Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.eh.264309101001 (2001)Document Layout (From Most Recent to Oldest Permit) Permit Application Log Sheet/Notes & Photos Communications As -built Design Engineer Design Soil Information Water Permit & Information Second System on property Third System .etc. Floor Plans Please See Building and Land Use Approvals Files for additional information. Permit # 99022 Asitkin Environmental Health Depart Perm.:or an Individual Sewage Disposal Sys0_ 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070/FAX 970-920-5197 Parcel ID # 2643-091-01-001 Type of permit New( X ) Repair( ) Addition to House( ) Name of Owner Jeffrey Kenner Street Address Property legal description Size of lot 16.54 acres Lot 1, Aspen Valley Downs J Total square footage of the house 7,772 Water source Aspen Valley Downs Water System # of bedrooms in house 4 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house Caretaker unit 1 Total square footage of the caretaker unit 790 # of bedrooms in caretaker unit 1 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in caretaker unit Designed for what # rooms (list) 4 BR's in main Residence, Office not to be used as a BR + 2 for detached Caretaker + Garage and Pool buildings each sized based on a use of 15 people per day at 10 gallons /person / day Permit information Designed by Church and Associates, Inc. Mailing Address 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Perc rate 41 Profile hole depth 10' Depth to groundwater or bedrock 6.5 it sandstone bedrock Septic tank capacity need 3588 gallon total Absorption area 3,675 sq ft Septic permit approved per Comments design and specifications dated April 23, 1999. Per the engineer design, the maximum depth of the bottom of infiltrator units cannot exceed 2.5 feet. due to the sandstone bedrock at 6.5 feet. All setbacks must be maintained. The setback from the absorption field to an unlined pond is 200 ft Permit approved by: t Date: �� �,,/ , f2x..iq 4C d+ .C� 4' cGn..Qtn_ 9, / 199 ne .e+-' �`'�-s d°' rpp^i'"t Plans and specifications/bf the proposed individual sewage disposal system hake been reviewed ancgre considered jk�` satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pil: County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -built drawings must be Included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Installer: ' U � Final inspection approval: Date: 'S 010i VI>_ { 7 /I o / 0 D t+' * 1.�4 rrLUI �' / 2 .c�,u ,s✓r.+Z, &`+r -(x � O I \ :j/31/ o u N , ps.tc�i" �►> n ✓ a/L1 ARA 1 db Ll 1 4A, "l+.�if �v, �i rr� yr �^xw� t4l' 644 xt..6.-fc« 4 c Y,,/ 7 /�% ` t -it ju,,�.s�'.�i-z.�se-�� ,ra. ^-/leo � �er�.. ,�*-�- �-�al, 1rH _-, ��e�- - -; �.�,_,o..�.,._ ,a,�:�� �-.o x,,20 f,� .�� a � f ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPLICATION I& INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSALMPTEM 130 alera SL, Aspen Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970-d40-50319 Name of OWNER Owner's Maiiing Address Primary Contact Person (all communication regarding this permit will go through this person) Name HOW -171( Tl-IUv"PtoN Company TV4UNor.2 CptvSTl L3C-Ttotj Contact Mailing Address r-0, ZSOX 4IS41 ASPE.ta CO- 81to12 Business Phone: 923-411-f Call Phone: 31114-- i Fax q2.'5-ozZ Parcel ID # (available from assessor's office at 9203160 or at www.aspen.com/assessor/) 'L (a 4- 3 , O 9 1 Street address of property RUNNI racy lmmletc RD Legal Description: Lot 1 Block Filing Subdivision EK3 VAI,%,E POLOO.% $IU6l.b Size of lot 1&.5+ acres. Type of imposed structure: egvytyg._ Sc=_ of bldg. enve!epe: 2 .D I. 4 cc�S i Total square feet of house lF R of bedrooms in house _ of offices, lots & simflar.sized rooms in house Caretaker Unit Attached ( ) Detached ( X ) Total area(sq. ft) of caretaker unit 190 tA P.r. # of bedrooms in caretaker unit 1 T of offices. lofts and similar size rooms of caretaker unit -1C permit is for New Home (X) Repair due' o failure ( ) Remcdel/Addition ( ) Emergency use ( ) Water. Private well ( ) Spring ( ) Stream ( ) Community/Public Water System O If community system: Name of system Asp aN vDo,4 The fee for a ISDS application is 5330 for a permit that takes 5 hours or less for the department to approve. If approval takes longer than 6 hours, a rate of $55 per hour will be charged. The maximum fee is 57000. The basic fee of 5330 is due at the time of application. The remainder, if any, will be due in two stages: first, at tae time of issuance of the ISDS permit second, before . - final approval of the ISDS permit Application for an individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accurate information on locations of all existing and proposed wells, contour intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes. waterlines, springs, sucten or irrigation lines, drinking water cistems, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, watercourses, streams, floodplain, dry gulches, and existing septic systems. I hereby certify that any such features not shown on attached site map are not present Issuance of the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may be undertaken until all approvals and permits have been obtained. The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department, Pitkin County and employees of these agencies will be held harmless should the individual sewage disposal system fail or malfunction. The permit to construct is issued an information submitted by the applicant or his/her representatives. The owner assumes full responsibility in case of failure of the system. Signature of applicant Date a� Receivedby ! IA(r7ee O/1 Receipt # r3 71 Date �- -7— 3 MAIO a046 72��0 1 OoI. N 46i�.(0�1�;{ If35eao fC/¢�&�Z�lD.tt� '� ('O w j o rJ 5►1� W2: 1,�k SyST l6fJ b11� R�t'OP�C vjn* FC -5, TO WV44. A0 0 CHURCH & Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS February 28, 2001 Bill Poss & Associates 605 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Subject: Installation Observation, Proposed Kenner Residence Lot 1, Aspen Valley Downs Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 10777 Gentlemen: As requested, we observed the installation of the onsite wastewater system (OWS) for the subject site on September 21, 1999 and April 3, 2000. The system was designed under our Job No. 10777, dated April 23, 1999, and revised December 9, 1999. The system includes the installation of two 1000 -gallon single -compartment tanks; one 2000 -gallon single - compartment tank; and one 1500 -gallon, two-compartment, precast septic tank. A dosing siphon was placed in the second compartment of the 1500 -gallon tank. Twelve chamber -beds were installed, each having 2 rows of 6 chambers, for a total of 168 chambers. A distribution box was installed to distribute effluent evenly to the fields. The distribution box is large enough to handle the dose from the dosing chamber. An as -built drawing is included as Figure 1. The components of the OWS were installed in conformance with our plans and specifications. If there are questions or if we may be of further service, please call. Sincerely, CHURCH and Z�70 Edward O. t EOC/trp/erb 2 copies sent Copy to APEHD, Attn: Nancy MacKenzie RECEIVED MAR 0 5 ZUU1 PITKW COUNTY ERi1 R01etTAL HEALTH DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 LOVELAND 970.663.2124 S 0 0 CHURCH & Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS July 6, 2000 Bill Poss & Associates 605 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Subject: Installation Observation, Proposed Denner Residence Lot 1, Aspen Valley Downs Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 10777 Gentlemen: As requested, we observed the installation of the onsite wastewater system (OWS) for the subject site on September 21, 1999 and April 3, 2000. The system was designed under our Job No. 10777, dated April 23, 1999, and revised December 9, 1999. The system includes the installation of two 1000 -gallon single -compartment tanks; one 2000 -gallon single - compartment tank; and one 1500 -gallon, two-compartment, precast septic tank. A dosing siphon was placed in the second compartment of the 1500 -gallon tank. Twelve chamber -beds were installed, each having 2 rows of 6 chambers, for a total of 168 chambers. An as -built drawing is included as Figure 1. The components of the OWS were installed in conformance with our plans and specifications. If there are any questions or if we may be of further service, please call. Sincerely, CHURCH and Associates, O. Church, P.E. i ;� 13172 EOC/trp 2 copies sent copy to APEHD, Attn: Nancy MacKenzie copy to Aspen Earth Moving, Attn: Ty Duer, 818 Industry PI., Carbondale, CO 81623 DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 / 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 F SCALE 50,' 26( GRA INF 12 CH,o JOB NO. 10777 VIUURE 1 • 0 Tim Pea, Kenner Lot 1 Aspen Valley Downs, running Mare Rd To: Tim Petz <tpetz@geo-church com> From: Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen co.us> Subject. Kenner Lot 1 Aspen Valley Downs, running ning Mare Rd Cc: Bcc: Attached: Tim, We need a new as -built letter for this one. Our concern was the small distribution box. Please state that the one installed is large enough to handle the dose. Thanks, Nancy Printed for Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> • 04-21-1999 09:20AM FROM C CH & Associates, Inc NANO,(' I C)rA TO 0 19709205074 P.02 M'+t we gEgtGN THE KENt eR RESIDENCE 'IAS Lopiq sF MAw HousE Zeus yY2x)30x1 = I62C2 / z27S CARETPgCER 2 (BEDS �- S �. 7 ,- S a s �E -ems 4 -1 % `1S x 1.-7 = 1050 7s -_ �eZ• 7;- � Gpo f BSD a� 170TAL LoAlb%r ; = 3(vy0 GPD • 7 pvQ TANK LA`{dV—j is O1J SIG 7. /}Nti Sr+o%ji-q 'Now Coo Clea rY 7)t -EASE Co'v)ME07- 1 (03)1 y(-3-9317 MY (303) y(,3-932 t , N� AmLK)n i i+ k You SE:NS� NG -VAE• ate. THAT WAS YOU -to "rN WV - TOTAL V - TOTAL P.02 Nom"(/0 ,,,"(/0 a 9-70 -9zo , ;�i KK�' IN .. % =I m L � { E)o(o l000 1500 5500 �LL-01s EXIST. REBAR & CAP L. S. 15710, FOUND *I 91 RfBAR & CAP LS 15710 FOUND (14' W77VESS Caft PROXCT BENaIMAA ELEV. - 1000.00 SAL VA 77CW DITCH ftL.M. ALUM. >--CAP FOUND EXIST. REBAR & CAP L. S. 15710, FOUND *I 91 n 0 FAX/MEMO [�] TO: Kathi Morgan Fax Phone: s I REMARKS: Kathi, ❑ Urgent E Date: 5/10/01 KC--NN�� INumber of pages including cover sheet: S l FROM: Nancy MacKenzie Phone: 970-920-5076 Fax Phone: 970-920-5077 E-mail: ❑ For your review ❑ Reply ASAP ® Please Comment Thunder Construction has sent us a check for the $536 owed for the extra hours our department spent on their septic system permit. However, they want us to sign this lienwaiver which I have never been asked to sign before by anyone. I don't feel our department is a subcontractor. What do you think? I have been holding their check or can I just go ahead and get it deposited? Thanks, U4 .t/�`— t. ASPEN/PIPKIN ENVIItIINMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMT ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS Owner's Name KENNER Parcel ID # Contact BILL POSS House Size (sq. ft.) >6000 (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) Number of Bedrooms in Main House Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow 1640 State Review Required? no Perc Rate 41 (T) Design Flow (Q) = # potential bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 2870 V/ Absorption Area (A= Q/5 X SQRT) A = 3675 sq. ft. of absorption area required ✓ 237 infiltrator units without reduction A maximum 30% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system, only if the tot size and soli conditions are optimal. If a reduction is being proposed, describe why lot size and soil conditions are optimal: IT IS A LARGE LOT WITH GOOD SOIL CONDITIONS. BEYOND THESE FACTORS, A DOSING SIPHON WILL BE INSTALLED TO DOSE A SERIES OF NARROW BEDS A = 2573 sq.ft. with reduction t/ 166 infiltrator units with reduction Type of system: OAbsorption trenches 0Absorption bed [X] Gravelless chambers ODry well OSeepage Pit 00ther DRIP IRRIGATION Minimum tank capacity 3588 gallons ✓ SETBACK FROM WELL / # of feet = 250 �/ SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet = 200 V SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = 175 V FINAL INSPECTION BY: DATE: .t 13 0 Engineer's Submittal for Septic Permit in Pitkin County Owners Last Name: KENNER Location: LOT 1, ASPEN VALLEY DOWNS Summary of information regarding new septic system: Type of system being proposed: SEPTIC TANK AND GRAVELLESS CHAMBERS Other treatment processes being used: NONE Does the system use any mechanical parts? (Prohibited unless there is no alternative)YFS If yes, explain why there are no alternatives A DOSING SIPHON IS REQUIRED TO EVENLY DISTRIBUTE EFFLUENT Does the system require any maintenance other than routine pumping? YES If yes, who will do the maintenance? CLEAN FILTER WHEN SEPTIC TANK IS PUMPED Are any reductions being proposed? YES If yes, what makes the lot and soil conditions optimal? IT IS A LARGE LOT WITH GOOD SOIL CONDITIONS. BEYOND THESE FACTORS, A DOSING SIPHON WILL BE INSTALLED TO DOSE A SERIES OF NARROW BEDS Which of the following are on the site or within setbacks? Closest distance of septic system to each feature 100 year floodplain N/A well(s) >249 FEET irrigation ditches >L Q streams N/A Q ponds N/A 0 other features N/A What was the profile hole depth? 10' What is the depth to groundwater? N A What is the depth to bedroW 7 AND 6.5' What assumptions, if any, were made in system sizing and design? (Include any local, site- specific data, such as months without snow cover, ratio of evaporation to absorption, etc. that are relevant.) NONE If there are any variations from normal design, please explain how they can be demonstrated to improve treatment and protect water quality. NONE 0 • THUNDER CONSTRUCTION, INC. P.O. Box 4841 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Telephone (970)923-4117 Fax(970)923-0223 LIENWAIVER OF SUBCONTRACTOR FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE RECEIPT AND SUFFICIENCY OF WHICH ARE HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, of Pitkin County Environmental Health (Subcontractor), hereby states as follows: 1. Subcontractor is currently owed the sum of $536.00, paid by Thunder Construction, Inc., Check #10070 for work done on the Kenner residence. The payment of this sum shall constitute payment in full for all work done under my contract with the contractor and/or Owner, and for any work provided to the Kenner residence, located at 0433 Running Mare Rd., Woody Creek, Colorado, through the date filled in below. 2. I hereby waive, in consideration of the payment referenced above, and all other sums paid to the undersigned Subcontractor prior to the date of this Lienwaiver, all right to claim a mechanic's lien for labor, services, machinery, tools, equipment, supplies, and materials furnished prior to the date of this Lienwaiver (to the owners or general contractor) for the construction of and related improvements to the Kenner Residence. 3. All of the persons employed by or related to this Subcontractor who have any rights to a mechanic's lien for labor, services, machinery, tools, equipment, supplies or materials furnished for the Kenner residence prior to the date of this Lienwaiver have been paid in full. DATED: 3/28/01 1y SUBCONTRACTOR: IM 00 0• Pitkin unty _ Ent<i onmenl[d Health March 28, 2001 Mr. Jeffrey Kenner C/o Mr. Monty Thompson Thunder Construction P.O. Box 4841 Aspen, CO 81612 RE: Invoice Dear Mr. Kenner; Enclosed please find an invoice for extra time taken by The Pitkin County Environmental Health Department staff to review your Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS). A total of 15.75 hours was spent on your system, 6 of those hours were covered by your initial permit fee of $330.00. The remaining 9.75 hours are billable to you at $55.00 per hour. In order to receive Final Approval of your ISDS we must receive payment for the invoiced amount. Please remit payment within 30 days. Thank you, Maddy Blumenthal Cc: Mr. Jeffrey Kenner file G hsds/kenner.doc c 00 0• PITKIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10 Aspen, Co. 81611 970-920-5070 BILL TO: Mr. Jeffrey Kenner c/o Mr. Monty Thompson Thunder Construction P.O. Box 4841 Aspen, CO 81612 INVOICE DATE: 03/28/2001 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PRICE AMOUNT 9.75 Additional hours on ISDS application for Running Mare Rd. $ 55.00 $ 536.25 ITOT–AIC—$ 536.25 .CHOURCH & Associates,Tnic. - ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS December 9, 1999 BILL POSS & Associates Attn: Brian Brookman 605 East Main Aspen, Colorado 8 161 1 Subject: Revised OWS Design, Proposed Kenner Residence Lot 1, Aspen Valley Downs Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 10777 Dear Mr. Brookman, As requested, we are providing this revised OWS design for the subject site. The revision is based on a reorientation of the beds from our April 23, 1999 design letter. This letter should be used in conjunction with our original design. This letter includes two revised figures, Figures 1 and 2. The original Figures 1 and 2 should be removed to avoid confusion. RECOMMENDATIONS - The OWS proposed includes: four septic tanks, three effluent filters, a dosing siphon, and 12 chamber -beds as presented on Revised Figure 1. The OWS design is based on an average sewage loading of 2870 GPD and a percolation rate of 41 MPI. We recommend installation of two 1000 - gallon single -compartment precast concrete septic tanks, one 2000 -gallon single -compartment precast concrete tank, and one 1500 -gallon two-compartment precast concrete septic tank with a dosing siphon in the second compartment. We recommend the installation of twelve chamber -beds, each with 2 rows of 7 chambers. A dosing siphon is required for distribution and to distribute the effluent through the field to increase the efficiency of the field. We recommend a 250 -gallon close per cycle. The proposed OWS is not oversized for section rotation and rotation should not be done. The surface of the drain fields should be seeded. We recommend using a native seed mix. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed over the fields. No landscaping or plastic can be installed over the fields, which will reduce perfor- mance of the fields. LIMITATIONS - An OWS design requires installation by a contractor who is experienced in its installa- tion. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted. If subsurface conditions considerably different from those described in this report are encountered, we should be notified to evaluate the effect on the proposed OWS. If the health department makes modifications to this design, we should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the performance of the OWS. All construction is to be in accordance with the ISDS regulations. Pipe type and size, burial requirements, septic tank constriction, and other specifications, which are not depicted in our report, are to conform to DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 . • Revised OWS Design Job No. 10777 Page 2 the requirements of the ISDS regulations. The installer of the system is to have demonstrated knowledge of the APEHD ISDS regulations and requirements. If there are any questions or if we can be of further service, please call. Sincerely, CHURCH & EOC/trp 2 copies sent copy to APEHD, Attn: Nancy Mackenzie copy to Aspen Earthmoving, LLC., Attn: Ty Duer, 818 Industry Place, Carbondale, CO 81623 fax invoice only to 970.920.2950, Atm: Kate M,nk )2 260 S OF NF/ TRA IE 1 R GRA LL S D w \ IN�IL T S HA ER 12 BED - 43. 5' - 4 JOB NO. 10777 UN CD � vo �c /N A E 9> � o 1 ` S17EPLAN, LOCAT/ON OFPERCO T/ON HOLES, AND LOCA VON OFPROPOS DOWS 19SO TYPICAL PLAN VIEW - N.T.S. EFFLUENT LINES TO ADDITIONAL BEDS -� 3 GRAVELLESCHAMBER DISTRIBUTION BOX 3' BY 6.25'. 4" SDR 35 PVC OBSERVATION/VENT PIPE TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION - N.T.S. 2.5' MAX 4" SDR 35 PVC BSERVATION/VENT PIPE WITH CAP kw - T OF STRUCTURE - 8 BEDROOMS, >6000 SF LOADING -4 BEDS - 130 GAL/DAY/PERSON -2 BEDS - 75 GAL/DAY/PERSON -POOL - 150 GAL/DAY/PERSON -GARGAGE - 150 GAL/DAY/PERSON TOTAL LOADING - 2870 GPD PERCOLATION TEST - 41 MPI AREA - (Q X SORT T)5 AREA - 3675 SF REDUCTION FOR USE OF CHAM3ERS - 30% TOTAL AREA - 2573 SF N MIN.- 4VATI 0 Y 4" SDR 35 PERFORATED PVC PIPE HUNG ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS (PIPE INSTALLED LEVEL) FOUR TOTAL BEDS GRAVELLESS CHAM 3' By E 4" SDR 35 PERFORATED PVC PIPE HUNG ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS SCOPE FOR DRA"MGE BED SPECIFICATIONS NUMBER OF BEDS - 12 LENGTH OF EACH BED - 43.75' 14 CHAMBERS WIDTH OF EACH BED - 6 FEET, 2 CHAMBERS TOTAL NUMBER OF CHAMBERS - 168 CHAMBERS TOTAL AREA - 2604 SF DRAIN FIELD DETAILS 6' MIN LEVEL MANIFOLD -F-EFFLUENT INLET (1/8" PER FOOT DROP) EFFLUENT LINES TO ADDITIONAL BEDS 4" SDR 35 SOLID PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 UNDER DRIVE; 1/8" PER F00T DROP) TYPICAL DISTRIBUTION BOX - N.T.S. z r PLAN VIEW [--INLET -3' APPROX. 4" SDR 35 PVC PIPE INLET OUTLET VIEW VIEW CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION BOX OR EQUIVALENT -CUTLET • MINIMUM OF SEVEN OUTLETS NEEDED TREATMENT UNIT SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CAPACITY - 1.75 X Q X (30 HOURS/24 HOURS) = 3588 GALLONS RECOMMENDATION - TWO 1000 GALLON AND ONE 2000 GALLON SINGLE COMPARTMENT PRE -CAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS AND ONE 1500 GALLON TWO COMPARTMENT PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK WITH A DOSING SIPHON IN SECOND COMPARTMENT FOR A TOTAL CAPACITY 0= 5500 GALLONS FIGURE 21 1.5' A PROX. 1' APPROX. INLET OUTLET VIEW VIEW CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION BOX OR EQUIVALENT -CUTLET • MINIMUM OF SEVEN OUTLETS NEEDED TREATMENT UNIT SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CAPACITY - 1.75 X Q X (30 HOURS/24 HOURS) = 3588 GALLONS RECOMMENDATION - TWO 1000 GALLON AND ONE 2000 GALLON SINGLE COMPARTMENT PRE -CAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS AND ONE 1500 GALLON TWO COMPARTMENT PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK WITH A DOSING SIPHON IN SECOND COMPARTMENT FOR A TOTAL CAPACITY 0= 5500 GALLONS FIGURE 21 w • CHURCH & Nv- as April 23, 1999 BILL POSS & Associates Attention: Brian Brookman 605 East Main Aspen, Colorado 81611 ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Subject: OWS Design, ProposeiWANsWResidence Lot 1, Aspen Valley Downs Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 10777 Dear Mr. Brookman, 40 • Inc. As requested, we have evaluated subsurface conditions at the site and designed an onsite wastewater system (OWS) for the proposed residence. Our firm investigated subsurface conditions on April 13, 1999. SITE CONDITIONS - The lot is located in a rural residential area in Pitkin County, Colorado. The proposed drain field area has a gentle slope of I M There is a moderate cover of native grasses in the proposed field area PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - A four-bedroom residence greater than 6000 square feet (SF), a two- bedroom caretaker unit/guest house, and pool house, and a garage with a washroom are proposed at the locations presented on Figure 1. We are sizing the OWS based on 8 bedrooms and 1640 Gallons Per Day (GPD) using Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department (APEHD) loading of 130 and 75 gallons per day per person The loading was determined based on individual detached structures. Thk�p e, which has g=W than 6000 SF is proposed to have 4 bedrooms and therefore has a design loading of 130 GPD/person. The estho less than 2000 SF and is proposed as 2 bedrooms ng was based on 75 GPD/perso . was breed on 15 people at 10 GPD/person and 1 -ho was based on 15 people at 10 GPD/person, for a total loading of 300 GPD for the garage and poo Ouse. The sewage loading with a peaking factor of 1.75 is 2870 GPD. This loading includes a dishwasher, gar- bage grinder, and washing machine. The residence will be served by public water. A pool is proposed at the southeast comer of the residence, which should be located 25+ feet from the drain field- SUBSURFACE eld SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS — We performed a subsurface investigation by drilling 8 percolation holes, 37 to 30 inches deep, and two profile holes at the locations indicated on Figure 1. Subsurface conditions in Profile 1 consisted of 1 foot of topsoil underlain by silty, sandy, clay to 7 feet, underlain by sandstone bedrock to the maximum depth explored of 10 $et Subsurface conditions in Profile 2 consisted of 1 foot of topsoil underlain by silty, sandy, clay to 6.5 feet, underlain by sandstone bedrock to the maximum depth explored of 10 feet. Percolation tests indicate percolation rates of 30 to 60 minutes per inch (MPI). The average percolation rate is 4t MPI. DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 90033 I303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 • O Design No Job No. 10777 Page 2 RECOMMENDATIONS - We recommend the installation of four septic tanks, a dosing siphon, and 6 chamber -bed OWS be installed at the locations presented on Figure 1. The OWS design is based on an average sewage load of 2870 GPD and a percolation rate of 41 MPI. We recommend the installation of two 1000 -gallon and one 2000 -gallon single -compartment concrete septic tanks at the individual structures to be followed by one 1500 -gallon two-compartment precast concrete septic with a dosing siphon in a screened vault in the second compartment, as indicated on Figure 1. The proposed OWS is not oversized for section rotation and rotation should not be done. We recommend the installation of six chamber -beds, each with 2 rows of 14 chambers. A dosing siphon is required to distribute the effluent through the field to increase the efficiency of the field. We recommend a distribution box with flow equalizers be installed to distribute effluent among the beds. We recommend a 250 -gallon dose per cycle. Dosing siphon details are presented as Figure 4. We recommend the surface of the field be seeded after installation of the fields. We recommend using a native seed mix available at seed stores. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed over the fields. No landscaping or plastic can be installed over the fields, which will reduce performance of the fields. Livestock should not be confined above the fields. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE - The owner must realize an OWS is different from public sewer service, and must assume the responsibility for maintenance of the OWS. The system is relatively maintenance free, but the owner must have the septic tanks pumped. We recommend the septic tank be pumped and the screened vault be cleaned or "hosed off' every two years. There are daily considerations, such as not putting plastic or other nonbiodegradable material into the OWS. Water use must be monitored so toilets are not allowed to run when seals malfunction. To illustrate the point, a run- ning toilet can consume in excess of 1000 GPD. A loading of 1000 GPD could flood and irreparably harm the OWS. We caution against installation of a water softener. The hydraulic loading from the backwash of a water softener may be detrimental to OWS. A separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash waste, if a softener is installed Chemically treated water from a swimming pool or spas should not be intro- duced to the OWS. LIMITATIONS - An OWS design requires installation by a contractor who is experienced in its installation. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted. If subsurface conditions considerably different from those described in this report are encountered, we should be notified to evaluate the effect on the proposed OWS. If the health department makes mod- ifications to this design, we should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the performance of the OWS. All construction is to be in accordance with the ISDS regulations. Pipe type and size, burial requirements, septic tank construction, and other specifications, which are not depicted in our report, are to conform to the requirements of the ISDS regulations. The installer of the system is to have demonstrated knowledge of the APEHD ISDS regulations and requirements. If there are any questions or if we can be of further service, please call. Sincerely, 7 • CHURCH & Associates Inc. Edward O. Church, P.E. EOC/trp 3 copies sent a3 • • O Design No Job No. 10777 Page 3 46 • If there are any questions or if we can be of further service, please call. Sincerely, CHURCH & As VpQ Pp�D O Edward O. Church, EOC/trp 3 copies sent Q� OWS Design • Job No. 10777 Page 3 2" Dia. Dosing Siphon System 1500 GALLONS Inspection Access Riser and Lid (at or near ground surface), optional Tank Ad( (cast or Inlet Uouid Level o Patent d 4,439,323 ® 1997, Orenco Systems, Inc. FIGURE 3 Slope Ground Away From Riser Cord Grip— To Dose Counter Drawdown Fiberglass Gosketed Lid with Stainless Steel Bolts PVC Riser with Grommet (bond to tank adapter with recommended adhesive) 1' Vent Piping Tank Adopter (cost or boned) —Discharge Fittings -- Effluent Discharge (3' dia. transport line required) —Vault Inlet Ports —Polyethylene Screen —Droin Part — Screened Siphon Vault —2, nexible Hose Assembly with Quick Disconnect • tri 0 Creno systems® 814 AIRWAY AVENUE SUTHMN, OREGON 97479-9012 Tf1ET HONE., (541) 459-4449 FAMMIIE (541) 459-2884 JOB NO. 10777 Rev. 1.0 (2/98) i • • Percolation Test Result Form Hole Hole Length of Water Depth Water Depth Drop in Water Percolation Rate No. Depth Interval at Start of at End of Level (min.) (min./in.) (in) (min) Interval (min) Interval (min.) 29.75 1.50 30 20 30 29.75 30.75 1 32 30 24.00 25.50 1.50 20 30 25.50 26.75 1.25 24 30 26.75 27.25 0.50 60 30 27.25 28.25 1.00 30 2 34 30 26.75 28.25 1.50 12 20 30 28.25 29.75 1.50 30 20 30 29.75 30.75 1.00 25.50 30 30 30.75 31.75 1.00 30 3 31 30 20.00 22.50 2.50 12 30 22.50 24.25 1.75 17 30 24.25 25.50 1.25 24 30 25.50 26.50 1.00 30 4 40 30 34.75 36.00 1.25 24 30 36.00 36.50 0.50 60 30 36.50 38.00 1.50 20 30 27.50 29.00 1.50 20 JOB NO. 1 FIGURE 4 6 35 30 23.00 25.75 2.75 11 30 25.75 27.50 1.75 Percolation Test Result Form 27.50 28.75 Hole Hole Length of Water Depth Water Depth Drop in Water Percolation Rate 0.75 No. Depth Interval at Start of at End of Level (min.) (min./in.) in. min. Interval min. Interval min. 5 31 30 18.00 20.75 2.75 11 30 20.75 22.25 1.50 20 30 22.25 23.50 1.25 24 30 23.50 24.25 0.75 40 6 35 30 23.00 25.75 2.75 11 30 25.75 27.50 1.75 17 30 27.50 28.75 1.25 24 30 28.75 29.50 0.75 40 7 37 30 25.00 27.75 2.75 11 30 27.75 29.75 2.00 15 30 29.75 30.75 1.00 30 30 30.75 32.00 1.25 24 8 33 30 21.00 23.75 2.75 11 30 23.75 25.00 1.25 24 30 25.00 25.75 0.75 40 30 25.75 26.50 0.75 40 JOB N0, 10777 FIGURE 5 w• PROFILE HOLE INFORMATION 1 40* PROFILE -1 PROFILE -2 TOPSOIL, SANDY, TOPSOIL, SANDY, RED/BROWN, ROOT ZONE IN RED/BROWN, ROOT ZONE INDICATES DEPTH TO FREE WATER AND THE NUMBER OF DAYS AFTER DRILLING THE MEASUREMENT WAS TAKEN INDICATES DEPTH TO CAVE AND THE NUMBER OF DAYS AFTER DRILLING THE MEASUREMENT WAS TAKEN INDICATES DEPTH TO PRACTICAL AUGER REFUSAL 33/12 INDICATES THAT 33 BLOWS OF A 140 POUND HAMMER FALLING 30 CCC"' INCHES WERE REQUIRED TO DRIVE A 2.5 INCH O.D. SAMPLER 12 INCHES I JOB NO. 10777 FIGURE 6 1 CLAY, SILTY, SANDY, CLAY, SILTY, SANDY, 3 SPARSE GRAVEL, VERY SPARSE, GRAVEL, VERY STIFF, MOIST, RED STIFF, MOIST, RED 4 33/12 30/12 5 6 7 SANDSTONE BEDROCK, B SANDSTONE BEDROCK, WEATHERED, HARD TO WEATHERED, HARD TO VERY HARD, MOIST, RED VERY HARD, MOIST, REO 9 50/12 43/12 IO INDICATES DEPTH TO FREE WATER AND THE NUMBER OF DAYS AFTER DRILLING THE MEASUREMENT WAS TAKEN INDICATES DEPTH TO CAVE AND THE NUMBER OF DAYS AFTER DRILLING THE MEASUREMENT WAS TAKEN INDICATES DEPTH TO PRACTICAL AUGER REFUSAL 33/12 INDICATES THAT 33 BLOWS OF A 140 POUND HAMMER FALLING 30 CCC"' INCHES WERE REQUIRED TO DRIVE A 2.5 INCH O.D. SAMPLER 12 INCHES I JOB NO. 10777 FIGURE 6 1 I. E16" L%fty Eaea"Mt to be relocated �ropoeed Relocation of Eaeernmt. r A 4o y:. r L • � ,..- .,. Thio �IM��iin� i5 1'YIP.�`T'C �/ �' FAX TO: Tim Petz c% Church & Assoc. Phone Fax Phone 303-463-9321 I CC: IREMARKS: ❑ Urgent ❑ For your review Tim, Date 5/19/99 INumber of pages including cover sheet FROM: Nancy MacKenzie Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Dept 130 Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Phone 970-920-5076 Fax Phone 970-920-5074 ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please Comment I have issued the septic permits for Kenner and Stone/Baltimore Jim though I feel I need adjustments made to your designs. But, I didn't want to hold up their permits Please remove from all your design letters your boiler plate language on the second page which addresses if additional bedrooms are planned. It gives the impression that the owner can simply increase the septic at their discretion, which is not the case. We always must insure that the proper setbacks are always maintained. And in Kenner you state in this same paragraph that the system is sized for an 8 -Br residence and this is not quite true. An 8 bedroom residence at 130 gallons/person/day would be larger than what is designed since the design is for a 4 BR and outbuilding with less flow. For the Stone septic, please remove that language also AND please revise you drawing so that it shows equal distribution to the 3 trenches. The design you submitted shows 50% going to the middle trench and 25% going to the two outer trenches. Nancy Tom Dunlop, 04:06 PM 03/2000 -0700, Aenner Residence Page 1 of 1 i X -Sender: tomd@comdev.ci.aspen.co.us X -Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 16:06:14 -0700 To: Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> From: Tom Dunlop <tomd@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: kenner Residence K Nancy, I spoke to Ty from Aspen Earthmoving today. He said there is an abandoned irrigation ditch close to the area he is putting the leach field. The homeowner also wants to install a pond close to the leach field area. Evidently the application and design (Tim Petz) says there will be 2870 gpd discharge. I told Ty he had to keep the leach field 194 feet from the pond, but could encroach on the abandoned ditch. He said he was going to bulldoze the ditch closed. I told him we would insist on that if the field was next to it without benefit of lining the ditch in case it were ever to be used in the future. He said he can'tut the field in where it is supposed to go if the ditch is operational and the pond is installed. He can't make the setbacks. I couldn't find the permit, but would hope Tim designed the field with proper setbacks. I get the impression he did not do that however. Ty said Tim was going to visit the site Thurs 3/30 morning and wanted you to be there too if you can make it. This is one that you should probably try to see. Ty said he would have a couple of trenches done by then. See me with questions. Thanks, TSD Thomas S. Dunlop, Director Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Dept. 130 S. Galena St. f " Aspen, CO CO 81611 `^,,,� � ,�lyy� tomd@ci.aspen.co.us 11*4 1� / 97n ate„ — 3) Printed for Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> 03/29/2000 A2.q® 0 0 0 0 bit OV5 Jill - v' v 0 .J 9Qf AIN 13S Baa sw nm oa A r -.ti r 9-90-M pB,6N GMlOR01T IYI-M Irmo! fumM OIOY'II.! TKIM (AWT1'. GO. 1/'C[ lNlL Fl.aaa /LA11 FIs rr..e sm AIM m _w.~ IR �Y ppb Yws DE916N DEVELOPMENT Im N came ODwnpl FLO LCJG P{GOR RINI fMp MY�M .m` A2.20 0 0 0 0 0 r m I r v m � msm na. a mm r-nr 390-99 oE916N OEYEI.OWENT ro slAm Qq/�� N1�%�EptriRq;�{_ R _sY .IOI . �1�f V m� 3-3a-gn DPF¢Ni DS-SF9q PIEObRE55 Kamm RAWK ASPEN VALLEY Doft g MMM FIV .NdER MXQ�S 0[ggIVIpN UPPER LEVEL PART B FLOOR PLAN e w'.,e SMEEa yT •/�1� 4p/1y A2. 11 on V) GMP CULVERT In • -- --- — Extend existing culvert a5 needed. 10% -12% GRAVEL DRIVE WITH s NATURAL EDGES �s Verner CoLmr� 1� N84'47'00'W 790.00' CtVIP CULVERT /7. H.P. 1020 40 Scale: 1" = 20' Contour Interval = 2' M 160 The Kenner Residence Site flan Enlargement ❑ Schematic Design 0 Design Development ❑ construction Documents Date: 6ri 6.1999 Scale: T'=29-0" Drawn By: N.9. Revised: 60114.1999 _ -- J Sheet: L-1.1 IIAO Q U fi q � W O Q , (n O �9 o /zI Q � V zw 5 W v 75 The Kenner Residence Site flan Enlargement ❑ Schematic Design 0 Design Development ❑ construction Documents Date: 6ri 6.1999 Scale: T'=29-0" Drawn By: N.9. Revised: 60114.1999 _ -- J Sheet: L-1.1 IIAO 1m f' t` v FV fl1 c+ �+ C m s 1m