creek. The wetlands were delineated by
Wright Water Engineers. Riparian areas basically coincide with the boundaries of the wetland areas. The
building envelope avoids the wetland and riparian areas, and complies with the minimum stream setback of
20 feet.
Geologic: The parcel is comprised of slopes of less than 15 %, except the bank adjacent to the creek, which
is not included within the building envelope. The report from Wright Water Engineers notes that the main
soils on the parcel are Fluvaquents, [which] are deep, poorly drained soils.... The USDA Soil Survey
identifies these soils as generally being poorly suited for homesite development due to a seasonally high
water table." Based on these soil conditions, staff recommends that the applicant submit a drainage and
erosion control plan at building permit for review by the County Engineer. Runoff shall be maintained on-
site through landscaping, drainage patterns, dry wells, etc.
Historically Irrigated Pasture: The standards in Section 3 -70 of the Code, Water Resources, are applicable
to all development. Section 3- 70.60(C), Irrigated Areas, states that land uses shall "insure the preservation
of at least 95% of the acreage historically available for human food production, or hay, grain and other feed
crops for livestock." Staff estimates that slightly less than 75% of the 4 acre parcel (2.9 acres) has been
historically irrigated and used for hay production; this figure was determined by subtracting 0.6 acres for the
wetland /floodplain area and 0.5 acres for the previously disturbed area. Therefore, 95% of the historically
irrigated area is approximately 2.75 acres, which would have to be preserved; or 0.15 acre could be
developed. Staff feels that this restriction is excessive given the size of the parcel and the setback
restrictions. Staff would consider limiting the building envelope to the existing disturbed area, which
contains approximately 0.5 acre, however, the majority of this area is located within the required setbacks,
therefore, redevelopment could not occur in this area. Therefore, staff recommends that the building
envelope be limited to 0.5 acre, which corresponds with the amount of the already disturbed area, and that
the envelope be located at the front of the parcel, contiguous to the 100 foot major road setback line. Staff
would also recommend allowing the building envelope to extend within the 100 foot major road setback,
but outside of the 50 foot front yard setback, only to accommodate the septic field (if less than 30 inches in
height). All structures shall be located outside of the 100 foot setback, and all development shall occur
within the building envelope.
00GJ14
Water & Sewer: The existing residence has been served since the 1940s by the Bernard Stapleton Spring
No. 1, which is located approximately 2,000 feet southeast of the house. Betsey Kipp of the Environmental
Health Department notes that the supply is adequate for a single family residence. Water quality tests
showed measurable discoloration, turbidity and hardness, and an elevated coliform count. The applicant
will have to filter and treat the water. The existing septic system was installed in 1974 and repaired in 1989;
it is assumed that a new system will be installed for the new residence. Mrs. Kipp notes that the Owl Creek
area historically has a high groundwater table, therefore, soil tests must be performed during the months of
highest groundwater levels (usually June /July), in order to accurately design the septic system and assure
that water resources will be protected and the aquatic ecosystems undisturbed. The septic system must be
located within the building envelope, and as of January 1, 1998, must be designed by a professional
engineer.
Access: Bud Eylar, County Engineer, notes that access shall remain on Owl Creek Road, and if the
driveway is to be relocated from the existing location, it may only move to the west. Mr. Eylar
recommends that the driveway be narrowed to no more than 16 feet in width to comply with applicable
County standards, and if the access is relocated from the existing location, the applicant shall obtain and the
County Engineer shall approve an access permit prior to issuance of any building permits. Access shall not
be allowed from Mandalay Road, since that would result in wetland, riparian and floodplain impacts.
RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to Section 3- 80.10(B)(2) of the Land Use Code, the Hearing Officer is
authorized to approve a site plan and application for development of one single- family dwelling unit and
customary accessory uses located within certain 1041 hazard areas. Staff recommends approval of the
Stapleton 1041 Hazard Review and Conceptual Submission, subject to the conditions of approval in the
attached Hearing Officer Determination.
Attachments
I . Zoning memo
2. Environmental Health memo
3. County Engineer memo
4. Wildlife Biologist memo
5. Aspen Fire Marshal memo
6. Historic Preservation Officer memo
7. Colorado State Forest Service Comments
Application and Site Plan provided separately
0 J U J 15
Water & Sewer: The existing residence has been served since the 1940s by the Bernard Stapleton Spring
No. 1, which is located approximately 2,000 feet southeast of the house. Betsey Kipp of the Environmental
Health Department notes that the supply is adequate for a single family residence. Water quality tests
showed measurable discoloration, turbidity and hardness, and an elevated coliform count. The applicant
will have to Altgr and treat the water. The existing septic system was installed in 1974 and repaired in 1989;
it is assumed that a new system will be installed for the new residence. Mrs. Kipp notes that the Owl Creek
area historically has a high groundwater table, therefore, soil tests must be performed during the months of
highest groundwater leve s e July), in order to accurately design the septic system and assure
that water resources will be protected and the aquatic ecosystems undisturbed. The septic system must be
located within the building envelope, and as of January 1, 1998, must be designed by a professional
engineer.
Access: Bud Eylar, County Engineer, notes that access shall remain eek Road, and if the
driveway is to be relocated from the existing location, it may onl move to the west. Mr. Ey ar
recommends that the driveway a narrowed to no more than 16 feet in width to comply with applicable
County standards, and if the access is relocated from the existing location, the applicant shall obtain and the
County Engineer shall approve an access permit prior to issuance of any building permits. Access shall not
be allowed from Mandalay Road, since that would result in wetland, riparian and floodplain impacts.
RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to Section 3- 80.10(B)(2) of the Land Use Code, the Hearing Officer is
authorized to approve a site plan and application for development of one single - family dwelling unit and
customary accessory uses located within certain 1041 hazard areas. Staff recommends approval of the
Stapleton 1041 Hazard Review and Conceptual Submission, subject to the conditions of approval in the /
attached Hearing Officer Determination.
cI'ccCU-
Attachments
ct C C _�pq
1. Zoning memo
2. Environmental Health memo
3. County Engineer memo
4. Wildlife Biologist memo
5. Aspen Fire Marshal memo
6. Historic Preservation Officer memo
7. Colorado State Forest Service Comments
Application and Site Plan provided separately
f c'Ft(d '
C;t 1,� 0%q-1
K 1/h. n.�l.C. (ti!•r5 LI, �Z.`' --f' L- I y i, I,t4�iP�•`� (I >
l /�Q rZ �,'r,.�L"�C.C'� -. 1= 'yi(l'- .�Cl ✓�)
Cct., F Sc.1ur I-C St�SLc�
Lvr
� rie�cl.t<�i«d� -cCj cttt,� I
-( d n� c l v 3
u V J J_
MEMORANDUM
To: Lance Clarke, Community Development Department
From: Betsey Kipp, Environmental Health Department 61(,
Date: December 12, 1997
Re: Robbins 1041 Hazard Review
Parcel ID #2735 - 043 -00 -008
The Aspen / Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the details of the
Robbins application under the authority of the Pitkin County Land Use Code and has
the following comments.
ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2 -17 and 3 -1104:
"It is the policy of the County to insure the availability of a water supply of adequate quality, quantity, pressure and dependability
for fire protection and support of a proposed land use prior to approval of the use. The County shall require land uses to hook up
to existing public systems if service is available."
The application provides documentation that domestic water for this property is
obtained from the Bernard Stapleton Spring No.1 and that there is an adequate supply
for a single family residence. The results of the laboratory sampling for the drinking
water revealed an elevated coliform count. Hardness and turbidity counts were also
higher than the recommended limits. Household treatment units include filtration,
ultraviolet light radiation, chlorination, carbon filtration, etc. The applicant should
contact a water filtration and treatment company for recommended alternatives.
Documentation of the quantity and quality of water for domestic use will be required
for the septic system application.
There is no further condition of approval at this time.
SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2 -18 and 3 -1105: "It is the policy of the
County to ensure that adequate sewage treatment facilities are available to serve existing and new developments. Public and
private sewage disposal systems and connections to such systems shall comply with the sewage disposal guidelines of Pitkin
County's Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulation."
rnnkd on RecydM Paper
UUU I
Lots in the Owl Creek area are served by individual septic systems. All such systems
installed within Pitkin County require septic permits issued by the Environmental
Health Department. A septic permit must be issued before a building permit can be
approved. To receive a septic permit, the applicant will need to submit a septic permit
application and appropriate fee; percolation test results and profile hole information;
site plan; floor plan and a copy of the County's 1041 approval. Domestic wastewater
systems will require an engineer design effective January 1, 1998. The septic system
must be located within the building envelope.
The septic system that services the existing dwelling was originally installed in 1974
and repaired in 1989. It is assumed that the proposed single family home will be
serviced by its own septic system. All minimum horizontal setback requirements for
placement of the septic system must be met which includes distances from buildings,
water lines, irrigation ditches and surface waters, and other septic systems on a
property. Setback distances from water sources increase when the calculated waste flow
is in excess of 1,000 gallons per day. A leach field must not be placed in a driveway or
area of traffic.
Pitkin County's Sewage Regulation prohibits a new or expanded septic system to be
installed in a floodplain. The Owl Creek area historically has a high groundwater table
due to the creek and irrigation that occurs in the area. Soil tests must be performed
during the months of highest groundwater levels (usually June, July), so that the septic
system can be designed accurately and with the assurance that the water resources will
be protected and the aquatic ecosystems undisturbed.
A condition of approval for this application is the receipt and approval of the
septic permit by the Environmental Health Department before a building
permit can be issued.
WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Sections 2 -14 and 3 -705 and 3 -710:
"it is the policy of the County to preserve and protect its present water resources. To this end it is the policy of the County that no
land use be initiated which would adversely affect the quantity, quality, or accessibility of the County's water resources; or which
would occur at the expense of established water - dependent agricultural activities; or which would result in increased salinization
of water resources, loss of minimum stream flows, further destruction of wildlife habitat, or major expenditures to reacquire or
redistribute major water resources. It is also the policy of the County to maintain a natural vegetative buffer along its surface
waters such that the surface and groundwaters of the area are not encroached upon by land uses or other human activrhes which
could cause deterioration of water quality or impair the natural treatment processes provided by meadows and wetlands."
The Environmental Health Department will be addressing water quality impacts on
down stream water quality. This application is not expected to impact down stream
water quality if the minimum horizontal distances between components of the system
and physical features are in accordance with the Pitkin County Sewage Regulations.
pnnkd—Re Wraper
:J ti iiU111-8
The Environmental Health Department is charged with preserving and protecting the
quality of Pitkin County's water resources. Since a large percentage of the population is
dependent upon water from wells, elimination of groundwater pollution, and
protection of aquifers and their drainage areas are of utmost importance. Roofs and
asphalt areas can be nonpoint sources of water discharge which can contaminate water
supplies. This Department recommends that nonpoint sources of discharge be retained
on the property of origin which can be accomplished through landscaping, drainage
patterns, detention ponds, and dry wells for water runoff from buildings.
The County Engineer must review the paving and drainage plans for the proposed
project.
AIR QUALITY: Sections 2 -13 and 3 -602:
"Only that development is permitted which will not contribute significantly to degradation of air quality in Pitkin County.
Developments may not constitute an indirect or direct air pollution source under Federal, State or County regulations."
This project is not expected to contribute significantly to degradation of air quality in
Pitkin County.
FIREPLACE
The applicant must file a fireplace /woodstove permit with the Environmental Health
Department before the building permit will be issued. The less densely populated parts
of Pitkin County like this site may have two devices per building: a maximum of one
wood burning fireplace and a second device which can be either a gas log fireplace or a
certified woodstove. In addition, unlimited numbers of decorative gas appliances are
allowed. Coal may not be burned in any device. No wood burning device may be
installed in barns or agricultural buildings.
A condition of approval will be the receipt and approval of the
fireplace /woodstove permit by the Environmental Health Department before
the building permit can be issued.
is the policy of the County to ensure that no use or development of land is permitted
County, the State of Colorado, or the United States of America."
TH LAWS: Section 2 -7: -it
s in violation of the laws of the
This Department is not aware of any issues of concern regarding other environmental
health laws.
Printed on Re,,ded Paper
006J17,
MEMORANDUM
To: Suzanne Wolff
From: Bud Eylar
Date: December 30, 1997
Re: Robbins 1041 Hazard Review
V
Suzanne, I have reviewed the application and have the following comments:
It is noted that the access to the property is to remain on Owl Creek Road. The
present driveway shows as approximately 35 +/- at the property line. It is suggested
that this drive be narrowed to no more than 16 feet in width to meet applicable county
standards. If the location of the drive is to shift, it may only move to the west. Further
if there are significant changes in the location or the length of the drive, the applicant
shall submit plans, including alignment drawings and profiles of the driveway to be
approved before the issuance of a building permit. Under no circumstances shall
access be allowed to Mandalay Ranch Road.
If the development exceeds 5000 sq. ft in size then the applicant shall submit a
Construction Traffic Control and Parking management Plan before the issuance of a
building permit. This shall be submitted to the county engineer for approval. Note:
under no circumstances will construction parking or material storage be allowed on
Owl Creek Road.
UUvj20
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Suzanne Wolff, Planning
FROM: Joanna S. Schaffner, Zoning
DATE: December 26, 1997
RE: Robbins 1041 Hazard Review
Parcel ID# 2735- 043 -00 -008
I have reviewed the above referenced application and offer the following
comments:
ZONE: AFR -10, ten acre minimum lot size
This parcel contains approximately 4 acres and is non - conforming in
size.
SETBACKS: The
100
50
30
30
20
required setbacks for this parcel are
foot Major Road setback as measured
from owl Creek Road right -of -way
foot front yard setback
foot side yard setback
rear yard setback
foot minimum stream setback
The proposed building envelope lies within the 100 foot major road
setback. Development will not be approved in this area without the
approval of the Board of Adjustment. The envelope should be reduced to
eliminate this area.
FLOOR AREA: The maximum allowed floor area on this parcel is a total of
15,000 square feet, and includes all structures.
OTHER: Development is not permitted outside of approved building
envelopes unless specified by this or other County approvals. This
includes entry or ranch gates, septic systems and landscaping.
Is this ranch to be known as Robbins, Stapleton, or Sunshine? There
should be some consistency between the file name, the application name,
and the title of the site plan.
No building permits have been found for the existing structures.
v3u321
MEMORANDUM
TO: Suzanne Woolf -- Community Development Planner
FROM: Michael Villa -- Wildlife Biologist
RE: Robbins Review
DATE: December 29,1997
Suzanne, I have reviewed the Robbins Parcel application and completed a site visit to
the parcel and have the following comments. The development envelope as shown'on
the site plans avoid wetland and riparian habitat. If access remains off of Owl Creek
Road then all wetland impacts will be avoided. If access is attempted off of Mandalay
Rd it will likely result in Wetland, Riparian and Floodplain impacts. The Development
envelope as shown on the site plans encompasses over eighty percent of the total parcel
at 4.0165 acres. The parcel is used extensively by deer and elk. The historic hay fields
have, and continue to receive use by large animals and a large portion should be
maintained. Removal of a portion of the hay fields from the development envelope is
suggested. The following conditions should be applied as conditions of approval.
1. Fencing should comply with CDOW standards 42 inch three strand barbed
wire or three rail fence.
2. Bear proof Garbage containment.
3. One kenneled dog.
These are my comments as they relate to the Robbins application. If you have any
questions please call me at #5395.
I
uJUU2
�.o
MEMO
To: Lance Clark, Community Development Dept.
From: Ed Van Walraven, Fire Marshal
Subject: Robbins 1041 Hazard Review Parcel ID #2735- 043 -00 -008
Date: November 25, 1997
Lance,
This project shall meet all of the applicable codes and requirements of the Aspen Fire Protection
District. This includes, but is not limited to, the installation of the applicable fire sprinkler
system, and access.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
Thank you
��La23
Amy Gut r e, : 4 .2%24J9� obbins IQ4�
X- Sender: amyg @comdev
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 10:49:55 -0700
To: Lancec @ci.aspen.co.us
From: Amy Guthrie <amyg @ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Robbins 1041
Lance, sorry I'm late on this. I've reviewed the application. There is
almost no mention of the existing house in the application, and the
proposed
building envelope runs through it, so I assume they mean to tear it down.
It is a historic house, probably built in the 1910's or 20's based on the
style. It has a really awkward addition slammed onto the front of it right
now.
The house isn't on our lame Pitkin County Inventory, so I really have no
authority over it's demolition. I wonder if Tony has considered the
historic guest house idea? A caretaker unit? It would need some
renovation /restoration probably.
If nothing else, it might be offered for relocation if someone wants to
take it.
0O J24
rP inEe or ance ar e < ancec co.pi- 'tkin.co.us> 1�
OCT.22.1997 9 :39RM
v �[.a ,`37 ,09 39HM
M6
oe6ob®r 21, 1W
IYe:
Board Of
owwaalftef
CO" Will FMPM
110 ee{d pmw
Tire ad* ofAud
ROBERT TROWN ASSOC NO K- P.2
REIELD FECFT039M NW'a r:�'�
i
of y
STEWART
vW w • aBV9L earDwvJO x1911 • 987,86Tr • FPX (M.10M.164
1,
1 '
I
t:
In Sedan 4. T10S, pMW; Our Order No. 24M
r
ere, PMldn Count, Coloma:
pen hee mndue{ed a amptn of 4%apProplo° Mot a Cirq�t�edo at P
p m R nst'Ma(a) o
e f. Stepi0lep
wn *VV. ddMded *We NrW pemd bV dead iMOOBdai3OalOper 1ih . = , ,
61„ 1erdH1 Conveyed aWraurWhq Rloper4► and'IeR Yfe+iUb3 P ae .
1567 hn 11100 at
a rwnaindar. A
ego
of said deed Is afgw{led irefBia- {
or" apprapriP � aerate reeardi, Beano k?w a�*- P*#ur *<
9Ased upEd
cl don, tlrart ek
mrah
deoadarvanY 1, 1g7Z hoe owner of Bro subject preyritly
e�
b) ay a4w,
This sieferr►ertt
a1 womb" On clef SuetWr.$r of 111{e ar+d ID {ntiendrd epeefAwRlr "
of the tabard aF Cprnrf7MelerNre etpilidn
and mm{uel4** for
use
of tinwm of jM r of *k MrwW es said •YrWW 10
end loWcoOrwAf jomft an, n it undersimd an I **@d tlret
9�t owd TINe at
at1aM
, Ina. neNw oeiaht5, wlli de durtg5d wql► argi IN+ar�lY aplM>etlana er
gum
j:•
e{rraer�eq�,
POW p, DowY
�
S.V.P.
i
E
LJ25
;'
OCT.22,1997 9 :30AM ROBERT TROWN ASSOC
UV I CL - 97 by:;?yHM GAM- 1F 1 13 VECKF
.RONALD dARF:ELD"
ANDREW Y. HECRT"d
M=Am I. Immow --
DAVID L. LENYO
mArrBEW C, FER01130Ne
ARISTI S. Fa AROeee'
srm rwl m
pk.TMKNK
»rw uesmd m
w.Mr eremu a Irk
`•-Uw edaA.d m
15761. sw
«serf. ee.Ged ib
w.myhwhl.
GAIRFI ELD & HEMP P.G.
ATTaaNOr5 AS LAW
VWMRIAN SQUARE $1 VINO
6D1 BAST' "MAN AVOM
ASPEN, C01.0RADO 81611
FACS]ty= COM SMT
TO: Mr. )effsey Hama
Robert Trom ex Associates
FAX NO.: 923 -2399
FROM: Michael 3. Herron, Esq. -
• P'; NO. e54' --..P.3
P.1•
DATE: October 22, 1997
RE: Stapleton Property A.
Tool number of P 2 (incluft amt slisfid. If you do not mmmivr-d of 40 '14a16 .0
Ch W m at 970. 925.1936 as soon as Possible•
lt4MTANT: THIS COMMUNICATION IS i MI)ED SOMLY FOR THE USE OF TiM Na MP AMU V t
OR OTHERS AUTHORIZED To RECEIVE IT. THIS COM MUNKAIION MAY IU VS.EW AND
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND ANY USE, DISSH•IMATON� OA REFRODOCt1 {Y t111�►1#fFI nLA
PERSOM IS ANCLU7ELY PROMITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNIQ i!1 it
NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY,
THESE ARE TRANdMrMD:
For Approval
For Your Sly UKv
For R�eN w an/ d CoMnmt
�.� At Requoted
!1�uuj26
s
PLEASE TAKE THE FOLLOWING AC:"R!
ROMM
GA Upon Receipt aed R%'
i il�l�iioded e11 fa7C1e61wPtt
I
>�
`'A•ReiL
_ `-
Fldrt�a
'.dP':'1r:
Fi-
DATE: October 22, 1997
RE: Stapleton Property A.
Tool number of P 2 (incluft amt slisfid. If you do not mmmivr-d of 40 '14a16 .0
Ch W m at 970. 925.1936 as soon as Possible•
lt4MTANT: THIS COMMUNICATION IS i MI)ED SOMLY FOR THE USE OF TiM Na MP AMU V t
OR OTHERS AUTHORIZED To RECEIVE IT. THIS COM MUNKAIION MAY IU VS.EW AND
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND ANY USE, DISSH•IMATON� OA REFRODOCt1 {Y t111�►1#fFI nLA
PERSOM IS ANCLU7ELY PROMITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNIQ i!1 it
NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY,
THESE ARE TRANdMrMD:
For Approval
For Your Sly UKv
For R�eN w an/ d CoMnmt
�.� At Requoted
!1�uuj26
s
PLEASE TAKE THE FOLLOWING AC:"R!
ROMM
GA Upon Receipt aed R%'
i il�l�iioded e11 fa7C1e61wPtt
I
SEP. 8.1997 3:01PM STEWART TITLE ASPEN
STEWART TIME OF ASPEN INC
OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBR OU REPORT
Order No.: 00023 �42-c5
PREPARED FOR: �ic�ARSIBLD AND RacaT, P.C.
STEWART 7711.E Of ASPEN, AVC.
HEREBY CERTN EI from a search of the books in this office that title to:
See Attached Legal Description
situated in the Coto I of Pitkin, State of Colorado, appears to be vested in the name of..
THE ESTATE bF MAR,70ASS I. STAPLBTON
and that the above described property appears to be subject to the following liens:
1. NONE
NO. 701 P.2
EXCEPT any and all razes and assessments.
EXCEPT all easemer. rs, rights of way, restrictions and reservations of record.
This report does not teflect any of the following matters:
(1) Bankruptcies width, from date of adjudication of the most recent banbVtcies, antedate the report by more than
fourteen (14) years.
(2) Suits and judgmll which, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven (7) years or until the
governing statuelof limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period.
(3) Unpaid tax lien] which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven years.
Although we believe dhe faeu stated are true, this letter is not to be construed as an abstract of title, nor an opinion
of title, nor a guarm ay of title, and it is understood and agreed that Stewart TYtle of Aspen, Inc., neither assumes,
nor will be charged Trh any financial obligation or liability whatever on any statement contained herein.
Dated: rune 09, 1997 at 7.30 A.M. , at Aspen, Colorado
STEWART T= QF ASPEN, INC.
«SEP. 8.1997 3 :01PM STEWRRT TITLE RSPEN
STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN INC.
OWNERSHIP AND ENCUAhF160 ;E REPORT
OrderNo.: 000231i42 -c5 - --
PREPARED FOR: IcA"zzzv Anm ExcST, P. c.
STEWART ITT7.E OF, ASPEN, INC.
HEREBY CERTIFIES from a search of the books in this office that title to:
See Attached Legal Deacription
V
situated in the Counrl of Pitkin, State of Colorado, appears to be vested in the name of.-
THE ESTATE bH MUM= Z. STAPZZT=
and that the above described property appears to be subject to the following liens:
1. NONE �
NO. 701 P.2
EXCEPT any and oil taxes and assessments.
EXCEPT all easemer rs, rights of way, restrictions and reservations of record.
This report does not teflect any of the following matters:
(1) Bankruptcies which, from date of adjudication of the most recent bankruptcies, antedate the report by more than
fourteen (14) ye s.
(2) Suiu and judgmF which, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven (7) years or until the
governing statuelIof limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period.
(3) Unpaid tax ;leg which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven years.
Although we believe d facts stared are true, this letter is not to be construed as an abstract of title, nor an opinion
of title, nor a of title, and it is understood and agreed that Stewart n1le of Aspen, Inc., neither assumes,
nor will be charged �ytth any frnancial obligation or liability whatever on any statement contained herein.
Dated: rune 091, 1997 at 7:30_A.M. , at Aspen, Colorado
S7EWART TTTZE QFASPEN, INC.
I
SEP -24 -1997 07:44 FROM ASPEN /PITKIN COM DEV TO 9- 9232599 P.03
4 44t,
� a
Cow vnJNrrY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PTTKIN COUNTY (h r COUNTi� and
�/) /� (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. APPLICANT bas submitted to COUNTY an applicationf f6
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Pitkin County Resolution
No. 95 -326 establishes a fee structure for Planning applications and the payment of
all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application
completeness.
3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or
scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full
extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and
COUNTY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties to allow
APPLICANT to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit
additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT
agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make
additional payments upon notification by the COUNTY when they are necessary as
costs are incurred. COUNTY agrees it will be benefited through the greater
certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. COUNTY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for
COUNTY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the
planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to enable the
Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to 'make legally
required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in hill 060
to decision.
,: v
SEP -24 -1997 07:44 FROM ASPEWPITKIN COM DEV TO 9- 9232599 P.04
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the
COUNTY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of
application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amoi
of S which is for _ hours of Planning staff time, and if actual ieoorded costs
exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to
COUNTY to reimburse the COUNTY for the processing of the application
mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be
made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to
pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing.
PIT143N COLMY
Cindy Houben
Communitv Development Director
JOLJ30
2
APPLICANT
1 t*lq 4 -m
1-1--
Date:
Mailing Address:
-Po6VX �8a
S%I117� 55 (/114a 9e
eo. SOWS'
4,,.4 .
I MN
TOTAL P.04
00 - 008"
9-?
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
Michael ]. Herron, Esq.
GARFIELD u HECHT, P.C.
601 East Hyman Avenue
Aspen, Colorado 81611
STATUTORY POWER OF ATTORNEY
NOTICE: UNLESS YOU LIMIT THE POWER IN THIS DOCUMENT,
THIS DOCUMENT GIVES YOUR AGENT THE POWER TO ACT FOR YOU,
WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT, IN ANY WAY THAT YOU COULD ACT FOR
YOURSELF. THE POWERS GRANTED BY THIS DOCUMENT ARE BROAD
AND SWEEPING. THEY ARE EXPLAINED IN THE "UNIFORM
STATUTORY FORM POWER OF ATTORNEY ACT", PART 13 OF ARTICLE
1 OF TITLE IS, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, AND PART 6 OF
ARTICLE 14 OF TITLE IS., COLORADO REVISED STATUTES. IF YOU
HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THESE POWERS, OBTAIN COMPETENT
LEGAL ADVICE. THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANYONE TO
MAKE MEDICAL OR OTHER HEALTH -CARE DECISIONS FOR YOU. YOU
MAY REVOKE THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IF YOU LATER WISH TO DO
SO.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS TO GIVE THE
PERSON YOU DESIGNATE (YOUR "AGENT "), BROAD POWERS TO
HANDLE YOUR PROPERTY AND AFFAIRS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE
POWERS TO PLEDGE, SELL, OR OTHERWISE DISPOSE OF ANY REAL OR
PERSONAL PROPERTY WITHOUT ADVANCE NOTICE TO YOU OR
APPROVAL BY YOU. THIS FORM DOES NOT IMPOSE A DUTY ON
YOUR AGENT TO EXERCISE GRANTED POWERS; BUT WHEN POWERS
ARE EXERCISED, YOUR AGENT MUST USE DUE CARE TO ACT FOR
YOUR BENEFITAND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS
FORM AND MUST KEEP A RECORD OF RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS,
AND SIGNIFICANT ACTIONS TAKEN AS AGENT. YOU MAY NAME
SUCCESSOR AGENTS UNDER THIS FORM BUT NOT CO-AGENTS. UNTIL
YOU REVOKE THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY OR A COURT ACTING ON
YOUR BEHALF TERMINATES IT, YOUR AGENT MAY EXERCISE THE
POWERS GIVEN HERE THROUGHOUT YOUR LIFETIME, EVEN AFTER
YOU MAY BECOME DISABLED, UNLESS YOU EXPRESSLY LIMIT THE
DURATION OF THIS POWER IN THE MANNER PROVIDED BELOW.
M. \micmmpNwp60 \OM) H \SUNSHIN E.RCH\poa
u O G, 0 s 1 1111111 11111 111111 1111 111111111111 IIIII III IIIII IIII IIII
426394 01/08/1999 01:28P POR DAVIS SILVI
1 of 7 R 36.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
YOU MAY HAVE OTHER RIGHTS OR POWERS UNDER COLORADO
LAW NOT SPECIFIED IN THIS FORM.
I, Sam Georges, Manager of Sunshine Ranch, LLC, a Colorado limited liability
company, of Pitkin County, Colorado, appoint Michael J. Herron of Aspen, Colorado
as my agent (attorney -in -fact) to act for me in any lawful way with respect to the
following initialed subjects:
TO GRANT ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING POWERS, INITIAL
THE LINE IN FRONT OF EACH POWER YOU ARE GRANTING. TO
WITHHOLD A POWER, DO NOT INITIAL THE LINE IN FRONT OF IT.
YOU MAY, BUT NEED NOT, CROSS OUT EACH POWER WITHHELD.
Initi,C
(A) _ Real property transactions (when properly recorded).
(B) _ Tangible personal property transactions.
(C) _ Stock and bond transactions.
(D) _ Commodity and option transactions.
(E) Banking and other financial institution transactions.
(F) _ Business operating transactions.
(G) _ Insurance and annuity transactions.
(H) _ Estate, trust, and other beneficiary transactions.
(1) _ Claims and litigation,
(J) _ Personal and family maintenance.
(K) _ Benefits from Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, or other governmental
programs or military service.
(L) Retirement plan transactions.
(M) _ Tax matters.
UNLESS YOU DIRECT OTHERWISE, THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS
EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY AND WILL CONTINUE UNTIL IT IS REVOKED
OR TERMINATED AS SPECIFIED BELOW. STRIKE THROUGH AND WRITE
YOUR INITIALS TO THE LEFT OF THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE IF YOU
DO NOT WANT THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY TO CONTINUE IF YOU
BECOME DISABLED, INCAPACITATED, OR INCOMPETENT.
I. ( ) This power of attorney will continue to be effective even though
1 become disabled, incapacitated, or incompetent.
M: \mic temp \"60 \OM]H \SUNSHINE.RCH \poa 2
3 i1 � U-13 2 1 11111 1111 11111 1111 HIM 11111 11��1111 �111�I1111 IN
2 of 7 R 36.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
YOU MAY INCLUDE ADDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS ON THE
AGENT'S POWERS IN THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IF THEY ARE
SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED BELOW.
2. The powers granted above shall not include the following powers or shall
be modified or limited in the following manner (here you may include any specific
limitations you deem appropriate, such as a prohibition of or conditions on the sale of
particular stock or real estate or special rules regarding borrowing by the agent):
Limited by the provisions of paragraph 4 below.
3. In addition to the powers granted above, I grant my agent the following
powers (here you may add any other delegable powers, such as the power to make
gifts, exercise powers of appointment, name or change beneficiaries or joint tenants,
or revoke or amend any trust specifically referred to below): None.
4. Special instructions. On the following lines you may give special
instructions to your agent: This Power of Attorney is limited specifically to the
execution by Michael 1 Herron on behalf of Sunshine Ranch, LLC, a Colorado limited
liability company of a 1041 Plat Map for certain real property owned by the Company
and for no other purposes whatsoever. A legal description of the property of the
Company for which this plat map governs is attached hereto and made a part hereof
as Exhibit "A."
YOUR AGENT WILL BE ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL
REASONABLE EXPENSES INCURRED IN ACTING UNDER THIS POWER
OF ATTORNEY. STRIKE THROUGH AND INITIAL THE NEXT SENTENCE
IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR AGENT TO ALSO BE ENTITLED TO
REASONABLE COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES AS AGENT.
THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY MAY BE AMENDED IN ANY MANNER
OR REVOKED BY YOU AT ANY TIME. ABSENT AMENDMENT OR
REVOCATION, THE AUTHORITY GRANTED IN THIS POWER OF
ATTORNEY IS EFFECTIVE WHEN THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS SIGNED
AND CONTINUES IN EFFECT UNTIL YOUR DEATH, UNLESS YOU MAKE
A LIMITATION ON DURATION BY COMPLETING THE FOLLOWING:
M:\m¢ temp \wp60 \0M]H \5U NSHINE.RCH \poa 3
3 3 U 0 3 3 1 111111 IIIII 111111 IIII 111111 111111
426394 01/08/1999 01:26P POR DAVIS SILVI
3 of 7 R 36.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
6. This power of attorney terminates on January 31, 1999 (insert a future
date or event, such as court determination of your disability, when you want this
power to terminate prior to your death).
BY RETAINING THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH, YOU MAY, BUT
ARE NOT REQUIRED TO, NAME YOUR AGENT AS GUARDIAN OF YOUR
PERSON OR CONSERVATOR OF YOUR PROPERTY, OR BOTH, IF A
COURT PROCEEDING IS BEGUN TO APPOINT A GUARDIAN OR
CONSERVATOR, OR BOTH, FOR YOU. THE COURT WILL APPOINT
YOUR AGENT AS GUARDIAN OR CONSERVATOR, OR BOTH, IF THE
COURT FINDS THAT SUCH APPOINTMENT WILL SERVE YOUR BEST
INTERESTS AND WELFARE. STRIKE THROUGH AND INITIAL
PARAGRAPH 7 IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR AGENT TO ACT AS
GUARDIAN OR CONSERVATOR, OR BOTH.
7.( ) If a guardian of my person or a conservator for my property, or
both, are to be appointed, I nominate the agent acting under this power of attorney
as such guardian or conservator, or both, to serve without bond or security.
IF YOU WISH TO NAME SUCCESSOR AGENTS, INSERT THE NAME
AND ADDRESS OF ANY SUCCESSOR AGENT IN THE FOLLOWING
PARAGRAPH:
8. If any agent named by me shall die, become incapacitated, resign, or
refuse to accept the office of agent, I name the following each to act alone and
successively, in the order named, as successor to such agent: Not Applicable.
For purposes of this paragraph 8, a person is considered to be incapacitated if
and while the person is a minor or a person adjudicated incapacitated or if the person
is unable to give prompt and intelligent consideration to business matters, as certified
by a licensed physician.
I agree that any third party who receives a copy of this document may act under
it. Revocation of the power of attorney is not effective as to a third parry until the
third parry learns of the revocation. I agree to indemnify the third parry for any claims
that arise against the third party because of reliance on this power of attorney.
Signed on December 1. ( , 1998.
M: \mic temp \.p60 \OM] H \SUNSHIN E.RCH\poa
�;_� �s 1 11111111111111111 1111 HIM Mill 1111111111111111 IN
4 of 7 R 36.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
IF THERE IS ANYTHING ABOUT THIS FORM THAT YOU
DO NOT UNDERSTAND, IT MAY BE IN YOUR BEST
INTEREST TO CONSULT A COLORADO LAWYER RATHER THAN SIGN
THIS FORM.
SUNSHINE RANCH, LLC, a
Colorado limited liability
By:
Sam Ge s an
. - D %kM
(Your Social Security number)
YOU MAY, BUT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO, REQUEST YOUR AGENT
AND SUCCESSOR AGENTS TO PROVIDE SPECIMEN SIGNATURES
BELOW. IF YOU INCLUDE SPECIMEN SIGNATURES IN THIS POWER OF
ATTORNEY, YOU MUST COMPLETE THE CERTIFICATION OPPOSITE THE
SIGNATURES OF THE AGENTS.
NOTICE TO AGENTS: BY EXERCISING POWERS UNDER
THIS DOCUMENT, THE AGENT ASSUMES THE FIDUCIARY
AND OTHER LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF AN AGENT UNDER
COLORADO LAW.
Specimen Signatures of Agent
Agent
That the signature of my agent
SUNSHINE RANCH, LLC, a Colorado
limited liability
Principal
ACKNOWLEDGMENT PAGE TO FOLLOW
M: \mic[emp \wp60 \OM] H \SUNSH IN E.RCH\P.a
G
0 (.i u
0 J
1 111111 11111
5 426394
111111 1111 111111 11111111111
01/08/1999 01:28P
POR
III
DAVIS
11111 IIII 1111
SILVI
5 of 7
R 36.00 D 0.00 N 0.00
PITKIN
COUNTY CO
CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
ban Dte- GC ss.
County of ._JL� '
On I2-.2Z-G8 before me,GLU � Qom_ %IDyrA: jI 1�'U -WI(
Data ^ Name and Title of Officer (efg , "Jane Doe, Notary Pu Is "j
personally appeared
)1 personally known to me
❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
to be the personA whose name() is /946
subscribed to the within instrument and
C,&EILNM acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed
GomrnkSWn 0118143N
Notayft�_C.a11tarrip the same in his /Vr /tk(eir authorized
Son DkVpCOLNM capacityVs), and that by his /her /tt�,Iir
µyCpnm_f>�resMOy1. 17t signature(d) on the instrument the personA, or
the entity upon behalf of which the personX
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNE my hand and official seal.
Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Note ry Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Doc ent ( �1
Title or Type of Document: rD (1)Q.i� 07 A *0 (nf y
Document Date: Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above.
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name:
❑ Individual Top of thumb here
❑ Corporate Officer — Tltle(s):
❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General
❑ Attorney in Fact
❑ Trustee
❑ Guardian or Conservator
❑ Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Q 199 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave , P O Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402
'-1 111111 IIIII 111111 I'll HIM 111111 IIIII III HIM IIII IIII
VU�'�36 6Zef97 R136.00 D 0.00 ZNP SILVI
0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
Prod No 5901 Header Gau ionl 1-dav io-oeu
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF LOT 9 10 13 AND 14, AND THE WEST IN SECTION 4 TOiN
OF2THE 6th P.M.. MORE FULLY DESW BEDS ASPFOLLOWSTH, RANGE 85 WEST
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH FENCE OF OWL CREEK ROAD-FROM
WHICH THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 4 BEARS N 69'01'11'E 2,634.66 FEET;
THENCE S09058'25'E 72.40 FEET-
THENCE S07.15'51'W 139.90 FEEL;
THENCE SII•ll'35 "W 257.65 FEET;
THENCE N89.59'55'W 349.75 FEET;
THENCE NOI.32'35'E 455.73 FEET TO THE SOUTH FENCE OF SAID OWL CREEK ROAD;
THENCE S89'57'47'E 166.98 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH FENCE OF OWL CREEK ROAD;
THENCE S89.35'55'E 189.88 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH FENCE OF OWL CREEK ROAD;
THENCE N76'21'41'E 37.18 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH FENCE OF OWL CREEK ROAD
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
COUNTY OF PITKIN
STATE OF COLORADO
1111111 Hill 111111111111111111111111111111 Hill IIII IN
426394 01/08/1999 01:28P PDA DAVIS SILVI
J 37 7 of 7 R 36.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY
} ss. POSTING OF A PUBLIC HEARING
State of Colorado
FOR A PITKIN COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The undersigned, being first dul sworn, deposes and says as follows:
I, being or representing an Applicant for a Pitkin
County Development Permit, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately
represents the sign posted as notice of the public hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on
the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the sign was posted
Z u
and visible continuously from the Z d ay of OFL 19!�Jto the day of I � '
CC�e2,
19Ji✓(Must be posted for at least 15 days before the public hearing).
000038
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 31a day of
}Dvcan6 -� -191 by 4u. Nco r
i
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
My commission expires: 11 -7 -1999
Lk L!� 61?a466 -f, - —
Notary Public's Signature
/3o S, 6o- lark, A yo-.. Po- 2& 11
Address
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
RE: STAPLETON 1041 HAZARD REVIEW
d
I hereby certify that on this 28th day of November, 1997, a true and correct copy of the
attached Notice of Public Hearing was deposited in the United States mail, first -class postage
prepaid, to the adjacent property owners as indicated on the attached list of adjacent property
owners which was supplied to the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office by the applicant in regard to the
case named on the Public Notice.
By: Sharon Hirman
Administrative Assistant
u sl U 3 y
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: STAPLETON 1041 HAZARD REVIEW
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Thursday, January 8, 1997 at
a meeting to begin at 10:00 am before the Pitkin County Hearing Officer, Commissioners Meeting
Room, 506 East Main Street, Aspen to consider an application submitted by Bernard Stapleton
requesting 1041 Hazard Review approval to construct a single family residence. The property is
located 2298 Owl Creek Road, and is described as a tract of land being part of Lot 9, 10, 13 and 14,
and the West 1/2 of the SE 1/4, in Section 4, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M.
For further information contact Suzanne Wolf at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development
Department, (970) 920 -5093.
s/Lance Clarke
Pitkin County Hearing Officer
Published in The Aspen Times on December 6, 1997
Pitkin County Account No. 00113.
1041 Review
List of Surroundina Neiahbors
Owl Creek Association
P.O. Box 6902
Snowmass Village, CO 81615
Mr. Peter Guber
Astair Building, 3rd Floor
Culver City, CA 90232
Mr. Bob Daniel
cto Hines
426 E. Main St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Mr. Gary Snook
1881 Owl Creek Road
Aspen, CO 81611
Mr & Mrs Charles Rolles
P.O. 10023
Aspen, CO 81612
Mr. & Mrs. Hugh M. Eaton III
Old Troy Road
Dublin, NH 03444
' Mr. Robert Scinto
One Corporate Dr.
Suite 100
Shelton, CT 06484
i;OuAl
Mr. & Mrs. Joel Cohen
0881 Cluny Road
Aspen, CO 81611
Mr. & Mrs. Richard Cantor
Neuberger & Berman
605 Third Ave.
New York, NY 10158 -3698
0 0,06J42
ASPEN/PIT;,, ,l COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, ,PARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920 -5090 FAX# (970) 920 -5439
October 28, 1997
Kevin Morley
Robert Trown & Associates
P.O. Box 6820
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Re: Robbins 1041 Hazard Review
Case #P115 -97
Dear Kevin,
The Planning staff has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have
determined that this application is complete. After a more detailed review of the submittal
information, additional information specific to the application may be requested in order to
adequately review and process the application. The planner in charge of the review will
request the information from you directly.
We have scheduled this application for review at a public hearing by the Pitkin County Hearing
Officer on Thursday, January 8, 1998 at a meeting to begin at 10:00 a.m. in the Commissioners
Meeting Room in the Courthouse. Should this date be inconvenient for you please contact me
within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda date will be considered final
and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable
technical problems. The Monday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of
the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Community Development Department.
We have forwarded a copy of this application to the Colorado State Forest Service for referral
comments. Please contact them directly at (970) 248 -7325 to arrange for payment of their fees.
Comments will not be released until payment is received.
Please note that it is your responsibility to post the subject property with a sign within 15 days of
the public hearing and to remove it from the property within one week following the hearing.
Please submit the enclosed Affidavit of Notice by Posting as proof of compliance with the Code
prior to or at the hearing.
If you have any questions, please call Lance Clarke the planner assigned to your case, at 920 -5452.
Sincerely,
Sharon Hirman
Administrative Assistant
��J43
_• ASPEN/PITKIN '
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920 -5090 FAX (970)920 -5439
October 13, 1997
Robert Trown & Assoc.
c/o Jeff Hancox
P.O Box 6820
Snowmass Village, CO 81615
Re: Stapleton
Case #P116 -97
Dear: Jeff,
The Community Development Department has completed its preliminary review of the captioned
application. We have determined that this application is incomplete. The application will not be
scheduled for review until the following items are submitted.
Need proof of non - merger of land - 49 on preapplication
If you have any questions, please call, Lance Clarke the Planner assigned to this case, at 920 -5452.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Sharon Hirman
Administrative Assistant
J0luiJ44
n
w
iw
MAY- -0i -1997 09:49 FROM ASPEN /PITKIN COM DEV TO
9- 9232599 P.02
PITKIN COUNTY
PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
DATE: May 1, 1996 PLANNER: Lance Clarke
PROJECT: Robbins 1041 Hazard Review
L" OWNER: Anthony Robbins
6.
LOCATION: Owl Creek Road
i
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Kevin Morley PHONE: 9
1. Type of application: 1041 Hazard Review and General Submission]
2. Describe action/type of development being requested: Applicant proposes to
establish building envelope to construct single - family home.
i
3. Areas in which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of reports
requested:
• Please provide submission requirements specified in Land Use Code Section 5- 70.20.
• There should be a letter /written report describing the action proposed and addressing
the impacts the action will have on any 1041 hazard areas as described in Land Use
Code Section 3 -80. Staff has identified potential concerns with fl000plain areas, and
wetland and/or riparian areas (3 -80.80 0.).
• The site utilization maps shall clearly show the parcel, proposed building envelope,
and topography.
• Please provide any known information about the existing structures on site; date of
construction, etc.
A 1041 Site Plan Plat meeting the requirements of Code Section 5 -70.4Q will be required.
After approval this plat must also be submitted in a digital format for intl;gration into the
County GIS system.
4. Referrals to: Attorney, Engineer, Zoning, Environmental Health, State Forest
Service, Division of Wildlife, County Wildlife Biologist, Homeowner's Assoc., Aspen
Fire, Historic Preservation Planner. i
5. Review is before: Hearing Officer.
6. Public Hearing: Yes.
'i J 15
MAY -01 -1997 09:50 FROM ASPEN /PITKIN COM DEV TO 9- 9232599 P.03
L
r^
y� 7. Applicant is required to post signs for public hearing: Yes.
T° 8. Applicant is to submit list of adjacent property owners: Yes. Applicant shall
., provide stamped, addressed, letter -sized envelopes, with the return address of the
Community Development Department. for mailing to all adjacent property owners.
L 9. Disclosure/Proof of ownership: Yes (two copies). Will need documentation of how
and when the parcel was created and proof of non - merger.
'" 10. Number of copies of application to be submitted: 12.
11. What deposit was Applicant requested to submit: $870.00 ( $450 Planning, $155
Engineer, $155 Environmental Health, $110 Clerk). An `Agreement to 'Pay" form must
a, be submitted with the application.
If there are any questions please call Lance Clarke, 920 -5452.
m.
r
TOTAL P.03
I
a
w
r
APR 16 '97 oe :06PM WAGAR AND ASSOCIATEVX9
°J!G 'A1 OffY.
P.4
1
r
ar
r
er
t %*
k9
i
8nov+ mass Village - Owl Create Road - AsPen
�! 394.04' _
fig
.......... y,+le ...�.
. , / �j*
-,I .......... ,' ,, ; •,
.i•""...... ;
349.75'
4.0176 acres
Y1
O�
Or
�O
Q
C:
y/A IM�p aairittl. O[.
I•r. wr
�r y
TOTFL P.03
wnrw��w
i
i
8nov+ mass Village - Owl Create Road - AsPen
�! 394.04' _
fig
.......... y,+le ...�.
. , / �j*
-,I .......... ,' ,, ; •,
.i•""...... ;
349.75'
4.0176 acres
Y1
O�
Or
�O
Q
C:
y/A IM�p aairittl. O[.
I•r. wr
�r y
TOTFL P.03
id.
N.
1041 Review
3 -80.80 G : Riparian, Shoreland and Wetland Areas Responses to questions.
The new residence will be sited within the proposed building envelope in such a way that
terrestrial vegetation will be maintained, and erosion and sedimentation will be at a
minimum. Since the building site will not be located near Owl Creek, the existing cold
water temperatures will not be effected.
2. The development of the site has been done in such a way as to be in compliance with
Section 3 -70 and Section 3- 50.40. Please refer to Addendum A prepared by Wright
Water Engineers for further detail.
3. It is our intention to develop the site to minimize the disturbance of ground cover adjacent
to Owl creek. The building envelope that been decided upon for the site will not allow the
residence to be built near Owl Creek due to standard stream setbacks.
4. The area of the site where the proposed building will be built was originally used for
agricultural purposes. As a result the surrounding area adjacent to the proposed
building site contains no native species of vegetation, nor is it near wetland or riparian
areas. Additionally the proposed building will not be built near Owl Creek.
5. There will be no changes to the portion of Owl Creek that crosses the property.
6. Any culverts placed on the property will be placed along Owl Creek Road for road
drainage purposes only and will in no way effect the creek itself.
7. See #4 above.
8. Not Applicable.
9. See #5 above.
10. See #4 and #5 above.
11. Not Applicable.
12. See #4 and #5 above.
13. Not Applicable.
0'i , 4 8(
1041 Review
r-
Proposed action
w, The client proposes a two -story wood frame residence with a basement and attached garage. A
one story out - building may be proposed as well. Access to the site will be via Owl Creek Road
r
ar
uUVJ_4
1041 Review
Existing structures on site
The site consists of a 2,600 sq.ft., two story wood frame house and a 1,300 sq.ft. single story slab
on grade garage (see fig.1 and fig.2). The date of construction is not known. The buildings are
situated towards the front of the site along Owl Creek Rd. (see site plan). Site photographs show
that the property is primarily used for hay production (see figs. 3 - 4).
000050
Figure 1
Figure 2
I
1
Figure 3
000051 Figure
-0
.r F. . m
RONALD GARFIELD-
ANDREW V. FIHCHT"
MICHAELJ.HERRON464
DAVID L. LENYO -
"' MATTHEW C.FERGUSON-
KRISTI S. FERRARO ""
.r
• ali0 i l, Bali
a Ne4 Voraik Bar
District irl ro
ier arC altaala for
•'• also Nmit<d to
Florida Bar
.....bt admit d to
Ponnrylvanik Bar
r
GAR FIELD Q BECHT, P.C.
AI'TORNEYS AT LAW
VICTORIAN SQUARE BUILDING
601 EAST I4YMAN AVENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 1
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
TELEPHONE
(970) 925.1936
TELECOPIER
(970) 925.3008
E-mail
garheehtrerornet
y° TO: Mr. ]effrey Hancox
Robert Trown at Associates
FAX NO.: 923.2599
FROM: Michael 1. Herron, Esq.
DATE: September 19, 1997
RE: Stapleton Property
Total nuinlibei of pages% (including cover sheet). If you do not receive all of the pages, please call
Christina at 970925 -1 36.as soon as possible.
w "OKrANEd1i H*cOMMUNICATION IS INTENDED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE
• OR OTHERS AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE IT. THIS COMMUNICATION MAY INCLUDE PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND ANY USE, DISSEMINATION, OR REPRODUCTION BY UNAUTHORIZED
9- PERSONS IS ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE
NOTIFY ITH11,31111111111111t IMMEDIATELY.
_ THESE ARE R41TTED: PLEASE TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTION-
Return
For Your siputure _ _ Call Upon Receipt and Review
- For Review and Comment XXX Call if you have any questions
— As Re9ueuM ,
U U352 i_.
1H03H QI3IJdIJ0 WdVT:26 L6. 6T d3S
.'foMlrhael x 2BUSr El Jabal CO 81x828 El Jebel C 1626 USA ad Brownson 970-M-3146 cht PC. From: 09 -19 -1997 10331W9 inJeseor LJest Realty
ll
d/1 told/ Iu.�. is reye c vi c
.,.470 963 8702 P.01
mderowd ho RW canes cairor, wfsh the Prim Y
m of it P m 21041 LaAd Use ApPp
p�OMoe.
D>IM� SeO I g� 19970
TM WAn OF ISM L gTAKSTON
by: Bernard gyp. �rso� i pr�sntasYw .
;u 153`
C.-mAke 6WE-T, L60 ST dm
TOTAL P.01
1HJ3H G7MA UO WdbT:20 46. 6T d3S
SEF. a. 19V 3:02PM STEWFRT TITLE ASPEN
No.re1
L. SCHEDULE A
4jpdes Nw4e7: 0009 642 -CS
LEGAL DESCMUON
A toad of land being part of fete 9, 30, 13 and 140 sad the Neat
1/2 of the BB 3/4, in Bedtion 4, 1bwmanip l0 South, Mange 85 Neat
*• the 6tb 8 X.. ilat^e fully described as follows:
w
of
Megiamiar.
t e past on the South fusee of owl Creek road from
8eetios 4 bases North 89 degrees
.hielt•tbe
03 minates
t'1/4 oesaar of said
31 saeemds Bast '2, 634.66 feet;
25 aepoada Sae&
72.40
feet;
themes Bat
09 degrees 58 minutes
19 minutes 51 ocean" West,
139.90
feet;
thence Bev
07 degrees
33 degrees 11 minutes 35 aeeoada West,
257.65
fast;
thence Bou
S9 degrees 99 mlautea 55- seconds (west,
349.75
loot:
thence
01' degraes 32 minutes 35 aeeouda Saat,
455.73
feet Co
themes
the South
cape of said owl Creek Road;
47 ocean" East,
166.98
feet
t�teade Bon
t9 degrees 57 minutes
almg the
tY fence of owl Creek road;
35 55 aeeoods Bust,
189.88
feet
thence Boa a9 degrees minutes
&I the Bath fence of 0wl Creek road;
goat,
37.18
feet
tpeaee
._ 7f degree/ 21 minutes 41 aeeonda
of Owl Creek road to the point of beginning'
along the.
outh fens
County of +tkia, State of Colorado
uILJ54
E'd
1HO3H G-13IAdUO WdSI:20 G6. 6T d3S
1041 Review
List of Surrounding Neighbors
Owl Creek Association
P.O. Box 6902
Snowmass Village, CO 81615
Mr. Peter Guber
Astair Building, 3rd Floor
Culver City, CA 90232
Mr. Bob Daniel
'
Go Hines
426 E. Main St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Mr. Gary Snook
1881 Owl Creek Road
Aspen, CO 81611
Mr & Mrs Charles Rolles
P.O. 10023
Aspen, CO 81612
µ.
Mr. & Mrs. Hugh M. Eaton III
Old Troy Road
�.
Dublin, NH 03444
Mr. Robert Scinto
One Corporate Dr.
Suite 100
Shelton, CT 06484
Jig '(jJ55
V
-- ;O A56
Mr. & Mrs. Joel Cohen
0881 Cluny Road
Aspen, CO 81611
Mr. & Mrs. Richard Cantor
Neuberger & Berman
605 Third Ave.
New York, NY 10158 -3698
V
-- ;O A56
Addendum A
w
w
w
L"n
I Wright Water
Inc.
818 Colorado Ave
O Box 219
91enwood Springs, Colorado 81602
i-- ;9701945 -7755 TEL
19701945 -9210 FAX
13031 893 -1608 DENVER DIRECT LINE
irk
R
August 29, 1997
Robert Sinclair
Robert Trown & Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 6820
Snowmass Village, CO 81615
RE: Robbins 1041 Environmental Hazards Review
Dear Rob:
a At your request, Wright Water Engineers (WWE) conducted floodplain, wetland, water supply,
and geologic hazards analyses for the property at 2298 Owl Creek Road in accordance with our
proposal dated July 15, 1997. This letter report presents our findings. A Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment (ESA) was submitted under separate cover dated August 13, 1997 by our sister
r company Waste Engineering, Inc. (WEI).
The subject property (referred to as the Stapleton parcel) is a 4± acre parcel of land located at
the southwest comer of the intersection of Owl Creek Road and Mandalay Road. The site is
approximately 2.5 miles west of Colorado State Highway 82 and 2.5 miles east of Snowmass
Village as shown on Figure 1. The site's southern boundary is bisected by Owl Creek which
flows to the northeast.
SUMMARY
Based on our field investigations and analyses, our findings are summarized below:
A . The existing spring and pipeline serving the property appears to provide an adequate
" potable water supply for a single - family residence on the property. Disinfection and
filtration treatment are recommended for the system.
. The geology consists of alluvial and glacial deposits with cobbly and silty loam soils.
There are no geologic hazards on the property or adjacent property that would
negatively impact the site from a hazard point of view. Figures 2 and 3 depict the
soils and geology on the property.
;t �)53
-° DENVER (303) 480 -1700 DURANGO (970) 259 -7411 BOULDER- 13031 473 -9500
I
Robert Sinclair
L Robert Trown & Associates
August 29, 1997
Page 2
w . There is approximately 0.5 acres of regulatory wetlands on the property. They are
located along and east of the Owl Creek channel as shown on Figure 4.
• The 100 -year floodplain is shown on Figure 5 and is contained within the banks of
Owl Creek on the property. However, backwater from the Owl Creek Road culvert
(partially filled with sediment and rocks) inundates a portion of the northeast corner
of the site.
1. BACKGROUND
Water Supply
�. Water Ouantity
The existing single - family residence has been served since the 1940's by a spring and pipeline
delivering potable water for domestic (includes lawn and garden irrigation) and stock watering
uses. The Bernard Stapleton Spring No. 1 is decreed in Case No. W1517 and is located
approximately 2,000 feet southeast of the house as shown on Figure 1.
The spring collection system consists of a solid collection pipe, wood - covered collection box
with overflow pipe and 2 -inch steel delivery pipeline. After crossing Owl Creek, the pipeline
transitions to a l'h -inch PVC pipe to the house.
At the time of WWE's field visit, the spring flow was measured at approximately 20 gallons per
- minute (gpm). This included 11 gpm at an outside hose bib and 9 gpm overflow from the box.
Interviews with Bill Stapleton indicate that the spring flow is relatively constant throughout the
seasons and from year to year. According to Mr. Stapleton, the spring flow was more than
adequate in hydrologic dry years.
r
Water Ouality
A water sample was obtained from the Stapleton parcel on August 11, 1997 and tested at a
certified laboratory to assess the water quality. Prior to sampling, the hose bib on the west side
of the Stapleton residence was turned on for approximately 35 minutes. The estimated rate of
flow was approximately 11 gpm. At the time of sampling, the water was slightly discolored and
contained floating particles inferred to be organic matter. There was no noticeable odor at the
time of sampling. The water samples were packed in a cooler and shipped overnight under
proper chain -of- custody to Grand Junction Laboratories in Grand Junction, Colorado. The
results of the water quality analysis are included in the attached Table 1.
u0 5
L'J
W
Robert Sinclair
Robert Trown & Associates
August 29, 1997
Page 3
y Overall, the water quality is generally good with no metal or nitrate contamination. However,
.. as shown on Table 1, there was measurable discoloration, turbidity, and hardness. Coliform
levels exceed the Colorado Department of Health and Environment (CDPHE) suggested limits
for drinking water
~ The hardness value does not indicate a health hazard, but is high enough to lead to mineral
buildup in the hot water heater, pipes, and faucets as well as require the use of large amounts
of soap for cleaning purposes. A blended softening process to reduce hardness to around 100
mg /l could be installed to address this problem. The hardness also results in the relatively high
w concentration of dissolved solids.
Despite lacking a noticeable odor at the time of sampling, the turbidity, coliform, and color
values indicate a likelihood of some biological contamination. The absence of measurable iron
and low manganese values would indicate the color and turbidity are biological in nature.
Biological contamination might be due to bacteria buildup inside the pipeline or organic
influences present at the spring box. Chlorine disinfection is typically the most effective
treatment for biological contamination. In addition, filtration is likely also needed to remove
biological matter from the water.
In summary, we believe the existing potable supply is adequate for future improvements,
including a large single - family residence. At that time, we recommend upgrading the existing
system.
" Geologic Hazards
Soils
_ According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture "Soil Survey of Aspen - Gypsum Area,
Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties," soils on the property consist mainly
of Fluvaquents (0 -10% slopes). These soils are deep, poorly drained soils found on floodplains
and alluvial valley floors. The USDA Soil Survey identifies these soils as generally being poorly
suited for homesite development due to a seasonally high water table. The Soil Survey identifies
Jerry- Millerlake loams (6 -25 % slopes) along the western portion of the property. This soil unit
is deep and well drained and typically found along alluvial fans and valley side slopes. These
cobbly loams have moderate permeability and moderate available water capacity. Runoff is
rapid and the hazard of water erosion is severe. Development limitations listed in the Soil
Survey include restricted permeability, large stones, and shrink -swell potential. A third soil unit
identified is the Kilgore silt loam which is located along the eastern property boundary across
Owl Creek. The Kilgore is a deep, poorly drained soil with moderate to slow permeability and
UUUJbu
Robert Sinclair
Robert Trown & Associates
August 29, 1997
Page 4
low available water capacity. If this unit is over - grazed or worked during periods of saturation,
y. compaction of the surface layer will occur as well as causing excessive runoff. The Soil Survey
indicates that the limitations to development on this soil include seepage, frost action potential,
and flooding. An efficient drainage system would be a necessity. The locations of these soil
units on the property are depicted in Figure 2.
Geolo
Based on the 1972 USGS Geological Map of the Highland Peak Quadrangle, geology at the
property consists primarily of unconsolidated Quaternary deposits including alluvium containing
sand, silt, gravel and peaty material, and older, poorly sorted glacial moraine deposits ranging
from silt to boulders. The alluvial and glacial deposits are generally stable but can be subject
to high water table or flood hazards depending on proximity to a water source. Bedrock
outcrops in the vicinity of the property include members of the Cretaceous -age Mancos Shale.
An inferred fault line is shown traversing the adjacent property to the southwest of the Stapleton
-� parcel. The geological map does not identify any landslide deposits either on or adjacent to the
Stapleton parcel. WWE did not note any slumping or sloughing of material on the property at
the time of the field visit.
In summary, there are no geologic hazards, including debris flow, slopes greater than 30
percent, unstable slopes, and avalanche or rock fall on the property or adjacent property that
would impact the site. Site specific soils analyses should be conducted to identify any site
specific design issues.
Wetlands
�. WWE wetland scientist Blair Leisure conducted a field investigation of wetlands on August 18,
1997. The property boundaries were located and an assessment was made of the overall
r presence of regulatory wetlands on the property following the criteria in the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual.
y The property contains an approximate 0.5 acre shrub wetland with pockets of herbaceous
wetland plants along Owl Creek. Owl Creek runs along the eastern section of the property, and
the wetlands lay adjacent to and east of the creek. The wetlands extend to the eastern property
®, line that parallels Mandalay Road as shown on Figure 4. The wetland extends west of Owl
Creek in the northwestern corner of the property.
There are several upland pockets in the southeastern section of the wetlands along Owl Creek.
The entire wetland area was flagged and follows the flagging diagram included on Figure 4.
Gi;t
J 6 1
Robert Sinclair
Robert Trown & Associates
August 29, 1997
Page 5
i� No other wetlands were found to occur within the property boundaries.
« Riparian areas on the property are located adjacent to Owl Creek. Due to the steep western
bank, the abrupt change to upland vegetation, and the lack of shrubs and trees on the west bank,
the riparian area includes Owl Creek and areas east of Owl Creek to Mandalay Road. Similar
to the wetland boundary, the riparian area extends 10 to 20 feet west of Owl Creek in the
northeastern comer of the property.
Floodplain
Hydrologic Design Parameters
This study uses the 100 -year peak streamflow for determining the floodplain limits. The peak
flow rate was estimated using three separate methods as presented below.
A. A statistical analysis was performed using 13 years of gage data available from a
gage located downstream of the project site on Owl Creek. The tributary drainage
« area to the gage is 6.6 square miles. For the project site, the tributary drainage
area is 2.7 square miles (see Figure 6). Thus, the flow determined using the
stream gage data was adjusted using the ratio of areas. Based on this analysis, the
estimated 100 -year peak flow rates is 65 cubic feet per second (cfs).
B. An empirical formula developed by the Colorado Water Conservation Board
(Technical Manual No. 1, 1976) was used to estimate the 100 -year flood event.
The equation uses tributary basin area and mean annual precipitation. Based on
this analysis, the estimated 100 -year peak flow rate is 73 cfs.
_ C. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formally the Soil Conservation
Service) CN Method was used as a final "check" for determining the 100 -year
storm event. These calculations indicate that the peak flow is also 73 cfs.
Therefore, based on this analysis, the 100 -year flood used to delineate the
floodplain is approximately 70 cfs.
Hydraulic Analysis
In general, the Owl Creek channel is a steep - gradient stream, well vegetated on the banks with
in -situ streambed cobble ranging between 3 inches and 12 inches in diameter. Owl Creek flows
south to north across the Stapleton parcel and, at the northeast corner, crosses under Owl Creek
:,
'uJ62
iT
TM Robert Sinclair
' Robert Trown & Associates
August 29, 1997
Page 6
Road via a 48 -inch diameter culvert. There is evidence of head cutting in the channel
immediately upstream of the culvert.
i� Prior to performing a hydraulic analysis, a field visit was conducted. Five cross - sections were
surveyed, including a section at Owl Creek Road, for use as input to the hydraulic model. The
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' HEC -RAS model was used.
The floodplain delineation begin at the culvert under Owl Creek Road and extends upstream for
approximately 500 feet. At the culvert, there is an obstruction blocking the outlet. In
particular, there is riprap at the outlet which extends above the culvert invert for two (2) feet.
The unobstructed culvert diameter is 48 inches (4 feet).
i.. Twenty feet upstream of Owl Creek Road is a diversion to an irrigation ditch. For the purpose
of the hydraulic analysis, it was assumed that the headgate is closed or clogged during the 100 -
year event.
The results of the floodplain analysis are attached. The 100 -year flood event is delineated on
Figure 5 and based on existing flow conditions at the culvert. In general, the 100 -year flood
event is contained within the banks of Owl Creek. The depth of flow is typically three feet with
velocities less than 6 feet per second. The existing blockage at the Owl Creek Road culvert
results in overtopping of the roadway and backwater flooding in the northeast comer of the
property.
Please call if you have any questions or need additional information.
MJE /dlf
971- 123.000
Attachments
UJI J63
Very truly yours,
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC.
I
1
1
1
I
I
11
1
1
1
1
;i.- r , I •
X I -a6-
IIN
a":
ti
J
r ft
- XV0,
POP, -
14
, '74
r ft
ti
Fmi
K! nu
APPROXIMATE
PROPERTY BOUNDARY -
• :I
and
t''�
�v
QMdd '. 7
.. o
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC.
818 Colorado Avenue I DRAWN RLV
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 CHECK WE
0066 (970)945 -7755 SCALE 1"= 2000'
DATE AUGUST 1997
Qrnc
mr:mi
N!14 .\
�joid '
n
Qal Ili
Kmu,
pa
Kmi
Kdb
luviunl G.
O�uuiaffian.d
eposits
moIlu�Oldervialiartep
FIGURE 3
ROBBINS
Stapleton Parcel
Geologic Map - Highland Peak Quad
IIw e ■�
EDGE OF
MIN
N ie .i li e. —5' WI tNE 5
CDR MEN
ry I�
/ / • / � -�` g'' / _ _ \— — 9O \\ � 1 I \ i \ I I \ I I I I — I \
B\ S
GA.ED ❑ PWP
FIOWO W ANN GRAVEL � DRIVE HOUSE 0 \
\
4
WOOD vENTS- I — — - _ _ _ — — _ — —
C CC \ FRAME
\
\
_ "RAGE
ee v' — —
►111 �111111.��i1��
111 � � j � 11111111111111
• �.1� 1111111111111111111,
,11� X111111111111111111
1 11 u 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� 1
,♦1111 /11111111111
►111��111111111
1111/ /11111111
111111
1 /1/1111111111,
,�1!s111111
11111. , C �! X100 i1 i1 i� \
11AT�)111111
1.1.x111111111.
1,11.1111111111.
1 14
1h11�11111111111.
1111111111111111111111111111111 .�� iL
11111111111111111114
Di1��i1�1�101111111111111111111111111E'
11�, � � 1 � 1 � 1 � 1111111111111111111! � 1.1
1111 x,111111111111111111111111, �
.11 11111111IV,
1� 1111 l, 111111111111111111111,
11 11, 1111111111111111111111, .
.0 11.111111111111
11!:11111111111111
0�'i10110i100001100+1110 10 1 1 1� 1
:b1:1i1:1`1�i1ii� m
1B
SCALE
3-.w5 45 W
15 io As eo
CONTOUP. 147ERVAL n 1 F001
q
a
� or
k0
o�
mi
q w�
LEGEND
19.1�1�
17:1
WETLANDS
Numbered Wetland
Flagging
III
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. DRAWN BL FIGURE 4
818 Colorado Avenue CHECK WE
SCALE I " = 50' ROBBINS - STAPLETON PARCEL
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 WETLAND DELINEATION
(970)945 -7755 DATE August 1997
- - - -I�� AREA
. 0165 ACRES •/_ �\ \ \\
\\ //
42
SET T 9. 0.
\ \I \
STEEL N I RE /
— — _ I
--
- - - -_— —
'
\
5
\ II
►111 �111111.��i1��
111 � � j � 11111111111111
• �.1� 1111111111111111111,
,11� X111111111111111111
1 11 u 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� 1
,♦1111 /11111111111
►111��111111111
1111/ /11111111
111111
1 /1/1111111111,
,�1!s111111
11111. , C �! X100 i1 i1 i� \
11AT�)111111
1.1.x111111111.
1,11.1111111111.
1 14
1h11�11111111111.
1111111111111111111111111111111 .�� iL
11111111111111111114
Di1��i1�1�101111111111111111111111111E'
11�, � � 1 � 1 � 1 � 1111111111111111111! � 1.1
1111 x,111111111111111111111111, �
.11 11111111IV,
1� 1111 l, 111111111111111111111,
11 11, 1111111111111111111111, .
.0 11.111111111111
11!:11111111111111
0�'i10110i100001100+1110 10 1 1 1� 1
:b1:1i1:1`1�i1ii� m
1B
SCALE
3-.w5 45 W
15 io As eo
CONTOUP. 147ERVAL n 1 F001
q
a
� or
k0
o�
mi
q w�
LEGEND
19.1�1�
17:1
WETLANDS
Numbered Wetland
Flagging
III
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. DRAWN BL FIGURE 4
818 Colorado Avenue CHECK WE
SCALE I " = 50' ROBBINS - STAPLETON PARCEL
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 WETLAND DELINEATION
(970)945 -7755 DATE August 1997
_I
0
0
C:
0
rn
W
Pon
S4. roi 1.o
�,
OWL CREEK ROAD — — — — _
1.211.3
tlUUn [[Y twat JO
`0 EDGE OT ROADYwI
_ e 69']5'55'
166 g, 5 89.51 U'E— �A9 8A_ _ " "• ��� ` 85
PW ' 1 •
p,IEp cen �� S pRIVE \ \ I � NW SE
/ �rMap8 90 NE 'ANn ' RtED
l) \ \TANK
- - \ / \ \ � \• I
PENIS / e06D 1 j I I ` — 8T
Coo FN.YE I I I \ 8•
— / OAKAB
NWSE L'
100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN
3 EXISTING CONDITIONS _
\ ik 90 \ ' /
- - -I —' AREA - A 0165 ACRES •1—
og
SET T 9 OR / I I I _ I\ \ 90
STEEL NIKE
/ _ I
Ir
0
94
` \\ ` \/ / `\
o •� \ /
- I ° 96
/ <'
\ /
r
�I IC
•
1 / I
/
m6 „ ' 30 °
CONTOUK INTERVAL IS 1 TOOT
_7755
,• T
1
�I
100
4.0
� 2.0
~ o
3.0 ^
y u
a
ma
o�
m=
q w�
East Floodpiam Line
shown schematically
(Actual delineation requires DRAWN plat
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. CHECK PMe
818 Colorado Avenue SCALE 111=501
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 DATE August 1997
/o7nt4dR
FIGURE 5
ROBBINS - STAPLETON PARCEL
FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION
,Yr Vry •—
I\
\ /
r
�I IC
•
1 / I
/
m6 „ ' 30 °
CONTOUK INTERVAL IS 1 TOOT
_7755
,• T
1
�I
100
4.0
� 2.0
~ o
3.0 ^
y u
a
ma
o�
m=
q w�
East Floodpiam Line
shown schematically
(Actual delineation requires DRAWN plat
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. CHECK PMe
818 Colorado Avenue SCALE 111=501
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 DATE August 1997
/o7nt4dR
FIGURE 5
ROBBINS - STAPLETON PARCEL
FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION
,Yr Vry •—
r
r
w
.r
r
s
q.
TABLE 1
WATER QUALITY RESULTS
JOB NAME KUt31iI1\1S YKOPEK I Y
JOB NUMBER: 971 - 123.000
JOB DESCRIPTION: Water quality sampling - @ WEST HOSE BIB FROM HOUSE
PARAMETER
UNITS
CDPHE (1991) I SPRING @ HOSE
Suggested Limits 1 8111/97
Arsenic
mg/L
0.05 i 0
Barium
mg /L
1 0.05
Cadmium
mg /L
0.01 0
�
Chromium
mg/L
0.05 0
Fluoride
mg/L
4 0.1
_
Lead
mg /L
0.05 0.003
Mercury
mg /L
0.002 0
Nitrate
mg /L
10 0.31
Selenium
mg /L
0.01 0
Silver
mgA-
005 0
no official limit 0.2
Color
Co /Pt units
pH
no official limit 7.13
Conductivity @25 deg C
_
umhos/cm
no official limit 577
Sodium
mg/L
20 6.1
_
Calcium
mg /L
_
no official limit 105
Magnesium
mg/L
125 12
Potassium
mg/L
no official limit 1.3
Chloride
mg/L
250
16
Sulfate
mg /L
250
44
Phenol Alkalinity
mg/L
no official limit 0
Total Alkalinity
mg/L
no official limit 245
Bicarbonate (HCO3)
mg /L
no official limit 296
Carbonate (CaCO3)
mg /L
no official limit 0
Dissolved Solids
mg/L
500 402
Hardness (CaCO3)
mg/_L
200 310
Turbidity
NTU
1
6.8
Boron
mg /L
no official limit_ 0.32
1 0.003
Copper
mg/L
Iron
mg /L
_
0.3 0
Manganese
mg /L
0.05 0.004
no official limit 0
Molybdenum
mg/L
Ammonia
mg /L
no official limit 0.19 _
Phosphate
mg/L
no official limit 0
Zinc
mg/L
5 0.003
Coliform (total)
co /omes1100ml
< 1 col /100ml 6
IjIft 070
WWE 8/20/97
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS BY GRAND JUNCTION LABORATORIES
m
m
I
m
I
m
wfi j71
i
FLOODPLAIN
ANALYSIS
1.
F
r-
0
m
a�
III
OWL CREEK Plan: Plan 01 8/21/97
OWL CREEK
105
�I
100-
95-
m
21
80 I�/iz�i,3
�b
I
75
0 100 200 300 400 500
Main Channel Distance (ft)
00GJ72
EG 1
WS
■
Invert
a
r
N
0
OWL CREEK Plan: Plan 01 8/21/97
OWL CREEK ROAD
.35 .08 4 .35
85-
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
I■
84_I
83-
82-
/1
81-
\
DE�%Ty D� Oc,�S'Tk'dCT /G,cl ' � I
80,I' nc.TGLT \
79- 1 '
1 � I
78
0 5 10 15 20 25
��J73
Station (ft)
EG 1
WS1
Ground
•
Bank Sta
mc
s
W
OWL CREEK Plan: Plan 01 8/21/97
@ GREEN FENCE
.35 — .08 "1 3
85 5 ■
EG 1
1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
WS1
■
Ground
i
Bank Sta
i
1
83 i
cc
I
I
w 82, I
�I I
81
80
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (ft)
w
OWL CREEK Plan: Plan 01 8/21/97
@ SPLIT
.35 .08 3
85 _ 5
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1
84 �
83--11
F
c
0
m
a�
w
Viii L) 7
82-11
1
E:1
a
80-
0
EG 1
WS1
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
10 20 30 40 50
Station (ft)
w
OWL CREEK Plan: Plan 01 8/21/97
@ SPLIT W/ DIVERSION
.35 .08 3
85.O,I 5 T
1 �
1
J i
84.5
� I
i
84.0
c 83.5
0
m
m
W
59"s
82.5
ti
J 7 6
10 20 30 40 50
Station (ft)
EG 1
WS1
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Jv
N
c
0
m
a'>
w
OWL CREEK Plan: Plan 01 8/21/97
SECTION 2
—.08¢ 0',
95, 8
94
�I
a
93-,
92
1
1
91 1,
90
89
tit;U77
35
i
EG 1
WS
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
20 40 60 80 100
Station (ft)
w
c
0
m
a�
w
OWL CREEK Plan: Plan 01 8/21/97
SECTION 3
98� 0 0,
8 8
97
1■
II
961
I
�I
95
7
1 I
94
1 ,
93-
92
uu�UJ7J
91
35
i
Station (ft)
EG 1
WS 1
Ground
Bank Sta
?0
■.
w
UiJt;J7`�
OWL CREEK Plan: Plan 01 8121/97
SECTION 4
0 - .08 '` .35
105—
8
■
EG 1
�i
WS 1
Ground
104
/
•
Bank Sta I
1I
■
103-
�I
i
�
lI
0
102 —I
m
I
>
ai
1
w
101 �
•
I
I
,I
100
I •
f ,\
99
0
20 40 60 80
100
Station (ft)
UiJt;J7`�
FI
I
I
1
1
1
7
V
1
1
HEGRAS Plan: Plan 01 Reach: OWLCREEK SM197
River$ -
4.0 -
"
101.06
100.65
-
OA1
5.831
0.061
0.611
hannel
69.101
-;Q Right -
0.29
Top. Width
18.97
3A
93.641
93.44
0.20
3.331
0.011
23.211
42.87
3.93'
23.49
2.0 _
90.301
89.97
0.33
1.22
0.08
20.98
47.97
1.05:
29.97
1.3 -: -
-84-761-
84.65
0.05
0.00
0.00
4.17
65.06
0.77
40.67
1.2 ..
84.69
84.65
0.04
0.02
0.001
4.02
64.66
1.321
40.69
1.1 --
84.67
84.63
0.04
0.021
0.001
3.82
64.911
1.271
40.67
84.651
84.601
0.051
0.001
0.00.
- 17.501
49.051
2.55,
27.00
1 000080
I
I
MEC.RAS Ph91:P8m01 Reech:OWLCREEK 8121197
RII,
�, --
70.001
99.401
100.651
1W.661 101.06
G.Slope::
lam) j-
0.0997521
raLChO1 -;:
5.181
,Flo Amik I
.. (eq
14.18
WWM Fwud9#Chl
18.971 1.00
3
70.001
91.10
93.44
83.84
0.0177351
404
2751
23.49-
0.49
1
70.001
70.00
88.22
82.00
89.97
84.85
89.97
90.30
84.70
0.0508481
0. 0 B 51
5.30
I.Ml
19.56
59.18
29.97
40.67
0.78
0.20
1
70.001
80.591
84.85
84.89
0.001342
1.87
72.55
40.88
0.16
-
70.00
80.34
84.631
84.87
84.65'
0.0012821
0.0010841
1.85
2.04
72.70
97.671
40.671
27.00,
0.15
0.15
t
70.001 78.501 84.80
80.47
1
1
1
1
1
000081
Plan: Plan 01 Reach: OWL CREEK Riv Sta: 4.0 Profile: 1 8121197
W.S Elev (tt : 100.65
Elemen
Vel Head (ft) °_ 0.41
Wt. n -Va 0.080 0.080 0.350
E.G. Elev .. (ft) . 101.06
'Reach 166.00 166.00 166.00
E.G. Slope (_ s 0.099752
Flow A ° 0.26
13.35
0.55
Q Total (cfs) 70.00
Flow (cf_, 0.61
69.10
0.29
Top Width (ft). 18.97
Top -Widt '. 0.75
16.00
2.22
(ftls): 4.94
Avg, Vel. (ft/d 2.36
Flow A
Ift
8.19
Dpth'( 1.25
Hydr. Depth'( 0.35
0.83
0.25
LVelTotal
(ft).
100.65
Wetted Per.: (f 1.02
16.10
2.28
I.
Tap Wi
221.6
Conv (fs) ., 1.9
218.8
0.9
Plan: Plan 01 Reach: OWL CREEK Riv Sta: 3.0 Profile: 1 8121197
Plant Plan 01 Reach: OWL CREEK Riv Sta: 2.0 Profile: 1 8121197
W.S. Elev (it
89.97
Ele
h_ annel -
Right OB
Vel Head ft
0.33
Wt.
0.080
0.080
0.350
E.G. Ele '
90.30
Reach
165.00
165.001
165.00
E.G. Slope,,
0.050649
Flow A
Ift
8.19
9.04
2.35
Q Total (cfs)
70.00
Flow (c
20.98
47.97
1.05
Top Wid
29.97
Tap Wi
17.02
6.001
6.95
Vel Total.
3.58
Avg. Vel. (ff1s
2.56
5.30
0.45
Max Chi Dptii
1.75
Hydr. Depth (ft) ";"
0.48
1.51
0.34
Crit W.S. (ft) _.
89.97
Wetted Per. (ft)
17.051
6.32
7.32
Conv. Total (cfs)
311.0
Conv. (cfs)°
93.21
213.11
4.7
1 000082
Plan: Plan 01 Reach: OWL CREEK Riv Sta: 1.3 Profile: 1 8121197
W.S. Elev (ft) 84.65
I
Element]'�-- n
Wt. n-Val.- 0.350 0.080
Right 013
Vel Head (ft) 0.05
0.350
E.G. Elev (ft) 84.70
Reach Len
Reach Len.,( 1.00
1.00�
1.00
E.G. Slope (ft/ft) 0.002835
Q Total (cfs) T-70.00
Flow Area 21.25
Flow
ow
Fl (cfs),----' 4.17
34.391
6
3.53
0.7
77
t
Top Width,(ft)' 40.67
Vel Total,(tt1sj 1.113�Avq.
T p
,oi� Width (ft 25.00
Avi _ Vel (fil
vel. (fuss, 0.20
;
13.00
2.6
67
1.89
0 .22
0
Max Chi DpM, 2.65
Crit W.S. (ft)
jHydr. Depth 0.85
Hydr. r_ Depth, I
t
Wetted Per.'
Wetted t
(cfs) 7i4
13.00
1221.9
1 32
111 3.76
14.4
Conv. Total (cfs) 1314.7lConv,
Plan: Plan 01 Reach: OWL CREEK Riv Sta: 1.2 Profile: 1 8121197
W.S. Elev (ft)
84.65
Ele Left- -
0.350
Reach Len. 14.00
0.0801 0.350
Vel Head (ft) -- -----
E.G. Elev
84.69
14.001
14.00
E.G. Slope (Nft)
-0-._001342
Flow Area (sq 26.85
38.671
7.04
Q Total (cfs)
70.00
Flow (cfs) _f 4.02
64.661
1.32
Top Width
40.69
jft)ii
Top Width (ft 27.00
10.00
3.69
Vel Total (ft1s),
0.96
Avg. Vel. (ft/ 0.15
Hydr. Depth 0.99
1.67
0.19
Max Chi Dpth (ft)
4.06
3.87
1.91
Ifir-ims. (ft), -
-Max
Crit W.S. (ft)
Wetted Pen (ft) 28.46
j
10.03
5.31
Conv..T Ral
cfs)
1911.0
109.8
1765.21
36.
Plan: Plan 01 Reach: OWL CREEK Riv Sta: 1.1 Profile: 1 8121197
W.S. Elev (ft).:.
84.63
Eleme IA O
MI. n-V,- 0.350
hannel Right 08
0.080 0.350
Val Head
0.04
ff.-G-. Elev (ft)
84.67
Reach n, ft)
Len." ft 20.00
L
20.00
20.00
E.G. Slope (ftfft)
0.001282
Flow Area 26.37
_ �s' -
39.36
6.97
Q Total (cfs Y.
70.00
Film (cfs)
3.82
64.91
1.27
Top Width (ft),
40.67
Top Width' 27.00
Avg,,Yel. (]U,w 0.141
10.001
1.65
3.67
0.18
Vel,Total (ft1s)'
0.96
Chi Dpth (ft)
4.29
Hydr. Depth (ftim 0.981
3.94
1.90
-Max
Crit W.S. (ft)
Wetted!' s ft
28.391
10.08
5.28
Total (cfs)
1954.7
CM
105.61
1812.5
3=6
000083
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Plan: Plan 01 Reach: OWL CREEK Riv Sta: 1.0 Profile: 1 8121197
W.WE16V (ft) 84.60
Val Head (ft)' 0.05
Er-I
0.350
--- el Right 0
0.080 0.350
E.G. Elev (ft), 84,65
E.G, Slo 0.001084
Q Total 70.00
112—MM
Flo 9qft)jq 60.27
Flow ,(Cfs) 17.50
24.411
49.851
12.99
2.65
Top WidtWW( 27.00
Top Width (ft) 19.00
4.001
4.00
Val Total (ftIs 0.72
Max I Dp 6.10�Hydr.
jAvg. Val. (ft1s) 0.29
Depth (ft) 3.17
2.041
0.20
6.10
3.25
Crit
Conv. To 2126.11
20.1
Co 6
1513.9
80.5
1 000084
%J 0113 - CL-�tpen/Pitkin Community
n y ' JDevelopment Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970)920 -5090
City Land Use Application Fees:
00113-63850-041 Deposit
-63860-043 HPC
-63885 -268
-63875-046
-MROI l
100011 -67100 -383
15000- 63050480
15000- 63065-482
Public Right -of -Way
Zoning & Sign Permit
Use Tax
Park Dedication
AH Commercial
AH Residential
County Land Use Application Fees:
00113 -63800-033 Deposit��
-63820-037 Zoning
-63825-038 Board of Adjustment
Referral Fees:
00113 -63810-035
County Engineer
__�� - --
00115 -63340 -163
City Engineer
- - --
62023 -63340 -190
00125 -63340-205
Housing
Environmental Health
--
- --
00113-63815-036
County County Clerk
00113-63812-212
WildliteOfficer
—
Sales:
00113 -63830-039 County Code - - - --
- 69000 -145 Copy Fees - - - --
Other
— Total_` /[/-
Name: Y Date: Check:
AAA Pte, Project: -
Case No: .-
Phone: No. of Copies
000085
� . . I,
VICINi-ry MAP
EGAL DESCR I PT I ON
A TRACT OF LANO BEING PART OF 1.01' 9 10 13 AND 14 AND THE WEST
1/2 OF THE SE, 1/4, IN SIECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH: RANGE 85 WEST
OF T14E 6th P.M., MORE FUI-LY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH FENCE OF Ol CREEK ROAD FROM
iFHcH TUE.' FAST 1/4 CORNER OF .SECTION 4 HEAR$ N 89001'11'E 2,634,6c) FEET;
THENCE $09458'25^E 72 40 FEET-
THENCE S07015-51-W 154 - 00 VEEJ;
2 ,
THENCE $11011'35"W 1S/ 65 F El
THENCE N89059*55"W 349 75 FEEJ�
THENCE NOI'32'35'E 455:7) FEET'TO THE SOUTH FENCE OF SAID OWL, CREEK ROAD;
THENCE S89057*47"' 166.98 FEET AL.ONG THE SOUTH FENCE OF OWE. CREEK ROAD;
THENCE SFE9435'55`E 189.88 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH FENCE OF OWL. CREEK ROAD;
THENCE N76021'41'E 3'/.16 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH FENCE OF OWL CREEK ROAD
I'D THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
COUNTY OF PITKIN
STATE OF COLORADO
L E G E N D & N 0T"E S
0 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR WITH CAP AS DESCRIBED
0 SET $PIKE SURVEY CONTROL
-EF- WOOD FENCE'. LINE.'
WIRE FENCE. LINE
T I TI.,E COMMITMENT: SIEWARI" TITLE OF ASPEN
ORDER NO. 00023642
DATED: MARCH 24, 1997
POSFED ADDRESS `2298"
ELEVATION DATUM IS ARBITRARY BASED ON T.S.M.
SET STEEL. SPIKE AS SHOWN, CONTOUR INTERVAE IS
1 FOOT
0 SET 129 PROPERTY CORNER NO. 4 REBAR WITH RED CAP
100 FLOOD PLAIN
f-ROM WRIGHT WATER ENGINEER'S INC.
Erl WETLANDS REPORT DATED ADC. 291 1997
A(,T,ORDINO TO COLORADO LAW YOU MOST COMMENCE-' ANY LEOAL ACTION
PASEO UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT' WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER You
FIRST 01SCOVEREO SUM DEFECT. IN No EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION i
UPON ANY ill IN THIS PEXJ' BE CnMMi MORE THAN TEN YUAN$
FROM ll DATE OF THE CER'ErIFIC41`11061 SHOWN HEREON.
� 11-4 .4," 1, 'C
S"U-) 7 - , . NT-4, R A, N , � 11
mm
(1". RISTW
1041 REVIEW MAP AND CONCEPTLML SUBMISSION
1� "
m
20* TELEPHONE EASLEMEIN"If
BOOK 229 PAGE 58
STREET
F ROADWAY
,) k,
.... .... 2634.66'
13 WITNESS
too - ORNE4
00
S
7 c EASI'1/4 CORNER
m"w S ET, T 10 N 4 FTrT (1
G -.Jullg BIEL-
........ . . . . . . . . . . .
r
7'
(3RA wir PUMP
Pfi TANK 1101101 HOUSE
✓ 12,
86A I E
Ell
34 w. 2
6 4 50' ME 'TRACK WHEIL"'I'll(")
vt ..... .
igll
0 Wool)
0
FRAME
HOUSE GAIi
RlSo 9
S&PfiC MOOPM 11) 3404 0 MT04CK
N
Nw
"ZI: Ir
SEPTOC FIELD
SCALE
L 'AIMA-- -4 7,0+651 ACRES J ) '� \v `/' .'' .'» y
INCH - 30 FEET
I, oil< 00
N11 Ile
z� — f. ;wwv
9
, 30 45 60
SET T M
CONTOUR IN'FERVAE IS I FOOT
let)
lima'' EEL I lax,
Is
Q Aft A Ot
4000 Ana . . . . T DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN
95 J :x
4c, APPROVAI-
Z THIS 1041 REVEFW MAP WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PITKIN
TY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT'S "HEARING OFFICER',
J!, COUNTY COMMIl �tl,
Iqq
%
AY OF
�X
WNW, 11 61611 CER
-%ff "Hall
1kmv:a::;A- vmoreAeA
N,N4111,1 01 �0 pokwpowtvinJ
/00 1041 HAZARD WAIVER
IN,
COUNTY OF THE EXISTENCE OF "1041 HAZARD AREAS' THKr MIGHT AFFECT
APPLICANT ACKNOWI.EDGES THAT IfE/SHE HAS BEEN INFORMED BY PITT
F HE
-Y
THE PROPERTY AND ANY IMPROVEMENTS, AND USE AND OCCUPANC
THEREOF.
t
a. no
( 4,
Oz.
1.
A
,,,w.� +,�„�r.�„�...ww"�'.,ax�' �, �b�y" Nml^ . m»' mlu 'V; °11';a,�in�noiia'f.'.,,,� / ° ` � � A •per• „r•r »�/� �x� �'� � � ""�. ' 1 + i � i + � ' , ' � � � 1 ' . ' ; i , . , r ' , V � „,... pall
a,640i
. . . . . . . . . . . . a �,. 1 DAVID W.v "R� � RI I3TFR p" ND }aU 'CA�'pe DO 14EREBY CEc fil I tre-0000 FE Y SHOWN ME NrTHAT THE SAME
AR r THE PLATTED $ 1 AND ROADS . . T EBOUNDARY ROAD$ AND OTHER
R� 41 HAZARD REVIEW S I ONT,
M F BOUNDARY
. . . . . co
I I I P I A I- N OTE S
17 iAN(4)*111%=FICIAL. SEAL TI-113
IN AVE. UP,
DAY 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . .'1'
ALL. STRUCTURES SHAIJ, BE GENERALLY LOCATED AS SHOWN
.............. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ON THIS SITE PLAN. STRUCTURES IN OTHER LOCATIONS SLI&•
REOUIRE FURTHER REVIEW BY THE HEARING OFFICER.
EA(
Ilp I CAL
.... . . . . . . .
0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WATER PIPEL.INE EASEMENT TO SPRING
L,OCATED NOS*37*05"W 753.85 FROM
WC TO 91/4 CDR SECTION 4
THE EXACT LOCATION OF THIS PIPEI.INE
AND EASEMENT ARE NOT SPECIFIED
SEE BOOK 229 AT PAGE 466
CLERK & RECORDER ACC1'--r,-rANC1,,','
THIS MAP WAS ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN OFFICE E
1.4-up
AN!O,%IECORDER OF PIT �tl,,COUNTY Oft,�T hDAY
109 IN PLAT BOOK AT PAGE RECEPTION NUMB - 'R
CT 4 RECO R
PREPARED BY
ASPEN SURVI"Y ENGINEERS, INC,.
210 $. GALENA STREET
P.O. Box 2506
ASPEN, COLO. $1611
PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816
job no. 25236A NOV. 30, 1998
00�/