Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.eh.264326301001 (1996) (Main House)Fg, .ASPEP TKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPAR"f ":T _ APPLiCA JN FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAG`r DISPOSAL STEM 130 S. Galena St., Aspen Colora6o 8161' �. Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970-920-5039 P;irm:ii# ! �%� — Parcel ID#�L F-:rmit Fo:': New Installation ( ) Repair ( ) Remodel Emergency Use ( ) N of OWNER_ J Ll x.. r ti 7 11Is Z - Owner's Mailing Address 15-71) r[ ee es -64x -e- Business Phone: Home Phone: Name of Agent Agent's Mailing Address Business Phone : Cell Phone : Fax Copy of permit to be sent to: Owner ( ) Agent ( ) Both ( ) St.-e:et Adaress ST S Legal Description: Lot R-12 ,BlockSubdivision iLea<tub R- !7l'r Si,e of lot: acres Type of proposed structure: M a, ►r Size of bldg. envelope: _ r Total area living space (sq. ft): Do C) # of Bedrooms, offices and similar size :rooms: 5 ;uetctker Unit: Attached Detached # of Bedrooms, offices and similar size rooms: i Water:( )Private well( )Spring ( )Stream ( YCommunity/Public (Name of System) Is Proof of Adequate Water Attached ? ('t -)-Yes( ) No i taas this l:roject been approved by Pitkin County ? (4 Yes ( ) No o copy --f the floor plan attached ( required ) ?A-) Yes( ) No Application for an individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. The undersigned acknowledges that the above information is true and that false information will invalidate the application and any subsequent permit. Issuance of thepe it does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may be undertake until all approvals and perm have been obtained. The owner assumes all responsibilities in case of failure or inadequacy of this system. h! 0 Date / - j I - -I Signature of applicant For department use below ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PERMIT FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Design Criteria of s tem be Installed Any changes must be submitted and approved in writing) Septic'� tank capacity: -4Cf p U -� gallons Absorption area: i pa � �e�� sq. ft. -C4'``'/1, - "Iu t'l �tt A't.0- % �' ��� a+p . i, &D�� U 0 v An inspection is required prior to backfill of any-com onent of the distribution system. Design by Engineer Required ? ( )Yes (No All plans and specifications of the engineer must be followed. Any changes must be approved in writing and the engineer must certify the final installation to the EnvironmentNI Health Department in writing. Permit approval by: )Lt l'LC Z4 Date Plans and specifications of the prl)posed individual 'wage disposal system have bee eviewed and are considered satisfactory. P r mission is hereby granted to the owner o; the agent to perform the work indicated in accordaino with the Pitkin County ISDS R66ulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from Vve date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. —4— Installer: _ �j C.1 C zX� 3 -2y - As -Built drawingg must be Included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. �,c�s•L 1/�l�Mt.te Final Inspection Approval: ,�—F r �L�r / Date: Date requested: �O �jMlfG U U Date Pd.: f Receipt #: Z LTG .457 Received by: h, i lVk Information complete: f /! ? ^ /'-spen / Pitkin Environmental Health Departmeiit Contact Log Sheet Name: S i Parcel ID#: 3— 2& — 1 —0 U Address: 5 Date Person Spoken To Comments / Action to be Taken Initials Time p ril5�` 4 ✓L , d 3 ca�[� 70ri Ben /� . �/� C� Ir � •5 l 3� , eft cv&n a dd- cav Iu c co + _ , q t, B OseA 41 f r 1 ` 1 ' s�� 6 o 1 Si X, Lxj in S + Sim rrc ^. pen / Pitkin Environmental Health Departmel Contact Log Sheet Name:- S i d Parcel ID#: 2- q z� - 24 3— 01— DD Address: rug o Date Person Spoken To Comments / Action to be Taken Initials 5 'r ,5 4- 1 ` $ .LY -i s `n 4 hL4 IRA-�( 9 Lt) i=11"I .s &n 4L" -iti ri IL i t i n 4)6v) • ( in i- L 05-5ej Or / -sl _ KE i r 7 ew U Q(/ I i lei V 533 IL e� z ? 3© ........-........,,.,,..,,.u, , . u,.,. --V-. u$.,I�� Contact Log Sheet Name Parcel ID Gy -a 3-C71- 00/ street address Date Received: a Application ` p� Fee p' Perc test Soil profile p� Site plan r.-/- wni tcP finnr elan 0 Water Quality 0 Water Quantity Person Spoken To comments Action to be Ta,itials Date -M1 - ORM �jg� .. . MWv Ilp III Fill iI AW, W11A IF /, 11110M MO. AlIi!11 MII ._ SIX w— MAR KWVA MOV V - tri" ... i�� Lo- Aspen / Pitkin Environmental Health Department Contact Log Sheet tiName:'3 l -A Parcel ID#: 9JP 4: - a,( -P3 — DI -WI Address: DZZ I N • S Yl c c�'{ Y. Date Person Spoken To Comments / Action to be Taken Initials L -+ t3K, T7 eek iv\ c c n-bX4 W1 -Be t -s �� • � VIG�b 2 e j �I f zzw ` Q V2 "�L l �5 V U i, t5 J pec( �, s i) yyw V l ( at ) v s <I - +-� B IL ) i- ujow cI I . - S "et -/ Y/&r 1 14- e 2 f in C-1-5"40, h -� 1cj -k-) sAh.qere t Ps cQ t -p 1 el. 0 -4--, r �, vim; �Z C '4 coq - h 0 i1 5 c` S 5ZI S /�i%%6-O % 17 Bch ^' ISO eia s S& ,-.spen / Pitkin Environmental Health Department Contact Log Sheet Name: Parcel ID#: Address: Date Person Spoken To Comments / Action to be Taken Initials 2O O a i i I i ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1SDS DESIGN REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Permit # Name Juliet Shield Parcel ID # House Siz 6000 (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 130 Number of Bedrooms, Lofts, Offices, Similar Rooms; Main House 5 Number of Bedrooms, Lofts, Offices, Similar Rooms, Caretaker unit ? / Average Daily Waste Flow 900 # bedrooms X 2 people/br X 7 State Review Required? no Perc Rate 54 (T) Design Flo w (Q) _ # bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 2730 Absorption Area (A= Q/5 X SART) A = 4012. q. ft. of absorption area required ; - ", ® d 4107AAO 223 infiltrator units without reduction A maximum 30°lo reduction is:-aIIQW for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system: 2808.58.5 sq.ft. with reduction .1'56 infiltrator units with reduction Type of system: []Absorption trenches []Absorption bed [] Gravelless chambers []Dry well []Seepage Pit []Pumping Chamber Is an Engineer -Designed System required? no;_ yes _ reason: Minimum tank capacity 3,000 gallons. 3185 x.30/24=4,000 SETBACK F WCL„'. # of feet Remember: 8 feet of additional distance for each 100 gallons/day of design flow,over 1,000 gallons/day should be added unless an RPE can verify that it is not necessary to prevent contamination. APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY: DATE: SYSTEM INSTALLED BY: DATE OF FINAL INSPECTION REQUEST: FINAL INSPECTION BY: DATE: Printed on Recycled Paper G1 Y COI STRUCTI ENVIR( 0333 Lions Ridge Rd. Q Carbondale, CO 81623 .- f3o,11 - 6 �.(� to y«s I -fa.Ic f 5 hawte- 1a1&( k L U563C . = 72 Inc. Steve Fitzgerald (303) 963-0576 Fax (303) 963-4658 _fig X r�T (970) 920-5070 �1 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET ,jell �„J GrC T 1 y ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 05 I 6 L) Am,- �`/ 17 7-j D -Fj .D I Par Plh a 7,0 J�ITIL MF OA Cj e -7 �100o C,/q I Hoe ?, �. r,"� j , " , q T- 7 -JAI Sep- N� �l00r-N C- CA •a /*DDIT/off% ! t 1 �ELAAJ - CONtk - � C S\�E • - --_—_ T� ewe- f L0T 1AAI T/ 0Wi- 77an/ opt/ � � s Pa s.� c. � ys-� • �S i .. i 0 r- ----------- re T o 41 ci 9A7- qa3�v r Nelson Environmental & Wastewater Solutions, Ltd, W October 15, 1997 S Ms. Juliet Shield 1570 Homestake Drivef'� Aspen, CO 81611 D "1 ti' G� Subject: Soils Evaluation and Percolation Tests for an 1 WdVke4age?�Vstem Design for the Remodeled Shields Residence on Lot R.-12, States numbered as 0269 North Starwood Drive NVlFiONi�jav ASpEb.; i p1 ,' iN Dear Juliet, As requested, Nelson Environmental and Wastewater Solutions, Ltd., perforated a soils study and percolation tests to design an additional septic system for the remodeled residence. We conducted this study in accordance with Article 5 of the Pitkin County individual Sewa¢c Disposal System Retulttion on September 29, 1997. We have based. our recommendations on the subsurface conditions encountered- Please furnish this letter to the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department at our earliest convenience in order for you to obtain a permit to construct this individual sewage system. Existing Construction and Pr !;n Septic �intems: The house after remodeling will be a five bedroom, five and one-half bathroom, two story structure of approximately 5000 square feet of living area. Where is also an attached one bedroom, one bathroom attached caretaker unit in the house. This unit will contain about 600 square feet. There were three septic systems already on the property. The first was built last year for the barn. The other two were done previously as replacement septic systems to the main house. As we understand from the excavator, only one of these systems is to be retained in place to treat part of the wastewater flow from the residence. This investigation is to evaluate the soil in order to construct another new onsite sewage system for wastewater flows from the south part of the main house. Site Conditions: The property is a lot in the Starwood Subdivision of approximately 5 acres. The existing main residence on the property is being enlarged and remodeled. The drinking water to the house is to be provided from the subdivision water system. The road and access drive are constructed. The building site is on a portion of the lot located above a lateral of the Red Mountain Ditch flowing through the lot from South to North and is just west of the maid, residence. This ditch. is P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass Millage, CO 81615 Office (970) 923.3289 Home & Fax (970) 923.2766 Shield Residence Remodel ` Sails Evaluation and Percolation Test for Individual Sewage System Design Lot R-12, Starwood Subdivision October 15, 1997 Page 2 about sixty feet below the main residence site and is now lined with culvert through the area of the existing buildings. The lot vegetation is primarily pasture and mature landscape. The higher areas of the property, near the main residence, are vegetated with young aspen trees and oak brush. The ground surface of the site appears natural throughout the proposed area of the new absorption field. The ground slopes to the west at a 15% grade is this area. There is an unused well located in the pasture lot about 260 feet below the planned, new absorption system. Sub urfacr Conditions: A soil profile pit was excavated to a depth of nine and one-half feet. The profile excavation was done about ten feet above the proposed absorption area site. No groundwater was encountered and bedrock was not present within nine feet of the surface of the ground. The top twenty-four to thirty inches of soil in the profile excavation was a dark gray -brown topsoil with a characteristic clay loam texture. Below the topsoil and to the bottom of the profile excavation, a slightly moist, reddish fine sandy clay of relatively uniform consistency was present. This subsoil contained a few angular rock fragments froze two to ten inches in size. Both the topsoil and the clay exhibited some smearing and compaction from the pressure of earthmoving, equipment. The soil conditions were evaluated with standard percolation test procedures at the approximate location shown on Figure 1 _ The soil in which the percolation testing was conducted consisted of the topsoil and the bottom of each hole was just into the reddish sandy clay. The soil was well consolidated and showed some tendency to swell when wet_ Percolatjon_Testing: Percolation testing was performed in the proposed absorption area west of the building and north of the existing barn. The shallow holes were hand dug with an post hole auger at the bottom of backhoe excavations dug to a depth of two and one-half feet. They were cleaned out with hand tools before the initial presoak was begun. Before presoaking for the percolation test, the sidewalls were scraped, and three inches of gravel were placed in the bottom of each hole to protect the bottom of the hand dug test holes from fine, scoured soil coming off the sidewalls as the water was added. We pre-soaked the percolation test holes by adding water at regular 0 Shield Residence Remodel _ Soils Evaluation and Percolation Test for Individual Sewage System Design Lot R-12, Starwood Subdivision October 15, 1997 Page 3 intervals for approximately eight hours before starting the percolation test measurements. The a test holes were refilled every two hours until evening. Some water remained in the percolation test holes after the presoaking periods_ The results of the percolation testing are presented in Table I. These results indicate the sandy clay topsoil exhibited percolation rates between 32 and 57 minutes per inch, with an average percolation rate of 43 minutes per inch, slow but acceptable_ This topsoil is considered a suitable soil for a conventional infiltration trench design for the on-site sewage system, although the underlying clay layer may be a limiting factor. To utilize the sandy clay topsoil as the absorption material! we recommend trenches. These trenches should be installed no deeper than 24 inches. Limitations: This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area for use for sewage disposal design purposes. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon data obtained from our site visits at the location indicated. There is some possibility that the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface soils across the site may not have been evident at the time of this investigation, and may need additional evaluation, if further excavation reveals conditions different from those described. This office should be advised of any unusual situations as soon as possible so we may reevaluate our recomtnendatiens. If you have questions or if we may be of further assistance, please call the office. Sincerely, Robert F. Nelson President Reviewed By' ���' `• • • •' •�S�F 0. CyG.',Qcn yy o l's 3172 s; a Ed Church, P,E, E. l7. Church, Inc., Engineers and t3eQ"1 +•••••• !`CNA ll� ..�.. Nelson Etrjq anmentaX & Wastewater Solutjon% Ltd, E W _ S TABLE t - PERCOLAMN TEST RESULT FORM Hole Length Depth at Depth at Drop in Average _ Hole Depth of Interval Start of Interval End of Interval Water Level percolation No. (in.) (Minutes) (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) Rate(Min./inch) 1 27 20 97/8 813/16 11/16 20 813/16 81/16 3/4 20 81/16 71/4 13/16 20 71/4 65/8 5/8 32 2 28 20 55/9 43/4 7/8 20 4314 41/8 5/8 20 41/8 3 5/8 1/2 20 3 518 3 1/8 1/2 40 3 25 20 65/8 61/8 1/2 20 61/8 511116 7/16 20 5 11/16 55/16 3/8 20 5 5/16 415/16 3/8 57 Juliet Shield Property Lot R-13, Starwood Subdivision 0221 North Starwood Drive Date of Percolation Test PO. Box 6961 Snowr 289 Home & Fax (970) 923.2766 n Nelson Environmental & Wastewater Solutions, Ust EProperty Address: 0269 North Starwood Drive W Legal Description: Lot R-12 Starwood Subdivision Property Owner: Name Juliet Shield Address15701 emcstake_ Aspen„_CO 51611 Contractor: Excavating Contractor: Name ,Aspen Custom Builders Name Kit's Earthmoving Address0115 Park Ave. t/4 Address 14 Fender Lane Basalt _ CO 81621 Carbondale. CO 81623 Phone 927-9700 Phone 963-2892 Saturation and Swelling o Smeared surfaces removed Yes o Gravel Added X Yes To a 3" Depth o Date and Time presoak water added 09/29/97 Ca 9:35 a.m. o Amount of presoak water added 24 gallons/hole o Water remaining in holes after tow hoar presoak periods? Hole 1: _Yes X No Hole 2: _ Yes X No Hole 3 _ Yes X No Percolation Rate Measur+emeot Hole 1: 32 minutes/inch Hole 2: 40 minates/inch Hole 3: 57 minutes/inch AVERAGE 43 minutes/inch Groundwater: o Not Encountered at 9 1/2 ft. o Estimated depth to high seasonal water if not encountered- >50 feet o is arca believed to be subjoet to seasonal fluctuaions which could result in a seasonal water table? _ Yes X No Slope in absorption area 15% to the West bedrock o Not Encountered to 9 1/2 ft. o Estimuted depth if not encountered -80 ft. o Type of bedrock: _Sandstone X Claystone _Siltstone o is bedrock believed to be permeable? Yes X No 1 certify that the above information is correct anal complde to the best of my knowledW and that all tests were performed in accordance with the provisions of firkin County Individual _Sewer Disposal System RP., lation, Section 5-1 through .5-7 and ttrtder the supervision of a Registered Professional Engineer. Robert F. Nelson President P-0•REG Reviewed by: o®Q.,.D 0 C;! 172 �; o Ed Church, P.E. E. O. Church, Inc., - Engineers and Geologt: <c, S�ONAl. P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Office (970) 923.3289 Home & Fax (974) 923.2766 Nelson Environmental & Wastewater Solutions RA E W September 26, 1995 S Juliet Shield 1570 Homestake Drive Aspen, CO 81611 Subject: Soils Evaluation and Percolation Tests for an Individual Sewage System Design for a Barn and Agricultural Building at the Shield Residence on Lot R- 3, Starwood Subdivision, numbered as 0269 �- 7-N S-FAQW&e Dear Juliet, As requested, Nelson Environmental and Wastewater Solutions, Ltd., performed a soils study and percolation tests to design a septic system for the proposed residence. We conducted this study in accordance with Article 5 of the Pitkin County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulation. We have based our recommendations on the subsurface conditions encountered. We will furnish this letter to the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department at our earliest convenience to obtain a permit to construct this individual sewage system. Proposed Construction: The proposed barn is to be a frame agricultural building with one bathroom and four horse stalls. Site Conditions: The property is a developed lot in the Starwood Subdivision of approximately 3 acres. -There_is an_existing residence -on the -upper podion."e4)mp erty. The drinking water to the barn is to be provided from the subdivision water system. The road and access drives are constructed to the property and the barn. The barn building site is on a portion of the lot located above a large meadow and just below the middle lateral of the Red Mountain Ditch. The upper part of the lot is covered with some scrub oak brush and grass. The lower part of the lot is primarily irrigated meadow. There are several irrigation, ditches in the area, and the closest has been recently relocated and lined with a large ADS corrogutated culvert. The ground surface of the barn site appears natural throughout the proposed area of building and within the site of the absorption field. The ground slopes to the Southwest at a 10% grade in this area. P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass Village, CO. 81615 Office (303) 923.3289 Home (303) 923.2766 INP4.6-is ldwm Rt6 MCQ IT N 7" C -a ,.—.a&"-- TyPI CAi . -. rnunt. i.�srAe NEIY FEr�£ M r �w r � �+tlsT�fr i A� -- P2,� 3, 1 1 w Ac - CN J ) --�_ � ''''`�7T1N�o ., � e � I � � � Baa. • ..: Mint: 4 ` `— 0 ■ Nelson Environmental & Wastewater Solutions Ltd E W S TABLE I PERCOLATION TEST RESULT FORM Hole Length Depth at Depth at Drop in Average Hole Depth of Interval Start of Interval End of Interval Water Level Percolation No. (in.) (Minutes) (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) Rate(Min./Inch) 1 32 10 5 11/16 59/16 1/4 10 59/16 55/16 1/4 10 55/16 5 1/8 3/16 10 5 1/8 47/8 1/4 10 47/8 411/16 3/16 10 411/16 47/16 1/4 40 1 32 10 29/16 21/4 5/16 10 21/4 2 1/4 10 2 113/16 3/16 10 1 13/16 15/8 3/16 (refill) 10 47/8 211/16 13/16 10 211/16 27/16 1/4 40 1 32 10 13 1213/16 3/16 10 1213/16 125/8 3/16 - 10 125/8 127/16 3/16 10 127/16 125/16 1/8 10 125/16 123/16 1/8 i 10 123/16 121/16 1/8 80 Juliet Shields Property Lot R-13, Starwood Subdivision Date of Percolation Test: 09/12/95 P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass Village, CO, 81615 Office (303) 923.3289 Home (303) 923.2766 Nelson Environmental & Wastewater Solutions, Ltd E Property Address: 0269 North Starwood Drive— L �svl-a A& W r� Legal Description: Lot R-1 Starwood Subdivision Property Owner: Name Juliet Shield w0G169 Address1520 Homestake Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 l a� Phone 925-2020 Saturation and Swelling o Smeared surfaces removed X Yes o Gravel Added X Yes To a 4" Depth o Date and Time presoak water added 09/12/95 tea, 9:35 a.m. o Amount of presoak water added 5 gallons/hole (#1 & #3) 30 gallons/hole (#2) o Water remaining in holes after 8 hour presoak? Hole 1: X Yes _ No Hole 2: X Yes _ No Hole 3 X Yes _ No Percolation Rate Measurement Hole 1: 40 minutes/inch Hole 2: 40 minutes/inch Hole 3: 80 minutes/inch AVERAGE 54 minutes/inch Groundwater: o Not Encountered at 9 ft. o Estimated depth to high seasonal water if not encountered- >80 feet o Is area believed to be subject to seasonal fluctuations which could result in a seasonal water table? Yes X No Slope in absorption area 10% to the SW Bedrock o Not Encountered to 9 ft. o Estimated depth if not encountered -80 ft. o Type of bedrock: X Sandstone _Claystone _Siltstone o Is bedrock believed to be permeable? Yes X No certifyThat fine above information is correct and .complete to the_best of my knowledge and that all tests were performed in accordance with the provisions of Pitkin County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulation, Section 5-1 through 5-7. gobertF. Nelson President Reviewed oby: UlJ .iay, nmmnnei P F Schmeu; P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass Village, CO. $1615 Office (303) 923.3289 Home (303) 923.2766 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITRIN COUNTY COLORADO, GRANTING APPROVAL TO THE SIMON CARETAKER DWELLING UNIT Resolution No. 94-iW . RECITALS 1. Richard Simon, hereinafter "Applicant", has applied to the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, hereinafter "Board", for approval of a caretaker dwelling unit pursuant to Section 3-8.13(c) of the Land Use Code. 2. The Applicant's lot is zoned RS -20 and is approximately 4.489 acres in size. 3. Said parcel is described as Lot R12 of the Starwood Subdivision, more specifically described in Exhibit A, attached. 4. The Applicant proposes to deed restrict the caretaker dwelling unit pursuant to Ordinance 91-11. 5. The Board heard this application at a regularly scheduled meeting on May 31, 1994, at which time evidence and testimony was presented with respect to this application. 6. The Board determined that the proposed caretaker unit meets the criteria established in Section 3-8.13(c) of the Land Use Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board that it does hereby grant approval to the Simon Caretaker Dwelling Unit application subject to the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall submit a signed and recorded caretaker dwelling unit deed restriction, pilrsuant to Section 3- 8.13(a)(4) of the Code, to the Housing Office, prior to the f Resolution No. 94-ts Page 2 issuance of a building permit. 2. The caretaker dwelling unit shall be limited to 700 square feet of livable area and comply with all Housing Office Guidelines. 3. The Applicant shall contact the Environmental Health Department to schedule a site inspection to determine the capacity and condition of the septic systems, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the application and in the pu'.'.ic meeting. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 31TH DAY OF MAY, 1994 ATTE�T: Jganette Jones D�(puty Clerk a 2.1 Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: Timofhy E. Wh' sitt, County Attorney reso Simon cdu BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO By. Date_ APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: S Mckow--- Suzynnenchan, County Planning Director -a =a cn PJ m I ,j cn FJ r..3 F-.xNien q STATE OF NfISSOURI 1 CITY LOWS OF ST. ) � 71m fortzola -- rumCnt was adaa L�dg..! berx, Jr., in Olc City of S; of &LI Qu i, thisa! day of 199 .4, 5y P IANCES KASZ£LNIK 5rATE Ln59:v11_..+ '.Jn ✓Li�� • .c„gym Z r17.cu .,,uuu, Post -it Fax Note _ 7671 Cata3// d pagas� TO O.,�i .r From n t1HR 10 '94 11:01 STE:•IPPT T:TLE: marded at o'cloct 131r6Z16 !lrtd�� ; p`dcr Zr i' Lt 4. C K 7410 Pl. 44 Llri1 tt►:r, hi1le utr Clwt, ^•1 ,•J iec fI}),OC Ln r� WA -MA VTY DE4) BLN Ii. prII-I,g mad YazFism%m G. I T NI'11 iS, t>i, �vilie, *toe it 33 w d St. Lazis, a w &AM of hisuo�i, Ll t-.3 gm� d COO } 00111, i- h-ld ;..;d. lagby ad1 aad cmv y b RI(MARp SIMON, wticsc idd=Is 5057 Hall wood 30•12evard Holl ocd, -M Ln 'M� oral chef Cf a 33U?, of II1 }', in tb' C_% '" t J >�. aad 5::� :�Colcr�d46n wit: ° T=' -G-12, STA.RWOGD, 3c^urL:nto Bock 2A a!: t %�2 - v i the. P at Lherxf recerdtd in Bitch PaE as?70. Q o la/k/a Lot k—.2, 114507 ,}1 wiih 3li ita snd aamc 1594 zt Lye :e to ttc �j \ . c�rarzz SL_ �( uid :lJb;eci de d . T to tral csiat: tins fir lxord. • Jh Sim tkis zL.,i4 day of laniary, 149.1. � � Ln -A T AtIJ STATE OF NfISSOURI 1 CITY LOWS OF ST. ) � 71m fortzola -- rumCnt was adaa L�dg..! berx, Jr., in Olc City of S; of &LI Qu i, thisa! day of 199 .4, 5y P IANCES KASZ£LNIK 5rATE Ln59:v11_..+ '.Jn ✓Li�� • .c„gym Z r17.cu .,,uuu, Post -it Fax Note _ 7671 Cata3// d pagas� TO O.,�i .r From n 6 To Sc-qie-, S eunr 104°4 • ` — -- _. 866 L'S Xb'dL808'tL6'8£L£'4Z 18-19 3Nn.Ua3dOad LES L xo0 93:10 1s°d- oil S3SIadb31N] A11V - :�q a. Ntfld 3ddONdl e' e o j „W I 1910 opaolo; r r 9Aia4 P00m DIS HPON lZLO 3DN3GIS3?1 4131:AS ICo �� \ v e' 9 \ � � S3SSYa0030335 ! 5 \ � Hj11(3 NO11YAlt5 WO BnaOS ONLLSIX3 ♦ f it -n3M 13M ONIIS 53.._ of 7Yln I .Irl {S )IYO amus -f, ONIISDC3 V %#d6 . N 3 j ! I Oa'�NIISIN3 w� �•�' d af1Y1Y f S3SM0 3AI1YN 030335 S.I1lnW T"M 3ldYw,3ZY18Nwn171Y,"8/ YO arms 3SOa ,a3ddOO NYIa1SnY, �lR* --7rYO 8naOS ONI SM -R4 1S 3NOLS 01111 zo ter. 1wdwOD J„.\OOOM•JihUMO \ 3uY,v ariwv w4is- 03033S _e L.-" I _ CI 0 u S `�' .L♦ E � � NUSYMOl343NId OOnwONY i3dlNnr IOOMo00 OIM103a S Y . \ 0NIlSDC3 SIYINN3a3'd� �l 1 �rcN1 L Q w31s-LL1nw 3WAHINO QOS HIM 03LJYld 3NOISOYId 13S ONYS �NOILY��)JOlaOAId1300WYdS a �- — C (a01OYa1NOO — lYd3N30 HLM VNI133W 01911 _LY NOIlYoOI MN3A 3SY31 d) N0010 NOI1YOMal d0 NOt1YO01 - Nv0 BnaOS ON11SM � n e a .•� GOS E S35SY11`J 030335 ---! } S j 3ON33ONLLSDO�/ 1 / Ya O SI 38r)IV§d a31YM 3H10NY 13S N338 In Hl io nY iw1 IV 03NOIS30 38 M 3HL aOd NYId ONILVYId 311 310N 3SY3ld, Ct) tiQ 9- � Lv e, l 1 , oar • _ d ra AS R 1Sil 1NYId : 13SVHd L 19 L8'00'e-d" 1 enud poOWDIS 44JON IZT0 3DN3GIS3N C1131HS 00 E7 (S'JNIMYa0(33HOY11Y33S) 3an1Y33 a31YM (St3NtMYtlO 03H9Y11Y 3351 J 3an1Y3d a31YM r -' }iG R �Y -1 (a01OYa1NOO — lYd3N30 HLM VNI133W 01911 _LY NOIlYoOI MN3A 3SY31 d) N0010 NOI1YOMal d0 NOt1YO01 - Nv0 BnaOS ON11SM � n e a .•� GOS E S35SY11`J 030335 ---! } S j 3ON33ONLLSDO�/ 1 / Ya O SI 38r)IV§d a31YM 3H10NY 13S N338 In Hl io nY iw1 IV 03NOIS30 38 M 3HL aOd NYId ONILVYId 311 310N 3SY3ld, Ct) tiQ 9- � Lv e, l 1 , oar • _ d ra AS R 1Sil 1NYId : 13SVHd L 19 L8'00'e-d" 1 enud poOWDIS 44JON IZT0 3DN3GIS3N C1131HS mik 7v IITk—m F" IMPREVEMENT SURVEY OF LOTS R 12 & P 12, STARWO❑D, PITKIN COUNTY, COL RAD❑1 10-14 DL nE-M R A[ J P R r 8:7 P-12 %o Ac, fi- CURVE & LINE TABLE LLPI£ AZU AKZ! .81l►7Q' 'w IAorf am OaDB9Q' ,w C., !3'.X"29' hTN' 1A09' AG9B" 1119' N f/:i��'Y cr rncsar s�.cslava /Rsu' 2BPY r2051?8£ Lar maw !UJ/AfQ LINES IN SPACE L� fw,"r lav, LAND SURVEYS M✓1 1 I•� ( uM q u w l �I I 25 H ly �yOO. , FLDOt 1 1 I s I- n r [Alia l 00 4 49 14t \ LL u►. �- Z_ �oox \ S "t/ nAA.M IMPROVEMENT SURVEY CE:RTIF-I;ATE LEGEND AND NOTES THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON DUES NOT LIE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A IOO YEAR I IQCn: .;,yTITT THAT M INY ]1ST. 19% A SLRVEY VAS PCREDIRH HT IE L TKLANE dETCRIBCO PLmO HAZARD BOUNDARY. PLAT. A V AO nkANE, Ts u D LDL_ IARM VCRE rouNo TD HC 01 yU0 Will AS DQVN Cv iNi$ SFVETAIS ETRAC� Ym COaCCT�InNE CST Q NY KKNUMLACD¢ iq RII O' 1]INN TO ME A'i: SIWI. iWi .EDOC GRAVEL ® CONCRETE FOUND Z' IRM PIPE ® WOOD DECK -----_— O SET REHAR % CAP L.S. 14111 SYDNEY LD1CIC0E P" 14111 FOUND REBAR L CAP -*--FENCE LINE WATER VALVE a TELEPHONE PEDESTAL SLAYIFD hWZPWr1LPV IS lAUY !AC SIAffiVW Stl"VISIOP a4r ff PI7KIN CLENII' AfaWffE 1 !IDI YIX- LASCACNr IAVX Or AVD A"4aWf 70 KL LOT LIACS ELEVATION 1000.00 PT. WAS ASSUMED AT THE ENTRY AS SHOWN ON TMS SInWCv iMPROVEMENT SURVEY OF 221 NO. STA W D - BYLINES IN SPA SYDNEY L INCICEME C L.S. 14 1 1 1 Bax 121 CARROVDALG Caa 303-963- 832 DATE 03/30196 SCALE I' = 30VOB NaL L6 N W E S 0 IS' 30' ♦S' 60' SCALE: 1A=30' CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2' A1.1 SITE mm F Gv 2 / / / / A BITE PLAN O Al .2 SITE a / s CURVE $ LINE TABLE aLW,WrAAMYC RIW W r4iWV Gt?W rtWdj5;~ A%4V XOP ,MSN' MOM NN'atx/fI L1 J7'HS!' ".o' 3LTtr' ANN' vmv J 7vwr [IIC MEIN Li'fr sxWat tea' � LEGEND AND NOTES 1HRVlY KQOAATWk TAKEN M PEft 1f /ROM UNM i j~C 8Uh2Y, PATM. OONfRHfe raw r IROK PTH ® N o PECK O xr wn%w • CAP LA. Wil rGI.fP R�hR . OA. —It— rQCC LP! rNTa[VAIV! TSTIp! "ZeSTAL S AN7ZV "tW404 4p AWW)1ttr,�w+avlaEllYbif.'IYIlArGY/YJXfYCGUYn'RLCpCtl s knrisrcae�ovr werzrcr.Ho nrxi+�avr ro� torLAM ILLVATION I000DO FT. VIAS A69UKW AT M Mfi Ab SHOM ON TWO OLRVCY N A BITE PLAN O Al .2 SITE .. ......... . ........ .. ..... ...... . ........ .. ......... .. ......... .. ..... . .. . ....... . .. ......... .. ..... : LBSW - MM UNETYPM MAIN FLOOR PLAN 512M A2.5 4 A2.4 FOR VIMM-aION5, NOTP5, ETC, CJ gig ........................................ ......................................... MAIN FLOOR PLAN 512M A2.5 4 A2.4 FOR VIMM-aION5, NOTP5, ETC, CJ gig ........... ri - - - - - - - - -- - ■ r� ........... LM ........... .......... um FLO PUN fn