Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.packet.04092014.ATT Cellulur ServiceMEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners Regular Meeting — April 9t', 2014 THRU: Cindy Ho�mmum - Development Director FROM: Mike Kraemer, Planner p4< RE: AT &T/Ives Special Review for a Cellular Telephone Facility SUMMARY: The Applicant is requesting a Special Review approval to expand an existing cellular telephone facility. The proposal would add an additional 27' stealth (tree camouflage) cell tower to the site and a 185 square foot building to contain equipment for the tower. OWNER: Ray Ives APPLICANT: AT &T REPRESENTATIVE: Tom Alexander, consultant for AT &T LOCATION /ZONING/LOT SIZE: 2147 Lower River Road/AR- 10/-14 acres 2011 AERIALPHOTOGRAPHY: 000001 '1 13 Page l of & REFERRAL COMMENTS: The application was referred to the Aspen hire Protection District and the Woody Creek Caucus. No comments were received from Aspen hire Protection District. The Woody Creek Planning Commission responded and had no objection to the application. PRIOR APPROVALS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS: The subject property contains a single family residence and an accessory outbuilding that were built sometime in the 1970's. In 2000, T- Mobile was granted approval to construct a 25' tall, free standing tower that holds four (4) antennae and equipment shed approximately 300' north of the Ives residence. Both the tower and equipment shed are brown and can been seen in the picture below. In 2006, T- Mobile gained BOCC approval to extend use of the cell tower facility indefinitely. Additionally in 2006, the subject property was granted approval for an additional 28' free standing mono- pole cell tower camouflaged as a conifer tree, for the Sprint/Nextel Company. This pole is visible in the picture below and is identified as the large conifer tree to the right of the brown equipment shed. Lequipment o existing cell towers and associated shed - looking south e r River Road. 02.12.20 1 B:03 The subject property is located adjacent to sensitive big game ranges to the north. Both previous cell tower resolutions granted approval of the facilities with specific conditions regarding limitations on the dates of construction in effort to not disturb important late season winter ranges. If an approval would be granted for the subject request, these conditions would be carried forward in a resolution. Page 2 of 8 SPECIFIC PROPOSAL: The Applicant is desirous of gaining Special Review approval to construct a third tower on the property. The tower is stated to be a maximum of 27" in height and will be camouflaged as a conifer tree, similar to the existing tower in the picture on the previous page. An additional equipment shed of approximately 185 square feet is also proposed. The proposed tower and equipment shed would be located just north of the existing facility. The Applicant states that this location is strategic, and an upgrade of the facility through a third tower will provide improved cellular coverage in this area of the Roaring Fork Valley. STAFF COMMENTS: SPECIAL REVIEW CRITERIA: Section 2- 30 -30(h): A telecommunication facility is considered a Special Review Use within the AR -10 zone district and is subject to the compliance with the following criteria: A. The special review use shall be consistent with the applicable Countv Master Plan. Response: The subject property is located within the Woody Creek Caucus and is subject to the Woody Creek Master Plan. The Master Plan does not make mention of cell towers specifically. Additionally, statements and policies in the Plan would not prohibit a cell tower proposal. B. The special review use shall not conflict with any applicable sections of the Pitkin County Land Use Code, including the County Land Use Policies in Chapter 1. Response: The proposed development is consistent with applicable Sections of the Code. Sec. 1 -60 -360 of the Code relates to Telecommunications. It states: The County encourages adequate, minimal impact regional and community telecommunications facilities to serve the needs ofgovernments, emergency services, businesses, and citizens ofPitkin County. 1. Where a telecommunications system utilizes a network of facilities, a comprehensive approach should be taken for evaluating potential sites in Pitkin County with a view to minimizing the number of sites required and any adverse impact. 2. When feasible and not otherwise detrimental, multiple telecommunications facilities should be consolidated onto common towers, and /or located adjacent to, on or incorporated into existing or proposed buildings or other structures. The proposal to construct an additional pole reduces impacts associated with a new location, while providing continuation of an already in place network. Offsite impacts at this location will be minimal. C. The proposed development must not materially endanger the public health, safety or welfare. Response: Staff has no information that would indicate that the development materially endangers the public health, safety or welfare. The proposed continuation and expansion of the facility is intended to serve the public health, safety and welfare by utilizing existing communications facilities and services. D. The proposed development must not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abuttingproperry. Response: Staff has no information that would indicate that the development would injure the value of adjacent properties Page 3 of 8 UJO003 E. The special review use shall be consistent with the intent of the zone district in which it is proposed to be located. Response: The stated intent of the AR -10 Zone District in Chapter 3 of the Land Use Code does not make mention of the use of cell towers. Regardless, the facility is a one -step Special Review to the BOCC which has the discretion to approve, approve with conditions, or deny this request. F. The special review use shall be compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or shall enhance the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The character of the immediate vicinity is primarily rural residential development. The proposed expansion of this use is consistent with this area. The cell facility will not generate onsite employees. G. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed special review use must be in harmony with the surrounding area and minimize adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, traffic generation, parking, trash, service delivery, air /water pollution or other impacts on natural resources, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties. Response: The current tower has minimal visual impacts on the surrounding environment. The existing facility is discernable from Hwy 82 or Lower River Road, designated scenic corridors, but does not negatively impact the scenic quality of the area. The additional tower will have the same effect. The proposal will not adversely affect pedestrian or vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations, and odors on the parcel or surrounding properties. H. There must be adequate public facilities and services to serve the special review use, including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools. Response: The location currently provides adequate services to support the use. SPECIAL REVIEW USE: Section 2- 40_20(C) Special Review Use Limitations under the Pitkin County Land Use Code include: A. Commencement of Operation: Approved special uses shall begin within three (3) years following the date of approval of the development permit, unless a longer period is specified, or the approval shall become null and void. B. Special Review Use: The decision making body may approve a special review use subject to a limited time period during which a use may operate. C. Submission of Annual Report and Review of Annual Reports: The decision making body may require any person operating pursuant to a special review use to submit a statement to the Community Development Director attesting to the continued conformance of the use to the conditions of the approval. If after reviewing the statement, inspecting the site and considering any other relevant materials, the Community Development Director determines that the use is in conformance with the provisions of the Special Review Use approval, the use may continue pursuant to the provisions of approval. If the Community Development Director determines that the use is not in conformance with the provisions of the Special Review Use approval, the Community Development Director may Page 4 of 8 00J004 recommend to the original review authority that it consider the withdrawal of such approval. Failure of any person operating a use under a Special Review Use approval to submit such a statement within the period specified above shall be considered a violation of the provisions of the special review approval and may be sufficient cause,for withdrawal of the approval D. Approval Withdrawal Procedure: The decision- making body shall consider and act on approval withdrawal after a public hearing. Notice of the public hearing shall be mailed to the applicant and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the County not later than thirty (30) days prior to the hearing. The notice shall state the time, location and subject matter of the hearing. E. Approval Expiration: Any Special Review Use shall expire after any continuous twelve (12) month period of non -use. Any unfislftlled obligations of the approval shall continue to be binding after expiration of the approval. Response: The Applicant shall abide by all limitations of the Land Use Code. USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR A CELLULAR TELEPHONE FACILITY: Section 4-30- 42(gh the following standards shall be reviewed for compliance: (1) Principal Use of the Land A cellular telephone facility is a principal use of land, but may be located on a legally created lot or parcel without the need to include any additional acreage for the second principal use. Staff Response: Staff acknowledges that this is a principal use of land and that other principal uses may be located on the subject property (2) Building - Mounted Antennae and Towers Building- mounted antennae and towers are an accessory use of the land permitted pursuant to Sec. 4-10 - 10(e). Staff Response: There are no building mounted antennas proposed with this application, only an additional free standing tower and equipment shed is proposed at this time. (3) Freestanding Towers A non - stealth, freestanding tower shall not be located within two hundred (200) feet of an existing urban /suburban residential district. Freestanding non - stealth telecommunication towers located more than two hundred (2 00) feet from an urban /suburban residential, commercial, or special purpose zone district nury be permitted through special review. The maximtnn permitted height for freestanding towers is forty (40) feet. Staff Response: The existing facility and proposed tower and shed will comply with the 200' setback from a residence. The tower is proposed to be 27', in height and is well below the maximum 40' height limit. (4) Co- Location Required Each new tower shall be designed to accommodate one (1) additional riser's equipment. Page 5 of 8 °�� 05 Staff Response: The Applicant states that they will design for co- location. (5) Setbacks All towers, both concealed and not concealed, shall be set back front all existing dwellings and other urban /suburban zone districts property by a minimum of two hundred (200) feet, or at least two (2) times the height of the proposed tower, whichever is greater. All towers, both stealth and non - stealth, in a business, commercial, or special purpose zone district shall be set back a distance equal to the height of the proposed tower from the property boundary or rights -of- way, whichever would require the larger setback. Staff Response: The proposed tower is 27' making the 200' setback more restrictive. As stated earlier, the proposed facility will comply with required setbacks. (6) General Development Standards (a) Design and Neighborhood Compatibility (I) The exterior appearance of all towers and associated support structures and buildings shall be compatible with other buildings and /or the natural environment in the surrounding area. Staff Response: The proposed tower will be camouflaged as a conifer tree that will be visually compatible with the surrounding area. (2) The Board may require the applicant to apply to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for compliance with FAA standards for a dual lighting system rather than a red and white marking pattern, when the Board determines such a markingpattern would cause aesthetic blight due to the visibility of the tower. Staff Response: No specific FAA standards apply to this height and location. (3) Support buildings located in any residential district may not be used as an employment center for any worker. This provision does not prohibit the periodic maintenance or periodic monitoring of equipment and instruments. Staff Response: The Applicant understands this condition. (4) No advertising sign or logo shall be permitted on any telecommunications facility. Staff Response: The Applicant understands this and there is no advertising at this location. (5) The decision- making body may require any other conditions to mitigate the impact of the tower on adjacent properties and uses. Staff Response: The Applicant understands this condition. (b) Buffering and Screening (1) All fences and walls shall be screened with landscaping meeting the requirements of Sec. 7-20 - 130(d)(2)(a). OUL006 Page 6of8 Staff Response: There are no fences or walls associated with this tower. The Applicant has shown a site plan that incorporates landscaping screening in the form of pine trees that will aid in screening the development. (2) The Board may require all antenna(ae) be appropriately screened to safeguard surrounding property provided that such screening will not interfere with the transmission and /or reception capabilities of any antennae located on the tower. Staff Response: The branches from the camouflaged conifer will screen the antennae. Additional screening of the antennae is at the BOCC's discretion. (3) Output power levels from the tower and/or all associated antennae shall not exceed the current federally approved levels for the tower as a whole for exposure to electromagnetic radiation. Staff Response: The Applicant understands this condition. (4) Radio, television, or other electromagnetic transmission(s) or reception on other properties shall not be disturbed or diminished. Staff Response: The Applicant has provided a letter in the submittal that states compliance with this standard. (7) Existing Towers New antennae may be co- located upon towers that exist on the 5th of July, 2006 without the need to obtain a separate special review approval. Staff Response: The Applicant has stated that co- location could occur on this existing tower. (8) Outside Experts and Disputes (a) Siting of telecommunications facilities may involve complex technical issues that require review and input by outside experts. Staff may require the applicant to pay the reasonable costs of a third party technical study of a proposed facility. Selection of expert(s) to review the proposal shall be at the sole discretion of the decision - making body. Staff Response: The Applicant is aware of this standard. (b) If an applicant for a telecommunications facility claims that one or more standards of this section are inconsistent with federal law as applied to a particular property, or Kould prohibit the effective provision of wireless communications within the relevant market area, the decision- making body may require that the application be reviewed by a qualified engineer for a determination of the accuracy of such claims. Any costs shall be charged to the applicant. Response: The Applicant is aware of this standard. 00 JJ07 Page 7of8 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the BOCC approve the AT &T/Ives Special Review for a Cellular Telephone Facility subject to the conditions in the attached Resolution. ATTACHMENTS: A. None. 00,0008 Page 8of8 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PI TKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, GRANTING APPROVAL FOR THE AT&TITVES SPECIAL REVIEW FOR A CELLULAR TELEPHONE FACILITY BOCC Resolution No. -2014 RECITALS 1. AT &T/Ray Ives ( "Applicants ") have applied to the BOCC for Special Review approval to expand an existing cellular telephone facility. The expansion includes construction of a 27' cell tower camouflaged as a conifer tree and a 185 square foot equipment shed. 2. The property is located at 2147 Lower River Road and is legally described as Lot 8 -A, Aspen River Valley Ranch. The property is approximately 14 acres and is located within the AR -10 zone district. 3. The BOCC heard this application at a duly noticed public hearing on April 9"', 2014, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to this application. 4. The BOCC finds that the additional tower and equipment shed is appropriate and does not have any substantial visual impacts on the surrounding area. 5. The BOCC finds that the proposal is consistent with the applicable master plan and the Special Review Criteria in Land Use Code Sections 2- 30- 30(h), 240- 20(a -c), and 4- 30- 50(c). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners that it hereby grants approval to the AT &T/Ives Special Review for Cellular Telephone Facility subject to the following conditions, which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: I. The Applicants shall adhere to all material representations made in the application and public meetings. 2. The property shall continue to comply with all conditions of BOCC Resolution No's. 206 -2000, 146- 2006, and 147 -2006, as amended. 3. The Applicants shall submit for review of a Building Permit. At Building Permit submittal, the Applicant shall also submit proof of all necessary FCC permits /licenses for the upgraded equipment. 4. The cellular facility shall comply with the Pitkin County Noise Code. 5. Due to sensitive big game ranges, no construction of the approved improvements shall occur from December I't to March 31". Additionally, no access to the site shall be allowed during this timeframe, except for emergency purposes. 6. The Applicants, owner and/or operator of the cellular facility shall maintain current at all times, complete contact and site information to be kept by the Community Development Director. This information shall include, but is not limited to the following: 0000®? Resolution No. -2014 Page 2 a. Identity, including name, address and telephone number including official identification numbers and FCC certification, and if different from the owner, the identity and contact information of the person or entity responsible for operating the facility. b. Name, address and telephone number of a local contact person for emergencies. c. This contact information shall also be posted on the door of the equipment room within 60 days of this approval. The tower shall be painted dark green, be camouflaged as a conifer tree, and shall look substantially similar to the representation made in the hearing and as viewed in Attachment A. The new equipment shed shall be of a color that matches the existing equipment shed. The tower is limited to 27' in total height. 9. All equipment associated with the cellular facility shall be removed when the cellular use ceases. 10. There shall be no exterior lighting associated with the tower or equipment shed. VU0010 Resolution No. -2014 Page 3 NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES WEEKLY ON THE 9`h DAY OF JANUARY 2014. APPROVED ON THE 9th DAY OF APRIL 2014. ATTEST: Jeanette Jones, Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John Ely, County Attorney Case #P107 -13 PID#: 246725300021 000011 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOERS, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Robert A. Ittner, Jr., Chair Date: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: i znd Houben, . Community Development Director CZ) C) CD 0 N uiprs'Frv^c pTII M 26, Mll A' 19 F.]xErA+. � 8263Aeinmw4'OYG -z Mp C x i N m r m A O z C 7! 6! fnm -p v N AAA2 Alq��p ; 4t� ., AH if Moil I� NO �g o ., N m 0 z A 41f .4 sr-W r -o- ua opwc FOLWA 22. —q. T.O. MrtENWS k MONOPOLE [CUIPAF.�R prat C -a� AJ N C W x m m N W m I m C 7 O z ;t� - It tt 9 mF z t' &r+ p cs C -a� AJ N C W x m m N W m I m C 7 O z ;t� - It tt 9 mF z t' &r+ CJ V• M+-- ��� M.12043Ae,�ei1TM��pgp�caWw/ 87 # •— ••RIGs 1.Wy PLOTT® iMx 76, 1014 FT tb 77vn m z r Y m cn m r � a s s -- t ;Q��gob8� X82. ig! �O��O �en � w � X WOO r s mm pp p Yn SY I'1 5 6 yg ✓ r: r � w. to 8 r r r S r a� /fir sf� /r s r r /r rs r r / r r r r FEL1 M �Z rn "o �v ogB PN mm v z o 5 4 1 r r , AY Y r� 111 Svc 8 • s fl�ii a�} ST, Y4� ,r,4 —. I § t 9 E t t 4 f� a ks o��liR mi z & 7 H op 0 °z �a o n �„ x0 M • r a� ,�- • ;Q��gob8� X82. ig! �O��O �en � w � X WOO r s mm pp p Yn SY I'1 5 6 yg ✓ r: r � w. to 8 r r r S r a� /fir sf� /r s r r /r rs r r / r r r r FEL1 M �Z rn "o �v ogB PN mm v z o 5 4 1 r r , AY Y r� 111 Svc 8 • s fl�ii a�} ST, Y4� ,r,4 —. I § t 9 E t t 4 f� a ks o��liR mi z & 7 H °z slot $ s M Terra TecTonics, Corp. Contractor for The New Cingular Wireless d /b /a AT &T Wireless PO Box 774782 Steamboat Springs, Co 80477 Michael Kramer Pitkin County VIA FED EX RE: 2147 Lower River Road PID# 246725300021 Dear Mr. Kramer Letter of Intent Summa for Cellular Facility: On behalf of The New Cingular Wireless d /b /a AT &T Wireless, this letter of intent for a Special Review is being submitted for a new installation of a 45' stealth monopine telecommunications facility located at 2147 Lower River Road, Snowmass, Colorado. The proposed location is in a AR -10 zoning district and meets all setback requirements. Additionally, this location is an existing telecommunications site which currently has on site a T- Mobile telecommunications facility and a Sprint /Nextel stealth monopine telecommunications facility. The proposed stealth facility will hold the antennas and the associated equipment shelter will be on the ground in a 12'x16' shelter painted to match the surrounding foliage. Additionally, even though the telecommunications site is no visible from Lower River Road or Highway 82, we will also be landscaping foliage that will additionally hide the equipment structure. AT &T has explored other location in the area, however, none are available within the required search ring and would not be compatible from an engineering and technical nature for their existing and future facilities in Pitkin County. AT &T selected this site to work with the existing and proposed locations that will meet the RF requirement and design of other facilities within the AT &T network and Pitkin County. This location is necessary component of AT &T's overall communication network and is integrated into a coordinated communication service that will provide improved coverage though the Lower River Road area and Highway 82. This installation will increase and enhance service for the citizens and visitors of Pitkin County as well as emergency services along Highway 82. This site will also allow for enhanced E -911 coverage. In an attempt to enhance services, and to comply with our FCC mandate, we first looked at Co- locating on either one of the existing towers on this property. The T- Mobile Site is not structurally built to carry another tenant, and the Sprint Nextel Site is both not tali enough for us to co- locate on, but also, due to the underlying lease agreement with the Land owner and Sprint Nextel, it is not allowed. 0 00001 4 Section 2 -30 -30 One Step Review Criteria: Due to the fact this is an existing /approved telecommunications site located in Pitkin County, this project qualifies for the One step review criteria. Section 2 -40 -20 a -c: We agree with all provisions I Section 4 -30 -40 This project agrees or qualifies with all provisions The attached package includes the following: Check made payable to Pitkin County Treasurer in the amount of $2,014.00 - Summary Letter (letter of intent) - A &E Drawings of project - Photo Simulations (scenic view protection exhibits) - Map of location - Deed (proof of ownership) - Written consent of land owner to process zoning - List of property and mineral owners within 300' - Executed Agreement for payment of land use application fees - Copy of pre application summery form Regards, Thomas J. Alexander Representitive for New Cingular Wireless dba AT &T Wireless 970 - 879 -8718 000002 PITKIN COUNTY PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY LOCATION: 2147 Lower River Road, Lot 8 -A Aspen River Valley Ranch PID #: 246725300021 ZONE: AR -10 OWNER: Ray and Sandy Ives REPRESENTATIVE: Tom Alexander PHONE & EMAIL: 970 - 879 -8718; alextaCcbcom cast. net DATE: September 10, 2013 PLANNER: Mike Kraemer 970 -920 -5482 Type of Application: Special Review for a Cellular Facility Description of Project/Development, The Applicant is requesting a Special Review approval to place an additional cell tower on a property that has an existing cell tower and ancillary facilities on the property. Land Use Code Sections to be addressed in letter of re uest a lication : Sec. 2- 30- 30(h): _ Special Review Criteria Sec. 2- 40- 20a -c: Special Review Use Sec. 4- 30- 40(g): Cellular Telephone Facility Staff will refer the application to the following agencies: Aspen Fire Protection District, Woody Creek Caucus. Review by: BOCC Public Hearing? Yes, at BOCC. The Applicant shall post a public notice sign on the property at least 15 days prior to the date specified for the Administrative Decision pursuant to Sec. 2- 20- 100(a)(3) of the Land Use Code. In addition, the Applicant shall mail notice (by first class mail) to all adjacent property owners and mineral estate owners within 300' of all property lines with the return address of the Community Development Department (form of notice to be obtained from the Community Development Department). The names and addresses shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County, as they appear no more than 60 days prior to the date of the public hearing. A property owner receiving the public notice shall have 2 weeks from the date the notice is postmarked to submit comments or objections to the Community Development Department FEES: Total $2,014 (Please make check payable to "Pitkin County Treasurer ") • Planning Office flat fee: $1,560 (non - refundable; based on 5 hours of staff time for review); if staff review time exceeds 6 hours, the Applicant will be charged for additional time above 5 hours at a rate of $312/hour) • Public Notice Fee: $54 Jr (I • BOCC Clerk Fee: $375 To apply, submit 7 copies (1 unbound) of the following information: 1. Summary letter explaining the request, providing background on prior approvals and permits, and addressing each of the provisions of the Pitkin County Land Use Code identified above in sufficient detail to demonstrate that all substantive review criteria have been met.[ ummarize existing conditions, current uses and proposed futures uses or expansions as described in_- ection 1.1 through 1.8 of the Pitkin County Land Use Application Manual; 2. 24" by 36" and 11" by 17" site plan as designated in Section 2.1.12 of the Pitkin County Land Use Application Manual; iements, standards report items and 3. Special Review Uses 2 submission bmis the PitkinrCounty Land Use Application Manual f notgalready addressed in 1 pursuant to Section 0 0 D"J00 and 2 above including maintenance visits, emergency contact provisions, and FCC compliance for Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) emission levels; 4. Scenic View Protection Exhibits as designated in Section 2.1.12 of the Pitkin County Land Use Application Manual; 5. Parcel description, including legal description and 8 -1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject property within Pitkin County; 6. Copies of all resolutions, ordinances and approvals including any recorded drawings for the parcel (as applicable); 7. Proof of ownership of subject property as designated in Section 1.3 of the Pitkin County Land Use Application Manual; 8. Consent from all owners to process application and authorizing the representative (1 copy); 9. List of all property and mineral estate owners within a 300' radius of the all property lines (1 copy); 10. Total fee for review of the application; 11. Executed Pitkin County Community Development Agreement for Payment of Land Use Application Fees Agreement (1 copy); 12. Copies of this Pre - application Conference Summary form NOTES: ➢ PLEASE SUBMIT TWO UNBOUND, SINGLE -SIDED COPIES OF YOUR COMPLETE APPLICATION WITH NO DOCUMENTS LARGER THAN 11 "X17" (PLEASE INCLUDE ONE SET OF LARGE MAPS FOR EACH COPY) ➢ PLEASE SUBMIT BOUND, TWO -SIDED COPIES OF ALL REMAINING APPLICATIONS WITH ONE SET OF LARGE MAPS FOR EACH COPY. ➢ THE PARCEL IDs SHOULD BE INCLUDED ON ALL DOCUMENTS INCLUDED IN YOUR APPLICATION. ➢ ALL MAPS SHALL BE FOLDED. ➢ The Land Use Code is available on -line at httpJ/ ww2. asp2Mitkin .com/Dgpartments/County Code/ ➢ The Land Use Application manual is available on -line at hit : / /ww2.as en itkin.comIPortaisloldocslcoun /Com %2ODevIPlannin /land use application manual. df ➢ Applicant will be responsible for mailed and posted notices. Public Notice requirements are described in Section 2- 20-100 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. A signed, notarized copy of the affidavit confirming notice must be received from Applicant prior to approval. ➢ This pre - application conference summary is advisory in nature and not binding on the County. The information provided in this summary is based on current zoning standards and staff's interpretations based upon representations of the applicant. Additional information may be required upon a complete review of the application. 000004 F­n1 J ad 97.263 ua QTt vrro A Er. FkkIR CAFTRLLJ Mecele nwtl Areutn prarca i1.M IR.rshO4Yx ktF VS+t, N A tiw linff M.Ii1FlVw MYng.gr r.P[eP"flnn 1wuN r-f11%1 Mehrea. LA 712E 1 Atm u1r,,,.nx[ianlrat EW F% -HE ne-vm - 4a20771:39516 5arv:I xxJ J OGaE[<cfx7 COLORADO 1401E EOUJTY 11ME OF CFIF04T DEED OF ThUST Fne%, ltrlrq LInE 01 (:retl.t - Sccw:nq Fntwd Ailwa tear -VA21 M InlNeft R4"t THIS R ® OF WS IS rWI 01 mw U-1622-- T +- y -•L,tc 4 ItAY T O�fi>rNIIJ13GIOt AlEE - Th. t ..... IS f l P .liw Truster ct f ^l Ltl! , °Trtlrb >'I Irin r •tF1fr . fcirxs lI T Ia LFrxrl eery b, GNYfE.LIWNI.RF._. -w 9wwk VGA -1. ►• _ nNO Ial Llalrin� 6E19: alK\ �^ LrE4 % =•1fiM qtn CM Cb L* MAWL m, NartFYQt:r na LCO N•MF.QJ.'+'d F`w 82m Mltll.wb. fL =*1 1. ttlr Dt:t aI TIV.t IN. wr t'trt; 'YVri 04'Y4 nL`Wl "I It K'TR^Ar,t' lRr rq rn' Y, 'us'Jllu 'trx' reW- Cn.# MInNMt.n Whom Usk Y -A Iu Ivry! EJMn7 �LSn lxtnn 'r Iq Iq.n tf ! W.M. bq ,M, .jhe of ,+,emit Alf.." l Er .i fkr falec I YI+ w k R. 11c -] of it LM .J� Lilefrrx.xl', +Va I,W 1r Wirt L-e 111 ­11— 19"W:ret if ,.N.rt IF. f011 r z_- n 'IJCIJJLIsI bkR I­ to Ln+C I n It l t r-ia.l mrl 9)V =Pat .l N1 n1Lrny Z' a1} 1M C rl Onglimnamt2lb"Wd rna [.t'TUI _6f11Nf i 1i/0 &2 2a_ +hr Ace"— v. a+iuel Lt+ a L 1t 0^ I. Iw! ineL• M: tt tw: •, a Lylmbb ra Im % Ikan rr 11JIIAJZ PD72 _ , . ru er 11A "RM C+»I •.r T-A c I.I UN jt •f. YAL.r•r III :Jr,S I- rr "s^Y.Mgr at +r ILYd Jrdr• 41� 'N'n.'If the Atrrrn r i IIJJLIra. ' 1"RO R Net •I WI, 4'a LT :Irt'f r'tnl i i]t:r .rl IN SS rrltcY+= )1 MI .I 1 rr 1pNS tT:2'rIM11 aq• x'11Fr A4 rtrt IL ti • I.. cxPd ­m 111♦rgnurJ Jnb:! LPa Ay.eTTrrl 11C nMw� ,rl,llo it trrd u ++ r rq:- rJ A [rJ.S st :N fv u.I.mR "r "dndcF ­9 •0 other Jm1L nlx 1+e b us r'c*ruI].r SId under ire -%.n ..xl 1. YVW,dn r „ 1 1 e l ­t ar ]cetar' 1F H -. iS..tNr `rt, rIH I RY.crCSL A 1 .n111'JSJ .1.1.11.. 1 LW Aarr/-n_ r[l f .T1Mir[Ir9r rx. glw•.f: erJtraMN wx.1 mac jmwh q Jr txr AQ•N n% 'It 1hw I.rtrrn•M W FI rnlx Iu rTf. wh Ite"cs xlvLrn,.. L-ace r'df nx.. Ll 4nu n [I'Jis. th.+ 14'JL .V , t.i E}aad ot reuse, .11 'yl do Nrrrorrb.rra .J glttl taYQ351, w., ertlrr Mnllr+ kIx 1'4er Tr Itte: erV Ihr rte ern .H N. rfM DrrFVJt and In --he e'nn or I1t tall 1 A S1C 1"P.t _i.fr 14.. err to, Ire••o_a aC L w a" YTL.ti1' r -1 l.rx -t .rR`L Ih •fYY[, ,r P• IroW1r a' :.N ^. w. I.r1N"Hf IKri/ IN _ MiillF✓,,, CUX•�. C6—F1, a..1 Iltl'rw tiny yprrl.J Jr Del I A. I-a— nTd xaLt a PY 1 mA. whCF vot. - v r rv� C rMLMh• Ir n.+.I rte; +`JET Sf3NER RnfFO. w. s11MYNIhts co ilsuam �„_ �� TOOL MEN TVrrH d 11 hhPro•emaraf , ,.. J. h. *ran" cNer.J „n -'* P'oPrrlr. fJ rl ..Fvm"`e`, rvNnlrq... M, LKI NTk[rw Ydvr Li 1.f0]rrr . rwr14 �' IY P -o JCM1Y- A "apI]ATKT, sM wk. Nn! ]rf11 I.r !v'r Jfveird 1>• r1: i}rd LI -r JST A. L'rr k~'* 'l '�11n- -[ R r1f 3­1 Ia T A P,.Ph1 r: I Z I ar A1� w +Nr a•^ 4 .acne P,• ., ..� ... -. 1330 i CL a Cj o O m v a m d w >n � r m C o z� n I z 0 z a y O Z c m ti D O x z 00 W �c C n V) cn ou0003 -i m a 0 C� n i—+ � O 0 � a n z 0 o - n ti ro f m a m � OD w >n i CO) tCr z n �r o0 m Q x cn A Cn ou0003 HARPER DONNA L ICEBERG TRUST WAGMAN CALLIE STARMAN 50% 1234 N STATE PKWY 4020 PALOS VERDES DR #206 9 BRANDING IRON LN CHICAGO, IL 60610 ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CA 90274 ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CA 90274 WAGMAN DAVID SIMON 50% 2416 VIA RAFAEL PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CA 90274- 2151 BLM PO BOX 1009 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 j2�� t USFS FOREST SUPERVISOR PO BOX 948 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF LAND USE APPLICATION FEES PITKIN COUNTY (hereinafter "COUNTY ") and W '"' ,W e r4" (hereinafter "APPLICANT ") AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for 5rfeE u 1113 n a P� lei CL'�w i- C- (hereinafter, the "PROJECT "). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Pitkin County Ordinance No. 30 -2009 establishes a fee structure for land use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. The fee structure is based on the COUNTY'S policy that development shall pay, in full, the cost of development review in the COUNTY. Fees have been set to be consistent and fair to the public and to reflect the expense incurred in providing such services to the public. 3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed PROJECT, it may not be possible at the time of application to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. 4. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that fees charged for the processing of land use applications shall accumulate if an application includes more than one type of land use review. 5. COUNTY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for COUNTY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to enable the Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 6. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the COUNTY'S waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay a base fee in the amount of $ which is based on — hours of staff time, and if actual time spent by staff to process the application exceeds the average number of hours by more than 20 %, then the COUNTY will bill the APPLICANT quarterly for the additional time spent. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. PITKIN COUNTY Cindy Houben Community Development Director 000010 ("APPLICANT") y• s. 1 Ir` a �-S Print Name and Title (i #applicable} Date: 11. 1 z'. It I Mailin Address: �6Lf 7,-;, Pitkin County Colorado Laind Use OwOartnWd ATTN-, Michael Xramer via KO EX Nuvember, 26, 2013 4E: 2147 LavftT 16VW $tQ*d, SnOw"M" Cut Oraft Eal �,. �►1 This cs audwnzAi a from the lard Ovjws of tine above m"bowd pamei to a0aw NOW O"t WIMess d1$/a/ AT&T O"Im to bed The coning pmcgw with Min County Coborado. Adclitionsh we authof Ue Pxmis A*Qmdrt to tom! out Zoning Pmonnowtadw on this 2P61cation. Rmmls, RaWwom iw DOW.— wisorra.+rw� xessm.m..er -+.aa rnorTEn wa. zs, 2a +3 AT � srrm `:) FgAAFa m 601 DO Q m x s_ Bill SMP x 91J C1 [ 3 �w o- IJI MK 0 0 m c� 0 O N O O M Z ka; m OD S L Y� I v 8 m T�"� Y Y$ a girt, sin r bm x g 'n o z N 4 z r ©_ m X rn M0 n Cy0 ��' Cgo z © Ma pry 'r- .. .rte �D m� r I" ' v "` 03 CO 3 CA Q a> r N ic M N 0 iA 0 m OD S L Y� I v 8 m T�"� Y Y$ a girt, sin r bm x g 'n o z n m n Q w m� Ayy m OD S L Y� I v 8 m T�"� Y Y$ a girt, sin r bm x g 'n o z r � I 1/. PEt TrfS1OENCE (E)PRNATE ORIVE - i 000013 1 -SITE 'PLAN (EIZ5NMA TRANZFCFVAER A METER pm, NEW u.4. PAYER 4 TEU:O M 72W AC 3&9 UT[aTY ROUTE TO FOLLOW IE1 ROOD TO Raw. aut PROJECT INFORMATION 91Eta\uE NNM. a2 N. SNOWMASS M. sneio- CIX142�! tf.x rar.> =++�+a rusAe v+o�f.rsa w nae. TERRATE.CTONICS Ism. Mf MGAYL yft'nx"K MewT'f mew "M A tNmFli PlA'AMr W aar•' •. r • T04P Wass SAMr' sTAEET. sure Sm unu10N. carw.fso maxr aeF.r mun SITE PLAN NCR R c : NEw a?xs {GUPM.NTq T4TBT Ea.IPMEM73HEJ.'rHtB E`TER EWRAIEfTT F. IF1361 1� 15511,IUNRPfNE f+E G.i, , ANDWTD EOUM'MENT \• r � I 1/. PEt TrfS1OENCE (E)PRNATE ORIVE - i 000013 1 -SITE 'PLAN (EIZ5NMA TRANZFCFVAER A METER pm, NEW u.4. PAYER 4 TEU:O M 72W AC 3&9 UT[aTY ROUTE TO FOLLOW IE1 ROOD TO Raw. aut PROJECT INFORMATION 91Eta\uE NNM. a2 N. SNOWMASS M. sneio- CIX142�! tf.x rar.> =++�+a rusAe v+o�f.rsa w nae. TERRATE.CTONICS Ism. Mf MGAYL yft'nx"K MewT'f mew "M A tNmFli PlA'AMr W aar•' •. r • T04P Wass SAMr' sTAEET. sure Sm unu10N. carw.fso maxr aeF.r mun SITE PLAN NCR R c : IR 1 1 - ENLARGED SITE PLAN nrs. s. vrr•ro ♦ �u \ Itl \ Ir at&t M WYF]>MEBD EN4E MFaf EMaIFVIlltla. CP n'IiiF P'ROJECT INFORMATION MTE N HWY. Si & N. SWMMASS RO. Wr . a COU42M }sav ioAEN HvEP.Il4Aa 6rrWlAlM8.G06IX1 TERRATECTQNICS ,e W OMTN AW uTTLETCM, as Mf,n ,cWnF we r+ Ar sv�w acxnlrava e� *. wre mo urn�ow. cx>,:rnAno Eden aESU�. �m.axFSns ENLARGED SITE PLAN 000015 >5 N {'E123T11.V- MONOPM. BY OTHER i9ETea ) IEl EW IPAIEWT SHELTER AND OUTDOOR FQUIPAENi 1 1 - SOUTHEAST ELEVATION {111 PROPOSEOATaT PANEL ANTENNAS PIPE MpINTEO ON NEW r51 RRH ANS SURGE _ MCIN w wy NEEME S PR07E-CTOR PER PAIWTED DARK GR€ENRIACN $ECTOR 1 ` - Ne-BMW DISH - IMlt ATATEOUIPMENT91ELTER 2f71.h f11MSTACN RETAP04GWALL r LIOMOPI i IHTE]IIA NO76: 1. PANNT MNTETNNAS 5t MOVWIINC IWADWARE MIe[ OREEN/M-4M- NEWAU�TTIIAN'1TyNES 2 PRQVbE I,E $ OYFT{ AiRET11KS TDR CAAIDIN.AGE 3. MDIgP11R' MAMIFACTtATE TO PItDNDE SPE[2TICATIONS d D12141TING5 1� APPRDHED 201INJC . C MAINTAIN 12' -0' CLEAR LINDER LOWEST BRW"- S- M.w. DISH W4 CENTER AND A21MIJrH T_ &D. aut ENQEwOOp. t"�m „: PROJECT INFORMATION ­E NAYS NWY. 82 d N. SNOVOAA M RD, SIIEI❑ COU4230 1,­OwER RRDW .,KMAIAK OO.ur� 7 ERRATECTONICS '� w OWTARA ALE LTTTLEPPR.co_21 yn.m"'Im A 1~1 Ltioii►! MW 1®5 THdAN63­l.'<' mJae U RLETtW. C4loH -� %Y �i � ELEVA"ON C'2 MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENTS