HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.264322300006 (2004)DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat(s)
PARC - W- DATE RCVD: 3/18/2004 # COPIES: 18 CASE NO P042-04
CASE NAME: W/J Metropolitan District Service Plan Planners Lance Clarke
PROJ ADDR:I Woody Creek S -T -R 21-9-85 22-9-85
OWN/APP: W/J Metro District Or ADR Box 12393 C/S2: Aspen, CO 81612 PHN:F—
REP: Mark Fuller ADR: FT38 Fawn Drive C/S2: Carbondale, CO 8162 PHN: 963-4959
Email Addr:
ALLOCATED HOURS:
FEES DUE: $2135 FEES RCVD $2135 #16869 % OVER: �—
REFERRALS Woody CreekCaucus. Engineer, Envionmental Health, Finance. W/J HOA
REF: 3/18/2004 BY J. Taylor DUE: 4/10/2004
LQ DATE
REV BODY PH NOTICED
DATE OF FINAL ACTION:
4/28/2004
3/30/2004
P&Z I
BOCC Reso:
054-2004 #497278
4/14/2004
BOCC yes 1
4/28/2004 ,
BOCC
BOCC Ord:
(S I no vesting // GF 2643-223-00.006
P2:
HRG OFF:
CLOSED: 5/11/2004 BY: J. Taylor
HO INDEX:
ADMIN:
PLAT RECORDED— PLAT (BK,PG): nla ADMIN INDEX:
VR APPROVAL DATE: F VR EXPIRES:
CASE TYP: IService Plan
CASE TYP2: 10ther
CASE TYP3:
CASE TYP4:
FFile Location:
CASE TYPS:
CASE TYPE:
CASE TYP7:
Date Scanned: 9/30/2015
c 04 THU 16:55 FAX
RECEIVED
JUN 2 3 2004
BOCC OFFICE
DISTRICT COURT, PITIGN COUNTY, COLORADO
CuurtAddress: 506 E. Main, Suite 300
Aspen, CO 81611
IN RE TIIE ORGANIZATION OF
THE W/J METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
Allorneys for Plaintiffs:
Robert M. Noone, #12452
NOONE & HALL, P.C.
1001 Grand Ave., Suite 207
P.O. Drawer 39
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Telephone: (970).945-4500
Facsimile: (970) 945-5570
E-mail: rmn(ct�noonelaw.com
A COURT USE ONLY
Case No.:c-22Y-L-L%C!5
Ctrm.
NOTICE. OF HEARING ON PETITION
PUBLIC NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN that there was filed in the District Court in and for
the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, on the 26th day of May, 2004 a Petition entitled "In Re the
Organization of The W/J Metropolitan District," which Petition prays for the organization of a
metropolitan district (the "District") pursuant to theprovisions of Title 32, Article 1, Part 3, Colorado
Revised Statutes. Notice is further given that the resolution of the Board of County Commissioners
of Pitkin County approving the Service Plan was also filed with the Court in this matter as required
by law. Said documents are now on file at the office of the Clerk of the Pitkin County District Court,
in Aspen, Colorado, and are available for public inspection.
The proposed W/J Metropolitan District is located in the Woody Creek area approximately 5
miles northwest of the City of Aspen in Sections 21 and 22, Township 9 South, Range 85 West of
the 6th P.M. in unincorporated Pitkin County, Colorado. More specifically, the property is located on
both sides of McLain Flats Road and Upper Woody Creek Road and adjacent to the east side of the
True Smith Bridge.
The proposed W/J Metropolitan District will comprise 80.749 acres, and will include within
its borders the W/J Ranch Filings 1 through 5, Parcel 2, and common open space. A legal description
and map of the W/J Metropolitan District is included in Appendix A, attached hereto.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that by an Order of the Pitkin County District Court, a public
hearing on said Petition for organization will be held at the hour ofif.m., in the District Courtroom
at the449 irrClounty Courthouse,) 5964, Mam.
dcv , Aspcn, CO 81611, on the -Q n t1 lay of
G n r4rct S
i yv , 2004, at which time and place any parties
or persons in interest may appear if they so desire, subject to the limitations imposed by the law.
000001 :,-v (04
11004/005
d4 THU 16:55 P.9% 0005/005
No later than ten (10) days before the hearing, the owner of any real property within the
proposed District may file a petition with the Court stating reasons why such property should not be
included in the proposed District and requesting that such property be excluded therefrom. Such
petition shall be duly verified and shall describe the property to be excluded. The Courtshall hear
such petition and all objections thereto at the time of the hearing on the Petition for organization and
shall determine whether, in the best public interest, such property should be excluded from or
included in the proposed District_
In the event the Court orders that the question of the organization of the proposed District be
submitted to the electors of the proposed District, the electors of the proposed District shall elect five
(5) directors of the District who may be nominated by written petition.
Gam+ Clerk of the District Cou
Pitkin County, Colorado
000002
In Re the Organization of The W/,JMetropolitan District
Notice of Hearing on Petition
Page 2 of 2
4
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 21 AND SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH,
RANGE 85 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF
COLORADO; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 21, THENCE N
00°59'15" W ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SECTION 21 A DISTANCE OF 660.29
FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY W/J LOWE, THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY W/J
LOWE BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES:
1. S 89059'24" E A DISTANCE OF 624.31 FEET;
2. N 88015'37" E A DISTANCE OF 101.14 FEET;
3. S 81009'24" E A DISTANCE OF 129.56 FEET;
4. S 75040'23" E A DISTANCE OF 107.55 FEET;
5. S 58044'24" E A DISTANCE OF 280.51 FEET;
6. S 32050'24" E A DISTANCE OF 132.28 FEET;
7. S 26034'24" E A DISTANCE OF 206.15 FEET;
8. S 06013'24" E A DISTANCE OF 203.01 FEET;
9. S 58033'24" E A DISTANCE OF 720.55 FEET;
10.S 70017'30" E A DISTANCE OF 69.88 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WHITE STAR DRIVE; THENCE LEAVING
SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WHITE STAR
DRIVE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6)
COURSES:
1. S 06048'41" E A DISTANCE OF 75.98 FEET;
2. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 295.53 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
61048'40", A DISTANCE OF 318.82 FEET (CHORD
BEARS S 24005'39" W 303.58 FEET);
3. S 54059'59" W A DISTANCE OF 281. 82 FEET;
4. S 23°13'42" E A DISTANCE OF 40.20 FEET;
5. S 15046'44" E A DISTANCE OF 125.91 FEET;
6. S 06°41'16" W A DISTANCE OF 74.96 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF McLAIN FLATS ROAD; THENCE
S 60028'10" W A DISTANCE OF 61.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF McLAIN FLATS ROAD; THENCE ALONG
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF McLAIN FLATS ROAD THE
FOLLOWING ELEVEN (11) COURSES:
1. N 29031'50" W A DISTANCE OF 61.87 FEET;
000003
2 ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 487.16 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
17051'47", A DISTANCE OF 151.88 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
38027'44" W 151.27 FEET);
N 47023' 37" W A DISTANCE OF 81. 69 FEET; ALONG THE
3. ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF
4 620.82 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°24'18", A
DISTANCE OF 91.07 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 43011128" W
90.99 FEET);
5. N 38059'19" W A DISTANCE OF 124.57 FEET;
6. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 165.35 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
39052'39", A DISTANCE OF 115.08 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
58055136" W 112.77 FEET);
7. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 508.34 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
23056'32", A DISTANCE OF 212.42 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
66053142" W 210.88 FEET);
8 ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING RADIUS
OF 318.91 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30020'41", A
DISTANCE OF 168.90 (CHORD BEARS N 70005'47" W
166.94 FEET);
9. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 271.95 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
22050'42", A DISTANCE OF 108.43 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
73050'47" W 107.72 FEET);
10. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 789.51 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
21025'42", A DISTANCE OF 295.27 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
73008117" W 293.55 FEET)
11. N 83 ° 51' 08" W A DISTANCE OF 24.74 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS
SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT OF FILING NO.1, W/J RANCH HOMES,
A PLANNED COMMUNITY;" THENCE LEAVING SAID
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY THE
FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) COURSES;
1. S 00007'11" W A DISTANCE OF 325.78 FEET;
2. S 25056'45" E A DISTANCE OF 164.47 FEET;
3. S 22054'38" E A DISTANCE OF 153.62 FEET;
4. S 17006'55" E A DISTANCE OF 514.60 FEET;
5. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
29030121", A DISTANCE OF 102.99 FEET (CHORD BEARS S
31052'06" E 101.86 FEET);
6. S 46037'15" E A DISTANCE OF 217.02 FEET;
000004
►
i
7. S 25056'45" E A DISTANCE OF 189.49 FEET; THENCE
LEAVING SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY S 00°16'25" W A DISTANCE OF 226.91
FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF W/J LOWE; THENCE
ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY W/J LOWE BOUNDARY N 89°43'35" W A DISTANCE
OF 757.70 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY N
00016'25" E A DISTANCE OF 87.04 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A
CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 515.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 11"01'28", A DISTANCE OF 99.09 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
05014'19" W 98.94 FEET); THENCE N 10045'03" W A DISTANCE OF
712.14 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 811.57 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08002'36", A
DISTANCE OF 113.93 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 14046'21" W 113.84 FEET);
THENCE 'N 18047'39" W A DISTANCE OF 80.64 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE
ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 649.46 FEET AND A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17°49'16", A DISTANCE OF 202.00 FEET (CHORD
BEARS N 09053'01" W 201.19 FEET); THENCE N 00°58'23" W A DISTANCE
OF 179.61 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID FILING
NO. 1 THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID FILING NO.1 ALONG THE ARC OF A
CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 781.78 FEET AND A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 02041'30", A DISTANCE OF 36.73 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
32°27'05" W 36.72 FEET) ; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID FILING
NO.1 N 33047'50" W A DISTANCE OF 70.30 FEET; TO A POINT ON THE
WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID W/J LOWE; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY
BOUNDARY W/J LOWE THE FOLLOWING EIGHT (8) COURSES:
1. N 01059'11" E A DISTANCE OF 26.97 FEET;
2. S 88°37'29" W A DISTANCE OF 18.68 FEET;
3. N 33047'46" W A DISTANCE OF 0.31 FEET;
4. S 88037'29" W A DISTANCE OF 246.94 FEET;
5. N 02°46'18" W A DISTANCE OF 131.78 FEET;
6. N 02016'42" E A DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET;
7. N 51048'59" E A DISTANCE OF 85.47 FEET;
8. N.03°29'24" W A DISTANCE OF 257.06 FEET; THENCE
LEAVING SAID WESTERLY W/J LOWE BOUNDARY; N 03029'24" W A DISTANCE
OF 81.04 FEET; THENCE N 23'36'47" E A DISTANCE OF 93.23 FEET;
THENCE N 75019156" W A DISTANCE OF 133.32 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE
ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1170.08 FEET AND A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18020'45", A DISTANCE OF 374.65 FEET (CHORD BEARS
N 21025'41" W 373.05 FEET); THENCE N 30041'45" W A DISTANCE OF
372.51 FEET; THENCE S 89059'24" E A DISTANCE OF 579.60 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID W/J LOWE; THENCE ALONG SAID
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY S 00059'15" E A DISTANCE OF225.03 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING 80.749 ACRES
MORE OR LESS.
000005
000006
loll11111111I11111111111Hill11111111 49 sii� 112:14P
SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 0.00 D 0.00
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITIGN
COUNTY, COLORADO, APPROVING THE W/J RANCH METROPOLITAN
DISTRICT SERVICE PLAN
Resolution No.M�-2004
RECITALS
The W/J Metro District Organizing Committee (".Applicant') has applied to the
Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC'� for approval of the W/J
Metropolitan District Service Plan.
2. The District shall be responsible for the distribution of water, roadway
maintenance and improvements, landscaping and beautification improvements,
wastewater maintenance and improvements, solid waste collection, and
snowplowing within the District boundaries.
3. This application was heard before the Planning and Zoning Commission on
March 30, 2004, at which time a unanimous recommendation of approval was
forwarded to the BOCC.
4. The BOCC heard this application at first reading on April 14, 2004, and at second
reading and public hearing on April 28, 2004, at which time evidence and
testimony were presented with respect to this application.
5. The BOCC finds that the proposed W/J Metropolitan District Service Plan is
appropriate pursuant to Special District Act CRS 32-1-203, et seq.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners
that it hereby grants approval of the W/J Metropolitan District Service Plan subject to the
following conditions:
1. Implementation of the service plan is subject to review and approval by the /
County, subject to compliance with the applicable provisions of Section 3-80
(1041 Environmental Hazard Areas) and Section 3-90-020 (Site Selection of
Major New Domestic Water and Sewage Treatment Systems and Major
Extensions) of the Land Use Code.
2. Amendments to the service plan, including any expansion of the service area, are
subject to review by the Planning and Zoning Commission and approval by the
Board of County Commissioners.
3. The District shall comply with The Aspen Fire Protection District's standards for
water supply and hydrants for fire -fighting purposes as improvements take place.
q\�
v
Resolution Noa -2004 II III •
Paget IIII�IIIDAVISII �IN COUNTY ICo II�llltll�Il llll0 es9e: 22 0of 48 12: 14P
0. so
NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES
WEEKLY ON APRIL 3`", 2004.
APPROVED AT FIRST READING ON THE 14" DAY OF APRIL, 2004.
APPROVED AT SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 28th
DAY OF APRIL, 2004.
Jones
Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
' �Ely,
Case #P042-04
264322300006
lance/wj/WJ _ dist reso.doc
000007
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIOERS, PITKIN
COUNTY, COLORADO
w/117WIMM I;. VA
D. . s —
Date: 45-- Al— 0 x
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
lQ 6y C
may Houben,
Community Development Director
•�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIflIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIiIII III 05/906/2200e 62:14P
TKIN COUNTY CO R 0.00 D 0.00
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 21 AND SECTION 22,
TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION
21, THENCE N 00059'15" W ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF
SECTION 21 A DISTANCE OF 660.29 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY W/J LOWE, THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY W/J
LOWE BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES:
1. S 89059'24" E A DISTANCE OF 624.31 FEET;
2. N 88015'37" E A DISTANCE OF 101.14 FEET;
3. S 81009'24" E A DISTANCE OF 129.56 FEET;
4. S 75040'23" E A DISTANCE OF 107.55 FEET;
5. S 58044'24" E A DISTANCE OF 280.51 FEET;
6. S 32050'24" E A DISTANCE OF 132.28 FEET;
7. S 26034'24" E A DISTANCE OF 206.15 FEET;
B. S 06013'24" E A DISTANCE OF 203.01 FEET;
9. S 58033'24" E A DISTANCE OF 720.55 FEET;
10. S 70017'30" E A DISTANCE OF 69.88 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WHITE STAR DRIVE;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY ALONG THE EASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WHITE STAR DRIVE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6)
COURSES:
1. S 06048141" E A DISTANCE OF 75.98 FEET;
2. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 295.53 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
61°48'40", A DISTANCE OF 318.82 FEET (CHORD
BEARS S 24005'39" W 303.58 FEET);
3. S 54059'59" W A DISTANCE OF 281.82 FEET;
4. S 23013'42" E A DISTANCE OF 40.20 FEET;
5. S 15046'44" E A DISTANCE OF 125.91 FEET;
6. S 06041'16" W A DISTANCE OF 74.96 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF McLAIN FLATS ROAD;
THENCE S 60028110" W A DISTANCE OF 61.75 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF McLAIN FLATS ROAD; THENCE
ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF McLAIN FLATS ROAD THE
FOLLOWING ELEVEN (11) COURSES:
1. N 29031'50" W A DISTANCE OF 61.87 FEET;
000003
11AIN��IuNTy�NY�1 R:0.00 D s,
2. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 487.16 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
17°51147", A DISTANCE OF 151.88 FEET (CHORD
BEARS N 38027'44" W 151.27 FEET);
3. N 47023'37" W A DISTANCE OF 81.69 FEET;
4. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 620.82 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
08024'18", A DISTANCE OF 91.07 FEET (CHORD
BEARS N 43011'28" W 90.99 FEET);
5. N 38059'19" W A DISTANCE OF 124.57 FEET;
6. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 165.35 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
39°52'39", A DISTANCE OF 115.08 FEET (CHORD
BEARS N 58055'36" W 112.77 FEET);
7. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 508.34 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
23056132", A DISTANCE OF 212.42 FEET (CHORD
BEARS N 66053'42" W 210.88 FEET);
S. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING
RADIUS OF 318.91 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
30020141", A DISTANCE OF 168.90 (CHORD BEARS
N 70005'47" W 166.94 FEET);
9. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 271.95 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
22°50'42", A DISTANCE OF 108.43 FEET (CHORD
BEARS N 73050'47" W 107.72 FEET);,
10. LONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 789.51 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
21025'42", A DISTANCE OF 295.27 FEET (CHORD
BEARS N 73008117" W 293.55 FEET)
11. N 83051'08" W A DISTANCE OF 24.74 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE FULLY DEVELOPED
LANDS SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT OF FILING NO. 1, W/J
RANCH HOMES, A PLANNED COMMUNITY; THENCE LEAVING SAID
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY THE
FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) COURSES;
1. S 00007'11" W A DISTANCE OF 325.78 FEET;
2. S 25056'45" E A DISTANCE OF 164.47 FEET;
3. S 22054'38" E A DISTANCE OF 153.62 FEET;
4. S 17006'55" E A DISTANCE OF 514.60 FEET;
5. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
29030'21", A DISTANCE OF 102.99 FEET (CHORD
BEARS S 31052'06" E 101.86 FEET);
6. S 46037'15" E A DISTANCE OF 217.02 FEET;
• IIII� VIII IIIIII IIII II III III II VIII II VIII III 5 of 0
1100 05105//2000448012:14P
SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R
7. S 25056'45" E A DISTANCE OF 189.49 FEET; THENCE
LEAVING SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY S 00016'25" W A DISTANCE OF
226.91 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF W/J
LOWE; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY W/J LOWE BOUNDARY
N 89043'35" W A DISTANCE OF 757.70 FEET; THENCE LEAVING
SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY N 00016'25" E A DISTANCE OF 87.04
FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 515.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11001'28", A
DISTANCE OF 99.09 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 05°14'19" W 98.94
FEET); THENCE N 10045103" W A DISTANCE OF 712.14 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 811.57 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08002'36", A
DISTANCE OF 113.93 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 14°46'21" W 113.64
FEET); THENCE N 18°47139" W A DISTANCE OF 80.64 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 649.46 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17049116", A
DISTANCE OF 202.00 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 09053101" W 201.19
FEET); THENCE N 00058'23" W A DISTANCE OF 179.61 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID FILING NO. 1;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID FILING NO. 1 ALONG THE ARC OF
A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 781.78 FEET AND A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02041'30", A DISTANCE OF 36.73 FEET
(CHORD BEARS N 32°27'05" W 36.72 FEET); THENCE CONTINUING
ALONG SAID FILING NO. 1 N 33047'50" W A DISTANCE OF 70.30
FEET; TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID W/J
LOWE; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY W/J LOWE THE
FOLLOWING EIGHT (8) COURSES:
1. N 01059111" E A DISTANCE OF 26.97 FEET;
2. S 88037'29" W A DISTANCE OF 18.68 FEET;
3. N 33047'46" W A DISTANCE OF 0.31 FEET;
4. S 88037'29" W A DISTANCE OF 246.94 FEET;
5. N 02046'18" W A DISTANCE OF 131.78 FEET;
6. N 02016'42" E A DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET;
7. N 51048'59" E A DISTANCE OF 85.47 FEET;
8. N 03029'24" W A DISTANCE OF 257.06 FEET; THENCE
LEAVING SAID WESTERLY W/J LOWE BOUNDARY; N 03029'24" W A
DISTANCE OF 81.04 FEET; THENCE N 23036147" E A DISTANCE OF
93.23 FEET; THENCE N 75019'56" W A DISTANCE OF 133.32
FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 1170.08 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18020145", A
DISTANCE OF 374.65 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 21025'41" W 373.05
FEET); THENCE N 30041145" W A DISTANCE OF 372.51 FEET;
THENCE S 89059'24" E A DISTANCE OF 579.60 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID W/J LOWE; THENCE
ALONG SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY S 00059'15" E A DISTANCE OF
000010
0
0
225.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID PARCEL OF LAND
CONTAINING 80.749 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
R1�tl�CM��tl�4WY�k�°=:'"
000011
APR. 21. 2004c12 :.11 PM 1 PMP I�I N- CO
MANAGER N0. 3801
..,. -. Lch exclusion for 13OCC ay oda on Apni 28,...
P. 2—
Page 1 of 1
From: "mark and ellie" <gcp@rof.net>
To: <susanm@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: W/J ranch exclusion for BOCC agenda on April 28,2004
Date:. Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:11:31 -0600
X -Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X -MX -Spam: final=0.0090000000; heur=0.5000000000(1700); stat=0.0090000000; spamuaq-
heur-0.5000000000(2004042105)
X -MX -MAIL -FROM: <gcp@rof.net>
X -MX -SOURCE -IP: [216.237.90.254]
X-MailSeanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
To the Pitkin County Board of Commissioners
We are homeowners in W/J employee housing at 142 lower Bullwinkle. We have concerns relating to the
proposed W/J metropolitan district and would like to explore the possibility of excluding ourselves, We are
aware the deadline has passed however, our homeowners minutes show April 22nd as the deadline. I
discussed this with Mark Fuller, who suggested we speak to you as he believes the board has the authority
to waive the ten day deadline.
Our concerns are related to the combined financial responsibility of homeowners for septic systems. We
are fortunate that we have a very large (1,500) gallon individual septic system that is 'healthy'. We plan on
living here in this home for a long time and we realize in the long term we are going to pay close to the cost
of replacing our awn septic (according to the district projections over the next 30 years), It is our
understanding the housing department allows septic replacement as a capital improvement, consequently we
feel this makes more financial sense to us to go this route should it be necessary, As local employees living
in employee housing we feel a few thousand dollars each year (under the proposed district), that cannot be
re -cooped, makes no financial sense to the employee housing equation.
After talking with Mark Fuller, he could give me NO answers an how an excluded property will get its water
and access on roads but indicated we would get NO SERVICES.
We are finding answers very difficult to come by sinceeveryone we talk to is paid by Lowe.
If this is something you can help us with could we please arrange a time to talk to you.
Mark Roberts 923-5914 hm, 274-1897 cell, gcp@r nr
Thank -you, Mark and Ellie Roberts
ed for Susan Murphy <susanm(a)co.1ii6d&co.us>
000
0 0
iu 1016 CC "KIZI DIILSs
TO: Board of County Commissioners
��- Ut
THROUGH: Cindy Houtfen, ommunity Development Director
FROM: Lance Cl , Assistant Director
RE: W/J Ranch Metropolitan District Service Plan, 2nd Reading, Public Hearing
DATE: April 28, 2004
SUMMARY: The Applicant is applying to create a Metropolitan District pursuant to the Colorado
Special District Act in order to provide a basic Service Plan for the W/J Ranch PUD/Subdivision. The
purpose of the District is to finance, construct, and manage various elements associated with the
development and use of the property within the District.
APPLICANT: W/J Metro District Organizing Committee, c/o Lowe W/J LLC
ATIVE: Mark Fuller
DISTRICT AND SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: The proposed District Corporate boundary is the
80+ acres that comprise the three existing affordable housing subdivision filings of the W/J Ranch, the
proposed two new filings (one for the proposed five new free-market lots, and one for the proposed
relocated and new affordable housing), the existing Ranch "homestead" parcel, and the common open
space.
BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS: The W/J Ranch currently has an existing private road
system, a private water system supplied by wells, and individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS). The
water system needs upgrading and many of the septic systems are failing or are of the age that failure is
imminent.
The Applicant states that the proposed District includes 52 existing residential units which will increase to
72 units at full proposed build out. Presently, the Homeowner's Association charges fees of
approximately $136 per unit per month to provide services that Pitkin County and the other associated
special districts (Aspen Fire Protection District, Aspen Valley Hospital, CMC, RFTA, etc.) do not
provide, such as: snow removal, street maintenance, water service. Owners are individually responsible
for maintenance/replacement of ISDS. The Applicant has stated it is the intent of the District to provide
water service, road maintenance, waste water/septic, trash collection, snowplowing, miscellaneous
landscaping/beautification/lighting for approximately the same $136 monthly cost to individual
affordable housing homeowners. It is projected the free-market units will have a service cost of $532 per
month.
C y C C,_ l u1u1 ►M_ 0
• The application has been referred to the Environmental Health Department, the County Engineer,
The County Finance Director, The Woody Creek Caucus, and the W/J Homeowners Association.
00001
0 0
Unfortunately, the state -mandated turnaround time on Special District applications is such that
some of the referral agents have not been able to respond as of this date.
AUTHORITY: In accordance with the requirements of the Special District Act (CRS 32-1-101 et seq.),
the Planning Commission shall submit a recommendation on a special district service plan to the Board of
County Commissioners and the BOCC shall approve or deny such plan.
The County has the authority to approve the proposed district, if the following can be demonstrated,
pursuant to CRS 32-1-203, et seq.:
1. There is sufficient existing and projected need for organized service in the area to be served.
2. That existing service in the area to be serviced by the proposed district is inadequate for present and
projected needs.
3. The proposed district is capable of providing economical and sufficient service within its proposed
boundary.
4. The District has, or will have, the financial ability to discharge the proposed indebtedness on a
reasonable basis.
The County shall also consider the following:
I. Adequate service is not, or will not be, available to the area through the county or other existing
municipal or quasi -municipal corporations, including existing special districts, within a reasonable
time and on a comparable basis.
2. The facility and service standards of the proposed special districts are compatible with the facility and
service standards for each county within which the proposed special district is to be located and each
municipality which is an interested party.
3. The proposal is in substantial compliance with a master plan.
4. The proposal is in compliance with any duly adopted county, regional, or state long-range water
quality management plan for the area.
5. The creation of the proposed special district will be in the best interests of the area proposed to be
served.
LAND USE ISSUES:
Sufficient Need/Adequacy of Existing Service: The Applicant asserts that the current operation and
maintenance of the existing services provided by the Homeowner's Association, as well as needed
upgrades, expansions, and improvements, can be more effectively and efficiently provided by a
metropolitan district. The proposed Metro District would allow for the ability to incur debt to do the
improvements and retain better interest rates, and thus lessen the cost for the Homeowners.
Pitkin County has no future plan to provide for the operation, maintenance or improvements to the
existing services.
Financial Considerations: The proposed mill levy for the District is 48.5mills. The mill levy is estimated
based on the assessed value of the properties, and the cost of the proposed service plan.
1041 Review: Implementation of the service plan is subject to compliance with the applicable provisions
of Section 3-80 (1041 Environmental Hazard Areas) and Section 3-90-020 (Site Selection of Major New
Domestic Water and Sewage Treatment Systems and Major Extensions) of the Land Use Code.
000014
0 9
Compliance with Master Plans and County Policies: The Down Valley Comprehensive Plan ("DVCP")
contains the goals to "maintain a development pattern which preserves the rural character and high
quality environment which makes the Down Valley Area a desirable place to live and work," and to
"preserve the existing development pattern in which Snowmass Village, Aspen, and Basalt are separated
by rural areas." Improvement of services to the existing and proposed W/J Ranch development is not
inconsistent with these goals or the land use policies in the Code.
The Woody Creek Caucus Master Plan does not deal with the appropriateness of metro districts for the
area.
P&Z ACTION: The P&Z recommended approval of the District service plan by a 4-0 vote on March
30, 2004. The comments were all positive. Paul Rudnick expressed his continued concern that metro
districts allow a tax deduction for services not ordinarily provided by the County.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of
County Commissioners adopt a motion to approve the W/J Ranch Metropditan District Service Plan on 2nd
Reading.
ATTACHMENTS:
l .Clerk summary of actions
2. W/J Homeowners Assoc.
3. County Engineer comments
4. EHD comments
5.White Star Ranch comments
6. Finance comments
Application provided separately
P042-04
264322300006
lancec/wj metro dist. bocc memo2nd.doc
000015
0 0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
c/o Lance Clarke
FROM: Silvia Davis,33
RE: Service Plan — Proposed Formation of W/J Metropolitan District
DATE: March 3, 2004
A service plan for a proposed district was filed in my office today, March 2, 2004. The contact
person filing the service plan is Mark Fuller, 970-963-4959.
Per CRS 32-1-204(2), the clerk and recorder must deliver the service plan to the county planning
commission. In compliance with this statute, I am forwarding 6 service plans to you today. As
liaison for the planning commission, will you please deliver these to the proper persons. This
statute states that the planning commission has 30 days from the date of fling the plan to make a
recommendation to the board, which is by April 1st.
I will talk to administration about the following:
1. Set Date for a Public Hearing. Schedule an agenda item (Packet due April 8, 4:00
PM) for the regular BOCC meeting of April 14, 2004. At this meeting the BOCC will
set a date for a public hearing within 30 days of April 14th (CRS 32-1-202). The
next regular meeting after April 14t" that satisfies this criteria is April 28th. (Statute
says "At the next regular meeting of the BOCC which is held at least 10 days after
the final planning commission action on the service plan, the BOCC shall set a day
for a public hearing on the service plan").
2. Public Hearing. Schedule an agenda item for public hearing for April 28, 2004
(packet material due April 22nd at 4:00 PM).
3. Publication. April 3rd issue of Aspen Times Weekly. For your information, statute
requires the BOCC to make publication of this hearing at least 20 days before the
hearing date [32-1-204(1)].
I'm assuming that the planning department will prepare the agenda item summaries.
Thanks
cc: Hilary Smith
Susan Murphy
Mark Fuller
John Ely
spec _dst\plan_mem_rec_d ist. doc
000016
000011
2, 2004
4: 04PNIO=
March 1, 2004
DREAMTIME WATER
0
Pitkin County Cemnrissioners
520 East Main
Aspen, Cc 81611
RE: W/J Metropolitan District
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
at 3/1/2004 6:09NO.529
This is to provide you with an endorsement of the W/J Metropolitan District Service Plan and to
ask that you approve this Service Plan so that a District Election can be scheduled for this
November's general election.
The W/J Homeowner's Association has been working with Lowe W/J on issues related to Lowe's
pending development of additional free-marketordable housing units on the W/J property.
This development requires upgrades to the roads facilities and water delivery system on the
Property. We have worked closely with Lowe to assure that these improvements will be integrated
into an overall reooiWitiction of area infrastructure. Under the District, Lowe win fund all of the
costs associated with new development while contributions from current homeowners will go
towards maintenance and long-term replacement costs associated with the upgraded amenities,
Thus the homeowners ctwerdly living within the proposed District boundaries will realize the
benefits of the improvements but will not bear any financial burden associated with the installation
Of those improvements.
We look forward to working with the District to create and maintain improved inflastructure for
the W/J neighborhood, Thank you for your consideration.
Yours truly,
Paul Jones
Title
For the W/J Homeowncr .Association
3
Date
FROM 970 920 7814 TO Preferred Customer 3/2/2004 4:13 PM Paoe 2
001/00:
Bud Eylar, 03:48 PM 3/25/04, W/J Metro District. Page 1 of 1
Reply -To: <bude@ci.aspen.co.us>
From: "Bud Eylar" <bude@ci.aspen.co.us>
To: "Lance Clarke \(E-mail\)" <lancec@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: W/J Metro District.
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:48:16 -0700
X -Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
Lance, I have reviewed the application and have the following comments:
The Metro District boundary appears to follow the centerline of McLain
Flats road. It should be made clear that the District has no right ore
responsibility for any operations or maintenance of the road. Pitkin County
will remain the owner of all the road right of way.
Any maintenance or operation of the district that necessitate encroachments
into the county road right of way will require review and approval of the
county before any work is permitted.
000018
Printed for Lance Clarke <lancec@co.pitkin.co.us> 3/25/04
0 0
Memorandum
To: Lance Clark, Community Development Department
From: Nancy MacKenzie, Environmental Health Department
Re: W/J Metropolitan District Service Plan
Parcel ID# 2643-223-00-006
Date: March 25, 2004
WATER SYSTEM
The water system regularly serves at least 25 year-round residents. It is defined as a
"Community Water System" and is regulated by the State. The Colorado Department of
Public Health and Environment's (CDPHE) Water Quality Control Division (WQCD) is
responsible for permitting and inspecting the community water system. They will need to
approve the adequacy, design and replacement schedule for the proposed water delivery
system.
WASTERWATER
The EPA has issued a Voluntary National Guideline for the Management of Onsite and
Clustered Wastewater Treatment Systems, commonly referred to as septic systems.
Properly managed systems can enhance the performance and reliability of these systems to
provide the level of treatment necessary to adequately protect public health and surface and
ground water quality. Adequately managed decentralized systems can provide an
alternative to centralized wastewater treatment systems. System failures are reduced as a
result of routine and preventive maintenance.
The Metropolitan District Service Plan being proposed is modeled after the EPA
Management Model 5 — "Responsible Management Entity (RME) Ownership". This model
specifies that program elements and activities for treatment systems are owned, operated,
and maintained by the RME, which removes the property owner from responsibility for the
system. The EPA Guideline states that this model is analogous to central sewerage and
provides the greatest assurance of system performance in the most sensitive
environments.
00001?
The Environmental Health Department recommends approval of the W/J
Metropolitan District Service Plan since Model 5 should help solve the problems with
the existing septic systems at W/J. Several lots have restraints: the neighbor's system is
on their lot or their system is on the neighbor's lot. The RME may reduce the likelihood of
disputes between property owners. The RME can more readily replace existing systems
with cluster systems when necessary.
Due to the quick turn around on this review I have not had time to look in detail at Table 1:
ISDS New Construction and Replacement. The replacement schedule and financial plan
should take into account that there might need to be more expenditures in the first few
years for modification and relocation of the septic systems. Replacement of failed systems
will be necessary. In addition, the district might want to determine how to accommodate
the desire of the current homeowners to add bedrooms to accommodate growing families.
They have not been able to remodel due to the constraints of their current septic systems.
The plan for septic systems only appears to address repair and replacement.
The first step should be to develop a master plan for the location of all the septic systems
for all the lots to accommodate current needs and to determine if future needs (increased
number of bedrooms) can be accommodated. The applicant is working with
Environmental Health on the master plan idea and a meeting with a representative from
Schmueser Gordon Myer Engineers is scheduled for tomorrow, March 26th
Many details can be addressed in the final rules and regulations once the District is
approved: does ownership of the system start at the tank or at the pipe coming out of the
house; who will bare the burden when one homeowner wants to add a bedroom that would
require replacement and or upgrade to an existing system, etc.
OTHER PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERNS
The service plan should consider including mosquito abatement measures to prevent
disease and virus transmission from mosquito bites. Measures could include education on
reducing mosquito habitat by eliminating standing water and not over -watering lawns and
gardens. Treating ponds and standing water with BTI, a natural bacteria that kills mosquito
larvae, is also an effective mosquito control.
000020
WHITE STAR RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Post Office Boa 296
Woody Creek, CO 81656
970.920-1825 FAX:970.920.1824
email:farver@sopris.net
March 30, 2004
Attn: Mr. Lance Clark
Pitkin County Commissioners
530 East. Main
Aspen, Co 81611
RE: W/J Metro District
Dear Commissioners:
This is to provide you with an endorsement of the W/J Metropolitan District
Service Plan from the White Star Ranch Homeowners' Association. White Star
'gas ;voikid closely with Lowe W/J and with the W/J Homeowners' Association
on the development of the W/J property and the associated District formation.
White Star has agreed to maintain the irrigated lands portion of the W/J property
upon incorporation of the free-market units as well as the adjacent 85 acres of
open space lands on the W/J properties into the White Star Homeowners'
Association. It is our understanding that these 85 acres of open space lands will
not be part of the Metropolitan District but will become part of the White Star
Ranch open space.
It is in our interest, as well as that of the neighborhood as a whole, for W/J
residential areas to have a well-functioning and professionally managed
infrastructure system. We feel that the Metro District is the proper mechanism
for achieving this and we urge you to approve the Service Plan so as to allow
establishment of the District to move forward in a timely fashion.
to Farver, President
Star Ranch Homeowners' Association
Cc'. James-DeFcancia
000021
t�
Y
Debe Nelson, 07:35 PM 4/19/04,Re: W/J Metro service plan Page 1 of 1
X -Sender: deben@finance
X -Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 19:35:19 -0600
To: Lance Clarke <lancec@ci.aspen.co.us>
From: Debe Nelson <deben@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Re: W/J Metro service plan
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
I looked at it this weekend. I also talked to Mark about it. I found it very difficult to analyze the
financial information as the supporting numbers are very scattered. It looks like everything is there. If
you add across the amounts in schedule 7, the average is 81,000 - this amount ties to table 9 on page 25.
Mark also said that they did not include any of the new development in the property tax numbers in their
estimates, but it is impossible for me to verify the numbers with the information given to me. It appears
that they are proposing a fixed mill levy. These can be very onerous in revaluation years. A couple of
years ago, the districts that had a fixed levy saw a 26% increase in revenue, however they had a decrease
in this years levy because the valuations declined. I have mentioned this to Mark - but since the district
is mostly affordable units, the homeowners will not be effected as free market units will be. I have
asked Mark to verify what's included in the assessed value. I'll let you know what I find out.
My overall impression was that this was a difficult proposal to read, things did not flow well.
Debe
At 03:47 PM 4/19/2004, you wrote:
IDebe- Do you or Tom Oken have any comments for BOCC ?
Debe Nelson
x5229
09002 ed Zr Lance Clarke <lancec@co.pitkin.co.us> 4/20/04
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
�C t
THROUGH: Cindy Hdl en, Community Development Director
FROM: Lance Clarke, Assistant Director
RE: W/J Ranch Metropolitan District Service Plan
DATE: April 14, 2004
SUMMARY: The Applicant is applying to create a Metropolitan District pursuant to the Colorado
Special District Act in order to provide a basic Service Plan for the W/J Ranch PUD/Subdivision. The
purpose of the District is to finance, construct, and manage various elements associated with the
development and use of the property within the District.
APPLICANT: W/J Metro District Organizing Committee, c/o Lowe W/J LLC
ATIVE: Mark Fuller
DISTRICT AND SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: The proposed District Corporate boundary is the
80+ acres that comprise the three existing affordable housing subdivision filings of the W/J Ranch, the
proposed two new filings (one for the proposed five new free-market lots, and one for the proposed
relocated and new affordable housing), the existing Ranch "homestead" parcel, and the common open
space.
BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS: The W/J Ranch currently has an existing private road
system, a private water system supplied by wells, and individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS). The
water system needs upgrading and many of the septic systems are failing or are of the age that failure is
imminent.
The Applicant states that the proposed District includes 52 existing residential units which will increase to
72 units at full proposed build out. Presently, the Homeowner's Association charges fees of
approximately $136 per unit per month to provide services that Pitkin County and the other associated
special districts (Aspen Fire Protection District, Aspen Valley Hospital, CMC, RFTA, etc.) do not
provide, such as: snow removal, street maintenance, water service. Owners are individually responsible
for maintenance/replacement of ISDS. The Applicant has stated it is the intent of the District to provide
water service, road maintenance, waste water/septic, trash collection, snowplowing, miscellaneous
landscaping/beautification/lighting for approximately the same $136 monthly cost to individual
affordable housing homeowners. It is projected the free-market units will have a service cost of $532 per
month.
REFERRAL COMMENTS:
• The application has been referred to the Environmental Health Department, the County Engineer,
The County Finance Director, The Woody Creek Caucus, and the W/J Homeowners Association.
000023
0 0
Unfortunately, the state -mandated turnaround time on Special District applications is such that
some of the referral agents have not been able to respond as of this date.
AUTHORITY: In accordance with the requirements of the Special District Act (CRS 32-1-101 et seq.),
the Planning Commission shall submit a recommendation on a special district service plan to the Board of
County Commissioners and the BOCC shall approve or deny such plan.
The County has the authority to approve the proposed district, if the following can be demonstrated,
pursuant to CRS 32-1-203, et seq.:
1. There is sufficient existing and projected need for organized service in the area to be served.
2. That existing service in the area to be serviced by the proposed district is inadequate for present and
projected needs.
3. The proposed district is capable of providing economical and sufficient service within its proposed
boundary.
4. The District has, or will have, the financial ability to discharge the proposed indebtedness on a
reasonable basis.
The County shall also consider the following:
I . Adequate service is not, or will not be, available to the area through the county or other existing
municipal or quasi -municipal corporations, including existing special districts, within a reasonable
time and on a comparable basis.
2. The facility and service standards of the proposed special districts are compatible with the facility and
service standards for each county within which the proposed special district is to be located and each
municipality which is an interested party.
3. The proposal is in substantial compliance with a master plan.
4. The proposal is in compliance with any duly adopted county, regional, or state long-range water
quality management plan for the area.
5. The creation of the proposed special district will be in the best interests of the area proposed to be
served.
LAND USE ISSUES:
Sufficient Need/Adequacy of Existing Service: The Applicant asserts that the current operation and
maintenance of the existing services provided by the Homeowner's Association, as well as needed
upgrades, expansions, and improvements, can be more effectively and efficiently provided by a
metropolitan district. The proposed Metro District would allow for the ability to incur debt to do the
improvements and retain better interest rates, and thus lessen the cost for the Homeowners.
Pitkin County has no future plan to provide for the operation, maintenance or improvements to the
existing services.
Financial Considerations: The proposed mill levy for the District is 48.5mills. The mill levy is estimated
based on the assessed value of the properties, and the cost of the proposed service plan.
1041 Review: Implementation of the service plan is subject to compliance with the applicable provisions
of Section 3-80 (1041 Environmental Hazard Areas) and Section 3-90-020 (Site Selection of Major New
Domestic Water and Sewage Treatment Systems and Major Extensions) of the Land Use Code.
000024
Compliance with Master Plans and County Policies: The Down Valley Comprehensive Plan ("DVCP")
contains the goals to "maintain a development pattern which preserves the rural character and high
quality environment which makes the Down Valley Area a desirable place to live and work," and to
"preserve the existing development pattern in which Snowmass Village, Aspen, and Basalt are separated
by rural areas." Improvement of services to the existing and proposed W/J Ranch development is not
inconsistent with these goals or the land use policies in the Code.
The Woody Creek Caucus Master Plan does not deal with the appropriateness of metro districts for the
area.
P&Z ACTION: The P&Z recommended approval of the District service plan by a 4-0 vote on March
30, 2004. The comments were all positive. Paul Rudnick expressed his continued concern that metro
districts allow a tax deduction for services not ordinarily provided by the County.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of
County Commissioners adopt a motion to approve the W/J Ranch Metropolitan District Service Plan m 1 st
Reading and set a 2nd Reading and Public Hearing for April 28, 2004.
ATTACHMENTS:
I.Clerk summary of actions
2. W/J Homeowners Assoc.
3. County Engineer comments
4. EHD comments
S.White Star Ranch comments
Application provided separately
P042-04
264322300006
lancec/wj metro dist. bocc memo.doc
000025
0 0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Lance Clarlfe; Assistant Director
RE: W/J Ranch Metropolitan District Service Plan
DATE: March 30, 2004
SUMMARY: The Applicant is applying to create a Metropolitan District pursuant to the Colorado
Special District Act in order to provide a basic Service Plan for the W/J Ranch PUD/Subdivision. The
purpose of the District is to finance, construct, and manage various elements associated with the
development and use of the property within the District.
APPLICANT: W/J Metro District Organizing Committee, c/o Lowe W/J LLC
ATIVE: Mark Fuller
DISTRICT AND SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: The proposed District Corporate boundary is the
80+ acres that comprise the three existing affordable housing subdivision filings of the W/J Ranch, the
proposed two new filings (one for the proposed five new free-market lots, and one for the proposed
relocated and new affordable housing), the existing Ranch "homestead" parcel, and the common open
space.
BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS: The W/J Ranch currently has an existing private road
system, a private water system supplied by wells, and individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS). The
water system needs upgrading and many of the septic systems are failing or are of the age that failure is
imminent.
The Applicant states that the proposed District includes 52 existing residential units which will increase to
72 units at full proposed build out. Presently, the Homeowner's Association charges fees of
approximately $136 per unit per month to provide services that Pitkin County and the other associated
special districts (Aspen Fire Protection District, Aspen Valley Hospital, CMC, RFTA, etc.) do not
provide, such as: snow removal, street maintenance, water service. Owners are individually responsible
for maintenance/replacement of ISDS. The Applicant has stated it is the intent of the District to provide
water service, road maintenance, waste water/septic, trash collection, snowplowing, miscellaneous
landscaping/beautification/lighting for approximately the same $136 monthly cost to individual
affordable housing homeowners. It is projected the free-market units will have a service cost of $532 per
month.
REFERRAL COMMENTS:
• The application has been referred to the Environmental Health Department, the County Engineer,
The County Finance Director, The Woody Creek Caucus, and the W/J Homeowners Association.
Unfortunately, the state -mandated turnaround time on Special District applications is such that
only the EHD has yet been able to respond.
000026
0 0
AUTHORITY: In accordance with the requirements of the Special District Act (CRS 32-1-101 et seq.),
the Planning Commission shall submit a recommendation on a special district service plan to the Board of
County Commissioners.
The County has the authority to approve the proposed district, if the following can be demonstrated,
pursuant to CRS 32-1-203, et seq.:
1. There is sufficient existing and projected need for organized service in the area to be served.
2. That existing service in the area to be serviced by the proposed district is inadequate for present and
projected needs.
3. The proposed district is capable of providing economical and sufficient service within its proposed
boundary.
4. The District has, or will have, the financial ability to discharge the proposed indebtedness on a
reasonable basis.
The County shall also consider the following:
1. Adequate service is not, or will not be, available to the area through the county or other existing
municipal or quasi -municipal corporations, including existing special districts, within a reasonable
time and on a comparable basis.
2. The facility and service standards of the proposed special districts are compatible with the facility and
service standards for each county within which the proposed special district is to be located and each
municipality which is an interested party.
3. The proposal is in substantial compliance with a master plan.
4. The proposal is in compliance with any duly adopted county, regional, or state long-range water
quality management plan for the area.
5. The creation of the proposed special district will be in the best interests of the area proposed to be
served.
LAND USE ISSUES:
Sufficient Need/Adequacy of Existing Service: The Applicant asserts that the current operation and
maintenance of the existing services provided by the Homeowner's Association, as well as needed
upgrades, expansions, and improvements, can be more effectively and efficiently provided by a
metropolitan district. The proposed Metro District would allow for the ability to incur debt to do the
improvements and retain better interest rates, and thus lessen the cost for the Homeowners.
Pitkin County has no future plan to provide for the operation, maintenance or improvements to the
existing services.
Financial Considerations: The proposed mill levy for the District is 48.5mills. The mill levy is estimated
based on the assessed value of the properties, and the cost of the proposed service plan.
1041 Review: Implementation of the service plan is subject to compliance with the applicable provisions
of Section 3-80 (1041 Environmental Hazard Areas) and Section 3-90-020 (Site Selection of Major New
Domestic Water and Sewage Treatment Systems and Major Extensions) of the Land Use Code.
000021
0 0
Compliance with Master Plans and County Policies: The Down Valley Comprehensive Plan ("DVCP")
contains the goals to "maintain a development pattern which preserves the rural character and high
quality environment which makes the Down Valley Area a desirable place to live and work," and to
"preserve the existing development pattern in which Snowmass Village, Aspen, and Basalt are separated
by rural areas." Improvement of services to the existing and proposed W/J Ranch development is not
inconsistent with these goals or the land use policies in the Code.
The Woody Creek Caucus Master Plan does not deal with the appropriateness of metro districts for the
area.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission forward a
recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners to approve the W/J Ranch Metropolitan District
Service Plan, subject to the following conditions:
Implementation of the service plan is subject to review and approval by the County, sulject to
compliance with the applicable provisions of Section 3.80 (1041 Environmental Hazard Areas) and
Section 3-90-020 (Site Selection of Major New Domestic Water and Sewage Treatment Systems
and Major Extensions) of the Land Use Code.
2. Amendments to the service plan, including any expansion of the service area, are subject to
review by the Planning and Zoning Commission and approval by the Board of County
Commissioners.
3. The District shall comply with The Aspen Fire Protection District's standards for waer supply and
hydrants for fire -fighting purposes.
Application provided separately
P042-04
264322300006
lancec/wj metro dist. pz memo.doc
000023
0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
c/o Lance Clarke
FROM: Silvia Davis/J3
RE: Service Plan — Proposed Formation of W/J Metropolitan District
DATE: March 3, 2004
A service plan for a proposed district was filed in my office today, March 2, 2004. The contact
person filing the service plan is Mark Fuller, 970-963-4959.
Per CRS 32-1-204(2), the clerk and recorder must deliver the service plan to the county planning
commission. In compliance with this statute, I am forwarding 6 service plans to you today. As
liaison for the planning commission, will you please deliver these to the proper persons. This
statute states that the planning commission has 30 days from the date of filing the plan to make a
recommendation to the board, which is by April 1s'.
I will talk to administration about the following:
1. Set Date for a Public Hearing. Schedule an agenda item (Packet due April 8, 4:00
PM) for the regular BOCC meeting of April 14, 2004. At this meeting the BOCC will
set a date for a public hearing within 30 days of April 14th (CRS 32-1-202). The
next regular meeting after April 14'" that satisfies this criteria is April 28th. (Statute
says "At the next regular meeting of the BOCC which is held at least 10 days after
the final planning commission action on the service plan, the BOCC shall set a day
for a public hearing on the service plan").
2. Public Hearing. Schedule an agenda item for public hearing for April 28, 2004
(packet material due April 22nd at 4:00 PM).
3. Publication. April 3rd issue of Aspen Times Weekly. For your information, statute
requires the BOCC to make publication of this hearing at least 20 days before the
hearing date [32-1-204(1)].
I'm assuming that the planning department will prepare the agenda item summaries.
Thanks
cc: Hilary Smith
Susan Murphy
Mark Fuller
John Ely
spec_dsflplan_mem_rec_d ist. doc
000029
L •S' \
DI f ICT
40 1
�.,
4P
i � \ b/ a r::' � �.t �•�5��' + �� /�
,� /�. �'� � 1� y1 •� '� ,,, � .,;;: ,y' � � it
Lowe W/J LLC
Full r Consulting Services
003x.,
E
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
Introduction
Service Plan
Intergovernmental Relations
Facilities and Programs
Phasing
Financial Summary
Operating and Maintenance Costs
Annual Report
Modification of Service Plan
Disclosure
Board of Directors
Appendix
000031 2
0
Page 3
Page 6
Page 17
Page 18
Page 18
Pagd 19
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 26
Page 26
Page 27
I. Introduction
1. Summary
This Service Plan is presented to support the formation of a Metropolitan District pursuant to
the Colorado Special District Act, CRS Section 32-1-101 et. seq. The District shall be named the
W/J Metropolitan District ("District"). The purpose of the District is to finance, construct and
manage various infrastructure elements associated with the development and use of property
within the District. Those elements will include, but are not limited to, roads, water delivery
systems, and wastewater disposal and treatment systems. The District will also provide snow
plowing, trash removal, landscaping and administrative services. In addition the District will
have the authority to carry out those duties and functions enabled by the legislation determining
Metropolitan District functions, specifically CRS Section 32-1-1001 and 32-1-1605, inclusive
The District shall have limited power of condemnation. The services to be provided by the
District are currently the responsibility of either individual homeowners (in the case of
wastewater disposal systems) or the Homeowner's Association (in the case of water and road
systems). Improvements to these systems associated with pending development of the W/J
property require a more comprehensive approach to system construction and management. The
District will provide professional design, construction, maintenance and management services
to the properties within the District while maintaining costs at levels equal to current
Homeowner's Association assessmews.
District revenues will be generated from several sources. Those sources will include a mill levy
on properties within the District, a monthly usage fee from District property owners, one-time
hook-up fees for water, developer contributions in the form of developer -funded expansion of
the existing water and road systems, improvements to and installation of septic systems, and
bond financing. Those revenues and the other elements of the finance plan are provided in detail
in Appendix 2, below.
The proposed W/J Metropolitan District is located in the Woody Creek neighborhood
approximately 5 miles northwest of the City of Aspen in Pitkin County, Colorado. Mott
specifically, the property is located on both sides of the McLain Flats Road and the Upper
Woody Creek Road and adjacent to the east end of the Upper Woody Creek (True Smith)
Bridge. The size of the District will be 80.749 acres and will include within its borders the W/J
Ranch Filings 1 through 5, Parcel 2, and common open space (the "District Property"). A legal
description and map of the District Property is included in Appendix 1, below. The property
within the District was originally platted as the W/J Ranch Employee Housing Project in 1990,
and has been subdivided over the years as housing of various types and lot sizes have been
developed on the original property. The current subdivision process, which is taking plate
concurrently with the development of this Service Plan, calls for the creation of five single-
family free-market residential lots, an affordable housing duplex, and various other changes in
lot lines to adjust previously platted and undeveloped parcels. The Land Use Application for the
property, titled WIJ PUD Application, contains the details of the current subdivision process.
This District Service Plan is being developed so that the District can be created concurrently
000032 3
with the creation of the subdivided land and so that redevelopment and improvement of District
infrastructure can begin immediately upon completion of the subdivision process.
A District is proposed as a means of financing development, maintenance and management of
the road, water and wastewater infrastructure of the District property. This proposal is aimed at
meeting several significant needs, including:
➢ Unified maintenance and management of the existing and future wastewater treatment
systems on the property
➢ Design, construction and maintenance of a high-quality road system internal to the property
➢ Safe and dependable potable water to the residents within the District.
The provision of these services will benefit the current and future residents of the District as
follows:
• Facilities will be designed, engineered, constructed and maintained by professional
practitioners with experience and training in their respective areas of expertise.
• The financial structure associated with the District will be comprehensive and also
professionally managed so that facilities and amenities can be planned, financed, and
managed within a predictable and transparent management structure.
• The County will be insulated against the effects of future infrastructure failures, such
as septic system failures or road repairs.
• The District will communicate regularly and on a predictable basis with the
homeowners so that the intentions and activities of the District will be well-
publicized and open to public discussion
• The District will act as a complementary association to the W/J Homeowners'
Association (the"Homeowner's Association"), which will thereby be free to work on
other amenities and communications among the homeowners.
• The District will provide a focal point for discussion and pursuit of amenities,
upgrades and improvements to the property within the District.
• The District will collect operating and debt service revenues in the form of property
taxes, which will be deductible for property owners within the District, thereby
providing tax benefits. Collection of property taxes through Pitkin County will also
improve collection efficiency by eliminating Homeowner's Association
responsibility for assessment collection.
• The District may be eligible for a share of statewide "specific ownership taxes" and
Colorado Trust Fund (lottery sales) distributions.
• The District will be eligible for lower interest rates than would be a private
Homeowner's Association should the District need to borrow money for future
improvements.
• The District's activities will fall under the protection of the Colorado Governmental
• Immunity Act, thereby reducing the liability exposure, and insurance costs, that
would otherwise fall to the Homeowner's Association.
000033 4
In the past, infrastructure within the District has been provided by the overall owners of the
property, the Homeowner's Association, or the County. The District will centralize and
consolidate infrastructure construction and maintenance, thereby providing all parties with a
simplified mechanism for addressing infrastructure needs
2. Organization
a.) Statutory Requirements
CRS 32-1-203, et seq., provides that proposed Metropolitan Districts must submit a
Service Plan to the County in which they are to be organized. The County Commissioners may
approve the Service Plan if it demonstrates the following:
➢ There is sufficient and future need for the services to be provided by the District
➢ Existing services within the proposed District are inadequate for future needs
➢ The proposed District is capable of providing services efficiently and effectively
➢ The District has the financial capability to provide services
➢ The District Service Plan is consistent with adopted state or local Master Plans relating
to land use, water quantity, water quality, or other relevant elements of the Service Plan
W Organizine Committee Members
James DeFrancia
David (Skip) Behrhorst
Stan Clauson
Phillip Whittingham
Paul Jones
c.) District Counsel
Robert M. Noone, Esq,
Robert M. Noone Law Offices, P.C.
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
d.) Financial and Bonding Consultants
Economic and Planning Systems
730 171h Street #630
Denver, Co 80202
e.) Plannine Consultant
Mark Fuller
Fuller Consulting Services
0238 Fawn Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
000034 5
The W/J Metro District Organizing Committee
c/o Lowe-W/J LLC
P.O. Box 12393
Aspen, Co 81612
II. Service Plan
1. Background
The W/J Metropolitan District is being formed to implement infrastructure design, construction,
management and maintenance within the District. District formation is being sponsored by
Lowe,W/J LLC ("Lowe"), the principal owner of the property, in cooperation with the
Homeowner's Association. The District property has been the subject of various subdivision
actions and development applications over the years. The current application addresses issues of
wildlife habitat preservation, viewplanes, density, traffic, and preservation of agricultural land.
The development proposal has been endorsed by the Woody Creek Caucus and the neighboring
White Star Ranch Homeowner's Association. The development would preserve approximately
183 out of the total of 203 acres in conservation easements and would develop the remaining 20
acres into either new single-family homesites or reconfiguration of existing homesites. Land to
be preserved would be in the form of either donations to Pitkin County or through a
conservation easement to be held by a land trust. A small area (17.16 acres) will be provided to
the Homeowner's Association in three separate parcels for purposes of open space and to
provide an expanded septic system/leach field envelope for adjacent homes. The proposed final
disposition of the land into its various components is shown in Appendix 2.
The District property has been through several ownerships and has been the subject of several
planning proposals over the past several years. In 1998, 778 units were proposed for
development on the property by the previous owner. This proposal was not approved by the
County, on the partial grounds of the proposal's inadequate addressing of infrastructure and
utility issues. The current proposal is a drastic downsizing of that proposal and takes a
comprehensive and thorough approach to utilities issues.
2. Location
The W/J property is located at Sections 21 and 22, Township 9 South, Range 85 West of the &
P.M. in unincorporated Pitkin County, Colorado. The property is located on two alluvial
terraces to the west of Highway 82 and the Roaring Fork River approximately 5 miles northwest
of the City of Aspen and it is accessed by McClain Flats Road and a several internal roads. The
area being proposed for inclusion in the District includes property which is currently owned by
Lowe and by private landowners whose property had been subdivided off from the original
landholdings through previous subdivision processes. The current ownership of land within the
proposed District is shown in Appendix 2. The area within the District is the only area to be
served by the District. There are no plans for the District to serve areas currently outside the
District Property. A map and legal description of the District boundaries is attached for
reference as Appendix 1.
000035
6
0 0
3. Need for Service
The area within the proposed District is in unincorporated Pitkin County and thus is not
eligible to receive services from any incorporated municipality. The District overlaps or is
contained within several other Special Districts, including the Pitkin County Library District,
the Aspen Volunteer Fire District and the Colorado River Water Conservation District. None of
these Districts provide infrastructure development or maintenance services such as those
proposed herein. Pitkin County does not provide water or sewage disposal services nor does it
construct or maintain private roads. Thus the only mechanism for providing the services
described below are through a Homeowner's Association or a Special District. Given the
pending development of the property and the infrastructure expansions and improvements
required by that development, a Special District is the only available mechanism to provide an
expanded and consistent funding base to build and maintain both existing and future
infrastructure. It is important to note that Lowe, as the developer of the property, will be solely
responsible for all development costs, including infrastructure construction and improvements
associated with property development. The District will subsequently be responsible for
maintenance of these improvements and for long-term infrastructure upgrades.
a.) Septic Systems
The properties and residences currently within the proposed District boundaries are served by
Individual Sewage Disposal Systems ("ISDS's", commonly referred to as septic systems). Most
of the septic systems serve a single residence but some septic systems serve more than one unit.
These septic systems are between 14 and 40 years old, having been installed when the units
were built between the mid -60's and 1990. Several of these systems have failed and been
replaced in the past several years while others have had ongoing performance and maintenance
problems. Systems replacement costs have been bome by individual property owners and
Pitkin County. According to the Engineering Report for the W/J Metropolitan District Service
Plan ("Engineering Report") prepared for Lowe W/J LLC by Water and Waste Engineering Inc,
(September, 2003), approximately 25 systems currently on the property are 30 years old or older
and will need to be replaced within the next ten years and 27 systems are at least thirteen years
old will need to be replaced within fifteen years. The total cost of these replacements over a
thirty year period has been estimated by the Engineering Report at approximately $1.6 million,
including engineering, design and contingency costs.
Several septic systems for existing residential units are currently shared, with two units sharing
a single tank or several tanks sharing a single leach field. Also several existing systems were
built on currently -vacant lots that were subdivided for individual residences other than those
served by those systems. These systems will need to be rebuilt so that they do not overlap or
interfere with the development of those vacant lots. The cost of this reconstruction is estimated
to be $130,800 and is included in the $1.6 million septic cost estimate noted above. The current
land use application provides for common open space which will be set aside for construction of
septic systems. These supplemental building envelopes are adjacent to the residential areas and
are shown in Appendix 3. These remedies will allow for buildout of the property according to
000036 7
the original and revised plats and will also enhance the useful life and efficiency of the existing
systems.
a.) Water System
The Engineering Report addresses the need for an enhanced water system to serve the District
Property. The existing water system consists of four wells drilled in the Roaring Fork alluvium, a
central pump station, a chlorine disinfection system, a 12 inch delivery main, a series of storage
tanks with a cumulative 66,000 gallon storage capacity, a booster pump station and a distribution
system consisting of 4, 6, and 8 inch lines. This system currently serves the existing 52 units
within the proposed District Property. The proposed development will add 10 units to that total
plus 10 additional undeveloped lots for a total of 72 existing and potential units to be served by the
system. It will be necessary to add two more wells to the four already in place to supply the needs
identified for the total residential development, including lawn irrigation. The additional wells
will increase the system's decreed delivery capacity from 336 gpm to 536 gpm. The new
development will also increase storage needs and will trigger the construction of a new storage
tank with a minimum capacity of 120,000 gallons. The exact capacity of the new storage tank will
depend on how much existing storage can be retained in the future system. This tank will boost
total maximum storage capacity to 186,000 gallons and will allow for 1,000 gpm fire flows.
The Engineering Report estimates the costs of the new wells, the reconstructed storage system and
the associated system elements to be $1,123,335. This system will include the new wells and
associated pumps, a reconfigured storage facility capable of storing 186,000 gallons or more; and
a reconstructed distribution system, including piping, valves, fire hydrants and service taps. The
location of the major water system components is shown in Appendix 4.
The 30 -year replacement schedule for the water system estimates a current cost of $619,576 for
replacement of various elements of the system. This schedule includes engineering and
contingency costs. The Engineering Report also estimates a cost of $43,000 per year for water
system operations. This estimate includes billing and administration, water quality testing, electric
power costs and routine annual system maintenance and replacement.
b.) Road System
The existing road system within the District Property consists of a paved asphalt road serving
Filing 1 and paved chipseal roads serving Filings 2 and 3. The existing roads are shown in
Appendix 5. The District proposes to construct and maintain all of the new roads in the
redeveloped areas of the District Property. Lowe will pay the installation costs of those roads
which are described in greater detail below. The total cost of new road maintenance and additional
construction is estimated to be $256,665. This cost will be home entirely by the District. The new
road system has been approved through the County land use review process and it is anticipated
that the installation of the roads will be made a condition of approval of the new development.
The District will also be responsible for annual maintenance of the internal road system at an
annual cost of approximately $2,100 per year.
000031 8
9 0
d. Other District Activities and Services
The W/J Metropolitan District will carry out other maintenance and upkeep tasks related to the
District Property in addition to the major work elements noted above. These tasks will include
pedestrian trail development, trash collection, snow plowing, landscaping, maintenance of
common lighting elements such as streetlights and pedestrian trail lighting, and general
beautification, safety and informational projects such as entry gates, street signs, crosswalks and
fencing. The precise extent, location and costs of such activities has not been quantified, although
an average annual cost of $81,800 for routine maintenance has been developed. This estimate is
detailed in Section VII, below.
Under Colorado Statutes, a Metropolitan District is authorized to carry out a wide variety of
activities related to urban development, including development and maintenance of parks,
recreation facilities, storm drainage facilities, emergency services, and management of sports and
recreation programs. The District has no current plans to provide these services but retains the
right and the authority to undertake these functions at some point in the future. Should these tasks
be undertaken in the future, the District will revise and amend this Service Plan to reflect those
changes.
4. Proposed District Services
The District is being formed with the intent of carrying out the following tasks and services. These
tasks and services are outlined here on the understanding that specific details regarding
construction, scheduling, materials and methods, and the rules and regulations regarding District
and landowner responsibilities, will be determined by the District Board following District
formation. The District will undertake to address the needs outlined above as follows:
a). Wastewater & Septic Service
The proposed wastewater management system will also consist of soil absorption Individual
Sewage Disposal Systems ("ISDS") for each residence. The proposed wastewater plan will reserve
supplemental land to the west of Filing I, Filing 2 and Filing 4 that may be the future site of leach
fields for use by residences on these filings. Some of the lots in Filing 1 and 2 are too small to
accommodate properly -sized leach fields so this additional space, which will otherwise be
restricted to open space, is being made available for use by those lots. The proposed supplemental
wastewater management areas are shown in Appendix 3. All ISDSs serving Filing 3 and the free
market lots will be placed within the boundaries of the individual lots. All ISDS's will be designed
and built to the standards and requirements of the Colorado Department of Health and the Pitkin
County Environmental Health Department.
New Construction and Replacement
Table 1, below includes summaries of the estimated costs for the replacement of ISDS's as needed
for the District for the next 30 years. All costs are in terms of July 2003 dollars and include a 15%
allowance for final design and construction engineering and a 20% contingency.
Operation and Maintenance
The operation and maintenance costs will consist of regular pumping of each septic tank once
000033 9
O
O
O
CO
W
Table 1: ISDS Reconstruction and Replacement
Total
(I) MDS- Ind lvidust Sewage Disposal System
(2) Emectadl Idea. of an ISDS Is 25 yeah
(3) The replacement of existog ISDS assurnea the exvtmg ISOS is atxvidonad in pace except n Hing 2, as ircomW
$1,188,000 $399,450 $1,587,450
•
•
Acnoa
Eng'g &
Item Description
years)
Units
Unit Cost
Qty
Sub -Total
Cont,gs
Total
Comments
I Filing I
1.1 Replace ISDS for 8 "Duplex. Lots
0 to 10
EA
$21,80C
8
$174,40C
$61,
$235,440
Existing ISM -30 years old
1.2 Replace ISDS for 27 "Modular" Lots
10 to 15
EA
$21,8
2
$588,60C
$206,010
$794,610
Existing ISDS 13 years old
Subtotal
$763,000
$267,050
$1,030.050
11 Filing
11.1 Replace ISDS for Lot 21.22. 25 and 30
0 to 3
EA
$21,8
5
$109,06C
S21,80C
$130,800
ISDS for Lots 21. 22.25 and 30 arc located on
Lots 23.24. 31. 32. Cost Includes a 20%
Contingency only. ISDS design for these lots is
Complete.
11.2 Remove existing septic systems on Lots 23, 24. 31 and 32
0 to 3
LS
$10,800
1
$10,800
$3,780
$14,58
11.3 Replace ISDS for Lot 33
0 to 10
EA
$21,800
1
S21,800
$7,630
$29,430
Existing ISDS -30 years old
11 4 Replace ISDS for Lot 26
25
EA
$21,800
I
$21,80
$7,630
$29,43
Existing ISDS -2 years old
Subtotal
$163,40C
S40,940
$204.24
III Filing 3
111.1 Replace ISDS for 8 existing lots
0 to 10
EA
$21,80C
8
$174,40C
S61,040
S235.440
Existing ISDS -30 years old
111.2 Replace ISDS for Lot 2
25
EA
$21,80C
1
S21,800
$7,630
$29,430
Existing ISDS -3 years old
Subtotal
9
S196,200
$68,670
$264,87
IV Parcel2
IV. I Replace ISDSs for 3 buildings on Parcel 2
0 to 10
EA
$21,80C
3
$65,40C
$22,89
$88,29
Total
(I) MDS- Ind lvidust Sewage Disposal System
(2) Emectadl Idea. of an ISDS Is 25 yeah
(3) The replacement of existog ISDS assurnea the exvtmg ISOS is atxvidonad in pace except n Hing 2, as ircomW
$1,188,000 $399,450 $1,587,450
•
•
0 0
every 2 years at a cost of $500 per pumping. The average annual operation and maintenance costs
for each ISDS will thus be approximately $250 per year. Other unforeseen maintenance costs will
be assumed by the District. The District will maintain a maintenance fund to be funded by the
initial bond issue of $290,000 to cover such costs.
b.) Road Systems Services
The existing road system within the District Property consists of a paved asphalt road serving
Filing 1 and paved chip -seal roads serving Filing 2 & 3 as shown in Appendix 5. The separate
filings are located and mapped in Appendix 6.
The proposed development will include the construction of a new road associated with the revised
Filing 2 and Filing 4. This road will consist of approximately 1,200 feet of 24 -foot wide asphalt
paved road including 4 cul-de-sac turnaround areas. The existing gravel roads serving Filing 2 will
be abandoned and reclaimed for either open space or development purposes depending on their
location in relation to the new development. The entrance to Filing 2 from the McLain Flats Road
will be rebuilt at the same location as the current entrance.
The free market element of the development will require the construction of 3,600 feet of asphalt
paved roads to serve the 5 new free-market units and to create a new entrance and access road to
the Filing 3 residences. The current entry point to Filing 3 off of the McLain Flats Road will be
left as it is. That entrance will continue to serve the new free market units and the remainder of
Filing 3 and the balance of the existing road will be realigned.
Road maintenance will consist of patching and sealing of asphalt as may be necessary from time to
time. In addition, the District will be responsible for re -paving the roads according to a schedule to
be drawn up by the District. The cost of the annual patching and sealing work is estimated to be
approximately 1% of the equivalent full replacement costs. Thus, the annual average road
maintenance expense is estimated to be $2,100/year.
Table 2, below includes summaries of the estimated costs for the construction and replacement of
roads as may be needed for the next 30 years. All costs are in terms of July 2003 dollars and
include a 15% allowance for final design and construction planning.
CD
0
O
O
Table 2: Road Construction and Repairs
Total
Notes
(1) Action year is the year in which the work is done starting with 2003 a year O. (2)
Assumes 24-R road width for all roads except Stevens Way
(3) Design Life of Asphalt Road is 20 years
(4) Installed by Developer
$190,122 $66,543 $256,665
•
u
Action
Unit
Eng'g &
item Description
Year(s)l
Units
Cost
Qty
Sub -Total Corigs Total
Comments
I Filing 1
1.1 Repair of Stevens Way
7
SY
$1.50
5.680
$8,520 $2,982 $11,50
1.2 Y' Asphalt overlay of Stevens Way (20 -Ft Road Width)
17
SY
S6.00
5.680
$34,080 $11,928 $46,00
1.3 Repair of Stevens Way
27
SY
$1.50
5.680
$8,520 $2,982 $11,50
Subtotal
$51,120 $17,892 $69,01
II Filing
11.1 .Asphalt paving of Lower Bullwinkle (4)
0-3
SY
1'3,429
$o $0 so
11.2 Repair of Lower Bullwinkle
10
SY
$1.5
3.4
$5,144 ' $1,800 $6,944
11.3 2" Asphalt overlay of Lower Bullwinkle
20
S
$6.0
3.42
$20,574 $7,201 $27,77
11.4 Repair of Lower Bullwinkle
30
S
$1.5
3.429
$5,144 $1,800 $6,944
Subtotal
$30,861 $10,801 $41,66
III Filing 3
111.1 Asphalt paving of Upper Bullwinkle (4)
0-3
SY
$15.DO
1.3
$0 $0 $0
519 LF of U Bullwinkle currently exists
11.2 Repair of Upper Bullwinkle
10
SY
$1.50
2.821
$4,232 $1,481 $5,71
11.3 Y' Asphalt overlay of Upper Bullwinkle
20
SY
$6.00
2.821
$16,926 $5,924 $22,85
IIA Repair of Upper Bullwinkle
30
SY
$1.50
2.821
$4,232 $1,481 $5,713
Subtotal
$25,389 $8,886 $34,27
IV Free Market
IV. i Gravel surfacing of Free Market Road (4)
0-3
S
$g.
6,8
$0 $0 $
IV.2 Repair of Free Market Road
10
SY
$2.
6.8
$13,792 $4,827 $18,61
IV.3 Repair of Free Markel Road
20
SY
$8.
6.896
$55,168 $19,309 $74,47
IVA Repair of Free Market Road
30
SY
$2.
6.96
513,792 $4,821 $18,61
Subtotal
$82,752 $28,963 8111,715
Total
Notes
(1) Action year is the year in which the work is done starting with 2003 a year O. (2)
Assumes 24-R road width for all roads except Stevens Way
(3) Design Life of Asphalt Road is 20 years
(4) Installed by Developer
$190,122 $66,543 $256,665
•
u
0 0
c.) Water System
The existing water system consists of 4 wells drilled in the Roaring Fork alluvium, a central pump
station, a chlorine disinfection system, a 12 -inch delivery main, a 66,000 gallon storage system, a
booster pump station and a distribution system of variously sized lines. Appendix 4 illustrates the
major components of the system. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
(CDPHE) has assigned the system an identification number of 149844 in the name of Lowe W/J
LLC. The system has passed all relevant quantity and quality tests and standards imposed by the
State.
The existing system provides water to the 65 existing dwelling units and lots in Filings 1,2, and 3
and Parcel 2. This system is approved to serve up to 75 units. The development proposal currently
before Pitkin County would increase the number of units being served by seven units, an
affordable housing duplex, and 5 large estate free market units for a total of 72 units. Table 3,
below illustrates the total demand on the water system under the final development scenario. This
estimate assumes a population of 3.5 people per unit, 100 gal.of use per person per day for
domestic and personal use and 4.3 acres of landscape irrigation. Annual irrigation demands are
estimated to be 2.45 af/acre with a peak day demand of .75 inches (.0625 af/acre). It is noted that
irrigation responsibility for the agricultural/open space land included in the W/J property will not
be the responsibility of the District. It is anticipated that these lands will be placed under a
conservation easement and merged with adjacent White Star Ranch open space for management
and irrigation purposes.
TABLE 3
POTABLE WATER SYSTEM DEMANDS
(Assume 72 units x 3.5 personstunit)
Category
Number
Unit Flow
Total
Avg Annual Flow
In House
252 people
100 gal./day
28.22 af/year
Potable Irrigation
4.3 acres (2500 sf x 72 lots)
2.45 af/acre
10.12 af/year
TOTAL
38.34 af/year
Avg, Winter Day Flow
In House
252 people
100 Gal./day
0.077 af/day
Potable Irrigation
4.3 acres
0.0 af/acre
0.00 af/day
TOTAL
.077 af/day or
17.5 gal/min
Average Summer Flow
In House 252 people 100 gpd .077 af/day
Potable Irrigation 4.3 acres .0625 af/acre .258 af.day
TOTAL .335 af/day
127,000 gal/day
75.8 gal/min
of = acre-feet; gal/day = gallons per day; gal/minute = gallons per minute
Potable water will be supplied by 6 wells drilled into the Roaring Fork alluvium. As noted, four of the
wells are currently in place and in operation. A fifth existing well was transferred to Pitkin County
ownership and a replacement well will be drilled in closer proximity to other
13
000042
water storage and distribution infrastructure. All five wells existing are permitted for domestic,
commercial, irrigation, fire protection, aesthetic and agricultural purposes. Table 4, below
summarizes the characteristics and capacity of each well. Wells 1 through 4 are currently in
operation and producing sufficient water to meet the 88 gpm maximum demand illustrated above.
TABLE 4
Lowe W/J Potable Water Well System
Name
Permit #
Adjudication
Appropriation Decreed 1999 Pump Test
Date Date Capacity
Capacity
Jaffee #1
11279-F
12/31/72
10/27/66
50
25
Jaffee #2
11278-F
12/31/72
10/01/66
45
30
Jaffee #3
42395-F
12/31/90
8/24/87
112
85
Jaffee #4
42397-F
12/31/90
8/24/87
75
14
Jaffee #5
pending
12/31/90
8/24/87
54
0
TOTAL
336
154
The Roaring Fork alluvium has historically been an excellent source for potable water. Treatment
with chlorine to meet health standards is expected to be the only treatment necessary for the
foreseeable future. The system is currently operated by Mr. Scott Leslie under a service contract
with Environmental Process Control, Inc.
Four existing underground potable water storage tanks with a total capacity of 66,000 gallons are
located in Filing 3. These tanks provide gravity service to Filings 1 and 2, while a booster pump
delivers water from these storage facilities to Filing 3.
Future storage requirements will include capacity for a 1,000 gpm/2 hour fire flow (120,000
gallons) plus a '/2 day peak demand capacity of 63,000 gallons. The total capacity required is
186,000 gallons. A new storage tank sufficient to guarantee that additional capacity will be
constructed in the vicinity noted in Appendix 4.
The final size of the new tank will be determined based on an analysis of the future use of the
existing storage system. Some or all of the existing storage tanks may be rebuilt or dismantled if
that analysis shows that it would not be cost-effective to keep them in service due to their age,
condition or associated infrastructure. In any case, the completed water delivery system will be
designed and built to meet the requirements noted above as well as all other water delivery
requirements of the development.
000043 14
Table 5: W/J Ranch Water System New Construction Costs
Subtotal $180,000 563,000 $243,000
•
Total $832,100 $291,235 $1,123,335 0
05/27/0:
Action
Eng'g &
I
Item Description
Yews)
Units
Unit Cwt
Qty
sub -Total
Coorgs
TOW
commmu,
I Distribution
1.1 8" DIP
0.3
LF
S80
3,
$312,000
S I D9,200
S421,200
Serves all lots in F2, F3. free market and Parcel 2
1.2 8" Gate Valve
0-3
EA
$750
1
$13,500
54,72
$IU25
Smes all lots in F2. F3. free market and Parcel 2
I.3 Fre Hydrants
0.3
EA
$3,0
13
$39,000
$13.65C
$52,650
Servtti all lots in F2, F3. free market and Parcel 2
1.4 Service Taps and 3/4" Meters
0-3
EA
$2.2
3
$83,600
$29,260
$112,860
Serves all lots in F2, F3. free market and Parcel 2
Subtotal
5448,1
$156,835
$604,93
II Storage
11.1 183.000 -gallon tank
0.3
LS
$204,0
1
$204,
$71,400
$275,400
Replaces existing storage tanks
Subtotal
$204,000
$71,400
$275,400
III Wells/Pumpa
111.1 Service Booster Pump
0-3
EA
$45.000
1
S45,00HO
$15,75
560,73
:mes F3 and Gee market lots
1I1,2 Are Booster Pump
0.3
EA
5120,0
f
$ 120,
542,00
5162,
Serves F3 and free market lots
111.3 Pum House and urtenences
03
EA
S15,00
1
513
$5x
$20 5
Subtotal $180,000 563,000 $243,000
•
Total $832,100 $291,235 $1,123,335 0
05/27/0:
CD
0
0
0
4'-
01
Table 6: W/J Ranch Water System 30 year Replacement Schedule
Subtotal $291,875 S394,031
Total
Notes:
(1) Amon you is the veer in which the wort'o done mining with 2003 w veer D.
(2) DIP - Duailc imn pipe
(3) STL - Steel pipe
5458,945 $102,156 5619,576
Ll
Action
Eng g &
Item Description
Year(s)
Units
Unit Cost
Qty
Sub -Total Conigs
Total
Comments
I Distribution
LI Service taps, curb stops and meters for Fl
EA
S2,20C
35
S77,000 $26,950
$103,950
1.2 4" DIP to replace 4" PVC serving Fl cul -0e -sacs
9.10
LF
$67
7
$50,920 $17,822
S68,742
1.3 4" DIP to replace 15" STL serving FI, Lots 13-20
9-I2
EA
$67
400
526,800 $9.380
$36,190
Su total
5154,720 554,152
5208,87
II Storage
11.1 Control cabloconduit
25
LF
$
1,40
$11,200 $3,920
$15,120
11.2 Level sensors
7, 17,27
LS
$1,15
1
$1,150 $403
$1,553
submittal
512,350 $4,323
516,673
III Wells?umps
III Pump controls
12,27
EA
$1,250
5
$6,250 $2,188
$8,438
111.2 Flowmeters
12,27
EA
S85
5
$4,250 $1,488
$5,738
111.3 BaMow prevemors
17
EA
S71h
10
57,800 $2,730
510,530
I 11 A Miscellaneous taps, bends, tees, mc.
17
LS
$2,
1
$2,600 $910
$3,510
111.5 Gate valves
17
EA
S4
10
54,000 $1,400
55,400
111.6 Chlorination system
12,27
LS
$7,1
1
57,100 52,485
$9,585
1117 4" DIP well piping for Well No 1, 2, 3, 4
10-18
LF
Sb
625
$41,875 $14,656
$56,531
111.8 Well pumps for Wells No. 1,2,3,4
7
EA
$5,
4
$20,000 $7,000
$27,000
111.9 Well pump for Well No.5
3
EA
$5,00
1
$5,000 $1,750
$6,750
111.10 Construct new Well No.5
3
LS
$20,
1
$20,000 57,000
S27,000
includes piping to pump house
111.11 Rehabilitate Wells No. t, 2, 3, 4
I8-22
LS
$12,
4
$48,000 $16,800
$64,800
111.12 Lower pump house reconstruction
20
LS
$15,
1
$15,000 55,250
520250
111.13 Booster pumps repair
10
LS
S40,
I
540,000 514,000
S54,000
111.14 Booster pumps overhaul
20
LS
560,00
1
560,000 521,000
581,000
111.15 Upper pump house rehabilionion
30
LS
510,00
1
$10,000 $3,5001
$13,500
Subtotal $291,875 S394,031
Total
Notes:
(1) Amon you is the veer in which the wort'o done mining with 2003 w veer D.
(2) DIP - Duailc imn pipe
(3) STL - Steel pipe
5458,945 $102,156 5619,576
Ll
d.) Water Rights
An augmentation plan for the Lowe W/J water system was decreed in Case # 90CW139, Colorado
District Court, Water Division No 5. As per that plan, out of priority diversions by Lowe W/J are
augmented through a water allotment contract with the Basalt Water Conservancy District, which
delivers water from Ruedi Reservoir according the demand. That contract augments a total annual
depletion of 13.5 acre feet (af). The approved plan assures a reliable water supply, by way of the
wells, to 75 residential units, irrigation of 4.3 acres of lawn and garden and stock watering for 130
head of livestock. Lowe has also applied to the water court for miscellaneous additional water
rights, including another well, in Case # 01CW151.
e.) Water System Costs
Tables 5 and 6, below, summarize the estimated costs of construction and replacement of water
system components for the next 30 years. All costs are in terms of July 2003 dollars and include a
15% allowance for final design and construction engineering and a 20% contingency.
5. Population Trends
The Population within the District is a function of the number residential units within the proposed
District boundaries. As noted above, the District is currently the site of 52 residential units, with
that number proposed to go to 72 units at full build -out. The current population within the District
is approximately 182 assuming an average occupancy of 3.5 persons per unit. At this occupancy
rate, the total population of the district can be expected to increase to approximately 252 people at
full buildout.
6. District Organization
The District will be organized according to the provisions of Title 32, Article 1, Colorado Revised
Statutes, and any other applicable laws and regulations. The District will be managed by a five -
person board of directors who will be elected at large according to applicable statutes and
regulations. It is anticipated that a slate of directors will be proposed for inclusion on the ballot
which will also be the venue for District Organization. The Board will exercise all powers and
authority granted to the District by the law and will conduct its operations in accordance with
statutory requirements.
I. Intergovernmental relations
The District will coordinate its activities and operations with those of Pitkin County and other
government agencies and jurisdictions to the extent that such coordination will be necessary in
order to carry out the District's obligation, be mutually beneficial, or be required by applicable
statutes or regulations. The District boundaries do not overlap with those of other Special Districts
with similar authority, although the District is wholly within the Aspen School District, the Aspen
Volunteer Fire District, the Colorado River Water Conservation District and several other Districts
with specific and non -conflicting purposes. The District will obtain all necessary land use and
building permits from Pitkin County prior to undertaking projects or construction in connection
with the District's obligations and in accordance with the activities of the District as approved in
this Service Plan. The District will coordinate annually with the County Assessor and County
Clerk to assure that property taxes are collected and delivered to the District according to
established procedures.
17
00004G
0 0
H. Facilities and Programs
1. General Responsibilities
The District has the following general responsibilities:
To design, construct, manage and maintain the water delivery system within the District
boundaries
➢ To design, construct, manage and maintain septic and sewage facilities within the
District
➢ To design, construct, manage and maintain the road system within the District
➢ To design, construct, manage and maintain other common elements and services within
the District including lighting, landscaping, trash removal and snow removal
2. Facilities
The District will own and maintain the facilities and equipment described above. Those facilities
will be further described and detailed in engineering plans and specifications that will be
submitted for review by the Pitkin County building department prior to construction. Facilities
will include water and storage pipelines, tanks, pumps, wells and associated structures; septic
tanks, leach field piping and associated pumps and valves; road structures; irrigation facilities;
various vehicles and power equipment; signs, lights and assorted miscellaneous equipment.
1. Programs
The District will carry out construction and maintenance programs as may be required to carry out
the responsibilities and to provide the primary services listed above, specifically the design,
construction, maintenance and management of wastewater, potable water and road systems
associated with build out of the District Property. The District will not implement programs
associated with other purposes authorized under Colorado statute unless this Service Plan is
amended to address such programs.
III. Phasing
The District intends to install upgrades to the roads, water and wastewater systems as may be
required in association with development and redevelopment of the residences on the District
Property and the associated affordable housing areas. Tables 1,2, 5 & 6, above note the life
expectancy of the various elements of the water, wastewater and road systems and the anticipated
costs of replacing those elements. The District anticipates replacing infrastructure elements as may
be necessary on the assumption that the replacement schedule will be consistent with those tables.
IV. Financial Summary
This section describes the general nature, basis, method of funding, debt and mill levy limitations
associated with the District's activities. Table 7 details District Cash Flow for the first ten years of
District activity and Table 8 shows Future Cash Flow. Further details of projected construction
and replacement costs are available if required.
18
000047
0 0
1. General Assumptions
• Annual Market appreciation of 3%
• Free Market values of $2.25 million for undeveloped lots and $7.5 million for developed
lots
• Value of $700,000 for Resident -Occupied affordable units
• Reserve Interest Rate of 4%
• Bond value of $290,000 amortized over 30 years at 6.5% interest with an annual debt
service payment of $25,000
• $2,000 water interconnection fee for affordable units and $6,000 fee for free
market units
• Monthly flat service fee of $70/month for affordable units and $210/month for free
market units
• Annual property tax levy of 48.5 mills/unit
• Annual inflation rate of 3%
2. Cash Flow Projection(s)
The detailed cash flow projection(s) for the District are shown in the Table 7, below. Lowe, as the
developer, will contribute to the District by expanding the water system and installing the new
roads associated with property development. The total value of these improvements is estimated to
be $1.8 million. A revenue bond of $290,000 to fund initial reserves will be issued in 2004 to be
repaid over 30 years.
Ongoing revenues for the District will come from an ad valorem property tax of 48.5 mills to be
levied on properties within the District. In addition, newly -constructed properties within the
District will be assessed a one-time interconnection fee and monthly maintenance fees. Total use
fees for the affordable units will average $136/month or roughly equal to the current
Homeowner's Association fees. Cost assumptions include costs for ISDS system replacement,
water system and road maintenance, snow and trash removal, common area lighting and
landscaping.
000043 19
O
O
O
O
Table 7
Cash Flow
W/J Ranch Feasibility Study (October 2003) Mlfl Rate 48.5
All revenues end costa initiated at 3% annually.
° Developar inslsllina water system and made: Metro Die ldct will maintaln.
° Monthly Fiat Fee • $70 affordable
$210 free market
'
Mill Rate = 48.5
° Hook up fee • S2,000 affordable
$8,000 free market
° Intereel on reaerva•4%
Year 0
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Water System & Roadways 2
$1,759,390
Revenue'
Bondissuance
$0
$290,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Flat Fee 3
$0
$0
$47,586
$53,469
$65,170
$76,580
$81,288
$83,726
$86,238
$88,825
$91,490
Property Taxes °
$0
$0
$118,479
$118,479
$151,769
$151,769
$235,207
$235,207
$260,957
$260,957
$265,802
Hook up fee °
$0
$2,060
$10,609
$8,742
$11,255
$6,956
$9,552
$12,299
$5,067
$5,219
$5.376
Total Revenue
$0
$292,060
$176,674
$180,690
$228,194
$235,304
$326,048
$331,233
$352,262
$355,001
$362,668
Costs'
Capital Costs
Leach Fields
$0
$30,699
$94,4e3
$125,472
$99,371
$102,352
$140,564
$108,586
$74,562
$76,799
$79,103
Other Capital Costs
$0
$60,000
$21,218
$58,734
$22,510
$23,185
$23,881
$49,263
$0
$89.693
$163,227
Operations & Maintenance
Leach Fields
$0
$0
$0
$17,757
$19,978
$20,867
$21,493
$22,138
$22,802
$23,486
$24,190
Other O&M
$0
$16,376
$34,747
$53,683
$73,725
$94,921
$97,769
$100,702
$103,723
$106,835
$110,040
Subtotal
$0
$107,075
$150,427
$255,647
$215,584
$241,326
$283,707
$280,688
$201,087
$296,812
$376,560
Debt Service
$0
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
Bond Formation & Reserve
$40,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
NO[
$0
$144,985
$1,247
-$99,957
-$12,391
-$31,022
$17,341
$25,545
$126,175
$33,189
-$38,892
Reserve °
$0
$150,784
$158,112
$60,482
$50,015
$19,752
$38,577
$66,686
$200,576
$243,115
$212,392
All revenues end costa initiated at 3% annually.
° Developar inslsllina water system and made: Metro Die ldct will maintaln.
° Monthly Fiat Fee • $70 affordable
$210 free market
'
Mill Rate = 48.5
° Hook up fee • S2,000 affordable
$8,000 free market
° Intereel on reaerva•4%
CD
0
0
0
r, -t
CZ)
Table 6
Future Cash Flow
W/J Ranch Feasibility Study (October 2003)
Year
Fee
Revenue'
Property
taxes'
Hook up
Fees 4
0&M
Leach Fields
O&M
Bond
Payments
Capital
Expenditures 1
Net Balance
Year 10
$212,392
Year11
$94,235
$265,802
$8,305
$113,341
$24,916
$25,000
$122,214
$307,074
Year 12
$97,062
$281,990
$8,555
$116,741
$25,664
$25,000
$179,908
$361,263
Year 13
$99,974
$281,990
$8,811
$120,244
$26,434
$25,000
$150,411
$447,147
Year 14
$102,973
$299,163
$9,076
$123,851
$27,227
$25,000
$154,924
$548,452
Year 15
$106,062
$299,163
$9,348
$127,566
$28,043
$25,000
$159,571
$647,757
Year 16
$109,244
$317,382
$9,628
$131,393
$28,885
$25,000
$141,680
$787,336
Year 17
$112,521
$317,382
$9,917
$135,335
$29,751
$25,000
$256,672
$811,613
Year 18
$115,897
$336,711
$10,215
$139,395
$30,644
$25,000
$150,308
$966,252
Year 19
$119,374
$336,711
$7,014
$143,577
$31,563
$25,000
$131,618
$1,141,496
Year 20
$122,955
$357,216
$0
$147,884
$32,510
$25,000
$291,781
$1,169,472
Year 21
$126,644
$357,216
$0
$152,321
$33,485
$25,000
$180,821
$1,312,173
Year22
$130,443
$378,971
$0
$156,891
$34,490
$25,000
$31,041
$1,637,132
Year 23
$134,356
$378,971
$0
$161,597
$35,525
$25,000
$0
$2,005,471
Year24
$138,387
$402,050
$0
$166,445
$36,590
$25,000
$0
$2,410,588
Year 25
$142,539
$402,050
$8,375
$171,439
$37,688
$25,000
$154,898
$2,677,508
Year 26
$146,815
$426,535
$0
$176,582
$38,819
$25,000
$0
$3,130,876
Year27
$151,219
$426,535
$0
$181,879
$39,983
$25,000
$81,779
$3,515,188
Year28
$155,756
$452,511
$0
$187,336
$41,183
$25,000
$0
$4,024,734
Year 29
$160,429
$452,511
$0
$192,956
$42,418
$25,000
$0
$4,552,392
Year 30
$165,241
$480,069
$0
$198,744
$43,691
$25,000
$108,683
$5,014,447
All revenues and coals Inflated at 3% annually,
= Monthly Flat Fee=
$70
affordable
$210
free market
' Mill Rete =
48.5
'Hook uo fee
52,000
affordable
•
0
3. Debt Issuance
0
The District intends to issue an initial revenue bond in the amount of $290,000 to support the
construction of various aspects of the infrastructure improvements noted herein. Refimdable
bonds may be issued by the District to defense original issue bonds in accordance with
applicable law.
4. District Revenue
The mill levy to support debt and operating expenses is expected to be 48.5 mills per residence.
The District will also collect monthly fees from both affordable and free market units and one-
time sewer and water hook-up fees.
5. Security for Debt
The District will not pledge any funds, assets or credit of the local jurisdictions or of private
parties outside of District boundaries as security for indebtedness. The local jurisdictions will
not bear any responsibility for District debt.
6. Revenue projections
The 2004 assessed valuation of the property within the District is estimated to be $2,442,861.
This figure is expected to rise to $5,544,537 by 2013 as the property is developed. A mill levy
of 48.5 mills on this property would raise $118,479 in the first year, rising to $265,802 in 2013.
In addition, one-time water system hook-up fees of $2,000 for newly -constructed affordable
units and $6,000 for newly -constructed free-market units would raise an average of
$7,713.50/year. Flat fees of $70/month for the affordable units and $210 for the free-market
units would raise an additional $47,586 in the first year (2005), rising to $91,490/year in ten
years as build -out progresses. Total revenue from all sources equals $292,060 in year one
(2004), rising to $362,668 in year ten (2013). Revenue in year one is high because the bond
issue of $290,000 is counted as revenue in this year. Flat fees and property tax revenue
collection would begin in year two and, with hook-up fees included, would total $176,674.
7. Demographic and Valuation Data
Population — Minimum 182, Maximum 252
Assessed Value as of 2004 - $2,442,861
8. Bonding Costs
$290,000 bond at 6.5% for 30 years = average annual debt service of $25,000
000051 22
0 0
9. Capital and Maintenance Costs
Capital Costs to the District consist of reconstruction of leach fields for existing ISDS's, water
system upgrades and expansion, landscaping, and road repairs. It is estimated that these costs
will total $107,075 in year one (2004) and will grow to $376,560 in 2013 as buildout
progresses. Annual maintenance costs are estimated to average $81,000/year. Thus total annual
costs will be: $25,000 debt service
$240,000 Capital Costs (average)
$ 81,000 Maintenance & Operations
TOTAL $347,000
Cash Flow projections for the District show that it will collect approximately $150,000 in
excess of expenditures in the fust year. This will allow the District to draw from that reserve in
years 3-5, when leach field reconstruction costs start to rise and, for those years, expenditures
will exceed revenue. As build out continues in years 6-10, revenue once again matches or
exceeds expenditures and allows the reserve fund to be rebuilt. A detailed cash flow projection
can be found in Tables 7 & 8, below.
10. Impact per household
➢ Affordable Units
Actual property value of $200,000 = $772.00 additional taxes/year or $64.00/month
Actual property value of $250,000= $965.00 additional taxes/year or $80.00/month
Actual property value of $206,400 (average value of existing Filing 1 affordable units) _
$797.00/month or $66.00/month
Additional impact of $70 month maintenance fee = average monthly cost of $136.00
Actual property value of $325,000 (average value of existing Filing 2 affordable units) _
$!,258 additional taxes or $105/month
➢ Free Market Units
Actual property value of $1,000,000 = $3,861.00 additional taxes/year or $322/month
Additional impact of $210/month maintenance fee = monthly cost of $532/month
11. Capital Expenditures
District expenditures will fall into several categories as detailed below:
23
000052
0
a.) Septic Tank and Leach Fields
Septic Tanks and leach fields are scheduled to be replaced or rebuilt as necessary over the next
nineteen years. The costs associated with this work will vary according to the condition of
existing facilities and system operation. According to preliminary estimates, expenditures will
range from a minimum of $30,699 in 2004, to a maximum of $150,308 in 2021. This is based
on a projection of the useful life of septic tanks and leach fields currently in use.
b.) Roads
Initial road construction will be the responsibility of the developer and the cost of that
construction will be home solely by the developer and will not be the responsibility of the
District. Assuming that all roads installed in the course of property development are correctly
and expertly built, the first capital replacement costs are not expected until 2010, with further
road repair costs anticipated in 2013. Those costs are estimated to be $14,146 and $42,038,
respectively. Road repair and replacement projects are anticipated at irregular intervals over the
next twenty years with a peak expenditure estimated at $225,950 in 2023.
c.) Water System
As with the roads, the initial design and construction costs for the potable water delivery system
will be home solely by the property developer and those facilities will be turned over to the
District for ongoing repair and maintenance. Capital replacement for water system elements is
first projected in 2006, when the new well construction is anticipated. The cost of that
improvement, which will be the responsibility of the District, will be $36,880. Further capital
replacement costs are anticipated at irregular intervals over the next twenty years with a
projected maximum expenditure of $180,820 in 2024.
d.) Other
Other District Capital Costs will be for the water filtration system in 2004 ($60,000) and for
landscaping, which is estimated to cost an average of $22,530 over the years 2005-2009.
These costs are only for the tasks and responsibilities anticipated by this Service Plan.
I. Operating and Maintenance Costs
The District will incur annual operational costs associated with maintenance and upkeep of the
various infrastructure elements for which the District will be responsible. The following table
estimates those annual costs based on average amounts.
000053 24
0
TABLE 9
OTHER AVERAGE ANNUAL DISTRICT COSTS
9ASED ON CURRENT HOA CHARGES
ITEM/DESCRIPTION
COST
Operations (i) $ 9,400
Billing/Administration $ 6,000
Water Control System/Electrical $ 7,600
Routine Maintenance & Repairs $20,000
Snow Removal (ii) $ 8,640
Landscape Maintenance (iii) $12,960
Trash Removal (iv) $17.280
TOTAL $81,880
0
Includes chemicals, lab tests, system status reports and miscellaneous inspections by water
system operator.
ii. Assumes snow removal cost of $10/futished lot/month
iii. Assumes landscape maintenance cost of $15/finished lot/month
iv. Assumes trash removal cost of $20/finished lot/month,
Source: Water & Wastewater Engineering
VIII. Annual Report
Upon request, the District will submit an Annual Report to local governments within one
hundred and twenty (120) days from the conclusion of the District's fiscal year, which will
coincide with the calendar year. The Annual Report may include some or all of the following
information:
a. Boundary changes made or proposed
b. Intergovernmental Agreements concluded or pending
C. Changes or pending changes in District policies
d. Changes or pending changes in District operations, responsibilities and activities
e. Status of District staffing and operating costs
f. Status of construction or planning projects underway
g. Significant changes in District finances, including a summary balance sheet
h. Status of any litigation involving the District
i. General plans for the upcoming year
j. Current assessed valuation in the District
k. Status of District Board members including term, attendance at Board meetings, voting
records and Board member comments on District operations.
25
000054
0 0
I. Records of District facility usage, water usage, traffic counts, population, and other
indicators of activity within the District.
in. Other matters of interest or concern including public input and environmental issues.
IX. Modification of Service Plan
The District will obtain the approval of the counties within the District before making any material
modifications to this Service Plan. Material modifications include changes to the basic or essential
nature of the District including, but not limited to, changes to the services or programs undertaken
by the District, planned dissolution of the District, changes in debt limits, changes in revenue
sources, or increases or reductions in the land area under District responsibility. County approval
will not be sought, and is not necessary, to modify the terms of financing instruments or to change
the methods and procedures for carrying out services and activities included in this Service Plan.
X. Disclosure
The Organizers and the District will take steps to ensure that the developers of property located
within the District provide written notice upon closing to purchasers of land regarding the
existence of taxes imposed by the District. The District will record a statement against the property
within the District at such time as the property is legally included therein, giving notice to the
existence of the District.
XI. Board of Directors
The Organizers propose the following qualified electors of the District to serve as the Board of
Directors of the District upon election and approval of the District:
Name Proposed Tenn
XXXX 4 years
XXXX 4 years
XXXX 2 years
XXXX 2 years
XXXX 2 years
All Directors will be elected At Large, although the District will attempt to encourage
representation from the different neighborhoods within the District.
26
000055
XII. Appendix
Appendix 1— District Map and Legal Description
Appendix 2 — Conceptual Development Plan
Appendix 3 — Individual Sewage Disposal System Plan
Appendix 4 — Water System Plan
Appendix 5 — Road Plan
Appendix 6 - Filings
27
0
MATCHLINE THIS SHEET
7 METROPOLITAN DISTRICT EXHIBIT MAP w
A PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTIONS 21 AND 22, T 9 S, R 85 W, OF THE 6TH P.M.
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
9815'SY E
S
'Mw E
la.s.' GRAPHIC SCALE
s P9Nvn9r E �,
J (P 9Eii I
� / �1fle•f L Im6 � Y00 M1
\ f 1. Y519 6 B[MINCS Eq T119 EIINEI 19 /. 9LMINC q !M4 MgTI GELf1Y11(D
s T G.P.S. IBYRV1lld �YIEIDIA 9FMIIG % 9
]} 11 3 A! 0K11 O 21 SCRId E1 Mp M [/3i DIMiq OE EOIQ SECT'.
\ 1. EI. 11 NWIMY LMS L.S. /SOE]9 IM R/L[.
�N ]. 10 PILLG 4MKi N9 PWLMm !q 1X19 EGIIIi WP.
]. M SNIOED ML.L RF➢N[SEML] 1liRCPLIIINI OlSmlti YUEMY.
o
e I�
9 :YYti# GwE
I /-S •E
MATCHLINE THIS SHEET
Appendix I
PPOJECi NO.
200088102
91EET �
� 1
Nlaae J11P ,
E
"I
MIT•
1 I P]C
]✓]✓
e-mne
Ln
-xis
�
.1 A
e-,
7 METROPOLITAN DISTRICT EXHIBIT MAP w
A PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTIONS 21 AND 22, T 9 S, R 85 W, OF THE 6TH P.M.
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
9815'SY E
S
'Mw E
la.s.' GRAPHIC SCALE
s P9Nvn9r E �,
J (P 9Eii I
� / �1fle•f L Im6 � Y00 M1
\ f 1. Y519 6 B[MINCS Eq T119 EIINEI 19 /. 9LMINC q !M4 MgTI GELf1Y11(D
s T G.P.S. IBYRV1lld �YIEIDIA 9FMIIG % 9
]} 11 3 A! 0K11 O 21 SCRId E1 Mp M [/3i DIMiq OE EOIQ SECT'.
\ 1. EI. 11 NWIMY LMS L.S. /SOE]9 IM R/L[.
�N ]. 10 PILLG 4MKi N9 PWLMm !q 1X19 EGIIIi WP.
]. M SNIOED ML.L RF➢N[SEML] 1liRCPLIIINI OlSmlti YUEMY.
o
e I�
9 :YYti# GwE
I /-S •E
MATCHLINE THIS SHEET
Appendix I
PPOJECi NO.
200088102
91EET �
� 1
Key
■Common Lands (Lots 1-5) VNth
Conservation Easement (69 40 Ac)
❑Open Space Located Within Lots
1-5 (16.91 Acres)
EJLand Trust Donation (35.13
Acres)
❑Pitldn County Open Space
Donation (40.34 Acres)
ElHome Owners Association Donation and Accessory
ISDS Building Envelopes (17.73 Acres)
❑Proposed Affordable Housing
Mitigation and Re -Platted RO Lots
Home Owners Association Property with
Land Trust Easement (7.79 Acres)
Trails
Evergreen
Building Envelopes
Allwaad. Hau.mq Miti,atia, n ,,
IAr.. r.-Ia[atW RO at.
Ae.
C.�uia• yle
Ria c era. I., .—a
\ j,a\ 3.
k �
y
x�
181 A" W
Cwrgrean saran \
�AO' RTi(. Stw Ea.we.et
/---60Star W.aTa.wew,t
/ !
DATE:
Area,.O
00 VV
t1.rW,
$"���
REVISIONS:
/` .
id ."I*!,;l-,
Conceptual Development Plan
P P
IAu1ua 1001
K,\
\/
\ 7 4,
! Au1u.E 200
Key
■Common Lands (Lots 1-5) VNth
Conservation Easement (69 40 Ac)
❑Open Space Located Within Lots
1-5 (16.91 Acres)
EJLand Trust Donation (35.13
Acres)
❑Pitldn County Open Space
Donation (40.34 Acres)
ElHome Owners Association Donation and Accessory
ISDS Building Envelopes (17.73 Acres)
❑Proposed Affordable Housing
Mitigation and Re -Platted RO Lots
Home Owners Association Property with
Land Trust Easement (7.79 Acres)
Trails
Evergreen
Building Envelopes
Allwaad. Hau.mq Miti,atia, n ,,
IAr.. r.-Ia[atW RO at.
Ae.
C.�uia• yle
Ria c era. I., .—a
\ j,a\ 3.
k �
y
x�
181 A" W
Cwrgrean saran \
�AO' RTi(. Stw Ea.we.et
/---60Star W.aTa.wew,t
/ !
DATE:
Area,.O
00 VV
t1.rW,
$"���
REVISIONS:
/` .
id ."I*!,;l-,
Conceptual Development Plan
P P
IAu1ua 1001
K,\
\/
\ 46. i
! Au1u.E 200
oOo�5 I
,or
\
�/
b
;r'
DATE:
SHEET:
_tq ,,, 1TR„
ISPI\. A RST
W/J Ranch PUD
$"���
REVISIONS:
/` .
id ."I*!,;l-,
Conceptual Development Plan
P P
IAu1ua 1001
xe, .,.,,r.nn^..r.^.
rn 7
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
! Au1u.E 200
oOo�5 I
W' 6NIb Slay Eoavnmt `\
AIIwEoble Housing Miligolion
1 .
R<-LOco,eE Cellular 9le \
'@':...lk
I
Anaa Of
q
,
179 Acrea - i I t / 60.7 Anna `ri(
' �� �`'• \`,•.'." ♦..` 6.50
'. �/fin '♦'. AR RES�RVFDFbR FU�TUREI y � ._ - ``�`\
�`\•�. `\ AGE DISPOSAL SvS U ;\. i > •"
v ,
�EA RESERVED EOR FUTURE INONIDUAL
$EW GE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS\♦ \ ��� ♦''\\\
y r v v
b \` �' '♦ ♦ ♦\ APPendix 3
PFOR FILRURE AG@DISPOSAL DMW S - 10.0D AyYa �ifj `�i7 �1•
;iii',a,�>\�\_�.._'_ T •.,y _/' � � / LEGEND
19.35 A9r6 '
\\� S PLACEMENT
♦♦Z�\'\♦�` �♦ a'. AREA AVAILABLE FORISD.
\ \ a v\\ \
C `
0=0 O EXISTING SEPTIC TANK de
\ EXISTING LEACHFIELD o 290 •99
O O O G J 31 \'` \ 1 (GRAPHIC SG IN i12T)
W� W W REVISK N5
ENGINEERING, INC. No. DESCRIPTION Da7E By c" �cN w' FRW WW/J SERVICE PLAN FIGURE
621 SEVENTEENTH ST-, STE. 1020 PHONE 303.292.3503 1c0uN1Y ma1N Imre - vem9 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PLAN 2
DENVER, COLORADO 80293 FAX 303.292.3547 sure Ca019A00 PtN'NECT No 99.9R -09a
I
AlWdle Ha smg Mitigation Re -Loco
f—AiJER-Nii
APPROXIMATE LAYOUT FOR., 161 A.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
MITIGATION LOTS BASED ON
CONCEPTUAL PLAN
, it . 0
]]9Acrs
/ A
650
WELL #1
14
WELL.
WELL
000059
W.4*4 It W
A4* ENGINEERING, INC.
621 SEVENTEENTH ST.. STE. 1020 PHONE 303.292.3503
DENVER, COLORADO 80293 FAX 303.292.3547
Appendix 4
X
Aqb
'Fiat Om -fix
A
XKX
OESKINED w: REP
c"Ecical
cWNtt PITKINt lo"`E 11=1
STATE cmGRADo PIKI W, 0.012,E)0il
W/J SERVICE PLAN
WATER PLAN
LEGEND
EXISTING WATERLINE
PROPOSED WATER LINE
)D FIRE HYDRANT
WATER VALVE
0 2w 4 -
(GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET)
FIGURE
1
Mlle SNII, E
cefl.l., Sit.
N4 FOR NEW
MA TANK
51.12 ACrq
ORAGE TANK$
3&72 Adel
Appendix 4
X
Aqb
'Fiat Om -fix
A
XKX
OESKINED w: REP
c"Ecical
cWNtt PITKINt lo"`E 11=1
STATE cmGRADo PIKI W, 0.012,E)0il
W/J SERVICE PLAN
WATER PLAN
LEGEND
EXISTING WATERLINE
PROPOSED WATER LINE
)D FIRE HYDRANT
WATER VALVE
0 2w 4 -
(GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET)
FIGURE
1
%
Afford0le Housing Miffigoow It
%
. .........
IN
ItP
2.51 Avw
31.12 Atrw
'Xv'Aaft
'-X I.
6.50
"tt
•
Ito
�72/A&os
.'ol* . . . . . . . . . . . .
A�-
Z",
Appendix 5
10.00A�*
LEGEND
me, EXISTING ROAD TO BE ABANDONED
E
Nm EXISTING ROAD TO REMAINt9m--A
NEW ROAD
X4.'sk,
X\
0 m
00006()
(GRAPHICSGLLE IN MET)
b�
I REVISIONS
WA*4 Ic W"* FNO F DESCRIPTION DATE BY DESIGNED W. REP W/J SERVICE PLAN FIGURE
ENGINEERING, INC. cm cFec m Fra
621 SEVENTEENTH ST., STE. 1020 PHONE 303.292.3503 cot9rrr PIT IPTE ROAD PLAN 3
DENVER, COLORADO 80293 FAX 303.292.3547 STATE caoRAOO PROJECT NO W012u
I
1 I
I I
I \
I \ \
\ �.J • VA VA
1
\� a
■Filing #1
■ Filing #2
■ Filing #3
® Filing#4
❑ Filing #5
000061
y \\ •"; �: Vii• .thy+ .
w0
W --'
1 YYYY�`
nw Grana, TMI a.o6 • \\\ \ \ "\ \� \
Iq
�J
Dmw Ewrgew� Sawn
f60 WIN Ste, EaOwnml
r-60' Ste, Now Eosmwt
www c��
\ wY
y
-=`'tel •.�— ,
} \
\ \• 10 ,
• r Appendix 6
66,E
7.u
o�m .m
+mo
DATE:
SHEET:
"; ANu, , „ ,I.\ Ili
lIN� I 441\ IICf
W/J Ranch PUD
1 8. Umbar 2003
�
II
�srr. tr�xli.11
Filings
REVISIONS:
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
8
AccountNc ParcelNumber OwnerAddress1
StreetName
StreetSuffi. Legal Description
TotalLand\ Totallmps\ TotalAsse:
R015339
264322302001 WILSON GARTH
BULLWINKLE
CIR
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
100000
159200
20630
R015353
264322302002 VESTRAND TERRA L
BULLWINKLE
CIR
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
125000
277500
32040
R015354
264322302003 KELEHER CHRISTOPHER L
BULLWINKLE
PL
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
125000
0
36250
R015400
264322201004 RIZZUTO ELLYN
BULLWINKLE
PL
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:1 LOT
100000
177900
22120
R015401
264322201005 LOWE W/J LLC
BULLWINKLE
PL
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:1 LOT
125000
0
36250
R015402
264322201006 VARDY ITZHAK & DAHLIA
BULLWINKLE
PL
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:1 LOT
100000
168900
21400
R015403
264322201007 MCDONOUGH ROBERT P
BULLWINKLE
PL
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:1 LOT
100000
176100
21980
R015404
264322201008 LOWE W/J LLC
BULLWINKLE
PL
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:1 LOT
125000
79900
16310
R015405
264322201009 LOWE W/J LLC
BULLWINKLE
PL
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:1 LOT
125000
0
36250
R015355
264322302004 LOWE W/J LLC 90%
BULLWINKLE
PL
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
125000
50300
13950
R015356
264322302005 MARTUS RICHARD CHARLES
BULLWINKLE
CIR
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
100000
117700
17330
R015336
264322211001 VIOLA PAUL K & KATHERINE K
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
125000
0
36250
R015338
264322211002 EVERHART BRADLEY LYNN
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
125000
0
36250
R015334
264322301037 SAILOR MICHAEL
MCLAIN FLATS
RD
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:14 DE
100000
253500
28140
R015138
264322301003 SAFIR SHELLY
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:15 DE
100000
220600
25520
R015139
264322301004 MAROLT MICHAEL S
MCLAIN FLATS
RD
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:16 DE
50000
165100
17120
R015140
264322301005 VHRIN GEORGETTE & ROBERT S
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:17 DE
50000
166600
17240
R015141
264322301006 ROSENBAUM MICHAEL J
MCLAIN FLATS
RD
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:18 DE
50000
166000
17190
R015142
264322301007 FINGER PAUL A
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:19 DE
50000
164700
17090
R015143
264322301008 WHITTINGHAM PHILIP & SUSAN
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:20 DE
50000
165100
17120
R015340
264322211003 GAMRAT MARK E & KELLY J
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
100000
280000
30250
R015341
264322211004 FOSS MARILYN K
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
100000
254200
28190
R015342
264322211005 TSCHAPPAT ROCKY & KELLY
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
125000
0
36250
R015343
264322211006 GREWAL RISHI S
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
125000
0
36250
R015344
264322211007 HANEMAN ROGER & SARA
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
115000
110000
17910
R015345
264322211008 YOUNGER MICHAEL
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
75000
200000
21890
R015346
264322211009 MITCHELL DEREK & MARNI
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
125000
0
36250
R015347
264322211010 CALLAHAN JOHN F & KATHLEEN E
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
125000
0
36250
R015348
264322211011 KELEHER BRIAN G & ALICIA M
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
125000
0
36250
R015349
264322211012 SLOAN TRICIA C
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
100000
272500
29650
R015350
264322211013 HIGHTOWER BRIAN T & EMILY L
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLKA LOT
125000
0
36250
R015351
264322211014 MAROLT STEVE M & CHARLOTTE S
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLKA LOT
125000
0
36250
R015352
264322211015 ROBERTS MARK A
LOWER BULLWINKLE
LN
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
100000
237000
26830
R015144
264322301009 MOTTIER OLIVIER & AMY C
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:34 DE
50000
151500
16040
R015145
264322301010 ANZINI KEITH W & SUSAN M TWIGG
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:35 DE
50000
155900
16390
R015146
264322301011 SMITH ANTHONY
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:36 DE
50000
151500
16040
R015147
264322301012i�iCEEL� O)A&k
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:37 DE
50000
151500
16040
R015148
264322301013 HORNBURG KATHLEEN S & SHAUN �
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:38 DE
50000
151200
16020
R015149
264322301014 ALLARD JOHN P
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:39 DE
50000
138500
15000
R015150
264322301015 KIRKPATRICK SNOWDIE KAY
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:40 DE
50000
150200
15940
R015151
264322301016 WILCOX SHELLY K
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:41 DE
50000
151500
16040
R015152
264322301017 PERSON DANIEL W & CHRISTINA D
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:42 DE
50000
151500
16040
R015153
264322301018 PISANO MALLORY A
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:43 DE
50000
151500
16040
R015154
264322301019 GROGAN SIMONE & TIM
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:44 DE
50000
159700
16690
R015155
264322301020 CLARK COURTNEY L
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:45 DE
50000
145400
15550
R015156
264322301021 VAN CLEAVE SHAWNA
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:46 DE
50000
157200
16490
R015157
264322301022 LANGLINAIS CRAIG S
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:47 DE
50000
159100
16640
R015158
264322301023 THURBER MARK J & TAMARA L
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:48 DE
50000
156500
16440
R015159
264322301024 ZELL JOHN M
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:49
50000
149000
15840
R015160
264322301025 SEMPLE SASHA LYN & LORENZO III
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:50 DE
50000
150500
15960
R015161
264322301026 SMAGALA JOHN JR
STEVENS
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:51 DE
50000
151500
16040
AccountNc ParcelNumber
R015162 264322301027
R015163 264322301028
R015164 264322301029
R015165 264322301030
R015166 264322301031
R015167 264322301032
R015168 264322301033
R015169 264322301034
R015170 264322301035
R015357 264322302006
R015406 264322202001
R017132 264322302007
R015171 264322301036
R015409 264321102008
OwnerAddress1
StreetName
BONFILS MICHELLE
STEVENS
LUTZ KAREN DIANE & JAMES R
STEVENS
STEPHEN DAVID & LISA I
STEVENS
CAMPBELL MICHAEL J & RHODA L
STEVENS
GARSIDE JULIE
STEVENS
JONES PAUL G
STEVENS
BHATT KIRAN & INDIRA S
STEVENS
FOSTER LAURA J
STEVENS
TREADWELL ELIZABETH E
STEVENS
TRUE JAMES R & NINA W
BULLWINKLE
LOWE W/J LLC
BULLWINKLE
WOZNICKI LAURENCE
BULLWINKLE
HOMEOWNERS ASSOC OF W/J RANCH HOMEf STEVENS
LOWE W/J LLC
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:57 DE
StreetSuffi, Legal Description
TotalLand\ Totallmps\ TotalAsse:
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:52 DE
50000
149400
15870
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:53 DE
50000
151500
16040
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:54 DE
50000
150200
15940
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:55 DE
50000
149800
15900
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:56 DE
50000
150900
15990
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:57 DE
50000
151500
16040
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:58 DE
50000
150900
15990
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:59 DE
50000
150200
15940
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:60 DE
50000
150900
15990
CIR
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:2 LOT
100000
278800
30150
PL
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES BLK:3 LOT
125000
535800
52600
CIR
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES DESC: PAI
2000000
1838900
305580
ST
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:A C1
33000
0
9570
SUB:W/J RANCH HOMES LOT:B DE:
1009500
0
292760
2018500
0
0
PITHIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone (970) 920-5526 FAX (970) 920-5439
MEMORANDUM
TO: Finance
County Engineer
Environmental Health
Woody Creek Caucus
W/J Homeowner's Association
FROM: Lance Clarke, Community Development Department
RE: W/J Metropolitan District Service Plan
(PID 2643-223-00-006; Case P042-04)
DATE: March 25, 2004
The Applicant has made minor amendments to pages 8, 9, 13, 19 and the Septic Table.
Please replace the pages in the application I mailed to you on March 18, 2004.
Thank you.
000062
9 0
PITKIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone (970) 920-5526 FAX (970) 920-5439
MEMORANDUM
TO: Finance
County Engineer
Environmental Health
Woody Creek Caucus
W/J Homeowner's Association
FROM: Lance Clarke, Community Development Department
RE: W/J Metropolitan District Service Plan (PID 2643-223-00-006; Case P042-04)
DATE:. March 18, 2004
Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application submitted by The W/J
Metro District Organizing Committee. The Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission will
review this case on Tuesday, March 30, 2003. The Board of County Commissioners will have a
fust reading on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 and a second reading and review on Wednesday, April
28, 2004.
We are under a special state statute timeline, which does not allow for the usual referral review
period. If possible, I would like your comments by Thursday, March 25, 2004, so that they can be
included in the Planning and Zoning Commission's review.
We realize this is an inconvenience, but we greatly appreciate your effort and understanding.
PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION MATERIALS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IF YOU
HAVE NO FURTHER NEED OF THEM.
Thank you.
000063
0 0
PITEIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920-5526 FAX# (970) 920-5439
March 18, 2004
Mr. Mark Fuller
Fuller Consulting Services
0238 Fawn Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
Re: W/J Metropolitan District Service Plan (PID 2643-223-00-006; Case P042-04)
Dear Mr. Fuller:
This application has been scheduled for review by the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning
Commission,' Plaza One Conference Room, 530 E. Main St., Aspen on Tuesday, March 30,
2004, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform
you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Community
Development Office.
We have scheduled this application for a first reading by the Board of County Commissioners, on
Wednesday, April 14, 2004, and at a public hearing for a second reading and discussion on
Wednesday, April 28, 2004, at meetings to begin at 2:00 p.m., Plaza One Conference Room, 530
E. Main St., Aspen, Colorado. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that
a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning Office.
If you have any questions, please call Lance Clarke, the planner assigned to your case, at 920-5452.
Sincerely,
Janis Taylor
Administrative Assistant
0006 r
0 0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
c/o Lance Clarke
FROM: Silvia Davis
RE: Service Plan — Proposed Formation of W/J Metropolitan District
DATE: March 3, 2004
A service plan for a proposed district was fled in my office today, March 2, 2004. The contact
person filing the service plan is Mark Fuller, 970-963-4959.
Per CRS 32-1-204(2), the clerk and recorder must deliver the service plan to the county planning
commission. In compliance with this statute, I am forwarding 6 service plans to you today. As
liaison for the planning commission, will you please deliver these to the proper persons. This
statute states that the planning commission has 30 days from the date of fling the plan to make a
recommendation to the board, which is by April 1 ".
I will talk to administration about the following:
1. Set Date for a Public Hearing. Schedule an agenda item (Packet due April 8, 4:00
PM) for the regular BOCC meeting of April 14, 2004. At this meeting the BOCC will
set a date for a public hearing within 30 days of April 14th (CRS 32-1-202). The
next regular meeting after April 14th that satisfies this criteria is April 28th. (Statute
says "At the next regular meeting of the BOCC which is held at least 10 days after
the final planning commission action on the service plan, the BOCC shall set a day
for a public hearing on the service plan").
2. Public Hearing. Schedule an agenda item for public hearing for April 28, 2004
(packet material due April 22nd at 4:00 PM).
3. Publication. April 3`d issue of Aspen Times Weekly. For your information, statute
requires the BOCC to make publication of this hearing at least 20 days before the
hearing date [32-1-204(1)].
I'm assuming that the planning department will prepare the agenda item summaries.
Thanks
cc: Hilary Smith
Susan Murphy
Mark Fuller
John Ely
spec _dsnplan_mem _rec_dist.doc
000065
16869
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920-5526
Pitkin County
Land Use:
172 Board of Adjustment
159 County Land Use Code
173 Deposit
174 Flat Fee Y
162 Zoning and Sign
169 Public Notice t
160 Planning Enforcement
Referral Fees:
RB 115 Access Permit
210 Airport
LUC01 County Clerk -
211 County Engineer
194 Environmental Health
208 Historic
198 Housing
190 Land Management
209 Redstone HPC
206 Wildlife Officer
Building Fees:
170 Board of Appeals
135 Building Code Sales
105 Building Permit
100 Contractor License
120 Electrical Permit
195 Energy Code Review
115 Mechanical Permit
150 Plan Check
110 Plumbing Permit
130 Reinspection
151 Aspen Sanitation
152 AVFD Fire Marshal
Other Fees:
155 Use Tax
165 Copy
Performance Deposit
185 Park Dedication
186 Parking Cash in Lieu
IS GIS Requirements
B1202 Road Impact Fee
B1203 School Impact Fee
QAK66
NAME: r •_ L L
ADDRESS/PROJECT:
PHONE:
CHECK#'
CASE/PERMIT#:I #OFCOPIES:
DATE: INITIAL:
MATCHLINE THIS SHEET
A S
I 579 BC
o \ \
1
p=18'20'45"
R=1170.08 \ fi
L=374.65 5 \
CB N2P25'41"W
C=373.05
A PARCEL OF LAND
rr
•
POINT OF BEGINNING
LOT 31
C B1,F
2. F
nA �
A` l 'LOT 2]
62.F2
LOT 24
2, F3.
�\ BIR./F31
N 75'19'56" Q4''
133.37
=�
N 23'36' 7" E u _
93.2 '
ri 51'48' 79' c
85.47
33
F2
LOT .1 e ^ r
�.
LOT 12
\� 8 2r F 21
N \ LPT 20
LOT 1/9)//I
OT p
p.1 02'46'1 W Z,
L n
131.7 I I �•\ O
88'372
246.94'
IN33 47 46"W /
0.31' J/
I I N8E37'29'E
x.68'
N 7;9'11"E
26.97'I-
33'47'50"W
70:10'
I I I A-.2-41'3
0
R='8
L=3.
CN32'2
7
05"W
C
36,.72
p-17'49' 16"
R=-649.46
L=202.00
CB --N 3'01"IN
I I 1.1
I I I p=8'02' I
R-811 5 I
L=113.93"
o ' C8=
C13.84N14' 6'21"W
=1
4
L 1 I I I
I I
i
I II Q
METROPOLITAN DISTRICT EXHIBIT MAP
IN SECTIONS 21 AND 22, T 9 S, R 85 W, OF THE 6TH P.M.
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
N 88'15'37' E
101.14'
S 81'09'24" E 200
129.56'
S 75'40'23" E C`
107.55'
9 136.
OT 9
BLOT F83 8 1, F 3 z804�q„
S 32'50'24" E
132.28'
\\)
LOT 3
/r B t F a Lp
\ a6'
�O u'
L Y.
8 1, F ' LOT 62
B3 F3
Y
LOT 5 \ N
�B 1, F3 1 '� O
Om
LA r.
J I I o?
m
LO' 10
ez�3
SLOT F33 O \, L
o 1 O ariaceL 2
L\
LOT IS
i
OT
GRAPHIC SCALE
190 200 400
\i 9T 13 \ \`
LOT Itr.
LOT 38
1 -0-
LOT
LOT 37
L 40
1
/Lo t
4
LOT 43 0T 0
.1 1 LOT M
,1
��.. l0T 41
ul
z
41�
u
r OT
1 a 'LOT 50
J
p=11'01'28"
R=515.00
L=99.09
CB=N05'14'19"W
C=98.94
I
N 00'IE'25" E
87J4'
LOT 49 /
L T
LOT 53
LOT
t
0i
LOT I L LOT OT \ R
I
V
OT 56
N 89'43'35"^+ 1140.73'
S 001751"
184.E7'
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 200 ft_
Boo
I= i MATCHLINE THIS SHEET
m1
(
III-- - ---- _
5 89'48' .' F 517,69' i---
"� ",
S 17'49'50" W
52.30'
08'32'10" E
148.36'
z
O
co
W
W
0
z
O O
Lj
2
H W
W Y ¢ J
U Co
Z
Z W�
00
W o8
600
WW N N
V Z W O O
Z3 Z
W
Z Co�CO)
LLI
O
O OO
�-- u O
Z to
5 LLf
39
O Zin^
_ `1,99
Y
(� 53��
_ mW��
_L0 -j it
O
0 U
�0 J
¢o J
U
m Z
W �
z 0
Y
H
a
PROJECT N0,
2000638.02
SHEET
OF 1