HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.eh.247321200006 (1995)Document Layout
(From Most Recent to Oldest Permit)
Permit
Application
Log Sheet/Notes & Photos
Communications.
As -built Design
Engineer Design
Soil Information
Water Permit & Information
Second System on property
Third System.etc.
Floor Plans
Please See Building and Land Use Approvals Files for additional information.
- Pence'
to# x'173 -aId, "o0- (iQip
ASPEN/PITNVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTME
APPLICATION FOR AN AWIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (ISE) PER(vlfT
Name of OWNER 64II_I ChIA (AL d LlidLL Bus. Phone #
Mailing Address
Name of AGENT
Home Phone #
Bus. Phone #
IILLS
Mailing Address CJ Home Phone #
Copy of Permit to be Sent to:
'ERMIT IS FOR: () NEW INSTALLATION, () REPA12 (1 ERATIO DUE TO FAILURE, or () EMERGENCY USE for permit #'
3TREET ADDRESS of Property: (� 2i Ze 9- —at ,, dit eZ.4-
FGAL DESCRIPTION of Property:
of Loth acres Type of Structure Proposed
lot _, block filing _, and subdiv. _
# BEDROOMS _, # LOFTS _, # GARBAGE DISPOSALS _, # DISHWASHERS _, # CLOTHES WASHERS
Nater Supply: O Private Well, O Spring, (4/stroam, or O System (Public or Private Name:
3 PROOF OF ADEQUATE WATER ATTACHED? () YES or () NO HAS THIS PROJECT BEEN APPROVED BY PRION COUNTY? (') YES or () NO
,spacatbn for an Ind'Mduat sewage disposal system parmk le hereby NbmMed The uMaslgned acloawkdgas that the atwa< k0ame9an is liar and Nal false wo'en'Snn Will 4ry Ate Ne applicaam and
ny subseaumt parmit- hauance of Ne Mutt does not evpkitly er MprwWy W4* Rhe ar pa r of arty other permit renuimd la mru4uceon pv;Ao it b P'Jldn County codes. No conskuctim may 1,e undertaken
,it en approvals u permits have been o nad. The owner assumes ao raspouiaFOes b case or laeure a 4wdeguary of 114s system.
C I
3IGNATURE OF APPLICANT S L O Date
he application becomes invalid 120 days from the date signed This Permit is valid only for the design as specified below.
..............................BELOW FOR OFFICE USE ONLY.............................. .
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT # SO 3U
:150 fee paid (.1" Yes. Dale received 7- / p 7 ,'� Receipt # . ) j Al G Received By U AC-
)ESIGN CRITERIA OF SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED: Any changes must be submitted and approved in writing.
<s; n
of Bedrooms: Percolation Rate: mpi, Average-8eilyr-YPeete Flow: �0 gallons.
ICC✓i�.d fo re{d{cF
4ddr'rn of Ire-7w�Ck✓
sys�efi.� .
'.s an Engineer Designed system needed? ( ) Yes or WNo W dans ala ,, a.atbns d ere englncer man x Imo.ea any ct an os must be approved In wrturg and the an,..ear
:haa ce%&y the it installation to Ne ErAronmental Health Department In swWng)
'/diinimum Septic Tank Capacity , so gallons , Absorption Area MY square feet minimum A
(y Absorption Bed, O Absorption Field In Trenches, (N Giravet-less system, O Pumping/Dosing Chamber, O Absorption Pit
eoc e sh'ng iailr+ fwe13 &P fro/✓�ed hi `&c- bl4cfc uut4er- st/51e[.L. )lur' jr-elw4}� sy5fcu. 15 k'-yj
an A 30-harr✓ elelznh'pn fi' for 4j" i3nr 4 a 30 0/_,reditd'.Y7 Tdr rauel(css ehdte kxrs rn a bed.
h;s reau.ec5 l" 5ya4re ffe9w,efuZ4 in /35-}ty e/- 8 CLt�gt�f.--5-
3tages�quiring inspection: () Before excavation, () Upon completion and prior to placement of gravel, y)"eefore covering distribution system of absorption
field, ( Prior to backfill of any component and any situation deemed necessary by Environmental Health Department Staff.
n.na eM sperm tams of ew proposed Ind Mdual acwage disposal "ea, Neve been revtewad aM are consid satidactosy. Pern+sibn k hereby granted b the awrer a Ns agent b ,edam Ne w k
Mlriled aba e in aee r !a a whh Ne PdWn County lnery ual Sewage Dsposai FYgrM4orrs In effect on N daze or lssue. M edG4on b general P a slons sat IoM h e Y aaarlunants. this Permit is subject
D the fd1o.M,q adSnional terms end conei4 s a any:
'kPPROVED FOR ISSUE BY: DATE OF ISSUE: j /Q -QS IOr;G tali 11-30'el�iffewSel+J
M above Ln Mdual sewage d-,sposal system hes been Insgeded la y96 by Ne Emvaranental Heaah DeparNrer6. The aft responalHntias In cags d failure a 1ladeguacy of Nis
.Ystesn Comdele e`- tt drawing era e11 sped6,6ons of as are Indude/dd vNh--,nN,is p ft -
7 INAL
-7INAL (NSPECTION BY: BUJ DATE OF FINAL INSPECTION:
'�MUDD'JTCPCV/P.PERMn.B.I 1J0 GALE,, qUET ASPEN, CO OnaDO 81611 . PHONE a 92 5070 FAX ao].920.518T
'.TEND INe PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
�s+eu is 1C. 5easoTal NtLfl). Pi feS tr yrec/ waLkv Sysfea musil- 6e dreulned 4
lloi used In Win%r. I l
I of ��
'ASPENIPIT1<IN.ENVIRUNMEN.IAL;-JiL
Htlti UtPAH1.MENl
FINAL SYSTEM DESIGN
FINAL SPECIFICS OF THE SYSTEM INCLUDED UNDER THIS PERMfT:
(AS -Built Conditions)
Type of Tank or Treatment Unit )p{&s%.L Tank CapacIty: 30 o . .gelbns -
Type of Absorption FIeld: 6r ,4w_,& S-5 Atuorptlon Area: - ""I"'
DESCRIPTION, CONDITIONS,'AND SPECIFICATIONS OF SYS bM DESIGN.
9NAL AS -BUILT PLOT PLAN: .
A rid. 5k 300 gOai YaAL cues T1s}G/��: si ve yrorrid �rty
wa4ir. %/u Ee.I� was lcwij., (9w ., w; tr ;mss it in a o f i X51
llno 0 lL Via_ Icexh +ii(d v %awx plurc�p+n4 . Shead
J -bac P(G;,..ly
a� hitt 0�rali 4ank fa ctd ,wl�l�i: erns s d.l�e�. 8 riwcfltss_.
'in a- bcd
��I cues., u�" 5liil 4t(c'.1 ,� N svcuiccl
�i w,
sal{ `lcrowlc! Icaclt --iticf. �tL� 5,k ..CoisiraInfs u�+out-C�rdcnc{
�nSlu fi� wfl5 aUowc c ..
/Tvyi�
IT in51{.Wilt iJL 6.0-4lf
4tu- 4ZAiCbn.lie -fe caucr cn+,'�c �ILvIIC F�cctPf �✓
Ay- "A do k Coucr^.. .
t�Lt�nl✓ Wil(
�i�&--,
FlNAL WSPECTION BY:
Dft 4CSin5.4ZZtt("'o,) i5 fouP{t C: A1C.
U ..
130 SWn/ GMB4A SM Wr ASPEN. COIDMM alatl . PMW ]019Y1 70 . FAX] 92 197
PRNFW ON FLC%XXM PAPM
Parce a 4 7 3 L9 0
ASPEN/Pf* ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMRW
APPLICATION FOR AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (?SDS) PERMIT
Name of OWNER NOCK 1 Lwow, 1\cT--A Bus. Phone # q 20 - 5b88
Mailing Address l r 0 .13 o K 7 D 0 6 f}s Dim Cfi. , g /% 1A Home Phone # 313 --5(
0
Name of AGENT Bus. Phone #
Mailing Address
() Copy of Permit to be Sent to:
Home Phone #
PERMIT IS FOR: (t{ NEW INSTALLATION, () REPAIR, () ALTERATION NOT DUE TO FAILURE, or () EMERGENCY USE
u't//Q�+�'k
for permit 4 -2 �b .
STREET ADDRESS of Property: 26 IR 16 FK1'fa fs IZO.D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of Property:
Size of Lot I .0 l acres Type of Structure Proposed s Ar il"J
lot _L, block = filing . and subdiv. 0 ?AIV WOODS
# BEDROOMS I # LOFTS # GARBAGE DISPOSALS _. # DISHWASHERS A, # CLOTHES WASHERS O .
Water Supply: O Private Well, O Spring. (W Stream, or O System (Public. or Private Name: 1
IS PROOF OF ADEQUATE WATER ATTACHED? () YES or WINO HAS THIS PROJECT BEEN APPROVED BY PRHIN COUNTY? (r) YES or () NO
AP01.11on 1104' an MWhWual sewage disposal system Parra Is hereby aWmaled The unOanigned-W-Aed9es out 0r, above Hameaon is trlra ww"rese bsarnWba w0. I4'rveadale the application and
eery subsequent Paas im...,,w of sw pensk does not mm9dtly or kgI1111 bpi she approval Of airy other pima tepuLed b4' cone"ve nPtamrarst b P"C-,*codes. tro consv0 on may be undertaken
mill as approvals and permits have been obtalrsee. The owner measles as 4'e+Mma>ase M case d lasers or Ludeguwy of sds system.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT L4L Z� Date
The application becomes Invalid 120 days from the date signed. This Permit is valid only for the design as specked below.
♦aaussuasaaassesaaasaaeeas"BELOW FOR OFFICE USE ONLY`ssssssssasassssesssssssessu•
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT #_-
5150 fee paid V<1a Date received I v 7 Receipt # Received Bq-_�Ob✓
DESIGN CRITERIA OF SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED: Any changes must be submitted and approved in writing.
# of Bedrooms: —L—, Percolation Bate: N,4 mpir Average Dally Waste Flow: gallons.
Is an Engineer Designed system needed? () Yes or 0 No W pans and spxacad. of t m engineer shag by followed. Any changes aaat be approved in sniON and the ergines
shat cerMy the fmN Installation W the EmbOnmedal Health Deparbred N oft
Minimum Septic Tank Capacity A1,4— gallons Absorption Area /✓A square feel minimum
O Absorption Bed, O Absorption Field In Trenches, O Gravel -less system. O Pumping/Dosing Chamber, O Absorption PR - --
R model) which is nlsF V R frddtd w%// ba insulted.
,1�h;s {bile} toil( W✓ice- 1"4 lnto !t !4'r rueetend s ✓acof;rn est, q-6 eoi47',, 0.s &SC. 0744 i�sfQ//td,
f �,,Q4 ins�cyv, w;l( be reqreel �he 0" f/c�u drain [¢nn f � usc�f in lGu ground
S ages r u ring inspection: () Before excavation, ) 'Pon completion and prior to placement of gravel �) Before cove ng distribution system of absorption
field,' any situation deemed necessary by Environmental Health Department Stell.
Fnans and s fications d the proposed kWlHdual sawa" disposal sisters hew been rMewed snd ere considered sadssrsa,y. Pe nissbn rs hereby graded b eve owner a his sorrel b Perform the wok
lndiors ed above in accordance w the, Pekin Comely bwRvklual Seweoe Rfposel Hegulaaons In esecl men date d Issas N a dlon b gensew pewisiaos bet foo In erg' atladmnmis, tlms Permit k subject
to the loeowkg eddilienal terms and wndNons a anal
APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY: /�+ /� 4 DATE OF ISSUE:
h above MdrvWud sewage deposal system hu been brspakd Ib/ ResEnvhaunenlel Heenh Depadmeel. The owner assumes ea sesponsWittes in case of rasher, or inedeguacy of this
sj t Canpwe as We drawing and as specifications of asbasl IrwWW with airs permit.
FINAL INSPECTION BY: DATE OF FINAL INSPECTION:
OTNUOOJTCPC:wP:PERMn.&1 150 SOUTH CALF STREET ' ASPEN• COLORADO 91611 . prIONE 501920.50)0 ' FM 50.7.920.5191
.PPoNTEO ON RECYCLED PAPER
'OEM IMa
5
• �1
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Betsey Kipp CC Chuck Roth
From: Tom Dunlop
Postmark: Dec 05,95 9:48 AM
Subject: Chuck Roth
Message:
I spoke to Chuck today re his septic tank. I asked him to install
insulation (foam or roofing insulation) on the inside of the
structure he is building around the tank. I also asked him to have
the closest distance between the tank and the support wall be no
closer than 2 feet, and to use fine bedding rock/soil next to the
tank to prevent punctures to the tank. The corners of the structure
will be further than 2 feet since the tank is spherical and the
sturcture is square. He agreed to this as well as stating he would
notch and spike the logs together forming the box.
---------- =====X=====___-------
11
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Chuck Roth
CC Lee Cassin
From: Tom Dunlop
Postmark: Nov 30,95 8:30 AM
CC Betsey Kipp
Subject: Reply to a reply: Grey water septic tank
---------------------------------------------------
Reply text:
From Tom Dunlop:
The code provisions are not able to be varied by anyone. An engineer
must work within the codes when designing their systems. That
requires any ISDS to use the minimum standards defined in the State
Rules and Regulations which we used to create the Pitco Code. Chuck,
we are empathetic to your case, but we cannot authorize what you want
us to. There are minimum requirements in our dept just like there
are in your dept. The codes are created to offer protection of
natural resources, which is the goal of our dept with the ISDS code.
Preceding message:
From Chuck Roth:
Thanks for the help. I am confused though because I thought that an
engineered system was acceptable in lieu of code provisions. A 300
gallon septic tank in lieu of 25 gallon grease interceptor is very
onerous for us and seems extreme for the intended use of a cabin.
The engineer says that there is nothing to settle out that would
damage the leach field, the ground water, or the river.....
From Tom Dunlop:
Yes, good news. The County Attorney's office agreed with us that our
formula was wrong. We can now use the detention time of 1.25 days
instead of 3 days. I think Betsey figured that you could use a 250
gallon tank now. Please see her. Thanks for calling our attention to
the flaw in the equation.
From Chuck Roth:
Ok - thanks.
Anything new on the grey water tank sizing?
Thanks for your help.
ri
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO env health
From: Tom Dunlop
Postmark: Nov 21,95 2:43 PM
Subject: grey water formula
Message:
We can change our ISDS formula for calculating the gallonage of
septic tanks to read 30 hours (1.25 days) instead of 3 days. Debbie
Quinn felt we could do that as long as it is not in conflict with
state guidelines, and as long as we treat everyone the same. There
fore, as of this date we can administratively change the formula on
page 49 under Grey Water System to read: # of gpd - 24.8 gpd for
sewage x 2 people/bdrm x # of bdrms x 1.25 days = septic tank size.
0 0
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Chuck Roth CC Betsey Kipp
From: Tom Dunlop
Postmark: Nov 14,95 11:30 AM
Subject: ISDS
Message:
Please see us re your ISDS permit. We are trying to get the formula
changed that we use to calculate septic tank size. We agree that
there is something wrong with it and want to correct it before you
get your permit. I have the county attorney's office working on it
too. thanks
,=======X====== ---------
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Betsey Kipp
From: Chuck Roth
Postmark: Oct 25,95 11:57 AM
Subject: Grey water permit
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Message:
I have met with Dean Durosier for his help, so he will be calling you
if he hasn't already.
0
Lp�ooE,e Up Tb
bEPTiC TdtIL
'E�'2• Asour-i ?aor^-
Fib
CIUA-L-(Ty -)
ir)
-F-FPt-ua,.rr
Pl PF Fr-ql
r(c -r7tNk
LA , k
V(pc p-
,�E 4s°
fk,aa.41s
*fT(C TVrn4- 1plplt CG,
UPPF.(L PIPE Is Kom
4 5 ' E Lu-, ..rS.
LOW F -,e ?(PE IS
EFFLuE-,Aj-(
fr)2
P2o Fn S EPT ( c
FAAnllc To LEAcH
P (ELD
is
0
5F-P7ic TAr�v. WITH
5A-oL- Ft( -L.
fJ CTF (Z -3 0
�►JSOL- A—ntot 3-
INFLuctj—( CFFLuFi%�f
PIPP,s 70 P J0 F�ec-"
SEP%c -FA J j:-
0 •
t- POLY erErYL" Sµ6E r SPrFFLE
t (6QtFFLC IQST'ALc&O (ij SFPTIc TANK
l�
Betsey Kipp
Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
P.O. Box 7006
Aspen, Colorado 81611
September 18, 1995
Re: Addendum to Application for Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit
Dear Betsy:
Attached please find the above referenced application. This is an addendum to our original
application which was submitted on July 18, 1995. That application was for the sewage
component of our cabin waste system. A copy of that application is included. This
addendum is for the gray water component of the cabin waste system.
We received a variance for the setback of the cabin. A copy is enclosed. A copy of a
location map is also enclosed.
The cabin water system will be a 500 gallon plastic cistern installed on a concrete pad
underneath the cabin. There will be in-line filters, an ultraviolet treatment, and a
pressurizing tank to provide water to a kitchen sink, a bathroom sink, the two pint flush
composting toilet, and a shower. The water system will be for summer use only and will be
drained down for the winter. There will be no garbage disposal, no washing machine, and
no dishwasher.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please let me know.
Thanks for your help.
Sincerely,
Chuck Roth
/y
r
L95.74
' ASPEN/PDKIN.ENVIRONMENTAL,HEALTH DEPARTMENT '.: 2�
• FINAL SYSTEM DESIGN.; ti
FINAL SPECIFICS OF THE SYSTEM INCLUDED UNDER THIS PERMIT:
(As -Built Conditions)
Type of Tank or Treatment Unit: - Tank Capacity: p .gallons
Type of Absorption Field: LEkco Absorption Area: f.-lJ square feet / I L� ( (�(�0►�iS
DESCRIPTION, CONDRIONS. AND SPECIFICATIONS OF SYSTEM DESIGN: ...
KITCtto:,.1 : 4- f L , ItAL.F PIPE OF 2¢" 17,IOt
�3ATf4�ooM 51tJK Sltoul F.ft 6' °l. ,
HALF pipe of 9-411 t)(,A ,
FSQTN WITH. 2�.a c6V15112 j C-xCAVaTio,J DEPTH
FINAL AS-BuILT PLOT PLAN: 5 u K M E,2.. y S e W L y _
I
FINAL iNSPECRON BY. DATE OF WASPEC ION:
�oTTtvoD:ncPcampEruarsr
130 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 61611 PHONE ]0192 70 FAX =.M5197
Pf9NTED ON HECMED PAPER
F
0 To
NOV 0 31995
Ef%
MMLTD.Mcl.auohlln Wa*ar lnalnaara
Dates November 1, 1995
Tot Betsy Kip; Pitkin County Environmental Health Department
F ro m: G. Dean Derosier, P. E - McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd.
RE i Grey Water Septic System; 95-034.01
Chuck Roth as you know, has constructed a cabin on the Frying Pan
River, and is in the process of completing the 1041 application
and building permits and other requirements such as the septic
system. The cabin is proposed to be used for summer use facility
only not a full time residence. Measures to restrict the use are
being dealt with by Mr. Roth and Pitkin County. I have been
hired by Mr. Roth to design the septic system for the cabin,
which has 2 bedrooms, kitchen, and a bathroom\shower. A
composting toilet has been approved by your office for treatment
of the black water. What remains is designing a septic system
for the grey water disposal only.
The following are my recommendations for a septic system to treat
the grey water from the Roth cabin.
Leach Field
The leach field design is fairly straight forward. The soils
have an average percolation rate of 15 MPI. The flow from the
home can be calculated using approximately 50 gallons per day per
person for a grey water system only, (75 - 24.54 - 50.06). Since
this is a cabin, no dishwashers, disposal, or washing machines
are to be installed, minimizing the water use. g = Flow - 2
bedrooms x 2 people per bedroom x 50 gallons per day per person
gives an anticipated flow of 200 gallons Per day. Using the
standard Pitkin County calculation for area required, for a septic
field, (using no reductions for grey water systems,`any size /
reductions are built into the flow calculation). The area
required would be 155 Sq Ft., utilizing a 30% reduction for the
use of infiltraxo its leaves a required area of 108 Sq Ft. or
approximately 6 -feet' f infiltrators. This is adequate to
safely and effec y treat the grey water effluent.
Septic Tanks reef (& tkttmkXl )
The sizing of the septic tanks are the biggest issue. The ,/
location and access to the cabin limited the septic tanks si,ze-
that can be brought into the cabin, but this is not the .real
problem. Sizing the septic tank in the Pitkin Cq.Wnt�y--Regulations
requires that the g or the flow be multiplied b} to get a
septic tank for a grey water system. This would require a 600
gallon septic tank, or because 600 gallon tanks are not
%(p available, 750 gallons is the closest tank size available.
that a small
smaller than
My understanding of the purposes of a septic tank in a grey water
system is basic. 1. Flow equalization. 2. Allow settling out of
solids. 3. Contain grease and floatable materials. There is no
need for storage in a standard gravity feed septic system, IE -
this system is not being pumped. The required installation of
750 gallon septic tank seams to be extreme for purposes that
don't exist. Without solids from a blackwater system, the needs
for a septic tank are reduced not increased. Flow from the
bathroom will have very few solids, as most of them will come
from the kitchen sink as will the grease. The installation of a
grease trap on the sink and a considerably smaller septic tank,
such as a 25 gallon grease interceptor or other similar sized
tank would allow the system to meet the purposes described above
for the septic tank. A grease interceptor for a typical home is
only 10 to 15 gallons. Increasing the size of the tank to 25
gallons would help equalize the flow and allow for settling of
solids.
u have any other information on the sizing of tanks for grey
systems or have other recommendations for a smaller septic
please call me. Please review my recommendations and feel
t call me at anv time.
17
ASPEN PITKIN
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT
'Wo4-4-
�r� _ /Smyi
b 5 , n Flow (0
ZxzxToxl7s=35'0
Z )< Z x 50 x 1.?�' 50
Flak zkZxsox /Ly as�9Pd
ft= 76 x 3,87
FF= X50 x V JS
S
f1= l 4't f i
q0 �4 1, �G 3 1.1 i
or /0 ltn +s
(970) 920-5070
130SOUTH GALENA STREET
ASPEN,COLORAm8l6ll
I
N
i
Betsey Kipp
Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
r�
u
P.O. Box 7006
Aspen, Colorado 81611
July 18, 1995
Re: Application for Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit
Dear Betsy:
Attached please find the above referenced application. Also attached is a copy of the
catalog page of the "cottage toilet" that we have ordered after I discussed the item with you.
The Centrex drain will be connected to our Sears Porta -potty that we have been using at the
property for the past five years. The tank on the Porta -potty has a gauge indicator, and we
will take the tank home for emptying into our toilet as we are currently doing. There will be
no drainage to the ground.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please let me know.
Thanks for your help.
Sincerely,
Chuck Roth
L95.60
.0
CENTRAL COMPOSTING TOILET&YSTEMS
Central Composting Toilet Systems are design or those who prefer a flush toilet in the bathroaMWth the
composting unit outside, or in a basement. This central composting unit is normally within 20 feet of the toilet, and is ank
connected via a 3" plumbing pipe. Installation requires hooking up the water supply to the low flush toilet
connecting the 3" waste piping to the cemposting unit; and assembling the vent stack (included with the unit).
"VCM"
(Water Closet Multram)
The WCM is the original central composting unit
s and was first introduced in 1979. This dependable,
ai rugged and highly successful system, has the same
three chambers and large insulated Bio -drum as
the EXCEL family of units. The main difference
�' . • is that with central toilet systema the waste enters
the Bio -drum through a 3" inlet pipe connected
l . to one or more I pint flush toilets. The small
-' - ., amount of extra flushing water keeps the compost
on central units very moist, which means that
composting speeds and hence capacity, tend to be
even greater than on self contained unite. Peat mix is added to the Bio -drum on the WCM either
by removing the access door on the front of the unit, or by flushing it down the toilet. The WCM is
only 2271" wide, an it Ste well into narrow spaces. The vent and drain on the WCM are located at the
which makes this
-- - unit the obvious choice for
— installation in a
basement with the vent
--- going through or up the
• wall. The WCM is 31" high,
but additional clearance
is required to accommodate the 3" waste inlet pipe on the top of the unit.
Evaporating capacity of the WCM can be up to 2-3 gallons per day,
depending on climatic conditions, and on the volume, warmth, and absorption
capacity of the compost. This may be insufficient, and the drain hose provided,
should be connected to the 1" drain at the rear of the unit. Exceas liquid,
if any, should be collected and/or disposed of in an approved facility such as a
leach field, old septic system,holding tank or drain pit.
Capacity (People):
7.9 Weekend & Vacation use; 4-6 Residential/Continuous use.
SPECIFICATIONS:
Electrical: 115 Volts, 2.5 Amps (Maximum)
25 Watt Fan, 250 Watt Heater (Approximately Average Use 150 Watt)
Vent & Drains: 2" Vent Pipe And Fittings (Supplied With Unit)
1" Overload Drain (Requires Hook Up)
Dimensions: Width 22'1,", Height 32", Length 33"; Weight: 55lbs.
Required For Installation: Height To Pipe Inlet 31";
Required Length To Remove Drawer. 51"; Width To Rotate Handle: 26"
Shipping Carton: W 27", H 35", L 35"; Shipping Weight: 95lbs.
"CENT M (Central/ External
Composting System)
The CENTREX was first produced in 1993, and although it looks very different from the WCM, both central
composting units have the same well proven, high capacity three chamber system. The main difference
between the two is that the CENTREX has been designed with the insulated Bio-dmm mounted
transversely. Also, the fan and vent have been located at the front to give the CENTREX a lower profile, and
make it 100% front serviceable.
The CENTREX and WCM have the same composting performance, but the differences in the physical
arrangement of the components are often important from an installation point of view. Although the
CENTREX is 27%" high, the waste inlet pipe is only 26'/." from ground level. This low profile makes the
CENTREX the unit of choice for installations under, or to the side of buildings where height is important,
and the unit is to be vented up a side wall. If the CENTREX is to be exposed, electrical components should be
protected from rain and flooding.
The waste enters the CENTREX Bio -drum through a 3" inlet pipe which connects the unit to a I pint
flush toilet in the bathroom. When possible,
this toilet should be right above the CENTREX
because this arrangement is easier to install and a
minimum of flushing water is needed to transport
the waste.
Although distances of over 20 ft. are not
normally recommended, central units have been
successfully installed up to 40 ft. away from the
toilet. For such longer distances, an extra weekly
flush through may be needed. The 3" waste piping should be either vertical (that is from
45' to 90') and/or close to horizontal with a drop of from 71" to '/4" per foot (a slope of
about 2 to 3 degrees). Apart from very short runs, anglesof 5' to 45' should be avoided
because then the water tends to leave the waste behind. The CENTREX is supplied
complete with a straight waste inlet connection. This can be replaced by a 45' or 90' fitting,
if necessary, to provide inlet access from any direction. In Ontario, for some installations,
horizontal piping may be limited by regulations.
'" C=4 ��" ...continued
Where there is not enough height for the wasteavity feed from the toilet to the composting unit, t
necessary height can often be obtained either by p ng the toilet on a small platform in the bathroom, an or
lowering the central composting unit. The toilet may not have to be raised very far to achieve this. To avoid a
step-up, a low profile toilet with a shortened pedestal can be used, and mounted on a 6" wooden platform
to provide the correct seat height. (The Sealand 911 and 511 are low pedestal toilets). If the composting unit
is to he lowered, care should be taken to ensure that rainwater drains away from the unit and the finishing
drawer can be removed. The CENTREX's evaporation performance of up to 2.3 gallons per day
may not be sufficient to evaporate all the liquid. This depends on the
amount of flushing water and waste, the climatic conditions, and the
warmth, moisture and volume of compost in the Bio -drum. The 1" drain
hose supplied with the unit, should be hooked up, and excess liquid, if
any, should be collected and/or disposed of in an approved facility each as
a leach field, old septic system, holding tank or drain pit.
Peat mix should be added and the Bio -drum rotated twice a week
(while the unit is in use), or on departure (for weekend use). Some
compost is removed in the Spring or when the Bio -drum gets % full, by
rotating the drum backwards and extracting some compost
into the pull-out finishing drawer.
_ If the CENTREX is to be used throughout the winter,
care must be taken to keep the installation warm.
.r Exposed piping should be insulated, and the unit should
e- - be plugged in, and placed in a warm insulated enclosure.
,u- cvaxx A light bulb is often all
that is needed to keep
,r such an enclosure warm.
For limited use during
the winter (say 3-4
- f weekends),
the unit can
i •'' still be used
'- or even where
the compost
is frozen in the drum. The CENTREX can be plugged in on arrival so that
the heater and the ventilation system are working. The Bio -drum can then
be used as a holding tank If the water supply to the low flush toilet is not
connected, the toilet can still be flushed manually by using a container of water.
Capacity (People):
7.9 Weekend & Vacation use; 4-6 Residential/Continuous use.
SPECIFICATIONS:
Electrical: 115 Volts, 2.5 Amps (Maximum)
25 Watt Fan, 250 Watt Heater (Approximately Average Use 150 Watt)
Vent & Drains: 2" Vent Pipe And Fittings (Supplied With Unit)
1" Overload Drain (Requires Hook Up)
Dimensions: W (Excluding Handle) 32", H 27'h", Depth 27" (Incl. Fan)
Product Weight: 55lbs., Required Height To Pipe Inlet MY,";
Required Depth To Remove Drawer: 40"; Width To Rotate Handle: 37'/."
Shipping Carton: W 27", H 29'/:", L 35"; Shipping Weight: 95lbs.
„CENTN.E."
(non -electric)
The CENTREX N.E. is the non electric version of the CENTREX, and was
developed for those without a continuous supply of 110 Voll power. Instead of
a fan and heating element, the CENTREX N.E. comes with a 4" vent stack
which exits from the front of the unit and acts like a chimney on a wood stove.
This vent stack, which should be erected as close to vertical as possible, draws
air into the composting unit to provide oxygen, evaporate liquid, and ensure
odorless operation.
A 12 Volt fan should be used if the unit is to be used heavily or
residentially; or is located where downdraft can occur, such as in areas
surrounded by mountains or high trees. This fan draws only 1.4 Watts
and can be powered with either a solar panel (6.5 Watt) and/or 12 Volt
battery. It is supplied in a small section of 4" pipe for installation
directly in the vent stack.
The CENTREX N.E. has a slightly lower profile than the CENTREX
and stands only 261/," high (the waste inlet is only 25'12" from ground
leve!). Width is the same as the CENTREX at 32" but because the Mor P,,,,i ,qy-, x- x I-,
CENTREX N.E. has no fan housing, depth is only 231h". y
Otherwise, all the installation considerations are the same as for L
the CENTREX. (See above).
Although evaporation is improved by the 12 Volt fan, the 1" hose
(provided) should be connected, and any liquid which is not
evaporated should be led to a drain pit or other approved facility.
Capacity (People): -
SPECIFICATIONS: 6-8 Weekend & Vacation use; 3.4 Residential/Continuous use.
o"mm�.lir o..i" (ceu•rasx, �, N.E.'.)
Vents & Drains: Dimensions: Width (Excluding Handle) 32", Height 27Y.", Depth 23".
4" Vent Pipe And Fittings (Supplied With Unit) Product Weight: 45lbs., Required Height To Pipe Inlet 251/+";
1" Overflow Drain (Requires Hook Up) Required Depth To Remove Drawer: 40"; Width To Rotate Handle: 37'h"
Options: 12 Volt Electric Fan, 1.4 Watt (Installed In 4" Vent Pipe) Shipping Carton: W 27", H 35", L 35'; Shipping Weight: 90lbs.
0
Mou Au1 i �
End IsPuR K
�Ow�.l prr
M�TH-
I
��
- c NaPMAn� RAS FKVgP�
cpBc►
4S) TOY RE-rAar
' REU6
REsewo I
FOgp j- SI"ItwcF— 'P�-oP
A
mIVEWA,
LEe,F,jo :
l 5RlC>C-J---
IV- t4-44-
103
ASPEN/PITRIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena, Aspen CO 81611
(303) 920-5070
SOIL DATA FORM
PROPERTY ADDRESS Z6810-F–yoJe. fA4 ROkofro
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OLl{)� WOOP3 ONE.L St,ppIJ151r,wi
PROPERTY OWNER:„
ADDRESS FIG.
PHONE
Note:
* Percolation Test Result Form and Site Plan must be submitted
with this form.
* Percolation acid profile holes should be located within a 1200
square foot area'of the proposed septic system.
* For lots <5 acres the site plan must include the entire lot.
* Location of percolation and profile holes must be mapped
adequately and identified with. -stakes, flagging, etc.
Percolation holes must be identified.as•#l,#2, and.#3.
• Smeared surfaces removed: _Yes _No "I(
• Sand or gravel added: _Ycs . ✓ No
• Date and time presoak water added;
9/10/95 Same AM
• Amount of presoak water added (gallons):
#1 • 156A[.•#Z-2a C3AL•#3-406At.
• Date and time percolation test is started:
9/10/95 1:i19 PM
Did water remain in hole after the overnight swelling
period:
Hole L _Yes _No
Hole 2 _Yes _No
Hole 3 _Yes _No
Percolation Rate Measurement
Percolation Rate (minlin.)
Hole 1 )r1
Hole 2
Hole 3_
Avc g� 15
*__ N/A = KANO 1>06 BOWES
Encountered @ =feet.
Estimated depth to -maximum seasonal
water table if not encountered in
profile O't
Is area believed to be subject to seasonal
fluctuations which could result in a
seasonal water table within 8' of surface?
Yes V�, No
Slope determination in absorption area:% to
the 4%/ (direction) .
Redrock-
Encountered @ =feet.
• Estimated depth if not encountered in
profile:
I— -
Type ofbedrock- _Sandstone
Claystone Silmone
Otter
Is bcdfoek fractured or wcadtcred?
Yes _No
Is bedrock believed to be permeable?
(Pere rate <60 min -!n.)
Ycs No
I �: -.-,: t I
Prorxie Role Information
Soil. s must be classified 46 Soil type
To F -SO I L
—2
61LACIA-LL PtLLUVI.*G
SAPJ D 6r4AVjf-L (!O13i3LFS. Te, D(A
10
Certification
I certify that the above information is correct and complete to the
best of my kpowledge and that all tests were performed in
accordance with the provisi6ns of the Aspen/Pitkin Health
Departmetit Sewage Regulations Title x by myself or under my
supero
Nv,—,71F
Orioinal Signature Date
SELF
Company Y Naine..
Ad&6ss
e,
Plione
QC/
o�Pp0
,V E Ro.
�SBIp
N L
Original Seal
4
—6
61LACIA-LL PtLLUVI.*G
SAPJ D 6r4AVjf-L (!O13i3LFS. Te, D(A
10
Certification
I certify that the above information is correct and complete to the
best of my kpowledge and that all tests were performed in
accordance with the provisi6ns of the Aspen/Pitkin Health
Departmetit Sewage Regulations Title x by myself or under my
supero
Nv,—,71F
Orioinal Signature Date
SELF
Company Y Naine..
Ad&6ss
e,
Plione
QC/
o�Pp0
,V E Ro.
�SBIp
N L
Original Seal
0 0
Soil Report & Leach Field Design
The subject property is located at 26810 Frying Pan Road, Meredith, Colorado. The
property is on the inside of the confluence of the North Fork Creek and the Frying Pan River. t
The property is generally triangularly shaped. The south boundary is about 600 feet abutting the
White River National Forest. The easterly boundary is about 700 feet along the centerline of the
North Fork Creek. The westerly boundary is about 275 feet along the centerline of the Frying
Pan River. The site is small - 1.87 acres, with uniform surface conditions and vegetation across
the property.
An eight foot deep hole was dug for the power pole at a distance of 120 feet from the
cabin. The top six inches was top soil. The remainder of the soil profile was alluvial till with
sand, gravel and cobbles to about one foot in diameter. The surface conditions are uniform
across the property, and there is no evidence of any soil changes within the 120 feet to the cabin
no within about a half mile of the site, at which point is found outcropping bed rock.
The percolation test results are included on the required forms. The soil is well drained.
The design of the gray water leach fields, and the water system design, is for a summer
use cabin. There will be a single sink in the kitchen, a sink in the bathroom, and a shower.
There will be no garbage disposal, no dishwasher, and no washing machine. The toilet has been
previously permitted and is a composting toilet with no discharge to ground.
The kitchen sink leach field will be constructed of a four foot long half pipe with a 24"
diameter. The volume will be 47 gallons. The bathroom shower and bathroom sink leach field
will be constructed of a six foot long half pipe with a 24" diameter. The volume will be 70
gallons. The total leach field volume will be nearly 120 gallons, which is considerably larger
than the 7 gallons that was sized for the cabin at our meeting of May 25, 1995.
The excavation for the kitchen sink leach field will be the same depth as the perc test hole
- 14". Two feet of cover will be placed on top of the leach field.
The excavation for the bathroom shower and sink leach field will be 16" deep. Two feet
of cover will be placed on top of the leach field.
Mv5.194
as
tit't;[1/errrctTr Lt(�IItONI�2ENTALTU- T_1 -PAi;n i+�tEtvT'
0130 South. Galena, Aspen, CG *,I i
303-920-5070
Percolation Test Result Form
Hole
Hole Length of Water Depth Water Depth Drop In (orcotatio
Hole Depth' Interval @ Start CO End
No. (in.) (min.) of Interval oil (illWater r Level'- Rate Interval io pal
in (in.)
5
"Field Notes shall be recorded on.%his form or in this format.- typed copies of rield records may
be submitted on this form.
'A four hour test mast be conducted unless (a) water remains in the hole -after the -presoak in
which case one 30 min., interval is -sufficient.. (b) the first 6" of.water seeps away in <30
minutes in which case a one-hour test of 6 - 10 minute time intervals ntay be used, (c) the test
is being conducted in sand in which case a one hour test of 6 - 10 minute time intervals may
be used, (d) three successive,water!evel drops do not vary.'by more than 11/16 inch in which
case P_ two hour test may be conducted.
3
OOPOSED SITE PLAN
5 E F k-r-mCtt'Fp
SEPTIC TANK SIZE gallons
FIELD SIZE SPECIFICATIONS
TYPE: EEO)or BED (circle one)
# of trenches �—
LENGTH feet r 6
A— r
WIDTH[. feet
SEWfC WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY SELF
Ci RAY 04TFr-
4
07
•
CALCULATED BY DATE
CHECKED BY DATE
NdLIA�I IS,ge9enIM11�1 ®a4x. Wen, Ym 01111 io 6iW ggNF 1pLLflEf N0695ABB
Mou Aia i �
N 'sPuR K
Tawo OF 1
mf-( 7-d—
C/
0
Dt
CASt#1
.6 J-) Tc -v P'f-7y,'-,,Ir
C' T omA ,i I U
" RE UDI
RESE2vo1
';,jlpSr Sf,KvtCF' ppaP
- OVF—fZoA(:> Koa,>r
LEcFpo
br<tc>C�
•
S
Ll�
>Q
coryO
D
Q
� o
V/
O
c0 U r
O �
z �
o z
U �
63
W —
_ J
#342731 ()3/19/92 11:26 Rec K OO BK 672 PG 303
Silvia. Davis. Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc S-00
3C)
0
Q
Q
}
Z
Z)
0
u
0 0
P.O. Box 7006
Aspen, Colorado 81611
July 18, 1995
Betsey Kipp
Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Application for Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit
Hand Delivered
Dear Betsy:
Attached please find the above referenced application. Also attached is a copy of the
catalog page of the "cottage toilet" that we have ordered after I discussed the item with you.
The Centrex drain will be connected to our Sears Porta -potty that we have been using at the
property for the past five years. The tank on the Porta -potty has a gauge indicator, and we
will take the tank home for emptying into our toilet as we are currently doing. There will be
no drainage to the ground.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please let me know.
Thanks for your help.
Sincerely,
q" � k
Chuck Roth
L95.60
31
0
0
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (ISDS) PERMITS
GUIDELINES FOR THE 1994 SEASON
This bulletin and enclosed packet are to, provide information to anyone who owns,
builds, and inspects septic systems within Pitkin County, and to make it easier to
understand how the process works. Enclosed in this packet are the rules, regulations
and procedures that this department has adopted concerning Individual Sewage
Disposal System (ISDS) permits.
Major points in the packet include:
1. In order to obtain an ISDS permit, four things are required:
A. An ISDS permit application and the $150 fee,
B. Soil percolation test data using the enclosed Soil Data Form.
C. Site plans of proposed locations of structures, driveways, wells, ditches and
septic systems,
D. Proof of adequate water for the site (quantity and quality).
The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department will design the system for you as
part of the $150 fee, unless you need an engineered system, which we determine
based on your soil test results. You do not have to pay to have someone else design
the system unless an engineered system is required. The $150 fee also includes
processing the application, consulting with the applicant on the type of system best
suited for the site, locating the system, and inspections needed before, during and after
construction.
2 When your building permit application is received by this Department, the above four
items are required before the plans can be released back to the building department.
Once this information has been received and reviewed, the plans and building
permits will be approved and released back to the Building Department. It is the initial
responsibility of this Department to see that the site will have an effective sewage
disposal system before any construction begins. It is highly recommended that soil
and percolation tests be conducted as early as possible in the planning stages of the
project and that this Department has information regarding adequate domestic water
supply. This would ensure that the septic system will be placed and designed properly,
and allow for the rapid approval of building plans.
3. Building _plans will be processed by this office as quickly as possible. If we have all
the information we need (see above), we can usually sign the permit within 48 hours.
Approval of the ISDS system requires two inspections: the initial site visit is to determine
if the site is adequate for a septic system and that there are no potential hazards that
may interfere with the system. The second inspection is to determine if the system has
been installed properly. If conditions exist due to space and equipment constraints,
and parts of a system need to be back-filled prior to the final inspection, please contact
this office in advance to make arrangements for an additional inspection.
4. For properties that have inadequate soil percolation rates, high ground water, or
bedrock within eight feet of the surface, a licensed engineer must design the system
and submit the plans to this Department with the engineer's seal affixed. We will notify
you if this is required. After the system is installed, a letter from the engineer must be
received stating that the system was constructed according to plans. This letter is
required prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
5. Please make sure that the application has been completed and all requested
information has been provided. Incomplete applications slow the process and may
cause delays for a building project. Once a completed Application and Soils Data Form
has been received, an initial site inspection can be scheduled as previously described.
We recommend that everyone have a copy of the Pitkin County Regulations on
Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. This can be purchased through the Department
for $10.
Also, the State of Colorado ISDS guidelines were revised during the summer of 1994.
This action will result in the adoption of new Pitkin County ISDS regulations before the
1995 building season. Informational meetings and work sessions will be scheduled this
winter to discuss the impacts of these new regulations. All information will be
forwarded to interested parties as to the dates of any public hearings. Citizen input
is very important to this process and participation is encouraged.
Thank you very much for your cooperation this past season and future seasons. If
there are any questions feel free to call the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health
Department at 920-5070 or visit us on the second floor of City Hall, 130 S. Galena
Street., Aspen, CO 81611.
Sincerely,
V D_�
Thomas S. Dunlop, Director
Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department
0 0
ASPENJPMN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT
"INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS"
AIS PERMIT MUST BE ISSUED BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE OBTAINED. THE INITIAL SITE INSPECTION MUST BE ARRANGED WITH THE
'PEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF INSPECTION. FINAL INSPECTION APPROVAL
UST BE GIVEN BY THE ASPEN/PfTKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE BACKFILLING OF ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM.
SITE PLAN MUST BE FILED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
I
_EASE LOCATE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE SITE PLAN AND INDICATE MEASURED DISTANCES:
PROPERTY LINES AND DIMENSIONS
PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER WELLS ON THE PROPERTY AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES
DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE LINES
PROPOSED AND EXISTING BUILDINGS AND ROADWAYS
STREAMS, LAKES, PONDS, IRRIGATION DITCHES, AND OTHER WATER COURSES
PROPOSED AND EXISTING INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS ON THE PROPERTY AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES
UBMIT A REVISED SITE PLAN FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO EXCAVATION IF INSTALLATION IS TO BE CHANGED FROM THE ORIGINAL PLAN
GENERAL PROVISIONS OF AN
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
his permit must be retained and made available for inspection at the above location upon request
his permit shall not be transferred without approval of the issuing agency.
his permit shall expire 120 days after its issuance If construction has not commenced and a valid building permit has not been obtained. Any change in
.tans or specifications after the permit has been issued invalidates the permit, unless approval is secured from an Environmental'Health Officer for such
hanges.
his permit is temporary until final approval Is granted by the issuing agency in writing. Final approval cannot be granted until construction, repair, and/or
,peralion have occurred in conformity with the conditions of this permit This permit is valid only for the individual sewage disposal system and/or equipment
pacifically identified herein.
iefore issuing final approval of this permit, the issuing agency reserves the right to Impose conditional terms and conditions required to meet its applicable
egulations on a continuing basis. Monitoring and testing requirements may also be imposed. The issuing officer shall be notified not less than 24 hours
nior to backfilling or closing up the work which would prevent inspection of components Installed in places otherwise inaccessible following such backfilling
r closure.
'his permit may be revoked or suspended by the issuing agency for reasons set forth in the regulations of said agency or of the State Board of Health, as
applicable, including failure to meet any term or condition imposed thereon during temporary approval or upon final approval.
=ach and every condition of this permit is a material part hereof and is not severable. Any challenge to, or appeal of, a condition hereof shall constitute a
ejection of the entire permit and upon such occurrence this permit shall be deemed denied ab initio.
his permit is issued and accepted with the understanding that a fee in the amount of $_ may be charged for each of no more than two annual effluent
samples routinely collected and tested from subject system as deemed necessary by the issuing agency to monitor said system for compliance with the
'rovisions of Article 10, Title 25, C.R.S. 1973, as amended, and the rules and regulations which implement said Article; and that a like fee may be charged
or each such sampling taken in conjunction with the determination of compliance of subject system with a cease and desist order issued pursuant to C.R.S.
1973, Section 25-10-107(1)(k).
fhe issuance of this permit does not imply compliance with other state or local regulatory or building requirement, nor shall it act to certify that the subject
system will operate in compliancd with applicable state and local regulations adopted pursuant to Article 10 of Title 25, C.R.S. 1973, as amended, except for
:he purposes of establishing final approval of an installed system for Issuance of a local occupancy permit pursuant to C.R.S. 1973, 2510.111(2).
'ROTH..UODJTCPC:wP.PERMIr.a 1
100 SOUTH GALENA STREET ': ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 - PHONE 009.920.5070 . FAX 001920.5197
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
ASPEN¢PITKIIV
ENVIRO(*ENTAL HEALTH OEPARTNWIT
APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND INFORMATION FOR
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (ISDS) PERMITS
General Information
The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department may be reached at (303) 920-5070 between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The mailing address is 130 South Galena,
Aspen, Colorado, 81611. Any questions concerning your septic system permit will be answered in a
timely matter.
A building lot must comply with three broad requirements before the permit of a conventional system
can be issued. These requirements are as follows:
1. satisfactory soil percolation test,
2. satisfactory soil profile test hole,
3. and minimum setback distance requirements (as provided in this packet)
Soil Percolation Test
The percolation (perc) test enables the Environmental Health Department to determine the capacity of
the soil to adsorb liquids. This provides the standards for sizing a leach field.
Perc tests must be certified by a professional engineer registered by the State of Colorado.
Homeowners and contractors are prohibited by Colorado Law from conducting these tests themselves.
When the perc tests are conducted by a Registered Professional Engineer, the results must be
submitted on the same format as the attached form and properly signed and stamped with an
Engineer's seal.
Percolation tests must be run in at least three holes inside the proposed leach field area. These holes
need to be staked and numbered for easy identification.
The perc test holes must be at the same depth as the proposed leach field; if the site is on a hillside
the uphill holes must be deeper than the downhill holes. See Figure 3 for a description of perc test
holes.
Perc test holes must be pre-soaked, filled with water several times, for a minimum of eight hours prior
to running the test. Pre-soaking is vital to obtaining accurate results in the percolation test.
Soil Profile Hole
The soil profile test hole enables the Environmental Health Department to determine if groundwater,
bedrock, impervious clay layers, etc., exist in the area of the proposed leach field. These conditions
may cause problems with the functioning of the leach field. If any conditions do exist that may interfere
with a conventional system, an engineered design system may be required. The soil profile hole is a
large hole eight feet deep and is usually dug with a backhoe. This hole must be properly barricaded
immediately after it is excavated to prevent accidents.
,�5 130 Sooth Galen. Street A.pen, Colorado 61611 303/926-5070
�m�aao+or.
The soil profile hole must meet the following requirements
1. It must be at least eight feet deep, or to bedrock, but at least four feet deeper than the proposed
leach field.
2. It must be large enough in diameter to permit visual observation of the soil strata at all levels.
3. It must be located not closer than four feet nor farther than ten feet from the proposed leach field.
This test hole must be inspected by Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department personnel. Soil logs
developed by qualified soil engineers will be accepted in lieu of this inspection if the Department has
given approval.
Some portions of Pitkin County exhibit seasonally high water tables. In these areas the Environmental
Health Department inspection can only be made during maximum groundwater level periods (usually
May 15th through June 15th). If inspections are made in these areas at other times of the year, a
system may be installed that will not function properly. Please contact the Environmental Health
Department if you believe there is a high water table on the building site.
Minimum Distance Requirements
Individual sewage disposal system components must be adequately separated from water supplies,
streams, buildings, property lines, etc. to prevent contamination, building settling, and other potential
problems. These distances are located in Table 2
Site Inspections
The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department makes at least two site inspections (initial site
inspection and final inspection) on each individual sewage disposal system. These inspections are
described in detail later. If a specific system were to require more inspections, arrangements should
be made in advance with this Department.
Initial Site Inspection: Initial site inspections enable the Department to determine if a conventional
system will function properly on a building site. This inspection must be done prior to issuing an [SDS
permit. Before requesting an initial site inspection, the following must be completed:
1. soil percolation tests certified by a registered professional engineer,
2. a soil profile hole must be excavated and available for inspection by Department staff,
3. all components of the system as well as proposed buildings, wells, water lines, and property lines
must be staked out on the property,
a. and the Department must have a copy of the competed application and all fees must be paid.
Arrangements for initial site inspections should be made at least two working days in advance of the
requested inspection time.
Final Inspection: Final inspections enable the Environmental Health Department to determine if the
components of the system are properly installed and if the permit conditions have been met.
Before reque9ting a final inspection the following conditions must exist:
1. The individual sewage disposal system must be completely installed. If the Department must make
more than one final inspection because the system was not completely installed, charges may be
made for extra inspection fees. All fees are outlined in Table 1. If a phased inspection schedule
is necessary, however, no additional charges will be made it arrangements have been made -in
2
0 0
advance with the Environmental Health Department,
2. All components of the system must be exposed so that they may be inspected. Do not backfill
any portion of the system prior to final inspection.
Arrangements for final inspections should be made at least two working days in advance of the
requested inspection time to allow for the most efficient planning.
Problem Situations
Several conditions may prohibit the installation of a conventional sewage disposal system or require the
system to be designed by a registered professional engineer. These conditions include but are not
limited to the following:
1. unsatisfactory soil perc results (either too fast or too slow),
2. high groundwater table,
3. insufficient depth of suitable soil,
4. minimum distance requirements cannot be met,
5. or slopes in excess of thirty percent (30%).
If any of these conditions exist an engineer designed system must be submitted to the Department
stamped with a certified engineers seal. A final letter stating that the system was constructed according
to design must also be submitted by the engineer after the system is complete. Please contact the
Department for information on alternative systems or possible solutions which may be available.
Septic Tanks and Dosing Systems
Septic tanks are usually constructed of concrete, fiberglass, or plastic. Each material has advantages
and disadvantages. The Environmental Health Department or hired contractor can outline the specifics
of each. Metal is not an acceptable material for septic tank construction as it corrodes easily. The
minimum septic tank size allowed in Pitkin County is seven hundred and fifty (750) gallons. All tanks
must have two compartments. Each compartment must have a manhole with a diameter of at least
twenty (20) inches allowing access into it. This is an important item for the maintenance of the tank.
Passive or active dosing systems allow sewage to flow into the leach field during intervals throughout
the day. This periodic dosing of the leach field has shown to extend the life of the field and provide
better distribution of the entire field area. The Environmental Health Department recommends the use
of these devices where possible.
Maintenance of an ISDS
Home owners should exercise care in how they use their individual sewage disposal systems. Solid
material (particularly from the garbage disposal) should be kept to a minimum. With periodic
maintenance and reasonable use the septic system should last a long time.
Septic Tanks: The primary function of a septic tank is to remove solids from the sewage. This is a
primarily physical process of settling, although some biological decomposition does occur. The solids
that accumulate in the tank need to be removed periodically or they will be carried into the leach field
and cause possible malfunction.
Septic tanks should be checked annually to determine the volume of solids in the tank. To facilitate
this process, Pitkin County regulations require that tank lids be no deeper than the ground surface on
all recently constructed systems. Since 1973 the Department has made drawings of each system as
57
it was installed. These drawings are on file and can be made available upon request for assistance
in locating septic tanks and fields. A nominal fee must be charged for such copies.
Actual inspection of solids accumulation is the only way to determine if the tank needs to be pumped.
The septic tank must first be located and the lid of the first compartment removed. A layer of grease
and scum will be floating on top of the water in the tank. This is a normal situation. The grease layer
is fairly resistant to penetration but a hole must be made for access to the water below. To check the
solids accumulation a long stick with rough white cloth attached to it is lowered into the first
compartment of the tank until contact is made with the tank bottom (Figure 1). Solids will adhere to
the white cloth and the depth can be measured once the stick is removed. When the depth of the
solids Is 50% of the water depth in the tank, the tank should be pumped. An alternative to this process
is to pump the tank every year or every two years. This ensures that solids are not accumulating.
Prior to pumping, make sure both compartment lids are uncovered and to have both compartments
pumped.
Absorption Fields: The primary function of an absorption field is to evenly distribute septic tank effluent
through an area of soil that will filter the sewage water as it moves through the soil.
Most conventional leach field require no maintenance. Occasionally, even with proper installations and
septic tank maintenance, leach fields will fail to work property. Commonly this is due to a biological
clogging layer that is formed with the use of a system over a period of time. When this situation
occurs, sewage will either back up into the house or be discharged onto the surface of the ground.
In the past a malfunctioning leach field required the installation of a new system. Recent technological
developments now make it possible to treat some systems which are malfunctioning or to do simple
repair work to the system. Please contact a contractor or this Department for information op failing
systems.
The Application Process
The ISDS application gives the Department information about the house to be built. From this data it
can be determined where the property is and how much sewage might be produced from the home
on a daily basis.
Graph paper can be used for the site plan if desired. This site plan enables the Department to
determine if any minimum distance problems exist before time is devoted to a site inspection. The
contractor will also use this information to construct the system. A sample plot plan is included in this
package (Figure 2). The sample shows the type of information and the detail needed on the plat plan
and is included on the application. Also included is Table 2 showing minimum setback distances.
Tables 3, 4, and 5 are included for additional information on sizing tanks and fields.
The Soil Data Form is attached for the soil percolation results. Please make sure the engineer stamps
this page with a registered seal.
t++t***++***#**t*+t**#*+*****++t+t*rt**+#+**#+t*x+tt*#+#t*##****#*#***+#t***#******xxt+***++
Please make sure that the application has been filled out completely and all requested information is
provided. Incomplete applications can not be processed and will cause a delay in the issuing of an
ISDS permit.
+##*++****t***#*++***#t+*+t#*#t#t*#**##*t##+****##*t+#****tt*##***##*t+t***+#*#+****+**+*##t
...TCPCMPPERMR.D.APP.MFOADS
SIR
• C
TABLE 11
TABLE OF MINIMUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCES IN
FEET BETWEEN COMPONENTS OF A SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
AND PERTINENT PHYSICAL FEATURES
24
I
3i
spiny Wear Artini
D&u%Water
Dm gWale.
Owe90n9
Pmpvty[Jv d.a0.
LAW.le.caurse.
Dry
Sept
Ih.0
supply
supply Cu
Occupied BuSWq
tan. Piped, tLw
hmp. Ditd.m
Gu1dw
T.Wh
lire
intm.dttmllnigatian
Steam
Dik
AFaapton Trt.ch` "ge 0ei,5and
FJx.,5u6-sW.a�Dupe Sy. M.
to
m
(2)
a
a
20
10
50
a
6
SacP.p Rt
(n
RI
100
5o
a
20
a
50
a
6
Ii.rd Ev.pm., p..t Held.lord
Wubrrte. Pad
60
10
a
15
10
a
10
5
UWinedaPa fiyuhed
Ev.pob Wi..m sys W.shv+
100
Pad, a Sud. Dispos System Other
(1)
a
a
15
10
a
is
10
tun Mmol
Tined S.WFOte.
60
10
a
15
10
a
10
5
lj u Sud HW m sot With. Pert
Rats Rowe tun 60 hld prt Kh
100
a
a
is
10
a
15
10
System U.vg Ael.d Wd d
100
m
(2)
10
50
la
10
a
10
10
V.Wt Prig
10
a
15
10
a
10
-
SO
Septic Tanls.Trtam.ent Pl.nb, Dav'B
(1)
10
-
TankxVaWb
SO
a
5
10
50
10
Hllua0liro
50
10
a
0
10
50
10
-
24
I
3i
FIGURE 2
AMPLE SITEPLAN
NO
COUNTY ROAD
227' pxiveway -
LOT 13
Unimproved
_ YY°P°sed
No Well
•. H°use -
Well3 0' Well
o�proposed
to p 1 pert y Septic
'Tank
ting
Use - y �' 80 r
N £KO'P°sea
N
5-p- o£ ee -
f a One °dation
60' Pe St bOle s
_ to
Profile SO p£
Test Hole `
3--1'1 1'- \Y
LOT 11 LOT 12
• 2.4 Acres 208' - /
LOT 43
Unimproved
No Well
i
_--.Stredm�-�"� LOT 44 1
No Wcll
Yo
ACCEFTAOIE PERCOLATION TEST HOLE EXCAVATIOIIS•
B.ekhoe \
eac.v.tcd \/
por c to.
Hand dug or drilled ccsc .Band dog or drilled
hole.
12" .+a xi.. di.metec. Tot.l ccsc portion. V minimum
to ch. ..-: depth .. the
hole depth eo dcpch, 12" ri.L.
bottom of the absorption sme dcpch a di.meeee
field :tern: of
absorption field
PERCOLATIal TEST HOLES ON FLAT TERRAIN
n n
Noce: all holes viehin staked boondrie., all holes to the same depth
PERCOLATION TEST OGLES ON STEEP TERRAIN
Hoce: all holes c.iehin staked boundrlet, holes of different
depth. due to alope bot ail ereend to the bottom of
,he .b•.,pei.. field, holes dug vfrh''a`'c ec.M n.cton of
\— of .ceept.bl. me Ehods
0 0
P.O. Box 7006
Aspen, Colorado 81611
December I8, 1995
Ms. Betsey Kipp
Aspen Pitkin Environmental Health Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81612 Hand Delivered
Dear Betsey:
I have completed building our cabin to the requirements of the Building Department, your
office, and our lender.
Attached are photographs showing the backfill of the leach field, the backfill in the septic
tank structure, the bathe for and in the septic tank, and the piping and connections from the
septic tank to the infiltrators.
Tom requested documentation concerning the summer use of the cabin and the non -
winterized water and drain pipes. Attached is a copy of the appraisal that was the basis for
our construction loan. The appraisal is not clear on this issue. On page 4 are circled
statements concerning plywood floors, unfinished drywall walls, and exterior plywood
walls. On page 5 is circled "functional utility - unfinished." On page 6 are circled
comparable number 4 and no central heating. Comparable number 4 is further discussed as
circled on page 10. On page 8 is circled a paragraph discussing upgrades and finish
features. AlthoughMe appraisal is not clear concerning the non -winterized water and drain
pipe system, this was verbally agreed between myself and the lender. It has been approved
by the Building Department, a copy of which is attached. I will be satisfied with a
certificate of occupancy which states "summer cabin - water and drain pipes not
winterized." The issue of non -winterized pipes is between myself and my lender. However
if you wish me to obtain additional information from our lender, please let me know.
We need our certificate of occupancy as soon as possible in order to meet the terms of our
construction loan and to enter into our permanent financing. If you need any additional
information, please let me know at your earliest convenience.
Thanks for your help.
Sincerely,
%Or — 9-4&
Chuck Roth
ioD(
L95.98
0 0
ASPEN40PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado B161 1 970/920-5090
i
BUILDING INSPECTION CHECK LIST
Inspection 1`
p � Reinspection Partial Complete Permit No.
❑ STEEL (REBAR)
❑ ELECTRIC
7PLUMBING
❑ MECHANICAL
❑ BUILDING
Footings
Constr. Service —
Underground
Rough —
R -Frame —
Cassions
Underground
Waste & Vent
Flue(s)
Insulation
Wall
Rough
Water Pipe -'_
Gas Log
Drywall
Wall Cores
Perm. Service
Gas Pipe
Combust. Air
Special —
Struc. Slabs
Final
Final
Ventilation
Mobile Home
Pads
Bonding
Fire Sprinklers
Kitch. Hood
Final
Piers
Special
Final
Bond Beam
— —
Accepted E]Accepted as Noted ❑ Rejected ❑ Reinspection Fee $
❑ You are required to make the following corrections on the construction which is now in progress.
' Contact Fire Marshal for sprinkler inspection.
Instructions to Inspector:
DESCRIPTION: # Levels _ Garage: Att. Det. CarportDecks
Entry Foyer _ Bedrooms Full Baths _'/A Baths _'/z Baths Kitchen — Dining _ Living _ Family/Rec
Media Room _ Library — Office/Study Exercise Rm. _ Solarium/Greenhouse —Storage Laundry _ Mech.
Mud Room Sitting Room Den Breakfast Nook
Other:
Fireplace: Make Model # G
Address
Subdivision V J
Contractor `
Owner
as Appliance: Make Model #
Contact Phone OO
Request Recd. I– �'!_S AME NAME
Request for M ; T` W• .7H F_ pA. P.M. -Tune =--
Date Insp.peadP
a. z�
SECTION 21, T 8 S., R. 83 W. of the 6th P.M.
4 PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
i..
MINOR 1041 HAZARD
REVIEW
PLAT FOR
ROTH
2(v
7ga cG
C, .3
WHITE RIVER NATIONAL -ORE5T
AFp(jC1F[6' aeat': fh,iI S E. I. I" ANO ". N. .
i. M1rrpinq eMll b aY or l«e 11, Ir«lent
a. 111 dnga Mall M Mnneled o[ ,...has.
1, .1. vyars". eMil he aintnl«d L.L. of [M nuildlM
.ovslOP.
{. millt1« Mail M place Yoder to et11t1M read an" prep«
ae
1"Vesef.
9. a 0+5viawant M pnleMa wtalee of tM MI101M eew3hw.
•. The +pplta+n[ atoll 1,w les a ward or Wjoetwnt vtllants
wler tp Ma ld1M w«}t lass t.
Wktw
yyllseat w1. Let Pa that .,/.he be. w+1, lofornad
Chunky of the axiscan's of •Ina1 Na«rd "es. ^ tret..10, SK«t
the wewr{y. wow INKoveantn .M ea we she x.«wmry tt�aeet.
epprese 1041 w«[d avlw 1,Y:
N t
yk: .J
This teal se, . been +pe«tse for f11iw 1. tows, slot« of one
e
flvr and .'", .f %thin Cea.at,. Calofad+. w flat.
a+y _a[ ' w A.Inky I. net Ptak 'o Iwe
•r
2S «s. '9Fi`4}
yc/
VICINITY MAP
®
Saq,xain9 at a point front shen0a Wa Sonthwastarly .near of the
'hrnel Mara OwtL 63 90' east 4, feet:
tient. Perri I Ia
.. er a0 fast,
fiance . f rediw 30 fast, of 55 301• and L Of 44.111
last with a r9otd Cea[SM artL 52 90' Lot 42 feeta
fissure on .[ Insists 111-5 fast, n[ 36 r art L of 51.1
last, vita s offend mriM 5»N n 40 Met .1 fat:
tl:eMehours67 50' lass: 212 fes:
lienee North a9 51'+a• east 300 last to the w1M of aelinsi ..
onteiniM app[vleataly 19. 921 equera [at (0.46 arra) sora of
less.
/ ` ♦LiLffoaar- *'T
I__
r _
so Fleed phis ran. fl 15« - taro th « raiskin suetyfloodthan
\ aappiM for this +fee. paeti« 5-402 of the of 5 atony lode
\ \ [yeif'ho «ontal fro a,rt1M high vet« its re 1 vertiml East
\ 30 M[Szmtvl feat. Mlch+ver l+M eras Se greater.
\ a. Ae tapagrawle II— era tra»p«td Ira the Pit"l1, County
I�L.R.eF"f.ip11g0 \ ', tapq[ewic Ira o[ }wnehlp f Short, p3 seat, Lo. as al,
a Haut a[ L•M [n tons as V. as I'.. � \ an file at that hapee/pltkln plannlrq Office.
factlM .1, :pf I. }b applicant will apply for fro
ant he frt Vera
rmnlNllp [ +south• Setback front 100 fast to 30 fear.
Vaasa a7 a•• a1 the are I.e., �5S/
«/e wLtlesinly aaao[tM0 as fall.,
Low IM anter In the rester of the 1[bth .[k of that
rtvats, oa Southerly IInS f la / {. future parkingarea after anceae [b
E fa awelowa across
FryI
VN Ll w Ma• forest Sa[vi« lands it eplican['S "Local.. «aIpMinpiersa«preaorly
w[kea
Ise W "oh" t se. ea «L earLLee 11 seats arth +2.91.27•
bt 1.112.11, fast,
there.• wore. [T •f a'U• aset aa9.a fpr siert ..I...IV it..
at
«M as 1/r as 1/a to • plot lA the oast« or thatart; , Me
Revel.
Shari arta a[•tp'hn• east I"... feet Siwe 0M rsnNr of ata
a1
f1ire,+ a[en a•,2'•+• ani
[Mt [bra tha e.oa aid
rles[ .. IrolLm In es a«Lasf " said "he's, are o1 Lee
[ry1M
to Riv«:
mane. turn 61.15'w• sae 1,9. as reef .1" that seer, sone or
sake North ,orb
aMrs• aN ta•la•, f• [we 4".. fast .tow LM c..t.t tine .r
a3a worth rota to the wits e7 tpiaraw.
e 'artiflcdu
t. ..tl. I. wen ILL. eo ar.ty r«t,r, . I »l.rea
s
wow tinlie,Med uM.r theM 1m n[ t$.is or foists... r«M
thea
Nb it. 7"m1. z tree. e.rart am 'healers z,M pla:1 of a
Nlar that enzera Psvaw »+e«1, Mr+wa. Chat [M SI I al.n a»
»as Ire . snorter of w real property d»cr,lred Mzan, sold
that fes Sate also ..LL sons. [M I"atlm nM QSaw1one of
the M,Idiaq ...laps.
In %mr. ener«t I Mw s« y MM the se.1 Wit ?IV", of
A[f4//��//�� A.O. 19.14.
i.0M2flI' �• �n�y/-� .
y: i
chert.. wen ... e. a. aaahl
1. L»fe Is so direct vesicular access to CM euildioq site.
L+sra[nrs, this 1041 application le for an R-3 l,a1tM occur
ettactuie.
a. Loa suns, u,om with this pop as Msrd vas petforsed on
Bepteaher 15. 1151 It, So— f NSlker. I.-
7. 6k1st1M former Srnice ifwrlel has Permit for vM3celar
aavasa [1111» saistlM vahloni" read art rhetwet b
prlprrty tosedezy. Lprnvaante to agnea r«ulr. I1r«t 5.Ni«
apptwal.
MINGf. IC41 HA-AFG liifVit.t./
'IiE F! AN PoF. ROT"
I.67=A^M_FAFCEL IN Nw'A. NW'A
`.E,:7'_I , T. t `., A.8' W. 1,i the 'o IL F.M.
PITKIN COt N'*Y, COLOFACO
GHACI-E` `_. F_CTl, S 'P.F. ?04G7)
F.C. p 19 ICcat Y. Ftwl cckX` ACG
ILz -ac9r
rot r 5t ALG 1• .
F 1632
I P
17
-r
=
, r,.
VICINITY MAP
®
Saq,xain9 at a point front shen0a Wa Sonthwastarly .near of the
'hrnel Mara OwtL 63 90' east 4, feet:
tient. Perri I Ia
.. er a0 fast,
fiance . f rediw 30 fast, of 55 301• and L Of 44.111
last with a r9otd Cea[SM artL 52 90' Lot 42 feeta
fissure on .[ Insists 111-5 fast, n[ 36 r art L of 51.1
last, vita s offend mriM 5»N n 40 Met .1 fat:
tl:eMehours67 50' lass: 212 fes:
lienee North a9 51'+a• east 300 last to the w1M of aelinsi ..
onteiniM app[vleataly 19. 921 equera [at (0.46 arra) sora of
less.
/ ` ♦LiLffoaar- *'T
I__
r _
so Fleed phis ran. fl 15« - taro th « raiskin suetyfloodthan
\ aappiM for this +fee. paeti« 5-402 of the of 5 atony lode
\ \ [yeif'ho «ontal fro a,rt1M high vet« its re 1 vertiml East
\ 30 M[Szmtvl feat. Mlch+ver l+M eras Se greater.
\ a. Ae tapagrawle II— era tra»p«td Ira the Pit"l1, County
I�L.R.eF"f.ip11g0 \ ', tapq[ewic Ira o[ }wnehlp f Short, p3 seat, Lo. as al,
a Haut a[ L•M [n tons as V. as I'.. � \ an file at that hapee/pltkln plannlrq Office.
factlM .1, :pf I. }b applicant will apply for fro
ant he frt Vera
rmnlNllp [ +south• Setback front 100 fast to 30 fear.
Vaasa a7 a•• a1 the are I.e., �5S/
«/e wLtlesinly aaao[tM0 as fall.,
Low IM anter In the rester of the 1[bth .[k of that
rtvats, oa Southerly IInS f la / {. future parkingarea after anceae [b
E fa awelowa across
FryI
VN Ll w Ma• forest Sa[vi« lands it eplican['S "Local.. «aIpMinpiersa«preaorly
w[kea
Ise W "oh" t se. ea «L earLLee 11 seats arth +2.91.27•
bt 1.112.11, fast,
there.• wore. [T •f a'U• aset aa9.a fpr siert ..I...IV it..
at
«M as 1/r as 1/a to • plot lA the oast« or thatart; , Me
Revel.
Shari arta a[•tp'hn• east I"... feet Siwe 0M rsnNr of ata
a1
f1ire,+ a[en a•,2'•+• ani
[Mt [bra tha e.oa aid
rles[ .. IrolLm In es a«Lasf " said "he's, are o1 Lee
[ry1M
to Riv«:
mane. turn 61.15'w• sae 1,9. as reef .1" that seer, sone or
sake North ,orb
aMrs• aN ta•la•, f• [we 4".. fast .tow LM c..t.t tine .r
a3a worth rota to the wits e7 tpiaraw.
e 'artiflcdu
t. ..tl. I. wen ILL. eo ar.ty r«t,r, . I »l.rea
s
wow tinlie,Med uM.r theM 1m n[ t$.is or foists... r«M
thea
Nb it. 7"m1. z tree. e.rart am 'healers z,M pla:1 of a
Nlar that enzera Psvaw »+e«1, Mr+wa. Chat [M SI I al.n a»
»as Ire . snorter of w real property d»cr,lred Mzan, sold
that fes Sate also ..LL sons. [M I"atlm nM QSaw1one of
the M,Idiaq ...laps.
In %mr. ener«t I Mw s« y MM the se.1 Wit ?IV", of
A[f4//��//�� A.O. 19.14.
i.0M2flI' �• �n�y/-� .
y: i
chert.. wen ... e. a. aaahl
1. L»fe Is so direct vesicular access to CM euildioq site.
L+sra[nrs, this 1041 application le for an R-3 l,a1tM occur
ettactuie.
a. Loa suns, u,om with this pop as Msrd vas petforsed on
Bepteaher 15. 1151 It, So— f NSlker. I.-
7. 6k1st1M former Srnice ifwrlel has Permit for vM3celar
aavasa [1111» saistlM vahloni" read art rhetwet b
prlprrty tosedezy. Lprnvaante to agnea r«ulr. I1r«t 5.Ni«
apptwal.
MINGf. IC41 HA-AFG liifVit.t./
'IiE F! AN PoF. ROT"
I.67=A^M_FAFCEL IN Nw'A. NW'A
`.E,:7'_I , T. t `., A.8' W. 1,i the 'o IL F.M.
PITKIN COt N'*Y, COLOFACO
GHACI-E` `_. F_CTl, S 'P.F. ?04G7)
F.C. p 19 ICcat Y. Ftwl cckX` ACG
ILz -ac9r
rot r 5t ALG 1• .
F 1632
I P
.11vv ..1(14
'TOTAL' a00raisal wf wom by a Is mole. Im. 1 (800) 828.6825 _�
0 O.._ nAC nc •
June 20, 1994
Peak Appraisal Service
0024 Deer Run
Carbondale, CO 81623
Howard Cohen
Aspen mortgage Capital
115 Ptarmigan Ct .
Basalt, CO 81621
Dear Mr. Cohen,
Pursuant to your request, we have prepared an appraisal report of the property
captioned in the "Summary of Salient Features" which follows.
The accompanying report is based on a site inspection of improvements,
investigation of the subject neighborhood area of influence, and review of
sales, cost, and income data for similar properties.
This appraisal has been made with particular attention paid to applicable
value -influencing economic conditions and has been processed in accordance
with nationally recognized appraisal guidelines.
The value conclusions stated herein are as of the effective date as stated in
the body of the appraisal, and contingent upon the certification and limiting
conditions attached.
Please do not hesitate to contact me or any of my staff if we can be of
additional service to you.
Respectfully,
S.F. Ebert, SRA
Colorado CR00001767
sfe
"TOTAL" apPaisal WhWata try a la mpM, Imp.. 1 (AM) 7288825
2
0 0 0
SUMMARY OF SALIENT FEATURES
Subject Address 26810 Frying Pan Road
Legal Description Section 21, Township 8 South, Range 83 west
City Meredith
County Pitkin
State Co
Zip Code 81642
Census Tract 0000.00
Map Reference 0000.00
Sale Price $ N/A
Date of Sale N/A
Borrower / Client Ro'rii
Lender Aspen Mortgage capital
Size (Square Feet)
975
Price per Square Foot
$
Location
Rural/Ave
Age
New
Condition
New
Total Rooms
5
Bedrooms
3
Baths
0
Appraiser S.F. FDert, SRA
Date of Appraised Value 6-19-94
Final Estimate of Value $ 140,000
'TOTAI" . r -i - ,i A !40w3re by a la nia k, m-,., 1 (8001 3 28 4825
3
Property Description
File No.
947 -
Freddie Mac Form TO 990
y0'
'TOTAL" d spowpna try a is mn k-. iv; 1900 ALAMOVE
PAGE 1 01 -
Farb Mor Farm Ids 693
4
COYMpir�jl.sh �1 SOM W
Property Address 26810 r�T,ngr_s-.P,,,,..y
mss,
Legal Oafplp5on Se tion 21,�ship $_-Sovt t.,�ilg�a.3-NeAsrMes
Pweal No. - 12-00-006 Taayaar.1993R.ETasas Ir a Wil Speciwnrets a
Bo parr Current Ownnr Opwpana Own-nant Vacant
50000.
Props dpnu appmisd FN Senpb Leasehdd Tpe PUD CarldemYarrm pNONA
•�..
lgnbpfnppd RalaranosQ
Ne ar ProIM Nam$ Meredl
sus--_—__._
safe Pdoe s N A Dm of ssb�j Wscrbtion ane f emounI al ban plarpYmrwfabllf b D• ad b saw
- }'�-____.-- rte'..., CoLenderA;MM A,�ll MOYtC1aC�Q._apita,1._--.__. ArMpess _ry�su.1Pigla s_ss�asalt
ams +s'iQ�aO
.::
]
Appaber Address 00 4 b-- e Colorado
i
Location
u,ban
suW,bsn
Rural
Predominant
:
Single family housing
AGE
Present land use %
Chan
Land use Chan e
Bull up
Owr TS%
2S -T5%
Under 25%
Occupancy
_
PRICE
S(000) (Yrs)
One lamly
Not Ake y
Growth rola
Raped
Slabb
slow
I x Owner 95%_.__50_
Low_--
24 rarely
-prones
Property "loss
Incesblg
Slable
Dopnbg
r Tommi
High
MuN•famly
To:
_
DamerlNwpy
Stgrbp
In blow
Over supply
Vanni (0.5%)
f radcong t
Opmmsrcw
Marks "a
UMW ]reps.
x
3-0 mm.
Owr a mos_
Vacdow, 5%1
150 0-3
Note: Race and the racial composition of the neighborhood are not appraisal factors.
Nelght»dapd boundaries and cncraderislln: yc__ dic-adClerlClUljl.-__
Faders dust aHW tie markelabaly of pro properties b to neighborhood (po.Anlly b "PbYmsnl and SmeNlbs, ampbym$M Nabary, appal b marW4 $b.l:
.0
0`.
att Ld ed-addenclLml. -- --.--
0
-See
C
— - - --
Martel ooMlWns In Se wbjed neighborhood (IModkV supped tot the above mncW ions M1310J 10 ma band of p'aprty vaWas, demandtfuppry, and maAsng an$ - such as data m
'i
ca rpoe" propertlef M sale In tie relghbornood, description of the pmvaknr:a of sales and Iinandng mnces;bns, tib.):
See attaCbe denckimis--
Project Information for PUDs (II applbable) is IM dewbpwn uiklar In control of IM Home Owners' Assodolbn (HOA)? YH No
ApwosFnale bW number of units In IM subject project _— _-_ ADproabnale lobl number of uMu for Nb In Sb subject p W
::
Desalts$ pommos elements and recreational IUIDees:
•I
ri
TYYPg11aY - Site C17n_ �7tY-______s_
TopoW.phYDimensions JTsc,1 to gentle SZQe
Meares .87 + Comsat Lol
-
_
SpatlfcronkgdasWbaonand desalption Besidential __ __
Shap TrrFryLTlar Tr;aMle
_----.—
Zadry wmpaano, �( Legal 7Legal nonconbrmin0 (Gladlamerpd use) L� Regal I No zodng
Drainage �aa�jpear5 admuat
al S best use of blpowd: Preserd on I Ober use IasMabl
View _L1f ns, River, WXda
Landsupl'W Ttt37gell ) to a1=
yy1
Utilities Pubo
ore,
Off-site Improvements Type
Puplk
Pdwb
EYavidy
4
$bear BlaCktW
Dr.-"'TSudapDirt
o
'.,
Gal
Nolle
Cutb/guna, Notre
Apparent ."wants-Subjert
'--
NQnP
Wele,
Sld W.N NOne_
FEMA Special Fiend Hazwd Ansa Yea No
S.Mery sewer
Street sghls
FEMA Zone x Map Dab ���
•
Sbml aarwrNorva
May One
FEMA Map No.
Comments (appeumm adwne ossamanb, onuosWnenm. special assessments. sl%le areas. Regal or legal nonconforming zoning use, at.):Sep- att&lied-
addendum.-.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION ESTERIOR DESCRIPTION FOUNDATION
BASEMENT
INSULATION
:
No. of Una, � Foundation G9IlCL-L't�_ Slab No
Area SQ. FL
Roof R-30
t
d
Esledon wag, rawl Space
orrl Yes
% FHYbd No_
Gating
E
No. of SbNf OnebFialP� - __. -- _ _--
-Harem
S.
Type (D$IIAn.) Eetache ool Sudam RQ1101-asp- Basement N9 --_
Ce" ane
Wass R_19
RDesign
IS") outlets A Dwnapls. Mane Sump Pump NQ
Wela Dnp
Fbw 1-19
:I
Esyynggrpppf$0 Window Type Slid,,. _._ Dampness No11eY�.derL
Floor
Nona
P'
-gQ
Ape NewSbmVSasena 7,herllo/No 5llwmenl None e-vid
Qdada EnvyMrleUNpewn
(Ym.)
Edge" Age (YM)1?W Manubdumd House None
e
0::
ROOMS
FO
aiWwn
_ Dan _
Famly sure.
- Ree_Rm. Bedrooms
a soft
OIMr
Ars By. FL
agreement
<
Larval 2
—1—
pi
MaroA area sbow, grade coMalmo 4 Rooms: 2 Bookoo 1 as a); 1.200Squiva, Feat of Geos Ll kV Area
R'
p:
INTERIOR Mated.wCondition
HEATING
KITCHEN EOUIP._
ATTIC
-
AMENITIES
CAR STORAGE: Yes
-v,
n
p�^^� t
Type-BaSe�A.
na"'Our
I
None_X
Freptsce(s)a
Norse El
M
Web UatinT�
ural E.l,
nanp/Own
Sla'as
Palle AQnp
Garage Solan
Condition (3QQd
Dhlosal
Drop alas
Dock N«�
Aeapwd
TMVFWfh
COOLING None
N'.
Batls Fbar
Dlsnvresher
Scullb
Ports [.Ione
Datspbd
5
Bare Wsbecol Nme
Cereal -
FarvHood
Floor
Fence _NcIne
BV61n
DeanHo11ar •! nrp
Oebr _
M1,IL:'owaw
Healed
Pool NQ
Carport
Condition
WeLravDryer
FMIshed
Message
Additional features (spedel energy efr WnI items, eb.I: aee._attEic ecu. cidclenClLl)t)._-___
yµ'
F"
CArNaon of tib Ynprowmanb. depredation (Mysfnl, IUMbnal, and eabma0, ropsks needeJ, Quality of ponaaucibn, nmodeklp/additions, a10.: See
M(
attached addend mt ----- -------------.-- --.
' T-
Adwgo am60M1anlal conditions (such as, bul nor kneed b. hazardous xasts, bvk waalwKef. ek.) pnsenl In "e sap mamma, on tie she. Or In Ne fnmod44 NdNly of M
None or
wblad poprty: .known .disclosed_to .appraiser..--,
Freddie Mac Form TO 990
y0'
'TOTAL" d spowpna try a is mn k-. iv; 1900 ALAMOVE
PAGE 1 01 -
Farb Mor Farm Ids 693
4
Vawatlon Section
947— G
UNIF R`.s;DENTIAL APPRAISAL REAWT FIIE No.
'
0
P.
P
ESTIMATED SITE VALUE .... ............ . - Y
ESTIMATED REPRODUCTION COST -NEW -OF IMPROVEMENTS:
uw.abp ,]•, 200 so. Ft. os 62_00 • s 7! ,_400
F1.
Wood stone 1, 500
Gwa9wCwW 84. FI. of --
Total ESIMsled Cost Now ....................... • 6 __75, 90O
Comments on Cost broach (such as, source of c esbmalo, site
Value, Square toot calculation and for HUD, VA and FmHA, the
estimated remaining Iiia of the property): �g
R
Lia
A
C
5
LOU Physical Funcd*nd Edemtl
D.pr.d.aon I 3,225 ---- - --- '-- '795
_
DOPreaaled Value of llnp ls"rNi s .................. ... - S 72.,.105_
"APN' Vabe of Slee ImPrO"rNMs .. .... S_ _— 4., 15_00
-------
—
::'
INDICATED VALUE BY COST APPROACH ............... 101 105
REM SUBJECT
COMPARABLE NO.1
COMPARABLE NO.2
COMPARABLE NO.3
26810 Frying Pan Roa
201 Wa iii Way
121 W. Homestead Dr
409 Cottoisocod lan
Mer
Jit.1,,�%}/y/j77 RttrdliSlO"e$
es
<U1l!/StLll/
Public Record
et�e�s&BOUiK�S=�
-Basalt
_Address
ProaMRb y Subject
Sales tarts
Pala/Oros: w. Are,
i
Af24t
Lir 00s
Public Record
Public Record
Dale ,411or
Inspection
VeMlad*n sorlros
15-19-9Letframmer_
- _-KZ
DESCRIPTION_-- r 1-0 f A elmenl
Data
VALUE ADJUSTMENTS
DESCRIPTION
—DE6CRIPTION I 0 S
oa
DESCRIPTION • (•1 f wd
Sobs Or FewncOp
COnV . 30 yr
ccrlasalea
$17.5000 __:
Qftsh
Cash
Dale of Sale/nne
—5= _ _ --10-8-93
_
— —
2-1-94
'.
..
A
L
E_.
g:
'..
C
O
M.
Location
Loa6tn
/Ave_Bu-
_...
ralI-So r) _-11.1.900._
Zee_.stirplo ,------
1.1.acr'e_ —_--_
Mtr)s,_'e - .. - ---
_L9g_Qla1eL —__.--
Gc--=_Fair
_5yrS/3eff__ +J_,
Total _ Bdrms nano _
+ —4 000
�_.2_±JJ . 2.__
_1, 275_sk!-Fl._
_ Wre/_Inf} —_
hltrts,-It n1, Va1____
Victorian
-Average
LoUtIN 'Fee Sabi
.
she1.9
.L1H:j1�
14acr /Inf1:
_MtW_'Dnak
V ]an_
view
1`9ts,_Riverer,_
Design wApps
gOtgpp
a.tley pfCeaeao
air-Aver
Fairn&Wrne
: +26,300
Fair }:
Ta1N ' adlns : Be" '
4 2 1
840s4 FL + 10,800
Ap
New
24yrs_/Z50= + 4
_Total editors, Bad" :
5._2_x_
Concision
New
Above Leda
Room CouM
Gross Area
TONT ' edam: ; Beals
IF200 Sq. Ft.
Basement 8 FHa1N0
Rooms Bob. Gods
No Basent
N4 Basement_.--._---
Finis)ied//SZIp
Elect B5- _
Average--.-----
P,
A
R
o
N
No Basentt----
Min. Fin/Silt._--
Convect/Inf ; +ta, 09
-�+vera9e - '- '----
No Baserilt
Furcdbnel Liver
i _shed
Fin
Heaa,pc "
_E1ec_t_5B_
Errerfer Ef cent Wros
Ave._r
Da Caroort
A
N
A
:L
Y:
_AYerage
_`_on
N9_Qarage
Decks -1,500
J.-WoQd strove ---
s,�
yT,Qne _ .. _ —. —_--
Poral, Pad*, Deal
F,N sl. efG
No Decks
I Wood stove
Similar
�1one--'- : +l
similar
+
For. Pool. ala.
_Plane
S
---
Q9_
c
/j. -_ 189, 400
a,npaaDary In nce aipTbPrlgod, ele.):
///'��
I S
$ 60
Adjusted Sales Plla
of ComDneble
Commenft on Salvo Compedsun
(Mudinp IM subject propeM's
.��. ., �,
'3�8�I.'.�,.A�0
-�
ia ��]..�
addeerM4r11
ITEM
SUBJECT
COMPAnANLE NO.1COMPARABLE
NO.2
COMPARABLE NO.3
I.
Data, Price, and Deft
Source, for Prior sobs
moh year of sorre
None
one _
None
None
Malyste of orry want apeemoM of sale. option. or is" of me subject proV'rly and 3N"S el any prior "les of subject and comparables wMNn ON year of IN date of aPPraWF.
See attached addend= _. -- .---._--_-- -----
INDICATED VALUE BY SALES COMPARISON APPROACH _ =140,000
INDICATED VALUE BY INCOME APPROACH I0 Appbi Esu,naNd WIWI ROM s N/A No. a Gross ROM Mui", • t
'
TTN epprid al Is mad, Li "os li LJ subject to IN rapiers. aaki bspsonoa or condd*a (sled abw )( subject b o Pled*n per plans and spedlbba.
DPrstaba of ApPr.Na: See a ;wbeft addetidum. -------_—_--
F01SI RoaMad*n: SPP attached addeDdtnn•-- .. __-- ---
10
--
C-
kk I'
IL:.
fA
IT
Qs�ynalug
N
- — ' —
The to Ww of N! appralnl N b ssteaN ON market wbe of IN real pronarty IMI N 1N subject of ails report, bend on ale above opnddona and sN an heart, onnMgere and aln�lP
ooralNorN, oast rlftdet velue delkvibn Mal we sated In IN aIIw Nd Fredda` Mac cpm 100/Farv,le Mae Form 10049 (Raelnd I'
I(WE)ESTIMATETHE MARKETVALUE, ASDEFINED, OFTHE 11, -AL PROPERTY THATISTHE SUBJECTOFTHISREPORTASOF 6-19-94
(WHICH IS THE DATE OF INSPECTION AND THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS REPORT)TO BES __140,000
SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (ONLY IF REQUIRED):
'. APPRAISER: � ❑
Slpnabre.- __.. Du qd Nol
Nems S F. ii7e-Y't, .S teams Inspect Property
vett, RepPrl Siprrd 6-71-94 _-- _ Date ne"I slpad y_—
sNN
So,te Cwtoced*n 0 CBQQ001767 —. .-_ -.... -:Lila 03 _ _ State CaoPeaapn a --- _
Or Slab LkwuIs I '1310 Or Stale License I at -
Freddie Mae Form 70 6.50
17
TOTAL" sign ivd vsllwa,0 by e te rmNW, irv:. 1.900 ALAMOOE
PAGE 2 OF 2
9
A
L
E
5
C
0
h1
P
A
n
i
9
0
N
A
N
A
L
Y
9
4a
PeWraisal Service (303) 963-856 •
MARKET DATA ANALYSIS
Those recent mhos of pro" , ve most arms., ane ym.imate, to wblocl pmts haw been conSUersd In Iho market ims"is. The dax tpaon IncuNs • dceM adjObvenl, eNCIYq model
necdon b dem home of slpJMant NNHon betwmn Na subject and mmp.rable blowde i. II a si n1fcant tum b the comparab4 ,,at b rat W. b, mon, fawnb4 Nen, Ne wb) d
property, a foliate Id edMOmen1 Is made, Nus reeudne the Ndbaled value of aubjed: II a significant Hem In IN comparable Is Interior W. p len Inoeble Nan, Eli Wb)ect property. • pica (r)
adjufinent IS made, data increasing, she Mkalad In of prs wbrod.
ITEM
SUBJECT
COMPARABLE N0.
COMPARABLE NO. 5
COMPARABLE NO. 6
26810 Frying Pan Ida
Address Meredith
1;3j)
Pitkin County 4B
Metes & Bounds
rmarnlly b SubjM
�.,€ '�c"'�ss� T:
: N/A_
1 5 miles north
_ '< s 125 000
Sale, Price
PtsattYom lhiq Aru
ti m
s 97.20 m �3,,;
s mzesyjy_.
f m e�R'�."$,siciao:4
Date and/or
Verification Source
Inspection
6-19-94 eff
Realtor
VALUE ADJUSTMENTS
DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION t () f Atl)uebnanl
DESCRIPTION I s F) S Adjustments
DESCRIPTION ♦ I•) S Adju bwM
_
Sales or Financing
C;onoe tens
,V :
.i ' "�3>'3k +
Rural Ave
Listing
Date of Sslertsne
N A
_
Loeadon
Rural/Ave
L*snhoWFN Single
Fee simple
Fee simple______
su
1.9 acre
1.25ac//Sim_
Vie.
Mtns, River
Mtns, River_____
wean ane Apw�
Contempt
Cabin —
-
NaNy, of ceruaup6on
Fair -Average
Fair -Average ,__
Aa
New
3/15 eff. . +18,800
Con~
New.
Ab.Ave-Good
Abow Oede
Room Count
Ada
Total : Bmma : Bale
Teel . Smms: Basis
5 . 3 2_ -4,000
J 286 SR• Ft.
Total Bdrms : Bale
Scs R.
TOM ' Intent, : Bale '
SR. R.
4 2 1
975 sq. Pt.
_Oros,LA/ep
Basomenl S Waited
Roberta Bob. Grade
No Basemt
No Basemt
Furwmn.lUB>,.
Unfinished
Min.Fi im_--
N..
Elect BB
Central
Average _
Energy Efficient Items
Averacle
G.rape/Carpod
None
1 car Garage -5,000
Porch. Paso. Dedr,
Flreptecep), alp.
No Decks
1 Flood stave
Similar
1 Wood stove
Wta. Pod, eta
None
None
Not Adfunnom IbteO+
5 16 200
X + $ 0
+ • : = 0
Admired Sales PM
of Comparable
�.
".^5. 3`
None
i
. S 141 200
None
,.,, x,;? `c`'%�7 $�`
Data, Price and Dau
Source for pdon mlee
wit year of opprabal
Comments on Marini Data
_
Model Data Analysis 6 93 'TOTAL' pteeniml foSeae by a Is mode. Inc. 141WALAMIDDE
Sz
F
APPRA; ;,;L REPORT ADDENDUM
1� N 1'�I •�� '• j It
The subject is located beyond t:he small town of Meredith, about 27 miles east
of the Town of Basalt, on the c::ist side of Ruedi Reservoir. Most of the area
is open vacant land, with forest service or BLM land on all sides, except the
reservoir bordering the west. Terrain varies from fairly level to steeply
sloping.
NEIGHBORHOOD hII1RKEZ7+BILITY FACTORS
Meredith is a very small community twenty miles east of downtown Basalt, and
on the east side of the large Ruedi Reservoir. Meredith is a very small
community with little facilities. Basalt is a larger town which offers all
necessary support facilities, schools, and other services. The subject is in
the area known as the "Frying Pan River/Road" area - and the road follows the
river east of Basalt with developments on either side of the river that are
primarily single family residential with acreage. This particular town is
about ten miles beyond the pre;onderance of residential development, although
there are some other large tract residential uses all the way up the Frying
Pan. Ruedi Shores is one of the subdivisions in this area, along with the
Ruedi South Shores development closer to Meredith. Since there is little
development in this area, it is considered rural, although some of these
subdivisions have quite a few :,i.tes within them.
This area has been appealing to primary residents looking for more affordable
housing and/or acreage, as well as to second home owners looking for a more
rural setting with some land and good views, yet convenient accessibility to
the amenities of the area including recreation on the reservoir and ski areas
within an hour.
Basalt, and other communities .in this part of the valley, have experienced
steady growth over the past few years as local employees and professionals
move into this area to find affordable housing. The average price of a house
in Aspen in 1993 was at $1.5 million, which out -prices even many of the
professionals who work or own businesses and trades in Aspen. Bsalt has been
developing as a support commuiD y with growth in housing as well as other
support services, such as shopping, restaurants, banks, and other
conveniences. Aspen is a world-renomied ski resort community and much of the
valley caters to the tourist industry both winter and summer. There are four
major ski areas within twenty miles of Basalt, and numerous other activities
such as snowmobiling, cross country skiing, hiking, biking, and fishing on the
world class waters of the Frying Pan and Roaring Fork Rivers.
MARKET OONDITIONS
The market in this area and tmr-)ughout the Roaring Fork Valley has been very
strong, influenced not only by the low interest rates in the past few years,
but also by the high demand for affordable housing in the valley. This demand
still continues, and Basalt has some neighborhoods that have experienced rapid
growth in the last three to four years to fulfill the need for primary
residences. In fact, there currently is, and has been, little standing
inventory in the more affordablo. price ranges, say, under $250,000. This has
affected all segments of the mai.-ketplace. The high demand and low supply has
resulted in increasing prices over the last few years.
LISTINGS
5 1
There are only a total of 28 single family residential listings in the whole
Basalt area - which includes up the Frying Pan, and north, south and west of
Basalt. Of these, nine are presently under contract. Of the remaining there
are only eight that offer some ,-icreage, and these range from $255,000 to over
$6,000,000 and vary in acreage. Most of these are to the west of Basalt, a
superior location that is closer to town and to the highway with better
accessibility to the amenities: of the valley. There is one listing in Ruedi
Shores, a 1.3 acre parcel with n 4 bedroom 2 bath home with 2460 SF, listed at
$255,000.
Financing is available through nunerous local sources at competitive rates for
conventional mortgages. Seller: concessions are unusual as the market has been
strong and tending towards a sr,.l.ler's market.
SITE COMMENTS
The subject site is bordered by the Fryingtx.rn River on the south and the North
Fork Fryingpan on the north, aiul is at the corner of the intersection of
these. Although bordered by these two rivers, the area appears to be in a
Zone X flood hazard area, according to the map panel, which is described as an
area determined to be outside the 500 year flood plain.
The subject site is heavily wooded and will have a dirt/gravel drive accessing
the improvements from the main road. There will be minimal landscaping,
mostly indigenous growth. It has nearly two acres of land, at the corner of
the Fryingpan River and the Nori:h Fork Fryingpan River.
This house will have minimal urgrades or finish features. At this time, the
proposed finish will be plywoc-1 floors, unfinished drywall walls, and minimal
finish and appliances in the kitchen. There will be a wood stove in the
living room.
DEPRECIATION
This is a proposed construction that will have minimal finish. Being new, it
will not have deferred mainteimce or physical depreciation. The lack of
finish is considered in calculating the replacement cost estimates and also
charged as additional depreciation to account for the added factor of inferior
market appeal due to the lack of: these items to make the home more
functionally appealing. Functional depreciation is charged at 5%, an estimate
of the cost of labor and fees that a potential owner would incur over and
above the actual costs to fini:;i the house.
This house will be located in an area of similar types of residential
development, causing no advers,! external influences.
The figures used in the cost apiproach are estimated using Marshall & Swift
Valuation checked with local building costs. The base cost is at $48.41, with
the following added: roof ($.67); energy $1.45; foundation $3.21; floor cover
$2.02; plumbing ($3.02); heat.i.i:.7 ($1.46). To this, another 25% is added to
account for the subject's rural. location which would require added transport
fees for supplies and shipping.
Site improvements includes the cost for the septic and minimal landscaping.
Site value is estimated from sales of sites in the Ruedi Shores development,
I1
0
as well as other sales of larger parcels around Meredith and Thomasville.
This includes the subject parcel which sold in 1990 for $25,000.
M}1= SALES COMPARISON APPROP.c_T
The subject will be built by the owner with minimal finish to begin with, to
be used as a second home. The property is unique and highly appealing - being
at the intersection of the Norl•.h Fork and Fryingpan Rivers. This is a
beautiful site for a second home site offering seclusion, mature trees, and
river frontage.
There is very little that com!ki.res to this property in location, size and
finish. Most of the properties that are out this far (in the
Meredith/Thomasville area) are much larger parcels of land. This is a
sparsely developed area to begin with, which makes finding comparable sales
even more difficult. Much of the recent activity in this area has been for
vacant land of forty acres or more. However, as luck would have it, the
appraiser was able to find on-camparable in the immediate area that is a new
listing and is now under contract to close in August!!
This was the only comparable -• sale or listing - found in this area that
offers a small parcel of land with improvements. The other three comparables
are all closed sales which are used to offer a bracketing for varying
features, amenities, location .uxl data. Only one other sale was found in this
area in the past year which offers comparability in site and improvements.
This is a home in the Ruedi Shores development. The other two sales are both
older homes from the turn -of -the -century, and therefore comparable in quality
and finish - but they are both located in central downtown Basalt, a superior
location.
The appraiser has used these comparables, even though there are some major
differences requiring large adjustments, to offer a bracketing. I have
searched records for land sales and residential sales, and found no more
similar properties to use in c,:aopaarison.
Comp 1 is in the Ruedi Shores cavelopment, on the north side of the Ruedi
Reservoir with unobstructed views over same, and closer to Basalt. This
subdivision has been more app.eii1i.ng to local residents for primary residency
since it is closer to town. T!cc location is adjusted at 5%. This property
has a similar sized site.
The house is fairly new and moe modern and complete in finish and quality.
The quality is adjusted at $25 psf. An age adjustment is made as the subject
is new, using a 60 year, straiglit line method (age difference / estimated life
x sales price x improvement ratio). This house has two bedrooms plus a loft
and two full baths. The bath it: adjusted at $4,000. It similar in size as
the subject. This house is finished and completed, with good quality, and a
functional adjustment is made L'n account for the subject's unfinished walls,
floors, kitchen, etc. This is adjusted at $5 psf. The other adjustment is
for the exterior decks, adjusted at an estimated cost.
Comp 2 is right in town, which is a superior location but on a much smaller
site. The location and site size are both factors of the land and are
weighted against each other. Tris house is 94 years old, and although it has
had some updating and remodelira through the years, it was reported in fair
shape and in need of TLC. An :,;e adjustment is made, with the condition
reflected in this large age ad:';u:_tment. It is smaller in size. and this is
adjusted at $30 psf, which is '.n line with the market.
53
I
This house has two bedrooms al!! one Lkith. The finish and interior is
considered generally similar a::: it is in ne(-rl of renovation, therefore no
functional adjustment is made. ibis house does not have a wood stove and this
is a market adjustment.
Comp 3 is another old home in town. This has similar adjustments as Comp 2
and is a smaller house.
Comp 4 is a cabin up the road to the north of the subject. This property is
overall considered most similar. It has similar access to the property.
Adjustments are also made for �,ge and garage. This property has no central
heat, and was built as a cabinand is considered similar in finish and
function to the subject.
The appraiser is leaning most lien vily on the fourth comparable for the
indication of value by the sab..! comparison approach.
SALEMISTIM HISTORY -
The subject is not presently listed for sale and the appraiser is not aware of
any current purchase contract. It has not sold in the past five years. The
comparables have not had any other sales in the past year than those cited and
used in the market grid.
OOMMETfS AND CONDITIONS OF APF::._T.SAL
The income approach is not an rIpplicable method as there is little data for
long term rentals in this markrl_. This makes deriving market data for rent`
and a gross rent multiplier very difficult and results in an inconsistent and
unreliable value indication.
The value estimate in this re;;•..:C is subjr:ct to completion of the proposed
improvements according to the ;)l.ans and specifications provided the appraiser.
Any changes from these and oU,_r assumptions made as to finish, could have an
effect on the value.
FINAL RECONCILIATION
The subject is a proposed consi.cuction that will be a second home of minimal
finish, located on a prime sit(. at the intersection of the North Fork and
FYyingpan Rivers. This is an a;:ipealing property, but the subject has some
unfinished finish items, althr::;h it should be adequately functional with
running water, septic, and a kitchen.
The market sales comparison approach is the most reliable method to use for a
value indication for the subjeca as it best considers current market activity
and reactions to these smaller properties and properties of minimal finish
appeal. Although there are sc,r:a large adjustments, these offer a bracketing
and a fairly consistent value r::rge indication for the subject.
The cost approach is extremeay l'iffi.cult to apply due to a lack of clear
finish specifications as well r:,s a lack of site sales activity for sites under
five acres in this area. The c;:praiser is not considering the cost approach
to be applicable and therefore ,-it weighting this method in the final value
estimate. The Income approach is not applied due to a lack of reliable long
term rental data in this markcC,,Ilace.
10
5N
Q -R h
The market has been strong and l.ler concessions are unusual. There were no
favorable financing terms found in the comparable sales used in this report.
FURNISHINGS
The furniture in the older pro; .:�rties tends to be worn and ready for
replacement and adds little, i;' )nytling, to the value of the property. This
report does not include any furniture in the value estimate for the subject
property.
H AP=ING TIME
Although the subject property i:, quite a ways from town, and therefore would
appeal to a more limited markc'..,il.ace, it is in an affordable price range and
it is difficult to find anythii:.; Lu -der $150,000 in the present market.
Properties that are competitivi,].y priced will typically move in six months,
and this report estimates a m .lieting time for the subject at around six
months at this value level.
0
DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open
market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price Is
not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition Is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from
seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (1) buyer and seller are typically motivated; (2) both parties are well informed or well advised,
and each acting in what he considers his own best interest; (3) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; (4) payment
is made in terms of cash in U. S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (5) the price represents the normal
consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions' granted by anyone associated with
the sale.
Adjustments to the comparables must be made for special or creative financing or sales concessions. No adjustments are necessary
for those costs which are normally paid by sellers as a result of tradition or law in a market area; these costs are readily identifiable
since the seller pays these costs In virtually all sales transactions. Special or creative financing adjustments can be made to the
comparable property by comparisons to financing terms offered by a third party institutional lender that is not already involved in the
property or transaction. Any adjustment should not be calculated on a mechanical dollar for dollar cost of the financing or concession
but the dollar amount of any adjustment should approximate the market's reaction to the financing or concessions based on the
appraisers judgment.
STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS AND APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION
CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: The appraisers certification that appears in the appraisal report is
subject to the following conditions:
1. The appraiser will not be responsible for matters of a legal nature that affect either the property being appraised or the title to it. The
appraiser assumes that the title is good and marketable and, therefore, will not render any opinions about the title. The property is
appraised on the basis of it being under responsible ownership.
2. The appraiser has provided a sketch in the appraisal report to show approximate dimensions of the improvements and the sketch is
included only to assist the reader of the report in visualizing the property and understanding the appraisers determination of its size.
3. The appraiser has examined the available flood maps that are provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (or other data
sources) and has noted in the appraisal report whether the subject site is located in an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. Because the
appraiser Is not a surveyor, he or she makes no guarantees, express or Implied, regarding this determination.
4. The appraiser will not give testimony or appear in court because he or she made an appraisal of the property in question, unless
specific arrangements to do so have been made beforehand.
5. The appraiser has estimated the value of the land in the cost approach at its highest and best use and the improvements at their
contributory value. These separate valuations of the land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and
are invalid if they are so used.
6. The appraiser has noted in the appraisal report any adverse conditions (such as, needed repairs, depreciation, the presence of
hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc.) observed during the inspection of the subject property or that he or she became aware of during
the normal research involved in performing the appraisal. Unless otherwise stated in the appraisal report, the appraiser has no knowledge
of any hidden or unapparent conditions of the property or adverse environmental conditions (including the presence of hazardous wastes,
toxic substances, etc.) that would make the property more or less valuable, and has assumed that there are no such conditions and makes
no guarantees or warranties, express or implied, regarding the condition of the property. The appraiser will not be responsible for any
such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because
the appraiser is not an expert in the field of environmental hazards, the appraisal report must not be considered as an environmental
assessment of the property.
7. The appraiser obtained the information, estimates, and opinions that were expressed in the appraisal report from sources that he or she
considers to be reliable and believes them to be true and correct. The appraiser does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of such
items that were furnished by other parties.
8. The appraiser will not disclose the contents of the appraisal report except as provided for in the Uniform Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice.
9. The appraiser has based his or her appraisal report and valuation conclusion for an appraisal that is subject to satisfactory completion,
repairs, or alterations on the assumption that completion of the improvements will be performed in a workmanlike manner.
10. The appraiser must provide his or her prior written consent before the lender/client specified in the appraisal report can distribute the
appraisal report (including conclusions about the property value, the appraisers identity and professional designations, and references to
any professional appraisal organizations or the firm with which the appraiser is associated) to anyone other than the borrower; the
mortgagee or its successors and assigns; the mortgage insurer; consultants; professional appraisal organizations; any state or federally
approved financial institution; or any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States or any state or the District of Columbia;
oxcept that the lender/client may distribute the property description section of the report only to data collection or reporting service(s)
without having to obtain the appraisers prior written consent. The appraisers written consent and approval must also be obtained before
the appraisal can be conveyed by anyone to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media.
10068 8-93
Fratldla Mao Form 639 6-93 Fannie Mae Form I
'TOTAL" appraisal soM are by a la mode, pre. 1-9o0-ALAMODE
Cl t`r` Page 1 of 2
APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATI% The Appraiser certifies and agrees that: • •
1. 1 have researched the subject market area and have selected a minimum of three recent sales of properties most similar and proximate
to the subject property for consideration in the sales comparison analysis and have made a dollar adjustment when appropriate to reflect
the market reaction to those items of significant variation. 11 a significant item in a comparable property Is superior to, or more favorable
than, the subject property, I have made a negative adjustment to reduce the adjusted sales price of the comparable and, if a significant
item in a comparable property is inferior to, or less favorable than the subject property, I have made a positive adjustment to increase the
adjusted sales price of the comparable.
2. 1 have taken into consideration the factors that have an impact on value in my development of the estimate of market value in the
appraisal report. I have not knowingly withheld any significant Information from the appraisal report and I believe, to the best of my
knowledge, that all statements and Information In the appraisal report are true and correct.
3. 1 stated in the appraisal report only my own personal, unbiased, and professional analysis, opinions, and conclusions, which are subject
only to the contingent and limiting conditions specified in this form.
4. 1 have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no present or prospective personal
Interest or bias with respect to the participants in the transaction. I did not base, either partially or completely, my analysis and/or the
estimate of market value in the appraisal report on the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin of either the
prospective owners or occupants of the subject property or of the present owners or occupants of the properties in the vicinity of the
subject property.
5. 1 have no present or contemplated future Interest in the subject property, and neither my current or future employment nor my
compensation for pedomfing this appraisal is contingent on the appraised value of the property.
6. 1 was not required to report a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client or any related parry, the
amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a specific result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event in order to receive my
compensation and/or employment for performing the appraisal. I did not base the appraisal report on a requested minimum valuation, a
specific valuation, or the need to approve a specific mortgage loan.
7. 1 performed this appraisal in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice that were adopted and
promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of The Appraisal Foundation and that were in place as of the effective date of this
appraisal, with the exception of the departure provision of those Standards, which does not apply. 1 acknowledge that an estimate of a
reasonable time for exposure in the open market is a condition in the definition of market value and the estimate I developed is consistent
with the marketing time noted in the neighborhood section of this report, unless I have otherwise stated in the reconciliation section.
6. 1 have personally inspected the interior and exterior areas of the subject property and the exterior of all properties listed as comparables
in the appraisal report. I further certify that I have noted any apparent or known adverse conditions in the subject improvements, on the
subject site, or on any site within the immediate vicinity of the subject property of which I am aware and have made adjustments for these
adverse conditions in my analysis of the property value to the extent that I had market evidence to support them. I have also commented
about the effect of the adverse conditions on the marketability of the subject property.
9. 1 personally prepared all conclusions and opinions about the real estate that were set forth in the appraisal report. If I relied on
significant professional assistance from any individual or individuals in the performance of the appraisal or the preparation of the appraisal
report, I have named such individual(s) and disclosed the specific tasks performed by them in the reconciliation section of this appraisal
report. I certify that any individual so named is qualified to perform the tasks. I have not authorized anyone to make a change to any item
in the report; therefore, if an unauthorized change is made to the appraisal report, I will take no responsibility for it.
10. As of the date of this report, I, S.F. Ebert, have completed the continuing education
requirements of the Appraisal Institute.
SUPERVISORY APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: If a supervisory appraiser signed the appraisal report, he or
she certifies and agrees that: I directly supervise the appraiser who prepared the appraisal report, have reviewed the appraisal report,
agree with the statements and conclusions of the appraiser, agree to be bound by the appraisers certifications numbered 4 through 7
above, and am taking full responsibility for the appraisal and the appraisal report.
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY APPRAISED: 26810 Frying Pan ROad
APPRAISER: SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (only If required):
Signature: Signature:
Name: c F FM1wrt,_SRA Name:
Date Signed: 6-21-94 Date Signed:
State Certification a: CR00001767 State Certification a:
or State License a: or State License a:
State: co State:
Expiration Date of Certification or License: 12-94 Expiration Date of Certification or License:
Freddle Mac Forth 439 9.93
1-1 Did F Did Not Inspect Property
'TOTAL" appraisal sollware by a la mode, Irx. 1800 A CDE
Page 2 or 2
Famw Mae Foran 1004e fi 93
13
Resume of Qualifications
for
SUSAN F. EBERT, SRA
Colorado Certified Residential CR00001767
DESIGNATION AND SERVICE:
Appraisal Institute: Senior Residential Appraiser Designation Colorado Chapter Education
Committee. Region II - Chair, State Accredited Affiliates of the Appraisal Institute. National
Committee - Vice -Chair, State Accredited Affiliates of the Appraisal institute.
PERSONAL/GOALS:
Involvement from local to national levels of the Appraisal Institute gives me the opportunity to
stay on top of critical issues in our industry. My goal is to stay current on changes and new
directions to best serve my clients needs.
EMPLOYMENT:
My experience is extensive in residential appraising, including vacant
ad all 9evels le family,
duplex
units, 2-4 family, relocation. I have performed residential appraisals
from the
nearly -totally depreciated house to the multi-millon dollar properties, including ranches, that
exist throughout these resorts areas. Other experience includes apartment buildings,
condominium projects, office space, and development land.
1980-1987 Office Manager, Ebert Appraisal Service
1986-1993 Appraiser, Ebert Appraisal Service
January, 1994 President & Chief Appraiser - Peak Appraisal Services, Inc.
EDUCATION - General:
1980 -Present Colorado Mountain College
C ter and Management Training
1991, July
EDUCATION - Continuing
EDUCATION - Professional
1994, April
1994, February
1994, January
1993, December
1993, July
1993, May
1993, January
1992, November
1992, August
1991, June
1990, October
1990, September
1990, April
Bookkeeping, ompu
Colorado Mountain College/College-Level
Examination Program, Received scores over 475 on the 5 general
CLEP Exams.
Motivation and Management Seminars from Tony Robbins, Denis
Waitley, etc.
USPAP, Part A - Appraisal Institute
Fair Lending and the Appraiser - Appraisal Institute
New URAR Seminar - Appraisal Institute
530 Adv. Sales Comparison & Cost Approaches - Appraisal Institute
Evaluation Guidelines Workshop - Appraisal Institute
Advanced Demonstration Appraisal Report, Lock -In - Appraisal Institute
Appraisal Reporting of Complex Residential Properties - Appraisal
Institute
Appraising with the Residential Reviewer in Mind - Appraisal Institute
Reviewing Appraisals - Appraisal Institute
Standards of Professional Practice, Part B - Appraisal Institute
Principles of Income Property Appraising (201) - Society of Real Estate
Appraisers
Forecasting Real Estate Demand Seminar - Society of Real Estate
Appraisers
Depreciation Analysis Seminar - Society of Real Estate Appraisers
1989
Affiliated Banks REO Seminar; Depreciation Analysis Seminar; Applied
Residential Property Valuation (Course 102); The Appraiser as Expert
Witness Seminar - Society of Real Estate Appraisers; Advanced
Appraiser Techniques Seminar (The Relocation Institute)
1987 Professional Practice Seminar - Society of Real Estate Appraisers;
FNMA REO and URAR Seminar
1986 Appraising Real Property (Course 101) - Society of Real Estate
Appraisers
File Number
Subject Address
Legal Description
City
County
State
ZIP
Owner/Occupant
Lender/Client
: 26810 Frying Pan Road
: Section 21, Township 8 South,
: Meredith
Pitkin
: CO
: 81642
: ROTH
: Aspen Mortgage Capital
Range 83 West
Area Dimensions
Type of Area
Area
Level
Measurements Factor
Area
Liv Bsm Gar Oth
One
Two Three
30.00 X 20.00 X 1.00 =
600.00
X
X
30.00 X 20.00 X 1.00 =
600.00
X
X
X X =
X X =
X X =
X X =
X X =
X X =
X X =
X X =
X X =
X X =
X X =
X X =
X X =
Gross Building Area (GBA)=
1,200
2# # # #
1#
10 #
Gross Living Area (GLA) =
1,200
100% % %
50%
50% %
Bsm= Gar= Oth=
Lvl 1= 600 2=
600 3=
15
Loft Floor Plan I `U
Building
WRIARIMA Win, 0 %W*;& gg
1hr WAIF
P,
-;..-1041 HAZARD REVD
F tP O:t KOR
T
3L
stT "M3
UN COLO RA DOod"-
<
rC� ;"C;��
Owt AP Is OPY Of
RECOKOED FLAT L41TW
,_� \,. - � Abojrjws r-dF- \IP[i?-IAN3cE
T T
i
CLACAT(0J
rkPF�/ --�
K:k 1
Crystal View
c,
NG PARK RESERVOIR
yviag
4g,
sp° "Mduk Meacows
C,o
�i.0?9 `b"� Basalt Mtn.. PenP
4 uRd a SOmmr E REBEL' 10,114 C 1hp
O
�"8"'"9 Comp 2
Fpr
-aura J. states - BASAL
Elk Rur
a{y�
Crown Mtnr slates~ pub K Ranches
- Cates-"
O -.
Creek.F
Y
Q
Ag
-"I-
`'C rg CREE
Stark Mesa
n
t ' Lt1iF
� mince Glee � •,n � :t - `�X
0 �
OINKLE LAKE?
E M8S0nFfMORSBRE
Seven Oaks I N C 0 A P o R A T E O
Clyslat Canyon Acres
Sewell T -•::5
rads •THOMA S LAKE^ - r Home/Building;
Commercial'0
WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST
0
ing ForkValley-,p- , mi
Little Manta GS"
Little Maudtl o
Mollie B. C G.
4
M'�^'
g.
U EDI RES ER V OI R
A
Hills
"0LD.a`SNOWMASS s` p
Gateway to .
Sno.vmass
f•. yf,V.Y YVarsr
�Wr _ ___
ities
NMASS
I ArF
Rd.
N Nfied
Mtn
,v
R E ,'Peachblow
Ford k
�'G PAN
iV
10, 26
Isles,.:R
YIN
/-
A
Sloane
Peak
L E G E N D
C ,,-
10,602
c Forest Service Campgrou
C, Ems/
Q.
A Mountain Peak
012 MILES
ate'
"?
Ski Area
National Forest Service
_
Ski Touring Center
i=e. Bureau of Land Management
Hills
"0LD.a`SNOWMASS s` p
Gateway to .
Sno.vmass
f•. yf,V.Y YVarsr
�Wr _ ___
ities
NMASS
I ArF
Rd.
N Nfied
Mtn
' •c — m y+, , �� � -- Y C J � \ �.. '^V:;.C'" Ab" I Si' � � ':iX � `••• I\ I , .i
zl-: 3 -
IN
IC -
"Wo
Mo.
lrlo'cf PC 55 A 3
3; 0
Cy
of
fj , rt, )fl 'Ac
j
�gg - pot
.7)
O&W yr—
(Nw.
Fit
E3
d;7
Z7
1: .... . ...
. .
m 0
AL
M.W
W4
—7. f
4f
ac
4%7
nk
03
ee
17 1
10—
'�.m c *4
Lo I . IT'll
"NC'.AN
ZONE A
IG
40
ZONE X
�C)
ZONE X MORIN
40
eck
/J210 21 R"" I -Rd
; ZONE A
ZONE A
TNI
P'.
Cer
by
�
B."
baY
4 FW
%al
30
29
Ele'
ZONE X SIR
C.,
rn,
1110.1t F.,
7� ---- PIM
Fto,
FIRM t&mtt tilt UP St.
La INSU
Z
OIINI Y.
C.'D Do AND EAS
coorolthl" AID z
33 NWt,,q of 325
'%sicaloa C
iFfEcTIVE llhlt:
JUNE 4 1511Rar,
.1.1.
ZONE A
To
e. coal
$
WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST
it
20