The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.eh.264326201010 (1996) (Main House)ASP( N ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPAh IT APPLICA't v FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL 'M 130 S. Galena St., Aspen Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970.920.5039 Permit# I ,, P'Parcei ID# --4 lc I/ ) - .--2-. 6 ,.� — e) / -- (")/b Permit For: No* Installation (�/ Repair (,y` Remodel ( ) Emergency Use ( ) Name of OWNER Street Address Owner's Mailing Address Business Phone: Home Phone: Legal Description: lot F � ,Block ,Subdivision Size of lot: acres Type of proposed structure:T Size of bldg. envelope: Total area/living space (sq. ft):rJ� # of Bedrooms, offices and similar size rooms: L Caretaker Unit : Attached Detached Total areaniving space of caretaker units ft. ! # of Bedrooms, offices and similar size rooms Primary Contact Person Contact Mailing Address) tai Qw /V Business Phone : ' % . / f ; I Cell Phone: Fax : Water:( )Private well ( )Spring ( )Stream ( ) Community/Public (Name of System) Is Proof of Adequate Water attached ( Required) ? ( ) Yes ( ) No (A water quality test and well pump test or approval tetter from community system) Has this project been approvad by Pitkin County ? (;.) Yes( ) No j� y? Am��l z�v is a copy of the floor plan attached (Required)?( ) Yes 4 ) No �.7 0 Is a copy of the site plan attached (Required) ? , Yes ( ) No ''' r )ir /:? f I ii Application for an Individual selvage disposal system is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above Information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accurate Information on locations of all existing and proposed wells, contour Intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes, waterlines, springs, suction or irrigation lines, drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, floodplains, dry gulches, and existing septic systems. I acknowledge that any false or incomplete information will invalidate the application and any subsequent permit, issuance of the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may a u0ertaX6 untlj.all a provaI rid permits have been obtained. The owner assumes all responsibilities in case of failure or inadequacy of this system. ;� Signature of applicantYL//_ 41�f� �� t, l date f/ ----------------------------- -----------------------------------------------/I------------------ - For denaf(ment use below PERMIT FOR INDIVIDUAL. SWAGE DISROSAL SYSTE�tt Pere Rate ruin per inch . Septic tank capacity: Profile Hole Depth feet gallons Absorption area: l_ sq. Q. I. j.Vl- ..L'i yi1= _c/ d Y!'� .Q, %' t�4rr�.- 9:7, - % ie, Me-1 An Inspection is required prior to backfill of any component of the distribution system. Design by Engineer Required ?I Yes ( ) No All plans and specifications of the engineer must be followed_ Any changes must be approved by €ire Aspen/Pitkin Envirommntal Heah) epartment in writing and the engineer must certify the final installation to the Environmental Health Department in writing_ 7 L_I Permit approval by: 1'L-� d' ',!fP. i�' �: Date Pians and specifications of the proposed Individu ewage disposal systeni. ave baen reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work Indicated In accordance with the Pitidn County iSDS Regulation in effect at the time or Issue. This permit becomes Invalid a months from lite (tate that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in uniting by the Department. As -Built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Installer: / Receipt # , Site PlanI N 1 i Well Permit and Solis Test Date received 11 J-7-0 Floor Pian W rl Water Quality Test or r. . Date info Complete Received by 2) Comm Dev Approval r„ ii)i Water System Letter Final Insp Requested Final Inspection Approval:' 1 i Date:_ i j ' ,' .. i ' ' � � APEtiD 10196 ASPENP' N ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPAR'rF T APPLICA', .a FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL '°M 130 S. Galena St., Aspen Colorado 81611 Q !F Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970-920-5039 Permit # b F,s Parcel ID # _ 4, V3 — „.Z (y -) — & j — o / 6 Permit For: New Installation ((/ Repair (4" Remodel ( ) Emergency Use( ) Name of OWNER Street Address) Owner's Mailing Address��jfQ�( Business Phone: Home Phone: Primary Contact Person Contact Mailing Address X (V L Business Phone f2 9 1 Cell Phone: Fax: Water:( )Private well ( )Spring ( )Stream ( ) Community/Public (Name of System) Is Proof of Adequate Water Attached ( Required) ? ( )Yes( ) No (A water quality test and well pump test or approval letter from community system) Has this project been approved by Pitkin County ? (Ilryes ( ) No Is a copy of the floor plan attached (Required)?( ) Yes ONo I " `✓ `//i �-t/J, /�j��` ��f �� Is a copy of the site plan attached (Required) ? es ( ) NoG- Application for an individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accurate information on locations of all existing and proposed wells, contour intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes, waterlines, springs, suction or irrigation lines, drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, floodplains, dry gulches, and existing septic systems. I acknowledge that any false or incomplete information will invalidate the application and any subsequent permit. Issuanc f the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may �e urfderta&ti all provals 'd permits have been obtained. The owner assumes all res nsibilities in case of failure or inadequacy of this system C AV, Signature of applicant bate ---------------------------------------------- ---- -------------------- For department use below PERMIT FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Perc Rate min per inch Profile Hole Depth Septic tank capacity: gallons Absorption area: feet sq. ft. �,�- „i:�,., `�t�,�'� � � . a. CaCc�-C, � 9�,►.c_ , d�,�. 'Yl.ovt�..kn_ h1 / i � � �r.�-.� 1 s d s f?. yx r-aif �V 3 it An inspection is required prior to backfill of any component of the distribution system. Design by Engineer Required ? Y) Yes ( ) No All plans and specifications of the engineer must be followed. Any changes must be approved by the Aspen/Pitkin Envirommntal Health Department in writing and the engineer must certify the final installation to the Environmental Health Department in writing. Permit approval by: Date 1 Plans and specifications of the proposed individ ewage disposal syste ave been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -Built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Installer: 13 p� %}0 i Receipt # r q Site Plan Well Permit and it hq Soils Test 1. - 2-C Date received Floor Plan N A Water Quality Test or zq Date Info Complete (� Received by Comm Dev Approval iv A Water System Letter Final Insp Requested Final Inspection Approval: A-1) Date: APEHD 10196 r J ASPEN/' N ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPA17T114' 1' APPLICA', FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL 'M 130 S. Galena St., Aspen Colorado 81611 F Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970-920-5039 Permit# a Parcel ID # Permit For: Ne Installation (a Repair (, )o' Remodel () Emergency Use ( ) Name of OWNER Street Address�71G7� Owner's Mailing Address ,f�� X / 7 �L !i /�� -7 79/6 Business Phone: Home Phone: Primary Contact Person 1. f Contact Mailing Address JZ/0 L C' Business Phone : 1 _iPhone: Cell Fax: Water:( )Private well ( )Spring ( )Stream ( ) Community/Public (Name of System) ' Is Proof of Adequate Water Attached ( Required) ? ( ) Yes ( ) No (A water quality test and well pump test or approval letter from community system) Has this project been approved by Pitkin County ? (Vo'es ( ) NoJc Is a copy of the floor plan attached ( Required ) ? ( ) Yes (,f No r �� J� ✓/f� Is a copy of the site plan attached (Required) ? Jzy'�es ( ) No '�L� rY� "" I-- A — o in N 01 � • N t� BOD � m �— v (0 co C9 ao ami mw z w1 m -0 mm� N H N v za C N ti —Zj w O F1 iifffffff— Application for an individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accurate information on locations of all existing and proposed wells, contour intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes, waterlines, springs, suction or irrigation lines, drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, floodplains, dry gulches, and existing septic systems. I acknowledge that any false or incomplete information will invalidate the application and any subsequent permit. Issuan f the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to PAkin County codes. No construction may,ge undert ti all provals d permits have been obtained. The owner assumes all res nsibilities in case of failure or inadequacy of this system. Signature of applicant ) .bate ------------------------------------------------------ ---- -------------------- For department use below PERMIT FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Perc Rate min per inch Profile Hole Depth Septic tank capacity: gallons Absorption area: feet � s a s R�.�,.a )m,r,� � i� �� m-�+� �c ,rte►-� 9 4 An inspection is required prior to backfill of any component of the distribution system. sq. ft. Design by Engineer Required ?) Yes ( ) No All plans and specifications of the engineer must be followed. Any changes must be approved by the Aspen/Pitkin Envirommntal Healepartment in writing and the engineer must certify the final installation to the Environmental Health Department in writing. Permit approval by: — Date Plans and specifications of the proposed individ ewage disposal syste ave been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -Built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Installer: 7v 6 b CZ ff 6 r e, rrr ri n; n; 1 cF Receipt # /— Site Plan N ,� Well Permit and Soils Test i - SO— Date received 1i I Z� Floor Plan N A Water Quality Test or Li. Date Info Complete Received by Comm Dev Approval n; A Water System Letter Final Insp Requested Approval: Final Inspection AppDate: I �_ ?_7 APEHD 10196 ASPENIPIT' 1 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPAR-ME` -' APPLICATIO. ,,JR iNDiV!DUAL SEWAGE DISrOSAL S r: M C(DPY 130 S. Galena St., Aspen Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970-920-5039 Permit # b 1 / ? Parcel ID # -I- & y 'S -- & - , — y y — L= / t-' Permit For: Ndv Installation ( Repair (-' Remodel ( ) Emergency Use( ) Name of OWNERil�� /i � �,��r' Street Address Owner's Mailing Address��%� Business Phone: Home Phone: Primary Contact Person ��J 7) -,/toy r � Contact Mailing Address f--"14 (� /t -y Cell Phone: ! nl ~ Business Phone: � <! ! Fax Water:( )Private well ( )Spring ( )Stream ( ) Community/Public (Name of System) Is Proof of Adequate Water Attached ( Required) ? ( ) Yes ( ) No Has this project been approved by Pitkin County ? (116es ( ) No Is a copy of the floor plan attached (Required)?( ) Yes (,,JNo is a copy of the site plan attached No ( A water quality test and well pump test or approval letter from community system) C9 6- z 41h Ili maw C9 M- -0 3� w w Z3D A�� ONS � O~ Application for an individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accurate information on locations of all existing and proposed wells, contour intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes, waterlines, springs, suction or irrigation lines, drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, floodplains, dry gulches, and existing septic systems. I acknowledge that any false or incomplete information will invalidate the application and any subseq nt permit. Issuance f the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may l e urfdert ti all provals d permits have been obtained. The owner assumes allres nsibilities in case of failure or inadequacy of this system. i�1 1Signature of applicant _ / i 2 1 ' l6ate12 ----------------------------------------I------------------------------ For department use below PERMIT FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Perc Rate min per inch Profile Hole Depth Septic tank capacity: gallons Absorption area: feet sq. ft. An inspection is required prior to backfill of any component of the distribution system. Des,In by Engineer Required ?Yes ( ) No All plans and specifications of the engineer must be followed. Any changes must be approved by the AspenlPitkin Envirommntal Heal epartment in writing and the engineer must certify the final installation to the Environmental Health Department in writing" Permit approval by: Date ( eZ Z Plans and specifications of the proposed individ ewage disposal syste ave been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -Built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Installer. L )? in d L IJ 1-110 Receipt # ''' �r-, y Site Plan Well Permit and Soils Test iI--LC Date received Floor Plan N A Water Quality Test or Lz ` Date Info Complete Received by e_ Comm Dev Approval t.; fi Water System Letter Final Insp Requested Final Inspection Approval:_ / ( �l?"=+� InlA E 11,, zu? Date: t i` 9 APEHD 10/96 0. 1 1 ... . V_' 1 I Contact Log Sheet v Name 5..e Parcel ID Street address oa-j�p WOM Date Received: Application Fee Perc test Soil profile _ ra 1 0 Water Qualit y 15g Site plan House floor plan/?- 0 _Water Quantity . 1jcv - 1 / 'f s ,U Date PersonSpokenTo Comments / Action to be Taken Initials WOM /moi �J�1__MI_ • A r- --�� I DATE , • • 'J ��i/I ■ ■ YOUR CALL COIDE NUMBER t=XTENSIT eSE CALL MESSAGE/ WILL CALL r / ' e , r. r e . YOU W ,WANTS TO SEE YOU_ M 4006 / 1jcv - 1 / 'f s ,U EOC i E.O. CHL CH, INC. At% �tJl 5 ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS G y -3 June 8, 1998 TODD HABERMANN CONSTRUCTION P.O. BOX 1210 BASALT, CO 81621 i 1�SEP 1 C 1998 ENVIRONMENTA! HEALTH ASPEN / PITKIN Subject: Drip Irrigation Onsite Wastewater System Soil Moisture Monitoring 01.69 North Starwood Drive Lot 14R, Starwood Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 8052 Dear Mr. Habermann, We visited the site on May 28, 1998 to observe the drip irrigation field, and to obtain the soil moisture samples as required by the Pitkin County OWS permit. The results of moisture testing are attached. The results of observations indicate the OWS is operating adequately. If there are any questions, please call. 06 h E. 0. CHURCH INC .A- 31 ;•y•°'•C. T 7d Edward 0. Church, P . E ..`• 6- 3 copies sent cc: Pitkin County Environmental Health, ATTN: Nancy MacKenzie CC: NEWS, LTD, ATTN: Bob Nelson 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80437-2869 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 r� TABLE I - SOILS MOI URE TESTING RESULTS DRIP IRRIGATION ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM N e tuber 1996 ov, SAMPLE LOCATION* SOIL DRY DENSITY MOISTURE % SATURATION TYPE PCF CONTENT, % 1 TRENCH 12 @ 18' TOPSOIL - 57.3 38 2 TRENCH 12 @ 30' ORGANIC CLAY 42 64.2 70 3 TRENCH 6 @ 50' ORGANIC CLAY 66 34.7 59 4 TRENCH 10 @ 15' ORGANIC CLAY 60 41.8 62 June 19, 1 1997 TRENCH 7 @ 18' ORGANIC CLAY 99 19.0 82 2 TRENCH 7 @ 100' ORGANIC CLAY 74 37.4 78 3 TRENCH 14 @ 70' ORGANIC CLAY 98 20.4 75 4 TRENCH 17 @ 50' ORGANIC CLAY 78 19.4 45 May 28, SAMPLE 1998 LOCATION* SOIL DRY DENSITY MOISTURE % SATURATION TYPE PCF CONTENT, % 1 TRENCH 22 @ 90' CLAY 98* 24.5 91 2 TRENCH 12 @ 50' CLAY, SANDY 98* 16.9 63 3 TRENCH 10 @ 10' CLAY 98* 17.4 65 4 TRENCH 5 @ 70' CLAY, SANDY 98* 20.3 75 * Density based on the maximum prior density which determines maximum saturation. * Trenches numbered from bottom and distance is from manifold in feet. JOB NO. 8052 EOC -� E.O. CHUB*,- INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS July 28, 1997 'V1 5 "1 TODD HABERMANN CONSTRUCTION P.O. BOX 121.0 (- -^.. . C BASALT, CO 81621 jl9 � JUS 199 Subject: Drip Irrigation Onsite Wastewater Si��F,.- Soil Moisture Testing��rol;4Lir� 0169 North Starwood Drive Lot 14R, Starwood Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Habermann, We have visited the lot several times in May 7; June 11 and 16; and July 18, 1997 to observe the drip irrigation field, and to obtain the soil moisture samples as required by the Pitkin County OWS permit. The results are moisture testing is attached. The results of observa- tions indicate the OWS is operating adequately. At the May, 1997 visit, there was water leaking from the collector ditch which flowed onto the drip irrigation field. There had been settlement of soil at several distribution lines. Remedial measures were discussed and have been implemented. Rocks larger than 6 inches were removed and low areas were filled. Four samples were obtained from the drip irrigation field area. The results of the soil moisture testing and saturation of the soil is presented on TABLE I. If there are any questions, please call. E. 0. CHURCH, INC Edward 0. Chu 3 copies sent E 13172 x; :7- zot p�••�z`t`' U16NAL � cc: Pitkin County Environmental Health, ATTN: 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 Nancy MacKenzie P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80437-2869 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 Tenches numbered from bottom and distance is from end of lines in feet. JOB NO. 8052 TABLE I - SOILS MOIE TESTING RESULTS DRIP IRRIGATION ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM July 18, 1997 1 TRENCH 5A @ 32' CLAY 99 19.0 72 2 TRENCH 8A @ 44' ORGANIC CLAY 74 37.4 78 3 TRENCH 24A @ 80' CLAY 98 20.4 75 4 TRENCH 8B @ 45' ORGANIC CLAY 78 19.4 45 Tenches numbered from bottom and distance is from end of lines in feet. JOB NO. 8052 12-09-1996 12:13PM FROM E.0 CHLRCH_hERRITT HOLISE TO 19709205197 P.02 EO E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS December 9, 1996 TODD HABERMANN CONSTRUCTION P.O.: Box 1210 Basalt, CO 81621 Subject: OWS Installation Observation ,t Lot 14R, Starwood Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 8052 Dear -Mr. Habermann,., We observed the installation of the repair OwS at the subject site during November and December, 1996. The purpose of our observation was to confirm Che repair was installed in conformance with our design dated November 15, 1996. The entire 7200 SF was installed, which would allow abandonment of the original trenches, but the original trenches was also retained. Access to the drip irritation field was "teed" from the pump line 17 feet.south of the lift station. Two 2 inch ball valves were installed to allow access to either the new field or the original trenches. Two irrigation boxes were installed with five distribution outlets of two inch ball valves. The drip -irrigation trenches were installed in the general conformance with the design. The length of the two south- ern section, Sections 4 and 5 were changed from 100 to 80 feet which resulted in 15 rather than 12 lines as indicated on the attached Fig. 1. The area of the drip irrigation field is 7200 SF in 3600 lineal feet of 2 inch drip irrigation line. Two items remain which are: 1, extending of the 24 inch culvert to beyond the 7_imit of the drip irrigation field in the ditch above the field, and 2. final grading to smooth the Surface of the field. We understand the final two items will be done before July of 1997. If there are E. 0. CHURCH, Edward 0. 3 copies sent �h`"a4�•• please call. a0 0. C�'•_c�' N 1 .F. Z copy faxed to: Pitkin County Health Department, ATTN: Nancy MacKenzie 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80437.2889 (809) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 12-09-1996 12:14PM FROM E. 0. MRC-Uh ITT HOUSE TO 5ECTICN LINES LENGTH. FEET 1 5 100 2 8 100 3 8 100 A 8 s0 5 7 80 T07ALS . '•_=.KE+.L FEET. 3600 SCS.AF.£ FEET. 7200 .108 NO- 8052 1000 GALLON 2 COMPARTMENT TANK wiPLIMP IN 2ND CHokMEER EXISTING 1500 GAL, TMJ< 172' Two 2 INCH E9ALL VALVES 4 INCH SEWF;L I NE \ FROM HOUSE TO ORIGINAL TRENCHES 19709205197 P.03 SCALE 1 = 40 NOR'H VALVE 3OX =CP SCUTH VALVE BOX -R SEC:':CN a AND 5. 82' AS -BUILT OF REPLACEMENT OW5 FIELD FIG_ 1 TOTAL P.03 CHV. "H & Associates, li February 14, 2000 Todd Haberman Construction PO Box 1210 Basalt, CO 81621 ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS i �OA Subject: Drip Irrigation Onsite Wastewater System - Soil Moisture T Lot R-14, Starwood Village Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 8052 Gentlemen: We visited the subject site on September 22, 1999 to obtain the soil the AspeniPitkin Environmental Health Department OWS permit. The results of observations indicate the OWS is operating adequately. vubc, va—li U< <_,� ��••�•� during our visit indicated no surfacing of effluent nor condition that would suggest the system is not functioning properly. The results of the moisture testing is attached [f there are any questions, please call. Sincerely, CHURCH & Edward O. Church, 3 copies sent EOCitrp cc: APEHD, Attn: Nancy MacKenzie CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 pENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat R(dge, CO 80033 CEVERGREEN 303.816.1455 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9921 TABLE I - SOIL MOISTV ESTING RESULTS DRIP IRRIGAI Orq ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTr ivl SAMPLE LOCATION* NOVEMBER, 1996 1 TRENCH 12 at 18' 2 TRENCH 12 @ 30' 3 TRENCH 6 @ 50' 4 TRENCH 10 @ 15' JUNE 19, 1997 1 TRENCH @ 18' 2 TRENCH 7 @ 100' 3 TRENCH 14 cu 70' 4 TRENCH 17 @ 50' MAY 28,1998 1 TRENCH 22 tc 90' 2 TRENCH 12 L 50' 3 TRENCH 10 (ir) 10' 4 TRENCH 5 @ 70' SEPTEMBER 22, 1999 1 SW CORNER 2 NW CORNER 3 NE CORNER 4 SE CORNER SOIL DRY DENSITY TYPE PCF TOPSOIL 33 ORG CLAY 42 ORG CLAY 66 ORG CLAY 60 MOISTURE CONTENT,% 57.3 64.2 34.7 41.8 % SATURATION 38 70 59 62 ORG CLAY 99 19.0 82 ORG CLAY 74 37.4 78 ORG CLAY 98 20.4 75 ORG CLAY 78 19.4 45 CLAY 98** 24.5 91 CLAY, SANDY 98** 16.9 63 CLAY 98** 17.4 65 CLAY, SANDY 98** 20.3 75 CLAY 93 21.6 71 CLAY 10.) 20. l 87 CLAY 97 21.0 77 CLAY, SANDY 78 29.1 97 ** Density based on the maximum prior density which determines maximum saturation * Trenches numbered from bottom and distance is from manifold in feet. JOB NO. 8052 FFt01•1 : :JI'B'S IM OF OfF Qr , PHOT E NO. : 605-734-4i 11 ;OV. 1T 1996 06: i4pM PO, Fax Transmittal Memo � „�> , � :�.�. .�,, Toro IC C•4 7•tf-Y. G7i: isC-.(= i Flom Gxr�ny GomD�nY LornMnn LCCAKM Debt. Chbp. t'er l' / I TBMDMr�r FU# T6610-.4�! 4foo f. .u.N r'hK,y �.•.�aeia G' Melum LJ W11 Io, Wd60 V Wrt � soo�Acn 14e- sM Zt r) �o s tq Moprk-&,mpt&xaD pzi u E 140V -15-9E 13.53 FROM EPEC IDr yACS 9 61IRNY41MAL KMU PDAeflM Ne, have' been xwt'ifisd .that you are go.inq to install a nrip Irrigation Sewage dlaluisa.l system for your property and we wamt to. be suxq that you, the property owner, widcexataha what this means.. Thts .is. an altai'1'sative inerhnls of Wttttewatet disposal not pzovias►wj for in tlie. Pitkin County ROVIA174011a, As. •suWi, it Las bion declared an pxporimental systak and the installation of a total. of eight sttcki SYSitems have, been approuad. Attachad' is a copy 'of R•CSpluticri 996-1,34 which was 'adept6d,by the .Pitkin County Board of commissioners, acting As the Pitkixa Cuusty Board of stealth. We- request that you read ,the; oonditiion, of Phfk rP,nlution• and sign rhP hottom of thit. letter sta,ttnq that YPLL ' Und6ra-i:pnd these conditions_ We have takteii, these precautions, becatse"Drip Irrigation :Le ash oxperimentpl •eypt*aM in this area., SeVOI-+l hvsidre:t of 'Chese syst:llle hiv* bears insteiled *A the 'Eastern Slop®. However, we'.do not have hisLurical data too iuiok how the •syseem Will perform at tris altitude send in Cha extreige and varyiyiej w"tber conuita,cns ,we exaerior,ca. , home conditions that Mint be., met befnrA Ws, nn" issue your septic .pal�ilt ars, .aa fel i:ewet l • TO a '"water balance ".method of caic"e.'JAQ waste load,is apyli6d,' a musilLuLliiy plan inusL be lsubnAted to determine saturatiein ar.nrlsr, of soils. e A "*&; Wt be -0ta WvUloure- the. systdtA ins iyaLaljhd, has a tinlll l:.�pdc;tipn perforweci by. the; design engineer, a.nd that a Tina] ''nn-huiltF iR drawing ��; ided to' thin. esstgartmont. -It has hAAA, deteraoripd thst the last -be =ox ons aad a half (1-1/2)• times the • amount o2 the LAittllition cost of the 'syatpm. • 1 After'instpilatiois, you must provide a written report to this. "Department dGeumentinq mftintentuLce on the aystft for a period of five years, and submitted to this Dwilrtitment in January. of saah 264 Perth Rrarvnnd Drye'• • Ae�s�n, f.rilnrydo.N1411 Owner Swatwe Date Wmwe of Prco"tY 130 Qbypl 4 m, ;$.ur . Aim, Ctimim 31611 rove soi,Fio mn 141 n3moJ19f i 0 ' ^ PITKIN COUNTY 506 E. MAIN � ASPEN, CO 81611 (303) 920-5170 RECEIPT # 160048 Date: 11/20/96 Time: 16:0048 Cashier: 01 Station: 01 Reference: MISC RECEIPTS .Account Number: 000000 Ledger Account: 001000000037369 Code: MR997 Amount: $9,000.00 'Program: CHECK:# 6957 PAID BY:DEPOSIT/WISE, WM A Amount tendered: CASH .00 CHECK 9,000.00 TOTAL 9,000.00 � CHANGE .00 .,a PAY TO THE ORDER OF WILLIAM A. WiaE P. O. BOX 1492 EL PASO, TX 79978 6957 19Q( 32-115/1110 DATE yv_ I I $ /co'o_" DOLLARS 8 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Texas EL PASO OFFICE Commerce 201 EAST MAIN Bank EL P,1SO, TEXAS 79901 - �: 08-06-1996 03:02PM FROM 0. CHURCH-hERRITT HOUSE TO 19709205197 P.03 a r EOCi �- n E.O. CHURCH, INC. ! ` ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS ! AuauSt 5, 1996 ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ATTN: Nancy MacKenzie and Tom Dunlop 130 Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Subject: Soil Moisture Monitoring Drip Irrigation OWS Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Dunlop, We are submitting the toiiowing soil moisture monitoring program for the proposed drip irrigation OWS in Pitkin County for the experimental drip irrigation systems. Base line soils data would be obtained at OWS construction. The test- ing would include moisture and density of the native soil. A minimum of 5 soil moisture samples would be obtained and tested dur- ing May of each year. One sample must be from a drip irrigation sec- tion which is open and one may be from the section which is closed. The three remaining samples would be randomly obtained from trench areas based on a random number generator system. The samples would be obtained from a depth of 12 to 30 inches using a JMC BACKSAVER SOIL SAMPLER or AMS SOIL RECOVERY PROBE. Based on the soil moisture test- ing a report indicating: 1. location of tests, 2. moisture/density and 3. percent saturation will be reported. If the percent saturation exceeds 90% in two of the three samples and there is no evidence of surfacing, additional samples will be obtained in August. Any evi- dence of surfacing would first require closing of that section of the field and monitoring. if there are any questions, please call. E. O. CHURCH, INC. Edward 0. Church, P.E. 2 copies sent: 925 East 17th Avanue a Denver, Colorado 8021 &1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80437-2869 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3617 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674.0813 TOTAL P.03 v 0 O Date: 2/10/97. - ASPEN PITKIN To: Pitkin County Finance Department ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTHPITKIPARTMENT From: Tom -Dunlop, Director, Environmental Health Department Re: Bond posted for Experimental Drip Irrigation ISDS Please release the $9,000 posted as bond by William Wise. Condition #11 of Resolution #96-134 has been met. I 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1975 • PHONE 970.920.5070 • FAx 970.920.5197 Printed on Recycled Paper Dear Mr. Habermann, Per telephone conversations with you and Nancy MacKenzie of the Pitkin Countv Health Department, we are providing this letter to clarify conditions. The three question include: 1. a statement of whether there is an odor for the drip irrigation system, 2. whether a filter will be required at the pump, and 3. defining of wet conditions for installation. Per a request from the Starwood Homeowner's Association with respect to odor, there should be no odor different from a typical operating septic system. Any noticeable odor would be at the time the septic tank is pumped and should only be for an hour. No ongoing odor should be noted. Because there was an existing pump system, we did not require the installation of a screen filter at the pump. Apparently the Pitkin County resolution requires the installation of the screen filter. We recommend the installation of an Orenco ES 1548 Effluent Screen. The screen can be installed when the new two inch service line is install- ed to the drip irrigation field. We recommend the installation of a 4 foot section of Orenco Riser above the screen filter and the exist- ing risers be installed at the first tank. Ms. MacKenzie asked whether the drip irrigation could be installed at this time because of her concern about "wet" conditions of the soil. Based on the conditions found at the time of the percolation tests last week, the wet soil was confined to the upper 3 to 6 inches of soil in the field area. We believe the drip irrigation field can be installed yet this fall. If there is snow, snow should not be mixed with soil to backfill the trenches. With installation of drip lines in trenches, the trenches will only be open for short periods of time and should not create a problem. If the weather forecast indicates snow, only limited amounts of trench should be opened. It is our understanding the owner, Mr. Wise, has decided to install the entire 7200 square feet of drip irrigation field. We recommend the existing trenches remain connected to the system and used when there is limited occupancy of the residence or on a backup basis. 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 13U431-288 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 EOC E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS November 15, 1996fIiIIv0V 1 8 1996 I� I ` TODD HABERMANN CONSTRUCTION P.O. BOX 1210 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Basalt, CO 81621 ASPEN / PITKIN Subject: Repair Onsite Wastewater System Design, addendum Lot 14R, Starwood • 0269 North Starwood Drive Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 8052 Dear Mr. Habermann, Per telephone conversations with you and Nancy MacKenzie of the Pitkin Countv Health Department, we are providing this letter to clarify conditions. The three question include: 1. a statement of whether there is an odor for the drip irrigation system, 2. whether a filter will be required at the pump, and 3. defining of wet conditions for installation. Per a request from the Starwood Homeowner's Association with respect to odor, there should be no odor different from a typical operating septic system. Any noticeable odor would be at the time the septic tank is pumped and should only be for an hour. No ongoing odor should be noted. Because there was an existing pump system, we did not require the installation of a screen filter at the pump. Apparently the Pitkin County resolution requires the installation of the screen filter. We recommend the installation of an Orenco ES 1548 Effluent Screen. The screen can be installed when the new two inch service line is install- ed to the drip irrigation field. We recommend the installation of a 4 foot section of Orenco Riser above the screen filter and the exist- ing risers be installed at the first tank. Ms. MacKenzie asked whether the drip irrigation could be installed at this time because of her concern about "wet" conditions of the soil. Based on the conditions found at the time of the percolation tests last week, the wet soil was confined to the upper 3 to 6 inches of soil in the field area. We believe the drip irrigation field can be installed yet this fall. If there is snow, snow should not be mixed with soil to backfill the trenches. With installation of drip lines in trenches, the trenches will only be open for short periods of time and should not create a problem. If the weather forecast indicates snow, only limited amounts of trench should be opened. It is our understanding the owner, Mr. Wise, has decided to install the entire 7200 square feet of drip irrigation field. We recommend the existing trenches remain connected to the system and used when there is limited occupancy of the residence or on a backup basis. 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 13U431-288 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 If -there are E. O. CHURCH, Edward O. Ch EOC 3 copies sent Pitkin County Depart of Health, ATTN: Nancy MacKensie xc: Nelson Environmental and Wastewater, Ltd. EOC FMO E.O. CHURCH, INC. -ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS November 11, 1996 TODD HABERMANN CONSTRUCTION P.O. BOX 1210 Basalt, CO 81621 Subject: Repair Onsite Wastewater Lot 14R, Starwood 0269 North Starwood Drive Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 8052 Dear Mr. Habermann, System Design As requested, we have observed subsurface conditions in test pits, performed percolation tests, and reviewed subsurface data and the Onsite Wastewater System (OWS) recommendations by Nelson Environmental and Wastewater Solutions, Ltd., (Nelson) dated October 11 and 12, 1994 and as -built plans. The purpose of our review was to evaluate subsur- face conditions and to design a repair OWS. SITE CONDITIONS - The lot is an approximate 4 acre lot in a rural area of Pitkin County, Colorado. The location of the existing residence, profile pits and percolation tests are presented on Fig. 1. The slope at the proposed field area is 15% to 26% to the west\southwest. The ground surface has a moderate cover of native grasses and sparse cover of scrub oak. The site is not in a confined drainage area and has moderate to good solar and wind exposure. EXISTING CONSTRUCTION - A 4 bedroom residence exists as indicated on Figs. 1 and 2. The OWS for the residence is sized based on the struc- ture having greater than 5000 square feet (SF), actual 7000 SF. The sewage loading for a 5000+ SF 4 bedroom dwelling is 1040 gallons per day (GPD), based on 2 people per bedroom and 130 GPD per person. The design loading includes a garbage grinder, dish washer and washing machine. Water is provided by public water service. Discharge from any water softener, spa or pool should not be directed to the OWS. The Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) permit for the house was issued 11-1-94 and the permit was finaled by Pitkin County 12-6-95. We understand the house was occupied in December, 1995. The existing drain field consists of 7 trenches of 12 infiltrator chambers with an area of 1.484 SF, which is equivalent to 2968 SF of gravel drain field. EXPERIMENTAL DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM - The proposed drip irrigation OWS has been authorized as an experimental OWS in Pitkin County. As a part of the authorization, there will be conditions of the permit which are not typical of a permit in Pitkin County. The conditions include: 1. the applicant must commit to follow recommendations of the department and the design engineer, 2. a backup system design is required, 3. monitoring of soil saturation will be required and must be reported 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, uotoraao bU4J/-?.bby (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 r 2 for 5 years, an annual report of the soil moisture will be required for 5 years, 5. the site must be reviewed for solar and wind exposure to wind, 6. the Department will allow design without a 1.5 peaking factor, and 7. you or your installer will be required to post a bond for the installation of the system, with release of the bond with approval of the installation by the Department, the design engineer, and the provision of an as -built drawing. The primary condition which will affect you is having a bond posted for installation. With respect to the remaining conditions: 1. you must agree to the terms of the permit; 2. a backup design is a sand ETA design in the same area; 3. monitoring as described later in this letter will be required which will include an annual report as described in Item 4; 4. the site has been reviewed as described under Site Conditions and found suitable for installation of a drip irrigation OWS; 5. the Department will allow the construction of the OWS without a 1.5 peaking factor; and 6. requires the bonding of the installation cost. Another drip irriga- tion system has been installed in Pitkin County, so we r!o not expect any problems with installation or performance of the OWS. Two other drip irrigation systems have been designed with one installed this fall and it is anticipated the second will be installed next summer. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - Subsurface conditions were investigated by ex- cavating 2 test pits at the locations indicated on Fig. 1. Subsurface conditions consist of 1 foot of dark gray silty topsoil underlain to 2.5 to 5 feet by stiff grayish brown sandy clay underlain by reddish brown clay to depths of 6 to 9 feet. No free water was encountered nor was observed 1 day after excavation in the profile pits. Percola- tion rates ranged from 60 to 120 minutes per inch (MPI). The average percolation rate of 90 MPI. A summary of subsurface data is presented as TABLE I. RECOMMENDATIONS'- The repair drip irrigation field is proposed to the north-northwest of residence as indicated on Fig. 2. The drip irriga- tion field will be accessed through the two existing septic tanks with a pump in the second chamber of the second tank. The first existing septic tank is a 1500 gallon single compartment precast concrete sep- tic tank and the second is a 1000 gallon two compartment concrete tank. There is 2100 gallons of septic tank capacity in the existing tanks. The septic tanks and pump from the original installation meet 1996 Pitkin County septic tank regulations. The drip irrigation field area is based on 1040 GPD loading for a 4 bedroom home, 32 inches of lake evaporation per year based on the US Department of Commerce Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 37, and at- tached water balance design, Fig. 2. The area of field required is 7,200 SF, as presented on Figs. 3 and 4. We recommend the field be installed in five sections with three sections of 1600 SF and two sec- tion of 1200 SF as indicated on Fig. 3. With the three 1600 SF sec- tions, there would be two manifolds of 8 lines in 4 trenches. With the two 1200 SF sections, there would be two manifolds of 6 lines in 3 trenches. The final drip irrigation field configuration can be modi- fied to fit the topography with approval of our office. The trenches should be backfilled to reestablish the original slope. An alternative utilizing the existing trenches is possible. The exist- ing trencher would be credited as 1200 SF of field, resulting in the 3 requirement of 6000 SF of drip irrigation field. The drip irrigation field would be installed in two 1600 SF sections and two 1400 SF sect- ions as indicated on Figs. 5 and 6. Based on the performance of the existing trenches, they may not recover and additional drip irrigation field may be needed. Two additional valves should be installed to allow installation of sections of drip irrigation field. With the five sections of drip irrigation field, we recommend the operation of the OWS with 4 of the 5 sections at any time. The fifth section can be allowed to "rest". The resting section should be switched annually. If the owner is anticipating finishing of additional bedrooms in un- finished areas or additions, we recommend the OWS be constructed to handle the additional loading. The installation of a properly sized OWS to serve future buildout can be cost effective. The existing sep- tic tank configuration will serve up to a 4 bedroom residence of 5000 SF. For greater than 4 bedrooms, the septic tank must be upsized to 500 gallons per bedroom. Each additional bedroom larger than 4 bed- rooms would require an additional 1800 SF of drip irrigation field. We recommend the surface of the evapotranspiration and absorption (ETA) field be seeded after installation of the system. A good native grass cover will promote evapotranspiration (E -T). We recommend a pasture seed mix available at seed stores. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed over the field. The owner must realize an OWS is different from public sewer service. The owner must assume the responsibility for maintenance of the sys- tem. The system is relatively maintenance free, but the owner must have the septic tanks pumped. We recommend the tank be pumped every 2 years. There are daily considerations, such as not putting plastic or other nonbiodegradable material into the system. Water use must be monitored so toilets are not allowed to run when seals malfunction. To illustrate the point, a running toilet will consume in excess of 1000 gallons per day if allowed to run. An excess 1000 GPD loading could flood and irreparably harm the field. We caution against installation of a water softener. The hydraulic loading from the backwash of a water softener can be detrimental to OWS and a separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash waste, if a water softener is installed. No landscaping or plastic can be used over the field, which will reduce evapotranspiration from the field. Chemically treated water from a swimming pool or spas should not be introduced into the OWS. As a part of the Permit, there will be conditions imposed by the Pit- kin County Health Department. One condition which will be different from normal installations will be the requirement for bonding of the installation of the drip irrigation system. This is required because of prior poor experiences in Pitkin County with experimental systems. A drip irrigation system was installed in Pitkin County and there have not problems with the installation. Seven of the eight conditions will have been met with completion of the installation and only an annual reporting of soil moisture conditions and performance of the system 1 4 e will be required. We anticipate the annual reporting requirement -for 5 years and is estimated to cost $125.00 per year. If the drip irriga- tion OWS performs as the existing system has, we would apply to have the monitoring period reduced to 3 years. LIMITATIONS - An drip irrigation design requires installation by a contractor who is an experienced installer. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted. If subsurface conditions considerably different from those described in this report are encountered, we should evaluate the effect of the changes on the proposed OWS. If modifications to this design are made by governing Health Departments, we should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the performance of o S design. p0 RE(, If there are any _ l7tl'�� ease call. E. O. CHURCH, Edward O. Chur EOC 3 copies sent xc: Nelson Environmental and Wastewater, Ltd. SCALE is. 4 0' y'. ,' a . t ~ 0 ' ' ` �` _ 1\ `11 T\ \` `\ \` 1 \\ t 1 F OUND r 1 rt CAP - 1 IK)Rr. CONIROI y` 1 \ -ia�.a• \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ y 1 \ { i y l 1 �. 1 1 1 1 � \y \\ 1 "� \ 1 1 � 1 1 1 \ I \ \1 \\ 1\ 1 1 t l �\ \ ; � 1 \ \\ 1 1 • j 1�+ \ 1 1 1 1 y 1 \\ y \\ 1\ y 1 1 \1 \ 17 1 \ \ 1 \ \ \ 1 1 I1 l 1 1 \ \ t \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 y 1 1 1 I I \ \ \r 1 1 14 ARFh - .9291 ACR 51 . /-, b\ \ / I RECbRD 1 4.0 I 1+ \ \ ` + I \ � r I I 1 1 I i• \ I //// /'/ /'/ /�/ //i /I / 1 �' ( / I I I i I I ij II l i • I 1 i // /' ♦' / ,' // / r l � I I I I I I I I o� // / / / / / / ' 1 1 ' I I I I 11 1 � � • 11,E ., / / / / / / / ' l r i I 1 ► I - ,AO .' / Irrigation bitch / ! / t I I I I I XISTING RESIDENCE - 7— — %�� _ _ • eptic Tank tpumping Chamber / E / I 1 OP rTIEN O T TS - / =-♦- --may—Irrigation DitciL��,ia, r SUBDIVISION 4 BEDROOMS 0.15 ABSORPTION (GPD/SF) WATER BUDGET ANALYSIS OWNER STARWOOD LOT R-14 NOR-TH STARWOOD DRIVE, 0269 PERCOLATION RATE, 90 MPI ETA W. WISE FIELD AREA JOB NO. 8052 SUBSURFACE: E . CHURCH, INC. 7200 SQUARE FEET--- _- ------------ -- CLIENT T. HABERMANN CONSTRUCITON _ _ _ OUTFLOW REQUIRED INFLOW ETA ETA STORAGE STORAGE, GAL LOADING PRECIPITATION RUNOFF, 25% NETPRECIP. NETPRECIP. TOTAL LOAD ABSORPTION ET GAL./BEDROOM BEDROOMS GALLONS INCHES INCHES INCHES GAI-LoNS GALLONS GPD/SF 0.15 GPDlOSF�6 GOD158 GALLONS GALLONS 4 68 OCTOBER 8060 4 32240 5.1 1.275 3 825 17029 49269 NOVEMBER 7800 4 31200 4.3 1.075 3.225 14358 45558 0.15 0.024 0.174 37584 -7974 39394 0.15 0.020 0.1697 37877 -4714 DECEMBER 8060 4 32240 3.1 0.775 2 325 10351 42591 34680 �_ 0.15 0.016 0.1661 37074 -5083 29597 JANUARY 8060 4 32240 2.97 0.743 2.228 9917 42157 FEBRUARY 7280 4 29120 4.07 1.018 3 053 13590 42710 0.15 0.016 0.1664 33546 -9163 20434 MARCH 8060 4 32240 6.53 1.633 4 898 21804 54044 0.15 0.022 0.1723 38457 -15586 4847 APRIL 7800 4 31200 3.8 0.950 2850 12688 43888 0.15 0.039 01893 40889 -2999 1841 MAY 8060 4 32240 3.08 0.770 2 310 10284 42524 0.15 0.067 0,2174 48524 6000 7848 JUNE 7800 4 31200 2.53 0.633 1 898 8448 39648 0.15 0,156 0,3057 66031 26384 34231 . 0.800 2 400 10685 42925 0.15 0 266 0.4161 92874 49949 48470 JULY 8060 4 32240 3.2 AUGUST 8060 4 32240 2.45 0.613 1838 8181 40421 0.15 0.082 0.2316 51693 11273 48470 SEPTEMBER 7800 4 31200 5.08 1.270 3 810 16962 48162 0.15 0.121 0.2707 58471 10309 48470 TOTAL 94900 379600 46.21 11.553 34.656 154295 533895 0.15 0.075 0.225 591186.2 57291 TREA-D ENTREQVBEMENTS EXISTING ONE 1500 GALLON TWO COMPARTMENT TANK ONE 1000 GALLON TWO COMPARTMENT TANK WITH PUMP IN SECOND 400 GALLON CHAMBER JOB NO. 8052 FIELD DESIGN; 7200 SQUARE FEET FIG. 2 of FRIO t4OTE' TOTAL PROPO D - 7200 SFr VP - D• _ `� \ " FOUNO PI{'F CSP \ _ �' _ ` 1 \ {IOIt R1, CONIROI i �- 1 t I 1 1 I - • - 1 -...� ` \` \� \ \\ \ -- T ;- \ t ` 1i1 Ir�c;ai6R\ It �\ \ It \\ `\I 1\ \` `\ \\ 1 11 1 ' \\ t 1 101* \Q IP Di 4 800% 1 F\ d%F 1 \ 1 1\ �` \t \` 1 IR i kFtf14A I IIIV L yD 1 ►1 1 11 t 1 1 1 . \I \\ \` �\ 1\ ` \\ 1 ► 1 ,\� \ �I'�\ CT I�10 11 i 1 1 1 \I `� \I SCALE J �\ �► 1 \ 1 \ \ \ `� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 t tw -_ 40 I \ 1 1 \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ t \ 1 \ \\ 1 1 1 1 It S T �� '\T i N\ V AVMI 1 1 Ij i i -i &R P\\k\R R\ \\6 TIA 4,Jtq\ \\o\I\ \9CT 44*\\ ARF, - .9291A / CbRD 1 4.Ob I 1� 11 \\ \\\\1 1 1 `I 11 \ \ \ \\ AlijRE t 11 I I• t I� ' ,' ,' i 1 , r •, !rr I I tl t // / / / 1 r r !r •1 I ! I l l i . I t 1 I I I // / / / / !r r rr � I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I • t �I ,o � / / , / / / / / / 1' 1 I I I I I I I i � • �� / / / / / , , / rr 1 / , , I I I I ► i to .� // // / / / / 1 r / I I I I I I • Irrigation bitch / / / 1 I I I ► I I-- --- '-2-AlNC�-1-�P�� 1L i 9 ANG/51 fPLPI ptic ank� pumping Chamber. 3 rA V Pj,'Lt v , — - 3" PVC Manifold ; ! r , _EXISTING/PErSIpEN o��b irs i ,� Irrigation Ditch- lo, itch__�i ,'� • EXISTING SEPTIC TANK N0: SECTION -LENGTH -- WIDTH LINES - 3 A 100 16 8 EXISTING PUMPING CHAMBER 2 B 100 12 6 2' BALL VALVE�, rte. n n o o INFLUENT LINE DISTRIBUTION VALVES OR SURGE TANK 2 C �� CC pp�� ~ H JSHON ASINCH�CE�?VTERSPE WITH 1/4 INCH HEADERS f- TWO FOOT ON CENTER SPACING MANIFOLDS T ' I 100. I A. TYPICAL FIELD PLAN 3( 24' 24- �i B. TYPICAL FIELD CROSS-SECTION TREATMENT UNIT 'I. ONE 1500 ONE COMPARTMENT. AND ONE 1000 TWO COMPARTMENT SEPTIC TANKS WITH PUMP IN SECOND CHAMBER OF THE SECOND TANK 2. PUMP EXISTING 3. ALARM/CONTROL LOCATION AT OWNERS REQUEST 4. RISERS (6) TO SURFACE 5. DRAIN BACK TO PUMP CHAMBER OR FIELD C. SPECIFICATIONS JOB N0. 8052 VENT rI GROUND SURFACE ONSITE of 'lo 0 DISTRIBUTION FIELD I. BEDROOMS 4. LOAD (Q GAL.) 1040 2. PERCOLATION RATE (MPI) g0 3. AREA - 7200 SF. SEE WATER BALANCE 4. FIELD AREA (SQ. FT.) 7200 5. FIELD LINE (LN. FT.) 3600 6. TRENCH SIZE= 24 INCHES 7. LANDSCAPING BY OWNER FIELD DETIALS FIG. 4 1 TA \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ t 1\ FOUND PIPE CAP 1 \ \ \ IHJR1. CONJRDI • _- •--��Ia1AR F \ \ \ \ y 1 \ I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ \\\ 1 ir• — -lal .a ` \ 1 \ \ \ \ 1 1 \ i ; 11 1 1 � i 1 1 1 1 11 \ 1 � \ 1 1 1 1 I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 ; ``\ ` y 1 � \\ 1\�1p 1 1 • 1 1 \ + � 1 it 1 1 dlF OF ff \\ \\ 11 \\ \\ 1 ► \\ 1\ \\ T I'P \ 1 R I A t� IEL 1 1 SCALE IN kk6I \I. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ + 1 \\ 1 \ \ T' O S+ 1 = 4 0' �\ \\ \\ \\ \\ 11 \ 1 11 1\ \\ • \\� \\ \\ \ \ \ '\ 6 \\ \\ I y + y 1 11 TRI O-N \yVAIsl I/ I ARFE. - .9291 ACR S 11• / 1 y 1 1 \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` 1 \ \ \ / I RECbRD 4•0� 1 1\ 11 1 1 I\ 1 1 1 1 \ \\\\ \ 11 / , , , / ! 1 l !r ! I I I 1 1 I I I I I • ' / i / i / / l ! l r l I I I ► i /// /,� /// /,/ 2-/ P E// (•o i. l/ / / / / / / / r r l ( I I I I I I I NOTE: t3TrNG�F+ELD �� / / BE x I Z E-9 / Irrigation Ditch // I I I 1 1 ITH .PA��0SED L6 �� ' i' l l l l r I i _ l I g ILI l>/I HSI S I E Ff 6f1—/� fii�t'�O F7-41f,acAL)t F'0" PU�t EXISTING RESIDE CE I I A- 1 _ _ optic T k • — �4 l , / / / / / // / I Pumpng Chamber / harem l 11 'oe r /• / / ' ! r 3' PVC Manifold i♦ '1�•'•'0 --- S — — S / -oe --i - - J.� B� . tl L//' - — / �'�--�/— •��c -__.Irrigation Drtch EXISTING SEPTIC TANK EXISTING PUMPING CHAMBER 2" BALL VALVE - ,/�� r_ . DISTRIBUTION - VALVES OR SURGE TANK HEADERS MANIFOLDS NO. I SECTION LENGTH WIDTH LINES 5 1 A 100 12 6 INFLUENT LINE 2 INCHONBSIN200CH CENTERSPE VITH I/4 INCH r TWO FOOT ON CENTER SPACING T A. TYPICAL FIELD PLAN 3C 1- 24 2� B. TYPICAL FIELD CROSS-SECTION TREATMENT UNIT I. ONE 1500 ONE COMPARTMENT. AND ONEIOOO TWO COMPARTMENT SEPTIC TANKS WITH PUMP IN SECOND CHAMBER OF THE SECOND TANK 2. PUMP EXISTING 3. ALARM/CONTROL LOCATION AT OWNER'S REQUEST 4. RISERS (6) TO SURFACE 5. DRAIN BACK TO PUMP CHAMBER OR FIELD C. SPECIFICATIONS JOB NO. 8052 VENT n DISTRIBUTION FIELD I. BEDROOMS 4: LOAD (0 GAL.) 1040 2, PERCOLATION RATE (MPI) 90 3. AREA - 7200 SF. SEE WATER BALANCE 4. FIELD AREA (SQ. FT.) 6000 INCLUDING EXISTING 1484 SF OF CHAMBERS (CREDITTED 1200 SF OF FIELD) 5. FIELD LINE (LN. FT.) 3000 6. TRENCH SIZE= 24 INCHES 7. LANDSCAPING BY OWNER FIELD DETIALS FIG. 6 THE DISTRIBUTION VALVES OR SURGE TANK CONTROL FLOW OF 94mawc-ENT TO EACH SECTION OF THE DISPOSAL FIELD. WE RECOMMEND THAT ONE SECTION OF THE FELD BE CLOSED AT ALL TPES TO ALLOW DRYING OF SEGMENTS OF THE FELD TO EXTEND THE LFE OF THE PU—D. THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BY SEOUENTIALLY ROTATING THE VALVES OR THE NON-PERF4RATEED TALL RISER EVERY SIX MONTHS. A_ DETAIL OF DISTRIBUTION VALVES 2" PVC LINE FROM PUMP CHAMBER 2- L14ES TO SECTIONS r�� 90 DECREE TEE" u ELBOW B. ALTERNATE SURGE TANK DETAIL KA 2" BALL VALVE ACCESS LID LEVEL i I 1 T4_ 4- i 2 _ I --OPTIONAL PERFORATED RISER OUTFALLS • I (TO DISPOSAL FIELD) TO SECTION A TO SECTION B TO SECTION C 2 INCH LINE FROM TO SECTION D. ETC. PUMP CHAMBER PIPES TO SECTIONS SHOULD SLOPE px DOWNGRADE FOR FROST PROTECTION DISTRIBUTION VALVES AND SURGE TAMC DETAIL 11'"Wiffixill-Mlowu FIG_ 7 It TABLE I - PROFILE PITS AND PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS -- - PROFILE -I- - --- 0 -O - 1FEET TOPSOIL, CLAY, SANDY GRAAYISH BROWN 1 - 2.5 FEkT, CLAY, STIFF, GRAYISH BROWN, CL 2.5 - 9 FEET, CLAY, STIFF, REDDISH BROWN, CL NO FREE WATER ENCOUNTERED TO 9 FEET NO BEDROCK ENCOUNTERED TO 9 FEET PROFILE 2 O - 1 FEET, TOPSOIL CLAY SANDY GRAAYISH BROWN 1 - 5 FEET, CLAY, S'T'IFF, GRAYISH BROWN, CL 5 - 6 FEET, CLAY, STIFF, REDDISH BROWN, CL NO FREE WATER ENCOUNTERED TO 6 FEET NO BEDROCK ENCOUNTERED TO 6 FEET PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS TEST PITS EXCAVATED AND SOAKED 11-7-96, 11 AM TEST DEPTH TIME DEPTH AT DEPTH AT CHANGE PERCOLATION MINU'T'ES START END INCHES RATE, MPI 1 41 30* 4.25 5.50 1.25 30* 5.50 7.00 1.50 30* 3.50 4.75 1.25 30* 4.75 5.75 1.25 30 6.25 7.75 1.50 30 5.00 5.50 0.50 30 5.50 6.00 0.50 30 6.00 6.25 0.25 120 2 37 30* 5.50 7.00 1.50 30* 7.00 .8.50 1.00 30* 4.25 5.50 1.50 30* 5.50 6.50 1.00 30 6.50 7.50 1.00 30 7.00 7.75 0.75 30 5.25 5.75 0.50 30 5.75 6.25 0.50 60 3 36 30* 5.25 6.25 1.00 30* 6.25 7.25 1.00 30* 3.50 4.00 0.50 30* 4.00 4.50 0.50 30 4.50 5.25 0.75 30 5.00 5.50 0.50 30 5.50 5.75 0.25 30 5.75 6.00 0.25 120 4 42 30* 4.75 6.00 2.25 30* 6.00 7.75 1.75 30* 7.75 9.25 1.50 30* 4.00 5.25 1.25 30 5.25 7.00 1.75 30 7.00 8.50 1.00 30 4.75 5.25 0.50 30 5.25 5.75 0.50 60 * - Percolation tests started on November 7, 1996 with remainder of testing done on November 8, 1996. AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE = 90 MPI JOB NO. 8052 4,06.o. Cf-zo - 4 9.24,) h /= Y'l f G a 0 OR"' I G it NJA 1. C`i3T13C xppnpVW- AAMURMP� "Iftae and entered izntc '�1iS8 A1R. of { 1 996 , by Mimi thio day o� Tru0teea of the St�xxc�+nd Home iot O sera llaaoaiatAan, a d ' j$ 1 A?ft Ae "ArciZitect�.tY31 committee• ti9,eraiYsalfter 'sL-aryic.o� f , ar..� T__" - Wise and Mar --M F. Wine Shexslnurr-ex ccalldc:L�Va+iy °��-"? . gs�c•r ins t renal roperty and tha1. owner i �tCtr.atca�.� O cOm ais �h� kn^wn &a Trmet R-14, at$r1doa4l 1LG.�a�au ai.tuaCed �.t'iQl"dCri, CORLiiIOr �( Ar 326g North 9tax'woCd Drive, btarwood Subdivision, Fitkikx County' Caiorado irinry InAf ew the "1'ragort1r' 2. Ry correspondences alraerm�i cle+�aFdGOnBtrisCtiG . i..c. , November 12. 1.996, from Todd acntractor for t:le he= on the Praperr-y, inciuciij+y _ o. Church, xnc., engineer and geologist, dated November i1, copies at which are collectively attached "hereto as �cvnar aG]Pj ia'3 to A 6r eod for the foliowi.� approval its connectten with the septic ayetem on the P%X*OrtYi Approval to augment the exiating� sePtic by "Ast tiny mddi tiws�al leach fi+�7 d and rely tod mMi f i cati to of ail _ - - ms,.r. -ti�eA!'^avl ?^_....��.++�Gai`! ..,r-•;�, „-�f .a wR Approximately 7,20U G. L . of Quip irrigacioas iidi . to the north-northwest of the Wuae and ins 1o6ated Wil! uuu�lr VA entirely' on TzACt R-14- Zao conatzuczion Lot 3- starw,^M to willi.rmj to grant spP--cIval subltct; ; ho"ver. to the tarMX and coreria %ions �� ....�. iaot a tUZI Cml��illherein contained in Cra]�l by gt�+rwcod, i a :greed a$ r -he approvati vi: Ow-ke' ' $ apPi3Cmt•ia� ;.t toilows: aPPYousl v Owner's e►pp11 cnGaon ist ,c�clyresal�r corldit:ionesd %-Won =6 C011OWLnQ 't�7Ctt1i3 =d c .rbditiC�rss s 1i Owner aCk:=wLedgea that the ewanativn Ot :7t7x4 o+?st odors or �+�rti es within the St�t]CAo_-d �d:vizicn i8 =t appropriate 4x P a IM r}_�v.. _ Stl KJ7• .J.y-ri wc.:.a . lI i .d 7 'r be ?ifiec� in shou QEsr hereby agrees that, ld Owus xiatxa �tmzn�+c od tlW; tea wri,c:l_Zct :tv the $rAr4+° of Z`YUmEi4t .5f- _ odors or sawerags are ema natl 9 auat+�m. it is the dws�rei' a obligation to farthvtir. h determines tix3 savrce of ouch odors Or �Ctviera are e1 aminate such odors or $es�rage • �t ownerhasz�at di1iccens;ly Com fenced taxing ata'Pa to eliminate 0=11 r�r� or. aewerAS c� within four (4) dUYS Of the rec+eiptp Of UUU11 at owner* a expense, shay! be motina, r-i;Fn gters,�ocd, sit maY be r�ga$pnably entitled to ta}sa Such StayS eu h r o �l in j%jat & ,n1rh odors or ar�werage . AnY neCOeaaxy gtszwbCd may' bs as'elssed# reset reaso�ly incurred by r^r?rt7�rtY r r levied and crullectOd against owner and «t r" same msnnar an $ta%vood a8!{ea Ball a co11.+eGCH aeeassm sriCsi and trteax ' ' ante frrm to he Art clsa of Starwoca Subdivision P ,iricty i�►�i - Incorporata.on of the Star- 'Ock xon�cwnery ackt�towlaa908 th" Starwood is etyitiL:cd zfl owner hereby to t�veans Of Seeking njunct:': e�s►fe�rcAt 1C1tiiw Agrixesttby ea- t0 Prev*nt the ar..alta.Micn rel i,ef , in aaditioxi to dama9 •,lam clu7cl sus t,�ra� a or a�,wmr�tt1aa fresm thePro04rtifi- The approval "her"Al granted 4PP146a 1%ly to t�}-.e Septic i irrigation 0W"+ proposed system refezr� tv ae chaa EXhiuit At ex�d r��t to any 4.!j tht r4anort etteChed . a.r.. t r:v« r �.^. rate i.n a mater wrlich '',ice d '^-e es"i system fail to o� itkiti Cos�ty Health DgpartrAnt. pr_ rrkAb] a by the p stem, proptysekI ix. t!'� Spec, -f scally, the alte�te gyx ahem is not pare og eazg raarxisu� "Po-rr. are e. -sem ETA system r in e aP#SOvAl s 7 irl all resPWCts The rep-ic 4yaC�+m shall God Y &!'1 0ppl.iaayla Starwood yro+tectiv" covenants a'nd The �zlex will govex-ntneti al rules and regulmt�Qn ill eorsPiY .. xl'l. ob��iri a perrnit rrom th'a County au3 _cnd tions set forth an Cotir�tY re�ireimsnts - i be a et:atec'1,itn ��raw�e� ae c, The disturbed arsl &f er Construction but 1104 `later thaLr r+rsc7tiC8�b Z U ..,.r = MRIN 5 i rd:4 1 LHW .i uii. T r 1Q9� Te the extent approved by r-he d4wx911 ergins$z. the ar�.a slu�,i.k Yss irXigateci ui:Lal the 9raoe �..� w +. n.,t;�- to be given pu.rsumn to thi Agreement a _ -Yi�1 - .- ..f -•_ ehal3 be given in person car d*pasitWd in the linicped e4�4aP ,tomji Y;;s p$r�1oR V rr,gi��i4Xed Or c*=-tif3.sd mail taC the adwtse0 ;r;di crud glow. or at auch other acrdras�sa a�Y l� ei A,, L. t at:md ivy virittcn riOtiCa mucce3oora or lay th#% part -cra Or their asaignal 5taLrwOod : St�r!yet�d Cy�yara� Ao iat3ori Qy, Stewart Drive A aper, C010rada 81611 AxChitectuy.!!L1 comma tGee A. give - Muac'_* F _ 'Wimp �.C. Box 1492 31 TX 79001 tar rgp�esbute that there oro Yso porsorxrs C. Ha_.: —_�" nC, �. or have or 11*n holders who ..�:e sn int�er+�et in thLne ex ►W vC this not been made Aware �� o oorise3lltad "�i7 j x�gra�nt . tun vi th and const i tu* e� L � . _ !'1 au�a•g , , n ; a ,'�„ar3�:"�''`-"-} 1. •Yt y and aRhall .1� a btirderi upon the=tle to the Subject P La siding ugors and ot�a11 IyLuxs to the banef it Of the Owner &nd .rsr persol x'aFrper,,nCaa $ta�rwood and their roapectivt.- he estate succesworm aaael.�. ns; and may bt xa¢ord+ac� in rrR rpas� e�t nd records¢ of �itkia County. i '1'hia gra srsrt ehal�. be eubJuct to axes$ E. conetrued in &Cc0%%' ncaa with4--116laws of the s .a4xa �. ��i1<.Z.tt� • T r wnY Cf the �;�si�i�ne cif this Agraemelnt or sect B:zY parLtgxap�t, sentence # clavas, phraa's• ward or vaLi .4n or the app1; �+ation the"Ofr in &ny C�ioutUBtaZltt:Hl� SIS �� «I1�st7cY' such irv$l iditY eb$li not �i_ c* the valiphT ae: }or td or - i pro,ri:�i��j, priragrepl�, aon'+ret'tara, �vl�►c-.nc, t r i t t i 1`R1, -_V . X MO. �eFFd'1 :'!.'i f nil" !!it h•.t * ! U -M iR + 1"IC r' ~ 0 R I G I N AL gleati,on =dyer any otter c4.=umetances . any court ac�y:.::, `�;» ,?=wyra{i i Party 11hol ba ant�tled tC remover ov,,C 1 party` S reasurable attorney$' tee* rind ooscm . IN WMTN SS w9PRUC Y, th4m parties haer6to aet, =heir hurula A :: sells t:he day and year firaet Above ,mitten. 37 r_. _. r -nn' Yitlrx•i va vhQ BA!;Ard I.VLJly� 1+ VP i��+ni'a7 / Y A. Otiase 7r ah4 ftrie 7- Wiest The f ort�ga irag 3 a�C: u r.t rata« j6C rm0W ledgpd before m�! this nc^�` -. Alam, Vert+ 'Aa Chsi'!^+.Smn if the ?035 `S:r' 4 r?1F3 2'it.4LitiMO,Ak 1L-110iti'iw]1"rA Azacclar.i.'.n. ^.mmim"iutt emxPixssc Notary Public SMATE-. n Iris. Co*JNTY aF no i ,r 1� y The foregTiTiS inetrument Wa a *cXncw:Ltdged !Deivrt *.n03 this Iffy 3Lr39r., by Wtlii&m �.+mR �rsr! tA�ri�r z'. Wide. 14 ! SVT.: Iii -RT 1 Nov m WITNU,53 my hand and off 14Y co,=4-mrsioa expires. TOTAL, P-06 P.O.:BOX 1210 BRSaltt CO 81621 Subject. OWS Installation Observati Pitkin County, Colorado JOb NO. 8052 1 cQPY taxed to; V311-tkiA CCAMty HOalth Department, ATTUO Nancy MacKenzie 12-09-096 12:i4PM FROM F-0. CHURCH-MERRITT HOUSE TO 1000 E;ALLON 2 COMPART111ENT TAINK W/PUJA-- IN SECTION LI ET 3 Joe A so S TOTALS Lll,-E-kL FEET. 36®® ga.AK FEET, 72109 NWTH VALVE BW FCR "."IMS 1. 2 AND 3, EC. l!ZOUTH VALVE BOX FCR rECT!CN 4 AND S. �a TOTAL P.03 EOC I EA CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS July 28, 1997 TODD HABERMANN CONSTRUCTION P.O. BOX 1210 BASALT, CO 81621 Subject—. Drip Irrigation Onsite Wastewater Soil Moisture Testing 0169 North Starwood Drive Lot 14R, Starwood Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6720 Dear Mr. Habermann, f.Op � i,, `'r: r�:� � �1jjr `� r_;.•fir �.1': 19 S's'Ln�•t We have visited the lot several times in May 7; dune 11 and 16; and July 18, 1997 to observe the drip irrigation field, and to obtain the soil moisture samples as required by the Pitkin County OWS permit. The results are moisture testing is attached. The results of observa- tions indicate the OWS is operating adequately. At the May, 1997 visit, there was water leaking from the collector ditch which flowed onto the drip irrigation field. There had been settlement of soil at several distribution lines. Remedial measures were discussed and have been implemented. Rocks larger than 6 inches were removed and low areas were filled. Four samples were obtained from the drip irrigation field area. The results of the soil moisture testing and saturation of the soil is presented on TABLE I. If there are any questions, please call. i E. 0. CHURCH,, INC;16';x, Edward 0. Churcix,., P. E. R t; 3 copies sent,ti r{{. cc: Pitkin County Environmental health, ATTN: Nancy MacKenzie 925 East 17th Avenue - Denver, Colorado 80218.1407 P.O. Box 2869 Q Evergreen, Colorado 80437-2869 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 TABLE I - SOILS M01S.&AIRE TESTING RESULTS JU1Y 18 1997 r I TRENCH 5A @ 3` CLAY 2 TRENCH 8A @ ° ORGANIC 3 TRENCH 24A @ 80' 45 4 TRENCH 8B @ 41 ORGANIC CLAY 99 19.0 72 74 37.4 " 98 0.4 ?5 78 19@4 45 sa fron, bottomand y. _„ is from end of lines in Ceet. Pump Selection for a Non -Pre. )rized System -Single Family Resid ;e Project 269 N. Starwood / 1994 system Parameters 0.2 feet Loss in Transport 0.4 160 Discharge Assembly Size 2.00 inches Transport Length 200 feet Transport Pipe Class 40 feet Transport Line Size 2.00 inches Distributing Valve Model None 140 Max Elevation Lift 20 feet Design Flow Rate 10 gpm Flow Meter None inches 'Add -0n' Friction Losses 0 feet 120 Calculations Transport Velocity 0.9 fps Frictional Head Losses Loss through Discharge 0.2 feet Loss in Transport 0.4 feet Loss through Valve 0.0 feet Loss through Flowmeter 0.0 feet 'Add-on' Friction Losses 0.0 feet Pipe Volumes Vol of Transport Line 34.9 gals Minimum Pump Requirements Design Flow Rate 10.0 gpm Total Dynamic Head 20.6 feet Orenco Systems' Incorporated Changing the Way the Wald Dm Whoruvner' 12 40 20 0` 0 Pump Data 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Net Discharge (gpm) PF5005 High Head Effluent Pump 50 GPM, 1/2HP 115/230 V 10 60H z, 2 00/ 23 OV 3 0 60 Hz PF5007 High Head Effluent Pump 50 GPM, 3/4HP 230V 10 60Hz, 200/230/460V 30 60Hz PF5010 High Head Effluent Pump 50 GPM, 1HP 230V 10 60Hz, 200/460V 30 60Hz PF5015 High Head Effluent Pump 50 GPM, 1-1/2HP 230V 10 60Hz, 200V 30 60Hz LU(J. Ir11U System Curve:. Pump Curve: Pump Optimal Range Operating Pointo Design Pointo Pump Selection for a Non -Pre- rized System -Single Family Resid a Project 269 N. Starwood / 1996 system Parameters 0.2 feet Loss in Transport 0.4 160 Discharge Assembly Size 2.00 inches Transport Length 200 feet Transport Pipe Class 40 feet Transport Line Size 2.00 inches Distributing Valve Model None 140 Max Elevation Lift 20 feet Design Flow Rate 10 gpm Flow Meter None inches 'Add -0n' Friction Losses 0 feet 120 Calculations Transport Velocity 0.9 fps Frictional Head Losses Loss through Discharge 0.2 feet Loss in Transport 0.4 feet Loss through Valve 0.0 feet Loss through Flowmeter 0.0 feet 'Add-on' Friction Losses 0.0 feet Pipe Volumes Vol of Transport Line 34.9 gals Minimum Pump Requirements Design Flow Rate 10.0 gpm Total Dynamic Head 20.6 feet Orenco Systems' Incorporated Changing the Way the World Dou Wartewate 12 40 20 I Pump Data 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Net Discharge (gpm) PF5005 High Head Effluent Pump 50 GPM, 1/2HP 115/230V 10 60H z, 2 00/ 23 OV 3 0 60 Hz_ PF5007 High Head Effluent Pump 50 GPM, 3/4HP 230V 10 60Hz, 200/230/460V 30 60Hz PF5010 High Head Effluent Pump 50 GPM, 1HP 230V 10 60Hz, 200/460V 30 60Hz PF5015 High Head Effluent Pump 50 GPM, 1-1/2HP 230V 10 60Hz, 200V 30 60Hz System Curve:. Pump Curve:, - Pump Pump Optimal Ranger Operating Pointo Design Pointo R! i i I ..ter ' 0 0 ! \ 0 7 -7-� i"T WPI "FI m L It A: if p cc CC) f t 140 t A If E)Q57r)5 6)000�5 OF OAK — — - _ _ / 1 i / / / Byl L\DA E J. JUD /S C AL ROM L n OAK5 L 'TA AR� wi J4 EMR T A /00, AREA E EvA Tel i ao ai L EAS -TO affvAWN 1049LO, 'o ON AR,54. DRY6T A Ole V �14 .00e :''CARS loo, 1 , / I \ /- \ PAW* 1000, 3 CAR ;ApAgE, EX6Tr scp t/1 .0001, 1000, EL TERRACE .01*10 1000, It A '00I 114C.07' I r , 1 I( j r � \, / / / /001-101/ A", 4, 7' I If X", 7i. .: Ole 7' —7 61, -------- 200 Y 7 woob FE"CE ......... -_4 7 731,9' 10UND REBAR itx� W/ PLA CAP 779 20151 NOTES - COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW ARCHITECTS LTD 510 EAST HYMAN ASPEN, CO. 81611 P 303 925-2867 F 303 925-3736 - P.O.BOX 3507, 107 NORTH FIR ST. - TELLURIDE, CO. 81435 - P 303 728-3037 F 03 728-3236 r-1 I WISE RESIDENCE LOT R-14 STARWOOD, PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO W � S - 2F- . VSE ISSUE: 72/ L15114 REVISIONS:,