The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.eh.246327400011 (2000)Document Layout (From Most Recent to Oldest Permit) Permit Application Log Sheet/Notes & Photos Communications As -built Design Engineer Design Soil Information Water Permit & Information Second System on property Third System etc. Floor Plans Please See Building and Land Use Approvals Files for additional information. Permit # 00013 Type of permit New( x) Repair( ) Addition to House( ) Name of Owner Doreen Goldyn Street Address 710 N Bill Creek Rd Property legal description SW1/4 SE1/4 Sec 27 T85 R88W Size of lot 40 acres Total square footage of the house Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department Permit for an Individual Sewage Disposal System 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-5074 Parcel ID # 2463-274-00-011 Water source Private well # of bedrooms in house Caretaker unit detached # of bedrooms in caretaker unit Designed for what '# rooms (list) # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house Total square footage of the caretaker unit 750 square feet 1 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in caretaker unit 2 Permit information Designed by Church and Associates Mailing Address 4501 Wadsworth Blvd., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Perc rate 14 Profile hole depth 8 ft Depth to groundwater or bedrock Septic tank capacity 1250 gallon Absorption area 279 square feet Comments Unknown L Septic permit approved per compliance with the engineer design and specifications dated January 13, 2000. Any changes must be approved by this department and the design engineer prior to them being made. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the Pitkin County ISDS regulations. This department does not endorse any brand of products. The engineer must do a final inspection of the installation and submit an as -built letter to this department. This department must also be called for an inspection with a minimum of 48 hours advanced notice. System design calls for a 1250 gallon two compartment tank with a pump in the biotube vault in the second compartment. Distribution box must have a baffle. Two lines running into two trenches, each having 1 row of 9 chambers. Trenches must have a minimum of 6 feet of undisturbed soil between them. A setback of at least 50 feet to the irrigation ditch must be maintained from the absorption field. The area where the absorption field is installed should not be used as a horse corral. This area should remain free of traffic of any kind. 10111101 Permit approved b /C�m 1 lT( �i� Date: �_�> 31 I s n and specifications of the proposed individual sewage disposal system have been revieJ�hnfteedohsiWred Plans p p p 9 satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -built drawings must Lbe included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Installer: ��ll I IR 6,V iVI 0lit 11 9 '% i �q 000001 �� •/ Date: Final inspection approval: �'3 '7 3. E TUE 11:57 AM ASPEN/PITKIN ENV HEALTH FAX:970 920 5074f PACE 3 ASPEfN►.. SKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPA , ,AENT APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 130 S. Galena St., Aspen Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970-920-5074 -k - nn Name of OWNER _Dore, e. v\ Cr o I d y yn Owner's Mailing Address f3 a X ) 1 a ) IB n A, w, } C- O 1 8s-.ne5s 03 1 Home Phone: 511p 9 - Primary Contact Person (all communication regarding this permit will go through this person) -dame d Comoany o r -y Cortaet Mailing Address (3 1 C.- 0 ) (o Business Phone : Cell Phone: Fax: — 3 Parcec ID # (available from assessor's office at 920-5160 or at www.aspon.com/assessort) Street address of property -1 q -4,3--�L1Z.�(-- o d -a-.) sw� 5 Legal Description: Lot Block Filing H Sec DM T85 Size of lot: 1- p acres. Type of proposed structure: F r ckyft Size of oldg. envelope: S Total square feet of house_ x of offices. lofts & similar sized rooms in house # of bedrooms in house N I f9 Caretaker Unit: Attached ( ) Detached( X ) Total area(sq. ft.) of caretaker unit 1� s 0 9 of `zpdrnnms in rnretaker unit f # of offices. lofts and similar size rooms of coretaker unit O 1 Permit is for: New Home ( X ) Repair due to failure ( ) Remodel/Addition ( ) Emergency use ( ) Water. Private well ()<) Spring ( ) Stream ( ) Community/Public Water System ( ) If community system: Name of system r^e fee for a ISDS application is $330 for a permit that takes 6 hours or less for the department to approve. If approval -takes longer than 6 hours, a rate of $55 per hour will be charged. The maximum fee is $1000. The basic fee of S330 is due at the time of application. The remainder, if any, will be due in two stages: first, at the time of issuance of the ISDS permit: second, before finai approval of the ISDS permit. Application for an individual sewage disposal systf -, is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accur 3 information on locations of all existing and proposed wells. contour intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes, waterlines, springs, suction or irrigation lines, drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, floodplains, dry gulches. and existing septic systems. I hereby certify teat any such features not shown on attached site map are not present. Issuance of the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may be undertaken until all approvals and permits have been obtained. The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department. Pitkin County and employees of these agencies will be held harmless should the Individual sewage disposal system fail or ction. The permit to construct is issued on information submitted by the applicant or hislher representatives. The Dwn ssum s full responsibility in case of failure of the system. Signature of applicant Date / 7 c) v Received by Receipt # o l Date p C� G:\ehkisds\isdsapp.doc 000002 CHURCH & Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS December 21, 2001 Todd Haberman PO Box 1210 Basalt Colorado, 81621 GOI&AJ6 Subject: Installation Observation, Proposed Habemfw Residence 710 Bill Creek Road Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 11948W Mr. Haberman, RECEIVE® DEC 2 7 2001 PITKIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH As requested, we observed the installation of the onsite wastewater system (OWS) for the subject site on December 12, 2001. The system was designed under our Job No. 11948W, dated April 25, 2000. The system includes the installation of one 1250 -gallon, two-compartment, precast concrete septic tank with a pump in a BiotubeTM pump vault in the second compartment. Two gravelless chamber trenches were installed, each with one row of nine chambers, as indicated on Figure 1. A concrete distribution box was used to distribute effluent to the beds. An as -built drawing is included as Figure 1. The pump and BiotubO'm vault were in place at the time of our site visit. The OWS construction foreman, Tony with Haberman Construction, may activate pumping system at his discretion. The components of the OWS were installed in conformance with our plans and specifications. If there are questions or if we may be of further service, please call. Sincerely, CH Ed` EOC/trp 2 copies sent copy to APEHD, Attn: Madelyn DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 LOVELAND 970.663.2124 WESTERN SLOPE 970.948.5803 O W O U II V) co ODM c co i�0 tV Q ZCC <a0 cr W W� oCf)0 O r Y H �cna t° a U.W Q z z ro 3w 0 .Ja 3IL IL O n. z0 • w �. z W C> Z_ 0 CLt w cry o W L L >_jco <�z W Q � LU o Q �Z-fir J Q U Q a a a w LU JAZ= Z >� Z F= W LIJ LU Z � Z Ir OJ - Q O!— LuwC)o dnLLI -i-LU w0z S �-zU�� C?CL LUF0 > cOQZz= ��nowZn �LYEL'QU NY Z (\j< WOE OU�o Z�o�w of-ucLo LIJ X CL CL Z U 0 CL CO cV CL j o o zo� Q / w O / -IL U Q o V)W (DCL zo D J J m Z w Z � Q 13K J w L 0 z co O 000005 a F' z �U U r' m� z W O 0 LU — W LL Of w �. z W C> Z_ 0 CLt w cry o W L L >_jco <�z W Q � LU o Q �Z-fir J Q U Q a a a w LU JAZ= Z >� Z F= W LIJ LU Z � Z Ir OJ - Q O!— LuwC)o dnLLI -i-LU w0z S �-zU�� C?CL LUF0 > cOQZz= ��nowZn �LYEL'QU NY Z (\j< WOE OU�o Z�o�w of-ucLo LIJ X CL CL Z U 0 CL CO cV CL j o o zo� Q / w O / -IL U Q o V)W (DCL zo D J J m Z w Z � Q 13K J w L 0 z co O 000005 Apr 25 00 02:28p CH'iRCH & Assocaties 303-463-9321 p•2 CHURCH & Associates,lnc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS April 25, 2000 Todd Haberman PO Box 1210 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Subject: Clarification of Existing Corral, Proposed Haberman Residence 710 Bill Creek Road Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 11948 Dear Mr. Haberman, As requested, by the Aspen Pitkin Environmental Health Department (APEHD), we must clarify the use of the existing corral, as indicated on Figure 1, of our original design, dated January 13, 2000. It is our understanding livestock will not be confined in the existing corral. It is to be used as a drain field with small native plants and grass beds. If there are questions or if we can be of further service, please call. Sincerely, CHURCH & AssociatesI l p R$� :r' a Edward O. Church, P. ' EOC/trp 1 copies sent fax copy to APEHD, Attn: Carla, 970-920-5074 000006 DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, Co 80033 CASTLE ROCK 303.660,4358 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 ASPEN/PITKIN EIRRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPAPd-MENT ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS Owner's Name -,17A>#MAf y�� ORYN, Parcel ID # ,57,0' 'YiNSp.�f � YK House Size (sq. (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 75 Number of Bedroo sin Main H V W, Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House "kti� Ferri; Q Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow 300 State Review Required? no Perc Rate 2 !,!5 Design Flow (Q) = # potential bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 525 Absorption Area (A= Q/5 X SQRT) A = 393 sq. ft. of absorption area required 25 infiltrator units without reduction A maArnuwn 30% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system, only if the lot size and soil conditions are optimal. If a reduction is being, proposed, describe why lot size and soil conditions are optimal: GOOD SOIL CONDITIONS, DOSING TRENCHES A = 275 sq.ft with reduction 18 infiltrator units with reduction Type of system: []Absorption trenches GAbsorption bed [x] Gravelless chambers []Dry well []Seepage Pit flOther Minimum tank capacity 656 gallons' SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 100 SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet = 50 SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = 25 FINAL INSPECTION BY: 000007 DATE: Engineer's Submittal for Septic Permit in Pitkin County Owner's Last Name: HABERMAN Location: 710 BILL CREEK ROAD Summary of information regarding new septic system: Type of system being proposed: SEPTIC TANK AND GRAVELLESS CHAMBERS Other treatment processes being used: NONE Does the system use any mechanical parts? (Prohibited unless there is no alternative)YES If yes, explain why there are no alternatives A PUMP IS REQUIRED DUE TO ELEVATION DIFFERENCE FROM SEPTIC TANKS TO DRAIN FIELD Does the system require any maintenance other than routine pumping? YES If yes, who will do the maintenance? CLEAN FILTER WHEN SEPTIC TANK IS PUMPED Are any reductions being proposed? YES If yes, what makes the lot and soil conditions optimal? GOOD SOIL CONDITIONS AND DOSING TRENCHES Which of the following are on the site or within setbacks? Closest distance of septic system to each feature 100 year floodplain NLA H well(s) >100 FEET [] irrigation ditches >50 FEET [] streams >50 FEET [] ponds NLA [] other features NLA What was the profile hole depth? N/A What is the depth to groundwater? N/A What is the depth to bedrock? NLA What assumptions, if any, were made in system sizing and design? (Include any local, site- specific data, such as months without snow cover, ratio of evaporation to absorption, etc. that are relevant.) If there are any variations from normal design, please explain how they can be demonstrated to improve treatment and protect water quality. NONE 000003 CHURCH & Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS January 13, 2000 Todd Haberman PO Box 1210 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Subject: OWS Design, Proposed Haberman Residence 7'10 Bill Creek Road Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 11948 Dear Mr. I laberman, As requested, we have reviewed the subsurface conditions reported by HP Geotech for the subject site and prepared an onsite wastewater system (OWS) design for the proposed residence. The subsurface investigation was performed on October 18, 1999. SITE CONDITIONS The property is located in a rural residential area in Pitkin County where OWS are required. There are several existing buildings located on the property with a two-bedroom residence proposed as indicated on Figure 1. The Crystal River flows south to north along the western portion of the property and there is a seasonal irrigation ditch flowing through the center part of the property from south to north. The proposed drain field area is relatively flat, and has thin cover of native grasses. The proposed residence will be located topographically lower than the drain field. There are two existing wells located 500+ feet from the proposed drain field. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION A two-bedroom residence with an area less than 2000 square feet (SF) is proposed as presented on Figure 1. We have sized the OWS based on 2 bedrooms and 300 Gallons Per Day (GPD) using Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department (APEHD) loading of 75 gallons per day per person. The design sewage loading with a peaking factor of 1.75 is 525 GPD. This loading includes washing machines and garbage grinders. The drain field is to be a minimum of 100 feet to all wells and 50 feet from the irrigation ditch. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS HP Geotech performed a subsurface investigation by digging 3 percolation holes, 50 to 62 inches deep, and one profile pit at the locations indicated on Figure 1. Subsurface conditions in Profile 1 consisted of 1.5 feet of topsoil, underlain by silty sand to 4.5 feet, underlain to the maximum depth explored of 8 feet by silty sandy gravel with scattered cobbles. Percolation tests indicate percolation rates of 12 to 17 minutes per inch (MPI). The average percolation rate is 14 W1. Percolation data is presented in Appendix A. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend the installation of a septic tank, a pump, and two chamber -type trenches installed at the locations presented on Figure 1. The OWS design is based on a design sewage load of 525 GPD and a percolation rate of 14 MPI. The installation requires one 1250 -gallon two-compartment precast concrete DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 303.463.9317 0 00009 Fax: 303.463.9321 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 OWS Design Job No. 11948 Page 2 septic tank with a pump in a Biotube vault in the second compartment, as indicated on Figure 3. Total flow rate of 25 Gallons Per Minute (GPM) and a Total Dynamic Head of 46.5 feet is needed for the pump. Pump details are present on Figure 4. We recommend the installation of two trenches, each with 1 row of 9 chambers with 4" PVC perforated pipe place on the surface of the ground. A distribution box is required to distribute effluent to the fields. Vehicle movement over the drain field area during construction should be kept at a minimum to prevent compaction of the receiving soils. We recommend the bottom of the bed be scarified with a pick, shovel, or backhoe bucket teeth prior to the addition of chambers. The surface of the field should be seeded after installation using a native seed mix available at seed stores. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed over the field. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE The owner must realize an OWS is different from public sewer service. The owner must be aware of and assume responsibility for maintenance of the system. In the absence of a monitoring program, we recommend the septic tank be pumped every two years. Effluent filter and screened vaults, as applicable, are to be cleaned during pumping. There are daily considerations such as not putting plastic or other nonbiodegradable materials into the septic system. Garbage disposal use should be minimized. The backwash of a water softener may be harmful to the OWS. A separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash waste, if a softener is installed. Chemically treated water from a swimming pool or spas should not be introduced to the OWS. LIMITATIONS An OWS design should be installed by a contractor who is experienced in its installation. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted. If subsurface conditions considerably different from those described in this report are encountered, we should be notified to evaluate the effect on the proposed OWS. If the health department makes modifications to this design, we should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the performance of the OWS. The county and our firm must be contacted upon completion of the OWS All construction is to be in accordance with the ISDS regulations. Pipe type and size, burial requirements, septic tank construction, and other specifications, which are not depicted in our report, are to conform to the requirements of the ISDS regulations. The installer of the system is to have demonstrated knowledge of the APEHD ISDS regulations and requirements. CHURCH & Associat V • : O O C �ST� hGH S :` 13172 s; Edward O. Church, t0 �F •'•••.....••'N ss�0 N AL EAG EOC/trp 3 copies sent 000010 710 BILL CREEK ROAD SW1 /4 & SE1 /4, SECTION 27, T8S, R88W PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO 0 0 0 0 F-` 1 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE 1 � AREA TO BE USED \ FOR FUTURE OWS BUILD -OUT I \ JONE 1250 -GALLON TWO-COMPARTMENT' PRECAST CONCRETE�•,�� SEPTIC TANK WITH ` PUMP IN BIOTUBE VAULT IN SECOND `COMPARTMENT DISTRIBUTION \ BOX 2" Pvc PUMP LINE \ 1 CLEANOUT APPROX '"/ATE LOCATION OF TWO BVDROOM PROPOSED RFCIIIiN('F EXISTING BUILDINGS AND ENVELOPES AL RIVER WELL %!J • •, ra 100 YEAR FLOOD PL 5iUALL 1 " = 100' NO WELLS WITHIN 500 FEET OF PROPOSED DRAIN FIELD SITE PLAN, LOCATION OF PERCOLATION HOLES, AND LOCATION OF PROPOSED OWS 1 IRRIGATION ` DITCH l Ii 279 SF OF INFILTRATIVE AREA IN TWO GRAVELLESS TRENCHES I WITH CHAMBERS. EACH I TRENCH MUST HAVE 1 ROW OF 9 CHAMBERS I IN50 FEET SETBACK TO IRRIGATION DITCH 1 �E---DRIVEWAY ENVELOPE I I I i STING DRIVEWAY JOB NO. 11948 FIGURE 1 El r-.13 TYPICAL PLAN VIEW - N.T.S. 4" SDR 35 PERFOR, PLACED ON GROUN[ TO MANUFACTURER! 3'T_ TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION -N.T.S. 4' SDR 35 PVC TOTAL - TWO TRENCHES __-------OBSERVATION/VENT PIPE WITH CAP ACKFILL EXTENT OF EXCAVATION 3' MAX S ' MIN. LOPE FOR DRAINgGE 1.5' MIN GRAVELLESS CHAMBER 3' BY 6.25' CALCULATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN CRITERIA RESIDENCE — 2 BEDROOMS, <2000 SF LOADING — 75 GAL/DAY/PERSON TOTAL LOADING — 300 GPD PERCOLATION TEST — 14 MPI AREA — (1.75 X Q XRT)/5 AREA — 393 SF REDUCTION FOR USE OF CHAMBERS — 30% TOTAL AREA — 275 SF ON BOX TYPICAL DISTRIBUTION BOX - N.T.S. 3' APPROXI PLAN VIEW Z r— im 1 1' APFROX. TRENCH SPECIFICATIONS NUMBER OF TRENCHES — 2 LENGTH OF EACH TRENCH — 56.25 FEET, 9 CHAMBERS WIDTH OF EACH BED — 3 FEET, 1 CHAMBERS TOTAL NUMBER OF CHAMBERS — 18 CHAMBERS TOTAL AREA — 279 SF DRAIN FIELD DETAILS CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION BOX 4" SDR 35 PVC PIPE r—INLET INLET OUTLET VIEW MEW �5 * MINIMUM OF FOUR OUTLETS NEEDED TREATMENT UNIT SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CAPACITY — 1.75 X 0 X (30 HOURS/24 HOURS) _ 657 GALLONS RECOMMENDATION — ONE 1250 GALLON TWO COMPARTMENT PRE—CAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS WITH A PUMP IN A BIOTUBE VAULT TO 8" 1.5' APPROX. 1' APf ROX. s INLET OUTLET VIEW MEW �5 * MINIMUM OF FOUR OUTLETS NEEDED TREATMENT UNIT SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CAPACITY — 1.75 X 0 X (30 HOURS/24 HOURS) _ 657 GALLONS RECOMMENDATION — ONE 1250 GALLON TWO COMPARTMENT PRE—CAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS WITH A PUMP IN A BIOTUBE VAULT co E a> litT (m so C 000013 A_' 'dC U O V E w D u w = o cL ((N .0ZX[] 07 •V O 1i W n y € ^ 0 a \ a v ri LL t .Q- CEL CL rL Q c yy T UW 7 a� 0 _] C 0y7 FDS J6 Q' U ? M W a O O r? .1-11 rr) vo oC' w 1� v� W LZ w to 2 N C" U to E N C rn W a M ch � o ao Q1 6 z a a Or 0 v v� N 0 O N Y) O 1030H011 PeaH aiweu'SO P101 O QJ Q LL7 N O O O V O M O O O L LU (] d r" W i 4l N (U ) N (D 0) Q) O L±1 <t r O O 117 LO N 4 M M O O v CL 0 v QZ: u�, 0 (ll O Q Q1 z a o o O O U y (] D 3 S J Cf1 _1 d s w v o J = O i - I, d y E iAooia moll I'll 0. 1 I mill in I Emilio I INF Ell oil Us on on v� N 0 O N Y) O 1030H011 PeaH aiweu'SO P101 Q> O QJ Q LL7 N O O O V O M O O O L LU (] d r" W 4l N (U ) N (D 0) Q) O L±1 <t r O O 117 LO N 4 M M O O v CL 0 v QZ: u�, 0 (ll O Q Q1 z Q> N C N QJ 0 .� N 4 4> Q. .a � N L LU (] d W CL CV G> v QZ: u�, (ll O Q Q1 a o o O O U y (] D 3 S J Cf1 _1 d s w v o J = O i - I, d y E iAooia 0 h 0 M ='l E APPENDIX A HP GEOTECH SUBSOIL STUDY AND PERCOLATION TEST HABERMAN RESIDENCE 710 BILL CREEK ROAD P1TKIN COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 199 827 NOVEMBER 15, 1999 000015 Todd Haberman Construction November 15, 1999 Page 5 Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on 1:9, :4999 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig'. 2 and consist of about 1'/z feet of topsoil and 3 feet of medium dense silty sand overlying relatively dense silty sandy gravel with cobbles. The percolation test results are presented in Table II. The percolation test results indicate an infiltration rate between 12 and 17 minutes per inch with an average of`' ° JWh. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to H -P GEOTECH 000016 6' �at, 642 6430 6440 6450 6460 A \ Z� c— — -----1 \ \6460 BUILDING VELOPE 7� 6450 AN �\ -- ��! / DEVELOPMENT _ N ENVELOPE P 3 � I P 2A J \ PROFILE P 1 PIT � J r� L J EXISTING CARETAKER UNIT IT 1� FXISTINC; /%A / ] "r OU I HUILDHIGS r I �. EXISTING STABLE rr . / EXISTING / ( � RESIDENCE ._ J APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 6390 6400 6410 6420 <--�30 6440 1 " = 100' 199 ,277HEPWORTH - PAWLAK LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PIT Fig. 1 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. I AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES 000017 --r r Disturbed bulk sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on October 18, 1999 with a trackhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were measured by instrument level and refer to the Bench Mark shown on Fig. 1. Logs of exploratory pits are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory pit iocation5 ono elevubuns anu—u oc w„sidcred uceu;-o.c cr,:y t:, :i implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 199827 I HE WOECHNIC PAWLA I LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS I Fig. 2 I =1 PIT 1 PROFILE PIT ELEV. = 94' ELEV. = 99' 0 0 We=e.2 : DO -106 ' � - o- -200=34 1 5 � `•a '' _r :o 0 5 .o`•• .. • •a. WC=4.4 DD -105 O 4• , aE 10 10 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; silty sandy clay, stiff, moist, brown, organic. -• SAND (SM); silty, with gravelly lenses, medium dense, slightly moist to moist, light reddish brown, slightly calcareous. GRAVEL (GM); in a silty sand matrix with scattered cobbles, medium dense to dense, slightly '°• moist to moist, light reddish brown, slightly calcareous. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. --r r Disturbed bulk sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on October 18, 1999 with a trackhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were measured by instrument level and refer to the Bench Mark shown on Fig. 1. Logs of exploratory pits are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory pit iocation5 ono elevubuns anu—u oc w„sidcred uceu;-o.c cr,:y t:, :i implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 199827 I HE WOECHNIC PAWLA I LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS I Fig. 2 I =1 .. . HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE it PFRCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 199 827 Note: Per'ColdtiorI ta3t hUles were hand dug in 6::.......-1 �i LLKIIUt: ,P:.:- alli jod:G(_PLi . _ , I "':.19. -1,110 ? I: were protected from freezing overnight with rigid foam insulation. Percolation tests were conducted on October 19, 1999. The average percolation rates shown were based on the last three readings of each test. 000019 WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) P-1 50 10 101/4 81/4 2 12 81/4 63/4 1 1/2 6 314 5314 1 53/4 43/4 1 43/4 4 3/4 4 31/4 3/4 P-2 62 10 93/4 81/4 1 1/2 17 81/4 7 1 1/4 7 6 1 6 51/4 3/4 51/4 43/4 1/2 43/4 41/4 1/2 P-3 56 10 83/4 63/4 2 13 63/4 51/4 1 1/2 51/4 41/4 1 41/4 31/2 3/4 3 112 21/2 1 21/2 2 1/2 Note: Per'ColdtiorI ta3t hUles were hand dug in 6::.......-1 �i LLKIIUt: ,P:.:- alli jod:G(_PLi . _ , I "':.19. -1,110 ? I: were protected from freezing overnight with rigid foam insulation. Percolation tests were conducted on October 19, 1999. The average percolation rates shown were based on the last three readings of each test. 000019 0 DOTED EDGE REPRESENT WERE THE GROUND SL❑F DOWN TO THE RIVER VALLEY FLOOR, @400F IS PLAN s 00 i•=w'—o• DOTED LINE REPRESENTS TOP h 11 OFBOULDAER WALL ANDle N DRIVE 000020 z Q Z ❑ 5 10 20 1u, _ 10' BASIS Cr HEARING = EXISTING STRUCTURE CONTOUR INTERVAL > V NORTH NOTES: 0 I. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF ROUGH FRAMING Jim CA v uil l7j W jV .� �. q1l Limits Of Mapping. .r+' 1•"94 x ti7C it1.n yC. —~ o e e a e e o t Df B ild nx �u v _ a. a o6 a t, i 0 �, �✓ otal / Ao 1 Orth Bill reek Roa B>ildiag ve • \ to Hwy 133 / A30 6 � 100w.Ye iY9 p y, 64 DO 6390 0 Current ge o River, ® M ami a� S� N O L0 a N O O r t ^. y rwwH BRASS CAP S 1/4 COR.. SEC. 27 POUND REHA11 W 63g0 Property Boundar ' Property Boundary w. 0022 (D o a a DESIGN WORKSHOP 120 East Main Street ASPEN,COLDRAD30 61611 Facalmle )(970) 920-1387 Albuawrque . Aspen• Deliver Jackson Sao Paula- Santa Fe Temps • Lake Tahoe. Vol Lands kchlteauue • Lana Planning Ikbm Dedr . TamWn Planep H! li r1 SITE UTILIZATION PLAN 111111110 PROPOSE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SWI/4 SE1/4 SEC 27 T8S R88W/SURVEY BY1 LINES IN SPACE BOX 121 CARB❑NDALE DATE DESCRIPTION 10.9198 T-- REV.- ISSUE —REV:ISSUE DATE: DRAWN:... REVIEWED scale 1."=50' 0 25 50 100 PROJECT NUM: 1912 DOREEN GOLDYN 1041 REVIEW SHEET NUNBER 4 OF 4 QW.Yea,T eeneeraawQr lxc, n..r 1 FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 0000123 NOTES: 0 I. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF ROUGH FRAMING r'r'I ■ ■ ■ Inlllllll ■ MCOTTLEYAW■ ■GRAYBEAL ■ LTD ■ ■ ■510 EAST HYW ■ ■ASPEN, CO. 81611■ ■P 970)925-2867■ ■ �970)925-3736■ ■ P,O.BOX 3507■ ■107 NORTHTEMURI■ ■ ' 81435 , ■ ■ 'I F 970)728-3236■ ■■■■■■■■■■ momon ONE ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■n■■■■■■■ ■■■n■n■■nn ■■■■■■■n■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ GOLDYN RESIDENCECARETAKER ■ITKIN1 UNTY COLORADO 11 SEEM 3- 311SEEM■I ■■■■■i ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ iiiiiiiiii ■■■■■■■■■■ iii■moiin■ii ■■■■■■■■■■ mostolloom ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■o■■■■■ ■■■■■ sono■■■■■■ ■■s■no■■■n M■■■■■■■■M � Er ■ ■ r-^ ■m■■M■■■■N a\ 1 +t 17 1 NEW NEWS:ZIP MR AM i - � . - • � � -fib '�. MCA w fill i) G DESIGN WORKSHOP 120 East Main Street ASPEN. COLORADO 81811 (970) 925-8354 FaosimBe (970) 920-1387 Albuquerque . Aepen• :Denver Jadroon Bao Poulo• Santo Fe Tempe • Lake Toho. Voll Laedeowo Arahiteotun • Lmd Planning Urban Door . T—M. Plannhq islMoNdo WI A �I� a V � �I SITE UTILIZATION PLAN LEGAL BASEMENTS LEGAL DESCRIPTIONI. SW1/4 SE1/4 SEC 27 TSS R88W/SURVEY BYi LINES IN SPACE BOX 121 CARBONDALE # DATE DESCRIi TION ins/ii/isee _ H0I9i98 REV:_ ISSUE DATE: DRAWN:,. RENEWED:: Scale 0 25 so 100 MISSION PROJECT NUM: 1912 DOREEN GOLDYN 1041 REVIEW SHEET IA111But 1 OF 4 H'JaOrTel Oni O[EWNNp11WHpp IeO. Heel / a m t, ,�,� ♦. �� 10 4 ,' `Alm EdI�� -rIL� ti I e• 1 DESIGN WORKSHOP 120 East Moln Street ASPEN, CDLDRADO 81811 Foctimlle (970) 920-1387 1387 Albuquerque • Aspen- Dwwr Jadawn Soo Paulo- Santo Fe Tempo • Lake Toho. Val Lawefmpe ArehMckrte • law Phminq alae owls . Tpf1e plelnfq i Q � � a � �j SITE UTILIZATION PLAN SLopir LEGAL DESCRIPTIONI SWI/4 SEI/4 SEC 27 T8S R88W/SURVEY BY, LINES IN SPACE BOX 121 CARBONDALE # DATE DESCMOON 1W..'8 T _ TI REV:_ I ISSUE DATE: DRANN:_REMEWED; a scile 1."=S0' b zS .. So100 PROJECT NUM: 1912 DOREEN GOLDYN 1041 REVIEW %UT NUMBER 3 OF 4 n11eNf l•eleNeeeffllef INC. few w 1ESIGN WORKSHOP 20 East Main Street ASPEN, COLORADO 81811 FaasM(rlle )(970) 9820--1387 UMpuergre • Asper- Denwr ICkson Bao Paulo. Santa Fe Temps • Lake Toho Val nee•epe ArdebeWn • Lend Plaxi•q UPoon Dwp • T—f— Pww" W Z. HI TqI JJ 1 1i SITE UTILIZATION PLAN ITE ANALYSIS EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGAL DESCRIPTI❑Ni SW1/4 SE1/4 SEC 27 T8S R88W/SURVEY BYI LINES IN SPACE BOX 121 CARB❑NDALE # DATE DESCRIF TON s_e/ay/tope IM" REV: ISSUE DATE: ORANN**:�� REVIEWED. i� Scale 0 25 50 100 PROJECT NDN° 1912 DOREEN GOLDYN 1041 REVIEW 91m NuwetER - 2 OF 4 cow ran owawawiwoP do, 1#0 - � l e � lir► �r/►' �-------� i��l�t_� ,'� r. ;•r�••.>•rt t tR�s � � � � _ - /, ',�_ / / t � `-' -.-- "rases- Lam._ � � - ��• ,•` �A� � � )I •' F `C a�i "�"',9!7"'r �! T�^7� , �.='- _�Ir7�_�7.� R.'C�i`�'e ��aT�r� . �`SAM a '�—..�� -moi.•; �� :\� Is WSMC -M WINDS am IT, LOW 1 r r r. ME ,- WE, r —� tea, Rive'r As Per 1ESIGN WORKSHOP 20 East Main Street ASPEN, COLORADO 81811 FaasM(rlle )(970) 9820--1387 UMpuergre • Asper- Denwr ICkson Bao Paulo. Santa Fe Temps • Lake Toho Val nee•epe ArdebeWn • Lend Plaxi•q UPoon Dwp • T—f— Pww" W Z. HI TqI JJ 1 1i SITE UTILIZATION PLAN ITE ANALYSIS EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGAL DESCRIPTI❑Ni SW1/4 SE1/4 SEC 27 T8S R88W/SURVEY BYI LINES IN SPACE BOX 121 CARB❑NDALE # DATE DESCRIF TON s_e/ay/tope IM" REV: ISSUE DATE: ORANN**:�� REVIEWED. i� Scale 0 25 50 100 PROJECT NDN° 1912 DOREEN GOLDYN 1041 REVIEW 91m NuwetER - 2 OF 4 cow ran owawawiwoP do, 1#0 - � Now q'141 - ;ZPy-00 �7 88 PITKIN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PERMIT NUMBER / Z RECEIPT NUMBER ?),/Jg-*S;Z Owner ��"� Phone No. 91/3- 3179 Owner's Mailing Address ®147'x-'" Contractor'''"-� !'ifs-� c c_c�& s� Phone No. Address SW GG 3 - �� (� �� cf�L1 3 System's Contractor's Name Address Legal Description sW S ,Q��.• 017, `�yu"w` y� S - q�" +�� Lot Size �D aC a� Type of Building by Use U� Number of Bedrooms '3 Type of Water Supply i Owner's Signature ��' Date PLOT PLAN: ATTACHED AS RE I RED Type of Individual Sewage Disposal System ,�/c �iga/fc Type of Soil or Soil Classification -51ld-I-X45j;y Proximal Location of Bedrock LX°T r%E��l-E�IT %f g FT Proximal Location of Ground Water Table /J®T QET /��I_**�Tfe 72ZO(40 15;,F_7._ Percolation Test Date 9"2_7- 7L - 17 Minutes Per Inch Minimum Recommended Absorption System Size l 3D —`4 - FT Minimum Recommended Tank Size A'DOD GAI-1-DAIS Special Conditions of Issue: NOTICEP � When properly signed for issuance, this application becomes your permit. Application valid one year from date. If an individual sewage disposal permit Is issued for property on which no building permit has been A issued, the individual sewage disposal permit shall expire 120 days after its issuance If construction has not been commenced. Any change in plans or speci- fications after the permit has been issued invalidates the permit, unless approval is secured from the Health Officer for such changes. Approved for Issuance By Date /O /5--,79 dF 1! iF iF 1F iF iF �F iF * * ik 1F iF iF M k iF dF it iF it dF �F �F it it it # it it it it iE lF if # iF it iF * iF it it �: it it t * it it if it * it it it iF it iF it it it * it it it it it M'i�t/1i/fit iF it it iF it it 1t iF �F �F iF it N dk it it iF �winnr�T�nLI Anil Mn\/AI I��IlI/.�`nta (Drawing of System on Back) U0G I '.1 �,UUOU 0 E& 506 E. MAIN STREET P I T K I 011 )002 T Mr. Jim Stevens P.O. Box 663 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 October 3, 1979 Re: Individual sewage disposal system for the Pat Taylor residence Dear Jim: Enclosed please fine a sewage disposal permit application for the referenced property. This should be completed and returned to us as soon as possible. The permit fee is $75.00. We have already completed the percolation test, andthe rate was 17 minutes per inch. This means for a three bedroom house, the county regulations require approximately 630 square feet of Littom area for any leach field. If your have any further questions, please call. RFN/mh Sincerely, Robert F. Nelson, County Sanitarian Y 14