Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.eh.246736102001 (2005)Document Layout (From Most Recent to Oldest Permit) Permit Application Log Sheet/Notes & Photos Communications As -built Design Engineer Design Soil Information Water Permit & Information Second System on property Third System.etc. Floor Plans Please See Building and Land Use Approvals Files for additional information. Permit # 05009 Pitkjounty Environmental Health Departro Pe for an Individual Sewage Disposal S m 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-5077 Parcel ID # 2467-361-02-001 Type of permit New( x ) Repair( ) Addition/Remodel to House( ) Name of Owner James Eroncig Street Address 2WSLower River Rd Property legal description Lot 1, Murry Low Impact Size of lot 18.4 acres Total square footage of the house Water source Private well # of bedrooms in house E Caretaker unit Attached # of bedrooms in caretaker unit .m # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house Total square footage of the caretaker unit # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in caretaker unit Designed for what # rooms (list) 6 bedrooms + 4 horse stalls in barn Permit information Designed by Schmueser Gordon Meyer Mailing Address 118 W. 6" St., Suite 200, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Perc rate 30 mpi Profile hole depth 8 ft Depth to groundwater or bedrock Greater than 8 ft Minimum Septic tank capacity 3850 gallons Minimum Absorption area 2361 sq ft w/ 30% reduction Septic permit approved per compliance with the engineer design and specifications dated November 21, 2002 and revisions from March 21, 2005 letter. Any changes must be approved by this department and the design engineerrp for to them being made. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the Pitkin County ISDS regulations. The engineer has stated that the setback from the well to the field can be reduced from 238 feet to 152 feet. The tank must be a minimum of 50 feet from the well. The irrigation ditch must be lined to within 102 feet of the absorption field per engineer specifications. 2� 5 This system will consist of a 2000 gallon tank followed by another 2000 gallon tank to be used as a pumping chamber. A manifold will connect the 11 rows of 25 Quick 4 chambers for a total of35funits. The field cannot exceed 100 feet in length. According to the engineer's letter, burial depth must be between 4.5 ft and 6.5 ft. A profile hole at least 4 feet below the burial depth must be dug to assure no groundwater or bedrock exists. This department does not endorse any brand of products. This permit must be kept on-site during installation. The engineer must do a final inspection of the installation and submit an as -built letter to this department. This department must also be called for an inspection with a minimum of 48 hours advanced notice. Permit approved by: iY.ti l(1 ( ,i7 G Date: r Plans and specifications of the proposed individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -built drawings must be Included with thlsFpermit before the final approval will be Issued. nt Installer: I p fQQG) - f- L,.iGt Yl l Cy 1,Y) n I _x r 611tal approval: 0-eLc a l; t� Date: L4 11--31 U:Z PITKIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10, Aspen Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970-920-5077 Name of OWNER James Eroncig Owner's Mailing Address 2730 West 3r° Avenue, Suite 401 City, State, Zip Miami, FL 33129 Business Phone: Home Phone: E-mail Address: Primary Contact Person (all communication regarding this permit will go through this person) Name Dan Cokley Company Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc Contact Mailing Address 118 West 6'" Street, Suite 200 City, State, Zip Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Business Phone : 970 945-1004 Cell Phone: Fax : 970 945-5948 E-mail Address: danc@sgm-inc.com at 920-5160 or at www.aspon.com/assessor/) 2467-361-02-001 25(05 Street address of property Lower River Road Legal Description: Lot 1 Block Filing Subdivision Murry Low Impact Size of lot: 18.4 acres. Type of proposed structure: Single Family Residence w/Caretaker unit Total square feet of house >6000 # of bedrooms (potential) in house Caretaker Unit: Attached ( X ) Detached ( in caretaker unit one Permit is for: New Home ( X ) Repair due to failure ( ) Remodel/Addition ( ) Emergency use ( ) Water: Private well( X ) Spring ( ) Stream ( ) Community/Public Water System ( ) If community system: Name of system The fee for a ISDS application is $330 for a permit that takes 6 hours or less for the department to approve. If approval takes longer than 6 hours, a rate of $65 per hour will be charged. The maximum fee is $1000. The basic fee of $330 is due at the time of application. The remainder, if any, will be due in two stages: first, at the time of issuance of the ISDS permit; second, before final approval of the ISDS permit. Application for an individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accurate information on locations of all existing and proposed wells, contour intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes, waterlines, springs, suction or irrigation lines, drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, floodplains, dry gulches, and existing septic systems. I hereby certify that any such features not shown on attached site map are not present. Issuance of the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may be undertaken until all approvals and permits have been obtained. The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department, Pitkin County and employees of these agencies will be held harmless should the individual sewage disposal system fail or malfunction. The permit to construct is issued on information submitted by the applicant or his/her representatives. The owner ass es full responsibility in case of failure of the system. 9 Signature of applicant Date G aL» an Cokley // ^^ Received by Receipt # � � lL Date 9 OD, G:\eh\isds\isdsapp\is p .doc Pitki.ounty Environmental Health Departat Permit for an Individual Sewage Disposal System 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-5077 Permit# 02093 Parcel ID# 2467-361-02-001 Type of permit New( x ) Repair( ) Addition/Remodel to House( ) Name of Owner James Eroncig Street Address 2565 Lower River Rd. Property legal description Lot 1, Murry Low Impact Size of lot 18.4 acres Total square footage of the house Water source Private well # of bedrooms in house Caretaker unit Attached # of bedrooms in caretaker unit M 6 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house Total square footage of the caretaker unit # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in caretaker unit Designed for what # rooms (list) 6 bedrooms i Permit information Designed by Schmueser Gordon Meyer Mailing Address 118 W. 6" St., Suite 200, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Perc rate Profile hole depth 8 ft Depth to groundwater or bedrock Minimum Septic tank capacity 3849 gallons Minimum Absorption area Comments Greater than 8 ft 3.332 sg1t- Septic permit approved per compliance with the engineer design and specifications dated November 21, 2002. Any changes must be approved by this department and the design engineer prior to them being made. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the Pitkin County ISDS regulations. The engineer has stated that the setback from the well to the field can be reduced from 238 feet to 152 feet. The tank must be a minimum of 50 feet from the well.The irrigation ditch must be lined to within 102 feet of the absorption field per engineer specifications. t.j„ .�G. fi ,)w Vriv 1 k fcxvl! This system will consist of a 2000 gallon tank followed by another 2000 gallon tank to be used as a pumping chamber. A manifold will connect the 6 - The field cannot exceed 100 feet in length. This department does not endorse any brand of products. This permit must be kept on-site during installation. The engineer must do a final inspection of the installation and submit an as -built letter to this department. This department must also be called for an inspection with a minimum of 48 hours advanced notice. Permit approved by: Date: �17,�05 Plans and specifications of the proposed individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -built drawings mut be Installer. LCOS, Final approval: rl permit before the final approval will be issued. Date: Carla Block Pitkin County Environmental Health 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10 Aspen CO 81611 RE: Aspen, Colorado Residence, ISDS Dear Carla; n A c LENWQ0D SPRINGS 1 18 W. 6TH, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 970-945-1004 FX 9 70-94 5-594 8 ,vs�En cREST<o BunE P.0 BOX 21 55 P.O. BOX 3088 ASPEN. CO 61 612 CRESTED BUTTE. CO e, 224 970-925-6727 970-349-5355 FX: 970925-4157 n,-. 970-349-5358 The purpose of this letter is to provide supplemental information for the ISDS application for the Eroncig Residence, Lot 1, Murry Subdivision, located on Lower River Road in Pitkin County, Colorado. I would also like to note that I have based the well setback on the State's calculation of design flow (1650 gpd) rather than Pitkin County flowrate. The State setback of 152' is more than adequate to ensure the well will be protected from contamination by the ISDS. In addition, using the above criteria, the irrigation ditch setback will be based upon the State flow as well. The State setback of 102' is more than adequate to ensure the irrigation ditch will be protected from contamination by the ISDS. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or comments regarding this additional information Sincerely, Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. Dan Cokiey, P.E. CC: Crystal Barriscale, 369 South Morning Sun Avenue, Mill Valley, CA 94941 I:\1995\95101 \A\Conesp\95101 A_isds_appldoc IkYER SCHMUESER I GORDON ENGINEERS b SURVEYORS November 25, 2002 Carla Block Pitkin County Environmental Health 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10 Aspen CO 81611 RE: Aspen, Colorado Residence, ISDS Dear Carla; n A c LENWQ0D SPRINGS 1 18 W. 6TH, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 970-945-1004 FX 9 70-94 5-594 8 ,vs�En cREST<o BunE P.0 BOX 21 55 P.O. BOX 3088 ASPEN. CO 61 612 CRESTED BUTTE. CO e, 224 970-925-6727 970-349-5355 FX: 970925-4157 n,-. 970-349-5358 The purpose of this letter is to provide supplemental information for the ISDS application for the Eroncig Residence, Lot 1, Murry Subdivision, located on Lower River Road in Pitkin County, Colorado. I would also like to note that I have based the well setback on the State's calculation of design flow (1650 gpd) rather than Pitkin County flowrate. The State setback of 152' is more than adequate to ensure the well will be protected from contamination by the ISDS. In addition, using the above criteria, the irrigation ditch setback will be based upon the State flow as well. The State setback of 102' is more than adequate to ensure the irrigation ditch will be protected from contamination by the ISDS. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or comments regarding this additional information Sincerely, Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. Dan Cokiey, P.E. CC: Crystal Barriscale, 369 South Morning Sun Avenue, Mill Valley, CA 94941 I:\1995\95101 \A\Conesp\95101 A_isds_appldoc Pitkin County Environmental Health Department Contact Log Sheet Name: f-,,,. ^ n ParcelID#: Address: Date Person Spoken To Comments /.Action to be Taken Initials Time -7 VV, r �AQCtC6[�p LL � r Ol (Ilflr� Lxti Q IA ASPEN EARTHMOVING Box 1090, Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Gafy ;)EMS _ ,zze,w.s- 4id-G�lGB Home 970-625-4569 Office 970-963-0377 Cellular 970-379-7561 FAX 970-963-2247 0 Pitkin County Environmental Health Department Contact Log Sheet V )pro 00),�VL4rime Parcel D• Address: � Person Spoken o Comments Action to be Taken NOUN, •�_ � t .'•t 11 i' 01 .. Mm i .r'Il.'.RWINRI' 7.!Jmiw&Tav Ia♦~� tr _ "Myra Iii- � .L a .. ♦\ .. __ R1''ARM f�'.'i�__ ���.,�1��f�li7��lall►7n�1talrlii�i a'�11.F AN MI_ r i ..ice. • \1.. __ V )pro 00),�VL4rime to 0 May 28, 2003 Mr. Dan Cokley Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc 118 West 6th St, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Parcel ID #2467-361-02-001 Eroncig Property - 2565 Lower River Rd Property Legal Description: Lot I Murry Low Impact Dear Mr Cokley: In reviewing our files, we found that a final inspection of the septic system at the above property was never requested. If this project was completed, it is important that you contact our office to schedule an inspection. If the project was not completed or was put on hold, please let us know that as well. Please respond by June 28`h, 2004. Please contact me at (970) 920-5070 with any questions. Thank you in advance for advising us of the status of the project. Sincerely, Erena Miller Pitkin County Environmental Health cc: James Eroncig, owner 0 (y SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER :V� 7 E N GIN E E R 5 S SURVEYORS RED!Et'vED MAR 2 31 2005 PITKIN OWN" FNVIRONMENTAL HEALTH March 21, 2005 Carla Block Pitkin County Environmental Health 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10 Aspen CO 81611 RE: Eroncig Residence ISDS, Lot 1, Murry Subdivision Dear Carla; GLENWOOD SPRINGS 118 w. 5TH, SUIM 200 OLETN/JCO SPIi4i. CO e 11501 970945-1004 E .. 970945-5948 0 ASPEN P.O, BOX 21 55 .L4PEN, CO 8 18 1 2 970-925-8727 " 970-925-4157 CRESTED BUTTE P.O. DIM 3088 CRMTEO BUTTE, CO e 1 224 970-349-5355 ": 970-349-5358 Fax: 920-5077 The purpose of this letter is to provide updated design information for the ISDS application for the Eroncig Residence, Lot 1, Murry Subdivision, located on Lower River Road in Pitkin County, Colorado. Under separate cover, updated percolation testing results completed by HP Geotech will be provided. As stated in earlier project correspondence and the original design drawings, design percolation rates were recently verified during the initial construction of the system. The leachfield location was staked and partially excavated on site. Percolation test holes were located in each corner of the proposed field. The percolation results were favorable and we will be using a design percolation rate of 30 minutes per inch. The contractor is using Infiltrator "Quick 4 Standard" chambers, the design allows for 9.2 s.f. per chamber. Applying a 30% reduction factor for gravelless chambers, there will be 257 units required for the bed configuration. It is suggested that a bed consisting of 11 rows of 25 chambers be constructed (roughly 33' x 100', 275 units). Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or comments regarding this submittal. Sincerely, Schmueser Gordon Mey�- '-- Dan Cokley, P.E. CC: Alan Styers, 923-9514 Jeff Brain, 963-2247 1:\1995195101ANCorrespU5101 A_isds_rev.dw MAR -22-2005 14:30 H -P GEOTECH • GlIll H �tG'Cfl FAX TRANSMITTAL FORM DATE: 3-22-06ti HEPWORTH - PAWLAi�GEOTECHNICAL, INC.5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970.945.7968 Far.: 970.945-8454 E-mail: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com !Iell:[el<iDTii: t c TO: Carla Block (PitCo Env. Health Dept.) FAX NO. 920-5077 FROM: Trevor L. Knell. P.E. Number of Pages: 2 (including this page) MESSAGE: Carla, As requested, I'm sending you SGM's site plan (provided by Dan Cokley, 945-1004) amended with our recent percolation test locations. The percolation test holes were hand dug at each corner of the bottom of the excavated leach field area, which I pleasured as approximately 20' by 100' by pacing. The plan provided by SGM shows a field approximately 42' by 100', so I assume that Aspen Earthmoving had only excavated about %2 of the total field size. If you have any questions about the test results, please call me at 945-7988. Thanks, Trevor The Original of this transmittal will be sent by: Ordinary Mail Overnight _x_ Fax Only _ Other The information contained in this facsimile message is confidential and intended for the sole use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, received this communication in error, or if problems occur with transmission, please notify us at 970-945-7988. Sent By: TLK MAR -22-2005 14:30 ;LASS 160 PVC !. 1/4" PER FT BACK TO TANK ) BARN H -P GEOTECH 0 r R Kyoi h Cop F,,A,d 1\5.276J8 1.5" CLASS 160 PVC LEVEL HE*DER PIPE /.4 . • P.02/02 ABSORPTION FIELD ABSORPTION AREA THROUGH CLAY LA LAYER. VERIFY PEF CONSTRUCTION. RE TOP OF BED TO M. REOVIREMENT OF 4 LEVEL OF SYSTEM. !K� 10' LINED DITCH` 100• \SETBACK —' 93.75' P71/2 20' BLDG. > / � SETBACK levi ` .tell , i / f PROPOSED 01CH ALIGNME f t / TOTAL P.02 �a 0 0 phone 970-920-5438 fax 970-920-5077 0405 Castle Creek Rd, Aspen CC 81611 e-mail carlab@a.aspen.co.us To: Dan Cokely From: Carla Block Fax: 945-5948 Pages: 2 Phone: Date: 11/25/02 Re: septic permit CC: ❑ Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Given the tight setbacks on this property, I would suggest the installer stakes out tank locations, comers of the field, etc... If you have any questions regarding this permit, please give me a call. Thank you, Carla F 6 i 61 lk 1 ok '�� i - • .-� sr'." _ rte, .`` �> J " vi y l ! . Is y: �c y"� �S •- i�. L j 1 i 1y - 400, wamp" A APP e i • r, C� 7 lip �- •• I� y a h 4% - _ r i t sAP- y • a. a .t a 1 ♦ 4 a phone 970-920-5438 fax 970-920-5077 0405 Castle Creek Rd, Aspen CO 81611 e-mail cariab@ci.aspen.co.us To: Dan Cokley From: Cada Block Fax: 945-5948 Pages: 2 Phone: Date: 3/21/05 Re: septic permit (Eroncig) CC: Leonard — Aspen Earthmoving 963-2247 ❑ Urgent 0 For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Hi Dan, I have re -issued the permit for the Eroncig residence — knowing installation is already in progress. Using the new perc data reduces the depth of the field, however, burying a bed that deep is unconventional and I would like assurance from the manufacturer that the technology will work at that depth. I will need the following... • New profile hole at least 4 feet below the depth of the installation to ensure groundwater or bedrock is not encountered. This department will need to be called to look at the profile hole. • Map from HP showing location of the new perc tests and more data about feasibility of the peres done prior to April 15. • Letter from Infiltrator confirming burial depth below 4 feet in a bed configuration will function properly. • A new as -built drawing and letter reflecting appropriate calculations and indicating depth of burial. (When installation is complete.) If you have any questions regarding this permit, please give me a call. Thank you, Cada Y a3 Dan Cokley, 02:10 PM 3/22/20, Eroncig (95101A) • Page 1 of 1 From: Dan Cokley <danc@sgm-inc.com> To: "'carlab@co.pitkin.co.us"' <carlab@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Eroncig (95 10 1 A) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:10:29 -0700 X -Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X -Virus -Scanned: amavisd-new at sgm-inc.com X -Processed -By: Rebuild vl.50-1 X -Spam: [F=0.0004184314; B=0.500(0); HS=0.500(1600); S=0.010(2005020401); MH=0.600 (2005032204); R=0.026(sl2/n445)] X -MAIL -FROM: <danc@sgm-inc.com> X -SOURCE -IP: [216.237.77.92] X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Carla I received the new permit and conditions, the answers below should address your concerns; V • The original profile hole depth should be adequate for the proposed design, if not, there is an existing test boring within 50' of the system we could use. HP is researching that boring. If neither of those work, we n have Aspen Earthmoving dig a profile hole outside of the the new bed footprint. HP will prepare a map showing the new perc test location (basically 4 corners of the proposed bed). The !!! temperature at the time of testing ranged from 36 to 37 degrees, adequate for perc testing. ✓lThe bed will be at an increased depth, however the grading above the bed will be adjusted to provide no more than the recommended cover (42" from bottom of bed) over the infiltrator units. A record location and letter will be provided following construction. I will be upvalley on Thursday, and out of the office Friday and Monday. Call me at 379-3378 of you have any questions. Thanks, Dan Cokley, P.E. SCHMUESER GORDON IMEYER c« a I N L[«! I! U 11 v[ YO R 1 1 8 WEST 6TH STREET. SurrE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 8 1601 970-945-1004 / Fix: 970-945-5948 WWW. SGM-INC. COM Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release Date: 2/14/2005 Printed for Carla Block <carlab@ci.aspen.co.us> 3/24/2005 I ay 06/09/02 MON 13:14 FAX 1 970 945 5948 MAY-31-2002 13:05 HOEOTECH GeHcPtech May 30, 2002 James J. Eroncig c/o Peninsula Corporation 2100 Coral Way, Suite 603 Miami, Florida 33145 SCHMOESER GORDON METER He w'orth-f "Isk Gentechnica7, Inc. 5020 County koad 154 Glenwood Sprin s, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-94$988 Fax: 970-945.8954 hpgen@hpgootech.com Job No. 101 803 Subject: Percolation Testing, Proposed Septic Disposal System, 2565 Lower River Road, Pitkin County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Eroncig' As requested by Crystal Barriscale of Barriscale Design Studio, Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc., perfotrned percolation testing at the subject site. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated January 23, 2002, Job No. 101 803. A profile pit and three shallow backhoe pits were excavated on May 23, 2002 at the The test holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) locations shown on Fig were band dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The subsoils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit and consist of about 1 foot of topsoil overlying medium stiff to stiff, sandy to very sandy clay and silt to the pit depth of 8 feet. No free water was observed in the pit and the soils were slightly moist. 1000: P. 02/05 Percolation testing was conducted on May 24. 2002, by a representative of Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. The percolation test results are surant ri7ed on Table 1 The percolation test results indicate an infiltration rate of 60 minutes per inch. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. Pitkin County requires that the system be designed by a professional engineer i 08/03/02 MON 13:15 FAX 1 970 945 5948 MAY -31-2902 13:05 H-&EOTECH James J. Eroncig May 30, 2002 Page 2 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. AOA4-% VOJ � e�Z Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr , P I 9 G Rev. By: DEH FSS�O 4 E� JZA/ksw attachments cc: Barriscale Design Studio - Atm: Crystal Barriscale Bowers Engineering - Attn: Hal Bowers Schmueser Gordon Meyer - Attn: Dan Cokley Styers Construction - Atm: Alan Sryers m()0s P. 03/05 08/03/02 MON 13:15 FAX 1 970 945 5948 MAY -31-2002 13:05 H-AMILiEOTECF SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER SCALE 1' = 60, [MOO4 P. 04/05 ING S- P 2 � Q v \ \ PROFILE PIT \' / \� �\ BORIN 2 \ \ \ RESIDENCE \\\\\ \ 00 1 \ \ \ y BUILDING ENVELOPE \ Y LEGEND P-1 PERCOLATION TEST HOLE FOR CURRENT STUDY ■ PROFILE PIT FOR CURRENT STUDY • EXPLORATORY BORING FROM PREVIOUS STUDY QQ' 101 803 HEPWORTIi-PAWLAKI LOCATION OF PERCOLATION TEST HOLES I Fig, 1 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. m 08/03%02 MOS 13:15 FAX 1 970 945 5948 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER li� 005 MAY -31-2002 13:06 H*OTECH P.05i05 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 1 TABLE I PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 101 803 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on May 23, 2002. Percolation tests were conducted on May 24. 2002. The average percolation rates were based on the last two readings of each test. m WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT ENO OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN.IINCHI HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MINI P-1 31 15 5 41/2 112 GO 41/2 4 112 4 33/4 114 33/4 3 112 114 3 112 3 114 1/4 3 114 3 114 3 2 314 114 2 3/4 2 1/2 1/4 P-2 31 15 S 4 1 s0 4 31/4 314 31/4 3 114 3 2 112 112 2 1/2 2 112 2 1 3/4 114 1 3/4 1 112 1/4 1 112 1 114 114 P,3 31 is 5 411144 3/4 DO 41/4 3 112 314 3 1/2 3 1/4 1/4 3 1/4 2 112 21/2 314 2 114 1/4 2 114 2 1 314 1/4 114 2 1 3/4 1 112 114 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on May 23, 2002. Percolation tests were conducted on May 24. 2002. The average percolation rates were based on the last two readings of each test. m 0 ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS Owner's Name Parcel ID # - House Size (sq. ft.) (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 130 F -6n) S Number of Bedrooms in Main House 6 Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow 1560 State Review Required? no Perc Rate 60 (T) Design Flow (Q) _ # potential bedrooms X 2 people/ bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 2730 Absorption Area (=Q/5 X SQRT perc rate) A = 4229.2978 sq. ft. of absorption area required 273 gravelless chamber units without reduction # of Perc Holes Required: 3.5244148 1 in every soil type? Spaced uniformly over proposed area? A madmum 30% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system, only if the lot size and soil conditions are optimal. If a reduction is being proposed, describe why lot size and soil conditions are optimal: A = 2960.5085 sq.ft. w/30% bed redu n 2114.64891 sq.ft. w/ 50% trench reduction 191 gravell�enches hamber is 136 gravelless chamber units Typeofs m: GAbso DAbsorption beavelless chambers 0Drywell aSeepage Pit DOther (type) Minimum tank capacity 3412.5 gallons SETBACK FR # of feet = f 238.4 SETBACK FRO STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet = 188.4 SETBACK FRO GULCH # of feet = 163.4 Printed on Recycled Paper ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS Owner's Name Parcel ID # House Size (sq. ft.) (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) Number of Bedrooms in Main House Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow 200 State Review Required? no Perc Rate 60(-1) Design Flow (Q) = # potential bedrooms X 2 people/ bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q-- 350 Absorption Area (=Q/5 X SART perc rate) A = 542.21767 sq. ft. of absorption area required 35 gravelless chamber units without reduction # of Perc Holes Required: 3 1 in every soil type? Spaced uniformly over proposed area? A mvdmum 30% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system, only if the lot size and soil conditions are optimal. If a reduction is being proposed, describe why tot size and soil conditions are optimal: A = 379.55237 sq�. w/30% bed reduction 271.108834 sq.ft. w/ 50% trench reduction 24 gra, elless chamber units 17 gravelless chamber units Type of systeni- A orption trenches nAbsorption bed [] Gravelless chambers QDry well aSeepage;F5 (type) Minimum tank capacity SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 100 SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet = 50 SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = 25 Printed on Recyded Paper GePtechTY Ittjjn��(jj, JAN 8 5 2002 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 Countv Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE 2565 LOWER RIVER ROAD PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 101 803 JANUARY 23, 2002 PREPARED FOR: JAMES J. ERONCIG c/o PENINSULA CORPORATION 2100 CORAL WAY, SUITE 603 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33145 0 .• HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. January 23, 2002 James J. Eroncig c/o Peninsula Corporation 2100 Coral Way, Suite 603 Miami, Florida 33145 Job No. 101 803 Subject: Report Transmittal, Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, 2565 Lower River Road, Pitkin County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Eroncig: As requested, we have conducted a subsoil study for the proposed residence at the subject site. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings drilled in the proposed building area consist of about 1/2 foot of topsoil overlying stiff to very stiff sandy silty clay. Relatively dense, silty sand and gravel with subangular fragments of siltstone/sandstone up to cobble size was encountered beneath the clays at depths between 2'/2 and 12 feet. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. The proposed residence can be founded on spread footings placed on the natural subsoils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. JZA/ksw E. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ............................... 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................... 1 SITE CONDITIONS .......................................... 2 FIELD EXPLORATION ....................................... 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ................................... 3 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................. 3 FOUNDATIONS ........................................ 3 FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ..................... 5 FLOOR SLABS ........................................ 6 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ............. :.................... 6 SITE GRADING ........................................ 7 SURFACE DRAINAGE ................................... 8 LIMITATIONS .............................................. 8 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 4 and 5 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 6 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS H -P GEOTECH 3Q 0 0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located at 2565 Lower River Road in Pitkin County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to James J. Eroncig dated December 6, 2001. Interim findings of the subsoil study were presented in a letter dated January 9, 2002, Job No. 101803. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a one and two story wood frame structure over a partial basement/partial crawlspace. The attached garage and basement floors will be slab -on -grade. The remaining floor will be structural over the crawlspace. A tall single story wood frame barn with a dirt floor is proposed to the north of the proposed residence. Grading for the structures is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 4 to 12 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. 33 H -P GEOTECH -2- 0 If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant and covered with about 6 inches of snow at the time of our field work. An existing gravel pit is located to the southwest of the proposed building area. An existing irrigation ditch is located to the northeast of the proposed bam site. The ground surface slopes gently to moderately down to the southwest at grades up to about 6%. The terrain becomes steeper to the southwest of the building area at grades of about 20%. There is about 6 to 8 feet of elevation difference across the proposed residence footprint. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds. A few cobbles are exposed on the ground surface. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on January 4, 2002. Three exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck -mounted Longyear BK-51HD drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 13/8 inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. H -P GEOTECH 3q 0 -3- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Fig. 2. The subsoils consist of about '/2 foot of topsoil overlying stiff to very stiff sandy silty clay. Relatively dense, silty sand and gravel with subangular fragments of siltstone/sandstone up to cobble size was encountered beneath the clay at depths between 21h and 12 feet down to the maximum depth explored, 21 feet. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content, density, Atterberg limits and gradation analyses. Results of consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples of the clay and silty sand soils, presented on Figs. 4 and 5, generally indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and loading and a minor expansion potential when wetted under a constant light surcharge. The sample from Boring 3 at 2'/2 feet showed no expansion and moderate compressibility upon increased loading after wetting. Results of a gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive samples (minus 1 V2 inch fraction) of the natural coarse granular soils are shown on Fig. 6. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 3`s H -P GEOTECH i i — / 7110 T� i \ / 7,00 \ \ \ Y BUILDING ENVELOPE \ y SCALE I" = 60' 101 803 I GEO EC NICALHEPWORTH—PAW NC. AK I LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS I Fig. 1 3(D BORING 1 BORING 2 BORING 3 ELEV.= 7102' ELEV.= 7106' ELEV.= 7114' 7115 7110 7080 19/12 WC -4.9 DD -110 37/12 7115 7110 7105 7105 � I C O I 0 0 2 d w 7100 /12 18/12 v a� WC 7.1 7100 DD -101 J-200-79 LL -28 +4=26 PI -14 24/12 WC -7.9 7095 DD -104 /12 20/4,10/0 WC=3.2 DD=131 y 7090 /12 .4` a 29/12 7090 WC -9.0 DD=112 7085 -200-57 _a 35/12 7080 19/12 WC -4.9 DD -110 37/12 7115 7110 /6,15/0 7085 7080 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Fig. 3. 101 803 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 2 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. .ae 7105 � n/t,10/o •o: I 0 2 /12 v a� 7100 w 51/12 +4=26 —200=32 7095 /12 A` y 58/12 /12 7090 /6,15/0 7085 7080 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Fig. 3. 101 803 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 2 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND: ® TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, organic, slightly moist, reddish brown. ©CLAY (CL); silty, sandy, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist, reddish brown, slightly calcareous, low to medium plasticity. SAND AND GRAVEL (SM—GM); silty, slighty clayey, medium dense to dense, slightly moist, fragments of siltstone/sandstone up to cobble size. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. California liner sample. ■ Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. /r12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 18 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on January 4, 2002 with a 4—inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve. —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve. LL = Liquid Limit ( 7 ) PI = Plasticity Index ( 7. ) 101 803I HEPWORTH—PAWLAK I LEGEND AND NOTES GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Fig. 3 0 SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER ENGINEERS S SURVEYORS February 6, 2002 Revised May 7, 2002 Carla Block Pitkin County Environmental Health 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10 Aspen CO 81611 RE: Aspen, Colorado Residence, ISDS Dear Nancy; 0 GLENWOOD SPRINGS 1 I6 W, 6TH, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 8 160 1 970-945 1 004 FX'. 970-945-5948 ASPEN CRESTED BUTTE P.O. BOX 21 55 P.O. BOX 3088 ASPEN. CO 61612 CRESTED BUTTE. CO 61 224 970-925-6727 970-349-5355 FX: 970-925-41 57 1.. 970-349.5358 The purpose of this letter is to provide a submittal for an ISDS application for the Eroncig Residence, Lot 1, Murry Subdivision, located on Lower River Road in Pitkin County, Colorado. Please find attached a completed application form, application fee, design drawings and foundation soils information. Since we began this project in January, we were unable to complete a profile hole and percolation testing due to the County's winter testing restrictions. I have attached soils information compiled for the Foundation Geotechnical study. Based upon this information, I have assume�ervative percolation rate based upon removing the clay soil layer and penetrating the gravels layer with the absorption level of the leachfield. I would also like to note that I have based the well setback on the State's calculation of design flow (1650 gpd) rather than Pitkin County flowrate. The State setback of 152' is more than adequate to ensure the well will be protected from contamination by the ISDS. I am lacking well water quality/quantity information that should be forthcoming within two weeks. I will forward that information to you once we have received it. We ask for your consideration in reviewing this application as submitted, and applying any conditions you may feel necessary. Construction is not planned to start until the summer season. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or comments regarding this submittal. Sincerely, �� "' ' ' ' •" Schmueser Gordon nc Dan Cokley, P.E. �'3IONA\- CC: Crystal Barriscale, 369 South Morning Sun Avenue, Mill Valley, CA 94941 LADJ095101 A_isds_appZdoc 39 Feb -14-02 03:38P P.02 FPOf1 SNOFJNRSS w S PHONE NO. : 9709236271 Feb. 1.3 2002 03:2�Wll Pl , .\ \.-, , � �,. .' l r. .�l:'•Inl C} 1'NSI.'�..flF �d :.l �) \ •'Nt ih9 ,((�.�`= :I ,. - .. L I .N,\\ )o -a •. I fug t� i - � I I ) LiN� ., >. l•: �. 1 _ -..;` r `I ')r Cmi I My i '•'�f C� \ �. c11 P 1�1(. Y'y,�F�i ,. . i •. 1, STANDARD IACTEXR)tOGK K MVITER F63T SMW DMASS WAT61A l SAIRTa1FDN DISTRICT R.O. 60A SIDD - SNOWMAS/ VILLAGE. CO 11@13 RAVIIE •!R!x OAT[ ✓�� TRAF ( COVr.v'r�ztM SAM." f,f_ �•L{S�1i �a�— [QQ�GnOwIMI wC]IDUM y(j( ( 7 NFiN GOMN'MUNITY L r 1 I ROMnNE DOTROUTKIN 3r8TEM w-OPLr 1 )GN SCK kAmPLE p WRIp 1 IOTIKw +U3uG I IR(N, p�QQ ORSOCE �wa�vArE IISACCIAI RUTlVOSE 4)MMPACE 6RIIRLE "MOT[ ultllMUwWTIpMYNOT @IMBUED. THE SAMRLC"" SE DISCARDED REMARKS It6n1mN TO AoDRE66 CIIV-STATE RMON6 4 ICC RRv[R![IOR �yIl VuLhDM 4sUx0 MS}RNCIIpI�1 AMD `--` Q� D(ilMlpw( G i t0 ZOEI{.�?R1C/L'S `%• �6E�oF-Iwhcs M1/ AIMFTETIVART h ALS/-UtlwrA MR1[rsTA'RFpI �. FORTU? O RESIATC COULEIITSR,V ti RY E FS[N• lNARMx61KlER FORM/[ NT REWUS OIIFATER hAN M COLJDAM RFK I� K DVK:ATF(xpx e IRNRIIMDRRINIID MATER ATA MIfR NOT NWITEW ) MTS IArt\AL RKEN[0 DArtL-�%O1�-TWE 3'00 a,R(T P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 yl F- LA L4NCAINELLAI Almo /ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING CONSULUM1115 February 11, 2002 Mr. James . Eroncig Peninsul Corporation 5701 Su set Drive, Suite302 Miami, L 33143 RE: Eroncig Well Test Dear Mr. Eroncig: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax RE�y�vE� EEg1�1o�v ENN��,MEN PNµ�P�jN This report presents the findings of the water well test performed by Zancanella and Associates, Inc. for your proposed single family residence. Figure 1 shows the general location of the property and the approximate location of the Well. A pump test of Eroncig well was conducted on February 8, 2002 by Samuelson Pump Company utilizing an electric submersible pump and a generator. The well was pumped at a continuous rate of 16.5 gallons per minute (gpm) throughout the test. It was pumped continuously for a 4 hour period at this rate. The drawdown and time data collected during the test are presented in Table 1. We have plotted the results of the test in a drawdown vs. time curve as shown on the attached Figure 2. The maximum drawdown during the 4- hourtest was measured at 56.75 feet. The well displayed continuous drawdown with time. Projecting the drawdown rate, the well would be able to pump continuously for several days. At all times during the test the water level stayed well above the pump intake at 140 feet. Recovery data for the well following the pump test were collected for a 30 minute period after the pumping stopped. The recovery data are also summarized in Table 1. The recovery plotted as residual drawdown is shown in Figure 4. Based on the residual drawdown curve, the well displayed normal recovery characteristics. The pump test indicates thatwill probably be able to operate for extended periods at the rate of approximate yl�h12 gpm nd will be adequate to serve a single family residence. It is our under � g that the well will be used to serve a single family luxury lot with up to 14,250 square feet of outside irrigation. The proposed diversion and consumptive use estimates for the property are contained in Table 2. A water sample test will be collected Monday, February 11, 2002 and delivered to the Snowmass Sanitation District for independent analyses for bacteria. Results of the tests, will be available Tuesday or Wednesday. 0 0 If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella and Associates, Inc. Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E. Attachments Z:\96000's\96322\W aterSupply-letter.wpd 2 0 Well ID: Enoncig Well #1 Job No.: 16322 Client: James Eroncig Test By: Samuelson Analysis By: BCP/TAZ M.P. = Top of Casing TABLE 1 Pump Test Data 0 a = 16.5 gpm = ft S.W.L.= 127.67 ft b= ft Time/Date on: 2/8/02 3:10 PM Time/Dale off: 2/8/02 7:10 PM projected Test Length: 4:00:00 total time REAL TIME Time (minutes) W.L. Measurement Drawdown (feet) Q ( m) I. minutes t/t' (feet) (inches) 2/8/02 3:10 PM 0 127 8.00 SWL 16.5 2/8/02 3:11 PM 1 139 1.00 11.42 16.5 2/8/02 3:12 PM 2 145 5.50 17.79 16.5 2/8/02 3:13 PM 3 149 5.25 21.77 16.5 2/8/02 3:14 PM 4 153 2.00 25.50 16.5 2/8/02 3:15 PM 5 155 10.50 28.21 16.5 2/8/02 3:16 PM 6 157 10.50 30.21 16.5 2/8/02 3:18 PM 8 159 1 11.25 32.27 16.5 2/8/02 3:20 PM 10 161 7.00 33.92 16.5 2/8/02 3:22 PM 12 164 3.00 36.58 16.5 2/8/02 3:25 PM 15 167 6.00 39.83 16.5 2/8/02 3:30 PM 20 171 1.00 43.42 16.5 2/8/02 3:40 PM 30 176 1.00 48.42 16.5 2/8/02 3:50 PM 40 178 5.00 50.75 16.5 2/8/02 4:00 PM 50 1 179 5.50 1 51.79 16.5 2/8/02 4:10 PM 60 11 179 10.00 1 52.17 16.5 2/8/02 4:40 PM 90 11 180 10.00 53.17 16.5 2/8/02 5:10 PM 120 11 181 11.75 54.31 16.5 2/8/02 6:10 PM 180 11 183 8.00 56.00 16.5 2/8/02 7:10 PM 240 184 5.00 56.75 16.5 2/8/02 7:11 PM 241 170 5.50 42.79 0.0 1 241 2/8/02 7:12 PM 242 161 5.50 33.79 0.0 2 121 2/8/02 7:13 PM 243 157 2.50 29.54 0.0 3 81 2/8/02 7:14 PM 244 153 10.25 26.19 0.0 4 61 2/8/02 7:15 PM 245 149 10.50 22.21 0.0 5 49 2/8/02 7:16 PM 246 147 1 2.00 19.50 0.0 1 6 1 41 2/8/02 7:18 PM 248 143 1 0.00 15.33 0.0 1 8 1 31 L( 2110/02 Zancanella B Associates, Inc Well# I PumpTest..ds O CL O L a _m U C O W N CN C CV d � 47 t0 r C; NN LL d CJ CD CD r R N W 4q 11 N N v v m C m C a til O O Ill Cl O m 0 0 017 Or � 9 c E a ❑ C `a 0 L 2 a O°avUa lEcE Nn W c t o O o m.6 0 d Q = Q U C v C' u n v OI N C a 0 0 0 e O a O C O O 0 0 E a a n u �. E -@ aim aT E a c E U c muJi co E qC a n o c a Oo E c U rn o rm N _ V a m 2 3 'a 0666111 aaac CL U Sc �c = 2 U J U OI y G' O�N�In'1NN�00 C E c U a E TQ� a a c E Uc a '9 O 7C _ E C aN N C V W dN d Uc m o 27 c S Ir N N a m E a �n qC Oo m `o u O�N�In'1NN�00 N C N S N N S S r 0 m O O a N q c C' m S S S S SSS S S S a^ q O O O E o— c E c U o U g SSS O ma- - 0 0 0 S 0 -E mA . 000000000000 d O q U a a J O O O 0 0 0 0 O u =E=°,A ood000000coo o. a c U d maou MWOMMMOM M SSSSOSS$0 rl O C q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O a �?oE ce «mmm�rlc�e 0 0 0 N 17 O N N 0 0 m= m m m m m m m vnl n of m ��d' n m .o o 000�oly N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N C q C? -7- — a ly m 000000006660 r N a d C d_==,F 008000000888 0 o Eemmu =Elm 00 000000000000 000000._ 0 O a E c E o O O— n g C O O O p S 17 N O m N< O p S p S m m U m O 0000000000 O O 0 0N 0N d o 0 0 0° p OZ p SSSOSSSSSo8S p p p p O " E m 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 O C U U d in r N n to r i 0 n n m r 0 r N E_ u q o 0 0000 0 0 9000 m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 O LL Q m 0 Z❑ C Q Lower River RO`edj� 2 Erondq Well #1 51175m,l it Ii fill 4L-/" I\, p, 4� Ero s Eli Cerise Ditch F� i anclie a :, F-epk 9 S. Figure 1 Eroncig Property General Location Map Zancenella & Assoc. #96322 6/96 - Figure 2 - - - Eroncig Well #1 4 Hour Pumping Test on 2/8/02 Time (min) 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 0 20 40 60 80 100 m 120 140 160 180 200 220 2/10/02 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Well#1PumpTest.xls D = 66.5 gpm throughout lest Static Water Level = 127.7 ft ------------------------------------------------------------- 7 T I i II I Pump set at 220'. ' - i Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Well#1PumpTest.xls Figure 3 Eroncig Well #1 Recovery as Residual Drawdown Following 4 -Hr. Pump Test on 2/8/02 t/t, 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 0 5 10 15 U 20 0 25 LL d 30 ILLd 35 40 p` 45 50 55 2110/02 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. W ell# 1 PumpTest.>ds 0 0 I i ' I � i' 2110/02 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. W ell# 1 PumpTest.>ds 0 0 I 2000 GALLON CONCRETE TANK USED AS PUMPING CHAMBER 2000 GALLON UNBAFFLED CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK PROPOSED WELL LOCATION PROVIDE A MINUMIM 10' SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER SERVICE LINES AS SHOWN OR ENCASE SEWER AT CROSSINGS PER DETAIL / 152' SETBACK TO LEACHFIELD 50' SETBACK TO SEPTI ANK WATER SERVICE LINE TO HOUSE en nhole 4" PVC ASTM 3034 AT\' MIN. 1/4" PER FT. x +X X#515 Rekar & Cap Marked t�S27638 1.5" CLASS 160 PVC LEVEL HEADER PIPE I \ � U ABSORPTION FIELD — SEE DETAIL ABSORPTION AREA MUST PENETRATE THROUGH CLAY LAYER AND INTO GRAVELS LAYER. VERIFY PERC RATE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REGRADING AS REQUIRED TOP OF BED TO MAINTAIN MAX. COVER REQUIREMENT OF 42" ABOVE ABSORPTION LEVEL OF SYSTEM. R I\ 10' LINED DITCH 100' SETBACK \— 5 4 20' BLDG. // SETBACK / e` p �Q�`,* \ ID NC I PROPOSED DITCH ALIGNMENT MAXIMUM 42" COVER 2:1 SLOPE MAXIMUM EXISTING CLAY LAYER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING GRADE DIDI VERTDRAINAGE_ AR_ LEACHFIELD AREA 1.5" Class 160 perforated PVC, 1/8" holes at 60" C -C. r- Provide downward facing hole every fifth hole. Provide end cap. NA 77 BACKFILL GRA VE'--- L S C 3' TYP. 101 U SEWER LINE TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF ONE JOINT (18" MINIMUM) OF C-900 PVC, DR -18 PIPE, CENTERED ON WATER LINE FOR PERPENDICULAR CROSSING. FOR SKEW CROSSINGS USE C-900 PIPE UNTIL HORIZONTAL SEPARATION EXCEEDS 10' ALTERNATIVE IS CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF SEWER. SEWER / WATER CROSSING NTS — FINISHED GRADE - SLOPE AT MIN 2% ACROSS FIELD HIGH CAPACITY Infiltrator Unit L— LEVEL t0.1', SCARIFY PRIOR TO PLACING SAND LEACHFIELD SECTION 0 MINIMUM 24" COVER I VICINITY MAP GENERAL NOTES - 1. Al/ materials, installation practices, setback requirements, etc., shall comply with the Pitkin County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations. 2. The absorption bed shall be constructed so that the bottom level +/- 0.1 inches. Provide positive drainage away from the bed. J. The location of the bed may be field adjusted to better fit the site, provided all setbacks are met. 4. Piping to system shall be 3" CLASS 160 PVC solid wall pipe. Piping in units shall be 1.5" Class 160 perforated PVC. 5. The area disturbed by construction shall be reseeded with native grosses to prevent erosion. 6. Use risers as needed to bring septic tank access hatch within 6"" of finished grade. 7 The Contractor and Owner shall take whatever measures are necessary to assure that a) the septic tank and sewer lines are completely water tight to prevent infiltration of groundwater into the system, and b) the system is installed to prevent freezing of gravity sewer lines. S. The Engineer and Pitkin County shall be notified when construction commences and kept abreast of the construction progress so that sufficient inspection can be performed to assure conformance with these plans. 9. It is the Contractors responsibility to verify all locations of utilities that may affect location of facilities drawn. Verification is to be made with the Owner and the affected utility company. 10. Substitution of materials (i.e. pipe, tanks, etc.) is acceptable provided verification and acceptance by the Engineer and the Pitkin County is made. 11. The location and elevation of the existing sewer shall be field verified. 12. If water usage assumptions are other than shown, please contact engineer. In addition, if water intensive fixtures are installed other than typical domestic water fixtures also contact engineer. DESIGN CALCULATIONS (REVISED3 / 21 / 2005) - _ ti 1. 6 BEDROOM HOME, ASSUME 2 PERSONS/BEDROOM AND 130 GPCD. SCH 80 PVC PIPE HORSE BARN WITH FOUR STALLS AND WASHING FACILITY, 50 GPD/HORSE ALARM AND 20'" DIA. RISER PIPE 2. a. DETERMINE PITKIN COUNTY DESIGN FLOW: & FITTINGS FOR PUMP & TANK PIPING Q = 1.75 x [(2 PER/BR)x(6 BR)x(130 GPCD) + (4 HORSES)x(50 GPHD)] = 3080 GPD b. DETERMINE STATE DESIGN FLOW FOR WELL SETBACK PURPOSE: L2 L 11,52 Q = 1.50 x [(2 PER/BR)x(6 BR)x(75 GPCD) + (4 HORSES)x(50 GPHD)] = 1650 GPD WELL SETBACK = 100' + (8' x 650/100) = 152' BREAKER FOR 3. DETERMINE SEPTIC TANK SIZE: BREAKER FOR PUMP 3080 GPD X 30 HOURS D.T./24 = 3850 GALLONS ALARM INSTALL (2) 2000 GALLON CONCRETE TANKS 4. ALLOWABLE LOADING RATES: DESIGN FOR ABSORPTION METHOD OF TO FLCA ALARM CONTROL EFFLUENT DISPOSAL. BASED UPON SOILS TESTING BY HP GEOTECH INC., PERC RATE TO BE 60 MPI PER HP GEO REPORT DATED 5/30/02. BACK FLOAT SWITCH 5. DETERMINE BED SIZE: -: A = Q [SQRT(T)] / 5 SOLID GROUND A = 3080 GPD [SQRT(30)] / 5 JBIO-5 PVC BOX A = 3374 SQ. FT. w VICINITY MAP GENERAL NOTES - 1. Al/ materials, installation practices, setback requirements, etc., shall comply with the Pitkin County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations. 2. The absorption bed shall be constructed so that the bottom level +/- 0.1 inches. Provide positive drainage away from the bed. J. The location of the bed may be field adjusted to better fit the site, provided all setbacks are met. 4. Piping to system shall be 3" CLASS 160 PVC solid wall pipe. Piping in units shall be 1.5" Class 160 perforated PVC. 5. The area disturbed by construction shall be reseeded with native grosses to prevent erosion. 6. Use risers as needed to bring septic tank access hatch within 6"" of finished grade. 7 The Contractor and Owner shall take whatever measures are necessary to assure that a) the septic tank and sewer lines are completely water tight to prevent infiltration of groundwater into the system, and b) the system is installed to prevent freezing of gravity sewer lines. S. The Engineer and Pitkin County shall be notified when construction commences and kept abreast of the construction progress so that sufficient inspection can be performed to assure conformance with these plans. 9. It is the Contractors responsibility to verify all locations of utilities that may affect location of facilities drawn. Verification is to be made with the Owner and the affected utility company. 10. Substitution of materials (i.e. pipe, tanks, etc.) is acceptable provided verification and acceptance by the Engineer and the Pitkin County is made. 11. The location and elevation of the existing sewer shall be field verified. 12. If water usage assumptions are other than shown, please contact engineer. In addition, if water intensive fixtures are installed other than typical domestic water fixtures also contact engineer. DESIGN CALCULATIONS (REVISED3 / 21 / 2005) - _ ti 1. 6 BEDROOM HOME, ASSUME 2 PERSONS/BEDROOM AND 130 GPCD. SCH 80 PVC PIPE HORSE BARN WITH FOUR STALLS AND WASHING FACILITY, 50 GPD/HORSE ALARM AND 20'" DIA. RISER PIPE 2. a. DETERMINE PITKIN COUNTY DESIGN FLOW: & FITTINGS FOR PUMP & TANK PIPING Q = 1.75 x [(2 PER/BR)x(6 BR)x(130 GPCD) + (4 HORSES)x(50 GPHD)] = 3080 GPD b. DETERMINE STATE DESIGN FLOW FOR WELL SETBACK PURPOSE: L2 L 11,52 Q = 1.50 x [(2 PER/BR)x(6 BR)x(75 GPCD) + (4 HORSES)x(50 GPHD)] = 1650 GPD WELL SETBACK = 100' + (8' x 650/100) = 152' BREAKER FOR 3. DETERMINE SEPTIC TANK SIZE: BREAKER FOR PUMP 3080 GPD X 30 HOURS D.T./24 = 3850 GALLONS ALARM INSTALL (2) 2000 GALLON CONCRETE TANKS 4. ALLOWABLE LOADING RATES: DESIGN FOR ABSORPTION METHOD OF TO FLCA ALARM CONTROL EFFLUENT DISPOSAL. BASED UPON SOILS TESTING BY HP GEOTECH INC., PERC RATE TO BE 60 MPI PER HP GEO REPORT DATED 5/30/02. BACK FLOAT SWITCH 5. DETERMINE BED SIZE: -: A = Q [SQRT(T)] / 5 SOLID GROUND A = 3080 GPD [SQRT(30)] / 5 JBIO-5 PVC BOX A = 3374 SQ. FT. w ALLOWED 309; REDUCTION FOR INFILTRATOR BED 3374 SQ. FT. * 70% = 2362 SQ. FT. LOCA TEDLdp 2362 S.F. / 9.2 S.F. PER INFILTRATOR = 257 QUICK 4 STANDARD INFILTRATOR UNITS REQUIRED ' TANK ALERT 11 PLUS INSTALL SINGLE BED, EACH 11 ROWS OF 25 INFILTRATOR UNITS EACH (275 UNITS) ORERGROUND (QUICK 4 STANDARD INFILTRATOR SIZE = 3' X 4') 4"" PVC SLOPE O 1/4" PER FT. MIN. 6. DETERMINE DOSING VOLUME: MINIMUM OF 4 DOSES/DAY; VOLUME < 770 GALLONS 7. DETERMINE EFFLUENT PUMP REQUIREMENTS: EFFLUENT PUMP TYPE & SIZE PUMP TO BE CAPABLE OF 69 GPM AND 43 FT OF HEAD (TO BE CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK VERIFIED BASED UPON FINAL SYSTEM LAYOUT AND PRIOR TO APPROVED BY ENGINEER s , ORDERING MATERIALS) TA CONCRETE SEPTIC NK - ORENCO SYSTEMS PEF 150 OR EQUAL ( 8'" CONCRETE BLOCK X#/16-3 CONDUCTOR CORD TO PUMP STRAIN RELIEF X#f 4-2 CONDUCTOR CABLE FOR ALARM CONTROL J5114-2 CONDUCTOR CABLE W/GROUND WIRE -TO ALARM FLOAT USE X#/12-2 CONDUCTOR W/ GROUND IF OVER 60" WIRING CONNECTIONS FOR ALARM BOX & AWS -1 LEVEL CONTROL ALLOW EXTRA CABLE ON POWER & ALARM CABLES TO REMOVE PUMP & PIPING W/OUT DISCONNECTING PUMP WIRING TO CIRCUIT UNDERGROUND CABLES FOR BREAKER PANEL M PUMP & ALARM CONTROL ti SCH 80 PVC PIPE ALARM AND 20'" DIA. RISER PIPE W & FITTINGS FOR PUMP & TANK PIPING _ CONNECTION BOX 75 AMP CIRCUIT L2 L 11,52 15 AMP CIRCUIT 5" MIN -CLASS -- BREAKER FOR 15 wrc: vwrs BREAKER FOR PUMP J/16-2 CONDUCTOR CORD ALARM WIDE ANGLE PIGGY TO FLCA ALARM CONTROL WASTE LINE FROM HOUSE I BAFFLE 4" PVC . BACK FLOAT SWITCH S,1 ELECTRO MODEL -: p 1/4 "" PUM ; co SOLID GROUND VENT SYSTEM JBIO-5 PVC BOX ALARM BOX w ASTM 3034 BETWEEN - PUMP OFF LOCA TEDLdp TANKS & HOUSE RFLLAAIEDT ABLE ' TANK ALERT 11 PLUS IN HOUSE E��EY ROUND ORERGROUND X#/16-3 CONDUCTOR CORD TO PUMP STRAIN RELIEF X#f 4-2 CONDUCTOR CABLE FOR ALARM CONTROL J5114-2 CONDUCTOR CABLE W/GROUND WIRE -TO ALARM FLOAT USE X#/12-2 CONDUCTOR W/ GROUND IF OVER 60" WIRING CONNECTIONS FOR ALARM BOX & AWS -1 LEVEL CONTROL ALLOW EXTRA CABLE ON POWER & ALARM CABLES TO REMOVE PUMP & PIPING W/OUT DISCONNECTING PUMP WIRING TO CIRCUIT UNDERGROUND CABLES FOR BREAKER PANEL M PUMP & ALARM CONTROL TYPICAL INSTALLATION OF TANKS. PUMP 8r. CONTROLS N L S. U O SCH 80 PVC PIPE ALARM AND 20'" DIA. RISER PIPE ASTM3034 BETWEEN & FITTINGS FOR PUMP & TANK PIPING _ CONNECTION BOX TANKS & HOUSE 24" DIA. RISER PIPE 5" MIN -CLASS -- 160 PVC PIPE TO BED .. _..,. .... ... SLOPE TO DRAIN BACK TO TANK (SIZE AS PER PLAN) WASTE LINE FROM HOUSE I BAFFLE 4" PVC . ASTM .3034 TO CONNECTS TO HOUSE -: p 1/4 "" PUM ; co SOLID GROUND VENT SYSTEM PER FT MIN. DRILL 1/4" DIA. HOLE ASTM 3034 BETWEEN - PUMP OFF IN BOTTOM OF PIPE TANKS & HOUSE ' TANK ALERT 11 PLUS E= - --'"' SYSTEM FLOAT (BY S✓ ELECTRO SYSTEMS) 4"" PVC SLOPE O 1/4" PER FT. MIN. EFFLUENT PUMP TYPE & SIZE CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK OUT EXISTING HOLE APPROVED BY ENGINEER s , TA CONCRETE SEPTIC NK I. INS 4" DIA. HOLE ( 8'" CONCRETE BLOCK ABOVE TANK BOTTOM B" AB USED AS DOSING TANK P n!\ TYPICAL INSTALLATION OF TANKS. PUMP 8r. CONTROLS N L S. U O