The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.eh.246725300591 (1995)parcel lu f# ASPEN%Pt ` ? ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DPARTMI APPLICATION FOR AN D[VIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM CS) PERMIT Name of OWNER — Bus. Phone # J Mailing Address Home Phone # Name of AGENT Bus. Phone # Mailing Address- Home Phone # :Copy of Permit to be Sent to: ERMIT IS FOR: () NEW INSTALLATION, () REPAIR, () ALTERATION NOT DUE TO FAILURE, or () EMERGENCY USE. for permit # _ 3TREET ADDRESS of Property: IFGAL DESCRIPTION of Property: lot _, block _, filing _, and subdiv. 31ze of Lot acres Type of Structure Proposed # BEDROOMS _, # LOFTS _ , # GARBAGE DISPOSALS , # DISHWASHERS _, # CLOTHES WASHERS _. Water Supply: O Private Well, O Spring, O Stream, or O System (Public. or Private Name: ) S PROOF OF ADEQUATE WATER ATTACHED? O YES or O NO HAS THIS PROJECT BEEN APPROVED BY PMN COUNTY? O YES or O NO 4ppfkation for an Individual sewege disposal system permit Is hereby submitted The undefsigned acknowledges that the above Norma is hue and that fake Information will Invalidate the application and any subsequent permit issuance of the permit does not explicitly or knpf+cidy imply the approval of any oilmen permit required for eoraLvctiion pursuant to Pitkin County codes- No construction may be undertaken anW an approvals and permits have been obtained. The owner assumes all responsib7fies In case of fallure or Inadequacy of this system - SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Date the application becomes invalid !PE) day from the date signed. This Permit is valid only for the design as specified below - 4, fK 4k.s «._:«««:«_««««««:«««_«__««=.«•gELON/ FOR OFFICE USE INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT # " ci SCS 1 1$150 fee paid (1Yes. Date received /0 —/0 "4� Receipt # -M Received By kL(J DESIGN CRITERIA/OF SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED: Any changes must be submitted and approved in writing. r of Bedrooms: tp Percolation Rate: � mpi, AYefa�l n Flow: gallons. �Tr(QSE ' 7 �ow ► I Y Is an Engineer Designed system needed? (.Y/Yes or () No (m plans and specifications of the engineer shall be followed. Any changes must be approved in writing and the engineer shall certify the rind Installation to the Environmental Health Department in wfitin9) /,- dW�-}(�.- ,etiw& ,k4rd Min mum Septic Tank Capacity ,3000 gallons Absorption Area square feet minimum fr)JAbsorption Bed, O Absorption Field in Trenches, O Gravel -less system, (.,Pumping/Dosing Chamber, O Absorption Pit lel/ ��hA�S tla' sand lir calsy�td k •D Chu~r�c� d dalCd GilSf ns d s cr mu.s�- �-{oil�tu�d • Ant rrhrc��Cs rnus� b•t _ u,PProv�c� b y �- e�ly%��•' � �r.+".s dC�rfrrYr�� Stages re wiring inspection: () Before excavation, ()Upon completion and prior to placement of gravel, (Kefore covering distribution system of absorption Feld, (mor to backfill of any component and any situation deemed necessary by Environmental Health Department Staff. ^tans and specifications of the proposed Individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or his agent to perform the work indicated above in accordance with the Pltkln County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations In effect on the date of issue• in addition to general provisions set forth in any attachments, this Permit is subject to the fo4lowing addtionai terms and conditions If any: APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY: DATE OF ISSUE: The above individual sewage disposal system has leen Inspected for by the itkin Environmental Health Department The owner assumes all responsibilities In case of failure or hadequacy of this ystem. Complete as -built drawing and eft specifications of as -built a Included this pe ! SINAL INSPECTION BY: _ ✓r " DATE OF FINAL INSPECTION: 9a OTH {lDp:,iTCPCivP:PEFlMIT.9.t 730 G "T" ET ASPEN, COI.OnA00 81611 i'1-f('N1E303.920.5070 FAX 303.920.5197 -16H0 1/94 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - - - �( seiha45 nuisf ke ua,=A,`ned • % alis .lcc vrl !o' mush h� u.�i�n i;,cci . Ctosesf �jj�- 6, `k+.e.. _Xtocl Name of Owner 11 Iwory c Lo tr►• 1At B iness Phone T : e of $triicture Mailin :Address .` Q #`! .ono«.<`Vl , me Phone ; # `of Lofts Name .of A ent :.... � rt.<! r j. Business Phone # of Similar Rooms' -..- 1V ailin9. Address .. g ' ',•, Fw' Home Phone Size of. Lot acres T : e of $triicture of Bedrooms . ' .^ ; # `of Lofts # of Offices # of Similar Rooms' -..- Size of House S : ft.)'d . Aspen / Pitkin Environmental Health Department Contact Log Sheet Name: �lc<� clo lc�ni Parcel ID#: 253 - - S I' / Address: /n1 �J U6L-II Date Person Spoken To Comments / Action to be Taken Initials J "V -S I s 1 ori o k 51, Z'" 916 i .5;2-e- e( (o (c( h ' G � C(ri (f � a �'iC[.L '_ ✓' r'i f S `S w i I;Ze d s sQ -� I s' also 1/7 will r ec + 1 L- /o - C u,� 11 ut rc S �Jzs-sG ro 1 - 44.4;+ A t- wss Coy h ;,, �k e r ( a i /' i. ltl P S O� 1 d 41,, W 6. C W WQ 1` �1G✓l lC fir "Oe h 1 5 tttt n 4# a e4 '4 - Cd 0 h, T,'o b f u `s ' d s n, n 4- dP G. t Sur u at !� (Would ins4afL e�1d s+ e h s H �i II rt o e o! or r - 'S r3 ce ,( A z- d 1 s d / 5' T DATE �' TIME FOR -----__ M PHON OF Yo' PHONE AREA CODE -NUMBER EXTENSION PLEA MESSAGE WILL w, AGA CAME C[G'l fiV9 SEE W ANI TOPS FORM 4003 SI NED December 31, 1996 Byrnes & Associates, Ltd.. P.O. Box 589 Snowmass Village, Co. 81615 Re: Chapman Fishing Lodge Dear Mr. Byrnes: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT On November 1, 1996, ,1 inspected the installation of the subsurface drain which was constructed to divert the groundwater and irrigation water from reaching the leach field on the referenced property. The subsurface drain was installed to the engineer's specifications (letter and design dated July 29, 1996) to at least a depth of 12 inches of gravel around the northern and eastern portion of the leach field and also around.the southeastern portion of the tanks. The integrity of the tanks was also inspected by this Department and the contractor. All inlets, outlets and their seals were examined, and the risers were sealed: Please contact this Department,if there are any further questions or concerns. Sincerely, Betse, Kip Environmental Health Officer cc: Don Cramer J. Nicholas McGrath 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • PHONE 303.920.5070 FAx 303.920.5197 Printed m re yded paper Am M--- , I %W E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS December 9, 1996 Byrnes & Associates, Ltd. Y.U. BOX 589 Snowmass village, 81615 LUC1 2- 1996 ENVIRONMENIHEALTH Asp>�:N j PITKIN Subject: installation Report - Subsurface Drain Chapman Fishing Lodge Tract 10, Lot 8, Aspen River valley Ranch Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6726 Dear Mr. Byrnes, We and our representative Bob Nelson observed the installation of the subsurface drain at the septic tank and above the field at the subject site. The installation was required because of seasonal ground water and described in our letter of July 29, 1996. The risers at the septic tank and 'lift station were i0water-proofed' to minimize infiltration to the tanks. A subsurface drain was then installed from the tanks, along the east side of the field and then westward to a positive gravity outlet. The drain was installed in general conformance with recommendations of our July 29, 1996 'letter. if there are an Call . �ar•�••.•••Z f.X Alit c 13172 E. 0. Edward G. 2 copies sent S, or if we can be of further service, please E6 AL E; cc: Nelson Environmental cc: Pitkin County Environmental Health, A�T1�N: Betsy Kipp 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80437-2869 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 EOC E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Julv 29, 1996 Byrnes & Associates, ATTN: Jim Byrnes P.O. BOX 5889 Snow -mass Village, CC Ltd. 81615 _O� J U L 3 1 1996 �# ENVIrROWMENTAL HEALCH ASPEN / PITKIN Subject: Ground Water and Proposed Subsurface Drain Chapman Fishing Lodge Tract 10, Lot b, Aspen River Valley Ranch Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6726 Dear Mr. Byrnes, We met with you and Bob Nelson on July 18, 1996 at the site to observe the onsite wastewater system (OWS). The system was designed in our letter of November 10, 1995. This spring there has been ground water above the 2.5 feet identified by Hepworth Pawlak in their subsurface investigation 195 401. We understand ground water was observed at a depth of 1 foot during the spring and there was surface irrigation being done at the same time. The surface irrigation has been stopped, although we believe some irrigating can be done this fall to establish vegetation above the mound. To lower the seasonal water level, we recommend installation of a subsurface drain. The drain should consist of an excavated trench to a minimum depth 1 foot below the top of the second septic tank which gravity outlets to the northwest. The alignment of the drain and a cross section are presented on Figs. 1 and 2. With excavation of the trench, a minimum of 4 inches of 1.5 inch gravel should be placed, then installation of a 4 inch perforated pipe, then placement to establish a total of at 12 incites of gravel. The pipe should a mini- mum slope of 1% downward from the second septic tank. When the drain is installed, the connection between the "risers" and tanks and risers themselves should be waterproofed. If there are any E. O. CHURCH, Edward O. 3 copies sent lease call. cc: Aspen/Pitkin Health Department, ATTN: Betsy Kipp cc: Nelson Environmental and Wastewater Systems 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80437-2869 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 1�m LOT B. TRACT 10 SCALE . -ASPEN RIVER VALLEY RANCH F - 50' ' PITKIN AUNTY. COLORADO i APPROXIMATE DATION R DITCH ALIGNMENT. t ` i / \ PROPOSED \ \ SUBSURFACE / / DRAIN \ A Z Z v Lu Lli `I L_ c� w— Q LL LL of LJ LL � J \\ C' Q LL LLJ V 0 LU o- 0 O J LL n W Q N C7 LL Q LU U Q LL m LL O Z O u LU O JOB NO. G`?-,�, Z E. 0. CHURCH. INC. SHEET OF ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Pre,,X��5�9n PROJECT CLIENT J. NICHOLAS McGRATH, P.C. A Professional Corporation Attorneys At Law J. Nicholas McGrath* Susan W. Laatsch Diana L. Godwin June 25, 1996 Byrnes & Associates Ltd. P.O. Box 5889 Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Re: Sewage pollution of Wheatley Ditch Dear Mr. Byrnes: 600 East Hopkins Avenue Suite 203 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone [970] 925-2612 Facsimile [970] 925-4402 CompuServe 74020,150 nicklaweksn.net I represent the Dart Family, which owns the ranch downstream from you. As you know from the ranch foreman, Don Cramer, the septic system on the house you are building for Chapman is malfunctioning. Mr. Cramer indicates that raw (but diluted) sewage is entering the Wheatley Ditch, which provides irrigation to the Dart property. That sewage is polluting the several lakes on the Dart property, and potentially the Roaring Fork River beyond the lakes. In addition, it could pollute the two wells servicing the houses on the Dart property. This is to demand that you immediately cease using any facilities in the Chapman house that utilitze the septic system; that you pump the system, and that a plan be devised to prevent reoccurance in times of high ground water (i.e., every year at this time). Otherwise, we are authorized to take all steps necessary to protect our clients' rights. cc: Mr. Tom Dunlop, Environ. Health Dept Mr. J. Dart Mr. Don Cramer Very truly yours, J. NICHOLAS McGRATH, P.C. COPY I NICHOLAS McGRO By J. Nicholas McGrath -Member, Colo. (19711, Calif. 119691, and D.C.119661 bars EOC E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS June 4, 1996 Byrnes & Associates, Ltd. P.O. BOX 589 Snowmass Village, 81615 40 Subject: Installation Report Chapman Fishing Lodge Tract 10, Lot 8, Aspen River Valley Ranch Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6726 Dear Mr. Byrnes, jlt;; JUN 1996 I! J� Lill ENVAON'tHi�At..i k..'PEN i PITKIN We observed the installation of the OSDS at the subject site. We observed installation of the field and all components on May 8, 1996. The electrical components were not complete at that time, but have subsequently been installed and observed. Suitable filter material was provided and the cover material was prop- erly placed. The system was installed in general conformance with the design plans and specifications of our letters of November 10, 1995 and the revision of December 10, 1995. If there are any questions, or if we can be of further service, please call. E. 0. CHURCH, INC. Edward 0. Church 2 copies sent ,�°O RE��sr bo C,SG•F9 cr 9.0 • c) 13172 =: •Cc ss�0 N AL 7-1 \ cc: Nelson Environmental cc: Pitkin County Environmental Health, ATTN: Betsy Kipp 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 P.O. Box2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 8U4J/-eu1)y (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 EOC i E.O. CHURCH, INC. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS December 10, 1995 Byrnes & Associates, Ltd. P.O. BOX 589 r t DEC 13 1995 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASPEWPITKIPI Snowmass Village, 81615 Subject: Onsite sewage Disposal System Design, Revision Chapman Fishing Lodge Tract 10, Lot 8, Aspen River Valley Ranch Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6726 Dear Mr. Byrnes, The purpose of this letter is to provide revisions of the Onsite Sewage Disposal System (OSDS) for the subject site. The revision is related to distribution of effluent in the mound field. The revision is to provide pressure distribution for the field. Four laterals of 1.5 inch pipe are proposed with fourteen 0.25 inch holes per lateral, 7 foot on center. The manifold is proposed as 2 inch pipe. The pressure distribution system is based on a 20 foot head which includes: 5 feet of head at the orifices, 5 feet of head from the pump to the laterals and 12 feet of head loss due to friction loss. The proposed system is to be pressurized by a 0.5 HP Gould pump, Model 9885. We understand the system is installed properly at this time except for the pump. When the pump is installed a final letter will be submit- ted. If there are any questions, or if we can be of service if you find another site, please call. E. Edw 2 copies sent cc: Nelson Environmental cc: Pitkin County Environmental Health, ATTN: Betsy Kipp 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218.1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80439 (303) 832.9692 FAX (303) 832.3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 EOC E.O. CHURCH, INC.___ ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS November 10, 1995 Byrnes & Associates, Ltd. ATTN: Jim Byrnes P.O. Box 5889 Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Subject: Onsite Sewage Disposal System Design, Revision Chapman Fishing Lodge Tract 10, Lot B Aspen River Valley Ranch Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6726 Dear Mr. Byrnes, We understand the 5300 square feet (SF) size of the Lodge we were informed of is incorrect. The actual size is 7800 SF. This affect the design of the onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS). Because the size is greater than 6000 SF and loading of 130 gallons per day (GPD) per person is required. Attached are revisions to our design based on the 130 GPD loading. The septic tank capacity is 3000 gallons, which we proposed in two 1500 gallon septic tanks. The tanks should be installed as indicated on Fig. 2. A detail of the lift station is presented on Fig. 4. The field area requires 2900 SF sand filter infiltration area and 2251 SF of basal area. The controlling area is the sand filter area. We recommend an infiltration area of 2900 SF and a basal infiltration area of 3100 SF as indicated on Fig. 3. If there are any questions, or if we call.u ;�• , ;; E. 0. CHURCH, C , y ` a i5 - Com' / •® �-J Edward 0. Church, P.E. ".jL* 3 copies sent can be of further service, please copy Faxed to Betsy at Pitkin County Environmental Health xc: Nelson Environmental and Wastewater 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218.1407 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80439 (303) 832.9692 FAX (303) 832.3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 SCALE \LOT B. TRACT 10 Zw) I" = 50' ASPEN RIVER VALLEY RANCH PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO LIMITS OF \ . °\ MOUND�NTy \ 31' X 100 300 S.F. \ DISPOSAL FIELD\ \ \ \ 2' PRESSURE LINE 1000 GALL\ \ \ LIFT STATION \ \ 1500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK y \ \ 1500 GALLON - ,�Q�oPaSN\ APPROXIMATEIIRRRRIGAATION DITCH ALIGNMENT. DITCH TO BE LINED. LOCATION OF OSDS RG_ t A. PLAN SECTION DRAINAGE QM-\ ALTERNATE EFFLUENT - INLET LINE B. CROSS-SECTION FINISHED GRADE I FILLI`2g.- FLLIEN-OLET LINE 31 ENDS LOOPED OBSERVATION PIPE (RECOMMENDED) STRAW OR BARRIER MATERIAL DISPERSAL GRAVEL NATURAL GRADE I FILL SAND FILTER- WATER MATERIAL C. SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN CRITERIA: FIELD SPECIFICATIONS: NO. OF BEDROOMS - 6 SAND FILTER AREA 29 X 100 = 2900 S.F. LOAD Q - 1560 GPD BASAL AREA SAND FILTER A = Q X 1.75/0.95 = 2874 S.F. LENGTH - 100 FEET PERCOLATION RATE, T = 17 WIDTH - 31 FEET 21� A = Q X VT X 1.75/5 = 2251 S.F. AREA - 3100 S.F. GRAVEL - 1 1/2 INCH TREATMENT UNIT SPECIFICATIONS: TWO 1500 GALLON 1 COMPARTMENT PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS PLUS A 1000 GALLON LIFT STATION PER FIG. 4. DISPOSAL FIELD DETAILS JOB NO. 6726 FIG. 3 IOOO GALLON TWO COMPARTMENT PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK OR SEPARATE 500 GALLON CHAMBER 6" DIAMETER PVC WITH CAP ACCESS LID ELECTRICAL SPLICE BOX 0 POWER LINE FROM DEDICATED CIRCUIT � FPST SEPTICTAW � a 0 SPECIFICATIONS= I. GOLD PUMP 1/3 HP MODEL 35 OR EQIHALENT 2NCH DISCHARGE 34GPM/25 HEAD 2. PUMP ON LEVEL WITH A MINIMUM OF 150 GALLONS AVAILABLE FOR PUMPING. 3. INSTALL PRESSUIRE RELIEF VALVE AT HIGH POINT N PU IP LINE. 4. AUDIBLE ALARM N M -DING. ALARM LEVEL 3 INCHES ABOVE 150 GALLON LEVEL OF TANK. TANK ALERT 101 HW. PUMP CHAMBER DETAL PUMP LINE TO DISTRIBUTION VALVES UNION JOINT FOR QUICK DISCONNECT AHLARMIGH WATER ON/QF-- FLOAT EFFLUENT PUMP MASONRY OR CONCRETE BLOCK Joe NO. 6726 FIG. 4 o — 0 0 0 � a 0 SPECIFICATIONS= I. GOLD PUMP 1/3 HP MODEL 35 OR EQIHALENT 2NCH DISCHARGE 34GPM/25 HEAD 2. PUMP ON LEVEL WITH A MINIMUM OF 150 GALLONS AVAILABLE FOR PUMPING. 3. INSTALL PRESSUIRE RELIEF VALVE AT HIGH POINT N PU IP LINE. 4. AUDIBLE ALARM N M -DING. ALARM LEVEL 3 INCHES ABOVE 150 GALLON LEVEL OF TANK. TANK ALERT 101 HW. PUMP CHAMBER DETAL PUMP LINE TO DISTRIBUTION VALVES UNION JOINT FOR QUICK DISCONNECT AHLARMIGH WATER ON/QF-- FLOAT EFFLUENT PUMP MASONRY OR CONCRETE BLOCK Joe NO. 6726 FIG. 4 11-10-1995 04:41PM FROM E.O. CHURCH—MERRITT HOUSE TO 19709205119 P.01 EOC; i E.O. CNURH, INCi ENGINEER & GEOLOGISTS �I I FAX TRANSMITTAL I i I ;I 1) 0: i I COMPANY: �T.• �u gao AX X10 . • 9�0 • -a a • 4 ii 3 ) TO: rT 'OMPANY • i FAX NO. • �RGM I � DA:,r ✓r II E: fl II I II 'iT j I I I I I I I I 'I kMBER OF PAGES INC',t ul i I it j i I =East 17th Avenue • Demrer, Colorado I i 80218 (303); 832-9691 FAX (303) 832.3517 ( 32.9891 I •FAX,(303) 832-3517 i i • I i i 2 ) TO: COMPANY: i FAX NO i i I I I I —TIME: i �d i I I i (903) 67 FAX (303) 874.0819 TOTAL P.01 11-10-1995 04:41PM FROM E.O. CHURCH—MERRITT HOUSE TO 19709205119 P.01 j E.O. CHURCH, INQ, ENGINEENS & GEOLOGISTS November ;10, 1995 Byrne & associates, Ltd ATTN : � 141 Byrnes P.O. Box 5889 Snoss iVillage, 60 816,15 Subje t: Onsite Sewage pisposal System Design, Revision Chapman Fishing' Lodge Tract 10 Lot H Aspen River Valley Ranch Subdivision ,Pitkin County, ':Colorado j Job No. 6726 i Dear Mr. Byrnes, We un ersiand the 5300 square feet (SF) size of the Lodge we dere informed of is incorrecti. The actual size is 7800 SF. This affect the design of the onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS). Because the size is greater than 6000 SF and loading of 130 gallons per day (GPD) per person is required. Attached are revisions to our deign based on the 130 GOD loading. ' I The septic tank capacity! is 3000. gallons, which we proposed in two 1500 alldn septic tanks; The tanks should be installed as indic ted on Fiv. 2. A det4l of the lift station is presented on Fig. 4.l The field area requires.2500 SF sand filter infiltration area and 2251 SF ofIbasal area. -The controlling area'is the sand filter area I We reco end jan infiltration; area of 2900 SF and a basal infiltration area of 3100 SF as !indicated on Fig. 3. If there are any questions:, or if we can be of further service,* please call. E. O.ICHURCH, INC, i Edward O. Church, P,.E. . 3 cop as sjent copy axed to Betsy at Piikin County Environmental Health xc: elsop Environmentailand Wastewater 1 925 East 17th Avenue !• Denver, Colorado 80218-1407 P.O. Box 2869 • hvergreen. raoc OP 332-M2 FAX (903) M-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 67 -0813 11-10-1995 04:44PM FROM E.O. CHURCH-MERRITT HOUSE TO MO I GALLON TWO COMPARTMENT PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TAW OR SEPARATE 500 ,�ALLQN 0WBER � I 6- UNIETHR PVC WITH OAP ACCESS LID • � I ELECTRICAL: SPLICE BOX POWER UNE IM DEDICATED;CIRCUIT 4 a . a n U 19709205119 P.01 PECK 'CA ONS: L SPU �AVD3 FP MODEL 35 ORI EQUIVAL ElgT 2NCH DISCHARGE � I 2 PL" ON LEVEL WITH A! MIMtI" OF 60 GALLONS AVAILABLE FOR R PNG. S. NS1;AL.L PRESSURE Ra1F VALVE AT 14W PONT N PUN'P LINE. 4. AUDIBLE ALARM N UIDM AUS M Lem- 3 INCHES ABOVE 60 GALLON LEVEL OF TAMC TAME ALERT 101 HW. I 1 PUMP CHAMBER DETAL ,TOB -NO. 6726 PUMP ISE TO ' DISTRIBUTION VALVES T FIG. 4 TOTAL P.01 11-10-1995 04:42PM FROM E.O. CHURCH-MERRITT HOUSE TO 19709205119 P.02 LOT B. TRACT 10 ASPEN RIVER VALLEY RANCH PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO... .. 31" X :100' DISPOSAL �00 I S.r. 2" PRESSUR 1000 LIFT i L! NEkLL `\ ATION;�� 150GAL(, 0 SEPI IC TANK 100 GALLON I iOP05NG`G SEPTIC TANK I i APPROXIMATE IRRIGATION I DITCH ALIGNMENT. DITCH TO 88, LINED. c � J I f LOCATION OF OTS .106 NO. 6726 SCALE I' = 50' 11-10-1995 04:42PM FROM E.O. CHURCH-MERRITT HOUSE TO 19709205119 P.03 A. PLAN SECTION I DRAINAGE BERM j EFFLUENT�i ILET LINE ALTERNATE I 'T EFFLOENT 931- INLET i 31INLETLNE i ENDS LOOPED B. CROSS-SECTION OBSERVATION PPE (RECOMMENDED) rSTRAW OR BARRIER MATERIAL DISPERSAL GRAVEL NATURAL F[NISI QED i GRADE _ GRADE3 , j I.5 I � FILL .ALL l�_Z____29-_._--,: i NR DE SAND FILTER- WATER MATERIAL C. 4PECIFICATIONS DESIGN CRITERIIA: FIELD SPECIFICATIONS: NO. OF BtDROOMS - 6 SANDIFILTER AREA 29 X 100 = 2900 S. LOAD Q - 1560 SPD BASAL AREA SAND FILTER A.= Q X 1.75/0.95 2874 S.F. LENGTH - 100 FEET i ' PERCOLAT!ZON RAS E, T = 17 WIDTH - 31 FEET A = Q X 'VTX.('•,1.75/5 = 2251 S.F. AREA.- 3100 S.F. GRAVEL - 1 1/2 INC, (TREATMENT UNIT SPECIFICATIONS: f TWO 1500 GALLON 1 COMPARTMENT PRECAST -CONCRETE SEPT C TANKS PLUS A 1000 GALLONILIFT STATION PER FIG. 4. I DIiPOSAL FIRLD DETAILS JOB NO. 6726 -FIG' 3 f TOTAL P.03 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. October 6, 1995 Byrnes and Associates Attn: Jim Byrnes P.O. Box 5889 Snowmass Village, Colorado 81615 5020 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax 970 945-8454 Phone 970 945-7988 Job No. 195 401 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot B, Parcel 10, Aspen River Valley Ranch, 1900 Lower River Road, Pitkin County, Colorado. Dear Jim: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated August 21, 1995. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. We previously provided an Interim Report letter to you dated August 31, 1995. Proposed Construction: Plans for the proposed residence were conceptual at the time of this report. We expect the residence will be one to two stories of wood frame construction with a slab -on -grade main floor located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. Cut depths are expected to be shallow, about 3 to 4 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light. When building plans have been further developed, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The site was a vacant hay field at the time of our site work. A small shed was located west of Profile Pit 2. The site slopes gently down to the west towards the Roaring Fork River. An irrigation ditch crosses the site as shown on Fig. 1. Vegetation at the site consists mainly of grass with cottonwood and willow trees and brush west of the irrigation ditch A relatively new, 2 story wood frame house is located to the southeast of the subject site. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating three exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about '/2 foot Byrnes and Associates October 6, 1995 Page 2 of topsoil, consist of medium dense cobbles and boulders in a sandy gravel matrix. Loose clay and sand was encountered overlying the cobbles and boulders in the leach field areas to depths of 2 to 3 feet. Free water was observed in the nits at the time of excavation between 2 '/a and 5 feet. The upper soils were very moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed cobble and boulder soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf for support of the proposed residence. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Dewatering of footing excavations will probably be needed. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill. We recommend that excavations be kept as shallow as possible and the main level floor be slab -on -grade due to the high groundwater observed at the site. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly to moderately loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 -inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. H -P GEOTECH 0 0 Byrnes and Associates October 6, 1995 Page 3 This material should consist of minus 2 -inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. However, due to the high moisture and boulder content of the on-site soils it may be more practical to use imported sand and gravel as structural fill. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 2) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. Percolation Tests: The percolation tests were performed in two areas; northwest of the house and southeast of the house. The test results are shown on Table I and II. The percolation rates northwest of the house averaged about 13 minutes ner-nch. The percolation rates southeast of the house averaged about 40 minutes per inch. We understand an engineering "mounded" system is proposed due to the high groundwater level. Limitations: This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no H -P GEOTECH 0 0 Byrnes and Associates October 6, 1995 Page 4 other warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the soil engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. fi Ep Attachments H -P GEOTECH J k COTTONWOOD TREES PROFILE PIT .I P36 1SP2 o 90 �PI U- 0 PROPOSED RESIDENCE 0 PIT 3 I w I O 8P4 / x U PROFILE p 5� CC j PIT 2 m o � P6/ _o f - G 1195 401 I GEOTEOCHNICAL, InAc. JLOCATION AND ERCOLAT ONO TEST PITSYHOLES I Fig.I ;ALE CLAY AND SAND (CL -SC); loose to medium stiff, very moist, reddish brown. COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GP); about 85% greater than 3" diameter, Qo. cobbles are rounded, in sandy gravel matrix, medium dense, very moist to o° wet, dark brown to brown. Small disturbed sample. Groundwater level at time of excavation. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on August 25, 1995 with a Caterpillar 416 backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. . 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time of excavation. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC =Water Content (%) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 195 401 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK I Logs of Exploratory PitsI Fig. 2 ` GEOTECHNICAL, Inc. 1 Profile Pit Profile Pit 2 Pi, ,, Elev.=91' Elev.=94' Elev.=92' 0 0 •moo -, wC=23.3 qoo -200=65 — �' 8 • off' -0 a:a: 5 5 °• _ °° Q --------------------- LEACH FIELDS HOUSE 10 10 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; clay and sand, organic, soft, reddish brown. CLAY AND SAND (CL -SC); loose to medium stiff, very moist, reddish brown. COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GP); about 85% greater than 3" diameter, Qo. cobbles are rounded, in sandy gravel matrix, medium dense, very moist to o° wet, dark brown to brown. Small disturbed sample. Groundwater level at time of excavation. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on August 25, 1995 with a Caterpillar 416 backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. . 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time of excavation. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC =Water Content (%) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 195 401 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK I Logs of Exploratory PitsI Fig. 2 ` GEOTECHNICAL, Inc. 1 I ' I HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE I JOB NO. 195 401 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS - NORTHWEST OF HOUSE HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-1 26 15 water added water added 63/4 33/4 3 11 3314 1 3/4 2 8 1/2 5 1/2 3 5 1/2 33/4 1 3/4 8 1/4 6 1/2 1 3/4 6 1/2 5 1 1/2 5 33/4 1 1/4 P-2 28 15 water added 81/4 7 1 1/4 17 7 6 1/4 3/4 61/4 5 1/2 3/4 5 1/2 43/4 3/4 93/4 8 1/2 1 1/4 8 1/2 7 1/2 1 7 1/2 63/4 3/4 P-3 30 15 water added 73/4 6 1 3/4 12 6 41/2 1 1/2 8 1/2 7 1/4 1 1/4 7 1/4 6 1 1/4 6 43/4 1 1/4 9 73/4 1 1/4 73/4 61/2 1 1/4 Note: Percolation holes were dug into mostly gravel soils. Holes were soaked on August 28, 1995. Tests were performed on August 29, 1995. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE II JOB NO. 195 401 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS - SOUTHEAST OF HOUSE HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-4 32 15 123/4 121/4 1/2 60 121/4 121/4 - 121/4 12 1/4 12 11 3/4 1/4 11 3/4 11 1/2 1/4 11 1/2 11 1/4 1/4 11 1/4 11 1/4 P-5 30 15 93/4 91/4 1 /2 40 9 1/4 8 1/2 3/4 8 1/2 81/4 1/4 8 1/4 73/4 1/2 73/4 7 1/4 1/2 7 1/4 7 1/4 7 6 1/2 1/2 P-6 30 15 10 9 1 20 9 73/4 1 1/4 73/4 7 3/4 7 6 1/4 3/4 6 1/4 53/4 1/2 53/4 1 5 3/4 5 41/4 3/4 Note: Percolation holes were dug into mostly sand and clay soils. Holes were soaked on August 28, 1995. Tests were performed on August 29, 1995. Form rlo,.-- GWs& APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE ST/'TE ENGINEER COLORADO DNISIC . OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 894 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 181a s- - -- DIV. 5 CNTY. 49 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 10B Block: Filing: Subdiv: ASPEN RIVER VALLEY hAr4uri APPROVED WELL LOCATION PITKIN COUNTY NW 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 25 ROBERT E & PATRICIA HUNTER 100 E MAIN Twp 8 S RANGE 86 W 6th P.M. ASPEN CO 81611 DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES ( 303)925-4141 2100 Ft. from South Section Line 1300 Ft. from West Section Line PPRIVi i b CONS i RUC. T A 'WELL. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 17. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) as a reapplication for expired permit no. 148580, and as the only well on a residential site of 14 acres described as lot 10B, Aspen River Valley Ranch Subdivision, Pitkin County. The issuance of this permit hereby expires permit no. 148580. 4) The use of groundwater from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside a single family dwelling. The ground water shall not be used for irrigation or other purposes. 5) The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The return flow from the use of the well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 7) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. y r'rjT_� _�U APPROVED JD2 4 ,[,) y, •-a,,G,, By a Engineer Receipt No. 0371785 DATE ISSUED SEP 0 2 1994 EXPIRATION DATE SEP 0 2 199 1000 GALLON TWO COMPARTMENT PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK OR SEPARATE 500 GALLON CHAMBER 6" DIAMETER PVC WITH CAP ACCESS LID ELECTRICAL SPLICE BOX POWER LINE FROM DEDICATED CIRCUIT INLET FROM FIRST SEPTIC TANK 0 0 0 L o L o SPECIFICATIONS= L GOULD PUMP 1/3 HP MODEL 35 OR EQUIVALENT 2NCH DISCHARGE 30GPM/25 HEAD 2. PUMP ON LEVEL WITH A MINIMUM OF 150 GALLONS AVAILABLE FOR PUMPING. 3. INSTALL PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE AT HIGH POINT IN PUMP LINE. 4. ALIBLE ALARM IN BUILDING. ALARM LEVEL 3 INCHES ABOVE 150 GALLON LEVEL OF TANK. TANK ALERT 101 HW_ PUMP CHAMBER DETAIL PUMP LINE TO DISTRIBUTION VALVES UNION JOINT FOR QUICK DISCONNECT HIGH WATER ALARM ON/QFF FLOAT EFFLUENT PUMP MASONRY OR CONCRETE BLOCK JW NO. 6726 FIG. 4 EOC E.O. CHURCH, INC. f ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS i September 25, 1995 (� b11 Byrnes & Associates, Ltd. ATTN : Jim Byrnes P.O. Box 5889 Q Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Subject: Onsite Sewage Disposal System Design, Proposed Residence Chapman Fishing Lodge Tract 10, Lot B Aspen River Valley Ranch Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 6726 Dear Mr. Byrnes, As requested, we have prepared an onsite sewage wastewater system (OSTS) design for the subject site. The design is based on a review of plans, and subsurface data by Hepworth Pawlak Geotechnical Inc (HP). The soils data from HP should be included as a part of the Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit. The basis for the requirement for a en- gineer designed system is the lack of 4 feet of suitable soil beneath the field before encountering water. SITE CONDITIONS - The investigated site is a 13.5 acre lot located in a rural Pitkin County, Colorado as indicated on Fig. 1. Most of the property is southwest of the Roaring Fork River. The smaller portion of the site is northeast of the river, although this is where the lodge is proposed. To the northeast of the Roaring Fork River, the ground surface slopes gently to the southwest at the proposed absorp- tion field site, as indicated on Fig. 1. There is an irrigation ditch to the northeast of the proposed field. The proposed field must be maintained 50 feet from the ditch' the ditch must be lined and main- tained a minimum of 10 feet from the field. The ground surface slopes at 3% at the proposed field area. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - At the time of our investigation a 4 bedroom „residence was proposed as indicated on Fig. 1. Two additional bedrooms -V are planned for a detached caretaker unit. The total area of the structures is 5300 square feet (SF), 4300 SF in the main building and oo 1000 SF in the caretaker's unit. The average sewage load for a 6 bed- room dwelling is 1200 gallons per day (GPD), 2100 GPD with a 1.75 Pitkin County facto r' esign flow. The residence will be provided {� water by an onsite well. SUBSURFACE CONDITIO - Subsurface conditions were investigated by HP Geotechnical. Subsoils consisted of 1.5 to 2.5 feet of clay and sand underlain cobbles and gravel in the leach field areas. Ground water was encountered in the test pits at 4 to 5 feet in the leach field areas. The results of the percolation tests indicate rates ranging from 11 to 17 minutes per inch (MPI) to the northwest of the house and 20 to 60 MPI to the southeast of the house. 925 East 17th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80218 P.O. Box 2869 • Evergreen, Colorado 80439 (303) 832-9692 FAX (303) 832-3517 (303) 674-0660 FAX (303) 674-0813 RECOMMENDATIONS - We recommend a OSDS with a lift st �ionand mounded sand filter field be installed at the location i ed on Fig. 2. The OSDS should be designed for a sewage load o 2100 G and a perco- lation rate of 17 MPI. An OSDS design based on age load of 2100 GPD and a percolation rate of 17 MPI is presented on Figs. 2 through 4. The minimum septic tank capacity is 2500 gallons, which we recom- mend in one 1500 gallon single compartment septic tank followed by a 1000 gallon single compartment septic tank. After the septic tanks, a lift station consisting of a 1000 gallon single compartment septic tank with a minimum 1/3 H.P. pump should be installed as indicated on Fig. 4. The pump will distribute effluent throughout the field rather than using only portions of the field. The minimum area requirement for sand filter infiltration is 2200 SF using an application rate of 0.95 gallons per square foot per day. As indicated on Fig. 2, the field has a basal infiltration area of 2400 SF in the natural soil. Surface vegetation should be removed and the surface soils scarified to a depth of 6 inches on the low side of the field. The bottom of the field should be excavated level which will result in an excavation of approximately 2 feet on the uphill side of the field. We recommend excavating the field with a backhoe from above the field or track mounted equipment to minimize compaction of the infiltration area. If excavated with rubber tired equipment, the infiltration surface must be scarified before placing filter sand. Filter sand should then be mounded to a minimum depth of 2 feet. The filter sand must be approved by this office and should consisted of unwashed fine sand meeting the following specifications: 1. maximum of loo passing ##200 sieve, 2. maximum size 1/2 inch, 3. 50o retained between #16 and #100 sieves. The 1 1/2 inch gravel the 4 inch sewer pipe should then be placed. Straw, untreated roofing paper or landscaping filter fabric should be placed on the gravel. The entire field must then be covered with a minimum of 1.5 feet of soil. The fill over the field should extend a minimum of 3 feet laterally from the edge of the gravel before begin- ning the slope to the natural ground surface. Side slopes must be graded to 3:1 (horizontal to vertical) until the natural slope is met. The disturbed surface and top of the mound should be seeded after com- pletion of the installation. We recommend a "dryland, pasture, or foothills" seed mix, which will grow with natural precipitation, and requires no irrigation. No irrigation should be done over the field. The owner must realize an OSTS is different from public sewer service. The owner must be aware of and assume the responsibility for mainte- nance. We recommend the pumping of the first septic tank at the end of the first year of use to monitor sludge accumulation. The tank should be pumped at least every two years. There are daily considera- tions, such as not putting plastic or other nonbiodegradable material into the OSTS. Water use must be carefully monitored, so toilets are not allowed to run when seals malfunction. To illustrate the point, it should be noted a running toilet will consume in excess of 1000 GPD if allowed to run. As the system is designed for 2100 GPD, an excess 1000 GPD will flood and harm the system. We caution you against installation of a water softener. The hydrau- lic loading from the backwash of a water softener can detrimental to OSTS and a separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash, if a water softener is installed. Also no harsh chemicals such as for cleaning or photographic processing should be introduced into the 3 0 Is OSTS. No landscaping or plastic.should be used over the field. No surface irrigation is allowable above the field. LIMITATIONS - Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted. If subsurface conditions different from those described in this report are encountered, we should be notified to evaluate the affect of the changes on the proposed OSTS. If chang- es are dictated by gov_ health departments, we should be contact- ed to evaluate the E. 0. CHURCH, IN 4 ° �"g 0. C�fG.n 1317 Edward 0. Church �.E . SSS/O N M- 3 copies sent xc: Nelson Environmental and Wastewater t+ Awk Mrd ted' LOT B. TRACT IQ ASPEN RIVER VALLEY RANCH PITM COUNTY. COLORADO 0ADDITICNAL LDING ENVELOPE ORIGINAL � BUILDING ENVELOPE PROPOSED / RESIDENCE i i i ■ - ...... SITE PLAN SCALE F = 200 JOB NO. 6726 RG. I i i LIMITS OF - MOUND FILL \LOT B. TRACT IO SCALE ASPEN RIVER VALLEY RANCH I" = 50' PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO APPROXIMATE IRRIGATION \ DITCH ALIGNMENT. \ DITCH TO BE LINED. \ \ cQUiv" \ 1 \ 1 110,10 A. PLAN SECTION DRAINAGE BERM-,� �y ALTERNATE EFFLUENT - INLET LINE Er = LLENT INLET LINE 1' 24' 1 ENCS CAPPED B. CROSS-SECTION I, ,—C cr RVATICI B��N P!P� (RE��•OMMENC°ED) �STFAW CR EAFFIER MATEFIAL ' �DISFEFSAL `FA.VEL �--�•_,, r NA � LRAL-;� FINISHED I ~ 1 y GFA,CCE GRADE i• F;L_ r- L_ ,Y; TER C. SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN CRITERIA: NO. OF BEDROOMS - 6 LOAD Q - 1200 GPD .AND FILTER. MATERIAL FIELD SPECIFICATIONS: SAND FILTER A = Q X 1.75/0.95 = 2210 S.F. PERCOLATION RATE, T = 17 A = Q X X 1.75/5 = 1731 S.F. TREATMENT UNIT SPECIFICATIONS: SAND FILTER AREA 22 X 100 = 2200 S.F. BASAL AREA LENGTH - 100 FEET WIDTH - 24 FEET AREA - 2400 S.F. GRAVEL - 1 1/2 INCH ONE 1500 GALLON AND ONE 1000 GALLON 2 COMPARTMENT PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK. DISPOSAL FIELD DETAILS JOB NO. 6726 FZG. 3 From : SNOWMASS WATER&SANITATION DIST PHONE No. : 923 6271 Nov.10 1995 11:35AM P01 SHOMMS FIAT= a =- CM DI B = P.O. BOX 5700 $NownBS VILTAM CO 82.616 (303) 923-2056 FAX if ( 303) 923--6271 FAX Dente. Send to FAX company: . Cal From. Re: No. of Pages ( including this page) If you do not receive all pages, please contact: at our office. Comments: From SNOWMASS WATER&SANITATION DIST PHONE No. 923 6271 Nov.10 1995 11:35AM P02 �'.,. ••°�: .1:. ,I r' r;r1 r�...: :1 n.: \'.. 1.,i : S •1(j -'!L' t ,'tl•$. r!.,4. y'+:; .: 1-�: , �. I'• .:Y. ��, �;;Y.� � 1. ii •' � , �':1';.• ,��•,' f S• � •a. y � '.1\.,:, r. Hr jar:. il,.i 1.I �' ,'s:,: ,'., ,_ � � •. A. ;�i •��', I,i''' v,/i. i, i;.:'t;'. •!. .1 i. ,.0\., r. •.r Y,.,• ,. a.. i ;. i.' �. . i .>"' i'; l . •;1• ,:T:, • ♦• /' l.r i•', STANDARD BACTERIOLOGICAL WATER TEST ONOWMASS WATER 8 SANITATION DISTRICT P.O. 80% 6700 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO_ 81516 lqoo /_ .,e-,Av& Ism IBM SAmpla Lboati0n.?A NAME OK SAMPLE TAKLN: VAIL T TIME '�' 0 SUPPLY fill �iIT T A�+•1•()aAQ U CHLORINE COUNTY SAMPLER RESIDUAL -MG/L ( ) COMMUNITY SUPPLY ( ) ROUTINE DISTRIDUTION SYSILM SUPPLY I ) NON COMMUNITY ( ) 011ECK SAMPLE ( ) ;KOCESS WATER ( ) UIIIER PUBLIC ( ) RAW I GIWUND ( ) SURFACE (X) PRIVATE ( ) SPEC AL PURPOSE SAMPLE NOTE: If ALL INI-OHMA71ON IS NOT SUPPLIED, THE SAMPLE WILL BE DISCARDED. REMARKS; CVP RETURN Tp4j& Av, S %L'{ Z AMP J~ ADDRESS z4 7 G 0 CITY -STAT AIQL(lX-1/1 S1 K"AGC .4) w-cli< SEE REVERSe FOR TIME LIMITATIONS, SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS. LAO -MICRO 106 (Rev. 3x19) 100M Analyst RESULTS UNSUITABLF FOR TEST MEMORAN[ FILTER V _ DIRECT LTC_VERIFIEDC6MS FECAL ABSENT PRESENT 4 y �' An.IIIATEQ %N� COUNT: COI (FORM/100 ML J N F: IAURYL SULFATE BROTH e (►a W W C F F a 24 A ,e BGB l ! MPN COLIFORM/100ML RESULTS GREATER THAN ONE COLIFORM PER 100 ML INDICATES w W NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM a q DRINKING WATER STANDARDS, o G l3�/rnLS Nt?.I tit �LOOF2, PL—?.N HOUSS', MAIN L -r --L. '.345SQ. U}'1•i"R LLNCL, I�100 SQ. PT. LNGLOSCD GORRIOOR. 94� SQ. PT. EaARA6C: 95� Se. *T• ✓VORiG ARBA, 5Ha SG7. rT. Li�/IN6 gUART=RS. bbd SQ. IF. r- NOTES : t 1. 12"0 Av/ERAGE LOGS U.N.O. s 2. "LOG TO LOG" FASTENERS BY P.L.H., ALL OTHERS BY G.G.-U.N.O.a±'.1' 14- _ S G. tK 3� w/SIb� Lilt I"i 14• s.G. LCY K 2'� t5 o•H•�*� �' ii ci- IAS 4A —