The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.eh.272929203006 (2007)Permit # 07036 Pitkin Cc ty Environmental Health & Natural Re—urces Department r armit for an Individual Sewage Dispo- system 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-5077 Parcel I D # 2729-292-03-006 Type of permit New( <. ) Repair() Addition/Remodel to House( ) Name of Owner Patrick & Alicia Smith Street Address 795 Elk Lane Property legal description A-7 Redstone Ranch Acres Size of lot .29 Total square footage of the house 1560 sq ft Water source Private Well # of bedrooms in house 3 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house Caretaker unit Total square footage of the caretaker unit # of bedrooms in caretaker unit # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in caretaker unit Designed for what # rooms (list) 3 bedrooms Permit information Designed by Schmueser Gordon Meyer Mailing Address 118W6 th St, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Perc rate 11 Profile hole depth 8 ft Depth to groundwater or bedrock Minimum Septic tank capacity 984 gallons Minimum Absorption area Comments Greater than 8 ft 261 sq ft w/ 50% reduction Septic permit approved per compliance with the engineer design and specifications dated February 1, 2007, Project #2006-469. Any changes must be approved by this department and the design engineer prior to them being made. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the Pitkin County ISDS regulations. The well must be at least 100 feet from the absorption field. This system calls for one 1000 gallon two compartment tank with a biotube pump vault in the second compartment. The effluent will be pumped to a series of trenches. The first two trenches will have 9 Quick 4 chambers, the third trench 7 chambers, and the final trench 4 chambers. The system will be pressurized and a pump test at the time of installation must be conducted to assure even distribution throughout the system. This permit is expressly conditioned on the property owner providing for the regular inspection, cleaning and maintenance of the system by qualified personnel, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. This department does not endorse any brand of products. This permit must be kept on-site during installation. The engineer must do a final inspection of the installation and submit an as -built letter to this department. This department must also be called for an inspection with a minimum of 48 hours advanced notice. Revegetation over the area of the field is very important for the functioning of the system. Pitkin County has guidelines that must be followed to assure the plants that are introduced are appropriate for the conditions of the area. The use of native plants is strongly encouraged. � 1 Permit approved by: Date: `_' I (' 7 �_..j Expiration Dat Plans and specifications of the proposed individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the owner's agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced, or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Installer: ,�,. , ��sti License Number: Final approval:Date: fJ PITKIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 0405 Castle Creek Road, Suite 10, Aspen Colorado 81611 Phone (970) 920-5070 Fax (970) 920-5077 ENameofERg A dress � Business Phone: — 9134 Home Phone: E-mail Address: asmI (-Etejd - UUK4,1.Cv Primary Contact Person (all communication regarding this permit will go through this person) =Name Company Contact Mailing Address City, State, Zip Business Phone: Cell Phone: Fax :L7 L/ 5 " 3 �%�3 E-mail Address: Parcel ID # (available from assessor's officeLQ f\ (( 1l at 920-5160 or at www.pitkinassessor.org) Building Permit # (if available) Street address of property _ I t� f--( V, L.1,1 Legal Description: Lot A -�_ ,Block Filing Subdivision Size of lot: _.<—X 11 acres. Type of proposed structure: d Total square feet of house jy(-- Caretaker Unit: Attached ( ) Detached ( Total area(sq. ft.) of caretaker unit # of bedrooms (potential) in house # of bedrooms (potentia Il in caretaker unit Permit is for: New Home O Repair due to failure ( ) Remodel/Addition ( ) Emergency use ( ) Water: Private well (,i ) Spring ( ) Stream ( ) Community/Public Water System ( ) If community system: Name of system The fee for a ISDS application is $600 for a permit that takes 6 hours or less for the department to approve. If approval takes longer than 6 hours, a rate of $100 per hour will be charged. The maximum fee is $1000. The basic fee of $600 is due at the time of application. The remainder, if any, will be due in two stages: first, at the time of issuance of the ISDS permit; second, before final approval of the ISDS permit. Application for an individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accurate information on locations of all existing and proposed wells, contour intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes, waterlines, springs, suction or irrigation lines, drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, floodplains, dry gulches, and existing septic systems. I hereby certify that any such features not shown on attached site map are not present. Issuance of the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may be undertaken until all approvals and permits have been obtained. The Pitkin County Environmental Health Department, Pitkin County and employees of these agencies will be held harmless should the individual sewage disposal sy m fail or malfunction. The p mit to construct is issued on information submitted by the applicant or his/her representati .es.., caner assu ull resp n ' ility in case of failure of the system. Signature of applicant Date S13o Received by es p `�,t (� Receipt # � Date — 1 �2 i n lv0 u.) 04 51 SciltWk5QL Oerlon W.y k Ca� q45 0-w&A 8tlgo SCHMUESER GORDON I MEYER E N G I'.. N E E R S I SURVEYORS May 28, 2008 1--- Ms. Carla Ostberg ------ -- PITKIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT 0405 Castle Creek Rd., Ste. 10 Aspen, CO 81611 Kiz DrCF,TVED MAY 2 9 2000 ""N COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH d NATURA!. RESOURCES RE: Pitkin County ISDS Permit No. 07036 Smith Residence Certification of Installation Dear Carla: This letter represents a certification of the construction of the Patrick and Alicia Smith residence Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) under Pitkin County Environmental Health Department Permit for an Individual Sewage Disposal System No. 07036. The construction of the on-site OWTS has been completed pursuant to plans and specifications prepared by Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. dated February 1, 2007 (stamped 02-28-2007). The OWTS design for the 3 - bedroom Smith residence, at 795 Elk Lane near Redstone, was configured as four gravel -less chamber seepage trenches fed by treated wastewater routed through a septic tank totaling 1,000 gallons in capacity. I inspected the installation of the septic tank, collection system, pump system and gravel -less chamber seepage trenches pursuant to our original plans and specifications. My inspection during the construction process indicated that the system was installed in a manner generally consistent with our planset. with only minor revisions to the original design. I did note, on a field inspection on May 16, 2008, that the uppermost trenches had been revised with 6 Quick -4 chambers in the third trench (it was designed with 7) and 5 chambers in the uppermost fourth trench (it was designed with 4). This was done to accommodate an existing tree in place near the end of trench 3 and results in the same number of total chambers as in the original design. This change has no impact on the function of the system as designed. I took a few photographs of the work in progress at the time of my inspection on May 16th. As of my site visit, the septic tank was in place and the pump and filter system was installed but not wired and operational. A PVC tee was needed on the inlet side of the tank. All four seepage trenches had been completed and, with the minor revision noted above, the trenches appeared to be level and showing the appropriate total number of chambers per our design. Since my inspection on May 16tH a member of our staff was back on-site to observe that the pump system had been wired and is now operational, demonstrating good flow to the far end of the system. r.✓ GLENWOOD SPRINGS ASPEN CRESTED BUTTE .... 1 1 8 W. 6TH,SUITE 200 P.O. BOX 21 55 P.O. BOX 3088 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81 601 ASPEN, CO 81612 CRESTED BUTTE, CO 81 224 970-945-1004 970-925-6727 970-349-5355 FX: 970-945-5948 FX: 970-925-4157 FX: 970-349-5358 Ms. Carla Ostberg ------ -- PITKIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT 0405 Castle Creek Rd., Ste. 10 Aspen, CO 81611 Kiz DrCF,TVED MAY 2 9 2000 ""N COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH d NATURA!. RESOURCES RE: Pitkin County ISDS Permit No. 07036 Smith Residence Certification of Installation Dear Carla: This letter represents a certification of the construction of the Patrick and Alicia Smith residence Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) under Pitkin County Environmental Health Department Permit for an Individual Sewage Disposal System No. 07036. The construction of the on-site OWTS has been completed pursuant to plans and specifications prepared by Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. dated February 1, 2007 (stamped 02-28-2007). The OWTS design for the 3 - bedroom Smith residence, at 795 Elk Lane near Redstone, was configured as four gravel -less chamber seepage trenches fed by treated wastewater routed through a septic tank totaling 1,000 gallons in capacity. I inspected the installation of the septic tank, collection system, pump system and gravel -less chamber seepage trenches pursuant to our original plans and specifications. My inspection during the construction process indicated that the system was installed in a manner generally consistent with our planset. with only minor revisions to the original design. I did note, on a field inspection on May 16, 2008, that the uppermost trenches had been revised with 6 Quick -4 chambers in the third trench (it was designed with 7) and 5 chambers in the uppermost fourth trench (it was designed with 4). This was done to accommodate an existing tree in place near the end of trench 3 and results in the same number of total chambers as in the original design. This change has no impact on the function of the system as designed. I took a few photographs of the work in progress at the time of my inspection on May 16th. As of my site visit, the septic tank was in place and the pump and filter system was installed but not wired and operational. A PVC tee was needed on the inlet side of the tank. All four seepage trenches had been completed and, with the minor revision noted above, the trenches appeared to be level and showing the appropriate total number of chambers per our design. Since my inspection on May 16tH a member of our staff was back on-site to observe that the pump system had been wired and is now operational, demonstrating good flow to the far end of the system. t May 28, 2008 Ms. Carla Ostberg ISDS Permit No. 07036 Page 2 I trust this letter will provide adequate certification of the installation of the Smith residence on-site wastewater treatment system pursuant to plans and specifications prepared by our firm. Please feel --.-+- free to contact me if I may provide further information or provide you with copies of any of the photographs that were taken during my site visit earlier this month. Very Truly Yours, SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. Jay W. Hammond, P.E. Principal, Aspen Office JH/jh 2006-469COl cc: Mr. Patrick Smith 0 ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS - for Pitkin Owner's Name Parcel ID # House Size (sq. ft.) ;kms k,, ;,�: (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 75 Number of Bedrooms in Main House Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow 1 450 State Review Required? no Perc Rate�w'' (T) Design Flow (Q) = # potential bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 787.5 Minimum tank capacity 984.375 gallons Absorption Area (=Q/5 X SQRT perc rate) A = 522 sq. ft. of absorption area required 34 gravelless chamber units without reduction # of Perc Holes Required: 3 QUICK 4 9-8 A = 261.1842 sq.ft. with 50% reductionTRENCHES 27 gravelless chamber units with reduction STANDARD A = 261.1842 sq.ft. with 50% reductionTRENCHES 17 gravelless chamber units with reduction EQ 36 16 EQ36 units in TRENCHES QUICK4-EQ36 261 34 SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 100 SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet = 50 SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = 25 UICK 4 9.2 365.65788 sq ft 30% reduction BED 40 chamber units with reduc. 365.65788 sq ft 30% reduction BED 24 chamber units with reduc. 29 EQ36 units in a BED 366 57 z Pitkin County Environmental Health Department Contact Log Sheet D• Address: 'poken To Person S- Comments Action to be Taken Uffffl,�� _ �.._. SVA �,__ iOWA AM '��i � - ., A i ►.�.i ..: mid OEM MM IMMUMMOMANIM 0 -32 G OWN, 3*iech 490 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL August 18, 2006 Alicia and Patrick Smith 1208 Pitkin Avenue Hepworth- .w1ak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo®hpgeotech.com Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Job No.106 0688 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed Residence, Lot A-7, Redstone Ranch Acres, 795 Elk Lane, Pitkin County, Colorado Dear Mr. and Mrs. Smith: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated August 1, 2006. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Evaluation of potential geologic hazard impacts on the site are beyond the scope of this study. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a one and two story wood frame construction above a crawlspace and located on the site as shown on Figure 1. Cut depths are expected to range between about 3 to 4 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The septic disposal system is proposed to be located slightly uphill and east of the residence. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The building area is located in a small clearing on the south side of Elk Drive. Vegetation consists of an evergreen forest with scattered aspen trees and understory of grass, weeds and brush. The ground surface in the building area slopes moderately down to the west. A very steep hillside is located just south of the proposed residence. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits in the building and in the septic disposal areas at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about one foot of topsoil, consist of slightly silty sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders. Results of a gradation analysis perf6rmed on a sample of sandy gravel (minus 3 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Figure 3. Parker 303-841-7119 9 Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthome 970-468-1989 -? - The laboratory test results are summarized in Table 1. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil, below topsoil, designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf for support of the proposed residence. The soils tend to compress after wetting and there could be some post -construction foundation settlement. FootinLys should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can also create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and crawlspace areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 Job No. 106 0688 -3- sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1'/ feet deep. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A swale may be needed uphill to direct surface runoff around the residence. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on August 4, 2006 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Figure 1. The test holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Figure 2 and consist of slightly silty sandy gravel with cobbles and small boulders. The percolation test results are presented in Table 1. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. Pitkin County requires that a civil engineer design the septic disposal system. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. Job No.] 06 0688 GV&iectt n This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. his E. Eller Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P. LEE/ksw attachments Job No. 106 0688 -•• rr11OpP^' Figure 1 — Location of Exploratory Pits Figure 2 — Logs of Exploratory Pits Figure 3 — Gradation Test Results Table 1 — Summary of Percolation Test Results to 'IyO1NH03W3'J ?[Y'iMYd+i13iOMd3H G a�n61d ST10H 1S31 NOLVIOOd3d 9990 90 L ONb Sild kdojV�jMdX3 dO NOLVOM u� Ham`' iS3dOd d3 OSS d331S ,kU3A m Ed Zd7 Gd ild 3�HOdd/L ild z m C� 0 iS3HOd m m 30N3CISIH m a3SOdOUd m m -v Z ild 3d0 -is d331S Al EA iS3HOd 3IdOS 01 lON ' L..A PIT 1/PROFILE PIT PIT 2 ELEV. = ELEV.= 0 ;. a p.. 15 LL 5 .•o'. -_ - WC=8.4 .a0' J +4=64 ° o •O. -200=8 C 5 Q F 10 10 J LLEEGG.END: TOPSOIL; gravelly silt and sand, cobbles, moist, black. o: o: GRAVEL (GM): slightly silty to silty, sandy, with cobbles and boulders, medium dense to dense, slightly moist, • b red, subrounded and subangular rocks. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. Disturbed bulk sample. _J NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on August 3, 2006 with a Case 9030 trackhoe. 2. Locations of explorator/ pits were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and the logs of exploratory pits are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 1060688 1 Ise +eCh I LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS I Figure 2 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS )OB N0. 106 0688 HOLE N0, HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) I WATER DEPTH AT OF NT R AL INCHES WATER DEPTH AT END OF INT RVAL INCHES DROP IN WATER LEVELSTART (IN HES) -- AVERAGE PERCOLATION (MIN./INCH) TE Pi 34 10 Water added 10 73/4 21/4 13 73/4 61/2 11/4 101/2 9 11/2 9 73/4 11/4 7 3/4 63/4 1 63/4 6 3/4 6 5 1/4 3/4 5 1/4 41/2 3/4 P 2 45 10 Water added 83/4 53/4 3 13 5 3/4 41/2 11/4 10 81/4 13/4 81/4 7 11/4 7 6 1 6 51/4 3/4 51/4 41/2 3/4 41/2 33/4 3/4 34 10 Water added Water added Water added 71/2 3 1/2 4 1 7 P3 71/2 4 31/2 4 2 2 8 53/4 21/4 53/4 3 1/2 21/4 73/4 6 13/4 6 41/4 13/4 4 1/4 21/2 13/4 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on August 3, 2006. Percolation tests were conducted on August 4, 2006. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test. Page 1 of 1 Nancy Mackenzie From: Michael Kraemer Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 1:37 PM To: Nancy Mackenzie Subject: Smith septic permit application Nancy, If the proposed septic field is located within the original building envelope I do not have an issue with Alicia submitting for a septic: permit. If you need any additional information let me know Mike Mike Kraemer Planner Community Development Department Pitkin County 130 S. Galena Street Aspen; CO 81611 970.920.5526(phone) 970.920.5439(fax) michaelk@co.pitkin.co.us 5/2/2007 Map Output Page 1 of 1 0-?�Q Q9 �?— —WLQ ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma �\ �X N/y,V V Y 4 'd' Legend Cities 8 Towns Ts€LJGB aT yyl O �y Addresses -"'.� .airport Rwr a -. %� Roads Edge :)! P:ivi-,,T Eayie & Gay f,_•'d Dftes Riftrn & 5heefns C ` lY tondos k 44D 06 4 - o!I Q ❑ Pame's E3 Structums Lakes & Ponds 1:3 Caucuses CR C l��-�f.®. Fa Pa•i Gv eiy, � 1 �7 �ticln A"8 --t) http://205.170.51.230/servleticom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=Pitkinzone&Client... 3/17/2007 D / 3�v Page 1 of 1 Nancy Mackenzie From: Nancy Mackenzie Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 8:18 AM To: Michael Kraemer Subject: Patrick & Alicia Smith Lot A-7 redstone Ranch Acres Mike, I was at this site yesterday. The proposed location of the well will meet the required setbacks from their proposed septic components and the neighbors. So we have no concerns with this lot. Did you need anything else? Nancy Nancy MacKenzie 970-920-5076 Pitkin County Environmental Health & Natural Resources Department Environmental Health Specialist 3/22/2007 0 Page 1 of 1 Nancy Mackenzie From: Nancy Mackenzie Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 11:49 AM To: Michael Kraemer Subject: Lot A-7 Redstone Ranch Acres Alicia Sm' frantically calling to be able to get her well drilled tomorrow. She said you needed to know if there re septic systems on the surrounding lots. Our records show that the surrounding lots A-6, A-8 and A-9 (parcel #'s ending in -012, -011, -007) have very old septic systems some place on each property. These are from the 1970's so we just have sketches of some of them, nothing to scale on a plat. So I could not state that a well on this lot would be a minimum of 100 ft from a neighboring septic field. The other concern is that since this is such a small lot, the neighboring wells should be located to insure that the future location of Lot A -7's septic can be 100 ft from them. The engineer designing their septic system is supposed to check on these well setbacks when designing the septic and should b e consulted on the well location. If I had info from the engineer showing the surrounding lots and well and septic locations, I could give you a more definite answer (maybe). Nancy Nancy MacKenzie 970-920-5076 Pitkin County Environmental Health & Natural Resources Department Environmental Health Specialist 3/12/2007 05!03/200' 09:22 970945?'_? ASSESSOR PAGE 02/02 Form No. OFFICE OF Th,, STATE E GINEER GWS -25 COLORADO DIVISION OF ATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg„ 1313 Sherman St., Denverh Colorado 80203 (303)866-3581 LIC WELT. PERMIT NUMBER 269919 -_ APPLICANT DIV, 5 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD - Lot: A-7 Block: Filing: Subdiv_ RE=DSTONE RANCH ACRES APPROVED WELL LOCATION PITKIN COUNTY SE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 29 ALICIA A SMITH Township 10 S Range 88 W Sixth P.M. 1208 PITKIN AVENUE DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601- 3250 Ft. from South Section Line (970) 945-1360 3750 Ft. from East Section Line UTM COORDINATES (Meters Zone:13,NAD83) Easting: Northing: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CO SOF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used In such a way as to cause no mbterial Injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur td another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water rlght from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with! the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors In accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a residential site of 0.29 acre(s) described as lot A-7, Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision, Pitkin County. 4) The use of groundwater from this well is limited to ordintiry household purposes inside one single family dwelling_ The ground water shall not be used for Irrigation or other purposes. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed, 15 GPM, 6) The return flow from the use of this well must be through an indfvldual waste water disposal system of the non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 7) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. NOTE: Expired permit no. 110684 was previously issued for this I APPROVED JSG .4 . State Engineer By ceint No. 9502586 DATE ISSUED 07-25-2008 t IRATION DATE 07-25-2008 0 C, Shelton Drilling Corp P.O. Box 1059 Basalt. Co. 81621 (970) 927-4182 Lic. # 1095 Name : Patrick & Alicia Smith c/o Address : 1208 Pitkin Ave City, St, Zip : Glenwood Springs Co 81601 Phone # — L_j Invoice 41: C-2682 Date 4/9/2007 Permit #: 269919 Location : Redstone Hole Size Depth Type Casing 10 Casing OD From -To Perforated Ft : 30 ft Estimated 15 gpm 9.0 73 Steel 6 5 7 0 0-73 Static Level : 45 ft 6.5 95 Steel 5.0 5.5 65-95 Total Drilled :_95 ft Recommended Pump Set Depth 90 Ft. Pumping 15 GPM For Pump Installation We Recommend : Samuelson Pump 945-6309 (Raun Samuelson) 3 &. M Pump Co 945-6159 (Rick Holub) Aqua Tec Pump 984-0311 (Tom Platter) Instructions : Price Per Foot 95 Feet�3a`, $ 40.00 Per Foot = $ 3.800.00 _ Feet @ $ Per Foot = $ 0.00 ^- Total Footage Charge $ 3,800.00 S Minimum Well Charge ( ) . .(if applicable) ...........$ Conditions Of Payment : --- ----- pay $ 3,800.00 Pz E ASE RED THS, DI.AI OWING RFCO"*tt[MENDATION� 1. *WE STRONGLY RECOMMEND A VALID PUMP TEST BE CONDUCTED BY A LICENSED PUMP INSTALLER DETERMINE TQUCT ODDWATER ESHOULD ISH THE ACTUAL WELL ON PARAMETERS WHICH CANNOT BE WHILE DRILLING 2. OUR GUARANTEE IS VALID ONLY IF A LICE2�TSED PUMM INSTALLER INSTALLS THE PLMPING SYSTEM I!!; 3. The landowner is ultimately responsible for the plugging and abandonment of dry holes or replaced wells. according to State Rules and Regulations. Please contact us for details andlor prices. NL cS aRRA:tiG� 4 AI L iN_V�Ij'rc nr:F A N n p,►YABLi` WFTBE.I�JQJ)1 Y_S_{_F it�YM-EA.A —I NLS-S---�'� �� n xv '4 AY RF AJ &F=2 15 Ys FRO -'M FIRST BLINfi.s Please call us if you have any questions. THANK YQL R 1r ♦ , �' R ♦i�f�� Y co>nmdo n� ens of Pit Health and Environment Patrick Smith Laboratory Services on 8100 Lowry Boulevar nver CO 80230-6928 US Mail: PO Box 17123, Denver CO 80217 (303)692-3090 fax(303)344-9989 well Ground water J and M Pump Inc 8611 117 Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Contact Name Contact Phone Lab ID No. MSA -2007002315 Collected 4/25/2007 3:30:OOPN Received 4/26/2007 10:30:OOAM Reported 4/26/2007 Collected By Rich Routine Chlorine residual Matrix Drinking Water Test Name Result Method Name Escherichia coli PA E. coli not detected Total coliforms PA Coliform absent or less than one (<I), SM 9223 indicates a microbiologically safe sample LARS Interent Address: http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/ir/lrhom.htm Modification Date:4/26/2007 4203 Payment Type Billed UPPER FLOOR PLAN 720.0 SQ. FT. (INCLUDING STAIRS) ALL INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR RAKED WALLS ARE TO BE FRAMED FULL HEIGHT w/ BLOCKING @ 8'-0" o.c. STUDS EXCEEDING 20' IN LENGTH ARE TO BE 2-2x LAMINATED STUDS w/ STAGGERED JOINTS - INDICATES GLU-LAM POST - INDICATES NAIL -LAM POST (SOLID BEARING) L� - INDICATES POINT LOAD w 0 The contractor (builder) is held responsible for checking and verifying all dimensions on this drawing. Any discrepancies shall be reported immediately to Linwood Homes for correcgons and I or interpretation. This drawing is considered proprietary. R is not to be reproduced, nor is the information thereon to be used to produce products, unless written consent is first obtained from Linwood Homes. DRAWN BY: AS BCIN NUMBER: CHECKED BY: PB/RL SCALE: DATE: DECEMBER 11, 2007 SALES OFFICE: CEDAR DESIGNS SALESREP: ROB CHODOWSKI MODEL: MODIFIED MONT BLANC CUSTOMER: SMITH P fi A REVISION NUMBER: VERSION 3 PRODUCTION #: PAGE EVERY NOTATION FOLLOWED BY N.I.C.INDICATES THAT THE ITEM IS NOT INCLUDED IN CONTRACT154858612OF7 Wiring to Circuit Breaker Panel Waste Line from Bldg. Connects to Bldg. Vent System Alarm and Connection Box Gravity Wye and/or Ejector Pump effluent connection Ejector Pum11 p Effluent line if required NATIVE BACKFILL 12" MIN. 12n 34 I" PVC Perforated Distribution Line 62UICK4 STANDARD TRENCH SECTION N. I. S. UNDERGROUND CABLES FOR PUMP AND ALARM CONTROL ALLOW EXTRA CABLE ON POWER & ALARM CABLES 12" COVER Riser Pipe Access 5» a Copeland Concrete, Inc. 1,000—Gcl/on Baffled Septic Tank Set Float Levels Based On Design Calculations 4" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED TO 959 MOD. PROCTOR 4" DIAMETER BAFFLE PENETRATION ORENCO HIGH HEAD EFFLUENT PUMP (� HP, PJ00511, OAE) PVC ACCESS RISER & INSULATED LID (24" 0) 1.5 " 0 POLYETHYLENE FORCE MAIN ORENCO B/OTUBE PUMP VAULT (PVU 57-1819, OAE) TYPICAL INSTALLATION OF TANKS, PUMP & CONTROLS NOT TO SCALE LOCATE SEWER CLEANOUT AT ALL HORIZONTAL CHANGES IN DIRECTION GREATER THAN 45' OR VERTICAL CHANGES IN DIRECTION GOING FROM STEEPER PIPE SLOPE TO SHALLOWER PIPE SLOPE 45' PVC WYE OR ELBOW 34" ►I — PL UG 45° PVC ELBOW FLOW no d FLOW CLEAN-OUT DETAIL NTS GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL MATERIALS, INSTALLATION PRACTICES, SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, ETC., SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PITKIN COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS REGULATIONS. 2. LOCATION OF THE TRENCH MAY BE ADJUSTED IN THE FIELD TO MINIMIZE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING VEGETATION, PROVIDED ALL SETBACKS ARE MET. FILL AREAS AND AREAS REQUIRING RE—GRADING SHALL BE AVOIDED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT LAYOUT ACCOMMODATES SITE SLOPE AND STRUCTURAL/PLUMBING ELEVATIONS. 3. PIPING IN THE ISDS SYSTEM SHALL BE STANDARD SEWER PIPE ASTM D3034, EXCEPT AS NOTED. 4. THE AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESEEDED WITH NATIVE GRASS TO PREVENT EROSION OR SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LOT LANDSCAPING. 5. USE RISERS AS NEEDED TO BRING SEPTIC TANK ACCESS HATCHES WITHIN 8" OF FINISHED GRADE. 6. SDR -35 PVC PIPE OR PIPE OF EQUAL STRENGTH OR OTHER PIPE PROPERLY SUPPORTED TO PREVENT FAILURE BY SETTLING SHALL EXTEND FROM THE SEPTIC TANK FOR A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST FIVE FEET (5') FROM THE INLET AND OUTLET ENDS. 7. AN OSI BIOTUBE EFFLUENT PUMP WITH FILTER SHALL BE PART OF THIS PACKAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD INCLUDE ALL PIPING, WIRING AND ELECTRICAL/CONTROLS FOR THIS SYSTEM. 8. THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL TAKE WHATEVER MEASURES ARE NECESSARY TO ASSURE THAT (a) SEPTIC TANK AND SEWER LINES ARE COMPLETELY WATER TIGHT, AND (b) THE SYSTEM IS INSTALLED TO PREVENT FREEZING OF ALL GRAVITY SEWER LINES. 9. THE PITKIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED WHEN CONSTRUCTION COMMENCES AND KEPT ABREAST OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS SO THAT SUFFICIENT INSPECTION CAN BE PERFORMED TO ASSURE CONFORMANCE WITH THESE PLANS. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS NOTICE TO EACH. 10. THE FOLLOWING PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE IS RECOMMENDED FOR THE LIFE OF THE ISDS SYSTEM: A. PUMP THE SEPTIC TANK AT LEAST ONCE EVERY TWO YEARS. B. CHECK PLUMBING FIXTURES ON A REGULAR BASIS AND REPAIR ALL LEAKS WHICH CAN ADD SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNTS OF WATER TO THE SYSTEM. 11. NO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SHALL BE ALLOWED ON THE PROPOSED TRENCH AREA 12. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBOJTY TO VERIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS THAT MAY EFFECT THE LOCATIONS OF THE ISDS FACILITIES DRAWN. VERIFICATION IS TO BE MADE WITH THE OWNER AND THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES. 13. SUBSTITUTION OF MATERIALS (I.E. PIPE, TANKS, ETC.) IS ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED VERIFICATION AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE ENGINEER AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER IS OBTAINED. 14. THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ALL KNOWN UTILITIES (WATER, SEWER, GAS, PHONE, ELECTRIC, CABLE, ETC.) ARE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL UTILITY OWNERS TO VERIFY BOTH LOCATION AND DEPTH OF UTILITIES BEFORE ANY WORK BEGINS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PROTECTION OF UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR UTILITIES LOCATED BUT NOT SHOWN IN DRAWINGS. 15. FOLLOW ALL CDPHE (COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTHAND ENVIRONMENT) AND PITKIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REGULATIONS FOR WATER AND SEWER LINE CROSSINGS. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE ALL MISCELLANEOUS UTILITIES THAT WILL CROSS OR PARALLEL THE LINE PRIOR TO INSTALLING NEW LINE. IF GRADE CONFLICTS OCCUR, CONTACT ENGINEER SO THAT GRADES CAN BE ADJUSTED. 17. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE THIS PLAN WITH LANDSCAPING, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING PLANS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ENSURE WATER SERVICES ARE KEPT 10' FROM SEPTIC SYSTEM APPURTENANCES OR SLEEVE THE WATER LINE IN SCHEDULE 40 PVC WHERE THE WATER SERVICE IS WITHIN 10 FEET OF SEPTIC SYSTEM ITEMS. 18. A 1000—GAL SEPTIC TANK WILL BE USED WITH A 1—FT CONCRETE UP AROUND THE BASE FOR ANCHORING TO PREVENT FLOTATION IN GROUND WATER. THE BASE SHOULD INCLUDE g3 REBAR, MINIMUM OF 24" O.C. EACH WAY. WITH HOOKED ENDS PER DETAILS, AND SHOULD BE CENTERED IN THE SLAB OR HIGHER. NATIVE SOIL SHOULD BE BACKFILLED AROUND THE TANK AT A MINIMUM OF 90% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. ,1000 GALLON. SEP77C TANK (SEE DETAIL SHEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft J% MIN SLOPE BACK TO SEPTIC TANK ` 9QUICK 4 UNITS EACH TRENCH 7 QUICK 4 UN175 4 QUICK 4 UNITS - 0709-':;n9- o3-oou PROPERTY LINE ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS 1. DETERMINE DESIGN FLOW USING 175% OF AVERAGE DAILY FLOW PROPOSED HOUSE IS 1440 S.F. Q = (3BR) X (2 PEOPLE/BR) X (75 GAL/PER/DAY) X 1.75 = 788 GPD 2. SEPTIC TANK SIZE VOLUME = 788 GPD X 1.25 (30 HOUR RETENTION TIME) = 985 GAL, USE 2 - COMPARTMENT 1,000 -GAL TANK (SMALLEST AVAILABLE FROM COPELAND CONCRETE) 3. ABSORPTION AREA REQUIRED A = (Q((SQ.RT)(()))5 A = (788 GPD(SQ.RT(11))/5 =523 SF 507REDUCTION FOR TRENCH CONFIGURATION, A = 523 SF X 0.5 = 262 SF QUICK 4 STANDARD INFILTRATION CHAMBER ABSORPTION AREA = 9.87 SF, 262 SF/9.87 SFICHAMBER = 27 CHAMBER UNITS REQUIRED 2 ROWS OF 9 CHAMBER UNITS EACH, 1 ROW OF 7 CHAMBER UNITS EACH AND I ROW OF 4 CHAMBER UNITS = 29 CHAMBER UNITS 29 CHAMBER UNITS X 9.87 SF/CHAMBER =286 286 SF ;,(1097 OF REQUIRED AREA)