Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.eh.264514401001 (2011)I 11'KI COIT LTN OTI ONSITE WASTEWATER TREA..AENT SYSTEM (OWTS) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10 - Aspen, CO - 81611 Phone: 970.920.5070 Fax: 970.920.5077 Permit #: 0005.2011.POWT Parcel ID #: 2645-144-01-001 Permit Issued: ®NEW ❑REPAIR ❑REMODEL/ADDITION ❑TANK ONLY ❑FIELD ONLY ❑AMENDMENT Owner(s): Michael Silverman Property Address Legal Description Size of Lot: Size of Building: 5720 Snowmass Creek Road Lot 1, Hidden Meadows Acres 5746 Sq. Ft. Detached Accessory Unit: Size of Accessory Unit: The system is designed for: 4 bedrooms Designed By Phone #: Fax # High Country Engineering Project #: 970-945-8676 Mailing Address: 970-945-2555 Email Address: Perc Rate: 21 mpi Minimum Tank Capacity: Profile Hole Depth 1125 qallons ❑YES ®NO 2091004.00 Dated: 1517 Blake Avenue, Glenwood S Sq. Ft. 4121/11 nqs, CO 81601 8 ft Depth to Groundwater or Bedrock: 7.5 ft** Minimum Absorption Area: 808 sq ft w/ 30% reduction Permit Conditions: This OWTS Construction Permit is approved on the condition of compliance with the engineer design as submitted with the application and the specifications cited above. Changes must be approved by this Department and the engineer prior to construction. This design calls for one 1500 gallon, two compartment tank with a pump in the second compartment. The field will consist of 6 rows of 16 Quick 4 gravelless chambers in a bed configuration for a total of 947 square feet. The field area must be excavated with a level base, NO MORE THAN 3.5ft below grade to maintain a 4' separation between the bottom of the field and high, seasonal groundwater. The minimum setback from the absorption area to the well must be at least 100' and at least 10' to the property line. The tank must beat least 50' from the well. The field area should be clearly staked prior to excavation to avoid errors. The excavation must be inspected by the engineer and this department PRIOR to placement of the chambers or piping. Components of previously installed OWTS components may be properly abandoned in place. This Permit must be kept on-site during installation. The engineer must do a final inspection of the installation and submit an "as -built" letter to this Department within 30 days of the final inspection, unless a longer period of time has been agreed upon, in writing. This Department must also be called for the final inspection with a minimurn of 48 hours notice. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the requirements of the Pitkin County OWTS Regulation. This Permit is conditioned upon the property owner(s) providing for regular inspection, cleaning, and maintenance of the system by qualified personnel, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and the requirements of the Pitkin County OWTS Regulation. Issuance of this OWTS Construction Permit does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or representation by the Department that the system will operate properly or will not fail. THIS PERMIT IS EXPRESSLY CONDITIONED UPON COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY OWTS REGULATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THOSE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED ABOVE. Plans and specifications for the proposed OWTS have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby given to the property owner(s) to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County OWTS Regulation. This Permit will expire 1 year from the date of issuance unless construction on the system has commenced. An "as -built" drawing must be submitted and app/rovedD by EH before final approval of the system will be issued. Issued By: 6r LCA Omoi . Date: Z Z h.L Expires: Installer: — Final Approv(�issued By License #: L Date: j Reactivation Authorized by: New Expiration Date: F]FeeFaM JNSITE WASTEWATER TREATML_ _T SYSTEM (OWTS) O CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION _� Ex/xx J���� 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10 - Aspen, CO • 81611 Phone: 970.920.5070 Fax: 970.920.5077 Parcel ID# (available from the Pitkin County Assessor's Office 970-920-5160 or atwww.pitkinassessor.orq): 264'55 - 144 01 001 Purpose of Permit: ❑ NEW ❑ REPAIR DUE TO FAILURE N REMODEL/ADDITION ❑ TANK ONLY ❑ FIELD ONLY Cost of System Repair or Remodel/Addition (approximate): $20,000 Property Address: 5720 Snowmass Creek Raod Lot: Bleck: Filing: Subdivision: 1 Hidden Meadows Property Owner(s)': Email Address: Michael Silverman SilDuck@aol.com Owner's Mailing Address: City, State, Zip: 40 West 77 st apt 9b New York, NY 10024 Home Phone: Business Phone: 212-787-6711 'Contact information must be provided for the owner signing this application. Primary Contact Person/Applicant (if not owner): Company: Kevin Heinecken David Lambert Construction Contact/Applicant Mailing Address: City, State, Zip: PO Box 1727 Basalt, CO 81654 Cell Phone: Business Phone: 970-379-4238 Fax Number: Email Address: 866-972-2230 kevin@davidlambertaspen.com Building Permit # (if applicable): Lot Size (in acres): 5.16 Acres Size of Building (square feet): Number of Potential Bedrooms: 5746 4 Detached Accessory Unit? F1 YES F] NO Size of Accessory Unit (square feet): Number of Potential Bedrooms In or Fixture List for the Accessory Unit: Water Source: �NJ PRIVATE WELL ❑ SURFACE WATER ❑ SPRING ❑ COMMUNITY/PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM Name of Community/Public Water System (if applicable): Engineering Firm: Job Number: Phone Number: Fax Number: High Country Engineering 2091004.00 945-8676 945-2555 Mailing Address: City, State, Zip: 1517 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 PLEASE READ BEFORE SIGNING: 1 certify that the above information is complete and accurate and that I have provided complete and accurate information in all of the documents included in my application package. I acknowledge that EH/NR may revoke any permit I am issued if my application is found to contain any inaccurate, false, or misleading information. I understand that no construction may be undertaken on an OWTS until an OWTS Construction Permit is issued. Owner Sign ture (Required): Date: Applicant S gnature: Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Received by EN/HR Staff Fee & Receipt #: Date: �D(OZ3©���5 3 2 iC G:\OWTS March 8, 2008 NEW REGS Office -Admin\forms\OWTS Const farms\OWTS construction permit application.xis Updated 10/7/08 0(j0,9 - 2_G((_ powt H CIVIL. ENGINEERING July 19, 2012 s An Employee -Owned Company Bryan Daugherty, REHS Environmental Health Specialist Pitkin County Environmental Health Bryan Daugherty [Bryan.Daugherty@co.pitkin.co.us] (970) 920-5076 Re: Silverman OWTS - HCE Job No. 2091004.00 To Whom it may concern: The following letter is to confirm the Engineer's acceptance of the constructed waqstewater treatment system for the Silverman residence located up Snowmass Creek Road in Pitkin County, Colorado. The design included a 1,500 gallon septic tank, and 96 Quick 4 infiltrator units. These units were installed at the location and configuration shown on the drawings. The system has been completed with the intent of the original design and has been tested on June 27, 2012 and functioned as intended and the alarm was functioning. Please contact me at High Country Engineering, Inc. if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. Roger Neal Principal Engineer 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 14 Inverness Drive East Suite F-120 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Englewood, CO 80112 Telephone (970) 945-8676 - Fax (970) 945-2555 Telephone (303) 925-0544 - Fax (303) 925-0547 STANDARD ABSORPTION AREA: TOTAL DESIGN FLOW - DOD GPD 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL B�CCORDANCE WITH THE PITKIN COUNTY REGULATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, EVEN THOUGH V� ALL SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH SPECIFIC DETAILS AS lig REFERRED TO IN 11E ABOVE MENTIONED REGULATIONS. 2. FLOW FOR FIELD: Zu N Z 00 g RESIDENCE S.F 5382 t S.F. (< 8000 S.F.1 FF W O 4 BEDROOM • 2 PERSONS/BEDROOM 75 GALLONS/PERSON/DAY IS 7i O 800 GPD - AVERAGE DAILY F1AW. jU A DESIGN FLOW - 1.5 • AVERAGE - BOD CPD (0) y1 SEPTIC TANK: Q MINIMUM TOTAL TANK SIZE- IZE0 m O 0: 0• 1 DA 24 HRS - 30 HRS - 1125 GPD INSTALL 011E 1250 -GALLON TANK WITH BAFFLE STANDARD ABSORPTION AREA: TOTAL DESIGN FLOW - DOD GPD A --q,-,rt • P 0-M MUM FLOW P -LOADING FACTOR - 1.4 t -PERCOLATION RATE - 21 = 900 21 • 1.4 - 1155 SF Z O WITH 2 REDUCTION FOR DOSING - 924 L� TOTAL SF NEEDED - 924 SF W USE INFILTRATOR SYSTEM QUICK 4 STANDARD CHAMBER OR EQUAL IN TRENCH CONFIGURATION: 0' 924 SF O 9.87 SF UNIT - 94 UNITS USE MIN. 96 INFILTRATOR SYSTEMS INC'S INFILTRATOR WICK 4 STANDARD CHAMBER IN BED SYSTEM EFFECTIVE AREA PER UNIT -9.87 S.F. m O AM AFEA OF MleME 01M RMO N PROPOSEp FlELO' (PROPOSED HQUSEI Q TOTAL AVERAGE DAILY ROW - 800 CPD AREA OF INFLUENCE DESIGN FLOW 600 GPD • 1.50 - 800 GPD FOR FIRST 1,0L10AALLGPD: 100 FELT F 6RB OFALDOW OVER 1000 CAEAO�NS 100 GALLONS PER p (900 - 1000) / 100 - -1 1 ' B - -8 FEET N/A OR 0' 0 FEET + 100 FEET - 100 FEET (WE]i�^ACK). O 3. CLEAN OUTS ARE REOUIRED AT ALL BENDS AND A MINIMUM OF ICO FEET ALONG THE HOUSE SEWER. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL Ln WATERTIGHT COMPONENTS, PRIOR TO THE ABSORPTION AREA, TO PREVENT INFILTRATION. w y 5. TOPSOIL COVER MAY BE VARIED (WITH 1 FOOT MINIMUM) TO ALLOW FOR NON -INTRUSIVE LANDSCAPING. 6. INSTALL RISERS AS NECESSARY TO BRING ALL ACCESS POINTS TO LWTHIN ONE-HALF FOOT OF FINAL GRADE utT1 0 7. LOCATIONS OF ALL COMPONENTS MAY BE VARIED AS NECESSARY AS LONG O 10p AS ALL MINIMUM DISTANCES AND SLOPES MEET THOSE REQUIRED. Z m m S. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM ABSORPTION n- U V FIELD AREA USING DRAINAGE SWALES AS NECESSARY. �E� O B. SOILS INFORMATION PROVIDED BY HP GE07ECH, JOB NUMBER 108-8111A.g A, DATED MAY 8, 2009, y O N U' N 10. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ISDS PERMIT. PERMIT MUST BE 3 " Qit' OBTAINED FROM APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY OFFICIALS. Q! J 10, N On ENGINEER MUST OBSERVE CONSTRUCTED SYSTEM BEFORE BACKFILL (0^ p^ AND PROVIDE REPORT TO COUNTY. W Z p O 10. 11. THIS SYSTEM IS SIZED FOR TYPICAL DOMESTIC WASTES ONLY. BACKWASH W G OR FLUSHING FLAWS FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS UNITS OR WATER SOFTENERS Z N W OR FILTERS SHOULD NOT BE INTRODUCED INTO THIS SYSTEM. 12. INSTALL BLUEBOARD INSULATION OVER SEWER PIPE WHEREVER DEPTH IS , n F N LJ'J LESS THAN 5.0 FEET. V 13. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONTACTED FOR SITE INSPECTION PRIOR TO Z F; 2 02 BACKFlWNG OF SYSTEM COMPONENTS. W NN W p 14. THE SUBSOILS EXPOSED IN THE PROFILE PIT CONSISTED OF 1 -FOOT OF TOPSOIL UNDERLAIN BY SILTY, CLAYEY, SANDY GRAVEL WITH COBBLES AND BOULDERS TO A MAXIMUM EXPLORED DEPTH OF W. POSSIBLE GROUNDWATER WAS ENCOUNTERED. NO �y BEDROCK WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED. X z W 15. SITE PLAN INFORMATION, AND TOPOGRAPHY, NUMBER OF BEDROOMS SIZE OF HOUSE PROVIDED N 0Q O BY CCY ARCHITECTS 16. LEACH FIELD MUST BE SURVEAFTER INSTALLATION FOR ACCURATE LOCATION Z 6 g IL YED FOR FINAL FIELD INSPECTION AND WRITEOFF. K 17. DESIGN OF THE SYSTEM BASED ON A PERCOLATIONO RATE OF 21 mpI AND NO WATER OR BED �T{ j m ROCK IN THE PERCOLCATION HOLES VZ r 18. SEPTIC TANKS TANKS ARE TO BE ANCHORED IF GROUNDWATER IS ENCOUNTERED. rir p b TV i 1. ABSORPTION LATERALS SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 FEET IN LENGTH. 2. THE BOTTOM OF EACH ABSORPTION BED SHALL BE LEVET_ 3. DRAINAGE SWALES ARE TO BE PROVIDED ABOVE AND AROUND BED, AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT SURFACE RUNOFF FROM ENTERING ABSORPTION AREA 4. BED LATERALS SHALL FOLLOW CONTOURS. 5. INSTALL INFILTRATOR IN ACCORDANCE WTH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 6. BED BOTTOM AND SIDEWALIS MUST BE RAKED TO REMOVE SOIL SMEARS INCURRED DURING EXCAVATION. 7. NO EXCAVATION OF ABSORPTION FIELD IS TO BE DONE WRING WET WEATHER w AND USE OF RUBBER TIRE VEHICLES OVER ABSORPTION AREA IS PROHIBITED 0 W 8. UNSUITABLE MATERIAL COSTING WITHIN THE BED SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND < Z I.9 i BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF ONSITE SELECT OR PIT -RUN MATERIAL (n O Q w oJ yN HW UU WN rp NOTE Z U IIF..}}}...... AN EXISTING ISDS WAS COMPLETED FOR THE SITE H 2CO2 THE DESIGN WAS Q COMPLETED BY CHURCH ANDA NITS FOR INC. THE DESIGN CANED FOR A 1,500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK AND 21 UNITS FOR AN ABSORPTION RTRENCH.ITS THIS SYSTEM % Q d E TO BE NITS TH ED IN PLACE WHERE NEW INFILTRATOR UNITS NEW UNI T WITH U U EXISTING UNITS THE UNITS ARE TO BE REMOVED TO 8' FROM THE NEW UNITS. U Z Q (() ALL OF THE EXCAVATED UNITS ARE TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF OFFSITE F y Q THE EXISTING DOSING PUMP, SEPTIC TANK AND PANEL ARE TO BE SAVED AND i RE -UTILIZED. PUMP AND PANEL SHALL BE TESTED AND ANY WORN OR BROKEN .J PARTS ARE TO BE REPLACED. PICTURES HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO THE ORENCO LL N DEALER AND DEALER INDICATED THAT THERE IS NO REASON THAT THE SYSTEM SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR REUSE QPFROOLARON BORING PROJECT NO. GRAPHIC SCALE 2091004.00 Mo (LRnw) I inch = 20 ft. ISDS 1 Q Pitkin County Environmental Health Department Contact Log Sheet Carla Ostberg From: Carla Ostberg Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 3:02 PM To: 'Roger Neal' Cc: kevin@davidlambertaspen.com Subject: RE: ISDS Hi Roger, Got your message and am good with everything. I do need you to change the size of the tank on your design to a 1500 gallons and change the depth of burial from 36" to 30". I'll just ask that you provide pump specs prior to finalizing the permit. Once I have those changes, I have the permit drafted and ready to go. I did ask that we be called to inspect the excavation prep prior to placement of the infiltrators. Thanks! Carla Ostberg, MPH, RENS Environmental Health Manager Pitkin County Environmental Health 970-920-5438 From: Roger Neal mailto:rneal(dhceng.coml Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 1:48 PM To: Carla Ostberg Cc: kevinCQbdavidlambertaspen.com; tkennedy a ccyarchitects.com Subject: ISDS Carla, Here is the system re -designed for a bed in the same location. I went with 96 units with 94 required. Fits pretty good and will have roughly 1' of cover on the low end and 3' of cover on the high end. That will put the infiltrative surface at approximately 85+. Let me know if you need anything else. Roger D. Neal, P.E. Principal High Country Engineering, Inc. 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 100 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8676 Fax: 970-945-2555 L:] NOTICE: Use of this electronic media by anyone other than High Country Engineering, Inc. shall be at the sole risk of such user and without liability or legal exposure to High Country Engineering, Inc. By saving these file(s), the user accepts responsibility for this electronic media. Carla Ostberg From: Carla Ostberg Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 12:01 PM To: 'Roger Neal' Cc: kevin@davidlambertaspen.com; tkennedy@ccyarchitects.com k1111 Subject: RE: ISDS �,Jo 0 Roger, e 1 have a couple questions about this design. !7 1) Are you planning to relocate the 1250 gallon tank? First, the min required capacity is 1125. If you plan on placing a pump in the 2nd compartment, that will displace some amount of liquid and minimize available capacity. Would it be feasible to simply specify a new, larger tank (a 1500 gallon tank) and not try to relocate 5;—It 0 - the old one? �Sly`Ab"\.a w► 2) The bed cross section calls for a maximum 36" of cover. With groundwater at 75, max cover cannot be more than 30" or the bottom of the field should not be more than 3.5' below grade. If keeping the bed level will exceed this max depth, the bed could be broken up into 2 sections to keep them shallow. 3) You have specified 94 Quick 4 chambers for a total of 924 sq ft, taking a reduction of 20% for dosing. Our /. regulation allows not only the 20% for dosing, but an additional 10% for gravelless chambers in a bed w°f configuration. This puts the required square footage at 808 sq ft and a total of 30% reduction (82 Quick 4 units). Since you have relatively tight setbacks from both the well and the property line, as well as a minimal Vv- P burial depth because of high groundwater, I would say this additional reduction would give you a little more ver` �`�` wiggle room for the installation. Of course you are allowed to have more area than required, I just wanted to let {laV 1 ice"` you know you have the option of taking a larger reduction. 4) 1 see you have provided a picture of the existing pump. Could you also send over the pump specifications for our records? rwj- rwv\j-- F &-%L` bo ,ti,wC Give me a call if you want to talk about any of these points. I'd like these addressed before I issue the permit. Thanks, Carla Ostberg, MPH, REHS Environmental Health Manager Pitkin County Environmental Health 970-920-5438 From: Roger Neal mailto•rneal@hcengcoml Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 1:48 PM To: Carla Ostberg Cc: kevin(d)davidlam bertaspen.com; tkennedy ccyarchitects.com Subject: ISDS Carla, Here is the system re -designed for a bed in the same location. I went with 96 units with 94 required. Fits pretty good and will have roughly 1' of cover on the low end and 3' of cover on the high end. That will put the infiltrative surface at approximately 85+. Let me know if you need anything else. 7 Roger D. Neal, P.E. Principal High Country Engineering, Inc. 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 100 Glenwood Springs, CO 81.601 Phone: 970-945-8676 Fax: 970-945-2555 NOTICE: Use of this electronic media by anyone other than High Country Engineering, Inc. shall be at the sole risk of such user and without liability or legal exposure to High Country Engineering, Inc. By saving these file(s), the user accepts responsibility for this electronic media. 4 P-1 ,-y. 4eIlr.O` OWTS DESIGN CALCULATIONS - for Pitkin Owner's Name s Parcel ID # House Size (sq. ft.) may. , (75 gpd or 100 gpd) Number of Bedrooms in Main House Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow 600 State Review Require no Perc Rate (T) Design Flow (Q) = # poten al bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.5 Q= 900 Minimum tank capacity 1125 gallons Absorption Area (=Q/5 X SQRT perc rate) (1.41oadi factor) A= 1,155 sq. ft. of absorption area require Absorption Area (=Q/5 X SQRT perc rate) WITH SECONDARY TREATMENT (no loading factor) A= 825 sq. ft. of absorption area required Abs. Area w/ loading factor (B25) Trencb Bed Quick4 Trench Quick4 Bed Pipe and Gravel (-10%) 1039 no red. 1155 105 117 94 Dosing Chambers (-20%) (-30%) 9^24 (20%) (-10%) 924 103 94 82 105 Max Allowable 5( 0%1 X77 (-30%) 59 Secondary Treatment Abs Area w/ out loading factor (B28) Trench Bed Pipe and Gravel (-10%) 742 no red. 825 75 84 67 Dosing (-20%) 660 (-20%) 660 67 59 75 Chambers (-30%) 577 (-10%) 742 42 59 Max Allowable (-50%) 412 (-30%) 577 100 SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 50 SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet = 25 SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = wt� r o ,a 5 4 1 3 gog =y cwkb.P As *Cr 6a Si n Q1t.0 Gff--�- ` - H e� �' G< 0 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL December 9, 2008 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81&1 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@Iipgeoteeh.com Mr. & Mrs. Michael Silverman 40 West 77`h Street, Apt. 9B New York, NY 10024 Job No. 108 618A Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed Residence, Lot 1, Hidden Meadows, 5720 Snowmass Creek Road, Pitkin County, Colorado Dear Mr. & Mrs. Silverman: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated October 29, 2008. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Evaluation of potential geologic hazard impacts on the site are outside the scope of this study. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two-story single family residence over walkout basement and crawlspace levels. The proposed construction is to be wood frame with some steel framing. The proposed foundation is to be spread footings with ground floors in the garage and basement areas proposed to be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to range up to 15 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The septic disposal system is proposed to be located at the southwest corner of the property, as shown on Figure I where the Profile boring and test holes are located. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The lot is occupied by a two-story, wood frame residence with attached, slab - on -grade garage and slab -on -grade basement. The existing residence is accessible by a gravel road entering from the southeast portion of the lot. One driveway branches off to access the garages and the other proceeds north and loops back to the residence. In the proposed septic area there was grass and weeds, and scattered boulder outcroppings. The west portion of the Parker 303.841-7119 e Colorado Springs 719.633.5562 9 S.ilverthorne 970-468-1989 APPROXIMATE SCALE T'= 50' / \7070 / 50' WILDCAT -- EQUESTRIAN EASEMENT & UTILITY EASEMENT -P6 / Q P1 P2 / / PROFILE P / BORING 1 A �A n 0 I.P5 0 0 7080/ r + P 3 / I S UTILITY , 7)60 APPROXIMATE . , CENTERLINE HOLY CROSS EASEMENT C� � • .v• •tir. vvr rri v r v1 r r! IIV V 1 VV 1. / EASEMENT p PROFILE BORING FOR PREVIOUS STUDY. LOT 2 , (TYPICAL) PERCOLATION TEST HOLE FOR THIS STUDY. 7090 D PERCOLATION TEST HOLE FOR PREVIOUS STUDY. �"1 LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 108 618A s� AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES Figure 1 HBt+wottri+Pwwux GwotsctttaicnL HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 108 618A HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P4 12 15 Water Added 6 51/4 3/4 23 51/4 41/2 3/4 53/4 51/4 1/2 51/4 41/2 3/4 41/2 33/4 3/4 33/4 31/4 1/2 P5 16 15 Water Added Water Added 7 41/2 21/2 15 41/2 2 21/2 61/4 43/4 11/2 51/2 41/2 1 41/2 31/2 1 31/2 21/2 1 P6 15 15 Water Added Water Added 6 31/4 23/4 14 31/4 1 21/4 6 41/2 11/2 41/2 31/2 1 43/4 31/2 11/4 31/2 21/2 1 P7 36 15 12 111/2 1/2 30 111/2 11 1/2 11 101/2 1/2 101/2 10 1/2 10 91/2 1/2 91/2 9 1/2 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug and soaked on April 29, 2009. Percolation tests were conducted on April 30, 2009. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test. 0 0 -2- proposed septic area sits at the toe of a bank covered by boulders and oak brush. South of the residence, up hill from the proposed septic area, landscaping and a koi pond were present. Thick oak brush was encountered southeast of the house and north of the driveway. More thick oak brush was encountered south of the gravel driveway accessing the garages, between the driveway and the property line. Areas to the north of the existing residence were heavily wooded. A dirt path north of the existing residence extended off the gravel driveway down to a grassy field and the proposed septic area. A grove of Aspens was found to the west of the proposed septic site. Pine trees and cottonwoods were found between Snowmass Creek and the grass field. Snowmass Creek borders the property to the west, and is located approximately 125 feet west of the existing residence. Large boulders were visible on the ground surface. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by drilling holes with 4 inch continuous flight auger, powered by a truck mounted CME -45B drill rig. The locations of the borings are shown on Figure 1. The logs of the borings are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 2 to 3 feet of topsoil and fill, consisted of slightly silty, sandy gravel with cobbles and probable boulders. Results of a gradation analyses performed on a samples of slightly silty, sand and gravels (minus 5 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Figures 4 and 5. The laboratory test results are summarized in Table 1. Free water was encountered in Boring 2, 12 feet deep, and the upper soils were slightly moist to wet at the water elevation. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf for support of the proposed residence. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils and existing fill encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill. Job No. 108 618A GeFtech -3 - Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated fi•om all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on- site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Free water was encountered during our exploration. It has been our experience in this area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 %z feet deep. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: I ) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas Job No. 108 618A G4 c9tech • Q V0 and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A swale may be needed uphill to direct surface runoff around the residence. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on November 18, 2008 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile boring and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Figure 1. The test holes (nominal 4 inch diameter by approximately 60 inch deep) were dug by using 4 inch auger and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Figure 2, and consist of slightly silty, sandy gravels and silty, sandy clay. Testing for Test Hole 1 was run in silty gravel, and testing for Test Holes 2 and 3 were run in clayey silt. The percolation test results are presented in Table 2. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area may not be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. According to gradation and hydrometer analyses represented in Figure 6, the USDA soil type is Sandy Loam. We recommend a civil engineer design the infiltration septic disposal system. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the borings at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. Job No. 108 618A HP Gt c tech -5 - This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Jason R. Spotts, E.I. Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. JRS/vam attachments Figure 1 — Location of Exploratory Borings and Percolation Test I loles Figure 2 — Logs of Exploratory Borings and Profile Test Hole Figure 3 — Legend and Notes Figures 4-5 — Gradation Test Results Figure 6 — USDA Gradation Test Results Table 1 — Summary of Laboratory Test Results Table 2 — Percolation Test Results cc: CCY Architects — Attn: Todd Kennedy Job No. 108 618A GiOtech APPROXIMATE SCALE 1"=50' PROPERTY APPROXIMATE 7080 — LINE CENTERLINE HOLY (TYPICAL) 7700 CROSS EASEMENT / L / / `a, LOT 1 / / / \ / / 30' ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT / BORING 2 / z B .ING 1 7090 / EXIST/NG EXISTING G R ES/pENCE WELL i 7070 50' WILDCAT / EQUESTRIAN / 1y�o EASEMENT & /� / BO NG 3 � UTILITY EASEMENT / / � J � P2 �96FILE / BORING � l \ � 7080 / P3 UTILITY Q EASEMENT LOT 2 (TYPICAL) \ Q 7090 7100 a_ m��CI- LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 g 108 618A AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES H worth—Pawlak Geotechnical 0 BORING 1 BORING 2 BORING 3 ELEV.= 7086' ELEV.= 7085' ELEV.= 7009' 20 PROFILE BORING ELEV.= 7081' 0 11/12 o 9 rave a. 5 38/12 WC=10.0 ap. ep• +4=32 ..:. 35/11 34/12 67/12 1 30/12 0' WC=5.9 Grnuv��w4-}e�r- J '' WC=4.4 �i +4=28?�' t 0 •• +4=55 CL -200=41 � TT -200=22 5 .$ 0 98/11 0• 20/12 Q. gip. �•' WC=9.6 +4=26 o• -200=42 • q` a��i ; 10 33/12 t 0• O C 0� .4' 15 93/12 20 PROFILE BORING ELEV.= 7081' Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. iF 20 108 618A I W tiecn I LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS I Figure 2 Hepworth—Pawlak Geotechnical 0 11/12 o 9 rave 5 38/12 WC=10.0 ep• +4=32 •�•• -200=37 1 30/12 Grnuv��w4-}e�r- J 0 � 10- �i t CL Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. iF 20 108 618A I W tiecn I LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS I Figure 2 Hepworth—Pawlak Geotechnical LEGEND: 1`171 FILL; 3/4 -inch roadbase gravel. ® TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay with scattered gravel, organics, firm, slightly moist, dark brown. CLAY (CL); silty, sandy, scattered gravel, very stiff, moist, brown. P SAND AND GRAVEL (SM -GM); silty, slightly clayey, medium dense, slightly moist to moist, brown. oGRAVEL (GM); sandy, silty, with cobbles and probable boulders, medium dense to dense, slightly moist to wet below groundwater level, brown to reddish brown. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2 -inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. 33/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 33 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. 0,1 Free water level in boring and number of days after drilling measurement was made. TPractical drilling refusal. Where shown above bottom of log, indicates that multiple attempts were made to advance the boring. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on November 17 and 18, 2008 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by taping from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve LEGEND AND NOTES I Figure 3 =:ult_: m Q OD OD O T- 6 Z m O U F- Z J J (n a w Z U w W ~ O w O Y w J m O QF -JCo CL V. = O Ix x O a a 2 w M I (n w 3 73 -u 6 1 cz cz cz cC wO Y CJ CJ C7 C7 CO 0:m cz m � va d Ci WW >_= W co c!) LL 0W d W d Zjr OV) U rn x Qoe J J z a O w m UJ Q �� e J F� 0 Lu 7N> W CtmnO W ^, It N N N t- M N aaz v zz z :F 4 M CA M N N -� M H a a J p' O W a N N M a N U W CL Q Z O LU H O W Q\ O ' ON d O� Z00 z t H d Q O U O J C a HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 2 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 108 618A HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION TE (MINA NCH) kP2 59 15 23 Y2 22 %8 % 120 22 Ya 22% '/ 22% 22 Y2 Ye 22 Y2 22% A 54 15 24 /e 24 % % 120 24'/4 24 Ya 'A 24% 24 Ya 24 23 Ya Y8 P-3 60'/2 15 27% 27% 27% 271/2 A Y8 120 27Y2 27% Ye 27% 27'/4 Ya Note: Percolation test holes were drilled with a 4 -inch diameter continuous flight auger and soaked on November 17, 2008. Percolation tests were conducted on November 18, 2008. The average percolation rates were based on the last two readings of each test. G (E of tech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL May 6, 2009 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road hg Glenwood Springs, Colorado 51601 Phone: 970-945-7955 Fix: 970-945,8454 email: hpgeoQhpgeotech.coan Mr. and Mrs. Michael Silverman 40 West 77TH Street, Apt. 9B New York, New York 10024 Job No. 108 618A Subject: Additional Percolation Testing, Lot 1, Hidden Meadows, 5720 Snowmass Creek Road, Pitkin County, Colorado Dear Mr. and Mrs. Michael Silverman As requested by High Country Engineering, Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc., performed additional percolation testing at the subject site. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations and percolation test at the site and presented our findings in a report dated December 9, 2008, Job No. 108 618A. The proposed septic disposal area is located on a relatively flat topographic bench above Snowmass Creek. The existing septic disposal area is located on an upper topographic bench about ten feet higher in elevation and separated by moderately steep slope varying in width. Free water was observed in the previous profile boring and test holes at a depth of 1 %2 feet to 2' %2 feet below the ground surface. A profile boring was drilled and four percolation test holes were hand dug on April 29, 2009 at the locations shown on Figure 1. The profile boring was drilled about 6 feet higher in elevation than the lower bench. The subsoils encountered in Profile Boring 2 consisted of about 8 inches of topsoil overlying silty clayey sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders to the bottom boring depth of 8 feet. The results of a percent finer than sand size gradation analysis performed on a sample of silty clayey sandy gravel obtained from a depth of 4.5 feet in Profile Boring 2 showed 40 percent passing the No. 200 sieve and a !^ moisture content of 14.3 percent. No free water was encountered at time of drilling and the boring had caved at 7.5 feet with possible groundwater in the bottom when checked the following day. Percolation test holes were hand dug and soaked with water on April 29, 2009. Percolation Hole P 7 was drilled with 6 inch diameter auger. Percolation testing was conducted on April 30, 2009, by a representative of Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. The percolation rates varied from 14 minutes per inch to 30 minutes per inch with an overall average of 21 minutes per inch. The percolation test Parker 303-541-7119 0 Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 .e Silverthorne 970-468-1989 Mr. and Mrs. Michael Silverman May 6, 2009 Page 2 results are summarized on Table 1. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for an engineered on site waste disposal system. Pitkin County requires that a professional civil engineer design the septic disposal system. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Louis E. Eller Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. LEE/ksw attachments Figure 1 — Location of Percolation Test Holes Table 1 — Percolation Test Results cc: High Country Engineering - Attn: Amber Gregory Cottle Car Yaw Architect — Attn: Todd Kennedy Job No. 108 618A G8d'55teCh APPROXIMATE SCALE 1"=50' APPROXIMATE -,, CENTERLINE HOLY CROSS EASEMENT C� 7070 50' WILDCAT EQUESTRIAN EASEMENT & UTILITY EASEMENT / .P5 -P 6 / A P1 P2 / / PROFILE -P . /0 OBORING 1 �A A 7080/ r + P 3 / - - / / 15' UTILITY .v. —i u1wviw1. LOT 2 (TYPICAL} / EASEMENT 0 PROFILE BORING FOR PREVIOUS STUDY. , PERCOLATION TEST HOLE FOR THIS STUDY. 7090 A PERCOLATION TEST HOLE FOR PREVIOUS STUDY. 108 618A a(`�~Ch -r7 LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fture 1 HEPWORfiFPAWLAK GEOlEcmicAL AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES 9 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 108 618A HOLE N0. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P4 12 15 Water Added 6 51/4 3/4 23 51/4 41/2 3/4 53/4 51/4 1/2 51/4 41/2 3/4 41/2 33/4 3/4 33/4 31/4 1/2 Ps 16 15 Water Added Water Added 7 41/2 21/2 15 41/2 2 21/2 61/4 1 43/4 11/2 51/2 41/2 1 41/2 31/2 1 31/2 21/2 1 P6 15 15 Water Added Water Added 6 31/4 23/4 14 31/4 1 21/4 6 41/2 11/2 41/2 31/2 1 43/4 31/2 11/4 31/2 21/2 1 P7 36 15 12 111/2 1/2 30 111/2 11 1/2 11 101/2 1/2 201/2 10 1/2 10 91/2 1/2 91/2 9 1/2 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug and soaked on April 29, 2009. Percolation tests were conducted on April 30, 2009. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test. u InSrEcnon PDRTs wE \ / / D. DETAILS FOROSIALNG \ /$ PIPE IN$TALUTON. SUR / \ / /LOCATION IS REWIRED F L \ / \ / Z FIELD COMPONENTS �ury�pp y � o t z TOTAL DESIGN FLOW - 900 GPD 1 ALL OCONSTRUCTIULATIONS NNDI SHALL BE SEAGE N AACCORDANCE WITH DISPOSASYSTEMS, THE PIEVEN THOUGH REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. U4a 01 <ag 60 ^ W1(jim ALL SUCH THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH SPECIFIC DETAILS AS 00 04 3 <t7 w REFERRED TO IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED REGULATIONS. ZU 04 00�j FOR ? FLOWRESIDENCE S.F. c.F.1 OZ 7¢ 8 TDO. - i 2 3 S.F. (< 8.000 V SW p 64 800GPD-AVERAGE OA ED;OONON ' 75 GALLONS/PERSON/DAY IS: mQ)0 • - 900 GPD (0) UUCl DESIGN FLOW - 1.5 AVERAGE �wm%W SEPTIC TANK: m0 t W] U MINIMUM TOTAL TANK SIZE: y m 8. BED BOTTOM AND SIDEWAUS MUST BE RAKED TO REMOVE SOIL SMEARS Q 1 DAY//24 HRS - 30 HRS = 1125 GPO INSTALL ONE 1250 -GALLON TANK NTH BAFFLE STANDARD ABSORPTION AREA: ABSORPTION LATERALS SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 FEET IN LENGTH. TOTAL DESIGN FLOW - 900 GPD A = • P 0=MAXIMUM FLOW P=LOADING FACTOR 1.4 THE BOTTOM OF EACH ABSORPTION BED SHALL BE LEVEL -2,-rt t=PERCOLATION RATE - 21 min./in. 1 - 900 21 • 1.4 - 1155 SF Z WITH 20S REDUCTION FOR DOSING 924 N TOTAL SF NEEDED = 924 SF > USE INFILTRATOR SYSTEM QUICK 4 STANDARD CHAMBER OR EQUAL IN TRENCH CONFIGURATION: BED LATERALS SHALL FOLLOW CONTOURS. 924 SF O 9.87 SF UNIT = 94 UNITS USE MIN. 98 INFILTRATOR SYSTEMS INC'S INFILTRATOR QUICK 4 INSTALL INFILTRATOR IN ACCORDANCE WTH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. STANDARD CHAMBER IN BED SYSTEM EFFECTIVE AREA PER UNIT -9.87 S.F. PROPOSED ElL (PROPOSEO HOUSE) TOTAL AVERAGE DAILY FLOW = 600 GPD AREA OF INFLUENCE OE ON FLOW 800 GPO • 1.50 - 900 GPD FOR FIRST 1.000 GPD; 100 FEE,TTVCCHH Q DAY OF FLOW OVER 000 GGAIELONS 100 GALLONS PER O (900 - 1000 100 - -1 -1 8 - ET N/A OR 0' 0 FEET + 100 FEET = 100 FEET (WELL SETBACK) O Z 3. CLEAN OUTS ARE REQUIRED AT ALL BENDS AND A MINIMUM OF 100 FEET ALONG THE HOUSE SEVER. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL WATERTIGHT COMPONENTS, PRIOR TO THE ABSORPTION AREA, TO PREVENT INFILTRATION. m N N o 5. TOPSOIL COVER MAY BE VARIED (WITH 1 FOOT MINIMUM) TO ALLOW ; FOR NON -INTRUSIVE LANDSCAPING. � w 6. INSTALL RISERS AS NECESSARY TO BRING ALL ACCESS POINTS TO G WITHIN ONE-HALF FOOT OF FINAL GRADE. U14 0 _ 7. LOCATIONS OF ALL COMPONENTS MAY BE VARIED AS NECESSARY AS LONG O AS ALL MINIMUM DISTANCES AND SLOPES MEET THOSE REQUIRED. Z IOD m 8. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM ABSORPTION 0 O FIELD AREA USING DRAINAGE SWALES AS NECESSARY.U ��/1�1 U111 9. SOILS INFORMATION PROVIDED BY HP GEOTECH, JOB NUMBER 108-618A. DATED MAY 6, 2009. \/ Coll U N 10. THIS DRAWING GOES NOT ITE AN 1505 PERMIT. PERMIT MUST BE Z 3 � 1XZ al OBTAINED FROM APPROPRIATETATE CITY OR COUNTY OFFICIALS. rx j ONj Na01e ENGINEER MUST OBSERVE CONSTRUCTED SYSTEM BEFORE BACKFILL W U m p O AND PROVIDE REPORT TO COUNTY. Z O O n 11. THIS SYSTEM IS SIZED FOR TYPICAL DOMESTIC WASTES ONLY. BACKWASH w Om, OR FLUSHING FLOWS FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS UNITS OR WATER SOFTENERSZ ` u OR FILTERS SHOULD NOT BE INTRODUCED INTO THIS SYSTEM.Z N � LL W LL O 12. INSTALL BLU CARD INSULATION OVER SEVER PIPE WHEREVER DEPTH IS 111 W V CI n U LESS THAN 5.0 FEET. 0 13. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONTACTED FOR STE INSPECTION PRIOR TO Z 0 ; BACKFILLING OF SYSTEM COMPONENTS. w � N 14. THE SUBSOILS EXPOSED IN THE PROFILE PIT CONSISTED OF 1 -FOOT OF Til Q N f Ol TOPSOIL UNDERLAIN BY SILTY, CLAYEY, SANDY GRAVEL WTH COBBLES AND BOULDERS TO A MAXIMUM EXPLORED DEPTH OF 8', POSSBLE GROUNDWATER WAS ENCOUNTERED. NO (y�F�I m 7 m BEDROCK WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED. lz C W W W 15. SITE PUN INFORMATION, AND TOPOGRAPHY, NUMBER OF BEDROOMS, SIZE OF HOUSE PROVIDED y0 %Q BY COY ARCHITECTS. Z N= C= 16. LEACH FIELD MUST BE SURVEYED AFTER INSTALLATION FOR ACCURATE LOCATION III Z a W a FOR FINAL FIELD INSPECTION AND VRITEOFF. a, Q 17. DESIGN OF THE SYSTEM BASED ON A PERCOLATION RATE OF 21 mpi AND NO WATER OR BED Q > M ROCK IN THE PERCOLCATION HOLES. I Z P_ 18. SEPTIC TANKS TANKS ARE TO BE ANCHORED IF GROUNDWATER IS ENCOUNTERED. ''In Nr TV 1. ABSORPTION LATERALS SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 FEET IN LENGTH. 2. THE BOTTOM OF EACH ABSORPTION BED SHALL BE LEVEL 1 3. DRAINAGE SWALES ARE TO BE PROVIDED ABOVE AND AROUND BED, AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT SURFACE RUNOFF FROM ENTERING ABSORPTION AREA. 4. BED LATERALS SHALL FOLLOW CONTOURS. 5. INSTALL INFILTRATOR IN ACCORDANCE WTH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 8. BED BOTTOM AND SIDEWAUS MUST BE RAKED TO REMOVE SOIL SMEARS INCURRED DURING EXCAVATION. 7. NO EXCAVATION OF ABSORPTION FIELD IS TO BE DONE DURING NET WEATHER W 8. AND USE OF RUBBER TIRE VEHICLES OVER ABSORPTION AREA IS PROHIBITED UNSUITABLE MATERIAL EXISTING WITHIN THE BED SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND 0U Q U W Z C9 G BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF ONSITE SELECT OR PIT -RUN MATERIAL U) O WQ Q FW HGU WlWO N NOTE: -1U Z AN EXISTING ISOS WAS COMPLETED FOR THE SITE IN 2002. THE DESIGN WAS COMPLETED Q Z a ] N BY CHURCH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. THE DESIGN CALLED FOR A 1,500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK AND 21 UNITS FOR AN ABSORPTION TRENCH. THIS SYSTEM } Q 9 0 IS TO BE ABANDONED IN PLACE. WHERE NEW INFILTRATOR UNITS CONFlLCT WITH U U >- a EXISTING UNITS THE UNITS ARE TO BE REMOVED TO B' FROM THE NEW UNITS. U Z W 3 (A ALL OF THE EXCAVATED UNITS ARE TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF OFFSTE. TIME EXISTING DOSING PUMP, SEPTIC TANK AND PANEL ARE TO BE SAVED AND Q RE-UTIZED. PUMP AND PANEL SHALL BE TESTED AND ANY WORN OR BROKEN ..I Z PARTS ARE TO BE REPLACED. PICTURES HAVE BEEN SHOVM TO TIME ORENCO DEALER AND DEALER INDICATED THAT THERE IS NO REASON THAT THE SYSTEM D - SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR REUSE. QPERCOLATION BORING PRO -ECT NO. GRAPHIC SCALE 2091004.00 IN 1 min = 20 n. ISDS Table 5:28-t Mtt4m4tm t40tizonta4 Distances (in Feet) Betty en OWTS Cor-pan"IS and Pertet"t physical Features DOSING SYSTEM NOTES N.T.S. 1. SNATCHES TO BE MERCURY FLOAT TYPE. 2. PUMP SHALL BE CAPABLE OF 20 GPM AND 30' OF HEAD. NOTE THAT EXISTING ORENCO SYSTEM SHOULD BE CAPABLE OF THESE NUMBERS. PLEASE SUBMIT PUMP IDENTIFICATION VMEN PUMP IS TESTED. 3. ALARM SHALL BE BOTH AUDIBLE AND VISIBLE , LOCATED WITHIN THE HOUSE AND ON A CIRCUIT SEPARATE FROM PUMP. 4. DOSING PIPE SHALL BE PVC AND SHALL BE DRILLED WITH 1/8' HOLES EVERY 3' AND BE PLACED SO THAT THE HOLE FACES UP. 5. DOSING PIPE CAN BE ZIP TIED TO CHAMBERS OR CAN BE PLACED ON SUPPORTS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. ramrpngs of vwoacntrtents may De 1temill ed at. the Dmfs idemPea try sills ltaWmte. mwwdmt n, 2t irmk;M Water or Wmvew:itwt rxrwi enea,enl RN -0 least 14 tent tial eaeti.we:'e the [m' mtv "m scned.* raAr%} at nem r m" be'md NAlt t4&s a :Ati.MC a tlreNt4Et to Vasey wine :m'.r arw rXAn: e" e, ; se Otb NDew . Qta- e,IKC1 U4- u Uh east `' ieowe Q rat N must De glued Or se -i M Ki a vrjW119" fashwn 101he WXK 19* entaSetTAYi; pie. Trwe -s%t re a tate of silBeAent size 10 accammoute the Ke A the I04W mast Mectm OT Rhe rlagedcap so triar ate OOrNeYa`tCe ap'e 9ests On the tKH<='y Doe zsxasernetf pgac. The area aT senior Un.' y�,. c'Easses Inrnxg4 7x� �'+q ..:yas mar,1 x �;catert vk+Ln :xt r+A.'a urxb:T�Tnxia 1t>arznl a n"We Nah "t ape tr,M'Mt ^' AW B iez! aazFliOrral ffik?arKC hr Race 1iXS -:;i 0 �r 3C:'igT 4k"JN'v4t t.+Y1D r2p0. ��Tless k GNt to ^xldafEV pJ a pE x Cuanea est nkat a niectlarkcw a natural w me .0 pr rit Caria<tNtM1PJn. it a PE Or gjaiUt-o ;7ecAGq s1 Ctx'rirs , 4O exervbe N& 000n, he:'::i@. Khat sxttWA to I* Dewtmcnl a EM°tatea':nit@n e.Pp viaRikfi (k4'- as Sili>-pW ng dattuat.Oftc rhn "uotri` aria c1NTVltca Vv Le'IK%35A':'Ce5 wtl} lite r' "Waal s-0-1 "4D -A ostarr tis' e'acrt 100 GP0 xwastew3ler 134K% neCCSs:TI}. NATURAL BACKFILL N.T.S. IF DOSING IS PROPOSED MANIFOLD ALL PIPES TOGETHER. 1Z' MIN. WVEROVER AND KEEP MANIFOLD LEVEL DURING BACKFILL \ 30' MA%. C BED SIDES V4FL7RA10R UNIT (TYP.) BED CROSS SE.CTION (TYP.) N.T.S Table 6.28-4 Summary of Allowable Reductions Trench Bed Pipe and Gravel 10°!D ..ma Dosing 20% 20% Chambers (between 5 - 50 MPI) 30% 10% MAXIMUM REDUCTION 50% 1�v11� ALLOWED Every 6 Months Every A Years Constructed Wetlands As Specified by PE Designing tie S stem N.A. New Technology Systems Every 6 Months or More Frequent a Recommended by P£ Per Manufacturer's Recommendation SEVER UNE - a 12 O I � 4' 0 PERFORATED PIPE rc AbsorpW. Trench, Ati smpDon Bed. '$.and Fatter (sas axc2phons hero.), 100"' 25 26 20 10 Mai 2612, WM I5ai S.Dsuftce torspe'sal . stklr.. w D *'IeN a. s eel Sa a =§Iter 30 1 TO 25 18 1 10 1 25 1 10 > 25 15 a Ur Ime1 Haws Face* m Soil WAb a Pemolaten 100 2$ 26 Is i0 2$ 1s 25 1s Rate r 60 MPI Lined W;;te;;a r POW 50 t0 25 15 10 25 10 25 15 I Untined or Partially Line4100"' Wastewater Pond 25 25 15 10 2° 15 25 15 Dispersat Syswrr: Usmg Aeroso3 MemoCs 100`x'' 10 50 125 10 262` 1& : m t6 ' V31,11 .an• __...._. 5D 10 25 15 10 10 2` 1 i 9epttc Tanks Pamagee. I Plants, Do" M Pumpang, 50eez 10 25 e 10 50 10 50 is Gitamu�. vaMns Ptpes g S uer ar ErTkiem_.._ 50ttt t4 25'h D fliesIvii 1C"... 5(N't t5tn DOSING SYSTEM NOTES N.T.S. 1. SNATCHES TO BE MERCURY FLOAT TYPE. 2. PUMP SHALL BE CAPABLE OF 20 GPM AND 30' OF HEAD. NOTE THAT EXISTING ORENCO SYSTEM SHOULD BE CAPABLE OF THESE NUMBERS. PLEASE SUBMIT PUMP IDENTIFICATION VMEN PUMP IS TESTED. 3. ALARM SHALL BE BOTH AUDIBLE AND VISIBLE , LOCATED WITHIN THE HOUSE AND ON A CIRCUIT SEPARATE FROM PUMP. 4. DOSING PIPE SHALL BE PVC AND SHALL BE DRILLED WITH 1/8' HOLES EVERY 3' AND BE PLACED SO THAT THE HOLE FACES UP. 5. DOSING PIPE CAN BE ZIP TIED TO CHAMBERS OR CAN BE PLACED ON SUPPORTS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. ramrpngs of vwoacntrtents may De 1temill ed at. the Dmfs idemPea try sills ltaWmte. mwwdmt n, 2t irmk;M Water or Wmvew:itwt rxrwi enea,enl RN -0 least 14 tent tial eaeti.we:'e the [m' mtv "m scned.* raAr%} at nem r m" be'md NAlt t4&s a :Ati.MC a tlreNt4Et to Vasey wine :m'.r arw rXAn: e" e, ; se Otb NDew . Qta- e,IKC1 U4- u Uh east `' ieowe Q rat N must De glued Or se -i M Ki a vrjW119" fashwn 101he WXK 19* entaSetTAYi; pie. Trwe -s%t re a tate of silBeAent size 10 accammoute the Ke A the I04W mast Mectm OT Rhe rlagedcap so triar ate OOrNeYa`tCe ap'e 9ests On the tKH<='y Doe zsxasernetf pgac. The area aT senior Un.' y�,. c'Easses Inrnxg4 7x� �'+q ..:yas mar,1 x �;catert vk+Ln :xt r+A.'a urxb:T�Tnxia 1t>arznl a n"We Nah "t ape tr,M'Mt ^' AW B iez! aazFliOrral ffik?arKC hr Race 1iXS -:;i 0 �r 3C:'igT 4k"JN'v4t t.+Y1D r2p0. ��Tless k GNt to ^xldafEV pJ a pE x Cuanea est nkat a niectlarkcw a natural w me .0 pr rit Caria<tNtM1PJn. it a PE Or gjaiUt-o ;7ecAGq s1 Ctx'rirs , 4O exervbe N& 000n, he:'::i@. Khat sxttWA to I* Dewtmcnl a EM°tatea':nit@n e.Pp viaRikfi (k4'- as Sili>-pW ng dattuat.Oftc rhn "uotri` aria c1NTVltca Vv Le'IK%35A':'Ce5 wtl} lite r' "Waal s-0-1 "4D -A ostarr tis' e'acrt 100 GP0 xwastew3ler 134K% neCCSs:TI}. NATURAL BACKFILL N.T.S. IF DOSING IS PROPOSED MANIFOLD ALL PIPES TOGETHER. 1Z' MIN. WVEROVER AND KEEP MANIFOLD LEVEL DURING BACKFILL \ 30' MA%. C BED SIDES V4FL7RA10R UNIT (TYP.) BED CROSS SE.CTION (TYP.) N.T.S Table 6.28-4 Summary of Allowable Reductions NATURAL GROUND Table 6.28-8 Maintenance and Cleaning Frequency Type of Component Trench Bed Pipe and Gravel 10°!D 0% Dosing 20% 20% Chambers (between 5 - 50 MPI) 30% 10% MAXIMUM REDUCTION 50% 30% ALLOWED Every 6 Months Every A Years NATURAL GROUND Table 6.28-8 Maintenance and Cleaning Frequency Type of Component Irspecticn/M iMenance Cleaned orPumped Septic Tanks Every Z Years Every 2 Years, or As Needed Vaults. Privies When Pumped At 80% Capacity Secondary Treatment Systems; Advanced Secondary Treatment Systems: Other Manufactured Units Every 6 Months Per Manufacturer's Recommendation Absorption Areas Every 6 Months N.A. Dosing or pumping Chambers Every 6 Months Every A Years Constructed Wetlands As Specified by PE Designing tie S stem N.A. New Technology Systems Every 6 Months or More Frequent a Recommended by P£ Per Manufacturer's Recommendation REMOVABLE PVC INSTALL MARKER IS TO BE BURIED FINISH GRADE — INFILTRATOR DETAIL FOR TRENCH OR BED N.T.S. 4" RISER e 45' SWEEP BEND ex 4' xe— PVC WYE CLEAN OUT ASSEMBLY SEWER CLEAN OUT DETAIL N.T.S. EXISTING PUMP z nw O 3orn� pONf zLL Nz to68n Sz' 8 U^�° 0 Ln0 � 4 N N U _ s Z m r 0 0 V OnOW Z ON ?N 3O ON§ Jas z W 0 0O O On W AM 00, Z U 0. LL � j za Z `9a W lz m HW. "m WO Wn >— Mm z HO >O Z wa ya Z 5 OW W m U z _ _ a U I _ m 0 1n� Wp J J wa = - Iz G <� <(A W .J u2 �9 t a =1 O Z PROJECT NO. 2091004.00 ISDS2 REMOVABLE PVC CAP INSTALL MARKER IF CAP IS TO BURIED CUT HOLE IN TOP OF 4' 0 INFILTRATOR UNIT FOR INSTALUTION OF INSPECTION SOLID PIPE WELL PIPE SIDESUSE ROUGHENm PLASTIC TIE STRAPS TO HANG 2'o PERFORATED PIPE IN INFILTRATOR UNITS 4' COUPLING PUNNg SEVER UNE - 12 O I � 4' 0 PERFORATED PIPE INFILTRATOR DETAIL FOR TRENCH OR BED N.T.S. 4" RISER e 45' SWEEP BEND ex 4' xe— PVC WYE CLEAN OUT ASSEMBLY SEWER CLEAN OUT DETAIL N.T.S. EXISTING PUMP z nw O 3orn� pONf zLL Nz to68n Sz' 8 U^�° 0 Ln0 � 4 N N U _ s Z m r 0 0 V OnOW Z ON ?N 3O ON§ Jas z W 0 0O O On W AM 00, Z U 0. LL � j za Z `9a W lz m HW. "m WO Wn >— Mm z HO >O Z wa ya Z 5 OW W m U z _ _ a U I _ m 0 1n� Wp J J wa = - Iz G <� <(A W .J u2 �9 t a =1 O Z PROJECT NO. 2091004.00 ISDS2 \J 3 -0,- > O to = W�nN W �_ m ODTJ .��p °0 8Zm o = p om�o m <zmcn �G e �b err =gym N Sic Z�m n m 1p SZ xN m om a'p mo ^'"' 0' 0 Om z m'U 3NN� m �m zz �' �� m m < S mNooD i1 / ? r A �o> nD ° $m Z t�ii m z 3 D �< Z N�m 1 om m m{ ° �0OK oo>> C) D mN rm ° D �rcn W >D ODS X §o— o m ov <_Zm� ;Urr bm < rn m 3Nc �� �� 3 o f rn� N< _�< L.3T.p pM O�m�%3 OWN �< Z N�m 1 om m m{ ° �0OK oo>> C) D mN rm ° A cn M A 3 12 _IIo' D D L1 D A c � 0 -4 X in W (n�Z >D OD m °� °oN O n = Oo�o m <mma, (nom ��mwm •^ arm < 3Nc ocmi ��� g� "gym �< v_'�mp Om mgNoa -1-i =�� ami -AC v om 000 Z� 000c, n D mN ? o A �, m Z 3 z � j 7 } k§d fr z i \ f 2 §8 - n : ; § 2 2 z m > CO < ` ƒ I ) § M§ ¥ ] z § § # 7 § ] o \ $ m ®2!7! \ m 2 2 ° i2GE=t { .. �) '' .. , G o v $ o > 2 $ m z I)® ` ° -N4 / 2 \ 2 §G e ] ¢ \ \ k / wk z r ® E § @ `� ) a # § , 2 ` § q § Q < ° .. , ® 2 ƒ $ 2 \ / �» Certificate of Occupancy Aspen * Pitkin Community Development Department This certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of section 109 of the 1994 edition of the.unifdrm building code. it certifies that at the,date of issuance, the structure as described below was in compliance with the various resolutions and ordinances regulating building construction and use in this jurisdiction. Use Classification: Single Family Residence Building Permit: 0063.1999 Legal Description: Lot 1 Hidden Meadows Subdivision Building Address: 5720 Snowmass Creek Road Owner of Building: Patricia Nettleship Owner Address: 2665 Main Street #220 Santa Monica, CA 90405 'Group: R-2 Type Construction: V -N Use Zone: RS -30 Description: 1727 square foot addition which includes a two car attached ?ara-e, dining room, family/rec room, office, exercise room, two storage rooms, one laundry and a loft. Comments & Restrictions: Chief Building Official Date Note: In all occupancies, except R, this certificate must be posted in a conspicuous place near the main exit on the premises for which it is issued. Any alteration or use of these described premises or portion thereof without the written approval of the Building Official shall negate this C.O. and subject it to revocation. Form No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GWS -25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 APPLICANT EXST WELL PERMIT NUMBER 275581 DIV. 5 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD wr. 1 oiocK: ruing: JUDaw: BIDDEN MEADOWS APPROVED WELL LOCATION PITKIN COUNTY NW 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 14 NETTLESHIP FAMILY PARTNERSHIP III Township 9 S Range 86 W Sixth P.M. 5720 SNOWMASS CREEK ROAD DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES SNOWMASS, CO 81654- 1725 Ft. from South Section Line 1560 Ft. from East Section Line UTM COORDINATES (Meters Zone:13 NAD83) 'ERMIT TO USE AN EXISTING WELL Easting: Northing: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) Construction details for this existing well have not been provided to this office; therefore, it is not known if the construction of this well is in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules, 2 CCR 402-2. The issuance of this permit does not relieve the well owner of responsibility or liability in the event contamination of the groundwater source results from the construction or use of this well, nor does the State Engineer assume any responsibility or liability should contamination occur. 3) Approved pursuant: to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(11)(A) as the only well on a residential site of 5.16 acre(s) described as lot 1, Hidden Meadows Subdivision, Pitkin County. Further identified as 5720 Snowmass Creek Road, Snowmass, CO 81654. 4) Approved for a location correction, and the installation of a pump in, and the use of, an existing well, constructed on an unknown date, to an unknown depth, under permit no. 111566 (Expired). 5) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside one single family dwelling. The ground water shall not be used for irrigation or other purposes. This well is known as Nettleship Well. 6) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 7) The return now from the use of this well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 8) This well shall be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. NOTE: Expired permit no. 111566 was previously issued for this lot. ` 7 Jai NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 49-2645-144-01 -001 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R006306 �� 7 APPROVED DMW a—lid Y� �. _ 7✓ State eer g ,Receipt No. 9502912 DATE ISSUED 10-11-2007 By DATE l" Form No. GWS- i t 8/2007 STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, CO 80203 Phone — Info: (303) 866-3587 Main: (303) 866-3581 303 866-3589 hftP:/1www-water.state.co.us R Mice Use Only R E C E � 7i�� 026 '07Fax: ���EIV�© WATER MsoURCEg STATE FNomesR of erowvon OCT S 2047 wATBR RBSouRCES €lTATA9P� 1NR 1.0 CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP/ADDRESS CORRECTION OF THE WELL LOCATION Review instructions an the reverse side prior to co mpleting the form. Name. address and ghofhe of the person claimino ownership of the well NAME(S): Michael 3nd Yvonne Silverman Mailing Address: 40 West 77"' Street. Apt 9B City, St. Zip: New York, NY 10024 Phone 212 787-6711 This form is filed by the named individual/entity claiming that they are the owner of the well permitted as referenced above. This filing is made pursuant to C.R.S. 37-90-143. WELL LOCATION: Well Permit Number 275581 Receipt Number: 9502912 County Pitkin Well Name or # (optional) (Address) (State) (Zip) NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, Sec.14, Twp..Q ❑ N. or 0 S., Range 8¢ ❑ E. or ® W., _ 6th P.M. Distance from Section Lines: 1725 Ft. From ❑ N. or ® S., 1560 Ft. From ® E. or ❑ W. Line. Subdivision Name Hidden Meadows Lot 1 , Block , Filing/Unit The above listed owner(s) say(s) that he, she (they) own the well described herein. The existing record is being amended for the following reasons: ® Change in name of owner ® Change in mailing address ❑ Correction of location for exempt wells permitted prior to May 8, 1972 and non-exempt wells permitted before May 17, 1965. Please see the reverse side for further information regarding correction of the well location. I (we) claim and say that I (we) (are) the owner(s) of the well described above, know the contents of the statements made herein, and state that they are true tom our knowledge. Signature(s) of the new owner Please print the Signer's Name & Title Date Y ro+n5 l� �� �rrvLAk t� 07 he responsibility of the new owner of this well to complete and sign the form. Signatures of agents are acceptable if an c)riginal letter of agency signed by the owner is attached to the form uann ik rponai„t r++r State Engineer ACCEPTFr) A"- A CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP ANDIOR MAILING ADDRESS. 4By44— Date HOLLAND&HART, pi February 18, 2011 Glenn Horn, AICD Davis horn. Inc. 215 South Monarch Aspen, CO 8 161 1 Re: Silverman Water Rights (Lot 1, Hidden Meadows) Dear Glenn: Marls E. Hamilton Phone 970-429-6890 Fax 970-925-9367 mehamYlton@hollandhart.com For your use in support of Michael & Yvonne Silverman's building permit application for their propert} along Snowmass Creek, enclosed are: Final decree of the water court in Case No. 07CW230. Water Division No. 5; 2. Well Permit No. 275581 (and transfer thereol'to the Silvermans). As you will see. in Case No. 07CW2 30 the water court approved the Silvermans' application for water rights and approval of a plan for augmentation. Pursuant to these approvals, the Silvermans have confirmed a legal water supply that allows use ofthe well on the property for ordinary household purposes within one residence, and use of water diverted from Snowmass Creek for irrigation of up to 1.25 acres (including 0.55 acres of lawns/gardens and 0.7 acres of pasture). to till an outdoor hot tub and/or other water features (whose total surface area shall not exceed 175 square feet). and for tire protection. I trust that these materials are adequate to support the Silvermans" building permit application. Please let me know if you have any questions concerning the water supply for this property. for Holland & Ifart :1 i, MEH/ cc: Michael & Yvonne Silverman Holland & HartuP Attorneys at Law Phone (970) 925-3476 Fax (970) 925-9367 www.holtandhart.com 600 East Main Street, Suite 104 Aspen, CO 81611-1091 Aspn aan.ngs aase aoucoer ranonn city cr eyennr caaaro VrmOs Dene De( -w Tech center Jackson Nae Las Ve aem saa Late otv sante ce waOingtw D.C. Granted The moving party is hereby ORDERED to provide a copy of this Order to any pro se parties who have entered an appearance in this action within 10 days from the date of this order. RT, WATER DIVISION NO. 5, COLORADO 109 Eighth Street, Ste. 104 Glenwood Springs, CO 81401 (970) 945-5075 Concerning the Application for Water Rights of: MICHAEL SILVERMAN AND YVONNE SILVERMAN In Pitkin, Summit and Eagle Counties, Colorado. James B. Boyd District Court Judge Date of Order attached COURT USE ONLY Case Number: 07CW230 FINDINGS OF FACT, RULING OF REFEREE, AND JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF WATER COURT This matter came before the Court upon the Application of Michael and Yvonne Silverman for Storage Right, Surface Water Rights, Ground Water Right, and Approval of Plan for Augmentation Including Exchange (hereinafter, the "Application") filed on December 27, 2007. The Water Judge referred the Application to the undersigned as Water Referee for Water Division No. 5, State of Colorado, in accordance with Article 92 of Chapter 37, Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, known as the Water Rights Determination and Administration Act of 1969. The undersigned Referee has made such investigations as are necessary to determine whether or not the statements in the Application are true, has become fully advised with respect to the subject matter of the Application and has consulted with the Division Engineer for Water Division No. 5. The Referee hereby makes the following determination and ruling as the Referee in this matter. District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 2 of 18 I. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Name and address of Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman 40 West 77th Street, Apt. 9B New York, NY 10024 w/copy to: Mark E. Hamilton, Atty. Reg. #24585 HOLLAND & HART LLP 600 E. Main St., Suite 104 Aspen, CO 81611 Telephone: (970) 925-3476 Facsimile: (866) 784-7682 Email: mehamilton@hollandhart.com 2. Applicants filed the Application on December 27, 2007. 3. The Application was properly published in the resume for Water Division No. 5. All notices required by law have been made, and the Court has jurisdiction over the Application and over all of the parties in this case. 4. None of the water rights or sources thereof involved in this Application are located within a designated ground water basin. 5. The Colorado Water Conservation Board ("CWCB") and Polk Properties, LLC both filed timely Statements of Opposition to the Application. No other statements of opposition were filed, and the time for filing such statements has expired. The CWCB approved entry of a ruling in this matter pursuant to a stipulation with the Applicants filed on September 9, 2010, and Polk Properties approved entry of a ruling in this matter pursuant to a stipulation with the Applicants filed on January 27, 2010. District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 3 of 18 FIRST CLAIM: CONDITIONAL WATER STORAGE RIGHT 6. Silverman Augmentation Tank: a. Legal description: The center of the tank will be located in one of the following alternate locations: i) In the NW'/ of the SE'/ of Section 14, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6th P.M., at a point approximately 1,560 feet from the East section line and 1,810 feet from the South section line. See Exhibit A. ii) In the NW'/ of the SEI/4 of Section 14, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6th P.M., at a point approximately 1,600 feet from the East section line and 1,600 feet from the South section line. See Exhibit A. b. Source: Snowmass Creek, tributary to Roaring Fork River, tributary to Colorado River. The Silverman Augmentation Tank will be filled by: i) Silverman Spring with a capacity of 15 g.p.m. (0.033 c.f.s.) and a point of diversion described in Paragraph 8.a. below. ii) Silverman Pump and Pipeline with a capacity of 0.25 c.f.s. and a point of diversion described in Paragraph 7.a. below. C. Appropriation information: i) Date of initiation of appropriation: December 27, 2007. ii) How appropriation was initiated: By formation of requisite intent to appropriate coupled with actions manifesting such an intent sufficient to put third parties on notice, including, but not limited to site investigations and water supply planning by water resources consultants, and filing of subject Application. iii) Date water applied to beneficial use: N/A. d. Amount claimed: 0.8 acre feet active storage, conditional. C. Use or proposed use: augmentation, fire protection and the right to fill and refill in priority. District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 4 of 18 f. Remarks: this structure will consist of one or more enclosed water storage tanks totaling up to 0.8 AF in capacity, all active storage, with the ability to directly release water into Snowmass Creek via an outlet pipe. SECOND CLAIM: ABSOLUTE AND CONDITIONAL SURFACE WATER RIGHTS 7. Silverman Pump and Pipeline: a. Legal description: In the NW'/ of the SE'/< of Section 14, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6th P.M., at a point approximately 1,700 feet from the East section line and 1,700 feet from the South section line. See Exhibit A. b. Source: Snowmass Creek, tributary to Roaring Fork River, tributary to Colorado River. C. Appropriation information: i) Date of initiation of appropriation: April 30, 1989 for irrigation and fire protection; December 27, 2007 for recreation, and to fill and refill the Silverman Augmentation Tank. ii) How appropriation was initiated: for absolute appropriation, by installation of the pump station and pipeline, diversion of water, and application to beneficial use. For conditional appropriation, by formation of requisite intent to appropriate coupled with actions manifesting such an intent sufficient to put third parties on notice, including, but not limited to site investigations and water supply planning by water resources consultants, and filing of subject Application. d. Date water applied to beneficial use: April 30, 1989 for absolute appropriation; N/A for conditional appropriation. e. Amount claimed: 0.25 c.f.s., absolute for irrigation; 0.25 c.f.s. conditional for recreation (to fill a hot tub), fire protection (via storage in Silverman Augmentation Tank), and to fill and refill the Silverman Augmentation Tank for the purposes described in Paragraph 6.e, above (Applicants claim a total diversion rate of 0.25 c.f.s. from this structure for all described uses). f. Use or proposed use: District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 5 of 18 i) Fire protection, recreation, and to fill and refill the Silverman Augmentation Tank. ii) Irrigation of up to a total of approximately 1.25 acres located in the SE'/< NW'/ SE'/< of Section 14, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6th P.M. See Exhibit A. g. Remarks: although irrigation diversions from this structure shall be at a maximum rate of 0.25 c.f.s., total diversions shall not exceed an average rate of 0.031 c.f.s. per day. 8. Silverman Spring: a. Legal description: The collection structure is located in the NE'/< of the SE'/ of Section 14, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6th P.M., at a point approximately 1,070 feet from the East section line and 1,575 feet from the South section line. The spring source is located in the NE'/. of the SE!/4 of Section 14, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6th P.M., at a point approximately 960 feet from the East section line and 1,500 feet from the South section line. See Exhibit A. b. Source: spring tributary to Snowmass Creek, tributary to Roaring Fork River, tributary to Colorado River. Appropriation information: i) Date of initiation of appropriation: October 14, 1986 for irrigation, fire protection, and recreation; December 27, 2007 for fill and refill of the Silverman Augmentation Tank. ii) How appropriation was initiated: For absolute appropriation, by construction of collection system, diversion of water, and application to beneficial use for irrigation, fire protection, and recreation purposes; for conditional appropriation, by formation of requisite intent to appropriate coupled with actions manifesting such an intent sufficient to put third parties on notice, including, but not limited to site investigations and water supply planning by water resources consultants, and filing of subject Application. d. Date water applied to beneficial use: October 14, 1986 for absolute appropriation; N/A for conditional appropriation. District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 6 of 18 e. Amount claimed: 0.033 c.f.s. (15 g.p.m.), absolute for irrigation, recreation (including without limitation to fill and refill a hot tub), and fire protection; conditional for fill and refill of the Silverman Augmentation Tank. f. Use or proposed use: i) Recreation, fire protection and to fill and refill the Silverman Augmentation Tank. ii) Irrigation of approximately 0.55 acres located in the SE % NW'/ SE'/ of Section 14, Township 9 South, Range 86 west of the 6th P.M. (these lands are part of the 1.25 acres described above in Paragraph 7.f.ii) g. Remarks: The Silverman Spring is a surface diversion which presently consists of a vertical concrete pipe with a debris screen that collects water flowing on the ground surface. THIRD CLAIM: ABSOLUTE UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHT 9. Silverman Well: a. Legal description: The well is located in the NW'/< of the SE'/ of Section 14, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6th P.M., at a point approximately 1,560 feet from the East section line and 1,725 feet from the South section line. See Exhibit A. i) Source: Groundwater tributary to Snowmass Creek, tributary to Roaring Fork River, tributary to Colorado River. b. Appropriation information: i) Date of initiation of appropriation: November 13, 1979. ii) How appropriation was initiated: by original permitting of well (permit no. 111566), construction of well, installation of pump, diversion of water, and application to beneficial use. The well is currently permitted as No. 275581 pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-90-137, and the Applicants request a confirmation of the exempt status of this structure pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-602(3). District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 7 of 18 C. Date water applied to beneficial use: On or before December 31, 1979. d. Amount claimed: 10.0 g.p.m., absolute. C. Use: ordinary household purposes within one single family dwelling and fire protection. 10. Map: A map generally depicting the location of the above-described Silverman water rights is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein. FOURTH CLAIM: APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION, INCLUDING CONDITIONAL APPROPRIATIVE RIGHTS OF EXCHANGE 11. Water rights to be augmented: Silverman Spring and Silverman Pump and Pipeline. 12. Water rights to be used for augmentation: Silverman Augmentation Tank and any of the following water rights made available pursuant to Applicants' contract with the Basalt Water Conservancy District ("BWCD") in an amount of at least 1.8 acre-feet per year: a. Green Mountain Reservoir. b. Ruedi Reservoir. C. Troy Ditch and Edith Ditch. d. Robinson Ditch. 13. Information from previous decree for Green Mountain Reservoir: a. Legal description: located approximately 16 miles southeast of the Town of Kremmling in Summit County, Colorado, and more particularly in all or parts of Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 24 of Township 2 South, Range 80 West, and in Sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, and 34, Township 2 South, Range 79 West of the 6th P.M. b. Source: Blue River, tributary of Colorado River. C. Adjudication Date: October 12, 1955. d. Appropriation Date: August 1, 1935. District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 8 of 18 e. Case Nos.: 2782, 5016, and 5017, United States District Court, District of Colorado. f. Decreed Amount: 154,645 acre feet. g. Decreed Uses: in accordance with Paragraphs 5(a), (b), and (c) of the section entitled "Manner of Operation of Project Facilities and Auxiliary Facilities" in Senate Document 80. 14. Information from previous decree for Ruedi Reservoir: a. Legal description: an on -channel reservoir located in Sections 7, 8, 9, 11, and 14 throughl8, Township 8 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M. The reservoir is located in portions of Eagle and Pitkin Counties. b. Source: Frying Pan River, tributary of Colorado River. C. Adjudication Date: June 20, 1958. d. Appropriation Date: July 29, 1957. C. Case No.: C.A. 4613, Garfield County District Court. f. Decreed Amount: 102,369 acre feet (Originally decreed for 140,697.3 acre feet; reduced to 102,369 acre feet in Case No. W-789-76). By decree of the Water Court in Case No. 81 CW34, Ruedi Reservoir was decreed a refill right in the amount of 101,280 acre feet, conditional. In Water Court Case No. 95CW95, 44,509 acre feet was made absolute. g. Decreed Uses: generation of electric energy, domestic, municipal, industrial, irrigation and stock watering. 15. Information from previous decrees for Troy Ditch and Edith Ditch rights: STRUCTURE PRIORITY COURT ADI APP DECREED USE AMOUNT SOLD, TRANSFERRED OR RESERVED AMOUNT CASE DATE DATE AMOUNT REMAINING 10 NO. (C. F. S.) (4) S 6 7 8 9 C.F.& AF Troy Ditch 1 370 3082 08/25/1936 05/01/1906 5,10 1 0.000 0.000 0.095 0.064 0.035 4.906 N/A Troy Ditch 427 3082 08/25/1936 05/01/1928 10.80 1 0.000 0.000 0.200 0.134 0.073 t0.393 N/A Ist Enl Troy Ditch 669 4613 06/20/1958 06/01/1942 6.20 1 0.000 0.000 01115 0.077 0.042 5.966 N/A 2nd Eni Edith Ditch 353 1 3082 08/25/1936 1 05/01/1904 1 2.72 1 I 1 0.110 0.1320 0.050 0.000 0.018 2.410 NIA Edith Ditch 673 4613 06/20/1958 07/01/1946 3.23 1 0.000 0.000 0.060 0.000 0.022 3.148NIA 1st Enl 1 1 District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 9 of 18 Troy Ditch Water System (2)W-2281 AMOUNT ADI:. DATE APP. DATE.:. 15.50(3) I,D,M 0.110 0.1320 0.520 0.275 14.273 412.89 aka Lower C.f.s. DISTRICT C P I 1 c.f.s. 1 1 1-0.190 Head gate 5.00 1.21 05/11/1889 06/15/1882 38 DITCH 132 (1) Originally diverted from Miller Creek. All others originally diverted from Frying Pan River. (2) Alternate point for all priorities of Troy and Edith Ditches. (3) Combined amount limited to 15.5 c.f.s. and 453 AF of consumptive use, 300 AF of which can be stored. (4) I = Irrigation, D = Domestic, M = Municipal, C = Industrial and P = Piscatorial. (5) Transferred to Edith Ditch Well in Case No. 80CW1 with 1.0 AF. (6) Transferred to three springs on Cap K Ranch in Case No. 82CW189 (1.29 AF assumed to be included). (7) Deeded to George Yates with 15.4 AF in 1983. 0.2 c.f.s. and 10.60 c.f.s. was included in Case No. 82CW357 for Ruedi South Shores plan for augmentation. (8) Deeded to Joan Wheeler in 1987 for diversion at the Troy Ditch 1 st and 2nd Enlargement (16.9 AF assumed to be included). (9) Reserved for augmentation of Cap K Ponds with 5.52 AF. Case No. 91 CW220. (10) A total of 40.11 AF of the original 453.00 AF has been sold or transferred. In. Case No. W-2281, Division 5, the Court decreed that 453 acre feet of annual consumptive -use credits were available to these ditches, and that 300 acre feet could be stored in an unnamed reservoir. The District owns 412.89 acre feet of the 453 acre feet, and makes the water rights available to contract allottees for use pursuant to an approved substitute supply plan or decree of Court. The Troy and Edith augmentation water can be delivered to the Frying Pan, Roaring Fork or Colorado Rivers by by-passing water at the headgate on the Frying Pan River, 16. Information from previous decrees for Robinson Ditch rights: STRUCTURE DECREED AMOUNT ADI:. DATE APP. DATE.:. PRIORITY CASE AMOUNT/ .. OWNED BY :. NO. (2) C.f.s. DISTRICT c.f.s. 1 ROBINSON 5.00 1.21 05/11/1889 06/15/1882 38 DITCH 132 ROBINSON 2.50 0.60 05/11/1889 04/15/1886 140 DITCH I 1 1 132 District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Cou Page 10 of 18 ROBINSON 2.00 0.48 05/11/1889 11/15/1886 167 DITCH 132 ROBINSON 10.70 2.59 12/29/1903 04/25/1899 212C DITCH 1061 ROBINSON 20.06 4.85 08/25/1936 04/25/1900 326 DITCH 3082 (1) The District owns 441 shares of Class 1 stock issued by the Robinson Ditch Company. The said 441 shares equal 24.16% of the total shares and are associated with 9.73 c.f.s. of the 40.26 c.f.s. decreed to the Robinson Ditch. (2) District Court in and for Garfield County. (3) Legal Description of Point of Diversion: The point of diversion as decreed is located on the North bank of the Roaring Fork River one-half mile below the mouth of Sopris Creek in Section 11, T. 8 S., R. 87 West, 6th P.M. (4) Historic Use: Irrigation of approximately 137.2 acres of hay and pasture under BWCD's interest in the Robinson Ditch water rights. In Case No. 93CW319, the Court decreed that 360 acre feet of annual consumptive -use credits are associated with said irrigation. In that case, the Court also decreed a change of use of BWCD's Robinson Ditch rights to include augmentation. BWCD makes the credits available to contract allottees for use pursuant to an approved substitute supply plan or decree of Court. 17. Statement of plan for augmentation: The purpose of this plan for augmentation is to provide replacement water for out -of -priority depletions resulting from irrigation of up to approximately 1.25 acres (including both up to 0.55 acres of lawns/gardens and 0.7 acres of pasture) within Applicants' property and evaporation from a hot tub and other water features with a cumulative surface area not to exceed 175 square feet (0.004 acre). The projected annual diversion requirements for these uses is approximately 2.48 acre feet. The projected annual depletion from these uses is approximately 1.99 acre feet. The monthly water diversion and depletion required are set forth in Exhibit B hereto and incorporated herein. The evaporation table is Exhibit C hereto and incorporated herein. Out -of -priority depletions will be replaced in time, place and amount by contract water made available from the District and, if necessary, releases from the on-site Silverman Augmentation Tank directly into Snowmass Creek via a pipe. Delivery of the contract water will require operation of the exchange set forth in greater detail below. If on-site water augmentation water is not available from the Silverman Augmentation Tank during the Division Engineer's administration of a senior call the exchange is out - of -priority and on-site augmentation water is not available, then Applicants shall immediately curtail all use of the Silverman Augmentation Tank, Silverman Pump and Pipeline and the Silverman Spring, which includes not refilling the hot tub during the District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 11 of 18 call period. Projected augmentation scenarios are set forth in Exhibits D and E hereto and incorporated herein. Augmentation replacement is required, however, only in the event of administration of a call against the Silverman Augmentation Tank, Silverman Spring or Silverman Pump and Pipeline. Applicants reserve the right to contract for additional augmentation water if necessary for operation of this plan for augmentation. 18. Annropriative Rights of Exchange: Augmentation of the Silverman Pump and Pipeline and Silverman Spring using water rights available by contract with the District will be accomplished by exercise of a right of exchange, for which Applicants claim a conditional right of exchange described as follows: a. Lower terminus of exchange reach: The confluence of the Roaring Fork River and the Colorado River located in the SEI/4 of the NW'/< of Section 9, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th P.M., at a point approximately 2,200 feet from the North section line and 2,350 feet from the West section line. b. Upper terminus of exchange reach: The Silverman Pump and Pipeline and Silverman Spring located as described herein. C. Amount claimed: 0.01 c.f.s., conditional, equal to the average daily depletion rate in the peak month. d. Appropriation information: i) Date of initiation of appropriation: December 27, 2007. ii) How appropriation was initiated: by formation of requisite intent to appropriate coupled with actions manifesting such an intent sufficient to put third parties on notice, including, but not limited to site investigations and water supply planning by water resources consultants, and filing of subject Application. iii) Date water applied to beneficial use by exchange: N/A. e. Remarks: Should this appropriative right of exchange ever be out -of priority, any out -of -priority water uses pursuant to the above-described plan for augmentation shall be immediately curtailed to the extent that resulting out -of -priority depletions are not replaced in time, location and amount by releases from the Silverman Augmentation Tank. 19. Non -injury: Operation of the subject plan for augmentation, including exchange, will not result in injury to any other vested or decreed conditional water rights. District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 12 of 18 20. Water quality: The water to be provided for augmentation is of a quality and quantity so as to meet the requirements for which the water has been used by senior downstream appropriators, and therefore meets the requirements of C.R.S. § 37-92- 305(5). 21. Integrated water system: The Applicants claim that the subject water rights are part of an integrated water system due to the inter -relationship between the individual rights and the water supply for the Applicants' property as a whole. The Silverman Augmentation Tank is the basis, in part, for providing a legal water supply to replace out -of -priority depletions to Snowmass Creek. The Silverman Pump and Pipeline supplies water from Snowmass Creek to fill the Silverman Augmentation tank and a hot tub, to provide fire protection, and to irrigate the lower pasture area. The Silverman Spring supplies water to fill the Silverman Augmentation Tank, a hot tub and underground fire storage tanks, and to irrigate the lawn, shrubs, trees, and flower beds around the house. The Silverman Well supplies in-house uses on the property. As described above, these water rights collectively are the water supply system for the property. Therefore, the Referee finds that the subject water rights are part of an integrated water system. When a project or integrated system is comprised of several features, work on one feature of the project or system shall be considered in finding that reasonable diligence has been shown in the development of water rights of the entire project or system." C.R.S. § 37-92-301(4)(b). 22. Property ownership: Owner of land upon which any new diversion or storage structure or modification to any existing diversion or storage structure will be constructed: Applicants. II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 23. The foregoing findings of fact are fully incorporated herein. 24. All notices required by law have been properly made, including as required under C.R.S. § 37-92-302(2) and (3). The Court has jurisdiction over the Application and over all persons or entities who had standing to appear, even though they did not do SO. 25. The Application is complete, covering all applicable matters required pursuant to the Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969, C.R.S. §§ 37-92-101 through -602. 26. Applicants have fulfilled all legal requirements for a decree for the requested water rights, including C.R.S. §§ 37-92-302 and 37-92-305. District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 13 of 18 27. Applicants have fulfilled all legal requirements for a decree for the requested plan for augmentation, including exchange, including C.R.S. §§ 37-92-302 and 37-92- 305. 28. Pursuant to C.R.S. §§ 37-90-103(21)(b) and 37-92-103(14)(b), improvements made to a spring are not considered to be a "well" where the natural spring discharge is captured or concentrated by installation of a near surface structure or device less than ten feet in depth located at or within 50 feet of the spring's natural discharge point and the water is conveyed directly by gravity flow or into a separate sump or storage, if the owner obtains a water right for such structure or device as a spring pursuant to Title 38, Article 92 of the Colorado Revised Statutes. The Referee concludes that the improvements to the Silverman Spring, as described in Paragraph 8.g, constitute a near surface structure, as set forth in C.R.S. §§ 37-90-103(21)(b) and 37-92-103(14)(b). 29. Pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-305(8), the plan for augmentation, including conditional appropriative rights of exchange, is sufficient to permit the continuation of diversions when curtailment would otherwise be required to meet a valid senior call for water, to the extent that Applicants provide adequate replacement water necessary to meet the lawful requirements of a senior diverter at the time and location and to the extent that the senior would be deprived of his or her lawful entitlement by the Applicants' diversion. 30. The Court hereby concludes the Applicants have established that water can and will be diverted under the subject conditional water rights and will be beneficially used, and that this water supply project can and will be completed with diligence and within a reasonable time. 31. The conditional water rights decreed herein are individual components of Applicants' integrated water supply system. Consequently, in subsequent diligence proceedings, work on any one feature of Applicants' supply system shall be considered in finding that reasonable diligence has been shown in the development of water rights for all features of Applicants' water supply system, see C.R.S. § 37-92-301(4)(b). 32. If operated in accordance with the terms and conditions of this decree, the plan for augmentation, including exchange, described herein will prevent injury to senior vested or decreed conditional water rights. a District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 14 of 18 III. JUDGMENT AND DECREE 33. The foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law are fully incorporated herein. 34. The Court hereby confirms and decrees water rights to the Silverman Augmentation Tank, Silverman Pump and Pipeline, Silverman Spring and Silverman Well, as more fully described herein. 35. The Court hereby confirms and decrees the conditional appropriative right of exchange described herein. The Applicants shall give adequate notice to the Division Engineer prior to operating the exchange approved herein. 36. The Court hereby decrees and approves the plan for augmentation, including exchange, described herein. Applicants' plan for augmentation is sufficient to permit the continuation of diversions when curtailment would otherwise be required to meet a valid senior call for water, to the extent that the Applicants shall provide replacement water necessary to meet the lawful requirements of a senior diverter at the time and location and to the extent the senior would be deprived of his or her lawful entitlement by the Applicants' diversions. 37. The transit losses associated with replacement releases in this decree are estimates for the purpose of establishing that the plan can operate and will prevent injury. Actual transit losses may be modified pursuant to C.R.S. §§ 37-80-102(7) and 37-83-104 as determined to be necessary by the Division Engineer. 38. Pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-305(8), the State Engineer shall curtail all out -of - priority diversions, the depletions from which are not so replaced as to prevent injury to vested water rights. 39. Applicants shall install measuring devices, provide accounting and supply calculations regarding the timing of depletions as required by the Division Engineer for the operation of this plan for augmentation. Applicants shall file an annual report with the Division Engineer by November 15 of each year summarizing diversions and replacements made under this plan each preceding irrigation year (November l -October 31). 40. Applicants acknowledge that the CWCB holds the following instream flow water rights to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree, which rights were appropriated prior to the filing of the application in this Case No. 07CW230: District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 15 of 18 Case No. Stream Amount Approp. Watershed County (all in (c.f.s.) Date Div.S 76CW2943A Snowmass 12.0 (04/01— 1/14/1976 Roaring Fork Pitkin Creek 10/15);4 River multi -stage flows (10/16 - 03/31 76CW2943B Snowmass 12.0 (04/01- 1/14/1976 Roaring Fork Pitkin Creek 10/15); 11.0 River (10/16-03/31 92CW280 m Snowass 3.0 (04/01- 9/15/1992 Roaring Fork Pitkin Creek 10/15) River 92CW281 Snowmass 10.5 (04/01- 9/15/1992 Roaring Fork Pitkin Creek 10/15) River 85CW646 Roaring Fork 55.0 (04/01- 11/8/1985 Roaring Fork Pitkin/Eagle River 10/15); 30.0 River (10/01-03/31) 85CW639 Roaring Fork 145.0 (04/01- 11/8/1985 Roaring Fork Pitkin/Eagle River 09/30); 75.0 River ' 10/01-03/31 However, some of the Applicant's claimed uses of water were in existence at the time of the CWCB's appropriation of the instream flow water rights on Snowmass Creek as decreed in Case: Nos. 92CW280 and 92CW281. Specifically, 0.25 c.f.s. from the Silverman Pump and Pipeline was diverted to irrigate up to 1.25 acres, and 15 g.p.m. from the Silverman Spring was diverted for irrigation of up to 1.25 acres, fire protection and recreation. 41. C.R.S. § 37-92-102(3)(b) provides that instream flow water rights appropriated by the CWCB shall be "subject to the present uses or exchanges of water being made by other water users pursuant to appropriation or practices in existence on the date of such appropriation, whether or not previously confirmed by court order or decree." Consequently, the CWCB's Snowmass Creek instream flow rights decreed in Case Nos. 92CW280 and 92CW281 shall be subject to the above referenced pre-existing uses pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-102(3)(b). 42. Except as provided above, the CWCB's Snowmass Creek instream flow rights decreed in Case Nos. 92CW280 and 92CW291 shall be administered as having been filed in 1992 and shall be administered according to the prior appropriation system. As between all rights filed in the same calendar year, priorities shall be determined by historical date of appropriation and not affect by the date of entry of ruling. District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 16 of 18 43. Except as provided above, the application of C.R.S. § 37-92-102(3)(b) shall not result in general subordination of the Snowmass Creek instream flow water rights, as decreed in Case Nos. 92CW280 and 92CW291, to any other junior water right. 44. In consideration of the specific findings and conclusions made herein, and in conformance with C.R.S. § 37-92-304(6) (1990), as amended, the water rights and plan for augmentation decreed herein shall be subject to reconsideration by the Water Judge on the question of injury to the vested water rights of others for a period extending from the date that this decree enters until five (5) years after the Applicants have provided written notice to the parties, the Division Engineer and the Court that the above- described plan for augmentation has become operational. The plan shall be deemed to be operational when water has been diverted and used for decreed augmented uses, when the Silverman Augmentation Tank is installed along with a means to measure and release water to Snowmass Creek, and a valid BWCD is in place. If no petition for reconsideration is filed within said five (5) years, retention of jurisdiction for this purpose shall automatically expire. Any party who wants the Court to reconsider the question of injury must file a verified petition with the Court, setting forth the facts that cause such injury and explaining the claimed injury. The party filing the petition shall have the burden of going forward to establish the prima facie facts alleged in the petition. If the Court finds those facts to be established, the Applicants shall thereupon bear the burden of proof to show (a) that any modification sought by the Applicants will avoid injury to other water rights, or (b) that any modification sought by the petitioner is not required to avoid injury to other water rights, or (c) that any term or condition proposed by Applicants in response to the petition does avoid injury to other water rights. 45. The conditional water rights and appropriative right of exchange decreed herein shall be in full force and effect until six years from the date that the Water Judge signs the order. If the Applicants wish to maintain the conditional water rights thereafter they shall file an application for a finding of reasonable diligence on or before that date, or make a showing on or before then that the conditional water rights have become absolute water rights by reason of the completion of these appropriations. 46. Stipulation with the Colorado Water Conservation Board. Applicants and the CWCB entered into a Stipulation, dated September 3, 2010, intended as a compromise and settlement of this litigation between said parties. However, because the issues decided herein have not been litigated, neither Applicants nor the CWCB shall be collaterally estopped, by reason of this Ruling and Decree, from asserting any factual and legal issues in any other cases not involving these water rights. This Ruling and Decree shall not be used, considered, or cited as precedent in any other case except and only to the extent that the rights as decreed herein are at issue. District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 17 of 18 47. Transfer of Ownership of Conditional Water Rights. Pursuant to Rule 9 of the Uniform Local Rules for All State Water Court Divisions, upon the sale or other transfer of the conditional water rights decreed herein, the transferee shall file with the Division 5 Water Court a notice of transfer which shall state: A. The title and case number of this Case No. 07CW230; B. The description of the conditional water right transferred; C. The name of the transferor; D. The name and mailing address of the transferee; and E. A copy of the recorded deed. The owner of said conditional water rights shall also notify the Clerk of the Division 5 Water Court of any change in mailing address. The Clerk shall place any notice of transfer or change of address in the case file of this Case No. 07CW230 and in the case file (if any) in which the Court first made a finding of reasonable diligence. It is accordingly ordered that this ruling of Referee and judgment and decree shall be filed with the Water Clerk and shall become effective upon such filing, subject to judicial review pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-304, as amended. It is further ordered that a copy of this ruling of Referee and judgment and decree shall be filed with the State Engineer and the Division Engineer for Water Division No. 5, DATED: Det o n , 2010. BY THE REFEREE: Kstm'd iz L 4 Hon. Holly Kirsner Strablizky, ater Referee Water Division No. 5 State of Colorado District Court, Water Division No. 5 Case No. 07CW230: Applicants: Michael and Yvonne Silverman Findings of Fact, Ruling of Referee, and Judgment and Decree of Water Court Page 18 of 18 No protest was filed in this matter. The foregoing Ruling of the Referee is confirmed and approved, and is made the Judgment and Decree of this Court. DONE this day of , 2010. BY THE COURT: Hon. James B. Boyd, Water Judge Water Division No. 5 It C W Court: CO Garfield County District Court 9th JD Judge: Holly Kirsner Strablizky File & Serve Transaction ID: 34820177 Current Date: Jan 16, 2011 Case Number: 2007CW230 Case Name: In the interest of. SILVERMAN, MICHAEL et al Court Authorizer Comments: Any request for a further finding of reasonable diligence shall be filed in January 2017. Exhibits A-E as filed simultaneously the Referee's ruling are incorporated as fmdingings in this Decree. /s/ Judge James B Boyd ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION OF TI -IE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, APPROVING THE SILVERMAN SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative Decision No.71-2009 RECITALS I ) Yvonne and Michael Silverman (hereafter "Applicant") have applied to the Community Development Director of Pitkin County (hereafter "Director") to obtain Site Plan review approval to replace the existing residence. 2) The property is located at 5720 Snowmass Creek Road, and described as Lot 1, Hidden Meadows Subdivision. 3) The lot contains 5.2 acres and is nonconforming in size within the RS -30 zone district. 4) The Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC") granted subdivision exemption approval for the Hidden Meadows Subdivision in 1977; the plat is recorded in Plat Book 6 at Pages 40-41. The plat includes a note that reads, "Buildings located on Lots I, 2 and 3 shall be located on Terrace 111." The property is improved with a single family residence originally built in 1980; the house is built predominantly on Terrace 11. 5) The Community Development Director approved an activity envelope and a minor plat amendment to allow redevelopment on Terrace 11 of the lot, pursuant to Administrative Decision No. 80-2008. The Activity Envelope Plan and Minor Plat Amendment have not yet been recorded. 6) The Snowmass/Capitol Creek Caucus supports the application. 7) The Director finds that the request complies with the applicable provisions of the Code. The lot is within the mapped Scenic View Protection Area, but the proposed development will only be minimally visible from Snowmass Creek Road, given the preservation of the dense trees between the road and the structures, and otherwise complies with the standards of Sec. 7-20-120 of the Code. 8) The Director finds that the landscape plan complies with the requirements of the Code and is consistent with the wildfire mitigation standards. APPROVED by the Director, subject to the following conditions, which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: I . The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the application and shall consider those representations to be conditions of approval, unless amended by other conditions. 2. All conditions of Administrative Decision No. 80-2008 shall remain in full force and effect, except as amended herein. 3. Prior to submission of any future building permit applications, the Applicant shall be required to submit the following for approval by the County Attorney and Community Development and recordation: an Amended Plat for Lot I and an Activity Envelope/Site Plan, in accordance with Land Use Code Section 2-30-20(8)(2) and (5) and Application Manual Sections 2.1.12 and 2.3.7. 'file above referenced approvals shall be a condition precedent to finalization and recordation of these RECEPTION#: 563110, 09/25/2009 at 11:43:48 AM, i Of 3. R $0.00 Doc Code ADMIN DECISION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Administrative Decision No. i .I-2009 Pulte 2 documents. The Activity Envelope/Site Plan shall reference this Administrative Decision and Administrative Decision No. 80-2008. 4, The Applicant shall comply with all standards for development within Scenic View Protection Areas as represented in the application and approved in this Decision. The exterior of the residence shall utilize indigenous earth tone materials or colors and the roofs shall have a non -reflective color or composition. Reflective roof materials shall not be used unless the materials are treated prior to installation to eliminate reflection, with the exception of materials associated with solar or photovoltaic equipment. Driveway lighting is prohibited and all other lighting shall comply with the lighting code. 5. Each tree with 6 inches or larger DBH that is removed shall be replaced with one or more trees with total DBH at least equal to the caliper of the tree(s) removed, with the exception of diseased trees or trees required to be removed to comply with the wildfire mitigation requirements. 5. Replace condition #6 of Administrative Decision No. 80-2008 with the following: The Applicant shall comply with the following standards for development in a medium wildfire hazard area: The area within 15 feet of the house and the furthermost projection of combustible construction of the house should be comprised primarily of noncombustible hardscape surfaces. Woody vegetation shall not be planted within this area. Firewood or other combustible materials including Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) should not be stored within this area. Some trees or small clusters of trees or shrubs may be maintained or planted in the vicinity of the house, if the 15 foot area is extended outward from the furthest growth expected from the trees and shrubs when mature. Crowns of vegetation within these clusters should be at least 10 feet from any portion of the buildings. Limbs oftrees within these clusters should be pruned to one halfthe height ofthe tree, one third the height for conifer, or 10 feet, whichever is less. Maintain natural grass at less than 6 inches within 30 feet of the house. Limbs of all trees within 30 feet should be pruned to one half the height of the tree, one third for conifer, or 10 feet, whichever is less. No brush or shrubs which when mature will be tall enough to act as ladder fuel should be provided or maintained around the trees. Trees and brush should be clustered. These clusters of brush or trees should be separated from each other by a distance of 2Y times the height of the mature vegetation. The diameter of the cluster should be limited to 2'/ times the height of the mature vegetation. The plant material growing between trees and clusters of bushes or trees should be grass maintained at 6 inches or less. Thin and remove lower branches of brush or shrubs within clusters of individual plants to eliminate ladder fuels. Cut shrubs shall be treated with Garlon or an equivalent herbicide to prevent sprouting. Cut materials should be either removed or chipped and spread. For a distance of 100 feet from the house, or to the property line, remove all standing dead and deadfall. Cut and collected materials should be removed or chipped and spread. Prior to issuance of'a building permit application f'or the new residence, the Applicant shall obtain an Access Permit for driveway improvements. Grasscrete may be utilized for the fire truck turnaround, as long as the grasscrete is maintained through the winter and is designed to accommodate a load capacity of 40,000 pounds. The Applicant shall submit specifications for the grasscrete product to the Snowmass-Wildcat Fire Protection District for review prior to issuance of the access permit to ensure that the product is rated by the manufacturer f'or a 40,000 pound load. the Applicant shall apply for and obtain a Floodplain Development Permit if the pedestrian bridge across Snowmass Creek is to be improved or modified. Arlmini irutive Decision No. -�62009 page 3 9. No calculations for height, bulk, setback, size, floor area, or any other building and zoning requirements have been conducted. These requirements will be considered at the time of building permit. Any structures represented in the application may not be permitted under building and zoning regulations. 10. Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this approval, or any subsequent permit(s) or approval(s) related to this property, or vested rights associated with this property. 11. Statutory vested rights for the approval contained herein are granted pursuant to the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Colorado Statutes, subject to the exceptions set forth in Pitkin County Land Use Code, § 2-20-170 and C.R.S., § 24-68-105. The statutory vested rights granted herein shall expire on 2012. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES WEEKLY on the 21" day of June, 2009. APPROVED by the Director, this'�titl day of t; , 2009. PUBLISHED AFTER ADOPTION FOR VESTED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS in the Aspen Times Weekly on the I I day of.(),, -_, 2009. Cind n, Community Development Director PID4264514401001 P059-09 r RECEPTION#: 552302, 08/26/2008 at 09:48:08 AM, ----- 1 or 5. R $0.00 Doc Code ADMIN DECISION Janice K. Vas Caudill, Pitkin County, CO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D1RECrOR OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, APPROVING THE SILVERMAN ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND MINOR PLAT AMENDMENT Administrative Decision No.&).2008 RECITALS I . Michael and Yvonne Silverman ("Applicant") have applied to the Community Development Director of Pitkin County ("Director") to establish an activity envelope around the existing house and associated development to accommodate construction of a new residence. In addition, the Applicant proposes to amend the recorded plat to allow redevelopment on Terrace 11 of the tot. 2. The lot contains 5.2 acres and is nonconforming in size within the RS -30 zone district. 3. The lot is located at 5720 Snowmass Creek Road, and is described as Lot 1, Hidden Meadows Subdivision. 4 The Board of County Commissioners (" SOCC") granted subdivision exemption approval for the Hidden Meadows Subdivision in 1977; the plat is recorded in Plat Book 6 at Pages 40-4 t. The plat includes a note that reads, "Buildings located on Lots 1, 2 and 3 shall be located on Terrace Ill." The property is improved with a single family residence originally built in 1980; the house is built predominantly on Terrace Il. 5. The lot is exempt from Growth Management up to 5,7 50square feet, pursuant to Land Use Code Sec. 6- 30-100(b). E. The Director finds that the proposed activity envelope is consistent with the applicable requirements of the Code, as follows: A. The activity envelopes are located more than 100' from the high water line of Snowmass Creek, with the exception of a small activity envelope around the existing well, which is approximately 75' from the high water line. B. The activity envelope primarily contains slopes of less than 30%, and the areas of slopes in excess of 30% qualify as minor slope anomalies pursuant to Sec. 7-20-20(c)(3) of the Code. C. The wildfire hazard is rated as low, and can be mitigated pursuant to the provisions of Sec. 7-20- 60(c) of the Code. D. Replacement of the residence will not create any additional impacts on wildlife habitat areas. E. The property is not impacted by any geologic hazards. 7. The Director further finds that it is appropriate to amend the plat to allow construction of a new residence on Terrace ll since this portion of the lot is not affected by potential geologic hazards. Both a 1974 Chen and Associates, Inc. report and a 2008 Yoh and Associates, Inc. report assert that Terrace II is suitable for development and avoids geologic hazards. APPROVED by the Director, subject to the following conditions, which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: 1. The Applicants shall adhere to all material representations made during the application process. AcImmisrrurive Decision No.'M -1008 Page 2 2. Prior to submission of any building or other development permit applications to redevelop the existing residence, the Applicant shall be required to submit for approval an application for Site Plan Review, pursuant to Secs. 2-30-20 and 7-10-50 of the Code. The Site Plan Review application shall address the following, in addition to the other requirements specified above: A. Demonstrate compliance with the standards in Sec. 7.20-120.d for development within the Scenic View Protection Area and the rural character guidelines for building location in Sec. 7-20-120.c of the Code. B. Demonstrate that the site can accommodate an on-site wastewater treatment system (O WTS) that complies with the then current OWTS regulations. 3. Prior to submission of the Site Plan Review application, the Applicant shall be required to submit for approval by the County Attorney and Community Development an amended Plat and Activity Envelope Plan in accordance with Land Use Code Section 2-30-20(gx3) and (5) and Application Manual Sections 2. 1.1 and . The above referenced approvals shall be a condition precedent to finalization and recordation. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit application for the new residence, the Applicant shall: A. Provide proof of an adequate water supply (in terms of quantity and availability) for domestic and fire protection purposes, and for irrigation purposes, if applicable, to the Environmental Health and Natural Resources Department. B. Complete a fireplace/woodstove registration form with the Community Development Department, if necessary. C. Submit a drainage and erosion control plan for review and approval by the Planning Engineer. If site disturbance exceeds one ( I ) acre, the Applicant shall obtain a St(-mwater permit from the State of Colorado. D. Submit a construction management plan for review and approval by the Planning Engineer. E. Pay the applicable road and employee housing impact fees. F. Obtain a permit from Environmental Health and Natural Resources for the new on-site wastewater disposal system. G. Submit a detailed revegetation plan for disturbed areas with appropriate seed mixes. The plan shall specify the native seed mix to be used, the rate at which it will be applied and the method of cover. 5. No structural development in excess of 30" above or below natural grade shall occur within the setbacks of the lot, with the exception of driveways and associated retaining walls of up to 6' above or below natural grade and fencing. Landscaping in the form of berms shall not exceed four feet from the most restrictive grade. Any development located within setbacks mandated by County zoning regulations that does not comply with these restrictions shall require a variance from the Board of Adjustment. Approval of an activity envelope within such setbacks does not assure approval of a variance. 6. The Applicant shall comply with the following standards for Development in a Low Wildfire Hazard Area: A. Defensible Space: The area around all buildings/structures, limited by property boundaries that may limit a property owner's ability to comply with this section, shall incorporate landscaping with wildfire delensible space considerations as follows (note actual vegetation manipulation to o — Adminisrrorive Decision Nu' SG -2008 Page 3 meet these conditions may not be necessary where the natural vegetation patterns have already fulfilled these conditions): 1) Brush, debris and non -ornamental vegetation shall be removed within a minimum ten -foot (10') perimeter around all structures. 2) Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the vertical and horiutntal continuity of the fuels at a minimum of a thirty (30) foot perimeter around a structure built on flat ground. (For greater slopes, reference the CSFS Safety Zone chart in Wildfire Guidelines For Rural Homeowners, which provides general guidelines that may be modified by a wildfire expert acceptable to the County). 3) Spacing between clumps of brush and vegetation up to the thirty (30) foot perimeter shall be a minimum of two (2) times the height of the fuel. Maximum diameter of the clumps shall be equal to the height of the fuel. All measurements shall be from the edges of the crowns of the fue I. 4) All branches from trees and brush within the thirty (30) foot perimeter shall be pruned to a height often (10) feet above the ground with removal of ladder fuels from around trees and brush. 5) Tree crown separation within the thirty (30) foot perimeters shall have a minimum often (10) feet between the edges of the crowns, except for mature stands of aspen trees where ladder fuels have been removed. In areas of aspen regeneration, understory shrubs and down and dead materials shall be removed. 6) All branches that extend over the roof eaves shall be trimmed and all branches within fifteen (15) feet of chimneys shall be removed. 7) The density of fuels up to a one hundred (100) foot perimeter of the structures shall be reduced where natural reduction has not already occurred. 8) All deadfall up to a one hundred (100) foot perimeter shall be removed. 9) No new conifer trees shall be planted within ten (10) feet of a residence. 10) No flammable mulches shall be placed within two (2) feet of a residence. Roofing Materials: Class A covering or Class A assembly as defined by the currently adopted Building Code. No wood shakes or shingles. Alf other adopted Building Code compliant methods and materials permitted. Roofs with less than a 3:12 pitch are not permitted unless they comply with the following: 1) All roof coverings shall be constructed of non-combustible materials and installed on a Class A roofassembly. 2) All roof coverings shall have a surface that shall facilitate the natural process of clearing roof debris. 3) Protrusions above the rooftine, such as parapets, shall be prohibited. 4) Roofs shall be installed as required by the adopted Building Code and shall have a minimum pitch of 1:48. 5) All roof designs, coverings, or equivalent assemblies shall be specifically approved by the Fire Marshal prior to submittal of a building permit application. t Administrative Decision NaF J -2008 /'axe 4 C. Maintenance and Miscellaneous Requirements 1) Roofs and gutters shall be kept clear of debris. 2) Any outbuilding shall adhere to the same wildfire requirements. 3) Yards shall be kept clear of all litter, slash and flammable debris. 4) All flammable materials shall be stored on a parallel contour a minimum of fifteen (15) feet away from any structure. 5) Weeds and grasses within the ten (10) foot perimeter shall be maintained to a height not more than six (6) inches. 6) Firewood/wood piles shall be stacked on a parallel contour a minimum of fiftec» (15) feet away from the structure. 7) Swimming pools and ponds shall be accessible by the local fire district. 8) Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris. 9) Wood fences shall not connect to other structures. 10) Fuel tanks shall be installed underground with an approved container. 1 1) Propane tanks shall be buried, if possible, or installed according to NFPA 58 standards and on a contour away from the structure with standard defensible space vegetation mitigation around any aboveground tank. Any wood enclosure around the tank shall be constructed with materials approved for two (2) hour fire -resistive construction on the exterior side of the walls. 12) Each structure shall have a minimum of one ten (10) pound ABC fire extinguisher. 13) Addresses shall be clearly marked with two (2) inch non-combustible letters and shall be visible at the primary point of access from the public or common access road and installed on a non-combustible post. 14) New utility lines shall be extended underground. 7. The Applicant shall comply with the applicable codes and requirements of the Snowmass-Wildcat Fire Protection District, including but not limited to access, turning around of fire apparatus, installation of an approved fire sprinkler system and a water supply for fire fighting. 8. The Applicant shall comply with the following measures to mitigate impacts to wildlife: A, Native vegetation shall be maintained outside of the activity envelope. B. Trash/garbage shall be kept in an approved bear resistant container or enclosure, pursuant to the County's Wildlife Protection Ordinance. Verification ofcompliance shall be provided prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Bear resistant containers shall be provided by the contractor for all edible and food related trash. C. Fencing shall comply with the following, except for fencing immediately adjacent to the buildings to contain pets or livestock: 1) Wood fencing shall employ three rails or less, be the round or split rail type, shall not exceed 48 inches in height above ground level and 12 inches in width (top view), and shall have at least 18 inches between two of the rails. 2) Wire fencing shall consist of no more than 3 strands of smooth wire and shall not exceed 42 inches in height. D. Construction workers shall be prohibited from bringing dogs on-site during construction. 9. No development including grading, excavation, fill placement, berming, landscaping, vegetation removal or disturbance, well or septic system shall occur outside of the approved activity envelope, except as necessary to comply with the wildfire mitigation measures described above. Adminurrarive Decision No.'30-1008 Page 5 10. Prior to commencement of any earthmoving or other construction activity, the Applicant shall stake the corners of the activity envelope and install construction fencing around the construction site within the perimeter of the activity envelope. The fencing shall remain in place until issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. I I All areas disturbed by construction shall be re -vegetated with native shrubs and grasses within one growing season of the project's completion. 12. Exterior lighting shall comply with the County's lighting regulations in effect at the time of installation. 13. No calculations for height, bulk, setback, size, floor area, or any other building and zoning requirements have been conducted. These requirements will be considered at the time of building permit. 14. Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this approval, or any subsequent permit(s) or approval(s) related to this property, or vested rights associated with this property. 15. Statutory vested rights for the approval contained herein are granted pursuant to the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Colorado Statutes, subject to the exceptions set forth in Pitkin County Land Use -4 C de § 2-20-170 and C.R.S. § 24-68-105. The statutory vested rights granted herein shall expire on LLs� [-S_, 2011. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES WEEKLY on the 6th day of July, 2008. APPROVED by the Director, this day of —2008. PUBLISHED AFTER ADOPTI N FOR VESTED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS in the Aspen Times Weekly on the3Lday of�, 2008. D l7' < —1 �5ILVE1 \MAN RD51DEN6E 5nO SASS (RFK POW SNOWA55 GGLORADO MT. DALY ENTERPRISES, LLC.' LANDSCAPE AR HRECR 100 N. THIRD STREET. SURE 101 CARBONDALE. COLORADO 81623 PHONE 970.963.9896 FAX 970.963.5775 rn z � 70 rn rn� rn v rn J N \ N Z y 1G ZZZR7� � �5ILVE1 \MAN RD51DEN6E 5nO SASS (RFK POW SNOWA55 GGLORADO MT. DALY ENTERPRISES, LLC.' LANDSCAPE AR HRECR 100 N. THIRD STREET. SURE 101 CARBONDALE. COLORADO 81623 PHONE 970.963.9896 FAX 970.963.5775 9<vA a-30 L9fx O,a,1 Opm �NN 0 R� x Y iv r r' it U.� 3 { � i 6� s g AAT. DALY fNWRPRFSES, LLC.' V , uaosenPe axamtcu )ILVEFMAN RE61PENGE ,00N. THIRD STREET, SUITE 102 G 1 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 \C} 5-aO 949MM95 64?EE( NOW PHONE 970.963.9896 N SN � ca -OR" FAX 970.9635775 D Pitkin County Environmental Health Department Permit for an Individual Sewage Disposal System 0405 Castle Ck Rd, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-5077 Permit # 02079 Parcel ID # 2645-144-01-001 Type of permit New ) Repair( ) Addition to House(X) Name of Owner Patricia Nettleship, Managing Partner Street Address 5720 Snowmass Creek Road Property legal description Size of lot 5 Total square footage of the house Water source # of bedrooms in house 5 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house Caretaker unit # of bedrooms Designed by Mailing Address Attached Total square footage of the caretaker unit :aretaker unit 1 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in caretaker unit a s t,i,cekerms,on,olds stom Permit # 79055) Permit information Church & Associates, Inc 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Perc rate 8 mpi Profile hole depth 8ft Depth to groundwater or bedrock +8ft Septic tank capacity y 1312 gallons minimum Absorption area 514 sf : 50% red. =297sf Septic permit approved per compliance with the engineer design and specifications dated September 10, 2002. Any changes must be approved by this department and the design engineer prior to them being made. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the Pitkin County ISDS regulations. Design is for a 1500 gallon two compartment concrete tank with effluent fitter and equally distributed to 3 trenches, each one chamber wide and 7 chambers long for a total of 21 units. This department does not endorse any brand of products. The engineer must do a final inspection of the installation and submit an as -built letter to this department. This department must also be called for an inspection with a minimum of 48 hours advanced notice. Permit approved by: Date:j 0 f / 0_'_ Plans and specifications of the proposed individual sewage disposal system ha�ve�bee/n reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be Issued. Installer: oma,.._.. . Final Approval: _____. � Void6tv, �011t' CW 4'ff4'(ba,k_)�n A_q�qnr-iafiP.q ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS September 10, 2002 Nettleship Family Partners III Attn: Tish Nettleship 5720 Snowmass Creek Road Snowmass, Colorado 81654 Subject: Subsurface Investigation and Upgrade OWS Design, Nettleship Residence Remodel 5720 Snowmass Creek Road Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 13709W Ms. Nettleship, As requested, we investigated subsurface conditions at the site and designed an onsite wastewater system (OWS) upgrade for the remodel. The previous design dated August 26, 2002 should be discarded to avoid confusion. The subsurface investigation was performed on May 29, 2001. SITE CONDITIONS The property is in a rural residential area of Pitkin County, where OWS are required. The existing residence intends to convert three existing rooms to three bedrooms. The additional bedrooms will serve a separate OWS. A separate stub -out will be needed to serve the proposed OWS. The existing septic tank and drain field will remain in use. There is a lined water feature 10 feet south of the southeast comer of the house. The proposed drain field area has a 2% slope to the west and a moderate cover of native grasses. The site is supplied water by a well, located 102+ feet from the proposed drain field. CONSTRUCTION A remodel completed in 2001 created additional area for conversion of three rooms to bedrooms. The total living area is 5000 square feet (SF). The three additional bedrooms will be served by a separate OWS, as indicated on Figure 1. The OWS was sized based three bedrooms and 600 gallons per day (GPD) using Pitkin County Environmental Health Department (PCEHD) loading of 100 gallons per day per person. The loading with a pealing factor of 1.75 is 1050 GPD. This includes washing machines and garbage grinders. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A subsurface investigation was performed by digging three percolation holes, 37 to 44 inches deep, and one profile pit at the locations indicated on Figure 1. Subsurface materials in the profile pit consisted of 1.5 feet of sandy topsoil, underlain by slightly clayey sand with gravel and boulders to the maximum depth explored of 8 feet. No ground water was encountered. Percolation tests indicate percolation rates of 5 to 10 minutes per inch (MPI). The average rate is 8 MPI. Percolation data is presented in Table 1. Additional percolation tests were performed in the area of the existing field. The results are not relevant to this design. RECOIM NITNDATIONS The installation requires a septic tank and three chamber -trenches at the locations presented on Figure 1. The OWS design is based on an average sewage load of 600 GPD and a percolation rate of 8 MPI. The DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 LOVELAND 970.663.2124 WESTERN SLOPE 970.948.5803 Subsurface - stigation and Upgrade OWS Design Job No. 13709W, 9/10/02 Page 2 installation includes one 1500 -gallon, two-compartment, precast concrete septic tank, and three chamber - trenches. Each trench must have one row of seven chambers for a total of 21 chambers. A flow splitter basin or a concrete distribution box is required to distribute effluent. Trenches must be installed within four feet of the ground surface. If gravity discharge cannot be achieved we must be contacted for pump details. Vehicle movement over the drain field area during construction should be kept at a minimum to minimize compaction of the receiving soils. The bottom of the bed should be scarified with a pick, shovel, or backhoe bucket teeth prior to the addition of chambers. The surface of the field should be seeded after installation of the fields. A native seed mix should be sown at the drain field to revegetate the surface. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed over the fields. OPERATION AND AIAPMNANCE The owner realizes an OWS is different from public sewer service. The owner must assume responsibility for maintenance of the system. In the absence of a monitoring program, the septic tank should be pumped every two years. Effluent filter and screened vaults, as applicable, are to be cleaned during pumping. There are daily considerations such as not putting plastic or other nonbiodegradable materials into the septic system. Garbage disposal use should be minimized. The backwash of a water softener may be harmful to the OWS. A separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash waste, if a softener is installed. Chemically treated water from a swimming pool or spas should not be introduced to the OWS. LIAMATIONS An OWS design should be installed by a contractor who is experienced in its installation. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted. If subsurface conditions different from those described in this report are encountered, we should be notified to evaluate the change on the proposed OWS. If the health department modifies this design, we should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the performance of the OWS. The county and our firm must be contacted upon completion of the OWS All construction is to be in accordance with the ISDS regulations. Pipe type and size, burial requirements, septic tank construction, and other specifications, which are not depicted in our report, are to conform to the requirements of the ISDS regulations. The installer of the system is to have demonstrated knowledge of the PCEHD ISDS regulations and requirements. If there are questions, please call. The project engineer for this site is Tim Petz. CHURCH & Associates, Inc. Reviewed by Timothy R. Petz Project Manager TRP/erb 3 copies sent, via FED EX Edward O. Church, P.E. � /Lu 2 _ _ \} CD E -----• \ /z § | e a 'z\[ • Iffi )(ƒ§\§# \u � �\� . ca==e moo, } ------ \ \ \ \ \\ i u \)§§\§2 LU g | | 22222 & - § \ ®`=Ja® ! -)®(\CC,/ u = | j;\5!§ §\( LLcon §�, §O4 _[8 ..§ �\ $ /LL, <, § § .\-�| §\§ @ < y?o | . }3 )zƒ \\)k\ uu § @< »§±3+/ \ / ge©�< z/ |� }LLJ /� §/ | <\ | . ƒ®R x>< @7\ \»3 � ! . � | _� < \cl 0 z \ // } co § —< \/ \ ua � % \ 2 § a \ z 0 i ) § % w ` " } E | , \ § \ � \0 \ � } \ ) �® ^) u LU k 2EL }/ $to \ k m d&�(/� <� \ \ }§o=r§ \ ozU-j \\ a§k§k8j� § u-«eA#E=# § / S@ ur�<� \ E W Ch cc cn g n ti o� z D • ��., osag Ax u O � C Ey.L b Q W L O W E d W 0-0 Q d 7 �0 0 =40 caa W m E9. x W m i s o v a f� wC7cnCDaur o a c m 4 ch 0 a3 a W E U u o c G p BOM �0Emoo! O .9 7 4 B Ln v cr ZI W V, F ( i i LL 4 p�.0 •Ll , UN Z ice.. Lo �i ()2 m a' ; n M t % ? — a-t/� m low O t 1 r O` CA < v Cd Ln 3 ui ., C �-- 2y E Y u =s nm� B a o �.o a? .g m�-m � Q E.E co Q M _ ganm r C5 c Q �� In Profile: TABLE 1 - PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS 5720 Snowmass Road Snowmass. Colorado DATE OF TEST: 5129101 0-1.5' Topsoil, sandy; root zone 1.5'-8' Sand, siightiy clayey, with gravel & bouiders, dense, moist, red/brown NO GROUND WATER WAS ENCOUNTERED WITHIN THE EXCAVATION AVG. HOLE DEPTH TIME DEPTH DEPTH INTERVAL HOLE OF BOLE, INTERVAL START, .END, INCHES CHANGE, PERC PERC. NUMBERR(INCHES) (MINUTES) (INCHES) (INCHES) ( # RATE (MP!) RATE, Impll 1 37 10 3.00 5.50 2.50 4 10 4.75 7.00 2.25 4 10 5.50 7.75 2.25 4 10 3.00 5.00 2.00 5 10 4.00 0.00 2.00 5 10 4.50 6.50 2.00 5 FEE 2 41 10 2.00 3.75 1.75 6 10 3.75 5.00 1.25 8- 10 3.00 425 1.25 8 10 4.25 5.25 1.00 10 10 3.50 4.00 1.00 10 10 4.00 5.00 1.00 10 10 3 44 10 1.25 4.00 2.75 4 10 4.00 6.00 2.00 5 10 1.50 2.25 0.75 13 10 2.25 3.50 1.25 8 10 3.50 5.00 1.50 7 10 A 2.00 3.25 1.25 8 8 ig Z-1 �udx-.. ,fob NO. 13709W C u Engineer's Submittal for Septic Permit in Pitkin County Owner's Last Name: Nettieship Family Parters III Location: 5720 Snowmass Creek Road Summary of information regarding new septic system: Type of system being proposed: GRAVELLESS CHAMBER TRENCHES Other treatment processes being used: EFFLUENT FILTER , Does the system use any mechanical parts? (Prohibited unless there is no alternative) NO If yes, explain why there are no alternatives Does the system require any maintenance other than routine pumping? YES If yes, who will do the maintenance? CLEAN FILTER WHEN SEPTIC TANK IS PUMPED Are any reductions being proposed? YES If yes, what makes the lot and soil conditions optimal? GOOD PERCOLATION RATES AND PROPOSING TRENCHES Which of the following are on the site or within setbacks? Closest distance of septic system to each feature �J 100 year floodplain NLA {Xj well(s) 102 FEET n irrigation ditches NLA (XI streams 52 FEET Q ponds NLA [j other NLA What was the profile hole depth? 8 FEET What is the depth to groundwater? N/ What is the depth to bedrock? NL What assumptions, if any, were made in system sizing and design? (Include any local, site- specific data, such as months without snow cover, ratio of evaporation to absorption, etc. that are relevant.) If there are any variations from normal design, please explain how they can be demonstrated to improve treatment and protect water quality. NONE ASPEN/PTTKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS Owner's Name Parcel ID # House Size (sq, fk) y (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 140 Number of Bedrooms in Main House Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House (There is the potential for 3 bedrooms due to conversion) Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit; (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow 600 State Review Required? no Perc Rate =z�,� (T) Design Flow (Q) = # potential bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 1050 Absorptior Area (A= Q/5 X SART) A = 594 sq. ft, of absorption area required 38 infiltrator units without reduction A maximum 50% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or graveliess chambered system, only if the lot size and soil conditions are optimal. If a reduction is being proposed, describe why lot size and soil conditions are optimal: GOOD SOIL CONDITIONS AND PROPOSING TRENCHES A = 297 sq.fL with reduction 19 infiltrator units with reduction Type of system: DAbsorption trenches flAbsorption bed jxj Gravelless chambers QDry well aSeepage Pit 00ther Minimum tank capacity 1313 gallons SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 102 SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IIRMGATION DITCH # of feet = 52 SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = FINAL INSPECTION BY: DATE: