The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.eh.246717400012 (1991)Document Layout (From Most Recent to Oldest Permit) Permit Application Log Sheet/Notes & Photos Communications As -built Design Engineer Design Soil Information Water Permit & Information Second System on property Third System etc. Floor Plans Please See Building and Land Use Approvals Files for additional information. • ASPEN®PITKIN • »,q—o — ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT Q 4 a INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT NO.q O G TYPE OF PERMIT: ( ):nitial Construction 1 )Emergency Use 1 )Repair tlork,(Piovioua Permit 1.) )Alteration o1 an existing syatis, or installation (Previous Permit 1 ( )Use Permit as a result o1 Sale 1 )Othor, ISSTED TOO: I DATE OF ISSUE. S- ZZ -CI O Owner 1�Wl6 Larl6o� Home Phone gZ-4-3(/ffgBusiness PhonegZ`J- cF-)(p3 Mailing I1� 1' " � Address �j� tiD�IGl.V1Gi. �J1��5 �OKy� Y3aSGui C� &IVZ� Agent Phone Mailing Address Sewage Disposal System Work to be performed by This permit valid only for premises location by the folllovinglegal descriptions rQ( TJy 5121, WWW WT SIZE ,/. (]-P.(t_S NATER SUPPLY eyY Va4C VV -e-1 I AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE. )�� This Individual Sewage Disposal Permit is granted with regard to the following uses -)trio Le F-0- %U �A Nu.dscr of. Dedreoms 4 LoftsCartage Disposals_ Dishwashers_L Clothes Washer, CALCULATED AVERAGE DAILY BASTE LOAD (Q Q C) GALLONS. THE NATURE OF THE SYSTEM 1INCLUDED UNDER THIS PERMIT: Type of Tank or Treatment Units $.eFi>`� C� T0.•Y�� Tank Capacity ZSLJ �b_Callon minim= Absorptlo0 Area Ntthod of Final Disposals -7 Square Fest Minimum sorpt,o)-� pi -f -s Description (including brand name, if any) of other cqulpmont or appurtnanceat r L r -q-a1o50rrbPniy6nCktS 1t5Cd ik,s}cadll Z30 GrLe&ZJ �eP� 6F 3i�M+ WIG{ -f JYLYILLlreq(Wed- _� 6reya.vtd 1�IaCk Wa.4e. r- 5y5+�rns tk5 d, ukAA-t-A-t 15V54e,w) Cah �e )Ager,) trey(wa.5kierq vna�, i,,uand showtrs)GLncl ,r black Wa4f�i CL 1o�09Al�ov� Oth Con ti ns or E cifi a Sones vfu ( t6k-"K- a.rid 3�- scj u.A. r -e (, t+ ll� ph5of p(oy, p i 4 (+ ^ , I W Cp 0/ i 1 ZV1G� ake co 15 Q� rut. ` J STAGES REQUIRING INSPECTION BY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT: ( )Refore Excavation ( )Upon completion of excavation and prior to pin Gement of gravel �41lefore covering distribution ry stem of absorption field Prior to backfill of any component ( )Other, Specify, Plans and specifications of the proposed sewage disposal system have born reviewed and are ccnsidercd satisfactory. Permission in hereby granted to the- owner or his agent to perform the work indicated above in accordance with the Pitkin County Individual Scu3lc DinPc"l Regulations in clfcCt on the date of tusuc. In addition tO general praviarona act forth on the rQvorie her4ot, this Permit is suhject to the following additional terms and conditions: APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY C,� (title) Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Officer Tho above imi(vidual ea•ago disposal aystcm installed by _ rv::ponn:b(Itty in ce:,! Of failure or inad yuacy of tu-ki scv.ntu dinposal• ayatem. ComPIeLn as -Lulu draving Attaenad. DATE OF F :::1I. INS' :CTIPII Aspen/Pitkin Environmental BY:—! L� _-_ TITLE_ Health Officer 77 2 L �� -- r d i p' `� 9/� X93 0°^l� 130 South Galenrs Street Aspen, Colorado 11 r 303/920-6070 0 CC_. L am �akAA-- --1114 � 1-N� DAVID LAMBERT CONSTRUCTIORWCCOWASPEN*PITKIN NEP 1932 P. o. 1311 2"1=-r4VAhbNMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT A. PEN, CO 61612 pay the m4NpL�rQA I orderer 1t I ((�1QQ,, &_r l> o f Oft P_ Adderspbe fraQ�nk NMpo�A�S Sn&ZQnAN' T3 t c ee tip I vDD I" Legal Description 82-161/1021 O AN INDIVIDUPji SEWAGE DISPOSAT, PERMIT of Lot "PC OF STRUCTURE: KSIngleFamily Dwelling ( )Other: Do you plan any further dditlons to the residence? ( )YES NO No. of Ledrooms � No. of Lofts � No. of Garbage Disposals No. of Automatic Dishwashers _ No. of Automatic Clothes Washer. n / WATER SUPPLY: �Prive [e well, Depth 2qo Or ( )Pab11c, Name of System ( )Spring ( )Strcem or Creek ]]I TYPES OF INDIVIDUAL SEwAOE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSF.Dt I (.)Septic T3nk/AbsorptIO1 Field ( )Aeration Plant/Absorption Field ( )Composting Toilet ( )Incineration Toilet ( )!bund ( )Recycling, potable use ( )Recycling, other use 1 )Vjult Privy 1 )Other, 1 The initial site inspection must be arranged with the Aspen/Pitkin Envlronmdntal Health Department (925-2020, 8:30-9:10 a.m.) kc(e.e .e,. o� ...u. d. The rn,e -.1 O.ulding permit can be obtained. FINAL INSPECTION APPROVAL MUST BE GIVEN BY THE ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL H[[ALTH DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO IIACKFILLING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. - 'r I is true and that false 1 Signature of Applicant _ r the application and any subsequent permirt�. DATE 7 tJ (This application becomes. invalid 12 moths from the above date.) 4 NOTE: PLOT PLAN must be filed with this application. Please locate the following items by measured 1. Property lines and dimensions. r 2. Proposed and existing water wells on subject Oroperty and adjacent property. 3. Domestic water service lines. - {. Proposed and existing buildings, driveways, and other structures. 1 S. Streams, lakes, ponds, irrigation ditches, and other water 6. Proposed and existing individual sewage systels on subject property. R SUBMIT A REVISED PLOT PLAN PRIOR TO CONST UCTION IF INSTALLATION IS TO BE CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL PLAN. The unde[aI ned ¢qle by acknowledges receipt or this individual sewage dilpoael permit application and a permit !ee in chQ\Ano unt or $ - • O U Receipt Number Dace Fee Rc�clvrd Q -y- 9� by wJ __ A Sniscretivo Officer 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 61611 303/920-5070 0 +i' 3i nem we'll u.eo r /0 2i Pt caled - 5 --XX sf 3�0 ex�415-old 1w�sz. ,' S1De-WRb(, 1 7t �zCJc Puti�s Di�l'�'�� p X , 02/22/1992 04:30 3039279830 PEAU/ is i NEW ►sso cap. j ceac�ee4fe TguK Lei NsV wl rr PAGE 01 COAL URTCR SlbXA5E 7ANK3 1 `7 x �. 'Y1 SbF®ou 40 pvc sl.CEVE 20, �\ v ' Laub PACKEO wr% c4m"C F \, OCT* ews 77 St-DIWO D+t Y wrt.e, R1,u�s �ij� ` � aA 9� aEvJ ►4lEf SET !N JOlri10, LPXCJW. CI Lip \ um+ CRJswD M, Yo N6K ��D GAr»OERT ,�gEs�DtNCE GA'�R SEPTIC 54S7'EJ�I � \ x 7 ooTff W, BASAVr \ i VOKSHEET FOR SEPTIC SIZI '&AME: LOCATION: mg -b Ila? -31o? o K SEPTIC TANK SIZE # OF BEDROOMS = o GALLONSSPETIC TANK ABSORPTION SYSTEM # OF BEDROOMS _ X 2 (people/bedroom) X 75 (gal/person/day) _ ("Q") (calculated average daily waste load) SOIL PROFILE. NOTE ANY PROBLEMS: PERC RATE: HOLE #1 _ HOLE #2 HOLE #3 _ PERC RATE AVERAGE = L MPI (MINUTES PER INCH SOIL CLASS / = LOADING RATE ("L") /• 3 P -j �� g""` 1.1 = 7`/ O /f S o (5 I FIELD tr CaQ /— 9 /�`lGs A = 1.95 X "O" = 1.95 X = SQ FEE`I� g r d (qt Ir INFILTRATOR FIELD (40% REDUCTION) X .60 = SQ FEET �ox�ox9 TRENCH A = 1.5 X "Q" = 1.5 X = SQ FEET ..L.. INFILTRATOR TRENCH (50% REDUCTIONS a X .5 = SQ FEET - jx3 13X%3 3 17 S y q . ASPEN*PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPAR MENT September 7, 1993 Memo To File From : Nancy MacKenzie RE: Lambert Septic Permit Parcel ID 2467-174-00-012 In mid August 1993, Bob Nelson signed off on the final Inspection AND back dated the Lambert Septic Permit in my presence. The signature is not valid because Bob Nelson signed the permit after he had quit employment with our department and because he back dated the permit. A -K 4 -o 1991 CCP pQ 6 / 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81891 303/980-5070 .xvnreoaen -I ct,i 9 r Chen,@Northern# ,August 1990 Favid lambent P.O. Box2798 Aspen CO -2798 Subject: observation of Backhoe Pits for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Tract 55, Sec. 17, T.8S., R. 86W., Pitkin County, Colorado. -Job No. 4 473 90 Dear Mr. Lambert. As requested, Chen -Northern, Inc., observed backhoe pits that had been excavated at tho site. The data obtained and our reconccprr_lations nn the proposed construction and the subsurfttLz wi&ljtiGreS observed are presented in this report. The worn was conducted in accordance with our agu?Pment__fnr _nmfessic:nal Y__._..u.a_�.-a �..�.. �� vnon r.u. nrr7c.-c+o.vi +fio mf-on}•i al cMJISYtri fay .xarii_co w v, u..•�... ...ul ��, �.�•.. ..•------^^.— —__ _________._ geologic hazard inpacts on the propoead development have been addressed by others and no additional evaluation is requested. proposed Corot ction: We understand the proposed residence will be a two- story structure with a walkout basement level. The back foundation wall is proposed to be 16 feet luyli 1::, retain the hillside.. The building location is shown on Fig. 1. Foundation loadings tor this type -of !;rUvuLu u a W as WLF l to be relatively light to moderate. If building conditions, location or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recon[ endations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The proposed building site consists of vacant property to the east and above the present iambert residence. The property is located along the eastern valley perimeter in hilly terrain above the Holland Hills Subdivision. The building site spans a ridge as sham by the contour lines on Fig. 1. The ground surface slope is noderate to steep with about 20 feet of elevation difference across the building site. M -ie natural swales that cross the property could be ephemeral drainages that flow during spring runoff and thunderstocns. Vegetation consist= of grata:, wt ] , sagebrush aril srattp.re' ,rxl nine trees. Subsoil Conditions: The subsoil conditions in the area of the proposed residence were evaluated by obseiviux; ars--SIT7ing threp exploratory pits._ A fourth pit had been dug but was too steeply sided to log and sample the subsurface profile. The pits were reportedly excavated in the fall of 1989. The approximate pit locations are shown on Fig. 1. Logs of the subsoils observed are presented on Fig. 2. In general, the subsoils consisted of silty sands and gravels overlying sandstone and claystone/siltstone bedrock at depths of about 4 to 12 feet. The C, UA—, nt"a,ne HIH y�vowam>+^�= 57@C P„xt'Y � C12fwOJ,]'_ Cf.rv�S. f(Jpd00 tl %CJ . - 30394&-2363 30.794S2360 Fa.;,,ryk - ,ay\ \� .....44...• Subject: observation of Backhoe Pits for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Tract 55, Sec. 17, T.8S., R. 86W., Pitkin County, Colorado. -Job No. 4 473 90 Dear Mr. Lambert. As requested, Chen -Northern, Inc., observed backhoe pits that had been excavated at tho site. The data obtained and our reconccprr_lations nn the proposed construction and the subsurfttLz wi&ljtiGreS observed are presented in this report. The worn was conducted in accordance with our agu?Pment__fnr _nmfessic:nal Y__._..u.a_�.-a �..�.. �� vnon r.u. nrr7c.-c+o.vi +fio mf-on}•i al cMJISYtri fay .xarii_co w v, u..•�... ...ul ��, �.�•.. ..•------^^.— —__ _________._ geologic hazard inpacts on the propoead development have been addressed by others and no additional evaluation is requested. proposed Corot ction: We understand the proposed residence will be a two- story structure with a walkout basement level. The back foundation wall is proposed to be 16 feet luyli 1::, retain the hillside.. The building location is shown on Fig. 1. Foundation loadings tor this type -of !;rUvuLu u a W as WLF l to be relatively light to moderate. If building conditions, location or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recon[ endations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The proposed building site consists of vacant property to the east and above the present iambert residence. The property is located along the eastern valley perimeter in hilly terrain above the Holland Hills Subdivision. The building site spans a ridge as sham by the contour lines on Fig. 1. The ground surface slope is noderate to steep with about 20 feet of elevation difference across the building site. M -ie natural swales that cross the property could be ephemeral drainages that flow during spring runoff and thunderstocns. Vegetation consist= of grata:, wt ] , sagebrush aril srattp.re' ,rxl nine trees. Subsoil Conditions: The subsoil conditions in the area of the proposed residence were evaluated by obseiviux; ars--SIT7ing threp exploratory pits._ A fourth pit had been dug but was too steeply sided to log and sample the subsurface profile. The pits were reportedly excavated in the fall of 1989. The approximate pit locations are shown on Fig. 1. Logs of the subsoils observed are presented on Fig. 2. In general, the subsoils consisted of silty sands and gravels overlying sandstone and claystone/siltstone bedrock at depths of about 4 to 12 feet. The C, UA—, nt"a,ne HIH y�vowam>+^�= 9 AUG 9 '90 13:39 David Lambert ALcp22t..6, ..? 9411.. Page 2 FROM CHEN-NORTHERN GLNWD • C� PRGE.003 gVert>urden soils ar@ 9911uvlum denosited frca, weatheriw of tha ?Aa n Fnnnafinn that forms the eastern valley side in this area. obtained from the backhoe pits consisted of in-situ moisture content and dry density, gradation analysis and swell -consolidation testing. Tn general, the auLauil� lawn lvw wmmLr iL am►l 1e„51Ly. ReaulLs of lime swtll- consolidation tests, shown on Fig. 4, indicate the overburden subsoils are moderately compressible at their natural moisture contents and tend to collapse (gression upon wetting at constant light load) and have high compressibility under increased loading. The bedrock sample showed minor coirpressibility potential when loaded and wetted. A gradation analysis of the overburden soil (minus 3 -inch fraction) is shown on Fig. 5. laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was observed in the pits at time of our observation and the subsoils were slightly moist. Foundation Rezummmerdal:ivnL-3: Tits smilrsvily earrvuilrxui tzx�ibL of relaLively 1v density and highly copressible soils. Also, the soils encountered exhibit a collapse potential upon wetting which could cause differential foundation settlement and distress to the structure. The wetting could come from several sources including surface water infiltration or utility line leaks. The underlying bedrock is relatively incompressible. Based on our findings, we reconrntend spread footings placed entirely on the underlying bedrock for support of the residence. Footings placed on a combination of soil and bedrock should be expected to undergo differential settlement and result in building distress. The following design and construction criteria should be observed for a spread footing foundation system: 1) T'WLimwjs jJla�l u,m Llmr iK L.w al "µl R ;,ny 15G Qesign al usir-y a nna::inann bearing pressure of 4000 psf. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches. Based on experience and assumed typical foundation loadings, we expect settlement on the order of 1/2 inch. 2) Continuous foundations should be reinforced to span local anoralies and better withstand differential movement. We suggest the foundations be designed to span an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. 3) Foundations should be provided with adequate depth for frost protection. At least 42 inches of frost cover sha_11d he, aer-xeptabl e in this area. 4) The overburden soil and all loose or disturbed soil should be removed at footing grade and the bearing level extended dean to firm, undisturbed natural bedrock. 5) A raPircantativa. of the soil erYjinx=er ShWld irl r�civa uta Tv Alativ;' excavation prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. AUG' 9 19013:40 FROJ6HEN-NORTHERN GLNWD • PAGE.004 David lambert August 6, 1990 Page 3 Foundation and staining Walls: Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection snoulo tie cesignect mor a lateral earth pressure uaivuLe I ui, Ll,e La is of an equivalent miwu Ill LLL WC!,, 1, . vi 45 I/ f iVi ]A Ju Iii w.0 oLi wJ vi u•c on-site soils. Cantileverrxl retaining structures which are suets fr= the residenoo foundation and can be acted to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure ocaputed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate surcharge pressures such as traffic, snow storage, etc. The pressures reomumrerdecd above assure drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An undeidrain should be provided at the base.of the wall to prevent hydrostatic pressure b;iildup. Tito lateral rcoirtanea of footingz or retaining wail tonrings ::iiti L -e a combination of the sliding 1-esistanee of the footing on the foundation matarials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottom of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.45. Passive pressure against the sides of the footings can be calculated using a pressure of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above ams ultimate soil strerx3 h. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. wall backfill should be placed in thin horizontal lifts near opti=mum moisture content and oxnpacted to at least 90% of the naxiian standard Proctor density. ovez=rpaction of the backfill aril the use of large equipment behind the walls should be avoided, as this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. on site and uull br okon bodrock can be-11sed as baackfi-11 provided the 9veisize rock is removed and it is properly placed and compacted. slabs-on�rade: The natural on-site soils exclusive of topsoil can be used for suppurL of lie}ttly lxdad Slab on -gide mrw-tsuction_ The soils aYhihit tendencies to settle upon wetting and there is a risk of slab cracking. To reduce tl•,e effects of differential movement, slabs -on -grade should Lr separated flroln bearing walls arra co'_ s ::i«h e�^�; iT t_= rthi rh a].l ort. w1restxaxu %J r vertical movement. Slab joints should be provided to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking and the slabs should lx reinfol-c� according to their intended use. A 4 -inch layer of free draining gravel may be placed beneath slabs -on - grade for drainage. 'Ibis material should consist of aggregate with less than z% passluy U e Nv. 200 sieves and more than 50% rotainw'1 on tha No A siavp. Fill placed beneath slabs -on -grade should be a nonexpansive material conpacted to at least 95% of the maXiMM standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optiucauu. PLivl t,; Lill pleLeA nt, the grzxuL] cu face rh-kI by removing all topsoil and any existing. fill or debris, adjusting to near optinmmmoisture content and compacting to at least 95% of the maxiumnnn standard lG c R!JG 9 '90 13:41 FRtCHEN-NORTHERN GLNWD • PRGE.005 David Lambert August 6, 1990 loge 4 Proctor density. The natural on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and ovexsized rock should be suitable for• as< ,.s Underdrain System: Groundwater was not observed in the pits excavated at the site and it appears unlikely that groundwrter due to natural causes will occur at the cite. .Due to changes in the surfaces featur----ayyl•rt .3ff p tt�s-at.th: - site after development, there could be a potential for perched water development after construction. Thercforc, ore rcocmnnend tho below grado aro,.ac of tho building be protected by an urderdrain system. The undezm1rain should consist of a perforated pipe embedded in a free -draining gravel. The drainpipe should hays an invest level et lw�iL l twL 14alvw Ql l,rw A siSljiw iit 91wi lml oy excavation grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. In soil ��,a,'i il<'Vt%Lvirus i M1LMIR4 such as 20 mil PVC ehauld M placed below the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting below foundation level. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and under'slab areas should be avoided during construction. to uL least 951 of tho maxirrtm ctandard k7octor aenailcy in pavement ar> slab areas arra to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away fiat the foundation in all directions. We recrommpd a min== slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a mini um of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in Waved areas. _ 4) Roof downspouts and drains should di.s-ce well beyond the limits of all facirtill . 5) LardKcapim) which reU.drPs typiral irrigation and lawn 5grinufl r head should be located at least 10 feet from foundation walls to limit surface water infiltration. Limitations: This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices in this area for use by the client for design purposes. The conclusions and reconmiendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 ary-1 the--— e of—r>.-itruction. The nature and extent of subsurface variations across the site may not beceme evident until excavation is performed. If during construction, fill, soil, rock or water conditions appear to be different from those described in this report, this nffioe Shetld be s%(;h�- at once so reevaluation of the recom er<3ations may be AUG 9 190 13:42 David Lambert August 6, 1990 Page 5 4 FR06CHEN-NORTHERN GLNWD • t PAGE.006 made. We reocu mnd on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata by a r%nmsentative of the soil engineer. Sincerely, fN N r,Jca•srr,,*'..rr Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. &1 QEp01 Reviewed By Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. SLP/ec Cr: Sf.an Math9a Arvhii-xr-hin At -Fn> F.Y•nSo Mitre... %a 0 Fa:JG 9 190 13:42 FRbCHEN-NORTHERN GLNWD EXISTING RESIDENCE I 1� • i 3O'SETBACK i i, PRGE.007` APPROXIMATE SCALE I" = 80' 112 14 473 90 1 Chen@Northern,lnc. I LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS I FIg. I I' AUG 9 190 13:43 FROM CHEN-NORTHERN GLNWD Pit 1 Pit 2 Elev. = 81' Elev. = 98' 100 95 .E m uv 75 70 65 WW +4=45 -200=17 PRGE.0081 Pit 3 Elev. = 96' WCA DD-1 03q 3b ��Db 121 200=46 Note: Explanation of symbols presented on Fig. 3. 100 85-j w a t J �, 75 70 I// 1 14 473 90 l ChenONorthem,lnc. I Logs of Exploratory Pits I Fig. 2 w F+UG+ 9 ISO i3:43 LDGFSID: FR?6CHEN-NORTHERN GLNWD PRGE.009 Sand (SM); silty, gravelly, loose to medium dense, slightly moist, red. a Sand and (ravel (SM-4GM); silty sand matrix, cobbles, loose to medium dense, slightly moist, red, subangular. ® Weathered randtone Ecdznck; medium hard, moist, red. WRWeathered claystone-Siltstone Bedrock; sandy, medium hard, moist, mixed brown. �1 Hand driven liner sample. ' -blaLu,.L J Lulk x Plc. NOTES: 1. acplo:attay pits were observed on July 13, 1990. The pits ;<.: :.pen for Quito caro time. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measurd approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate anly to the degree implied by the method used. t. 5. No free water was observed in the pits. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 6. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) Ttrw rl nai tv irr-fi .. ... ...... ... +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent gassing No. 200 sieve 4 473 90 j aenCiNorthem,Inc Legend and Notes Fig. 3 T 1a O N i" 4 5 6 0 3 rKUM CHEN-NORTHERN GLNWD E PAGE. 010 AF'F'LICU F'Hh 111 IF(r - Kcr Dry Unit Weight = 103 pcf Sampleof: Silty $,and matrix From: Pit 3 at 3 feet Ell MOM I IN 11111 No ill = 1111 I Bill 1 11 1 1 1111111 11111 11111MEN AF'F'LICU F'Hh 111 IF(r - Kcr 4 473 90 [ /(–a I CA -1-79 AVrLICU 1'111Z, lO NIZ — KSI Chen -Northern, Inr SWFi.i ,�(1t�Is(yJpATJ�� TFST.RESl1LIS.,.F19: 4_. _ I mitimure Content - 14 percent Dry Unit Weight = 121 Pcf From: Pit 3 at 4 feet Ell MOM I milli 11 1 111 IS 11 'MEN 111111 4 473 90 [ /(–a I CA -1-79 AVrLICU 1'111Z, lO NIZ — KSI Chen -Northern, Inr SWFi.i ,�(1t�Is(yJpATJ�� TFST.RESl1LIS.,.F19: 4_. _ I Chen -Northern, Inc. TAB L E I SUMMARY, OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 4 473 90 SANM E IOCA'ION NATURAL N0191URE CONTENT I%) NMURAL 011Y OEN9ITY IPCFI OMOAT101 PERCENT 1'ASSINU NO. PJ SIEVE RTER[IERO UMITS UNCONFlNEO OOAIMIE99NE SIHENOTN W) Sell C•R MEOROCN TYPE IIT UE"ll 1") GRR (""I SAND I��) LI(1J11 LIWII ALASIK:ITY INIIEE 1 8-9 1 45 38 17 silty sand b gravel 2 6.5 2 96 46 silty Sand aatr� X 3 3 4 103 silty sand 4 14 121 claystme, sand 0 November 19, 1993 David Lambert 571 Holland Hills road Basalt, CO 81621 RE: Tract 55, S17,T8S, R86W Parcel ID# 2467-174-00-012 Dear David, 16,. ASPEN • PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT This letter is to confirm the upgrade on your septic system on 10/5/93. This upgrade was inspected and was built in compliance with Pitkin County code to serve 5 bedrooms - four bedrooms in the main house and one bedroom in an employee unit. Sincerely, huoJ NancyMa enzie, HealtW Officer ,. 130 Som GALENA STREET • AsPEN, COLORADO 81611 • PHONE 303.920.5070 • FAx 303.920.5197 m�m� yd�pye. Date Bill +�• •.. •.LIZ • .:+—M ' &/ E� Check/Receipt Number Inspection Requested By Original Report To Be Sent Copy Of Report To Be Sent To Property Owne Parcel ID Number 2-471-46 -0 Legal 1/4, 1/4, Sec.—L7--r T _Sr Lot , Block , Filing Subdivision— Address 0.571 u bo N)D Building Occupied Vacant Date Septic Tank Last Pumped -34 Age Of Building '1 yr --N A Bedrooms --2 DEPARTMENT RE(XHRDS: Permit Number SfOU�" Year Issued r'(-) No Records F and Septic Tank Capacity 1,900 (Gallons) Septic Tank Material n/ G Leach Field Size 360 (Sq. Ft.) Leach Field 6C I NS'PBMON- Date Of Inspection � � Inspector Soil Conditions: D Other Saturated Snow Covered Oer Septic System: Functi ng Satisfactorily Not Functioning Comments: Water Supply: Public: Name Private: Well , Spring , Cistern , Surface , Other \ Well Construction Arid Location: Approved J Unapproved Because_ Bacteriological Water Test: Lab Number Acceptable Other A.P.E.H.D.:4/87 /a/eq L m v•,\, e.Y+ L O A