Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
pitkin.planning.264316103001 (2016)
DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF TELE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER • Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat(s) DECISIONS RECEPTION#: 630988, 07/29/2016 at 12:58:05 PM, 1 OF 8, R $0.00 Doc Code ADMIN DECISION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF PITKIN COUNTY,COLORADO,APPROVING THE HURST FAMILY LP ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative Decision No. 2016 RECITALS 1) Hurst Family LP(hereafter"Applicant")has applied to the Community Development Director of Pitkin County(hereafter"Director")to establish an Activity Envelope and obtain Site Plan review approval to replace the existing residence. The existing residence is less than 100'from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River,and,therefore,is non-conforming as to the required setback. 2) The property is located at 104 River Rock Lane, and is more specifically described in Exhibit A. 3) The parcel contains 0.81 acres and is a non-conforming size parcel in the AR-10 zone district. The parcel is accessed from Upper River Road via River Rock Lane. 4) The parcel was created prior to June 12, 1978,and,therefore, is exempt from Growth Management for up to 5,750 square feet of floor area, pursuant to Sec. 6-30-100(a). The County issued a building permit for the existing residence in 1964. The residence was remodeled in 1985. 5) The Board of County Commissioners approved the Godfrey-Landis Subdivision Exemption for a Lot Line Adjustment,pursuant to Resolution No. 87-92;the Boundary Line Adjustment Plat is recorded in Plat Book 21 at Page 98. 6) The Director fords that the request complies with the applicable provisions of the Code,as follows: A) The existing residence is a legal, nonconforming structure, since it is located within the 100' setback from the Roaring Fork River as required by Sec. 7-20-80 of the Code. The residence will be replaced within the footprint of the existing structure;the closest point from the residence to the high water line is approximately 11'. The replacement structure complies with Section 9-50- 20(c)of the Code,which permits replacement of a legal,nonconforming structure,provided there is no increase in non-conformity. With the exception of a small area where there is an existing deck, where a replacement deck or patio is permitted,other development, including the proposed hot tub, fire pit and the majority of the patio(flagstone pavers in sand)are not permitted as they would increase the non-conformity within the setback. B) The existing and the proposed residence are outside of the limits of the effective 100 year floodplain,based on the 1986 FEMA maps. The proposed residence is within the limits of the proposed 2015 FEMA 100 year floodplain;these maps have not been adopted,but will be effective upon adoption. The proposed activity envelope extends into the effective 100 year floodplain;the envelope shall be revised to avoid the floodplain. The finished floor elevation of the proposed residence will be at least 1' above elevation 7,296.2',which is the 100 year flood elevation in the proposed maps,as determined by SGM Inc. in the Engineering Report dated 4/4/16. C) The existing driveway is approximately 10' wide with grades of up to 15%, and encroaches slightly on the parcel to the east. The driveway will be shifted to be on the lot and will be widened to develop a 12' driving surface. The Aspen Fire Marshal and the Planning Engineer support a modification to the width and grade standards in the County's Road Management and Administrative Decision No. -201 Page 2 Maintenance Plan,given the steep slopes on both sides of the driveway,the short length of the driveway,and the ability to provide an adequate turnaround at the bottom of the driveway,and that the proposed improvements will increase the safety of the existing driveway. One to two foot retaining walls will be installed on both sides of the driveway to stabilize the slopes and improve safety on the downhill side of the driveway. In addition,the northeast side wall of the garage will be developed with a structural retaining wall,and fill will be placed between the garage retaining wall and the driveway. The driveway improvements will affect slopes in excess of 30%. The Code permits minor improvements to the existing driveway,pursuant to Sec. 70-20- 20(c)(3).The improvements are limited in scope and are the minimum necessary to accomplish the widening requested by the Fire Marshal. D) The wildfire hazard is rated as low,and can be mitigated pursuant to the provisions of Sec.7-20- 60(c)of the Code. E) The parcel is not within mapped mule deer or elk habitat areas. Replacement of the residence will have minimal additional impacts on wildlife. F) The parcel is within the mapped Scenic View Protection Area; however,the residence is not visible from Highway 82 or Upper River Road. G) Domestic water is provided by an existing on-site well. H) The existing On-Site Wastewater Treatment System(OWTS)will be replaced in the same location as the existing OWTS. There is no alternative location for the OWTS on the parcel. Environmental Health has reviewed the preliminary OWTS design from SGM that indicates a system can be installed on the lot for a 3-bedroom house in the same location as the existing system. The existing and proposed OWTS are within the 100' setback from the river. The OWTS design incorporates a higher level treatment system since a system cannot be installed outside of the 100 foot setback from the river. The proposed OWTS complies with the minimum 50' setback to the river, as allowed by the County's OWTS regulations when a higher level treatment system is installed and operating. The proposed soil treatment area encroaches on the required setbacks to the house and property line,which is permitted by the OWTS regulations (6.28.040.A.3)for a replacement system when the previous system encroached on the same setback and there is no option to comply with the setback. In addition, a 30 mil liner will be placed vertically between the soil treatment area and the house to protect the foundation. The proposed soil treatment area does not encroach on the 100'setback from the well. APPROVED by the Director,subject to the following conditions,which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: 1. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the application and shall consider those representations to be conditions of approval,unless amended by other conditions. 2. Prior to submission of any future building permit applications,the Applicant shall be required to submit for approval by the County Attorney and Community Development a Site Plan with an Activity Envelope in accordance with Land Use Code Section 2-30-20(g)and Application Manual Section 2.1.12.The above referenced approvals shall be a condition precedent to finalization and recordation of them. The Activity Envelope and Site Plan shall be amended as follows,prior to recordation: A. Revise the western boundary of the Activity Envelope to coincide with the effective 100 year floodplain line. B. Remove the hot tub, fire pit and the majority of the patio(flagstone pavers in sand). A replacement deck or patio is permitted within the footprint of the existing deck. C. Include the 50' and 100' setbacks from the high water line of the river. Administrative Decision No2015 Page 3 3. The residence may be replaced with a residence of up to 5,750 square feet of floor area within the footprint of the existing residence and with a maximum of three(3)bedrooms. 4. With the building permit applications for the residence,the Applicant shall: A. Provide proof of an adequate water supply(in terms of quantity and availability)for domestic and fire protection purposes,and for irrigation purposes, if applicable. B. Submit a drainage and erosion control plan for review and approval by the Planning Engineer. All historic and natural drainage patterns shall be maintained. C. Submit a construction management plan for review and approval by the Planning Engineer. D. Complete a fireplace/woodstove registration form with the Community Development Department, if necessary. E. Submit a tree mitigation plan and a landscape plan. F. Submit a detailed revegetation plan for disturbed areas with appropriate seed mixes. G. Submit a lighting plan. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits for the new structures,the Applicant shall: A. Pay the applicable road and employee housing impact fees. B. Obtain an on-site wastewater treatment system(OWTS)construction permit for the replacement OWTS. C. Obtain a County access/driveway permit to improve the driveway. With the permit application, the Applicant shall submit a report from an engineer or geologist licensed in the State of Colorado demonstrating that the ground surface of the slopes in excess of 30%along the driveway are not prone to instability or failure,and that the proposed improvements will not cause greater instability or increase the potential for failure. D. Obtain a Floodplain Permit for all work within the floodplain. The permit application shall include a floodplain elevation certificate for the existing condition stamped by a civil/professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado. An engineer shall certify that any proposed flood-proofing methods are adequate to withstand the flood depths,pressures,velocities,impact and uplift forces and other factors associated with the base flood. The finished floor elevation of the proposed residence shall be at least I' above elevation 7,296.2'. 6. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the residence,the Applicant shall submit: A. A floodplain elevation certificate for the as-built condition,stamped by a civil/professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado. B. A flood-proofing certificate. 7. Areas disturbed by construction shall be re-vegetated within one growing season of the project's completion. 8. No development in excess of 30"above or below natural grade shall occur within the setbacks of the parcel,with the exception of driveways and associated retaining walls of up to 6' above or below natural grade and fencing. Landscaping in the form of berms within the setbacks shall not exceed four feet from the most restrictive grade. Any development located within setbacks mandated by County zoning regulations that does not comply with these restrictions shall require a variance from the Board of Adjustment. Approval of an activity envelope within such setbacks does not assure approval of a variance. Administrative Decision No5572015 Page 4 9. The Applicant shall comply with the following standards for Development in a Low Wildfire Hazard Area: A. Defensible Space:The area around all buildings/structures, limited by property boundaries that may limit a property owner's ability to comply with this section,shall incorporate landscaping with wildfire defensible space considerations as follows(note: actual vegetation manipulation to meet these conditions may not be necessary where the natural vegetation patterns have already fulfilled these conditions): 1) Brush,debris,and non-ornamental vegetation shall be removed within a minimum 10 foot perimeter around the structures. 2) Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the vertical and horizontal continuity of the fuels a minimum of a 30 foot perimeter around the structures. 3) Spacing between clumps of brush and vegetation within the 30 foot perimeters shall be a minimum of two times the height of the fuel. Maximum diameter of the clumps shall not exceed 10 feet. All measurements shall be from the edges of the crowns of the fuel. 4) All branches from trees and brush within the 30 foot perimeter shall be pruned to a height of 10 feet above the ground and ladder fuels from around trees and brush shall be removed. 5) Tree crown separation within the 30 foot perimeters shall have a minimum of 10 feet between the edges of the crowns. 6) All branches which extend over the roof eaves shall be trimmed and all branches within 15 feet of the chimneys shall be removed. 7) The density of fuels within a 100 foot perimeter of the structure shall be reduced. 8) All deadfall within the 100 foot perimeter shall be removed. 9) Low vegetation shall be maintained within a 10 foot perimeter around all structures. 10) The Applicant shall be responsible for the continued maintenance of the defensible space vegetation requirements. B. Roofing Materials: Class A covering or Class A assembly as defined by the currently adopted Building Code. No wood shakes or shingles. All other adopted Building Code compliant methods and materials permitted. Roofs with less than a 3:12 pitch are not permitted unless they comply with the following: 1) All roof coverings shall be constructed of non-combustible materials and installed on a Class A roof assembly. 2) All roof coverings shall have a surface that shall facilitate the natural process of clearing roof debris. 3) Protrusions above the roofline, such as parapets, shall be prohibited, unless specifically approved by the Fire Marshal. 4) Roofs shall be installed as required by the adopted Building Code and shall have a minimum pitch of 1:48. 5) All roof designs,coverings,or equivalent assemblies shall be specifically approved by the Fire Marshal prior to submittal of a building permit application. Administrative Decision No. 5-2015 Page 5 C. Maintenance and Miscellaneous Requirements 1) Roofs and gutters shall be kept clear of debris. 2) Roof vents shall be screened with corrosive resistant wire mesh,with mesh one-fourth(1/4) inch maximum. 3) Any outbuilding shall adhere to the same wildfire requirements. 4) Yards shall be kept clear of all litter, slash and flammable debris. 5) All flammable materials shall be stored on a parallel contour a minimum of fifteen(15)feet away from any structure. 6) Weeds and grasses within the ten(10)foot perimeter shall be maintained to a height not more than six(6) inches. 7) Firewood/wood piles shall be stacked on a parallel contour a minimum of fifteen(15)feet away from the structure. 8) Ponds shall be accessible by the local fire district. 9) Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris. 10) Wood fences shall not connect to other structures. 11) Fuel tanks shall be installed underground with an approved container. 12) Propane tanks shall be buried, if possible,or installed according to NFPA 58 standards and on a contour away from the structure with standard defensible space vegetation mitigation around any aboveground tank.Any wood enclosure around the tank shall be constructed with materials approved for two(2)hour fire-resistive construction on the exterior side of the walls. 13) Each structure shall have a minimum of one ten(10)pound ABC fire extinguisher. 14) Addresses shall be clearly marked with two(2)inch non-combustible letters and shall be visible at the primary point of access from the public or common access road and installed on a non-combustible post. 15) Utilities shall be extended underground. 10. The Applicant shall comply with the applicable codes and requirements of the Aspen Fire Protection District,including but not limited to access,turning around of fire apparatus,and water supply. Sprinklering of the residence is required. 11. The Applicant shall comply with the following conditions regarding wildlife: A. Manipulation of vegetation outside of the activity envelope is prohibited, except as necessary to comply with the wildfire hazard mitigation measures. B. Fruit bearing trees and shrubs are prohibited. C. Trash/garbage shall be kept in an approved bear resistant container or enclosure as required by the County's Wildlife Protection Ordinance. D. Construction workers shall be prohibited from bringing dogs on-site. E. All outside doors shall utilize only solid round handled door knobs unless another type is required by the applicable building code for disabled accessibility purposes. F. Bird feeders,including hummingbird feeders,shall be hung away from any deck or window,and shall be at least 10' from the ground suspended between 2 trees or posts. All seed feeders shall include a seed catchment pan to catch discarded seeds. Bird feeders should be removed from April through November. G. Composting shall be restricted to yard waste. H. Fencing shall comply with the following,except for fencing immediately adjacent to the buildings to contain pets: Administrative Decision No. -2015 Page Page 6 I) Wood fencing shall employ three rails or less,be the round or split rail type, shall not exceed 48 inches in height above ground level and 12 inches in width(top view),and shall have at least 18 inches between two of the rails. 2) Wire fencing shall consist of no more than 3 strands of smooth wire and shall not exceed 42 inches in height. 3) Mesh or woven wire fences are prohibited, except when used for protection around isolated trees or clumps of trees. 12. No development shall occur outside of the approved activity envelope,with the exception of vegetation removal necessary to comply with the wildfire mitigation measures described above. 13. Prior to commencement of any earthmoving or other construction activity,the Applicant shall stake the corners of the activity envelope and install construction fencing around the construction site within the perimeter of the envelope.The fencing shall remain in place until issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 14. No calculations for height,bulk,setback,size,floor area,or any other building and zoning requirements have been conducted. These requirements will be considered at the time of building permit. Any structures represented in the application may not be permitted under building and zoning regulations. 15. Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this approval, or any subsequent permit(s)or approval(s)related to this property, or vested rights associated with this property. 16. Statutory vested rights for the approval contained herein are granted pursuant to the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Colorado Statutes,subject to the exceptions set forth in Pitkin County Land Use C de, § 2-20-170 and C.R.S., § 24-68-105. The statutory vested rights granted herein shall expire on -th 2019. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES WEEKLY on the 28th day of April,2016. APPROVED by the Director,this 2L day of J ,2016. PUBLISHED AFTER ADQIRTION FOR VES ED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS in the Aspen Times Weekly on the/ day of 4 ,2016. 7 -t1 �e Cin Houben, Community Development Director PID#264316103001 P030-16 Land Title Document Delivery Page 3 of 6 A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND LOT 12, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16 BEING 1511 FEET S 00°28'00" W FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE S 00° 28'00" W 190 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE WEST 140 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY EDGE OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ROARING FORK RIVER TO AN IRON POST FOUND IN PLACE ON THE BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER (CHORD BEARS S 48°11'10" E 193.52 FEET); THENCE S 49°35' E 71.80 FEET; THENCE N 34° 49'20"E 63.93 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP; THENCE N 05° 58109"W 23.78 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP; THENCE N 23° 08'07"W 41.95 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP; THENCE N 08° 42'00"E 46.19 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP; THENCE N 36° 44'44"W 76. 92 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP; THENCE N 76° 23'33"E 23.29 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP; THENCE N 83° 43'50"E 10.82 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP; THENCE S 48° 41'14"E 27.08 FEET; THENCE N 08° 42'00"E 96.73 FEET; THENCE N 60° 25'00"W 119.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, TOGETHER WITH: A DRIVEWAY EASEMENT SITUATE IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING 20 FEET IN WIDTH AND LYING 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AN EXISTING COUNTY ROAD ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND KNOWN AS LOT R, LITTLE TEXAS SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, WHENCE THE NW CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 8 OF SAID SECTION 16 BEARS N 15°19'42" W 1982.59 FEET; THENCE FROM A TANGENT BEARING N 81°45'56" W, A DISTANCE OF 17.30 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 25.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°38'35" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 61° 56'38" W 16.95 FEET; THENCE N 42°07'21" W 63.61 FEET; THENCE 59.94 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 585.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5°52'13" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 45°03'27" W 59.91 FEET; THENCE N 47°59'34" W 22.78 FEET; THENCE 50.29 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 570.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5°03'17" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 50°31'12" W 50.27 FEET; THENCE N 53°02'51" W 9.95 FEET; THENCE 60.04 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 480.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°09'58" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 56°37'50" W 60.00 FEET; THENCE N 60°12'49" W 61.07 FEET; THENCE 40.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 215.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE https://www.ltgc.corn/email?ici-uivOxLQQfBzfEu3-n8XVWg 4/1/2016 Land Title Document Delivery Page 4 of 6 LEFT, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°40'42" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 65°33'10" W 40.01 FEET; THENCE N 70°53'31" W 26.13 FEET; THENCE 59.91 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 1325.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2°35'27" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 69°35'48" W 59.91 FEET; THENCE N 68°18'04" W 10.15 FEET; THENCE 39.80 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 215.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°36'28" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 73°36'18" W 39.75 FEET; THENCE N 78°54'32" W 10.67 FEET; THENCE S 83°43'50" W 37.75 FEET; THENCE S 76°23'33" W 27.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF ENDING. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO APPLICATION MATERIAL MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENTS • PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the general public that on July 20, 2016,the Pitkin County Community Development Director granted approval for the Hurst Family LP Activity Envelope and Site Plan Review(Case P030-16;Deter. #055-2016). The property is located at 104 River Rock Lane and is legally described as a Tract of land situated in the SW V4 of the NE 1/4 and Lot 12, Section 16, Township 9 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M. The State Parcel Identification Number for the property is 2643-161-03-001. This site-specific development plan grants a vested property right pursuant to Title 24,Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes. S/Cindy Houben Community Development Director Pitkin County, Colorado Published in the Aspen Times Weekly, on AUGUST 4, 2016. Io--' 1 .- County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE & } ss. MAILING PURSUANT TO State of Colorado } PITKIN COUNTY LAND USE CODE SECTION 2-20-100 I, C Le n '� H 0 r---1 , being or representing an Applicant to the Pitkin County Development Department, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 2-20-100 of the Pitkin County Land Use Regulations in the following manner: >- '-Z--1 IR, 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by firs class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail at least 2 weeks prior to the public comment deadline to all own s of property within 300' of the subject property, as indicated on th attached list, on 201 (which is 30 days prior to the deadline of , 201,. The names and addresses of the adjacent property owners shall be those on the current records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than 60 days prior to the public comment. _ to S_--s,_l 2. By posting a sign in a cons.icuous •lace on the subject property(as it could be seen from the nearest public way) on the , 201 which is at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public comment deadline. A photo_,.ph of the posted sign is a ed hereto. H/-1-7 \--k-,...r b,- �,_._ 1,A.L`P Applicant's name Signature (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this I 1 day of 146,1 , 201bby (deinn I-k 'n WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: Mown wAr 3 i W11 V-41rnbex krone D lei CA,, Nota Public Notary Public's Signature G:lcounty\admin\fonnslaffidavit for Activity Envelope/Site Plan/Caretaker Dwelling Unit KIMBERLY ANNE DIETRICH ` I Notary Public t State of Colorado Notary ID 20151043003 14 M Commbaioa Nov 1 2019 1 ri-ti-J 11/2-7/1 (2 poI/o/j /l� PUBLIC NOTICE RE: Hurst Family LP Activity Envelope and Site Plan Review (Case P030-16) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an application has been submitted by Hurst Family LP (100 North Hope Avenue, #2, Santa Barbara, CA 93110) requesting approval to establish an Activity Envelope and obtain Site Plan Review approval to replace the single family residence. The property is located at 104 River Rock Lane and is legally described as a Tract of land situated in the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 and Lot 12, Section 16, Township 9 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M. The State Parcel Identification Number for the property is 2643-161-03-001. The application is available for public inspection in the Pitkin County Community Development Department, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611. Comments or objections are due by May 30, 2016. For further information, contact Suzanne Wolff at (970) 920-5093. Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on April 28,2016. Attention All Property Owners within 300' of the subject property A property owner receiving this public notice who wishes to submit comments or an objection shall submit those to the Pitkin County Community Development, 130 South Galena Street,Aspen, Colorado 81611, by May 30, 2016. If any objections to the development application are received the Community Development Department shall continue the application to a public hearing before the Hearing Officer. http://pitkincounty.com/DocumentCenterNiew/8787 Easy Neer' Laoeis i — beau awny mu:w , \..,811 � /yV G1t i‘2Y7 IOW" I Use Avery®Template 5160'' j feed Paper "° '-1 expose Pop-up EdgeTM j j RIVERHOUSE LLC WICHITA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 50% WALLDORF ROBERT C 1100 TOBLER RD 8 WHITE ROCK TR 710 JOHNNIE DODDS BLVD STE110 KNOXVILLE,TN 37919 ALLEN,TX 75002 MT PLEASANT,SC 29464 KEMPNER JAMES CARROLL II GOLDSTONE CARROLL KEMPNER SPARLIN TRUST 3701 OVERBROOK 146 PARK DR PO BOX 2363 HOUSTON,TX 77027 SAN ANTONIO,TX 78212 ASPEN,CO 81612 PATRICK KEVEN L MELBERG THOMAS A TRUST MELBERG MARILYN S TRUST PO BOX 608 PO BOX 630 PO BOX 630 WOODY CREEK,CO 81656 WOODY CREEK,CO 81656 WOODY CREEK.CO 81656 WINSTON GORDON R WOLKOFF STEPHANIE WINSTON BATINKOFF RANDALL M 516 CROSS RIVER RD 791 PARK AVE#2A 516 CROSS RIVER RD KATONAH,NY 10536 NEW YORK,NY 10021 KATONAH,NY 10536 RUTGERS ANTHONY L&DIANE STURM ANGELICA DINSMOOR WILLIAM P J&JANE K A 256 TWINING FLATS RD 24540 ELM RD PO BOX 121 ASPEN,CO 81611 LAKE FOREST, IL 60045 WOODY CREEK,CO 81656 MACINTYRE LAWRENCE R MCALLISTER DONALD R&SANDRA K KINNEY DANIEL J PO BOX 10701 PO BOX 475 PO BOX 133 ASPEN,CO 81612 WOODY CREEK,CO 81656 WOODY CREEK,CO 81656 DOYLE MARY NAGLE SHANNON SMK WOODY CREEK LP PO BOX 133 PO BOX 3283 2228 DEL MONTE DR WOODY CREEK,CO 81656 ASPEN,CO 81612 HOUSTON,TX 77019 WARD CAROL R REVOCABLE TRUST RAYBURN ANITA RUDD 81.38% TUDGE CHRISTOPHER 18.62% 35 OLD POWERHOUSE RD 460 WOODS RD 460 WOODS RD FALMOUTH,ME 04105 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 PEW ROBERT C III PO BOX 219 WOODY CREEK,CO 81656-0219 Etiquettes faciles a peler i Replier la hachure afro de www.avery.com . . .. _..___ ti,__� Sens de 1.._. .. ,.� i 4.onn_Afl_A.,CDV . , AA.' -4, V.,.. ....," 4.40,V;;; . : • !.( ;,.,',.:71,0,,..--.N---7 , _ - ... , .. ., • I ", *" • •:4.,... 1•A?.` • - • - k. ..- -,:.,-.,;1 •3;t4—' $ -- -- _ . . 1 •P.c.i.c,,,. .., ,,,....!: .... --'4V"..' . . ,_, ,‘. !, _.,,,,,NI,!..7.: ,-....ei 4 ... •,•4..7-;..,%14, A', ,i....O.•-;,;‘,„1 'r• .. : •''' A ,'n.,s ,,,,- - -1, ' ,,,L ,,,ZRA7..`,,,,,‘.., . . . _ '‘-1(' ' & t'f - .4.iIA.*.4A'''‘''tit7iS 7f1. . -• ... - ,.., ''''' . • • . . ......00■1116..............'.."10.1110 ,rye.171..---. C • a .. , ,• i .... ... , o ts , • ,.. ; • ' . t - .-, ‘) , •\.,' • i o . r ... I... , . , a 0 ;...=-,..,........-- , ,- - - ---- ...., t..,,,,, .•i - .•;'.'. .'---°' 7,,,.- ......,,r*., ... -..'*•-• . '1- .' .. • r ...,1,3,14A-,_ ,,,,p ,,,,, z-,,,, iv- - ....vic5.,:-.... -, t- • .-1..* -I, .:..-e %J., b., ti t ', .. • '-' ., E ' I. 4.1t'''' * %.`°.-1,?‘ 1 ,,,C.iik, ( 1`4.-1 ''.4-f'- ..V;,, ---:1..$7*-,.4:' :,ii.r,,„ -`„1 .: 04,ii .. if : 4_.;;1,?!*-.„_:' .,' , •`",S ,;"\i':krivk•- 1,,-7-,, et,, ,-'';,-,.1._"?...z,..,,:.::;,if-i„,:.-7:7::114:: ,7 -.4._,..4'-‘.: ...4. ' fl„;,•: 10 -r•-..""f:i - • ..."."".4%.—-77. - , +4 r*L. ' '•' .'" 2'. ' --- '* :', ` .,,- ' A • .'"?-t ' - ..7""---"•:, 4 r ''-- •• ,-14X,Aif`.1'.1..,,'-'4:,'; *\k '11).. ''-'7::',.r• fir"--"V • ' ' - .•'r'1.9i' , ;31t, .< . t.,,,.......„,,,i.,.. .4,t,-,. ,- •.' ',,,,,,.. .'.1:,,......t -.•,3 _ •,. ..4--•..1 !c ., .c. •00 . , .t. /17,,I , ,.. i.•,. _ . , • 4i U. • . . + z s ,,,.. . :.*-,.., !-...i ,, .--‘.,.• . ,,,t,, t> r , -- . 7.: Z 2 1 0 r 8 VP ''2iii E.•4,11., ::„5...., (.., : t k, .., 0 4 -4,•: 2 1.-- - -- •— ' N't LLI E 0 - E u 5 - 4? — • ".":., °-4 7--„,--,.,,,„„ „.„ › Z 11'• Ij *.0 , Zi- 14 - $ - . > . ,i -+ 0 7.t. Pi'6 LI . 4 •., .. 0 I 1 i j. CO) .. Cr. -i, 2 1 n I I- ° ' 0 6 9 1— 1— :-- .1 0 • _ • - i. -- — ___._.,....-- 1 . }••• Z VI ° CO ,- 04 , , ME 1,.. < Z t fo 0 :.; C? ...s !^,.._. '1'..1 ,j ••••• VAO.: - .• .... '''' '.. CO Cif), ; ••••1 ...la t 2 !:Z 2 .4 . 1- ,,, _ • — - , iii u- 1— C 1`.', '''' a 4 ,•‘"=-.•— - • , -, - , ' —..,.. .-.:.,.._,-.•,•_... — , — MK c• 4- a § 701 = '§' Cn,- i. M Z ; 4:) , ' '7 ,.. 1 t. ‘-'-‘ .....- ' 1 . Om4.„ .0 1 I - '-;: .- •-•'' - .,,, ,... t .0 c, .,- Jo ca u., c.) =..t- — c.i. ti, of LI 6 ca.(.) .- co .- -, ._—--• - . _.• - . . . - _ • -- : y. ' - :•.• , s. N . , ,-, , ,,. 4.. .... , -'...?- .-- . z.- '? - k ' s','- ' • .., .. . ...--c .. .. .. • , .. ..... ...... - egt' cP -,.. • f, \ ''.- -1, ,' -i •s\ ' .. . '' .. , . (.,.,‘ ii, I ' ..1 • 1 f 4 ..._, . . f \,- i _ ,. . . T- , 0 O > 73 �re, C -C CD 2 - - u,� 5 0 CO o $ po cow « E (......... - A - 9 3 m = 2 ■ F.'CO \ ° r- Z n m \ e > m H \ j 2 H / / / • $ CO / m 2 N / / q & \ m o / \ GO Cl) 4- t'..) n % ® Q \ 2 * :Ca 0 \ z e -1 A , _= . , e...---- ¥ e arm . f FA 2ti m % 9 &rn� . - 2 �7 - 0 �.0 > a Is-_i . i ar-4 ¥ • ¥ omo s » P :_-- ' ism \ \\\\ �-N o P 2 m 2 ! i } } ' __w ■>o Z € Z _ ) ! ▪ « »oma 1' If - / 2 7) m 713 1 - : 01m » ' 1 =p.% in , _ N Q . 0 } •• T // // - I / eRVEfj \ # m . 1-1 IS T \\ \ \\ -= ige°4 '...""b- Afilikillallai n 0 CO 10 0 •Cn - .� 0 1:13 O ili � n 7 (t 0 00 fl) ...< ` rn- ; 7, 3 - ca 3 CD 3 Z S rn 1 O Z r- -,- J 1, T 0 C7 71 :17 ➢ T `:1 Z n N r... _ N 'D {FJ U Z J - m s �., co 4'a p C) {• Z 4 CO oi Y 1. o, `i R" G f'" ..F" of 4 tgi Z of m "Q_ . fl 1-4 - N -niC m •s 01 rn - tki Er' 0 r ti --I r.—I ni _- y Ij I (4)- 1 r vi VI ® L ' )0 -:-.—trl tr$ ''!t•_-/;‘::.:-4 ) i.‘i\ ( '.f , (thin Coy N Tit Suzanne Wolff<suzanne.wolff@pitkincounty.com> Hurst - 104 River Rock Lane Nancy MacKenzie <nancy_bill_mackenzie@yahoo.com> Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:42 PM Reply-To: Nancy MacKenzie <nancy_bill_mackenzie@yahoo.com> To: Suzanne Wolff <suzanne.wolff@pitkincounty.com> Woody Creek Caucus District Planning Commission Post Office Box 297 Woody Creek, Colorado, 81656 Suzanne Wolff Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 5/23/2016 TO: Suzanne Wolff RE: Hurst Family LP Activity Envelope & Site Plan Review for 104 River Rock Lane Parcel ID #264-161-03-001 The Woody Creek Caucus Planning Commission is very concerned with this proposal. The location, age and sizing of the OWST (septic system) for this project are our major concerns. What we don't know is if they have a legal right to keep the septic where it is. `Grandfathering'of any part of the existing OWTS could compromise the water quality of the ground water and comprise water quality of the Roaring Fork River. The existing OWST is much less that 10011 from the Roaring River and much less than 100 feet from the well for this property and it should not be grandfathered in. No copies of OWTS permits were included in the application. Based on the possible age of the components for the original house (1954?) and the undocumented sizing of the system, no part of this system should be `grandfathered' in. This is a brand new house, potentially larger house, and with probably more water-use fixtures and appliances from that in the original 1954 house. A new system with new components that meets current OWTS regulations for setbacks and sizing should be designed for this new house. Respectfully submitted, Woody Creek District Planning Commission By, Nancy Mackenzie i �-:C' 1 f-r i tv COU w r Suzanne Wolff<suzanne.wolff@pitkincounty.com> Fwd: Preliminary OWTS design for Hurst Residence (104 River Rock Lane, Woody Creek) Kurt Dahl <kurt.dahl@pitkincounty.com> Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:41 PM To: Suzanne Wolff <suzanne.wolff@pitkincounty.com> Cc: Will Comerer<WiIIC@sgm-inc.com> Suzanne, I have an OWTS design from SGM that indicates a system can be installed on the lot for a 3-bedroom house. The design incorporates a higher level treatment system since they cannot install a system over 100 feet from the Roaring Fork River. It does make the minimum 50' setback to the River as allowed by Pitkin OWTS Regs when a higher level treatment system is installed and operating. The proposed soil treatment area does encroach on the setbacks to the house and property line. However, the OWTS Regs (6.28.040.A.3) allow for the replacement of a system to encroach on a setback when the previous system encroaced on the same setback and there is no option to comply with the setback (this is the case for the property line and for the house setbacks). Further, the engineer is placing a 30 mil liner vertically between the soil treatment area and the house to protect the foundation. The proposed soil treatment area does not encroach on the 100'well setback but under current regulations would be allowed a reduction in the setback to 75' based on the higher level treatment system treating effluent to a TL 3N standard. The reduction in the well setback does not create much additional space for the soil treatment area because the majority of this area would violate the 50' minimum setback to the River. I am ok with moving forward with the land use approvals. The applicant has only supplied the OWTS design for land use review purposes and must still apply for an OWTS construction permit to install the proposed system. Kurt ---- Forwarded message -- From: Will Comerer<WilIC@sgm-inc.com> Date: Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:10 PM Subject: RE: Preliminary OWTS design for Hurst Residence (104 River Rock Lane, Woody Creek) To: Kurt Dahl <kurt.dahl@pitkincounty.com>, Suzanne Wolff <suzanne.wolff@pitkincounty.com> Cc: Matt Webster<MattW@sgm-inc.com> Good afternoon Kurt, The proposed STA will be located within 10' of the property line. I have revised the drawing to show the locations of the two setbacks we cannot meet,the property line and the residence. Please let me know if you have any other questions, or if I need to add anything else. Thanks, William Comerer, El Aspen/Pitkin Team 1c)-C (i) SL clwrslw7s-u,-t�awR.11w,-+,ws�l?-D.,\Gole...L# lwrs-yr-evs.,ruxr/11/20'S aw ru 81 OW comes 1 n -a r s.N R xQagiiii! .. i'll 1 Ttik 1 iR 111 . 1111 j$0i 1 I !R 111 i g i -G) F il ;! I o 11 - i 4 0 444, I 21711P— p V o lopr000k........ 1 O�aD�)1 . , • , . .././ ,..,, ..... / .„ . ..... \., v. • . ... • , / PIPIL.r.. me ♦ '/i / _'Ong ','' , R '\ • II {I, 3 •N• .../....V f.kWirritglif 'd •••#. AI 14,,,,,s, If •...O.' lOPIP ). 3-..,- %.,.._,, _. ,f.,.............. • „,..'.,.. 74/.., ,,,t; • 1 s .-- 41 -.•- • .- .• ti • ,44).-N., / J./ ie.,' 1, pipk ,'--44,-.14..: ;V gi �� li ,. a r.s.- ) °I 111 - ';:je-- (4; .. ; D 12T ,.. C ., 4496,..... .*. .. . .. 0 IR.--. - •Z./...•\--7.7-- ./- ..... . 1,..1 rn p I 6 .0Q F • I C /.- .o 1 \ i4---I _ vr u' �ceA.,...i_I -...: o . / w -• n ,_ .. - r11 0 ti�q t! \\. .11,....1.a. f s �. : •„.e va .... . .. .._____ , ,_...., m 1 . , t , „ .., ....... ,, .: . , ..., „ , . i f �R-' .., 1 1! Ii ;.•• N / . II 'P } . s e. '' -. . ioN f J ( J. tiV ap lH� o co $ n as t.° C\ 0 \ i . It F13 0 V Ill .__C �2 H ‘1),.._ 1111•,--,..- --,.::.i. .,...•..,.---...-.. �1 14'_ w? o =11,,,,.. ;,..,..,:,!,,...,•-...:,I , Qll=�� Z II f f. "1 ./II- wam I IjM= I -1111111 1'_ 1g8. 111 ` s 8 r "-I ...1., y 1=1 v 1=u=4=11 +j�I =11•-II'=1=11=1m � o o�,oZ O g , - =11=1-11=1.' sa Ny,v� z vArY N =11=! =11 `N / •••1) `/ \ ill ,c, gN N FINE g , tit a A o L Q oe I� o g N �$ O >E �0. . ' a 6 1a ■■llAl 0 o I ' i hi f ji uw Coy wril Suzanne Wolff<suzanne.wolff@pitkincounty.com> -- t5- •'a) -- Fwd: Preliminary OWTS design for Hurst Residence (104 River Rock Lane, Woody Creek) Kurt Dahl <kurt.dahl@pitkincounty.com> Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:54 PM To: Suzanne Wolff <suzanne.wolff@pitkincounty.com>, Bryan Daugherty <bryan.daugherty@pitkincounty.com> See discussion below. I asked them to amend the design and include a number of items that were left out on the original draft. However, they are asking if they can add a bedroom for a 4-bedroom residence. It appears that they can meet setbacks for a 4-bedroom system with the exception of the 100 foot to the river requirement and we are allowing them to go down to 50' due to there being no options and they are installing a higher level treatment system. My inclination is to not allow expansion since they cannot meet the 100 foot setback rule and only allow for a 3-bedroom system. Agree, thoughts? Is this something that we should throw at Ely in case we get pushback? Thanks, Kurt ----- Forwarded message ----- From: Matt Webster <MattW@sgm-inc.com> Date: Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1:22 PM Subject: RE: Preliminary OWTS design for Hurst Residence (104 River Rock Lane, Woody Creek) To: Kurt Dahl <kurt.dahl@pitkincounty.com>, Bryan Daugherty <bryan.daugherty@pitkincounty.com> Cc: Will Comerer<WiIIC@sgm-inc.com> Kurt, A 4-bedroom system (requiring 429 sq. ft.)will fit in the footprint shown (455 sq. ft.)with a Type 1 soil design. Sorry if the various options we've been discussing have confused things. So I think the main question is whether the increase in bedroom count from existing conditions would be permitting with the 50' river setback or if the addition bedroom is simply not permitting on this site. I think during our initial conversations, you were leaning toward no increase in use. So we just wanted to see that if we replace the system with an entirely new system that fits within the parameters/setbacks being discussed, is a 4th bedroom in play or not. Thanks, Matt Webster Chief Operating Officer Celebratin„ 118 W. 6th St., Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.384.9019 / 970.319.3006 cell Yea, www.sgm•inc.com 65GM 2015 Colorado Companies to Watch WINNER! Itri up From: Kurt Dahl [mailto:kurt.dahl@pitkincounty.corn] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 11:58 AM To: Matt Webster; Bryan Daugherty Cc: Will Comerer Subject: Re: Preliminary OWTS design for Hurst Residence (104 River Rock Lane, Woody Creek) It appears to me that you could not make the 100' setback to the well is the field size increases. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Matt Webster<MattW@sgm-inc.com> wrote: Kurt. Just want to clarify one point: does a completely new, replacement system bring a 4-bedroom house into play, or are we still limited to just replacing the 3-bedroom house with a 3-bedroom house? This, of course, assumes that we can meet a 50' river setback with secondary treatment, a 100' well setback, and are only looking to vary the property line and house setbacks... Thanks, Matt Webster Chief Operating Officer Celebratiri. 118 W. 6th St., Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.384.9019 / 970.319.3006 cell Years www.sgm-inc.com 65GM 2015 Colorado Companies to Watch WINNER! © ia From: Kurt Dahl [mailto:kurt.dahl@pitkincounty.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 10:28 AM To: Will Comerer Cc: suzanne.wolff@pitkincounty.com; Matt Webster; hyhurst@me.com; Glenn Horn; Jay Hammond; Bryan Daugherty Subject: Re: Preliminary OWTS design for Hurst Residence (104 River Rock Lane, Woody Creek) V Will, Can you incorporate the information from your email into the design to alleviate any confusion. I was reviewing the design and the items you discuss in your email are the exact ones I was looking for and did not see them until I re-read your email. Thanks, Kurt On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Will Comerer<WillC@sgm-inc.com> wrote: Good aftemoon Kurt, Attached is a PDF showing a very preliminary design that we completed as part of the pricing exercise for this project. We are submitting this drawing to you now in order to demonstrate that a new OWTS can be installed that will meet the setbacks to the well and river. The final design may differ slightly, but the components will be placed in approximately the locations shown. The drawing shows that a 455 square-foot soil treatment area (STA)can be installed while maintaining the 100 foot setback to the existing well that serves the house. The system shown has been sized based on a Type 2 soil. HP Geotech has since conducted soil testing at the site (report attached)that indicates that the soil has characteristics of a Type 1 soil. We anticipate basing the final design of the system on a Type 1 soil, which would result in a smaller STA (321 sq. ft. required). The system will be located beyond the 50-foot setback to the river, as permitted when "no reasonable alternative area exists". I believe we confirmed this to be the case after a site visit. The neighbor's well prevents us from installing the system on the hillside that we looked at on the northern portion of the property. We will be installing an Orenco Advantex secondary treatment system to meet the treatment level requirements (TL3N, CO acceptance letter attached). The STA shown does not meet the minimum 20-foot setback to the house, or the 10-foot setback to the property line. We plan to address this by using a liner to prevent lateral transmission of the effluent. We will be seeking relief from these two setback requirements. Please feel free to call or email me with any questions or concerns you may have. We are willing to provide additional drawings or specifications if needed. Thanks, William Comerer, El Aspen/Pitkin Team 5 € x 1� INN �l 7 � 4 € goa yr b ii m ,- , ,agy , ils � 3. g Rig"MI 1i xe il 1 Hi - i MI ,0 y2. fiji III I II ' 11' Cii 2. y � X3 °oSff �S d 2 i slq- sidi g, R.i f 1 I t i ph 19 a6li ay �P �6� of / A m f• i g I E _ € E�� x� a WI fU�a"cood � q ~'a � 2e p" �r:7 a Ifg — o •• e � eFi ��� 11 III iii CD it 1. g s�i�",- j� f/ 4+JONr g`� s a� c11 � Eaa Ig p �v cps yy 0 ai = 0 �o - A V EA Yrfj n / - .._. row% ,. .� - a 113 a .. - - O .� D ''- If o § '. °l, G R X CI I Hifi 0 !II t:4' // a A 6 111•5110..1, aa3 € €11 b b \Si , / \ 1 1. 1. 1 s p, a #1 / ' . i c FF C R 'SXk't • _ y� 0 R Z d v c 7 CO e a 3 .k- r- Ti Ti a A ao •o° °a'a oiIUII 0 < ° °° r m9 3 & s �� 4T 21 21 / 39 2 o m o i - mm / nD Gl v / M . / n - (//// ti ,4,4* A ; i - , - RD 4 N - - - ,� • Vf ` CD • m - /: I / / 1 1 / • /'p ' � 11/ 2& ' -_ l / / , 404 , I li i / /05> 1 , _b, ,, Ag, , 4,. ..... ,_ . , 1 // ,f,. .4, . , , .. , , k, I %// 5, © -,, i I i ,, / i r. .,�,�. / ,// //, / __ v l' , 1/ // -/ /" / / Z/1 / 3 a 4 neo �6-0,,,,011, , /- ' /}//// % / /� / /// / YV / ' // -��to ./././ i /, / Ar, �4r��%�' _ li iii 1 //�/�///i _ . "'�,. �i / /0/ / _ P 1 // / /1,/ / / / / / / / a 8 ./ -�' ifir 1 / 1// / / /// J//lai.. . / _ , , , -! i / /y/ i/ / /� / m /� ‘N 1,,/, ,/,/, //ii r 0 , ,, - p-C7 ____--///////////,‘ / // 7(// „o- . ' $ 7- c //r / // / ' ,, / to co D =v v n e f ` 7 / , / 0 ,` i) CD `T .9. n • l i a . i-- ° A 3 ° OG - ° Dg m W b-' m 0 O am = a n o 9 PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5526 FAX#(970) 920-5439 MEMORANDUM To: Suzanne Wolff FROM: Susan Pearson, Planning Engineer Re: Hurst Family LP Activity Envelope and Site Plan Review (PID 2643- 061-03-001; Case P030-16) DATE: May 9,2016 After reviewing the application I have the following comments: > All applicants shall obtain an approved Access Permit to construct a new Access or a change in access for any parcel of land. Each application shall include: • A current survey of the site (must be within one year of submission for building permit date) • An engineered Access plan with a slope analysis for the drive,with details (plan,profiles and sections) showing all dimensions and slopes—existing and proposed • Compliance with the current Asset Management Plan o 16 feet in width o Maximum grade of 12% o Approach grade of 2% for 30 feet to intersection o Minimum curve radius at centerline of drive is 50 feet o Pullouts 10' x 50' minimum every 500 feet Jig As per the Land Use review the engineers and the Fire Department has come to an agreement to vary the above requirements for the driveway because of the configuration of the property. With the Access Permit please submit a letter (email) from the Aspen Fire Department and SGM (engineering)that states the acceptable requirements and why. • Compliance with all requirements of the Aspen Fire Department • Details on all pull-outs,turn arounds and parking locations • Details and sections demonstrating the driveway slope, ditches and any culverts, and/or drainage improvements existing and proposed • Details and sections (engineered workup) of Firetruck turnarounds, entrances and curves • If required, fire hydrants shall be included in this permit application • Access plans should be stamped and signed by a Professional or Civil Engineer and include sections,take offs, profile view and slope analysis • No driveway grade change in excess of 6 feet is allowed in any setback > All applicants shall apply for and obtain an Earthmoving, Clearing and Grubbing Permit for any, earthwork, buried water tanks, utilities and landscaping. The permit application shall address and include: • A current survey of the site(must be within one year of submission for building permit date) • Top soil shall be stockpiled and maintained for re-—using appropriate erosion control techniques(BMPs in compliance with the State of Colorado Stormwater specifications are required for soils storage). https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/STORMWATER%20 MANAGEMENT%20PLAN%20PREPARATION%20GUIDANCE.pdf • All re-grading,berming and landscaping shall comply with County setback requirements and shall be completed only within an activity envelope • Water rights should be demonstrated • Please try to show a balanced cut and fill > A detailed restoration and/or landscaping plan will be required. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by Pitkin County Community Development. The plan shall speak directly to the revegetation of all disturbed areas. The revegetation plan shall be reviewed and approved by Pitkin County Community Development. The plan shall include: • Any removal of trees which are over 6"Diameter at Breast Height(DBH) shall be mitigated at 1 inch of replacement DBH for each DBH of tree removed. This mitigation shall take place on site. • No berry bearing species shall be included in the landscaping plan. • All plants used for landscaping and revegetation must be native plant species,this includes any riparian plant species. • The applicant shall also commit to a noxious weed management plan. • The applicant must reseed all disturbed areas prior to C of 0 • Any slopes in excess of 15%must use erosion control matting for revegetation • All trees shall be planted in something other than a straight line. Typically trees planted in clumps with multiple species will appear to have been grown naturally. • Any irrigation used for the watering of landscaping should be minimal. Please use light spray and or drip. This is for the stability of the steep slopes. > A detailed engineered (stamped and signed)Drainage and Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted with each development permit: • All historic and natural drainage patterns shall remain unchanged. • Minimal disturbance shall take place • Natural vegetation shall be preserved as much as practicable • Mitigation measures and BMPs shall remain in place until replacement vegetation is viable • Biodegradable erosion control matting shall be used for revegetation on slopes • Erosion sedimentation and stormwater must be addressed before, during, and after construction. > All applicants,with each development permit application shall submit a Large Scale detailed Construction Management Plan(CMP)that addresses all phases of construction. This shall include a site plan and written methodology addressing the requirements of a large scale CMP. The application shall include: • Fugitive dust control • A revegetation plan inclusive of all disturbance for the entire site • A tire washing device or a vehicle track pad should be used at the egress from the site to ensure that no sediment is tracked off site • Top soil shall be kept alive and stored on site using adequate BMPs • Stormwater management techniques appropriate to the site should be utilized—no sediment or runoff should leave the site https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/STORMWATER%20 MANAGEMENT%20PLAN%20PREPARATION%20GUIDANCE.pdf • Silt fencing, straw wattles and hay bales must be used during construction to control drainage from this site until disturbed areas are adequately revegetated • Acquire a State Stormwater Permit if the cumulative area of the entire project disturbs in excess of 1 acre > The applicant shall provide a detailed outdoor lighting plan, which should include all outdoor lighting cut sheets—this plan must comply with the requirements of PCLUC 7-20-140 and be inclusive of ALL outdoor lighting on this site. Lighting shall be installed at each egress per the National Electric Code (NEC) 210-70-b, but, remain minimal otherwise ➢ Retaining walls, if over 4 feet in height shall be engineered. Retaining walls should not be in excess of 7 feet. They should be shown on the Earthmoving Permit application • If retaining wall are tiered, there should be 5 feet in between the tiers • The applicant shall submit a floodplain permit for all work within the floodplain no matter how minor. It is the burden of the applicant to clearly demonstrate whether or not the development is within the 100 year floodplain. They shall do so by providing a stamped report and drawings. • The applicant shall clearly demonstrate the development within the 100 year floodplain by providing a stamped report and drawings, which shall include a FEMA floodplain map 3 • The application should include a: o Vicinity map o Copies of all applicable land use approvals o FEMA floodplain map with the development clearly overlaid upon the map panel o For all structures within the 100 year floodplain there shall be a completed and stamped elevation certificate provided prior to construction and upon completion of construction documenting as-built conditions o Where flood-proofing is utilized for a structure a registered professional engineer shall certify that the flood-proofing methods are adequate to withstand the flood depths, pressures, velocities, impact and uplift forces and other factors associated with the base flood. o Flood-proofing certification indicating flood-proofed elevations shall be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy o A revegetation plan with seed mix,rate of application and method of cover o All floodplain documentation shall be stamped and fully designed by a licensed Professional Engineer or Civil Engineer. A Aa/_ Duo Hurst Family LP Activity Envelope & Site Plan I I W 2643=161=03=001 P03a"t� Revegetation and Erosion Control Notes Overall Property 1. Road and driveway shall be revegetated as soon as possible following the disturbance to avoid \ unsightly scars and weed infestation on the landscape. Utility cuts shall be revegetated immediately after installation of utilities to prevent weed infestation. Landowner shall insure proper weed control in impacted areas. 2. Erosion control attention to disturbed areas shall be implemented to ensure there is no Landis Parcel detrimental impact or runoff to any ponds, streams or Wetlands. 3 5 547.4 sgft 3. In areas that are to be revegetated (especially seeding locations which have received heavy Acres \ \ \ \ \ \ construction equipment traffic soil shall be scarified before the Application of seed. Slope0.816 traffic), \ surfaces shall be roughened b tracked equipment u and down the face of the slope. � Y g eq P P P 4. Newly seeded areas shall be protected from wind and water erosion through the use of mulches. Acceptable mulches are wood chips, straw, hydro -mulch and erosion -control netting. 5. Erosion -control netting will be required on slopes 3:1 or steeper, if allowed by variance to \ \ Section 9-103-2, and in Drainage swales. Property Line Note: No fruit bearingtrees will be planted on site. Shrubs and trees will be native to P Activity Envelope area and site if possible. � � 01- \ Existing Gravel Drive Proposed 18" Walls �� \ e'0. \ \ Legal Description — Landis parcel pursuant to the Godfrey -Landis subdivision c.•..i Dd- \ �— exemption boundary line adjustment plat recording plat book 21 an page 98, Pitkin County Clerk & Recorders office. ` \ \\ f \ Xr/ lk ti \ \ .c �s So s° aqi `raga \Y1 \ \ Oq, O 6' \ 137' Gravel \ Drive Vicinity Man Pitkin County Da Pasture Mix a� No Scale Common Name -land Latin Name Percentase Slender Wheat Blymas 2)nchi=Arlm 33% Upper River Rd Western Wheatgrass Green Needlegrasa PascopyrseW'% lril 33% AasseAa 33%._ I {1►�ta. In tqi� W"�+' << � \�\ \ Godfrey Parcel Z To Be Used On Hillside Out Of River Setbacks (/o o lei-" / Roaring Fork River O Seeding rate to be 8-12 lbs/acre �\a \ °\ \ \ 24" (On Drive Side) Stone Wall For Safety Slope Stability Hwy 82 = Pitkin Countv Mountain Meadow Mix Vehicle an Woody Creek Rd \\ \ \ \ Garage Wall To Retain Grade For Slope Common x•,,.. Latin Name Percentage \ \ \ \ \\ I \ 13j0 �\� Landis Parcel ✓ \ �j, Stability ro Fowl Bluegrass •Stream Poapa/XW* 10% ° Desriia mss 30 /o \ \ \ \ \ 35,547.4 scift \ �� �� 24 Stone Wall For Slope Stability .SII@ ! @ Oty b aik Wh � Streambank Whea ass 1"Aw Arsaw E eras /ancralalas 30 /o \�\ \ 0.816 Acres ° Western Wheatgrasa Arctic/Baltic Rush Parcopyronsmi/hii 20% Aeneas wWcacas A042i'xr 10% o To Be Used Around Residence Outside Of Lawn Areas 10 ' Iver Rock Road w dinOR 36-40 lbs/acre PLS broadcast Seedingttb181b/PLS if di rate o e lbs/acre drift seeding if Proposed Aspen Tree ' \ Spruce Tree \ Single ily Residence \ � Property Line Seed Notes: Proposed ` r \ \\ ° Existing 10' Wide Driveway Be The site must be mulched with weed -free mulch after planting. Mulch should be applied Effective 100 Year Flood Plain - - -- '" \ � \r\ 1 \\ Widened To 12' Wide, 1,4'Clear ar i at the rate of 2 tons per acre. Hay with tackifies must be applied at the rate of 150 lbs. per acre to prevent wind from\\ blowing hay off the revegetated areas. Activity Envelope Proposed Grill In Wall To Replace Existing \ \ \ �� \\ \ \ Between Walls Activity Envelope Signature Block Plant Legend Stone and Timber Wall \ \6' \ \ \ ��� Proposed Autocourt � \ �� \ � High Water Line 100' Setback Base Floor Elevation Is 1' Above Disclaimer ProposedDeciduous Tree Proposed 100 Year Flood Elevation , Applicant acknowledges that he/she has been informed by Pitkin County of the existence of environmental hazard area that might affect the property, any (mprovementa, and the use and occupancy thereof, the Proposed Evergreen Tree Existing Deck To Be Replaced \ \ \ provisions of the Pitkin County regulations do not In any wayassure or imply that areas outside of designated the safety of - J hazard areas willbe free from hazards, or that pprov mitigation measures will guarantee � any Pro . % ProposedRiparian Shrubs \ \ 1 \ Owner App cant : Harrison Yale $ at Finally LP Pitkin County Comm pity Development Department Director IO by the Pltldn County ` \ This Site Plan / Activity Envelope Plan hasu reviewed 7d apprgyed Community Development Director this /� day of ,2 G l t0 , subject to Administrative Decision No Z•1 - recorded as reception noriusiV. /•� '/ \\\\ _ High Water Line 50' Setback n'� Vfemp �artment or o C Acceptance forrecordiog \ \ \\ \\ \ a \ \��\� / Activity Envelope This Site Plan / Activity Envelope Pian has been accepted for filing In the office of the Clerk a�n_4Itecorder of Pitkin, C lorado, l � � li m. This � day of_QL1L in plat O \ c' the co of state o at O'clock, -W I a • _ 9 m\ \ \ moo book p_ at page as reception number 1 N C 90 \ N\ Clerk and Recorder RECEPTION#: 633912,11116/2016 at 12:13:41 PM, 1 OF 1, R $11.00 Janice K.�L. * sj� •� G ' °e v0 °y°a dee •�L I 1 - �° \� \$, as �.l_. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, °•° of o� CO PLAT BK 116 PG 49 Cn'•......••�, � p N a 7 ,le7re,1` _. oa i° \ Hurst Ridence Activity Envelope and Site Plan GREG MOZIAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. October 27, 2016 Landscape Architecture • Environmental Planning 1 "=10�-0 ' 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Ph: (970) 925-8963 Fax: (970) 925-1217 Email: gma@rof.net 1. Road and driveway shall be revegetated as soon as possible following the disturbance to avoid unsightly scars and weed infestation on the landscape. Utility cuts shall be revegetated immediately after installation of utilities to prevent weed infestation. Landowner shall insure proper weed control in impacted areas. 2. Erosion control attention to disturbed areas shall be implemented to ensure there is no detrimental impact or runoff to any ponds, streams or Wetlands. 3. In areas that are to be revegetated (especially seeding locations which have received heavy construction equipment traffic), soil shall be scarified before the Application of seed. Slope surfaces shall be roughened by running tracked equipment up and down the face of the slope. 4. Newly seeded areas shall be protected from wind and water erosion through the use of mulches. Acceptable mulches are wood chips, straw, hydro -mulch and erosion -control netting. 5. Erosion -control netting will be required on slopes 3:1 or steeper, if allowed by variance to Section 9-103-2, and in Drainage swales. Note: No fruit bearing trees will be planted on site. Shrubs and trees will be native to area and site if possible. Landis parcel pursuant to the Godfrey -Landis subdivision exemption boundary line adjustment plat recording plat book 21 an page 98, Pitkin County Clerk & Recorders office. Applicant acknowledges that he/she has been informed by Pitkin County of the existence of environmental hazard areas that might affect the property, any improvements, and the use and occupancy thereof, the provisions of the Pitkin County regulations do not in any way assure or imply that areas outside of designated hazard areas win be free from hazards, or that approved mitigation measures will guarantee the safety of any RroPerky. Owner ! Appticant : Harrison ale Hurst ural am' y LP Pitkin County Community Development Department Director This Site Plan / Activity Envelope Plan has been reviewed and approved by the Pitkin County Community Development Director this day of ,2 _ , subject to Administrat; v Decision No. - recorded as reception no. Pitkin County Community Development Department Hearing Director Acceptance for recording This Site Plan / Activity Envelope Plan has been accepted for filing in the office of the Clerk and Recorder a: the county of Pitkin, state of Colorado, at o'clock, _ m. This day of in pia[ book at page as reception number Clerk and Recorder GREG MOZIAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Landscape Architecture • Environmental Planning 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pte: (970) 925-8963 Fax: (970) 425-1217 Email: gnna®rot.net Hurst Family LP Activity Envelope & Site Plan Overall Property Landis Parcel 35,547.4 sqft 0.816 Acres �9 \ 01,( \ Common Name Latin Name Upper River Rd Roaring Fork River p Hwy 82 s Woody Creek Rd Western Wheatgrass Site T° 4 Green Needlegrass t` 'ado 33% \ 20% 0 Jancas arclicas/6altiras ,y •O Seeding rate to be t 7 ``1 Seed Notes: Applicant acknowledges that he/she has been informed by Pitkin County of the existence of environmental hazard areas that might affect the property, any improvements, and the use and occupancy thereof, the provisions of the Pitkin County regulations do not in any way assure or imply that areas outside of designated hazard areas win be free from hazards, or that approved mitigation measures will guarantee the safety of any RroPerky. Owner ! Appticant : Harrison ale Hurst ural am' y LP Pitkin County Community Development Department Director This Site Plan / Activity Envelope Plan has been reviewed and approved by the Pitkin County Community Development Director this day of ,2 _ , subject to Administrat; v Decision No. - recorded as reception no. Pitkin County Community Development Department Hearing Director Acceptance for recording This Site Plan / Activity Envelope Plan has been accepted for filing in the office of the Clerk and Recorder a: the county of Pitkin, state of Colorado, at o'clock, _ m. This day of in pia[ book at page as reception number Clerk and Recorder GREG MOZIAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Landscape Architecture • Environmental Planning 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pte: (970) 925-8963 Fax: (970) 425-1217 Email: gnna®rot.net Hurst Family LP Activity Envelope & Site Plan Overall Property Landis Parcel 35,547.4 sqft 0.816 Acres �9 \ 01,( \ Common Name Latin Name Percentaee 0.1 Slender Wheat ElYMAS Trachyeaalas 33% Western Wheatgrass Pa emyram Smrrhri 33% Green Needlegrass .?Vusella I<ridala 33% Seeding rate to be 8-12 lbs/acre Common Name Latin Name Percentaee 0.1 Fowl Bluegrass Poapalr A'A 10% Tufted Hairgrass Oeschampsla evesplrosa 30% Streambank Wheatgrass Elymaslanceolwar 30% Western Wheatgrass Pascopyroasmilha 20% Arctic/Baltic Rush Jancas arclicas/6altiras 10% Seeding rate to be 18 lbs/acre PLS if drill seeding OR 3640 lbs/acre PLS if broadcast Seed Notes: The site must be mulched with weed -free mulch after planting. Mulch should be applied at the rate of 2 tons per acre. Hay with tackifier must be applied at the rate of 150 lbs. per acre to prevent wind from blowing hay off the revegetated areas. Plant end ProposedDeciduous Tree P1oposed Evergreen Tree Proposed Riparian Shlylbs Property Line Activity Envelc, Existing Gravel Drive Proposed 18" Walls 2643-161-03-001 0, 104 rB;�\ 9•a �! � c Y II/� �y� e Ori \ o e \ X Activity Envelope Proposed Aspen Tree Proposed Spruce Tree Proposed Hot Tub On Grade Proposed Flagstone Pavers Set In Sand — Proposed Grill In Wall To Replace Existing Stone and Timber Wall Base Floor Elevation Is 1' Above — Proposed 100 Year Flood Elevation Proposed Firepit On Grade P 104 River Rock Road Single Family Residence v /$ cy s. e, 0.1 R°r£ RO°r Gravel Drive +3odFrey Parcel 24" (On L ,ae) Stone Wall For Vehicle S` ty and Slope Stability Garage Wall To Retain Grade For Slope Stability —24" Stone Wall For Slope Stability r � "Ppo• /a v Property Line Existing 10' Wide Driveway To Be Widened To 12' Wide, 14' Clear Between Walls Activity Envelope �— Proposed Autocourt Oo o�• Proposed 100 Year Flood 0�'� �\ �\ \ / 19 Line As Per FEMA \ \ Activity Envelope 90 4'a V e. �//✓� q ort As \ V• � \ 0 4°e e \ /O \ Activi Envelope and Site Plan April 4, 2016 1 "=10'=011