The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.eh.264327400001 (1989-92)7� v3-2741 a P ASPEN*PITKIN0 f,,,•,. --A 0'0 a ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT D wo/ u INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERtiIT N0: . TYPE OF PERMIT: Initial Construction ( )Emergency Use ( )Repair Work,(Pievious Permit f .) ( )Alteration of an existing system, or installation (Previous Permit 1 ) ( )Use Permit as a result of sale ( )Others ISSUED TO: DATE OF ISSUE- � �--- Oianer� 1T %J(� �/UD �%1/� -�ome PhonejZ,-12Business Phone Mailing Address 7o% Agent lAc.xEr I/FSi�iel Phone. !22-5— caress 12 (��l kiyv 0o IN12- Sewage Disposal System Work to be performed by This permit valid only for premises location by the following legal descriptions LJT SIZE %I, WATER SUPPLY U11il�rlJ� AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATF. 6Y/5/%6V6 0141M %N •/ This Individual Sewage Dispo al Permit is granted with regard to the following use: Ntratler of: Dodreoms Lofts Garbage Disposals_Dishwashers Clothheesy Washers CALCULATED AVERAGE DAILY WASTE LOAD (�� GALLONS. (24,0 (¢'[ LEON S' F Ac" - A�4 _ THE NATUP.E OF THE SYSTEM INCLUDED UNDER THIS PERMIT: `` � �� 'A,"N5 �ey L(JATG'>E� Tank Capacity—ILO-' Callon Minimu:a TP-2Abaorptiop Area of Tank or Treatment Units%C�� ethod of Final Disposals ,4��SnRO�( // �'r""� / rn� Square FeatMinimum ieacription (including brand name, if any) of other equipment or appurtnancess (�Gd/ue�A�Y j��ln1 G N�MQ G' �iC //00 �iE " ,r Other Conditions or Epccificationss �- /1IS4ST�/V�j 6AJ AU'01 %'1L)Nn L �6 vV� j /�' !� 7 S � CJS c l �I—Ike OCAD '�GL� � �' 71JA- Aej0'4 •Sffl'4C-� a4— y�� . STAGES REQUIRING INSPECTION BY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT: �� ( )before Excavation (Jfppon completion of excavation and prior to placement of gravel rK��ysten offore vabsorptnq ion freidon Prior to backfill of any component ( )Other, Specifys _ -- plans and specifications of the proposed sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are ccnsidered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to tfie owner or his agent to perform the work. indicated above in accordance with the Pitkin county Indivi 12al Srwa;e Disposal Re,:ulations in effect on the date of issue. In addition to general provisions set forth on the reverse iter-�ei, this Permit is subject to the following additional terns and conditions: -- Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Officer 1`PPROVED FOR ISSUE BY (title) --- - Tho ab.'lve individual xe•.rago disposal system installed by - artm<,nt. The uwnur '1T113 ail has bens en ioctcd for use by a representative of the Ass:en Pit in £nviran nsteals; nctw p re:;ponsibility in case of failure or inadequacy of thiasewaa disposal system. Complete as -built drawing attached. DATE O1 INAL INSp TI % ! Aspen/Pitkin Environmental ^� Health Officer BY TITLE-- -130 ITLE_ 930 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/920-5070 # recycled paper ASPEN*PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL• PERMIT Mame of OWNER MNO 16 PAA11V0X_ SGNEFLE2 PHONE Address of OWNER 7a1 S. /140NAr2C14 s'T .4cooEIV i CO Name of APPLICANT /'i�AE� AES�PHONE ~�O Z ' 2/5 S, NIoNARCW G •10 z M ex /Z369 A Z �! ?FRMIT TO BE: Xpicked Up < )Hailed tot TYPE OF PERMIT: W)New Installation ( )Repair ( jOwner ( )Applicant . 1 )Emergency Use ( )Alteration NOT due to failure LOCATION OF PROPOSED SY' S+73 74-/6 �,6 SeCTIo/V Z'l 72-f regal Description �a/�J Block 2 Filing Subdivision/it//y�TEH002SE size of Lot 6• acres SP /ASS TYPE 'OF_ STRUCTURE: (VSingle Family Dwelling ( )Othert Do YOU plan any further additions to the �t residence? ( )YES ONO Vo. of bedrooms 4 . No. of Lofts No. of Garbage Disposals 1 No: of Automatic Dishwashers 2 __ No. of Automatic Clothes Washers / WATER SUPPLY: ( )Private well, Depth or ( )Public, Name of system QpSpring ( )Stream or Creek TYPES OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: O4 Septic Tank/Absorption Field ( )Aeration Plant/Absorption Field ( )Composting Toilet ( )Incineration Toilet ( )Mound ( )Recycling, potable use ( )Recycling, other use ( )Vault Privy ( )Other: The initial site inspection must be arranged with the Aspen/Pitkin'Environmental Health Department (925-2020. 8:30-9:30 a.m.) before a permit can be issued. The individual sewage disposal permit must be issued before a building permit can be obtained. FINAL INSPECTION APPROVAL MUST BE GIVEN BY THE ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO BACKFILLING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. Application for an individual 5r. e daleondeany subaequentd. The ipermiigned �knovledge■ that the above information is true and that false infor v PP n�j�i Signature of Applicant DATE 46' Z 4 • is application becomes. invalid 12 months from the above date.) NOTE: PLOT PLAN must be filed with this application. Please locate the following items by measured distances: 1. Property lines and dimensions. Proposed and existing water wells on subject property and adjacent property. 3� Domestic water service lines. Proposed and existing buildings, driveways, and other structures. Streams, lakes, ponds, irrigation ditches, and other water courses. Proposed and existing individual sewage systems on subject property. , SUBMIT A REVISED PLOT PLAN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IF INSTALLATION IS TO BE CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL PLAN. - The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of this individual sewage disposal permit application and a permit fee in the amour. of S /YR , Receipt Number , Date Fee Received —by Administrative Officer PA (`i�-_> 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/920-6070 C•7 s asp �� •�� MOO A 10 1, 1� I U,� 4-�a� — � b0�� ..�x, y� d l 3 �Nh r4al r- yo9 Ss �-I 07 �3 y�9 5� y(7 yD Aspen Sanitarian 130 South Galena Aspen, Co. 81611 Mr. Bob Nelson Dear Bob, Peter Dictenberg 44 West 91 Street N.Y., N.Y. 10024 May 15, 1989 Thanks for your time the other day on the phone, your advice has really simplified things in regards to the septic system. Enclosed is a platte map of White Horse Springs with my parcel marked in red. I am also having an improvement survey r sent to you by someone #n Aspen. The survey shows the building envelope and there should be an overlay of the footprint of the house too. I am in the process of finding someone to do the Perk test. As soon as I do I'll have them contact you to work out the details. Also enclosed is a list of the fixtures in the house. Its a 5 bedroom house so there will be plenty of fixtures. Thanks again for your assist@nce. Yours truly, o�- Dictenberg House ----Bathroom and Fixture list / Toilet Wash Basin Bidet Shower Tub Dish -Washer U;AsI��R�I�Rcr&R Master Bath Bath #2 Z Bath#3 Bath #4 J 1 Bath #5 i Powder Room Exercise Room -Bath t1 Kitchen 3 I R�t�10 Ry (Zoo m Total -1-- S i5 i 3 5 Z i o�- MEMORANDUM To: Glenn Horn, Planning Office From: Rick Bossingham, Environmental Health Department Date: December 27, 1988 Re: Dictenberg 1041 Hazard Review, Parcel ID# 2465-274-00-001 The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the above-mentioned land use submittal under authority of the Pitkin County Code, Title II, and has the following comments. SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-7 and 5-200: Nicholas Lampiris, Geologist, states in the application that a standard septic system may be possible. However, since much of the lot has >30% slope and set backs are required from the water line and irrigation ditch, the sewage disposal system may have to be designed by a registered professional engineer to meet the Pitkin County Regulations on Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-6 and 5-205: The applicant should be required to connect to the subdivision water supply. AIR QUALITY: Sections 2-17 and 5-106: The applicant does not mention wood -burning devices. Any installed must comply with applicable regulations. No significant air quality impact is expected from the proposal. NOISE: Section 2-23 No adverse noise impacts are anticipated from this proposal. CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER LAWS: Section 2-2 This proposal is not anticipated to be in violation of any other laws which fall under this department's authority. +ao MEMORANDUM TO: County Attorney County Engineer Environmental Health FROM: Glenn Horn, Assistant Planning Director RE: Dictenberg 1041 Geologic Hazard Review Parcel ID # 2643-274-00-001 .y DATE: November 21, 1988 Attached for your review and comments is an application from Peter & Margaret Dictenberg requesting 1041 Geologic Hazard Review for a single-family homesite. Please review the attached material and return your comments no later than December 21, 1988 so that I have time to prepare a memo for the P&Z. Thank you. .*. 41. C A LAW OFFICES OF HERBERT S. KLEIN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 201 NORTH MILL STREET SUITE 203 ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 ( 303) 925-8700 TELECOPIER (303) 925-3977 November 17, 1988 _ Glenn Horn Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Peter Dictenberg 1041 Review Dear Glenn: Enclosed with this letter please find a Section Analysis prepared by Scarrow and Walker Surveyors defining the area of the proposed building envelope which contains slopes in excess of 30%. Generally, the northeasterly half of the building envelope contains slopes in excess of 30%. Because of the narrow and impractically shaped portion of the building envelope remaining with slopes less than 30%, Mr. Dictenberg wishes to pursue a 1041 Review with the Planning and Zoning Commission in order to permit portions of his house to be constructed on areas containing slopes in excess of 30%. We believe there are no reasonable alternatives to encroaching on such areas for the following reasons: 1. The building area needs to be set back from an existing access easement and roadway which lies along the southwesterly boundary of the building envelope. Therefore, we cannot move the envelope any further in that direction. This causes the building envelope to run up hill from the roadway which, after as little as 20 feet, starts encroaching on areas containing 30% slopes. 2. The portion of the building envelope containing less than 30% slopes is a long (approximately 160 feet) and narrow (between 20 feet and 40 feet) strip of land. It is impractical, if not impossible, to place a residence of a reasonable size (approximately 4500 square feet) within this area. The largest available area within the building envelope having a regular shape is approximately 40 feet by 40 feet. Considering height limitations, access, garage and the excavation necessary to utilize the area having less than 30% slopes, it is apparent that a 4500 square foot house would not fit within a 40 foot by 40 foot building envelope in this location. 3. Requiring the house to be placed in the lower portion of the building envelope will also destroy a mature grove of Glenn Horn November 17, 1988 Page 2 scrub oak trees which Mr. Dictenberg intends to preserve both for aesthetics and privacy as viewed from the building site as well as to provide visual screening of his house as viewed from the Mclain Flats Road. In addition, because of the proximity of the house to the existing access roadway, these trees will provide a visual and noise buffer. 4. Mr. Dictenberg intends to incorporate passive solar design into his residence. In order to accomplish the design the house requires a southern orientation. Therefore, the house cannot be placed within the building envelope in a manner which runs parallel to the access easement (the long side of the building envelope) but must be oriented somewhat diagonally across the narrow portion of the envelope. 5. The selected building envelope does not have any geologic problems nor unstable soils and, except for the presence of 30% or greater slopes, is an ideal location for the proposed residence. Except for the grove of scrub oak at the lower portion of the building envelope, the building envelope is clear of other vegetation. 6. The slope analysis further indicates that although there are slopes greater than 30% in the upper portion of the building envelope, these slopes do not exceed 38.4% at their steepest location. We believe that this excess slope percentage is minimal and does not create any unmitigatable conditions. Title information has been provided previously with respect to this application. Please consider this letter a formal request to process the application as a 1041 Hazard Review. Also enclosed is my check for $340.00 which you indicated to me was 4, the remaining portion of filing fees due. As Mr. Dictenberg mentioned, we would greatly appreciate your placing this on a Planning Commission agenda as soon as possible. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, HERBERT S. KLEIN, PROFESSIONAL RPORATION Herbert S. Klein HSK/nwt/1536 Enclosures cc: Peter Dictenberg ~ ,too Nicholas [aM1piris, Ph'D' ^ CONSULTING GEOLOGIST ore3VALLEY ROAD oAnoOmDALE.COLORADO 81au3 (303) 963-3600 (24 HOURS) ~. September 28, 1988 Peter Dictenberg 44 West 91st, St. NY, NY, 10024 RE: Lot 15, White Horse Springs Subdivision Dear Mr' Dictenberq: I have completed my geologic investigation, for purposes of HB 1041` of your building site located about three miles northwest of the Town of Aspen in the White Horse Springs Subdivision within the Aspen 7 1/2 minute quadrangle, Pitkin County, Colorado. The 6 and 1/2 acre lot lies near the east boundary of Section 27, T 9 S, R 85 W of the 6th PM. The topography of the property consists of a moderate to steep south -facing hillside covered with scrub oak, sage brush and other shrubs, and native grasses. The Salvation Ditch and an access road cross the lower portion of the lot as shown on the accompanving map. It is my understanding that the proposed building envelope is in the area shown as "approx. location of clearing" on the map, between the road and the ditch. The slopes there are moderate in the 20 to 25% range. These moderate slopes extend all the way to the property boundary below the building envelope and could be incorporated within it, especially if the road can be redesigned. According to the map contours the break in slope to higher percentages is above the 7910 contour line. This is roughly where it was noted to be in the field. The geology of the site consists of silts, sands, cobbles and boulders of Quaternary age outwash deposits of glacier "d" merging with the alluvial fan deposits below the site which came out of Trentaz Gulch. The underlying bedrock of the area cannot be seen in outcrop anywhere near the property but is certainly the Mancos Shale of Cretaceous age fairly deep below the surface. It dips generally to the northeast at about 25 degrees in outcrops along the railroad tracks southwest of the property. There are no faults mapped through the property but the Castle Creek fault zone lies about 1/2 mile to the east. There is no evidence of recent movement along this fault in this area. 77 77'477'� -77777777777-77 There were no noticeable granitic boulders on the hillside above thesite which could potentially be a hazard, but when thehomesite is finalized I suggest that the hillside be searched directly above the proposed home in a fan -shaped area all the way to the top. If any unstable boulders are found they should be rolled down the hill or stabilized prior t/; iniiation of construction. I can be consulted if there ifi situations. are questions on spec c s u . There is only a small chance of boulders being a problem on this site. The hillside above the envelope shows no signs of instability but there is a rather large irrigation ditch just tens of feet above the site which could pose a problem if it were to breach or leak significantly. There are several ways to mitigate potential problems from the ditch but the most effective a.d economical way is to provide positive landscaping around the uphill side of the home so that if breaching occurs all the water is directed effectively well around the home—site. Perimeter drains around the foundation are also very important and should be addressed during the site specific soils engineering study necessary for proper foundation design. Another mitigation which can be used in conjunction with the landscaping is to line or culvert the ditch the home for a length greater than the width of thehome, but depending upon the final topography. Lining .vpnly protect leakage, while culverting will prevent breaching in that area as well. Tf wate� for h�usehold use is not available from the subdivi=ion, a rel atively.shallow well near the homesite should produce adequate water within 150 to200 feet depth. Waste disppsal can be through the use of a standard septic tem and drain field in the permeablesoils of the site sys ith no tentjal for high gnr roud water onear-surface w po 6edrock. The Pitkin County Sanitation Engineer should be consulteD for his specific recommendations. Access to the site can be from either direction on the existing rough road home should be designed to but will need improvemen t . The om prevent the accumulation of radon gas using techniques available to contractors. Sincerely, Consulting Geolog�st '� S � �,e0/'✓! 1/1/97'-�2. G ��.'c P,Et�ti kiT S ��JL f�tJc fl,;u "7q0 5 2 L o z -v [j� G2� / "VS 'SH -.S '-x4465 WASGc� Off/ /Vl-/LL 6 Vo //Vos C. OK /obo -- e s9.vK "i 11/14/88 10116 $ 303 945 7081 STEWART TITLE G 4, c 41AW-w, Z�t e, ol /voz " VIC41V45 A,,�ArZA4�5e /veov M! N 1 AA L, X,% T2 WA�TF.p_ —11,vL IRI-5z5)Q'S, ---7AZC- PA -'',D 7, L-2. PIPc T:7 ----, C 4- %6 -6, 1A 11 X 14 /ArrAr 4 \ \. t?l1%r'.''' .C..,-%�'°i8 '? \ � ` / o �' `•�~ \, � � �J� �1Ci �``� JT 1.: 1V� �.� Gi i i� M11�T IL Mo �� \l \ �GEc �B syr-�� \� \� \ \ \ \ \ ` r. �?�'�vrN f' �t k t/Z 7:1� {°!.`�� F=;�- -r V� a'"Z7 J7, t 0" x 11/2- , < M A /A -7,f4 ZOA C21 -t2j:-lVi�-F I AV vv=- k-1 C- v5 6L. `� � k � � ° �- � - �, moo, � �t�`� ` ! ��\ �� \ \,4 -1041 HAZARD REVIEW MAP C-) T C)cx 'S"ON 0 T 151 B- -ki "J SPRINGS SUBDIV, "I X ��\ ` \ \� \ 6.55 Ac. + j V� X "Co'k \ \i V\ \� \' \ \ v IT, A, -\4 Tti( '41 41 Lor 13 T"MUM770 Applicant acknowledges that he/she has been informed -riy P1,tk1n County of the existertce of '11041 Na -,,"rd Areas" that might Affect the property, any Improvements, and the use and occupancy thereof. APPROVED 1041 HAZARD REVIEW BY DATE: PROPOSED OWNER / APPLICANT: Peter Dicteriberig 0 C-) U 0 -C C CJ (n C, C) tv -cc) v) 0 6. U -C