Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.eh.246534401015 (1996)Document Layout (From Most Recent to Oldest Permit) Permit Application Log Sheet/Notes & Photos Communications As -built Design Engineer Design Soil Information Water Permit & Information Second System on property Third System etc. Floor Plans Please See Building and Land Use Approvals Files for additional information. ASPITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPAF -NT F,PPLIr ION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSA�STEM 130 S. Galena SL, Aspen Colorado 61611 i� Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970-92o-5039 Permit # V /� Parcel ID # Permit For. New Installation (p Repair ( ) Remodel () Emergency Use ( ) Name of OWNER Y �za VA Owners Mailing Address Business Phone: S p D Z Home Phone: Name of Agent nAe., Agent's Mailing Address Y (Z a''1.'L.i �� ^ Q C.ro, Business Phone: •-ll S,QZzC/ Cell Phone: Fax: q20 QIrl Copy of permit to be sent to: Owner ( ) Agent (✓) Both ( ) Street Address 7 ` - Legal Description: Lot Block ,Subdivision r n C Size of lot: _CL� acres Type of proposed structure: Size of bldg. envelope: Total areailiving space (sq. ft): C h C:iQ # of Bedrooms, offices and similar size :rooms: Caretaker Unit : Attached Detached # of Bedrooms offices and similar size rooms: Water. Private well( )Spring ( )Stream(( ) Community/Public (Name of System) Is Proof of Adequate Water Attached T ( V) Yes ( )/No Has this project been approved by Pitkin County T M Yes ( ) No Is a copy of the floor plan attached( required ) 7 (y Yes ( ) No Application for an Individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. The undersigned arknoWedges that the above information Is We and that false Information will invalidate the application and any subsequentpermit. I morin of the partnit does nor ropy true approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin Courmy codes. No construction may be urd until all a (royals nd pernits have been obtained. The owner assumes all responsibilities erase of (allure or inadequacy of this system. Signature of applicant A IDate "(� For department use below / / tank capacity: gallons s- r s qr' s •s Absorption area: sq. ft. w ` a ly9(s y wawa, . Y- 1a + Design by Engineer Required 7 ()Q Yes( ) No All plans and spedfications of the engineer must be followed. Any changes must be approved in writing and the engineer must ceRtd•/yrthe� final install tion to the Environmental Health Department in writing, p Permit approval by: LO//LG( �� �$r�•r�i Dale y — g / Plans and specifications of the pipposed individual a disposal systerh have reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indraled n aocordWOOLVolh the Pitkin Count' ISDS R14utaton in effect at the lime of issue. This permit becomes Invalid 6 months from the dale Mat me permit was Issued unless system construclan has commenced or an eslension has been approved n wring by the Department. Installer. bra -eat" As -Built drawings must -be included with this permit before the final approval will be Issued Final Inspection Approval: �3g t4/' Dale: 16 - h - & Date requested: /Q _1`1_ QL Date Pd.: Receipt #: U f r Received by: Information complete:(- % j - yj�r 1 or Ioc.0 a • ASPWKITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPLIN FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGt DISPOSASSTEM 130 S. Galena SL, Aspen Colorabo 81611 Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970-920-5039 Permit d Z6 V fD Parcel ID 9 �2 L/ /p ,rj — 3'/ L/ - n / - O / � Permit For. New Installation (0 Repair ( ) Remodel ( ) Emergency Use ( ) Business Phone: q2 5,g • d Name of Agent v1- rS Agent's Mailing Address Z -t, c Q Business Phone : ZZ Cell Phone : (2- I Fax: ZO 3rz Copy of permit to be sent to: Owner ( ) Agent (✓) Both ( ) Street Address Legal Description: Lot Ll1 i /itiiy(tBlorJ�_ I pt ZId •6ebdgiisie`p C Size of lot: -CL4 acresTypeof t7 proposed structure: Size of bldg. envelope: Total arealliving space (sq. ft): f G v C of Bedrooms, offices and similar size :rooms: Water(_)Privale well( )Spring( )Stream ( ) C rnmuntty/Pubfic (Name of System) Is Proof of Adequate Water Attached ? ( V/) Yes ( )//No Has this project been approved by Pitkin County ? Yes ( ) No Is a copy of the floor Ian attached (required 7 ,M y Yes ( ) No Application for an Individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted The undersigned adutowiedges Mail the above kdorlrrelion is true and Mal false InformetIon will invalidate the application and any subsequent permit. I sada of the Palo* does not lmplyta approval of any other permit required for construction codes. No construction may be and adA all a rovab hit pe,nds have been obtained. The awry e, Y resparhaWfles in rase d falters or Inadequacy assumpursuant to PAW County of this system. Signature of applicant Date For department use below / -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- capacity: gallons Absorption area: / cor..L ,P.�2'l�- r.J E o • F.�irn.e.L / 9,.,�e, yL,�.L7r.i D so r 4 � G �rw+a�-- P.t;tlu:- / 5 b S / ►leve-�l.�1-aG Y�� � sq. ft. Design by Engineer Required ? Yes ( ) No All plans and specifications of the engineer must be followed. Any changes must be approved in writing and the engineer must ceffify the final instal tion to the Environmental Health Department in writing. p / Penni[ approval by: Date Pons and specxicetions of he Ixppossd individual sevAe disposal systech terve be rarbwed and an, oe,siderod saWt. Permission is hereby granted to the owner err Na agent to perform the work indurated In scoordanceLvoth the Pitkin Cony ISDS Rbilulafian In effect at the time of issue. This pemvl becomes invalid 6 months frim the dale Mat Me Penna was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has bee, approved in v,rdiq by we DeparlmmL Installer. brd- iQcr- As•Built drawings mus Included with this permit before the final approval will be Issued. Final Inspection Approval: Ll", Lieo Date: 16— /I —& Date requested: /d — q— OFb Date Pd.: Receipt m%: r IF Received by: Inflammation complete: 1-1 � - 399270 11/20/1996 04:08P GG 1 OF I REC DOC 3 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER 6.00 NOT r I �KC �i10 r""�1'rF_�:a s �� s - r 1 _ � .. M � f_ I l Z M��/{ +f a �/� V' a .i� ► r � � � �: 1. S� i �� a' FF ( � • H -. i�l Y 'Z�I��� \ - ��, . ,�. - . - _ - ? � _ �. ♦� _ � _ � t.�- rii _-r .. ._ _ .. i ij 1 r_� j • i e � r7_+ mo 0 S 1 n ' •� ��" I�'-• .tom -. p Ll `s E 1 `s I •!l `AI -I-V�k i �� �.� ,� --rte- AA -d=. 4 � t /1 rte.. • lip �•lJ- r . 41 F-•=-�,i--fes,,. ♦ s v�i'�" - ,• � J. . _ i AC _ 40*1 C,'I A0, jv- P -C, • �, f �4,4,e4�- • IU U )Iuo� • • ja r :, :, K... t ' . ' , :r _� � )IL4-1� v � � 1 .' !g 1 �� � �� �' '1 � � i _- „ � r a - '. e f. -�. Y• - k lA ' ��X/ S '. v x ��. d* a,v `� _ �. - eJ, y� {tet 'r t• - f�l , '�.- I M it r i � �1 _ e ` � � � + � �I I I� � 1 t1r xti, `.�. . -_ i� � F �1 � I � t j E i �� � ' v ,,, _ �.`. r. z.��4S1 P r R ` i � • � ;P�r� ` ... Ay. '+lam' �. / � !' ' .�.. , 1 �4�. .- _ j• I. ; i� � I � I y �- � ` 4 IMAP H� Y 11 i I s• •1• t A ��. �' �1� Ir� 1 � ~pq�r r � , ' "� �� u ,.aLi �-- '�' mss•` r r x \ .95 5 '� g5 S .f a,y �p�`. .ter'VA %w`�+!' ,� �� 1; 14�''F PY"i �i!'� 4I: tii 14, 14 i C� 0 {ATTENTION This Individual Sewage Disposal System is considered a DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM For information regarding the Moisture Reports, please refer to the Drip Irrigation file under W for water, then ISDS. Thank you! 39 rM_,,77a71,7 E E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS November 15, 1996 Mike Morgan c/o Tony Rutgers 512 Spruce Street Aspen, CO 81611 Subject: OWS Installation Observation Parcel 42, Sopris Mountain Ranch, Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Morgan, 0 II NOV 2 1996 ENVIRONMEN (AL HEALTH ASPEN / PITKIN Ed Church and our representative Bob Nelson observed the installation of the repair OWS at the subject site during October and November, 1996. The purpose of our observation was to confirm the repair was installed in conformance with our upgrade design dated May 20, 1996. The drip -irrigation trenches were installed in the general conformance with the design. The uppermost two 100 foot long trenches were installed as four 50 foot long trenches as indicated on the attached Fig. 2. The area of the drip irrigation field is 4000 SF. A surge tank with five distribution outlets was installed. If there are any questions, please call. E. O. CHURCH, O� PO,CHEG Edward O. h- -.0 U 9 P 3 copies se F•sS /�F cc: Pitkin Co N cc: Bob Nelson th Department, ATTN: 43 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218.1407 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 8323517 Nancy NacKenzie P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80437-2869 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 10-07-1996 11:37AM FROM E.O. CHURCH-MERRITT HOUSE TO • PARCEL, a42 • SOPPIS MOUNTAIN RANCH PM<IN COUNTY, COLORADO r r r r 1 1 I \ 1 1 1 19709205197 P.02 SCALE � r 1 LIFT STATION \ WITH SCREErED O 1250 GALLON \ I PLUMP VAULT TWO COMPARTMENT \ SEPTIC TANK \\\ 1 4 INCH PVC SEWER LINE \ 1 I 2 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 1 1 1 � EXISTING WATER WELL GRAVEL r \ PARKING AREA / EXIST 2000 GALLON WATER STORAGE TANK EXTEND DRAIN TO BELOW WELL ` L JOB Na 6720 FIG. 2 (� I TOTAL P.02 1 OARCEL &42 0 SCALE SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH 1 =40 PITKW COUNTY. COLORADO I ` i 25' \ SURGE TANK LIFT STATION \ I 25 1250 BALLON WITH SCF£ENED 28 TWO COMPARTMENT PUMP VAULT SEPTIC TANK 4 INCH PVC SEWER LINE ` CLEANOUT \ I 2 BEDROOM RESIDENCE t EXISTING GRAVEL WATER WELL PARKING AREA 2000 GALCON V WATER STORAGE _ TANK r r q LOCATION OF AS -BUILT OWS FIG. 2 r; ti24&5- 394 - M- CAIS' CH&CH & AssociatesInc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS February 14, 2000 Mike Morgan 3949 Austin Road Brawley, CA 89227 Subject: Drip Irrigation Onsite Wastewater System - Soil Moisture Testing Parcel 42, Sopris Mountain Ranch Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Morgan, We visited the subject site on July 14, 1999 to obtain the soil moisture samples as required by the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department OWS permit. The results of observations indicate the OWS is operating adequately. Observation of the drain field during our visit indicated no surfacing of effluent nor condition, that would suggest the system is not functioning properly. The results of the moisture testing is attached If there are any questions, please call. Sincerely, CHURCH & Associates, Edward O. Church, 'u' 13172 3 copies sent -°iONAI- EOC/trp copy to: APE[ ID, Attn: Nancy MacKenzie copy to: Tony Rutgers 512 Spruce Street Aspen, CO 81611 DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 1 ' 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 1 TABLE I - SOIL MOI TESTING RESULTS • DRIP IRRIGATION ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM SAMPLE LOCATION* SOIL DRY DENSITY MOISTURE % SATURATION TYPE PCF CONTENT,% NOVEMBER, 1996 1 TRENCH 12 @ 18' TOPSOIL 33 57.3 38 2 TRENCH 12 @ 30' ORG CLAY 42 64.2 70 3 TRENCH 6 @ 50' ORG CLAY 66 34.7 59 4 TRENCH 10 @ 15' ORG CLAY 60 41.8 62 JUNE 19, 1997 CLAY 70 33.3 64 1 TRENCH 7 rr 18' ORG CLAY 65 22.1 37 2 TRENCH 7 @ 100' ORG CLAY 71 26.0 51 3 TRENCH 14 @ 70' ORG CLAY 64 16.9 28 4 TRENCH 17 @ 50' ORG CLAY 62 32.5 54 MAY 28, 1998 I TRENCH 22 @ 80' ORG CLAY 71** 42.9 84 2 TRENCH 17 @ 40' ORG CLAY 71** 38.0 74 3 TRENCH 16 @ 80' CLAY 71** 30.5 60 4 TRENCH 11 @ 20' ORG CLAY 71** 39.9 78 JULY 14, 1999 1 SW CORNER CLAY, SANDY 80 22.7 55 2 NW CORNER CLAY, SILTY 80*** 33.6 82 3 NE CORNER CLAY 74 22.4 48 4 SE CORNER CLAY 72**** 22.9 47 5 NE CORNER CLAY 70 33.3 64 *Sample location refers to general area of drain field sample was collected **Density based on the maximum prior density, which determines maximum saturation ***Dry density was assumed from Sample 1 ****Dry density is average of Samples 3 and 5 JOB NO. 6720 q q • E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS July 21, 1997 Ilj a�4 s- 3 YY- a /'O/ Mike Morgan �( ' JUL 2 5 1997 3949 Austin Road ENVI __i Brawley, CA 89227 RODI,�EN A�H�AL7i1 Subject: Drip Irrigation Onsite Wastewater System Soil Moisture Testing Parcel 42, Sopris Mountain Ranch Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Morgan, I have been at the lot on June 19, 1997 to obtain the soil moisture samples as required by the Pitkin County OWS permit and on July 17, 1997 to observe final grading. The results are moisture testing is attached. The results of observations indicate the OWS is operating adequately. At the June 19, 1997 visit, there were 2 situations which needed attention which were: 1. installing the surface drainage swale above the house, and 2. filling over PVC distribution pipe which is not exposed. On July 17 we visited the site and all items had been corrected. Topsoil had been brought in. The revegatation should progress well with the observed conditions. If there are any E. O. CHURCH, INC. O. Church, 3 copies sent b6s" Please call. J- 3172 7� zz-?7.. cc: Pitkin County Environmental Health, ATTN: Nancy MacKenzie cc: NEWS, LTD, ATTN: Bob Nelson cc: Tony Rutgers 512 Spruce Street Aspen, CO 81611 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80437-2869 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832J517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 * Trenches numbered from bottom and distance is from manifold in feet. JOB NO. 6720 • TABLE I - SOILS MOISTURE TESTING RESULTS DRIP IRRIGATION ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM NOVEMBER, 1996 SAMPLE LOCATION* SOIL DRY DENSITY MOISTURE $ SATURATION TYPE PCF CONTENT, $ 1 TRENCH 12 @ 18' TOPSOIL 33 57.3 38 2 TRENCH 12 @ 30' ORGANIC CLAY 42 64.2 70 3 TRENCH 6 @ 50' ORGANIC CLAY 66 34.7 59 4 TRENCH 10 @ 15' ORGANIC CLAY 60 41.8 62 JUNE 19, 1997 1 TRENCH 7 @ 18' ORGANIC CLAY 65 22.1 37 2 TRENCH 7 @ 100' ORGANIC CLAY 71 26.0 51 3 TRENCH 14 @ 70' ORGANIC CLAY 64 16.9 28 4 TRENCH 17 @ 50' ORGANIC CLAY 62 32.5 54 * Trenches numbered from bottom and distance is from manifold in feet. JOB NO. 6720 EOC • E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS August 5, 1996 ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ATTN: Nancy MacKenzie and Tom Dunlop 130 Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 F Subject: Soil Moisture Monitoring V Drip Irrigation OWS Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 672P Dear Mr. Dunlop, • o 1 AUG 14 i ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH p iPEN , PITKIN We are submitting the foliowing soil moisture monitoring program for the proposed drip irrigation OWS in Pitkin County for the experimental drip irrigation systems. Base line soils data would be obtained at OWS construction. The test- ing would include moisture and density of the native soil. A minimum of 5 soil moisture samples would be obtained and tested dur- ing May of each year. One sample must be from a drip irrigation sec- tion which is open and one may be from the section which is closed. The three remaining samples would be randomly obtained from trench areas based on a random number generator system. The samples would be obtained from a depth of 12 to 30 inches using a JMC BACKSAVER SOIL SAMPLER or AMS SOIL RECOVERY PROBE. Based on the soil moisture test- ing a report indicating: 1. location of tests, 2. moisture/density and 3. percent saturation will be reported. If the percent saturation exceeds 90% in two of the three samples and there is no evidence of surfacing, additional samples will be obtained in August. Any evi- dence -of surfacing would first require closing of that section of the field and monitoring. If there are any questions, please call. E. O. CHURCH, INC. Edward O. Church, P.E. 2 copies sent Ll 925 East 17th Avdffje • Denver, Colorado 80218.1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80437-2869 (303) 832.9692 FAX (303) 932-3517 (303) 674.0660 FAX(303)674-0813 Fa0 • Recycled Paper CNN Tri-County Health Department WPM wpm% Serving Adams, Arapahoe and Douglas Counties I uuL 2 91996 July 25, 1996 I Nancy MacKenzie Environmental Health Officer Aspen -Pitkin Environmental Health Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Review of Proposed Moisture Monitoring for Drip Irrigation OWS Parcel 42, Sopris Mountain Ranch Dear Nancy: I recommend the following additional requirements and information about the plan be provided by E. O. Church, Inc. 1. To avoid sampling bias, sample locations should be selected randomly. This could be accomplished by establishing a grid system over the absorption field, numbering the grid cells, and using a random number generator to select locations for moisture content measurement. 2. The method to be used to obtain undisturbed samples should be specified. 3. A minimum of 5 soil moisture samples be taken, to better evaluate moisture conditions within the absorption field. 4. The test methods by which moisture and density will be determined should be specified. 5 Percent saturation is typically calculated using the moisture content, density and specific gravity of the soil. The specific gravity values must be accurate if an accurate estimate of percent saturation is to be determined. A sufficient number of specific gravity tests should be run to determine which values to use in calculating percent saturation. Sincerely, Warren S. Brown, P.E. Public Health Engineer L + O 7000 East Belleview Avenue, Suite 301 ❑ Englewood, Colorado 80111-1628 C (303) 220-9200 o FAX (303) 220-9208 Fa0 • Recycled Paper ® Tri -County Health Department WPM rim Serving Adams, Arapahoe and Douglas Counties INVOICE * * * INVOICE * * * INVOICE * * * INVOICE INVOICE # E-163 July 26, 1996 BILL TO: Aspen -Pitkin EH Department Ms Nancy MacKenzie 130 S Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 TOTAL DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCTS AND/OR SERVICES COSTS Date of Service: July, 1996 Parcel 42, Sopris Mtn Ranch Review Moisture Monitoring Plan 2 hours @ $45.00 90.00 BALANCE DUE 90.00 For Accounting Use Only: 680-509500 90.00 Invoice Prepared by: Debbie Shissler, 3031220-9200 x16 Please Mail Remittance Attn: Business Office to: 7000 East Belleview Avenue, Suite 301 ❑ Englewood, Colorado 80111-1628 4 "!n (303) 220-9200 o FAX (303) 220-9208 • • RecWed Paper ® Tri-County Health Department Serving Adams, Arapahoe and Douglas Counties INVOICE * * * INVOICE * * * INVOICE * * * INVOICE INVOICE # E-163 July 26, 1996 BILL TO: Aspen -Pitkin EH Department Ms Nancy MacKenzie 130 S Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 TOTAL DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCTS AND/OR SERVICES COSTS Date of Service: July, 1996 Parcel 42, Sopris Mtn Ranch Review Moisture Monitoring Plan 2 hours @ $45.00 90.00 BALANCE DUE 90.00 For Accounting Use Only: 680-509500 90.00 Invoice Prepared by: Debbie Shissler, 3031220-9200 x16 Please Mail Remittance Attn: Business Office to: 7000 East Belleview Avenue, Suite 301 ❑ Englewood, Colorado 80111-1628 SO V (303) 220-9200 0 FAX (303) 220-9208 EOC', n E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS July 17, 1996 Mike Moraan, c/o Tonv Rutaers 512 Spruce Street Aspen, CO 81511 Subject: Soil Moisture Monitoring Drip Irriaation OWS Parcel 42, SoDris Mountain Ranch Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Moraan, We are submittina the followina soil the proposed drip irrigation OWS. letter of Mav 20, 1996. 0 A juL 2 91996 RONIfENTAL HEALTH ASPEN; PITKIN moisture monitoring program for The system was desianed in our Base line soils data would be obtained at OWS construction. The test- ina would include moisture and densitv of the native soil. We propose a minimum of 3 soil moisture samples be obtained and tested during Mav of each year. Two of the three samples must be from drip irrigation sections which are open and one may be from the section which is closed. Two of the samples should be from within the trench areas and one should be from native undisturbed soil areas. The sam- ples will be obtained from a depth of 12 to 30 inches. Based on the soil moisture testina a report indicating: 1. location of tests. 2. moisture/densitv and 3. percent saturation will be reported. If the percent saturation exceeds 90% in two of the three samples and there is no evidence of surfacina, additional samples will be obtained in August. Anv_ evidence of surfacina would first require closing of that section of the field and monitoring. If there are anv E. O. CHURCH, Edward O. Church, Geoloaical Enaine 3 copies sent cc: Aspen/Pitkin Health cc: Nelson Environmental cc: TCHD, Warren Brown 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832.3517 call. 72 Department, ATTN: Nancy McKensie and Wastewater Svstems P.O. Box 2868 • tvergreen, umoraoc (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 80437-2869 EOC 0 0 E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS July 17, 1996 ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ATTN: Tom Dunlop 130 Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Subject: Soil Moisture Monitorin4_ Drip Irrigation OWS Pitkin County_, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Dunlop, We are submitting the following soil moisture monitarinq program for the proposed drip_ irrigation OWS in Pitkin Countv for the experimental drip irrigation systems. Base line soils data would be obtained at OWS construction. The test- ing would include moisture and densitv of the native soil. We propose a minimum of 3 soil moisture samples be obtained and tested during Mav of each year. Two of the three samples must be from drip irrigation sections which are open and one may be from the section which is closed. Two of the samples should be from within the trench areas and one should be from native undisturbed soil areas. The sam- ples would be obtained from a depth of 12 to 30 inches. Based on the soil moisture testing_ a report indicating: 1. location of tests, 2. moisture/densitv and 3. percent saturation will be reported. If the percent saturation exceeds 90% in two of the three samples and there is no evidence of surfacing, additional samples will be obtained in Auqust. Anv evidence of surfacing would first reauire closing of that section of the field and monitoring. If there are any qu ggEf',N ease call. E. O. CHURCH, 13172 Edward O. Church, 'E ; Geological Engine �^F,'.........•:aG�� 2 copies sent 926 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218.1407 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3617 P.O. Box 2869 (303) 674-0660 80437-2869 EOC 0 E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS JulV 17, 1996 ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ATTN: Tom Dunlop 130 Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Subject: Soil Moisture Monitoring Drip Irrigation OWS Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Dunlop, 0 We are submitting the followinq soil moisture monitoring program for the proposed drip_ irrigation OWS in Pitkin Countv for the experimental drip irrigation systems. Base line soils data would be obtained at OWS construction. The test- ing would include moisture and density of the native soil. We propose a minimum of 3 soil moisture samples be obtained and tested during Mav of each year. Two of the three samples must be from drip irrigation sections which are open and one may be from the section which is closed. Two of the samples should be from within the trench areas and one should be from native undisturbed soil areas. The sam- ples would be obtained from a depth of 12 to 30 inches. Based on the soil moisture testing_ a report indicating: 1. location of tests, 2. moisture/density and 3. percent saturation will be reported. If the percent saturation exceeds 90% in two of the three samples and there is no evidence of surfacing, additional samples will be obtained in August. AnV evidence of surfacing would first reauire closing of that section of the field and monitoring. F C e call. 2 copies sent 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 e.u. eox zotia • cvergreen, Uoioraoc (303) 832.9692 FAX (303) 832.3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 E.O. CACH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS June 8, 1998 Mike Morgan 3949 Austin Road Brawley, CA 89227 /101Z,6 -AV/ -3`t4-o/-ols Subject: Drip Irrigation Onsite Wastewater System Soil Moisture Testing Parcel 42, Sopris Mountain Ranch Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Morgan, We visited the field, and to Pitkin County attached. The adequately. )LSEP 1 0 1998 ENVIROR'iLh�,�; ; ASPEN N':AD�j ,.,, site on May 28, 1998 to observe the drip irrigation obtain the soil moisture samples as required by the OWS permit. The results of moisture testing are results of observations indicate the OWS is operating If there are any questions, please call. E. O. CHURCH, INC. v, G. Edward O. Church, P.T.' 13172 ir 3 copies sent FSS�ON'` O cc: Pitkin County Enviro►imental Health, ATTN: cc: NEWS, LTD, ATTN: Bob Nelson cc: Tony Rutgers 512 Spruce.Street Aspen, CO 81611 Nancy MacKenzie 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218.1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80437.2869 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 69 r L � TABLE I - SOILS M*URE TESTING RESULTS DRIP IRRIGATION ONSITE WASTEWATER STEM Col'/ D4.1.3 D1 jjjGYIC SAMPLE LOCATION* ORGANIC SOIL DRY DENSITY MOISTURE % SA770 ORGANIC CLAY 71* 38.0 74 TYPE 16 @ 80' PCF CONTENT, % 1 TRENCH 12 @ 18' TOPSOIL 39.9 33 57.3 2 TRENCH 12 @ 30' ORGANIC CLAY 42 64.2 3 TRENCH 6 @ 50' ORGANIC CLAY 66 34.7 4 TRENCH 10 @ 15' ORGANIC CLAY 60 41.8 JUNE 19, 1997 1 TRENCH 7 @ 18' ORGANIC CLAY 65 22.1 37 2 TRENCH 7 @ 100' ORGANIC CLAY 71 26.0 51 3 TRENCH 14 @ 70' ORGANIC CLAY 64 16.9 28 4 TRENCH 17 @ 50' ORGANIC CLAY 62 32.5 54 MAY 28, 1998 1 TRENCH 22 @ 80' ORGANIC CLAY 71* 42.9 84 2 TRENCH 17 @ 40' ORGANIC CLAY 71* 38.0 74 3 TRENCH 16 @ 80' CLAY 71* 30.5 60 4 TRENCH 11 @ 20' ORGANIC CLAY 71* 39.9 78 * Density based on the maximum prior density which determines maximum saturation. * Trenches numbered from bottom and distance is from manifold in feet. JOB NO. 6720 July 17, 1996 ASPEN • PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT We have been notified that you are going to install a Drip Irrigation sewage disposal system for your property and we want to be sure that you, the property owner, understand what this means. This,is an alternative method of wastewater disposal not provided for in the Pitkin County Regulations. As,such, it has been declared an experimental system and the.installation of a total of eight such systems have been approved. Attached is a copy of Resolution #96-134 which was adopted by the Pitkin County Board of Commissioners, acting as the Pitkin County Board of Health. We request that you read the -conditions of the. resolution and sign the bottom of this letter stating that you understand these conditions. We have taken these precautions because Drip Irrigation is an experimental system in this area. Several hundred of these systems have been installed on the -Eastern Slope. However, we do not have historical data to know how the system will perform at this altitude and in the extreme and varying weather conditions we experience. Some conditions that must be met before we can issue your septic permit are as follows; • If a "water balance " method of calculating waste load is applied, a monitoring plan inust be.submitted to determine saturation status of soils. • A bond must be posted to assure the system is installed, has a final inspection performed by the design engineer, and that a - final `as -built' drawing is provided to this department. It has been determined that the bond must.be for one and a half (1-1/2) times the'amount of the installation cost of the system.. t Aftdr installation, you must provide a written report to this Department documenting maintenance on the system for a period of Ifive and submitted to this Department in January of each yea 7a� qG � ass— • ��. Owner Signature Addresso Prope 130 Sourx GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 89611 PHONE 303.920.5090 • ' FAx 303.920.5197 I�.ea�wrv• - �J E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS May 20, 1996 Mike Morgan c/o Tony Rutgers 512 Spruce Street Aspen, CO 81611 Subject: Onsite Wastewater System Design Parcel 42, Sopris Mountain Ranch Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dcar Mr. Morgan, 0 As requested, we have reviewed subsurface conditions and percolation tests performed at the subject site by Nelson Environmental and Waste- water Solutions, Ltd., (Nelson) dated September 7, 1995. The purpose of our review was to evaluate subsurface conditions and to design an Onsite Wastewater System (OWS). SITE CONDITIONS - The site is an approximate 1.48 acre parcel in a rural area cf Pitkin County, Colorado. The location of the proposed residence, profile pit and percolation tests are presented on Fig. 1. The slope at the proposed field area is 16% to the east. The ground surface has a moderate cover of grass and native vegetation. We met with Nancy MacKensie of the Pitkin County Health Department on May 9, 1996 to discuss sun and wind exposure at the site. It was de- termined the site is not in a confined drainage area and has moderate solar exposure and good wind exposure. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - A 2 bedroom residence is under construction as indicated on Figs. 1 and 2. The cabin is being constructed under a E -T design, with the intent to change to a drip irrigation OWS. The cabin has less then 2000 square feat (SF). The sewage loading for a 2 bel - room dwelling is 300 gallons per day (GPD), 525 GPD with a 1.75 fac- tor, to determine the design load. The design loading includes a gar- bage grinder, dish washer and washing machine. The site will be served water by a well near the southwest corner of the parcel, which is 140 feet from the proposed drip irrigation field. Discharge from any water softener, spas or pool should not be directed to the OWS. EXPERIMENTAL DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM - The proposed drip irrigation OWS has been authorized as an experimental OWS. As a part of the authori- zation, there will be conditions of the permit which are not typical of a permit in Pitkin County. The conditions include: 1. the applicant must commit to follow recommendations of the department and the design engineer, 2. a backup system design is required, 3. monitoring of soil saturation will be required and must be reported for 5 years, 4. an annual report of the soil moisture will be required for 5 years, 5. a screened basket or filter will be required, 6. the site must be re- viewed for solar exposure and exposure to wind, 7. the Department will allow design without a 1.5 peaking factor, and 8. you or your install - met 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 832.8682 FAX (303) 832.3817 N.U. box "wub9 p • tvargraen, l [Q muc (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 • 2 • er will be required to post a bond for the installation of the system, with release of the bond with approval of the installation by the De- partment, the design engineer, and the provision of an as -built draw- ing. The primary condition which will affect you is having a bond posted for installation. If respect to the remaining conditions: 1. you must agree to the terms of the permit, 2. a backup design is the previous ET design, 3. monitoring as described later in this letter will be required which will include an annual report as described in Item 4, 5. a filter is a part of this design, 6. the site has been reviewed as described under Site Conditions and found suitable for installation of a drip irrigation OWS, 7. the Department will allow the construction of the OWS without a 1.5 peaking factor, and 8. re- quires the bonding of the installation cost. Another drip irrigation system has been installed in Pitkin County so we do not expect any problems with installation or performance of the OWS. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - Subsurface conditions were investigated by Nelson at the locations indicated on Fig. 1. Subsurface conditions consisted of 2.25 feet of dark gray silty topsoil underlain by 1 foot of dark brown silty clay, underlain to 8 feet by stiff brownish -tan clay. No free water was encountered nor was observed 1 day after exca- vation in the profile pit. Percolation rates ranged from 27 to 32 minutes per inch (MPI) in the northern portions of the site, to 240 to 480 MPI in the southern portions of the field area. A copy of the Nelson data is attached. RECOMMENDATIONS - The poor percolation of the soil in the southern portion of the proposed field dictate an evapotranspiration -absorption (ETA) type OWS will be required. The system is proposed to the north of residence as indicated on Fig. 2, with a two septic tank/lift sta- tion and drip irrigation field system. We recommend the installation of two 1000 gallon two compartment precast concrete septic tanks with an Orenco Screened Basket lift station, as indicated on Fig. 4. The field area is based on 525 GPD for a 2 bedroom home, 32 inches of lake evaporation per year based on the US Department of Commerce Wea- ther Bureau Technical Paper No. 37, and attached water balance design. The area of field required is 4000 SF. We recommend the field be in- stalled in four 100 foot long drip irrigation sections which includes 4 or 6 lines in 2 to 3 backhoe trenches as indicated on Fig. 3. The proposed field is larger than the minimum requirement to provide a factor of safety and possibly allow greater loading in the future. If the owner is anticipating finishing of additional bedrooms in un- finished areas or additions, we recommend the OWS be constructed to handle the additional loading. The installation of a properly sized OWS to serve future buildout can be cost effective. The proposed sep- tic tank configuration will serve up to a 2 bedroom residence of less than 2000 SF. For greater than 2 bedrooms or 3 bedrooms with greater than 2000 SF, the septic tank must be upsized to 250 gallons per bed- room. Each additional bedroom larger than 2 bedrooms would require an additional 2000 SF of drip irrigation field. We recommend the surface of the E -T field be seeded after installation of the system. A good native grass cover will promote E -T. We recom- mend a local seed mix available at local seed stores. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed over the field. LW41 0 3 0 The owner must realize an OWS is different from public sewer service. The owner must assume the responsibility for maintenance of the sys- tem. The system is relatively maintenance free, but the owner must have the septic tanks pumped. We recommend the tank be pumped every 2 years. There are daily considerations, such as not putting plastic or other nonbiodegradable material into the system. Water use must be monitored so toilets are not allowed to run when seals malfunction. To illustrate the point, a running toilet will consume in excess of 1000 gallons per day if allowed to run. An excess 1000 GPD loading could flood and irreparably harm the field and stress the well. As a part of the Permit, there will be conditions imposed by the Pit- kin County Health Department. One condition which will be different from normal installations will be the requirement for bonding of the installation of the drip irrigation system. This is required because of prior poor experiences in Pitkin County with experimental systems. A drip irrigation system was installed in Pitkin County and there have not problems with the installation. Seven of the eight conditions will have been met with completion of the installation and only an annual reporting of soil moisture conditions and performance of the system will be required. We anticipate the annual reporting require- ment for 5 years and is estimated to cost $125.00. If the drip irri- gation OWS performs as the existing system has, we would apply to have the monitoring period reduced to 3 years. We caution against installation of a water softener. The hvdraulic loading from the backwash of a water softener can be detrimental to OWS and a separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash waste, if a water softener is installed. No landscaping or plastic can be used over the field, which will reduce evapotranspiration from the field. Chemically treated water from a swimming pool or spas should not be introduced into the OWS. LIMITATIONS - An drip irrigation design requires installation by a contractor who is an experienced installer. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted. If subsurface conditions considerably different from those described in this report are encountered, we should evaluate the effect of the changes on the proposed OWS. If modifications to this design are made by governing Health Departments, we should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the performance of our OWS design. If there are any gge�'IbhS '.please call. E. O. CHURCH, INC, f. OEdward 0. Church, P.E. s'2�-t EOC 3 copies sent xc: Mike Morgan, 3651 Austin Road, Brawley, CA 89227 xc: Nelson Environmental and Wastewater, Ltd. G� • PARCEL &42 SCALE SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH 1 = 40 PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO o P-5 t 0P-4 P¢ppOSEO I FIELOO 0 P-3 1 � o P-1 PROFILE PIT \ I PROPOSED ,---�-2 BEDROOM IRESIDENCE � t � t EXISTING GRAVEL WATER WELL PARKING AREA < . 2000 GALLON N WATER STORAGE TANK JOB NO. 6720 !� SITE PLAN AND LOCATION OF PROFILE PIT AND PERCOLATION HOLES FIG. I PARCEL &42 0 SCALE SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH 1 = 40 PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO Ill IN 0 SF OF DRIP IRRIGATION FIELD 1111 I NNAL LOC IN A MINIMUM OF 4 SECTIONS. I FINAL LOCATIONS OF DRIP LINES TO BE DETE MINED AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. Jill Jill,MINI PROPOSED 1000 GALLON \ I TWO COMPARTMENT PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK LIFT STATICN WITH SCREENED "�4 INCH PVC SEWER LINE PUMP VAUL- T PROPOSED 2 BEDROOM RESIDENCE EXISTING - LL WELL GRAVEL PARKING AREA EXISTING \ 2000 GALLON WATER STORAGE TANK 0O Q�oQ��PJ OF EXTEND DRAIN TO BELOW WELL LOCATION OF PROPOSED OSDS JOB N0. 6'20 bi FIG. 2 1000 GALLON TWO COMPAIWNT N0./ TION WIDTH LINES SEPTIC TANK WITH SCREEN 2 A 12 6 BASKET PUMP 2 B 8 4 DISTRIBUTION 0 0 0 0 INFLUENT LINE VALVES OR SURGE TANK 1000 GALLON 2 COMPARTMENT SEPTIC TANK 2 INCH CLASS 200 PVC PIPE WITH HOLES ON 8 INCH CENTERS 1/4 INCH HEADERS NO FOOT ON CENTER SPACING MANIFOLDS r i0o, A. TYPICAL FIELD PLAN fFz4'-->f hE24`3�l B. TYPICAL FIELD CROSS-SECTION TREATMENT UNIT I. TWO 1000 GALLON 2 COMPARTMENT SEPTIC TANKS WITH PUMP IN 2ND CHAMBER OF 2ND TANK. 2. PUMP 173 HP GOULD 3. ALARM/CONTROL LOCATION AT OWNER'S REOUEST 4. RISERS (4l TO SURyCE _ S. DRAIN BACK—TO PUMP 6. CHAMBER OR FIELD 7. OTHER C. SPECIFICATIONS JOB NO. 6720 U Z, VENT n GROUND SURFACE DISTRIBUTION FIELD 1. BEDROOMS 2 LOAD (0 GAL.I 300 2, PERCOLATION RATE (MPI) �n0 3. AREA - 4000 SF. SEE WATER BALANCE 4. FIELD AREA (SO.FT.) 4000 S. FIELD LINE (LN. FT.) 2000 6, TRENCH SIZE 24 INCHES. 7, LANDSCAPING BY OWNER. 8. OTHER DRP IRRIGATION DESIGN SHEET RG. 3 1000 GALLON TWO COMMENT PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC OK OR SEPERATE 500 GALLON CHAMBER. (TANK WITH 18' OPENING) 6' DIAMETER PVC WITH ACCESS LID POWER LINE FROM DEDICATED CIRCUI INLET FROM FIRST SEPTIC TANK CAST -IN-PLACE BAFFLES SPECIFICATIONS: ACCESS LID PUMP LINE TO DISTRIBUTION VALVES --� UNION JOINT FOR QUICK DISCONNECT HIGH WATER ALARM ON/OFF FLOAT EFFLUANT PUMP SCREENED PUMP VAULT I. PUMP: 0.40HP 11/2 -INCH DISCHARGE 36GPM/15 HEAD; GOULD. TECUMSEH. GRUNDFOS. ZOELLER OR EQUIVALENT 2. PUMP ON LEVEL WITH A MINIMUM OF 150 GALLONS FOR PUMPING 3. INSTALL PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE AT HIGH POINT IN PUMP LINE. 4. AUDIBLE ALARM AT BUILDING. ALARM LEVEL 3 INCHES ABOVE 'ON' FLOAT LEVEL OF TANK. PUMP CHAMBER DETAIL JOB NO. 6720 Co3 rm =pY J m n w n uOm m b f r m $n m 0 0 N C6 J¢ 00 [0 rww m_ n m m b Fi n Y m m C 0 z 5 Q0 J Cw C7 O O N 0 O Y O b O Y 0- ;5 IQ- a WO LL 1A m b ul w N n b N w 10 f'00 O O O O O O p O O O O wa O O O m pb m b O N O O O O b LL O O O 8 O O O O O n O O O a O O O O O O O O O O �a w 7 N n O O O O O O O O O O O O _ l w� ❑ n w O m w m m (O b m b 'W`I. 000 8 8: 0 m w m 0 0 0 rn W. Jz- ¢d! <o �i o< mei � (a7 8 n m O b P m b N m by Q O d O OI n Ow NN � O 10 w 'P P t0 QP w(Aw n b b n O n N O b w m < ¢Z a0 OJ HJ W wa LL 2 0 W m N N N m f N N N m m J ¢ b w i LL W x Q wO a � z? � N b N m b t9 O O m O m O lel � n n n Y t0 Vf n m O n O N N O n n O m w n 1D b b N m = LL f w < z x ¢ zO Z ¢ z zZ m ^ M O m6 b O b N 4 O N ZDZ O b Y m N V N m m N N Ilf bf 000 F b2b F Smw ab 02Z 0w ma wO �Ow ¢ w wOb az p g WO' ❑R Zzom $'w �' m' 8 8 m $ 8 8 $ 'lno' 30�< 0< Omwm J N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 O 00 w W W m 0 ¢ O w HapHap ms 8 s 8 8 8 IR 8 2 1 8 8m W (O N b w b YI 10 1(I (O b b Q6b¢ mC Y O Y Y O C < Y Y < f w a wo a O' ¢ ¢ ¢ > ¢ w w ¢ < 1�Y <mw °ozw<aa<z>oa� 3 R O O z '0 1 LL Z w < N 0 N N 2 Q z O N H0 O Z w l-�0 LLWWO W LL w ¢¢ J J 0 «x¢ Zo D w J W LL z w ❑ W ¢ LL m E Q U ❑ z O w Y Y w ZZZ F f r DZ Z www aaa OOW OOz w WZZW W J J D 03 ¢g8 aww ZZ r00 0 0 LP 13 M,Je-e- AOR -6-111v 9; „ •� ED@ , 11, Site of system must be similar to that required for an ET system - not in a shaded north -facing valley, but in an area open to sunshine and breezes enough days per year and hours per day. DETAILS NEEDED IN THE PERMIT Permit must be issued in the name(s) of the legal owners of the property involved and must contain % an accurate description of the property Permit must display the requirements in Section 4- 20 of regs, "Experimental Systems". The permit issued for a Drip Irrigation system shall be recorded in real estate records for the property. Every 5 years in January of each year, the applicant (owner) must provide a written report to EH Dept documenting maintenance, soil moisture Odata if requ &(�red. © �l I l� 1lz��y1 ITEMS NEEDED BEFORE ISSUING THE PERMIT al�1y� July 17, 1996 letter signed by owner stating that owner understands the conditions of Resolution #96-134. V/ Bond from Omer• += . Approved Soil Moisture Monitoring Plan from Engineer (i.e., Ed Church), if a "water balance" method of calculating waste load is applied. There must be room for a backup system in case A/ this experimental system fails. A filter after the final septic tank is required. Site of system must be similar to that required for an ET system - not in a shaded north -facing valley, but in an area open to sunshine and breezes enough days per year and hours per day. DETAILS NEEDED IN THE PERMIT Permit must be issued in the name(s) of the legal owners of the property involved and must contain % an accurate description of the property Permit must display the requirements in Section 4- 20 of regs, "Experimental Systems". The permit issued for a Drip Irrigation system shall be recorded in real estate records for the property. Every 5 years in January of each year, the applicant (owner) must provide a written report to EH Dept documenting maintenance, soil moisture Odata if requ &(�red. © �l I l� 1lz��y1 EOC • • qtr' E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS August 5, 1996 ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ATTN: Nancy MacKenzie and Tom Dunlop 130 Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Subject: Soil Moisture Monitorina Drip Irrigation OWS Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Dunlop, We are submitting the Yollowing soil moisture monitoring program for the proposed drip irrigation OWS in Pitkin County for the experimental drip irrigation systems. Base line soils data would be obtained at oWS construction. The test- ing would include moisture and density of the native soil. A minimum of 5 soil moisture samples would be obtained and tested dur- ing May of each year. One sample must be from a drip irrigation sec- tion which is open and one may be from the section which is closed The three remaining samples would be randomly obtained from trench areas based on a random number generator system. The samples would be obtained from a depth of 12 to 3o inches using a JMC BACKSAVER SOIL SAMPLER or AMS SOIL RECOVERY PROBE. Based on the soil moisture test- ing a report indicating: 1. location of tests, 2. moisture/density and 3, percent saturation will be reported. If the percent saturation exceeds 90% in two of the three samples and there is no evidence of surfacing, additional samples will be obtained in August. Any evi- dence of surfacing would first require closing of that section of the field and monitoring. If there are any questions, please call. E. O. CHURCH, INC. Edward O. Church, P.E. 2 copies sent 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver. Colorado 80218-1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen Colorado 80437-i -� 1 (3p3) 832.95g2 FAX (303) 832-517 (303)67446W FAX(303)674-0813 TOTAL P.03 gep - 1:3 -- 96 1O:21A V scc • P.O1 P 1N"— 2 ` Goo VZ;4. r�y� Bond No 197022P Performance Bond "Printed in cooperation with the American Institute of Architects (AIA) by the Insco/Dico Group. The language in this document conforms exactly to the language used in AIA Document A311, February, 1970 edition." KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: that Michael Morgan Deirdre Morgan as Principal, hereinafter called Contractor, and, Developers Surety and Indemnity Company as Surety, hereinafter called Surety, are held and firmly bound unto Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado as Obligee, hereinafter called Owner, in the amount of (Here insert full risme and address or legal cine or Contractor) (Here insert full name and address or legal title of Surety) (Here insert full name and address or legal tale of Owner) Fifteen Thousand and 00/100----------------------------- Dollars ($"*15,000.), for the payment whereof Contractor and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, finely by these presents. WHEREAS, Contractor has by written agreement dated May 22 1996, entered into a contract with Owner for (Here insert full name. address and descnption of pro)ect) Michael Morgan 4275 Sopris Mountain Road Install Drip Irrigation Deirdre Morgan Basalt, CO 81621 Sewage Disposal System in accordance with Drawings and Specifications prepared by In Accordance to Resolution 19-134 Ofera Insert fun name and address or letal title of Architect) Which contract is by reference made a part hereof, and is hereinafter referred to as the Contract. L j j K) W2 Ala - NAYC Pwlanuriaa O(Ml Sep -13-96 10:21A • • PERFORMANCE BOND NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that, if Contractor shall promptly and faithfully perform said Contract, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. The Surety hereby waives notice of any alteration or extension of time made by the Owner. Whenever Contractor shall be, and declared by Owner to be in default under the Contract, the Owner having performed Owner's obligations thereunder, the Surety may promptly remedy the default, or shall promptly t) Complete the Contract in accordance with its terms and conditions, or 2) Obtain a bid or bids for completing the Contract in accordance with its terns and conditions, and upon de- termination bySufety of the lowest responsible bidder, or, if the Owner elects, upon determination by the Owner and the Surety jointly of the lowest responsible bidder, arrange for a contract between such bidder and Owner, and make available as Work progresses (even though there should be a default or a succession of defaults under the contract or contracts of completion arranged under this paragraph) Signed and sealed this P-02 sufficient funds to pay the cost of completion less the balance of the contract price; but not exceeding, including other costs and damages for which the Surety may be liable hereunder, the amount set forth In the first paragraph hereof. The term "balance of the contract price," as used in this paragraph, shall mean the total amount payable by Owner to Contractor under the Contract and any amend- ments thereto, less the amount properly paid by Owner to Contractor. Any suit under this bond must be instituted before the expiration of two (2) years from the date on which final payment under the Contract falls due. No right of action shall accrue on this bond to or for the use of any person or corporation other than the Owner named herein or the heirs, executors, administrators or successors of the Owner. day of 19 ^11\ (Principal) (Seal) flNilne' ' _/ (Witness) STATE OF 1 COUNTY OF �HDEL/AL J SS. On SEO-e,eA 1: /(.//9/fG C/F!gbefore me, %erN aeg Z&OC,/� il�orq e M PERSONALLY APPEARED /![_. /7QCl.A�/ A�/4 /S!/.¢OLF- /"14,el— ✓ personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowl- edged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/ her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/ their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signa�u r OPTIONAL +. v This arm for Oficial Notarial Seal Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER ME(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: N E OF PERSON(S) OR EW"OES) Et ID -081 Re, 6194 ALL-PURPOSE DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT �fLPOLH4r1/LE ,Bo�� TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT -? DSI S NUMBER dF AGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 1ol'5`gG 0 g-, 0 nI , d �cOlt- .x,�. t1 -Q _�+r�� 2 tea- .��_u�-�- .����.�•� ��,.,�,�� valuc. box "+_eoaiXl11ln �— h _np+ lur ^ ►�s� � 1, P _�;ic dosc iAa14 IUi�r �n �c1�s� Cc�S,7 � D;as � B•K. 'I 'z— i A • • A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO APPROVING THE CONCEPT OF DRIP IRRIGATION AS AN EXPERIMENTAL ALTERNATIVE TO WASTEWATER DISPOSAL Resolution # 96 - G 990 RECITALS 1. The Pitkin County Board of Commissioners has declared in the Pitkin Countv Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulation (Regulation), support for alternative methods of wastewater disposal not otherwise provided for in the Regulation. In this case such an alternative system commonly known as Drip Irrigation shall be declared "experimental". 2. The Pitkin County Board of Commissioners has declared in the Regulation that the experimental system must be designed by a Registered Professional Engineer prior to submittal to the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department for review. 3. The Pitkin County Board of Commissioners, acting as the Pitkin County Board of Health (PCBOH) recognizes, and the Regulation states: "The Local Board of Health may not arbitrarily deny any person the right to consideration of an application for such a system and shall apply reasonable performance standards in determining whether to approve an application." NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, that the use of "Drip Irrigation" as an experimental wastewater disposal system in Pitkin County meets the conditions of the Regulation to be declared experimental, and sitting as the Pitkin County Board of Health declare approval for installation of a total of eight (8) such systems in the County with the following conditions: 1. Any permit for installation of a Drip Irrigation wastewater disposal system must be issued in the name(s) of the legal owners of the property involved, must contain an accurate description of the property, and must conspicuously display the requirements in Section 4-20 of the Regulation, titled; "Experimental Systems". 4qQ • 2 • 2. The Pitkin County Board of Health and the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department will assume no liability in the act of issuing a permit for a Drip Irrigation wastewater disposal system, either for design or performance. 3. The permit issued for a Drip Irrigation wastewater disposal system shall be recorded in real estate records for the property served by the system. This recording is for the purpose of putting future purchasers on notice that an experimental sewage disposal system serves their property. 4. The applicant must commit to follow the recommendations of the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department (Department), and those of the Registered Professional Engineer consultant to the Department if approval is given to install the experimental system. 5. As is stated in the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation, Section 4-20; The applicant must provide for a "... timely installation of a backup system of a type described in this regulation if the experimental system fails." The lot on which a Drip Irrigation system is to be installed must be large enough to accommodate a traditional Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) so that if the Drip Irrigation system fails and cannot be repaired, the owner will have room to construct a replacement system. This is consistent with previous PCBOH actions on experimental systems as found in Section 12-8.1 of the ISDS Regulation. 6. If a 'water balance" method of calculating waste load is applied, the applicant must provide a monitoring plan to determine the saturation status of soils. especially in the early spring months when the leaching bed is at its peak storage. 7. The applicant must provide a written report to the Environmental Health Department documenting maintenance on the system (such as when the filters are changed and when the valve regulating field use is activated). The soil saturation data requested in condition 6 above must also be reported. The reporting must continue for a period of five (5) years, and be submitted to the Environmental Health Department in January of each year. 8. The installation of a filter after the final septic tank to remove any material which may remain to clog the distribution line ports will be required. 9. Since Drip Irrigation is promoted as an ISDS that is suitable for poor percolating soils, it assumes the form of a modified evapotranspiration (ET) system. In some cases it may be an evaotranspiration/absorption system using both air and plant evaporation with minimal soil absorption. Section 12-6.4 of the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation requires placement of these type systems, ".An an area where there is exposure to sunshine enough days per year and hours per day to allow for adequate functioning of the system, and must take into account the number of months per year in which the area is covered with snow. ET systems may not be used in shaded north -facing areas in valleys, for example, but must be in areas that are open to sunshine and exposed to sufficient breezes." • 3 • 10. Pitkin County ISDS Regulation requires a water flow "peaking factor" in the design of ISDS. However, since no "daily peaking factor" is figured in the calculation of the Drip Irrigation wastewater disposal system, and this is a significant variation from the Regulation, this requirement is waived with the condition that only a total of eight (8) systems using this modification be allowed in Pitkin County until it can be verified that the public health of residents, and the environmental health of surface and ground water is not compromised. 11. The owner will be required to post a bond to assure the system is installed and has a final inspection performed by the design engineer, and that a final "as - built" drawing is provided to the Environmental Health Department. The bond must be sufficient to cover costs of the final inspection, creating an "as -built" drawing, and submitting final documentation to the Environmental Health Department. APPROVED AND .ADOPTED ON THE' _ DAY OF (1 � . 1996. PUBLISHED AFTER ADOPTION IN THE ASPEN TIMES ON THE�fAAY OF_ 1996 rrrr ATTEST: Je' ette Jones Deputy Clerk & Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: County Attorney MANAGER APPROV Manager BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO antes R. True Chairman RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: /Z9,a G /L Thomas S. Dunlop, Director Environmental Health Department C *PARCEL &42 • SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO SCALE 1"=40' F�--�`� 0 P -S 0 P-4 �appsEa I 0 F1E1 d' P-3 o P_2-- I o P-1 PROFILE PIT \ I OSED DROOM DENCE t t i JOB NO. 6720 SITE PLAN AND LOCATION OF PROFILE PIT AND PERCOLATION HOLES FIG. I AW • POID le ASPEN/PTTWN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPLICATIPN FOF3,AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (ISOS) PERMIT . Name of OWNER r Mailing Address Bus. Phone #Y6� Phone # Name of AGENT Bus. Phone # 2S z Z f � Mailing Address Z s1 r Home Phone # � q� 01 oil ( ) Copy of Permit to b Sent to: oERMIT IS FOR: EW INSTALLATION, O REPAIR, O ALTERATION NOT DUE TO FAILURE, or O PKRGENCY USE. for permit # _ STREET ADDRESS of Property: V1 V EGAL DESCRIPTION of Property: f e UvL lot oc filing _, and subdiv_!S��� 46 a QLa„ Size of LotJ i� acres Type of Structure Proposed YL # BEDROOMS 2, # LOFTS # GARBAGE DISPOSALS # DISHWASHERS I # LOTHES W HERS P Nater Supply: ) rivate Wall, ) Spring, ( ) Stream, or I ) System (Public or Private Namo: 1 IS PROOF OF ADEQUATE WATER ATTACHED? Y— or () NO HAS pi15 PR9IECT BEEN APPROVED BY PRKIN COUNTY? () YES r () NO ww(dd/t ea \ Applkation lo, an IndMdual sewage disposal system permit k hereby submiacd The undersigned ac ges that the above information k We and that false Information will Invalidate he apphcatlon and any subsequent permit, Issuance of the permit does not espiiciey or Implicitly imply the apporal or any oh Penna required for ction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may be undertaken until all approvals and cerin¢ have been obtained. The oXmar assumes eji24ps !Jties In case of fatax, or bade uvscy blind.system. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT The application becomes invalid 120 tf ff •lfff lff ff Rfff ftf•t INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE '�`' i 5150 fee paid `y Yes. Date received ii / .5 DESIGN CRR-RfA OF SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED: krw nchal # of Bedrooms: �, Percolator PercolRate: _ mp_1� Itoi, 1AV4 Date Is Perml is valid the design as specified baro_ . 3 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY..... *••'•••"•'•••••'•••••••• )ISP AL SYSTEM PERMIT # 5 O S 3 Receipt \ 2. Z Received By �j y l�1-� es must be bmitted and approved in writing. ,( .2 too .501 yj/ ow: gallons. 0 v Is an En neer Designed s stem needed? Yes or No 1 9 9 y () W dans and speGficatrolls of tlIe ertginem shwa be koowad. Arty nJwt{ps must be aPPre+•d In writing and shwa sanity the anal Installation to ha Environmental "IDepartment In wrWrp.) - _ -- Minimum Septic Tank Capacity 1. D60 gallons Absorption Area i.4Jy square feet minimum t T ' ) Absorption Bed, ( ) Absorption Field in Trenches, () Gravel -less system, ( ) mping/Dosing Chamber, ( ) Absorption It P,11- .Aj�� 0t'X-r I F, o, 11,1141 Kf ll f lAI L etIZ4-41 y-25- 95 Stages requiring inspection: ( ) Before excavation, ( ) Upon completion and prior to placement of gravel,Before covering distribution system of absorption `field, (Prior to backfill of any component and any situation deemed necessary by Environmental Healt Department Staff. 'Ws and specifications of the proposed Individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or his agent in perform the work Wceted above in accordance with the Pitkin County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations In eaeQ on the date of issue. In addition to general provisions set forth in any attachments, this Permit is subiccl ,� he foaowing additional terns and conditions it any: APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY: )IL&C� Dn\TE OF ISSUE: r/-202 `J - 9 S rlq above individual sewage disposal system has been Inspected use by he AspenlPitkin Envi on ntal Health DepadmarL The owner assumes all res nsibifties in case of tenure or madeevacy of this systems Complete as built drawing and oil specificalions of asbu me included with this permit FINAL INSPECTION BY: :eOTH.l1DO:JTCPC: W P:PERMn. e. t ATp10 198 G DATE OF FINAL INSPECTION: 130 SCIUM-1 GALENA STREET . ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 . PHONE 30].920.50]0 - FAx ]03.920.519] PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER ASPEN&`KIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH C FINAL SYSTEM DESIGN FINAL SPECIFICS OF THE SYSTEM INCLUDED UNDER THIS PERMfi: (As -Built Conditions) Type of Tank or Treatment Unit: Tank Capacity: gallons Type of Absorption Field: Absorption Area: square feet DESCRIPTION, CONDITIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS OF SYSTEM DESIGN: M FINAL AS -BUILT PLOT RAR: FINAL INSPECTION BY: DATE OF INSPECTION: �MUDD✓TCPC:WRPERMILd1 130 SOIRN GALENA STREET ' ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 COED 920.5010 - FM ]0].920.5101 44 I City of Aspen/Pitkin County - Fire Place Per'71 Function [PRINT Tax Sched: 0- 6996 Owner Name: MORGAN, MICHAEL Address MORGAN, DEIRDRE WHITCOMB Date: 18 -SEP -95 Address 2 3651 AUSTIN ROAD City State: BRAWLEY, CA Zip: 89227 Even Address: E Parcel Id: 246534401015 Legal: SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH Applicant Name: Street Nun: 0 Street Name: Structure Type: SF Description: PARCEL 24 Coaments: VERMONT CASTINGS -DEFIANT How Many Fire Places: 0 How Many Gas Log Fireplaces: 0 How Many Inserts: 0 Insert Info: Catalyst: How Many Wood Stoves: 1 Wood Stove Info: Catalyst: How Many Coal Devices: 0 Gas Appliances: 0 Other Devices: 0 Type of Other Devices: Certified Stove: Abort Help Refrsh 09-25-1995 09:34AM 0. CHURCH-MERRITT HOUSE TO E.O. CHURCH, INC., ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS September 13, 1995 M Mike Morgan c/o Tony Rutgers 512 Spruce Street Aspen,!CO 81611 Subject: Onsite Sewage Dihposal System Design Parcel 42,1 Soprits Mountain Ranch, Pitkin County, Cplorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Morgan, 19709205197 P.02 I As requested, we have reviewed subsurface conditions and percolation tests performed at t�e subject site by Nelson Environmental and Waste- water Solutions, Ltd., (Nelson) dated September 7, 1995. The purpose of ourireview was to evaluate subsurfaceconditions and to design an Onsite Sewage Disposal System (OSDS). SITE CONDITIONS - The site is an approximate 1.48 acre parcel i a rural Area of Pitkin: County, Colorado. The location of the propo ed reside ce, profile pit and percolation tests are presented on Fig. 1. The slope at the proposed field area is 16% to the east. The ground surface has a moderate cover of grass and native vegetation. PROPOSAD CONSTRUCTION - A 2 bedroom cabin residence is proposed tolbe moved to the house location as indicated on Figs. 1 and 2. The cabin has less then 2000 square feet (SF). The sewage loading for a 2 bed- room dwelling is 300 gallons per day (GPD), 525 GPD with a 1.75 factor to determine the design load. The design loading includes a garb�ge grinder, dish washer and washing machine. The site will be served water by an onsite well located at the southwest corner of the proper- ty, whiICh is 120 feet from the proposed E -T field. Discharge from any water softener, spaslor pool should not be directed to the OSDS. I i SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - Subsurface conditions were investigated by Nelson at the locations indicated on Fig. 1. Subsurface conditions consisted of 2,25 feet Of dark gray silty topsoil underlain by 1 f t of dark brown silty clay, underlain to 8 feet by stiff brownish -tan No free water was encountered nor was observed 1 day of ter excavation in the profile p,it. Percolation rates ranged from 27 to 32 minutes per inch (MPI) in t#e northern portions of the site, to 240��tt0 480 MP� in the southern portions of the field area. A copy of tie Nelson ,data is attached. RECOMMEINDATIONS - The poor percolation of the soil in the southe�'n portion of the proposed fi�ld dictate a E -T type OSDS will be requff- ed. The system is proposed to the north of residence as indicated Ion Fig. 2, with a septic tank and E -T and absorption field. We recommend the installation of a 1000 gallon two compartment precast concrel e 925 Eaal 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218 P.O. Boz 2869 • Evergreen, Co#ado 1 (303) 832.9892 FAX (303) $32-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (903) 674.0813 TOTAL P.02 09-22-1995 09:53RM septic tank. Becaus lift station will be Gated on Fig..2 and The design of the fi home, the conversion year based on the U: Paper o. 37, as ati SF. We recommended t for an area of 9600 serial distribution field are presented form t�e edges of t] f.0. CHURCH_MERRITT HOUSE TO 19709205039 P.01 2 of the required area of the field, we believe a required for to access the west field, as indi- ald is;based on using the 525 GPD for a 2 bedroom factor 586, and 32 inches of lake evaporation per Department of commerce Weather Bureau Technical ached.! The total area of field required is 9614 to fiend be installed in two 100 by 48 foot fields F. Oilscharge would be to the western field, with to the east field. IDetails of the proposed E -T in Fig'. 2 and 3. onsite materials can be used to e bed !areas. I Dispersal gravel anE- requirements should be Rubbertiredequipm nt be used. Graveless unit gravel in the bed. T sand meeting Pitkin County Health Department placed with a tragk mounted loader or backhoe. which will compact or seal the sand should not s such as "Infiltrator" may be substituted for I I I This d�sign is bein submitted to obtain'a septic permit. We believe there fire more appr priateldesigns whichJflcould include a design based on: 1� a "water baance" for an E -T fie d, or 2. a "drip irrigation" OSDS system. We u derstand you would eke us to proceed with the alternatives, but needle to obtain datia for a design with a water balance and approve' for a drip�-irrigation system. Anticipated field areas ill be small r bas on some infiltration of effluent. With a smaller area requir ment,the fields will not have to be cut as deeply into ttttttQl�� a stone. If the owner is antic ipating finishing of additional bedrooms in un- finished areas or additions, we recommend the OSDS be constructed to handle the additional loading. The installation of a properly sized OSDS tp serve future buildout can be cost effective. The proposed sep- tic tank cgnfiquratLon will serve up to a 3 bedroom residence of less than 000 SF- For greater than 3 bedrooms or 3 bedrooms with greater than 2000 SF, the septic tank must be upsized to 250 gallons per bed- room. Each additio al bed oom larger than 2 bedrooms would require an additional 4807 SF of E-Titype field based on current design data. We recommend the system. su�face ove grass cover w the E -T field be seeded after installation ey A g Od native promote E -T. we recom- of thmend a seed mix su: as '*foothills, Pasture, or Prairie" mixes avail- able ajt local seed stores) These mixes do not require irrigation and develoop a growth 101 to 15linches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed over the field. The 0TT,lnner must realize aniOSDS is different from public sewer service. The owner must assume the responsibility for maintenance of the Sys- tem. The system is relatively maintenance free, but the owner must have the septic tanks pumped. We recommend the tank be pumped every 2 years. There areldaily;considerations, such as not putting plastic or ofY}er nonbiodegradablematerial into the sewage system. Waterluse must lye monitored so toilets are not allowed to run when seals �al- function. To illustrate the point, a running toilet will consume, in excess of 1000 gallons per day if allowed to run. An excess 1000 GPD loading could flood and it,keparably harm the field and stress thew 11. I' 09-22-1995 09:54AM FROM0 0. CHURCH_MERRITT HOUSE TO 19709205039 P.02 3 t I We cauiion against installation of a water softener. The hydraulic loading from the backwashjof a water softener can be detrimentallto OSDS and a separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash waste,lif a water softener is installed. No landscaping or plasi.ic can beiused over the! field 'which will reduce evapotranspiration from the field. Chemicaly treated water from a swimming pool or spas should not be introduced into the OSDS. LIMITATIONS - A E-Tidesign;requires installation by a contractor who is experienced in its installation. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data sub�itted. if subsurface condi- tions considerably different from those described in this report are encountered, we should evaluate the effect of the changes on the pro- posed 6SDS. If modlificat ons to this design are made by governing HealthlDepartments,lwe should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the pe*formance of our OSpS design. If there are any qu stions.., please call.. i I i E. 0. EHURCH, INC, l 10() REG C).' 9•;0 Edward 0. Churc <o. E. :w 13172 f EOC �0 • 3 copies sent S/ONA- I A- c: Mike Morgan, 3 81 Austin Road, Braejiley, CA 89227 i cc: Nelson Environ*entaland Wastewater, Ltd. TOTAL P.02 4(1�, 1 vav�-c v� Cod 14d8S:Z 5661 ZZ'd�S wl� yypI� qq tip❑� i ,e4 ' r m' u �b"Jill 8. en IDA a LLZ9 £Z6 : 'ON 3NOFId 1SIQ NolidLINUSSda1FN9 SSUMON5 wc.aj j EDC E.O. CHURCH, INC. • ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS September 13, 1995 Mike Morgan c/o Tony Rutgers 512 Spruce Street Aspen, CO 81611 Subject: Onsite Sewage Disposal System Design Parcel 42, Sopris Mountain Ranch, Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Morgan, As requested, we have reviewed subsurface conditions and percolation tests performed at the subject site by Nelson Environmental and Waste- water Solutions, Ltd., (Nelson) dated September 7, 1995. The purpose of our review was to evaluate subsurface conditions and to design an Onsite Sewage Disposal System (OSDS). SITE CONDITIONS - The site is an approximate 1.48 acre parcel in a rural area of Pitkin County, Colorado. The location of the proposed residence, profile pit and percolation tests are presented on Fig. 1. The slope at the proposed field area is 16% to the east. The ground surface has a moderate cover of grass and native vegetation. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - A 2 bedroom cabin residence is proposed to be moved to the house location as indicated on Figs. 1 and 2. The cabin has less then 2000 square feet (SF). The sewage loading for a 2 bed- room dwelling is 300 gallons per day (GPD), 525 GPD with a 1.75 factor to determine the design load. The design loading includes a garbage grinder, dish washer and washing machine. The site will be served water by an onsite well located at the southwest corner of the proper- ty, which is 120 feet from the proposed E -T field. Discharge from any water softener, spas or pool should not be directed to the OSDS. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - Subsurface conditions were investigated by Nelson at the locations indicated on Fig. 1. Subsurface conditions consisted of 2.25 feet of dark gray silty topsoil underlain by 1 foot of dark brown silty clay, underlain to 8 feet by stiff brownish -tan clay. No free water was encountered nor was observed 1 day after excavation in the profile pit. Percolation rates ranged from 27 to 32 minutes per inch (MPI) in the northern portions of the site, to 240 to 480 MPI in the southern portions of the field area. A copy of the Nelson data is attached. RECOMMENDATIONS - The poor percolation of the soil in the southern portion of the proposed field dictate a E -T type OSDS will be requir- ed. The system is proposed to the north of residence as indicated on Fig. 2, with a septic tank and E -T and absorption field. We recommend G the installation of a 1000 gallon two compartment precast concrete 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80439 (303) 632-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 2 septic tank. Because of the required area of the field, we believe a lift station will be required for to access the west field, as indi- cated on Fig. 2 and 4. The design of the field is based on using the 525 GPD for a 2 bedroom home, the conversion factor 586, and 32 inches of lake evaporation per year based on the US Department of Commerce Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 37, as attached. The total area of field required is 9614 SF. We recommended the field be installed in two 100 by 48 foot fields for an area of 9600 SF. Discharge would be to the western field, with serial distribution to the east field. Details of the proposed E -T field are presented on Fig. 2 and 3. Onsite materials can be used to form the edges of the bed areas. Dispersal gravel and E -T sand meeting Pitkin County Health Department requirements should be placed with a track mounted loader or backhoe. Rubber tired equipment which will compact or seal the sand should not be used. Graveless units such as "Infiltrator" may be substituted for gravel in the bed. This design is being submitted to obtain a septic permit. We believe there are more appropriate designs which could include a design based on: 1. a "water balance" for an E -T field, or 2. a "drip irrigation" OSDS system. We understand you would like us to proceed with the alternatives, but we need to obtain data for a design with a water balance and approval for a drip -irrigation system. Anticipated field areas will be smaller based on some infiltration of effluent. With a smaller area requirement, the fields will not have to be cut as deeply into the slope. If the owner is anticipating finishing of additional bedrooms in un- finished areas or additions, we recommend the OSDS be constructed to handle the additional loading. The installation of a properly sized OSDS to serve future buildout can be cost effective. The proposed sep- tic tank configuration will serve up to a 3 bedroom residence of less than 2000 SF. For greater than 3 bedrooms or 3 bedrooms with greater than 2000 SF, the septic tank must be upsized to 250 gallons per bed- room. Each additional bedroom larger than 2 bedrooms would require an additional 4807 SF of E -T type field based on current design data. We recommend the surface of the E -T field be seeded after installation of the system. A good native grass cover will promote E -T. We recom- mend a seed mix such as "Foothills, Pasture, or Prairie" mixes avail- able at local seed stores. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed over the field. The owner must realize an OSDS is different from public sewer service. The owner must assume the responsibility for maintenance of the sys- tem. The system is relatively maintenance free, but the owner must have the septic tanks pumped. We recommend the tank be pumped every 2 years. There are daily considerations, such as not putting plastic or other nonbiodegradable material into the sewage system. Water use must be monitored so toilets are not allowed to run when seals mal- function. To illustrate the point, a running toilet will consume in excess of 1000 gallons per day if allowed to run. An excess 1000 GPD loading could flood and irreparably harm the field and stress the well. Oo 3 We caution against installation of a water softener. The hydraulic loading from the backwash of a water softener can be detrimental to • OSDS and a separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash waste, if a water softener is installed. No landscaping or plastic can be used over the field, which will reduce evapotranspiration from the field. Chemically treated water from a swimming pool or spas should not be introduced into the OSDS. LIMITATIONS - A E -T design requires installation by a contractor who is experienced in its installation. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted. If subsurface condi- tions considerably different from those described in this report are encountered, we should evaluate the effect of the changes on the pro- posed OSDS. If modifications to this design are made by governing Health Departments, we should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the performance of our OSDS design. If there are any questions, please call. E. 0. CHURCH, INC, ` 0 RE(,`, Edward 0. Churc E. 13172 EOC 3 copies sent -OHO cc: Mike Morgan, 3651 Austin Road, Brawley, CA 89227 cc: Nelson Environmental and Wastewater, Ltd. WRI, n�lcswe am, E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS September 13, 1995 Mike Morgan c/o Tony Rutgers 512 Spruce Street Aspen, CO 81611 Subject: Onsite Sewage Disposal System Design Parcel 42, Sopris Mountain Ranch, Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Morgan, As requested, we have reviewed subsurface conditions and percolation tests performed at the subject site by Nelson Environmental and Waste- water Solutions, Ltd., (Nelson) dated September 7, 1995. The purpose of our review was to evaluate subsurface conditions and to design an Onsite Sewage Disposal System (OSDS). SITE CONDITIONS - The site is an approximate 1.48 acre parcel in a rural area of Pitkin County, Colorado. The location of the proposed residence, profile pit and percolation tests are presented on Fig. i. The slope at the proposed field area is 16% to the east. The ground surface has a moderate cover of grass and native vegetation. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - A 2 bedroom cabin residence is proposed to be moved to the house location as indicated on Figs. 1 and 2. The cabin has less then 2000 square feet (SF). The sewage loading for a 2 bed- room dwelling is 300 gallons per day (GPD), 525 GPD with a 1.75 factor to determine the design load. The design loading includes a garbage grinder, dish washer and washing machine. The site will be served water by an onsite well located at the southwest corner of the proper- ty, which is 120 feet from the proposed E -T field. Discharge from any water softener, spas or pool should not be directed to the OSDS. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - Subsurface conditions were investigated by Nelson at the locations indicated on Fig. 1. Subsurface conditions consisted of 2.25 feet of dark gray silty topsoil underlain by 1 foot of dark brown silty clay, underlain to 8 feet by stiff brownish -tan clay. No free water was encountered nor was observed 1 day after excavation in the profile pit. Percolation rates ranged from 27 to 32 minutes per inch (MPI) in the northern portions of the site, to 240 to 480 MPI in the southern portions of the field area. A copy of the Nelson data is attached. RECOMMENDATIONS - The poor percolation of the soil in the southern portion of the proposed field dictate a E -T type OSDS will be requir- ed. The system is proposed to the north of residence as indicated on Fig. 2, with a septic tank and dined E -T field. We recommend the in- 64 stallation of a 1000 gallon two compartment precast concrete septic U 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 60218 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80439 (303) 832.9692 FAX (303) 832.3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 2 tank. Because of the required area of the field, we believe a lift station will be required for to access the west field, as indicated on Fig. 2 and 4. The design of the field is based on using the 525 GPD for a 2 bedroom home, the conversion factor 586, and 32 inches of lake evaporation per year based on the US Department of Commerce Weather Bureau Technical pp Paper No. 37, as attached. The total area of field required _L-. 4Z 'YO SF. We recommended- f'eld be installed in two 100 by 46 oof t fields for an area of 9600 SF 69ischarge would be to the western field, with serial distribu o the east field. Details of the proposed E -T field are pres ted on Fig. 2 and 3. Onsite materials can be used to form the edges of the bed areas. r1a200 S.F. Dispersal gravel and E -T sand meeting Pitkin County Health Department requirements should be placed with a track mounted loader or backhoe. Rubber tired equipment which will compact or seal the sand should not be used. Graveless units such as "Infiltrator" may be substituted for gravel in the bed. This design is being submitted to obtain a septic permit. We believe there are more appropriate designs which could include a design based on: 1. a "water balance" for an E -T field, or 2. a "drip irrigation" OSDS system. We understand you would like us to proceed with the alternatives, but we need to obtain data for a design with a water balance and approval for a drip -irrigation system. Anticipated field areas will be smaller based on some infiltration of effluent. With a smaller area requirement, the fields will not have to be cut as deeply into the slope. If the owner is anticipating finishing of additional bedrooms in un- finished areas or additions, we recommend the OSDS be constructed to handle the additional loading. The installation of a properly sized OSDS to serve future buildout can be cost effective. The proposed sep- tic tank configuration will serve up to a 3 bedroom residence of less than 2000 SF. For greater than 3 bedrooms or 3 bedrooms with greater than 2000 SF, the septic tank must be upsized to 250 gallons per bed- room. Each additional bedroom larger than 2 bedrooms would require an additional 4807 SF of E -T type field based on current design data. We recommend the surface of the E -T field be seeded after installation of the system. A good native grass cover will promote E -T. We recom- mend a seed mix such as "Foothills, Pasture, or Prairie" mixes avail- able at local seed stores. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed over the field. The owner must realize an OSDS is different from public sewer service. The owner must assume the responsibility for maintenance of the sys- tem. The system is relatively maintenance free, but the owner must have the septic tanks pumped. We recommend the tank be pumped every 2 years. There are daily considerations, such as not putting plastic or other nonbiodegradable material into the sewage system. Water use must be monitored so toilets are not allowed to run when seals mal- function. To illustrate the point, a running toilet will consume in excess of 1000 gallons per day if allowed to run. An excess 1000 GPD loading could flood and irreparably harm the field and stress the well. We caution against installation of a water softener. The hydraulic loading from the backwash of a water softener can be detrimental to OSDS and a separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash waste, if a water softener is installed. No landscaping or plastic can be used over the field, which will reduce evapotranspiration from the field. Chemically treated water from a swimming pool or spas should not be introduced into the OSDS. LIMITATIONS - A E -T design requires installation by a contractor who is experienced in its installation. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted. If subsurface condi- tions considerably different from those described in this report are encountered, we should evaluate the effect of the changes on the pro- posed OSDS. If modifications to this design are made by governing Health Departments, we should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the performance of our OSDS design. If there are any que- j4vkT�lease call. E. 0. CHURCH, IN O.Qpp,� 13172 Edward O. Church:E.Q_�3 EOC 3 copies sent cc: Mike Morgan, 3651 Austin Road, Brawley, CA 89227 cc: Nelson Environmental and Wastewater, Ltd. r PARCEL &42 SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO �,Q'VD :La5 1 ` PROFILE PIT USED DROOM DENCE 1 " 1 I " I . LI\ JI V. 11 L TANK JOB N0. 6'20 90 SCALE 1`40' r r � SITE PLAN AND LOCATION OF PROFILE PIT AND PERCOLATION HOLES FIG. l PARCEL a42 SCALE SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH 1 . =40 PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO PROPOSED E -T FIELD: TWO SECTIONS 1 WITH SERIAL DISTRIBUTION 1 48 ' X 100 ' = 4600 S.F. I4800 S.F. X 2 FIELDS = 9600 S.F. TOTAL 1 1 1 � I PROPOSED 1000 GALLON '. TWO COMPARTMENT \ 1 PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK LIFT STATION � 4 INCH PVC SEWER LINE PROPOSED 2 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 1 1 1 I ! EXISTING GRAVEL WATER WELL PARKING AREA / EXISTING 2000 GALLON eC�� WATER STORAGE TANK LOCATION OF PROPOSED OSOS ,JOB Na 6720 91 FIG. 2 r - A. SCHEMATIC INFLUENT INSTALL TWO SECTIONS WITH SERIAL DISTRIBUTION B. CROSS SECTION UPHILL - DRAIN EVAPORATIVE SAND SWALE PITKIN COUNTY TOPSOIL SPECIFICATIONS I 20 4' 24'1 eo eo rpe 00`_ 'Oa ems` 'Oa o a r o e4 -GRAVEL 1 1/2 INCH DIAMETER I 16',y 48' JOB NO. 6720 Ga FG. 3 1000 GALLON TAWCOMPARTMENT PRECAST CONCRETE SEN TANK OR SEPARATE 500 GALLON CHAMBER 6' DIAMETER PVC WITH CAP ACCESS LID iii i i 7 - ELECTRICAL SPLICE BOX IL POWER LINE FROM DEDICATED CIRCUIT it • • L INLET FROM FIRST SEPTIC - TANK - rUMi' LNt I DISTRIBUTION VALVES UNION JOINT FOR QUICK DISCONNECT HIGH WATER ALARM ON/OFF FLOAT EFFLUENT PUMP MASONRY OR CONCRETE BLOCK SPECIFICATIONS: 1. GOULD PUMP 1/3 HP HIGH HEAD MODEL 3665 OR EQUIVALENT 2 -INCH DISCHARGE 30GPM/25 HEAD 2. PUMP ON LEVEL WITH A MINIMUM OF 150 GALLONS AVAILABLE FOR PUMPING. 3. INSTALL PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE AT HIGH POINT IN PUMP LINE. 4. AUDIBLE ALARM IN BUILDING. ALARM LEVEL 3 INCHES ABOVE 150 GALLON LEVEL OF TANK. TANK ALERT 101 HW. JOB NO. 6720 G3 PUMP CHAMBER DETAIL FIG. 4 b310i3./1335 1<: <6 BOB NELSON, t% - I1 !nelson Emlaty nwn=1 S Wastewater Solutions. DA E September 7, 1995 W Mr. and Mrs bftke Morgan S 3651 Austin Road Brawley, CA M27 PAGE e2 Subject: Sols Evaluation and Percolation Test for Individual Sewage System Design for the Moran Residence, Parcel 42, Sopris Mountain Ranch Subdivision, Sopris Mountain Ranch Road, Pitkin County, CO Dear M&e and Dierdre, As requested, Nelson Environmental and Wastewater Solutions, Ltd., performed a soils study and percolation tests to design a septic system for the proposed residence. We conducted this study in accordance with Article 5 of Pitkin County In " " n I Smage DisposalSvstem REgulation We have based our recommendations on the subsurface conditions encountered Please furnish this letter and the forthcoming design from E. O. Church, Inc to the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department at your earliest convenience to obtain a permit to construct this individual sewage system. The existing residence ig 1 log ilro(ture bong lucatcd from another part of the property to this Duildtng ertvetvpeit is a two bedmorn, two bathroom, Mo -story house with lcss than 21Y-)0 square feet of living area. Subsequent plans call fora fithure addition that will increase the size. of the house to three bedrooms and four bathrooms. (puce complete!, the house will be approximately 3500 square feet in size. The property is in the Sopris Mountain Ranch Subdivision and is 51.69 acres in size The domestic wtaet supply for the property is to be from a drilled artesian well that has been recently completes. The ground surface, which appears natural in the proposed am of the absorption field, slopes to the FASt at a ItY/a gmde- fhe building envelope on the property is covered with aspect trees, oak bm* and servicebeny. A soil profile pit, within 10 feet of the proposed absorption area, was excavated to a depth of approrimatety eight feet. No groundwater wn encountered 2nd bedrock mac not prevent within eight feet of the surface of the ground. The soil profile can be characterized as approximately 28 inches of dark pay. W tw*6L 12 inches of dark brown silty clay, and 56 inches of hard, brownish -tan clay that exhibited some tendency to sweu upon wetting P.O. Box 6961 Snowatass Village, CO. 81615 Office (303) 9233289 Home (303) 923.2766 1`j Il 09/' a B/ 1995 12:26 Morgan Residence Soils Evaluation and Percolation Test for Individual Sewage System Design Tract 42, Sopris Mountain Ranch Subdivision September 7, 1995 Page 2 BOB NELSON, ,%LTD PAGE 03 The subsurface soil conditions were evaluated ted with the standard percolation test procedure at the approximate location shown on Figure 1. The test holes were excavated by hand in the bottom of the backhoe pits. The subsoil in which two of the percolation tests (# 1 and' 2) were run, consisted of the brownish tan clay. These clays were well consolidated These test holes were presoaked for over 24 hours to allow the expansive clay to become saturated. The rates measured in these test holes averaged 360 minutes per inch. The clay soil is :at ccnside',ed acceptable for a conventional infiltration design for the on-site sewage system. On the slopes farther to the North of the staked cabin location, the percolation test holes, while dug to approximately the same depth, were located with the bottom in the topsoil and the dark silty clay subsoil gust beneath. Thecae test holes were presoaked the evening before the test and Again for eight hour before the percolation test measurements were taken Tluc , ntca were considerably faster, and averaged 30 minutes per inch. The results of all measurements are prescrsted is Table L We refer you to F. O. Church Engineering in Denver to develop a site-specific design that address these specific soil conditions within the building envelope. Limitations This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area for use for sewage disposal design purposes- The conclusions and recomirwridations submitted in this report are bated upon data obtained from our site visits at the location indicated - There is some possibility that the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface soils across the site may not have been evident at the time of this investigation, and may need additional evaluation if further excavation reveals conditions different from those described_ This office should be advised of any unusual situations as soon as possible so we may reevaluation of our recommendations. If you have questions or if we may be of further assistance, please call the ofbed.T� Sincerely, Reviewed By: r v . Z n 1317 Robert F. Nelson Ed Church, P.E. """,0 . .•aC> President E. O. Church, Inc., Ct,.• cal Engineer cc: Tony Rutgers Wrine Paulson Glenn Meehan, Dreager Excavating I . a ■ 4 09/08/1995 12:26 30766 BOB NELSM, J%C i, Ne&ax Buv&onmenw s wastewater sok mono ztd E W TABLE S PASS C5 PERCOLATION TLST RESULT FORM Hole Length Depth at Depth at Drop in Average Hole Depth of Interval Stan of Interval End of Interval Water Level Percolation No. (m.) (Mnutes) (Inches) (Inches) (inches) Rate(Min./inch) 1 40 30 7 613/16 I14 30 613/16 6 11116 118 30 6 11116 6 9116 US 240 2 38 30 75/16 71/4 1/16 30 71#4 73/16 1/16 30 73/16 71/8 1/16 480 3 37 10 43/16 3 13/16 3/8 10 3 13/16 3 1/2 5/16 10 3 1/2 3 118 318 10 3 1/8 2 13/lb 5116 10 213116 2112 5/16 32 4 39 10 69116 61/3 7,116 10 61/8 611/16 7/16 10 611/16 65/16 3/8 10 65116 6 5116 10 6 511/16 5/16 32 5 41 10 5 43/4 114 10 4 314 4 1/4 1/1 10 4 114 3 13/16 7/16 10 313/16. 3 3/8 7/16 10 33/8 3 3/8 27 Mke and Dienhe Morgan Property Parcel 42, Sopris Mourdain Ranch Subdivision I i Date of Percolation Teat: 08/22/95 and 08/23/95 P.O. Boz 6%1 Snowmass Village, CO.81615 Office (303) 923.3289 Home (303) 973.2766 I - . 09/06/1996 12:26 303966 IV Nelson Bnz*vmnenial b waweuwter Solute-, La E Property Address: Sopn Mountain Ranch Road W Legal Description: Parcel 42. Sopris Mountain Ranch Subdivision S Property Owner. Name Mr. and Mrs. Mike Morgan Address 3851 Austin Road, Bra*rlev.CA 89227 Local Phone (970) 9274700 Contractor Excavating Contractor. Name Tony Rutgers Name Dreat2er Excavadna Add 12 Solute SL Address P. O- Box 1000 Win, CO 81611 Basalt. CO 81821 Phone 925-8229 Phone 927-3431 Setarafim and Vweattrt( o Smeared surface remomf? X Yes o Gravel .A -Mc ' Yes Toa 4' Depth u Date mod T•.me prean9k water added 01022195 'et -L45 aa. ®d 0823195m o Amonot of Fennk winer added 3 to 5 01oas per teat Lose on MW 3 g1kns in test holes Ml h 02 on 9/23195 12 ldppltons in led Map #3,04.05 on 9(23!95 o Did water tern in Luta after ave riot presoak" o Wale re m"l ing m boles after ptesoW Hole 1: 3LYm No Hole 2: Yes ^ No Hole V Yea 1L No Hole 4: Ym X No File J. ,Yw b No Per rokirtae Rate mtefaaremew Hole 1 240 minuRm'inch Hole 2: 480 oumrteshDLh AVERAGE 360 mmmieslmch Hole 3: 32 mimsesmch Hok 4. 32 miutaealLa:h Hole 5: 27 tnmubcsu5ach AVERAGE 30000uaes1=h F 413E 06, Groundwater o Not Encandered to 8 ft.m profile o Ea4mRcd depth to luo s®saeel water irwx encmintered- 84 feet o Is ural believed to be subject to sc&wnzd fluctuations which could result in a wownN water table _ Ya X No Slops In abwrption area I(r1a to Eva Sedmk o Not Encountered at 9 A o Estimated depot ifaot.acwntetd>,40 feet o Type of bedracir: Clayanne Slinks aped Saadvme 1CFMMW Warhead u h Lwd6 k 6eliernl w he pnarcable7 — Y.. j& -N,. I certify that the above Information Is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and that all teaft were performed In accaWa,rce will'. U.a IAv 6isnu of Pllkiee Cr - i ual 3 ctrl R , Article 5•f thro4gh 5.8_ QQ REG/ Reviewed It A///WL— Robert F. Nelson Ed Chi, president E. O. MIMI P.O. Box 6961 SrKnvnu ss'Village, CO.81618 Office (303) 923.3289 Home (303) 923.2766 09/08/1995 12:26 ,6,;' s a � w A BOB t•EL.0 LTD PAGE 04 Ir Na..�'�. r' • N �+/ I Yb :l � � r � .I � " � •1 y�w� rea• - oti5' •f, Vit. • �� 11A I 4F12 F d� ii i sr•��� i Xf� r rJ rig rrrr, r'S+rr�f rr.r.r�lr.r' rrrf �{i� • aMSr' r.r' f rrr • 60 J, �r.i �,.•r f r �,• w 2 U.S. Department of Commerce It' Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 37 Evaporation Maps fo the U.S. Average Annual Lake Evaporation 1946-1955 • . s�'o' -Az`*- 1 a r SRI 1 31 :,.I...... ... \ . Ir6- y I• M"I 10I Y m LI)I� • �y •9051 sog 'O J F P P I- N Z ZI MK7 • W-0 P! -V q c A� KiSf(1043NIYd1 o H a # i F1." rW•I171. t •• I' V / illi �"�wwer=+e`.w. .. .... _ "�'•,- ._-.-.e,.c-.—:...�.,....-...,ip . _ I- ZI A� 41 i F1." rW•I171. t •• I' V / illi �"�wwer=+e`.w. .. .... _ "�'•,- ._-.-.e,.c-.—:...�.,....-...,ip . _ SEP -21-95 THU 2:11 PM WRA5- Rev. 76 tion must plete where )le. Type or n BLACK ) overstrikes ures unless SKEW DRILLING. DO FAX NO. 3033801 Ref # MH -26112 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES p 818 Cerntennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (X) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER (X) A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL FOR: (X) A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP I )REPLACEMENT FOR NO. — I )OTHER WATER COURT CASE NO. PLICANT • mailing address Mike Morgan 2651 Austin Road Brawley, Ca 92227 (state) (Zlp) ZONE NO. 3ATION OF PROPOSED WELL Pitkin I : of the SE Section 34 S, Rng. 87 W 6 P,M. 'N.S) IE.WI TER USE AND WELL DATA 1 maximum pumping rate (gpm) 15 innual amount of ground water 1.5 ,ropriated (acrefeet): Cg.. ) N #JRJi.L0AiQ Dept. 1 )f acres to be irrigated: Fax pp, - Y2 -F—' U f- total depth (feet): 160 round water is to be obtained from; Tributary veil designation ID WATER TO BE USED FOR: ISEHOLD USE ONLY • no irrigation (0) - IESTIC (1) ( 1 INDUSTRIAL (5) =STOCK (2) ( ) IRRIGATION (6) iMERCIAL (4) ( ) MUNICIPAL (8) ER (91 ML THE USE ON BACK IN (11) LLER Shelton Drilling Corp. P.O. Box 1059 BAsalt Co. 81621 Is tate) IZipl IeNo. 927-4182 tic. No. 1 095 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: 00 NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN Receipt No. / _ Basin Dist DITIO14S OF APPROVAL This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action.. Post -It" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 40t pages . 7b Al r From Co. Cg.. ) N #JRJi.L0AiQ Dept. Phone 2 7— Lf JO? Fax - 20--SO3 Fax pp, - Y2 -F—' U f- APPLICATION APPROVED PERMIT NUMBER _ DATE ISSUED EXPIRATION DATE BY, I.D. (STATE ENGINEER) COUNTY SEP -21-95 THU 2:12 PM SHE DRILLING CO FAX N0. 30801 (5) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WELL and the area on which the water will be used must be indicated on the diagram below. Use the CENTER SECTION (1 section, 640 acres) for the well location. I 14L--- 1 MILE. 5280 FEET I T + y----0 + t i NORTH SECTION LINE 1 I NORTH '� T T- = N � I 4- + Z p ~ I N m 4-- 1 II T N I Z .4- r 3 _ _� — i _ _ _ r m + T L — + - — -4-— SOUTH SECTION LINE +- The scale of the diagram is 2 inches = 1 mile Each small square represents 40 acres. WATER EQUIVALENTS TABLE (Rounded Flguresl An acre-foot covers I acre of land 1 loot deep - 1 cubic foot per second WS) .. 449 gallons per minute (9pm) A family of 5 wdl require eppro•imately t acre -loot of water per year. 1 acre-foot 43 560 cubic feet ... 325,900 gallons. 1,000 gpm pu.,,pea con .nuously for one day wod.ces 4.42 acre feet. (6) T;iE WELL MUST BE LOCATED BELOW by distances from section Imes. 410 ft. from South sec. line -AMPA! o (nmlh or south) 2630 ft. from West sec. line (east or west) LOT -42 --BLOCK FILING r SUBDIVISION Sopris Mtn. Ranch -- (7) TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED Owner: Mike Morgan No. of acres 35+ . Will this be the only well on this tract? yes (B) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM Plain Casing 7 in. from 0 ft. to 30 ft. 5 in. from 25 ft. to 130 ft, Perforated casing 5 in. from 130 ft. to 160 ft. in. from ft. to `t. (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS givedistance and direction from old well andplans for plugging it: (10) IND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED: Owner (s): Mike Morgan _ No. of acres. 35+ N 42 Sopris Mtn. Ranch (11) DETAILED DESCRIPTION of the use of groundwater: Household use and domestic wells must indicate type of disposal system to be used. All domestic uses including up to 3 dwellings, 1 ac. irragtion, domestic livestock with state and county approved septic and leach field. (12) OTHER WATER RIGHTS used on this land, including wells. Give Registration and Water Court Case Numbers. Type or right Used for (purpose) Description of land on which used (13) THE APPLICANTS) STATE(S) THAT THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE OF APPLrCANTIS) Use additional sheets of paper if more space is required. From: Wayne ehellon To: Tony Rutgen 16 DW: WPM Time: OM -.14 Z Paye 1 oft WELL COMPLETION AM TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO. OFFICE OF STATE ENGINEER n,errrxxorroHis GGfki )VG: tl Fw^li-0Idd 1. WELL PERMIT NUMBER: MH -26112 2. OWNEWS NAME (31: Mike Morgan Mailing Address : '/. 512 Spruce St. Ciry,St,Zip: Aspen, Co. 61611 Phone 3. WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED: SW 1/4 SE DISTANCE FROM SECTION LINES : FL From SUBDIVISION : Sopris Mtn Ranch STREET ADDRESS AT WELL LOCATION : 1/4 Sec. 34 Twp. Sec. Line And LOT : 42 BLOCK : BS Range 87W R. From Sec. Lire. Or FILING (UNIT) 4. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION It DATE COMPLETED : 08/17/95 TOTAL DEPTH : DRILLING METHOD : Air Rotary 160 ft. COMPLETED DEPTH : 160 0. S. GEOLOGICLOG: ,. HOLtu1AH.(n) i-lumtto WIN) Ov,C T,.r4 9.0 0.0 30 000-010 Shales, Clays 6.5 30 160 010-160 Mancos Shale 7 PLAIN CASING nn Vol owl W..a N- r.(e) royal 7.0 Steel 0.240 0.0 30 5.5 PVC .250 20 60 5.5 PVC .250 80 130 PERF.CASING: ScreenSictSin 5.5 PVC 1 .250 1 60 80 5.5 PVC .250 130 150 "'ATER LOCATED 60, 145 PE1�1ARkS I Haariw. Malarial Size Interval : FDT 10. GROUTING RECORD: Naana Mm umasy m&mw (uammn cement 3 sks 6 g/sk 10-30 poured 11. DISINFECTION Type : ATli Amt. Used : 3 oz. 12.WELL T451 DtTA : (J Check Box If Test Data Is Submitted On Supplemental Form Air Compressor Static Level : 0 IT Date/Tine Measured : 08/17/95 Production Rate PumoingLevd : 'Total fl. Date/Tiro Measured : 08/17/95 Test Length : 2 Remarks 15 gpm. hrs. rnwemwme :IMem[rv, mmenaen uw N.nwne tenreoraerea,nnaaexm upeveemyYneweede InM.uvnrounebne+rAw Itl1ItlUG'.a>nannp atvs .uaname <enseene:prryryinTe:e[eneawe mn i Mnrvlyd4.niLnv I iiiiylwny innl CONTRACTOR: SheltonDrilingCorp. Phone 1970) 9274182 Mailing Address : P.O. Box 1059 Basat, Co. 81621 Lic. No. 1095 Neme/Ttle (PleeseTypeorPrint) Wayne Shelton / President Signature Date 08/21/95 / C2 SEO-WTR DIV 5 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone(303)866-3581 fAX (303) 866-3589 Wayne Shelton 24S221IWY 82 P.O.IIoc 1059 Basalt, CO 81621 303-945-5665 RE: Monitoring/Ohservation Hole NOTTCE Owner. MIU Morgan Dear Mr. Shelton: Se 95 15:15 No.003 P.01 STATE OF COLORADO July 13, 1995 LIC 1095 DIV 5 COUNTY 49 WD 36 Roy Rn cr (:rnemrr Jane S. Lochhrad tarruav Direarw Mal D. Siirylton SUR.. r.aineer -[hank you for your faxed letter of July 11, 1995, notifying this office of your Intent to construct the subject monitoring and observation hole(s). The fib number issued by our office for each hole location(s) is listed below: 26112 MH -SOV Ys SR 14 Sec. 34, TR4; R87W, 6th P.M. rarest •42 Supris Mountain Ranch The construction of the hole(&) must be completed within three (3) months of the date of this acknowledgement. Testing and/or pumping shall not exceed a total of seven (7) days, unless prior written approval is obtained from the Division of Water Reawrcrs- The water diverted during testing shall not be used for beneficial purpose. Ille owner of the hole, or his authorized agent, shall be responsible for obtaining permit(&) and complying with all rules and regulations pertaining to the discharge of fluids produced during testing. Unless a permit 4s obtained, the hole(a) must be plugged within one (1) year after construction. A Well Plugging Report (formerly Abandonment Report) `,must be submitted within 60 days of abandonment. Your modification indicate that the MOW10ftA trerwiloo hob Is to be congrud d at a location where the Dakota Formation Is precut - According to Rule 9 of The Statewide Nontributary Ground Water Rules, a8 welk that are permitted pursuant to section 37-90- 1.17(4). CRS, that will be withdrawing any water (tributary or nontributary), from the Dakota Formation for nun -exempt purposes, must be geophyamuy logged Ills is required unless a geophysical log has been submitted for another well that has penetrated the Same aquifer (Dakota Formation) at a location within 1320 feel of the proposed well location. The minimum requirement stipulates that both resistivity and spontaneous potential (SP) logs be eonducted. This roust be done prior to installation of the well casing. Production from the Dakota Formation must be isolated from any other formation by the properly grouting and scaling the hole. A copy of your notice or this acknowledgement must accompany the drilling rig. All work must comply with the Water Well Construction Rules. Minimum construction standards (Rule 10) must be met, a variance obtained, or, where allowed, information provided staling why the intended use will be in conflict with meeting these minimum standards. Construction details, geologic logs, and test data, in the form of well construction and test reports (fort GWS -31), must be submitted to this office within sixty (60) days of the completion of the work by the licensed contractor, or authorized individual. The hole owner should maintain records of water quality testing and submit this data to the Division upon request, or upon plugging of the hole, the abowc fele number, owner's well note, and bwwea name sod atklrcats must be provided 00 all we11 permit appecadw(z� construe" and abandonment reports. Acknowledgement of this monitoring acid ob setvallon hole nod ea dos not indicate that well permlu can be approved. If you have any questions, please contact this office, or the Division office in Glenwood Springs. Post -R'- Fax Note 7671 nsts page& To Alt& Cv A4 t, Ph« s Phone s Fax s �. S� a Fax a , IMIi-Dakowllr 71-XWga cc: Division 5 �oy Sincerely, CCS'.—.� :'••�v:a �''� Steven G. Anderson for Tamara L. Cunningham SEO-WTR DIV 5 WATER WELLS 303-945-5665 ELEVATOR HOLES 10 9W;' HWY 02 P.D. Box 1059 BASALT, COLORADO 01921 (970) 927-0182 FAX (970) 977.3601 Lie. N 1095 7/11/95 Tamara Cunningham Colorado Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman St. Room $818 Denver, Co. 80203 RE: Monitoring/observation well Notification pear me. Cunningham, --95.---.15:15 No.003 P.02 TFGT HOPS RECEIVED ,JUL 11 1995 WA rt.I RkSou;jL:ES STATE ENGINEER. 4t(LO In accordance with Rule 12 of the water Well Construction and Pump Installation Rules of the Division of water Resources of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, the following information is submitted for Monitoring/observation Well(s) and/or Holes we have been requested to drill. Client: Mike Morgan 3949 Austin Road Brawley, Ca. 92227 Landowner: Same Location: SW} SE} and/or SE} SEz Section 34 TBS R87W 6th PM Parcel $ 42 Sopris Mountain Ranch Number: 1 - 3 Purpose: Quality and Quantity Test for Domestic Uses Start drilling (approximate): July 18, 1995 Hole Diameter: 6.5" Projected Depth(s): up to 500 feet Aquifers: 'tributary Comment: This information will be faxed to your office this date and the original will also be sent this date. Thank you. Sincerely, SEO-WTR i- i 6 DIV 5 Water Well Construction A Effective Date April 1, 1995 303-945-5665 Se El 15:16 No.003 P.03 or -the well shell be plugged and sealed. Flowing wells shall be constructed to prevent any leakage around the casing or adjacent to the well. RULE 11 MONITORING AND OBSERVATION HOLES AND TEST HOLES 11.1 General - Monitoring and observation holes and test holes may be constructed by an authorized individual, other than a well construction contractor. The requirements for being licensed and notifying the State Engineer are summarized in Table 1. All monitoring and observation holes and all test holes must comply with the construction and plugging standards specified in these Rules. The person authorized to construct and to plug these holes shall keep accurate records of their work. 11.2 Monitoring and Observation Holes 11.2.1 Prior to the start of construction of any monitoring and observation hole, the State Engineer shall be notified pursuant to Rule 6.3. The monitoring and observation hole or holes must be constructed within ninety (90) days of giving such notice. 11.2.2 The testing and/or pumping of any monitoring and observation hole shall not exceed a cumulative total of two hundred (200) hours unless prior written approval for additional testing is obtained from the State Engineer. The well owner or his agent shall be responsible for obtaining permits and complying with all rules and regulations pertaining to the discharge of all fluids produced during the testing. 11.2.3 All monitoring and observation holes shall be plugged and sealed within one (1) year after their construction unless a permit has been obtained from the State Engineer, 11.2.4 All lithologic logs, water level data and water sample analyses obtained from monitoring and observation holes shall be submitted to the State Engineer upon request. 11.3 Test Holes 11.3.1 Notice of the intent to construct shall be submitted to the State Engineer for those test holes which are expected to penetrate through a confining layer. Notice is not required for test holes which are not expected to penetrate a confining layer. (see Table 1). 11.3.2 Test holes shall be plugged and sealed within ninety 190► days of their construction. 1 1Z Submittal to the State Engineer of a lithologic log or completion report is not required unless the test hole penetrates through a confining layer between aquifers. RULE 12 MINIMUM PUMP INSTALLATION STANDARDS 12.1 General - All permanent pump installations shall be completed only by a pump installation contractor or a private pump installer. 15