Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
pitkin.eh.264335107007 (2007)
Pitkin County Environmental Health & Natural Resources Department Permit for an Individual Sewage Disposal System 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-5077 Reissued Permit # 07040 B Parcel I D # 2643-351-07-007 Type of permit New(x) Repair( ) Addition/Remodel to House( ) Name of Owner Lot 94 Starwood, LLC Street Address-1�Larson Dr, Aspen, CO Property legal description Lot 94, Blk 16 Starwood Size of lot 2.63 Total square footage of the house 8,000 (plans dated 4/14/2007) Water source Community/Public Water System — Starwood Metro District # of bedrooms in house 5 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house Caretaker unit Total square footage of the caretaker unit # of bedrooms in caretaker unit # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in caretaker unit Designed for what # rooms (list) FIVE Bedrooms Permit information Designed by Church OWC, LLC Mailing Address PO Box 527 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-0527 Perc rate 32 Profile hole depth 9.5 ft Depth to groundwater or bedrock Minimum Septic tank capacity 2844gallons Minimum Absorption area Comments > 9.5 ft 2574sf / 50%redu= 1287sf Septic permit approved per compliance with the engineer design and specifications dated May 4, 2007, Project # C349. Any changes must be approved by this department and the design engineer prior to them being made. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the Pitkin County ISDS regulations. Design is for a 2000 gallon one -compartment septic tank followed by a 1500 gallon two-compartment septic tank with dual effluent pumps in a Biotube pump vault. Effluent is pumped to two sets of trenches, each set with 5 trenches with Quick4 gravelless chambers for a total of 131 chambers. This department does not endorse any brand of products. This permit must be kept on-site during installation. The engineer must do a final inspection of the installation and submit an as -built letter to this department. This department must also be called for an inspection with a minimum of 48 hours advanced notice. The owner has the responsibility that all components are inspected and maintained on a regular basis by qualified personnel. Revegetation over the area of the field is very important for the functioning of the system. Pitkin County has guidelines that must be followed to assure the plants that are introduced are appropriate for the conditions of the area. The use of native plants is strongly encouraged. Permit approved by: Date: _ sl - Plans and specifications of the (4os'e( individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Expiration Date: Installer: AAA License Number: C qo;Z Final approval:Date: cid 1-1 r t' "SITE WASTEWATER TREATME' SYSTEM (OWTS) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT At ?LICATION I; /NR 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10 • Aspen, CO - 81611 Phone: 970.920.5070 Fax: 970.920.5077 Parcel ID# (available from the Pitkin County Assessor's Office / 970-920-5160 or at www.pitkinassessor.orq): 7 te q3 3-5 C> 7 - Q 7 Purpose of Permit: NEW ❑ REPAIR DUE TO FAILURE ❑ REMODEL/ADDITION ❑ TANK ONLY ❑ FIELD ONLY Cost of System Repair or Remodel/Addition (approximate): Property Address: L^ L R Sn N ? Lot: Block: Filing: Subdivision: S)� D Property Owner(s)*: Email Address: 62 W o r G L- C M)W X 47- 4 S k/ P4,fZ L- Owner's Mailing Address: City, State, Zip: 2 Of- S , M1 L- A S7-, A5P,~ -^j cy 81 to / 1 Home Phone: Business Phone: X70) %Z�'^ /2 O *Contact information must he nrnvided for tha nwner sinninn this ann1icatinn Primary Contact Person/Applicant (if not owner): Company: C L&L" v 3Zut e2rvE2 ea�vs �. Contact/Applicant Mailing Address: City, State, Zip: 27 Cc. l�D. coo SL'I = 1 cc+ C 2 n/ Ct= Co l�2_ C ho e: 70 37 Business Phone: Q © - Fax NuTher: Email Address: cE 7 0 0 - / Building Permit # (if applicable): do �. 2 re) "7. P Lot Size (in acres): ; 6,3 Size of Building (square feet): Number of Potential Bedrooms: 00 0 Detached Accessory Unit? ❑ YES XNO Size of Accessory Unit (square feet): Number of Potential Bedrooms In or Fixture List for the Accessory Unit: Water Source: ❑ PRIVATE WELL ❑ SURFACE WATER ❑ SPRING COMMUNITY/PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM Name of Community/Public Water System (if applicable): v✓ Cp rl C--T(Zo \ Ehgirieeringl=?m'- "-" _" Job Number: Phone Number: L' C vi L C:_ 7 -2 O Mailin C ?2.0-679 - 5y�5 PLEASE READ BEFORE SIGNING: I certify that the above information is complete and accurate and that I have provided complete and accurate information in all of the documents included in my application package. I acknowledge that EH/NR may revoke any permit I am issued if my application is found to contain any inaccurate, false, or misleading information. I understand that no construction may be undertaken on an OWTS until an OWTS Construction Permit is issued. Owner Signature: Date: Applicant Signature: Date: FOR OFFICE U E ONLY Received by F&HR Staff: F e & Receipt Date: 1 orms onst pp.x s Updated: j■� 08;' 10i 2008 23:22 9709201234 ■ti ■ ■ ■ Sian ASPEN PURE ■ 0 0 0■ tib' d '1d101C?N511 C WA, I CYVA 1 CK 1 PCI=W 1 Mr—fM t a s o i �N9r wtr�' •�� CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION coStle CreQX Road. Suite 10 - Aspen, 81611 MkV 0405 GPh Phone: 970.920-6070 pax -97D,97-0,6377 w PAGE 01 parerol JD* (avajLlwo irnm tnn Pitkin Caunbt AMOW0106 OiTCe t6 y5 3 / t _ -7 — 0 0 973 920 61G0 or at.uw.v. ' frMasses4o nr r t TANK ONLY FIELD ONLY Purpose Ot psrmis: NEyy , ❑REPAIR pU6 TO FAiI,URI: ❑ REMOp�(jADDITION • st of 5yS1Rm Repair or I7QmodeiFAdditlon (avprnxlmate): ^j F : -� ;nfi)rtnatfon m4tat be prpyrdw for the own mf slgRNrg tNrS AppRCet on, Prlmarr Contavt FersonftAddrOM 1 owner); C CoMacUApplicat MA11ing C7O Fax e� 4[ ng Permit it V 9PPl1ca61eY ize (in Aores); Df gulping (Square Teat)-. A. 3m0O ched AaMSB ry UMIU Ej YU Mr of poterttl;t Bedmvms In or FWUre Llst er 5ovrce: CD PRIVATE WELL ,a er Cornmunity(punlic Water System (if ski Email AAdress: clw. swa, ZIP7 fiuAiney. Phorm: Cvmpnny. Ocf Address: of FOtEIr1 IN BetlrNf": ❑ SURFACE WATER Q SPRING COMMUNM/PUBLIC WATER 5CS1'15`9 PLEAS9 READ BEFCFZ SIGNING: lutO anti AC"ratointertnation in all otthe documents 1 cratify that the abovo intormx"on 16 awiedge that at �N NR m0y ravet.6 and that I hAV0 any pormi t an► ►ssuad my appii�en Is Sound " eentain any included in rrty apPllo011on package• included norcation ding wp- I ae ri I undmtgtand that no oonstrurt+on may de undert�lC�n on an OWTS until an 0vv7S CormtrueNOn Porm;" Issued. Datk1 r `� ' Ovmat SigQaturE: Date: nr lorl by EN/HR j; Fee & Receipt A, Date'. W"f S\FormRu%onswpP•as 22:tir. a0ez-titi-end Tn/TM'A Pitkin County Environmental Health Department Contact Log Sheet Kill _. • 0 ROM ELI 0�2 �s RkEWIM P CHURCH OWC, LLC Onsite Wastewater Consultants November 24, 2008 Shannon Sweeney 41 Danielson Drive Aspen, CO 81611 Subject: OWS Installation Observation, Lot 94, Starwood Larson Drive Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. C349 Mr. Sweeney, As requested by the onsite wastewater system (OWS) installation contractor, CHURCH Onsite Wastewater Consultants, LLC (COWC) has performed three installation observations of the system. A site visit was performed on August 20, 2008. At the time of the site visit, the septic tank and dosing tank were both installed; no plumbing into or out of either tank was present. The installer and Blue River Construction superintendent, Mr. Don Glenn were informed that each tank needed inlet tees A second site visit was performed on September 3, 2008. At the time of the site visit, the 2,000 - gallon septic tank was covered and the 1,500 -gallon dosing tank was exposed and the pump system was being installed. No plumbing for the building sewer pipe installation was able to be observed. There was a 4 -inch PVC cleanout at the building. The two drainfields were in the process of being installed with piping in Quick4 chambers, and the correct number of chambers, per the design documents were verified to be in place. Two 5 - outlet ADV's in PVC risers were in place. The pipe extended from the ADV to each field was 1.5 - inch diameter, rather than the 2 -inch pipe specified in the design documents. After returning to the office, a calculation was performed that verified that the 1.5 -inch PVC pipe would work in the design. A third site visit was performed on November 21, 2008. At the time of the site visit, the system was completely installed, control panel was in-place, wired and working. The pump and alarm floats were lifted and function of each was confirmed. LIMITATIONS This letter furnishes information collected from observations made during three visits to the subject site. COWC has observed installed components of the OWS; no inspections have been performed. COWC does not have the authority to control the methods, protocols, schedule or 9590 West 14th Avenue Ste. 100, Lakewood, CO 80215 Voice 720-898-3434 FAX: 720-898-3455 OWS Instaliation Observations, Job No. C349 November 24, 2008, Page 2 the equipment that has been selected by the installer and/or client. Neither the observations made nor the contents of this letter imply any warrantee or guarantee of materials or workmanship. It is possible that problems with the system may occur in the future due to installation procedures that were not able to be observed by COWC. The observed components of the OWS appear to be installed in general conformance with the CHURCH OWS design, plans and specifications. If there are questions or if we can be of further service, please feel free to call us at your convenience. Sincerely, CHURCH Onsite Wastewater Consultants, LLC Robert W. Wright, PE RW W 3 copies sent D�p,D0 L/ oil _ Copy to: Pitkin County Environmental Health, ATTN: Ms. Carla Ostberg 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10 Aspen, CO 81611 Kristen Stroud From: Robert Wright [rwright@cowc.info] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 2:31 PM To: Carla Ostberg Cc: Kristen Stroud Subject: RE: ns Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Great. On another topic, the engineer's letter for Lot 94 Starwood, LLC 256 Larson Drive Job # C349 Dated 5/2007 has not been written yet, as I believe we have been waiting for a final call from the contractor to check pump, float and alarm function. I did get a call from Fred at Valley Precast, telling me that he had finalled our the installation of pumps, floats and alarms, and we can write a letter indicating that if the contractor does not want us to make another trip, but we will indicate that we have not seen the system function first hand. I have a call in to Don out there, and will ask him what the skinny is. Thanks, CHURCH Onsite Wastewater Consultants, LLC Bob Wright, PE Project Engineer Phone 720.898.3434 Cell 720.272.6469 From: Carla Ostberg[mailto:Carla.Ostberg@co.pitkin.co.us] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 2:17 PM To: Robert Wright Subject: RE: 2009 CPOW Conference Preser I'll think of some questions and get back to y Carla Ostberg, REHS Environmental Health Program ervisor Pitkin County Environmental Health Nati 970-920-5438 From: Robert Wright [mailto:rwright@cowc. Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 2:04 PM To: Carla Ostberg Subject: RE: 2009 CPOW Conference Prese Carla, To make everything easier on both the panelists and the moderator, I am compiling questions that will be given to everyone as soon as they are all in. I have asked panelists to think of questions and send them to me via e-mail so I can collate them and send them out to all on the panel. Carla Ostber From: Robert Wright [rwright@cowc.info] Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:46 PM To: Carla Ostberg Cc: Kristen Stroud Subject: C349, 256 Larson Drive, Starwood, OWS Carla & Kristen, I misspoke in my earlier e-mail regarding the OWS at the subject address. I will write the engineer's letter for our last observation of the system on Monday, but our office policy is that we do not send out any invoices until we have received payment for the installation observations conducted. We will forward an invoice to Mr. Sweeney for payment Monday, and send our engineer's letter as soon as payment is received. Thanks very much, CHURCH Onsite Wastewater Consultants, LLC Bob Wright, PE Project Engineer Phone 720.898.3434 Cell 720.272.6469 CHURCH OWC, LLC Onsite Wastewater Consultants May 4, 2007 Shannon Sweeney 41 Danielson Drive Aspen, CO 81611 Subject: OWS Design, Lot 94, Starwood - Revision Larson Drive Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. C349 2 �- D-1-oo-1 Ri2mn+ b`1 o 1 Mr. Sweeney, As requested CHURCH Onsite Wastewater Consultants, LLC (COWC) has prepared an onsite wastewater system (OWS) design for the subject property. The design is based on profile and percolation information by Hepworth-Pawlak. The design is for submittal for an OWS permit. This report provides revisions per discussion with Pitkin County Environmental Health. SITE CONDITIONS The lot is in a rural residential area of Pitkin County, where OWS are required. The site has moderate to steep slopes. The drainfield is limited to slopes of less than 30%. Vegetation includes a sparse cover of grasses and a mix of service berry, scrub oak and aspen. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION A five -bedroom residence with a living area 8000 square feet (ft') is proposed at the location indicated on Figures 1 and 2. The OWS was sized based on 5 bedrooms, which is 1300 GPD,' using PCEHD loading of 130 GPD per person. The sewage loading with a peaking factor of 1.75 is 2275 GPD. Loading includes washing machines and garbage grinders. Water will be provided by the local water district. If additional bedrooms are possible, it is suggested the OWS be constructed to serve the addi- tional bedrooms. The installation of an up-sized OWS can be cost effective. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The subsurface investigation was conducted by Hepworth-Pawlak by excavating two profile pits and three percolation holes, 37 to 50 inches deep, at the locations presented on Figure 1 of Appendix A. Subsurface conditions encountered in the profile holes consisted of 2 feet of sandy clay topsoil, underlain by sandy clay with scattered sandstone fragments to the maximum depth explored of 9.5 feet. No ground water was present in either profile hole. Percolation tests indicate percolation rates'anging from 20 minutes per inch (MPI) to 45 MPI. The average percolation rate is 32 MPI. Percolation data is presented in APPENDIX A. 9590 West 14th Avenue Ste. 100, Lakewood, CO 80215 Voice 720-898-3434 FAX: 720-898-3455 %NW O Design Revision, Job No. C349 05/04/07, Page 2 The percolation tests were performed without involvement by COWC. The percolation holes do not evenly cover the area of the proposed fields. Our observation of the profile pits and the site indicate the subsurface information should be applicable for the proposed field areas. Additional profile information may be required prior to issuing the permit or at the time of construction. y RECOMMENDATIONS 31002�� The OWS should be installed as indicated on Figures 2 through 6. The sewage loa for the y` OWS is 2275 GPD. The OWS installation must include a minimum of one -gallon, single - compartment, followed by a 1500 -gallon two-compartment septic tank with ual effluent pumps in a Biotube° pump vault in the second compartment. Pump specifications are presented as Figure 5. Effluent is to be pumped, to two automatic distribution valves, one serving each Drainfield Areas I and II through 1Y.25 -inch schedule 40 pipe as presented on Figure 2. The drain field installation must include 131 Quick 4 Infiltrator chambers as presented on Figures 2 and 3. Five chamber trenches are proposed north of the residence in the area identified as DRAINFIELD AREA I. The second set of 5 chambers trenches will be to the northwest of the residence identified as DRAINFIELD AREA II. The northwest site requires crossing a slope of greater than 30%, which was approved by Pitkin County Planning. The location of the sewer stub -out from the dwelling is unknown. The septic tank should; 1) be located down gradient of the home, 2) be buried no deeper than three feet, and 3) at a location accessible for pumping and maintenance at the tank. If COWC can assist with locating the septic tank after the stub -out location is identified, please call. Drainfield Area I has 5 chamber trenches with 13 chambers / trench and Drainfield Area II has 4 chamber trenches with 13 chambers / trench and one trench having 14 -chambers. Effluent will be distributed to the trenches via an automatic distribution valve as indicated on Figure 6. l? 4 EFFLUENT PUMPING SYSTEMS The installation of an OrencoO Pump System is recommended. Edward 0. Church, P.E. is a non- participating owner of SCG Enterprises, Inc., which is a local distributor for Orenco Systems, Inc. SCG Enterprises, Inc. The proposed pumping system and substitutions must meet the following minimum specifications: Pumps - The pumps selected for the lift stations should have a minimum capacity of 17.9 gallons per minute at a total dynamic head of 42.7 feet. A manufacturer's pump curve diagram is presented on Figure 5. Minimum power rating of 1/2 -Horsepower (230 -volt) is recommended for the pumps. The pumps shall be UL and CSA listed as an effluent pump. OSI Model P300512 pumps are recommended. Access Risers— Access risers that extend to final grade must be provided. The risers are to . be watertight and attached to the septic tanks such that a watertight seal is provided. Risers should be rated for the appropriate load requirements. Discharge Assembly — The pump discharge assembly (Orenco cold weather version) is to have a disconnect union accessible from the ground surface to allow pump replacement. Float Switch Assembly— The on/off, timer over -ride, and high water alarm floats are to be accessible for adjustment without removing the pump or vault. Pump float switches should be set to discharge 63 gallons per dose. �►` QDesign Revision, Job No. C349 05/04/07, Page 3 Electrical Sp/ice Box— The splice box shall be UL approved for wet locations. All wire splices are to be completed with UL listed waterproof splice connectors. Controls and Alarms — Controls and alarms shall be listed per UL 508. Controls are to include a toggle switch for manual operation of the pumps; separate dedicated circuits for the pumps and the high water alarm; an audible and visual alarm; and an elapsed time meter Panels are'to be NEMA 4X rated. Location= The pump control panel is to be mounted within sight of the respective pump system.``The ,panel IS also,, to be located such that the alarm can be readily seen and heard (remote alarms to a location within the buildings can be provided). The panel is to be mounted at convenient heights to allow access and maintenance. Second chamber 1500 -Gallon Dosing Tank Chamber— The float elevations shall be set in the dosing tank to provide' a 63 gallon dose each time the pump is activated. Only a tank with top overflow from the first to second chamber shall be allowed. No: mid -baffle flow through tank shall` be permitted. The pump must not drop the water level in the first chamber of the tank. The float elevations indicated on Figure 4 are approximate. The contractor shall adjust the float tether length and anchor point to -ensure that the dose is as specified here -in. OPERATION AND .MAINTENANCE The owner must realize an OWS is different from public sewer service. The owner must assume responsibility for maintenance.of the system. The.system is relatively maintenance free, but the owner must have the septic tanks pumped and filters cleaned (hosed off). It is recommended the tank be pumped and filter -cleaned every two years. There are daily considerations, such as not: putting plastic or other non -biodegradable material into the system. Water use must be monitored so toilets are not allowed to leak when seals malfunction. To illustrate the point, a running toilet will consume in excess of 1000 gallons per day if allowed to flow. An excess 1000 GPD—loading—could flood -and irreparably harm the field. COWC cautions against installation of a water. softener.. The hydraulic loading from the back_ wash of a water softener can be detrimental to OWS and a separate drywell should be con strutted for the backwash waste, if a water softener is installed. No plastic sheeting should be used over the field, which will reduce evapotranspiration from the field. Chemically treated water from a swimming pool or spas should not be introduced into the OWS. LIMITATIONS - A drip irrigation design requires installation by a contractor.who-is an`experienced installer. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted. If subsurface' conditions. different from those described are encountered, we should evaluate the effect of the- changes on the proposed OWS. If the health department makes modifications to this design, we should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the performance of our OWS design. All construction is to be in accordance with the. ISDS regulations. Pipe type and size, burial requirements, septic tank construction, and other specifications, which are not depicted in our report, are to conform to the ISDS regulations, The installer of the system is to have demonstrated knowledge of the ISDS regulations and requirements. 00esign Revision, Job No. C349 05/04/07, Page 4 If there are questions or if we can be of further service, please call. Sincerely, CHURCH OnsitepSOFultants, LLC Edward 0. Ch rc! .t "' EOC 3 copies sent_ Copy to: Pitkin County Environmental Health, AT"N: Nancy Mackenzie 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10 Aspen, CO 81611 0 t 2.4 ACRES O t0 LOT R-94 `�' O M STARWOOD SUBDIVISION cy M M M \ PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO M �, i, 7—\ — -\—�—� t 7 DRAI\NFIELD A EA 1 \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ o 1 I I I �O� DRAINFIELD TRENCH TYPui C3, \ \ \\\ \\ \ \ 1 1 I I I 1 \ I 11 I\ 1 1 11 NOTE: 1 I 'I I o I 1 I I I I 1 11 I I I INTERMEDIATE CONTOUTAS I I I z I III I I I I I 1 I REMOVED BETWEEN 1 I I I A �OMAT C I III I I I ELEVATION 370 AND ELEVATION 320 FOR 1 I I I \ I DI TRIBU ION VA L E I I I I I I I I CLARITY. �1 I I I 1 I I 11 II I I \ J I I II DRAINFIELD AR A 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 I I I SII II I 0 `� I I I I I I 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I o s' SCALE 1 I /DRAINFIELD 4 30' ill = 30' 1 1 I I I AREA I I I I I 13.5' \ ? ,500—C. LLON TWO—COMPAZTMEIN T \ PUMPS CONCREIN B OTTUBE VAIC KILW/DUPLEX 4405 I I I I DAUTOATIC I TRIBUTION I VALE I 2,000—GALLON ONE—COMPARTMENT I I I I I III I I CONCRETE'=\SEPTIC TAN I o ( I I I I I I I \ 0 \ I I o I CLEANOUT I I I I I 1 I I 0 \M \ 1 I 111 1 1 I \ \ I I1 11 \ \11 \ \ I 1 \ \ 1 A-\ I 1 \ 1 p I I \ \ 1 I I 11111 I r I a II \ \ 1 \ I I I► I I I •I \ -A \ I I I I I CHURCH OWC, LLC LOT R-94 STARWOOD Onsite Wastewater Consultants PROPOSED OWS LOCATION Onsite Wastewater Engineering - Geological Engineering P.O. Box 527, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80034-0527 Voice: (720) 898-3434 Fax: (720) 898-3455 JOB NO. C349 DATE 5/2007 FIGURE 2 t 2.4 ACRES LOT R-94 STARWOOD SUBDIVISION PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO 0 0 0 0 4 0 \60 cW11\ V \ "I \ N \ \A\ 1, \� W \ '"uk \\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\ \1\\\ —�\� w \ 1 1 1 I►� 1 1 \ \ \\ \�0 1 III \ 1 \\ \ \ \ 1 II 11111 \ 1 1 1 1 I �I I I I 1 1 1 1 1\ 1 \ 1 11 11 ►\ 1\ \\ 1\ 1 \ 1 11 \ \11 I I I 1 1 1 1 I 11 11\ \1 \ 1 I\ 11 1 1111 11 11 11111 _'•III I I I I I 11 11111 I I I 11 111 11 G I III 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I III IIII 11 I I 1 1 1 1 111�I I Y %1 I 1 I III 11 1 1 1 1 I► IIIII 11 I III I I II I II IIII I I I I I Illi/ /111 I 111 11 I II II I I I I I I 1 r/'ill 1 I III 1 \11 IIIIIII I II IIII IIll1 Ill II�rII I II �. 1 i � I I 1 111 II I II III 1 111111 / rll IIIc Ili1 /I \ 1 1 ( III III IIII I II I l 11 111 IIIII li llll r l l nl�c` hlll / \ -r -- III I I 1 I r I I I I I l I l l l 1► 1 1 11 1 1 I{ I I I 11///ir�ili Illlilllll 1111 Ili► II, /I111�' 11 11 t i l iir l /l it l// I 1 r r 11 I l l I I I I! I I I I I t I I I I►► /IIIII . I 1 II r, l 1 /i„ l.�l 1 1 llllIII l 1111j1 1111.1 MII I I Ilio—IIII � l l iii lI 11 ll/ rl I l IIII I l�Il I Mil l l 141 1 II►�/// ii 1, .11ii i 1 Iil IIII Iltllll_y'711/ rl \ 1_\I► 111 �i� �/,� ,�/ !II ►I Illlltlllltl� �/1 11 If II III I I i II It /r / 11 I III I o/ r t 1 I !I/ �lll llIl I l I lilt II I II► II X11/ i RRbP LD P IIII .I I I I L VIELQ I t I l t I III 1 1 11 I -j r l IIII I 1 \�\ {III 1•r 11 I l l f 1 I I•t' I I t I I I I I IIIII'l�� III 1 C f 3 I I l I III I 1 n I I \ \ w IIII ISI I I I IIIII► 1 1111411 II /IIIII u, I I I I I I I I -I I P R 21 IIII I I I II C7 III - I \" wNl I III I I i l I I t I I I I IIII 1 j 1 I I II I I]� �11 111 \cv \ q I I 1 I�l�1�11 1 \M \ I I I I III 1 1 it 1111 IA I I � I III I� I I I IPPR I I I I I I III 111\ \\ 1 1 1 II I l y a 7�1 I I I ,� 1 1 I 1 I I I SCALE \- I I .I•I I i III 1 1 1 \ \II 1 11. Ilii ii IIII i 1"— 50' \\ ° \\ l i I �IR4' I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 ►III I I I 11 1 11 I 1 `'' \ I ►1 I I I I I I I I" 1 I 111 1 1111 111 11 11 \I 11 1 1 \ \ 1 •I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11� 11\ � �� i t\\ 1 1 1 1 \ \ I I I 1 1 1 1 1 \J I I / TI I I I I I 1 II I\\ it 1 1 \ \ 11 � I l i 1 I I I I I i ll l I• }�1�1 II III I I II 111 i t III 1 1 I \ \\ \ \1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I IR� 21 I I 1 I� I I� 1 III 1 I t \ ��., \I 1 II 11 1 1 1 1 ►1 I I 11 I i i 1� h I� I i 111 � 1 \ 1e t. t l III I I I I I ► 1 1 1111► 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1!I I l i Illi I I to , o \ \\ I i 1�1 11��, iii I I III t Ill �Illll�wl \ \ 1111�>\�111 �iIIIIIIII IIIIi 11, Awl I I I I \ \ \1 I l i l 111 IIII l i�I II IIII I opop�L� IEF tI l f I Al I I 1 1 11 1♦ it 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 II I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 �X 0 \ ! \ \ I M \ 0 0 Zn M THE LOCATION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HEREIN AND THE WELL AND/OR DRAIN FIELD LOCATIONS STAKED AT THE SITE ARE NOT THE RESULT OF A PROPERTY SURVEY. IMPROVEMENT LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. IT IS THE PROPERTY OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DEFINE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES AND ENSURE ALL ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE PLATTED SITE AND OUT OF INAPPROPRIATE EASEMENTS. ALL SEPARATION DISTANCES ARE TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1987 CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE. OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF LNDERGROUJO MEMBER UTILITIES CHURCH OWC ; LLC LOT R-94 STARWOOD Onsite Wastewater Consultants SITE PLAN Onsite Wastewater Engineering - Geological Engineering P.O. Box 527, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80034-0527 Voice: (720) 898-3434 Fax: (720) 898-3455 JOB NO. C349 DATE 05/2007 FIGURE 1 TYPICAL PLAN VIEW - N.T.S. 2" PVC EFFLUENT INLET (1/8" PER FOOT DROP) UNPAVED AREAS PAVED AREAS 5 -OUTLET AUTO DISTRIBUTION VALVE MATCH EXISTING A.0 PVMT. INFILTRATOR QUICK 4 MATCH EXISTING SAW CUT ASPHALT ONLY. GRAVELLESS CHAMBER GRADE NO OTHER TYPE CUT 3BY 4', TYP ° ::_:=>_ay__`-- _<- :-: ----------- rI o 0 0- O o LIN LASS. °o o ° p MATCH EXISTING LEVELING ° O ° SCHED 40 PVC �' FILL ° ° O° o COURSE. COMPACT D O O TO 95% MAX. DRY DENS. MANIFOLD PIPE, TYP TOM 90% MAX ° o > DRY DENSITY O 0 ° 0,0 _ O o °O °° MATCH EXISTING SUB -BASE � ° "o 00.0 o O p 0 0 SLOPE PER OSHA 0 2" HIGH DENSITY 00 o° REQUIREMENTS CLOSED -CELL °0 ° ° 1.25" SCHED 40 PVCz FOAM INSULATION NON -FROST SUSCEPTIBLE LATERAL PIPE <FILL COMPACT TO 95% MAX. o DEPTH VARIES DRY DENSITY Li 52' o BURIED PIPE TTODDING 95% MAX. DRY DENST TYP 6" ALL SIDES PIPE 4" SDR 35 PVC OBSERVATION/VENT PI TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION -N.T.S. FOUR TRENCHES PER FIELD AREA 4" SDR 35 PVC NOTES: OBSERVATION/VENT PIPE 1.ORIFICES SHALL FACE UP. FIRST AND LAST ORIFICE WITH CAP SHALL FACE DOWN. PROVIDE A 4" X 4" SPLASH BLOCK DIRECTLY BELOW FIRST AND LAST ORIFICE. BACKFILL 2. SPLASH BLOCK CAN BE 4" THICK LAYER OF 2" WASHED ROCK. 3. SUSPEND LATERALS FROM TOP OF CHAMBER USING SLOPE NGER MATERIAL. NYLO FOR HANGER MATERIAL ISA NOT PERMITTED. FURNISH DRA`=E DESIGN ENGINEER WITH SAMPLE OF HANGER 6' MIN. Z MATERIAL, FOR APPROVAL, BEFORE PURCHASING ° SUPPLY FOR PROJECT. 4. INSTALL HANGERS AT MAX 4 -FEET INTERVAL. LIMITS OF EXCAVATION __ ° 5. ORIFICES SHALL BE 3/16 -INCH DIAMETER AND SPACED 6 -INCHES FROM EACH END, AT 3 -FEET INTERVALS ALONG THE REST OF THE LATERAL. GRAVELLESS CHAMBER 3' BY 4' CALCULATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN CRITERIA TRENCH SPECIFICATIONS RESIDENCE= 5 BEDROOMS ALLOWABLE CHAMBER AREA = 9.87 SF LOADING= 130 GAL/DAY/PERSON NUMBER OF TRENCHES - 10 TOTAL LOADING= q= 1300 GPD LENGTH OF EACH TRENCH - 52 FEET, 13 PERCOLATION RATE= t = 32 MPI CHAMBERS WIDTH OF EACH TRENCH - 3 FEET AREA= 1.75 x Q xVt/5= 2275 SF 50% REDUCTION FOR TRENCHES=,- SF/ MINIMUM NUMBER OF CHAMBERS 31 _v/ TOTAL NUMBER OF CHAMBERS - 131 CHAMBERS TOTAL AREA - 1287 SF CHURCH OWC, LLC FIELD DETAILS Onsite Wastewater Consultants Onsite Wastewater Engineering - Geological Engineering 9590 W. 14th Ave, Suite 100, Lakewood, CO 80215 Voice: (720) 898-3434 Fax: (720) 898-3455 JOB NO. C549 FIGURE 3 I i Typical Two Septic Tank Diagram with Duplex Effluent Pumping System in a Dosing Tank 1. INSTALL TANKS SUCH THAT OUTLET OF PRECEDING TANK IS AT AN ELEVATION TO ALLOW MIN 2% FALL TO INLET OF FOLLOWING TANK FOR ADEQUATE GRAVITY FLOW. 2. SET HIGH WATER ALARM FLOAT ACTIVATION POINT AT 2–INCHES ABOVE PUMP ON FLOAT ACTIVATION POINT. 3. TANKS SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED, TO THE LEVEL OF THE INLET AND OUTLET BEFORE INSTALLING THE CONNECTING PIPES BETWEEN TANKS OR DISCHARGE PIPE OUT OF THE DOSING TANK. NO BRIDGING OF THE PIPE AND BACKFILLING UNDERNEATH SHALL BE ALLOWED. 4. THE PUMP CONTROL PANEL SHALL BE AN ORENCO DAX SERIES DUPLEX CONTROL PANEL. THE PANEL DESIGNATION SPECIFIED AS DAX-2–CS–DS–HT–ETM–CT–PRL–PL–SA. 5. PUMP ACTIVATION FLOAT SEPARATION DISTANCES INDICATED ARE BASED ON A VALLEY PRECAST 1500 GALLON TWO– COMPARTMENT SEPTIC TANK, AND AN INCREMENTAL VOLUME OF 10.1 GALLONS PER INCH. IF A DIFFERENT TANK IS USED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINER TO RECALCUTE THE PUMP ACTIVATION FLOAT ELEVATIONS. THE CALCULATED DOSE VOLUME FOR THE SYSTEM IS 63 GALLONS PER DOSE. 6. ONLY TANKS WITH TOP OVERFLOW FROM THE FIRST TO THE SECOND COMPARTMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED. NO MID BAFFLE FLOW THROUGH TANKS SHALL BE PERMITTED. Slope Ground Away From Riser Inlet Tee Liquid Level 2° 2,000 GAL SINGLE COMPARTMENT CONCRETE TANK Tank Adapter — (cost or bolted) 2" Inspection Access Riser and Lid External PVC Splice Conduit to Control Pane Tank Adapter (cast or bole 1,500 GAL SINGLE COMP CONCRETE TANK Level Fiberglass Gasketed Lid with Stainless Steel Bolts PVC Riser with Grommet(s) (bond to tank adapter with recommended adhesive) — Discharge Assembly Flexible Hoses (2) Effluent Discharge Tank Adapter (cast or bolted) Liquid Level vI — Level Control Float Assembly Check Valve Vault Inlet Ports ok Flow Inducer (2) Effluent Pumps Q Lq o C ¢ Drain Port > ¢ Filter Cartridge Z — Biotube® Pump Vault Orenco Systems Incorporated 814 AIRWAY AVENUE SUTHERLIN, OREGON 97479-9012 TELEPHONE: (541) 459-4449 FACSIMILE: (541) 459-2884 CHURCH OWC LLC LOT 94 STARWOOD No. Revision Date DRAWN BY RWW CHECKED BY: 1AI EOC Onsite Wastewater Consultants DATE: 05/2007 Onsite Wastewater Engineering - Geological Engineering SEPTIC TANKS 9590 W. 14th Ave., Ste 100, Lakewood, CO 80215 JOB NO. C349 Voice: (720) 898-3434 Fax: (720) 898-3455 FIGURE 4 a �� 0 z 0 m E w z IQ W CD W N� C= Q o C�l- Q u uw=.. O= u--, �_ o i O 7 c p m CT 0 — C 0 z 0 m C) ti v co N N (N 1991 `(Hal) PeaH olweuAa lejoi a) CD CD L CD O O Iti O Y7 O to 0 �Ci O O O tb 0 O N O ,rO N e!' O N N et M W N It N C O M O M to t� N t� r 0 N Cu - ..0 N O N N 7 O m � :3- N U co N N U C C O N 7 O C C U C U Q >o c v � rn �� ..1 N c� O U l6 d CJ N a ... N O N N U CO J N '� O N Q0 2 O C Q_ p� ~ d L 0 IE Q o N Q N E O a Q i 'C N fn ca D z -' co g A R 2 3 c c 41 A] IQ W tq o a K' N 111} R O �' a d M n �= n o o c C) ti v co N N (N 1991 `(Hal) PeaH olweuAa lejoi a) CD CD L CD O O Iti O Y7 O to 0 �Ci O O O tb 0 O N O ,rO N e!' O N N et M W N It N C O M O M to t� N t� r 0 N Cu - ..0 N O N N 7 O m � :3- N U co N N U C C O N 7 O C C U C U Q >o c v � rn �� ..1 N c� O U l6 d CJ N a ... N O N N U CO J N '� O N Q0 2 O C Q_ p� ~ d L 0 IE Q o N Q N E O a Q i 'C N fn ca D z -' co g A R 2 3 c c 41 A] z m a, IN W 0 Z W0 Ln�- O g r J D J O (n m Z 0 w Z �� UHLln� CHURCH OWC, LLC Onsite Wastewater Consultants Onsite Wastewater Engineering -Geological Engineering 9590 W. 14th Ave., Ste. 100, Lakewood, CO 80215- Voice: 0215Voice: (720) 898-3434 Fax: (720) 898-3455 J J __ cn w U) w � FJ - o 0 0 Q W O _j O � Q p p W C> W � O � a � O O W N O � } Z O (n p Z ZJ E O pJ O Q =Q a J O� OW Q =W 'tN O U) z C14 p W g z UO (n L, z <o< Q Z� ZN O p0 p� CV QZ Q0 0 _� _> p CO �p wz:D zQ N� Of(,()W W lJi Z Iii 0 0 . Z N N AUTOMATIC DISTRIBUTION VALVE JOB NO. C349 DATE: 05/2007 FIGURE 6 Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 Pitkin County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer Property Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Information Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail Photographs Tax Area Par Account Number cel Number 2007 Mill Levy 042 R003601 264335107007__IF40.2 Owner Name and Address ISTARWOOD 94 LLC C/O MARK FRIEDLAND 205 S MILL ST #301B ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description SUB:STARWOOD BLK:16 LOT:R-94 DESC: STARWOOD SIXTEEN Location cal Address: 70 LARSON DR ASPEN Subdivision:STARWOOD Land Acres: 2.63 Land Sq Ft: 10 2008 Property Tax Valuation Information Actual Value �j Assessed Value Land: 2,250,000 179,100 Improvements: 300,000 23,880 Total: 1 2,550,000 F 202,980 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountNumber=RO03601 8/11/2008 W, Pitkin County Environmental Health & Natural Resources Department Permit for an Individual Sewage Disposal System 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-5077 REPLACES PERMIT # 07017 Permit # 07040 Parcel ID # 2643-351-07-007 Type of permit New(x) Repair() Addition/Remodel to House( ) Name of Owner Street Address Lot 94 Starwood, LLC 256 Larson Dr, Aspen, CO Property legal description Size of lot 2.63 Water source Commun # of bedrooms in house Lot 94, Blk 16 Starwood ublic Water Total square footage of the h istem — Starwood Metro Di ,000 (plans dated 4/14/2007) 5 # of offices, lofts & similar ' ekr!Noms in h use `b Caretaker unit Total square footage of the caret k unit # of bedrooms in caretaker unit # of offices, is i rims ir&_ taker unit Designed for what # rooms (list) FIVE Bedrooms Permit information Designed by Church OWC, LLC Mailing Address PO Box 527 Wheat Ridge CO 80034-0527 Perc rate 32 Profile hole depth 9.5 ft Depth to groundwater or bedrock Minimum Septic tank capacity 2844gallons Minimum Absorption area Comments > 9.5 ft 2574sf / 50%redu= 1287sf Septic permit approved per compliance with the engineer design and specifications dated May 4, 2007, Project # C349. Any changes must be approved by this department and the design engineer prior to them being made. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the Pitkin County ISDS regulations. Design is for a 2000 gallon one -compartment septic tank followed by a 1500 gallon two-compartment septic tank with dual effluent pumps in a Biotube pump vault. Effluent is pumped to two sets of trenches, each set with 5 trenches with Quick4 gravelless chambers for a total of 131 chambers. This department does not endorse any brand of products. This ,permit must be kept on-site during installation. The engineer must do a final inspection of the installation and submit an as -built letter to this department. This department must also be called for an inspection with a minimum of 48 hours advanced notice. The owner has the responsibility that all components are inspected and maintained on a regular basis by qualified personnel. Revegetation over the area of the field is very important for the functioning of the system. Pitkin County has guidelines that must be followed to assure the plants that are introduced are appropriate for the conditions of the area. The use of native plants is strongly encouraged. Permit approved by: 1, d t Date: S U� Plans and specifications of the pr sed individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Dep rtment. As -built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Expiration Date: Installer: License Number: Final approval: , Date: PITKIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10, Aspen Colorado 81611 Phone (970) 920-5070 Fax (970) 920-5077 Name of OWNER hO- I I I Owner's Mailing Address 4 City State Zi0 Home Phone: Name ?�Wb, LLC ,ve lso h Drt V4 61I E-mail Address: Business Phone: p 411- C37 -5- t, . 3zS Primary Contact Person (all communication regarding this permit will go through this person) Contact Mailing Address 41 17 LL5C`1 of %v4 c0 1 t46 (( Business Phone: �l %CJ – 6 1$ City, State, Zip 14 r 6;Z Cell Phone Fax : Z - F6q E-mail Address: 5P 5W fer-o> • Ce'2r Parcel ID # (available from assessor's office 26 LI 3 O - o --7 sessor. at 920-5160 or at www pitkinaso ) — — - — — — - — Building Permit # (if available) - Street address of property 256 1 VC v Legal Description: Lot 1_ ,Block A ,Filing Subdivision Size of lot: 2 .4 3 acres. Type of proposed structure: 5 F Total square feet of house S 75U # of bedrooms (potential) in house ink ►ides yhe.�-� . Caretaker Unit: Attached ( ) Detached ( ) Total areas . ft. of caretaker unit # of bedrooms otential in caretaker unit Permit is for: New Home ( Repair due to failure ( ) Remodel/Addition ( ) Emergency use ( ) Water: Private well ( ) Spring ( ) Stream ( ) Community/Public Water System( If community system: Name of system S%p 2_1,000 ly 1� ►CST The fee for a ISDS application is $600 for a permit that takes 6 hours or less for the department to approve. If approval takes longer than 6 hours, a rate of $100 per hour will be charged. The maximum fee is $1000. The basic fee of $600 is due at the time of application. The remainder, if any, will be due in two stages: first, at the time of issuance of the ISDS permit; second, before final approval of the ISDS permit. Application for an individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accurate information on locations of all existing and proposed wells, contour intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes, waterlines, springs, suction or irrigation lines, drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, floodplains, dry gulches, and existing septic systems. I hereby certify that any such features not shown on attached site map are not present. Issuance of the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may be undertaken until all approvals and permits have been obtained. The Pitkin County Environmental Health Department, Pitkin County and employees of these agencies will be held harmless should the individual sewage disposal system fail or malfu 'on. The permit to construct is issued on information submitted by the applicant or his/her representatives. The owney ssu s � 11 respo n case of failure of the system. Signature of applicant ,) Date 1 Il 07 Received by Receipt # Date e 4,?- o% HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL September 12, 2006 Shannon Sweeney Hen-A-Piw ak Geotechnical. kn_- 5020 C:ounte Roa r Glenwood Spine~. Cobra= Phone: 9701-945-7 4;.: Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpgec�hpgeotech.com P.O. Box 6728 Snowmass Village, Colorado 81615 Job No. 106 0662 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed Residence, Lot 94, Starwood, Larson Drive, Pitkin County, Colorado Dear Ms. Sweeney: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated July 21, 2006. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a 5,000 square -foot building with 2 stories of wood frame construction over a walkout basement level with an attached garage located on the site as shown on Figure 1. Basement and garage floors are proposed to be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 4 to 12 feet. Foundation loadings are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The septic disposal system is proposed to be located northeast and downhill of the proposed residence. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The site was vacant and is located at the south (uphill) side of Larson Drive. The ground surface slopes moderately steeply down to the north at grades between about 25 to 33 percent. There is about 18 feet of elevation difference across the proposed building footprint and slopes in the area around the building footprint are less than 30%. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds with aspen trees and brush. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits in the building area at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 2 feet of topsoil, generally consist of sandy clay with scattered sandstone fragments at Pit 1. The clay soils became more silty with depth at Pit 1. Results of swell - consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the clay soils, presented on Figures 3 and 4, typically indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading, and a low expansion potential when wetted. The sample from Pit 1 at 9 feet showed a low collapse potential (settlement under constant Parker 303-841-7119 a Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 e Silverthornu 970-468-1989 -2 - load) when wetted. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf for support of the proposed residence. Footings should also be designed for a minimum dead load pressure of 600 psf. The soils possess a variable settlement/potential and the bearing conditions should be further evaluated at the time of construction. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Topsoil and loose, disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to firm undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation and Retaining Walls: Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site clay soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site clay soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moistu; a content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Passive pressure of compacted Job No. 106 0662 t �� �ZCCh -3 - backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. The clay soils possess an expansion potential and there could be some slab distress, especially if the subgrade soils are wetted. Expansive soils encountered below slabs should be subexcavated up to a maximum depth of 2 feet and replaced with %-inch road base compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area and where clay soils are present that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 %2 feet deep. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. Drying could increase the expansion potential of the clay soils. Job No. 106 0662 cg -4- 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site clay soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A Swale may be needed uphill to direct surface runoff around the residence. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 10 feet from the building. Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on July 26, 2006 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. A profile pit (Pit 1) and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Figure 1. The test holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the profile pit shown on Figure 2 and consist of 2 feet of topsoil overlying sandy clay with scattered sandstone fragments. The percolation test results are presented in Table 1. Percolation test results indicate infiltration rates between 20 and 45 minutes per inch with an average of 32 minutes per inch. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. Pitkin County requires that a registered professional engineer design the infiltration septic disposal system. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the Job No. 106 0662 Ge tech -5 - project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. DREG -. OV. 4�. 4 - Trevor L. Knell, P 3846 Reviewed by: [Vaniel E. Hardin, TLK/ksw attachments Figure 1 — Location of Exploratory Pits and Percolation Test Holes Figure 2 — Logs of Exploratory Pits Figures 3 and 4 — Swell -Consolidation Test Results Table 1 — Percolation Test Results cc: Waylon Weatherhead — Architect HP Geotech — Andy Kosse (Silverthorne) Job No. 106 0662 Gly gtech PIT 1 PIT 2 ELEV.=350' ELEV.=368' 0 0 W W W W U- ' 55 U- 2 f- wC=9.5 DD=116 = ~ CL W WC=10.9 DD=118 CL W WC=11.8 10 DD_86 10 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; sandy clay and silt, firm, slightly moist, brown, organic with roots. CLAY (CL); sandy, scattered sandstone fragments and silty with depth at Pit 1, medium stiff to very stiff, slightly moist to moist, reddish brown to brown, calcareous. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on July 24, 2006 with a small trackhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were determined in the field by the client and measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) 1060662 t@C�'1 LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 2 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Moisture Content = 11.8 percent 0 Dry Density = 86 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay 1 From: Pit 1 at 9 Feet 2 z O w 3 U) cr Compression a upon O4 wetting 5 6 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf ) 106 0662I treCrl HEPWORTI^ ^w I SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 3 Moisture Content= 10.9 percent Dry Density = 118 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 1 at 6 Feet Z 1 O U) z a 0 x w z 1 O w °C 2 a 0 Expansion v upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf ) Moisture Content = 11.8 percent 0 Dry Density = 86 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay 1 From: Pit 1 at 9 Feet 2 z O w 3 U) cr Compression a upon O4 wetting 5 6 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf ) 106 0662I treCrl HEPWORTI^ ^w I SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 3 0 z O a) z Q a x W z O U) U) w e= a O U Moisture Content = 9.5 percent Dry Density = 11.6 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 2 at 5 Feet 1 0 1 2 Expansion upon 3 wetting .1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE (ksf) 100 1060662 H�' cx-ivtecii SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4 HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHnnce HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 106 0662 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MINJINCH) P-1 37 15 7% 6 45 6 5 '/4 3/4 5 '/4 4% 3/4 4% 4 '/2 4 3 3/4 '/4 3% 3 1/2 '/a P-2 50 15 8% 6% 2 20 6 3/4 5 '/2 1 '/4 51/2 4 '/a 1 '/a 4'/4 3'/4 1 3 '/4 2 1/2 3/4 2 '/2 2 '/2 P-3 37 15 81/4 63/4 1 '/2 30 63/4 6 3/4 6 5 '/4 3/4 5 '/4 41/4 '/2 4% 4 '/4 '/2 4'/4 3% 1/2 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on July 25, 2006. Percolation tests were conducted on July 25, 2006. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test. S'�AoRWOO D METROPOLITAN DISTRICT 0121 Stewart Drive • Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone 970.925.8939 Fax 970.925.5870 December 8, 2006 Shannon Sweeney 41 Danielson Drive Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Water Tap Fee, Tract R-94 Dear Shannon, Please see the enclosed Tap Privilege Fee Worksheet in the amount of $36,300.00 for your proposed residence on Tract R-94, 0256 Eppley Drive. Payment should be made to the Starwood Metropolitan District and is due before construction begins. If you have any questions, please call me at 925-8939. Thank you. Ju aJohnston, Secretary Starwood Metropolitan District Enclosure cc: Starwood Metropolitan District Bill Lukes Meg Haynes EOR Value New EQR Existing Total Additional per unit Units COST BEDROOMS (including caretaker) 5 5 0.2 1 $11,000 BATHROOMS (including caretaker) 5 0.2 0 $0 Lav 7 7 0.05 0.35 $3,850 Shower Ma,dmum 25 GPM B 50 PSI 5 5 0.05 0.25 $2,750 Tub 4 4 0.05 0.2 $2,200 Toilet Maxdnwm 3.5 gallons per Nish 5 5 0.05 0.25 $2,750 Bidet 0 0.05 0 $0 Steam Room 1 1 0.05 0.05 $550 Other 0 0.05 0 $0 MUDROOM Lavatory 1 1 0.05 0.05 $550 Other 0 0.05 0 $0 POWDER ROOM 0 Lavatory 2 2 0.05 0.1 $1,100 Toilet 2 2 0.05 0.1 $1,100 STUDIO 0 Sink 0 0.05 D $0 Interior hose bib 0 0.05 0 $0 GYM 0 Lavatory 0 0.05 0 $0 Toilet 0 0.05 0 $0 Cold Plunge 0 0.2 0 $0 Spa 0 0.2 0 $0 Stearn Room 0 0.05 0 $0 Shower 0 0.05 0 $0 Interior hose b) 0 0.05 0 $0 KITCHENS (including caretaker) 1 1 Sink 1 1 0.05 0.05 $550 Dishwasher 1 1 0.05 0.05 $550 icemaker (in refrigerator) 1 1 1 0.05 0.05 $550 Icemaker (separate) 0 0.05 0 $0 Bar Sink 1 1 0.05 0.05 $550 Other Faucets 0 0.05 0 $0 Pantry Sink 0 0.05 0 $0 Hot Water Dispenser 1 1 0.05 0.05 $550 LAUNDRY WashM Machine 1 1 0.1 0.1 $1,100 Lanxlry Sink 1 1 0.1 0.1 $1,100 Addl Laundry Foctures 0 0.1 0 $0 Other 0 0.05 0 $0 OTHER INTEMOR FDaURES Wet Bar 2 2 0.05 0.1 $1,100 Icemaker 0 0.05 0 $0 1 Dishwasher 1 1 0.05 0.05 $550 I Water Softener 1 1 1 0.05 0.05 $550 Connected Humidifiers 1 0 0.05 0 $0 Service Sinks 0 0.05 0 $0 i STYrI00e ee0eaille mow. e 1 t/dM2e06 I... f OF 2 "A STARWOOD METROPOLITAN I DISTRICT First Wall Hydrant 3/4" maximum TAP PRIVILEGE FEE WORKSHEET LOT NO. R-94 0.05 OWNER SWEENEY ('rf approved) NEW / REMODEL NEW RESIDENCE PLANS DATED NOVEMBER 29, 2006 Third Wall Hydrant EQR VALUE $11,000.00 EQR Value New EQR Existing Total Additional per unit Units COST EXTERIOR FIXTURES I First Wall Hydrant 3/4" maximum 1 1 0.05 0.05 $550 Second Wall Hydrant ('rf approved) 1 10.1 0.1 $1,100 Third Wall Hydrant (if proved) 0 0.15 0 $0 Fourth Wall Hydrant (if approved) 0 0.2 0 $0 Fountain (recycling) 0 0.2 0 $0 Other 0 varies 0 $0 POOLS AND HOT TUBS Hot Tubs [1'300 gall 1 1 0.1 0.1 $1,100 [300 -10,000 gaQ 0 0.2 0 $0 Pools 0 0 0 $0 [1 unit (.2 EQR) per 10,000 gaQ 0 0.2 0 $0 GARAGES Sinks 0 0.05 0 $0 Interior Hose Bb 1 1 0.05 0.05 $550 I APPROVED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Sinks 0 0.05 0 $0 Lavatories 0 0.05 0 $0 Toilets 0 0.05 0 $0 Tubs 0 0.05 0 $0 I Showers 0 0.05 0 $0 Other Icemaker 0 0.051 0 $0 TOTAL NEW EQR'S CALCULATION OF TAP FEE - PRELIMINARY NOTES: 1 Applicant should review the Stanwood Water District Rules and Regulations for requirements pertaining to approval of plans, inspections, construction procedures, and usage. 2 EQR unit values above are based on fixtures meeting the water conservation requirements of the Rules and Regulations, nonconforming fixtures, if approved by the Board, will be charged a higher EQR unit value. 3 The final tap privilege fee for a new customer or for an increase of EQR values shall be calculated and made based on an inspection by the District as of the date of a Certificate of Occupancy. 4 Approval is required for any water service larger than 3/4" for a customer having an EQR of 1.4 or less, or 1" for a customer having an EQR of greater than 1.4 5 All new customers and all customers requesting an increase in EQR shall install an approved Pressure Reducing Valve with a maximum pressure setting of 50 psig. 6 All customers must install approved meters. 7 Use of new or modified water service prior to final inspection and approval by the Starwood Water District will result in fines as specked in the Rules and Regulations 8 Only one outside hydrant is permitted for each customer unless additional are specifically authorized by the Board in writing. Each additional hydrant shall have an EQR equal to .05 more than the previous hydrant. 3.3 536,300 ?0"1 __1 ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS,- for Pitkin Owner's Name Lot 94 Starwood Parcel ID # House Size (sq. ft.) (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 130 Number of Bedrooms in Main House 5 Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit 0 (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow .1300 State Review Required? no Perc Rate '." ;32! (T) Design Flow (Q) = # potential bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 2275 Minimum tank capacity 2843.75 gallons Absorption Area (=Q/5 X SQRT perc rate) A = 2,574 sq. ft. of absorption area required 166 gravelless_chatb thout reduction # of Perc Holes Re iced: 3 UICK 4 9_8 V A = 1286.9343 sq.ft. with 50% reductionTRENCHES 131 graveness chamber units with reductio STANDARD A = 1286. sq.ft. with 50% r onTRENCHES 83 graveness chamber units with reduction EQ 36 81 EQ36 units in TRENCHES QUICK4-EQ36 1287 166 SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 202 SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH . # of feet = 152 SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = 127 DICK 4 9.2 1801.7081 sq ft 30% reduction BED 196 chamber units with reduc. 1801.7081 sq ft 30% reduction BED 116 chamber units with reduc. 144 EQ36 units in a BED 1802 282 Pitkin County Environmental Health & Natural Resources Department Permit for an Individual Sewage Disposal System 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-5077 Permit # 07017 Parcel ID # 2643-351-07-007 Type of permit New(x) Repair( ) Addition/Remodel to House( ) Name of Owner Lot 94 Starwood, LLC Street Address 256 Larson Dr, Aspen, CO Property legal description Lot 94, Blk 16 Starwood Size of lot 2.63 Total square footage of the house 5750 Water source Community/Public Water System — Starwood Metro District # of bedrooms in house 5 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house Caretaker unit Total square footage of the caretaker unit # of bedrooms in caretaker unit # of offices, lofts & similar sized Designed for what # rooms (list) FIVE Bedrooms Permit information Designed by Church OWC, LLC Mailing Address PO Box 527 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-0527 rooms in caretaker unit, 0 Perc rate 32 Profile hole depth 9.5 ft Depth to groundwater or edrock Minimum Septic tank capacity 2188 gallons bsorption area Comments > 9.5 ft 1980sf / 50%redu= 990sf Septic permit approved per compliance with the engineer design and specifications dated March 20, 2007, Project #C349. Any changes must be approved by this department and the design engineer prior to them being made. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the Pitkin County ISDS regulations. Design is for a 2500 gallon two-compaent septic tank wi dual effluent pumps in a Biotube pump vault. Effluent is pumped to two sets of trenches, eac et with 4 trenche :with 13 Quick4 gravelless chambers per trench for a total of 104 chambers. This department does not endorse Any brand of products. This permit must be kept on-site during installation. The engineer must do a final inspection of the installation and submit an as -built letter to this department. This department must also be called for an inspection with a minimum of 48 hours advanced notice. 4_ The owner has the responsibility that ail componen are inspected and maintained on a regular basis by qualified personnel. Revegetation over the area of the field is very i orta for the functioning of the system. Pitkin County has guidelines that must be followed to assure the plants that are introduced ar priate for the conditions of the area. The use of native plants is strongly encouraged. Permit approved by:&&:::I�AA)Date: d Plans and specifications of the prop sed individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Expiration Date: / C l `% i Installer: License Number: Final approval: Date: Page 1 of 1 Nancy Mackenzie From: Nancy Mackenzie Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 4:38 PM To: 'Ed Church' Cc: Ispsweeney@hotmail.com' Subject: Shannon sweeney 256 larson Drive - resubmitted septic design Ed, I just looked over the design we received 3/7/07 and have the following comments: 1) This design letter has the same date as the first one you submitted, January 03, 2007. This is very confusing. We have said before that everything should have a new date and the the Figure pages should show the new date. 2) The perc test holes are not evenly distributed over the proposed absorption field area. They are all clustered below and south. 3) You did not verify the pipe sizes as I requested. Are you pumping from the tank to the distribution box/distribution valves through a 4" pipe? 4) You did not state what you are designing to maintain equal distribution as requested. Exactly what are using? Figure 2 show distribution valves and Figure 3 show a flow splitter basin? Please provide specs. Nancy MacKenzie 970-920-5076 Pitkin County Environmental Health & Natural Resources Department Environmental Health Specialist 3/15/2007 Page 1 of 1 Nancy Mackenzie From: Nancy Mackenzie Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 4:32 PM To: 'Ed Church' Cc: 'spsweeney@hotmail.com' Subject: 256 Larson Drive - Shannon Sweeney RE: Job No. C349 Ed, I started a review of your design and have the following concerns/questions: 1) There is no figure 5 in my packet. 2) Figure 6 states the field should be rested every 6 months and this is not allowed in our regulations 3) The location of the perc and profile holes is not indicated on your design. Are they evenly distributed in the area of the trenches as required by our regulations? 4) Please verify the size of the pipes from the tank to the Distribution Valves. Are you pumping to these through 4" pipes as shown on Figure 2? 5) Figure 3, typical plan view, seems to conflict with Figure 6, Distribution Valves. Exactly what are you designing to maintain equal distribution to the trenches? Nancy MacKenzie 970-920-5076 Sr. Environmental Health Specialist Pitkin County Environmental Health & Natural Resources Department 2/26/2007 ... , I I SHEET TITLE .'- LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN r1l 111 CA % S CA m 10 NOTICE: According to Colorado low you must Commencetan , legalactionaction based upon any defect In this survey within three years after you firs discover 1sc such defect. In no event may any action based upon any defect In this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon. 0- 4 0 0 94 affil W IN W 4 0; LOT 9 4STARWOOD LLC 2 G 7 ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN REVIEW 15-30% GRADE 3-010-45% GRADE 45%ABOVE GRADE LOT R-94 STARWOOD SUBDIVISION PARCEL ID # 264335107007 vicinity map % 534156 Page: I of I 02/06/2007 10:28 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 11.00 D 0.00 HIRED GUN SURVEYING LTD. P.O. BOX 9 SNOWMASS, COLORADO 81654 (970)923-2794 SITE N R T H 1# = 30 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT R-94, STARWOOD SIXTEEN SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF FILED IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 281 Legend INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED. Notes - THE CONTOUR LEVEL IS TWO (2) FEET. TOPO INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A MAP PRODUCED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS MARCH OF 1989 TOPO INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A MAP PRODUCED &"IVIIX �=LOM AUR 511E PLAN REVIEW WAIVER APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE/SHE HAS BEEN INFORMED BY PITKIN COUNTY OF THE EXISTENCE OF ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN EINVIRONMEN TAL HAZARD AREAS THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE PROPERTY, ANY IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE USE AND OCCUPANCY THEREOF, THE PROVISIONS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY REGULATIONS DO NOT IN ANY WAY ASSURE OR IMPLY THAT AREAS OUTSIDE OF DESIGNATED HAZARD AREAS WILL BE FREE FROM HAZARDS, OR THAT APPROVED MITIGATION MEASURES WILL GUARANTEE THE SAFETY OF ANY PROPERTY. OWNER/APPLICANT:'����.: THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN REVIEW HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THIS-Z.-LDAY OF ,2_b_, SUBJECT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DETERMINATION NO. Q a - A00Z RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 5; 33�3 7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR cosc. Plbti ACCEMNr.E FOR R9CQaQjNG THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN REVIEW HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY.QF PITKI STATE OF COLORADO,AT&aj-O'CLOCK,-k--M. THIS &V- DAY OF IN PLAT BOOK AT/PAGE —. AS RECEPTION NUMBERS DATE SURVEYED: 8-16-06 DATE DRAFTED: 8-17-06 REVISED: 0 DATA FILE NAME: 0608181 DRAWN BY:TY