Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.eh.272929303020 (1997)12 11,'97 11:27 M 3939632"— CR'iRa Inc. P. 92 r' acoswrrn`rr-+r F-NV1t�C7PIfWEN,1 4L, htl; ALi ,.-- I��:' 1G '137�1�=�'�=tP;1 CITY OF ASPE�1 APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYb, r- 1309. Galena St., Aspen Colorado Biel 1 Phone 970.920.50701Fait 970-920.5039 PerKl It -1 1 I Parcel IC # 2- -7 .2 C) — 29' -3 — 0 3 —o Z o Permit For: his4w Irrstatiatiar^. M Repair O Remodel( Emergency Use ( ) rM re '10 11111111111WRT MIR, Legal Osscriptlon 1-ol l_ Imp `4 n 1 Block .�+...�� ,Subdivision Size (30 01. ,�aeras Too of pmposed atn+etura: �l r t S -�. Y\ (� Brae of bldq, e,welope; Total areaMvinq seaco (sq. ft)260L.5aL+ K of Radmamg, nfi1Mn and cimllar rise rooms! Primary GCntsct Person Contact M10in, Addrexx WatariOrtvats w411 ( )5onnp ( )Stream O DommuntiyrpublIc (Name of is ,Proofi of Adequate Water Attacrad (ooutrodt ? ( ) Yes ( ) No (A water quality test and well pump test or approval letter from community system) HAiF this,projscr bash approved by Pitkin County 7 ( ) Yee ( )NO is a :spy of trio Rear p!ai aitachsct ( a u= .) ? ( )Yes ( ) No Applicstien for An inoNiduat :ewign dlsparai nystom in hamby rut mitlad, i noteby aartft Ih9t the above intarmation is true and 99z:rata aril trial t nav8 provides true and deeuratg intormation an locailans of all 90 ting and proposed wells, contour WyNaLl, braidings, property tines, ditchee, 91epa8, waldritnes, apring3, auction or irrigation linoo, dKnklrmg avatar idi8lams, drain illes. Inigation CitoW Iakt4, water Cour.00, Gtrop-q, f[codpiaina, dry gulohesi RnfJ a:t elinl) optia SystaTs, i aClt W 9g90 foal 3ny 12128 or Inuoingiele (nlormation wilt invalinwe the nppfrcetion and any eubaequent permit, iWuance of the permit does not Impiy the approval of sny othw permit roquirad for rnnrnuction pursuant to Pitkin County coda_. vo • nO mon may ba 4ndekon until all'Apprnvafll and parrnitr have been obtained. The nwncr Wisumea aU reaponsibilitiee in :ase of failure or inodaqumv of this 4yZtom. Signature of appliG5nt� - Data ---------------______________.----'fMrtlbt:�I"If"1ia•t�atalg------ ------------------------------------------- PIMNLdT R R I�iatV[0lfigL SEWA®FypD �OBGL !?:YITIM Perc Rate • >5~1 min our inoh , profile Hole Depth feet 9epiic tank capacl' 15i1>0 gallons Absorption area- 113/ sT 4-7 6N�i r Aesi9ive4� �r.��ScaysxiJ /l7ouvo , -V-50J vwsT 6e i/V�9I%G�=ic4�T—Gs� RS ol��j/� irk d e s) 51V d W-0,10' 12,/9/0/-7 Q1"lld>^e c�> vr9� 6 �j -Pte 6)S-7gyce fi--,pm Pe�q.sT�e 4V011 ?' c4o3eS7- Gor�vei- o� ��isTi v� 5Ap27c 714-0—' mKs7-6e 9re�rT�r- An inspection is required priar to baakfIll at any component of the dlstrlbutlon system, poslgn by Engineer Requirsd ?X Yes( 'No AI( plans and specifivatlans or the engine4r must be followed, Any changes must tte oop roved by the AspenlPitkih Envirommntal Hca h 4 altitrtt in wrttin a . 0 arlSAs err must certify the final installation to the Environmental Health Oapartment in writing. Parmit approval DY. Crate 2�'//'9 Plans and Specification M ins proposed individual sewpge dlapaaal ayetem have been reviewed and aro considered satfalaciory. Permission is hereby granted to the owrtar or the agent to perform, the wCrk indinsled in accordance with the Pltkln County ISM Regulation in e11100 at ttti'time of iooue. Thi: permit becomes invalid 6 monthE from -the date that tha permit was -issued unless i!retern construction has Commenced or art wdonslon has been approved in writing by the Oepatim9nt- A&-Billlt drawings must be it eluded with this permit before Ina final approval will be yGsued, Installer: Recf3ipt.i �,. Site Plant Weii Petmit and _ _— Solis Test t! - pate received Floor p'ltan -. �. Water Quality Teat or Datta info Complete - Received oy Comm Approval __ water System Lettl°r Final Insp Requested r FtnaflnSptitrt9dit APPravt�i..����,y� — pines. �� areHa same ar�1► February 4, 1998 Tom Dunlop Pitkin County Environmental Health Dept. 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Mueller ISDS Repair/Replacement HCE File Number 97004.22 Dear Mr. Dunlop: 0 6 1� On January 20, 1998 HCE personnel observed the construction of the replacement ISDS located at 0133 Antelope Drive, Redstone, Colorado. All of the components of the system had been installed, but no backfilling had taken place. Our observation was hampered by several inches of snow, but it appeared that the installation of the system was in conformance with the intent of the design. We understand that you have discussed finalizing the construction in the spring with Duane Piffer. Thus, final grading, revegetation, and placement of riprap would be completed, as weather allows, in the spring. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Sincerely, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. Tim try Prin -,ipal Engineer TPB/soe cc: Sherry Rubin, Crystal River Realty 923 Cooper Av6nue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • FAX: (970) 945-2555 December 22, 1997 Temple Glacier Pitkin County 530 East Main Aspen, CO 81611 VIA FAX: 920-5198 RE: Mueller ISDS Permit LICE Job No, 97004.22 Dear Ms. Glacier: DEC 1997 I e i ENVIRONISEN'TAL HEAL -1 Id F;,:: )ETN ! PI``i KIN • This letter is submitted in regards to the concern of placement of fill in a 100 year floodplaitt for the construction' of an ISDS. The applicant proposes to place fill material within the flood fringe area on the east side of the Crystal River. No encroachment on the floodway is proposed and all fill placement will be located within the flood fringe. The required fill slopes would be graded three horizontal to one vertical, and they would be protected with twelve to eighteen inch diameter rock riprap as shown on the ISDS plan. The field was located as far as possible from the floodplain, within the constraints of the property. Approximately two-thirds of the ISDS bed lits outside the floodplain, the remaining one-third is located in the flood fringe and will not impact the floodway. The proposed project consists only of the placement of fill as cover for an ISDS, no other construction is currently proposed. If you have any questions or need additional information after reviewing this material, please contact us. Sincerely, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. -+-==� -� Reviewed Eric P. Tuin, E.I. s by., C'- Roger D. Neal, P.E. M. Karen Gardner- Pitkin County Environmental Health 9s5'f ZO/ZO 'd 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • FAX: (970) 945-2555 999zS 60L6 'ON X9 a ON I MN I ONH MINA00 HO I H Wd Z9: ZO NOW 3-ZMK 12f11/97 11:26 S 303963«:631 CRR, Inc. P.01 �s Y-C""� ML --e f(eV- acv FAX FROM: CRYSTAL RIVER REALTY 117 REDSTONE BLVD. REDSTONE, CO 81623 PHONE: 970-963-3408 FAX: 970-963-2633 DATE:— 10 — I t " q�I FAX MESSAGE FOR: FROM: PAGES INCLUDING COVER PAGE: PLEASE CALL IF TELECOPIER IS INCOMPLETE HAVE A GREAT DAY! The information contained in this facsimile message is intended only for the use of the individual named above. -w December 10, 1997 Tim Beck High Country Engineering 923 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Tim: ASPEN • PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT Before we can issue the Mueller septic permit, we need a final detailed design that describes how the mound will be protected from floodwaters, including ensuring that floodwaters will not impair the functioning of the septic system, and that floodwaters will not cause the septic system to pollute the stream. This design would also include exact dimensions and depths of gravel, soil, number of pipes, etc. This will need to include at a minimum, the type of rip -rap and reinforcing system used to support the mound; and the type of curtain or liner used to prevent effluent from traveling laterally into the area within the floodplain. Secondly, the initial design is for a system for a 3 -bedroom house of over 2,000 sq. ft. Because the application before the Board of Adjustment will be for an expanded house and septic system, you may want to come prepared with a map that shows where the mound could be located if it were just for the existing 2 -bedroom house of under 2,000 sq. ft. If you would like to provide us a copy of that drawing as well, we can help the Board understand the impacts of the two systems. The septic permit application we have on file is for a 2 -bedroom house of less.than 2,000 sq. ft. We understand that they really want a septic permit for a 3 -bedroom house of over 2,000 sq. ft. A new application is needed if the applicants want. a septic system for a 3 -bedroom house of over 2,000 sq. ft. Finally, an application needs to be submitted to Temple Glassier for work in a fl oodplain for the dirt that will be placed in the floodplain. Before we can issue the permit we will need to have confirmation from you that the Army Corps of Engineers does not require a permit for this work. Since this application is for a site requiring protection from the floodplain, we will need to have time to forward the final design to our contract -engineer for his recommendations prior to issuing the permit. The Board of Adjustment meeting is scheduled for January 6, so we would need all design information by December 17 to 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1975 • PHONE 970.920.5070 • FAx 970.920.5197 Printed on Recycled Paper SW%NWy NWX.S I( I B•�e I ' (1 0 I 1 wK1aAIJAL 1 I Irk •'4\ - 2 7.Ion Aye i SEX NW'/, J f •�� /. J Q [• •fie. ,\ O a•� `BEAVER I .� _ �Nf 0 PLAT OF THE REDS TONE RANCH ACRES SUB—DIVISION SITUATE IN THE SE%NW%i, SW'/.NWV4, NW% SWVi, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP /O SOUTH, RANGE 98 WEST o/ /he S/.YTH PRINCIPAL MER/O/AN P//kin County, Co/oro do Scale: Iln.1 l00 /I. Of0/CA7/ON ,v,,, ALL NEN B✓ rHE5C pR£SfNCS, Incl MI weinipnle, A,,,, rONC It AepCI., C. eIM9 /e1 u11 ^"6 phe,nn ne prtOeN/or of Ie1 Sf PVNWVd, SWWNWLV, ane M. NW' SWN', Sc: f9 ro.MAo 105-1. Rwrf1 68 wr,l aI IAI 5/rIe HM[MO/ Mar/e/en, 1RVIN, Ir/np, ane 01M0 /n Ma Cevnl)) e/ H/fln d .�Iel1 or Celorade, [b[ Mixer r p,a1 ro to mod[ ene five In., RMI f IM RE OSrONf RANCN ACRE5 SU8OrvISA7N hlin0 uI /rp S, ' Lne Roe[ol Lino:, elree %,, -1 a/ol I'd IxC-/ , pwZ•.1IO, Mv1 ."HMO IIIA a+olrariJ+l b IM taN, Or ni 'a LNC! !cavo on IA/, A N s eo1, n•r[ey /[a[olr el/ emo M len[[, of lM�n Mi! RIeI /a IM x!I / M. aelK Mr rool, one 0111.1 ene d"Z He, !wd I—, meet and food /w IM pur0 M a/ NaW/M/ [IrroMry / h![r/Ma+ M Kn [m,vlperl — el mean[!•1 , 11 e/ /r^( •n eNd Nnh • pFOSCONE pINCN ACpfJ SUB-O�VIS.tlw, s•I rI,IIy /el ,wd elel al d,1.M I, AY leu.. !M Lall, Orhq en/ Lswn 1[ ml ••• �Tnn ^^•„ LY wimiss WNCRCO£, Me /ndo"I'Me hot too his Bend ene ,w/, en Ica, the /6M ear o/ Jung /959. RfO5�r0�Nl-�PAAWN ACRES',. INC AI/nr�Sir a� ��'—`�-'`��"` � GLtrSrlHfdA•�+Qi� LS[ALl ron vr1,lelnr ! _ fel % Oe/n0 M,Irvminl xe o11 -11d,11 DAMN 11 MM 16M doy of Aml, 1959 by ROW L. Anvn/e11 e, w11 .I1nl oM 61-01 A. PINI 0, „,•Ivry oI RLOSrON£ RANCN ACRES, IAC., a Co—do ,orporel/xn. Mr eemmar/on Irpl.I, J���. i�L60 , weM„ mr d e oN�,NI ,m/ NWf' �t / AA � lr `.BEAVEq \ fl C+Nr Sec. 29, T -10-S., Rr--88-W. 6”' PM. 0 d PLAT OF THE REDSTONE RANCH A CRSS SUB—D/ V/S/O N SITUATE /N THE SE%NW%SW//eNWVR, NW%SW%, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP /0 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST o! the SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN ANE Pilkin County, Co/oro do \\ Sea/B: / M. • /00 /T. OEOILAT/ON.' 6NOW ACL MEN By THfSE PRfSENTsi Mol ph, unMn/yyn.e, RrOSTONE RANCH ACRES, INC, eeiv the reb ens e•YS- S,nla, f9 T ,nq 10 Sa.n, MMn CO Wefr e[ IM ❑ ane pntRN/or a/ M. S£N'NWV,, SB'V,NIVW, we Me NWL`SW4M, O.Mp /n fee Lane/ e/ RIf1n a /ab el Le/weee, er. 5'.. NMrh'e/ Mer/e/on, ,/N.M, "MAD La/t A-/ b A -M, ?aA Mbn+l — ne MAO Mi, 1/e1 or He RIOVONE RANCH ACRfS SUB-!M'/S/ON h/Mp e/ Loh B-/ M 8MM M[fniw ene Lett C-/ end L -f, Beewr OrN,, AnlekrRe Or/u,, f/flene, BI/Ma Lsn., ,— Lwe ZBOA— Lene, one ley ou/, Rb/ ane ,ueeh/d, pert el IM aho.v ee,er+eee not ,ropnry -A, IN. Lsh, 01-1 —I— fho.n [n /eg eb1 end eou A.nhy eeA'eeh e// emu M /ena, ea ,Arn Mb /b; ra rhe en / In, peepe M nes, me unh/wt we d.0— Mer reit a/e/ h met. and Nee (e Me purpwe Of pW,lhp -HOW, ,/ ee.e.IRAen A, ,KA tenwtsr» o, mey be mee. M Nen,Mrr/n, per[., or /ene ,nupnd wMM Ae REOSTONE RANCH ACRES SUB-O/VbKN; ene C-11Me ,pi, plot [orr. 101 ,hp., M. (eh, Oriw. One Len., e, IA. I.— on ,Ireer,e upon Me prwne. /N WITNESS SSthe uneen/pnM A.."' Ah Mnd -,f'Se"en Mh, IA, /6M ter et Jen., 1919. RfOS/TJONfpRANCH ACRES, INC. A `^� ��55 brr'—T-�v�` Rr.,lenr T TA/ pomp M,Iromenl .o p,I,,Id ld eNote m. Mil 16M dq er .hw, 1919 Oy Rl"A L. Anlpn/e., ,-J r° aM G,orp, A. R,- e, »[r.10, Of REOSTONE RANCH ACRES,MC., a C.1-0, corporellon. M, [emmheme nplrn Jlye 1960 , wRn.» MT e d wNeM1 seer �-! e. Rehr N. Reloph, /Int eMe r.oM, upon A)t e,; deter» we tert; Mel S it a Re L Sw,ryer CNA a IA.I he M, REOSTONM RANLH ALRES SUL -OMSION; rephl iee o e.r Jn, /a., o/ M, 6b1. e/ C' S, lo; heaven [or M,., IM Leh, Or/w, ene Lene, In M, Md rum Mrwy . e[nbhh eo,.; rnel tn. per O" c AS — AY'OS yONE RINLH ACRES SUB-Oly/S/ON e, M. stmt A.nL/-tM^o�hJtl upon the around p„r,r 'S SuM ene vem Io N/en me Mh MIA soy eI ,Arne. AO. 1919. — — — odbe Sec. 29, T -10-S., Rr--88-W. 6”' PM. JOHN MUELLER HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. AG" ISDS LOTS B-6 & B-7 923 COOPER AVENUE III�uvner REDSTONE RANCH ACRES SUB. 81601 GLENWO(970)P945 NE��hEE!?A/JEi 97004.22 58676 FILE: 22MUELLE Ilk 1 OF 1 SCALE: 1"= 30' REV: 12-12-97 ory OWE y (\\ LOT B_CVV APPROXIMATE FOOTPRINT OF •, FIELD FOR 2 BEDROOM HOUSE.so, F AIIN ii HIGN j WA RUNE / CZ, �W <� � (�W EXISTING 500 GAL DOSING 'i TANK •�ti9ry W � ` EXISTING 1750 GAL,: kK` •' SEPTIC TANK / LOT B-7 0ce y / - SINGLE -STORY FRAIAE HOUSE VATH WALKOUT BASEMENT / • EXISTING EXISTING WELL 10' UTIUTY EASEMENT PP••{{ . 'F�^.+ F�,�y'j'��' i -a' !.d Un �1! < V 4�1 Pk ; ('• ,) 0Lv. 1997 ... . ..... LNVIRONMENTAL A� EN / Pi"i` JN SITE MAN FOR 2 BEDROOM HOUSE 5-60.30 5-60.30 Plat Applications for all Group II development activities, with the exception of lot line adjustments. ; include a final plat prepared in compliance with the requirements for a final plat identified in Section Lot line adjustment plats shall be prepared in accordance with Section 5-60.40. (Prior code § 5-603) 5-60.40 Lot Line Adjustment Plat Applications for lot line adjustment plats need not include all of the information required for a final plat in Section 5-50. An applicant shall submit a neat legible ink drawing on a twenty-four by thirty-six inch sheet of mylar showing the information listed in this section. A. Title identifying type of review; B. Vicinity map showing relationship, of parcel to proximate public roads; C. List of all conditions relating to site development; D. Date; E. Scale; F. Planning Director signature block; and �• G. Legal Descriptions and sketches of. 1. Fathering parcel prior to adjustment; 2. Receiving parcel prior to adjustment; and 3. Parcel to be transferred from fathering parcel to receiving parcel. (Prior code § 5-604) 5-70 MINOR AND MAJOR REVIEWS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS OF LOCAL AND STATE INTEREST (1041 ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD REVIEW), ACTIV- ITIES OF LOCAL AND STATE INTEREST AND DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS AROUND KEY FACILITIES (Prior code § 5-7) 5-70.10 This section of the Coii�'be�j lishes the required submission contents for Minor and Major reviews of Development in Areas Local and Sta st/1041 Environmental Hazard Review, Activities of Local and State Interest and Development in Areas A— acilities. Referto Section 4-40 for the review procedure for a minor review of a single family dwelling unit in of Local and State Interest/1041 Environmental Hazard Review and Section 4-50 for the procedure for them mew of a single family dwelling unit in 338 CI -n / Pitkin Environmental Health Department Contact Log Sheet Name: Parcel ID#: Address: ZM5(� — Date Person Spoken To Comments / Action to be Taken Initials e c �. A1070, o177S is 67�� - G G e is ih A c e a,1 -d alp kf e cerZ22 ev� d - G fab OyIJ R o' ;` i i I i Debbie Quinn, 04:32 PM 12/5/ sherry rubin issue X=Sender: debbieq@conunons.co.pitkin.co:us Date: Fri; 05 Dec .199716:32:38 -0700 To: leecgco-pitkin.co.us From: Debbie Quinn <debbieq@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: sherry rubin issue Cc: rnicki@co-pitkin.co.us, cindyh@co.pitkin.co.us Lee, We're trying to set up a meeting on. Monday with you, me, Mick, and Rubin and some people she's bringing -Mick wants us to be prepared to say they can, do legally if they want to expand the existing house,i.e. what is the. solution. -and ffthe solution -is to build the mound high enough to. be out of the floodplain, can thatbe done without the sloping supports on the sides. of the mound which you indicate are the violation of the ISDS/.state regs? For any solution, Cindy, is, it development which will require any land use approval as well?:Lee,'you.might let Cindy know where`the property is so she can let us know. Thanks. Debbie >X-Sender:leec@cQmdev.ci.aspen.co.us . >Date: Thu,: 04 Dec 199714:04:22 -0700 >To; debbieq@c.aspen.co.us >From: Lee Cassin <leec@ci.aspen.co:us> >debbie, >I'm'not sure T left an intelligible. answer on your machine, .so here's the >answer to >" is amound built up aabove the flood plain�no longer in the floodplain?" >It is no longer in the floodplain if it is. 'raised high enough, but it has to »be built up so that there was a 4' separation from a level �' above the 100 yr >>flood elevationA.e. the base of the mound would have to be .5', above the >>100 -yr -flood level. In their case, they may or may not be able to do that; :. ._ I don't think: >they have so far, & it will probably require a board of adjustment variance >approval (that we'd recommend they grant). the.50'setback from, >>the river's high water line still has to be met. >> >>Lee ' Printed for Lee Cassin <ieec@ci.aspen:co.us> _ 1 Debbie Quinn, 08:53 AM 12,/9/ _ , Re: mueller X -Sender: debbieq@commons.co.pitkin.co.us Date: Tue, 09 Dec 1997 08,53:53 -0700' To: Lee Cassie <leec@ci.aspen.co ;us> From: Debbie Quinn<debbieq@ci.aspen,co.us> Subject: Re:'mueller. Cc: lancec@co.pitkin.co.us " Lee, Given Mick's comments during the meeting, I suggest deletion or revision of the request for a second map showing.the location of the septic for the tvVo bedroom house. The applicants are aware that it is an.issue that the BOA could raise, and you certainly would need to answer any questions and disclose that the variance request is for a system to accommodate an expanded house -so maybe revise that paragraph to indicate because the BOA will know the: application is for expansion, they Maywant to come prepared with such a map, rather than you requiring it. Secondly please include the third issue we discussed, which is the necessity for a flood plain application to be submitted to Temple Glassier. t would be nice to: get a copy. of 'such. an application from hei and -enclose it -with your, letter. Finally, .do a cc of .the letter to those who attended the .meeting. Debbie >Debbie and Lance, >Here's a letter I thought I'd fax to everyone, since with' all the players on >their end, there seems to..be some >confusion about what's really needed. I thought l'd let you 2.1ook at it >and tell me if I'Ve left, out >or said anything confusing. thanks >Lee >Attachrnent Converted: C:\HOME\INATTACH\MUELLER2.doc > Pkinted,for -Lee Cassin <leec@cLaspen.co.us>, : 1 FIGURE 7-10 TYPICAL MOUND SYSTEMS Straw, Hay or Fabric Cap Distribution Lateral Fill Topsoil Absorption Bed - ME - /.Plowed Layer of Top Soil Slope 7 7 44 :!Rock Strata or Fmpermea6le Soil layjr7- (a) Cross Section of a Mound System for Slowly Permeable Soil on a Sloping Site. Straw, Hay or Fabric Fill—, Cap Distribution Lateral .,—Absorption Bed E_pf Top Soil Permeable Soil no new or expanded syste ® floodplain. our reg considers flooRlain as the horizontal mapped area I was contacted by the owner is probably early 1995 about replacing a failed system in the river. I indicated that he'd need to have an engineer do soils tests and design the system, due to the high groundwater. The owner indicated that, due to his background as a geologist, he did not feel it was necessary to have an engineer design the system. I suggested he might be able to do the design himself and then have an engineer approve the design, in an effort to save himself some money. The owner submitted a septic system application recently for an expanded house and expanded septic system. We tried to determine whether the existing system was large enough to serve the expanded house, and when we told the owner we couldn't find records of the existing septic permit, he told us that we wouldri t have a permit because he had installed the system without a permit in 1995. Constraints are the following: systems cannot be installed in a floodplain if there are hazard - free areas on the site ( and then, only if we can be sure the system is protected from floodwaters). There is an area outside of the floodplain where the system can go safely. However, it could not be expanded to serve the addition the buyers want,"without the septic system having to extend into the floodplain. We do not recommend that the system go into the floodplain. This would require the system to be within the road setback (where the illegal system already is) and would require board of adjustment approval. We would recommend the BOA approve a variance, because the need to protect the water quality from impact from a flooded septic system is a greater concern than the road setback in eh opinion. A portion of the mound would still have to be in the floodplain, but only the supporting sides, not the actual sewage treatment area. This would require a county permit for floodplain development and possibly army corps of engineers permit. We would have to be sure, in any case, that the area inside the floodplain is well -protected from floodwaters, by rip -rapping; etc.. The system would also have to be lined on the outside edge, so sewage cannot enter the floodplain area from the side. repair systems can go in the floodplain only as long as their impact is minimized: no closer to the river than was the failed system, protected from flood by raising above and rip/ rap etc. the system would have to be raised to 5' above the flood level, and adequately protected from floodwaters by rocks, etc.. John Blair: 4'suitable bet bott & top hi grid water. since in flldpin, in cet seasons, hi grid water over top of ground. if big enough mound, in floodproofing, determine 100 yr+1. could be mounded out int he floodplain. need to talk to corp of engineers about encrouachment into floodplain. you could have a lot all in the floodplain, w/ a huge mound. if get corp. permission, you're no longer in the floodplain. floodway=where it spreads in 2nd streambed 20 or 30' wider, where main flow of channel will be going duing a flood. floodplain is where water is ponding but has very little flow. not the main current. area of floodway smaller than floodplain. ® • �a r�(AY7 �eG � � y� 1 aseanut "�o Vllri �:YG4-t r Ccs vw Eq ES Redstone Ranches Bridge EC 7282 F,O� I 729 FF a 0 sr 7314 FF 7287 DV ,7279 -�9 ZONE AE U 7216 7230 7240 S� O� 2S, • • 7275 7,7276 X31 EA ES� ,7279 -�9 ZONE AE U 7216 7230 7240 S� O� 2S, -�tr■■�■1�w 1.2111/97 11:28 $ 303963 CRR, Inc. 97 09:00A Bart Wg,';ller �r 303 440-6131 7—Al lAll idr�c P.lei�•ti► Jr 604 00 ry p -T' �� Af IlciG �Ird JLIv1•6� . iAfCG�!.AiS ;; APPLICAT FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 130 S. Galena St., Aspen Colorado 81611 Phone 970-920-5070/Fax 970-920-5039 Permit # Parcel ID # 1_;_) -7 aQ — 03'(DaO Permit For. New Installation Repair ( ) Remodel ( ) Emergency Use( ) Name of OWNER CATH E rALt;LL11�IQ_ W 3E L NV_-Adp 12 - Street Address AtllfL - nPE- TJR J3F�ns TntyV-_ 04 C 0 rl) (O 2,3 Owner's Mailing Address t ^ �y I , q u Business Phone: • Y ` -- Home Phone: 97 0 " -! LP 1 3 7 Legal Description: Lot /5-' p JJ'- Block Size of lot: / WL!— C ss Type op posed structure: Total area/livinq space (sq. ft): Subdivision IN Size of bldg. envelope: # of Bedrooms, offices and similar size rooms: Primary Contact Person SA VIN E Contact Mailing Address Business Phone 7 Cell Phone Fax: Water.(private well ( )Spring ( )Stream ( ) Community/Public (Name of Is Proof of Adequate Water Attached ( Required ? (Yes ( ) No ( A water quality test and well pump test or approval letter from community system) Has this project been approved by Pitkin County ? ( ) Yes ( ) No Is a copy of the floor plan attached ( Required ) ? lv/Yes ( ) No Is a copy of the site plan attached (Required) ? ( ) Yes ( ) No Application for an individual sewage disposal system is hereby submitted. I hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate and that I have provided true and accurate information on locations of all existing and proposed wells, contour intervals, buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes. waterlines, springs, suction or irrigation lines, drinking water cisterns, drain ties, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, ftoodpiains, dry gulches, and existing septic systems. I acknowledge that any false or incomplete information will invalidate the application and any subsequent permit. Issuance of the permit does not imply the approval of any other permit required for construction pursuant to Pitkin County codes. No construction may be undertaken until all approvals and permits have been obtained. The owner assumes all responsibilities in case of failure or inadequacy of this system. Signature of applicant L /l.�O / " Aw/Date / -----------------------•------------------------ForcrEmsrtmerntiseoelow---------------------------------------------- PERMIT FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Design Criteria of system to be Installed ( Any changes must be submitted and approved in writing) Perc Rate min per inch . Profile Hole Depth Septic tank capacity: _ gallons Absorption area: An inspection is required prior to backfill of any component of the distribution system. feet sq. ft. Design by Engineer Required ? ( ) Yes ( ) No All plans and specifications of the engineer must be followed. Any changes must be approved by the Aspen/Pitkin Envirommntal Health Department in writing and the engineer must certify the final installation to the Environmental Health Department in writing. Permit approval by: Date Plans and specifications of the proposed individual sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby granted to the owner or the agent to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County ISIDS Regulation in effect at the time of issue. This permit becomes invalid 6 months from the date that the permit was issued unless system construction has commenced or an extension has been approved in writing by the Department. As -Built drawings must be included with this permit before the final approval will be issued. Installer: Receipt # Site Pian Well Permit and ,l f - lu-61 Date received -~ Floor Plan Water Quality Test or _U( i_ Received by Comm Dev Approval Water System Letter Final Inspection Approval: Date: Soils Test Date Info Complete Final Insp Requested APEHO 10M NOV-17-97 MON 01:59 PM HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING FAX NO, 9709452555 November 17, 1997 Mary Wood Pitkin County Environmental 1-leatth Dept. 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Mueller ISDS Repair/Replacement HCE File Number 97004.22 Dear Ms. Wood: Post -its FaX Note 7671 1 Date - ages rom Phone 11 _CAOoneJ Fax Fax 6 OV 8 199 This letter is to transmit the profile and percolation testing information we gathcrcd on the Mueller ISDS, located on Lots B-6 and B-7, of the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision. At the time of our initial observation on October 30, 1997, there was groundwater in the profile hole (labeled PI1 41 on sketch) at a depth of approximately six feet. However, there was evidence of groundwater up to a depth of approximately two feet. The soil profile consisted of one to two feet of topsoil then sand, gravel, and cobbles for the remaining depth. Percolation testing was performed on October 31, 1997. The percolation rate varied from approximately two to four minutes per inch. Please see the attached sketch for the locations of the percolation test holes and the profile hole. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Sincerely, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. Til �thy 1'. Beck, P.17. Prii cipal Engineer TPR/soe enc. cc w/ enc.: John Mueller 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • FAX: (970) 945-2555 NOV-17-97 MON 02:00 PM HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING i FAX NO. 9709452555 P R,ESSULTS OF PERCOLATION TEST joe e 97 00 v' 2 2- ADDRESS DESCRIPTION J '' •I// 2GC�J7�✓.� DATE DEPTH AND DIAMETER OF HOLE /1 O iz • /2 3�' O e #3" O �� • APPROX. GALS. ADDED HOLE /1 ?'Q dYt,r cv /1 #2 2 -IL e�/ , r #3 /O Lel/; •'' // TEST HOLES WERE PRE—SOAKED FROM. (Dote) (Time) TO: (Dale) (Time) HOLE # I HOLE #2 HOLE #3 0 TIME R F MARK . FALL MP TIME REO HAOK FALL RATE H TIME I F WIR FALL RAS TO H2O RAT 3-/7_.lo o -7i A 3 Q,'Q o, 67 3:22* t1 0� .S Vo 3 21;/S 2-0 y•er2�_ / 3 3 e'b l el `172 0-20 �'oT.�i /•l� PERCOLATION RATE: REMARKS:14' 1 ° !_e/c' e' MPI Yl S /. 111Gvr .� 1 c f.- /a / .(if- << r ate•(- /Z S /' lei 7 7; e (,le_ 1 tr•3 e AREA SKETCH: TD 7IT. ~x �` py K. C/ r' / rdc- �v sAs ulf�.I cnl Fav I=wmEERINQ INC. • 923 COOPER AVENUE • O-ENWOOD SPf�, CO. 81601 (970) 945-8676 PROFILE HOLE AND SOIL DESCRIPTION e AREA SKETCH: TD 7IT. ~x �` py K. C/ r' / rdc- �v sAs ulf�.I cnl Fav I=wmEERINQ INC. • 923 COOPER AVENUE • O-ENWOOD SPf�, CO. 81601 (970) 945-8676 NOV-17-97 MON 12:20 PM HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING November 17, 1997 Mary Wood }'itkin County t;nvironmental Health Dept. 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Mueller 1SDS Rcpair/Replacement HCE File Number 97004.22 Dear Ms. Wood: FAX NO. 9709452555 Post -it' Fax Note P. 01 7671 Date ( pas lo From o. f 1 Phonc # 961 I Fax # NJ LAM ► 7 1997 � �� L ASS' =lu L , ri 1 �°. `r' lilN This letter is to transmit the profile and percolation testing information we gathered on the Mueller ISDS. located on Lots B-6 and B-7, of the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision. At the time of our initial observation on October 30, 1997, there was groundwater in the profile hole (labeled PH # I on sketch) at a depth of approximately six feet. I lowever, there was evidence of groundwater up to a depth of approximately two feet. The soil profile consisted of one to two feet of topsoil then sand, gravel, and cobbles for the remaining depth. Percolation testing was performed on October 31, 1997. The percolation rate varied from approximately two to four minutes per inch. Please sec the attached sketch for the locations of the percolation test holes and the profile hole. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Sincerely, 14Kil I COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. Tip thy 1'. Beck, P.E. Prii cipal Engineer TPB/soc one. cc w/ enc.: John Mueller 923 Cooper Avenue - Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 - FAX; (970) 945-2555 NOV-17-97 MON 12:20 PM HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING �ee>_ FAX NO. 97094.52,555 P. 02 RESULTS OF PERCOLATION TEST w # 00 ADDRESS DESCRIPTION :70 4" �,e/%� 2e�� & 7 e__ DATE / o DEPTH AND DIAMETER OF HOLE /1 _2L2 O /�• • f2 O ` 0 N APPROX, GALS, ADDED HOLE #1 2sa awy- (,+ /' #2 � Cf-"_ r / 1 p /D ems:..', ,--t . S TEST HOLES WERE PRE—SOAKED FROM: (Date)— (Tkne) TO: (Dote)� (Time) HOLE # I HOLE #2 HOLE #3 TIME RTO ARK F� �1E TIME FIEF H2/�RK •FALL R1riP TIME R�0 �2aK F� RATE J /0 0,79 047 (. G 3:22;�• .� ? &a`.3 r•% ('."30 el y. Off. ' f Z- A 03 2-0 s.oy z (9 c MPI PROFILE HOLE PERCOLATION RATE: Qy�� 1 �l Pl j REIAARKS le /,.e <'c rr: ,� v,r-:� /6'/ n 1. �x� �� i�r c�i� AND SOIL DESCRIPTION %(i t'S % Pl �O � r r1C. �c•! i /ice l r/\/� /Y ri �R �r.//cG •JJ(r�i %l„ Q/E'!i /S G ql�c l� sir rJ��r/r' AREA SKETCH: ,o'Id �nP/I S I vq 10 )r O �N ✓_� ®Y �►' �.--�',_ 1 �� CO. 81601 • (970) 945-8676 sm HKIH COUNTRY R� INC. • 923 COOPER AVENUE • CLENWOOD SPRINW, oil 4 6 > ( f i i. O �� Lo4c w2 �sC�S X ®\ T� --aCADE bv�..-,ugh ' Mn . t fl -4,-7'-�Ii►1 ) �, Al Cil V�-c� -l1� Tv L� \ ' ------------- - L `4 650 LX �� __..... �'3 0 ._ � ___ __.._.�._.__�.___ . �- �: _ 7 �� - G ..�_ . __.. , _..__ �- �'� X ASPEN/PITKIN ENvIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT ISDS DESIGN REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Name Mueller, Cathe Permit # Parcel ID # 2729-293-03-020 House Size 2000 sq. ft. (75 gpd, 100 gpd, or 130 gpd) 100 Number of Bedrooms, Lofts, Offices, Similar Rooms, Main House 3 Number of Bedrooms, Lofts, Offices, Similar Rooms, Caretaker unit 0 Average Daily Waste Flow 450 (# bedrooms X 2 people/br X 75) State Review Required? no Perc Rate 3 (T) Design Flo w (Q) _ # bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.75 Q= 1050 Absorption Area (A= Q/5 X SQRT) A = 363.7307 sq. ft. of absorption area required 23 infiltrator units without reduction A maximum 30% reduction is allowed for use of deep gravel or gravelless chambered system. 254.6115 sq.ft. with reduction 16 infiltrator units with reduction Type of system: []Absorption trenches []Absorption bed [] Gravelless chambers []Dry well []Seepage Pit []Pumping Chamber Is an Engineer -Designed System required? no yes y' reason: c ; Ly_C� ))cub Minimum tank capacity 1313 gallons '�� `'� ►'7� L SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 104 Remember: 8 feet of additional distance for each 100 gallons/day of design flow over 1,000 gallons/day should be added unless an RPE can verify that it is not necessary to prevent contamination. Printed on Recycled Paper ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT SEPTIC SYSTEM APPLICATION CHECKLIST ASPEN P= ENvntoNMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT NOTE: YOUR SEPTIC PERMIT APPLICATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL OF THE INFORMATION BELOW IS INCLUDED. The soils test must be done by a Registered Professional Engineer (or under his or her supervision). You should plan to meet with the RPE at your site to discuss where the soils tests should be done to meet all of the county regulations and where you want to put your house. Once the soils test is completed, bring it to our office along with the other items below. Completed application form Site map showing locations of all existing and proposed wells within setback distances (including on surrounding properties), contour intervals, all proposed and, existing buildings, property lines, ditches, slopes of greater than 15%, water lines, springs, suction (irrigation) lines, ` drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, irrigation ditches, lakes, water courses, streams, floodplain, floodways, dry gulches, or existing septic systems. This must include all such features on neighboring properties within setbacks. Complete house floor plan Proof of adequate water supply: for private wells, well driller's pump test showing gpm actually produced, well permit showing legal supply, and test showing good quality; for community systems, proof there is adequate water for all houses served by the ;system; for other systems, proof of adequate quality and number ofgallons/minute. Soils report: profile hole and percolation tests. Permit fee Copy of county approval (1041 approval, subdivision approval, etc.) g:\eh\isds\isdschck 130 Som GALENA STREET • AsPEN, COLORADO 51611-1975 • PHONE 970.920.5070 FAx 970.920.5197 • Printed on Recycled Paper - � 0 FROM LINES IN SPACE 19709633852 11-12-97 04:15PM TO "9634465 P.1 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE Exp1� es `pi a No 3067-0011 w May Jr, 1973 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM ATTENTION: Use ul this certificalo does riot provide a waiver of ilia flood insurance purchase requirement, This form is used only lu provide elevation inlurrnalion necessary to ensure compliance with applicable community floodplain management ordinances, to determine the proper insurance premium rate, and/or to support a request fora Lotter of Map Amendment or Revision (LOMA or LOMrt). Instructions for completing this form can be found on the following pages. SECTION A PROPERTY INFORMATION BUILDING OWNER'S NAME f)Im I`, lhEli �Y STREET ADDRFSS (including Apt., it, $uilo anchor Bl Number) On P.O. RQyTU AND DOX NUMBER Q13 Vk4�iu c ]Y, C OTHE-H ULscnIPTION (Lot and Wock Numbers, sk..) L. n+ t3 -� R�� Stuv% RCA h,%c.L% A Crc S FOR INSUr AWE CUMPANY 0517 - 1,00CY Ne )Mncn COMPANY NAIL NUMBER ZIP COUE ._.-- uE clTv (� N s -1 lu ►. C c �> , rpt C U % I L Z 3 SECTION B FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) INFORMATION Provide the following from the proper FIRM (See Instructions): 1. eommuNI rY NUMUL-R 2. VANLL NUMIIEM 3. SUFFIX UATE O��,Fy1FInM IND[X s, rinM ZowE B. nAsn FLUUO El F,VATKIN fin "�asl, Jopll i) 6g o z 7 OIL2_ L. _ 97 ,"' ! A E / � 7, Indicate the elevation datum systom used on the FIRM for ©ase Flood Elevations (SFE): I7 NGVD 'z9 NOthor (describe on back) 6. For Zonas A or V, where no BFC is provided on the FIRM, and tho comoiunity has established a BFI= for This building site, indicate the community -s DFE: L_1_L_L.. I' I.I -I fool NGVD (or other FIRM datum -see Section 8, Iter'n 7), SECTION C BUILDING ELEVATION INFORMATION 1, Using the Elevation Certificate Instructions, indicate the diagram number from the diagrams Lound on Pages 5 and 6 that host describes the subject building's reference level 2(a), FIRM Zones Al -A30, AE. Af-1, and A (with 13FE). The top of tho reference level floor from the soleclOd diagram is at an Olovaiior) of L-131 zIL1, I feel NGVD (or other FiRM daturn-see Soction d, item 7). (b), FIRM Zones Vt-V30, VG, and V (witty WE). Titer bottom faf the IoWest horizontal structural Inerriber of lhu rfe[erenw level tram the selncted diagram, is at an elevation of I I_..I_1_l . I .I .I feel NGVD (or other FIRM datum -see Section B, Item 7). (c), FIRM Zone A (without UFE). The floor used as ilio reference tovol from the selocted diagram is j I I , I ._j foot above L. or below f I (check ono) the highest grado adjacent to the building. (d), FIRM 'Zone: AO. The floor used as the reference level frorn the solocied diagram is t I . I . (__I feet above L_ J or below I ..I (chuck ono) the highest grade adjacont to the building. if no flood depth numbor is available, is the buildin j s lowest floor (reference level) elevated in accordance with the community's floodplain manacdon)ent ordinance? I-1 Yes [ .._I No i ] Unknown 3. Indicate the elevation datum system usod in determining the abovo reference level ClCvations; D NGVD'2'3 X Other (describe under Comments on Paige 2). (NOTE: if 1179 elevation datum used in measuring the elevations is different fha r? that used on ilia FIRM 1900 section ta, ltam 7J, then convert flee elevations to /lie daturn system usod on file fIJIM and show 1170 conversion) equallot7 unCer Comments on Page 2,) 4. Elovation reference mark used appears on FIRM: I __I Yes�5 No (Seo Instructions on Paye 4) 5. i'ho rererence love[ elevation is based on, I0 actual construction 0 construction drawings (NOPE: Use of construction drawings is only valid it fhe building does riot yet have ilia rolnrence level floor in place, in which case this certificate;' will only be valid for ilia btlilding during the course of construction, A post -construction Mcvalior) Ge(lificale will be reiqufrod once construction is complutd.) _ G. The olovation of Ilia lowo.,l grade: immediately adjacent to the building is:1 14124 I`�I-� teat NGVD (or oilier FIRM dalulrrsrzo Soction B, Iters 7). SECTION D COMMUNITY INFORMATiON u i. If ilio community official responsible for verifying building elevations specifies that the reference level indicated in Section C, Item 1 is not the "lowW floor" as defined in the community's floodplain management ordinance, the elevation of the building's "lowast floor" as dolined by the ordinance is: L.L. I ...j__(__I ,L_.I feet NGVD (or other FIRM datum -see Section Ei, Item 7). u n ly Ilul I. it; IVWIJbI 11uv1 4z. uv III mu 111 tllu -/ ill loin 111y b lluuurlallI I low lutjvm l lcl l l v1u/l Fal rMvr ulo v1a•a l.Vrr •+r Irla uu..unry Y ry r•v./. Iloor" a5,delined by the ordinance is, Ll.. I I L .L.I feet NGVD (or other FIRM daturn-seqQftlon E1, Item 7). al 2. Uale of 1ho Start of construction or subslarlwnprovoment FEMA Form 81.11, MAY 90 REPLACLS Al I PREVIOUS LIN I IONS SEE t1EVEF15E, CLUE FOIL COWINUAr1uN FROM : THOMAS A MELBERG R"TY PHONE NO. : 303 923 3 QUIT AIM DEED (Water Rights) C. Dale Alcorn and Erlene K. Alcorn (Grantors), of 38992 River Frontage Road, New Castle, CO 81647, for the consideration of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, hereby quitclaims to Thomas A. Melberg and Marilyn S. Melberg (Grantees), of Box 2202, Aspen, CO 91612, all right, title and interest Grantors have in and to the Alcorn Pump water right, decreed. ' lute in Case No. 94CW210 in Water Division No. 5 on March 16, 1995, together with all i• Dances and any other water or ditch right situate or appurtenant to the real property u Colorado described on Exhibit A, attached hereto as a part hereof .ocr. Signed this ��� day of Septerm�er, 1997. J � C. Dale Alcorn It4- A/, a. ---- Erlene K• Alcorn STATE OF COLORADO) ss. County of Pitkin ) �jr Gr -7r 8 �� The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this d day ofSepten+er, 1997, by C. Dale Alcorn and Frlene K. Alcorn Witness my hand and official seal. '� P► y!°r, My commission expires: 11S14?q L Not :icL �''�aAddr0LN .ole (I 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IN 409635 10/20/1997 04.19P GCD DAVU SILVI I of 3 N 16.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITkINCO COLORADO 751" �i F • P4JtCLl A: A tract of land hefng port of Lot 3, lection 21, Tosenship 9 Sowth, Ra)ige 83 West of the Six=h principal Meridian. said eraet is more ,&Cully described as follov�: Idginning at a point on the North line of said Section 22 whonca the Northeast Cormor of said Section 21 bears North al •ao' roatb 144d.6c roett theme* south 49.50' Bort 980.00 lees to the conterlins at zhe Roaring Fork eheaee South 0s•OD' host JJJ.85 1005 along the centex•Ztne of Che Roard»0 Fork R1 vor; thence South 8?°33' 149t 394.819 feat; thence North 01'03' west 3103.00 deet 60 she podAt si be9inala8. Together with an sasament of ingress and .gross along the eousse of she road as 3e now constructed and in uso, being 18 fever vide agrooe she property herezaafter described to W;t: A ttaet of land being part of lata 2 and 7, SOCCIMA 23, Tawnship 9 South, Aange 43 pest of the sixth Pru cipal Nerldian. Said tract is more fully dsaa3'U®d as follows: 5t:Arting at a point ea the North line of raid Saeti.ox 21, whence the trorthease Coraar of said Section 21 boars Worth i9'SO' Saint 1405.60 foot) thence South 01151• -cast 985.00 lest to Cho trua P01,pt of baginniAff; Lhoaco Yorth 82023' vent 354.#6 feet to the eoaeerlin• of the Roaring Perk Rjvrt; tA*jlas Souch 03.00' Vast 106.26 )oat alonq the eenre-r1lne os` the Rearing For:.. �tivar; thane• sou+h 91000' rays I9a.o0 leer alenp the cen4oa'iiAe of sh® R&ArAAV Pork Rtvir; thence South 46030, dost 160.00 loot along the Contor3Lne of Me Aoaring Perk 1t3ver: thence South 68025' Sar= 199.76 toot &Zang Cho een>BerI A® of the Roari.:g fer< A1verT thence Nerrb 01.51' Nest W.00 face to the point ai begInning Lr99 AND =elsvM6 the Denver and Rao Grande Xallr64d Aighe at Way and also the County Aaad Alpht of vay. COUYrx Or PxxrZN, ST"S Cl COZOAAao PARCEL B. 1 a 7 0 BepJr,6nAr9 at At Point WhonaQ the North t/4 eorner cf section 29 boars North 3.13'49'' Wvaz' 23:6.00 feet; uhomce North 22604'00- Sei= 179-44 #etc; thomcr $Ouch SS°ZS'00'' Ed�C 124.:0 ieQn; thenoo South st•S9153'' NQsz 207 -PI tee=; th&nce South b6°04' vest 170.00 teat mere or 1tss to tha bank of the Rem—ring Fotk River; theavo NorMwo61e92y IS loot mOr6 or less along the bank u: t;ja Roar:Ag Pork Advezr thMee North 2!•o:, Sage 1B0.00 toot Mora yr leas to eha POIAz Of bQv.LARiAg. also Y.nova as Let P. Lletle tomas subdlviAion. t:OGNTr of PYTXZ'N. STArt Or COLORADO Tom Bennett, 09:42 AM 1 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 09:42:56 -0700 From: Tom Bennett <tlbennet@smtpgate.dphe.state.co.us> To: leec@ci.aspen.co.us Subject: septics -Reply Lee: The high water line is the appropriate point from which to measure setbacks to ISDS system components - as per the note at the bottom of the table, "The minimum distances... shall be maintained.." Re; Mary's issue, there is no prohibition against running the effluent line back through the house, I sure wouldn't have it in my house, but if that's what they want I would require that the piping be somehow permantly marked/ tagged that it contains wastewater. Tom for Lee Cassin <leec@ci.aspen.co.us> 1 1 .q tlbennet@smtpgate.d, 09 1 AM 11/25/97, floodplaindmOluestion To: tlbennet@smtpgate.dphe.state.co.us From: Mary Wood <maryw@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: floodplaine question Cc: BCC: X -Attachments: Hi Tom! Here is another wierd question for you... and thanks, by the way, for your other answers. I have a septic application where the property is in the floodplain, there is an existing home, and they wish to sell their property but the prospective buyers are making the sale contingent upon a new septic system for an additional bedroom. Our zoning department has a 30 ft. front yard setback requirement for anything done that will be over 30 inches high. This system would be over 30 inches high, so the engineer moved the system (20 ft.) that he originally designed at the 10 ft. property line setback to 30 ft. from the front yard property line. The front yard property line is also the furthest point from the river and I would have required that the system be as close to the 10 ft. property line setback as possible. They are trying to save time and avoid having to go through board of adjustment, which is understandable, but from an environmental health standpoint I don't feel is allowable. The engineer has said that he has raised the system up above the flood .level so it is no longer an issue. I told him I wanted to check with you because I thought that if it was already as far away as possible, then that is what would have to be done. There still is 20 ft. that they have to move the system to get it as far away from the river as possible. The existing system is against the 10 ft. setback according to what the engineer gave me, but this system was put in unpermitted in 1995. I thought that they couldn't get any closer than what was existing. Prior to that system, they had an old cesspool somewhere off the back of the home. Anyway, Tom, my basic question is if the engineer can raise the system above the floodpain and prove to me that he has, and with rip -rap or some other means to insure integrity, have a system in the floodplain even though there is still 20 farther from the river than he can get and still meet the 10 ft. property line setback? Thanks again!! Mary Wood Aspen/Pitkin Env. Health 970-920-5069 Printed for Mary Wood <marywCdci.aspen.co.us> 1� 11/26/97 17:29 $970 963 4405 COFED CARBONDALE Q002 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY see The Arrached O.M.B. No. 30670264 STANDARD FLOOD HAZARD DETERMINATION lnsrrucrions Expires April 30, 1998 SECTION I - LOAN INFORMATION 1. LENDER NAME AND ADDRESS 2. COLLATERAL (Building/Mobile Home/Personal Properry) PROPERTY ADDRESS (Legal Descrgirian maybe arrached) COLORADO FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK CERTIFIED ADDRESS: 133 ANTELOPE 981 COWEN DRIVE REDSTONE, CO 81623 PARCEL ID: 2729-293.03.020 AKAI ADDRESS: CARBONDALE CO 81623 MATCHING ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED IOR 133 ANTELOPE REDSTONE, CO 81623 PARCEL ID: 2729.293-03-020 3. LENDER ID. NO. 4. LOAN IDENTIFIER 5. AMOUNT OF FLOOD INSURANCE REQUIRED 9176452 $ SECTION 11 A. NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) COMMUNITY JURISDICTION NFIP Community County(ies) State NFIP Community Name ' Number UNINC. AREA PITKIN CO 080287 B. NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) DATA AFFECTING BUILDING/MOBILE HOME NFIP Map Number of Community -Panel Number NFIP Map Panel Effective/ No NFIP (Community name, if not the same as "A") Revised Data LOMA/LOMB Flood Zone Map 080287 0162 C 06/04/87 C Yes Date C. FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE AVAILABILITY (Check all their apply/ Federal Flood insurance is available (communityperriciperes in NF(P). Regular Program since 06/04187 DEmergency Program of NFIP Federal Flood Insurance is not available because community is not participating in the NFIP Building/Mobile Home is in a Coastal Barrier Resources Area (CORA), Federal Flood insurance may not be available. CBRA designation date D. DETERMINATION IS BUILDING/MOBILE HOME IN SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (ZONED BEGINNING WITH LETTERS "A" OR "V")? D YES x[] NO If yes, flood insurance is required by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. It no, flood insurance is not required by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. E. COMMENTS (Oprional): Nore: Any Dere proceeded by 0 has been modified from your criginal request. LIFE OF LOAN CERTIFICATION Certify To COLORADO FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK TRANSFERABLE Subdivision Name ; Attention : IODY ANTHES Condo Unit Number Department : Filed Plat Number %or : Section Ward Borrowers Name : BARTON & KATHIE WELLER Block; File Reference : BARTON & KATHIE WELLER Lot : Census Tract : FIPS ST: CNTY: MSA: CEN: Township : Range : Section ; Loan Comments : Tract Property Comments : This determination is based on examining the NFIP map, any Federal Emergency Management Agency revisions to it, and any other information needed to locate the building/mobile home on the NFIP map. F. PREPARER'S INFORMATION NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NUMBER (if orher then Lender) DATE OF DETERMINATION Transamerica Flood Hazard Certification 11/17/97 TFHC CUSTOMER ID P.O. BOX 607 69830-001 Elmwood Park, NJ 07407-0607 TFHC CERTIFICATION NUMBER Customer Service : (800)247-3384, FloodFax : (800)553-3424 199711 17CE0261 11/26/97 17:28 $970 963 4405 COFED CARBONDALE U001 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET The information contained in this transmission is intended for the conf�dentiat use of the recipient only. If you received this transmission in error, please contact the sender immediately for instructions. Date: / ( —(e/ q7- To: Company: —F17— Fax 4: f a — 15— 19 NA From: Fax 4: (970) 963-4405 # Pages Including this Cover Phoneh:(970) 963-4401 If you do not receive all pages, please call the sender immediat=ely. �We are transmitting from a CANON L700 ;:r; s Lw'.; S!�"'�..".�::.-.avf::>,Cs»l.;:ix�'Ls:?�s1.:::....s.::�.'n.�..nn:.':......................................................,. COLORADO FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK The Only Bank That Does Only Mortgage Loans!! 981 Cowen Drive, Suite D Carbondale, CO 81623 �:; ::3:;.,................................�... ,. (970) 963-4401 ....................... Q Lee Cassin, 11:26 AM x024/97, septics -Reply X -Sender: leec@comdev.ci.aspen.co.us Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 11:26:12 -0700 To: betseyk@ci.aspen.co.us, maryw@ci.aspen.co.us, nancym@ci.aspen.co.us, tomd@ci.aspen.co.us From: Lee Cassin <leec@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: septics -Reply Hi everyone, FYI - once again, you guys are doing the right thing, making the right decisions, as usual! Keep up the good work!!!!!! Lee >Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 09:42:56 -0700 >From: Tom Bennett<tlbennet@smtpgate.dphe.state.co.us> >To: leec@ci.aspen.co.us >Subject: septics -Reply >Lee: >The high water line is the appropriate point from which to measure >setbacks to ISDS system components - as per the note at the bottom of >the table, "The minimum distances... shall be maintained.." >Re; Mary's issue, there is no prohibition against running the effluent line >back through the house, I sure wouldn't have it in my house, but if that's >what they want I would require that the piping be somehow permantly >marked/tagged that it contains wastewater. >Tom Printed for Mary Wood <maryw@ci.aspen.co.us> 1 Lee Cassin, 11:26 AM U 24/97, septics -Reply X -Sender: leec@comdev.ci.aspen.co.us Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 11:26:12 -0700 To: betseyk@ci.aspen.co.us, maryw@ci.aspen.co.us, nancym@ci.aspen.co.us, tomd@ci.aspen.co.us From: Lee Cassin <leec@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: septics -Reply Hi everyone, FYI - once again, you guys are doing the right thing, making the right decisions, as usual! Keep up the good work!!!!!! Lee >Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 09:42:56 -0700 >From: Tom Bennett <tlbennet@smtpgate.dphe.state.co.us> >To: leec@ci.aspen.co.us >Subject: septics -Reply >Lee: >The high water line is the appropriate point from which to measure >setbacks to ISDS system components - as per the note at the bottom of >the table, "The minimum distances... shall be maintained.." >Re; Mary's issue, there is no prohibition against running the effluent line >back through the house, I sure wouldn't have it in my house, but if that's >what they want I would require that the piping be somehow permantly >marked/tagged that it contains wastewater. >Tom Printed for Mary Wood <maryw@ci.aspen.co.us> 1 NOV-03-1997 13:46 AMEPTSPEC-REGAN'S 140ME INSPECTION SERVICE Number One in North America November 03, 1997 Sherry Rubin Crystal River Realty 1171/2 Redstone Blvd. Redstone, CO 81623 Dear Sherry: NOV l � IQ07 Michael did a simple a water quantity test at 133 AnteloAe in Redstone on 10/29/97 as part of the inspection of this property. He followed the guidelines set by some of the relocation companies for testing wells. Michael ran the water at the shower/tub at the highest level in the home for 30 minutes, checking for any low pressure. The pressure appeared to be strong for the entire 30 minutes. After thirty minutes, he filled a 5 gallon bucket in less than 45 seconds. According to the relocation companies, 3 gallons/minute is the minimum requirement for water flow from a well. If the client requires further tests or information, we recommend contacting a pump company such as Samuelson Pump Company. If you have any further questions, please call. Sincerely, Andrea Reg AmeriSpec P.O. Box 2420, Basalt, CO 81621 Office: 970.963.4090 800*892.4090 Fax:970*963.4899 http://www.amerispec.corn K,wh :1-,,,wanv independently owned and nrweat�.I. DTT -31-1' ' T 16 1 A1,9FR I SPEC -BEGAN' S WATER WORK6�11t1 F.L1 a NOV19 x,:1037115 __� _ .Date D�lEected: LLA t:$ U iILJ MI C. ENVIRONMENTAL. %' . ASPEN! �%tarnu!t^-t>n DEP Cer!�A,Pd L t2. €.a-AU2s Page 1 of I Date Received-. 10/30/97 Date Ana;. -god: 1413C.1197 Cli$t�t� tame: W. & lilrY. �ieker t„ustcrrier {�alrittt:AEPi�►peC Horne irtspgctlan Service Sample 133 Antelope LocaWn: Redstone, Co 91623 p.O. $Ox A 2420 BaSait, Co 81621 I" -rhe Mater , $Smple • %int of coitection: Lower L fOrxri Purvt'-aa DescriptWn �0 ' 1997 Total CkAwornt F"I. c0ii Sodium Rota-Irs'aiurn coppor won mar4w."t i r, a6esium Gataitn» Arsanic L"d E4 Turbititty Color odor C,orlduL;iivity T.D.S. $+dfmsnt Alkaiinity Chl ortft Chloride Harda*" Hibzw Hittite Amnwnla 8uifatit EWRC * ANALYTICAL RESULTS * AS Standard Scan Mi t$.0 mZ iic Trutt 1.30 mom D40 MWL D.03 MO& No Lia* No UIT01 0.05 m9lL b.01 sg/L 6.5-8. 5 sU WO L1tft i$.a C.U. 3.0I.t' X 700 unmas 5W M21L Posm" No Emelt No L rek 250 MWL No Limit 10.0 mstL 1.0 MWL NO umft 230 MOIL AR1mWV9gst&fi6n* OUCWta Animal Baeu 'ii massachuwus D.E P. Guidetinea A CbmpOnvnt Of Sift indicut" Flumbing Cvrrustiril ar own stains, Bitter Taste May Catise Laundry SWO10 A Coengor+ant of Flardttesa A GompOtwnt of Hardness A Toric WWW A Toxic Metal Acidity Utc GetOrnIM0 011 prewce of Particbs Glarlty (0) Disc9lar3tlon (15) Od*t due to Co0taMin2Wn Etactric0l ftsisUncu Total Qissalved Minerals Presrrnt Undissdved Solid Ability to f'i@%&alize Acid A 01S!nh0tznt A Compong"t Of Satt 0. - 75 Is Considered Soft indicator of 8iologictl 1Naste tndicauW of Waste indicator of Waste A Min". Can Cauca Odor (l'TirnVY) (Prirnary) (Secondary) (Socundary) (Secondary) (501:0ndary) (Primary) (Primary) (s""dary) 04 immy) (secondary) (Secondary) (umhoWern) (Secondary) (Secondary) (Secondary) (Primary) (Primary) (Primary) WOO of100 0.05 0.02 0.006 0.003 0.001 0.005 0.00$ 0.006 0.005 0-14 0.10 1.0 0.50 [1.10 1.0 RoS94og 1.0 Q.01 1.0 1.0 0.10 0.01 0.01 1.0 + = Exceeds EPA Guidelines ND w Levd is geEow Det vbon Limit NT = Not Tested MGL - EFA MUimtms Contamination Level MDL . Minimum Da%vdou Level ,, tr_ipSri?i fJi Vet sample and nes�3 it d�Pe't r the Vahry of 2a� oltng- The sysuiw �t c ru"y ua the xslwtit die rzs�od Water N+vrks ttbvrz+�orati s,�` t!� sx f:^ -id la�,'z"1.+' M fiom shy :Latfi;iry ar{siAi , wt vidu; we e,! -such eeiuits- SEARRTOWN MALL WEST + oQ ComMERCM&. R13AD • LEClMthi$Tfrit, MA iJ 1 453-3333 res—Svc'mw^ ——-♦ ..-. —, � - - -- TOTAL P.02 http://www.,Ospeb.leom/bi...actualvalt=&actualvaeq= �. http://www.aspen. com�exhtml?fo...actualvagt=& actualvalt=& actualvaeq= Pitkin County Assessor - - aspen snowmass -=pilkin county - There were 1 matching records found. Locate all Sales of this Property +( View Property Detailorli s Tax Schedule # R007369 Tax Area 040 Parcel # 272929303020 Name MUELLER CATHE L Mailing Address 0133 ANTELOPE DR City REDSTONE State CO Zip 81623 Street 1.33 ANTELOPE LANE Legal Description SUB:REDSTONE RANCH ACRES BLK:B LOT:B-6 & LOT:B-7 BK:0579 PG:0178 Total Actual 212100 Value LU-cit • of -ip tkin - aol - -mailbox - -index - aspen- county - Aspen Snowmass Online is a subsidiary of Aspen Interactive Media, Inc. P. O. Box 10, Aspen, CO 81612, Tel. 303 920-1176. Send responses to info6d)aspen.com. Copyright© Aspen Interactive Media, Inc. 1997 OM t 1 of 1 11/20/97 09:11:31 http://www.aspen.com/bi...etails&taxsched=R007369 http://www.aspen w m/texhtml?form=pca.details&taxsched=R007369 Pitkin County Assessor - - aspen snowmass - - Pitkin county - Tax Schedule Number 007369 -mailbox - index - f - � aol - Item Number 01 � Number Bedrooms 3 Number Bathrooms 3.0 Square Feet Heated 1790 Year Built 1963 Classification Code $ -cityolltkin aspen- county- Aspen ount Aspen Snowmass Online is a subsidiary of Aspen Interactive Media, Inc. P. O. Box 10, Aspen, CO 81612, Tel. 303 920-1176. Send responses to info,@aspen.com Copyright© Aspen Interactive Media, Inc. 1997 1 of 1 11/20/97 09:12:19 tlbennet@smtpgate.d, 04k4 AM 11/25/97, floodplain ciestion To: tlbennet@smtpgate.dphe.state.co.us From: Mary Wood <maryw@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: floodplaine question Cc: Bcc: X -Attachments: Hi Tom! Here is another wierd question for you... and thanks, by the way, for your other answers. I have a septic application where the property is in the floodplain, there is an existing home, and they wish to sell their property but the prospective buyers are making the sale contingent upon a new septic system for an additional bedroom. Our zoning department has a 30 ft. front yard setback requirement for anything done that will be over 30 inches high. This system would be over 30 inches high, so the engineer moved the system (20 ft.) that he originally designed at the 10 ft. property line setback to 30 ft. from the front yard property line. The front yard property line is also the furthest point from the river and I would have required that the system be as close to the 10 ft. property line setback as possible. They are trying to save time and avoid having to go through board of adjustment, which is understandable, but from an environmental health standpoint I don't feel is allowable. The engineer has said that he has raised the system up above the flood level so it is no longer an issue. I told him I wanted to check with you because I thought that if it was already as far away as possible, then that is what would have to be done. There still is 20 ft. that they have to move the system to get it as far away from the river as possible. The existing system is against the 10 ft. setback according to what the engineer gave me, but this system was put in unpermitted in 1995. I thought that they couldn't get any closer than what was existing. Prior to that system, they had an old cesspool somewhere off the back of the home. Anyway, Tom, my basic question is if the engineer can raise the system above the floodpain and prove to me that he has, and with rip -rap or some other means to insure integrity, have a system in the floodplain even though there is still 20 farther from the river than he can get and still meet the 10 ft. property line setback? Thanks again!! Mary Wood Aspen/Pitkin Env. Health 970-920-5069 Printed for Mary Wood <maryw@ci.aspen.co.us> 1 E 10-1.14 Floodplains: No new or expanded system may be installed in a floodway or floodplain. A repair system in such areas shall minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system, and discharge of the system into the flood waters. Facsimile Transmittal .S n 6 NOV 2 4 1997 Date # of Pages 11 � ai (c,—'t"'C'l, w T0 From Co.lDept. Co.lDept. ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Phone # Phone # 970-920-090 Fax # Fax 970-920-439 I VLC: home/admin/forms/FAX.doc NOTES 0A &A-" moo^ a t \e4 PITKIN COUNTY PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY DATE: November 20, 1997 PROJECT: Mueller Lot Line Adjustment OWNER: John Mueller APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Self PHONE: 963-9354 FAX: 963-1389 SUMMARY PLANNER: Lance Clarke 920-5452 1. Type of application: Subdivision Exemption for Lot Line Adjustment 2. Describe action/type of development being requested: Adjustment of lot lines to eliminate lot line between lots B6 and B7 of Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision 3. Areas in which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of reports requested: Please provide application submission requirements specified in Land Use Code Section 5-60. There should be a written report addressing the criteria and standards of Land Use Code Section 3-190.30. Please provide lot line adjustment plat on 24"x 36" blueprint drawings as specified in Code Section 5-60.40. The plat will be entitled the "Mueller Lot Line Adjustment Plat of Lots B6, B7 of the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision." The plat shall also be submitted on 3.5" diskette. Include the pre -application summary sheet with the application. 4. Refer to: Attorney, Engineer, Zoning. 5. Review is before: Administrative. 6. Public Hearing: No. 7. Applicant is required to post sign for public hearing: No. 8. Applicant is to submit list of adjacent property owners: No. 9. Disclosure of ownership: Yes (two copies). 10. Number of copies of application to be submitted: 4. 11. What deposit was Applicant requested to submit: $450.00 12. Agreement to pay form : Yes, one copy. Can fill out when submitting application. 5-60.20 r 0.20 Application Contents Development applications shall include the minimum submission contents for all land development applications listed below, a written report demonstrating compliance with the review standards listed in Section 5-60.10 and depicted in Figure 5-1 and the additional submission contents specified in Sections 5-60.30 and 5-60.40. A. General: All development applications shall include, at a minimum, the information and materials specified in this section of the Code. During the pre -application conference, the Planning Office staff may authorize modifications to the required submission contents. B. Applicant's Background Information: A letter signed by the applicant containing the applicant's name, address and telephone number, or if applicable, the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. C. Parcel Description: The street address, and current legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur and a 81/i' x 11" vicinity map locating the subject property within Pitkin County. D. Disclosure and Proof of Ownership: A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the develop- ment is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company or attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting use and development of the parcel and proof of the owner's right to use the land for the purposes identified in the development application. This shall normally require proof of complete ownership or written consent from all owners. The staff may also request the applicant to supply a title history for the subject property and contiguous property demonstrating the chain of title. E. Legal Access: Sufficient information to demonstrate that the applicant has adequate legal access to the parcel for the development proposal. F. Standards Report: A written report demonstrating that the proposed development complies with the applicable substantive review standards. G. Pre -Application Conference Summary Sheet: A copy of the pre -application conference summary sheet provided to the applicant at the pre -application conference. H. Site Utilization Maps: Twenty-four 24" x 36" and two 8�;_" x 11" site utilization maps specified by the staff during the pre -application conference. During the pre -application conference, the Planning Office may authorize an applicant to consolidate or delete specific maps which may not be applicable to a particular development proposal. The 24" x 36" site utilization maps must be folded to fit within a legal sized folder with the name of the application visible. Rolled site plans will not be accepted. I. Copies of Application: Tl0M=} application copies. (Prior code §5-602) cio I'll, ( 4 i 337 3-190.30 r 0.30 Lot Line Adjustments A subdivision exemption to adjust a lot line may be permitted subject to between adjacent parcels or lots compliance with standards in under separate Procedures and submission contents). this section (refer to S ownership Section 4-4p and 5-60 for A. The adjustment creates not more than the original number of lots or parcels. B. The Purpose or effect of the lot line adjustment is not the creation of a increase in floor area ratio for a parcel which m size for deve gains size, nor creation of new lot or parcel, nor any lopment or resale purposes. a lot or Parcel substantially different C. in the case of conforming lots and requirements for area or width established by the provils sions10 the Code. lot or parcel shall conform to the minimum D. In the case of substandard size lots or conformity as to lot size so long as the other Parcels, the resulting lots e to parcels standards of this code continue may increase in non - E• The applicant shall prepare a subdivibe met. sion exemption lot line adjustment the standards in Section 5-60. J nt map in compliance with F. A lot Iine adjustment shall not be used to increase the floor area ratio in size due to the adjustment. The floor area ratio will be the adjustment. Applications to add floor area ratio to a lot or reduced for a parcel that increases redpard on a parcel that decreases in size due to and shall be reviewed ursuarit to Section 3-190.90. Ord. 95-, P ( P are considered to be major amendments (Part), 1995:prior code § 3-1803) 3-19 Fully Developed Land Subdivisions A A su 'vision exemption for a fully developed land with Stam this section (refer to Section 4-50 for in A. The or parcels will meet ion divides land which is underlying zone district B. Remodeling of Permitted; however, the restores in any chanZn ge in use, addition C• The development v D. The developme *40 Other land use reoulati.,, and E. The on may be permitted subject to compliance and Section 5-60 for submission contents). developed under existing zoning and the resulting lots Isional requirements. existing re ential dwelling unit resulting reco ction, or replacement of any legally an expansion of floor area is of mg units, or ex Y stablished structure resulting expansion of the building footprint is prohibited. not done shall prepare a final plat in with the law at the time of development; required subdivision approval or to avoidkL subdivision or 204 with the submission contents in Section 5-40; CgysTq k RIVER e. , ER UA SRN ISP l • M'N i SACK r LEI r O / 0g� n �m � i ! " p omD Zx ~ 0000h�y� moo / oo Z \ Dm-iG) / Z r7 fA Ezo> - UO / I• i� Dom, 1�0 .. m SZ;.Oy. 2s A 0 z..ia Mvrnv �o.w 20 C) zm6 o ;0.,,. ODN O0 Z >50' FROM WELL =.J a � - / I 6 >MOM VP L: t FROM LINES IN SPACE 19709633852 11-13-97 12:18PM TO BOB McCORMICK 963 2633 P.2 Vj 3 -J. to '^ a 1,79) Jnnr �u1 ., XM "J. n t ti N`:�_T.E S' 0 — lndicat�'s found property carner; (D - indicates Set rebar & cap L.S. 14111 Bearings and/or distances not: shown on boundary of Lots 0-6 and B-7 are not given on the plat of record of Redstone Ranch Acres Sub -division Parcel I: I.ryal 1)escription: Lots IT and H-7, Redstone Ranch Acres Sub -division, Fitkin County, Colorado. Parcel II: See Shcct 2. I hereby certify that on November 14, 1988 a survey was performed by me on the above described parcel of land. A single -story frarne house with a walkout base- ment was found to be on said parcel as shown on this plat. All easements, on- croachrnent and rights-of-way in evidence or known to me are sliown. This survey iso Lru/e and nrrect to the best of my knowledge and belief. S,y Jney L, nc i come P.L.S. 14111 ,ti;!1i,Tliltt1il� r . �,,(ry�y}f�P1,j�`Y9M kPl•4 � ^7�1�.�, e 4Y' LINES 11V 5PACe1**r'Ew WU SYDNFY L/NC/COME (L. S. /4/11) kp—,z 2. BOX 121 CARBONDALE COLO. 303-963-3852 5e 1 i `7 G'7 1 15 ---:S�V. �CtRRJ SCALE:1"= moo' \ 1 lye, N`:�_T.E S' 0 — lndicat�'s found property carner; (D - indicates Set rebar & cap L.S. 14111 Bearings and/or distances not: shown on boundary of Lots 0-6 and B-7 are not given on the plat of record of Redstone Ranch Acres Sub -division Parcel I: I.ryal 1)escription: Lots IT and H-7, Redstone Ranch Acres Sub -division, Fitkin County, Colorado. Parcel II: See Shcct 2. I hereby certify that on November 14, 1988 a survey was performed by me on the above described parcel of land. A single -story frarne house with a walkout base- ment was found to be on said parcel as shown on this plat. All easements, on- croachrnent and rights-of-way in evidence or known to me are sliown. This survey iso Lru/e and nrrect to the best of my knowledge and belief. S,y Jney L, nc i come P.L.S. 14111 ,ti;!1i,Tliltt1il� r . �,,(ry�y}f�P1,j�`Y9M kPl•4 � ^7�1�.�, e 4Y' LINES 11V 5PACe1**r'Ew WU SYDNFY L/NC/COME (L. S. /4/11) kp—,z 2. BOX 121 CARBONDALE COLO. 303-963-3852 5e 1 i `7 G'7 1 15 ---:S�V. �CtRRJ SCALE:1"= moo' FROM LINES IN SPACE 19709533852 11-13-97 12:19PM TO BOB McCORMICK 963 2633 P.3 Ak PARCEL II: A st.r.ilj of. ,land situated in Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision as recorded with the Pitkin, County, Colorado Clerk and Recorder, q; -A i, 4L] �stI.-i l-) 01' 1.aild being a!L-uALcd in the NW 1/4 SW 114 of Section 39, township 10 SouLh, Mange 88 West of the 6th Principal Meridian and being more particularly described as I34�cjinning at the Southeast Corner of Lot B-7 in said Redstone Ranch Acreo Subdivision; thence N 37 degrees 57 minutes 37 ijCCOnds T 11.82 feet to a point on the Southwesterly boundary .line of o 40 toot wide road right-of-way as built and in place; t_J7snr:t alonq said right -of --way line the following courses: 51..71 f( -et along tho arc of a 05.32 foot radius curve to the right, the chord of which bears N 34 degrees 40 minutes 30 seconds W 56.93 feet; thence,.89.49 feet along the arc of a 153.47 foot i',:JCJ! rJ Curve to -the right, -the chord of which bears N 00 degrees 36 minutes 20 seconds W 08.23 feet; thence N .16 degrees 06 minutes E 82.67 feet; thence N 73 degrees 54 minutes W 3.25 feet to the Northeast Corner of bot AM6 said Redatono Ranch Acres Sub6ivis,ion; thence S 16 degrees 06 minutes W 104.04 feet alone the: SatiLcrly boundary line of said Lot B-6 to the Northeast Corner oC said Lot B-7; thence"along the Easterly boundary line of said Lot L-7 as shown on the plat of record for said Red>3Lojje Stanch ;\crc- sv; Subdivision to the Southeast Corner of said Lot_ 3-7, the point of beginning. County of Pitkin, state of Colorado 4 0 0 �fY&rovew► P v L SLtnje c i rz 2 BY L/ IES IN SPACE SYDNEY L/NCICOME (L.S 141// ee 2- 2- 80X 121 CARSONOALE COLO. 963- 52 V i e 1 r1 `7 0V. 19,971 SCALE:I"= O ^ti - HIGH WATER LINE 30' OFFSET FROM PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED MOUND \ 10' OFFSET PROPERFROM TY PROPERTY LINE SUBt� (APPROXIMATE FOOTPRINT) - EXISTING ROAD CIL SITE `1 A /\ i _ 7295,00 PROPOSED MOUND -I - -� V) LOT B-6 7291.00 � - - . RI RAP WITH 12"-18"0 R TO FLOODPLAIN. / , 7?8p .-_ (7287 7 APPR XIMATE EXISTIN O L) \ / 7263.00 - _- _ -SLOE = 3:1 �� > F / \ 7279.00 - �-RIP -RA ':I °� w D - - DATUhf ELEV 12•-18•0 oGK. =o - - - o 7275.00 0.00 40.00 80.OQ 120.00 160.00 w a \ �0 / GROUP SECTION MIL PVC UN R IIII ALONG SIDE FACING. � SECTION A VERTICAL SCALE = 1" = 20' � 9 FLOODPLAIN. 1 1 / Sp l /� SECTION A -A d, FR MIN. (SEE DETAIL) � Z / VICINITY EXISTING 50C GAL DOSING / M' `P TANK, TO BE MOVED ;' y9ti/ " " M a: w �a I - / REPLACE WITH NEW _ ip• l MIN, / 4X.4-� TREATED ELEC.JCT. BOX SCALE: 1" = 2000' _ ---- -. 1000 GAL DOSING TANK. Se IBACk : POST - s 2". AIR VENT RISER(S) TOW GROUND SURFACE °j Ii Q I m I / MOVE EXISTING 500 GAL 'I CAULK/SEAL WELL 2" FEEDER LINE TO AT INLET E)LL I J 1997 - 4 N \' JJ_ DOSING TANK AND CONNECT / /TO OUTLET OF EXISTING i -! / / / 1/BD PER FT. `, SHALL DRAIN BACK TO TANK AFTER - - ENVY?GP �' "'"•�' ASPDN l ril'NN Z SEPTIC TANK. / / ;. �' EACH PUMP CYCLE. Li GENERAL NOTES Q 1 . ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE P I TK I N COUNTY Dc a rn "ALARM" REGULATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, EVEN THOUGH W I E :� /' QUICK DISCONNECT ALL SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. N / p "/ / OR UNION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH SPECIFIC DETAILS W / ExlsnNclz GA y`� \ SEPTIC TAI20 GA a AS ARE REFERRED TO IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED REGULATIONS. Ld O Y U Q m LI LL .. (REMOVE/ BAF�CE) / /,'It', y� •oN" 2. FLOW: 3 BEDROOMS *2 PERSONS/BEDROOM *100 GALLONS/PERSON/DAY IS COIL AND TIE AN , ,/ t' _ ADDITIONAL 10' OF 600 GPD = AVERAGE DAILY FLOW. 1 A WEIGHT WIRE FOR PUMP _ REMOVAL DESIGN = 1.75* AVERAGE = 1050 GPD LOT�� r 0 SUBMERSIBLE WASTEWATER PUMP SEPTI C TANK : MINIMUM TOTAL TANK SIZE: 1050 GPD 1DAY/24 HRS 30 / tio,TO OFF" L l ° 00 I O O SET PUMP APPROX. OFF FLOOR * * HRS = 1313 GAL, NEXT STD. SIZE = 1500 GAL tttQQq \ SINc,LE-STOP. FRAME V8" < / / ° v a MINIMUM GRAVEL BASE AREA: A -Q = 1105 SQ . FT . / ( HOUSE WITH WAUE OUT ` \ 0.95 ✓ I / / BASEMENT L / 1 NOTES:N(I N I MUM SAND FILL BASE AREA: A = 1050 GPD = 1313 SQ . FT . ' �� 1. SWITCHES TO BE MERCURY FLOAT TYPE. 2. FLOAT SWITCH DIMENSIONS ARE BASED ON A COPELAND 1000 GAL. TANK. , 0.80 GPD/SQ. FT. / I (CISTERN) / XIS ETING WELL / \ DOSING TANK SHALL BE OF WATERTIGHT CONSTRUCTION. 3. 4. ALARM SHALL BE BOTH AUDIBLE AND VISIBLE, LOCATED WITHIN QQ ( / EXISTING I 10' UTILITY EASEMENT , ) / / THE HOUSE AND ON A CIRCUIT SEPARATE FROM THE. PUMP. 5. PUMP SHALL BE CAPABLE OF AT LEAST 42 GPM ® 15 FT. OF HEAD. 3. TOPSOIL: SOIL EXCAVATED FROM SITE ACCEPTABLE IF NO CLAY IS PRESENT. \ (ELEVATION DIFFERENCE AND PIPE LENGTHS SHALL BE FIELD MEASURED BY W CONTRACTOR AND REFERRED To ENGINEER FOR VERIFICATION of PUMP PARAMETERS.) 4. VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IS PROHIBITED ON THE FIELD. 7� (�O► DOSING TANK ARRANGEMENT 5. CLEANOUTS ARE REQUIRED AT ALL BENDS AND AT LEAST EVERY 100 iE S(TE -PLAN / / / N.T.S. FEET ALONG THE HOUSE SEWER. _ - � 6. INSTALL RISERS AS NECESSARY TO BRING ALL ACCESS POINTS TO WITHIN 1/2 -FOOT OF FINAL GRADE . APPROXIMATE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE 7. LOCATIONS OF ALL COMPONENTS MAY BE VARIED AS NECESSARY AS LONG 46' MIN. BED OF 1 1/2" SCREENED AS ALL MINIMUM DISTANCES AND SLOPES MEET THOSE REQUIRED. B INSPECTION WELL (TYP.) (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) �" ROCK, 12" THICK //�//�/�\ r \\� 8 . PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM � i0 MIN. 1' /��// ABSORPTION AREA USING DRAINAGE SWALES AS NECESSARY. SLOPE 10 MIL PVC LINER DRAIN TOPSOIL /� FILTER FABRIC - g, PERCOLATION TESTING BY HCE PERSONNEL INDICATED PERCOLATION �( - /\/� RATES IN EXCESS OF 5 MIN/IN. 3' TYP J 3' TYP 3 - RIP RAP ON WEST AND SOUTH 1 �- __ _ 10. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN I SDS PERMIT. PERMIT MUST 6' O.C. SLOPE To FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION. o BE OBTAINED FROM APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY OFFICIALS. - WITH 12" - 18" 0 ROCK. - 12" MIN J a 6". - 2:1 to 3:1 SAND SLOPE - FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION 11 . THIS SYSTEM IS SIZED FOR TYPICAL DOMESTIC .WASTES ONLY. BACKWASH OR 24' 6 O.C. a "SOLID PV FROM DOSING TANK 200) ////�\///\/////%\ 24 Mw SAND FILL - SEE NOTES \ \ \ \ \ \ \�//\�//\�//\�//\`//\�/i FOR MINIMUM BASE AREA. FLUSHING FLOWS FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS UNITS OR WATER SOFTENERS OR FILTERS SHOULD NOT BE INTRODUCED INTO THIS SYSTEM. MIN. (CLASS APPROXIMATE j EXISTING GROUND SURFACE TOP OF SAND TO BE AT. LEAST NER BURIED 1' MIN. DISTRIBUTION LATERALS 48" ABOVE GROUND WATER - I IN UNEXCEVATED SOIL_ -. 24• 12. THE SAND MUST BE THOROUGHLY SETTLED BY FLOODING OR OTHER MEANS BEFORE THE DISTRIBUTORS ARE PLACED AT THE FINAL GRADE. 6' 0. C. 1-1/2BED PIPES GRANULAR Flll AS STRIP TOPSOIL UNDER MOUND AND m (PERFORATED PVC) NECESSARY TO ELEVATE REPLACE WITH GRANULAR MATERIAL, Y TO FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION. SAND IN EXISTING SYSTEM MAY BE USED. 13. SAND USED SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: p .J m OF GRAVEL"BED SECTION B -B EDGE SIEVE SIZE %PASSING s N.T.S. 4 100 10-100 Of o m -1 o <a B !�40 GRAVEL BED PLAN 200 0-3 �" ° N.T.S. SLOPE NO PERFORATION /- ON END PIPES REMOVABLE CAP UNIFORMITY COEFF I C I ENT=D7/D,m-4 z =o SD m CONCRETE SAND AND MASONRY SAND WILL/BOTH GENERALLY MEET THESE CRITERIA. = Q z•m we s' TIP. 4 - 1/2"0 HOLES p U . H s 4 DRILL CENTER FOR ENTIRE ON CENTER - � 1 4.� LOT BOUNDARIES AND STRUCTURES SHOWNI" ON THIS DRAWING ARE APPROXIMATE AND 0 LENGTH OF ALL LATERALS -/�\/ /�/, ARE NOT NECESSARILY THE EXACT LOCATIONOF STRUCTURES..) INFORMATION FROM I Jw 1-1/2• PVC LATERALS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY' BY LINES N SPACE, 11-15-88NOTE: o a `OpE ' SOLID PIPE UST ALL PIPING MDRAIN 15. VEGETATIVE COVER OVER SAND FILTER SHALL BE BLUEGRASS TYPE SOD AND/ OR SLOPE 'BACK TO DOSING TANKSMALL - .. SHRUBS - T 4e� CROSS PLACED ON DISTRIBUTION PIPE _ Wm 4e SOLID CAP FOR z x 2" TEE \�'�• - SUPPORT ® BOTTOM O PERFORATED PIPE of TRENCH OR BED 2.0 PVC HOLES ON BOTTOM MIN". OF LATERAL o GRAPHIC SCALE - Ab' PROJECT NO. 2• SOLID CL200 PVC OR 20 0 10 20 40 80 1 1 1 1 1 1- 200 PSI POLYETHYLENE 51.OPE - /.//i/ 97W4.22 FROM DOSING TANK NO PERFORATION LATERAL PIPE LAYOUT COMBINATION AIR VENT & IN FEET > ON END PIPES WELL DETAIL R - I. inch = 20 Pt.. SHEET r (FOR PRESSURE DOSING OF FIELD) INSPECTION N.T.S. N.T.S. OF 1 m w HIGH WATER LINE 30' OFFSET FROM PROPERTY UNE \ \ - . 10' OFFSET FROM PROPERTY \ y LINE PROPERTY LINE - __ SUBJ \ PROPOSED MOUND . ' (APPROXIMATE FOOTPRINT) \ PROPOSED MOUND 7295.00t- - EXISTING ROAD CL g SITE e rn W \ LOT B-V RI RAP WITH 12"-18"0 i' T 7291.00 - APPR XIMATE EXISTIN 0 Z o \ ` R FLOODPLAIN. 7290 7287.00 = 3:1 O \ / 7283.00 ,SLO-E ---iiIP-SAP 7279.00 Li o _. DATUM ELEV 12"-1a"m POCK. a Of I 7275.000.00 40.00 80.00 N 120.00 160.00 _ a 1 \ I / GROUP SECTION A , SECTION VERTICAL SCALE = 1" = 20' 3 SO.M,N l SECTION A-A g FRG LINE ` I 3z / � ; VICINITY MAP EXISTING 500 GAL DOSING 0 / ,L9�' �w TANK, TO BE MOVED - ( 4" X 4- / BOX SCALE: 1" = 2000' =a I REPLACE WITH NEW Mhy TREATED POST 1000 GAL DOSING TANK. SE \ / I$gCk 2" AIR VENT r { [a 1 / RISER(S) ` `'t��C i l� w \\ \ LGROUND FACE -/L WELL 2" FEEDER LINE TO iN DEQ 'i X997 j p I N / MOVE EXISTING 500 GAL I / DOSING TANK AND CONNECT /• / _� / �FIELD, SLOPED AT INLET 1/8" PER FT. MIN. SHALL DRAIN BACK j FNV!r'"- 1 HEALTH O TO OUTLET OF EXISTING / TO TANK AFTER 7 ., _I � Z SEPTIC TANK. / - EACH PUMP CYCLE. GENERAL NOTES � rn - � ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE P I TK I N COUNTY 1.D aF- "ALARM" REGULATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS , EVEN THOUGH w ! E QUICK DISCONNECT ALL SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. N (/� o / f OR UNION / THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH SPECIFIC DETAILS ,, EXISTING 1250 GAL SEPTIC TANK (REMQ)E B LE) o \ ( ° AS ARE REFERRED TO IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED REGULATIONS. LJ p K p Y Q W X /: o I / "ON" COIL AND TIE AN - 2. FLOW: 3 BEDROOMS *2 PERSONS/BEDROOM *100 GALLONS/PERSON/DAY IS ADDITIONAL 10' OF 600 GPD = AVERAGE DAILY FLOW. I PUMP WEIGH REMOV AL G DESIGN = 1.75* AVERAGE = 1050 GPD I/ / LOT�� ( 0 SUBMERSIBLE WASTEWATER PUMP / "OFF" SEPTIC TANK: MINIMUM TOTAL TANK SIZE: 1050 GPD * 1DAY/24 HRS * 30 HRS = 1313 GAL, NEXT STD. SIZE = 1500 GAL / � � ETOFF U O O S100 FLOOR MINIMUM MINIMUM GRAVEL BASE AREA: 2 SINGLE-STOR FRAME ^ n " A Q = 1105 SQ.FT. w� \ ' HOUBASEMEN[ WALKOUT �I / \ �/ �1 - NOTES: 0.95 _ MINIMUM_ SAND FILL AREA: A = 1050 GPD --1313 SQ. FT. m 8 MR 1. SWITCHES TO BE MERCURY FLOAT TYPE.` _B_ASE _ 0.80 GPD/SQ . F T. ¢ LCL 2. FLOATSWITCH DIMENSIONS ARE BASED ON A- COPELAND 1000 GAL. TANK. W (CISTERN) r EXISTING WELL I EXISTING 10' UTILITY EASEMENT \ ; 3. DOSING TANK SHALL BE OF WATERTIGHT CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALARM SHALL BE BOTH. AUDIBLE AND VISIBLE, LOCATED WITHIN THE HOUSE AND ON A CIRCUIT SEPARATE FROM THE PUMP. � / `) 8 5. PUMP SHALL BE CAPABLE OF AT LEAST 42 GPM ® 15 FT. OF HEAD. 3. TOPSOIL : SOIL EXCAVATED FROM SITE ACCEPTABLE IF NO CLAY IS PRESENT. m� (ELEVATION DIFFERENCE AND PIPE LENGTHS SHALL BE FIELD MEASURED BY CONTRACTOR AND REFERRED TO ENGINEER FOR VERIFICATION OF PUMP PARAMETERS.) ^O 4. VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IS PROHIBITED ON THE FIELD. a! DOSING TANK ARRANGEMENT 5. CLEANOUTS ARE REQUIRED AT ALL BENDS AND AT LEAST EVERY 100 � NTs FEET ALONG THE HOUSE SEWER. �PLAN SITE / 6. INSTALL RISERS AS NECESSARY TO BRING ALL ACCESS POINTS TO WITHIN 1/2-FOOT OF FINAL GRADE. 7. LOCATIONS OF ALL COMPONENTS MAY BE VARIED AS NECESSARY AS LONG -- 46' MIN. APPROXIMATE AS ALL MINIMUM DISTANCES AND SLOPES MEET THOSE REQUIRED. g INSPECTION WELL (TYP.) (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) EXISTING GROUND SURFACE / 8. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM ABSORPTION AREA USING DRAINAGE SWALES AS NECESSARY. > 1 - BED OF1 1 /2" SCREENED = \ \\\,�\\����\ ROCK, 12" THICK \///i/' 9. PERCOLATION TESTING BY HCE PERSONNEL INDICATED PERCOLATION (1 MIN. I' //�//\\ RATES IN EXCESS OF 5 MIN/IN. 3' TYP SLOPE To - DRAIN TOPSOIL / /� FILTER FABRIC 3' TYP RAP 10. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN 15DS PERMIT. PERMIT MUST 6' 0. C. FRIP LOODPLASNOELEVATION. r \ \ \ \ �\ / /\ \/\/\/ BE OBTAINED FROM APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY OFFICIALS. I1 \ 1 �- APPROXIMATE ° ° 11. THIS SYSTEM IS SIZED FOR TYPICAL DOMESTIC WASTES ONLY. BACKWASH OR I EXISTING -GROUND 12" MIN J 6" FLUSHING FLOWS FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS UNITS OR WATER SOFTENERS OR 2" SOLID PVC FROM DOSING TANK 24 6' 0. C. MIN. I (CLASS 200) SURFACE 2:1 to 3:1 SAND SLOPE FILTERS SHOULD NOT BE INTRODUCED INTO THIS SYSTEM. Z 24" MIN SAND FlLL -SEE NOTES 12. THE SAND MUST BE THOROUGHLY SETTLED BY FLOODING OR OTHER MEANS W� f- 1-1/2" BED PIPES /\\�/\j/ FOR MINIMUM BASE AREA. /\/\\/\\�\\�\�\\\ NGROUONDEA�tREAST BEFORE THE DISTRIBUTORS ARE PLACED AT. THE FINAL GRADE. [j)6' 0. C. (PERFORATED PVC) DISTRIBUTION LATERALS 48P ABOVE p STRIP TOPSOIL UNDER MOUND AND _ 24' 13. SAD USED SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: pp -1 m EDGE OF GRAVEL' BED REPLACE WITH GRANULAR MATERIAL, SECTION B - B SAND IN EXISTING SYSTEM MAY BE USED. - SIEVE SIZE %PASSING < 0 m 4 100 of 0 IL N.T.s. 40 10-100 uj o to 10 B GRAVEL BED PLAN 200 0-3 w ca Z U Q N.T.S. oPE No PERFORATION ON E"° PIPES UNIFORMITY I TY COEFF I C I ENT=D /D 4 H W cp _ 1 REMOVABLE CAP CONCRETE SAND AND MASONRY SAND WILL BOTH GENERALLY MEET THESE CRI TER I A.z m 4- 1/2"0 HOLES p 00 3 Z DRILL HOLES 2"0 PVC s' TYP. 14. LOT BOUNDARIES AND STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THIS .DRAWING ARE APPROXI MATE AND Z Co CENTER IRE LE CENTER FOR ENTIRE - LENGTH of ALL LATERALS /�\/ /\/,• - ARE NOT NECESSARILY THE EXACT LOCATION OF STRUCTURES. `l O --_ J J W 1-1/2" PVC LATERALS INFORMATION FROM IMPROVEMENT SURVEY BY LINES I N SPACE, 11-15-88 a ? SCOPE E SOLID PIPE - 15. VEGETATIVE COVER OVER. SAND FILTER SHALL BE BLUEGRASS TYPE SOD AND/ OR O SLOPE ALL PIPING MUST DRAIN BACK TO DOSING TANK- CROSS PLACED ON SMALL SHRUBS. WW a$" DISTRIBUTION PIPE - Z CAP FOR 2"x z' TEE X1SOLID 48 SUPPORT 0 BOTTOM o OF TRENCH OR BLD PERFORATED PIPE GRAPHIC SCALE 2.0 PVC HOLES ON BOTTOM OF LATERAL 46 M,N PROJECT N0. / za o ,o zo ao eo 2' SOLID CL200 PVC OR 200 PSI POLYETHYLENE SLOPE /�' // %/�� n �" �JtJ"►'22 FROM DOSING TANK AIR VENT & ( IN FEET ) NO PERFORATION) LATERAL PIPE. LAYOUT COMBINATION _ ON END PIPES 1 inch = 20 ft. -SHEET (FOR PRESSURE DOSING OF FIELD) INSPECTION WELL DETAIL o ; 1 N.T.S. N. T. OF 1 W cc LI -2 -7 i rn y k -17 \ f �� \ \ Cl - IV s8• \ \ \ PROPOSED MOUND (APPROXIMATE FOOTPRINT) --\, \ , 11-Np [x ?S I \ \ \ s *z D 020 D V -S r LOT B-6 / 5 Pn° N 1<� arc SysrrS p•c"� I � � �PR1�.165� 1 reR-t 6A�rtDa C, Oti"S5 EXISTING 500 GAL DOSING�J$tLL pp9uJAYj� TANK, TO BE MOVED - / j>lzy C> N LH >✓S —_--J REPLACE WITH NEW \ 1000 GAL DODNG TANK. / SfTeq�K (1T1i�.vZ "[�•IAI►J ate / MOVE EXISTING 500 GAL DOSII;G TANK AND / o CONNECT TO OUTLET OF EXIS"ING SEPTIC TANK / Q� / o f, EXISTING 1250 GAL 1 SEPTIC TANK (REMOVE E+FELE)CCaMo�} / DI's�j06 �v � � v�cw K� WE 17 ��� ` 3 LOT B-WrtLL r / o , 10 SINGLE-S-uRY FRAME b HOUSE NI'��� WALKOUT n BAS -m, -NT / \✓/ EXISTING WELL � \ J ! / EXISTING 10' UTILITY EASEMENT L L SITE PLAN I- 2"0 PVC J 2" SOLID CL200 PVC OR 200 PSI POLYETHYLENE FROM DOSING TANK AJ ON END PIPES GRAVEL BED PLAN N.T.S. DRILL 1/4'6 HOLES 48" ON CFNTFR FOR FNTIRF NO PERFORATION ON END PIPES 3 pa wv GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft_ 4"X4" TREATED—ELEC. JCT. BOX POST RISER(S) TO GROUND SURFACE CAULK/SEAL WELL INLET � a " " z N^ 2" AIR VENT 2" FEEDER LINE TO FIELD, SLOPED AT 1/8" PER FT. MIN. SHALL DRAIN BACK TO TANK AFTER EACH PUMP CYCLE. QUICK DISCONNECT OR UNION "ON" COIL AND TIE AN ADDITIONAL 10' OF WEIGHT WIRE FOR PUMP 4. `V REMOVAL SUBMERSIBLE WASTEWATER PUMP e "OFF" SET PUMP APPROX. 8" OFF FLOOR 4 a NOTE5i 1. SWITCHES TO BE MERCURY FLOAT TYPE. 2. FLOAT SWITCH DIMENSIONS ARE BASED ON A COPELAND 1000 GAL.. TANK. (CISTERN) 3. DOSING TANK SHALL BE OF WATERTIGHT CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALARM SHALL BE BOTH AUDIBLE AND VISIBLE, LOCATED WITHIN THE HOUSE AND ON A CIRCUIT SEPARATE FROM THE PUMP. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PITKIN COUNTY REGULATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, EVEN THOUGH ALL SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH SPECIFIC DETAILS AS ARE REFERRED TO IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED REGULATIONS. 2. FLOW: 3 BEDROOMS *2 PERSONS/BEDROOM *100 GALLONS/PERSON/DAY IS 600 GPD = AVERAGE DAILY FLOW. DESIGN = 1.75* AVERAGE = 1050 GPD SEPTIC TANK: MINIMUM TOTAL TANK SIZE: 1050 GPD * 1DAY/24 HRS * 30 HRS = 1313 GAL, NEXT STD. SIZE = 1500 GAL MINIMUM GRAVEL BASE AREA: A = Q = 1105 SQ.FT. 0.95 MINIMUM SAND FILL BASE AREA: A = 1050 GPD = 131�FT. 0.80 GPD/SQ. FT. 5. PUMP SHALL BE CAPABLE OF AT LEAST 42 GPM 0 15 FT. OF HEAD. 3. TOPSO I L: SOIL EXCAVATED FROM SITE ACCEPTABLE IF NO CLAY IS (ELEVATION DIFFERENCE AND PIPE LENGTHS SHALL BE FIELD MEASURED BY - PRESENT. CONTRACTOR AND REFERRED TO ENGINEER FOR VERIFICATION OF PUMP PARAMETERS.) 4. VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IS PROHIBITED ON THE FIELD. DOSING TANK ARRANGEMENT 5. CLEANOUTS ARE REQUIRED AT ALL BENDS AND AT LEAST EVERY 100 N.T.S. FEET ALONG THE HOUSE SEWER. BED OF 1 1/2" SCREENED ROCK, 12" THICK SLOPE TO MIN. 1' ,u TOPSOIL APPROXIMATE / EXISTING GROUND Eb° 12" MIN SURFACE 1 � 24" MIN DISTRIBUTION LATERALS STRIP TOPSOIL UNDER MOUND AND REPLACE WITH GRANULAR MATERIAL, SAND IN EXISTING SYSTEM MAY BE USED. SLOPE TO FILTER FABRIC DRAIN j 10 SAND FILL.- SEE NOTES FOR MINIMUM BASE AREA. TOP OF SAND TO BE AT LEAST 48" ABOVE GROUND WATER 24' SECTION A -A N.T.S. REMOVABLE CAP 4 - 1/2"0 HOLES 6. , WITHIN 1/2 -FOOT OF FINAL GRADE. 7. LI -2 -7 i rn y k -17 \ f �� \ \ Cl - IV s8• \ \ \ PROPOSED MOUND (APPROXIMATE FOOTPRINT) --\, \ , 11-Np [x ?S I \ \ \ s *z D 020 D V -S r LOT B-6 / 5 Pn° N 1<� arc SysrrS p•c"� I � � �PR1�.165� 1 reR-t 6A�rtDa C, Oti"S5 EXISTING 500 GAL DOSING�J$tLL pp9uJAYj� TANK, TO BE MOVED - / j>lzy C> N LH >✓S —_--J REPLACE WITH NEW \ 1000 GAL DODNG TANK. / SfTeq�K (1T1i�.vZ "[�•IAI►J ate / MOVE EXISTING 500 GAL DOSII;G TANK AND / o CONNECT TO OUTLET OF EXIS"ING SEPTIC TANK / Q� / o f, EXISTING 1250 GAL 1 SEPTIC TANK (REMOVE E+FELE)CCaMo�} / DI's�j06 �v � � v�cw K� WE 17 ��� ` 3 LOT B-WrtLL r / o , 10 SINGLE-S-uRY FRAME b HOUSE NI'��� WALKOUT n BAS -m, -NT / \✓/ EXISTING WELL � \ J ! / EXISTING 10' UTILITY EASEMENT L L SITE PLAN I- 2"0 PVC J 2" SOLID CL200 PVC OR 200 PSI POLYETHYLENE FROM DOSING TANK AJ ON END PIPES GRAVEL BED PLAN N.T.S. DRILL 1/4'6 HOLES 48" ON CFNTFR FOR FNTIRF NO PERFORATION ON END PIPES 3 pa wv GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft_ 4"X4" TREATED—ELEC. JCT. BOX POST RISER(S) TO GROUND SURFACE CAULK/SEAL WELL INLET � a " " z N^ 2" AIR VENT 2" FEEDER LINE TO FIELD, SLOPED AT 1/8" PER FT. MIN. SHALL DRAIN BACK TO TANK AFTER EACH PUMP CYCLE. QUICK DISCONNECT OR UNION "ON" COIL AND TIE AN ADDITIONAL 10' OF WEIGHT WIRE FOR PUMP 4. `V REMOVAL SUBMERSIBLE WASTEWATER PUMP e "OFF" SET PUMP APPROX. 8" OFF FLOOR 4 a NOTE5i 1. SWITCHES TO BE MERCURY FLOAT TYPE. 2. FLOAT SWITCH DIMENSIONS ARE BASED ON A COPELAND 1000 GAL.. TANK. (CISTERN) 3. DOSING TANK SHALL BE OF WATERTIGHT CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALARM SHALL BE BOTH AUDIBLE AND VISIBLE, LOCATED WITHIN THE HOUSE AND ON A CIRCUIT SEPARATE FROM THE PUMP. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PITKIN COUNTY REGULATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, EVEN THOUGH ALL SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH SPECIFIC DETAILS AS ARE REFERRED TO IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED REGULATIONS. 2. FLOW: 3 BEDROOMS *2 PERSONS/BEDROOM *100 GALLONS/PERSON/DAY IS 600 GPD = AVERAGE DAILY FLOW. DESIGN = 1.75* AVERAGE = 1050 GPD SEPTIC TANK: MINIMUM TOTAL TANK SIZE: 1050 GPD * 1DAY/24 HRS * 30 HRS = 1313 GAL, NEXT STD. SIZE = 1500 GAL MINIMUM GRAVEL BASE AREA: A = Q = 1105 SQ.FT. 0.95 MINIMUM SAND FILL BASE AREA: A = 1050 GPD = 131�FT. 0.80 GPD/SQ. FT. 5. PUMP SHALL BE CAPABLE OF AT LEAST 42 GPM 0 15 FT. OF HEAD. 3. TOPSO I L: SOIL EXCAVATED FROM SITE ACCEPTABLE IF NO CLAY IS (ELEVATION DIFFERENCE AND PIPE LENGTHS SHALL BE FIELD MEASURED BY - PRESENT. CONTRACTOR AND REFERRED TO ENGINEER FOR VERIFICATION OF PUMP PARAMETERS.) 4. VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IS PROHIBITED ON THE FIELD. DOSING TANK ARRANGEMENT 5. CLEANOUTS ARE REQUIRED AT ALL BENDS AND AT LEAST EVERY 100 N.T.S. FEET ALONG THE HOUSE SEWER. BED OF 1 1/2" SCREENED ROCK, 12" THICK SLOPE TO MIN. 1' ,u TOPSOIL APPROXIMATE / EXISTING GROUND Eb° 12" MIN SURFACE 1 � 24" MIN DISTRIBUTION LATERALS STRIP TOPSOIL UNDER MOUND AND REPLACE WITH GRANULAR MATERIAL, SAND IN EXISTING SYSTEM MAY BE USED. SLOPE TO FILTER FABRIC DRAIN j 10 SAND FILL.- SEE NOTES FOR MINIMUM BASE AREA. TOP OF SAND TO BE AT LEAST 48" ABOVE GROUND WATER 24' SECTION A -A N.T.S. REMOVABLE CAP 4 - 1/2"0 HOLES SOLID PIPE INFORMATION FROM IMPROVEMENT SURVEY BY LINES IN SPACE, 11-15-88 CROSS PLACED ON 15. VEGETATIVE COVER OVER SAND FILTER SHALL BE BLUEGRASS TYPE SOD AND/ OR DISTRIBUTION PIPE SMALL SHRUBS. SOLID CAP FOR SUPPORT 0 BOTTOM 0 PERFORATED PIPE OF TRENCH OR BED O COMBINATION AIR VENT & INSPECTION WELL DETAIL N.T.S. z 6. INSTALL RISERS AS NECESSARY TO BRING ALL ACCESS POINTS TO WITHIN 1/2 -FOOT OF FINAL GRADE. 7. LOCATIONS OF ALL COMPONENTS MAY BE VARIED AS NECESSARY AS LONG U) AS ALL MINIMUM DISTANCES AND SLOPES MEET THOSE REQUIRED. 8. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM ABSORPTION AREA USING DRAINAGE SWALES AS NECESSARY. 9. PERCOLATION TESTING BY HCE PERSONNEL INDICATED PERCOLATION RATES IN EXCESS OF 5 MIN/IN. 10. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ISDS PERMIT. PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY OFFICIALS. 3 H 11. THIS SYSTEM IS SIZED FOR TYPICAL DOMESTIC WASTES ONLY. BACKWASH OR ISAND:SLOPE Q FLUSHING FLOWS FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS UNITS OR WA 1 to 3:1 FILTERS SHOULD NOT BE INTRODUCED INTO THIS SYSTEM. O 12. THE SAND MUST BE THOROUGHLY SETTLED BY FLOODING OR OTHER MEANS BEFORE THE DISTRIBUTORS ARE PLACED AT THE FINAL GRADE. z 13. SAND USED SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: SIEVE SIZE %PASSING n 4 100 40 10-100 0) (D 200 0-3 UNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT=Dw/D10�4 CL CONCRETE SAND AND MASONRY SAND WILL BOTH GENERALLY MEET THESE CRITERIA. 14. LOT BOUNDARIES AND STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY THE EXACT LOCATION OF STRUCTURES. SOLID PIPE INFORMATION FROM IMPROVEMENT SURVEY BY LINES IN SPACE, 11-15-88 CROSS PLACED ON 15. VEGETATIVE COVER OVER SAND FILTER SHALL BE BLUEGRASS TYPE SOD AND/ OR DISTRIBUTION PIPE SMALL SHRUBS. SOLID CAP FOR SUPPORT 0 BOTTOM 0 PERFORATED PIPE OF TRENCH OR BED O COMBINATION AIR VENT & INSPECTION WELL DETAIL N.T.S. z 0 U) W H Q O O z n 0) (D I CL w E r N ujN I— J Ld Y Q E 0 0 -J m Q a �_ mW LdU Zm LLJ O Q U Q mU ou Cl) <z Q �zCo~LC J _W a Q z Z (r III PROJECTNO. 9700422 SHEET 1 OF 1