Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.res.046.2015FOR ASSESSORS AND COUNTY COMMISSIONERS USE ONLY (Section III or Section IV must be completed) Evey pemen for abatement or refund fded pursuant to section 3&10.114 shall h acted upon pursuant to Ore prop lens a Pis section Who mord a/county oomrntsabnere or Ne assessor, as amimP late, widen sur Months of the date of filing such petition. If 38-1-113(1.7). C.R.S. Section ill: Written Mutual Agreement of Assessor and Petitioner (Only for eb.t.ments up to $1,000) The commissioners of County authorize the assessor by Resolution No. to review petitions forabatement or refund and to settle by written mutual agreement any such petition oT r abatement or refund in an amount of one thousand dollars or less per tract, parcel, or lot of land or per schedule of personal property, in accordance with § 39-1-113(1.5), C.R.S. The assessor and petitioner mutually agree to the values and tax abatement/refund of: Toe Year Tax Year Actual Asserted _TBE Actua AtMossed L original Contacted Abate/Refund Note; The tool lox amourd does not include a uxued interest, penalties. and area associated wah we rhNor dila w l to, payments, It applicable. plisse contact clue county measurer for as payment nrmml PetitbnsYs literature Deb acseasoes or Deputy Assessors slgnamn Data Section ; Decision of the County Commissioners Mole hox X d (Must be coompleted If Secfiem 111 does not apply) (/I 11 WHEREAS, 111HERS, The County Commissioners of }Y:/ Atf County, State ofo bratlo,,a a duty and lawfully called regular meeting held on rLl / t which meeting there were present the following members: \ N '91 Yj�r laealtel�t(aaMr�ItA6 iu d ("�rla,lille • with notice of such meeting aril an oD Unity to be present having been given to the tai r and the Assessor of said County and Assessor Mdng present- not present) and petitioner S�Qf�IY�i-Sf LJ 4�(belrrg present tpresenQ, tl WHEREAS, The said Name County Commissioners have carefully considered the within petition, and are fully advised in relation thereto, NOW BE IT RESOLVED, That the a fee oes not agree) with the recommendation of the assessor and thepetition be (approved pved in part--denieco with an abatemenVrefured as follows: _ � #rotide _ Year Assessed Value Taxes AbaWRefund Year Assessed Value eaxld _1 hallpeiam 0(ala eaard OfCW emdwsx MiR' slam, kl M (County Clerk and Ex-ollCI of the CdRtynpr�hnt in and for the aforementioned county. do herebbyy certify that the above d 'going is truly e0 record of the proceedings of tie Board of County Commissioners. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hve hereunto set my hand and affixed t seal said Co O O A00 this /G day of[.� C/ Month Year lA.il Note: Abatements greater than $1.000 per schedule, per year, must W tubrntttso in duplicaiiii to the Sectiony: Action of the Property Tax Administrator (For an abatement, grater Nan $1,0001 The action of the Board of County Commissioners, relative to the within petition, is hereby ❑ Approved ❑ Approved in part $ ❑ Denied for the following reason(s): Sechr ys Prop" Tax Ack irpstrabls Siamoure Dab PETITION FOR ABATEMENT OR REFUND OF TAXES County: Pitkin Date Received (Use Assessa's m Commissianerc' Oate stamp) Section 1: Petitioner, please complete Section 1 only. Date: March 30, 2015 Month Day Yew Petitioner's Name: Snowmass Club I LLC Petitioners Mailing Address: 250 Gibraltar Rd p Horsham, PA 19044 City or Town State zip Cafe SCHEDULE OR PARCEL NUMBER(S) PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY R013724 Snowmass Goff and Athletic Club R013757 Snowmass Goff and Athletic Club Petitioner states mat me taxes assessed against the above property for property tax year(s) 2013 and 2014 are incorrect for the following reasons: (Briefly describe the circumstances surrounding the incorrect value or tax. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Excess valuation placed in the dub using DPT golf course model that was overturned by the Court of Appeals and upheld by the Colorado Supreme Court. This revised valuation is calculated pursuant to the Courrs decision. Petitioner's estimate of value: $ 7,150,0002( 013 ) and $ 7.150,000 2014 value year vena Year Petitioner requests an abatement or refund of the appropriate taxes. I declare, uror penalty of perjury In the second degree, that this petition, together with any accompanying exhibits or statepFms, s been�freyared or examined by me. and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, is .._: _..r Daytime Plane Number Daytime Phone Number ( 303 ) 749-g0o3 'Letter of agency must be attached when petition Is aubtnated by an agent. If the board of county commissioners, pursuant to section 39.10.114(1), or the property tax administrator, pursuant to section 39.2.116, denies the petition for refund or abatement of taxes in whole or in part, the petitioner may appeal to the board of assessment appeals pursuant to the provisions of section 39-2-125 within thirty days of the entry of any such decision, ¢ 39-10-114.5(1), C.R.S. Section Ii: Assessor's Recommendation (For AseeafMs Uea Onty) Tax Year Tax Year A ,nal AifR' ed I23 Ac a l AseweaW TM Original Contacted S e t c S U t>^ AbawRefund Assessor recommends approval as outlined above. No protest was filed for the year(s): ZDB orzh� u pf a protest was filed, please attach aco of the NOV.) ❑ Assessor recommends denial for the following reason(s): PITKIN COUNTY ASSESSOR 506 East Main Street, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 Phone(970)920-5160 Fax(970)920-5174 2013-2014 VALUATION FOR ABATEMENT STIPULATION TAXPAYER: Snowmass Club t, LLC SCHEDULE NUMBER: R013724 and R013757 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Snowmass Club Subdivision, Lot 1 of Parcel 4 and Lot 10 The Pitkin County Assessor and the above mentioned Taxpayer stipulate to the value noted below for the 2013 and 2014 Valuation of Assessment of the noted property. The agreed upon value will be binding for both years of the valuation cycle unless changes occur (new construction, demolition, subdivision, etc.) that would result in an increase or decrease in value. In any proceeding or dispute between the parties regarding the actual value of the Subject Property for tax years other than 2013 and 2014, neither parry will offer into evidence or otherwise use for any purpose this Stipulation or the stipulated value of the subject property for tax year 2013 and 2014, it being understood and agreed that this Stipulation represents a compromise of disputed claims and is not an admission by either party. STIPULATED VALUE: S See Attached Summary ... ,ye?s Representative — 5r Date 5 � I Assessor Reprose d% Date �E V V �^ N d n ]p N a pp� 3 m � v y c IO C A c � moo. D VNi W �O .Z $06 00 W O 00 < W V W d gs$r N N N N N O% W G O O O d H �H yl l0 N d N N N 00 00 w V N V d n O Q O ], .di W � a m � a a y c 01 C 01 c � 7 a n mc d 14 N H N N�nn O U 0�i Ip N 8�W< O O d C nt to M J t bIw 00 0 V V A A 03