The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.eh.264335104001 (1999)A As /Pitkin Environmental Health Dep Per�..n for an Individual Sewage Disposa 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 816 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-51 E Permit # 99018 Parcel ID # 2643-351-04-001 Type of permit New( X) Repair( ) Addition to House( ) Name of Owner Kurt & Dale Holli Street Address 0210 Johnson Drive, Starwood Property legal description R-32 Starwood Size of lot Total square footage of the house 6449 Water source Starwood Water District # of bedrooms in house 5 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house Caretaker unit Total square footage of the caretaker unit # of bedrooms in caretaker unit # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in caretaker unit Designed for what # rooms (list) 4 bedrooms + 1 office/maid room = 5 total Designed by Mailing Address Perc rate 22 Septic tank capacity Permit information Church & Associates, Inc. 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard, Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Profile hole depth :?844 8" Depth to groundwater or bedrock +8" Absorption area 2275` Comments The engineer design and specifications dated February 19, 1999 and letter dated February 19, 1999 with revised Figures 1 & 2 are to be followed. The design is for two 2,000 gallon single compartment concrete septic tanks with a pump and 112 units of gravelless chambers. Permit approved by:Mposal Date: C_ Plans and specifications of the pro sed individual sesystem have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -built drawings must be included with this ermit before the final approval will be issued. Installer: _ Final inspection approval: d/ y -7 Date: _/ ao V It r,� n� m 1 �^ .1Q � i�:'�'r'1f?, G�. HEALTH 4AJAM 920 5�� .�3-J.�-„ GHJ 0 ASPEMPITKIN _,24%IRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARV yawl APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYE � EM 130 S. Galena St., Aspen Colorado E161' Phone 970-920-5070!p x 970-920-5039 Name of OWNER ��-U k'_ T i7/�I •� i ��-�i iVL i t✓ �,ees Mailing Address �x ` 17 tZfZ2 av,P;Hess Phone: ,. 2 Home F4*Cne• AGE Primary Contact Person (all communivation regarding this permit will go through this person) Name \10 LA tN 3 Company r Contact Malting Andress �� 'Ju C Caii Phone: 6P ' U Fax- C{2 Percal lD a{avaibl lae }ram assessorffi s oce _ C 'Q at 920.51613or at www aspgn.eamtassessorif 3 3 T — Street address of property fYLl C )rJN I S Leaai peacription: Lot �_? 1 7 L' ,Block Filing ,Subdivision i Size of lot: acres. Type of proposed Str cl!UM Size of bldg, envelope: Total square feet of house (/i4 # of bedmor-rs in house !2 # of offcen. !bfts & similar sited Monts in hoUse (IN A'�t; Yt✓ Caretaker Unit. Amc hed (* Detached ( �A ) T, otgl areac"sq. ft.) of caretaker unit t 9 #A of offices, lgft and similar s¢e rooms of caretaker unt permit is for: New Home Repair due to failure Water Private weal ( ) Spring ( } Water -Stream ; ) tem Flame of 3YSt&m SiL�TzWCOl7 If Aamodai/AdcGtion ( ) Emergency use { ) Camrrunity/publiC Water systmrn C/ The fen for a 1SOS 9pplication is 5330 For a permit that takes 6 hours or less for the department to approve. If approval takes l6nger than 5 hours, a rate of $55 per hourwiil be chafged. The r ta)dmum fee is $1000. The basic fee of $333 is due at %Me time cf 2ppligli4n_ The remainder, if any, will be due in MO s#2ges_ f-ifst, at the lime of issuance of the ISCS permit: se=nd_ before final approval of the t50S permit, Applicallon for an Individual aewzge disposal system is herto )Y U&m!twd. I hereby certify that the at?Pve inff walls. atiur? i$ true and mur accurate and that I have provided M16 and 3ceur3 inftxrnaticn Cr tet tions Qf aa existing and .ro0 osed intervals, auZdlnps, promerty lines. edches, siopes, waterltnes, sprftz. auction or irrig�Cn lines, drinking water cisierrrs, dr�i>•+ 5las, irrigation ditches, lakes. water coursers, strearrs. flaeeplains, dry guichea, and existing septi;, systems. l hereby certify twat any such fwbmes not shown on attached site map are not Graeant. Issuance of the parmit does nat imply the approval o, any eater permit required for mnsbruction pursuant to Pitkin C,ounN Codes. No cons=ction tray be undertak0tt Ontll 311 tLpptov9ls and permits have been obtained. The Aspen/Pitkin Fnvironnlental Health Department, Pitkin County and ernpoyees of these agencies will be held harrnicss should the individual Sewage disposal systern fail or mat%mction. The Permit to ronstnli�*_ ,s issued on irformatia-r subminad by the oppfrcant or hislher representetives- The owner assurnes full respoat ittty in case of fsiiuce of thrr system, Signature orf applicant L Date ._j, W Receive,! by 16/_� eve Gtr tti Receipt # G `I Data -'53 Gi d 03/04/99 10:27 T}[/RX NO. 5348 P.003 amok ASPEN/PTTKIN ENV ONMENTAL HEALTH DEPART NT : ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS L 5 iLb 2 i iy% L .J Owner's Name HOLLINGER Parcel ID # �iyl�li�ii,�r� Gis`i'Z� i iC7t ii ASPeN f PiTK1N House Sizes . ft. >_ 0 . (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 130 Number of Bedrooms in Main House S' Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main Houset7 '- Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit 0j (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow 1300 State Review Required? No ........................ Perc Rate 22; (T) Design Flow (Q) = # potential bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 2275 Absorptiot Area (A= Q/5 X SQRT) A = 2134 sq. ft. of absorption area required 138 infiltrator units without reduction A maximum 30% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system, only if the lot size and soil conditions are optimal. If a reduction is being proposed, describe why lot size and soil conditions are optimal: 20% REDUCTION WITH THE USE OF CHAMBERS OPTIMAL SOIL CONDITIONS PLUS USE OF PUMP FOR DOSING A = 1705 sq.ft. with reduction 110 infiltrator units with reduction Type of system: []Absorption trenches [X]Absorption bed 0 Graveness chambers []Dry well []Seepage Pit []Other DRIP IRRIGATION Minimum tank capacity 2844 gallons SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = NO WELL SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet = N/A SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet= N/A FINAL INSPECTION BY: DATE: 00%. ..•. `moo, Engineer's Submittal for Septic Permit in Pitkin County Owner's Last Name: HOLLINGER Location: STARWOOD VILLAGE BUTTERMILK Summary of information regarding new septic system: Type of system being proposed: SEPTIC TANK AND ABSORPTION BED Other treatment processes being used: NONE Does the system use any mechanical parts? (Prohibited unless there is no alternative)YES If yes, explain why there are no alternatives A PUMP IS PROPOSED TO DOSE DRAIN FIELD Does the system require any maintenance other than routine pumping? YES If yes, who will do the maintenance? CLEAN B1OTUBE VAULT WHEN SEPTIC TANK IS PUMPED Are any reductions being proposed? YES 20% If yes, what makes the lot and soil conditions optimal? Which of the following are on the site or within setbacks? Closest distance of septic system to each feature [] 100 year floodplain N/A [] well(s) N/A [] irrigation ditches N/A [] streams N/A [] ponds N/A [] other features N/A What was the profile hole depth? N A' What is the depth to groundwater? N/A What is the depth to bedrock? NL What assumptions, if any, were made in system sizing and design? (Include any local, site- specific data, such as months without snow cover, ratio of evaporation to absorption, etc. that are relevant.) THE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS WERE SIMILAR TO TH-2. A TEST IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO APHED SITE VISIT. If there are any variations from normal design, please explain how they can be demonstrated to improve treatment and protect water quality. NONE 0 ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT ISDS DESIGN REQUIREMENTS -DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Name HOLLINGER House Size 6,000 (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 130 #of Bedrooms, Similar Rooms accessible to baths in Main Residence 5 # of Bedrooms, similar rooms w/ access to bath in ATTACHED caretaker # of Bedrooms & Similar Rooms w/ access to baths in DETTACHED caretaker Average Daily Waste Flow 750 # bedrooms X 2 people/br X 75 State Review Required? no Perc Rate 22 (T) 3 equals # of Perc Holes Required Design Flo w (Q) = # bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 2275 Minimum tank capacity 2844 gallons Absorption Area (A= 0/5 X SQRT) A = 2134 sq. ft. of absorption area required 138 infiltrator units without reduction A maximum 30% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system. 14544q.ft. with reduction / 96i9fltrator units with reduction AREA NEEDED FOR STANDARD ABSORPTION TRENCHES 711 2134 Total sq ft /3 =lineal ft of trench needed 12 711 lineal ft/assumed trench length of 60ft = # of 60ft trenches needed 11 # trenches minus 1 = rows of 6ft wide undisturbed soil between trenches 36 12 times 3 = total width of of 60" long field needed for just the trenches 66 11 times 6' = total width of 60' long field needed just for undisturbed soil 102 width of trench +width of undisturbed soil = total width needed 102 by 60 ft is the area needed for a standard absorption field in a trench configuration with no reductions taken and ASSUMING AN AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE OF 22 SLOWER PERCOLATING SOILS WOULD REQUIRE MORE AREA. SETBACK FROM WELL SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet = 202 # of feet = 152 SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = 127 Remember: 8 feet of additional distance for each 100 gallons/day of design flow over 1,000 gallons/day should be added unless an RPE can verify that it is not necessary to prevent contamination. 1/20/99 Printed on Recycled Paper 0 CHURCH Associates, ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS February 19, 1999 Mr. and Mrs. Kurt Hollinger 408 Aspen Airport Business Center, Suite 222 Aspen, Colorado 81611-3508 Subject: OWS Design, Proposed Residence Lot R-32, Starwood Village Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 10708 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Hollinger, i�lr757 -;T T� 17 APR 2 1999 �I.NVIRCINMENTA! HEA' Ii A%ppN / PITKIN As requested by Nancy MacKenzie of the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department (APEHD), we visited the subject site on April 19, 1999 to evaluate a profile pit to confirm our onsite wastewater system (OWS) design for the proposed residence. Subsurface conditions were investigated by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical Inc. and reported under their Job No. 198256, Dated September 11, 1998. The lot is located in a rural residential area in Pitkin County, Colorado. The proposed drain field area has a moderate slope of 14% to 18%. There is a moderate cover of grasses and scrub oak in the proposed field area. The test pit was excavated to approximately 8 feet and had 6 inches of sandy topsoil underlain to the maximum depth explored of 8 feet by clayey, silty, gravelly sand. All recommendations in our original report, dated February 19, 1999, should be followed. If there are any questions or if we can be of further service, please call. Sincerely, CHURCH & J Edward G.—Ch A.R3-1' EOC/trp ,,SsioNP�- 2 copies sent 2 copy to Design By David Panico Inc 1533 Juniper Hill Road Aspen, CO 81611 copy to Pitkin County Environmental Health, ATTN: Nancy MacKenzie DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 I.AJ 1 Lt NUL r\ auJ.00v.+000 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 3.314 ACRES LOT 32, STAR SOD VILLAGE PITKIN COUNT t, COLORADO JOB NO. 10 4� 0 .R.EPRQaM`RESlDE 000 SQUARE FEEIP�* 3 F err FO. UR S. -TAN ' DAR'i) 8 rrr BEDS rrrr rr BED'' WE ......... ....................................... DISTRIBUTION -.BOX-- WITH-` . ......IZERS ............. P-1 P-2 rr BETWEEN BEDS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROFILE PIT 30' A PVC PIPE WITH //CLEANOUT BETWEEN TANK AND RESIDENCE TWO 2000 GALLON SINGLE PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS WITH PUMP IN ._.____l`tiOTUBE VAULT IN SECOND TANK "4" SCHEDULE 35 PERFORATED 4" SCHEDULE 35 PVC PVC PIPE HUNG ACCORDING TO OBSERVATION/VENT PIPE MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS (PIPE INSTALLED LEVEL) TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION - N.T.S. 4' MAX 4" SCHEDULE 35 PVC ---OBSERVATION/VENT PIPE „� -- WITH CAP r --BACKFILL 1.5''MIN. U MIN: EXTENT OF EXCAVATIO UALULILA I IUNS ANU 5h'tC;it IC;A I IUNS DESIGN CRITERIA STRUCTURE - 5 BEDROOMS, >6000 SF LOADING - 130 GAL/DAY/PERSON TOTAL LOADING - 1300 GPD PERCOLATION TEST - 22 MPI AREA - (1.75 X Q X -4T)/5 AREA - 2275 SF REDUCTION FOR USE OF CHAMBERS - 20% TOTAL AREA - 1736 SF FOUR TOTAL BEDS GRAVELLESS CHAMBER 3' BY 6.25' 4" SCHEDULE 35 PERFORATED PVC PIPE HUNG ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS S� 0�'E Fri BED SPECIFICATIONS NUMBER OF BEDS - 4 LENGTH OF EACH BED - 87.5 FEET, 14 CHAMBERS WIDTH OF EACH BED - 6 FEET, 2 CHAMBERS TOTAL NUMBER OF CHAMBERS - 112 CHAMBERS TOTAL AREA - 1736 SF DRAIN FIELD DETAILS TYPICAL DISTRIBUTION BOX - N.T.S. NE -----3' APPRCX. PLAN VIEW z m BAFFLE -4 (OPTIONAL) 1' APPROX. OUTLET CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION BOX OR EQUIVALENT 4" SCHEDULE 35 PVC PIPE f--1 N LET INLET OUTLET VIEW VIEW * MINIMUM OF Fl�R OUTLETS NEEDED TREATMENT UNIT SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CAPACITY - 1.75 X Q X (30 HOURS/24 HOURS) = 2844 GALLONS RECOMMENDATION - TWO 2000 GALLON SINGLE COMPARTMENT PRE -CAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS WITH A PUMP IN A BIOTUBE VAULT IN SECOND TANK 'FIGURE 2 , N " TO 8" 1.5' APPROX. -OUTLET 1' APPROX. INLET OUTLET VIEW VIEW * MINIMUM OF Fl�R OUTLETS NEEDED TREATMENT UNIT SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CAPACITY - 1.75 X Q X (30 HOURS/24 HOURS) = 2844 GALLONS RECOMMENDATION - TWO 2000 GALLON SINGLE COMPARTMENT PRE -CAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS WITH A PUMP IN A BIOTUBE VAULT IN SECOND TANK 'FIGURE 2 , N CHURCH & Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS February 19, 1999 Mr. and Mrs. Kurt Hollinger 408 Aspen Airport Business Center, Suite 222 Aspen, Colorado 81611-3508 Subject: OWS Design, Proposed Residence Lot R-32, Starwood Village Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. .0708 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Hollinger, As requested, we have evaluated subsurface conditions at the site and designed an onsite wastewater system (OWS) for the proposed residence. Subsurface conditions were investigated by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical Inc. and reported under their Job No. 198256, Dated September 11, 1998. SITE CONDITIONS - The lot is located in a rural residential area in Pitkin County, Colorado. The proposed drain field area has a moderate slope of 14% to 18%. There is a moderate cover of grasses and scrub oak in the proposed field area. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - A five -bedroom residence greater than 6000 square feet (SF) in area and is proposed at the location presented in Figure 1. The average sewage loading for a five -bedroom residence is 1300 gallons per day (GPD) using Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department (APEHD) Q loading of 130 gallons per day per person. The sewage loading with a peaking factor of 1.75 is 2275 GPD. This loading includes a dishwasher, garbage grinder, and washing machine. The residence will be served by city water. A pool is proposed at the southwest corner of the residence, which should be located 25+ feet from the drain field. SUBSURFACE CONDPTIONS - A subsurface investi ation was erformed b He worth-Pawlak g P y p Geotechnical, Inc. by digging 4 percolation holes, 26 to 30 inches deep at the locations indicated on Figure 1. A profile boring was not drilled in the septic area because clearing would have been required for the drill rig access. Subsurface conditions encountered were similar to the foundation test borings. Subsurface conditions consisted of 1 foot of topsoil underlain by clayey, silty sand. No ground water was encountered. Percolation tests indicate percolation rates of 20 to 24 minutes per inch (MPI). The average percolation rate is 22 MPI. A profile hole will need to be excavated. The test pit should be excavated prior to the APEHD visiting the site. We should also observe the test pit. RECOMMENDATIONS - We recommend the installation of two septic tanks, a pump, and 4 chamber - bed OWS be installed at the locations presented on Figure 1. The OWS design is based on an average sewage load of 1300 GPD and a percolation rate of 22 MPI. We recommend the installation of two 2000 - DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 OWS Design Job No. 10708 Page 2 gallon single -compartment concrete septic tanks and a pump in a biotube vault in the second tank. The proposed OWS is not oversized for section rotation and should not be done. We recommend the installation of four chamber -beds, each with 2 rows of 14 chambers. A pump is required to distribute the effluent through the field to increase the efficiency of the field. We recommend a distribution box with flow equalizers be installed to distribute effluent between beds. We recommend a pump with 25 gallons per minute flow rate and 14.6 feet of head be installed. The floats should be set to pump 250 gallons. Pump details are presented as Figure 3. if additional bedrooms in unfinished areas are possible, we recommend the OWS be constructed to serve the additional loading. This OWS design will serve a five -bedroom residence greater than 6000 SF. For greater than five -bedrooms, the septic tank can be upsized 568 gallons for each additional bedroom. Each additional bedroom would require an additional 388 SF of field or 25 gravelless chambers. We recommend the surface of the field be seeded after installation of the fields. We recommend using a native seed mix available at seed stores. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed over the fields. No landscaping or plastic can be installed over the fields, which will reduce performance of the fields. Livestock should not be confined in the field areas. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE - The owner must realize an OWS is different from public sewer service, and must assume the responsibility for maintenance of the OWS. The system is relatively mainte- nance free, but the owner must have the septic tanks pumped. We recommend the septic tank be pumped and the effluent filter be cleaned or "hosed off' every two years. There are daily considerations, such as not putting plastic or other nonbiodegradable material into the OWS. Water use must be monitored so toilets are not allowed to run when seals malfunction. To illustrate the point, a running toilet can consume in excess of 1000 GPD. A loading of 1000 GPD could flood and irreparably harm the OWS. We caution against installation of a water softener. The hydraulic loading from the backwash of a water softener may be detrimental to OWS. A separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash waste, if a softener is installed. Chemically treated water from a swimming pool or spas should not be introduced to the OWS. LIMITATIONS - An OWS design requires installation by a contractor who is experienced in its installation. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted. If subsurface conditions considerably different from those described in this report are encountered, we should be notified to evaluate the effect on the proposed OWS. If the health department makes modifications to this design, we should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the performance of the OWS. All construction is to be in accordance with the ISDS regulations. Pipe type and size, burial requirements, septic tank constriction, and other specifications, which are not depicted in our report, are to conform to the requirements of the ISDS regulations. The installer of the system is to have demonstrated knowledge of the APEHD ISDS regulations and requirements. 9 If there are any questions or if we can be of further service, please call. Sincerely, 0 PP00 RFG,�s O F CHURCH & Asso C. "sG ; rn 13172 sa;o Edward O. Church, P. OrvAL ANG EOC/trp 2 copies sent 2 copy to Design By David Panico Inc 1533 Juniper Hill Road Aspen, CO 81611 OWS Dcsign Job No. 10708 Pap 3 3.314 ACRES LOT 32, STARWOOD VILLAGE A I PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO ff�l MIN BETWEEN BEDS..;: �10 SCAL 1. O/ IEDR O.M"RESIDENCE ... ...... .. 'dO SQUARE FEET PVC PIPE WIT /CLEANOUT BETWEE TANK AND RESIDENCE T -WO' 2000 GALLON SINGLE '`COMPARTMENT PRECAST CON RETE S PTIC TANKS WITH PUMP I IOTUBE VAULT IN SECOND ANK . . ........ ............ :BUTI'ON BOX WITH EQUALIZERS JOB NO. 10708 FIGURE 1 TYPICAL PLAN VIEW - N.T.S. 4" SCHEDULE 35 PVC OBSERVATION/VENT PIPE ICAL CROSS-SECTION - N.T.S. 4' MAX GRAVELLESS CHAMBER 3' BY 6.25' `4" SCHEDULE 35 PERFORATED PVC PIPE HUNG ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS (PIPE INSTALLED LEVEL) 4" SCHEDULE 35 PVC __------OBSERVATION/VENT PIPE ,�---'"� WITH C A P r—BACKFILL 1.5'.MIN. N --- ----5' M I N. EXTENT OF EXCAVATION ----- CALCULATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN CRITERIA STRUCTURE — 5 BEDROOMS, >6000 SF LOADING — 130 GAL/DAY/PERSON TOTAL LOADING — 1300 GPD PERCOLATION TEST — 22 MPI AREA — (1.75 X Q X –4T)/5y AREA-___ _ x � REDUCTION FOR USE OF CHAMBERS — 20% TOTAL AREA — 1736 SF FOUR TOTAL BEDS EFFLUENT INLET (1/8" PER FOOT DROP) 30. 6' MIN ................................................................ LEVEL MANIFOLD 4" SCHEDULE 35 PERFORATED PVC PIPE HUNG ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS SLOPEr0R GRAVELLESS CHAMBER_/ 3' BY 6.25' BED SPECIFICATIONS NUMBER OF BEDS — 4 LENGTH OF EACH BED — 87.5 FEET, 14 CHAMBERS WIDTH OF EACH BED — 6 FEET, 2 CHAMBERS TOTAL NUMBER OF CHAMBERS — 112 CHAMBERS TOTAL AREA — 1736 SF ---------DISTRIBUTION BOX 4" SCHEDULE 35 SOLID PVC PIPE EFFLUENT LINES TO ADDITIONAL BEDS TYPICAL DISTRIBUTION BOX - N.T.S. 3' APPROX. PLAN SEW r BAFFLE -+ (OPTIONAL) 1' APPROX. 44" LET CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION BOX OR EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE 35 PVC PIPE ONLET )U LE INLET OUTLET VIEW VIEW * MINIMUM OF FOUR OUTLETS NEEDED TREATMENT UNIT SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CAPACITY — 1.75 X Q X (30 HOURS/24 HOURS) = 2844 GALLONS RECOMMENDATION — TWO 2000 GALLON SINGLE COMPARTMENT PRE—CAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS WITH A PUMP IN A BIOTUBE VAULT IN SECOND TANK DRAIN FIELD DETAILS JOB NO. 10708 FIGURE 2 0 zs„ ply 1.1i fn' i ' i � t1 r\ . 1' AP ROX. )U LE INLET OUTLET VIEW VIEW * MINIMUM OF FOUR OUTLETS NEEDED TREATMENT UNIT SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CAPACITY — 1.75 X Q X (30 HOURS/24 HOURS) = 2844 GALLONS RECOMMENDATION — TWO 2000 GALLON SINGLE COMPARTMENT PRE—CAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS WITH A PUMP IN A BIOTUBE VAULT IN SECOND TANK DRAIN FIELD DETAILS JOB NO. 10708 FIGURE 2 c v d E o x ® a cn 3 � N ® p O Li 7 V E c U CL �`v r E toa o aM� W O C C c� a C Yi J o E •C ar J• ar c-, o o m a E'., vw a v v� IIS J `- FC o a E_ o -Erx, =a 0V,c4i c CL� a �m �o� o c J7 v in r F- 2 H N U V U v wy > cmc c•av'iy� �tnocn c • € r QoQ C, U LZ N _ O U U N u W o • a C v 4 v IZi n u �y�� V L W m N W) --t' t/') 2 w = CO y N v U N M U C d -& U rn C C .} Z m U U U .O LL V y V W N y C C -0 75 I rz t� U N 3 � C O 0, a z v � - c cnvi u— W aEi =� cN Uv .� o O CD Vo Iia J oto > Cl) C vK F c C� U S v a v c IIS o V v E C r C N U V Q 01 01� fn v p �- /cam iv vv e-rn v z oc Doi, n owc vo U w av a� a `` �an 0 10 ,n w S. N1) N U N C N O C O to O O O C O > N .� O N U ,t cn cA o oc`u °� - w IL E N a� vim- Q O C 3 N N a, a o C _ O O sonI bo 3 J] N N C \u'i N 0= N C td N C N O 0 3 L L Sol I I mini O ca C O on I INS on one I It d0 N LA 1sell U in U C~ L N O N Z Z to PON or a I- I ° .� N p ° L to >- Q $ ,n - (n 0OD W Q J 121101 -p I login 1 111 1 .51 loll ON I ad sea 'Idol I J L N III I son I Nonni so Ills III one Ora in I 0 111111 IIHIA III I � _ so I in inisom inner is 12 11 19011 1 1 1 is so IN in onsom Fin I 0 IM I in in go I I III go I so Ails oil 0 ,n w S. N1) N U N C N O C O to O O O C O > N .� O N U ,t cn cA o oc`u °� - w IL E N a� vim- Q O C 3 N N a, a o C _ O O bo 3 J] N N C \u'i N 0= N C td N C N O 0 3 L L N N N O to N ci M 00 4; 4A C N N +L+ N u�i Uf a �' > N .� i. Ll.1 0 c O a cn cA o oc`u °� - w IL E m a� vim- Q W 3 N >. a, a o a _ O bo 3 J] N N O \u'i N 0= N C td N C N O 0 3 L L a O J O ca C O =' N+ d0 N LA Q U U C~ L N O N Z Z to a I- ° .� N p ° L to >- Q $ ,n - (n 0OD W Q J -p J L N 0 � _ o21a3-3�1-pq CHURCH & Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS January 19, 2000 Mr. and Mrs. Kurt Hollin er 408 Aspen Airport Business Center, Suite 222 Aspen, Colorado 81611-3508 Subject: Installation Observations, Proposed Hollinger Residence Lot 32, Starwood Village Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 10708 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Hollinger, As requested, we observed the installation of the onsite wastewater system (OWS) for the subject site on November 2, 1999. The system was designed under our Job No. 10708, dated February 19, 1999. The system includes the installation of two 2000 -gallon, single -compartment, precast concrete septic tanks, with an effluent filter on the outlet of the first tank, and a pump in the second tank, and four two - chamber wide, by fourteen -chamber long beds, for a total infiltrative area of 1736 square feet (SF). An as -built drawing is included as Figure 1. The pump, alarm, and effluent filter were in place and wired at the time of our site visit. Doug Hayes with K. C. Smith Builders is authorized to turn on the electricity to the OWS at his discretion. The components of the OWS were installed in conformance with the plans and specifications. If there are any questions or if we can be of further service, please call. CHURCH and Associates, Edward O. Church, P.E. EOC/trp 2 copies sent 0. cyG,.F� ALL' 13172 s; �N IONA1-E0 Fax and copy to APEI3D, Attn: Nancy MaKenzie, 970.920.5074 Fax to K.C. Smith Builders, Attn: Doug Hayes, 970.544.3638 Copy to David Panico, 1533 Juniper Hill Road, Aspen, CO 81611 DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 a �� 3.314 ACRES LOT 32, STARWOOD VILLAGE 5 BED�RQ�V-4 >6000 SQ PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO >6000 SQUARE FEET FUR STANDARD 6' X B7,5'/PER/BE /2 RD,IS OF 14� M 11 CHAN�BEI�/TDTA M-1 "VPV/c lf'E- WITH WU T B TANK DENCE TW IN10 COMPARTP �SE-pnc T BIOTUBF-- �KDIS- RI-BUTI-O—N]313X F SCALE is = 30** 71 4 Z' 1p A UILT DRAWING JOB NO. 10708 FIGURE 1 i HEPWORtH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5020 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax 970 945-8454 Phone 970 945-7988 SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT R32, STARWOOD PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 198 556 SEPTEMBER 11, 1998 PREPARED FOR: KURT AND DALE HOLLINGER 408 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, SUITE 222 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-3508 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. PERCOLATION TESTING Preliminary percolation tests were conducted on August 27, 1998 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. Four percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes were hand dug 26 to 30 inches deep and nominal 12 inches diameter, and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those encountered in the borings shown on Fig. 2 and consist of silty sand and clay. A profile boring was not drilled in the septic disposal area because clearing would have been required for the drill rig access. The percolation test results are presented in Table II. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the test area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. When the location of the proposed septic disposal system has been determined, we should perform site specific percolation testing, including a profile hole to a depth of at least 4 feet below the septic field depth. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. H -P GEOTECH APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 80' /BORING ORING 2 POSED IDENCE lAREA P 3 0 P 4 I0 LOT R-34 dUILUINU ENVELOPE I P 2 A-- - PROPOSE[ SEPTIC SYSTEM AREA 198 556 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK l LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS GEOTECHNICAL, INC. I AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES Fig. 1 M, M r BORING 1 ELEV. = 105.5' 0 32/12 5 WC=10.6 lo DD -120 33/12 10 a� L n. 36/12 0E15 WC=6.0 25 BORING 2 ELEV. = 100' R 50/8 WC=s. s 5 DD=123 DD=118 +4=24 -200=n -200=47 32/12 28/12 20 10 WC=10.1 OD=110 DD=115 -200=47 25 BORING 2 ELEV. = 100' R 50/8 WC=s. s 5 DD=118 -200=n 32/12 WC=s.1 10 OD=110 i a� I s 40/12 n. 15 0 50/11 20 25 50/7 30 30 _ Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Fig. 3. 198 556 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 2 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND: 4^-! TOPSOIL. oraanic cicv. silty. sandv. medium stiff to stiff. slightly moist. dark brown. root_y. L?L] CLAY (CL); silty, sandy, scattered gravel, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist, brown to red. SAND (SC—SM); clayey to silty, some sandy clay zones, gravelly, possible cobbles, medium dense, moist, red, angular to subangular sandstone fragments. hRelatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. California liner sample. 32/12 Drive sample biow� count; indicates that 32 blows of a 140—pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive he California sampler 12 inches. NOTES i. r_nNrur uivey vur uryo ric G uriircu Jir nuyuaL a 'wiur u �—nri.rr ururrrcLcr Cu,rurruvuo iiiyiii Nuncr vuycr. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided and roughly correspond to the locations staked by the architect. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were measured by instrument level and refer to Boring 2 as elevation 100, assumed. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method ,.---d. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory borin.a logs represent the aQQroxtma`a bound -Cries between material types and transitions may be gradual. o. No free water was encountered in the borings at the tirne of drilling or when checked 1 day later. i iu�iuuiivir lir viu icr icwci rirvy vi. �.ur w�iiir iiiir c. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % 1 DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve. —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve. 198 556. HEPWORTH - PAWLAK LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 3 GEO ECHUICAL, INC. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE it PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 198 556 Paae 1 of 2 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-1 27 10 17 1/2 14 3 1/2 24 14 11 3/4 21/4 11 3/4 10 1/2 1 1/4 10 1/2 91/4 1 1/4 9 1/4 8 1/4 1 81/4 7 1/2 3/4 7 1/2 7 1/2 7 6 1/4 3/4 6 1/4 5314 1/2 53/4 5 1/4 1/2 51/4 5 1/4 5 41/2 1 /2 P-2 27 10 181/2 131/4 51/4 20 13 1/4 11 3/4 1 1/2 11 3/4 11 3/4 11 93/4 1 1/4 93/4 9 3/4 9 8 1/2 1/2 8 1/2 8 1/2 8 7 1/2 1/2 7 1/2 7 1/2 7 6 1/2 1/2- 6 1/2 6 1/2 6 5 112 1/2 NOTE: Percolation holes were hand dug and soaked on August 26, 1998. Percolation tests were conducted on August 27, 1998. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE it PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 198 556 Paae 2 of 2 (HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-3 26 10 18 1/2 141/4 41/4 20 14114 12 21/4 12 101/2 1 1/2 10 '/2 91/4 1 1/4 91/4 8 1 1/4 8 71/4 3/4 71/4 6 '/: 3/4 6 1/2 53/4 3/4 53/4 5 3/4 5 41/4 3 /4 41/4 4 1/4 4 31/2 1 /2 P-4 30 10 18 143/4 31/4 24 143/4 123/4 2 123/4 11 1/2 1 1/4 11 1/2 101/4 1 1/4 101/4 9 1/4 1 9114 8 1/2 3/4 8 1/2 73/4 3/4 73/4 7 3/4 7 6 1/2 1/2 6 1/2 6 1/2 6 53/4 1/4 51/4 51/4 1/2 NOTE: Percolation holes were hand dug and soaked on August 26, 1998. Percolation tests were conducted on August 27, 1998. MAR. 5.1999 3.23F m START ' HOME OW, I E}� V STARWDaD WATER DISTRICT 0121 Stewart Drive Aspen, Colorado 81811 T0: Nancy Emerson Pitkin County Environmental �ealth FRom: Julia Johnston, Secretary Starwood dater District N0.172 P.2 DATE: March 5, 1999 RE: Water Seryice - -io71inger - Tract R-32, 0220 Johnson Drive. Starwood This is to confirm that the Starwood Wager District will supply water to the new residence to be built on Tract R-32. 0210 Johnson Drive, Starwood Subdiv-'sinn. If you have any questions, please cal' me at 925 -8939 - Thank you. cc: Starwood Water District Board 03/05/99 15:17 TX/RX NO.5360 P.002 M `_ lJ33 JLiapm HlEL RL1� N W Q)LORADD INC., _. _.� 1970)923 5394 Fwx (970)9Z�I260' � - _ ' �Q M_�_1L�f.._V.N IEL -PLAN.__ HOLLINGER RESIDENCE SHEET NumaEm lar R-32 STARWOOD, Prrw CoUNTr ; COLORADO A-2 DESIGN BY DAVID PANICO INC -MI.. ]333jrnvasexn4 xnen,��,ago CowteDo i970)9?3-5394 F— (970)923- ! 1 \ !oo / 1,I M of f) I�-7To;;,f ; 0 X016, .b NP I-OGlaT t o N( f '�/ `/✓ � \ ` /' / ,, [.a�S112uGTION �;rtvLlN�,. o v I 0 2 tiT I N A 64 k fit? moo N Icn a N � �, � � l� ,� �•.to TO 1Zf.MAdN �___--- / y , _t ----'A._ -jtS W Ab �a .� _. ,2 80 - u \ pt�st p _ j 10 op .� �J ,,-` w. ---- 41 l3 MiT,17Wit" -r Sot D LO O N OF \ r H u(,e r5� lG'N (SOX T bf '/_--- // \ /� /01 0� D --_ -_ PRa►►�FjE To /;tN TWiii Ai' -4. €R� uI r t TUrt;5' 4` TO pI�y/.,%' 10 OTS L4E I �o PL -11 II II I II I I BUILDING ELEVA'T`ION ARCHITECT l_.` IZ AL ELEVA"TION 1 ()0"—(1" EQUALS TOPOGRAPI If CAL ELEVATION 91.5' WHICH EQL"ALS AN APPROXLNL-VIT ELEVATION ABO\,T' SEA LEVEL OF 8150' BUILDING ELEVATION MUST CORRESPOND TO INFORMATION PRESENTED TO, AND .APPROVED BY, THE STARWOOD ARCHITECTURAL REVIEXT,' BOARD. ILDER, ARCHITECTLRAL DESIGN ER, AND SURVEYOR ARE TO MEET ON SITE TO VERIFY CORRECT ELEVATION UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION. ZONING AND OTHER APPROVALS BUILDING SITE IS PART OF THE STARWOOD SUBDIVISION AND THEREFORE IS NO'T ECT TO ANY COUNTY APPROVALS. COUNTY STAFF VERIFIED THAT THE SITE WAS T IN A LOCATION THAT WOULD �i1kKE IT SUBJECT TO RIDGELIKE REVIEW. THE PROJECT HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO, AND APPROVED BY, THE STARWOOD 'ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE.. FLOOR AREA RATIO ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA— 15,000 SQUARE FEET PROPOSED FLOOR AREA -6663.41 SQUARE FEET ? METHODS :kND CAT,CITT ATTONTO) THAT T)FTRWAfTNFT) THE F.A.R. IS DEFINED ON BUILDING LOCATION .00ATION OF THE RESIDENCE, DRIVEWAY AND DRAIN FIELD SHOULD BE STAKED =IE BUILDER BEFORE THE LOT IS.CLEARED TO VERIFY CORRECT LOCATIONS AND ?NTATION TO VIEWS. THE LOCATION OF THE RESIDENCE MUST CORRESPOND TO �OCATION PRESENTED TO, AND APPROVED BY THE STARWOOD ARCHITECTURAL TFW BOARD -THF BI'TT FF R Ail! ATF i7R , r' -f F-F:''ING AT THE L I.l4T1TS OF THE :EA OF CONSTRUC I ION AS DEFINED ON THE SITE PLAN AT LEFT TO LIMIT THE PACTS OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR WILL ALSO POST A SIGN ON SITE REPEATING THIS OBJECTIVE. SOILS REPORT DILS REPORT WAS PREPARED BY HP GEOTECH INC.AND ISSUED ON SEPTEMBER `,1998. ALL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS REPORT SHOULD BE .R'vTD BY THE BUILDER AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS. HP GEOTECH INC. SHOULD BE CONTACTED AFTER EXCAVATION IS COMPLETE TO VERIFY THAT SOIL, CONDITIONS MATCH THOSE DESCRIBED IN THE REPORT. FIRE SPRINKLER 'ROPOSED RESIDENCE WILL BE COMPRISED OF MORE THAN 5000 GROSS SQUARE EET AND, AS REQUIRED BY PITKI\ COUNTY CODE, WILL REQUIRE THAT AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM BE INSTALLED. SURVEY [IS SITE PIAN Wth; DEVELOPED FROM INFORMATION PROVIDED I'_\ A SURVEY PREPARED BY LINES IN SPACE SURVEYORS, DATED OCTOBER 27, 1998. DRAWING SCHEDULE Al SITE PLA -NL SURVEY (PERMIT SET ONLY) A2 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A3 UPPER LEVEL FLOORPLAN A4 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A5 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A6 ROOF PL-�N A7 BUILDING SECTIONS A8 BUILDING SECTIONS A9 INTEZIC i�ti .Ib ., _ A10 INTERIOR WALL ELEVATIONS All INTERIOR WALL ELEVATIONS F.A.R.1 FLOOR AREA CALLS F.A,R. 2 FLOOR AREA CALCS E1 LOWER LEVEL ELECT R CAL PLAN E2 UPPER LEVEL ELECTRICAL PLAN SiGENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS S2 FOUNDATION Pl--%N S3 LOWER LEVEL. FLOOR FRAMING S4 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR FRAMING S5 ROOF FRAMING S6 SECTIONS & DETAILS � LLINGElZ RESIDENCE LOT -32 STARWOOD, PITRIN COUNTY COLORADO DE.c.'511GN BY DAVID PANICO INC I533 JUNI ER HILL ROADS ASPENS COLORADO (970)923-5394 Fax: (470)923-1260 SHEET NUMBER Al DATE Issum