Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.eh.263901300968 (1987)Document Layout (From Most Recent to Oldest Permit) Permit Application Log Sheet/Notes & Photos Communications. As -built Design Engineer Design Soil Information Water Permit & Information Second System on property Third System .etc. Floor Plans Please See Building and Land Use Approvals Files for additional information. 0 Va4w 94u• D•e•rtm•nt of Aeneultun ' ►en•t MSI<• •. R.cere no. (1•]) ►, R.O. ae (3.d) e. Fonts (54) PERMITTEE ZQ �(74) 02 15 TERM SPECIAL USE PERMIT d. DI•hlo, .. u•« nu•tb., (9.17) 1. Kindel ... (13.15) Act of Manb d, 1913. as amended July 28. 1936. Sopris 03 5479 Resort 133 or Act of Marcb 30, 1968 0. SI.I. 116.17) h, Cwnry (18.20)_^ 4. Ce.d ne. 12U (R.I. FSM 2710) Acting Forest Supervisor c -FY CO 08 Pitkin 097 1 Permission is hereby granted to Dr. Rob Krakovitz/Rocky Mtn. Health Ranch of Meredith, CO 81642 hereinafter called the permittee, to use subject to the conditions set out below the following described lands or improvements for the period of 20 years�il�t@t� ending December 31, 2007. Two tracts of National Forest land in the W'S of Sec. 6, T.9S., R.82W., 6th P.M., as more specifically shown on the 1" = 400' map dated 11/87, by PB, attached to and made a part of this permit as Exhibit "A". This permit covers 43 acres and is issued for the purpose of: 1. Operation and maintenance of a recreation resort and related facilities including a lodge and cabins, holding pasture, corrals and barns, water system, sewer system, roads, parking areas and other appurtenant facilities. 2. Provide outdoor recreation opportunities on National Forest lands. 1. Construction or occupancy and use under this permit shall begin within N/.4 months, and construction, if any, shall be completed within N/A months, from the date of the permit. This use shall be actually exercised at least 180 days each year, unless otherwise authorized in writing. 2. In consideration for this use, the permittee shall pay to the Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agri- culture, the sum of Five Hundred Fifty-FivEDollars (S 555.00 ) for the period from January 1 19 88 , to December 31 1988 ,and thereafter annually on January 1 Five Hundred Fiftv-Five Dollars (S 555.00 )' Provided, however, That the charges for this use shall be readjusted as of, and effective on, the beginning of each 3 -year period from the due date of the first annual payment in order to Place the charges on a basis commensurate with the value of use authorized by this permit. See Clause 21. 3. This permit is accepted subject to the conditions set forth herein, and to conditions 19 to 55 attached hereto and made a Dart of this Dermir_ ROBERT J. MILLER (CONTINUED ON REVERSE) 2700.5 oinl NAME OF PERMITTEE SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED OFFICER DATE PERMITTEE Dr. Rob Krakovitz Rocky Mtn. Health Ranch TITLE /L �� 2. 7 _vim ISSUING NAME AND SIGNATURE TITLE •. J DATE OFFICER Acting Forest Supervisor c -FY ROBERT J. MILLER (CONTINUED ON REVERSE) 2700.5 oinl I PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PROJECT: �L)C \"\-r �_1 ITr. 4Zav,c _ APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: l��b KrmkD��r' REPRESENTATIVE' S PBONE: G 2 S = 3 -7 `1 FS q27.2-, �y R sPr, OWNERS NAME: 0 SFS rOf= S of U' C -e 1. Type of Application: U u 'kk 2. Describe action/type of devel A LnI hw., ( farad I G �e f rn 1-r Re.'i '%e Vj t being requested: 3. Areas in which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of reports requested: Policy Area/ kafg-r-r"&-1 Agent Comments LIc.b sLeI- 14Cc@ .. - y -' Mc. CA 0 � V,� E ;'�•i r 4. Review s: (P&Z 0 ly) (CC/BOCC Only) (PiZ then to CC/BOCC) 5. Public B aring: (YES) (NO) 6. Did you t applicant to submit list of ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS? ( S) (NO) Disclosure of Ownership: (YES) :(NO) 7. What fee' was plicant requested to submit: 8. Anticipated dat of submission: 9. COVIENTS/UNIQUE C CERNS: �% Ur!G I TO: INSPL%,rION REPORT NO. f Frasier & Gingery, far. roj, No, nate Project Owner Contractor Contractor Superintendent Subcontractor Subcontractor Superintendent Bather Conditions Temp ° at AM Temp ° at PM Inspection Period FORM 77 CONSULT/NG ENG/NEERS �& 818 GRAND AVENUE GLENWOODSPGS., COLO. 81601 TELEPHONE 303 945.5686 HOME OFF/CE k — 1840 SOUTH VAL L EJO STREET ENGLEWOOD• COLORADO 80110 TELEPHONE 303 761.4860 /J / Lam' : i a,v v' -A f --e- 0 1, �.� � � C.r'x S -� w[. ti • LIQ �� � .re f' `��s-i, n / L�tv.�t7 L r' 1C!' - /1 •� lr`�i•-t'^ i C' In.a[ .L 4-�.. r . _ .i.i..a �_AA -. —i . n e - , a 0,4� 6r FL 4/4sv y 31a h 5 Copies to: INSPECTOR +. REVIEWING ENGINEER 3 Sheet - of CIVIL ENGINEERING / LAND SURVEYING / STORM DRAINAGE / STRUCTURAL / TRANSPORTATION / WATER 6 SANITATION TO: ,n F INSPWON REPORT NO. FORM. 77 /Frasier & Gingery, /ne.. CONSULT/NG ENG/NEERS 818 GRAND AVENUE GLENWOOD SPGS., COLO. 81601 TELEPHONE 303 945-5686 i !Y HOME OFF/CE �7840 SOUTH VALLEJO STREET ENGLEWO00, COLORA00 80110 ELEPHONE 303 761.4860 C', ro j . No. l_3.4.c���i Date Project Owner RrA d Contractor / Contracto Superintendent Subcontractor Subcontractor Superintendent Bather Conditions Temp w 0 ° at 1;'3-) AM Ph Temp ° at PM inspection Period z:�o _ -0,,_... (Y"14;',,�- 4, n Iia -,"A 21 , LF CA /n�if! sal/y-• /rte -- 1 lA 1), s ik-He boo iii7 n k, A, < 4 Roo 1FxrAv.,IZ-,C+ 4e -i l Y --J Copies to: INSPECTOR �/Imc-✓' C l -i REVIEWING ENGINEER 5 Sheet of CIVIL ENGINEERING / LAND SURVEYING / STORM DRAINAGE / STRUCTURAL / TRANSPORTATION / WATER 8 SANITATION b . . • f Frasier & Gingery, /ne.. CONSULT/NG ENG/NEERS 818 GRAND AVENUE GLENWOOD SPGS, COLO. 81601 TELEPHONE 303 945-5686 HOME OFF/CE 1840 SOUTH VAL L EJO STREET ENGLEWOOD,, COLORADO 80110 TELEPHONE 303 761-4860 April 21, 1975 Mr. Jim Roark Pitkin County Department of Environmental Health P. 0. Box 1025 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch Sewage Disposal System Job No. 933.001 Dear Jim: This letter is in response to your letter of April 14, 1975, recommending certain revisions to the proposed sewage treatment system. It seems necessary to more fully explain our reasoning during the design process. Your recommendation that the inlet splitter box be eliminated would completely alter the design concept of the system. Due to the frequent periods of reduced occupancy, therefore reduced flow, we have tried to provide a system which can fluctuate with demand. The system as designed provides for adequate, yet economical, treatment of sewage under the wide range of conditions anticipated. For periods of sustained low flow, such as the beginning and end of each season, one plant can be closed off. This will permit more uniform sewage strength. For periods when the sewage flow exceeds the capacity of one plant, the second plant can be put on line with a minimum of trouble. The second major reason for the combined system is to provide a minimum level of service for short periods when an aeration unit malfunctions. All effluent can be routed through one plant while repairs are completed. The third reason for splitting the combined flow is to direct a more uniform sewage to each plant. The cabins would have only bathroom wastes, therefore being very dilute, while the lodge would have all food wastes. If, on the other hand, the inlet splitter box is eliminated, each system must function independently. Sewage strength and flow will vary directly with occupancy. It would furthermore be very difficult to rationally balance the two CIVIL ENGINEERING / LAND SURVEYING / STORM DRAINAGE / STRUCTURAL / TRANSPORTATION / WATER 8 SANITATION 0 Page Two Mr. Jim Roark April 21, 1975 0 system. The second major fallacy I foresee with the dual systems is that should one plant need repair, that system would receive no treatment whatsoever. The system has been designed with the inexperienced owner -operator in mind. There is only minor routine maintenance required for normal operation. This maintenance would consist of checking the control lights to ensure aerator operation, checking the trash rack and splitter box for accumulated material, and occasionally checking the grease trap. This does not seem excessively complex. To assure that the operator can tell which motors are operating, we have designed indicator lights on each motor circuit which are energized only when the motor is operating. With regard to Item 2, I do not feel that there is a more suitable location which can feasibly be utilized for the small leaching field. The area directly in front of the dining room represents the only other reasonable alternative. We, of course, looked at this possibility. Although the field would be slightly farther from the well, the natural ground elevations are such that the depth of the bed would far exceed the requirements of Pitkin County. Of secondary consideration is the disruption of the main entrance to the lodge. Further, we do not feel that the 115 foot separation from the well represents any potential hazard to the water supply. The anticipated soil conditions are such that lateral migration should be minimal. To further minimize any risk, we would be agreeable to installing a chlorinator in the outlet splitter box and providing sufficient contact time, if it is required by the State Health Department. Quite frankly, I am still very puzzled by your third comment. As I explained to you on April 7, when Bob Nelson of your office and I walked the site on September 25, 1974, we very specifically looked for the type of septic tank failure you mention. He seemed well satisfied that there were no cabins, other than those five on the hill above the lodge, for which the septic tank systems had failed. Particular attention was given to those cabins below the lodge. If, as you suggest, there is a septic tank system below the lodge which is obviously failing, Frasier & Gingery, Inc., will, of course, provide to Boots Adams the design for a replacement system. There is no desire or intent to ignore any septic tank system in non-compliance with applicable regulations. If such a system is located below the main lodge, however, this would not have affected and still would not affect the design we have q Page Three Mr. Jim Roark April 21, 1975 submitted. Due to the difference in elevation, a pump would be required to return any effluent to the presently designed unit. We would rather install a separate system for the cabin than pump back uphill to the central system. I hope this more satisfactorily explains our ideas concerning the proposed sewage treatment system for Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch. If you still have questions or desire additional information, please don't hesitate to call Elmer or me. Very truly yours, FRASIER & GINGERY, INC. C.0 David C. Burnett Design Engineer DCB/pm cc: Mr. Richard Bowman, District Engineer April 14, 1975 Dave Burnett Frasier and Gingery Box 1346 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Dear Mr. Burnett: This letter is regarding the proposed sewage disposal plans for the Horeshoe Bend Guest Ranch, located on the Frying Pan River in Pitkin County. After reviewing the plans for the sewage disposal system, the following recommendations are submitted for your consideration: (1) It is recommended that the inlet splitter box be eliminated, and the two plants plumbed so that each plant gets approximately one half of the flow. I feel this is necessary to avoid plugging or partial plugging of the incoming splitter box, which would cause perhaps a large portion of the sewage to flow into one plant. Also, it would eliminate additional routine maintenance chores of that splitter box. (2) Move the small leaching field to a point as far away from the well as possible. 115 feet does not appear to be adequate when the well is only 40 feet deep, and the percolation rate is 13 minutes to the inch. In conjunction with the forgoing, I think it reasonable to require a chlorinator for effluent from the sewage treatment plant. (3) As we discussed on the phone on April 7, there is a malfunctioning sewage disposal system for the cabin located directly below the lodge, to which no one has addressed repair. The system consists of a steel septic tank located 15 or 20 feet off of the northwest corner of the cabin, the effluent from which is running upon the surface of the ground, dust below the tank. This system must also be brought into compliance with the regulations. As you will note, I am forwarding a copy of this letter to Richard Bowman, District Engineer for the Water Quality Control Division, along with the plans, for his review and comment. Should you have any further question in this regard, do not hesitate to contact either Mr. Bowman or myself. James C. Roark, R.P.S. Pitkin County Sanitarian JCR:sgp cc: Richard Bowman, District Engineer Water Quality Control Division Colorado Department of Public Health I /U 0 • f Frasier & Gingery, /nc. ® CONSL/LT/NG ENG/NEE,9S 818 GRAND AVENUE GLENWOOD SPGS., COLO. 81601 TELEPHONE 303 945-5686 HOME OFF/CE ?840 SOUTH VALL ElO STREET ENGLEW000, COLORADO 80110 TELEPHONE 303 761-4860 March 31, 197 �,• F'L'q- , rah 179j5 Mr. J i m Roark SqP%TgRf N Pitkin County Sanitarian ,s 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 ;7 7 Re: Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch Sewage Disposal System Job No. 933.001 Dear Jim, The following report and sewage disposal system have been repared in accordance with the requirements of the Pitkin ounty Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations, effective rcn -L5, Backqround: In 1974, the Forest Service required that the existing disposal system be upgraded to comply with the requirements of Pitkin County Environmental Health Department. This requirement was to be made a part of a new use permit for public lands. The system must be capable of handling the effluent from the kitchen, lodge, and four cabins. It is anticipated that there will be an automatic washing machine. Percolation Tests: On October 10, 1974, personnel from this office conducted percolation tests in accordance with the requirements of Pitkin County and the Colorado Department of Health. These test holes were used in each of the anticipated field locations. The results of those tests were as follows: Field A: Test Hole #1 #2 #3 Field B: Test Hole #1: #2: #3: 6.7 min./in. 5.0 min./in. 5.0 min./in. 6.4 min./in. 12.3 min./in. 20.0 min./in. CIVIL ENGINEERING / LAND SURVEYING / STORM DRAINAGE / STRUCTURAL / TRANSPORTATION / WATER 6 SANITATION 0 0 Page Two Mr. Jim Roark March 31, 1975 For the purposes of field design calculations, rates of 5 minutes per inch and 12.9 minutes per inch for Fields A and B respectively were used. Inspection Hole: Inspection holes were dug in each field site to a depth of 8 feet in accordance with the Pitkin County regulations. The material was river alluvium gravel and silt with cobbles to 18" diameter. No bedrock or other impervious material was encountered. The hole remained dry. There was no indication of ground water ever existing at the bottom of the hole. Aerated Treatment System: Due to the rapid percolation rates, limited disposal area and the proximity of the Frying Pan River, an aerated treatment system was selected. The design loading for the treatment units has been calculated to be 4875 gallons per day based on a peak daily factor of 1.5 times the average daily flow of 3250 gallons per day. The unit called for in the specifications consists of two prefabricated 2500 gallon per day Cavitette plants situated in a parallel arrangement with a splitter box to direct flow to either or both units, depending on the needs of the system. Absorption Beds: The absorption beds have been designed to adequately dispose of the anticipated sewage effluent based on the perco- lation rates determined by test. The beds are to be constructed in accordance with applicable Pitkin County regulations. The total loading of 3250 gpd rather than the maximum flow of 4875 gpd has been used to calculate the required area. Pitkin County regulations permit a 20% reduction of the maximum flow where aerated treatment is utilized. It is felt that the fields can readily withstand temporary short term overloading which might result, and would quickly renew their absorptive capacity. Two beds have been designed with capacities of 925 gpd and 2325 gpd. Flow distribution to the two beds is by means of a splitter box utilizing proportional overflow weirs. Copies of the calculations for the bed designs are included as an appendix to this report. Page Three Mr. Jim Roark March 31, 1975 Conclusions: The sewage disposal system has been designed and can be constructed in accordance with the Pitkin County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations, effective March 25, 1974, using two aerated treatment units and absorption beds totalling 1741 square feet. The units and beds should be located as shown on the Plans, sheets 2 and 3 of 3. The aerated treatment units must be located a minimum of 10 feet from any potable water supply line and 10 feet from any dwelling or other occupied building. The dispersal fields must be located a minimum of 25 feet from any potable water supply and 20 feet from any dwelling or occupied building. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call us at 945-8676. DCB/pm Enc. /d Yours very truly, FRASIER & GINGERY, INC. Elmer L. Claycomb, P.E. Manager, Glenwood Springs Office David C. Burnett Design Engineer yo rst g"o $a 'd - GuQa� RHr�cQ 933.01 Oc.e,�..pq.�u,i • S� e1 ole �or �, eco Q. --— -- - .nB(EES`—_t(.oWc ow _So_�oeePle—x___3_►'',.�, _��da.y_� Lo yp.l/�w�ei.�+4/__ WS 1� - 'lows_tel s. -.7 q,p I a.o Add 4�, we -r -e- d corIAYvma,-c"A� S�I� Z_a /,a /_ %oAd;rq = 1-'3- -- Ili -- -- ---- - -- -. gal / d" 2.o /6. 15-0D. 14 v'f %Ole- --13,-Pjk,k , ¢s 7S- �pct- - _ 23. /b. $OD • •,-, � � 833.001 r 7 QG f t - s- � 'l' } r } moi- '� r ry..+t'py �•c t„ - �� _ y . � �� r , t_ = < �_ r ? �• -L � «< ' ^c'�.4 f '1-S i`�.fL ye�J:... y ' <rr . �J 11.%1 -o-. C)cc> �� • :i��h.2 .. �',* �`! > ..ice '«a.. '--� _ � ►�2 9 — t�4� A� � - J - CIS 325Qci — �sr> c = 2 3Ep V A @, 5.0-- - - ,� 2300•�� ;; 5 v Seo 1051- • ;- V alZ� -W-Q- 410 t� 232.5 d� A _ 1040 A 4 tom ��ft• �� Q 9.23 �•Z.9 L _ . r- P GingeryAss•"aces, /ne. CONS'UT To'VG ENviNEE I+.S 818 GRAND AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 t,LyEL EPHONE 303 945-8676 tilc�E- (� 1 UTHVAIVA(L£l0 STREET o E O. CO(ORADO 80110 )� ELI NE 303 761-4860 June 9, 1975 Mr. Richard Bowman District Engineer Water Quality Control Division Colorado Department of Public Health P. 0. Box 1687 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 ar52Shoe-r1C1 DERK W. GINGERY ELMER L. CLAYCOMB LARRYA MULLER RICHARD L. HUSMANN FRED R LAMUTT, 1R Re: Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch Sewage Treatment System Job No. 933.002 Dear Dick: On Friday, June 6, 1975, I made a final inspection of the sewage disposal facilities for Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranchi A copy of the inspection report, together with two P61oroid photos of the inlet splitter box are enclosed. All construction completed is in accordance with the plans and specifications as originally prepared or as revised to meet your requirements. The inlet splitter box is functioning very well, providing a very even split to the two plants. The operation of the outlet splitter box could not be observed, as the weir plates had not been installed. This is noted on the check list on the inspection report. The material encountered in the botton of the infiltration beds was uniformly fine sand with cobbles. This material should function very well as a filter media. The beds were constructed with more gravel than required by the specifi- cations. A 4" diameter perforated pipe inspection well has been left in the smaller bed. We will furnish a start up, shut down procedure sheet to the new owner and be sure that Dodson Engineered Products supplies all available information. The new owner of Horse- shoe Bend is an industrial engineer by training, and is very interested in proper operation of the plant. Please contact me if you have any questions. /(0 cc: Jim Roark ✓ CIVIL ENGINEERING I LAND SURVEYING I STORM DRAINAGE Very truly yours, GINGERY ASSOC, INC. 4 �� 'T" 04&W/, Elmer L. Clayc mb, P. E. TRANSPORTATION If WATER 8 SANITATION I COMPUTER SERVICES OLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH • DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND SANITATION ACT I V I T Y RE PORT Code Section FILE REFERENCE: p»hlir RawagP Digposgi INDIVIDUAL OR ESTABLISHMENT: TT�r,eghoe Read GUPSt Ranob ADDRESS: NARRATIVE: County 57 I spoke to Dick Bowman about the Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch and Elmer ClayUmb's claim that we have no jurisdiction on systems of over 2000 gallons. That is apparently the way the law reads. Further, the system has been covered, leaving only a couple of inspection holes, which I feel are not adequate. I told him we needed to make a final inspection. Dick Bowman said that State Water Quality Control is responsible for systems of over 2000 3allons per day, and they do not require a final inspection. Rather, they only require the submittal of a letter of certification stating that the system was installed according to their design. Bowman does not agree with that position and intends to pursue it further in his own department. He had indicated that in the future, as a condition of the site location approval, final inspection must be made by the local health',or himself. LETTER TO FOLLOW: ( ) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: 0 DATE: 6/6 , 19-75--. REPRESENTATIVE: Roark ES: 7 (Rev. 6-70-100) J OOLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH • DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND SANITATION ACT I V I T Y RE PORT Code 12 Section County 57 FILE REFERENCE: Public Sewage Disposal INDIVIDUAL OR ESTABLISHMENT: Horshoe Bend Guest Ranch ADDRESS: Meredith NARRATIVE: I visited the Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch with Dick Bowman. I took pictures of the malfunctioning system. We discussed the various problems thatparisen. We met Dave Burnett on the site. He has seen fit to re -design the splitter box and some of the main service lines. They are bringing the waste from the lodge into a manhole and the wastes from the other cabins through two other manholes, joining them into the first manhole. They'll be mixing both effluent lines in the manhole some 15 feet from the splitter box. The splitter box has been re -designed so it will be five feet long. The flow will come into one end of the box, make a tight curve, and then sweep down a pre -formed channel to be split at the opposite end and run into each of the two 2500 gallon Cavitette tanks. We then looked into the leaching fields, and found that no profile test hole had been dug. Apparently there was some misunder- standing about using the exposed cut for the parking lot in the side of the hill beside the lodge. I said that didn't identify any potential ground water in the area of the leaching field. They dug us a hole and found after about 2 feet of soil and rock, the strata was sand. Finding that sand to a depth of 8 or 9 feet, Bowman felt there would be very little potential of contamination of the well. I would prefer to see the perc rate somewhat slower, but we don't have anything to indicate that there would be a flow of groundwater from the area of the sewage disposal system towards the well. Frasier and Gingery have submitted a letter to Dick in which they state they feel, due to the evidence at hand, there would be very little possibility of contamination of that well. I met the new owner, who will take possession in a couple of days. Most of the installations have been completed except for the installation of the two Cavitette systems and the leaching fields. All the manholes and main service have already been installed. LETTER TO FOLLOW: ( ) OTHER DATE: 5ipn , 19_Z.,i_. REPRESENTATIVE- S: 7 (Rev. 6-70-100) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH • DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND SANITATION ACT I V I T Y RE PORT Code Section FILE REFERENCE: Public Sewage Disposal 12 County 57 INDIVIDUAL OR ESTABLISHMENT: Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch ADDRESS: Frying Pan NARRATIVE: I talked to Dick Bowman about the sewage disposal system for Horseshoe Bend. We discussed the designed splitter box, and my recomendations for no splitter box. He did not like their splitter box either, add we're requesting that they join the two different service lines 15 or 20 feet ahead of the treatment plant so they could be well mixed. Then, through some kind of a distribution box, have the sewage spread in a different manner than what Dave Burnett was calling for. We then discussed the potential problems of water pollution with their well, with the disposal field being 115 feet from the well. We finally agreed that a site location inspection was in order. It is tentatively planned for Tuesday of next week. LETTER TO FOLLOW: ( ) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: DATE: 5.412 , 194-5—. REPRESENTATIVE: ES: 7 (Rev. 6-70-100) C. Roark COLORADO STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF SANITATION Code 12 Section ACTIVITY REPORT County 57 FILE REFERENCE: INDIVIDUAL OR ESTABLISHMENT: Norpshoe Bend Guest Ran h ADDRESS: F ,; a Pnn Greg Misbach and I went to Horeseshoe Bend Guest Ranth. No one was there. The cabin that is lowest on the hill towards the lake has a malfunctioning system. The septic tank cover is right at ground level, and I could see where the effluent has spilled over. This is apparently below the bench where they intend to install the sewage disposal system. There has been no construction of a system there as yet. We found the next cabin (the first to the right of the lodge looking towards the lake) also has an unapproved sewage disposal system. LETTER TO FOLLOW: k) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: DATE: 11/12 19 74 REPRESENTA ES: 7 (8-53-50) Section . # 10 COLORADO STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF SANITATION Code ACTIVITY REPORT FILE REFERENCE: pi hl • r 4a.+ gA nsgpLa1 INDIVIDUAL OR ESTABLISHMENT: An spshnP Rpna( act R n h ADDRESS: Mprp rl i +h NARRATIVE: County, We found three pipes daylighting on the hillside. One was from two cabins that goes into a badly corroded septic tank that is exposed 3"or 4 " out of the surface of the ground. One comes from a small cabin directly in front of the driveway, and daylights out of a small cinder block septic tank about 3' up on the tank. Another daylights 30-40' behind the lodge and seems to carry some Of all of the waste from the septic tank behind the lodge down the hillside. The 4 cabins on a lower level appeared to have systems that were functioning adequately. It was indicated that these systems were approximately 8 years old, that each was a 500 gallon tank, and each had a leach field. He didn't know how big the leach fields were. My suggestion, considering the down time and possible power failures, would be a large septic tank, about 3,000 gallons, tying in the 4 cabins above the lodge, and the lodge itself; and using an area about 30xl20 to fit in a leach field. This particular area has already been percolated once. I tested it at 3 1/2 minutes to the inch, but was informed today that it was only 2 hours of pre-soak. Boots Adams indicated that he soaked them longer and came up with a rate of 6-7 minutes to the inch. This being the case, it may be possible to handle the effluent in a field in one general vicinity. The field will, in all probability have to be 3 1/2' to 4' deep to accomodate all the sewer lines on grade. LETTER TO FOLLOW: ( ) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS:_ _ DATE:_ SentaMber 251 19z�— REPRESENTATIVE: ES: 7 (8-53-50) M • OLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 0 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND SANITATION A C T I V I T Y R E P O R T Section FILE REFERENCE: Individual sewage disposal INDIVIDUAL OR ESTABLISHMENT: Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch ADDRESS: Meredith NARRATIVE: Code 12 County 57 They are planning to replace the cesspools located throughout the area behind the lodge with a 2500 gallon Cavitette aeriated treat- ment unit and leach field. I went over the required perc test if procedure and told them that we would anticipate correction of the problem within the next 2 to 3 months. I spoke to the owner of the lodge. He indicated to%e c 44ed fo do the work around September 15, and would call us in late July or early August to do the perc test. He wants to make sure all the guests are cleared out before he begins the excavation. LETTER TO FOLLOW: ( ) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: DATE: .Tina 98 , ES: 7 (Rev. 6-70-100) REPRESENTATIVE: *ORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 46 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND SANITATION A C T I V I T Y R E P O R T Section FILE REFERENCE: Private Sewage disposal INDIVIDUAL OR ESTABLISHMENT: Horeshoe Bend Guest Randch ADDRESS: Frying Pan NARRATIVE: Code County On May 22, I talked to Gary Rorvig, of the Forest Service. They stopped at the Horeshoe Bend Guest Rdnch, and made an investigation, since the property is leased from the Forest Service. They found problems relating to sewage disposal. It seems that there are at least three cabins that are presently being served with cesspools. Another couple of cabins are being served with a septic system that is malfunctioning, allowing sewage effluent to run upon the surface of the ground. Gary indicated to the owners that they could have all summer to rectify the problems. I replied that I would rather see it done in 30 days. He said that he would contact the jesee and straighten the situation out. He felt that they would shortly be contacting our roffice for a permi U.L-19. cll 4 1Kt,,,t. _t� LETTER TO FOLLOW: ( ) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: DATE: 5-22 , 19J4 . ES: 7 (Rev. 6-70-100) RE'RESENTATIVE: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH COUNTY OF PITKIN P. 0. BOX 1025 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 November 20, 1974 Mr. Boots Adams Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch Meredith, Co. 81642 Dear Xr. Adama: This letter is regarding the sewage disposal system at the Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch, located in Pitkin County, Colorado. Official notice was given last summer that the savage disposal system be brought into compliance with regulations. This has not been done. Theroperation will not be allowed to open for the 1975 season unless compliance has been obtained. Sincerely, James C. Roark, R.P.S. Pitkin County Sanitarian JCR;sgy Y Y Y Y O cc Z 'S O g W • �� Q �R Z "T �pGm NQ Op i�9a; w Q..�000 .. O.. QMH Q W •� w v v F v F v Q [" V W •E V �' r 9ba�aag D o� E 80E0.c a41V �"�' • V W 1O = .00 S 3 3 0 H 2 C - 4 W a a u w E D W 3 W 0 o Q y 6 a ro J o V< 3««>«? oMu WWZ �. O W W W • u.. W� O N w p `vii vi Gw G 0 W n i u Q Z cJi w i E c m [log ❑< < W .. .�C O eD < 7 PS Form 3811, Nov. 1973 RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED AND CERTIFIED MAIL 6 Dodson i�ngineered Products Box 248 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Attention: Stan Dodson Dear Stan, 0 May 30, 1975 r' I During a recent field trip to the Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch where a 2,500 gallon Gavitett _plant was found on the site, it was noted that the protective coating on the metal had been ill - applied in that it did not cover all metal portions of the tank on the outside. Further, it has come to me that in the past, some of these tanks have been found to leak. I think it is appropriate to bring these facts to your attention so that proper action can be taken. Another problem that has recently arisen concerns the Miller Iiichols fob. According to Peter Sanderson, he ran the percolation test himself, and further, no soil profile test hole was dug. I'm sure that you are aware of the section in the code which calls for percolation tests to be run by either a competent technician of the Health Department or a registered professional engineer, and that a soil profile test hole be dug for each leaching field installed. Furthermore, on the design sheet which was submitted, you failed to indicate the presence of a lake in the immediate vicinity of the sewage treatment system, nor did it indicate a flowing stream, again in the immediate vicinity of the system. It will be necessary on any future designed systems to: 1) properly run all of the tests; 2) that all relevant information be given; and 3) that the engineer's stamp be placed on the proposal. Further, all engineer designed systems must conform to the regulation by a letter of final inspection by the designing engineer indicating installation according to his design. Sincerely, James C. Roark, R.P.S. Pitkin County Sanitarian JCR:sgp 0 0 M HORSESHOE BEND GUEST RANCH DOME MEREDITH, COLORADO 81642 December 8, 1974 Mr. James C. Roark Dept. of Environmental Health County of Pitkin Aspen. Colorado Dear Mr. Roark: I am in receipt of your letter of the 20th, and I do want to assure you that the sewage disposal system of the Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch will be brought into complete compliance with regulations so that we may open for the 1975 season. As you well know, I attempted to bring our system into compliance with regulations this Fall, but due to the complexity of the situation, and the local and State regulations, we were unable to do this before we closed the ranch for the winter. I have approved preliminary plans submitted to me by Frasier & Gingery Engineers. I will ask them to let the contract so that we may begin with the new system at the time I arrive in the Spring. about May 1. Unless delayed by the contractor, I fully expect our new system to be in operation well before our usual summer season which begins June 1. I understand your concern, and join you in hopes that we can get our problem taken care of with the least difficulty. Hope you have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Sincere f �C O.B. Adams, owner Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch �)w PHONE 303-927.3570 A �f"ham n G•IJ �� i COUNTY 5 q LOCATI RTED BY SERVICE REQUESTED \AJ s'7 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REQUE T FOR SERVICE IVED BY0= DATE � ADDRE TELEPHONE DA TE SH -M-71 (4-71-50) r,.dPnquest Fbr Review Of Plansd Specifications For A PublickSwimn g Pood/Or Bath House TD: Colorado DeparMmt of Health Water Quality Control Division 4210 E. 11th Avenue County Denver, 00 80220 Permit # Bldg. _ From: Address: Pool: Address: Internal WQCD Use Only Plan Rec'D Spec ing By DCAL (Name of municipality, district, school or business) Phone No. Type Phone No. Address 3:20q;. Fryi. I. It is requested that the follavdng plans,* specifications, reports and design Information be reveiwed by your Department: List of Documents: (note: Design data on all treatment units must be submitted) 2. Below is a brief descrippt�ion of the improvements proposed: /Vfkle� (A 4 3. The water is to be obtained from the following source; 4. Potable Supply: 5. Make -Up Supply: 6. Is potable water supply chlorinated: Ytb 7. Name, Address and Phone Number of Design Engineers: U)'j:tc 40< Design Calculations Attached Yes No (required) Note: Plans and Specifications must be oomplete.in every detail not be acceptable for review. Page 1 of 3 *See Additional Sheets for Details Sketches will f Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Division Drinking Water Section Drawings & Specifications Data * Water Supply: Fill Spout Other Se Cross Connections A116 Waste Disposal: Deck Drains Filter Backwash Ab /r -i Gutter Drains Skimmers Generalr� Information: Make/Abdel 17,1b Shape —< !9,/Af 7 Ci all Length YJ/ Width Alex. Depth y Minimmn Depth --- Surface -Pe64 Capacity Gallons %i Fool Construction: Pneuratic (bncrete Placed Concrete Metal Other J Q(ald&S W.1 /�cQ Area y sq. ii Mechanical EquiM �L: Filter (s) Sand _)� Anthracite Other Pressure Gravity Hi -Rate Standard Nate Number of Filters Filter Area, Each 3• Square Feet 7bta1 Area ,�T� Square Fcet: Filtration Rate _ GPM/sq. ft. Vu hover Rate Hours. Backwash Rate Balance Tank _ Capacity _ 1�& Lint Strainer �� .�R-O-F Meter Location ermaneter L tions Influent GaugT--E�—. Effluent Gauge l Air Gap to Waste Circulation Pump Capacity GPA ft. TIN Horsepower of Driver Backwash Disch. Sight Glass Electrical: Location Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter is provided in mechanical room (Required by Regulations) (Yes or No ) Skimne T�'pe Make & Model Number (Are per 500 Sq. ft. of area, minimum 2 units *Avner, engineer and pool equipment supplier must complete this form and submit with the plans and specifications. Page 2 of 3 , , -.o 3U • • MS -4 Colorado Department of Health Water Qiality Control Division Drinking Water Section Request for Review Spa & Swimming Pool Drawings & Specifications Data, Jontinued Disinfection Area: Chlorine Location of n, **Room: Make -tip **Sel f-Cantained Air Louvre 4 Breathing Apparatus t0 11 11 ** Loca 7", -4-- �2,-Capacit S�'2,-Capacity **Switch Location Other Disinfection Equipment: 7�,pe Remarks **Shall Conform W/Latest Criteria For Liquid-C-ascous Chlorine Systems v Heater: ,fake r�Ye�Q zc 1 Type Vn C� ' (( Te 94 4¢ MU Input Pool Cleaning System: O TYM j5L 4KA UAL- flaw Operatol Other Equipment: Pjol Fenced !;L_ Deck, Width & Surface Finish Deck Slope p37 Deck Drains Cil z 5 Lignts Surface n Submerged Diving Board (s) Height Ladder (s) U Location Life Ring Life toes Reach Pole Inlets Spacing Depth Below WaterinL e PH & Chlorine Test Set yE.y Dressing Rens, 7bilets & Showers: Floors: Anti-siip Surfaces (,yes or no) Wails: Washable with hose j'yes or no) 3/4" Faucet bibs W/Vac BKR ( ) (yes or no) Toilets, urinals & LavatorieA for both sexes (yes or no) Concrete Walk to Pool (yes or no) (date) Signature of Designer) Late Recommended Approval CMA 7/81 Page 3 of 3 Recommended Disapproval Signature and title for Local Health Department or County Sanitarian Legally recofmized signature and title for the owner of the facility. M E M O R A N D U M J (e4- D1,5 -L —9108 TO: Glenn Horn, Assistant Planning Director FROM: Rick Bossingham, Environmental Health Officer DATE: June 2, 1988 RE: Rocky Mountain Health Ranch Water and Sewer Systems The septic system for the Rocky Mt. Health Ranch main lodge was designed to include the cabins west of the lodge (with 27 occupants), and for the lodge to be able to serve 50 meals three times per day. The other cabins have their own septic systems constructed before permits were required. There is a 40 feet deep well equiped with a chlorinator for disinfection. The operator is required to sample the well water quarterly. If you have any questions or comments about this matter, feel free to contact me. z • ASPEN*PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OEPARTNONT June 21, 1988 Dr. Rob Rrakovitz, Owner Rocky Mountain Health Ranch 32042 Frying Pan Road Meredith, CO 81642 Dear Dr. Rrakovitz, The plans for the Rocky Mt. Health Ranch hot tub have been reviewed by this office and are approved with the recommendation that a thermometer be provided to measure water temperature and make sure the water does get above 104 degrees F. If you have any questions or comments concerning this matter, feel free to contact me at this office. Sincerely, Rick Bossing Environmental Health Officer cc: Building Dept. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 61611 303/925-2020 l X M E M O R A N D U M 0 TO: Mr. Gary M. Fleeger, Engineering/Physical Sciences Aide Drinking Water Section Colorado Department of Health FROM: Bob Nelson, Department of Environmental Health DATE: March 11, 1988 RE: Horseshoe Bend Guest Ranch Bacteriological Water Samples - 32042 Frying Pan Road - Meredith, CO ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- We wish to inform you that the new owner of the referenced establishment is: Dr. Robert Wayne Rrakovitz P. 0. Box 9618 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Phone Numbers (303)925-3748 and (303)927-3570 This department received notice in January that the guest ranch property had sold, but we have not specifically contact the new owner to explain the requirements for submitting a bacterio- logical water samples. The ranch is closed to accomplish extensive repairs and remodeling and is not expected to reopen until late April. June 11, 1915 Mr. 0. 6. Adams horseshoe bend Guest Ranch Meredith, Colorado 81642 he: Site Application 11864, Horseshoe bend Guest Ranch Pitkin County Dear Mr. Adam: This is to Inform you that your application for approval of location for a 4850 gallons per day extended aeration unit and leaching system to be located at Horseshoe bend Guest Ranch, Pitkin County, Colorado, is being recommended for approval to the Colorado Mater quality Control Commission at Its regular meeting on July 15, 1975 subject to the following conditions: .1. A certification from the engineer mast be furnished prior to commencement of operation stating that the facilities were constructed as shown on the plans submitted or a Justification by the engineer and/or operating entity of any changes that were made. 2. This facility may have to be operated by a certified operator In accordance with the regulations established by the Certification Board for the water and Wastewater Treatment Plant Uperators. 3. This approval is rescinded on July 1, 1976 unless definite steps toward actual construction have been taken by that date. Unless you hear feether from us, this letter constitutes site approval and should be retained for your permanent records. We have revieweu the plans, specifications, and additional information submitted to this office and find they meet our design criteria. r 0 0 Mr. 0. S. Adams Horseshoe dent Guest Ranch June 11, 1975 Page 2 This approval does not relieve the owner from compliance with all county regulations prior to construction nor from the responsibility for proper engineering, construction, and operation of the facility. Very truly yours, FOR DIRECTOR, WATER 4UALITY CONTROL DIVISION Richetd N. Bowman District Engineer RHB:dec cci James Roark, Pitkin County Sanitarian Frasier & Ginery, Inc. Dlstrlct cnyineer r 0 0 Mr. U. E. Adams horseshoe dent Guest Ranch June 11, 1975 Page 2 This approval does not relieve the owner from compliance with all county regulations prior to construction nor from the responsibility for proper engineering, construction, and operation of the facility. Very truly yours, FOR DIRLCTOR, WATER 44UALITY CONTROL DIVISION Rlchadd n, bowman District Engineer Rhd:dec cc V James Roark, Pitkin County Sanitarian Frasier t Glnery, Inc. District cnylneer