HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.eh.247322100003 (1998)Document Layout
(From Most Recent to Oldest Permit)
Permit
Application
Log Sheet/Notes & Photos
Communications
As -built Design
Engineer Design
Soil Information
Water Permit & Information
Second System on property
Third System .etc.
Floor Plans
Please See Building and Land Use Approvals Files for additional information.
APP!-ICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
130 S. Galena SL. Aspen Colorado 81611
• Phone 970-920-5070(Fax 970-920-5039 # 7
A A
Permit e O Parcel IDN
Permit Far. New Installadpn Repair ( )
2/DD
Name oi�OWNER BRUCE ANO akrie .1/ E36gil
Street Address NeRtu FMS-/�koAp /
Owners Madinat Address�e000 /CCi✓H/�.COT.D�I/E �i4/,t/1AYT'KilPN205-
Susines.: Phone: (4,3) 2.�0 -7367 Hama Phone:Q/l dpI4 2 "1J " 7_267q4
2-2-1-00 `04?3 1
86-lo
♦o
Legal OrscnpvP
on: Lot - / 0 .Bock /�/oQ>N dGC ,Subdivision 5 5 r - -$3
Siza of loc :it% acres Type of proposed smucture: CAe lli Size of bldq. envelope: t4000 5
Total arewlivin t space (sq. ft): -4,1,60V a of Bedrooms, offices and similar size moms: Z
Caretaker Unit: ( lAttached 10etacnetl 1 Total areaAv,nq space of caretaker uri ft.) ! 1 *of Bedrooms offices and similar size rooms
Primary Contact Parson O d I / UGY/
Contact Mailing Address\ 177, R&/ 6-#A0! 7 DA 41A6 %Y'1S3 Y—la57
Business Phone (ZI �) /�J /_�y37 Call Phone : Fax a) Y) 357 4195-3
well ( )Sonnq ( )Stream ( ) Cotmmunay/Public (Name of
Is Proof of Adequate Water Attached ( Required ? ( ) Yes (p No (A water quality test and well pump test or approval letter from community system)
Has this project been approved by Pitkin County? jpQ Yas ( )NO
Is away of the floor plan attached (Required) ? (KYas ( ) No
No
Application for an individual sewage disposal system is he" submitted. I hereby candy that the above Infomhation is true and acwrere and that I have provided true and
accurate infol oration on locations of all existing and proposed wells. contour inter,all buildings. propeM/ lines, ditches. slopes. waterlines, springs, suction or Imgation lines.
drinking water cisterns. drain tiles, imgabaa atches, lakes, water courses. streams, floodPlains. dry gulches, and e=ing septic systems. I apknowledge that any false or
incomplete Information will imalidate the applicapon and arty subsequent permit. auanoa of me permit does not imply the approval of any other permt required for construction
pursuant b Pitkin Cowry codes. No construction may bey^dertaken w ri all approvals and permits nave been obtained. The owner assumes all hesponsvbdiues in case of failure
or inaosquacy of apt system. / _ - 1
._______________________________________________fardeoanmemysaoelow_____________________________________________
PERMIT FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
Design Criteria of system to be Installed ( Any changes must be submitted and approved in wntinal
Perc Rate 7 min per Inch . Profile Hole Depth % .� feet
Septic tank capacity: '750 gallons Absorption area: 7 sq. It.
P,,, .gyp 6.5 e &-12- X 6,5 /X?.5I
An Inspection is required prior to backfill of any component of the distribution system.
Design by Engineer Required I( )Yes( ) No All plans and specifications of the engineer must be followed. Any changes must be approved by the (n
AspermPitkin Envirommntal Health Department in writing and the engineer must certity the final installation to the Environmental Health Department in V
writing.._)
Permit approval by: Data .23
Plans and soedficauons n( the proposed inamd s wage disposal system have en reviewed and are considered satisfactory. dismission is hereby granted to the owner or
the agent to perform the wCrk indicated in awards a in the Pilldn County ISDS Regulation in affect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from Medals
that the permit' was 'issued urdess system construction has commenced or an eaension has been approved In writing by the Depanmem.
As -Built drawings must be in tidedwith W{ artglihetare the final approval will be issued.
Installer.aadl3 7 c/ -- 7 ( FI
1`6 3 Receipt # Site Plan ✓ Well Permit and Soils Test
Its 0 JD&Lii 7 Date received Floor Plan Water Quality Test or Date Info Complete
I L Received by Comm Dev Approval Water System Letter Friel Insp Requested
{ J'
Final Inspection Approval: �/ ('A' Date: �' -1 C 2 .esko,aee
--�
(3p b' 1119r � KJ)4—
b ao o
E
(A wG
Aspen / Pitkin Environmental Health DepartmeP
Contact Log Sheet
3
,i
7cV
--
-
uITIM
3
IPA
Gabe Preston, 10:46 AM 41117W, Barker Residence
X -Sender: gabep@comdev
`Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 10:46:48 -0600
To: nancym
From: Gabe Preston <gabep@ci.aspen.co.usn
Subject: Barker Residence.
Tommy Stewart can go ahead with the septic permit for the Barker Residence
2473-221-00-003 without a formal land use review. We exempt the building .
envelope amendments for septic systems for approvals that proceeded the
policy requiring the septic systems to be inside of the building envelope.
In this case, the proposed location for the septic system is the most
logical spot, and that is our main ooncem.
i
I
Connell Construction
P.O. Box 541057
Dallas, Texas 7 53 54-1057
Ms. Nancy MacKenzie
c/o Aspen Pitkin Environmental Dept.
130 S. Galena St.
Asoen. Co. 81611-1975
Enclosed for your files is a copy of the correspondence sent to Ms. Joanna Chaffner. I
would appreciate any assistance to expedite approval.
In reviewing the correspondence of October 5, 1997, from Nelson Environmental &
Wastewater Solutions, Ltd, there appears to be a confect with the subsoil study by
Hepworth-Pawlak in regards to the depth of the soil profile hole. The soils report reflects
a total depthtof 13'-0", not 11'-6". Therefore, using the minimum absorption area of 278
square feet as indicated in the letter of October 25, 1997, from Nelson Environmental and
a drywell pit depth of 6.5 ft., could we not have a pit dimension of 8.5 ft. by 8.5 ft.?
Please call to discuss.
Very tpully yours,
Thomas H. Stewart
Enclosure
cc: Bruce Barker
0 0
Connell Construction Company
P.O. Box 541057
Dallas, Texas 75354-1057
214/357-0235
0 March 26, 1998
Ms. Joanna Chaffner
Community Development
130 S. Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Barker Residence
Lot BB -10, North Fork Subdivision
North Fork Road
Meredith, Colorado
Dear Ms. Chaffner:
Following an onsite visit with Ms. Nancy MacKenzie and discussing the limitations because of size,
boulders, terrain, and trees presented in developing this lot, we are requesting an exemption to locate the
drywell absorption area outside the building envelope. Enclosed are photographs depicting the problems
with this site, as well as, the required engineering for the septic system as prepared by Nelson
Environmental & Wastewater Solutions, Ltd. As you can see, the location for the septic system is in the
only open area besides the location for the proposed residence.
We are hoping to submit plans for a building permit next month, but as you know, first need the
issuance of a septic permit.
The Barkers received a Minor 1041 Hazard Review approval in 1995 on this property. At that time it
was not contemplated that all septic system work had to be within the building envelope. Because of the
small size of this lot and the many trees and other conditions, we hope you will look favorably upon our
request.
Very truly yours
CO L C S UCTION COMPANY
Thomas H. Stewart, President
Construction Coordinator for
Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Barker
THS/kf
enclosure
2351 W. Northwest Hwy. • Suite 2301 • Dallas, Texas 75220 • FAX (214) 357-4953
Nelson Environmental •Wastewater Solutions, Ltd •
E
W October 25, 1997
S Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Barker
6000 Reinhardt Drive
Fairway Kansas 66205
Subject: Layout and Possible Construction Recommendations for an Individual Sewage System
on a I -acre Parcel of Land, Lot BB -10, North Fork Subdivision, numbered off North Fork Road,
Pitkin County, Colorado
Dear Gerry and Bruce,
As requested, Nelson Environmental and Wastewater Solutions, Ltd., has reviewed the building
site and performed the soils study and percolation test data presented to the Aspen/Pitkin County
Environmental Health Department for their design. We have also applied for a permit to
construct a septic system for the residence at the subject site on your behalf This letter details
some possible construction alternatives available.
Proposed Construction:
The planned residence is a two bedroom, one and three-quarter bathroom, one and one -half -story
frame cabin. The total living area of the house is calculated to be about 1600 square feet.
The property is to be served by a drilled well domestic water supply. The well drilling is
completed, however the pump has not been set and there is no electricity to the well head.
Site Conditions:
The site is a lot in the North Fork area of the Frying Pan River Valley. Typical of the lots in this
portion of the subdivision, the building site is located in an area covered with evergreen trees, pine
and spruce. The North Fork of the Frying Pan River is located about twenty feet north of the
north property line. Along the edge of the river, there is a small riparian areas vegetated by
willows.
The ground surface, which appears natural in the proposed area of the building and within the
proposed drywell absorption pit, slopes rather gently to the Northwest at 7%. There are no
irrigation or drainage ditches on the site.
The development of the lot does present a few limitations to the construction of onsite sewage
disposal system on the property. The separation from the house to the absorption area is to be a
minimum of 20 feet. The separation from the well head to the absorption area is a minimum of
100 feet. Further, a minimum 10 foot setback from property lines to the absorption area is
required Considering these setbacks and a policy that the septic system be located within the
building envelope, there is little available room for the construction of a septic system absorption
P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Office (970) 923.3289 Home 6r Fax (970) 923.2766
I
0
Barker Cabin
Lot BB -l0
North Fork Subdivision
October 25. 1997
area between the house and property boundaries, as the site is now planned. However, we have
been lead to believe that there may be an exemption available to locate the drywell absorption area
outside the building envelope, and we will pursue this with the Aspen/Pitkin County
Environmental Health Dept
Minimum Pitkin County Requirements
The percolation rate in the sand and gravel subsoils was measured at 7 minutes per inch at a
depths varying between three and one-half and eleven and one-half feet. The moist subsoils were
remarkably consistent to that depth.
It is our interpretation that the minimum Pitkin County requirements for the residential septic
system will be based on an average daily flow to the septic system of 300 gallons per day, if the
house is eventually determined to have two bedrooms. However, most of the design parameters
for the various components of the septic system are sized on the basis of peak design flow, 175%
of the average daily flow. This means that the sizing of the system will be based on a total design
flow of 525 gallons per day. Under the code in effect, this design flow would require a total
minimum septic tank volume of 750 gallons. Based on the measured percolation rate, a minimum
of 278 square feet of absorption area is also expected to be required. In our opinion, seepage pits
or shallow absorption bed or trench construction will not provide the minimum required
absorption area and still meet all of the code -mandated minimum setback requirements
Recommended On-site Wastewater Disoosal Alternatives
As mentioned, under the regulations, the residence onsite sewage disposal system would be
required to treat an average domestic wastewater flow of at least 300 gallons per day, depending
on the determination of the number of bedrooms. A septic tank with a minimum volume of at
least 750 gallons must be installed. However, we feel that with the site constraints on the small
lots, that you plan for and install a septic system that slightly exceeds minimum requirements.
As a result, we suggest that a 1000 -gallon concrete septic tank be installed, The manhole lids of
the tanks should be brought to the surface of the ground with riser ring assemblies.
There are few possible alternatives to address the sizing and configuration of the absorption areas
for the house and still follow the Pitkin County Regulations now in effect and adopted as of May
30, 1995. To install an absorption field with a level bottom, the excavation would be very rocky
and uneven, and must parallel the south building envelope line to meet the setbacks from the
house foundation, well and the property lines Seepage pit construction does not appear to be
possible due to setbacks.
Barker Cabin
Lot BB -10
North Fork Subdivision
October 25. 1997
Therefore, the suggested layout incorporates the drywell alternative listed below.
Under the regulations, a category separating the requirements of a seepage pit from a drywell was
adopted. The drywell is defined as a soil absorption system filled with gravel and containing a
system of distribution that is designed on the basis of sidewall and bottom absorption area. The
drywell is required to be located to meet the minimum setbacks of 100 feet from the well head, 25
feet from any drinking water supply line, and 10 feet from property lines- Drywells are permitted
in soils with a percolation rate faster than sixty minutes per inch and have the following
construction criteria:
a) Drywells are filled with clean graded rock extending from the bottom of the pit
excavation to at least two inches above the inlet pipe.
b) A four -inch vertical stand pipe must be attached to the end of the distribution line with
a tee fitting and must extend completely to the bottom of the drywell and up to finished
grade The vertical stand pipe must be fitted with a removable cap to be used as an
inspection pipe.
c) The absorption area of the drywell must be computed on the basis of pert rates in each
substratum penetrated and a weighted average of the results must be used to obtain a
design value.
d) The effective area of the drywell is calculated by adding the area of the sidewalls below
the horizontal inlet line and the area of the bottom of the pit
Using the percolation rate and soils information and applying the above criteria and the sizing
formula established in the Pitkin County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulation
(Revised May 1995), it is our opinion that by using the construction alternative of drywells it is
possible to fit in the absorption areas for the house in a manner that meets all setback criteria and
causes the least amount of surface disruption. The absorption system area suggested will require
a drywell pit excavated to a surface dimension of 10 feet square and a depth of 7 feet below the
inlet pipe. An effective sidewall and bottom absorption area of 380 square feet is provided within
this drywell installation. This is slightly more than the minimum required area under regulation
The drywell excavation can be located in the area of the property excavated outside the building
envelope, and should conform to all sizing criteria and minimum setback requirements of the
County. The system would use gravity flow to the drywell.
The use of low water use toilets, flushing on 1.6 gallons or less, is required and will further reduce
the wastewater flow to the system (from a peak flow of 1050 gallons per day to an actual
estimated flow of approximately 600 gallons per day). However, no further reductions in
Barker Cabin
Lot BB -10
North Fork Subdivision
October 25, 1997
absorption area size are recommended or permitted by the Environmental Health Department at
this time.
We have assumed an exemption to the need to locate the drywell absorption area within the
building envelope, and have been led to believe that this is possible If you have questions or if
we may be of further assistance, please call the office.
Sincerely,
Robert F. Nelson
President
cc: Tommy Stewart, Connell Construction
Jamie Darnell, El Dorado, Inc.
iJ
ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTME
ISDS DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
Permit #
Name Barker Parcel ID #
House Size 1,600 (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 75
Number of Bedrooms, Lofts, Offices, Similar Rooms, Main House 2
Number of Bedrooms, Lofts, Offices, Similar Rooms, Caretaker unit
Average Daily Waste Flow 300 # bedrooms X 2 people/br X 75
State Review Required? no (make sure to use state # of bedrooms)
Perc Rate 7 (T)
Design Flo w (Q) _ # bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75
Q= 525
Absorption Area = 5 X SORT)
A = 277.8039 sq. . of absorption area required
in lltrator units without reduction
or 92.6013 lineal feet of 3' wide trenches
The maximum 30% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system.
ONLY if lot and soil conditions are optimal, which they are not on this lot, due to the poor soil
percolation rate.
Type of system: []Absorption trenches []Absorption bed [] Gravelless chambers
[]Dry well []Seepage Pit []Pumping Chamber
Minimum tank capacity 656.25 gallons
SETBACK FROM WELL
# of feet = 100
Remember: 8 feet of additional distance for each 100 gallons/day of design flow over 1,000 gal/da
should be added unless an RPE can verify that it is not necessary to prevent contamination.
Printed on Recycled Paper
11
0
To: Tommy Stewart
From: Nancy MacKenzie
0
ASPEN - PITKIN
Date: January 23, 1998 FNIROMA TAL HELL DEPA ENT
Re: Getting approval from the Pitkin County Community
Development Department to place the Bruce Barker sewage
disposal field/drywell outside the building envelope
1) FYI- I have not received the fax that you were going to
send on Tuesday 1/20.
2) I am sending you the soil information done by Bob
Nelson which you said you had not received from Bob.
The data indicates that the perc rate is mpi. and the
depth of the profile hole is 11-1/2 ft. I``
For a 2 bedroom house of 1,600 sq feet with a perc rate
of 9 mpi,. 315 sq ft of absorption area is required.
Since the profile hole needs to indicate suitable soil
4 feet below the depth of the proposed drywell; the bottom
of the drywell would end at a depth of 7-1/2 feet. If the
top of the drywell begins 2-1/2 feet below the surface of
the soil, the depth of the actual drywell would be 5 feet.
To achieve 315 sq ft of abortion area, the drywell
dimensions would ne d to be .5 ft X 10.5 ft X 5 ft,deep.
10.5 X'5 X 4 =2 0sq t for the 4 sidewall absorption
areas
10.5 X 10.5 = 110 ft for the bottom absorption area
210 + 110 = 320 tot 1 ft y(yd
3) Your submission packet to Community Development should
include a plat of the property showing contours and building
envelope, or possibly you could 'just use the drawing in
Bob's soil data which shows the location of the perc test
holes.
The drawing could include both the old and proposed
locations for the drywell.'To substantiate the moving of the
drywell site from within the building envelope to outside
the building envelope, you might want to indicate on the
plat the location of trees and boulders or other physical
1 130 Som GALENA STREET ASPEN, CoLoRAOo 81611-1975 • PHONE 970.920.5070 FAx 970.920.5197
P.W m Peryhd PQM
9
11
"features that would show that one area is better than
another.
You should also indicate distances to show that the
location you are proposingcomplies with Table II, "Table of
Minimum Horizontal Distances in Feet Between Components of a
Sewage Disposal System and Pertinent Physical Features",
from the Pitkin County Individual Sewage Disposal System
Regulations.(setback distances of the drywell and septic
tank from property lines, buildings, well, etc.
4) I have enclosed the photographs I took of the property
which you could include in your packet to Community
development to help them visualize the property.
'`-features that would show that one area is better than
another.
You should also indicate distances to show that the
location you are proposing.complies with Table II, "Table of
Minimum Horizontal Distances in Feet Between Components of a
Sewage Disposal System and Pertinent Physical Features",
from the Pitkin County Individual Sewage Disposal System
Regulations.(setback distances of the drywell and septic
tank from property lines, buildings, well, etc.
4) I have enclosed the photographs I took of the property
which you could include in your packet to Community
development to help them visualize the property.
ILP
Neison Environmental Wastewater Solutions, Ltd •
E
W
S Octoter 5, 1997
Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Barker
6000 Reinhardt Drive
Fairway Kansas 66205
Subject: Soils Evaluation and Percolation Test for Individual Sewage System Design for a 1/2 -
acre Parcel of Land, Lot BB -10, North Fork Subdivision, numbered off North Fork Road, Pitkin
County, Colorado
Dear Gerry and Bruce,
As requested, Nelson Environmental and Wastewater Solutions, Ltd., performed a soils study and
percolation tests on the subject property to design a septic system for the proposed residence.
We conducted this study according to Section 5-1 through 5-5 of Pitkin County Individual
Sewage Disposal System Regulation (Revised May 1995) on October 2, 1997. We have met
previously on the site with the representative of the Environmental Health Department to review
site conditions and receive advice on septic system placement. We have based our
recommendations on the subsurface conditions encountered. We will furnish this letter and an
individual sewage disposal system permit application to the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health
Department at our earliest opportunity, so that you may obtain a permit to construct this sewage
system.
Proposed Construction:
The planned residence is a two bedroom, one and three-quarter bathroom, one and one -half -story
frame cabin. The total living area of the house is calculated to be about 1600 square feet.
The property is to be served by a drilled well domestic water supply. The well drilling is
completed, however the pump has not been set and there is no electricity to the well head.
Site Conditions:
The site is a lot in the North Fork area of the Frying Pan River Valley. Typical of the lots in this
portion of the subdivision, the building site is located in an area covered with evergreen trees, pine
and spruce. The North Fork of the Frying Pan River is located about twenty feet north of the
north property line. Along the edge of the river, there is a small riparian areas vegetated by
willows.
The ground surface, which appears natural in the proposed area of the building and within the
proposed drywell absorption pit, slopes rather gently to the Northwest at 7%. There are no
irrigation or drainage ditches on the site.
(-� P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Office (970) 923.3289 Home & Fax (970) 923.2766
0
Barker Cabin
Lot BB -10
North Fork Subdivision
October 5, 1997
Subsurface Conditions:
A soil profile pit, just outside the building envelope and adjacent to an area considered suitable for
an on-site wastewater disposal system absorption field, was excavated. The excavation revealed
that no groundwater or bedrock present within eleven feet of the surface of the ground.
The soils on the property consisted of approximately 6 inches of gray sandy loam topsoil
overlaying a lighter brown very sandy loam grading to sand, gravel, and cobble fragments, from
three to four inches in diameter to over two feet in diameter below a depth of three feet. The
subsoil was relatively more sandy and gravelly toward the bottom of the profile pit excavation.
Percolation Testing:
The subsurface soil conditions were evaluated with the standard percolation test procedures at the
approximate location shown on Figure 1. The subsoil, in which the percolation testing was done,
consisted of sand and gravel. These tan sandy soils were slightly moist and well consolidated, and
showed no tendency to swell upon wetting. The test holes were prepared by hand -digging small
holes at three depths within the soil profile backhoe excavation. The depths of the percolation test
holes ranged from three and one half to eleven feet. Three inches of gravel were placed in each
test hole after all loose soil had been removed and the test hole sidewalls roughened. We
attempted to avoid any smearing of the soil surfaces during the test hole preparation.
Percolation testing was performed in holes within the profile pit dug in the general vicinity of
proposed absorption drywell location, but outside the building envelope. The percolation holes
were pre-soaked by adding water to a depth of six inches above the gravel layer at regular
intervals throughout the day. An initial filling of approximately six gallons was done the morning
the test was conducted. Water was then added to the test holes every hour or two for eight hours
the rest of the day. When the test measurements began, the test holes contained about 2 inches of
water from the last a refilling thirty minutes previously, and were refilled, as necessary, to a depth
of six to seven inches above the bottom of each test hole.
The results of the percolation testing arepres ented i T le I. These results indicate the sandy
gravel soils have an average percolation rate 0Q nutinch, and are considered acceptable
for a conventional soil infiltration on-site sewag system.
Limitations: This report has been prepared according to generally accepted practices in this area
for use for sewage disposal design purposes. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in
this report are based upon data obtained from our site visits at the location indicated. There is
some possibility that the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface soils across the site may
not have been evident at the time of this investigation, and may need additional evaluation, if
/8
Barker Cabin
Lot BB -10
North Fork Subdivision
October 5, 1997
further excavation reveals conditions different from those described. This office should be
advised of any unusual situations as soon as possible so that we may reevaluate our
recommendations.
If you have questions or if we may be of further assistance, please
Sincerely, /
Robert F. Nelson, R.E.H.S.
President
cc: Tommy Stewart, Connell Construction
Jamie Darnell, El Dorado, Inc.
I ('
Reviewed By:
�ro7
ay ammond, P.
Schmueser, Gordon
Nelson Environmental & Wastewater Solutions, Ltd
E
W TABLE I
S PERCOLATION TEST RESULT FORM
Hole Length Depth at Depth at . Drop in Average
Hole Depth of Interval Start of Interval End of Interval Water Level Percolation
No. (in.) (Minutes) (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) Rate(Mn./Inch)
1 120
5
55/16
21/2
213/16
(refill)
6
415/16
31/2
17/16
6
3 1/2
21/2
1
(refill)
6
57/8
41/2
1 3/8
6
41/2
35/16
13/16
6
35/16
23/8
15/16
(refill)
6
61/4
47/8
13/8
6
47/8
3 1/2
1 3/8
6
3 1/2
21/2
1
6
21/2
19/16
15/16 6.4
2 139
6
61/2
41/2
2
6
41/2
29/16
1 15/16
(refill)
6
61/8
-45/8
1 1/2
6
45/8
33/8
11/4
6
33/8
23/8
1
(refill)
6
63/4
53/16
19/16
6
53/16
41/8
1 1/16
6
41/8
3 1/4
7/8
6
3 1/4
23/16
1 1/16 5.6
3 40
6
61/2
413/16
111/16
6
413/16
311/16
11/8
6
3 11/16
25/8
1 1/16
(refill)
6
53/4
47/8
7/8
6
47/8
41/16
13/16
6
41/16
3 3/8
11/16
6
33/8
25/8
3/4
(refill)
6
61/4
5 5/8
7/8
6
55/8
47/8
3/4 8
Barker Residence
North Fork Road
Lot BB -10 - Section 22, TBS, R83W of the 6th P.M., Pitkin County, Colorado
Date of Percolation Test: 10/2/97
I 0o P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Office (970) 923.3289 Home & Fax (970) 923.2766
Nelson Environmental & Wastewater Solutions, Ltd
E
w
TABLE I
S
PERCOLATION TEST RESULT FORM
Hole
Length
Depth at
Depth at
Drop in
Average
Hole Depth of Interval Start of Interval End of Interval
Water Level
Percolation
No. (in.)
(Minutes) (Inches)
(Inches)
(Inches)
Rate(Min./Inch)
1 120
5
55/16
21/2
2 13/16
(refill)
6
415/16
3 1/2
17/16
6
3 1/2
21/2
1
(refill)
6
57/8
41/2
13/8
6
41/2
35/16
1 3/16
6
35/16
23/8
15/16
(refill)
6
61/4
47/8
13/8
6
47/8
3 1/2
1 3/8
6
3 1/2
21/2
1
6
21/2
19/16
15/16
6.4
2 139
6
61/2
41/2
2
6
41/2
29/16
1 15/16
(refill)
6
61/8
-45/8
1 1/2
6
45/8
33/8
1 1/4
6
3 3/8
23/8
1
(refill)
6
63/4
53/16
19/16
6
53/16
4 1/8
1 1/16
6
41/8
3 1/4
7/8
6
3 1/4
23/16
1 1/16
5.6
3 40
6
61/2
413/16
111/16
6
413/16
3 11/16
1 1/8
6
3 11/16
25/8
1 1/16
(refill)
6
53/4
47/8
7/8
6
47/8
41/16
13/16
6
41/16
33/8
11/16
6
33/8
25/8
3/4
(refill)
6
61/4
55/8
7/8
6
5 5/8
47/8
3/4
8
Barker Residence
North Fork Road
,
Lot BB -10 - Section 22, T8S, R83W of the 6th P.M., Pitkin County, Colorado
Date of Percolation Test:
10/2/97
O� P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass
Village,
CO 81615
Office (970) 923.3289 Home & Fax (970) 923.2766
Nelson Environmen • Wastewater Solutions Ltd
E
W Property Address: North Fork Road
S Legal Description: Lots 1313-10, Located on a Tract of Land in S 1/2
NE 114 of Section 22, TBS. R83W
Property Owner:
Name Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Barker
Address 6000 Reinhardt Drive
Fairway, Kansas 66205
Phone (816)235-2132
Contractor: Excavating Contractor:
Name Tommy Stewart Name Not selected
Address P. O. Box 541057
Dallas. Texas 75354-1057
Phone (214) 357-0235(w) or (970) 927-3602 (local)
Saturation and Swelling
o Smeared surfaces removed X Yes
o Gravel Added X Yes _No(To a 3" Depth)
o Date and Time presoak water added
10/2/97 n 10:00 a.m.
o Amount of presoak water added
42 to 60 gallons per test hole on day of test
o Water remaining in holes after one to two hour presoak
periods?
Hole L _Yes X No
Hole 2: _ Yes X No
Hole 3 _Yes X No
Percolation Rate Measurement
Hole 1: 6 minuteslinch
Hole 2: 6 minutes/inch
Hole 3: 8 minuteslinch
AVERAGE 7 minutes/inch
Groundwater.
o Not Encountered to 11 I/2 ft.
o Estimated depth to high seasonal
water if not encountered- t30 feet
o Is area believed to be subject to
seasonal fluctuations which could
result in a seasonal water table?
_ Yes X No
Slope in absorption area
7% to the Northwest
Bedrock
o Not Encountered
o Estimated depth if not encountered -90 feet
o Type of bedrock:
X Sandstone Claystone
Siltstone _ Other:
X Fractured Weathered
o Is bedrock believed to be permeable'?
X Yes No
I certify that the above information is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge
and that all tests were performed in accordance with the provisions of Pitkin County
Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulation, Section 5-1 through 5-7 and under the
direct supervision of the reviewing Registered Professional
Reviewed by: ""°tai
a78
Robert F. Nelson a ammond, R.P.5:�'
President Schmueser, Gordon, M p
P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Office (970) 923.3289 Home & Fax (970) 923.2766
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5020 Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax 970 945-8454
July 17, 1997 Phone 970 945-7988
Connell Construction Company
Attn: Tommy Stewart
P.O. Box 541057
Dallas, Texas 75334-1957 Job No. 197 402
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Barker Residence, Lot
BB -10, Miller Nichols Subdivision, North Fork Road, Pitkin County,
Colorado
Dear Mr. Stewart:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for
design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with
our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Connell Construction Company
dated June 23, 1997. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the
proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this
report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a one story wood frame
structure with a small second story loft. Ground floor will be structural over an open
crawlspace. Pad footings and columns are proposed to support the residence. Cut
depths are expected to be about 4 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of
construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of
construction.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: The site was vacant at the time of our field work. The ground
surface is relatively flat to gently rolling with a slight to moderate slope down to the
northwest. There is about 30 to 40 feet of elevation difference across the lot. The
North Fork of the Frying Pan River borders the lot to the north. Vegetation consists of
evergreen trees with an understory of grass and weeds. Boulders up to 5 feet in
diameter were observed scattered about the site.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
observing an exploratory pit at the approximate location shown on Fig. 1. The log of
the pit is presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 11/2 feet of
topsoil and 11h feet of sandy silt and clay with cobbles and boulders consist of
relatively dense slightly silty sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders. Results of swell -
consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed sample of the clay,
presented on Fig. 3, indicate moderate to high compressibility under conditions of
loading and wetting. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the
a3
0 0
Connell Construction Company
July 17, 1997
Page 2
gravel (minus 5 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 3. No free
water was observed in the pit at the time of observation and the soils were slightly
moist to moist.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the pad
footings be placed on the undisturbed gravels designed for an allowable soil bearing
pressure of 3,000 psf for support of the proposed residence. Pad footings should have a
minimum width of 2 feet. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation
bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level
extended down to the undisturbed gravels. The pad footings should be provided with
adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of
footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area.
Retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an
equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for the on-site soils as backfill.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations should be avoided during
construction.
2) Column backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the fust 10 feet in pavement
and walkway areas.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of
all backfill.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pit excavated at the
location indicated on Fig. 1 and to the depth shown on Fig. 2, the proposed type of
construction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include extrapolation of the
subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pit and variations in the subsurface
conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions
encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report,
we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
H -P GEOTECH
Cg
Connell Construction Company
July 17, 1997
Page 3
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant
design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the
recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations
and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the
geotechnical engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
l�4:�11
Jordy 4. Ad$tnspn, Jr. P.E.
E. "I-1-araiYP. 6-
JZA/kw
attachments
29707
-7/Ig/q7 :''�`�
roA% ENG
cc: Maggert and Associates, Inc. - Attn: Barry Maggert
10
LOT BB - 11 I LOT 86 - 10
■
PIT 1
SSE EASEMENT
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1' = 46'
I197 402 I HE WOR NI PAKAK I LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PIT�Fig. 1 11 I
PIT 1
10
re
LEGEND: BOTTOM OF
PIT AT 13'
TOPSOIL; sandy silt, scattered gravel, cobbles and boulders, organics, medium dense, slightly
moist, dark brown.
F1CLAY AND SILT (CL—ML); slightly sandy to sandy, with cobbles and boulders, medium stiff
to stiff, slightly moist to moist.
° GRAVEL (GP—GM); sandy, slightly silty, with cobbles and boulders, dense to very dense, moist,
I r brown, rounded to subrounded rock.
Ip 2' Diameter hand driven liner sample.
i
Disturbed bulk sample.
_J
NOTES:
1. The exploratory pit was excavated prior to our site visit on June 24, 1997, with a backhoe.
2. Location of the exploratory pit was measured approximately by pacing from features shown
on the site plan provided_
3. Elevation of the exploratory pit was not measured and log of exploratory pit is drawn to depth.
4. The exploratory pit location should
0
considered accurate only to the
degree
implied by the method used.
WC=22.7
DD=76
on
the exploratory pit log represent
—200=66
m
and transitions may be gradual.
;o --
J.
6. No free water was encountered in
the
_J
on June 24, 1997.
Fluctuations in water level may occur
with time.
5
+4=67
y
.r —200=1
n
10
re
LEGEND: BOTTOM OF
PIT AT 13'
TOPSOIL; sandy silt, scattered gravel, cobbles and boulders, organics, medium dense, slightly
moist, dark brown.
F1CLAY AND SILT (CL—ML); slightly sandy to sandy, with cobbles and boulders, medium stiff
to stiff, slightly moist to moist.
° GRAVEL (GP—GM); sandy, slightly silty, with cobbles and boulders, dense to very dense, moist,
I r brown, rounded to subrounded rock.
Ip 2' Diameter hand driven liner sample.
i
Disturbed bulk sample.
_J
NOTES:
1. The exploratory pit was excavated prior to our site visit on June 24, 1997, with a backhoe.
2. Location of the exploratory pit was measured approximately by pacing from features shown
on the site plan provided_
3. Elevation of the exploratory pit was not measured and log of exploratory pit is drawn to depth.
4. The exploratory pit location should
be
considered accurate only to the
degree
implied by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown
on
the exploratory pit log represent
the approximate
boundaries between material types
and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in
the
pit at the time of our site visit
on June 24, 1997.
Fluctuations in water level may occur
with time.
7. Laboratory Testing REsults:
WC = Water Content ( % )
DD = Dry Density ( pcf )
+4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve
—200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
I197 402 I GEOTEECHNICAL. INCK I LOG OF EXPLORATORY PIT I Fig. 2
Moisture Content = 22.7 percent
Dry Density Weight = 76 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Clay
—200=66
From: pit 1 at 1.5 Feet
0
1
2
3
0 4
N
N
d
E 5
0
v
Compression
upon
6
wetting
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPUED PRESSURE — ksf
197 402
HEPWORTH — PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
Fig. 3
d
w
VT
c
I
Exitn� v
$UiLDIN& LOCATJON pLAt4
B�A-�
i�tiGU2E
0
$U,-gj-y6 �39 �M fTlMA.T
fe
•
al
rnn AV. CIU347/44U
0
eve 0278602
I
! � r
ALI 1- N
<
P --4A oar
,
1000741
SeP+,'c t'onk
_ ..... Kv*dwrr
rlxltlnw
iWIL Wife ,LT -ft PlJk4 �
E0d www1L 8661 CB'6R/ Uri 10Z ME : 'M 3QUW
(fvo0 ?r d Sc1 f' -f
7' frv" the h00_
CkAd i' from Ole.
5e}-b4JL 1,ne.
oryvtt� �a
-r („ eZ to n k 'I--
were—
I-
WCfN- MO'/e)
iv the. ro74,"1n,+i
of the i-ree i
5a[HO WM -:Vfiarnoo i ruj
A.0
Dive
W-�molpw
9Iz
` I
F�ovvsY
EX(STtl+te
BUILS�ih{6 ��TIvN p�N --
-
'Q-Ale1GE2 L.A81 A.�
3, t� Go 2E I
• � r' r> 7,�i�[p��t l 1✓ r
`�j// • r �///�•�� � � "y 1 ° r 4,;.'y x C I < >I t � 41Y� � Itrq r 1 r - to
�/ //��/�/T r t I ��S�StI' '" " f�, � }L� � t t�4"• r i;, ` \ J.�f /.i <I
•( l '� 0. e��% n y. N+4 1 i�V 1 iirN .l / ♦ f{ i +Z 11.. ,p('�
If
1Ycr.
n i. ,l � i tr .l 1 vk l��,r• fjf,�;•. � w `ly a 4'M1A t � '" ��[y� >
rtluek.t2T
1 •.�( f , v;"3.4`rklk tr<" + 1 d a ,,,4{Sstl` >; A &�/•; 6t E 1 S i f C5 �'t
. ,;�Njt f Is, ti' � ` sr ^* ♦ ,�'
., _u '� 1 f p'[ d -v7 k , !, �! ?•ilY4'! NGa ,li i'4 1 f i n+
It
>lllv
,` 1 t N 1 nom^"" �. R tr Xl N •r 'SY(11 yf <. ti;tSF n''� ;'>7 c� a [. tf {[
- ..: i t , • J O R T J'_',��, �-j,,�-`'°' ,,; , <. ,.,+ k f,��k IJ f v�• � �� �'ka �9.�. ♦ trl :�Q(R1��5 BEBA�l�1 tt ,r>
> 1' r f�Y ,•, s I , , r !(, , v � �R rr .9brA i
•.1 .. [. ✓, ,+','•.+ /r; � ae/ +K,e �.r��F`(1,113 1 , ~'f 7 4 j F4 s yy.".•'Q6! p f{�i f7 r ' v
yvk..
! 'mo i� ,pip i : 1 ` e I �•t `1t (L aifrl P /7 9K #^ r e'J v� r�'..• Nif hl,� t 4 i+ If 4
♦' /� ;y� � ` //�' . ,.♦ % I t i p,lPAl. r,�e� I ri 121"4 I ♦� f ,V 1;1 r,yi (: �`
rl / I �S ` l F • / I tr, + ( h*< p ^,'y1 l4' t'�"1 \[ ";-f t• nl( U 4 } S 1 7 1. r.
lit.
/ : 'E i. 1� � f. v k ` ? - 'e^' C' ,�nyte p+ A,- •, y \ y r r! xa � � r rt
J I (/ '- 't� / it 1 �., 1 v �l✓1 t,Y'r T,. +� T. 4'+ih� f 182+Jr, tr.jt t ,fl '}�C,�S Y[ y � h
' 1 � r •'Z6s l 1_ \M v � fJv>{♦Sj�Ty �' v �+�3 "�'' [.. [.r s '.{"' Y �1 'n 4- P'-.
f r tV Il. a34 1rs t, E'T•'Ik'`yd�bS Z1+ +_ir l"1•. 1 '1 i i)4 e y dj .
> I `♦ vl.'1 I. rT f tlSy .rye Kr fl a„� �" n rfs,si 1 [ n[ Ir+i
� 5 ' '� , ( ••' f t t' `7 i ,` , l..,Yi S�♦/ >.7�1e F- , I.P. V 1 y
< �Q r' f P . 7 ,d t t ti9 C� 41 `Jyy V t>' ? n� y ?' • fi r .
6".X
g „l f 14 'j% Il 1 1 I P p
lrJ
> ', t., [ n +,< Y S a r, ry a' 1 r 1 f
l,QARQ Cf [XWY(59QVFItS �. r •• rl y �[. I[ I .[v t'�" .. t" ' r f(q I., �P,y�♦ 4J . •�, <k r ..i' tr I 'M +� xkl d I
] 'I ' 1 F o f Z [� 1. If ��� � N i N Y n f ♦ 1 '+'a.. 1'
e 'ri Y `1 +� `+. Y l� s+ 1. d rt Tf. tilij� ly..�1r���ii��✓,4 4i �''. :!-i, /}�'tf�{%. "k"[ i f x .'
„y ` •' a 1 nU `�+ ',' Y Sft t11 9S
.' J A; yy> �1tA
� e��l ,♦ :[ { YF.h [ [ lv'r.1
NE719?(, r. ♦1'.11,'+%e•8si tib x.y SRv J+ ,ln Av11T A,1 rY�f Y
rAIr+6 Al RiE'.OYDSOE OR C�i .•♦ r'c.' It 1R' Crr r ,ti 1 ",J ..3 , l ♦,[•E 1 J4R , r /
1 ' , > ' ', .n♦ 3 1 /f t t '3 4>T+4 7 f t r
99,1 AV!a k r r �.lt f ro l.M 5• S`tr ' Y 1 t. 1 j s \ r• .
�rf/n>y �' P � jl� r'S .1' +iy>t �+^M1 SF \11r <i.J r � Jew yl n r♦f l r. b r , ��
'j PR 1"Q[,ISCO ♦ ih� . 1 [ .le eY F i1 Y �'f>�'f 4i y84 V x�.{:1 a �ST i; ,'l
' r� n J i g ��ff f1�1 YlY f C ,`•(t ��fY/��f 1 A A .1 % a♦ \ Tr ' "_♦
It
• �) , y / \ .I +• , > w,., r tpl Nin 7r /[t we t i ,f�ut ,.
tir ,. a{,� k ♦ / I ;i• [ F G ♦, I f / '1 ♦ h.. [ -'r c,'
• " •r to f C�' 9.1 f y T ' 1� r v)
• - 1 • , / � e, f 1 I [ n 't4 7 < 5ylvi 'r 1 S Y ' Y I i,fr � K r r` ,.:�, y 'r.:
QLD.
i0"�r M1p , t,.' n k'i ✓r4/af`M.r'+IJ }T e.: i ar� r,i rtf 'e 7 �,
V/L K I411I 5 t t t ren [ .L. r', Y L• e`j['.l fl R :I r,� n :fig ea 1
Yt r w' I ♦ 1 tr l
� �.. n O ? r , 4 � u .��1 fe r2• r X�.i1 f h S t ", ttY I r
`t 't v. � '. $ K 1 �f'f,i� $ 1� ♦ f'Y > W ,r ,a S" rki't.:i v 1 ar b r
" i > � I �.} N i[ /.r�^5 ^i lil r'¢6 hu?'[ d ! ! r �` yJ' u i �� f♦ t+11 , r1 �,
�.y++yx�'?�T ♦#,vL,lr.f,y;q.rf �e11f: i• ef' Ir 1ryl (r ;r f i
ya F i'Y. ep T �{ �� - ":a i 't•' r, I
�� r ,f • ' �s' ♦ � , J >I[ '1�''F+'.�fgg4'+'#I , l t t } � N 't , �,
(()) ''��♦ � f ` r } , y LV JS y. \ %y + Lrr i v r• ♦ t r 1
�.'7 I f e NLNt3QX4rE Ar 11 t" V• r v�esy�l.� i `D1� 1 �\ 790
1 d iii t 7 7
IMC I.jO 1r)r, + 5�\ 7(. pE'rd1'A r 1 iC[f' RxW"e1411OQ;�r�i`
' I- a ,. 'y 1 `C
p/4 P.: 1'ln v., r 1�/1�11 y1.�, _�• /I,YS, f lY<1 tll l:
N•'1 , 4 (`x'IJ as i! ..f•` -','--'"' I `tr "'1. f ',:4y1MT �Ytrn rl lF '"i'('1`O7" +f {3+Y.y fy kl ;I! 4 v Kr+1 �h3: r Ir '.•.i
1 e y T A 1..- �:, f } •�. ti,., �r Iry �.{'"i e [ *`�..f` M '. 1Y14iSk,tr s� +r ]. A / I r r Y y 1 `
6000 .RWFr +`Ef.WHi ,n�'�p J� • '1 a „r\'r� d ,'�'
"r , I h: S ..f i / I "� Y1 76 j :� fY i 5 b'�'1(iyb f'�,+1 •r',{ r� > s' i h l <♦ '' ��_+ ♦r [1 �` \. .
it
'. _ r ,I ;'• [ :i::[ tpdAr}g .! TYfr'l,d 7 [v rl 1'Pnr}q
A�t
4R. r r i t � �t ,� f e ftfi�[ .r NTi♦ lvKlk I / , 3 . ; ;
', - �'I$iIN(i.I 1 rI I :�. t 'ilf>yr.3't ra %♦Y �*�t fEn t.� f S nr t , r'wfr> e';'
y ,�_ '>>•t' ,i I T r ♦ i n, ! � � til y4 [ r` r n >y' ?at I + 5 rf ! ,rN
* ♦I Mr. 1 = i s at/ fy ;1I'yvir .ol,R�., f4 4`ar •i I �r "k T ir[ r '+ kr �i-
ti
,a !
1 A•` i `. IJP 4' 4.� !, , �t'y� r r:, f'q y,l r.I. y Ly, f' f Y f�' ��,
ZZ
Itot {
\LG,UR� Z
{^lov-07-97 04:12P CONN COMPANIES
.
i
how -03-97 I1i55A
21 *57 4953
i
i,MURL"06 PUIM Co. Inc.
P.O. sox 297 WATER SYSTIMS
GIENW000 SPRINas SALES. SERVICE i INSTMIAT10N
COLORADO P M2 $464M
October 30, 1997
i
Bruce barker
c/o Eldorado Eng.
1712 Main St.
xansas city, Mo. 64108
P.O1
`iD rJ pq�� i �1
'�F' `���I``�!!�r NOV 0 i 1991 I 1
LL��_
,
Attn; Mr. Darnell
On October 24, 1996 a well teat vs conducted oa a well
on the Barker property on the Korth Fork of the Frying Pan.
The following information was obtained;
Well bpeth------------- ---40'-0"
Casing size Itop)--------- 7"(steel)
standing water level ---------18'-1 1/2"
Drawdown P 18.75 qpm.--------
Production is qreaater than 19 Spm.
Thio teat wan conducted with the existing pump and related
equipment. The pump is a 1/2 hp. submersible Model 101.3. The
pump an related equipment is in proper working order at this
time. rhe well recovered back to 16'-1" in 2 min. If you have
any questions please call me Raun Samuelson at 970-945-6309.
sincerely;
Raun samuelson
I d 91801c919um a'Vi
P_02 J
i
Nov -10-97 05:20P GONNCOMPANIES 2157 4953 P_02
inyi-10-97 WIN 4,14 FK tL 'j, P-. rAA 11W. 'j vuw
Tc =
:.�y1s-l0-97 mom 2,05 el! iHELT01� D11111Hc CO PAX 10. 9709273W P. 1
li
T
I
4
,
!
WILL CONSTRUCTION AND YESY REPORT
STATE
OF COLORADO OfFIGE &THE STATE ENGWEER
WELL PERMIT NUMBER 170451
iter S : BNce limer
MsAoV Address : 0000 RalnharA Or.
City. S1 Zip: Fairway, KS tl62oa
Phone (913) 23&7367
�►rltOVAle Ovp„•e1<tl
iN NE 1/4 - 22 Twp_
096 Range 93W
OtSTANCFS FROM 6EC- LINES:
2000 A. from Scutt, Sao. tires. and 1 BW It. Goin
East Sea lirre. OR
13LIBDIVISION. MiMrMCI" LOT 8810 BLOCK
FILINC(l1NfT)
STREET ADDRESS AT WELL LOCATION
GROUND SURFACE LEVATION l I
r Lary
DATE COMPLETED 08/07/96 TOTAL Dram 40 R.
OVTH COMPLETED SO R
5. GEOLOGIC LOG : 1a.
HOLE 9M. ml
FROM IRI TOM
al ( a. Cater, and PO
D
0
Ro . Creva
306
N rare
as froohm
—
0.240
PERF. CASIWG : Scmen
Skil 81st
—
7. S"
m 1030
1 -
188 20 40
AM sock9.
Pact�r Pr.r�manl
Material:
Type
MTERLOCATED : 20• Sire:
Depth
Interval:
REMARKS: 10. dkdUTiRdim—CM-1
rY1W a.�ra
B dV Iwl.a, IWIaeM
-
cement 3 sits
1 gat 10-
An+.Used� 1 02.
MTM
IN i YD; GnoCA max IT Test Data s 61,111111111iid OIBMnenW 11oiin
12.
TESTING METHOD: Air C600tesaor
16 1L OetaRkne Measured : 00107190
Production Rale : 15 8pffL
Static Level '
Total 8. Datemirie measured : 0047M
Test Length : 2 hm.
Putrpn0 Leval :
Re(naike w ��w •sea
w
co a...ve�r+
3, ryrrw,m.rynw�rr�r+r�'r...,�rsr.)
Phone :(970) 9274182
: 8(uion DiI+9 Core.
CONTRACTORIto
id2l.
U41
S
1e WOW
Ale (PWTwo or )
Wayne Shelton I President
I:ILE C�Py
NOU 1 0 1997 ,
i
WELL LOCATION
INA TRACT OF LAND SITUATED
SECTION 22, T. B S , R 83 W. OF TZA
PITEN COUNTY, COLORADO
Av0*4*slTE
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: i INCH = 2000 FEET
NOTICE
ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY
DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN 3 YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN
NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE
THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
THAT TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED W BOOR 260 AT PAGE 379 OF
THE RECORDS OF PMIN COUNTY, COLORADO.
1 INCH = 20 FEET
l' A7
RECORD 119.11' ,'+
lk
w
000
Q O 00
uj
O 'i M
L` U a
_:_cn O
00
Lo 0
Q)
v1 Q)
Q)
C
E
Q
n
�
c
Q)
0
c_
0
`J
Q)
l_
V-
O
c
O
+l
cl
L_
U
(1)
N
O
C
cj
O
C
�
Q
U?
�
mi