Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.eh.264335101005 (1990))aai Ie +1 - `�� 5� 0 %� o ASPEN*PITKIN 'r1 ENV6-iONMENTAL HEALTH DEPAI4TMENT� INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT NO. VE OF PERMIT: nitial Construction ( )Emergency Use r installation ( )Use Permit as a result of sale ( )Repair Work,(Pzevious Permit i .) ( )Alterationof an existing system, (Previous Permit 1 ( )Others ISSUED TO:�� Owner �/O C Home Mailing � - � 0,001,6 * 9T Address Agen t# Ma il.in g Address DATE Phone OF ISSUE . / — / ��C� Business Phone q2z' — /W Phone Sewage Disposal System Work to be performed by This permit valid� only for premises location by the following legal descriptions -'Z L01 S I2E / JWATER SUPPLY TAk'l1 tX'i . AVERAGE PERCOLATID�j TF. t4l This Individual Sewage Disposal. Permit is granted with regard to the following use: SfJCL L C Nurabez of: Dodreoms _�_ Lofts 0 Garbage Disposals_ .�-) Dishwashers � Clothes Washers CALCULATED AVERAGE DAILY WASTE LOAD 7 1 Cr GALLONS. THE NATURE OF THE SYSTEM INCLUDED UNDER THIS PER -JIT: Type of Tank or Treatment U/�nits SE '' /q4__ Method of Final Disposals 4p)scr-pTJQ&—7ZclveH� Absorptiop Description (including brand name, if any) of other equipment or appurtnancest Other Conditiong or spccificationst - L ti� C 15- Tank .CaSCJ` _Gallon Hinimum Area __M'-41 Square Feet Minimum STAGES REQUIRING INSPECTION BY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT: //' ( )Before Excavation Upon completion of excavation and prior to placement of gravel " )system ofBefore vabsorptionribio uiidon (� Prior to backfill of any component ( lOther, Specifyi E Plans \and specifications of the proposed sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Perninsi.on is hereby granted to th, owner or his agent to perform the work indicated above in accordance with the Pitkin County Indivi-',ual Sewa;e Disposal RONUlations in effect on the date of issue. In addition to general provisions set forth on tic reverse hcr�-of, this Permit is subject to the following additional terns and conditions: /1 Aspen/Pitkin Environmental APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY(title) health Officer _ The atxrve inM v(dual se'.rago disposal system installed by _ — has bccn in::pcctcd for use by a representative of the Ass:en i'iiS'in-Environrvnta Hca t., Dcp•trtment. The owner anrumoa a'yTl _ rvnponsibiltty in case of failure or inadequacy of thio/ sewage disposal system. Complete as -built drawing attached. DATE O1 FINAL INSPECTION Aspen/Pitkin Environmental U4 j._.1 �TITLE _ Health Officer 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/920-5070 ASPEN*PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT�5 APPLICATION FOR AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL -PERMIT Name of OWNER PHONE a Address of OWNER 27 (lid S-y�� Name of APPLICANT %���/D �_ PHONE `I� PERMIT TO BE: (/,')Picked Up ( )flailed tot TYPE OF PERMIT: MNew Installation ( )Repair ( 3Owner ( )Applicant 1 )Emergency Use ( )Alteration NOT due to failure fACATION OF PROPOSED SYSTEM: Legal Description Lot F Z• { Block ?fling subdivision `3f fie�,Jo ��� Size of Lot i + acres rYPE'OF STRUCTURE:(Atingle Family Dwelling (.)Other: Do you plan any further additions to the residence? ( )YES "NO No. of bedrooms- No: of Automatic Dishwashers � No. of Lofts No. of Garbage Disposals - No. of Automatic Clothes washers )_ KATER SUPPLY: ( )Private well, Depth orpyblic, Name of System ( )Spring ( )Stream or Creek TYPES OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: Field ( )Aeration Plant/Absorption Field ( )Composting Toilet ( )Incineration Toilet ( )Mound plj5eptic Tank/Absorption ( ( )Vault Privy ( )Other: )Recycling, potable use ( )Recycling, other use The'lnitial site inspection must be arranged with the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department (925-2020, 8:30-9:30 a.m.) before a permit can be issued. The individual sewage disposal permit must be issued before a building permit can be obtained. FINAL INSPECTION APPROVAL MUST BE GIVEN BY THE ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO BACKFILLING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. disposal permit is hereby submitted. The undersigned acknowledges that the above information Application for an individual sewage is true and that false inform, n wil i valldaLe the application and any subsequent permit. DATE /0 Signature of Applicant r 3/ i` O (This application becomes. invali 12 the from the above date.) NOTE: PLOT PLAN must be filed with this application. Please locate the following items by measured distances: 1. Property lines and dimensions. 2. Proposed and existing water wells on subject property and adjacent property. 3. Domestic water service lines. {. Proposed and existing buildings, driveways, and other structures. S. Streams, lakes, ponds, irrigation ditches, and other water courses. 6. Proposed and existing individual sewage systems on subject property. , SUBMIT A REVISED PLOT PLAN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IF INSTALLATION IS TO BE CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL PLAN. // acknowledges receipt of this individual sewage disposal perms a plication and a per [ eglin the amount The undeccrsicd hereby 9 , of $_/5 6 " , Receipt Number Date Fee Recclved by Administrative Officer 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/920-5070 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT . oto A7 -e R-e1q_ Carp, 5t(kK vS:X1,Ld APPLICATION FOR AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL -PERMIT tek-13K3 Name of OWNER �=�" eA r i C -L PHONE' Address of OWNER £`)L� i; i��Ay)ti' Name of APPLICANT i c l�c� 4,ck e- -e u� (II PHONE �-6 �ky- S CL VA PERMIT TO BE:Picked Up ( Wailed tot TYPE OF PERMIT: (NNew Installation ( )Repair ' , 1� ( f0wner ( )Applicant . 1 )Emergency use ( )Alteration NOT due to failurE WCATION OF PROPOSED SYSTEM: Legal Description Lot Block Filing Subdivision Size of Lot acres TYPE'OF STRUCTURE: ( )Single Family Dwelling ( )Other: Do you plan any further additions to the residence? ( )YES ( )NO No, of bedrooms ' No. of Lofts No. of Garbage Disposals 6, � No: of Automatic Dishwashers No. of Automatic Clothes Flashers WATER SUPPLY: ( )Private Well, Depth or ()qPublie, Name of System ( )Spring ( )Stream or Creek TYPES OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: X)Septic Tank/Absorption Field ( )Aeration Plant/Absorption Field ( )Composting Toilet ( )Incineration Toilet ( )Mound ( )Recycling, potable use ( )Recycling, other use ( )Vault Privy ( )Other: The initial site inspection must be arranged with the Aspen/Pitkin'Environmental Health Department (925-2020. 8:30-9:30 before a permit can be issued. The individual sewage disposal permit must be Issued before a building permit can be obtained. FIKAL INSPECTION APPROVAL MUST HE GIVEN BY ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO BACKFILLING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. Application for an ind idea e e di sa rmit is hereby submitted. The undersigned acknowledges that the above information is true and that Lala on will in a the application and any subsequent permit: /1 - Signature of Applicant DATE q v This application becomes. invalid 12 nth: from the above date.) NOTE: PLOT PLAN mds-tu be filed with this application. Please locate the following items by measured distances: 1. Property lines and dimensions. 2. Proposed and existing water wells on subject property and adjacent property. 3. Domestic water service lines. <. Proposed and existing buildings, driveways, and other structures. 5. Streams, lakes, ponds, irrigation ditches, and other water .courses. -6. Proposed and existing individual sewage systems on subject property. SUBMIT A REVISED PLOT PLAN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IF INSTALLATION IS TO BE CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL PLAN. The and 1 ned ereby acknowledges receipt of this individual sewage disposal permit application and a permit fee in the amour. or I , Receipt Number Date Fee Received . by Administrativo Officer 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/920-6070 M1 Call PATIO 0 \ 4 F' pls7���r�taN 04) 06) ,/,/2.71w To'C 700' ON 97:8 9619E Ndf 9NIA3kHi'lU3N3aSH Chene—Northern,Inc. SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 29, STAR1400D SUBDIVISION PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO _ o Prepared For: Pardee Development. Attn : Lee' Pardee P.O. Box 4153 Aspen CO 81612-4153 Job No. 4 534 89 October 23, 1989 0 (.mwlwla na'n•(rr}ana $CK"11'575 5080Fuaa GWTIW(KKI Spilus Ccocsaau 8160' 3035:5 745E 303 445.2363 Facs m,Ie TABLE OF CONTENTS CONCLUSIONS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SITE CONDITIONS FIELD EXPLORATION SUBSOIL CONDITIONS FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS FLOOR SLABS UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM SURFACE DRAINAGE PERCOLATION TESTS LIMITATIONS . FIGURE 1 — LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES FIGURE 2 — LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS o FIGURE 3 — LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 4 AND 5 — SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 6 — GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I — SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE II — PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 6 8 8 9 10 CONCLUSIONS The proposed residence should be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils and designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2500 psf. Other design and construction cri- teria relating to geotechnical aspects of the proposed residence are presented in the body of the report. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed resi- dence to be located on Lot 29, Starwood Subdivision, Pitkin County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The study was conducted for the purpose of developing foundation recommendations and in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services letter to Lee Pardee of Pardee Develop- ment, dated September 1, 1989. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was con— ducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Samples obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and labora- tory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing are presented in the report. This report has been prepared to summarize the data obtained during this study and to present our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. Design parameters and a discussion of geotechnical engineering considerations related to construction of the proposed residence are included in the report. ■ 0� V, /1z 2 5 CONSTRUCTION.,�!,,A, PROPOSED At the timeof-outfield ,Ik velo­pm. ke, -n , p1l.ans ,were tentative. The 1 fv- 5W1_M,,1jX below, w, bh3.,a,;.part.ial residence, will and' 0 - proposed V W&T ',the,. d _b slab on grade'£', n- garage,' an likely e, 0 t e,�s or grade area. Ground,4�flo.orw,%�... l ;xruc Grading�,J__ c'et,Ain��ther area s,�,fq�-,,the-w - ipa n, P1 ZIMP structural:�:rzbo ground feet below existing, --cut �:depths,Upi�` e to�:abOu:t*.i8,,to't1 - 2 expected.to,,Anvolve,'� 'the' -loadings 9.,,rWical! Pf," "light,-* o ation ace.-.- We. -assume. :rej�atively.�j�,, und . i� surfkz ­,:­ " - '11 M , _., J! 7f ;Trt'i pq ion' P ype' proposed construct prop -Y better plans -have been location and.f,%g��Oing�_- Oc When building �r,19_adings,, ed� in jathe,recommendations contain, -.,reevaluat defined .,we shouldibe,.notified;.to ae this report. SITE CONDITIONS;` sloping steep', p�o esterly,,,lfacing��pnd,.,modelrately,- The site is - located on a:., w -moder, d.condition'.. j,I'A o- b e'-. i n,'l native7lori undisturbe that 1. , 1. - . t". -r- , :appeared t ts hillside ish_covers4 hp�� tl- Aot '::n weeds brush;; scrub Oak ,,.Of., ely dense'_:growthspen ;at - .;­ thet;en tentative bu, di4p Elevation difference i0�toI5�sv1V indicated bythe --cont oursN site The grade of, theshown� building area O � A Fig.ik k1' tA '24, ... ... M -, .1 N� ��k FIELDI ON EXPLOUT 0 , n- for -September.slOj qwas,,-.conducted,�, on t e Aproject�' The field. explo 0 F' �shown led.atthe locations., 19'. 89. :Three explor*atory.,-borings,Mere dril .19 were,,advanced.wi.th tions, .,,The, boring1s,..4z F to evaluate,the.subsurface-.condi powered.,.., by P. trUck-mounted CME 55, diameter continuous flight, augers, with: a:6 -inch diameter auger:desig,, n rig. Three,percolatiO�holes,,weredrilled l�r -3- nated P-1, P-2 and P-3 at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The borings were logged by a representative of Chen -Northern, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1 3/8 -inch and 2 -inch I.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSOIL CONDITIONS The subsoil conditions encountered at the site are shown graphically on Fig. 2. The subsoils consist of about 1 1/2 feet of topsoil overlying medium dense, silty to very clayey sands and gravels. The deposit contained cobbles and within Hole 1 transitioned to cobbles and boulders. Drilling in the coarse material with auger equipment was difficult and drilling refusal was encountered in Hole 1 at 15 1/2 feet. Finer sand and silt zones were encoun- tered throughout the subsoils. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included moisture content, dry density, andv gradation analysis. Swell - consolidation tests were conducted on the finer grained soils with the results shown on Figs. 4 and 5. The tests indicate that these soils possess a minor to low swell potential when subjected to wetting under light load and a moder- ate compressibility under increased load. One of the sandier samples com- pressed moderately upon loading and wetting. Results of gradation analysis -4- performed on a small diameter drive sample (minus 1 1/2 -inch fraction) of the natural coarse granular soils are shown on Fig. 6. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils. The expansion potential appears to be limited to the clayey portions of the subsoils which were encountered infrequently throughout the subsoil profiles. Our experience in this area of Starwood indicates that settlement of shallow foundations due to wetting of the subsoils is more of a concern thatn expansion potential. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. The construction criteria should be considered when preparing project documents. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural subsoils should be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2500 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or - less. Some additional movement could occur if the bearing soils were to become wet. 2) All existing fill, topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the natural undis- turbed subsoils. 3) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. �i r 4) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protec- tion. Placement of foundations at least 42 inches below exterior grade _ is typically used in this area. 5) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 6) A representative of the soil engineer should observe all footing excava- tions prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight„of 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which can be expected to deflect sufficiently to'mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropri- ate surcharge pressures such as adjacent buildings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of -6- �" water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materi- als and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coeffi- cient of friction of 0.40. Passive pressure against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid''unit weight of 350 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particu- larly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be a granular material compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. We recommend on-site granular soils for backfilling foundation walls and retaining structures because their use results in lower lateral earth pres- sures. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to between 9% and 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on .the walls. Settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected even if the fill is placed D properly. FLOOR SLABS Some of the on-site soils possess a swell potential and there is a risk of some slab heave if the subgrade soils were to become wet. Slab -on -grade construction may be used provided the risk of distress is understood by the owner. Based on the laboratory test results and our experience in the area, the risk of slab heave appears low. A positive way to reduce the risk of slab movement, which is commonly used in the area, is to construct structurally supported floors over crawl space. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, nonstructural floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls, columns and partition walls with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Interior non-bearing partitions resting on floor slabs should be provided with slip joints at the bottom of the wall so that, if the slab moves, the movement cannot be transmitted to the upper structure. This detail is also important for wallboards, stairways and door frames. Slip joints which will allow at least 1 inch of vertical movement are recommended. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. We suggest joints be provided on the order of 15 feet on center. Slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4-inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed immedi- ately beneath basement level slabs-on-grade. This material should consist of minus 2-inch aggregate with less than 50b passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2� passing the No. 200 sieve. The free-draining gravel will aid in drainage below the slabs and should be connected to the underdrain system. Required fill beneath slabs can consist of the on-site granular soils or a suitable imported,granular material, excluding topsoil and oversized rocks. The fill should be spread in thin horizontal lifts, adjusted to near optimum moisture content, and compacted to 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. All vegetation, topsoil and loose or disturbed soil should be removed prior to fill placement. -U- The above recommendations will not prevent slab heave if the expansive soils underlying slabs -on -grade become wet. However, the recommendations will reduce the effects if slab heave occurs. All plumbing lines should be pres- sure tested before backfilling to help reduce the potential for wetting. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater may develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawl space and basement areas be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drain tile placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular mate - Tial. The drain should be placed at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 2 feet deep. An impervious liner such as 20 mil PVC should be placed in a trough shape beneath the drain gravel and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: i —9- 0 J 1) Excessive wetting or drying of soils in the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard .Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. 14) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. PERCOLATION TESTS Three percolation tests were performed in holes drilled at locations designated by the prefix "P" on Fig. 1. The subsoil profiles encountered in the percolation holes were similar to that of the nearby exploratory borings. No free water was encountered to the maximum drill depth of 3 112 feet. The results of the percolation tests are presented in Table II and indicate a final percolation rate of 30 minutes per inch. Based on the suDsul'1 dc:c Y, files encountered at the site and the percolation test results, the site appears acceptable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. The septic disposal system should be designed by a civil engineer and include additional percolation tests performed at the design system location and elevation. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices in this area for use by the client for design purposes. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and the proposed type of construction. The nature and extent of subsurface variations across the site may not become evident until excavation is performed. If during construction, fill, soil, rock or water conditions appear to be different from those described herein, this office should be advised at once so reevaluation of the recommendations may be made. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the soil engineer. SLP/ec Very truly yours, CHEN-NORTHERN, INC. By Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. Reviewed By Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. O S o P-3 LOT R-29 BUILDING SITE APPROXIMATE SCALE I" = 200' 0 P-2 \00 ++° do ® HOLE 3 eP-I q° a HOLE I 1 4 \ \ \ \� \\ HOLE 2 \ CONTROL \ \ \ \ ` 11,0 POINT t \ \ 1 APPROXIMATE SCALE 4 0' \ foo Il° .�o LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 4 534 69 w110-11 �Northcrillif1C. AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES 1 ,f{ ` Hole 1 Mule 2 Elev. = 110' Elev. = 101, 110 Mule 3 Elev. = 97' 80 Note:. Explanation of symbols presented on Fig. 3. 110 105 100 4-J w 95 ro a� w 90 85 Northern, Inc. bogs of' Exp 1 or'll ury Borings Fig. 2 20/12 WC= 14.0 DD=98.7 -200=63 30/12 105 WC=9.7 -;: DD=97.0 .Qo' o• 100 °0 40/12 .7 6/6,S/1 58112 IVC=7. 0 o: DD= 118.0 95 o. -200=44 .o r 32/12 a� IVC=7.8 w 85/12 -200=48 90 •:o 'O 32/12 IVC=4. 9 :Q +200528 85 a o. 0 36/12 0 80 Note:. Explanation of symbols presented on Fig. 3. 110 105 100 4-J w 95 ro a� w 90 85 Northern, Inc. bogs of' Exp 1 or'll ury Borings Fig. 2 #; LEGEND ® Topsoil; organic gravelly silts. .. Silty to Clayey Sands (SC -SM); gravelly with a few cobbles, medium dense, slightly moist, red, low plasticity fines. I . Sand Gravel (SC -GM); very clayey to silty with cobbles and rock fragments, medium Odense, slightly moist, red, slightly calcareous, pussible boulders, low plasticity fines. M. Gravel, Cobbles, Boulders.(GM); silty, dense, slightly moist, brown. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2 -inch I.U. California liner sample. p Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 -inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. 20/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 20 blows of a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. TPractical rig refusal. NOTES: l.. Exploratory borings were drilled on September 16, 1989 with a 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by taping from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory.boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. 'i'lie lines between materials shown on the exp Puratory boring lugs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory 'resting Results: WC = Water Content (o) DD = Dry Density (pcf) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 4 534 81) I Chen=NOrlhern,InC. I Legend and Notes I Fig. 3 0 r_ 0 •, .1 1 V) a� rte, 0 2 U 3 4 5 6 o\- 0 0 Moisture Content = 14.0 percent Dry Unit Weight = 98.7 pct Sample of: sandy clay From: Hole 1 at 2 feet aniioln l delrl constaht 0.1 1.0 lu ivu APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 0.1 I .0 i V vv APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 4 53d 89 1 Chen -Northern, Inc. I SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig_ 4 Moisture Content = 9.7 percent Dry Unit Weight = 97.0 pcf Sample of: clayey sand From: Hole 1 at 4 feet Ad i ional constInt omp vre es_ io sure 1 d to wetting A 0.1 I .0 i V vv APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 4 53d 89 1 Chen -Northern, Inc. I SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig_ 4 a\O Moisture Content = 7.0 percent Dry Unit Weight = 118.0 pct sampie of: . clayey sand From: 11ole 2 at 4 feet 'Ex ansi n un L co stan re s Ie du to et i g All I 1 t0 100 0.1 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf ST RESULTS Fig. 5 4 534 89 Chen -Northern, Inc. SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TE Chen -Northern, Inc. T A B L E SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 4 534 89 SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT l°�) NATURAL DRY DENSITY lP�i) GRADATION PERCENT PASSING NO 200 SIEVE ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSI) SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE HOLE DEPTH (feep GRAVEL ( _) SAND (°a) LIOUI0 LIMIT (%) PLASTICITY INDEX �) 1 2 14.0 98.7 63 sandy clay 4 9.7 97.0 clayey sand 2 4 7.0 118.0 44 clayey sand 14 4.9 35 37 28 clayey sand & gravel 3 4 7.8 48 clayey sand J a On TABLE II PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS W Job No. 4 534 89 WATER DEPTH WATER DEPTH ROLE HOLE LENGTH OF AT START AT END DROP IN AVERAGE NO. DEPTH INTERVAL OF INTERVAL OF INTERVAL WATER LEVEL PERCOLATION RATE (In.) (Min.) (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) (Min./Inch.) P-1 3'' S" 15 1' 6" 1' 3" 3" 15 1' 3" 1' 1 1/211 1 1/2" 15 1' 1 1/2" 1' 1/2" 1" 15 1' 1/2" 11 1/21- /2"15 is 11 1/2" 11" 1/2" 15 11" 10 1/2" 1/2" 15 10 1/2" 9 1/2" 1" 15 9 1/2" 9" 1/2" 15 9" 8 1/2" 1/2" 15 8 1/2" 8" 1/2" 30 P-2 3' 2" 15 1' 8 1/2" 1' 3 1/2" 5" 15 i' 3 1/2" 1' 1 1/2" 2" 15 1' 1 1/2" 1' 1 1/2" 15 1' 11" 1" 15 11" 10" 1" 15 10" 9" 1" 15 911 811 1" 15 8" 7 1/2" 1/2" 15 7 1/2" 7" 1/2" 30 P-3 3' 6" 15 1' 9 1/2" 1' 4„ 5 1/2" 15 1' 4" 11 1" 3" 15 1' 1" 11" 2" 15 11" 911 2f' 15 911 8 1/211 1/211 15 8 1/211. 7 1/2" 1" 15 7 1/2" 6 1/2" 1" 15 6 1/2 6" .. 1/21 15 6" 5 1/2" 1/2" 15 S 1/2" S.. 1/2" 30 Minimum Eltective Uquid I - N of Bedrooms Tank Capacity (gallons) II 1116 1 or less 750 1000- 31250 . Each additional bedroom 250 � ':�z D Table 4 Maximum Loading Elates of Effluent Volume for Soil Absorption Systems Percolation Rale (minutes/(nchl Soil class yP.a.ah �`^• •�^•"•" (Appendix 2) ...__...._..' –_--...� "-" (g.L/agJtJday) ---_ 0 -to I Sand 1.30 11.20 11 Sandy loam to loam .72 21-30 III loam - _ _ -- _ ,50 31.40 / V loam to Silly loam .40 41.60 V Clay loam .30 Over 60 VI Clay .20 i 'Minimum er numbo1 bed •+ rpbms is 10 (21- 1Absotption atea tpt seepage pets is tigured as cf(e 6. sidehvaa area beneath the Wet `Unsuilabte lot seepage piu if percolation rate is over tniriy (301 -k.Aes Per intik •Unsuitabte lot seepage beds it perc(Aation rate it ova one inch (1-1 In thirty (30) ""AIM `U"MAtabte for eon-ntt—1 absorption systems. = l 5 7a) „ , tins �7�0� • ser /I _ ?�q 0 9 sq• -4 . 56" - lIQ 5 -59,4 . rah.ltlt 14- V, J/oS" V or Etta A Table )- Required Square Footage of Required Soil Absorption Systems -- ReQulred Bottom —' Required Bottom C Absorption Area In sq. It Absorpllon Area M eq. It Required Sidew011 Aro.• 1. Per Bedroom' lot Pct Bedroom' for In eq. It. per Bedroom' lot I• Sell class Sl.ndatd Trenches Seepage Beds Seepage Pits P 1 165 - 215 165 i U 300 400 335 I II1 440 57S 460 ' IV 550 V 740 VI ` s 'Minimum er numbo1 bed •+ rpbms is 10 (21- 1Absotption atea tpt seepage pets is tigured as cf(e 6. sidehvaa area beneath the Wet `Unsuilabte lot seepage piu if percolation rate is over tniriy (301 -k.Aes Per intik •Unsuitabte lot seepage beds it perc(Aation rate it ova one inch (1-1 In thirty (30) ""AIM `U"MAtabte for eon-ntt—1 absorption systems. = l 5 7a) „ , tins �7�0� • ser /I _ ?�q 0 9 sq• -4 . 56" - lIQ 5 -59,4 . rah.ltlt 14- V, J/oS" V or Etta A .s, lw4 "7-4 -9 i 9 inted o^.Recycled Paper ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMEN IAL Ht=ALI n PENT FOR FIREPLACE OR STO' Name of owner of property _ Owner's Mailing Address Street Address of Property — Legal Description of Property vcez\ ev lam- iW al � ,.lk4 �D u,A Gar,j e �v�qt � �}a.+'WOOCI Parcel ID# of Property 4UA 3 - 3S I _0I � O� Tax Schedule # of Property Structure type: Single Family Duplex Condo -Q Apt= - - Commercial/Office F� Other Check one: New Construction 0 Remodel 0 NUMBER & TYPES OF DEVICES YOU PLAN TO INSTALL: # OF CERTIFIED WOODSTOVES L2 MAYE, MODEL # ROOM CATALYST? # OF FIRE ,LA ES W/ GAS LOGS -1 ROOM(S) I - • 2 b # OF DECORATIVE NATCTRAL G FIRE PLACE APPLIANCES W / 4" OR 5" CLASS VENT MAKE, MODEL # �' a G 'p t,'t v ROOMS) t a �-1 -- # OF WOODBURNING FIREPLACES_ ROOM DOES THE FIREPLACE HAVE AN INSERT? (yes /no) TYPE # OTHER DEVICES 'E ROOMS) If gas logs or a gas appliance are being ins quires proof that the gas log or a e i. AGA and the manufacturer - Signature of applican 3)59 Fr+virnnmPntal Health a artment NUMBER & TYPES OF DEVICES YOU AL- READY HAVE # OF CERTIFIED WOODSTOVES MAH MODEL # ROOM CATALYST? # OF FIREPLACES W /GAS LOGS -1)_ ROOM(S) OGS1 ROOM(S) # OF DECORATIVE NATURAL GAS FI 5" PLACE APPLIANCES (WITH CLASS B VENTS MAKE, MODEL # ROOM(S) # OF WOODBURNING FIREPLACES ROOM(S) DOES THE FIREPLACE CONTAIN AN INSERT? TYPE # OF OTHER DEVICES TYPE l ' a bedroom, the Building Department re - r v for installation in a bedroom by UL or ate 1 Rv wal 'Date 9 a�... 0 City of Aspen/Pitkin County - Fire Place Permits Function [PRINT ] Tax Sched: 0- 3921 Owner Name: R-29 STARWOOD CORP. Address 207 S ORIGINAL CURVE Date: 09-NOV-90 Address 2 207 S ORIGINAL CURVE City State: ASPEN, CO Zip: 81611 Even Address: E Parcel Id: 264335101005 Legal: STARWOOD Applicant Name: R-29 STARWOOD CORPORATION Street Num: 0 Street Name: Structure Type: SF Description: Comments: #789 2GL IN LIVING & DINING RMS How Many Fire Places: 0 How Many Gas Log Fireplaces: 2 How Many Inserts: 0 Insert Info: Catalyst: How Many Wood Stoves: 0 Wood Stove Info: Catalyst: How Many Coal Devices: 0 Gas Appliances: 4 Other Devices: 0 Type of Other Devices: Certified Stove: Abort Help Refrsh Printed on Recycled Paper ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PE..MIT FOR FIREPLACE OR S1 ✓E Name of owner of property /C -Z-` ��,ri,✓aac� �� r���'` f��r Owner's Mailing Address zc, 7 4 ��-� �� �'� �° •oE Street Address of Property Legal Description of Property Parcel ID# of Property aLa43 -35/ 'C3 jS Tax Schedule # of Property 391A l 4a_ Structure a - Structure type: Single Family l Duplex = Condo 0 Apt= Commercial/Office = = Other Check one: New Construction El Remodel NUMBER & TYPES OF DEVICES YOU PLAN TO INSTALL: # OF CERTIFIED WOODSTOVES -'^? MAKE, MODEL # ROOM CATALYST? n # OF FIREPLACES W/ GAS LOGS ROOMS) � 5r-( bir�/1W'2 # OF DECORATIVE NATURAL GAS FIRE PLACE APPLIANCES W / 4" OR 5" CLASS B VENT MAKE, MODEL # ROOKS) u ,�� �Av���� 4 �,2dd,41+- # OF WOODBURNING FIREPLACES C� ROOM DOES THE FIREPLACE HAVE AN INSERT? r (yes/no) TYPE # OTHER DEVICES ROOM(S) TYPE NUMBER & TYPES OF DEVICES YOU AL- READY HAVE # OF CERTIFIED WOODSTOVES MAKE, MODEL # ROOM CATALYST? # OF FIREPLACES W/GAS LOGS ROOM(S) # OF DECORATIVE NATURAL GAS FIRE- PLACE APPLIANCES (WITH 4" 5" CLASS B VENT) MAKE, MODEL # ROOMS) # OF WOODBURNING FIREPLACES ROOM(S) DOES THE FIREPLACE CONTAIN AN INSERT? TYPE # OF OTHER DEVICES ROOMS) TYPE If gas logs or a gas appliance are being installed in a bedroom, the Building Department re- quires proof that the gas log or appliance is approved for installation in a bedroom by UL or AGA and the manufacturer. Y f `L� g Signature of applicant �%" (� ' �`�J ate 789 1ti Environmental Health Department pproval Date P ZONING CHECKLIST Owner's Name ��,© n —41 e&- :cA—_ Permit # c " 3q 7 Contact Person 70 Date Received IL R Address Legal Description 1� " o? t a R xx��c Access Permit #92-- C VC) Existing Residence ❑ 1041: ❑ Minor ResolutionIb PlatMapSods Page C3 Wildlife C3Wildfire ❑ Flood Plain ❑ Slopes ❑ Geologic ❑ Ridge Line ❑ Scenic Overla- BOA # ❑ Denied Cl Approved Other EDU: 'N/A Meso No. Deed Restriction: Book Page Topo / Survey: Date Y, -f` // 1911 Job #F9 �-3-3 ❑ Schmuesser ❑ dines in Space ❑ Aspen Survey Engineers ❑ Scarrow ❑ Alpine Surveys ❑ Other: Type Work XJ f &J Type Unit 5 Allowed Proposed Floor Area� � O Existing Height -,ZS 'rY- Setbacks Front 100 lso t Side 10 0 t 11 � 0' Rear 30 /O o r ❑ Within Approved Bldg. EnvJOutside All Setbacks ❑ Check Resolution at CO for conditions ❑ No Conditions to be checked at CO Lot Size Zoningf", Approved # of Bedrooms 5 Floor Area Plans Cert. of Occupancy Description: # Levels Foyer _L Garage: Attach ` `> Detach Carport DeckL Kitchen L Dining _� Living _I Family Bedrooms 5 Library �_ OfcJStudy 1— Media Room _ Exercise �_ Solarium/Greenhse Laundry.,(_ Mud Mech.__�_ Storage s c 5:_ Attic Other: Ab e,cr� akiL u A am , Over: Yes No _