The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.eh.264306200006 (1972)Document Layout (From Most Recent to Oldest Permit) Permit Application Log Sheet/Notes & Photos Communications. As -built Design Engineer Design Soil Information Water Permit & Information Second System on property Third System .etc. Floor Plans Please See Building and Land Use Approvals Files for additional information. PITKIN COUNTY DrEPf.RM.-L NT OF jI1 fIit0;1I,'—,.T AL VEAL -PH Box V AsPen Ci Cy :call. Aspz-n, Colorado . 92;-•2020 72003 System Location] �iiiQ� �a«.r<,,r___-----------_ ContractorQ„�{_�eGrxr 1. Construction approval__:_ Plans and location are hereby approved._`— _ _! Perc. rate inches in minutes:- / sq. feet of absorption area per bedroom. 02 Xsq. feet §q. feet r. i:::u i require - sq. ��CZ____-_�.----- ment. I Su: Jab Datef� -/S _2�? Inspector 2. Final approval of system: No system shall be dee.-,,--to be in compliance w-,Lh the Sewage Disposal Lairs un 'il the asse::,blc:d system is approved prior to covering any part.V 8" sepdmke tank cleanout—with-gas seal Proper materials and assembly Adequate absorption area Adequate concrete cover (dry wells only) Inspector *'IicLain r;ith p--wmi.L rocoritf: ra con truction sit-'.. l o� la COLORADO DEPARTMENT OREEALTH Water Pollution Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF LOCATION FOR SEPTIC TANK SYSTEMS D Applicant (Owner): 7 o4%N) W I m R� �� Mail Address: Pox �143� City: W*6-Ni ULQ Phone: 9 A. INFORMATION REGARDING PROJECT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW: Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, habitable buildings, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes. 1. Location of Facility: County Pj IN City or Town OLD S)JDWMp56 Legal Description Lot Size: t PIGej�__ 2. Type of area and facility - Number of persons served: Subdivision Motel Restaurant Trailer Court Other: DJPL.G.Y 3. Source of domestiq water: Public (name): 1 �� V��P' C-Ue,P- Private: Well _ Depth ? Other _ Depth to first ground water tablel$d 4. Is facility within boundaries of City or Sanitation District: NO If so name: leo P_1' " 5. Distance to nearest sewer system: 6 Have negotiations been attempted with owner to connect: If rejected, give reason: 6. Rate of absorption in test holes in minutes per inch of drop in water level after holes have been soaked for 24 hours: 7. Name, address and telephone of person who made soil absorption tests: 8. Name, address and telephone of person responsible for design of the system: (Pi2A�) STIiNiL/ DoD5o1J—SAurARy�cNG C�LkrJc�aoDZFR/KGs- It4G CA)L, CAQTXMSyCMM 9. Est. bid opening date: = -7;� yi J Est. Completion Date: L I`Est. Project Cost: i giyOO' Date: Signature of Owner a 3 B. SIGNATURES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS: The undersigned have reviewed the proposal for the location of the above-described septic tank system and RECOMMEND APPROVAL or DISAPPROVAL in the space provided below: DATE Comments: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL /--7 /--7 /— / / /-7 Signature for Local Health Department Signature for Mayor or City Manager Signature for County Commissioners Signature and Title C Note: The applicant must obtain the comments and signature of at least one of the above. C. FOLLOWING FOR STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE: Recommendations of the District Engineer D. ACTION BY THE COLORADO WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION: WP -10 (Rev. 5-70-100) • Mail ApPli ation County Sa f arian, Box V, Aspe-i. to: Cityf &.sne^. C:'-ty Hall COLORADO STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Water Pollution Control Commission $2-'.00 fee psi_' 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF LOCATION FOR SEPTIC TANK SYSTEMS Applicant (Owner): (90ic°bd�t/ 7.a1 Z&�4 .� Mail Address: /'O O./,'gi90Zy3a _ / City �(�/�pd�/CoLa Phone:9�j"y!l j A. INFORMATION REGARDING PROJECT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW: (Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, habitable buildings, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes.) O o 1. Location of Faci 1 i ty: County 1TAOJn) _City or Town Legal Description i{/C�G��_ —__—_ Lot size: Ap�, Xce 2. Type of area and facility - Number of persons to be served: ;Subdivision Motel Restaurant Trailer Court V Other: A/� --- — — ---- 3• Source of domestic water: Public(name): Private: Well Depth /pb Other Depth to First Ground Water Table—F 4. Js facility within boundaries of City or Sanitation District:— V S If so, name:_ /2 K2Z 7yf%7V------- T� 0 0 5• 'Distance to nearest sewer system: d �� Have negotiations been attempted with owner to connect: If rejected, give reason: 6. Rate of absorption in test holes in minutes per, inch of drop in water level after holes have been soaked for 24 hours: 7. Name, address E telephone of person who made soil absorption tests: 0 ii Name, address b telephone of person responsible for design of the system: R p,&x 24 aLir-zzz Est. bid opening date: S Completion date: Date: Signature of er Project Cost: S' Page 2 B. COMMENTS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SIGNATURES: Check one: F --j Mayor or City Manager County) 0 county Commissioners Comments: Health Department (City or gnature & Title Note: The applicant must obtain the comments and signature of at least one of the above. C. FOLLOWING FOR STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE: D. ACTION BY COLORADO WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION: WP-10(Rev.11-6R-100) • COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND SANITATION A C T I V I T Y R E P O R T Section Code 12 County FILE REFERENCE: Private Sewage Disposal - Malfunction INDIVIDUAL OR ESTABLISHMENT: Winagle Duplex ADDRESS: Roaring Fork River NARRATIVE: Conversation with Bob and owner I indicated to him that, upon receipt of a letter and proposal by Elmer Claycomb and Dave Bernett, I called Dick Bowman. Because of the complexity of the situation I want to have water pollution people involved in this. Dick was out of the office until Friday. The owner indicated the urgency of time. I told him I would get back with him as soon as I speak to Bowman. LETTER TO FOLLOW: ( ) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: DATE: cegt 2� , 19 - REPRESENTATIVE: J. Roark ES: 7 (Rev. 6-70-100) • COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTS DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND SANITATION A C T I V I T Y R E P O R T Section FILE REFERENCE: Private Sewage Disposal INDIVIDUAL OR Winagle Duplex ESTABLISHMENT: ADDRESS: Roaring Fork River NARRATIVE: Inspection with Dick Bowman and Dave Bernett Code 12 County We went to the Winagle site and spent an hour discussing the problem and looking the site over. As Bob has probably already indicated, the problem stems from a malfunctioning sewage disposal system serving the duplex unit, which is built between the road and the river down below the lower Woody Creek bridge. Effluent was surfacing at the northern end of the lot, running into the Roaring Fork River. Several problems are immediately evident: 1) lack of sufficient ground to adequately handle a conventional system due to the proximity of the river and the highway 2) the facility is served with a Cavitat 1250 gallon aerated system which does not appear to be in operation 3) excavation done by the owner indicated little or not existing leaching field 4) ground water is in evidence at about 4-4 1/2 feet and also evidence of bedrock has been shown. After much conversation and thought, the consensus of opinion between myself and Bowman, is that the best system under the circumstances would be to install a sand filter with underdrain to pick up the effluent through the filter, channel it into a wet well, and then pump the effluent into a leaching field that is built upon the surface of the ground so as to maintain the minimum of 4 feet of suitable of conform to the regulation. This will be based on the perc test which�mbevam will run. Also, as an additional safety factor, we will require that a seal along the river side of the leaching field be installed. There should be a trench dug at least 2 feet into the existing grade, bottom and side of the trench lined with 10 mil vynal liner and then backfilled with rock to keep any lateral movement of the water from occurring and running into the river. All the foregoing recommendations on the part of Bowman and I did not come immediately. We conversed the subject over lunch. LETTER TO FOLLOW: ( ) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: DATE: Spp+. P9_, 11-7-5— ES: 7 (Rev. 6-70-100) REPRESENTATIVE: Section FILE REFERENCE: • COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEAL* DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND SANITATION A C T I V I T Y R E P O R T Private Sewage Disposal INDIVIDUAL OR Dave Bernett, conference with ESTABLISHMENT: ADDRESS: Winagl9 - Woody Creek NARRATIVE: Code 12 County 57 Dave had gone to run the perc test and found that, instead of 10 minutes to the inch, it was 42 minutes to the inch. So I guess that puts us back to start the process over again. He said he had already talked to Bowman about that and wanted to know the thoughts I had on it. I told him we had better start at square one and design the system for 12 people, as the size of the house would dictate, especially in this recreation area. (Wherever there is an available bed through the winter season, it will be filled.) So, therefore, we need to regard the system accordingly. I asked for an additional tank to be placed behind the treatment plant in the neighborhood of 500 gallons so as to provide the required 30 hour detention. Then the leaching field is still to be built on the surface of the ground but is to be as large as possible --in the range of 2200 square feet or so. Dave called for Elmer to help, too. Elmer came in and agreed with me, therefore sending Bernett back to the drawing board. LETTER TO FOLLOW: ( ) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: DATE: October 3 lg 75 REPRESENTATIVE: F ES: 7 (Rev. 6-70-100) t -� • COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALS DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND SANITATION Section FILE REFERENCE: INDIVIDUAL OR ESTABLISHMENT: ADDRESS: NARRATIVE: A C T I V I T Y R E P O R T Private Sewage Disposal Winagle Woody Creek 12 Code County 57 I went to Gingery and Associates to talk to Dave Bernett and Elmer Claycomb about the Winagle problem. They indicated again that the problem stemmed from the fact that they used a certified improvement survey on which to draw their plans and the error apparently came from the location on the certified survey of the approximate location of the creek bank. One of the stipulations I had on the location of the system was that it stay at least 20 feet away from the high water line of the river. By doing this and by having the creek bank delineated on the drawing, it is somewhat different than what it is on the ground, it brought them up short in space required. I noticed a couple of other things during final inspection: 1. lack of cast iron pipe out of the two tanks 2. they need a manhole riser over the sump pump 3. the warning devices that need to go along with the sump pump I told Elmer that inasmuch as they are about a third of the square footage shy of the designed size of the leaching field, I am hesitant to give them approval, even though they have virtually no other place to go. I asked that an addendum be submitted to their design which addresses that fact and even possibly obtaining a letter from the new owner stating that he accepts the respon- sibility of the decreased size of the field, as it would relate to potential mal- function. I indicated I wanted to see the system again prior to backfill. LETTER TO FOLLOW: ( ) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: DATE October 17 , 19� REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Roark ES: 7 (Rev. 6-70-100) Section FILE REFERENCE: • COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTO DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND SANITATION 12 CT I V IT Y RE PORT Code County INDIVIDUAL / PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL INDIVIDUAL OR Winagle ESTABLISHMENT: ADDRESS: NARRATIVE: found: Woody Creek 57 I went to the Winagle property to do a final inspection and 1. the manhole riser has not yet been installed over the sump pump 2. the electrical equipment including the permanent line to the sump pump and the alarm mechanism have not yet been installed 3• the new Copeland tank was leaking. I want those problems taken care of and the letter from the new owners accepting the responsibilities of the system before I will give final approval. I did indicate that they could go ahead with the backfill of the leaching field, but it best not be done with a machine in fear of messing up the lines in the bed. LETTER TO FOLLOW: ( ) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: DATE: October 21 I(� ES: 7 (Rev. 6-70-L00) 19 75 . REPRESENTATIVE: E STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT C HEALTH 4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE DENVER, COLORADO 80220 • PHONE 388-6111 R. L. CL E E R E. M. D., M.P.H., DIRECTOR �CiaGla (� D -')5 X q o - acx:)o SQ r t O h `��5►11 F C� (P-P�\J jr-,L y