The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.eh.264326201010 (1999) (CDU)r: Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department Permit for an Individual Sewage Disposal System 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-5074 Permit # 99088 Parcel ID # ti643-262-01-010 Type of permit Name of Owner New(x ) Repair( ) Addition to House( ) William and Marie Wise Street Address 269 N. Starwood Drive r1h �A Property legal description Tract R-14, Starwood Subdivision Size of lot Total square footage of the house Water source Starwood Water District # of bedrooms in house # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house Caretaker unit yes Total square footage of the caretaker unit 688 square feet of living area # of bedrooms in caretaker unit 1 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in caretaker unit 0 Designed for what # rooms (list) 2 Permit information Designed by Church and Associates Mailing Address 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Perc rate 33 Profile hole depth 8 ft Depth to groundwater or bedrock Septic tank capacity 1000 gallons Absorption area 1560 square feet Comments unknown Septic permit approved per compliance with the engineer design and specifications dated September 3,1999. Any changes must be approved by this department and the design engineer prior to them being made. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the Pitkin County ISDS regulations. This department does not endorse any brand of products. This system will consist of a 1,000 gallon, two-compartment tank and a 620 square foot absorption area with a trench design. Each trench will be 3 ft x 62.5 ft, with a total of 40 chamber units. The wastewater pipe must be encased for at least 10 feet on each side of where it crosses the potable drinking water line. Permit approved by: Date: t �1 C� Plans and specifications of the proposed individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Installer: Final inspection approval: /44LC Date: /,0 ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEP&RTMENT APPLICATIr FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPO: SYSTEM 1 j0 S. Galena St., Aspen Colorado 8161 Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970-920-5039 Name of OWNER W e- F W s p Owner's Mailing Address SA I's Ll 2101 ST Fi M r4.51-' 0 n T ti '7 0 O a Business Phone: `'-] 1 3 - t./ a0 - (n )_I Home Phone: 9 *0 - a. a \ \ Primary Contact Person (ail communication regarding this permit will go through this person) Name Company A r Contact Mailing Address Q Business Phone:") -) - 3 3 t Cell Phone : t - 3 1 Fax: 3 Parcel ID # (available from assessor's office at 920-5160 or at www.aspen.com/assessor/) Street address of property a 0. -C w am Q r N v e_ n Legal Description: Lot (�,- 1 t ,Block Filing Subdivision S jg„n N.V ppc�( Size of lot: acres. Type of proposed structure: Size of bldg. envelope: Total square feet of house # of bedrooms in house' # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house o oV Caretaker Unit: Attached ) Detached( X ) Total area(sq. ft.) of caretaker unit G 8 g L ; veal I y- # of bedrooms in caretaker unit 1 # of offices, lofts and similar size rooms of caretaker unit a Permit is for: New Home (:a ) Repair due to failure ( ) Remodel/Addition ( ) Emergency use ( ) Water: Private well ( ) Spring ( ) Stream ( )1n1 Community/Public Water System (X) If community system: Name of system S`I' o r w p o a V a1 e- r p t '5+ r 1 G;" The fee for a ISDS application is $330 for a permit that takes 6 hours or less for the department to approve. If approval takes longer than 6 hours, a rate of $55 per hour will be charged. The maximum fee is 51000. The basic fee of $330 is due at the time of application. The remainder, if any, will be due in two stages: first, at the time of issuance of the ISDS permit: second, before final approval of the ISDS permit. Application for an individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accurate information on locations of all existing and proposed wells, contour intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes, waterlines, springs, suction or irrigation lines. drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, floodplains, dry gulches, and existing septic systems. I hereby certify that any such features not shown on attached site map are not present. Issuance of the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may be undertaken until all approvals and permits have been obtained. The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department, Pitkin County and employees of these agencies will be held harmless should the individual sewage disposal system fail or malfunction. The permit to construct is issued on information submitted by the applicant or his/her representatives. The owner assumes full responsibility in case of failure of the system. Signature of applicant ° Date Received by �(�j,'Z ( �� !r �� Receipt # ��— Date �Gl Aspen / Pitkin Environmental Health Dep ent Contact Log Sheet 819ITZ511111 fez rim wR1i [N�� ,rim■ �� I i ►nn®---/ 17---3 - i i k Tom Dunlo , 01:53 PM 10/12. eiss caretaker X -Sender: tomd@comdev.ci.aspen.co.us ate: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 13:53:12 -0600 To: nancym@ci.aspen.co.us From: Tom Dunlop <tomd@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Weiss caretaker 4 nancy, Pat from Habermann construction wanted a profile pit inspection on Tues 10/12. 1 could not make it up to the lot, Starwood lot R14, 269 Starwood Drive to see the pit. I asked Pat to have the engineer log the hole and tell us: depth of hole, presence or absence of ground water and bedrock, soil types as the hole deepens, and any evidence of soil staining. FYI, TSD Thomas S. Dunlop, Director Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Dept. 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colo 81611 (970) 920-5073 tomd@ci.aspen.co.us Printed for nancy mackenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> 1 FA STARWOOD MATER DISTRICT 0 121 Stewart drive Aspen, Colorado 81611 September 10, 1999 Ms. Betsey Kipp Pitkin Co. Envirornnental Health Officer 130 South Galena Street Aspen. CO 81611 RE: William Wise - Caretaker Unit Starwood Subdivision Dear Betsey, Please accept this letter as verification that the Starwood Water District will supply water to the Wise caretaker unit, Tract R-14, 0269 N. Starwood Drive. Starwood Subdivision. If you have any questions. please call me at 925-8939. Sincerely. Julia Johnston, Secretary Starwood Homeowners Association Ciartiwnnd Westar nictrirt cc: William Wise Y Oct 22 99 09:06a E ^ CHURCH 30''4639321 p.1 TIE:?o-�Z i -RACT N CAL- w6poseD. CHURCH & Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS /5-2a-99 W1S� I�Es y�E��CL -DFfye'D SAN 1 . '73, I"��t 1s A v \ Rz 1A- Amb OWS "hoz N4W CARE"i RtER WJ 1T iM -z- �jEat-OG1CpFL tNGirrE� R r ASN a �A�LR ON1 DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 ATTENTION This Individual Sewage Disposal System is considered a DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM For information regarding the Moisture Reports, please refer to the Drip Irrigation file under W for water, then ISDS. Thank you! M4,164 �za� A 40 CHURCH Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS December 2, 1999 Todd Haberman Construction Attn: Pat P.O. Box 1210 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Subject: Installation Observations, Proposed Wise Caretaker Unit Lot R-14, Starwood Village Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 8052 Gentlemen: As requested, we observed the installation of the onsite wastewater system (OWS) for the subject site on November 17 and 30, 1999. The system was designed under our Job No. 8052, dated October 14, 1999. The system includes the installation of a 1000 -gallon, two compartment, pre -cast concrete septic tank with an effluent filter on the outlet and four chamber trenches, each with 1 row of 10 chambers, for a total area of 620 square feet (SF). An as -built drawing is included as Figure 1. The components of the OWS were installed in conformance with the plans and specifications. If there are a6y 'questions or if we can be of further service, please call. Sincerely, I EOC/trpr 2 copies sent copy to Aspen Pitkin Environmental Health Department DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 303.463.9317' Fax: 303.463.9321 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 ................ In Q C m m n ml�zo m zg0 1 0 0 3)MZ c m 4 CA AMW M 13 ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS Owner's Named ;: Parcel ID #F:$ House Size (sq. ft)?(# (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 75 Number of Bedrooms in Main House Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow 300 State Review Required? no Perc Rate Design Flow (Q) = # potential bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 525 Absorptior Area (A= (1.75Q/r) A = 1458 sq. ft of absorption area required infiltrator units without reduction A maximum 30% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system, only if the lot size and soil conditions are optimal. If a reduction is being proposed, describe why lot size and soil conditions are optimal: A = sq.ft with reduction infiltrator units with reduction Type of system: []Absorption trenches []Absorption bed [] Gravelless chambers []Dry well []Seepage Pit [X]Other (Drip Irrigation) Minimum tank capacity 656 gallons SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 100 SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet = 50 SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = 25 FINAL INSPECTION BY: DATE: House Size (sq. ft.) 6$8 (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 75 Number of Bedrooms in Main House Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow 300 State Review Required? no Perc Rate 3,' (T) Design Flow (Q) _ # potential bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 525 Absorption Area (=Q/5 X SQRT perc rate) A = 603.17908 sq. ft. of absorption area required 39 gravelless chamber units without reduction # of Perc Holes Required: 3 1 in every soil type? Spaced uniformly over proposed area? A maximum 30% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system, only if the lot size and soil conditions are optimal. If a reduction is being proposed, describe why lot size and soil conditions are optimal: A = 422.22535 sq.ft. with reduction 27 gravelless chamber units with reduction Type of system: []Absorption trenches []Absorption bed [] Gravelless chambers []Dry well []Seepage Pit []Other (type) Minimum tank capacity 656.25 gallons SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 100 SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet = 50 SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = 25 Printed on Recycled Paper t '-1/ CHURCH February 14, 2000 Todd Haberman Construction PO Box 1210 Basalt, CO 81621 �c�3 -a(oCb(0 Associates, ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Subject: Drip Irrigation Onsite Wastewater System - Soil Moisture Testing Lot R-14, Starwood Village Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 8052 Gentlemen: We visited the subject site on September 22, 1999 to obtain the soil moisture samples as required by the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department OWS permit. The results of observations indicate the OWS is operating adequately. Observation of the drain field during our visit indicated no surfacing of effluent nor condition that would suggest the system is not functioning properly. The results of the moisture testing is attached If there are any questions, please call. Sincerely, CHURCH & Associ �0r_21 Edward O. Church, 3 copies sent EOCltrp 0.111.E C).* •4p 0 C' G qo 172 : o Qom; •. ,: �SS�ONAL�� cc: APEHD, Attn: Nancy MacKenzie DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 GA51 Lt HUUK 3U3.00UAJD0 EVERGREEN 303.616.1455 fir. `7 TABLE I - SOIL MOISTURE TESTING RESULTS DRIP IRRIGATION ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM SAMPLE LOCATION* NOVEMBER, 1996 1 TRENCH 12 @ 18' 2 TRENCH 12 @ 30' 3 TRENCII 6 @ 50' 4 TRENCH 10 @ 15' JUNE 19, 1997 1 TRENCH 7 @ 18' 2 TRENCH 7 @ 100' 3 TRENCH 14 @ 70' 4 TRENCH 17 @ 50' MAY 28,1998 1 TRENCH 22 (q) 90' 2 TRENCH 1.2 L 50' 3 TRENCH 10 @ 10' 4 TRENCH 5 @ 70' SEPTEMBER 22, 1999 1 SW CORNER 2 NW CORNER 3 NE CORNER 4 SE CORNER SOIL DRY DENSITY TYPE PCF TOPSOIL 33 ORG CLAY 42 ORG CLAY 66 ORG CLAY 60 MOISTURE CONTENT,% 57.3 64.2 34.7 41.8 % SATURATION 38 70 59 62 ORG CLAY 99 19.0 82 ORG CLAY 74 37.4 78 ORG CLAY 98 20.4 75 ORG CLAY 78 19.4 45 CLAY 98** 24.5 91 CLAY, SANDY 98** 16.9 63 CLAY 98** 17.4 65 CLAY, SANDY 98** 20.3 75 CLAY 93 21.6 71 CLAY 103 20.1 87 CLAY 97 21.0 77 CLAY, SANDY 78 29.1 97 ** Density based on the maximum prior density which determines maximum saturation * Trenches numbered from bottom and distance is from manifold in feet. JOB NO. 8052 CHURCH • Associates, Inc. October 14, 1999 Todd Haberman Construction ATTN: Pat P.O. Box 1210 Basalt, CO 81621 ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Subject: Subsurface Investigation for OWS, Proposed Wise Caretaker Unit Lot R-14, Starwood Village Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 8052 Gentlemen: As requested, we observed the profile pit for the caretaker drain field for the subject property. We performed percolation tests as a part of a subsurface investigation on August 18, 1999, and observation of the profile pit on October 10, 1999. This is to complete subsurface information for an ISDS Permit for the Caretaker Unit per our OWS design dated September 3, 1999. Subsurface conditions encountered in the test pit consist of 6 inches of root zone material/topsoil, underlain by stiff, moist, sandy clay to 7.5 feet, underlain by very stiff sandy clay to the maximum depth explored of 8 feet. No groundwater or bedrock was encountered. The `Log of Profile Pit' is presented as Figure 1. The location of the profile pit is presented on Figure 2. All other recommendations from our original report dated September 3, 1999, should be followed. If there are any questions or if we can be of further service, please call. CHURCH & Edward O. Church, EOC/trp :j 2 copies sent DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 it I ki 10 15 20 25 30 EXPLANATIONS: ® ROOT ZONE CLAY, SANDY, WITH POCKETS OF GRAVEL, STIFF, MOIST, BROWN/DARK BROWN JOB NO. 8052 IN 1 15 CLAY, SANDY, VERY STIFF, MOIST, DARK BROWN LOG OF PROFILE -PIT FIGURE 1 LOT l 4, STARW ')D VILLAGE PITKI COUNTY, COLORADO 160 LOCATION OF TEST PIT JOB NO. 8052 FIGURE 2 PROFILER TABLE 1 - PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS Lot R-14, STARWOOD VILLAGE DATE OF TEST: 8-18-99 Pitkin County, Colorado 1 23 30 12.75 13.75 AVG. INTERVAL DEPTH TIME DEPTH DEPTH HOLE HOLE CHANGE, PERC. OF HOLE, INTERVAL, START, END, PERC. NUMBER (INCHES) (MINUTES) (INCHES) (INCHES) {INCHES) RATE RATE, (MPI) 0.50 60 (MPI) 1 23 30 12.75 13.75 1.00 30 1.25 30 13.75 14.50 0.75 40 30 11.25 30 14.50 15.00 0.50 60 30 15.00 15.50 0.50 60 60 2 21 30 10.00 11.25 1.25 24 1.00 10 30 11.25 12.25 1.00 30 10 13.25 14.25 30 12.25 13.25 1.00 30 30 13.25 14.25 1.00 30 30 3 19 10 16.50 17.50 1.00 10 10 17.50 18.50 1.00 10 10 12.00 13.25 1.25 8 10 13.25 14.25 1.00 10 10 NUMBER OF HOLES: 3 AVG PERCOLATION RATE (MPI): 33 Remarks: Holes presoaked 8 hours prior to data collection Job No. 8025 CHURCH & Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS September 3, 1999 Todd Haberman Construction ATTN: Pat P.O. Box 1210 Basalt, CO 81621 Subject: Onsite Wastewater System Design, Proposed Wise Caretaker Unit Lot R-14, Starwood Village Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 8052 Gentlemen: As requested, we have prepared an onsite wastewater system design for the subject property. We perform- ed percolation tests on August 18, 1999. We understand the owner would like to have another "drip - irrigation" OWS for the Caretaker Unit. The percolation tests would allow a standard system. We have designed a drip -irrigation system and the backup system is a standard chamber trench system. SITE CONDITIONS - The site is approximately 4 -acre lot located in a rural area of Pitkin County, Colorado. The locations of the proposed caretaker unit and percolation holes are presented on Figure 1. The slope at the proposed field area is 15% to the north. The ground surface has a moderate cover of native grasses and wildflowers. The slope at the drain field area is north facing. The proposed drain field site is not in a confined drainage area and has moderate solar and wind exposure. We believe the site is suitable for use of a drip irrigation or evapotranspiration -absorption (ETA) OWS. There is an existing drip irrigation OWS the main residence, indicated on Figure 1. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - A single -bedroom caretaker unit, which has less than 2000 SF of living area is proposed. We are required to size detached structures on a minimum of 2 bedrooms. The minimum sizing criteria sewage loading for a two-bedroom dwelling with less than 2000 SF is 150 gallons per day (GPD) based on two people per bedroom and 75 gallons per day per person is 300 GPD. The sewage loading with a 1.75 peaking factor is 525 GPD. The design loading includes a garbage grinder, dish washer and washing machine. Discharge from a water softener, spa or pool should not be directed to the OWS. The residence will be served water by the local water district. EXPERIMENTAL DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM - The proposed drip irriptiQn (shallow trench) OWS has been author as an experimental OWS in Pitkin County. As a--pari—of the authorization, there are conditions, which are no f other permits in Pitkin County. The conditions include: A. the appli- cant must commit follow`"recommendawn"f..Lhe_Department and the design engineer, B. a backup syste design is required, C. monitoring of soil saturatto annual report is required and must be reported for 5 years, D. the site must be reviewed for solar and wind ex to wind, E. the Department DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 OWS Design, Caretaker Job No. 8025 Page 2 will allow design without a 1.75 peaking factor, although we have included the 1.75 factor in this design. You will have to agree to the following conditions: 1. you must agree to the terms of the permit; 2. a backup design' -is a ETA bed design in the same area; 3. monitoring as described later in this letter will be required which will include an annual report as described in Item C; and 4. the site has been reviewed as described under Site Conditions and found suitable for installation of a drip irrigation OWS. Eight shallow trench drip irrigation systems have been installed a d -v performing properly in Pitkin County, so we do not anticipate any problems with installation or performance of the OWS; There are 3500 successful drip irrigation OW-Verforming in Colorado. No "bond" is required as was at the.. ' allation of the main residende system. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - A percolation test was performed by our firm on August 18, 1999. Percolation holes at depths of 19 inches to 23 inches indicated percolation rates ranging from 10 to 60 minutes per inch (MPI). We recommend designing the OWS based on the average percolation rate of 33 MPI, or an application rate of 0.36 GAUSF/DAY. A test pit will have to be excavated prior to Pitkin County personnel going to the site for their site visit. RECOMMENDATIONS - We recommend the installation of shallow trench drip irrigation OWS as indi- cated on Figure 1. The OWS includes septic tanks and dosed shallow trench drain field. The OWS is designed on an application rate of 0.36 GAUSF/DAY and an average sewage loading o!525 GPD. The application rate utilizes slow soil absorption. We recommend the installation of one 1000 -gallon single -compartment concrete septic tank with a pump in a biotube vault. The drain field will include the installation of 1560 SF of drip -irrigation field in three sections as presented on Figures 1 and 2. The field should be installed in three 520 SF sections. The drip irrigation field configuration can be modified to fit the topography with approval of our office. The trenches should be backfilled to re-establish th-e,Qriginal slope. We recommend the surface of the dripn or gravelless trenches be seeded after installation of the system. We recommend a native seed'mix from the area available at seed stores be used. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop -_'a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed over the field. ti An alternative gravelless chamber trench OWS is presented in Figures through 5. The alternate installation would include one 1000 -gallon two-compartment, concrete septic tank with an effluent filter at the outlet. A distribution box should be installed similar to Figure 5. We recommend the installation of four gravelless tenches with infiltrators, each trench 3 feet (1 chambers) x 62.5 feet (10 chambers), for a total area of 620 SF. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE - The owner must realize an OWS is different from public sewer service. The owner must assume responsibility for maintenance of the system. The system is relatively maintenance free, but the owner must have the septic tanks pumped and filters cleaned (hosed off). We recommend the tank be pumped and filter cleaned every two years. There are daily considerations, such as not putting plastic or other non -biodegradable material into the system. Water use must be monitored so toilets are not allowed to run when seals malfunction. To illustrate the point, a running toilet will consume in excess of 1000 gallons per day if allowed to flow. An excess 1000 GPD loading could flood and irreparably harm the field. OWS Design, Caretaker Job No. 8025 Page 3 We caution against installation of a water softener. The hydraulic loading from the backwash of a water softener can be detrimental to OWS and a separate dry -well should be constructed for the backwash waste, if a water softener is installed. No landscaping or plastic can be used over the field, which will reduce evapotranspiration from the field. Chemically treated water from a swimming pool or spas should not be introduced into the OWS. As a part of the experimental permit, there are conditions imposed by the APEHD. The differences from other installations are the requirements for monitoring of the installation of the drip -irrigation system. These may be required because of a prior experience in Pitkin County with experimental systems. Drip -irrigation systems have been installed in Pitkin County and there have not been problems with the installation. We anticipate the annual reporting requirement for five years and is estimated to cost $175.00 per year. LIMITATIONS - A drip irrigation design requires installation by a contractor who is an experienced installer. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted, If subsurface conditions different from those described are encountered, we should evaluate the effect of the changes on the proposed OWS. If the health department makes modifications to this design, we should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the performance of our OWS design. All construction is to be in accordance with the ISDS regulations. Pipe type and size, burial requirements, septic tank construction, and other specifications, which are not depicted in our report, are to conform to the ISDS regulations. The installer of the system is to have demonstrated knowledge of the ISDS regulations and requirements. Additional observations are not included in the cost of this design. If there are any questions or if we can be of further service, please call. CHURCH & Edward O EOC/trp Appendix A: Experimental Drip Imgation Information 3 copies sent 111111 P HIS 1111111111111111111111111111111"11 42x403 11/1998 01:13P RESDIUTI DAVIS _11 1 of 2 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUN1 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITIQN COUNTY, COLORADO, GRANTING APPROVAL TO THE WILLIAM AND MARIE WISE DETACHED CARETAKER DWELLING UNIT Resolution No. 98-A.1p I. William and Marie Wise ("applicants' have applied to the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC") for approval of a detached caretaker dwelling unit. =. The property is located t 0269 North Starwood Drive and is described as Lot R-14, Starwood. The Applicants propose to deed restrict the proposed caretaker dwelling unit pursuant to Section 3- 150.130(B), Caretaker Dwelling Units, and Section 3-210.10, Special Review, of the Pitkin County Land Use Code ("Code's. 4. The BOCC heard this application at its regularly scheduled meeting on November 18. 1998, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to the application. 5. The BOCC has determined that the detached caretaker dwelling unit meets the standards established in Section 3-150-130 of the Land Use Code. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners that it does hereby grants approval for a detached caretaker dwelling unit, subject to the following wnditions which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: The Applicants shall adhere to all material representations made in the application and public meetings. 2. Prior to application for a building permit, the caretaker dwelling unit deed restriction shall be recorded with the Housing Office. 7 Housing Office staff shall inspect the unit prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 4. The kitchen unit shall contain at least a two -burner stove with oven, a standard sink, and no less than a 6 cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer. 5. A letter of intent from the community water district to service the proposed unit shall be submitted prior to application of a building. 6. A septic permit shall be obtained from the Environmental Health Department prior to application of a building permit. 7. Landscaping and revegetation on the property shall utilize low water (xeriscaping) native plant (_ materials and concepts. The timing of any sprinkler systems shall be decreased for low water plants. ,� I illllf 11111111111 III illllli Illli�llll III 1111131 1111 Rkesoiutibn No. 98-o+W 425403 12/11/1998 81:13P R' iLUTI DAVIS SILVI P=e 2 2 of 2 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.0%- ?ITKIN COUNTY CO 8_ Prior to application for a building permit, the applicant shall submit a Fugitive Dust Plan to the Environmental Health Department. The plan shall include measures to ensure that dust does not become a nuisance and travel onto adjacent properties. 9. A fireplace/woodstove application must be filed and approved by the Environmental Health Department prior to the application of a building permit. 10. The Applicants shall obtain final approval from the Starwood Homeowners Association prior to application of a building permits. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIlVIES ON THE 1717H DAY OF OC C-1 OBER, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER,1998. vesrtp ,flQert n/orMt ?V,&;J.�t.D iN we Aflew 77,wer P w ,lea a wAftd /X, 1,034P-, AT EST: Dezuty CIerk and Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jona Elv, County ttorney Case 'P131-98 PID #2643-262-01-010 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Dorothea Farris, Chair Date. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: CFO Cindy Hou en, Community Development Director MEMORANDUM To: Tamara Pregl, Community Development Department From: Nancy MacKenzie, Environmental Health Department Date: November 9,1998 Re: Wise Caretaker Dwelling Unit Parcel ID # 2643-262-01-010 The Aspen/ Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the details of the Wise application under the authority of the Pitkin County Land Use Code and has the following comments. ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-17 and 3-1104: "It is the policy of the County to insure the availability of a water supply of adequate quality, quantity, pressure and dependability for fire protection and support of a proposed land use prior to approval of the use. The County shall require land uses to hook up to existing public systems if service is available." The applicant is served by the Starwood Water District and needs to provided a "...letter of intent to service the expanded use..." as defined in the Pitkin County Code. We recommend low water landscaping (xeriscaping), with the timing of any sprinkler systems decreased for low water plants. Contact the Colorado State University Cooperative Extension office or Denver Water Board for more information on xeriscaping. The County cannot issue septic and building permits until the applicant provides a letter of intent from the Starwood Water District to serve this expansion of service. SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-18 and 3-1105: "It is the policy of the Countv to ensure that adequate sewage treatment facilities are available to serve existing and new developments. Public and private sewage disposal systems and connections to such systems shall comply with the sewage disposal guidelines of Pitkin County's Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulation." Lots in the Starwood area have individual septic systems The existing house has a system designed for the 4 bedrooms in the main house and is not designed to serve additional use. The caretaker unit will need a sewage disposal system. No data has been submitted with this application to indicate that there is a suitable area for an additional sewage disposal system for the proposed caretaker unit. Printed — Re y,kd P.1— 1 o p of This particular lot appears to have difficult soil condition for conventional sewage disposal systems. The initial septic system for the main house was install in December of 1995. The system r was designed based on an average percolation rate of 53 mpi, a relatively slow rate. This system failed and had to be replace in a different location. The failure of the first system has not been determined. There were several factors that could have contributed to its failure. 1) Heavy truck traffic over the area of the absorption field before &/or after installation 2) Recontouring of adjacent land which caused runoff to flow onto the absorption field. 3) Poor soils with a very slow percolation rate. The failed absorption field was abandoned and an engineered replacement absorption field was relocated north of the house in 1996. The percolation rate in this area was even slower, an average of 90 mpi. Because of the slow percolation rate of the soil, the engineering firm of E.O. Church designed an 'experimental' Drip Irrigation system. This system was one of the eight Experimental Drip Irrigation systems allowed as an experiment in our county. This system was not designed to include the proposed detached caretaker unit. Because of the soil conditions on this lot and other constraints, it is possible that even though the applicant receives permission to build a detached caretaker unit, there might not be a suitable site to construct an additional ISDS for this expanded use. The applicant should contact an engineer registered in the State of Colorado who is knowledgeable in ISDS design to evaluate this application and to determine if an additional ISDS for the caretaker unit can be designed for the detached caretaker unit. All such systems installed within Pitkin County require septic permits issued by the Environmental Health Department, and must comply with the County's septic regulations. Owners should realize that the engineer must perform the soils tests between April 15 and Nov. 15 of each year. The County cannot issue building and septic permits without these soils tests. To receive a septic permit, the applicant will need to submit a septic permit application through a Registered Professional Engineer who will design the system. The packet must include several items, including percolation test results and profile hole information. It must also include a site plan with pertinent physical features. A floor plan for the dwelling and caretaker unit and a copy of the County's land use approval are needed as well. Once we receive the completed application, this Department will analyze and review the proposed septic design. It may take some time to have soils tests performed and additional time to have the system designed. The department can evaluate the site and soils tests only between April 15 and Nov. The owner should carefully evaluate this schedule to make sure all steps have been taken to make the permitting process as fast as possible. The type of soil will determine how large the septic system must be. The owners will need to obtain site specific soil data. The leach field should be in an area of no traffic, the owner should plant the field area with dry land grass, and residents should not water the leachfield area. It is desirable to locate the system Pnntcd on R- ycW P.per 2 %W *-40 below the house so that the system can operate by gravity. The applicant should refer to the Pitkin County Sewage Regulations for detailed information, or call our office to discuss this site. The site will pose some difficulty in placing the system away from hazards. One difficulty is that the ditch on-site poses a problem. Water drainage from the ditch was impairing the functioning of the replacement 'Drip Irrigation' design installed in 1997. The engineer was aware of this problem and was to have it corrected. Percolation test holes should be below the ditch in the area of the proposed leach field. If water from the ditch collects in these holes, the design will have to keep water from the ditch away from the leach field. These measures include culverting the ditch or creating diversion swales to move the water away from the septic system. The system must be at least fifty feet away from the ditch, with additional distance required for larger house. The engineer must do percolation tests during the time of high runoff in the area of the proposed leach field. Measures to mitigate water drainage include culverting or creating diversion swales to move the water away from the septic system. The Pitkin County Land Use Code prohibits soil absorption systems in areas where the ground slope is in excess of thirty percent (30%). A condition of approval for this application is the receipt and approval of the septic permit before issuance of a building permit. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Sections 2-14 and 3-705 and 3-710: "It is the policy of the County to preserve and protect its present water resources. To this end it is the policy of the County that no land use be initiated which would adversely affect the quantity, quality, or accessibility of the County's water resources; or which would occur at the expense of established water -dependent agricultural activities; or which would result in increased salinization of water resources, loss of minimum stream flows, further destruction of wildlife habitat, or major expenditures to reacquire or redistribute major water resources. It is alsolhe policy of the County to maintain a natural vegetative buffer along its surface waters such that the surface and groundwaters of the area are not encroached upon by land uses or other human activities which could cause deterioration of water quality or impair the natural treatment processes provided by meadows and wetlands." The Environmental Health Department will be addressing water quality impacts on down stream water quality. This application should not impact down stream water quality if the setbacks between the septic system and physical features comply with the Pitkin County Sewage Regulations. The Environmental Health Department's mission is to preserve and protect the quality of Pitkin County's water resources. Since a large percentage of the population is dependent upon water from wells, elimination of groundwater pollution, and protection of aquifers and their drainage areas are of utmost importance. Roofs and asphalt areas can be nonpoint sources of water discharge that can contaminate water supplies. This Department recommends that nonpoint sources of discharge be retained on the property of origin. To accomplish this, the owner can use landscaping, drainage patterns, detention ponds, and/or dry wells for water runoff from buildings. Printed on R tiy,W Paper AIR UALITY: Sections 2-13 and 3-602_ "Only that development is permitted which will not contribute significantly to degradation of air quality in Pitkin County. Developments may not constitute an indirect or direct air pollution source under Federal, State or County regulations." This project should not contribute significantly to degradation of air quality in Pitkin County since it consists of only a single family home (with caretaker unit). FUGITIVE DUST Activities such as road building and landscaping require a Fugitive Dust Plan. The measures must prevent windblown dust from blowing off the property or creating a nuisance. This plan needs to include, but is not limited to, fencing, watering of haul roads and disturbed areas, daily cleaning of adjacent paved roads to remove mud carried out by trucks, speed limits, or other measures. A condition should be approval by the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department of the fugitive dust control plan, containing enough measures to ensure that dust does not become a nuisance or blow onto adjacent property. FIREPLACE Metropolitan areas of Pitkin County that includes this site may have two devices: either two gas log fireplaces, two certified clean -burning woodstoves, or one of each. Each building may also have unlimited numbers of decorative gas appliances. New homes may NOT have wood burning fireplaces, nor may any heating device use coal as fuel. The owners cannot install fireplaces or woodstoves in barns or agricultural buildings. A condition of approval for this application is the receipt and approval of the fireplace/woodstove permit by the Environmental Health Department. This is a condition of building permit issuance. CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS: Section 2-7: "it is the pt hc%, tit the County to ensure that no use or development of land is permitted which is in violation of the laws of the County, the State of Colorado, or the United States of America." This Department is not aware of any issues of concern regarding other environmental health laws. 4 Printed on Re ycled Paper z 0 OD 0 0 N To z ?� 0 o.P� C cn z -+ n G 0 0 00 v� o� rn \� \ �mOz YVY m - N m0000 orn< z>--1 0 zn Z -v6G� D �� z�� Ci =nmZz z n --mei r C m '11 z G C J m = �n D Wr 0 m < -� -p < C -D m D r Z 0 c - n C) C) z C nmo D A O DD• v -Ir M M r D �_� C) -D 00 �� m 0 0 DD n>o Z xc' �- O orcz)L n L O X0o w - O (n Co° In z CN11 I I r -i* z m (nD -mu cc--)) > < _ ^D0 � rn�D I r,i 07-00 D C)n�7 D x �m � m ter a �z0 c 'ix �� N D p �0-DI =i m \ r- o foo oz o o .... O raiz -p- w z n o m C) < ; -I v t)iA cN,i� r o� �7 -2 n � z m o � D -I b z O z cn cn - cn m O Z -uG > m0 c O m O r z m m m S P I .CGD X C) I'I � z N oOOZc Q o D y � -U D n >< zn orD-�Om � j Z m -c-0 °_ �X 0 ^n -° �mo m�o�0D_I m �_ m mac DmDmm 0 c,�rn z z��m N cn 1 MOM cn mn m �M>0 =m rnp� z �= D O C amn r- n� Nmm n 0 0�= rnK m :0 r0Om m ,�� -q n mm I Z� �' m U'- r -- c no >—O O n> �w2 10G)D G) D I D �tznC�)m p (n rn N r r'Ti D m w (n z n nD�C) D G) = �y O� o COM � m m �m p N D m -� co D m / ^ v, J ry\� W Cli T X a 0 mM�o0 � -� o-zi > c=ji0 m -= -u X z 0 r- --i D z z z -U D -u C7 D � -mi X�0 -u o mm r x �z Z� n m J Z I DI, n f Sz u O z0v 3 *m ro -qmu' z _z o rz- C 'T7 - x (n oo X m - I C: D 3 w zz Z0x 0 L" 00 -qo N v _° 131N1 m ;u m—.. Ar O AX m ZO Z0 O (n 0 / z z0\ C z -oc�tn.P6 00N _ -I m z n O - rr ZM-00 me ami -i o0 �' �mn �mr=*i0n cn A�� rzn os <� o <o W v 0 C) --1 ^ m o m rC o z zll v �_ vo -_I-9 0 x'rovm o P Z CD c mm c O -ate m zz D xmrn I G C) D x OO D r �z x xm co m n mm D O N -T1 Z n D m r_ zGo m o z CIS I m' , BUILDING SECTION CUT MATCH LiNE Aal SHEET N0. REFERENCE GRID LINE ROOM NUMBER LIVING WINDOW MARK Imo DOOR MARK m WALL TYPE MARK CONCRETE �. MATERIAL LEGEND SECTION PLAN SOIL/ COMPACTED FILL II�!-il_I� ROCK/ NON -COMPACTED FILL SAND FINISHED WOOD CONCRETE MASONRY STONE FRAME WALL H H TILE, GLAZING ! STEEL ALUMINUM OR SHEET METAL BATT INSULATION GYP. WALL BOARD/ STUCCO/ PLASTER PLYWOOD iY IX IYr, �. .GG IF Maui Mx,sf Hoa A,T 4Mm1e T ser wn EF' Mase. EC Dasa rw Axe aa. m m91en or 0.W auBeeg C/G LebMel 0. CaterlPn QR cr« CLR CW. QDE CIo.« RY Cmov,s waxy Wt fR Caen ca,c ca.v.le CQR CaaY1u DP D«Pm1re DET pws DA DwV INN IN D:we r IN Pm 06 Dasepau tam EA FM K OW V uNx cLeT lwug D lD(T 0R11P « Neel R c.NeT Me doges csPle9 ISD %r W C«nIX.a w r.o.awd M RM m lie,eapr Fp Moo A Mee Ove Afi FON Mae�eeUm OA Gage m•- [E ROUGH FRAMING OR DETAIL N0. -- SPOT ELEVATION �EL��uc m• DETAIL CUT I bIT T5 ELI EOY.. it6 -m• ROUGH SAWN TRIM SHEET NO_-, ^� WOOD BLOCKING DETAIL CUT Q.:MDRAWING REVISION ) slr,. GLU-LAM WOOD EXTERIOR ELEVATION A41 INTERIOR ELEVATION ROOM NUMBER LIVING WINDOW MARK Imo DOOR MARK m WALL TYPE MARK CONCRETE �. MATERIAL LEGEND SECTION PLAN SOIL/ COMPACTED FILL II�!-il_I� ROCK/ NON -COMPACTED FILL SAND FINISHED WOOD CONCRETE MASONRY STONE FRAME WALL H H TILE, GLAZING ! STEEL ALUMINUM OR SHEET METAL BATT INSULATION GYP. WALL BOARD/ STUCCO/ PLASTER PLYWOOD iY IX IYr, �. .GG IF Maui Mx,sf Hoa A,T 4Mm1e T ser wn EF' Mase. EC Dasa rw Axe aa. m m91en or 0.W auBeeg C/G LebMel 0. CaterlPn QR cr« CLR CW. QDE CIo.« RY Cmov,s waxy Wt fR Caen ca,c ca.v.le CQR CaaY1u DP D«Pm1re DET pws DA DwV INN IN D:we r IN Pm 06 Dasepau tam EA FM K OW V uNx cLeT lwug D lD(T 0R11P « Neel R c.NeT Me doges csPle9 ISD %r W C«nIX.a w r.o.awd M RM m lie,eapr Fp Moo A Mee Ove Afi FON Mae�eeUm OA Gage m•- [E ROUGH FRAMING OR CARPET ROUGH SAWN TRIM ABBREVIATION WOOD BLOCKING -- GLU-LAM WOOD m« �- PARTICLE BD. OR -- t_ I WOOD FIBER BD. RIGID INSULATION -- ACOUSTICAL CEILING -'sh op" EEc f� ast eNr ere« 691V Bv1.s1 aM seeW sTb.n Nert� ono awnhsESWIm LL« C ED -q - 5"D aYOrd e+Naca�am+l.n m eeRr«,. yp« e,pp.rr tu; ary a.F«a .0 TF1 tel�Jane TPrn' 113, iMa TP TIXYt PepR ibles TTo/g em tieo v TTW61.a Too O 'w. heea T ree. E9sa TTP T,yw, .n uargow MMC. VHe« Plotee alvas usN Anae.a Itt u9rm ewl�p roe. LEG HNMf a«u. G.a. 5Wr CARPET � wr ABBREVIATION v MECH./ELEC. r m« � as re.as Hswua uraa n.e. GT Gpn Coe «cw ay.. u:Iee.a ere. wACwea 304 TEXAS AVE. SUiTE 200 AVON, CO 81620 IIY' .AOR w.euu, c A+ w,eP Dwr. erRY r HM Aaw Lee!RM LAv away Nefi ro wMM o� Mn wr, MAx ro wweo� weP:.. re.w Kb: wWv I MPI MBC Meq. MA1tel,eMe sc NIX of K PN MTs NI>. ,1ppMJb: Mn a eu: Q4a BETLM THE DIFFERENT PARTS SHOLILD BE REPORTED TO THE oPP � CppoNu an, w CkFeNee ww awHe. n• GARAGE 5-3 C. ALL LURK SHALL COMPLY WTHH ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES PER Mro+ Me.rweue ra) MWMeve Ereel wul M1 HIS OR HER RE✓EW WERE CALLED FOR ANYIUNERE IN THESE • Mr nre' Maen Mew 116T -3-1 MaF..y R ReeePP Rlee K• wr. w99e KSI Iwaa tel KGD ReePR�e wet. R1 ReWeIwaEPew Meu�Ssw wis -'sh op" EEc f� ast eNr ere« 691V Bv1.s1 aM seeW sTb.n Nert� ono awnhsESWIm LL« C ED -q - 5"D aYOrd e+Naca�am+l.n m eeRr«,. yp« e,pp.rr tu; ary a.F«a .0 TF1 tel�Jane TPrn' 113, iMa TP TIXYt PepR ibles TTo/g em tieo v TTW61.a Too O 'w. heea T ree. E9sa TTP T,yw, .n uargow MMC. VHe« Plotee alvas usN Anae.a Itt u9rm ewl�p roe. LEG HNMf a«u. G.a. 5Wr v.aEn. rNa � wr �ry�M vr.} Asea. TOP v MECH./ELEC. BILL and MARIE WISE COTTLE GRAYBEAL M a+ mPce. uY eNn mcap ton) nro Bo oNau woe 90% CONSTRUCTION `DOCUM.ENT SET AUGUST 26, 1999 fS SHEET INDEx ARCHITECTURAL AL1 COVER SHEET A2.1 PROJECT SITE PLAN A3.1 LOWER / UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A3.2 ROOF PLAN A4.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5.1 BUILDING SECTIONS A6.1 WALL DETAILS A6.2 DETAILS A8.3 DETAILS A7.1 ENLARGED STAIR PLANS AIR.1 DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE AB.2 DOOR AND WINDOW DETAILS A8.3 DOOR AND WINDOW DETAILS ABA INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A9.2 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A10.1 LOWER / UPPER LEVEL REFLECTED CLG PLAN S1.0 STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS SIASTRUCTURAL FOUNDATION AND MAIN LEVEL PLANS 51.2 STRUCTURAL ROOF FRAMING PLAN S4.0 STRUCTURAL DETAILS S4.1 STRUCTURAL DETAILS CIVIL ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR MARCIN ENGINEERINTG, LLC ODDO ENGINEERI`iG TODD HABERMANN CONSTRUCTION P.O. BOX 1062 302 EIGHTH STREET, SUITE 3'_F5 P.O. BOX 1210 AVON CO 81620 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 BASALT, CO 81621 (970) 748-0274 (970) 945-1006 970 927-3031 DATUM ELEVATION (970) 748-9021 FAX (970) 945-2977 FAX 970 927-3732 FAX 1PJ0'-Lr" LRGHITECTURAL EQUALS '7L5 USGS TOM MARCIN BOB ODDO- PROJECT DIRECTORY OWNER ARCHITECT MECH./ELEC. BILL and MARIE WISE COTTLE GRAYBEAL RADER ENGINEERING E. ANY MATERIALS PROPOSED FOR SU85'ITUTION OF THOSE YAW ARCHITECTS CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION, ARE HEREBY rADE EL PASO NATURAL GAS 37347 U.S. HIGFI" i P.O. BOX 780 304 TEXAS AVE. SUiTE 200 AVON, CO 81620 EL PASO, TX 79901 P.O. BOX 6337 970 845-7910 (915) 541-3156 AVON, CO. 81620 970; 845-7522 FAX (915) 581-4903 (970) 748-1516 DREW RADER* CONFORM TO THE REVIEWED SA^,PLES. ANY WOW IWICH DOES NOT (970) 748-1518 FAX GENERAL NOTES. THE SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE DRA IAN136, WHICH COWOR�i SHALL !# RET O',ED *0 REPM1.ACED W I0 WW U4IC- ANN DARBY ACE CGGPRIII E AND CONTINUOUS WORK WICATED OR fS SHEET INDEx ARCHITECTURAL AL1 COVER SHEET A2.1 PROJECT SITE PLAN A3.1 LOWER / UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A3.2 ROOF PLAN A4.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5.1 BUILDING SECTIONS A6.1 WALL DETAILS A6.2 DETAILS A8.3 DETAILS A7.1 ENLARGED STAIR PLANS AIR.1 DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE AB.2 DOOR AND WINDOW DETAILS A8.3 DOOR AND WINDOW DETAILS ABA INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A9.2 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A10.1 LOWER / UPPER LEVEL REFLECTED CLG PLAN S1.0 STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS SIASTRUCTURAL FOUNDATION AND MAIN LEVEL PLANS 51.2 STRUCTURAL ROOF FRAMING PLAN S4.0 STRUCTURAL DETAILS S4.1 STRUCTURAL DETAILS CIVIL ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR MARCIN ENGINEERINTG, LLC ODDO ENGINEERI`iG TODD HABERMANN CONSTRUCTION P.O. BOX 1062 302 EIGHTH STREET, SUITE 3'_F5 P.O. BOX 1210 AVON CO 81620 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 BASALT, CO 81621 (970) 748-0274 (970) 945-1006 970 927-3031 DATUM ELEVATION (970) 748-9021 FAX (970) 945-2977 FAX 970 927-3732 FAX 1PJ0'-Lr" LRGHITECTURAL EQUALS '7L5 USGS TOM MARCIN BOB ODDO- TODD NABERMANN BUILDING CODE INFORMATION GENERAL NOTES IS -t4 UBC WIT- PITKIN COUNTY AMMENDMENT5 A TLE AIA DCC" NT 20L CIE ERAL CONDRIONS OF THE E. ANY MATERIALS PROPOSED FOR SU85'ITUTION OF THOSE CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION, ARE HEREBY rADE SPECIFIED OR CALLED OUT BT TRADE NAME IN THESE DOCLO ENT5 THIS PROJECT CON515TC OF A CARETAKER BUILDING A PART O THESE CONTRACT P003ENTS, COPIES ARE ON FILE SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE ARO4ITEC7 FOR RENEW. THE TWAT AND ARE AVAILABLE FOR NSPECTICN AT THE OFFICES OF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBM!T SAMPLES WHEN REQUIRED BY THE IS TO BE LOCATED JUST NORTH OF AN EXISTING WOME ON ARCM!TECT ARCHTECT PND ALL SUCH SAMPLES SHALL BE REYSXD BY'HE LOT R-14. ACCESS 15 FROM'! TWE SAME DR!VEWAY AND - ARCHITECT BEFM THE WORK IS PERFORMED. UORC "T INCLUDES A CARPORT FOR ONE CAR WITW TWO PARKING B. THE CONTACT DOl'1. RffM5 CONSIST OF THE AGREEMENT, THE CONFORM TO THE REVIEWED SA^,PLES. ANY WOW IWICH DOES NOT SPACES ALONKT TWE DRIVEWAY. GENERAL NOTES. THE SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE DRA IAN136, WHICH COWOR�i SHALL !# RET O',ED *0 REPM1.ACED W I0 WW U4IC- ACE CGGPRIII E AND CONTINUOUS WORK WICATED OR CONFORMS AT TME CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. SUBCONTRACTORS RE45094ABLY RIFLED N ANY O, E OF THE COMMENTS SHALL BE SHALL SUBMIT REOU98TS AND SAMPLES FOR REVIEW THROUGH THE PROJECT INFORMATION SUPPLIED. AS TH0U33H FULLY COVERED N ALL ANY DISC-EPANCT GENERAL CONTRACTOR WEN JDW IS LET THRCWH HIM OR HER A. OCCUPANCY BETLM THE DIFFERENT PARTS SHOLILD BE REPORTED TO THE REQUIRED VERIFICATIONS AND SJE5IITTAL5 TO ISE MADE N DWELLINY-s UNIT R -I ARCHITECT ATEDiATELY. ADEMATE TIME AS NOT TO DELAY WORK IN PROGRESS. GARAGE 5-3 C. ALL LURK SHALL COMPLY WTHH ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES F. 51+CP ORAWN35 SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT FOR 8. TYPE OF CCNSTRJCTICN- V -NR AND ORDINANCES. AND SHALL BE F'ERFOR"ED TO THE 14&EST. HIS OR HER RE✓EW WERE CALLED FOR ANYIUNERE IN THESE - STANDARDS OF CRAFTSMANSM!-.BY JOJPNEYMEN OF T.E DOOXENTs REVIEW SHALL ISE MADE BY THE ARC;WITECT BEFORE C. BUILDING 5C UARE FOOTAGE APPROPRIATE TRADES, LOW 15 BEGUN, AND WORK SHALL COWIDW TO THE REVIELED NET LIVEABLE AREA: SHOP DRAWNGS, SUBJECT TO REPLACEMENT AS REQUIRED IN D. 1.HE5E DOCUMENTS ARE IWIMED TO MULIYJE ALL PARAGRAPH E, ABOVE, LABORMATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND SERNCES REPORED TO LOWER LEVEL 324 SF. - COMPLETE ALL WOK DESCRIBED HEFSK IT IS THE G. THE SUILDPG INSPECTOR SHALL BE NOTIFIED ST THE UPPER _EVEL 366 SF. RESPON601Ln OF THE CONTRACTOR TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION CONTRACTOR "NEN THERE IS NEED OF INSPECTION AS REQUIRED OF THE ARCHITECT ANY CONDITIONS UMICH WILL NOT PEF"T BY THE LNIFORM BUILDING CODE OR ANY LOCAL CODE OR TOTAL NET LIVEABLE AREA 688 SF. CONSTRUCTION ACCCTa M TO THE NTIJNTIONS OF.THESE ORDNANCE. - GARAGE / MECH. 322 5F. - - DOCU ENTS. IT IS THE R'E6PON SLITY OF THE ARCHITECT To PRONDE DETAILS AFDAOR DIRECTIONS REGAFDRG DESIGN INTENT H. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL QBE RESPCN5IBF.E FOR THE SAFETY - - La$7ff 1T Ev11TERED BT EXISTING CONDITIONS OR um AND CAIS OF ADJACENT PROPERTES DURING C-ONSTRICTIONI FOR NEGLECTED IN THE DOC ENTS - COMPLIANCE WTw FEDERAL AND STATE OSAA REGULATIONS, AND D. TOTAL PROJECT SQUARE FOOTAGE - - FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL "URC UNTIL IT 15 DELNERED LOILER LEVEL 44'1 5F. ,UPPER LEVEL 813 SF. .. GARAGE / MECH. 322 SF. _ _ - - TOTAL PROJECT SF. 1382'$8 - - - CO14, THE OA ER I. ALL 6It*S&4NCTED TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DRgNFNOb'OVER SCALED DIMEN5049. DIMENSIONS NOTED WITH 'NTS.` DENOTES NOT TO SCALE. J. CONTRACTOR SHALL IERTY AND COORDINATE ALL OPENINGS THROLOW FLOORS, CEILINI AND WA`LS LATH ALL ARCHITECTIRAI STRUCTURAL. MECHANICAL, PLVIMW3' AND ELECTRICAL DRA"I a K C RACiCJIF WLL ASSUME FESPW51501Y OF ITEMS REQUIRB COORDINATION AND F E50LUTICN DURING THE 81DDNG PROCESS. ■ ,11lIIIIII _ � Allis COTTLE PARR yYBEAL ARCHITECTS LTD P.O.BOX 6337 37347 LIS HWY 6 AVON, CO 81620 P (970)748-1510 F (970)748-1518 510 EAST HYMAN ASPEN, CO- 81611 P (970)925-28137 F (970)925-3736 P,O,BOX 3507 107 NORTH FIR ST. TELLURIDE, CO. 81435 P (970)7'"8-3037 F 19701718 3.?'36 WISE RESIDENCE CARETAKER LOTR-14 STARWOOD PITKIN_COUN A l .. P 1995 Lq1 ilL pvTBLAL YeV A?GIiILCii Found rebor and cap 425.33' i ! I I / f R=645.80 \ ' \ I 1=26'32'0 1 L=299.08'' \ Chord Beoring=NO2'43 47"W Chord Length=296.41' j LOT R-14 ! 0^ LOT R-14 j F, Z I ..-� _� l t ! f _ -• R=588.45' I rama aueatw / 10°HI St- I ea) Chord gring=SOP43'47'W I chord Length=180.21' I Electric Meter /j rrruy ar.r 30' Building1-4- J� Setback / 1 I! I I I i WAN .. sr" I I L 58638'00"W -- •� — — Found rebar 591.05' and cap Cap Elevation = 221.40 586'56'00"W Found rebar 320.64' and cap NOTICE: Aocordin to Cdarado law y� MUST any lead action bo— span y erf«tin mie --y wnh{n three re ane, ra,+ rat di.— ouch defect. Inn swot, may any action bored re upon any defect in tbie survey be wd m than ten y-1ham the date of -Aft.ti- shown hereon BUILDING LOCATION SURVEY LOT R-14 STARWOOD PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO NOTES: 1) SURVEY DATE- July 28, 1999. 2) Location of Improvements, Lobines, and Easements ore based upon the Final Plat Storwood and Survey Monuments found it the time of this survey, as shown hereon. This Survey does not constitute a boundary survey nor any investigation into record easements or encumbrances associated with this property. 3) Utilities are shown approximately and should be field verified prior to excavation. 4) Morcin Engineering LLC does not warrant or certify to the integrity of any Digital Data supplied in conjunction with this map and survey. Aleck C. Cheney P.L.S. 32834 moo Re 0 uIJO� GRAPHIC SCALE c IN P6S3' ) imr - e0 ft. MARGIN ENGINEERING LLC ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS P.O. BOX 1062 AVON, CO 81620 (970) 748-0274 FAX (970) 748-901' 4 Lo� n n o \ -- Pd'IC OWER LEVEL PLAN \� SCALE: 1/4" . I'-0' LOWER LEVEL NET SF. 366 S.F. TOTAL NET LIVEABLE B.P. 1I 5F. GARAGE/1'1EC1-I/5TO S.F. 322 S.F. _ DN / ELEv. -I0 " D. BT R ROOF 'I ELEV.19-m. ARROW INDIO 6 DIVERR CdlTTER TE vNo Dc0(ePol�T� ' .m I LEv. EXISTING GARAGE GOR-TEN,6EEL _ ROLFI /� TVP d:Q EASEMENT TO. RIDGE EL: HC' -m' 6-11 1 V. v E ISTINC- TRAN�FORYIER ... I � TO BE RELOCATED .. 111 \ EXISTING GARAGE ROOF GUTTER TTP. ARRO,U INDIC. Dlv£RTER CC��}}'' W/NO DOLLN51 1 ROOF 8 51TE PLAN SCALE: Vd" . V -m° 1 T4 COTTLE YAWYBEAL ARCHITECTS LTD 510 EAST HYNAN ASPEN, CO. 81611 N 970)925-2867 F 970)925-3736 '.O.DOX 3507 107 NORTH FIR ST. TELLURIDE, CO. 81435 -P 1970 2&-307-- _ F (970)728-3236 P.O.ROX 6337 37347 US HUY 6 AVON, CO 81620 P (970)748-1516 F (970)748-1518 WISE RESIDENCE CARETAKER LOTR-14 PITKIN COUNTY A3.2 GOR-TEN,6EEL _ ROLFI /� TVP ROOF GUTTER TTP. ARRO,U INDIC. Dlv£RTER CC��}}'' W/NO DOLLN51 1 ROOF 8 51TE PLAN SCALE: Vd" . V -m° 1 T4 COTTLE YAWYBEAL ARCHITECTS LTD 510 EAST HYNAN ASPEN, CO. 81611 N 970)925-2867 F 970)925-3736 '.O.DOX 3507 107 NORTH FIR ST. TELLURIDE, CO. 81435 -P 1970 2&-307-- _ F (970)728-3236 P.O.ROX 6337 37347 US HUY 6 AVON, CO 81620 P (970)748-1516 F (970)748-1518 WISE RESIDENCE CARETAKER LOTR-14 PITKIN COUNTY A3.2 A z 4,- - \-,