Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.eh.272929300018 (2001)Pitkin County Environmental Health Department Permit for an Individual Sewage Disposal System 0405 Castle Ck Rd, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070 / FAX 970-920-5077 Permit # 01027 Parcel ID # 2729-293-00-018 Type of permit New( x) Repair( ) Addition to House( ) Name of Owner Bob & Darlene Hanula Street Address 1424 Bobcat Lane, Redstone Property legal description Size of lot 36.2 acres Total square footage of the house 2,240 Water source Private Well # of bedrooms in house 3 # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house Caretaker unit Total square footage of the caretaker unit # of bedrooms in caretaker unit # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in caretaker unit Designed for what # rooms (list) THREE (3) bedrooms Permit information Designed by Church and Associates, Inc. Mailing Address 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Perc rate 38 mpi Profile hole depth 8 ft Depth to groundwater or bedrock + 8 ft Septic tank capacity 1313 gallons minimum Absorption area 1295 sq ft(50% chamber -trench reduc=647) Comments Septic permit approved per compliance with the engineer design and specifications dated May 11, 2001 with revised page 1. Any changes must be approved by this department and the design engineer prior to them being made. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the Pitkin County ISDS regulations. The trenches must be installed 32 ft from the road cut to maintain required setbacks. The design is for a 1500 gallon two-compartment concrete tank with an effluent filter on the outlet and a 50% reduction in field size for chamber -trenches. Three trenches 1 unit wide by 14 units long = 42 units total. This department does not endorse any brand of products. The engineer must do a final inspection of the installation and submit an as -built letter to this department. This department must also be called for an inspection with a minimum of 48 hours advanced notice. Permit approved by: 4 , Date: 5 j Plans and specifications of the pr osed individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Installer: Final Inspection Approval: Date: FA" ■. July 31, 2001 CHURCH Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Manuppella Enterprises, Inc. Attn: Marc Jaffrey 7800 Highway 82, Suite 106 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Subject: Installation Observation, Proposed Hanula Residence 1424 Bobcat Lane, Redstone Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 12923W Mr. Jaffrey, RECEIVED AUG 2 2001 PITKIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH As requested, we observed the installation of the onsite wastewater system (OWS) for the subject site on July 17, 2001. The system was designed under our Job No. 12923W, dated May 11, 2001. The system includes the installation of a 1500 -gallon, two-compartment, precast concrete septic tank with an eluent filter on the outlet, and three chamber -trenches. Each trench had one row of fourteen chambers for a total infiltrative area of 651 square feet. An as -built drawing is included as Figure 1. The components of the OWS were installed in conformance with our plans and specifications. If there are questions or if we may be of further service, please call. Sincerely, CHURCH and COZ_ =-� Edward O. Church, P. EOC/trp/erb 2 copies sent copy to APEHD, Attn: Nancy MacKenzie DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 LOVELAND 970.663.2124 L ca O N (O N W C rn r r U) 0 n.. n z Ol m rn S--ID0� >;u ;u m m 0=W m(n Cn 0zDN TZ0ZD Zm0c� mm —n noZ�m 0 =- *rnrnT 0OoN17CO c) P; Zm�� rn o C D Z�rn m 0Ozn =rn 0mtnm Cl) 0== -° �m 000 O 0 v V Ln O 4 �Ct) uy CA) r om z z D -o rn rn��, Z rn ,_ 4 V Ln O 4 �Ct) uy CA) r om ASPE' TKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH i 4.RTMENT APPLICX,,)N FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DIS', w4kL SYSTEM 130 S. Galena St., Aspen Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970-920-5074 Name of OWNER �60b $ -Z)O,%1 Al AQN,\Q , - ` Owner's Mailing Address �1rZ�j %1, i0b 5-! Scc,A ► A -L "25l Business Phone: Home Phone: Primary Contact Person (all communication regarding this permit will go through this person) Name . *-a VrQS(ot Company P\oNsR 1,R Contact Maii ng Address 140Cb Z wtp. G'%V,)C S C Business Phone: 0%$Q Cell Phone: 3-721 201% Fax : 915 — 6-6 (A 0 Parcel ID # (available from assessor's office at 920-5160 or at www.aspen.comlassessor/) Street address of property t AZ -1 6tbo, art . kA AQ.,x9 . Cb `hllc 2 3 Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Subdivision Size of lot: Sic ; St acres. Type of proposed structure: 14 Size of bldg. envelope Total square feet of house Z Z 1A G # of bedrooms in house] # of offices, lofts & similar sized rooms in house 1 OFy',\4Q , k +moo; 0. 335 `5,, F , Caretaker Unit: Attached ( ) Detached ( ) Total area(sq. ft.) of caretaker unit N /14 i+ of hPrirnnmS in caretaker unit t�L /A # of offices, lofts and similar size rooms of caretaker unit Permit is for: New Home ( Repair due to failure ( ) Remodel/Addition ( ) Emergency use ( ) Water: Private well (X Spring ( ) Stream ( ) Community/Public Water System ( ) If community system: Name of system The fee for a ISDS application is $330 for a permit that takes 6 hours or less for the department to approve. If approval takes longer than 6 hours, a rate of $55 per hour will be charged. The maximum fee is $1000. The basic fee of $330 is due at the time of application. The remainder, if any, will be due in two stages: first, at the time of issuance of the ISDS permit; second, before final approval of the ISDS permit. Application for an individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accurate information on locations of all existing and proposed wells, contour intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes, waterlines, springs, suction or irrigation lines, drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, floodplains, dry gulches, and existing septic systems. I hereby certify that anv such features not shown on attached site map are not present. Issuance of the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may be undertaken until all approvals and permits have been obtained. The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department, Pitkin County and employees of these agencies will be held harmless should the individual sewage disposal system fail or malfunction. The permit to construct is issued on information submitted by the applicant or his/her representatives. The owner assumes full responsibility in case of failure of the system. Signature of appli Received by 'L Receipt # C:\eh\isds\isdsapk sapp. Date S X16% Date 0 to z7 Pitkin County Environmental Health Department 0405 Castle Creek Rd, Suite 10. Aspen, CO 81611 FAX/MEMO [�] TO: Scott Manuppella Phone: Fax Phone: CC: I REMARKS: Scott, Date: 8/16/01 Number of pages including cover sheet: 2 FROM: Nancy MacKenzie Phone: 970-920-5076 Fax Phone: 970-920-5077 E-mail: nancym(a�ci.aspen.co.us ❑ Urgent ❑ For your review ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please Comment As I told you when you called for a final inspection, due to staff shortage and work load this department was not able to do the final inspection. The engineer is required to always do a final inspection and we will rely on your engineer. The engineer has sent us their letter stating they did a final installation inspection and a final drawing. Therefore, everything that is required by this department has been done and I am faxing you the septic permit for Bob and Darlene Hanula with my "Final Inspection Approval". CHURCH & Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS May 11, 2001 Rte, &� l Manuppella Enterprises Inc., Attm Marc Jaffrey 7800 Highway 82, Suite 106 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Subject: Revised OWS Design, Proposed Hanula Residence 1424 Bobcat Lane, Redstone, SWA, Section 29, TIOS, R88W, e PM Pitkin County, Colorado Job No. 12923W Mr. Jaffrey, As requested, we investigated subsurface conditions and designed an onsite wastewater system (OWS), to be located in the provided septic envelope for the proposed residence. Our firm investigated subsurface conditions on April 25, 2001. All previous OWS designs for the site should be discarded to avoid confusion. SITE CONDITIONS The site is a 35.0 -acre parcel located in a rural residential area in Pitkin County, Colorado. The location of the proposed three-bedroom residence is presented on Figure 1. The slope at the proposed field area is 25% to the northwest. The ground has a moderate cover of aspen and evergreen trees, brush, grass, and weeds. The residence will be served by an onsite well located 104+ feet from the proposed drain field. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION A three-bedroom single-family residence having between 2000 and 6000 square feet (SF) of living area is proposed as indicated on Figure 1. The sewage loading for a three-bedroom dwelling having more than 2000 SF is 600 gallons per day (GPD) based on two people per bedroom and 100 GPD per person The sewage loading with a 1.75 peaking factor is 1050 GPD. The design loading includes washing machines and garbage grinders. Discharge from a water softener, spa or pool should not be directed to the OWS. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A subsurface investigation was performed by digging a profile pit 8 feet deep and 4 percolation holes, 17 to 44.5 inches deep, at locations indicated on Figure 1. The new percolation holes are identified as holes P-7 through P-10. Subsurface materials in the profile pit consisted of 1.5 feet of sandy topsoil, underlain by silty, clayey, sand with gravel and boulders to the maximum depth explored of 8 feet. Ground water was not observed. Percolation tests indicate percolation rates of 16 to 80 minutes per inch (MPI). The average percolation rate is 38 MPI. Percolation data is presented in Table 1. RECOMMENDATIONS The installation of a septic tank, a flow splitter basin and three chamber -trenches is proposed as presented on Figure 1. The OWS design is based on an average sewage load of 600 GPD and a percolation rate of 38 MPL The installation must include one 1500 -gallon, two-compartment, precast concrete septic tank with an DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CASTLE ROCK 303.660.4358 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 EVERGREEN 303.816.1455 LOVELAND 970.663.2.24 z•d dLE:EO 10 LI Rew 4501 Wadsworth Blvd. Wheat Ridge, CO. 80033 castle Rock 303-660-4358 FAX 303-663-1249 455 FAX 1942 Loveland 970-6663-2124 FAX 970-663-2181 F �!-O !0 7 qA CHURCH & Phone303-463-9317 Phos Fax: 303-463-9321 n prom: ,_ g N a t4 To; ry A (�tLY t ��- Date: S ) 7 0 company: Fax No. (( Q ►�1 Cs(i EGc toN Re: ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ As Requested ❑Please Reply Fax' -J—� cc: PAGES ( 1 l( NCLUDlNG COVER SHEE T •d dL6:60 To LT Rew Revised OWS Design Job No. 12923W Page 2 eluent filter on the outlet and three chamber -trenches. Each trench must have I row of 14 chambers. A 4 - inch perforated PVC pipe must be placed beneath chambers on ground surface following manufacturer specifications. A flow splitter basin will distribute effluent throughout the fields. The trenches must be installed 32 feet from road cut to maintain required setbacks. Vehicle movement over the drain field trenches during construction should be kept at a minimum to reduce compaction of the receiving soils. The bottom of the trenches should be scarified with a pick, shovel, or backhoe bucket teeth prior to placement of the chambers. The surface of the field should be seeded after installation. A native seed mix available at seed stores should be sown. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed over the fields. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE The owner must realize an OWS is different from public sewer service. The owner must assume responsibility for maintenance of the system. In the absence of a monitoring program, the septic tank should be pumped every two years. The effluent filter is be cleaned during pumping. There are daily considerations such as not putting plastic or other nonbiodegradable materials into the septic system. Garbage disposal use should be minimized. The backwash of a water softener may be harmful to the OWS. A separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash waste, if a softener is installed. Chemically treated water from a swimming pool or spas should not be introduced to the OWS. LE%HTATIONS An OWS design should be installed by a contractor who is experienced in its installation. Our investigation, layout, design and recommendations are based on data submitted. If subsurface conditions different from those described in this report are encountered, we should be notified to evaluate the effect on the OWS. If the health department makes modifications to this design, we should be contacted to evaluate the impact on the performance of the OWS. The county and our firm must be contacted upon completion of the OWS All construction is to be in accordance with the ISDS regulations. Pipe type and size, burial requirements, septic tank construction, and other specifications, which are not depicted in our report, are to conform to the requirements of the ISDS regulations. The installer of the system is to have demonstrated knowledge of the APEHD ISDS regulations and requirements. If there are questions or if we can be of further assistance, please call. The project manager is Tim Petz. CHURCH & Associates Edward O. Church, P.E. EOC/trp/erb �00, 0�G!sr 2 copies sent, via Fed Ex, copy to APEHD via Fed Ex 35 ACRES HANULA RESIDENCE SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 10 SOL RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6TH P PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO 651 SF OF INFILTRATIVE 1 AREA IN THREE GRAVELLESS ' TRENCHES. EACH TRENCH MUST HAVE ONE ROW OF 14 CHAMBERS. 1 I 1 1 I 1 JOB NO. 12923W 54' PI OF • � %,�' o ��� 7540 P y p^ s� o i5 ,{PROFjj,l- ! d 7560el r� i 7570 f 1�OS I/ C RE E � X f •I 1 CLEANOUT IE15LAN, LOCATION OF TION HOLES, AND LOCATION OF PROPOSED OWS t • /'°��, f 7580 ONE 1500 -GALLON 1 TWO=COMPART NT,PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK WITH AN WEI�L. EFFLUENT FITLER ON THE OUTLET NOTE: SEPTIC TANK MUST BE 54 FEET FROM WELL DRAIN FIELD MUST BE 104+ FEET FROM WELL SCALE 1"=30 5/11/01 FIGURE 1 TYPICAL PLAN VIEW 4" SDR 35 PERF( PLACED ON GROU TO MANUFACTURE 4" SDR 35 PVC OBSERVATION/VENT PIl TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION - N.T.S. ACKFI LL 4' 4" SDR 35 PVC OBSERVATION /VENT PIPE WITH CAP EXTENT OF EXCAVATION TOTAL — THREE TRENCHES MIN.—� SLOPE F-� ORAIA/q 1.5' MIN GE _ GRAVELLESS CHAMBER 3' BY 6.25' CALCULATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN CRITERIA RESIDENCE — 3 BEDROOMS, 2000-6000 SF LOADING — 100 GAL/DAY/PERSON TOTAL LOADING — 600 GPD PERCOLATION TEST — 38 MPI AREA — (1.75 X q X 4T)/5 AREA — 1295 SF REDUCTION FOR USE OF CHAMBER—TRENCHES — 50% TOTAL AREA — 647.5 SF 1 FfAW SMXr= BAM FOR GRAVITY FLOW EFFLUENT TOP EFFLUENT INLET (1/8- PER FOOT DROP) \1+10W SPLITTER BASIN To FEW s, D FIELD /2 TaeB;C3LAM LID Wrrl SrAP&M STEEL. -8(X19 & URET1i VVE GiASKEr. ommmwF -FWMM PVC SAM PM DOCFIA TGE WE EFFLUIEIYr DISCHARGE, G]t oR(MWET STALL LIVALE r I 4• PVC INFLUENT ROM DOSING} TAMC sm vmw TRENCH SPECIFICATIONS TREATMENT UNIT SPECIFICATIONS NUMBER OF TRENCHES - 3 TOTAL CAPACITY - 1.75 X q X (30 HOURS/24 HOURS) _ LENGTH OF EACH TRENCH - 87.5 FEET, 14 CHAMBERS 1312.5 GALLONS WIDTH OF EACH TRENCH - 3 FEET, 1 CHAMBERS RECOMMENDATION - ONE 1500 -GALLON, TWO-COMPARTMENT, TOTAL NUMBER OF CHAMBERS - 42 CHAMBERS PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK WITH AN EFFLUENT FILTER ON TOTAL AREA - 651 SF THE OUTLET. DRAIN FIELD DETAILS 5/11/01 ■ N co L C W D CD �I M_0 I i W a_ 0 C— co F— CD rti U) V U3CL '— LU L— I N Z W z W •3`� [I- O CD Ki ZZ � U �� cm •; v+ I �z Z 0 Lq • i vE n G] v ~ v C Q_ ao N m J N Ol> E— N v ■ N co L C W D CD �I M_0 I i W a_ 0 C— co F— CD rti U) V U3CL '— LU L— I N Z N I •3`� [I- O CD Ki = LU U Q) •; v+ o � l� Z 0 C v vE L Q ~ v C LJi O J N Ol> E— N v O rn O O � 0= •N % y m U p 'p = U On N p N N -C s 0 CD w- v t Na O m (V U 3: o v vLy v m a_ N/1 O_ U O Oo U tCD D v_, - o` C N CL 0 _v � O E s v p (n n LU t` { ,, a- Li (n d v CD cn LU a >, j W v' H '— LU L— I N Z I I N [I- O W Ki = LU 1 H Q) 0 L O Q.� l� Z 0 n, TT— p m s +• Q ~ v C LJi C> }— O J LL- uj � 1fif - ¢ L - � O E s v p (n n LU t` { ,, a- ,. cn LU a >, j v ELLJ v' Its F— Oi 3 o0 0 V ) i U ¢ u U E Z J O i LU '— LU L— I N I I N [I- O 3 Ki = LU 1 H Q) 0 L O Q.� l� Z 0 n, TT— p m s +• i LU '— LU L— I a� It [I- O 3 Ki = 1 H Q) 0 L O Q.� O Z 0 ¢ ~ p m s +• Q ~ v C c? w C> }— O J Lf) LL U Z_ = fn H g C:)cnw r LU O v Z U W Z Q' O W Ws aCo of � U S (33: cr �Z O � W O Z 2 W F CD ww U) ? (D J W U 0 O O O a- LO rl) Lci N rn ti � c LO C N � C y f7 Ll T C' (n M �N+ C:) N C Z cn m � t� © 0 Profile: A TABLE 1 - PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS Hanula Residence DATE OF TEST: 4128/01 Pitkin County, Colorado fnnt Aaarrintinn 0 - 1.5 Topsoil, sand 1.5 - 8 Sand, clayey, slightly siity,with gravel and boulders, moist, red NO GROUND WATER WAS ENCOUNTERED WITHIN THE EXCAVATION DEPTH TIME DEPTH DEPTH INTERVAL HOLE HOLE OF CHANGE, PERC PERC. NUMBER HOLE, INTERVAL START, END, (INCHES) RATE RATE, ,�•�r���� (MINUTES) (INCHES) (INCHES) Impil Impli Job No. 12923W �- Job No. 12923W Profile: TAbL 1 - PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS Hanula Residence DATE OF TEST: 4/28/01 Pitkin County, Colorado feet description 0 - 1.5 ITopsoil, sand 1.5 - 8 Sand, clayey, slightly silt ,with gravel and boulders, moist, red NO GROUND WATER WAS ENCOUNTERED WITHIN THE EXCAVATION DEPTH INTERVAL HOLE TIME DEPTH DEPTH 10 HOLE OF CHANGE, PERC PERC. INTERVAL START, END, 6.50 NUMBER HOLE, (INCHES) RATE RATE, (MINUTES) (INCHES) /IAI[_uFSI (INCHES) Impil IMpil 10 17.25 10 10.13 14.63 4.50 2 10 11.00 15.13 4.13 2 10 6.50 10.00 3.50 3 10 10.00 12.75 2.75 4 10 12.75 14.50 1.75 6 10 8.38 10.50 2.13 5 10 10.50 11.68 1.18 9 10 11.63 12.50 0.88 11 10 12.50 1 13.13 1 0.63 16 16 Job No. 12923W Robert Hanula, 11:50 AM 05/18/2001, Re: Septic Approval To: etrove@webtv.net (Robert Hanula) From: Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Re: Septic Approval Cc: Bcc: Attached: I reviewed the latest design late yesterday afternoon. They still had a typo on the first page of the May 11, 2001 design letter but faxed me a revised page this morning. Please note that the design is for a 1,500 gallon septic tank, not a 1,750 gallon tank, though the larger tank can be used. So I am ready to issue the hard copy of the septic permit this afternoon. Then I will be able later this afternoon to sign off on the building permit for you for our department. At 09:12 AM 05/17/2001 , you wrote: Hi Nancy, I understand that Tim Petz has submitted answers to your questions. Do you have the information to approve the septic system and design? Please let me know when you believe you will make your decision. Thank you, Bob Hanula Printed for Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> --- RECEIVED ASPEN ITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPART)T ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS MAY 14 2001 PITKIN COUNT' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Owner's Name FIANU - Parcel ID # House Size (sq. f) 2 (75 gPd, 100gPd, or 130 d) 100 Number of Bedrooms in Main House Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit (If the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house.) Average Daily Waste Flow 600 State Review Required? no Perc Rate 38`; (T) Design Flow (Q) = # potential bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 1050 Absorptior Area (A= Q/5 X SQRT) A= 1295 sq. ft. of absorption area required 84 infiltrator units without reduction A maximum 50% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system, only if the lot size and soil conditions are optimal. If a reduction is being proposed, describe why lot size and soil conditions are optimal: GOOD SOIL CONDITIONS AND PROPOSING TRENCHES A = i647 sq.ft. with reduction 42 infiltrator units with reduction Type of system: []Absorption trenches DAbsorp on bed [X] Gravelless chambers []Dry well []Seepage Pit []Other Minimum tank capacity 1313 gallons SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 104 SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet = SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = FINAL INSPECTION BY: DATE: Engineer's Submittal for Septic Permit in Pitkin County Owner's Last Name: HANULA Location 1424 BOBCAT LANE, IZEDSTONE Summary of information regarding new septic system: Type of system being proposed: GRAVELLESS CHAMBERS Other treatment processes being used: EFFLUENT FILTER Does the system use any mechanical parts? (Prohibited unless there is no alternative)NO If yes, explain why there are no alternatives Does the system require any maintenance other than routine pumping? YES If yes, who will do the maintenance? CLEAN FILTER WHEN SEPTIC TANK IS PUMPED Are any reductions being proposed? YES If yes, what makes the lot and soil conditions optimal? GOOD PERCOLATION RATES AND PROPOSING TRENCHES Which of the following are on the site or within setbacks? Closest distance of septic system to each feature [] 100 year floodplain N/A [X] well(s) 104 FEET [] irrigation ditches N/A [] streams N/A [] ponds N/A [] other features NA What was the profile hole depth? 8 FEET What is the depth to groundwater? What is the depth to bedrock? NLA. What assumptions, if any, were made in system sizing and design? (include any local, site- specific data, such as months without snow cover, ratio of evaporation to absorption, etc. that are relevant.) If there are any variations from normal design, please explain how they can be demonstrated to improve treatment and protect water quality. NONE Tamara Pregl, 10:52 AM 05/1 W`4" 01 , Re: Aspen Valley Vet Hospital `% Page 1 of 1 Afto� "00 X -Sender: tamarap@comdev X -Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:52:50 -0600 To: Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> From: Tamara Pregl <tamarap@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Re: Aspen Valley Vet Hospital Nancy, Dr. G. is moving his business downvalley as soon as possible. He has the property up for sale as a single-family residence. I have told that he should make the next property owners aware of the septic issues if he is not going to take care of it before he moves. Call me if you have any other questions. Tamara At 01:06 PM 5/14/01 -0600, you wrote: just found this one again in our pending file. Nothing has been done on it. Dr. Gomez has not submitted an application to us, though a note from the engineer he had given Gomez the design last December. It is up to the owner to submit to, the engineers don't usually want to be involved at that stage. Nancy MacKenzie Pitkin County Environmental Health X5076 Printed for Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> 05/18/2001 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, GRANTING APPROVAL FOR THE REINSTATEMENT OF VESTED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS TO DANIEL CHRISTMAS Resolution No. 99 --Z% RECITALS Daniel Christmas ("Applicant") has applied tothe Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners (`BOCC") to consider an extension of vested real property rights pursuant to Section 4-140.30 of the Land Use Code. 2. The property is located adjacent to the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision, south of the bwn of Redstone, and is more specifically described in the attached Exhibit "A." The property is zoned RS -30 and contains approximately 36 acres. 4. The BOCC heard this application at a duly noticed public hearing on April 14, 1999, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to this application. The BOCC has determined that the proposed development meets the criteria established in Section 4-140-30 of the Land Use Code, however, the BOCC has determined that the applicant's request is in fact a reinstatement of vested property rights and shall be noted as such. The BOCC has found that the reinstatement of vested property righu i� appropriate and the request for an extension is considered effectively a request for reinstatement. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners that it does hereby grant a reinstatement of vested property rights to the Christmas property, subject to the following conditions which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: 1. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the application and in the public meetings. 2. The conditions of this resolution shall replace all conditions of approval established in BOCC Resolution No. 96-5. Wildfire mitigation shall be as follows: Defensible Space: A. The area around the structure shall incorporate landscaping with wildfire defensible space considerations as. follows: NOTE: Actual vegetation manipulation to meet these conditions may not be necessary where the natural vegetation patterns have already fulfilled these conditions. 111111 IIT 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IN 430753 05/06/1999 01:25P RESOLll 1 DAVIS SILVI I ,.r 7 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Resolution No. 99-f—/ Page 2 Brush, debris, and non -ornamental vegetation shall be removed within a minimum 10 foot perimeter around all structures. Vegetation in this area shall be at 6" or less (i.e. mowed grass, low -growing perennials). No vegetation taller than 6" shall be planted in this area. 2. Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the vertical and horizontal continuity of the fuels a minimum of a 30 foot perimeter around a structure built on flat ground. Spacing and thinning of existing vegetation within the 30 foot up hill and to the sides and 37 feet downhill shall be a m nima oft% times the hcigla of he fuel. Maximum diameter of the clumps shall be two times the height of the fuel. All measurements shall be from the edges of the crowns of the fuel. 4. All branches from trees and brush within the 30 foot perimeter shall be pruned to a height of 10 feet above the ground and removal of ladder fuels from around trees and brush. Tree crown separation within the 30 foot perimeter shall have a minimum of 10 feet between the edges of the crowns. This does not apply to mature stands of Aspen trees where the above recommendation for removal of ladder fuels have been compiled with. In areas of aspen regeneration, the spacing guidelines shall be followed. All branches which extend over the roof eaves shall be trimmed and all branches within 15 feet of the chimneys shall be removed. The density of fuel within ? '00 foot perimeter of the structures shall be reduced where natural reduction has not already occurred. 8. All deadfall within the 100 foot perimeter shall be removed. 9. The Applicant shall be responsible for the continued maintenance of the defensible space vegetation requirements. Structural Desian and Construction Requirements: A. Roof construction shall be Class A, non-combustible (no wood shake/shingles) material with no flat roofs. B. All vents shall be screened with corrosive resistant wire mesh of one quarter inch maximum. C. Projections (Heat Traps): Projections at the roof line (which include but are not limited to eaves, cornices, soffits and roofs over open decks) shall be sheathed with materials approved for 1 hour fire -resistive construction. For projections below the roof line (which include but are not limited to exterior balconies, decks, porches, cantilevered floor projections, and bay windows) the open space between grade and the underside of projections below the roof line 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IN 430753 05/06/1999 01:25P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI - -.. - w wn u a MM OTTWTN MUNTY CO Resolution No. 99- '71 Page 3 shall be enclosed by solid, vertical walls. These walls shall be constructed with materials approved for 1 hour fire -resistive construction on the exterior side of the wall and shall extend from the top of grade to the underside of the floor decking or walls of the projection. An alternative construction method for'such projections would require use of totally noncombustible building materials. Areas below such projections shall be void of vegetative or other combustible materials. These areas below projections shall be protected from accumulation of vegetative materials by placement of a vegetative barrier covered with rocks or gravel or by coverage with concrete or stone. There shall be no storage of combustible materials under projections. The walls underneath projections shall be constructed with materials approved for 1 hour fire -resistive construction on the exterior side of the wall. Window openings in walls below projections shall be tempered glass. Doors shall be noncombustible or 1 3/4" solid wood. When the projection is located and constricted so that the structure or any portion thereof projects over a descending slope surface.. the area below the structure shall have all underfloor areas enclosed to the ground, with exterior walls constructed with materials approved for one hour fire -resistive constriction on the exterior side of the wall. D. Windows and Glass: Glazed openings shall be provided with close -able, solid. exterior non-flammable shutters or shall be tempered glass. E. Exterior Walls and Siding: Siding and exterior wall construction shall have a minimum 1 hour fire -resistive rating ground level to roof line. Exterior doors shall be noncombustible or 13/4" solid wood. F. Foundations: Foundations, skirting and crawl space openings shall be fully enclosed and constructed with materials approved for 1 hour fire -resistive construction on the exterior side of the walls and shall extend from the top of grade to the underside of the floor decking or walls. G. Stilt Construction: The underside of decks and structures with stilt foundations shall be fully enclosed and constructed with materials approved for 1 hour fire -resistive construction on the exterior side of the walls and shall extend from the'top of grade to the underside of the floor decking or walls. Maintenance: A. Roofs and gutters shall be kep', dear of debris. B. Yards shall be kept clear of all litter, slash, and flammable debris. C. All flammable materials shall be stored on a parallel contour a minimum of 15' from any structures. 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IN 30753 05/06/1999 01:25P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILV 3 of 7 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO i 'Resolution No. 99--2 Page 4 D. Weeds and grasses within the 10' perimeter shall be maintained to a height no more than 6 inches. Miscellaneous: A. Firewood shall be stacked on a parallel contour a minimum of 15 feet away from any structure. B. Propane tanks shall be installed according to NFPA 48 standards and on a contour away from the structure with standard defensible space vegetation mitigation around any above- ground tank. Any wood enclosures around the tank shall be constructed with materials approved for 2 hour fire -resistive construction on the exterior side of the walls. C. Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris. D. Wood fences shall not be connected to the structure. E. Fuel tanks shall be installed underground with an approved container. F. Each structure shall have a minimum of one 10 lb. ABC fire extinguisher. G. Addresses shall be clearly marked and visible with minimum 2" non-combustible letters and shall be visible and installed on a non-combustible post. H. Any outbuildings or additional buildings shall adhere to the same standards as structures. Access: A. Access roads shall be built to County Standards. Utilities: A. Utility lines shall be buried. 4. Outside illumination shall comply with County lighting standards in effect at the timeof building permit issuance. 5. The Applicant shall comply with the following wildlife mitigation measures: a. Fencing shall comply with the Pitkin County fencing requirements. b. All garbage/trash shall be kept within bear -proof garbage containers. C. Dogs are prohibited. d. All structures shall be setback from the edge of the bench so they are not visible from Kline Creek. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 430753 05/06/1999 01:25P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI A „r i n a as e a as N 222 PITKIN COUNTY CO Resolution No. 99-2 Page 5 The Applicant shall comply with the following standards for development on -slopes of greater than 15%: A. Adequate mechanical support shall be provided for cut slopes. B. Adding water which may decrease slope stability shall be avoided. C. Adding weight to the top of the slope shall be avoided. D. Disturbed slopes must be contoured so that they can be revegetated. E. Steepening of existing slopes shall be avoided. F. Confine cuts, f Ils, grading and excavation to�ie minimum area needed for construction. Prior to the submittal of any building permit applications, the Applicant shall obtain a septic permit from the Environmental Health Department. All sewage disposal systems must be designed by a registered professional engineer. Sewage disc s 1 system shall be located within the apizroved building envelope. Prior to the submittal of any building permit applications, the Applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate domestic water supply on the property. In addition. the Applicant shall submit information which documents the location of the well in relation to the proposed septic system. Quantity and quality of said supply shall meet the approval of the Environmental Health Department. The well site shall be located within the approved building envelope. N,o-development, including grading, landscaping (including betrning) and vegetation removal of disturbance shall occur outside the designated building envelope, except for utility and driveway extension and maintenance, and as may be necessary to implement the wildfire mitigation measures required elsewhere in this document. 10. All areas disturbed by construction shall be revegetated with native shrubs and grasses to limit water consumption and additional runoff within one growing season of the project's completion. 11. A fireplace/woodstove application must be filed and approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit (if necessary). 12. Prior to the submittal of any building permit applications,an access permit is required from the County Engineer. 13. Prior to the issuance of an access permit, the Applicant shall submit a road improvement plan to the County Engineer for approval. The improvements shall raise the standard of the road with a minimal amount of environmental damage. 14. The required road improvements shall be completed and approved by the County Engineer; prior to the submittal of any building permit applications. i 111111 I I I A 111111 I I I I 1111111 I I I 1111111 I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I 430753 05/06/1999 01:25P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI L',wvILLUUtu Page 6 15. The Applicant shall participate in the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision Road Improvements District, as it presently exists. if this District is not functioning at this time, le Applicant shall join such an improvements district or association. should one be formed. 16. The Applicant shall comply with the codes and requirements of the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District. 17. The primary residence shall be limited to 1,200 square feet of above grade floor area, as defined in the Pitkin County Land Use Code at the time of building permit issuance. Subgrade space shall be no greater than the footprint of the primary structure. The garage and accessory buildings shall be limited to a cumulative total of 750 square feet of above and/or below grade floor area. 18. Development of 30 inches above or below grade within the required setback requires approval of a variance by the Board of Adjustment. 19. The vested rights for the approval contained herein shall expire on April 14, 2002. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TLNIES ON THE 13TH D:AY OF MARCH 1999. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 14TH DAY OF APRIL 1999. VESTED RIGHTS NOTICE PUBLISHED ON THE DAY OF '1 ' ,1999. ATTEST: D putty Clerk and Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: John Ely, Coun orney Case 9P8-99 PID #2729-293-00-018 cue, n104/06/99 BOCC OF COUNTY CONT,2vIISSIONERS ^PITKIN COUNTY, PLORADO Leslie J. Lamon , Chair _ Date: C APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: 7.99 Cindy Houben, Community Development Director 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 430753 05/06/1999 01:25P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 8 of 7 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO �- 7! Order Number: 00021332-C2 EXHIBIT A IFGAL DESCRIPT70N A parcel of land airuated in the SW 114 of Section 114 of Section 32, "'owrs:ip 10 South, Range 88 nest Pitkin, State of Colorado, being more par a cularly 29, and the N 112 of the ha of the 6th P.Y. , Ccur.:y of described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast Corner of said N :12 NW 114 of Section 32; :hence Westerly along the south line of said N 112 NW 114 750 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Big Kline Creek: thence Northerly along the cense= line o: Big Kline Creek 1,365 feet, more or less, to the North Zine of said N 112 Nw 114; thence Westerly along said North line of said N 112 NU 114 610 fee:, more or less, to the Southeast Corner of a tract of land referred to as Trac No. 6 and particularly described in Warranty Deed recorded in Book 306 at Page 2:1 of the Pitkin County records; thence North along the EashlC�e oofnsais coid incidental 474.29 feet to the Northeast Corner of said Tract 6, P ` with the Southeast Corner of Tract; thence North 22 degrees 46 minutes 43 secods East 764.50 fee: along the Easterly line of said T. act 5 to the n Northeast Corner of said Trac' S which pcint is ccinc_dental with the Southwest Corner of the South end of Bobcat Lane as established and dedicated i.^. the filing of Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision Nc. 3; thence Northeasterly 30 feet along the Southerly end of said lane to the Northeasterly corner Che eeko{thence thence Easterly .310 feet more o: less to the center, of Big ' Southerly along the center line of Big yiine Creek 570 feet, more or less; o: lto the thence North 65 degrees 0 minutes 0 seconds East 1005 feet, more less East line of the S'W 114 of said Section 29; thence South along said East line of Section 29, 1869.5 feet to the point of beginn=ing. n, State of Colorado County of Pi:k.: 1 111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111IN IIII 430f57 8500001090.00 N50.00�PITKINDCOUNTYICOI MEMORANDUM To: Rick Magill, Planning Office From: Lee Cassin, Assistant Environmental Health Director Date: August 29,1995 Re: Christmas 1041 Hazard Review & General Submission Parcel ID # 2729-293-00-018 The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the details of the Christmas 1041 application under the authority of the Pitkin County Land Use Code and has the following comments. This application presents some difficulty for this office, because we would like to encourage a low -impact use such as proposed in this application. However, the home will be in the town of Redstone, where at some times in the building's life, it will undoubtedly be used as a full-time residence. Our comments will try to address both types of use. ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-17 and 3-1104: "It is the policy of the County to insure the availability of a water supply of adequate quality, quantity, pressure and dependability for fire protection and support of a proposed land use prior to approval of the use. The County shall require land uses to hook up to existing public systems if service is available." If the town of Redstone's water system supply lines are close enough, the county policy may require connection to this system. However, the applicant proposes to drill a well, which is likely to provide adequate water for this use. We would like to see the well drilled before the building permit is issued: although a minimum -water -use home would be desirable from the point of view of water conservation, we would be concerned if the lot and house were sold and a new owner had inadequate water. For this reason, we would recommend the well be drilled before the building permit is issued. We will need information on the quantity and the quality of the water once the well is drilled. The quantity can be determined from the well driller's report. The applicant must ensure that the water quality is acceptable by having it tested by a lab such as the Snowmass Water and Sanitation District or Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. Before a septic permit can be issued, the well must be drilled to assure that setback Printed on Recycled Paper C O requirements from the well to the septic system can be maintained. The Pitkin County Land Use Code requires that the well site be within the building envelope. If the building envelope is only 100 ft wide and 270 ft long, this may be a problem, since the well must be 100 ft from the septic system and the septic system must be some distance from the house and property lines. A typical size for a system if the perc rate is good, would be 30 ft by 30 ft - which means if the leach field is 10 ft from the property line and 20 ft from the house and 100 ft from the well, the septic system, house, and well could not be lined up along the narrow dimension of the lot. The house would have to be at least 60 ft from the property line on the side with the septic system, and the well would have to be at least 40 ft from this "far" side of the house. These features can be fitted into such a site, but care will have to be taken in their placement. It is certainly recommended that low water landscaping (xeriscaping) or no landscaping be used. The Colorado State University Cooperative Extension office can be contacted for more information on xeriscaping. A condition of approval for this application is the receipt of information documenting that the location of the well(s) meet setback requirements and can be placed within the building envelope and that quantity/quality of the well water are adequate. Without meeting these requirements a septic permit and building permit should not be issued. SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-18 and 3-1105: "it is the policy of the County to ensure that adequate sewage treatment facilities are available to serve existing and new developments. Public and private sewage disposal systems and connections to such systems shall comply with the sewage disposal guidelines of Pitkin County's Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulation." Please see the above comments about possible difficulties in placing components of the septic system in the building envelope. For a seasonal use cabin such as the one proposed, the county septic regulations allow either a vault privy (not a pit privy as proposed) or a composting toilet, in combination with a gray water system that would be smaller than if all the house's wastes go into a septic system. This will make it easier to fit the system into the building envelope. We recommend the system be large enough to accommodate all of the appliances that are likely to be used in the future. The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department will design the system for the applicant as part of the permit fee (unless an engineered system is required). We will do a site visit, advise the applicant about the best location for the system and provide a system design. We will determine if an engineered system is needed based on soil test results (if any one of the following occurs: a percolation rate faster than 5 mpi or slower than 60 mpi; maximum seasonal level of the groundwater table or bedrock less than four feet below the bottom of the proposed absorption system; or a slope in excess of Printed on Recycled Paper Q 30%). Prior to initiating any tests or studies at the site, the applicant should contact this office in order to avoid unnecessary tests. The area for the leach field should be located in an area of no traffic, planted with dry land grass, and should not be watered. It is desirable to locate the system below the house so that the system can operate by gravity. The applicant should call our office to discuss this site. A condition of approval for this application is the receipt and approval of the septic permit by the Environmental Health Department before a building permit can be issued. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Sections 2-14 and 3-705 and 3-710: "It is the policy of the County to preserve and protect its present water resources. To this end it is the policy of the County that no land use be initiated which would adversely affect the quantity, quality, or accessibility of the County's water resources; or which would occur at the expense of established water -dependent agricultural activities; or which would result in increased salinization of water resources, loss of minimum stream flows, further destruction of wildlife habitat, or major expenditures to reacquire or redistribute major water resources. It is also the policy of the County to maintain a natural vegetative buffer along its surface waters such that the surface and groundwaters of the area are not encroached upon by land uses or other human activities which could cause deterioration of water quality or impair the natural treatment processes provided by meadows and wetlands." The Environmental Health Department will be addressing water quality impacts on down stream water quality. This application is not expected to impact down stream water quality if the minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features are in accordance with the Pitkin County Sewage Regulations. There is no condition of approval for this section. AIR QUALITY: Sections 2-13 and 3-602: "Only that development is permitted which will not contribute significantly to degradation of air quality in Pitkin County. Developments may not constitute an indirect or direct air pollution source under Federal, State or County regulations." This project is not expected to contribute significantly to degradation of air quality in Pitkin County. We commend the applicant for the low -energy -use nature of the proposed home. However, we strongly urge the applicant to use solar energy from the start for lighting especially, and for appliances where possible. It makes no sense from a point of view of air pollution to use propane for lights instead of solar lights, especially at this high altitude location where sunlight is so intense. The applicant must file a fireplace/woodstove permit with the Environmental Health Department before the building permit will be issued. The less densely populated parts of the county like the Redstone area may have two devices per building: a maximum of Printed on Recycled Paper .% Q one wood burning fireplace and a second device which can be either a gas log fireplace or a certified woodstove. In addition, unlimited numbers of decorative gas appliances are allowed. Coal may not be burned in any device. No wood burning device may be installed in barns or agricultural buildings. A condition of approval for this application is the receipt and approval of the fireplace/woodstove permit by the Environmental Health Department before the building permit can be issued. The applicant can minimize air pollution by use of solar lighting and other appliances where feasible. CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS: Section 2-7: "It is the policy of the County to ensure that no use or development of land is permitted which is in violation of the laws of the County, the State of Colorado, or the United States of America." This Department is not aware of any issues of concern regarding other environmental health laws. Printed on Recycled Paper A Gtech June 29, 2000 Manuppella Construction Attn: Scott Manuppella 4890 County Road 115 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 \aof Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No. 100 363 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed Hanula Residence, Northwest Parcel of Christmas Property, Big Kline Creek, Pitkin County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Manuppella: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated April 21, 2000. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Evaluation of potential geologic hazard impacts on the site are beyond the scope of this study. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a single story log structure over a basement level located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. Ground floors are proposed to be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 6 to 8 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The septic disposal system is proposed to be located about 40 feet to the north-northeast of the proposed residence. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The site was vacant at the time of our field work. The ground surface in the building area slopes strongly down to the northwest at grades of about 12%. There is about 6 feet of elevation difference across the proposed building area. Slopes in the building envelope range from 12% to 20%. Vegetation consists of aspen and evergreen trees, brush, grass and weeds. Manuppella Construction June 29, 2000 Page 2 Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits in the building area and one profile pit in the septic disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 to 1'/2 feet of topsoil, consist of medium stiff to stiff clay and sand with scattered gravel, cobbles and boulders to the maximum pit depth of 8 feet. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the clay, presented on Fig. 3, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a low collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. The samples showed moderate compressibility upon increased loading after wetting. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf for support of the proposed residence. The soils tend to compress after wetting and there could be some post -construction foundation settlement. The subgrade should be evaluated for settlement potential at the time of excavation. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for the on-site soil, excluding oversized rock, as backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. The soils tend to compress when wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical H -P GEOTECH Manuppella Construction June 29, 2000 Page 3 movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2 % passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/z feet deep. An impervious membrane such as 20 mil PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in H -P GEOTECH Manuppella Construction June 29, 2000 Page 4 pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 10 feet from the building. Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on June 14, 2000 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig. 2 and consist of about 1'/2 feet of topsoil overlying medium stiff to stiff clay and sand with scattered gravel, cobbles and boulders to the pit depth of 8 feet. The percolation test results are presented in Table II. The percolation tests showed essentially no percolation rate. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, a civil engineer should be engaged to design the septic disposal system. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be H -P GEOTECH Manuppella Construction June 29, 2000 Page 5 notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GE , INC. �o�`p�OADG/ TFC 0 Jordy Z. Adams , Jr , ! ° 297 7; Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. JZA/ksm attachments H -V UEOTECH APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 30' � FA / / BUILDING / ♦ ENVELOPE / ♦ 100 363I HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. m 100 � � r P 1 pP 1 / J p ■ // 1 P 3 / --PROFILE 1 / / PIT 1 oll PIT000l 1 / // ■ 1 � 1 PROPOSED RESIDENCE 1 / I / PIT 2 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / I / / 1 / / / Lr/ - - - - - - - - - - / 110 / 100 EXI STI N G ROAD LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITSI Fig. 1 AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES PIT 1 ELEV. = 99' PIT 2 PROFILE PIT ELEV. = 105' ELEV. = 98' WC=13.3 0 DD=97 '+ wC=11.8 DD=116 —200=41 Li- WC=12.3 I 5 DD=106 CL WC=13.5 D DD=116 —200=49 LL=24 PI=8 PIT 2 PROFILE PIT ELEV. = 105' ELEV. = 98' WC=13.3 DD=97 '+ wC=11.8 DD=116 —200=41 0 5 10 10 _ LEGEND: TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, organic, firm, slightly moist, brown. CLAY AND SAND (CL—SC); silty, scattered gravel, cobbles and boulders, medium stiff to stiff, slightly moist, brown. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on June 13, 2000 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of the exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provid 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve LL = Liquid Limit ( % ) PI = Plasticity Index ( % ) 100 363 HEPWORTH — PAWLAKI LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS I Fig. 2 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 0 0.1 1.0 1 U APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf Moisture Content = 13.3 percent Dry Density = 97 pcf Sample of: Clayey Sand From: Pit 2 at 2 Feet D 1 c 2 O 4 Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 363 tHEPWORTH — PAWLAK SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS GEOTECHNICAL, INC. [IN 100 Fig. 3 Moisture Content = 12.3 percent Dry Density =. 106 pcf Sample of: Clayey Sand with Gravel From: Pit 1 at 4 feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 1 U APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf Moisture Content = 13.3 percent Dry Density = 97 pcf Sample of: Clayey Sand From: Pit 2 at 2 Feet D 1 c 2 O 4 Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 363 tHEPWORTH — PAWLAK SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS GEOTECHNICAL, INC. [IN 100 Fig. 3 U Z J a U_ Z Z U W W 0 Y a J a a CC 0 CL W M M O O_ O Z m O W J m Q J W V) LU 0 Q m 0 m Q J cc Q CG G U) Q) > N c0 > > U co 0 (� i+��' L L O O O c N Q > W cO m c0 CO m Cj) U U U a>i � >- >, c T cc co U cn U cn ° > x W r z z W LL 9L ¢ LL U o r Z O N � U U x in O OO F a 2 — a C7 w s W ° ~ y V N J � W Z N > Q N y i CL z ° Z� z N O Q O a Q s- ° m co > — ° z CY) LO r N zM a 'o o — N (� z i U e— 2 — a z W = o ° F a U O J W CL a a r- N N HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICI L, INC. TABLE II PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 100 363 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MINJINCH) P-1 41 15 7 7 0 did not perc 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 P-2 43 15 6 6 0 did not perc 6 6 0 6 6 0 6 6 0 6 6 0 6 6 0 6 6 0 6 6 0 P-3 43 15 6 5 1 90 5 4 '/z '/z 4 '/z 4 '/z 4 4 0 4 4 0 4 4 0 4 4 0 4 3 '/_ '/Z Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on June 13, 2000. Percolation tests were conducted on June 14, 2000. The average percolation rate for P-3 was based on the last 3 readings of the test. 0 %00 ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT ISDS DESIGN CALCULATIONS Owner's Name j000ta �� � �,' 0 Parcel ID # House Size (sq. ft.) t (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 100 Number of Bedrooms in Main House Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Stud' , Similar ized Rooms in Caretaker Unit (If the caretaker unit 01ATTACHED, eat as if part of main house.) Average Daily W to Flow 600 State Review quired? o Perc Rate (T) Design Flow ( �`,J:0 potential be ooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q=50 Absorption Area (=Q/5 X SQRT perc rate) A = 1242.3768 sq. ft. of absorption area required 80 gravelless chamber units without reduction # of Perc Holes Required: 3 1 in every soil type? Spaced uniformly over proposed area? A maximum 30% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system, only if the lot size and soil conditions are optimal. If a reduction is being proposed, describe why lot size and soil conditions are optimal: A = 869.66373 sq.ft. with reduction 56 gravelless chamber units with reduction Type of system: []Absorption trenches []Absorption bed [] Gravelless chambers []Dry well []Seepage Pit []Other (type) Minimum tank capacity 1312.5 gallons SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 104 SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # of feet = 54 SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = 29 Printed on Recycled Paper Order Number: 00026620 ® SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIP77ON A parcel of land situated in the SW 1/4 of Section 29, and the N 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of Section 32, Township 10 South, Range 88 West of the 6th P.M., County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast Corner of said N 1/2 NW 1/4 of Section 32; thence Westerly along the South line of said N 1/2 NW 1/4 750 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Big Kline Creek: thence Northerly along the center Zine of Big Kline Creek 1,365 feet, more or less, to the North Zine of said N 1/2 NW 1/4; thence Westerly along said North Zine of said N 1/2 NW 1/4 610 feet, more or less, to the Southeast Corner of a tract of land referred to as Tract No. 6 and particularly described in Warranty Deed recorded in Book 306 at Page 811 of the Pitkin County records; thence North along the East line of said Tract 6, 474.29 feet to the Northeast Corner of said Tract 6, which point is coincidental with the Southeast Corner of Tract; thence North 22 degrees 46 minutes 43 seconds East 164.50 feet along the Easterly line of said Tract 5 to the Northeast Corner of said Tract 5 which point is coincidental with the Southwest Corner of the South end of Bobcat Lane as established and dedicated in the filing of Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision No. 3; thence Northeasterly 30 feet along the Southerly end of said lane to the Northeasterly corner thereof; thence Easterly 310 feet more or less to the center of Big Kline Creek; thence Southerly along the center line of Big Kline Creek 570 feet, more or less; thence North 65 degrees 0 minutes 0 seconds East 1005 feet, more or less to the East line of the SW 1/4 of said Section 29; thence South along said East line of Section 29, 1869.5 feet to the point of beginning. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado In 100%� Page 1 of 1 To: "'Nancy MacKenzie... <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: RE: Hanula -again & again & again (and Florida) I understand, I was told <2000SF also. I hope you were not put on the spot yesterday, ie. the conference call. I will look at our options. thanks, SAY HI TO FLORIDA!!!! -----Original Message ----- From: Nancy MacKenzie [mailto:nancym@ci.aspen.co.us] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 20013:53 PM To: Tim Petz Subject: Hanula -again & again & again I never really looked at your design lately, until I saw it was within the building envelope. But now I did and saw that it was designed for a house of less than 2,000 sq ft. and the house is over 2,000 sq ft. My notes indicate that I told Mark this back in August of 2000. I think that was when it was designed for the first location on top by the house. Nancy MacKenzie Pitkin County Environmental Health X5076 Printed for Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> 02/12/2001 Tim Petz, 03:53 PM 01/31/2001, Hanula -again & again & again To: Tim Petz <tpetz@geo-church.com> From: Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Hanula -again & again & again Cc: Bcc: Attached: I never really looked at your design lately, until I saw it was within the building envelope. But now I did and saw that it was designed for a house of less than 2,000 sq ft. and the house is over 2,000 sq ft. My notes indicate that I told Mark this back in August of 2000. 1 think that was when it was designed for the first location on top by the house. Printed for Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> brianm, 02:50 PM 01/25/2001, Hanula Minor Amend. To: brianm From: Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Hanula Minor Amend. Cc: Tim Bcc: Attached: Re: Bob & Darlene Hanula 1424 Bob Cat Lane I just took a look at this. The engineer design for the septic field in the new location is not completely within the proposed new septic envelope. The septic field is designed to start lower in the envelope and extend below the envelope. I called Jeff at Manuppella and he is going to check into it. So just wanted to alert you that you might be getting a call. Printed for Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> • merLinK Everything you need to build your dream rj Manuppella Enterprises, Inc. Amerlink Log Homes Western Division 7800 Highway 82, Suite 106 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-0886 12/12/00 Pitkin County Community Development Brian McNellis 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Co 81611 Re: Mucor Amendment to a Development Pennit 1424 Bobcat Lane, above Redstone Ranch Acres Dear Mr. McNellis, I am writing to you today concerning the Hanula's application for a minor amendment to their development pennit. The Hanula's are requesting an accessory building envelope for a septic system. The current building envelope is not adequately sized to allow enough room for the home, well, and septic system. The current space on the site for the septic system is extremely small, and its perk tests were extremely poor. As a result, the engineered septic system that would be required to adequately handle this home would take up the entire building envelope. We are there for proposing to add to the existing building envelope for the use of a septic system leach field only. The new proposed septic area has perked extremely well, and we will be able to use a conventional septic system. We are proposing to dig trenches between the existing aspens on the site. As a result damage to the site will be at a minimum. By changing and amending die development pennit we will not be changing the proposed development. This property is still proposed as a single-family residence. The amendment is consistent with action taken during the review of the original development and does not constitute a new land activity. The proposed septic leach field will not change the character of the approved land use. It will also not change the vises l appearance of the site. There will be no off site impacts to surrounding neighbors, and it will not endanger the public health, safety or welfare. It will not violate any land use codes, and will not increase or effect on-site parking, utilities, or affordable housing generation. It will also have no impact on the floor area of the home, and it will not decrease [lie open space on the site at all. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns regarding this proposed amendment or application. Sincerely, 7 Scott Manuppella UtC. 13. 1000 4.�6Nl1� f'1 V COUNTY PUBLiC WORKS NO, 6511 P. 1 PITSIN COUNTY WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT Brian McNellis Pitkin County Community Development Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Brian: I visited the Haanula ptaperty with Maris Jaff ry to evaluate any potential ecological impacts resulting from the relovmbon of the septic system as proposed by Mt. Jaffrey. I found that no significant impact will result from this modification. If you have any questions, please give me a call, muk Jaffrey sifta y, C:i- owsky Wildlife Biologist 76 SERVICE CENTER RD 0 ASPEN, CO 0 81611 PHONE: 970.920.5395 0 FAX: 970.920.5374 JONATHANCCO.PITKIN.CO.US Robert & Darlene Hanula 11123 N. 106th St. Scottsdale, AZ 85259 (480) 860-4132 (hm) (602) 207-2899 (wk) October 19, 2000 Scott Manuppella Manuppella Construction 7800 Hwy. 82, Ste 106 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Subject: Authorization of Representative for Hanula Residence at 1424 Bobcat Lane, Redstone, CO. Re: Building Permit No 1832.2000 Dear Scott: As owners of the property at 1424 Bobcat Lane, Redstone Colorado in Pitkin County, we (the undersigned) hereby appoint you to act as our representative and to act in our behalf in obtaining the Minor Amendment to the Development Permit to designate an accessory building envelope for a septic system. You and only you are authorized to execute and deliver to Pitkin County officials all necessary applications and submittals, to meet with Pitkin County officials and to take whatever action you deem necessary to obtain the Minor Amendment to Development Permit. Please personally acknowledge your acceptance of this appointment and fax a copy to us. Sincerely, Robert W. HaQ.�'J nul Darlene Hanula Accented Date: FROM : CACTUS ROSE August 2, 2000 FAX NO. : 9709450789 Aug. 02 2000 12:45PM P1 WESTERN SLOPE TREE SALES Manupella Construction Permit #216324 Robert H. Anula 24 Hour Test Results: Static level Well depth Pump depth Pump size Pumping level Pumping rate PUMP DIVISION 45755 HWY. 6&24 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 (970) 945-1014 (970) 948-4044 140 ft. 700 ft. 680 ft. 3 hp 7 gpm Aermotor 422 ft. 9.8 gpm Test performed by WSTS Pump Division. This well is more than adequate to provide ample water to a single family residence. The water quality was sent to Grand Junction Labs on 7-29-00 for analysis. Testing has not yet been completed. Bill Collins WSTS, Pump Division Form STATE OF COLORAC No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GWS -11 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, CO 80203 4/99 (303) 866-3581 Fax (303) 866-3589 CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP/ADDRESS CORRECTION OF THE WELL LOCATION Insert the Well Permit Number 0- 1 c0 3 a Name address and phone of the person claiming ownership of the well: NAME(S) -!RohRr �- Zor- 2 1Aorvu)O. Mailing Address f. O 'f o I( ;� `7 � City, St. zip CQ rbc,,., Phone ( 9-10 1 --10 -A ^ q (g G715.__ _ Fc fice Use Only If your well has an absolute water right, decreed by the court and the well is not registered with the State Engineer, Enter the Water Court Case Number / Civil Action Number and well number as decreed. This form is filed by the named individual/entity claiming that they are the owner of the well permitted as referenced above. This filing is made pursuant to C.R.S. 37-90-143. 1 WELL LOCATION: County Owner's Well Designation (Address) (Ulty) kciia►v) kz-lNj SE 1 /4 of theS vJ 1 /4, Sec. 29 ,Twp. © ❑ N. or L/�s., Range ❑ E. or 0W., � -1 P.M. Distance from Section Lines 54 O Ft. From ❑ N. or IX S., I ` IC5 Ft. From ❑ E. or Jew W. Line. Subdivision Name _ Lot , Block , Filing/Unit The above listed owner(s) say(s) thi3t he she (they) own the well described herein. The existing record is being amended for the following reasons:, hange in name of owner ❑ Change in mailing address I ❑ Correction of location for exempt wells permitted prior to May 8, 1972 and non-exempt wells permitted after May 17, 1965. Please see the reverse side for further information regarding correction of the well location. I (we) claim and say that I (we) (are) the owner(s) of the well described above and that the commencement of extraction of ground water from this well, lawfully made under the well permit, occurred on the date indicated, and that the statements made herein are true to my (our) knowledge. Please print the Signer's Name & Title Signa re(s) of the w owner. I Date k\ CL co�) OA ff e responsibility of the new owner of this well to complete and sign the form. Signatures of agents are acceptable if anal letter of agency signed by the owner is attached to the form upon its receipt. State Engineer LZE For Office Use Only Date Pitkin County Environmental Health Department 0405 Castle Creek Rd Suite 10, Aspen, CO 81611 FAX/MEMO [IL] QII Phone: Fax Phone: CC: Scott Maneppella 945-0886 Tim Petz, Church & Assoc IREMARKS: ❑ Urgent ❑ For your review RE: HANULA Dear Scott, Date: 4/23/01 Number of pages including cover sheet: 3 FROM: Phone: Fax Phone: E-mail: Nancy MacKenzie 970-920-5076 970-920-5077 )en.co.us ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please Comment The owner has called me and questioned why we have not issued a septic permit so that he can get his building permit. I explained that we needed new soil data from the new location of the field before the engineer could issue a final design to our department. We need this final design before we can issue an ISDS permit and before we can sign off on the Building Permit for this project. Percolation tests must be evenly distributed throughout the area of the field. The original tests are outside the area of the proposed field, and there is a wide range in percolation rates, from 12 mpi to 80 mpi. I have stated several times that new soil data is required. See attached. ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone (970) 920-5090 FAX (970) 920-5439 MEMORANDUM TO: Attorney Zoning Wildlife Biologist Environmental Health FROM: Brian McNellis, Community Development RE: Hanula Minor Amendment to a Development Permit (Case# P189-00 PID# 2729-293-00-018) DATE: February 27, 2001 Attached are application materials for your review and comments. This application will be reviewed by the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Administrator, Cindy Houben Please return your comments to me by March 27, 2001. PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION MATERIALS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IF YOU HAVE NO FURTHER NEED OF THEM. Thank you. �* 3/a- -5/0 / 23 /;1- U A t RECEIVED MAR I .� PITKIN COUNTY' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH In To: "'Nancy MacKenzie"' <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: RE: Hanula thanks for the info Nancy! TIM -----Original Message ----- From: Nancy MacKenzie [mailto,•nancym@c.aspen.co.us) Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 8:38 AM To: Tim Petz Subject: Re: Hanula I talked to Mark J. yesterday. He said that the whale system has been redesigned and is in a new area and that you were sending me a new design. I don't know the location of the new design. I told him that we would not accept it if the soil data was not from the location of the new design. New soil data would have to occur after April 15 (or later since that area does not get good sun exposure.) At 09:07 AM 02/27/2001 , you wrote: >Can you briefly fill me in on the Hanula situation. I was going to send you >the latest report. Do I need to write a letter discussing percolation areas >and rates. Help...... >Thanks again. >TIM Nancy MacKenzie Pitkin County Environmental Health X5076 Printed for Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> Page 1 of 1 02/28/2001 MM ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone (970) 920-5090 FAX (970) 920-5439 MEMORANDUM TO: County Attorney Zoning Wildlife Biologist Environmental Health FROM: Ta �r .' Commun ty Development ��-� Hanula Minor Amendment to Development Permit RE: p P189-00 DATE: January 9, 2001 Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application by Bab Hanula. Please return your comments to me by January 30, 2001. PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION MATERIALS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IF YOU HAVE NO FURTHER NEED OF THEM. Thank you. Air MEMORANDUM To: Rick Magill, Planning Office From: Lee Cassin, Assistant Environmental Health Director Date: August 29,1995. Re: Christmas 1041• Hazard Review &. General Submission Parcel ID.# 2729-293-00-018 The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has'reviewed the details of the Christmas 1041 application under the. authority., of the Pitkin County Land Use Code and has the following comments. This application presents some difficulty for this " office, because we would like to encourage a low -impact use such as proposed in this .application. However; the home will be in the town -of Redstone, whereat some times in the building's life, it will undoubtedly be used as a full-time residence. Otir comments will try to address both types of use, . ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-17 and 3=1104: "It is the policy of the County to insure the availability of a water supply of adequate quality; quantity, pressure and dependability. for fire protection and support of a. proposed land use prior to approval of the use. The County shall require land uses to. hook up. to existing public systems if service is available:" If the town of Redstone's water system supply lines are close enough, the county'policy may require connection to this system. However, the applicant proposes to drilla well, which is likely to provide adequate water for this use. We would like to see the well drilled before the building permit is issued: although,a minimum -water -use home would be desirable from the point of view of water conservation, we would be concerned ifthe lot and house were sold and a new owner had inadequate water. For this reason, we would recommend the well be drilled before the building permit is issued. We.will need information on thequantity and the quality of the water once the well is drilled, The quantity can be determined from the well driller's report. The applicant must ensurethat the water quality is acceptable by. having it tested by a, lab such as the Snowmass Water and Sanitation District or Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. Before a septic permit can be issued, the well must be drilled to assure that setback Printed m Recyded Paper requirements from the well to the septic system can be maintained. The Pitkin County Land Use Code requires that the weli.site be within the building envelope. if the building envelope is only 100 ft wide and.270 ft long, this may be a problem, .since the. well "must be 100 ft from the septic system and 'the septic "system must be some distance from the house and property lines. A typical size for. a system if the perc rate,is good, would be 30 ft by 30 ft - which means if the leach field is 10 ft from the property line" and 20 ft from the house and 100 ft from the well, the septic system, house, and well could . not be lined up along the narrow dimension of the lot. The house would have to be at least 60 ft from the property line on the side with the septic system, and the well would have to be at least 40 ft from this "far' side of house. These features can be fitted into such a site, but care will have to be taken in their placement. It is certainly recommended that low water. landscaping (xeriscaping) or no landscaping be used.. The Colorado State University Cooperative Extension office can be contacted "for more information on xeriscaping. A condition of approval for this application_ is the receipt. of information documenting that the location of the well(s) meet setback requirements and can be placed within :the -building envelope" and that quantity/quality of the. well water are adequate. Without meeting these requirements a septic permit and building permit should not be issued. " SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-18 and.3-1105: °itis the policy of the County to ensure that adequate•sewage treatment facilities are available to serve existing and new developments. Public and private sewage disposal systems and connections to sui:h systems shall comply with the sewage disposal guidelines of Pitkin County's Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulation:" Please see, the above comments about possible difficulties in placing components of the septic system in the building envelope. For a seasonal use cabin such as the one proposed, the -county septic regulations allow either a vault privy (not.a pit privy as proposed) or a composting toilet, in combination with a gray water system that would be smaller than if all the house's wastes go into a septic. system. This will make it easier 'to fit the system into the.building envelope. 'We recommend the system be large enough to accommodate all of the appliances that are likely to be used in the future. The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department will design the, system for the applicant as part of the permit fee (unless an engineered- system is required). We will do a site visit, advise the applicant about the best location for the system and provide a System design: We will determine if an:engineered system is needed based.on soil,test iresults (if any one "of the. following occurs: a percolationrate faster than 5 mpi or slower `than 60.mpi; maximum seasonal level of the groundwater table or bedrock less than four feet below the bottom of the proposed absorption system; or a slope in excess of Printed on Recycled Paper 30%). Prior to initiating any tests or studies at the -site, the applicant should contact this office in order to avoid unnecessary tests. The area for the leach field should be located in an area of rio traffic, planted with dry . land grass, and should not be watered. Itis desirable to locate the system .below the house so that the system can operate by gravity. The applicant should call our office to discuss this site. A condition of approval for this application is the receipt and approval of the septic permit by the Environmental Health Department before a building Permit can be issued. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Sections 2=14 and 3-705 and 3-710: "It is .the policy of the County to preserve and protect its present water resources: To this end it is the policy of the County .that rio land use be initiated which would adversely affect. the quantity, quality, or accessibility of the County's water resources; or which would occur at the expense of established water -dependent agricultural activities; or which would -result in increased salinization of water resources, loss of minimum stream flows, further destruction of wildlife habitat, or major expenditures to reacquire or . redistribute major water, resources: It is also the policy of the County to maintain a natural vegetative buffer along its surface waters such that the surface and groundwaters of the area are not encroached upon by land uses or other human activities which could cause deterioration of water quality or impair the natural treatment processes provided by meadows and wetlands." The Environmental Health Departmentwill be addressing water quality impacts on down stream water quality. This application is not expected to impact down stream water quality if the minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features are in accordance with the Pitkin County Sewage Regulations. There is no condition of 'approval for this section. AIR QUALITY: Sections 2-13 and* 3-602: "Only that development is permitted which will not contribute significantly to degradation of air quality in Pitkin County. Developments may not constitute an indirect or direct air pollution source under Federal, State or County regulations. This project is not expected :to contribute significantly to degradation of air quality in Pitkin County. We:commend the applicant for the low -energy -use nature of the proposed home. However, we strongly urge the applicant, to use solar energy from the start for lighting especially, and, for appliances where possible. It makes no sense from a ' point of view of air pollution to -use propane for lights instead of solar lights, especially at this high altitude location where sunlight is so intense. The applicant must file a fireplace/woodstove permit with the Environmental Health Department before the building permit will be issued. The less densely populated, parts of the county like the Redstone area may have two devices per budding: a maximum of . - PrinEed on Re} yded Paper - - one wood burning fireplace and a second device which can be either a gas log fireplace or a certified woodstove. In addition, unlimited numbers of decorative gas appliances are allowed. Coal may not be burned in Any device. No wood burning device may be" installed in barns or agricultural buildings. A condition of approval for this application is the- receipt and approval of the fireplace/woodstove permit by the Environmental Health Department before the building permit can be issued. The applicant can minimize air pollution by use of solar lighting. and other appliances where feasible. CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS:Section 2-7: "It is the policy of the County to ensure that no use or. development of land is, permitted which is in violation of the laws of the. County, the State of Colorado, or the United States of America." This Department is not aware of any issues of concern regarding other environmental health laws. e Printed on Recycled Paper Brian McNellis, 10:01 AM 04/001 , Hanula minor amendment "" Page 1 of 1 *0660 X -Sender: brianm@comdev X -Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:01:47 -0600 To: nancym@co.piddn.co.us, vickim@co.pitkin.co.us From: Brian McNellis <brianm@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Hanula minor amendment The approval for the septic envelope has been recorded and the site plan has been recorded as well. They are good to pull a permit. Thanks. Printed for Nancy MacKenzie <nancym@ci.aspen.co.us> 04/27/2001 . --,a V_ - Mff UrUnKTM Everything you need to build your dream Manuppella Enterprises, Inc. Amerlink Log Homes Western Division 7800 Highway 82, Suite 106 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-0886 02/19/01 Pitkin County Community Development Brian McNellis 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Co 81611 Re: Minor Amendment to a Development Pennit 1424 Bobcat Lane, above Redstone Ranch Acres Dear Mr. McNellis, I am writing to you today concerning the Hanula's application for a minor amendment to their development permit. We had previously submitted a proposed revised 1041 site map. The Hanula's are requesting an accessory building envelope, which will only be used for a septic system. However, the previously submitted site map included an area for the septic system, which had areas on it that had a slope of 30% or more. As a result, we have therefore, resubmitted another proposed site map with a revision date of 2/15/01, which relocates the newly proposed septic area of the building envelope in an area that has a slope less than 30%. Currently, the only area that is above a 30% grade on the newly revised proposed site map is a 6' wide area, which connects the existing building envelope to the newly proposed septic envelope. This 6' area is to be used for a 4" underground supply line to the septic system only. The current recorded building envelope is not adequately sized to allow enough room for the home, well, and septic system. The current space on the site for the septic system is extremely small, and its perk tests were extremely poor. As a result, the engineered septic system that would be required to adequately handle this home would take up the entire building envelope. We are therefore proposing to add to the existing building envelope for the use of a septic system leach field only. The new proposed septic area has perked extremely well, and we will be able to use a conventional septic system. We are proposing to dig trenches between the existing aspens on the site. As a result damage to the site will be at a minimum. By changing and amending the development pennit we will not be changing the proposed development. This property is still proposed as a single-family residence. The amendment is consistent with action taken during the review of the original development and does not constitute a new land activity. The proposed septic leach field will not change the character of the approved land use. It will also not change the visual appearance of the site. There will be no off site impacts to surrounding neighbors, and it will not endanger the public health, safety or welfare. It will not violate any land use codes, and will not increase or effect on-site parking, utilities, or affordable housing generation. It will also have no impact on the floor area of the home, and it will not decrease the open space on the site at all. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns regarding this proposed Amendment or application. Sin c Scott Manuppella Z Q 2 no W De IW W I y I I C I W 4J Vf�i'J ,'� L' ', •� AC -ZE.5 ..➢jam„-_.__ l i r I O N U a, N !f iNE Cf�t y fC,• ��Y L.yh til/ JI •�I c.1y J � �L I Lr} -�Ylf ��4j G I -- ----------------J-------- --------- ----- --- L -3; I� PSG.• � �'" _�� ,-q µ, T o w FV�I 8 (w4<n- Rv uj �U�Kw�ti3� WI 1W� w uj ¢ 6kWw}x sZ W S <� ad LO���j S� z pS W TWO W Wo F N��OQ 7 (] LnW FO�ZwH w N 1 = dl oz 0gDw I � I�����w 0Kz �� z�6o p �� 0 Q �FoGW� I78 S)F-I �� � < wo -i Z �I�� z i�SW �'�ozo ZF ° 7°°a o�J U- 0 J w� o� a, wg~r w n w J o Jew Q dt �WF ww oc .W� Zz Qi w�1,1r��w w��L,} Iz oo soQl� �ywww OCI D S1 .Q WI1tJ �u ZZL,-�, wWwa�3O0~�� �Z�(1�U1 � wOd�W Wp tt Z' Nj !R %I zW °WZjQ S �WS�LNw� 4,pS O� O�QIJQX Z � S z9w—loco �,c��vo�C }�g J WZ iv Z� } O OI ���ii 5Q <�v H }} o(: 9Qz�oQ�� �wn� z �j Q\��2 �1 }BVI JIII g'i- WLRi .P6i, zP W W 4 �`° ccs zZ p�9 W���d�l�o <p<��zcV�iS��Z�Wo p. Q� to dJ� �� VI gwg—zI �cvF —0�� Ju_ l7 } ? j3� NI ,�SO�W� n3� �- 0L Z W zk Sqp((W Fm �Z I m WV K LU F _�cA < w W� p (1 0 pI = 0 GZ° J V��LL1�3�nz��- .Sz] wwL LLI�OW r �Zln ° W -I< w• N_JW F- wJ�S OL7 ZI W H J a` w w u rZl _�(Si Zod Z~Q w. J Q 3�°z0� =� Z� �UZ3� �Q)0§L([W�T~ °pLlWZ1� 7�, =iW n-�Sl� 4J www Z Z nQ.Q 9 S7WNF-wzOooLu7�l �wv wy� F� w�n7WZ Z �-2-, 8:,< 3 ���� 3 Q w � as ��z— 'Z�Z <3o� F��N�� O v� Qs O o <cv n. mGFZ Y 1 �� --- /4 \ \\ \\ \\ \ Qz 00 --- i I................ I...........ti......... �...........i. . 44 0001 oo 6 009 ooz o0D ooS ooh, li n. 4J Vf�i'J ,'� L' ', •� AC -ZE.5 ..➢jam„-_.__ =-.. _—_-- __ 7 V -z S �( •� ,-q µ, T o w FV�I 8 (w4<n- Rv uj �U�Kw�ti3� WI 1W� w uj ¢ 6kWw}x sZ W S <� ad LO���j S� z pS W TWO W Wo F N��OQ 7 (] LnW FO�ZwH w N 1 = dl oz 0gDw I � I�����w 0Kz �� z�6o p �� 0 Q �FoGW� I78 S)F-I �� � < wo -i Z �I�� z i�SW �'�ozo ZF ° 7°°a o�J U- 0 J w� o� a, wg~r w n w J o Jew Q dt �WF ww oc .W� Zz Qi w�1,1r��w w��L,} Iz oo soQl� �ywww OCI D S1 .Q WI1tJ �u ZZL,-�, wWwa�3O0~�� �Z�(1�U1 � wOd�W Wp tt Z' Nj !R %I zW °WZjQ S �WS�LNw� 4,pS O� O�QIJQX Z � S z9w—loco �,c��vo�C }�g J WZ iv Z� } O OI ���ii 5Q <�v H }} o(: 9Qz�oQ�� �wn� z �j Q\��2 �1 }BVI JIII g'i- WLRi .P6i, zP W W 4 �`° ccs zZ p�9 W���d�l�o <p<��zcV�iS��Z�Wo p. Q� to dJ� �� VI gwg—zI �cvF —0�� Ju_ l7 } ? j3� NI ,�SO�W� n3� �- 0L Z W zk Sqp((W Fm �Z I m WV K LU F _�cA < w W� p (1 0 pI = 0 GZ° J V��LL1�3�nz��- .Sz] wwL LLI�OW r �Zln ° W -I< w• N_JW F- wJ�S OL7 ZI W H J a` w w u rZl _�(Si Zod Z~Q w. J Q 3�°z0� =� Z� �UZ3� �Q)0§L([W�T~ °pLlWZ1� 7�, =iW n-�Sl� 4J www Z Z nQ.Q 9 S7WNF-wzOooLu7�l �wv wy� F� w�n7WZ Z �-2-, 8:,< 3 ���� 3 Q w � as ��z— 'Z�Z <3o� F��N�� O v� Qs O o <cv n. mGFZ Y 1 �� --- /4 \ \\ \\ \\ \ Qz 00 --- i I................ I...........ti......... �...........i. . 44 0001 oo 6 009 ooz o0D ooS ooh, li 1 56 W ■ Iv low 1 56 W ■ HMo " b" Sh'V ti aaau 2W mraip moi ppM o7 paaa Rol 9ap)Ilaq Dl lHow mu sat4agm xUlww" CNV '�Mllilmiv Ao AI%G. W mu 2w wvv aaHl '`LAOIS 0') x.09 NINIIJ -N7NIC Na4Jd r "11* 2KL 'k9a4l anvH TWHG n 1 1 1 a t �/ wJOICNiuC rG111i�.1 aHl �omlltNa a7cNa7n L Il li ll lJ l�.i V aw WO.L%JGHI a 04"i v AG=Now"v QN-W E I 909 �!'dCIaaHl anvN of aadalvm aHl ro u111904o r." ld OS 99b �I734aU G 11 G>MVWa/' Kaa07 WOO WaHLO OWacme al ana aaoO C Wi-N vlCa aHl 'ld 'OS OLII 1N3W3Sd9S SNV-Id 3WOH 90"1 �° AW of GIVL aCiil ,q aa+vlvw°O au alor ld 'OS O�II NVId 2J001d 15dlld A1111GIQ40.09a r AW HIVYJ lOH a0a :MI'1>10Vv F m Q N Q- o 1��i O .acoaa W NMO Su W" GKVv xau asn (aoaip and pima o) paan no! 9a143La►a O.L 1MGIil aLL sa'LkaGgal )hj-%Ia'IV aW'�Mj-aQW ro uao� au a 2 =r -v x^ sr*Hg a m v -Na11a a Hla alaho 71/>� 2 a rnNc l u ,/ Q101slia�la PG111aaa au ili?11011a mRWf-W 26 ,U 2AV" 01 a MI -401 I V AA. av oaury sllrlr �u aaau an,m of as-IO1sm au ro a i sl 11 ,sao V. i/d� saa" ,V'70, b2KLO ary caaoo asau Oi aria caaoo aa1.1-MV1s., au 210zl SNV Ici 3HL 90l ,aa "W o1 SWU aGau dO 77NVI1WJOO au a1OdNV-ld NOIlVaNnO;4 1.11,IgIsNo r_W AW mV—"ION 9200 �NIIWAW IE mmmommomw Y Egg 2 � N vo yqz� J z o '260db" N./0 611 WOO 6HVL 2Q7 mwip mo! ppn9 of paaa nol Mglba8 of 1H•,N 2 L 6aA 9922 iNI,MZW OW iHlW Q �D JO A4AQkAOW 2NU 2W 6MI'Y acsu �aw10 aaWVS WalO r�HamoaW 2nvH O� Ni�llld T T O F O 6HOISNiJ10 Hau1y,+ aHL 7klGllpli �Oi t�,,}y yy `y' `�J} u l vl a u� 0 Z Z 26 �I ja'WH 0 va4oi 1, l AG m/.OWs, Cl vinNVH 901..1 Y' !l V aRHI 11 ' Ol yipl6lYJ aHl i0u1 A-aU a1u 61 11 � ,v�o'I yau'll`d13Q 311 ?iV"1-107 m I(1 d�V 2GaU O aW 2 a+v1��SNYU 9NIWH21d ?JOJ GNV Id 3HOH 901 <O -j u+v rovro laH 6aaa �HlN011035 9NI4-11(19 p of " J 1� r�,- a� IL o� 91 uiof U Y�P !� g5w PW Y 8 w �F 9 LI 3 f� W � �o V OL � J W o_ m J 1� r�,- a� IL o� 91 uiof U Y�P !� g5w PW Y 8 w �F 9 LI W � �o V OL � • W W 0 II ry it �m 1_, O 0.�• 'x� V• J 1� r�,- a� IL o� 91 uiof U Y�P !� g5w PW Y 8 w �F 9 LI II 91 uiof U Y�P !� g5w PW Y 8 w �F 9 LI II lill� it Iii IIS GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN rm ) 1 inch - 20 fL Project Benchmark Top OF Spike Elev. as Scoled From USGS Quad Map, 7550.0 Parking Area / \7563 / .I/'� // \ 7570 qSya4<ed. enda car nee St(typical) O 4� Regrodp Afeo // / a/Shown 1 j f w`' ,yam`/ /r �! /Re t in. W 7560o`rp�0/(TOWy 757 .0) /' / r I l 1 a �6,4' ,! i I I li 1 �° 1! 1 / / Proposed Houas F/ real / StnkecV 1 / Retain Wall Fin, 1st Flo.Sr Elev.: 577.0 / m ! f / /1 N! co // 6, (TO 7578) ;!1 Q/ /// A� / J 7580 fi i f /' /! r1T /ll T // /�J / Bwlding Envelope as / �Regrade Ar/9a _. De icted on 'Chritmas 1041 o�h`howry ! / m pPlnt Book 39, Page 99 /i„I Ext, ng DffvewovJ' o Sur Yed I / b / j o/ v ps/' o 0,335/ squ e Felt4.1 c) /1a // /` / % �i�%rt //k,�" as 7Stnk Id i _ 1/._ L.- �Z / p• •�»"'7— 75.(50' 7532 7575 7580 Soilsest Pi('tilyD),a' /IF / / / // 48125. / / ,�j /�i i // 5j6 6 78 7570 to Y / // Arr� Building Envelopq i ` 7570 7560 DATUM ELEV 7555.000 `,// / //,F/o1. ptic/Leoch F)&d / 1041 HAZARD REVIEW WAIVER \ _ - j r tp •o�/ rJ ,r / r urposes Only/ `r' J0 •'.�/ J t / / 9335 s.l. / / / / ' APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THEY HAVE BEEN INFORMED 8Y PITKIN COUNTY OF THE EXISTENCE OF �� JJ "1041 HAZARD AREAS" THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE PROPERTY, ANY IMPROVEMENTS. AND THE USE AND OCCUPANCY THEREOF, THE PROVISIONS OF THESE REGULATIONS DO NOT IN ANY WAY ASSURE OR IMPLY THAT AREAS OUTSIDE // OF DESIGNATED HAZARD AREAS WILL BE FREE FROM HAZARDS, OR THAT APPROVED MITIGATION MEASURES / r' /' / ) / I WILL GUARANTEE THE SAFETY OF ANY PROPERTY. \ t \\,(/� // rr //r / / OWNER OWNER DATE:----------------------------------- "THIS 1041 HAZARD REVIEW SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY DIRECTOR/HEARING 60 �� \ `� % --1 / /\ ///r // r r / / / _ OFFICER THIS ---------' / 's ` _DAY OF ?.QO__, SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION HEARING OFFICER DECISION N0. -------- RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NO. _----_-- 7570 1580 7590 0 o4 u r PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER CERTIFICATE / TI-ilS 1041 HAZARD REVIEW SITE MAP 15 ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE ``�• Centerline OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, THIS -PAGE `t- i /' /' / / / / / / J/ DAY Gr IN PLAT BOOK AT PAGE _ ------ ._-- ---------- ,/ UNDERRECEPTIONNO ----_--2000• ------- -- __._ / ------------- PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER 7570 1580 7590 0 o4 u r br ivowaq Profile Horz. and Vert. Scale- 1' = 10' VFYORS' CERTIFICAT 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO 00 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SITE SURVEY MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR BOB HANULA BY SURVCO, INC. UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, RESPONSIBILITY AND CHECKING AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. SAMUEL D PHELPS, COLORADO REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #27613 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF SURVCO, INC. DATE OF CERTIFICATION. 27/JUNE/2000 SURVEYORS' NOTES 1) THIS MAP' DOES NOT REPRESENT A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS LAND SURVEYOR OR SURVEYING COMPANY TO DISCOVER EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS PROPERTY, ALL NO TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO COMPLETE THIS SURVEY, 2) BEARINGS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON A RECORD BEARING N.00'00'00'E. FOR THE SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. FOUND AT THE SOUTHWEST AND AT THE ANGLE POINT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE ARE REBAR AND ALUMINUM CAPS, PELS NO. 5933. 3) THIS SURVEY IS BASED UPON, INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE RECORD 1041 HAZARD REVIEW SITE MAP ('CHRISTMAS 1041 REVIEW SITE PLAN-) OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS RECORDED 1BTH DAY OF JUNE., 1996 IN PLAT BOOK 39 AT PAGE 99 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 393766 OF THE RECORDS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS' OFFICE. 4) THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY PER THE CLIENTS' REQUEST IS TO ESTABLISH THE LOCATION OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AND PHYSICAL FEATURES NOTED HEREON AND TO STAKE THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE, NOTICE; ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED 'UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON, PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (AS OF RECORD TAKEN FROM THE CHRISTMAS 1041 SITE REVIEW MAP) A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SWI/4 OF SECTION 29 AND IN THE N112NW114 OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID N1/2NWi/4 OF SECTION 32, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID N1/2NW1/4 750 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE CENTERLINE OF BIG KLINE CREEK; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF BIG KLINE CREEK 1365 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID N1/2NW1/4t THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SAID N1/2NW1/4 610 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND REFERRED TO AS TRACT NO. 6 AND PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 306 AT PAGE BIT OF THE PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 6 474.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 6, WHICH POINT IS COINCIDENTAL WITH THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 5; THENCE N.22»46'43'E. 164.50 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 5 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 5 WHICH POINT IS COINCIDENTAL WITH THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH END OF BOBCAT LANE AS ESTABLISHED AND DEDICATED IN THE FILING OF REDSTONE RANCH ACRES SUBDIVISION NO. 3; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 30 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY END OF SAID LANE TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY 310 FEET, MORE OR LESS, U THE CENTER OF BIG KLINE CREEK; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF BIG KLINE CREEK 570 FEET, MORE OR LESS, THENCE N,65'00'00'E, 1005 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SWI/4 OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 29 1869.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SHEET 2 of 2 In Driveway Grade Line@ Centerline as Surveyed. ._-- ---------- ----- ------- -- __._ o � on +'ra o� +� o� +e oM1 or. on br ivowaq Profile Horz. and Vert. Scale- 1' = 10' VFYORS' CERTIFICAT 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO 00 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SITE SURVEY MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR BOB HANULA BY SURVCO, INC. UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, RESPONSIBILITY AND CHECKING AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. SAMUEL D PHELPS, COLORADO REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #27613 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF SURVCO, INC. DATE OF CERTIFICATION. 27/JUNE/2000 SURVEYORS' NOTES 1) THIS MAP' DOES NOT REPRESENT A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS LAND SURVEYOR OR SURVEYING COMPANY TO DISCOVER EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS PROPERTY, ALL NO TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO COMPLETE THIS SURVEY, 2) BEARINGS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON A RECORD BEARING N.00'00'00'E. FOR THE SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. FOUND AT THE SOUTHWEST AND AT THE ANGLE POINT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE ARE REBAR AND ALUMINUM CAPS, PELS NO. 5933. 3) THIS SURVEY IS BASED UPON, INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE RECORD 1041 HAZARD REVIEW SITE MAP ('CHRISTMAS 1041 REVIEW SITE PLAN-) OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS RECORDED 1BTH DAY OF JUNE., 1996 IN PLAT BOOK 39 AT PAGE 99 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 393766 OF THE RECORDS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS' OFFICE. 4) THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY PER THE CLIENTS' REQUEST IS TO ESTABLISH THE LOCATION OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AND PHYSICAL FEATURES NOTED HEREON AND TO STAKE THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE, NOTICE; ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED 'UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON, PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (AS OF RECORD TAKEN FROM THE CHRISTMAS 1041 SITE REVIEW MAP) A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SWI/4 OF SECTION 29 AND IN THE N112NW114 OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID N1/2NWi/4 OF SECTION 32, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID N1/2NW1/4 750 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE CENTERLINE OF BIG KLINE CREEK; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF BIG KLINE CREEK 1365 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID N1/2NW1/4t THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SAID N1/2NW1/4 610 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND REFERRED TO AS TRACT NO. 6 AND PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 306 AT PAGE BIT OF THE PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 6 474.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 6, WHICH POINT IS COINCIDENTAL WITH THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 5; THENCE N.22»46'43'E. 164.50 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 5 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 5 WHICH POINT IS COINCIDENTAL WITH THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH END OF BOBCAT LANE AS ESTABLISHED AND DEDICATED IN THE FILING OF REDSTONE RANCH ACRES SUBDIVISION NO. 3; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 30 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY END OF SAID LANE TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY 310 FEET, MORE OR LESS, U THE CENTER OF BIG KLINE CREEK; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF BIG KLINE CREEK 570 FEET, MORE OR LESS, THENCE N,65'00'00'E, 1005 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SWI/4 OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 29 1869.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SHEET 2 of 2 In so DRAWN BY-- s.PHELPS CHECKED BY. S. PHELPS APPVD. BY: 8. PHELPS 1 k Found Rebor W/Plos. Cap, PLS ,)14111 1 D, WC I Found Rebor W/Alum. Cap, PELS 5933 Boundary Lines as Taken _ From 1041 Site Mop Found Rebor W/Alum. Cap, PELS 5933 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEST ) I inch . 50 ft_ 7570 ..:, Access Roadway (Gravel Surface) Big Kline Crask (os scaled from 1041 map) Hanula 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan an amendemerit G"T he "Christmas 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan" SITUATED IN THE SWI/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTHs RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF PITKIN. STATE OF COLORADO e Wdnfty Maps Not to Scale Butcrd �. r..w �o Biu. McCoy GLfCQ- Burns ='F' moo' State c<nnnp ca -T - " :.{� "�- d9'. Bridge} j r i h;tefRrvtr - w` ae. N,npnalFaic! -x- -.}�-'� �' Wsnttl ty]JJ 4 J "'fo als J� ca.8-rL — Eagle's -ef sus ea Gypsum V11New Ca� stle Chac a < j a'. ; ny Silt ---o._,oyDa .. •allo area eyo4" .. Glen ood Sprin s a ' - o Whrta Rrver I - � IBJ -eMeu National Forest, s.Hsw. ao. Carbondale }p esus WM �; -; El Jebel rr.r«.Po •Rnra; F _ _ _ _Ksn,r -� M,1... K SNt -Y„ iG k CII Meredith"` t`xry Snowmass ,sk .. White timer Woody- . - oCreek 'Navonal rurrr.[ _ NeZ River iK i �Nanoea, Forest Snowmass ' 6mtrr„. Village aeoASpen NalJ"I Redstone so..naa Fnc>r\ skiver' Hi �nrfs Aspen ,K$b�Area MounoaI Tc n -Y— r 1 ` o ' I "Marble e to 0 Suw �n yin _ 7570 .�^ i' ' ; ' >• 7575 SITE qppI � i5 D (X i •' r�'' �r Fx1t 1, i ;ii,%�q 7580 \\ 2 edP 10/04/00 revise grading 1 sep 09/18/00 odd two of IWO oreo BY DATE I REVISION DESCRIPT 7580 Sheet 2 for Detail n Septic Envelope See Sheet 2 for Detail Within Bldg. Envelope Found Rebar W/Plostic Cop PLS #14111 Marked "POL' I 5lubjed Proportq (Per Christmas 1041 Site Pion) tai+ Jr E1 SHEET 1 of 2 SurvCo, Inc. Professional Land Surveying Services 1001 Grand Avenue, Suite No. 205 Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601 Phone: (970) 928-8233 Fax: (970) 928—.8840 Project Benchmark Top of Spike Elev, as Scaled From USGS Quad Map: 7550,00 G"..Pt! SCALE Parking Area _ °'i, It ,I IN Fm PL ! \7503 h �e / �° tt O• �:�s� � E I Alf ! 7570 Cid 1 I t t moi\ 757-0 \" Dr1v way Grade Li e IF Center(In i as - rveyed, din Envelope Corner 7560 f g as Staked. (typical) € ! I J?ATUbS EZEV t t / r r ♦ t L t/ st 1 7555:000 I i n1C%2f N• e % G uS M "� Sn a! h !, tF II y'• �'�' /'-r Jt r J iJ ! Q, S o , • o o -i a I 1 , f*. co -E ro� j. ca -F to 1 1( a t I ! n, 4 n o'1 o n a f' Regrade�AFea / / ! t r o I i E t i J I I .."L 6 / ,•j r r'' _�,.,,� tt�t y /t `j.__-._._...-_�_.....___.._�__J"..__._._._....__._---- __.___ ,. j Rye�tgn. W y a4 d' ' j t i % I {� i Jew Fro +: %. 7560 �J'r�•~a r 1� / (TO 757.0) ,y` r,/ f` ! �.t �1 lVI.iVV� i 3 l./ ttl.r t o >x� t ! 1 Horz. and Vert. Scale, i° � 10' f 0roposed Houj' as I j ! t j �\¢ , J f f/ p Jt p >I ,f ✓rS :aket�°' I t! ` It Retain�Ft'cil I !n / { ftf/n I fV. 1St Irnir Elev.: rS%7.0/ / LTC 75tH) °�"iI� f t Irl 1! !t t j 3 I 1!t J! jJ 1/ ,/ i f r a / 11; 7590 1 k� t ` r ±2esgrade A, o �'`..Depicted Envelope as I Bepicted nn °39, Page 99 nq.�howN t ;;n Plat Book 39, Page 99 / t ! II% ysF?� rf ` rr f! fJ %t tI fl /1 tt {r tJ Iir Jfr r� r r //♦ /loilIII a 1 �, r, / tJ / I r / SURVEYORS' CERTIFICATION ynder�ra� . d L ne ti. 11 t Septfc Sys#ed Ont o , t ! J I JI: t O Exis ng O�Zvewaw / i, THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING A REGISTERED PROFESS NAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO �<6.00' Willie Strip? 1 r 1t a Scrve�ed / / DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SITE SURVEY MAP H BEEN PREPARED FOR BOB HANULA / l / d �- I / / ✓ ! INC. UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ONSIBILITY AND CHECKING AND THAT ZT IS TRUE o / .- t %/t ! / r I„ of BY SURVCG, I I / ! I / f I r • . t / f! f /i i Y Cl # i I' t AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNQWLEBGE BELIEF. Q j 1 J, }J rt f.t� 1 Oxy t g" jf fI ! f f Ott o It lr /f i 0,335r/squ e F`kt r° / h qp�p•0 REG! .... . Pr as7'IStaktJd rt ! „ ¢ �. / '—",r®,—f-" -- 75.G0 AIDE '- Y5 I r 1 j y� ✓ / I / r' i '� o 7 s; i s wOSAEJ �EL LO, RE£D�- � // /f / / / t I rr ♦I it 7575 7580 PROFE L LAND SUR' #22761133 7532 , "�;5- % f / I 1\0, FOR AN EHP.LF OF CO, INC. O rr ♦r/ r! f/ ff fl IIf h{y' ` I t / ! t �I r.`I-''r fr DATE 0.t0 AT O JUNE/2000 NAL lAN Sans �est rr! SURVEYORS' NOTES oils st jr- l�.e I 1 - r 1) THIS MAP DUES NOT REPRESENT A TITLE SEARCH BY ]HIS LAND SURVEYOR OR SURVEYING COMPANY TO r / / / / ,' f I DISCOVER EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS PROPERTY. ALL Xmende 6uiid±:g En Ione! I r ,/ I ✓� J t i j / 7570 NO TIlI,E INSURANCE COMMITMENT HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO COMPLETE THIS SURVEY. ' For S ticlL6och 9ieid Jr ! I / r II 2) BEARINGS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON A RECORD BEARING N.00'00'00°E, FOR THE i urpos s OnE�. J I P ! t r f i z SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. FOUND AT THE SOUTHWEST AND AT THE ANGLE 7f s.OI/ ! t f r 104 HAZARD REVi_W WAIVER POINT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE ARE REBAR AND ALUMINUM CAPS, PELS NO. 5933. / 3) THIS SURVEY IS BASED UPON INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE RECORD 104' HAZARD REVIEW SITE MAP APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THEY HAVE BEEN INFORMED BY PITKIN COUNTY OF THE EXISTENCE OF "1041 HAZARD AREAS" THAT MIGHT AFFECT ,THE PROPERTY, ANY IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE USE AND (`CHRISTMAS 1041 REVIEW SITE PLAN') OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS RECORDED 18TH DAY OF JUNE, / I ! , % r 1996 IN PLAT BOOK 39 AT PAGE 99 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 393766 OF THE RECORDS OF THE PITKIN m I t f OCCUPANCY THEREOF. I f COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS' OFFICE. THE PROVISIONS OF THESE REGULATIONS DO NOT IN ANY WAY ASSURE OR IMPLY THAT AREAS OUTSIDE 4) THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY PER THE CLIENTS' REQUEST IS TO ESTABLISH THE LOCATION OF THE OF DESIGNATED HAZARD AREAS WILL BE FREE: FROM HAZARDS, OR THAT APPROVED MITIGATION MEASLIRES WILL GUARANTEE THE SAFETY OF ANY PROPERTY. BUILDING ENVELOPE AND PHYSICAL FEATURES MUTED HEREON AND 7O STA.KE THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE, �i.1r a! ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS !/ fr / rr { / ♦ ,I / SURVEY WITHIN 'THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF E3Y: OWNER -- ----------------------OWNER - - ---------________-____-- CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION DATE:__._ ______._____________.___---_--_-.___-- EAS OF RECORD TAKEN FROM THE CHRISTMAS 1041 SITE REVIEW MAP) 57g'S9'ST"w I / f� ,� r1 ff J f! !f /r r1 f A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN ,•HE SWI/4 OF SECTION 29 AND IN THE N1/2Nk12/4 OF SECTION 32, ` / I f r1 / / 1 J { r TOWNSHIP lit SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6TH RM, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DES:.'RIBED AS FOLLOWS: S6Q r r / I r t "THIS 104 HAZARD REVIEW SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY DIRECTOR/HEARING \ I BE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NI/2NW1/4 OF SECTION 32, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG ti - / ♦/ ♦/ f / { / f OFFICER IHIS ----- DAY OF ----_ _ 200__. SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRAT3VE DECISION/HEARING Ta n r t L I c x -- r ;E SUU'.H LINE OF SAID N1/2NWt/4 750 FEET, MORE: ill2 LESS, T,.1 THE: EET, :R ..INF 7f' BIG KLCN CRE._:Ki .` ` ` f / rf / rf r1 / ♦ f1 ✓ OFFICER DECISION NC. RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION N0. --------------- THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF BIG KLINE CREEK 1365 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NI/2NWI/4; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE CIF SAID NI/2NWI/4 610 FEET, MORE `� r ♦rr yr r/ I I / / f1 / 1 OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND REFERRED TO AS TRACT NO. 6 AND •.e `"-'"''r r f r✓ i /f f1 / I r i J PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 306 AT RAGE $12 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY r { r✓ rr f r I rr / RECORDS; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 6 474.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER `. - " ♦' r rf ! f ] r` PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER CERT3F;CATE OF SAID TRACT 6, WHICH POINT IS COINCIDENTAL WITH THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 5; THENCE rr rr /� rr ! r/ ♦ ♦/ r1 { r N.22'46'43`E. 164,50 FEET ALONG THE EAST'E'RLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 5 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER "� ` ` ♦♦ / % ♦ / r / / t THIS ,041 HAZARD REVIEW SITE MAP IS ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE IF SAID TRACT 5 WHICH POINT IS COINCIDENTAL WITH THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH END OF s . / - f / ♦ r/ t / r rr I i I OF iiE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PIT3{fN COUNTY, COLORADO, THIS __________ BOBCAT LANE AS ESTABLISHED AND DEDICATED IN THE FILING OF REDSTCINE RANCH ACRES SUBDIVISION � ry �� -" ♦ / / r I Ir. DAY OF 2000, IN PLAT BOOK AT PAGE NO. 3; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 30 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY END OF SAID LANE TO THE NORTHEASTERLY } c ♦ r ,f rr r / f I c CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY 310 FEET, MORE OR LESS, U THE CENTER OF BIG KLINE CREEK I / / UNDER RECEPTION h0 _ �. ��s r` ♦ Jy r ! / r I / __—____________ __ ___. THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF BIG KLINE CREEK 570 FEET, MORE OR LESS, THENCE N.65000'00'E. 1005 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SWI/4 OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 29 1869.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. _ - ' ♦/ /♦ r { I f1 I� PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER ----- 7570 yj r♦r rt �'` fr fIf j/ I r f ,-5 7580 759() SHEET 2 of 2