Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.eh.247320100005 (2005)(Staff Cabin C-15)Document Layout (From Most Recent to Oldest Permit) Permit Application Log Sheet/Notes & Photos Communications As -built Design Engineer Design Soil Information Water Permit & Information Second System on property Third System.etc. Floor Plans Please See Building and Land Use Approvals Files for additional information. Pit�ounty Environmental Health Depart t Pe for an Individual Sewage Disposal Vem 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-5077 Permit # 05031 Parcel ID # 2473-201-00-005 Type of permit Addition/Remodel to I Name of Owner Connell Development Company — Diamond J Ranch Street Address 26604 Frying Pan Road Property legal description Size of lot 26.872 Total square footage of the house Water source Private well (pending non -community system approval) # of bedrooms in house 2 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house Caretaker unit Total square footage of the caretaker unit # of bedrooms in caretaker unit # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in caretaker unit Designed for what # rooms (list) 2 bedroom Permit information Designed by High Country Engineering Mailing Address 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101, Glenwood Springs 81601 Perc rate 20 mpi Profile hole depth 8 ft Depth to groundwater or bedrock 5 feet to groundwater Minimum Septic tank capacity 437 gallons Minimum Absorption area 191 sq ft w/ 50% reduction Comments Septic permit approved per compliance with the engineer design and specifications dated June 20, 2005. Any changes must be approved by this department and the design engineer prior to them being made. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the Pitkin County ISDS regulations. There must be at least 20 feet from the structure to the absorption field. There must also be at least 25 feet separation from the water lines to the absorption field. This system will consist of one 1000 gallon two compartment tank with an effluent filter on the outlet. The field will be distributed by manifold and have 3 rows of 8 Quick 4 gravelless chamber units for a total of 24 units. The chambers must be installed on the ground surface in order to maintain 4 feet of soil before encountering groundwater. Sand will be used to create a level area for the bed. Sand material must be installed in lifts to assure appropriate settling. This department does not endorse any brand of products. This permit must be kept on-site during installation. The engineer must do a final inspection of the installation and submit an as -built letter to this department. This department must also be called for an inspection with a minimum of 48 hours advanced notice. 'Revegetation over the area of the field is very important for the functioning of the system. Pitkin County has guidelines that must be followed to assure the plants that are introduced are appropriate for the conditions of the area. The use of native plants is strongly Permit approved by: ( I(i� l 0 0C_ lR . Date: ©5 Plans and specifications of the proposed individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -built drawings must be included with this permit before the final ap roval will beissued Installer j 1� �{ j t � `i:11 s) �p�(n+n �j `� t + r{k� Final approval: ! t ( 1,R Date: Pitkiounty Environmental Health Departm-nt Per or an Individual Sewage Disposal Sm 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10, Aspen, Colorado 611 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-5077 Permit # 05020 Parcel ID # 2473-201-00-005 Type of permit New Name of Owner Connell Street Address 26604 Property legal description Pan Road Addition/Remodel to I y — Diamond J Ranch Size of lot 26.872 Total square footage o e house Water source Private well (pendinq non -community system approv ) # of bedrooms in house 2 # of offices, lofts & similar size rooms in Caretaker unit Total square footagq of the caretaker uni # of bedrooms in caretaker unit # of offices, lofts & similar si d roc Designed for what # rooms (list) 2 bedroom Designed by Mailing Addn Perc rate Minimum Se Septic permit apE changes must be Minimum horizontal County ISDS regula be at least 25 feet s rVKf N�VrnnlA16(t5l0; 1 ermit Profile hole d ipacitV 437 >F -IF CV)&t per compliance with tho engineer ✓ed by this department nd the de nces between comp9hents of There must be at)6ast 25 fe ition front the watelf lines to th Prior to installation of the system, and 8 foot reconfirm depth to groundwater. The engine This department must be contacted to eval t system. This system will consist of one 109 field will have 20 QuickiA gravelless cham(aer ur undisturbed soil betweelri each trench. / to groundwater nimum Absou�t in caretaker App Needs confirmation � 191 so ft w/ 50% reduction ecifications dated March 16, 2005. Any prior to them being made. 'and physical features shall conform to the Pitkin structure to the absorption field. There must also 1 field. 5ffle h e must be dug in the area of the proposed field to / has #so added that the pert rates must be reconfirmed. fin ngs in the profile hole prior to installation of the n o compartment tank with an effluent filter on the outlet. The serial configuration. There must be at least 6 feet of This department does not endorse any brand products. This permit must be kept on-site during installation. The engineer must do'>ifinal inspection of th in and submit an as -built letter to this department. This department must also be called for an insp tion with a minimum of 48 hours advanced notice. 'Revegetation over the area of the field is very important for the functioning of the system. Pitkin County has guidelines that must be followed to assure the plants that are introduced are appropriate for the conditions of the area. The use of native plants is strongly Permit approved by: l �Q(CX A(T) C & Date: c 05 Plans and specifications of the proposed individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Installer: Final approval: Date: PITKIN CQ;INTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPA TMENT APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10, Aspen Colorado 81611 Phone (970) 920-5070 Fax (970) 920-5077 '��AAF t Name of OWNER Connell Development Company Owners Mailing Address P.O. Box 541057 City, State, zip Dallas, TX 75435-1057 Business Phone: (214) 357-4694 Home Phone: E-mail Address: the@connellcompanies.com Primary Contact Person (all communication regarding this permit will go through this person) Name Thomas H. Stewart Company Connell Development Company Contact Mailing Address P.O. Box 541057 City, State, Dallas, TX 75354-1057 Business Phone: (214) 357-4694 Cell Phone: Fax:(214) 357-4953 EtnailAddress: the@connellcom anies.co at 820-6160 or at www.pitkinassessor.o Building Permit # (if available) Street address of property 26604 Fry see attached Legal Description: Lot ,Block Size of lot: 26.872 acres. Total square feet of house Caretaker Unit: Attached ( <2ojD 2 4 7 3. 2 0 1 .0 0 Pan Road Meredith, CO 81642 ,Fling Subdivision Type of proposed structure: n/a Detached ( • of bedrooms (potential) in house 0 0 5 Permit is for New Home ( ) Repair due to failure ( ) RemodeVAddifion ( ) Emergency use ( ) Water. Private well ( X ) Spring ( ) Stream ( ) Community/Public Water System( ) If community system: Name of system The fee for a ISDS application is $600 for a permit that takes 6 hours or less for the department to approve. If approval takes longer than 6 hours, a rate of $100 per hour will be charged. The maximum fee is $1000. The basic fee of $600 is due at the time of application. The remainder, if any, will be due in two stages: first, at the time of issuance of the ISDS permit, second, before final approval of the ISDS permit. Application for an individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accurate information on locations of all existing and proposed wells, contour intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes, waterlines, springs, suction or irrigation lines, drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, floodplains, dry gulches, and existing septic systems. I hereby certify that any such features not shown on attached site map are not present. Issuance of the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may be undertaken until all approvals and permits have been obtained. The Pitkin County Environmental Health Departrne itkin unty and employees of these agencies will be held harmless should the individual sewage disposal system i r malfu on. The permit to construct is issued on information submitted by the applicant or his/her representatives. T ne a full responsibility in case of failure of the system. Signature of applicant Date OJ - Received by M Receipt # [I(n () Date J/?-IprJ 3 0 October 28, 2005 Thomas H. Stewart P.O. Box 541057 Dallas, TX 75354-1057 Re: Parcel ID #: 2473-201-00-005 Property Address: 26604 Frying Pan Road Permit Numbers: 05015, 05025, 05031, and 05032 Dear Mr. Stewart: 46 As per our correspondences to you on July 6 and 20, 2005 as well as September 5, 2005 (separately for each permit number), the Environmental Health & Natural Resources Department would like to remind you that we are still unable to complete the processing of the Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) permits for the above stated residence/property. It is mandatory that our office receives an "As Built" letter for each permit from the engineer who designed the system. The letter will confirm that they observed the installation of the system as designed. Any changes to the system must be noted in the letter or by a new set of plans. The Building Department will not issue a Certificate of Occupancy for this property until they are notified that the ISDS permit process is complete. This office must receive the "As Built' letters from the engineer no later than November 17, 2005. Please contact me with any questions. Thank you, in advance, for your help and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Alicia Gomez Administrative Assistant Environmental Health & Natural Resources cc: Jeff Odor, P.E., High Country Engineering 9 CIVIL ENGINEERING An EmployceOwnN Company November 28, 2005 Carla Block Pitkin County Environmental Health 0405 Castle Creek Rd, Suite 10 Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Diamond J Guest Ranch ISDS HCE Project Number 2041709.00 x 0218 Staff Cabin Dear Carla: 0 LAND SURVEYING The following letter is to confirm the engineer's acceptance of the installed septic system for the Staff cabin of the Diamond J Guest Ranch on Frying Pan Road (County Road 4). The design included a single separate individual sewage disposal system (ISDS). The septic tank, piping, cleanouts, and infiltrator units have been installed correctly. A record drawing is provided for the installed system. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please contact us. Sincerely, HIGH COUNTRY )�:(?ijN1E , INC. -0 975 oger . Neal, P. Pr ct er Mana................""C' g ss/NAL E� RDN/Imm Enclosure RECEIVED DEC 01 2005 r'T ,1 COUNTY E,,...., =NL HEALTH 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 14 Inverness Drive East, Suite F-120 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Englewood, CO 80112 970.945.8676 phone 303.925.0544 phone 970.945.2555 fax www.hccng.com 303.925.0547 fax JJun.24. 2005' 1:20PM HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING 91ttech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL June 23, 2005 No 1604 P. 2 Rmx; 154 (:Icnernxl S, I'Im . (.*.O:n.!.1, 61 (,Cl Phoru: 'r7P.Vg5.79rJt F" 1170 141, ,x154 nuwil: hR,'trM:yy;r. mtb ..an Tommy Stewart P.O. Box 541057 Dallas, Texas 75354-1057 Job No 104456-1 Subject: Percolation Testing, Proposed Septic Disposal System, Staff Cabitl, Diamond J Ranch, 26604 frying Pan Road, Pitkin County, Colorado. Mar Mr. Stewart: As requested by Tim Case, Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc., performed percolation ZX testing at the subject site. We previously cunducted a subsoil study and percolation a�) to ting at the Diamond J Ranch and presented our findings in a report dated October 20. \QJ 2004, Job No. 104 456-1. �Q' Q t A profile pit and three percolation test holes had been excavated by the client prior to our `js arrival. The subsoils exposed in the Profile Pit consisted of about 2 feet of topsoil overlying slightly clayey silty sandy gravel with cobbles and scattered boulders up to about 2 feet in size to the pit depth of 8 feet. Groundwater was observed in the pit at a \depth of 5 feet and the soils were moist to wet below groundwater Percolation test holes were dug and soaked by the client prior to our arrival. Percolation testing was conducted on June 16, 2005, by a representative of Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. The percolation test results are summarized on Table 1. The percolation tests indicated infiltration rates of 8 and 12 minutes per inch for P-1 kind P-2, respectively which were conducted in the gravel soils. An infiltration rate of -40 minutes per inch was determined from P-3 conducted in the topsoil. Based on the shallow groundwater, we recommend that the system be designed by a professional engineer. If you have any questions or need finther Fssistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HLPWORTH - Pi Jordy Z. Adamson Rev. by: DEH JZA/ksw attaclunents figure I — Location of Percolation l Table 1- Percolation Test Results cc: High Country Engineering— Atm: Jeff Odd Par eceired"TimelJun.24'c'2 32PM'pt'ngs 719.633-' al W1ra rob. jun -24. 2005 1:20PM HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING 0 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS No 1604 P. 3 P•B3iO3 JOB NO, 104 456-1 HOLE NO, I HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER CPTH AT START OF INTERVAL INCHES WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL INCHES DROP IN WATER LEVFL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-1 48 5 73A 6'/4— _ 13% 3'A Vx 12 Water added 63A 5V4 1 7 6�A A Water added 5'A 4% V3 6V'i 63/4 Q ii 444 4 V4 '6% 6% Va —J 4 3'/z /Z 6+/2 614 Ve 3 VA 23/4 1'h 6'A 6Vi A 40 Water added 6 5 1 Note: Percolation test holes were dug and soaked on by the client prior to our arrival. Percolation tests were conducted on June 16, 2004. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test. 5 4'A 44 — — -------.— -- 4'/4 33A +h 3V4 3 3A a P-2 52 5 7V2 7'h 7'A 7 7 6'/2 Vi 6'h 51A V4 BV4 SV4 +� 514 5 'A 5 41/2 Vz �7 4'h 4+A JA 41A 3V'4 +h _ 13% 3'A Vx 12 P-3 55 5 7'k 7 V4 7 6�A A ,67/h 6V'i 63/4 Q ii 6V'4 6rri 1/e '6% 6% Va —J 6Va 6V3- 6+/2 614 Ve 63/a _ 6'/4 ih _--i 6'A 6Vi A 40 p� Note: Percolation test holes were dug and soaked on by the client prior to our arrival. Percolation tests were conducted on June 16, 2004. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test. Received T me Li N 12:32PM — — -------.— -- TOTAL P.03 Jun -24 . 2005 9:28AM HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING • No. 1593 P. 2 CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING M miaow>w,aa c �.,, MEMORANDUM TO: CARLA BLOCK RECEIVED FROM: JEFF ODOR, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING JUN 2 4 2005 DATE: 6-24-05 PITKIN COUNTY SUBJECT: DIAMOND J GUEST RANCH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HCE PROJECT NO: 2041709,00 This memo is clarify the sand requirements for the ISDS mound system proposed for the staff cabin on the Diamond J Guest Ranch. The proposed ISDS is not designed as a sand filter system; therefore, the approved Pitkin County sand is not required. Installation of the sand bed below the infiltrators requires stripping the topsoil and vegetation prior to installing the sand. Concrete sand may be used for the sand bed. Installation requires the sand be installed in lifts of approximately 6 inches. Each lift shall be sufficiently wetted to "settle' the sand to minimize future settlement after the installation is complete. This wetting process may require the sand to be wetted to a point near saturation. If the contractor or owner prefers, Pitkin County approved sand can be installed to minimize the wetting process. If there are any questions regarding this issue please feel free to contact me. 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 101 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 970945-8876• PHONE 970945-2555 • FAX W W W.HCENG.COM 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST. SUITE F-120 ENGLEWOOD. CO 80112 303925-0544• PHONE 3039250547 -FAX PITKIN ENVIROMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMEO ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS Owner's Name Parcel ID # House Size (sq. ft.) (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 50 Number of Bedrooms in Main House Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow 200 State Review Required? no Perc Rate —(P) s, - 6 :;Lo Design Flow (Q) = # potential bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= _350\ Minimum tank capacity 437.5 gallons Absorption Area (=Q/5 X SQRT perc rate) A = 383.40579 sq. ft. of absorption area required 25 gravelless chamber units without reduction # of Perc Holes Required: 3 1 in every soil type? Spaced uniformly over UO ICK 4 9_8 A = 191.7029 sq.R. with 50% reductionTRENCHES 20 graveness chamber units with reduction STANDARD A = 191.7029 sq.ft with 50% reductionTRENCHES 12 graveness chamber units with reduction EO 36 12 EQ36 units in TRENCHES SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 100 SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet - 50 SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet — 25 I� VVtSt.cf. 0dazea7 a1� 2 ` 268. 30% reduction BED 29 ber units with reduc. 3Y sq ft 30% reduction BED 17 chamber units with reduc. 21 EQ36 units in a BED I tech G� �r'V Vl 1 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL January 21, 2005 Tommy Stewart P.O. Box 541057 Hepwoowlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970.945.7988 Fax: 970.945.8454 email: hpgeo®hpgeotech.com Dallas, Texas 75354-1057 Job No. 104 456-1 Subject: Clarification of Profile Pit Subsoils, Proposed Septic Disposal System, Diamond J Ranch, 26604 Frying Pan Road, Pitkin County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Stewart: As requested, we are providing clarification of the subsoils encountered in a profile pit previously excavated at the site. We previously performed percolation testing for design of a septic disposal system at the site and presented our findings in a report dated July 29, 2004, Job No. 104 456. The location of the profile pit and percolation test holes previously observed at the site is shown on Figure 1. We indicated that the subsoils exposed in the profile pit consisted of about 2 feet of topsoil overlying relatively dense, slightly clayey silty sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders to the pit depth of 7 feet. In our report we stated that we understood that the backhoe encountered refusal on the rocks at that depth. During a subsequent visit in October, 2004 for a subsoil study and percolation test for another cabin at the ranch, we observed that the profile pit shown on Figure 1, had been deepened to about 9 feet. The subsoils were similar to those previously observed and the pit did not encountered bedrock to the depth excavated. No free water was encountered in the pit to the depth excavated. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PAWI Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., Rev. by: DEH JZA/ksw attachment Figure 1— Location of Percolation Test Holes Parker 303-841-7119 0 Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthome 970-468-1989 EXISTING rSTABLE L � / EXISTING SHED n EXISTING / GARAGE -/ n EXISTING / RESIDENCE 26604 FRYING PAN ROAD i EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROFILE PIT P 1 Q Q P 3 Q P 2 PROPOSED BUILDING APPROXIMATE SCALE I" 30' I104 456 I GEOTVEORTH—P WLAK I LOCATION OF PERCOLATION TEST HOLES I Figure 1 [ 13 Gdtech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL July 29, 2004 Hep*Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County• Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970.945.7988 Fax: 970.945.8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Manuppella Enterprises, Inc. Attn: Scott Manuppella 15808 Black Ridge Road Paonia, Colorado 81428 Job No. 104 456 Subject: Percolation Testing, Proposed Septic Disposal System, Diamond J Ranch, 26604 Frying Pan Road, Pitkin County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Manuppella: As requested, Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc., performed percolation testing at the subject site. The testing was done in accordance with our agreement for professional services to Manuppella Enterprises, Inc., dated June 14, 2004. A profile pit and three percolation test holes were excavated by the client prior to our arrival at the locations shown on Figure 1. The subsoils exposed in the Profile Pit consisted of about 2 feet of topsoil overlying relatively dense, slightly clayey silty sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders to the pit depth of 7 feet. We understand that the backhoe encountered refusal on the rocks at that depth. Groundwater was observed in the pit at a depth of 6% feet. The upper soils were moist to very moist. Percolation test holes had been dug in the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and soaked with water by the client. Percolation testing was conducted on June 16, 2004 by a representative of Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. The percolation test results are summarized on Table 1. The percolation test results indicate an infiltration rate between 15 and 20 minutes per inch with an average of 18 minutes per inch. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the upper soils in the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. Due to the relatively shallow groundwater level, a mounded system may be needed. Pitkin County requires a professional engineer to design the septic disposal system. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P./t /!�Q 9707 Rev. by: SLP ot; W JZA/ksw attachments Figure 1 Loca Test Holes Table 1 Percolation s - esults 3 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 0 Silverthome 970-468-1989 EXISTING ^STABLE L � EXISTING SHED EXISTING / GARAGE -l/ n EXISTING / RESIDENCE / 26604 FRYING / PAN ROAD EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BUILDING APPROXIMATE SCALE 1"=30' 1104 456 I HEPWORTH—PAWLAK I LOCATION OF PERCOLATION TEST HOLES I Figure 1 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. J LJ PIT ■ P 1 Q A P 3 P 2 PROPOSED BUILDING APPROXIMATE SCALE 1"=30' 1104 456 I HEPWORTH—PAWLAK I LOCATION OF PERCOLATION TEST HOLES I Figure 1 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. J LJ HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 104 456 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL INCHES WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL INCHES DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-1 43 15 Water added 101/4 81/2 13/4 20 81/2 71/4 1 1/4 121/4 10 1/2 1 3/4 % 1/2 91/4 1 1/4 9 1/4 8 1 '/a 8 7 1 7 61/4 3/4 61/4 51/2 3/4 P-2 35 15 Water added 111h 9 21/2 20 9 71/2 1 1/2 10 3/4 9 1 3/4 9 73/4 1 1/4 73/4 63/4 1 63/4 6 3/4 6 51/4 3/4 51/4 41/2 3/a P-3 39 15 13 113/4 1 1/4 15 11 3/4 10 1/2 1 1/4 10 1h 91/2 1 91/2 81/4 1 1/4 81/4 63/4 1 1/2 6 3/4 53/4 1 5 3/4 43/4 1 4 3/4 33/4 1 Note: Percolation test holes were dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked by the client prior to our testing. Percolation tests were conducted on June 16, 2004. The average percolation rates were based on the last two readings of each test. 1S 9 10 E Sure, Z 1 Zoc)4 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION TWO CABINS AND ISDS DIAMOND J RANCH PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO CTL I THOMPSON u TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 ' SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 SITE EARTHWORK 3 FOUNDATIONS 4 FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS -ON -GRADE 5 BELOW -GRADE CONSTRUCTION 5 SURFACE DRAINAGE 5 PERCOLATION 5 LIMITATIONS g FIGURE 1 -VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2 -APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 -SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 4 -GRADATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 5 -TYPICAL FOUNDATION DRAIN DETAIL CONNELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY TWO CABINS & ISDS DIAMOND J RANCH CTL I T JOB NO. GS -4227 I� t 0 SCOPE 0 This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for two cabins ISDS proposed at the Diamond J Ranch in Pitkin County, Colorado. We conducted the investigation to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and provide foundation recommendations for the proposed construction. Our report was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience with similar conditions. This report includes a description of the subsurface conditions found in our exploratory borings, and presents our opinions and recommendations for design criteria for recommended foundations, floor systems, and geotechnical and construction criteria for details influenced by the subsoils. The recommendations contained in this report were developed based on our understanding of the planned construction. If plans will differ significantly from the descriptions contained herein, we should be informed so that we can check that our recommendations and design criteria are appropriate. A summary of our conclusions is presented below. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings forthe cabins consisted of about 0.5 feet of sandy clay "topsoil" and nil to 2.5 feet of sandy clay underlain by slightly silty gravel. 2. Water was measured at depths between 1 and 1.5 feet in our exploratory borings for the cabins. The water levels in the borings will likely be lower after spring snow melt conditions subside. We suggest that the ranch manager measure and record ground water levels in the borings on a weekly basis throughout June and July. 3. We recommend constructing the cabins on footing foundations supported by the undisturbed, native gravel soil or granular, structural fill. Design and construction criteria for footings are presented in the report. 4. Slab -on -grade floors should be placed on the native gravel or granular, structural fill. We judge potential for differential movementwill be low for slabs -on -grade designed and constructed as outlined in the report. CONNELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY TWO CABINS & ISDS DIAMOND J RANCH CTL I T JOB NO. GS4227 1 C 0 0 5. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of surface water away from the proposed cabins. SITE CONDITIONS Diamond J Ranch is approximately 2 miles southeast of Thomasville in Eagle County, Colorado (see Figure 1). Frying Pan Road provides access to the ranch entrance. Muckawanago Creek and the Frying Pan River trend across the ranch property. The property is on the comparatively gentle slopes adjacent to the creek and river. The limit of existing development is at the transition to the steep north . facing slopes of Cyclone Mountain. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The cabins will be one-story, buildings with slab -on -grade floors at the approximate locations shown on Figure 2. No below -grade areas are planned. Foundation loads are expected to vary between 1,000 and 2,000 pounds per lineal foot of foundation wall with maximum interior column loads of 20 kips. We anticipate maximum foundation excavation depths on the order of 4 to 6 feet deep. Individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS) will be installed adjacent to the cabins. If construction will differ significantly from the descriptions above, we should be informed so that we can adjust our recommendations and design criteria, if necessary. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions below the proposed cabins were investigated by drilling three exploratory. borings (TH-1 through TH-3). Approximate boring locations are shown on Figure 2. Drilling operations were directed by our field representative who logged the soils encountered in the borings and obtained samples. Samples obtained in the field were returned to our laboratory where typical samples of the soils were selected for testing. Graphic logs of the soils encountered in our exploratory borings are shown on Figure 3. CONNELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY TWO CABINS & ISDS DIAMOND J RANCH CTL I T JOB NO. GS4227 )9 2 IF 0 0 T Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings for the cabins consisted of about 0.5 feet of sandy clay "topsoil" and nil to 2.5 feet of sandy clay underlain by slightly silty gravel. Water was measured at depths between 1 and 1.5 feet in our exploratory borings. PVC pipe was placed in TH-1 and TH-2 to facilitate future measurement of ground water levels. Two samples of the native gravel selected for gradation testing contained 46 and 55 percent gravel, 44 and 36 percent sand, and 10 and 9 percent silt and clay size particles. Gradation test results are shown on Figure 4. SITE EARTHWORK Grading plans were not provided to us. Structural fill may be required to raise grades below the planned cabin footprints. Prior to placement of the structural fill, areas below the cabin should be stripped of vegetation, organic soils, native clay soil and debris. The on-site gravel soils free of organic matter, debris and rocks larger than 6 inches in diameter can be used as structural fill. The structural fill should be placed in thin, loose lifts of 10 inches thick or less, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 98 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Density and moisture content of structural fill should be checked by a representative of our firm during placement. Excavations in the overburden soils can be accomplished using conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment. Excavation sides will need to be sloped or braced to meet local, state and federal safety regulations. Temporary slopes deeper than 5 feet should be no steeper than 3/4 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type A soils, 1 to 1 in Type B soils, and 1.5 to 1 in Type C soils. Excavation below ground water would require excavation slopes flatter. Contractors should identify the soils encountered in the excavations and refer to OSHA standards to determine appropriate slopes. CONNELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 3 TWO CABINS B ISDS DIAMOND J RANCH CTL I T JOB NO. GS -0227 U Free ground water was measured at depths between 1 and 1.5 feet in our exploratory borings. Ground water at the site is affected by water levels in the Frying Pan River and creeks and run-off from snow melt. We do not know the degree to which each variable contributes to ground water. However, ground water levels vary with seasonal conditions and time of year. The water levels in the borings will likely be lower after spring snow melt conditions subside. We suggest that the ranch manager measure and record ground water levels in the borings on a weekly basis throughout June and July. FOUNDATIONS The cabins can be constructed on footing foundations supported by the undisturbed, native gravel soil. Clay soils should be removed from below the planned cabin footprints. Structural fill to replace clay soils or raise grades should be a granular material. Recommendations for structural fill were presented in the SITE EARTHWORK section. The completed foundation excavation should be inspected by a representative of our firm to confirm that the exposed subsoils are suitable for support of the footings as designed. We anticipate maximum total settlements of about 1 inch for footing foundations supported on the native gravel or granular structural fill. Recommended design and construction criteria for footings are presented below. 1. The footing foundations should be supported on the undisturbed, native gravel or granular, structural fill. Soils loosened during the excavation or forming process for the footings should be removed or the soils can be re -compacted prior to placing concrete. 2. Footings should be designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. 3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum dimensions of 24 inches by 24 inches. Larger sizes may be required, depending upon foundation loads. 4. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We CONNELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 4 TWO CABINS & ISDS DIAMOND J RANCH CTL I T JOB NO. GS4227 a+ 171 • recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance of at least 12 feet. Reinforcement should be designed by the structural engineer. 5. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at a depth of at least 48 inches below finished grades for frost protection. FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS -ON -GRADE Placing slab -on -grade floors directly on the natural clays will likely result in significant cracking of the slab. The natural clays should be removed from below the planned buildings and replaced with granular, structural fill. Slab -on -grade construction should be supported by the native gravel or densely compacted, structural fill. We judge floors constructed on the native gravel or structural fill will be subject to a low risk of differential movement and associated damage. Structural fill recommendations presented in the SITE EARTHWORK section should be followed. BELOW -GRADE CONSTRUCTION We understand that no below -grade areas are planned in the cabins. If below - grade areas will be constructed, we should be informed so that we can provide geotechnical input. Recommendations for lateral earth pressures and subsurface drainage will be required. SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface drainage is critical to the performance of building foundations and floor slabs. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the cabins are completed: 1. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the cabins should be sloped to drain away from the cabins in all directions. We recommend providing a slope of at least 6 inches in the first 5 feet around the buildings, where possible. CONNELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY TWO CABINS & ISDS DIAMOND J RANCH CTL I T JOB NO. GS4227 5 IF 0 0 2. Backfill around the exterior of foundation walls should be placed in maximum 10 inch thick loose lifts, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. 3. The cabins should be provided with roof gutters and downspouts. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be provided at all discharge points. 4. Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimize irrigation. Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of the foundation and should be directed away from the cabins. Irrigation should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to maintain vegetation; the application of additional water will increase the likelihood of slab and foundation movements PERCOLATION TESTING We directed drilling of two profile borings (Profile1 and Profile 2) and six percolation borings (P-1 through P-6) in the area of the planned individual sewage disposal system (ISDS). The approximate locations of the borings are shown on Figure 2. Graphic logs of the soils encountered in the borings are shown on Figure 3. Percolation tests could not be performed because of the presence of water near the ground surface. We understand that a professional engineer qualified in septic design will design the individual sewage disposal system (ISDS) for the project. LIMITATIONS Our exploratory borings were located to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by our borings will occur. We should observe the completed foundation excavation to confirm the soils are as anticipated from our exploratory borings and suitable for support of the footings as designed. CONNELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY TWO CABINS S ISDS DIAMOND J RANCH CTL I T JOB NO. GS4227 A U 0 0 Our report was based on conditions disclosed by our exploratory borings, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience. Criteria presented reflect our understanding of the proposed construction. If construction will differ significantly from the descriptions in the report, we should be informed so that we can check that our recommendations and design criteria are appropriate. This investigation was conducted in a manner consistentwith that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report or in the analysis of the influence of the subsoil conditions on the design of the structures, please call. CTL John , P.E. , Branch a . a�r2'f4� t� JM:cd (5 copies serf, �GMht CONNELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY TWO CABINS & ISDS DIAMOND J RANCH CTL I T JOB NO. GS4227 :)`1 VA 0 Li Cornu Cosntruction Company oiar.me J Ranch Job No. GS -4227 Vicinity Map Fig. 1 I 1� C<wmA conswction Company Dk mond J Hach Job No. GS -4227 Approximate Locations of Exploratory Borings Rg. 2 F 5 10 15 20 TH-1 34/1 16/1, TH-2 TH-3 22/1: 0 L West Cabin J L— East Cabin Profile 1 P-1 P-2 P-3 V V V v 30/12 LEGEND: ® Sandy gravel, clay "topsoil", scattered moist, brown. © Clay, sandy, soft to medium stiff, very moist to wet, brown. (CL) ® Gravel, slightly silty, occasional cobbles, dense to very dense, wet, brown. (GP—GM) Job No. GS -4227 North of West Cabin Indicates practical auger refusal. Drive sample. The symbol 34/12 indicates that 34 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive a 2.5 inch O.D. sampler 12 inches. v Indicates free ground water level measured on the day of drilling. SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS P-4 �J P-5 0 P-6 0 5 10 15 20 NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on May 6, 2004 with 4—inch diameter, solid—stem auger and an all—terrain drill rig. PVC pipe was placed in TH-1 and TH-2 to facilitate future measurement of ground water levels. 2. Locations and elevations of exploratory borings are approximate. 3. These exploratory borings are subject to the explanations, limitations and conclusions as contained in this report. T Fig. 3 9 Ll Sample Of GRAVEL, SLIGHTLY SILTY (GP -GM) GRAVEL 46 % SAND 44% From -1�H-1 AT 9 FEET SILT & CLAY 10 % LIQUID LIMIT - % PLASTICITY INDEX - % Amin' I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 NR 7W TWREAO91G5 U.S. STANDARD SERIES SQUARE AMIM, 45 WN. 15 WN. 80 MN. 10 WN. 4 WIN. I INK 700 900 '501070 96 "0 1 3v 3w 1w 31 616. r 0 00 .-_a.... ------ 10 . ... ....... .. .. ..... . . ........ .. ...... ...... ....... 20 80 ....... . . ..-.....-............_...-........-._...-_ ............. _.. - - - - - - - ' - . 30 70........_ .. . . .. ......... .. ....... .. =rz-..... ...... . OZE. 40 Sample Of GRAVEL, SLIGHTLY SILTY (GP -GM) GRAVEL 46 % SAND 44% From -1�H-1 AT 9 FEET SILT & CLAY 10 % LIQUID LIMIT - % PLASTICITY INDEX - % Sample Of GRAVEL, SLIGHTLY SILTY (GP -GM) GRAVEL 55 % SAND 36% From TH-2 AT 4 FEET SILT & CLAY 9 % LIQUID LIMIT - % PLASTICITY INDEX - % Gradation JOB NO. GS -L227 Test Results FIG. 4 I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 NR 7W TWREAO91G5 U.S. STANDARD SERIES SQUARE OPENINGS 45 WN. 15 WN. 80 MN. 10 WN. 4 WIN. I INK 700 900 '501070 96 "0 1 3v 3w 1w 31 616. r 0 00 .-_a.... ------ 10 . ... ....... .. .. ..... . . ........ .. ...... ...... ....... 20 80 ....... . . ..-.....-............_...-........-._...-_ ............. _.. - - - - - - - ' - . 30 70........_ .. . . .. ......... .. ....... .. =rz-..... ...... . OZE. 40 .......... .... . ........ . ... ....... . . .. . . .......... .. .......70 - -------- --- .. _.......-........y 20 ;01 01000 10 W----- . ...... ----- . - ....... M =I 002 .037 .074 A49 2 5W 1.19 2.0 2.30 4.76 9M 19A 36.1 ZDO 7&2 127S2 .009 .012 _ 0.43 I97 DIAMETER OF PART9 IN RNUJWETERS GRAVFL CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SLT VOON44-ASTP FINE MEDIUM I COARSE I FINE COARSE I COBBLES Sample Of GRAVEL, SLIGHTLY SILTY (GP -GM) GRAVEL 55 % SAND 36% From TH-2 AT 4 FEET SILT & CLAY 9 % LIQUID LIMIT - % PLASTICITY INDEX - % Gradation JOB NO. GS -L227 Test Results FIG. 4 • 0 15. STAFF ,.,_,, 4/l/2005 07/07/2003 16:07 970925 F,8 • ILL -01-2003 DO: IIAM FROM-DIVSWAT 9709458741 T -ITB WR1.5-Rrr. 76 COL. ADO D(VISION OF WATER RESOUR i ' 818 Centennial Bldg„ 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Application must be complete where I X) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER applicable. Type or ( 00 A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL print in BLACK FOR:( g)APERMIT TOINSTALL APUMP No overstrike: or erasures unless ( I REPLACEMENT FOR N0. mitia)ed. ( ) OTHER WATER COURT CASE N0, address NAME Bruce R. STREET 26604 Ming Pan Road CITY Meredith Colorado 81642 (swte) (zip) TELEPHONE NO. 927-3222 (2) County Pitltin Co. NE Y. of the NE X, Section 20 Twp. 8 S,9,9. 83 --A-, 6 P.M 1N. sl IE.WI (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA Proposed maximum pumping rate (gpm) 30 g � • Average annual amount of ground water 5 A.F�pr. to be appropriated (acre-feet): Number of acres to be irrigated: Nana Proposed total depth (feet): 130 Ft. Aquifer ground water is to be obtained from: Owner's well designation GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR; ( S) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigatlon (0) l ) DOMESTIC (1) t ) INDUSTRIAL 161 ( %) LIVESTOCK (2) 1 1 IRRIGATION (6) 1 XkCOMMERCIAL 01 ( 1 MUNICIPAL (B) I IOTHER PETA1L THE USE ON BACK IN (11) (4)RIS LLER Name ypLw,^i��.l TwA�79nA Street 5062 113 Road City rlanwnndpen---ryRl�l lbpadn 81l601 1 ule Telephone No, 945-5148 Lit, No. 697 PAGE 19/28 P.003/004 F -T52 RECEIVED -' AUG 0 5 '77 ITURESayRQU �� AA -Tr. COLO. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DO NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN Receipt No. ? V13 S / Basin Dist. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuanceof the permit does not assure the applicant tnat no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action." 1)'A DECREE FOR THIS APPROPRIATION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM TEE DISTRICT COURT IN ASID FOR WAT. DIV. NO. 5, STATE OF COLORADO, PRIOR TO TEE USE OF THIS WELL. THIS APPROVAL IS SU93ECT TO THE TERMS OF SAID DECREE. 2) A LITMIOGIC IOG OF MG WELL MPU BE FRE - P%= BY EITiRR A COMPETENT WATER WELL CONTRACT OR A Q)(tLIFIED GEOIOGIST. 3) Thr^. HWIM BATE OF TRIS WELL SHALL BE I M4I'F TO 30 GPM OR THE ACTUAL YTEID OF THE AQUIFER, WIiICnTER IS LESS. 4) TOTALIZING FIoW METER MUST SE INSTALLED ON T' WELL DISCMME WHEN THE WATER IS PUT TO 1IM- FICTAL USE. DIVERSION RDCORDS SMS L BE SMUTTi UPON REQUESTS TO THE DIVISION OF WATER RESO�� APPLICATION APPSIOV ED PERMIT NUMBER 22899— (4)DRILLER 28 J J — DATE ISSUED NOV1081977 EXPIRATION DATE N' OV 0 8 1(�917A .4 IS7A�N By �/ I.O. S — 3 COUNTY r. 07/07/2003 16:07 9709254668 PAGE 20/26 JUL-07-2003 090 1A11 FRO"IVSWATER6* 9T094SB741 • T-178 P.004/004 F-762 (5) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WELL and ft area on (6) THE WELL MUST 13E LOCATED BE10.57f .. pil the ureter Will be used must be indicated on the diagram below. by distances from section fines. > Use yw CENTER,SECTION (1 section. 640 acres) for the wtil location. 800 h from North sea. firm •_r.r'',.•; >•: ..' f .'^''� �; _ 200ft-from Fist see. fine i-/111I11-E.I3Q�OFRi'�'�*,'t 1 ,y " • = .',, - Mit «weal ti < -:? -: `+' '(" I 1:.+'. :•_aid+ :.LOT BLOCK FI r LING `;.:`i;',.. �y +.t'{' .•J�,.:,:; ,.:' ><. ...., - •'r .I'+.J�. f+'�i':W.d�.i��`•),�?,.!•. t d:: � ..: ,• '141.'+.i�,1 ( {.M1�`• • .I - SUBDIVISION i:. - -( wj'c . ,r .r•• Ji :9+� ' (7) TRACT ON_l�(tU4iwFl wl v. LOCATED 01m1u >3rnce R Rilev _ • '}- ' -,+.— - •.� •;Lyj ?.• No. of aaes,,,:2�.05 . Will this be •. - �� c « .':. • the only well on this tract? +. r7.'? ,~ +' • (8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM • •I'. .`.+r'":i'(%'M .•y �'�t at: •'•-i.{)• .f ;. c:�i:�`'.:'':. ,r.'elsin �^'t+.:..,y'�- a •' .,�.. , •t„ w:at, t' ' :tJ' •• C'(' s. Y r�• :' Of 1t 10 1� t+• : �? s�tr••.t l� <'Z br', : I. 'it "�•. �IlL tlf011�,� fLlpa��n. 1. ' µ: : "f' � .. ., I•' ' '� Perforated Caalrl9 ' ;' • ' •'„ ' • ,' .. . -. . �+Y;.i y.._ 15E"ONU .,: ,^; +• r..:, •.,-,', .TV.• v`q . ,: ii: il tr' y;�� 1.. z . 'I a } 4,.711 SOUTH . • •t-.. ::- S tt%.. • f r• 'W.. 'C. :' 1p 1. t•�e. �,. QTµ ..,� •, ; •d•Z,r I-•�• 'lam;:• 'lt�"#'f•...`�".s 1'1• r . � . ay . ,t?..• Ci4:. •.' <` CID M ft , �j,:i1�6uR••�•-1 R ,', 11 >/ r Jrt'• 4�i„i,. MT • • 'eI: ITOm ••' • (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELLSgWedistance • Y• • ..-. •, ... , c..'-: ; •.�;• : •... I and dwecti from old well slid ofrt for plugging ,t K» • ,>•.^-.l ,..L'b_•T•' - :',: Iiia t i� r; ^• .4: ":."a �T},'•, M.Y I.� .1 _Thr Peale of the diag'am is 2 irldles c`1flfl�N;Jr -• I ;:• `� ice:.:'' ' . ••-: '--: Each small square represents 00 sero.' .. , 'v'"•" WATER EOVIVALENTS T,%BLE(Aoundad :Flaufesl:; An #foot co•en t acre of land t tool dap • • r . t euhlcfoot per wo,nd Ids)..-, 419 04,1101141 per minvt0 19PmI , .. �•� " A lamlly of 5 wia }squire appro%Imateiy t ,c foot of tenter Per yar. : r t acrrfeot ... 43$60 wbic feet :.. 325,900 gallons.+. .. , _ • . 10Ws pM MMped tontlnuousry for one d4,y Produces 4L A2 w4, -feet. ` (gyp)JLND ON WHICH GBOUNn WATER WLLL�E__4SEDt Ownerls): $ttoe R. Ril M. No. of anew Legal description: NFrwa is $•20, TSSa $83W 6P.Me '(11) IDE LED. D�,$CRlPT14 l of the use of ground wster: Hatimhold ure and domestic yells riturt itdicet0 type.of disposal sytmm m be used. Cormaerolal Mgt ranch taith sixty (3 -)- months,• domestic for er a mentdLa; dispoaat'ByretQ= isaeptio tank &leach fieldt_ seven (7) oab x�H�O•e Numbers. tot (12) ntruFla WATER RSH75'used on this land, rndudins wells. Give Registration and Water Court Case or fi.....''•^,.. . • Description of land on which used: Type or a� .a; •. Used for (purpo3el Surface 'O Pr11e o dij � Qtoa>.a•ar�-- . 1131.E gPPLiCANT(S) STATE(S) .THAT THE INFORMATION SET. FORTH:HEREON IS ;� «�,:. or.q.ryrtl ��! -� `tq_�-�Y1I,..�-<.a, sa4�(.�v`��'t�"r'•"t,M1�r"�.�. Y ,T•'•-�t'.i�'f'-+4,v.0TRUETHE:BES"='h'�.v.Q.t;:'1.:=• •1•.' F3.� , ':y:t:.• `� S �V 's'`:r i! - :r':�.fii-"c. 4,(}.i'. i..4,' -CP. ;,�... ♦ k.,• }.' �':. r _ ... _. .ur>u•rrne'[u:. a'OILICANiQSI.:'. .u� i,_..t ene'rof� •�•.:�'�`NyI%G.: �s _ •. :: w.+<1 Si:.,., -. s.. r.S�c.. :.•4. !:. q(l7•.�!" - S� 7 ASPRJ • P[rraN Crn�n:r+rr Dn+anrwrr Dtene>�a I Connell Development Company - (printed owner's name) accept the responsibility for obtaining all soil information and other requirements of the Environmental Health Department that are necessary .to obtain an -Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) permit, and know that i -building permit will not be issued until the ISDS permit has beext issued. I recognize that I am submitting my application for a building permit without completing the necessary field work to obtain a permit to construct an ISDS.' I realize that I may incur additional expense in the form of plan check, energy code, and zoning review fees if changes 'to my original plan are. Accessary. I recognize that, by entering the building• permit application process in this fashion, I am taking a risk that might ultimately mean I cannot build on the property in question the dwelling might be smaller than originally designed, and that I.might have to submit an entirely new set of plans. I further accept the fact that by having to resubmit plans' it may cause extended delays'to• issuance of the permit to construct. This waiver'will not apply if the project has had a previous condition of approval by -Pi" County stating that an ISDS permit must be obtained prior to submitting plans to the Building Department_ If the applicant wants to -apply for the "Waiver" anyway, the applicant most request that the County change the condition of approval previously granted. Building permit plan review, energy code review, and zoning review fees are due at permit submittal and may not l efuntied. OWNER SIGNAT EMIUMMUMIX OWNER DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: DATE: (OPTIONAL) watcr.udiwa,v.dm `y Pxoae970.920S090 • Fw070.92U439 0J - AREA OF EXISTING DRIVEWAY ' PROPOSED 116' EXISTING SEPTIC\ „ "\ WATERLINE -'�" ( •''� \ZONE OF INFLUENCE % 7' _.-....-.. .----.,,, _.J ,..• --\.. xhr wz ., r RS i 00 v r-' EXISTING ca If / SHED I J1 � 111 EXISTING SEPTIC TANK TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED STORAGE r OFFSITE BASIN FLOWUNE 1. ABSORPTION LATERALS SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 -FEET IN LENGTH. 2. THE BOTTOM OF ABSORPTION BED SHALL BE LEVEL. 3. DRAINAGE SWALES ARE TO BE PROVIDED ABOVE AND AROUND TRENCHES, AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT SURFACE RUNOFF FROM ENTERING ABSORPTION AREA. 4. INSTALL INFILTRATORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. 5. NO EXCAVATION OF ABSORPTION FIELD IS TO BE DONE DURING WET WEATHER AND USE OF RUBBER TIRE VEHICLES OVER ABSORPTION AREA IS PROHIBITED 6. BOULDERS EXISTING WITHIN THE TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF ONSITE SELECT OR PIT -RUN MATERIAL. 7. EQUILATERAL DISTRIBUTION SHALL BE USED WITHIN ABSORPTION BED. EXISTING BASE OF ROPE TOW - EXISTING WELL EXISTING �. _ 1 LODGE \ \ EXISTING SAUNA BUILDING / . - �V NDER SEPARA ISDS j/ PROPANE- TAM % -' b D fI D A NIC.... -aro. 10 TO SETBACK ERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE W, � P PANE \ O ;FAN \ \ EXISTING WATER 4NE� EXISTING CO'IN 15 CLAN OUT 5' \4"0 PVC S ,WER QD\2% MIN XISTING SEP \ REMOVED 1\ 19' 4 0 PVC _ S�VER 0 2% MINS V 1000 GAULON SEPTIC TANK _ v-riY`•X� EXISTING BUILDING 17 UNDER SEPARATE ISDS 20' SETBACK FROM BUILDING r iNSPECIL4� WELL TYPPJ) / 47' 4"0 -SEWER 0 2% MIN - 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALLBE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PITKIN COUNTY REGULATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, EVEN THOUGH ALL SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH SPECIFIC DETAILS AS ARE REFERRED TO IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED REGULATIONS, 2. 2 BEDROOMS (SEASONAL USE CABIN) * 2 PERSONS/BEDROOM * 50 GALLONS/PERSON/DAY IS: 200 GPD = AVERAGE DAILY FLOW DESIGN FLOW = 1.75 * AVERAGE = 350 GPD (Q) Q* 1 DAY/24 HRS * 30 HRS = 438 GPD INSTALL ONE 1,000 -GALLON TANK WITH BAFFLE ***INSTALL 810 -FILTER IN SEPTIC TANK OUTLET*** A = Q .ii Q=MAXIMUM FLOW 5 t=PERCOLATION RATE = 20 min./in.* 350 r27 = 313 * AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE USED. PERCOLATION RATES OBTAINED ON BY TABLEII HP GEOTECH ON JUNE 16, 2005. USE QUICK 4 STANDARD CHAMBER INFILTRATOR UNITS IN BED CONFIGURATION: TABLE OF MINIMUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCES IN FEET BETWEEN COMPONENTS OF A SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 307 REDUCTION (31 3 SF * 0.70) 0 9.87 S.F./UNIT, INSTALLED AFTER NOVEMBER 15,1973 AND PERTNENT PHYSICAL FEATURES 23 UN17S REQUIRED. RECOMMEND 3 ROWS OF 8 UNITS. 3. CLEAN OUTS ARE REQUIRED AT ALL BENDS AND AT LEAST EVERY 100 FEET ALONG THE HOUSE SEWER. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL WATER TIGHT COMPONENTS, PRIOR TO THE ABSORPTION AREA, 5. TOPSOIL COVER MAY BE VARIED (WITH 1 FOOT MINIMUM) TO ALLOW LANDSCAPING. 6. INSTALL RISERS AS NECESSARY TO BRING ALL ACCESS POINTS TO WITHIN ONE-HALF FOOT OF FINAL GRADE, 7. LOCATIONS OF ALL COMPONENTS MAY BE VARIED AS NECESSARY AS LONG AS ALL MINIMUM DISTANCES AND SLOPES MEET THOSE REQUIRED. B. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM ABSORPTION FIELD AREA USING DRAINAGE SWALES AS NECESSARY. 9. SOILS AND PERCOLATION INFORMATION PROVIDED BY H.P GEOTECH, INC., JOB NO. 104 456, DATED JULY 29, 2004, AND JOB NO. 104 456-1 DATED OCTOBER 20, 2004, AND JOB N0. 104 456-1 DATED JUNE 23, 2005. 10. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ISDS PERMIT. PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY OFFICIALS. ENGINEER MUST OBSERVE CONSTRUCTED SYSTEM BEFORE BACKFILL 11. THIS SYSTEM IS SIZED FOR TYPICAL DOMESTIC WASTES ONLY. BACKWASH OR FLUSHING FLOWS FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS UNITS OR WATER SOFTENERS OR FILTERS SHOULD NOT BE INTRODUCED INTO THIS SYSTEM. 12. SITE PLAN INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT. NOTE: The minimum distances shown above shall be maintained between the system components and the physical features described. Where soil, geological or otherconrlftiore Spring, Potable Potable Dwelling Property Lines, Subsoil Drains, Lake, Water Dry Sepic 14. Wells, Water Water Occupied Piped or Lined IntermittteN Course,Irrigation Gulches Tark OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TIGHT PLUMBING FIXTURES, I E. HISSING TOILETS AND RUNNING WATER IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AND MAY OVERLOAD THE Suction Supply Supply Building Irrigation Ditch Irrigation Lateral Ditch or Stream 16 GH COUNTRY ENGINEERING RECOMMENDS CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS HIGH pipe. The area in which the pipe passes through the endcaps shall be sealed with an approved underground sealant compatible with the piping used. Lines Line Cistern 17, THE ISDS SHALL BE LOCATED MORE THAN 100' FROM EXISTING WELLS. registered Professional Engineer or Geologist that a mechanical or natural barrier will prevent contamination. 18. DESIGN OF SYSTEM BASED ON GROUNDWATER AT A DEPTH OF 4 FEET. (4) Encroachments may be permitted provided the water ar wastewattr conveyance pipe is encased as in (2) above, specified in [he fable. Dispersal System Utilizing (3) (4X2) M U)- } Cry) (3) 25 (3) 10 W Aerosol Methods 100 10 50 125 10 0 Ot� Z _v Seepage Pito,Sl.t Trench (3) (4)(2) t U) i� (3) (3) 100 50 25 20 25 10 50 25 6 Absorption Trench, Seepage (3) (4X2) (3) (3) Bed, Sand Filter, Sub -surface too 25 25 20 10 10 50 25 6 Dispersal System, or Drywell Unlined Sand Filter in Soil (4X2) With a Percolation Rate 100 25 25 IS 10 10 25 IS IG Slower than 60 Minutes per Inch Unlined or Partially Lined 25 IS IC Evapotranspiration System, 100 (4X2) 25 IS IO 10 Wastewater Pond, or Surface 25 Disposal System Other than Aerosol Lined Sand Filter 60 (4X2) 25 15 10 10 25 10 5 w Lined Evapotranspiration (4X2) 25 15 10 10 25 10 5 Field or Lined Wastewater 60 10 Pond Pit Privy or Vault Privy (4X2) 1 50 10 25 15 10 10 25 t0 - SepticTanks,Treatment (2) (4X2) (1) 50 10 -- Plants, Dosing Tanks, Vaults 50 10 25 5 10 10 BuildingSeweror (2)(4) (4X2) (4) (2X4) (4) (2X4) (2)(4) Effluent Lines 50 10 25 0 10 10 3. CLEAN OUTS ARE REQUIRED AT ALL BENDS AND AT LEAST EVERY 100 FEET ALONG THE HOUSE SEWER. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL WATER TIGHT COMPONENTS, PRIOR TO THE ABSORPTION AREA, 5. TOPSOIL COVER MAY BE VARIED (WITH 1 FOOT MINIMUM) TO ALLOW LANDSCAPING. 6. INSTALL RISERS AS NECESSARY TO BRING ALL ACCESS POINTS TO WITHIN ONE-HALF FOOT OF FINAL GRADE, 7. LOCATIONS OF ALL COMPONENTS MAY BE VARIED AS NECESSARY AS LONG AS ALL MINIMUM DISTANCES AND SLOPES MEET THOSE REQUIRED. B. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM ABSORPTION FIELD AREA USING DRAINAGE SWALES AS NECESSARY. 9. SOILS AND PERCOLATION INFORMATION PROVIDED BY H.P GEOTECH, INC., JOB NO. 104 456, DATED JULY 29, 2004, AND JOB NO. 104 456-1 DATED OCTOBER 20, 2004, AND JOB N0. 104 456-1 DATED JUNE 23, 2005. 10. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ISDS PERMIT. PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY OFFICIALS. ENGINEER MUST OBSERVE CONSTRUCTED SYSTEM BEFORE BACKFILL 11. THIS SYSTEM IS SIZED FOR TYPICAL DOMESTIC WASTES ONLY. BACKWASH OR FLUSHING FLOWS FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS UNITS OR WATER SOFTENERS OR FILTERS SHOULD NOT BE INTRODUCED INTO THIS SYSTEM. 12. SITE PLAN INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT. NOTE: The minimum distances shown above shall be maintained between the system components and the physical features described. Where soil, geological or otherconrlftiore 13. INSTALL BLUEBOARD INSULATION OVER SEWER PIPE WHEREVER DEPTH IS warrent, greater distances may be required by the local board of health or by the Water Quality Control Commission pursuant to C.R.S. 25-8-206 in accordance with the authority Q LESS THAN 5.0 FEET , prescribed by law and rules and regulations implemental of said section. Components which are not watertight should not extend into areas of the root system of nearby trees. For V U repair or upgrading of existing systems where the size of lot precludes adherence to these distances, repaired facility shall not be closer to water supply components III the 14. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONTACTED FOR SITE INSPECTION PRIOR TO existing facilities. Z BACKFILLING OF SYSTEM COMPONENTS. (1) Distance shown shall not apply to treatment plants or effluent lines where recycling is permitted. 15. THIS SYSTEM IS DESIGNED FOR TYPICAL DOMESTIC WASTES ONLY, HOME (2) Crossings or encroachments maybe permitted at the points m noted above provided that the water conveyance pipe is encased for a minimum distance ofam(10)fact U_ OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TIGHT PLUMBING FIXTURES, I E. HISSING TOILETS AND RUNNING WATER IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AND MAY OVERLOAD THE on each side of the crossing. A length of pipe shall be used with a minimum Schedule 40 rating ofsufTcienl diamelerm easily slide over and completely encase'he 0 o 0) i water conveyance. Ridged end caps of at least Schedule 40 rating must he glued or secured in a watertight fashion to the ends of the encasement pipe. A hole of IL SYSTEM. sufficient size to accommodate the pipe shall be drilled in the lowermost section of the ridged cap so that the conveyance pipe rests on the bottom of the encasement 16 GH COUNTRY ENGINEERING RECOMMENDS CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS HIGH pipe. The area in which the pipe passes through the endcaps shall be sealed with an approved underground sealant compatible with the piping used. W � EQUIVALENT. (3) Add 8 fact additional distance for each too gallons per day of design flow over 1000 gallons per day as specified in the table, unless it can be demonstrated by a 17, THE ISDS SHALL BE LOCATED MORE THAN 100' FROM EXISTING WELLS. registered Professional Engineer or Geologist that a mechanical or natural barrier will prevent contamination. 18. DESIGN OF SYSTEM BASED ON GROUNDWATER AT A DEPTH OF 4 FEET. (4) Encroachments may be permitted provided the water ar wastewattr conveyance pipe is encased as in (2) above, specified in [he fable. T% NK EXISTING WATERLINE PROPOSED SEPTIC INE OF INFLUENCE �l' - .. '•1 � LIGHT - PULE -- - ;OLATION TFCT_1 p:: ,` -------'--,r-0 -- _--- \ 1 EXISTIIAG WATERLINE J )- PIPING / 25' SETBACK EXISTING BARN FROM LEACH FIELD \ 50' SETBACK FROM LEACH FIELD REMOVABLE PVC CAP INSTALL MARKER IF CAP IS TO BE BURIED FINISH" 4" COUI 4" SEWER I 4" PVC SECTIONS 20 & 21, TOWNSHIP 6 S, RANGE 83 W. 6TH P.M. I VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1* 2000' GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. 1, THE ZONE OF INFLUENCE FOR THE EXISTING ISDS IS ESTABLISHED BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE EXISTING LODGE SEPTIC TANK IS AT FULL CAPACITY BUT NOT UNDER :D AT 1500 GALLONS. THIS CORRELATES TO A DESIGN FLOW 1200 GPM AND A SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 115 FT. BEND WCLEAN OUT ASSEMBLY SEWER CLEAN OUT DETAIL N.T.S. 4" 0 SOLID PIPE RIO'EGHENED COUI)LING. 0 12" '�\f O 1 :\�,. 0 36" REMOVABLE CAP /--4 - 1/2" VENT HOLES /� CUT HOLE IN TOP OF / INFILTRATOR UNIT FOR INSTALLATION OF INSPECTION WELL PIPE MIN. 1 4" 0 PERFORATED PIPE INSPECTION WELL DETAIL N.T.S. 6" MIN CUT NATURAL BACKFILL TO BOTTOM OF SAND GRADE 12" MIN. COVER 3H:1V SL4M�A TO DRAIN 36" MAX. COVER EXISTING GROUND PE R FLATTER 2H:1V O EXISTTIING GRADE ANDTO�RADEI.NEJLTd2ATOft UNIT / �//�/%//%Y/�%/\ "////%///\//% /��� //% //\ ..:: r•.,... / 2H: � SLOPE 6" MIN SAND BELOW INFILTRATOR NATURAL GROUND TYPICAL CROSS SECTION N.T.S. NOTE: LEPgTND ---- .. -- EXISTING MINOR TOPOGRAPHY -CJS-- -- EXISTING MAJOR TOPOGRAPHY 99.00 PROPOSED MINOR TOPOGRAPHY PROPOSED MAJOR TOPOGRAPHY I EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY EXISTING LEACHFIELD EDGE OF DRIVEWAY EXISTING CULVERT - ISDS SETBACK PROPERTY BOUNDARY +20 RECORD DRAWING NOVEMBER 28, 2005 1. THE PROPOSED ISDS IS NOT DESIGNED AS A SAND FILTER SYSTEM; THEREFORE, THE APPROVED PITKIN COUNTY SAND IS NOT REQUIRED, INSTALLATION OF THE SAND BED BELOW THE INFILTRATORS REQUIRES STRIPPING THE TOPSOIL AND VEGETATION PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE SAND. CONCRETE SAND MAY BE USED FOR THE SAND BED. INSTALLATION REQUIRES THE SAND BE INSTALLED IN LIFTS OF APPROXIMATELY 6 INCHES. EACH LIFT SHALL BE WETTED SUFFICIENTLY TO "SETTLE" THE SAND TO MINIMIZE FUTURE SETTLEMENT AFTER THE INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. THIS WETTING PROCESS MAY REQUIRE THE SAND TO BE WETTED TO A POINT NEAR SATURATION. IF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER PREFERS, PITKIN COUNTY APPROVED SAND MAY BE INSTALLED TO MINIMIZE THE WETTING PROCESS. I>: U Z z z g -Q00 0)0 °a 0) '0' z L A ZUNIZ Q r10 N _jX 00 Z jF TWO n Z 00 . U: I) U O Q Z 5 w O� N .. ,r O Q � ~ V U „~ vplan 0 _J O.. Z 9 Q ¢ a, Q� u} U_ oa W 0 o 0) i Z IL U , LL J W Z " M W � W �xoZ< M0 �W �. M U)- } Cry) n 01 FFYY [.. oz Z WWZ Z D tl r Wa Y Ot� Z _v V t U) i� uy SITE SECTIONS 20 & 21, TOWNSHIP 6 S, RANGE 83 W. 6TH P.M. I VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1* 2000' GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. 1, THE ZONE OF INFLUENCE FOR THE EXISTING ISDS IS ESTABLISHED BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE EXISTING LODGE SEPTIC TANK IS AT FULL CAPACITY BUT NOT UNDER :D AT 1500 GALLONS. THIS CORRELATES TO A DESIGN FLOW 1200 GPM AND A SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 115 FT. BEND WCLEAN OUT ASSEMBLY SEWER CLEAN OUT DETAIL N.T.S. 4" 0 SOLID PIPE RIO'EGHENED COUI)LING. 0 12" '�\f O 1 :\�,. 0 36" REMOVABLE CAP /--4 - 1/2" VENT HOLES /� CUT HOLE IN TOP OF / INFILTRATOR UNIT FOR INSTALLATION OF INSPECTION WELL PIPE MIN. 1 4" 0 PERFORATED PIPE INSPECTION WELL DETAIL N.T.S. 6" MIN CUT NATURAL BACKFILL TO BOTTOM OF SAND GRADE 12" MIN. COVER 3H:1V SL4M�A TO DRAIN 36" MAX. COVER EXISTING GROUND PE R FLATTER 2H:1V O EXISTTIING GRADE ANDTO�RADEI.NEJLTd2ATOft UNIT / �//�/%//%Y/�%/\ "////%///\//% /��� //% //\ ..:: r•.,... / 2H: � SLOPE 6" MIN SAND BELOW INFILTRATOR NATURAL GROUND TYPICAL CROSS SECTION N.T.S. NOTE: LEPgTND ---- .. -- EXISTING MINOR TOPOGRAPHY -CJS-- -- EXISTING MAJOR TOPOGRAPHY 99.00 PROPOSED MINOR TOPOGRAPHY PROPOSED MAJOR TOPOGRAPHY I EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY EXISTING LEACHFIELD EDGE OF DRIVEWAY EXISTING CULVERT - ISDS SETBACK PROPERTY BOUNDARY +20 RECORD DRAWING NOVEMBER 28, 2005 1. THE PROPOSED ISDS IS NOT DESIGNED AS A SAND FILTER SYSTEM; THEREFORE, THE APPROVED PITKIN COUNTY SAND IS NOT REQUIRED, INSTALLATION OF THE SAND BED BELOW THE INFILTRATORS REQUIRES STRIPPING THE TOPSOIL AND VEGETATION PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE SAND. CONCRETE SAND MAY BE USED FOR THE SAND BED. INSTALLATION REQUIRES THE SAND BE INSTALLED IN LIFTS OF APPROXIMATELY 6 INCHES. EACH LIFT SHALL BE WETTED SUFFICIENTLY TO "SETTLE" THE SAND TO MINIMIZE FUTURE SETTLEMENT AFTER THE INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. THIS WETTING PROCESS MAY REQUIRE THE SAND TO BE WETTED TO A POINT NEAR SATURATION. IF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER PREFERS, PITKIN COUNTY APPROVED SAND MAY BE INSTALLED TO MINIMIZE THE WETTING PROCESS. I>: U Z z z g -Q00 0)0 °a 0) '0' z L A ZUNIZ Q r10 N _jX 00 Z jF TWO n Z 00 . U: I) U O Q Z 5 w O� N .. ,r O Q � ~ V U „~ vplan 0 _J O.. Z 9 Q ¢ a, Q� u} U_ U N .. ,r O O W � ~ V U „~ vplan 0 _J O.. Z 9 to ¢ a, Q� u} Ln oa W 0 o 0) i U N .. ,r O O W � ~ V U „~ vplan 0 ui w �Ln Z Ix WN �01 d�V (A W � ZW 0N oa W 65 o 0) i Z IL U I" LL J W Z V W � W �xoZ< M0 �W �. M U)- } Cry) n 01 FFYY [.. oz Z WWZ Z D WGI" Wa Y Ot� Z -' m V u � U) i� 00 UN ZO N p0 nZ J J LL, :3 m W Z -1 U Iran O IL Q wz o� Z OL o� U PROJECT NO. 2041709.00 0218 ISDS C/] m6. FRYING PAN RIVER STEPHENSEN PR IERTY M GRAPHIC SCALE 60 0 30 60 120 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 60 ft. I I I I I / I I FRYING PAN RIVER I 1 I I I I I I - a ZONE OF INFLUENCE EXISTING OVERHEAD I I PROPOSE�LEACH FIELD /j3 �` / POWER LINE I I EPONn ., ...�• POWER POLE (TYP) I --- -7/' _ /''�� ZONE OF INFLUENCE OROCK EXISTING LEACH FIELD I I (116') / .� —� / I I L OF PROPOSED "'�- �OE I /LEACH FIELD #3 —TRENCH SYSTEMR116.00 XI � \ or IN SERIES _.--- '"" - � -_- POWER LINE�RHEAD . / � ,\ I 47t- 41 reg / • PROPOSED c --/,o -L '`PR OSED �� � -'--� �.I n,......_ - ��I �,, *. SEPTIC TANK 4 POND \ ...�IT C-IQ.NK#§ 20 S % 1000 GALLONS PROPOSED \ CORRAL ��/i / 1000 GQLLON� STI LE H IELp FROM B DING \� - ,, .—EXISTING SHED LEACH FIELD 2 ,AP. -'25- 0� - _ �� REL TRENCH SYSTEM IN OR REfIOVOC D MEETS MINIMUM SETBACK f ��- "•"- Ly � I � �" _" - _. � - �� „' REQUIREMENTS TO BUILDING _ AND SEPTIC TANK _ Y POND �. ,�� .-.� \' PROPOSED K SETBACK FROM rR2,- \ / �'� _-_. RELOCATE ROAD _ EPT NK #3 PROPERTY LINE TO AVOID i#T€RFERANCE \1500 GALLONS (10')�„ �� _ -,WITH PROPOSED ISDS - _ , r • �� R220.00 `—PROPOSED LEACH FIELD h/2 TREN;M SYSTEM IN SERIES --- —"' _ -- �� .�. CONC PAD RE I9(ME TS MINIMU SETBACK, = r REMENTS 10 BUILDJWP SHED EXISSTiNG`WATER i fir, ---- I' AND/$EPTIC K LINE •, ,,, �, �� EXISTING W'/TE/'RUNE I — � \c C2 JUNCTION OJ (TYP) ,fl EXISTING O BUILDING i STORAGE l f FROM BUILDING \-- — GA AGF, / IC N)6 V` PROPOSE v f-� c --SEPT TANK #2 i/ / W y ERISTIN, G, WATERLINE E STING ASPEN GRO BASE ROPE TOW _ � � EXISTING WELL MEETS MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIRMENTS TO SEPTIC TANK 50' \�� ,\ \ TO LEACHFIELD 100' BELL 17- , SETBACK FROM I \ PROPERTY LINE , \ (10') — PROPO ED / SEPTIC TANK 5 1000 GALLS f— b ^+ �'CO RAL Ak LEACH FIELD #4 J 20' SETBACK \ TRENCH SYSTEM Yr FROM BUILDING IN SERIES R100.00 ARN ,.,...... ZONE OF INFLUENCE LEACH FIELD #4 (100') U. S. FOREST SERVICE -- �.....,. 20' — LRQM j! V s �t00.OD XISTING LEACH FIELD-- �\ 1TQ.9E,-A9ANDONE ` v+ gf S PTIC TANK #7 J 1 000 GALLONS PROPO ED 6' SETBACK SEPTIC�TANK #111/ \ FROM SEPTIC TANK 1000 GRRLLON� PROPOSED / EXISTING WATERLII k LEACH FIELD #1 20' SETBACK JUNCTION BOX (TYP) ,'TENCHN SESTEM RIES FROM BUIL*G \ EXISTING WATERLINE __fL SETBACK FROM SEPTIC TANK 0-/240 41 z OF INFLUENCE FIELD #2 50' ISDS SETBACK FROM WATERCOURSE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEK CHANNEL TO BE VERIFIED ZONE OF INFLUENCE LEACH FIELD #1 \ (100') RELOCATE ROAD TO AVOID PROPOSED ISDS AND HOUSE ISETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE (10') lPROPERTY LINE NOTES: 1. OPTION A IS FOR FULL BUILD OUT. FULL BUILD OUT CONSISTS OF 2 NEW 3 BEDROOM HOUSES AND EXPANSION OF 3 ADDITIONAL BEDROOMS IN CABINS 6, 7, & 9. 2. AREA OF OVERLAP OF THE ZONE OF INFLUENCE FOR LEACH FIELD 1 AND 2 IS APPROXIMATELY 826 SF WITH A MAXIMUM OVERLAP DISTANCE OF 10 FT. 3. ALL EXISTING SEPTIC TANKS WILL BE REMOVED OR FILLED EXCEPT FOR THE TANK SERVING THE LODGE. THIS TANK WILL REMAIN IN SERVICE WITH CURRENT CONTRIBUTING FLOWS. 4. ALL EXISTING LEACH FIELDS WILL BE ABANDONED EXCEPT FOR THE LEACH FIELD SERVING THE LODGE, THIS LEACH FIELD WILL NOT BE DISTURBED, 5. THE SETBACK FOR THE EXISTING LODGE ISDS IS ESTABLISHED BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE EXISTING LODGE SEPTIC TANK IS AT FULL CAPACITY BUT NOT UNDER SIZED AT 1500 GALLONS. THIS CORRELATES TO A DESIGN FLOW OF 1200 GPM AND A SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 116 FT. 6. ALL WATERLINE CROSSINGS AND AREAS WHERE THE WATERLINE INFRINGES ON ISDS SETBACK REQUIREMENTS WILL BE SLEEVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PITKIN COUNTY AND COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH REGULATIONS. CABIN TANK RAINING ID EXISTING PROPOSED NO. BEDROOMS N0. BEDROOMS TO TANK CABIN 1 Cl 1 1 4 CABIN 2 C2 2 2 3 CABIN 3 C3 2 2 3 CABIN 4 C4 1 1 3 CABIN 5 RLC5 1 1 3 CABIN 6 C6 1 2 7 CABIN 7 C7 1 2 2 CABIN 8 C8 1 1 4 CABIN 9 C9 ---- CABIN 10 1 C10 2 2 2 CABIN 11 C11 2 2 7 CABIN 12 C12 1 1 2 CABIN 13 C13 2 2 2 CABIN 15 C15 2 2 5 LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE 7 3 BED HOUSE PRH1 0 3 1 3 BED HOUSE PRH2 0 3 1 6 SEPTIC TANK NO. BEDROOMS CONTRIBUTING REQUIRED TANK CAPACITY* TANK CAPACITY TANK #1 x 1 3 656 GAL 1000 GAL TANK #2 625 SF 1 9 1969 GAL 2000 GAL TANK #3 2 TANK 2 3, 4 6 1313 GAL 1500 GAL TANK #4 2 438 GAL 1000 GAL TANK 5 2 438 GAL 1000 GAL TANK 6** 3 1 984 GAL 1000 GAL TANK 7 4 875 GAL 1000 GAL TANK 8*** LODGE EXISTING 1500 GAL " EACH BEDROOM ACCOUNTS FOR 50 GPDPP, 2 PEOPLE PER BEDROOM INCLUDES 1.75 PEAK FACTOR AND 30 HR DETENTION '* SIZED PER RESIDENCE REQUIREMENTS, 75 GPDPP "•' EXISTING TANK WILL REMAIN IN SERVICE LEACH FIELD CONTRIBU NG SEPTIC TANK PERCOLATION RATE REQUIRED AREA OF LEACH FIELD NUMBERtINFLUENCE OF UNITSLEACH W x FIELD 1 TANK 1 7 26 MIN IN 625 SF 64LEACH ❑ Z Q FIELD 2 TANK 2 3, 4 18 MIN IN 1262 SF 128LEACH ❑ FIELD 3 TANK 18 MIN IN 334 SF 34LEACH O0. FIELD 4 TANK 5 30 MIN IN* 192 SF 20 ASSUMED PERCOLOATION RATE. BASED ON PERCOLATION TESTS WITHIN THE PROPERTY AND THE EXISTING FIELD AND THE EXISTING CONTRIBUTING TANK 1. REQUIRED AREA OF INFILTRATOR UNITS INCLUDES 50% REDUCTION FOR TRENCH SYSTEM 2. THE NUMBER OF INFITRATOR UNITS IS BASED ON QUICK 4 STANDARD INFILTRATORS WITH AN EFFECTIVE AREA OF 9.87 SF PER UNIT U O O 92050 3 lX N ZUNI Z mzo '�z M aUup N U O 01 O m m M m�Q N Z 1. N_ n V 00 to Z OD .. 1.r V U ,�j g h iA Ip V OIn ZLo Z N J NW 0AA^ M 00 T W mO Oh! F ul N� �q Ii. LL J V z to � :to x O wQ W I/ W O U N 1�y Z G Z <0 zwn'�. Wa � N V z� 00 Up Uz Z O W x a.Q ❑ Z Q o DU O a o�-�w ❑ !n O zY O(L O0. �� a. PROJECT PROJECT NO. 2041709.00 0913 2