The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.96.12 PITHIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADNSTMENT DATE ~Y 13, 1996 CASE # ~~n'-~ REPRESENTATIVE Harry Teacrue Architects PHONE 925-2556 MAII,INGADDRESS 412 North Mill St., Astten. CO 81hll OWNER Leslie Strawbridge/Chuck l~stivo PHONE 927-1499 MAILING ADDRESS P. O. Box 587. Basalt CO 81621 LOCATION OF PROPERTY Parcel 6 , West Sopris Creek Subdivision Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of this Case. The Board may return this application if it does not contaj~n all the facts in question. 11 n ~ ~~ Owner's Sib ature (To be completed by the Zoning Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: Requesting: ' Front Yard Setback Vaziance, where ' is required. 'Rear Yazd Setback Variance, where ' is required. _ Side Yard Setback Variance, where _' is required. _ Side Yazd Setback Variance, where ~_' is required. / 5 ~0.n;J `/ ~ 'Height Variancegwhere ~{~' is t a//o~;~~ ~~ Squaze Feet where a maximum of _ sq. ft. is allowed. Other: U~l'> 3 (i Zone District Lot Size Zoning Official' ~ -u(~.,~.~a~ ;_, `~L`sr~ ~ ~ ~„ o .. Application filed fi- I ~-yro Parcel ID No. ayty~ - ?~(~~ - r~'~~C'~['a~ Date of Meeting jp- tj-~[a `- Notices Mailed ~- ,23 - `jjg Secretary ~ ~ ~ ~ih ~ ®.~~~n .--, BEFORE THE PITI{IN COUNTY BOARD OF ADNSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance aze invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AREAS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: Location of meeting: Owner: Owner's Address: Property Location or Description: May 7, 1996 at 5:15 p.m. Meeting Room, Pitkin County Library 120 N. Mill, Aspen Leslie Strawbridge & Charles Restivo P.O. Box 587 Basalt, CO 81621 Parcel 6, West Sopris Creek Subdivision Requesting approval fora 13' and a 4' Height Variance, where 20' is required in the RS-30 Zone District, for the construction of a single family residence. VARIANCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. Duration of Variance: Temporary _ Permanent ~ l1 ~A R R Y ,,,.~, ,..~ T E A G u c C May 13, 1996 Aspen/Pitkin County Community Developement Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear County Board of Adjustment, Leslie Strawbridge and Chuck Restivo came to us with a unique request: to design a 2,500 s.f. house, powered by photovoltaic energy, taking advantage of passive solar heat, sited on a east facing slope. To meet these goals we are requesting a height limit adjustment from 20 feet defined by the 1041 Approval Resolution # 95 - 146 to the county standard of 28 feet. Based on our previous experience in Pitkin County and past interpretations of building height as it pertains to shed roofs, we originally believed that this building was in conformance. The problem occurred when the highest poinUpeak of the roof was classified by the Planning Office as an eave. This reading forced our building to be treated as if it were a flat roof, where as it has a distinct slope. The 20 foot height limit was established by the Planning Department in response to The Department of Wildlife's concern when initially reviewing the property for the 1041 approval. The D.O.W. wanted to minimize the visual impact of the structure from the north where elk frequent the property. At no time did the D.O.W. determine a specific height limit. On 5/13/96 we met with Kevin Wright of the Department of Wildlife and discussed the residence and his initial concerns. Upon reviewing the model and submitted drawings, Mr. Wright felt that the proposed residence is low in profile and has no ill effect on the wildlife. He felt the portion of the main shed roof and the peaked top of the east roof were acceptable as proposed, even though they exceed 20 feet. ,.,, ~, Aspen/Pitkin County Community Developement Department May 13, 1996 Page 2 The D.O.W. was looking for a house that was low in profile and had minimal impact towards the north of the building envelope. The north elevation has minimal windows for heat loss and results in minimal light pollution in the evenings. There are no decks or doors that open out to the north in response to this concern. Now that this modest two story house is designed, it is possible to clearly view its impacts on the site. We hope the attached information and exhibits clearly define our project and make a case for the variance we are requesting. ~a~~r"'~tlt3 05/10/96 16:18 FAX 970x963 2616 MOVIHLAND n f~J03 Ad'acent Land Owners West Sopxis Ranch Strawbridge/Restivo May 10, 1996 Lot 4 David Bork 1600 Stone Road Basalt, CO 81621 Bork Institute for Family Business 117 AABC Aspen, CO 81611 Lots 3 & 8 Lauren Graves P.O. Box 1955 Alexander City, AL 35011 Lot 5 Anna May Griffiths 10080 W. 8th Piace Lakewood, CO 80215 C.~~:ela 0l.{~~r BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitldn County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolurion. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and stau their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, parricularly if you have objection to such varianec, as the Board of Adjusmtent will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and other; affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: Locarion of meeting: Owner: Owner's Address: Property Location or Description: May 7, 1996 at 5:15 p.m. Meeting Room, Pitkin County Library 120 N. Mill, Aspen Leslie Strawbridge & Charles Restivo P.0. Box 587 Basalt. CO 81621 Parcel 6, West Sopris Creek Subdivision Requesting approval fora 13' and a 4' Height Variance, where 20' is required in the RS-30 Zone District, for the construction of a single family residence. VARL1:~iCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUESTED COULD BE GRAi~IT'ED. Duration of Variance: Temporary _ Permanent ~ ~itkin County Develognent Departsrnstt thh Galena Street bD 81611 i'=A~er~(1~ ~4 David Bork r'•e~ ° 1600 Stone Road ,~ Basalt, OJ 816: 9~c~~~9' q~l Strawbr'~ige / Restivo Vicinity /Directional Map Parcel 6 of the West Sopris Creek Subdlvlsion $.B9° 0533 ~~E FOUND; N°.S REBAR ~ - 5.68°. 54~42~~E. B PLAB. CAP P L.3. 20303 ~__-____ 100'SET9ACK I i/ ~ / ~I^xoa~sy ~Hp ~a eve a it eo°xszc~A.n ue ea m /~ ~ ~i~GRPVEL N~AD Location of the sign y w V u~ O FOUND N N /P. 6B LF~CLO/ FOUND' No.6 gEeAq (BENTI 1317. 76~ - -~ a W 0 150 300 600 900 ~I :, - -_ n SCALE: I'~= 300 FT. N ~ BASIS OF BEARING: FOUND MONUMENTS A: ~eax V/FCGL 6 AF61 OF TOPOGHAPNY °ELL fo40/Nu I NV.`r Off. I I _ - 15 UTILITY E~'EMENL _- - !~ 50'_GET BACK ~_ _ 5.88°57 Ofi E. 1317.11 II I I W y .~ I cJ I O c: o~ z f0UN0'Na.S REBAR J / PLAS. CAP / P.L.S. 2w3D3 \. 1 \. LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OP LAND SITVATED IN THE W 1/2 OF SECTION 22, T. S S., R. 87 W., OP THE 6th P.M. MORE PARTICVLARLY DESCRIBED AS POLLOWS: __ BEGINNING AT THE NW CORNER OF 9AID SECTION 22, THENCE S 0 59' 02" W. 3510.10 FEET TO THE TRVE POINT OP BEGINNING, THENCE S. E8 54' 42" E. 1317.76 FEET, THENCE S. 1 00' 46" W. 1283.76 FEET, THENCE N 88 57. 06" W. 1317.11 PEET, THENCE N 0 59' 02" E. 1248.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. COVNTY OF PSTRIN, STATE OF COLORADO. / ~ !_/~' /'; ~ ~/ r ~~~ l r -, ~ I rte--` ;r ,~" ' ~~- ~ ~j r~,r-- .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D~ ;~ I ~ i. ,_ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ y^ ~r -,. I j~~~~ /~~ /~~ OSoPFT~~3t ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~HEt~ ~~/ , ~ ~~, ~~ 3~ °' / ~,. ~~~ \ ~_ ~, ___T_'._p WEST $OPBlyyq[EK~FO\AD ~'.__.__ _''~ /~ ~ /'" /ze 'lam ~~ !~ ( ( ~° ,~ ~~• 1 / ~~~ i~ 1 ~ I L~~ I~~ l ~ sr v.. I. ~ ~ j d ~.,. ~I ~ (?,~Ae,fA(~~S ~ . - , ---- VICINITY MAP a..of , y.- ~. ... ~:.i. tti aTR~ i `• •.'.. . ;', _ ~_.. M LL O M E7 CI. Q d M 0+ 9 117 Q` ~I ~~ IS O+ n I 1:1 .•.•u~.p, .. .r ... •.~,~ -.C )rada~llN .11th aard• Hare6 ,if76 • 1eho7.r .L. ~Terllanie, A~rry L. Teri Jamie and •+• .. . 'h ~ Serliasia aka~•Aitnd Hsy criffltha ' 1 • .. :•f ' and elal• d ;d(.yf • ss oI~OC~fCarfield, p~ 1e nnd• ~al-: ~ Ott ~ ~ Jefferson t:~ ;OMY~ifld Datt, + _ 9onnie•V., Terliemla .. C...::'4:.. .. [,J.~,LLXRRi ;7~ •d ibe=• ::: - . '` ~ d :.•.,.,Carffeld .and aab d 11~7t7•?t~~•;' ~ : Oolw+da, d the ae<ead. .. ~.{;.•ri~, ~ pIING4St1B, That sdd part ies of Ne first parl, ter and Ia eonetdsntlen of tba nos of 7F27 ANO NO/] t ,>: „1,,._ .(910.D0)~ snd~ other oa able eonsiderntion-------------=---------DOLLARS ice.:; •;;.:.'. is !Ds add parties d tha art N hand Pdd >h the said party. ' of tlu aeroed Dart, !ha zeeeipt•wharaef i•-'~ •. : is haobJ tonfe.iad wed aelrnewledked, hVe, . remised. released. rold ronrr ed and ir,.t.o ~ ...~ 7 QDIT CLA33fED, wed hJ _ _ fMia 1[raats do ~ rwvi«, nl sea, aoura7 nd OUTI' CT.AIII Hots Wa old party ~ el tha aaoad girt, her • ~ hero. somawen wed a.l ti fere+er, all the rl fht, atb, lotelwt. <lahv sod 'demand which tha said '• ~saelee: . ilf the lint part !v ve sad to the lellewln f described let er parcel of land ailsaG, 17ina sad '-' halal In the Comlb a< Pi[kin and State'of COiondo, to ..it: b1F.ST SOPRIS '•. .RAftCR:. ;PARCEL •N0.•••6' .... .• __ •.._ .. -'- . • '-- - --•-'; CO ECTIVE OF.Et) .. _ ~ ..._I •• ~A p8rcel•df land situaced Sn the By of Sect'Lon 22, TAS~, R87u of the Geh P.H. more '• par[icularly described as fnllovs: A inning nt ,Che NU corner of snid •Seet lnn.22, '~ •thenee SO'S9'02" W. '7510.10 feet to th True Point oC HaRinning, thence S8A'S4'42"' ~'`" E: 1J17,76 feet, thenee 51.00'46" W. 12~ c76 Cect, thence NeA'S'7'OG" U. 1]17.11 • Ceet,~ thenee NO'S9'.02" E. •12A4:6B feet t tlic Tnle PninE of Rel;innini;: „ ' Notl: all bearings are Colorado Coord lnntc System, Centre] 7.nnG. • ~Cont:aininR 78.840 Acres.. E7fCEPTI0t15: Aeaervinq therefrom all roads, semc or 'oE record: and Furcherm7lre re~ervinR i binp. t ' •to'be constructed across',sabject prnpert}•: and r -utility ensemenc-Snside -n 1l~boundarles. ~• The foregoing Corrects a deed recorded Octnher•25, .. 4 ~ ' ~ -_.. W '. O+ M ~. i . ~i m F tb T Cs ~nnd•reservncinns'oxist Sn>; 0' vide cnsement fora road hormore •rcanrv Ln); a 15' vtde 974 1n~0ook ?92 nt Pngr 777. ., , ' ' TL) IDtVL AND TD SOLD tha same, tefalher with dl Had alwtalar tha appaMena~ne i bdenfhlr er In asTwlee tbenmee aPPart+hdaf. and.aR tha efah, rifht. tltle, Innteat .nd 2 eald pwrt ies e! tha flrft part, dthar !o law ar egelty, to tha Qtly D+aPar sae, bmeliG party d lha saeald pare, her haln~and aadana ferarer. ' prirllefee thareaate , whstaearaq of tha behoo[ o/ the idd .IN.~PI'INFSS WBEREOP,TIm'aiid Paet'tes ad.the flnt patt ha ~~ beleunto ntt'ItPI ~haod•s •• • sad and s thf dal sad year flrai shoo l.rlltao. •' ../~ • . '. ,~ ~'':C; k: C'•f.l l ~7 `•-!ter.. -r . t [SEAL? glfad, Soiled mid Deareler~4ln the Ptesoro e( •'• / • -- - 11aT ry• 4' 'Ctrl IAmiw.f f9E~ 7 I`~i/on 1. r ar •taml.r•':7 n .,ono • nv l.rl ff Chs • _ .~ • BTATC OF C0I.0RAOO. • .. ' ' . Ceantl of ~ ~ ~ ew. .. 11•• 1• ~ . . ' t. ' Thi lelefsias Wh,lnot wv ielmewledaed hefen ea lhle f r dal of 1f Z'e .h'/' Nirhni aw 1.. Trrl lnml x, Ilnrrv 1.. Trrl Inmix and Annn Hnv TM1rI lnmin aMn Anne y r fCl [hil:"""•' " ~ - ~ .. _. _,. •',. htJ eealmlaelsn eapltes ~ if . Wltnees m7 hand and otffald eed. . ' '• .Nr Galmlisim [rpires loll I1, 1971 ' - .. .. wr.n nu4. ,:1 .°. .•.• a•,f o,e •r ... I~ v `D I ,-. I .D J m 9 ru .D CJI r ~f D ?t G7 O "n i. II o. t:~ a .. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: 12 May 1996 TO: Pitkin County Variance Department FROM: C. Restivo, L. Strawbridge CC: HTA, Chron. SUBJECT: Authorization for Harry Teague Architects This note is intended to authorize Harry Teague Architects to represent us in seeking a variance in our application to Pitkin County for a building permit. Please contact us if we can answer any additional questions regarding this authorization. Thank you. Leslie C. Strawbr~iyd/ge ,~ -~- Charles W.M. Restivo ~-, ,.., STATE 06 COLORADO Roy Romer, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Perry D. Olson, Director 8060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 Telephone: (303) 297-1192 REFER TO For Wildlife- ForPeople 5-16-96 Harry Teague Architects 412 N. Mill Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Mr. Teague: On 5-13-96 I met with you regarding the Restivo home up West Sopris Creek. You stated that the county set a height limitation of 20' in order to meet the DOW's recommendation of a low profile home. Based upon your design, which you showed me a scaled model, there would be 2 places which would exceed that limit: the southeast corner of the roof and the northeast part which is a solar hot water booster area. This should not cause any additional impacts to wildlife. The home, if built like the model, blends into the surrounding area, keeps the footprint small which results in less sprawl and impacts to wildlife. Thank you for showing me your design. please give me a call. If you have any questions, Since ly, 'n ~ (~ Kevin Wrig District W dlife Manager Carbondale ~d~+~l~i~~~~ - DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Kenneth Salazar, Executive bir`tictor WILDLIFE COMMISSION, William R. Hogberg, Member • Eldon W. Cooper, Chairman • Felix Chavez, Member • Rebecca L. Frank, MembE Louis F. Swift, Member • George Van DenBerg, Member • Larry M. Wright, Member • Thomas M. Eve, Member HARRY TEAGUE ARC~"YECTS 412 N. Mill ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 925.2556 FAX (970) 925.7981 hta@infosphene.eom TO ~ aL ~ ~"~ \ l1T ~1~1~.tT'i WE ARE SENDING YOU ^ Attached ^ Under separate cover via ^ Shop drawings ^ Prints ^ Plans ^ Copy of letter ^ Change order ^ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION i+ •O , \ ~, ') '~ t, . P n 4 ` ~ ,y THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ^ For approval ^ For your use ^ As requested ^ For review and comment ^ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ^ Resubmit copies for approval ^ Submit copies for distribution ^ Return corrected prints 19 ^ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: l/enclosures are not as noted, kind/y notliy us at once. ~yt' ^ Approved as submitted ^ Approved as noted ^ Returned for corrections dC~44C~'-`3 OCR 4 ° ~ I~]~Ln ]~44LQ[~ DATE JOB N ATTENTION 4 7 S 1 6 W c f ( ~ ` r the following items: ^ Samples ^ Specifications Aspen/Pitlzin Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street , ~ Aspen, Colorado 81611 ,(~ (970) 920-5090 ~ ~ (~~• ~a~ City Lanti Use Application Fees: 00113-63850-041 -6?855-042 -f,3 850-043 -63885-268 -63875.046 - NiRCIl County Land U OOll3-63800-033 -63805-0?4 -63320-037 -63825-038 Keferral Fees: 00113-63810.035 00115-63340-163 00123-63340-190 00125-63340-205 00113-63815-U36 Sales: 00113-63830-039 -69000-145 Deposit Flat Fee HPC Public Right-of• Way 'Coning & Sign i'ermif Llse Tex se Application Fees: Deposit Flat Fze Zoning Board of Adjustment County Engineer City Engineer Housing Environmental Health County Clerk County Code Copy Fees Other -' + . ;a 'i ~ Date:'~_ /, i _z~ Check:, t"-'•r'. Address: ' == X i Project: ' ?_ E- ~. ; Case No: Phone: No. of Copies c_i ~,*/etA~ \~ ''i 1 Q d' O ~~~~~ ~~~' ~~ TI a V ~ / V i>o ~~ 1_^, rJ 'l) /~ 1 '. L~ gxO~t~ N Ind ~ ~° ~ _ H ~ > x'~ ~ "vda ~ ~ ~ i- ,', q~ `m `~ ~ ~ 1. A ) 4 V U~w?~eL ,~;' ,1~ ~ y, <~oow~ ~)~:n k ~~ si p4 ~a~~'~~ J/ '~ O ~>~~~.~ o ~ .~ ~ ~ -~ --_ ~~ ~' '' '. ~+ 5r'oe 1 ~ ~ h. ~r F .~ ~.-r9 ~ ~A~°w° ~ C { - ~ ~ n~Kp~im `~ A ~ V VJ ~~~ia~ u~ ~ V r a~`o w i> ~ s 1 K 1 SjaZ<i JW ~ •. ~~n n~SYW GO 2 ~~ \ '~ .. / ~ O } o> _ _, ~ W~ ,4 -_ ~ m A'^~ : '--+~~ ~ _ ~~ ~_ \\\ ~ _ ~{ X _---~_ ~ \ ~ z n k / / ` ~` --~~.'~~ ~ \ oil p~~ a~o €: p ~~~ ~~ ~22~ ~ ~4~ 30~ FFx k` ~ ~~e S ~N mtlm~ `m O pb N~ ilY <M yY~ FF ~ ~oz ~ z~~~ /~ / / /--- - -------~ -~~-_ z ~ __ „ ~, w~ e i ~/ ,~ ~----~~~ ~ ~ ~~ y --.a ~ _ _ ~. ~ S3 ~~ S i' ~- - - ~/ /~//// ~//1 ' /~i // / / ~ / ~ // ice/ eo" ~/ °1> o i ~~~ „~ 8$ S ~ i / i ~ r ./ ~~ J (Q V U (\~ .. ) J W ,II y a t Q ~ $ 7' ~ z q ~ M w ^ R ~ sm e A,~,~ ,..,:, / / /~ /~/ / , z i I --~ - --....- ~ 3" n I W ~ v I .a ~I`8 3 F TS e3~ ~7 ~e~~a°~ :8.:~:„d H ~mo$ee6 a o a a N~..~s ~ '~ °w~~ W ~9C5~~m A ~y 33d a 6~~~G"~ ~ ~` R•„~ .W7 m ~~.,. S n~C~og ~~~~ ~ ,oo~~~Q pV . m f w ~~(®(®ii O~O t nF~V ,: o R r P4 hGLL ~ I T -~Y~~' IE 81 i~ ,~, ` J - - ~,, ;e Ed VOA " mO~H ° coos ~od 3m~ d ~.n~ °a~so; °e op~a ~~ ~ °, ~ 'a/Y ~o~~ ~ ~ °gg,Y2 6s ~` ~ Eno z ,77 tl.F ~ ~°• ~°`08 ~~~Xoo- ~ ~~~3 °o~6~OO g o ~w~: ~:"~~oo ° n ~ ~~~a " a~ ~~ a ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~.~~ e ~a I ~ ~?oa I He o~~ a~N ~~~ 0 y a 6 t Q U 1 ~ W w z Q m O Qf~ Q N Z W O y O W J d ~W m~ kH LL ~¢ ~~ ~o °a ins o~ °a4 m 0 ~p =m op .n e~ ~~ N m N = O W G L ~ p JO J Un i ,~~,~~ x ~:, U_ ><im ~ ~m~ C ~ t O<A V o'V~ 3~~i ~a8¢ 1E~~ a, g; ~~I; aF€f i ~tEt 94:1 s„3.,,,, 3~~.,. a ~~ u • x i S a _ ~ I~ 3 \ V ~~ ~. ~~ \\ ~\ \\'. 1 _~ `'\ ~_ -` Pr r .~. 1. _ ~ ,-- i I / ~ ~ ~, F' ~ \ ~~ Qluno~ '9 ld'] uoia~n~pgng ~. ~ sndpg ~SOM ~u19sne~ I ~~ e~ V ~'~ ;a: ~, r si~i # ~~ ~~~~~- ~ ~~~~ l~ ~~ ' ~ /~ .. \ \ -.~ ~ ...` \ ~ _ \ \~ \\~\ _~ ~ ~ ~\ _ ~_ \~\ -- . ~I r / ~ , /~ %' / `~.//: X a g§~ I rI7 g t'1 oe x¢ i~ ~a~ waa wF w ~ " ~~a `~B x <~ ~a;8 a8n nS ~o ~ 6"s @8 ~~ <W ~ N~n2 `F V< S ~ LL ~r E ~~ ,~ ~: ~ a ~~ 1° ~ ~~ ~ ~3 i ~ , ,o FI Y ~ ~ ~ n ri m I~ I xg q~ "n gi{ ~ ~58 °° ~k ~~~ F Rg~ ± n}e e of ~ ~~E ~€E ~ ~ § y ~~ ~ ~ < d ~ ( ~ g c ~ w ~ ~ o ~~~~ ~° f ~~ {d`` y . ~8{f ~BRd ~°~ ]~ad 4 3~~ QSi3 ` y ~ ~T~~ ~i~id ~~V~ N~ IE W s t ` i ~ Y ~ o u < g t G g ° x / / ~~ C ~ i I ~ _._ _ _ ~, - _ i I w w V properly Ilne ,.. ____C ~~~---_ ;. ~~ _ /~ /~~~~~ f/_~~ 1 i ~C/~ r .. ~ -~ _-~_ ~_~~ _ ~ „_ . ___... I al ,~ ~-.. _. __.. _._---__~ * _ _^1~ 5'bd2 ~' ~ / ` S~ ~~ ..,~~n ` rl T 0 fl\ 1 I i i .i i. C u ~° A~ a , I N I ~' ~ ' I ~ I "JII °~, I I I I I ~, ~: ~ ~~ I I I I '9 y~l f ~S u~ I ; I ~' t- Y 1 'J 3 l I X 'J b y ~ ~ G ~ I ,' ~ , a ~a ~ ~u n I ~ ' ,~b., I I~il ~~el~ x~ 14 I I ,f I _I "Y ' ~ I iII" I!Ii!I~ III III- ; II S - ~, ,.., ..._ --..._ I _ __ _ - _ _ _. 151 ?,6i ui ~~~ , t ~ ~ j a F i~ill~y~ ~ pp ggF FM~Fay lk ~ !~l J ~~ i P ~ BF f ii pp ~j r ~3~ k~i~il9 ~~ ~~ ~~ d~ i~ 'R ~~ ~g ~Fpp ~i~ ~ ~~~ e p 4 e 3 F F Y ~R ~ ~~ R~ ~~~~~~~! r~ ~- s i a v i u o u n a. a r x ___ I ~_~_- -,- ~ :~-~_ ~~ .••• ME_Ccheck COMPLIANCE REPORT ~~ '3 Model Energy Code M...,check Software Version 2.0 ,-, ~/~ Permit # CITY: Aspen STATE: Colorado HDD:~ 8853 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Single Family DATE: 4-22-1996 DATE OF PLANS: 4/12/96 TITLE: Laughing Elk Residence PROJECT INFORMATION: West Sbpris Creek Subdivison, Lot 6 Pitkin County, Colorado COMPANY INFORMATION: Jeff Dickinson Biospaces, Inc 0504 Crystal Circle Carbondale, CO 81623 Cr"'PLIANCE: PASSES Fi fired UA = 411 Your Home = 389 CEILINGS WALLS: Wood Frame, 24" O.C. WALLS: Wood Frame, 24" O.C. WALLS: Concrete GLAZING: Windows or Doors GLAZING: Windows or Doors DOORS BSMT:,4.0' ht/4.0' bg/4.0' insul Area or Insul Perimeter R-Value 1502 38.0 1470 19.0 414 25.0 507 0.0 461 60 44 842 20.0 Checked by/Date ~cNir~ it G Sheath Glazing/Door R-Value U-Value UA ------------------------- 12.0 33 10.0 56 10.0 14 10.0 40 0.370 171 0.330 20 0.490 22 33 COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: The .proposed building design represented in these documents is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to me theirequirements of the 1993 CAHO Model En rgy Code. Builder/Designer Date (1 RECEIVED APR 2 3 1996 County of Firkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY POSTI\'G } ss. OF A VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE State of Colorado } THE PITI{IN COUN"CY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: I, $F'-f~P ?JB iE~' L .being or representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the ~ day of ~`~, 19 ~ 6 to the ~ day of J~N~ , 196 (:Must be posted for at least nine (9 11 days before the hearing date). ~---~ n ~7 Subscri d sworn to before me this ~' day of t~~~n 19~ by ..~ WITNESS~M`"Y",~H°,'AN~D' A:~1D OFFICIAL SEAL. My,, or fission expires:_,~j "~- ~ ~7 Nota~fjf~ Public's Signature ~~ 3 ~ Y~i~. ~.,..._. Address ~~ I7!~,P~It1 •7 l .L a. • .. ~~. C~ ~.. ~. ~, - t ~ ~ J ; i s~ M j l„' ~ C~ ~ • r • • BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resoludon of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for vaziance from the provisions of the County Zotting Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appeaz and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appeaz personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: Location of meeting: Owner: Owner's Address: Property Location or Description: May 7, 1996 at 5:15 p.m. Meeting Room, Pitkin County Library 120 N. Mill, Aspen Leslie Strawbridge & Chazles Restivo P.O. Box 587 Basalt, CO 81621 Parcel 6, West Sopris Creek Subdivision Requesting approval fora 13' and a 4' Height Variance, where 20' is required in the RS-30 Zone District, for the construction of a single family residence. VARL*u'~iCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. Duration of Variance: Temporary _ Permanent ~ MAY 3 ~ 1996 ~,.., r ~,F,M-n*M:n~~ r <~ ~ ? ~~ y ~ f ~ ~y ~!~ __ ~M1 /. ~ ` <l ~C ' `v ' .~ \y~ ~~ ~~ .~ „'~ ri rl .~ ~ ~ ~~8 ~~ i ~"~ N ~ ~ W ~~8 0 ~~ room `~ ~P G~4. O ~P ~G~' M~~ A ~~ P ~`~ 40 ~O~ r ~r 394836 Q17/ 17/96 ~3: E'ti 1 OF 1 "^ hltl: UUL; 1.11.;1.; SILVIA DAVIS PIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORD ID.01D RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIlV COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT GRANTING A HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR LESLIE STRAWBRIDGE & CHARLES RESTIVO Resolution No. 96-12 WHEREAS, Leslie Strawbridge and Chazles Restivo, owners of 1200 Stone Rd, aze requesting approval of a 13' and a 4' height variance, for construction of a single family residence; and WHEREAS, the maximum building height is restricted to 20' pursuant to BOCC resolution 95-146 due to wildlife considerations; and WHEREAS, the subject property is described as Pazce16, West Sopris Creek Subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the Boazd of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 7-10.30, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Boazd of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hazdship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substantial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. 4. The Division of Wildlife has approved the design of the proposed residence, stating in their letter dated May 16, 1996, that it will not cause any additional impacts to wildlife. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Boazd of Adjustment, height variances of li' and 4' shall be granted, for construction of a single family residence, as shown on the attached plans (Exhibit "A"), due to solaz considerations. WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Boazd of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: June 4, 1996 ATTEST: ~~~ ~ w _~ Secretary Bill Lukes, Chair y Boazd of A ent Pitkin County Boazd of Adjustment AGENDA/1VIEM0 PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT June 4, 1996 at 5:15 P.M. PrrxIN COUNTY LIBRARY MEETING ROOM 96-10 BAAR, RON R-30 Lot 1, Rubey Subdivision Requesting approval fora 5' Height Variance, where 20' is allowed for the construction of a detached residential gazage and cazetaker dwelling unit. Property Location: Lot 1, Rubey Subdivision. 96-11 SKINNER, STEVE & SKYE 31300 Hwy. 82, #52 Requesting approval fora 3.5' Reaz Yazd Setback Variance, where 10' is required, for the placement of a new mobile home. Property Location: Lot 52, Aspen V illage. 96-12 STRAWBRIDGE, LESLIE & RESTIVO, CHARLES RS-30 Parcel 6, West Sopris Creek Subdivision Requesting approval fora 13' and a 4' Height Variance, where 20' is allowed for the construction of a single family residence. Property Location: Pazce16, West Sopris Creek Subdivision. 96-13 SMEINS, DUANE & HIM RS-30 Parcel 6, Gesberg Tracts Requesting approval fora 40' and a 45' Major Road Setback Variance, where 100' is required, for the construction of a gazage and single family residence respectively. Property Location: Pazce16, Gesberg Tracts, 11.5 miles from the intersection of Highway 82 and Highway 133. 96-14 NAKAGAWA, SATOSHI SR Space 82, Lazy Glen Requesting approval fora 16T Arterial Highway Setback Variance, where 200' is required as measured from the Highway 82 right-of--way, and also requesting a 664 square foot floor azea variance, where a maximum of 1151 squaze feet is allowed in the SR Zone District for a 7195 squaze foot lot, for the placement of a mobile home. Property Location: Space 82, Lazy Glen, Highway 82. Minutes of the May 7, 1996 meeting. PLEASE CONTACT GEORGE LILLY, 920-5442, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO CONFIRM IF YOU WILL ATTEND THE MEETING. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITHIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Heazing will be held to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for vaziance from the provisions of the Counry zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance aze invited to appeaz and state their views, protests, or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for vaziance. A VARIANCE GREATER THAN OR LESS THAN THAT REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. DATE AND TIME OF MEETING: Tuesday, June 4, 1996; 5:15 P.M. LOCATION OF MEETING: Meeting Room, Pitkin County Library Bear, Ron: Requesting approval fora 5' Height Variance, where 20' is required in the R-30 Zone District, for the constmction of a detached residential garage and caretaker dwelling unit. Property Location: Lot 1, Rubey Subdivision. Nakagawa, Satoshi: Requesting approval fora 167' Arterial Highway Setback Variance, where 200' is required as measured from the Highway 82 right-of--way, and also requesting a 664 square foot floor area vaziance, where a maximum of 1151 squaze feet is allowed in the SR Zone District fora 7195 square foot lot, for the placement of a mobile home. Property Location: Space 82, Lary Glen, Highway 82. Skinner, Steve & Skye: Requesting approval fora 3.5' Reaz Yard Setback Variance, where 10' is required, for the placement of a new mobile home. Property Location: 31309 Highway 82, Lot 52, Aspen Village. Smeins, Duane & I';'mt: Requesting approval fora 40' and a 45' Major Road Setback Variance, where 100' is required, for the construction of a garage and single family residence respectively. Property Location: Parcel 6, Gesberg Tracts (11.5 miles from the intersection of Highway 82 and Highway 133). Strawbridge, Leslie & Restivo, Charles: Requesting approval fora 13' and a 4' Height Variance, where 20 foot is allowed in the RS-30 Zone District, for the construction of a single family residence. Property Location: Parcel 6, West Sopris Creek Subdivision. Submitted to the Aspen Times on May 21, 1996 To Be Published in the Aspen Times on May 25, 1996. Pitkin County Account r~ v MINUTES n e~ Pitkin County Board of Adjustment June 4, 1996 Members Present: Bill Luker, Chair Shira Geller Rod Dyer John Wheeler (arrived late) Ellie Brickham Staff: Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Officer George Lilly, Secretary Lukes opened the meeting at 5:15 PM. Case #96-10. Ron Baar. Lot 1. Rubev Subdivision. Luker introduced the request for approval fora 5' height vaziance, where 20' is allowed, for the construction of a detached residential garage and cazetaker dwelling unit. Ron Baaz was present and explained that the added height to the gazage was being requested so the Aspen Fire Department's antique fire truck could be housed there. He said the visual impact would be nil since the location of the structure would be at the bottom of a wooded hill. Schaffner indicated that, as a detached accessory structure that is more than 20' from the principal structure, the height of the gazage would be limited to 20' at the midpoint of the roof and 25' at the ridge. There were no members of the public present to comment on this case. Luker suggested that having the cazetaker unit and the garage in a one-story structure, as opposed to the proposed two-story structure, would be preferable and eliminate the need for a vaziance. Baaz responded that aone-story plan would present other topographical problems which would impact the hillside alot more, as well as necessitate the cutting down of more trees. Luker said that he was unable to see a significant enough hazdship to be able to support granting the variance, especially given the level of precedence that could be set. A discussion of roof types, building envelope placement, and cazetaker unit size ensued, with Geller suggesting that the entire roof could be lowered or reconfigured to accomodate all the desired functions of the building. Lukes suggested that the request be tabled, so that other design options could be pursued without closing the case. Lukes moved to table the application until the July meeting, unanimously approved. Case #96-11. Steve & Skve Skinner. 31300 Hwy. 82. #52. Lukes introduced the request for approval fora 3.5' reaz yard setback variance, where 10' is required, for the placement of a new mobile home on Lot 52, AspenVillage. Schaffner stated that Aspen Village recently underwent subdivision and in so doing have a new setback requirement, which is 10'. The applicant wants to remove an existing trailer and replace it with a new trailer which will be 26'8" by 56'. The building next to it is currently a gazage and the owners have an application in to convert that to an accessory structure. Richazd Jackson, from the Aspen Village Homeowners Association, was present as the owner's representative. He indicated that the Homeowners azchitectural committee had approved all the Skinner's proposed modifications except the setback, over which they have no jurisdiction. The Homeowners Assn. supports the granting of the setback vaziance to help preserve open space. Jackson presented photographs showing the layout of the lot and trailer. No public comment was forthcoming. Lukes read a letter from Gail Olsen, Lot #53, Aspen Village, in support of the Skinner's request. Brickham moved to approve a 3.5' reaz yazd setback vaziance for the placement of a new mobile home, due to existing conditions. Geller seconded. Motion approved 4-0. Case #96-12, Leslie Strawbridge & Chazles Restivo. Pazcel 6. West Sonris Creek Subdivision. Lukes introduced the request for approval fora 13' and a 4' height variance, where 20' is allowed, for the construction of a single family residence. Schaffner indicated that the 1041 review for West Sopris Creek Subdivision had given a height restriction of 20' to the midpoint of the roof allowing another 5' to the peak, primazily to minimize the visual disturbance to the elk. Harry Teague was present and explained the azchitectural necessity of the proposed design as integral to the construction of an "off-the-grid" energy efficient home. In response to topographical and access limitations, it was felt that atwo-story configuration with a shed roof and solaz hot-water booster tower optimizes the surface to volume ratio that is crucial to a solaz-powered structure. Luker read a letter from Kevin Wright, from the Division of Wildlife, which stated the DOW's support for the project as designed. Luker asked for public comment. Susan Manchee, a neighbor and owner of Lot 4, asked about the carport, since the shazed driveway comes within about 15' of it, and ]earned that the cazport would be screened by vegetation. As an adjacent neighbor, she was not concerned about the areas of the house for which a variance was being requested. Luker expressed concern over the degree of height variance being requested for the solar tower. Dyer asked what benefit that particulaz design would provide. Teague replied that the smallness of the building required maximization of southern exposure and that the additional glazing will increase solar gain, in addition to providing the space to contain a hot water tank that will get direct solaz gain by virtue of being above the surrounding scrub oak. Geller moved to grant 13' and 4' height vaziances, where 20' is allowed, for the construction of a single family residence due to solar considerations per the plans submitted. Dyer seconded. Approved 4-0. Case #96-13, Duane & Kim Smeins, Pazcel 6. Gesbere Tracts Luker introduced the request for approval fora 40' and a 45' major road setback vaziance, where 100' is required, for the construction of a gazage and single family residence respectively. Schaffner stated that the applicants, who were present, received 1041 Hazazd review approval, comply with all their yazd setback requirements, but require a major road setback vaziance. She added that half of the parcel is unusable due to the floodplain. No members of the public were present to comment. Dyer moved to approve a 40' and a 45' major road setback variance, where 100' is required, for the construction of a gazage and single family residence respectively as shown on the plans submitted due to topographical and practical hazdships and proximity to the floodplain. Brickham seconded. Approved 5-0. (Wheeler arrived prior to the vote.) Case #96-14. Satoshi Nakaeawa. Space 82. Lazy Glen Luker introduced the request for approval fora 167' arterial highway setback variance, where 200' is required as measured from the Highway 82 right-of-way, and the request fora 664 squaze foot floor azea vaziance, where a maximum of 1151 squaze feet is allowed in the SR zone district fora 7195 square foot lot, for the placement of a mobile home. Schaffner explained that Lazy Glen is undergoing the subdivision process, which is about half completed, and that after that process there will be setbacks and floor area ratios that will be better suited to the park. Approximately two-thirds to three-quarters of the park is in the 200' highway setback. Schaffner continued that the applicant's trailer would comply with all the yard setbacks that aze proposed for the park. Mr. Nakagawa was present with Mac Cunningham acting as the applicant's representative. Cunningham noted that the new FAR requirements will be 25-30% which would allow a 2600 square foot house, instead of the current 16%. Schaffner indicated that the new guidelines have had conceptual approval but had not yet been adopted, and that it may be the end of the year before the final adoption occurs. Concern was expressed regarding granting approvals for vaziances with the zoning pazameters not yet established. Cunningham produced a document with the proposed guidelines, which refers to FAR as being 35%. He added that Mr. Nakagawa had already purchased his new trailer when the subdivision process began, that Mr. Nakagawa has a buyer for his existing trailer, and that to delay the transfer of the two trailers til January would definitely put Mr. Nakagawa in a bind. Wheeler addressed the issue of the existing sheds on the property, noting that a condition could be placed on a vaziance approval that would require their removal. Cunningham said that the sheds were built by the pazk back in the 60's and are shazed by adjoining property owners. The westernmost shed could be removed as a compromise. Placement of the trailer was discussed. Nakagawa's proposal would allow him to park his cars plus have a small front yazd. The Lazy Glen Homeowner's Association requires a 5' easement along the front lot line for future improvements to the infrastructure. Wheeler asserted his position that the trailer should be placed further into the park. Wheeler moved to approve the application fora 574 squaze foot FAR adjustment in lieu of the requested 664 squaze foot FAR adjustment, contingent on the removal of the 9' x 10' shed that is not in common ownership, and fora 162' arterial highway setback variance in lieu of the 167' requested, where 200' is required, due to downzoning. Lukes seconded. Approved 5-0. *x*~*********~************~~~~************~~**~**~****~**~************** Dyer moved to approve the minutes of the May meeting, Lukes seconded, unanimously approved. Geller expressed concern over the use of the term "azchitect" by the Boazd in referring to an applicant's representative. She cautioned that only registered azchitects can legally have that term applied to them. Meeting adjourned at 7:30 PM. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~%`~ George Lill ecretary ~, Date C~lApproved as submitted Approve with rnoted change(s) w, Bil ukes, Chair ~ N~'~ Date • Aspen/pitkin Community Development Department ,`~, 130 South Galena Street (~U/ Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5090 ~~ ~ ~'1~~ ~ `~ ~ City Land Use Application Fces: OOli3-63850.041 -0=855-042 Deposit -633.50-043 Flat Fee - -------_---- F[PC --- - - -6388,_'58 --- ----- -638%5-046 Public i2ight-ct~k~ay _ _ - ------ --__-. - 1bIRC t i Lating & Sign Permit - - --- __ Use Tax _-_ _ ___--. County Land Use Application Fees: -- ------- -`- OOi13-63800.033 -63805-034 Deposit -533~p-037 Flat F'ee --- -- _ _ -- -538?. 5- Zoning ---- -.-_-_-- 0."s8 Board of Adjustment - - -------- iteferral Fees: 001!3-538;0.035 00115-63340- 163 County Engineer 0013.63340-190 City Engineer - - -- - 00125.63340-205 ttousing ---_____ 00 1 1 3-63 8 15.036 Environmental Health -------_ County Clerk - ----- - ----__ Sales: _ -- --~_ 00113-63830-039 -59000-145 County Code Copy Fees -- _- ~- Other Name: Taal _---~- Address-~ ~---- Date: Check: - - 1 ---~ Proiecr. --___ Phone:__ Case No: (P _ ~ ~--- No. of Copies 3 { --